Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Scope :
The Ballsim_Direct spreadsheet was designed to simulate the Size-by-Size Mass Balance around any given
Conventional Ball Mill grinding section, of the Direct configuration (see Flowsheet), operating under various conditions,
on the basis of well accepted mathematical models for the grinding and hydroclassification processes.
Theoretical Framework :
For the simulation of the ball mill response, this routine is based on the so called Modern Theory of Comminution. This
theory introduced two new sets of parameters : the Selection Function S and the Breakage Function B. The first set
also referred to as Grindability relates to the grinding kinetics of each independent particle and the second set also
referred to as Distribution of Primary Fragments characterizes the size distribution of the fragments produced as a
result of breakage events.
The Figure below helps define both concepts with greater clarity. Consider that at any given instant t, the size distribution
of the mineral charge in a hypothetical batch mill is quantified by the fractions f i (i = 1, n) retained on the n different screens
represented on the left of such Figure. After a time interval t, the resulting size distribution is represented on the right of
the same Figure. During this time interval, some particles will be fractured and their fragments redistributed to the lower
screens. For the particles retained on mesh i+1 (the i fraction), the Selection Function Si (min-1) denotes the fractional
breakage velocity; that is, the fraction of the particles in the size range [d i+1 , di] which are fractured, per unit of time.
Therefore, the product (Sit) represents the fraction of the material retained on mesh i+1, at time t, that will be fractured
by the action of the grinding media, during the following time period t. Complementarily, the Breakage Function bij
denotes the fraction, by weight, of the fragments arising from the breakage of the particles retained on mesh j+1 to be
retained on the lower i+1 mesh.
t =t t = t +t
(1-S 1t) f1
f1
2 S 1t f1 2
b21S1t f1
f2
3 (1-S 2t) f2 3
S2t f2
bi1S1t f1
fi
i +1 bi2S2t f2 i +1
bn1S1t f1
fn
bn2S2t f2
n +1
n +1
i+1
represents the cummulative fraction of fragments from the breakage of particles retained on mesh j that will become finer
than mesh i.
With reference to the Figure above, it is then possible to establish, for each size fraction i, the following population
balance of particles :
Considering the limiting condition when t approaches zero, the expression above reduces to the system of first order
differential equations :
1
The analytical solution of this complex system of differential equations is fortunately known, under the restrictive
assumption that the parameters S and B are invariant with time; so giving rise to particular solution of the general system
denoted Linear Model, which in its matrix form is expressed as :
f = ( T J T-1 ) f (4)
where :
f = {fi | i = 1, 2, , n} = vector containing the size distribution of the mill discharge (ground product),
f = {fi | i = 1, 2, , n} = vector containing the size distribution of the mill feed,
T = {Tij | i,j = 1, 2, , n} = lower triangular matrix of values Tij recursively defined as :
Tij = 0 ; when i < j
Tij = 1 ; when i = j
i-1
Tij = S ( bik Sk Tkj )/( Si Sj ) ; when i > j
k=j
and where - the average mean residence time - and N are parameters characteristic of the Residence Time Distribution
(RTD) of the mineral slurry in the mill, here represented by :
referred to as the N-Mixers in Series Model and where the parameter N may be approximated by the effective
(Lenght/Diameter) ratio of the mill.
The grinding model parameters (the Selection and Breakage parameters) are different for different particle sizes. Such
dependence is here represented by the following relationships :
An expanded form of this expression - also available in this simulation routine - is given by :
An expanded form of this expression - also available in this simulation routine - is obtained by replacing 0 in
Equation 7 by :
These expanded forms for Si and Bij are intended to provide the model greater descriptive flexibility when tuning
the model to actual specific grinding systems (see Files BallParam_Batch and BallParam_Open) but, since they
increment the total number of ore characteristic parameters to be estimated, its use should be avoided whenever
possible.
In any case, the proposed expanded forms reduce to the normal forms if 02 and 01 are set equal to zero.
Not considering the expanded forms, the above expressions considerably reduce the number of ore characteristic
parameters to a maximum of seven (0, 1, 2, dcrit, 0, 1 and 2) and simplify the computation of the (n-1) S is values and
the n(n-1)/2 Bijs values required for the evaluation of the model.
where Pballs represents the contribution of the balls to the Net Mill Power Draw (kW) (see Mill Power_Ball Mills), it may
be concluded that :
SiEballs Eballs = Si t (batch grinding)
or : S iEballs Eballs = Si (continuous grinding) (10)
Therefore, it is enough to replace in Equations 4 above the products (S it) or (Si) by the product (SiEballsEballs) to obtain the
equations of the Linear Grinding Model in terms of the Specific Selection Function, S iEballs.
The mathematical simulation of the response of grinding/classification circuits, like the one represented here in Flowsheet,
requires the proper combination of the unit grinding and classification models. As a result of the circulating load stream,
both models can not be solved independently : the feed to the mill is affected by the cyclones discharge stream which
depends on the cyclones feed and this cyclones feed is affected by the mill discharge, which in turns depends on the mill
feed. Such interdependence condition implies that the system must be solved with the aid of numerical convergence
algorithms, starting from an initial guessed value for the Circulating Load ratio (defined as the ratio of the massflowrate of
solids in the cyclones discharge stream to the massflowrate of solids in the cyclones overflow stream). For such purposes,
the present Ballsim_Direct simulator makes use of the Goal Seek tool available in Microsoft Excel.
The data required by the simulator must be defined in each corresponding unprotected white background cell - inside the
red double-lined border - of the here attached Data_File worksheet. Gray background cells contain the results of the
corresponding formulas there defined and are protected to avoid any accidental editing.
In addition to the above, the user is requested to provide an initial guess of the Circulating Load ratio in Cell E21. Finally,
the system is solved by single clicking on the macro button Iterate, next to Cell E21.
Important Notice : Iterate ... must be clicked every time any element of input data gets to be modified. After clicking
ITERATE, Cell E23 must display a zero value; otherwise, the current outputs are not valid.
New Moly-Cop Tools users are invited to explore the brief comments inserted in each relevant cell, rendering the whole
utilization of the worksheets self-explanatory. Eventually, the user may wish to remove the view of the comments by
selecting Tools / Options / View / Comments / None.
bkj (1)
raction i at time t]
tion i broken during the time interval t]
dded to fraction i as a result of the breakage
nally retained in the coarser fractions (j = 1, i-1)]
ferential form.
T-1 ) f (4)
Si Sj ) ; when i > j
dcrit)2 ] (6)
0) (di/dj+1)2 (7)
; i = 1, 2, ..., n (8)
(batch grinding)
(continuous grinding) (9)
Net Mill Power Draw (kW) (see Mill Power_Ball Mills), it may
(batch grinding)
(continuous grinding) (10)
Classifier Constants :
a1 a2 a3 a4
9.680 1.401 54.964 0.523 0.950
9.680 1.401 54.964 0.523 0.950 Suggested Default Values
40.00 % Solids
60.29 % - Size 18
psi 7.98 150.0 P80
# of Cyclones 10
Vortex 7.50 Circ. Load 3.06
Apex 3.67 0.372 Bpf m3/hr 1566
0.392 Bpw
% Solids 76.00
Water,
m3/hr 355.1
ton/hr 400.0 Water, 223.9
F80 9795 m3/hr
Gross kW 4316.1
kWh/ton 10.79 % Balls 38.00
Wio 15.08 % Critical 72.00
% Solids 72.00
% Solids 62.20
CLASSIFIERS PERFORMANCE
Size Distributions
Mill Mill
i Mesh Opening Mid-Size Feed Discharge
% Solids in the Mill 72.00 Charge Mill Charge Weight, tons Apparent
Ore Density, ton/m3 2.80 Volume, Ball Slurry Density
Slurry Density, ton/m3 1.86 m3 Charge Interstitial above Balls ton/m3
Balls Density, ton/m3 7.75 63.76 296.48 47.48 0.00 5.395