0 Voti positivi0 Voti negativi

12 visualizzazioni8 pagineIn Deregulation Electricity Market, the optimal location of Independent power producer (IPP) is found by using Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP) with Newton-Raphson Method. LMP is the most trendy congestion management technique and used to find out the congestion charge at particular nodes based on the marginal generation cost. The aim of this paper is to maximize the social welfare and to obtain the optimal site of IPP using an LMP and managing the transmission lines overflow while rewarding security constraints of transmission lines in the competitive power marketplace. The LMP ranking method is used to find out the location of IPP. This paper explains how LMP calculation is performed at each bus at which location the transmission lines overflow occurs and how the overflow is alleviated by connecting the IPP at the congested spot in order to maximize the social welfare. The proposed method illustrated by case studies on the IEEE 30 bus and Indian utility 69 bus system.

Apr 11, 2017

© © All Rights Reserved

PDF, TXT o leggi online da Scribd

In Deregulation Electricity Market, the optimal location of Independent power producer (IPP) is found by using Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP) with Newton-Raphson Method. LMP is the most trendy congestion management technique and used to find out the congestion charge at particular nodes based on the marginal generation cost. The aim of this paper is to maximize the social welfare and to obtain the optimal site of IPP using an LMP and managing the transmission lines overflow while rewarding security constraints of transmission lines in the competitive power marketplace. The LMP ranking method is used to find out the location of IPP. This paper explains how LMP calculation is performed at each bus at which location the transmission lines overflow occurs and how the overflow is alleviated by connecting the IPP at the congested spot in order to maximize the social welfare. The proposed method illustrated by case studies on the IEEE 30 bus and Indian utility 69 bus system.

© All Rights Reserved

12 visualizzazioni

In Deregulation Electricity Market, the optimal location of Independent power producer (IPP) is found by using Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP) with Newton-Raphson Method. LMP is the most trendy congestion management technique and used to find out the congestion charge at particular nodes based on the marginal generation cost. The aim of this paper is to maximize the social welfare and to obtain the optimal site of IPP using an LMP and managing the transmission lines overflow while rewarding security constraints of transmission lines in the competitive power marketplace. The LMP ranking method is used to find out the location of IPP. This paper explains how LMP calculation is performed at each bus at which location the transmission lines overflow occurs and how the overflow is alleviated by connecting the IPP at the congested spot in order to maximize the social welfare. The proposed method illustrated by case studies on the IEEE 30 bus and Indian utility 69 bus system.

© All Rights Reserved

- Midnight in Chernobyl: The Untold Story of the World's Greatest Nuclear Disaster
- WomanCode: Perfect Your Cycle, Amplify Your Fertility, Supercharge Your Sex Drive, and Become a Power Source
- The Hormone Reset Diet: The 21-day Diet That Resets Your Metabolism
- The Final Day: A John Matherson Novel
- Bloody Sunday: A Thriller
- Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich
- HBR's 10 Must Reads on Managing Yourself (with bonus article "How Will You Measure Your Life?" by Clayton M. Christensen)
- The Making of the Atomic Bomb
- Amity and Prosperity: One Family and the Fracturing of America
- Vermilion Drift: A Novel
- King, Warrior, Magician, Lover: Rediscovering the Archetypes of the Mature Masculine
- Chernobyl 01:23:40: The Incredible True Story of the World's Worst Nuclear Disaster
- Midnight in Chernobyl: The Story of the World's Greatest Nuclear Disaster
- The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind: Creating Currents of Electricity and Hope
- Free to Focus: A Total Productivity System to Achieve More by Doing Less
- Multipliers, Revised and Updated: How the Best Leaders Make Everyone Smarter
- Lost in the Solar System
- The Energy Bus: 10 Rules to Fuel Your Life, Work, and Team With Positive Energy
- The Subtle Body: An Encyclopedia of Your Energetic Anatomy
- University Physics

Sei sulla pagina 1di 8

Optimal Bilateral Transaction in Deregulated

Environment

Dr. S. Venkatesan P. Parvatha sundari

Professor PG Student

Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering

K.L.N. College of Engineering Sivagangai District, Tamil K.L.N. College of Engineering Sivagangai District, Tamil

Nadu India Nadu India

Abstract

In Deregulation Electricity Market, the optimal location of Independent power producer (IPP) is found by using Locational

Marginal Pricing (LMP) with Newton-Raphson Method. LMP is the most trendy congestion management technique and used to

find out the congestion charge at particular nodes based on the marginal generation cost. The aim of this paper is to maximize

the social welfare and to obtain the optimal site of IPP using an LMP and managing the transmission lines overflow while

rewarding security constraints of transmission lines in the competitive power marketplace. The LMP ranking method is used to

find out the location of IPP. This paper explains how LMP calculation is performed at each bus at which location the

transmission lines overflow occurs and how the overflow is alleviated by connecting the IPP at the congested spot in order to

maximize the social welfare. The proposed method illustrated by case studies on the IEEE 30 bus and Indian utility 69 bus

system.

Keywords: Electricity Market, Independent Power Producer (IPP), Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP), Newton-Raphson

Method, Optimal Power Flow, Social Welfare

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I. INTRODUCTION

Electric deregulation is the process of varying rules and regulations that handle the electric industry to supply customers the

choice of electricity supplier who be retailers by allowing competition. Both economic value of the production and use of

electricity is improved by deregulation. Since there is a competition in the electric industry that leads to the profit to the

consumer, so power price is likely to come down. In ancient days control of producing electrical energy with a single company

and deliver it in excess of the transmission network to Distribution Company or consumers. According to the act of public

utilities, regulatory policies Act (PURPA) was started deregulation in the year 1990 which formed a configuration of IPP

(Independent Power Producer).

In the deregulated electricity market there is a contract between the purchaser and producers in which Transmission networks

take part in a very important role in sustaining. The main drawback in transmission flow is congestion [1]. Once transmission

lines are operated above its confine, the congestion will occurs. The condition where overloads in transmission line occur are

called congestion. The system in which the security constraints in a transmission network become overloaded, then this system is

said to be in a state of congestion. The promising limits that may batter in case of congestion, bus voltage limit [2]. There are two

types of congestion management. They are uniform and non-uniform price. In this paper only considered the non uniform pricing

method is handled by means of Locational marginal pricing (LMP) is used to calculate the nodal price the marginal cost is fixed

by placing the additional MW the power can be incremented at the location without violating the protection limits and manage

transmission congestion. The LMP is termed as the minimum marginal cost to distribute an additional MW increment of power

at the spot without contravenes any system security limits [3-5]. Transmission line at the time of high price demand which lead

to the variability in LMP. If any line is constrained-LMPS will vary from bus to bus or from zone to zone, which cause

congestion is called Merit Generation Dispatch LMP is used to specify the electricity insufficiency with high LMP communicate

to make possible generation, load reduction, or more transmission capacity is essential at a given location [6-7]. LMP can be

obtained as an outcome of Optimal Power Flow (OPF) is to find by using either AC-OPF or DC-OPF [8]. The optimal

placement, including size is formulated for two different objectives, namely maximization of social welfare and profit.The

candidate spot for DG placement are known on the basis of Locational Marginal Price(LMP) [9]. This paper explains the

Optimal placement of IPP based on LMP ranking using PSO based ACOPF for optimal wheeling transaction [10]. The optimal

DG placement based on LMP ranking and consumer payment ranking, which helps in relieving congestion and minimizes the

fuel cost [11]. To minimize the total cost generation the OPF is performed by Using PSO (particle swarm optimization) which

Schedule the power [12-15]. The bilateral transaction between Independent Power Producer (IPP) and consumers will provide

the incentive of contract. An IPP consist of one or more generate units within an exacting company.

Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP) based Optimal Bilateral Transaction in Deregulated Environment

(IJSTE/ Volume 3 / Issue 08 / 020)

The bilateral transaction between Independent Power Producer (IPP) and consumers will provide the incentive of contract. An

IPP consist of one or more generate units within an exacting company ownership linked together to generate and vend electricity.

The objective of an IPP is to sell the power at favorable cost without disturbing the reliability of the system [16].

The Locational Marginal Price (LMP) at a bus signifies the cost of supply the next addition of load at that bus. It is used to

control the Transmission congestion and to find the smear price The LMP is the summation of cost of losses due to the increment

and supplying energy marginal cost, transmission congestion cost if any arising from that increment and congestion. The LMP is

the true indicator of marginal pricing of energy. The calculation of LMPs implicit involves congestion organization. Comparing

to other approaches of congestion management, LMP approach has found very wide acceptance due to its natural efficiency in

the network capacity allocation.

LMP = Energy Marginal Cost +Congestion Cost + Cost of Marginal Loss

)

It is defined as the marginal cost or the nodal price at the reference base. The nodal price of each bus shares this similar

component. These nodal prices include an inherent congestion component. At the reference bus both loss and congestion costs

are for all time zero. Hence the price of the reference bus is same as energy component.

LMPENERGY LMP i

ref

(1)

)

loss

It is defined as the marginal price of loss from the reference bus to bus i . ( LMP ) is calculated by

LMP ( DF i 1)

loss ref

LMP (2)

Where, i = number of buses

The delivery factor ( DF i ) at the i

th

bus represents the effective MW delivered to the consumers to serve the load at that bus. It

is defined as,

(3)

(4)

congestion

LMP Congestion component ( LMP )

It is defined as the marginal price of transmission Congestion from the reference bus to bus i .

M

GSF K i K (5)

congestion

LMP

k 1

Where,

K - Shadow price ($/MWh) associateed with a binding constraint.

GSF K i - Generation shift factor to line k from bus i .

M - Number of lines

Shadow Price

A binding constraint, such as, when the flow on the interface is at the limit of the interface. It is given as,

(6)

Generation Shift Factor

Generation shift factor is the fraction of incremental change in power flow of line k to change in power adding up at bus i .

1 1

( B ( a , i ) B ( b ,i ) )

GSF k 1

xk

(7)

Where,

1

B - Inverse of susceptance (B) matrix

x k - Reactance of line K

a, b, Are sending and receiving end buses on line K.

Flow of line K after outage of generator = base case flow of line GSF k i base case generation on bus i

Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP) based Optimal Bilateral Transaction in Deregulated Environment

(IJSTE/ Volume 3 / Issue 08 / 020)

To evaluate prices at each node in the base case OPF founded on the social welfare maximizing algorithm. The node with higher

LMP will constantly have first precedence for IPP placement for social welfare maximization. In this paper our objective is to

find the location of IPP and maximize the social welfare by means of Newton- Raphson method.

Objective Function

The objective function is to Find the location of IPP and Maximize the social welfare maximize The objective function denotes

the buyer benefit function at bus i (DISCO) minus Denotes the manufacturer offer bid price at bus i (GENCO).

ND NG

max B (P i Di

PDj , Buyer ) C i

( PGi ) C ( PIPPi )

i 1 i 1 (8)

Where,

C i ( PGi ) a i PGi b i PGi c i

2

2

Bi ( PDi ) - Denotes the purchaser benefit function at bus i

C i ( PGi ) - cost characteristics of Independent power producer

PDj , Buyer - Load at buyer bus i

Equality Constraints

The equality constraint is the power flow equation for solving the OPF crisis. The sum of active, reactive power and power flow

inject into a node minus the power flows take out from the node has to be zero. The power balance equation is,

PGi PDi Pi

(9)

Where, Pi- Calculated real power for the bus i .

Inequality Constraints

The inequality constraints are generation limit, voltage limit and the line flow confines and real power generation limit.

Generation Limit

Due to practical and cost-effective reasons the generating plants always have a maximum and minimum generation capacity. It is

not feasible to generate. Generators are bound to operate between the upper and lower confines for both real and reactive power

generated.

PGi PGi PGi

min max

(10)

Where,

min

PGi , Q Gi

min

Minimum real and reactive power generated at Bus i

PGi

max max

, Q Gi Maximum real and reactive power generated at Bus i

Voltage Limit

By maintaining the bus voltage within an allowable range the voltage stability can be maintained. By maintaining the system

stability the performance can be improved.

Vi Vi

min max

Vi

(11)

Where,

Vi

min Minimum or upper limit of voltage profile at Bus i

Vi

max

Maximum or upper limit of voltage profile at Bus i

Line Flow Limit

The line flow limits specify the maximum power that can be transferred via the specified transmission line using the given

conditions. The limit can be found on thermal or stability considerations.

S ij S ij

max

(12)

Where,

S ij Complex power flow in the line ij ;

max

S ij Maximum power transfer capacity of the line ij .

Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP) based Optimal Bilateral Transaction in Deregulated Environment

(IJSTE/ Volume 3 / Issue 08 / 020)

The proposed method has been established on IEEE-30 bus system and Indian utility 69 bus system. The value of nodal LMP at

each bus is calculated by using the OPF formulation of the Newton Raphson Method to determine the optimal wheeling

transaction. Using the cost curve of supplier and buyer the OPF calculated for the different electricity prices for different nodes

in the network. Using multipliers Lagrangian the nodal prices of the nonlinear equality constraints are obtained. The marginal

cost provides relieve for the congestion. The placement of IPP is identified on the basis of LMP ranking order.

The system used in this study has modified IEEE 30 bus system. It consists of 6 generators, 24 loads and 41 Transmission line.

The generator buses are 2, 3, 5, 8, 11 and 13 with a slack bus at node 1. The benefits of the bidder are the increasing function for

the supplier bids and decreasing function for the customer bids. The price difference indicates the active line constraints and

losses in the transmission system. The independent power producers are located in specific nodes and the remaining buses are

considered as load bus. The losses in the lines are neglected in the DCOPF and LMP values at each bus are equal. Although the

DCOPF model could provide a high level of power flow accuracy it has several other limitations. The main problem is there is

no well defined rule to make a unique selection of loss distribution strategy and the next issue is marginal pricing. So here AC

OPF is considered in which losses and LMP congestion cost are included in the calculation. In which the LMP values will vary

from bus to bus which cause possible congestion charges.

Case 1

In this case first consider the generator data, bus data, generator cost data and other power flow constraints of the IEEE 30 bus

system. Generator data consists of maximum and minimum value of generator and cost coefficient values of the collected data

run the Newton Raphson and obtain the LMP values from it and then check out the tolerance limit. Using Newton Raphson load

flow method the system is free from congestion for its base case which is checked by calculating complex power flow in

transmission line the value of LMP is calculated at each node. The Energy component is the same for all locations and equals to

the system balance shadow price. At the reference bus, loss factor is zero and all shift factors are zeroing so both loss and

congestion components are zero in all the time at the reference bus. At the end of result, the price of the reference bus always

equals to the energy component. LMP energy is equal to the LMP reference. Congestion components equal zero for all locations

if there are no binding constraints. The loss component is the marginal cost of additional losses caused by supply an increment of

load at the place. There is no overflow transmission line for the base due to the system is free from congestion. TABLE I show

that the LMP value at each bus is nearly same indicating that the system is free from congestion then the Transmission lines

overflow is zero for the base case. The LMP calculation is repeated for every five minutes because load connected in the power

system is dynamic. Here the objective function value is obtained as14911.360 $/hr for this base case.

Case 2

The base case load is 283.4MW is then increased to 333.4MW by increasing the load at node 9. In this case congestion occurs

due to the load connected by bus 9. The overall cost of a system also increases. Hence LMP congestion value is calculated. Now

the LMP values differ at every node as the generator contributions to each bus varies. This change in the LMP values gives the

economic signal indicating the spot of congestion. The negative value of LMP indicates that that node base lower demand

compared to generation is present at that node. The higher value of LMP indicates that more generation is pressed by demand at

that bus. The bus number 10 has higher value of LMP to all other buses which highlights the highly congested spot in the IEEE

30 bus system. This highly congested spot is well suitable for the optimal IPP placement in order to relieve the congestion in the

deregulated electricity market. In this case congestion occurs due to the load connected by bus 9 so that the Transmission line

overflow will occur in the Line number 7 and 41. In the line number 7, 160 MW wants to be transferred from the sending bus

number 4 to the ending bus number 6. Due to congestion there will be overflow and so that Instead of 160 MW there will be a

flow of 174.9714 MW, there is an additional flow of 14.9714 MW in the line number 7.Similarly in the line number 41 there will

be an overflow of 9.6238 MW. TABLE 2 shows that the overflow of Transmission line number 7 and 41 due to congestion.

Case 3

The major objective of an IPP is to sell the power at beneficial cost. Wheeling transaction is done with the added IPP and

selected consumer. Now, the IPP of 50mw is connected at the highest signal LMP value, i.e., node 10 and again with Newton

Raphson load flow method is performed. The congestion in the system is alleviated. TABLE 3 shows output of IEEE 30 bus

system. TABLE VI shows that the transmission lines overflow after locating IPP. The objective function value is increased from

16721.742 $/hr to 16775.864 $/hr for IEEE 30 bus system which in turn maximizes the social welfare in the deregulated

electricity market and also relieves the congestion using Newton-Raphson load flow method with LMP.

Table - 1

Base Case of LMP Values for IEEE 30 Bus System

Bus LMP Energy LMP Loss LMP Congestion LMP

No ($/MWh) ($/MWh) ($/MWh) ($/MWh)

1 3.086 0.0441 0 3.0827

2 3.086 0.0517 0 3.0903

3 3.086 0.0026 0 3.0412

4 3.086 0.0024 0 3.0410

Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP) based Optimal Bilateral Transaction in Deregulated Environment

(IJSTE/ Volume 3 / Issue 08 / 020)

6 3.086 0.0349 0 3.0735

7 3.086 0.0000 0 3.0386

8 3.086 0.0006 0 3.0392

9 3.086 0.0000 0 3.0386

10 3.086 0.0121 0 3.0507

11 3.086 0.0000 0 3.0386

12 3.086 0.0071 0 3.0457

13 3.086 0.0000 0 3.0386

14 3.086 0.0001 0 3.0387

15 3.086 0.0031 0 3.0417

16 3.086 0.0008 0 3.0394

17 3.086 0.0000 0 3.0386

18 3.086 0.0002 0 3.0388

19 3.086 0.0015 0 3.0401

20 3.086 0.0000 0 3.0386

21 3.086 0.0000 0 3.0386

22 3.086 0.0143 0 3.0529

23 3.086 0.0045 0 3.0431

24 3.086 0.0002 0 3.0388

25 3.086 0.0017 0 3.0403

26 3.086 0.0000 0 3.0386

27 3.086 0.0063 0 3.0449

28 3.086 0.0000 0 3.0386

29 3.086 0.0007 0 3.0393

30 3.086 0.0000 0 3.0386

In the same way the LMP is evaluated with Indian utility 69 bus system for the base case, to determine the optimal placement of

IPP. The placement and penetration of Indian utility 69 system are obtained from the OPF with Newton Raphson Method. This

Indian utility 69 bus system has 13 generators, 99 transmission lines, 56 loads.

Case 1

In this Case first consider the generator data, bus data, generator cost data and other power flow constraints of the Indian utility

69 bus system. From the collected data run the Newton- Raphson method and obtain the LMP values from it and then check out

the tolerance limits. The system is free from the congestion in the base case of Indian utility 69 bus system and the transmission

line overflow is zero in the base case which is checked by calculating complex power flow method.

Case 2

In this case by increasing the 80 Mw load at node 20. The congestion occurs due to the load connected by bus 20 the overall cost

of a system also increases. Hence LMP congestion value is calculated. Now the LMP values differ at every node as the generator

Contributions to each bus varies. It is seen that the LMP at the bus number 37 has the highest value which indicated the spots of

congestion. The value of LMP is 53.3494 $/Mwh. In the line number 4, 90.008 MW wants to be transferred from the sending bus

number 4 to the ending bus number 6. Due to congestion there will be overflow and so that Instead of 90.008 MW there will be a

flow of 90.008 MW, there is additional flow of 0.008 MW in the line number 4.Tabulated transmission lines over flow after

congestion.

Table - 2

Transmission Lines Overflow for IEEE 30 Bus After Adding 50 Mw Load At Bus Number 9

Bus No Send Bus End Bus Line Limits Line Flow Over Flow

1 1 2 13.0000 63.1717 0

2 1 3 13.0000 27.0639 0

3 2 4 65.0000 27.0639 0

4 3 4 130.0000 15.0288 0

5 2 5 130. 0000 45.5235 0

6 2 6 65. 0000 40.6762 0

7 4 6 160. 0000 174.9714 14.9714

8 5 7 70. 0000 19.7976 0

9 6 7 130. 0000 116.7266 0

10 6 8 62. 0000 58.3503 0

11 6 9 85. 0000 52.7723 0

12 6 10 32. 0000 22.5804 0

13 9 11 65. 0000 27.3469 0

14 9 10 65. 0000 14.9008 0

15 4 12 65. 0000 14.5123 0

Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP) based Optimal Bilateral Transaction in Deregulated Environment

(IJSTE/ Volume 3 / Issue 08 / 020)

17 12 14 32. 0000 8.8594 0

18 12 15 32. 0000 21.6334 0

19 12 16 32. 0000 15.6957 0

20 14 15 16. 0000 2.3239 0

21 16 17 16. 0000 12.1439 0

22 15 18 16. 0000 11.4853 0

23 18 19 16. 0000 8.3554 0

24 19 20 32. 0000 5.6703 0

25 10 20 32. 0000 7.2875 0

26 10 17 32. 0000 8.5025 0

27 10 21 32. 0000 16.5641 0

28 10 22 32. 0000 7.0553 0

29 21 22 32. 0000 5.5416 0

30 15 23 16. 0000 5.4971 0

31 22 24 16. 0000 4.8420 0

32 23 24 16. 0000 2.9271 0

33 24 25 16. 0000 11.3881 0

34 25 26 16. 0000 4.2653 0

35 25 27 16. 0000 14.3715 0

36 28 27 65. 0000 31.0286 0

37 27 29 90. 0000 29.6838 0

38 27 30 16. 0000 7.0910 0

39 29 30 19. 0000 17.9817 0

40 8 28 32. 0000 0.7126 0

41 6 28 110. 0000 119.6238 9.6238

Table - 3

Social Welfare Output for IEEE 30 Bus Systems

After adding 50MW load at bus number 9 Social Welfare=16721.742($/hr)

Aft After Locating 50MW of IPP at bus number 10 Social Welfare=16775.864($/hr)

Table - 4

Transmission Lines Flow for IEEE 30 Bus System after Locating 50 Mw of IPP at Bus Number 10

Bus No Send Bus End Bus Line Limits Line Flow Over Flow

1 1 2 13.0000 38.8887 0

2 1 3 13.0000 10.6127 0

3 2 4 65.0000 4.7358 0

4 3 4 130.0000 9.1019 0

5 2 5 130. 0000 39.3489 0

6 2 6 65. 0000 34.9552 0

7 4 6 160. 0000 156.9678 0

8 5 7 70. 0000 25.8540 0

9 6 7 130. 0000 114.0239 0

10 6 8 62. 0000 52.3589 0

11 6 9 85. 0000 31.6241 0

12 6 10 32. 0000 12.0596 0

13 9 11 65. 0000 24.1819 0

14 9 10 65. 0000 17.3494 0

15 4 12 65. 0000 1.3281 0

16 12 13 65. 0000 47.1299 0

17 12 14 32. 0000 7.9240 0

18 12 15 32. 0000 17.8279 0

19 12 16 32. 0000 7.1593 0

20 14 15 16. 0000 1.4717 0

21 16 17 16. 0000 3.6271 0

22 15 18 16. 0000 6.1326 0

23 18 19 16. 0000 3.0570 0

24 19 20 32. 0000 7.9804 0

25 10 20 32. 0000 10.4019 0

26 10 17 32. 0000 8.6590 0

27 10 21 32. 0000 16.5848 0

28 10 22 32. 0000 7.0397 0

29 21 22 32. 0000 10.4019 0

30 15 23 16. 0000 8.6590 0

Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP) based Optimal Bilateral Transaction in Deregulated Environment

(IJSTE/ Volume 3 / Issue 08 / 020)

32 23 24 16. 0000 2.7427 0

33 24 25 16. 0000 9.0171 0

34 25 26 16. 0000 4.2653 0

35 25 27 16. 0000 12.2215 0

36 28 27 65. 0000 23.3874 0

37 27 29 90. 0000 29.6839 0

38 27 30 16. 0000 7.0913 0

39 29 30 19. 0000 17.9815 0

40 8 28 32. 0000 0.7032 0

41 6 28 110. 0000 109.4275 0

Case 3

Hence IPP is connected by bus 37 and Newton-Raphson is performed again to relieve the spot of congestion for the optimal

bilateral transaction. Tabulate the LMP values after locating IPP. This scheduling will also consider the generator cost and

transmission line limits. Transmission lines overflow is zero after adding IPP. It maximizes the social welfare in the deregulated

electricity market and also relieves the congestion using Newton-Raphson load flow method with LMP. The objective function

value is increased from 806522.696 $/hr to 806525.339 $/hr for Indian utility 69 bus system. TABLE V indicates social welfare

output for Indian utility 69 bus system.

Table - 5

Social Welfare Output for Indian Utility 69 Bus System

After adding 80 MW load at bus number 20 Socialwelfare=806522.696($/hr)

After Locating 80MW of IPP at bus number 37 SocialWelfare=806525.339($/hr)

V. CONCLUSION

The proposed method could specially identify the feasible transaction for the optimal placement of IPP and also maximize the

social welfare using OPF with Newton-Raphson load flow method. The LMP plays an important role in the deregulation

electricity market. In recent times LMP is set to be the most popular congestion management technique. The transition from

monopoly to deregulated market is found to be more advantageous. It has certain drawbacks of congestion and difficulty in

pricing. In this work the Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP) can be proved to be an effective solution for feasible transaction in

relieving congestion. LMP also used to maintain the stable operation of the transmission system without affecting the buyers and

sellers in the market. LMP based market mechanism increases the efficiency of a competitive wholesale energy market. The

LMP values are calculated for IEEE 30 and Indian utility 69 bus system in order to minimize the congestion. LMP serves as the

best economic signal in identifying the congested spot. The location of IPP at the higher LMP node relieves the congestion. The

Increase in LMP values provides good signal for identifying the congested location and also provides the suitable location for

IPP which relieves the congestion and provides optimum wheeling transaction and Maximize the social welfare for bilateral

transaction.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors are grateful to the principal and management of K.L.N. College of Engineering, Madurai for providing all facilities

for the Research work

REFERENCES

[1] M. Murali, M. Sailaja kumar, M. Sydulu, Optimal spot pricing in electricity market with inelastic load using constrained bat algorithm, ELSEVIER on

Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 2014, Vol. 62, pp. 897-911

[2] Muhammad Bachtiar Nappu, Ardiaty Arief, Ramesh C.Bansal Transmission management for congested power system: A review of concepts, technical

challenges and development of a new methodology, ELSEVIER on Renewable and Sustainable energy reviews, Vol. 38, 2014, pp. 572 580.

[3] Tina Orfanogianni and George Gross, Fellow, IEEE, A General Formulation for LMP Evaluation, IEEE transactions on power systems, vol. 22, no. 3,

August 2007.

[4] Mohammad Shahidehpour, Hatim Yamin, Zuyi Li, Market operation in electric power systems operations Forecasting, Scheduling and Risk

Management. 2002.

[5] G.Hamoud and I. Bradley, Assessment of transmission congestion cost and Locational marginal pricing in a competitive electricity market, IEEE

Transactions on power systems, vol. 19, No. 2, 2004, pp. 769 775.

[6] Geoffrey McD.Lewis, Estimating the value of Wind energy using electricity Locational Marginal Price ELSEVIER on Energy Policy, 2010, Vol.38 pp.

3221 3231.

[7] V.Sarkar, S.A.Khaparde, Optimal LMP decomposition for the ACOPF calculation, IEEE Transactions on Power systems, Vol.26, No.3, 2011, pp.1714-

1723.

[8] Durga Gautam, Nadarajah Mithulananthan Optimal DG placement in deregulated electricity market ELSEVIER on Electrical Power systems research

,vol. 77, 2007, pp. 1627-1636

[9] S.Venkatesan, N.Kamaraj, Deregulated environment IPP selection wheeling transaction, Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 2013.

[10] B.Mohan, M.V.Ramesh, Optimal DG placement under standard market design using GA IEEE conference on Emerging trends in Electrical

Engineering and Engineering management,2012, pp.148-153.

Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP) based Optimal Bilateral Transaction in Deregulated Environment

(IJSTE/ Volume 3 / Issue 08 / 020)

[11] M.A.Abido, (2013) Optimal Power Flow Solution Using Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm, ELSEVIER on Electrical Power and Energy Systems,

Vol.24, pp.563-576.

[12] Richard d. Christie, Bruce f. wollenberg, Ivar wangensteen, Transmission Management in the Deregulated Environment, proceedings of the IEEE, Vol.

88, No.2, 2000, pp.170-195.

[13] Sudipta Dutta, S.P.Singh, Optimal Rescheduling of Generator for Congestion Management Based on Particle Swarm Optimization IEEE Transactions

on Power systems,Vol. 23, No.4, 2008, pp.1560-1569.

[14] Belgin Emre, Rengin Idil, Optimal power flow solution using Particle swarm optimization algorithm, IEEE 2013.

[15] Yong Fu, Zuyi Li, Different Models and Properties on LMP Calculations, IEEE conference, Power Engineering Society Meeting on 2006.

[16] Okada, K.; Asano, H.; Yokoyama, R.; Niimura, T., "Reliability based impact analysis of independent power producers for power system operations under

deregulation," Electrical and Computer Engineering, 1999 IEEE Canadian Conference on,vol.3,

- Ferranti effect PracticalCaricato daKishor Bhamare
- Power Efficiency Guide ReviewCaricato daPhaisarn Samarnphong
- 6- Power Trading Subject to Transmission ConstraintsCaricato daSari M.I
- chille experienceCaricato daapi-3697505
- Lecture 2- Electricity System in SocietyCaricato daglenlcy
- Advanced Monitoring of Icing TROPPAUER Et Al IWAIS TemplateCaricato daМихаил Лелеков
- Assignment-2 Problems on Electricity Market Operations.pdfCaricato daAhmed Khairi
- Paper Word V4 InglésCaricato daJuan Francisco Arriaza Muñoz
- 5266347Caricato dacastrojp
- Tranmission loss allocation by conductor renting method.pptCaricato daPrathap Reddy
- Impact of Security on Power Systems OperationCaricato daUmmu Shofiyyah Shafra
- pc_2013_05_elec__Caricato daBruegel
- 4India-Shahidehpour Pp RefCaricato daMuqthiar Ali
- Utilities PrimerCaricato daFarhan Ahmed
- ETSO Transmission 0406Caricato daRemus Samoila
- A RELIABILITY BASED APPROACH FOR OPTIMAL TRANSMISSION USAGE AND LOSS ALLOCATIONCaricato daAnonymous LSebPS
- RT -2 Interruption Circle Monthly Interruption Details July 2019Caricato daManushree Cn Shankar
- MidAmerican Energy Co - March 2017 Fuel Adjustment ClauseCaricato daGenability
- TLA Descargadores para Líneas de TransmisiónCaricato daFaVCM
- TEED_EN_3_8Caricato daJose
- Performance Evaluation of Mho and Quadrilateral Characteristic Relay on UPFC Incorporated Transmission LineCaricato daRendieRamadhan
- B4_201_2012Caricato daAnonymous NGXdt2Bx
- UntitledCaricato daeurolex
- Grid Failure 2012Caricato daabc_123_mno2015
- CEA Report on Failure of Transmission Towers - Oct 2016 to Mar 2018Caricato dasanjeevpnd439
- P099234 AFR Monitoring Performance of Electric Utilities Tallapragada 0Caricato daQais Alsafasfeh
- Securing the Power Grid White PaperCaricato daSidraYousuf
- SHE Transmission Losses Strategy October 2016 Update Appendix 1Caricato damohitchowdary
- GSU_low res.pdfCaricato daNinh Quoc Trung
- Ganz PresentationCaricato daeganz111

- A Cloud Based Healthcare Services For Remote PlacesCaricato daIJSTE
- Optimization of Overall Efficiency using Facilities Planning in Ropp Cap Making IndustryCaricato daIJSTE
- Design and Analysis of Magneto Repulsive Wind TurbineCaricato daIJSTE
- FPGA Implementation of High Speed Floating Point Mutliplier using Log Based DesignCaricato daIJSTE
- Research on Storage Privacy via Black Box and Sanitizable SignatureCaricato daIJSTE
- Automatic Generation Control in Three-Area Power System Operation by using “Particle Swarm Optimization Technique”Caricato daIJSTE
- Partial Replacement of Fine Aggregate with Iron Ore Tailings and Glass PowderCaricato daIJSTE
- Multipurpose Scheme of Workshop Exhaust System for Ventilation and Electrical Power GenerationCaricato daIJSTE
- RFID Based Toll Gate AccessCaricato daIJSTE
- Optimization of Treatability by FACCO for Treatment of Chemical Industry EffluentCaricato daIJSTE
- Effect of RIB Orientation in Isogrid Structures: Aerospace ApplicationsCaricato daIJSTE
- Development of Relationship Between Saturation Flow and Capacity of Mid Block Section of urban Road - A Case Study of Ahmedabad CityCaricato daIJSTE
- A Mixture of Experts Model for ExtubationCaricato daIJSTE
- A Comprehensive Survey of Techniques/Methods For Content Based Image Retrieval SystemCaricato daIJSTE
- The Bicycle as a Mode Choice – A Gendered ApproachCaricato daIJSTE
- Enriching Gum Disease Prediction using Machine LearningCaricato daIJSTE
- Optimum Placement of DG Units using CPF MethodCaricato daIJSTE
- A Radar Target Generator for Airborne TargetsCaricato daIJSTE
- An Implementation and Design a Customized Advanced Image Editor using Image Processing in MatlabCaricato daIJSTE
- Comparative Study and Analysis of PCC Beam and Reinforced Concrete Beam using GeogridCaricato daIJSTE
- Onerider the Bike TaxiCaricato daIJSTE
- App-Based Water Tanker Booking, Monitoring & Controlling SystemCaricato daIJSTE
- Analytical Study on Method of Solving Polynomial InequalitiesCaricato daIJSTE
- Wireless Information Process and Power Transfer in Single-User OFDM SystemCaricato daIJSTE
- Interstage Construction Techniques for Mass Gain: An OverviewCaricato daIJSTE
- Using the Touch-Screen Images for Password-based Authentication of IlliteratesCaricato daIJSTE
- Optimizing Turning Process for EN43 by Taguchi Method under Various Machining ParametersCaricato daIJSTE
- Technology Advancement for Abled PersonCaricato daIJSTE
- Duplicate Detection using AlgorithmsCaricato daIJSTE
- An Implementation of Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithms for Photovoltaic Systems using Matlab and Arduino based RTOS systemCaricato daIJSTE

- Data Transfer Through SkinCaricato daManjusha Jaan
- B2.3482-1Caricato daAlejandro Valdés Rojas
- 1.Electromgnetic Performances Analysis of a New MPGPM BL for HEVs - CópiaCaricato daIInadaII
- Density of StatesCaricato davicky_ani1986
- Thermo Formula SheetCaricato dadoubletapr
- Theorems of Sylvester and SchurCaricato daanon020202
- E-110 Feed Overhead ExchangerCaricato daTahir Mahmood
- ResistorsCaricato daNOVAECE
- Sc Question BankCaricato daVenkatGolla
- Application on Linear Diophantine EquationsCaricato daHazel Clemente Carreon
- 2 MarksCaricato daSanthosh Sivaraj
- An Improved Real-Time Adaptive KF With Recursive Noise Covariance Updating RulesCaricato danadamau22633
- Opengamma Local VolCaricato daGibreelChamcha
- Computational Fluid DynamicsCaricato daFlorica Balog
- coke drum reliabilityCaricato daMahendra Rathore
- Doctoral Thesis by Phd_Javier SantaolallaCaricato daedsondidier
- J. Nucl. Med. Technol. 2007 Goldman 115 28Caricato daRuxandra Lúthien
- Truss Frame v1Caricato daAbhinandan Sharma
- ECE 334 Lecture 20 CMOS NoisemarginnCaricato daDare Dharan
- mmdschemesyllCaricato dabharathvg8096
- ONGC Mechanical Question PaperCaricato daPrabhu Charan Teja
- O. Serra_ the Interpretation of Logging Data_1986Caricato dac_b_umashankar
- A Zorin Molina 2008Caricato dacbfodrtf
- Properties of Predicates JadiCaricato daAfita Prastiwi
- Structural Performance of Reinforced Concrete Flat Plat BuildingsCaricato daJoshua Manggala
- Nas107 Optimization SeminarCaricato dasuhas110
- 23SeriesandParallelCircCaricato daAshley O'Neal
- ITAL000002_Water Treatment DQ2040!50!60Caricato daLê Công
- An Introduction to PressureCaricato dahraju_b
- Touran FuseboxCaricato daRiki Nurzaman

## Molto più che documenti.

Scopri tutto ciò che Scribd ha da offrire, inclusi libri e audiolibri dei maggiori editori.

Annulla in qualsiasi momento.