Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Our assignment comprises four parts. In table 1, we categorize all the requests in the emails. In table 2, we do a simple statistics of the
frequency of three categories of directness and syntactic and lexical modifiers between native speakers and non-native speakers. Then
we do some analysis based on these two tables. In the last part, we discuss about how the non-native speakers use sub-request to
Table 1.
4 Today, I am writing to ask you a Direct Want Statement: I would like (syntactic modifiers- past
permission to take internship next Today, I am writing tense) to take internship course in
semester (syntactic modifiers- Spring. How can I register the course?
progressive aspect) to
I'm afraid that Dr. Soandso ask you a permission to
forwarded my email to you. take internship next
I would like to take internship course semester
in Spring. How can I register the
course?
5 I would like to ask you if I can have Direct Want Statement:
an extension of my paper I would (syntactic
modifier-past tense) like
to ask you if I can
(lexical modifier-
consultative devices)
have an extension of my
paper
They are not able to do the So I would like (syntactic modifier- They are not able to do
interviews until this Friday. Because past tense) to ask you if I can (lexical the interviews until
one of the excerpts I used was modifier-consultative devices) hand in this Friday. Because
from one of these two participants ' my paper next Monday (Specific date). one of the excerpts I
(activity), used was from one of
these two participants '
So I would like to ask you if I can (activity),
hand in my paper next Monday
(Specific date).
6 so hope to apply for the position. So I was wondering (syntactic so hope to apply for
But the problem is it requires three modifier-present progressive, lexical the position. But the
letters of recommendation. modifier-subjectivizer) if I could problem is it requires
So I was wondering if I could ask you (syntactic modifier- past tense, lexical three letters of
to write a recommendation letter for modifier- consultative devices) ask recommendation.
me. you to write a recommendation letter
for me.
Direct Expectation
Statement:
If you could (syntactic,
past tense, consultative
devices) get back to me
with a date or time that
would be good for you.
I hope (lexical
modifiesr-subjectivisier,
consultative devices)
that you will be able to
do it for me.
10 I just wanted to write to you to ask if I just wanted (syntactic modifier-past
you would be so kind as to write a tense, lexical modifier-subjectivizer) to
letter of recommendation for me. write to you to ask if you (lexical
modifier-consultative devices) would
be (syntactic modifier-past tense) so
kind (lexical modifier-uptoner) as to
write a letter of recommendation for
me.
I would so greatly appreciate it if you I would (syntactic modifier-past tense)
would send a letter to me that I can so greatly appreciate (lexical modifier-
add to my repertoire. uptoner) it if you would (syntactic
modifier-past tense) send a letter to
me (via e-mail or regular post) that I
can add to my repertoire.
Table II.
From the table 1, we can see that all request sentences fit into the existing categories-direct, conventionally indirect and hint. However,
the categories of direct, indirect and hint dont cover all the requests. So some new sub-categories were added. All the emails include
requests with different level of directness. We cannot attribute the levels of directness to either the influence of syntactical or lexical
aspects. From table 1, we can see the syntactic and lexical modifiers work together to mitigate the effect of imposition. This mitigation
makes these requests show more characteristics of direct request, indirect request, and hint. With the information we get, we do our
From the readers perspective, first we read the ten emails and figure out the main requests according to the different meanings and
contexts. When we have all the requests, we use the coding categories developed by Blum-Kulka, House, and Kasper (1989) for the
CCSARP project, and put the main requests in the emails into three different categories. The three main categories are direct,
conventionally indirect and hint, and we also added direct question for request, mediation of positive and negative, and strong
expectation as sub-categories into the category of conventionally indirect. The following are the three examples: How can I register
the course (direct question request)? If you say "no" I can totally understand, but if you accepted me in Independent Study (mediation
or balance between the positive and negative, not too face threatening). I could leave it in your mailbox, or send it as an email
attachment (strong expectation by providing options and show politeness). The different ways of imposition of requests reveal
different levels of directness. Then within each distinct category, we analyzed the request sentences into levels of syntactic and lexical
modifiers, which the writers use to mediate the effect of directness. When analyzing the syntactic and lexical modifiers, we also add
uptoners into the lexical modifiers. Here are the examples: I just wanted to write to you to ask if you would be so kind (uptoners) as
to write a letter of recommendation for me. I think that you have experience with both my language skills and my teaching skills, and I
would so greatly appreciate (uptoners) it if you would send a letter to me (via email or regular post) that I can add to my repertoire. If
you say "no" I can totally (uptoners) understand, but if you accepted me in Independent Study.
From writers perspective, we try to figure out the differences between native-speakers and non-native speakers especially the process
of thinking and writing. Firstly, as what we can see from table 2, the non-native speakers use more hints than native speakers. In four
emails of the native speakers, zero hint is used. In six emails of the non-native speakers, four emails use hints (The hints include 7
sentences). The non-native speakers prefer to talk about the backgrounds, histories and reasons before they propose requests. For
example, in second e-mail, the student writes As you know I have been sick during the final 3 weeks, it implies that he doesnt try
his best when he writes the proposal. Therefore, he asks the professor to regrade his proposal. In contrast, native speakers are willing
to make request in the beginning of the email. For instance, in email 8, the student writes Could I turn in my paper for qualitative
research on Monday?. He just proposes the request directly without providing any hints. We guess the difference between native-
speakers and native speakers may influenced by their own culture. For example, non-native speakers might think using hints is polite
and acceptable while non-native speakers believe that making request without hint will meet professors expectation.
Secondly, the non-native speakers use more syntactic and lexical modifiers than native speakers when they make indirect requests,
from table 2, we can see that non-native speakers may spend more time on lexicons and syntactic for appropriateness and politeness in
specific contexts in which professors and students own different powers during interaction. They may feel nervous and confused when
they make requests for professor because they are not confident with their English proficiency and they are not familiar with American
culture. In contrast, for native speakers, they may not think much about syntactic and lexical components. Since they have higher level
of English proficiency and they know American culture well. They feel more confident for the usage of lexicons and syntactic and
When imposing requests, non-native speakers try to be euphemistic and express their meaning in an indirect way. In email 1, when the
student gives hint first, then proposes his/her main request indirectly, and finally proposes another two requests to further explain the
purpose, which is a salient characteristic of non-native speakers. For example, Now I'm thinking about registering for 3 credits in an
Independent Study instead (hint). Would you please think about the possibility of taking me as a student in an Indepedent Study with
you? (main request). I also need some guidance with my MA paper, a professor to review my writings and guide me through the paper
(request 2). If you say "no" I can totally understand, but if you accepted me in Independent Study, would you please tell me about the
rules of Independent Study, such as how I will be graded, how often we should meet, etc. (request 3)