Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
(SCE)
DEPT. OF CIVIL ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY
I, hereby confess that I have prepared this report on my own effort. I also admit not
to receive or give any help during the preparation of this report and pledge
that everything mentioned in the report is true.
_________________
Student Signature
Name :
Matric No. :
Date :
FACULTY: ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY PAGE NO.: 1/7
DEPARTMENT: CIVIL ENGINEERING EDITION:
TECHNOLOGY
REVIEW NO.:
EFFECTIVE 1/01/14
TEST TITLE : DRY SIEVE ANALYSIS DATE:
AMENDMENT 1/01/15
DATE:
1.0 OBJECTIVE
The sieve analysis determines the grain size distribution curve of soil sample by passing them
through a stack of sieves of decreasing mesh opening sizes and by measuring the weight retained
on each sieve. The sieve analysis is generally applied to the soil fraction larger than 75m.
3.0 THEORY
(BS1377 : Part 2:1990:9.3), Sieving can be performed in either wet or dry conditions. Dry
sieving is used only for soil with a negligible amount of plastic fines such as gravels and clean
sands, where as wet sieving is applied to soils with plastic fines. According to the British
Standard, dry sieving may be carried out only on materials for which this procedure gives the
same results as the wet-sieving procedure. This means that it is applicable only to clean
granular materials, which usually implies clean sandy or gravelly soils that is, soils containing
negligible amounts of particles of silt or clay size. Normally the wet-sieving procedure should
be followed for all soils. If particles of medium gravel size or larger are present in significant
amounts, the initial size of the sample required may be such that riffling is necessary at some
stage to reduce the sample to a manageable size for fine sieving.
FACULTY: ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY PAGE NO.: 2/7
DEPARTMENT: CIVIL ENGINEERING EDITION:
TECHNOLOGY
REVIEW NO.:
EFFECTIVE 1/01/14
TEST TITLE : DRY SIEVE ANALYSIS DATE:
AMENDMENT 1/01/15
DATE:
BS 1377: 1990, allows either wet or dry sieving to be used, but the wet method is preferred. After
oven drying, the test sample mass is determine before being separated into two parts, the first
comprises that retained on a 20 mm sieve and the second that passing 20 mm. That greater than 20
mm is dry sieves, while that smaller is wet sieve prior to being re-sieved dry. The sieves used are
generally chosen from the range (in mm) of 75, 63, 50, 37.5, 28, 20, 14, 10, 63.5, 3.35, 2, 1.18, 0.6,
0.425, 0.3, 0.212, 0.15 and 0.063. The mass retained on each sieve is recorded, from which the
percentage of the sample passing each sieve can be calculated. Material passing the 63 micron
(0.063 mm) sieve is retained for a fine particle analysis, if the amount justifies the further test. The
combined results of the coarse and fine analyses are plotted on a semi-logarithmic graph of the form
show in Figure 1.0, to give the particle size distribution curve.
1. Series of standard sieves with opening ranging from 7.5cm to 75m including a cover plate and
bottom pan.
2. Test sieve having the following aperture size 10mm, 6mm, 1mm, 0.6mm, 0.3mm, 0.15mm,
0.063 mm.
3. Mechanical sieve shaker
4. Balances sensitive 0.5g
5. Soft wire brush
5.0 PROCEDURES
1. Oven dry the sample, allow it to cool and measure its weight.
2.Select a stack of sieves suitable to the soil being tested. A stack of six or seven sieves is
generally sufficient for most soil and applications. The top sieves soil should have and
opening slightly larger than the largest particles. Arrange the stack of sieves so that the
largest mesh opening is at the top and the smallest is at the bottom.
3.Attach a pan at the bottom of the sieve stack. Pour the sample on the top sieve. Add the cover
plate to avoid dust and loss of particles while shaking.
5.Remove the stack of sieves from the shaker. Beginning with the top sieve, transfer its contents
to a piece of the paper or a larger recipient. Carefully empty the sieve without losing any
material, and use a brush to remove grains stuck in its mesh opening. Measure the weight of
soil retained in each sieve and notes the corresponding sieve mesh opening and number.
Figure 4: The soil particles stuck in the mesh opening of the sieves are removed with a brush
6.Repeat step 5 for each sieve. As a preliminary check, the weights retained on all the sieves
and the bottom pan are added, and their sum is compared to the initial sample weight. Both
weights should be within about 1% if the difference is greater than 1% too much material
was lost and weighing and or sieves should be repeated.
EFFECTIVE 1/01/14
TEST TITLE : DRY SIEVE ANALYSIS DATE:
AMENDMEN 1/01/15
T DATE:
Sieve BS (mm) Mass Retained (g) Mass Passing (g) % finer by weight
5.00 0.0 0.0 100
2.00 0.0 115.5 100
1.180 5.5 110.0 95
0.600 25.7 84.3 73
0.425 23.1 61.2 53
0.300 22.0 39.2 34
0.212 17.3 21.9 19
0.150 12.7 9.2 8
0.63 6.9 2.3 2
Pan 2.3
2
d
Cc 30 =___________.
d 60 d10
FACULTY: ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY PAGE NO.: 7/7
DEPARTMENT: CIVIL ENGINEERING EDITION:
TECHNOLOGY
REVIEW NO.:
EFFECTIVE 1/01/14
TEST TITLE : DRY SIEVE ANALYSIS DATE:
AMENDMENT 1/01/15
DATE:
8.0 QUESTIONS :