ABSTRACT

Development of Avalon
Profit in Baltia's
Field offshore
163.33
developmentmil. Less than case 1
field of Agartha has
development been planned.
dollars D. Prod. Of
& 3 for Avalon E. Agartha's F. Kolob's G. Ship planning
profit:Agartha
B.
A.Year
No. C. No. of wells on prod. each sale(Mm3) sale(Mm3)(70% to Agartha only
of year(Mm3) (30%of D.) of D.) (Capacity, Trips)
No.
wells
Economic analysis
Target
WellMarkets
Count &&plan Q2 oftimeline
development
of transportation
Q1 Q3 Q4
1 the prominent0 cases:
1 3 5 19.77 5.931 13.839 (11,1)
2 Case 5 1. FLNG
8 11re- 14 17 109.35 32.805 76.545 (11,5)
gasified in Agartha
3 17 20 23 26 29 210.045 63.0135 147.0315 (11,10)
and set via buried
4 pipeline
29 to Kolob
32 35 38 41 312.78 93.834 218.946 (11,14),(3.3,1)
5 Case41 2. 44Pipeline
47 50 53 411.72 123.516 288.204 (11,19)
6 (subsea)
53 to 56 56 & 56
Agartha 56 468.825 140.6475 328.1775 (11,21),(3.3,1)
7 sent 56 via 57 buried
57 57 58 469.465 140.8395 328.6255 (11,21),(3.3,1)
8 pipeline
58 to Kolob
58 58 58 59 467.89 140.367 327.523 (11,21),(3.3,1)
9 Case593. Pipeline
59 59for 60 60 468.664 140.5992 328.0648 (11,21),(3.3,1)
10 Kolob60and 60
FLNG60for 60 60 462.1275 138.6383 323.48925 (11,21)
11 Agartha
60 shows:
60 60 60 60 451.0675 135.3203 315.74725 (11,21)
12 60 60 60 60 60 440.025 132.0075 308.0175 (11,20)
Subsea pipeline(Avalon-Kolob)
4291.729 ~241 mil. $ ~779 mil. $
Surface facilities Capacities
Total Rev. = 1020 mil. $
Subsea Pipeline(on 0.91
Seabed) Mm3/day
0.91
Gas Processing Plant Mm3/day

Surface Facilities placement for Case 3 economics

600
400

Production Rate (million m3/year)

FLNG 200 Avalon for Agartha
from
0
Surface facilities Capacities
10
FLNG Processing
0 0.39 Mm3/day
Plant(offshore)
Years 11,000 m3 &
Still in plateau Period of Ships 3300 m3
production Regasifiation 11,000 m 3
Cases Profit
Key risks technical and non-tehnical and577
Plant(onshore) theirmil
mitigation steps
Case 1
$
17 mil.
Case 2
Risks $ Mitigation Steps
Storage and handling of cryogenic fluid at -1600C. Intensive monitoring and control is required for
325
Case 3
mil. $processing and transportation of LNG.
Fluid is odourless, hence, difficult to detect leaks on Installation of fire-fighting facilities and proper
personnel basis. communication with Coast Guards.
Technical

Fire hazards while handling flammable LNG.
Can cause cryogenic burns to operating personnel.
LNG spill and its sudden vapour conversion can cause
explosion, thus damaging oceans pristine ecology.
Corrosion & Leakage is difficult to control in deep sub-
sea pipeline.
Technical
Use of PPE(Personal Protective Equipment) to
avoid injuries.
Surveillance of sub-sea pipeline for leakage
detection.
Consensus with Agartha government.

Geopolitical risk- Contractual agreement with Kolob

Non-

Laying sub-sea pipeline in International waters. government allowing uninterrupted gas

import of at least 330 million m3 per year
irrespective of relations with Agartha.

Key stakeholders and their management

Stakeholder Management
 Government and people of
Agartha
Local fishing community
Local Contractors
Kolob Government
Company shareholders and
Employees
Establishing training institutes and conducting workshops to develop skilled
human resource.
Job opportunities to fishing community and local people in production and
marketing sectors.
Involving local contractors in infrastructure development and production.
Developing Kolob gas market through gas imports.
Optimum wages and dividends.