Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Introduction:
Typo-Squatting is a type of Cybersquatting method aimed at targeting
novice net users who accidentally type in the target website URL
incorrectly in the browser address or search bar. This is usually aimed at
redirecting the traffic of a popular website generated by genuine internet
users who have unknowingly made a typo error in querying for their target
website. [1]
For example, instead of typing in www.microsoft.com, the user
mistakenly types in wwwmicrosoft.com or mikrosoft.com or micro-
soft.com or microosoft.com or mircosoft.com or micosoft.com, etc
which take the user to another website, which may even look like the
original Microsoft website but is actually owned and operated by other
people with the sole aim to hijack the traffic going to the original
www.microsoft.com website and either redirect the traffic to competing
websites and/or sell competing products & services, deceive unsuspecting
users into entering their personal/login information (phishing), making the
unsuspecting visitors participating in fake surveys and lucky draws, deploy
malicious software to spread malware and steal business sensitive
information, blackmail the original website owner, etc. [2]
Some Solutions:
As they say Prevention is better than cure, the first step would be to
implement all the solutions we have already discussed under the section
of proactive steps to take. The first steps would be to buy as many
domains names that might be possibly interest typo-squatters. The
website registration information provided should belong to the owner.
Appropriate Trademark & Copyright protection steps should also be taken.
Another offbeat solution proposed by Alex Tajirian, CEO at DomainMart is
to incentivize the typo-squatter for redirecting traffic from the typo
domain to the original site. This would be like buying traffic from the
competing typo-site to redirect the web users to the correct site. But,
many people see this solution akin to incentivising criminals to turn good
and stop resorting to blackmailing since the traffic would have originally
landed to the correct website had the competing typo site not been taken
by the typo-squatter. [5]
Additionally, Government regulatory authorities should step in and take
strong action against the people intentionally running typo-squatting sites
just like UK Watchdog took action against the companies running the fake
sites, wikapedia.com and twtter.com.
Conclusion:
Typo-Squatting is a threat to any business which depends significantly on
online traffic. Not only can this impact the visitors coming to the website,
but also impact the brand name, credibility and financial bottom-line of
the company. Out of all the proposed solutions (Arbitration, Lawsuit or
Out-of-court settlement), which solution should be pursued is best left to
the website owner to decide. Every solution would end up costing them
time and money eventually, and they need to decide which route to take
to deal with typo-squatters since at the end of the day it will be a loss to
the website owners.
References:
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typo-Squatting
2. https://securingtomorrow.mcafee.com/consumer/family-safety/what-is-
typo-squatting/
3. http://www.inc.com/guides/201102/how-to-protect-your-domain-name-
from-cybersquatting.html
4. https://thenextweb.com/insider/2012/02/16/typo-squatting-sites-
wikapedia-and-twtter-have-been-fined-300000-by-uk-
watchdog/#.tnw_BPhJbdLR
5. http://www.circleid.com/posts/typo-squatting_a_solution/
6. https://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/09/04/worlds_most_notorious_cybersqu
atter_arrested/
7. https://umbrella.cisco.com/blog/blog/2016/02/25/typo-squatting-on-the-
2016-presidential-campaign-trail/
8. http://aliasencore.com/services/defensive-registration