Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Stage Subject
University Tutor
Prof. Ing. Francesca Verga
Division Exploration & Production
Dept. SPEO/COMP
Master Ingegneria
g g del Petrolio 2006-2007
G R O U P
Summaryy
9Description of traditional systems of artificial lift ( piston type
pumps, jet pumps, rod pumps, progressive cavity pumps, electric
submersible pumps)
Tar Sands
T S d and d Bitumen
Bit
12> API > 7 > 10 000 cP
non mobile at reservoir conditions
Master Ingegneria
g g del Petrolio 2006-2007
G R O U P
Description
p of traditional systems
y of artificial
lift
Piston pumps
Jet Pumps
Rod Pumps
Progressive Cavity Pumps - PCP
Electric submersible pumps - ESP
Master Ingegneria
g g del Petrolio 2006-2007
G R O U P
The
The closed power fluid system (CPF) keeps the
power fluid separated from the produced fluid
Disadvantages
Di d t Advantages
Ad t
low capacity high pressure head
power fluid solid control good efficiency
essential depth up to 17.000 feet
(to avoid excessive wear) resists to high temperatures
(300 -500F)
Master Ingegneria
g g del Petrolio 2006-2007
G R O U P
H d
Hydraulic
li Jet
J t pumps
Advantages
no moving gpparts ((low wear))
suitable for low quality production fluids
suitable for gassy wells
resists to high temperatures
Disadvantages
g suction p
high pressure ((to avoid cavitation))
high input horse power due to low efficiency (up to 30%)
possible emulsion former
Master Ingegneria
g g del Petrolio 2006-2007
G R O U P
Rod Pumps
Tubing
The p pumping
p g capacity
p y of these devices depends
p on
stroke length, pumping speed, volumetric efficiency Connection
w/tubing
(i.e. the percentage of pumps volume effectively
filled by new fluid)
fluid).
Plunger
Advantages
economic
resists to high temperatures
efficiency range from 50% to 60%
Traveling
valve
Disadvantages
g Barrel
unsuitable for deviated wells
seal wear Cage
Standing
g
low depth (10,000 ft) valve
Advantages
high efficiency (50%-70%)
(50% 70%)
suited for high viscous and/or abrasive fluids
reduced emulsion for no pulsating motion
works at high temperatures up to (300 F)
Disadvantages
low capacity (max speed 500 rpm)
suitable mostly for shallow wells (5000 ft) if rod driven
low ability to handle free gas (low efficiency)
Master Ingegneria
g g del Petrolio 2006-2007
G R O U P
Advantages Disadvantages
high capacity depth limitations due to input
horsepower limitation
good efficiency for high rates
50% for BFPD>1000 sensitivityy to high
g
temperatures
good head
gas locking problems
less than volumetric pumps
Master Ingegneria
g g del Petrolio 2006-2007
G R O U P
Master Ingegneria
g g del Petrolio 2006-2007
G R O U P
Summary
9Description of traditional systems of artificial lift ( piston type
pumps, jet pumps, rod pumps, progressive cavity pumps, electric
submersible pumps)
Affinity
Affi it laws
l for
f rotational
t ti l speed
d correction
ti
(applicable to inviscid fluids)
H vis Q vis
BHPvis =
vis 3960
Master Ingegneria
g g del Petrolio 2006-2007
G R O U P
Turzo et al (2000)
Turzo proposed the use of correlations
instead of Hydraulic institute charts:
Cq = 3
1 4.032710 q 1.72410 q
*
( ) 4 * 2
C = 1 3.307510 q + 2.887510 (q )
2 * 4 * 2
Stepanoff (1957)
Stepanoffs
S ff experiments
i showed
h d that
h at constant rotational
i l speed
d N the
h
specific speed Ns (defined at the best efficiency point) remains constant
either pumping viscous oil or water :
3/ 2
N q 1/ 2
N q 1/ 2
q oil H oil
Ns =
oil bep
=
wbep
= = ( )1.5
q w H w
Cq C H
3/ 4
H oil bep H w3bep
/4
Master Ingegneria
g g del Petrolio 2006-2007
G R O U P
N qbep
oil
Rstepanoff =
w
H bep oil
Summary
9Description of traditional systems of artificial lift ( piston type
pumps, jet pumps, rod pumps, progressive cavity pumps, electric
submersible pumps)
Comparison between
water design and oil design of an ESP for a viscous oil
((8 Api,
p 336 cp p at T = 100C)) :
Pumpss characteristics
Pump
Water
Water design
design Oil design
Oil design
Size : 5,13 Size : 5.13
Efficiency at the required point : 73% Efficiency at the required point : 15.9%
N b off stages
Number t : 31 Number of stages : 87
BHP required : 26.1 BHP required : 119.8
Frequency : 50 Hz q
Frequency y : 50 Hz
Master Ingegneria
g g del Petrolio 2006-2007
G R O U P
1400
1200
Water
1000
Required
q p
point
800
H (feet)
600
400
200
0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
Q (RB/day)
(RB/d )
Master Ingegneria
g g del Petrolio 2006-2007
G R O U P
2000
1500
1000
500
0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
Q (RB/day)
(RB/d )
Master Ingegneria
g g del Petrolio 2006-2007
G R O U P
EDVOCIA
500
0
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
Q (RB/day)
Master Ingegneria
g g del Petrolio 2006-2007
G R O U P
ESP ESPCP
Conclusions
9 Both ESPs and PCPs are suitable to handle high
viscous oils
9 PCPs are q
quite insensitive to oil viscosity
y showing
g
no reduction in head, capacity.