0 Voti positivi0 Voti negativi

80 visualizzazioni173 pagineMar 24, 2017

© © All Rights Reserved

PDF, TXT o leggi online da Scribd

© All Rights Reserved

80 visualizzazioni

© All Rights Reserved

- Midnight in Chernobyl: The Untold Story of the World's Greatest Nuclear Disaster
- The Hormone Reset Diet: The 21-day Diet That Resets Your Metabolism
- Bloody Sunday: A Thriller
- WomanCode: Perfect Your Cycle, Amplify Your Fertility, Supercharge Your Sex Drive, and Become a Power Source
- The Final Day: A John Matherson Novel
- Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich
- Vermilion Drift: A Novel
- King, Warrior, Magician, Lover: Rediscovering the Archetypes of the Mature Masculine
- HBR's 10 Must Reads on Managing Yourself (with bonus article "How Will You Measure Your Life?" by Clayton M. Christensen)
- Amity and Prosperity: One Family and the Fracturing of America
- The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind: Creating Currents of Electricity and Hope
- Chernobyl 01:23:40: The Incredible True Story of the World's Worst Nuclear Disaster
- Midnight in Chernobyl: The Story of the World's Greatest Nuclear Disaster
- Free to Focus: A Total Productivity System to Achieve More by Doing Less
- Atomic Accidents: A History of Nuclear Meltdowns and Disasters: From the Ozark Mountains to Fukushima
- The Making of the Atomic Bomb
- The Power of Full Engagement: Managing Energy, Not Time, is the Key to High Performance and Personal Renewal
- The Subtle Body: An Encyclopedia of Your Energetic Anatomy
- Lost in the Solar System
- The Energy Bus: 10 Rules to Fuel Your Life, Work, and Team With Positive Energy

Sei sulla pagina 1di 173

COMPRESSOR PERFORMANCE

RELEASE 1.0

November 2009

Southwest Research Institute

This page is intentionally left blank.

GUIDELINE FOR FIELD TESTING OF RECIPROCATING

COMPRESSOR PERFORMANCE

RELEASE 1.0

Authors:

Klaus Brun, Ph.D., SwRI

Rainer Kurz, Solar Turbines Principal

Bob Webber, Dynalco

William Elston, Compressor Systems, Inc.

Martin Hinchliff, Dresser-Rand

Everette Johnson, Cameron

Warren Laible, Windrock

Greg Lortie, Ariel Corporation

Randall Raymer, El Paso Corporation

Norm Shade, ACI Services, Inc.

This document contains information resulting from a cooperative study effort and is intended to be of beneficial use to

those interested. However, the contents hereof are only guidelines for the subject matter to which the document

pertains. Neither Southwest Research Institute Southern Gas Association, nor the Gas Machinery Research Council

make any warranty or representation, express or implied, (1) with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the

information contained in this document, or (2) that the use of any method, suggestion, technology, information, or

guidelines disclosed herein may not infringe on rights owned or claimed by others and further disclaim any liability for

the use of any methods, suggestions, technology, guidelines or other information disclosed herein.

This page is intentionally left blank.

Guideline for Field Testing Reciprocating Compressor Performance

RELEASE 1.0

Foreword

Field testing of reciprocating compressors has become increasingly common due to the need to verify

efficiency, power, and capacity of the compressor package upon delivery. The performance test of the

reciprocating compressor in the field is often necessary to assure that the manufacturer meets

performance predictions and guarantees a customers return on investment. Economic considerations

demand that the performance and efficiency of a reciprocating compressor package be verified at the

actual field site. Since the field environment is not ideal, an assessment of measurement uncertainties is

necessary to characterize the validity of a performance test. As the working field environments shift

further from the ideal case, the uncertainties increase. Previous field tests have shown that the

compressor efficiency uncertainty can be unacceptably high when some basic rules for proper test

procedures and standards are violated.

This guideline applies to a typical reciprocating compressor or compressor package. The motivation for

conducting a field test is based on at least one of the following objectives:

The manufacturer is required to supply the customer with the expected performance of the

reciprocating compressor. To the manufacturer, the field test provides a baseline for the

compressor at the site of delivery to compare to expected performance, which is based on

predicted performance. In addition, the field performance test is the final verification of

the guaranteed performance.

The user needs to verify performance of the reciprocating compressor. Baseline

performance data is obtained from the initial field performance test. The baseline test can

be used for comparing and monitoring the health of compressor package in the future.

The user or manufacturer needs to assess performance of the reciprocating compressor or

compressor package because of degradation concerns. Based on the field test results, a

performance recovery program may be initiated.

The user requires calibration of an installed historical trend monitoring system. The field

test is used to provide initial calibration of the system based on the first performance of the

reciprocating compressor or compressor package.

The user needs to compare the performance of different units at the station or compare the

performance of different stations to guide sequential dispatch of the best performing

units/stations which are available first.

Incorrect pressures may have been used during compressor selection process if pulsation

design was not considered. If a field performance test was not originally required during

installation, the user needs to conduct a test to determine the compressors operation at the

actual conditions experienced at the installation sight.

The user needs to measure the degradation (or improvement) of the system due to pulsation

attenuation devices installed based on the pulsation analysis and subsequent as-built

fabrication of the system.

The following guideline is a suggested best practice for field testing of reciprocating compressors.

Specific considerations at a field site may require deviation from this guideline in order to meet safety

requirements, improve testing efficiency, or comply with station operating philosophy.

This page is intentionally left blank.

Guideline for Field Testing of Reciprocating Compressor Performance

RELEASE 1.0

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2. PACKAGE AND COMPRESSOR PERFORMANCE ..........................................................1

3. PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS ......................................................................................2

3.1 Reciprocating Compressor Flow/Capacity .................................................................2

3.2 Compressor Efficiency ...............................................................................................3

3.3 Indicated Cylinder Horsepower (ICHP) and Brake Horsepower (BHP).......................6

3.4 Differential Indicated Power (DIP) ..............................................................................7

3.5 Suction and Discharge Volumetric Efficiency .............................................................7

3.6 Driver Power and System Efficiency ..........................................................................8

3.7 Equations of State .....................................................................................................9

4. DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURES ..............................................................................11

4.1 PV Card Method ......................................................................................................11

4.2 Enthalpy Rise Method ..............................................................................................20

4.3 PV Card and Enthalpy Rise Method ........................................................................24

5. TEST PREPARATION......................................................................................................24

5.1 Pre-Test Meeting .....................................................................................................25

5.2 Pre-Test Operation and Instrumentation Checkout ..................................................25

5.3 Pre-Test Equipment Checkout .................................................................................27

5.4 Pre-Test Information ................................................................................................27

5.5 Test Stability ............................................................................................................29

5.6 Safety Considerations..............................................................................................31

6. MEASUREMENT AND INSTRUMENTATION ..................................................................31

6.1 Measurement of Pressure........................................................................................32

6.2 Measurement of Temperature .................................................................................36

6.3 Measurement of Flow ..............................................................................................38

6.4 Measurement of Gas Composition...........................................................................40

6.5 Measurement of Crank Position ...............................................................................42

7. TEST UNCERTAINTY ......................................................................................................47

7.1 Ideal Field Test Conditions for Reducing Uncertainties ............................................ 49

7.2 Effects of Non-Ideal Installations on Uncertainty ......................................................52

8. INTERPRETATION OF TEST DATA ................................................................................55

8.1 Data Reduction and Checking Uncertainties ............................................................55

8.2 Use and Comparison of Data ...................................................................................55

8.3 Using Redundancy to Check Test Measurement and Uncertainty ........................... 57

8.4 Analysis of Measured Results ..................................................................................57

9. REFERENCES .................................................................................................................59

APPENDICES

APPENDIX B Calculation of Theoretical PV Diagram.............................................................68

APPENDIX C Equation of State Models .................................................................................77

APPENDIX D Equation of State Model Comparison of Predicted Performance Data ............. 85

APPENDIX E Uncertainty Analysis for Independent Variable Measurements......................... 91

APPENDIX F Compressor Performance Diagnostics with PV Diagrams .............................. 105

APPENDIX G Polytropic Efficiency ......................................................................................112

APPENDIX H Heat Loss Estimations ...................................................................................116

APPENDIX I Example PV Card Calculations........................................................................ 128

APPENDIX J Data Sheets for Reciprocating Compressor Performance Testing .................. 145

LIST OF FIGURES

(Edmister and Lee, 1984).....................................................................................5

Figure 3-2. Typical PV Diagram .............................................................................................6

Figure 3-3. PV Diagram with Pressure Also Measured in Nozzles .........................................7

Figure 4-1. Typical PV Diagram ...........................................................................................12

Figure 4-2. Location of Test Instrumentation for PV Card Method ........................................ 13

Figure 4-3. Pressure Transducer Installed on Compressor Cylinder with Indicator Valve ..... 14

Figure 4-4. PV Diagram with Channel Resonance Present Uncorrected High-Speed

Compressor (950 RPM) .....................................................................................15

Figure 4-5. PV Diagram with Channel Resonance Present Corrected High-Speed

Compressor (950 RPM) .....................................................................................15

Figure 4-6. PV Diagram with Channel Resonance Present Uncorrected Low-Speed

Compressor (330 RPM) .....................................................................................16

Figure 4-7. PV Diagram with Channel Resonance Present Corrected Low-Speed

Compressor (330 RPM) .....................................................................................16

Figure 4-8. PV Diagram with Varying ODC Measurements ..................................................18

Figure 4-9. Location of Test Instrumentation for Enthalpy Rise Method ............................... 21

Figure 5-1. Example of Drift and Fluctuations in a Temperature Measurement .................... 31

Figure 6-1. ASME PTC 10 Recommended Installation Configuration for Pressure and

Temperature Measurement ................................................................................34

Figure 6-2. Sampling Method with Pigtail as Recommended in API MPMS Chapter

14.1....................................................................................................................41

Figure 6-3. Encoder Installed on a Slow-Speed Reciprocating Compressor on Flywheel ..... 43

Figure 6-4. Encoder and Adapter Installed on a High-Speed Reciprocating Compressor ..... 43

Figure 6-5. Rotation of PV diagram to Correctly Reference ODC ......................................... 44

Figure 6-6. Example of Set-up for Dial Indicator Method ......................................................45

Figure 6-7. Hard Stop Placed Between Cylinder Head and Piston Through Valve

Pocket................................................................................................................46

Figure 6-8. Placement of ODC Mark Between Two Initial Marks .......................................... 46

Figure 7-1. Comparison of Tests with Different Levels of Uncertainty .................................. 50

Figure 7-2. Actual and Theoretical PV Diagrams for Performance Test at 450 RPM ............ 51

Figure 8-1. Example of Compressor Performance Curves for High-Speed Transmission

Compressor .......................................................................................................56

Figure 8-2. Comparison of Theoretical Predicted Performance and Measured

Performance Test Point .....................................................................................57

Figure 8-3. Example of Test Uncertainty Range ...................................................................58

Figure B-1. Theoretical PV Diagram with Start of Expansion Stroke Indicated ..................... 71

Figure B-2. Theoretical PV Diagram with Start of Compression Stroke Indicated ................. 71

Figure B-3. Theoretical PV Diagram with Multiple Points Plotted on Expansion Line ............ 72

Figure B-4. Theoretical PV Diagram with Multiple Points on Compression Line ................... 73

Figure B-5. Complete Theoretical PV Diagram ..................................................................... 73

Figure E-2. Determination of Uncertainty Using Perturbation Methods ................................. 95

Figure E-3. Example of Change in Theoretical PV Diagram with Pressure Uncertainty ...... 101

Figure F-1. Diagram Illustrating the Effects of Suction Valve Leaks ................................... 107

Figure F-2. Diagram Illustrating the Effects of Discharge Valve Leaks ............................... 108

Figure F-3. Diagram Illustrating the Effects of Piston Ring Leaks ....................................... 109

Figure H-2. Radiation Heat Transfer Coefficient with Emissivity and Mean Temperature.... 120

Figure H-3. Natural Convection Heat Transfer Coefficient with X and Mean

Temperature .................................................................................................... 121

Figure H-4. Forced Convection Heat Transfer Coefficient with Y and Mean

Temperature .................................................................................................... 122

Figure H-5. Natural Convection Heat Transfer Coefficient for Vertical Pipes with T and

Length.............................................................................................................. 124

Figure H-6. Natural Convection Heat Transfer Coefficient for Horizontal Pipes with T

and Diameter ................................................................................................... 124

Figure H-7. Forced Convection Heat Transfer Coefficient with Z and Mean Temperature .. 126

Figure I-2. PV Diagram with Channel Resonance Removed through Filtering ................... 132

Figure I-3. Graphical Representation of Integration of PV Diagram ................................... 133

Figure I-4. Where Suction and Discharge Valves Open on PV Diagram ........................... 134

Figure I-5. Theoretical PV Diagram with Correct PV Diagram ........................................... 135

Figure I-6. Variation in PV Diagram with Piston Position Uncertainty ................................ 138

LIST OF TABLES

Table 5-1. Maximum Deviations from Specified Values and Fluctuations from Average

Readings ........................................................................................................... 28

Table 5-2. Additional Assessment of Stability of Compressor During Pre-Test ................... 30

Table 5-3. Assessment of Stability of Compressor Driver During Pre-Test.......................... 30

Table 6-1. Typical Uncertainties in Pressure Measurement (shown as percent of full

scale) ................................................................................................................. 36

Table 6-2. Recommended Depth of Thermowells ............................................................... 37

Table 6-3. Typical Uncertainties in Temperature Measurement (shown as percent of

full scale) ........................................................................................................... 38

Table 6-4. Achievable Uncertainties in Flow Measurement with No Pulsating Flow ............ 40

Table 7-1. In-Practice Achievable Uncertainty for Measured Test Parameters .................... 49

Table 7-2. Compressor Geometry ....................................................................................... 50

Table 7-3. Summarization of Uncertainty for Performance Test at 450 RPM ...................... 51

Table 7-4. Example of Total Uncertainty Calculation for Compressor in "Near Ideal"

Case .................................................................................................................. 52

Table 7-5. Non-Ideal Installation Effects on Compressor Uncertainty.................................. 53

Table 7-6. Effects of Non-Ideal Encoder and Cylinder Pressure Measurements ................. 54

Table D-2. Assumed Measured Conditions; PR = 1.3.......................................................... 87

Table D-3. Assumed Measured Conditions; PR = 2.2.......................................................... 88

Table D-4. Horsepower and Efficiency Calculations for EOS Models at Pressure Ratio

of 1.3.................................................................................................................. 89

Table D-5. Horsepower and Efficiency Calculations for EOS Models at Pressure Ratio

of 2.2.................................................................................................................. 89

Table I-1. Calculation of Total Uncertainty of Measured ICHP for Cylinder End ............... 139

Table I-2. Defined and Calculated Values for Theoretical ICHP Uncertainty Due to

Pressure Uncertainty ....................................................................................... 140

Table I-3. Defined and Calculated Values for Theoretical ICHP Uncertainty Due to

Isentropic Constant Uncertainty ....................................................................... 141

Table I-4. Defined and Calculated Values for Theoretical ICHP Uncertainty Due to

Clearance Volume Uncertainty......................................................................... 141

Table I-5. Calculation of Total Uncertainty of Measured ICHP for Cylinder End ............... 142

This page is intentionally left blank.

DEFINITION OF SYMBOLS

cv = Specific heat at constant volume (Btu/lbm-R)

e = Voltage (volts)

f = Schultz factor for polytropic efficiency calculation or function elsewhere

h = Enthalpy of gas at suction, discharge or isentropic conditions (Btu/lbm)

i = Current (amps)

k = Isentropic exponent

l = Connecting Rod Length (in)

m = Mass (lbm)

n = Exponent or ending counting value

p = Total (stagnation) pressure of gas at suction or discharge side (psia)

q = Heat transferred (Btu/lbm)

r = Piston rod diameter (if not present r = 0) (inches)

s = Entropy at specified pressure and temperature (Btu/lbm-R)

x = Represents a parameter or calculated value

y = Mole fractions

B = Cylinder bore (inches)

BDC = Bottom Dead Center (see IDC definition)

BHP = Brake Horsepower of Compressor (HP)

BWR = Benedict-Webb-Rubin

BWRS = Benedict-Webb-Rubin-Starling

C* = Factor to convert capacity using defined units for other symbols, to MMSCFD (0.6397)

or SCFM (444.25)

CL% = Percent clearance of cylinder (%)

CQ* = Factor to convert capacity using defined units for other symbols, to MMSCFD

(0.2314 x 10-6) or SCFM (1.607 x 10-4)

DF = Degrees of Freedom

DIP = Differential Indicated Power (HP)

EOS = Equation of State

EVs = Suction volumetric efficiency (%)

EVd = Discharge volumetric efficiency (%)

F = Represents a calculated function, F

FFT = Fast Fourier Transform

H = Enthalpy rise for compressor, either actual or ideal (Btu/lbm)

ICHP = Actual Indicated Compressor Horsepower from measured PV Diagram (HP)

IDC = Inner Dead Center (see definitions)

K1 = Expansion line constant used for theoretical PV diagram generation

K2 = Compression line constant used for theoretical PV diagram generation

L = Loss factor

LHV = Fuel gas lower heating value, as determined through thermodynamic analysis (Btu/lbm)

LKP = Lee-Kesler-Plocker

MW = Molecular Weight

N = Unit Speed (RPM)

ODC = Outer Dead Center (see definitions)

P = Power (HP)

Pf = Power factor

PR = Peng-Robinson

PV = Pressure-Volume

Q = Capacity (MMSCFD or SCFM) or volumetric flow rate

R = Gas constant

RK = Redlich-Kwong

RTD = Resistance Temperature Detector

S = Stroke (inches)

SG = Specific gravity of gas (referenced to air)

SRK = Soave-Redlich-Kwong

T = Absolute temperature (R)

TDC = Top Dead Center (see ODC definition)

U = Flow velocity in pipe (ft/min)

V = Volume (in3)

W = Work performed by compressor end (area of PV diagram) (in-lbs)

Z = Gas compressibility

= Damping Ratio

= Efficiency (%)

= Position of shaft as reported by encoder (degrees)

v = Specific volume of gas at suction, discharge or isentropic conditions (ft3/lbm)

= Density (lbm/ft3)

= Resonance frequency

Subscripts:

a = Actual

comp = Full compressor

components = Components

cool = Cooling

cyl = Individual cylinder end

cl = Clearance

d = Discharge

e = Engine

fuel = Fuel

gas = Gas

ho = Heat removed through cooling jackets, conduction, and convection

i = Placeholder for later assigned number

in = Input condition

isen = Isentropic

m = Mechanical

min = Minimum

max = Maximum

mo = Motor

mol% = Fractional mol % for gas composition

p = Polytropic

s = Suction

stat = Static

stroke = Stroke

sys = System

swept = Swept volume

th = Thermal

universal = Universal gas constant

P = Polytropic condition

STD = Standard conditions (14.7 psia and 60 F)

= Rate (ex. m is mass flow rate)

1,2, = Numbers used to represent individual cylinders or cylinder ends

= Function of theta or rotational position

This page is intentionally left blank.

DEFINITIONS

2. Absolute Temperature: The temperature above absolute zero stated in degrees Rankine or

Kelvin. Rankine temperature is the Fahrenheit temperature plus 459.67 degrees; Kelvin is the

Celsius temperature plus 273.15 degrees.

3. Brake Horsepower (BHP): Brake horsepower refers to the power required of the driver to

supply power to the compressor, or compressor cylinder, and must include compressor

mechanical (bearings and seals) and compression losses. In the evaluation of a compressor

package, the BHP will need to also consider other parasitic loads, such as cooling fans driven

off the front end of the engine.

4. Brake Specific Fuel Consumption: Brake Specific Fuel Consumption is the fuel flow rate in

standard cubic feet per hour multiplied by the net dry heating value (LHV) of the fuel at

standard conditions in British thermal units per cubic foot divided by the total brake horsepower

measured at the engine flywheel. This term is applicable to engine driven packages and integral

compressors.

5. Brake Thermal Efficiency: Brake Thermal Efficiency is the overall efficiency of an engine. It

is the BHP or useful work delivered by the engine divided by the power input of the fuel.

6. Capacity: The rate of flow, determined by the mass flow divided by density of the gas under

standard conditions (SCFM or MMSCFD).

7. Clearance: Clearance refers to the actual volume in cubic inches trapped in the cylinder when

the piston is at outer dead center (including pocket and valve dead volumes).

8. Compression and Expansion Effective Exponents: These are the isentropic exponents for

compression and expansion of the gas. These can be determined from the expansion and

compression lines on the PV diagram.

9. Crank End: The crank end of the compressor cylinder is the end which is closest to the crank

shaft.

10. Cylinder Displaced Volume: Cylinder displaced volume refers to the total volume displaced

by the piston, including the total cylinder end clearance volume.

11. Density: The mass of gas per unit volume, equal to the reciprocal of the specific volume. The

density is a thermodynamic property determined from the total pressure and temperature at a

point in the fluid.

12. DIP (Differential Indicated Power): DIP represents the difference between the indicated

power for some portion or zone of the PV diagram with one boundary of that zone being a

reference pressure line, which may be constant or varying.

13. Differential Pressure: The difference between any two pressures measured with respect to a

common reference (i.e., the difference between two gage pressures).

14. Discharge Volumetric Efficiency (EVd or VEd): This is defined as the ratio of the volume of

gas discharged from the cylinder (at discharge pressure and temperature) to the swept volume of

the cylinder end.

15. Electric Motor Efficiency: The electric motor efficiency is the ratio between the output or

delivered power to the measured electrical input power.

16. Engine Fuel Flow: The engine fuel flow is the mass flow rate of fuel to the engine for

operation.

17. Gage Pressure: The pressure measured directly with the existing barometric pressure as the

zero base reference.

18. Head End: The head end of the compressor cylinder is the end which is furthest from the

crankshaft.

19. Indicated Compressor Horsepower (ICHP): This is the total rate at which the piston faces of

all cylinder ends do work on the gas, based on measured cylinder pressure, expressed in HP.

20. Inner Dead Center (IDC): Inner dead center refers to the condition where the piston is closest

to the crankshaft (also referred to as bottom dead center (BDC)).

21. Isentropic Compression: A reversible, adiabatic compression process.

22. Isentropic Efficiency: This is the ratio of isentropic power (IP) to measured power (ICHP for

PV Cards or P for Enthalpy Rise). This efficiency assumes that all heat transfer is accounted for

in the actual or measured power. If all the heat transfer is not accounted for, then the efficiency

should be referred to as a modified isentropic efficiency.

23. Isentropic Power: This is the ideal power required to isentropically compress and deliver the

capacity from suction to discharge conditions.

24. Mean Cylinder Effective Exponent: This is the polytropic exponent for expansion and

compression in the cylinder.

25. Mechanical Efficiency: This is the ratio of the total measured compressor power (ICHP or P)

to total shaft horsepower (BHP). This is often assumed to be in the range of 92-97% for low-

speed and high-speed compressors.

26. Mechanical Losses: The total power consumed by frictional losses in integral gearing,

bearings, seals, packing, rider bands, and piston rings.

27. Outer Dead Center (ODC): Outer Dead Center refers to the condition where the piston is at

point of travel furthest from the crankshaft (also referred to as top dead center (TDC)).

28. Polytropic Compression: A reversible compression process between the total suction pressure

and temperature and the total discharge pressure and temperature. The polytropic compression

process follows a path such that the polytropic exponent, nP, is constant during the process.

29. Pressure Ratio: The ratio of absolute total discharge pressure to absolute total suction pressure.

30. Shaft Power: The power delivered to the compressor shaft by the driver, also known as brake

power. Shaft power is equal to gas power plus mechanical losses.

31. Stage: A single, or number of parallel piston-cylinders and associated stationary flow passages.

32. Standard Volume Flow: The flow rate expressed in volume flow units at either of the standard

conditions outlined:

a. SI flow units are typically

i. Normal cubic meters per hour (Nm3/h) or Normal cubic meters per minute

(Nm3/min)

ii. At ISO standard conditions of: Absolute Pressure: 1.013 bar, Temperature 0 deg

C

b. US customary flow units are typically

i. Standard cubic feet per minute (SCFM), or Million standard cubic feet per day

(MMSCFD)

ii. At customary standard conditions of: Absolute pressure: 14.7 psia, Temperature:

60 deg F

33. Static Pressure: The pressure measured in such a manner that no effect is produced by the

velocity of the flowing fluid.

34. Static Temperature: The temperature determined in such a way that no effect is produced by

the velocity of the flowing fluid.

35. Suction Volumetric Efficiency (EVs or VEs): This is defined as the ratio of the volume of gas

drawn into the cylinder (at suction pressure and temperature) to the swept volume of the

cylinder end.

36. Swept Volume: Swept volume refers to the total volume displaced by the piston not including

the total cylinder end clearance volume.

37. Total (Stagnation) Pressure: An absolute or gage pressure that would exist when a moving

fluid is brought to rest, and its kinetic energy is converted to an enthalpy rise by an isentropic

process from the flow condition to the stagnation condition. In a stationary body of fluid, the

static and total pressures are equal.

38. Total (Stagnation) Temperature: The temperature that would exist when a moving fluid is

brought to rest and its kinetic energy is converted to an enthalpy rise by an isentropic process

from the flow condition to the stagnation condition. In a stationary body of fluid, the static and

total temperatures are equal.

39. Valve Losses: Valve losses refer to the pressure losses across the suction and discharge valves.

These are due to valve geometry flow losses. The flow through the valve is affected by

pulsations.

This page is intentionally left blank.

Guideline for Field Testing of Reciprocating Compressor Performance

The following guideline is intended to serve as a reference for field testing of reciprocating compressor

performance. This guideline applies to any party conducting a field test of a reciprocating compressor or

compressor package (manufacturer, user company, or third-party). It is intended to provide a technically

sound, yet practical procedure for all aspects of conducting field performance tests of reciprocating

compressors.

Specific requirements of a particular test may dictate that the test procedure deviates from this guideline

or the ideal installation described. However, when a particular test deviates from the installation

requirements or other test procedures, the deviation will affect the uncertainty of the test and should be

accounted for in the uncertainty analysis, as recommended in this guideline.

The development of this guideline was initiated by the ever growing presence of high-speed reciprocating

compressors in the industry. However, there are several low-speed reciprocating compressors operating

that also need performance tests. This guideline addresses items that should be considered for both high-

and low-speed compressors when conducting performance tests.

The standards that are used as references for this guideline are ASME PTC 10-1997, Performance Test

Code on Compressors and Exhausters, and API 618, Reciprocating Compressors for Petroleum,

Chemical, and Gas Industry Service, and ISO 1217, Displacement Compressors Acceptance Tests.

The performance testing of a reciprocating compressor can be completed in various fashions. This is

dependent upon the intent of the testing. There are two main methodologies that are used for testing: the

Enthalpy Rise method and the Pressure-Volume (PV) Card method (these methods are discussed in detail

in later sections of this guideline). These two methodologies can be used individually or in combination

with one another. Again, this is dependent upon the objectives of the performance test.

There is much debate as to whether the compressor performance can adequately be assessed by looking at

the compressor individually, flange-to-flange, or the compressor package as a whole, lateral-to-lateral.

All of these tests have their benefits depending upon the objective of the testing. If the user intends to

conduct a performance test with the intent of verifying the manufacturers ratings, then the compressor

would need to be tested individually. The compressor performance encompasses the machinery located

between the suction and discharge nozzle of each compressor cylinder. It would not necessarily include

the effects of pulsation bottles and piping and other equipment outside the nozzles. These could be

included, if these effects are deemed important in the performance test.

A combination of the Enthalpy Rise and PV Card methods can provide more information. If testing to

verify the manufacturers ratings is desired, then the tests should be conducted using a methodology as

close to that used during the manufacturers performance tests as possible, if practical.

Compressor package performance is used when the performance test mandates that the losses associated

with piping, bottles, and other auxiliary equipment be included in the assessment. This approach may be

used to validate the package design or to develop performance maps relative to the process parameters

that are being monitored for capacity/load control or reporting purposes. For example, if routine load

control is based on suction pressure observed at the inlet of the suction scrubber, the compressor

performance test should allow for performance to be correlated to this measurement point regardless of

cylinder flange measurements.

It also can include the performance of compressor drivers. The package performance requires more

measurements than the ones detailed below for the PV Card and Enthalpy Rise method. It may also

require a fuel flow rate measurement for engine driven compressors or electrical usage measurement for

electric motor driven compressors. The package performance is lacking in the sense that the losses may

not be directly identified. This is one way a combination of the PV Card and Enthalpy Rise method is

useful. Losses can easily be placed on the suction or discharge of particular cylinders using the PV Card

method and overall performance can be found with the Enthalpy Rise method. The losses are a

combination of valve losses, gas passage losses, and pulsations. Further testing would be needed to

identify losses associated with equipment external to the compressor. All side streams or exchanges of

mass need to be considered in the package performance test.

This guideline focuses on the details for compressor performance tests. It covers the Enthalpy Rise

method and PV Card method. It does not cover all the aspects of package performance testing, such as

acoustical and mechanical responses and parasitic loads on the compressor or engine, but the information

presented here is useful and can be used in completing a compressor package performance test.

3. PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS

The following six performance parameters generally describe the performance of a reciprocating

compressor. These parameters are commonly used in acceptance testing, testing to determine degradation

of the machine, and operational range testing. The primary measurements required in order to calculate

these parameters are discussed in Section 6. The uncertainty calculations are discussed in Section 7.

Accounting for the effect of non-ideal installations on uncertainty is also discussed in Section 7.

Performance Parameters:

1. Capacity

2. Compressor Efficiency

3. Indicated Cylinder Horsepower and Brake Horsepower

4. Differential Indicated Power

5. Suction and Discharge Volumetric Efficiency

6. Driver Power and System Efficiency

Capacity of a compressor cylinder is the gas flow rate in standard cubic feet per minute (SCFM) or in

million standard cubic feet per day (MMSCFD) at standard conditions of 14.696 psia pressure and

519.67 R temperature.

There are many ways to determine this value. It can be measured directly with a flow meter or calculated

given other measured parameters. Due to significant effects of pulsations on flow measurements, it is

necessary to check the flow measurement. This can be done by completing one of the calculations below

to compare the results. For adiabatic compression (no heat transfer, no valve losses, or leaks) of either

ideal or real gases, flow may be properly predicted by the methods given below. In reality, heat transfer,

valve losses, and finite valve and ring leaks are always present to some degree. Each of these effects

tends to reduce the actual capacity from that predicted by equations. Industry experience has shown that

on healthy cylinders, the capacity can be calculated within 2-3% of the actual value. For low ratio

compressors, such as pipeline compressors, the capacity can be calculated within 1% of the measured

value. The deviation will be greater on non-cooled or unhealthy cylinders.

This method can only be used when pressure and temperature measurements are taken at the suction and

discharge of the compressor and when the PV diagram is constructed from measurements on each

cylinder end. These measurements are used with the appropriate Equation of State (EOS) to calculate the

enthalpy values (hd and hs). The variable C* is a factor used to convert the capacity into MMSCFD or

SCFM. For MMSCFD use 0.6397 and for SCFM use 444.25. These factors apply when the units of the

variables in the equations are the same as defined in the nomenclature of this document. The variable

ICHP is the full compressor horsepower. This is the area of the PV diagram for the cylinder end being

tested.

C * * ICHP

Q=

(hd hs ) * SG (3-1)

Capacity for a cylinder end may also be calculated from cylinder parameters using the following

equations. The variable CQ* is used to convert the final capacity into MMSCFD or SCFM. The value for

MMSCFD is 0.2314x10-6 and for SCFM is 1.607x10-4. These factors apply when the units of the

variables in the equations are the same as defined in the nomenclature of this document. The volumetric

efficiencies, EVs and EVd, can be calculated using Equations 3-14 and 3-15. The piston rod diameter (r)

equals zero for capacity calculations for the head end of the compressor:

Q=

(CQ )* (B * 2

)

r 2 * S * N * EVs * p s * Z STD

(3-2)

Ts * Z s

Q=

(CQ ) * (B *

2

) EV * p s EVd * pd

r 2 * S * N * Z STD * s + (3-3)

2 Ts * Z s Td * Z d

These equations tend to overestimate the actual capacity because they do not account for gas preheating.

As the gas enters the cylinder, it gets hotter from heat transfer with the cylinder walls and from mixing

with residual gas in the cylinder bore.

Compressor efficiency is commonly defined based on either isentropic or polytropic ideal processes (see

Appendix G for polytropic efficiency). Both definitions are appropriate for performance comparison as

they provide a ratio of the ideal (isentropic or polytropic) enthalpy difference across the compressor to the

actual enthalpy difference (head). The isentropic process assumes a reversible adiabatic process without

losses (i.e., no change in entropy). This process is an ideal reference process.

The compressor actual enthalpy rise (H) and isentropic enthalpy rise (Hisen) are determined from the

measurement of pressure and temperature on the suction and discharge and the calculation of enthalpy

using an EOS model.

The enthalpy rises are calculated from the enthalpies associated with each state from the EOS as follows:

H = hd hs = h( pd , Td ) h( ps , Ts ) (3-5)

* Note that hd,isen is the enthalpy associated with the discharge pressure at the suction entropy, ss,

because the entropy change is zero in an isentropic process. All enthalpies should be directly

determined from the EOS.

Isentropic enthalpy difference can also be determined for estimation purposes (assuming ideal gas

behavior):

k 1

pd k

h = hd ,isen hs = c pTs 1 (3-6)

ps

The isentropic exponent, k, is defined as:

pd

ln

ps

k=

s (3-7)

ln

d ,isen

Isentropic Efficiency

Below are three equations to calculate isentropic efficiency. As mentioned above, the isentropic process

is adiabatic and reversible. In order to calculate a true isentropic efficiency, all heat losses in the system

should be accounted for. This is extremely difficult to do since many of these losses are due to friction.

If a reciprocating compressor has low or negligible overall heat losses (this would be true on a low

pressure ratio machine with no jacket cooling), then the efficiency calculated from Equations 3-8 through

3-10 can be considered to be an isentropic efficiency. However, if heat transfer is present, then the

efficiency can be considered a modified isentropic efficiency instead, since it does not represent a

purely isentropic process. Some examples of where heat transfer would be present are cylinders with

jacket cooling and when the surface temperature of the compressor is significantly different than the

ambient temperature (more than 20 degrees). The criterion discussed here applies for any mention of

isentropic efficiency throughout this guideline.

Equation 3-8 would be used with the Enthalpy Rise method where the enthalpy values will be calculated

from pressure and temperature on the suction and discharge of the compressor. The isentropic efficiency

is calculated from the isentropic and actual enthalpy rise. This can also be used to calculate the efficiency

of an individual cylinder with pressure and temperature measurements at the suction and discharge

nozzles. Equation 3-9 is used with the PV Card method. This equation is used to determine the

individual cylinder end efficiency. The indicated compressor horsepower (ICHP) is determined from the

measured PV diagram and the isentropic power (Pisen) is from the theoretical isentropic PV diagram.

Equation 3-10 is used with the PV Card method to calculate the efficiency of the full compressor. The

top of the equation is the summation of all calculated theoretical powers which are divided by the

summation of all measured powers.

hd ,isen hs

isen ,comp = (3-8)

hd hs

Pisen

isen ,cyl = (3-9)

ICHP

isen ,comp = (3-10)

ICHP1, HE + ICHP1,CE + ICHP2, HE + ...

The compression process for a typical reciprocating compressor and the associated enthalpy change are

shown on a P-h diagram in Figure 3-1 for 100% methane gas mixture. At the start of the compression

process the pressure and enthalpy are at ps and hs. An isentropic compression would follow the top

dashed line until it reaches pd and hd,isen. The actual compression process follows the bottom solid line

until it reaches pd and hd. The difference in enthalpy across these two lines gives the efficiency

(Equation 3-8).

pd, hd,isen

pd, hd

ps, hs

(Edmister and Lee, 1984)

3.3 Indicated Cylinder Horsepower (ICHP) and Brake Horsepower (BHP)

The Indicated Cylinder Horsepower term is characteristic of a performance test conducted using the PV

Card method. In that particular method, a pressure-volume curve is generated from the pressure and

volume changes within the compressor cylinder. The area within the PV curve represents the work

performed by the cylinder end and can be used to derive Indicated Cylinder Horsepower (ICHP), which is

directly related to the speed of the compressor. The equation below shows the calculation of ICHP from

the area of the PV diagram. The ICHP is, in turn, used with a theoretical horsepower to determine the

individual cylinder ends efficiency. Figure 3-2 shows a representation of an actual PV diagram. The

area enclosed within the compression and expansions lines, as well as the discharge and suction lines, is

the ICHP.

W *N

ICHP = (3-11)

396000

The BHP includes the effects of seals, bearings, rider bands, and piston rings. The BHP can be measured

with a torque meter on separable compressors, but usually the mechanical efficiency is assumed to be 92-

97% for both low- and high-speed compressors. Once the BHP for each individual cylinder end is

calculated, these values can be summed to obtain the compressor BHP. Equation 3-12 below shows the

calculation of cylinder end BHP with indicated compressor cylinder end horsepower and mechanical

efficiency. Equation 3-13 shows the calculation of the full compressor BHP by adding the individual

cylinder end values. More information on shaft power measurements with a torque meter can be found in

the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Performance Test Code (PTC) 19.7,

Measurement of Shaft Power.

ICHP

BHPcyl = (3-12)

m

3.4 Differential Indicated Power (DIP)

Differential Indicated Power (DIP) is a term used with the PV Card method. DIP represents the

difference between the indicated power for some portion or zone of the diagram with one boundary of

that zone being a reference pressure line, which may be constant or varying. Figure 3-2 illustrates the

Discharge Differential Indicated Power (DIPd) and Suction Differential Indicated Power (DIPs) relative to

assumed constant suction pressure (ps) and discharge pressure (pd), for this case, taken as the Inner Dead

Center (IDC) and Outer Dead Center (ODC) diagram pressure points. DIPd and DIPs, using the IDC and

ODC pressure values, reflect the effects of valve and internal passage flow losses and pulsation effects.

Nozzle or bottle pressures are often used as references for obtaining DIPd and DIPs values in an effort to

account for the influence of pulsations; however, this should be approached with caution since pressures

at these locations may not be representative of the dynamic pressure just outside the valves. Figure 3-3

shows an example of a PV diagram where the pressures inside the suction and discharge nozzles were

used to determine the DIP.

The effective suction volume is the amount of gas drawn into the cylinder during the expansion stroke.

The effective discharge volume is the amount of gas expelled during the compression stroke. These

values are characterized by the Volumetric Efficiency. Volumetric Efficiency (EV or VE) is defined as

the ratio of the volume of gas drawn into or expelled from the cylinder (at suction or discharge pressure

and temperature) to the swept volume of the piston. Theoretical or ideal EVs (suction) and EVd

(discharge) may be calculated using the equations below. The calculated EVs has an implicit assumption

that gas is induced at suction temperature. The temperature actually rises during the suction intake, due to

heat transfer from the cylinder and mixing of the suction gas with the residual gas remaining in the

clearance of the cylinder. The temperature effects, as well as effects due to piston rings, packing rings,

and valve leaks, are accounted for in the theoretical calculation with a loss factor (L). The losses can only

be determined empirically (measured in test). For transmission compressors or low pressure ratio

compressors, the losses usually range from 1-3%. At high pressure ratios, these losses are from 5-10%.

1

p

EVs = 100 - CL% * d - 1 L

k

(3-14)

p s

1

p k

100 - CL% * d 1

p s

EVd = L (3-15)

1

pd k

ps

The measured volumetric efficiency is defined by the valve opening events, toe pressure, or measured

nozzle pressure. The valve openings can be determined from the measured PV diagram. Valve openings

are assumed to occur when the cylinder pressure crosses the pressure just outside the valve (pressure in

the suction or discharge nozzles). The suction and discharge valve openings are labeled in Figure 3-3.

For example, if the suction valve opens at 25% volume (ODC is 0% volume) on the expansion stroke,

then the suction volumetric efficiency is 75%. Also, if the discharge valves open at 60% volume on the

compression stroke, then the discharge volumetric efficiency is 60%.

If the overall performance is being evaluated (including the driver and compressor), it is important to

determine the driver power during performance testing.

Engine

During performance testing of reciprocating compressors with gas engines, the flow rate of the fuel is

measured with a flow meter. Also, the gas composition of fuel is measured. From the gas composition,

the Low Heating Value (LHV) of the fuel can be calculated using EOS. The equations below are used to

calculate the input power from the fuel and the engine brake thermal efficiency. The BHP is determined

from the compressor ICHP using a calculated, measured, or assumed mechanical efficiency of the

compressor.

If the compressor is separable (usually high speeds), then the power can be measured with a torque meter

at the coupling. The power input to an integral engine (slow speed) would have to be determined with the

ICHP. More details on performance test of engines can be found in PTC 17, Reciprocating Internal

Combustion Engines.

Pin = m fuel * LHV (3-16)

BHP

e = (3-17)

Pin

ICHP

BHP = (3-18)

m

Electric Motor

If an electric motor is driving the compressor, then the applied voltage and phase currents must be

measured to determine the absorbed power. Typically an ammeter will measure the current draw of the

motor. If these values are measured, then the power can be determined from the first equation below for

each phase. The power factor should be measured at the conditions that the performance test will be

conducted. The power factor provided in the manufacturer literature was determined for a steady state

load. Electric motors driving reciprocating compressors will experience a pulsating load, which causes a

shift in the power factor. The total power is determined by summing the power of the phases. The motor

efficiency, mo, can be calculated using Equation 3-17 and substituting the input power to the engine with

input power to the motor. Methods of determining motor absorbed power can be found in a relevant

standard, such as IEEE 112, Test Procedure for Polyphase Induction Motors and Generators and IEEE

115, Test Procedures for Synchronous Machines.

System Efficiency

The system efficiency can be estimated from the ratio of the compressor gas power (power transmitted

from compressor to gas through compression) and the power input into the compressor driver, as shown

in the equation below. For the PV Card method, compressor power is calculated by adding the ICHP of

each cylinder end together. For the Enthalpy Rise method, if the power is measured across the

compressor, then the power is calculated with the mass flow rate of the gas and the enthalpy difference.

If each individual cylinder is tested, the power for each cylinder will be added together to obtain the total

power. The system efficiency will be lower than the compressor efficiency since it also takes into

account the engine efficiency.

Pcomp

sys = isen m e (3-20)

P in

In the field performance test of the compressor, the correct determination of the thermodynamic

properties of the gas (such as enthalpy, entropy, and density) plays a critical role. The measured

quantities (such as pressure, temperature, and composition) are used as inputs to an EOS to determine

thermodynamic properties. The enthalpy change is used to determine the head and the isentropic or

polytropic efficiency of a compressor. The choice of the EOS used in calculating enthalpy and density

affects the accuracy of the results and needs to be considered in the uncertainty calculation.

The possible equations of state commonly used in the gas industry are: Redlich-Kwong (RK), Soave-

Redlich-Kwong (SRK), Peng-Robinson (PR), Benedict-Webb-Rubin (BWR), Benedict-Webb-Rubin-

Starling (BWRS), Lee-Kesler-Plocker (LKP), and AGA-10. The final selection of the EOS to be used in

the field test should depend on the applicability of the particular EOS model to the gas and temperatures

encountered along with the process of interest. EOS model accuracy may depend upon the application

range and the gas mixture at the site (Sandberg, 2005; Kumar et al., 1999).

The consistent application of the EOS throughout the planning, testing, and analysis phases of the field

test is imperative. The choice of which EOS to use must be agreed upon before the test. It is

recommended to use the EOS for test data reduction that was also used for the performance prediction.

The selection of a particular EOS can have an important effect on the apparent efficiency and absorbed

gas power. An added uncertainty of 1 to 2% can be incurred on the performance results if the EOS is

inconsistently applied (Kumar et al., 1999). The formulation of the various EOS is given in Appendix C.

Generally, it is not possible to select a most accurate EOS to predict gas properties, since there is

generally no calibration norm to test against for typical hydrocarbon mixtures. All the frequently used

EOS models (RK, BWR, BWRS, LKP, SRK, and PR) can predict the properties of hydrocarbon mixtures

accurately below 20 MPa for common natural gas mixtures.

Outside this pressure range, deviations between the EOS models of 0.5 to 2.5% in compressibility factor

Z are common, especially if the natural gas contains significant amounts of diluents. Because derivatives

of the compressibility factor (Z) must be used to calculate the enthalpy rise, the enthalpy rise deviations

can be larger than the compressibility factor for different EOS. Table 3-1 provides usage suggestions for

the various EOS models based on application. For normal hydrocarbon gas mixtures (such as pipeline

quality gas) with diluent content (combined CO2 and N2) below 10%, all equations of state shown in

Table 3-1 provide accurate results. Beyond this range, Table 3-1 provides some general

recommendations on the most applicable EOS.

Typical hydrocarbon gas mixture, standard Redlich-Kwong (RK), Soave-Redlich-Kwong (SRK),

pressures and temperatures, low CO2 and Peng Robinson (PR), Benedict-Webb-Rubin-Starling

N2 diluents (< 6% total). Air mixtures. (BWRS), Benedict-Webb-Rubin (BWR), Lee-Kesler-

Plocker (LKP), AGA-10

BWRS, BWR, AGA-10, LKP

high hydrogen content gases.

Non-hydrocarbon mixtures: ethylenes, Specific EOS model designed for chemical mixture will

glycols, carbon dioxide mixtures, result in greater accuracy. The literature should be

refrigerants, hydrocarbon vapors, etc. consulted for the particular gas and application.

A further comparison of the various EOS models is provided in Appendix D. The calculated enthalpies

for various EOS models at different states are used to calculate isentropic efficiency and compressor

power for two compressor operating cases.

4. DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURES

In reciprocating compressor performance testing, the most common method used is the PV Card method.

This method utilizes a pressure measurement inside the cylinder along with a piston position

measurement to develop a pressure-volume curve for each cylinder end. From this, the compressor

cylinder ends indicated horsepower can be calculated. The isentropic efficiency can be calculated with

the measured horsepower and calculated theoretical or isentropic horsepower.

The second method is the Enthalpy Rise method. This is mostly used with centrifugal compressors but

can be useful with reciprocating compressors as well. This method takes temperature and pressure

measurements on the suction and discharge sides of the compressor. Using EOS relationships, the

enthalpy is calculated at each location. With a mass flow rate measurement, the total power can be

calculated with the measured enthalpy difference. This method can also be used to measure each

cylinders efficiency. The pressure and temperature measurements would be made at the suction and

discharge nozzles.

Both methods are beneficial, depending upon the objectives of the performance measurement. For

example, if the objective of the test is to obtain an overall estimate of the efficiency of the compressor

package, the Enthalpy Rise method would be beneficial. In this case, it would require the minimum

number of measurements (suction and discharge line pressure and temperature) to obtain the efficiency.

If the user wanted to complete a diagnostics type performance test, studying each individual cylinder, the

PV Card method would be more useful. These two methods can also be utilized in conjunction with one

another. Discussed below are the details that should be considered with each method.

The PV Card method is commonly used for reciprocating compressor performance testing. In general,

this method is used to assess the performance of individual cylinder ends. The results can then be used to

evaluate the performance of the compressor as a whole.

With the use of the PV Card method, it is essential to have a clear understanding of the PV diagram. This

section discusses the physical operation of the compressor in relation to the PV diagram. Figure 4-1

shows a typical PV diagram with labels indicating different important parameters. Some of these

parameters are discussed below.

Line 4-1: The suction valve opens at Point 4, as the piston travels toward IDC (for the crank, or frame

end of a compressor cylinder), the volume in the cylinder increases, and gas flows into the cylinder. The

pressure inside the cylinder is slightly less than the pressure outside the cylinder. This small differential

pressure holds the suction valve open. The suction valve closes as the piston reaches IDC and changes

direction at Point 1. The differential pressure across the suction valve decreases to zero as the piston

reaches IDC. The pressure force holding the valve open becomes less than the spring force of the valves

and the suction valve closes.

Line 1-2: The piston reverses directions and the volume inside the cylinder starts to decrease. As the

volume of the contained gas continues to decrease toward Point 2, the pressure increases. The shape of

the compression line (Line 1-2) is determined by the many different factors. In a measured PV diagram,

the shape is affected primarily by the clearance volume, the pressure ratio, and the gas composition. A

theoretical curve is determined with clearance volume, pressure ratio, and calculated constant

compression exponent. For an ideal gas and adiabatic process (no flow of heat to or from the gas being

operated on), the compression exponent is the isentropic (constant entropy) exponent, which is equal to

the ratio of specific heats of the gas being compressed.

Line 2-3: At Point 2, the pressure inside the cylinder has become slightly greater than the pressure

outside the cylinder. The resulting differential pressure across the discharge valve causes the valve to

open, allowing gas to flow out of the cylinder. The volume continues to decrease toward Point 3,

maintaining sufficient pressure differential across the discharge valve to hold it open. At Point 3, the

piston reaches ODC (for the crank, or frame end of a compressor cylinder) and reverses direction. The

differential pressure across the discharge valve decreases to zero as the piston reaches ODC. The

pressure force holding the valve open becomes less than the spring force of the valves and the discharge

valve closes.

Line 3-4: The gas trapped in the cylinder expands as the volume increases toward Point 4. At Point 4,

the gas pressure inside the cylinder becomes less than the pressure outside the cylinder, creating a

differential pressure which opens the suction valves. The cycle then starts over again. The shape of the

expansion line (Line 3-4) is dependent on the same factors as the compression line.

4.1.2 Measurements

The PV Card method requires the measurements listed below, and shown in Figure 4-2, to calculate the

compressor power and efficiency. Depending upon the requirements set for the performance test, not all

of the measurement locations shown in Figure 4-2 are required.

1. Cylinder pressure

2. Piston position (crank-shaft rotational position)

3. Suction and discharge temperatures

4. Gas composition

5. Barometric Pressure

6. Compressor geometry (ex. Bore diameter, clearance, etc.)

7. Engine fuel gas flow rate or electric motor power consumption (for overall system

efficiency)

8. Fuel gas composition (for overall system efficiency)

The cylinder pressure and piston position are used to form the pressure-volume curve. The area inside of

this curve, which is determined by numerical integration, gives the indicated power for the cylinder end.

The total brake horsepower consumed by the compressor can be estimated by summing the individual

cylinder end indicated horsepower and by applying an assumed mechanical efficiency from cylinder to

crankshaft. The suction and discharge temperature, gas composition, and toe pressures from the

measured PV diagram are utilized to calculate the theoretical isentropic power for the cylinders. This

theoretical power is then used to calculate the isentropic efficiency of each cylinder as well as the

compressor. Barometric pressure should be measured in order to correctly calculate absolute pressure

from measured gage pressure. Compressor geometry will be reported in manufacturer literature, but it is

possible that over the life of the compressor changes will have been made. Current changes in

compressor dimensions, such as bore diameter (especially on older compressors) and if additional

clearance has been added, should be documented and possibly measured. The engine fuel gas flow,

electric motor power consumption, and fuel gas composition are required, if the overall system efficiency

is being evaluated.

4.1.2.1 Cylinder Pressure

The cylinder pressure is a time varying cylinder end pressure that is a function of the pistons positions in

the cylinder. It is measured with a pressure transducer, which has a high enough frequency of response to

track the dynamic pressure in the cylinder without phase delay.

Optimal cylinder pressure measurement is accomplished with a pressure transducer mounted flush with

the inside of the cylinder wall, so that the transducer diaphragm will sense the pressure directly in the

cylinder chamber without the distorting effects cause by indicator passages. Typically, ports are drilled in

the side of the compressor cylinder for pressure transducers. These are referred to as indicator ports.

Pressure transducers that fit into larger indicator passageways are available. This would allow the

transducer to be flush-mounted to the cylinder bore. When the transducers are not flush-mounted, the

ports will usually have an indicator valve (example shown in Figure 4-3), such that the pressure

transducers can be installed without shutting down the compressor. Externally-mounted pressure

transducers are an effective method for moving transducers during testing, but this also can lead to

pressure variations at the transducer that are not representative of the pressure in the cylinder. These are

referred to as channel resonances and channel attenuations.

Figure 4-3. Pressure Transducer Installed on Compressor Cylinder with Indicator Valve

Channel Resonance

Installation of pressure transducers to monitor cylinder conditions on reciprocating compressors can give

rise to an acoustic resonance phenomenon known as Helmholtz or channel resonance. The channel

resonance is a function of the geometry of the indicator port and valve, and it occurs due to an excitation

of the quarter-wave acoustic length resonance of the gas passage between the cylinder interior and the

pressure transducer. This effect can superimpose a large amplitude, periodic pressure wave on the true

cylinder pressure and can result in a distorted pressure-volume diagram. This resonance will typically

show up on the expansion and compression lines, as well as when the suction or discharge valves are

open. In high-speed compressor cylinders, this may significantly add to the peak differential pressure

measured in the cylinder, which can affect the accuracy of rod load and pin reversal calculations. The

resonance or waves will not be as apparent on high-speed compressor expansion and compression lines as

on a low-speed compressor PV diagram. However, the resonance is still present, if the sensors are not

flush-mounted. Since the resonance is sinusoidal in nature, it can be removed without significantly

affecting the measured indicated horsepower. This is assuming that it can be deleted without causing a

phase shift in the original PV diagram. Figure 4-4 and Figure 4-5 show examples of PV diagrams taken

with the presence of channel resonance on a high-speed compressor. Figure 4-6 and Figure 4-7 show

channel resonance on a low-speed compressor.

Figure 4-4. PV Diagram with Channel Resonance Present Uncorrected High-Speed Compressor

(950 RPM)

Figure 4-5. PV Diagram with Channel Resonance Present Corrected High-Speed Compressor

(950 RPM)

Figure 4-6. PV Diagram with Channel Resonance Present Uncorrected Low-Speed Compressor

(330 RPM)

Figure 4-7. PV Diagram with Channel Resonance Present Corrected Low-Speed Compressor

(330 RPM)

There are several ways to mitigate the effects of channel resonance. One method is to flush-mount the

transducer in the cylinder. This is not always practical since it eliminates the use of a valve. Without the

valve, the transducer cannot be moved while the compressor is in operation, and it cannot be isolated to

check the transducer calibration. Pinching the transducer cutoff valve is not an acceptable method,

because it will introduce an unacceptable horsepower measurement error. During the selection and

purchase of the compressor, the user should consider the indicator port geometry. The port should be

made as short as possible, with a large diameter and a straight through ball valve for the indicator valve.

The volume of the gas in the indicator port to the transducer should be minimized. Following these

recommendations will ensure that the resonance frequency is as high as possible for the channel.

A practical method of eliminating the channel resonance after the measurement has been taken is through

mathematical filtering. Mathematical filtering techniques can be effective, if the channel resonance

frequency can be identified. Once the frequency is determined, then the application of a non-phase

shifting low pass filter is recommended. This will improve the accuracy of the suction and discharge toe

pressure picks and the identification of the suction and discharge volumetric efficiencies while not

detrimentally affecting the indicated horsepower measurement.

Another method for removing the resonance is with a linear acoustic transfer function developed under

GMRC funding. This transfer function was developed specifically for removing channel resonance on

low speed, low ratio compressors. The transfer function and phase is determined with Equations 4-1 and

4-2 below. The frequency and damping factors can be determined with an FFT (Fast Fourier Transform)

analysis or computing the log decrement. This transfer function is only applicable to low speed/low ratio

compressors. High-speed/high ratio compressors have a greater phase lag during the compressor process

due to high channel restrictions, which makes the linear transfer function inadequate. A non-linear

transfer function developed under GMRC research funding is proposed by Harris and Edmund in their

paper titled, Performance Measurements of High-Speed/High Ratio Reciprocating Compressors (1998).

n 2

i =3, 5, 7 ,... i

TRF = TRF + (4-1)

2 1/ 2

(

1

2

) 2

+ 2

i

n 2 i

( ) = ( ) + tan 1 i (4-2)

i =3, 5, 7 ,...

2

1

i

Experience has indicated that effective channel resonance elimination can be made with less than -1%

indicated change in the measured horsepower on a high-speed compressor cylinder and less than -0.5%

change in the measured horsepower on a low-speed compressor cylinder. The change in measured

horsepower refers to the difference between ICHP before and after the channel resonance has been

removed. Horsepower changes larger than this would indicate that more than channel resonance is being

eliminated or the method has introduced a phase shift into the raw data. Filtering is generally

incorporated into digital compressor performance analyzers.

Channel Attenuation

Channel attenuation develops in environments with rapid (real) changes in pressure. It is common with

high-speed compressors, heavy gases, and small diameter measurement channels. It is directly related to

the resistance of the channel to pressure changes. A high resistance or restrictive channel will prevent the

gas density from changing fast enough in the channel to match the real transient conditions. The resulting

pressure measurements will be distorted. Typically, this error is identified by distortions on the

compression and expansion lines on the PV diagram. The most effective method of avoiding this

phenomenon is to have large diameter indicator ports or to flush mount the transducers.

More information on calibration, installation, and use of pressure transducers is in Section 6.1.

4.1.2.2 Piston Position

The piston position is needed for calculation of the instantaneous cylinder volume. There are many

factors that can affect this measurement. Encoders attached to the crankshaft are typically used to make

this measurement. Encoders with higher resolution may provide less uncertainty. The use of an encoder

is based on ideal kinematic relationships to crankshaft rotation. The effects of crankshaft twisting and

deflection in the crankpin and crosshead bearings can cause deviations from this ideal relationship. In

some instances, a key phasor may be used to indicate the position of all pistons. This can have a very

high uncertainty due to variations in rotational speeds during each revolution. The pressure measurement

may not correlate with the volume measurement correctly with the use of a once per turn device, such as a

key phasor, optical, or magnetic pick-up. The best practice is to use an encoder with resolution of 360 or

greater. Because of this, the use of a once per turn device is not discussed in the power, efficiency, or

uncertainty calculations.

ODC Determination

In order to have the correct reference of pressure to piston position, the location of ODC must be found

and synchronized with the encoder. If the ODC determination is off, the horsepower will not be correct

and it will appear as if the valves are opening and closing at the wrong time. A 1-3 degree inaccuracy in

ODC determination can cause a 3-5% error in horsepower. Figure 4-8 shows the difference in a PV

diagram with different ODC errors. In this example, a 4.9 deg error leads to approximately an 8% error in

the horsepower. More information on the use of encoders and determination of ODC is in Section 6.5.

90

Original 8.73 HP

4.9 deg 8.04 HP (-7.9%)

70

Pressure (psig)

60

50

40

30

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

Volume (in^3)

The suction and discharge temperature and gas composition are needed for calculating the theoretical PV

diagram from the EOS. The temperature is usually measured outside the cylinder (in the nozzle). This

temperature will be different than the actual temperature inside the cylinder during suction and discharge

due to several factors: in most cases (some exceptions are Helium or Hydrogen) the pressure drop across

the valves causes a decrease in temperature, heat is transferred from the cylinder to the incoming gas, and

the suction gas mixes with the residual gas in the cylinder. The heat transfer is typically small for low

compression ratios, but can be significant for higher compression ratios and non-cooled cylinders. The

factor that has the most significant effect is the mixing of the suction gas with the residual gas. The

resulting suction temperature due to this effect can be calculated using simple thermodynamic

relationships. Temperature measurements in the nozzles will have high variations due to pulsating flow.

The measurement device should be installed in a thermowell to damp out the pulsation effects. More

information on temperature measurements can be found in Section 6.2.

4.1.2.4 Driver Fuel Gas Composition, Fuel Gas Flow Rate, and Motor Power

These measurements are required to determine the power developed by the gas engine or electric motor to

meet the compressor demand. The gas composition will be measured with a gas chromatograph to

determine the composition of the fuel gas. It will also serve to verify that the gas composition does not

change significantly during the performance tests. The gas composition will be used with EOS to

determine the fuel gas properties.

The fuel flow rate will be used to determine the amount of energy being supplied to the driver. This is

measured with a typical flow meter such as an orifice meter. With this value, the overall efficiency of the

driver/compressor system can be determined as shown in Section 3.6. This efficiency will include the

efficiency of the driver, compressor, and mechanical losses.

The motor power is found with a measured voltage and current. Typically, an ammeter will measure the

current draw of the motor. This, along with the power factor and efficiency of the motor, can be used to

calculate the power absorbed. As with the gas engine, the overall efficiency of the driver/compressor

system can be determined, as shown in Section 3.6.

Theoretical equations are presented in Section 3.1 for the calculation of capacity. Several considerations

should be taken when completing these calculations to ensure that the error is minimized.

Several of the parameters in the equations presented are found in manufacturer literature, directly

measured, or calculated from EOS with the measured values. The suction and discharge volumetric

efficiency is a variable that needs to be calculated from ideal equations or determined from the PV

diagram. The theoretical EV may be used for operation or control, so it is important that the theoretical

and measured EV are close. The theoretical EV may be different from the measured EV due to an

unhealthy cylinder, restrictive flow, variations in gas composition, etc. It is important that any

performance issues, such as leaks, be corrected before taking performance data. However, if the

difference between the theoretical and measured EV are due to permanent physical phenomena, such as

flow restrictions through valves or gas passages, then the losses can be accounted for with a loss factor in

the theoretical equations as shown in Equations 3-14 and 3-15.

As shown in Section 3.4, the percent clearance (%CL) is used within the calculations of both suction and

discharge volumetric efficiency. Percent clearance is a value usually reported in manufacturer literature.

The actual %CL may be different due to manufacturing tolerances or aftermarket capacity control device

installation. The manufacturers stated %CL will usually be within 2-3% of the actual value without

aftermarket devices. The %CL needs to be determined for each cylinder end either based on

manufacturer nameplate values and aftermarket devices or measured values.

Clearance pocket geometry may cause a variation between actual and effective clearance volume. For

example, if there is a small throat to the clearance pocket, the full pocket volume may not achieve

discharge pressure during the compression stroke. The variation in volumetric efficiency gives the

appearance of an effective clearance that varies from the measured or stated clearance. The effective

clearance can be determined from the PV diagram. Analyzers are available that determine the effective

clearance value. Incorrect clearance will lead to error in the volumetric efficiency, horsepower, and flow

calculations.

4.1.4 Uncertainty

Listed below are the potential sources of uncertainty in the PV Card method. The effect of these

individual uncertainties on the results of the performance measurements will be discussed in Sections 6

and 7.

Pulsations

AC or Electrical Noise

Sensor Accuracy

Sensor Calibration

Channel/Helmholtz Resonance and Attenuation for Pressure Transducers

Temperature Effects on Pressure Measurement

Valve Effects

ODC Determination

Unsteady Operation Conditions

Theoretical Calculations/EOS

The actual measurement of the PV diagram provides a curve from which the indicated compressor

horsepower can be calculated. In order to use this data to calculate an isentropic efficiency of the

compressor cylinder, the theoretical PV diagram must be generated. This is done using the results of the

measurements, compressor geometry, and EOS calculations. The process of calculating the PV diagram

is described in more detail in Appendix B. Once the theoretical PV diagram is generated, then the

isentropic efficiency of the compressor cylinder end can be calculated using the equations detailed in

Section 3.2. Commercial analyzers automatically develop the theoretical PV diagram and calculate the

isentropic ICHP.

The Enthalpy Rise method is based on a relationship of the energy contained in the gas at the suction and

discharge of the compressor. This method uses temperature and pressure measurements at the suction and

discharge to calculate the enthalpy. The enthalpy difference multiplied by mass flow rate gives the power

consumed by the compressor and can be used with theoretical calculations to obtain the isentropic

efficiency. This method is good at assessing the overall performance of the compressor. It can also be

used to determine the performance of individual cylinders.

4.2.1 Measurements

The Enthalpy Rise method requires the measurements listed below to calculate the power and efficiency

of the compressor and as shown in Figure 4-9.

1. Suction and discharge pressures

2. Suction and discharge temperatures

3. Gas flow rate

4. Gas composition

5. Driver fuel gas flow rate or electric motor power (for overall system efficiency)

6. Fuel gas composition (for overall system efficiency)

The suction and discharge pressures and temperatures are used with the Equations of State (EOS) to

calculate the enthalpies. The gas composition is required for the EOS calculations. The suction pressure

and temperature are used to calculate the entropy at the suction condition. This entropy with the

discharge pressure is used in the EOS to calculate the isentropic enthalpy at the discharge. The enthalpy

difference at the suction and discharge conditions is used to calculate power and efficiency. The flow rate

of the gas is used with the enthalpy difference to calculate total power. In the Enthalpy Rise method, the

driver fuel gas flow, electric motor power, and fuel gas composition for determination of overall

efficiency will have the same considerations as the PV Card method (refer to Section 4.1.2.4).

The suction and discharge temperatures are required to calculate the enthalpy from the EOS. This is

measured with either a thermocouple or RTD. There are several locations that can be used for measuring

the temperature. Consideration should be given to the fact that both the temperature and pressure should

be measured for this method. It may not be feasible to measure each of these in the same location due to

space constraints. The optimal temperature measurement location is on the nozzles near the cylinders as

shown in Figure 4-9. When determining an isentropic efficiency, it is important to place the pressure and

temperature measurements in locations that will best represent isentropic compression. Since an

isentropic process does not have any heat transfer (adiabatic), placing the sensors before or after vessels

where heat transfer could occur should be avoided. However, the desired measurement location is often

not accessible. The temperature measurements may end up being made outside of the suction and

discharge bottles. If this is the case, then the heat losses should be accounted for in the efficiency

calculation. A methodology is presented in Appendix H that can be used to determine heat transfer

effects. In order to avoid this extra computation, it is easiest to place the temperature sensors in the

nozzles.

The nozzle region has pulsations, which causes an unsteady temperature measurement. The temperature

sensor should be placed in a thermowell to damp out the effects of pulsations. If a thermowell is used,

adequate time needs to be allowed during the test for the thermowell to properly heat soak. More

information is presented in Section 6.2 on temperature measurements.

The heat losses due to water cooling of the compressor cylinder should be considered in the isentropic

efficiency calculation. The equations below show in general how these are accounted for in the

compressor power and isentropic efficiency where the component energy includes the bottles, nozzles,

and piping and the cooling energy includes cylinder cooling through a water jacket. Further information

is provided in Appendix H on methods to account for these losses.

(4-3)

hd ,isen hs

isen = (4-4)

hd hs + q components + q cool

The suction and discharge pressures are also required for the enthalpy calculation with the EOS. The

objective of the tests dictates where the transducer should be installed. If the goal is to analyze the

compressor package, then the transducers would need to be placed outside the bottles. If individual

cylinders are the subject of interest, then the pressure needs to be measured in the nozzles. The location

of measurement affects the type of pressure transducer that should be used. Before the first set of bottles,

the flow may be steady enough for the use of a static pressure transducer. If the pressure is measured on

the nozzles right before the cylinder, a dynamic pressure transducer would be needed due to the pulsating

flow.

With regards to instrument drift, dynamic pressure transducers have a higher inaccuracy over time

compared to static pressure transducers. However, by calibrating dynamic transducers just prior to the

performance test they can achieve sufficient accuracy during the test. If compressor cylinder (as opposed

to package) performance is being analyzed and the pressure measurements are taken either before or after

the bottles, then the pressure losses for each pulsation control chamber needs to be taken into account.

If pressure measurements are taken in the nozzles, or in an area of high pulsating flow, then the resulting

pressures need to be time averaged. An average pressure needs to be obtained before the pressure is used

with the EOS to determine the enthalpy. Further details on pressure measurements are presented in

Section 6.1.

Accurate gas flows are required to assure accurate power calculations. There are multiple types of flow

meters that can measure the flow rate. The accuracy of the flow measurement is dependent upon the level

of pulsations. Pulsations adversely affect the flow measurement. The flow meter should be placed in a

location with minimal pulsations. This is usually at a location far upstream or downstream from the

compressor, typically before the suction bottles or after the discharge bottles. The bottles on the

reciprocating compressors are acoustic filters which decrease the pulsation levels. The effects of

pulsations and selection of the flow meter are discussed in more detail in Section 6 of this guideline.

Custody transfer meters may be available for flow measurement. These can only be used if the

compressor being tested is the only one running and no gas is being consumed or lost at the station by any

other equipment. The flow rate may also be obtained from calculations if the PV Card and Enthalpy Rise

methods are being used in conjunction with one another.

The process gas composition is needed for the calculation of the enthalpy from the EOS. The gas

composition is directly used to determine the properties of the gas, such as the isentropic exponent,

compressibility, density, and speed of sound. The gas composition should be measured continuously

during the test. The sample rate of the gas composition will depend upon the cycle time of the gas

chromatograph. Gas chromatographs are available with four-minute cycle times for an analysis up to

C6+. This will give the most accurate composition for the EOS calculations and also the multiple

composition measurements will be used to analyze the steadiness of the gas composition during the test.

A large variation in gas composition could make the test invalid. All components contributing 0.1 mol

percent or greater to the composition should be measured and recorded.

4.2.2 Uncertainty

Listed below are the potential sources of uncertainty in the Enthalpy Rise method. The effect of these

individual uncertainties on the results of the performance measurements will be discussed in Section 7.

Pulsations

AC or Electrical Noise

Sensor Accuracy

Sensor Calibration

Number of Sensors

Calculation of Enthalpy from EOS

Heat Loss on Bottles, Nozzle, Piping

Cooling of Compressor Cylinders

Mass Flow Measurement

Unsteady Operating Conditions

Theoretical Calculations/EOS

For the Enthalpy Rise method, the isentropic efficiency is calculated with the enthalpy differences from

experimental measurements and calculated isentropic relationships. Terms to account for heat losses and

cooling are included depending on where the measurements are taken. The equation used to calculate the

isentropic efficiency is shown above in Section 4.2.1.1.

4.3 PV Card and Enthalpy Rise Method

Depending on what the objectives of the performance tests are, either of the methods described above can

be used. In some instances, both methods may be needed in combination with each other. The Enthalpy

Rise method provides a good overall assessment of the compressor or the station. The PV Card method

could be used with this to focus in on the performance of individual cylinder ends of a compressor (if the

performance of not all of the individual cylinder ends is desired). The Enthalpy Rise method can also be

used to assess individual cylinders.

For example, a user would like to measure the overall efficiency of the compressor, but also test a few

cylinders of interest for diagnostics. In this case, the PV Card method would be used to diagnose the

cylinders of interest, but the Enthalpy Rise method could be used to assess the overall compressor

efficiency. This would prevent the user from having to instrument every cylinder with pressure

transducers.

5. TEST PREPARATION

A general procedure for a field test is outlined in Appendix A. Many of the individual tasks are discussed

below. A field test agenda or plan should be prepared prior to the test as this is an essential part of test

preparation. The optimum time to start planning for field testing is prior to the design of the compressor

packages and compressor station. The first step in the planning process is to determine the scope of the

field test and what level of uncertainty is desired for the measurements relative to budget constraints and

any contractual performance guarantees. Based upon the targeted uncertainty, temperature, pressure, and

flow measurement points, methodologies can be defined for the package and station design that will

ensure that the desired results can be achieved.

If a field test is going to be performed to validate the performance of a new installation, the purchaser

should specify where in the process stream that the design pressures and temperatures will be measured

for validation purposesas well as the EOS that will be used. For example, the locations could be at the

inlet and outlet flanges of a compressor cylinder or at the inlet and outlet flanges of the compressor

package piping. Specifying this requirement is important for two reasons. One is to ensure that the

package and station design includes the necessary connection points for mounting test instrumentation

without having to replace or rely on package instruments. The second is more of an application design

issue than it is a test issue. Nevertheless, it is an issue that, if overlooked, could result in the compressor

not meeting the purchasers requirements. If the design and validation points are going to be in locations

other than the compressor cylinder flanges (such as package limits), then the pressure losses predicted

from any acoustical study need to be included in the compressor performance calculations. While this

may appear to be a trivial point, there have been industry cases where erroneous pressures losses were

used during compressor/driver selection and the expected performance was not achieved.

The test plan should include field conditions and equipment layout, instruments to be used and their

location, method of operation, test safety considerations, and the pressure, temperature and flow limits of

the facility. Piping and station layouts should be made available. Any deviations from normal operation

that may be necessary to conduct the test should also be provided.

2. The selected approach for determining the test uncertainty.

3. The acceptance criteria (specified in terms of maximal uncertainty allowable).

4. The EOS to be used for all calculations in the test.

Test preparations should also include a discussion on possible operating conditions and operational

limitations. In many cases, a specified operating point can only be maintained for a limited period of time

(for example, because the pipeline operation depends upon the tested package) or at fixed ambient

conditions.

The requirements for installation of test instrumentation need to be communicated early (even during

construction of the station), because instrumentation is part of the overall station design. The selection

and calibration of the test instrumentation is important. Generally, the instruments supplied for

monitoring and protection of the packages are not accurate enough to meet the stringent requirements

necessary for a field test (redundant measurement requirements, small uncertainty margins, detailed

sensor location placement, and proper flow measurement). Whenever possible, calibrated laboratory

quality instrumentation should be installed for the tests (refer to Section 6). The accuracy of the

instruments and the calibration procedure should be such that the measurement uncertainty is reduced to

the best attainable uncertainty under ideal conditions (see Section 7).

A meeting between the test engineer, the parties involved (supplier, operator, etc.) and the customer to

discuss test procedures and the situation on-site should be conducted in advance of the performance test.

The site P&ID, Site Layout, and Mechanical Installation Drawing diagrams should be obtained (if

available) and used in preparation for the performance test.

During the pre-test meeting, the parties should reach an agreement on the test purposes, test procedures,

safety requirements, the availability of full bore shut-off valves on compressor cylinders, responsibilities

during the test (including who has authority to make quick decisions if problems arise during testing),

availability of necessary operating conditions, and acceptance conditions.

The test engineer should verify that the unit has been proven suitable for continuous

operation and in good mechanical condition.

A mechanical assessment should be performed on the compressor before the performance

test is conducted. This should include inspection of suction and discharge valves, piston

rings, and packings. If these are found to have wear, they need to be replaced before the

performance test. If the valves cannot be replaced for any reason, the valves should be

evaluated for degradation. An estimation should be made of their affect on the

performance of the compressor. Compressor valves that have high wear will affect the

power and efficiency of the compressor. A mechanical condition analysis using an

engine/compressor analyzer, performed at a highest achievable compression ratio, could be

substituted for a physical inspection.

If the driver performance will be measured during the test, then a mechanical assessment of

the driver is needed as well. The user should ensure that the engine is in good working

order and tuned before the performance test is conducted.

Sufficient gas should be available for the anticipated flow and conditions for the duration of

the test.

If an online system is installed with cylinder pressure measurements, some planning,

discussion, and agreement should be reached on how the field test instruments will be

installed with the existing instrumentation. Consideration should be given as to how the

installation of the instrumentation will affect the operation. Will new vibrations result from

the installation of the instruments or new fittings and valves?

All instrumentation should be calibrated in the range in which it will be operated during the

test. Check all instrument readings (temperature, pressure, flow, and speed) to assure that

the sensors are functioning properly. Verify data acquisition system operation prior to

starting the field performance test.

All RTDs or thermocouples used in the test should use spring load type fittings, or when

necessary, the thermowells will be serviced with oil or other approved heat transfer

material. Accuracy must be within 0.1 deg F.

If thermowells are used during the test and a large portion of the thermowell is exposed to

the atmosphere, the area around the exposed portion should be insulated to preclude the

ambient air from affecting the temperature reading.

Check insertion depth of thermowells (see Table 6-2).

Where pressure taps involve tubing runs, the tubing should be checked for leaks.

The proper number of capable personnel should be on site to ensure that all the data can be

recorded in a reasonable amount of time.

Check the fixed clearance. If testing a new compressor in the field, the manufacturers

supplied value for fixed clearance may be used, but if testing an existing compressor, then

this value needs to be checked. The effective fixed clearance can vary from the design

fixed clearance because of the influence of cylinder operational problems, compressor

valve leakage, piston ring leakage, pulsation effects, valve losses, ineffective cylinder

pockets, etc. In addition, the measured clearances may vary from design clearances if the

pocket shutoff valves are partially opened or closed.

There are several methods that can be used to measure the compressor cylinder

clearance. The first is by filling the cylinder with a metered volume of liquid. This

method can be very difficult in the field due to leaks past piston rings and out of

discharge valves. It usually involves filling the entire cylinder bore and using valve

blanks. Another method is using the effective volume calculated by the PV analyzer.

However, this method is subject to error due to valve leaks, piston ring leaks, heat

exchange within the cylinder, error in ODC position, and restrictive flow paths to

clearance pockets. The actual and effective clearances are not equal due to error effects

mentioned above. This method can be effectively used if the uncertainty in the

measurement is accounted for.

Prepare data acquisition system by installing any required programs or generating data

collection protocols. If possible, use a data acquisition system that will automatically

calculate the results of the field data such as PV diagrams, ICHP, efficiency, and flow, so

that they can be quickly reviewed in the field for any discrepancies.

Communicate with the station operators where access to the compressor will be required

(indicator ports, flywheel for ODC, removal of compressor valve, etc.) so that the proper

work permits can be generated for the tasks.

Ensure that the instrumentation and data acquisition system used for testing meets the

required hazardous classifications for temporary work or local safety requirements at the

compressor site (e.g., IEEE Class 1 Div 2 rating).

Ensure that all safety and contractual documents are in place before mobilizing to the test

site.

Prior to running the field performance test, the following should be performed:

Verify fuel and site load to assure continuous operation of the unit at full-load conditions as

required at the time of the test.

Perform a visual walk-through of the compressor package to eliminate any sources of hot

air ingestion or recirculation.

Consult with gas control on station operation and verify the compressor can be run at the

guarantee point or testing condition (specific gas, speed, pressure, and temperatures). If the

test is not run at the guarantee point, then consult with the compressor manufacturer to

obtain performance predictions for the conditions that will be tested.

If the test is going to be conducted on a closed loop, check if gas cooling is available and if

recirculation of gas is an option during the field test. Notify all parties of the time frame

for the test.

Determine how load steps will be maintained constant during a test point and how they will

be changed for different test points.

Consult with station operators about the gas samples or compositional analyses that will be

required for the performance test.

The following information should be obtained from the test preparation and pre-test meeting:

General

Predicted performance curves for compressor (or existing test curves).

If a guarantee point is being tested, the manufacturer of the compressor or the

packager needs to be involved with the performance predictions for the test

conditions. If the test conditions follow closely with the original performance

specified for the compressor, then these can be used for the comparison. If the

test conditions vary greatly from the original performance predictions, then the

manufacturer needs to be contacted in order to obtain performance predictions

that will be in line with the performance test results. Table 5-1 details maximum

permissible deviations from the manufacturers specified performance. This

table has been adapted from ISO 1217.

Piping geometry between compressor and test instrumentation.

Compressor configuration for testing: deactivated valves, pocket clearances, and

suction valve loading.

Table 5-1. Maximum Deviations from Specified Values and Fluctuations from Average Readings

Maximum Permissible

Maximum Permissible

Deviations from

Measured Variable Fluctuations During

Manufacturer Specified

Performance Test

Performance

Suction Pressure 10 % 1%

Discharge Pressure Not specified 1%

Pressure Ratio 5% Not specified

Suction Temperature Not specified 2K

Isentropic Constant 3% Not specified

Gas Constant x Compressibility Factor, RZ 5% Not specified

Shaft Speed 4% 1%

Difference between suction temperature of 10 K for coolant air 2K

external coolant and gas suction temperature 5 K for coolant water 2K

External coolant flow 10 % 10 %

Temperature at the nozzle or orifice plate Not specified 2K

Differential pressure over nozzle or orifice plate Not specified 2%

NOTES

1. The test can be performed if the deviations from the specified conditions are equal to or less than the deviation

tolerances.

2. If the deviation from test conditions results in a deviation in absorbed power higher than 10 % then the test is not

within the limits.

3. A test at a shaft speed different from the specified value is not accepted if unpermitted resonant pressure pulsations

occur.

4. For the test of a gas compressor with a gas different from that specified, a bigger variation in gas properties often

occurs. This should be agreed upon by both parties.

PV Card Method

Compressor Geometry: Bore diameter, stroke length, connecting rod diameter,

connecting rod length, clearance volume, pressure transducer port geometry (length and

diameter), pocket volumes, load step definitions, valve types (poppet, plate, ring, reed,

or channel), and unloader mechanisms.

Enthalpy Rise Method

Flow meter information: Pipe ID, orifice bore or beta ratio (for orifice meter), K-factor

(for turbine or vortex shedding meter), flow coefficient (for annubar or nozzle) scaling

frequency, configuration log (for ultrasonic meter or to adjust turbine or mass flow

meters).

Before conducting the performance test, a test matrix should be developed to include all operating

conditions to be tested and how they are to be achieved. This should consider the objective of the test.

The test planner should examine what performance curves are needed for the compressor. Parameters,

such as suction pressure, compressor speed, and clearance, should be considered. The test planner should

discuss the test matrix with the compressor operator to ensure that all the operating conditions can be met.

If testing requires more than one test day, have a plan in place on how to leave the compressor in an

operational state overnight. This will allow the station to operate as needed when testing is not occurring.

The plan may include removal of some instrumentation or plugging various ports.

5.5 Test Stability

In order to obtain steady state conditions, the compressor should be started prior to the initiation of the

test (compressors require at least 30 minutes of heat soak time and engines require 1-2 hours of soak

time). The field test should be performed when the compressor operating conditions have reached steady

state. Also, the operating conditions should stay constant during each test point. To determine if the

compressor has reached steady state, estimate how long it will take to collect all the required

measurements either through experience or a trial collection run. This collection time will be the length

of time between each check for test stability. For example, if it takes 10 minutes to collect all the test

data, then the stability parameters, such as pressure and temperature values, should be checked at 10-

minute intervals to verify whether or not the compressor operation is steady. The compressor stability

should be determined from the criteria discussed below.

Power fluctuations should not occur during the performance testing. As it is very difficult to determine

fuel gas composition variations during the short test intervals, it is important to ensure that the fuel and

process gas compositions will remain unchanged for the duration of the testing period for each test point.

Multiple or continuous gas samples should be taken during the test to ensure that the compressor remains

at a steady state during one test point. Also, multiple gas samples of the process gas and fuel gas must be

taken for each test point if the gas composition significantly changes (heating value change of more than

1.0%) in between test points.

Temperature measurements will especially be affected by any instability during the test. Temperature

probes reach equilibrium through relatively slow heat transfer and heat soaking, while the system

operating conditions vary at much faster rates. The heat storing capacity of the compressor and system

piping will need adequate time to reach equilibrium after any operating conditions have changed. It is,

thus, critical to maintain extended stable operating conditions prior to beginning the test in order to reach

thermal equilibrium and measure accurate gas temperatures.

When using the PV Card method, pressure measurements on cylinder ends may be made one at a time,

depending upon the number of pressure transducers on hand. If the pressure measurements are made

consecutively (one or two at a time) then the stability of the test needs to be maintained throughout the

full set of pressure measurements. Any stability changes during these measurements should be

considered in the uncertainty. The stability of the compressor can be monitored by considering other

continuous measurements, such as compressor speed, temperature, and gas composition. Cylinder load

steps should be maintained through a test point.

Regardless of the assumption of steady state test operation, any variation in measured parameters during

the test interval should be accounted for in the uncertainty calculation. Note that an increase in pressure

ratio due to drift during the test will cause an increase in the temperature as well, though the temperature

change will lag behind the pressure change. Refer to Section 7 on uncertainty for more discussion of

unsteady conditions and drifting conditions during a test. These added uncertainties due to drift during

the test interval are in addition to non-ideal effects discussed in Section 7.

The compressor should be operated for at least 30 minutes prior to the test. Steady state is achieved if the

compressor measurements listed in Table 5-1 (in the maximum permissible fluctuations during

performance test column) applies during a test interval. Also, the following performance conditions

shown in Table 5-2 should be satisfied:

Table 5-2. Additional Assessment of Stability of Compressor During Pre-Test

Test Reading

Test Interval

Efficiency Fluctuations < + 1% of Average

Enthalpy Rise + 1% of Average Value

Compressor Flow + 1% of Average Value

Before readings are taken for any individual test point, engine steady state operating conditions must be

achieved. The engine must be heat soaked according to manufacturer specifications. If manufacturer

specifications are not available, the engine should be heat soaked for at least 1 hour. To verify stability of

the engine, the parameters given in Table 5-3 should be checked.

Test Reading

Test Interval

Driver Speed + 1% Average Speed

Fuel Flow + 2% Average Flow

Motor Current + 2% Average Current

If unsteady operations cannot be avoided during the test interval, measurements may still be valid, but the

fluctuations have to be accounted for in the uncertainty calculations of the results. Also, if this is a

factory performance test, the purchaser can specify criterion for fluctuations. If fluctuations during the

test exceed quasi-steady conditions, as given in Table 5-1 through Table 5-3, the test may need to be

performed again. For measurement cases where there is a simple drift in the average operating condition,

the criteria listed above should be employed to determine whether a data point is steady. If the drift in

any of the instrument readings exceeds the steady state conditions (as defined in Table 5-1 through Table

5-3), it is difficult to determine any valid performance results from this measured data because of the high

degree of interdependence of all measured parameters and the system as a whole. Namely, as the validity

of the data depends on the rate of drift, heat storage capacity of the pipe and measurement system, and the

frequency response of the transducers, a total uncertainty cannot be determined.

On the other hand, if the fluctuations in the data can be determined to be varying around a mean value,

without the average drifting significantly, the resultant measurement error is primarily due to a time lag of

the temperature transducers. Namely, while the pressure and flow transducers generally measure at a

high frequency and, thus, capture rapid operating changes accurately, the temperature transducers lag due

to the requirement of complete heat soaking of the piping and measurement system. Thus, if the

fluctuations produce a mean performance value, the criteria for acceptance of unsteady operation can be

extended to allow up to twice (i.e., factor-of-two range) the fluctuations listed in Table 5-1 and Table 5-2

for compressor steady state testing. In these cases, the fluctuations must be accounted for in the

uncertainty calculation. The uncertainty of the measurement then becomes the fluctuation instead of the

instrument uncertainty due to calibration, installation, data acquisition, and the device itself. As this can

generally result in very high total uncertainties for efficiency and power, one should carefully evaluate

whether to accept this test data. Also, once this factor-of-two range is exceeded, the non-linear behavior

of the system as a whole makes it unrealistic to determine accurate performance results from experimental

data. Figure 5-1 shows examples of a measurement that has a drift or fluctuations around the mean value.

The graph does not show actual measurements. The fluctuation and drift in the figures are exaggerated.

121

Average

Drift

120.8 Fluctuating

120.6

Temperature (deg F)

120.4

120.2

120

119.8

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Time (minutes)

Safety considerations should remain a priority during the pre-test phase, as well as the actual testing of the

compressor. Abnormal operating conditions should be discussed with station personnel prior to running

the test. If possible, a schematic of the yard piping should be given to all test personnel. Unit vibration

equipment operation should be verified. When cables are run to test instrumentation, the cables should be

covered with mats or correctly taped down (if possible) to reduce trip hazards. Cable connections should

be secured. Site specific hazardous location requirements for instrumentation, cables, and devices should

be followed. Aviation type headsets can be useful during the testing for quick communication and can

help the testers maintain a safe testing environment. Finally, the requirements of the field test should not

be given priority over station safety precautions in order to reduce measurement uncertainty or meet test

schedules.

6. MEASUREMENT AND INSTRUMENTATION

The reciprocating compressor cylinders, pulsation bottles, and piping must be equipped to measure the

test variables shown in Figure 4-2 and Figure 4-9, depending on which data collection procedure is used

and the objective of the test. All pressure test points must have appropriate test taps in the proper place to

record pressure and temperatures. This is the responsibility of the design engineers and constructors. All

test taps should utilize dampers for accurate results.

For testing purposes, a dedicated set of laboratory quality instrumentation should be utilized. This

dedicated set of test instrumentation should be maintained and calibrated before each test using acceptable

reference standards. A valid calibration certificate for all measurement instrumentation is recommended.

An end-to-end calibration of the data acquisition system, wiring, and instrumentation is also

recommended prior to the field test but may not always be practical.

If possible, all measurement instrumentation should be installed inside the branch piping to the

compressors recirculation or bypass flow loop, such that the measured values represent the true flow

through the compressor. The bypass loop should not offer undue restriction to flow. Ideally, the bypass

uses a full open type valve and a line size not more than one size smaller than the discharge line. If the

test instrumentation is located outside the recycle loop for the compressor, the recycle valve must be fully

closed during the tests for the results to be valid. If the recycle is part of the normally active flow control

system, then this system may need to be disabled or the recycle may need to be actively controlled to

achieve certain test conditions.

A piping configuration using a closed loop through the compressor or station recycle line may also be

utilized for the performance testing of the compressor. In this case, a process gas cooler on the discharge

of the compressor will generally be required to maintain the gas temperature stable in the closed loop

piping system which results from this configuration. Also, for this test scenario, the effects of gas lean

out must be considered as the heavier components in the test gas may liquefy and drop out due to

sequential compression and cooling. If the test is run on a closed loop, then prior to the performance test,

the compressor should be run in the closed loop configuration while monitoring the gas using an online

gas chromatograph until there is no significant change in the gas composition.

Pressure transducers are selected and installed depending upon the objective and methodology of the

performance test. If the PV Card method is used, a pressure transducer which can detect the dynamic

change in pressure is required for the cylinder pressure measurement. The Enthalpy Rise method requires

a more steady pressure measurement upstream and downstream of the compressor. If this measurement is

made at the cylinder nozzles, the pressure has strong variations due to pulsations. In this case, a pressure

transducer with dynamic capabilities is required. If the pressure measurements are made upstream or

downstream of the bottles, the pressure variation may be low enough where a static pressure transducer

may be used. Static pressure transducers typically have a much lower drift than dynamic pressure

transducers. If the transducers are calibrated for the performance test, the drift of the instrumentation may

not be a concern.

The ambient pressure also needs to be measured. The cylinder pressure will be a gage pressure and needs

to be made absolute before completing any calculations. The ambient pressure can often be obtained

from a local airport weather station, but in some cases this is not sufficient. In areas with significant

elevation changes or a varying landscape, such as in the mountains, the ambient pressure will not be

consistent from one location to the next. An accurate atmospheric pressure measurement is also

important in applications with low suction pressure (< 50 psig, typically gas gathering applications) or

low pressure ratios. Below, the details of compressor pressure measurements for each performance test

methodology are discussed.

PV Card Method

For the PV Card method, a pressure measurement inside the cylinder is required. The pressure inside the

cylinder is constantly changing during the compression and expansion cycles and relatively steady state

during the suction and discharge events on a healthy cylinder. A strain gauge pressure transducer is

required due to the pressure variation. This transducer must be a DC coupled transducer with a high

frequency of response. On the compressor cylinder, there is an indicator port for the pressure transducer.

If the compressor does not have indicator ports, then the user will need to drill and tap a port for the

transducer if they choose to install the transducer on the bore of the cylinder.

Dynamic pressure transducers have a frequency of response. When testing high-speed compressors, this

is an important consideration when selecting the transducer. The transducer should be able to accurately

track the pressure changes without a phase delay in the frequency range of interest. Quality pressure

transducers can be found with frequency response ranges around 2,000 Hz. This frequency of response is

adequate for the reciprocating compressor performance testing as discussed in the guideline.

The Enthalpy Rise method requires strain gauge pressure measurements. Pulsations may be present

depending on where the transducers are installed. The sensor should have a high enough frequency of

response to track these pulsations without a phase delay.

Total (stagnation) pressure must always be used for performance calculations. However, it is often more

convenient to measure static pressures (Pstat) and then convert static to total pressure (P) using:

In Equation 6-1, the flow velocities can be calculated using the measured actual flow rate (referenced to

actual temperature and pressure conditions) and the pipe cross-sectional area (U=Q/A).

Whenever feasible, it is recommended to use four pressure taps and four temperature taps at the pressure

and temperature locations indicated in Figure 6-1, consistent with ASME PTC 10 recommendations. The

accuracy of the static pressure or temperature measurement is dependent upon the selected location. Four

pressure and temperature sensors assure that the average measurement of pressure or temperature will be

accurate, even in a non-uniform flow field. Additional pressure and temperature measurements can be

employed, if four sensors are not sufficient.

Two different approaches are appropriate for locating the suction and discharge pressure and temperature

taps. The first approach is to place measurement taps at locations relatively far upstream and downstream

from the compressor in the longest available straight pipe segment to assure a uniform flow field at the

transducer taps. These locations may be relatively far away from the compressor, so the pressure

measurement values must be corrected using empirical loss factors (i.e., pressure losses) for the straight

pipe, elbows, tees, reducer, pulsations bottles, and orifice plates that lie in between the measurement

location and the compressor inlet/discharge.

The second approach is recommended for field testing, if possible. The approach is to measure the

pressure and temperature as close as possible to the compressor, using multiple temperature and pressure-

taps at suction and discharge. Generally, the flow field near the compressor will be highly non-uniform

and, thus, at least four pressure and temperature taps should be used on both suction and discharge. Non-

uniformity of the flow field affects the uncertainty of the measurement data. If less than four transmitters

or test taps (for pressure or temperature) are available, the first measurement approach is recommended.

Using less than four pressure or temperature sensors will result in an increase in the total uncertainty for

pressure or temperature, as discussed in Section 7.

6.1.2 Installation

PV Card Method

Indicator ports on cylinder bores are used for installing pressure transducers. The transducer will be

installed on a valve attached to the port. If possible, avoid using additional connectors or adaptors

between the compressor and pressure transducers. This can be avoided by contacting the station in

advance and determining what type of transducer connections are available or installed. Any valves,

connectors, or fittings should be the straight through type in order to avoid having varying diameters or

gas volumes in the channel to the transducer. Installation of the sensor in this configuration tends to

produce other influences on the measurement, such as channel resonance and attenuation. It is not

advisable to leave these effects on the measurement. Channel resonance can be corrected after the

measurement is taken through data filtration. Channel resonance and attenuation are discussed in more

detail in Section 4.1.2.1.

Pressure and Temperature Measurement

Pressure transducers are subject to the temperature variations due to the compression and expansion of the

gas. The transducers may require heating depending on the type of transducer to maintain the transducer

at a constant temperature. If not, temperature compensation curves should be applied to the measured

values. It is best to calibrate the transducers after they have been allowed to heat soak when installed on

the machine. This will reduce the deviation of the signal due to temperature effects.

Pressure measurements in the cylinder nozzles should be made after the orifice plate or inside the cylinder

flange when possible. If the measurements are made before the orifice plate, then the pressure drop

across the orifice plate needs to be accounted for. Pulsations will be present in this location of the

compressor. Dynamic pressure transducers should be used for this measurement. Some compressors will

have taps on the cylinder passages which can be used for this measurement. If these are not present, then

a pressure tap should be installed on the cylinder nozzle.

Enthalpy Rise Method

The installation of the pressure measurement device, pressure tap size, and symmetry is critical to the

measurement accuracy. ASME PTC 10 provides specific guidelines for correct installation and location

of pressure probes. The pressure tapping should be inspected prior to installation of the pressure

measurement device. The tube and static tapping used to make the pressure measurement should have a

constant length to diameter ratio and must be greater than 2. The ratio between the pressure tubing and

the pipe diameter should be as small as possible to prevent the pressure measurement from altering the

flow pattern. In addition, the wall taps should be exactly perpendicular and flush to the surface. Burrs or

slag in the taps are not acceptable and will influence measurement accuracy.

6.1.3 Calibration

Prior to performing the field test, the transmitter or transducer should be calibrated, such that the

maximum device error is less than or equal to 0.1% of the actual value. However, this is only achievable

if the pressure transducer being used has accuracy to this level. The calibration procedure should contain

at least two points. One of the calibration points should be near the maximum pressure that will be

measured. The other point can be ambient pressure or another reference pressure. Due to the fact that

pressure transducers have linear responses, only two calibration points are required, but it is beneficial to

check the pressure on a third or more points. This will ensure the linearity of the transducer. The

calibration process will not eliminate all measurement errors, since the calibration process itself is subject

to non-linearities, hysteresis, and reference condition error.

Transducers should be recalibrated frequently. If possible, calibration at the test site is recommended. If

the sensors are calibrated at the test site, then they should be calibrated at least once a day. Some

common methods of calibration at the test site are with a pressurized manifold or with dead weights.

Ambient, suction or discharge pressure can be supplied to the manifold from the compressor. Calibration

at the test site is also convenient if transducers need to be replaced during or before testing.

In the PV Card method, the pressure measurement in the cylinder is subject to dynamic temperatures.

This can distort the pressure measurement. These sensors will be installed with temperature stabilizers

(either heaters or coolers) or have a temperature compensation curve (provided by sensor manufacturer).

If the sensors have temperature stabilizers, then the transducer needs to be calibrated at the temperature at

which it will operate. If not, then the zero reference of the transducer may shift during testing.

The precision uncertainty in pressure measurement will depend upon the uniformity of the flow field. For

static pressure measurements, if piping vibration or flow-induced pulsations are high, the measurement of

pressure will show a significantly higher random uncertainty. Non-uniformities, location, installation,

and calibration errors will affect the pressure measurement. The signal from the transmitter should be

transformed into a digital signal by means of a portable data acquisition system (DAQ). The data

acquisition system should have an instrumentation accuracy of better than 0.01 to 0.05% of reading.

For static pressure measurement, the main source of pressure measurement error is incorrect installation

and location of pressure probes. Table 6-1 provides typical values for sources of pressure measurement

errors encountered during field tests. All values are percent full scale. For cases of multiple static

transmitters, it is assumed that the transmitters are installed at equal angular intervals in the pipe and the

flow field is uniform. Table 6-1 assumes that the static transmitter installation meets the upstream and

downstream requirements of ASME PTC 10. Installation configurations, which do not meet ASME

PTC 10, will have significantly higher location uncertainties in pressure measurement. Table 6-1 shows

the uncertainty for two and four static transmitters to be the same. This can be true in an even flow field

with installations following ASME PTC 10. The four transmitters become valuable when ASME PTC 10

installation requirements cannot be met or the flow field is uneven. In this case, the four static

transducers will give a more accurate pressure measurement than the two transmitters (see Figure 6-1 for

ASME PTC 10 recommended installation).

(shown as percent of full scale)

1 2,3

Sensor Type Location Installation Calibration Device Acquisition Pulsations

One Static Transmitter 0.15 0.02 0.10 0.10 0.005 0 - 10

Two Static Transmitters 0.10 0.02 0.10 0.10 0.005 0 - 10

Four Static Transmitters 0.10 0.02 0.10 0.10 0.005 0 - 10

One Dynamic Transmitter 0.15 0.02 0.10 0.10 0.005 0

1

Errors in location will largely be dependent on uniformity of flow field at measuring location and the number of

pressure measurement devices used at a single location. Wall static error will cause high uncertainty if wall taps

are not correct. Wall taps should be exactly perpendicular to the surface and flush (with no burrs or slag). For

dynamic measurements in the compressor cylinder, the location errors are associated with channel resonance and

attenuation.

2

The error due to pulsation depends on the level of pulsation present. If pulsations are present, then a dynamic

transmitter should be used.

3

The error in the dynamic transmitter assumes that the sensor has a high enough frequency of response to detect

any changes in pressure.

The approach to measurement of temperature is dependent upon whether the PV Card or Enthalpy Rise

method is used. In the PV Card method, a suction and discharge temperature is recorded either in the

nozzles or outside of the bottles. The temperature in this testing serves two purposes. The first is to

verify that steady state has been reached. The second is to provide a temperature for generation of

theoretical PV diagram and calculation of the flow through the cylinder end. Typically, only one

temperature sensor, usually an RTD, is installed at each measurement location. The actual power

measurement is independent of the measured temperature, but the flow and efficiency are not.

In the Enthalpy Rise method, the calculated power and efficiency are dependent upon the measured

temperature. The temperature can be measured in the nozzles or outside the bottles. If the temperature is

measured outside the bottles, then any heat losses through the vessel walls should be accounted for. For

this method, it is best to use four temperature sensors in order to identify any inconsistent measurements

due to varying flow field. The temperature should be measured downstream of the pressure, if possible.

The pressure and temperature sensors should not be installed in the same line of sight.

Thermocouples, thermistors, and resistance temperature devices (RTDs) are typically used to measure

temperature. RTDs are recommended for measurement of temperature in the flow stream over a broad

temperature range. Thermocouples can be used for high temperature measurements, but below 200F the

resolution will be reduced. Also, thermocouples tend to drift more than RTDs and, thus, require more

frequent recalibration. At low temperatures, thermistors are useful but should be carefully calibrated

because of inherent non-linearities.

6.2.2 Installation

These devices should be inserted into a thermowell, though RTD sensors may be used as direct insert

devices. Direct insert RTDs will provide a faster response time. The RTD-thermowell configuration

should have the highest recovery factor possible to accurately measure stagnation temperature. The

temperature sensor should be instrumented to a temperature transmitter that is connected to the field test

data acquisition system. The measurement location should assure that the temperature sensor will be

relatively insensitive to radiation, convection, and conduction between the temperature sensor and all

external bodies. The insertion depth can produce a large error in the temperature measurement if the

sensor is placed too deep or too shallow in the flow stream (see Table 6-2). The manufacturers safety

guideline should be consulted for insertion depth of RTDs without thermowells and extra long

thermowells to ensure the pipe velocity meets acceptable safety levels.

The ASME PTC 10 standard provides specific guidelines for proper installation and location of

temperature sensors. Though the field test constraints may make ideal measurement locations impossible,

it is important to be aware of the required specifications to assess measurement error and the propagation

of additional measurement uncertainty (see Section 7.2 on uncertainty in non-ideal installations).

Pipe Diameter (inches) Thermowell Depth (inches)

6 2.0

8 2.5-3.0

10 3.0-3.5

12 4.0

14 4.5-5.0

16 5.0-5.5

18 6.0

>18 7.5 minimum

Note: Above 18-inch diameter, a minimum depth of 7.5 inches from the inner

wall is enough to avoid pipe influence and breakage.

6.2.3 Calibration

The temperature sensor shall be calibrated, such that the maximum measurement uncertainty for each

sensor is less than or equal to 0.1F. Transmitters used in acquiring data from the temperature sensor

should be calibrated in tandem (i.e., the transmitter used to read the signal from the RTD should be

calibrated with the RTD as a single measurement chain). The calibration procedure should involve at

least three points. The calibration process can introduce errors into the temperature measurement,

primarily through non-linear response, instrument drift, cold junction, and reference temperature error.

Table 6-3 provides typical uncertainty values for the five main sources of temperature measurement errors

encountered during field tests. Uncertainties in the temperature originate from the following five major

sources of error: (1) location: incorrect position of the thermal sensor in the gas stream; (2) installation:

wall conduction heat transfer to and from the sensor due to inadequate insulation; (3) calibration:

instrument drift, non-linearities, cold junction, and reference temperature errors; (4) device: inherent

accuracy limitations of the sensor device; and (5) acquisition: amplifier, transmission, noise, read, and

analog-digital conversion errors.

Location, installation, and calibration errors may be minimized easily in production or laboratory test

facilities. However, for field testing, this is more difficult because time and cost constraints can force the

test engineer to accept field test arrangements with improperly located, installed, and calibrated

instruments. While it is often impossible to correct these problems during the short field test duration, it

is imperative to recognize them and account for them in the uncertainty analysis.

Table 6-3 shows that the location, installation, and calibration errors are the dominant factors, while the

device and acquisition errors are a smaller contribution to the total temperature error. Also, note that field

test device and acquisition errors are significantly larger than values quoted by instrument manufacturers

(>0.005 percent full scale). Again, the circumstances and limitations encountered in the field test may not

always allow for ideal handling of the sensitive measurement instruments.

Table 6-3 assumes that the installation meets the upstream and downstream requirements of ASME

PTC 10 for temperature sensor installation. Installation configurations, which do not meet ASME

PTC 10, will have significantly higher location uncertainties in temperature measurement.

(shown as percent of full scale)

1

Sensor Type Location Installation Calibration Device Acquisition

Hg Thermometer 0.10 0.20 0.03 0.03 0.10

Thermistor 0.10 0.20 0.10 0.05 0.05

Thermocouple 0.10 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.05

RTD 0.10 0.20 0.05 0.05 0.05

Infrared Sensor 0.40 0.20 0.10 0.25 0.05

1

Location error is based on having four (4) equally spaced sensors in the pipe and assumes uniform flow in the

pipe. For a single sensor installation, the location uncertainty should be multiplied by four (4). For two (2)

sensors, the location uncertainty should be multiplied by two (2). For highly non-uniform flow or pulsating flow

fields these values may be larger.

An accurate measurement or calculation of the gas flow through a compressor is essential for proper

determination of the performance and is necessary to identify degradation in the performance of a

compressor. The most common meter type installed at gas compressor field sites is orifice meters. Other

meters that are available at some times are full bore turbine meters, ultrasonic meters, flow nozzles, and a

range of insertion type meters, such as vortex shedding meters, insertion turbine meter, and multi-port

pitot probes. Fuel gas flow rates are also measured with these common meters, including orifice, turbine,

insertion, and Coriolis mass flow meters. The proper sizing, installation, maintenance, adjustments, and

calibrations are necessary for any of these meters to achieve the desired level of precision and

repeatability in flow measurement.

Orifice, ultrasonic, and turbine flow meters are typically employed to measure pipeline flow at a high

level of accuracy. However, proper installation, maintenance, and calibration are critical to achieve a

desired level of precision and repeatability. All three meter types have upstream length requirements,

which may be mitigated through the use of a flow conditioner.

When installed correctly with a properly calibrated differential pressure transducer, an orifice flow meter

may be used to measure flow over a 3:1 range with an accuracy of 1.5%. Turbine meters have a greater

flow range than orifice meters. Turbine meters are very repeatable in both high and low flow situations

and can provide accuracies better than 1.0% depending upon the quality of calibration. A calibrated

ultrasonic meter will provide flow measurement accuracy better than 1.0%.

The upstream piping configurations at field compressor installation are normally not ideal and result in

distorted velocity profiles at the meter. Non-ideal meter piping will result in errors in the flow

measurement unless something is done to correct the metering configuration. AGA Report No. 3,

ISO 5167, AGA Report No. 7, and AGA Report No. 9 should be referenced for the installation and

calibration of various flow meters.

Pulsation adversely affects most types of meters and, therefore, must be avoided during reciprocating

compressor performance testing. However, as most flow measurement instruments provide a low

frequency output response, it is often difficult to determine pulsation magnitudes and frequencies. RMS

output variation on the flow meter can be used to estimate pulsation amplitudes, but flow turbulence also

contributes to RMS flow velocity and pressure variations. AGA Report No. 3 defines that when the

pressure differential or the velocity fluctuations across the measurement device exceed 10% RMS value,

the flow meter results cannot be considered valid.

In order to calculate flow accurately for an orifice meter, the temperature, pressure, gas composition, and

differential pressure must be measured accurately. Properly sized orifice meters are suitable for testing

reciprocating compressors over a normal operating range. Orifice meters are highly susceptible to

installation-effects resulting from improperly conditioned flow, insufficient upstream length, upstream

bends, elbows or valves, or extreme beta ratios (>0.65). If installed correctly with a beta ratio less than

0.65, orifice meters will provide a flow measurement accuracy of 1.5% or better.

Turbine meters can be calibrated to obtain a measurement uncertainty of 1.0% or better. If the gas

pressure or flow rate is outside the calibration curve, the measurement will contain a bias error, which can

be as large as 1.5 to 2.0% additional measurement uncertainty. If a turbine meter is over-ranged by

exceeding its maximum velocity, permanent damage to the rotor may cause the measurement uncertainty

of the meter to exceed 2.0%.

The accuracy of an ultrasonic meter decreases at flow velocities of less than 5 to 7 feet per second and at

high flow velocities, above 70 to 90 feet per second. Therefore, ultrasonic meters should only be used for

compressor testing, if the flow range in the pipe is between 5 to 70 ft/sec. Ultrasonic meters should not be

oversized, such that low flow velocities routinely occur, or undersized, such that high velocities are

experienced. The field accuracy of ultrasonic meters is normally in the range of 0.5 to 1.0% and is based

on the meters calibration and having a suitable piping configuration.

Other differential pressure devices (annubar, v-cone, etc.) and Venturi meters (sonic nozzles) may also be

used to measure gas flow through the compressor. These meter types typically have a lower pressure loss

than an orifice meter, but the flow measurement error is highly sensitive to the measurement of

differential pressure across the device. Typical meter accuracy is 0.5 to 1.5% if the differential pressure

sensor is calibrated and operating well within its range. Venturi meters and differential pressure (DP)

type meters are similar to an orifice meter, in that large installation errors can occur (1 to 5%) if installed

incorrectly. Installation guidelines for Venturi meters are provided in ISO 5167, Measurement of Fluid

Flow by Means of Orifice Plates, Nozzles and Venturi Tubes, and ASME MFC-3M-1989, Measurement

of Fluid Flow in Pipes Using Orifice, Nozzle and Venturi Tubes. All differential pressure flow devices

must meet a test protocol standard specified in American Petroleum Institute Manual of Petroleum

Measurement Standards (API MPMS) Chapter 5.7, Testing Protocol for Differential Pressure Flow

Measurement Devices. Specific installation requirements for DP type meters should be provided by the

meter manufacturer and should assure that the meter conforms to API MPMS Chapter 5.7. Table 6-4

summarizes the achievable accuracies of the various flow meters.

Achievable

Type of Flow Meter Measurement

Uncertainty (%)

Orifice Plate 1.0 - 1.5

Turbine Meter 1.0

Ultrasonic Meter 0.5 - 1.0

Annubar 0.5 - 1.5

Hot Wire Anemometer 1.0 - 2.0

Tracer Gas 2.0

Both the engine fuel gas and compressor process gas composition should be evaluated at regular intervals

throughout the field test, either through automatic gas chromatograph sampling or by taking regular gas

samples. This is particularly true in applications where the gas composition can vary significantly within

the course of one day such as in gas gathering applications. Depending on which method is used for the

test, the varying gas composition can affect the power, efficiency, and capacity calculations. At a

minimum, a gas sample should be taken before and after the test. Multiple sampling methods are defined

in GPA Standard 2166 and the American Petroleum Institute Manual of Petroleum Measurement

Standards (API MPMS) Chapter 14.1. These include both spot methods and composite sampling (on-line

methods). If possible, the gas sample should be taken near the compressor to ensure that it is

representative of the gas flowing through the compressor. A gas sample downstream from the gas plant

can be more or less meaningless for testing a field gathering unit, although this is often what customers

provide.

If an automatic sampling probe is used (such as a gas chromatograph probe regulator), the probe should

be properly sized to draw samples from the center one-third of the pipe, so that liquids that may appear in

the flow cannot be easily ingested into the probes and sample lines. Velocities in the location where

samples are taken should not exceed 150 ft/sec in order to avoid possible probe vibration and failure.

To properly determine the gas properties from the gas samples, the gas composition should evaluate all

components that contribute at least 0.1 mol percent to the composition. Namely, as a minimum, the gas

samples should be analyzed for all hydrogen, oxygen, water, sulfur compounds, carbon dioxide, nitrogen,

nitrous oxides, other inert gasses, and all hydrocarbon gasses or vapors between C1 and C6.

If the hydrocarbon dewpoint of the gas mixture is within 0 to 20C of the temperature of the sampling

equipment or above the temperature of the sampling equipment (ambient temperature), then additional

precautions must be taken. The hydrocarbon dewpoint will vary with different gas mixtures and primarily

be influenced by the presence of heavier hydrocarbons, above C6. The best practice in this case is to pre-

heat the sample line and sampling containers prior to taking the gas sample. If pre-heating is not

practical, dead-end spot sampling methods may be used in combination with re-heating the sample

above the mixture dewpoint during the analysis process. In addition, if the dewpoint is close to the

operating temperature, the compressor should be run for a minimum of two hours after start-up to make

sure the gas temperature and composition are relatively stable to expect consistent and reliable data.

Dead-end spot sampling methods include the water or glycol displacement method, the piston

displacement method, the evacuated cylinder methods (evacuated, reduced pressure, or helium pop), and

the fill and empty method. These methods work best because the depleted gas is not convected out of the

cylinder in the sampling process. If condensate is formed on the wall of the sampling cylinder, re-heating

the sample will cause the condensate to re-vaporize as part of the sampled gas mixture.

6.4.2 Installation

All sampling lines and equipment that come in contact with the sample streams should be made of

stainless steel or other materials that are inert, compatible with the gas and minimize adsorption of heavy

hydrocarbons from the gas stream. Polyethylene, Nylon, and Teflon will cause sample distortion because

of these materials preferential absorption of specific hydrocarbon components. The probes and lines

should be insulated to avoid condensation of the heavier hydrocarbon constituents or water vapor in the

sample. The probes and sample lines should also be arranged above the pipeline. As stated in API

MPMS Chapter 14.1, the sampling bottle should have a pigtail line connected to its outlet to assure that

the process gas is kept above the hydrocarbon dewpoint (see Figure 6-4 below). Prior to sampling the

gas, the gas sampling equipment should be cleaned, preferably by steam cleaning or using acetone or

liquid propane.

Filters in the sample lines are required in most cases. All fittings, tubing, and pressure regulators should

be rated for the appropriate operating pressure of the station.

Figure 6-2. Sampling Method with Pigtail as Recommended in API MPMS Chapter 14.1

6.4.3 Calibration

Gas chromatographs are almost exclusively used to determine the gas chemical composition, in order to

determine gas density, compressibility, and energy content. A gas chromatograph should not be regarded

as an infallible device. A calibration gas standard should be used to calibrate the gas chromatograph

regularly. The gas chromatograph should be calibrated at the beginning of each test day. The calibration

standard should have a composition and heating value comparable to the process gas. This calibration gas

should have a certified accuracy of at least 2% or better. The calibration gas should be blended in a

procedure traceable to NIST.

The test gas composition will almost always differ from the gas composition used in the baseline or

factory test. Errors in the determination of the gas composition will affect the density, compressibility,

and the energy content determination. Density errors will propagate in the flow measurement when

converting between mass and volume flow.

Online gas chromatographs must be calibrated regularly (at least once per day during performance

testing) to ensure accurate gas composition with a calibration gas that is similar in composition to the

processed gas being measured.

In the PV Card method, the crank position should be measured in order to know what the instantaneous

cylinder position is. Knowing the geometry of the compressor, the volume at that instant can be

calculated. With the pressure measurement, the PV diagram can be constructed.

Two types of sensors are used for the crank position measurement: encoders and once-per-revolution

sensors (key phasor, tachometer, magnetic pick-up, etc.). Caution should be taken when using a once-

per-revolution sensor. During a full rotation of the crankshaft, there are velocity variations, which would

not be accounted for in a single revolution type sensor. If angular velocity and acceleration variations are

present with a key phasor in use, this can result in an incorrect reference to ODC. If the once-per-rev

signal does not trigger at ODC, then the ODC can be occurring at a different location each time. Also, the

data acquisition system will collect pressure transducer signals at specified time intervals. Because of the

variations, the calculated volumes and pressures may be not be properly matched. Small errors in

position measurement can have significant effects on the power calculation. An encoder should be used,

if at all possible.

An encoder typically has a metallic disc with multiple slots. The encoder employs a detection mechanism

that registers the position of the shaft at each of these slots. A 360 encoder will have 360 slots such that

its resolution is 1 deg. Higher count encoders can be used, such as 512, 720, etc. It is recommended to

use at least a 360 encoder.

The volume of the cylinder at the reported encoder position is calculated with Equation 6-2. Theta () is

the position of the shaft as reported by the encoder. When theta equals zero, the referenced cylinder end

is at ODC; and when theta equal 180 degrees, the referenced cylinder end is at IDC. The angle reported

by the encoder may need to have a phase shift applied if the zero angle is not referencing ODC on the

cylinder end being evaluated. For example, the ODC of the encoder may be referenced to the ODC for

the first cylinder in the compressor. Cylinder or throw 2 may be at IDC when cylinder 1 is at ODC.

Cylinder 2 would then have a 180 degree phase shift.

S

2

V = (1 cos ) l sin + l * B 2 + Vcl

2 S

2 2 4

(6-2)

6.5.2 Installation

The encoder is typically installed on the flywheel of the crankshaft for a slow speed integral

driver/compressor package. In high-speed separable compressor packages, the encoder may be installed

on the compressor frame opposite from the flywheel usually with some type of adapter. There is typically

an access point for the encoder installation. Figure 6-3 shows an example of an encoder installation on a

flywheel in a slow-speed compressor, and Figure 6-4 shows an encoder installation on a high-speed unit

with an adapter. It is necessary to ensure that there is no slippage between the flywheel and encoder. If

this occurs, then the results will be invalid. The encoder should be mounted to the flywheel with some

type of flexible coupling to avoid mechanical damage due to misalignment. Also, no misalignment can

be tolerated with a mechanical drive, as the instantaneous angular velocity of the encoder can be

significantly affected.

Avoid using multiple fittings on the shaft from the encoder to the compressor since this could lead to

alignment issues. It is recommended that multiple encoder shafts of varying length be taken to the test

site, due to the fact that the length required will not be known until the tester is at the test site. Every

effort should be made to ensure that the encoder rotation is representative of the compressor crankshaft

rotation. Avoid placing the encoder close to the opening on the compressor frame (usually on high speed

units), because oil vapors escaping from the opening can cause the encoder to malfunction.

6.5.3 Calibration

The encoder itself does not require calibration. The calibration for positional measurement is completed

through the determination of Outer Dead Center (ODC) and synchronization of the encoder. ODC refers

to the condition where the piston is at a point of travel furthest from the crankshaft (also referred to as top

dead center (TDC)). This is a critical step that determines how accurate your positional measurements

will be. Once ODC position is known, this can be related to the position of the encoder wheel, otherwise

known as synchronization.

Determination of ODC requires the compressor to be shut down for access to the flywheel (if there is

one). In some cases, such as process compressors, this is not possible. Usually an ODC mark will be

placed on the machine during installation and start-up or an initial performance test. This can be used as a

reference. In situations where there is no ODC mark and the compressor cannot be shutdown, the PV

diagram can be shifted during post-processing, such that the start of the expansion line is set at the

minimum clearance. This is not an exact science and the possible error of this should be accounted for in

the uncertainty. Note the effect this can have on the PV diagram, shown in Figure 6-5.

The universal approach to determine ODC is to mechanically position a reference piston to its ODC

position and mark the flywheel to a match mark on some member fixed to the frame. In principle, this

seems a simple procedure; however, in practice, it is the most frustrating task. This can be appreciated

when one considers that a 1-degree angular displacement about ODC amounts to only 0.0014 inch linear

displacement of a piston on an 18-inch stroke compressor, but the cumulative total of clearances in main

bearing journals, crank pin journals, and connecting rod bearings may be 0.015 or more. When marking

ODC, it is important to approach ODC from both rotational directions. This will cancel out the effects of

the clearances on the position of ODC.

When marking ODC, there are several considerations that could affect the reference. The first is where

ODC is marked. The most common approach is to mark ODC on the flywheel; however, this cannot or

should not always be done. In high-speed compressors, the flywheel is often installed between the

compressor and driver next to the coupling. If the flywheel is on the driver side of the coupling, then

consideration should be given to the type of coupling installed. With highly flexible couplings, such as

elastomeric couplings, there could be as much as 10 to 20 degrees of wind up during normal operation. If

a rigid coupling, such as a disk pack type is installed, then ODC can be measured on the flywheel on the

driver side.

The same consideration should be given for couplings on a compressor without a flywheel, such as an

electric motor driven compressor. If a highly flexible coupling is installed, then ODC should be marked

on the compressor side of the coupling. The section below describes a few methodologies commonly

used to determine ODC.

Rotate the compressor crankshaft until cylinder #1 is approximately at ODC (other cylinders can be used).

Install a dial indicator on the crosshead or crosshead guide of cylinder #1 (whichever is more practical).

Position the dial indicator, such that the probe is touching the crosshead or crosshead guide. Rotate the

compressor until the cylinder is approximately at ODC (the dial indicator will stop moving). Zero the

dial indicator.

Dial Indicator

on Crosshead

ODC Mark

Rotate the crankshaft in the opposite direction until it reaches 0.03. Rotate the crankshaft back in the

other direction until the dial indicator reads 0.015. Mark this location on the flywheel. Rotate the

crankshaft in the same direction until the dial indicator reads 0.03 (the compressor will progress through

ODC and pass it, so the dial indicator will read 0 and then go back to 0.03). Rotate the crankshaft back

the other direction until the dial indicator reads 0.015. Mark this location on the flywheel.

Using an accurate distance measurement, make the center between these two marks on the flywheel. This

is the location of ODC. Rotate the crankshaft back to the marks made (using the procedure above) and

check the locations of the marks. If the locations are repeatable, then the ODC marking is satisfactory. If

not, repeat the process again.

Another method of locating ODC is known as the positive stop method. No dial indicator is required for

this procedure; however, the cylinder head or valve cap must be removed so the unit must be blown

down. The basis of this method is that ODC can be determined from the midpoint of two piston positions

marked on the flywheel. These piston positions are determined by the placement of the piston at a fixed

distance from ODC. This fixed distance is determined by the hard stop used.

The first step in this process is to obtain the hard stop. The stop can be inserted into the cylinder by

removing the valve assembly or the cylinder head. If the cylinder head is removed, obtain a stiff 1/4-inch

rod or similar material and sharpen one end to form a pointer. The length of the rod should be set, such

that the piston stops at 2 to 10 degrees below ODC. Attach this pointer to a stout strip of steel and drill

the appropriate mounting holes in it. Be sure that the strip of steel is rigid enough so that it will not be

deflected when the piston contacts the center bolt stop. This strip is placed across the center of the

cylinder bore and bolted on each end to secure it to the block. If the valve assembly is removed, place the

stop between the cylinder head and piston instead (Figure 6-7).

Figure 6-7. Hard Stop Placed Between Cylinder Head and Piston Through Valve Pocket

Once the positive stop mechanism is installed manually, rotate the crankshaft around in the clockwise

direction until the piston end comes in contact with the stop. Mark this position (to a reference) on the

flywheel. Rotate the crankshaft in the counterclockwise direction until the piston end comes in contact

with the stop. Mark this position on the flywheel. Using highly accurate measurement devices,

determine the middle between the two marks (Figure 6-8). This is the location of ODC.

Synchronization

There are several methods that can be used for synchronizing the encoder with the location of ODC. One

method is to drill a hole or install a pin at the location of ODC on the flywheel. A magnetic pick-up can

then be used to detect ODC and synchronize the ODC reference with the encoder. Synchronization can

also be achieved by using a strobo-scope to detect the ODC location. This requires a special strobo-scope

that is linked to the encoder. The scope will have buttons on it that will allow the operator to vary the

timing of the scope such that it will flash when ODC passes by. This scopes link to the encoder software

will send a signal to change the ODC reference point for the encoder to the timing of the flash set by the

operator.

6.5.4 Accuracy Achieved in Practice

If ODC is determined correctly, then the accuracy of the positional measurement will be directly related

to the resolution of the encoder. If a 360 encoder is used, then the resolution will be 1 degree or 0.3%.

Higher resolution can be achieved with higher count encoders if the ODC is determined correctly and

synchronization is completed accurately. One must weigh the advantages and cost of using a higher

resolution encoder.

If ODC is not determined correctly, then the accuracy of the positional measurement will be related to the

estimated error in ODC, the resolution of the encoder, and synchronization. Regardless of the method

used, ODC determination should be repeated at least once in order to verify that the first marking was

correct. A 1-3 deg error in the positional measurement can lead to 3-5% error in the calculated power

from the PV diagram. This is a significant error and indicates the high importance of correctly

determining ODC.

On reciprocating compressors that have six or more throws, wind-up along the shaft may introduce error

to ODC reference. ODC is marked when the compressor is in a static position. During operation, the

loads on the compressor pistons cause the shaft to deflect torsionally, which produces the wind-up. The

further away the throw is from the ODC reference cylinder, the greater the wind-up may be. This error is

approximately a maximum of 2 degrees for a six-throw machine. Therefore, wind-up should only be a

concern if the compressor has six or more throws.

7. TEST UNCERTAINTY

Test uncertainty must be calculated to determine the accuracy or quality of the test and the bounds of any

measured quantity. Without doing this, the tester cannot be sure if the results are valid or within an

acceptable range. The effects of the uncertainty of instrumentation, data acquisition, installation,

steadiness of operation, and calculations of performance parameters must be considered. There are two

primary components to uncertainty of any physical measurement: random (precision) uncertainty and bias

(fixed) uncertainty. A larger test uncertainty could increase the risk of failing the test, if the compressor

is actually performing better than the acceptance level, and could reduce the risk of failing if the

compressor is performing below the acceptance level.

Test uncertainties need to be clearly distinguished from machine building tolerances. Building tolerances

cover the inevitable manufacturing variance and the subsequent variation in performance predictions.

The actual machine that is installed on the test stand will differ in its actual performance from the

predicted performance by the machine building tolerances. Building tolerances are entirely the

responsibility of the manufacturer and must be excluded in any uncertainty calculation. In addition, the

test uncertainty is not equivalent to the contractual test tolerance. The contractually agreed upon test

tolerance might be influenced by consideration of how accurate a test can be performed or by more

commercial considerations, such as the amount of risk the parties are willing to accept.

Because it is normal practice to use a lower performance than predicted as an acceptance criterion, it is in

the interest of the manufacturer, as well as the user, to test as accurately as possible. The following

definitions should be applied to the discussion of uncertainty:

Precision (Random) Error: The error due to random fluctuations of the measured

quantity. The true value of the measurement should lie within the scatter of the data

points, if no bias error exists. This error is reduced by taking more measurements of the

test quantity.

Bias (Fixed) Error: A systematic deviation of an instruments output from a fixed input.

Bias can be a complex functional form over the instruments operational range, but in

most cases, it is just the consistent over- or under-reading of input data. It is often due to

installation effects or calibration errors. Bias errors must be estimated in the uncertainty

analysis.

Note: In a field site test, the bias error and precision error may not be distinguishable.

These two components of the uncertainty are often treated as a single combined

uncertainty.

Clearly, few physical systems behave linearly over a wide range and, thus, linearity must

always be stated with an upper and lower limit.

the input. Hysteresis has nothing to do with an instruments accuracy degradation over

time. In most cases, it is defined as the maximum difference in instrument reading for a

given input value when the value is approached first with increasing, and then with

decreasing, input signals. Hysteresis is often caused by energy absorption in the elements

of the measuring instrument or system.

All of the above are factors that contribute to, but are fundamentally different than the definition of

measurement uncertainty. Uncertainty does not refer to a single instruments accuracy, but evaluates the

complete range of possible test results given a singular test condition. The field test cannot be performed

with all variables fixed. Consequently, the measured performance calculations and test results must also

be a range rather than a point and must account for all possible input combinations of all input variables.

It is important to understand that if the input ranges to the system are defined as statistical bounds, such as

95% confidence intervals, then the output from the uncertainty analysis will also present the same 95%

confidence interval statistical bounds. Similarly, if the inputs are absolute errors of measurements, then

the uncertainty analysis will also yield absolute errors (i.e., whatever is the type of uncertainty range for

the input variables will be the type of uncertainty range for the result). Consistent application and

definitions of the input variables uncertainty ranges is, thus, critically important in any uncertainty

analysis.

Furthermore, prior to determining a test uncertainty, it is important to know whether the measured

variables in the test are independent or dependent, as this determines the method of uncertainty

calculation that must be employed. For almost all real measurement scenarios, there is some physical

dependency between the input variables and, thus, unless one is absolutely certain that all measured and

given system inputs are independent; it is safer to opt for the more conservative assumption of

measurement dependence. Thus, as the determination whether an experiments measured variables are

interdependent directly establishes the uncertainty analysis method that must be employed, a thorough

physical understanding of the measured system is imperative.

The test uncertainty calculation should be performed using one of the three methods described in

Appendix E. To evaluate the test data, the uncertainty of the test must be calculated correctly, and the

required uncertainty limits must be understood prior to the test. For example, data with an uncertainty of

3.0% cannot yield conclusions requiring an accuracy of 1.0% and, thus, if 1% accuracy is required, the

test preparation, instrumentation, and planning must reflect this requirement. In addition, if a

measurement of pressure is made with a value of 100 psi and an uncertainty of 3%, then the pressure

measurement will actually be in the range of 97 to 103 psi. Also, in comparing the field test data to any

other set of data of the same machine (such as historical data or the factory test data), the uncertainties in

both tests must be considered in the comparison.

If an uncertainty analysis is performed before testing begins, it could be useful in determining what the

most influential test parameters are. The determination of influential test parameters should be used to

assess the measurement parameters in order to improve the accuracy of the field test. The terms in the

total uncertainty equation can be compared at different operating conditions. If the comparison reveals

that a certain term becomes more significant to the overall uncertainty, then extra efforts to improve this

measurement will be worthwhile.

The test uncertainty tolerances are recommended in Table 7-1 for the primary measurement parameters in

the performance test. This table was assembled from current practices, recommendations from industry

experts, and what type of instrumentation is commercially available.

Pressure 0.3 1.0% Full Scale

Temperature 0.5 7.0 F

Flow 0.5 2.0% of value

Gas composition

(Density, compressibility, gas constant, 0.2 3.0% of value

specific heat, energy content)

Piston Position (encoder) 0.1 0.3% of 360 degrees

For all parameters derived from an EOS (such as compressibility, heating value, isentropic coefficient,

density, specific heat, and gas constants), there is an added inherent uncertainty, since the EOS is an

empirical model. Unless direct experimental data for comparison is available for the gas composition

used in the performance test, it is difficult to quantify the added EOS model uncertainty. However, a

consistent application of the selected EOS between the factory test, field test, and predictions will

minimize any potential performance analysis differences and, thus, reduce the contribution of the EOS

model uncertainty to a negligible contribution.

The effect of typical near ideal measurement uncertainties on the total compressor uncertainty for both

the PV Card and Enthalpy Rise method is provided in Section 7.1. Non-ideal installation effects on

uncertainty are provided in Section 7.2 below.

In an ideal field installation, the uncertainty in measured power and efficiency for the reciprocating

compressor is at a minimum. Departures from the ideal installation will increase these uncertainties.

Uncertainties should be calculated using the methods described in Appendix E and instrument uncertainty

values listed in the preceding sections.

This section describes an example of a near ideal field test installation and provides a typical baseline

uncertainty in power and efficiency for this case. The effects of non-ideal measurement conditions on the

total performance uncertainties are discussed and compared in Section 7.2. In the example, uncertainty

calculations given in Sections 7.1 and in the non-ideal installations shown in Section 7.2, the perturbation

method was used to determine the total performance uncertainty, as described in Appendix E.

7.1.1 Compressor Uncertainty Examples

The validity of a compressor performance field test depends on the level of uncertainty of measured

efficiency and power. Also, the test uncertainty can be used to determine if the test is worthwhile. If the

test uncertainty bands cross over the theoretical predictions of compressor performance power, then the

test cannot prove or disprove the theoretical predictions. The theoretical predictions would then provide

adequate information on the performance of the compressor. Figure 7-1 shows two examples: one where

the test would not provide worthwhile data due to high uncertainty (left side) and one with an uncertainty

which provides useful test data (right side). Power and efficiency uncertainties should be calculated from

the individual measurement uncertainties (temperature, pressure, piston position, flow rate, and gas

properties). Below are examples of the PV Card and Enthalpy Rise methods uncertainty analyses.

Uncertainty Ellipse Uncertainty Ellipse

Uncertainty Bands Uncertainty Bands

Theoretical Theoretical

Performance Performance

BHP

BHP

Curve Curve

ps ps

Figure 7-1. Comparison of Tests with Different Levels of Uncertainty

PV Card Method

An example of uncertainty calculation of a performance test conducted using the PV Card method is

described below. This was conducted on a medium speed unit with air being compressed. The pressure

transducer was installed on the head end of the cylinder with the transducer flush-mounted. The

compressor was run at various speeds from 450-900 RPM. The test data analyzed below is for the

450 RPM test.

Table 7-2 details the geometry of the compressor. The uncertainty of the clearance was assumed to be

1%. This is considered to be a best case scenario. There is an uncertainty associated with the clearance

volume regardless if it is from manufacturer literature, measured, or an effective clearance. An isentropic

constant for air was assumed to be 1.4. This is a standard value at 14.7 psia and 60F. An uncertainty of

0.01% was assumed for this value based on expected uncertainties in suction temperature and pressure

and gas composition measurements in field performance tests at steady state. Figure 7-2 shows the actual

PV diagram plotted with the theoretical PV diagram for 450 RPM and a suction pressure of 35 psia.

Component Value

Bore Diameter (in) 7.5

Stroke (in) 6

Rod Diameter (in) 2.25

Rod Length (in) 14.5

Clearance (%) 17.83

The data from the test was evaluated for its uncertainty related to clearance volume measurement,

isentropic constant calculation (from EOS with suction pressure, suction temperature, and gas

composition measurements), piston position, and cylinder pressure. The results for each variable are

shown in Table 7-3. The total resulting uncertainty from the performance test at 450 RPM was 2.03% for

power and 2.06% for efficiency. As shown in Table 7-3, the main influential values on the uncertainty

are the pressure and cylinder position measurements. These measurements should be targeted to have the

lowest uncertainty allowable based on budgetary, field testing, and installation constraints.

100

Measured

Theoretical

90

80

Pressure (psia)

70

60

50

40

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

Volume (in^3)

Figure 7-2. Actual and Theoretical PV Diagrams for Performance Test at 450 RPM

Variable Power Efficiency

Variable Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty

(+/- %) (+/- %) (+/- %)

Clearance Volume 1 0 0.007

Isentropic Constant (Suction

Temperature and Pressure & 0.01 0 0.02

Gas Composition)

Piston Position 0.2 1.09 1.1

Cylinder Pressure 0.25 1.71 1.74

Total Uncertainty 2.03 2.06

An example uncertainty calculation for a reciprocating compressor test using the Enthalpy Rise method is

given in Table 7-4. The values of the measured variables shown in Table 7-4 represent a typical

reciprocating compressor application in pipeline (low compression ratio) service. Operating conditions

are shown in Table 7-4. A representative gas composition was used to compute the gas properties,

consisting of the following components:

5.37% ethane 0.09% n-pentane

1.7% propane 0.07% n-hexane

0.274% isobutene 1.06% carbon dioxide

0.331% n-butane 1.05% nitrogen

The Benedict-Webb-Rubin (BWR) EOS model was used to compute the compressibility, specific heat,

and molecular weight.

Table 7-4. Example of Total Uncertainty Calculation for Compressor in "Near Ideal" Case

Input

Input Parameter Value Power

(%)3

Measured properties:

ps (psia) 159.5 0.3 26.11 0.006

Ts (deg F) 80.3 0.1 73.98 0.005

pd (psia) 224.8 0.3 26.18 0.006

Td (deg F) 152.3 0.1 65.44 0.005

3 1

Q (ft /min) 19345 0.5 43.52 0.000

Calculated properties based on gas composition at suction conditions

2

Z 0.9763 0.05 4.36 0.000

cp (Btu/lbm-deg F) 0.52 0.3 26.11 0.000

K 1.31 0.08 0 0.003

R (Btu/lbm-deg F) 0.11 0.3 26.11 0.000

Value

Parameter (%) (%)

Pcomp (HP) 8703

1.35 1.81

Efficiency, isen (%) 0.636

1

Q is actual flow rate at suction conditions, v = 3937 ft/min in a 30" diameter pipe.

2

Z, cp, k, and R represent a typical hydrocarbon transmission grade gas.

3

Typical values of uncertainty represent ideal pressure and temperature

measurement using four sensors on suction and discharge, recommended flow

meter installation and gas property calculation made with consistent EOS model and

accurate gas sample.

The measurement uncertainties calculated in Table 7-4 assume near-ideal test conditions, procedures, and

efficiencies. These uncertainties are based on proper installation, application, and acquisition of the test

instrumentation, as recommended previously. The calculated property uncertainties (Z, cp, k, R) are

based on typical variations in a sampled gas composition due to sample variation and uncertainty

introduced by the gas sampling process ( = +0.3% for methane and ethane, = +0.1% for propane,

= -0.3% for carbon dioxide, = -0.4% for nitrogen). The calculated property uncertainties include the

uncertainty due to gas chromatograph analysis for a calibrated gas chromatograph.

Based on all the input uncertainties, the resulting uncertainty in compressor power is 1.35%. The

resulting uncertainty in compressor efficiency is 1.81%. These values of measurement uncertainty for the

compressor are close to the minimum attainable test uncertainty for this case.

Deviations in the ideal test conditions or procedures (as recommended previously) will increase the

individual measurement uncertainties and result in a higher total performance measurement uncertainty

for the compressor. Depending upon the effect of the non-ideal installation on the measurement, the

resulting increase in uncertainty can range from a small increase of 0.20% in some cases to above 5.0%.

This uncertainty can affect the measured accuracy of the efficiency and the power. Some typical non-

ideal effects are instrumentation uncertainty, channel resonance and attenuation, heat losses, and the

pulsating flow field. Table 7-5 details some of the non-ideal uncertainties experienced with

instrumentation installations. The majority of these uncertainties are targeted for the Enthalpy Rise

method, but some can also be used with the PV Card method such as use of thermocouple instead of RTD

and error in gas sampling.

Deviation

Deviation

Total from

Non-Ideal Installation Total (%) from

Power (%) Baseline

Baseline

power

Single elbow 1 to 3 pipe diameters

upstream of flow measurement point (no 1.73 0.38 1.81 0

flow conditioner)

Double elbow in-plane, second elbow 1 to

3 pipe diameters upstream of flow 1.95 0.6 1.81 0

measurement point (no flow conditioner)

Double elbow out of plane, second elbow

1 to 3 pipe diameters upstream of flow 2.79 1.44 1.81 0

measurement point (no flow conditioner)

Partially closed gate or ball valve within 1

to 3 pipe diameters upstream of flow 3.72 2.37 1.81 0

measurement point (no flow conditioner)

Single elbow within 1 to 3 pipe diameters

2.39 1.04 2.85 1.04

of temperature and pressure sensors

Double elbows in-plane, second elbow

within 1 to 3 pipe diameters of 3.19 1.84 3.66 1.85

temperature and pressure sensors

Double elbows out of plane, second elbow

within 1 to 3 pipe diameters of 4.84 3.49 5.37 3.56

temperature and pressure sensors

RTD not fully inserted into flow stream 2.37 1.02 2.66 0.85

Use of thermocouple instead of RTD 3.15 1.8 3.38 1.57

Error in gas sampling (no pigtail used)

1.38 0.03 2.01 0.2

with heavy hydrocarbons

*Note: This table assumes that the measurements are taken outside of the bottles with a minimal pulsating

flow (less than 2-3%). If measurements are taken in a pulsating flow, then additional uncertainty should

be added.

Table 7-6 details the increase in performance uncertainty using an encoder and cylinder pressure

measurement with the PV Card method. There are many factors that play into the accuracy of an encoder.

Outer dead center (ODC) must be determined and synchronized correctly in the data acquisition system to

yield accurate results. Also, misalignment with a mechanical drive will introduce high error, as the

instantaneous angular velocity of the encoder can be significantly affected. Every effort should be made

to ensure that the encoder rotation is representative of the compressor rotation. Encoders can be installed

and calibrated to achieve accuracies of 1 degree. As shown in Table 7-6, a near-ideal uncertainty of

0.28% yields an overall uncertainty in power and efficiency of 1.54% and 1.57%, respectively.

installation. The installation of the dynamic pressure sensor should be designed to avoid channel

resonance and attenuation. Channel resonance is a function of the geometry of the port (diameter and

length of the channel). It occurs due to an excitation of the quarter-wave acoustic length resonance of the

gas passage between the cylinder interior and the pressure transducer. The channel resonance and

attenuation error is not related to the machines efficiency, but the effect is a common phenomenon with

high-speed compressors. Channel attenuation can cause errors in the actual power calculation up to 40%.

High errors will be seen in high speed units with heavy gases such as propane or CO2 and long, small

diameter indicator passages. The measured ICHP is not normally affected by pure channel resonance

since it is a sinusoidal phenomenon.

Variable Power Efficiency

Variable Uncertainty Uncertainty Uncertainty

(+/- %) (+/- %) (+/- %)

0.28 1.54 1.57

Encoder 0.42 2.33 2.38

0.56 3.11 3.21

0.25 1.71 1.74

Cylinder 0.50 3.42 3.54

Pressure 1.00 6.84 7.34

1.50 10.25 11.43

If channel resonance is present, it can be removed by filtering techniques. However, the user is cautioned

in doing this. If the data is not properly filtered, the calculated power and efficiencies will be incorrect.

There is also uncertainty associated with temperature measurements. This effect manifests itself in the

theoretical PV diagram construction. This calculation is based on EOS results. It is difficult to

summarize the effects of EOS on uncertainty. If the proper EOS is utilized consistently throughout the

performance test, the uncertainty of the theoretical ICHP will mainly be due to the uncertainties in the

temperature, pressure, gas composition, and piston position measurements. If the test is conducted at

steady state, the effect on the variation of the theoretical power and efficiency will be minimal (less than

0.01%). This uncertainty only needs to be considered if the test has highly fluctuating conditions.

A large number of reciprocating compressors utilize some type of cylinder cooling system. This is true

on high-speed and low-speed compressors. Removing heat from the compressor cylinder is essentially

removing some of the energy applied by the compressor to the gas. This heat removed needs to be

considered when determining an isentropic efficiency. If it is not accounted for, the calculated isentropic

efficiency will be optimistic. The cylinder cooling effects are already included in the measured PV

diagram. This is due to the fact that the work applied to the gas is directly measured. Equation 4-4 shows

how the heat removal is included in the Enthalpy Rise method calculation. The uncertainty of the heat

losses estimations directly affects the uncertainty of the total power measurement and efficiency in the

Enthalpy Rise method. Care should be taken to obtain an accurate estimate for heat removed from the

compressor cylinders.

Pulsations are always present in a reciprocating compressor. It is important to understand their effects in

order to account for their influence during performance test. The capacity of the compressor can be

calculated from a PV diagram, but sometimes the capacity is measured. Flow measurement is highly

influenced by pulsations. A flow meter must be installed in an area of low pulsations (much less than

10% and preferably under 2%) in order to obtain a valid reading. This must be outside the suction or

discharge pulsation bottles in virtually all cases. Beyond the flow measurement, the pressure and

temperature measurement can be affected by large pulsations and introduce higher than 3% uncertainties.

Pulsations can also have a direct effect on both the actual and the calculated power and efficiency. While

the suction and discharge valves are open, the acoustic pulsation present in the system is reflected into the

compressor cylinder. Should the pulsation levels be of sufficient amplitude, the valve opening and

closing times can be affected, and the average inlet and/or discharge pressures of the cylinder can be

different than the design pressures, the net result being horsepower and capacity values which are

different than the design values. These values may be greater or smaller, depending on the pulsation

characteristics.

Variations of operating conditions during testing will affect the uncertainty of the performance

measurements and calculations. The requirements for test stability were shown in Table 5-1 through

Table 5-3. If the measured and calculated values deviate outside these ranges, then the uncertainty of the

test will increase. Every effort should be taken to ensure that test stability is achieved. If this is not

possible, then the uncertainty of the deviations must be considered in the test results.

Test points taken at different points in time should not be averaged. If this is done, the non-linear effects

will not be averaged correctly. Instead, the performance parameter should be calculated for each data

point. The resulting parameters can then be averaged. Data reduction procedures should be aimed at

minimizing time and cost in the determination of performance.

If the test data from the field test deviates more than the level of test uncertainty, the source of the

deviation should be explored further. For example, two test points, which were taken at the same

condition, may show vastly different calculated flows. Further investigation may reveal that a clearance

volume pocket was open at one test point, but not the other. Repeating the performance test is not

recommended by this guideline unless the data is clearly un-usable. It is advised to have a performance

calculation program set-up in the field such that the results can be calculated automatically. Any

significant deviations in the data can be investigated in the field. Then it will be quick and easy to repeat

tests as necessary. The results should be monitored throughout the test.

For the reciprocating compressor, there are many ways to determine what could possibly influence the

test results. For the PV Card method, the structure of the PV diagram can indicate whether there are leaks

in the valves or seals. Also, if a shift is seen in the compression and expansion lines of the PV diagram,

the gas composition may have not been stable during the test. Compressor performance diagnostics with

PV diagrams is discussed in more detail in Appendix F. Effects such as suction valve leakage, discharge

valve leakage, piston ring leakage, pulsation effects, and valve and cylinder gas passage losses can be

identified with the geometry of the diagram.

For the Enthalpy Rise method, if the enthalpy difference versus flow curve has shifted horizontally, the

flow may have been measured incorrectly or contain a bias error. If some of the points on the curve

match predictions and others do not, the gas composition (or another influential parameter) may not have

been stable during the test.

There are many different objectives to performance tests. A company may be conducting a manufacturer

verification performance test or they may be generating a set of performance curves for the operational

control of the system. Each data point recorded during the field test should be evaluated individually.

The average of all data points at a particular condition should be used to compute the average power,

enthalpy difference, flow, and efficiency. This should only be done after the results have been calculated

for each data point.

For a manufacturer performance verification test, these final data point averages should be compared to

the performance curves for the compressor. The performance curves are provided by the manufacturer of

the compressor. There are multiple performance curves that can be supplied with the compressor. Some

of these include: BHP/MMSCFD verses suction pressure, discharge pressure or pressure ratio, capacity

verses suction pressure, discharge pressure or pressure ratio, and discharge pressure verses suction

pressure. The performance results can be compared to the various curves depending upon what

parameters were measured during the performance test. When comparing the measured data points to the

manufacturer stated performance, the uncertainty must be considered.

If the performance test is conducted in order to characterize the performance of the compressor at various

conditions and development of curves, each individual point should still be evaluated individually and

then averaged. The developed curves should include uncertainty curves. The uncertainty curves will

provide the user with the range of possible values for the plotted values. An example of a compressor

performance curve is shown below in Figure 8-1 for a high-speed transmission compressor.

2600

2400

2200

Driver HP

2000

Power (BHP)

1800

Step 1

1600

Step 2

1400

Step 3

Step 4

Step 5

1200

1000

800

250

200 Step 1

Step 2

Flow (MMSCFD)

150 Step 3

Step 4

Step 5

100

Reg Flow

50

0

500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900

Ps (psig)

High-Speed Transmission Compressor

8.3 Using Redundancy to Check Test Measurement and Uncertainty

Redundant calculations should be performed, if possible, to check test measurements. The compressor

driver power may be measured as discussed in previous sections. The shaft power output (or engine

BHP) from the engine can be calculated with the fuel flow, lower heating value of the fuel, and efficiency

of the engine. The compressor BHP measured during the field test should match the engine BHP.

If the flow rate is measured during the performance test, this can be compared to the capacity calculated

from the volumetric efficiencies measured. There may be some variation in these numbers due to the

uncertainty associated with each type of measurement, but the values should be fairly close.

The calculated values, or if available factory test (manufacturer supplied) values, should match the

measured values within the associated uncertainty for both values. The uncertainty on any measured

value obtained in the field test should be calculated (or estimated as accurately as possible). This

uncertainty will be a plus or minus value. It should overlap with the uncertainty band (also a plus or

minus) on the calculated/factory test value. This analysis will determine if the redundant measurement is

statistically equal to the measured value. This method of comparison should always be used in order to

practically determine if measured values are correct. A graphical example of this is shown in Figure 8-2.

Uncertainty Ellipse

Theoretical Prediction

Uncertainty Bands

BHP

BHP

BHP

Theoretical

Performance Curve

ps ps ps

Equal Equal Statistically Equal

Figure 8-2. Comparison of Theoretical Predicted Performance

and Measured Performance Test Point

The true value of the compressor performance parameters (capacity, efficiency, and power) lies within the

measured data points, assuming the data has been recorded correctly without a significant bias error. The

measured data points should be viewed as a representation of the bracket surrounding the true value. If

two measured parameter data points are plotted on a horizontal- and vertical-axis, an uncertainty band on

each measured variable exists. An ellipse surrounds the measured data point (see Figure 8-3). The

predicted performance test point, or manufacturer factory test curve, may lie within the uncertainty band

produced from the field test, though the exact values from the field test do not exactly match the

manufacturer suggested curve. This example (shown in Figure 8-3) shows good performance of the

compressor during the field test. The compressor performance in the field test is statistically equal to the

factory test in this example.

Test Points and

Respective Uncertainty

Ellipse

Performance

Curves

BHP

ps

Figure 8-3. Example of Test Uncertainty Range

9. REFERENCES

2. API 618, Reciprocating Compressors for Petroleum, Chemical and Gas Industry Services, 1995.

3. Deffenbaugh, D. M., Smalley, A. J., Harris, R. E., Brun, K., Moore, J. J., McKee, R. J., et al.,

Advanced Reciprocating Compression Technology, Southwest Research Institute Final Report

for DOE-NETL, December 2005.

4. ASME PTC 10, Performance Test Code on Compressors and Exhausters, 1997.

5. ASME PTC 19.1, Measurement Uncertainties, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New

York, New York, 1985.

6. Boutin, B. and Webber, B., Basic Reciprocating Engine and Compressor Analysis Techniques,

Proceedings of the Gas Machinery Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 2004.

7. Brun, K. and Nored, M. G., Guideline for Field Testing of Gas Turbine and Centrifugal

Compressor Performance, Gas Machinery Research Council, August 2006.

8. Casey, M.V., Fesich, T.M., On the Efficiency of Compressors with Diabatic Flows, GT2009-

59015, Proceedings of ASME TurboExpo 2009: Power for Land, Sea and Air, Orlando, FL, 2009.

9. Durke, R. G. and McKee, R. J., Orifice Meter Gage Line Distortions, Southwest Research

Institute.

10. Edmister, W. C. and Lee, B. I., Applied Hydrocarbon Thermodynamics Volume 1, Second

Edition, Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, Texas, 1984.

11. Ely, C. and Messick, T., Performance Measures for Gas Compression and Transportation,

Proceedings of Gas Machinery Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2003.

12. Field Measurement Guidelines Compressor Cylinder Performance Summary, GMRC Technical

Report No. 84-10a, May 1984.

13. Gehri, C. and Harris, R. E., Technology for the Design and Evaluation of High-Speed

Reciprocating Compressor Installations, Proceedings of the European Forum for Reciprocating

Compressors, Dresden, Germany, November 1999.

14. Harris, R., E. and Edlund, C., Performance Measurements of High Speed/High Ratio

Reciprocating Compressors, GMRC, 1998.

15. Howard, B., Channel Resonance in Reciprocating Compressor Cylinder Pressure Measurements,

GE Energy, 2006.

16. IEEE 515, Standard for the Testing, Design, Installation, and Maintenance of Electrical Resistance

Heat Tracing for Industrial Applications, 2004.

17. ISO 1217, Displacement Compressors Acceptance Test, 1996.

18. ISO 5167, Measurement of Fluid Flow by Means of Pressure Differential Devices Inserted in

Circular Cross-Section Conduits Running Full, 2003.

19. Kumar, S. K., Kurz, R., and OConnell, J. P. Equations of State for Compressor Design and

Testing, ASME Paper No. 99-GT-12, 1999.

20. Kurz, R. and Brun, K. Site Performance Test Evaluation for Gas Turbine and Electric Motor

Driven Compressors, Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Turbomachinery Symposium, Houston,

Texas, 2005.

21. Kurz, R. and Brun, K. Degradation in Gas Turbine Systems, Journal of Engineering for Gas

Turbines and Power, Transactions of the ASME, Vol. 123, pp. 70-77, January 2001.

22. Kurz, R. and Brun, K., Efficiency Definition and Load Management for Reciprocation and

Centrifugal Compressors, Proceedings of 6th Conference of the EFRC, Dusseldorf, Germany,

October 2008.

23. Mathews, H., Compressor Performance Analysis, Proceedings of Gas Machinery Conference,

2000.

24. McKee, R. J., Pulsation Mitigation in Gas Flow Measurement, Southwest Research Institute.

25. Moffat, R., Describing the Uncertainties in Experimental Results, Experimental Thermal and

Fluid Science, Vol. 1, 13-17, 1988.

26. Nimitz, W., Evaluation and Optimization of Reciprocating Compressor Performance,

Proceedings of the AGA Transmission/Distribution Conference, 1985.

27. Ransom, D., Brun, K., and Kurz, R., Enthalpy Determination Methods for Compressor

Performance Calculations, Proceedings of ASME TurboExpo, Montreal, Canada, 2007.

28. Sandberg, M. R. Equation of State Influences on Compressor Performance Determination,

Proceedings of the 34th Turbomachinery Symposium, Houston, Texas, 2005.

29. Schultheis, S., Lickteig, C., and Parchewsky, R., Reciprocating Compressor Condition

Monitoring, Proceedings of the 36th Turbomachinery Symposium, 2007.

30. Smalley, A., Lagus, P., Kothari, K., Wang, J., and Clowney, S., Reciprocating Compressor Flow

by Tracer Dilution and Cylinder Pressure Measurement, Proceedings of the International Gas

Research Conference, 1992.

31. Soave, G., Equilibrium Constants from a Modified Redlich-Kwong Equation of State, Chemical

Engineering Science, Vol. 27, Issue 6, 1972.

This page is intentionally left blank.

APPENDIX A

This page is intentionally left blank.

APPENDIX A

This section outlines the steps that should be followed to complete a reciprocating compressor

performance test. Differences in the PV Card and Enthalpy Rise method will be noted in the appropriate

steps. References to certain sections of the guideline (that provide more details) will be in parentheses.

2. Develop Field Test Agenda (Section 5)

a. Select calculation methodology

i. Chose method of data reduction: PV Card or Enthalpy Rise method (Section 4)

ii. Select EOS of state for all calculations (Section 3.7 and Appendix C)

iii. Select approach for determining uncertainty (Section 7 and Appendix E)

iv. Set test results acceptance criteria (specified in terms of maximum uncertainty

allowed)

b. Review site specific details

i. Review field conditions and equipment, pipe, and station layout

ii. Determine if any deviation from normal operation may be necessary to achieve

test objectives

iii. Identify operating conditions and operational limits of compressor including

pressure, temperature and flow limits of facility

1. Obtain manufacturer performance curves for compressor

2. Review capacity control and load steps of compressor

3. Determine operation matrix for testing based on typical operating

conditions and test objectives

a. If possible test guarantee points and then additional desired

points

iv. Review test safety considerations (Section 5.6)

v. Select instruments to be used, their location, method of operation, calibration,

requirements for installation (Sections 4 and 6)

1. Determine how these instruments will be installed with existing

instrumentation

3. Pre-test meeting: Meeting between test engineer, customer, and all parties involved to discuss the

details of the test (Section 5.1)

a. Review field test agenda

b. Agreement should be reached on

i. Test objectives

ii. Test procedures

iii. Safety requirements

iv. Responsibilities during test

v. Availability of necessary operating conditions

1. Review contractual guarantee points and what operating conditions they

could be reached at

2. If cannot operate at guarantee points then consult with manufacturer to

determine alternate guarantee points

vi. Acceptance conditions

4. Pre-test operation and instrumentation check-out (Section 5.2)

a. Unit preparation

i. Have operator take the unit offline if it is running

1. If unit cannot be taken offline all items below except e can be completed

with the unit online. The unit must be shutdown in order to complete

ODC determination.

ii. Blow down the unit

iii. Lockout Tagout the unit

b. Verify compressor is in good mechanical condition (complete a mechanical assessment)

and conduct appropriate maintenance

c. If driver performance will be measured during the test, verify the mechanical condition of

the driver and conduct appropriate maintenance

d. Instrumentation (Section 6)

i. Calibrate instruments in the range which they will operate in

ii. Install instruments

1. Check insertion depth of thermowells.

2. Verify that thermowells are service with appropriate oil or heat transfer

material

3. If large area of thermowell is exposed, insulate this area

4. Where pressure taps involve tubing runs, the tubing should be checked

for leaks.

iii. Check all instrument readings to assure that they are functioning properly

iv. Verify data acquisition system (DAQ) operation prior to starting the test

e. ODC Determination (Section 6.5)

i. Prepare compressor for ODC determination

1. Before starting ODC determination open all indicator valves on

compressor cylinders and power cylinders to relive any excess gas

ii. Complete ODC determination with selected method (two methodologies

described in Section 6.5)

iii. Repeat ODC determination for verification

iv. Synchronize encoder with ODC position

f. Check fixed clearance (Section 5.2 and Section 4.1.3)

i. Compare the calculated clearance from the PV analyzer to the manufacturer

stated clearance. Take into considerations what capacity control devices are

being used (ex. valve unloaders, clearance pockets). If these values are within 1

to 2% of the manufactures stated fixed or variable clearances then the

manufacturer clearance can be used for the performance test. If they are not

close then further investigation should be conducted to determine what is causing

the variability or the fixed clearance should be measured.

g. Ensure sufficient gas is available for the anticipated flow and operating conditions of the

test

h. If the test is going to be conducted on a closed loop, check if gas cooling is available and

if recirculation of gas is an option during field test. Notify all parties of time frame for

test.

i. Determine how load steps will be maintained constant during a test point and how they

will be changed for different test points.

j. Identify and document what orifice plates are installed

k. Check the position of the recycle or bypass valve. Both of these values should be in

operable conditions and not leak when closed.

l. Check if in line strainers are plugged or not

5. Testing

a. Start compressor and allow system to reach thermal equilibrium (at least 30 minutes for

the compressor)

b. Adjust compressor to reach desired operating conditions for first test point on test matrix.

c. If using the PV Card method, verify that PV diagram is as expected and that no channel

resonance or attenuation is present. (Section 4.1)

d. Estimate the amount of time required to collect all data during a test. Assure that

compressor is stable over this amount of time before each test (Section 5.5, Table 5-2)

e. Capture test data by obtaining an average of several data points over a short time span.

i. The test data should not fluctuate more than the requirements listed in the

guideline (Table 5-1 through Table 5-3).

ii. If the test data variations does not fall within the limits specified in the guideline

perform the test again once the compressor is stable

iii. If the test data variations do not fall within the limits after several attempts then

take the test data as is. An additional uncertainty should be added to the results

due to the instability of the test. (Section 5.5.3)

f. Measure surface temperature of bottles and pipe for heat loss estimations during each test

(Appendix H)

g. Record wind speed (only on units not housed in a building), ambient temperature, and

ambient pressure once during each test if not measure continuously and recorded by

DAQ system

h. Repeat steps b through g for all test points in test matrix

i. After all tests are complete, ensure that all data has been captured and stored in the test

computer

6. Post-test operation

a. Have operator shut compressor down

b. Bleed gas pressure out of compressor

c. Remove all instrumentation and return compressor back to original condition (pre-test

condition)

7. Test Data Processing

a. Retrieve test data from test computer

b. Process data to calculated desired performance parameters in accordance with the data

reduction method and EOS selected prior to testing (Section 3, Section 4, Section 8,

Appendix B, Appendix C, Appendix H)

i. Determine compressor efficiency and power at each test point (Section 3.2,

Section 3.3, and Appendix B)

ii. Calculate heat losses for each test point when using the Enthalpy Rise method

(Appendix H)

c. Calculate uncertainty for each test parameter (Section 7 and Appendix E)

d. Plot test data and uncertainty ellipse with manufacturer performance curves. (Section 8)

e. Document details of test including operation conditions tested, compressor configuration,

test data and results and uncertainty in a test report

This page is intentionally left blank.

APPENDIX B

This page is intentionally left blank.

APPENDIX B

The following are two general procedures for construction of the theoretical PV diagram. With this

diagram, the theoretical ICHP can be calculated. This will be used to find the isentropic efficiency of a

compressor cylinder. The first method is the method most commonly used in testing. It is based on ideal

gas relationships for isentropic compression. It should be noted that in natural gas service, assuming ideal

gas relationships is not necessarily correct. The second method is more rigorous and requires the use of

an EOS solver. The EOS solver is used to generate a constant entropy PV diagram without the

assumptions of an ideal gas. This method is perhaps more accurate than the first since it does not assume

ideal gas relationships.

Commercial PV analyzers will automatically calculate the theoretical PV diagram and use it to calculate

the theoretical ICHP. These procedures are presented here for completeness of the guideline.

There are several pieces of information that need to be known before construction of the PV diagram can

begin. These are listed below.

Gas Composition

Absolute Suction Pressure (from toe pressure on PV diagram or measured in nozzle)

Absolute Discharge Pressure (from toe pressure on PV diagram or measured in nozzle)

Suction Temperature (measured in nozzle)

Clearance Volume (or Minimum Volume)

Maximum Volume

The theoretical PV diagram consists of four sides. The left side is an isentropic expansion line, the

bottom a constant suction pressure line, the right side an isentropic compression line, and the top a

constant discharge pressure line.

The items listed below give step-by-step instructions on how to generate the theoretical PV diagram.

a. The isentropic constant calculated from a ratio of specific heats (Equation B-1). The

constant pressure and constant volume specific heats are found using the gas

composition, suction pressure, and suction temperature with an EOS solver. There are

many programs available that can complete this calculation. Also, Equation 3-7 can be

used to calculate this.

cp

k= (B-1)

cv

2. Determine the discharge pressure and minimum volume (clearance volume).

a. This will be the start point of the expansion line and the end point of the constant

discharge pressure line as shown in Figure B-1.

90

pd

80

70

60

Pressure (psia)

50

40

ps

30

20

10

Vmin Vmax

0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

Volume (in^3)

a. This will be the start point of the compression line and the end point of the constant

suction pressure line as shown in Figure B-2.

90

pd

80

70

60

Pressure (psia)

50

40

ps

30

20

10

Vmin Vmax

0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

Volume (in^3)

K1 = pd * Vmin

k

(B-2)

5. Calculate the volume at the suction pressure on the expansion line.

1

K k

Vs = 1

ps (B-3)

6. Calculate several other points on the expansion line using the equation in step 5 and plot the

expansion line (see Figure B-3).

90

pd

80

70

60

Pressure (psia)

50

40

ps

30

20

10

Vmin Vmax

0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

Volume (in^3)

Figure B-3. Theoretical PV Diagram with Multiple Points Plotted on Expansion Line

K 2 = ps * Vmax

k

(B-4)

1

K k

Vd = 2

pd (B-5)

9. Calculate several other points on the compression line using the equation in step 8 and plot the

compression line (see Figure B-4).

90

pd

80

70

60

Pressure (psia)

50

40

ps

30

20

10

Vmin Vmax

0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

Volume (in^3)

10. Connect the expansion and compression lines with the suction and discharge pressure lines (see

Figure B-5).

90

pd

80

70

60

Pressure (psia)

50

40

ps

30

20

10

Vmin Vmax

0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

Volume (in^3)

Constant Entropy with EOS Solver

For the procedure using the EOS Solver and using constant entropy, the parameters obtained for the first

method are also used for this method. This method also requires the use of the discharge temperature.

Gas Composition

Absolute Suction Pressure (from toe pressure on PV diagram or measured in nozzle)

Absolute Discharge Pressure (from toe pressure on PV diagram or measured in nozzle)

Suction Temperature (measured in nozzle)

Discharge Temperature (measured in nozzle)

Clearance Volume (or Minimum Volume)

Maximum Volume

The items listed below give step-by-step instructions on how to generate the theoretical PV diagram.

a. This will be the start point of the expansion line and the end point of the constant

discharge pressure line as shown in Figure B-1.

2. Determine the suction pressure and maximum volume.

a. This will be the start point of the compression line and the end point of the constant

suction pressure line as shown in Figure B-2.

3. Expansion Line

a. Calculate the mass present in the cylinder at the start of the expansion.

i. This can be done by knowing the properties of the gas (calculated with gas

composition and EOS), discharge temperature, discharge pressure, and volume in

the cylinder (clearance volume).

b. Calculate the entropy at discharge temperature and discharge pressure with the EOS.

i. The expansion on the theoretical PV diagram is an isentropic process. This

assumes constant entropy throughout the process.

c. Calculate the end point of the expansion line and plot.

i. This is done by determining the density of the gas with the EOS from the suction

pressure and entropy determined in step 3b.

ii. Use this density to calculate the volume at the suction pressure with the mass

calculated in step 3a.

d. Calculate a few other points along the expansion line with the various densities (calculate

from mass and volume in the cylinder) and the entropy previously determined.

e. Plot these on the graph and complete a curve fit to obtain the full expansion line (see

Figure B-3).

4. Compression Line

a. Complete the same process described above for the expansion line but use the start point

(location for entropy and mass calculation) with the suction pressure and suction

temperature.

b. Use the discharge pressure and start entropy for the end point of the compression line

(see Figure B-4).

5. Connect the expansion and compression lines with the suction and discharge pressure lines (see

Figure B-5).

This page is intentionally left blank.

APPENDIX C

EQUATIONS OF STATE

This page is intentionally left blank.

APPENDIX C

The following explanation of the EOS models is taken from Equations of State for Gas Compressor

Design and Testing by Kumar, Kurz and OConnell, 2003.

While the operating conditions for gas compressors are typically defined in terms of pressures,

temperatures, and mass or standard flows, the relevant data that describe the behavior of a compressor are

the head (H), which is related to the work input, the volumetric flow (Q) and efficiency (), which

compares the real process to an isentropic process between the same inlet state and outlet pressure.

The head, or specific enthalpy difference between two states (e.g., inlet and discharge side of the

compressor), is defined by:

The enthalpy (h) is a function of pressure, temperature, and gas composition defined through a set of mole

fractions {y}. The actual absorbed power (Pgas) involves the mass flow rate ( m ):

Pgas = m H (C-2)

The mass flow rate is obtained from the actual or volumetric flow rate (Q) and the gas density ():

m = Q (C-3)

The density is found from the temperature (T) and pressure (p) with the compressibility factor (Z). When

Z differs from unity, the gas is not ideal and its value is a function of T, p, and gas composition.

= p/ZRT (C-4)

p

Pgas = QH = QH

ZRT (C-5)

In order to define the quality of the compression process, H is usually compared to the head for an ideal

compression process, which is defined as compression between the same inlet Ts and ps and outlet pd, with

the outlet temperature being fictitious Td,isen:

(C-6)

This isentropic change of state defines an isentropic head, Hisen, such that:

(C-7)

The quality or efficiency of the compression is defined by:

H isen

=

H (C-8)

Compressor characteristics, in terms of head versus flow and efficiency versus flow, are found by

comparing test data, taken with test gases such as Nitrogen, with results obtained from the

thermodynamic calculations above. The characteristics can later be used to calculate the performance of

the compressor under arbitrary conditions of pressures, temperatures, and gas compositions. As long as

the same EOS is used for obtaining compressor performance predictions and data reduction, errors are

minimized.

An EOS is a relation among variables of a fully specified system: T, p, and the N-1 component mole

fractions yi (Alberty and Silbey, 1997). This is usually expressed in the form:

Z = Z (, T, {y}) (C-9)

Thermodynamics gives rigorous relations for enthalpy and entropy differences from derivatives and

integrals of Z from any EOS and ideal gas specific heat, c 0p . A gas is said to be in a specified state if it

has zero degrees of freedom. The degrees of freedom are the number of properties that can be arbitrarily

set before all other properties become specified. The formula for the degrees of freedom of N non-

reacting gases is:

DF = N # phases + 2 (C-10)

In gas compressor design calculations, only one phase exists, and the gas composition is usually

specified, so two more degrees of freedom must be chosen. Generally, p and T are specified and the

number of phases is always one. Then, all other thermodynamic properties are fixed and calculated via an

EOS. Since real gas behavior commonly plays a role in gas compressors, knowledge of the relationships

between pressures and temperatures, on one hand, and enthalpies, entropies and densities, on the other

hand, is of great importance in compressor design, their performance under arbitrary operating conditions,

and test data reduction. Especially during gas compressor performance tests, the selection of a particular

EOS can have an important effect on the apparent efficiency and absorbed gas power.

Thermodynamic Approach

In order to decide on the most appropriate (EOS) to be used for designing and testing gas compressors for

natural gas applications, five frequently applied EOS were studied: original Redlich-Kwong, Redlich-

Kwong-Soave, Peng-Robinson (Reid et al., 1986), Lee-Kesler-Ploecker (Ploecker et al., 1978) and

Starling version of the Benedict-Webb-Rubin model (Starling, 1973).

The variation in entropy or enthalpy between two states of a gas or mixture, each defined by a

temperature and pressure, is independent from the path chosen from one state to the other (Reid et al.,

1986). A convenient path involving three steps of changing the real gas to an ideal gas at T1, changing the

ideal gas from T1 to T2 and changing the ideal gas back to the real gas at T2 (Figure C-1).

T2

Isotherms

T1

Pressure

Zero

pressure

Enthalpy

h = f ( p, T )

dh = (h / p )T dp + (h / T ) p dT

p2 T2

h2 h1 = (h / p )T + (h / T ) p DT

p1 T1

( ) ( )

T2

h2 h1 = h 0 h p1 + c 0p dT h 0 h p 2

T1 T2

T1 (C-11)

The terms in the parentheses of Equation C-11 are called departure functions, real gas contributions, or

residual properties, which relate the enthalpy at some p and T to that at an ideal gas reference state at T,

H0. These departure functions can be calculated solely from the EOS. The same approach can be used

for the entropy.

The ideal gas law is based on the assumption that the molecules of the gas do not interact with each other

or that there is no attractive or repulsive forces between two molecules. The heat capacity of a gas is the

amount of energy, which the gas needs to absorb before its temperature increases one unit. For an ideal

gas, the heat capacity c 0p is a function only of T. An empirical equation for the ideal gas heat capacity

can be stated as a polynomial, e.g., third order polynomial:

A, B, C, and D are empirical parameters or constants based on the type of gas being analyzed. Once an

equation for c 0p is found, the ideal gas enthalpy change, which is the change in total energy in the gas as

it goes from state one to state two, can be found by:

T2

h 0 = c p dT

T1 (C-13)

Even for an ideal gas, the entropy change depends upon the initial and final temperatures and pressures.

T2 cp p

s 0 = dT R ln 2

T1 T p1 (C-14)

When calculating the enthalpy or entropy of a given state, an arbitrary reference state must be selected

whose enthalpy and entropy are set to zero. The enthalpy and entropy for a given state is calculated

relative to this reference. Therefore, any absolute value of the enthalpy or entropy of a gas at a given state

has no real meaning, given its dependence on the reference state. However, when the enthalpy difference

between two states is calculated, the reference state cancels out, so an enthalpy or entropy difference is an

actual value that does not depend on the reference state.

The departure functions for enthalpy and entropy for each of the five EOS can be found in the literature

(Reid et al., 1986; Peng and Robinson, 1976; Ploecker et al., 1978; and Starling, 1973). Herein, the RK,

RKS, and PR EOS are referred to as cubics.

In Equation C-15, Z represents the compressibility factor of the gas, defined as:

pv

Z=

RT (C-15)

The quantities X and Y are two other types of compressibility factors used in compressor design. The

formulas for each:

p Z

Y = 1

Z p T

(C-16)

T Z

X=

Z T (C-17)

The calculation of the molecular weight and the heat capacity at given temperatures of the gas mixture is

completed by using the following mixing rules:

~

MW = y i MWi

c~ =

p

yc i pi

(C-18)

MWi and y are the molecular weight and mole fraction of each component in the mixture. The heat

capacities are divided by R to make them dimensionless, so when the linear function is found at a given

temperature, the result should be multiplied by R in the desired units to get the heat capacity in those

units.

The linear function for ideal cp0/R is calculated using the cp0/R values at 10 and 149C (50 and 300F).

These two points are used to find the slope of a straight line on a cp0/R versus temperature plot. This

slope is used to solve for the y intercept of the following simple linear equation:

c 0p

= CT + B

R (C-19)

Finally, the specific gravity (sg) and the real gas parameter (RG) are calculated; sg is calculated relative to

the molecular weight of air:

~

MW

sg =

28.964 (C-20)

0.287 kJ / kgK

RG =

sg (C-21)

The Redlich-Kwong and Peng-Robinson models are cubic equations of state. The LKP equation is like

the BWRS, a modification of the original BWR EOS. The LKP EOS has mixing rules that are very

different from the cubics. The Starling version (BWRS) of the original BWR EOS added three extra

parameters for improving the temperature dependence of the eight parameter forms. These parameters

must be found for each pure gas. There also are mixing rules for the 11 parameters (Starling, 1973).

For the cubic EOS, an analytical method can be used to solve for the three roots of , thus, yielding Z.

There are three roots to any cubic equation; however, when Tr >1 only the largest real root has any

physical significance. After Z is calculated, the X and Y compressibility factors, along with specific heat,

are calculated. For the LKP and BWRS models, Z is found by an iterative method.

This page is intentionally left blank.

APPENDIX D

PERFORMANCE DATA

This page is intentionally left blank.

APPENDIX D

The following comparison of the EOS models relies on results presented in Enthalpy Determination

Methods for Compressor Performance Calculations by David Ransom, Rainer Kurz, and Klaus Brun.

This comparison was completed for centrifugal compressors as described below. However, the

comparison of EOS can be directly applied to reciprocating compressor performance testing.

For this comparison, a matrix of three gas compositions and two pressure ratios are considered. Enthalpy

values are calculated using various EOS models and used to calculate compression power and isentropic

efficiency. The three gas compositions (Table D-1) are intended to represent a variety of typical

compression products including natural gas, high hydrogen, and high diluent compositions. (Note that

gas mixture 1 is the same composition used in the uncertainty analysis in Section 7.) The two pressure

ratios included in this comparison (PR = 1.3 and 2.2) are consistent with typical two- and six-stage

machines, although neither value represents any specific application. In all cases, inlet conditions of

1,000 psia and 80F are assumed. For each analysis configuration (gas mix and pressure ratio), both the

isentropic and actual gas horsepower are determined, followed then by the isentropic efficiency. Gas

power is a function of mass flow (assumed to be measured) and the change in enthalpy of the working

fluid.

Component Mix 1 Mix 2 Mix 3

Methane 90.00 80.00 7.65

Ethane 5.37 5.37 1.06

Propane 1.70 1.70 0.20

Iso-Butane 0.27 0.27 0.00

N-Butane 0.33 0.33 0.00

Iso-Pentane 0.06 0.06 0.00

N-Pentane 0.09 0.09 0.00

Hexane 0.07 0.07 0.00

Carbon Dioxide 1.06 6.06 0.85

Nitrogen 1.05 6.05 3.85

Hydrogen 0.00 0.00 86.34

Hydrogen Suflide 0.00 0.00 0.05

Total 100.00 100.00 100.00

Parameter Mix 1 Mix 2 Mix 3

ps (psia) 1000 1000 1000

Ts (F) 80 80 80

pd (psia) 1295 1295 1295

Td (F) 119 117 127

Table D-3. Assumed Measured Conditions; PR = 2.2

Parameter Mix 1 Mix 2 Mix 3

ps (psia) 1000 1000 1000

Ts (F) 80 80 80

pd (psia) 2200 2200 2200

Td (F) 201 199 235

Five EOS models are included in this comparison: Redlich-Kwong (1948), Redlich-Kwong-Soave

(Soave, 1972), Peng-Robinson (1976), Lee-Kesler-Ploecker (Ploeker et al., 1978), and Benedict-Webb-

Rubin-Starling (Starling, 1973). Using the appropriate EOS, three enthalpy values are determined as

follows: determine the inlet enthalpy (hs) and entropy (ss) as a function of the inlet conditions (ps, Ts);

determine the isentropic discharge enthalpy (hd,isen) as a function of isentropic discharge conditions (pd,

ss); and determine the actual discharge enthalpy (hd) as a function of the actual discharge conditions (pd,

Td). A graphic representation of this process is provided below on a generic T-s diagram (Figure D-1).

Temperature

Entropy

Figure D-1. Compression T-S Diagram

Once these values are determined, it is a very simple calculation to determine the isentropic and actual gas

horsepower values (Equations D-1 and D-2).

P = m (hd hs ) (D-1)

Pisen = m

(hd ,isen hs )

(D-2)

hd ,isen hs

=

hd hs (D-3)

Enthalpy Determination Results

The results for gas horsepower and isentropic efficiency for each of the EOS models are shown in Table

D-4 and Table D-5. For the sake of comparison, the mass flow for Mix 3 (high hydrogen gas) is adjusted

to provide a similar horsepower as the natural gas compositions. Note that results are not shown for

BWRS for the High H2 gas composition (Mix 3) since BWRS does not contain hydrogen data.

These results demonstrate the relative agreement between the five EOS methods applied in this study. At

the lower pressure ratio, for the first two gas mixtures, the standard deviation is about 30 HP, or 1.2% of

the average value. In the case of the high hydrogen gas (Mix 3), the standard deviation is approximately

140 HP, or 1.7% of the average value at the same pressure ratio. For the higher pressure ratio, the

deviation in the first two mixtures between the EOS models is approximately the same as the lower

pressure ratio. The deviation increases to 1.8% at the higher pressure ratio for the high hydrogen gas

(Mix 3). It should also be noted that the Peng-Robinson model consistently predicts slightly lower

horsepower for all three gas mixtures, while the SRK model predicts higher horsepower within the

deviations stated above.

The isentropic efficiencies calculated using the various EOS models show relatively close agreement as

well. However, the standard deviation among the five methods used in this study is as high as 2%, which

can be significant when evaluating compressor performance against the promised performance, usually

specified within 1%. In the extreme case, the isentropic efficiency between one particular EOS model

and another can be as high as 3.8%. These results underscore the importance of applying the same EOS

model throughout the performance analysis.

Table D-4. Horsepower and Efficiency Calculations for EOS Models at Pressure Ratio of 1.3

Mix1 Mix2 Mix3

EOS Model Hp-Act Eff-is Hp-Act Eff-is Hp-Act Eff-is

LKP 2530 68.2% 2249 63.6% 8400 87.9%

BWRS 2522 64.6% 2262 64.7%

SRK 2528 65.6% 2261 66.2% 8368 88.2%

SRK-API 2530 65.6% 2263 66.2% 8554 87.6%

PR 2460 65.0% 2200 65.6% 8213 88.2%

Stdev 30.21 1.395% 26.63 1.098% 139.74 0.294%

Avg 2514 0.658 2247 0.652 8384 0.880

Stdev - %avg 1.20% 2.12% 1.19% 1.68% 1.67% 0.33%

Table D-5. Horsepower and Efficiency Calculations for EOS Models at Pressure Ratio of 2.2

Mix1 Mix2 Mix3

EOS Model Hp-Act Eff-is Hp-Act Eff-is Hp-Act Eff-is

LKP 8840 61.3% 7879 60.3% 28169 87.3%

BWRS 8843 60.9% 7922 61.2%

SRK 8940 61.7% 7986 62.3% 28046 87.7%

SRK-API 8949 61.7% 7994 62.3% 28689 87.1%

PR 8695 60.8% 7767 61.5% 27462 87.8%

Stdev 102.48 0.387% 92.56 0.839% 503.75 0.321%

Avg 8853 0.613 7910 0.615 28091 0.875

Stdev - %avg 1.16% 0.63% 1.17% 1.36% 1.79% 0.37%

This page is intentionally left blank.

APPENDIX E

MEASUREMENTS

This page is intentionally left blank.

APPENDIX E

Prior to determining a test uncertainty, it is important to know whether the measured variables in the test

are independent or dependent, as this determines the method of uncertainty calculation that must be

employed. For almost all real measurement scenarios, there is some physical dependency between the

input variables and, thus, unless one is absolutely certain that all measured and given system inputs are

independent, it is safer to opt for the more conservative assumption of measurement dependence. If the

measured variables in an experiment are truly found to be independent, then the method to determine total

uncertainty is simply an addition of all individual measurement uncertainties. This is mathematically

expressed as:

n

F = x1 + x2 + x3 + ... xn = xi

i =1 (E-1)

where F is the total result uncertainty and x are the individual measurement uncertainty ranges.

This is the absolute value method rather than square root of the sum of squares method, which is more

commonly utilized (as shown in E-2). The absolute value addition presents a true superposition of

individual uncertainties rather than a blended sum. This method yields more conservative uncertainty

results than the square-root-sum method, but both approaches are generally acceptable for uncertainty

analyses.

(E-2)

If the measured variables in an experiment are dependent, which is usually the case, then the analysis

becomes more complex. Specifically, the individual measurement uncertainties, x, are now functionally

related and this must be accounted for in the analysis. There are three methods that are commonly used

by engineers for this type of uncertainty analysis:

Coefficient Method

Perturbation Method

All three methods are based on a functional transfer from input to output variable but employ a different

approach to the determination of the proper transfer function.

The most traditional method for uncertainty calculations is based on determining the transfer function

using a partial derivative and adding the individual uncertainty transformations. Namely:

F F F F n

F (E-3)

= x1 + x2 + x3 + ... xn = xi

x1 x2 x3 xn i =1 xi

F

To understand this method, one must analyze the principal term xi and derive some basic

xi

physical understanding. Figure E-1 shows a graphical interpretation of the functional transformation from

range x to F using this term. Effectively, the input range x is multiplied by the slope of the function

F at the measurement point x1, x2, x3, etc., to determine the F output range. This assumes that the

function F is linear over the interval x from the specified measurement point, which is a reasonable

assumption for small x and any linear functional form. However, few physical laws are linear over a

wide range and, thus, this method will be inaccurate for steeply sloped functions combined with large

individual measurement uncertainties. Also, this method assumes that the function F is in an algebraic

form that can be readily differentiated. This is obviously not always the case as many physical governing

equations include ordinary and partial differential terms.

Coefficient Method

F

Clearly, the above partial differential can be determined numerically using a simple forward

x1

difference approach. This is commonly called the coefficient method and is shown below.

Fi F ( xi ) F ( xi + xi )

ci = =

xi xi (E-4)

and

n

F = c1 x1 + c 2 x 2 + c3 x3 + ... c n x n = ci xi

i =1 (E-5)

Both the partial derivative and coefficient method should yield identical answers when properly applied.

Again, as long as x is small and the slope of the function F is moderate, this approach will yield

reasonably accurate uncertainties. A slight variation of this approach centers the numerical derivative

around x, specifically:

F F ( x 0.5x) F ( x + 0.5x)

ci = =

x x (E-6)

This modified method often provides an improved determination of the uncertainty for measurements

centered distributions.

Unfortunately, for convenience, the coefficient method is often misapplied by assuming fixed coefficients

for a standard analysis. A number of well established engineering codes and specifications publish fixed

numbers for uncertainty coefficients of standard engineering analysis problems. This approach can only

be valid if the actual physical equation is strictly linear, which is seldom the case. Also, unless all units of

measurement are identical to those of the published coefficients, largely incorrect uncertainty results will

be obtained.

Perturbation Method

The most accurate analysis to determine total uncertainty of dependent variable measurement systems is

the perturbation method, as it is based on the actual function F and does not require any linearity

assumptions. It is simply expressed as:

= F ( x1 ) F ( x1 + x1 ) + F ( x2 ) F ( x2 + x2 ) + F ( x3 ) F ( x3 + x3 ) + ... F ( xn ) F ( xn + xn )

n

= F ( xi ) F ( xi + xi )

i =1 (E-7)

The term F ( x1 ) F ( x1 + x1 ) is graphically reviewed in Figure E-2 and demonstrates that the F

uncertainty obtained using this method is the actual transformation of x.

The variation of parameters method is implemented by sequentially perturbing the input values

(temperature, pressure, etc.) by their respective uncertainties and recording the effects on the calculated

output quantity (i.e., efficiency, power, etc.). Assuming the uncertainty perturbation is fairly small, any

term in Equation E-8 can be determined in this manner:

f

u1 f (u1 + u1 ) f (u1 )

u1 (E-8)

The contribution of the variable u1 towards the overall uncertainty can be determined by calculating f

twiceat the observed value at u1 and at the perturbed value of u1 + u1. For several variables, the results

for each term should be summed using the square-root-sum or absolute value of the individual terms. The

benefits of this approach are that it does not matter if the uncertainty is an absolute or relative number, the

procedure can be implemented using any spreadsheet program, and the values in the spreadsheet can be

the results of complex, iterative relationships.

Implementation of the Partial Derivative Method for Compressors (Enthalpy Rise Method)

The partial derivative method was described in detail by Brun and Kurz [ASME Journal of Engineering

for Gas Turbines and Power, 2001]. The implementation for the reciprocating compressor with the

Enthalpy Rise method is briefly described herein:

2

Z

2

R R Z R

Z Universal + L Universal + MW Universal 2

L MW 2 L MW

2

L MW

(E-9)

The above Equation E-9 is valid if the physical gas properties, specific heat ratio, compressibility factor,

and molecular weight are directly determined from testing. A physical property uncertainty, due to the

effect of applying uncertainties in T and p to the non-ideal gas state equation has to be included (i.e., since

there is a measurement error in T and p, there will be an added error in determining cp from the gas

equation). This uncertainty is most conveniently obtained numerically by varying temperatures and

pressures parametrically in the gas equation and, thus, determining the gradients d/dT, d/dp, dZ/dT, and

dZ/dp indirectly. Recognizing that d/dT = dL/dT and d/dp = dL/dp, one can easily determine

corrections for Z and L:

2 2

Z = T + p

T p

(E-10)

2 2

Z Z

Z = T + p

T p

(E-11)

The uncertainty in cp, is also affected by the variation of the gas properties during the duration of the test.

This effect is again mathematically difficult to describe but can be easily handled numerically using a

procedure similar to the one shown above for the variations in T and p. It is beyond the scope of this

paper to list all possible gas composition variations; however, it is important to realize that they can

strongly affect Z, L, and MW.

The uncertainty of the compressor enthalpy rise is determined using Equation E-12. Since the enthalpy

rise uncertainty is not dependent on the absolute temperatures, but rather on the temperature difference

(Td Ts), and since the specific heats (cp) for the discharge and suction are functionally related, the

temperature difference (Td Ts) should be employed for the derivation rather than the absolute

temperature values (Td, Ts).

The uncertainty for the isentropic (ideal) compressor outlet temperature is obtained using Equation E-13.

Isentropic Temperature

2

p d

L 2 2

LTs p dL 1 LTs p dL

Td ,isen = Ts + p d + p

p s p sL p sL +1

s

(E-13)

The uncertainty of the compressor efficiency is given in Equation E-15. The temperature difference

should be used rather than the absolute temperature values for the derivation of the isentropic enthalpy

given in Equation E-14.

Isentropic Enthalpy

hisen = (c (T

p d , isen Ts )) + (T

2

d , isen c p , d ,isen ) + (T c )

2

s p,s

2

(E-14)

Isentropic Efficiency

h

2 2

h

isen = isen + H isen2

H H (E-15)

Mass Flow

2 2

2 MW Q ps Q

m = p s + MW

RUniversal ZTs RUniversal ZTs

2 2

p s MW p MW Q

+ Q + Z s

RUniversal Z 2Ts

RUniversal ZTs

2

p MW Q

+ Ts s (E-16)

RUniversal ZTs2

Power

2 2

2

m H H m

P = H + m 2

m + m m

m (E-17)

The flow rate uncertainty, Q, depends strongly on the device type employed for the measurements. A

detailed discussion of flow measurement uncertainty is provided in ASME PTC 19.1 and is, thus, not

further discussed herein.

By evaluating Equations E-14 through E-17, estimates of the total measurement uncertainties for the

compressor efficiency, enthalpy rise, and required driver power can be obtained. However, one source of

measurement uncertainty that is often overlooked is the uncertainty due to a finite sample size. The above

uncertainty statistics are valid only for mean parameters with an assumed Gaussian normal distribution.

This is a good assumption for measurements where sample sizes are larger than 30. But for field tests, it

is sometimes difficult to maintain a steady state system operating condition for a time period adequate to

collect 30 or more samples.

To complete the above field test measurement uncertainty evaluation, one also needs to look at the

complete compressor package (engine and compressor efficiency) performance. The engine output power

has to equal the compressor required power (PGT = P). Thus, the following two equations can be used to

define the engine thermal efficiency, th, and the total package efficiency, sys:

Thermal Efficiency

Pin

th =

m fuel LHV (E-18)

Package Efficiency

Pcomp

sys = isenme (E-19)

Pin

Here m fuel is the fuel flow into the engine and LHV is the fuel heating value. The fuel flow is typically

measured using an orifice plate in a metering run and the heating value is determined from the chemical

composition of the fuel. Based on the above equations, the corresponding driver uncertainty, th, and

package uncertainty, sys, are given by:

Thermal Efficiency

2

2

2

+ m fuel

1 Pin Pin

th = Pin

+ LHV

(E-20)

2

m fuel LHV m LHV m fuel LHV

2

fuel

Package Efficiency

2 2 2 2 2

Pcomp

+ isen

Pcomp P m e

sys = isen m e + in + + (E-21)

P

P in comp isen Pin m e

To complete the above Equations E-20 and E-21, the only additional information needed is the fuel flow

uncertainty and the fuel heating value uncertainty. Since the fuel flow is measured in the same way as the

flow through the gas compressor, uncertainty values in Equation E-16 can be used. Also, since the

heating value is obtained directly from gas composition, the same percent uncertainty as was obtained for

the specific heat Equation E-9 can be used, namely:

LHV c p

=

LHV cp

(E-22)

By introducing the uncertainty experience values from those suggested in this guideline, the measurement

uncertainty for a field test can be predicted prior to the test. Consequently, the above method allows the

manufacturer and the end-user to determine reasonable test uncertainties, as well as necessary

requirements for the test instrumentation prior to the test. This method can also be employed to resolve

observed variations of field test performance results from theoretically predicted and/or factory test

results.

The different EOS models will provide different values of enthalpy rise, isentropic enthalpy rise, and

compressibility for the compressor based on the differences in calculated enthalpy and compressibility.

Described above were the uncertainty calculations for the Enthalpy Rise method. The use of the

perturbation method with the PV Card analysis is discussed here.

In this method the individual uncertainties must be found for each measured parameter used in power and

efficiency calculations. For efficiency calculations, the uncertainties must be considered for the

calculation of actual (ICHP) and theoretical power due to the fact that the efficiency is dependent upon

both of these calculations. The measured parameters in a performance test where uncertainty should be

considered are listed below:

Piston position ()

Compressor Speed (N)

Pressure measurement (P)

Temperature measurement (T)

Gas Composition (mol%)

Clearance volume (Vcl)

Steady state of test (if the test data is acquired when the conditions are not steady then

additional uncertainty should be included in the pressure and temperature results to account

for this)

Piston Position

To calculate the uncertainty of the power and efficiency with piston position, a phase shift equal to the

total positional uncertainty should be applied to the piston position on the measured PV diagram. This

should be done for plus (Equation E-23) and minus (Equation E-24) the positional uncertainty. Once the

shifted ICHP are calculated, the efficiencies can be found for that shift. The theoretical power should be

calculated with the measured toe pressures (not shifted values) in this step. This isolates the uncertainty

just to the effect of positional measurement variation on the measured power and calculated efficiency

with that power. The difference between the maximum and minimum ICHP (Equation E-25) and

efficiencies (Equation E-26) are the total uncertainty (ICHP and ) for the piston position

measurement.

i , plus = i +

(E-23)

=

i , min us i

(E-24)

The process described above should be repeated for the theoretical PV diagram. From this the position

uncertainty on the theoretical ICHP can be found. This can be used with the measured ICHP to determine

the uncertainty effect on the efficiency calculation.

Speed

The uncertainty due to speed variation should be calculated for both the measured and theoretical ICHP.

The speed is used to calculate the power from the area of the PV diagram or work. Equations E-27 and

(E-28) below detail how the maximum and minimum ICHPs are calculated. The uncertainty in the speed

measurement is the difference between these two values as shown in Equation E-25.

W * (N + N)

ICHPmax =

396000 (E-27)

W * (N N )

ICHPmin =

396000 (E-28)

Pressure

The calculation of the uncertainty of power and efficiency due to pressure is not completely intuitive.

One would think that the pressure uncertainty could just be added to the measured pressure and obtain the

maximum ICHP and efficiency. However, this does not work. The end result is the exact same ICHP and

efficiency calculated directly from the measured data. This is due to the fact that adding or subtracting

the pressure to the full PV diagram will only shift the diagram up or down. It will not change the area

within the diagram. In order to obtain the maximum possible ICHP from the diagram, a positive increase

in pressure should be applied to the compression and discharge event lines and a negative decrease in

pressure should be applied to the expansion and suction event lines. This will make the diagram grow

outward and a maximum ICHP can be calculated. To obtain a minimum ICHP, the opposite should be

applied: a negative decrease in pressure on the compression and discharge event lines and a positive

increase in pressure on the expansion and suction event lines. Figure E-3 shows an example of maximum

ICHP PV diagram with a 2 psig pressure uncertainty.

From the pressure uncertainty PV diagrams, the maximum and minimum ICHP can be calculated. With

this, the maximum and minimum efficiencies will be found. Again, the theoretical ICHP should be

calculated with the measured values in order to isolate the error to the variation in pressure on the actual

PV diagram power and efficiency. The total change in ICHP and efficiency due to pressure uncertainty is

then found with Equations E-25 and E-26.

This process should be repeated for the theoretical PV diagram. The measured PV diagram should be

developed with the measured values in order to isolate the uncertainty effects to the theoretical

calculation.

In many performance tests, especially with high-speed units, channel resonance will be present in the

pressure signal. This resonance is removed in order to complete flow calculations. Removing this

resonance can affect the ICHP calculated value. If the ICHP is reported from the corrected PV diagram,

then this ICHP should be compared to the ICHP of the uncorrected diagram. Any difference between

these two ICHPs should be included as uncertainty in the power and efficiency.

90

80

Maximum ICHP

70

Original ICHP

60

Pressure (psig)

50

40

30

20

10

0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

Volume (in3)

Temperature and Gas Composition

The temperature and gas composition are used in the PV Card method to generate the theoretical diagram.

These values have no effects on the actual ICHP calculation. They do influence the uncertainty of the

efficiency through the theoretical or isentropic power. The development of the theoretical PV diagram

should be done with one of the methods discussed in Appendix B. The uncertainty is found by varying

the temperature and gas composition with their specific uncertainties. For example, the theoretical ICHP

should be found for a maximum temperature (Toriginal + T) and for a minimum temperature. The same

will be done for the gas composition. The difference between the maximum and minimum ICHP and

efficiency will be the uncertainty due to temperature measurements and gas composition (Equation E-25).

When determining this uncertainty, the actual ICHP should be calculated with the measured values, in

order to isolate the effect of the uncertainty to the generation of the theoretical PV diagram. If the

compressor operates at steady state during the performance test, then this uncertainty will be minimal

(less than 0.01%) and perhaps negligible. However, tests that are performed at unsteady conditions

should account for this uncertainty.

Clearance Volume

Uncertainty in the clearance volume will affect the theoretical ICHP and flow calculations. For the

theoretical ICHP, the uncertainty in clearance volume affects the expansion and compression curves of

the PV diagram. A positive increase and negative decrease in clearance volume should be applied to the

PV diagrams separately in order to obtain the maximum and minimum ICHP and efficiencies. The

differences in these maxima and minima are the uncertainty of the ICHP and efficiency due to the

uncertainty in the clearance volume (Equation E-25).

Up to this point, only the determination of uncertainty for individual measurements has been explained.

To determine the overall compressor uncertainty, first, the individual uncertainties for each cylinder end

should be combined with a root mean sum (Equation E-29). Once the uncertainty of each cylinder end is

known, then these can be summed to determine the total deviation for the measured ICHP (Equation E-

30). The equations below also apply to the theoretical ICHP uncertainty calculation.

2

i + 1 , cyl 1 HE )

2

+ ...

(E-29)

ICHP comp = ICHP cyl 1 HE + ICHP cyl 1 CE + ICHP cyl 2 HE + ... (E-30)

Efficiency uncertainties can be calculated for each individual cylinder end as discussed above. This gives

insight into the error in the efficiency for each cylinder end, but these values are not used to calculate the

overall efficiency uncertainty. Due to the method which efficiencies are calculated, they cannot be

averaged or summed like the power value can to obtain an overall efficiency uncertainty. Therefore, the

overall efficiency uncertainty is calculated using the overall deviations found for the measured and

theoretical ICHPs. Equations E-31 and E-32 below detail how the minimum and maximum efficiencies

should be calculated. The difference in these two values (Equation E-33) gives the overall uncertainty in

the efficiency of the compressor.

Pcomp ,isen + Pcomp ,isen

comp ,max =

ICHPcomp ICHPcomp

(E-31)

comp ,min =

ICHPcomp + ICHPcomp

(E-32)

=

comp comp , max comp , min

(E-33)

This page is intentionally left blank.

APPENDIX F

This page is intentionally left blank.

APPENDIX F

The following is a discussion of the different effects that can be observed and diagnosed with a PV

diagram. Each of the effects is discussed individually. It should be noted that in practice typically the PV

diagram will have multiple influences. The effects discussed below are suction valve leakage,

compressor rod pressure package leakage, discharge valve leakage, piston ring leakage, pulsation effects,

and valve and cylinder gas passage losses.

Figure F-1 illustrates the P-V diagram of a typical compressor cylinder with suction valve leakage. The

difference between the theoretical P-V diagram and the actual P-V diagram will depend on the severity

of leakage through the suction valves. Following is a step-by-step analysis of the P-V diagram in Figure

F-1.

Line 1-2A: During the compression portion of the cycle, gas leaks out of the cylinder through the suction

valves. Since less gas remains in the cylinder than the cylinder is designed for, more piston travel is

required than the design piston travel to reach the discharge valve opening pressure. The cylinder volume

at Point 2A is smaller than the volume at Point 2, resulting in the actual EVd being smaller than the design

EVd.

Line 2A-3B: During this portion of the cycle, gas is exiting the cylinder through the discharge valves and

continues to leak through the suction valves. Should the leakage be great enough, the discharge valve

will close prematurely at Point 3B. The actual EVd will be smaller than the design EVd.

Line 3B-3A: The discharge valve has closed prematurely. The cylinder volume continues to grow

smaller, causing gas to leak through the suction valves. The internal pressure at Point 3A is less than the

design pressure at Point 3. This effect may not be noticeable except in cases of major valve failure.

Line 3A-4A: During the expansion portion of the cycle, gas continues to leak through the suction valves.

Less gas is present in the cylinder than the cylinder is designed for, resulting in a premature opening of

the suction valves at the Point 4A.

Line 4A-1: The premature opening of the suction valves causes the actual EVs to be greater than the

design EVs.

Detailed below are some of the symptoms that will be observed if there are suction valve leaks in the

compressor.

The externally measured cylinder capacity will be less than the design cylinder capacity.

The gas temperature at the cylinder inlet will be greater than that measured during normal

operation.

The discharge gas temperature will be greater than that observed during normal operation.

The actual compression and expansion lines will not match the design compression and

expansion lines.

Capacity calculations based on EVs will be greater than capacity calculations based on EVd.

The characteristics of the PV diagram for compressor rod pressure package leaks will be the same as

suction valve leakage; however, there will be no temperature rise noticed at the suction and discharge

cavities.

Figure F-2 illustrates the P-V diagram of a typical compressor cylinder which is experiencing discharge

valve leakage. The difference between the actual P-V diagram and the design P-V diagram will

depend on the severity of leakage through the discharge valves. Following is a step-by-step analysis of

the P-V diagram in Figure F-2.

Line 3-4A: In the expansion portion of the cycle, the trapped gas in the cylinder is expanding and gas is

leaking into the cylinder through the discharge valves. The suction valve opens at a cylinder volume

corresponding to the volume at point 4A which is greater than the design volume at point 4. This causes

the actual EVs to be smaller than the design EVs.

Line 4A-1B: During the intake portion of the cycle, gas is entering the cylinder through the suction valves

and gas is leaking into the cylinder through the discharge valves. The internal pressure of the cylinder

will rise to the point which will cause premature closure of the suction valves at Point 1B. This results in

smaller EVs than design.

Line 1B-1A: The suction valve has closed, cylinder volume is increasing and the internal cylinder

pressure is rising, resulting in a higher pressure at Point 1A than design Point 1.

Line 1A-2A: The actual compression line will not match the design compression line since the pressure at

1A is not the same as the pressure at 1. Gas is leaking into the cylinder through the discharge valves

throughout the compression portion of the cycle. The discharge valve opens prematurely at 2A because

the pressure at 1A was higher than design and gas continued to leak into the cylinder during the

compression stroke.

Line 2A-3: The actual EVd is larger than the design EVd due to the premature opening of the discharge

valve.

Detailed below are some of the symptoms that will be observed if there are discharge valve leaks in the

compressor.

The actual discharge temperature will be higher than the discharge temperature observed in

normal operation.

The measured cylinder capacity will be less than the design cylinder capacity.

Capacity calculations based on EVd will be greater than capacity calculations based on EVs.

The actual compression and expansion lines will differ from the design compression and

expansion lines. The value of the compression line exponent will be greater than normal,

while the expansion line exponent will be less than normal.

Figure F-3 illustrates the P-V diagram of a typical compressor cylinder which is experiencing piston ring

leakage. The shape of the actual P-V diagram will depend on the severity of the piston ring leakage.

Following is a step-by-step analysis of Figure F-3.

Line 1A-2A: As the pressure in the cylinder increases, an increasing amount of gas escapes from the

cylinder past the piston rings. Greater piston travel (smaller cylinder volume) is required to bring the

internal pressure of the cylinder to the discharge valve opening pressure than design. If the discharge

valve opening is delayed, occurring at Point 2A instead of Point 2, the actual EVd will be smaller than

design.

Line 2A-3B: During the discharge portion of the cycle, gas is exiting the cylinder through the discharge

valves and leaking out of the cylinder past the piston rings. Should the leakage be severe enough,

premature closing of the discharge valve can occur at Point 3B.

Line 3B-3A: The discharge valves have closed, the cylinder volume continues to decrease, and gas

continues to leak from the cylinder past the piston rings. The pressure at Point 3A is lower than design

pressure (Point 3).

Line 3A-4A: The actual expansion line will not be the same as the design expansion line since it begins at

a lower pressure (Point 3A). Gas continues to leak out of the cylinder for a portion of the expansion

cycle. The lower design pressure at Point 3A and the additional gas leakage result in the premature

opening of the suction valves (in double-acting cylinders this can vary depending on gas state point in the

opposite end).

Line 4A-1B: Gas is entering the cylinder through the suction valves and is leaking into the cylinder past

the piston rings. The leakage results in the premature closing of the suction valves at Point 1B (double-

acting cylinder).

Line 1B-1A: The suction valves have closed, the cylinder volume is increasing, and the pressure in the

cylinder is increasing due to continued piston ring leakage. The pressure at Point 1A is higher than

design pressure (Point 1).

Detailed below are some of the symptoms that will be observed if there are piston ring leaks in the

compressor.

The externally measured capacity will be lower than the design capacity.

The discharge temperature observed in normal operation will be higher than the design

discharge temperature (double- acting cylinder).

Capacity calculations based on EVs will not agree with capacity calculations based on EVd.

The measured compression and expansion lines will not match the design compression and

expansion lines.

Pulsation Effects

While the suction and discharge valves are open, the acoustic pulsation present in the system is reflected

into the compressor cylinder. Should the pulsation levels be of sufficient amplitude, the valve opening

and closing times can be affected, and the average inlet and/or discharge pressures of the cylinder can be

different than the design pressures. The net result being horsepower and capacity values, which are

different than the design values. These values may be greater or smaller, depending on the pulsation

characteristics. The change in horsepower and flow may be proportional, resulting in actual

BHP/MMSCFD figures that are the same as design; however, the predicted loading curves will no longer

be accurate.

Valve loss is the pressure drop through the compressor valve. Cylinder gas passage loss is pressure drop

between the cylinder flange and the compressor valve. Should these losses exceed the allowances which

were made for them in the cylinder design; the actual flow will be less than the design flow. (Note that

these losses are also affected by the gas pulsations.) Compressor performance problems are generally due

to the cylinder effects, if it has been determined that:

All compressor cylinder design parameters have been met (bore, stroke, fixed clearance,

clearance pocket volumes, compressor speed, Ts, Zs, ps, pd).

No cylinder operational problems are present (compressor valve leakage and/or piston ring

leakage).

This page is intentionally left blank.

APPENDIX G

POLYTROPIC EFFICIENCY

This page is intentionally left blank.

APPENDIX G

The polytropic process is also a reversible process like the isentropic process, but it is not adiabatic. It is

defined by an infinite number of small isentropic steps followed by heat exchange. The heat exchange is

necessary for constant polytropic efficiency. Both isentropic and polytropic processes are ideal, reference

processes.

n 1

P

n pd n P

P

H = P

P

1 f p S S

n 1 p S

(G-1)

The polytropic exponent, nP, is found with Equation G-2. This exponent should be based on the same

conditions used to find hs and hd.

pd

ln

ps

nP =

S

ln

d (G-2)

The polytropic efficiency is calculated based upon the polytropic enthalpy rise and the polytropic

exponent, nP, as defined in the equation below:

n 1

P

n P

p d n P

P 1 f p s s

(n 1) p s

hdP hs

=P

=

hd hs hd hs (G-3)

This page is intentionally left blank.

APPENDIX H

This page is intentionally left blank.

APPENDIX H

Heat loss estimations are necessary in order to have accurate compressor performance predictions. This is

true for the Enthalpy Rise method. Energy lost due to temperature differences or cooling has a direct

effect on the efficiency of the compressor. Loss estimates are needed when the compressor has cylinder

cooling systems, the instrumentation is installed such that the losses must be accounted for, or the

compressor is being operated in an environment where the ambient temperature is largely different from

the surface temperature of the compressor. However, in many cases, the heat losses are very small and

can be considered negligible. If this is thought to be the case, then the tester may want to complete order

of magnitude calculations to verify that more detailed calculations are not necessary.

Figure H-1 shows a schematic of the energy exchange in a compressor. The potential heat losses for the

compressor are shown as energy leaving on the bottom of the figure. If the components of the

compressor are cooler than the ambient temperature, which is often true for the suction bottle, then the

energy could be entering instead of leaving. Any further discussions on heat losses will include reference

to heat energy, both entering and leaving the compressor. The direction will be dictated by the thermal

gradient.

Power In -

Compression

Suction

Bottle

Compressor Bottle

Losses Losses Losses Losses

Bottle Heat Bottle Heat

Cylinder

Losses Losses

Cooling Heat

Removal

Figure H-1. Schematic of Energy Exchange in Reciprocating Compressor

Computer programs are available that can be used to perform thermal or heat loss analysis on machines of

complex geometry. Basic methods for calculating heat losses are discussed below. This method is based

on calculated heat loss curves for typical compressor bottle geometries with the equations discussed in

Appendices B and C of IEEE 515, Standard for the Testing, Design, Installation, and Maintenance of

Electrical Resistance Heat Tracing for Industrial Applications.

The total losses are calculated by adding the losses calculated for the bottle and for the pipe as shown in

Equation H-1. The calculation of the individual losses for bottles and pipes are discussed below.

Q = Qb + Q p

(H-1)

Qb = Bottle heat loss (Btu/hr)

Qp = Pipe heat loss (Btu/hr)

In all the cases discussed below, natural convection refers to the condition where the wind velocity is less

than 1 mph. If the wind velocity (V) exceeds 1 mph, then the heat transfer coefficients should be found

using the forced convection coefficients.

Bottle Losses

The total heat loss (Q) from the bottle is determined from the convective heat transfer (Qc) and radiation

heat transfer (Qr). These two values are calculated as discussed in the following sections. The convective

heat transfer is either calculated as natural or forced convection depending on the wind velocity (V).

Q = Qc + Q r (H-2)

Qc = Convective heat transfer (Btu/hr)

Qr = Radiation heat transfer (Btu/hr)

Radiation (Qr)

The steps to determine the radiation heat transfer are detailed below.

1. Measure the surface temperature of the bottle (Ts), the ambient temperature of the air (T),

diameter of the bottle (D), and length of the bottle (L).

2. Determine the emissivity () of the surface of the bottle. Common emissivity values are shown in

Figure H-2.

Ts + T

Tm =

2 (H-3)

Ts = Bottle surface temperature (deg F)

T = Ambient temperature (deg F)

4. Determine the value of the radiation heat transfer coefficient (hr) from Figure H-2 with the mean

temperature (Tm) and emissivity of the bottle ().

5. Calculate the surface area of the bottle (A) with the Equation H-4.

D2

A = 3.14 D * L +

2

(H-4)

D = Diameter of bottle (ft)

L = Length of bottle (ft)

6. Calculate the radiation heat loss of the bottle (Qr) with the Equation H-5.

Qr = hr A(Ts T ) (H-5)

hr = Radiation heat transfer coefficient (Btu/hr-ft2-deg F)

A = Surface area of bottle (ft2)

Ts = Surface temperature of bottle (deg F)

T = Ambient temperature (deg F)

1.6

Common Emissivity Values Tm = 10

Stainless Steel: 0.21-0.6 Tm = 30

1.4 Plated metals: 0.08-0.09 Tm = 50

Concrete: 0.88 Tm = 70

Black Paint: 0.97 Tm = 90

1.2 White Paint: 0.93 Tm = 110

Tm = 130

Tm = 150

hr (Btu/h-ft -degF)

1.0

2

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.0

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Figure H-2. Radiation Heat Transfer Coefficient with Emissivity and Mean Temperature

The steps to determine the convective heat transfer from natural convection are detailed below. These

steps apply when the wind velocity is less than 1 mph.

1. Measure the surface temperature of the bottle (Ts), the ambient temperature of the air (T),

diameter of the bottle (D), and length of the bottle (L). (These are the same values measured for

the radiation heat loss.)

3. Calculate the parameter X using Equation H-6.

Ts T

X =

Ts + T + 920 (H-6)

X = Parameter used in Figure H-3

Ts = Surface temperature of bottle (deg F)

T = Ambient temperature (deg F)

4. Using the mean temperature (Tm) and the parameter X, find the value of the natural convection

heat transfer coefficient (hn) from Figure H-3.

5. Calculate the surface area of the bottle (A) with the Equation H-4.

6. Calculate the natural convection heat loss of the bottle (Qc) with the Equation H-7.

Qc = hn A(Ts T ) (H-7)

hn = Natural convection heat transfer coefficient (Btu/hr-ft2-deg F)

A = Surface area of bottle (ft2)

Ts = Surface temperature of bottle (deg F)

T = Ambient temperature (deg F)

1.1

0.9

hn (Btu/h-ft -degF)

0.8

2

0.7

Tm = 10

Tm = 30

0.6 Tm = 50

Tm = 70

Tm = 90

0.5 Tm = 110

Tm = 130

Tm = 150

0.4

0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2

Figure H-3. Natural Convection Heat Transfer Coefficient with X and Mean Temperature

The steps to determine the convective heat transfer from forced convection are detailed below. These

steps apply when the wind velocity is greater than 1 mph.

1. Measure the surface temperature of the bottle (Ts), the ambient temperature of the air (T),

diameter of the bottle (D), length of the bottle (L), and the wind velocity (V). (Many of these are

the same values measured for the radiation heat loss.)

3. Calculate the parameter Y using Equation H-8.

Y = (V * L )

0.8

(H-8)

V = Wind velocity (mph)

L = Length of Bottle (ft)

4. Using the mean temperature (Tm) and the parameter Y, find the value of the forced convection

heat transfer coefficient (Hf) from Figure H-4.

5. Calculate the surface area of the bottle (A) with the Equation H-4.

6. Calculate the forced convection heat loss of the bottle (Qc) with the Equation H-9.

H f A(Ts T )

Qc =

L (H-9)

Hf = Forced convection heat transfer coefficient (Btu/hr-ft2-deg F)

A = Surface area of bottle (ft2)

L = Length of Bottle (ft)

Ts = Surface temperature of bottle (deg F)

T = Ambient temperature (deg F)

250

225

200

175

Hf (Btu/h-ft-degF)

150

125

100 Tm = 10

Tm = 30

75 Tm = 50

Tm = 70

50 Tm = 90

Tm = 110

25 Tm = 130

Tm = 150

0

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

(V*L)0.8 (mph*ft)

Figure H-4. Forced Convection Heat Transfer Coefficient with Y and Mean Temperature

Pipe Losses

Heat losses occur on non-insulated pipe. These may be significant if the instrumentation is installed far

away from the compressor. If the instruments are installed close to the compressor being tested, then

these losses do not have to be considered since they will be minimal (<0.5% of total heat losses).

The total heat loss (Q) from the pipe is determined from the convective heat transfer (Qc) and radiation

heat transfer (Qr). These two values are calculated as discussed in the following sections. The convective

heat transfer is either calculated as natural or forced convection depending on the wind velocity (V).

Q = Qc + Q r (H-10)

Qc = Convective heat transfer (Btu/hr)

Qr = Radiation heat transfer (Btu/hr)

Radiation (Qr)

The radiation for pipes is calculated with the same method for bottles. The exception to the process is the

surface area in step 5. Use Equation H-11 below to calculate the surface area of a pipe.

A = 3.14 * D * L (H-11)

D = Diameter of pipe (ft)

L = Length of pipe (ft)

The steps to determine the convective heat transfer from natural convection on pipes are detailed below.

These steps apply when the wind velocity is less than 1 mph.

1. Measure the surface temperature of the pipe (Ts), the ambient temperature of the air (T),

diameter of the pipe (D), and length of the pipe (L). (These are the same values measured for the

radiation heat loss.)

T = Ts T (H-12)

Ts = Surface temperature of pipe (deg F)

T = Ambient temperature (deg F)

3. Using the temperature difference (T) and either the length (L, vertical pipes) or diameter (D,

horizontal pipes), find the natural convection heat transfer coefficient from Figure H-5 or Figure

H-6.

0.6

0.5

0.4

hn (Btu/h-ft -degF)

2

0.3

L = 10

0.2 L = 20

L = 30

L = 40

L = 50

0.1 L = 60

L = 70

L = 80

0

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

T = Ts - T (deg F)

Figure H-5. Natural Convection Heat Transfer Coefficient for Vertical Pipes with T and Length

1.2

0.8

hn (Btu/h-ft -degF)

2

0.6

D = 10

0.4 D = 14

D = 18

D = 22

D = 26

0.2 D = 30

D = 34

D = 42

0

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

T = Ts - T (deg F)

Figure H-6. Natural Convection Heat Transfer Coefficient for Horizontal Pipes with T and

Diameter

4. Calculate the surface area of the pipe (A) with the Equation H-11.

5. Calculate the natural convection heat loss of the pipe (Qc) with the Equation H-13.

Qc = hn A(Ts T ) (H-13)

hn = Natural convection heat transfer coefficient (Btu/hr-ft2-deg F)

A = Surface area of pipe (ft2)

Ts = Surface temperature of pipe (deg F)

T = Ambient temperature (deg F)

The steps to determine the convective heat transfer from forced convection are detailed below. These

steps apply when the wind velocity is greater than 1 mph.

1. Measure the surface temperature of the pipe (Ts), the ambient temperature of the air (T),

diameter of the pipe (D), length of the pipe (L), and the wind velocity (V). (Many of these are the

same values measured for the radiation heat loss.)

3. Calculate the parameter Z using Equation H-14.

Z=

(V * D )0.805

D (H-14)

V = Wind velocity (mph)

L = Diameter of pipe (in)

4. Using the mean temperature (Tm) and the parameter Z, find the value of the forced convection

heat transfer coefficient (hf) from Figure H-7.

5. Calculate the surface area of the pipe (A) with the Equation H-11.

6. Calculate the forced convection heat loss of the pipe (Qc) with the Equation H-15.

Qc = h f A(Ts T )

(H-15)

hf = Forced convection heat transfer coefficient (Btu/hr-ft2-deg F)

A = Surface area of pipe (ft2)

Ts = Surface temperature of pipe (deg F)

T = Ambient temperature (deg F)

7

5

hf (Btu/h-ft -degF)

4

2

3

Tm = 10

Tm = 30

2 Tm = 50

Tm = 70

Tm = 90

1 Tm = 110

Tm = 130

Tm = 150

0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Figure H-7. Forced Convection Heat Transfer Coefficient with Z and Mean Temperature

Some reciprocating compressor cylinders will have cooling jackets to be removed heat during

compression. This is especially true for process compressors. The heat removed from cylinder cooling

needs to be considered in the performance test in order to obtain an accurate efficiency calculation. The

steps detailed below will give a sufficient estimate of the energy removed with cylinder cooling.

The method detailed below assumes the energy change in the cooling medium will be representative of

the energy change in the gas due to cooling. There will be some energy change difference due to heat

transfer through the housing of the cylinder and cooling passages, but the analysis below assumes this to

be negligible.

Q = m C p (T2 T1 ) (H-16)

m Mass flow rate of cooling medium (lbm/hr)

Cp Specific heat of cooling medium (Btu/lbm-deg F) at mean temperature Tm (deg F), see

Equation H-17 (for water it is 1 Btu/lbm-deg F and ethylene glycol 0.678 Btu/lbm-deg F)

T2 Exit temperature of cooling medium (deg F)

T1 Inlet temperature of cooling medium (deg F)

T2 + T1

Tm = (H-17)

2

This page is intentionally left blank.

APPENDIX I

This page is intentionally left blank.

APPENDIX I

This appendix reviews example calculations for an individual cylinder end performance test conducted

with the PV Card method. It covers the calculation of cylinder volume from compressor geometry,

construction of measured PV diagram, calculation of ICHP from the measured PV diagram, development

of theoretical PV diagram, calculation of cylinder end efficiency, calculation of cylinder end flow, and

calculation of uncertainty of power and efficiency. The calculations completed here are for a

transmission compressor.

The first step in this process is to assemble the data required for the calculations that need to be performed

for this test. This data is listed below for the example.

Process Fluid = Natural Gas

Gas Composition

Methane (C1) = 90.315%

Ethane (C2) = 6.006%

Propane (C3) = 1.018%

Iso-Butane (IC4) = 0.113%

N-Butane (NC4) = 0.141%

Iso-Pentane (IC5) = 0.04%

N-Pentane (NC5) = 0.04%

Heavies (C6+) = 0.025%

Nitrogen = 0.509%

Carbon Dioxide = 1.803%

Equation of State = BWRS

Isentropic Constant (k) = 1.36

Piston Stroke (S) = 5.5 in

Piston Rod Diameter (d) = 2.5 in

Connecting Rod Length (l) = 17 in

Piston Phase = 0 deg

Cylinder Area = 92.88 in2

Volume of Stroke (Vstroke) = 510.87 in3

% Clearance (CL%) = 58.9%

Clearance Volume (Vcl) = 301.11 in3

Discharge Pressure (pd) = 992.66 psia

Suction Temperature (Ts) = 61.56 deg F

Discharge Temperature (Td) =102.82 deg F

Encoder Resolution = 512

Construction of Measured PV Diagram

During testing, each time the encoder triggered, pressure data was collected. Since the encoder used for

the test was a 512 encoder, 512 pressure points were recorded for the test. The encoder provided the

rotational position (in degrees) of the shaft at each pressure measurement. From this rotational position,

the gas volume in the cylinder is calculated for each point. This is done with Equation I-1 below. An

example of this calculation is shown below when theta equals 30 degrees. This volume matches with a

pressure of 846.55 psia. Once all the volumes are calculated, the PV diagram can be constructed as

shown in Figure I-1.

S 2

V= (1 cos ) l sin + l * B 2 + Vcl

2 S

2 2 4

(I-1)

Example

5.5in 2

V30 deg = (

1 cos 30 o ) (17in) 2 5.5in

2

sin 30 o + 17in * (10.875in ) + 301.11in 3

2 2 4

V30 deg = 340.5in 3

1200

1100

1000

Pressure (psig)

900

800

700

600

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

Volume (in^3)

As can be seen, the PV diagram in Figure I-1 has channel resonance present. Calculation of the ICHP is

not affected by the channel resonance since it is a sinusoidal phenomenon, but the other calculations such

as volumetric efficiency and flow are affected by it. Therefore, channel resonance needs to be removed

before proceeding further. The channel resonance is removed with filtering techniques and the result is

shown below in Figure I-2.

1200

HE

HE - Corrected

1100

1000

Pressure (psig)

900

800

700

600

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

Volume (in^3)

Once the PV diagram is constructed, the ICHP can be calculated. During this process the pressure

volume diagram is integrated to determine the area inside of the card, which is the work applied to the

gas. The area below the expansion and constant suction pressure line will be subtracted from the area

below the compression and constant discharge pressure line as shown in Figure I-3. This integration can

be performed with any typical integration algorithm; Trapezoidal rule, Simpsons rule, and others. In this

example, a variation of the Trapezoidal rule was used. The basic equation for the integration is Equation

I-2. V represents volume, i indicates which step is being integrated, p is the pressure, and n is maximum

number of steps. The maximum number of steps would typically correspond to the resolution of the

encoder used for the performance test.

n 1

Work = pdV =

1

( pn + p1 )Vn V1 + 1 ( pi + pi +1 )Vi Vi +1

2 2 i =1, 2,3, 4,... (I-2)

The integration of the pressure-volume diagram as shown in Figure I-3 gave a value of 123,719 in-lbs.

ICHP is calculated from the work with Equation I-3. The resulting ICHP of the PV diagram is 312.0 HP.

W *N

ICHP =

396000 (I-3)

Example

ICHP =

396000

ICHP= 312.0 HP

1100 1100

1000 1000

900 900

Pressure (psig)

Pressure (psig)

800 800

700 700

600 600

200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

Volume (in^3) Volume (in^3)

Discharge Pressure Lines Suction Pressure Lines

1100

1000

900

Pressure (psig)

800

700

600

200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

Volume (in^3)

Area Inside Pressure-Volume Trace

The suction and discharge volumetric efficiency can be calculated using Equations 3-14 and 3-15, but it

can also be determined from the PV diagram. First, the PV diagram is observed for where the suction

valve opens on the cycle and where the discharge valve closes on the cycle. These locations with

corresponding gas volumes are indicated on the PV diagram in Figure I-4. The suction volumetric

efficiency is calculated with the ratio of volume differences as shown in Equation I-4. The discharge

volumetric efficiency is calculated under the same premise with Equation I-5. In both of these equations,

the volume when the valve opens is the total volume minus the clearance volume. In the example shown

below, the clearance volume is subtracted from the volumes listed on Figure I-4. The suction and

discharge volumetric efficiencies for this example are 88.3% and 72.1%, respectively.

EVs = *100%

Vstroke (I-4)

EVd = 1 * 100%

(I-5)

V stroke

Example

EVs = *100%

510.87in 3

EVs = 88.3%

1100

1000

900 V = 669.3 in3

Pressure (psig)

800 V = 360.9 in3

700

600

200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

Volume (in^3)

Procedures for the construction of the theoretical PV diagram are discussed in detail in Appendix B, so it

will not be repeated here. The toe pressures and volumes used for the construction are listed below. The

theoretical PV diagram is shown plotted in Figure I-5 with the corrected PV diagram previously

generated.

Pressure = 992.66 psia

Volume = 301.11 in3

Start of Compression Line

Pressure = 754.80 psia

Volume = 811.98 in3

The isentropic constant was determined to be 1.36, with an EOS solver using the suction temperature and

pressure. The K1 and K2 factors were calculated to be 2,332,742 and 6,836,181, respectively. The

volumes and pressures at the end of the expansion and compression lines were found to be the values

listed below.

End of Expansion Line

Pressure = 754.80 psia

Volume = 368.3 in3

End of Compression Line

Pressure = 992.66 psia

Volume = 663.8 in3

1100

HE - Corrected

Theoretical

1000

900

Pressure (psig)

800

700

600

200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

Volume (in^3)

After the theoretical PV diagram is constructed the isentropic ICHP can be calculated following the same

integration procedure described above for the measured ICHP. The ICHP for the theoretical PV diagram

shown in Figure I-5 is 239.85 HP.

Calculation of Efficiency

The efficiency of the compressor is calculated from the ratio of the measured ICHP and the theoretical

ICHP as shown in Equation I-6.

Pisen

isen,cyl = *100%

ICHP (I-6)

Example

239.85 HP

isen ,cyl = *100%

312.0 HP

isen ,cyl = 76.9%

Calculation of Capacity

The capacity can be calculated with any of the equations shown in the guideline. For this example,

Equation I-7 is used as shown below.

Q=

(CQ )* (B* 2

)

r 2 * S * N * EVs * p s * Z STD

Ts * Z s (I-7)

The compressibility must be calculated for the standard conditions (14.7 psia and 60 deg F) and for the

suction conditions for the gas being compressed. There are ways to calculate these values analytically as

discussed in Appendix C, but perhaps the easiest method for calculating this is to use an EOS solver.

With the solver, the appropriate EOS can be selected and the compressibility can be determined for the

standard and suction conditions. Using a BWRS EOS solver, the compressibilites at the standard and

suction conditions were found to be 0.9949 and 0.8694, respectively. The rest of the values included in

Equation I-7 are known from cylinder geometry or measured and calculated parameters. The flow

through the cylinder end is calculated as shown below.

Example

Q=

(0.2314 *10 )* ((10.875 in )

6 2

)

0 2 * 5.5 in * 998.5 RPM * 88.3 * 754.80 psia * 0.9949

(61.56 deg F + 460 R )* 0.8694

Q = 21.98 MMSCFD

The rod diameter in this calculation is set to zero since the cylinder end is on the head end. The flow

through this cylinder end is 21.98 MMSCFD.

There are several different methods that can be used to calculate uncertainty. This example will use the

perturbation method as described in Appendix E of the guideline. The measured ICHP has uncertainty

due to four variables: pressure, piston position, speed, and channel resonance. The pressure and position

uncertainty are important, since these are the properties measured in order to generate the PV diagram

during a single cycle. The speed uncertainty is included, since the compressor speed is used to calculate

the power from the work from the PV diagram. Channel resonance is included, because the data is

filtered before calculations are completed. It was mentioned before that channel resonance is a sinusoidal

phenomenon and does not affect the power. However, when the resonance is removed with filtering,

there is a possibility that other valuable data could be lost. The uncertainty for this parameter is the

difference between the ICHP calculated before and after the channel resonance has been removed.

To calculate the uncertainty in the ICHP, each parameter is varied independently while the other

parameters are held constant. The difference between ICHP with the positive and negative changes in the

parameter is the total uncertainty for that parameter. The calculation of the uncertainty in ICHP for each

of the four parameters mentioned above is discussed below.

Pressure

The first step in calculating the uncertainty of the ICHP due to pressure is to determine the uncertainty in

the pressure measurement itself. In this example, the pressure uncertainty was calculated from the

accuracy of the pressure transducer, calibration uncertainty, and data acquisition uncertainty. These

uncertainty values are listed below.

Calibration Uncertainty = 0.5 psi

Data Acquisition Uncertainty = 0.05 psi

Total Uncertainty = 2.05 psi

Once the pressure measurement uncertainty is known, the uncertainty of the ICHP due to pressure can be

calculated. The uncertainty due to pressure in the ICHP is slightly different than the process described

above. Applying only a positive change in pressure or only a negative change in pressure will just shift

the PV diagram up or down. It will not cause any change in the ICHP. Therefore the positive and

negative variations are used in conjunction. For the maximum ICHP change, a positive pressure change

is applied to the compression line and constant discharge line and a negative pressure change is applied to

the expansion line and constant suction line. The opposite is done for the minimum ICHP. An example

of the maximum ICHP variation is show in Figure E-4.

The work is then calculated from these maximum and minimum PV diagrams using the integration

discussed above and the ICHP is calculated with the compressor speed. The maximum and minimum

ICHP are 317.3 and 306.8 HP, respectively, resulting in an uncertainty in the ICHP from pressure of 10.5

HP.

Piston Position

The piston position uncertainty is due to the resolution of the encoder, ODC marking and

synchronization, and the data acquisition uncertainty. These values of these uncertainties are outlined

below.

ODC Determination = 0.1 deg

Synchronization Uncertainty = 0.1 deg

Data Acquisition Uncertainty = 0.01 deg

Total Uncertainty = 0.913 deg

The uncertainty is added and subtracted from the measured position of the shaft. Figure I-6 shows the PV

diagrams with the positive and negative change in piston position.

The ICHP calculated from the positive and negative changes in piston position are 309.4 and 314.7 HP

for a total uncertainty of 5.3 HP.

Speed

The speed can be measured by an encoder or with a one-per-revolution device. In this example, a

magnetic pick-up was used to measure the speed of rotation. This device had an uncertainty of 0.1% of

the measured value which correlated to an absolute uncertainty of approximately 1 RPM. The uncertainty

calculation for speed is shown below.

1200

Plus

1100 Minus

1000

Pressure (psia)

900

800

700

600

200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

Volume (in^3)

Example

Maximum ICHP

ICHPmax =

396000

ICHPmax = 312.3HP

Minimum ICHP

ICHPmin =

396000

ICHPmin = 311.6 HP

Total Uncertainty

ICHP = 312.3 HP 311.6 HP

ICHP = 0.7 HP

Channel Resonance

The uncertainty from channel resonance is actually the uncertainty of the filtering process. It is calculated

from the difference between ICHP calculated from the measured PV diagram and the corrected PV

diagram. The ICHP from the corrected PV diagram was found above to be 312.0 HP. The ICHP from

the uncorrected PV diagram is 310.8 HP which results in a total uncertainty of 1.2 HP due to the filtering

process.

Total Measured ICHP Uncertainty

Once the uncertainty due to each measured parameter is determined, the total uncertainty for the

measured ICHP can be determined. This value is found by calculating the root mean sum of all the

uncertainties (Equation I-8). This calculation is shown in Table I-1.

This shows the total uncertainty for the measured ICHP for this cylinder end is 11.8 HP or 3.78% of

measured ICHP.

2

i +1,cyl 1 HE )

2

+ ...

(I-8)

Table I-1. Calculation of Total Uncertainty of Measured ICHP for Cylinder End

Parameter Uncertainty (HP) Square of Uncertainty (HP2)

Pressure 10.5 110.25

Piston Position 5.3 28.09

Speed 0.7 0.49

Channel Resonance 1.2 1.44

Sum of Squares 140.27

Square Root of Sum 11.8 HP

The theoretical ICHP uncertainty is calculated in the same manner that the measured ICHP uncertainty is:

a combination of uncertainties from various parameters. However, there is a difference in the parameters

which must be included in the uncertainty analysis. For the theoretical ICHP uncertainty, the parameters

which must be considered are pressure, isentropic constant, speed, and clearance volume.

Pressure

The toe pressures obtained from the measured PV diagram are used to construct the theoretical PV

diagram. The uncertainty in the pressure measurement is applied to the toe pressures to obtain the

uncertainty in the theoretical ICHP from pressure. The pressure measurement uncertainty of 2.05 psi was

used to determine the toe pressures. From these toe pressures and with an isentropic constant of 1.36, the

end points of both the compression and expansion lines were calculated. The calculated values, along

with the maximum and minimum theoretical ICHP, are shown in Table I-2. The uncertainty of the

theoretical ICHP is calculated from the difference between the maximum and minimum theoretical ICHP

which equals to 6 HP.

Isentropic Constant

The uncertainty of the isentropic constant is due to the uncertainty of the pressure, temperature, and gas

composition measurement. The best method to determine the maximum and minimum possible variation

in the isentropic constant is to vary each of these parameters with each test point and determine the

isentropic constant for that particular condition. However, this can be very time consuming. Instead,

determine which test point had the highest uncertainty in the pressure, temperature, and gas composition,

and determine the maximum and minimum isentropic constants for this scenario. Calculate a percentage

of variation for this condition and apply it to the rest of the uncertainty calculations with isentropic

constants. This method will reduce the computations needed and yield a conservative uncertainty.

Table I-2. Defined and Calculated Values for Theoretical ICHP Uncertainty

Due to Pressure Uncertainty

Measured Minimum Maximum

ICHP ICHP ICHP

Discharge Pressure (psia) 992.66 994.71 990.61

Start

Expansion Line

K1 2332742 2313772 2323348

Suction Pressure (psia) 754.80 752.75 756.85

End

Suction Pressure (psia) 754.80 752.75 756.85

Start

Compression

Line

Discharge Pressure (psia) 992.66 994.71 990.61

End

Theoretical ICHP (HP) 239.85 236.80 242.80

NOTE: Bolded values were defined, and shaded values are calculated.

For this example, varying the pressure, temperature and gas composition yielded a maximum and

minimum isentropic constant of 1.3672 and 1.3539, respectively. This is a +0.53% and -0.45% variation.

Therefore, 0.5% will be used for the uncertainty of the isentropic constant. The defined and calculated

values for the theoretical ICHP due to variation in isentropic constant are shown in Table I-3. The

difference between the maximum and minimum theoretical ICHPs is 0.021 HP. This is less than 0.01%

of the theoretical horsepower and can be considered negligible. Unless there is a significant deviation in

pressure, temperature, or gas composition then the uncertainty due the isentropic constant can be ignored.

Speed

The uncertainty of the theoretical ICHP due to the uncertainty in the speed measurement is calculated

using the same methodology describe above in the Calculation of Measured ICHP Uncertainty section.

The work calculated from the integration of the theoretical ICHP diagram is 95,124 in-lbs. With a speed

uncertainty of 1 RPM, this gives a total uncertainty of 0.5 HP for the calculation of the theoretical ICHP.

Clearance Volume

The uncertainty of the clearance volume affects the start and end volumes for the PV diagram. Changing

these values will affect the curvature and end points of the expansion and compression lines. The

clearance volume is obtained from the manufacturer information on the compressor, a volume

measurement, or the effective clearance volume from the measured PV diagram. For this example, we

assume we have used the value from the manufacturer and that there is a 2% uncertainty. The defined

and calculated values for the theoretical ICHP due to uncertainty in clearance volume are shown in Table

I-4. The difference between the maximum and minimum theoretical ICHPs is 1.45 HP.

Table I-3. Defined and Calculated Values for Theoretical ICHP Uncertainty Due to Isentropic

Constant Uncertainty

Measured k Maximum k Minimum k

Isentropic Constant 1.36 1.3668 1.3532

Discharge Pressure (psia) 992.66 992.66 992.66

Start

Expansion Line

K1 2332742 2410241 2230367

Suction Pressure (psia) 754.80 754.80 754.80

End

Suction Pressure (psia) 754.80 754.80 754.80

Start

Compression

Line

Discharge Pressure (psia) 992.66 992.66 992.66

End

Theoretical ICHP (HP) 239.85 239.864 239.843

NOTE: Bolded values were defined, and shaded values are calculated

Table I-4. Defined and Calculated Values for Theoretical ICHP Uncertainty Due to Clearance

Volume Uncertainty

Measured CL% Maximum CL% Minimum CL%

Clearance Volume (in^3) 301.11 307.1322 295.0878

Discharge Pressure (psia) 992.66 992.66 992.66

Start

Expansion Line

K1 2332742 2381801 2255772

Suction Pressure (psia) 754.80 754.80 754.80

End

Suction Pressure (psia) 754.80 754.80 754.80

Start

Compression

Line

Discharge Pressure (psia) 992.66 992.66 992.66

End

Theoretical ICHP (HP) 239.85 239.13 240.58

NOTE: Bolded values were defined, and shaded values are calculated

Once the uncertainty due to each measured parameter is determined, the total uncertainty for the

theoretical ICHP can be determined. This value is found by calculating the root mean sum of all the

uncertainties (Equation I-8). This calculation is shown in Table I-5. This shows the total uncertainty for

the theoretical ICHP for this cylinder end is 6.19 HP or 2.58%.

Table I-5. Calculation of Total Uncertainty of Measured ICHP for Cylinder End

Parameter Uncertainty (HP) Square of Uncertainty (HP2)

Pressure 6 36

Isentropic Constant 0.021 0.000441

Speed 0.5 0.25

Clearance Volume 1.45 2.1025

Sum of Squares 38.35

Square Root of Sum 6.19 HP

The uncertainty of the efficiency can be calculated for each parameter (pressure, piston position, etc.) as

completed above for the ICHP; however, the tester is more interested in an overall uncertainty of the

efficiency for the cylinder end. In order to reduce the effort required to find the efficiency uncertainty,

the equations listed below (also shown in Appendix E) can be used to calculate it with the measured and

theoretical ICHP uncertainties calculated above.

cyl ,max =

ICHPcyl ICHPcyl

(I-9)

cyl ,min =

ICHPcyl + ICHPcyl

(I-10)

(I-11)

The uncertainty of the efficiency for the cylinder end being evaluated in this example is calculated below.

The total uncertainty of the calculated efficiency is 9.5 efficiency points or 12.4% of the efficiency

(76.9%).

Example

Pcyl ,isen = 6.19 HP

ICHPcyl = 312.0 HP

ICHPcyl = 11.8 HP

229.85 HP + 6.19 HP

cyl ,max =

312.0 HP 11.8 HP

cyl ,max = 78.6%

229.85 HP 6.19 HP

cyl ,min =

312.0 HP + 11.8 HP

cyl ,min = 69.1%

cyl = 9.5%

This page is intentionally left blank.

APPENDIX J

PERFORMANCE TESTING

This page is intentionally left blank.

APPENDIX J

Datasheets are shown on the next pages. They are labeled as General, PV Card, and Enthalpy Rise. The

sheets labeled as general apply to both the PV Card and Enthalpy Rise methods. The other datasheets

only apply to either the PV Card or Enthalpy Rise methods.

Datasheet for Compressor Performance Test - General 1

Date: _____________________ Test No: Units

Time

Cylinder ID

Service or Stage

HE Pocket Number(s)*Open

HE Valve(s) Lifted (Yes or No)

CE Pocket Number(s)*Open

CE Valve(s) Lifted (Yes or No)

Suction Gas Pressure

Suction Gas Temperature

Suction Nozzle Pressure

Suction Nozzle Temperature

Discharge Nozzle Pressure

Discharge Nozzle Temperature

Discharge Gas Pressure

Discharge Gas Temperature

Compressor RPM

Static Pressure

Temperature

Static P

Dynamic P

Orifice Coefficient

Barometric Pressure

Volume Flow

Fuel Meter

Static Pressure

Temperature

Static P

Dynamic P

Orifice Coefficient

Barometric Pressure

Volume Flow

Datasheet for Compressor Performance Test - General 2

Date: _____________________ Test No:

Time: _____________________

Driver Units

Current

Voltage

Power Factor

Motor Mechanical Efficiency

Oxygen

Hydrogen

Water

Hydrogen Sulfide

Nitrogen

Ammonia

Carbon Monoxide

Carbon Dioxide

Methane

Ethane

Propane

N-Butane

Iso-Butane

N-Pentane

Iso-Pentane

Neo-Pentane

N-Hexane

Iso - Hexane

Other: ___________________

Other: ___________________

Other: ___________________

Other: ___________________

Other: ___________________

Other: ___________________

Other: ___________________

Datasheet for Compressor Performance Test - General 3

Date: _____________________ Test No:

Cylinder Cooling

Flow Meter Units

Static Pressure

Temperature

Static P

Dynamic P

Orifice Coefficient

Barometric Pressure

Volume Flow

Inlet Temperature

Outlet Temperature

Calculated Values

Cylinder Cooling

Mass Flow Rate (mcool)

Heat Flux (qcool)

Driver

Low Heating Value of Fuel (LHV)

Fuel Mass Flow Rate (mfuel)

Power Input (Pin)

Efficiencies

Driver Efficiency ( e)

System Efficiency ( sys)

Datasheet for Compressor Performance Test - PV Card 1

Date: __________________________ Test No: RPM:

Cylinder ID Units

Bore Diameter

Stroke

Rod Diameter

Rod Length

Fixed Clearance Volume

Pocket 1 Volume

Pocket 2 Volume

Pocket 3 Volume

Pocket 4 Volume

Valve Lifters (Number)

Fixed Clearance Volume

Pocket 1 Volume

Pocket 2 Volume

Pocket 3 Volume

Pocket 4 Volume

Valve Lifters (Number)

Length

Diameter

Compression

Tension

Single Acting HE (CE Valve Lifted)

Single Acting CE (HE Valve Lifted)

Datasheet for Compressor Performance Test - PV Card 2

Date: _____________________ Test No:

Cylinder ID Units

Calculated Values

Head End

Indicated Compressor Horsepower

(ICHP)

Brake Horsepower (BHP)

Suction Volumetric Efficiency (EVs)

Discharge Volumetric Efficiency (EVd)

Suction Gas Compressibility (Zs)

Discharge Gas Compressibility (Zd)

Capacity (Q)

Isentropic Power (from theoretical PV

diagram)(Pisen)

Isentropic Efficiency ( isen)

Crank End

Indicated Compressor Horsepower

(ICHP)

Brake Horsepower (BHP)

Suction Volumetric Efficiency (EVs)

Discharge Volumetric Efficiency (EVd)

Suction Gas Compressibility (Zs)

Discharge Gas Compressibility (Zd)

Capacity (Q)

Isentropic Power (from theoretical PV

diagram)(Pisen)

Isentropic Efficiency ( isen)

Full Compressor

Indicated Compressor Horsepower

(ICHP)

Isentropic Efficiency ( isen)

Capacity (Q)

Datasheet for Compressor Performance Test - Enthalpy Rise 1

Date: _____________________ Test No:

Cylinder ID Units

Calculated Values

Cylinders

Actual Suction Enthalpy (hs)

Actual Discharge Enthalpy (hd)

Theoretical Suction Enthalpy (hs)

Theoretical Discharge Enthalpy (hd,isen)

Actual Enthalpy Difference (H)

Theoretical Enthalpy Difference (Hisen)

Isentropic Efficiency ( isen,cyl)

Capacity (Q)

Mass Flow Rate (mcyl)

Actual Power (Pcyl)

Full Compressor

Actual Suction Enthalpy (hs)

Actual Discharge Enthalpy (hd)

Theoretical Suction Enthalpy (hs)

Theoretical Discharge Enthalpy (hd,isen)

Actual Enthalpy Difference (H)

Theoretical Enthalpy Difference (Hisen)

Isentropic Efficiency ( isen,cyl)

Capacity (Q)

Mass Flow Rate (mcyl)

Actual Power (Pcyl)

- Compressor Power Estimation CalcsCaricato datedfdfe
- Reciprocating Compresor TrainingCaricato daManuel Quimson
- Acoustic Induced VibrationCaricato daEugene Jin Leow
- Lab 2 Report thermodynamicsCaricato daOse Colix Jr.
- Methods for Large Reciprocating Compressor Capacity ControlCaricato damario_g
- EMCCaricato daAditya Gurunathan
- Thermodynamics_I_P_12.pdfCaricato da黃羿傑
- Copy of Compressor SizeCaricato daSubhash Kumar
- racqb_2Caricato daratchagaraja
- Cylinder Replacement Instructional GuideCaricato daMike
- compressor specificationCaricato dasabill arasyid
- Ro Tech Booster 0312Caricato daLuis Vilela
- RAS GAS 2 (1)Caricato daM Ahmed Latif
- P-8931_LaserStar_1530_09-17-04Caricato datakenoveraccount
- Centrifugal vs reciprocating compressor _ Turbomachinery Magazine.pdfCaricato daReyes Sanchez
- Work done in open cycleCaricato daDhruva Patil
- Acid Gas DehydrationCaricato daAnonymous cCIP7W
- Compressor Unit Relative EfficiencyCaricato daLTE002
- Centrifugal vs reciprocating compressor _ Turbomachinery Magazine.pdfCaricato daReyes Sanchez
- JNTUK-DAP-Course Structure and Syllabus-B.tech(Mechanical Engineering) -II YEAR.R10 StudentsCaricato daAnusha Mylavarapu
- CompressorCaricato daMohammed Ashique
- VcrCaricato dagudursrinath11
- Vorecon_applications.pdfCaricato dalancasa
- Tutorial Depressuring 5Caricato daToyin
- 15. Forbes Marshall Energy Saving Opp in Aluminium Sector...Master Air ControllerCaricato daSiva Sankara Narayanan Subramanian
- Mesin Bor Explorac R50Caricato dajulianusginting00
- Refrigeration Lecture 1Caricato daAkBar
- Rotary CompressorCaricato daEzhil Arasu
- Compressed Air eBookCaricato daJuan Manuel Hervés
- 2002AP4Caricato dapapaki2

- Bearing failures and their causes. Fallas en Rodamientos y Sus Causas SKF (en Inglés)Caricato daTeckelino
- guitar-chords-ebook.pdfCaricato dabottom2x
- chords-intervals-construction.pdfCaricato darootant123
- circle of fifths guitar.pdfCaricato daJose Prado
- Overlapped FFT ProcessingCaricato davandalashah
- 84 Guitar Scales and Arpeggios Patterns - FaChords Guitar SoftwareCaricato dafaco1976
- The Beginner's Guide to Jazz GuitarCaricato dalouminn
- Learning the ModesCaricato daJose Prado
- 17-Essential-Strum-Patterns-Cheat-Sheet.pdfCaricato daJose Prado
- Rotating Machine Fault Diagnostics Using VibrationCaricato daJose Prado
- Condition Monitoring of Centrifugal Blower Using Vibration Analysis.pdfCaricato daJose Prado
- the art of gear fabrication.pdfCaricato daJose Prado
- Waveform DigitizersCaricato daJose Prado
- APPRECIATING THE JAPANESE SWORD.pdfCaricato daJose Prado
- Japanese SwordsCaricato daJose Prado
- 15144958Caricato daAlwin James
- Fault Detection of Electrical Motors Based on Vibration AnalysisCaricato daJose Prado
- Modelling and Analysis of BladeCaricato daJose Prado
- Steam Turbine Blade Failures .pdfCaricato daJose Prado
- 15 YEARS LATER: ON THE PHYSICS OF HIGH-RISE BUILDING COLLAPSESCaricato darawo
- An Investigation of Shaft Current in a Large Sleeve Bearing Induction MachineCaricato daJose Prado
- Motor Bearing Current PhenomenonCaricato daJose Prado
- electrically-induced-bearing-damage-and-shaft-currents.pdfCaricato daJose Prado
- FULL SPECTRUMS AND OTHER VIBRATION TWO-DIMENSIONACaricato daTecnicas Predictivas Sac
- Remote Experimental Vibration Analysis of Mechanical Structures Over the InternetCaricato daJose Prado
- Time-Frequency Analysis of Shock and Vibration MeasurementsCaricato daJose Prado
- Implementation of the Vold-kalman Order Tracking FiltersCaricato daJose Prado

- Turgo InstallCaricato daSchalekis George
- sf-11-sect-08-012-016Caricato dajtpml
- Resistance GroundingCaricato dajawad_13
- Catalogue Safering_safeplus 40_5kv 1vdd006114 (Ver 2011)Caricato dazhang881907
- Loto Cl(Ht-lt Swgr,u#2)Caricato daNilamani Umashankar Jena
- 2CSC401001B0202Caricato daDouglas Fernando
- Optimizing Circuit Breaker White paperCaricato dabogdanm67
- 5003-5008Caricato daja02mv
- Powerplant Technical Vocabulary Textbook CompletedCaricato dajawadhussain1
- 3RV2011-1AA15Caricato daDenis Filipović
- district heatingCaricato darpercor
- 1-Power System Operation and Control, SCADACaricato daSamiul Kadir
- tutorial2_solution.pdfCaricato daBiju
- LS Product ProfileCaricato dapavithra27
- Electrical Marine Rules ComparisonCaricato daAllAmericanMarine
- 14 Motor Soft StarterCaricato daInsam Fernando
- Duke-Energy-Carolinas,-LLC-Power-Manager-Load-Control-Service-RiderCaricato daGenability
- Pakistan Energy 2035-FINAL 20th October 2014Caricato dahashimhasnainhadi
- Lect 6 Distribution Substation DesignCaricato daMohammad Haseeb Butt
- SIN6180 White ListCaricato daAhmed Ismail
- Electrical SafetyCaricato dathibin
- Operation Manual - 1Caricato daG Eda Satish
- Minutes of 89th OCCMCaricato daAmaresh Mallick
- powerbank16000-en.pdfCaricato daArian Mareș
- 1-s2.0-S1364032118303903-mainCaricato damanu_arje
- EMIICaricato daAmmu Puni
- experimentCaricato daMaimaiFabilonaDumalaog
- A REVIEW OF THE ENERGY SITUATION IN UGANDACaricato daIJSRP ORG
- Capacitor MotorCaricato daHaziq Shukor
- Duke Energy Coal AllocationCaricato daS Saha

## Molto più che documenti.

Scopri tutto ciò che Scribd ha da offrire, inclusi libri e audiolibri dei maggiori editori.

Annulla in qualsiasi momento.