Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
The parties jointly move the Court for a 30-day extension of all pending deadlines to allow
new leadership personnel at the Department of Health and Human Services to more fully consider
the issues raised in this case and determine how best to proceed. In support of this motion, the
1. Plaintiffs challenge a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) rule that deems
cigars to be tobacco products subject to FDA regulation. See FDA, Deeming Tobacco Products
To Be Subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as Amended by the Family Smoking
Prevention and Tobacco Control Act; Restrictions on the Sale and Distribution of Tobacco
1
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d), Dr. Thomas Price and Dr. Stephen Ostroff are substituted for
their predecessors in office.
Case 1:16-cv-01460-APM Document 27 Filed 03/21/17 Page 2 of 3
Products and Required Warning Statements for Tobacco Products, No. FDA-2014-N-0189, 81
2. Plaintiffs filed their motion for summary judgment on February 13, 2017. See ECF
No. 22. Under the current briefing schedule, Defendants opposition and cross-motion are due on
March 30; Plaintiffs reply and opposition are due on May 15; and Defendants reply is due on
June 14. See ECF No. 17. Oral argument is currently scheduled for July 28. See id.
Department of Health and Human Services seek additional time to more fully consider the issues
raised in this case and determine how best to proceed, and therefore respectfully request a 30-day
which the parties were unable to agree. See ECF No. 26. After conferring further, the parties have
agreed to and jointly request the 30-day extension sought here. Accordingly, Defendants
5. Plaintiffs note that they are concerned about certain compliance deadlines under the
Final Rule at issue, which they took into consideration in agreeing to the current briefing schedule.
Thus, while Plaintiffs have agreed to a 30-day extension to accommodate Defendants, they have
informed Defendants that they will not consent to any further extension of the litigation deadlines
WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that the Court grant a 30-day extension of
2
Case 1:16-cv-01460-APM Document 27 Filed 03/21/17 Page 3 of 3
3
Case 1:16-cv-01460-APM Document 27-1 Filed 03/21/17 Page 1 of 2
Plaintiffs,
Defendants.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Upon consideration of the parties joint motion to amend the scheduling order, it is hereby
FURTHER ORDERED that the [17] scheduling order in this case is amended as follows:
Briefs of any amici granted leave to file in support of Defendants shall be filed by:
May 8, 2017
Plaintiffs reply in support of its motion for summary judgment and opposition to
Defendants cross-motion for summary judgment shall be filed by: June 14, 2017
Defendants reply in support of their cross-motion for summary judgment shall be filed
by: July 14, 2017
1
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d), Dr. Thomas Price and Dr. Stephen Ostroff are substituted for
their predecessors in office.
Case 1:16-cv-01460-APM Document 27-1 Filed 03/21/17 Page 2 of 2
Plaintiffs shall file the appendix of excerpts of the administrative record by: July 28,
2017
Oral argument shall be rescheduled for a date and time that suits the Court.
SO ORDERED.