Andrew Hamilton, "Hitler as Orator" | Counter-Currents Publishing http://www.counter-currents.

com/2012/06/hitler-as-orator/

COUNTER-CURRENTS PUBLISHING
Books Against Time
Like 3.5k

HOME ABOUT NEWS N ORTH AMERICAN NEW RIGHT OUR T ITLES DISTRIBUTED T ITLES PODCASTS VIDEOS DONATE MAILING L IST CONTACT

Print this post

Hitler as Orator Kindle Subscription
Andrew Hamilton

3,006 words

Our Titles
I know that men are won over less by the
written than by the spoken word, that every
great movement on this earth owes its growth
to orators and not to great writers. Adolf
Hitler, Authors Preface, Mein Kampf
(James Murphy trans., 1939)

Houston Peterson, compiler of A Treasury of the

Worlds Great Speeches (1965), believed that
eloquent speech (oratory) originated deep in the
prehistoric past among men who cast spells over
their fellows with the magic of words. At first it was
not words so much as the rhythm, the sounds, the
incantation that was a part of ritual. Chiefs, Hitler practicing oratory by Heinrich
Hoffman
priests, medicine men, millenniums before the
heroes of Homer, must have risen to power
through skill in speech as well as skill in arms.

Adolf Hitler believed the magic of the spoken word was the primary propaganda
weapon. Historian David Irving called Hitlers power of elemental oratory his greatest
gift.

In the Beginning Was the Word

In 1941, Raoul de Roussy Sales, the compiler of a book of extracts of Hitlers

speeches, wrote, He is essentially a speechmaker, and although today it is his deeds
and his conquests that most impress the world, it should not be forgotten that he started
as a soap-box orator and spoke his way to power.

Post-WWI Germany suffered from disintegrative social and political tendencies.

Jews briefly succeeded in establishing embryonic Communist dictatorships, nearly

pitching the entire country into a totalitarian bloodbath of Russian-style proportions.
Historian John Toland described the German capital as without electricity, its trolley
cars and subways stopped, garbage rotting in the streets, and shops and offices
closed.

Only Berlins night life went on unimpeded, in darkness or candlelight. It was

corruption out of an overdone movie with heavily rouged girl prostitutes of eleven
competing with whip-toting Amazons in high lacquered boots. There were cafes for
every taste and perversionhomosexuals, lesbians, exhibitionists, sadists,
masochists. Nudity had become boring and art itself was plumbing the nadir of
obscenity, disillusionment and cynicism. (Adolf Hitler, 1976, p. 100)

1 of 14 9/10/2015 1:40 AM
Andrew Hamilton, "Hitler as Orator" | Counter-Currents Publishing http://www.counter-currents.com/2012/06/hitler-as-orator/

If I didnt live in the United States of America I might think he was exaggerating.

Upon joining the miniscule German Workers Party (DAP; Deutsche Arbeiterpartei) in
1919, Hitler quickly became its dominant figure and main speaker.

The first large meeting he addressed was held in the smoky basement of the
Hofbruhaus in Munich on October 16, 1919. There he spoke from behind a crude
lectern atop a table for half an hour to an audience of seventy.

According to biographer John Toland, Abandoning all restraint, he let emotion take
over and by the time he sat down to loud applause sweat covered his face. He was
exhausted but elated and what before I had simply felt deep down in my heart, without
being able to put it to the test, proved to be true; I could speak!' (quoting Mein Kampf).

Toland characterized this event as a turning point in Hitlers career and in the
historical trajectory of the German Workers Party, soon to be renamed the National
Socialist German Workers Party (NSDAP).

Hitler later wrote in the party newspaper the Vlkischer Beobachter, When I closed
the meeting, I was not alone in thinking that now a wolf had been born, destined to burst
in upon the herd of seducers of the people.

The name Adolf, derived from Old High German, literally meant noble wolf. From that
day forward wolf had a special meaning for him, as a nickname among close friends,
his pseudonym, and the name for most of his military headquarters.

A month later Hitler spoke to 130 students, shopkeepers, and army officers in another
Munich beer hall, the Eberlbru.

Inasmuch as the speech was only the unknown Hitlers second public address for the
tiny party, two points are worth noting.

First, a government spy was present. Incorrectly identifying Hitler as a merchant, he

reported that the orator held forth in an outstanding manner and was destined to
become a professional propaganda speaker.

Second, Jews, Leftists, and Communists were well-organized in advance to use

violence to suppress a speech targeting only 130 people, the content of which would
not be circulated to a larger audience via newspapers or magazines (the mass media
of the day). Their intention was to stop the meeting and intimidate the participants so
that even a tiny audience could not hear Hitlers message, knowing few would risk doing
so ever again.

This pattern persists today.

Currently, for example, World War II historian David Irving is in the midst of a speaking
tour of the US, one of the few remaining European countries where free speech has
not (yet) been formally outlawed as hate, terrorism, Holocaust denial, or
defaming the memory of the dead.

A few days ago he spoke to a handful of people at a hotel in Oklahoma City. Irving and
his listeners are forced to meet furtively in private, indeed, under conditions of utmost
secrecy, otherwise armed, Leftist antifa thugs who stalk the writer across the United
States will criminally break up the meetings.

Even so, elsewhere in the hotel that evening thirty men dressed in black with bandanas
and masks, wielding illegal weapons, stormed in, found a birthday party for a Dr.
Kunzs family, and mistakenly smashed into that. The crime, Irving says, was planned
and led by the owner of a Tulsa wholesale computer firm.

But these masked stalkers and domestic terrorists will receive little more than a slap on
the wrist from the System, if that. In essence, police, prosecutors, and courts smirk
about it, as they have done for more than half a century now.

There is no great mystery about why our race is in the peril its in. It is not a mysterious
puzzle. It is a lie to say that we did it to ourselves. The real reason is plain: violence,

2 of 14 9/10/2015 1:40 AM
Andrew Hamilton, "Hitler as Orator" | Counter-Currents Publishing http://www.counter-currents.com/2012/06/hitler-as-orator/

hatred, force, power, and government-approved criminality designed to suppress civil

liberties.

But at the Eberlbru in 1919, Hitler had alerted his military contingent in advance, and
within minutes after hecklers began interrupting, the Leftists flew down the stairs with
gashed heads. (Mein Kampf )

After a few more meetings speaking to similar-sized crowds, Hitler insisted that the
German Workers Party transform itself from a small ideological discussion and writing
group into a true political party.

During the final days of December 1919 he and party founder Anton Drexler drafted a
25-point program that Hitler presented to the public for ratification.

This important meeting took place on February 24, 1920 in the Festsaal, or Festival
Room, of Munichs Hofbruhaus, a great hall on the third floor jammed with hundreds of
people.

Festival Hall, Hofbruhaus, Munich, today

Hitler was particularly pleased that more than half the crowd consisted of Communists
or Independent Socialist Party members. He was convinced he could win over the true
idealists among them while making short work of the hard core disruptors.

Unaccustomed to speaking to such a large audience, his voice was loud one moment
and weak the next. But he spoke so simply and clearly that even those at the farthest
tables could hear him.

Hitler began quietly, outlining the history of the previous ten years. But as his narrative
reached the post-WWI Communist revolutions, his eyes flashed, passion crept into his
voice, and he began to gesture.

Soon, angry shouts erupted from all corners of the great hall as thugs hurled heavy
beer mugs at Hitler. Immediately his army supporters, forerunners of the SA, armed
with whips and rubber truncheons, sprang into action, hustling the troublemakers
outside.

Throughout 1920, at weekly or two-week intervals, Hitler continued to deliver speeches

in Munich beer halls. Summaries of many of these speeches survive in lengthy secret
police reports which contain accurate head counts. The audiences ranged in size from
1,200 to 3,500 people.

According to hostile German

biographer Joachim Fest, by 1922 he
began holding series of eight, ten, or

3 of 14 9/10/2015 1:40 AM
Andrew Hamilton, "Hitler as Orator" | Counter-Currents Publishing http://www.counter-currents.com/2012/06/hitler-as-orator/

twelve rallies on a single evening, at

each of which he would appear as the
principal speaker. (Hitler, 1973, p.
158) Though these numbers seem
difficult to credit, they are what Fest
reports.

On August 16, 1922 Hitler addressed his largest audience to date, a crowd of 40,000
in Munichs great central square.

By Hitlers own account, it took him two full years of hectic speaking to perfect his craft
and become master of the art of oratory.

He could speak with spellbinding force both extemporaneously and from personally
drafted scripts that he revised two, three, four, or even five times late into the night,
occupying three secretaries taking dictation directly onto typewriters.

Like many expert public speakers,

Hitler practiced tirelessly. He carefully
rehearsed gestures, often in front of a
mirror, designed to generate particular
responses from his audiences.

He also experimented with his own

image, asking his personal
photographer Heinrich Hoffmann to
take photographs for him to review.
Then hed examine them, deciding, No, that looks silly or Im never going to do that
again.

A handful of these photos exist showing Hitler practicing gestures to one of his
speeches. He never intended for them to be published.

The Crowd

A psychic and emotional synthesis occurs between orators and their listeners. The
orators stream of speech fuses individual members of the audience into Gustave Le
Bons crowd. It is this crowd that the orator actually interacts with.

Hitler was an actor of prodigious talents who could raise the temperature of the
audience to flash-point, and at this point they were no longer separate individuals; they
were all fused into the mass. (Robert Payne, The Life and Death of Adolf Hitler, 1973,
p. 156) The bigger the audience, the easier it was to manipulate it in such a manner.

Hitler paid close attention to his audiences.

At the time, Communism, socialism, and the class struggle were fundamental to political
discourse everywhere.

So, in his early days, Hitlers primary appeal was to the working and lower middle
classes. He actively discouraged attendance or participation by the middle class (the
bourgeoisie).

The political attitude of that class is marked by the sign of cowardice. It exclusively
concerns itself with order and tranquility. [He might better have said conformity and
Distributed Titles
blind obedience to authority.] I aimed, instead, to awaken the enthusiasm of the
working-class world to my ideas. (Table Talk, April 8, 1942.)

Contempt for the middle class was a recurring theme in Hitlers writing, thinking, and
private remarks.

The trappings of his meetings were carefully calculated to exert certain effects upon
the audience.

Hitler personally tested the acoustics of the important Munich meeting halls,
determining the best places to stand, how loudly or softly he could speak and still be

4 of 14 9/10/2015 1:40 AM
Andrew Hamilton, "Hitler as Orator" | Counter-Currents Publishing http://www.counter-currents.com/2012/06/hitler-as-orator/

heard, the atmosphere, ventilation, and tactical layout of the rooms.

Detailed party guidelines were drawn up pertaining to such matters, specifying among
other things that a hall should always be too small, and that a third of the audience
should consist of party followers.

The atmosphere in the hallsimpressively adorned with dramatic red, white and black
swastika bannerswas made genial with free beer, sausages, pretzels, folk singing,
and music.

Such measures created receptive listeners.

At the appropriate psychological moment, Hitler would make a dramatic entrance

sometimes late, to intensify anticipation. He would silently survey the audience for a
full minute or more before beginning to speak, further heightening tension.

After hed carefully gauged the mood of the crowd he started talking slowly and quietly,
feeling out the audience the way an actor would, adapting his manner and speech to its
needs, building emotion slowly. People sat motionless, eyes riveted upon him.

He possessed an actors ability to suddenly throw on the extra generators and become
absolutely charged with energy. Before the end of his talk he had roused the people to
a pitch of almost uncontrollable excitement.

Organized anti-white opposition, including loud heckling, hurling of heavy beer mugs
stockpiled under tables as weapons, and the use of table and chair legs as clubs to
beat pro-German speakers and attendees, was frequent.

Hitler handled this life-and-death problem for the movement by forming a protective
service and, whenever possible, roughly chucking disruptors unceremoniously from the
hall.

At a November 4, 1921 speech at the Hofbruhaus, there were about 700 Communists
in a crowd of 2,200. At a prearranged signal they attacked with fists, a hail of flying beer
mugs, and chair legs. After a fierce hand-to-hand battle, Hitlers 42 security men
expelled all 700 of them from the hall, which looked as if it had been hit by a bomb.

The meeting organizer then leaped onto a table, shouting, The meeting continues! The
speaker has the floor!

Hermann Otto Hoyer, "In the Beginning was the Word"

The result of this process seems to have been a sort of culling or winnowing. Hitler was
not simply speaking to the choir. In contrast to the tens of thousands who came to the
mass meetings, at the beginning of 1922 there were still only 6,000 registered party
members.

5 of 14 9/10/2015 1:40 AM
Andrew Hamilton, "Hitler as Orator" | Counter-Currents Publishing http://www.counter-currents.com/2012/06/hitler-as-orator/

Many Communists and socialists unsympathetic to the movement remained. But the
organized hardcore were physically ejected as soon as they began disrupting
proceedings.

The remaining Leftists were often hostile and continued heckling. But Hitler drew
energy from such public hostilitythe very social rejection that causes most whites to
shrink in fear. His powerful oratory ultimately won many Leftists to his side.

Hitler also sent his own people to enroll in courses in public speaking at schools
organized by opposition groups. Thanks to this, he said, we obtained a good insight
into the arguments which would be used by those sent to heckle at our meetings, and
we were thus in a position to silence them the moment they opened their mouths.
(Table Talk, April 8, 1942)

He scattered party members throughout his audiences with orders to interrupt his
speeches along prearranged lines to suggest spontaneous public (group) approval,
and these interruptions greatly strengthened the force of my own arguments. (Table
Talk, April 8, 1942)

By way of analogy, consider laugh tracks on TV, or the carefully-rehearsed tone of

voice and facial expressions used by newscasters to elicit specific instinctive reactions
of approval or disapproval from the passive viewing audience.

Impassioned Oratory

Early on, Hitler attended the meetings of his main rivals to study their techniques. His
critical judgment was that the speakers delivered their speeches in the style of a witty
newspaper article or of a scientific treatise, avoided all strong words, and here and
there threw in some feeble professional joke. (Mein Kampf)

Hitler, in contrast, spoke with a primitive force and unabashed emotion that set him
apart from intellectuals who appealed to reason. Underlying his rhetorical theory was
the Ciceronian maxim that man is moved more by passion than by reason.

Hitler was a daring and original speaker, according to biographer Joachim Fest. His
courage in voicing forbidden opinions was extraordinary. Precisely that gave him the
aura of manliness, of fierceness, and sovereign contempt, which befitted the image of
the Great Leader. (Hitler, 1973, p. 159)

They say were a bunch of anti-Semitic rowdies, Hitler proclaimed in one speech. So
we are, we want to stir up a storm! We dont want people to sleep, but to know a
thunderstorm is brewing!

Oratory is characterized by a gravitational force extending beyond the ideas expressed

or the specific words used to articulate them.

Of Hitler it has been said, It wasnt as though he were using words, it was as though
the emotions came direct without words. There was a rawness about it, a power. (The
Fatal Attraction of Hitler, BBC TV, 1989) Such speeches are, in a sense, a form of
magical art.

Perhaps that is why one reader of translations of portions of Hitlers speeches said
that it was like reading lyrics from songs without the music.

Fest described religious-style awakenings and conversions experienced by his

listeners.

Kurt Luedecke, a 32-year-old businessman who later became a leading member of

Hitlers entourage, described the spell cast by Hitlers oratory: The intense will of the
man, the passion of his sincerity seemed to flow from him into me. I experienced an
exaltation that could be likened only to religious conversion. (Fest, p. 162)

On Hitlers part, the violent physical effort required for speaking engendered profuse
perspiration and even weight loss.

His half-German, half-American WASP foreign press secretary Ernst Putzi

6 of 14 9/10/2015 1:40 AM
Andrew Hamilton, "Hitler as Orator" | Counter-Currents Publishing http://www.counter-currents.com/2012/06/hitler-as-orator/

Hanfstaengl recalled his first meeting with Hitler after one such speech. Hitlers
exhaustion resembled that of a great artist at the end of a grueling concert; his face
and hair were soaked and his starched collar wilted.

Hitler himself said,

Whenever I have to make a speech of great importance I am always soaking wet

at the end, and I find I have lost four or six pounds in weight. And in Bavaria
[southern Germany, including Munich, his initial political base during the early years
discussed here], where, in addition to my usual mineral water, local custom insists
that I drink two or three bottles of beer, I lose as much as eight pounds. (Table
Talk, July 8, 1942)

As Scottish philosopher David Hume noted in his essay Of Eloquence (1742), great
oratory entails unleashing restraints and taking great risksletting goin front of an
audience. The speaker taps into something deep and true within, and lets it explode.

Hitler did this. As Egon Hanfstaengl, son of Ernst, who had known Hitler intimately when
he was a little boy in Germany in the early 1920s, explained in 1989,

He had that ability which is needed to make people stop thinking critically and just
emote. The ability derived from his readiness to throw himself totally open, to
appear as it were bare and naked before his audience, to tear open his heart and
display it. (Interview in The Fatal Attraction of Hitler)

Selected Sources

The Fatal Attraction of Hitler, BBC TV documentary, 1989.

Joachim C. Fest, Hitler, trans. from German by Richard and Clara Winston (New York:
Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1973).

Robert Payne, The Life and Death of Adolf Hitler (New York: Praeger, 1973; pbk.,
Popular Library, 1973). References to the paperback edition.

Table Talk. References to the paperback edition of Hitlers Secret Conversations,

19411944 (New York: Farrar, Straus and Young, 1953; pbk., New York: Signet Books,
1961).

John Toland, Adolf Hitler (Garden City, New York: Doubleday, 1976).

Related

7 of 14 9/10/2015 1:40 AM
Andrew Hamilton, "Hitler as Orator" | Counter-Currents Publishing http://www.counter-currents.com/2012/06/hitler-as-orator/

If you enjoyed this piece, and wish to encourage more

like it, give a tip through Paypal. You can earmark your
tip directly to the author or translator, or you can put it
in a general fund. (Be sure to specify which in the "Add
special instructions to seller" box at Paypal.)

Tweet 1
Published: June 1, 2012 | This entry was posted in North American New Right and tagged Adolf
Hitler, Andrew Hamilton, articles, North American New Right, oratory, originals, rhetoric. Post
a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
La Haute Culture Surhumaniste: The Leader of the Tribe
lavenir de lOccident Queen Elizabeths Diamond Jubilee

8 Comments

1. Kudzu Bob
Posted June 1, 2012 at 6:45 pm | Permalink

If memory serves, it has been pointed out that Hitlers usual style of oratory would
have been too hot (in McLuhans sense) for the cool medium of television. One
wonders if he would have been able to adapt to that technology; I suspect that he
would have.

Reply

2. Deviance
Posted June 1, 2012 at 9:26 pm | Permalink

An interesting anecdote, that Andrew Hamilton should have mentioned in his piece:
Hitler, when confronted by a woman during a meeting, never attempted to argue
with her, instead resorting to ridiculing and shaming tactics. With tremendous
effectiveness.

There is no great mystery about why our race is in the peril its in. It is
not a mysterious puzzle. It is a lie to say that we did it to ourselves.
The real reason is plain: violence, hatred, force, power, and
government-approved criminality designed to suppress civil liberties.

Just like criticism of nazism, the phrase we did it to ourselves must be analysed
cautiously, because though it can be legitimate, it hides far more often intellectual
mediocrity and lack of historical culture.

When a proponent of this thesis does not outright negate the Jewish factor, or the
consequences of World War Two on pro-White politics, he will often say that White
people are too xenophile/too altruist/too naive/too idiotic, a very vague notion
which notably ignores the separation between the elites and the masses.

The masses, in any race, any country, are irrelevant. History has shown enough times
that you can change their minds at will. If you have access to a powerful propaganda
medium, you can transform Pakistan into a Buddhist country, or the United States
into a national-socialist country. It will take years, of course, but you can.

There is therefore no innate xenophilia or philo-Semitism in White people. Only the

consequence of propaganda, of the established order and of the Zeitgeist. All of this
comes, in a perfect pyramidal order, from the elites.

White peoples problem is that their elites have become hostile. This is the only one.
They did not kill themselves, their elites killed them. And an element of
explanation is that these elites have become foreign. Whose fault is it? Perhaps
nobodys, just a cruel joke from Mother Nature.

Reply

8 of 14 9/10/2015 1:40 AM
Andrew Hamilton, "Hitler as Orator" | Counter-Currents Publishing http://www.counter-currents.com/2012/06/hitler-as-orator/

Posted June 2, 2012 at 7:41 am | Permalink

Just like criticism of nazism, the phrase we did it to ourselves must be

analysed cautiously, because though it can be legitimate, it hides far more
often intellectual mediocrity and lack of historical culture.

I agree, the whole its our own fault is often a cop-out. As for criticism of
Nazism, my dislike is more aimed at the actual Third Reich than the theories
and philosophy of Nazism (which I often find myself agreeing with).

There is therefore no innate xenophilia or philo-Semitism in White people.

I wouldnt say that White people have an innate xenophilia, but rather a
greater sense of altruism and compassion, which makes Whites more
vulnerable to xenophilia than other races. I suppose it has to do with the Ice
Age and evolutionary factors that made empathy into an advantage. Still,
youre right that humans are herd animals and its the ruling minority which
is decisive; it can swing the masses in either a racist or anti-racist direction.

White peoples problem is that their elites have become hostile. This is the only
one. They did not kill themselves, their elites killed them.

But the elites are largely a product of their people and society, arent they?

Reply

Franklin Ryckaert
Posted June 2, 2012 at 1:37 pm | Permalink

The masses, in any race, any country are irrelevant.

That is indeed mostly the case. Masses are led by their elite and they will
simply believe anything the elite teaches them.

There are however cases where the reverse is true. Think of how Christianity
spread in the Roman Empire, not by the teaching by the elite but by the
masses themselves. The elite (emperor Constantin) only adopted the popular
religion when that seemed oportune. So in this case a development from
below to above.

As for the hostile elite in the West, that consists mostly of unscrupulous,
corrupt individuals controlled by Jews, who form the real elite behind the
elite.
This toxic combination however could not exist had the Western peoples not
in their psychological make-up some qualities that could be exploited (mainly
: altruism and universalism).

Tanja : But the elites are largely a product of their society, arent they?

Normally, yes, but the West isnt normal anymore. Power has been hi-jacked
by Jews and they select as their collaborators only criminals who dont
represent us.

Reply

Sandy
Posted June 2, 2012 at 4:34 pm | Permalink

Deviance, I wouldnt say that White peoples problem is that their elites have
become hostile but rather that our elites have been replaced by a new elite.
Our old elite based on blood and rank has been pushed out by the new monied
class. The big shove seems to have occurred during the Reformation.

Tanja queries that the elites are largely a product of their people and society,
which should be true but as we look at our visible elites today well studied
by MacDonald they neither appear to be of our people or our society.

Nothing sadder than a body without a head and as long as our Lords
Spiritual dwell on Emotional-Christianity at the expense of Political-
Christianity I dont see much hope.

9 of 14 9/10/2015 1:40 AM
Andrew Hamilton, "Hitler as Orator" | Counter-Currents Publishing http://www.counter-currents.com/2012/06/hitler-as-orator/

3. Ulf Larsen
Posted June 2, 2012 at 12:58 am | Permalink

A great series of essays, Andrew Hamilton.

Apropos the difference between an orator and a public speaker: apparently David
Bowie has said that Hitler was the first rock star. There is some truth in that. His
speeches probably had more in common with a rock show than with any modern
politicial speech:

Reply

4. Vick
Posted June 2, 2012 at 9:14 am | Permalink

Another fascinating article on Hitlers speeches. It includes a lot of great details

about another aspect of Hitlers that fascinates me his very early history in
Munich. Thanks Mr Hamilton.

Reply

muroc29
Posted June 5, 2012 at 10:15 am | Permalink

Theres no better book on that subject than Charles Floods Hitler: the Path
to Power, easily one of the most enthralling works of history Ive ever read.

Reply

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.

Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved,
it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.

Required fields are marked *

Name *

Email *

10 of 14 9/10/2015 1:40 AM
Andrew Hamilton, "Hitler as Orator" | Counter-Currents Publishing http://www.counter-currents.com/2012/06/hitler-as-orator/

Comment

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym
title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite="">
<s> <strike> <strong>

Click the "Preview" button to preview your comment here.

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

Notify me of follow-up comments by email.

Notify me of new posts by email.

11 of 14 9/10/2015 1:40 AM
Andrew Hamilton, "Hitler as Orator" | Counter-Currents Publishing http://www.counter-currents.com/2012/06/hitler-as-orator/

12 of 14 9/10/2015 1:40 AM
Andrew Hamilton, "Hitler as Orator" | Counter-Currents Publishing http://www.counter-currents.com/2012/06/hitler-as-orator/

13 of 14 9/10/2015 1:40 AM
Andrew Hamilton, "Hitler as Orator" | Counter-Currents Publishing http://www.counter-currents.com/2012/06/hitler-as-orator/

14 of 14 9/10/2015 1:40 AM