Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
PICTURE
FIGURE 9.3
Decoding: A Challenging Process
Although the police officer appears to be encoding the directions very clearly, the man to
whom he is speaking does not appear to be getting the message. In other words, he is not
decoding the message well. This might occur because the man is so unfamiliar with the
neighborhood that he cannot accurately figure out exactly what the police officer means.
Such problems occur widely in organizations, leading to obvious problems.
Noise. Despite the apparent simplicity of the communication process, it rarely operates
flawlessly as we have described it here. As we will see, there are many potential barriers to
effective communication. The name given to factors that distort the clarity of a message is
noise. As we have shown in Figure 9.2, noise can occur at any point along to the
communication process. For example, messages that are poorly encoded (e.g., written in an
unclear way) or poorly decoded (e.g., not comprehended), or channels of communication that
are too full of static (e receivers' attentions are diverted from the message) may reduce
communication's effectiveness.
One particularly annoying source of noise in e-mail communication these days is spam,
unsolicited commercial bulk e-mail messages (see figure 9.4). The statistics are shocking:
Approximately 206 billion junk e-mailings were estimated to have in 2006 (1,400 per
consumer), doubling from 2005.
The annual cost of spam to U.S. corporations is $8.9 billion $2.5 billion for European
businesses.
Approximately 80 percent of e-mail messages received are considered spam, and
despite efforts to stop it, the figure is rising rapidly.
Given these figures, it's not surprising that spam, a modern form of noise, contributes greatly
to the inefficiency of e-mail system-bogging them down with unwanted information, making
it difficult to search for desired messages, and often exposing people to distasteful material.
Not only spam, but a variety of factors (e.g., e pressure, organizational politics) contribute to
the distortion of information transmitted from one party to another and to the resulting
complexity of the communication process. As you continue reading this chapter you will
come to appreciate many of the factors that make the process of organizational
communication so very complex and important.
PICTURE
FIGURE 9.5
Media Richness Theory
Verbal communication media may be characterized along a continuum ranging from highly
rich interactive media, such as face-to-face discussions, to lean, static media, such as
bulletins. According to media richness theory, lean media are most effectively used to
communicate routine/clear messages, whereas rich media are most effectively used to
communicate nonroutine/ambiguous messages.
Newsletters are regularly published internal documents describing information of interest to
employees regarding an array of business and nonbusiness issues affecting them.
Approximately one-third of companies rely on newsletters, typically as a means of
supplementing other means of communicating important information, such as group
meetings. Traditionally, newsletters were printed and distributed to employees, but these days
many are distributed electronically. Not only are online newsletters far less expensive to
create but they also allow information to be updated far more rapidly, making them current
and useful to everyone
Another important internal publication used in organizations is the employee handbook a
document describing to employees basic information about the company. It is a general
reference regarding the company's background, the nature of its business, and its rules.
Specifically, the major purposes of employee handbooks are: (1) to explain key aspects of the
company's policies. (2) to clarify the expectations of the company and employee toward each
other, and (3) to express the company's philosophy. Handbooks are more popular today than
ever before. This is not only because clarifying company policies may prevent lawsuits, but
also because corporate officials are recognizing that explicit statements about what their
company stands for are a useful means of effectively socializing new employees and
promoting the company's values.
Matching the Medium to the Message
What types of communication are most effective under various circumstances? In general
communication is most effective when it uses multiple channels, such as both oral and written
messages. Apparently, oral messages are useful in getting people's immediate attention, and
the follow-up written portion helps make the message more permanent, something that can be
referred to in the future. Oral messages also have the benefit of allowing for immediate two-
way communication between parties, whereas written communiqus frequently are only one-
way, or require too long for a response
Not surprisingly, two-way communications (e.g., face-to-face discussions. telephone
conversations) are more commonly used in organizations than one-way communications
(e.g., memos). For example, in a study of civilian employees of a U.S. Navy agency
approximately 83 percent of the communications taking place used two-way media. In fact.
55 percent of all communications were individual face-to-face interactions. One-way, written
communications tended to be reserved for more formal, official messages that needed to be
referred to in the future at the receiver's convenience (e.g., official announce ments about
position openings). Clearly, both written and spoken communications have their place in
organizational communication. The trick to any communication medium is not only when to
use it but how to use it wisely. For some valuable suggestions in this regard, see Table 9.2.
In essence, a medium's effectiveness depends on how appropriate it is for the kind of message
being sent. Specifically, according to a conceptualization known as media richness theory, the
effectiveness of any verbal medium depends on the extent to which it is appropriate in view
of the ambiguity of the message being sent. In particular, oral media (e.g., telephone
conversations, face-to-face meetings) are more effective than written media (e.g., notes,
memos) when messages are nonroutine or ambiguous. This is because the information
contained in such messages is likely to be unclear to recipients, requiring the additional
assistance in interpretation that oral media provide. If you've ever found yourself giving up
on e-mail and calling someone to discuss something that is too complex, then you know what
we mean.
By contrast, written media are more effective when messages are clear. For example, using e-
mail to send someone a billing address or a phone number or directions to a company
location all very clear and highly specific information is more effective because it avoids
errors. Problems of mishearing a number, for example, are eliminated, and people easily can
refer to the written message when the information it contains is called for. In view of this, the
quest for effective communication should be seen not simply as a question of what
communication medium is best, but rather, what medium is best suited to the particular
message being sent (recall the summary in Figure 9.5).
lmportantly, managers who follow these practices by matching the type of communications
media they use to the kind of message they are sending, considered media- sensitive,
generally perform their jobs more effectively than those who do not do so, considered media-
insensitive. Fortunately, many of us are likely to have a good intuitive sense for selecting the
appropriate medium for the messages we wish to send. If you've ever found yourself thinking
that it's best to discuss some "sensitive" or "delicate" matters in person instead of via e-mail
or phone, then you know what we mean. Matters that are "difficult" because they are
emotionally charged-those pertaining to serious illness or job termination, for example are
best handled in person instead of in writing because of the added opportunities they offer to
demonstrate sensitivity and concern. Also, in terms of media richness theory, they are
nonroutine and sufficiently ambiguous in nature to require face-to-face explanations.
However, not all managers demonstrate this sensitivity. As an extreme example,
administrators in one California school district not only informed teachers that they were
being laid off by giving them curt written notices, but delivered them to the teachers while
standing in front of their classes. The resulting embarrassment for all is easy to envision.
Clearly, these individuals would have been well served to learn a bit about media richness
theory (not very day politeness).
Nonverbal Communication
It has been estimated that people communicate at least as much nonverbally (i.e., without
words) as they do verbally. Indeed, there can be no doubt that many of the messages we send
others are transmitted without words. Here are just a few examples of how we communicate
nonverbally in organization
Mode of dress. Much of what we say about ourselves to others comes from the way
we dress. For example, despite the general trend toward casual clothing in the
workplace, higher-status people tend to dress more formally than lower-ranking
employees.
Waiting time. Higher-status people. such as managers and executives at all ranks tend
to communicate their organizational positions nonverbally by keeping ranking people
waiting to see them a gesture that sends the message that one's time is more
important.
Seating position. Higher-ranking people also assert their higher status by sitting at
the heads of rectangular tables, a position that not only has become associated with
importance over the years, but that also enables important people to maintain eye
contact with those over whom they are responsible.
Body language. When communicating in other countries, it's useful to learn not only
the verbal language spoken, but also the nonverbal, body language used. People from
various cultures interpret various verbal signs very differently than people do in the
United States. Avoiding serious miscommunications requires familiarizing one-self
with such information (see figure 9.6)
As you read this, you may be asking yourself. "What can I do to present myself more you
favorably to those around me on the job?" Specifically. What can you do nonverbally to
cultivate the impression that you have the qualities of a good leader, and that you are
worthy of promotion? Just as you can say certain things to enhance your image as a
strong, effective employee, there also are several things you can do nonverbally that will
enhance your Image. For a summary of these. See Table 9.3