Advanced Media Group Website HTML November 8, 2009 ARCHIVED March 16, 2017

WELCOME PAGE
Wednesday, October 14, 2009 3:43:14

AM <a style="font-family: Verdana; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0,
204);" target="_blank"
href="http://www.themenwhostareatgoatsmovie.com/#home" class="RE">See The
Movie "The Men Who Stare At Goats". It's About U.S. Psychic
Spies.</a> <object width="448" height="252"><param
name="allowfullscreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess"
value="always"><param name="wmode" value="transparent"><param
name="movie"
value="http://makingof.com/embed/v/fe73f687e5bc5280214e0486b273a5f9"><em
bed src="http://makingof.com/embed/v/fe73f687e5bc5280214e0486b273a5f9"
type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true"
allowscriptaccess="always" wmode="transparent" width="448"
height="252"></object> <div style="text-align: center;"><a
style="font-family: Verdana; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 204); background-
color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" target="_blank" href="http://den-
a.plr.liquidcompass.net/cust/KTSAAM/audio_player.php?
id=KTSAAM&playerType=silverlight" class="RE">CLICK HERE EVERY
SATURDAY EVENING AT 9:00 PM TO 10 PM EST FOR A LIVE CALL IN TALK SHOW
</a> <a style="font-family: Verdana; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 204);
background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" target="_blank" href="http://den-
id=KTSAAM&playerType=silverlight" class="RE">EXPOSING </a><a
style="font-family: Verdana; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 204); background-
color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" target="_blank" href="http://den-
id=KTSAAM&playerType=silverlight" class="RE">THE ATROCITIES OF
ORGANIZED STALKING; HARASSMENT; </a> <a style="font-family: Verdana;
font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 204); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"
target="_blank" href="http://den-
id=KTSAAM&playerType=silverlight" class="RE">AND ELECTROMAGNETIC
WEAPONS AND DEVICES.</a> </div> <div style="text-
align: center;"> ADVANCED MEDIA
GROUP ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP,
LTD., & STAN J.
CATERBONE Federal Whistleblower <a class="RE" style="font-weight: bold;"
href="http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/gpage17.html"
target="_blank">(Federal False Claims Act Violation in
1987 re ISC</a>) <a class="RE"
style="font-weight: bold; font-family: Verdana;"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/advanced-media-
press-release-organized-stalking-and-directed-energy-devices-and-weapons-bill-
may-20-2009.pdf" target="_blank">Targeted Individual of
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and Directed Energy Devices and
Weapons</a> EXECUTIVE SUMMARY copyright 2009 </div> <div style="text-align: justify;"> Date Completed: July 28, 2009 Date Initiated: July 8, 2009
 <a class="RE"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/appeal-hearing-
statutes-for-april-30-2007-apr-27-2007.pdf" target="_blank">Stan J. Caterbone, Pro
Se</a></div> <div style="text-align:
justify;"><a
class="RE" href="http://www.freedomfchs.com/" target="_blank">Member of Freedom From Covert Surveillance and
Harassment Organization</a> </div> <div
style="text-align: justify;">Advanced Media
Group 1250 Fremont Street Lancaster, PA 17603 amgroup01@msn.com www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com 717-826-
5354</div> <a class="RE"
href="http://radicalfilms.co.uk/2007/10/19/dr-nick-begich-at-eceti-the-battle-for-
your-mind-and-what-you-can-do-about-it-easily-the-most-important-film-youll-see-
this-year-ed/" target="_blank">For The
Sophisticated Viewer - Click Here for Video by Dr. Nick Berich, Physicist from
Anchorage, Alaska Presentation on Mind Control; Non-Lethal Weapons and Directed
Energy Devices(scroll down on opening page)</a> HISTORY <div style="text-align: justify;">In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone went public with
allegations of fraud within I<a class="RE"
style="font-weight: bold;"
target="_blank">nternational Signal and Control, or
ISC</a> as they were commonly referred. After discussions with ISC and
United Chem Con officials (an ISC/James Guerin straw company), <a class="RE"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/1987-transcript-of-
pa-securities-commission-investigation-sep-29-1987.pdf" target="_blank">and as a shareholder of record since 1983 of ISC, Stan J.
Caterbone had a meeting with an ISC executive on June 23, 1987,</a>
which resulted in a 22 year legal odyssey. The discussions involved a joint venture
with his company, Financial Management Group, Ltd., or FMG, Ltd., but ended in
disclosure of his recent public allegations of fraud. Four years later, <a class="RE" style="font-weight: bold;"
href="http://advancedmediagroupresearch.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/lnp-isc-
headlines-may-22-2007.pdf" target="_blank">ISC founder
and chairman James Guerin, and other officials and companies pleaded guilty to a
$1 Billion Dollar Fraud and export violations</a> including the selling of
arms through South Africa to Iraq and Sadaam Hussein. <a class="RE"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/high-american-
helix-advanced-media-group-memos-part-1-february-26-2009.pdf"
target="_blank">However, money, power, influence and
public corruption</a> had been used to cover-up the activities and Federal
False Claims Act Violations of Stan J. Caterbone for the next eighteen years.
There ensued a total blockade of all United States Courts for all redress and remedy
available in accordance with federal, state, and local laws. This included recovery of
his business interests; intellectual property; real estate; personal and business real
property; his unblemished and impressive reputation; and his most valuable asset -
the ability to produce income. This might be legally referred to as the Right-To-Work
under federal statutes. Notwithstanding, Stan J. Caterbone has never made a bad
investment or developed a business that did not make a profit over the next 22
years. This includes two real estate properties that were illegally seized through
foreclosure proceedings. Since 1987
Stan J. Caterbone has been a prisoner and enemy of the state. ISC was a
Department of Defense (DOD) Contractor and a partner with United States
Intelligence Agencies since it's beginings in the early 1970's. One of it's first
contracts was Project X with the <a class="RE" style="font-weight: bold;"
target="_blank">National Security Agency or NSA of Ft.
Meade, Maryland</a>. </div> In summary, the following are facts and part of the public record
regarding <a class="RE" style="font-weight: bold;"
target="_blank">INTERNATIONAL SIGNAL &
CONTROL OR ISC</a>: <div style="text-align: justify;"><ul><li>Once the third (3rd) largest employer in the County of Lancaster,
Pennsylvania, with over 5,000 employees.</li> <li>James
Guerin, founder and CEO was once the largest philanthropist to charitable
organizations in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania.</li> <li>The
ISC/Ferranti Scandal was the third (3) largest white-collar fraud within the United
States as of 1992.</li> <li>The
following are some of the public officials and politicians associated with
ISC:</li> <li>George H.W. Bush, former U.S. President, and
Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).</li> <li>Robert
Gates, former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and current
Secretary of Defense.</li> <li>Bobby Ray
Inman, former Board of Directors if ISC, former Director of the NSA, and currently
associated and directly involved with Mind Control Research
organizations.</li> <li>Alexander
Haig, former U.S. Secretary of State, and ISC lobbyist and Board of Directors?
</li> <li>Joseph McDade, former Pennsylvania House of
Representative and Chair of the Appropriations Committee who was later
investigated for the United Chem Con scandal.</li> <li>Carlos
Cardoen/Cardoen Industries, a joint venture partner with ISC and arms merchant for
the cluster bomb who eventually sold to Iraq and other Middle Eastern Countries
under U.S. sanctions. </li> <li><a class="RE"
href="http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/4724766.html"
target="_blank">ISC was credited with the
design of the cluster bomb, and has patents filed in the U.S. Patent
Office.</a></li> <li>In 1987 ISC
completed the merger with the 3rd largest defense contractor of Great Britain,
Ferranti International; who paid $1 billion dollars for ISC and all of it's
subsidiaries.</li> <li>ABC
News/Financial Times aired 3 episodes on ABC Nightline with Ted Koppel regarding
the ISC/CIA defense weapons; technologies; and cluster bombs to Iraq story and
lead into the allegations that then nominee for the Director of CIA Robert Gates was
involved with ISC and the selling of arms to Iraq.</li> <li>ABC News
20/20 aired a story on the ISC/CIA efforts to sell cluster bombs to Saadam Hussein
and Iraq on February 1, 1991 days after the start of the Persian Gulf War I, with the
initial bombing raid destroying a cluster bomb factory built in Iraq by Carlos
Cardoen.</li> <li><a class="RE"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/joseph-f-roda-
documents-for-sammy-guerin-june-29-2007.pdf" target="_blank">On July 1st and 2nd of 1987 Stan J. Caterbone solicited the legal
counsel of Lancaster Attorney Joseph Roda for
counsel regarding, FMG, Ltd., International Signal & Control (ISC);
Commonwealth Bank, etc., and was billed for his services. Joseph Roda did
absolutely nothing but refute Stan J. Caterbone's
claims and would not believe him.</a></li> <li>In
Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas), Lancaster
Attorney Joseph Roda represented William Clark, ISC's in-house legal counsel, and
never mentioned any conflict to Stan J. Caterbone in 1987. </li> <li>In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas), James Guerin deposited $1.75 million dollars into an escrow account at
Fulton Bank, Lancaster, County.</li> <li>In Clark v.
Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas), Christopher
Underhill of Harman, Underhill & Brubaker, represented James Guerin. In 2005
Christopher Underhill represented the Manheim Township Police Department (05-cv-
2288 U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania) CATERBONE v.
Lancaster County Prison, et. al.,</li> <li><a class="RE" style="font-weight: bold; font-family: Verdana;"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/joseph-f-roda-
documents-for-sammy-guerin-june-29-2007.pdf" target="_blank">In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas), Philadelphia Attorney Joseph Tate
represented James Guerin and ISC, and in 2007 Joseph Tate represented Scooter
Libby during his federal prosecution by U.S. Special Prosecutor
Fitzpatrick.</a> </li></ul></div>THE MANIFEST OF
A COVER-UP <div style="text-align: justify;">Not only did the allegations of fraud within ISC have to be silenced at a
time when merger negotiations were ongoing with Ferranti, but all of the fraud;
extortion; public corruption; burglaries; civil rights violations; anti-trust and
intellectual property right violations; lender liability torts; false arrests; false
imprisonments; as well as other civil and criminal activities had to be covered up
and buried in bureaucratic red tape. Information and findings are still being
uncovered and discovered to this day. Contrary to popular belief, up until 1996 a
grand jury investigation into ISC was still ongoing. It is not known whether it has
closed or not. All of these activates constitute a RICO crime due to the pattern and
organization of the perpetrators. The pattern and source of the activities can be
traced back to 1987, with subgroups changing over time, but still engaging in the
same practices. The following plan of action was followed in order to perpetrate the
cover-up: </div><ul><li>Totally
discredit Stan(ley) J. Caterbone and any and all allegations in every way
possible.</li> <li><a class="RE"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/ci-08-13373-april-
71.pdf" target="_blank">Fabricate a history of mental
illness.</a> </li> <li><a class="RE"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/appeal-hearing-
statutes-for-april-30-2007-apr-27-2007.pdf" target="_blank">Fabricate a criminal
record.</a></li> <li><a class="RE"
target="_blank">Attach his character and
honesty with rumors and
propaganda.</a></li> <li>Extort and
maintain his net worth to $ zero or load him with debts.</li> <li>Keep him out of any profession and or occupation when and where
possible.</li> <li>Totally
isolate him and disenfranchise him from his friends, colleagues, and family into a
life of solitaire.</li> <li><a
class="RE"
group-sues-hoteliers-re-convention-center.pdf" target="_blank">Somehow persuade the community of Lancaster County to buy
into this plan of action through money, favors,
etc.</a>,</li> <li>Always
keep attorneys and anyone remotely involved with the legal community away at
times when efforts for justice are pursued.</li> <li>When
attempts to enter the U.S. legal system arise, isolate, harass, and extort any monies
and/or possessions of value.</li> <li>Change the
history of events and the truth. </li></ul>THE COURTS AND THE UNITED STATES LEGAL
SYSTEM <div style="text-
align: justify;">For eighteen years, (from 1987
until 2005) it has always been fairly easy to keep these issues from court dockets
and judges. During these years Stan J. Caterbone had solicited at least twenty
attorneys, some from large firms with national recognition in their respective fields
of specialties. Attorneys from New York City to Santa Barbara and San Diego
California were visited and consulted as well as a group of ex FBI agents who
specialized in white collar crime that are now globally recognized. However, the
money and influence of persons and entities that wanted these issues silence
always prevailed. The issues were so complex and convoluted, and involved such
high profile politicians and U.S. agencies, it was far easier to state that there was no
case, or their were no claims that would result in remedy or redress. Between the
Republican Party and the Department of Defense, the CIA and the NSA, there was
not an attorney that could not be influenced. The obstruction of justice and due
process in this case is most likely unprecedented in nature and in
malice. However in 2005 that all changed
when Stan J. Caterbone appeared as a pro se litigant representing himself, without
any counsel, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. The Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or case no. 05-
cv-2288. This case is still not settled and has been withdrawn by plaintiff Stan J.
Caterbone in October of 2008 after a successful ruling in the U.S. Third Circuit Court
of Appeals (07-4474) in September of 2008. The case will be continued upon the
security of evidence and the cease and desist of obstruction of justice and due
process. On May 16, 2005 at the Federal Courthouse in Philadelphia, Stan J.
Caterbone filed the case under seal. One week later in the United States Bankruptcy
Court for Eastern Pennsylvania in Reading, Pennsylvania, again appearing as pro se,
Stan J. Caterbone filed a petition for protection under the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
Code, in case no. 05-23059. These acts of
entering the United States legal system with these issues triggered yet another
round of attempts to keep these cases from the courts and judges - Organized
Stalking with Directed Energy Devices and Weapons, built on a foundation of mental
telepathy or total Mind Control. </div><div style="text-align: justify;"> </div><div style="text-
align: justify;"><a class="RE" style="font-weight: bold; font-family: Verdana;"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/freedon-from-
covert-harassment-and-surveillance-ffchs-website-may-19-2009.pdf"
target="_blank">REMOTE VIEWING; ORGANIZED
STALKING; DIRECTED ENERGY DEVICES AND WEAPONS.</a> <a class="RE"
press-release-organized-stalking-and-directed-energy-devices-and-weapons-bill-
may-20-2009.pdf" target="_blank">Oranized stalking and
harassment began in 1987 following the public allegations of fraud within
ISC.</a> This organized stalking and harassment was enough to drive an
ordinary person to suicide. As far back as the late 1980's Stan J. Caterbone knew
that his mind was being read, or "remotely viewed". This was verified and confirmed
when information only known to him, and never written, spoken, or typed, was
repeated by others. In 1998, while soliciting the counsel of Philadelphia attorney
Christina Rainville, (Rainville represented Lisa Michelle Lambert in the Laurie Show
murder case), someone introduced the term remote viewing through an email. That
was the last time it was an issue until 2005. The term was researched, but that was
the extent of the topic. Remote Viewers may have attempted to connect in a more
direct and continuous way without success. <a class="RE" style="font-weight: bold;"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/u-s-attorney-
complaint-of-april-25-2009-re-mind-control-lancaster-county-pennsylvania.pdf"
target="_blank">In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind
control </a>turned into an all-out assault of mental telepathy; synthetic
telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy devices and
weapons that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted
victim. This assault was no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the
filing of the federal action in U.S. District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County
Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288. This assault began after the handlers remotely trained
Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy. The main difference opposed to most other
victims of this technology is that Stan J. Caterbone is connected 24/7 with a person
who declares that she is Interscope recording artist Sheryl Crow of Kennett Missouri.
Stan J. Caterbone has spent 3 years trying to validate and confirm this person
without success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the <a
class="RE" style="font-weight: bold;"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/duke-st-business-
center-case-08-13373-praecipe-to-file-exhibit-a-8-may-18-20091.pdf"
target="_blank">F</a><a class="RE"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/duke-st-business-
center-case-08-13373-praecipe-to-file-exhibit-a-8-may-18-20091.pdf"
target="_blank">ederal Bureau of Investigation and the
U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment</a>. See attached documents for more information. In 2006 or the beginning of 2007 Stan J. Caterbone
began his extensive research into mental telepathy; mind control technologies;
remote viewing; and the CIA mind control program labeled MK ULTRA and it's
subprograms. </div>FAMILY
HISTORY If you listen to the propaganda machine and the community of
Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, including professionals, the family history of Stan J.
Caterbone goes something like the following: <ul><li>Father, Samuel
Caterbone, Jr., Schizophrenic who ran out on his family because of nervous
breakdowns while trying to run a small dry cleaning business. He traveled the world
looking for the Blessed Mother Mary and Space Aliens. He ended up living in
government subsidized housing broke and with a severe mental
illness.</li> <li>Brother, Samuel A. Caterbone, suffered from the very
same illness has his father, Schizophrenia, who finally killed himself trying to live in
California.</li> <li>Brother,
Thomas W. Caterbone, suffered from the very same mental illness as his brother,
Stan J., Bipolar Mood Disorder, who ran a lawn business and finally committed
suicide at an early age.</li> <li>Stan J.
Caterbone, suffered from Bipolar Mood Disorder, or Manic Depression and had a
nervous breakdown in 1987 trying to compete in the financial services industry.
When he has his nervous breakdowns, he always threatens to sue everyone in court
and is deeply paranoid in thinking the whole world is against him. He always spends
all of his money during his fits of mania and has delusions about his success as a
businessman. </li></ul><div
style="text-align: justify;">The Family History
was formulated back in the 1960's when Samuel Caterbone, Jr., father of Stan J.
Caterbone, became engaged in a black budget mind control program that began
during his service in the United States Navy as a radioman and air gunner. Samuel
Caterbone, Jr., was most likely a direct product of MK ULTRA or one of it's
subprograms. His brother, Samuel A. Caterbone, was most likely part of the LSD
experiments of MK ULTRA. Stan J. Caterbone is most likely part of a program
sponsored by the Department of Defense Agencies, such as DARPA or the Defense
Intelligence Agency (DIA). The facts of Stan J. Caterbone's intimate discussions with
both his father and brother over the years before they died, the totality of
documents that were preserved in thier estate, including service records; letters;
official court papers; high school documents; and the like - all will prove that they
were in fact part of MK ULTRA or one of it's subprograms. The following are the facts
and the real record of the family history: <a class="RE"
73.pdf" target="_blank">Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., (Father) served in the Navy from
1943 to 1946 and graduated with honors from Air Gunners School in Jacksonville,
Florida.</a> He was an
exceptional student/athlete while attending Lancaster Catholic High School,
participating in the band as well as sports. He was also his senior class
secretary/treasurer. After the Navy, he went on to build a successful dry cleaning
business, which he is credited with inventing a filtration system for the solvents. He
also developed a very good investment in real estate along the Manheim Pike,
owning several properties. By his own writings and from his personal accounts to
me, he was definitely a remote viewer for some U.S. Agency with telepathic
abilities. His viewing is documented to have begun back in the early 1970's. He also
suffered from organized stalking, and was considered an enemy and prisoner of the
state. Back in the 1960's, he was a world traveler, this is documented by his
passports. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., may have been a covert carrier for someone in
intelligence. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., had his mental health history laced with
electro shock therapy. Electro Shock Therapy Experiments is another subprogram of
MK ULTRA. In addition, and especially disturbing is his criminal record with the
Lancaster City Police Department and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.
In 1973 Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr. was convicted of forging a 2 checks from the
Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., checking account. The one check to Joe the Motorists
Store at the Manor Shopping Center was never entered into evidence, it was for a
total of $70.00. The other check was made out to Lancaster Attorney James Coho
for $200.00 with "divorce proceedings" written in the memo. This was his only
criminal record. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., was sentenced to one year probation by
President Judge William Johnstone. However, on August 29, 1973 after nine months,
Judge Johnstone wrote an ORDER releasing him from probation and ordering him to
"leave the vicinity of the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania". T<a class="RE"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/us-attorney-crimial-
complaint-re-samuel-caterbone-criminal-february-6-20091.pdf"
target="_blank">he President Judge of Lancaster County
Court of Common Pleas literally threw my father
out of Lancaster County for forging 2 checks from his own corporation.</a>
In 1987 I was arrested for stealing my own files from my own company, Financial
Management Group, Ltd., You can research the life of Candy Jones and Kate O'Brien
to learn more on this topic. Samuel Caterbone, Jr., has left enough writings and
documentation to know that his life fits the model for targeted individuals, complete
with economic ruin, isolation, disenfranchised from family and friends, and of course
a fabricated mental illness history. You can view most of his record
online. <a class="RE"
72.pdf" target="_blank">Samuel A. Caterbone, (Brother) served in the United States Air Force in 1968
to 1970.</a> In 1991, Stan J. Caterbone
accused the United States Government of using his brother, Samuel A. Caterbone
for part of the LSD experiments on mind control, or MK ULTRA. A notarized letter of
October 23, 1991 was sent certified mail to the California Attorney General on the
subject matter, with a return letter from the California Attorney General on January
14, 1992. By his own admission before his death, Samuel A. Caterbone disclosed to
Stan J. Caterbone of the "bad LSD" trips while in the Air Force. Since his death of
December 25, 1984, Stan J. Caterbone and others questioned the classification of
suicide, and made allegations of foul play that was ultimately responsible for his
death. Finally in a meeting in Santa Barbara, California with the Santa Barbara
Public Guardian's Office, an office admitted that the death was more likely due to
foul plan than suicide. Samuel A. Caterbone was also an exceptional student and
athlete while attending Lancaster Catholic High School. After playing varsity football
as a sophomore, he had an unfortunate accident while deer hunting the following
November. While in the woods in Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, his hunting pants caught
fire trying to stay warm. It left him in the Lancaster General Hospital for months,
going through painful skin grafts and isolation. The hunting accident interrupted his
athletic career and scared his legs for life. The Schizophrenia diagnosis was a
combination of LSD flashbacks and organized stalking and harassment. Thomas P. Caterbone, (Brother) had an unfortunate
transaction at Fulton Bank that set a course of action that resulted in a suicide.
Although diagnosed with Bipolar Disease and Manic Depression -- embezzled and
extorted monies were most likely the reason for his suicide in 1996. Fulton Bank was
involved in a fraud that took $72,000 from a real estate settlement closing and lead
to his total financial ruin and collapse in June of 1995. The funds were never
recovered and Fulton Bank is a defendant for a wrongful death claim in the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v.
Lancaster County Prison, et. al., 05-cv-2288. FULTON BANK triggered a severe and
lethal death blow to Thomas P. Caterbone, and as of this day has refused to
acknowledge any wrongdoing or remorse. Thomas P. Caterbone was also an
exceptional athlete. Playing for Lancaster Catholic High School, Franklin and
Marshall College, the Harrisburg Patriots, and even the Philadelphia Eagles. Tom also
coached football at J.P. McCaskey and Franklin and Marshall College. Thomas P.
Caterbone had a very successful lawn and landscaping business before joining
forces with John DePatto of United Financial Services and selling residential
mortgages. John DePatto was the former head of Parent Bank, owned by James
Guerin and ISC. Parent Bank, owned by ISC also foreclosed on 2323 New Danville
Pike, Conestoga, Pennsylvania in 1988, which was owned by Stan J. Caterbone.
Thousands of dollars of equity was extorted in the process, despite still being short
sold for a profit to Mr. Keith Kirchner, an executive of Lancaster Newspapers and
former graduate of Lancaster Catholic High School. Stan J. Caterbone is a remote viewer, is telepathic, and a federal
whistleblower with an exceptional entrepreneurial record in spite of all of his
adversaries and their assaults. In spite of the U.S. Sponsored mind control and
torture, he has endured and will prevail. Legally, Stan J. Caterbone has been able to
preserve his claims, and progress his legal challenges and claims through both the
federal and state court system appearing pro se, without the aid or expense of
additional legal counsel. Some of his claims and briefs will most likely be landmark
decisions in years to come. S<a
class="RE" style="font-weight: bold;"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/stan-caterbone-
football-scrapbook-senior-year-season-1975-june-24-2007.pdf"
target="_blank">tan J. Caterbone was a 2-Sport MVP at
Lancaster Catholic High School</a>, in both football and track. <a class="RE" style="font-weight: bold;"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/stan-caterbone-
lchs-high-school-transcripts-1976.pdf" target="_blank">Stan J. Caterbone never received less than a B grade in his four
years of high school and had an 87+ </a>average. <a class="RE"
target="_blank">Stan J. Caterbone excelled in computer
technologies, taking his first full term course in 1975</a>, while in high
school and continuing into college at Millersville University, graduating with a
degree in business administration in 1980. Stan J. Caterbone excelled profoundly at
building his companies, first beginning with Financial Management Group, Ltd., then
working with Tony Bongiovi of Power Station Studios and the "Digital Movie"; then
building Advanced Media Group, Ltd.. Over the years, despite the illegal seizures
and foreclosures, Stan J. Caterbone has amassed a portfolio of impressive real
estate deals that have always paid off in profits, no matter how or when they were
sold. The same was true of his businesses. Financial Management Group, Ltd., was a
$20,000 dollar investment in 1986 and was still sold for approximately $100,000
two years later, despite the false arrests and the extortion of most of it's real value
and equity. The mental health history and the
criminal records were completely fabricated, and a close review and investigation
into the actual court records and hospital records can prove that in very short
fashion. There are TWO (2) ways to quickly dispute the Mental Health History and
Record: One - Review the word "Delusional;
delusions; etc.,; every instance of the word used by mental health professionals,
and the false reports by friends and family were associated with facts, and matters
of the official record, the complete opposite of the meaning of the word
"delusional". And they still exist to this very day. Two - Review the 3 Fabricated Suicide Allegations of the following dates:
August 10(?), 1987 at Burdette Tomlin Hospital (Cape May County New Jersey);
February 18th(?), 2005 by Kerry Egan and the Southern Regional Police Department;
and July 19, 2009 for the 302 Commitment by the Lancaster City Police Department
at Lancaster General Hospital. The Criminal
Record is very similar, since 1987 Stanley J. Caterbone has had 31 false arrests;
formal charges and convictions dismissed prior to court proceedings or won on
summary appeals in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania; most of which Stan J.
Caterbone appearing as pro se (representing himself). These have resulted in civil
complaints filed in 2008 in CATERBONE v. The County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania in
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. THE PUBLIC
RECORD The Public Record is comprised of court filings and exhibits in U.S.
Federal Courts; Pennsylvania State Courts; and the Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas. In all some 40,000 pages of documents are now filed and
electronically scanned or microfilmed in prothonotary offices. In addition in both the
U.S. Federal Courts and the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas there are
more than 11 hours of audio recordings; some 3,000 scanned images; and several
video broadcasts of the ISC News broadcasts all stored on a CD-ROM and filed as an
exhibit to some of the law suits filed by Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media
Group, as plaintiffs. Stan J. Caterbone has over 100 court docket sheet numbers in
federal, state, and local courts. There are also
Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation records; Department of Welfare and
Lancaster County Assistance Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster
County Tax Assessment records; Social Security Administration Benefits records;
Lancaster Catholic High School transcripts; Millersville University transcripts; all for
Stan J. Caterbone, in addition to his court filings. For Samuel A. Caterbone, my brother, there are United States Air Force
service records; Lancaster Catholic High School transcripts; Millersville University
transcripts; Social Security Administration records; Santa Barbara County Guardian
and Public Defender records; and papers and documents persevered from his
estate. For Samuel P. Caterbone, my
father, there are United States Naval records, Lancaster Catholic High School
transcripts; Social Security Administration records; Lancaster County Assistance
Office records; Local Real Estate Tax records; Lancaster County Tax Assessment
records; Samuel Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., corporate records; Real Estate Deeds and
Mortgages; Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas civil and criminal records; and
of course papers and documents persevered from his estate PUBLIC WEBSITE ADDRESSES OF
INTEREST: WWW.AMGGLOBALENTERTAINMENTGROUP.COM WWW.ADVANCEDMEDIAGROUP.WORDPRESS.COM WWW.ADVANCEDMEDIAGROUPRESEARCH.WORDPRESS.COM WWW.ADVANCEDMEDIAGROUP.YOUTUBE.COM WWW.FREEDOMFFCHS.COM WWW.AMGGLOBALENTERTAINMENTGROUP.COM/NEW DOCUMENT
LIBRARY DOCUMENTS ATTACHED FOR REVIEW (Available in the Printed
Version) ** It is important to note that as of this writing, Remote Viewing
has recently been commercialized by corporate America, and certain Fortune 500
companies are using Remote Viewers as consultants for trend analysis and market
forecasts. This is often the evolution of most technologies born out of the U.S.
Department of Defense. Top Secret experiments and the resulting technological
advancements can stay secretive for so long. This has recently been used in a NBC
story of the Television drama "Medium" this last season. On July 9, 2008 I had
recorded an AM radio live broadcast on WHAN Coast to Coast with a guest that was
one of the leading Physicist turned Remote Viewer and expert that testified to this
same notion. </div> <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"><div style="text-
align: center;"><div style="text-align: left;">Updated Sunday, September 6, 2009 3:26:09 PM </div> VANDALISM; THEFT; AND
HARASSMENT REPORT September 6, 2009 Advanced Media
Group AND Stan J. Caterbone 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA 17603 scaterbone@live.com www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com 717-669-2163 (No Voice Mail) </div> September 6, 2009 There are several new
incidents since September 2, 2009 to report. <ul><li
style="font-family: Verdana;">On Friday, September 4, 2009 I
spent about an hour with a technician/salesman from Select Security, a company
owned and operated by Lancaster Township resident Patrick Egan, for a proposal
and estimate on a security and monitoring system for my home/office at 125
3:26:09 PM0 Fremont Street. We agreed on a price and payment schedule and he
gave me an installation date of Wednesday, September 9, 2009. He left the meeting
to meet with Patrick Egan and was supposed to email me an electronic version of
the hardware; and payment schedule. He later emailed me and said Hey Stan,
Select Security is unable to assist you with your security needs. Thanks, Matt Self,
Sales and Marketing Coordinator, Select Security, 241 N. Plum Street, Lancaster, PA
17602, Direct: (717) 481-6307 * Fax: (717) 481-7574 </li> <li
style="font-family: Verdana;">September 4, 2009 during First
Friday in Downtown Lancaster I (1991 Dodge Dakota 4WD Pickup Truck) was rear
ended with malice by two Spanish persons driving a 1991 Chevrolet Blazer,
Burgundy SW. Damage to my rear bumper. I was smart enough to stay in the exact
position and made certain the assailants did the same. I took crime scene photos
that proved the car was not legally registered at the time of the incident and the
tires were aligned toward my truck, proving that they came across from the inner
lane on King Street as I was backing into a parking spot. Also, it is my testimony
that the female was driving and first got out of her car yelling at me and accusing
me of being drunk and a crack head. I had just come from Sheetz on Manheim Pike;
Lancaster Bicycle Shop on Manheim Pike; Weis Markets; Home Depot; and the Office
Max, all of Red Rose Commons, after leaving my home/office. I have time stamped
receipts. I was at no other place during the entire day. The incident occurred at
approximately 8:15pm with Lancaster City Police Officer Mendez, Badge No. 92. The
assailants names are George Maldonado of 1202 Clay Road, #1, Lititz,
Pennsylvania, 17543 and Kristin Wilson, 220 Kinseyville Road, Nottingham, PA
19362. They have Allstate Insurance, Policy No. 928473088. I have 10 crime scene
photos. The Assign. No. is 004463. Two James Street Investment District Bike Patrol
Persons also harassed me, both males that I did not recognized. As soon as the
Lancaster City Police responded I made sure he called the Lancaster City Safety
Coalition to see if a video was available.</li> <li style="font-family:
Verdana;">My Zenith SM274481195 36 Television/Stereo was
vandalized yesterday, September 5, 2009 and no longer works at all. The power no
longer comes on.</li> <li style="font-family: Verdana;">After sealing my patio with a brown tarp, the corner closest to Dawn
Sutton of 1248 Fremont Street was totally undone by vandals, yesterday or last
night, September 5, 2009.</li> <li style="font-family: Verdana;">I was harassed by Dawn Sutton and chased off of my patio roof while
painting yesterday, September 5, 2009 then she followed and stalked me at the CVS
Store, Manor Shopping Center about an hour later.</li> <li>Considering that about a month ago
they vandalized and broke my Sharp RV-DV550U Digital VHS/DVD Recorder and my
Panasonic RF-PV275 27.5 Flat Screen DVD/VHS Television Set, just about every
piece of electronics has now been vandalized in my home, including 2 laptop
computers, 1 desktop computer, and 2 ink jet
printers.</li></ul> <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"> September 4, 2009 On
September 4, 2009 we applied for security through Select Security of Plum Street,
Lancaster, Pennsylvania and are awaiting a response. Choice Security and Yarnell
Security have already been excluded from any type of inquiry due to fraud and or
harassment in the past regarding the installation and monitoring of a home security
system at 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, Pennsylvania. No one better cause a
problem in our negotiations for a home security system for our home/office at 1250
Fremont Street, Lancaster, Pennsylvania. This report does not cover all
incidents, but was compiled mainly due to the surge in vandalism over the past
week or so. Since the end of June, 2009 we have been dictating memos
on a micro cassette recorder and securing them offsite. This new techniques was
administered mainly as the result of the Pain Assault initiated on July 8, 2009 and
executed in part by the Lancaster General Hospital, the Lancaster Regional Medical
Center, the Lancaster City Police, and Mastropietro and Associates Family
Practice. The memos are of daily incidents of vandalism; harassment;
stalking; and torture by directed energy devices and weapons and or
electromagnetic microwave technology. (See Executive Summary - Federal
Whistleblower and Targeted Individual of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control dated July 28,
2009) <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"> September 3, 2009 Update on Current and Recent
Vandalism/Theft Reports: <ul><li style="font-
family: Verdana;">September 2, 2009 broke gear cable on bike in
order to cause accident by having cable wrap around chain while riding. Vandalism
happened in front of Fulton Bank, Manor Shopping Center, where bike was parked.
Also bent front reflector.</li> <li style="font-family: Verdana;">September 1, 2009 broke outside light under patio and left the metal in
the socket so that you have to remove without being able to unscrew the actual
light bulb.</li> <li style="font-family: Verdana;">Stole
bird feed from backyard bird feeder, twice in last week and a
half.</li> <li style="font-family: Verdana;">Drain hot
tub of water on a continuous basis.</li> <li style="font-family:
Verdana;">On August 27th or 28th soaked passenger floor of 1991
Dodge Pick-up Truck. This used to be done every time it rained, however, it stopped
on or about June 15, 2009 when William Lefty Richard Plank was committed to
Lancaster County Prison</li> <li style="font-family: Verdana;">Hacked new Compaq Presario Laptop.</li> <li style="font-
family: Verdana;">On August 28, 2009 hacked the edit page of
Advanced Media Group website, www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
.</li> <li>Just
about every home improvement done over the last several days has been
sabotaged after completion, or they have done everything to prevent me from
making purchases required for the projects. </li></ul> <hr style="width: 100%; height:
2px;">September 1, 2009 Other Incidents And Surges Of Harassment;
Vandalism; And Electromagnetic and Telepathic Torture of last few days (August 25,
2009 to August 29, 2009) : <ul><li>Today, August 29, 2009 Six (6) of Water drained
from hot tub.</li> <li>Today, August 29, 2009 Passenger Side Floor Flooded with
Water.Brand New Compaq Presario CQ60-421NR Does Not Operate
Without Major Problems.Office Max Sold Computer and Software on Misinformation
regarding Microsoft Office, Which Had to be Returned.Today, August 29, 2009 Went to the Manheim Township Police
Station to Report Thefts by Deception and got Harassed by Officer Taking Report; He
Tried To Provoke Me.Lancaster Solid Waste Management Would Not Provide Correct
Information for Recycling Yard Waste.</li> <li>Constantly Harassed By Neighbors,
Especially the Bloods and Crypts or CrackHeads. </li></ul> <hr style="width: 100%; height:
2px;">Saturday, August 29,
2009 9:50:00 AM (4) Four
Manheim Township Merchants Commit Theft By Deception on August 26th, August
27th, and August 28th of 2009. <ul><li>August 26, 2009 - Lens Crafters, Park City Mall, Manheim Township,
Pennsylvania refused to provide Eye Examination for Prescription Glasses and/or
Prescription Glasses.August 27, 2009 - Kohls Department Store, Park City Mall,
Manheim Township, Pennsylvania switched a pair of Asics Sneakers Size 9 to Avia
Size 11 at the checkout counter. August 27, 2009 - Dr. Harry
Breitman, Optometrist, Park City Mall, Manheim Township, Pennsylvania Examined
Eyes for $49.00 and the Prescription was wrong. August 28, 2009 - Eyemart Express Store No. 71, Park City Mall,
Manheim Township, Pennsylvania, Charged $288.86 for (2) Pair of eyeglasses that
were not right and could not be used, $288.86 was voided that day, however no
credit was issued on bank statement as of yet. August 28, 2009 - Cartridge World, of 1937-B Fruitville Pike,
Manheim Township, Pennsylvania, charged $35.76 for (2) Lexmark Ink Cartridges
that were empty. The black printed 3 pages before running out of ink and the color
cartridge registered as "Low Ink" upon installation. </li></ul> <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;">Friday, August 28, 2009 9:00:00 AM
 PRESS RELEASE Stan J. Caterbone Awarded Social
Security Benefits for Mind Control Symptoms Lancaster, PA - Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced
Media Group are awarded benefits for claiming disability due to Mind Control and
Telepathic Harassment from the Social Security Administration and the Health and
Human Services Secretary on August 20, 2009. Stan J. Caterbone applied for
benefits on April 8, 2009 claiming harassment; torture; covert surveillance;
electromagnetic weapons; and intellectual property and privacy invasions.
 In July of 2009
Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group sent a detailed letter and
documentation (55 page pdf file) regarding Mind Control Research and victim
accounts for himself, his father (Samuel [Sam] P. Caterbone, Jr.) and brother
(Samuel[Sammy] A. Caterbone) to Kathy Sebelius, Secretary of U.S. Health and
Human Services in Washington, D.C.. Secretary Sebelius' office in turn sent the
documents to the Office of Public Query of the Social Security Administration. The
benefits were awarded twenty (20) days later. Benefits have been awarded for the time period of
April 8, 2009 to the present with monthly benefits to be received until the
symptoms are eliminated or gainful employment/business income resumes.
 The following are excerpts from some of the
application documents: Social Security Administration: Please describe your present work
activities and any changes since your disability...." Stan J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group Respons:
"Same work acitivities - Interference; harassment; theft; vandalism of files;
computers hacked; libel; slander; industrial espionage; intellectual property stolen."
 <hr style="width: 100%;
height: 2px;">Sunday,
August 23, 2009 10:45:00 AM <a class="RE"
href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=he2FqNEYSwU" target="_blank">Four (4)
Visits to Lancaster General Hospital Emergency Room/Lancaster
Regional</a>, July 11th; July 13th; July 16th and July 19th, 2009 for PAIN
in my Mouth and ended with the LANCASTER CITY POLICE Filing a 302 Psychiatric
Petition ON the EVENING OF JULY 19, 2009. Sunday, August
23, 2009 10 ;45 ;00 AM Lancaster City Police Prove Me Right Again - Refuse To Take Complaint of
Vandalism - And Harass Me During The Process! On Saturday morning I went to my truck to drive to a
Community Breakfast (Free Meals) and my battery was dead. Nothing was left on. I
called 911 and an Officer by the name of CARPENTER arrived all cocky and
belligerent. He refused to take an Organized Stalking/Directed Energy Devices
Brochure and ripped of 3 laminated postings on the PP&L telephone pole in
front of my house (they were there for over a year, viewed by other Lancaster City
Police Officers). He said that my complaint was "UNFOUNDED" and Officer Carpenter
was only interested in provoking me so he could charge me with a disorderly
conduct and try another 302 Psychiatric Evaluation Petition. POOR OFFICER CARPENTER GOT A
TASTE OF STAN J. CATERBONE, AGAIN. I need to remind
the Lancaster City Police Department Albert Einstein's definition of insanity, doing
the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result".
 <hr style="width: 100%;
height: 2px;">Tuesday,
August 18, 2009 12:00:00 PM NEW CRIMINAL/CIVIL COMPLAINT FILED IN PERSON TO PENNSYLVANIA
ATTORNEY GENERAL AND UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE/FBI
style="font-family: Verdana;">Today I filed complaints in person with the
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office in Harrisburg (Stamped and Recorded in
Executive Office); the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in Harrisburg (Discussed
Complaint with Duty Agent); and hand delivered the Executive Summary and
Victim's Account of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control with Supporting Documents (86
Pages)and my Lippiat and NSA Amicus ; Executive Summary U.S. Senator Arlen
Specters Office in Harrisburg (met with Harrisburg staffer and discussed case); and
with the Deputy Prothonotary of the Pennsylvania Superior Court (delivered to
receptionist; Deputy Prothonotary in Court Proceeding) Deputy Prothonotary
McCullough who I filed complaint against left the Superior Court in April of 2009).
Verdana;">The complaints
incl
d
d allegations of the following: Obstruction of
Justice Fraud Mail Fraud
style="font-family: Verdana;"> Public Corruption U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control U.S. Federal Torts Claim Act
Violations Abuse of Process
style="font-family: Verdana;"> Identity Theft Anti-
Trust/Intellectual Property Violations <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;">Sunday, August 16, 2009 12:00:00 PM
 HIPPOCRATIC OATH FOR PHYSICIANS
AND PSYCHIATRISTS I swear by Apollo Physician and
Asclepius and Hygieia and Panacea and all the gods, and goddesses, making them
my witnesses, that I will fulfill according to my ability and judgment this oath and
this covenant: <ul><li>To hold him who has taught me this art as equal to
my parents and to live my life in partnership with him, and if he is in need of money
to give him a share of mine, and to regard his offspring as equal to my brothers in
male lineage and to teach them this artif they desire to learn itwithout fee and
covenant; to give a share of precepts and oral instruction and all the other learning
to my sons and to the sons of him who has instructed me and to pupils who have
signed the covenant and have taken the oath according to medical law, but to no
one else.I will apply dietic measures for the benefit of the sick according to
my ability and judgment; I will keep them from harm and
injustice. I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody if asked for it, nor will
I make a suggestion to this effect. Similarly I will not give to a woman an abortive
remedy. In purity and holiness I will guard my life and my
art. I will not use the knife, not even on sufferers from stone, but will
withdraw in favor of such men as are engaged in this
work. Whatever houses I may visit, I will come for the benefit of the
sick, remaining free of all intentional injustice, of all mischief and in particular of
sexual relations with both female and male persons, be they free or
slaves. What I may see or hear in the course of treatment or even
outside of the treatment in regard to the life of men, which on no account one must
spread abroad, I will keep myself holding such things shameful to be spoken
about. If I fulfill this oath and do not violate it, may it be granted to me
to enjoy life and art, being honored with fame among all men for all time to come; if
I transgress it and swear falsely, may the opposite of all this be my lot.
 </li></ul> <hr
style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"> Friday, August 14, 10:44:25 AM NEW PAIN ASSAULT STARTED THIS WEEK AUGUST 10, 2009 - BACK
ACHES! <ul><li>Since the Pain Assault in my mouth
is now over, they started going back to the old Directed Energy Device Weapons
with Back, Neck, and Headaches.August 11, 2009
1:15:38PM I had someone at my window last night, sounded like they were
trying to open screen window. Called 911 and made complaints about 2 other
incidents for yesterday, August 10, 2009 ( dead battery at UPS Store, Stone Mill
Plaza and 8 inches of water taken out of hottub). Lancaster County Wide and Lancaster City Police forget that I
have a Police Band Radio. I taped Lancaster County Wide Communications lie to the
Lancaster Police and said that I hung up, then the Lancaster City Police said "that is
the response I thought, or something like that.Then, a sometime later, Lancaster City Police scare the hell out of
me shining a flashlight in my back kitchen door and
window. Why didn't the Lancaster City Police ring the door bell and come
to the front door?????Thankfully for my microcassette tape recorder, gotcha again!
 </li></ul> <hr
Verdana;">August 7, 2009 10:21:59 Lancaster General Hospital (LGH)Tried to Get a Court Order under the
302 Commitment to have Advanced Media Group's website taken
down: Dr. Daniel McIntyre stated on the medical file the
following as part of his notes: "... Patient has a long history of delusional thoughts
secondary to his Bipolar disorder. He apparently has a website that provides him an
avenue to express his grandiose thoughts and delusions. This patient is clearly in
need of psychiatric help. He also needs medical attention to the dental abscess he
currently is suffering with. I do not feel the patient is safe for outpatient follow up. I
have arranged for Conestoga Oral surgery to admit the patient with a 302 petition
in place. Psychiatry to see patient in consultation." Transcribed
on Mon Jul 20, 2009 12:57 AM <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;">Monday, August 3, 2009 12:49:05 PM
 <ul><li>Dr. Denise Cope of Family Practice
Associates of Lancaster on Abbeville Road, Lancaster, better not refuse me as a new
patient as my primary care physician. Today, August 3, 2009, I submitted my forms
to transfer to that practice and the receptionist tried to tell me that she needs to
review my medical file from Mastropietro Associates first. This is not what I was told
on July 29, 2009 when I first picked up the paperwork to switch primary care
physicians.Today, August 3, 2009 in my appointment with Dr. Henrichsen of
Conestoga Oral Surgeons, he said it will be a month or more until my mouth opens
wider. I am still restricted to an opening of only 1/2
inch. The following was broken and vandalized in the past week (July
25, 2009 to August 3, 2009): one gas powered week whacker; one 27" Panasonic TV
(VCR will no longer work); one Sharp DVD VCR Recorder (VCR will no longer work);
my saddle bag for my briefcase.</li> <li>I also in recent weeks added the following to
CATERBONE v. Duke Street Business Center CI-08-13373 President Obama; Attorney
General Eric Holder; and Chief of Lancaster City Police Keith Sadler; among others. I
will be claiming racial and ethnic discrimination in that
complaint. The Project Hope Tommy Caterbone Memorial Golf Tournament
that was held at Crossgates Golf Course yesterday, Saturday, August 1, 2009 ended
in disaster. I attended two times, once in the afternoon and once in the evening. Did
not see anyone I recognized on the Golf Course, and there was no dinner at 6:00
pm, as in the past 13 years. Jimmy Karpathios; his wife; Tina Albright; Lizzy Pflumm;
Pami Pflumm; Dave Pflumm; Bill Pflumm; Tina Dougherty; Dakota Royer; Tina Royer;
James Doran; all were there around the pavilion, lying to me about the golf
tournament.Lizzy Pflumm is now a confirmed Professional Stalker and
Harasser. What the hell, did the Pflumm's take over Project Hope. I did see a prize
table with tee shirts and golf shirts, which of course I was able to walk away with,
with permission from someone. First a worker from Crossgates told
me in the afternoon that dinner was at 5:30, then in the evening, 2 workers said it
was served at 3:00 pm. </li></ul>You people just don't quite.
 <ul><li>Staples of Golden Triangle Shopping Center refused on 2 occasions to
print 2 brochures from Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance
Organization (www.freedomfchs.com). One on Organized Stalking and Harassment
and One on Directed Energy Devices. On Wednesday July 29, 2009 it was Brett ...
and on Friday July 31, 2009 it was a white female. They are already a named party
as a defendant on CI-08-13373 in the Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas.Wednesday afternoon, July 28, 2009, Steve Midciff, CEO of
Lancaster Regional Medical Center agreed to a meeting to discuss their conduct.
The meeting was scheduled for Thursday, July 29, 2009 at
10:00am. Steve Midciff, the CEO of Lancaster Regional Medical Center and
Dr. Anthony Mastropietro, my former Primary Care Physician, ambushed me and
assaulted me in another attempt to 302 me. I had to leave after about one minute
in his office. Could not believe it. Just like Lori Austin of Millersville University and
the former head of LETA had done to me the past few
months. Then today, July 30, 2009 I had a medical appointment with Dr.
Rodriquez of Mastropietro Associates for a 2nd opinion of my jaw, which still only
opens 1/2" after emergency surgery. Again, Dr. Mastropietro (via telephone) and his
office manager assaulted me on the telephone, he said "do you remember meeting
with me yesterday?". The would not let me meet with Dr. Rodriquez. Did they harm
me three times, one by making me visit the Emergency Room 4 times before they
would treat me; then did they do something wrong at surgery?; and now they are
trying to cover up all the mistakes with yet another 302 petition. These people need
some serious help.I immediately went to a Family Practice on Abbeville Road and
started the process of switching my primary care
physician. Saturday, July 25, 2009 I am recuperating from surgery, they did
put me under general anesthesia. I still am not able to open my jaw very wide, and
must crumble my food. </li></ul> <hr style="width: 100%;
height: 2px;">On Thursday evening, July 23, 2009 another tooth began hurting me,
and they again began hitting me with Directed Energy Devices with Harassment.
 <ul><li>For the record, on Sunday evening
at no time did the Lancaster City Police or Lancaster General Hospital ever present
me with a 302 Warrant at my home or in the Lancaster General
Hospital.Sunday evening, July 19, 2009; LANCASTER CITY POLICE
HANDCUFF ME IN MY HOME, TAKE ME AND ONLY SHIRT, SHOES, PANTS, WALLET TO
LGH AT 9:20PM. Some of incident I have recorded of Lancaster City Police in my
home. Admitted to Behavioral Medicine in Emergency Room at
Lancaster General Hospital about 9:45pm Sunday Evening, July 19,
2009. Three hours later taken to Intermediate Intensive Care Unit Room
Number 6003. Monday, July 20, 2009 emergency surgery done on mouth,
including infection that reached into my blood stream and
system. Operation a success, thanks to Dr. Henrichsen, MD of Conestoga
Oral Surgeons and the LGH Intensive Care Unit/Operating Room Team. Interviewed
by Two (2) LGH Psychiatrists who refused to sign into 302 Petition Efforts by
LANCASTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT. DISCHARGED FROM LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL ON JULY 22,
2009.See Symptoms of the United Nations Petition in the FFCHS,
Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance
Document. Harassment by Lancaster General Hospital Doctors and Nurses.
Dr. Vito DiCarmillo and Company. Possibly Given Wrong
Medication. Left with Little Mobility in Jaw. Cannot Eat Most
Foods. Cavity; Electromagnetic Weapons; Poison; or a combination of the
three! Dr. Black, the Dentist from Willow Street, refused me as a patient
yesterday, July 15, 2009. Was a patient since 1994. Since January I have been refused treatment by a dentist from
Southeast Clinic, Lancaster City, New Holland Dental and Dr. West, and now Dr.
Black and Associates of Willow Street. Pharmacist (Mr. Jacobs) at CVS, Manor Shopping Center advised
me to see an Endocrinologist, yesterday, while harassing
me. Pharmacist at Weis Markets, Amy Brent, was harassing,
yesterday, July 15, 2009. My mobility in my jaw went from 1" to 1/2", as of
today, July 16, 2009. Pain is not subsiding, although, with the aid of
Momentum Back Relievers, I have been able to reduce swelling in
face. I must go back to another Emergency Room again today, the 8th
day of this PAIN ASSAULT. I CAN NO LONG EAT SOLID FOODS!!
WHEN WILL I BE ABLE TO EAT AGAIN!!!! WILL ANYONE PLEASE HELP ME? Do Not Have Access to Computers/Internet or Time To Provide
More Detail. </li></ul> <hr
Verdana;">Saturday, July 4, 2009 11:23:00 AM Who Are My Captors? (Go to
"New Document Library" of this Website and Document No. 4. "U.S. Attorney
Complaint..." For The Entire Documents Referenced Below) <div style="text-align: justify;">Cheney's 'Spoon-Benders Pushing Nucluear Armageddon
http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2005/3233spoonbeners.htm by Jeffrey Steinberg "The "Mind War" paper was provoked by an article by Lt. Col. John
Alexander, which appeared in the December 1980 edition of Military Review,
advocating the introduction of ESP (extra-sensory perception), "telepathic behavior
modification", Para-psychology, psycho kinesis ("mind over matter"), remote
viewing, out of body experiences, and other New Age and occult practices into U.S.
Military intelligence. Alexander's paper wat titled "The New Mental Battlefield: Beam
Me Up, Spock". "In
preparation for this article, EIR has interviewed a number of senior retired military
and intelligence officers, who have identified, form their own personal experiences,
a number of other leading military officers, who have promoted these efforts and
funneled massive amounts of Pentagon money into "black programs" (black
budget), testing the military applications of a whole range of bizarre "non-lethal"
techniques and technologies. some of the top-secret programs funded by taxpayer
dollars over the past 25 years betray a significant degree of outright "spoon-
bending" lunacy. Others lead directly to the doorsteps of Guantanamo Bay and Abu
Ghraib military detention centers, where prisoners have been turned into human
guinea pigs for experimental torture techniques, drawn from the same New Age bag
of tricks." "Gen.
Albert Stubblebine III was the head of U.S. Army Intelligence, INSCOM (Intelligence
and Security Command), from 1981 to 1984, during which time he launched a series
of secret projects at Fort Meade, Md. involving remote viewing and other occult
practices. General Stubblebine was perhaps, the U.S. Army's most senior and
loudest advocate of the full gamut of the New Age warfare." "Channon's First Earth Battalion
slide show was brought to General Stubblebine, the head of INSCOM, by Colonel
Alexander, the author of the Military Review article on "the New Mental Battlefield",
and, by 1981, Stubblebine established a secret "psychic spies unit" at Fort Meade,
to test out such dubious techniques as remote viewing." </div> <hr style="width: 100%; height:
2px;">War Crimes by marsboy683
http://marsboy683.wordpress.com/2009/04/04/war-crimes-
4pgs/ "In 1993 the National Institute of Justice, (part of the Department
of Justice DOJ) began the "NIJ initiative on Less-Than-Lethal Weapons",
recommending that state and local police department in American utilize
psychotropic, and electromagnetic weapons against American citizens involved in
"domestic disturbances". the report said, "Short term research will be completed to
adopt military technology to use by domestic law enforcement... including laser,
microwave, and electromagnetic weapons". The Washington Post reported, "The
Pentagon and the DOJ have agreed to share state-of-the-art military weapons with
civilian law enforcement agencies, including exotic "non-lethal weapons".
 </div> <hr style="width:
100%; height: 2px;">Thursday, July 2, 2009 8:45:29 PM To My Captors and Mind Control Handlers: <div style="text-
align: justify;">1.The
constitution guarantees the right of the people to be secure in their person. The
Declaration of Independence asserts as self-evident that all men have certain
inalienable rights and that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of
happiness. 2. As Supreme Court Justice Louis
Brandeis wrote in 1928, "the framers of the Constitution sought "to protect
Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions, and their sensations." It is
for this reason they established, as against the government, the right to be let alone
as "the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by men".
style="font-family: Verdana;">3. The first principle of the Nurembert Code state
that with respect to human research, the valuntary consent of the human subject is
absolutely essential. The Nuremberg Code further asserts that such consent must
be competent, informed, and comprehensive. 4. There
are current regulations implementing the obligations of the United States to adhere
to Article 3 fo the United Nations Convention Against Torture and other Formes of
Cruel, Inhumane or Degrading Treatment including all terms that are subject to any
reservations, understandings, declarations, and provisions contained in the United
States Senate resolution of ratification of the Convention. Saturday, June 20,
2009 12:40:07 PM - WE
APOLOGIZE; HOWEVER WE HAVE LOST OUR ACCESS TO THE INTERNET AND WILL
NOT BE UPDATING OUR WEBSITE UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE. <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;">Notice
and Disclaimer: <div
style="text-align: justify;">Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered,
defamed, and publicly discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower)
with allegations of misconduct and fraud within International Signal & Control,
Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via South Africa and
a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation
and the truth without the aid of law enforcement and the media, which would
normally prosecute and expose public corruption. We utilize our communications to
thwart further libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our property, and our
business. We continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and some
communications are a means of protecting our rights to continue our pursuit of
justice. Advanced Media Group is also a member of the media. PRESS RELEASE Wednesday, May
20, 2009 6:22:37 PM Lancaster, Pennsylvania, Advanced Media Group and
Stan J. Caterbone Proposed ORGANIZED STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY
WEAPONS HARASSMENT BILL to Pennsylvania House of Representative Mike Sturla
(Lancaster, Pennsylvania) and City of Lancaster Mayor Richard Gray.
 <div style="text-align: justify;">The draft legislation is the work of
Missouri House of Representative Jim Guest, who has been working on helping
victims of these horrendous crimes for years. The bill will provide protections to
individuals who are being harassed, stalked, harmed by surveillance, and assaulted;
as well as protections to keep individuals from becoming human research subjects,
tortured, and killed by electronic frequency devices, directed energy devices,
implants, and directed energy weapons. Stan J. Caterbone has been a victim of organized stalking since
1987 and a victim of electronic and direct energy weapons since 2005. Stan J.
Caterbone will help introduce measures that also pertain to remote viewing; mental
telepathy and synthetic telepathy in more detail. Personal accounts of his pain and
torture are also filed in various United States federal and state courts.
Verdana;">Click Here to
Download Draft of Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons
Bill and list of Pennsylvania Representatives. We are urging you to contact your local
representatives and support our efforts to pass this legislation. Below you will find
the listings of Pennslvania Stae Representatives. For More Information Please
Contact Us At: scaterbone@live.com The following is a draft of the legislation:
Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons Bill
 </div> Section 1. Short
Title This bill may be cited as the Organized Stalking and Directed
Energy Devices and Weapons Bill" A) Findings
Verdana;">1) The constitution
guarantees the right of the people to be secure in their person. The Declaration of
Independence asserts as self-evident that all men have certain inalienable rights
and that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of
happiness. 2) As Supreme Court Justice Louis
Brandeis wrote in 1928, the framers of the Constitution sought "to protect
Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions, and their sensations." It is
for this reason that they established, as against the government, the right to be let
alone as "the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized
men. 3) The first principle of the Nuremberg Code states
that with respect to human research, the voluntary consent of the human subject is
absolutely essential. The Nuremberg Code further asserts that such consent must
be competent, informed, and comprehending. 4) There
are current regulations implementing the obligations of the United States to adhere
to Article 3 of the United Nations Convention Against Torture and other Forms of
Cruel, Inhumane or Degrading Treatment including all terms that are Subject to any
reservations, understandings, declarations, and provisions contained in the United
Verdana;">States Senate
resolution of ratification of the Convention. B) Purpose To establish regulations and penalties for those who use any type
of electronic frequency devices, directed energy devices, implants, surveillance
technology, and directed energy weapon to purposefully cause any of the following:
stalking, harassing, mental or physical harm, injury, harmful surveillance, torture,
diseases, and death to any United States citizen. Section 3. Organized Stalking If two or more persons willfully,
maliciously, and repeatedly follow or willfully and maliciously harass another person
and who make a credible threat with the intent to place that person in reasonable
fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family, they are
guilty of the crime of organized stalking, punishable by imprisonment in a county
jail for not more than one year, or by not more than one thousand dollars ($ 1,000),
or by both that fine and imprisonment, or by imprisonment in a federal prison.
Verdana;">If two or more
persons violate subdivision (a) when there is a temporary restraining order,
injunction, or any other court order in effect prohibiting the behavior described in
subdivision (a) against the same party, they shall be punished by imprisonment in
the state prison for two, three, or four years. For the purposes of this section, "harass" means
engages in a knowing and willful course of conduct directed at a specific person that
seriously alarms, annoys, torments, or terrorizes the person, or damages his
personal property or possessions and that serves no legitimate purpose. * * *
Verdana;">For the purposes
of this section, "course of conduct" means two or more acts occurring over a period
of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose. Constitutionally
protected activity is not included within the meaning of "course of conduct."
Verdana;">For the purposes
of this section, "credible threat" means a verbal or written threat, including that
performed through the use of an electronic communication device, or a threat
implied by a pattern of conduct or a combination of verbal, written, or electronically
communicated statements and conduct, made with the intent to place the person
that is the target of the threat in reasonable fear for his or her safety or the safety
of his or her family, or personal property or possessions and made with the
apparent ability to carry out the threat so as to cause the person who is the target
of the threat to reasonably fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family
or personal property or possessions. It is not necessary to prove that the defendant
had the intent to actually carry out the threat. The present incarceration of a person
making the threat shall not be a bar to prosecution under this section.
Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the meaning of "credible
threat." For purposes of
this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited
to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers
or synthetic telepathy devices. The sentencing court also shall consider issuing an order
restraining the defendant from any contact with the victim, that may be valid for up
to 10 years, as determined by the court. It is the intent of the Legislature that the
length of any restraining order be based upon the seriousness of the facts before
the court, the probability of future violations, and the safety of the victim and his or
her immediate family. For purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse,
parent, child, any person related by consanguinity or affinity within the second
degree, or any other person who regularly resides in the household, or who, within
the prior six months, regularly resided in the household. Section 4. Punishment for threats
Verdana;">Any person or
persons who willfully threatens to commit a crime which will result in death or great
bodily injury to another person, with the specific intent that the statement, made
verbally, in writing, or by means of an electronic communication device, is to be
taken as a threat, even if there is no intent of actually carrying it out, which, on its
face and under the circumstances in which it is made, is so unequivocal,
unconditional, immediate, and specific as to convey to the person threatened, a
gravity of purpose and an immediate prospect of execution of the threat, and
thereby causes that person reasonably to be in sustained fear for his or her own
safety or for his or her immediate family's safety, shall be punished by
imprisonment in a federal prison not to exceed one year.. For the purposes of this section,
"immediate family" means any spouse, whether by marriage or not, parent, child,
any person related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any
other person who regularly resides in the household, or who, within the prior six
months, regularly resided in the household. "Electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited to,
telephones, cellular telephones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers
or synthetic telepathy devices. Obscene, threatening or annoying communication
Verdana;">(a) Every person
or persons who, with intent to annoy, telephones or makes constant contact by
means of an electronic communication device with another and addresses to or
about the other person any obscene language or addresses to the other person any
threat to inflict injury to the person or any member of his or her family, or any
property or personal possessions is guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in this
subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts made in good faith.
Verdana;">(b) Every person
or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by
means of an electronic communication device with intent to annoy another person
at his or her residence, is, whether or not conversation ensues from making the
telephone call or electronic contact, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in this
subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts made in good faith.
Verdana;">(c) Every person
or persons who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by
means of an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another
person at his or her place of work is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of
not more than one thousand dollars ($ 1,000), or by imprisonment in a federal
prison for not more than one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment. Nothing
in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts made in good
faith. This subdivision applies only if one or both of the following circumstances
exist: (1) There is a
temporary restraining order, an injunction, or any other court order, or any
combination of these court orders, in effect prohibiting the behavior described in
this section. (2) The
person or persons makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by
means of an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another
person at his or her place of work, totaling more than 10 times in a 24-hour period,
whether or not conversation ensues from making the telephone call or electronic
contact, and the repeated telephone calls or electronic contacts are made to the
workplace of an adult or fully emancipated minor who is a spouse, former spouse,
cohabitant, former cohabitant, or person with whom the person has a child or has
had a dating or engagement relationship or is having a dating or engagement
relationship. (d) Any
offense committed by use of a telephone may be deemed to have been committed
where the telephone call or calls were made or received. Any offense committed by
use of an electronic communication device or medium, including the Internet, may
be deemed to have been committed when the electronic communication or
communications were originally sent or first viewed by the recipient.
Verdana;">(e) Subdivision
(a), (b), or (c) is violated when the person acting with intent to annoy makes a
telephone call requesting a return call and performs the acts prohibited under
subdivision (a), (b), or (c) upon receiving the return call. (f) If probation is granted, or the
execution or imposition of sentence is suspended, for any person or persons
convicted under this section, the court may order as a condition of probation that
the person participate in counseling. (g) For purposes of this section, the term "electronic
communication device" includes, but is not limited to, telephones, cellular phones,
computers, video recorders, fax machines, pagers or synthetic telepathy devices.
Verdana;">Section 5. Assault
and battery with an electronic or directed energy weapon Any person or persons who in the
course of organized stalking and harassment, commits an assault upon the person
of another with an unauthorized directed energy weapon shall be punished by
imprisonment in a federal prison for two, three, or four years or by a fine not
exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000). For the purposes of this section the term directed energy weapon
is defined as any device that directs a source of energy (including molecular or
atomic energy, subatomic particle beams, electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or
extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy radiation)
against a person or any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means of
inflicting death or injury; or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life,
bodily health, mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person via
land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic,
psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or
targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or
mind control of such persons or populations; or by expelling chemical or biological
agents in the vicinity of a person. </div><hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px; margin-left: 0px;
margin-right: 0px;"><div style="text-align: justify;"> Thursday,
February 12, 2009 3:34:39 PM My father, Samuel Caterbone (U.S. Navy; deceased
2001), Jr., by brother Samuel A. Caterbone (U.S. Air Force; deceased 1984) and
myself, Stanley J. Caterbone (Federal Whistleblower 1987 on ISC ; DOD Contractor
& ISC Shareholder 1983 to 1987) are all victims of MK-Ultra (Mind Control) or
one of its 149 subprograms. My father was telepathic
(Remote Viewing & Shock Therapy) and ; my brother was administered LSD
while in the Air Force in the 1960's; and of course I am telepathic (Remote Viewing)
and been subjected to torture. Wednesday,
February 11, 2009 11:11:24 AM "S.A.I.C.
involvement in 1993 American Para psychological Association meeting
arrangements, via their 'Cognitive Sciences Laboratory'. Science Applications
International Corporation is a big time defense contractor, has held the largest
number of research contracts of any defense contractor. Bobby Ray Inman (ISC
Board of Directors) is on its board of directors, among others." by John Porter, CIA Program on Mind Control copyright 1996
Verdana;">***"In 1994, after
Bobby Ray Inman requested to be withdrawn from consideration as Bill Clinton's
first Defense Secretary, his critics speculated that the decision was motivated by a
desire to conceal his links to ISC. Inman was a member of the so-called "shadow
board" of the company which was allegedly either negligent or approved the
exports." by Wikipedia on International Signal and Control,
(ISC). </div><hr
style="width: 100%; height: 2px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px;"><div
style="text-align: justify;"> February 9, 2009
style="font-family: Verdana;">U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney
General Eastern District of Philadelphia 615 Chestnut Street Suite 1250 Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania 19106-4476 Re: Public Corruption; Violations of Civil Rights; RICO;
Civil and Criminal Conspiracy; Extortion; Etc., Defendants: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania;
President Judge William Johnstone, Jr.,; Lancaster City Police Department;
Pennsylvania State Police; Lancaster County District Attorney Office; Lancaster
County Probation Office Dear United States Attorney: Enclosed is a complaint form and complaint for the above-
mentioned violations. I am the son of Samuel Caterbone Jr., and have already filed a
complaint regarding persons and officials of the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania,
which involved Fulton Bank that you received via certified mail on or about
December 9, 2008. I am also claiming a Federal False Claims Act Violation regarding
International Signal and Control, from 1987 that you may find referenced in the
District Court for Eastern Pennsylvania. I have recently withdrawn all of my federal
suits due to a long and protracted battle with obstruction of justice and interference
with my litigation. I have recently won a decision in the Third Circuit Court of
Appeals for case no. 07-4474, and withdrew the cases upon being returned to the
District Court for further litigation. You may research the cases in the Eastern
District Court and the Third Circuit for a background and history. I have been a pro
se litigant since 2005. On February 4, 2009 I came upon an order that was imposed against my
father on August 29, 1973 by President Judge William Johnstone, Jr. of the Lancaster
County Court of Common Pleas(Cases No. 301 306-1973 and 1258-1972); that
causes great dismay and disbelief. At the same time this ORDER verifies my own
belief that dates back to 1987: the history of corruption and fraud concerning my
own trials and tribulations with the County of Lancaster regarding my civil and
criminal cases for the last 22 years were modeled after my fathers same
perpetrators and corruption that plagued his life. The ORDER reads: On this date, the Honorable
William G. Johnstone, Jr., President Judge directs that Samuel Caterbone, Jr., be
released from probation and that he leave the area around Lancaster County
(Penna.) as of August 29, 1973. Please remember, my father and mother, Yolanda Roda
Caterbone had six children; and all this time we all believed that my father had ran
out on us all. That was the story. Enclosed you will find my fathers criminal case,
with the exception of the trial transcript, which I had requested on Friday from the
Lancaster County Court Reporters Office. There are several criminal allegations that I am making. First, the
only charge my father was guilty of was forging his own companies check, Samuel
Caterbone Cleaners (ironically only one in evidence - for divorce proceedings to an
attorney). Secondly, I dont believe there is any law that can support this order,
especially considering he at the time was the father of six children and not legally
divorced or separated. Thirdly, in the documents you will find a letter from the law
firms of May, Grove, Stork, & Blakinger that is dissolution of my fathers
company Samuel Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., dated September 30,
1974. You will notice that
current President Judge Louis J. Farina of the Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas is a member. It is quite suspicious that during our 48th year, we both were
illegally incarcerated and falsely imprisoned in the Lancaster County Prison during
the months of October; November; and December. My father did at least 5 months,
while I only had to do 2. I am also alleging public corruption
by President Judge Farina in my own cases. The last and most notable is the
Superior Court Appeal No. 113 MDA 2008; whereby President Judge Farina refused
several motions to dismiss court appointed counsel William Campbell prior to the
November 19, 2008 ORDER to dismiss my appeal due to Court Appointed Attorney
William Campbell for failing to file a brief. Jack Storks wife was Mayor of the City of Lancaster during the
1990s. She was in a position to cover-up my accusations, which she did back then. I
have a letter to her dating back to 1991-1992. If you follow the history of Samuel Caterbone
Cleaners., Inc., you will find that during the last year of operation the plant went
through a tumultuous time of machinery breakdown, similar to my own experience
the last few years. Furthermore, the business and property that my father had built
and owned was sold for far less than it was worth at that time. I have the deeds and
related documents to prove this out. Now, if you follow my case history, you will find the same pattern
of crimes, with the absolute same outcome, loss of reputation, loss of income; loss
of property; loss of business interests; loss of social and personal friendships and
relationships; and most importantly a fabricated mental illness history.
Verdana;">Unfortunately,
there is but another complication, I am also alleging that my father, Samuel
Caterbone Jr., my brother Samuel Caterbone, and myself Stanley J. Caterbone are all
victims of the program MK-Ultra and or one of its subprograms. I have conclusive
evidence to support my allegation; however do not want to entangle this subject at
this time. I wish you
to only entertain the above referenced allegations at this time. I will await your
further instructions on how to proceed. Thank you for you time and considerations. I look forward to
working with you, as there is more to come. Respectfully, Stan J. Caterbone
 </div><hr style="width:
100%; height: 2px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px;"><div style="text-align:
justify;"> PRESS RELEASE Advanced Media Group February 4, 2009
 IS IT LEGAL TO THROW SOMEONE
OUT OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER? Lancaster, PA On August 29, 1973 Samuel Caterbone, Jr. (Father
of Stan J. Caterbone) was ORDERED by Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas
Judge William G. Johnstone to "leave the area around Lancaster County
Pennsylvania as of August 29, 1973 in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Caterbone,
Samuel (Docket No. 301 and 306 of 1973). A copy of the ORDER was found today,
February 4, 2009 in the Clerk of Courts at the Lancaster County Courthouse. It was
also found the Samuel Caterbone, Jr. was imprisoned from August of 1972 to
February of 1973 for the charges that were brought about by the Lancaster City
Police Department. The ORDER of August 29, 1973 reads: "On this date, the Honorable
William G. Johnstone, Jr., President Judge directs that Samuel Caterbone, Jr., be
released from probation and that he leave the area around Lancaster County
(Penna.) as of August 29, 1973" Samuel Caterbone, Jr. was found guilty by jury of signing two
checks from his business, Samuel Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., without the consent of
his wife, Yolanda M. Roda Caterbone. One check was made out for $200.00 to
attorney James Coho for divorce proceedings and the other check for $78.18 to Joe
the Motorist Friend at the Manor Shopping Center for a hunting rifle. He was
sentenced to one year probation and ordered to pay court costs (No fine: No
Restitution). Samuel
Caterbone, Jr. was found not guilty of stealing $2,200 from his nephew, Joseph
Ricupero III, former owner/developer of Strawberry Hill Restuarant, in the City of
Lancaster. Samuel Caterbone, Jr., appeared pro se and represented himself at trial.
Samuel Caterbone, Jr. testified in the arraignment that it was his money from the
beginning before President Judge Hensel Brown. </div><hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px; margin-left:
0px; margin-right: 0px;"><div style="text-align: justify;"> Click Here to see video of meeting with U.S. Senator Arlen
Specter on October 8, 2008 - Forward to end of
interview. For this article click here
style="font-family: Verdana;">http://www.raven1.net/mcsecsta.htm
justify;"> From NameBase NewsLine, No. 12, January-March
1996: Mind Control and the Secret
State Last September
the CIA confirmed the existence of a 20-year, $20 million research program in
"remote viewing," a sub variety of extrasensory perception. On October 29, a Jack
Anderson column added more details, and Ted Koppel of ABC's Nightline weighed in
with a program on November 28, by which time many newspapers and wire services
had picked up the story. By December, a number of pundits began lamenting this
additional evidence of the CIA's protean power to waste taxpayers' money.
Verdana;">Curiously, "remote
viewing" was an old story, first reported by Anderson himself on 23 April 1984.
Other Anderson columns of U.S. and Soviet interest in psychic research date back to
1981. Anderson's October 29 update reported that this project, which for a time was
contracted out to the Stanford Research Institute (SRI), had been scaled back and
put under Pentagon sponsorship, but nevertheless continued. Although the results
of these experiments were reportedly mixed, the project retains its defenders in
Congress: Sen. Claiborne Pell (D-RI) and Rep. Charlie Rose (D-NC). By 1995,
Anderson didn't have an opinion on the merits of this research, but his 1984 column
was supportive. On Nightline, former CIA director Robert Gates implied that pressure
from members of Congress drove the CIA's original involvement.
style="font-family: Verdana;">Another of Ted Koppel's CIA guests, identified only as
"Norm," was a technical advisor for CIA deputy director John McMahon and, until
1984, a coordinator for the SRI tests. "Norm" did mention the "eight-martini" results
from some experiments; this was an in-house term for remote-viewing results so
uncannily successful that observers needed eight martinis to recover. Still, the
general impression from Koppel's show was dismissive. Only about "fifteen percent"
of the experiments, panelists repeated, produced accurate results. Gates argued
that such research, if undertaken at all, belongs in the academy.
 Not for the first time, however, there's more to this story than Ted Koppel
acknowledges. Ingo
Swann, who was involved in the SRI project from 1972-1988, is upset with the
media's droll treatment of this revived story. Swann points out that the original
motivation behind the "remote viewing" project was the fear that the Soviets were
investing significant resources in applied psychic research, and might be making
advances. At the time, at least, such a rationale would have been considered a
plausible one to justify such a small expenditure of intelligence money.
Nevertheless, almost all mention of this element of the story, which had figured
prominently in the first wave of stories on "remote viewing," was dropped in 1995.
Verdana;">Furthermore,
Swann claims, the "fifteen percent" figure, established early in the SRI project,
represented the baseline accuracy for non-gifted and untrained persons. U.S.
intelligence wanted sixty-five percent accuracy, and in the later stages of the
project, Swann claims, "this accuracy level was achieved and often consistently
exceeded." According to Swann, the key players in the project, and the
documentation supporting the real story, remain under the strictest security
constraints. However
this may be, Anderson's October 29 story reminds us that ESP is very much alive as
an object of intelligence-community interest. In addition to "remote viewing" (seeing
people, places, and events at a distance in space and time), another area of interest
is the supposed power of "micro psycho- kinesis" or "Micro-PK" -- the ability to affect
small objects, such as electrical systems, by using the mind. Micro-PK is one step
away from outright telekinesis, and its supposed power has obvious attractions for
the CIA. Imagine being able to erase a computer tape from a block away, or
interfere with the avionics of a jet fighter, or detonate a warhead.
style="font-family: Verdana;">Based on the evidence that's on the public record,
the dream of harnessing such power, or even of establishing its existence, may be
somewhat optimistic. But this fact hasn't stopped a strange band of specialists, many of whom
have government connections, from staking out careers at the intersection of, so to
speak, ESP, the Pentagon, and the CIA: where people interested in parapsychology
work with those interested in weapons research and mind control. These would-be
psi-spooks turn up occasionally on talk shows and at conferences on "non-lethal
defense." Their ranks include companies like PSI- TECH in Albuquerque, founded by
Maj. Edward A. Dames, and figures such as Col. John B. Alexander of the Los Alamos
National Laboratory, who was featured in the February 1995 issue of Wired
magazine. Dames and Alexander and a dozen more blend in with spookier types
who shun publicity but who show up at UFO and New Age gatherings. One is ex-
Naval Intelligence officer C.B. Scott Jones, a former aide to Sen. Claiborne Pell.
Verdana;">Once again, it's
likely that Ted Koppel doesn't have the whole story. It's also likely that he wouldn't
be cleared to report it if he did. Still, the piddling pool of dollars so far devoted to
this research strongly implies that, if the figure is accurate, intelligence-funded
parapsychological research has been a bust. The uncounted millions the CIA has spent on mind
control suggest just the opposite. As with "remote viewing," the attraction of a
successful mind control program to the CIA is obvious, and has long been explicitly
acknowledged as such. The "Manchurian Candidate" scenario -- in which a
programmed zombie-assassin responds to a post-hypnotic trigger, performs the act,
and does not remember it later -- is one ideal type of successful mind control. A
reliable truth serum, long the object of a CIA quest, would be another. Both of these
are operational uses of mind control, its so-called "second front."
Verdana;">This term comes
from former CIA director Allen Dulles. In 1953, Dulles, speaking before a national
meeting of Princeton alumni, distinguished two fronts in the then-current "battle for
men's minds": a "first front" of mass indoctrination through censorship and
propaganda, and a "second front" of individual "brainwashing" and "brain
changing." Before an audience of fellow Ivy Leaguers, Dulles skipped the usual
pieties about democracy. The same year, Dulles approved the CIA's notorious
MKULTRA project, and exempted it from normal CIA financial controls.
Verdana;">The distinction
between Dulles's "two fronts" eventually becomes diffi-cult to sustain, like the
distinction between, say, sociology and psychology. Still, this distinction can be
useful in roughing out a spectrum of known mindcontrol techniques.
Verdana;">For example, one
powerful tool for inducing ideological and behavioral change is social pressure in a
controlled environment. The "brainwashing" employed during the Korean War did
not involve the use drugs or hypnosis. The Chinese merely used the same
techniques that they employed on the population at large, but with more intensity,
greater control, and additional rewards and punishments such as food and sleep
deprivation. Yet this frighteningly simple program was enough to crank up the
brainwashing scare in the U.S. Some researchers now suspect that this hysterical
episode had its origins in CIA- generated propaganda, designed to give the CIA the
political space needed to research more sophisticated mind-control techniques.
Verdana;">Many
undergraduates learn about the experiments conducted by Solomon Asch in the
1950s, which demonstrated that expressed opinions can be easily manipulated by
social pressure, even in obvious cases, such as whether Line A is longer than Line B
on a particular card. And Stanley Milgram showed that many unwitting research
subjects would administer a series of escalating electric shocks to another, even to
the point of an apparent heart attack, simply because a white-coated lab assistant
asked them to continue. Milgram's research suggests that a "Manchurian
Candidate" already exists in many of us, and that all that's required to bring him out
may be a bit of propaganda. The historical evidence for blind human obedience that
could be cited here is very familiar, and very depressing. Still, there's evidence that Pentagon
planners are uneasy about potential unruliness among the mass populations Dulles
identified as mind control's "first front." Princeton alumni may perhaps follow and
accept arguments that U.S. interests are at stake in Bosnia, but their sons are
unlikely to be on the scene defending those supposed interests. The urban or
Appalachian infantryman, and the family he comes from, may have other ideas.
Verdana;">Elite unease on
this point may lie behind Pentagon enthusiasm for the new wrinkle in military force
that goes by the name "non-lethal" or "less-than- lethal." Its very claim to embody a
"humanitarian" form of warfare is a weapon in Dulles's "battle for men's minds."
Verdana;">Non-lethal
technology becomes important in a discussion of mind control, as it involves
something very close to it, in a form which might be used to control large
populations. The propaganda aspect of "humanitarian warfare" is merely a
sideshow; it's the technology itself that enlists the enthusiasm of Pentagon planners
and law enforcement officials. Much of this "friendly force" technology involves
electromagnetic fields and directed-energy radiation, and ultrasound or infrasound
weapons -- the same tech-nology that's currently of interest in brain-stimulation and
mind-control research. A partial list of aggressive promoters of this new technology includes
Oak Ridge National Lab, Sandia National Laboratories, Science Applications
International Corporation, MITRE Corporation, Lawrence Livermore National Lab, and
Los Alamos National Laboratory. In the 1996 defense authorization bill, Congress
earmarked $37.2 million to investigate non-lethal technologies. And this money
looks like a mere ante in the game. U.S. interest in this "less-than-lethal" technology dates back to
the early 1960s, when the State Department became aware of low-energy
microwave radiation directed at the U.S. embassy in Moscow. Under the name
"Project Pandora," secret research into the Moscow radiation continued for ten years
-- before embassy employees were informed that they were on the receiving end.
Researchers initially assumed that the microwaves were designed to activate
bugging devices. But when a large number of illnesses were reported at the
embassy, a review of Soviet scientific journals revealed that the Soviets believed
microwaves affected cell membranes and increased the excitability of nerve cells.
Officially, the incidence of illness at the embassy was ultimately blamed on the U.S.
short-wave transmitting antenna on the embassy roof, which leaked energy and
contributed to the unhealthy environment. Still, the secrecy surrounding Project
Pandora encouraged further speculation within the U.S. intelligence community and
elsewhere. For instance, researchers knew that a low-energy microwave beam could
be modulated with an "audiogram," and actually convey a recognizable message
into an irradiated brain. This led some U.S. spooks to suspect that the Soviets had
been attempting to practice mind control on the embassy staff. Such history brings us back to the
situation of the restless public in our own jittery, pre-millennial U.S. Today, there
seems to be a dramatic increase in the number of "wavies," those who feel they are
being harassed by non-ionizing radiation such as radio or sound waves.
Nevertheless, there is little evidence to support their belief that the secret state,
despite its obvious interest in non-lethal technology, is supporting applied research
on unsuspecting average citizens. Several alternative explanations suggest
themselves. First of all,
the treatment of mental illness over the past few decades has changed dramatically
-- from an institutional approach, to an out-patient, community-based system that
relies on prescription drugs to control symptoms and behavior. Greater numbers of
sufferers of paranoia, freed from institutions, are also free to exercise their First
Amendment rights. Furthermore, the power to express oneself has been enhanced
by technology -- everything from personal photocopying machines and desktop
publishing, to fax machines and now the Internet. And on the Internet, almost
everyone can find soul mates. And "wavies" can make the case that they deserve the benefit of
a doubt. Revelations about the Cold War secret state, from the CIA documents
released in the 1970s to last year's Advisory Committee on Human Radiation
Experiments (which investigated ionizing radiation only), have produced a social
environment in which it can seem diffi-cult to rule out anyone's claim, no matter
how paranoid-sounding. Finally, there is the modern problem of "pollution" in the
broadest sense: from electromagnetic and chemical, and including simple noise.
Human reactions to this pollution, which is a new phenomenon in the history of our
species, apparently vary by orders of magnitude. Those who are ultra-sensitive may
feel harassed, even if no one is intentionally targeting them. To a disinterested observer, the
claims of the "wavies" are perhaps no more bizarre than the claims of those who
have experienced profound religious conversions. The point is not to be-little
anyone's beliefs, but rather to establish that social factors often determine what we
consider to be credible. For thousands of years societies have found it useful to
allow sufficient space for religion. Only recently has social space opened up for the
claims of "wavies." The increase in their numbers is thus predictable, irrespective of
whether the secret state is behind their problems or not. (It isn't, in my opinion.)
Verdana;">This brings us to
the "second front" mentioned by Allen Dulles in 1953: the technology of mind
control applied on an individual level. Whereas non- ionizing radiation can be
"broad-cast" to large populations, techniques such as psychosurgery, implants, and
electronic stimulation of the brain (ESB) are administered on a case-by-case basis.
More exotic techniques, whose scientific status and potential effectiveness remain
uncertain, include radio hypnotic intra-cerebral control and hypnotic dissolution of
memory (RHIC-EDOM), and the use of induced "screen memory" and multiple
personality disorder (MPD) for cover purposes. The closest parallel to the "wavies" within this second
front include those who feel that implants were forced on them, sometimes during
childhood. Such beliefs obviously tap deep fears in the popular psyche. The season
premier of "The X Files" showed FBI agent Scully discovering that someone had
planted a microchip near the base of her skull. And accused Oklahoma City bomber
Timothy McVeigh apparently claims that an implant was inserted under his skin, for
tracking purposes, during the Gulf War. Identification implants, which are passive devices that respond to
an energy source and return an identification number, are similar to the bar codes
at the checkout counter in a grocery store. Today's pet owners can have these
devices implanted in their pets. But anyone who confuses this simple technology
with a chip that tells them what to do is already in trouble. Such a person should
consider turning off the television, logging off the Internet, and checking out a few
books from the local library. ID technology is ominous for those concerned with
surveillance and privacy, but it has little to do with mind control.
Verdana;">Granted, there are
experimental "stimoceiver" implants that can stimulate the brain through
electrodes. Mind-control enthusiast Jose Delgado became briefly famous when he
stopped a charging bull in its tracks with such a device in 1964. Even allowing for
electronic miniaturization since then, or for the fact that finely-tuned microwaves
can achieve the same results as implanted electrodes, ESB would still seem to
impractical as a mind-control device. At best it appears to stimulate various
emotions, and might be used for behavioral conditioning in a controlled
environment. This is still quite crude as a control device. It would be simpler and
more reliable to arrange a fatal accident. The combination of surveillance technology and implanted
aversion therapy conjures up the vision of a society of victim-robots, with monitors
on every utility pole and computers administering the conditioning. But the
necessary infrastructure would be frightfully expensive. And no doubt unnecessary. Suffi-cient control over the flow of
information in society can yield results very similar to those that could be achieved
by mind-control implants installed in every individual. Thus the flaw in the reasoning
of many researchers: the mind-control techniques that have them so worried are
usually the most difficult techniques one can possibly imagine. For those who would
seek total control, plain, old-fashioned information control -- leavened with a few
fascist techniques -- will do nicely, thank you. In 1973, former MKULTRA researcher Louis Jolyon
"Jolly" West, from the Department of Psychiatry at UCLA, convinced California and
federal officials to sponsor a Violence Center. Governor Ronald Reagan mentioned
the proposed Center in glowing terms in a speech on January 11, and the federal
Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (LEAA) approved a $750,000 grant. By
this time the federal government, through LEAA, the National Institute of Mental
Health (NIMH), the Bureau of Prisons, and the CIA, was operating or funding
numerous behavior modification programs in prisons, schools, and hospitals. In
response to protests from UCLA students and faculty, the LEAA announced that it
would ban the use of its funds for "psychosurgery, medical research, behavior
modification -- including aversion therapy -- and chemotherapy."
Verdana;">A year later Louis
West was still hoping to obtain funds from NIMH, but by then it was too late for his
proposal. Until the 1970s it was not unusual for mental health professionals to
propose programs that would screen children for the purpose of early diagnosis and
treatment of the potentially violent. But by the 1970s the trend was in the other
direction, as some states enacted laws that made it more difficult to confine
someone involuntarily as a mental patient. By the 1990s the shoe is securely on the
other foot. Twenty
years ago it was fashionable for clinicians to blame urban unrest and similar
phenomena on the behavior of individuals. Now, however, the individual can
disclaim responsibility for his actions by blaming external agencies. Numerous
persons have gone public with accusations of strange events during their childhood,
suggesting that they were used as guinea pigs for mysterious men in white coats.
Some of their evidence seems sufficiently solid to require further investigation, and
more cases are emerging all the time. On 15 March 1995, two patients of New Orleans therapist Valerie
Wolf testified before the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments.
Although this was outside the purview of the Committee, they were permitted to
testify because some of the names of CIA-connected researchers they mentioned
were already familiar to the Committee. These two women remembered sessions
when they were around eight years old that involved electric shocks, hypnosis,
shots with needles, x-rays, sexual abuse, and even training in intelligence
tradecraft. One case occurred from 1972-1976 and the other in 1958. This
testimony was not covered by the media. Although the recollections of the two women were spontaneous
and did not involve regression therapy, there is also a cottage industry developing
around memories of child abuse in general. For the most part these are not
connected with government research, and perhaps many are the result of question-
able techniques used by social workers, therapists, police and prosecutors to elicit
testimony from children. Juries are becoming more skeptical of many of these cases.
This issue has even assumed the dimensions of a religious crusade -- Christian
fundamentalists worry about evil in the New Age movement, and are on the lookout
for cases of "satanic ritual abuse" of children. Others believe the CIA has turned
children into split-personality sex slaves for operational use. In 1992 the False Memory
Syndrome Foundation began in Philadelphia. This organization criticizes the practice
of regression therapy when it's used to bring out memories of traumatic childhood
experiences. FMSF considers these repressed memories of incest and sexual abuse
to be objectively false, and devastating to family life in general. There's a growing
split over this issue among psychology professionals. To confuse the situation
further, FMSF has some on their Board of Advisors who may want to cover up their
own work. One is Louis West, another is Martin Orne, one of the key MKULTRA
researchers in hypnosis, and a third is Michael Persinger, who did research on the
effects of electromagnetic radiation on the brain for a Pentagon weapons project.
Verdana;">Regression
therapy could be a threat to the techniques the CIA may have secretly developed
involving the use of hypnosis. Shortly after Pearl Harbor, George Estabrooks,
chairman of the Department of Psychology at Colgate University, was called to
Washington by the War Department. As one of the leading authorities on hypnosis,
Estabrooks was asked to evaluate how it might be used by the enemy. In 1943 he
wrote a book, expanded in a second edition fourteen years later, that included a
discussion of the use of hypnotism in warfare. In his opinion, one in five adult
humans are capable of being placed in a trance so deep that they will have no
memory of it. They could be hypnotized secretly by using a disguised technique,
and given a post-hypnotic suggestion. Estabrooks suggested that a dual personality
could be constructed with hypnosis, thereby creating the perfect double agent with
an unshakable cover. Estabrooks' theories regarding
hypnosis are disputed by many experts today. Frequently the entire topic is
dismissed with the notion, promoted by Martin Orne and others, that a hypnotist
cannot induce a person to perform an act that this person would otherwise find
objectionable. But this in itself appears to be a cover story; if the trance is deep
enough, an imaginary social environment can be constructed through which an
otherwise objectionable act becomes necessary and heroic. Murdering Hitler during
wartime would not be considered criminal, for example. It may even be easier than
this: in 1951 in Denmark, Palle Hardrup robbed a bank and killed a guard, and then
claimed that hypnotist Bjorn Nielsen told him to do it. Nielsen eventually confessed
that Hardrup was a test of his hypnotic techniques, which included telling Hardrup
that the money from the robbery was a means to a noble end. Hardrup had become
Nielsen's robot, and Nielsen was convicted. In 1976 a book by
Donald Bain titled "The Control
of Candy Jones" was published by Playboy Press. This one-of-a-kind
book is the story Candy Jones, who was America's leading cover girl during the
forties and fifties. In 1960 Jones fell on hard times and agreed to act as a courier for
the CIA. An excellent subject for hypnosis, Jones became the plaything of a CIA
psychiatrist who used her to exhibit his mastery of mind-control techniques. This
psychiatrist used hypnosis and drugs to develop a second personality within Jones
over a period of 12 years. This second personality took the form of a courier who
could be triggered by telephone with particular sounds, and after the mission was
completed and the normal personality resumed, did not remember anything.
Verdana;">These missions
were elaborate, and frequently involved world travel to deliver messages. According
to the book, Jones and other victims were once even subjected to torture at a
seminar at CIA headquarters, as a means of demonstrating this psychiatrist's
control over his subjects. Jones married New York radio talk-show host Long John Nebel in 1972. An
amateur hypnotist, Nebel stumbled onto her secret personality, and began
unraveling the story over many subsequent sessions. Author Donald Bain, a family
friend, was invited to reconstruct the story from more than 200 hours of taped
sessions between Jones and Nebel. Various researchers have confirmed some pieces
of the story, but Bain did not name the major CIA psychiatrist involved, nor did he
name a second psychiatrist who Martin Cannon recently identified this second
psychiatrist as the late William Kroger, who was an associate of Louis West, Martin
Orne, and another MKULTRA veteran, H.J. Eysenck. Whatever the truth is behind
Candy Jones -- and it's difficult to see the book as an elaborate hoax -- there's no
question that hypnotist George Estabrooks raised issues that the CIA took seriously
in secret research for at least 25 years. The MKULTRA
implementing documents specified that "additional avenues to the control of human
behavior" were to include "radiation, electroshock, various fields of psychology,
sociology, and anthropology, graphology, harassment substances, and paramilitary
devices and materials." The word "radiation" gave the Advisory Committee on
Human Radiation Experiments a reason to request a search of records on human
experimentation from the CIA. Their final report, released last October, expressed
dissatisfaction with the CIA's response, and recommended that the CIA get their act
together so that legitimate requests can be accommodated better in the future.
Verdana;">One problem is
the compartmentation of the CIA's record-keeping systems. Another is that the CIA
immediately decided that the Committee's purview was restricted only to ionizing
radiation -- the type of radiation of interest in nuclear testing, as opposed to the
electromagnetic and sound waves that might be used for mind control. Finally,
those documents that the CIA did release were heavily redacted. The Committee
noted that they had "received numerous queries about MKULTRA and the other
related programs from scholars, journalists, and citizens who have
style="font-family: Verdana;"><a class="RE" style="font-
family: Verdana;"
href="http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/index.htm"
target="_blank">(The CIA's Program of MK-ULTRA or Mind Control and Manipulation)
(Click Here) </a> JOINT HEARING BEFORE THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE AND THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON HEALTH AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH OF THE
COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RESOURCES UNITED STATES SENATE NINETY-FIFTH
CONGRESS FIRST SESSION AUGUST 3, 1977 Printed for the use
of the Select Committee on Intelligence and Committee on
Human Resources U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING
OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1977 For sale by the
Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government
Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock No.
052-070-04357-1 Lancaster County
Court of Common Pleas President Judge Louis J. Farina Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge James P. Cullen
style="font-family: Verdana;">Lancaster County Detective Michael Landis
style="font-family: Verdana;">MIND CONTROL and the Black Budget Program
MKultra. INTELLIGENCER
JOURNAL (LANCASTER, PA.) February 4, 2004, Wednesday SECTION: NEWS, Pg. A-1 LENGTH: 938 words HEADLINE: Convicted
killer says he's conspiracy victim; Judge hears testimony on Zook's mental
state BYLINE: Thomas L. Flannery
Verdana;">Convicted killer
Robert P. Zook Jr. took the stand Tuesday during the second day of a hearing to
determine if he is mentally capable of helping his attorney's efforts to get him off
death row Zook was convicted of two counts of first-degree murder in 1986 and
sentenced to death for killing 55-year-old typewriter repairman Paul Conard and the
repairman's 19-year-old girlfriend, Sandra Wiker, during a botched robbery at
Conard's North Queen Street shop. On Tuesday, under questioning by his attorney, James Moreno of
the Defender Association of Philadelphia, Zook told Farina he is an innocent
man. Zook said his
attorneys are trying to have him executed as part of a conspiracy concocted by
former District Attorney Joseph Madenspacher, now a county judge, and retired
Lancaster Bureau of Police Chief Michael Landis, now a county detective. Zook
claims the two men plotted with the "radio community" and had transmitters
implanted in his head and abdomen. The transmitters,
Zook said, have been used to monitor his every move and record his thoughts and
his speech. He said the recordings are listened to by a bevy of "outlaw radio stars"
that populate the county. Zook, a hulking man who weighs about 300 pounds and is fully tattooed,
told Moreno he has no idea who killed Conard and Wiker, his distant cousin.
Verdana;">"Did the "radio
community' set you up?" Moreno asked. "Yes sir," Zook said. Zook was polite, calm and deliberate as he
talked about a conspiracy that extended to his entire family and included Moreno.
Zook told Farina he knows about the implants because of the images he sees from
behind his eyelids, and voices that speak to him from the implants. On Tuesday,
Philadelphia psychiatrist Dr. Robert Sodoff testified that Zook's mental status has
deteriorated to a point where Zook is so delusional and distrustful of Moreno that he
cannot assist in his own defense. Sodoff told Farina that Zook believes he has a
computer chip implanted in his head and a two-way transmitter in his abdomen so
authorities can monitor his every move and communicate with him, all part of an
elaborate plot Moreno helped concoct in 1979. In 1979, Moreno was a college
freshman. Sodoff also said it is highly unlikely Zook has been faking his delusions for
more than five years, when they first surfaced. A psychiatrist called by the defense Tuesday agreed
with Sodoff's assessment. However, Dr. Timothy Michaels, a forensic psychiatrist
called by Deputy Attorney General Jonelle Eshbach, who is prosecuting Zook at the
appellate level, said Zook, despite the alleged delusions, can cooperate and help his
attorneys -- if he so chooses. Michaels said Zook does not "want to be crazy." He
said Zook "can effectively think, reason, understand and cooperate with his
attorneys." Under questioning by Moreno, Michaels said he was the only physician
to ever examine Zook who did not conclude Zook was psychotic. "His delusional
progression is not consistent with mental illness," Michaels said. If Zook is psychotic,
Michaels said, the psychosis he allegedly suffers related to the implanted chip and
transmitter does not impair his ability to aid in his own defense. This week's hearing
was ordered by the state Supreme Court, which is considering an appeal filed by
Zook of a November 1999 ruling by county Judge Louis Farina. At that time, Farina
dismissed an appeal Zook had filed seeking relief under the state's Post Conviction
Relief Act. Zook asked Farina to overturn the death sentence and resentence him to
life in prison. Zook claimed he was not properly represented during his two separate
murder trials held here in the 1980s. In 1989, the state Supreme Court ruled Zook's
first trial was flawed and overturned the conviction, ordering a second trial. The U.S.
Supreme Court denied the county's appeal of the state Supreme Court's ruling. On
Jan. 12, 1990, Zook was convicted a second time of two counts of first-degree
murder and again was sentenced to death. Zook's defense team took an automatic
appeal to the state Supreme Court, but the state's top court upheld the verdict and
sentence. On March
24, 1995, Moreno filed Zook's filed first PCRA appeal in state court. The hearing on
the 1995 PCRA filing hearing was set to begin in May 1998, but was delayed until
January 1999. During the 1999 hearing before Farina, Moreno argued that Zook was
not adequately represented by attorney James P. Cullen during his first trial, nor by
attorney Vincent Quinn during his second trial. Cullen currently is a Lancaster
County Court of Common Pleas judge. Quinn, now in private practice, was the chief
counsel for the state's Judicial Conduct Board. According to the motion for a new trial Farina denied
in 1999, Zook claimed both Cullen and Quinn failed to introduce medical evidence
about his alleged mental illness during the penalty phase of the 1986 and 1990
trials that may have led the jury to impose a life sentence instead of the death
penalty. The malady,
Moreno said in 1999, was caused by brain damage Zook allegedly suffered during a
prison scuffle prior to the murders, the abuse he suffered at the hands of his parents
and Zook's history of heavy methamphetamine, marijuana, alcohol and crack
cocaine use. After the testimony concluded
Tuesday afternoon, Farina did not rule on the matter. The Supreme Court requires a
written opinion. Zook also
is serving a separate 25-to-50-year sentence for beating an elderly man during a
robbery at a Manheim Township bowling alley. GRAPHIC: PHOTO, Robert Zook; 1985 photo COMPLAINT TO U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL re: Fulton Bank
and Lancaster County Sheriff, et. al., *Complaint was recieved by U.S. Certified Mail on
December 9, 2008. Average Fees and Costs to Homeowners During A Foreclosure by U.S.
Congress ** "A
report by the Joint Economic Committee of Congress estimates that the average
cost of a foreclosure, to the homeowner, lender, local government, and neighbors
(whose homes decline in value), is $78,000. By contrast, preventing the foreclosure
would cost $3,300 per home on average. Here's how the report breaks out that
figure among various "stakeholders": ** Average Cost for Foreclosure to Homeowner: $7,200 "
Verdana;">Stanley J.
Caterbone and Advanced Media Group, was assessed and charged over $48,000.00
constituting fraud; theft by deception; embezzlement; extortion; and other federal
crimes. Realty Transfer
Fees &
nbsp; $ 3,698.00 Interest
Expense &nbs
p; $ 9,363.13
style="font-family: Verdana;">Lancaster County Sheriff Costs $ 5,012.57
style="font-family: Verdana;">Barley Snyder Legal
Costs $27,610.44
style="font-family: Verdana;">Barley Snyder Attorney
Fee $ 3,000.00 ---------------------------------------------- TOTAL &n
bsp; &n
bsp;
$48,693.14 </div><hr
size="2">November 12, 2008
Verdana;">United States
Department of Justice Attorney General Office
style="font-family: Verdana;">Eastern District Pennsylvania Suite 1250 615 Market Street
style="font-family: Verdana;">Philadelphia, PA 19106-4476 Re: Citizen Report Form from STANLEY
J. CATERBONE and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, Pro Se
Verdana;">Defendants:
Verdana;"> FULTON BANK et.
al., Fulton Bank of Lancaster Pennsylvania
style="font-family: Verdana;"> Craig Roda, President Fulton Bank
style="font-family: Verdana;"> R. Scott Smith, Jr., Chief Financial Officer, Fulton
Financial Shawn M. Long, Esq., Barley Snyder, LLC
style="font-family: Verdana;"> Law Firm of Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster County Sheriff Department of Lancaster, Pennsylvania
style="font-family: Verdana;"> Lancaster County Sheriff Terry Bergman
style="font-family: Verdana;"> Lancaster County District Attorney Craig Stedman
style="font-family: Verdana;"> Lancaster County Bail Supervision Office
style="font-family: Verdana;"> Magisterial District Judge Leo Eckert, Jr.
style="font-family: Verdana;"> Magisterial District Judge Dennis Commins, Esq.,
style="font-family: Verdana;"> Fulton Financial Corporation of Lancaster County
style="font-family: Verdana;"> Chief of Police John Fiorill of the Southern Regional
Police Department Adam Cramer of the Southern
Regional Police Department, Conestoga, PA D. Patrick
Zimmerman, Solicitor of the Lancaster County Sheriff James D. McCullough, Deputy Prothonotary, Pennsylvania Superior
Court Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge
James P. Cullen Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas Judge Michael Georgelis Central Penn
Property Services, Inc., Parula
Properties Noble Real Estate
Verdana;">FEDERAL
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION: criminal fraud, theft by deception, diversion of funds and
embezzlement; RICO; mail fraud; civil conspiracy to commit fraud; mortgage fraud;
obstruction of due process re Superior Court Appeal of Fulton Bank Judgment; abuse
of process; unjust enrichment; discrimination; anti-trust violations.
Verdana;">PROPABLE CAUSE:
Verdana;">1.Stanley J.
Caterbone appeared pro se for all of these proceedings. 2.A formal letter and complaint was
filed in the Lancaster County District Attorney Office to Mr. Craig Stedman on June
18, 2008; the complaint acknowledged but was never responded to by Mr. Craig
Stedman or anyone in the Office of the Lancaster County District
Attorney. 3.A formal
complaint was filed with the Lancaster County Commissioners to President
Commissioner Mr. Dennis Stuckey on September 18, 2008; again Mr. Dennis Stuckey
acknowledged the complaint and promised a report and or an explanation, but
never fufilled his promise. 4.Fulton Bank is a fiduciary for the Lancaster County Sheriffs
Department and the Lancaster County Clerk of Courts and holds checking accounts
for both Lancaster County Departments. 5.The JUDGMENT of June 29, 2006; the SHERIFF SALE of
December 20, 2006 and the DEED of February 1, 2007 all have been executed
without proper jurisdiction and/or improper authority for Case No. Lancaster County
Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone).
Verdana;">6.There are
missing funds that were not accounted for and should have been paid out from the
Sheriff Sale of 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA; Case No. Lancaster County Court
of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone).
Verdana;">7.Fulton Bank was
the original Mortgage of $103,000 taken out in 1995. 8.The Lancaster County Sheriffs
Solicitor D. Patrick Zimmerman held the sale proceeds in escrow until disbursement;
Case No. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v.
Stanley J. Caterbone). 9.The outstanding balance of the Fulton Bank Mortgage of 220 Stone Hill
Road was $88,568.00 at the time of foreclosure in March of 2006; Case No.
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J.
Caterbone). 10.The
Judgment of $97,425.00 of July 31, 2006 included $3,000 for legal fees; Case No.
family: Verdana;">11.There
were no liens on the deed or real estate. 12.On June 29, 2006 Lancaster County
Court of Common Pleas Judge Michael Georgelis abused is power and did not have
proper jurisdiction to rule in the case no. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas
CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone); due to the fact that the Petition
to Set Aside the Mortgage filed by Fulton Bank in the Stanley J. Caterbone Chapter
11 Bankruptcy Case No. 05-23059 was under appeal in the U.S. District Court for
the Eastern District of Pennsylvania under Judge Anita Brody; Case No. 1538-2006.
Verdana;">12.The appeal was
not ruled upon until July 17, 2006. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge
Michael Georgelis new this from the Answer to Complaint filed on May 6, 2006 by
Stanley J. Caterbone. Instead Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge
Michael Georgelis committed collusion, obstruction of due process and obstruction
of justice in the following ruling: The motion is deemed unopposed for the
Defendants failure to file a responsive brief, L.C.R.C.P. No. 1034(a)D. Stanley J.
Caterbone refused to file a response due to these facts and was awaiting a ruling in
the appeal for the Petition to Set Aside the Mortgage, case no. 1538-2006 in the
U.S. District for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. 13.On July 31, 2006 Attorney Shawn
M. Long, Esq., of Barley Snyder, LLC committed perjury and a count of unsworn
falsification to authorities filed an AFFADAVIT PURSUANT TO RULE 3129.1 with the
Lancaster County Prothonotary; Case No. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas
CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone). Item No. 7. states Name and
address of every other person of whom the plaintiff has knowledge who as any
interest in the property which may be affected by the sale: Lancaster County Tax
Claim Bureau; Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Revenue; Internal
Revenue Service. The above named entities had no interest in the property, nor was
Stanley J. Caterbone delinquent with any income or sales taxes at or near the time
of the affidavit; nor did he have any communications with such entities prior to the
statement. The following statement was signed by Shawn M. Long, Esq., I verify
that the statements made in this affidavit are true and correct to the best of my
personal knowledge or information and belief. I understand that false statements
herein are made subject to penalties of 17 Pa. C.S. Section 4904 relating to unsworn
falsification to authorities. 14.Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Michael Georgelis
filed an OPINION on September 5, 2006; Case No. Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone), stating that The
Defendant appealed my June 29, 2006 Order granting the Plaintiffs Motion for
Judgment on the pleadings, and he was directed to file a Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b)
statement by August 25, 2006. He as not done so, and accordingly, I believe he has
waived any appeal issues. The fact of the matter is that Stanley J. Caterbone had
never received the ORDER from the Lancaster County Prothonotary. This has
happened on several occasions and is well documented of Stanley J. Caterbones
mail being diverted; withheld; or not serviced at all. All other court orders and filing
requirements were met up until this time, which is highly suspect.
Verdana;">15.On or about
December 12, 2006 Southern Regional Police Chief John Fiorill confronted Stanley J.
Caterbone during a summary appeal in the Lancaster County Courthouse and tried
to persuade Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Michael Perezous to
ORDER Stanley J. Caterbone to change his address from 220 Stone Hill Road,
Conestoga, Pennsylvania to the Lancaster County Prison because the U.S.P.S Post
Office in Conestoga was tired of holding his mial while illegally imprisoned at the
Lancaster County Prison. This was only one week prior to the Sheriff Sale of
December 20, 2006 and was maliciously attempted so that the defendants could
say Stanley J. Caterbone abandoned his property. Stanley J. Caterbone refused to
change his address, and Judge Perezous would not here any further discussion of
the matter. <br style="font-
Sheriff illegally sold the property to Central Penn Property Services of Akron, PA for
$156,000 on December 20, 2006 without a certified judgment from the courts due
to Pennsylvania Superior Court Appeal of the Judgment Case No. 1463 MDA 2006;
Case No. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v.
Stanley J. Caterbone) and due to the fact that the original JUDGMENT Ordered by
Lancaster County Common Pleas Judge Michael Georgelis was not valid because he
did not have proper jurisdiction; see Item No. 11 of this document.
Verdana;">17.On January 8,
2006 Stanley J. Caterbone filed an insurance claim for theft of the real estate and
theft of the contents of 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, Pennsylvania with
Harleysville Insurance Company, Claim No. MO-702274-ZS. 18.On January 30, 2006 Shawn
Long, Esq., of Barley Snyder LLC, as counsel for Fulton Bank filed a NOTICE OF
APPEARANCE BEFORE BUSINESS JUDGE (Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas
Case No. CI-07-00019 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone and CI-06-02271 (Stanley
J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et. al.,) for a hearing scheduled
on February 1, 2007 before Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge James
Cullen at 10:00. The NOTICE contained FULTON BANKS RESPONSE TO STANLEY J.
CATERBONES PETITION TO SET ASIDE REAL ESTATE. The NOTICE was served via
U.S.P.S. regular mail to Stanley J. Caterbone and received on January 31, 2007 at
approximately 3:30pm. 19.Item No. 21 of the FULTON BANKS RESPONSE TO STANLEY J.
CATERBONES PETITION TO SET ASIDE REAL ESTATE (Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone and CI-06-
02271 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et. al.,); contains
a perjured statement and fraud which states: Such protections included, among
other things, his opportunity to answer Fulton Banks Complaint and to respond to
the Banks Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and his unsuccessful appeal to the
Pennsylvania Superior Court with respect to the Judgment entered in the
Foreclosure Case. The fact of the matter is that the last docket entry up until December 20,
2006 and including January 30, 2007 is the MEMORANDUM dated October 30, 2006
which sites Pa. R.A.P. 124 & 2171 Method of Reproduction and states OTHER
We need 7 copies of this brief, also all copies need to be bound on the left like a
book and if you use staples they must be covered with tape. Copied to Mr. Shawn
Long, Esq., Stanley J. Caterbone never received the MEMORANDUM which was held
in the Conestoga Post Office until January 4, 2007. 20. Item No. 19 and 20 of the FULTON BANKS
RESPONSE TO STANLEY J. CATERBONES PETITION TO SET ASIDE REAL ESTATE
(Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Fulton Bank v.
Stanley J. Caterbone and CI-06-02271 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group
v. Fulton Bank, et. al.,); also contains perjured statements and fraud which states:
While proper cause is not defined for purposes of Pa. R.C.P. 3132, the terms of
the rule, however, contemplate a broad discretion in the court and the courts
determination on whether to set aside the execution sale will be governed by the
particular facts of the case at hand. Goodrich Amram 2d 3125:5. As a general rule,
the power to set aside will be exercised whenever necessary to avoid injustice to an
aggrieved party, such as where failure to comply with the provisions of the
execution Rules results in prejudice to any party in interest. And then Item 20
states: The realty of this matter is that Caterbone has fully enjoyed all of the due
process protections provided by the United States Constitution and Pennsylvania
law throughout the Foreclosure Case, as is shown by the record. See this
documents No.s 9;10;14;16;17;18;19;20;21;22;23;24;25;26;27;28;29;30;31;32.
Verdana;">21.Furthermore all
of the court cases that have claimed causes of actions dealing with any of these
issues have been adjudicated with abuse of discretion, abuse of power; abuse of
process; fraud; perjury; prosecutorial misconduct; judicial misconduct; and federal
criminal statutes under RICO (Racketeering In Corruption Act). 22.On January 4, 2007 Stanley J.
Caterbone visited the U.S.P.S. Conestoga Post Office and retrieved all the mails
including the MEMORANDUM from the Pennsylvania Superior Court Case No. 1463
MDA 2006 (Appeal of the June 29th 2006 JUDGMENT Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group
v. Fulton Bank, et al., and CI-06-02271 Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone).; and
submitted the requested copies on January 9, 2007. 23.On January 4, 2007 Mr. James D.
McCullough, Deputy Prothonotary committed collusion and conspiracy to commit
fraud by filing a certified ORDER of Pennsylvania Superior Court Case No. 1463 MDA
2006 Per Curiam stating AND NOW, the fourth day of January, 2007 this matter is
dismissed for failure to file a brief; in Pennsylvania Superior Court Case No. 1463
MDA 2006 (Appeal of the June 29th 2006 JUDGMENT Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group
v. Fulton Bank, et al., and CI-06-02271 Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone).
Verdana;">24.On January 4,
2007 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge James P. Cullen committed
collusion and conspiracy to commit fraud when Stanley J. Caterbone entered an oral
motion for continuance of the criminal court proceedings for criminal case no. 3179-
2006 in the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas; in order to deal with the theft
of his legal and business property, and the contents of 220 Stone Hill Road,
Conestoga, which were at the very moment being stolen and loaded into 2 Penske
trucks. Judge James P. Cullen denied the motion and would not lend any credibility
to the account for the record of the preceding. 25.Stanley J. Caterbone received a forwarded
postmark of January 11, 2007 containing the January 4, 2007 ORDER to dismiss
Pennsylvania Superior Court case no. 1463 MDA the Appeal of the Fulton Bank
Judgment for the Foreclosure; (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone and CI-06-
02271). 26.The preceding
proves that at the time of
t
e Sheriff Sale on December 20, 2006 the Judgment was not certified due to the
Appeal of the Judgment in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, and furthermore was
still under Appeal, thus making the Sheriff Sale of December 20, 2006 illegal;
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v.
Verdana;">27.Lancaster County Court Common Pleas Judge Michael Georgelis
committed collusion; conspiracy to commit fraud; obstruction of due process; and
abuse of power by signing the ORDER dated February 1, 2007 which DENIED the
Petition to Set Aside the Sale WITH PREJUDICE without granting Stanley J. Caterbone
the opportunity to state his case and submit a formal written REPLY to the Fulton
Bank RESPONSE recorded on January 31, 2007; Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton
Bank, et al., 28.Magisterial District Justice Leo Eckert, Jr., Officer Cramer of the
Southern Regional Police Department, the Lancaster County Bail Supervision Office,
and Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Paul K. Allison all colluded and
committed conspiracy to commit fraud with the illegal detention of Stanley J.
Caterbone from October 30, 2006 until after the Sheriff Sale of December 20, 2006
until the release due to his successful Appeal on December 29, 2006. Stanley J.
Caterbone should have been released on November 1, 2006 under unsecured bail,
as stated and recorded in court filings. 29.On February 1, 2007 D. Patrick Zimmerman committed
collusion and conspiracy to commit fraud by distributing the proceeds of the Sheriff
Sale to Fulton Bank. D. Patrick Zimmerman also committed fraud with respect to the
escrow account. 30.Stanley J. Caterbone received a check for $17,306.80 on February 2,
2007 from the proceeds of the December 20, 2006 Sheriff Sale; Lancaster County
Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced
Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et al., and CI-06-02271 Fulton Bank v. Stanley J.
1099 from Fulton Bank to the IRS listed the fair market value at $250,000 and the
property transferred for $195,000 on March 13, 2007. 32. The deed recorded in the
Lancaster County Deeds Office listed Parula Properties as the owner, when Central
Penn Property Services was the rightful winning bidder on December 20, 2006;
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Stanley J.
Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et al., and CI-06-02271 Fulton
Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone). 33.The Lancaster County Sheriff took some $5,021.57 in fees for
the execution of the Sheriff Sale, yet the Prothonotary states the actual fees were
only $2,676.25; Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019
(Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et al., and CI-06-02271
Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone). 34.Fulton Bank was paid approximately $98,000 in monthly
mortgages payments during the time period of 1995 thru default in July of 2005 and
received approximately $122,000.00 from the proceeds of the Sheriff Sale resulting
in approximately $220,000 over 10 years on a $103,000 mortgage; Lancaster
County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Stanley J.
Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et al., and CI-06-02271 Fulton
family: Verdana;">35.During the Sheriff Sale of December 20, 2006 the Fulton Bank
Foreclosure was under appeal in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania as Case No.
1463 MDA 2006; Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019
(Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et al., and CI-06-02271
Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone). 36.There was never any eviction notice served upon Stanley J.
Caterbone, whom had every conceivable legal right to keep possession of the
property through the period of February 1, 2007 and as the Fulton Bank Mortgage
Agreement outlines, an Eviction Notice would have had to have been properly
served to remove Stanley J. Caterbone after February 1, 2007; Lancaster County
Court of Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced
Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et al., and CI-06-02271 Fulton Bank v. Stanley J.
family: Verdana;">37.All legal
files of all Lancaster County Commonwealth Court; the Superior Court of
Pennsylvania; the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for Eastern Pennsylvania; the U.S. Third Circuit Court of
Appeals; local District Magistrates; all business files for the Advanced Media Group;
and all personal files were also stolen from December 4, 2008 until April 13, 2007.
Verdana;">38.Parula
Properties committed criminal trespass and burglary by illegally entering the
property prior to the settlement of February 1, 2007 and removing all of the
contents, including a 1991 Dodge Pick-up truck and trailer; Lancaster County Court
of Common Pleas Case No. CI-07-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media
Group v. Fulton Bank, et al., and CI-06-02271 Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone
and Criminal Division Case No. MD 879-2007 Petition for Review).
Verdana;">39.All possessions
were stolen and not recovered until April 13, 2007 when Harleysville Insurance
demanded the return of the items and contents of 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga,
PA 17516; Claim No. MO-702274-ZS of Harleysville Insurance Company of
Moorestown, New Jersey. 40.Harleysville Insurance Company of Moorestown, New Jersey was
settled under Claim No. MO-702274-ZS for stolen property that was not retrieved or
returned and did so using undo influence and extortion for not including all items
that were stolen or vandalized. 41.Parula Properties and or Harleysville Insurance could not
account for 4 or 5 boxes of daily Time Management Calendars and large Desktop
Calendars; as well as other business and legal files; and personal and business
possessions. 42.Related
Court Cases with Fulton Bank and Lancaster County Sheriffs
Department: Lancaster
County Court of Common Pleas o Case No. CI-06-
00019 o Case No. CI-06-00150 o Case No. CI-06-00366 o Case No. CI-06-
02271 o Criminal Division Case No. MD 879-2007 Petition for
Review Superior Court of
Pennsylvania o Case No. 1463 MDA 2006
style="font-family: Verdana;">o Case No. 951 MDA 2007 o Case No. 950 MDA 2007 Supreme Court of Pennsylvania o Case No.
248 MDA 2007 o Case No. 432 MT 2007
style="font-family: Verdana;">o Case No. 433 MT 2007 U.S. Bankruptcy Court
style="font-family: Verdana;">o Case No. 05-23059 U.S. District Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania o Case No. 05-
style="font-family: Verdana;">o Case No. 06-4650 o Case No.
CA-06-1538 U.S. Third
Circuit Court of Appeals o Case No. 07-
style="font-family: Verdana;">o Case No. 07-4475 Respectfully,
Verdana;">Stan J. Caterbone
style="font-family: Verdana;">Advanced Media Group </div><hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;
margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px;"><div style="text-align: justify;"> </div>AUDIT OF 220 STONE HILL ROAD
SHERIFF SALE PROCEEDS AND CLOSING COST TRANSACTIONS
 <div style="text-align:
justify;"> July 20, 2006 JUDGMENT COURT ORDER $97,425.07
Verdana;">Plus continuing
interest after March 2, 2006 @ $14.56 per diem; as stated Plus continuing late charges and costs pursuant to June 29, 2006
ORDER; as stated July 31, 2006 PRAECIPE WRIT OF EXECUTION Principal $88, 568.53; as stated
style="font-family: Verdana;">Interest to 03/02/2006 @ $14.53 = $4,442.96; as
stated Negative Escrow Balance = $1,096.38; as stated
style="font-family: Verdana;">Late Charges = $317.20; as stated
style="font-family: Verdana;">Attorney Fee = $3,000.00; as stated
Verdana;">January 2, 2007
WRIT RETURNED To Prothonotary, Sheriff fees in the amount of $3,340.62 paid and a
refund check in the amount of 2,676.25, ck 66219 dated February 1, 2007 was
mailed to Barley Snyder same date.; as stated January 19, 2007 SHERIFF SCHEDULE OF
DISTRIBUTION WRIT OF EXECUTION EX CI-06-02271 o Proceeds of Sale = $156,000.00;
as stated o Deduct Cost = $ 5,021.57; as
stated o Balance = $150,000.00; as
style="font-family: Verdana;">o Delinquent Taxes = None; as stated
style="font-family: Verdana;">o 2006 County Municipal & School Taxes = Paid;
as stated o Water/Sewer on site, not public N/A; as stated
style="font-family: Verdana;">o Realty Transfer Taxes Recorder of Deeds
$3,699.00 o Mtg. Payoff to Barley Snyder of
Fulton $129,972.59; as stated o Balance of
Proceeds Stanley J. Caterbone $17,306.80; as stated February 1, 2007 SHERIFFS DEED
LANCASTER COUNTY RECORDER OF DEEDS o State Transfer
Real Estate Tax = $1,849.00; as stated o Local Transfer
Real Estate Tax = $1,849.00; as stated February 5, 2007
LETTER FROM ROBERT W. ST. CLAIR, LOAN WORKOUT OFFICER FOR FULTON BANK
style="font-family: Verdana;">o Principal = $88,568.53; as
style="font-family: Verdana;">o Interest = $9,363.13; as stated
style="font-family: Verdana;">o Negative Escrow = $3,827.81; as
style="font-family: Verdana;">o Late Fees = $ 602.68; as
style="font-family: Verdana;">o Legal Fees and Costs = $27,610.44; as stated
Verdana;">March 13, 2007
LANCASTER COUNTY RECORDER OF DEEDS 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA transfers from Parula
Properties to Stoltzfus for $195,000.00 March 13, 2007 FULTON BANK IRS FORM 1099 TO STANLEY J.
CATERBONE o Fair Market Value of Real Estate -
$250,000; as stated Financial Elements under investigation: 1. Realty Transfer Taxes - $ 3,698.00
style="font-family: Verdana;">2. Interest Expense - $ 9,363.13 3. Sheriff Costs - $ 5,021.57 4. Legal Fees - $
27,610.44 5. Attorney Fees - $ 3,000.00
style="font-family: Verdana;">6. Negative Escrow Balance - $ 3,827.81
style="font-family: Verdana;">7. Judgment - $ 97,425.07 8. Distribution Proceeds $ 17,306.80 </div><hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px; margin-left:
0px; margin-right: 0px;"><div style="text-align: justify;"> EXHIBITS
FOR COMPLAINT re Fulton Bank et. al., 1. 04/11/2006 PRAECIPE to reinstate the Complaint originally
filed on March 8, 2006 filed by Shawn M. Long, Esq., of Barley Snyder LLC re
Caterbone Mortgage Foreclose). 2. 05/06/2006 ANSWER TO COMPLAINT filed by Stanley J.
Caterbone, appearing pro se for Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-
02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone Mortgage Foreclose).
Verdana;">3. 06/06/2006
PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS filed by Shawn M. Long,
Esq., of Barley Snyder LLC re Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271
(Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone Mortgage Foreclose). 4. 06/29/2006 - ORDER by
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Michael A. Georgelis ORDERED AND
DECREED Motion is granted for JUDGMENT re Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone Mortgage Foreclose) for not
responding to complaint, which was a false statement. 5. 06/31/2006 NOTICE OF SHERIFF
SALE re Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v.
Stanley J. Caterbone Mortgage Foreclose). 6. 07/20/2006 NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT, ORDER OR
DECREE by Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Michael A. Georgelis
ORDERED AND DECREED Motion is granted for JUDGMENT re Lancaster County
Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone Mortgage
Foreclose) for $97,425.07. 7. 07/31/2006 PRAECIPE FOR WRIT OF EXECUTION filed by Shawn M.
Long, Esq., of Barley Snyder LLC re Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-
02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone Mortgage Foreclose).
NOTICE PURSUANT TO RULE 3129 filed by Shawn M. Long, Esq., of Barley Snyder
LLC re Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v.
family: Verdana;">9. 07/31/2006 AFFADAVIT PURSUANT TO RULE 3129.1 filed by
Shawn M. Long, Esq., of Barley Snyder LLC re Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone Mortgage Foreclose).
ORDER by Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Michael A. Georgelis for
a hearing on the In Forma Pauperis Petition of Stanley J. Caterbone re Lancaster
County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone
Mortgage Foreclose). This hearing was protested by Stanley J. Caterbone for not
being within the Pa.R.C.P. 11. 08/11/2006 In Form Pauperis APPROVED by Lancaster County Court
of Common Pleas Judge Michael A. Georgelis. 12. 08/11/2006 - Pa.R.A.P. 1925(a) ORDER by
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Michael A. Georgelis re directed to
file concise statement of matters for Superior Court of Pennsylvania case no. 1463
MDA 2006 Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone lower trial court Lancaster County
Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone Mortgage
Foreclose). 13.
09/05/2006 Pa.R.A.P. 1925(a) OPINION by Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas Judge Michael A. Georgelis. 14. 09/06/2006 Letter from the Lancaster County Office of the
Prothonotary, Court of Common Pleas, Civil re submission of lower trial court record
re Superior Court of Pennsylvania case no. 1463 MDA 2006 Fulton Bank v. Stanley J.
Caterbone lower trial court Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271
(Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone Mortgage Foreclose). 15. 10/26/2006 BRIEF IN SUPPORT
OF APPEAL TO SUPERIOR COURT filed by Stanley J. Caterbone re Superior Court of
Pennsylvania case no. 1463 MDA 2006 Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone lower
trial court Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v.
family: Verdana;">16. 10/30/2006 MEMORANDUM to Stanley J. Caterbone
requesting additional copies of brief stamped and recorded on October 26, 2006 for
Superior Court of Pennsylvania case no. 1463 MDA 2006 Fulton Bank v. Stanley J.
Caterbone lower trial court Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271
(Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone Mortgage Foreclose). Attached envelope with
U.S.P.S. postmark of October 30, 2006. 17. 01/04/2007 Superior Court of Pennsylvania ORDER
Dismissal of Superior Court of Pennsylvania case no. 1463 MDA 2006 Fulton Bank v.
Stanley J. Caterbone lower trial court Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-
06-02271 (Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone Mortgage Foreclose) and 01/13/2007
U.S.P.S. forwarding postmark of January 11, 2007 to Stanley J. Caterbone of 1250
Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA 17603. 18. 01/09/2007 Letter to James D. McCullough, Deputy
Prothonotary, Superior Court of Pennsylvania; exhibits; and (7) seven copies of brief
re case no. 1463 MDA 2006 Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone lower trial court
Caterbone Mortgage Foreclose). 19. 01/11/2008 - Letter from Lancaster County Sheriff Solicitor D.
Patrick Zimmerman to Stanley J. Caterbone re schedule and intention to make
distribution from sale and delivery of Sheriffs Deed and request for signed and
dated copy of Petition to Set Aside Sale Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas
CI-06-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et. al.,).
(Already properly served). 20. 01/18/2007 Hearing with MDJ Stoltzfus re 4 charges and 3 guilty
verdicts. Required $965.00 cash or to jail. All convictions overturned during
summary appeals in April by Stanley J. Caterbone appearing pro se. Joseph
Caterbone loans Stanley J. Caterbone entire amount of fines and costs to avoid
prison. 21. 01/18/2007 -
Letter from Lancaster County Sheriff Solicitor D. Patrick Zimmerman to Stanley J.
Caterbone re schedule and intention to make distribution from sale and delivery of
Sheriffs Deed. 23. 01/25/2007 Letter from Lancaster County Sheriff Solicitor D. Patrick
Zimmerman to Shawn M. Long, Esq., of Barley Snyder LLC and Central Penn
Property Services, Inc., of Akron, Pennsylvania re halting of distribution of funds and
Sheriffs Deed due to Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-00019
(Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et. al.,).
Lancaster County Sheriff Schedule of Distribution and Fulton Bank check no. 66215
re proceeds from Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton
family: Verdana;">25. 02/01/2007 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas
ORDER by Judge Michael Georgelis Denying Petition to Set Aside Sale (Lancaster
County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media
Group v. Fulton Bank, et. al.,). 26. 02/01/2007 Sheriff Deed re: 220 Stone Hill Road,
Conestoga, PA 17516 to Stanley J. Caterbone. 27. 02/05/2007 Letter from Robert St. Clair, Loan
Workout Officer of Fulton Bank, re breakdown of distribution of proceeds from sheriff
sale of 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA. 28. 02/05/2007 Reply to Fulton Bank Response to Petition to Set
Aside Sale (Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-00019 (Stanley J.
Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et. al.,) 29. 02/05/2007 - U.S.P.S. Certificate
of Mailing for Reply to Fulton Bank Response to Petition to Set Aside Sale (Lancaster
County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media
Group v. Fulton Bank, et. al.,). 30. 02/08/2007 Fulton Bank IRS Form 1099 re 220 Stone Hill
Road, Conestoga, PA 17516 to Stanley J. Caterbone. 31. 05/19/1990 Lancaster New Era
newspaper article containing Fulton Bank relationship with James Guerin and ISC:
To give up in lieu of fines the $2 million deposited by Gurein and Parent (Parent
Bank/Industries) in a Fulton Bank escrow account to settle a severance pay dispute
with former ISC attorney William A. Clark. 32. 09/07/2006 CERTIFIED LETTER from Shawn M. Long, Esq., of
Barley Snyder LLC to Stanley J. Caterbone re Trespass Notice under Section 3503 of
the Pennsylvania Crimes Code barring litigant Stanley J. Caterbone from the
premises of Barley Snyder LLC at 126 East King Streets, Lancaster, Pennsylvania in
order to harass; intimidate; and obstruct due process and justice. No reason was
provided. <br style="font-
09/15/2006 - CERTIFIED LETTER from Ronald H. Pollack, Jr., Esq., of Barley Snyder
LLC to Stanley J. Caterbone re Trespass Notice under Section 3503 of the
Pennsylvania Crimes Code barring litigant Stanley J. Caterbone from the premises of
Lancaster Newspapers, Inc., , Lancaster, Pennsylvania in order to harass; intimidate;
and obstruct due process and justice. All incidents were fabricated, of course.
Letter from Michael L. Landis, Chief County Detective, Office of the District Attorney
of Lancaster County, re Private Criminal Complaints filed against Parula Properties,
Noble Real Estate, and Central Penn Properties for the stolen contents of 220 Stone
Hill Road, Conestoga, Pennsylvania. Attached is the Private Criminal Complaint of
September 18, 2007, which was formerly filed and assigned case no. MD 879-2007
Petition for Review in the Criminal Division of the Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas. <br style="font-
01/08/2008 - Letter from Stephanie Carfley, Esq., of Barley Snyder LLC re December
13, 2007 and December 21, 2007 letters to R. Scott Smith, Jr., Chairman, President
and Chief Executive Officer of Fulton Financial Corporation; and Ethics Point Report
complaints re Fulton Bank. 36. 11/08/2008 - Docket Sheet Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas
CI-06-00019 (Stanley J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group v. Fulton Bank, et. al.,
Verdana;">37. 11/08/2008 -
Docket Sheet Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas CI-06-02271 (Fulton Bank v.
Verdana;">38. 01/11/2008 Letter from Stephanie Carfley, Esq., of Barley Snyder
LLC re former employment with Roda & Nast, P.C. and Joseph Roda, Esq., to
Stanley J. Caterbone concerning International Signal & Control, PLC (ISC) and
the representation of ISC attorney William Clark and the re the severance pay
dispute with ISC and James Guerin. 39. 11/14/2007 Letter from R. Scott Smith, Jr., Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Fulton Financial Corporation re meeting and
litigation. 40. 07/02/2008 - U.S. Department of Justice Citizen Report Form.
style="font-family: Verdana;">PRESS RELEASE
OF OCTOBER 4, 2008 CATERBONE and ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP WIN IN THE U.S. THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS IN OPINION
(Third Circuit Judges Sloviter, Barry and Nygaard) OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008:
Verdana;">Defendants:
Fulton Bank (Barley Snyder, LLC); Southern Regional Police Department; Lancaster
County Prison (Apel & Yost); Lancaster County Sheriff Department;
Commonwealth (Mellon) (Cozen O'Conner) Bank; Manhiem Township Police
Department (Hartman, Underhill & Brubaker); Avalon Police Department (Segal
McCambridge Singer & Mahoney Ltd.,); Stone Harbor Police Department;
Etc., In The U.S. Third
Circuit Court of Appeals in CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison/Fulton Bank , et.
al., (U.S. District Court Case No. 05-2288 and Third Circuit Case No. 07-4474) and
also in CATERBONE/ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP v. Mr. Randall O. Wenger, et. al., (U.S.
District Court Case No. 06-4650 and Third Circuit Case No. 04-4475);
Verdana;">The U.S. Third
Circuit Court of Appeals VACATED the lower courts DISMISSAL of both cases for not
filing an Amended Complaint on Time ; and both cases are now remanded back to
the U.S. District Court for further proceedings under Judge Mary A. McLaughlin.
Verdana;">April 22, 2008 -
U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Judges AMBROS, FUENTES, and JORDAN
Verdana;">QUESTIONS
style="font-family: Verdana;">(1) By the Clerk for possible dismissal due to a
jurisdictional defect; (2) By the Clerk for possible dismissal under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)* or
for possible summary action under I.O.P. 10.6; *Note that the magistrate applied 28
U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) to dismiss the plainly frivolous case sua sponte without
requiring the victimized defendants to expend legal fees in responding.
Verdana;">(3) Appellants
jurisdictional response; (4) Jurisdictional response of Appellee, Fulton Bank; (5)
Motion by Appellee, Manheim Township Police Department, to dismiss appeal; and
(6) Appellants motion for appointment of counsel in the above-captioned case.
Verdana;">The question of
jurisdiction, and the motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, are referred to the
merits panel. See I.O.P. 10.3.5. We do not dismiss the appeal under 28 U.S.C.
1915(e) or take summary action under I.O.P. 10.6. The Clerk is directed to issue a
briefing schedule. We note, however, that this order does not represent a finding of
appellate jurisdiction in this matter. As in all cases, the panel of this Court that
reviews the appeal on its merits will make a final determination of appellate
jurisdiction. In addition to any other issues the parties wish to raise in their briefs,
the parties shall address whether the District Court erred in dismissing the case
without addressing the factors set forth in Poulis v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.,
747 F.2d 863 (3d Cir. 1984). The motion for appointment of counsel is denied. September 30, 2008 - U.S. Third Circuit Court Judges SLOVITAR, BARRY,
and NYGAARD QUESTIONS ORDER of October 22, 2007 by U.S. District Judge Mary A.
McLaughlin to DISSMISS both cases WITH PREJUDICE for not filing completed
amended complaint. ORDERED and ADJUDGED by this Court that the judgments of the
District Court entered on October 23, 2007, be and the same are hereby VACATED
and the cases are REMANDED for further proceedings. Costs will not be taxed. All of
the above in accordance with the opinion of this Court. MAJOR NEWS - KARL ROVE HAS HIS
FINGERRINTS AND MARKING ALL OVER MY SITUATION! October 2, 2008 I urge you to go out and rent or buy this DVD , unless you already did.
style="font-family: Verdana;">This is the MO that I needed. He was here in
Lancaster two (2) years ago campaigning for Rick Santorum ( I have to check the
dates), who lost to Robert Casey, Jr. for The U.S. Senate Seat. o He made sure he drove by me so that I would see him!
style="font-family: Verdana;">o He started bugging offices in the 1970's.
style="font-family: Verdana;">o He started counterfeiting documents in the
1970's. o He started breaking into opposition offices in the
1970's. o He was first noticed by George H. W. Bush in the
1970's. o He used the "networking" MO in his college days.
style="font-family: Verdana;">o I personally saw him in Lancaster over the past few
years. o He has been teaching his "techniques" for years to
others. o He had a personal relationship with the FBI and
used it to have persons prosecuted and jailed and thinks nothing of ruining
someone's life for the Republican Party! o On Tuesday,
September 30, 2008 there was a Special Prosecutor named in the Alerbero Gonzales
(Former U.S. Attorney General) case regarding the firings of the attorney generals.
style="font-family: Verdana;">o The U.S. Department of Justice thinks Karl Rove and
Alberto Gonzales should face criminal charges. (click here) I will update this new information at
a later time. </div><hr
size="2">About the Book Step inside Bush's
Brain with this enlightening book by James C. Moore
and Wayne Slater Many Washington insiders believe that the strength of the Bush machine
lies not in its leader but in Karl Rove, the man who picked Bush to run for Governor
of Texas, tutored him on the workings of government, and ran brilliant yet brutal
campaigns that would eventually sweep Bush into the Presidency.
Verdana;">In Bush's Brain:
How Karl Rove Made George W. Bush Presidential, readers will enter the powerful
world of White House Senior Advisor Karl Rove and learn how this man created
George W. Bush and continues to keep him on top. Political journalists James Moore
and Wayne Slater offer a rare glimpse into the man who has become the single
most important advisor to George W. Bush and the person who many think is calling
the shots at the White House. They also discuss how Rove's strategic decisions
seem to be determining U.S. policy for the Bush administration, including the
controversial tactic of running on a war with Iraq. This intriguing book also features previously
unreported information on the Bush campaign from the primaries and the
conventions to the fall general election and the complex relationship Rove and Bush
currently share. Karl Rove is both feared and admired by Republicans and
Democrats alike. His take no prisoners approach to politics has received mixed
reviews and left everyone wondering who's really running this country? In Bush's
Brain: How Karl Rove Made George W. Bush Presidential readers will learn who the
real Karl Rove is and just how much power he really has. WACHOVIA AND FULTON BANK CASHIER'S CHECK
SCAM OF SEPTEMBER 12, 2008 Fulton Bank and Wachovia Bank tried to confiscate and abscond
my Fulton Bank $17,306.80 Cashier's Check made payable to myself, Stan J.
Caterbone and guaranteed, on Thursday and Friday September 11th and 12th,
2008; through a conspiracy of theft by deception and fraud. On Thursday, Fulton Bank at the
Penn Square Headquarters refused to open a checking account to accept the
$17,306.80 Cashier's Check guaranteed by Fulton Bank themselves, dated
September 22, 2007 (See the letter below). By refusing to open the checking
account, I had to go to Wachovia Bank, where I had a checking account in good
standing for the past year, to deposit the Cashier's Check. The next day, Friday, I recorded my
meeting with the Wachovia Branch Manager regarding the transaction. Wachovia
Bank was setting up a discretionary policy of both banks to not honor the
guaranteed Fulton Bank Cashier's Check. The end result would have been that they would have
confiscated the actual Fulton Bank Cashier's Check, never credited my account, and
charged me overdraft fees for any transactions that I placed on my Wachovia Check
Card from the date of deposit. I would have lost possession of the actual Fulton Bank Cashier's
check or $17,306.80; I would have been charged overdraft fees; and they would
have closed my checking account due to non-sufficient funds. Ultimately I would
have not been able to pay for my monthly hosting fee for this website (can only pay
with a credit card or debit card) and this website would have been taken off-line.
Verdana;">I would have gone
back to Wachovia Bank and Fulton Bank and argued about who stole my $17,306.80
and one or both of them would have called 911; then since they are both in the City
of Lancaster, the Lancaster City Police would have responded with a Crisis
Intervention Mental Health Officer and attempted to cite me with disorderly conduct
and get a Section 302 Commitment Order signed by the Lancaster County
Administrator. Trust me, this was already in the works. Transcript with Wachovia
Bank Branch Manager's Office Corner of Hershey
Avenue and Manor Street Lancaster, PA 17603
Verdana;">September 12,
style="font-family: Verdana;">Approximately 10:40 am Recording approximately 12
minutes in length [Stan J. Caterbone] I have a Cashie'rs Check here ($17,306.80), now if I
deposit this now how does this work with this cashiers check [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager -
Black Male] We have ah next-day availability which means by Saturday morning.
Verdana;">[Stan J.
Caterbone] Even though it is Fulton Bank, I cant have immediate availability?
Verdana;">[Wachovia Bank
Branch Manager] Depends on how much you need back? [Stan J. Caterbone] Till tomorrow? I
think like $10.00 dollars. [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] .. Let me look at your account for a
minute. <br style="font-family:
Caterbone] I am eventually going to get another Cashier's Check.
Branch Manager] We can put it on a next day ticket for availability if you want to
cash this check, but it is going to take a little bit of time. You have a few overdrafts.
Caterbone] That last overdraft was a bit confusing. [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] Are you talking
about for this check, were talking about ... youre looking at mayber 2 to 3 business
days. [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] Figuring in the overdrafts.
Caterbone] What do you mean, I dont understand. [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager]
Any check for the day of deposit takes usually 2 to 3 business days.
Caterbone] A Cashier's Check? Its a Cashier's Check! [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] It
is going to have to pass through Fulton to make sure Fulton is O.K. with it. That is
the reason why. [Stan J.
Caterbone] Its a Cashiers Check! Well Its a Cashiers Check! [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] You never had an account there?
Caterbone] Its the proceeds from a real estate sale. [Stan J. Caterbone] What is a Cashier's Check?
Branch Manager] A Cashier's Check is just a it used to mean it was like cash. no
more its like that. [Stan J. Caterbone] Well its still like cash because there is no account. I
have no account. It is not drawn on an account. [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] It is drawn on an
account. Its drawn on the house account. You got a house sale right? So it is drawn
on that account. It is drawn on that house. [Stan J. Caterbone] No, it is not. No because I traded, I swapped
Cashier's Checks. [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] So you swapped Cashier's Checks?
Caterbone] Yea. [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] It is still going to take 2 to 3 days.
Caterbone] But there is no account. I never had an account there.
Branch Manager] So what was the Cashier's Check from? [Stan J. Caterbone] Fulton Bank.
Does it matter? Does it matter? [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] Hum. [Stan J. Caterbone] Does it matter?
Branch Manager] Oh it doesnt matter cause. [Stan J. Caterbone] O.K. what is a Cashier's Check?
Branch Manager] It is still going to take 2 to 3 days. [Stan J. Caterbone] I know but Im
trying to determine Im trying to ask you what a Cashier's Check is.
Branch Manager] A Cashier's Check is Basically a check, basically a check.
Caterbone] It is a guaranteed check. [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] It is only guaranteed if you are
going to get it, so we have to hold it for 2 or 3 days. That is if Wachovia does get it.
Caterbone] What do you mean if Wachovia gets it. [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] Thats if we are
going to get it. [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] They (Fulton Bank) may not honor it.
Caterbone] They (Fulton Bank) have to honor it. Its a Cashier's Check.
Branch Manager] They (Fulton Bank) dont have to honor it. They (Fulton Bank)
dont have to honor that check. I have seen that happen before.
Caterbone] Why, how can they (Fulton Bank) steal a Cashiers Check?
Branch Manager] It is not really stealing a Cashiers Check. Lets say something was
wrong or you know they didnt want to honor the check or then it has to come back
down to us, and then we cant take it. [Stan J. Caterbone] They (Fulton Bank) cant do that on a
Cashier's Check. [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] They (Fulton Bank) can do it.
Verdana;">3:35 [Stan J.
Caterbone] How can they (Fulton Bank) do it? How can they (Fulton Bank) do that?
Branch Manager] Its up to the banks rules. Certain banks have certain policies.
Caterbone] For what? [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] If I were to make up the policies.
Caterbone] How do you buy a Cashiers Check? You have to have guaranteed funds
to buy a Cashiers Check. The funds are already guaranteed. You cant revert it back
to an un guaranteed to an unsecured document. [Stan J. Caterbone] Well sure the bank could be
closed (shut down). [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] So, thats why we have to have a 2-3
day hold. <br style="font-
Caterbone] You mean I cant buy another Cashiers Check from you?
Branch Manager] Now you could once the money is available. Once the funds are
available you could buy a Cashiers Check. Thats what you could do.
Caterbone] Where did you get this definition of a Cashiers Check?
Branch Manager] A Cashiers Check isnt always guarunteed. [Stan J. Caterbone] That wouldnt be
a Cashiers Check then. [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] Some Cashiers Checks are fraudulent
and they need to [Stan J. Caterbone] Of course, if it is a fraud (laugh). [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] It
would still be a Cashiers Check. Right, you still have to go through Fulton Bank, you
still have to file the check and wait 2-3 days. [Stan J.
Caterbone] I did not like your explanation for a Cashiers Check that they can hold
that check, and they cant. [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] Well they can. Wachovia can. They
can hold the check. [Stan J. Caterbone] How can they hold my check? [Stan J. Caterbone] No. You said Fulton could not pay it.
Branch Manager] Ya, Fulton could not pay it. Fulton could say we are not going to
pay that check. [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] They can do that.
Its a Cashiers Check. [Stan J. Caterbone] No they cant. [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] Yes they can. That
is up to them. Wachovia rules are like this. Once we deposit that check, it takes 2-3
business days. [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] Yea, Fulton does
not have to honor that check. [Stan J. Caterbone] Sure they do, its a Cashiers Check.
Branch Manager] They dont. That is something you are going to have to ask Fulton.
Caterbone] Why are you saying they dont have to honor it? [Stan J. Caterbone] On its not. A
Cashiers Check is already guaranteed. Thats how you get a Cashiers Check. You
have to have guaranteed funds. You have to confirm the guaranteed funds or else it
would not be a Cashiers Check. [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] It, still sometimes it is denied.
Caterbone] How? [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] They dont have to honor it.
Caterbone] How? [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] I dont know how Fulton does it, but
sometimes they just dont honor it. [Stan J. Caterbone] How can they not honor a Cashiers Check?
Branch Manager] They dont have to honor it. It is up to that bank not to honor it.
Caterbone] No its not. That would be breaking the law. [Stan J. Caterbone] Unless it was fraudulent. [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] We could put it in next day
ticket. We could do that for you. [Stan J. Caterbone] So how does a next-day ticket work?
Branch Manager] The next-day ticket gives you funds availability the next business
day. The next business day. [Stan J. Caterbone] So, I would have $17,000 available the next day?
Branch Manager] You got it. [Stan J. Caterbone] And how much can I use today? [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] You want to put all of it in your
account? [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] O.K. we can do that. Just take it up to
the teller. [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] Your account balance is $1.50.
Caterbone] O.K. what if I use $ .85 cents of that today? How is that going to work?
Branch Manager] You would withdraw $ .85 cents? [Stan J. Caterbone] No, if I use my bank card for $ .85
cents? [Stan J. Caterbone] What is my
balance going to be? [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] $ .65 cents. [Stan J. Caterbone] Then what
happens? [Wachovia
Bank Branch Manager] You would have $.65 cents available. [Stan J. Caterbone] Then what
happens? [Stan J. Caterbone] No, I would have $ .65 cents in
there, then you would overdraft me. [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] No. [Stan J. Caterbone] Then why did
you overdraft me last month (August) when I a had $20 cents balance? I had a $ .20
cent balance and you overdraft me. Go look at my statement. There was a charge of
$5.95 in my account, that left $ .20 cents and you overdraft me $35.00.
Branch Manager] There was $5.15 in your account. You bought something from
Marion Courtroom for $3.95. Then you also purchased something from Lancaster
Newspapers for $4.95 cents. [Stan J. Caterbone] No. No. Look the statement. Your Wrong. My
statement says otherwise. [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] This is your account (on computer
screen). $4.95. Then on the 13th (August) [Stan J. Caterbone] No thats wrong Go look at my
statement. <br style="font-
Caterbone] I got the statement. Theres a .20 cent balance left after the $5.15. That
was Friday night after the deposit left $ .20 cents. Marion Court was on the 15th
(August). I made a deposit on Friday. [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] Your wrong. This is the
statement (computer screen), you made a deposit on the 18th. [Stan J. Caterbone] No, I made a
deposit on the 15th at 4:00pm. She cashed the check. [Stan J. Caterbone] Well theres a $ .20 balance on
my statement. After the $5.15, after the Lancaster Newspaper. That left $ .20 cent
balance in my account. That Marion Court was on Friday night. That did not hit until
the 18 th (August). Im telling you that is wrong. [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] $4.95, Now that is
wrong. Sir, Im going off what this says. [Stan J. Caterbone] Well, Im telling you that is wrong.
Branch Manager] This is why you got the overdraft. [Stan J. Caterbone] How?
Branch Manager]The way Im looking at it you had $5.15. [Stan J. Caterbone] After the $5.15 I
had $ .20 cents. [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] This is the $4.95 [Stan J. Caterbone] I had $ .15 cents
($ .20) in my account. I wwent to yiour teller and I said I need these funds available
for the weekend. Here is a check for $50.00 from a District Magistrate (Refund for
Driving Under Suspension Charge by Pennsylvania State Police that was dismissed).
Why werent they available? [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] The funds werent available until the
18th. <br style="font-family:
Caterbone] She (Wachovia Bank Teller) told me they would be available for the
weekend. (I would have just cashed the check and used the cash for the weekend if
Wachovia would not have lied) [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] If you deposited cash they
would not be available till Monday (August 18th). Your talking about
Caterbone] So what happened? [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] They would not be available till
the 18th. <br style="font-
Caterbone] I showed her (Wachovia Bank Teller). I said I want to use these funds for
the weekend. I .. Here is what happened. First I deposited the check. I said now wait.
I dont want to do that. I need these funds for the weekend. There was another
woman in line. (I waited until she was done with her transaction). I went back, she
did it over. She deposited the cash so I could use the card (Debit Check Card) for the
weekend. Plus, it had a $.20 balance in it. [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] You overdrafted.
Caterbone] She said that I could use the card for the weekend. [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] Marion Court.
Caterbone] That was not until Friday night, after I made the deposit.
Branch Manager] That too was on the 18th. [Stan J. Caterbone] No, that was on the 15th.
Branch Manager] That came through on the 18th. [Stan J. Caterbone] No it didnt. Your wrong. Why did
the send me a different transaction sheet (Monthly Wachovia Bank Statement)? Did
you look at the online statement and the paper statement? There was a $ .20 cent
balance. [Stan J. Caterbone] Well, somebody
is lying. [Stan J. Caterbone] Listen Sir. [Wachovia Bank Branch Manager] I dont know how it came in,
but you have an overdraft. [Stan J. Caterbone] Somebody lied to me. Somebodys lying.
 </div> 
CRIMINAL INDICTMENTS
Monday, October 19, 2009 4:39:59

AM <div style="text-align:
center;">PRIVATE CRIMINAL
COMPLAINT LANCASTER COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA October 19, 2009 This is a Work-In-Progress and is to be completed by early November of
2009. <div style="text-align: justify; font-family:
Verdana;">Summation: Due to
the actions and criminal activity of the foregoing, it is reasonable to prove that
every aspect of the Complainan't life, Stan J. Caterbone, is subject to undo
influence; harassment; torture; obstruction; etc. This situation and set of
circumstances as outlined here, and in the page "State of Affairs" and all previous
filings; reports; and statements, is a prescription for only one endgame - death or suicide. There is no life action
or activity that is immune from this horrendous HATE CRIME. The precedent
and landmark elements that make this so appalling is that the Complainant has
never done anything to set these circumstances in motion but to be right regarding
International Signal & Control back in 1987; as well as many other
proclamations and forecasts. That being said, it is also widely reported that
many Targeted Individuals and Victims of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control are lead to
death and/or suicide. The Lancaster Community-At-Large is guilty of creating;
abetting; fostering; and executing this tragedy. The fact that local; state; and
federal law enforcement induce and encourage this environment of hate is
landmark. </div> </div>DUKE STREET BUSINESS CENTER LANCASTER COUNTY LIBRARY
SYSTEM LANCASTER COUNTY LIBRARY DIANE PAWLING <ul><li>Aiding
and Abetting Liability for conduct of another;complicity, Title 18 Section
306</li><li>Unlawful use of computer, Title 18 Section
style="font-family: Verdana;">Criminal conspiracy, Title 18 Section
style="font-family: Verdana;">Harassment and stalking, Title 18 Section
style="font-family: Verdana;">Unsworn False Statements to Authorities, Section
4904 </li></ul>DR. AMINTA HAWKINS-BREAN, PH.D., VICE PRESIDENT STUDENT
AFFAIRS, MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY, JODIE RICHARDSON, SECRETARY
OF STUDENT AFFAIRS, MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY, LORI B. AUSTIN, DIRECTOR
OF JUDICIAL AFFAIRS, MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY, VICTOR DESANTIS, DIRECTOR,
GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEACH PROGRAM, MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY,
 MARJORIE M. WARMKESSLER, PH.D. HUMANTIES LIBRARIAN AND
LIBRARIAN INSTRUCTION COORDINATOR, MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY, <ul><li>Unlawful use of computer, Title 18 Section 3933</li><li>Criminal conspiracy, Title 18 Section 903</li><li>Harassment and stalking, Title 18 Section 2709Unsworn False Statements to Authorities, Section 4904 </li></ul> MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT,
MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY, <ul><li>Aiding and Abetting
Liability for conduct of another;complicity, Title 18 Section
30</li><li> </li></ul> NATHANIEL BOMBERGER,
LEGISLATIVE ASSISTANT, P. MICHAEL STURLA, PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES, <ul><li> </li></ul> JOHN ROCHAT, CHIEF OF POLICE,
MILLERSVILLE BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT, MILLERSVILLE BOROUGH POLICE
DEPARTMENT <ul><li>Aiding and Abetting Liability for conduct of
another;complicity, Title 18 Section 306</li><li>Unlawful use of
computer, Title 18 Section 3933</li><li>Criminal
conspiracy, Title 18 Section 903</li><li>Harassment and
stalking, Title 18 Section 2709</li><li>Unsworn False
Statements to Authorities, Section 4904 </li></ul>LANCASTER REGIONAL
MEDICAL CENTER, COLLEGE AVENUE, LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA, DR. L. WENGER,
LANCASTER REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, <ul><li>Unlawful use of
computer, Title 18 Section 3933</li><li>Criminal
stalking, Title 18 Section 2709 </li></ul>WEIS MARKETS,
SADSBURY, PENNSYLVANIA, WEIS PHARMACY SADSBURY, PENNSYLVANIA,
Verdana;">AMY BRENT, PHARMICIST, DISTRICT MANAGER, WEIS MARKET,
 <ul><li>Harassment and stalking, Title 18 Section 2709 </li></ul>CVS PHARMACY,
MANOR SHOPPING CENTER, LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA, <ul><li>Criminal
stalking, Title 18 Section 2709 </li></ul>FULTON FINANCIAL
CORPORATION, LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA, FULTON BANK, LANCASTER,
PENNSYLVANIA, MR. R. SCOTT SMITH, CEO, FULTON FINANICAL CORPORATION,
Verdana;">PHILLIP WENGER, COO, FULTON FINANICAL CORPORATION, MR. CRAIG
RODA, CEO FULTON BANK, MS DANA CHRYST, BOARD OF DIRECTORS, FULTON
FINANICAL CORPORATION, <ul><li>Criminal conspiracy, Title
18 Section 903</li><li>RICO; Corrupt
organizations, Title 18 Section 911</li><li>Theft by
unlawful taking or disposition, Title 18 Section 3921</li><li>Theft by
failure to make required disposition of funds received , Title 18 Section
3927 </li><li>Theft by extortion, Title 18 Section 3923 </li></ul>LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, NEW HOLLAND DENTAL CLINIC, NEW HOLLAND, PENNSYLVANIA,
 DR. WEST, NEW HOLLAND DENTAL
CLINIC, LANCASTER NEWSPAPERS, INC.,
LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA, STEVE WEAVER, MANAGER, LANCASTER
NEWSPAPERS, JOHN BUCKWALTER, BOARD OF DIRECTORS, CHAIRMAN, LANCASTER
NEWSPAPERS, <ul><li>HIGH INDUSTRIES, LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA, FRANK MCCABE, HIGH HOTELS, S. DALE HIGH, HIGH INDUSTRIES, BARLEY SNYDER, LLC., LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA,
Verdana;">SHAWN LONG, ESQ., BARLEY
SNYDER, LLC, Criminal conspiracy, Title 18 Section 903 <ul><li>Harassment and stalking,
Title 18 Section 270</li><li>RICO; Corrupt
organizations, Title 18 Section 911</li><li>Theft by
failure to make required disposition of funds received , Title 18 Section
3927 </li><li>Theft by extortion, Title 18 Section
family: Verdana;">WGAL TV-8, LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA, PAUL QUINN, GENERAL MANAGER, WGAL TV-8,
Verdana;">DOUG ALLEN, WGAL TV-
8, JANELLE STELLSON, WGAL TV-8,
Verdana;">SUSAN SHIPIRO, WGAL TV-8,
Verdana;">BARBARA BARR, WGAL TV-
8, LANCASTER COUNTY BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS, LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, COPY MAX/IMPRESSO OFFICE MAX, RED ROSE COMMONS, LANCASTER,
PENNSYLVANIA, LANCASTER COUNTY CLERK OF
COURTS, LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, RYAN P. AUMENT, LANCASTER COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL EMERGENCY
DEPARTMENT, NURSE 1 OF JULY 13, 2009 OF THE
LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT, NURSE 2 OF JULY 13, 2009 OF THE LANCASTER
GENERAL HOSPITAL EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT, DR. VITO DICAMILLO OF THE LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL
EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT, WACHOVIA
BANK, HERSHEY AVENUE AND MANOR STREETS, LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA,
Verdana;">BRANCH MANAGER, WACHOVIA
BANK, HERSHEY AVENUE AND MANOR STREETS, LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA,
Verdana;">ANNIE BAILEYS RESTUARANT AND
BAR, <ul><li>Criminal conspiracy, Title 18 Section 903MARION COURTROOM RESTUARANT AND BAR, MARION STREET CAFE,
Verdana;">MIKE GEESEY, PROPRIETOR, MARION COURTROOM, ALLEY KAT BAR AND RESTUARANT, JOHN KATRAS, PROPRIETOR, ALLEY
KAT BAR AND RESTUARANT, BRETT STABLEY, MANAGER, ALLEY KAT BAR AND
RESTUARANT, <ul><li>ROSA ROSA RESTUARANT, </li></ul>THE VILLAGE
NIGHTCLUB, GEORGE SOUKAS, MANAGER, THE VILLAGE NIGHTCLUB, RUBY TUESDAY, RESTUARANT BAR AND GRILL, MANOR SHOPPING
CENTER, <ul><li>Criminal conspiracy, Title 18 Section 903VALENTINOS CAFE, LANCASTER BRICKYARD BAR, LANCASTER COUNTY RESTUARANT ASSOCIATION, Criminal
conspiracy, Title 18 Section 903 DAVID PFLUMM,
Verdana;">Criminal conspiracy, Title 18 Section 903 Harassment and stalking, Title 18
Section 2709 PENNSYLVANIA CAREER LINK, LIBERTY PLACE,
LANCASTER, LANCASTER EMPLOYMENT TRAINING AGENCY (LETA), MARK
SPRUNGER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, LETA, </li></ul>REDROSE TRANSIT
AUTHORITY (RRTA), DAVID KILMER, RED ROSE TRANSIT AUTHORITY, LANCASTER CITY POLICE BUREAU, KIETH SADDLER, CHIEF OF POLICE,
LANCASTER CITY POLICE BUREAU, SGT. RICHARD COSMORE,
LANCASTER CITY POLICE BUREAU, Unsworn False Statements to Authorities, Section 4904RICO; Corrupt organizations, Title 18 Section 911Theft by unlawful taking or disposition, Title 18 Section
style="font-family: Verdana;">Theft by failure to make required disposition of funds
received , Title 18 Section 3927 </li></ul>LANCASTER CITY
HOUSING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT, MR. MCGUIRE, LANCASTER CITY
HOUSING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT AND NON-UNIFORMED UNION,
REPRESENTATIVE LANCASTER CITY POLICE UNION, LANCASTER CITY POLICE UNION, Unsworn False Statements to Authorities, Section 4904RICO; Corrupt organizations, Title 18 Section 911 RICHARD GRAY, MAYOR , CITY OF LANCASTER, LANCASTER COUNTYWIDE COMMUNICATIONS, WILLIAM RICHARD PLANK, RESIDENTS OF 1200 BLOCK FREMONT STREET, LANCASTER, PA ,
Verdana;">LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEY OFFICE, CRAIG STEDMAN,
LANCASTER DISTRICT ATTORNEY, MICHAEL
LANDIS, DETECTIVE, LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTY. OFFICE, PRESIDENT JUDGE, LOUIS FARINA, LANCASTER
COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, JUDGE JAMES P. CULLEN, LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON
PLEAS, OMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE,
Verdana;">THOMAS CORBETT, PENNSYLVANIA
ATTORNEY GENERAL / UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
OFFICE FO THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSLVANIA IN PHILADELPHIA, ERIC HOLDER, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Verdana;">FEDERAL BUREA OF
INVESTIGATION (FBI), HARRISBURG OFFICE, FEDERAL BUREA OF INVESTIGATION (FBI), PHILADELPHIA OFFICE,
Verdana;">SHERYL CROW, INTERSCOPE
RECORDING ARTIST, UNITED STATES NATIONAL
SECURITY AGENCY (NSA) UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (D.O.D.), DEPARTMENT
OF DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, (DIA), ROBERT GATES, UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, BARRACK OBAMA, UNITED STATES
PRESIDENT COPY
MAX/IMPRESSO OFFICE MAX, RED ROSE COMMONS, LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA,
LANCASTER COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS,
LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, RYAN P. AUMENT, LANCASTER COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS STEVE MIDCIFF, CEO, LANCASTER REGIONAL
HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; DR. ANTHONY
MASTROPIETRO, MEDICAL DIRECTOR, LANCASTER REGIONAL HOSPITAL,
LANCASTER, PA.; LINDA S. WENGER, PA-C,
LANCASTER REGIONAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; CHRISTINE M. DANG, M.D., LANCASTER REGIONAL HOSPITAL,
Verdana;">MASTROPIETRO ASSOCIATES
FAMILY PRACTICE, NOLL DRIVE, LANCASTER, PA.; BLACK AND BLACK DENTAL, WILLOW ST., PA.; DR. JOHN BLACK III, BLACK AND BLACK DENTAL, WILLOW ST., PA.;
Verdana;">SOUTHEAST HEALTH CLINIC,
BRIGHTSIDE BAPTIST CHURCH, LANCASTER, PA.; DR. LEO DORIZYNSKI, PSYCHIATRY DEPARTMENT, LANCASTER GENERAL
HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; DR. SEAN
COLDREN, M.D., PSYCHIATRY DEPARTMENT, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL,
Verdana;">DR. EMILY PRESSLEY, M.D.,
PSYCHIATRY DEPARTMENT,LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA..;
Verdana;">DR. DANIEL McINTYRE, M.D.,
LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA.; LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHIATRY,
Verdana;">DR. TATE, LANCASTER EMERGENCY
ASSOCIATES OF LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, LANCASTER, PA..; AMY MILLHOUSE, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL,
Verdana;">OFFICER ERIC McCRADY,
LANCASTER CITY BURAEU OF POLICE, LANCASTER, PA.; LANCASTER COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH/MENTAL RETARDATION
DEPARTMENT, COUNTY OF LANCASTER, LANCASTER, PA.; JAMES McLAUGHLIN, DISECTOR, MENTAL
HEALTH/MENTAL RETARDATION DEPARTMENT, COUNTY OF LANCASTER, LANCASTER, PA.; CRISIS INTERVENTION OF
LANCASTER COUNTY; MR. McCARDY, EXECUTIVE
DIRECTOR, CRISIS INTERVENTION OF LANCASTER COUNTY' BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, COUNTY OF LANCASTER, PA.; DENNIS STUCKEY, CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS, COUNTY OF LANCASTER, PA.; HOUSE OF PASTA, BAR & RESTAURANT, MILLERSVILLE PIKE,
Verdana;">YORGEY'S RESTAURANT &
BAR, NORTH QUEEN ST., LANCASTER, PA.; UPS COPY STORE, STONE MILL PLAZA, LANCASTER, PA.; ART WARD, PROPERIETOR, UPS COPY STORE, STONE
MILLPLAZA, LANCASTER, PA.; PENNSYLVANIA
STATE POLICE TROOP J. LINCOLN HIGHWAY EAST, LANCASTER, PA.; COMMANDER, PA. STATE POLICE TROOP J, LINCOLN
HIGHWAY EAST, LANCASTER, PA.; PENNSYLVANIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION(PENNDOT); BEVERLY POINTS, ESQ., LEGAL COUNSEL, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION; LANCASTER
COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SHERIFFS, COUNTY OF LANCASTER, PA.; TERRY BERGMAN, SHERIFF OF LANCASTER COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF SHERIFFS, COUNTY OF LANCASTER, PA.; MARK REESE, CHIEF
DEPUTY, LANCASTER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SHERIFFS, COUNTY OF LANCASTER,
PA. <ul><li>Aiding and Abetting Liability for conduct of another;complicity, Title 18
Section 306</li><li>RICO; Corrupt organizations, Title 18 Section
style="font-family: Verdana;">Theft by unlawful taking or disposition, Title 18
Section 3921</li><li>Theft by failure to make required disposition of funds
received , Title 18 Section 3927 </li></ul>LENS CRAFTERS,
LANCASTER, PA., DR. JOHN H. BROADDUS &
ASSOCIATES, OPTOMETRISTS, LANCASTER, PA., CARTRIDGE WORLD, LANCASTER, PA., KOHLS DEPARTMENT STORE, LANCASTER, PA., EYEMART EXPRESS STORE, LANCASTER, PA., DR. HARRY BREITMAN, LANCASTER, PA., OFFICE MAX STORE #854, LANCASTER, PA., CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, CIA, LANGLEY, VIRGINIA, LEON PANETTA, DIRECTOR, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE
AGENCY, LANGLEY, VIRGINIA JAMES STREET
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA ALLIED BARTON SECURITY SERVICES 
FLEEING CHARGE SCANDAL
Updated Monday, October 26, 2009

7:36:02 AM <div style="text-align:
justify;">Corruption of Public Officials: Southern Regional Police; Sgt. Buser
of Southern Regional Police; Chief of Police John Fiorill of Southern Regional Police;
MDJ Maynard Hamilton; ADA Deborah Muzereus, Esquire; District Attorney Donald
Totaro; District Attorney Craig Stedman; Judge James P. Cullen; President Judge Louis
Farina; The Clerk of Courts Office; Court Administrator Mark Dalton; Joseph Masse,
Esq., of Judicial Conduct Review Board; Thomas Corbett, Attorney General of
Pennsylvania. </div> <div
style="text-align: justify;">Short Summation: Malicious Prosecution of a Fabricated
Charge resulted in a conviction that defendant was denied the right to
appeal. Libel and Slander by Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge
James P. Cullen. "It is my view, having read all of the material that you've
submitted, that your mental health problems, whatever they may be, are of long-
standing duration and since this offense carries a maximum penalty of two years'
supervision or two years' incarceration, they will not be resolved in that period of
time." <a style="color: rgb(0, 0, 153);" target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/court-transcripte-of-
fleeing-case-no-3179-06-sentencing-hearing-october-24-2007.pdf"
class="RE">Quote from Judge James P. Cullen
during October 24, 2008 Sentencing Hearing.</a> </div> Superior
Court Docket Sheet Case No. 113MDA 2008 Entries 1. November
19, 2008 Dismissed for Failure to File Brief Per Curiam Comment: ATTY SHALL
PROVIDE CERTIFICATION W/IN 10 DAYS OF NOTICE TO CLIENT 2. November
26, 2008 Application for Extension of Time to File Appellant Caterbone, Stanley J.
Comment: MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPLICATION FOR
REARGUMENT. 3. December 8, 2008 Application for Reconsideration of Order
Appellant Caterbone, Stanley J. 4. December 30, 2008 Order Denying
Application for Extension of Time to File Per Curiam Comment: AS MOOT
 5.
December 30, 2008 Order Denying Application for Reconsideration Per
Curiam Library of
Documents Supporting Above Claims 1. <a style="font-family: Verdana; font-weight: bold; color:
rgb(0, 0, 153);" target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/criminal-charges-
dismissed-updated-october-26-2009.pdf" class="RE">CRIMINAL CHARGES
DISMISSED updated October 26, 2009 </a> 2. <a style="font-family: Verdana;
font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 153);" target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/fleeing-case-notes-
in-preparation-of-preliminary-hearing-of-july-5-2006.pdf" class="RE">Fleeing Case
Notes in Preparation of Preliminary Hearing of July 5, 2006 </a> 3. <a style="font-weight: bold; font-family: Verdana; color:
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/superiorcourtreport-
113-mda-2008.pdf" class="RE">SuperiorCourtReport 113 MDA 2008 </a> 4. <a style="font-weight: bold; font-
family: Verdana; color: rgb(0, 0, 153);" target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/complete-scanned-
case-fleeing-docket-number-3179-2006.pdf" class="RE">Complete Scanned Case
Fleeing Docket Number 3179-2006 </a> 5.
<a style="font-family: Verdana; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0,
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/judge-cullen-3179-
06-motion-to-dismiss-campbell-august-8-2008.pdf" class="RE">Judge Cullen 3179-
06 MOTION to Dismiss Campbell August 8, 2008 </a> 6. <a style="font-weight: bold; font-family: Verdana; color: rgb(0,
0, 153);" target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/3179-2006-motion-
to-dismiss-counsel-paul-campbell-dec-27-2007.pdf" class="RE">3179-2006 Motion
to Dismiss Counsel Paul Campbell Dec 27 2007 </a> 3179-2006 Motion
to Dismiss Court Appointed Longer Nov 2 2007 </a> 8. <a style="font-family: Verdana; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0,
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/court-transcripte-of-
fleeing-case-no-3179-06-sentencing-hearing-october-24-2007.pdf"
class="RE">Court Transcript of Fleeing Case No. 3179-06 Sentencing Hearing
October 24, 2007 </a> 9. <a
style="font-weight: bold; font-family: Verdana; color: rgb(0, 0, 153);"
target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/email-from-paul-
campbell-re-3179-06-errors-in-statement-of-matters-complained-jan-16-2008.pdf"
class="RE">Email from Paul Campbell re 3179-06 Errors in Statement of Matters
Complained Jan 16, 2008</a><br style="font-family: Verdana; color: rgb(0, 0,
target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/email-to-paul-
campbell-re-fleeing-case-in-supeior-court-113-mda-june-25-2008.pdf"
class="RE">Email to Paul Campbell re Fleeing Case in Supeior Court 113 MDA June
25, 2008 </a> 11. <a style="font-
family: Verdana; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 153);" target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/letter-from-paul-
campbell-re-06-3179-fleeing-appeal-to-superior-court-april-3-2008.pdf"
class="RE">Letter from Paul Campbell re 06-3179 Fleeing Appeal to Superior Court
April 3, 2008 </a> <span
weight: bold; font-family: Verdana; color: rgb(0, 0, 153);" target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/caterbone-v-
penndot-bureua-of-licensing-appeal-re-fleeing-nov-28-2007e280a6.pdf"
class="RE">Caterbone v PENNDOT Bureau of Licensing Appeal re Fleeing November
28 2007</a> Judge Cullen 3179-2006 RECONSIDERATION Order &
Brief of August 14 Denial for New Attorney August 14, 2008 </a> 14. <a style="font-weight: bold; font-family:
Verdana; color: rgb(0, 0, 153);" target="_blank"
06-order-denied-motion-to-dismiss-campbell.pdf" class="RE">Judge Cullen 3179-06
ORDER Denied Motion to Dismiss Paul G. Campbell </a> Letter from Mark Dalton Court Administration re 3179-2006 Fleeing
Case January 11, 2008 </a> 16. <a
style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 153);" target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/lancaster-general-
hospital-ca-e2809306-03349-southern-regional-police-transcript-of-april-5-2006.pdf"
class="RE">Lancaster General Hospital CA06-03349 Southern Regional Police
Recording of Fleeing Event Transcript of April 5, 2006</a><a style="font-weight:
bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 153);" target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/letter-from-mark-
dalton-court-administration-re-3179-2006-fleeing-case-january-11-2008.pdf"
class="RE"></a> Lancaster General Hospital
Notes;Memos; and Medical Reports for 302 Petition (Fleeing) on April 5,
2006</a> 
STAN J. CATERBONE BIO
<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: center">ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP STAN J.
CATERBONE BIOGRAPHY RECLAMATION - LITIGATION -
RESEARCH The Continuation of a Process to Be Restored To
Whole Since 1987. </DIV> Updated -
Thursday, May 07, 2009 1:40:29 PM

<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify" align=justify> Present - Advanced
Media Group and Global Entertainment Group, Ltd., , President, Owner, and Founder.
 Advanced
Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone have been engaged in RECLAMATION; (assets; real estate; personal and business
real property; intellectual property; and business interests) LITIGATION; and RESEARCH since 2005 in federal and state courts. All
activities are for the purpose of restoring Advanced Media Group and all affiliated
companies and Stan J. Caterbone to WHOLE. Stan J. Caterbone was recently accepted into
the Graduate Studies and Research Program at Millersville University in April of
2009 where a more formal research approach to mind control and MKULTRA
programs will be studied. Other studies will be considered in the areas of law;
finance; computer science; and philosophy. </DIV>
Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media
Group are not able to continue it's litigation until it's security needs are satisfied and
it's computer/electronic property is returned and/or
replaced. In 2006 Stan J. Caterbone began his role as
an <A class=RE style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,0)"
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Activist_shareholder" target=_blank>Activist
Shareholder</A> for <A class=RE style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,0)"
href="http://www.fult.com/" target=_blank>Fulton Financial</A>, which is listed as
"FULT" on the NASDAQ stock exchange. As a founder of <A class=RE
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,0)"
target=_blank>Financial Management Group, Ltd.</A>, a full service financial firm,
Stan J. Caterbone has drawn upon the success in developing the strategic vision for
his company and the experience gained in directing the legal affairs and public
offering efforts in dealing with Fulton Financial. Stan J. Caterbone has been in
recent discussions with the Fulton Financial Board of Directors with regards to
various complaints dealing with such issues as the Resource Bank acquisition and
the subprime failures. Stan J. Caterbone believes that Fulton Financial needs
management to become more aggressive in it's strategic planning and the
performance it expects from it's management team in order to increase shareholder
value. Expanding the footprint of the regional bank has not yielded an
increase to the bottom line that is consistent with the expectations of
shareholders. Lancaster County has seen several local banking institutions
acquired by larger regional banks, thus increasing the competition Fulton Financial
will see in it's local marketplace as well as in it's regional footprint.
 
<DIV style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">In 2005 Stan J. Caterbone, as a Pro Se Litigant
filed several civil actions as Plaintiffs that are in current litigation in the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States Third
District Court of Appeals, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, The Pennsylvania
Superior Court, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, The Court of Common
Pleas of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. These litigations include violations of
intellectual property rights, anti-trust violations, and interference of contracts
relating to several business interests. Central to this litigation is the Digital Movie,
Digital Technologies, Financial Management Group, Ltd,/FMG Advisory, Ltd., and its
affiliated businesses along with a <A class=RE href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=7kOIOTpxtj8" target=_blank>Federal False Claims Act or Federal Whistleblowers Act regarding
the firm of International Signal and Control, Plc., (ISC) the $1Billion Dollar Fraud and
the Export violations of selling arms to South Africa and Iraq. This litigation dates
back to 1987.</A> Stan J. Caterbone was a shareholder of ISC, and was
solicited by <A class=RE style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255)"
href="gpage13.html" target=_blank>ISC executives for professional services.</A> The Federal False
Claims Act is currently part of RICO Civil Complaint in the United States District
Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals,
as docket no. 05-2288. In
2005 Advanced Media Group/Project Hope filed a Civil Action in the Court
of Common Pleas of Lancaster County against Drew Anthon and the <A class=RE
href="http://www.edenresort.com/rooms.cfm" target=_blank>Eden Resort Inn</A>
for their attempts to withhold the Tourism Tax and Hotel Tax that supports the <A
class=RE style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,0)"
href="http://www.lancasterconventioncenter.com/" target=_blank>Downtown
Lancaster Convention Center & Marriot</A>. We also proposed an alternative
plan to move the Convention Center to the <A class=RE style="BACKGROUND-
COLOR: rgb(255,255,0)" href="http://www.hotelbrunswick.com/index.html"
target=_blank>Hotel Brunswick</A> and Lancaster Square to all of the major
stakeholders. The Lancaster County Convention Center is finally under construction
with a March 2009 Opening date. In
2005 I began our philanthropic endeavors by spending our energies and
working with such organizations as; ONE.org, Livestrong.org, WoundedWarriors.org,
The Clinton Global Initiative, Lancaster Convention Center Authority, Lancaster
Chamber of Commerce, Toms Project Hope, People to People International,
GlobalWarming.org, Contact Lancaster/24 Hour Suicide Hotline, Schreiber Pediatric
Center, and numerous others. In
2004 I embarked on our past endeavors in the music and entertainment
industries with an emphasis on assisting for the fair and equitable distribution of
artists rights and royalties in the fight against electronic piracy. We have attempted
to assist in developing new business models to address the convergence of physical
and electronic mediums; as it displaces royalties and revenues for those creating,
promoting, and delivering a range of entertainment content via wireless
networks. In 2000 to 2002 I developed an array of marketing and
communication tools for wholesalers of the <A class=RE style="BACKGROUND-
COLOR: rgb(255,255,0)" href="https://www.aiminvestments.com/portal/site/aim"
target=_blank>AIM Investment Group</A> and managed several communication
programs for several of the company wholesalers throughout the United States and
Costa Rica. We also began a Day Trading project that lasted until 2004 with
success. In 1999 I
developed a <A class=RE style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,0)"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2007/09/excelsior-business-
plan-aug-18-2006-updated-feb-10-sept-26-2007.pdf" target=_blank>comprehensive
business plan to develop the former Sprecher Brewery, known as the Excelsior
Building</A> on E. King Street, in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. This plan was developed
in conjunction with the Comprehensive Economic Development Plan for the
Revitalization of Downtown Lancaster and the Downtown Lancaster Convention
Center for the former Watt & Shand building. In 1999 I contributed to the debate, research, and
implementation of strategies to counter the effects of the global Y2K threat to the
worlds computer technologies. I attended the <A class=RE style="BACKGROUND-
COLOR: rgb(255,255,0)"
href="http://www.thelionofjudah.org/newsletter/Nov_99.htm" target=_blank>U.S.
Sponsored Y2K symposium and Conference in Washington, D.C</A>. hosted by the Senate Y2K
Subcommittee and Senator William Bennett. In 1998 I had began to administer the charity giving of
Toms Project Hope, a non-profit organization promoting education and awareness
for mental illness and suicide prevention. We had provided funding for the Mental
Health Alliance of Lancaster County, Contact Lancaster (The 24/7 Suicide Prevention
Hotline), The Schreiber Pediatric Center, and other charitable organizations and
faith based charities. The video <A class=RE style="BACKGROUND-COLOR:
rgb(255,255,0)" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=olG_WGiMB8Y"
target=_blank>"Numbers Don't Lie"</A> have been distributed to schools, non
profit organizations, faith based initiatives, and municipalities to provide educational
support for the prevention of suicide and to bring awareness to mental illness
problems. In 1996 I had
done consulting for companies under KAL, Inc., during the time that I was controller
of Pflumm Contractors, Inc., I was retained by Gallo Rosso Restaurant and
Bar to computerized their accounting and records management from top to
bottom. I had also provided consulting for the computerization of accounting
and payroll for Lancaster Container, Inc., of Washington Boro. I was retained
to evaluate and develop an action plan to migrate the Informations Technologies of
the <A class=RE style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,0)"
href="http://www.jaygroup.com/" target=_blank>Jay Group, formally of Ronks,
PA</A>, now relocated to a new $26 Million Dollar headquarters located in West
Hempfield Township of Lancaster County. <A class=RE style="BACKGROUND-
COLOR: rgb(255,255,0)" href="http://local.lancasteronline.com/4/213022"
target=_blank>The Jay Group</A> had been using IBM mainframe technologies
hosted by the AS 400 computer and server. I was consulting on the merits of
migrating to a PC based real time networking system throughout the entire
organization. Currently the Jay Group employees some 500 employees with
revenues in excess of $50 Million Dollars per year. In 1993 I was retained by Pflumm Contractors, Inc.,
as controller, and was responsible for saving the company from a potential
bankruptcy. At that time, due to several unpaid contracts, the company was facing
extreme pressure from lenders and the bonding insurance company. We were
responsible for implementing computerized accounting, accounting and contract
policies and procedures, human resource policies and procedures, marketing
strategies, performance measurement reporting, and negotiate for the payment of
unpaid contracts. The bonding company was especially problematic, since it was the
lifeline to continue work and bidding for public contracts. The Bank of Lancaster
County demanded a complete accounting of the operations in order to stave off a
default on the notes and loans it was holding. We essentially revamped the entire
operation. Within 3 years, the company realized an increase in profits of 3 to 4
times its previous years, and record revenues. In 1991 I was elected to People to <A class=RE
href="http://www.ptpi.org/Default.aspx" target=_blank>People International and the
Citizen Ambassador Program</A>, which was founded by President Dwight D.
Eisenhower in 1956. The program was founded to To give specialists from
throughout the world greater opportunities to work together and effectively
communicate with peers, The Citizen Ambassador program administers face-to-face
scientific, technical, and professional exchanges throughout the world. In 1961,
under President John F. Kennedy, the State Department established a non-profit
private foundation to administer the program. We were scheduled to tour the Soviet
Union and Eastern Europe to discuss printing and publishing technologies with
scientists and technicians around the world. In 1990 I had worked on developing voice recognition
systems for the governments technology think tank - <A class=RE
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,0)" href="http://www.nist.gov/"
target=_blank>NIST (National Institute for Standards & Technology)</A>. I co-
authored the article Escaping the Unix Tar Pit with a scientist from NIST that was
published in the magazine DISC, then one of the leading publications for the CD-
ROM industry. Today, most all call centers deploy that technology whenever you call
an 800 number, and voice recognition is prevalent in all types of applications
involving telecommunications. In
1989 I had founded Advanced Media Group, Ltd., and was one of only 5 or
6 U.S. domestic companies that had the capability to manufacture CD-ROM's. We
did business with commercial companies, government agencies, educational
institutions, and foreign companies. I performed services and contracts for the
Department of Defense, NASA, National Institution of Standards & Technology
(NIST), Department of Defense, The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
(DARPA), and the Defense Mapping Agency, Central Intelligence Agency, (CIA), IBM,
Microsoft, AMP, Commodore Computers, American Bankers Bond Buyers, and a host
of others. I also was working with R.R, Donnelly's Geo Systems, which was
developing various interactive mapping technologies, which is now a major asset of
Map Quest. Map Quest is the premier provider of mapping software and applications
for the internet and is often used in delivering maps and directions for Fortune 500
companies. We had arranged for High Industries to sell American Helix, the
manufacturer of compact discs, to R.R. Donnelly. We had brokered a deal and the
executives from Donnellys Chicago headquarters flew to Lancaster to discuss the
deal and perform due diligence of the manufacturing facility located in the
Greenfield Industrial Park. <A class=RE style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,0)"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2007/09/power-station-
studios-avatar-blog-version.pdf" target=_blank>In 1987 Power Station Studios of
New York</A> retained me as executive producer of a motion picture project. The
theatrical and video release was to be delivered in a digital format; the first of its
kind. We had originated the marketing for the technology, and created the concept
for the Power Station Digital Movie System (PSDMS), which would follow the
copyright and marketing formula of the DOLBY technology trademark. We had also
created and developed marketing and patent research for the development and
commercialization of equipment that we intended to manufacture and market to the
recording industry featuring the digital technology. Sidel, Gonda, Goldhammer, and
Abbot, P.C. of Philadelphia was the lead patent law firm that We had retained for the
project. Power Station Studios was the brainchild of Tony Bongiovi, a leading
engineering genius discovered by Motown when he was 15. Tony and Power Station
Studios was one of the leading recording studios in the country, and were
responsible for developing Bon Jovi, a cousin. Power Station Studios clients included;
Bruce Springsteen, Diana Ross, Cyndi Lauper, Talking Heads, Madonna, The
Ramones, Steve Winwood, and many others. Tony and Power Station Studios had
produced the original Sound Track for the original Star Wars motion picture. It was
released for distribution and was the number one Sound Track recording of its time.
Tony Bongiovi was also active in working and researching different aerospace
technologies. * We had developed and authored a Joint Venture Proposal for SONY to
partner with us in delivering the Digital Movie and its related technologies to the
marketplace. The venture was to include the commercialization of technologies,
which Tony Bongiovi had developed for the recording industry simultaneously with
the release of the Digital Movie. I also created the concept for the PSDMS
trademark, which was to be the Trademark logo for the technology, similar to the
DOLBY sound systems trademark. The acronyms stand for the Power Station
Digital Movie System. Today, DVD is the mainstay for delivering digital movies on a
portable medium, a compact disc. In 1987 I had a created and developed FMG Mortgage Banking, a
company that was funded by a major banking firm in Houston Texas. We had the
capability to finance projects from $3 to $100 million dollars. Our terms and rates
were so attractive that we had quickly received solicitations from developers across
the country. We were also very attractive to companies that wanted to raise capital
that include both debt and equity. Through my company, FMG, we could raise equity
funding through private placements, and debt funding through FMG Mortgage
Banking. We were retained by Gamillion Studios of Hollywood, California to secure
financing of their postproduction Film Studio that was looking to relocate to North
Carolina. We had secured refinancing packages for Norris Boyd of and the Olde
Hickory and were in the midst of replacing the current loan that was with
Commonwealth National Bank. We had meetings and discussions with Drew Anton
of the Eden Resort, for refinancing a portion of his debt portfolio. We were quickly
seeking commitments for real estate deals from New York to California. We also had
a number of other prominent local developers seeking our competitive funding,
including Owen Kugal, High Industries, and the Marty Sponougle a partner of The
Fisher Group (owner of the Rt. 30 Outlets). We were constantly told that our
financing packages were more completive than local institutions. In 1986 I had founded Financial Management
Group, Ltd (FMG); a large financial services organization comprised of a variety of
professionals operating in one location. We had developed a stock purchase
program for where everyone had the opportunity for equity ownership in the new
firm. FMG had financial planners, investment managers, accountants, attorneys,
realtors, liability insurance services, tax preparers, and estate planners operating
out of our corporate headquarters in Lancaster. In one year, we had 24 people on
staff, had approximately 12 offices in Pennsylvania, and several satellite offices in
other states. We had in excess of $50 million under management, and our advisors
were generating almost $4 million of commissions, which did not include the fees
from the other professionals. We had acquired our own Broker Dealer firm and were
valued at about $3 to $4 million. In
1985 I developed the Easter Regional Free Agent Camp, the first Free
Agent Camp for the Professional Football industry; which was videotaped for
distribution to the teams scouting departments. (See Washington Post page
article of March 24, 1985) Current camps were dependant on the team scouts to
travel from state to state looking for recruits. We had developed a strategy of video
taping the camp and the distributing a copy, free of charge to the teams, to all of
the scouting departments for teams in all three leagues FL, CFL and WFL. My
brother was signed at that camp by the Ottawa Roughriders of the CFL, and went on
to be a leading receiver while J.C. Watts was one of the leagues most prominent
quarterbacks. My brother also played 2 years with the Miami Dolphins while Dan
Marino was starting quarterback. We were a Certified Agent for the National Football
League Players Association. Gene Upshaw, the President of the NFLPA had given me
some helpful hints for my camp, while we were at a Conference for agents of the
NFL. The Washington Post wrote a full-page article about our camp and associated it
with other camps that were questionable about their practices. Actually, that was
the very reason for our camp. We had attended many other camps around the
country that were not very well organized and attracted few if any scouts. We had
about 60 participants, with one player coming from as far away as Hawaii. We held
the camp at Lancaster Catholic, with a professional production company filming the
entire camp, while I did the editing and produced the video. The well respected and
widely acclaimed professional football scout, Gil Brandt, of the Dallas Cowboys, had
given me support for my camp during some conversations We had with him and
said he looked forward to reviewing the tapes for any hopeful recruits.
 In 1985 I was elected Vice
President of the Central Pennsylvania Chapter of the International Association of
Financial Planners, and helped build that chapter by increasing membership 3to 4
times. We had personally retained the nationally acclaimed and nationally
syndicated Financial Planner, Ms. Alexandria Armstrong of Washington D.C.; to host
a major fundraiser. More than 150 professionals attended the dinner event that was
held at the Eden Resort & Conference Center. Ms. Armstrong discussed
financial planning and how all of the professions needed to work together in order to
be most effective for their clients. We attracted a wide variety of professionals
including; brokers, lawyers, accountants, realtors, tax specialists, estate planners,
bankers, and investment advisors. Today, it has become evident that financial
planning was the way of the future. In 1986 executives approached us from Blue
Ball National Bank to help them develop a Financial Planning department within
their bank. In 1984 I had
helped to develop strategic planning for Sandy Weill, former President of Citi Group
(the largest banking entity in the U.S). We were one of several associates asked to
help advise on the future of Financial Planning and how it would impact the
brokerage and the investment industry at large. Mr. Weil was performing due
diligence for the merger of American Express and IDS (Investors Diversified
Services). We were at that time a national leader in the company in delivering Fee
Based Financial Planning Services, which was a new concept in the investment
community and mainstream investors. That concept is now widely held by most
investment advisors. </DIV>
IS LANCASTER GROUND ZERO?
<div style="text-align: justify;">September 7, 2009 012:32:00 PM Stan J. Caterbone Advance Media
Group 1250 Fremont Street Lancaster, Pennsylvania
17603 Derrick
Robinson <a style="font-family: Verdana;"
target="_blank" href="http://www.freedomfchs.com/" class="RE">Freedom
From Covert Harassment and Surveillance</a> P.O. Box 9022 Cincinnati, Ohio 45209 Phone 1-800-571-
5618 Fax 1-866-433-4170 email:
info@freedomfchs.com Re: Is County of Lancaster,
Pennsylvania Ground Zero for Organized Stalking and Covert Surveillance?
 Derrick, My pleasure. Derrick, I was trying to get group rates at our
new Lancaster Convention Center Marriot Hotel last week, just as a little
fact finding mission. I have a theory that I would like to send your way. I
thought it would be very fruitful to bring some TI's together for a
conference, unless you think the exposure would be harmful. I believe that they try new models for
harassment; organized stalking and surveillance on me here in Lancaster.
Remember, Lancaster is now one of the most "Watched Communities" in
the country. "With those cameras, the Safety Coalition will operate and
monitor 165 cameras across Lancaster City making Lancaster the most
watched city of its size in the nation." See article attached, Watching you:
City to add 105 more cameras. I believe that Lancaster may be ground zero for some of the
models of organized stalking and harassment that we TI's experience and
wanted to get some reaction from Lancaster. Some history on the
Lancaster Convention Center first. Dale High of High Industries is the lead
partner in our new convention center/hotel. It is first class all the way.
Now in the late 1980's I was a joint venture partner with Dale High in
American Helix Technology Company/Advanced Media Group. American
Helix was a cd manufacturer and I and my company Advanced Media
Group was the CD-ROM division of American Helix. I was one of a handful
of CD-ROM manufacturers in the domestic United States back then. Also
in 2005 I filed a civil action against the lead hotel, the Eden Resort Inn, for
trying to block the development and building of the Hotel/Convention
Center, see attached. Now,
some history about Lancaster and the intelligence community. <a
target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroupresearch.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/ln
p-isc-headlines-may-22-2007.pdf" class="RE">Back in the 1980's there
were several defense contractors located in Lancaster, the main being
International Signal & Control, which I, of course, blew the whistle on
a billion dollar fraud and arms to Iraq.</a> <a
target="_blank"
class="RE">Click here for an overview of ISC.</a> <a
target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroupresearch.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/is
c-search-lancaster-newspapers-archives-dec-25-2007.pdf"
class="RE">Click here to see the Lancaster Newspapers Archives
regarding International Signal & Control, or ISC.</a> C<a
target="_blank" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kOIOTpxtj8"
class="RE">lick here to view the live video of the WGAL-TV News
Broadcast of October 31, 1991 the evening of the ISC indictments. The
U.S. Department of Justice and other U.S. Agencies held a Press
Conference in the Philadelphia Federal Courthouse to announce the
indictments and $ Billion Dollar Fraud.</a> <a target="_blank"
href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9gTaCexSNc" class="RE">Click
here for Part 2 of the WGAL-TV 8 Broadcast.</a> Now politically, Lancaster is and has always been
predominately Republican. Lancaster is one of the oldest cities in the
country and our courthouse was one of the first in this country. Lancaster
has one of the oldest fraternities of the Masons. Lancaster and the
George W.Bush administration has a close and very "interesting
relationship". George H. Bush had a very close relationship with ISC, and
of course the NSA and CIA all had a very "close" relationship with
International Signal & Control, or ISC. The following are some
transcripts for Ted Koppel and ABC News Nightline regarding ISC and Arms
to Iraq and the intelligence community. <a style="font-family:
Verdana;" target="_blank"
class="RE">The transcripts are contained in my Amicus for Case No. 2006-
cv-2160 filed in the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern
Division.</a> Now, Robert Gates, presently the Secretary of the
United States Defense Department, and his relationship to Lancaster.
First of all, the attached video is the authentic transcript of Robert Gates'
confirmation hearing in September of 1991 for the Director of the Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA). If you fast forward to approximately 9:00:00
you will see the back and forth questions from Senator Murkowski to
Robert Gates regarding the allegations by several members of the U.S.
Senate Select Committee on Intelligence regarding his alleged
involvement with ISC and the Arms deals with Carlos Cardoen and the
shipping of cluster bombs through South Africa and on to Iraq. Of course,
he denied all of the allegations. Robert Gates also has relatives that live in
Lancaster County,
i<a style="font-family: Verdana;" target="_blank"
href="http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?
p_product=LC&p_theme=lc&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=2
00&s_dispstring=headline%28Robert%20Gates%29%20AND%20date
%28last%206%20months%29&p_field_date-
0=YMD_date&p_params_date-0=date:B,E&p_text_date-0=-
6qzM&p_field_advanced-0=title&p_text_advanced-0=
%28%22Robert%20Gates
%22%29&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&xcal_usewei
ghts=no" class="RE">f fact he attended a wedding here a few months
ago, on May 3, 2009 at St. John Neuman Catholic Church in Manhiem
Township, Lancaster County. His wife has a niece that lives in Manheim
Township.</a> Now, I'll give you the ABC
News Nightline May 23, 1991 excerpt regarding ISC and the NSA, National
Security Agency: "It all
started legally, if covertly, back in 1974. That's when the National
Security Agency, a super-secret U.S. Intelligence unit asked ISC to help
complete project X, a chain of electronic listening posts based at South
Africa's Simonstown Naval Station. South Africa was using these posts to
follow Soviet submarine traffic off of the Cape of Good Hope. To ensure
secrecy, ISC and the NSA made sure shipments could not be tracked back
to them. They created a company called Gamma Systems Associates. In
fact, this company was nothing more than a post office box at John F.
Kennedy Airport. Gamma was a cut-out. ... But this sanctioned covert
operation was stopped in 1977 when President Carter, a strong opponent
of South Africa's apartheid regime, told U.S. firms to stop any military-
related business with Pretoria. But ISC continue shipping electronics,
some civilian, some military, to South Africa. The in the early 1980's,
South Africa began to intensify its efforts at ballistic missile development.
For ISC, that was a golden opportunity because on of its top executives
was a man named Clyde Ivey, an American electronics expert who has
been the father of South Africa's missile program. Ivey had extraordinary
contacts in the nations defense structure. Begining in 1984, federal
investigators say, senior ISC exeutives, including Ivey, began regular
contacts with CIA officials." You can read the rest. The entire transcript of
the May 23, 1991 ABC News/Nightline broadcast. Now remember, George H. Bush was director of CIA.
"He served in this role for 357 days, from January 30, 1976 to January 20,
1977.[22] The CIA had been rocked by a series of revelations, including
those based on investigations by Senator Frank Church's Committee
regarding illegal and unauthorized activities by the CIA, and Bush was
credited with helping to restore the agency's morale.[23] In his capacity
as DCI, Bush gave national security briefings to Jimmy Carter both as a
Presidential candidate and as President-elect, and discussed the
possibility of remaining in that position in a Carter administration[24] but
it was not to be," according to Wikipedia. Now, lets get to Bobby Ray Inman, former Navy, Director of the
National Security Agency (NSA), former Director of International Signal
& Control (ISC), and currently part of the Mind Control industry. The
following appears on the Welcome page of my website: "S.A.I.C. involvement in 1993 American
Para psychological Association meeting arrangements, via their 'Cognitive
Sciences Laboratory'. Science Applications International Corporation is a
big time defense contractor, has held the largest number of research
contracts of any defense contractor. Bobby Ray Inman (ISC Board of
Directors) is on its board of directors, among others." by
John Porter, CIA Program on Mind Control copyright 1996. 
In 1994, after Bobby Ray Inman
requested to be withdrawn from consideration as Bill Clinton's first
Defense Secretary, his critics speculated that the decision was motivated
by a desire to conceal his links to ISC. Inman was a member of the so-
called "shadow board" of the company which was allegedly either
negligent or approved the exports." by Wikipedia on International Signal and Control,
(ISC). Now, lets list the former
Navy personnel: <ul><li> George H. Bush, former President of the United States,
former Director of CIA.</li><li>James
Guerin, President and Founder of International Signal &
Control.</li><li>Bobby
Ray Inman, former Director of the National Security Agency (NSA) and
Director of International Signal & Control, (ISC).My father, Samuel P. Cateronne, Jr.His father, Samuel J. Caterbone, Sr.George Noory, of Coast to Coast Radio (just anecdotal, nothing
assumed or alleged).</li><li>George
W. Bush flew with the Navy.</li><li>I will
Finish later and add more.</li></ul>Next we get to Jim Guerin's attorney back in 1989 through at
least 1992. His name was Joseph Tate, of Philadelpha. <a
target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/joseph-f-
roda-documents-for-sammy-guerin-june-29-2007.pdf" class="RE">This link
will take you to a document regarding Joseph Tate, James Guerin and
Joseph Roda, Esq., of Lancaster, my former attorney who said I fabricated
everything back in 1987</a>. The document contains a letter of
September 12, 2005 from Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald regarding
Scooter Libby, Former Vice President Dick Cheney's Chief of Staff.
the letter involves Scooter Libby's Grand Jury Indictment for leaking
Covert CIA Operative Valerie Plame and eventually outing her.
 Now in Austin Texas in July of 2005 I was detained by 2 Agents
from The Defense Intelligence Agency. I was merely visiting a
Military Museum, that had old and vintage helicopters and airplanes. near
where my brother, Dr. Phillip Caterbone lived. I was visiting on my
way to California. While inside the museum 2 Agents from the
Department of Defense Defense Intelligence Agency escorted me outside
to my Honda Oddesey and interrogated me making me confirm that I was
visiting and staying with my brother. They caused a problem for my
brother's Medical Practice by shaking up one of his secretaries. <a
target="_blank"
class="RE">The reviewed my court documents for CATERBONE v.
Lancaster County Prison, et. al., Case No. 2005-cv-0288 filed in the U.S.
District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania</a>. The
demanded that I stay off all military bases before releasing
me. In 2006 I was telepathic
with an older NSA executive on many occasions who wanted to meet me at
the Clipper Stadium who told me he wanted to rent a facility in Lancaster
for a training exercise. I told him to to and see Dale High and the High
Group for space at the Greenfield Industrial Park. He said he was retiring
and that our discussions were keeping him a few weeks longer than
expected. We had intimate discussions of my history and the Chesapeake
Bay Area. We also discussed Sheryl Crow, and he told me his wife was a
fan. I turned him on to her new album, Wildflower, and he said she liked
it. We had to disengage because he was being harassed by other
telepathic assailants. My
former secretary (Susan Bare) at Pflumm Contractors, Inc., where I was
controller and was hired to rescue the company from near bankruptcy in
1993, told me that her husband, Ross Bare, who grew up just some 10 or
so doors from me, worked for the NSA. She disclosed this soon after I
hired her in 1994 or 1995. I will
finish later later and add to this allegation. This is a work-in-
progress. Stan J.
Caterbone Advanced Media Group www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com <hr
style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"> </div>
State of Affairs
<div style="text-align: justify;">Summation: Due to the actions and criminal activity of the foregoing <a
style="color: rgb(0, 0, 204); font-weight: bold;" target="_blank"
class="RE">(see Criminal Indictment Page)</a>, it is reasonable to prove that
every aspect of the Complainants life, Stan J. Caterbone, is subject to undo
influence; harassment; torture; obstruction; etc. This situation and set of
circumstances as outlined here, and in the page "State of Affairs" and all previous
filings; reports; and statements, is a prescription for only one endgame - death or
suicide. There is no life action or activity that is immune from this horrendous HATE
CRIME. The precedent and landmark elements that make this so appalling is that
the Complainant has never done anything to set these circumstances in motion but
to be right regarding International Signal & Control back in 1987; as well as
many other proclamations and forecasts. That being said, it is also widely reported
that many Targeted Individuals and Victims of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control are lead
to death and/or suicide. The Lancaster Community-At-Large is guilty of creating;
abetting; fostering; and executing this tragedy. The fact that local; state; and
federal law enforcement induce and encourage this environment of hate is
landmark. </div> <hr style="width: 100%; height:
2px;"> <div style="text-align: center;"><div style="text-align: left;"></div><div style="text-
align: left;">Sunday, November 8, 2009
6:29:27 AM </div>William Lefty Plank and 1252 Fremont Street In Action! This is my
next door neighbor that the City of Lancaster; the Mayor of Lancaster; and the City of
Lancaster Police Department SUPPORT in the THREATS; HARASSMENT;
VANDALISM; AND THEFTS TO ME AND 1250 FREMONT STREET FOR THE PAST 3
YEARS. COLLUSION TO COMMIT EXTORTION BY THE INSURANCE COMPANIES;
THE POLICE; THE MAYOR; AND MY FAMILY. <object style="font-weight: bold; font-family: Verdana;" height="285"
width="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/01ULZ_-
emug&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&amp
;border=1"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param
name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/01ULZ_-
emug&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&amp
;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always"
allowfullscreen="true" height="285" width="340"></object> </div><div style="font-family: Verdana; text-align: center;"><div
style="text-align: center;">VANDALISM; THEFT; AND HARASSMENT REPORT </div><div
style="text-align: center;">This report only goes back to August 11, 2009 and is
more for </div>an inventory of vandalized and stolen property than
Harassment. Older incidents can be viewed on the Home
Page. </div> <div style="text-align: center; font-weight: bold;">Advanced Media Group AND Stan J.
Caterbone </div><div
style="text-align: center;">1250 Fremont
Street, Lancaster, PA 17603 scaterbone@live.com www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com 717-717-826-5354 Facsimile 888-
533-3606</div> <hr><div style="text-align: justify;"><div style="margin-left:
40px;">Now, let's review
the record concerning the security of 1250 Fremont Street. In the past few years
the following has taken place: </div><div style="margin-left: 40px;"><div style="margin-left:
40px;"><ul><li>
I was denied contents insurance by
the Spiziri Insurance group.</li><li style="font-family: Verdana;">I was
denied a security system with monitoring by Select Security, owned and operated
by Patrick Egan, of Lancaster, Pennsylvania.</li><li style="font-family: Verdana;">I
was unable to purchase a functioning biometric finger print lock-set.</li><li
style="font-family: Verdana;">The Lancaster City Police Department refuse to take
any complaints of vandalism or thefts; dating back to 2007.</li><li style="font-
family: Verdana;">The insurance company, State Farm, that insures the contents of
1250 Fremont Street under my mother's property and casualty company refuses to
pay.</li><li style="font-family: Verdana;">The Pennsylvania Departmtment of
Insurance refuses to enforce the insurance laws of Pennsylvania regarding the
above.</li><li style="font-family: Verdana;">The Federal Bureau of Investigation
(FBI) refuses to meet with me. </li><li style="font-family:
Verdana;">Lancaster City Mayor Rick Gray, after more than four (4) meetings
refuses to do anything but ask who owns 1252 Fremont Street.</li><li style="font-
family: Verdana;">Lancaster City Chief of Police Keith Saddler refused mediation
through a process that was I initiated with the Lancaster Mediation Center.</li><li
style="font-family: Verdana;">The County of Lancaster, through a Meeting with
Former Administrator Mark Esterbrook also refused to engage in any Mediation
process in December of 2007.</li><li style="font-family: Verdana;">My Family
refused mediation through the Lancaster Mediation Center during the same time
that I filed with the Lancaster City Police Department.</li><li>My Family refused to cooperate with State Farm Insurance and
File Claim for Damaged and Stolen Property from 1250 Fremont
Street.</li><li>I have been paid for
multiple claims of thefts and vandalism by Harleysville Insurance Company for my
property at 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA over the past 10 or so
years. </li></ul></div></div> <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;">November 8, 2009 - In
Summary <ul><li style="font-family: Verdana;">This is the first day
of November that I am able to update this website. The Computer Hackers
have kept me from editing and updating this site for the past 9 days.</li><li
style="font-family: Verdana;">The U.S. This District Court is days away from issuing
a Case No. for my Preliminary Emergency Injunction. I submitted the
requested In Form Pauperis Application and Case Management Forms to the Clerk of
Courts on Thursday, November 5, 2009. It was mailed certified from the
Harrisburg Pike Post Office in Lancaster, Pennsylvania.</li><li style="font-family:
Verdana;">In the past 5 days I have taken more pain medication due to
electromagnetic weapons since the Lancaster General Hospital Pain Assault this
past July when I had the emergency surgery in my mouth.</li><li style="font-
family: Verdana;">I continue to have to take items purchased back for exchange or
refunds, the most recent were clothes purchased at Walmart last week.</li><li
style="font-family: Verdana;">There continues to be a steady stream of night time
visitors to 1252 Fremont Street.</li><li style="font-family: Verdana;">The
neighbors of 1250 Fremont Street have stepped up their stalking and
harassment.</li><li style="font-family: Verdana;">The water that suspiciously
appears in front of my kitchen sink has re-emerged on Friday and Saturday.</li><li
style="font-family: Verdana;">The hot tub water has not needed to be re-filled for
about 6 weeks. The perps stopped taking the water out on a daily
basis.</li><li style="font-family: Verdana;">Of course, they continue to torchure
me with the computer hacking, at times they mix that with mental harassment and
electromagnetic weapons. I usually sound the horn to counter these
attacks.</li><li style="font-family: Verdana;">I was continuously harassed and
stalked during the early evening of First Friday at Gallery Row on November 3,
2009. Doug Beck, is one of them. His father still lives some 12 doors
down from me. This summer he showed off his Masonic Ring to me at Fulton
Bank in the Manor Shopping Center.</li><li style="font-family: Verdana;">Craig
Roda has been around me 3 times in the past week. Is he trying to send a
message from Fulton Bank, he is the President. I don't appreciate the
stalking. </li><li style="font-family: Verdana;">My brother Dr. Phillip
Caterbone has been in Lancaster since Friday, November 3, 2009; and is leaving
today. We are scheduled for breakfast this morning. He said he was
staying at the new Marriot in Downtown Lancaster.</li><li>I will try to detail these incidents in the coming
days. </li></ul> <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"> To: Lancaster City Police
Department <ul><li>October 30, 2009</li></ul>Second
Assault in less than a week, October 29, 2009. <a style="font-weight: bold; color:
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/audio-manheim-
twp-police-dept-re-assault-by-driver-october-24-2009.mp3" class="RE">First Assault
last Saturday morning, October 24, 2009 at Dillerville Road and Manheim
Pike.</a> Last evening at about
6:15pm I got into my truck (<a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 102);"
target="_blank" href="www.freedomfchs.com" class="RE">to meet Ken Rhoades,
another TI who came to meet with me from Michigan from the Freedom From Covert
Harassment and Surveillance Organization, or FFCHS)</a> at the Manor Cinema,
and noticed a green/tan GMC Jimmy parked a in front of 1244 Fremont St. It was
sitting high on its wheels, and two white males approached from the opposite side
of Fremont Street, both drinking beers. I did not recognize the vehicle or the 2
white males. <div style="text-align: justify;"> I became suspicious and drove down the block watching them in
my rear view mirror. The popped the hood and were hanging around the vehicle
looking very suspicious. I turned around in the alley on the opposite side of Fremont
Street down near the end of our block and went and parked on the opposite side of
the Fremont Street at about 1247. One male was in the drivers seat on a cell phone
and the other was looking under the hood. I took out my camera and tried to take a
picture of the them using my outside mirror, so not to let them see me.
 Then 3 white males, two that live in 1242 Fremont
Street, and one that keeps visiting and says he is the brother of the tall white male
of 1242 Fremont Street. This male, short dark hair, about 5'6" and about 135lbs
approached me. Now he keeps stalking me. He always parks his car, a dark green
small compact, near my house and stalks me. He always is coming and going when
I am. He comes up to my truck and asks me why I am taking a picture of his car,
which is parked right in front of me. I tell him I was taking a picture of the truck
across the street and he starts yelling at me to mind my own business. He tells me
he is going to call the police, I tell him to do that or I will and say I live right there
pointing to my house. I tell him to stay away from me and my house and he starts
in a rage and comes closer and slams his hand against my car door really loud, I
sped away to the Manor Cinema and ran out of gas. Ken Rhoades pulled up on a silver chevy pickup truck introduces himself.
I was shook up and told him what happened. I put more gas into my truck and
instead of going to get Ken a hotel for the night, I asked him to instead follow me to
my house for our meeting. We first went to Turkey Hill to get some gas, then we
went to my home/office at 1250 Fremont Street and had our meeting. After about
an hour and a half we went to the Iron Hill Brewery at F&M for dinner, then I
took Ken to the Days Inn on Lititz Pike where he is staying. We will have another
meeting today to film a video of Ken's story for YouTube. The occupants/visitors of 1242 Fremont Street have been a problem for
me with harassment and stalking for more than a year. The guy who used to drive
the silver/maroon van who stalked me the most, even in downtown Lancaster has
not been around for a few months. </div>October 29, 2009 <ul><li
style="font-family: Verdana;">The computer hackers were caught
yesterday, Wednesday, October 28, 2009 working for the Lancaster County
Courthouse and trying to stop the mailing of the U.S. Preliminary Emergency
Injunction from reaching the Clerk of Courts at the U.S. District Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. </li><li
style="font-family: Verdana;">Before I had left my home/office I
had downloaded several files that I needed to be printed; all were sent to Staples
via their online submission. Staples also had an order to print the U.S.
Preliminary Emergency Injunction and the Exhibits. It was also the last day to
file my Praecipe for Reinstatement for Case No. CI-08-13373 in the Lancaster
County Court of Common Pleas.</li><li style="font-family:
Verdana;">I first went to the Lancaster County Courthouse to print
the necessary files from my flash drive in the Lancaster County Prothonotary Office,
as I have been doing for more than a year. The files were not in my flash
drive. The computer hacker some how deleted the files before I ejected the
flash drive from my computer at my home/office. </li><li style="font-
family: Verdana;">The computer that I usually print from was being
used by a person that started to ask me to help him; he was harassing me and
trying to distract me. Fortunately, WORD came on the computer and I was
able to write a new Praecipe from scratch and complete the reinstatement
file. However, being that the staff at Staples always tries to harass me and
change my files, I had to go back home and make a CD-ROM of the files in case
Staples tried to say the did not receive them; which they have done on several
occasions.</li><li style="font-family: Verdana;">At
Staples, every document was printed wrong, they were all printed on double-sided
paper and everything had to be printed again. However, I did get to the
U.S.P.S. Post Office on Harrisburg Pike before closing at 7:00pm and was able to mail
the Preliminary Emergency Injunction to the Clerk of Courts in
Philadelphia.</li><li style="font-family: Verdana;">The
stalkers from Lancaster Catholic High School were all around me, starting at with
Mimi Tomilnson Newcomer on Fremont Street when I left; Fulton Bank, Dino
Diapaolo, the Lancaster County Courthouse, Craig Roda and Mary Glah Genovesse;
Jack Scwartz (Not of Catholic High but of Conestoga) of Friendly Taxi and Red Rose
Transit; Alex Diapaolo at the House of Pasta on Millersville Pike. For the
record regarding Lancaster Catholic High, Judge James P. Cullen and Joe Roda, Esq.
were classmates a year or two before my brother Samuel Caterbone. They all
knew each other. </li><li style="font-family: Verdana;">Today I find
out that a U.S.P.S. Priority Mail Package containing the Camcorder purchased on
Ebay that did not work, was stolen from the Downtown Lancaster Post Office.
The tracking number comes up with no record indicating that the seller never
received the camcorder; which explains why he never paid me the $103.65 refund
he owes me. This is the second problem in 2 weeks with mailings from the
Downtown Lancaster Post Office on Chestnut Street; of course it figures, it is right
across the street from the Lancaster City Police Headquarters.<hr style="width:
100%; height: 2px;"></li></ul>October 27, 2009 <ul><li>For the past three weeks someone has been putting water in front of my
kitchen sink; wetting the floor and my feet. There is no consistency as to
when it happens, and it appears to be from 1252 Fremont Street. I have not
had any water taken from my hot tub in the same time period. One day
these bastards will fry. </li><li>Yesterday,
Monday October 26, 2009 I had to take Vicodin and a muscle relaxer for the
pain. Someone also deleted my appointment in my Google Electronic
Calender and I missed my dentist appointment. I had to reschedule for
today. The
electromagnetic weapons were on full force. The computer hacking is almost impossible to deal with.
 </li><li>On Sunday, October 25, 2009 they started to use
directed energy devices and electromagnetic weapons on my back, causing sever
back pain, along with the usual mental harassment and computer hacking. I
also had some food stolen from my house. I went to the Weis Markets to
purchase ingredients, and the rest of the ingrediants for the recipe which I already
had were stolen. </li><li>On Saturday, October 24, 2009 I was Assaulted in the
Streets of Lancaster. A white male got out of his car, pounded
on the passenger side door, tried to get in my truck, and chased me through the
intersection at Dillerville Road and Manhiem Pike. I tried to stop in the middle
of the intersection at a red light, and tried to get someone to help me. I sped
away to the Manhiem Township Police Department, where I wired myself with an
audio recorder. You can listen to the recording by clicking
here. The Pennsylvania Statute for Criminal Assualt and
Battery is Title 18 Section 2701 to 2703, an assault/battery is committed when one
person 1) tries to or does physically strike another, or 2) acts in a threatening
manner to put another in fear of immediate harm. Many states declare that a more
serious or "aggravated" assault/battery occurs when one 1) tries to or does cause
severe injury to another, or 2) causes injury through use of a deadly weapon.
Historically, laws treated the threat of physical injury as "assault", and the
completed act of physical contact or offensive touching as "battery," but many
states no longer differentiate between the two.</li><li>Since 2005 I have been assaulted on at least 4 occasions and law
enforcement continues to ignore this Organized Stalking and Harassment.
Hopefully when I file my Emergency Preliminary Injunction in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, something will be done about
this. </li><li>On the evening of
Saturday, October 24, 2009 Erica Wietzel of the Lancaster County Adult Probation
and Parole Department was again stalking me. This time it was at Jack's in
Millersville. She had a friend harass me. Erica was my probation
officer for the Fleeing Charge. <a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0,
href="http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/gpage39.html" class="RE">I
have just put up a web page regarding that scandal, click
here.</a></li></ul> October 24, 2009 <ul><li
style="font-family: Verdana;">Strong
Electomagnetic Weapons fired on me. On Friday, October 23, 2009 the Lancaster
County Court Reporters Office had made a huge mistake. I sent
them the following email: <ol><li> "Just how do you reconcile your accounts.
The receipt is from the Court Reporters Office yet I made the check out to you
personally. Your balance sheet would not be right. The Court Reporters Office Cash
Account, which is a short term asset, would be short.</li><li>Just because it has
been a practice of your office does not mean it is a legal practice.</li><li>She did
not offer the $.30 cents back, I had to say something first.</li><li>I know how to
validate and verify a cd-rom. If my computer was hacked to find no data on the cd-
rom, it is the same as nothing being on the CD-ROM.</li><li>After visiting with you
today, Friday, October 23, 2009 and again leaving without the CD-ROM you have
proven your guilt; all you did was try to annoy and harass me.</li><li>In addition,
you stated that the transcript is on your laptop, that in no way is a secure
environment and system for court related documents.</li><li>See ya
soon." </li></ol></li><li style="font-family: Verdana;">On Thursday, October
22, 2009 at Fulton Bank at the Manor Shopping Center I went to my safety deposit
box and wanted to download some files from my laptop to my 500GB external hard
drive in storage. There is an electrical outlet in the booth. The little
babies at Fulton Bank turned it off before I got there so I could not back-up my
files. I have done this many times at both this branch and the branch on
Columbia Avenue. Of course had the Computer Hackers not vandalized my
DVD burner in my laptop, I would not have had to do this.</li><li style="font-
family: Verdana;">Then I went to the Lancaster County Elections Office at North
Queen Street to get a copy of a CD-ROM that contains a database of all registered
voters of the County of Lancaster through the newly revised Open Records
Law. The took my $20.00 check and told me it would take a few days, which
does not sound right. We'll see.</li><li style="font-family: Verdana;">Finally,
on Thursday, October 22, 2009 I went to the Lancaster County Unit Collections
Department and made my first $50.00 payment, which was due by October 31,
2009 and then to the Lancaster County Court Reporters Office with a Money Order
for a transcript of the October 24, 2007 Sentencing Hearing held by Judge James P.
Cullen. The cost as $56.70 and I had a $57.00 money order. (I was in
there the day before, gave them $57.00 cash, and after an hour gave me an excuse
that all of a sudden it would not be done until the next day. I demanded my
cash back and told them I'll try it again on another day.) I get the paper copy
and the CD-ROM of the electronic file home and find the CD-ROM is blank,
containing no electronic file of the transcript. </li><li style="font-family:
Verdana;">On Wednesday, October 21, 2009 the
Lancaster Community Surged me with Harassment and Burglaries. It
started with the usual computer hacking. There were stolen items from the
U.S. mails, stolen items from my home/office, extorted funds, stolen items from the
Sears Warehouse of my items on Layaway. I did receive my Social Security
check in the mail. Of course it states on the front of the envelope the crime
and the payment date if the envelope is tampered with.</li><ul><li style="font-
family: Verdana;">On October 9th, 2009 I mailed a copy of the United Nations
Council for Human Rights Complaint and CD-ROM to the Secretary of State,
Hillary Clinton, to the Department of State in Washington, D.C.. It was
received and signed for on October 14, 2009 however someone stole the
Certified Return Receipt from the U.S. Mails. Yesterday I went to the
downtown Lancaster Post Office, where I
initially mailed it, and they gave me a copy of a scan that said a M. Jackson signed
for it on October 14, 2009.</li><li style="font-family: Verdana;">I took my
check to the Wachovia Bank branch on Manor Street to deposit before 2:00 pm and
they, of course, harassed me again. I had to cash the check then deposit the
cash. They wanted to confuse me and have me deposit the check,
which would not have made the funds immediately available for my debit/credit
card.</li><li style="font-family: Verdana;">Before I left my home/office I searched
for my file "Sears Layaway" folder. It contained the receipts of payments for
an air compressor and 4-piece Driver Drill Combo Kit. Both items were
vandalized so I was replacing the tools. I find that it was stolen. So I
had no copies of the Layaway receipts. I find it suspicious that the day before
I received a flyer in the mail from Sears advertising add-on tools for the
Driver Drill Kit. This usually is a sign from the perps trying to let me know
they stole the file.</li><li>I get to Sears and
spend about 45 minutes getting the Checkout Clerk to take my $175.00 payment to
complete the Layaway purchase. They had a wrong phone number in
addition to the stolen receipts. They instruct me to go to the rear of the Auto
Center at Merchandise Pick-up. The clerks at Merchandise Pickup declared
that the 4-piece Driver Drill was lost. My problem was that the kit in the store
did not have a hammer drill, and the item I had on layaway did. I, of course,
also purchased the items at a reduced sales price. I told them to forget about
the air compressor, which they had, and said I demanded a full refund. So I
went back into the Sears Store for a full refund of $275.00.</li><li>It took about an hour of harassment and lies, and
some stalling by some manager named Dave Clark (he took my credit card and
$175.00 payment receipt and disappeared from the check-out register) to finally get
my Visa Credit Card Refund Receipt for the $275.00 and a $5 dollar bill for the
Layaway transaction fee. So, I finally left with a $275.00 Refund Receipt,
$5.00 and my credit card.</li><li>I
wake up the next morning (Thursday, October 22, 2009), after working on my laptop
computer during the night, and the $275.00 Refund Receipt was stolen from my
home/office while I was sleeping. </li></ul></ul> <hr style="width: 100%; height:
2px;"> October 21,
2009 <ul><li>Yesterday, Tuesday October 20, 2009
Lancaster City and Lancaster City Police Extort More Money while Harassing and
Psychologically Assaulting Me - The Classic Surge.</li><ul><li>It started out when I parked on the first block of West
King Street, the last parking spot before the entrance to the Hager Parking
lot. I went to the meter and a black male approached me who was waiting
near the parking meter. As I
put my dollar bill in the meter after punching in the spot number, the black male
suspiciously started asking me how to use the meter and started peering over my
shoulder. Unfortunately, the meter printed out a "Refund Ticket" rather than
a "Parking Ticket". Well, legally I paid the City of Lancaster $1.00 for parking;
I was not going to put another $1.00 in the meter. I did not know why it
would not print the "Parking Ticket". </li><li>The day before I was given a quote of $0.13 cents per page for
scanning paper documents at the Capitol Copy Service. <a style="font-
weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 255);" target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/ups-downtonw-
lancaster-franchise-agreements-arpil-26-2005.pdf" class="RE">Remember my
proposal and Exclusive Rights to a Downtown Lancaster UPS Copy
Store.</a> See my Downtown Lancaster Investment Plan for details. Well I
needed 2 receipts copied and they kept stalling. In addition to taking my
time, the owner tried to charge me a surcharge of $3.50 for computer time, which
he never mentioned. He said he would wave the charge this time. Had
I known about the $3.50 computer charge I would have never went into downtown
Lancaster in the first place. I would have found another way to scan the
documents. </li><li>When I
returned to my car I had a parking ticket for $10.00 with a time stamp of 38 minutes
from the time I had parked; which did not surprise me in the least.
So, of course I drove straight to the
Lancaster City Treasurer's drive up window at the Lancaster City Police Station to
have the parking ticket for $10.00 dismissed. I did pay for
parking.</li><li>The clerk at the
window acted confused, told me she could not dismiss the parking ticket and asked
me to come inside. I parked my truck and went inside where she had me talk
to the City Customer Service Representative. I explained what had
happened.
The woman got snippy and called the
Lancaster Parking Authority. Her explanation was that if the Lancaster City
Parking Authority found the parking meter to be faulty they would dismiss the
ticket; otherwise I had to pay the ticket. I argued that I did pay for
parking. The Lancaster Parking Authority had my $1.00. She kept
arguing that I did get a refund. I looked at her and told her the "Refund
Ticket" was not legal tender, it was only a piece of paper - I did not get a refund; I
got a piece of white paper worth absolutely nothing and was not legal tender.
The Lancaster City Parking Authority had my $1.00 of legal tender. I asked
for the "Refund Ticket" back and said she was "nuts".</li><li>I walked to my car and a Lancaster City Police officer
walked out toward me, spit on the ground about 12 feet in front of me. I spit
at the ground. He got all charged up and shouted "did I offend you?". I
stated no, I just ate a roll of smarties, courtesy of the counter at the customer
service desk. He turned and walked to an unmarked car. I noticed he
was chewing tobacco. </li><li>I
suspect the entire event was set up and the Lancaster City Police wanted to either
cite me for harassment or a 302 petition; in addition to extorting the $11.00 from
me. Had I not been so quick at the Capitol Copy Center, they would have
gotten another $3.50 cents from me.</li><li>I cannot leave my house without being harassed; tortured; and having
monies stolen from me; no matter where I go or what I do.</li><li>Summation: Due to the actions and criminal activity
of the <a style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255); font-weight: bold;" target="_blank"
class="RE">foregoing</a>, it is reasonable to prove that every aspect of the
Complainants life, Stan J. Caterbone, is subject to undo influence; harassment;
torture; obstruction; etc. This situation and set of circumstances as outlined here,
and in the page "State of Affairs" and all previous filings; reports; and statements, is
a prescription for only one endgame - death or suicide. There is no life action or
activity that is immune from this horrendous HATE CRIME. The precedent and
landmark elements that make this so appalling is that the Complainant has never
done anything to set these circumstances in motion but to be right regarding
International Signal & Control back in 1987; as well as many other
proclamations and forecasts. That being said, it is also widely reported that many
Targeted Individuals and Victims of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control are lead to death
and/or suicide. The Lancaster Community-At-Large is guilty of creating; abetting;
fostering; and executing this tragedy. The fact that local; state; and federal law
enforcement induce and encourage this environment of hate is
landmark.</li></ul></ul> <hr style="width: 100%; height:
2px;">October 17,
2009 <ul><li style="font-family: Verdana;">Today, Saturday October
17, 2009 at 10:34AM Electromagentic Weapons and Mental Harassment at it's
extreme. Extreme torture and mental harassment. It started on Friday
and continues today. Sheryl will not shut her mouth up. She keeps
harassing me about everything. </li><li>Now I find out that a computer hacker deleted the incident report
regarding Comcast Cable. The cable was installed on September 5, 2009 on
a Saturday. When we called to have the service restored on my mothers
account, the customer service representative told me to have a money order
prepared. I ordered the installation online and have a transcript of the
chatline it reads"Bryan> Your monthly fee is $69.99 plus taxes and fees, there is
a one time installation fee of $81.45. Total to be paid upon installation is $151.44.
Please prepare check or money order.' and that is exactly what I had done.
Not only did I do half of the installation for the Comcast Contractor who did the
install; but the installer refused to accept the money order from CVS for
$152.00. He told me that "installers are not allowed to take money from
customers". I demanded twice for him to take the money order, and he
refused. Then he said that we got a $20.00 credit for him being late. I get the actual bill and the total is
$152.08, not $151.44 less the $20.00 credit as promised. They did credit the
$20.00 bu the total comes out to $152.08. Go Figure that out. So I
tried to pay the amount online, and I was not able to set up the online account
using the Comcast Account Number. So I called Comcast and the Service
Representative told me that I could set the online account to make online payments
because we did not receive the password in the mail to set up the online
account. The customer service representative told me not to worry that there
would be no monies due until the end of October. Of course in the meantime,
we get a $262.00 bill in the mail. They are not getting any monies until my
social security check arrives on October 21, 2009.</li><li>In 2006 I filed a civil action against Comcast and they
had to appear before MDJ Ballentine to defend against my complaint. Of
course, MDJ Ballentine lied; committed perjury; and obstructed justice by dismissing
me before a decision then saying that I left in the middle of a hearing. That
n.... will get it in the court of law by me some day; and hopefully I will put her in jail
for what she did to me. I was also chlorophormed in her office on too many
occasions.</li></ul>October 17, 2009 <ul><li
style="font-family: Verdana;">Friday, October 16, 2009 the Electromagnetic
weapons and devices were back again today. Had to take 1/2 of a 7.5mg
Vicodin after I returned home from courthouse, then the mental harassment
began.</li><li style="font-family: Verdana;">Someone discharged by battery and I
was not able to jump my truck at Staples with my battery charger. I had the
truck running with the doors locked and no key inside; so they probably turned of
the engine. A woman had to jump me using jumper cables. A service
station said the battery was bad, I know they shorted something out in my truck to
cause this problem.</li><li style="font-family: Verdana;">At least 2 people from
O'Halloran's bar stalked me at Fulton Bank; one was Michael Long and the other was
the long haired with the headband. I can't go out anywhere in Lancaster
without being harassed and stalked, and the Lancaster City Police are definitely
accessories to these crimes. Hell, they stalk and harass me as well.</li><li
style="font-family: Verdana;">My neighbors have had a habit of coming and going
when I do; but lately since they read that it is a common problem with Targeted
Individuals, they do it more often.</li><li style="font-family: Verdana;">As far as
the computer hacking; I witnessed three of my neighbors in the last year carry
computers into their homes; 1248, Dawn Sutton; 1246 Joy Hoover; and the punks at
1242. I'll eventually find out if they are or were hacking me or entering any
of my electronic accounts. They may also be using the computer to
harass and stalk me through one of the social networks. They may even be
using electronic surveillance on me through the use of their computers. This
would a crime under Pennsylvania law Unlawful use of computer/electronic device
under Title 18 Section 3933, HINT. </li></ul> <hr style="width: 100%; height:
2px;">October 15,
2009 <ul><li style="font-family: Verdana;">Computer Hacking is
almost unbearable on a daily basis. I can no longer make back-up discs with
my dvd burner. </li><li style="font-family: Verdana;">Today, October 15, 2009
Lancaster City Police respond to complaint regarding Computer Hacker turning
on/off Comcast Broadband Internet connection on or about 6:00AM.</li><li
style="font-family: Verdana;">There are now (3) items missing from the U.S. Mails
that were not delivered as of yet:</li><ul><li style="font-family: Verdana;">Monthly Social Security Check - Should have
arrived yesterday or today. Last months check arrived on Tuesday,
September 15, 2009.</li><li style="font-family: Verdana;">From Amazon Books a book titled "The True Story of
America's Psychic Warfare Program" ordered on October 9, 2009 and ships within 2
business days at the earliest. (Delivered on Friday, October 16, 2009 - You will find a
history of me raising hell then the item or transaction being successfully completed;
it pays me to raise a little hell) </li><li>Tickets to the upcoming
conference in Hershey Pennsylvania titled "Get Motivated" featuring Rudy Giuliani;
Zig Ziglar; Terry Bradshaw; etc., Called today to confirm I received tickets.
(Delivered on Friday, October 16, 2009 -You will find a history of me raising hell then
the item or transaction being successfully completed; it pays me to raise a little
hell) </li></ul><li>I am still
waiting for refunds from the following purchases on Ebay that arrived but did not
work; or were broken after they arrived at the Lancaster Post
Office:</li><ul><li>Konica
Camcorder Item No. 230377736684 Purchased on September 16, 2009 for $98.50
plus shipping.</li><li>Biometric
Fingerprint Weatherproof Lock Item No. 380084124236 Purchased on September 20,
2009 for $209.99. (filed a dispute because he wants me to wait 2 weeks for
refund) </li><li>(2) 16-
megabyte Flash Drives Item No. 270452661959 Purchased on September 21, 2009
for $19.98 plus shipping. (filed a dispute with
PayPal) </li></ul><li>So, for the record, as of today, October 15, 2009 I am
out-of-pocket $1,707.47 plus shipping charges of approximately
$70.00. </li></ul> <hr style="width: 100%; height:
2px;">Saturday, October
10, 2009 6:19:54 PM <ul><li>Last evening Friday, October 9, 2009 I had been harassed at (2) events
in Lancaster County.</li><ul><li>At
Charlie Smithgall's Campaign Headquarters as I was leaving; I was not harassed by
anyone in the front of his headquarters. If anyone cared to witness my
discussion with a tall fellow with gray hair, we had a previous relationship as
attorney/client for a very short time and I was simply making a point so he
understood the seriousness of the matter. I do not consider the fellow a foe,
for the record. The problem was when I was jump starting my car and the
long-haired red-neck that pulled the same stunt with me during a Neighborhood
Council Meeting at Southern Market, tried again to start
trouble.</li></ul><li>The other
incident of harassment happened during the "pounding" of Lancaster Catholic v.
Pequea Valley at Rosmere Stadium. Father Leo Goodman, Pastor of Saint
Mary's Catholic Church, of which I am a member, continues to harass and cause
problems with me. I have documented numerous other incidents by Father
Goodman. You may read the long history of problems that I have had with
the Roman Catholic Church by reviewing the document titled: "Stan J. Caterbone,
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control, and the Roman Catholic Church" in the New Document
Library page of this website. There are original letters and correspondence
dating back to 1998 when I was officially communicating and meeting with
executives of the Diocese of Harrisburg regarding harassment by parishioners of
Saint Mary's Parish and other Roman Catholics. I did wire myself with an
electronic recording device to insure that no one, especially law enforcement, could
lie about any harassment that may have taken place. They will always lie
and try to change the truth. It is the only way to protect myself from
malicious and wrongful prosecution. By the way, you do not have the
expectation of privacy at public events or facilities, according to the
law.</li></ul> <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;">Friday, October 9 5:53:13
AM <ul style="font-family: Verdana;"><li><a style="font-weight:
bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 204);" target="_blank" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=u22mphQsn5s&feature=player_embedded" class="RE">Did you know that
President Bill Clinton Apologized in 1995 for U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
Experiments? Click here to see the video of his statement.</a> </li><li>The
perps had the audacity to not only short my truck battery/electrical system, but
yesterday, my gas can was stolen with a gallon of gas in it. Of course I called
911 and an officer cam to my home (so he says) then went to Turkey Hill on Hershey
Avenue to find me and take a report. </li></ul> <hr style="width: 100%; height:
2px;">Thursday, October 8,
2009 8:23:32 AM <ul><li>Yesterday, Wednesday October 7, 2009 was another day of computer
hacking; harassment; stalking; and vandalism. The pain from
electromagnetic weapons on my back has now been countered, for now, or they are
just into torturing my mind. </li><li>They have a new model; follow me around and keep my truck battery
from charging. Ever since they drained the battery on Tuesday, it has not
fully charged. Now if I run the truck and restart without leaving the truck, it
will start. But the moment I leave the truck and return, the battery is
dead. This is just like the model of stealing my gasoline. I have reason
to believe that the punks of 1242 Fremont Street and/or William Lefty Plank's
Brothers (Bloods/Crypts/Peagens) have been doing this. There are too many
people from the 1200 Block of Fremont Street that continue to at least harass and
stalk me on a daily basis. </li><li>The staff at Wachovia Bank did everything in their power to try and
produce an overdraft fee. BJ's still has not credited the $181.00 for the
printer that was returned on the evening of October 6, 2009 and my PayPal did not
sweep the refund of $98.00 into my checking account at Wachovia
Bank.</li><li>I was finally able to
secure a new Dentist, Dr. John Cooper. His father was our orthodontist and I
went to Wheatland with his sister Mimi. <a style="font-weight: bold; color:
href="http://www.lancastergeneral.org/content/Lancaster_Cleft_Palate_Clinic.htm"
class="RE">His grandfather (I believe) founded the Lancaster Cleft Pallet Clinic in
1938. It went on to become one of the only clinics of it's kind in the
world.</a> Let it be known that Dr. John Cooper said that my teeth were in
good condition with only a small repair needed on a tooth with a small piece on the
top that is chipped. He laughed at the statement by Lancaster Regional
Hospital's "gingivitis" remark on all of my charts. Next month on October 26,
2009 I will have the tooth repaired and in November will get a full set of
xrays. Then we will work on restoring the extracted teeth that Lancaster
General had taken out, unnecessarily, of course; I should have been treated by
Black and Black Associates, or New Holland Dental Clinic, or the Southeast Clinic
before I required the extraction due to the infection getting into my bloodstream
from non-treatment. Remember, it took 4 Emergency Room visits from July
11 to July 19 until anyone would treat me. Oh that's right, I WAS
DELUSIONAL!</li></ul> <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;">Wednesday, October 7, 2009
6:53:23 AM <ul><li>On Sunday,
October 5, 2009 I changed my front door lock to my home/office at 1250 Fremont
Street, Lancaster, Pennsylvania. The back door is always locked with a
nightstick. These locks were never used and no one has any keys.
Since the Biometric Fingerprint Lock that I
received did not work, and Select Security refused to install a security system, for
no reason other than to continue the vandalism and thefts; I did what I could.
We'll see who is going to gain access. Would you all please help me in
keeping these perps out? In 2004 Dave Pflumm said "everyone" had
a key to 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga. He proved it by literally breaking
into my house (with Lizzy and Keegan) on Thansksgiving Day while I was in the
basement.; the day he told me the previous quote. I guess he figured since
he brought me a turkey, it would be alright. Unbelievable. </li><li>I mailed the
Complaint to the United Nations Council for Human Rights in Switzerland at the
Chestnut Street Post Office, and the receipt is timed at 12:01:51 Custom Form No.
LC775399807US on Tuesday, October 6, 2009.</li><li>Yesterday, Tuesday October 6, 2009 I had experience more
vandalism and thefts. It just doesnt stop. First I had purchased 2 pounds of turkey
thigh at Central Market to make my turkeyJerky. I went to Weis Markets after filing
Exhibit A-38, Case No. 08-13373 at the Courthouse, and when I rode away I realized
that I packed my saddlebags with my groceries and laptop but forgot my knapsack
in the shopping cart. I rode back and there was a Weis Market employee standing
beside it telling me he watched it and no one touched it. I got home and the 2
pounds of turkey thigh was missing and gone. I dont know if anything else is
missing or not. </li><li>At about 5:30pm
I loaded my truck with the HP C7280 printer and someone had drained my battery.
Apparently someone did not want me picking up the paper copy of the 723 page
document that was part of my Complaint to the United Nations Council for Human
Rights or they did not want me to be able to return my printer to BJs Club on
Centerville Road.</li><li>Before I went to the
Lancaster County Courthouse, I had a conversation with Rufus Fulton, former
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Fulton Financial. Rufus retired in 2006 and
is now an acting Board of Director. I have had several conversations with Rufus, but
yesterdays will be the last. Mr. Fulton must understand that when he is in public
and converses with me, I hold him to the same standard that everyone holds me to.
He is an embarrassment to the County of Lancaster and to Fulton Financial. I civilly
and cordially approached Mr. Fulton and pulled a business card from my wallet and
asked him if you would oblige me and look at my website. He interrupted me
before I could tell him what I wanted him to see, and he emphatically told me Sam,
I dont believe any of it. People call me Sam when they want to harass me. They
want me to be reminded that they look at me and remind them of my father. I
responded are telling me that you dont believe that the United States government
produces the artillery and weapons that I mention on my website?. He again
responded with the same I dont believe any of it. I, knowing that most of the
mind control weapons are cited and confirmed in either declassified government
documents or through United States Senate Hearings. I told him that I was going to
hold him accountable and state that for the record, and he said he did not care. I
gave him another chance to recant what he said, and he refused. This is what he
gets for shooting off his mouth; he is just like everybody else in this dam town. And
people want to doubt that I have legitimate claims against Fulton Bank for the
hundreds of thousands of dollars they (Fulton Bank) have extorted from me and my
brother, Tommy.</li><li>I must make
note of all of the people that were around me yesterday at Penn Square over the
lunchtime hour: Fred Kendall, Joyce Michaels (looked like her), Rufus Fulton, Brad
Roda, Mary Gatis, Rock Fitzgerald, Judge Denis Reinaker (Courthouse), Bruce Roth (Courthouse), Robert Hallinger and
his receptionist (Courthouse), Erica Weitzel, Lancaster Planning Commission guy,
blonde attorney?, Jerry Larish, Jim High, Jack Buckwalter, Kevin Cosmore .
Anyone know what all of these people have in common? It seems that before I file
significant exhibits or motions, people come out of the
woodwork. </li></ul><div style="margin-left: 40px;"></div> <hr style="width: 100%; height:
2px;">Tuesday, October 6,
2009 8:42:27 AM <ul><li>Monday, October 5, 2009 the Computer Hackers broke my new HP Photosmart C7280 All-In-On Printer,
that was just purchased a few weeks ago. I now have to return it to
BJ's Club. </li><li>On the same
day the telepathic harassment and pain was one of the worst assaults that I have
had. I was trying to complete the monthly invoices for Advanced Media
Group and the remote viewer was so clever and relentless while I was trying to work
both the electronic calculator and my WORD file at the same time. It was
almost impossible to complete. The same was true of the final edition of the
complaint to the Council for Human Rights of the United
Nations.</li><li>This morning the
Computer Hacker literally locked my cd drive for 2 or more hours while I was trying
to finish the copy for the U.S. Department of State.</li></ul> <hr style="width:
100%; height: 2px;">Saturday,
October 3, 2009 8:34:47 AM <ul style="font-family:
Verdana;"><li>COLLUSION TO COMMIT
EXTORTION BY THE LANCASTER CITY POLICE; THE INSURANCE COMPANIES; THE
PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF INSURANCE; THE MAYOR AND MY FAMILY!
 </li><li>A continuation of the vandalism. Since September 4,
2009 I have had 12 purchases that have had to be returned due to them being
broken or the wrong product. This method does not require criminal trespass
and burglary into my home/office at 1250 Fremont Street. I loose time;
money; and must ship the items back or go back to the respective stores and
get harassed again. </li><li>On Thursday I had spent some $20.00 in postage
returning items that I had purchased on Ebay. Yesterday, Friday, October 2,
2009 I received 3 items in a very suspicious manner from the U.S. Postal
Service. I was taking an afternoon nap when the mail woke me up as it came
through my door. In the mail was a Notice to pick up a parcel from the
Harrisburg Pike Post Office on or after October 3, 2009. Also in the mail was
my renewed Pennsylvania auto registration renewal sticker, which was a few days
late, of course. I went out and put the sticker on my plates and came back in
the house. A few minutes later the door bell rang and a U.S. Postal Carrier
said he had some packages for me. He handed me one and asked for the
Notice back and asked me to sign it. I asked what he was doing, why didn't
he ring the bell when he delivered the mail. He flat out lied and said he
did. I was 8 feet from the ringer, impossible not to hear, sleeping or
not. Anyway he delivered my next (3) items purchased from Ebay.
None of which work. All three have to be refunded. Then this morning
I tried to install the biometric finger print locks for my front door, again a purchase
from Ebay. Now it does not work. Now for the record, I am very
experience with Ebay, both as a seller and a buyer. I was selling on Ebay full-
time a few years ago and had a perfect feedback score, until the perps saw I was
begining to make money. I had the same record with my purchases.</li><li
style="font-weight: bold;">Now, let's review the record concerning the security of
1250 Fremont Street. In the past few years the following has taken
place:</li><ul><li style="font-weight: bold;">I was denied contents insurance by
the Spiziri Insurance group.</li><li style="font-weight: bold;">I was denied a
security system with monitoring by Select Security, owned and operated by Patrick
Egan, of Lancaster, Pennsylvania.</li><li style="font-weight: bold;">I was unable
to purchase a functioning biometric finger print lock-set.</li><li style="font-weight:
bold;">The Lancaster City Police Department refuse to take any complaints of
vandalism or thefts; dating back to 2007.</li><li style="font-weight: bold;">The
insurance company, State Farm, that insures the contents of 1250 Fremont Street
under my mother's property and casualty company refuses to pay.</li><li
style="font-weight: bold;">The Pennsylvania Departmtment of Insurance refuses to
enforce the insurance laws of Pennsylvania regarding the above.</li><li
style="font-weight: bold;">The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) refuses to
meet with me. </li><li style="font-weight: bold;">Lancaster City Mayor Rick
Gray, after more than four (4) meetings refuses to do anything but ask who owns
1252 Fremont Street.</li><li style="font-weight: bold;">Lancaster City Chief of
Police Keith Saddler refused mediation through a process that was I initiated with
the Lancaster Mediation Center.</li><li style="font-weight: bold;">The County of
Lancaster, through a Meeting with Former Administrator Mark Esterbrook also
refused to engage in any Mediation process in December of
2007. </li><li>My Family refused mediation
through the Lancaster Mediation Center during the same time that I filed with the
Lancaster City Police Department. </li></ul><li>The following items
are now considered non-functional and must be returned to the
sellers:</li><ul><li>(2) 16 Megabyte Thumb Drives.</li><li>1 I-Touch Biometric
Finger Print Lockset.</li><li>1 Memory Foam Laptop
Case.</li></ul></ul> <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;">October 31, 2009 12:38:00
AM<ul><li>We are
back to the vandalism; this time it is on purchasing replacements for things that
were either vandalized or stolen before, or for new items. I made several
purchases on Ebay the past few weeks, and just like earlier, most of the items had
to be returned because the arrived in non-working condition. They were
either vandalized by the seller, or by someone who intercepted the package prior to
delivery, or by a neighbor who stole the package from the U.S. Postal Delivery
Person.</li><ul><li>Microsoft Office 2007; the discs would not
load.</li><li>Konica Camcorder; the drivers would not work and the SD Disc did not
work, technically making it impossible to transfer the media files to my
computer.</li><li>Sansa Clip 2 MByte MP3 Player; they changed the add from New to Used
and took me 3 weeks to get a manual for the
device.</li><li>Headset for a Computer; the microphone was taint and scratchy when
using it with my phone system.</li><li>Speakers for my Laptop were either broken or the
computer hackers simulated the noise and could not listen to
music.</li></ul><li><a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 204);" target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/fbi-ic3-complaint-
i0909141752127141-update-september-30-2-2009.pdf" class="RE">The Computer
Hacking is making it almost impossible to get anything done, click here for the
latest rounds of complaints to the Federal Bureau of Investigation IC3
Unit.</a></li><li>The accident of September 4, 2009 when a driver with an expired
registration rear-ended me is another issue where everyone wants to harass and lie;
<a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 204);" target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/state-auto-accident-
of-september-4-2009-documentation-sept-24-2009.pdf" class="RE">click here for
the documents. I reported the accident an hour after it happened to my Insurance
Agent of Record; and the Insurance Company wanted to act like I was trying to
avoid the reporting requirements.</a></li><li>They are again using electromagetic
weapons on my back. I went all week without having to take any medication
for back pain, the last on early Friday evening, then first thing Monday morning I
was back taking medication; and have everyday this
week. </li></ul> <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;">September 22, 2009
5:45:27 AM <ul><li>I have
been experiencing EXTREME lower back pain from Electromagnetic Energy Devices
for the past 4 days and had to make an appointment with Dr. Sullivan for September
22, 2009 at 10:20 am. This is the worst it has been.</li><li style="font-
family: Verdana;">Today, it took me all morning and a call to 911
for the ABBEYVILLE FAMILY MEDICINE STAFF to take my call to make an appointment
due to extreme lower back pain. They kept putting me on hold and leaving me
hang on the phone; 10:25 minutes; 14:47 minutes; 5:37 minutes. That was after I
kept getting a busy signal; making me call 911.</li><li style="font-family:
Verdana;">The computer hacking and intrusions into my computer
are getting so bad that now I just update FBI Complaint No. I0909141752127141
several times a day. The hackers have a way of making my mouse jump when
highlighting and dragging text that would drive you insane.</li><li
style="font-family: Verdana;">Today, September 21, 2009 I
ORDERED one BIOMETRIC THUMB PRINT DOOR LOCK for my front door at 1250
Fremont Street; hopefully you will soon see me without my backpack on my back. I
also CONTRACTED with a third party that backups and encrypts every file on my
new laptop computer in real time mode and stores every file off-site.</li><li
style="font-family: Verdana;">Today, September 21, 2009, I
received an invoice from LANCASTER GENERAL HEALTH for a Balance Due of $29.50
to Abbeyville Family Medicine for an ADJUSTMENT of $36.50 for OFFICE OUTPATIENT
VISIT/ NEW LEVEL III. This is very suspicious given today I made the appointment
for my back pain.</li><li style="font-family: Verdana;">Perps stole a new container of pepper; they love to steal my
food.</li><li style="font-family: Verdana;">I had received
the following items from Ebay that did not work or were
changed:</li><ul><li style="font-family: Verdana;">Microsoft Office 2007</li
USB to IDE Adapter</li><li
style="font-family: Verdana;">MByte Sansa MP3 Player was listed
as new, then changed and received without an owners
manual.</li></ul><li style="font-family: Verdana;">Today,
September 21, 2009 I received a hand written letter from my brother Steve
Caterbone and my Mom requesting that I pay for all utilities and a $43.00 UGI Gas
Bill. However, the letter did not match his handwriting or the telephone
conversation of September 13, 2009. On September 12, 2009 he had requested
that I pay for the UGI gas utility. In response I sent him a letter and on September
20, 2009 sent him $60 via PayPal (Mike Caterbone).</li><li style="font-
family: Verdana;">On Friday, September 18, 2009 I went to Harbor
Freight Tools, Lincoln Highway East, Lancaster to return a Cordless Drill. I had it
sitting in the passenger side floor for a few days and when I picked it up, it was
soaked, the cardboard box was ruined. I took special care to package it just the way
I received it. Some perp, probably the guy named Toby in the 1300 Block of
Fremont Street who used to hang out with William Lefty Plank.</li><li
style="font-family: Verdana;">Then I went to Walmart, about a mile
away on Lincoln Highway East, to get some Dr. Scholls Foot Inserts to help deal
with my back and groin. I have been looking for these kiosks for about 4 weeks.
You stand on the kiosk and it tells you exactly what type of insert to purchase, which
are located on the sides. A few days ago, I finally got online and located the kiosks
at all of the Wall marts. When I stepped on the machine, it would not work. An
employee came out of the Pharmacy and told me it worked earlier in the day, but
they needed to call the sales rep to repair it. I took pictures and recorded the event,
I was again wired with a recording device.</li><li style="font-family:
Verdana;">On Friday, September 18, 2009 I went to the Lancaster
Catholic High School Football Game and wired myself due to being harassed and
stalked all the time. I was ignored and infuriated by my former friends Mike and
Mary Lynn Dipaolo (with Sheryl Crow?) and harassed and berated so bad my Tina
Fulginetti Kirchner that I had to leave before halftime. I solicited the support of
Father Pete Hahn of St. Leo Catholic Church regarding Organized Stalking and
Harassment/Directed Energy Devices and gave him my card.</li><li
style="font-family: Verdana;">After the game I went to the
Beach/House of Pasta on Millersville Pike for a drink and was harassed by the James
Street District Patrolman; whom I already complained several times to Lisa Riggs,
Director of James Street, regarding his stalking and harassing me. Listen to audio
transcript.</li><li style="font-family: Verdana;">On
Saturday, September 19, 2009 I participated in the Conference Call for Freedom
From Harassment and Covert Surveillance (FFCHS). There were 33 members
present. I was also asked to join the committee to solicit a Hollywood/Celebrity
Spokesperson by director Derek Robinson. I also joined there lawsuit against the
Department of Justice.</li><li>On or about Wednesday,
September 16, 2009 I went to Smithgalls Pharmacy to pick up a yard sign for the
Election of Charlie Smithgall for Mayor. Upon leaving, the pastor of the First
Reformed United Church of Christ, who told me he was ex-navy, was again stalking
me. This time he walked a few feet from me carrying a hunting rifle in his arms,
pointed down to the ground. I was not a very happy camper. I told him to stay
away from me, he said Dont worry about it. What fool would do that, I mean,
without putting the gun in a gun case before carrying it around the streets of the
City of Lancaster. He was heading from Mary Street to Lemon Street. The last time
I saw him was in the Lancaster County Sheriffs Department when I was getting
Sheriff Bergman or Deputy Chief Reese to review one of my CI-08-13373 filings, as
per President Judge Farinas ORDER. I guess he was just getting his gun permit. We
have had discussions prior to this about MKULTRA; my father; and the U.S.
Navy. </li></ul> <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;">September 11,
2009 <ul type="disc"><li>My first Doctors
appointment with my new primary care physician, Dr. Denise Cope of Abbeville
Family Medicine on Abbeville Road, Lancaster, Pennsylvania ended up being another
attempt by Lancaster General Hospital to intimidate; harass; extort; and
lie.</li><li>On August 3, 2009 I signed releases
from Mastropietro and Associates Family Practice to Abbeville Family Medicine and
was given 2 choices for primary care physicians; Brian Sullivan, M.D. or Denise N.
Cope, M.D. I selected Denise N. Cope, M.D..</li><li>Abbeville Family Medicine kept stalling the process, even though
they had a yard sign on the property stating Now Accepting New
Patients.</li><li>On September 10, 2009 I called
and made an appointment with Denise N. Cope, M.D. to evaluate my pulled groin
and back problems and to consult on the emergency surgery of July 20,
2009. The customer service person gave me a fixed price of $80.00,
and I accepted.</li><li>On Friday,
September 12, 2009 I showed up at about 3:15 for my 3:20
appointment.</li><ul><li>The switched doctors to
Dr. Brian Sullivan, M.D. and lied and said Dr. Denise Cope was not in the office,
when she suddenly appeared in the waiting area as I was
leaving.</li><li>They tried to charge me $148.00
instead of the $80.00 agreed upon price.</li><li>Two staff members pulled me into an office and tried to berate me
and harass me because I did not answer my cell phone the day before and they
could not leave a message because I have no voice mail on the
account.</li><li>The nurse gave me a false blood
pressure reading.</li><li>Dr. Brian Sullivan, M.D.
tried to again refute the false and fabricated 302 petition of July 19, 2009 and the
reason the Lancaster City Police; the Lancaster General Hospital; the Lancaster
Community-At-Large, and most importantly all of the defendants that I have filed
civil complaints against in civil courts; and of course all of the police departments
that filed false arrests; need so desperately to discredit my allegations and change
the truth.</li><li>Abbeville Family Medicine also
lied about what medical records they do have.</li><li>Both Dr. Brian Sullivan, M.D. and Dr. Denise Cope, M.D. as well as
the entire staff have violated the Hippocratic oath.</li><li>Then after I get home, there is a message from Amy telling me she
adjusted the bill for services.</li></ul><li>Again,
some perp soaked the passenger side floor of my 1991 Dodge Dakota with
water. Now immediately following the imprisonment of William
Lefty Plank on June 15, 2009 and for about the next month or so, even during
heavy rains, there was never any sign of water on the floor mats. Then about
3 weeks ago, it started again.</li><li>The
USB to IDE cable and power supply that I bought from Ebay several weeks ago, does
not work after first trying it a few minutes ago.</li><li>Computer hackers locked me out of my facsimile account and I
again was not able to update my website. Another Complaint to the
FBI IC3 Complaint No. I0909110558417822.</li><li>Microsoft reset my email account after hackers closed my account
for 2 days.</li></ul></div><hr style="width: 100%; height:
2px;">September 10,
2009<ul><li>Strong
Elecromagnetic Devices past several days.</li><li>Vandalized Mr. Coffee automatic coffee maker, does not work
anymore.</li><li>Stolen Identity with email
account <a
href="mailto:Caterbone@live.com">Caterbone@live.com</a></sp
an>; Microsoft closed account for 2 days due to fabricated violation with terms
and conditions.</li><li>Filed complaint with the FBI
Cyber Crime Unit Complaint ID No. I090100045224132. The following was
reported:</li> <ul><li><div align="justify">Description of the Incident - Describe in your own words
how you have been victimized. September 10, 2009 My computer and online
accounts have been hacked and my identity stolen for many years now. I have been
reporting this crime to every available law enforcement agency within my
jurisdiction. My most recent incident includes the closing of my email account
without merit; most likely because persons access and use my account without my
knowledge or consent. The email account is scaterbone@live.com. Now,
my advancedmediagroup@yahoo.com refuses to send out any email
accounts. I would advise you to
please go to www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com and read the Executive
Summary on the Welcome page for more information. I don't believe this form will
allow me enough space. The other problem is
that the Lancaster City Police Department; the Lancaster County District Attorney
Office; and the FBI Office in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania all refuse to
investigate. I would accept a meeting with the U.S. Department of State to
consider negotiations for conditions to move outside the domestic United States or
to another country of my choosing if my situation is too difficult for you to
investigate, or if the rule of law intimidates you in any
way.</div></li></ul></ul><hr>September 7, 2009 <div style="text-align:
justify;"><ul><li>My Braun 4615 Electric
Razor</li><li>My Mr. Coffee Coffee MakerMy New Compaq Presario CQ60-421NR</li><li>I
purchased my new Compaq Presario CQ60-421NR on August 28, 2009 from Office
Max that ran a sale of $150.00 of the retail price of $550.00. I must say I am
impressed with the machine, forgetting about all the things that dont work on my
machine. I have been keeping a log of the items that did not function or were just
not working properly from the beginning. Of course, the computer hackers threw
themselves in the middle of this. As it stands now, the computer hackers do not like
me using a Word processor. First of all, on September 28, 2009 I the salesman sold
me Microsoft Office Student Home Office 2007 version for $99.00 and told me that
no older versions of Microsoft Office would work with the Microsoft Vista operating
system. He also told me that my documents that I created with Microsoft Office
2007 would not be backward compatible with other version of Microsoft Office. He
failed to recognize my expertise with PC computers. You only need use the Save As
funcion and select how far back you want your documents to be compatible. I own
Microsoft Office 2000, with a valid registration number. I found out that he lied to
me and the next day returned the Microsoft Office 2007. The following is my log of
flaws and functions that did not work, and it is a shame because for the price, I am
very impressed. I guess Ill have to hope they
have more in stock:August 28, 2009 - The directories using Microsoft
Explorer were all mixed up and would not sort. The Search function did not
work.</li></ul></div><div style="margin-left: 80px;"><ol><li
style="font-family: Verdana;">August 29,
2009 - The computer started with the following No Bootable Disc.. for no reason.
The computer has been always shut down using the Microsoft Logo. Also, I could not
produce a DVD of data. The whole machine froze and had to be
rebooted.</li><li style="font-family: Verdana;">August 30, 2009 - Photos
are skipped when browsing using Microsoft Photo Gallery. Also the videos would not
operate in my Emergency Injunction CD-ROM.</li><li style="font-family:
Verdana;">August 31, 2009 - Windows Explorer kept changing, and would not
operate normally.</li><li style="font-family: Verdana;">September 2, 2009 - The
CD-ROM writer kept changing menus and would always freeze. While trying to make
a copy of Remote Viewing CD Exhibit for Court Case No. CI-08-13373 with Russell
Targ, Remote Viewer, the CD-ROM would make a noise and not work.</li><li
style="font-family: Verdana;">September 4, 2009 - I had wasted at least six or
seven CD-ROMs trying to make copies of Remote Viewing CD Exhibit for Court
Case No. CI-08-13373 with Russell Targ, Remote Viewer.</li><li style="font-family:
Verdana;">September 5, 2009 - All of the Word Processing programs stopped
working; Microsoft Office 2007; Microsoft Office 2000, and Wordpad. Photos are
available.</li><li style="font-family: Verdana;">And everyone wonders why I had
to withdraw all of my Federal lawsuits.</li></ol></div> <hr style="width: 100%; height:
2px;">September6,
Verdana;">There are several new incidents
since September 2, 2009 to report. <ul><li>On Friday, September 4, 2009 I spent about an hour
with a technician/salesman from Select Security, a company owned and operated by
Lancaster Township resident Patrick Egan, for a proposal and estimate on a security
and monitoring system for my home/office at 1250 Fremont Street. We agreed on a
price and payment schedule and he gave me an installation date of Wednesday,
September 9, 2009. He left the meeting to meet with Patrick Egan and was
supposed to email me an electronic version of the hardware; and payment
schedule. He later emailed me and said Hey Stan, Select Security is unable to
assist you with your security needs. Thanks, Matt Self, Sales and Marketing
Coordinator, Select Security, 241 N. Plum Street, Lancaster, PA 17602, Direct: (717)
481-6307 * Fax: (717) 481-7574 .</li><li>September 4, 2009 during First Friday in Downtown Lancaster I (1991
Dodge Dakota 4WD Pickup Truck) was rear ended with malice by two Spanish
persons driving a 1991 Chevrolet Blazer, Burgundy SW. Damage to my rear bumper.
I was smart enough to stay in the exact position and made certain the assailants did
the same. I took crime scene photos that proved the car was not legally registered
at the time of the incident and the tires were aligned toward my truck, proving that
they came across from the inner lane on King Street as I was backing into a parking
spot. Also, it is my testimony that the female was driving and first got out of her car
yelling at me and accusing me of being drunk and a crack head. I had just come
from Sheetz on Manheim Pike; Lancaster Bicycle Shop on Manheim Pike; Weis
Markets; Home Depot; and the Office Max, all of Red Rose Commons, after leaving
my home/office. I have time stamped receipts. I was at no other place during the
entire day. The incident occurred at approximately 8:15pm with Lancaster City
Police Officer Mendez, Badge No. 92. The assailants names are George Maldonado
of 1202 Clay Road, #1, Lititz, Pennsylvania, 17543 and Kristin Wilson, 220
Kinseyville Road, Nottingham, PA 19362. They have Allstate Insurance, Policy No.
928473088. I have 10 crime scene photos. The Assign. No. is 004463. Two James
Street Investment District Bike Patrol Persons also harassed me, both males that I
did not recognized. As soon as the Lancaster City Police responded I made sure he
called the Lancaster City Safety Coalition to see if a video was
available.</li><li>My Zenith SM274481195 36 Television/Stereo was
vandalized yesterday, September 5, 2009 and no longer works at all. The power no
longer comes on.</li><li>After sealing my
patio with a brown tarp, the corner closest to Dawn Sutton of 1248 Fremont Street
was totally undone by vandals, yesterday or last night, September 5,
2009.</li><li>I was harassed by Dawn Sutton and chased off of my
patio roof while painting yesterday, September 5, 2009 then she followed and
stalked me at the CVS Store, Manor Shopping Center about an hour
later.</li><li>Considering that about a month ago they vandalized
and broke my Sharp RV-DV550U Digital VHS/DVD Recorder and my Panasonic RF-
PV275 27.5 Flat Screen DVD/VHS Television Set, just about every piece of
electronics has now been vandalized in my home, including 2 laptop computers, 1
desktop computer, and 2 inkjet printers. <div align="justify"> <hr></div></li></ul>September 2,
2009 <ul><li>On September 2,
2009 we applied for security through Select Security of Plum Street, Lancaster,
Pennsylvania and are awaiting a response. Choice Security and Yarnell Security have
already been excluded from any type of inquiry due to fraud and or harassment in
the past regarding the installation and monitoring of a home security system at 220
Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, Pennsylvania. No one better cause a problem in our
negotiations for a home security system for our home/office at 1250 Fremont Street,
Lancaster, Pennsylvania. </li><li>This report does not cover all incidents, but was compiled mainly due to
the surge in vandalism over the past week or so.</li><li>Since the end of
June, 2009 we have been dictating memos on a micro cassette recorder and
securing them offsite. This new techniques was administered mainly as the result of
the Pain Assault initiated on July 8, 2009 and executed in part by the Lancaster
General Hospital, the Lancaster Regional Medical Center, the Lancaster City Police,
and Mastropietro and Associates Family Practice.</li><li>The memos are
of daily incidents of vandalism; harassment; stalking; and torture by directed energy
devices and weapons and or electromagnetic microwave technology. (See Executive
Summary - Federal Whistleblower and Targeted Individual of U.S. Sponsored Mind
Control dated July 28, 2009) <hr></li></ul>September 3, 2009 Update on Current and Recent Vandalism/Theft
Reports: <ul><li>September 2,
2009 broke gear cable on bike in order to cause accident by having cable wrap
around chain while riding. Vandalism happened in front of Fulton Bank, Manor
Shopping Center, where bike was parked. Also bent front reflector.September 1, 2009 broke outside light under patio and left the metal in
the socket so that you have to remove without being able to unscrew the actual
light bulb.</li><li>Stole bird feed from backyard bird feeder, twice in
last week and a half.</li><li>Drain hot tub of
water on a continuous basis.</li><li>On August 27th
or 28th soaked passenger floor of 1991 Dodge Pick-up Truck. This used to be done
every time it rained, however, it stopped on or about June 15, 2009 when William
Lefty Richard Plank was committed to Lancaster County Prison.Hacked new Compaq Presario Laptop.</li><li>On August 28,
2009 hacked the edit page of Advanced Media Group website,
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com .</li><li>ust about every
home improvement done over the last several days has been sabotaged after
completion, or they have done everything to prevent me from making purchases
required for the projects. Saturday, August 29, 2009 9:50:00 AM <ul><li>(4) Four Manheim Township Merchants Commit Theft
By Deception on August 26th, August 27th, and August 28th of 2009.August 26, 2009 - Lens Crafters, Park City Mall, Manheim Township,
Pennsylvania refused to provide Eye Examination for Prescription Glasses
and/or Prescription Glasses. </li><li>August 27, 2009
- Kohls Department Store, Park City Mall, Manheim Township, Pennsylvania switched
a pair of Asics Sneakers Size 9 to Avia Size 11 at the checkout
counter. <span style="font-family:
- Eyemart Express Store No. 71, Park City Mall, Manheim Township,
Pennsylvania, Charged $288.86 for (2) Pair of eyeglasses that were not right and
could not be used, $288.86 was voided that day, however no credit was issued on
bank statement as of yet. <span style="font-family:
- Cartridge World, of 1937-B Fruitville Pike, Manheim Township, Pennsylvania,
charged $35.76 for (2) Lexmark Ink Cartridges that were empty. The black
printed 3 pages before running out of ink and the color cartridge registered as "Low
Ink" upon installation. August 25, 2009 to August 29, 2009 Other Incidents And Surges Of Harassment; Vandalism; And
Electromagnetic and Telepathic Torture of last few days (August 25, 2009 to August
29, 2009) :<ul><li>Today, August
29, 2009 Six (6) of Water drained from hot tub.</li><li>Today, August
29, 2009 Passenger Side Floor Flooded with Water.</li><li>Brand
New Compaq Presario CQ60-421NR Does Not Operate Without Major
Problems.</li><li>Office Max Sold Computer and Software on
Misinformation regarding Microsoft Office, Which Had to be Returned.Today, August 29, 2009 Went to the Manheim Township Police Station to
Report Thefts by Deception and got Harassed by Officer Taking Report; He Tried To
Provoke Me.</li><li>Lancaster Solid Waste Management Would Not
Provide Correct Information for Recycling Yard Waste.Constantly Harassed By Neighbors, Especially the Bloods and Crypts
or CrackHeads. Friday, August 14, 10:44:25 AM <ul><li>NEW PAIN ASSAULT STARTED THIS WEEK AUGUST 10,
2009 - BACK ACHES!</li><li>Since the Pain
Assault in my mouth is now over, they started going back to the old Directed Energy
Device Weapons with Back, Neck, and Headaches.</li><li>August 11, 2009 1:15:38PM I had someone at my window last night, sounded like they were trying to
open screen window. Called 911 and made complaints about 2 other
incidents for yesterday, August 10, 2009 ( dead battery at UPS Store, Stone Mill
Plaza and 8 inches of water taken out of hot tub). Lancaster County Wide and Lancaster City Police forget that I have a
Police Band Radio. I taped Lancaster County Wide Communications lie to the
Lancaster Police and said that I hung up, then the Lancaster City Police said "that is
the response I thought, or something like that.</li><li>Then, a
sometime later, Lancaster City Police scare the hell out of me shining a flashlight in
my back kitchen door and window. </li><li>Why didn't the
Lancaster City Police ring the door bell and come to the front door????
</li><li>Thankfully for my micro
cassette tape recorder, gotcha again!</li><li>The following
was broken and vandalized in the past week (July 25, 2009 to August 3, 2009): one
gas powered week whacker; one 27" Panasonic TV (VCR will no longer work); one
Sharp DVD VCR Recorder (VCR will no longer work); my saddle bag for my
briefcase.</li><li>I also in recent weeks added the following to
CATERBONE v. Duke Street Business Center CI-08-13373 President Obama; Attorney
General Eric Holder; and Chief of Lancaster City Police Keith Sadler; among
others. I will be claiming racial and ethnic discrimination in that
complaint. <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"></li></ul>August 7, 2009 10:21:59
 <ul><li>Lancaster General Hospital (LGH)Tried to Get a Court Order under the
302 Commitment to have Advanced Media Group's website taken
down:</li><li>Dr. Daniel McIntyre stated on the medical file the
following as part of his notes: "... Patient has a long history of delusional thoughts
secondary to his Bipolar disorder. He apparently has a website that provides him an
avenue to express his grandiose thoughts and delusions. This patient is clearly in
need of psychiatric help. He also needs medical attention to the dental abscess he
currently is suffering with. I do not feel the patient is safe for outpatient follow up. I
have arranged for Conestoga Oral surgery to admit the patient with a 302 petition
in place. Psychiatry to see patient in consultation." Transcribed on Mon Jul 20, 2009
12:57 AM </li></ul> <hr style="width:
100%; height: 2px;">Monday, August 3, 2009 12:49:05 PM <div style="margin-left: 40px;"><ul><li>Dr. Denise Cope of Family Practice Associates of Lancaster on Abbeville
Road, Lancaster, better not refuse me as a new patient as my primary care
physician. Today, August 3, 2009, I submitted my forms to transfer to that practice
and the receptionist tried to tell me that she needs to review my medical file from
Mastropietro Associates first. This is not what I was told on July 29, 2009 when I first
picked up the paperwork to switch primary care physicians.Today, August 3, 2009 in my appointment with Dr. Henrichsen of
Conestoga Oral Surgeons, he said it will be a month or more until my mouth opens
wider. I am still restricted to an opening of only 1/2 inch. The following was broken and vandalized in the past week (July 25, 2009
to August 3, 2009): one gas powered week whacker; one 27" Panasonic TV (VCR will
no longer work); one Sharp DVD VCR Recorder (VCR will no longer work); my saddle
bag for my briefcase.</li><li>I also in recent
weeks added the following to CATERBONE v. Duke Street Business Center CI-08-
13373 President Obama; Attorney General Eric Holder; and Chief of Lancaster City
Police Keith Sadler; among others. I will be claiming racial and ethnic discrimination
in that complaint. </li><li>The Project Hope
Tommy Caterbone Memorial Golf Tournament that was held at Crossgates Golf
Course yesterday, Saturday, August 1, 2009 ended in disaster. I attended two times,
once in the afternoon and once in the evening. Did not see anyone I recognized on
the Golf Course, and there was no dinner at 6:00 pm, as in the past 13 years. Jimmy
Karpathios; his wife; Tina Albright; Lizzy Pflumm; Pami Pflumm; Dave Pflumm; Bill
Pflumm; Tina Dougherty; Dakota Royer; Tina Royer; James Doran; all were there
around the pavilion, lying to me about the golf tournament.Lizzy Pflumm is now a confirmed Professional Stalker and Harasser. What
the hell, did the Pflumm's take over Project Hope. I did see a prize table with tee
shirts and golf shirts, which of course I was able to walk away with, with permission
from someone. </li><li>First a worker
from Crossgates told me in the afternoon that dinner was at 5:30, then in the
evening, 2 workers said it was served at 3:00 pm.
 </li></ul></div><div style="margin-left: 40px;"><hr style="width:
100%; height: 2px;"> </div>You people just don't quite Saturday, August 1,
2009 <div style="margin-left:
40px;"><ul><li>Staples of Golden Triangle
Shopping Center refused on 2 occasions to print 2 brochures from Freedom From
Covert Harassment and Surveillance Organization (www.freedomfchs.com). One on
Organized Stalking and Harassment and One on Directed Energy Devices. On
Wednesday July 29, 2009 it was Brett ... and on Friday July 31, 2009 it was a white
female. They are already a named party as a defendant on CI-08-13373 in the
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.</li><li>Wednesday
afternoon, July 28, 2009, Steve Midciff, CEO of Lancaster Regional Medical Center
agreed to a meeting to discuss their conduct. The meeting was scheduled for
Thursday, July 29, 2009 at 10:00am. </li><li>Steve Midciff,
the CEO of Lancaster Regional Medical Center and Dr. Anthony Mastropietro, my
former Primary Care Physician, ambushed me and assaulted me in another attempt
to 302 me. I had to leave after about one minute in his office. Could not believe it.
Just like Lori Austin of Millersville University and the former head of LETA had done
to me the past few months.</li><li>Then today, July 30, 2009
I had a medical appointment with Dr. Rodriquez of Mastropietro Associates for a 2nd
opinion of my jaw, which still only opens 1/2" after emergency surgery. Again, Dr.
Mastropietro (via telephone) and his office manager assaulted me on the telephone,
he said "do you remember meeting with me yesterday?". The would not let me
meet with Dr. Rodriquez. Did they harm me three times, one by making me visit the
Emergency Room 4 times before they would treat me; then did they do something
wrong at surgery?; and now they are trying to cover up all the mistakes with yet
another 302 petition. These people need some serious help.I immediately went to a Family Practice on Abbeville Road and started
the process of switching my primary care physician. Saturday, July 25, 2009 I am recuperating from surgery, they did put me
under general anesthesia. I still am not able to open my jaw very wide, and must
crumble my food. </li></ul></div>________________________________________ LGH Pain
Assualt July 24, 2009 <ul><li>On Thursday evening, July 23, 2009 another tooth
began hurting me, and they again began hitting me with Directed Energy Devices
with Harassment.</li><li>For the record,
on Sunday evening at no time did the Lancaster City Police or Lancaster General
Hospital ever present me with a 302 Warrant at my home or in the Lancaster
General Hospital.</li><li>Sunday evening,
July 19, 2009; LANCASTER CITY POLICE HANDCUFF ME IN MY HOME, TAKE ME AND
ONLY SHIRT, SHOES, PANTS, WALLET TO LGH AT 9:20PM. Some of incident I have recorded of Lancaster City Police in my
home. </li><li>Admitted to
Behavioral Medicine in Emergency Room at Lancaster General Hospital about
9:45pm Sunday Evening, July 19, 2009. </li><li>Three hours
later taken to Intermediate Intensive Care Unit Room Number
6003. </li><li>Monday, July 20, 2009 emergency surgery done on
mouth, including infection that reached into my blood stream and
system. </li><li>Operation a
success, thanks to Dr. Henrichsen, MD of Conestoga Oral Surgeons and the LGH
Intensive Care Unit/Operating Room Team. Interviewed by Two (2) LGH Psychiatrists
who refused to sign into 302 Petition Efforts by LANCASTER CITY POLICE
DEPARTMENT. </li><li>DISCHARGED
FROM LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL ON JULY 22, 2009.See Symptoms of the United Nations Petition in the FFCHS, Freedom
From Covert Harassment and Surveillance Document. Harassment by Lancaster General Hospital Doctors and Nurses. Dr. Vito
DiCarmillo and Company. </li><li>Possibly Given
Wrong Medication. </li><li>Left with Little
Mobility in Jaw. Cannot Eat Most Foods. </li></ul> <hr
style="width: 100%; height: 2px;">July 17, 2009 <ul><li>Cavity; Electromagnetic Weapons; Poison; or a combination of the three!
</li><li>Dr. Black, the Dentist from Willow Street, refused me as a patient
yesterday, July 15, 2009. Was a patient since 1994. Since January I have been refused treatment by a dentist from Southeast
Clinic, Lancaster City, New Holland Dental and Dr. West, and now Dr. Black and
Associates of Willow Street. </li><li>Pharmacist (Mr.
Jacobs) at CVS, Manor Shopping Center advised me to see an Endocrinologist,
yesterday, while harassing me. </li><li>Pharmacist at
Weis Markets, Amy Brent, was harassing, yesterday, July 15,
2009. </li><li>My mobility in my jaw went from 1" to 1/2", as of
today, July 16, 2009. </li></ul> <hr style="width: 100%; height:
2px;">July 15,
2009 <ul><li>Pain is not
subsiding, although, with the aid of Momentum Back Relievers, I have been able to
reduce swelling in face. </li><li>I must go back
to another Emergency Room again today, the 8th day of this PAIN
ASSAULT. </li><li>I CAN NO LONG
EAT SOLID FOODS!! WHEN WILL I BE ABLE TO EAT AGAIN!!!!
 </li></ul> <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;">July 13,
2009 <ul><li>WILL ANYONE
PLEASE HELP ME? </li><li>Do Not Have
Access to Computers/Internet or Time To Provide More
Detail. </li></ul>
NEW DOCUMENT LIBRARY
Thursday, October 29, 2009
11:03:48 AMPLEASE ALLOW
A FEW MINUTES FOR LARGER FILES TO DOWNLOAD. (Click on Blue
Letters.)<ol><li style="font-family: Verdana;">October 29, 2009</li><li style="font-family:
Verdana;"><a style="font-weight: bold;
color: rgb(0, 0, 102);" target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/u-s-preliminary-
emergency-injunction-october-28-2009.pdf" class="RE"> Preliminary Emergency
Injunction Filed in U.S. District Court for Eastern Pennsylvania, October 28,
2009</a></li><li style="font-family: Verdana;"><a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 153);" target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/fbi-ic3-cyber-
crimes-complaint-id-i0909141752127141-october-28-2009.pdf" class="RE">FBI IC3
Cyber-Crimes Complaint No. 10909141752127141 Updated October 28,
2009</a> </li><li style="font-
family: Verdana;"><a style="font-
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/audio-manheim-
twp-police-dept-re-assault-by-driver-october-24-2009.mp3" class="RE">Audio -
Meeting at Manhiem Township Police Headquarters re Assault by Driver, October 24,
2009</a></li><li style="font-family: Verdana; color: rgb(0, 0,
153);"><a
target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/fulton-bank-
receptacle-october-22-2009.mp3" class="RE">Audio - At Fulton Bank re Turning off
Receptacle in Safety Deposit Box Booth, October 22, 2009 Click here anyway, Fulton
Bank hacker won't allow color to chang to blue. </a></li><a
target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/fulton-bank-
receptacle-october-22-2009.mp3" class="RE"></a><li style="font-family:
Verdana;"> </li><li style="font-
family: Verdana;">October 25,
2009</li><li style="font-family: Verdana; color: rgb(0, 0, 204);"><a
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/psycho-electro-
weapons-effects-on-human-body-october-23-2009.pdf" class="RE">Psycho-Electro
Weapons Effects on Human Body October 23, 2009</a></li><li style="font-family:
Verdana; color: rgb(0, 0, 204);"><a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 204);"
target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/what-all-americans-
should-know-about-this-domestic-covert-spy-operation-october-23-2009.pdf"
class="RE">What All Americans Should Know About This Domestic Covert Spy
Operation October 23, 2009</a></li><li style="font-family: Verdana; color: rgb(0,
0, 204);"><a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 204);" target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/ffchs-
electromagnetic-weapons-brochure.pdf" class="RE">FFCHS Electromagnetic
Weapons Brochure</a></li><li style="font-family: Verdana; color: rgb(0, 0,
204);"><a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 204);" target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/ffchs-organized-
stalking-brochure.pdf" class="RE">FFCHS Organized Stalking Brochure</a></li><li
style="font-family: Verdana; color: rgb(0, 0, 204);"><a style="font-weight: bold;
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/federal-rules-of-
civil-procedure-rule-65-preliminary-injunction.pdf" class="RE">Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure Rule 65 Preliminary Injunction</a></li><li style="font-family: Verdana;
color: rgb(0, 0, 204);"><a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 204);"
target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/original-social-
security-application-36321693-part-1-review-april-8-2009.pdf" class="RE">Original
Social Security Application 36321693 Part 1 Review April 8, 2009</a></li><li
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/u-s-postal-deliver-
confirmation-for-dept-of-state-stolen-return-receipt-october-21-2009.pdf"
class="RE">U.S. Postal Deliver Confirmation for Dept. of State Stolen Return Receipt
October 21, 2009</a></li><li style="font-family: Verdana; color: rgb(0, 0,
crimes-complaint-id-i0909141752127141-october-22-2009.pdf" class="RE">FBI IC3
Cyber Crimes Complaint ID I0909141752127141 October 22, 2009</a></li><li
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/private-criminal-
complaint-webpage-october-19-2009.pdf" class="RE">PRIVATE CRIMINAL
COMPLAINT Webpage October 19, 2009</a></li><li style="font-family: Verdana;
target="_blank" href="http://advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com/2008/05/09/city-
of-lancaster-aims-at-cover-up/audio-lancaster-city-police-respond-to-stolen-sears-
invoice-october-22-2009/" class="RE">Audio Lancaster City Police respond to
Stolen Sears Invoice October 22, 2009</a></li><li style="font-family: Verdana;
target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/email-to-lgh-
attorneys-mattson-and-brown-re-pain-medication-fabrications-october-14-2009.pdf"
class="RE">Email to LGH Attorneys Mattson and Brown re Pain Medication
Fabrications October 14, 2009</a></li><li style="font-family: Verdana; color:
rgb(0, 0, 204);"><a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 204);" target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com/2008/05/09/city-of-lancaster-
aims-at-cover-up/audio-call-to-senate-judiciary-committee-re-mind-control-october-
2-2009/" class="RE">Audio Call to Senate Judiciary Committee re Mind Control
October 2, 2009</a></li><li style="font-family: Verdana; color: rgb(0, 0,
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/audio-meeting-with-
lancaster-city-police-re-complaint-of-internet-down-october-15-2009.mp3"
class="RE">Audio Meeting with Lancaster City Police re Complaint of Internet
Down October 15, 2009 </a> <a
target="_blank"
group-pro-se-billings-to-august-31-2007.pdf" class="RE"></a></li><li style="font-family: Verdana; color: rgb(0,
0, 204);">October 12,
2009 <a target="_blank"
0, 204);"><a style="font-weight: bold;
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/timeline-of-secret-u-
s-government-sponsored-mind-control-projects-october-12-2009.pdf"
class="RE">Timeline of U.S. Sponsored Government Mind Control.</a> <a target="_blank"
0, 204);"><a target="_blank"
0, 204);">Advanced Media Group Pro Se Billings to August 31, 2007 (September
2007 to Present In Progress). </a></li><li style="font-family:
Verdana;"><a style="color: rgb(0, 0, 204);"
target="_blank"
group-accounts-receivables-october-1-2009.pdf" class="RE">Advanced Media
Group Accounts Receivables October 1, 2009</a></li><li style="font-
family: Verdana;"><a style="color: rgb(0, 0,
group-amended-schedule-b-accounts-receivables-may-11-2009.pdf"
class="RE">Advanced Media Group Amended Schedule B Accounts Receivables
May 11, 2009.</a> </li><li style="font-family:
2009 </li><li style="font-
family: Verdana; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 204);"><a style="color: rgb(0, 0,
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/stan-j-caterbone-u-
s-sponsored-mind-control-and-the-roman-catholic-church-october-10-2009.pdf"
class="RE">Stan J. Caterbone, U.S. Sponsored Mind Control Experimentation, and
the Roman Catholic Church.</a> </li><li style="font-family: Verdana; font-
weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 204);"><a style="color: rgb(0, 0, 204);"
target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/center-for-
constitutional-rights-brochure-october-9-2009.pdf" class="RE">Center for
Constitutional Rights Brochure, October 9, 2009.</a> </li><li style="font-
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/technology-for-
better-or-worse-haarp-and-mind-control-october-8-2009.pdf"
class="RE">"Technology For Better or Worse" re HAARP and Mind Control; Jamaican
Observer, October 9, 2009.</a> </li><li style="font-family:
family: Verdana;"><a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 204);"
target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/letter-to-united-
nations-council-for-human-rights-october-4-2009.pdf" class="RE">Letter and
Complaint of Human Rights Violations to the United Nations Council for Human
Rights.</a> 
<a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 204);" target="_blank"
href="http://drop.io/jgapfrq/asset/cia-torture-investigations-eit-program-sere-and-u-
s-sponsored-mind-control-october-2-2009-pdf?ref=yahoo" class="RE">(Click Here
for 727 Page Report by Advanced Media Group)</a></li><li style="font-family: Verdana;"> <a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0,
crimes-complaint-id-i0909141752127141-october-6-2009.pdf" class="RE">Latest
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) IC3 Cyber Crimes Complaint to October 6,
2009.</a></li><a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 204);" target="_blank"
crimes-complaint-id-i0909141752127141-october-6-2009.pdf" class="RE"></a><li
style="font-family: Verdana;"> </li><li style="font-family: Verdana;">October 3, 2009 </li><li style="font-family: Verdana;"><a style="font-weight: bold;
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/raw-evidence-of-
mind-control-for-sammy-and-dad-reduced-down-to-10-pages-october-3-2009.pdf"
class="RE">10 Pages of Raw Data of Evidence of Mind Control for Samuel P.
Caterbone, Father and Samuel A. Caterbone, Brother.</a> </li><li style="font-
target="_blank" href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/is-
sheryl-crow-another-candy-jones-october-2-2009.pdf" class="RE">Is Sheryl Crow
another Candy Jones? A Victim of Mind Control.</a> </li><li style="font-family: Verdana;"><a style="font-
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/ffchs-conference-
call-newsletters-from-may-2-2009-to-september-25-2009.pdf" class="RE">Freedom
From Covert Harassment and Surveillance FFCHS Newsletters From May 2 to
September 25, 2009.</a> </li><li style="font-family: Verdana;"> </li><li style="font-family: Verdana;">October 2, 2009 </li><li style="font-
family: Verdana;"><a style="color: rgb(0, 0, 204); font-weight: bold;"
target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/letter-from-citizens-
commission-on-human-rights-international-re-psychiatric-abuses-september-26-
2009.pdf" class="RE">Letter from Citizens Commission for Human Rights
International (CCHR) Confirming Psychiatric Abuses</a>. </li><li style="font-family: Verdana;"><a style="font-weight: bold;
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/emails-re-outreach-
committee-of-ffchs-and-press-release-september-31-2009.pdf"
class="RE">Selection by Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance
Organization to Outreach Committee.</a></li><li style="font-family: Verdana;"><a style="font-weight: bold;
color: rgb(0, 0, 204);" target="_blank" href="http://drop.io/jgapfrq/asset/cia-torture-
investigations-eit-program-sere-and-u-s-sponsored-mind-control-october-2-2009-
pdf?ref=yahoo" class="RE">The CIA Torture Investigations - EIT Program - SERE -
and U.S. Sponsored Mind Control. 29 Mbytes.</a></li><a target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/cia-torture-
investigations-eit-program-sere-and-u-s-sponsored-mind-control-october-2-
2009.pdf" class="RE"></a><li style="font-family: Verdana; font-weight: bold; color:
rgb(0, 0, 204);"><a target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/smoking-gun-on-
cia-torture-conspiracy-human-experimentation-central-to-eit-program-sept-27-
2009.pdf" class="RE">Smoking Gun on CIA
Torture Conspiracy? Human Experimentation Central to EIT Program.
</a></li><li style="font-family: Verdana;"><a style="font-weight: bold; color:
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/exclusive-cia-
experiments-on-u-s-soldiers-linked-to-torture-program-september-9-2009.pdf"
class="RE">EXCLUSIVE: CIA Experiments on U.S. Soldiers Linked to Torture
Program.</a> </li><li style="font-family: Verdana;"> </li><li
style="font-family: Verdana;">October 1,
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/duke-street-
business-center-08-13373-case-file-september-30-2009.pdf" class="RE">Updated
Case File for ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP v. Duke Street Business Center; CI-08-
13373.</a> </li><li style="font-family: Verdana; font-weight: bold; color:
rgb(0, 0, 204);"><a style="color: rgb(0, 0, 255);" target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/fbi-ic3-complaint-
i0909141752127141-update-september-30-2-2009.pdf" class="RE">Updated
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) IC3 Computer Hacking
Complaint.</a> </li><li style="font-family: Verdana; font-weight: bold; color:
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/website-version-of-
escaping-the-unix-tar-pit-authored-in-january-of-1991.pdf" class="RE">Website
version of "Escaping the Unix Tar Pit" authored in January of 1991 for DISC
Magazine.</a> </li><li style="font-family: Verdana; font-weight: bold; color:
aims-at-cover-up/yahoo-board-posts-for-advancedmediagroup-jul-2005-to-jan-2008-
september-26-2009/" class="RE">Word File of all posts for Fulton Bank (FULT on
NASDAQ) from 2005 to Present.</a> </li><li style="font-family: Verdana; font-
target="_blank"
group-website-as-of-september-28-2009.pdf" class="RE">PDF File of the Advanced
Media Group Website; this site at
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com</a>. </li><li style="font-family: Verdana;"><a style="font-
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/state-auto-accident-
of-september-4-2009-documentation-sept-24-2009.pdf" class="RE">Accident of
September 4, 2009 Documentation.</a> </li><li style="font-family:
family: Verdana;">September 24,
target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/haarp-the-united-
states-government-and-advanced-media-group-september-23-20092.pdf"
class="RE">Updated Version - HAARP, The United States
Government, The Advanced Media Group, and U.S. Sponsored Mind
Control.</a></li><li style="font-family: Verdana;">The following is a response
(September 26, 2009) to an email from the Executive Director of the <a
style="font-weight: bold;" target="_blank" href="www.freedomfchs.com"
class="RE">Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance Organization or
FFCHS.</a> <div style="text-align: justify;">"Thanks, Derrick. I just received
this yesterday. I at least got a confirmation on the psychiatric abuses, but they are
not taking any action now. I hope they are collecting data on other victims of mind
control in an effort to take some sort of action later. I just completed this
document. <a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 204);"
target="_blank"
class="RE">Updated Version - HAARP, The United States Government, The
Advanced Media Group, and U.S. Sponsored Mind Control</a> It identifies the
relationship among all of the players involved in the ISC scandal and how mind
control may have been involved. You'll notice my transcript with the Pennsylvania
Securities Commission and how they covered me up. If you follow Joe Tate's career,
you have to wonder about Dick Cheney. This gets real interesting with my Father. He
was U.S. Navy, Bobby Ray Inman was U.S. Navy, Jim Guerin was U.S. Navy and of
course George H.W. Bush was U.S. Navy. Now, the dates of my Father's documents
regarding the experiments he talks about, you get to the NSA, the U.S. Navy
Intelligence, and Bobby Ray Inman, former director of NSA. ISC's first major project
was with the NSA. My father may have been working with one of the earlier
experiments of synthetic telepathy. I didn't realize that the ISC Scandel
was one of the reasons that Bobby Ray Inman withdrew as Bill Clinton's nomination
for Secretary of Defense in 1993; which means that Bill Clinton had to have known
about ISC. My Father's passport is another story. He had to have been a
Covert Courier, or he was doing other intelligence work. The HAARP installation in
Puerto Rico is also interesting. I am getting closer to identifying this whole Mind
Control issue and Lancaster's role. Here is another caveat, Rufus Fulton, former CEO
and Chairman of Fulton Bank worked in the Kennedy Administration's National
Security detail. He worked on classified communications right inside the White
House up until JFK was assassinated. He was sent their by DOD. This was a time
when by Father was traveling the World, while at the same time running Caterbone
Cleaners, Inc., all while being the Father of six boys. If you look at my Father's ID
picture, he looks like pure intell, not a Dry Cleaner. I also posted my new
Video Library page to my website yesterday. The proposal Jay Curtis was referring to
was for the Department of Defense." </div> <a style="font-weight: bold;
class="RE">New Video Library</a> New Mind Control Video Library</a> Stan J.
Caterbone Advanced Media
Group www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com September 23, 2009 </li><li style="font-family:
class="RE">HAARP, The United States Government, The Advanced Media Group,
and U.S. Sponsored Mind Control.</a> </li><li style="font-family:
Verdana;"> </li><li style="font-family: Verdana;">September 22, 2009 </li><li style="font-family:
Verdana; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 204);"><a style="color: rgb(0, 0, 204);"
target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/letter-to-steve-re-
ugi-payments-of-september-13-2009.pdf" class="RE">Letter to Steve Caterbone re
UGI Payments for 1205 Fremont Street.</a> </li><li style="font-family:
of-lancaster-aims-at-cover-up/james-street-guy-harassing-at-house-of-pasta-sept-18-
2009/" class="RE">Recording of James Street Patrolman Harassing and Stalking at
House of Pizza, Millersville Pike, Lancaster.</a> </li><li style="font-family:
target="_blank" href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/is-
sheryl-crow-another-candy-jones-september-20-2009.pdf" class="RE">Is Sheryl
Crow Another MKULTRA "Candy Jones" by Advanced Media Group.</a> </li><li
style="font-family: Verdana; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 204);"><a
style="color: rgb(0, 0, 204);" target="_blank"
aims-at-cover-up/walter-bowart-you-tube-re-robert-gates-and-anti-trust-sept-21-
2009/" class="RE">Recording of Walter Bowart, Mind Control researcher, re Robert
Gates and Anti-Trust Issues.</a> </li><li style="font-family: Verdana; font-
target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/2009-09-21_08-07-
10-fax-to-senate-and-house-committees-re-cia-investigation.pdf"
class="RE">September 21, 2009 Facsimile Sent to U.S. House Intelligence; Senate
Intelligence; Senate Judiciary Committees.</a> </li><li style="font-family:
of-lancaster-aims-at-cover-up/duke-street-business-center-08-13373-case-file-
september-18-2009/" class="RE">Case No. CI-08-13373 ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
v. Duke Street Library Case File.</a></li><li style="font-family: Verdana; font-weight: bold; color:
rgb(0, 0, 204);"><a style="color: rgb(0, 0,
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/cia-materials-
regarding-mind-control-september-21-2009.pdf" class="RE">CIA Materials
Regarding Mind Control Documents From Archives.</a> </li><a
style="font-family: Verdana; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 204);"
target="_blank" href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/cia-
materials-regarding-mind-control-september-21-2009.pdf" class="RE"></a><li
style="font-family: Verdana; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 204);"><a
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/the-cia-mind-
control-doctor-from-harvard-to-guantanamo.pdf" class="RE">CIA Mind Doctor From
Guantanomo to Harvard.</a> </li><li style="font-family: Verdana; font-
target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/electronic-mind-
control-presented-in-newsfinder-in-september-2009.pdf" class="RE">History of U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control in Newsfinder Magazine, September of
2009.</a> </li><li style="font-family: Verdana; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0,
0, 204);"><a style="color: rgb(0, 0, 204);" target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/samuel-p-
caterbone-jr-father-mind-control-documentation.pdf" class="RE">Samuel P.
Caterbone, Jr., (Father) Mind Control Evidence and Documentation.</a></li><li style="font-family: Verdana;
font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 204);"><a style="color: rgb(0, 0, 204);" target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/sammy-caterbone-
mk-ultra-documentation-filed-as-exhibit-y-in-ci-08-13373-on-april-6-2009.pdf"
class="RE">Samuel A. Caterbone (Brother) Mind Control Evidence and
Documentation.</a></li><li
style="font-family: Verdana; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 204);"><a style="color: rgb(0, 0, 204);"
target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/added-parties-to-ci-
08-13373-lancaster-county-court-of-common-pleas-september-18-2009.pdf"
class="RE">Additional Parties Named in Case No. CI-08-13373 ADVANCED MEDIA
GROUP v. Duke Street Business Center.</a></li><li style="font-family: Verdana; font-weight: bold; color:
rgb(0, 0, 204);"><a
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/judge-mclaughlin-
case-no-05-2288-and-06-4650-motion-to-withdraw-october-18-2008.pdf"
class="RE">Judge McLaughlin U.S. District Court Cases 05-2288 and 06-4650
Motion to Withdraw Without Prejudice.</a></li><a style="font-family: Verdana;
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/judge-mclaughlin-
case-no-05-2288-and-06-4650-motion-to-withdraw-october-18-2008.pdf"
class="RE"></a><li style="font-family: Verdana;"><a style="font-weight: bold;
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/judge_mclaughlin_0
5-2288_order_granted_withdraw_oct_30_2008.pdf" class="RE">Judge McLaughlin
U.S. District Court Cases 05-2288 and 06-4650 ORDER Granting Motion to
Withdraw.</a> </li><li style="font-
family: Verdana;"> </li><li style="font-family: Verdana;">September 20, 2009 </li><li style="font-family:
Verdana;"><a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 153);"
target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/abc-nightline-isc-
the-cia-investigation-transcript-may-23-1991.pdf" class="RE">ABC News Nightline
Transcript of May 23, 1991 titled "Arms to Iraq" and featuring ISC from Lancaster,
Pennsylvania.</a></li><li style="font-family: Verdana;"><a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 153);" target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/complaint-to-
citizens-commission-on-human-rights-for-psychiatric-abuses-file-on-august-4-
2009.pdf" class="RE">August 4, 2009 COMPLAINT filed with the Citizens
Commission on Human Rights (CCHR). </a> </li><li style="font-
family: Verdana; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 153);"><a
aims-at-cover-up/al-shulz001/" class="RE">Recorded Audio Transcript of an
Appointment with Dr. Al Shulz, M.D. Psychiatrist in January of 1998</a>. </li><li style="font-family:
href="http://www.youtube.com/results?
search_query=MKULTRA+mind+control+microwave+weapon+richard+helms+sidn
ey+gottlieb+cia+lsd+mpd+satanic+ritual+abuse&search=related&v=po
tHRCs06Q4&page=1" class="RE">Video Library of some 50 Documentaries on
Mind Control; Electronic Weapons; Telepathy; etc.,; From FFCHS.</a> </li><li
style="font-family: Verdana;"> </li><li style="font-family:
Verdana;"> </li><li style="font-family:
Verdana;">September 12,
2009 </li><li style="font-family:
0);"><a class="RE"
href="http://radicalfilms.co.uk/2007/10/19/dr-nick-begich-at-eceti-the-battle-for-
your-mind-and-what-you-can-do-about-it-easily-the-most-important-film-youll-see-
this-year-ed/" target="_blank">Video of Mind Conrol
Prsentation by Dr. Nick Begich, 2007 1hour 20 minutes, Excellent Video!
</a>
 </li><li style="font-family:
0);"><a
class="RE"
href="http://www.layinstitute.org/linstituteuploads/articles/SynTelepathy.pdf"
target="_blank">Synthetic Telepathy and the Early Mind
Wars, by Richard Allen Miller, 2001</a>
 </li><li><a class="RE"
href="http://www.layinstitute.org/linstituteuploads/articles/LaserInnovations.PDF"
target="_blank">Science and Technology for new
Department of Defense (DOD) Capabilities, by Naval Research</a>
href="http://www.layinstitute.org/linstituteuploads/articles/ControlledOffensiveBeha
vior.pdf" target="_blank">Controlled Offensive Behavior
USSR and Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA)</a>
style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Defense Intelligence
Agency (DIA) Soviet and Czecoslovakian Parasychology Research</a>
 </li><li>Advanced Neural Implants and Control
by DARPA</a>
href="http://www.layinstitute.org/linstituteuploads/articles/MindControlHumanRights
.pdf" target="_blank">United States Electronic Weapons
and Human Rights, by Peter Phillips, Lew Brown, and Lee Thorton</a>
href="http://www.layinstitute.org/linstituteuploads/articles/MindControl.pdf"
target="_blank">Mind Control, The Ultimate Brave New
World, by Nick Begich</a>
 </li><li><a class="RE" href="http://www.haarp.net/"
target="_blank">HAARP - The Milatary's Pandoras Box Into
Non-Lethal Weapons, by Nick Begich and Jean Manning</a>
href="http://www.layinstitute.org/src/subcategory.asp?catid=7&subcatid=8"
target="_blank">Layinstitute Research Articles on Mind
Control</a>
0);"><a class="RE"
href="http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/COINTELPRO/cointelpro-
methods.html" target="_blank">COINTELPRO Revisited -
Spying & Disruption</a>
</li> <li></li> <li>June 2, 2009
 </li><li><a
aims-at-cover-up/incident-reports-april-24-to-june-2-2009-2/" target="_blank"
rel="nofollow">Incident Reports April 24 to June 2,
2009</a>
 </li><li>Advanced Media Group
Accounts Receivables June 1,
2009</a> <a
aims-at-cover-up/southern-regional-police-department-invoice-may-31-2009/"
id="lw_1252731898_2">Southern Regional
Police Department Invoice May 31,
2009</a> </li><li><a href="http://advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com/2008/05/09/city-of-
lancaster-aims-at-cover-up/lancaster-empolyment-training-agency-invoice-may-31-
2009/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Lancaster Empolyment
Training Agency Invoice May 31,
style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"><a
aims-at-cover-up/millersville-university-red-rose-transit-bus-fare-may-28-20/"
id="lw_1252731898_4">Millersville University-
Red Rose Transit Bus Fare May 28,
style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"><a
aims-at-cover-up/05-23059-bankr-ed-pa-docket-as-of-26-may-2009/"
target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Chapter 11 Case
No. 05-23059 (Bankr. ED Pa) Docket (as of 26 May
2009</a>
aims-at-cover-up/advanced-media-group-accounts-receivables-june-1-2009-2/"
id="lw_1252731898_5">Pennslvyania Insurance
Department State Farm Complaint
Invoice</a>
aims-at-cover-up/duke-street-business-center-08-13373-case-file-june-2-2009/"
id="lw_1252731898_6">48 Mbytes Duke
Street Business Center 08-13373 CASE FILE June 2,
2009</a> </li><li> </li><li>May
27, 2009 </li><li><a
aims-at-cover-up/letter-of-admissions-millersville-university-graduate-studies-
research-may-13-2009/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Letter
of Admissions Millersville University Graduate Studies & Research May 13,
2009</a> </li><li><a
aims-at-cover-
up/james_wolbert_protection_against_electronic_harassment_court_order_document
_december_2008-3/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">James
Wolbert Protection Against Electronic Harassment COURT ORDER Document
December 2008</a>
 </li><li><a
aims-at-cover-up/job-applications-portfolio-for-stan-j-caterbone-2005-to-2009-may-
26-2009/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Job
Applications Portfolio for Stan J. Caterbone 2005 to 2009 May 26,
aims-at-cover-up/letter-to-r-scott-smith-fulton-bank-re-defense-intelligence-agency-
mkultra-december-3-2007-with-research/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Letter to R Scott Smith Fulton Bank re Defense
Intelligence Agency & MKULTRA December 3, 2007 with
Research</a>GAO
Report on Human Experimentation File No. 152601 March
aims-at-cover-up/president-obamas-cyber-security-act-of-2009/" target="_blank"
rel="nofollow">President Obamas Cyber Security Act
of 2009</a> </li><li> </li><li>May 22, 2009 </li><li><a
aims-at-cover-up/advanced-media-press-release-organized-stalking-and-directed-
energy-devices-and-weapons-bill-may-20-2009/" target="_blank"
color="#0000cc" face="Verdana">Adnced Mvaedia Press Release
Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons Bill May 20,
2009</a>Freedon From Covert Harassment and Surveillance
(FFCHS) Website May 19, 2009</a> </li><li>Weapons
Bil</a><a
weapons-bill-press-release-may-20-2009/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">AMG Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices
and </a><a
weapons-bill-press-release-may-20-2009/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">l PRESS RELEASE May 20, 2009</a><a
weapons-bill-press-release-may-20-2009/" target="_blank"
rel="nofollow"></a>
 </li><li>Information Inventory Assets and Property of 1250
Fremont Street May 17, 2009</a> </li><li><a
aims-at-cover-up/pennslvyania-insurance-department-state-farm-complaint-april-24-
face="Verdana">Pennslvyania Insurance Department State Farm
Complaint April 24, 2009</a> </li><li><a
aims-at-cover-up/lancaster-city-incident-reports-may-19-2009/" target="_blank"
color="#0000cc" face="Verdana">Lancaster City Incident Reports May
19, 2009</a>SSA
Social Security Claim Report Form May 15,
2009</a>Chapter 11 05-23059 Amended
Recievables May 11, 2009</a>
aims-at-cover-up/duke-st-business-center-case-08-13373-praecipe-to-file-exhibit-a-
8-may-18-2009-2/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Duke
St. Business Center Case 08-13373 PRAECIPE To File Exhibit A-8 May 18,
2009</a>
face="Verdana">April, 2009 </li><li><a
aims-at-cover-up/u-s-attorney-complaint-of-april-25-2009-re-mind-control-lancaster-
county-pennsylvania/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">U.S.
Attorney Complaint of April 25, 2009 re Mind Control & Lancaster County,
Pennsylvania</a>U.S. Attorney
Complaint of April 25, 2009 re 1252 Fremont Street; William Lefty Plank; Lancaster
City Police Department</a>CI-08-13373 MKULTRA Evidence and Research
Exhibit</a>CI-08-13373 Sammy Caterbone Investigation
face="Verdana">CI-08-13373 Stan J. Caterbone Psychiatric History
aims-at-cover-up/docket-number-2843-2006/" target="_blank"
color="#0000cc" face="Verdana">Criminal Case No. 2843-2006 East
Lampeter Charges</a>Criminal Case No. 3179-2006 Fleeing
Charge</a>Criminal Case No. 4771-2006 DUI
Charges Dismissed</a> </li><li><a
aims-at-cover-up/email-to-us-secretary-department-of-state-march-11-2009/"
id="lw_1252731898_29">Email to U.S. Secretary
Department of State March 11,
2009</a>Letter to Brewster of PA Civil Rights & Employment
Applications of 2006 to 2007 feb 8
aims-at-cover-up/email-to-mike-caterbone-re-income-and-ppl-dispute-of-march-31-
id="lw_1252731898_31">Email to Mike
Caterbone re Income and PPL Dispute of March 31,
aims-at-cover-up/2nd-copy-max-release-settlement-070829-september-17-2007/"
id="lw_1252731898_32">2nd Copy Max Release
& Settlement 070829-september 17,
aims-at-cover-up/appeal-hearing-statutes-for-april-30-2007-apr-27-2007/"
id="lw_1252731898_33">Legal Notes and
Research 2005 to 2009</a> </li><li><a
aims-at-cover-up/stan-caterbone-lchs-high-school-transcripts-1976/"
id="lw_1252731898_34">Stan Caterbone LCHS
High School Transcripts
aims-at-cover-up/stan-caterbone-football-scrapbook-sophmore-junior-senior-year-
1974-1975-june-24-2007/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Stan
Caterbone Football Scrapbook Sophmore & Junior Senior Year 1973-
1974 </a> </li><li><a
aims-at-cover-up/pflumm-contractors-american-management-proposal-april-26-
1996-may-4-2007/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Pflumm Contractors
American Management Proposal April 26 1996 may 4
aims-at-cover-up/mutant-mania-digital-movie-june-1987-may-2-2007/"
id="lw_1252731898_37">Mutant Mania Digital
Movie Sony Joint Venture Proposal June
aims-at-cover-up/radio-science-laboratories-business-plan-march-19-1989/"
id="lw_1252731898_38">Radio Science
Laboratories Business Plan March 19,
aims-at-cover-up/probation-pre-sentance-worksheet-june-12-2007/" target="_blank"
color="#0000cc">Probation Pre Sentance Worksheet June 12
aims-at-cover-up/advanced-media-group-cd-rom-manufacturing-discs-1991-may-3-
2007/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Advanced Media Group CD ROM Manufacturing Discs 1989 to
1992 </a> </li><li>Lancaster General
Hospital Notes & Records April 5 to 10,
aims-at-cover-up/1470-manheim-pike-sam-caterbone-cleaners-deeds-transfers/"
id="lw_1252731898_41">1470 Manheim Pike
Sam Caterbone Cleaners Deeds & 1973
Transfer</a>1983 433 West Marion Street Deed & 1987
Transfer</a>2008 United States
Postal Inspector Investigation re MJ
Corricelli</a>1987 ISC
Whistleblower Matix & Jere Sullivan Russian Book
Deal</a>1987 Jere
Elmo Sullivan; Mary Lynn Dipaolo Call to Dr. Al
Schulz</a>1986 2323 New
Danville Pike Deeds Part 1</a></a>1988-2323 New
Danville Pike Foreclosure Part
aims-at-cover-
up/2323_new_danville_pike_conestoga_deeds_current_to_1986_july_23_2008-part-
Danville Pike Foreclosure Part
aims-at-cover-up/deed_to_1250_fremont_street_lancaster_pa__july_16_2008/"
id="lw_1252731898_49">1953 1250 Fremont
Street Deed Yolanda and Samuel
Caterbone</a>220 Stone Hill Road
Deed Transfer January 31,
2007_</a>Master Mental Duress Documents June 9
0
7</a>
 </li><li><a href="http://advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com/2008/05/09/city-
of-lancaster-aims-at-cover-up/stan-caterbone-football-scrapbook-senior-year-season-
1975-june-24-2007/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Stan Caterbone
Football Scrapbook Senior Year Season 1975 june 24
aims-at-cover-up/joseph-f-roda-documents-for-sammy-guerin-june-29-2007/"
id="lw_1252731898_53">Joseph Roda, Esq.,
Sammy-Guerin (ISC)-Tate Documents June 29,
aims-at-cover-up/advanced-media-group-v-duke-street-center-lancaster-county-
library-dec-3-2008/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Advanced Media Group
v. Duke Street Business Center/Lancaster County Library Dec 3,
aims-at-cover-up/judge_mclaughlin_05-2288_4650_motion__exhibits-part-
1_to_withdraw_october_16_20081/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">US
District Court 05-2288 Motion to Withdraw Part 1 October 16,
aims-at-cover-up/judge_mclaughlin_05-2288_4650_exhibits-part-
2_to_withdraw__opinion_of_3rd_october_16_20081/" target="_blank"
color="#0000cc">US District Court 05-2288 Motion to Withdraw Part 2 October 16,
aims-at-cover-up/lancaster_county_judges_9_salary_history/" target="_blank"
color="#0000cc">Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas 2009
Salaries</a>US Attorney Crimial
Complaint re Samuel Caterbone Criminal February 6,
aims-at-cover-up/yolanda-caterbone-liheap-notice-of-benefits-march-4-20092/"
id="lw_1252731898_59">Yolanda Caterbone
LIHEAP Notice of Benefits March 4,
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/third-circuit-
opinion-07-4474-07-4475-reversed-sept-30-2008.pdf" target="_blank"
rel="nofollow">Third Circuit Opinion Case
No. 07-4474/4475 Dismiss Reversed Sept 30,
2008</a>.Third circuit 07-4474/07-
4475 Certified Judgment October 22,
2008</a>.
 </li><li>High American Helix & Advanced
Media Group Memos Part 1.</a>Advanced Media Group File Inventory List of
group-invoices-1990-1991-oct-26-2006.pdf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Advanced Media Group Invoices 1989 to
color: blue; font-style: normal; font-family: Verdana;"><a
href="http://advancedmediagroupresearch.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/esp-
mental-telepathy-research-documents-november-13-2007.pdf" target="_blank"
decoration: none;">Click Here For Exhibit A and
the Conduct of City of Lancaster Officials and the Lancaster City Police Department.
(This Document is The Work and Research of The Advanced Media Group published
in 2007.)</a> </li><li><a
href="http://books.google.com/books?
hl=en&id=iDIEnK522TgC&dq=rogue+cia&printsec=frontcover&
source=web&ots=wX5QSTbHur&sig=2kwpmzF0OpZqKRX6QpW13POw9s
k#PPP1,M1" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Click Here To Connect The Dot To The
Bush Administration</a><a title="See Are the
Southern Regional Police Agents For Fulton Bank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/are-the-southern-
regional-police-agents-of-corruption.pdf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">See Are the
Southern Regional Police Agents For Fulton Bank?
</a> <address><a title="See How Fulton
Bank, et al, Stole My House and All Contents and To Keep My Legal Files"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/superior-court-
1463-fulton-bank-foreclosure-theft-of-property-jan-20-2008.pdf" target="_blank"
rel="nofollow">See How Fulton Bank, et al, Stole My House and All Contents and
Kept My Legal Files</a>.</address> </li><li><a
title="ABC News 20/20"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/abc-news-20-20-isc-
cluster-bombs-to-iraq-story-feb-1-2007.pdf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">ABC News 20/20
February 1, 1991 Episode on ISC (International Signal &
Control)</a> </li><li><a title="$1 Billion
Dollar Fraud"
href="http://advancedmediagroupresearch.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/lnp-isc-
headlines-may-22-2007.pdf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">$ISC $1
Billion Dollar Fraud</a>. </li><li><a title="Lancaster Newspapers, Inc. ISC related"
href="http://advancedmediagroupresearch.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/isc-search-
lancaster-newspapers-archives-dec-25-2007.pdf" target="_blank"
rel="nofollow">Lancaster Newspapers, Inc. ISC related Articles in
Archives.</a> </li><li><a title="James Guerin,
founder and CEO, had bank accounts at Fulton Bank"
href="http://advancedmediagroupresearch.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/guerin-and-
isc-use-a-fulton-bank-account.pdf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">James Guerin, founder and CEO, had bank accounts at
Fulton Bank.</a>
<a title="(See the amended complaint for U.S. District Court 05-
2288)"
href="http://advancedmediagroupresearch.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/judge-
mary-mclaughlin-05-2288-amendment-to-complaint-october-12-2007.pdf"
target="_blank" rel="nofollow">See the
amended complaint for U.S. District Court 05-2288)</a>.
 </li><li><a
title="ABC News Nightline broadcast of September 13, 1991 by Ted Koppel."
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/how-us-arms-and-
technology-were-transferred-to-iraq-abc-nightline-sept-13-1991-highlighted.pdf"
target="_blank" rel="nofollow">ABC News Nightline broadcastof
September 13, 1991 by Ted Koppel</a><a title="ABC
News Nightline broadcast of September 13, 1991 by Ted Koppel."
target="_blank" rel="nofollow">
</a>.<a title="You can view the
first (May 23, 1991) transcript of the Financial Times of London"
the-cia-investigation-transcript-may-23-1991.pdf" target="_blank"
face="Verdana">
</a> </li><li><a title="You can
view the first (May 23, 1991) transcript of the Financial Times of London"
face="Verdana">You can view the first (May 23, 1991) transcript of the
Financial Times of London</a><a title="You can view
the first (May 23, 1991) transcript of the Financial Times of London"
face="Verdana">You can view the first (May 23, 1991) transcript of the
Financial Times of London</a>.<a
href="http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/gpage9.html" target="_blank"
</a> </li><li><a
href="http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/gpage9.html" target="_blank"
rel="nofollow">Advanced Media Group, Ltd., a Leading Provider of Digital and Information
Technologies Webpage.</a><a
href="http://www.cityoflancasterpa.com/lancastercity/cwp/view.asp?
A=672&Q=517632" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">
href="http://www.cityoflancasterpa.com/lancastercity/cwp/view.asp?
A=672&Q=517632" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Lancaster
City Mayor Rick Gray Biography</a>.<a title="You can review my
transcript of my 1987 interview with Pennsylvania Securities Commission Agent
Howard Eisler."
pa-securities-commission-investigation-sep-29-1987.pdf" target="_blank"
</a> </li><li><a title="You can
review my transcript of my 1987 interview with Pennsylvania Securities Commission
Agent Howard Eisler."
pa-securities-commission-investigation-sep-29-1987.pdf" target="_blank"
color="#0000cc">You can review my transcript of my 1987 interview with
Pennsylvania Securities Commission Agent Howard
Eisler</a>.<a href="http://www.fult.com/"
none;">
</a> </li><li><a
href="http://www.fult.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Fulton Financial Corporation
website (a $ billion dollar enterprise)</a>.
<a href="http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Business_
%26_Finance/Investments/Stocks_%28A_to_Z%29/Stocks_F/threadview?
bn=7447&tid=1965&mid=1968" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"></a> </li><li>Message of
August 13, 2007 of the Upcoming Losses for Fulton Financial on the Yahoo Stock
message board</a>
 </li><li>Y<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=7kOIOTpxtj8" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">ou can view the news broadcasts of the
1991 ISC (Internatioanl Signal & Control)
indictments.</a><a
href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9gTaCexSNc" target="_blank"
color="#0000cc"> </a> </li><li>This is the link to part 2 of the ISC Indictment WGAL News
broadcast from my website</a>.<a
href="http://local.lancasteronline.com/4/214152" target="_blank"
rel="nofollow">Bomb: Wars deadly legacy
To ban the (cluster) bomb</a>.
 </li><li><a href="http://local.lancasteronline.com/4/214152"
target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Bomb: Wars
deadly legacy To ban the (cluster)
bomb</a>
 </li><li><a
href="http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/4724766.html" target="_blank"
color="#0000cc">ISC Technologies, Inc., Cluster Bomb Patent of February 26,
blue; font-style: normal; font-family: Verdana;"><a
href="http://mondediplo.com/2002/03/03uranium" target="_blank"
href="http://mondediplo.com/2002/03/03uranium" target="_blank"
color="#0000cc">Americas big dirty
secret</a>
none;">ISC, Advanced Media Group, and the
Whistleblower</a>. </li><li><a title="an agreement"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2007/12/signed-
nondisclosure-roger-fitzwater-movie-theater-dec-17-2007.pdf" target="_blank"
color="#0000cc">Advanced Media Groups Agreement (click to view) with Sound
Company for the Movie Theater at Hotel
Brunswick.</a> </li><li><span style="font-
family: 'Times New Roman'; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight:
normal; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch:
normal; font-family: Verdana;"><a
plan-aug-18-2006-updated-feb-10-sept-26-2007.pdf" target="_blank"
color="#0000cc">Project 1 Excelsior Place on East King Street Business
Plan.</a>Advanced Media Group 2005 Exclusive agreement for the UPS
Shipping Store in Downtown
Lancaster.</a> </li><li><span style="font-
family: 'Times New Roman'; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight:
normal; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch:
normal; font-family: Verdana;"><a href="http://www.mbe.com/ps/index.html"
none;">UPS Shipping/Copy
Store</a> Franchis
Information.<a
href="http://www.franchising.com/upsstore/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">
href="http://www.franchising.com/upsstore/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">UPS/MBE
Franchise is ranked, View Here.</a></a> </li><li><a
href="http://advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com/2007/12/31/downtown-lancaster-
movie-theater-at-hotel-brunswick/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Advanced Media Group Project 3 Downtown Lancaster
Movie Theater</a>.<a
href="http://www.co.lancaster.pa.us/lancastercity/lib/lancastercity/lancaster_square_
master_plan.pdf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">
href="http://www.co.lancaster.pa.us/lancastercity/lib/lancastercity/lancaster_square_
master_plan.pdf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Advanced Media Group
Project 4 Big Box Retail in Downtown
Lancaster</a>.<a title="See our recomendations for the
Lancaster Convention Center at Lancaster Square and a Hard Rock Cafe at the Watt
& Shand site."
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/hotel-brunswick-
proposal-mar-16-2005.pdf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">
</a> </li><li><a title="See our
recomendations for the Lancaster Convention Center at Lancaster Square and a
Hard Rock Cafe at the Watt & Shand site."
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/hotel-brunswick-
proposal-mar-16-2005.pdf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">See our recommendations
for the Lancaster Convention Center at
Lancaster</a>April of 2005 we sued the Lancaster County Hoteliers for refusing
to pay the Tourism Excise Tax See
Here</a>Non Disclosure Agreement with Realtor
Jeff</a><a title="ABC News Nightline broadcast of
September 13, 1991 by Ted Koppel."
target="_blank" rel="nofollow">
</a><a
color="#0000cc">Lefevre and Caldwell Banker For Excelsior Place in Downtown
Lancaster</a>Advanced Media
Group Authored the Development Plan for the S.N. Lombardo Development in
2007.</a><span style="font-size: 10pt; color:
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/netwerk-
management-clipper-stadium-agreement-for-sara-mclachlan.pdf" target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/netwerk-
management-clipper-stadium-agreement-for-sara-mclachlan.pdf" target="_blank"
color="#0000cc">I (Advanced Media Group) had begun talks with Sara McLachlan
for a Show at Clipper Stadium, View Agreements
Here.</a>Sheryl Crow
Share Certificate of Advanced Media Group of
2005.</a></li></ol>
NEW VIDEO LIBRARY
<object width="340" height="285"><param name="movie"

value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7kOIOTpxtj8&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&co
lor2=0xcd311b&border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen"
value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess"
value="always"></param><embed
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7kOIOTpxtj8&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&color
2=0xcd311b&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"
allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="340"
height="285"></embed></object>

value="http://www.youtube.com/v/X9gTaCexSNc&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&c
olor2=0xcd311b&border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen"
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/X9gTaCexSNc&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&col
or2=0xcd311b&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"

value="http://www.youtube.com/v/he2FqNEYSwU&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&
color2=0xcd311b&border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen"
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/he2FqNEYSwU&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&col

value="http://www.youtube.com/v/g1wgwSoRuBw&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719
&color2=0xcd311b&border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen"
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/g1wgwSoRuBw&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&co
lor2=0xcd311b&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"

value="http://www.youtube.com/v/FcZBv6-
42bc&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&border=1"></param></param><param
name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/FcZBv6-
42bc&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&border=1"
type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always"
allowfullscreen="true" width="340" height="285"></embed></object>

value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RSpEO6D3b84&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RSpEO6D3b84&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&co
lor2=0xcd311b&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"

value="http://www.youtube.com/v/olG_WGiMB8Y&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/olG_WGiMB8Y&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&col

value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Sv3xGAoAtrQ&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&c
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Sv3xGAoAtrQ&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&col

value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ckw9BGC4cYo&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ckw9BGC4cYo&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&col

value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gk4w7ZiOIyY&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&c
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gk4w7ZiOIyY&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&colo
r2=0xcd311b&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"

value="http://www.youtube.com/v/UFupcSrWzi8&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&c
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/UFupcSrWzi8&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&colo
r2=0xcd311b&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"

value="http://www.youtube.com/v/EtI5PSh2Lko&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&co
lor2=0xcd311b&border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen"
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/EtI5PSh2Lko&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&color
2=0xcd311b&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"

value="http://www.youtube.com/v/DMBjsbUXR0Q&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/DMBjsbUXR0Q&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&col
MIND CONTROL VIDEO LIBRARY
Thursday, October 29, 2009 12:27:22

PM <div style="text-align: justify;"><a style="font-family: Verdana;
href="http://www.catholicmonarchy.com/blog/?p=175" class="RE">This video is an
excerpt from a speech President Clinton gave acknowledging that the US
government conducted secret radiation experiments on the civilian
population.</a> </div> <object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/u22mphQsn5s&color1=0xb1b1b1&col
or2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"><param
name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess"
value="always"><embed
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/u22mphQsn5s&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2
=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"
allowscriptaccess="always" height="344" width="425"></object> <div
style="text-align: justify;"></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><a style="font-weight:
bold; font-family: Verdana; color: rgb(0, 0, 204);" target="_blank"
href="http://www.themenwhostareatgoatsmovie.com/#home"
class="RE"> "The Men Who Stare At Goats" Debuts in Theaters Across
America On November 6, 2009.</a> <a style="font-weight: bold; font-
href="http://www.themenwhostareatgoatsmovie.com/#home" class="RE"> <object
height="252" width="448"><param name="allowfullscreen"
value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><param
name="wmode" value="transparent"><param name="movie"
allowscriptaccess="always" wmode="transparent" height="252"
width="448"></object> <object width="320" height="265"><param
name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/e2g_zPF4OJA&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x234900&c
olor2=0x4e9e00"></param><param name="allowFullScreen"
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/e2g_zPF4OJA&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x234900&colo
r2=0x4e9e00" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always"
allowfullscreen="true" width="320"
height="265"></embed></object> <object height="285"
width="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-
RraLw0MIeY&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x402061&color
2=0x9461ca&border=1"><param name="allowFullScreen"
value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-
2=0x9461ca&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"
allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" height="285"
width="340"></object> <object height="285" width="340"><param
name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7Ac3Tp1wtlo&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0
&color1=0x402061&color2=0x9461ca&border=1"><param
name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess"
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7Ac3Tp1wtlo&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&a
mp;color1=0x402061&color2=0x9461ca&border=1" type="application/x-
shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" height="285"
name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/WOd9dpIq6rY&hl=en&fs=1&rel=
0&color1=0x402061&color2=0x9461ca&border=1"><param
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/WOd9dpIq6rY&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&
amp;color1=0x402061&color2=0x9461ca&border=1"
allowfullscreen="true" height="285" width="340"></object> <object
height="285" width="340"><param name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/MDnqEETNvyg&hl=en&fs=1&rel=
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/MDnqEETNvyg&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0
&color1=0x402061&color2=0x9461ca&border=1"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RBmJDAunRPE&hl=en&fs=1&rel=
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RBmJDAunRPE&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&
allowfullscreen="true" height="285" width="340"></object> </a> <a
target="_blank" href="http://www.youtube.com/user/adpuncak" class="RE">The
film about war crimes using microwave weapons to neutralize and kill political
activists and whistleblowers. </a><a style="font-
href="http://www.youtube.com/user/adpuncak" class="RE">The author has
interviewed 200 targets who have been turned into human guinea pigs to perfect
electromagnetic weapons and the science of behavior
modification.</a> </div><object height="285" width="340"><param
name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-
uoMrdvAOvE&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311
b&border=1"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param
b&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"
width="340"></object> <div style="text-align: justify;"><a style="font-
href="http://imvivo.com/DetailsView/tabid/104/indexid/1778253/Default.aspx#down
load" class="RE">September 27, 2009 Excellent New Video Titled "#HAARP -
Nature Modification Weapon Supposed Weather modification, communication
disruption and mind control Weapon." This video reviews the Star Wars Initiative
and HAARP in relation to Weapons of Mind Control by James
Wallce.</a> </div> <object height="322" width="512"><param
name="movie" value="http://d.yimg.com/static.video.yahoo.com/yep/YV_YEP.swf?
ver=2.2.46"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param
name="AllowScriptAccess" value="always"><param name="bgcolor"
value="#000000"><param name="flashVars"
value="id=4171908&vid=1162034&lang=en-
us&intl=us&thumbUrl=http
%3A//l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sch/cn/v/v3/w332/1162034_400_300.jpeg&embed=1">
<embed src="http://d.yimg.com/static.video.yahoo.com/yep/YV_YEP.swf?
ver=2.2.46" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true"
allowscriptaccess="always" bgcolor="#000000"
flashvars="id=4171908&vid=1162034&lang=en-
%3A//l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sch/cn/v/v3/w332/1162034_400_300.jpeg&embed=1"
height="285" width="340"></object> <object height="285"
width="340"><param name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/kuHOy3uMFSk&hl=en&fs=1&colo
r1=0x234900&color2=0x4e9e00&border=1"><param
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/kuHOy3uMFSk&hl=en&fs=1&color1
=0x234900&color2=0x4e9e00&border=1" type="application/x-
name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ec6lm4toI28&hl=en&fs=1&color1
=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&border=1"><param
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ec6lm4toI28&hl=en&fs=1&color1=
0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-
flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" height="285"
width="340"></object> <object height="285"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YRXyEQU5YuQ&hl=en&fs=1&rel=
0&color1=0x234900&color2=0x4e9e00&border=1"><param
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YRXyEQU5YuQ&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&
amp;color1=0x234900&color2=0x4e9e00&border=1"
allowfullscreen="true" height="285"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/LoUwDAWqcuc&hl=en&fs=1&colo
r1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&border=1"><param
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/LoUwDAWqcuc&hl=en&fs=1&color1
=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&border=1" type="application/x-
name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/L-
BlZgJYuo0&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&
amp;border=1"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/L-
amp;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/1MaMWMfEmt4&hl=en&fs=1&col
or1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&border=1"><param
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/1MaMWMfEmt4&hl=en&fs=1&color
1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&border=1" type="application/x-
name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/aP9_Fc-
NwUk&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&amp
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/aP9_Fc-
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/MnRPZOUVhJ4&color1=0xb1b1b1&col
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/MnRPZOUVhJ4&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2
allowscriptaccess="always" height="285"
width="340"></object><div> <object height="285"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/G_c7JTADT_k&hl=en&fs=1&color1
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/G_c7JTADT_k&hl=en&fs=1&color1=
name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/KWA9kjtvjo4&hl=en&fs=1&color1
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/KWA9kjtvjo4&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0
x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-
name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/dOARWX3OjFc&hl=en&fs=1&colo
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/dOARWX3OjFc&hl=en&fs=1&color1
name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/potHRCs06Q4&hl=en&fs=1&color
1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&border=1"><param
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/potHRCs06Q4&hl=en&fs=1&color1
name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/IStoyUb697c&hl=en&fs=1&color1
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/IStoyUb697c&hl=en&fs=1&color1=
name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RuZ069smaYU&hl=en&fs=1&colo
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RuZ069smaYU&hl=en&fs=1&color1
name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/3yz-
3Cd90Wo&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/3yz-
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7F-
kRe__0dg&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7F-
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/UVAMc231nhc&hl=en&fs=1&colo
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/UVAMc231nhc&hl=en&fs=1&color1
name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GIrY2WE6IeQ&hl=en&fs=1&color
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GIrY2WE6IeQ&hl=en&fs=1&color1=
width="340"></object> <object height="285"
width="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/UHxi7-
wG0n8&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&am
p;border=1"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/UHxi7-
p;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/kdt8nJupJ-
M&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&bor
der=1"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/kdt8nJupJ-
der=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hR3Iul9IIQA&hl=en&fs=1&color1
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hR3Iul9IIQA&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/93p7oDkA5WA&hl=en&fs=1&rel=
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/93p7oDkA5WA&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0
&color1=0x234900&color2=0x4e9e00&border=1"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/t80aN4EIifU&hl=en&fs=1&color1
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/t80aN4EIifU&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0
name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/EkZngfv8rGQ&hl=en&fs=1&color
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/EkZngfv8rGQ&hl=en&fs=1&color1=
name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GZkk0OJxTzU&hl=en&fs=1&color
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GZkk0OJxTzU&hl=en&fs=1&color1=
name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6MnaftHIsE4&hl=en&fs=1&color1
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6MnaftHIsE4&hl=en&fs=1&color1=
width="340"> </object> <object height="285"
naI9SXgDOU&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311
name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/uCw2oful-
vI&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&bor
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/uCw2oful-
width="340"> </object> </div> <object height="285"
width="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ryagFq-
vMJs&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&
border=1"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ryagFq-
border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/EVU8sSElpGE&hl=en&fs=1&color
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/EVU8sSElpGE&hl=en&fs=1&color1=
width="340"> <object height="285" width="340"><param
name="movie"
width="340"></object> </object> <object height="285"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/TzkDReWE0Fc&hl=en&fs=1&colo
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/TzkDReWE0Fc&hl=en&fs=1&color1
width="340"></object> <object height="285"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gJnQbPtgMAU&color1=0xb1b1b1&colo
r2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"><param
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gJnQbPtgMAU&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2
allowscriptaccess="always" height="285" width="340"></object> <object
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/T6zFT8iNWzI&color1=0xb1b1b1&color
2=0xcfcfcf&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"><param
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/T6zFT8iNWzI&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=
0xcfcfcf&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-
shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="285"
width="340"></object> <object height="285" width="340"><param
name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/oSVkikqjbaE&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2
=0xcfcfcf&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"><param
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/oSVkikqjbaE&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=
name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/IStfernTpF4&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/IStfernTpF4&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0
xcfcfcf&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-
width="340"></object> 
MIND CONTROL LIBRARY
Thursday, October 29, 2009 12:27:22

PM <div style="text-align: justify;"><a style="font-family: Verdana;
href="http://www.catholicmonarchy.com/blog/?p=175" class="RE">This video is an
excerpt from a speech President Clinton gave acknowledging that the US
government conducted secret radiation experiments on the civilian
population.</a> </div> <object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/u22mphQsn5s&color1=0xb1b1b1&col
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/u22mphQsn5s&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2
allowscriptaccess="always" height="344" width="425"></object> <div
style="text-align: justify;"></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><a style="font-weight:
bold; font-family: Verdana; color: rgb(0, 0, 204);" target="_blank"
href="http://www.themenwhostareatgoatsmovie.com/#home"
class="RE"> "The Men Who Stare At Goats" Debuts in Theaters Across
America On November 6, 2009.</a> <a style="font-weight: bold; font-
href="http://www.themenwhostareatgoatsmovie.com/#home" class="RE"> <object
height="252" width="448"><param name="allowfullscreen"
value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><param
name="wmode" value="transparent"><param name="movie"
allowscriptaccess="always" wmode="transparent" height="252"
width="448"></object> <object width="320" height="265"><param
name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/e2g_zPF4OJA&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x234900&c
olor2=0x4e9e00"></param><param name="allowFullScreen"
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/e2g_zPF4OJA&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x234900&colo
r2=0x4e9e00" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always"
allowfullscreen="true" width="320"
height="265"></embed></object> <object height="285"
2=0x9461ca&border=1"><param name="allowFullScreen"
value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed
2=0x9461ca&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"
name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7Ac3Tp1wtlo&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0
&color1=0x402061&color2=0x9461ca&border=1"><param
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7Ac3Tp1wtlo&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&a
mp;color1=0x402061&color2=0x9461ca&border=1" type="application/x-
name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/WOd9dpIq6rY&hl=en&fs=1&rel=
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/WOd9dpIq6rY&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/MDnqEETNvyg&hl=en&fs=1&rel=
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/MDnqEETNvyg&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0
&color1=0x402061&color2=0x9461ca&border=1"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RBmJDAunRPE&hl=en&fs=1&rel=
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RBmJDAunRPE&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&
allowfullscreen="true" height="285" width="340"></object> </a> <a
target="_blank" href="http://www.youtube.com/user/adpuncak" class="RE">The
film about war crimes using microwave weapons to neutralize and kill political
activists and whistleblowers. </a><a style="font-
href="http://www.youtube.com/user/adpuncak" class="RE">The author has
interviewed 200 targets who have been turned into human guinea pigs to perfect
electromagnetic weapons and the science of behavior
modification.</a> </div><object height="285" width="340"><param
name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-
width="340"></object> <div style="text-align: justify;"><a style="font-
href="http://imvivo.com/DetailsView/tabid/104/indexid/1778253/Default.aspx#down
load" class="RE">September 27, 2009 Excellent New Video Titled "#HAARP -
Nature Modification Weapon Supposed Weather modification, communication
disruption and mind control Weapon." This video reviews the Star Wars Initiative
and HAARP in relation to Weapons of Mind Control by James
Wallce.</a> </div> <object height="322" width="512"><param
name="movie" value="http://d.yimg.com/static.video.yahoo.com/yep/YV_YEP.swf?
ver=2.2.46"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param
name="AllowScriptAccess" value="always"><param name="bgcolor"
value="#000000"><param name="flashVars"
value="id=4171908&vid=1162034&lang=en-
%3A//l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sch/cn/v/v3/w332/1162034_400_300.jpeg&embed=1">
<embed src="http://d.yimg.com/static.video.yahoo.com/yep/YV_YEP.swf?
ver=2.2.46" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true"
allowscriptaccess="always" bgcolor="#000000"
flashvars="id=4171908&vid=1162034&lang=en-
%3A//l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sch/cn/v/v3/w332/1162034_400_300.jpeg&embed=1"
height="285" width="340"></object> <object height="285"
name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ec6lm4toI28&hl=en&fs=1&color1
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ec6lm4toI28&hl=en&fs=1&color1=
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YRXyEQU5YuQ&hl=en&fs=1&rel=
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YRXyEQU5YuQ&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&
amp;color1=0x234900&color2=0x4e9e00&border=1"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/LoUwDAWqcuc&hl=en&fs=1&colo
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/LoUwDAWqcuc&hl=en&fs=1&color1
name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/L-
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/L-
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/1MaMWMfEmt4&hl=en&fs=1&col
or1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&border=1"><param
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/1MaMWMfEmt4&hl=en&fs=1&color
1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&border=1" type="application/x-
name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/aP9_Fc-
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/aP9_Fc-
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/MnRPZOUVhJ4&color1=0xb1b1b1&col
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/MnRPZOUVhJ4&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2
allowscriptaccess="always" height="285"
width="340"></object><div> <object height="285"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/G_c7JTADT_k&hl=en&fs=1&color1
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/G_c7JTADT_k&hl=en&fs=1&color1=
name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/KWA9kjtvjo4&hl=en&fs=1&color1
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/KWA9kjtvjo4&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0
name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/dOARWX3OjFc&hl=en&fs=1&colo
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/dOARWX3OjFc&hl=en&fs=1&color1
name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/potHRCs06Q4&hl=en&fs=1&color
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/potHRCs06Q4&hl=en&fs=1&color1
name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/IStoyUb697c&hl=en&fs=1&color1
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/IStoyUb697c&hl=en&fs=1&color1=
name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RuZ069smaYU&hl=en&fs=1&colo
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RuZ069smaYU&hl=en&fs=1&color1
name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/3yz-
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/3yz-
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7F-
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7F-
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/UVAMc231nhc&hl=en&fs=1&colo
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/UVAMc231nhc&hl=en&fs=1&color1
name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GIrY2WE6IeQ&hl=en&fs=1&color
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GIrY2WE6IeQ&hl=en&fs=1&color1=
width="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/UHxi7-
p;border=1"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/UHxi7-
p;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/kdt8nJupJ-
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/kdt8nJupJ-
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hR3Iul9IIQA&hl=en&fs=1&color1
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hR3Iul9IIQA&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/93p7oDkA5WA&hl=en&fs=1&rel=
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/93p7oDkA5WA&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0
&color1=0x234900&color2=0x4e9e00&border=1"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/t80aN4EIifU&hl=en&fs=1&color1
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/t80aN4EIifU&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0
name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/EkZngfv8rGQ&hl=en&fs=1&color
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/EkZngfv8rGQ&hl=en&fs=1&color1=
name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GZkk0OJxTzU&hl=en&fs=1&color
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GZkk0OJxTzU&hl=en&fs=1&color1=
name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6MnaftHIsE4&hl=en&fs=1&color1
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6MnaftHIsE4&hl=en&fs=1&color1=
name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/uCw2oful-
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/uCw2oful-
width="340"> </object> </div> <object height="285"
width="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ryagFq-
border=1"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ryagFq-
border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/EVU8sSElpGE&hl=en&fs=1&color
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/EVU8sSElpGE&hl=en&fs=1&color1=
width="340"> <object height="285" width="340"><param
name="movie"
width="340"></object> </object> <object height="285"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/TzkDReWE0Fc&hl=en&fs=1&colo
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/TzkDReWE0Fc&hl=en&fs=1&color1
width="340"></object> <object height="285"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gJnQbPtgMAU&color1=0xb1b1b1&colo
r2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"><param
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gJnQbPtgMAU&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2
allowscriptaccess="always" height="285" width="340"></object> <object
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/T6zFT8iNWzI&color1=0xb1b1b1&color
2=0xcfcfcf&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"><param
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/T6zFT8iNWzI&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=
name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/oSVkikqjbaE&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/oSVkikqjbaE&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=
name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube.com/v/IStfernTpF4&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/IStfernTpF4&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0
xcfcfcf&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-
width="340"></object> 
TELEPATHIC COMMUNICATIONS
 Wednesday, October 28, 2009 2:52:58 AM <div style="text-align:
center;">SHERYL CROW
AND U.S. SPONSORED MIND CONTROL </div> This is what I know, at least all that I can think
of right at the moment. It all started back in 2001 when Brett Stabley
showed up at the Pflumm residence in Conestoga. He had never been down there
before that time. He then started his affair with Pami Pflumm; all in an effort to get
me jealous. Then everyone jumped in and used it against me. The sad thing is is
that it did not bother me in the least. I don't know if people thought it was a hoax
or not. Pami would tell me. She would wait for him on her back porch; he would
close McFly's and park in Safe Harbor Park and walk up the hill - then they would
play house until daybreak. Then it started that after the kids left for school, Brett
would go down to the house until he went to work, or until they came home from
school. They (Lancaster and Conestoga Community) kept badgering me
with this Brett and Pami thing. When I would leave the Pflumm's house at night,
Brett would pass me on Main Street headed to their house. They would all play
these games. During the day, Pami would call me while in bed and she and Brett
would make sure I heard him in the background. Even the kids would try to irritate
me with how Brett and Pami were sleeping in the family room at night. When I
would show up for a family function, everyone would make sure that I knew Brett
was coming right after I had left. It was quite sickening. Then the situation was
that when Lizzy was old enough, Dave would take Keagan and Brett would end up
with Pami and the girls; something like that. . In early 2005 I remember
someone remote viewing me that they were setting me up with Sheryl Crow. I
warned them that it had better be true and not a game. I distinctly remember
telling them this on several occasions. I kept thinking it was CIA. I guess they were
starting to remotely train my mind for telepathy. Anyway, I would read messages
on the Sheryl Crow Fan Forum that were personal to me, but they were under
aliases. We were not communicating telepathically. It was only a friendship,
platonic. I did not know about Lance at first. It was really not intended to be
anything but friendship at first, by all parties. Then Sheryl told me that someone
tried to set us up to meet at Lilith Fair in Hershey in 1998 or 1999, whenever the
tour was there. I remember I was all ready to go to the concert and changed my
mind at the last minute. In June of 2005 Sheryl sent me a photo, via the
fan forum, of her in a blue tee shirt, she said it was the night she was leaving the
states for France in preparation for the Tour De France with Lance. That's when I
had all the pictures of Lance's kids with me. I though that Sheryl was taking the
pictures of the kids for me, at least that is what they wanted me to think. The black
ops/CIA or whoever it was kept telling me that we had to work together, but be
physically apart. I thought the work was us working on philanthropic causes. Sheryl
was doing a lot of that work back then, and I was working for years with Project
Hope. The handlers were good at setting this whole thing up. They knew
that they would eventually use Sheryl to torture me. In August of 2005 is when
Brett, Dave Pflumm, and the rest of the gang entered the picture to stop me and
Sheryl from continuing our relationship, whatever it was. A few weeks later, Lance
and Sheryl got engaged. I remember when I was in California they tricked Sheryl
into thinking I was in Conestoga. That is when they abducted her and the cult
ritualism, the brainwashing; and the sexual torture began. These people
that did all of this, probably screwed Lance up as well. I'm sure they all told him
another story about me and Sheryl. Then Brett Stabley did the same thing
with Sheryl that he did some years earlier with Pami Pflumm. The lines
get very blurred as to who is who in these games of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control.
Remember what U.S. Sponsored Mind Control is. It is the use of technology,
developed and created by U.S. Departments and Agencies, now used by who knows
who. Now, you all have my affidavit. I'm sure I could spend hours going
over this. I do still have the photos and the Sheryl Crow fan forum entries from
2005 as well as my calenders with notes and memos to support the preceding. All
secure in my safety deposit box. Now, I could be totally wrong about who I
am telepathic with. We did not start our full-time telepathy until late 2005. This is
about the same time that I was writing to Plan B, the company owned by Bratt Pitt
and Jenifer Aniston. I was trying to get someone interested in telling this horrid
nightmare. At that time Brad and Jenifer still owned the company
together. Now, there is a reason that no one will confirm just who is
telepathic with me, it would defeat the whole purpose. The confusing element to
this is that like my father, and his grandfather, I am naturally psychic. You
all keep torturing me and pushing me; and I will keep pushing for justice and telling
the truth until I am restored to whole. <hr style="width: 100%;
height: 2px;"> This whole "Sheryl Crow" thing began when I donated stock
and planned to visit the opening of her new pool in Kennett Missouri in May of 2005;
exactly the same month that I filed my first legal action in the U.S. District Court for
the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Case No. 05-2288). Exactly how and
when we became telepathic is still not resolved, although the end of 2005 is
currently the consensus. "Sheryl" told me early in our relationship that when
she was in college a "person of interest" would have her scan newspapers for
certain information (I believe she was involved in a data
mining project) for a project of some agency. Later that "person
of interest" would become involved in our mental telepathy project. The
"Alley Kat" needs to be investigated along with other night spots in downtown
Lancaster. From that point on it grew
into a model to accomplish the following by using the allure of Sheryl to attract even
more celebrities:<ul><li>Celebrities will often accommodate the public perception required
to attract persons to harass and torture.</li> <li>Celebrities provide financial stimulus and
funding of the different projects required to extort; harass; torture; steal;
etc.,.</li> <li>Celebrities will
provide a cover to any law enforcement or oversight agencies that may suspect foul
play.</li> <li>Celebrities
provide the means to grow the "hate" community against
me.</li> <li>Celebrities
provide the public perception with "if they can do it, then anyone can without
getting caught or without it being wrong".</li> <li>Celebrities can use the "Lancaster Community
and Space" to hide from paparazzi and can also get away with conduct they
normally would not by being associated in my situation.</li> <li>Mayor Rick Gray is a major supporter and
promoter of this harrasment; vandalism; theifery; and corruption
- which is the reason 1252 Fremont Street, home of William
"Lefty" Plank and his band of criminals, is protected by the Lancaster City
Police Department and Chief of Police Kieth Sadler.</li></ul> <hr>Wednesday,
February 18, 2009 11:45:15 AM Email of February 17, 2009 to Mr.
Wendall Crow Re: Sheryl Crow Subject: Meeting with Wendall
Crow<div align="justify"><table border="0"
cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr> <td style="vertical-align:
top;"> </td><td nowrap="nowrap">From:</td> <td>Stan J. Caterbone
(scaterbone@live.com) </td></tr><tr> <td
style="vertical-align: top;"> </td><td nowrap="nowrap">Sent:</td> <td>Tue February 17, 2009 12:12
PM</td></tr><tr> <td style="vertical-align:
top;"> </td><td nowrap="nowrap">Bcc:
</td> <td> Field Office
FBI (philadelphia@fbi.gov); Detective Michael Landis (landism@co.lancaster.pa.us);
City of Lancaster Bureau of Police (city_police@police.co.lancaster.pa.us);
mtciidd@aol.com; Steve Caterbne (stevecaterbone@yahoo.com);
farina@co.lancaster.pa.us (farina@co.lancaster.pa.us); Don Totaro
(ureyp@co.lancaster.pa.us)</td></tr><tr> <td style="vertical-
align: top;"> </td><td> </td> <td><table border="0"
cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%"><tbody><tr> <td
valign="bottom" width="10"> </td> <td valign="bottom">4 attachments</td> <td
valign="bottom"> <a href="http://onecare.live.com/?
s_cid=wl_hotmailscan" target="_blank"></a></td></tr><tr> <td> </td> <td
colspan="2"><a href="javascript:;">Letter to...pdf</a> (569.7
KB), <a href="javascript:;">Letter
to...pdf</a> (70.3 KB), <a
href="javascript:;">Letter
to...PDF</a> (13.2 KB), <a
href="javascript:;">Letter
to...pdf</a> (378.6 KB)
</td></tr></tbody></table></td></tr></tbody></table><
/div>February 17, 2009 Dear Sandie:I left a message at Wendell's Office on
Sunday, February 15, 2009 and I assume you are his executive
assistant. I wanted to speak with Wendell again regarding Sheryl. I will
give you an outline of my request for information and you can pass this along to
Wendell. I have had previous conversations with Wendell back in
2006. Please email me or have Wendall send a letter to: 1250 Fremont
Street, Lancaster, PA 17603Please remind Wendell that it has been 3 going on 4 years
that I have been telepathically connected to "Sheryl Crow" and have been unable to
disconnect. Now it is unfortunate that the burden of trying to identifya and
confirm the actual identity of this person rests soley on my shoulder, however, I will
assume that it does. The pain and torture of Mind Control is described in the
research at the bottom of this email. Here are my items for
discussion: <ul> <li>The suicide of
Mr. O'brien, the friend of Sheryl's in 1994 leads me to suspect that mind control is
involved and suicide is a probable outcome for the perpetrators that I have been
suing in the courts. <a
href="http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/"
target="_blank">You can find my whistleblowing
activities on my website.</a></li> <li>I am at least the second person to allege being telepathic with
Sheryl. Mr. Kappos, who was acquited of stalking in 2003 did the
same. This article is also listed below.</li> <li>Bobby Ray Inman, former board
of directors if International Signal and Control, (ISC), the company which I was a
shareholder and whistleblower, is also linked to Mind Control Activities.
<a href="http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/"
target="_blank">You can find this on the Welcome
page of my website.</a></li> <li>If
you look on the third paragraph of the July 16, 2007 letter to the Federal Bureua of
Investigation you will find that I allege that I am telepathic with Sheryl and continue
on regarding the same.</li> <li>If you look on
the fourth paragraph of the first page of the July 12, 2007 letter to Senator Arlen
Specter you will find my request for help regarding this
matter.</li></ul><a
href="http://writ.news.findlaw.com/hilden/20041207.html"
target="_blank">Sheryl Crow's "Suitor"
and Other Celebrity Stalkers: When Do They Legally Infringe Privacy?
</a>Last Tuesday, December 14, Ambrose
Kappos - the alleged stalker of singer Sheryl Crow - was acquitted by a New York
State jury. Kappos was charged with having stalked Crow when, in
2003, he confronted her backstage at a New York performance venue, the
Hammerstein Ballroom, where she was about to sing at a benefit. She was spirited
into her limousine, but Kappos then ran up to it and cried, "I am Ambrose!" (He had
also paid a visit to Crow's father, and made calls to younger sister, in 2002, asking
to meet Crow.)Kappos
claims he was "courting" Crow and meant her no harm. But she testified she found
his visit "eerie" and it made her "alarmed" and "nervous." There is evidence Kappos
may be somewhat unbalanced: He claims to have been in
telepathic communication with Crow, because he is her "spiritual
twin," and apparently told her father and sister he bore messages from
God.Excerpts
from Sheryl Crow's BiographyThe album was shelved, and fearing that she'd let her best
opportunity slip through her fingers, Crow sank into another near-crippling
depression that lingered for nearly a year and a half. However, thanks to boyfriend
Kevin Gilbert, an engineer who'd attempted to remix her ill-fated album, Crow fell in
with a loose group of industry pros that included Gilbert, Bill Bottrell, David
Baerwald, David Ricketts, Brian MacLeod, and Dan Schwartz. Dubbed the Tuesday
Night Music Club, this collective met once a week at Bottrell's Pasadena recording
studio to drink, jam, and work out material. In this informal, collaborative setting,
Crow was able to get her creative juices flowing again, and the group agreed to
make its newest member -- the only one with a recording contract -- the focal point.
Crow and the collective
worked out enough material for an album, and with Bottrell serving as producer, she
recorded her new official debut, titled Tuesday Night Music Club in tribute. The
record was released in August 1993 and proved slow to take off. Lead single "Run
Baby Run" made little impact, and while "Leaving Las Vegas" attracted some
attention through its inclusion in the acclaimed film of the same name, it reached
only the lower half of the charts. A&M took one last shot by releasing "All I
Wanna Do," a song partly written by poet Wyn Cooper, as a single. With its breezy,
carefree outlook, "All I Wanna Do" became one of the biggest summer singles of
1994, falling just one position short of number one. Suddenly, Tuesday Night Music
Club started flying out of stores, and spawned a Top Five follow-up hit in "Strong
Enough" (plus another minor single in "Can't Cry Anymore"). Crow was a big winner
at the Grammys in early 1995, taking home honors for Best New Artist, Best Female
Rock Vocal, and Record of the Year (the latter two for "All I Wanna Do"). Her
surprising sweep pushed Tuesday Night Music Club into the realm of genuine
blockbuster, as its sales swept past the seven million mark. After close to a decade
of dues-paying, Crow was a star. Unfortunately, success came at a price. In 1994, Crow had been
invited to perform "Leaving Las Vegas" on Late Night With David Letterman. In a
brief interview segment, Letterman asked if the song was autobiographical, and
Crow offhandedly agreed that it was. In actuality, the song was mostly written by
David Baerwald, based on the book by his good friend John O'Brien (which had also
inspired the film). Having been burned by the industry already, some of the Tuesday
Night Music Club took Crow's comment as a refusal to give proper credit for their
contributions. Baerwald in particular felt betrayed, and things only got worse when
O'Brien committed suicide not long after Crow's Letterman appearance. Although
O'Brien's family stepped forward to affirm that Crow had nothing to do with the
tragedy, the rift with Baerwald was already irreparable. Some Club members bitterly
charged that Crow's role in the collaborative process was rather small, and that the
talent on display actually had little to do with her. Tragedy struck again in 1996
when Crow's ex-boyfriend, Kevin Gilbert, was found dead of autoerotic asphyxiation.
 <a
href="http://fastfinge.wordpress.com/2006/11/07/synthetic-telepathy-and-psycho-
electronic-weapon-attacks-by-100000-fbi-and-nsa-secret-spies/"
target="_blank">Mind Control and Psychotronics
Torture Techniques</a>The Pentagon and the U.S. intelligence agencies called the N.S.A. [
National Security Agency ], C.S.S. [ Central Security Service ], D.I.A.
[ DefenceIntelligence Agency ], D.A.R.P.A. [ Defense Advanced Reserch Projects
Agency ], C.I.A. [ Central Intelligence Agency ], the D.H.S. [ Department of
Homeland Security ], and the F.B.I. [ Federal Bureau of Investigation ] Cointelpro or
Counter intelligence program unit has extremely top secret technology that can pick
up the private thoughts given by individuals in the vibrations produced by the
brains electrical impulses, and that these thoughts can be broadcast by means of
microwave tranceivers, infrasound and ultrasound tranceivers, satellites, and any
other form of technology which uses electromagnetic transfer, i.e. television, radio,
the internet, and the telephone. The pentagon calls this mind reading technology SYNTHETIC
TELEPATHY, although there is nothing paranormal about it at all. The N.S.A. or
National Security Agency is a part of the U.S. Department of Defense, and a very
secretive part at that. The N.S.A. has a black budget, and is always headed by a flag
officer from one of the branches of the U.S. military. The top secret technologies available
to the U.S. military is usually thirty years or maybe even more ahead of the
technology which is available to the U.S. civilian economy. Who is to know among
the general U.S. public what the level of technological development is within the
secret laboratories of the N.S.A. and D.A.R.P.A. [ Defense Advanced Reserch Projects
Agency ]. The headquarters of the National Security Agency is located at Fort
George Meade in the U.S. state of Maryland. Today, there are microscopic computer chips based on
nanotechnology which can be inserted into a person by means of an injection,
capsule, or tooth filling, with or without the knowledge of a doctor or a pharmacist,
and these computer chips can track the implanted person by radio or microwaves.
These microscopic computer chips can also be made invisible to detection by means
of C.A.T. [ Computerized Axial Tomography ], M.R.I. [ Magnetic Resonance Imaging ],
and P.E.T. [ Positron Emission Tomography ] scans, by some means of
electromagnetic degaussing. With the latest top secret, and rapid technological
advancements available to the U.S. military intelligence agencies, the need for
microscopic computer implants in conducting synthetic telepathy against targeted
persons is obsolete by now. Rather, a system of subliminal, subconscious, wireless
microwave remote control is used today against targeted individuals suffering from
synthetic telepathy harrassment. Synthetic Telepathy is used for conducting torture
training and/or experimentation against people as red herring good cop/bad cop
or tough love acting, diversions, feints, decoys, and smokescreens, as smear
campaigns by association, as openly secret intimidation campaigns against targeted
dissidents, and as a means of espionage. Once it was believed that claims about
C.I.A. agents secretly dumping radioactive material in the slums of U.S. cities during
the 1950's as part of a research program were simply mass conspiracy theories,
until the U.S. federal government in the 1990's publicly admitted that the allegation
was true. FBI and NSA agents who are part of a secret US society are genetically
inclined sociopaths and psychopaths who work as hit men, torturers, sexual
abusers, stalkers, slanderers, and agent provocateurs involved in murders and
torture of hundreds of thousands of innocent US citizens for years and years. At the
last count there are 50,000 NSA spies who are businessmen, priests, community
leaders and in all walks of life who are SPYING and keeping tabs on pretty much all
americans. The synthetic telepathy espionage
trainees, sociopaths, sadomasochistic torturers, slanderers, experimenters, and
spies, in order to avoid developing any sympathy for their targeted victims,
deliberately avoid actually feeling the emotions of their victims by following the
squiggly EEG or Electroencephalograph lines on computer monitor screens, as well
as the silent words thought by their victims which also appear on the computer
monitor screens. Then
again, who can feel all of the emotions and thoughts which any given person has
undergone every second of their entire lifetime. The emotions and silent words of
the victims of synthetic telepathy operators can be broadcast against their will to
anyone the synthetic telepathy torturers choose to broadcast to, and they also
have the power to block or censor any emotions and words of their victims which
they do not want to be broadcast. The synthetic telepathy spies can also place their
own criminal or antisocial, negative emotions and words into their victims by means
of subliminal, subconscious, remote control microwave brainwashing
technology, and they can change the voice behind their words so as to make it
appear that it is the targeted victim and not themselves who are communicating by
means of synthetic telepathy. They can also store emotions and silently thought words onto a
supercomputer memory bank which they can rebroadcast at a later time. I believe
that the synthetic telepathy operators, although having high I.Q.'s, are predisposed
towards sociopathic behaviour because of a genetic defect or combination of
genetic defects, and that the only way they can sustain enthusiasm in their lives is
by engaging in an addictive pattern of sadomasochistic activities and fantasies. If
you do not believe that synthetic telepathy exists, then you should look at these
following web sites which reveal that part of electromagnetic psychological warfare
and mind control which today is declassified: I urge the readers to print/save this
column as well as the following link where the NSA and their PSYCHO-ELECTRONIC WEAPON ATTACKS
and SADISTIC TORTURE of hundreds of thousands of innocent american citizens
(guinea pigs and victims) is explained in detail with diagrams and technology.
Covert Operations of the U.S. National Security Agency at<a
href="http://www.mindcintrolforums.com/pro-freedom.co.uk/cov_us.html"
target="_blank">http://www.mindcintrolforums.com/pro-
freedom.co.uk/cov_us.html</a> Mind control means influencing the behaviour of an individual. And
to creating or remolding victims ersonality towards desired state. The desired
model human for the elite of the world, or, the Illuminati is: Easily teerable mass-
human without personal characteristics. A stupefied, dumbed down person. This
secures the interests of the elite of the world. So they can lead our lives through
changing times the way they want. Apparently growing out of earlier government
mind control research programs such as MKULTRA, and government suppression-of-
dissent programs such as COINTELPRO, today's mind control is covert, finely
crafted, around the clock = harassment perpetrated against citizens living in their
homes and communities. It is to be noted, that MK-ULTRA and other government
programs worked as a front for the alien mind control techniques, which are
superior. The intradimensional way of mind control using the alien technologies
ensures, hat the result is always the desired one. And undesired for all free-loving
people. Destruction of family and other relationships by way of lies, bribes, and
threats is a goal of the phase of today's mind control. The current day mind control program has been carefully
engineered so that if the target complains, their own words will instantly cause
them to be labeled as mentally ill. The mind/body symptoms of current day mind control include:
Excruciating PAIN(!) Exceptionally frequent blanking of recent memories, and
truncation of new ideas - Very unnatural inability to sleep, as if large amounts of
caffeine have been consumed. - Sudden forced awakening at precisely the same
time in the middle of the night, continuing for at least months, and right on a clock
time such as 4 am, zero minutes, zero seconds - Sudden clumsiness, which can
result in spills, spoilage of precise work, or injury - Attacks of extreme fatigue,
sometimes almost to the point of paralysis, when there is no reason for such attacks
- Frequent powerful itching without rash, and which may start as a small electric
shock - Artificial bee stings, especially while trying to get to sleep - Wildly racing
heart without any cause - Sudden overheating, without any cause - Frequent flailing
of arms and legs as you try to sleep - Fake sounds such as alarm clock going off
when it shouldn't, telephone ringing when there is no incoming call, knocking on the
door but no one is there - Voices, either very insulting, or telling you things that
indicate you are under surveillance - Vibration of body parts when trying to sleep -
High pitched tone in ears, which may change when switching electronic equipment
on or off In some cases, statements by strangers indicating they know what you had
for supper In some cases, statements by strangers indicating they can read your
thoughts - Artificial and powerful sexual stimulation - Artificial and powerful
PREVENTION of sexual stimulation .This is THE
EXTERIOR of mind control. The non-noticeable mind control is more dangerous one.
That is the manipulation of our thoughts and emotions WITHOUT our notice of
things. We think we lead our lives. But we do not. We have to wake up to take notice
on the situation. And try to change the course of history. FBI and NSA SECRET
SOCIETY imposes us the New world order using mind control.And we can`t shield
ourselves from it. Which makes us as puppets on strings.Electromagnetic Weapons
and Mind Control: from CNN's Special Assignment, about 1985, at <a href="http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/cnn-mc.htm"
face="Verdana">http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/cnn-
mc.htm</a> , by Chuck De Caro, CNN Special Assignments, and List of mind
control symptoms, in 2005 update: The convergence of the cold war history of
mind control and electromagnetic weapons with new post cold war government
neuroscience reserch programs, by Cheryl Welsh, Director, Mind Justice, 2005,
at <a
href="http://www.mindjustice.org/2005update.htm" target="_blank">http://www.mindjustice.org/2005update.htm</a><fo
nt face="Verdana">And <a
href="http://www.mindjustice.org/symptoms.htm" target="_blank">http://www.mindjustice.org/symptoms.htm</a> Also, there is an interesting article called
Brain wave technology could change lives: Imagine controlling a computer using
only your thoughts. This technology already exists in the civilian economy as a
means of playing video games, for example. See this link:<a
href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6661974/" target="_blank">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6661974/</a> The article was written by Robert Bazell,
correspondent for NBC News, and was updated at 7:31p.m., December 6, 2004.
Another web site concerned with gaining information on the electrical activity of
brainwaves, and by means of wireless technology, can be found in the Sunday, 17
November, 2002, 00:41 GMT BBC NEWS World Edition article called Remote control
brain sensor, at<a
href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/2361987.stm"
face="Verdana">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/2361987.stm</
a> MANCHURIAN CANDIDATES4
Elite Airborne commandos Return from a Special Operation in Afghanistan and
suddenly torture and murder their wives Friday, July 26, 2002 1:33 p.m. EDT FORT
BRAGG, N.C. (Reuters) - Four U.S. soldiers stationed at Fort Bragg, including three
special operations servicemen who returned home this year after tours of duty in
Afghanistan, allegedly killed their wives recently, military officials said on Friday. In
two of the cases, the oldiers killed themselves after shooting their spouses,
officials said. In the other two, the servicemen have been arrested and are facing
charges.There has been a recent series of instances where soldiers have either
committed murder or murder-suicide against their wives, said Maj. Gary Kolb, a
spokesman for the Army Special Operations Command. <a href="http://www.projectfreedom.cng1.com/esp.html"
face="Verdana">http://www.projectfreedom.cng1.com/esp.html</a
> STARGATE is one of
the many names given to the Army's classified clan of remote viewers. This project
was hidden deeply within the government for close to two decades. The work of
Harold Puthoff Ph.D., at SRI international <a
href="http://www.sri.com/index/html" target="_blank">http://www.sri.com/index/html</a> joined with the work of others at the Cognitive Science Laboratory
(<a href="http://www.lfr.org/csl" target="_blank">http://www.lfr.org/csl</a> ) helped
to supply the CIA with the framework of what was then known as Project
GRILLFRAME. By 1978 America's first remote viewers were at work. It is rumored the
cold war was responsible for the government's interest in remote viewing because
Russia had spies not dissimilar to our remote viewers. Psychic Dictatorship in the
U.S.A.Alex Constantine (1995) Another bombshell from the fecund
furnace of Feral House Press. Constantine, a political researcher in the mold of Mae
Brussell, has gathered together a well-documented survey. Bombing minds rather
than bodies is the warfare of the new millennium Funded under the euphemism of
Non-Lethal Technology, the Pentagon has developed the ability to transmit voices,
and inflict pain, madness, even death, with the push of a button. Hard to believe?
Believe it! Official sources have publicly admitted to the existence of such
technology.Topics covered: Telemetric mind
control, hearing voices, false memory hoax, E. Howard Hunt's Death Squads, The
GOP's Pink Triangle & the CIA, Johnny Carson and the SL crisis, and let's not
forget the chapter on NutraSweet as crowd control. 221 pages, PB PDU $12.95
 The term mind control
comes from former CIA director Allen Dulles.In 1953, Dulles, speaking before a
national meeting of Princeton alumni, distinguished two fronts in the then-current
battle for men's minds: a first front of mass indoctrination through censorship
and propaganda, and a second front of individual brainwashing and brain
changing. Before an audience of fellow Ivy Leaguers, Dulles skipped the usual
pieties about democracy. The same year, Dulles approved the CIA's notorious
MKULTRA project, and exempted it from normal CIA financial controls. A partial list of
aggressive promoters of this new technology includes Oak Ridge National Lab,
Sandia National Laboratories, Science Applications International orporation,
MITRE Corporation, Lawrence Livermore National Lab, and Los Alamos National
Laboratory. In 1996, the US Air Force Scientific
Advisory Board published a 14-volume study of future developments in weapons
called New World Vistas. Tucked away on page 89 of an ancillary 15th volume are
some hair-raising insights into the future 'coupling' of man and machine in a section
dealing with 'Biological Process Control'. The author refers to an 'explosion' of
knowledge in the field of neuroscience, adding, ominously: One can envision the
development of electromagnetic energy sources, the output of which can be pulsed,
shaped, and focused, that can couple with the human body in a fashion that will
allow one to prevent voluntary muscular movements, control emotions (and thus
actions), produce sleep, transmit suggestions, interfere with both short-term and
long-term memory, produce an experience set, and delete an experience set.
 Translating the words
'experience set' from military jargon into plain English, this means, simply, that they
envisage the ability to erase your life's memories and substitute a new, fictitious
set. By projecting such developments into the future, the authors of New Vistas are
camouflaging present day capabilities. A similar futuristic scenario with many
references to mind manipulation is described in The Revolution in Military Affairs
and Conflict Short of War (US Army War College, 1994). Authors Steven Metz and
James Kievit declare: Behaviour modification is a key component of peace
enforcement and The advantage of [using] directed energy systems is
deniability. The authors ask: Against whom is such deniability aimed? The direct
answer is the merican people.Edward Tilton,
President of Silent Sounds Inc., says this about S-quad in a letter dated 13
December, 1996: All schematics, however, have been classified by the US
Government and we are not allowed to reveal the exact details. we make tapes and
CDs for the German Government, even the former Soviet Union countries! All with
the permission of the US State Department, of course. The system was used
throughout Operation Desert Storm (Iraq) quite successfully. By using these computer-enhanced EEGs,
scientists can identify and isolate the brain's low-amplitude emotion signature
clusters, synthesise them and store them on another computer. In other words, by
studying the subtle characteristic brainwave patterns that occur when a subject
experiences a particular emotion, scientists have been able to identify the
concomitant brainwave pattern and can now duplicate it. These clusters are then
placed on the Silent Sound carrier frequencies and will silently trigger the
occurrence of the same basic emotion in another human being! Microwaves can
also alter the permeability of the body's blood-brain barrier,14 which can
synergistically increase the effects of drugs, as the military is well aware. Using
relatively low-level RFR, it may be possible to sensitise large military groups to
extremely dispersed amounts of biological or chemical agents to which the
unirradiated population would be immune.15 Sound can be transmitted even
easier through the use of implants - cochlear implants, implants that send electrical
signals into the fluid of the inner ear, or implants that transmit sound vibrations via
bone conduction, such as the cases of dental fillings picking up audible radio
signals.The stimoceiver, invented by Dr. Jose
Delgado, consists of wires running from strategic points in the brain to a radio
receiver/transmitter located entirely under the skin. Through this device, Delgado
was able to stimulate raw emotions such as arousal, anxiety, and aggression with
the turn of a knob. Of course, secret research by the US Government into
microwaves and synthetic telepathy has moved on considerably since the end of
the Cold War secret microwave radiation can be used to induce in unsuspecting
victims: Headache, fatigue, perspiring, dizziness, menstrual disorders,
irritability, agitation, tension, drowsiness, sleeplessness, depression, anxiety,
forgetfulness, and the lack of concentration. Naval Research Lab Attempts To Meld
Neurons And Chips: Studies May Produce Army of 'Zombies.' Future battles could be
waged with genetically engineered organisms, such as rodents, whose minds are
controlled by computer chips engineered with living brain cells. The research,
called Hippo-campal Neuron Patterning, grows live neurons on computer chips.
This technology that alters neurons could potentially be used on people to create
zombie armies, Lawrence Korb, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, said.
See also National Security Agency in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Agency"
face="Verdana">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Agency</sp
an></a> Central Security Service in
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Security_Service"
face="Verdana">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Security_Service</spa
n></a> ECHELON in
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECHELON"
face="Verdana">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECHELON</a> ,Defense Intelligence
Agency in <a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_Intelligence_Agency"
face="Verdana">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_Intelligence_Agency</a> , and Defense Advanced Research Projects
Agency in <a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_Advanced_Research_Projects_Agency"
target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_Advanced_Research_Projects_
Agency</a> The following links explain secret MKULTRA
and COINTELPRO programs of FBI, CIA and NSA agencies.<a
href="http://thirdworldtraveler.com/FBI/FBI_watch.html"
face="Verdana">http://thirdworldtraveler.com/FBI/FBI_watch.html<
/a> <a
href="http://thirdworldtraveler.com/NSA/NSA_page.html" target="_blank">http://thirdworldtraveler.com/NSA/NSA_page.html</a><a href="http://thirdworldtraveler.com/CIA/CIA_ThirdWorld.html"
face="Verdana">http://thirdworldtraveler.com/CIA/CIA_ThirdWorld.html</a>
 This entry was posted on
November 7, 2006 at 10:25 am and is filed under <a title="View all posts in
humour" href="http://wordpress.com/tag/humour/" target="_blank">humour</a>, <a
title="View all posts in spam" href="http://wordpress.com/tag/spam/"
target="_blank">spam</a>.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the <a
electronic-weapon-attacks-by-100000-fbi-and-nsa-secret-spies/feed/"
target="_blank">RSS 2.0</a> feed. You can <a
electronic-weapon-attacks-by-100000-fbi-and-nsa-secret-spies/#respond"
target="_blank">leave a response</a>, or <a
electronic-weapon-attacks-by-100000-fbi-and-nsa-secret-spies/trackback/"
target="_blank">trackback</a> from your own site.
_______________________________________________________________________
___________________ Stan J. Caterbone Advanced Media
Group <a href="http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/"
face="Verdana">www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com</a> <
hr>July 4, 2008 <address> Mr. Wendell
Crow</address>Crow, Reynolds, Shetley & McVey,
LLP<address>308 First Street P.O. Box 189 Kennett, MO 63857-
0189</address>Re: U.S. Third Cir. No. 07-4474 Brief and Sheryl
CrowFor
Your Professional CourtesyDear Mr. Crow: On July 2, 2008 I had personally filed the
attached brief in the Clerks Office of the United States Third Circuit Court of
Appeals in CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., (U.S. District Court Case
No. 05-cv-2288. Attached is an electronic copy of the brief that I filed, for your
convenience. You may view the document online at: www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/gpage16.html</f
ont> You will find
reference to your daughter, Sheryl, on pages 52; 61; 63; 66; 67; and 70. Attached
you will also find a document of my phone records with calls to your office and or
home on September 5, 2005; March 31, 2006. I also have phone records with calls
to Kennett, MO on the following dates: April 26, 2006; March 28, 2006; March 30,
2006; April 26, 2006; March 31, 2006; May 1, 2006; and May 4, 2006. These may or
not be all of the calls to Kennett, MO. I did not find others in my records search that I
currently have in my possession.Attached you will find an electronic mail
communication from Jan McElwrath, Director of the Kennett Chamber of Commerce
regarding the issuance and donation of 1,000 shares of stock of Advanced Media
Group for the construction of Scouts Trail on or about July 5,
2005.As you may or not be aware, I visited
Kennett, MO on the dates of July 22, 2005 to July 25, 2005 to visit the Sheryl Crow
Aquatic Center and the site of Scouts Trail; of which I was very impressed. I had also
filed a brief for my chapter 11-bankruptcy reorganization from the Kennett, MO Post
Office on July 25, 2005. Sheryl and Lance were completing the final ceremonies for
the 2005 Tour De France and at no time had I visited or attempted to visit or locate
any addresses of you and or your family. I was merely on my way to Santa Barbara,
California and wanted to visit the new Sheryl Crow Aquatic Center. This is a matter
of record. Sincerely, <address>Stan J. Caterbone, Pro
Se</address> <address>Advanced Media Group</address> <address>www.amgglobalentertainmentroup.com</address
> <hr>July 12, 2007 <address>Arlen Specter</address> <address>United States
Senate</address>Washington, DC 20510-
3802</address>Re: Letter of June 15,
face="Verdana"> Dear Mr.
Specter: I appreciate your letter of June
15, 2007 and the future of the Federal Courthouse in Lancaster County. I dont think
that there is anything more important than the integrity of our judicial system. As
you are aware, I am following the Attorney General controversy and would hope that
your committee is successful in restoring the tradition of respect and integrity into
that institution. I dont see how our great country can function with respect without
that happening. I would hope that Attorney General Gonzales takes the high road
and resigns in the very near future, for the greater good. Unfortunately, I have some personal and business issues that I
consider important enough for me to seek your help, as being one of my
representatives to the United States Senate. First of all, I received your letter
yesterday, July 11, 2007. It was held in the mail system or was stolen for almost a
full 30 days. I have had so many complaints regarding the same that I filed a
complaint with the United States Postal Inspector. They had written me but I never
did receive the follow-up to the investigation as the letter promise. I am attaching a
copy of the letter with the hopes that you could follow-up and make certain that my
complaint is not being subverted. If
you are not aware, I have a Federal Whistle-Blowing and Federal False Claims Act
case that I need to file against the United States Attorney General, as required by
law. This case involves the former Department of Defense contractor International
Signal & Control, Plc, (ISC) formerly of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. Unfortunately, I
also have an unprecedented case of obstruction of justice that surrounds that case,
and I am evaluating the merits of waiting until your subcommittee finds a resolution
to U.S. Attorney General controversy before I file my action in the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. I am certain that any filing
before would only be subject to further misconduct. My cases now before the United
States District Courts and the various Courts of the Commonwealth have been
subject to an unprecedented array of judicial misconduct. However, I realize that
you do not have the authority or the jurisdiction to intervene, so I am
told.There is a problem that I must
bring to your attention in the hopes that you would be able to at least refer me to
the appropriate committees or agency. For approximately the past 19 months I have
had the ability to communicate telepathically. I have spent much time researching
this ability through the various intelligence agencies declassified documents. My
problem is that I am connected 24/7 with a person that is compromising my
interests and my intellectual property at a time when I am litigating civil and
criminal proceedings. My business interests are also greatly compromised. I do not
know how I became telepathic, or if I was trained without my knowledge
and or consent. I need to seek help in trying to disconnect. The person that is
connected to me subjects me to a brutal array of mental and psychological
abuse.I firmly believe that they are
being used as a medium for this purpose. I have waited 20 years to resolve my
issues in a Court of Law, and this is not a good time for this ability to assert itself,
and of course it is very suspect considering my Federal False Claims Act allegations.
Unfortunately, I have had personal dealings with the Department of Advanced
Research Projects (DARPA) that dates back to 1990 when I had contracts with the
National Institute of Standards and Technology and DARPA. I know that they study
and research paranormal activities and technologies, including remote channeling.
My Whistle-Blowing activities and my knowledge of the fraud within ISC back in
1987, has put me in direct scrutiny of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the
National Security Agency (NSA) due to their relationships with ISC, and of course my
very public condemnation of the fraud.In
the past few weeks I have downloaded a declassified document dump from the
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) that contained hundreds of bibliographies from the
Soviet Union dating as far back as the 1930s regarding this subject. It appears that
they have more knowledge and expertise than the United States. This brings me to
a disclosure that may or may not be concerning. Over the past several months I
have had two contacts and intimate conversation with an 80-year-old Russian
immigrant regarding my problem. She seemed to be knowledgeable of the subject
matter and made several disclosures, which may or not be
true.She said that she was a
Psychologist with a Doctorate degree and a former employee of the Pennsylvania
State University System. She also disclosed that her former husband was
imprisoned and tortured by the KGB.I
will copy Senator Diane Feinstein of California with this letter. The fact that she
serves on the Judiciary Committee with you and the fact that she is also on the
Senate Select Intelligence Committee might help me find a solution to this problem.
I would hope that you both might be able to help me find someone that can help me
disconnect from this other telepathic person, while at the same time taking any
making certain there are no National Security issues.In
another matter, I also will enclose a copy of an email from the Government
Accounting Office (GAO) pertaining a document that I am trying to locate that was
sent to me in 1987 from the GAO. I would appreciate it if you could follow-up on this
and make sure I am afforded the FOIA for this document.I
look forward to your response.Sincerely,Stan J.
Caterbone</address> <address>cc: USPS Certified
Mail</address>Enclosures Letter of June 15,
face="Verdana">May 24, 2007 Letter from
United States Postal Inspection Service</address>February 26, 2007 - Email to
DARPA</address>April 12, 2007 Email
Confirmation from CIA</address>2002 CIA Declassified
Document</address> <address>July 10, 2007 Email from The
GAO</address> <hr> July 16, 2007 <address>Federal Bureau of
Investigations</address>J. Edger Hoover Building</address>935 Pennsylvania Avenue</address>Washington, D.C. 20535-
0001</address>Philadelphia, PA</address>Re: Important MattersDear Sir or Madam: First of all, I received a personal letter from Senator Arlen Specter
on July 11, 2007. It was held in the mail system or was stolen for almost a full 30
days. I have had so many complaints regarding the same that I filed a complaint
with the United States Postal Inspector (See Attached). They had written me but I
never did receive the follow-up to the investigation as the letter promise. I am
attaching a copy of the letter with the hopes that you could followup and make
certain that my complaint is not being subverted.If you are not aware, I have a Federal Whistle-Blowing and Federal
False Claims Act case that I need to file against the United States Attorney General,
as required by law. This case involves the former Department of Defense contractor
International Signal & Control, Plc, (ISC) formerly of Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
Unfortunately, I also have an unprecedented case of obstruction of justice that
surrounds that case, and I am evaluating the merits of waiting until your
subcommittee finds a resolution to U.S. Attorney General controversy before I file
my action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
I am certain that any filing before would only be subject to further misconduct. My
cases now before the United States District Courts and the various Courts of the
Commonwealth have been subject to an unprecedented array of judicial
misconduct. However, I realize that you do not have the authority or the jurisdiction
to intervene, so I am told.For approximately the past 19 months I have had the ability to
communicate telepathically. I have spent much time researching this ability through
the various intelligence agencies declassified documents. My problem is that I am
connected 24/7 with a person (Sheryl Crow) that is compromising my interests and
my intellectual property at a time when I am litigating civil and criminal
proceedings. My business interests are also greatly
compromised. I do not know how I became telepathic, or if I was trained
without my knowledge and or consent. I need to seek help in trying to disconnect.
The person that is connected to me subjects me to a brutal array of mental and
psychological abuse. I firmly believe that they are being used as a medium for this
purpose. I have waited 20 years to resolve my issues in a Court of Law, and this is
not a good time for this ability to assert itself, and of course it is very suspect
considering my Federal False Claims Act
allegations.Unfortunately, I have had personal dealings with the
Department of Advanced Research Projects (DARPA) that dates back to 1990 when I
had contracts with the National Institute of Standards and Technology and DARPA. I
know that they study and research paranormal activities and technologies,
including remote channeling. My Whistle-Blowing activities and my knowledge of
the fraud within ISC back in 1987, has put me in direct scrutiny of the Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the National Security Agency (NSA) due to their
relationships with ISC, and of course my very public condemnation of the fraud. I
dont know if any of your agents have any experience with this type of situation, but
there are definitely National Security issues that may need to be addressed. There
are persons that can actually eaves drop on this type of communication, and I am
constantly being question on matters related to ISC, and other foreign affairs. My
knowledge of the Middle East is quite extensive, and there is always the possibility
for someone to glean information for illegitimate
reasons.In the past few weeks I have downloaded a declassified
document dump from the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) that contained hundreds
of bibliographies from the Soviet Union dating as far back as the 1930s regarding
this subject. It appears that they have more knowledge and expertise than the
United States. This brings me to a disclosure that may or may not be concerning.
Over the past se
e
al months I have had two contacts and intimate conversation with an 80-year-old
Russian immigrant regarding my problem. She seemed to be knowledgeable of the
subject matter and made several disclosures, which may or not be
true.She said that she was a Psychologist with a Doctorate
degree and a former employee of the Pennsylvania State University System. She
also disclosed that her former husband was imprisoned and tortured by the KGB.
I look forward to your
response.Sincerely,Stan J. Caterbone</address>cc: USPS Certified Mail</address>Enclosures Letter of June 15,
2007</address>May 24, 2007 Letter from United States Postal Inspection
Service</address>February 26, 2007 - Email to
DARPA</address>April 12, 2007 Email Confirmation from
CIA</address>2002 CIA Declassified
Document</address>July 10, 2007 Email from The
GAO</address> <hr> December 3, 2007 <address>R. Scott
Smith</address> <address>Chairman,
President</address> <address>And Chief Executive
Officer</address> <address>Fulton Financial
Corporation</address> <address>One Penn
Square</address> <address>P.O. Box
4887</address> <address>Lancaster, Pennsylvania
17604</address> <address> </address> <address>Re: Black
Budget Identities of the United States Government regarding Covert Activates
& Mind Control</address> <address>Rufus Fulton, Former Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer & Department of
Defense</address> <address>Caterbone v. Fulton Bank litigation Federal False
Claims Act Complaint re International Signal & Control (ISC) of Lancaster,
PA</address> Dear Mr. Smith: I
would like to bring to your attention a very dire matter that severely implicates
Fulton Bank and Fulton Financial Corporation. I would like to bring to your attention
the Rufus Fulton interview of November 21, 2007 broadcast on WGAL TV 8 News at
6. This interview disclosed National Security information for the first time regarding
his work for the Department of Defense and the Kennedy
Administration. I am suggesting that his classified
work with the Department of Defense and his present influence concerning National
Security matters is a dire conflict of interest concerning my litigation against Fulton
Bank that needs to be investigated by outside agencies and or authorities. I have
serious questions regarding the Defense Intelligence Agency and the possible
collusion with your institution. You have to understand that in July of 2005 while I
was visiting a museum on a military base in Austin Texas, I was detained by 2
agents for the Defense Intelligence Agency and questioned about my Federal case
02-5588 Caterbone v. Lancaster County Prison, et al., which Fulton Bank is a
defendant, and my whereabouts as well as my destination. They required me to
verify where I was staying, and called my brother Phil's Doctors office in Austin,
whom I was staying with, and caused his staff problems by getting them alarmed
about the situation. They were not very nice and I left them with the question "We
are all on the same team, aren't we? They left me be
on my way after reviewing my documents and my Federal civil complaint, which
included information about ISC and my allegations and Federal False Claims Act;
and demanding that I do not visit any more military bases. To my knowledge I have
had no physical contact since. The
problem is the involvement of the Department of Defense, Mr. Rufus Fultons past
affiliation and possible influence, my allegations and civil complaints against Fulton
Bank, and my telepathic abilities and remote viewing1. For some time I have been
trying to identify groups and or agencies that may have remotely trained me. I have
written to and personally visited the office of Senator Arlen
Specter2, the Federal Bureau of Investigation3, the Senate Select
Committee for Intelligence4, and corresponded with the Defense Advanced for
Research Projects Agency5, and the Central Intelligence
Agency6 with the hopes of finding some
answers.However they have proved
fruitless.See
the attached research document dated Thursday, November 29, 2007, titled THE
SHADOW GOVERNMENT: ITS IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS, by Richard J. Boylan,
Ph.D7; it is a report that identifies organizations, agencies, and
companies that are directly involved with mental telepathy and remote viewing,
most of which operate under the direction and funding of the Department of
Defense. I have just recently discovered this document on Friday, November 30,
2007 and found it most disturbing after having to watch the Rufus Fulton interview
the prior week. Pay particular attention to the items in red
highlight. Your Board of Directors and the
Securities and Exchange Commission should be and will be alerted to this discovery.
I wish you would reconsider your letter of November 14, 2007 and your position no
to meet with me personally to discuss some of these issues. I believe it will be in
your best interest to stay ahead of this information. A civil and criminal conspiracy
allegation that involves this information will have dire consequences to your major
stakeholders and your shareholders. As a courtesy I
will promise to give you until the end of this week, December 7, 2007 to review this
material and perform any due diligence that you seem worthy; and communicate a
response. After that time, I will take it upon myself to disclose this information as it
pertains to Fulton Bank and Fulton Financial Corporation to the Securities and
Exchange Commission, and others that will help protect my interests and the
interests of the Advanced Media Group and my litigation v. Fulton
Bank. Respectfully, <address><fon
t face="Verdana">Advanced Media
Group</address> <address><fon
t face="Verdana">Stan J.
Caterbone</address> <address>www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com</addres
s> <address>Visit Our Blog</address> <address>Visit Our Video
Biography</address> <address>Copy to
file</address> <address>Deliver to Stephanie Carfley, Barley Snyder,
LLC</address> Footnotes<fo
nt face="Verdana"> 1 See attached research document titled On the Need for New
Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mind Invasive Technology By Carole
Smith Global Research, October 18, 2007; Journal of Psycho-Social Studies,
2003. 2 See attached letter dated July 12, 2007 from Stan
J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group to Senator Arlen Specter of the Senate Judiciary
Committee. Senator Arlen Specter was visited on May 17,
color="#cccccc" face="Verdana">See the attached letter dated July 16, 2007 from
Stan J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group to the Federal Bureau of Investigation
(FBI). The meeting at the FBI Philadelphia Field Office took place on October 24,
2007, and the FBI Harrisburg Field Office was visited on May 17,
color="#cccccc" face="Verdana">The Senate Select Intelligence Committee office
was visited on May 17, 2006 5 See attached email dated February 26, 2007 regarding mental
telepathy and mind control to the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
(DARPA).6 See the attached email confirmation from the Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA).7 See the attached research
document dated Thursday, November 29, 2007, titled THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT:
ITS IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS, by Richard J. Boylan,
Ph.D.. <hr> 
MIND CONTROL RESEARCH
 <A title="Permanent Link:

SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY and PSYCHO-ELECTRONIC WEAPON ATTACKS by 100,000 FBI
and NSA SECRET S "
electronic-weapon-attacks-by-100000-fbi-and-nsa-secret-spies/"
target=_blank>SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY and PSYCHO-ELECTRONIC WEAPON
ATTACKS </A>
 
Just ran across this interesting bit of
crazyness this morning; thought I'd share:
SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY and PSYCHO-
ELECTRONIC WEAPON ATTACKS on INNOCENT US CITIZENS by a combined 100,000
FBI and NSA PSYCHOPATHIC SECRET SOCIETY SPIES in AMERICA. FBI and NSA
PSYCHOPATHS are conducting these NON-CONSENSUAL SECRET, ILLEGAL, SADISTIC,
PERVERTED and PSYCHOPATHIC SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY EXPERIMENTS and PSYCHO-
ELECTRONIC WEAPON ATTACKS on hundreds of thousands of innocent american
citizens.
The Pentagon and the U.S. intelligence
agencies called the N.S.A. [ National Security Agency ], C.S.S. [Central Security
Service], D.I.A. [DefenceIntelligence Agency], D.A.R.P.A. [Defense Advanced Reserch
Projects Agency], C.I.A. [Central Intelligence Agency], the D.H.S. [ Department of
Homeland Security], and the F.B.I. [Federal Bureau of Investigation] Cointelpro or
Counter intelligence program unit has extremely top secret technology that can pick
up the private thoughts given by individuals in the vibrations produced by the
brains electrical impulses, and that these thoughts can be broadcast by means of
microwave tranceivers, infrasound and ultrasound tranceivers, satellites, and any
other form of technology which uses electromagnetic transfer, i.e. television, radio,
the internet, and the telephone. The pentagon calls this mind reading technology
SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY, although there is nothing paranormal about it at all. The
N.S.A. or National Security Agency is a part of the U.S. Department of Defense, and
a very secretive part at that. The N.S.A. has a black budget, and is always headed
by a flag officer from one of the branches of the U.S. military. 
The top secret technologies available to
the U.S. military is usually thirty years or maybe even more ahead of the technology
which is available to the U.S. civilian economy. Who is to know among the general
U.S. public what the level of technological development is within the secret
laboratories of the N.S.A. and D.A.R.P.A. [ Defense Advanced Reserch Projects
Agency ]. The headquarters of the National Security Agency is located at Fort
George Meade in the U.S. state of Maryland. 
Today, there are microscopic computer
chips based on nanotechnology which can be inserted into a person by means of an
injection, capsule, or tooth filling, with or without the knowledge of a doctor or a
pharmacist, and these computer chips can track the implanted person by radio or
microwaves. These microscopic computer chips can also be made invisible to
detection by means of C.A.T. [ Computerized Axial Tomography ], M.R.I. [ Magnetic
Resonance Imaging ], and P.E.T. [ Positron Emission Tomography ] scans, by some
means of electromagnetic degaussing. With the latest top secret, and rapid
technological advancements available to the U.S. military intelligence agencies, the
need for microscopic computer implants in conducting synthetic telepathy against
targeted persons is obsolete by now. Rather, a system of subliminal, subconscious,
wireless microwave remote control is used today against targeted individuals
suffering from synthetic telepathy harrassment. Synthetic Telepathy is used for
conducting torture training and/or experimentation against people as red herring
good cop/bad cop or tough love acting, diversions, feints, decoys, and
smokescreens, as smear campaigns by association, as openly secret intimidation
campaigns against targeted dissidents, and as a means of espionage. Once it was
believed that claims about C.I.A. agents secretly dumping radioactive material in
the slums of U.S. cities during the 1950's as part of a research program were simply
mass conspiracy theories, until the U.S. federal government in the 1990's publicly
admitted that the allegation was true. FBI and NSA agents who are part of a secret
US society are genetically inclined sociopaths and psychopaths who work as hit
men, torturers, sexual abusers, stalkers, slanderers, and agent provocateurs
involved in murders and torture of hundreds of thousands of innocent US citizens for
years and years. At the last count there are 50,000 NSA spies who are businessmen,
priests, community leaders and in all walks of life who are SPYING and keeping tabs
on pretty much all americans. The synthetic telepathy espionage trainees,
sociopaths, sadomasochistic torturers, slanderers, experimenters, and spies, in
order to avoid developing any sympathy for their targeted victims, deliberately
avoid actually feeling the emotions of their victims by following the squiggly EEG or
Electroencephalograph lines on computer monitor screens, as well as the silent
words thought by their victims which also appear on the computer monitor screens.

Then again, who can feel all of the
emotions and thoughts which any given person has undergone every second of
their entire lifetime. The emotions and silent words of the victims of synthetic
telepathy operators can be broadcast against their will to anyone the
synthetic telepathy torturers choose to broadcast to, and they also have the
power to block or censor any emotions and words of their victims which they do not
want to be broadcast. The synthetic telepathy spies can also place their own
criminal or antisocial, negative emotions and words into their victims by means of
subliminal, subconscious, remote control microwave brainwashing
technology, and they can change the voice behind their words so as to make it
appear that it is the targeted victim and not themselves who are communicating by
means of synthetic telepathy. They can also store emotions and silently thought
words onto a supercomputer memory bank which they can rebroadcast at a later
time. I believe that the synthetic telepathy operators, although having high I.Q.'s,
are predisposed towards sociopathic behaviour because of a genetic defect or
combination of genetic defects, and that the only way they can sustain enthusiasm
in their lives is by engaging in an addictive pattern of sadomasochistic activities and
fantasies. If you do not believe that synthetic telepathy exists, then you should look
at these following web sites which reveal that part of electromagnetic psychological
warfare and mind control which today is declassified: I urge the readers to
print/save this column as well as the following link where the NSA and their
PSYCHO-ELECTRONIC WEAPON ATTACKS and SADISTIC TORTURE of hundreds of
thousands of innocent american citizens (guinea pigs and victims) is explained in
detail with diagrams and technology. Covert Operations of the U.S. National
Security Agency at
<A href="http://www.mindcintrolforums.com/pro-
freedom.co.uk/cov_us.html">http://www.mindcintrolforums.com/pro-
freedom.co.uk/cov_us.html</A>
Mind control means influencing the
behaviour of an individual. And to creating or remolding victims ersonality
towards desired state. The desired model human for the elite of the world, or, the
Illuminati is: Easily teerable mass-human without personal characteristics. A
stupefied, dumbed down person. This secures the interests of the elite of the world.
So they can lead our lives through changing times the way they want. Apparently
growing out of earlier government mind control research programs such as
MKULTRA, and government suppression-of-dissent programs such as COINTELPRO,
today's mind control is covert, finely crafted, around the clock = harassment
perpetrated against citizens living in their homes and communities. It is to be noted,
that MK-ULTRA and other government programs worked as a front for the alien
mind control techniques, which are superior. The intradimensional way of mind
control using the alien technologies ensures, hat the result is always the desired
one. And undesired for all free-loving people. Destruction of family and other
relationships by way of lies, bribes, and threats is a goal of the phase of today's
mind control. The current day mind control program has been carefully engineered
so that if the target complains, their own words will instantly cause them to be
labeled as mentally ill. 
The mind/body symptoms of current day
mind control include: Excruciating PAIN(!) Exceptionally frequent blanking of recent
memories, and truncation of new ideas - Very unnatural inability to sleep, as if large
amounts of caffeine have been consumed. - Sudden forced awakening at precisely
the same time in the middle of the night, continuing for at least months, and right
on a clock time such as 4 am, zero minutes, zero seconds - Sudden clumsiness,
which can result in spills, spoilage of precise work, or injury - Attacks of extreme
fatigue, sometimes almost to the point of paralysis, when there is no reason for
such attacks - Frequent powerful itching without rash, and which may start as a
small electric shock - Artificial bee stings, especially while trying to get to sleep -
Wildly racing heart without any cause - Sudden overheating, without any cause -
Frequent flailing of arms and legs as you try to sleep - Fake sounds such as alarm
clock going off when it shouldn't, telephone ringing when there is no incoming call,
knocking on the door but no one is there - Voices, either very insulting, or telling
you things that indicate you are under surveillance - Vibration of body parts when
trying to sleep - High pitched tone in ears, which may change when switching
electronic equipment on or off In some cases, statements by strangers indicating
they know what you had for supper In some cases, statements by strangers
indicating they can read your thoughts - Artificial and powerful sexual stimulation -
Artificial and powerful PREVENTION of sexual stimulation .
 This is THE EXTERIOR of mind
control. The non-noticeable mind control is more dangerous one. That is the
manipulation of our thoughts and emotions WITHOUT our notice of things. We think
we lead our lives. But we do not. We have to wake up to take notice on the
situation. And try to change the course of history. FBI and NSA SECRET SOCIETY
imposes us the New world order using mind control.And we can`t shield ourselves
from it. Which makes us as puppets on strings.Electromagnetic Weapons and Mind
Control: from CNN's Special Assignment, about 1985, at <A
href="http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/cnn-mc.htm"
target=_blank>http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/cnn-
mc.htm</A> , by Chuck De Caro, CNN Special
Assignments, and List of mind control symptoms, in 2005 update: The
convergence of the cold war history of mind control and electromagnetic weapons
with new post cold war government neuroscience reserch programs, by Cheryl
Welsh, Director, Mind Justice, 2005, at 
<A
href="http://www.mindjustice.org/2005update.htm">http://www.mindjustice.org/20
05update.htm</A>
And
<A href="http://www.mindjustice.org/symptoms.htm">http://www.mindjustice.org/symptoms.htm</A>
Also, there is an interesting article called
Brain wave technology could change lives: Imagine controlling a computer using
only your thoughts. This technology already exists in the civilian economy as a
means of playing video games, for example. See this link:
href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6661974/">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/666
1974/</A> The article was written by Robert
Bazell, correspondent for NBC News, and was updated at 7:31p.m., December 6,
2004. Another web site concerned with gaining information on the electrical activity
of brainwaves, and by means of wireless technology, can be found in the Sunday,
17 November, 2002, 00:41 GMT BBC NEWS World Edition article called Remote
control brain sensor, at
<A href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/2361987.stm"
face=Verdana>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/2361987.stm</A> 
MANCHURIAN
CANDIDATES
4 Elite Airborne commandos Return from
a Special Operation in Afghanistan and suddenly torture and murder their wives
Friday, July 26, 2002 1:33 p.m. EDT FORT BRAGG, N.C. (Reuters) - Four U.S. soldiers
stationed at Fort Bragg, including three special operations servicemen who returned
home this year after tours of duty in Afghanistan, allegedly killed their wives
recently, military officials said on Friday. In two of the cases, the oldiers killed
themselves after shooting their spouses, officials said. In the other two, the
servicemen have been arrested and are facing charges.There has been a recent
series of instances where soldiers have either committed murder or murder-suicide
against their wives, said Maj. Gary Kolb, a spokesman for the Army Special
Operations Command.
<A href="http://www.projectfreedom.cng1.com/esp.html"
face=Verdana>http://www.projectfreedom.cng1.com/esp.html</A>STARGATE is one of the many
names given to the Army's classified clan of remote viewers. This project was
hidden deeply within the government for close to two decades. The work of Harold
Puthoff Ph.D., at SRI international <A href="http://www.sri.com/index/html"
face=Verdana>http://www.sri.com/index/html</A>
joined with the work of others at the Cognitive Science Laboratory (<A
href="http://www.lfr.org/csl" target=_blank>http://www.lfr.org/csl</A> ) helped
to supply the CIA with the framework of what was then known as Project
GRILLFRAME. By 1978 America's first remote viewers were at work. It is rumored the
cold war was responsible for the government's interest in remote viewing because
Russia had spies not dissimilar to our remote viewers.
Psychic Dictatorship in the
U.S.A.
Alex Constantine
(1995) Another bombshell from the fecund
furnace of Feral House Press. Constantine, a political researcher in the mold of Mae
Brussell, has gathered together a well-documented survey. Bombing minds rather
than bodies is the warfare of the new millennium Funded under the euphemism of
Non-Lethal Technology, the Pentagon has developed the ability to transmit voices,
and inflict pain, madness, even death, with the push of a button. Hard to believe?
Believe it! Official sources have publicly admitted to the existence of such
technology.
Topics covered: Telemetric mind control,
hearing voices, false memory hoax, E. Howard Hunt's Death Squads, The GOP's Pink
Triangle & the CIA, Johnny Carson and the SL crisis, and let's not forget the
chapter on NutraSweet as crowd control. 221 pages, PB PDU $12.95 
The term mind control comes from
former CIA director Allen Dulles.In 1953, Dulles, speaking before a national meeting
of Princeton alumni, distinguished two fronts in the then-current battle for men's
minds: a first front of mass indoctrination through censorship and propaganda,
and a second front of individual brainwashing and brain changing. Before an
audience of fellow Ivy Leaguers, Dulles skipped the usual pieties about democracy.
The same year, Dulles approved the CIA's notorious MKULTRA project, and
exempted it from normal CIA financial controls. A partial list of aggressive promoters
of this new technology includes Oak Ridge National Lab, Sandia National
Laboratories, Science Applications International orporation, MITRE
Corporation, Lawrence Livermore National Lab, and Los Alamos National Laboratory.

In 1996, the US Air Force Scientific
Advisory Board published a 14-volume study of future developments in weapons
called New World Vistas. Tucked away on page 89 of an ancillary 15th volume are
some hair-raising insights into the future 'coupling' of man and machine in a section
dealing with 'Biological Process Control'. The author refers to an 'explosion' of
knowledge in the field of neuroscience, adding, ominously: One can envision the
development of electromagnetic energy sources, the output of which can be pulsed,
shaped, and focused, that can couple with the human body in a fashion that will
allow one to prevent voluntary muscular movements, control emotions (and thus
actions), produce sleep, transmit suggestions, interfere with both short-term and
long-term memory, produce an experience set, and delete an experience set.

Translating the words 'experience set' from
military jargon into plain English, this means, simply, that they envisage the ability
to erase your life's memories and substitute a new, fictitious set. By projecting such
developments into the future, the authors of New Vistas are camouflaging present
day capabilities. A similar futuristic scenario with many references to mind
manipulation is described in The Revolution in Military Affairs and Conflict Short of
War (US Army War College, 1994). Authors Steven Metz and James Kievit declare:
Behaviour modification is a key component of peace enforcement and The
advantage of [using] directed energy systems is deniability. The authors ask:
Against whom is such deniability aimed? The direct answer is the merican
people.
Edward Tilton, President of Silent Sounds
Inc., says this about S-quad in a letter dated 13 December, 1996: All schematics,
however, have been classified by the US Government and we are not allowed to
reveal the exact details. we make tapes and CDs for the German Government, even
the former Soviet Union countries! All with the permission of the US State
Department, of course. The system was used throughout Operation Desert Storm
(Iraq) quite successfully.
By using these computer-enhanced EEGs,
scientists can identify and isolate the brain's low-amplitude emotion signature
clusters, synthesise them and store them on another computer. In other words, by
studying the subtle characteristic brainwave patterns that occur when a subject
experiences a particular emotion, scientists have been able to identify the
concomitant brainwave pattern and can now duplicate it. These clusters are then
placed on the Silent Sound carrier frequencies and will silently trigger the
occurrence of the same basic emotion in another human being! Microwaves can
also alter the permeability of the body's blood-brain barrier,14 which can
synergistically increase the effects of drugs, as the military is well aware. Using
relatively low-level RFR, it may be possible to sensitise large military groups to
extremely dispersed amounts of biological or chemical agents to which the
unirradiated population would be immune.15 Sound can be transmitted even
easier through the use of implants - cochlear implants, implants that send electrical
signals into the fluid of the inner ear, or implants that transmit sound vibrations via
bone conduction, such as the cases of dental fillings picking up audible radio
signals.
The stimoceiver, invented by Dr. Jose
Delgado, consists of wires running from strategic points in the brain to a radio
receiver/transmitter located entirely under the skin. Through this device, Delgado
was able to stimulate raw emotions such as arousal, anxiety, and aggression with
the turn of a knob. Of course, secret research by the US Government into
microwaves and synthetic telepathy has moved on considerably since the end of
the Cold War secret microwave radiation can be used to induce in unsuspecting
victims: Headache, fatigue, perspiring, dizziness, menstrual disorders,
irritability, agitation, tension, drowsiness, sleeplessness, depression, anxiety,
forgetfulness, and the lack of concentration. Naval Research Lab Attempts To Meld
Neurons And Chips: Studies May Produce Army of 'Zombies.' Future battles could be
waged with genetically engineered organisms, such as rodents, whose minds are
controlled by computer chips engineered with living brain cells. The research,
called Hippo-campal Neuron Patterning, grows live neurons on computer chips.
This technology that alters neurons could potentially be used on people to create
zombie armies, Lawrence Korb, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, said.
See also National Security Agency in
<A href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Agency"
face=Verdana>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Agency</A>
 , Central Security Service in
<A href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Security_Service"
face=Verdana>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Security_Service</A>
 , ECHELON in 
<A href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECHELON"
face=Verdana>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECHELON</A> , Defense Intelligence Agency in 
<A
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_Intelligence_Agency"
face=Verdana>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_Intelligence_Agency</
A> , and Defense Advanced Research

Projects Agency in <A
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_Advanced_Research_Projects_Agency"
face=Verdana>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_Advanced_Research_Projects_A
gency</A> 
The following links explain secret MKULTRA
and COINTELPRO programs of FBI, CIA and NSA agencies. 
<A href="http://thirdworldtraveler.com/FBI/FBI_watch.html"
face=Verdana>http://thirdworldtraveler.com/FBI/FBI_watch.html</A><FO
NT face=Verdana> 
href="http://thirdworldtraveler.com/NSA/NSA_page.html">http://thirdworldtraveler.c
om/NSA/NSA_page.html</A>
href="http://thirdworldtraveler.com/CIA/CIA_ThirdWorld.html">http://thirdworldtrave
ler.com/CIA/CIA_ThirdWorld.html</A>
This entry was posted on November 7,
2006 at 10:25 am and is filed under <A title="View all posts in humour"
href="http://wordpress.com/tag/humour/" target=_blank>humour</A>, <A
title="View all posts in spam" href="http://wordpress.com/tag/spam/"
target=_blank>spam</A>.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the <A
electronic-weapon-attacks-by-100000-fbi-and-nsa-secret-spies/feed/"
target=_blank>RSS 2.0</A> feed. You can <A
electronic-weapon-attacks-by-100000-fbi-and-nsa-secret-spies/#respond"
target=_blank>leave a response</A>, or <A
electronic-weapon-attacks-by-100000-fbi-and-nsa-secret-spies/trackback/"
target=_blank>trackback</A> from your own site. 
3 Responses to SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY
and PSYCHO-ELECTRONIC WEAPON ATTACKS by 100,000 FBI and NSA
SECRET SPIES
<A href="http://fernandoarakakimiranda/"
target=_blank>fernando arakaki
miranda</A> Says: <A title=""
electronic-weapon-attacks-by-100000-fbi-and-nsa-secret-spies/#comment-3"
target=_blank>June 8, 2007 at 12:13
pm</A> 
OPINION PUBLISHES Sir I have the honor to
direct me to his distinguished person by the following reason: I Fernando Arakaki
Miranda born in the Republic of Brazil, for reasons that I do not know have been
brought by my gentleman father is Bolivia where I have been nationalized Bolivian. I
had the opportunity to travel to Japan so that I have Japanese ancestry, I was in
Japan exactly from 1de June of 1992 to August 1998. In this time interval which I
was living in Japan I was used like experiment with scientific aims with the
technology outpost, through implants of cerebral microChips, this was made against
my will, without my consent. This it implants has the capacity to gather, to keep, to
transmit the thoughts, sensations, feelings during the life of a person, this means
that I do not have freedom to think, to feel and inclusively they have placed a
device to speak to me directly as if they were a negative conscience, controlling
until my dreams, also do electromagnetic radiation to me, tortures cerebral. Also
they can see through my eyes this implants is called soul to catcher 2025, the
MICROCChips THE CAPTURADOR OF THE SOUL that is the technology cybort but
outpost that this in experimental process that is which I have been a laboratory
rabbit. Crimes against my person are trying to conceal this crime committing,
organizing groups of people so that they harass to me, bothering day and night to
me treating to silence and that this upsetting is unpunished. These cruel acts do not
have excuses. They are without God, nor law. They use the lie deceiving people with
calumnies in my against. Some of the crimes that I am being victim are: Threats,
criminal association, blackmails, insults, psychological attempt of homicide,
damages to the health, damages, discrimination, levelling, robbery, etc. These are
some of the twenty-six crimes that are using to conceal this subjugation in the city
of Santa Cruz of the Mountain range. That is which I have been and I am being used
like rabbit of Indians, so that I am studied by universities of the country by
the newness of this implants of the technology outpost, that much people ignore
and do not know the magnitude of this upsetting to I generate human in this
country. Sir as you can see deals with vejamen, lesa humanity, these classes of
injustices are sanctioned by the Organization of United Nations (O.N.U), the Human
rights throughout the world, the human being has the right to the life, the freedom,
the right to look for his happiness, exists the code nuremberg. This does not mean
that this against the science if that to the human being is due to respect in its
physical integrity, mental it does not seem that they are forgetting God and its
principles. This denunciation that I do publishes is also thinking about all victimas
that has been used and later silenced cruelly and these upsettings have been
unpunished. Sir I wait for you you include/understand my situation; I request
its collaboration to him to arrive at justice with a previous international judgment,
requesting compensation of damages with a right indemnification through the legal
routes, for but information my I number of telephone is the 776-74690 my post-
office box electronic is <A
href="mailto:nanitosan38@hotmail.com">nanitosan38@hotmail.com</A>. - -
<A href="mailto:fernacyborg@yahoo.com">fernacyborg@yahoo.com</A>
<A href="mailto:nandounico1@yahoo.es">nandounico1@yahoo.es</A> takes
leave sincerely thanked for Fernando Arakaki Miranda Note ALSO VIOLATE MY
POST-office BOXES IS ANOTHER FORM TO MAKE ME DAMAGE IS FOR THAT REASON I
NEED TO TRAVEL To ITS PAIS TO STUDY THIS IMPLANTS JAPONES and FOR THAT I
NEED VISA and AID ECONOMICA FOR the PASSAGE AIRPLANE. In order to look for
paginas in google MIND CONTROL FORUM INTRACEREBRAL IMPLANTS
ELECTRONIC ACTIVISTS BRAIN IMPLANTS WORD SOUL CATCHER 2025 THE
MICROCChips THE CAPTURADOR OF THE SOUL MY POST-office BOXES DO CRIME
INFORMATICO VIOLATING, SABOTAGE. TO LOOK FOR IN GOOGLE: FERNANDO
ARAKAKI MIRANDA
Mind Guard non profit Says: 
<A title=""
target=_blank>September 3, 2007 at 4:42
am</A> 
I thnk the big question is are people ready
to do what is needed. There are people ready to jail
the people hertzing people but ARE the people ready? 
Mind Guard nonprofit U.S.A. have alll the is
neede to deal with the problem from tracking equipment to the full plans to to the
device of desolation but people have to be willing to act!
I have not seen people ready to do the
things that must be done to this day. We are still
waiting for people to help with funding and work the problem.
<A href="mailto:mgdoers@yahoo.com">mgdoers@yahoo.com</A>
joi Says: 
target=_blank>September 6, 2007 at 2:33
am</A> 
I have been searching for others
experiencing mind attack.. These people seem to be connected with my family,and
all my neighbors. They have even contacted me through the mail and phone. this all
started for me when i met a wholistic health practitioner, since he,his family and
countless others(you say the government too)have been stalking and abusing me
for five years or more how can i get more info

<HR align=center width="100%" SIZE=2>


From: humanrights@cchr.org To:
amgroup01@msn.com Subject: Re: WHO IS DOING THIS TO ME? Date:
Sun, 18 May 2008 18:48:31 -0700
Dear Stan: Thanks for keeping me
updated. Sincerely, Lorita O'Leary
----- Original Message ----- 
<ADDRESS>From: <A title=amgroup01@msn.com
href="mailto:amgroup01@msn.com">Stan
Caterbone</A> </ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>To: <A title=humanrights@cchr.org
href="mailto:humanrights@cchr.org">humanrights@cchr.org</A>
</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Cc: <A
title=amgauctions@comcast.net
href="mailto:amgauctions@comcast.net">amgauctions@comcast.net</A>
</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2008 12:59
AM</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Subject: FW: WHO IS DOING THIS TO ME?
</ADDRESS>
May 18, 2008 To: Lorita
O'Leary, Citizens Commission on Human Rights Re: Mind Control
Problems Dear Lorita, Just wanted to check in and give you
an update. My time is now occupied with my major case tied up in the U.S.
Third Circuit Court of Appeals. The CCHR Complaint form is still on my To-Do
List. Hopefully soon. Always, Stan J.
Caterbone Advanced Media Group


Subject: How They Do This To
Me
 
From: <A
href="mailto:amgroup01@msn.com">amgroup01@msn.com</A> 
To: <A
href="mailto:bstabley@aol.com">bstabley@aol.com</A>;
beyyerdd@aol.com; jbuckwalter@lnpnews.com; maria.caterbone@kingpharm.com;
mtciidd@aol.com; mhalc@supernet.com;
gsmart@lnpnews.com 
CC: a<A
href="mailto:agauctions@comcast.net">gauctions@comcast.net</A>;
lisa_owings@judiciary-rep.senate.gov; rodanast@rodanast.com;
amazingone35@aol.com; jkarpathios@comcast.net; askdoj@usdoj.gov; <A
href="mailto:lawfirm@clgw.net">lawfirm@clgw.net</A>
<ADDRESS>Subject: WHO IS DOING THIS TO ME?
 Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 03:19:47
-0400</ADDRESS>
On May 16, 2008, at 1:59 PM, Stan
Caterbone wrote:
May 16, 2008
Tome, 
 I know that I am the victim of this
technology that both Neurobotics claims and that Carole Smith has
researched regarding invasive mind control. I have some of my research
posted on my research blog <A
href="http://www.advancedmediagroupresearch.wordpress.com/"
face=Verdana>www.advancedmediagroupresearch.wordpress.com</A> . 

<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%">
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD>
<DIV>
The peering into one's thoughts and ideas I can
live with, however the pain and torture of some of this technology is very hurtful
and painful. I am trying desperately to find the source and the means of how
they deploy this on me. I try to change my location when they use it, but that
does not stop it. I was told that the perps can isolate a person with radar and
satellite, so it is hard or impossible for me to avoid.
I know sometime tonight or tomorrow they will
hit me again. They usually need to alternate the pain and pleasure so that it
reaches its full impact. You know, kind of like making sure there is always a
spectrum of highs and lows. I believe they use a technique of using the
telepathy (Sheryl Crow with Brett Stabley and Dave Pflumm?) to engage me in
hostile and harassing conversation along with some sort or electromagnetic energy
isolated on me.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
This is one of the main problems I have with writing briefs and filing court
documents. They will use this to interfere with my focus and to confuse me
while the hackers change my documents and briefs. It is very challenging,
but at least I am litigating, which is the important
thing.</DIV></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<ADDRESS> Thanks. Stan J.
Caterbone</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Advanced Media Group</ADDRESS>


Mind Control Summary The
Secrets of Mind Control Based on Three Books by Top Mind Control
Researchers
<HR align=center width="100%" color=black noShade SIZE=3>


This revealing ten-page mind control
summary contains excerpts from three landmark books: <A
href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/bluebird10pg" target=_blank>Bluebird</A> by Colin A. Ross, MD,
a leading Canadian psychiatrist; <A
href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/mindcontrollers10pg" target=_blank>Mind Controllers</A> by Dr. Armen
Victorian; and <A href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/nationbetrayed10pg"
target=_blank>A Nation Betrayed</A> by mind control survivor Carol Rutz. All three authors provide
hundreds of footnotes for their research. Of those footnotes, 80 are included in this
summary, many with links to original sources. Much of this research is based on
18,000 pages of declassified CIA documents on mind control. To order these
declassified documents in CD format directly from the government, <A
href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/mindcontrol10pg#ciadocs"
target=_blank>click here</A>. For a two-page summary of this mind control material, <A
href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/mindcontrol" target=_blank>click here</A>.

<DIV align=justify>
</DIV>
A Secret Agenda Leads to First Mind
Control Programs
Please note: the letters and numbers after
each paragraph denote the book and page from which the information given was
taken. BB stands for <A href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/bluebird10pg"
target=_blank>Bluebird</A> ; MC for <A
href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/mindcontrollers10pg" target=_blank>Mind Controllers</A>; NB for
<A href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/nationbetrayed10pg"
target=_blank>A Nation Betrayed</A>. To order these books, see our Resource List: <A
href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/resources#mindcontrol" target=_blank>www.WantToKnow.info/resources#mindcontrol</A>
 
<DIV align=justify>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 border=1>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD vAlign=top width=570>
A declassified CIA document dated
7 January 1953 <A name=_ednref1></A><A title=""
href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/mindcontrol10pg#_edn1"
target=_blank>[1]</A> with a section
heading Outline of Special H Cases describes the experimental creation of
multiple personality in two 19-year old girls by the CIA. H is used as shorthand for
hypnotic, hypnotized, or hypnotism in these documents: These subjects have
clearly demonstrated that they can pass from a fully awake state to a deep H
controlled state by telephone, by receiving written matter, or by the use of code,
signal, or words, and that control of those hypnotized can be passed from one
individual to another without great difficulty. It has also been shown by
experimentation with these girls that they can act as unwilling couriers for
information purposes. BB 32 <A
name=paperclip></A></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></DIV>
After the end of World War II, German
scientists were being held in a variety of detainment camps by the allies and
Russians. In 1946, President Truman authorized Project Paperclip <A
name=_ednref2></A><A title=""
target=_blank>[2]</A><A name=_ednref3></A><A title=""
target=_blank>[3]</A><A
target=_blank>[4]</A> to exploit German scientists for American research, and to deny
these intellectual resources to the Soviet Union. Some reports bluntly pointed out
that they were ardent Nazis. They were considered so vital to the Cold War
effort, that they would be brought into the US and Canada. Some of these experts
were accused of participating in murderous medical experiments on human subjects
at concentration camps. A 1999 report to the Senate and the House said that
between 1945 and 1955, 765 scientists, engineers, and technicians were brought
to the US under Paperclip and similar programs. <A
face=Verdana> BB 3, NB xi, xii
According to the Central Intelligence
Agencys Fact Book, <A name=_ednref6></A><A title=""
face=Verdana>[6]</A> the NSC (National
Security Council) and the CIA were established under the provisions of the National
Security Act of 1947. In December 1947, the NSC held its first meeting. James
Forrestal, the Secretary of Defense, pushed for the CIA to begin a secret war
against the Soviets. Forrestals initiative led to the execution of psychological
warfare operations (psy-ops) in Europe. CIA personnel were not opposed to working
with Nazi doctors who had proven to be proficient in breaking the mind and
rebuilding it. In some cases military bases were used to hide these covert activities.
It was decided that the communist threat was an issue that took priority over
constitutional rights. MC 1, 3, 7, 8, NB xvii 
The concept of running a secret black
project was no longer novel. In 1941, Roosevelt had decided, without consulting
Congress, that the US should proceed with the utmost secrecy to develop an atomic
bomb. Secrecy shrouded the Manhattan Project (the atomic bomb program) to the
extent that Vice President Harry Truman knew nothing about it. <A
face=Verdana>[7]</A> The project
meant that by 1947, the US Government had already gained vast experience in the
initiation of secret operations. The existence of black projects funded by black
budgets was withheld not only from the public, but also from Congress for reasons
of national security. MC 8-10
<DIV align=justify>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<A name=cia190691></A>A
declassified CIA document <A name=_ednref8></A><A title=""
size=2>[8]</A> Hypnotic
Experimentation and Research, 10 February 1954 describes a simulation of
relevance to the creation of unsuspecting assassins: Miss [whited out] was
instructed (having previously expressed a fear of firearms in any fashion) that she
would use every method at her disposal to awaken Miss [whited out] (now in a deep
hypnotic sleep). Failing this, she would pick up a pistol nearby and fire it at Miss
[whited out]. She was instructed that her rage would be so great that she would not
hesitate to kill [whited out] for failing to awaken. Miss [whited out] carried out
these suggestions to the letter including firing the (unloaded) gun at [whited out]
and then proceeded to fall into a deep sleep. Both were awakened and expressed
complete amnesia for the entire sequence. Miss [whited out] was again handed the
gun, which she refused (in an awakened state) to pick up or accept from the
operator. She expressed absolute denial that the foregoing sequence had
happened. BB 36,
37</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></DIV>
One of the areas to be investigated by the
CIA was mind control. The CIAs human behavior control program was chiefly
motivated by perceived Soviet, Chinese, and North Korean use of mind control
techniques. Under the protection of national security, many other branches of the
government also took part in the study of this area. The CIA originated its first
program in 1950 under the name BLUEBIRD, which in 1951, after Canada and
Britain had been included, was changed to ARTICHOKE. MKULTRA officially began in
1953. Technically it was closed in 1964, but some of its programs remained active
under MKSEARCH well into the 1970s. In 1973, tipped off about forthcoming
investigations, CIA Director Richard Helms ordered the destruction of any MKULTRA
records. <A name=_ednref9></A><A title=""
face=Verdana>[9]</A> MC 10,
17
Diligent use of the Freedom of Information
Act (FOIA) helps to cast light on the advances that have been made in controlling
the way people think and act. In 1977, through an FOIA request, 16,000 pages of
documents were found, held as part of the Agencys financial history. The FOIA
allows the most humble citizen to demand the disclosure of documents, although
inevitably some will be heavily censored or not released at all. That is how much of
this information has been pieced together. MC 5 NB, xvi, xvii
Inevitably, however, it is an incomplete
picture. Most of the important details were conveniently destroyed under orders of
CIA Director Helms to conceal wrongdoing. <A name=_ednref10></A><A
title="" href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/mindcontrol10pg#_edn10"
face=Verdana>[10]</A> What the mind
controllers were and are doing may be only hinted at in a memo footnote or in the
memoirs of a retired researcher. Nevertheless, there is more than enough here to
show that secret new techniques are being exploited that are no longer in the realm
of science fiction. We must all be aware of this threat, so that those who wish to
take liberties with democracy, and with our freedom to think, are deterred. MC 6, NB
xvii For more, <A
href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/mindcontrollers10pg#secret"
face=Verdana>. <A name=mkprojects></A><A
name=cia></A>
The CIA Mind Control
Projects
Project BLUEBIRD was approved by the
director of the CIA on April 20, 1950. In a 1951 memo, <A
name=_ednref11></A>
face=Verdana> Bluebird states that practical research was to be conducted to
include these specific problems:
Can we create by post-H [hypnotic] control
an action contrary to an individuals basic moral principles? 
Can we in a matter of an hour, two hours,
one day, etc., induce an H condition in an unwilling subject to such an extent that
he will perform an act for our benefit? 
Could we seize a subject and in the space
of an hour or two by post-H control have him crash an airplane, wreck a train, etc.?

Can we by H and SI techniques force a
subject to travel long distances, commit specified acts and return to us or bring
documents or materials? 
Can we guarantee total amnesia under any
and all conditions? 
Can we alter a persons personality?

Can we devise a system for making
unwilling subjects into willing agents and then transfer that control to untrained
agency agents in the field by use of codes or identifying signs? 
How can sodium A or P or any other sleep
inducing agent be best concealed in a normal or commonplace item, such as candy,
cigarettes, coffee, tea, beer, medicines? <A name=_ednref12></A><A
face=Verdana>[12]</A> NB 13, 14, BB
Officially, MKULTRA was established on 13
April 1953, at Richard Helms suggestion as ultra sensitive work. <A
face=Verdana>[13]</A> The operational
wing of MKULTRA, known as MKDELTA, had as its mission to find out how to use
chemical and biological weapon ingredients to alter the human mind. Originally
established as a supplementary funding mechanism to the ARTICHOKE project,
MKULTRA quickly grew into a mammoth undertaking that outflanked earlier mind
control initiatives. MC 69, NB 28
A memorandum from Richard Helms,
<A name=_ednref14></A><A title=""
face=Verdana>[14]</A> Acting Deputy
Director to CIA Director Allen Dulles dated 3 April 1953 and entitled Two Extremely
Sensitive Research Programs (MKULTRA and MKDELTA) includes the statement,
Even internally in CIA, as few individuals as possible should be aware of our
interest in these fields and of the identity of those who are working for us. At
present this results in ridiculous contracts which do not spell out the scope or intent
of the work. BB 125 
The memorandum below was written 10
years later to Helms, who by then had become CIA Director.
<DIV align=justify>
<TBODY>
<TR>
26 July 1963, MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of
Central Intelligence <A name=_ednref15></A><A title=""
size=2>[15]</A>
SUBJECT: Report of Inspection,
MKULTRA
It was deemed advisable to prepare
the report of the MKULTRA program in one copy only, in view of its unusual
sensitivity. Normal procedures for project approval, funding, and accounting were
waived. The program requires the services of highly specialized authorities in many
fields of natural science. The concepts involved in manipulating human behavior are
found by many people both within and outside the Agency to be distasteful and
unethical. Nevertheless, there have been major accomplishments both in research
and operational employment.
Over the ten-year life of the
program many additional avenues to the control of human behavior have been
designated under the MKULTRA charter, including radiation, electro-shock,
harassment substances, and paramilitary devices. Some MKULTRA activities raise
questions of legality implicit in the original charter. A final phase of the testing of
MKULTRA products places the rights and interests of US citizens in jeopardy. Public
disclosure of some aspects of MKULTRA activity could induce serious adverse
reaction in US public opinion.
TSD [Technical Services Division of
CIA] initiated a program for covert testing of materials on unwitting US citizens in
1955. TSD has pursued a philosophy of minimum documentation in keeping with the
high sensitivity of some of the projects. Some files contained little or no data at all.
There are just two individuals in TSD who have full substantive knowledge of the
program and most of that knowledge is unrecorded. In protecting the sensitive
nature of the American intelligence capability to manipulate human behavior, they
apply need to know doctrine to their professional associates to a maximum
degree. 
J.S. Earman, Inspector General NB 108-
113</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></DIV>
The Senate Intelligence Committee did find
some records during its investigation in 1976. <A
face=Verdana>[16]</A> However it
noted that the practice of MKULTRA was to maintain no records of the planning and
approval of test programs. Miles Copeland, a former CIA officer, said, The
congressional sub-committee which went into this got only the barest glimpse.
face=Verdana> Senator Frank Church, who led the congressional investigations of
the CIAs unlawful actions, said that the agency was a rogue elephant operating
above the law as it plotted assassinations, illegally spied on thousands of
Americans, and even drugged our own citizens in its effort to develop new weapons
for its covert arsenal. MC 13, 18, NB 38
The focal point of MKULTRA was the use of
humans as unwitting subjects [without their knowledge or consent]. The CIA
sponsored numerous experiments of this kind. Regardless of a report by the CIAs
Inspector General in 1963 recommending the termination of testing on unwitting
subjects, future CIA Director Richard Helms continued to advocate covert testing on
the grounds that we are less capable of staying up with the Soviet advances in this
field. On the subject of moral issues, Helms commented, we have no answer to
the moral issue. <A name=_ednref18></A><A title=""
face=Verdana>[18]</A> MC 18
For more, <A
href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/nationbetrayed10pg#training"
face=Verdana>.
<DIV align=justify>
<TBODY>
<TR>
The Experience of CIA Mind Control Victim
<A href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/nationbetrayed10pg"
target=_blank>Carol
Rutz</A> <A
target=_blank>[19]</A>
The CIA bought my services from
my grandfather in 1952 starting at the tender age of four. <A
size=2>[20]</A> Over the next
12 years, I was tested, trained, and used in various ways. Electroshock, drugs,
hypnosis, sensory deprivation, and other types of trauma were used to make me
compliant and split my personality [create multiple personalities for specific tasks].
Each alter or personality was created to respond to a post-hypnotic trigger, then
perform an act and not remember it later. This Manchurian Candidate program
was just one of the operational uses of the mind control scenario by the CIA. Your
hard-earned tax dollars supported this.
As a survivor of CIA programs
Bluebird/Artichoke and MKULTRA, I began my intense search to document some of
the mind control experiments that I was made part of. Through a series of FOIA
requests to various departments of the government, 48 years after I was first
experimented on, I found solid proof of my memoriesproof that was in the
government vaults of the nearly 18,000 pages of declassified documents from the
Bluebird/Artichoke and MKULTRA programs.
One of the declassified documents
size=2>[21]</A> states,
Learning studies will be instituted in which the subject will be rewarded or
punished for overall performance and reinforced in various wayswith electric
shock, etc. In other cases, drugs and psychological tricks will be used to modify
attitudes. The experimenters will be particularly interested in dissociative states
[multiple personality]. An attempt will be made to induce a number of states of this
kind, using hypnosis. The government had finally handed me the validation I had
been searching for. NB xvii,
xviii</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></DIV>
The basic premise of the book The
Manchurian Candidate <A name=_ednref22></A><A title=""
face=Verdana>[22]</A> is that a group
of American POWs in the Korean War is brainwashed while crossing through
Manchuria to freedom. They arrive back in the US amnesic for the period of
brainwashing. One of them is programmed to be an assassin. His target is a
candidate for president of the US. His handlers control him with a hypnotically
implanted trigger. BB 23
<DIV align=justify>
<TBODY>
<TR>
In an experiment described in a
document entitled SI and H experimentation <A
size=2>[23]</A> (25 September
1951), two female subjects took part in an exercise involving the planting of a
bomb. Both subjects performed perfectly and were fully amnesic for the exercise:
[Whited out] was instructed that upon awakening, she would proceed to [whited
out] room where she would wait at the desk for a telephone call. Upon receiving the
call, a person known as Jim would engage her in normal conversation. During the
course of the conversation, this individual would mention a code word. When she
heard this code word, she would pass into a SI trance state, but would not close her
eyes and remain perfectly normal and continue the telephone conversation.

 
She was told that upon conclusion
of the telephone conversation, she would carry out instructions: [Whited out] was
shown an electric timing device. She was informed that this device was a bomb, and
was then instructed how to attach and set the device. After [whited out] learned
how to set and attach the device, she was told to take the timing device which was
in a briefcase, and proceed to the ladies room. In the ladies room, she would be met
by a girl whom she had never seen who would identify herself by the code word
New York. [whited out] was then to show this individual how to attach and set the
timing device and further instructions would be given that the timing device was to
be carried in the briefcase to [whited out] room, placed in the nearest empty
electric-light plug and concealed in the bottom, left-hand drawer of [whited out]
desk, with the device set for 82 seconds and turned on. BB 37,
38</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></DIV>
The Mind Control
Doctors
In the second half of the 20th century,
mind control projects resulted in extensive political abuse of psychiatry in North
America. Many thousands of prisoners and mental patients were subjected to
unethical mind control experiments by leading psychiatrists and medical schools.
Organized academic psychiatry has never acknowledged this history. The network of
mind control doctors involved has done a great deal of harm to the field of
psychiatry and to psychiatric patients. BB, pg. K
The work of the mind control doctors did
not occur in a vacuum. The importation of Nazi doctors to the US through secret
programs like PAPERCLIP is part of the context. Mind control experimentation was
not only tolerated by medical professionals, but published in psychiatric and
medical journals. <A name=_ednref24></A><A title=""
face=Verdana>[24]</A> The climate was
permissive, supportive, and approving of mind control experimentation. BB
1
Dr. William Sweet <A
face=Verdana>[25]</A> participated in
both brain electrode implant experiments and the injection of uranium into medical
patients at Harvard University. The 925-page Final Report. Advisory Committee on
Human Radiation Experiments <A name=_ednref26></A><A title=""
face=Verdana> tells the story of radiation experiments, and their linkage to mind
control. BB 1
Martin Orne is one of the leading experts
on hypnosis of the 20th century. <A name=_ednref27></A><A title=""
face=Verdana> For about 30 years, he was the editor of The International Journal of
Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis. Dr. Orne is one of two psychiatrists
professionally still active into the late 1990s who is a documented CIA mind control
contractor (along with Dr. Louis Jolyon West). BB 121, 124
<DIV align=justify>
<TBODY>
<TR>
P. Janet asked a deeply hypnotized
female to commit several murders before a distinguished group of judges, stabbing
some victims with rubber daggers and poisoning others with sugar tablets. The
hypnotized subject did all these things without hesitation. <A
size=2>[30]</A> MC
Army doctors were actively involved in LSD
testing at least until the late 1970s. Subjects of LSD experiments included children
as young as five years old, and brain electrodes were implanted in children as
young as 11 years of age. Four of the CIAs MKULTRA Subprojects were on children.
The mind control doctors included presidents of the American Psychiatric
Association and psychiatrists who received full-page obituaries in the American
Journal of Psychiatry. Responsibility for the unethical experimentation lies first with
the individual doctors, but also collectively with the medical profession, and with
academia as a whole. BB 21
The MKULTRA contractor about whom the
most has been written is Dr. Ewen Cameron. <A
face=Verdana> At various times, Dr. Cameron was President of the American,
Canadian, and World Psychiatric Associations. He was one of four co-founders of the
World Psychiatric Association. Dr. Cameron began conducting unethical, unscientific,
and inhumane brainwashing experiments in the 1930s. Schizophrenic patients were
forced to lie naked in red light for eight hours a day for periods as long as eight
months. Another experiment involved overheating patients in an electric cage until
their body temperatures reached 102 degrees. BB 125-128
From January 1957 until September 1960,
Dr. Camerons project received $64,242.44 in CIA funds. <A
face=Verdana>[36]</A> When the CIA
stopped funding him, Cameron received $57,750 from the Canadian government to
continue his research from 1961 to 1964. <A name=_ednref37></A><A
face=Verdana> The actual number of patients on whom Cameron tried varieties of
his experimental techniques is reported as 332. <A
face=Verdana> NB 52, 53
Linda MacDonald was a victim of Dr. Ewen
Camerons unethical, destructive mind control experiments in 1963. Dr. Cameron
used a treatment which involved intensive application of three brainwashing
techniques; drug disinhibition, prolonged sleep, and prolonged psychological
isolation. These were combined with ECT [Electro Convulsive Therapy] treatments.
face=Verdana> The amount of electricity introduced into Lindas brain exceeded by
76.5 times the maximum amount recommended in the ECT Guidelines of the
American Psychiatric Association. Dr. Camerons depatterning technique resulted
in permanent and complete amnesia. Dr. Cameron proved that doctors skilled in the
right procedures can erase a subjects memory. To this day, Linda MacDonald is
unable to remember anything from her birth to 1963. As recorded by nurses in her
chart, Linda was completely disoriented. She didnt know her name, age or where
she was. She didnt recognize her children. She couldnt read, drive, cook, or use a
toilet. Not only did she not know her husband, she didnt even know what a
husband was. BB 181-183
Life changed for Linda when the Canadian
Broadcasting Corporation program, The Fifth Estate, aired a segment on Dr.
Cameron on January 17, 1984. A Vancouver newspaper ran a full-page story on
Robert Loggie, a Vancouver man who had been experimented on by Dr. Cameron.
Loggie was a plaintiff in the class action suit against the CIA for Dr. Camerons
MKULTRA experiments, which was settled out of court for $750,000, divided among
the eight plaintiffs in 1988. <A name=_ednref42></A><A title=""
face=Verdana>[42]</A> Eventually Linda
got $100,000 plus legal fees from the Canadian government. BB 187,
<DIV align=justify>
<TBODY>
<TR>
J.G. Watkins induced a soldier to strike an
officer by suggesting that the officer was a Japanese soldier. <A
size=2>[43]</A> In another
experiment, two subjects who were told to throw sulphuric acid at a laboratory
assistant (protected by glass) complied with the hypnotists commands.
target=_blank>G.H. Estabrooks is the only mind control
doctor who has publicly acknowledged the building of Manchurian Candidates. In his
book Spiritism, <A name=_ednref45></A><A title=""
face=Verdana>[45]</A> Dr. Estabrooks
describes experiments done to create multiple personality. <A
face=Verdana> In his book Hypnotism, <A name=_ednref48></A><A
face=Verdana> Dr. Estabrooks states that the creation of experimental multiple
personality for operational use in military subjects, whom he refers to as super
spies, is ethical because of the demands of war. BB 159, 162
In a 1971 article in Science Digest,
face=Verdana>[49]</A> Dr. Estabrooks
claimed to have created hypnotic couriers and counterintelligence agents for
operational use. By the 1920s not only had [clinical hypnotists] learned to apply
posthypnotic suggestion, but also to split certain complex individuals into multiple
personalities like Jeckyl-Hydes. During World War II, I worked this technique with a
vulnerable Marine lieutenant Ill call Jones. I split his personality into Jones A and
Jones B. Jones A, once a normal working Marine, became entirely different. He
talked communist doctrine and meant it. He was welcomed enthusiastically by
communist cells, and was deliberately given a dishonorable discharge by the Corps
and became a card-carrying party member. Jones B was the deeper personality,
knew all the thoughts of Jones A, was a loyal American and was imprinted to say
nothing during conscious phases. All I had to do was hypnotize the whole man, get
in touch with Jones B, the loyal American, and I had a pipeline straight into the
Communist camp. It worked beautifully. BB 167-169
Dr. Estabrooks did experiments on
children. He corresponded with FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover about using hypnosis to
interrogate juvenile delinquents. His experimentation raises the possibility that he
or other investigators might have attempted to create Manchurian Candidates in
children. Such a possibility might seem far-fetched until one considers the LSD,
biological and radiation experiments conducted on children, <A
face=Verdana> and the fact that four MKULTRA Subprojects were on children. The
deliberate creation of multiple personality in children is an explicitly stated plan in
the MKULTRA Subproject Proposal submitted for funding on May 30, 1961. BB 61,
176, 177 For more, <A
href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/bluebird10pg#doctors" target=_blank>click here</A> and <A
href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/nationbetrayed10pg#mengele"
target=_blank>here</A>.<A name=lsd></A>
LSD Tests
From 1950 until the 1970s, the CIA
collaborated closely with the US Army while conducting LSD and other chemical
tests on humans. Experiments were conducted where none of the volunteers gave
their informed consent prior to receiving LSD. There was a deliberate attempt to
deny the volunteers any information that would have permitted them to evaluate
the dangers involved. Most of the related records have been destroyed. <A
face=Verdana>[53]</A> MC 20, 21, 29,
A field test plan called for use of LSD on
foreign nationals overseas. The Surgeon General offered no medical objections to
the field experimental plan. <A name=_ednref54></A><A title=""
face=Verdana>[54]</A> Subjects for the
proposed field test were to be non-volunteer, foreign nationals. It is clear that from
the start to finish the project violated Department of Defense policies, as well as
specific procedures set for chemical or medical research. MC 33-
Frank Olson was a biological warfare
expert. He committed suicide after being given LSD hidden in liqueur by Dr. Sidney
Gottlieb, Director of MKULTRA. Olsons family determined that he committed suicide
subsequent to a bad LSD trip only after reading Nelson Rockefellers 1975 report on
the CIA, finally published 22 years after Olsens death. They were given $750,000 in
compensation by Congress. <A name=_ednref55></A><A title=""
face=Verdana>[55]</A> BB
49<A name=electronic></A><A name=implants></A>
Electronic
Implants
Jose Delgados development of the
Stimoceiver in the 1950s brought intelligence agencies ultimate dream of
controlling human behavior one step closer to reality. The Stimoceivera miniature
electrode capable of receiving and transmitting electronic signals by FM radio
could be placed within an individuals cranium. And once in place, an outside
operator could manipulate the subjects responses. Delgado demonstrated the
potential of his Stimoceivers by wiring a fully-grown bull. With the device in place,
Delgado stepped into the ring with the bull. The animal charged towards the
experimenter and then suddenly stopped, just before it reached him. The powerful
beast had been stopped with the simple action of pushing a button on a small box
held in Delgados hand. <A name=_ednref56></A><A title=""
face=Verdana>[56]</A> MC
Dr. Delgado, a neurosurgeon and professor
at Yale, <A name=_ednref57></A><A title=""
face=Verdana> received funding for brain electrode research on children and
adults. He did research in monkeys and cats, and in one paper describes the cats as
mechanical toys. He was able to control the movements of his animal and human
subjects by pushing buttons on a remote transmitter box. In 1966, Delgado asserted
that his experiments support the distasteful conclusion that motion, emotion and
behavior can be directed by electrical forces, and that humans can be controlled like
robots by push buttons. <A name=_ednref63></A><A title=""
face=Verdana> BB 88, 89, MC 147
An 11-year old boy underwent a partial
change of identity upon remote stimulation of his brain electrode: Electrical
stimulation of the superior temporal convolution induced confusion about his sexual
identity. These effects were specific, reliable, and statistically significant. For
example, the patient said, 'I was thinking whether I was a boy or a girl,' and 'Id like
to be a girl.'" After one of the stimulations the patient suddenly began to discuss his
desire to marry the male interviewer. Temporal-lobe stimulation produced in another
patient open manifestations and declarations of pleasure, accompanied by giggles
and joking with the therapist. In two adult female patients stimulation of the same
region was followed by discussion of marriage and expression of a wish to marry the
therapist. <A name=_ednref64></A><A title=""
face=Verdana>[64]</A> BB 88,
Brain electrode research was also
conducted independently at Harvard by Dr. Delgados coauthors, Drs. Vernon Mark,
Frank Ervin, and William Sweet. Mark and Ervin describe implanting brain electrodes
in a large number of patients at Harvard hospitals. A patient named Jennie was 14
years old when they put electrodes in her brain. In their book Violence and the
Brain, <A name=_ednref65></A><A title=""
face=Verdana>[65]</A> photographs
show 18-year old Julia smiling, angry, or pounding the wall depending on which
button is being pushed on the transmitter box sending signals to her brain
electrodes. The mind control doctors saw their patients as biological machines, a
view which made them sub-human, and therefore easier to abuse in mind control
experiments. BB 88-91
Dr. Robert G. Heath, <A
face=Verdana> Chairman of the Department of Psychiatry and Neurology at Tulane
University, placed brain electrodes in a young homosexual man and fitted him with
a box. A button on the box could be used to electrically stimulate an electrode
implanted in a pleasure center. During one three-our period, the patient, referred to
as B-19, stimulated himself 1,500 times. During these sessions, B-19 stimulated
himself to a point that he was experiencing an almost overwhelming euphoria and
elation, and had to be disconnected, despite his vigorous protests." <A
face=Verdana> BB 94
Dr. John Lilly describes the technique of
electrode implantation. Electrodes could be implanted in the brain without using
anesthesia. Short lengths of hypodermic needle tubing equal in length to the
thickness of the skull were quickly pounded through the scalp into the skull. These
stainless steel guides furnished passageways for the insertion of electrodes into the
brain to any desired distance and at any desired location. Because of the small size
of the sleeve guides, the scalp quickly recovered from the small hole made in it, and
the sleeve guide remained imbedded in the bone for months to years. At any time
he desired, the investigator could palpate [rub] the scalp and find the location of
each of the sleeve guides. Once one was found, he inserted a needle down through
the bone. After withdrawing the needle, the investigator placed a small sharp
electrode in the track made by the needle and pressed the electrode through the
skull and down into the substance of the brain to any desired depth. <A
face=Verdana>[70]</A> NB 62
For more, <A
href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/mindcontrollers10pg#implants"
face=Verdana> and <A
href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/bluebird10pg#implants" target=_blank>here</A>.<A
name=nonlethal></A>
Non-Lethal
Weapons
Non-lethal weapons is a broad category
which includes devices for beaming various kinds of energy at human targets in
order to temporarily incapacitate them, or to control or affect their behavior. Non-
lethal weapons research has been conducted at universities on contract to the CIA,
and has overlapped with research on hallucinogens and brain electrode implants.
BB 103
In 1991, Janet Morris, one of the main
proponents of non-lethal weapons, issued a number of papers. <A
face=Verdana>[71]</A> According one
paper, US Special Operations Command already had a portable microwave weapon.
US Special Forces can cook internal organs. <A
face=Verdana> Another concept was Infrasound using acoustic beams.
Laboratories were developing a high power, very low frequency acoustic beam
weapon projecting non-penetrating acoustic bullets. Already, some governments
have used infrasound as a means of crowd control. Very low frequency (VLF)
sound, or low frequency RF modulations can cause nausea, vomiting and abdominal
pains. Some very low frequency sound generators can cause the disruption of
human organs and, at high power levels, can crumble masonry. <A
face=Verdana> MC 176-179
Funding of these experiments began in
MKULTRA. Subproject 62 documents certain kinds of radio frequency energy have
been found to effect reversible neurological changes in chimpanzees. <A
face=Verdana>[74]</A> Subproject 54
was studying how to produce concussions from a distance using mechanical blast
waves propagated through the air. Such a concussion is always followed by
amnesia for the actual moment of the accident. It also states: The blast duration
would be in the order of a tenth of a second. Masking of a noise of this duration
should not be difficult. It would be advantageous to establish the effectiveness of
both of the above methods as a tool in brain-wash therapy. BB 103-
<DIV align=justify>
<TBODY>
<TR>
A confidential report prepared by the US Army as
early as 1969 detailed the effect an infra-sonic system would have on humans.
These effects range from disruption of nervous systems to death. <A
size=2>[75]</A> MC 199,
<A name=crowdcontrol></A>That such
weapons have been used can be in little doubt. When the deployment of Cruise
missiles at American bases in the UK was at its height, women peace campaigners
staged a series of highly publicized peaceful protests outside the perimeter wires. In
late 1985, the women in the peace camps at Greenham Common began to
experience unusual patterns of illness, ranging from severe headaches, drowsiness,
menstrual bleeding at abnormal times or after the onset of menopause, to bouts of
temporary paralysis and faulty speech coordination. Electronics Today <A
face=Verdana>[76]</A> magazine
carried out a number of measurements, and in December 1985 published their
report which concluded: Readings taken with a wide range of signal strength
meters showed marked increases in the background signal level near one of the
womens camps at a time when they claimed to be experiencing ill effects. They
noted that if the women created noise or a disturbance near the fence, the signals
rose sharply. MC 201
The evidence in hand suggests that the
technology to produce voices in the head does exist. The Department of Defense
has already acquired the technology to alter consciousness through various projects
and programs. A patent discusses methods and system for altering consciousness.
The abstract from once such program states: Researchers have devised a variety
of systems for stimulating the brain to exhibit specific brain wave rhythms and
thereby alter the state of consciousness of the individual subject. <A
face=Verdana>[77]</A> Silent subliminal
messages [were] used throughout Operation Desert Storm (Iraq) quite
successfully. <A name=_ednref78></A><A title=""
face=Verdana> MC 203, 204
<DIV align=justify>
<TBODY>
<TR>
A US State Department report suggested it was
possible to induce a heart attack in a person from a distance with radar.
By 1974, Stanford Research Institute had
developed a computer system capable of reading a persons mind by correlating the
brain waves of subjects on an electroencephalograph with specific commands.
face=Verdana>[80]</A> The concept of
mind-reading computers is no longer science fiction. Neither is their use by Big
Brotherly governments. Major Edward Dames of Psi-Tech said in April 1995 on NBCs
The Other Side program: The US government has an electronic device which could
implant thoughts in people. Dames would not comment any further. MC
The latest development in the technology
of induced fear and mind control is the cloning of the human EEG or brain waves of
any targeted victim, or indeed groups. With the use of powerful computers,
segments of human emotions which include anger, anxiety, sadness, fear,
embarrassment, jealousy, resentment, shame, and terror, have been identified and
isolated within the EEG signals as emotion signature clusters. Their relevant
frequencies and amplitudes have been measured. Then the very
frequency/amplitude cluster is synthesized and stored on another computer. Each
one of these negative emotions is separately tagged. They are then placed on the
Silent Sound carrier frequencies and could silently trigger the occurrence of the
same basic emotion in another human being. MC 205
The entire non-lethal weapon concept is
literally a <A href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/pandorasboxcv"
target=_blank>Pandoras Box</A> of unknown consequences. MC 179 For more, <A
href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/mindcontrollers10pg#nonlethal"
face=Verdana> and <A
href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/bluebird10pg#nonlethal" target=_blank>here</A>.
<HR align=center width="87%" color=#969696 noShade SIZE=2>


How to Order Government Mind
Control Records of MKULTRA & Bluebird/Artichoke <A
face=Verdana>[81]</A>
To order individual documents, go to
<A href="http://www.foia.cia.gov/sample_request_letter.asp"
face=Verdana>http://www.foia.cia.gov/sample_request_letter.asp</A><FO
NT face=Verdana>. There is no charge for the first 100 pages. To order the three CD
set containing 20,000 pages of declassified CIA mind control documents, send a
check for $30 made payable to the United States Treasurer. Send the check and a
copy of the form below to the address given:
<ADDRESS>Central Intelligence
Agency</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>FOIA and Privacy Act
Coordinator</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Washington, DC 20505</ADDRESS>
Re: Freedom of Information Act and Privacy
Act Request
This letter constitutes my formal request
for information pursuant to the provisions of the Freedom of Information and Privacy
Acts, 5 USC552. I am requesting the three-volume CD set that includes the more
than 18,000 pages of MKULTRA and Bluebird/Artichoke records, and a copy of the
shareware viewer. Enclosed is a check for $30 made payable to the United States
Treasurer. 
Sincerely,
 [Name, address, telephone number,
and date required]
Note: For free access to these documents
on an excellent Internet website, see the Black Vault Government Archive at

<A href="http://www.theblackvault.com/modules.php?
name=core&showPage=true&pageID=23"
face=Verdana>http://www.theblackvault.com/modules.php?
name=core&showPage=true&pageID=23</A>. 


To order the three books quoted in this
summary, see the mind control section of our <A
href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/resources" target=_blank>Resource List</A>. For other
reliable resources on mind control, visit our <A
href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/mindcontrolinformation" target=_blank>Mind Control Information Center</A>. We share this information as an invitation to work together for a
better world. Please join us in <A
href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/emailmk" target=_blank>spreading the word</A>, so that
we can build a critical mass of people who demand that these activities be brought
back under Congressional control. 


<HR align=left width="33%" SIZE=1>


<A name=_edn1></A><A title=""
href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/mindcontrol10pg#_ednref1"
face=Verdana> CIA MORI ID 190684, pp. 1, 4. This is a declassified CIA document
dealing with mind control. To verify the statement in the text, use the FOIA
(Freedom of Information Act) request as described on our ten-page mind control
summary at <A
face=Verdana>http://www.WantToKnow.info/mindcontrol10pg#ciadocs</A
>. You should receive the government mind control CDs
within a month of your request. Once you receive them, look up the MORI ID
number listed. For free, unlimited access to these documents, go to the Black Vault
Government Archive at <A
href="http://www.theblackvault.com/modules.php?
name=core&showPage=true&pageID=23" target=_blank>. To go directly to the CIA document quoted, for page 1, <A
href="http://www.blackvault.com/documents/mkultra/MKULTRA2/DOC_0000190684/
0000190684_0001.TIF" target=_blank>click
here</A>. For page 4, <A
here</A>. 
face=Verdana> BBC News, November 21, 2005, Project Paperclip: Dark side of the
Moon, provides details of this disturbing project, available at <A
href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/4443934.stm"
face=Verdana>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/4443934.stm
</A>. 
face=Verdana> New York Times, January 30, 2005, C.I.A. Said to Rebuff Congress on
Nazi Files, shows that the CIA continues to refuse a Congressional directive to
release documents related to this secret program of Nazi collaboration, article
<A href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/050203cianazilink"
target=_blank>available here</A> Hunt, L. Secret Agenda. The United States Government, Nazi
Scientists, and Project Paperclip, 1945 to 1990. New York: St. Martins Press, 1991.
To order this book, <A
href="http://www.campusi.com/bookFind/asp/bookFindPriceLst.asp?
prodId=0312055102" target=_blank>click
here</A>. See also Simpson, C. Blowback. The
First Full Account of Americas Recruitment of Nazis, and the Disastrous Effect on
Our Domestic and Foreign Policy. New York: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1988. To order
this book, <A
prodId=1555841066" target=_blank>click
face=Verdana> Interagency Working Group appointed to inform the appropriate
committees of the US Senate and House of the activities of the Nazi War Criminal
Records. For information on this posted on the National Archives website under the
National War Crimes Disclosure Act, <A
href="http://www.archives.gov/iwg/" target=_blank>
face=Verdana> Formerly available free, now available for purchase on amazon.com
by <A href="http://www.amazon.com/CIA-World-Factbook-2008-
Cia/dp/1602390800/ref=sr_1_2?
ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1197060351&sr=1-2"
target=_blank>clicking here</A> Vannevar Bushs memorandum to James Conant, Bush-Conant files,
Office of Scientific Research and Development, S-1, Record Group 227, National
Archives. You can request this document from the government through the FOIA
(Freedom of Information Act). For instructions on how to order this document from
the National Archives, <A href="http://www.archives.gov/foia/index.html"
target=_blank>click here</A>. For more on this subject, <A
href="http://www.nuclearfiles.org/menu/key-issues/nuclear-weapons/history/pre-
cold-war/manhattan-project/truman-and-the-bomb.htm" target=_blank>click here</A> CIA MORI ID 190691, p. 1. This is a declassified CIA document
summary at <A
>. 
You should receive the government mind
control CDs within a month of your request. Once you receive them, look up the
MORI ID number listed. For free, unlimited access to these documents, go to the
Black Vault Government Archive at <A
face=Verdana>. To go directly to the page with the CIA document quoted,
<A
here</A>.
face=Verdana>New York Times, Aug. 2, 1977, Mind-Control Studies Had Origins in
Trial of Mindszenty. This engaging article includes a concise history of mind control
projects. To view article, <A
href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/770802nytimesmkultramindcontrol"
face=Verdana>. The U.S. Department of Energy Website also has a highly revealing,
detailed report of these mind control projects and more at <A
href="http://hss.energy.gov/healthsafety/ohre/roadmap/achre/chap3_4.html"
target=_blank>http://hss.energy.gov/healthsafety/ohre/roadmap/achre/chap3_4.htm
l</A>. See also a CIA document <A
href="http://www.blackvault.com/documents/mkultra/mkultra4/DOC_0000017748/0
000017748_0030.tif" target=_blank>available
here</A>, which mentions in the lower tabs
MKULTRA and its formation in 1953.
face=Verdana> To see verification of this destruction of records on U.S. Department
of Energy's website, <A
face=Verdana> CIA MORI ID 140401, p. 6, 7. This is a declassified CIA document. To
order this document go to <A
href="http://www.foia.cia.gov/sample_request_letter.asp"
NT face=Verdana>, and follow the instructions. This document is not included in the
mind control CDs.
face=Verdana> CIA MORI ID 144700, 4/26/52, p. 3: DrugsSodium Pentathol,
sodium amytal, and barbiturates in general. Evaluation: These techniques have
been proven to be effective and they involve little risk to the subject if administered
under competent medical direction. CIA MORI ID 140394, pp. 2, 3, dated 2/25/52:
Q: Have you ever had any experience with drugs? A: Yes, many times. I worked
with doctors using sodium amytal and pentathol and have obtained hypnotic control
after the drugs were used. In fact, many times the drugs were used for the purpose
of obtaining hypnotic control. These are a declassified CIA documents dealing with
mind control. To verify the statements in the text, use the FOIA (Freedom of
Information Act) request as described on our ten-page mind control summary at
<A href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/mindcontrol10pg#ciadocs"
face=Verdana>. To go directly to the page 3 of CIA document 144700, <A
here</A>. Document 140394 is not available on
this website, though it is included now in the mind control CD set you can order at
the above link. 
face=Verdana> Memorandum from ADDP Helms to DCI Dulles, dated 3 April 1953,
Tab A, pp. 1-2 (p. 30 on CDs), CIA MORI ID 17748. This is a declassified CIA
document dealing with mind control. To verify the statement in the text, use the
FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) request as described on our ten-page mind
control summary at
 <A
target=_blank><A href="http://www.theblackvault.com/modules.php?
face=Verdana>. To go directly to the CIA document quoted (p.30), <A
000017748_0030.tif" target=_blank>click
face=Verdana> CIA MORI ID 17748, p. 30. Quote on p. 33. This is a declassified CIA
FOIA request as described on our ten-page mind control summary at <A
Government Archive at 
<A href="http://www.theblackvault.com/modules.php?
face=Verdana>. To go directly to the CIA document quoted, for page 30,
<A
face=Verdana> CIA MORI ID 17748, pp. 2, 4, 6-9. This is a declassified CIA
FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) request as described on our ten-page mind
control summary at 
<A href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/mindcontrol10pg#ciadocs"
Government Archive <A
face=Verdana>available here</A>. To go directly
to the CIA Inspector General's document: 
For page 2, <A
000017748_0002.tif" target=_blank>click
here</A>. For page 4, <A
here</A>. In addition the above CIA
document, to verify this quote and other key mind control information in a highly
revealing 1977 New York Times article available in their archives, <A
href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/770721nytimes.ciahumanbehaviorcontrol"
face=Verdana> Final Report. Book 1, Foreign and Military Intelligence. Senate Select
Committee to Study Government Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities,
94th Congress, 2nd Session, 26 April 1976, Special Report No. 94-755 (Better known
as the Church Committee Report). See Book 1, p. 406. For instructions on how to
order this document from the National Archives, <A
href="http://www.archives.gov/foia/index.html" target=_blank>click here</A>. For a related article
on George Washington University's National Security Archive website, see
<A href="http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20000817"
target=_blank>http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20000817</A><FON
T face=Verdana>. For an excellent Wikipedia article, <A
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_committee" target=_blank>
face=Verdana> Eringer, Robert. Secret Agent Man. Rolling Stone,
1985
face=Verdana> Final Report. Book 1, Foreign and Military Intelligence. Senate Select
Committee to Study Government Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities,
94th Congress, 2nd Session, 26 April 1976, Special Report No. 94-755 (Better known
as the Church Committee Report). For instructions on how to order this document
from the National Archives, <A
face=Verdana>click here</A>. For an excellent
discussion of this topic on George Washington University's National Security Archive
website, see <A href="http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20000817"
target=_blank>. A part of Book 1 of the Church Committee Report is available at
the first link in the section title "A Critique." 
face=Verdana> For a 10-page summary of Ms. Rutz riveting story which includes
revealing testimony from other mind control victims, see <A
href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/nationbetrayed10pg"
face=Verdana>www.WantToKnow.info/nationbetrayed10pg</A>. She backs up her experience with declassified CIA documents
proving the existence of the programs she describes.
face=Verdana> Project Bluebird/Artichokes primary purpose was the study of
special interrogation techniquesprimarily hypnosis, truth serums and
brainwashing. See CIA-1978-S421-1 Project MKULTRA, The CIAs Program of
Research in Behavioral Modification, Appendix A, pg 66, Joint Hearing before the
Select Committee on Intelligence and the Subcommittee on Health and Scientific
Research of the Committee on Human Resources, United States Senate Ninety-Fifth
Congress, First Session, August 3, 1977. For instructions on how to order this
document from the National Archives, <A
face=Verdana>click here</A> CIA MORI ID 17395, p. 18. ESP Research, 1961 and 1962. This is a
declassified CIA document dealing with mind control. To verify the statement in the
text, use the FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) request as described on our ten-
page mind control summary at <A
number listed. For free access to these documents, see the Black Vault Government
Archive at <A href="http://www.theblackvault.com/modules.php?
face=Verdana>. To go directly to the above document, <A
face=Verdana> Condon, R. The Manchurian Candidate. New York: Jove Books,
1959/1988. To order book, <A
face=Verdana> CIA MORI ID 190527, pp. 1, 2. This is a declassified CIA document
summary at 
<A href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/mindcontrol10pg#ciadocs"
>. 
You should receive the government mind
control CDs within a month of your request. Once you receive them, look up the
MORI ID number listed.
For free, unlimited access to these
documents, go to the Black Vault Government Archive at <A
face=Verdana>. To go directly to the above document, for page 1, <A
face=Verdana> You can find a dozen examples of this in these footnotes. See
footnotes <A
target=_blank>39</A>, <A
target=_blank>40</A>,
<A href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/mindcontrol10pg#_edn41"
target=_blank>69</A> Mark, V.H., & Ervin, F.R. Violence and the Brain. New York:
Harper & Row, 1970. To order this book, <A
face=Verdana> Faden, R.R. Final Report. Advisory Committee on Human Radiation
Experiments. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1995. The full report
is available on the Department of Energy Website at:
<A
href="http://www.hss.energy.gov/healthsafety/ohre/roadmap/achre/index.html"
face=Verdana>http://www.hss.energy.gov/healthsafety/ohre/roadmap/achre/index.h
tml</A>. For the two pages detailing Dr. Sweet's
experiments: Chapter five <A
href="http://www.hss.energy.gov/healthsafety/ohre/roadmap/achre/chap5_4.html"
target=_blank>page 4</A>, and <A
href="http://www.hss.energy.gov/healthsafety/ohre/roadmap/achre/chap5_5.html"
target=_blank>page 5</A> Marks, J. The Search for the Manchurian Candidate. New York: W.W.
Norton, 1988. To order this book, <A
face=Verdana> Orne, M.T. The potential uses of hypnosis in interrogation. In A.D.
Biderman (Ed.), The Manipulation of Human Behavior (pp. 169-215). New York: John
Wiley & Sons, 1961. To order this book, <A
href="http://www.amazon.com/MANIPULATION-BEHAVIOR-Albert-Herbert-
Biderman/dp/B000OEUKE8/ref=sr_1_1?
face=Verdana> West, L.J. Dissociative reactions. In A.M. Freedman & H.I.
Kaplan (Eds.), Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry, pp. 885-889. Baltimore:
Williams and Wilkins, 1967.
face=Verdana> Janet, P. Psychological Healing; A Historical and Clinical Study,
London: George Allen and Unwin, 1925. To order this book, <A
prodId=B000BJNDWM" target=_blank>click
face=Verdana> Gillmor, D. I Swear By Apollo. Dr. Ewen Cameron and the CIA-
Brainwashing Experiments. Montreal: Eden press, 1987. To order this book,
<A href="http://www.campusi.com/bookFind/asp/bookFindPriceLst.asp?
face=Verdana> Scheflin, A.W., & Opton, E.M. The Mind manipulators. New York:
Paddington Press, 1978. To order this book, <A
face=Verdana> Thomas, G. Journey into Madness. The Secret Story of Secret CIA
Mind Control and Medical Abuse. New York: Bantam, 1989 (paperback 1990). To
order this book, <A
face=Verdana> Weinstein, H. Psychiatry and the CIA: Victims of Mind Control.
Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1990. To order this book, <A
face=Verdana> Collins, A. In the Sleep Room. The Story of CIA Brainwashing
Experiments in Canada. Toronto: Key Porter Books, 1988/1998. To order this book,
face=Verdana> CIA MORI ID 17468. This is a declassified CIA document dealing with
mind control. To verify the statement in the text, use the FOIA (Freedom of
Information Act) request as described on our ten-page mind control summary at
<A href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/mindcontrol10pg#ciadocs"
face=Verdana> Other Mental Health Project Grants awarded to Dr. Cameron by the
Department of National 
Health and Welfare were: Project
#604-5-11, The Effect of Senescence on Resistance to Stress, $195,388, 50-
57, Project #604-5-13, Research Studies on EEG and Electrophysiology,
$60,353, 50-57, Project #604-5-14, Support for a Behavioral Laboratory,
$17,875, 50-54, Project #604-5-76, Study of Effect of Nucleic Acid on Memory
Impairment in the Aged, $18,000, 59-63, Project #604-5-432, A Study of
Factors Which Promote or Retard Personality Change in Individuals Exposed to
Prolonged Repetition of Verbal Signals, $57,750, 61-64, see Collins, Anne. In the
Sleep room. The Story of CIA Brainwashing in Canada. Toronto: Key Porter Books,
1988/1998, p. 189. To order this book, <A
face=Verdana> Collins, Anne. In the Sleep room. The Story of CIA Brainwashing in
Canada. Toronto: Key Porter Books, 1988/1998, p. 258. To order this book,
face=Verdana> Cameron, D.E. Production of differential amnesia as a factor in the
treatment of schizophrenia. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 1, 26-34,
1960.
[<A title=""
target=_blank>40]</A> Cameron, D.E., Levy, L. Rubenstein, L., & Malmo, R.B.
Repetition of verbal signals: Behavioral and physiological changes. American Journal
of Psychiatry, 115, 985-991, 1959.
face=Verdana> Cameron, D.E., Lohrenz, J.G., & Handcock, K.A. The
depatterning treatment of schizophrenia. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 3, 65-76,
1962.
face=Verdana> Tyner, Arlene. Mind-Control Part 1: Canadian and US Survivors Seek
Justice, PROBE Magazine, March-April 2000. A copy of this article is available at
<A href="http://www.ctka.net/pr300-mkultra.html"
target=_blank>http://www.ctka.net/pr300-
mkultra.html</A>
face=Verdana> Fisher, S. An Investigation of Alleged Conditioning Phenomena
Under Hypnosis. Journal of Clinical Experimental Hypnosis, 3, 71-103,
1955.
face=Verdana> Rowland, L.W., Will Hypnotized Persons Try to Harm Themselves or
Others? Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 34, 114-117, 1939.
face=Verdana> Estabrooks, G.H. Spiritism. New York: E.M Dutton, 1947. To order
this book, <A href="http://www.amazon.com/Spiritism-George-Hoben-
Estabrooks/dp/B0007DNL5G/ref=sr_1_1/002-0128848-5614426?
face=Verdana> Harriman, P.L. The experimental induction of a multiple personality.
Psychiatry, 5, 179-186, 1942.
face=Verdana> Harriman, P.L. The experimental production of some phenomena
related to multiple personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 37, 244-
255, 1942.
face=Verdana> Estabrooks, G.H. Hypnotism. New York: E.M Dutton, 1943. To order
this book, <A
face=Verdana> Estabrooks, G.H. Hypnosis comes of age. Science Digest, 44-50,
April 1971. A copy of this article is available at <A
href="http://www.heart7.net/gh-estabrooks.html" target=_blank>http://www.heart7.net/gh-estabrooks.html</A> Okita, G.T., Plotz, E.J., & Davis, M.E. Placental Transfer of
Radioactive Digitoxin in Pregnant Women and its Fetal Distribution. Semiannual
Reports to the US Atomic Energy Commission, Vol. 1, Parts 1 6, 1954 to 1956. For
more on the Department of Energy website, scroll down slightly over 2/3 of the
webpage at 
<A
href="http://hss.energy.gov/HealthSafety/ohre/roadmap/roadmap/part3.html"
face=Verdana>http://hss.energy.gov/HealthSafety/ohre/roadmap/roadmap/part3.ht
ml</A> to the section titled: "UC-10. Carbon-14-
Labeled Digitoxin Administered to Pregnant Women to Determine Fetal
Distribution"
face=Verdana> New York Times, Feb. 10, 1995, Officials Cite More U.S. Tests With
Radiation, reports that about 9,000 Americans including children and newborns
were used in 154 human radiation tests sponsored by the Atomic Energy
Commission. Instructions to access this article in the New York Times archives and a
free copy of the article are <A
href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/childrenradiationtestsnytimes"
target=_blank>available here</A> Welsome, Eileen. The Plutonium Files, Americas Secret Medical
Experiments in the Cold War. New York: Dial Press, 220-221, 1999. To order this
book, <A
face=Verdana> Church Committee Report, book 1 p. 395, states that one of the
three principal functions of the Special Operations Division (SOD) of the US Army
Biological Center at Fort Detrick was to conduct biological research for the CIA. In
early 1952, SOD agreed to assist CIA in developing, testing, and maintaining
biological agents delivery systems. By this agreement, CIA acquired the knowledge,
skill, and facilities of the Army to develop biological weapons suited for the CIAs
use. Church Committee Report, Book 1, p. 389. Many of the early CIA LSD tests
were conducted at Fort Detrick. For instructions on how to order this document from
the National Archives, <A href="http://www.archives.gov/foia/index.html"
face=Verdana> USAINTC Letter to ACSI, DA. Subject: Staff Study: Material Testing
Program EA1279, dated 15 October 1959. (Includes a reference to ACSI-SC letter, 27
July 1959, requesting study).
face=Verdana> Dowling, Kevin. The Olsen File: A Secret that Could Destroy the CIA.
Mail On Sunday. 23 August 1998. See this article at <A
href="http://www.frankolsonproject.org/Articles/LondonMail.html"
face=Verdana>http://www.frankolsonproject.org/Articles/LondonMail.html
</A>. The entire Frank Olson website at <A
href="http://www.frankolsonproject.org/" target=_blank>http://www.frankolsonproject.org</A> is filled with excellent information on CIA mind control
programs.
face=Verdana> New York Times, May 17, 1965, front page, Matador With a Radio
Stops Wired Bull; Modified Behavior in Animals Subject of Brain Study. Instructions
to access this article in the Times archives and a free copy of the article are
available at <A href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/650517nytimes"
face=Verdana>http://www.WantToKnow.info/650517nytimes</A> Delgado, J.M.R. Evaluation of permanent implantation of electrodes
within the brain. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 7, 637-644,
1955.
face=Verdana> Delgado, J.M.R. Prolonged stimulation of brain in awake monkeys.
Journal of Neurophysiology, 22, 458-475, 1959.
face=Verdana> Delgado, J.M.R. Emotional behavior in animals and humans.
Psychiatric Research Reports, 12, 259-266, 1960.
face=Verdana> Delgado, J.M.R. Social rank and radio-stimulated aggressiveness in
monkeys. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 144, 383-390,
1967.
face=Verdana> Delgado, J.M.R. Physical Control of the Mind. New York: Harper
& Row, 1971 (paperback 1977). To order this book, <A
face=Verdana> Rosvold, H.E., & Delgado, J.M.R. The effect of delayed-
alternation test performance of stimulating or destroying electrical structures within
the frontal lobes of the monkeys brain. Journal of Comparative and Physiological
Psychology, 49, 365-372, 1956.
face=Verdana> Kreech, David. Controlling the Mind Controllers. THINK 32,
July/August 1966.
face=Verdana> Delgado, J.M., Mark, V., Sweet, W., Ervin, F., Weiss, G., Bach-Y-Rita,
G., & Hagiwara, R. Intracerebral radio stimulation and recording in completely
free patients. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 147, 329-340,
1968.
face=Verdana> Mark, V.H., Ervin, F.R. Violence and the Brain. New York: Harper
& Row, 1970. To order this book, <A
face=Verdana> Heath, R.G. Electrical self-stimulation of the brain in man. American
Journal of Psychiatry, 120, 571-577, 1963.
face=Verdana> Heath, R.G. Pleasure and brain activity in man. Deep and surface
electroencephalograms during orgasm. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 151,
3-18, 1972.
face=Verdana> Heath, R.G., John, S.B. & Fontana, C.J. Stereotaxic implantation
of electrodes in the human brain: A method for long-term study and treatment. IEEE
Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 23, 296-304, 1976.
face=Verdana> Moan, C.E., & Heath, R.G. Septal stimulation for the initiation
of heterosexual activity in a homosexual male. Journal of Behavior Therapy and
Experimental Psychiatry, 3, 23-30, 1972.
face=Verdana> Lilly, John. The Scientist, A Metaphysical Autobiography. Berkeley:
Ronin Publishing, Revised 1988/1996. To order this book, <A
here</A>. Dr. Lilly was not the only one
experimenting with this technique. In 1955, he and Dr. J. Roe, B. Mountcastle, and L.
Kurger, Johns Hopkins Medical School; Drs. C. Woolsey and J. Hind, University of
Wisconsin; Dr. Karl Pribram, Institute of Living, Hartford Conn.; Dr. Leonard Malis, Mt.
Sinai Hospital, New York City experimented on dolphins at
Marineland.
face=Verdana> The USGSC (US Global Strategy Council) has issued a wide variety
of papers on the nonlethal weapons concept. For example: In Search of Nonlethal
Strategy, Janet Morris; Nonlethality: A Global Strategy White paper;
Nonlethality Briefing Supplement No. 1; and Nonlethality in Operational
Continuum. For more on this from a US army website: <A
href="http://www.tradoc.army.mil/tpubs/pams/p525-73.doc"
face=Verdana>http://www.tradoc.army.mil/tpubs/pams/p525-
73.doc</A>.
face=Verdana> Wall Street Journal, Jan. 4, 1993.
face=Verdana> Morris, Janet. In Search of a Non-lethal Strategy. USGSC (US Global
Strategy Council), p. 14.
face=Verdana> Baldwin, M., Bach, S.A., & Lewis, S.Z. Effects of radio-
frequency energy on primate cerebral activity. Neurology, 10, 178-187, 1960. This
publication was a result of MKULTRA Subproject 62.
face=Verdana> An Infrasonic System, US Army Mobility Equipment Research and
Development Center, Fort Bellever, VA, 1969. See section on Effects-Human. In a
his book, <A
prodId=0312267398" target=_blank>The Future
War</A>, John Alexander, one of the supporters,
forerunners and founding fathers of the non-lethal weapons concept, tries to
legitimize the acquisition and deployment of these destructive
weapons.
face=Verdana> Electronics Today, Dec. 1985.
face=Verdana> Method and System for Altering Consciousness, Patent 5,123,899,
US Patent Office, June 23 1992. To view this patent on the website of the US Patent
and Trademark Office, <A href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?
Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/search-
bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=5
,123,899.PN.&OS=PN/5,123,899&RS=PN/5,123,899"
face=Verdana> Letter from Edward Tilton of Silent Sounds, Inc. to author Dr. Armen
Victorian, Dec. 13, 1996. For more on this, <A
href="http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/mindcontrol.html"
face=Verdana> and <A href="http://books.google.com/books?
id=2htuO07UAUoC&pg=PA180&lpg=PA180&dq=
%22silent+sounds+inc
%22&source=web&ots=EC0a3L5U8B&sig=bP9yaPR9b3HL9n0j5UKa
aHc4E60#PPA180,M1" target=_blank>here</A>. 
face=Verdana> Microwave US-USSR, Vol VI, July-Dec. 1976 p. 4, Office of Security,
US Dept. of State.
face=Verdana> Mind Reading Computer. Time, July 1, 1974, p. 67. You can read the
entire article in the archives of Time at <A
href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,942916,00.html"
face=Verdana>http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,942916,00.html
</A>. See also Rorvik, David M. As Man Becomes
Machine. London: Sphere Books, 1979. To order this book, <A
prodId=0349130353" target=_blank>click
face=Verdana> Ordering instructions for the declassified mind control documents
are at the end of the summary, or simply <A
face=Verdana>. We received the CDs less than three weeks after we ordered
them.
Updated June 10, 2007 Mind Control
Cover-up
Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J.
Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed, and
publicly discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations
of misconduct and fraud within International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster,
Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud
in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation and the truth without
the aid of law enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute and
expose public corruption. We utilize our communications to thwart further libelous
and malicious attacks on our person, our property, and our business. We
continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and some communications are a
means of protecting our rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced
Media Group is also a member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed from
our Contact List. Number 7.


From:
righton01@bellsouth.net Subject: This subject, for some reason, is not
presently being addressed by ANY of our political leaders; why do you think?
 Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 17:14:11 -0400 To:
amgroup01@msn.com
Mind Control Cover-up
The Secrets of Mind Control
This concise mind control summary is
based on astonishing excerpts from three landmark books: Bluebird by Colin A.
Ross, MD; Mind Controllers by Dr. Armen Victorian; and A Nation Betrayed by Carol
Rutz. All three authors provide hundreds of footnotes to support their
groundbreaking research. Much of this information is based on 18,000 pages of
declassified CIA mind control documents. To order these revealing documents in CD
format directly from the U.S. government, click here. Join in powerfully building a
better world for all by spreading the word.
The Secret Agenda of Mind
Control
Please note: the letters and numbers after
each paragraph denote the book and page number from which the information was
taken. BBBluebird MCMind Controllers NBA Nation
Betrayed..
The CIA Mind Control
Projects
A CIA document dated 10 Feb 1954 [4]
describes an experiment on the creation of unsuspecting assassins: Miss [whited
out] was instructed (having expressed a fear of firearms) that she would use every
method at her disposal to awaken Miss [whited out] (now in a deep hypnotic sleep).
Failing this, she would pick up a pistol and fire it at Miss [whited out]. She was
instructed that she would not hesitate to kill [whited out]. Miss [whited out]
carried out these suggestions including firing the (unloaded) gun at [whited out] and
then proceeded to fall into a deep sleep. After proper suggestions were made, both
were awakened. Miss [whited out] expressed absolute denial that the foregoing
sequence had happened. BB 36, 37
MKULTRA grew into a mammoth
undertaking. The nature of the research included these specific problems:
[5]
 * Can we create by
post-H (hypnotic) control an action contrary to an individuals basic moral
principles?
 * Can we alter a persons
personality? Can we guarantee total amnesia under any and all conditions?

 * Could we seize a subject
and in the space of an hour by post-H control have him crash an airplane, etc?

 * Can we devise a system
for making unwilling subjects into willing agents and then transfer that control to
untrained agency agents in the field by use of codes or identifying signs? NB 13, 14,
28
In a 1971 Science Digest article [6], Dr.
G.H. Estabrooks states, By the 1920s clinical hypnotists learned to split certain
individuals into multiple personalities like Jeckyl-Hydes. During WWII, I worked this
technique with a Marine lieutenant Ill call Jones. I split his personality into Jones A
and Jones B. Jones A, once a normal Marine, became entirely different. He talked
communist doctrine and meant it. He was welcomed enthusiastically by communist
cells, and was deliberately given a dishonorable discharge. Jones B was the deeper
personality, knew all the thoughts of Jones A, and was imprinted to say nothing
during conscious phases. All I had to do was hypnotize him, get in touch with Jones
B, and I had a pipeline straight into the Communist camp. BB 167-169 For
more on CIA mind control projects, click here.
Dr. Jose Delgado, a neurosurgeon and Yale
professor, [7][8][9] received funding for brain electrode research on children and
adults. In the 1950s, he developed the Stimoceiver; a miniature electrode placed
within an individuals cranium capable of receiving and transmitting electronic
signals. Delgado was able to control the movements of his subjects by pushing
buttons on a remote transmitter. He demonstrated his Stimoceivers by wiring a
fully-grown bull. With the device in place, Delgado stepped into the ring with the
bull. The animal charged towards the experimenter and then suddenly stopped,
just before it reached him. The powerful beast had been stopped with the simple
action of pushing a button on a small box held in Delgados hand. [10] MC 147, BB
88 For more on electronic implants, click here.
The Mind Control
Doctors
In the second half of the 20th century,
mind control projects resulted in extensive political abuse of psychiatry. Many
thousands were subjected to unethical mind control experiments by leading
psychiatrists and medical schools. Mind control experimentation was not only
tolerated by medical professionals, but published in psychiatric and medical
journals. Dr. William Sweet participated in both brain electrode implant experiments
and the injection of uranium into medical patients at Harvard University. [11][12]
Army doctors were actively involved in LSD testing at least until the late 1970s.
Subjects of LSD experiments included children as young as five years old, and brain
electrodes were implanted in children as young as 11 years of age. BB, pg. K, 1,
21
Linda MacDonald was a victim of Dr. Ewen
Camerons [13][14][15][16] destructive mind control experiments in 1963. Dr.
Cameron was at various times president of the American and World Psychiatric
Associations. He used a treatment which involved intensive application of these
brainwashing techniques; drug disinhibition, prolonged isolation, and ECT [Electro
Convulsive Therapy] treatments. [17][18][19] The amount of electricity introduced
into Lindas brain exceeded by 76.5 times the maximum amount recommended. Dr.
Camerons technique resulted in permanent and complete amnesia. A class action
suit against the CIA for Dr. Camerons MKULTRA experiments was settled out of
court for $750,000, divided among eight plaintiffs in 1988. BB 126, 181-187
For more on the mind control doctors, click here.
26 July 1963, MEMORANDUM FOR:
Director of Central Intelligence [20] FROM: CIA Inspector
General
The concepts involved in manipulating
behavior are found by many people both within and outside the Agency [CIA] to be
distasteful and unethical. Nevertheless, there have been major accomplishments
both in research and operational employment. Over the ten-year life of the program
many additional avenues to the control of human behavior have been designated
under the MKULTRA charter, including radiation, electro-shock, and harassment
substances. Some activities raise questions of legality implicit in the original charter.
A final phase of the testing places the rights and interests of US citizens in
jeopardy.
Technical Services Division initiated a
program for covert testing of materials on unwitting US citizens in 1955. TSD has
pursued a philosophy of minimum documentation in keeping with the high
sensitivity of the projects. Some files contained little or no data at all. There are just
two individuals in TSD who have full knowledge of the MKULTRA program, and most
of that knowledge is unrecorded. NB 108-113
For 10 riveting pages of reliable, verifiable
mind control information, click here
For other reliable resources on mind
control, visit our Mind Control Information Center
[1] CIA MORI ID 190684, pp. 1, 4. This is a
within a month of your request. For free, unlimited access to these documents, go to
the Black Vault Government Archive at <A
face=Verdana>. To go directly to the CIA document quoted, for page 1, click here.
For page 4, click here.
[2] New York Times, Aug. 2, 1977, Mind-
Control Studies Had Origins in Trial of Mindszenty. This engaging article includes a
concise history of mind control projects. To view the entire article, click here. The
U.S. Department of Energy Website also provides a highly revealing, detailed report
of these mind control projects and the destruction of their records at <A
face=Verdana>http://hss.energy.gov/healthsafety/ohre/roadmap/achre/chap3_4.htm
l</A>. See also a CIA document available
here.
[3] Final Report. Book 1, Foreign and
Military Intelligence. Senate Select Committee to Study Government Operations
with Respect to Intelligence Activities, 94th Congress, 2nd Session, 26 April 1976,
Special Report No. 94-755 (Better known as the Church Committee Report). See
Book 1, p. 406. For instructions on how to order this document from the National
Archives, click here. For a related article on George Washington University's National
Security Archive website, see <A
href="http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20000817"
T face=Verdana>. For an excellent Wikipedia article, click
[4] CIA MORI ID 190691, p. 1. This is a
face=Verdana>. To go directly to the page with the CIA document quoted, click
[5] CIA MORI ID 140401, pp. 6, 7. This is

actually a declassified CIA document dealing with mind control from Project
BLUEBIRD, the immediate precursor to MKULTRA. Its official estimated publication
date is 1/1/52. The nature of the BLUEBIRD research was very similar that of the
MKULTRA project. To order this highly revealing document go to <A
href="http://www.foia.cia.gov/sample_request_letter.asp"
NT face=Verdana>, and follow the instructions. For reasons unknown, this
document is not included in the mind control CDs.
[6] Estabrooks, G.H. Hypnosis comes of
age. Science Digest, 44-50, April 1971.
[7] Delgado, J.M.R. Evaluation of
permanent implantation of electrodes within the brain. Electroencephalography and
Clinical Neurophysiology, 7, 637-644, 1955.
[8] Delgado, J.M.R. Social rank and radio-
stimulated aggressiveness in monkeys. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 144,
383-390, 1967.
[9] Delgado, J.M.R. Physical Control of the
Mind. New York: Harper & Row, 1971 (paperback 1977). To order, click
here.
[10] New York Times, May 17, 1965, front
page, Matador With a Radio Stops Wired Bull; Modified Behavior in Animals Subject
of Brain Study. Instructions to purchase this article from the New York Times
archives and our free copy of the article are available at <A
href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/650517nytimes" target=_blank>http://www.WantToKnow.info/650517nytimes</A>[11] Faden, R.R. Final Report. Advisory
Committee on Human Radiation Experiments. Washington, DC: US Government
Printing Office, 1995. The full, highly revealing report is available on the U.S.
Department of Energy Website at: <A
href="http://www.hss.energy.gov/healthsafety/ohre/roadmap/achre/index.html"
face=Verdana>http://www.hss.energy.gov/healthsafety/ohre/roadmap/achre/index.h
tml</A>. For the two pages detailing Dr. Sweet's
experiments: Chapter five page 4, and page 5.
[12] Mark, V.H., & Ervin, F.R. Violence
and the Brain. New York: Harper & Row, 1970. To order this book, click
here.
[13] Gillmor, D. I Swear By Apollo. Dr. Ewen
Cameron and the CIA-Brainwashing Experiments. Montreal: Eden press, 1987. To
order this book, click here.
[14] Scheflin, A.W., & Opton, E.M. The
Mind manipulators. New York: Paddington Press, 1978. To order book, click
here.
[15] Thomas, G. Journey into Madness. The
Secret Story of Secret CIA Mind Control and Medical Abuse. New York: Bantam, 1989
(paperback 1990). To order this book, click here.
[16] Weinstein, H. Psychiatry and the CIA:
Victims of Mind Control. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1990. To order
this book, click here.
[17] Collins, A. In the Sleep Room. The
Story of CIA Brainwashing Experiments in Canada. Toronto: Key Porter Books,
1988/1998. To order this book, click here.
[18] Cameron, D.E. Production of
differential amnesia as a factor in the treatment of schizophrenia. Comprehensive
Psychiatry, 1, 26-34, 1960.
[19] Cameron, D.E., Levy, L. Rubenstein, L.,
& Malmo, R.B. Repetition of verbal signals: Behavioral and physiological
changes. American Journal of Psychiatry, 115, 985-991, 1959.
[20] CIA MORI ID 17748, pp. 2, 4, 6-9. This
is a declassified CIA document dealing with mind control. To verify the statement in
the text, use the FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) request as described on our ten-
>. You should receive the mind control CDs within a month
of your request. For free, unlimited access to these documents, go to the Black Vault
face=Verdana>. To go directly to the CIA documents quoted:
For page 2, click here.
In addition the above CIA document, to
verify this quote and other key mind control information in a highly revealing July
21, 1977 New York Times article available in their archives, click here.
Mind Control
On May 16, 2008, at 1:59 PM, Stan
Caterbone wrote:
 May 16, 2008
 Tome, I
know that I am the victim of this technology that both Neurobotics claims and
that Carole Smith has researched regarding invasive mind control. I have
some of my research posted on my research blog
 <A
href="http://www.advancedmediagroupresearch.wordpress.com/"
face=Verdana>www.advancedmediagroupresearch.wordpress.com</A> . The peering into one's thoughts and ideas
I can live with, however the pain and torture of some of this technology is very
hurtful and painful. I am trying desperately to find the source and the means
of how they deploy this on me. I try to change my location when they use it,
but that does not stop it. I was told that the perps can isolate a person with
radar and satellite, so it is hard or impossible for me to avoid. I know
sometime tonight or tomorrow they will hit me again. They usually need to
alternate the pain and pleasure so that it reaches its full impact. You know,
kind of like making sure there is always a spectrum of highs and lows. I
believe they use a technique of using the telepathy to engage me in hostile and
harassing conversation along with some sort or electromagnetic energy isolated on
me. Any help would be greatly appreciated. This is one of the
main problems I have with writing briefs and filing court documents. They
will use this to interfere with my focus and to confuse me while the hackers change
my documents and briefs. It is very challenging, but at least I am litigating,
which is the important thing.
 Thanks. Stan J.
Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
 
Notice and
Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have
been slandered, defamed, and publicly discredited since 1987 due to going public
(Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct and fraud within International Signal
& Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via
South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to
defend our reputation and the truth without the aid of law enforcement and the
media, which would normally prosecute and expose public corruption. We
utilize our communications to thwart further libelous and malicious attacks on our
person, our property, and our business. We continue our fight for
justice through the Courts, and some communications are a means of protecting our
rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced Media Group is also
a member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed from our Contact List.
Number 7.


From: <A
href="mailto:righton01@bellsouth.net">righton01@bellsouth.net</A>
 Subject: A few things that have been
occupying me. Have you heard of Delgado- the Nazi scientist that is now at Yale (I
believe) working on mind control?
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 11:12:46
-0400
To: <A
href="mailto:amgroup01@msn.com">amgroup01@msn.com</A>
I hope I am wrong, Stan, but I have had the
feeling for a long time that we will not have the election, that Bush will pull another
"terrorist attack" on an American city, an attack that he will use to declare
martial law, etc. and "delay" elections. Anyway, there is not a lot we
can do if this is in the cards. However, I try to contribute to the positive
energy rather than to the negative energy so I do not let fear get the upper hand.
I think they win when we become afraid and depressed. It is hard, at
times, not to let it all get to you, but I try and mostly, at last, am
succeeding.
Along with you, Stan, Professor Boyle is a
hero. You both boldly speak out against "wrong" and "evil." Boyle
wrote an aritlce and I edited it (below) and posted on my blog.
THE ROLE OF CIVIL RESISTERS
IN AMERICA
In his demanding role as an
educator, attorney, consultant, and respected expert witness on International Law,
Professor Francis A. Boyle, Professor of Law at Northwestern University Law
School, has been in the trenches TAKING ON THE STATE
CRIMES OF VARIOUS U.S. ADMINISTRATIONS FOR CLOSE TO THIRTY
YEARS. 
CIVIL RESISTANCE has been
the primary tool utilized by the activists in their legal-based, court
room battles. As a result, THE CIVIL RESISTERS, he insists, HAVE
BECOME THE SHERIFFS and THE U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
COMMITTING THE CRIMES, HAVE BECOME THE
OUTLAWS.
Professor BOYLE UNDERSCORES HOW
SUCCESSIVE U.S. ADMINISTRATIONS HAVE MANIPULATED THE PUBLIC IN ORDER TO
JUSTIFY THEIR LAWLESS WAYS. 
The Bush-Cheney Gang is one of his prime
examples. He said that it is hell bent on stealing the hydrocarbon empire
from the Muslim states and people living in Central Asia and the Persian
Gulf. 
Essentially, the government sells its
foreign policy wrongdoings, like the war in Iraq, by posing a Hobessian
choice to the people: It suggests that there are only two
alternatives: 
face=Verdana>1. either THREATEN OR USE U.S. MILITARY
FORCE in a particular situation; or, 
2. ALLOW THE ENEMIES TO
PREVAIL. 
Professor Boyle insisted that THEY
IGNORE A THIRD WAY:
3. DIPLOMACY, PEACEFUL
RESOLUTIONS OF DISPUTES, THE APPLICATION OF THE RULES OF LAW AND THE
TRADITIONS OF FAIR PLAY. 
Professor Boyle labeled the CONFLICT IN
IRAQ as CRIMINAL, and the FOREIGN POLICY OF THE BUSH-CHENEY GANG, which
was FUELED, IN PART, BY THE RABID NEOCON IDEOLOGUES, as out of
control.
How does civil resistance
work within the framework of the American judicial system?

Well, Professor Boyle cited
the People v. Jarka case, among other LANDMARK LITIGATION,
to illustrate some of his key points. In 1984, activists protested in front
of the Great Lakes Naval Station base, which is located in Illinois, on Lake
Michigan. 
The focus of the demonstration
centered on the issues of:
1. U.S.s violence-producing intervention
in Central America; and,
2. our countrys buildup of offensive
nuclear weapons. 
Ronald Reagan president at the time. The
defendants were arrested, when they sat in front of the naval base, locked
arms, and refused to be moved. 
They were CHARGED by
authorities WITH TWO CRIMES:
1. mob action; and,
2. resisting
arrest.
The defendants, in Jarka, elected a trial
by jury. The trial judge, the Hon.
Alphonse F. Witt, permitted testimony on their behalf from eight expert
witnesses on INTERNATIONAL LAW. 
The expert witnesses testified to the fact
that:
The actions of the Reagan
administration, in Central America, were in violation of well settled legal principles
established by:
1. the UN Charter; 
2, the Geneva
Convention; 
3. the Hague Convention; and, other
precedents.
THEY TESTIFIED TO THE FACT
THAT A NUCLEAR WEAPON would:
1. kill potentially hundreds of
thousands of people; and,
2. cause horrific harm to combatants and
noncombatants alike; and,
3. violate the principles of
NECESSITY AND PROPORTIONALITY under International Law. 
In Illinois, a defendant has a right,
under certain circumstances, to raise the Common Law
defense of NECESSITY. In other words,
the defendants were permitted to argue to the jury that their supposed
criminal conduct, [the blocking the road into the base], was justified in
order to:
avoid a public or private injury greater
than the injury that might reasonably result from his or her own conduct.

Judge ALPHONSE
WITT actually INSTRUCTED THE JURY THAT THE THREAT OR USE OF
NUCLEAR WEAPONS VIOLATED INTERNATIONAL LAW. Needless to
say, all the DEFENDANTS WERE ACQUITTED.
The Jarka case
also SPOTLIGHTS ONE OF THE HALLMARKS OF A CIVIL RESISTANCE
ACTION:
The DEFENDANTS IN IT SINCERELY
BELIEVED that they HADNT VIOLATED ANY CRIMINAL LAWS. 
Professor Boyle put it this
way: 
From their perspective, [its the] U.S.
government officials [who are] on trial...Civil resisters disobeyed nothing--to the
contrary:
THEY OBEYED INTERNATIONAL LAW AND
THE U.S. CONSTITUTION.
In Jarka, Professor Boyle served as
counsel to the LAWYERS HANDLING THE PRECEDENT-SETTING CASE, and also
in a companion matter of Chicago v. Streeter. 
He praised the work of all of the trial
lawyers involved in the two cases, and also the VIGOROUS EFFORTS OF THE
LAWYERS COMMITTEE ON NUCLEAR POLICY (LCNP).
Professor Boyle also discussed cases
involving the crime of Trespass. Its A SPECIFIC INTENT OFFENSE and is one
of the charges usually leveled at someone for participating in a civil resistance
action. IN ORDER TO CONVICT, however, the government must prove that the
defendant acted with an unlawful purpose. 
Often, in order to make their point
about government evildoing, a resister will go ON THE PROPERTY OF
A FEDERAL FACILITY, LIKE THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY OR THE PENTAGON,
WITHOUT PERMISSION. 
The defendant did not do so for an
unlawful purpose, but -was instead
acting for the express purpose of upholding the requirements of international
law...
-in order to prevent the
commission of international crimes by U.S. officials there and
elsewhere.
Professor Boyle highlighted some of
the antiwar groups in the country who have utilized Civil
Resistance over the years:
**The legendary 
**Gulf War Resisters
**Anti-Apartheid Movement
**Greenpeace 
**Sacred Earth
**Sanctuary
Movement 
**Pledge of Resistance, among
others. 
PROFESSOR BOYLE SAYS
that:
BY THE YEAR 2004, NUCLEAR RESISTER had estimated
that THERE WERE MORE THAN, 9,400
ANTIWAR-RELATED ARRESTS IN THE U.S. ALONE. 
All of this caused Former Attorney General
Ramsey to remark:
Our jails are filling up with
saints.
*****
Since 9/11, and seemingly without the
notice of most Americans, the federal government has assumed the authority to
institute martial law, arrest a wide swath of dissidents (citizen and noncitizen alike),
and detain people without legal or constitutional recourse in the event of "an
emergency influx of immigrants in the U.S., or to support the rapid development of
new programs."
Beginning in 1999, the government has
entered into a series of single-bid contracts with Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg,
Brown and Root (KBR) to build detention camps at undisclosed locations within the
United States. The government has also contracted with several companies to build
thousands of railcars, some reportedly equipped with shackles, ostensibly to
transport detainees.
According to diplomat and author Peter
Dale Scott, the KBR contract is part of a Homeland Security plan titled ENDGAME,
which sets as its goal the removal of "all removable aliens" and "potential
terrorists."
Fraud-busters such as Rep. Henry Waxman,

D-Los Angeles, have complained about these contracts, saying that more taxpayer
dollars should not go to taxpayer-gouging Halliburton. But the real question is: What
kind of "new programs" require the construction and refurbishment of detention
facilities in nearly every state of the union with the capacity to house perhaps
millions of people?
Sect. 1042 of the 2007 National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA), "Use of the Armed Forces in Major Public Emergencies,"
gives the executive the power to invoke martial law. For the first time in more than a
century, the president is now authorized to use the military in response to "a natural
disaster, a disease outbreak, a terrorist attack or any other condition in which the
President determines that domestic violence has occurred to the extent that state
officials cannot maintain public order."
The Military Commissions Act of 2006,
rammed through Congress just before the 2006 midterm elections, allows for the
indefinite imprisonment of anyone who donates money to a charity that turns up on
a list of "terrorist" organizations, or who speaks out against the government's
policies. The law calls for secret trials for citizens and noncitizens
alike.
Also in 2007, the White House quietly
issued National Security Presidential Directive 51 (NSPD-51), to ensure "continuity
of government" in the event of what the document vaguely calls a "catastrophic
emergency." Should the president determine that such an emergency has occurred,
he and he alone is empowered to do whatever he deems necessary to ensure
"continuity of government." This could include everything from canceling elections
to suspending the Constitution to launching a nuclear attack. Congress has yet to
hold a single hearing on NSPD-51.
U.S. Rep. Jane Harman, D-Venice (Los
Angeles County) has come up with a new way to expand the domestic "war on
terror." Her Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007
(HR1955), which passed the House by the lopsided vote of 404-6, would set up a
commission to "examine and report upon the facts and causes" of so-called violent
radicalism and extremist ideology, then make legislative recommendations on
combatting it.
According to commentary in the Baltimore
Sun, Rep. Harman and her colleagues from both sides of the aisle believe the
country faces a native brand of terrorism, and needs a commission with sweeping
investigative power to combat it.
A clue as to where Harman's commission
might be aiming is the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act, a law that labels those who
"engage in sit-ins, civil disobedience, trespass, or any other crime in the name of
animal rights" as terrorists. Other groups in the crosshairs could be anti-abortion
protesters, anti-tax agitators, immigration activists, environmentalists, peace
demonstrators, Second Amendment rights supporters ... the list goes on and on.
According to author Naomi Wolf, the National Counterterrorism Center holds the
names of roughly 775,000 "terror suspects" with the number increasing by 20,000
per month.
The Guardian newspaper, that defender of
truth in the United Kingdom, published an article by the Science Correspondent, Ian
Sample, on 9 February 2007 entitled:
The Brain Scan that can read peoples
intentions, with the sub-heading: Call for ethical debate over possible use of new
technology in interrogation". (Does this mean we can give up waterboarding
dissidents?)
"Using the scanner, we could look around
the brain for this information and read out something that from the outside there's
no way you could possibly tell is in there. It's like shining a torch around, looking for
writing on a wall", the scientists were reported as saying.
At the same time, Londons Science
Museum was holding an exhibition entitled Neurobotics: The Future of Thinking.
This venue had been chosen for the launch in October 2006 of the news that human
thoughts could be read using a scanner. Dr Geraint Rees smiling face could be seen
in a photograph at the Neurobotics website, under the heading "The Mind
Reader". 
Dr Rees is one of the scientists who have
apparently cracked the problem which has preoccupied philosophers and scientists
since before Plato: they had made entry into the conscious mind. Such a reversal of
human historical evolution, announced in such a pedestrian fashion, makes one
wonder what factors have been in play, and what omissions made, in getting
together this show, at once banal and extraordinary. 
The announcement arrives as if out of a
vacuum. The neuroscientist - modern-style hunter-gatherer of information and
darling of the "Need to Know" policies of modern government - does little to explain
how he achieved this goal of entering the conscious mind, nor does he put his work
into any historical context. Instead, we are asked in the Science Museums
programme notes: 
How would you feel if someone could read
your innermost thoughts? Geraint Rees of UCL says he can. By using brain-imaging
technology he's beginning to decode thought and explore the difference between
the conscious and unconscious mind. But how far will it go? And shouldnt your
thoughts remain your personal business?
If Dr. Rees has decoded the mind
sufficiently for such an announcement to be made in an exhibition devoted to it,
presumably somewhere is the mind which has been, and is continuing to be,
decoded. He is not merely continuing his experiments using functional magnetic
resolution scanning (fMRI) in the way neuroscientists have been observing their
subjects under scanning devices for years, asking them to explain what they feel or
think while the scientists watch to see which area lights up, and what the cerebral
flow in the brain indicates for various brain areas. 
Dr Rees is decoding the mind in terms of
conscious and unconscious processes. For that, one must have accessed
consciousness itself. Whose consciousness? Where is the owner of that
consciousness and unconsciousness? How did he/she feel? Why not ask them to
tell us how it feels, instead of asking us.
The Neurobotics Exhibition was clearly set
up to make these exciting new discoveries an occasion for family fun, and there
were lots of games for visitors to play. One gets the distinct impression that we are
being softened up for the introduction of radical new technology which will, perhaps,
make the mind a communal pool rather than an individual
possession. 
Information technology seeks to connect
us all to each other in as many ways as possible, but also, presumably, to those
vast data banks which allow government control not only to access all information
about our lives, but now also to our thoughts, even to our unconscious processing.
Does anyone care?
One of the most popular exhibits was the
Mindball game, which required two players to go literally head-to-head in a battle
for brainpower, and used brainpower alone. Strapped up with headbands which
pick up brain waves, the game uses neurofeedback, but the person who is calm and
relaxed wins the game. One received the impression that this calmness was the
spirit that the organisers wished to reinforce, to deflect any undue public panic that
might arise from the news that private thoughts could now be read with a scanner.
The ingress into the mind as a private place was primarily an event to be enjoyed
with the family on an afternoon out:
Imagine being able to control a computer
with only the power of your mind. Or read peoples thoughts and know if theyre
lying. And what if a magnetic shock to the brain could make you more creativebut
should we be able to engineer our minds?
Think your thoughts are private? Ever told
a lie and been caught red-handed? Using brain-scanning technology, scientists are
beginning to probe our minds and tell if were lying. Other scientists are decoding
our desires and exploring the difference between our conscious and unconscious
mind. But can you really trust the technology?
Other searching questions are raised in the
program notes, and more games:
Find out if youve got what it takes to be a
modern-day spy in this new interactive family exhibition. After being recruited as a
trainee spy, explore the skills and abilities required by real agents and use some of
the latest technologies that help spies gather and analyse information. Later go on
and discover what its like to be spied upon. Uncover a secret store of prototype
gadgets that give you a glimpse into the future of spy technologies and finally use
everything youve learnt to escape before qualifying as a fully-fledged agent!

There were also demonstrations of grateful
paraplegics and quadriplegics showing how the gods of science have so unselfishly
liberated them from their prisons: this was the serious Nobel Prize side of the show.
But there was no-one representing Her Majestys government to demonstrate how
these very same devices can be used quite freely, and with relative ease, in our
wireless age, to conduct experiments on free-ranging civilians tracked anywhere in
the world, and using an infinitely extendable form of electrode which doesnt require
visible contact with the scalp at all. Electrodes, like electricity, can also take an
invisible form an electrode is a terminal of an electric source through which
electrical energy or current may flow in or out. The brain itself is an electrical circuit.
Every brain has its own unique resonating frequency. The brain is an infinitely more
sensitive receiver and transmitter than the computer, and even in the wireless age,
the comprehension of how wireless networks operate appears not to extend to the
workings of the brain. The monotonous demonstration of scalps with electrodes
attached to them, in order to demonstrate the contained conduction of electrical
charges, is a scientific fatuity, in so far as it is intended to demonstrate
comprehensively the capability of conveying charges to the brain, or for that
matter, to any nerve in the body, as a form of invisible torture.
As Neurobotics claims: Your brain is
amazing, but the power and control over brains and nervous systems achieved by
targeting brain frequencies with radiowaves must have been secretly amazing
government scientists for many years. The problem that now arises, at the point of
readiness when so much has been achieved, is how to put the technology into
action in such a way, as it will be acceptable in the public domain. This requires
getting it through wider government and legal bodies, and for that, it must be seen
to spring from the unbiased scientific investigations into the workings of the brain,
in the best tradition of the leading universities. It is given over to Dr Rees and his
colleague, Professor Haynes, endowed with the disclosure for weightier Guardian
readers, to carry the torch for the government. Those involved may also have noted
the need to show the neuroscientist in a more responsible light, following US
neuroengineer for government sponsored Lockheed Martin, John Norseens,
ingenuous comment, in 2000, about his belief about the consequences of his work
in fMRI:
If this research pans out, said Norseen,
you can begin to manipulate what someone is thinking even before they know it.
And added: "The ethics dont concern me, but they should concern someone
else."
While the neuroscientists report their
discovery (without even so much as the specific frequency of the light employed by
this scanner/torch), issuing ethical warnings while incongruously continuing with
their mind-blowing work, the government which sponsors them, remains absolutely
mute. The present probing of peoples intentions, minds, background thoughts,
hopes and emotions is being expanded into the more complex and subtle aspects of
thinking and feeling. We have, however, next to no technical information about their
methods. The description of shining a torch around the brain is as absurd a report
as one could read of a scientific endeavour, especially one that carries such
enormous implications for the future of mankind. What is this announcement, with
its technical obfuscation, preparing us for? 
Writing in Wired contributing editor Steve
Silberman points out that the lie-detection capability of fMRI is poised to transform
the security system, the judicial system, and our fundamental notions of privacy.
He quotes Cephos founder, Steven Laken, whose company plans to market the new
technology for lie detection. Laken cites detainees held without charge at
Guantanamo Bay as a potential example. If these detainees have information we
havent been able to extract that could prevent another 9/11, I think most
Americans would agree that we should be doing whatever it takes to extract it.
Silberman also quotes Paul Root Wolpe, a senior fellow at the Center for Bioethics at
the University of Pennsylvania, who describes the accelerated advances in fMRI as
a textbook example of how something can be pushed forward by the convergence
of basic science, the government directing research through funding, and special
interests who desire a particular technology. Are we to believe that with the implied
capability to scan jurors brains, the judiciary, the accused and the defendant alike,
influencing one at the expense of the other, that the legal implications alone of
mind-accessing scanners on university campuses, would not rouse the Minister for
Justice from his bench to say a few words about these potential mind weapons?

So what of the ethical debate called for by
the busy scientists and the Guardians science reporter? Can this technology- more
powerful in subverting thought itself than anything in prior history really be
confined to deciding whether the ubiquitously invoked terrorist has had the serious
intention of blowing up the train, or whether it was perhaps a foolish prank to make
a bomb out of chapatti flour? 
We can assume that the government
would certainly not give the go-ahead to the Science Museum Exhibition, linked to
Imperial College, a major government-sponsored institution in laser-physics, if it was
detrimental to surveillance programs. It is salutary to bear in mind that government
intelligence research is at least ten years ahead of any public
disclosure. 
It is implicit from history that whatever
affords the undetectable entry by the gatekeepers of society into the brain and
mind, will not only be sanctioned, but funded and employed by the State, more
specifically by trained operatives in the security forces, given powers over
defenceless citizens, and unaccountable to them.
The actual technology which is now said to
be honing the technique to distinguish between passing thoughts and genuine
intentions is described by Professor John-Dylan Haynes in the Guardian in the most
disarmingly untechnical language which must surely not have been intended to
enlighten.
The Guardian piece ran as
follows:
A team of world-leading neuroscientists
has developed a powerful technique that allows them to look deep inside a persons
brain and read their intentions before they act.
The research breaks controversial new
ground in scientists ability to probe peoples minds and eavesdrop on their
thoughts, and raises serious ethical issues over how brain-reading technology may
be used in the future.
Using the scanner, we could look around
the brain for this information and read out something that from the outside there's
no way you could possibly tell is in there. It's like shining a torch around, looking for
writing on a wall, said John-Dylan Haynes at the Max Planck Institute for Human
Cognitive and Brain Sciences in Germany, who led the study with colleagues at
University College London and Oxford University.
We know therefore that they are using
light, but fMRI has been used for many years to attempt the unravelling of neuronal
activity, and while there have been many efforts to record conscious and
unconscious processes, with particular emphasis on the visual cortex, there has
been no progress into consciousness itself. We can be sure that we are not being
told the real story.
Just as rats and chimpanzees have been
used to demonstrate findings from remote experiments on humans, electrode
implants used on cockroaches to remotely control them, lasers used to steer fruit-
flies , and worms engineered so that their nerves and muscles can be controlled
with pinpricks of light, the information and techniques that have been ruthlessly
forged using opportunistic onslaughts on defenceless humans as guinea pigs - used
for myriad purposes from creating 3D haptic gloves in computer games to creating
artificial intelligence to send visual processing into outer space - require appropriate
replication for peer group approval and to meet ethical demands for scientific and
public probity.
The use of light to peer into the brain is
almost certainly that of terahertz, which occurs in the wavelengths which lie
between 30mm and 1mm of the electromagnetic spectrum. Terahertz has the ability
to penetrate deep into organic materials, without (it is said) the damage associated
with ionising radiation such as x-rays. It can distinguish between materials with
varying water content for example fat versus lean meat. 
These properties lend themselves to
applications in process and quality control as well as biomedical imaging. Terahertz
can penetrate bricks, and also human skulls. Other applications can be learnt from
the major developer of terahertz in the UK, Teraview, which is in Cambridge, and
partially owned by Toshiba.
Efforts to alert human rights groups about
the loss of the mind as a place to call your own, have met with little discernible
reaction, in spite of reports about over decades of the dangers of remote
manipulation using technology to access the mind, Dr Nick Begichs book,
Controlling the human mind, being an important recent
contribution. 
A different approach did in fact,
elicit a response. When informed of the use of terahertz at Heathrow and Luton
airports in the UK to scan passengers, the news that passengers would be revealed
naked by a machine which looked directly through their clothes produced a small,
but highly indignant, article in the spring 2007 edition of the leading human rights
organisation, Liberty. 
If the reading of the mind met with no
protest, seeing through ones clothes certainly did. It seems humans assumption of
the mind as a private place has been so secured by evolution that it will take a
sustained battle to convince the public that, through events of which we are not yet
fully informed, such former innocence has been lost.
Trained light, targeted atomic
spectroscopy, the use of powerful magnets to absorb moisture from human tissues,
the transfer of radiative energy these have replaced the microwave harassment
which was used to transmit auditory messages directly into the hearing. With the
discovery of light to disentangle thousands of neurons and encode signals from the
complex circuitry of the brain, present programs will not even present the
symptoms which simulated schizoid states. Medically, even if terahertz does not
ionize, we do not yet know how the sustained application of intense light will affect
the delicate workings of the brain and how cells might be damaged, dehydrated,
stretched, obliterated.
This year, 2007, has also brought the news
that terahertz lasers small enough to incorporate into portable devices had been
developed.
Sandia National Laboratories in the US in
collaboration with MIT have produced a transmitter-receiver (transceiver) that
enables a number of applications. In addition to scanning for explosives, we may
also assume their integration into hand-held communication systems. These
semiconductor devices have output powers which previously could only be obtained
by molecular gas lasers occupying cubic meters and weighing more than 100kg, or
free electron lasers weighing tons and occupying buildings. 
As far back as 1996 the US Air Force
Scientific Advisory Board predicted that the development of electromagnetic energy
sources would open the door for the development of some novel capabilities that
can be used in armed conflict, in terrorist/hostage situations, and in training and
new weapons that offer the opportunity of control of an adversary can be
developed around this concept.
The surveillance technology of today is the
surveillance of the human mind and, through access to the brain and nervous
system, the control of behaviour and the bodys functions. The messaging of
auditory hallucinations has given way to silent techniques of influencing and
implanting thoughts. 
The development of the terahertz
technologies has illuminated the workings of the brain, facilitated the capture of
emitted photons which are derived from the visual cortex which processes picture
formation in the brain, and enabled the microelectronic receiver which has, in turn,
been developed by growing unique semi-conductor crystals. 
In this way, the technology is now in place
for the detection and reading of spectral signatures of gases. All humans emit
gases. Humans, like explosives, emit their own spectral signature in the form of a
gas. With the reading of the brains electrical frequency, and of the spectral gas
signature, the systems have been established for the control of populations and
with the necessary technology integrated into a cell-phone.
We are very optimistic about working in
the terahertz electromagnetic spectrum, says the principal investigator of the
Terahertz Microelectronics Transceiver at Sandia: This is an unexplored area, and a
lot of science can come out of it. We are just beginning to scratch the surface of
what THz can do ****************to improve national security.'******************(You
know, like we attacked Iraq because of 9/11! We need a real ID Act because
of terrorists masquerading as Americans. The Military Commissions Act is
needed so the president can become a dictator to control the terrorists roaming our
streets......Yeah, Yeah, Yeah! Tome) 
Carole Smith was born and educated in
Australia, where she gained a Bachelor of Arts degree at Sydney University. She
trained as a psychoanalyst in London where she has had a private practice. In
recent years she has been a researcher into the invasive methods of accessing
minds using technological means, and has published papers on the
subject.
She has written the first draft of a book
entitled: "The Controlled Society".The ethical implications of building machines to
read people's minds, DISSENT, Issue 25, <A
href="http://www.dissent.com.au/index.htm" target=_blank>http://www.dissent.com.au/index.htm</A> 
 
BI POLAR MOOD DIAGNOSIS
Updated Sunday, September 27, 2009

12:32 PM <a style="font-weight: bold; color:
rgb(0, 0, 204);" target="_blank" href="http://www.cchr.org/#/faq/about-cchr"
class="RE">CCHR - Citizens Commission for Human Rights</a> Confirms Psychiatric Abuses from <a style="font-weight:
bold; color: rgb(0, 0, 204);" target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/complaint-to-
citizens-commission-on-human-rights-for-psychiatric-abuses-file-on-august-4-
2009.pdf" class="RE">Complaint filed on August 8, 2009 (Click Here to View
Complaint).</a> <div style="text-align: justify;"> As litigation progresses throught the courts, Stan J. Caterbone and
Advanced Media Group, appearing as pro se, will be working with CCHR involving
their complaints against Lancaster General Hospital (LGH); Lancaster Regional
Medical Center; Dr. Emily Presley; Dr. Anthony Mastropietro; and various others that
have already been named in complaints as
DEFENDANTS. </div> Email of Thursday, September
24, 2009: "Dear Mr. Caterbone, <div
style="text-align: justify; font-family: Verdana;"><div style="text-align:
justify;">We would like to thank you for sending your psychiatric
abuse report to the Citizens Commission on Human Rights International (CCHR).
After reviewing your information, it is evident that
you experienced many psychiatric abuses. However, it has been
determined that CCHR is unable to take any action on the information.
 Unless you request otherwise, your confidential information will remain
on file with CCHR and could potentially be used in the future. For instance, because
we receive hundreds of abuse reports each year, it is possible that other people
might file reports on the same practitioner or facility. CCHR can use such data to
show a pattern of abuse. Please understand that CCHR is not a law
enforcement or legal agency in any way. We are not an attorney referral service,
cannot bring lawsuits against individuals and do not have law enforcement powers.
However, we do work with such officials by gathering information such as yours,
filing complaints, offering research and other assistance.
 </div></div> <a
href="http://www.cchr.org/#/home" class="RE">CCHR Intl, 6616 Sunset Blvd.,
Hollywood, CA 90028,</a> humanrights@cchr.org
 Sincerely, Lura Schmiedeke, Abuse Case
Documenter" <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"> THE FOLLOWING PSYCHIATRIC PROFESSIONALS
HAVE ALL REFUSED TO PROVIDE ME WITH AN ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION OVER THE
PAST SEVERAL YEARS: <ul style="text-align: justify;"><li> 1. In June of 2007 Judge James P. Cullen and the Lancaster County
District Attorney's ORDERED through the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas
Case No. 06-3179 a psychological and psychiatric evaluation as a condition of the
pre-sentence investigation. Ann Woodland first met with me and would not
complete the psychological evaluation. I have a recording of this meeting, which
was recorded with her permission. Then Judge James P. Cullen issued an ORDER for
a psychiatric evaluation. I had met with Dr. Gotlieb, who heads the psychiatric
department of the Lancaster General Hospital. He recused himself due to my
litigation against LGH. The Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas failed to find
another mental health professional that was willing to perform the
evaluation.</li><li>2. Ann Woodland refused me a psychological
evaluation per your request earlier this summer, without
explanation.</li><li>3. Dr. Ann Davis, or her secretary, merely assaulted
me with harassment when I personally visited her office for an appointment, similar
to what you and Dr. Breux did to me on June 3, 2009 in the Office of Student
Affairs.</li><li>4. Dr. Al Shulz, whom was engaged in my case prior,
had stood me up on at least three meetings this year, after we had agreed on a
location and times while at mass at St. Mary's Catholic Church earlier this
year.</li><li>5. In April of 2009 I applied for disability benefits
claiming Mind Control symptoms with the Social Security Administration. The
medical investigator in Baltimore assured me, at my request, that I would receive a
psychiatric evaluation. It never happened. I was awarded benefits on August 20,
2009 with the determination date of my disability as December of 2005, the month
that I testified that I became telepathic.</li><li>6. On July 20, 2009 I was interviewed in the Intermediate Intensive Care
Unit by Dr. Leo Dorzynski pursuant to the 302 Petition for Psychiatric Evaluation
served upon me on the evening before by the Lancaster City Police Department and
signed by Officer McCardie. Dr. Leo Dorzynski refused to see me on any basis
to follow up with my allegations of Mind Control. Dr. Leo Dorzinski certified
that I was not a threat to myself or others and refused to cooperate with the
petitioners of the 302. In a desperate move to keep the illusion of mental
illness alive, Dr. Leo Dorzinski reached far and for the first time put the term
"marijuana psychosis" in my chart; after declaring that I was not suffering from Bi
Polar Mood/Manic Depression or Schizophrenia. Dr. Leo Dorzinski proved that
the 302 Petition by the Lancaster City Police Department was a fraud and
fabrication. I had emergency surgery a few hours later and was released
from Lancaster General Hospital the following day.</li><li>7. On July 21, 2009 at the request of Dr. Leo
Dorzinski, Dr. Sean Coldren of Lancaster General Hospital interviewed me for a
second opinion and concluded the same as Dr. Leo Dorzinski, with the exception of
the "marijuana psychosis". Dr. Sean Coldren would also have nothing to do
with me after leaving Lancaster General Hospital as far as any outpatient therapy or
evaluations. Both psychiatrists, formerly M.D. were told about the directed
energy devices or electronic weapons and the pain from the assaults; as well as me
being telepathic and the harassment. I also disclosed of U.S. Sponsored Mind
Control Programs to both psychiatrists; as well as all medical staff, including
Emergency Room Personnel. </li></ul> <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;">Friday, February 27,
2009 10:54:31 AM <div
align="center"> <address>FRAUDULENT SUICIDE
ALLEGATION</address></div> <div
align="center"> <address>OF
FEBRUARY 19, 2005</address></div> Items from the <a class="RE"
target="_blank">Amended Complaint of Case No. 05-2288 in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania</a> , under Federal Judge Mary A.
McLaughlin. 276. On
February 19th, 2005, at approximately 5:00am, Officer Fedor pounded on the
Plaintiffs front door to awaken him. The Plaintiff refused to open the door and let
the Officer in due to the preceding incidents and went into his bathroom and called
the Pennsylvania State Police. The Pennsylvania State Police refused to answer the
plea for help to intervene in the altercations with the Southern Regional Police
Department. 277.
Approximately 20 minutes later, Officer Fedor and Pamela Pflumm illegally entered
into the residence of the Plaintiff by breaking and entering. 278. Officer Fedor stated he was responding
to a 911 call about an attempted suicide. The Plaintiff tried to tell Officer Fedor that
he did not know what he was talking about. Officer Fedor handcuffed the Plaintiff
and was physically abusive by pushing and shoving the Plaintiff directly in front of
the Plaintiffs loveseat and handcuffing the Plaintiff. Officer Fedor asked him why he
sent an email to Kerry Egan threatening to commit suicide. Pamela Pflumm was
standing in front of the Plaintiffs back door. The Plaintiff kept trying to tell Officer
Fedor that he came home and was sleeping all night. The Plaintiff and Officer Fedor
kept arguing about an incident that never occurred. Officer Fedor violated several
civil rights of the Plaintiff. 279. Officer Fedor stated the Kerry Egan (<a class="RE"
href="http://www.selectsecurity.com/" target="_blank">daughter of Lancaster
Businessman Patrick Egan, owner of Select Security and member of the Lancaster
Township Volunteer Fire Company and the Lancaster City Police Department</a>),
made a call to 911 at approximately 4:00 am and stated that she received an email
from the Plaintiff early that morning with a threat to commit suicide. The Plaintiff
called Comcast cable during the altercation to try to get an activity list of the
Plaintiffs online activities to prove that the Plaintiff did not send any email to Kerry
Egan. Officer Fedor slandered and libeled the Plaintiff by not believing his account.
The Plaintiff kept asking why Pamela Pflumm was summoned to the Plaintiffs home
and received no explanation. The Plaintiff did not see Pamela Pflumm before that
she entered the residence with Officer Fedor. 280. It was later determined that there
never was an email, and the Southern Regional Police Department never withdrew
their allegations of mental health issues. <hr> Wednesday,
February 18, 2009 9:11:11 AM (AUTHENTIC
DOCUMENT) ST. JOSEPH HOSPITAL
 (LANCASTER REGIONAL MEDICAL
CENTER) Lancaster, Pa. RECORD OF HISTORY
AND PHYSICAL EXAMINATION <address>Attending Physician: J. A. Schulz,
M.D. &
nbsp; </address> <address>Patient: Stanley J.
Caterbone</address> <address>Date: September 11,
1987


 </address> <address>Admission Date: September 9,
1987</address> CHIEF COMPLAINT: Bipolar mood
disorder. HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: This
patient was admitted after family had arranged for bail and the patient agreed to
come into the hospital voluntarily for inpatient psychiatric
treatment. [This is an outright
lie. I was told it was required in order to be released from
prison. <a class="RE"
target="_blank">See Amended Complaint in U.S. District Court 05-cv-2288.]
</a> He had been placed in jail
for breaking into an office. The office involved was the patients place of
employment. [Financial Management
Group, Ltd. (FMG), Executive Vice President; Secretary; Board of Directors;
Founder/FMG Advisory Group, Ltd., President; Secretary]
 The patient maintains, he is still currently
employed. The other party [Robert
Kauffman and Michael Hartlett; partners in FMG] is
maintaining that the patient is no longer employed and is guilty of illegal breaking
and entering. [All 7 criminal charges brought about by the Manhiem Township
Police Department were all dismissed several months later without any court
proceedings (nolle pros/withdrawn) <a class="RE"
target="_blank">See Amended Complaint in U.S. District Court 05-cv-2288 for False
Arrests .]</a> His current problem is several months in
duration. I had received calls on several occasions from concerned
friends and family. (<a class="RE"
href="http://www.lcswma.org/srmanagers.asp" target="_blank">James Warner (Current Executive Director of the
Lancaster County Solid Waste Managment Authority, Click
Here); </a>Mary
Lynn Diapolo (former personal secretary at Financial Management Group, Ltd.,,; Jere
Sullivan, former friend and former employee of United Chem Con who set up
meeting with Larry Resch of International Signal & Control (ISC) on June 23,
1987; et al) They had stated
that the patient was not himself; he had become involved in what appeared to be
very grandiose business schemes, talking about producing a movie
<a class="RE"
href="http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/" target="_blank">[See SONY
Joint Venture on
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com]</a>,</st
rong> having bought a home at the New Jersey
shore. [a lease purchase agreement
was made for the office for the <a class="RE"
target="_blank">SONY Joint Venture and the Lease was paid in full in the previous
May </a> The option to purchase was never executed.], having bought an airplane [The airplane was purchased and the charter business was
profitable in the first month].
 The patient had become embroiled in legal disputes with
the company which he had had a major role in setting up last year.
Apparently ha had somewhat disengaged from involvement with the
company <a
class="RE" href="http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/gpage17.html"
target="_blank">[Legally and technically locked out; See Amended Complaint in
U.S. District Court 05-cv-2288], </a>to be involved in his
other business ventures. He presently maintains that he is
the victim of a plot to illegally extrude him from the company and steal his rightful
return from this business venture <a class="RE"
target="_blank">[Legally and technically locked out; See Amended Complaint in
U.S. District Court 05-cv-2288].</a> In addition, he is apparently
planning litigation with the bank (Commonwealth/Mellon) [See
Amended Complaint in U.S. District Court 05-cv-2288] , who withdrew credit
from his having bought an airplane before he had defaulted on payment of the
loan. <a class="RE"
target="_blank">[Plane was repossessed prior to any payments being due or any
defaults; See Amended Complaint in U.S. District Court 05-cv-2288].
</a> The patient apparently lost considerable money when he
could not maintain payments on the house that he had bought at the New Jersey
shore [a lease
purchase agreement was made for the office for the SONY Joint Venture and the
Lease was paid in full in the previous May The option to purchase was never
executed.] . The family called several times, expressing concern that he was
making judgments that were not in his best interests, that he was angry and
irascible in a way that was not at all himself. It appeared that the
patient was suffering a manic episode. PAST MEDICAL/FAMILY/SOCIAL
HISTORY: The facts are that Stanley J.
Caterbone had never formally been under the care of any psychiatrists or
psychologists prior to the incidents of August 13, 1987 at Burdette Tomlin Medical
Facility Emergency Room for the fraudulent suicide allegation and the
above. Any meetings with Dr. A. J. Schulz prior to the above date
were just that there was never any billings or charges from Dr. A. J. Schulz for his
advise on treating the harassment by partners Kauffman and Hartlett.
Dr. A.J. Schulz was a client of Stan J. Caterbone for years and a personal friend of the
familys; brother Tom had been dating daughter Meg for
years. [THERE
WAS NO MANIC EPISODE IN 1987 OR IN ANY YEAR - HENCE NO BIPOLAR MOOD
DISORDER; ANY EMOTIONAL DISTRESS IN 1986 IS A MOOT SUBJECT BEING THAT IT
WAS NOT RECURRING AND WAS NEVER ANYTHING MORE THAN THAT.
THERE WERE NO DAYS MISSED FROM WORK; HOURS SPENT SLEEPING; OR
ANY SUICIDAL IDEATIONS. THEY WERE FABRICATED TO SUPPORT THEIR
DIAGNOSIS.] 
 <hr> <address></address> <div
align="center"> <address><a class="RE"
hospital-dr-pressley-documents-september-3-2007.pdf"
target="_blank">LANCASTER GENERAL
HOSPITAL</a></address> <address><a class="RE"
hospital-dr-pressley-documents-september-3-2007.pdf" target="_blank">Date of Evaluation April 6, 2006 (Click Here to View Notes and
Memos for Litigation)
</a></address> <address> </address></div> <address>Saturday, February 14, 2009 11:00:42 AM
</address> <address> </address> <address>H&P Conference April 6, 2006
12:03</address> <address>Pressley DO, Emily
M</address> <address> </address> <address><fo
nt face="Verdana">PRESENTING PROBLEM/CHIEF
COMPLAINT</address> <address>I
dont know why Im here. Everyone is
lying.</address> <address> </address> HISTORY OF PRESENTING
ILLNESSThe patient is a 47-year-old single male admitted on a 302
petition initiated by Conestoga Police. According to the petition, the
patient has been acting in a bizarre manner and has also been threatening.
The patient has been calling the police, reporting that belongings have been stolen
from his home. He also was reporting that someone was firing a gun at his
home. According to the police he was confrontational with them, clenching
his fist. The patient had also gone to the Harrisburg International Airport and
told people there that he was the business manager for singer, Sheryl Crow, and
then left the property but returned and then barricaded himself in his
vehicle. The patient also approached women on a walk and became involved
in a verbal altercation with them, and harassment charges were brought. In
addition, the patient had entered a local restaurant walked through the dining room,
and threatened 6 people that he was going to rob and kill them and their
children. The
patient denies all items on this petition, and he states that really the officer
(Buser/Fedor) had been abusing him. He states he has multiple law
suits against the police and against family members. He shows various
papers in his possession, and he makes reference to libel slander and brutality
suits. He states that he intends to take these complaints to the district
attorney. The
patient denies any mental health issues, although he does report that about 10
years ago he was treated for depression with lithium, and he was admitted to St.
Joseph Hospital in 1987. He reports that he is sleeping well and
eating well. He states that he is the president of Advanced Media Group
which represents music and entertainment
concerns. <address>HISTORY OF PAST SUICIDAL
BEHAVIOR</address> <address>Denied. He denies any suicidal thinking at this
time.</address> <address>HISTORY OF PAST PHYSICAL OR SEXUAL
AGGRESSION</address> <address>He denies making threats at any
time.</address> <address>HISTORY OF CHEMICAL
DEPENDENCY</address> <address>He drinks socially. He uses marijuana
occasionally. He smokes 1 pack of cigarettes per
day.</address> <address>TRUAMA
HISTORY</address> <address>He
claims to have been abused by police. He denies any abuse as a
child.</address> <address>PAST PSYCHIATRIC
HISTORY</address> <address>He
was admitted to St. Joseph Hospital (Lancaster Regional Medical Center) in
1987. He has a remote history of Lithium
therapy.</address> <address>CURRENT THERAPIST/
PSYCHIATRIST/TREATMENT</address> <address>No recent
therapist.</address> <address>MEDICAL REVIEW OF
SYMPTOMS</address> <address>He
has problems with back pains and a pulled groin in the past but has no complaints
of these currently.</address> <address>PAST MEDICAL
HISTORY</address> <address>Unremarkable.</address> <address>FAMILY
HISTORY</address> <address>One
brother committed suicide and he believes another brother was murdered, but
authorities called it a suicide. He is investigating
this.</address> <address>CURRENT MEDICATIONS
</address> <address>None.</address> <address>PAST PSYCHIATRIC
MEDICATIONS</address> <address>Wellbutrin and
Lithium.</address> <address>ALLERGIES/ADVERSE
REACTIONS</address> <address>None known.</address> <address>SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
HISTORY</address> <div
align="justify"> <address>The patient lives
alone. He has never been married. He has no children.
He has a college degree in business administration. He states that he has
had many jobs with the government and now owns his own corporation; whether
this is in fact true is unknown. He has family living in Texas and Florida, but
has no contact with them and says that he has legal problems with
them.</address></div> <address>MENTAL STUS
EXAMINATION</address> <address>Appearance/Behavior/Speech: He is well groomed.
He is guarded, defensive, and irritable. His speech is connected and goal
directed with evidence of some paranoid and grandiose
thinking.</address> <address>Orientation: Alert and oriented x
3.</address> <address>Language:
Intact.</address> <address>Memory: (3/3
Objects: Intact.</address> <address>Fund of
Knowledge: Good.</address> <address>Judgment and Insight:
Poor.</address> <address>Thought
Content: He denies auditory or visual hallucinations. He does
not appear to be
preoccupied.</address> <address>PHYSICAL
EXAMINATION</address> <address>Abnormal Movements:
None.</address> <address>Gait and
Station: Within normal
limits.</address> <address>Muscle
Strength and Tone: Within normal limits.</address> <address>Vital Signs: Temperature 97.4, blood pressure
114/68 pulse 67, respirations
20.</address> <address>SIGNIFICANT LABORATORY
STUDIES</address> <address>Urine
drug screen is negative. The patient is refusing all other laboratory
studies, stating he does not have insurance and he does not intend to pay for
them.</address> <address>CASE FORMULATION/DIFFERENTIAL
DIAGNOSIS</address> <div
align="justify"> <address>The patient is a 47-
year-old male with presumed history of bipolar disorder who present with bizarre
behavior, grandiose thoughts, and threats against other
people.</address></div> <address>DSM IV-R
DIAGNOSIS</address> <address>Axis I:
 Bipolar
disorder, mixed type.</address> <address>Axis
II:
Deferred.</address> <address>Axis
III: None
Known.</address> <address>Axis
IV:
Moderate.</address> <address>Axis
V: Global
Assessment of Functioning (GAF):
35.</address> <address>RECOMMENDATIONS/INITIAL TREATMENT
PLAN</address> <div align="justify"> <address>The patient will be maintained on a 302 petition, and a 303
hearing will be held. The patient is refusing medication, laboratory
studies, and to really engage in the program at this time. He will be
encouraged to engage the
treatment.</address></div> <address>Emily M. Pressly,
DO</address> <address>Psychiatry
and Behavioral Medicine</address> Job ID #:
4121822 <hr> Saturday, February 21, 2009 11:59:51
AM <div align="center"> <address>Burdette Tomlin Memorial
Hospital</address></div> <div
align="center"> <address>Route 9,
Stone Harbor Blvd.</address></div> <div
align="center"> <address>Cape
May Courthouse, N.J. 08216</address></div> <div
align="center"> <address> </address></div> <address><stro
ng>Emergency Services
Report</address> <address>Cape Counseling
Services</address> <address>August 11, 1987 10:40 pm Discharge August
12, 1987 12:49 am</address> <address>Emergency Room
Visit</address> <address> </address> <address><fo
nt face="Verdana">Name: Stan
Caterbone</address> <address> &n
bsp; 554 Berkley
Road</address> <address> &n
bsp; Stone Harbor, New
Jersey</address> <address> &n
bsp; (609) 967-
5184</address> <address> </address> <address><fo
nt face="Verdana">Discharge: Consulted with Dr. Hahkin, who also spoke with
patient. He concurred that patient was rational and not presenting any
danger to himself or others. Patient was discharged on own
recognizance.</address> <address> </address> <div
align="justify"> <address>I) Presenting
Problem </address></div> <div
align="justify"> <address>
</address> <address> "Stan was brought to ER by
two brothers & police. Police recieved a call from Jim Warner (717-872-
9081 [My phone number at 2323 New Danville Pike, Conestoga, PA.]
who told them that he believed Stan planned to take a gun, go to the
beach & kill himself. Client (Stan Caterbone) denied any such
statement, thought or plans. He has legal difficulties; financial deals which
have fallen through; movie venture with SONY and Bon Jovi's Band; license to do
financial planning, his business revoked; repossessed material goods (airplane);
being blackmailed; says he is a film executive and producer; and several major
financial deals into which he had invested personal funds fell through - but NO
PROBLEMS! Denied any
depression."</address> <address> </address></div> <address>II) Appearance and
Behavior</address> <div
align="justify"> <ol> <li> <address>Physical Characteristics - Appears stated; poised; Normal
Gait.</address></li> <li> <address>Dress Grooming - Neat and
groomed.</address></li> <li> <address>Motor Activity -
Restless.</address></li> <li> <address>Facies - Mobile;
Direct.</address></li> <li> <address>Attitude Toward Examiner - Defensive; Hostile;
Evasive/guarded.</address></li></ol></div> III)
Affect/Mood <ol> <li> <div
align="justify">Affect - Content
congruent.</div></li> <li> <div align="justify">Mood - Angry, Irritable;
Agitated.</div></li> <li> <div
align="justify">Speech - Loud; Normal Tone; No
impediments.</div></li> <li> <div
align="justify">Thought Process - Rational; Impaired
Reality.</div></li> <li> <div align="justify">Other - Somewhat denies drug
problem.</div></li> <li> <div
align="justify">Thought Content and
Preoccupations - "Wants to sue everyone for blackmail especially for
repossessed airplane."</div></li> <li> <div
align="justify">Delusions -
Grandiose; Persecutory.</div></li> <li> <div
align="justify">Perception -
None.</div></li> <li> <div align="justify">Suicidal - "Denied suicidal ideation despite his history of
family mental illness. Key factor was his desire to go to California; ostensibly
to 1) Consult with his attorneys (Capello & Folley) or 2) for a "vacation".
However, he had a brother who killed himself in California. Denied ever
having suicidal thoughts despite significant financial/legal problems & his
brothers assertion that he had talked about this when
depressed."</div></li> <li> <div
align="justify">Sensorium - Time; Place;
Person.</div></li> <li> <div align="justify">Concentration/Calculations - Serial 7s - Rapidly;
Accurately.</div></li> <li> <div
align="justify">Memory -
Intact.</div></li> <li> <div align="justify">Fund of Knowledge - Above
Average.</div></li> <li> <div
align="justify">Intelligence - Above
Average.</div></li> <li> <div
align="justify">Judgment -
Impaired.</div></li> <li> <div
align="justify">Insight - Denial of
Illness.</div></li> <li> <div align="justify">Current Drug and Alcohol Use - Non
Legible.</div></li> <li> <div align="justify">Previous Drug and Alcohol Treatment -
N/A.</div></li> <li> <div align="justify">Current Living Situation - Presently living with a friend (roommate
in Stone Harbor; primary residence is in Lancaster, Pennsylvania (possibly with
female, but not likely)</div></li> <li> <div
align="justify">History of Mental Illness in Family -
Father diagnosed as schizophrenic - in and out of mental institutions. Brother
also diagnosed as schizophrenic; committed suicide 1984; Client was diagnosed
bipolar, manic, last October - went off
lithium.</div></li> <li> <div align="justify">Significant Life Loss - Losses; family suicides; brother killed himself
Christmas day of 1984; Financial and Legal problems
recently.</div></li> <li> <div align="justify">Support System - Yolanda Caterbone, Mother, (717) 872-9081 [My
phone number at 2323 New Danville Pike, Conestoga,
PA.].</div></li> <li> <div align="justify">Significant Developmental History - client had been making
$100,000/year as a Financial Manager and series of setbacks have left him
bankrupt, yet apparently has resources to put $20,000 down on a home in Stone
Harbor [home/office for Digital Movie; was a lease-purchase with rental paid in full
for May 1, 1987 thru to September 31,
1987].</div></li></ol> IV) Current
Medication <ol> <li> <div
align="justify">Lithium prescribed by Dr. Shulz,
Lancaster, PA.</div></li> <li> <div
align="justify">Provisional Diagnostic Impression
(DSM III) - Bipolar, manic, w/o psychotic features or Mixed Substance Abuse,
continuous (Client refused wine & blood
screen).</div></li></ol> V) Preliminary Treatment and Disposition
Recommendations: Met with both client and family,
consulted with social services on call, worker Carol Lubiana, Stone Harbor Police, Dr.
Van Pelt, and Dr. Hahkin. Had Dr. Hahkin speak with client over the phone
& scheduled appointment with him for tomorrow at 11 am. [DID NOT
ATTEND, INSTEAD WENT TO GET COPY OF THIS
REPORT]. <ol> <li> <div
align="justify">Psychiatric
Evaluation</div></li> <li> <div
align="justify">Drug Screen &
Evaluation.</div></li></ol> Client signed written contract agreeing not to kill self, to call me if
he became suicidal at anytime. (Mini-mental status also
advised). <hr> <div
align="center"> <address> Dr.
Albert J. Schulz, M.D. Audio Recorded Meeting of January 14,
1998</address></div> <div
align="center"> <address> </address></div> <div
align="center"> <address> </address></div> <div
align="justify"> <address>
During this time, in late 1997 and early 1998 - Stan J. Caterbone AGAIN
started working with two (2) attorneys to look into issues surrounding the 1987
whistleblowing allegations and all of the civil and criminal violations surrounding
those activities. The two attorneys were local attorney Mr. Matt Samley, of
then Xekelis, Reese, and Pugh, who represented Pflumm Contractors, Inc., and Ms.
Christina Rainville, the Philadelphia attorney who represented Lisa Michelle
Lambert. </address> <address> </address> <address> Mr. Matt Samley said there was
nothing to my allegations and actually said that I was convicted and did prison time
for the 1987 false arrests in 1987 when in fact ALL
charges were dismissed; and Ms. Christina Rainville reported after reviewing
documents that the firm of Schneider Harrison had just barred her from
representing any more clients from Lancaster County (McCrakken and
Lambert).</address></div> Stan J. Caterbone Hey Al.. How ya doing?
 Dr.
Albert J. Schulz, M.D. - Got lika
cold. Stan J. Caterbone You do have a cold. You
dont sound too good. Dr. Albert J. Schulz, M.D.. I got a call from Fr.
Lavelle, he is worried about you. Stan J. Caterbone Why is that?
 Dr. Albert J.
Schulz, M.D.. - He doesnt think you are feeling
well. Stan J.
Caterbone Why would he think that? Did you read anything I
gave you? Dr. Albert J. Schulz, M.D. Yea, I read it. Ah It is an
argument I am sure you have been through hell with all of that.
You dont really need to get into all of that. You are becoming obsessed with
it. Stan
J. Caterbone Now wait, who is saying I am obsessed with it?
 I am just trying to resolve the issues, Al.
 Dr. Albert J.
Schulz, M.D. Okay. Stan J. Caterbone Why are there attorneys for
everyone else but me? Why is there justice for everyone else but me?
 That is what I dont
understand. Dr. Albert J. Schulz, M.D. What I would like
to do is add another medicine to even you out. Stan J. Caterbone No I am not
adding another medicine, I am fine. No I am not adding anymore
medicine. Dr.
Albert J. Schulz, M.D. Then why did you come
here. Stan J.
Caterbone Because it is my quarterly update. Dr. Albert J. Schulz, M.D. Thats All?
 Stan J.
Caterbone Sure. Dr. Albert J. Schulz, M.D. Okay,
well. Stan J.
Caterbone What else would I be doing here. Dr. Albert J. Schulz, M.D. You are not
doing well, I have to tell you. Stan J. Caterbone Well thats your opinion
Al. I got my blood test yesterday (St. Joseph Hospital/Lancater
Regional Medical Center Lab). Dr. Albert J. Schulz, M.D. . (Calling St.
Joseph Hospital Laboratory/Lancater Regional Medical Center) Dr. Al
Shulz, I need the results of a syrum lithium that was done yesterday on
outpatient Stan J. Caterbone Caterbone, Oh Im sorry. What is it?
Sure. Dr. Al Shulz, I need the results of a lithium level done yesterday
on outpatient Stan J. Caterbone Caterbone, he also had a THS and Creatun
screen. 9.4. Thank You. (hang up
phone). Stan J. Caterbone That is right where about it should
be. Dr. Albert J.
Schulz, M.D. I think it should be higher. The medicine you are
taking is escalith twice a day and Lithobid twice a day?
 Stan J.
Caterbone Sure. And
Wellbeutin. Dr. Albert J. Schulz, M.D. Do you take that once or
twice. Stan J.
Caterbone Once. In the
morning.. Dr. Albert J. Schulz, M.D. CR 450 daily intake is
Caterbone Why am I not myself. Dr. Albert J. Schulz, M.D. You talked
to Father Lavelle ... (Freind, fomer vice principal of Lancaster Catholic High,
and then on staff at the Catholic Church at the Diocesan of Harrisburg - Went to see
him earlier that day to complain about harassment at Pflumm Contractors,
Inc.,,). Stan J. Caterbone Al, what dont you believe?
Schulz, M.D. - I dont believe you are well. Stan J. Caterbone No, no, no, no, no,
no. Al .. Lets talk about the issues I am raising. Why wont
anyone address the issues? If I am so crazy why wont anyone point to
this and say this isnt true? This is not reality? This isnt true.
No one does that. Everyone just ignores the issues Al, Why?
 Dr.
Albert J. Schulz, M.D. No I am not ignoring the
issues. Stan J.
Caterbone Sure you are.
Albert J. Schulz, M.D. All I am saying is.. Stan J. Caterbone No, no, no, all I
am doing, Al all I am doing is raising legitimate legal
questions. Thats all, which I have a right to
do. Dr.
Albert J. Schulz, M.D. Dont raise them with me, cause I dont want to hear
them, Im not your lawyer. Stan J. Caterbone OK. Dr. Albert J. Schulz, M.D. Raise you
legal issues with your lawyer. Stan J. Caterbone I know that. I didnt raise
them with you. Dr. Albert J. Schulz, M.D.. All I am saying is that
... Stan J.
Caterbone Al, I did not raise them with you. Dr. Albert J. Schulz, M.D. I know
that . Stan J.
Caterbone I was just sharing them with you. Dr. Albert J. Schulz, M.D. You sent
that to me. Stan J. Caterbone Well Al, that is because that is what
happened when I was sick, SUPPOSEDLY?, ALLEGEDLY?
 It all happened when I was allegedly
sick. Thats why. Now the tapes do not lie.
Documents do not lie. I mean thats your opinion. Thats fine but
.. Dont sit there and tell me Im crazy. Dr. Albert J. Schulz, M.D. Well you
are not yourself. Stan J. Caterbone Then why,
again, I am asking you why? Every time, why is it ever time I go to
an attorney, I am not well? Thats three times Al. This is three
times. Dr. Albert J. Schulz, M.D. Every time, every time
you start getting mood swings you .. Stan J. Caterbone Al, the tapes dont
change for mood swings. The documents dont change,
they are the same. Dr. Albert J. Schulz, M.D.. What can I
say. Stan J.
Caterbone What if the documents are true?
 What if every thing I say, what if all of my allegations are true?
 Dr. Albert J. Schulz, M.D. Well where is it going to go?
 Where is it going to get you? Stan J. Caterbone Why is that your business Al? That is my
business. That is not your business where they
go. Dr. Albert J. Schulz, M.D.. Thats over
Caterbone I will, thank you Dr. Albert J. Schulz, M.D. But
Caterbone I will fight for the truth Al.
This is for the truth. That is all I am fighting for. If everyone is afraid
for the truth, that is on them. I did not do anything wrong. If other
people did something wrong then that is on them. I am not bearing the
burden of responsibility for that. That is all. I did nothing
wrong. I had everything taken from me. And I have rights that were
violated. It is as simple as that. It is not a big deal.
 Dr. Albert J. Schulz, M.D. As far as adding any medicine
you day no? Stan J. Caterbone I dont need anything,
No. Dr. Albert J.
Schulz, M.D. You should add .. Stan J. Caterbone And why would
you add that? Dr. Albert J. Schulz, M.D. Because you really look wound
up. Stan J.
Caterbone Do you think this conversation is wound up?
Schulz, M.D. Yes, you. Stan J. Caterbone OK. I am here for your
opinion, and that is fine. I will always Dr. Albert J. Schulz, M.D. You are
really not yourself, you are just not yourself. Stan J. Caterbone Well, when am I
myself? Am I a lower tone, more mono? Do I ask more questions, less
questions? What do you mean? Help me out
there. Dr. Albert J. Schulz, M.D. When your not obsessed with
that stuff. Stan J. Caterbone I go to work <a
class="RE" href="http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/gpage.html"
target="_blank">(Controller for Pflumm Contractors, Inc., 1993 to 1998 See
Biography)</a> ever day, and I do a helluva job at
work. Is that being obsessed? Is it? I am
asking you a question. Why am I.. why am I sane from "9 to 5" when I
work for Dave Pflumm, but in the off hours I am insane when I deal with my
issues. I dont feel upset about anything. I dont think I am
obsessed with anything, Al.. It is just my rights, Its not
... Dr. Albert J.
Schulz, M.D. It is just going to tear you apart.
 Stan J.
Caterbone Yea, and it will tear other people apart that did wrong to me,
too. That is just right. It is not going to tear me up. I
dont let it control my life, Al. Dr. Albert J. Shulz, M.D. Are
You.. How about increasing
lithium. Stan J. Caterbone Al I am really fine, I have been fine for
four years, on this. I am fine. I dont need to change just because I
see attorneys. I did not mean to offend so many people, sheesh. I
guess the hospital didnt screw up with Tommy either? Huh?
Albert J. Schulz, M.D. It doesnt help you to get into what
Tommy.. Stan J.
Caterbone He was my brother, Al. What do you mean it
doesnt help me? I am just concerned, thats all. Dont worry I have no parts
of that. That is Phil. All I want is what is mine. That is all I ever
asked for. How would you like it if you were locked out of here Al, and
you lost your career, and your money, and your home? How would you like
it? You wouldnt fight back? Any reasonable person would fight
back. Dr. Albert J. Schulz, M.D. If there is anything to get
back. Stan J. Caterbone How do you determine what there is to
get back? Dr.
Albert J. Schulz, M.D. All right, all right. Stan J. Caterbone Well no, I am just
asking a question. Dr. Albert J. Schulz, M.D. It sounds like there is nothing to
get back. Stan
J. Caterbone And who told you that? Dr. Albert J. Schulz, M.D. Nothing but
pain and misery. Stan J. Caterbone What if I have evidence otherwise?
 How would you know what I have? How do you know what
my business was? Dr. Albert J. Shulz, M.D. Its not, Im not.
The guy that brought you the most (trouble) is sitting in jail. What the
hell. Stan J. Caterbone Who? Jim Guerin?
Al, Jim Guerin has nothing to do with this. Nothing?
Albert J. Shulz, M.D. Who are the guys that did this to you?
Caterbone Al, that is up to investigators. Who violated my
rights? Who arrested me for stealing my own files out of my own
office. Lets start there. Who repossessed my airplane thirty days before my
first payment was due? Who took my business away from me?
Who took my credit, my reputation? Dr. Albert J. Schulz, M.D. Okay, so
you will not .. Stan J. Caterbone Al I thought this is America,
you fight for what is yours, you fight for what is taken from you, I mean it is not a
big complicated thing. I mean there was so much taken from
me. I have all the evidence. I have all the tapes. Its all on one
disc. Six hundred fifty documents, all the conversations. That is the factual
(evidence). It is not what I think. It is not what I perceive. That
is a fact. And that doesnt change. And that is what I go by. That is
how I make my decisions and my judgments, on the facts. It is not what I
think, or what I want to think. Its just the
facts. Dr. Albert J. Schulz, M.D. You need anymore prescriptions?
Caterbone Yea, you know what else I need, Creatin and what are the others?
 I guess I should have had them this time? I dont
really need any scripts for the meds. I need them for my insurance.
They always break them out, but. They wont give me anymore than thirty
days worth, so. Al let me ask you a question, legally has my right to enter
into contract ever been rescinded? Dr. Albert J. Schulz, M.D. - No
Caterbone So what does my mental illness have to do with anything?
Schulz, M.D. I am just telling you, you are not yourself. I cant
tell you not to do this, all Im saying it can tear you up
inside. Stan J. Caterbone Al, I know. If I stay out of
it it tears me apart. What people did to me. I get no respect. People
think I am an insane criminal. Thats not true. I have never been convicted of
anything and have been in jail five times. That is not a setup?
Albert J. Schulz, M.D. Here is your.. Stan J. Caterbone
Alright. <hr> <div align="center"> <div align="left"> <address>Wednesday, February 25, 2009 9:11:42
AM </address></div> <address>SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL (Lancaster Regional Medical
Center)</address></div> <address>Lancaster,
PA</address> <address>Continuation: Page 3




</address> <address>Name of Report: H &
P</address> <address>Name: Caterbone,
Stanley &nbs
p; Dr:
SCHULZ</address> <address> </address><
pre>CHIEF COMPLAINT; Bipolar mood
disorder.</pre> HISTORY OF
PRESENT ILLNESS: This patient was admitted after family had arranged for bail and
the patient agreed to come into the hospital voluntarily for inpatient psychiatric
treatment. He had been placed in Jail for breaking into an (his) office. The office
involved was the patient's place of employment (Financial Management Group,
Ltd.,). The patient maintains, he is still currently employed. The other party is
maintaining that the patient is no longer employed and is guilty of illegal breaking
and entering (all charges were dismissed, I was legally right). His current problem is several months in
duration. I had received calls on several occasions from concerned friends (Jim
Warner <a class="RE" href="http://www.lcswma.org/srmanagers.asp"
target="_blank">James Warner (Current
Executive Director of the Lancaster County Solid Waste Managment Authority, Click
Here); </a>Mary Lynn Diapolo (former personal
secretary at Financial Management Group, Ltd.,,; Jere Sullivan, former friend and
former employee of United Chem Con who set up meeting with Larry Resch of
International Signal & Control (ISC) on June 23, 1987; et al) and family. They
had stated that the patient was not himself he had become involved in what
appeared to be very grandiose business schemes (See Digital Movie documents
on website and blog), talking about producing a movie, having bought a home at
the New Jersey shore, having bought an airplane. The patient had become
embroiled in legal disputes with the company, which he had had a major role in
setting up last year. Apparently he had somewhat disengaged from involvement
with the company (False Statement); to be involved in his other business ventures
(All business activities sanction with full support of Board of Directors, and all
recorded in Board minutes and FMG Newsletters). He presently maintains that he is
the victim of a plot to illegally extrude him from the company and steal his rightful
return from this business venture. In addition, he is apparently planning litigation
with the bank, who withdrew credit from his having bought an airplane before he
had defaulted on payments of the load. The patient apparently lost considerable mo
e
when he could not maintain payments on the house (False Statement: Lease for
1987 was paid in full) that he had bought at the Hew Jersey shore. The family called
several times, expressing concern that he was making judgments that were not in
his best interests (False Statement: All proven to be in best interest), that he was
angry and irascible in a way that was not at all himself. It appeared that the patient
was suffering from a manic episode. PAST MEDICAL AND FAMILY HISTORY; Previous Psychiatric History,
the patient had consulted me last fall and winter. At that time, he had a serious
depression, which included suicidal ideations. I saw him several times, placed him
on Lithium. Be noted significant improvement coincident with the Lithium Carbonate
therapy. He discontinued follow-up, discontinued the Lithium, felt quite well through
the early part of the spring. At that time, the patient related that he has experienced a sub
clinical high the previous summer. Family History, positive of major psychiatric illness. Father and
brother had recurrent admissions, brother ultimately died of
suicide. Past Medical
History, the patient says that he sustained a kidney injury playing football in high
school. Education,
patient graduated from Millersville University. Work history, patient has been
involved in Financial Services For years. He initially was involved with IDS.
Ultimately, put together a company on his own. D and A history is negative. Legal
History was negative until events leading up to the patient's coming to the hos-
pital. MEDICATIONS for
ALLERGIES; Not dictated. REVIEW OP SYSTEMS; No complaints, other than the patient said
he had a URI a week or two before being admitted to this inpatient
unit. PHYSICAL
examination; (Vital signs - See Nursing Assessment) GENERAL: The patient is in no physical
distress. HEAD/EYES/EARS/NOSE/THROAT: No acute
abnormalities. NECK:
No lymphadenopathy. CHEST/LUNGS/BREASTS; Lungs clear to Auscultation.
 HEART; Regular
rhythm, no murmurs. ABDOMEN: Soft, no tenderness, no masses. PELVIC/RECTAL/GENITALIA: Rectal not
done. NEUROLOGIC/PSYCHIATRIC: No focal deficit. EXTREMITIES: Normal. MENTAL Status: The patient is cooperative;
he is totally resistant to the thought that he is suffering from any manic symptoms.
He has some pressured speech. He is obsessed and preoccupied with his litigation
involving his company and the bank loan for his airplane. The patient discounts and
discredits anyone that has expressed concern for his emotional well being. Friends
mentioned, family are all discredited, saying they really are not close to him and do
not understand what is going on. The patient also discredits me, saying that I mean
well, but that I am bias by what I have learned from friends and relatives and that I
do not understand what the patient is enduring with regard to his present legal
involvement. The patient does not have any formal thought disorder. He does not
present any secondary psychotic symptoms in the form of delusions or
hallucinations. The patient denies any suicidal ideation whatsoever and denies any
feelings of impulses to harm anyone else. He talks at length of the conspiracy
against him that will very soon be revealed by the legal action that he is taking. The
patient has no organic disturbance with regard to seamy, orientation, reasoning and
judgment. ASSESSMENT: Bipolar mood
disorder. PLAN: In view of the patient's history and response to
Lithium, he has been advised that he absolutely, at present, should be taking
Lithium carbonate. The patient adamantly denies the need for such at present,
refuses to accept the diagnosis or recommended treatment When it was first
presented in a phone conversation with the patient, it was rejected initially, was
rejected after he was admitted. The patient requested an independent psychiatric
evaluation, this has been accomplished by or. Nutter. Dr. Nutter concurs with the
diagnosis of bipolar mood disorder. He concurs with the recommended treatment of
Lithium carbonate. The patient cannot accept either. I told the patient that in view
of his inability to accept either the diagnosis or the treatment, I feel I have nothing
else to offer him in terms of keeping him in the hospital. I have requested that he
meet with myself and a family member so that I can pass on my diagnosis and
recommendations. He is willing to do this, hopes to leave the hospital after that and
is willing to leave against medical advise. <address>JAS:bk</address> <address>D:
09/11/87</address> <address>T: 09/14/87</address> <address> Signature: J.A. Schulz</address> <address> </address>
SAMMY CATERBONE
<ADDRESS>Wednesday, February 25, 2009 9:09:32

AM </ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Advanced Media Group,
Ltd.</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>An Information Technologies Company</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>I857 Colonial Village Lane</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Lancaster, PA 17601</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>717 392 7840</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>FAX 717 392 7897</ADDRESS>
October 23, 1991
<ADDRESS>California State Attorney General's Office</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>P.O. Box 94244</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Sacramento, California 94244-
2550</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS> </ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Re: Caterbone, Samuel A. 11733089 (Military ID),
Deceased</ADDRESS>
Dear Sirs:
As per the enclosed death certificate of December 25, 1984, which
states in it- #35A "Under Investigation, I am hereby formally and officially
requesting information as to the findings of that investigation.
Please understand, that in the spring of 1985, I had personally
visited the county of Santa Barbaras Public Guardian Office for the
above information, however they would did not provide any additional
information.
For the record, on December 27th, 1984 I had received a phone
call from Charles Snyder Jr., the mortician, upon receiving and examining the body
of the deceased; which arrived from Santa Barbara, California.
Mr. Snyder raised some concerns into an apparent discrepancy
with the cause of death, as stated by the Coroner, John Carpenter. Mr. Carpenter
certified that the cause of death was "Asphyxiation ligature strangulation;
Suicide - hung self with belt; Under Investigation.
Mr. Snyder stated to, in similar words, "Stan, I have a problem, the
report says that your brother hung himself, yet there are no markings on your
brothers neck, there should be some kind of marks from the bruises, there is always
some kind of markings in hanging, I can't find any marks*.
I had intimate discussions with attorney Joseph Roda, of Lancaster,
pertaining to these matters.
Most importantly, while visiting with my brother in Santa Barbara,
California, he had informed me that he was given "Bad LSD while in the service
(U.S. Airforce), and that was the reason for his mental condition.
I have always known that he had often experienced flashbacks,
and in that conversation my brother confirmed, and admitted that he often times
had experienced "flashbacks, and flashbacks are medically proven to be a
characteristic of LSD users. (It had been confirmed by another source that Samuel
Caterbone had no drug history of LSD or any hard drugs before or after his U.S.
Military Service in the U.S. Air Force).
In light of the recent information concerning alleged
"experimental drug programs administered by certain branches of the United
States Military (MK-Ultra), and the use of LSD in the respective programs, and
my intimate conversations concerning LSD with my brother, I have serious
questions regarding my brother's death.
Especially in regards to the alleged suicide; which as I have been
told by medical professionals, is impossible without any marking on the victim's
neck, if indeed asphyxiation by strangulation is the cause of death.
So that I may bring a conclusion to these issues, I would expect
information regarding the investigation, apparently conducted by Coroner Kenneth
Carpenter, be submitted to me in a timely fashion. 
I would think that I, as administering all matters regarding my
brother's death, be privilege to this information. 
Incidentally, I have had numerous fabricated allegations of
suicide, which have always been supported by the fact that my brother allegedly
committed suicide, and I would like this issue either denied or confirmed. It has
caused me a great deal of emotional duress, especially when the allegations of my
suicide were proven to be fabricated.
I may be reached at: 
<ADDRESS>Stan J. Caterbone</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>615 Wyncroft Lane #2</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>(717) 392-3682 Phone</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>(717) 392-5032 Fax</ADDRESS>
I appreciate your immediate cooperation into these sensitive matters.
Sincerely,
Enclosures
<ADDRESS>cc:</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>County of Santa Barbara, Public Guardian
Office</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Senator Bill Bradley, New Jersey</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Charles Snyder, Jr., Snyder Funeral Home</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Congressman Robert Walker, Pennsylvania</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Notary: SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS
 day of October 23, 1991</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Nichole M. Maurer, Notary Public, My Commission Expires August 2,
1993</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>
<HR>
</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS></ADDRESS>
<DIV align=center>
<ADDRESS>DEPARTMENT OF SHERIFF-
CORONER</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=center>
<ADDRESS>SANTA BARBARA
COUNTY</ADDRESS></DIV>
<ADDRESS> </ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>November 5, 1991</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Mr. Stan J. Caterbone</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>615 Wyncroft Lane #2</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17603</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Dear Mr. Caterbone,</ADDRESS>
<DIV align=justify>
<ADDRESS> &nbsp
; Your letter of October 23, 1991 regarding the death of your brother; Samuel
Caterbone on 12-25-1984 and the information contained on the death certificate,
has been referred to this office from the Santa Barbara County Public
Guardian.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<ADDRESS> </ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
; On page tow of your letter you make reference to the fact that you would expect
information regarding the Investigation to be submitted to you in a timely
fashion. I am somewhat confused by this statement in that your brother
expired almost seven (7) years ago and from the date of his death to the day I
received your letter from the Public Guardians Office, no correspondence has been
received from you regarding this matter nor have I or any other staff member been
contacted by telephone by you regarding this matter.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV align=justify>
; I further do not understand why you were not referred to this Office in the Spring
of 1985 when you personally visited the Public Guardians Office. If you
had a copy of the death certificate at that time and had questions about the case
you would have come directly to the Coroner office and discussed the matter
then.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV align=justify>
; I would like to clarify a few point with you before I answer your
questions. First of all the copy of the death certificate you enclosed is not a
complete copy; I do not understand how you obtained this copy as the cause of
death and injury information is still blank. Next, I would point out to you that
in Item #35A, the word Investigation appears no the words Under
Investigation as your letter indicates.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV align=justify>
; The complete statement in item #35 alludes to the fact that the person signing
the death certificate has conducted either an Inquest or an Investigation and that
the signer is certifying this along with the date, time and cause of death. Had
you or your funeral director obtained a completed copy of the death certificate this
data would have been included.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV align=justify>
; Lastly, Mr. John Carpenter was the elected Sheriff-Coroner of Santa Barbara County
in 1985, He did not personally conduct any investigation into the death of your
brother.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV align=justify>
; You will see that on the copy of the certificate you enclosed that the word By:
appears and then a signature preceded by Dep. Which stands for Deputy. As
sworn Deputy Sheriffs and Deputy Coroners in this County we can sign death
certificates in the name of the principal office holder.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV align=justify>
; Now, I would like to address your concerns as you have expressed them in your
letter. I have enclosed a copy of the Coroner Investigative report concerning
the death of your brother on 12-25-84. I have taken the liberty to outline
several important factors of the report in yellow.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV align=justify>
; Your brother was diagnosed as suicidal and was apparently manic
depressive. This fact was brought to our attention by staff at the facility
where he was residing at the time of his death. You stated that you were
concerned about your brother hanging himself from a door with a belt and that your
funeral director did not see any marks indicative of a hanging on the neck of your
brother.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV align=justify>
; I would like to direct you to page 2 of the report I have enclosed; outlined in yellow
is a sentence which states that the paramedic who responded to the scene saw
Caterbone hanging from a hook on the inside of the bathroom door, by a
belt. As for a mark around or upon the neck; in the next paragraph of the
coroner report is a sentence by the investigator which reads, I briefly examined the
victim and noted a discolored 1 mark around the victims neck. One last
sentence on page 2 states that the Santa Barbara Police took photographs of the
victims hanging marks. I do not know how long the police would retain
their photographs in any given case.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV align=justify>
; As for a discrepancy between what is written/stated on the death certificate of
your brother and what your funeral director and or medical professionals have
told you, there is no discrepancy because there was indeed a mark present at the
time of the investigation. I would further add that the body was
embalmed here and transported to Pennsylvania; usually embalming can actually
bring out bruises and abrasion marks, however, when these marks are not deeply
embedded in tissues but only superficial hemorrhage, embalming may eliminate the
lines of demarcation.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV align=justify>
; Your last area of concern seems to be that of LSD involvement in the death of your
brother. My response to you in that regard is that at the time of the initial
investigation into this death, NO information was received by this office from any
source that LSD was a consideration. This office had no information about
flashbacks or LSD use by your brother.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV align=justify>
; A routine toxicology screen was conducted as indicated by the enclosed copy of
that report. No usual drugs of abuse were found. Had this office
been aware of possible LSD use or abuse in your brothers case we certainly would
have tested his body fluids to see if LSD was present. Obviously, the fluids
collected at the time of your investigation in this case have long since been
destroyed.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV align=justify>
; With regard to you being privileged to this information, I would only add that if
you had contact this office seven years ago you would have received the
information then along with a copy of the coroner
report.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV align=justify>
; I am not sure that I understand you last paragraph alluding to numerous
fabricated allegations of suicide. If this is in reference to you and or your
actions I certainly cannot comment as I am completely unaware of you, your history
or anything about you. I can however attest to the fact that your brother did
take his life as indicated on the death certificate copy I have enclosed for your
reference.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV align=justify>
; The scene investigation, the observance of your brother suspended by a belt and
the mental/psychiatric history of being a manic depressive along with documented
suicidal threats all support our conclusion and classification of suicide in the death
of your brother.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV align=justify>
; I truly hope that the material I have forwarded to you will be of assistance to you
and will allow you to come to a better understanding of the circumstances
surrounding the death of your brother.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV align=justify>
; With respect to your opening paragraph wherein you formally and officially
request information as to the finding of that investigation; I can only say that
everthing provided to you here was available in 1984 at the time of Samuels death
and that since 01-03-85 when this case was finalized and completed, the
investigation ended with the case being closed and classified a suicide. No
further investigation will be conducted as there is no reason at this late date to
pursue this matter any further.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<ADDRESS>Very truly yours,</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Lawrence Gillespie</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Sr. Investigator</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Santa Barbara County</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Sheriff-Coroner Department</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>
<HR>
</ADDRESS>
<DIV align=center>
<ADDRESS>COUNTY OF SANTA
BARBARA</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=center>
<ADDRESS>TREASURER</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=center>
<ADDRESS>PUBLIC ADMINSTRATOR-
GUARDIAN</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=center>
<ADDRESS>1108 Santa Barbara Street</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=center>
<ADDRESS>Santa Barbara, California
93101</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=center>
<ADDRESS>(805) 963-7101</ADDRESS></DIV>
<ADDRESS>November 14, 1985</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Yolanda Caterbone c/o</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Mr. Stan Caterbone</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>433 West Marion Street</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Lancaster, PA 17603</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Re: Sam Caterbone</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Dear Mrs. Caterbone:</ADDRESS>
<DIV align=justify>
<ADDRESS>Since your sons (Stan J. Caterbone) visit of April 29, 1985 we have not
received your direction in regard to your sons moped.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV align=justify>
<ADDRESS>In the event that you wish the Public Administrator to handle the
disposition of the remaining property, I enclosed a letter of nomination to be signed
and returned in the enclosed stamped return envelope. However, if
we have not heard from you by December 9, 1985, we must move forward and
release the moped to the public Administrator for
handling.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<ADDRESS>Please reply at your earliest convenience.</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Very truly yours,</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>By Dixie Pilkington</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Deputy Public Guardian</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>DP:akm</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Encs. </ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>
<HR>
</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS> </ADDRESS>
SAMUEL CATERBONE, JR. (FATHER)
<ADDRESS>Wednesday, February 25, 2009 1:17:37 PM
</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Advanced Media Group</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>1250 Fremont Street</ADDRESS>
<DIV align=center>
<ADDRESS>February 26, 2008</ADDRESS></DIV>
<ADDRESS>Ms. Debbie Foch</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS><A class=RE href="http://www.disclosureproject.org/"
target=_blank>Disclosure Project </A></ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS><A class=RE href="http://www.cseti.org/programs/Trainings.htm"
target=_blank>(See Disclosure Project CSETI Remote Viewing Teachings and
Seminars)</A> </ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>PO Box 4556</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Largo, MD 20775</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Re: Email of February 22, 2008 and Accounts of Samuel Caterbone for
Dr. Steven Greer</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Dear Debbie:</ADDRESS>
<DIV align=justify>
<ADDRESS>The following is a listing of files that I have enclosed on a CD-ROM
titled Samuel Caterbone, Jr. Disclosure Project Report of February 26, 2008. I also
enclosed a copy of my email to you on Friday February 22, 2008 that presents my
fathers situation.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV align=justify>
<ADDRESS>I tried to give you some order of semblance to the files, and tried to
include what I thought you would find most interesting to your efforts and research
in the field of ET. Unfortunately, I do not possess any documents from any of the
hospitals or psychiatrists that have treated my father. I will eventually have to
attempt to interview the psychiatrists or recover some of the
documents.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV align=justify>
<ADDRESS>I have a case with the Citizens Commission for Human Rights (CCHR)
and am in the midst of filing a complaint for my own psychiatric abuses. I may at
some point involve that organization. I can tell you that during the 1960s my father
was subject to shock treatments, psychiatric emergency and evaluations, and a few
short hospital stays, nothing longer than 30 days. During most of this time, there
were significant business interests and assets that were extorted. You will find this
under the Sam Caterbone Dry Cleaners. This was typical protocol and the MO for
the perpetrators and their agenda.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV align=justify>
<ADDRESS>I hope this information is useful to you and Dr. Greer, and the
Disclosure Project. I would appreciate your feedback on my attempt to deliver this
information. I am trying to provide you with as much information as possible without
wasting your time. Please let me know how I did. I would also not in any way be
insulted if this information was not of your interest.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV align=justify>
<ADDRESS>Again, I thank you for your time and look forward to hearing from
you.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<ADDRESS>With Kindest Regards,</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Stan J. Caterbone</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Advanced Media Group</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Enclosure</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Advanced Media Group Page 1 of 3 February 26, 2008</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>CD-ROM Samuel Caterbone, Jr. Disclosure Project Report of
February 26, 2008 File List:</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>00 Letter to R Scott Smith Fulton Bank Dec 3 2007</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>01 Samuel P Caterbone UFO Research February 21 ZOOS</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>02 Samuel Caterbone Jr. Passport Renewal February 3
1964b</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>03 Samuel Caterbone Jr. Passport Renewal February 3 1964
bw</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>04 Samuel Caterbone ID Comparison jan 22 2008</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>05 Samuel Caterbone Jr Naval Air Gunners School Honors
1943</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>06 Samuel Caterbone Jr Naval Air Gunners School Certificate
1943</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>07 Naval Air Gunners Training Manual June 1 1943</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>08 Naval Air Technical Training Center Photo Abum</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>09 Samuel Caterbone Naval Air Gunners Honors 1943</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>10 Samuel Caterbone Jr Navy Photos</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>11 John Lehman On Seas of Glory Book & Autograph of Feb 7
2008</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>12 Sam Caterbone Cleaners Documents Feb 14 2008</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>13 Samuel Caterbone 1973 Tax Return Docs Jan 21 2O08</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>14 President Judge Farina & My Father Samuel
Caterbone</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>15 Samuel P. Caterbone (My Father) Criminal Charges</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>16 Samuel P. Caterbone 1942 LCHS Diploma</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>17 Tree Top Stables Uncle Jim Caterbone Winners Circle 1963-
1969</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>18 Samuel Caterbone Jr and Yolanda Roda Caterbone</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>19 Samuel Caterbone Jr Childhood Photos</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>19 Samuel Caterbone Family Photos</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>
<HR>
</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>February 22, 2008 </ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Email to Debbie Foch of the Disclosure Project:</ADDRESS>
<DIV align=justify>
<ADDRESS>I am just finishing a dossier on my father's writings, accounts, and his
life's accomplishments. My father was a very intelligent man. He graduated with
honors from radio school in the U.S. Navy. He once told me that he used to fly over
the Bermuda Triangle on training missions and on one occasion something
happened. He then went on to build a successful dry-cleaning business and
invented some techniques and filtration systems for the dry cleaning
business.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV align=justify>
<ADDRESS>My father was an avid world traveler and was very learned regarding
Middle East Affairs and visited there. During the Persian Gulf War we
would discuss the strategies of the Middle East on a daily basis, and my father was
very accurate in his conclusions. I have done the same with this current war in
Iraq.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV align=justify>
<ADDRESS>I think my father started doing research and somehow threatened the
U.S. Government. I believe they used the mind invasion to quell his curiosity. My
father was into the ET phenomenon with respect to communications. It was his
belief that they were communicating. His conclusion was always that we would
never be able to garner the evidence that we peruse. He was learned about the U.S.
Navy Blue Book and SETI.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV align=justify>
<ADDRESS>In the 90's he had a quite extensive mailing list of research, academic,
and scientific people that he would write on a monthly basis in an effort to try to
have someone help him understand his situation. </ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV align=justify>
<ADDRESS>In December of 2005, I became telepathic. I knew that since my
whistle blowing activities on International Signal and Control in 1987 I attracted the
Intelligence community. ABC News 20/20 and Nightline aired 4 programs on ISC and
Arms to Iraq rom ISC in Lancaster, PA. Defense Secretary Robert Gates had to
convince the Senate that he had no ties with ISC on both of his confirmation
hearings for Director of the CIA.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV align=justify>
<ADDRESS>I knew that I was being remote viewed over the years, however in May
of 2005 I filed my first civil complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern of
Pennsylvania, which included a Federal False Claims Act. I know that they began
using the mind control to disrupt my litigation and to harass
me.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV align=justify>
<ADDRESS>After I began researching, I began reviewing my father's information
and research and have came to the conclusion that he was the target of mind
invasion and they used the ET phenomenon as the subject
matter.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV align=justify>
<ADDRESS>The U.S. Government has a problem with me right now. In 1987 when I
began to whistle blow on ISC, I also began documenting everything. I immediately
microfiche 10,000 documents and recorded my phone conversations with
government officials to prove the truth and the cover-up. I also learned a great deal
having witness my father's experience and having him teach me the important
aspects of life and with Christian values. I was the closest person to my father, even
though through his ordeal, he lived a fairly reclusive life.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV align=justify>
<ADDRESS>Anyway, for what it is worth, I would like you and Disclosure to have
my report when it is completed. I will send it via a CD-ROM at your address, or I
would be able to drive it to your Maryland office. I had spent much time working in
Washington, D.C. and the area. I was a partner with NIST in voice recognition
systems, so I know the Maryland area as well.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV align=justify>
<ADDRESS>I appreciate your help, and hope to someday meet. I would love to, if at
all possible have the opportunity to meet Dr. Greer, if he would have the
time.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV align=justify>
<ADDRESS>Let me know what address would be best.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV align=justify>
<ADDRESS>Stan J. Caterbone</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<ADDRESS>Advanced Media Group</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<ADDRESS>Advanced</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<ADDRESS>
<HR>
</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<ADDRESS>February 22, 2008</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Email from Debbie Foch of the Disclosure
Project</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV align=justify>
<ADDRESS>Hi Stan,</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV align=justify>
<ADDRESS>We know that people who have real ET contact experiences (usually
these people are very sensitive telepathically or with remote viewing, etc)get the
attention of those in control, who then use psychotronics, etc to give the person
some sort of false ET contact experience. So, what you're telling us makes
sense.</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV align=justify>
<ADDRESS>If you want to send the documentation for us to keep safe and use if
needed (with your permission), that would be fine. The address is Disclosure Project,
PO Box 4556, Largo MD 20775.</ADDRESS>
<DIV align=justify>
<ADDRESS>Perhaps some day you could meet Dr. Greer - we shall see.
</ADDRESS></DIV>
<ADDRESS>Thanks so much,</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Debbie Foch</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS> </ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>
<HR>
</ADDRESS>
face=Verdana>Wednesday, February 25, 2009 9:08:57 AM </ADDRESS>
face=Verdana>Samuel Caterbone, Jr. (1924 - 2001)</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Victory
One Apartments</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>119th
and 5th Streets</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>New
York, New York </ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Stan J.
Caterbone</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>220
Stone Hill Road</ADDRESS>
face=Verdana>Conestoga, PA 17506</ADDRESS>
<DIV align=center>
face=Verdana>November 1, 1999</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=center>
face=Verdana> </ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=left>
face=Verdana>Stan,</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=left>
face=Verdana> </ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=justify>
face=Verdana> The two statement I mailed some time
ago titled "WHY NEW YORK" no doubt gave you cause to wonder that this is all
about. What could be driving this Father of Six Boys who over the years could
not be associated with being apart of this Family Structure. Being aware of all
the psychological malfuntions I am vulberable too, what can I say. So I write
Not to influence only to state in a simple way what I'm about. I have good
positive direction and am on solid ground in my reasoning to the the
way I am. For many years this situation has forced
me to live alone and stay alone so I could keep up with it's demands. So I am
fortunate being in New York where I can be the way I am in such an
environment as New York. All this said, "How ALONE AM I"?
</ADDRESS>
face=Verdana> You have heard it often! "IS ANY
BODY OUT THERE"! This is my answer for that is the company I keep.
Thru direct Audio Communication that sees everthing I see, hears everything I hear
and knows everything I know and the communication is according. <A class=RE
target=_blank>(Mental Telepathy and Remote Viewing - See Mind Control
Research)</A> </ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>For all
it's worth I will state there is no psychological malfuntion involved in the Audio
Communication. If this is the case, "HOW ALONE AM I"!
</ADDRESS>
face=Verdana> Getting any kind of recognition is
something I give up on. From 1991 to 1997 I had an active high profile list of
many names that I addressed monthly. But without any evidence Truth is
Irrelevelant. So be it! I am convinced I live a story that is beyond
everyone's comprehension. But I do have a good lease and sufficient income
for the lifestyle of one of my age in my stay here in New York. In ending a
brief summation:</ADDRESS>
face=Verdana> My starting date for this situation was
in 1957. They started this situation in 1943 while I was in the Navy. A
Research Situation with no intention of being identified in this World. If this
World knew what I knew it would be shocked.</ADDRESS>
face=Verdana>Dad</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>
<HR>
</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>
Wednesday, February 25, 2009 1:39:33 PM </ADDRESS>
<DIV align=center>
<ADDRESS> </ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Excerpts from</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>"THE CAUSE AND EFFECTS
</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>OF A TOTAL AND GODLY PREDETERMINED
SITUATION"</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>FIELD OF DREAMS 11</ADDRESS></DIV>
<DIV align=center>
<ADDRESS>THIS STORY FIRST STARTED IN 1957</ADDRESS></DIV>
<ADDRESS>Video came in 1973 and Audio in 1984 and before that it was sort of
psychic with felt impressions and today a Human Radio. The same following
information was given to the Doctor for searching the internet and continues to be
worth $1,000.00.</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>Sam Caterbone</ADDRESS>
<DIV align=center>
<ADDRESS>VIDEO</ADDRESS></DIV>
<ADDRESS>How can the eye project the same image on any surface and it be an
independent intelligent entity. This eye projection exists every
conscious moment with or without my awareness. I cannot accept the brain or mind
to be responsible.</ADDRESS>
<DIV align=center>
<ADDRESS>EYE PROJECTION IMAGE</ADDRESS></DIV>
<ADDRESS>Its own mobility of movement within the space of sight independent of
my eye control. Two femal facial images larger then a silver dollar on any wall who
simulate a computer origin model with each having their own personality. An eye
projection in vivid color that is lively and simulates being of a computer control
origin. For communication the eye projection uses a coded system of colors and
numbers.</ADDRESS>
<DIV align=center>
<ADDRESS>EYE PROJECTION COMMUNICATION</ADDRESS></DIV>
<ADDRESS>The total eye projection is constantly flashing with dots in color at a
speed only a computer mind can interpret. When directed to myself the dots appear
so I can interpret. The facial parts are used thru dots and facial
expressions. The clock positions sometimes with hands are used for numbers
and time. The two facial images are side by side and one is smaller and can
direct themselves to look up, down, to the side and facing each
other.</ADDRESS>
<DIV align=center>
<ADDRESS>AUDIO</ADDRESS></DIV>
<ADDRESS>Male and female people talking in a audio pipeline at 3 locations watch
location has itw own voice ID. They use my eyes, my ears and talk
about everything I know and wherever I go and do it all better than I. Audio
sees Video and Video hears Audio. Apartment 309, the mailing list, and the
environment other then 309 is their conversation with TV and local
paper.</ADDRESS>
<ADDRESS>
<HR>
</ADDRESS>
LETTER TO DR. PHIL
The Dr. Phil show (Currently on NBC

TV at 3:00pm EST Monday thru Friday) 5482 Wilshire Boulevard
#1902 Los Angeles, CA 90036
What is going on in your town that
has everyone divided? Is there a dispute or an ongoing debate?
Does everyone in the town have a different opinion of what the fate of a
certain child should be? Different opinion on what is right or wrong in human
nature? Does your town need a Dr. Phil intervention? Is there
something going on that is making headlines and is the talk of the town?
Does everyone have an opinion? Tell us what your town is struggling to make
a decision with! 
 **We cannot help with
sewage problems or whether a statue should be erected or not. Please keep
that in mind when responding.
***Dr. Phil cannot read all emails and
cannot respond to every email personally. Dr. Phil producers may call
to discuss your story to be on the show. Please only respond if you are willing
to appear on the show

<HR>


face=Verdana> &nbs
p; &nbs
p; &nbs
p; September 19,
2008
The Dr. Phil Show
(Currently on NBC TV at 3:00pm EST Monday thru
Friday) 5482 Wilshire Boulevard #1902 Los Angeles, CA
90036
Dear Dr. Phil:
Lancaster County desperately needs a Dr.
Phil Intervention - A.S.A.P.
Let me summarize the situation as best I
can in a quick letter. You may visit my website and blogs for
additional information or your producers may provide me with an email address
(secure) to forward substantiating documentation.
In 1987 I filed complaints (Federal
Whistleblower) of a large firm, International Signal & Control (ISC of Lancaster,
PA) of fraud. I was a shareholder and executives met with me
regarding involving myself and the financial firm that I have founded (Financial
Management Group, Ltd.,). I was libeled, slandered, falsely imprisoned (5
times with 30 false arrests where all charges were dismissed), falsely hospitalized (3
times never committed) (fraudulent suicide allegations and the like) all in an effort
to discredit me.
Four years later in 1991 the company and
many executives were indicted and plead guilty to selling arms to Iraq through
South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud. In essence I was covered
up. I have had one attempt on my life. In those years I went public
with my allegations to local, state, and federal officials, with some of the meetings
being recorded, which I still posses. In 1987 I also had over 9,000 pages of
documents microfilmed to preserve the truth.
The twist is that the operations were
covert and part of a rogue CIA program. Some of the same
architects of the Iran-Contra saga were also involved. This is all very well
documented through congressional hearings and news reports. Ted Kopple
and ABC News/Nightline did three (3) stories on ISC/Lancaster and the CIA and the
illegal sales of arms (mostly cluster bombs) to Iraq. ABC News 20/20 did the
first episode on the story in February of 1991 during the Persian Gulf War.
The Nightline stories ran up until the U.S. Senate confirmation hearings for Robert
Gates (Current U.S. Secretary of Defense) for the Director of the CIA (September
1991). Questions were asked during the hearings of his involvement in the
ISC-CIA operations and subsequent sales of arms to Iraq.
The cover-up continued, and all of my
attempts for the courts were, of course, subverted, until 2005. I
finally was able to file in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania as a pro se litigant. I entered on my own behalf and have been
litigating ever since.
Ok, now it is 2005 and I am in federal
courts and now everyone in Lancaster County again tries to subvert and obstruct
my litigation, however, there is a new twist - I am now telepathic (since
2006). 
Over the years I know that some of the
black budget programs (usually part of some intelligence agency which operations
were either classified or not sanctioned) were delving into my mind.
I have had meetings with at least two
government agencies, the NSA (National Security Agency) and the Defense
Intelligence Agency. One of my problems is that I have extensive
research materials, all declassified, on mind control programs, but of course the
source remains covert. Anyway, I can deal with this
issue.
For whatever reason that I am telepathic, I
am constantly communicating with another person of interest. I
have communicated with several persons in the past two (2) years.

I am literally driving this quaint little
corrupt town of Lancaster Pennsylvania CRAZY. The envy and
jealousy is beyond your wildest imagination, and it is causing a high degree of
stress that is just not normal for anyone, let alone a
community.
What is the most challenging to deal with
is all of the hostile and adversarial attitudes of Lancaster County, all because I was
right and they are wrong! 
People will do anything for money, and
there are many violations that will cost my defendants millions of
dollars, both for damages and for the violations to my intellectual
property as well as the extortion of my businesses and
assets.
They cannot handle my intelligence or my
history. This community needs an expert in conflict resolution before
more people get hurt.
We need your help.
 &nbs
p; 
Sincerely,
Stan J.
Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-
microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p>
COLOR: windowtext; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial">Advanced
Media Group
COLOR: windowtext; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; mso-bidi-font-family:
Arial"><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; COLOR: #313131; FONT-FAMILY:
'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-
language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-
bidi-font-size: 12.0pt"><A
href="http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com">www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com</A>
 &nbs
p; &nbs
p; &nbs
p; &nbs
p; &nbs
p; &nbs
p; &nbs
p; &nbs
p; &nbs
p;

 &
nbsp; &
nbsp; 
 
LETTER TO CHIEF SADLER




 September
10, 2008 
<?
xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
/><st1:place w:st="on"><st1:PlaceName w:st="on"></st1:PlaceName></st1:place> 
<st1:place w:st="on"><st1:PlaceName w:st="on">Lancaster</st1:PlaceName> <st1:PlaceType
w:st="on">City</st1:PlaceType></st1:place> Bureau of Police<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">and Sector
9<o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">and Chief Keith
Sadler<o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">39 <st1:Street w:st="on"><st1:address w:st="on">West
Chestnut Street</st1:address></st1:Street>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"><st1:Street
w:st="on"><st1:address w:st="on">Lancaster, PA
17602</st1:address></st1:Street><o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">Re:
Terroristic Threats and Verbal
Assault<o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> By
William Lefty Plank (PLANK) 
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> of
<st1:address w:st="on"><st1:Street w:st="on">1252 Fremont Street</st1:Street>,
<st1:City w:st="on">Lancaster</st1:City>, <st1:State
w:st="on">PA</st1:State>
<st1:PostalCode
w:st="on">17603</st1:PostalCode></st1:address>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"><st1:address w:st="on"><st1:PostalCode
w:st="on"> &n
bsp;</st1:PostalCode></st1:address>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"><st1:address w:st="on"><st1:PostalCode
w:st="on"></st1:PostalCode></st1:address><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE:
10pt; COLOR: #313131; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New
Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-
language: AR-SA; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'"> On
September 9, 2008 at approximately
6:40pm
FACTS:
<OL type=1>
<LI>Turned corner at Charles Road
and Fremont Street on bicycle toward 1250 Fremont Street.</LI>
<LI>Observed PLANK on Fremont
Street leaning in black car talking to driver. Car parked in front of
1251-1253 Fremont Street on opposite side of 1250 Fremont
Street.</LI>
<LI>As approached 1250 Fremont
Street PLANK started yelling and shouting at me calling me a Nigger and yelling
about the kids being there. Was visibly drunk and holding a baby
in his arm.</LI>
<LI>PLANK starting shouting about me
calling Youth in Child Services last week.</LI>
<LI>I ignored him and rode up my lawn and
parked bike in front of my front porch to unlock door.</LI>
<LI>PLANK went and stood in his doorway
and kept shouting and yelling at me saying I should beat you up for calling Youth
and Child Services for his friend, and kept calling me a nigger. </LI>
<LI>I went and unlocked my door
and put my backpack in my kitchen. As I walked out to put my
bicycle in house PLANK pushed my bicycle over and his daughter in the black car
stuck her cell phone out the window and took pictures or a video while he pushed
my bicycle over.</LI>
<LI>I continued to ignore him and picked
up my bicycle and carried into my house.</LI>
<LI>I never said a word to him, and locked
all of my doors.</LI>
<LI>He kept walking on the lawn between
the two houses and kept yelling and shouting at me.</LI>
<LI>On Saturday evening,
September 6, 2008 at approximately 7:30pm someone in 1250 Fremont Street cut
down my antenna wire that ran from my television to my antenna. I
reported the incident to the Lancaster City Police at the precinct at about 9:00 am
on Monday, September 8, 2008. The desk sergeant refused to take the
complaint and was nothing but a smart-ass. I asked him if he has a code of
conduct in his union contract.</LI>
<LI>September 12, 2008 William
Lefty Plank pulled two (2) pepper plants from my garden and verbally assaulted me
remarks of yelling at me to take my medicine and calling me nuts. He kept at
it in a fit of rage.</LI>
<LI>September 13, 2008 William
Lefty Plank and a female started again to verbally assault me and threatened
me with saying the "Boods and Crypts" were after me and he was not going to
defend me anymore. He reiterated the he would "kick my ass" and wanted to
me to fight him. Both began to call me nuts and the like for filing a complaint
with Youth in Childhood Services on another female that visits that
house. William Lefty Plank said her boyfrined was a member of the
"Crypts" of New York.</LI></OL>
CONCERNS:
<OL type=1>
<LI>Father (Richard Plank) convicted of murder in 1979
Case No. 622-1979 and 623-1979 with a gun.</LI>
<LI>PLANK convicted of vehicular homicide and
assault.</LI>
<LI>Daddyjustice.com alleged PLANK involved with a
murder involving Kauffman and body at 1252 Fremont Street.</LI>
<LI>In past saw him walk into house with other males
carrying chains and baseball bats and they said the had to take care of
business.</LI>
<LI>Lancaster City Bureau of Police involved with Abuse of
Process, Complacency, and possibly criminal conspiracy to have PLANK and other
residents hurt or murder me?</LI>
<LI>Lancaster City Police, Lancaster County Sheriffs
Department, Mayor Rick Gray, and other law enforcement have ignored all
complaints regarding 1252 Fremont Street for past 2 years.</LI></OL>
MOTIVES:
<OL type=1>
<LI>CATERBONE/ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP v. Lancaster City
Bureau of Police, et. al., Case No. 08-2982 Amended Complaint due on or before
September 25, 2008.</LI>
<LI>Continue ISC Cover-Up and current litigation before
Third Circuit Court (07-4474 and 07-4475) and U.S. District Courts (05-2288; 06-
4650; 08-2981; 08-2981; 08-2983) and litigation in Superior and Commonwealth
Courts.</LI></OL>
Sincerely,
Arial">Sincerely,<o:p></o:p>
Arial"><o:p> </o:p>
COLOR: windowtext; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial">Stan J.
Caterbone, Pro Se<o:p></o:p>
COLOR: windowtext; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial">Advanced
Media Group<o:p></o:p>
COLOR: windowtext; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial"><A
href="http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/">www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com</A><o:p></o:p
>
Arial">Enclosures<o:p></o:p>
COLOR: windowtext; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial">cc: Mayor
Rick Gray<o:p></o:p>
COLOR: windowtext; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial"> <st1:place
w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">U.S.</st1:country-region></st1:place>
District Judge Mary McLaughlin Case No. 08-2982<o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">Notary
Public:<o:p></o:p>

<HR>


COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"><A class=RE
href="http://daddyjustice.com/horror.htm" target=_blank>MURDER IN PARADISE re: William Lefty Plank
</A>(Click
Here) Drugs, DEA &
Possible Murder in <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:City
w:st="on">Lancaster</st1:City> <st1:State
w:st="on">PA</st1:State></st1:place> by Ben
Vonderheide<o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">Go to Website Link At: <A
href="http://daddyjustice.com/horror.htm">http://daddyjustice.com/horror.htm</A>

10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><o:p></o:p> 
A dead body found in <st1:place
w:st="on">Paradise</st1:place>? Youd be forgiven if you didnt see the 168 word
story in the Intelligencer Journal on April 2, 2007. While the death of Jeffrey Wallace
hasnt caught the attention of the local media, DaddyJustice.com has spent days
and weeks interviewing and investigating the possible murder and possible cover-up
by the United States Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). 
10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"><o:p></o:p> 
10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">According to Wallaces parents,
Pennsylvania State Police told them that Wallace took a walk to nowhere in the
middle of the night, fell in the creek, smashing his face on the ground/rocks in the
creek and then drowned. <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:PlaceName
w:st="on">Lancaster</st1:PlaceName> <st1:PlaceType
w:st="on">County</st1:PlaceType></st1:place> coroners office confirmed that
the cause of death is drowning. 
10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">But what really happened?
DaddyJustice.com has decided to publish what is known for sure, as well as the
conflicting witnesses who all tell a horrific story. We publish it in the publics interest
but also to let you be the judge of the government agencies created to protect and
serve us! Its also our hope that this story prompts law enforcement to pursue
justice for the victim. 
10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">The "rumor" is that Wallace was found
on his back, no shirt and in in a "prayer-like" position with his arms folded across his
chest. Additionally Wallace had marks on his face. Hardly a sign that he fell into a
shallow creek - one foot deep at the most - and drowned. According to one official
who was at the scene, "The hill is unimpressive" i.e it does not support the police
contention. 
10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">What is known about the victim? In
speaking to his mother I see that he was a good man who had recently taken a
downward turn. The 38-year-old Army veteran was married at one time and has twin
sons and two daughters who survive him. Times weren't always good, however.
There was a divorce and at one point he declared bankruptcy and moved to
<st1:place w:st="on"><st1:State w:st="on">Louisiana</st1:State></st1:place>.
He moved back to <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:PlaceName
w:st="on">County</st1:PlaceType></st1:place> in 2004. At the time of his death
Wallace was living at <st1:Street w:st="on"><st1:address w:st="on">853 Millwood
Road</st1:address></st1:Street>, in a four unit townhouse. 
10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">Little is known about him since he
came back to <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:PlaceName
w:st="on">County</st1:PlaceType></st1:place>. His aged parents still live in
Narvon. They don't talk much about what happened. Wallace worked for a furniture
manufacturer in the <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:City
w:st="on">Philadelphia</st1:City></st1:place> area. He reportedly had just
cashed a $600 check prior to his death. There is street talk that he may have been
buying cocaine for his personal use. 
10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">The incident came to Daddy Justice's
attention in October when sources began telling us a different story, that Wallace
was murdered and dumped in the stream. Then other information began surfacing
about a possible police cover-up because a suspect in the murder may be providing
information to the DEA in ongoing drug cases in <st1:place
w:st="on"><st1:PlaceName w:st="on">Lancaster</st1:PlaceName>
<st1:PlaceType w:st="on">County</st1:PlaceType></st1:place>. A number of
events related to the possible suspect have been uncovered that seem to fit. They
appear to be more than coincidental. 
10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">Here's what Daddy Justice's
investigation has learned so far: 
<UL style="MARGIN-TOP: 0in" type=disc>
<LI class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; COLOR: black; TEXT-ALIGN:
justify; tab-stops: list .5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1">
<DIV align=justify>The names of Kenneth Hoffman Jr. and William Plank are
mentioned by numerous sources. <o:p></o:p></DIV></LI>
<LI class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; COLOR: red; TEXT-ALIGN: justify;
tab-stops: list .5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1">
color=#000000>Wallace may have been killed following a visit at the home of
Plank, <st1:address w:st="on"><st1:Street w:st="on">1252 Freemont
St.</st1:Street>, <st1:City w:st="on">Lancaster</st1:City></st1:address> City
[writer notes we have received conflicting information as to the location of the
crime and are continuing to investigate to discern the truth from the misinformation
campaign]. According to street talk this is a known drug house. Allegedly Wallace
was there to get drugs or had a "dispute" over drugs he had bought. Sources claim
that he was beaten here and then taken and dumped in the stream.
<o:p></o:p></DIV></LI>
color=#000000>Wallace's car was found hidden from view behind a house on a
property that Hoffman had owned and had recently sold to a church group. It was
vacant at the time. <o:p></o:p></DIV></LI>
color=#000000>Plank has a history of violence according to court records. He had
been convicted and served five and a half years in state prison for beating a man
near death concurrently with vehicular homicide. A woman was killed on his
motorcycle and he lost his right arm thus his nickname lefty.
color=#000000>Until recently Plank had been in Lancaster County Prison but as of
today he no longer appears in the listing of
inmates.<o:p></o:p></DIV></LI>
color=#000000>Hoffman was arrested in January 2006 following a major drug raid
at his residence. More than $25,000 in cash and drugs were confiscated. Hoffman
could be facing a possible life sentence as a result. (See related stories.)
color=#000000>Hoffman has yet to come to trial for the 2006 arrest, often a sign
that enforcement agencies may be using him as a criminal informant in other drug
cases and arrests.<o:p></o:p></DIV></LI>
color=#000000>Randy Parke, another <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:PlaceName
w:st="on">County</st1:PlaceType></st1:place> man involved in the drug scene, is
a friend of Hoffman. He and Hoffman reportedly brought methamphetamine to
Parke's garage in June. When Parke left with the two kilos of meth he was pulled
over and arrested. Parke is currently in a Philadelphia Holding Cell and
could face significant time for this arrest because of a prior conviction. Hoffman was
not arrested. <o:p></o:p></DIV></LI>
<DIV align=justify>Wallace's parents have twice told Daddy Justice that the police informed
them their son died of accidental drowning. The state police told DJ "there must be
some misunderstanding" if they think that. Although his parents aren't aware of it,
Pennsylvania State Police say there is an ongoing investigation into Wallace's death
(this apparently only since DJ has begun beating the bushes).
<o:p></o:p></DIV></LI>
<DIV align=justify>In an
interview, Hoffman told Daddy Justice he had an alibi for the Wallace death. He said
he was "cleared" by the Pennsylvania State Police shortly after the body was found
when they did a 45-minute interview with him. Hoffman admitted freely that the
word on the street is that he is an informant for the DEA but absolutely denied any
involvement, offering to take a lie detector test to prove it.
<o:p></o:p></DIV></LI></UL>
10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">Then a couple days ago Hoffman
threatened to have Daddy Justice publisher Ben Vonderheide arrested. Hoffman
stated he will NOT support his position by coming forward. Vonderheide advised
Hoffman he will be publishing what he has learned in the Wallace case. Hoffman
was told he should respond if he wants. Hoffman is using the police again to protect
him from being exposed as a possible killer. <o:p></o:p>
10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">Now as we get deeper into this story,
Daddy Justice has been warned to back off by a number of people, implying there is
a shady network out there of deals between law enforcement agencies and
individuals who have been arrested that are far more significant to their drug cases
than a dead man. 
10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">A couple of sources who had been
talking are now no longer calling. They have gotten word from the DEA through
Parke's federal public defender. <o:p></o:p>
Stay tuned, DaddyJustice.com has spoken to Lancaster City Police
Homicide Detective Pennsylvania State Police and the DEA agent in charge - we will
keep you up to date as the story develops.<o:p></o:p>
<o:p></o:p>
<SPAN style="FONT-
SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times
New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-
language: AR-SA; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'"> Copyright 2006-
2007 by DaddyJustice.com. All Rights reserved
<SPAN style="FONT-
SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times
New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-
language: AR-SA; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'">
<HR>


ARREST RECORD OF WILLIM "LEFTY"
PLANK
OF 1252 FREMONT STREET
1 S 75 1301 A Dr Unregist Veh 09/24/1991
C2198910<o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">2 S 75 3733 A Fleeing Or Attempting To Elude
09/24/1991 C2198910<o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">3 S 75 3112 A Traffic Control Signals 09/24/1991
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">4 S 75 3323 B Duties At Stop Sign 09/24/1991
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">6 S 75 1543 A Driv While Oper Priv Susp Or Revoked
#444444"><o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">7 S 75 3361 Driving At Safe Speed 09/24/1991
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">9 S 75 1786 F Oper Veh W/O Req'd Financ Resp
#444444"><o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">11 Recklessly Endangering Another Person M2 18 2705
#444444"><o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">12 S 75 1372 1 Allow Illegal Use Of Plate/Card
#444444"><o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">1 / Dr Unregist Veh Quashed, Dismissed, Demurrer
Sustained 751301A Farina, Louis J. 11/20/1991<o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">2 / Fleeing Or Attempting To Elude Guilty Plea 753733A
Farina, Louis J. 11/20/1991 Probation Max of 3.00 Months<o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">3 / Traffic Control Signals Quashed, Dismissed, Demurrer
Sustained 753112A Farina, Louis J. 11/20/1991<o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">4 / Duties At Stop Sign Quashed, Dismissed, Demurrer
Sustained 753323B Farina, Louis J. 11/20/1991<o:p></o:p>
#444444"><o:p></o:p>
BACKGROUND: yellow; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">6 / Driv While Oper Priv Susp Or
Revoked Guilty Plea 751543AFarina, Louis J. 11/20/1991 Probation Max of 3.00
Months<o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">7 / Driving At Safe Speed Quashed, Dismissed, Demurrer
Sustained 753361 Farina, Louis J. 11/20/1991<o:p></o:p>
#444444"><o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">9 / Oper Veh W/O Req'd Financ Resp Guilty Plea 751786F
Farina, Louis J. 11/20/1991 Probation Max of 3.00 Months<o:p></o:p>
#444444"><o:p></o:p>
BACKGROUND: yellow; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">11 / Recklessly Endangering Another
Person Guilty Plea 182705 Farina, Louis J. 11/20/1991 Probation Max of 2.00 Years
11/04/1992<o:p></o:p>
BACKGROUND: yellow; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">12 / Allow Illegal Use Of Plate/Card
Quashed, Dismissed, Demurrer Sustained 7513721 Farina, Louis J.
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">1 18 2701 A Simple Assault 02/14/1993
E2153023<o:p></o:p>
BACKGROUND: yellow; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">2 18 3502 A Burglary
02/14/1993 E2153023<o:p></o:p>
BACKGROUND: yellow; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">3 18 2706 Terroristic Threats
02/14/1993 E21530234 F3 18 3503 A1I
Crim Tres-Enter Structure 02/14/1993 E2153023<o:p></o:p>
BACKGROUND: yellow; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 1 / Simple Assault Guilty Plea
182701A Georgelis, Michael A. 03/26/1993 Min of 4.00 Months 29.00 Days Max of
1.00 Years 11.00 Months Confinement 2 / Burglary Nolle Prossed 183502A
Georgelis, Michael A. 03/26/1993<o:p></o:p>
SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">3 / Terroristic Threats Nolle Prossed 182706
Georgelis, Michael A. 03/26/1993<o:p></o:p>
SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">4 / Crim Tres-Enter Structure Guilty Plea
183503A1I Georgelis, Michael A. 03/26/1993 Min of 4.00 Months 29.00
Days<o:p></o:p>
SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">Max of 1.00 Years 11.00 Months<o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 1 M 35 780-
113 A31 Poss Of Marijuana 09/23/1995 E0177306<o:p></o:p>
SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">2 S Migration Migration Viol Local Ordinance
09/23/1995 E0177306<o:p></o:p>
SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">3 M 35 780-113 A32 Use/Poss Of Drug
Paraph 09/23/1995 E0177306<o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 1 / Poss Of
Marijuana Guilty Plea 35780-113A31 Allison, Paul K. 12/11/1995 Confinement
Max of 1.00 Months 05/15/1996<o:p></o:p>
SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">2 / Viol Local Ordinance Guilty Plea
MigrationMigration Allison, Paul K. 12/11/1995<o:p></o:p>
SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">3 / Use/Poss Of Drug Paraph Nolle Prossed
35780-113A32 Allison, Paul K. 12/11/1995<o:p></o:p>
1
F2 75 3735 A Homicide By Veh While Dr Under The Infl 08/10/1997
F1848405<o:p></o:p>
BACKGROUND: yellow; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">2 M2 75 3731 A1* Driving Under
The Influence Of Alcohol 08/10/1997 F1848405<o:p></o:p>
BACKGROUND: yellow; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">3 M2 75 3731 A4* Dr W/Bl Alc
Lev .10% Or Greater 08/10/1997 F18484054 S 75 1501 A Driving W/O A
License 08/10/1997 F1848405<o:p></o:p>
BACKGROUND: yellow; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">5 S 75 3309 <st1:Street
w:st="on"><st1:address w:st="on">1 Disregard Traffic
Lane</st1:address></st1:Street> (Single) 08/10/1997 F18484056 S 75 3361 Driving At Safe Speed
08/10/1997 F18484057 S 75 1372 3 Display Plate Card
In Improp Veh 08/10/1997 F18484058 S 75
3301 A Fail To Keep Right 08/10/1997 F1848405<o:p></o:p>
SIZE: 10pt; BACKGROUND: yellow; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">9 S 75 1786 F Oper
Veh W/O Req'd Financ Resp 08/10/1997 F1848405<o:p></o:p>
BACKGROUND: yellow; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">10 F3 75 3732 Homicide By
Vehicle 08/10/1997 F184840511 S 75 3714 Careless
Driving 08/10/1997 F184840512 S 75 1543 A Driv
While Oper Priv Susp Or Revoked 08/10/1997 F184840513 S 75 1301 A Dr Unregist Veh 08/10/1997
F1848405<o:p></o:p>
COLOR: #444444; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 1 / Homi By
Veh While Dr Under The Infl Guilty Plea 753735A Allison, Paul K. 11/18/1997 Min
of 3.00 Years Max of 6.00 Years Confinement
05/08/19982 / Driving Under The Influence Of Alcohol Guilty Plea
753731A1* Allison, Paul K. 11/18/1997 Confinement<o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">3 / Dr W/Bl Alc Lev .10% Or Greater Dismissed - Other
753731A4* Allison, Paul K. 11/18/1997<o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">4 / Driving W/O A License Dismissed - Other 751501A
Allison, Paul K. 11/18/1997<o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">5 / <st1:Street w:st="on"><st1:address
w:st="on">Disregard Traffic Lane</st1:address></st1:Street> (Single) Dismissed -
Other 7533091 Allison, Paul K. 11/18/1997 6 / Driving At Safe Speed
Dismissed - Other 753361 Allison, Paul K. 11/18/1997
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">7 / Display Plate Card In Improp Veh Dismissed - Other
7513723 Allison, Paul K. 11/18/1997<o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">8 / Fail To Keep Right Dismissed - Other 753301A Allison,
Paul K. 11/18/1997<o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">9 / Oper Veh W/O Req'd Financ Resp Dismissed - Other
751786F Allison, Paul K. 11/18/1997<o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">10 / Homicide By Vehicle Guilty Plea 753732 Allison, Paul
K. 11/18/1997 Confinement<o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">11 / Careless Driving Dismissed - Other 753714 Allison,
#444444"><o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">12 / Driv While Oper Priv Susp Or Revoked Dismissed -
Other 751543A Allison, Paul K. 11/18/1997<o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">13 / Dr Unregist Veh Dismissed - Other 751301A Allison,
#444444"><o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">1 18 2701 A Simple Assault 05/18/1997
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">2 18 2701 A1 Simple Assault 05/18/1997
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">3 S 18 2709 A1 Harassment/Strike, Shove, Kick, Etc.
05/18/1997 E1518694<o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">Migrated Dispositional Event 09/26/1997 Final
Disposition<o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">1 / Simple Assault Guilty Plea 182701A Allison, Paul K.
09/26/1997 Min of 1.00 Months 15.00 Days Max of 3.00 Months Confinement2 / Simple Assault Guilty Plea 182701A1 Allison, Paul K.
09/26/1997 Min of 3.00 Years Max of 6.00 Years Confinement
05/08/1998<o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">3 / Harassment/Strike, Shove, Kick, Etc. Guilty Plea
182709A1 Allison, Paul K. 09/26/1997 Min of 1.00 Months 15.00 Days Max of 3.00
Months<o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">1 Terroristic Threats W/ Int To Terrorize Another M1 18
2706 A1 07/14/2005 K1332262<o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">2 S 18 3503 B1II Def Tres Posted 07/14/2005
K1332262<o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">3 M3 18 5503 A4* Disorder Conduct Hazardous/Physi Off
07/14/2005 K1332262<o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">1 / Terroristic Threats W/ Int To Terrorize Another Charge
Changed (<st1:Street w:st="on"><st1:address w:st="on">Lower
Court</st1:address></st1:Street>) 182706A1 Hartman, Cheryl N.
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">2 / Def Tres Posted Guilty Plea (<st1:Street
w:st="on"><st1:address w:st="on">Lower Court</st1:address></st1:Street>)
183503B1II Hartman, Cheryl N. 09/08/2005<o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">3 / Disorder Conduct Hazardous/Physi Off Guilty Plea
(<st1:Street w:st="on"><st1:address w:st="on">Lower
Court</st1:address></st1:Street>) 185503A4* Hartman, Cheryl N.
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">1 / Use/Poss Of Drug Paraph Guilty Plea (<st1:Street
35780-113A32 Hartman, Cheryl N. 10/28/2005 Guilty Probation/Parole Violation
Hearing 06/12/2006 Not Final<o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">1 / Use/Poss Of Drug Paraph Guilty Plea (<st1:Street
35780-113A32 Allison, Paul K. 06/12/2006<o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">M3 18 4914 A False Identification To Law Enf. Off.
04/01/2006 L2478125<o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">2 S 75 1543 A Driv While Oper Priv Susp Or Revoked
#444444"><o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">3 S 75 1301 A Dr Unregist Veh 04/01/2006
L2478125<o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">4 S 75 1371 A Veh Reg Suspended 04/01/2006
L2478125<o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">5 S 75 1372 3 Display Plate Card In Improp Veh
#444444"><o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">Lower Court Disposition 05/24/2006 Not Final1 / False Identification To Law Enf.
Off. Guilty Plea (<st1:Street w:st="on"><st1:address w:st="on">Lower
Court</st1:address></st1:Street>) 184914A Ballentine, Kelly S
Revoked Guilty Plea (<st1:Street w:st="on"><st1:address w:st="on">Lower
BACKGROUND: yellow; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">3 / Dr Unregist Veh Guilty Plea
06/09/2006
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> / Veh Reg
Suspended Withdrawn 751371A Ballentine, Kelly S 06/09/20065 / Display Plate Card In Improp Veh
Withdrawn 7513723 Ballentine, Kelly S 06/09/2006 Guilty Technical Probation/Parole Violation
Hearings 11/16/2006 Not Final 1 / False Identification To Law
Enf. Off. Guilty Plea (<st1:Street w:st="on"><st1:address w:st="on">Lower
Court</st1:address></st1:Street>) 184914A Reinaker, Dennis E. 11/16/2006
Reinaker, Dennis E. 08/02/2007<st1:address w:st="on">Lower
Reinaker, Dennis E. 08/02/20073 / Dr Unregist Veh Guilty Plea
Reinaker, Dennis E. 08/02/2007
<HR>
<o:p></o:p>

COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman';
mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-
SA; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE:
10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New
Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-
language: AR-SA; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; mso-fareast-font-
family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-
US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New
Roman'"> 
AMENDED COMPLAINT OF 2007
<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: center">IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA STAN J.
CATERBONE ADVANCED MEDIA GROP v. LANCASTER
COUNTY PRISON, et. al., Case No. 05-cv-2288 U.S. Third Circuit
Court of Appeals Case No. 07-4474 
<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: left"> </DIV>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">DEFENDANTS LANCASTER COUNTY
PRISON FULTON BANK LANCASTER COUNTY SHERIFF'S
DEPARTMENT AVALON POLICE DEPARTMENT STONE HARBOR POLICE
DEPARTMENT SOUTHERN REGIONAL POLICE DEPARTMENT (Conestoga,
PA) MANHIEM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT MELLON BANK (Formerly
Commonwealth National Bank) </DIV> 
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">AMENDMENT TO COMPLAINT AND MOTION FOR
CONTINUANCE </DIV></DIV> 
<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify"> AND NOW on this 15th, day of October, 2007, I,
Stanley J. Caterbone, PLAINTIFF, Pro Se Litigant, do hereby file before the Courts an
AMENDMENT to the above case. The PLAINTIFF requests the Court to grant an
additional 60 days to further amend this complaint and to amend and/or dismiss
case no. 06-4650 on or before December 15, 2007, at the time of the next
amendment to this complaint. The PLAINTIFF also seeks clarification from the Court
per the rules of original service; otherwise the PLAINTIFF will service all defendants,
both original and the additional defendants per the 120-day rule after the filing of
the next amendment to this complaint. The PLAINTIFF will also meet with the
Federal Bureau of Investigation on October 15, 2007 at the time of this filing to
report activities, which have prevented the PLAINTIFF from completing this
amended complaint per the order of July 25, 2007. Date: October 15, 2007
 Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant 1250 Fremont Street Lancaster, PA
17603 amgroup01@msn.com http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/
 </DIV>
<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify">
<HR style="WIDTH: 100%; HEIGHT: 2px">
</DIV>
<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify">ORIGINAL DEFENDANTS
LIST LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON LANCASTER
COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT COMMONWEALTH
NATIONAL BANK, MELLON BANK FULTON
BANK SOUTHERN REGIONAL POLICE
DEPARTMENT MANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE
size=2>AVALON POLICE
size=2>STONE HARBOR POLICE
size=2> AMENDED DEFENDANT'S
LIST AMERICAN HELIX TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION DAVID D.
DERING THE HIGH
GROUP PETER
PENEROS SCOTT ROBERTSON
(X) RIC FOX, ATTORNEY ROBERT CHERCICOFF, ATTORNEY PLANNERS
SECURITIES GROUP YOLANDA CATERBONE
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">STEVE CATERBONE (X) PHIL CATERBONE (X) MICHAEL
CATERBONE (X) COPELLO AND FOLEY LAW
FIRM LEW SCHWELLER, ATTORNEY DR. LEVINE, PSYCHIATRIST ANDREW APPEL,
ATTORNEY APPLE, YOST & SORENTINO
LAW FIRM LANCASTER AVIATION,
INC., CHUCK SMITH FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT GROUP, LTD., ROBERT F.
KAUFMAN MICHAEL
HARTLETT ROBERT R. LONG
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">JAMES WARNER BURDETTE
TOMLIN HOSPITAL CRAIG RUSSELL,
ATTORNEY RUSSELL, KRAFT, GRUBER, AND
HUBER, LAW FIRM LARRY SIGLER, MANHEIM TOWNSHIP
POLICE DEPARTMENT LARRY MATHIAS, MANHEIM
TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT NANCY ARMENT
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">STACY WALTERS (X) LANCASTER NEWSPAPERS, INC. SOUTHERN REGIONAL HOSPITAL, FORMER SAINT JOSEPH
HOSPITAL ROBERT BEYER, ATTORNEY
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">JOSEPH RODA, ATTORNEY MARY LYNN DIPAOLO (X) MAGISTERIAL
DISTRICT JUSTICE MURRAY HORTON MICHAEL
MCDONALD, ATTORNEY JOHN
DEPATTO LT.
MADENSPACHER, MANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT DR. AL SHULZ, PSYCHIATRIST REGIONAL
MEDICAL CENTER, ST JOSEPH HOSPITAL PFLUMM CONTRACTORS,
INC. DAVID PFLUMM (X) PAMELA SUE PFLUMM KERRY EGAN OFFICER ROBERT FEDOR, SOUTHERN REGIONAL
POLICE SGT. ROBERT BUSSER, SOUTHERN
REGIONAL POLICE LANCASTER GENERAL
HOSPITAL DR. EMILY
PRESSLEY Judge Mary
McLaughlin ORDER of July 25, 1987: AND NOW, this 25th day of July 2007, upon
consideration of the plaintiff's Motion for Continuance (Doc, No. 56) and defendant
Mannheim Township's opposition thereto (Doc. No. 57), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that
the said motion is GRANTED, the plaintiff shall have until October 15, 2007, to
amend his complaint: If the plaintiff does not do so, this case will be dismissed, with
prejudice, The Court will not grant the plaintiff any more time extensions for the
filing of his amended complaint. I) INTRODUCTION Not
Complete II) JURISDICTION: Not Complete 1. Count I - 18 U.S.C. 1961 through
18 U.S.C. 2. Count II - 1968, RICO; 31 USCS
 3. Count III - 3729-33 Federal False Claims Act;
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">4. Count IV - extortion, 5. Count V - defamation of character, 6. Count VI - slander, 7. Count VII -
wrongful interference with business relations, 8. Count
VIII - wrongful interference with contracts, 10. Count X - a
plea for an accounting; 11. Count XI -
deceptive and fraudulent practices 12. Count XII -
breach of fiduciary duty 13. Count XIII -
unfair competition 14. Count XIIII - tortuous
interference with business relationships 15. Count XV -
unjust enrichment 16. Count XVI - a pattern of
racketeering in violation of the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. 1961 et seq. 17. Count XVII -
illegal retaliation 18. Count XVIII - unlawful
discrimination 19. Count XVIIII - intentional
infliction of emotional distress 20. Count XX -
wrongful repossession 21. Count XXI
trespass to person 22. Count XXII civil
conspiracy 23. Count XXIII violation of due
process 24. Count XXIIII conspiracy to
commit fraud 25. Count XV loss of
liberty 26. Count XVI false
imprisonment 27. Count XVII false
arrest 28. Count XVIII collusion 29. Count XVIIII false statements 31. Count XXXI
conversion 32. Count XXXII
replevin 33. Count XXXIII - breach of contract
arising out of the alleged repossession 34. Count XXIV
assault 35. Count XXXV
battery 36. Count XXXVI - malicious
prosecution 37. Count XXXVII - malicious abuse
of process claims arising out of the charges and arrest 38. Count XXXVIII mail fraud III) HISTORY OF COMPLAINT Not Complete IV) AMENDED
COMPLAINT 1. Legal Arguments and issues of the Statute of Limitations and Time
Barred Causes of Actions that support that justice has been denied and due process
subverted thus granting relief to the PLAINTIFFS: a. (RICO), 18 U.S.C. 1961 et seq.; A claim may be barred by the
statute of limitations if you discovered or reasonably should have discovered your
injury four or more years ago. b. Civil RICO claims are not subject to a statute of limitations. Congress
failed to include a statute of limitations when it passed the RICO Act, but the United
States Supreme Court has remedied that oversight and imposed a four-year statute
of limitations on all civil RICO claims. c. Civil Rico's statute of limitations begins to run when the victim
discovers or reasonably should have discovered its injury. Once a victim is aware or
should be aware of its injury, the victim has four years to discover the remaining
elements of its claim and bring suit. A victim cannot sit on its rights and refrain from
filing suit in the face of known injuries. d. There are several equitable doctrines that may toll or suspend the
running of the statute of limitations. If a defendant fraudulently conceals facts that
are essential to the victim's ability to purse its rights, the running of the statute of
limitations may be tolled. e. Acts of duress, such as "if you sue me, I'll kill you," may toll the
running of the statute of limitations. f. All tolling doctrines are based upon whether it is fair, under the
circumstances, to bar the victim's claims on the basis of the running of the statute
of limitations. g. If a defendant engages in a new
pattern of racketing, that causes new and independent injuries, a new limitations
period may apply to those new and independent injuries. 2. The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (commonly
referred to as RICO), 18 U.S.C. 1961 et seq.;: RICO is a United States federal law
which provides for extended penalties for criminal acts performed as part of an
ongoing criminal organization. RICO was enacted by section 901(a) of the Organized
Crime Control Act of 1970, Pub. L. No. 91-452, 84 Stat. 922 (Oct. 15, 1970). RICO is
codified as Chapter 96 of Title 18 of the United States Code, 18 U.S.C. 1961
through 18 U.S.C. 1968. RICO addresses long-term, not one-shot, criminal activity.
Not only must a RICO claim be based upon criminal activity, but the criminal acts
must constitute a "pattern" of criminal activity. a. A single criminal act, short-term criminal conduct, or criminal actions
that bear no relationship to each other will not give rise to a RICO claim. The United
States Supreme Court has ruled that criminal actions constitute a "pattern" only if
they are related and continuous. b. In order to be "related," the criminal acts must involve the same
victims, have the same methods of commission, involve the same participants, or
be related in some other fashion. A pattern may be sufficiently continuous if the
criminal actions occurred over a substantial period of time or posed a threat of
indefinite duration. c. The former patterns are referred to as closed-ended patterns; the latter
patterns are referred to as open-ended patterns. d. Accordingly, even if you have been injured by a criminal act, you will
not have a RICO claim unless that criminal act is part of a larger pattern of criminal
activity. CAUSES
OF ACTIONS 3. Lancaster Aviation arrange for the
selected aircraft to be flown in from the Midwest to be inspected by PLAINTIFF. Pete
Wolfson of Lancaster Aviation conducts the meeting, as an official agent of
Lancaster Aviation. Commonwealth Bank has approved the financing of $97,000 for
the purchase. The additional $25,000 required is not yet available. Pete Wolfson
insists that the plane must be purchased before being flown back to the Midwest.
Pete Wolfson requests a post-dated check from PLAINTIFF for the remaining balance.
PLAINTIFF refuses, citing that the remaining funds must be liquidated from the
Keystone Mutual Fund, and the exact receipt of the moneys is not guaranteed, and
could take up to 10 days. Pete Wolfson agrees not to deposit the check until
PLAINTIFF confirms that the funds have been received and deposited in order to
cover the check for the remaining $25,000. PLAINTIFF makes sure that Pete Wolfson
has the authority to make the arrangement, and Pete Wolfson agrees. The purchase
of the airplane was also subject to a pre-purchase inspection by Lancaster Aviation.
Lancaster Aviation also advises PLAINTIFF to have his airplane included in their Fleet
Insurance plan. PLAINTIFF also advises Lancaster Aviation that he would like to offer
the airplane to his business associates for use in order to subsidize the costs and
maintenance. 4. Chuck Smith, president of
Lancaster Aviation, later discloses to PLAINTIFF that he had deposited PLAINTIFFs
pre dated check for $25.000, without the confirmation by PLAINTIFF that the funds
had been transferred from accounts. PLAINTIFF had argued with Pete Wolfson, the
salesman for Lancaster Aviation, that he did not want to give them a post dated
check, however Chuck Wolfson insisted. Now, Chuck Smith had told PLAINTIFF that
Pete Wolfson did not have the authority to complete the transaction. However
PLAINTIFF reminded Chuck Smith that he was acting as an agent for Lancaster
Aviation, and that was not material to this dispute. 5. Lancaster Aviation and Commonwealth Bank engaged in Count IV -
extortion, defamation of character, slander, wrongful interference with business
relations, wrongful interference with contracts, obstruction of justice, trespass to
person, unfair competition, fraud, conspiracy, embezzlement, breech of contract
and several violations in lender liability; in later repossessing the aircraft on July 1,
1987 with no advanced notice and no reason or cause. Commonwealth Bank was
the mortgagor on the property of Olde Hickory, which the PLAINTIFF had a loan
commitment of $5 million to refinance that property. Lancaster Aviation will deny
the PLAINTIFFs airplane to provide service to a scheduled charter by Jim Bly of
Source Management of Virginia on June 27, 1987. The PLAINTIFF had an agreement
for $300.00 per hour and an estimated 6-hour charter planned. 6. On June 23, 1987 Larry Resch, an executive of
both International Signal & Control, Plc,.(ISC) And United Chem Con visits
PLAINTIFF at Financial Management Group, Ltd., headquarters in Lancaster, as
scheduled to discuss business opportunities. Larry Resch explains "we had to fly
Carl Jacobson out of the country early this morning" as the reason for his not being
able to attend the meeting as planned. Larry Resch discusses possible strategies to
rescue Chem Cons Minority 8A Set-aside contracts, and solicits financing for new
facility. PLAINTIFF becomes annoyed the context of the conversation, especially the
lack Of disclosure, and discusses allegations of wrongdoing by Guerin and
International Signal & Control, Plc, and the relationship to United Chem Con.
After evaluating the financial statements, PLAINTIFF also suggests there is
approximately $15 to $18 million in missing funds. 7. Mr. Larry Resch failed to inform the PLAINTIFF of his association and
position with International Signal & Control, Plc., while the PLAINTIFF formally
began his whistle blowing activities on International Signal & Control, Plc..
</DIV>
8. On June
23, 1987, at 2:00 pm immediately following the meeting with International Signal
& Control Executive, Mr. Larry Resch, the PLAINTIFF has his locks changed to
his office by Russell Locksmith of Lititz, in order to secure confidential personal and
business files in light of the current internal power struggle between himself,
Michael Hartlett and Robert Kauffman, and given the conversation with Mr. Larry
Resch of International Signal & Control, Plc., a few hours earlier. 9. The Plaintiff was a personal guarantor of a 5 year
lease agreement with the Developer, Fishcer Spounagle, Ltd., for the offices of
Financial Management Group, Ltd., at 1755 Oregon Pike, Lancaster, Pennsylvania,
that began in 1986 and did renew until 1991. 10. Robert Kaufman, President of FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, Ltd.,
and other FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, Ltd., executives burglarize PLAINTIFF's
office removing confidential personal and business tiles. Some of the mortgage
banking and other business files have yet to be found. Kauffman and Robert Long
illegally issue FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, Ltd., stock certificates to Peter
Peneros and Scott Robertson. Robert Long signs the stock certificates as Secretary
of FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, Ltd., when PLAINTIFF was acting Secretary, and
was the only person duly authorized to issue FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, Ltd.,
stock certificates. PLAINTIFF learned of the burglary by Robert Kauffman, President,
in a telephone conversation while at Stone Harbor, NJ; Kauffman inadvertently
mentioned that the stock certificates were issued, however, with all documents at
risk of being stolen, PLAINTIFF did not mention the incident, in hopes to first recover
any potentially stolen business and personal files. 11. Financial Management Group, Ltd., executives engaged in obstruction
of justice, in unfair competition, wrongful interference with contracts, trespass to
person, criminal trespass, forgery, undo influence, conspiracy, embezzlement,
Count IV - extortion, mental duress, slander, defamation of character, wrongful
interference with business relations, and violated several bylaws of Financial
Management Group, Ltd., 12. On May 20, 1987, the PLAINTIFF and Attorney Ric Fox, of Harrisburg,
Pennsylvania, draft the legal Letter of Intent for investors of Power Productions I,
which the PLAINTIFF was general partner. The PLAINTIFF had several interested
parties some which have made verbal commitments, including Norris Boyd and
Dave Cook, an executive of Turkey Hill Minit Markets. 13. On June 29, 1987, the PLAINTIFF received patent research materials
from patent attorney Joel S. Goldhammer, of the prominent Philadelphia law firm
Siedel, Gonda, Goldhammer & Abbot regarding the "Digital" Movie, and the
national franchising of Financial Management Group, Ltd.,. PLAINTIFF had retained
the services of Siedel, Gonda, Goldhammer, and Abbot in order to investigate all
relevant matters concerning the technology, merchandising, and marketing of the
"Mutant Mania" project, and the use of the "Power Station" label. Research was
required for the merchandising of consumer electronics, professional audio/visual
digital mixing consoles, and the "Power Station Digital Movie System (PSDMS), as
created by PLAINTIFF in the proposal for SONY Corporation of Japan. 14. On May 11, 1987, the PLAINTIFF invested and
paid Scott Robertson, executive vice president of Financial Management Group, Ltd.,
$2,000 dollars from a personal account for an advance for work on mortgage
banking projects and the Digital Movie. On the same day the PLAINTIFF paid film
producer Marcia Silen, of Flatbush Films, Hollywood, California, an advance of
$750.00 for a cash advanced for work with the Digital Movie project. 15. The PLAINTIFF was executor producer of the
project, general partner of Power Productions I, the investment group, and named in
the Mutant Mania budget to receive a salary of $100,000. In addition the
PLAINTIFF had agreements to receive royalties on all revenues associated with both
the distribution of the film and video release and all branding of the merchandise
from the project. 16. Financial Management Group, Ltd., its officers and employees, along
with other Defendants including but not limited to Commonwealth National Bank
(Mellon Bank) (Mellon), Fulton Bank, the Manheim Township Police Department
engaged in unfair competition, wrongful interference with contracts, trespass to
person, criminal trespass, forgery, undo influence, conspiracy, embezzlement,
Count IV - extortion, mental duress, slander, defamation of character, obstruction of
justice, wrongful interference with business relations, and other anti trust violations
pertaining to the Digital Movie project. 17. The PLAINTIFF, on behalf of Financial Management Group, Ltd., began
research and discussions with corporate attorney, Jeff Jamanou of the law firm
McNesse, Wallace and Nurick regarding franchising the concept of Financial
Management Group, Ltd, on a national scale and considerations for a stock split.
The PLAINTIFF handled all legal endeavors of Financial Management Group,
Ltd., 18. Beginning in April of 1987,
Financial Management Group, Ltd, officers and executives engaged in a pattern of
unfair competition, wrongful interference with contracts, trespass to person,
obstruction of justice, criminal trespass, forgery, undo influence, conspiracy,
embezzlement, Count IV - extortion, mental duress, slander, defamation of
character, wrongful interference with business relations, and other anti trust
violations. 19. On June 18, 1987, the PLAINTIFF
and Randy Grespin, corporate attorney for The Life Underwriters Group, fly to
Atlanta, Georgia, to visit with executives of Planners Securities Group, a nationally
known Broker Dealer, and joint venture partner that was in the midst of a deal in
which Financial Management Group, Ltd., had negotiated an equity interest. The
PLAINTIFF had initially consulted with both Kauffman and Hartlett concerning the
trip, however when both disagreed, The PLAINTIFF questioned why the PLAINTIFF
was the only principal to personally visit the operations of Hibbard Brown &
Company, which lead the PLAINTIFF his decision to terminate the ill fated merger.
 20. Planners Securities Group, was regarded as the
most successful Broker Dealers in the financial planning community, and included
several former presidents of the national board of the International Association of
Financial Planners. The company had previously been recruiting Financial
Management Group, Ltd.,., and offering an attractive equity interest. Randy Grespin
agreed to reimburse $600 to The PLAINTIFF for the expense and use of his
aircraft. 21. The PLAINTIFF had the following
agenda for the trip and meeting:
a. Visit and
discuss the joint venture and merger with Financial Management Group, Ltd., and
evaluate the various departments necessary to administer Financial Management
Group, Ltd.,'s., stock transactions and private real estate
offerings.
b. Discuss
and evaluate the opportunities of utilizing insurance products from Randy Grespin's
firm, and all matters related to the structuring of business.
c.
Familiarize Greg Burie, a personal friend and recruitment of The PLAINTIFFs who
was also visiting from Florida to consider opening a Florida office for Financial
Management Group, Ltd..
d. Conduct
an extensive and thorough due diligence investigation of the stability, efficiency,
and security of the operations, in order to prevent a similar situation that facilitated
the previous termination of the recent Hibbard Brown & Company deal. The
PLAINTIFF left the meetings with very optimistic and impressive findings, that only
left more questions as to the decision of Kauffman and Bartlett to affiliate with
Hibbard Brown & Company, knowing that the Atlanta group had been
aggressively pursuing talks of a merger since the inception of Financial
Management Group, Ltd.,., On the return flight home, The PLAINTIFF confided to
Randy Grespin, requesting legal advise, regarding the recent problems and his
allegations of misconduct by Financial Management Group, Ltd.,., President Robert
Kauffman. Randy Grespin advised The PLAINTIFF to take some time and seek legal
counsel. 22. On June 18, 2007, after arriving
at the corporate offices of Upon entering the offices of Financial Management
Group, Ltd., Robert Kauffman pulls The PLAINTIFF into his office and abruptly shouts
"Who is running this corporation, me or you?". The PLAINTIFF quickly answers "I
don't give a damn who runs this company. as long as it's run right, and for the right
reasons!" The PLAINTIFF immediately left the office. 23. On June 18, 1987, later in the evening, Robert Kauffman, President
visits the home of the PLAINTIFF and engaged in a contractual dispute when the
PLAINTIFF refused to agree to approve the new contract and salary increase of
Robert Kauffman, President,. Robert Kauffman, President, engaged in retaliatory and
activities, including fraud, Count IV - extortion, libel, defamation of character,
obstruction of justice, and conspiracy. 24. June 22, 1987, The PLAINTIFF hires Todd Dellinqer, a planner in
Financial Management Group, Ltd.,., to help administrate the daily activities of his
personal clientele and to perform administrative duties necessary due to the
amount of time The PLAINTIFF is conducting business out at the office, allowing The
PLAINTIFF to focus attention on the Strategic Planning, and allowing him to better
manage his time. The PLAINTIFF sends a memo to client and shareholder Dr. William
Umiker that introduces his new assistant, in addition to information regarding his
pension accounts. 25. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, Ltd, Board of Directors meet to
vote on PLAINTIFF's request and demand to ratify the recent joint venture
agreement/contract with Hibbard Brown & Company, after PLAINTIFF learned of
dire inefficiencies within Hibbard Brown & company, and the "Born Again"
relationships of Kauffman, that placed an unprecedented amount of risk to
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, Ltd.,. PLAINTIFF voted by telephone from the
Chicago Airport, in the midst of his travel to Palm Springs and Hollywood California.
The Board also voted to negotiate and approve a deal with the Planners Securities
Group, of Atlanta, GA. PLAINTIFF had won the votes of Alan Loss and Robert Long,
overturning the decision of Robert Kauffman, President, and Michael Bartlett and
officially terminating the agreement. This vote, in and above itself, took control of
the Board of Directors from Kauffman and Bartlett, and put the power of the Board
in the direction of PLAINTIFF. This will eventually lead to the Coup conspired by
Kauffman and Hartlett to find a way to get PLAINTIFF out of the
corporation. 26. On January 20, 1987, the
PLAINTIFF and Al Dannatt, a principal and managing partner with the commercial
mortgage banking company Institutional Investors of Houston, Texas, consummate
a joint venture agreement where the PLAINTIFF will market and solicit clients on the
eastern part of the regional for commercial mortgages with a lending authority of $3
to $100 million dollars. The agreement also calls for the PLAINTIFF to develop other
joint venture proposals and business transactions with a bank the Institutional
Investors was in the process of purchasing. The PLAINTIFF in turn would began to
offer the joint venture to members of Financial Management Group, Ltd., to offer
finder fees to both Financial Management Group, Ltd., and any members of Financial
Management Group, Ltd., which referred clients and projects. 27. The PLAINTIFF alleges that the following revenue
sources:
a. Financial
Planning Fees and Commissions b. Financial
Management Group, Ltd., Management Salary c.
Mortgage Banking Business d. Real Estate
Limited Partnerships (Dave Schaad, Jim Bly, Dave Cook) e. Pension Fund Portfolio Management (Harsco, Inc., of
Harrisburg) f. Life Insurance Joint Venture
Agreements g. Personal Real Estate
Investments h. Air Charter
Services i. Reorganize Gamillion Film
Studios j. Equity Interests in Financial
Management Group, Ltd., have the following violations Count IV - extortion, defamation of
character, slander, wrongful interference with business relations, wrongful
interference with contracts, trespass to person, unfair competition, fraud,
conspiracy, embezzlement, breech of contract. 28. On June 25, 1987, Financial Group Executives burglarized the
PLAINTIFFs office and began to extort the PLAINTIFF business interests in the
Institutional Investors joint partnership. Up to that point in time, the PLAINTIFF had
developed a pipeline in excess of $100 million in projects, a firm commitment for a
satellite office in Hollywood, California, and a commitment for a $5 million second
mortgage on the Olde Hickory Properties, of Lancaster, County. The PLAINTIFF was
able to offer more attractive financing arrangements than that of the local
commercial lending institutions, including Fulton Bank and Commonwealth Bank.
Both banks would eventually engage in anti-trust violations. 29. On June 29, 1987, The PLAINTIFF visits with Dave Schaad, President
of the York based real estate firm of Bennett Williams, Inc., The PLAINTIFF was
finalizing plans to secure financing of a $2.5 million office complex for the new
headquarters of Bennett Williams, as well as 3 or 4 additional anchor tenants. The
PLAINTIFF had been working with Dave Schaad for the past 3 months, along with
Scott Robertson. The PLAINTIFF had previously discussed the deal with Dave Cook,
and executive and former owner of the Turkey Hill Convenience Stores. Dave Cook
indicated a serious interest in providing the entire $2.5 million investment. The
above deal would have provided over $150,000 of fees upon settlement to The
PLAINTIFF upon settlement. Prior to the meeting, Dave Schaad had indicated by
telephone, that Robert Kauffman had invited himself to the meeting, without prior
consent or notice to The PLAINTIFF, During the meeting, The PLAINTIFF disclosed
the current criminal activities within the principals of Financial Management Group,
Ltd., being facilitated by Robert Kauffman himself. 30. In June of 1987, Jill Carson, a Fulton Bank Branch Manager libeled and
slandered the PLAINTIFF in notifying Mr. Chuck Smith, owner operator of Lancaster
Aviation, the Plaintiff was bankrupt and had no liquid funds, which was totally
fabricated. At the time of this infringement and at least until August 8, 1987, the
PLAINTIFFs credit rating as reported by the Lancaster Credit Bureau was perfect,
with all creditors paid in full within 30 days, as agreed. The credit report included
22 creditors. Being that the PLAINTIFF was a customer, borrower, and a client in
good standing with Fulton Bank, this amounts to defamation of character, slander,
wrongful interference with business relations, wrongful interference with contracts,
trespass to person, unfair competition, fraud, conspiracy, embezzlement, breech of
contract. 31. On July 1, 1987, the PLAINTIFF
retained the counsel of Mr. Joseph F. Roda, Esq., of Lancaster, to arrange for a
meeting to discuss the recent events and Coup attempt by Kauffman and Hartlett
that included several criminal and security violations. The PLAINTIFF visits with Mr.
Joseph F. Roda, Esq. and describes the incidents in detail, including the "Digital
Movie", ISC, and all related activities. Mr. Joseph F. Roda, Esq. instructs The
PLAINTIFF to have all of the files copied and arranges for the return of all Financial
Management Group, Ltd., corporate files. The PLAINTIFF had questioned Mr. Joseph
F. Roda, Esq. for a legal opinion as to his right of any moneys in Financial
Management Group, Ltd., checking accounts that he was authorized to sign for. Mr.
Joseph F. Roda, Esq. advised that The PLAINTIFF had no right to any funds. All
checks were returned to Financial Management Group, Ltd., along with all other
documents. 32. The PLAINTIFF advises Mr.
Joseph F. Roda, Esq. that he is in fear that someone is deliberately orchestrating all
of the recent incidents, which were quite extraordinary and extremely criminal and
have been coming from all directions. The PLAINTIFF advised Mr. Joseph F. Roda,
Esq. that he would like to take all of his files to Stone Harbor, New Jersey for
safekeeping while he pursued his legal recourse. The PLAINTIFF also explained that
he would feel safer leaving Lancaster until these circumstances were brought under
control. 33. Mr. Joseph F. Roda, Esq., failed to
provide any advocacy representation; colluded with Financial Management Group,
Ltd.,; failed to inform the PLAINTIFF of any conflicts of interests with current clients
(Mr. William Clark, in house legal counsel for International Signal & Control,
Plc.,); was negligent in not reviewing the hundreds of documents the PLAINTIFF
delivered and for not identifying causes of actions, which United States District
Judge Mary McLaughlin identified from similar documents in June of 2006; was
negligent in not believing the PLAINTIFF detailed account of the Commonwealth
National Bank (Mellon Bank) wrongful repossession, may have conspired to cover-up
the PLAINTIFFs Federal False Claims Act against International Signal & Control,
Plc,. 34. Mr. Joseph F. Roda committed
fraud in invoicing the PLAINTIFF for services rendered, without any actual benefit
afforded to the PLAINTIFF. 35. The
Defendants conspired to discredit the PLAINTIFF with a massive campaign of libel,
slander and deceit when immediately following the meeting with International
Signal & Control, Plc., meeting of June 23, 1987 the following contracts were
terminated without cause:
a. Planners
Securities Group, Ltd., NASD Series 22 Securities License b. Planners Securities Registered Representative
Agreements c. William O. Umiker Executor of
Estate d. Michael T. Caterbone Power of
Attorney 36. On July 3, 1987, at
approximately 12:00 am, Victor Miasnikowcs, owner operator of Romar Aviation
(Currently Venture Jets, Inc.) calls The PLAINTIFF to notify him that his aircraft was
reposed some hour earlier, and locked in the hanger of Lancaster Aviation, with all
of his personal and business files on board. Victor only would say that
Commonwealth Bank had taken part in the repossession, with no reasons given. The
first payment of the loan agreement with Commonwealth National Bank (Mellon
Bank) was not due until July 25, 1987 and the $25,000 cash deposit for the airplane
was now officially extorted from the PLAINTIFF. There was no money due to
Commonwealth National Bank (Mellon Bank). The PLAINTIFF also becomes quite
suspicious, after learning a few weeks earlier that his efforts to provide a refinance
of some $6 million to Boyd Wilson Properties, was more favorable than the existing
or proposed financing arrangements now place with Commonwealth National Bank
(Mellon Bank), which not only has a lender relationship with The PLAINTIFF, but is
also a competitor for his mortgage banking activities. It was also known that The
PLAINTIFF's lending authority was larger and more competitive than most of the
local banking community. The PLAINTIFF now becomes in fear for his life due to this
incident, and all other unexplained incidents in the preceding days and weeks.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">37. Commonwealth Bank engaged in an illegal
repossession, conversion, replevin, trespass, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and/or
breach of contract arising out of the alleged repossession, Count IV - extortion,
lender liability, interference with business contracts and relations, civil conspiracy,
fraud, and violated anti-trust and lender liability laws. 38. On July 4, 1987 at approximately 9:00 am in the morning, The
PLAINTIFF calls his attorney Mr. Joseph F. Roda, Esq., under emotional duress from
the previous conversation with Victor and the repossession of his aircraft with all
documents on board; Mr. Joseph F. Roda, Esq. responds "Stan, you have to quit
fabricating these allegations, it is July 4th, what do you want me to do. This
conversation reaffirms a conspiracy theory within Lancaster to ruin him, and
supports his efforts to leave Lancaster with his files to solicit aid and support from
legal and law enforcement authorities to suppress the conspiracy. The PLAINTIFF
realizes that the documents were authentic proof and evidence of all of his
allegations, and most importantly all of his business activities for the past 5 or more
years. The loss of the files would have devastating consequences for his life.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 39. Mr. Joseph F. Roda committed fraud in
invoicing the PLAINTIFF for services rendered, without any actual benefit afforded to
the PLAINTIFF. 40. On July 4, 1987, at
approximately 9:30 am, after the disturbing phone, The PLAINTIFF drives to the
Cape May County Airport to solicit the services of a pilot to fly to Lancaster to
retrieve his files. Brad Donahue accepts the job, and agrees to a $200 tee, and an
additional $200 it there are any difficulties in obtaining the files. The PLAINTIFF
provides Brad Donahue with all documentation showing legal title to the aircraft in
the event authorities are notified. The PLAINTIFF gives explicit instructions to notify
the police in the event personnel will not return all of the files. Brad Donahue arrives
a few hours later, with boxes of files. Brad Donahue briefly describes an encounter
at Lancaster Aviation, and demands payment of $400 as agreed. An invoice is
signed by all parties as proof of payment and the activity, and $400 in cash is paid
to Brad Donahue. Pilot Dave Austin, of the Cape May County Airport witnesses the
transactions and the event. 41. In the
following weeks, Dave Austin, would later disclose to The PLAINTIFF that Brad
Donahue was killed in a mysterious "Air-Accident", while over water, with an
unexplained and questionable flight chart. 42.
The PLAINTIFF solicits the legal services of Ric Fox, a Harrisburg attorney that has
prepared legal documents for the "Digital" Movie. Rio Fox flies his aircraft to the
Cape May County Airport, and arrives at The PLAINTIFF's house accompanied with
another attorney Robert Chercicoff. All of the recent activities were detailed and
described concerning Financial Management Group, Ltd.,; the "Digital Movie"; and
the illegal repossession of the aircraft. The PLAINTIFF questioned Mr. Fox and his
associate of any relationship with Commonwealth Bank, which headquarters were
also in Harrisburg, and both gave a very ambiguous answer. The meeting ended
with both attorneys failing to recognize or admit to any wrongdoing by any and all
related parties, and further demanding a $2,000 retainer fee to look further into the
matters. The PLAINTIFF suspects the conspiracy theory again, especially in light of
the acknowledged relationship with Commonwealth Bank, and an indirect
relationship with Robert Kauffman, through Life Underwriters of Harrisburg, a joint
venture arranged by The PLAINTIFF some months earlier. By July 5, The PLAINTIFF
had already made two legitimate attempts to solicit legal aid for the unexplained
events and circumstances, both of which were maliciously
sabotaged. 43. Ric Fox and Robert
Chercicoff engaged in conspiracy, collusion, interference with business contracts,
interference with business relations, and had attempted to thwart and cover-up the
PLAINTIFFS Federal False Claims Act complaint.<BR style="FONT-
On July 6, 1987, In an effort to document the conspiracy theory, PLAINTIFF requests
Tom Caterbone to call Robert Kauffman, President, to inquire about the status of his
affairs, and to tape the conversation. Tom Caterbone identifies himself as John
Green, a client of PLAINTIFF's and Robert Kauffman, President, states the following:
"PLAINTIFF has moved his office to Stone Harbor, NJ.. he is not taking care of
business, and I need to see to it that his clients are taken care of for the time being..
he has been spending a lot of money, an airplane, a place at the shore, and he
seems to think that he is too important for his traditional clientele.. There is some
history of mental disorders in his family history.. I can't come right out and say that
that is what's going on,.... I wish Stan would get some professional help.. However
for the time being, Stan is not taking care of business, and I need to be concerned
for his clients. 45. On July 6, 1987, PLAINTIFF
telephones Dr. Al Schulz, psychiatrist at St. Joseph Hospital, and client of
PLAINTIFF's in order to thwart the allegations of insanity. Dr. Al Shulz had disclosed
that several persons, including Mary Lynn Dipaolo and Jere Sullivan had called him
concerning PLAINTIFF's behavior and activities.<BR style="FONT-
From the allegations, Dr. Shulz advised that PLAINTIFF was suffering from illusions of
grandeur, and prescribed Lithium treatment, and to return to Lancaster for
consultation. PLAINTIFF insisted that the allegations were purely fabricated, and that
no one had any legal right to interfere with his business and or legal affairs, let
alone his confidential medical records. 47. On July
6, 1987, PLAINTIFF contacts David Drubner, of Boston, Ma, a friend of PLAINTIFF's
brothers Mike, and an attorney. During the conversation, David Drubner questions
PLAINTIFF about "taking some medication", and supports the allegations of insanity.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 48. On July 17, 1987 PLAINTIFF travels to
Hollywood, California to meet and visit with Ted Gamillion and Gamillion Studios
(Film Studio), and Marcia Silen of Flatbush Films. Ted Gamillion had previously
solicited the consulting of PLAINTIFF in order to help reorganize the financing of the
film studio, after earlier arrangements in North Carolina had gone sour. PLAINTIFF
had spent several days visiting and touring the studio. Ted Gamillion agreed to allow
PLAINTIFF to represent the studio in order to secure the required financing. Ted
Gamillion provided PLAINTIFF with substantial amounts of confidential financial,
legal, and tax documents for the project. <BR style="FONT-
During the visit, Marcia Silen had disclosed to PLAINTIFF that Scott Robertson had
made allegations of insanity about him (PLAINTIFF) to persons at Power Station
Studios and and Flatbush Films. 50. In the
following days, PLAINTIFF had made numerous telephone calls to local, state, and
federal authorities, for intervention and help regarding all of the preceding events
and circumstances. The following is a brief description of each: Manheim Township
Police Department, responded "what bank branch repossessed your aircraft";
Pennsylvania State Senator Gib Armstrong, responded, "I will call the Pa Attorney
General's Office and have them call you; the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI),
the Philadelphia-based field office; U.S. Representative Robert Walker (R-Pa), a
detailed and explicit conversation with Mrs. Robert Walker, who would only advise
PLAINTIFF to put his situation in writing and submit it to the Congressman in his
Washington, D. C. office. In addition: David Wouls (Executive Vice President of the
Lancaster chamber of Commerce & Industry), PLAINTIFF talked at length, and
in detail, making allegations of misconduct with members of the same; National
Association of securities Dealers (NASD), in Washington, D.C., PLAINTIFF discussed
the securities related violations. And also: the Securities & Exchange
Commission (SEC), also in Washington, D.C., and discussed securities laws
violations; the Pennsylvania Securities Commission, of Harrisburg, Pa, discussed the
implications of PLAINTIFF's illegal lock-out, and his legal and formal positions,
including incorporating officer of Financial Management Group, Ltd., PLAINTIFF
received no support or follow-up communications concerning all of the above
requests, despite his apparent emotional duress, and extreme situation.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 51. On July 2, 1987, The PLAINTIFF negotiates
with Romar Aviation to provide pilot; storage; and insurance with his aircraft after
many very questionable occurrences at Lancaster Aviation, just a few hundred feet
away. The PLAINTIFF secures insurance and pays $1,000 to Romar Aviation for the
flight to Stone Harbor and insurance, which was conducted by Victor M. of Romar
Aviation. In addition, at the referral of Victor, The PLAINTIFF calls Sam Goode, of
Sam Goode Assoc., to bind insurance for the aircraft. Sam Goode Binds the
insurance and instruct The PLAINTIFF to mail a payment of $750. The conversation
took place in Romar Aviation, at the time the $1,000 was paid to Victor. The
PLAINTIFF loads his aircraft with all of his personal and business files to be
transported to the Cape May County Airport, just a few miles outside of Stone
Harbor, in the morning of July 4. 52. In July
and August of 1987 Mr. Robert Kauffman, President, had several meetings with
Millard Johnson, client of PLAINTIFF since 1982, in efforts to coerce Millard Johnson
to provide false statements to a bonding company that a legitimate loan from
Millard Johnson to the PLAINTIFF was instead an act of embezzlement of $25,000 of
funds that were transferred to the PLAINTIFF for an investment. Mr. Millard Johnson
testified in person on September 29, 1987 before Mr. Howard Eisler of the
Pennsylvania Securities Commission in a recorded interview and attested to the
preceding. Mr. Millard Johnson refused and notified Mr. Robert Kauffman that his
attempt was a serious crime. 53. Mr.
Kauffman and Mr. Michael Hartlett, a principal and partner of Financial Management
Group, Ltd., contracted with an insurance company on June 29, 1987 an errors and
omissions insurance policy for corporate officers of Financial Management Group,
Ltd., in an effort to collude, conspire, and defraud that insurance company of a
claim, while at the same time committing slander, libel, and conspiracy to extort the
PLAINTIFFs stock holdings, and all other business interests. 54. On July 24, 1987, Michael M. Hartlett sends a letter to all
creditors of Financial Management Group, Ltd., informing them that stated the
following: The PLAINTIFF is no longer an officer of the corporation; he was removed
from office on July 1, 1987; he had been purchasing items under Financial
Management Group, Ltd., and obtaining corporate discount and rates; and formally
notifying them that The PLAINTIFF had never had the right to purchase items
through Financial Management Group, Ltd., or make corporate commitments on
behalf of Financial Management Group, Ltd., or contract or in any way obligate
Financial Management Group, Ltd.,. 55. Mr.
Michael M. Hartlett engaged in slander, libel, defamation of character, conspiracy to
commit fraud, conspiracy to commit Count IV - extortion, interference with business
relations, and interference with business contracts. 56. On July 7th, 1987, the PLAINTIFF contacts the law firm of
Capello & Foley, of Santa Barbara, California. The PLAINTIFF had conducted
research (American Bar Association Journal) in "Lender Liability", which had became
a very popular legal issue, where banks participate in illegal activities resulting in
the financial ruin of it's borrowers. The PLAINTIFF intended to file suit against
Commonwealth National Bank (Mellon Bank) for the illegal and unjustified
repossession of his aircraft. The PLAINTIFF discussed the case briefly with Diane
Campell that day, and The PLAINTIFF made arrangements to deliver supporting
documents to the office in Santa Barbara the following week, while visiting with
Gamillion Studios, in Hollywood. <BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
8, 1987, A formal notification of the termination of The PLAINTIFF's Registered
Representative Securities license with the Planners Securities Group Inc., of Atlanta,
GA is received, with a "cc: Robert Kauffman".<BR style="FONT-
Planners Securities Group, Inc., engaged in conspiracy to commit Count IV -
extortion, conspiracy, fraud, libel, defamation of character, slander, Count IV -
extortion, interference with business relations, interference with business contracts,
and had violated several anti-trust violations.<BR style="FONT-
No explanation was provided, or any reasons for the termination. The PLAINTIFFs
reprisal for disclosing criminal activities to the proper authorities is that he will
illegally loose his privilege to sell securities without any
merit. 60. On July 8, 1987, The PLAINTIFF's brothers,
Steve, Phil, Mike, and Tom, arrive unexpectedly and uninvited at the residence of
The PLAINTIFF's in Stone Harbor, NJ, and refuse to leave until The PLAINTIFF agrees
to take Lithium and return to Lancaster to undergo treatment by Dr. Al Schulz, for
mental illness. 61. Steve Caterbone, Phil
Caterbone, Mike Caterbone, and Tom Caterbone had engaged in conspiracy, libel,
slander, defamation of character, conspiracy to commit Count IV - extortion,
interference with business relations, interference with business contracts, invasion
of privacy, and civil trespass. <BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
9th, 1987, The PLAINTIFF receives a notice by regular 1st class mail from
Commonwealth National Bank (Mellon Bank) regarding the repossession of 9 days
prior. The following reasons are given for the repossession: Failure to provide
adequate insurance; Removal of aircraft from Lancaster Aviation; Intended plan to
fly aircraft to Florida without prior written notice. 63. Commonwealth National Bank (Mellon Bank) engaged in
violations of lender liability by not providing advanced notice of the repossession
with any opportunity for the PLAINTIFF to cure any legitimate deficiencies in the
lending agreements. 64. On July 10, 1987, the
PLAINTIFF receives a formal notarized notification from Dr. and Mrs. William Umiker
of Financial Management Group, Ltd., removing The PLAINTIFF as the former Trustee
for their Estates. 65. On July 10, 1987, Mr.
Robert Kauffman also sends a personal letter to all of The PLAINTIFFs clients
informing each and every one that he has moved to Stone Harbor, NJ; that he may
not handle investments at all; and that people close to The PLAINTIFF had requested
that he, Robert Kauffman, personally service his clientele. 66. Robert Kauffman engaged in Count IV - extortion, fraud, libel,
slander, defamation of character, conspiracy to commit Count IV - extortion,
interference with business relations, interference with business contracts, invasion
of privacy, and civil trespass, and violated several anti-trust statutes.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 67. On July 15, 1987 the PLAINTIFF travels to
Boston, Massachusetts to research lender liability and other legal matters in a law
library of Suffolk Community College.<BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
16, 1987, the PLAINTIFF travels to New York, from Boston, MA, to visit with Bob
Walters of Power Station Studios, to discuss the allegations of Blackmail, and to find
out who is involved, including Scott Robertson and Power Station Studios.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 69. On July 17, 1987, the PLAINTIFF travels to
solicited the consulting of The PLAINTIFF in order to help reorganize the financing of
the film studio, after earlier arrangements in North Carolina had gone sour. The
PLAINTIFF had spent several days visiting and touring the studio. Ted Gamillion
agreed to allow The PLAINTIFF to represent the studio in order to secure the
required financing. Ted Gamillion provided The PLAINTIFF with substantial amounts
of confidential financial, legal, and tax documents for the project. During the
visit, Marcia Silen had disclosed to The PLAINTIFF that Scott Robertson had made
allegations of insanity about him (The PLAINTIFF) to persons at Power Station
Studios and at Flatbush Films. 70. The
PLAINTIFF discusses the illegal repossession and other related matters, however
during the conversation, becomes suspicious when Bob Walters and Tony Bongiovi
disclose that the "Digital" Movie project is suddenly suspended until a later
time. 71. On July 21, 1987, At 2:30 pm The
PLAINTIFF visits the law firm of Capello & Foley, in Santa Barbara, California,
and delivers 3 large blue binders for Diane Cambell and attorney Barry Capello to
review, concerning his allegations of dire violations of lender liability with specific
regards to the illegal repossession of his aircraft by Commonwealth National Bank
(Mellon Bank). The PLAINTIFF research the law firm of Capello & Foley at the
Suffolk law library and learned that it was the leading law firm in the nation leading
the way in violations of lender liability litigation. 72. The law firm of Capello & Foley and the PLAINTIFF had
numerous communications, although there was never any commitment for
representation by Capello & Foley, it is alleged that the law firm engaged in
conspiracy, collusion, interference with business contracts, interference with
business relations, and had attempted to thwart and cover-up the PLAINTIFFS
Federal False Claims Act complaint by not acting in good faith with the solicitation of
the PLAINTIFF. 73. On July 24, 1987 The
PLAINTIFF conducts a three (3) hour meeting at his residence in Stone Harbor, NJ,
with attorney Lew Schweller regarding legal action concerning all events and
activities of the prior days and months. The PLAINTIFF also gives Lew Schweller a
$500.00 retainers fee, for his representation.<BR style="FONT-
Lew Schweller engaged in conspiracy, collusion, interference with business
contracts, interference with business relations, and had attempted to thwart and
cover-up the PLAINTIFFS Federal False Claims Act complaint. 75. On July 24, 1987, Attorney Joseph Roda invoices The PLAINTIFF
$527.00 for the time and services of July 1 & 2, 1987. 76. On July 30, 1987, The PLAINTIFF had paid $600 to Dr. Levine, a
Psychiatrist from North field, New Jersey, for an objective evaluation of his mental
state of mind, in order to prove the fabricated allegations of 'insanity". Dr. Levine
had conducted a 2-hour meeting in his residence in Stone Harbor, NJ, and required
The PLAINTIFF to complete the Minneapolis Multiphase Personality Inventory (MMPI).
The PLAINTIFF completed the test, and immediately returned it to Dr. Levine. After
several weeks without any communications from Dr. Levine, The PLAINTIFF had
called for the results. Dr. Levine had explained that he had conducted telephone
interviews with members of The PLAINTIFF's family, without notice or consent, in
addition to the original request of The PLAINTIFF to conduct an objective and
confidential examination. In addition, Dr. Levine prescribed Lithium drug therapy,
and disclosed a diagnosis of Bi-Polar Mood Disorder. 77. Dr. Levine engaged in Count IV - extortion, conspiracy to
commit fraud, defamation of character, slander, libel, and obstruction of
justice. 78. On August 6, 1987, the
law firm of Appel, Yost & Sorentino, of Lancaster, Pa., sends a formal notice to
The PLAINTIFF, demanding the return of a facsimile machine leased from the ACM
Company of Lancaster, Pa. Attorney Appel advises The PLAINTIFF that it is the
property of Financial Management Group, Ltd., and should be returned at once or
legal action will follow. 79. Appel
Yost & Sorentino and Attorney Appel engaged in fraud, collusion, libel, slander,
defamation of character, conspiracy to commit Count IV - extortion, interference
with business relations, interference with business contracts. 80. On August 7, 2007 the PLAINTIFF receives a Credit Report from
the Credit Bureau of Lancaster County as requested. The credit report up to the
date of August 1, 1987 verifies and confirms that his credit report was excellent,
without any blemishes. The history of all accounts was "paid within 30 days, or as
agreed". 81. On August 8, 1987, John
M. Wolf, Executive Vice President of Commonwealth National Bank (Mellon Bank)
sends The PLAINTIFF a formal letter advising that the repossession of July 2, 1987
was both lawful and appropriate, and declines to accept a settlement of $5 million
for lender liability violations. 82. On
August 10, 1987, the PLAINTIFF receives a facsimile from the Board of Directors of
Financial Management Group, Ltd., signed by Robert Long as The FMG Board of
Directors threatening to file criminal charges for "embezzlement (we have checks
to prove it), burglary, employee theft, corporate opportunity and slander against our
firm". 83. Financial Management Group, Ltd.,
engaged in obstruction of justice, in unfair competition, wrongful interference with
contracts, trespass to person, criminal trespass, forgery, undo influence, conspiracy,
embezzlement, Count IV - extortion, mental duress, slander, defamation of
character, wrongful interference with business relations, and violated several
bylaws of Financial Management Group, Ltd., <BR style="FONT-
On August 12, 1987, Yolanda Caterbone, mother of The PLAINTIFF, Steve, Phil, Mike,
and Tom Caterbone, all brothers, arrive unexpectedly and uninvited to the residence
of The PLAINTIFF in Stone Harbor. After several requests for the visitors to leave the
premises are denied, several brothers refuse to let The PLAINTIFF leave the
premises. The PLAINTIFF flees, and the brothers chase after him. The PLAINTIFF runs
into a neighbors house to ask to use the telephone to phone the police. However,
after realizing that he is scaring the occupants, he flees to the Stone Harbor Police
Department, a few blocks away, in an effort to obtain a restraining order and to
lawfully have the unwanted persons vacate his residence and personal property.
Officer Steve Conners and Officer Henry Stanford refuse the request, and hold The
PLAINTIFF in custody. After some 30 minutes, the officers, accompanied by Steve
and Tom Caterbone, place The PLAINTIFF into a Police Cruiser and proceed to the
Burdette Tomlin Hospital, in Stone Harbor. Upon arriving, The PLAINTIFF is
interrogated and questioned extensively about a "gun". A hospital staffer then
accuses The PLAINTIFF of an attempted suicide and keep him in custody for 4 or
more hours. An extensive mental health evaluation is performed by another hospital
staffer. The PLAINTIFF is given an ultimatum of signing a contract in order to be
released form the hospital, the contract stated: "I Stanley J. Caterbone will not take
my life tonight or at anytime". 85. Yolanda
Caterbone, Steve Caterbone, Phil Caterbone, Mike Caterbone, Tom Caterbone
engaged in invasion of privacy, civil trespass, obstruction of justice, wrongful
interference with contracts, trespass to person, criminal trespass, forgery, undo
influence, conspiracy, embezzlement, Count IV - extortion, mental duress, slander,
defamation of character, wrongful interference with business relations; and engaged
in psychiatric abuse. 86. The Stone Harbor Police,
James Warner (Current Executive Director of the Lancaster County Solid Waste
Management Authority) and Burdette Tomlin Hospital engaged in obstruction of
justice, wrongful interference with contracts, trespass to person, criminal trespass,
forgery, undo influence, conspiracy, embezzlement, Count IV - extortion, mental
duress, slander, defamation of character, wrongful interference with business
relations and engaged in psychiatric abuse. <BR style="FONT-
On August 13, 1987, the PLAINTIFF At approximately 9:30 am, The PLAINTIFF
returns to the Burdette Tomlin Hospital to obtain a formal copy of the incident the
preceding night. After some arguments1 hospital officials provide explicit records of
the event, including the following summary: "Stan was brought to the ER
(emergency room) by two brothers and police. Police received a phone call from Jim
Warner, (872-9081, friend staying at the Conestoga residence of the PLAINTIFF),
who told them he believed Stan planned to take a gun, go to the beach & kill
himself. Client denied any such statement, thoughts or plans. He has legal and
difficult times, financial deals which have fallen through; license to do financial
planning (his business) revoked; repossessed material goods (airplane); being
blackmailed; and several major financial deals (in which he had invested personal
funds) fall through-but NO PROBLEMS! Denied any Depression. 88. On August 14, 1987, the same family members
again arrive unwanted at the residence of The PLAINTIFF in Stone Harbor, NJ. After
another confrontation, similar to the incident of two evenings before, The PLAINTIFF
fleas to the Avalon Police Department for another attempt to get a restraining order.
However, en route, just a few blocks from the Avalon Police Station, an Avalon Police
cruiser pulls The PLAINTIFF over and arrests him for the following
violations:
a. Driving
Beyond the speed limit. b. Driving an
unregistered vehicle (all required registration materials were in Lancaster, PA)
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">c. Containing an empty beer can in his vehicle
(which was at .1 east three days old) 89. In
addition, the Avalon Police Department repossessed his car and locked it in the
Avalon Police Department compound, which was his only means of transportation
and communication by car phone. 90. Again,
Yolanda Caterbone, Steve Caterbone, Phil Caterbone, Mike Caterbone, Tom
Caterbone engaged in invasion of privacy, civil trespass, obstruction of justice,
wrongful interference with contracts, trespass to person, criminal trespass, forgery,
undo influence, conspiracy, embezzlement, Count IV - extortion, mental duress,
slander, defamation of character, wrongful interference with business relations; and
engaged in psychiatric abuse.<BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
Avalon Police Department engaged in false arrest, false imprisonment, false
statements, civil conspiracy, malicious prosecution and/or malicious abuse of
process claims arising out of the charges and arrest; and (2) civil rights claims under
42 U.S.C. 1983, arising out of the Department's actions or inactions during court
scheduled hearings in 1987.<BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
August 24, 1987, Robert Kauffman sends a letter to Millard Johnson, The PLAINTIFF's
client, regarding his previous intentions of paying the $25,000 demand note of The
PLAINTIFF to Millard Johnson. Robert Kauffman had previously promised to pay the
debt to Millard Johnson during a meeting. Robert Kauffman, told Millard Johnson to
contact the Financial Management Group, Ltd., attorney, Craig Russell in order to
file legal claim, and formally disclosed that he would: no longer handle any
discussions concerning Stanley J. Caterbone. In the last paragraph, Robert
Kauffman discloses "attorney Mr. Patterson, no longer represents the Caterbone
family regarding his pending bankruptcy or guardianship". The PLAINTIFF never
gave any legal jurisdiction or rights to any family member, has never filed for
bankruptcy, was not bankrupt, or even knew of an attorney named Mr.
Patterson. 93. Robert Kauffman and Craig
Russell engage in conspiracy to commit fraud, libel, slander, defamation of
character, conspiracy to commit Count IV - extortion, and false statements.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 94. On September 1, 1987, in an attempt to
resolve issues, The PLAINTIFF calls Financial Management Group, Ltd., board
member P. Alan Loss and requests a meeting with Robert. long and Scott Robertson
to explain allegations of misconduct of Robert Kauffman and Michael Hartlett and
the illegal lockout of The PLAINTIFF. P. Alan Loss agrees and a meeting is set for
September 4, 1987 at 10:00 am in the aide Hickory Inn, a mile away from Financial
Management Group, Ltd., The PLAINTIFF requests that the meeting be in the
strictest of confidence. <BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
September 3, 1987, Attorney Joseph Roda sends The PLAINTIFF a letter requesting
payment of $525.48 in outstanding legal tees for the meetings of July 1 & 2
and copying charges. 96. The PLAINTIFF calls Victor
of Romar Aviation (no charge) to schedule a charter flight from Cape May County
Airport to the Lancaster Airport for September 3rd at approximately 2:00 pm, the
day before the meeting with Financial Management Group, Ltd., executives.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 97. On September 3, 1987, Robert Kauffman
calls detective Larry Sigler of the Manheim Township Police Department to report an
alleged Terroristic threat made two days prior, on September 1, 1987, by The
PLAINTIFF between the hours of 9:00 and 1 pm noontime. Detective Larry Sigler
issues a warrant for the arrest of The PLAINTIFF with District Justice Murray Horton
that was issued at about the same time as the arrival of The PLAINTIFF at Romar
Aviation. 98. On September 3, 1987,
Larry Sigler and the Manheim Township Police Department engage in false
imprisonment, false arrest, malicious prosecution and/or malicious abuse of process
claims arising out of the charges and arrest in September 1987; and (2) civil rights
claims under 42 U.S.C. 1983, arising out of the Department's actions or inactions
in July and September 1987, and January 1991.<BR style="FONT-
On September 3, 1987, At approximately 3:00 pm Mary Lynn Dipaolo picks The
PLAINTIFF up at Romar Aviation for a scheduled visit and dinner. After The PLAINTIFF
becomes annoyed at Mary Lynn Dipaolo's unjustified allegations, The PLAINTIFF
borrows her car to go home to his residence in Conestoga and to go play basketball.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 100. On September 3, 1987, at approximately
7:00 pm, upon leaving the playground, he is approached by Nancy Arment, Financial
Management Group, Ltd., secretary, who is elaborated and crying, asking "why are
you doing this?". 101. Nancy Arment of
Financial Management Group, Ltd., engaged in harassment and conspiracy to
commit Count IV - extortion.<BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
September 3, 1987, At approximately 9:00 pm, in an attempt to recover additional
stolen personal and business tiles, The PLAINTIFF proceeds to the offices of Financial
Management Group, Ltd., where he is greeted by employee Stacy Waters and
allowed to enter the building. The PLAINTIFF insists that Stacy Walters accompany
him throughout the building as he recovers files in the offices of Robert Kauffman,
Michael Bartlett, and Robert Long. In addition retrieving a Back-Up (Financial
Management Group, Ltd., records and communications) copy of the computer
system which he integrated. Upon leaving, The PLAINTIFF temporarily disconnect
the systems which he had integrated and developed for Financial Management
Group, Ltd., which fall under intellectual property rights. Stacy Walters assists The
PLAINTIFF in loading the tiles in his automobile, and The PLAINTIFF kisses Stacy
Walters goodbye, and awaits for her safe return to the building until
leaving. 103. Stacy Walters engaged in
criminal trespass, conspiracy to commit Count IV - extortion, undo influence, mental
duress, slander, defamation of character, and wrongful interference with business
relations. <FONT
after midnight, upon entering his residence, the PLAINTIFF is taken into custody by
the Conestoga Police, and requests that the files that he had taken out of the offices
of Financial Management Group, Ltd., be taken along to prove his rights to the
property, and his position within the company. The PLAINTIFF was then taken to the
jurisdiction of Manheim Township Police, at Where the New Danville Pike meets
South Prince Street, where he is arrested and taken into custody.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 105. On September 4, 1987, at approximately
2:00 am, The PLAINTIFF is arraigned before District Justice Richard R. Reeser for the
following charges: Terroristic threats; burglary; unlawful restraint; unlawful use of
computers; theft by unlawful taking; robbery; and criminal mischief.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 106. Bail is set at $20,000 and The PLAINTIFF
is placed in the Lancaster County Prison. He was not permitted to post real estate
for bail. 107. The Manheim Township
Police Department, Detective Larry Mathias and the Lancaster County Prison engage
in (1) assault, battery, false imprisonment, false arrest, malicious prosecution and/or
malicious abuse of process claims arising out of the charges and arrest in
September 1987; and (2) civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. 1983, arising out of
the Department's actions or inactions in July and September 1987, and January
1991. 108. September 5, 1987 - The Lancaster New
Era and the Lancaster Intelligencer Journal report the alleged crimes, reporting that
The PLAINTIFF is an ax-employee; that Financial Management Group, Ltd., sustained
$60,000 because of his actions; and that he threatened 2 female
employees. 109. The Lancaster
Newspapers, Inc., engaged in libel, slander, defamation of character, conspiracy to
commit fraud, conspiracy to commit Count IV - extortion, conspiracy to commit
obstruction of justice. 110. The entire arrests and
reports fail to acknowledge that The PLAINTIFF is an individual lessee of the
property, and in accordance with law, still holds all of his offices of PING, Ltd., and is
the founder of the company. The above incident further facilitates the ongoing
conspiracy, and publicly discredits The PLAINTIFF in every way, financially,
professionally, and most importantly conveniently supports the continued
allegations of insanity. <BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
September 6, 1987, all attempts to post bail are denied. Robert Beyer appears for
visitation at the Lancaster county prison, completely unexpectedly and unsolicited.
Robert Beyer offers his services and representation with regards to only defending
the criminal charges. <FONT
The PLAINTIFF is given an ultimatum by the Lancaster county prison authorities,
Robert Bayer, Yolanda Caterbone, and Mary Lynn Dipaolo of posting the required
bail only if The PLAINTIFF voluntarily admits himself into the Psychiatric Unit of St.
Joseph Hospital, or remains in the Lancaster County prison. 113. The PLAINTIFF is released from Lancaster County prison, and
immediately escorted to St. Joseph Hospital and admitted into the Psychiatric Unit.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 114. On September 9, 1987, Yolanda
Caterbone, Robert Beyer, and Mary Lynn Dipaolo engage in conspiracy to commit
fraud, false statements, and conspiracy to commit Count IV - extortion, obstruction
of justice, and false imprisonment.<BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
September 15, 1987, The PLAINTIFF questions the legality of the ultimatum for
posting bail, and upon learning that it is unlawful, arranges for his discharge - Upon
his discharge, the St. Joseph Hospital administrators learn that Financial
Management Group, Ltd., had terminated his health insurance, and demand
payment of $3, 064.60 for the six days of hospitalization. The PLAINTIFF is not able
to pay, and leaves the hospital and returns to his residence of Conestoga, PA.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 116. St. Joseph Hospital engaged in collusion
to commit fraud, Count IV - extortion, libel, slander, and defamation of character,
false imprisonment, obstruction of justice, and false
statements. 118. On September 16, 1987, The PLAINTIFF
receives a call from Howard Eisler, an Investigator for the Pennsylvania Securities
Commission who requests a meeting with The PLAINTIFF. A meeting is scheduled for
September 29, and The PLAINTIFF arranges for Robert Beyer and Millard Johnson to
attend. 120. On September 22,
1987,The PLAINTIFF and James Warner settle on the real estate deal, of 433 w.
Marion Street, which The PLAINTIFF had sold to James Warner, at a distressed price,
which still yielded a profit. The profits of the transaction were paid directly to Millard
Johnson, with The PLAINTIFF getting none of the proceeds. Millard Johnsons funds
were extorted by Commonwealth National Bank and Lancaster
Aviation. 121. The parties engaged in
Count IV - extortion of funds, collusion to commit fraud, and civil
conspiracy. <FONT
Art Kerst visits The PLAINTIFF at his residence and accuses him and his cousin of
being connected with the Mafia, and conspiring together, in order to provide the
financing of the $50 million shopping center in Florida, that was originally owned by
the Fisher/Sponougle Group, and diverting the profits of the deal away from him (Art
Kerst) and the Fisher Sponougle Group.<BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
PLAINTIFF becomes infuriated, not only at the absurd allegation, but the timing,
when in fact The PLAINTIFF had bean fighting for his life for the past 4 months, and
to even consider such activities would be insane. 124. On September 29, 1987, Howard Eisler conducts a meeting at
the Residence of The PLAINTIFF, with all parties consenting to have the meeting
recorded by The PLAINTIFF. 125.
Howard Eisler was not able to provide a believable explanation of what he was
investigating or why he had contacted The PLAINTIFF. The PLAINTIFF explains all of
the circumstances regarding his prior meeting with ISC/Chem Con executive Larry
Resch, and details his allegations of wrongdoing of James Guerin/ISC/Chem Con6
and the discussions of that meeting on June 23, 1987, with ISC executive Larry
Resch. The PLAINTIFF also discloses his ISC stock holdings, and his relationships
with ISC and Chem Con associates. 126.
Howard Eisler, the Pennsylvania Securities Commission, and the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania engaged in a cover-up, obstruction of justice, public corruption,
collusion and conspiracy to commit Count IV - extortion. 127. Millard Johnson testifies to Howard Eisler during the meeting
regarding a previous meeting in August with Robert Kauffman, where Robert
Kauffman tried to persuade Millard Johnson to fabricate a story that a legitimate
personal loan of $25,000 to The PLAINTIFF in June of 1987, was instead intended for
investment and embezzled by The PLAINTIFF. Robert Kauffman wanted Millard
Johnson to support this story to authorities. The PLAINTIFF spent more than 4 hours
explaining and detailing all of his allegations and business activities including how
he founded and built Financial Management Group, Ltd.,; his mortgage banking
activities; the illegal repossession of his aircraft; all of the fabricated arrests; and
the chronology of events after the June 23 meeting with ISC executive Larry Resch.
Howard Eisler ended the meeting and requested copies of documents from The
PLAINTIFF. 128. On September 1987,
Scott Robertson, begins work with American Helix founder, David Dering, to secure
financing for the venture and manufacturing facility to manufacture CD Audio
& CD-ROM Compact Discs, an extension of the "Digital" technologies activities
of The PLAINTIFF. 129. David Dering solicited
Financial Management Group, Ltd., to provide help in securing the necessary $5
million of capital required .for the venture. David Dering was referred to Financial
Management Group, Ltd., by Norris Boyd (Financial Management Group, Ltd.,
shareholder) and Bob Fogarty, who had previously been working with The PLAINTIFF
on various financing arrangements. It was The PLAINTIFF that elected to allow both
Scott Robertson and Rob Long to participate in the venture capital markets. Scott
Robertson would later conduct negotiations with High Industries, Inc., to provide the
entire $5 million financial package. Scott Robertson also was named executive Vice
President of American Helix Technology Corporation, and would resign from
Financial Management Group, Ltd., in order pursue the venture on a full time
basis. 130. David Deering, Scott Robertson, and
Financial Management Group, Ltd., engaged in collusion and conspiracy to commit
Count IV - extortion, and violated several anti-trust
violations. 131. James Boyer, formerly
the lead recording engineer for Billy Joel, was also recruited to form the principals of
American Helix, consisting of Dave Dering, Scott Robertson, and James Boyer In mid
December of 1990, David Dering will confirm the above formation of American Helix
to The PLAINTIFF, after The PLAINTIFF alleges violations at the 1934 Sherman
Antitrust Act, concerning his activities in the digital technologies industries, and the
undo influence by Scott Robertson, Robert Long, and High Industries, as well as
criminal conspiracy, of all parties concerned in the destruction of his business affairs
that began in June at 1987.<BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
October 2, 1987, District Justice Murray Horton conducts a preliminary hearing for
all criminal charges against The PLAINTIFF. Attorney Robert Beyer refuses to discuss
any issues regarding his individual lease of the Financial Management Group, Ltd.,
offices, or any issues resulting in the illegal activities of anyone other than The
PLAINTIFF District Justice Murray Horton orders The PLAINTIFF to defend all of the
criminal charges in the next term of criminal court in Lancaster County. The
PLAINTIFF ordered to be bound over for the next term of criminal court of Lancaster
County and remain free on bail. 133. District
Justice Murray Horton engaged in obstruction of justice, collusion and conspiracy to
commit Count IV - extortion, public corruption, and violated several anti-trust
violations 134. On October 4, 1987, The
PLAINTIFF meets with high school classmate and attorney Mike McDonald at The
PLAINTIFF's residence, to discuss legal action and recourse against all involved. Mike
McDonald accepts the case, and The PLAINTIFF provides all of the relevant
information and documentation. 135. Mike
McDonald will engage in negligence, and collusion to commit Count IV - extortion.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 136. On October 12, 1987, The PLAINTIFF
travels to New York city to the offices of Intercon Special Services (white collar crime
detective agency) in order to attempt to obtain assistance in all of the
circumstances. Intercon Special Services, which is staffed with ax FBI agents,
estimates that the services would cost at least $25,000. 137. On October 16, 1987, The PLAINTIFF survives a near death
collision on the New Danville Pike, when a driver ran through a stop sign at the
intersection of Long Lane, while traveling at a speed of 45 mph. The driver hit The
PLAINTIFF's Jeep Cherokee directly in the passengers door, sending The PLAINTIFF
in a free tall, spinning a full 180 degrees and landing upside down in a field, facing
the opposite direction. The PLAINTIFF was trapped in the car, while a passerby
attempted to brake the windshield to get him out. The PLAINTIFF's car was
completely demolished, and he sustained a whiplash. The PLAINTIFF was now
without any means of transportation, in addition to all of his other mitigating
circumstances. 138. On October 18, 1987,
The Unemployment Compensation Review Board formally and officially decides
against a claim for benefits by The PLAINTIFF and cites misconduct and wrongdoing
as the reasons; states that the PLAINTIFF managed the day to day operations, and
used the false arrests as the reason to deny benefits. 139. The Pennsylvania Unemployment Office of the Department of
Public Welfare committed fraud, and were negligence in providing
benefits. 141. In late
October or early November, The PLAINTIFF was driving in the Southern end of the
County, in Conestoga, when he noticed a vehicle following closely. It was about 9:00
pm in the evening, and the roads were deserted in this rural area. The PLAINTIFF
began turning, not going in any particular direction. The ensuing vehicle kept
following, and The PLAINTIFF quickly found himself in a high-speed car chase, that
lasted at least 30 minutes. Finally, The PLAINTIFF arrived near Millersville, and was
able to loose the vehicle.<BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
November 9, 1987, The PLAINTIFF visits with Parent Federal Savings and Loan's
president, John Depatto, to discuss him problems in meeting his current mortgage
payments. John Depatto immediately disclosed to The PLAINTIFF that foreclosure
proceedings have officially begun, and that the full loan of approximately $110,000
is immediately due. The PLAINTIFF stands up from the conference table and
declares, "You tell Mr. James Guerin he is in trouble", and abruptly walks out of the
offices. 143. John Depatto engaged in
collusion to commit Count IV - extortion, and conspiracy to commit
fraud. 144. On November 11, 1987, The PLAINTIFF
meets with representatives of Tabor Community Services, of Lancaster, Pa, in order
to formally apply for assistance to the Pennsylvania Homeowners Emergency
Mortgage Fund, in order to subsidize his monthly mortgage payments, in an effort to
avoid becoming homeless. The PLAINTIFF supplies Tabor community services with
financial data and supportive documents relating to his circumstances, which must
be found to be out of the applicants control in order for financial
assistance. 145. On November 18, 1987,
ISC-Ferranti settlement takes place with Guerin becoming the deputy chairman of
Ferranti and exchanges his is million shares of ISC stock for over 32.2 million shares
of Ferranti stock. <FONT
The PLAINTIFF contacts attorney Jeff Jamounou of McNeese, Wallice, and Nurick,
who The PLAINTIFF retained as legal counsel for the security law, and demanded a
legal opinion as to the offices that The PLAINTIFF formerly held, including his
Financial Management Group, Ltd., Board of Directors seat. Jeff Jamounou disclosed
that he no longer represented Financial Management Group, Ltd., in that capacity,
and that Craig Russell was the attorney now handling issues such as that.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 147. On November 23, 1987, A Referees
Decision by the unemployment Compensation Review Board upholds a recent
decision to deny The PLAINTIFF from collecting any benefits, again citing
misconduct and wrongdoing. The PLAINTIFF calls Howard Eisler, of the Pennsylvania
Securities Commission and demands an explanation for not returning to obtain any
documents as promised in the meeting of September 29th. The phone call was
recorded. <FONT
The PLAINTIFF receives a letter from the Pennsylvania Securities Commission,
Howard Eisler, citing a misunderstanding and lack of communication, and now
requests that The PLAINTIFF submit a written complaint of all allegations discussed
in the meeting of September 29, 1987.<BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
November 30, 1987, The PLAINTIFF fears that the conspiracy now involves local and
state authorities, and delivers 9,079 documents to the Good Sheppard Industrial
Services, of Allentown, PA to be transferred to microfiche in order to preserve the
authenticity of the documents.<BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
PLAINTIFF feared that an attempt would be made to destroy all incriminating
evidence, and given the number of documents, and the lack of money, their
safekeeping was becoming at great risk. 151. For
security reasons, and to remain anonymous, The PLAINTIFF uses the Global
Entertainment Group, Ltd., company for the transaction with the Good Sheppard
Industrial Services company.<BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
November 26, 1987 , The PLAINTIFF visits the Pennsylvania State Police barracks in
Lancaster, to file a formal complaint to the White Collar Crime Division. The
PLAINTIFF was treated as if he was making the entire story up, and received no
help. 153. On December 1, 1987, In continuing the
efforts of the intervention of authorities, The PLAINTIFF visits the PA State Capitol
building and personally delivers documents to the offices of: Pennsylvania Governor
Casey; the Pennsylvania Securities Commission; and Financial Management Group,
Ltd., attorney Jeffrey Jamounou of McNeese, Wallice, & Nurick, all of Harrisburg,
PA. During the same day, at a press conference being held by Mark Singleton, The
PLAINTIFF approaches State Senator Sib Armstrong and Sen. Armstrong refused to
talk and literally ran away in the middle of the State Capitol. 154. On December 4, 1987, Financial Management Group, Ltd.,
holds its first annual shareholders meeting, for the year ended June 30, 1987, at the
Treadway Resort Inn (Eden Resort Inn owned by Drew Anthon). In an effort to
promote propaganda against The PLAINTIFF, and to support the fabricated
allegations of insanity, Financial Management Group, Ltd., president hired armed
security personnel to guard the doorways of the meeting, insinuating that the
meeting was under a threat of violence, and to collaborate his recent allegations of
Terroristic threats, which The PLAINTIFF was previously arrested and awaiting
trial. 155. Financial Management Group, Ltd.,
engaged in libel, slander, and defamation of character. 156. On December 17, 1987, The United States Postal Inspector
acknowledges receipt of formal complaint from The PLAINTIFF regarding executives
from Financial Management Group, Ltd., illegally changing or address; opening of
confidential personal and business mail; and withholding and possibly destroying
confidential personal and business mail at The PLAINTIFF's leased property of 1755
Oregon Pike, Lancaster, PA, also the headquarters of Financial Management Group,
Ltd.,. 157. On January 15, 1988, the PLAINTIFF
drives to San Diego, California, and meets with attorney Sandra Gray, and
International Signal & Control, Plc., uses his dire illegalities and to find access
to due process of the law. In an effort to avoid the political consequences of
obtaining legal counsel, The PLAINTIFF thought that it would be easier to find
adequate and effective counsel from out of state. In addition, The PLAINTIFF needed
some time away from his persecutors. <BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
January 26, 1988, the Pennsylvania Homeowners Emergency Mortgage Assistance
Program formally and officially denies The PLAINTIFF of benefits citing the following:
" Applicant was terminated from job Financial Management Group, Ltd.,), therefore
was not suffering from circumstances beyond his control". 159. On March 14, 1988, The PLAINTIFF is served notice by
Lancaster Constables regarding Parent Federal .Guerin' Bank) v. The PLAINTIFF
Mortgage Foreclosure of his residence at 2323 New Danville Pike, Conestoga,
PA. 160. On May 1988, The PLAINTIFF is forced to
sell his residence, and subdues to the undo influence that he was responsible for all
circumstances, and moves to Florida with his brother. 161. On October 23, 1988 the PLAINTIFF, destitute, without a
personal residence, automobile, or any income, and with accumulated debts of
more than $65,000 from all related incidents in the 1987 "Blackmail", sells his
Financial Management Group, Ltd., holdings to Robert Kauffman and is given
$72,000 in proceeds at settlement. This by and of itself will be proven to be Count
IV - extortion. Robert Kauffman was in fear of The PLAINTIFF exercising his large
voting rights in the upcoming Financial Management Group, Ltd., annual
shareholders meeting, which included the election off Financial Management Group,
Ltd., Board of Directors. The PLAINTIFF had approximately 19% of the outstanding
shares of Financial Management Group, Ltd., and had the potential to vote someone
of his selection to a Board seat. Scott Robertson had solicited the deal for both
parties, and acted as negotiator for both.<BR style="FONT-
On November 23, 1988 the PLAINTIFF completes a management-consulting
proposal for Scott Robertson, Tony Bongiovi, and American Helix for Power Station
Studios of New York. Scott Robertson had solicited the PLAINTIFF to New York to
review the current management and to author a proposal to help Tony Bongiovi
manage the recording studio and all special projects. The PLAINTIFF spent time in
New York and interviewed the Power Station management team and personnel. The
Digital Movie, Mutant Mania project had already been terminated in
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 163. On March 13, 1989, Scott Robertson,
cofounder and executive vice president of American Helix Technology Corporation, a
wholly owned subsidiary of High Industries, Inc., of Lancaster, Pa, recruits The
PLAINTIFF for marketing help. The PLAINTIFF accepts a weekly consulting contract,
with no long-term commitment, in light of his efforts with Radio Science
Laboratories, Inc., Scott Robertson wanted The PLAINTIFF to help develop the new
and emerging CD-ROM business, which was essentially "Digital" technologies.
American Helix was one of 10 domestic manufacturing facilities located in the
continental U.S., for the production of CD-Audio International Signal & Control,
Plc., (CD's or Compact International Signal & Control, Plc.,), and one of only a
few CD-ROM manufacturers. <BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
April 17, 1989, the PLAINTIFF incorporates Radio Science Laboratories, Inc., to
further his interest in microwave technologies, and the telecommunications
industry. The company is a venture with James & Lynn Cross, both capable
design engineers with over 30 years experience. The company was trying to secure
financing for the development of a manufacturing enterprise for Low Noise
Amplifiers, or LNA's as they are commonly referred. 165. On July 8, 1989, William A. Clark, Guerin's former top
INTERNATIONAL SIGNAL & CONTROL, PLC., attorney, sues Guerin for $2 million,
the balance Clark claims is owed him in a $2.75 million settlement (over an
employment dispute) accepted by Guerin in March. Joe Roda is legal counsel for
William Clark. Joe Roda was the first attorney that The PLAINTIFF had gone to for
help, who told The PLAINTIFF to quit fabricating things. 166. On July 19, 1989, The PLAINTIFF, Scott Robertson, and American
Helix agree on a one year employment contract, which American Helix will never
fulfill in its entirety, and will be terminated in the following
April. 167. On October 10, 1989, British Labor
unions urge Ferranti to drop all INTERNATIONAL SIGNAL & CONTROL, PLC.,
related companies, claiming job loss in Scotland alone could exceed 8,000
workers. 168. On October 16, 1989 , A
1987 report commissioned by Sebastian de Ferranti surfaces showing that the
company bearing his family's name was cautioned not to merge with
INTERNATIONAL SIGNAL & CONTROL, PLC., by Lazard Brothers. Ferranti
chairman, Sir Derek,Alun Jones comes under tire by stockholders who demand his
resignation during the company's annual meeting in London. 169. On October 24, 1989 , Scotland Yard joins the U.S. in the
Guerin probe. Federal agents will travel to London in January to coordinate the
investigation. 170. On November 1989, Ferranti
begins firing INTERNATIONAL SIGNAL & CONTROL, PLC., executives still within
the company.
171. On
December 1, 1989, Ferranti sues Guerin and three former INTERNATIONAL SIGNAL
& CONTROL, PLC., executives, including Larry Resch, for $198 million each,
claiming all of INTERNATIONAL SIGNAL & CONTROL, PLC., worth was a sham
built on bogus contracts.
April 1990, The American Helix Board of Directors, lead by S. Dale High/High
Industries, vote to terminate Scott Robertson of American Helix, continue the
financing of the CD-ROM business which The PLAINTIFF was directly managing. The
joint venture agreement with Network Technologies, or Washington, D.C., had lost
an estimated $450,000 in the past 9 months, and the technologies, which were to
be delivered, had proven to be worthless. Scott Robertson had solicited, negotiated,
and administer the deal, The PLAINTIFF had raised serious concerns at to the
capabilities of the technologies, the business, and Network Technologies, early in
the project. High Industries then conducted several meetings with The PLAINTIFF to
purchase the business, however, The PLAINTIFF had told the executive in a meeting
on Good Friday, that he was solely responsible for any business that was left, and
any there was no real value. High Industries agreed to pay The PLAINTIFF his weekly
consulting tee only until June 30, in hopes of negotiating an agreement to keep
American Helix in the CD-ROM business, which was only feasible with The
PLAINTIFF, because of his knowledge and expertise in "Digital"
technologies. 173. On May 5, 1990, the
PLAINTIFF is awarded his first government contract for CD-ROM technologies with
the National Institute of Standards and Technologies (NIST), of Gaithersburg,
Maryland. NIST is the technology arm of the federal government, similar to the
National Institute of Health (NIH), of Bethesda, Maryland. Because of the
technological complexities of the project surrounding the UNIX system environment,
Phillips DuPont (PSO) was the only other competitor in the U.S.. Computer Scientist,
John Garofolo, will coordinate the project, which is responsible for the research and
development of speech recognition systems for the Defense Advanced Research
Projects Agency Information Science and Technology Office (DARPA-ISTO) The
Automated Speech Recognition Group, will supervise the project for MIST. The group
will develop CD-ROM'S containing speech corpora for the scientific I community,
including: Massachusetts institute of Technology (MIT); Texas instruments (TI); SRI
International; and other academic institutions.<BR style="FONT-
On May 21, 1990 the PLAINTIFF and American Helix Technology Corporation,
represented by David D. Dering, sign an agreement authorizing the PLAINTIFF and
Advanced Media Group to continue all CD-ROM activities and to market the services
to the markets-at-large.
October 1, 1990 the PLAINTIFF and American Helix Technology Corporation,
represented by David D. Dering, sign another agreement authorizing the PLAINTIFF
and Advanced Media Group to continue all CD-ROM activities with an agreement for
payments from all activities. The PLAINTIFF was afforded office space, secretarial,
office supplies, marketing materials, and the continuation of all support personnel of
American Helix without expense to the PLAINTIFF. The PLAINTIFF was entitled to
represent all CD-ROM services to the markets-at-large. The PLAINTIFF was to be
paid on all replication, premastering, and mastering charges to the clients. All other
services were billed directly by the PLAINTIFF. The contract and agreement will
continue until the negotiation of another agreement is reached and agreed upon.
Both David D. Dering and the PLAINTIFF have signed and executed the agreement.
The agreement was dated and signed on November 2, 1990. All previous invoices
and work by the PLAINTIFF was grandfathered into this
agreement. <FONT
Department of Justice claims proceeds from the sale of his Naples home after
paying the $600,000 outlined in his guilty plea agreement to the Justice
Department. Ferranti has asked the court to assist in collecting over $189 million
from Guerin, an amount awarded the firm by a British court when it said Guerin
failed to convince the court he had nothing to do with the 31 billion fraud. The
PLAINTIFF begins to organize. all relevant documents, stored in some 30 boxes,
regarding all circumstances involving the "1987" blackmail and criminal conspiracy,
in hopes of finally resolving all outstanding issues, by taking action tar legal
recourse. In response from the effects of Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome, The
PLAINTIFF had rescinded efforts for due process immediately after loosing his home
and businesses. In similar matter of being brainwashed, The PLAINTIFF was fearful
of pursuing due process of the law in fear of continuing reprisals, intimidation, and
retaliation. However, upon the public disclosure of the Federal courts indictments
into illegal ISC activities, the PLAINTIFF began to review his case, and find distinct
and substantiated activities associated directly to his disclosure of fraud within ISC.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 177. On January 9, 1991 Lt. Madenspacher of
the Manhiem Township Police Department call The PLAINTIFF at his lab/office in him
home at approximately 2:00 pm. Lt. Madenspacher explains that he had received a
copy of the letter to the Department of Defense, that Detective Larry Mathias had
forwarded to him. Lt. Madenspacher questioned his motives of the letter and stated:
"What are you going to do.. We (Manhiem Township Police Department) just don't
want to see a multi-million do00000000023llar law suit come down our way.." The
PLAINTIFF responded, "You know that I was an individual leassee of that property,
and in addition I had never resigned any offices or my Board of Director's seat of
Financial Management Group, Ltd., .. You also know that I had met with Larry Resch
of ISC on June 2S, 1987, and that I made allegations of misconduct.." Lt.
Madenspacher responded, "We were forced into that (the arrests of The PLAINTIFF
on Sept. , 1987), we were caught between a rock and a hard place, we were forced
into that". Lt. Madenspacher then changed the subject to "Digital" technologies, and
described the activities of the police department of using the same in the telephone
surveillance of criminal suspects. Lt. Madenspacher then requested to meet with
The PLAINTIFF. The PLAINTIFF agreed, however due to his current busy schedule,
confirmed he would contact him later to schedule a meeting. 178. On January 10, 1991 The PLAINTIFF sends a letter to Lt.
Madenspacher of the Manheim Township Police Department, to schedule a meeting
for Thursday, Jan. 17th at 3:00 pm, at his office at American Helix Technology
Corporation, at the Green field Corporate Park. The PLAINTIFF requested a response
only if the time was in conflict of his schedule.<BR style="FONT-
ON January 17, 1991 Lt. Madenspacher fails to show up for the scheduled meeting
with The PLAINTIFF at Amen can Helix, and never contacted him before that date to
change the meeting, or called to apologize for not being able to keep the prior
commitment. 180. On January 18, 1991 The
PLAINTIFF sends documents concerning the Blackmail" of 1987 to several reporters
of the Lancaster Newspapers,: Tim MeKeele; Earnest Schriber; and Thomas Planner.
Tim MeKeele also received a tape with some excerpts of the September 29, 1987
meeting with the PA Securities Commission, where The PLAINTIFF discusses
allegations of misconduct against J. Guerin and ISC. 181. On January 19, 1991 the PLAINTIFF, Al Thornburg, with Dave
Dering. On Saturday morning, THE PLAINTIFF went to the American Helix facility to
pick up some computer hardware. Upon attempting to unlock the side door
entrance with his 24-hour access security card, the door would not unlock.
Assuming something may have been wrong with the security system, THE
PLAINTIFF drove to the residence of Al Thornburg (former SONY DADC engineer from
Terre Huette, Indiana), the engineer for American Helix. THE PLAINTIFF asked Al to
drive over to see if his access card was operable. The PLAINTIFF and Al Thornburg
entered the building with Al Thornburg's access card and found that his access card
was inoperable throughout the building. Al then said, "Stan, your locked out". THE
PLAINTIFF said, "I was in here until 5: 00pm last evening and my access card worked
fine. THE PLAINTIFF proceeded to pick up the tape back-up and said "Let's go. I
don't want to be arrested for burglary, like I was 3 years ago. I don't know what the
Hell is going on". 182. As the PLAINTIFF and Al
Thornburg left the computer room, Dave Dering appeared. This was quite unusual,
since Al Thornburg and the PLAINTIFF often work on Saturdays, and Dave Dering
had not been in the plant on a Saturday for the past few months. THE PLAINTIFF
said to Dave "Dave, why am I locked out?" He said "talk to Jim Boyer". The
PLAINTIFF, quite emphatically said, "why am I locked out?". "Stan, you'll have to talk
to Jim". THE PLAINTIFF said, "Dave, you are the president, my contract is with you,
not Jim Boyer". Dave said "Now, Stan, just calm down. This isn't a conspiracy
against The PLAINTIFF." THE PLAINTIFF told Al I'm getting out of here. The
PLAINTIFF and Al Thornburg left the building, and Al was especially suspicious of the
events and especially why suddenly Dave Dering showed up at the building on that
particular Saturday, only moments after we arrived at the building.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 183. On January 21, 1991 The PLAINTIFF
Faxed a letter to David D. Dering, afraid of the "LOCKOUT" and the lack of any
events or activities that would explain such a drastic and damaging action of
American Helix citing Dave Dering in breach of the PLAINTIFFS business agreement
and in conspiracy to eliminate or sabotage the PLAINTIFFS business and reputation.
The fax also contained a cc: to High executives, that was never sent.

January 22, 1991 the PLAINTIFF and Dave Dering Dave Dering had a telephone
conversation; "Stan, how did you get in here last night?". Stan "Dave, what are you
talking about?, I won't go near that building, the last time I went back into my own
building after being illegally locked out, I ended up in jail". Dave Dering " How did
you get in here and steal your fax?". The PLAINTIFF replied, Dave, why would I
want to steal the fax that I wrote?" Dave Dering "You have caused a big problem.
You put me in a difficult position I don't know if I can rectify things with the
'High's' and especially Allon Lefevre. I always went to bat for you how do I trust
you?" A meeting was set up for 6:00 pm later that day. 185. January 22, 1991 the PLAINTIFF met with Dave Dering and he
gave three (3) reasons for the "LOCKOUT", although never willing to engage in any
real conversations relating to those issues:
a. The
computer system went down, causing a problem in the security
system. b. Jim Boyer did not reinstall the
PLAINTIFFS access identification number for the security
system. c. Jim Boyer was to talk to the
PLAINTIFF on Friday, the day before the Lockout, concerning eliminating your access
to the facility. 186. Dave Dering said "Jim
Boyer said that he can take over the CD-ROM business no problem". Dave Dering
talked about trust and who to trust. Dave Dering reluctantly agreed to continue the
business relationship and adhere to the agreements, however' only on an arms
length basis. THE PLAINTIFF was no longer allowed in the building except during
normal business hours. THE PLAINTIFF was no longer to have a private office.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 187. Dave Dering never addressed the issues
or the circumstances that preceded the "LOCKOUT", and never addressed the
reasons as to why there was any reason to modify the agreement concerning my
business American Helix that was established back in June of 1990. There were no
disputes, activities, or conversations that gave any indication that American Helix,
Dave Dering, or Jim Boyer intended to change or modify our relationship.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 188. On January 24, 1991: The PLAINTIFF met
with Allon Lefevre (Executive Vice President of High Industries responsible for
overseeing all subsidiaries). The PLAINTIFF called a meeting Allon Lefevre to discuss
the following:
a. The R.R.
Donnelly merger and acquisition of American Helix. b. The "LOCKOUT". 189. Allon
Lefevre asked questions regarding the PLAINTIFFS contact with R.R. Donnelly and
Barry Click (President of R.R. Donnelly GeoSystems, former MAPQUEST). THE
PLAINTIFF quickly made it clear that Barry Click contacted the PLAINTIFF in
December after seeing the PLAINTIFFS advertisement in the CD-ROM Enduser
magazine, published by Linda Helgerson. Barry Glick was elated to see someone in
the local area that was involved with CD-ROM technologies and asked to visit with
the PLAINTIFF. Allon asked many questions about Donnelly and Barry Click. THE
PLAINTIFF made it clear that during the visit, and from the discussions regarding the
strategic plan of Donnelly, THE PLAINTIFF suggested that there might be an
opportunity for a merger or acquisition with American Helix. THE PLAINTIFF also
discussed the capabilities for the facility to be a dedicated CD-ROM manufacturing
facility. THE PLAINTIFF notified Allon Lefevre that Barry Glick was awaiting a call
from the PLAINTIFF the next day concerning the appropriate contact to discuss the
subject of an acquisition. Allon assured the PLAINTIFF that the High's would not
contact Donnelly directly and would await a call from Barry Click.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 190. Regarding the "LOCKOUT" THE PLAINTIFF
gave the three reasons that Dave Dering had provided during our meeting a few
days before to Allon Lefevre. THE PLAINTIFF told Allon that after "THE PLAINTIFF had
built a strong foundation for the CD-ROM business everybody suddenly wants it
back, six months ago, nobody wanted anything to do with it, not to mention the
capital that THE PLAINTIFF had invested in it".<BR style="FONT-
Allon Lefevre was only concerned with why THE PLAINTIFF had sent the Fax. "Why
did you send the Fax? I just don't understand why you sent the Fax". Allon was not
concerned with or wanted to discuss the issue of why THE PLAINTIFF was "LOCKED
OUT". Allon asked the PLAINTIFF the problems surrounding American Helix and what
solutions THE PLAINTIFF thought could help restore the company to stability. THE
PLAINTIFF discussed the lack of systems, the lack of a strong business foundation,
and most Importantly the lack of management. He asked the PLAINTIFF about Dave
Dering and THE PLAINTIFF responded, "Dave Dering is an engineer, not a manager,
he has no real management skills". Allon then asked me how to approach the
meeting with Donnelly. THE PLAINTIFF suggested that they just sit and listen to their
ideas. THE PLAINTIFF asked Allon to assure me that this meeting would be kept
confidential between the two of us. He said "THE PLAINTIFF will have to tell Dave
sooner or later, and that he was not gong to get in the middle of the two of
us". 192. February 15, 1991 the PLAINTIFF met
with Jim Tritch & Allon Lefevre. Allon Lefevre had requested a meeting to be
certain that THE PLAINTIFF was not representing the High's or American Helix. THE
PLAINTIFF had told Allon that THE PLAINTIFF was not concerned with the merger
issue, that the Advanced Media Group was continuing discussions with Barry Click
on various information technologies, which were strictly my business. THE PLAINTIFF
also informed him that Barry Click had told me "Stan, we are quite honestly more
interested in you rather than the facility or American Helix". THE PLAINTIFF also
informed Allon that Barry asked if THE PLAINTIFF would make a trip the Chicago, the
corporate headquarters to discuss the technologies and specifically the
manufacturing technologies of CD-ROM. <BR style="FONT-
THE PLAINTIFF made it perfectly clear that the two (2) contacts for a merger or
acquisition that THE PLAINTIFF had provided to the High's were contacts that
approached the PLAINTIFF. THE PLAINTIFF also notified Lefevre and Tritch that Dave
Dering had requested the PLAINTIFF to look for a joint venture partner as far back as
November. THE PLAINTIFF also made it perfectly clear that THE PLAINTIFF would not
solicit any leads: unless THE PLAINTIFF was to be compensated. Alien Lefevre
suggested that it may help the PLAINTIFF to look for contacts, and THE PLAINTIFF
quite emphatically restated my contentions that THE PLAINTIFF would not do any
work without compensation. 194. Jim
Tritch acknowledged that THE PLAINTIFF was the only person responsible for the
development of the CD-ROM business, and the only person with any real technical
expertise in information technologies and CD-ROM, and that neither American Helix
nor High Industries had the capabilities to manufacture CD-ROMs without the
PLAINTIFF. Jim Tritch also admitted that the Advanced Media Group, Ltd., would have
to be a purchased separately in the case of any merger or acquisition of American
Helix. Jim Tritch also stated that in his initial meeting with Donnelly that they like me
and wanted to continue to work toward a business relationship. Both Allon and Jim
stated that they would like to continue to work with me in the CD-ROM
business. 195. On February 15, 1991
American Helix conducted a Staff Meeting. Through an employee that was present
during the meeting, THE PLAINTIFF had learned that Dave Dering "spent 20 minutes
"slimming", or slandering and defaming the character of the PLAINTIFF, and called
the PLAINTIFF a RUNAWAY EX-CONVICT THAT WOULD END UP IN JAIL SOON". Dave
Dering also told the group that THE PLAINTIFF had almost ruined the company, and
THE PLAINTIFF should not be trusted. THE PLAINTIFF was also informed the previous
day that David Dering was telling persons that the reason that THE PLAINTIFF was
out of town in December was because "THE PLAINTIFF was on the run from
authorities". 196. The PLAINTIFF was in
Captiva, Florida, scanning documents and indexing the CD-ROM AMG Legal
Prototype Disc concerning the ISC Cover-UP.<BR style="FONT-
On January 19, 1991 High Industries American Helix illegally and without notice
locks The PLAINTIFF out of his office and the facility of American Helix, who was
currently under a joint venture agreement with The PLAINTIFF and his Advanced
Media Group, Ltd., for his digital technologies business. This "Lock-Out" was similar
to that of Financial Management Group, Ltd., on July 1, 1987. Again conveniently
when The PLAINTIFF had raised issues and allegations involving Guerin and ISC.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 198. On January 21, 1991 In fear and confused
about his involvement, and in respect to the massive fraud of the ISC/Ferranti
merger, The PLAINTIFF sends a package to Ferrantis legal counsel in England by
way of United Postal Service' Overnight International Delivery Service (Tracking
Number 1773 0619 670).The PLAINTIFF was in fear that a potential "Cover-Up" by
U.S. authorities, and specifically the Lancaster community, would place his life in
danger, and wanted to insure that the information concerning his knowledge of ISC
misconduct before the lSC/Ferranti merger, and his disclosure to local, state, and
federal authorities in the summer of 1987, at least would be received by Ferranti,
reducing the possibility of someone terminating his life in order so that these
circumstances would not be used as an asset in the present Ferranti Legal efforts.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 199. On Jan 22, 1991In an effort to support his
allegations of misconduct and the allegedly threatening activities of The PLAINTIFF,
American Helix president Dave Dering has all of the locks in the building changed
by a professional locksmith, which is nothing more than an act of propaganda. Later
that day, The PLAINTIFF and David Dering meet. David Dering resolves to only allow
The PLAINTIFF in the building during normal business hours, and does not allow him
to occupy his own office. The PLAINTIFF has never been given any reason why he
was locked out in the first place. <BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
February 1, 1991 ABC News 20/20 features the story "Weapons Sales to Iraq" about
the ISC/Cardoen cluster bomb technology and how it got to Saddam Husain.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 201. On Feb 17, 1991 The PLAINTIFF receives
a letter from Sandra K. Paul, of the Citizens Ambassador Program, a division of
People to People International, notifying him that he has been selected to
participate in the upcoming Printing and Publishing Delegation to the Soviet Union
and Eastern Europe in the coming August. People to People International is a
nonprofit organization started by the late Dwight D. Eisenhower to facilitate the
communications of experts from various professions throughout the world. The
objective of the delegation was to exchange ideas, information, and technologies of
the printing and publishing industries with American counterparts in the Soviet
Union, and various Eastern European countries. 202. On February 22, 1991 Federal prosecutors seize $800,000
from Clark, claiming he was privy to information about ongoing criminal acts within
ISC that generated the tainted cash. <BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
February 1991 In an American Helix staff meeting, with all employees present, but
The PLAINTIFF, president David Dering had spent approximately 20 minutes alleging
that The PLAINTIFF almost ruined his company, and that he "is a runaway ex-
convict, that will end up in jail very soon". Engineer Al Thornburg, immediately
following the meeting, disclosed the above discussion. 204. On May 23, 1991 At approximately 2:00 pm, Jay Curtis,
(appearing as a Department of Defense contractor, who had recently solicited the
services of The PLAINTIFF and his Advanced Media Group, Ltd., to provide
engineering in the development of "Digital" simulation and training applications for
various U.S. Military Logistics bases) had called The PLAINTIFF. The following is
synopsis of the conversation: "Because of your recent discussions concerning your
knowledge and information about the ISC Scandal, and an alleged "Cover-Up", I had
to do a background check on you, to insure against any problems when including
you in by proposal to the U.S. Department of Defense... Everyone backs up your
story, and is looking over your documents now, including the CIA, IRS, SEC, FBI,
Scotland Yard, Attorney General, the British M-4, and others. They are all verifying
and confirming your "cover-up" allegations.. They don't know what to tell the Press
and Media "I also know that you submitted documents to Mr. Thomas Flannery of
the Lancaster Intelligencer Journal". "How did you know about the CIA and its
involvement with ISC, how did you know that, and what do you know?" Jay Curtis
kept pushing The PLAINTIFF on the CIA issue, and what he had known and how he
knew, The PLAINTIFF kept telling him that the whole situation was to emotional, and
that he was afraid for his life. The PLAINTIFF had to eventually tell Mr. Curtis that he
could not discuss this anymore. He abruptly changed the subject and hung up on
Mr. Curtis. The PLAINTIFF immediately went to a friends house, and disclosed that
fact that he was in fear for his life. He quietly sat on the steps with his friend, Abby
(2 years old). Later that night, his friend Dave Pflumm would take him to the corner
bar for a few drinks, while unknowing to The PLAINTIFF, Ted Koppel was disclosing
the story of the CIAs involvement with ISC. Several hours later, Ted Koppel broke
the story about the CIA and ISC's covert operations to sell arms to Iraq.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 205. Immediately following the conversation
with Mr. Jay Curtis regarding the CIA and ISC, The PLAINTIFF packed a suitcase and
confidential information assets, in preparation to leave Lancaster, in total and
legitimate fear for his life. <BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
May 23, 1991 ABC News/Nightline and Ted Koppel feature the first in a series of
stories, relating to CIA knowledge of a covert operation to supply munitions to south
Africa implemented by ISC and Carlos Cardoen. The story featured Lancaster and
ISC. The report ties Guerin to the National Security Agency project in the 1970s.
ABC News, the Financial Times of London, and the Lancaster Intelligencer News
investigated the report. Tom Flannery of the Lancaster Intelligencer Journal
appeared on the program and was given credits on the show.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 207. On May 24, 1991 The Lancaster
Intelligencer Journal reports on the above story. At approximately 1:30 pm, The
PLAINTIFF drives out of Lancaster, en route to a safe haven, and stops at a
convenience store and reads the early edition of the Lancaster New Era, learning for
the first time of ABC News/Nightline story about ISC and the CIA the evening before,
just hours after his conversation regarding the same to Jay Curtis.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 208. On June 7, 1991 The PLAINTIFF is again
arrested by the Stone Harbor Police. After passing several sobriety tests, and two
Breathalyzer tests, The PLAINTIFF is placed in a jail cell, and refused to be released.
Several hours later, The PLAINTIFF is cited for outstanding arrests warrants of
Avalon, NJ, dated back to August 14, 1987, by an officer of the Avalon Police
department who suddenly appeared. Both arresting officers demanded $340.00 for
the posting of bail. The PLAINTIFF requested that the required cash be retrieved
from his car, located just a few blocks away. The Avalon police officer responded by
saying, "we can't let you go to your car, you may have a gun in there". The
PLAINTIFF was immediately escorted to the cape May county Prison, fingerprinted
and processed. 209. On June 8, 1987 The
PLAINTIFF calls Mike Orstein, Lt. of the Stone Harbor police patrol, and requests that
he retrieve the required cash from his car, and post the required bail. At
approximately 2:30 pm, The PLAINTIFF is released on bail. On June 11, 1991 The
PLAINTIFF left the Stone Harbor Marina at approximately 12:30 am en route to
Lancaster, Pa, to retrieve some files concerning the ISC cover-up. Upon driving north
on Route 47 (the normal route to Lancaster), approximately 10 miles outside the
Cape May county Courthouse, The PLAINTIFF noticed a car following him closely.
Suspicious, The PLAINTIFF decreased his speed from 55 mph to 35 mph, in order for
the car to pass him. However, the car remained directly behind, adjusting the speed
accordingly. In an effort to elude the car, without raising suspicion, The PLAINTIFF
gradually increased his speed, while also increasing the distance between the cars,
resulting in the loss of his taillights to the ensuing vehicle - Because of the winding
road, The PLAINTIFF looked for an abrupt turn-off, in hopes of dashing the eluding
vehicle, by loosing sight of his taillights. There was little or no traffic on the route
during the early morning hours, and The PLAINTIFF stopped at an intersection, and
noticed that the headlights of the ensuing vehicle were not visible in his rear view
mirror, meaning that his taillights were also not visible to the ensuing vehicle.
Immediately upon pulling from the intersection, The PLAINTIFF noticed a narrow dirt
road that lead into a field of small trees, the perfect place to sit for the ensuing auto
to pass him, unnoticed. The ensuing vehicle pulled to the intersection, and
continued north on route 47, in the direction of Lancaster. 
 The PLAINTIFF sat in his vehicle a few
minutes, until continuing on his travel, north on Route 47. Approximately five (5)
minutes later, a car traveling in excess of SS mph, approached The PLAINTIFF,
traveling south on the same road (2 lanes).As the two cars approached each other,
and approximately 30 yards from reaching each other, the approaching vehicle
drove directly into the lane of The PLAINTIFF, with its high beams on, and continued
straight for his vehicle, or what appeared to be a head-on-collision. The PLAINTIFF
drove off of the berm of the road, missing a line of trees by less than 12 inches
(eluding a life threatening disaster), and passed the vehicle that was still in the
north bound lane, heading south. The PLAINTIFF, shaking and sweating furiously,
noticed the cars brake lights go on, and the car apparently turned around, and
began pursuing The PLAINTIFF again. The PLAINTIFF drove as fast as he could to
Route 55, hoping to find traffic in order to hide and loose the pursuing car. The
PLAINTIFF arrived in Lancaster, at approximately 3:00 am, and again noticed a car
sitting in the parking lot of the vacant "Sportsman's Den", at the intersection of the
New Danville Pike and Prince Streets. Upon driving west on Hershey Avenue, The
PLAINTIFF noticed the car following him. In an effort to identify the license plate,
The PLAINTIFF made a few turns in the area of Hamilton Watch, and followed the car
heading north on S. West End Avenue. The car was a late model, gold or tan, Cougar
or possibly a Buick Park Avenue. The PLAINTIFF watched the car increase his speed,
and finally changed directions and proceeded to his residence, and parked a few
blocks away, and walked through the woods, to his apartment in the Hershey
Heritage complex. The PLAINTIFF then used a flashlight, in order not to reveal his
presence, and returned to his vehicle, sometime in the early morning, during
daylight. 210. On June 10, 1991 two
independent U.S. courts uphold a $189 million award by Britian's High Court against
ISC executives Shireman and Larry Reach for their role in the fraud. Ferranti makes
its first open statement against Guerin saying a similar decision is expected to
uphold the High Court's decision against him. <BR style="FONT-
On June 19, 1991 - The PLAINTIFF leaves Stone Harbor, in constant fear for his life,
and remains in seclusion, in various parts of the Eastern Seacoast, spanning from
Captiva Island, Florida, to Boston, MA, in order to prepare an official request for a
Congressional Investigation of all related matters. 212. On Jul 11, 1991 The PLAINTIFF files an official request C300
pages) for a Congressional Investigation into all of the ISC and preceding issues with
U. S. Representative Robert Walker CR-Pennsylvania), and Speaker of the House, U.
S. Representative Thomas Foley. Overnight Mail Service of the United States Post
Office, outside of Baltimore, Maryland, sent both requests. 213. On July 12, 1991 The PLAINTIFF returns to his home, in
Lancaster, PA, at approximately 1200 pm, after remaining in seclusion immediately
following the phone conversation of May 23, 1991 with Jay Curtis, regarding the CIA
and ISC. ABC News/NightLine features it's second story about Lancaster's ISC and
Arms to South Africa and Iraq. <BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
18, 1991 U.S. Representative Robert Walker sends a letter to The PLAINTIFF relating
to his request for a Congressional Investigation into all of his allegations of
misconduct and criminal wrongdoing regarding his alleged ISC/Fraud "cover-up".
The letter said : "Thank you for your recent letter and information on International
Signal & Control corporation. I appreciate your thinking of me; however, since
this case is before the courts, it is unethical for me to interfere with the judicial
process. If you think I may be of assistance with other matters, please feel free to
contact me". 215. On July 25, 1991
Christian is released from prison after serving two years and a day for his role in the
Chem Con fraud and toxic waste dumping. <BR style="FONT-
On August 1, 1991 The PLAINTIFF receives a notice of a warrant for his arrest by the
Stone Harbor (NJ) Municipal Court, regarding summons #081370. The PLAINTIFF
called the Court Clerk, Pam Davidson, to explain the circumstances. The Court Clerk
refused to identify herself, and did not have time to listen to his explanation. She
then questioned why he (The PLAINTIFF) wanted to write to the Judge to explain.
The PLAINTIFF writes a formal letter to Judge Peter M. Tourison, of the Stone Harbor
Municipal Court explaining his allegations of misconduct, and the issues surrounding
his recent arrest of June 7th, and all of the arrests dating back to August of 1987.
The PLAINTIFF had described in detail his assertions and evidence that the arrests
were conveniently orchestrated while he was seeking legal recourse for the alleged
ISC "Cover-Up'. The PLAINTIFF also explained his fear for not returning to the Stone
Harbor Municipality, in light of the fabricated arrests, and other questionable
incidents. The PLAINTIFF requested another means of settling all outstanding
frivolous traffic violations, other than appearing in Stone Harbor Municipal Court.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 217. On August 8, 1991 Stone Harbor
Municipal Court Judge, Peter M. Tourison, sends The PLAINTIFF an official letter
acknowledging receipt of his previous letter and explanations. Judge Tourison
concluded his notice by demanding that The PLAINTIFF appear in Court, as
scheduled, "to have this matter taken care of in the proper manner
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 218. On August 13, 1991 Ferranti announces it
has recovered $650,000 hidden by Guerin in a number of Swiss Hank accounts.
Ferranti also announces a fiscal 1991 loss of $282 million. The PLAINTIFF responds
to Judge Tourison letter of August 8, and discloses the recent attempt on his life, the
past June, just outside or Stone Harbor, and states that because of the apparent
criminal conspiracy within the same municipality, The PLAINTIFF formally notifies
the Judge that he refuses to return to Court, as requested. 219. On August 15, 1991 Guerin and Cardoen are shown to have
been deeply involved in a failed $100 million arms procurement plot linked to the
infamous Iran-Contra scandal.<BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
August 16, 1991 The PLAINTIFF receives a formal notice and demand from American
Helix President David D. Dering, for the return or equipment, currently in the
possession of The PLAINTIFF, and notice of the termination of the business
agreement, dated October 1, 1990 between Stan J. Caterbone and American Helix
Technology Corporation. The PLAINTIFF receives a facsimile from Mike Hess (former
ISC engineer who frequented S. Africa and who solicited The PLAINTIFF in late 1989
for work), and refuses to sign a non-disclosure agreement with The PLAINTIFF and
the Advanced Media Group, Ltd., as requested to continue a further relationship
considering the recent activities from the May 23rd phone call and the national
media publicity regarding the ISC Scandal. <BR style="FONT-
On August 19, 1991 The PLAINTIFF sends a letter to attorney Timothy Lanza via the
Lancaster Bar Association, and asks for an explanation as to his misrepresenting to
The PLAINTIFF for the past month that his order for Advanced Media Group, Ltd.,
stock certificates were ordered, when in fact The PLAINTIFF verified with authorized
personnel of the H. Burr Kein company that the order was never placed. Timothy
Lanza had personally disclosed to The PLAINTIFF on several occasions that he was
awaiting the delivery of the certificate kit via UPS. The PLAINTIFF responds to the
previous letter of David D. Dering, and his request for the return of American Helix
equipment, currently in the possession of The PLAINTIFF. The PLAINTIFF formally
notifies David Dering that the equipment will be held as collateral, according to
statutes of the Pa. Uniform Commercial Credit code, that the equipment will not he
returned until the past due invoice {# 1018), of the Advanced Media Group, Ltd., of
July 12, 1991 for $4,914.00, which was due upon receipt according to their business
agreement, was paid in full.
August 29, 1991 A federal judge dismisses Christian's $93 million suit against
Guerin, but Christian vows to re file the suit. 
September 13, 1991 ABC News/Nightline features another story about ISC, the CIA,
and Arms Deals, in preparation for the beginning of the-Confirmation Hearings of
George Bush's nomination or the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, Robert
Gates, which begins just three days away, by the Senate Intelligence Committee.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 224. On September 16, 1991 The first day of
the Robert Gates' Confirmation Hearings brings questioning by Senator Murkowski,
of the Senate Intelligence Committee, about knowledge of the ISC operations by
Robert Gates. Gates, whose candor about Iran-Contra resulted in his 1987 withdraw
when nominated for the same slot by then President Reagan. In a less-than sincere
line of questioning, Robert Gates denies any knowledge of ISC, Guerin, or Carlos
Cardoen, including any operations to sell munitions to Iraq or south Africa. In
addition, he denies any knowledge of any CIA involvement in the same.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 225. On September 19, 1991 The PLAINTIFF
visits the office of Senator Bill Bradley (D-New Jersey), in the Hart Office Building,
Washington, D.C., and delivers documents, tapes, and a video, all relating to his
allegations of an alleged "Cover-Up" regarding the ISC Scandal. The materials were
taken by assistant Jackie Widrow, who signed a receipt. 226. On September 21, 1991 The PLAINTIFF delivers a contract for
the consulting services he has agreed to provide to J. Oman Landis, in order to
 insure against any wrongdoing, and especially in light of Mr. Landis' assertion
the previous Friday that "you (The PLAINTIFF) are taking a break (from business) to
rest your mind". This assertion conveniently supports the alibi of mental insanity,
that has been made by numerous persons, including Mr. Landis' friends, the High's,
who wholly own American Helix Technology corporation. Several hours after
delivering the contract to Mr. Landis, and after beginning to work, as outlined in the
contract, Mr. Landis called The PLAINTIFF into his office and said "there were some
developments over the weekend, why don't you continue on your normal duties of
driving (limousines), this has nothing to do with the contract that you asked me to
sign". 227. On September 25, 1991 The
PLAINTIFF mails a cover letter and accompanying materials to attorney Howard
Corny, of New York city, as previously discussed, via UPS regular way service.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 228. On October 1, 1991 The PLAINTIFF
receives a facsimile from David Dering, President of American Helix, formally
charging The PLAINTIFF with charges of 16,730.00. David Dering also demands that
the equipment be returned, and upon receipt, American Helix would forgive
$11,816.00 ($16,730 - $4914)(Caterbone's invoice) of unpaid charges to The
PLAINTIFF and or the Advanced Media Group, Ltd., 229. On October 1, 1991 The PLAINTIFF sends by certified mail, a copy of
a recent complaint (filed Sep. 6, 1991) to the New Jersey Department of Motor
Vehicles, and a demand for the title to his boat, and again allegations of criminal
wrongdoing by the Stone Harbor Marina, for not delivering title, given the bill of sale
was satisfied on June 10, 1991, and a fee for the title was paid as well.
personally meets with Ted Koppel, of ABC News/Nightline, at the Washington
National Airport, at approximately 5:30 pm. The PLAINTIFF questioned Ted Koppel if
he knew a Mr. Jay Curtis, and why he was questioned about the CIA's involvement
with the ISC affairs, just hours before the broadcast. Ted Koppel denied any
knowledge of Mr. Jay Curtis, and stated that Thomas Flannery was involved in the
broadcast by the Financial Times of London. The letter of August 28, 1987 to Diane
sawyer was also mentioned. Ted Koppel requested the phone number of The
PLAINTIFF, and said that he would contact him later, due to his present time
constraints, and asked, "what do you want, and what is the story line?" The
PLAINTIFF responded, "Justice and protection, someone is trying to cover me up,
and someone already made attempts on my life... someone keeps getting
information from me, while I'm left sitting in Lancaster like a sitting duck".
responds by facsimile, to the Oct. 1, correspondence, to David D. Dering. The
PLAINTIFF requested supportive documentation regarding the suspicious charges of
$16,730.00 as declared, in order to consider the request for the return of the
equipment. David C. Dering responds by facsimile, demanding for The PLAINTIFF to
meet him at the Holiday Inn, in Lancaster on Friday, Oct 4th, with the equipment in
his possession, and states that he will deliver the required supportive
documentation of the charges as requested. 
October 2, 1991 The PLAINTIFF responds by facsimile to Ted Koppel, as to his
question concerning the "story line". <BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
October 27, 1991 The PLAINTIFF writes a letter to Sandra Woods, Associate
Managing Editor, of the Philadelphia Inquirer, regarding the recent feature story,
"What went wrong in America" The PLAINTIFF describes his experience and present
situation regarding the ISC scandal, and cites corruption as the cause of the present
dire and destitute circumstances controlling his life. 
234. On October 31,
1991 Guerin and 19 others, including Larry Reach, are indicted on 75 criminal
counts by the Philadelphia based grand jury.
October 31, 1991 Laura McQueen, administrator for the New Jersey Department of
Motor Vehicles, called The PLAINTIFF at approximately 3:30 pm, to notify him that
she was trying to sort out the problem with his complaint regarding title to his boat.
Ms. McQueen acknowledged that the Stone Harbor Marina had submitted an
application for a title, apparently dated on or about June 10, however the identity of
the boat did not match that of The PLAINTIFFs. Ms. McQueen also admitted that
there seemed to be evidence of wrongdoing, but denied to state whether the matter
was presently being investigated. Ms. McQueen also stated that the title in question
was being microfiche, and that within a few days, they should be able to trace the
title, and resolve the problem. <BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
October 31, 1991 Robert Clyde Ivy, Terrance Faulds, Wayne Radcliffe, Gerald
Schuler, and Thomas Jaslin enter a not guilty pleas to all charges handed down by
the Philadelphia grand jury. <BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
November 24, 1987 Robert Shireman, ISC financial executive pleads his guilt in the
ISC $billion fraud and scandal. Anthony Stagq, ISC executive in charge of Singapore
operations, pleads guilty in the Arms Export violations.
November 27, 1987 ISC Executive Larry Resch pleads guilty to his role in the
massive contract fraud in the Ferranti/ISC merger of November, 1987.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 239. On December 3, 1991 Philadelphia grand
jury hands down a "superseding indictment", clarifying the money-laundering
portion of the charges. The indictment states that between November of 1986 and
June of 1989, Guerin looped $450 million through phony bank, vendor, -and
customer accounts to give the appearance several of the bogus ISC contracts were
real. The preceding information also allows for the possibility of an indictment of
William Clark, and possibly his attorney Joseph Roda. The largest of the fake
contracts was the Pakistan Missile deal, in which Larry Resch was charged and
indicted by the grand jury for managing. 
December 3, 1991 Mike Hess, a former ISC engineer that also has done work for The
PLAINTIFF, visits The PLAINTIFF to deliver all materials in his possession which is the
property of the Advanced Media Group, Ltd., The PLAINTIFF and Mike Hess engage
in an argument when Mike Hess becomes annoyed at The PLAINTIFFs continued
caution and suspicion of Mike Hess's real motives and agenda for the relationship.
The PLAINTIFF had witnessed several incidents of inconsistencies with the attitude
of Mike Hess, with specific respect regarding The PLAINTIFF's efforts for justice and
legal recourse concerning the affairs of 1987. The PLAINTIFF admitted in several
occasions that he will never trust anyone, especially given his former association
with ISC, and most importantly his activities and travel to South
Africa. 241. On December 4, 1991
The PLAINTIFF calls the Citizens Commission of Human Rights, after seeing the
organization featured on the Murray Povich Show, and talks to Roy Griffen. The
organization's mission is to investigate abuses within the mental illness profession.
Roy Griffen requests information, and agrees to investigate his allegations. The
PLAINTIFF states that he will Federal Express a copy of this chronology.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 242. On December 5, 1991 At approximately
10:00 am, The PLAINTIFF sent a package of information via Federal Express
(tracking number 9734766S93) to: Roy Griffen, Citizens Commission for Human
Rights, 6362 Hollywood Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90028, (800) 869-2247. The package
was received at 9:56 am (PST) by L. Mezkerlsl, at the front desk.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 243. On December 5, 1991 At approximately
4:52 pm, James Guerin pleads guilty to eight (B) grand jury indictments of October
31. The indictments are as follows: Criminal Conspiracy, Violation, Arms Export
Control Act Violation, Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid act. Money Laundering,
Securities Fraud, Filing False Income Tax Return, Aiding and Abetting the
Commission of crime. Sentencing is scheduled for February 25, 1992, with a
minimum of 14 years, and a maximum of Life in prison. 244. On December 4, 1991The PLAINTIFF receives uninvited
visitors at his residence, cousin Sam Miller family, who in September left him
stranded in Florida. They conveniently need a place to stay, while visiting in
Lancaster, and purposely cause distractions to his efforts for legal recourse.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 245. On December 11, 1991 The PLAINTIFF
finally requests that Michelle and Jason Miller vacate his residence.
receivers a notice from the Internal Revenue Service regarding a discrepancy in
income reported on his 1989 Federal Income Tax Return. The items in question were
his "disability income" from Monarch life insurance and American Helix "non-
employee income". 247. On December 23, 1991
The PLAINTIFF responds to the IRS letter and submits a copy of the chronology of
this conspiracy, along with the entire audio transcript (2 - 90 minute cassettes) of
his meeting of September 29, 198? with the Pennsylvania Securities Commission
and requests assistance in his ordeal. The correspondence was sent via 'Return
Receipt Requested" in order to insure proof of delivery. The PLAINTIFF sends an
updated chronology to Roy Griffen of the Citizen's Commission for Human Rights.
sends a formal notice to attorney Howard Cerny, 245 Park Avenue, New York,
informing him to return the previously submitted information and tapes regarding
this case, and also informing him that he no longer wishes to discuss these issues
with him or any member of his firm. <BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
December 30, 1991 The PLAINTIFF travels to the U.S. 9:50 am courthouse in
Philadelphia, PA, and personally delivers the chronology and a copy of the "1987"
Pennsylvania Securities Commission meeting to Chief Judge Bechtle, who is
presiding over the ISC court preceding. At 10:00 am The PLAINTIFF visits the U.S.
Attorney Generals office in the same building and files a formal complaint, "Criminal
Conspiracy to "cover-up" the International Signal a Control scandal. The proper form
is filed with the clerk. Assistant U. S. Attorney General Gray asks The PLAINTIFF to
briefly describe his complaint. The PLAINTIFF gives Gray the chronology along with
the tapes. The PLAINTIFF briefly describes the meeting of June 23, 1987 with Larry
Resch, the nay 23, 1991 phone call from Jay Curtis, the arrests by Manheim
Township, and the attempts on his life. Agent Gray took notes, and said he is not
familiar with the case, but would personally see that the information is passed to
the proper authorities involved in the case. During the conversation, Mr. Gray asked
the exact same question that was asked by both Joe Roda and Investigator Eisler of
the Pennsylvania Securities Commission) "But you did not work for them (ISC), you
were not involved with them?" The PLAINTIFF gave this response to all questions by
Mr. Gray: It's all in there (the chronology), all of the information and events".
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 250. On January 6, 1992 The PLAINTIFF sends
a copy of the criminal conspiracy chronology and a complete audio transcript of the
PA SEC meeting of 1987 to the legal counsel of the Pennsylvania Securities
Commission via Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested: P825 695 935.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 251. On January 8, 1992 At a "Town Meeting"
in Columbia, Pennsylvania held by U. S. Senator Arlen Specter, The PLAINTIFF
personally delivers a copy of the criminal conspiracy chronology to Anon Specter
after the meeting and asks Arlen Specter to read the letter, Mr. Specter replied, " I
will do that". 252. On January 9, 1992 The
PLAINTIFF receives the Return Receipt from the Pennsylvania SEC, signed by Sharon
F. Heinspach on January 8, 1992. 253. On
November 8, 1997 the PLAINTIFF solicits Attorney Matt Samley, of the law firm of
Xelkallis, Reese and Pugh (Pflumm Contractors Corporate Attorney and David
Pflumms Attorney), to provide a legal opinion as to the circumstances involved in
the cover up. Mr. Samley quickly asks if anyone had called Stan Caterbone about
the issues. Mr. Samley agrees to review the documents and will provide a legal
opinion of any criminal and prosecutorial misconduct. 254. On November 23, 1997 - the PLAINTIFF delivers materials to
Mr. Samley and also sends via Federal Express the same materials to Christina
Rainville, of Shnader, Harris, Lewis, and . With a letter requesting a legal opinion
from Ms. Rainville. Stan Caterbone had read the biography of Ms. Christina Rainville
parts of which were published as part of a story for the Lisa Michelle Lambert
murder trial and was impressed with her experience in the litigation of securities
violations, software and computer cases, entertainment, and of course the wide
array of allegations of prosecutorial misconduct in the Lancaster County District
Attorneys Office and the East Lampeter Police Department. The PLAINTIFF knew he
needed someone that was not afraid to challenge and take on the Lancaster
Establishment. 255. On December, 8, 1997 -
Ms. Pam Pflumm call Dr. Albert Shultz regarding the behavior of the PLAINTIFF.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 256. On December 15, 1997 - the PLAINTIFF
telephones Jim Christian to again confirm that he did not have knowledge of his
meeting with Mr. Larry Resch. Jim Christian began threatening the PLAINTIFF from
public disclosure of these issues, he said you have to forget about it. Your life will
be worse off than it is now, you better just forget it 257. In December of 1997 The PLAINTIFF had made a journal of all
of the mental and psychological duress that the employees of the firm of Pflumm
Contractors, Inc., had engaged. The PLAINTIFF started to log incidents of mental
duress in December of 1997 after the incidents became consistent and
demonstrated not be random acts of mere occurrences. This behavior and malicious
treatment was an extreme divergence from the previous 45 months of my tenure
and a polarization of the PLAINTIFFS relationships with all employees involved,
including Mr. David Pflumm. Prior to these incidents the PLAINTIFF was credited with
saving the company from near bankruptcy (1993) and leading the company to the
highest level of profitability, marketability, financial stability, and respect in the 20
year history of the company. Pflumm Contractors, Inc. was generating over $4
million dollars per year in revenues. <BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
January 14, 1998 The PLAINTIFF visits with Fr. Edward Lavelle for advice and
guidance concerning his situation. the PLAINTIFF only asked that Fr. Lavelle call Mr.
David Pflumm, and ask he and is key employees refrain from inflicting any
additional mental duress upon his person Fr. Lavelle refuses unless he is told to do
so by Dr. Al Shulz. He offers no further assistance. 1:00 pm A few hour later, the
PLAINTIFF visits Dr. Al Shulz for his quarterly appointment. Immediately upon
entering the appointment, and before the plaintiff will speak any words, Dr. Al Shulz
will contemporaneously accuse the plaintiff and declare: Stan, you are very sick.
You are not well! You need to take additional medications. The recorded transcript
will prove the horrid implications of these conversations. 259. On February 20, 1998 the
PLAINTIFF is forced to vacate his position of Controller of Pflumm Contractors, Inc.,
due to the purposeful and intentional infliction of mental duress, perpetrated as a
direct reprisal against the PLAINTIFFS rightful pursuit of due process of the law
concerning all issues contained herein. <BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
April 21, 1998 The Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry will again
illegally deny the Plaintiff of his legitimate claim for Unemployment Compensation
Benefits, which again is an act of reprisal against his rightful pursuit of fair access to
the law, and his disclosures of the incidents contained herein. The Pennsylvania
Department of Labor and Industrys 1987 rulings against the Plaintiff have been also
proven to be in err, which conveniently and intentionally subjects the Plaintiff to
financial hardship and mental duress, all purposefully hindering the Plaintiffs right
to access the law. The record of the plaintiffs claim for Unemployment
Compensation Benefits is corrupted.
November 25, 2004, Thanksgiving day, the PLAINTIFF was inside his residence with
the doors locked. At approximately 11:30 am Dave Pflumm, Lizzy Pflumm, and
Keagan Pflumm began knocking on the back patio door. The PLAINTIFF did not want
to accept the visitors and would not answer the door. The visitors had not been at
the residence for at least 4 or 5 months and the PLAINTIFF had not been to the
residence of the Pflumms since July of 2002. After the unwanted visitors would not
leave, the PLAINTIFF went downstairs to the back bedroom hoping they would leave.
Lizzy Pflumm and Keagan Pflumm then began banging on the lower daylight door
and the front door. The PLAINTIFF then began lifting weights. After approximately 20
minutes Keagan and Lizzy Pflumm appeared inside the back bedroom. The
PLAINTIFF quickly questioned them how they got into the residence of the
PLAINTIFF. Keagan Pflumm said he used a credit card to open the back patio door.
They both said that their father, Dave Pflumm was upstairs sitting at the
PLAINTIFFS kitchen bar. They walked upstairs and the PLAINTIFF immediately
questioned Dave Pflumm as to how they broke into the PLAINTIFFs residence. Dave
Pflumm responded that I have keys, everyone has keys to your house. The visitors
stayed for about an hour before leaving. This incident has been reported to the
Southern Regional Police Department and the PLAINTIFF had questioned the
Southern Regional Police Department if the incident was ever investigated. The
PLAINTIFF never received a response.<BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
December 15, 2004 Plaintiff sends a complaint to Agent Sarsfield of the
Pennsylvania Attorney Generals Office in Pittsburg regarding illicit telephone
activities. The PLAINTIFF made complaints and amended the formal Verizon
Customer Relations Complaint number C-006142-2004, which was made pursuant
to the Pennsylvania Do Not Call statute. The complaint alleged that his telephone
calls were often being intercepted, misdirected, or impersonated. The PLAINTIFF
also made complaints of harassing calls from Out of the Area caller identification
that were occurring several times a day with no response after answering. The
PLAINTIFF has had endured these activities for years.
February 12th, 2005, Pamela Pflumm invited the Plaintiff for dinner after the
Plaintiffs return from a trip to Florida on the same day. Pamela Pflumm was
attending to the Plaintiffs cats and mail during his trip to Florida at his residence at
220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, Pennsylvania.<BR style="FONT-
On February 12th, after dinner, Pamela Pflumms asked the Plaintiff to drive her and
a boyfriend of Abby Pflumm to Kegels Restaurant to pick up Abby Pflumm from
work. The boyfriend of Abby Pflumm and Keagan Pflumm entered the rear seats of
the Plaintiffs car and the boyfriend held a green tennis ball in his hand and
aggressively put in the Plaintiffs face and said I found a tennis ball in your back
seat. The Plaintiff drove down the driveway and Keagan Pflumm and Abby
Pflumms boyfriend made a comment about the Plaintiffs car audio system that was
previously vandalized. The Plaintiff became upset, turned around and told Pamela
Pflumm to drive herself to pickup up Abby Pflumm from work. When the Plaintiff
arrived back home at his residence, the green tennis ball that hangs from the
Plaintiffs garage to align his parking, was suspiciously missing and was reported
stolen that night to the Southern Regional Police
Department. 265. On February 17th, 2006,
as the Plaintiff drove down Main Street, in Conestoga, while the Plaintiff noticed a
four-wheeler driving in the horse pasture of the Plfumm Property. The Plaintiff
stopped and questioned the unknown persons because it was a school night and
Pamela Pflumm was residing at the residence alone without her husband. No
member of Pflumm family was on the scene at that time. The Plaintiff did
immediately vacate the property as soon as a member of the Pflumm household
walked out of the house indicated that the persons on their property did have
permission. A few months previous to these incidents, Mr. David Pflumm separated
from his wife and was not living at the residence. The Plaintiff was called upon by
Pamela Pflumm on several occasions to help her around the house and
property. 266. On February 17, 2005, at
approximately 2:20am Officer Fedor of the Southern Regional Police Department
abruptly entered the Plaintiffs home, awakening the Plaintiff, and falsely accused
the Plaintiff of harassment for driving on the residence of David and Pamela Pflumm.
Pamela Pflumm calls the Plaintiff during the altercation with Officer Fedor on the
Plaintiffs cell phone. 267. Immateriality after the
altercation with Officer Fedor, the Plaintiff wrote a letter and sent it the Chief Fiorill
(formerly of the Lancaster City Police Bureau) of the Southern Regional Police
size=2> 268. At 1:00 pm on February
17, 2005 the Plaintiff did visit the Lancaster County District Attorneys Office and
requested to meet with District Attorney Donald Totaro. The Chief of Detectives, Mr.
Michael Landis (Former Chief of the Lancaster City Police Bureau) conducted a
meeting in a conference room where the Plaintiff complained about the conduct of
the Southern Regional Police Department and the harassment of the Officer and
clearly stated that the Plaintiff was preparing a Federal Civil Action (05-2288) and
was concerned about obstruction of justice, anit-slapp, and civil rights violations
concerning Federal Civil Action 05-2288 which was filed a few months later on May
16, 2005 in the United States District Court for the Eastern Court of
Pennsylvania. 269. On February 18,2005 the
Plaintiff did meet with the Chief of the Southern Regional Police Department, Chief
Fiorill, at the precinct located at 3284 Main Street, in Conestoga. The meeting was
initiated by request of Chief Fiorill. Officer Robert Busser (formerly of the
Pennsylvania State Police) was outside Chief Fiorills office listening to the
meeting.
270. At the
meeting of February 18th, 2005, Chief Fiorill did libel and slander the Plaintiff by
stating that I dont believe anything that you say, regarding the incidents of the
week of February 17th and the allegations contained in Federal Civil Action 05-
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 271. At the meeting of February 18th, both
Chief Fiorill and Officer Robert Busser did libel and slander the Plaintiff by stating
that the Plaintiff was nuts and questioned the Plaintiffs mental health. This
assault on the Plaintiffs mental health was done to discredit the Plaintiffs
allegations in the Federal Civil Action 05-2288.
272. At the
meeting of February 18th, Officer Fiorill disclosed that he had called the Plaintiffs
brother, Mike in Plantation Florida (who has been residing in Florida for the past 18
years), to discuss the incidents without permission, thus violating the Plaintiffs civil
rights and privacy rights. 273. At the
meeting of February 19th Officer Robert Busser threatened and assaulted the
Plaintiff by taking his nightstick and raising it up in a position to strike the Plaintiff
on the head. Chief Fiorill grabbed Officer Robert Bussers forearm just in time to stop
him from hitting the Plaintiff. 274. Both
Officer Busser and Chief Fiorill demanded the Plaintiff out of the office, thus violating
his civil rights, and placing the Plaintiff in harms way of future threats, harassment,
and numerous criminal activities.<BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
February 18th, 2005, the Plaintiff visited the establishment of the Alley Kat Bar and
Restaurant, located on Lemon Street, Lancaster, Pennsylvania from approximately
10:00pm until 11:30pm. The Plaintiff had a brief conversation with Ms. Kerry Egan
immediately before leaving to proceed directly home. 276. On February 19th, 2005, at approximately 5:00am, Officer
Fedor pounded on the Plaintiffs front door to awaken him. The Plaintiff refused to
open the door and let the Officer in due to the preceding incidents and went into his
bathroom and called the Pennsylvania State Police. The Pennsylvania State Police
refused to answer the plea for help to intervene in the altercations with the
Southern Regional Police Department. 277.
Approximately 20 minutes later, Officer Fedor and Pamela Pflumm illegally entered
into the residence of the Plaintiff by breaking and entering. 278. Officer Fedor stated he was responding to a 911 call about an
attempted suicide. The Plaintiff tried to tell Officer Fedor that he did not know what
he was talking about. Officer Fedor handcuffed the Plaintiff and was physically
abusive by pushing and shoving the Plaintiff directly in front of the Plaintiffs
loveseat and handcuffing the Plaintiff. Officer Fedor asked him why he sent an email
to Kerry Egan threatening to commit suicide. Pamela Pflumm was standing in front
of the Plaintiffs back door. The Plaintiff kept trying to tell Officer Fedor that he came
home and was sleeping all night. The Plaintiff and Officer Fedor kept arguing about
an incident that never occurred. Officer Fedor violated several civil rights of the
Plaintiff. 279. Officer Fedor stated the
Kerry Egan made a call to 911 at approximately 4:00 am and stated that she
received an email from the Plaintiff early that morning with a threat to commit
suicide. The Plaintiff called Comcast cable during the altercation to try to get an
activity list of the Plaintiffs online activities to prove that the Plaintiff did not send
any email to Kerry Egan. Officer Fedor slandered and libeled the Plaintiff by not
believing his account. The Plaintiff kept asking why Pamela Pflumm was summoned
to the Plaintiffs home and received no explanation. The Plaintiff did not see Pamela
Pflumm before that she entered the residence with Officer
Fedor. 280. It was later determined that there never
was an email, and the Southern Regional Police Department never withdrew their
allegations of mental health issues.<BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
April 5, 2006 Officer Buzzer did knowingly and willing falsely imprison Plaintiff and
maliciously attack plaintiff and accompanied several police officers in theft of a
white envelope containing approximately $743.00 in cash in a police chase from the
Conestoga Wagon Wheel Restaurant in Conestoga to Duke Street in Millersville,
Pennsylvania, via Kendig Road.<BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
April 5th, 2006, Officer Fedor did make false statements to authorities in the 302
petitions to Lancaster General Hospital and to Crisis Intervention of Lancaster,
Pennsylvania with regards to the incarceration of the Plaintiff in the Psychiatric ward
from the period of April 5th to April 10th, 2006.<BR style="FONT-
On April 5th, 2006, Officer Busser did harass, threaten, and physically abuse the
Plaintiff in the apprehension that took place on South Duke Street, Millersville,
Pennsylvania and did knowingly draw his weapon upon the Plaintiff without any
threat, merely to incite public attention to the Plaintiff that defamed his character,
and slandered his name. 284. All of
the preceding acts of retaliation by the Southern Regional Police Department were a
direct result of undo influence upon the Plaintiff and his attempts to remedy causes
of action that have been disclosed in the Federal Civil Action 05-2288, and the
Federal False Claims Act filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern
Court of Pennsylvania. <BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
April 5th, 2006, Defendants did falsely imprison Defendant at Approximately 3:15
EST at the emergency intake unit of the Lancaster General Hospital, Duke Street,
Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. 286. On April 5th,
2006, upon request, staff of the Lancaster General Hospital failed to produce any
official documentation to support the apprehension of the Plaintiff or the holding of
the Plaintiff in said facility. <BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
Defendants did open locking cell and plaintiff again asked for documentation,
plaintiff walked out of the holding cell, and not documentation was produced, agent
for defendant picked plaintiff up and literally threw plaintiff back into holding
cell. 288. Between 3:30pm and 7:15pm Dr. Riley
examined plaintiff by asking the following questions:
a. Do you
drink alcohol? b. Do you take drugs?
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">c. May I listen to your heart and drugs?

The
preceding examination took under 2 minutes and was not near sufficient for the
requirements as outlined in the 302 petition, whether legal or
not. 289. Mental Duress: Agents, employees, and
staff of the Lancaster General Hospital did engage in planned and occasional events
to inflict, cause, and provoke extreme mental duress. 290. Agents, employees, and staff did obstruct justice and cause
plaintiff to suspend, neglect, and or cease all activities relating to CA 05-0288 and
TMT 05-23059 in an overt attempt to interfere with Plaintiffs constitutional right to
due process. 291. Agents, employees, and
or staff did subject Plaintiff to a life threatening environment when patient William X
was intentionally given a ball point pen immediately after Angela X administered a
drug, and William X stood 1 foot away from Plaintiff and held ball point pen as a
knife. Plaintiff had to immediately remove himself from the immediate area.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 292. Agents, employees, and or staff
subjected Plaintiff to further harm by condoning and further provoking situation. As
of April l0th, 2006, Plaintiff is still falsely imprisoned. 293. Agents, employees, and or staff did take from Plaintiffs
possession a white bank envelope containing Seven Hundred and Forty-Three
dollars ($730.00), which was not included in Plaintiffs Possession
Form. 294. On July 23rd, 2006 PLAINTIFF speaks with
Governor Ed Rendell at a Campaign Speech at Binns Park, in Downtown Lancaster,
and requests his assistance in his Civil Rights Obstruction of Justice Complaint filed
a few weeks earlier in the Office of Attorney General. 295. On October 14th, 2006 PLAINTIFF files a RICO complaint in the
United States District Court against Shawn Long, attorney for Fulton Bank, MDJ Leo
Eckert, Commins, Simms, Case No. 4650.<BR style="FONT-
On October 17th, 2006 PLAINTIFF attends a Bail Supervision (of the Lancaster
County Sheriffs Department) Intake meeting at the Bail Administrators Office in the
Lancaster County Courthouse. PLAINTIFF serves the Lancaster County Sheriffs
Department, the Lancaster County District Attorneys Office, and the Lancaster
County Public Defenders Office Civil Actions. The Lancaster County Public Defenders
Office literally took the Certificate of Service signing sheet from PLAINTIFF and
PLAINTIFF immediately told Judge Joseph Madenspacher about the incident while he
walked to the Bus Terminal to go the Office of MDJ Commins. The document was
never returned even after several emails to the contrary by the Public Defender, Mr.
Karl. 297. On October 20th, 2006 PLAINTIFF files a
Federal False Claims Act for Whistle-Blowing against ISC in the United States District
Court For The Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Case No. 06-
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 298. On October 26th, 2006 The Pennsylvania
Superior Court received a Brief for the Appeal Challenging the Fulton Bank Judgment
of June 29, 2006. 299. October 30th, 2006 The
Pennsylvania Superior Court sends a letter to PLAINTIFF requesting (7) more copies
of the brief, which PLAINTIFF will not receive until January 4th, 2007. An amended
complaint to PLAINTIFFs Southern Regional Police Department Civil Action, Case No.
06-3401, is due in the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County on exactly this
date. An Unsecured Bail Bond was revoked by Officer Adam Cramer of the Southern
Regional Police Department and (2) Bench Warrants were issued for the Arrest of
PLAINTIFF by Adam Cramer of the Southern Regional Police Department and MDJ
Leo Eckert, Jr.. PLAINTIFF filed the Amended Complaint and mailed it from the
Bausman Post Office Substation, and did not go to the Lancaster County Courthouse
in fear it would not get filed. At 2:20pm (2) PA Constable arrest and apprehend the
PLAINTIFF at 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA, and take him to Magisterial
District Justice Eckerts Office on the (5) Bench warrants for summary citations and
then COMMITT The PLAINTIFF to the Lancaster County Prison, stating that an
Indigent Hearing will be held within 10 days, and challenges the PLAINTIFFS
Indigent status and his Superior Court Cases. Magisterial District Justice Eckert
complains to the PLAINTIFF about being named a Defendant in Federal Case No. 06-
4650, and remarks that the PLAINTIFF may have to be taken to Dauphin County
Prison for suing all of the District Justices in Lancaster County. He also said You are
not even close to getting to the Superior Court. 300. On November 1st, 2006 PLAINTIFF appears before Judge Paul
K. Allison who reinstates his Bail Bond as Secured, which required PLAINTIFF to post
$5,000 to get out of the Lancaster County Prison instead of just signing an
Unsecured Bail Bond, which should have happened, and is not released from the
Lancaster County Prison, as expected. <BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
November 6th, 2006 PLAINTIFF files his first Appeal for Reconsideration to the
ORDER of Judge Paul K. Allison to Reinstate the Bail Bond as Unsecured, and Release
him from Lancaster County Prison. November 20th,
2006 The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
records 28 U. S. C. 2241 Habeas Corpus Petition Case No. 06-5138 (Challenging the
Detainer and Imprisonment) filed from the Lancaster County Prison on November
14th, 2006. This case is still 303. On November 8th, 2006
PLAINTIFF is transported to Magisterial District Justice Leo H. Eckert, Jr., and signs a
document that was missed on October 30th, 2006, and is not given an Indigent
Hearing as promised. 304. On December 2nd, 2006
PLAINTIFF files an Appeal to Judge Paul K. Allison ORDER of November 30th,
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 305. On December 4th, 2006 the Lancaster
County Sheriffs Department is ORDERED to transport PLAINTIFF to both residences,
1250 Fremont Street, and 220 Stone Hill Road to obtain files and evidence for a
Trial, as a Pro Se Litigant and representing himself on the East Lampeter Township
summary citations. There were no Sheriff Sale Posting on 220 Stone Hill Road, and
both residences look fine.<BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
December 5th, 2006 The Lancaster Intelligencer Journal publishes the Story The
Next Sound You Hear regarding former business partner Tony Bongiovi, which is
central to all of the litigation in the United States District Courts. The worlds of pro
audio and consumer electronics were bridged at New York City's Avatar Studios in
December, where Bongiovi Acoustics unveiled the Digital Power Station car radio.
Demonstrated by audio icon Tony Bongiovi (pictured) in Avatars Studio A (former
Power Station Studios), the patent-pending technology being manufactured by JVC
made a very impressive debut.<BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
December 6th, 2006 Honda Financial repossess a Honda Odyssey stored at the St.
Dennis Towing Companys facility from August 31, 2006; the Honda was take
because of the illegal repossession of the drivers license and there were no funds
available for the tow that was just a few blocks away. The Honda was protected
under the pending Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Petition and was conveniently taken
while incarcerated. The PLAINTIFF had talked to Honda Financial in August and there
was no problem with the lease, even though the PLAINTIFF had not made a
payment since May of 2005. The St. Dennis Towing Company was charging $25.00
per day, and has never filed or sent the PLAINTIFF an invoice for the storage, which
is very suspect. 308. On December 8th, 2006
PLAINTIFF files a Writ of Mandamus against Magisterial District Justice Leo H. Eckert,
Jr, and Mary Commins for the fraudulent activities leading to the false imprisonment
of October 30th, 2006, and Bench Warrants.<BR style="FONT-
On December 12th, 2006 PLAINTIFF files for Continuances in all of the following Civil
Complaints in the Commonwealth Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County,
Pennsylvania: CI-06-07330; CI-06-08742; CI-06-08490; CI-06-07376; CI-06-07188;
CI-06-06658; CI-06-04939; CI-06-03403; CI-06-03401; CI-06-03349.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 310. On December 13th, 2006 The Lancaster
County Sheriffs Department (Maluskus) and Chief John Fiorill tried to get PLAINTIFF
to change his address to the Lancaster County Prison and Judge Perezous refused to
get ORDER PLAINTIFF to comply with the demand and Judge Perezous CONTINUED
the Appeal Hearing because PLAINTIFF did not have any files to conduct a
Trial. 311. On December 20th, 2006 The Lancaster
County Sheriffs Department (Hiem & N/A-names given by Sheriff Simone)
refused PLAINTIFF to wear his suit into the courtroom, or take his files into the Pre-
Trial Conference before Judge Farina, which caused PLAINTIFF to forget to discuss
material motions for the Trial, and caused the PLAINTIFF to be defamed by
appearing in a Lancaster County Prison uniform before the Court and in front of 20
or so other people in the Courtroom.<BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
December 20th, 2006, while in the Lancaster County Prison, the Lancaster County
Sheriffs Department and Fulton Bank conduct a Sheriff Sale for 220 Stone Hill Road,
Foreclosure CI-06-02271, with NO notification before or after the SALE to PLAINTIFF;
and sold the property to Central Penn Settlement Company of Akron,
Pennsylvania. 313. On December 28th, 2006
Judge Paul K. Allison overturned his previous ORDER and Granted PLAINTIFF his
Appeal ORDER and signed the Unsecured Bail ORDER and the RELEASE from
Lancaster County Prison.<BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
December 29th, 2006 PLAINTIFF is RELEASED from Lancaster County Prison, and
walks to the Lancaster County Courthouse to report to Court Administration and the
Prothonotary Office to get a print out of all of the Civil Dockets for all cases in Civil
Court, including the Fulton Bank Foreclosure and finds out for the first time that the
Sheriff Sale on December 20th took place. PLAINTIFF retrieves a check for $19.34
from Attillio Grossi, which is all the funds has available for food, and all other
necessities. 315. On January 2, 2007
PLAINTIFF files and records (4:09pm) a Petition To Set Aside Sale for 220 Stone Hill
Road, Conestoga in the Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County
and personally serves Fulton Bank and the Lancaster County Sheriffs
size=2> 316. January 4th, 2007 At
1:15pm PLAINTIFF visits 220 Stone Hill Road and finds 2 unidentified individuals on
his property loading the entire contents of 220 Stone Hill Road onto 2 Penske
moving trucks, to an unidentified location, and is ordered off the Property for
Trespassing. The 2 individuals said they were from Noble Real Estate Company. Mr.
Joseph Caterbone accompanied him as a witness and driver. PLAINTIFF takes several
pictures of the individuals and the Penske Trucks. At 1:35pm PLAINTIFF retrieves his
mail from the Conestoga Post Office from dating back to October 25th, 2006 up to
the present and temporarily forwards mail to 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA.
PLAINTIFF visits the Lancaster County Sheriffs Office and speaks to Lt. Lancaster
and Mr. Bergman about the incident at 220 Stone Hill Road and is told that Southern
Regional Police have already responded, and would not give any information about
the incident. At 3:00pm PLAINTIFF attends the Trial for Criminal Case No. CP-36-CR-
0003179-2006 (Fleeing & Eluding filed by Sgt. Busser of Southern Regional
Police Department on April 5th, 2006) in Courtroom 1 of the Lancaster County
Courthouse and moves for a Motion for a Continuance due to the incident at the
property at 220 Stone Hill Road an hour before. The Honorable Judge James P. Cullen
Denies his Motion. 317. On January 5th, 2007 At
8:30am PLAINTIFF files and records an Addendum to the Petition To Set Aside Sale
for 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga in the Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas of
Lancaster County and personally serves Fulton Bank and the Lancaster County
Sheriffs Department regarding the theft of all of his personal possessions, including
business files of Advanced Media Group, and all Legal files and evidentiary assets
for all pending litigation. At 9:00 am the Lancaster County District Attorney Deborah
Muzereus moves for A Continuance in the Trial for Criminal Case No. CP-36-CR-
0003179-2006 and the Honorable James P. Cullen Grants a Continuance until the
February Trial Schedule.<BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
January 7th , 2007 PLAINTIFF files a claim with Harleysville Insurance Homeowners
Policy HOAI 93468 for the theft of his personal possessions and the property at
Stone Hill Road. PLAINTIFF files for a Change of Venue for the Hearing scheduled for
January 18th, 2007 in Intercourse before Magisterial District Justice Leo H. Eckert, Jr..
PLAINTIFF does not have all of his evidentiary files and no transportation because of
the illegal revocation of his Red Rose Transit Authority Monthly Bus
Pass. 319. On January 8th, 2007 PLAINTIFF files an
Emergency Petition for Food Stamps and other in the Pennsylvania Court of
Common Pleas of Lancaster after his Food Stamps and Red Rose Transit Authority
Monthly Pass was illegally terminated, thus leaving him without food and
transportation for all court preceding. PLAINTIFF files for a Continuance for
Summary charges by District Justice Leo H. Eckert Jr., a Defendant in U.S. District
Civil Action 06-4650, scheduled for January 18th, 2007., again for not having access
to all of his evidentiary files and without transportation. PLAINTIFF files and sends
his Brief to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case No. 1463 MDA 2006 for the
challenge to Fulton Banks 220 Stone Hill Road Foreclosure, via U.S. Postal Priority
Mail Return Receipt No. 0306 2400 003 1072 4451; the request stated: Other - We
need 7 copies of this brief, also all copies need to be bound on the left like a book
and if you use staples they must be covered with tape. PLAINTIFF borrows $50.00
from Joseph Caterbone for food, paper, and postage for the Superior Court
Brief. 320. On January 9th, 2007 PLAINTIFF files for
Continuance in all of his pending Civil Actions before the United States District
Courts for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; 05-2288; 06-4650; 06-5138; 06-
4734; 06-CV-4154; 06-5117; 06-2236; 05-23059BKY. PLAINTIFF files for a Change of
Venue and Continuance for Summary Citations (TR-0008735-2006; TR-0008578-
2006; TR-0008721-2006; TR-0008503-2006; TR-0007528-2006) Scheduled for a
Hearing on January 23, 2007 before District Magistrate Richard H. Simms, a
Defendant in U.S. District Civil Action 06-4650. PLAINTIFF receives a Notice to
Change the Hearing Scheduled for January 18th, 2007 from Magisterial District
Justice Leo H. Eckert, Jr. to Isaac Stoltzfus of Intercourse. PLAINTIFF Petitions the
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County to vacate the Bail
Supervision Ordered by Magisterial District Justice Mary Commins on October 10th,
2006. The Bail Supervision was without merit or cause. 321. January 10th, 2007 PLAINTIFF reports a theft of the Digital
Recorder used containing an authentic and original audio recording of the incident
for the Case No. CP-36-CR-0003179-2006 (Fleeing & Eluding filed by Sgt.
Busser of Southern Regional Police Department on April 5th, 2006) to Officer Cole of
the Lancaster City Police Department who responded at approximately 10:25pm to
1250 Fremont Street and filed the incident as Case No. 0701-
014878. 322. January 11th, 2007 The
Honorable Judge James P. Cullen Orders PLAINTIFFs Petition to vacate the Bail
Supervision as Denied Case No. 4771-2006. PLAINTIFF writes the following in an
email to the Red Rose Transit Authority: I am having a problem with my monthly
passes. I have not received my January Monthly Pass, and my forwarded mail has
not been received from 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga. Today, your driver Dave on
the 3 8th Ward/Park City 8:35 bus made me pay him for the fare. Some drivers let
me on with my December Pass and my Letter of Acceptance from September of
2006. I never received a termination letter, and on January 5th, filed an Emergency
Petition against the Lancaster County Assistance Office to have all benefits that
have been terminated, reinstated. What is the status of my Monthly Pass? Below is
an excerpt from the Civil Action, Case No. CI-07-00150 in the Court of Common
Pleas of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. The Petitioner has not received his January
Red Rose Transit Authority January Monthly Bus Pass, sponsored by the RRTA and
the Lancaster County Assistance Office. The Petitioner did receive his December
Monthly Bus Pass, and complained to the Red Rose Transit Authority Terminal
Station on Queen Street, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, on January 5th,2007. The staff
worker told the Petitioner that his Monthly Pass was deleted because he was
incarcerated. The Petitioner explained that the Red Rose Transit Authority Monthly
Bus Pass was issued for a (2) year period. The incarceration was not valid and I was
released upon the Success of my Appeal, which was signed by the Honorable Judge
Paul K. Allison on December 28th, 2007. The PLAINTIFF, in the Pre-Trial Conference
moves for a Continuance for 0004771-2006 before Judge Ashworth and it is
GRANTED. 323. January 12th, 2007
PLAINTIFF receives the following email from Ms. Gail Parenteau, of Bongiovi
Acoustics: What is Advanced Media Group? It is our policy not to open unsolicited
attachments. What's your tel. no. I've been with Tony since 1986 and neither of us
remembers what this is. I've highlighted your type-os in red below. PLAINTIFF
responds with the following email to Ms. Gail Parenteau: I (Financial Management
Group, Ltd.,) was at Power Station from February until July in 1987 working
extensively with Tony, Ellen, and all of the Producers from Flatbush Films in
Hollywood. Tony named me Executive Producer of the project, and that is in the
budgets. Now, are you really associated with Tony, or are you covering for
someone? I have still photos, audio recorded meetings with Bob Walters (Co-Owner
of Power Station Studios), business plans for "Mutant Mania", Tony's Digital Movie,
with budgets, screenplays, joint venture agreements, Patent and Copyright
materials for Power Station Studios and Tony. I also have documents for the Pier in
Wildwood, which Tony owned. I personally authored many of these materials with
Tony, at his request. I spent many days and nights working at Power Station on this
project. I had a Navajo Chieftain twin turbo prop that I flew to Power Station for
some of my meetings, the other times me and Scott Robertson drove. I even have
another management consulting proposal that I developed for Tony in 1989, when
he wanted me to restructure Power Station from top to bottom. If, you were not
privy to these projects, then maybe you should at least talk to Tony. I was just
providing a professional courtesy to Tony, especially, since I have admitted many
documents pertaining to my claims in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Tony is not a Defendant in my claims. I have
authored a Joint Venture Proposal for Sony, which details the Power Station Digital
Music System, and I have noticed what Tony is doing. I will not call, for security
reasons, I cannot tell who is on the other end. You can have a legal representative
or Tony forward correspondence to: PLAINTIFF, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
17603. 324. January 13th, 2007
PLAINTIFF visits the Red Rose Transit Authority Terminal at Queen Street again
attempting to get his January Monthly Bus Pass, which he thinks is missing in the
mail. PLAINTIFF borrows $20.00 from Richard Hobday, for food, postage, and paper;
and ride home from the Lancaster County Courthouse. PLAINTIFF receives a letter
and a Distribution Schedule from the Lancaster County Sheriffs Office that states:
On December 20,2007 your property located at 220 Stone Hill Rd. was sold at
Sheriff Sale to a third party buyer, Central Penn Property Services, Inc. for
$156,000.00. Attached, you will find a Schedule of Distribution, which we are
required to do. On this schedule you will see that there is a balance of proceeds to
be paid to you, Stanley J. Caterbone. You, the defendant, will receive this balance of
$17,306.80, however, you have served Sheriff Bergman with a petition to set aside
the sale (PARCP 3132). Please note that we, the Sheriffs Office, do not have a dated
and signed copy by the court of your petition. At the advice of our solicitor, the
distribution of any payouts regarding this property will not be made until the matter
is resolved. Fulton Bank and the Lancaster County Sheriffs Department embezzle
over $50,000 in Fees, Costs, and the Distribution of Sale associated with the Sale
Proceeds of 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA. The Praecipe-Writ of Execution filed
on July 31sth, 2006 by Fulton Bank for Foreclosure Case No. CI-06-02271 stated:
FILED. WRIT ISSUED. AFFIDAVIT OF NON-MILITARY SERVICE. PRINCIPAL: $88,568.53;
INTEREST TO 03/02/2006 AT A RATE OF $14.56 PER DIEM: $4,442.96; NEGATIVE
ESCROW BALANCE: $1,096.38; LATE CHARGES: $317.20; ATTORNEYS' FEES:
$3,000.00; TOTAL: $97,425.07. FILED BY SHAWN M. LONG, ESQ. PLAINTIFF receives
a letter from the Superior Court of Pennsylvania regarding the Fulton Bank
Foreclosure Challenge, notifying him that AND NOW, this fourth day of January,
2007 the appeal in this matter is DISMISSED for failure to file a brief. This
DISMISSAL is highly suspect considering that the Superior Court placed no time
conditions on receiving the additional (7) Copies and it was received several days
AFTER PLAINTIFF had already mailed the required (7) Copies and fulfilled the
obligations to the Superior Court, thus furthering the fact that Fulton Bank and the
Sheriffs Office of Lancaster County held an illegal sale on December 20th, 2006.
PLAINTIFF receives DENIED on an ORDER from Change of Venue and Continuance
for the Hearings for January 18th, 2007, signed by Judge Dennis Reinaker of the
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County,
Pennsylvania. 325. Fulton Bank Tommy, 1991 Check Error 2005 Fulton Bank Project Hope Freeze Account, Gift Certificate,
false arrests, Scouts Trail Count IV - extortion, Slander, Libel 2006 False Arrests, Comcast Cable, 4650, False Imprisonment,
Civil Rights Complaint, 2007
Computer Hacking, Lancaster City Police, Human Relations Complaint, Judge
Cullen 
THIRD CIRCUIT BRIEF
<DIV style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">

<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: center">UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD
CIRCUIT STANLEY J.
CATERBONE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP APPELLANTS v. LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON, et al. APPELLEE CASE NO. 07-4474 (E.D. Pa. Civ. No. 05-cv-
2288) BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF APPEAL PER ORDER DATED MAY 27,
2008 </DIV></DIV>
<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify"> AND NOW, on this 1st day of July 2008, Stanley J. Caterbone and
Advanced Media Group, APPELLANTS, do hereby file this Brief in Support of Appeal
in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals as ORDERED in the BRIEFING AND SCHEDULING
OREDER of May 27, 2008. APPELLANTS respectfully avers as follows: APPELLANT,
Stanley J. Caterbone, resides at 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA, 17603, is a
United States Citizen and Advanced Media Group is a fictitious name registered in
Pennsylvania with its principal place of business in
Pennsylvania. </DIV>
Verdana">Date: July 1, 2008 Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Advanced Media Group 1250 Fremont
Street Lancaster, PA 17603 amgroup01@msn.com http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/ TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page
3 2. JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT Page
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">2.(a) STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES Page
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">2.(b) STATEMENT OF REVIEW Page
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">3. STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES FOR REVIEW Page
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">4. STATEMENT OF THE CASE Page
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">5. STATEMENT OF THE FACTS Page
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">6. SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENTS Page
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">7. ARGUMENTS Page 16 8. CONCLUSION Page 19 9. CERTIFICATE OF
SERVICE Page 21 10. APPENDIX Page
22 1. TABLE OF AUTHORITIES 1. Amendment XIV to the Constitution of the United
States 2. Caterbone v. Lancaster County
Prison, et. Al., U.S. District Case No. 05-2288 3.
Donnelly v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 677 F.2d 339, 342 (3d
Cir.1982) 4. Poulis v. State Farm Fire &
Cas. Co., 747 F.2d 863 (3d Cir. 1984) 5. Zucker v.
Westinghouse, 374 F.3d 221, 227 (3d Cir. 2004) 2. JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT This
appeal was filed under FRAP 4. (a) (1) (A) and is of a final order that disposes all
parties of all claims. The notice of appeal was filed on November 19, 2008 and was
recorded on November 23, 2008, one day after the 30th day. November 22, 2008,
being a legal holiday, Thanksgiving, was not the last day to record the appeal as a
timely appeal according to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. This issue is
cured in the Response to the Letter of Jurisdiction filed by CATERBONE and is a
timely appeal. The district court had jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.A. 43, Chapter 96 of
Title 18 of the United States Code, 18 U.S.C. 1961 through 18 U.S.C. 1968, and
15 U.S.C. Anti-Trust Act. The "Federal Civil Rights Statute" (Rev Stat 1979, 8 U.S.C.A. 43, 2 FCA
title 8, 43) provides: "Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance,
regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory, subjects, or causes to be
subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction
thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the
Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in
equity, or other proper proceeding for redress." 2. (a)
STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES On May 23, 2005
(one week after this case, 05-2288) CATERBONE filed a Petition for Chapter 11
Reorganization Case No. 05-23059 in U.S. Bankruptcy Court. This case 06-cv-3955 in
the Third Circuit on August 25, 2006. The following district court cases: 06-cv-4650;
and 06-cv-5138 (Habeas Corpus); and 06-cv-4734. 06-cv-4734 was the beginning of
a federal false claims act filed under duress filed on October 20, 2006. The case
contained no complaint, was never served on anyone, nor was never amended.
CATERBONE was falsely imprisoned weeks after both 06-cv-4650 and 06-cv-4734
were filed. Habeas Corpus 06-cv-5138 was filed on November 11, 2006 by
CATERBONE appearing pro se while falsely imprisoned in the Lancaster County
Prison on October 30, 2006 until December 29, 2006. Three cases were received by
the U.S. District Court on June 10, 2008 and are awaiting forms to be docketed:
CATERBONE v. County of Lancaster, et. al.,; CATERBONE v. Lancaster City Bureau of
Police, et. al.,; CATERBONE v. PENNDOT, et. al., 2.(b)
STATEMENT OF REVIEW The district court
had abused its discretion and erred in the DISMISSAL of this case with prejudice.
The merits analysis was not applied and the district court completely ignored all
motions that contained factual information as to why CATERBONE could not comply
with the time specified ORDER to amend the complaint, which was the reason
CATERBONE had continued to file motions for extension of time. At the same time
CATERBONE had made every attempt to notify and complain to law enforcement
and oversight authorities in order to stop the activities, which made it impossible to
amend the complaint by the district courts specified time period. The motions
included several incidents of abuse of process (ignoring complaints and not
investigating), violations of the Federal Torts Claim Act regarding obstruction of due
process and obstruction of justice that contributed to CATERBONE not being able to
file an amended complaint in the time specified by the district
court. 3. STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES FOR REVIEW 1. Did the District Court Abuse Its Discretion in its DISMISSAL on
October 22, 2007 by not taking into consideration: that the APPELLANT
(CATERBONE) was appearing pro se with liberal construction; all of the abuses and
civil rights violations that the APPELLANT has brought to the District Courts
attention in previous motions and pleadings; and that CATERBONE did not have a
clear record of delay or contumacious conduct?<A class=RE
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; COLOR: rgb(0,0,255); FONT-FAMILY: Verdana;
BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255)"
target=_blank>timely and complete Amended Complaint? (Click Here)</A> 2. Did the District Court err in dismissing the case without addressing the
factors set forth in the merits analysis in Poulis v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.,
747 F.2d 863 (3d Cir. 1984)? 4. STATEMENT OF THE
CASE This is a complex civil rights and anti-trust case
containing elements of a civil conspiracy and RICO violations culminating from a
Federal False Claims Act complaint from 1987. Due to the mass array of violations,
CATERBONE was only able to alert local, state, and federal authorities of the abuse
and fraud within International Signal & Control (ISC) back in 1987, but never
was afforded due process to file the actual Federal False Claims Act complaint and
the other civil complaints that are contained in this case. ISC and its employees,
including founder and CEO James Guerin were indicted in 1991 for a host of crimes
including a $Billion Dollar fraud and export violations including selling cluster bombs
to South Africa, which ultimately were sold to Iraq and used during the Persian Gulf
War. Guerin and others plead guilty in 1992 and were sentenced accordingly. Guerin
spent 14 years in a federal prison for his crimes, as did others.
 This case contains
abuse of process (ignoring complaints and not investigating), violations of the
Federal Torts Claim Act, and other violations such as false arrests, false
imprisonment, and a fabricated mental health record that has occurred from 1987
until today that have made the cover-up of these violations and crimes possible.
The defendants and other interested parties and persons used these malicious civil
violations and civil torts to discredit all and any allegations of misconduct and
wrongdoing and to slander and libel CATERBONE and his companies to the general
public-at-large. CATERBONES companies, namely Advanced Media Group, also fell
victim as the perpetrators attempted to rewrite history and the record. In addition
this case contains fraud, extortion, loss of time, loss of opportunity, and loss of
income that have made the journey of justice and remedy for these actions almost
impossible to litigate. There is also a criminal element and public corruption element that has
followed CATERBONE and this case, however the abuse of process (ignoring
complaints and not investigating), and the violations of the Federal Torts Claim Act
coupled with the misconduct of public officials has kept the perpetrators and
defendants safe, for the time being. Judicial misconduct and abuse of discretion
runs rampant in all of CATERBONES cases. The abuse of process (ignoring
complaints and not investigating), and violations of the Federal Torts Claim Act
continues to provide motive and security to those that harm, damage, and injure
CATERBONE. There is a vast array of mail fraud and misconduct in the offices of the
clerks of the respective courts that have helped to confuse the record and interrupt
this litigation. Court filings, notices, and ORDERS are constantly kept from reaching
CATERBONE causing a record of missed hearings and late filings. Computer intrusion
and hacking is used to confuse and manipulate the filings that are submitted.
CATERBONE has been challenged with the task of verifying or confirming the
authenticity of research materials and court related materials in the course of this
litigation. This case involves civil torts and abuse of process (ignoring complaints
and not investigating) that address these issues. Violations of the Federal Torts
Claim Act will be addressed in future litigation or will be included in the Amended
Complaint. The theft
of intellectual property and invasion of privacy is constant to keep CATERBONE from
performing and executing his litigation strategy in full optimal performance, without
the security necessary to protect and preserve the record of these crimes and
violations. CATERBONEs expertise in computer technology and information
technology is often challenged when preserving the record. This case also addresses
those issues. On May 16, 2008 CATERBONE filed the complaints in this case under
duress, and merely submitted to the courts a document that contained finding of
facts in chronological order. The Honorable Mary A. McLaughlin found numerous
meritorious claims in her ORDER and MEMORANDUM of June 13, 2006 contained in
the complaint and used a merits analysis. CATERBONE was then instructed to file an
amended complaint, which he requested to the district court in filings soon after the
original complaint was filed. The DEFENDANTS have filed numerous motions for
dismissal throughout this case. Most of the causes of actions were time barred and
exceeded the statute of limitations. CATERBONE was never able to file an amended
complaint until September 15, 2007 and addressed the issues of the statute of
limitations in order to cure that deficiency in this case, although admitting that the
amended complaint did not completely contain all of the causes of actions and
complaints in this case. The obstruction of due process and other violations and
actions have precluded CATERBONE from submitting an amended complaint
according to the rules of procedure, which contained all of the causes of actions, in
the time specified period mandated by the district court. There needs to be special
consideration and discussion of the special status rules and doctrines of pro se
litigants and how it applies to CATERBONE and this case. As a general rule, every
federal court in the United States affords pro se civil litigants special status ,
although courts often differ on the way they describe that status. This general rule
is followed, to varying degrees, by state courts. </DIV>
Verdana"> </DIV>
Verdana">There is a covert objective by the County of Lancaster, the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and other principals, stakeholders, and defendants
of this complaint to manipulate CATERBONE into the revocation of his special status
rights as a pro se litigant in Federal Courts through the abuse standard of the
doctrine by forcing CATERBONE to litigate for every constitutional right, the right of
protection by law enforcement, the payment for services, and other considerations
that CATERBONE is entitled to receive. Loosing special status would result in the
dismissal of all of CATERBONEs federal complaints. This would also allow no
oversight and justice to the multitude of abuses of discretion and errors that have
occurred at the state court level, and provide no due access for all of the
meritorious claims that have been illegally dismissed in the Lancaster County Court
of Common Pleas, and the Pennsylvania Appellate courts. It is the perfect strategy,
and the only strategy that is available to since keeping highly qualified attorneys
from representing CATERBONE failed when CATERBONE filed pro se in 2005 in the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and in the
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. For 18 years the strategy of keeping
attorneys from representing CATERBONE has been successful in keeping these
complaints from the courts. However, when CATERBONE appeared pro se, that
strategy was mooted. </DIV>
Verdana">In reviewing at the abusiveness rationale used for the revocation of the
special status afforded to pro se litigants the courts have deemed that any pro se
litigant with 12 or more complaints in any given year warrant sanction and the
revocation of the special status. The first and most important loss to CATERBONE
would be loosing the liberal construction of complaints, pleadings, and briefs when
litigating in the federal courts. There are other benefits of the special status that
would be lost : (1) a right to have ones complaint treated as amended by ones
papers in opposition to a defendants motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim;
(2) a right to file an amended complaint, including a second amended complaint; (3)
a right to be specifically notified of the consequences of failing to respond to a
summary judgment motion before being subjected to those consequences; (4) a
right to be excused from complying with service deadlines, discovery deadlines,
motion-filing deadlines, and page limits; and (5) a right to be presumed to have
been acting in good faith when sanctions are being contemplated. The rationale for
conferring this special status is that pro se litigants need help since they are often
inexperienced or unfamiliar with legal procedures or terminology.
Verdana">The special status needs to be preserved for CATERBONE, who has never
used a ghostwriter or any other person in the formulation, preparation, writing, or
filing of any court documents.</DIV>
Verdana">This court should use the rule of law and administer justice to right this
21-year odyssey of wrongs, damages, financial losses, pain and suffering, loss of
opportunities, and loss of family and society that has been subjected to CATERBONE
and move this case forward with all of the authority and discretion bestowed upon
it. 5. STATEMENT OF FACTS On or about May
16, 2005, Plaintiff-Appellant, Stanley J. Caterbone ("CATERBONE") filed a pro se
Complaint against Fulton Bank ("Fulton"); Mellon (Commonwealth) Bank; Southern
Regional Police Department; Avalon Police Department; Stone Harbor Police
Department; and the Lancaster County Sheriffs Department in the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. On the same day CATERBONE filed a
Motion to Seal the Complaint for 2 reasons; National Security Concerns and the
attempt on CATERBONES life that happened in July of 1991; after the ABC News
Nightline broadcast of International Signal & Control (ISC) and the Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA) selling cluster bombs and other weaponry to South Africa
through to Iraq . On or about December 17, 2005, CATERBONE sent a letter to the district
court requesting leave to Amend the Complaint and a hearing. No Defendants have
been served to this point. By ORDER dated January 5, 2006, the district court directed
CATERBONE to serve Defendants with the Summons and Complaint by January 25,
2006 or face dismissal of the Complaint without prejudice. Fulton Bank filed a Motion to Dismiss
the Complaint and a brief in support of the Motion to Dismiss on February 9, 2006.
Motions to Dismiss were also filed on behalf of Manheim Township Police
Department, Commonwealth National Bank (i.e. Mellon Bank) and the Lancaster
County Prison. On or about June 2, 2006, while the Motions to Dismiss were still pending,
CATERBONE filed a MOTION requesting an ex parte meeting with the Honorable
Mary A McLaughlin "to discuss the problems of preceding this action without
obstruction of justice, retaliation, and intimidation; and to amend the original
complaint as discussed previously." Fulton Bank filed a Response in opposition to the Motion for an Ex
Parte Meeting on June 5, 2006. CATERBONE hand-delivered a Reply to counsel for
Fulton on June 12, 2006. On the same day, the district court issued an ORDER
granting the Motions to Dismiss. The district court's order dismissed the Complaint
as to all Defendants on the basis of improper service and the expiration of the
statute of limitations. The court's order also denied the Motion for an Ex Parte
Meeting with the Court as moot. On June 13, 2006 the Honorable Judge Mary McLaughlin signed a
MEMORANDUM and ORDER. The MEMORANDUM used the merits analysis and found
more than 15 meritorious claims against the DEFENDANTS, and ORDERED the
motions to dismiss the complaints against Mellon Bank, Manheim Township Police
Department and Fulton Bank are GRANTED for exceeding the statute of limitations.
It is further ordered that the plff's (CATERBONES) Complaint is also dismissed as to
defts (defendants) Southern Regional Police Department, Stone Harbor Police
Department, Avalon Police Dept, Lancaster County Prison and Lancaster County
Sheriff's Department For the reasons stated in the memorandum of Today's date.
Further ordered that the plff's (CATERBONES) motion For an ex parte meeting with
the court is denied as Moot. Signed by judge Mary A.
Mclaughlin. On June 14, 2006 CATERBONE filed a REPLY to FUTLON BANKS RESPONSE
to CATERBONES Motion for an Ex Parte Meeting and argued the following:
PLAINTIFF (CATERBONE) filed the original complaint on May 16, 2005 prematurely
due to the undo influence and intimidation of several DEFENDANTS and other
persons, entities, and or organizations; specifically the threat of a fabricated
criminal prosecution. PLAINTIFF readily recognized the deficiencies in the filing and
the lack of a formal complaint (affidavit and finding of facts only), and had
repeatedly requested information and procedural guidance from the Court during
the course of time that had elapsed until the ORDER of the Honor on January 7,
2006. This had seemed especially difficult in light of the fact that the original filing
was sealed. In 1998 PLAINTIFF stated to the courts the following: I conclude that
the courts must provide me with fair access to the law, and most certainly, the
process must void any technical deficiencies found in this filing as being material to
the conclusions. Such arrogance by the Courts would only challenge the judicial
integrity of our Constitution. PLAINTIFF (CATERBONE) acknowledges that the
preceding statement contains an emotional response to the situation, and readily
requests that the Court interprets the legal intention and merits of the PLAINTIFFs
request for a fair and reasonable access to the Court to hear and adjudicate the
PLAINTIFFs complaint. PLAINTIFF has filed numerous formal complaints with the Federal Bureau
of Investigations Internet Crime Complaint Center. Those complaints identified as;
I05120608348825 ; I05120804514805; and I06010506177009. Additionally
complaints were filed with the Southern Regional Police Department of Conestoga,
and the Lancaster County District Attorneys Office with Chief Detective Michael J.
Landis, during the course of the last 2 years, where the PLAINTIFFS computer and
online broadband connections was hacked. At times when PLAINTIFF attempted to
search and find Rules of Civil Procedure (Federal and Pennsylvania) and related
subject matters, including but not limited to the effective service for DEFENDANTS,
certain provisions were missing and or replaced with erroneous and misinformation,
thus resulting in an improper Certificate of Service and violation of the Rules of Civil
Procedure relating to the Service of the complaint. On June 19,2006, the district court
issued another ORDER regarding CATERBONE's Motion for an Ex Parte Meeting
which stated in pertinent part: [T]o the extent that the plaintiff is requesting leave
to file an amended complaint: 1) the request
shall be deemed a motion to file an amended complaint; and 2) the motion is GRANTED. Although the
Court DISMISSED many of the claims in the original complaint as time-barred, and
the plaintiff has not attached a proposed amended complaint to demonstrate that
he will be able to cure the deficiencies in the original complaint, the plaintiff is
entitled to amend his pleadings once as a matter of course before a responsive
pleading is served. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a); Shane v. Fauver, 213 F.3d 113, 115 (3d Cir.
2000). No responsive pleading has yet been filed in this
case. The
district court did not, however, set forth a deadline, or did not specify a period of
time by which CATERBONE was to file an Amended Complaint.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">Accordingly, Fulton Bank filed a Motion to Establish a
Deadline for CATERBONE to File an Amended Complaint, which was granted on July
20, 2006. In its order, the district court directed CATERBONE to file an Amended
Complaint by August 20, 2006 and warned that if he failed to do so, the lawsuit
would be dismissed with prejudice. FULTON BANK was intimidating CATERBONE and
using its influence in the City of Lancaster and the County of Lancaster in deterring
and thwarting CATERBONES due access to the courts. See civil actions CATERBONE
v. City of Lancaster, et. al., and CATERBONE v. The County of Lancaster, et., al., filed
on June 10, 2008 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
Verdana">On or about
August 21, 2006, CATERBONE filed a Response to Fulton Bank's Motion to Establish
a Deadline for Plaintiff to File an Amended Complaint. In his nine (9) page
typewritten Response to Fulton Bank's Motion, CATERBONE asked the district court
to grant him an "unspecified date" to comply with the court's order and file his
Amended Complaint. CATERBONE cited several criminal citations recently issued
against him (most of which have been dismissed and are contained in CATERBONE
v. County of Lancaster District Attorney Office as false arrest complaints, the
remaining few still under appeal in state courts); his on-going problems with his
electrical provider and the illegal termination of his electricity in his home office; the
time he had to spend in criminal courts appearing pro se, or vexatious litigation;
and other civil lawsuits and complaints filed by him as the reason for the requested
unspecified time period to amend this complaint. By ORDER dated August 23, 2006,
the district court GRANTED in part and DENIED in part CATERBONE's request for an
"unspecified date" by which to amend his Complaint. The district court's order gave
CATERBONE until September 6, 2006 to file an Amended Complaint or the case was
to be dismissed, with prejudice. Instead of filing an amended complaint, on September 6, 2006
CATERBONE filed a Notice of Appeal of the district court's ORDER directing him to
file an Amended Complaint by September 6, 2006. Accompanying the Notice of
Appeal was a twenty (20) page brief in support of his appeal. In the brief
accompanying his Notice of Appeal, CATERBONE reiterates his request that he be
granted an "unspecified date" by which to comply with the district court's ORDER to
amend his Complaint "at least until Plaintiff can resume operations in his office at
his residence at 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA." without all of the obstruction
of justice violations that was making it impossible to litigate this case. The matter of
the specified date was before the Third Circuit of Appeals. By ORDER dated July 3, 2007, the
Third Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed CATERBONE's appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
In response to the Third Circuit's ORDER, on July 13, 2007, the district court issued
an ORDER directing CATERBONE to file an Amended Complaint by August 15, 2007.
The district court again warned CATERBONE that failure to do so would result in the
dismissal of this case, with prejudice. On July 24, 2007, CATERBONE filed a Motion for Continuance,
seeking an extension of time until October 15, 2007 to file an Amended Complaint.
CATERBONE's request for an extension was opposed by at least one defendant,
MANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT. Notwithstanding, by ORDER dated July
25, 2007, the district court again granted CATERBONE's request for an extension of
time to file an Amended Complaint. The district court established a new deadline of
October 15, 2007, and specifically provided that if CATERBONE did not amend his
complaint by that date, his case would be dismissed, with prejudice. The district
court stated that no additional extensions of time would be granted.
Verdana">On October 15,
2007 CATERBONE filed a 62 page Amended Complaint with the following preface
AND NOW on this 15th, day of October, 2007, I, Stanley J. Caterbone, PLAINTIFF,
Pro Se Litigant, do hereby file before the Courts an AMENDMENT to the above case.
The PLAINTIFF requests the Court to grant an additional 60 days to further amend
this complaint and to amend and/or dismiss case no. 06-4650 (Mainly Obstruction of
Due Process Complaints from 2005 to 2007) on or before December 15, 2007, at the
time of the next amendment to this complaint. The PLAINTIFF also seeks
clarification from the Court per the rules of original service; otherwise the PLAINTIFF
will service all defendants, both original and the additional defendants per the 120-
day rule after the filing of the next amendment to this complaint. The PLAINTIFF will
also meet with the Federal Bureau of Investigation on October 15, 2007 at the time
of this filing to report activities, which have prevented the PLAINTIFF from
completing this amended complaint per the ORDER of July 25, 2007.
Verdana">CATERBONE
researched how to file an amended complaint on the Internet and followed the
only rules he could find from another U.S. Circuit Court. CATERBONE does not know
if a computer hacker corrupted the documents in ORDER to sabotage his amended
filing. CATERBONE followed the rules per adding new counts and defendants, as well
as the servicing of original defendants versus new defendants added to the
amended complaint. In the Amended Complaint filed on September 15, 2007 CATERBONE also
addressed the statute of limitations of the causes of actions in his complaint by the
following: 1. Legal Arguments and issues of
the Statute of Limitations and Time Barred Causes of Actions that support that
justice has been denied and due process subverted thus granting relief to the
PLAINTIFFS: a. (RICO), 18 U.S.C. 1961 et seq.;
A claim may be barred by the statute of limitations if you discovered or reasonably
should have discovered your injury four or more years ago. b. In
ORDER to be "related," the criminal acts must involve the same victims, have the
same methods of commission, involve the same participants, or be related in some
other fashion. A pattern may be sufficiently continuous if the criminal actions
occurred over a substantial period of time or posed a threat of indefinite duration.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">c. The former patterns are referred to as closed-
ended patterns; the latter patterns are referred to as open-ended patterns.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">d. Accordingly, even if you have been injured by a
criminal act, you will not have a RICO claim unless that criminal act is part of a
larger pattern of criminal activity. By ORDER dated October 22, 2007 (only 7 days after the
amended complaint was filed), the district court dismissed the case, with prejudice,
for failure to file a valid amended complaint. The Honorable Mary J. McLaughlin
stated the following: This new and, according to the plaintiff, incomplete complaint
in this action named eight defendants; the instant Amendment to Complaint names
several dozen defendants and includes 38 counts. Because the plaintiff has failed to
file a valid amended complaint nearly 16 months after this Court granted him leave
to do so, this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. The district court's ORDER was entered the following day, on October 23,
2007. On Friday,
November 23, 2007, one day after the Thanksgiving Holiday (30th day)
CATERBONEs Notice of Appeal was recorded. On December 12, 2007 Judge Mary A.
McLaughlin granted CATERBONE In Forma Pauperis status for his notice of appeal to
the Third Circuit. On December 12, 2007 CATERBONE (appeared personally at the U.S.
Courthouse) filed a Motion for an Extension of Time to File a Response to the
Question of Jurisdiction and on the same day filed a Motion for the Appointment of
Counsel. On
December 13, 2007 CATERBONE filed a letter to the Clerk of Court of the Third
Circuit Court with complaints of misconduct. On December 19, 2007 CATERBONE filed another
letter to the Clerk of the Third Circuit with more complaints of misconduct regarding
this case. On
December 26, 2007 Fulton filed a Response to the question of jurisdiction in support
to dismiss this appeal for failure to file an untimely appeal. On January 15, 2008 the Court
granted CATERBONE 21 additional days to file a Response to the question of
jurisdiction. Fulton wrote the following in its Response: It is worth noting that during
the almost sixteen (16) month period of time he was given to file an Amended
Complaint, but failed to do so, CATERBONE did manage to file numerous other
lawsuits, motions, briefs and appeals against countless defendants, utilizing reams
of paper in the process. It is worth noting that since the filing of the original complaint on
May 16, 2005, CATERBONE, has made numerous legitimate complaints of real
allegations of misconduct and criminal activity regarding retaliation and intimidation
that has prevented him from filing an amended complaint to law enforcement
officials on the local, state, and federal level. The allegations included proven
activities of computer and electronic hacking, theft of legal and business files,
judicial misconduct, mail fraud, and provisions of the RICO anti-SLAPP statute. There
have also been as many as 21 criminal citations, (vexatious litigation and false
arrests) filed against CATERBONE since May 16, 2005 that have been Nolle Prosed,
Dismissed, or Overturned on Appeal in the Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas; and prosecuted by the Lancaster County District Attorney. On December 20,
2006 while CATERBONE was falsely imprisoned in the Lancaster County Prison, The
Lancaster County Sheriffs Office and Fulton Bank illegally executed a sheriff sale on
the office and residence of CATERBONE while the judgment and foreclosure were
before the Pennsylvania Superior Court. To make matters worth, all of CATERBONEs
material possessions and contents of his residence at 220 Stone Hill Road,
Conestoga, Pa, including all of his business and court filings, documents, and
evidentiary materials; were stolen by Parula (Central Penn Property Services/Noble
Real Estate) Properties. CATERBONE filed an insurance claim and numerous stolen
property claims with law enforcement. The property and his vehicle were not found
and returned until four (4) months later, on April 13, 2007. On or about February 4, 2008
CATERBONE filed a Response to the Letter of Jurisdiction. CATERBONE argued that
this Appeal should not be ruled untimely and be dismissed and cited Rule 6 (a) of
the Rules of Federal Procedure (Computation of Time) and Rule 6 (d) (Additional
Time After Certain Kinds of Service). CATERBONE argued that the 30th day for filing
of the Appeal fell on November 22, 2007, Thanksgiving Day, which is a legal Federal
holiday. CATERBONEs Notice of Appeal was filed in the Courts on November 23,
2007, the next legal business day, which is considered timely according to the Rules
of Federal Procedure. On March 27, 2008 the Court, Circuit Judges AMBRO, FUENTES and
JORDAN ruled on the following: 1. By the Clerk for
possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect; 2. By the
Clerk for possible dismissal under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) or for possible summary
action under I.O.P. 10.6; 3. Appellants
jurisdictional response; 4. Jurisdictional
Response by Fulton Bank; 5. Motion by
Appellee, Manheim Township Police Department, to dismiss appeal;
and 6. Appellants motion for appointment of counsel in
the above captioned case. The Court ORDERED: The question of jurisdiction, and the
motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, are referred to the merits panel. See I.O.P.
10.3.5. We do not dismiss the appeal under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) or take summary
action under I.O.P. 10.6. The Clerk is directed to issue a briefing schedule. We note,
however, that this ORDER does not represent a finding of appellate jurisdiction in
this matter. As in all cases, the panel of this Court that reviews the appeal on its
merits will make a final determination of appellate jurisdiction. In addition to any
other issues the parties wish to raise in their briefs, the parties shall address
whether the District Court erred in dismissing the case without addressing the
factors set forth in Poulis v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 747 F.2d 863 (3d Cir.
1984). The motion for appointment of counsel is denied. On April 22, 2008 the Third Circuit
Court of Appeals issued a BRIEFING AND SCHEDULING ORDER. The ORDER issued
the following: 1. It is ORDERED that the brief for
the Appellant(s) and the joint appendix shall be filed and served on or before June 2,
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">2. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the brief(s) for the
Appellee(s) shall be filed and served within (30) days of service of Appellants
(Appellants) brief. 3. It is FURTHER ORDERED that a
reply brief, if any, shall be filed and served within (14) days of service of Appellants
(Appellants) brief. 4. It is FURTHER ORDERED that in
the event of default by Appellant in filing the brief and appendix as directed, the
appeal may be dismissed without further notice. 5. It is FURTHER ORDERED that if the Appellee fails to file a brief within
the time directed, the matter will be listed on Appellants brief only and Appellee
may be subject to such sanctions as the Court deems
appropriate. On May 9, 2008 CATERBONE filed a 12 page 30 day Request for
Extension of Time of the Briefing Schedule extending the due date until July 2, 2008.
CATERBONE cited 24 acts of harassment and intimidation within the City of
Lancaster Pennsylvania and the County of Lancaster Pennsylvania that have
prevented CATERBONE from filing and serving a brief as so ORDERED by the
Court. On May
27, 2008 CATERBONE was GRANTED a 30-day Extension of Time until July 2, 2008 to
comply with the Briefing Schedule, as ORDERED by the
Court. On June 7,
2008 CATERBONE sent via USPS Priority mail 3 civil complaints in U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, all of which were received and require
additional forms for recording. In CATERBONE v. The City of Lancaster, et. al.,
CATERBONE outlines 2 or more years of abuse of process (ignoring complaints and
not investigating), violations of the Federal Torts Claim Act, libel, slander, and other
counts against the Lancaster City Bureau of Police for not protecting his property
and effects while in the courts. In CATERBONE v. The Lancaster County District
Attorneys Office, CATERBONE cites 15 false arrests since 2005; 60 days of false
imprisonment; and 3 years of vexatious litigation against numerous defendants. In
CATERBONE v. The Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, et., al., CATERBONE
cites a false arrest; 7 months of an illegal revocation of CATERBONEs Pennsylvania
drivers license; abuse of process (ignoring complaints and not investigating), and
other civil torts. All of these complaints and civil torts have caused CATERBONE
irreparable harm with the courts and were used as a weapon in vexatious litigation
and resulted in a loss of time and interrupted his litigation thus obstructing justice in
this and other cases. 6. SUMMARY OF THE
ARGUMENTS The ORDER under appeal of October
23, 2007 that DISMISSED this case by The Honorable Mary J. McLaughlin stated the
following: AND NOW, this 22nd day of October, 2007, upon consideration of the
plaintiffs Amendment to Complaint and Motion for Continuance to further amend
the complaint (Docket No. 61), and of the Courts ORDER that the plaintiffs
amended complaint was due by October 15, 2007, and that the Court would grant
no further extensions of time (Docket No. 58), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case
is DISMISSED. This new and, according to the plaintiff, incomplete complaint in this
action named eight defendants; the instant Amendment to Complaint names
several dozen defendants and includes 38 counts. Because the plaintiff has failed to
file a valid amended complaint nearly 16 months after this Court granted him leave
to do so, this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. The ORDER, which came only 7 days
after the filing of CATERBONEs amended complaint clearly did not consider that
CATERBONE was pro se, nor was it consistent with Rule 15, and was an extreme
sanction unwarranted by CATERBONE. The District Court erred and abused its
discretion in not applying a merits analysis. In addressing the Distict Courts
assertion that CATERBONE should be sanctioned with dismissal for failure to file a
[completed] amended complaint within a specified period, the Third Circuit clearly
states in Donnelly v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 677 F.2d 339, 342 (3d Cir.1982),
that "dismissal is a drastic sanction and should be reserved for those cases where
there is a clear record of delay or contumacious conduct by the
plaintiff." The Third
Circuit clearly recognizes cases that warrant considerations and protection from
abuse of discretion and erroneous rulings in the dismissal of cases with meritereous
claims. The following excerpt from the opinion in Poulis v. State Farm Fire &
Cas. Co supports this notion: We recognize that recent literature exhorting the
district judges to move litigation expeditiously by taking firm control and the 1983
amendments of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure with their numerous references
to sanctions may have contributed to premature dismissals or defaults. Although
sanctions are a necessary part of any court system, we are concerned that the
recent preoccupation with sanctions and the use of dismissal as a necessary
"weapon" in the trial court's "arsenal" may be contributing to or effecting an
atmosphere in which the meritorious claims or defenses of innocent parties are no
longer the central issue. It does not further the goal of a court system, that of
delivering evenhanded justice to litigants, to suggest, as did the district court here,
that the plaintiffs would have a remedy by suing their counsel for malpractice, App.
at 5, since this would only multiply rather than dispose of
litigation. 7.
ARGUMENTS a) <SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; mso-fareast-font-
family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-
US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-bidi-
font-size: 12.0pt">Did the District Court Abuse Its Discretion in its
DISMISSAL on October 22, 2007 by not taking into consideration: that the
APPELLANT (CATERBONE) was appearing pro se with special status with the right to
liberal construction; all of the abuses and civil rights violations that the APPELLANT
has brought to the District Courts attention in previous motions and pleadings; and
that CATERBONE did not have a clear record of delay or contumacious conduct?
 In addressing the district courts notion that the Amended Complaint was
not complete CATERBONE had submitted a 62 page Amended Complaint to the
district court. The Amended Complaint contained all of the necessary elements
required to construct a complaint. The history and introduction were already part of
the record in the district court. The Jurisdiction contained most of the federal
statutes by name, however there were more that CATERBONE wanted to address
but ran out of time. In the first paragraph of the Amended Complaint CATERBONE
states: AND NOW on this 15th, day of October, 2007, I, Stanley J. Caterbone,
PLAINTIFF, Pro Se Litigant, do hereby file before the Courts an AMENDMENT to the
above case. The PLAINTIFF requests the Court to grant an additional 60 days to
further amend this complaint and to amend and/or dismiss case no. 06-4650 on or
before December 15, 2007, at the time of the next amendment to this complaint.
The PLAINTIFF also seeks clarification from the Court per the rules of original
service; otherwise the PLAINTIFF will service all defendants, both original and the
additional defendants per the 120-day rule after the filing of the next amendment to
this complaint. The PLAINTIFF will also meet with the Federal Bureau of Investigation
on October 15, 2007 at the time of this filing to report activities, which have
prevented the PLAINTIFF from completing this amended complaint per the ORDER of
July 25, 2007. On October 15, 2007 after filing the amended complaint in person to the
Clerk of Courts Office in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania,
Caterbone did meet with the Federal Bureau of Investigation at the Philadelphia
Field Office, located in the same building, the U.S. Courthouse, and did report follow-
up complaints. CATERBONE was attempting to consolidate case 06-4650 (amended
complaint was also due on the same day) with this case. some of the additional
defendants and causes of actions were from that case, which the district court also
sanctioned with DISMISSAL. CATERBONE used rules of procedure regarding Amendments to a
complaint are governed by Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule
15(a) and a document titled How To Amend Your Complaint which he researched
on the internet. See Exhibit. In addressing the Distict Courts assertion that CATERBONE
should be sanctioned with dismissal for failure to file an amended complaint within
a specified period, the Third Circuit clearly states in Donnelly v. Johns-Manville Sales
Corp., 677 F.2d 339, 342 (3d Cir.1982), that "dismissal is a drastic sanction and
should be reserved for those cases where there is a clear record of delay or
contumacious conduct by the plaintiff." It is clear and on the record in CATERBONE
v. City of Lancaster, et. al., and CATERBONE v. Lancaster County District Attorney
Office, et. al., and in the numeorus complaints filed with the FBI and other law
enforcement; that CATERBONE was burdened with violations of civil rights and other
civil torts that have impeded his due process and resulted in obstruction of justice in
denying CATERBONE fair due process to complete the amended complaint
according to the courts mandated time schedule . On June 14, 2006 CATERBONE filed a
reply to FUTLON BANKS RESPONSE to CATERBONES Motion for an Ex Parte Meeting
and argued the following: PLAINTIFF (CATERBONE) filed the original complaint on
May 16, 2005 prematurely due to the undo influence and intimidation of several
DEFENDANTS and other persons, entities, and or organizations; specifically the
threat of a fabricated criminal prosecution. CATERBONE was cited with several
false arrests (7) after that reply was written. This accurately depicts the
environment in which CATERBONE was trying to litigate this case in, while clearly
and accurately illustrating the arrogance and maliciousness of those trying to have
this case and CATERBONE from anything close to justice to right the 20 years of
wrongs that he has endured. CATERBONE has filed abuse of process complaints against local
and state law enforcement for not protecting CATERBONEs rights and due process
in this case, as well as others . It is evident that those same said violations are still
occurring today. That being the case, there is no clear record of delay or
contumcious conduct by CATERBONE in failing to file the amended complaint
according to the District Courts deadline. Federal Torts Claims Act violations will be
filed in the future. It was not CATERBONEs actions or willful neglect was responsible for not
adhering to the district courts ORDER of amending the complaint according the the
Federal Rules of Procedure by the specified time period, September 15, 2007.
CATERBONE was the victim of a vast array of misconduct, wrongdoing, and criminal
acts that have obstructed his constitutional right to due process, which in itself
made it impossible for CATERBONE to amend the complaint within the specified
time period mandated by the District Court. b)Did District Court err in dismissing the
case without addressing the factors set forth in the merits analysis in Poulis v. State
Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 747 F.2d 863 (3d Cir. 1984)?
 The Third Circuit clearly recognizes
cases that warrant considerations and protection from abuse of discretion and
erroneous rulings in the dismissal of cases with meritereous claims. The following
excerpt from the opinion in Poulis v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co supports this
notion: We
recognize that recent literature exhorting the district judges to move litigation
expeditiously by taking firm control and the 1983 amendments of the Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure with their numerous references to sanctions may have
contributed to premature dismissals or defaults. Although sanctions are a necessary
part of any court system, we are concerned that the recent preoccupation with
sanctions and the use of dismissal as a necessary "weapon" in the trial court's
"arsenal" may be contributing to or effecting an atmosphere in which the
meritorious claims or defenses of innocent parties are no longer the central issue. It
does not further the goal of a court system, that of delivering evenhanded justice to
litigants, to suggest, as did the district court here, that the plaintiffs would have a
remedy by suing their counsel for malpractice, App. at 5, since this would only
multiply rather than dispose of litigation. The Third Circuit further states: We reiterate what
we have said on numerous occasions: that dismissals with prejudice or defaults are
drastic sanctions, termed "extreme" by the Supreme Court, National Hockey
League, 427 U.S. at 643, 96 S.Ct. at 2781, and are to be reserved for comparable
cases. <BR style="FONT-
preceding opinion by the Third Circuit clearly and unoquivically was written to
protect this case and others from an unjust and premature dismissal. The District
Court should have addressed the factors of the merits analysis set forth in Poulis v.
State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 747 F.2d 863 (3d Cir. 1984) in making a
determination and the drastic sanction of an early
DISMISSAL. 8.
CONCLUSION Law enforcement and the authorities
must be made to bear the burden of their abuse of process (ignoring complaints and
not investigating) and violations of the Federal Torts Claim Act. This corrupted
environment denied CATERBONE his right to due process to properly amend this
complaint by the specified time mandaed by the district court and according to the
rules of procedure. The right of due process is clearly stated in Amendment XIV of
the Untied States Constitution: Section 1. All
persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction
thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No
state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities
of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life,
liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its
jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. CATERBONE should not be made to bare that burden
and compromise his right to due process with a consequence of the drastic and
sever sanction and dismissal of this case. The court should also recognize that CATERBONE is
pro se and was denied his Motion For Counsel in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.
CATERBONE included claims in his Amended Complaint that address misconduct,
wrongdoing, and malice by as many as 5 highly qualified attorneys that selectively
refused to properly advise and represent CATERBONE in the pursuit of the claims in
this case from 1987 to 2005. By 2005, CATERBONE was left with no alternative but
to appear pro se. The court would be excersising its right to administer justice while
protecting the doctrines of equality to all that come before the courts with meritous
claims for relief and redress by ruling in favor of CATERBONE.
Verdana">The District Court
should apply the merits analysis as outlined in Poulis v. State Farm Fire & Cas.
Co., 747 F.2d 863 (3d Cir. 1984) and allow CATERBONE leave for an unspecified time
to amend the complaint in this case and consider consolidating the complex cases
filed by CATERBONE. The complexity of CATERBONEs cases should not be made to
compromise his right to due process of the law according the the XIV Amendment of
the U.S. Constitution. Sanctions and Alternative Sanctions may be appropriate to grant
CATERBONE relief for legal fees and costs, while attempting to litigate this case.
CATERBONE is considered indegent by the district court to appear in forma
pauperis, and proper redress would be appropriate. The levy of fines would be
appropriate to consider against the guilty parties, namely Fulton Bank for filing the
Motion to Establish a Deadline to Amend the Complaint on June 19, 2006 and
appearing at least negligent as the lender in the illegal sheriff sale of his residence
and subsequent stolen property ; and the Manhiem Township Police Department for
filing motions which have delayed expeditious litigation in this
case. In Zucker
v. Westinghouse, 374 F.3d 221, 227 (3d Cir. 2004) the Third Circuit Court recognized
that, absent an expression of congressional intent to the contrary, a plaintiffs
entitlement to attorneys fees is not eliminated merely because he/she was pro se
counsel. Date: July
1, 2008 Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Advanced media
Group 1250 Fremont Street Lancaster, PA 17603 mailto:amgroup01@msn.com www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and
correct copy of the Amended Complaint will been served the 1st day of july of 2008,
by first class mail, Postage prepaid, or by electronic mail upon (With Permission), or
by hand deliver to: Patricia Baxter, Esq. Walter H. Swayze,
III, Esq. 30 South 17th
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">Suite 1700, United Plaza Philadelphia, PA 19103 George M. Gowen, 111, Esquire Stuart A. Weiss, Esquire Cozen
O'Connor 1900 Market
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">Philadelphia, PA 1 9103 Christopher S. Underhill,
Esq. Hartman, Underhill & Brubaker,
LLC 221 East Chestnut Street Stephanie Carfley, Esquire Attorneys
For Defendant Fulton Bank 126 East King
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">Lancaster, Pa 17602-2893 Robert W. Hallinger Appel & Yost
LLP 33 North Duke St Lancaster, Pa 17602 




______________________________ Date: July 1, 2008


 Stanley J.
Caterbone, Pro Se 




 1250 Fremont
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">




 Lancaster, PA 17603 




amgroup01@msn.com 




http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/ </DIV>
</DIV>
<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify"> APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Page 23: I) Amended Complaint of September 15, 2007 filed by
CATERBONE (Case No. 05-cv-2288 Caterbone v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al.,)
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">2. Page 23: II) Amended Complaint of September 15,
2007 filed by CATERBONE (Case No. 05-cv-2288 Caterbone v. Lancaster County
Prison, et. al.,) 3. Page 24: III) Argument contained in the Response to the Jurisdictional
Letter filed by CATERBONE on February 4, 2008(Case No. 05-cv-2288 Caterbone v.
Lancaster County Prison, et. al.,) 4. Page 25: IV) Fulton Bank Response to CATERBONE Motion for
Ex Parte Meeting with Judge McLaughlin(Case No. 05-cv-2288 Caterbone v.
Lancaster County Prison, et. al.,) 5. Page 26: V) Letter of December 18, 2005 to the Honorable
Judge Mary A. McLaughlin requesting an ex parte meeting sent by CATERBONE
(Case No. 05-cv-2288 Caterbone v. Lancaster County Prison, et.
al.,) 6. Page
28: VI) OPINION AND MEMORANDUM by the Honorable Mary J. McLaughlin filed on
June 13, 2006(Case No. 05-cv-2288 Caterbone v. Lancaster County Prison, et.
33: VII) Letter from CATERBONE to the Honorable Mary J. McLaughlin of January 9,
2007 (Case No. 05-cv-2288 Caterbone v. Lancaster County Prison, et.
35: EXHIBITS a. Page 35: October 22, 2007 ORDER of DISMISSAL by Judge
McLaughlin b. Page 36: November 20, 2007 Notice of Appeal to Third
Circuit c. Page
37: How TO AMEND YOUR COMPLAINT d. Page 39: 747 F.2d 863 40 Fed.R.Serv.2d 313 Lefteri POULIS and
Athena Poulis, his wife, Appellants, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY.
No. 83-5600. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. e. Page 47: July 12, 2007 Letter to
U.S. Senator Arlen Specter, Arlen Specter, United States Senate, Washington, DC
20510-3802 f. Page 49: July 16, 2007 Letter to Federal Bureau of Investigations, J.
Edger Hoover Building, 935 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, D.C. 20535-
0001 g. Page
53: December 3, 2007 Letter to R. Scott Smith, Chairman, President, and Chief
Executive Officer, Fulton Financial Corporation, One Penn Square, P.O. Box 4887,
Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17604 h. Page 56: December 20, 2007 Letter to Supervisor, Federal
Bureau of Investigation, FBI Harrisburg Field Office, Harrisburg, PA
FAMILY: Verdana">i. Page
56(a): Attachments (Calendars) to the December 20, 2007 Letter to Supervisor,
Federal Bureau of Investigation, FBI Harrisburg Field Office, Harrisburg, PA
17108 I) Amended Complaint of September
15, 2007 filed by CATERBONE (Case No. 05-cv-2288 Caterbone v. Lancaster County
Prison, et. al.,): AND NOW on this 15th, day of
October, 2007, I, Stanley J. Caterbone, PLAINTIFF, Pro Se Litigant, do hereby file
before the Courts an AMENDMENT to the above case. The PLAINTIFF requests the
Court to grant an additional 60 days to further amend this complaint and to amend
and/or dismiss case no. 06-4650 (Mainly Obstruction of Due Process Complaints
from 2005 to 2007) on or before December 15, 2007, at the time of the next
amendment to this complaint. The PLAINTIFF also seeks clarification from the Court
per the rules of original service; otherwise the PLAINTIFF will service all defendants,
both original and the additional defendants per the 120-day rule after the filing of
the next amendment to this complaint. The PLAINTIFF will also meet with the
Federal Bureau of Investigation on October 15, 2007 at the time of this filing to
report activities, which have prevented the PLAINTIFF from completing this
amended complaint per the ORDER of July 25, 2007. II) Amended Complaint of
September 15, 2007 filed by CATERBONE(Case No. 05-cv-2288 Caterbone v.
Lancaster County Prison, et. al.,): 3. Legal Arguments and issues of the Statute of Limitations and Time
Barred Causes of Actions that support that justice has been denied and due process
subverted thus granting relief to the PLAINTIFFS: a. (RICO), 18 U.S.C. 1961 et seq.; A claim may be barred by the
statute of limitations if you discovered or reasonably should have discovered your
injury four or more years ago. b. In ORDER to be "related," the criminal acts must involve the same
victims, have the same methods of commission, involve the same participants, or
be related in some other fashion. A pattern may be sufficiently continuous if the
criminal actions occurred over a substantial period of time or posed a threat of
indefinite duration. c. The former patterns are referred to as closed-ended patterns; the latter
patterns are referred to as open-ended patterns. Accordingly, even if you have been injured by a criminal act, you will not
have a RICO claim unless that criminal act is part of a larger pattern of criminal
activity. III)
Argument contained in the Response to the Jurisdictional Letter filed by CATERBONE
on February 4, 2008(Case No. 05-cv-2288 Caterbone v. Lancaster County Prison, et.
al.,): III.
ARGUMENT - CATERBONE'S APPEAL OF THE DISTRICT COURT'S ORDER OF OCTOBER
22, 2007 IS TIMELY AND SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED BECAUSE THIS COURT DOES
HAVE JURISDICTION TO HEAR THE APPEAL. According to Federal Rules of Procedure. Rule 6.(a)
The last day of the period so computed shall be included, unless it is a Saturday, a
Sunday, or a legal holiday, or, when the act to be done is the filing of a paper in
court, a day on which weather or other conditions have made the of6ee of the clerk
of the district court inaccessible, in the event the period runs until the end of the
next day which is not one of the aforementioned days. The last day, or the 30th day
was November 22, 2007; which was Thanksgiving Day, a legal holiday according to
the Rules of Federal Procedure and the Rules of Federal Appellate
Procedure. In
addition, According to Federal Rules of Procedure Rule 6.(c) Additional Time After
Certain Kinds of Service. Whenever a party must or may act within a prescribed
period after service and service is made under Rule 5(B)(2)(b), (C), or (D), 3 days
are added after the prescribed period would otherwise expire under subdivision (a).
Service of the ORDER of October 23rd, 2007 by Judge McLaughlin was made by 1st
class mail, which is included in Rule 5(B)(2)(b); which adds 3 days to the prescribed
period. The Notice
of Appeal, filed on November 23, 2007 in the Clerk of Courts of the U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania was timely. According to the Federal
Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 26. COMPUTING AND EXTENDING TIME (a)
Computing Time. The following rules apply in computing any period of time
specified in these rules or in any local rule, court order, or applicable
statute: (1) Exclude the day of the act,
event, or default that begins the period. (2) Exeluding intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays when
the period is less than 11 days, unless stated in calendar days. (3) Include the last day of the period unless it in a
Saturday, Sunday, legal holiday, or-if the act to be done is filing a paper in court--a
day on which the weather or other conditions make the clerk's office
inaccessible. (4) As used in this rule, "legal
holiday" means New Year's Day, Martin Luther Kirrg, Jr.'s Birthday, Washingtons
Birthday, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Columbus Day, Veterans'
Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day, and any other day declared a holiday by the
President, Congress, or the state in which is located either the district court that
rendered the challenged Judgment or order, or the circuit clerk's principal
office. According
to Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 26. Computing and Extending Time. (c)
Additional Time After Service. When a party is required or permitted to act within a
prescribed period after a paper is served on that party, 3 calendar days are added
to the prescribed period unless the paper is delivered on the date of service stated
in the proof of service. Three days shall be added to the 21 days required for this
Response Regarding Jurisdiction to be filed. IV) Fulton Bank Response to CATERBONE Motion for
Ex Parte Meeting with Judge McLaughlin(Case No. 05-cv-2288 Caterbone v.
Lancaster County Prison, et. al.,): FULTON BANK RESPONSE Defendant, Fulton Bank, by and through its attorneys, Barley Snyder,
LLC, hereby files the following Response in opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Ex
Parte Meeting with the Honorable Mary A. McLaughlin: On or about June 2, 2006,
Plaintiff filed a Motion requesting an ex parte meeting with the Honorable Mary A.
McLaughlin "to discuss the problems of preceding, this action without obstruction of
justice; and to amend the original complaint as discussed previously." See Plaintiffs
Motion. However, Plaintiff provides no justification whatsoever for his request for an
ex parte meeting with the Court. Rather, Plaintiff apparently labors under the false
assumption that by proceeding pro se he is absolved of all responsibility to comply
with the rules. Such is not the case. The fact that Plaintiff decided to be his own
lawyer does not excuse him from following the rules of civil procedure or entitle him
to any particular advantage for lack of legal training. "The right of self-
representation is not a license to abuse the dignity of the courtroom. Neither is it a
license not to comply with relevant rules of procedural and substantive law." Faretta
v. California, 422 U.S. 806,834 n. 46,95 S.Ct. 2525,2541 n. 46,45 L.Ed.2d 562
(1975). V) Letter
of December 18, 2005 to the Honorable Judge Mary A. McLaughlin requesting an ex
parte meeting sent by CATERBONE (Case No. 05-cv-2288 Caterbone v. Lancaster
County Prison, et. al.,): December 18, 2005 Stanley J. Caterbone (pro se) 220 Stone
Hill Road Conestoga, PA
FAMILY: Verdana">United
States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Honorable Judge Mary A. McLaughlin Room #
13614 601 Market Street, Room
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">Philadelphia, PA 19106-1748 Phone: (215) 597-7704 Fax: (215) 597-
6390 600 Re: Case
No. 05-2288 Honorable Judge Mary A. McLaughlin, On Thursday, December 15th, in the
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, I had my
341 Conference with Mr. Ward of the Trustees office of the Department of Justice,
under oath. This meeting was recorded by Mr. Ward; the only persons present were
a Security Officer of the courts, myself, and Mr. Ward. No creditors elected to
attend. During our
meeting I was asked to determine the date of time in which I will be able to submit
my reorganization plan to the courts as prescribed by law. My answer was that I
have not had access to the above aforementioned case, and until I do, it would be
difficult to develop such a plan. I had also given Mr. Ward my direct testimony why
this case was filed prematurely, by myself, and the direct incidents which forced me
to file this case on May 16, 2005, in well before I was able to complete my
complaint for the courts. Since the filing of the above sealed case, I have not had any access to
this complaint, which has been necessary to amend, both the defendants list and
the complaint itself. I have attempted to correspond with
the courts via facsimile and registered letter on numerous occasions for that very
same purpose. On October 28th, 2005, I had visited the Clerk of Courts to ascertain
information regarding the same. It was on this day that the clerks instructed me to
your chambers to inquire directly with you. If you recall, you and several of your
clerks appeared before me in your chambers, at which time you cited ex parte rules.
It was on the instructions of the clerks in the Clerk of Courts office that directed me
to your chambers, since they were under someones direction not to provide me
with any information concerning my case, or allow me
access. Since the
filing of this case, on May 16, there have been many developments which directly
support and prove my claims, all of which need to be addressed in my
complaint. There has
also been numerous legal, political, and investigative issues in Washington, D.C.,
that have arisen regarding the sensitive National Security concerns that I have
raised, and those must also be addressed in this case. As you are aware, there are
at least 2 Grand Juries currently in progress concerning the same, both of which are
under the direction of Special Prosecutor Mr. Fitzgerald in the Chicago Office of the
Attorney General, and currently the proposed legislation for the Patriot Act. There
has also been at least one Grand Jury appointed in the Lancaster County District
Attorneys office concerning many of my issues that I have defined in my
complaint. Within the
past few weeks, I have had to file complaints with the IFCC of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation concerning the hacking and intrusion of my computer and related
business activities (see attached). In the past months, I have had numerous filings from the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Lancaster County, courts that have been
corrupted, intercepted, or never sent by the originator, where certificates of service
were required by law. This is outlined in detail in my complaint with the
Pennsylvania Judicial Review Board, case number , and can also be
substantiated from the record of a preliminary hearing before District Magistrate
Boyd, District held on December 1, 2005. Enclosed you will also find my Request for Appeal,
filed with the Pennsylvania Housing Agency, on December 14, 2005, which
addresses several issues that directly address several issues in the above
aforementioned case. I am requesting a Hearing to determine the status and the direction of
this case, from you, or an officer of the courts with whom you select. I will provide a
formal request, if required, as soon as possible. Respectfully, Stanley J.
Caterbone cc: Honorable Judge Thomas M.
Twardowski, United States Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of
Pennsylvania Mr. Hugh Ward, Department of
Justice, Office of the United States Trustee, Eastern District of
size=2>Mr. Donald Totaro, District Attorney,
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Lancaster County VI) OPINION AND MEMORANDUM by
the Honorable Mary J. McLaughlin filed on June 13, 2006(Case No. 05-cv-2288
Caterbone v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al.,): OPINION AND MEMORANDUM The pro se plaintiff has made numerous allegations against numerous
defendants in his eighty-seven page complaint The Court will dismiss the complaint
as to moving defendants Mellon Bank (named as "Commonwealth National Bank"),
Manheim Township Police Department, and Fulton Bank for failure to state a
claim. The Court
will also dismiss the complaint as to non-moving defendants Southern Regional
Police Department, Stone Harbor Police Department, Avalon Police Department,
Lancaster County Prison and Lancaster County Sheriff's Department for failure to
serve the complaint and summons. I. Failure to State a Claim Each of
the moving defendants has moved to dismiss on the ground that the plaintiff has
failed to state a timely claim.' The United States Court of Appeals for the Third
Circuit permits 1 The pro se plaintiff has not opposed any of the motions to dismiss.
By letter to the Court dated March 2, 2006, request filed March 6, 2006, and letter
to the Court dated April 4, 2006, Fulton Bank, Manheim Township, and Mellon Bank
respectively requested that their motions be granted as uncontested, pursuant to
Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7.l(c). The United States Court o Appeals for the ~hird
Circuit has indicated, however, that courts should not grant motions to dismiss
against unrepresented parties without undertaking a merits analysis: Stackhouse v.
Mazurkiewicz, 951 F.2d 29, 30 (3d Cir. 1991). defendants to raise a statute of
limitations defense in a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b) (6) if the time-bar is
apparent on the face of the complaint. Robinson v. Johnson, 313 F.3d 128, 135 (3d
Cir. 2002). <BR style="FONT-
plaintiff's eighty-seven page complaint contains many allegations regarding
numerous persons and entities. The plaintiff's sole allegation against Mellon
Bank/Commonwealth National Bank, however, is that it wrongfully repossessed the
plaintiff's airplane in July 1987.' According to the complaint, the Bank loaned the
plaintiff $97,000 towards the purchase of an airplane in June 1987. The following
month, before any payments were due, the Bank allegedly repossessed the plane,
with all of the plaintiff's personal and business files on board. The plaintiff claims
that the Bank sought to harm the plaintiff's business to reduce its competition in the
mortgage banking and financial services businesses, in violation of the 'lender
liability laws." (compl. 25, 31, 34, 37, 83, 3.) I The plaintiff named "Commonwealth National Bank
((i.e. Mellon Bank)" as the defendant, but apparently attempted to effect service by
sending a copy of the complaint to "Legal Counsel, Mellon Bank, N.A." (Doc. No. 8).
According to Mellon Bank, Mellon formerly owned Commonwealth National. For the
purposes of its current motion, Mellon accepted the plaintiff's attribution of
Commonwealth National's actions to Mellon. (Mellon's Mot. to Dismiss Mem. at 1
n.1.) The Court
assumes that the plaintiff intended to name Mellon Bank as a defendant for the
actions of Commonwealth National Bank, and will consider and grant Mellon Bank's
motion to dismiss as described. If the plaintiff intended to sue only Commonwealth
National Bank, however, the complaint would be dismissed as to Commonwealth
National Bank for failure to effect service. The plaintiff has not explicitly asserted any causes
of action against the Bank. Construing the allegations in the complaint in the light
most favorable to the plaintiff, however, the plaintiff has arguably asserted claims
against the Bank for conversion, replevin, trespass, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty,
and/or breach of contract arising out of the alleged
repossession. Plaintiffs bringing any of these claims must do so within two or four
years. See 42 Pa. C.S. 5 5524(3) and ( 7 ) (imposing two year statute of limitations
on any "action for taking, detaining or injuring personal property, including actions
for specific recovery thereof,'' and "[a]ny other action or proceeding to recover
damages for injury to person or property which is founded on negligent, intentional,
or otherwise tortuous conduct or any other action or proceeding sounding in
trespass, including deceit or fraud"); Glaziers & Glassworkers Union Local No.
252 Annuity Fund v. Newbridqe Sec., 93 F.3d 1171, 1186 (3d Cir. 1996) (a breach of
fiduciary duty is tortious conduct, subject to a two year statute of limitations) ; 42
Pa.C.S. 5525(a) (imposing four year statute of limitations on actions based on
written, express, or implied contracts). The plaintiff initiated this lawsuit in May
2005, over seventeen years after the alleged repossession. It is clear from the face
of the complaint that the plaintiff's claims against the Bank are time-
barred. I When
considering a motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) (61, a court accepts all
facts and allegations listed in the complaint as true and construes them in the light
most favorable to the plaintiff. H.J. Inc. v. Nw. Bell Tel. Co., 492 U.S. 229, 249 (1989);
Rocks v. City of Philadelphia, 868 F.2d 644, 645 (3d Cir.
1989). With
respect to the Manheim Township Police Department, the plaintiff has alleged that:
(11 when the plaintiff asked for help regarding the repossession of his airplane in
July 1987, the Department's response was to ask "what bank branch repossessed
your aircraft"; (2) on or around September 3, 1987, Detective Larry Sigler falsely
charged the plaintiff with making terroristic threats; (3) on the same day, after the
plaintiff was arrested for taking his own files from his own office, Detective Larry
Mathias refused to take his statement or inform him of the charges against him, and
unnamed officers used excessive force against him; and (4) in January 1991, a Lt.
Madenspacher called the plaintiff regarding his letter to the Department of Defense
about alleged blackmail occurring in 1987, but failed to attend a scheduled
meeting. (Compl. at 5-6, 33, 39-40, 59.) Again construing the allegations in the complaint in the light most
favorable to the plaintiff, he has arguably asserted: (1) assault, battery, false imprisonment, false arrest, malicious
prosecution and/or malicious abuse of process claims arising out of the charges and
arrest in September 1987; and (2) civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. 5 1983, arising
out of the Department's actions or inactions in July and September 1987, and
January 1991. (2) The plaintiff's claims against the
Manheim Township Police Department are also time-barred. Plaintiffs must bring any claims
for intentional torts such as assault, battery, false imprisonment, false arrest,
malicious prosecution and/or malicious abuse of process within two years. 42 Pa.
C.S. 5524(1). Plaintiffs must also bring any 5 1983 civil rights claims within two years.
Garvin v. Citv of Philadel~hia, 354 F.3d 215, 220 (3d Cir. 2003) (1 1983 claims are
subject to Pennsylvania's two statute of limitations governing personal injury
actions). The plaintiff initiated this lawsuit more than fourteen years after his last
alleged interaction with the Manheim Township Police
Department.' Finally, the plaintiff has alleged that Fulton Bank: (1) was involved in
some sort of collusion in 1987; ( 2 ) embezzled $5,000 from his checking account in
1990, did not credit the account for more than 60 days, and never credited the lost
interest income; and ( 3 ) refused to allow the plaintiff's brother, Thomas Caterbone,
to deposit a check in 1996, on the grounds that no funds were available, and was
therefore responsible for his suicide/wrongful death later that year. The plaintiff has
also alleged that, in February 2005: (a) he had difficulty accessing certain account
statements and was told that he had to pay for copies of those statements; and (b)
a bank customer representative informed him that when a customer wants to
deposit a check for which no funds are available, the bank must give the customer a
choice between depositing the check or waiting until there are
funds. Finally,
the plaintiff has included in his complaint what appears to be a May 6, 2005 article
from the Intelligencer Journal that names Fulton Bank as a limited partner in Penn
Square Partners, an alleged stakeholder in a proposed Lancaster County Convention
Center. (Compl. at 6 ( a ) , 55-56, 80-81, 86.) 4 The complaint states that the plaintiff "rescinded
efforts for due process immediately after loosing [sic] his home and business," but it
also states that the plaintiff "began to review his case" again in October 1990.
(Compl. at 5 6 . ) The plaintiff has arguably asserted claims against Fulton Bank for: (1)
breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, and/or unjust enrichment, for its actions toward the
plaintiff in 1990; and (2)fraud or wrongful death, for its actions toward the plaintiff's
brother in 1996. These claims are time barred as well. As explained above, there is
a two-year statute of limitations on actions for breach of fiduciary duty or fraud. 42
Pa. C.S. $35524(3) and (7). There is a four-year statute of limitations on unjust
enrichment, which is a quasi-contractual claim. 42 Pa. C.S. 5525(4). Finally, there
is a two-year statue of limitations on actions for wrongful death. 42 Pa. C.S. S
5524(2). <BR style="FONT-
plaintiff's reference to "collusion in 1987" on the part of Fulton Bank is too vague to
state a claim for anything, even under the liberal notice pleading standards.
Likewise, the plaintiff's allegations regarding his ability to access certain account
statements in February 2005 does not state any recognizable claim. The plaintiff
does not allege that it was illegal for Fulton Bank to charge to copies of account
statements, or fraudulent for Fulton Bank to say that it charged. The plaintiff states
only that he found the charge "disheartening," in light of the non-profit status of the
account holder. (Compl. at 81.) Similarly, the plaintiff's allegations regarding Fulton Bank's policy
on depositing checks with insufficient funds, and its status as a limited partner in
Penn Square Partners, do not state any claim of wrongdoing against Fulton
Bank. 11. Failure
to Serve the Complaint The Court will also dismiss the complaint as to the non
moving defendants because the plaintiff has failed to properly serve the complaint
and summons, and has therefore failed to compl) with the Court's January 5 , 2006
Order. The plaintiff bears the burden of showing that service was valid. Grand
Entertainment Grouw, Ltd. v. Star Media Sales, Inc., 988 F.2d 476, 488 (3d Cir.
1993). <BR style="FONT-
plaintiff has not submitted any evidence that he attempted to serve the Southern
Regional Police Department. For each of the other defendants, the plaintiff filed a
"Certificate of Service," certifying that the plaintiff mailed "the foregoing pleading to
certain a named or unnamed individual(s) associated with the defendant, via
certified mail. The plaintiff's attempts at service were improper as to the Lancaster
County (Pennsylvania) Prison and Sheriff's Department, and the Stone Harbor and
Avalon (New Jersey) Police department. Each of these defendants is an arm of a
governmental organization. Rule 4(j) (2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides
Service upon a state, municipal corporation or other governmental organization
subject to suit shall be effected by delivering a copy of the summons and of the
complaint to its chief executive officer or by serving the summons and complaint in
the manner prescribed bv 5 Mellon Bank, Manheim Township Police Department,
and Fulton Bank also moved to dismiss for improper service. Because the Court is
dismissing the complaint as against them for failure to state a claim, the Court need
not decide the sufficiency of service as to these defendants, the law of that state for
the service of summons or other like process upon any such defendant. Fed. R. Civ.
P. 4 (j) (2) (emphasis added). Rule 422(b) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil
Procedure provides : Service of original process upon a political subdivision shall be
made by handing a copv to (1) an agent duly authorized by the political subdivision
to receive service of process, or (2) the person in charge at the office of the
defendant, (3) the mayor, or the president, chairman, secretary or clerk of the tax
levying body thereof . . . . Pa. R. Civ. 0. 422(b) (emphasis added) Here, the plaintiff
attempted to serve the Lancaster County Prison and Sheriff's Department by
mailing a copy of the complaint to Howard L. Kelin at Kegel, Kelin, Almy &
Grimm, LLP in Lancaster, Pennsylvania.' The plaintiff's attempt at service was
improper under the federal and Pennsylvania rules of civil procedure because a
copy of the complaint and summons were not personally served upon an
appropriate person. The New Jersey Court Rules also provide that the primary method of
obtaining in personal jurisdiction over a public body defendant is to personally
serve a copy of the summons and complaint on the public body's presiding officer,
clerk or secretary, or on a person authorized by appointment or by law to receive
service of process on the public body's behalf. N.J. Court 6 By letter dated February
2, 2006 (on which the plaintiff was cc'd), Mr. Kelin informed the Court that he had
been appointed Interim Special Counsel to Lancaster County, but was not an agent
duly authorized to receive service of process. R. 4 :4-4 (a) (1) and (8) . New Jersey permits
plaintiffs to make service by mail, but provides that service by mail is only effective
if the defendant answers the complaint or otherwise appears in response thereto. If
defendant does not answer or appear within 60 days following mailed service, the
plaintiff must make personal service. N.J. Court R. 4:4-4(c). The plaintiff attempted to serve the
Stone Harbor Police Department by mailing the complaint to Michael Donahue, an
attorney at law in Stone Harbor, New Jersey, on January 17, 2006. The plaintiff also
attempted to serve the Avalon Police Department by mailing the complaint to
Stephen Basse, an attorney at law in Vineland, New Jersey, on that date. The
plaintiff's attempts to make service by mail were ineffective under federal or New
Jersey law because neither the Stone Harbor or Avalon Police Departments have
answered or otherwise responded to the complaint in well over 60 days. Moreover,
the plaintiff has not shown that Mr. Donahue or Mr. Basse are the appropriate
persons to receive service for these public bodies. VII) Letter from CATERBONE to the
Honorable Mary J. McLaughlin of January 9, 2007 (Case No. 05-cv-2288 Caterbone v.
Lancaster County Prison, et. al.,): January 9, 2007 Stan Caterbone Advanced Media
FAMILY: Verdana">The Honorable Judge Mary A. McLaughlin,
J. The United States District Court
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">For the Eastern District of
size=2>601 Market
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">Philadelphia, PA 19101 Re: Case No. 05-2288; 06-4650; 06-
5138; 06-4734; 06-CV-4154; 06-5117; 06-2236; 05-23059BKY Your Honor; I am writing to notify the Courts that
I have been released from the Lancaster County Prison on December 29, 2006 at
3:30pm Eastern Standard Time. Unfortunately I have been unable to contact you
prior to this time because of my pressing criminal Court schedule and the fact that I
had no funds available to purchase paper or postage. As you can see from the
attached, I was at least falsely imprisoned , and was released upon the success of
my Appeal in the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster
County . I allege
that the imprisonment was meant as another means of harassment and
intimidation, and therefore used to obstruct my Right to Due Process and Access to
the Courts. The Civil Conspiracy to undermine my efforts to file my Federal False
Claims Act violations and the above cases continues to this
day. Would you
kindly copy this correspondence and circulate the attached to the other Judges
presiding over the above cases? I also have lost all of the files and evidence that are
material to these matters as explained in the Addendum to the Petition to Set Aside
the Sale. I am requesting another Continuance until further notice and again am
requesting an Ex-Parte meeting with Your Honor. Thank you for your attention to this
matter. Respectfully, Stan J.
size=2>EXHIBITS 
<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify"> IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
PENNSYLVANIA IN THE CASE OF: STANLEY J. CATERONE : CIVIL ACTION : Case No. 05-2288 ORDER AND NOW this 22nd day of October,
upon consideration of the Plaintiffs Amendment to Complaint and Motion for
Continuance to further amend the complaint (Docket No. 61) and of the Courts
Order that the Amended Complaint was due by October 15, 2007 and the Court
would grant no further extensions of time, (Docket No. 58) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
that this case is DISMISSED. This new and,
according to the plaintiff, incomplete complaint in this action named eight
defendants; the instant Amendment to Complaint names several dozen defendants
and includes 38 counts. Because the plaintiff has failed to file a valid amended
complaint nearly 16 months after this Court granted him leave to do so, this case is
DISMISSED with prejudice. BY THE
COURT, MARY A.
MCLAUGHLIN, J. EXHIBIT 
<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: center">UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA </DIV>
<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify"> </DIV>
<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: center">
<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: left">Stanley J. Caterbone : 
PLAINTIFF : : v. :


 CASE NO. 05-2288 :
: Lancaster County Prison, et al.
: </DIV> NOTICE OF APPEAL </DIV>
<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify"> Notice is hereby given that Stanley J. Caterbone, in the above named
case, hereby appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit from
an ORDER that failed to consider the Amended Complaint, DENIED Motion for
Continuance to further amend the complaint, and DISMISSED the above captioned
case, entered in this action on the 22nd day of October,
2007. Date: November
20, 2007 Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant 1250
Fremont Street Lancaster, PA
17603 amgroup01@msn.com http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/ </DIV></F
ONT>
</DIV>
Verdana">EXHIBIT HOW TO AMEND YOUR COMPLAINT If you have forgotten to state an important matter in
your complaint, you discover something new after you filed your complaint, you
want to add a defendant, or you want to insert the true name of a John Doe
defendant, you may be able to file an amended complaint. An amended complaint
does not just add to the first complaint. Once you file an amended complaint it
entirely replaces your original complaint. Amendments to a complaint are governed by Rule
15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 15(a) provides
that: A party
may amend the partys pleading once as a matter of course at any time before a
responsive pleading is served or, if the pleading is one to which no responsive
pleading is permitted and the action has not been placed upon the trial calendar,
the party may so amend it at any time within 20 days after it is served. Otherwise a
party may amend the partys pleading only by leave of court or by written consent
of the adverse party; and leave shall be freely given when justice so requires. A
party shall plead in response to an amended pleading within the time remaining for
response to the original pleading or within 10 days after service of the amended
pleading, whichever period may be the longer, unless the court otherwise
orders. This
means that if the defendant has not yet filed an answer to your complaint, you can
file one amended complaint without permission of the Court. If the defendant has
filed a motion to dismiss but has not filed an answer, you are still entitled to file one
amended complaint without permission. (You are only permitted to file one
amended complaint before defendant files an answer; if you wish to file a second
amended complaint before defendant files an answer, you must obtain defendants
consent or you must obtain permission from the Court). However, if the defendant
has already filed his answer to your complaint, you must get written consent from
the defendant or permission of the Court before amending your complaint. If the
defendant agrees in writing that you can file an amended complaint, you must ask
the judge to write So Ordered on the written consent, indicating that the judge
has approved the consent. If the defendant does not give you written consent, you
can ask permission from the Court by filing a motion to amend the complaint and
including a copy of the proposed amended complaint with your motion papers.
Instructions for preparing a motion are attached and are available
separately. If you file
an amended complaint. It must be captioned as an Amended
Complaint. 2 FILING AND SERVING THE AMENDED
COMPLAINT SERVICE OF THE AMENDED
COMPLAINT BEFORE THE ORIGINAL
COMPLAINT HAS BEEN SERVED If you decide to
amend your complaint before defendant has been served with your original
complaint and summons, you should serve the amended complaint on defendant
and file the original amended complaint with the Pro Se Office as
follows: 1. Make copies of your amended
complaint. 2. Keep one copy for your own
records. 3. File the original of your amended
complaint with the Pro Se Office. 4. If you have not
added new defendants in your amended complaint, use the summons that was
originally issued by the Court. 5. Have a copy of
the summons and a copy of the amended complaint served on each defendant by
someone who is over eighteen and is not a party to the action. The original
summons with the seal of the court embossed on it must be returned to the Court,
so do not serve the original summons on any defendant. 6. Have the person who serves the summons and amended complaint on
each defendant complete an affidavit or affirmation of service of process
form. 7. Make a copy of the affidavit or affirmation of
service of process and keep it for your own records. 8. Attach the original affidavit or affirmation of service to the original
summons. 9. File the original summons and the
affidavit or affirmation of service of process with the Pro Se Office. SERVICE OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT AFTER
THE ORIGINAL COMPLAINT HAS BEEN SERVED ON ALL
DEFENDANTS If you decide to amend your
complaint after the defendant has been properly served with your original complaint
and summons (and you have not added any new defendants in your amended
complaint), you should take the following steps: 1. Make copies of your amended complaint. 2. Keep one copy for your own records. 3. Send a copy of your amended complaint to the attorney for each
defendant by ordinary first-class mail. 4. Complete an
affidavit or affirmation of service of process form stating that the amended
complaint was mailed to each defendant. 5. Make a
copy of the affidavit or affirmation of service of process and keep it for your own
size=2>6. File the original amended
complaint and your original affidavit or affirmation of service of process with the Pro
Se Office. DELIVERY
OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT AFTER THE ORIGINAL COMPLAINT HAS BEEN SERVED ON SOME DEFENDANTS BUT NOT ON
OTHERS If you
decide to amend your complaint after some defendants have been served with your
original complaint and summons but before other defendants have been served (or
you have added new defendants in your amended complaint), you should take the
following steps: 1. Make copies of your amended
complaint. 2. Keep one copy for your own
size=2>3. Send a copy of your amended
complaint by ordinary first-class mail to each defendant who has already been
served. 4. Complete an affidavit or
affirmation of service of process form stating that the amended complaint and
summons was mailed to each defendant. 5. Make a
copy of the affidavit or affirmation of service of process and keep it for your own
size=2>6. File the original amended
complaint and original affidavit or affirmation of service of process with the Pro Se
Office. 7. If you have not added new
defendants in your amended complaint, you must serve the amended complaint on
the defendant who has not yet been properly served. If you have added new
defendants, the Court will issue an amended summons, which must be served with
the amended complaint. If you are adding defendants, you must bring this to the
attention of the Pro Se Writ Clerk. 8. Have a copy of
the amended summons and a copy of the amended complaint served 4 pursuant to
Rule 4 of the Federal Rules on any defendant who was not previously served with
the original complaint. 9. Have the
person who served the amended summons and the amended complaint to each of
the new defendants complete an affidavit or affirmation of service of process
form. 10. Make a copy of the affidavit or affirmation of
service of process. 11. Attach the affidavit or
affirmation of service of process to the amended summons. 12. File the original amended summons and the original affidavit or
affirmation of service of process with the Pro Se Office. If you have questions regarding any
of the procedures listed above, please contact the Pro Se Office at 718-613-
2665. </DIV>
</DIV>
Verdana">747 F.2d 863 40 Fed.R.Serv.2d
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">Lefteri POULIS and Athena Poulis, his wife,
Appellants, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY. No. 83-5600. United States
Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued April 3,
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">Decided Nov. 5, 1984. George Retos, Jr. (Argued), Retos, Held & Associates, Washington,
Pa., for appellants. Paul K. Geer (Argued), Jones, Gregg,
Creehan & Gerace, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee. Before GIBBONS, SLOVITER, Circuit Judges, and BISSELL, District
Judge*. OPINION OF THE
COURT SLOVITER, Circuit
Judge. 1 This appeal, as well as another decided today involving the same
attorney and district court judge, Scarborough v. Eubanks, 747 F.2d 871, is brought
from a final order dismissing the complaint with prejudice due to counsel's failure to
meet court-imposed deadlines and other procedural
requisites. I. Background 2
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">Lefteri and Athena Poulis filed suit against State
Farm Fire and Casualty Company (State Farm) in November 1981, in the Court of
Common Pleas of Washington County, Pennsylvania, to recover under an insurance
policy after fire damaged their home. State Farm removed the case to the United
States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania based on diversity of
citizenship. In its answer, it denied liability, asserting that plaintiffs had intentionally
caused the fire, had concealed and misrepresented information, and had not filed
their action in time. On March 12, 1982, the district court ordered that discovery would close
June 14, 1982; that plaintiffs' pre-trial statement would be due July 5; and that
defendant's statement would be due July 26. A pre-trial conference was set for
August 13. The docket reveals no action by plaintiffs seeking discovery. On April 15,
State Farm filed notice of service of interrogatories on plaintiffs. No answers to
these interrogatories were or have ever been filed, and plaintiffs did not file their
pre-trial statement by July 5 as required. Therefore defendant filed its pre-trial
statement first, on July 28, together with a motion to compel answers to
interrogatories. A member of the district judge's staff advised plaintiffs' counsel,
George Retos, Jr., that the statement was overdue and Retos promised to submit a
statement by the next day. He neither did so nor requested any extension. On
August 5 the district court, sua sponte, dismissed the case with prejudice for
plaintiffs' failure to comply with the orders to file the pre-trial
statement. Retos filed a pre-trial statement on August 9, together with a motion
under Rule 60(b) to reconsider and set aside the dismissal, alleging that an illness
prevented him from working between July 6 through July 17; that other attorneys
could not have taken over because only Retos spoke Greek and could communicate
with plaintiff Lefteri Poulis; that Retos' pregnant wife went into false labor on July 29
and 30, and that he had "inadvertently set aside the required work for the instant
case on July 29, 1982, due to his concern for his wife" and was "render[ed] unable
to prepare the necessary Pre-Trial Statement;" that on his return to work other tasks
had backlogged; and that although he had dictated a statement on August 4, it had
been mailed on August 6 when it was typed and ready. 5 The district court denied
reconsideration. On appeal, this court vacated the order of dismissal. Poulis v. State
Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 714 F.2d 124 (3d Cir.1983) (Poulis I ) (per curiam). We
noted there was "no allegation that plaintiffs, as distinguished from their counsel,
were in any way responsible for the failure to comply with the court's order." We
recognized that in National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc., 427
U.S. 639, 96 S.Ct. 2278, 49 L.Ed.2d 747 (1976), a dismissal was upheld where
plaintiffs had acted in "flagrant bad faith" and counsel "had behaved with 'callous
disregard' of [his] responsibilities," id. at 643, 96 S.Ct. at 2781, but observed that
"[t]he case at hand is not as extreme." We pointed out that in an earlier opinion, Donnelly v.
Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 677 F.2d 339, 342 (3d Cir.1982), we had stated that
"dismissal is a drastic sanction and should be reserved for those cases where there
is a clear record of delay or contumacious conduct by the plaintiff." However,
because Retos' excuses failed to account for many days on which a pre-trial
statement could have been filed, we observed that some sanction was "amply
justified." Accordingly, we vacated the dismissal and remanded to permit the district
court to consider alternatives to dismissal, stating, "Alternatives are particularly
appropriate when the plaintiff has not personally contributed to the
delinquency." On remand, the district court ordered the parties to file briefs on
appropriate alternative sanctions. Plaintiffs' brief, filed four days late, stated that
such sanctions would be costs, attorneys' fees, and monetary penalties imposed on
him, but argued that "[s]ince the Third Circuit has specifically assessed the costs of
the appeal in this matter against plaintiffs' counsel personally, it has ruled on the
sanctions which are to be applied in the instant matter [and] alternative sanctions
are now inappropriate." App. at 10-11. In its brief State Farm took a more reasonable
position. It noted that "[i]n this case the defendant has been more prejudiced by
plaintiffs' failure to answer interrogatories then [sic] by its counsel's failure to file
the Pre-Trial Statement on time." App. at 16. State Farm urged the court to reopen
discovery so that it could "have the opportunity to examine plaintiffs' Answers to
Interrogatories, conduct further investigation if necessary, and depose the plaintiffs
or other witnesses known to plaintiffs if such action is deemed necessary and
appropriate." App. at 15. State Farm suggested, "If discovery is reopened, State
Farm believes there would be no need to utilize the somewhat harsh remedy of
limiting or restricting plaintiffs' witnesses at trial." App. at 16 (emphasis added). In
light of this court's order, State Farm requested an award of $750.00 in attorneys'
fees which it incurred because of the dismissal and appeal, and sought a
prospective limitation on interest due should it ultimately be held liable on plaintiffs'
claim. 9 Significantly, in its
brief State Farm further stated, "State Farm strongly believes that the most
expeditious manner of disposing of this case can be provided by ruling on the
Defendant's Motion to Dismiss which was filed on July 7, 1982," approximately three
weeks following the close of discovery and which was denied by the district court
because of its policy not to consider motions to dismiss filed more than two weeks
after the close of discovery. App. at 16. Notwithstanding the defendant's submission, the
district court reinstated its sua sponte sanction of dismissal, stating that there was
no appropriate alternative: There are no costs which can be charged to
plaintiffs' counsel at this point. Further, this was not a situation in which defense
counsel was forced to make an unnecessary trip to court because of plaintiffs'
counsel's failure to appear. The defendant has only been required to incur fees in an
amount that would have been incurred if the case normally proceeded to this point.
Thus, this is not an appropriate case for attorney's fees. Finally, the court finds no
authority for levying a fine against plaintiffs' counsel as a penalty. Rather than
imposing fines and costs of [sic] other sanctions prior to dismissal, plaintiffs' counsel
was afforded many opportunities to cure the problems, but he has failed to do so.
Sanctions not being appropriate, the court has no alternative but dismissal to
motivate plaintiff's counsel to comply with deadlines. App. at 3-4 (footnotes and citation
omitted). The district court intimated its displeasure with the remand in Poulis I but
it was unequivocal in its disagreement with the remand in a similar case from
another district, Titus v. Mercedes Benz of North America, 695 F.2d 746 (3d
Cir.1982). The district court stated: "Judge Garth's dissent in Titus, indicates that
deliberate, dilatory action is a basis for dismissal, even under Donnelly, and further
indicates that the Circuit Court should only reverse such a decision for abuse of
discretion.... [T]his Court finds Judge Garth's dissent persuasive and adopts his
dissent, and the cases cited therein, as further support for this decision." App. at 5
(emphasis added). We treat this extraordinary statement at the outset. Whatever may be
the personal views of the district court as to the merits vel non of a decision of this
court, the district court is not free to "adopt" the dissent. This court is strict in its
adherence to the precedent of its earlier opinions. Our own Internal Operating
Procedures are explicit and provide, It is the tradition of this court that reported panel
opinions are binding on subsequent panels. Thus, no subsequent panel overrules a
published opinion of a previous panel. Court in banc consideration is required to
overrule a published opinion of this court. Internal Operating Procedures of the Court of
Appeals for the Third Circuit, Chapter 8.C. If the judges of this court are bound by
earlier panels, a fortiori district court judges are similarly bound. Recognition of the
hierarchical nature of the federal judiciary requires no less. Moreover the reported decisions of
this court over the past two years evidence the consistency of this court's rulings
emphasizing the extreme nature of a dismissal with prejudice or default judgment.
See Hritz v. Woma Corp., 732 F.2d 1178 (3d Cir.1984); In re MacMeekin, 722 F.2d 32
(3d Cir.1983); Madesky v. Campbell, 705 F.2d 703 (3d Cir.1983); Gross v. Stereo
Component Systems, Inc., 700 F.2d 120 (3d Cir.1983); Titus v. Mercedez Benz of
North America, 695 F.2d 746 (3d Cir.1982); Feliciano v. Reliant Tooling Co., 691 F.2d
653 (3d Cir.1982); Farnese v. Bagnasco, 687 F.2d 761 (3d Cir.1982); Donnelly v.
Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 677 F.2d 339 (3d Cir.1982).1 We recognize that recent literature
exhorting the district judges to move litigation expeditiously by taking firm control
and the 1983 amendments of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure with their
numerous references to sanctions may have contributed to premature dismissals or
defaults. Although sanctions are a necessary part of any court system, we are
concerned that the recent preoccupation with sanctions and the use of dismissal as
a necessary "weapon" in the trial court's "arsenal" may be contributing to or
effecting an atmosphere in which the meritorious claims or defenses of innocent
parties are no longer the central issue. It does not further the goal of a court
system, that of delivering evenhanded justice to litigants, to suggest, as did the
district court here, that the plaintiffs would have a remedy by suing their counsel for
malpractice, App. at 5, since this would only multiply rather than dispose of
litigation. We reiterate what we have said on numerous occasions: that dismissals
with prejudice or defaults are drastic sanctions, termed "extreme" by the Supreme
Court, National Hockey League, 427 U.S. at 643, 96 S.Ct. at 2781, and are to be
reserved for comparable cases. II. Analysis In exercising our appellate function
to determine whether the trial court has abused its discretion in dismissing, or
refusing to lift a default, we will be guided by the manner in which the trial court
balanced the following factors, which have been enumerated in the earlier cases,
and whether the record supports its findings: (1) the extent of the party 's personal
responsibility; (2) the prejudice to the adversary caused by the failure to meet
scheduling orders and respond to discovery; (3) a history of dilatoriness; (4)
whether the conduct of the party or the attorney was willful or in bad faith; (5) the
effectiveness of sanctions other than dismissal, which entails an analysis of
alternative sanctions; and (6) the meritoriousness of the claim or
defense. We turn to apply these factors in the circumstances of this
case. 1. The extent of
the party's personal responsibility. There has been no suggestion by any party or by
the district court that the Poulis plaintiffs are personally responsible for the late
pretrial statement, which was the basis for the dismissal. Indeed, Retos has
acknowledged the delays were his responsibility and assigned as the reason his
illness from July 6 through 17 and the subsequent false labor of his wife on July 29
and 30. This is therefore unlike the National Hockey League case where the
Supreme Court upheld the "extreme sanction of dismissal" after noting that there
had been "flagrant bad faith" on the part of the plaintiffs as well as "callous
disregard" by their counsel of their responsibilities. 427 U.S. at 643, 96 S.Ct. at
2781. However, the Poulis' lack of responsibility for their counsel's dilatory conduct
is not dispositive, because a client cannot always avoid the consequences of the
acts or omissions of its counsel. See Link v. Wabash Railroad, 370 U.S. 626, 633, 82
S.Ct. 1386, 1390, 8 L.Ed.2d 734 (1962). 2. Prejudice to the adversary. As the district court stated, there
has been prejudice to the defendant by the plaintiffs' counsel's conduct. The
interrogatories were never answered nor were objections filed; defense counsel was
obliged to file a motion to compel answers, and was obliged to file its pretrial
statement without the opportunity to review plaintiffs' pretrial statement which was
due to be filed first. App. at 4. The court's finding that "defendant encountered lack
of cooperation from the plaintiff in areas where the plaintiff should cooperate under
the spirit of the federal procedural rules," id., is supported by the
record. 3. A history of dilatoriness. As noted above, this litigation has been
characterized by a consistent delay by plaintiffs' counsel. Unlike the Donnelly case,
for example, where there was only one failure to comply in a timely manner, i.e. in
obtaining local counsel, in this case there has been a pattern of dilatoriness. Time
limits imposed by the rules and the court serve an important purpose for the
expeditious processing of litigation. If compliance is not feasible, a timely request
for an extension should be made to the court. A history by counsel of ignoring these
time limits is intolerable. 4. Whether the attorney's conduct was willful or in
bad faith. Although the district court concluded that "plaintiffs' counsel's conduct
[was] of such a dilatory and contumacious nature to require dismissal," App. at 5,
there is nothing in the record to support the "contumacious" finding. Nothing in the
court's discussion preceding this conclusion is directed toward the willfulness issue
but only toward dilatoriness. There has been no suggestion or indication that
counsel's illness during July 1982 and his wife's late pregnancy and false labor at
the end of that month did not occur as he represented. In the appellants' brief, counsel
characterizes his conduct as "excusable neglect" and seeks to explain the district
court's characterization of his conduct as "deliberate" and "contumacious" as the
result of a "personality conflict" between counsel and the district judge. Appellants'
brief at 8. He refers us to four recent appeals in which he allegedly "clashed" with
the same district judge.2 However, even in those cases in which we vacated the
dismissal, the record showed that counsel failed to comply with the rules and
deadlines imposed by the district court. Thus, while some disaffinity has apparently
been engendered between the district judge and counsel we see no basis to hold
the district judge responsible. Nonetheless, as noted at the beginning of this
section, we also find no basis for terming counsel's conduct in this case
"contumacious". 5. Alternative sanctions. The district court concluded that it had "no
alternative but dismissal" because no other sanctions were appropriate. The district
court stated that there was no authority for levying a fine against plaintiffs' counsel
as a penalty. See Gamble v. Pope & Talbot, Inc., 307 F.2d 729 (3d Cir.) (in banc),
cert. denied, 371 U.S. 888, 83 S.Ct. 187, 9 L.Ed.2d 123 (1962).3 However, the court
also stated that "there are no costs which can be charged to plaintiffs' counsel at
this point." This finding was erroneous. Defendant's counsel had asked the court to
impose as a sanction the $750 attorney fee which it had incurred in defending the
appeal in Poulis I. The district court apparently assumed that the costs of that
appeal had already been charged to plaintiffs' counsel. However, we had not
assessed any attorney's fee as part of our imposition of appeal costs on plaintiffs'
counsel personally.4 The district court also could have imposed on plaintiffs' counsel
the costs, including attorney's fees, of preparing the motion to compel answers to
interrogatories and the brief on alternative sanctions, all of which were incurred
because of the dilatoriness of plaintiffs' counsel. Under the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure and the 1983 amendments, the district court is specifically authorized to
impose on an attorney those expenses, including attorneys' fees, caused by
unjustified failure to comply with discovery orders or pretrial orders. See Fed.R.Civ.P.
16(f), 37(a)(4), 37(b), 37(d) and 37(g). See also 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1927. The most direct
and therefore preferable sanction for the pattern of attorney delay such as that
which the district court encountered in this case would be to impose the excess
costs caused by such conduct directly upon the attorney, with an order that such
costs are not to be passed on to the client, directly or indirectly. This would avoid
compelling an innocent party to bear the brunt of its counsel's dereliction. Dismissal
must be a sanction of last, not first, resort. 6. Meritoriousness of the
claim. In considering
whether a claim or defense appears to be meritorious for this inquiry, we do not
purport to use summary judgment standards. A claim, or defense, will be deemed
meritorious when the allegations of the pleadings, if established at trial, would
support recovery by plaintiff or would constitute a complete defense. See United
States v. $55,518.05 in U.S. Currency, 728 F.2d at 195; Feliciano v. Reliant Tooling
Co., 691 F.2d at 657; Farnese v. Bagnasco, 687 F.2d at 764. In this case, the defendant
suggested to the district court that the most expeditious way to process this
litigation was to rule on its motion to dismiss plaintiffs' claim as untimely because it
was not brought within a year of the loss, as required by the policy. The district
court's denial of that motion because of its "policy ... not to consider motions to
dismiss filed more than two weeks after the close of discovery," Order of August 2,
1982, appears to conflict with Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h)(2) which permits a defense of
failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted to be raised by motion as
late as at the trial on the merits. Since the motion was timely under Rule 12(h)
because it was pleaded in the answer, its consideration by the district court might
have avoided the entire controversy regarding the pretrial proceedings and the two
appeals to this court, and could have given the parties a disposition on the
merits.5 Certainly, the defense that the plaintiffs' claim must fail because it has
not been brought within the one year limitation provision of the policy is, on its face,
compelling. See Schreiber v. Pennsylvania Lumberman's Mutual Ins. Co., 498 Pa. 21,
444 A.2d 647 (1982). In their complaint plaintiffs made no allegation that would
avoid this facial untimeliness by invoking Pennsylvania's law of waiver of the time
limit set forth in an insurance policy. See Commonwealth v. Transamerica Ins. Co.,
462 Pa. 268, 341 A.2d 74 (1975). Moreover, plaintiffs filed no answer to the motion
to dismiss. For the purpose of evaluating the facial validity of the claim or defense,
we cannot rely on the vague and nonspecific statements in plaintiffs' pretrial
memorandum that they would produce witnesses to show that defendant led them
to believe they would not be barred from filing an action on the claim more than 12
months from the date of the fire. While we express no opinion on whether summary
judgment or dismissal would have been warranted on this ground, the existence of
a prima facie defense is a factor to be weighed along with the foregoing
factors. III. Conclusion The above factors should be weighed by the district courts in order to
assure that the "extreme" sanction of dismissal or default is reserved for the
instances in which it is justly merited. In this case, although there was no
contumacious behavior, the pattern of dilatory behavior is compounded by the
plaintiffs' failure to file any answers to interrogatories, defendant was compelled to
file its pretrial statement without such answers and without seeing plaintiffs' pretrial
statement, and there is a prima facie defense to the claim. Under these
circumstances, although we might not have reached the same result as did this
district court judge, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion in
ordering the dismissal. Therefore, we will affirm the judgment of the district
court. * Hon. John W.
Bissell, United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, sitting by
designation We believe it important to point out that we have not hesitated to affirm
the district court's imposition of sanctions, including dismissals in appropriate cases,
cf. United States v. $55,518.05 in U.S. Currency, 728 F.2d 192 (3d Cir.1984) (default
judgment) (in which Judge Garth dissented on the ground that the dispute was
prematurely ended without being reviewed on the merits), although under our
procedures that is often done by judgment order affirmance In two of these cases, this one and
Scarborough v. Eubanks, also decided today, 747 F.2d 871 (3d Cir.1984), the district
court dismissed the complaint, and in the third, the court entered a default
judgment against Retos' client, Miller v. Blower, No. 82-0757 (W.D.Pa. Feb. 2, 1983),
vacated and remanded, 732 F.2d 146 (3d Cir.1984) (unreported). The fourth case,
United States v. Golna, No. 81-179 (W.D.Pa.) aff'd, 714 F.2d 125 (3d Cir.1983)
(unreported), was not appealed on the basis of any sanctions imposed by the
district court This issue is presently pending before this court in Eash v. Riggins
Trucking, Inc., No. 83-5664 (order for in banc consideration filed Oct. 11,
1984) It was a non
sequitur for plaintiff to have argued in his brief on alternative sanctions filed with
the district court that since we specifically assessed the costs of the appeal against
him personally, we already ruled on the sanctions to be applied. If so, there would
have been no basis for us to have remanded for precisely this
purpose In this connection we note the commendable procedure followed by
Judge Grady of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, who has
found that attention to some of the legal issues during a discovery conference
called under Rule 26(f) has substantially reduced the need for discovery. See Grady,
Finding Our Way Through the Discovery Jungle, 21 The Judges' Journal 4, 42-43
(1982). CC | TRANSFORMED BY
PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG </DIV>
</DIV>
Verdana">July 12, 2007 Stan Caterbone, Pro Se
Litigant Advanced Media
Verdana">Arlen
Specter United States
Senate Washington, DC 20510-
FAMILY: Verdana">Re: Letter
of June 15, 2007 Dear Mr. Specter: I appreciate your letter of June 15, 2007 and the future of the
Federal Courthouse in Lancaster County. I dont think that there is anything more
important than the integrity of our judicial system. As you are aware, I am following
the Attorney General controversy and would hope that your committee is successful
in restoring the tradition of respect and integrity into that institution. I dont see
how our great country can function with respect without that happening. I would
hope that Attorney General Gonzales takes the high road and resigns in the very
near future, for the greater good. Unfortunately, I have some personal and business issues that I
consider important enough for me to seek your help, as being one of my
representatives to the United States Senate. First of all, I received your letter
yesterday, July 11, 2007. It was held in the mail system or was stolen for almost a
full 30 days. I have had so many complaints regarding the same that I filed a
complaint with the United States Postal Inspector. They had written me but I never
did receive the follow-up to the Investigation as the letter promise. I am attaching a
copy of the letter with the hopes that you could follow-up and make certain that my
complaint is not being subverted. If you are not aware, I have a Federal Whistle-Blowing and Federal
False Claims Act case that I need to file against the United States Attorney General,
as required by law. This case involves the former Department of Defense contractor
International Signal & Control, Plc, (ISC) formerly of Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
Unfortunately, I also have an unprecedented case of obstruction of justice that
surrounds that case, and I am evaluating the merits of waiting until your
subcommittee finds a resolution to U.S. Attorney General controversy before I file
my action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
I am certain that any filing before would only be subject to further misconduct. My
cases now before the United States District Courts and the various Courts of the
Commonwealth have been subject to an unprecedented array of judicial
misconduct. However, I realize that you do not have the authority or the jurisdiction
to intervene, so I am told. There is a problem that I must bring to your attention in
the hopes that you would be able to at least refer me to the appropriate committees
or agency. For approximately the past 19 months I have had the ability to
communicate telepathically. I have spent much time researching this ability through
the various intelligence agencies declassified documents. My problem is that I am connected
24/7 with a person that is compromising my interests and my intellectual property
at a time when I am litigating civil and criminal proceedings. My business interests
are also greatly compromised. I do not know how I became telepathic, or if I was
trained without my knowledge and or consent. I need to seek help in trying to
disconnect. The person that is connected to me subjects me to a brutal array of
mental and psychological abuse. I firmly believe that they are being used as a medium for this
purpose. I have waited 20 years to resolve my issues in a Court of Law, and this is
not a good time for this ability to assert itself, and of course it is very suspect
considering my Federal False Claims Act allegations. Unfortunately, I have had personal
dealings with the Department of Advanced Research Projects (DARPA) that dates
back to 1990 when I had contracts with the National Institute of Standards and
Technology and DARPA. I know that they study and research paranormal activities
and technologies, including remote channeling. My Whistle-Blowing activities and
my knowledge of the fraud within ISC back in 1987, has put me in direct scrutiny of
the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the National Security Agency (NSA) due to
their relationships with ISC, and of course my very public condemnation of the
fraud. In the past
few weeks I have downloaded a declassified document dump from the Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA) that contained hundreds of bibliographies from the Soviet
Union dating as far back as the 1930s regarding this subject. It appears that they
have more knowledge and expertise than the United States. This brings me to a
disclosure that may or may not be concerning. Over the past several months I have
had two contacts and intimate conversation with an 80-year-old Russian immigrant
regarding my problem. She seemed to be knowledgeable of the subject matter and
made several disclosures, which may or not be true. She said that she was a Psychologist
with a Doctorate degree and a former employee of the Pennsylvania State
University System. She also disclosed that her former husband was imprisoned and
tortured by the KGB. I will copy Senator Diane Feinstein of California with this letter. The fact
that she serves on the Judiciary Committee with you and the fact that she is also on
the Senate Select Intelligence Committee might help me find a solution to this
problem. I would hope that you both might be able to help me find someone that
can help me disconnect from this other telepathic person, while at the same time
taking any making certain there are no National Security
issues. In another
matter, I also will enclose a copy of an email from the Government Accounting
Office (GAO) pertaining a document that I am trying to locate that was sent to me in
1987 from the GAO. I would appreciate it if you could follow-up on this and make
sure I am afforded the FOIA for this document. I look forward to your
response. Sincerely, Stan J.
Caterbone cc: USPS
Certified Mail Enclosures: Letter of June 15, 2007 May 24,
2007 Letter from United States Postal Inspection Service February 26, 2007 - Email to DARPA April 12,
2007 Email Confirmation from CIA 2002 CIA
Declassified Document July 10, 2007
Email from The GAO </DIV>
</DIV>
size=2>EXHIBIT July 16, 2007 Stan Caterbone, Pro Se
Litigant Federal Bureau of Investigations J. Edger Hoover Building 935 Pennsylvania
Avenue Washington, D.C. 20535-
FAMILY: Verdana">Re:
Important Matters Dear Sir or Madam: First of all, I received a personal letter from Senator Arlen Specter
on July 11, 2007. It was held in the mail system or was stolen for almost a full 30
days. I have had so many complaints regarding the same that I filed a complaint
with the United States Postal Inspector (See Attached). They had written me but I
never did receive the follow-up to the investigation as the letter promise. I am
attaching a copy of the letter with the hopes that you could followup and make
certain that my complaint is not being subverted. If you are not aware, I have a
Federal Whistle-Blowing and Federal False Claims Act case that I need to file against
the United States Attorney General, as required by law. This case involves the
former Department of Defense contractor International Signal & Control, Plc,
(ISC) formerly of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. Unfortunately, I also have an
unprecedented case of obstruction of justice that surrounds that case, and I am
evaluating the merits of waiting until your subcommittee finds a resolution to U.S.
Attorney General controversy before I file my action in the United States District
Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. I am certain that any filing before
would only be subject to further misconduct. My cases now before the United States
District Courts and the various Courts of the Commonwealth have been subject to
an unprecedented array of judicial misconduct. However, I realize that you do not
have the authority or the jurisdiction to intervene, so I am
told. For
approximately the past 19 months I have had the ability to communicate
telepathically. I have spent much time researching this ability through the various
intelligence agencies declassified documents. My problem is that I am connected
24/7 with a person (Sheryl Crow) that is compromising my interests and my
intellectual property at a time when I am litigating civil and criminal proceedings.
My business interests are also greatly compromised. I do not know how I became
telepathic, or if I was trained without my knowledge and or consent. I need to seek
help in trying to disconnect. The person that is connected to me subjects me to a
brutal array of mental and psychological abuse. I firmly believe that they are being
used as a medium for this purpose. I have waited 20 years to resolve my issues in a
Court of Law, and this is not a good time for this ability to assert itself, and of
course it is very suspect considering my Federal False Claims Act
allegations. Unfortunately, I have had personal dealings with the Department of
Advanced Research Projects (DARPA) that dates back to 1990 when I had contracts
with the National Institute of Standards and Technology and DARPA. I know that they
study and research paranormal activities and technologies, including remote
channeling. My Whistle-Blowing activities and my knowledge of the fraud within ISC
back in 1987, has put me in direct scrutiny of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
and the National Security Agency (NSA) due to their relationships with ISC, and of
course my very public condemnation of the fraud. I dont know if any of your agents
have any experience with this type of situation, but there are definitely National
Security issues that may need to be addressed. There are persons that can actually
eaves drop on this type of communication, and I am constantly being question on
matters related to ISC, and other foreign affairs. My knowledge of the Middle East is
quite extensive, and there is always the possibility for someone to glean information
for illegitimate reasons. In the past few weeks I have downloaded a declassified document dump
from the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) that contained hundreds of bibliographies
from the Soviet Union dating as far back as the 1930s regarding this subject. It
appears that they have more knowledge and expertise than the United States. This
brings me to a disclosure that may or may not be concerning. Over the past several
months I have had two contacts and intimate conversation with an 80-year-old
Russian immigrant regarding my problem. She seemed to be knowledgeable of the
subject matter and made several disclosures, which may or not be
true. She said that she was a Psychologist with a
Doctorate degree and a former employee of the Pennsylvania State University
System. She also disclosed that her former husband was imprisoned and tortured by
the KGB. I look
forward to your response. Sincerely, Stan J. Caterbone cc: USPS Certified Mail Enclosures: Letter of June 15,
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">May 24, 2007 Letter from United States Postal
Inspection Service February 26, 2007 - Email to
DARPA April 12, 2007 Email Confirmation
from CIA 2002 CIA Declassified
Document July 10, 2007 Email from The
GAO </DIV>
</DIV>
Verdana">Stanley J.
FAMILY: Verdana">R. Scott Smith Chairman,
President And Chief Executive
Officer Fulton Financial
Corporation One Penn
Square P.O. Box 4887 Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17604 Re: Black Budget
Identities of the United States Government regarding Covert Activates & Mind
Control Rufus Fulton, Former Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer & Department of Defense Caterbone v. Fulton Bank litigation Federal
False Claims Act Complaint re International Signal & Control (ISC) of Lancaster,
PA Dear Mr. Smith: I would like to bring to your attention a very dire matter that
severely implicates Fulton Bank and Fulton Financial Corporation. I would like to
bring to your attention the Rufus Fulton interview of November 21, 2007 broadcast
on WGAL TV 8 News at 6. This interview disclosed National Security information for
the first time regarding his work for the Department of Defense and the Kennedy
Administration. I am suggesting that his classified work with the Department of Defense
and his present influence concerning National Security matters is a dire conflict of
interest concerning my litigation against Fulton Bank that needs to be investigated
by outside agencies and or authorities. I have serious questions regarding the Defense Intelligence
Agency and the possible collusion with your institution. You have to understand that
in July of 2005 while I was visiting a museum on a military base in Austin Texas, I
was detained by 2 agents for the Defense Intelligence Agency and questioned about
my Federal case 02-5588 Caterbone v. Lancaster County Prison, et al., which Fulton
Bank is a defendant, and my whereabouts as well as my
destination. They required me to verify where I was staying, and called my brother
Phil's Doctors office in Austin, whom I was staying with, and caused his staff
problems by getting them alarmed about the situation. They were not very nice and
I left them with the question "We are all on the same team, aren't we?
Verdana">They left me be
on my way after reviewing my documents and my Federal civil complaint, which
included information about ISC and my allegations and Federal False Claims Act;
and demanding that I do not visit any more military bases. To my knowledge I have
had no physical contact since. The problem is the involvement of the Department of Defense,
Mr. Rufus Fultons past affiliation and possible influence, my allegations and civil
complaints against Fulton Bank, and my telepathic abilities and remote viewing .
Verdana">For some time I
have been trying to identify groups and or agencies that may have remotely trained
me. I have written to and personally visited the office of Senator Arlen Specter , the
Federal Bureau of Investigation , the Senate Select Committee for Intelligence , and
corresponded with the Defense Advanced for Research Projects Agency , and the
Central Intelligence Agency with the hopes of finding some answers. However they
have proved fruitless. See the attached research document dated Thursday, November 29,
2007, titled THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT: ITS IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS, by
Richard J. Boylan, Ph.D ; it is a report that identifies organizations, agencies, and
companies that are directly involved with mental telepathy and remote viewing,
most of which operate under the direction and funding of the Department of
Defense. I have just recently discovered this document on Friday, November 30,
2007 and found it most disturbing after having to watch the Rufus Fulton interview
the prior week. Pay particular attention to the items in red
highlight. Your Board
of Directors and the Securities and Exchange Commission should be and will be
alerted to this discovery. I wish you would reconsider your letter of November 14,
2007 and your position no to meet with me personally to discuss some of these
issues. I believe it will be in your best interest to stay ahead of this information. A
civil and criminal conspiracy allegation that involves this information will have dire
consequences to your major stakeholders and your
shareholders. As a courtesy I will promise to give you until the end of this week,
December 7, 2007 to review this material and perform any due diligence that you
seem worthy; and communicate a response. After that time, I will take it upon
myself to disclose this information as it pertains to Fulton Bank and Fulton Financial
Corporation to the Securities and Exchange Commission, and others that will help
protect my interests and the interests of the Advanced Media Group and my
litigation v. Fulton Bank. Respectfully, Advanced Media Group Stan J.
size=2>www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com Visit Our Blog Visit Our Video
Biography Copy to
file Deliver to Stephanie Carfley, Barley Snyder, LLC
 </DIV>
</DIV>
FAMILY: Verdana">Stanley J. Caterbone Advanced Media
FAMILY: Verdana">Supervisor Federal Bureau of
Investigation FBI Harrisburg Field
Office Harrisburg, PA 17108 Re: Visit on December 14,
FAMILY: Verdana">Dear Sir or
Madam: Last
Friday, December 14, 2007, I visited your office to review and make additional
complaints regarding my recent visits to your office. Unfortunately, I could not
remember the dates of our meetings. I could only leave with you a DVD containing
my complaint and evidence thereof. Fortunately for
your office, and me I have reviewed my records concerning my visits, calls, and
online complaints to your office, and the FBI at-large. You will find the records
attached. There may be more documented contacts and
complaints. For your review, I also attached
information regarding the Federal Tort Claims Act. Please proceed accordingly. Respectfully, Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Advanced
Media Group Attachment cc: file U.S. Senator Arlen
Specter </DIV>
</DIV>
Verdana"></DIV> 
LIPIAT AMICUS
<div style="text-align: justify; font-family: Verdana;">Stan J Caterbone Project

Hope Foundation Advanced Media Group 1250 Fremont
Street Lancaster, PA 17603 <div style="text-align: center;">IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER
COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION </div><div style="text-align:
center;">IN RE: : Docket No. CI-08-04741 MEGHAN .
LIAPPATT V : CD 6 208A </div><div style="text-align: center;">AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF A CLOSED
HEARING </div>TO THE HONORABLE, THE JUDGES OF THE SAID
COURT: AND NOW comes before the said court Stanley J. Caterbone, appearing
Pro Se, Project Hope Foundation, and Advanced Media Group, as Movant, to file an
Amicus in the above captioned case. The Movant has an interest in this
case as Project Hope being an advocate and a 501 (3) ( c ) non-profit foundation
focusing in mental health issues and mental health awareness; Stanley J. Caterbone
and Advanced Media Group having similar mental health issues before the courts
with a history and experience of how misaligned community attitudes towards
persons labeled with mental health problems can carry an unnecessary and costly
burden and stigma. This amicus provides a voice for the movants as well
as providing another perspective and opinion that should benefit the courts; the
parties; and the public-at-large. The matters presented in this amicus have a direct
relevancy in the disposition of this case as it does in the opinion and ORDER of
James P. Cullen of July 11, 2008 which ruled against a closed hearing. 
Stanley J. Caterbone appeared pro se before a 7303 Section 303 Of The
Pennsylvania Mental Health Procedures Act P.S. 7303 hearing in the Lancaster
General Hospital on April 7, 2006 and had a successful conclusion in arguing against
commitment and treatment. Stanley J. Caterbone was released after a 5-day
evaluation, which is also being challenged in the courts. July 21, 2008
 Respectfully Submitted: Stanley J.
Caterbone, Pro Se Project Hope Foundation Advanced Media
Group 1250 Fremont Street Lancaster, PA 17603 
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com <div style="text-align:
center;">TABLE OF
CONTENTS </div> 1. BACKGROUND OF MOVANTS
Page 3 a.
Stanley J. Caterbone b. Project
Hope c. Advanced Media Group 2.
PREFACE TO ISSUES BEFORE THE COURT Page 7 3.
ISSUES BEFORE THE COURT
Page 8 a.I) Should The Hearing On The Commonwealths Amended
Petition Under Section 304 Of The Pennsylvania Mental Health Procedures Act P.S.
7304 Is Open To The Public? b. II) Did The Court Give Due
Consideration To The Claims By Meghan Lippiatt Regarding Retaliation By The Public
During And After A Public Hearing On The Issues? 4. CONCLUSION
Page 11 5.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Page
12 6. EXHIBITS
Page 13 a. Jonathon Turley Post of December 13, 2007 Page
13 b. Biography of Jonathan Turley
Page 16 c. Conditional Release and Mandated
Outpatient Treatment By George F. Parker, M.D.
Page 29 d. Griffin PA,
Steadman HJ, Heilbrun K Page 22 e. A Look Behind the
Scenes of HIPAA and the Privacy Rule
Page 24 f. Federal Oversight
of Psychiatric Records: The Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act Page 28 g. More protections
for patients and psychologists under HIPAA
Page 33 BACKGROUND OF MOVANTS Stanley J. Caterbone
(CATERBONE) CATERBONE has been following very closely the case of
Meghan Lippiatt and was a witness to the trial on one of the few last days before
the Honorable Judge James P. Cullen in the Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas to hear the testimony of Psychiatrist Dr. Gotlieb of the Lancaster General
Hospital. CATERBONE had also written a response on the blog of nationally known
law expert and constitutional scholar Jonathan Turnley on December 19, 2007 days
after the conclusion of the trial. Jonathan Turley, like other national experts, had
posted an opinion on the Lippiatt case after the verdict and conclusion of the trial.
The response is EXHIBIT A. CATERBONE has been involved with Project
Hope Foundation for more than 10 years and has conducted extensive research in
the field of mental illness and has been an advocate for mental illness for almost 3
decades. Mental illness has been an issue in his family since the 1960s and has
been an extremely challenging dilemma resulting in the untimely and suspicious
deaths of two brothers in their 30s. His oldest brother died in Santa Barbara,
California on Christmas day of 1984 with the death being ruled a suicide, but now
known to have been a murder. In 1996 his youngest brother, Tom had committed
suicide and the circumstances are currently being litigated in the federal courts as a
wrongful death complaint. CATERBONE has researched and investigated the causes
of both deaths as it relates to the issue of mental illness and has conducted
research and investigations into his own malicious diagnosis of his own mental
health record. His father, Samuel, has a history of mental health records however;
he too has a history of psychic phenomena and a history of suspicious activities
with the United States Government and the Lancaster community. His mental
health record is also in dispute. He was a very successful businessman and had
served in the U.S. Navy as a radioman and graduated from gunner school with
honors. He also developed new technologies for the Dry Cleaning industry. He has
also conducted extensive research into areas concerning U.S. Government
activities. CATERBONE has developed relationships with mental
health professionals for his work with Project Hope and has been the main person
responsible for coordinating and administrating the mission of creating awareness
and education to the community-at-large with the distribution of Project Hopes
video Numbers Dont Lie; including to the Mental Health and Retardation
Department of the County of Lancaster this past year. CATERBONE has worked
extensively with Contact Lancaster, the Mental Health Alliance of Lancaster County,
and other mental health organizations as well faith based organizations.
CATERBONE had dealings with national professionals and organizations in the field;
especially since C. EvreTt Koop, the former U.S. Surgeon General and Tipor Gore
made mental health awareness a top priority in 1998. Tipor Gore also received the
Project Hope video for distribution as a resource for other non-profit organizations.
CATERBONES research includes national and local trends of suicides; symptomatic
behavior in bi-polar and manic depression; and the issues and stigma confronting
those affected with mental illnesses. CATERBONE brings a unique
perspective to the courts that may help to shed light into how people with mental
illnesses are treated unfairly by family, friends, and the community-at-large. It
should be noted that CATERBONE is also telepathic with a history of psychic traits in
his family dating back 2 generations. CATERBONE is currently engaged in extensive
litigation challenging his own mental health record, treatment, and diagnosis in
federal and state courts. His own mental health record includes 2 fabricated suicide
stories that are part of the record in hospitals and with police departments; this is in
addition to the 30 false arrests. Mental health and criminal records can be very
damaging in destroying a persons credibility and reputation and ultimately his
professional and personal life if not respected by all. CATERBONE is
presently the founder of Advanced Media Group and conducts his business from
Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. For the past several years, in addition to
appearing before the courts as a pro se litigator, Advanced Media Group has been
developing several business interests in the revitalization of downtown Lancaster,
Those projects include a downtown UPS Copy and Shipping Store; the Theater at
Hotel Brunswick; and the Excelsior Place Business Plan, In 2006
CATERBONE began his role as an Activist Shareholder for Fulton Financial, which is
listed as "FULT" on the NASDAQ stock exchange. As a founder of Financial
Management Group, Ltd., a full service financial firm, CATERBONE has drawn upon
the success in developing the strategic vision for his company and the experience
gained in directing the legal affairs and public offering efforts in dealing with Fulton
Financial. In 2005 CATERBONE, as a Pro Se Litigant filed several civil
actions as Plaintiffs that are in current litigation in the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States Third District Court of
Appeals, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, The Pennsylvania Superior Court, the
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, The Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster
County, Pennsylvania. These litigations include violations of intellectual property
rights, anti-trust violations, and interference of contracts relating to several
business interests. Central to this litigation is the Digital Movie, Digital Technologies,
Financial Management Group, Ltd,/FMG Advisory, Ltd., and its affiliated businesses
along with a Federal False Claims Act or Federal Whistleblowers Act regarding the
firm of International Signal and Control, Plc., (ISC) the $1Billion Dollar Fraud and the
Export violations of selling arms to South Africa and Iraq. This litigation dates back
to 1987. CATERBONE was a shareholder of ISC, and was solicited by ISC executives
for professional services. The Federal False Claims Act is currently part of RICO Civil
Complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, as docket no. 05-2288. A complete
biography and history is located on the website of Advanced Media Group
at: www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com PROJECT HOPE Project Hope Foundation was founded
in 1996 after the untimely suicide of Thomas P. Caterbone, brother of Stanley J.
Caterbone. Project Hope was initially formed by another brother, Dr. Phillip W.
Caterbone of Austin Texas, and other friends and relatives that wanted to continue
the legacy of Tom Caterbone and make a contribution to the community-at-large in
dealing with mental health issues and mental health awareness. In 1996
Project Hope Foundation produced the extremely successful instructional video
Numbers Dont Lie for helping teenagers deal with suicide and help them to
identify kids which may be at risk. The video was produced and directed by Dr. Phil
Caterbone & Psychologist Craig Crabtree, both of Austin, Texas. The video is a
approximately 20 minutes and is accompanied by an instructional workbook for the
monitors and a workbook for the students. "Numbers Don't Lie" has been sold to
the Texas School Board of Education to pay for its development and production.
The video has been provided to other Faith Based non-profit organizations, school
districts, church groups, and municipalities by CATERBONE and Advanced Media
Group over the past 10 years. The video can be viewed online at: <a style="font-
weight: bold; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 0);" target="_blank"
href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=olG_WGiMB8Y"
class="RE">www.advancedmediagroup.youtube.com</a> and clicking on the Numbers Dont Lie
video. Project Hope provided funding for the Mental Health Alliance of
Lancaster County, Contact/Lifeline of Lancaster (The 24/7 Suicide Hotline), The
Schreiber Pediatric Center, and other charitable organizations and faith based
charities. In 1999 Project Hope donated and constructed a soccer field on the new
Headquarters of the Schreiber Pediatric Center on Goods Road, in
Lancaster. Tom's Project Hope is funded by an annual golf tournament on
the 1st Saturday in August, called the Tommy Caterbone Memorial Golf
Tournament. The Lancaster County Mental Health/Mental Retardation
department is currently using the video as a resource Mental Health/Mental
Retardation Department. ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP In 1989 CATERBONE founded Advanced Media Group,
Ltd., which was one of only 4 or 65 U.S. domestic companies that had the capability
to manufacture CD-ROM's. Advanced Media Group also developed tools,
applications, and provided consulting to information technologies. Advanced Media
did business with commercial companies, government agencies, educational
institutions, and foreign companies including the Department of Defense; NASA,
National Institution of Standards & Technology (NIST); Department of Defense,
The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA); and the Defense
Mapping Agency, Central Intelligence Agency; (CIA), IBM; Microsoft, AMP;
Commodore Computers, American Bankers Bond Buyers; and a host of others. I also
was working with R.R, Donnelly's Geo Systems; which was developing various
interactive mapping technologies, which is now a major asset of Map Quest. Map
Quest is the premier provider of mapping software and applications for the Internet
and is often used in delivering maps and directions for Fortune 500 companies.
 Advanced Media Group now has interests in various business and fields
including the film and entertainment industries; information technologies;
revitalizations of downtown Lancaster; Research and Study in Mind Control and ESP;
and the fulfillment and distribution of past intellectual property assets. PREFACE TO ISSUES
BEFORE THE COURT Upon the verdict of the lower court trial of not
guilty by reason of insanity, CATERBONE posed the question of why a condition for
release of a psychiatric evaluation was not issued by presiding Judge James P.
Cullen. This is evident in the Jonathan Turley Post of December 19, 2007 which
states the following: Here is a brief synopsis; In the VERDICT ORDER
there did not seam to be any condition for Ms. Liappatt to be held in custody until a
further psychiatric evaluation could be performed. This set in motion a number of
court filings by the District Attorney, the Defense Counsel, and others trying to
recommit her to a treatment facility. There has been much research
done on the subject of conditional releases in not guilty by reason of insanity cases
throughout this country and most all have concluded that conditional releases are a
very acceptable and successful legal alternative to quell the public fear and
animosity of persons getting away with murder. In most cases the person is subject
to a variety of post verdict mental health treatment plans that may include
community participation until it can be proven by a certified psychiatrist that the
person no longer poses any threat to society before being released into the
community. ISSUES BEFORE THE
COURT 1. WETHER THE HEARING ON THE COMMONWEALTHS
AMENDED PETITION UNDER s SECTION 304 OF THE PENNSYLVANIA MENTAL HEALTH
PROCEDURES ACT P.S. 7304 IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. 2. DID THE COURT
GIVE DUE CONSIDERATION TO THE CLAIMS BY MEGHAN LIPPIATT REGARDING
RETALIATION BY THE PUBLIC DURING AND AFTER A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE
ISSUES. I) SHOULD THE HEARING ON THE COMMONWEALTHS AMENDED
PETITION UNDER SECTION 304 OF THE PENNSYLVANIA MENTAL HEALTH
PROCEDURES ACT P.S. 7304 IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC? Section 304 of the
Pennsylvania Mental Health Procedures Act P.S. 7304 7304. Court-
Ordered Involuntary Treatment Not To Exceed Ninety Days. (a) Persons for
Whom Application May be Made.-- 1. A person who is severely
mentally disabled and in need of treatment, as defined in section 301(a), may be
made subject to court-ordered involuntary treatment upon a determination of clear
and present danger under section 301(b)(1) (serious bodily harm to others), or
section 301(b)(2)(i) (inability to care for himself, creating a danger of death or
serious harm to himself), or 301(b)(2)(ii) (attempted suicide), or 301(b)(2)(iii) (self-
mutilation). 2. Where a petition is filed for a person already subject to
involuntary treatment, it shall be sufficient to represent, and upon hearing to
reestablish, that the conduct originally required by section 301 in fact occurred, and
that his condition continues to evidence a clear and present danger to himself or
others. In such event, it shall not be necessary to show the reoccurrence of
dangerous conduct, either harmful or debilitating within the past 30
days. (c) Procedures for Initiating Court-ordered Involuntary Treatment for
Persons Not in Involuntary Treatment.-- 1. Any responsible party may file a
petition in the court of common pleas requesting court-ordered involuntary
treatment for any person not already in involuntary treatment for whom application
could be made under subsection (a). 2. The petition shall be in writing
upon a form adopted by the department and shall set forth facts constituting
reasonable grounds to believe that the person is within the criteria for court-ordered
treatment set forth in subsection (a). The petition shall state the name of any
examining physician and the substance of his opinion regarding the mental
condition of the person. 3. Upon a determination that the petition sets
forth such reasonable cause, the court shall appoint an attorney to represent the
person and set a date for the hearing as soon as practicable. The attorney shall
represent the person unless it shall appear that he can afford, and desires to have,
private representation. 4. The court, by summons, shall direct the
person to appear for a hearing. The court may issue a warrant directing a person
authorized by the county administrator or a peace officer to bring such person
before the court at the time of the hearing if there are reasonable grounds to
believe that the person will not appear voluntarily. A copy of the petition shall be
served on such person at least three days before the hearing together with a notice
advising him that an attorney has been appointed who shall represent him unless
he obtains an attorney himself, that he has a right to be assisted in the proceedings
by an expert in the field of mental health, and that he may request or be made
subject to psychiatric examination under subsection (c)(5). 5. Upon
motion of either the petitioner or the person, or upon its own motion, the court may
order the person to be examined by a psychiatrist appointed by the court. Such
examination shall be conducted on an outpatient basis, and the person shall have
the right to have counsel present. A report of the examination shall be given to the
court and counsel at least 48 hours prior to the hearing. 6. Involuntary
treatment shall not be authorized during the pendency of a petition except in
accordance with section 302 or section 303. (e) Hearings of Petition for Court-
order Involuntary Treatment.--A hearing on a petition for court-ordered involuntary
treatment shall be conducted according to the following: 1. The person
shall have the right to counsel and to the assistance of an expert in mental health.
 2. The person shall not be called as a witness without his consent. 3.
The person shall have the right to confront and cross-examine all witnesses
and to present evidence in his own behalf. 4. The hearing shall be public
unless it is requested to be private by the person or his counsel. 5. A
stenographic or other sufficient record shall be made, which shall be impounded by
the court and may be obtained or examined only upon the request of the person or
his counsel or by order of the court on good cause shown. 6. The hearing
shall be conducted by a judge or by a mental health review officer and may be held
at a location other than a courthouse when doing so appears to be in the best
interest of the person. A decision shall be rendered within 48 hours after
the close of evidence. Under Section (e) 4. of the Section 304 of the
Pennsylvania Mental Health Procedures Act P.S. 7304 it clearly states the
following: The hearing shall be public unless it is requested to be private by
the person or his counsel. In Judge James P. Cullen ORDER and OPINION
of July 11, 2008 Judge Cullen appears to be abusing his discretion by mandating a
higher burden and threshold for showing good cause why Ms. Lippiatt is entitled to
her request of a closed hearing. It also appears that Judge Cullen is trying to pacify
the public interest and outcry when Meghan Liappitts was released at the
conclusion of her trial, which should have been addressed with a condition for
release, which Judge James P. Cullen failed to address in his VERDICT ORDER of
December 13, 2008. HIPAA
CONSIDERATIONS The privacy laws of health records addressed with
the passage if the Health Information Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) in
1996 may have some controlling interest in these matters. A summary of HIPAA is
as follows: A major upshot of the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 is a series of federal rules that have a
considerable impact on providers and patients their interactions, their rights, and
their responsibilities. In sorting through the details and compliance requirements of
the privacy rule in particular, it helps for practitioners to know something of the
historical and political context in which HIPAA and the rules that resulted from this
law took shape. Under HIPAA, Congress tasked the Department of Health
Human Services (HHS) with developing federal rules that govern how patient
records are handled, shared, and protected in the health care system. The
transactions rule, the first rule promulgated by HHS, provides for standard
formatting of electronic patient records for health care claims and other purposes.
This rule benefits health professionals by making it easier for them to work with
uniform rather than multiple claims forms. While more rules will follow, the 800-
pound gorilla of the series, the privacy rule, was finalized last April. The privacy
rule provides some important protections for psychology records, with provisions
that will impact the confidentiality of the psychologist-patient relationship.
 An Open Hearing would be placing mental health records in the public
domain and may be a violation of the rights of Ms. Lippiatt as defined in the HIPAA
code. The general public really has no interest in the process or the
Section 304 of the Pennsylvania Mental Health Procedures Act P.S. 7304 hearing, but
rather has an interest in the conclusion of the hearing in protecting itself from
someone whom may pose a danger or threat to others. That danger and or threat
to the community-at-large is not compromised nor is it supported by an open
hearing. That danger and or threat is only of importance and relevant if Ms. Lippiatt
is found to have a mental health illness and is not committed for treatment. The
question of an open or closed hearing is not relevant, only the conclusion of the
matters that will be presented to the courts. II) DID THE COURT GIVE DUE CONSIDERATION TO THE CLAIMS BY MEGHAN
LIPPIATT REGARDING RETALIATION BY THE PUBLIC DURING AND AFTER A PUBLIC
HEARING ON THE ISSUES? Stanley J. Caterbone has been subject
to an unprecedented history of retaliation and intimidation that has been the result
of a stigma due to his mental health record. Although this mental health records
validity and authenticity is being challenged in several courts, the stigma and
treatment by the community-at-large is real and can be used to substantiate Ms.
Lippiatts claim of retaliation in her opposition to an open hearing. Subjecting Ms.
Lippiatt to unnecessary intimidation and retaliation for information that would be
made public during an open hearing is of concern to all who may face similar
circumstances. Stanley J. Caterbone has a criminal record of some 30
false arrests in Lancaster County that would have never been possible without his
mental health record. Law enforcement relied upon the fact that Stanley J.
Caterbone had a history and mental health record to discredit him before the courts,
in his arrests, although he was successful in having those arrests and convictions
dismissed and overturned. Stanley J. Caterbone also must endure a
systematic and problematic attack of harassment in public that is also due to the
same mental health record and his fabricated and diminished reputation caused by
the same. The fact that Ms. Lippiatt was found not guilty by reason of
insanity of murdering her small children should compel the court to consider her
claims of retaliation more seriously. If the courts do no recognize the risks involved
to Ms. Lippiatt and others that may come before the courts in similar circumstances,
the courts should be compelled to provide the burden of proof that would be
considered in closing the hearing for the same said reasons. CONCLUSION 
The Lippiatt case is apparently precedent in the County of Lancaster of a person
being found not guilty by reason of insanity. That being the case, the court should
take extra precaution in protecting all parties in all related matters and should be
careful when reaching opinions and conclusion that will be precedent to future and
similar parties that will come before the courts. Judge Cullens ORDER
and OPINION of July 11, 2008 fails to protect the rights of Ms. Lippiatt and others
that may come before the courts, but does so unnecessarily. Closing the hearing to
the general public would not diminish the public interest, nor would it make the
general public safer. Only a conclusion of an involuntary commitment of Ms.
Lippiatt IF she does now possess a mental health illness that does pose a threat or
danger to others. July 21, 2008 Respectfully
Submitted: Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Project
Hope Foundation Advanced Media Group 1250 Fremont Street 
Lancaster, PA 17603 
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com CERTIFICATE OF
SERVICE Service was made on this 21st day of July 2008
upon the following by way of electronic mails; first class U.S. mails; or personal
delivery at the addresses set forth below: Kelley M. Sekula, Esq,
ADA Lancaster County District Attorney Office Lancaster County
Courthouse 50 N. Duke Street Lancaster, PA 17602 Julie M.
Cooper, Esq., For Meghan Liappitt Street: 222 South Market
Street Elizabethtown, pa 17022-2439 Phone: (717) 367-
1370 George C. Werner, Esq., For Lancaster Newspapers Barley
Snyder, LLC 126 East King Street Lancaster, PA 17602 Alspach
& Ryder (Ryder, Bruce P) 232 N Duke St Lancaster, PA 17602-
5205 Phone: (717) 393-3939 July 21, 2008 Respectfully
Submitted: Stanley J Caterbone, Pro Se Project Hope
Foundation Advanced Media Group 1250 Fremont Street 
Lancaster, PA 17603 
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com EXHIBIT A The
following can be viewed online at: http://jonathanturley.org And search on
LIPPIATT Pa. Woman Who Killed Her Two Children Found Not Guilty by
Reason of Insanity Published 1, December 11, 2007 Criminal law , Justice by
Jonathan Turley Meghan Lippiatt has been found not guilty by reason of
insanity in a Lancaster court. Lippiatt admitted suffocating her infant son and
drowning her 2-year-old son in 2004. The killing two-year-old Silas and his
four-month-old brother Miles occurred weeks after a break-up with her
husband. Lippiatt called 911 and told the operator: I did something really
bad, I just killed my kids. She later tried to kill herself and left a note which read: I
am sorry, I didnt want to hurt anyone. I am sorry, goodbye, please help me from
the grave. There is growing interest in allowing greater use of the
insanity defense after it was heavily curtailed after the shooting of President Ronald
Reagan. For a prior column on the insanity defense, click here For the
full story, click here Response to Pa. Woman Who Killed Her Two Children
Found Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity CATERBONE of Advanced Media
Group wrote: December 19, 2007 Dear Mr.
Turley, First of all I always look for your opinion when issues are looking
for expert constitutional scholars. I have been an avid learner of your opinion for
many, many years. Regarding this case, I dont know if you are aware, but
there was a problem and fiasco after the trial and wondered what your opinion was.
She was freed immediately after her bench trial upon a Habeas corpus filed by her
defense counsel. See the following news
account: http://local.lancasteronline.com/4/213886 Here is a
brief synopsis; In the VERDICT ORDER there did not seam to be any condition for
Ms. Liappatt to be held in custody until a further psychiatric evaluation could be
performed. This set in motion a number of court filings by the District Attorney, the
Defense Counsel, and others trying to recommit her to a treatment
facility. The following was my email to someone regarding my suspicion, I
have later found that temporary insanity, if in his verdict would free her
immediately after trial: December 18, 2007 To Ron Harper of
http://www.5thestate.com Are you following this case at all? This is truly
a first class Lancaster County smoke and mirrors game? This is my
analysis. And for the record, I did attend the trial and sat to hear Gottlieb, the
psychiatrist testify and be cross-examined. I have also studied mental health issues
for Project Hope, for my own case, and for my familys different cases, especially my
father and brothers Sam and Tom; for over 20 years. So I am not uneducated with
the issues. Being that this is the first such verdict of not guilty by reason
of insanity in Lancaster County, as reported, I think this whole case was purposely
mismanaged so that the next time such a verdict is before a Lancaster County jury,
they can say see, if you find the defendant not guilty by insanity, that person may
be released and freed without any treatment or conditions. I think Judge
Cullen should have to explain why he did not issue a condition in his verdict to have
Ms. Lippiatt held in Lancaster County Prison or transferred to a mental health facility
until the outcome of a psychiatric evaluation. I dont understand why he did not do
this, unless the law prevented him from doing that. I will have to research
this. I would love to hear your opinion, if you find the time. Hope to meet
you in the future. STAN J. CATERBONE Advanced Media Group
 <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;">EXHIBIT B Bio of JONATHAN TURLEY Professor
Jonathan Turley is a nationally recognized legal scholar who has written extensively
in areas ranging from constitutional law to legal theory to tort law. He has written
over three dozen academic articles that have appeared in a variety of leading law
journals at Cornell, Duke, Georgetown, Harvard, Northwestern, and other
schools. After a stint at Tulane Law School, Professor Turley joined the
George Washington faculty in 1990 and, in 1998, was given the prestigious Shapiro
Chair for Public Interest Law, the youngest chaired professor in the schools history.
In addition to his extensive publications, Professor Turley has served as counsel in
some of the most notable cases in the last two decades ranging, representing
whistleblowers, military personnel, and a wide range of other clients. These include
his representation of the Area 51 workers at a secret air base in Nevada; the nuclear
couriers at Oak Ridge, Tennessee; the Rocky Flats grand jury in Colorado; Dr. Eric
Foretich, the husband in the famous Elizabeth Morgan custody controversy; and four
former United States Attorneys General during the Clinton impeachment litigation.
In the Foretich case, Turley succeeded recently in reversing a trial court and striking
down a federal statute through a rare bill of attainder challenge. Professor Turley
has also served as counsel in a variety of national security cases, including
espionage cases like that of Jim Nicholson, the highest ranking CIA officer ever
accused of espionage. Turley also served as lead defense counsel in the successful
defense of Petty Officer Daniel King, who faced the death penalty for alleged spying
for Russia. Turley also served as defense counsel in the case of Dr. Tom Butler, who
is facing criminal charges dealing with the importation and handling of thirty vials of
plague in Texas. He also served as counsel to Larry Hanauer, the House Intelligence
Committee staffer accused of leaking a classified Presidential National Intelligence
Estimate to the New York Times. (Hanauer was cleared of all
allegations). Among his current cases, Professor Turley represents Dr. Ali
Al-Timimi, who was convicted in Virginia in 2005 of violent speech against the
United States. He also represents Dr. Sami Al-Arian, accused of being the American
leader of a terrorist organization while he was a university professor in Florida. He
also currently represents pilots approaching or over the age of 60 in their challenge
to the mandatory retirement age of the FAA. Turley has served as a consultant
on homeland security and constitutional issues, including the Florida House of
Representatives. Professor Turley is a frequent witness before the House
and Senate on constitutional and statutory issues as well as tort reform legislation.
Professor Turley is also a nationally recognized legal commentator. Professor Turley
was ranked as 38th in the top 100 most cited public intellectuals in the recent
study by Judge Richard Posner. Turley was also found to be the second most cited
law professor in the country. In 2008, he was ranked in a study of the nations
top 500 lawyers - one of only a handful of academics. In prior years, he was ranked
as one of the nations top ten lawyers in military law cases as well as one of the top
40 lawyers under 40. Professor Turleys articles on legal and policy issues
appear regularly in national publications with over 500 articles in such newspapers
as the New York Times, Washington Post, USA Today, Los Angeles Times and Wall
Street Journal. He is on the Board of Contributors of USA Today. In 2005, Turley was
given the Columnist of the Year award for Single-Issue Advocacy for his columns on
civil liberties by the Aspen Institute and the Week Magazine. Professor
Turley also appears regularly as a legal expert on all of the major television
networks. Since the 1990s, he has worked under contract as the on-air Legal
Analyst for NBC News and CBS News to cover stories that ranged from the Clinton
impeachment to the presidential elections. Professor Turley is often a guest on
Sunday talk shows with over two-dozen appearances on Meet the Press, ABC This
Week, Face the Nation, and Fox Sunday.Professor Turley teaches courses on
constitutional law, constitutional criminal law, environmental law, litigation, and
torts. He is the founder and exectuve director of the Project for Older Prisoners
(POPS). Professor Turley received his B.A. at the University of Chicago and
his J.D. at Northwestern. (In 2008, he was given an honorary Doctorate of Law from
John Marshall Law School for his contributions to civil liberties and the public
interest). For further information: Ms. Kristen Hilderbrand 202-994-
0537 <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;">EXHIBIT C Letters Conditional Release and
Mandated Outpatient Treatment George F. Parker, M.D. To the
Editor: In the thoughtful and stimulating article on mandated outpatient treatment
by Monahan and colleagues in the September 2001 issue (1), little mention was
made of the fairly substantial literature on mandated treatment of forensic
populations in the community. Conditional release has been used for decades as a
technique for managing the risks inherent in returning a person found not guilty by
reason of insanity to the community. Under conditional release, such
acquittees are released into the community with various conditions imposed; for
example, they are often required to live in specified housing and not to use illegal
drugs. They remain under the jurisdiction of a criminal judge or a central monitoring
agency, such as a psychiatric security review board. Adherence to mental health
treatment in the community is almost always a condition of release. As leverage,
this type of mandated community treatment uses both avoidance of jail and
avoidance of hospitalizationboth a brief jail stay and rehospitalization are possible
consequences of violation of the conditions of release, depending on the state.
 I recently conducted a thorough literature search, using PubMed and
manual strategies, on the topic of conditional release for persons found not guilty
by reason of insanity. I found more than 60 articles, including more than 30
published in the past ten years. Many of the earlier studies on conditional release
focused on the demographic characteristics of persons found not guilty by reason of
insanity. However, most of the articles on this subject for the past 30 years have
reported arrest rates and hospitalization rates of persons on conditional release. A
recent meta-analysis on this issue, based on statewide results from New York,
California, and Oregon, found estimated annual arrest rates to range from 3.4 to 7.9
percent, while the estimated annual hospitalization rates ranged from 14.5 to 25.8
percent (2,3). I recently presented a poster at the annual meeting of the American
Academy of Psychiatry and the Law showing that among persons receiving assertive
community treatment the annual arrest rate was 1.2 percent and the annual
hospitalization rate was 14.5 percent (4). In addition, some of the published reports
have included statistical models for factors that are predictive of the granting or
revocation of conditional release (5). The literature on conditional release
of persons found not guilty by reason of insanity thus may hold some of the answers
to the many questions about mandated community treatment posed by Monahan
and colleagues. In particular, the issues of the process of mandating treatment, the
outcomes of programsboth for the individual and for the systemthat do
mandate treatment, and the legal, ethical, and political questions that result from
mandating treatment in the community have all been discussed, to greater or lesser
degrees, in the conditional release literature over the past 30 years.
 Footnotes Dr. Parker is associate professor of clinical psychiatry at
Indiana University School of Medicine in Indianapolis. References 1.
Monahan J, Bonnie RJ, Appelbaum PS, et al: Mandated community treatment:
beyond outpatient commitment. Psychiatric Services 52:1198-1205,
2001[Abstract/Free Full Text] 2. Wiederanders MR, Bromley DL, Choate PA:
Forensic conditional release programs and outcomes in three states. International
Journal of Law and Psychiatry 20:249-257, 1997[CrossRef][Medline] 3. Harris
VL: Insanity acquittees and rearrest: the past 24 years. Journal of the American
Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 28:225-231, 2000[Medline] 4. Parker GF:
Low reoffense rate in a conditional release program. Poster presented at the annual
meeting of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, Boston, Oct 25-28,
2001 5. Callahan LA, Silver E: Factors associated with the conditional release of
persons acquitted by reason of insanity: a decision tree approach. Law and Human
Behavior 22:147-163, 1998[CrossRef][Medline] <hr style="width: 100%;
height: 2px;">EXHIBIT D 
 Griffin PA, Steadman HJ, Heilbrun K. Virginia Department of Mental Health,
Mental Retardation, and Substance Abuse Services, Richmond
23214. Monitored treatment in the community, also known as conditional
release, has been described as the most important advance in the treatment of
insanity acquittees in the last decade. Despite the importance of the development
of conditional release, however, there has been relatively little written about
relevant issues and planning principles important in designing and implementing
conditional release systems. The present paper discusses important considerations
relevant to conditional release that are associated with key decision points within
systems for persons found not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI). Four planning
principles, generalizable to all NGRI systems, are then presented in a way that
integrates the previous discussion. It is concluded that conditional release plays a
crucial role in the treatment of insanity acquittees and that mental health
administrators may either proactively modify their systems, in a way that balances
public safety with individual rights and treatment needs, or wait for the modification
mandate to be forced upon them in the wake of a highly publicized, heinous
offense. <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;">EXHIBIT E A Look Behind
the Scenes of HIPAA and the Privacy Ruleby Doug Walter, J.D.A major upshot of the
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 is a series of
federal rules that have a considerable impact on providers and patients their
interactions, their rights, and their responsibilities. In sorting through the details and
compliance requirements of the privacy rule in particular, it helps for practitioners
to know something of the historical and political context in which HIPAA and the
rules that resulted from this law took shape.Under HIPAA, Congress tasked the
Department of Health Human Services (HHS) with developing federal rules that
govern how patient records are handled, shared, and protected in the health care
system. The transactions rule, the first rule promulgated by HHS, provides for
standard formatting of electronic patient records for health care claims and other
purposes. This rule benefits health professionals by making it easier for them to
work with uniform rather than multiple claims forms. While more rules will follow,
the 800-pound gorilla of the series, the privacy rule, was finalized last April. The
privacy rule provides some important protections for psychology records, with
provisions that will impact the confidentiality of the psychologist-patient
relationship. The privacy rule may be divided into three parts. The provisions of the
first part address when and how patient records may be used and disclosed among
treating providers and to third parties. The second part provides patients with
certain rights regarding their records, such as the right to access and amend
records. The third part outlines administrative requirements that psychologists and
other health care professionals and entities must follow in using and disclosing
patient records.In essence, the privacy rule affords psychologists new protections
regarding the records of their patients, but it also requires psychologists to
proactively ensure the protection of records through certain administrative
requirements. These include, for example, providing patients with information about
their privacy rights, implementing procedures to ensure records privacy, and
securing records in offices.While the privacy rule includes some requirements
already contained in various state laws, some of the federal rules mandates are
new. The rule may be understood, however, as providing a national floor of
patient records protections upon which states may build further protections, since
Congress has specifically provided that state laws providing for greater records
protection will not be preempted by the federal rule.Some may question why a
federal privacy rule was promulgated in the first place, since many state laws
already protect the privacy of patient records. The short answer is that state laws
vary in the extent to which they protect patient records privacy, particularly mental
health records. A federal floor of protection provides a baseline uniformity of records
protection. The long answer is rooted in the history leading to promulgation of the
privacy rule.The Stage for Conflict Is SetHIPAA legislation and rulemaking, including
development of the privacy rule, have much to do with the emergence of managed
care organizations (MCOs) in the early 1990s as the primary payers for health care.
Unlike insurers in the fee-for-service system, MCOs began demanding broad access
to patient records for payment and administrative purposes. Patients and providers
balked and fought to keep sensitive personal information outside of the claims-
management process.By the mid 1990s, the insurance and business lobbies began
pitching to Congress that a uniform, electronic patient records system to
standardize health insurance claims processing, dubbed administrative
simplification, would save the health care system billions of dollars and relieve the
inefficiency and fragmentation in health care claims management. Insurers were
also looking for a federal law that legitimized their demands for broad access to
patient records. While organized psychology supported administrative simplification,
it could not come at a cost to records privacy. APA was at the forefront of
groups concerned that the onerous MCO demands for patient records disclosures
often for administrative purposes not directly related to patient care had eroded
confidentiality. Provider and patient organizations advocated for privacy and
security safeguards that would be needed if Congress were to mandate uniform
electronic claims processing. The stage for political conflict therefore was set by the
time President Clinton included both patient records privacy and administrative
simplification provisions in his Health Security Act of 1993, which failed to win
passage. The inclusion of these provisions shed light on the bitter fight brewing
between patients/providers and MCOs over control of records and foreshadowed the
rancorous congressional debate to come. The underlying conflict, which continues
to this day, was the force that shaped HIPAA law in general and the privacy rule
specifically.Battle Pits Provider Groups Against InsurersThe advocacy battle began in
earnest when Senator Robert Bennett (R-Utah) introduced the Medical Records
Confidentiality Act in late October 1995. The Practice Directorate was
concerned by the Bennett bills bipartisan co-sponsorship by powerful members of
Congress and by the strong support of insurers and other influential organizations.
The concern arose from APAs taking a careful look at the bills details. The
directorates analysis revealed substantial weaknesses in protecting the rights of
patients and providers with respect to the privacy of records. APA and allied groups
mobilized to prevent the Bennett bill from being included in broader health care
legislation that Congress also was seriously considering that fall. That broader
legislation eventually was enacted as HIPAA.A "Final" Rule Is Subject to ChangeThe
political battle between insurance and patient and provider organizations continues
to this day. President George W. Bushs Administration put the HIPAA privacy rule
into effect last April, though the rule itself gives HHS broad authority to make
changes until April 2002. Early in 2001, there were indications that the Bush
administration was considering gutting the rule, but officials backed down after
intense pressure from patient and provider advocacy groups. Despite the delay in
revising the rule, HHS has indicated that it will make changes sometime this spring.
The Administration can make even further refinements, though very limited, in the
final year before the compliance date for the privacy rule April 14, 2003.The
insurance and hospital lobby, faced with the compliance burden on large health
care facility providers, has requested changes to the privacy rule on several
occasions. The suggested revisions have focused mainly on patient consent
requirements and the assertion that the federal privacy rule should take precedence
over, or preempt, related state laws.From the APA Practice Organizations
perspective, such changes would weaken the patient protections afforded by the
federal privacy rule. Psychology and other mental health advocates, independently
and as part of the coalition known as the Mental Health Liaison Group (MHLG), have
countered the insurance lobby efforts by repeated calls for preserving the rules
privacy protections, and even expanding them. For example, the MHLG continues to
urge that the special privacy protection given to psychotherapy notes as defined
in the rule (see article on page 5) should be broadened to apply to other sensitive
information such as psychological testing data. For several months, the
directorates government relations staff worked to educate Congress and the public
about the need for a strong federal privacy bill, or at least a bill that would not
undermine existing state privacy laws that protected patients rights. APAs lobbying
push successfully countered the insurance industrys efforts to win inclusion of the
Bennett bill in HIPAA. In place of the Bennett bill, Congress incorporated a few
sentences into HIPAA to provide a timeline for action. Legislators gave themselves
three years, until August 1999, to enact a federal law governing records privacy and
further directed that HHS would establish a privacy rule within six months of
Congress failure to meet its deadline.Shortly after HIPAAs passage, it became
increasingly clear that the patient and provider lobbies and the insurance lobby
were entrenched in polar positions. APA assessed that Congress would not likely
pass legislation. While the association continued to advocate for appropriate privacy
legislation in Congress, APA began focusing efforts on the Administration in
anticipation of a rule from HHS. Organized psychology sought a rule that would
recognize the particular privacy requirements of records associated with mental
health treatment, including the need for heightened protection for psychotherapy
notes and other mental health records.Too Hot for Congress to HandleIndeed, the
privacy issue ultimately became too controversial for members of Congress to
handle, and HHS ended up proposing a federal privacy rule in November
1999. It looked like a compromise for both sides of the debate. Insurers
saw their broad access to records recognized in the proposed rule. At the same
time, consumers and providers had won strong protections for records each time
they were disclosed to insurers. Throughout 2000, APA worked to ensure that the
proposed rules strong patient protections were preserved in a final rule. Meanwhile,
the insurance lobby pushed to void the rule or at least substantially weaken its
protections. HHS released the final privacy rule in the last days of the Clinton
Administration in much the same form as the proposed rule. The Practice
Directorate considered the final rule a success, with qualification. For example, APA
reiterated in written comments to HHS that the privacy rule allowed insurers too
much access to records for administrative purposes not directly related to
treatment. It appeared the conflict and compromise characteristic of the legislative
and rulemaking processes was reflected in the final rule once it ultimately took
effect last April.The following chronology illustrates from 1993 through 2001 the
major events and players related to the HIPAA law and the final privacy rule from
HHS. <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;">EXHIBIT F Federal Oversight of Psychiatric Records: The
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act by Karen
Welch More than two years ago, I published an article on psychiatric
records in Mental Health World. This same article was included on one of the
Internet editions of MHW found on our website at www.mentalhealthworld.org.
Since publishing that article, each month, I receive at least one email asking
questions about confidentiality and access to psychiatric records. The previous
MHW article on psychiatric records specifically addressed access to records and
confidentiality under New York State law. Since that article was written, the federal
government has created regulations under the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act (HIPAA) which deal explicitly with access and confidentiality of all
health care records. The present article will summarize some of the main provisions
of these regulations as they relate to the confidentiality and access of psychiatric
records. It will also note how the HIPAA regulations differ from New York Law.
 The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act was passed by
Congress in 1996. Final regulations regarding the privacy provisions of this law
were issued by the Bush administration in August 2002 and will become effective in
April 14, 2003. These regulations provide a comprehensive set of rules for the
confidentiality and access to all health records. Since this is a federal law, it affects
everyone in the United States. The HIPAA privacy regulations supersede any state
law, to the extent that they provide greater protections than state law. However if a
states law provides greater privacy protections than HIPAA, then the states rules
apply. General Provisions of
HIPAA HIPAA greatly expands the entities which must keep psychiatric
records confidential. Entities which are covered by the requirements of HIPAA
include health care providers, health plans and health care clearinghouses that
transmit or maintain any health information via electronic media. The definition of
health plans includes group health plans, health insurance issuers, HMOs, Medicaid
programs, Medicare programs and long-term care policies. Additionally, the law
requires that business associates of covered entities which perform services
involving the use or disclosure of protected health information must enter into an
agreement to safeguard the privacy of the protected health information.
 HIPAA also greatly expands the types of information that are protected. With a
few narrow exceptions, HIPAA applies to all individually identifiable health
information in any form held or transmitted by a covered entity. Individually
identifiable means that it is information from which a person can identify the person
to whom it relates. The information is covered whether it is oral or recorded. It also
does not matter if it was created by a health care provider, health plan, public
health authority, employer, life insurer, school or university or health care
clearinghouse. The information may relate to past, present or future physical or
mental health or condition of an individual, the provision of health care to an
individual or the past, present or future payment of health care to an individual.
 In contrast, under the New York Mental Hygiene Law, a clinical record
means any information covering or relating to the examination or treatment of a
patient or client maintained by the facility which has treated or is treating such
patient or client. Under the New York Mental Hygiene Law, privacy protections
apply to facilities that are operated or licenced by the New York State Office of
Mental Health. Additionally, the law requires that disclosure of these records to
third parties places the third party under an obligation to maintain confidentiality.
 For consumers of mental health services, the expansion of privacy
protections found in HIPAA is welcome. Often, individuals would successfully seal
their clinical records under New York law only to be thwarted by the fact that
insurers or health information clearinghouses had created their own records which
were not subject to the confidentiality provisions of New York law. Under HIPAA, the
likelihood of this problem is substantially decreased since these entities must now
maintain strict confidentiality or face the penalties under the law. Access By
Individuals to Their Own Records HIPAA creates a general right for an individual
to access his or her own health records subject to a number of exceptions.
Additionally, the comments to the regulations state that individuals have a right of
access to information used to make health care decisions or determine whether an
insurance claim will be paid. The four exceptions to the general right of access to
records are: 1) psychotherapy notes; 2) information compiled in
reasonable anticipation of, or use in, a civil, criminal or administrative action and
proceeding; 3) where access is prohibited by the Clincial Laboratory
Improvements Amendments of 1988: or 4) records that are exempt under the
regulations of the Clinical Laboratory Improvements Amendment. The Clinical
Laboratory Improvements Amendments of 1988 is an act which forbids laboratories
doing tests on human specimens to disclose the results to anyone except the
individual or entity who requested the test. The definition of
psychotherapy notes is notes recorded in any medium by a health care provider
who is a mental health professional documenting or analyzing the contents of a
conversation during a private counseling session or a group, joint, or family
counseling session. Psychotherapy notes are intended to refer to a mental health
professionals own personal notes of a therapy session. Notes do not count as
psychotherapy notes unless they are kept separately from the patients medical
chart. Reviewable Denial of Access to
Records Under HIPAA, other than the unreviewable reasons discussed
below, the right of a patient to see his own chart can be restricted in only three
circumstances. Each of these circumstances is reviewable by an appeal
process. First, a licensed health care professional may deny access if in
the exercise of his professional judgement it is determined that such access is
reasonably likely to endanger the life or physical safety of the individual or other
person. Under this reason for denial, covered entities may not deny the access on
the basis of the sensitivity of the health information or the potential for causing
psychological or emotional harm. A health care professional must find that the
individual has exhibited suicidal or homicidal tendencies and that access to the
records would reasonably result in murder, suicide or other physical violence.
 Second, there is a reviewable exception when the requested information
relates to another person (other than the health care provider) and in the
professional judgement of the licensed health care professional, the access would
likely cause substantial harm to such person. Third, if the personal
representative of an individual makes the request rather than the individual himself,
the request may be denied if the provision of access to records to the personal
representative is reasonably likely to cause substantial harm to the individual or
other person. This scheme is somewhat different from that found in the
New York Mental Hygiene Law. Under New York law, the treating practitioner may
review the information requested. If after consideration of all factors, the
practitioner determines that the requested review could reasonably be expected to
cause substantial and identifiable harm to the patient, client or others, the facility
may deny access to all or a part of the record and may grant access to a prepared
summary of the record. Unreviewable Denial of Access to Records. Under
HIPAA, there are five areas where an entity may deny access to records without an
opportunity for review of this denial. The areas are: 1) the exceptions to the
right of access described above 2) the request of a prison inmate to see
his records if obtaining such copy would jeopardize the health, safety, security,
custody or rehabilitation of the prisoner or other inmates or the safety of the
correctional staff. 3) if the protected health information is contained in records
subject to the Privacy Act; 4) the information was obtained from someone
other than a health care provider under a promise of confidentiality and the access
would be reasonably likely to reveal the source of the information. 5) a
research subjects request to see his records during research, if the consent form for
the research advised that access to records would be suspended during research
and the patient signed the consent form. Process of Review of Denial of
Access The review of a denial of the access is to be conducted by a
health care professional designated by the covered entity. This professional may
not have been directly involved in the original denial of the request for access. The
review must be conducted in a reasonable time period but the regulations do not
impose deadlines on any entity. There is no provision for judicial review of this
denial. New Yorks review procedure for a denial of access appears to be
more helpful to consumers. Under the New York Mental Hygiene Law, if access to a
psychiatric record is denied, a patient has the right to appeal for review by the
Clinical Records Access Review Committee. A client must be notified by the facility
of his right to a review of the denial by the appropriate clinical record access review
committee. If the client requests this review, the facility must within ten days of
the request, transmit the record to the chairman of the appropriate committee with
a statement setting forth the specific reasons access was denied. If access is
denied by the records access review committee, a patient has a right to seek
judicial review of this denial. Court review must be commenced within 30 days of
receiving notification of the committee decision. Procedure for Correcting Records Under HIPAA, an
individual has the right to have a covered entity amend protected health
information or records about the individual in a designated record set. An
individuals request for amendment may be denied if the health information or
record: 1) was not created by the covered entity; 2) is not part of the
designated record set; 3) would not otherwise be available for inspection by
the individual; 4) is accurate and complete. An individual should
make a request for the amendment in writing. The entity may require [that omit
DN] the individual to provide reasons to support a requested amendment to a
record. An entity must act on the request within 60 days of the request for an
amendment although this time may be extended once for 30 days if it notifies the
individual in writing of the reasons for the delay. If the entity agrees to
make the amendment to the consumers record it must do so and make a
reasonable effort to inform others about the amendment including persons
identified by the consumer as having the information and any persons that are
known by the entity to have the records. If the entity denies the consumers
request to amend the record, the entity must provide a timely written denial. The
consumer can then submit a written statement disagreeing with the denial. This
information must be appended to the record and included in any future disclosure.
 Under the New York Mental Hygiene Law, an individual may challenge the
accuracy of the information maintained in his clinical record and may require that a
brief
w
itten statement prepared by him concerning the challenged information be inserted
into the clinical record. This statement shall become part of the permanent part of
the record and shall be released whenever the clinical record at issue is released.
The information to be challenged shall be only factual statements and shall not
include a providers observations, inferences or conclusions. For
information concerning access to records, confidentiality or sealing of records, or for
other questions concerning the mental health laws, please contact the PAIMI
(Protection and Advocacy for the Mentally Ill) program at Neighborhood Legal
Services, 716/847-0650. Sources Stefan, Susan, Q&A, What
effect do the recently promulgated HIPAA regulations on privacy of records have for
the rights of my clients to access their own records?, Center for Public
Representation, August 2002 Clemens, Jane F., New Federal Regulations
Expand Protections For Privacy of Health Records, New York State Bar Journal,
June 2002. Flannery, John, Paley, Eric, and Roland, M.K. Gaedecke, With HIPPA
deadlines on horizon, whats required?, Buffalo Law Journal, September 26,
2002 <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;">EXHIBIT G More protections for patients and psychologists under HIPAA
 HIPAA's
psychotherapy notes provision safeguards sensitive patient information.
 BY JENNIFER DAW HOLLOWAY Monitor
staff Though the mention of the Health Information Portability and
Accountability Act (HIPAA) privacy rule compliance date--April 14--can make some
psychologists anxious, most applaud the new law for increasing privacy protections.
 Especially interesting to practitioners is the psychotherapy notes
provision, says Russ Newman, PhD, JD, APA's executive director for practice. The
provision recognizes that certain kinds of mental health information need to be
protected more than other types of information. Under HIPAA, psychotherapy notes
are defined as "notes recorded in any medium by a mental health professional
documenting or analyzing the contents of conversation during a private counseling
session." These notes, which capture the psychologist's impressions about the
patient and can contain information that is inappropriate for a medical record, are
similar to what psychologists have historically referred to as "process notes."
 HIPAA affords psychotherapy notes more protection--most notably from
third-party payers--than they'd been given in the past. Under HIPAA, disclosure of
psychotherapy notes requires more than just generalized consent; it requires
patient authorization--or specific permission--to release this sensitive information.
And, whereas in the past insurance companies have requested entire patient
records--including psychotherapy notes--in making coverage decisions, now health
plans cannot refuse to provide reimbursement if a patient does not agree to release
information covered under the psychotherapy notes provision. "In the
past, patients could refuse to have this type of information released, but then the
company might refuse to cover services," notes Newman. "The HIPAA privacy rule
protection stops that kind of practice from taking place." Psychologists
take note The privacy rule gives rights to health professionals, as well as to
their patients. Under the new law, psychologists can decide whether to release their
psychotherapy notes to patients, unless patients would have access to their
psychotherapy notes under state law (see the article about HIPAA and state laws in
last month's Monitor). Though the privacy rule does afford patients the right to
access and inspect their health records, psychotherapy notes are treated differently:
Patients do not have the right to obtain a copy of these under HIPAA. And when a
psychologist denies a patient access to these notes, the denial isn't subject to a
review process, as it is with other records. There is a catch in the
psychotherapy notes provision. HIPAA's definition of psychotherapy notes explicitly
states that these notes are kept separate from the rest of an individual's record. So,
if a psychologist keeps this type of information in a patient's general chart, or if it's
not distinguishable as separate from the rest of the record, access to the
information doesn't require specific patient authorization. According to the
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), it makes good sense to keep the
notes separate since this type of information should not be available automatically.
 This may, says Newman, be a practical difference from the way some
psychologists have previously stored patient information. But, "if psychologists want
higher protections for psychotherapy notes, then they should keep the information
separate," he urges. Daniel Abrahamson, PhD, professional affairs
coordinator for the Connecticut Psychological Association, adds that psychologists
"shouldn't jump the gun." Keeping records separate is an option and "each
practitioner will need to determine whether the benefits of maintaining extra
protection outweigh keeping the records distinctly separate from medical records,"
he says. In other words, some psychologists may decide that, for some patients, the
information doesn't particularly need the extra level of protection. If a particular
treatment evolves and the psychologist wants to keep the psychotherapy notes
separate, he or she can choose to do that. "It's part of good clinical judgment," says
Abrahamson. "In the past, clinicians didn't include some information in a record and
therefore wouldn't be able to later document that information. Now they have the
option to include detailed content in separate notes." In addition to
keeping these notes separate from other patient information, psychologists should
be aware, says Newman, that there are certain parts of a record that are expressly
not considered psychotherapy notes--and that don't require patient authorization for
disclosure--under the HIPAA privacy rule. This information includes medication
prescription and monitoring, counseling session start and stop times, modalities and
frequencies of treatment, results of clinical tests, and any summary of diagnosis,
functional status, treatment plans, symptoms, prognosis or progress. This
portion of the rule is likely to leave some "potential for interpretation," says
Newman. "What if a managed-care company says it needs a summary of the
themes from psychotherapy sessions? They may say that's outside the
psychotherapy notes provision. We'd argue that divulging themes of the
conversations in psychotherapy is tantamount to giving away the whole
conversation," he says. In the same vein, testing information, like
summary information, isn't included under psychotherapy notes. APA submitted
comments to HHS on both the proposed and final rules asking that psychological
test data be included in the provision. Disclosing this type of information, says
Newman, could divulge intimate details about a patient much like the information
from psychotherapy sessions. Unfortunately, he says, HHS declined to expand the
definition. Despite the exclusion of certain information, however, the
psychotherapy notes provision should be heralded "as a significant victory for
privacy advocates," says Nanci Klein, PhD, professional affairs coordinator for the
Utah Psychological Association. "Practitioners have long found it onerous to have to
release psychotherapy notes for additional treatment authorization by managed-
care companies." Now, she says, managed-care companies are only entitled to
certain types of information, not including psychotherapy notes. "I think
this defines the psychologist as the treating expert whose professional analysis and
opinion represent the core information necessary for making judgments about the
necessity for continued treatment," she adds. This article is the second in
a three-part series on HIPAA topics. The next piece, on HIPAA's minimum necessary
requirement, will appear in March. </div> 
AMICUS CURIEA BRIEF NSA
<div style="text-align: justify;"><div style="text-align: center; font-weight:

bold;">UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION </div> American
Civil Liberties Union, American Civil Liberties
Union Foundation; American Civil Liberties Union
of Michigan; Council on American-
Islamic Relations; Counsel on American-
Islamic Relations Michigan; Greenpeace,
Inc.; National Association of Criminal
Defense Lawyers; James Bamford; Larry
Diamond; Christopher Hitchens; Tara McKelvey;
and Barnett R. Rubin, Plaintiffs v. National
Security Agency/ Central Security Service, and
Lieutenant General Keith B. Alexander, in
his official capacity as Director of the
National Security Agency and Chief of the
Central Security Service, Defendants : : Case No.
2006-cv-2095 : Case No. 2006-cv-
style="font-family: Verdana;">: : Honorable Anna
Diggs Taylor : :<div style="text-align: center;">BRIEF ON BEHALF OF
AMICI CURIAE STANLEY J. CATERBONE and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION
FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT </div> Date: February 20, 2007
style="font-family: Verdana;">Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se
Litigant 220 Stone Hill Road Conestoga,
PA 174516 717-427-1821
facsimile amgroup01@msn.com TABLE OF
CONTENTS I. STATEMENT OF INTEREST OF
AMICUS CURIAE Page 3 II. BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF AMICI
CURIAE STANLEY J. CATERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA
Page 5 III. ARGUMENT Page 21 STATEMENT OF
INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE Stanley J.
Caterbone is a private citizen and the majority shareholder of the United States
incorporated business Advanced Media Group. Stanley J. Caterbone was a
whistleblower and shareholder in 1987 involving the United States Defense
Contractor International Signal & Control, Plc., known as ISC. In 1992,
International Signal & Control was indicted and found guilty of among other
things a Billion Dollar Fraud and export violations concerning illegally shipping
cluster bomb technologies, missile defense systems, and other defense systems to
foreign interests including South Africa, Iraq and Saddam Hussein. Cluster bombs
and related technologies are known to have been exported to Iraq by the Chilean
Arms Dealer Carlos Cardoen, a joint venture partner of International Signal &
Control. The Central Intelligence Agency is confirmed to have been involved in a
covert program to arm Iraq during the 1980s with close ties to International Signal
& Control, which allegedly included the help of the National Security Agency, a
former end user of International Signal & Control technologies under the early
1980s program Project X. A Presidential Finding in 1984 by the Bush Administration
was executed to implement the program of arming Saddam Hussein and Iraq with
the cluster bomb technologies. Serious allegations of these programs were the
focus of investigations that included the knowledge and supervision of then
appointed nominee for the Director of Central Intelligence Agency, Robert M.
Gates. Since 1987,
Stanley J. Caterbone has been the victim of vast civil conspiracy that started in
1987 to cover-up allegations of fraud within International Signal & Control
during the negotiations and merger of International Signal & Control and
Ferranti International of England. Stanley J. Caterbone alleges that warrantless
surveillance was used to obstruct justice and moot his constitutional rights in an
effort to divert attention away from his allegations of fraud within International
Signal & Control back in 1987, and afterwards to the present as a means to
deny his access to the courts for remedy and relief, and Federal False Claims Act
violations. The business of Advanced Media Group has been greatly compromised
and intellectual property stolen during the late 1980s and early 1990s that
included information technology contracts with the United States
Government. In January
of 2006, Stanley J. Caterbone was detained at every airport security check point,
which was during a policy of random checks, and taken out of line during travel
from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to Houston, Texas, and on to Puerto Vallarta,
Mexico. At the Houston Airport, Stanley J. Caterbone was falsely accused of carrying
plastics explosives and taken to an interview room by Homeland Security officials.
Stanley J. Caterbone was also detained for three days in Mexico, and was not
provided with an opportunity to gain access to a flight out of the country by Mexican
Officials. The interest of
amicus in this case is ensuring that constitutional rights of private citizens are not
compromised and justice subverted through information obtained from warrantless
surveillance upon which there is no just cause for any allegations or association with
terrorism. Whistle-Blowers are inherently supportive of a system of checks and
balances within our government that go beyond our constitutional doctrines
regarding the same. Whistle-Blowers ensure that the rule of law is universally applied to all
government officials in all branches of government. The Federal False Claims Act
and its provisions protect individuals from abuse of power, while providing relief and
remedies for those that were wronged and those that had the courage to cite a
wrong. It is too easy for
present and future administrations to abuse their power and utilize warrantless
surveillance as a means of subverting and obstructing justice for those that are
engaged in Whistle-Blowing cases that concern National Security. Without the
proper oversight and judicial review, a Whistle Blower can be place on terrorist lists
for malicious reasons without the knowledge or just cause. This is in direct conflict
with keeping our democracy free of corruption while adhering to the spirit of the
constitution in the manner our founding fathers envisioned. BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF AMICUS CURIAE Background Information: The following
transcripts from National Broadcast Television, ABC News Nightline and ABC News
20/20; provide material information as to the activities of International Signal &
Control and the importance of these matters with regard to National
Security. ABC NEWS 20/20 FEBRUARY 1, 1991 [Lynn Sherr
ABC News 20/20 Correspondent] This is the story of how this deadly weapon,
designed for the U.S. military made its way form this country to Iraq. And how
American Soldiers may face the devastation of a cluster bomb if a ground war
breaks out in the Persian Gulf. Federal Officials believe Saddam Hussein got his
arsenal thru a lethal combination bureaucratic foul ups in the U.S. Government
and simple greed. Here is how the cluster bomb works. An artillery shell, an airplane, or a
rocket launcher sends to bombs toward their targets. Each bomb carries hundreds
of smaller bomlets, something like hand grenades. Cluster bombs can be used
against ground troops or tanks, and can even scatter mines to lie dormant for days.
The bombs can spray thousands of pounds of sharp objects pins or even razor
blades. The shrapnel can rip through anyone or anything in its way, causing
massive casualty among civilians or ground troops. You can see the destruction in
these buildings in Lebanon after a cluster bomb attack. How did Iraq obtain the cluster
bombs and the ability to make their own? It was incredibly simple. Investigators
believe it started with International Signal & Control, A government contractor
with 5,000 employees based in Pennsylvania, which build key components of cluster
bombs in a subsidiary in California. 20/20 has learned Federal Investigators believe
ISC provided the technology, that is the plans, to this man, Carlos Cardoen, Chilean
arms dealer. Authorities believe he used the plans to build the cluster bombs in
Chile, then he shipped them to Iraq. Whats wrong with all this? If the cluster bomb technology
actually left the county, that is illegal without U.S. Government permission,
investigators say ISC never got. It is also illegal for a foreigner, like Cardoen, to take
the plans out of the United States without a license, which sources tell us, he never
obtained. The man who opened the door to Iraq for Cardoen, was this man Nasser
Bedouin. He is a Lebanese born middleman for Cardoen who is based in the United
States. Bedouin traveled often to Bagdad, and arranged for sale cluster bombs and
other military hardware to Saddam Husseins army. In his first television interview,
he told us about the business of dealing in deadly weapons. [Nasser Bedouin, Arms Dealer] I
can sell you a knife to peel an apple, if you cut someones throat, thats your
business. Weapons do not kill, who behind them kill. [Lynn Sherr ABC News 20/20
Correspondent] With slick promotional videos, Cardoen marketed his arms
throughout the world. Arab countries were favorite customers. [Cardoen Marketing Video] Each
one of the bomblets of the cluster bomb is multi purpose and contains an
incendiary, anti personnel and anti armor detection.<br
Correspondent] This letter from Cardoen authorizes Bedouin to sell cluster bombs
to Saddam Hussein during his war with Iran. This letter says Cardoens company is
willing to take its share in helping Iraq in its time of need. We can provide you with
our cluster bombs at the lowest possible price. According to these contracts the sale
of cluster bombs to Iraq was an extremely lucrative business. February 24, 2984
3,000 cluster bombs sent to Saddam Husseins army worth $21 million dollars. A
few months later, another 3,000 cluster bombs, another $21 million dollars. The
supply of cluster bombs eventually totaled more than $400 million dollars. In fact,
Bedouin is suing his former boss for commission payments. According to Bedouin, Cardoen not
only sold the bombs produce in Chile to Saddam Hussein, he actually set up a
factory near Bagdad. So the Iraq President could mass-produce his own cluster
bombs. That was one of the first attacks by the military when the attack began. Its
unknown whether that plant is totally out of commission. [Nasser Bedouin, Arms Dealer] He
set up a factory to manufacture the cluster bomb. Um, ah later stage for the fuses.
And this is a complete project. I mean its completer from raw material to finished
product. Because the purpose in Iraq is to have control over the weaponry they
have put in their strategy. [Lynn Sherr ABC News 20/20 Correspondent] Federal Investigators are
now trying to bring Carlos Cardoen to justice. But why didnt they find out about him
sooner? He has been selling cluster bombs to Iraq for nearly a decade. The U.S.
Patent Office knew about Cardoen back in 1986. But they didnt tell anyone else in
the Federal Government about them. In a move that went apparently unchecked in
the highest levels of the government, Cardoen applied for his own patent for cluster
bombs in 1986. Based on some changes on previous designs, he received the
patent two years later. Getting the Patent is not illegal. But at a time when U.S. shipments
of arms to Chile were banned, as to all sales to Iraq, Why didnt the Patent Office
raise any questions why was this foreigner dealing in U.S. arms?
Verdana;">Experts say
bureaucratic infighting regularly causes such lapses. The Departments of
Commerce,
State, and Defenne, are supposed to control arms sales, and communicate with one
another. [Anthony
Cordazman, Correspondent] - Even today, the same squabbling goes on, every day
within the Commerce, State, and Defense. The Administration can never agree on
what kinds of laws can be passed to correct this. [Lynn Sherr ABC News 20/20 Correspondent] Carlos
Cardoen denied our requests to speak on camera. In an interview last year, he
denied he did anything wrong. And as long as a human being is an animal that needs to defend
himself, weapons are going to exist. I think that is wrong. As a human being I
believe that weapons are wrong. But they are a fact. And we have to live with
facts. The former head
of ISC, James Guerin, who dealt with Chilean, said he did not provide anything to
Cardoen to build weapons. But Nasser Bedouin tells a different
story. [Nasser Bedouin,
Arms Dealer] I believe that Dr. Carlos Cardoen got the plans to build the cluster
bombs from the United States. [Lynn Sherr ABC News 20/20 Correspondent] Questions about
the cluster bombs come at a time when questions are being focused on how so
many American designed weapons got into the hands of Saddam Hussein. Senator
John McCain. [Senator
John McCain] Theres not just one Saddam Hussein on this globe. Theres lots and
lots of them who at this time as we speak are acquiring technologies to give them
the capabilities of weapons of mass destruction because its a way of gaining
victory on the cheap. [Lynn Sherr ABC News 20/20 Correspondent] McCain has introduced
legislation that would severely penalize and company or countries that would sell
weapons illegally or harbor arms dealers. [Senator John McCain] To provide many of the kinds of weapons
that we have today to many nations, which are clearly offensive in nature, and are
clearly far exceed their requirements to defend themselves, is frankly
unconscionable and must be brought to a stop. [Lynn Sherr, ABC News 20/20 Correspondent]
Basically what you are saying is hit them in the pocketbook. [Senator John McCain] Hit them in
the pocketbook and public exposure. No corporation or nation likes to be branded as
a nation that is involved in this illicit trafficking. [Lynn Sherr ABC News 20/20 Correspondent] But
public exposure and pressure will not shield American Soldiers. If Saddam Hussein
uses the cluster bombs he already has. [Senator John McCain] And if there is one good thing that has
come out of this Persian Gulf war its to dramatically heighten the awareness of the
people of the world to the American people of how dangerous this proliferation of
weapons of mass destruction can be. [Hugh Downs, ABC News 20/20 Correspondent] God those
things are vicious. Have there been any indictments yet Lynn?<br
Correspondent] Ah, no Hugh, no indictments yet. Carlos Cardoen has not been
indicted, even though Federal Agents raided his headquarters office in Miami. And
U.S. Customs people took a number of documents, but no indictments yet, but there
are investigations going on. [Hugh Downs, ABC News 20/20 Correspondent] If these things are
dropped from airplanes, and we have air supremacy, as it now has been said by our
leaders, is there that much to worry about for our troops?<br
Correspondent] Were told yes, because you dont need to an airplane to a cluster
bomb, they can also be used on rocket launchers and on unguided missiles, both of
which Iraq has. And incidentally, we talked about that bomb factory, even if it was
badly damaged, the cluster bomb factory he already has, were told in three to six
months it can be operational again, and anyway he likely has a big
stockpile. [Hugh Downs, ABC
News 20/20 Correspondent] We of course, have these weapons also, and I
understand they are called something different? [Lynn Sherr ABC News 20/20 Correspondent] Yes, if
youre listening to a Pentagon Briefing, dont listen for the term cluster bomb, there
calling them Aerial Denial Weapons. [Hugh Downs, ABC News 20/20 Correspondent] Thank you
Lynn. END ABC News Nightline -
September 12, 1991 [Ted Koppel] incidentally the
function of the senior review panel is to advise one man, the director of central
intelligence. And at least part of the period in question there was an acting director
of the CIA Robert Gates. Well attempt to pull some of these threads together
when we come back. Commercial Break [Ted Koppel]
When all is said and done, why should your or your representatives in Congress
care, eventually after all President Bush spoke and acted against Sadaam Hussein
more forcefully than anyone could have expected. [Former President George H. Bush Speech] Were
dealing with Hitler revisited, a totalitarianism, a brutality, that is neglect and
unprecedented in modern times. [Vidoe-Gary Milhollin, Director, The Wisconsin Project] The more
we gave Sadaam, the more dangerous he got. And ultimately we had to go to war to
destroy what we sold him. [Ted Koppel] But its not a question of holding the Bush or Reagan
Administrations to account for having made mistakes with regards to their policies
toward Iraq The issue is how those policies were
implemented. As we
reported over the past few months, The Atlanta Branch of an Italian Bank, BNL, was
able to funnel $Billions, some of it in U.S. Credits to Iraqs Military Procurement
Network. The U.S. Government knew, and turned a blind eye. Sophisticated Military
Technology was illegally transferred from a major U.S. company in Lancaster,
Pennsylvania (International Signal & Control), to South Africa, and Chile, and
from there onto Iraq. The Iraqi borne designer of a chemicals weapons plant in
Lybia, set up shop in Florida, producing and shipping to Iraq chemical weapon
components. The CIA, FBI, and other U.S. agencies were made aware of the
operation and did nothing to prevent it. During the 1980s and into the 90s senior officials of both the
Bush and Reagan Administration encouraged the privatization of foreign policy,
certainly towards Iran and Iraq. The policy may have had merit - but there werent willing or in
some instances werent successful in fighting it out in Capital Hill so they found
other ways. They made a mockery of the Export Control System, and they found
ways of encouraging foreign governments to do what our laws prohibited. They
even knew or if not were guilty of the grossest incompetence that U. S. companies
were collaborating with foreign Arms merchants in the illegal transfer of American
Technology that helped Sadaam Hussein build is formidable
arsenal. This week, the CIA
again told ABC News Nightline that our allegations over the past few months
regarding covert operations to supply Iraq with U.S. Arms and weapons technologies
simply were not true. The CIAs Inspector General said a statement from the Agency [On
Screen] - Has found to factual support whatsoever for such an operation or for
the involvement of Mr. Gates. [Ted Koppel] At least one member of the Senate Intelligence
Committee, Bill Bradley of New Jersey, feels that there may be reason to doubt both
those claims, and hell raise the issues next week during the Gates Confirmation
Hearings, next week. The CIA also told us that its Inspector General has found no evidence of
any off-the-books illegal activity. But the CIA concedes, off-the-books activities,
are not documented. Precisely so that deniability can be preserved. One thing is
undeniable, this gun sight video of a stealth fighter bomber from the 32nd Tactical
Fighter Wing, last February attacking a bomb factory, on the outskirts of Bagdad
U.S. Technology in the air, destroying U.S. Technology on the Ground. The factory
was built by Carlos Cardoen. For all of us here at ABC News, Good night. END ABC News Nightline -
July 1991 [Ted Koppel] Carlos Cardoens role in shipping arms
to Iraq has been known for ears. His connection with Robert Gates has not. By the
mid 1980s Cardoen was the largest private supplier of weapons to Iraq. In all he
has believed to ship a half billion dollars worth of arms and advanced technologies
to Bagdad. At a factory 500 miles north of Santiago, Cardoen produced tens of
thousands of bombs and other equipment, absolutely essentially to Iraq during its
eight year war with Iran. The material would be loaded aboard regular Iraqi airway flights flown
from Santiago to Bagdad. Cardoen did not simply ship weapons, he set up entire
factories capable of producing bombs and other explosives the components would
be shipped from all over the world and then assembled in Iraq. One of those
factories turned out Cluster Bombs. As we first reported on the 24th of May, much of the
sophisticated military technology that Cardoen was shipping to Iraq came from the
United States. This company in sleepy Lancaster, Pennsylvania, is believed to be the
source for some of the Cluster Bomb technology. But there was more. Nasser
Bedouin is also an arms dealer. He acted as a middleman between Carlos Cardoen
and Iraq. [Nasser Bedouin
on Video] I am aware of Carlos Cardoen getting some type of technology from the
air fuel bomb from the United States. I believe Iraq has a viable fuel air
explosive. [Ted
Koppel] These explosives are designed to explode just above ground level like
miniature atomic bombs, literally sucking all available oxygen out of the air. It is
clear that Carlos Cardoens special relationship with the United States was not
known by all Departments. When the Commerce Department inquired about that
relationship in early 1987, it received a cable from the U.S. Ambassador to Chile
saying although Cardoen is involved with the sale of armaments, and he has made
his fortune from it, he is considered to be a responsible recipient of U.S. products. In
fact by 1987, the covert relationship between the CIA and Cardoen was already well
established. In 1983 the
Reagan Administration had become alarmed at how poorly the Iraqi military was
doing against Iran. A decision was made at the highest level of Government to begin
helping Iraq. Indeed
ABC News has learned only today, that around that time, in 1983 Ronald Reagan
issued a highly classified Presidential Finding stating that it was important to the
National Interests that arms and technical assistance be covertly funneled to Iraq
and with the help of the CIA. More on the significance of that Presidential Finding in
a moment. What it
unleashed was a flood of US help to Iraq. A former CIA operative who was involved
in the program has told us of a series of covert operations, in which loads of 727s
were flown into Iraq. On one such mission in 1987 our source tells us he
accompanied a planeload of Soviet built one hundred twenty-two missiles. The
Soviet equipment was shipped because it would be compatible with what the Iraqis
already had. By 1987, there was at least one such flight a week into
Bagdad. Our former CIA
source recalls bringing in $100 dollar bills in a bowling bag, they would also carry
whiskey, cartons of cigarettes and copies of Penthouse magazines to speed up the
unloading process, which usually took place at night. Once the White House has
authorized the Covert Assistance Program to Iraq, the CIA took over. In effect the
former CIA operative told us the covert operation amounted to here is what we want
you to do, and we really dont want to know too much about how you do
it. Our source tells us
that he has at least one meeting in 1986 in Florida between Robert Gates and
Carlos Cardoen, the Chilean Arms Dealer. Other sources have told us of other such
meetings. Here in the United States and in Europe. Which brings us to an unsolicited
statement that was telephoned in to Nightline from the Central Intelligence Agency
almost a month ago on June 17th. Allegations, the statement read that Robert Gates
facilitated illegal shipments to Iraq during the 1980s are totally without basis. Since
we had never requested a statement of Mr. Gates, we didnt know quite what to
make of it at the time. But then today we learned of that Presidential Finding,
authorizing the Covert shipment of arms to Iraq. It would be true then that Robert Gates did not
facilitate illegal shipments to Iraq, under the Presidential Finding, the shipments
would have been quite legal. But during this last set of confirmation hearings, back
in 1987, Robert Gates assured the Senate Confirmation Committee that he would
always keep the Committee current on ongoing covert
operations. Indeed the
CIA is supposed to provide the Intelligence Committee with quarterly reports.
According to well-informed sources on the Committee it has had no briefings on the
Covert arms pipeline to Iraq. That, said one Senator on the Committee would be a
total breach of trust. What would it do to the Gates Nomination? I asked. It would
probably be enough said the Senator, to derail the Nomination. Again, an excerpt from Mr. Gates
Testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee in 1987: [Robert Gates 1987 on video] If
you cannot have a system in which you can have some confidence between A the
branches of government, and confidence between the senior officials of the
Government, A that they abide by the rules, and B that they will deal with one
another honestly, then I think the system begins to collapse. [Ted Koppel] Late this evening, the
Whitehouse communicated its response to the charges contained in this report, the
Whole story is unfounded. There were never any sales; covert or overt to Iraq or
Iran through a third country. And Mr. Gates never met with Carlos
Cardoen. Well be
back with more, in a moment. [Ted Koppel] For the viewers, this is Alan Freidman, New York
Correspondent for the Financial Times of London, and a member of the team
investigating Robert Gates. Alan Id like to begin by repeating a statement, and let
me put my specs on for a moment, the White House. This story is unfounded and
there were never any sales covert or overt to Iraq or Iran through a third country.
And Mr. Gates never met with Carlos Cardoen. Ah, ah a fairly carefully drafted statement one would
think. [Alan Friedman,
New York Correspondent for the Financial Times of London] Yes Ted, I think that is
right, I would agree with the statement that there were never any sales Iraq through
a third party. Indeed what we found was that some of the cluster bomb technology
and fuel air technology was given smuggled down to Chile, for use that were used
and made and shipped on through to Iraq. In terms of the um statement by the
White House that there were never any meetings between Mr. Gates and Mr.
Cardoen, we have a number of sources, some of them personally involved in these
operations, one of them who was personally and physically an eye witness present
at a meeting, in Florida, with Mr. Gates and Mr. Cardoen in 1986. And who was told
my Mr. Gates, about other meetings that he had with Mr.
Cardoen. <br style="font-family:
Now Congressman Gejdenson, I realized that we sort of unleashed an awful lot of
material on you today, but to what degree does this fit in with those thousands o
documents that you subpoenaed with the information that you have?
Verdana;">[House
Representative Sam Gejdenson of the House Foreign Affairs Committee] Well we
just got the documents after a several month battle with the Administration to pry
them loose and it took the vote of a subpoena by the subcommittee to start the flow
of those documents, but its certainly consistent with the information that we got
with Committee staffs with some of those people that said they were at those
meetings, ah as well. I think that the important thing to remember here is that the
United States in 1982 under the Reagan Administration took Iraq off the terrorist list
at a time when some of the worst terrorist of the world were being harbored by
Saddam Hussein, and we suddenly changed our policy and continued to keep Iraq
off the terrorist list, enabling the export of dual use, ah items that can be used for
dual use from the United States to Iraq, as well as these sales that went indirectly to
Iraq. So, all through a
time when they were harboring terrorists, and they killed 5,000 Kurds in 1988, and
as recent as six days before the invasion of Kuwait, when I and several members of
Congress, tried to stop the subsidy of grain sales to Iraq, the Bush Administration
continued to impose any sanctions against Iraq. [Ted Koppel] Well of course theres a huge
difference between grain sales and the shipment of entire plants for the building of
a cluster bomb factory. [House Representative Sam Gejdenson of the House Foreign Affairs
Committee] Except for what I think you find is that a pattern by both the Bush and
Reagan Administrations to trying to assist Saddam Hussein. What we found at one
Hearing was a document from the State Department, ah that said that the United
States was ready to sell weapons to Iraq as long as they were for the personal
protection of Saddam Hussein. A policy that ignored all the outrages, a policy that
ignored I think the intent of the Congress and the American People. And that the
allegations that weve gotten from a number of sources seem to be consistent with
that. The United States did everything it could under the Reagan and Bush
Administrations to assist Saddam Hussein. [Ted Koppel] Alan, I know that one of the things that we
discovered in our investigations was and Id like you to elaborate on it a little bit was
that frequently there was Federal Agencies, Law Enforcement Agencies that was
trying to uncover what was going on we found that they were stymied at every turn.
Can you talk about a that a little bit?. [Alan Friedman, New York Correspondent for the Financial Times
of London] Yes I think that if we look back at other discoveries that we made, you
can say that when we found ISC, the company in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, that was,
that had cluster bomb technology, shipped down to Chile that was part of this
covert operation for Iraq, we found that the CIA had detailed knowledge over a
period of 4 years of all sorts of shipments from ISC to South Africa, some of which
were later trans shipped to Iraq, we found that Federal Law Enforcement Officers
and Agencies were unable to do anything about it because they just werent told.
Likewise, we were just told of the case that the man that built the Rapta Chemical
Weapons plant in Libya, who ah, even though the CIA were tracking him very
carefully here in the United States, was allowed to build a chemical weapons plant
here in Florida, and shipped dangerous cyanide with the help of CIA Contract
Shippers to Iraq. All of these things were going on and the investigators seem
unable to do anything about any of these things. We seem to have part of the
Government trying to investigate, and part of the Government trying to
ship. <br style="font-family:
Congressman Gejdenson Id like to get your reaction to that and see if your
experiences have been similar in some of the findings that ah or some of the
conclusions that you have reached, but well take a break first and be back in just a
moment. [House
Representative Sam Gejdenson of the House Foreign Affairs Committee] Well we
saw it ah from across all of the agencies. We had Dennis Kloskey who was then in
charge of export licensing at Commerce testify before our committee in April that he
suggested to Mr. Gates and others that ah meetings at White House to stop the
export of dangerous technologies to Iraq. The following day ah Mr. Kloskey resigned
from the Government. We were told by Mr. Kloskey that the White House, the people
in that room representing the President argued for a policy that assisted Saddam
Hussein in getting dual use technologies. We had Congressman Rose who I know
has been on your show testifying about the grain sales being tied up with funding
weapons to Iraq as well. So across the government, this thing went on. Its hard to
believe that somebody like Mr. Gates in his position didnt know about
it. [Ted Koppel] We
are suggesting a lot more that he knew about it. Were suggesting that he was
actively involved in it let me just pass on a little information that we have gathered
today, having to do with the Confirmation Hearings and was told earlier this
afternoon. Alan Fryers, Senior Officer with the CIA and Clair George are not likely to
be testifying voluntarily, indeed Alan Fryers said he will not be testifying before the
Senate Intelligence Committee. The White House, as we have all heard throughout
the day is putting on some pressure to get those Hearings underway before the
August recess, August 2nd, of course, the Senate goes into recess. Ah, and there
are indications now that a week from Monday, indeed the Hearings will begin, Mr.
Gates will be asked to testify at that time, but Ive been also told that there is no
way that the Hearing will no way be completed before the August
recess. And that Mr. Gates
will be told that he will be recalled again after other witnesses have testified, after
the August recess. So these Hearing now, are destined to go into
September. [House
Representative Sam Gejdenson of the House Foreign Affairs Committee] I think
that is terribly important, because we have to what we have to remember here,
unlike other appointees of the President, what the head of the CIA does is not
transparent. If youre the Secretary of Housing, like Jack Kemp is, and I disagree with
one of his programs, not only do I know about it, but the average citizen knows
about what Jack Kemps doing. Sometimes you agree with it and sometimes you
disagree with him. In the case of the Director of the CIA, as is clear from repeated
experiences, often times even the people in Congress were suppose to know about
these activities are not informed. This has to do with National Security the standard
ought not be somebody that can get by the Hearing process with White House
pressure. The White House ought to be with us on this one, we ought to make sure
that we have someone fully discloses what is going on to the appropriate
committees and to Congress. Not someone involved in Iran Contra and not someone
who hasnt told the entire truth. And not someone who is in question about these
activities. This has to be a definitive decision by the Congress, that this individual
will come clean with the Congress and fulfill not just the letter of the law, but the
spirit of the law. <br style="font-
Koppel] Alright, let me just interrupt here for a moment, because were down to
our last minute and a half or so, Alan, it is inevitable in this kind of investigation that
you run into a lot of sleazy characters and I just want to get from you for our
audience some sense of how much of the information that we have compiled here
comes from the sleazy characters and how much comes from the few that we can
really rely upon? [Alan Friedman, New York Correspondent for the Financial Times of
London] I think, ah Ted the important thing to remember here is that we have had
all kinds of allegations for the last three months when our team has interviewed
dozens of people, weve been acidulously cross checking and weve waited to go
ahead with this story until weve had very credible witnesses. Those who were
documented CIA operatives and those who were physically with Mr. Gates during
those meetings, and we asked some of them why would Mr. Gates take the risk and
go out and meet with Mr. Cardoen and get directly involved and get his hands dirty
in these operations, especially as he was deputy director of the CIA at the time
himself. We were told that he went out because he wanted to give his improvtoire in
order to make sure the job got done. Weve talked to a number of top people and
cross checked. END Whistle-Blowing
Activities Starting in June of 1987, local, state, and federal
authorities were called by Stanley J. Caterbone, including the Federal Bureau of
Investigation, the Federal Securities and Exchange Commission, Congressman
Robert Walker, the Pennsylvania Attorney General, the Lancaster District Attorney,
Manheim Township Police, and a host of others. The following is a memo of a meeting with ISC
executive Mr. Lawrence Resch and Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone at his office at Financial
Management Group, Ltd., which took place on June 23, 1987. Mr. Lawrence Resch, of
San Clamente, California, was a long time associate of Mr. James Guerin who worked
as a marketing consultant, and was an ISC executive prior to the company going
public in 1982. He served as Director of Marketing and head of Lancaster operations
for then defunct United Chem Con, an affiliate of ISC. He was sued by Ferranti
International in 1990 for $189 million dollars and indicted and found guilty by
prosecutors for his role with ISC and served a jail term. Upon the arrival of Mr. Larry Resch,
Stan Caterbone met him in the lobby of Financial Management Group, Ltd, at which
time Larry Resch said "Carl Jacobson could not attend, we had to suddenly fly him
out of the country early this morning (flew to Chile) The meeting was started with
the subject of the financial difficulties of United Chem Con and possible alternatives.
Larry Resch specifically addressed the possibility of moving the operations of United
Chem Con to another facility, with specific regards to the Renovo Plant. Larry Resch
specifically addressed the financing capabilities of Stan Caterbone, along with
possible management opportunities. Larry Resch also gave financial statements and
documents to Stan Caterbone for the latest fiscal year for United Chem Con. Stan
Caterbone went on to allege that United Chem Con had embezzled some
$15,000,000 from the United States Government for contracts that contained
improprieties. Stan Caterbone also alleged improprieties of International Signal
& Control and James Guerin, with specific regards to its role in the United Chem
Con, and its business activities as related to government contracts. Stan Caterbone noted that he, as a legal shareholder of
International Signal & Control was concerned about improper business
activities. Larry Resch was taken by surprise by all of the above. Stan Caterbone
became quite upset by the evasiveness and the lack of specifics with regards to
Larry Resch's conversation. In efforts to thwart any further communication from
James Guerin, United Chem Con, or International Signal & Control, Stan
Caterbone demanded a retainer fee of $10,000 before anyone contacted him again.
The following is a transcript of a meeting with Agent Howard Eisler, of the
Pennsylvania Securities Commission on September 29, 1987. The meeting was
solicited at the bequest of Agent Howard Eisler supposedly for an investigation into
securities violations at Financial Management Group, Ltd., However, that also turned
out to be untrue, or Agent Eisler also ignored all of the violations that occurred at
the company headquarters. The meeting lasted approximately 4 hours at the
residence of Stanley J. Caterbone. Also present were attorney Mr. Robert Byers, and
client of Stanley J. Caterbone, Mr. Millard Johnson. Agent Howard Eisler, in November
of 1987, requested that Stanley J. Caterbone put any complaints or grievances in
writing and never did anything with information or testimony from the
meeting. [Stanley J.
Caterbone, ISC Shareholder; Founder Executive Vice President of
Financial
Management Group, Ltd., and President of FMG Advisory, Ltd.,] - Chem Con is the
big local minority-held corporation that was doing a lot of Defense contracts-it was
associated with ISC. They went under last spring, beginning of the summer, and
there was a lot of criminal allegations made, none of them substantiated. And I was
connected with that. They sent a board member in to see me a week before this happened.
Why. I don't know. Jim Christian owned it - now I hear rumors that I was tied to ISC and I am
close to several people in that organization. Why they sent someone in to California
to see me, I don't know. They wouldnt answer me. They wanted me to talk to a guy from D.C.,
New York, a guy from the Caribbean. I don't know what the hell is going
on. [Mr. Robert Byer,
Criminal Attorney for Stanley J. Caterbone] the supposition was I don't know how
true it was a front for ISC. [Stanley J. Caterbone, ISC Shareholder; Founder Executive Vice President
of Financial
Management Group, Ltd., and President of FMG Advisory, Ltd.,] - It was, I'll tell you
why. Because when Chem Con was started, back to their inception, you look at ISC's
books. They didn't have any money. Well, the fist thing Chem Con did was they went
and got all that free money from the government and you look where that money
went. I bet I know where it went. This guy named Guerin, James Guerin. And I know
that they were selling contracts back. He runs ISC and he also has his fingers pretty
deeply into Chem Con. He's the one who started Chem Con, Guerin is the one who
started it. [Mr. Millard
(Bill) Johnson, Client of Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone] - Wasn't there some allegations
about a tie to Wedtech? (Defense Contractor of New York) [Stanley J. Caterbone, ISC
Shareholder; Founder Executive Vice President of Financial
Management Group, Ltd., and President of FMG Advisory, Ltd.,] - You
bet. They were tied,
you'd better believe they were tied with Wedtech. The same guys in Wedtech were
invoked with ISC and Chem Con. ISC is sold over the London Exchange. (I bought my
shares from Pennsylvania State Senator Gibson Armstrong) I owned a thousand
shares. I sold it when things started to hit the fan- they just did a multimillion dollar
merger with a company in London. They probably think this is going to cover their
tracks. What they did was, they fronted all that money and started the contracts,
went bankrupt, and now the government is stuck for $18,000,000. I know right now
in this town's viewpoint, I stole money, I am insane, and I am a lunatic I tell you I
will not condemn Jim Christian until he tells to my face what happened. "I was
framed and set up. I dont know maybe Jim Christian doesn't have the money.
Maybe Guerin has it or somebody else has it. ARGUMENT Keith, 407 U.S. at 313-14. There,
the Court explained that [n]ational security cases . . . often reflect a convergence of
First and Fourth Amendment values . . . . Fourth Amendment protections become
the more necessary when the targets of official surveillance may be those
suspected of unorthodoxy in their political beliefs. The danger to political dissent is
acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the
power to protect domestic security. Id. The Court thus concluded that Fourth Amendment freedoms
cannot properly be guaranteed if domestic security surveillances may be conducted
solely within the discretion of the Executive Branch. The Fourth Amendment does
not contemplate the executive officers of Government as neutral and disinterested
magistrates. . . . The historical judgment, which the Fourth Amendment accepts, is that
unreviewed executive discretion may yield too readily to pressures to obtain
incriminating evidence and overlook potential invasions of privacy and protected
speech. . . . [T]his
Court has never sustained a search upon the sole ground that officers reasonably
expected to find evidence . . . and voluntarily confined their activities to the least
intrusive means . . . . The Fourth Amendment contemplates a prior judicial judgment, not the
risk that executive discretion may be reasonably exercised. CERTIFICATE OF
SERVICE I hereby certify that on February 21, 2007, I have
mailed by U.S. Postal Service, by electronic means, or by facsimile the foregoing
paper to the following (funds permitted) : ANN BEESON Attorney of
Record JAMEEL JAFFER MELISSA
GOODMAN (admission pending) CATHERINE
CRUMP (admission pending) National Legal
Department 125 Broad Street, 18th
Floor New York, NY 10004-2400 (212) 549-2500 MICHAEL J.
STEINBERG KARY L. MOSS American Civil Liberties Union Fund of Michigan 60 West Hancock Street Detroit, MI 48201-
style="font-family: Verdana;">(313) 578-6814 Kate
Martin CENTER FOR NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES 60 1 Thirteenth Street, N. W. 1120 19th Street,
N.W., Washington, DC 20036 (202) 72 1-5650 Joseph Onek Erin
N. Linder Sharon Bradford Franklin THE CONSTITUTION PROJECT 1025 Vermont
Avenue, Washington, DC 20005 Donald B. Verrilli,
Jr. JENNER & BLOCK LLP S. 800 Suite 1200 South Washington, DC
style="font-family: Verdana;">(202) 639-6095 JENNER
& BLOCK LLP 330 N. Wabash
Avenue N. W. Chicago, IL 60611 Randy Gainer Davis Wright Tremaine LLP 1501 Fourth
Avenue, Suite 2600 Seattle, WA 98101 -
style="font-family: Verdana;">Douglas N. Letter Thomas N.
Bondy Anthony A. Yang Attorneys,
Appellate Staff Washington, DC
style="font-family: Verdana;">Civil Division, Room 7513 U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania
Avenue, NW Washington, DC
style="font-family: Verdana;">Lucy A. Dalglish, Esq. Counsel of Record Gregg P. Leslie,
Esq. Elizabeth J. Soja, Esq. 1101 Wilson Blvd., Suite 1100 Arlington, VA
22209-2211 (703) 807-2100 Attorneys for Amicus Curiae The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press Kathleen
M. Sullivan Derek L.
Shaffer Constitutional Law Center Stanford Law School 559 Nathan
Abbott Way Stanford, California 94305-
style="font-family: Verdana;">ANN BEESON Attorney of
Record JAMEEL JAFFER MELISSA
GOODMAN (admission pending) SCOTT
MICHELMAN (admission pending) CATHERINE
CRUMP (admission pending) National Legal
Department 125 Broad Street, 18th
Floor New York, NY 10004-2400 annb@aclu.org David W. DeBruin Theresa A.
Chmara Julie M. Carpenter Michael B.
DeSanctis Wade B. Gentz JENNER & BLOCK LLP 601 Thirteenth St.,
N.W., 12th Floor Washington, D.C.
style="font-family: Verdana;">tel. (202) 639-6000 fax (202)
639-6066 Margaret A. Costello DYKEMA
GOSSETT PLLC 400 Renaissance
Center Detroit, MI 48243 tel. (313)
568-5306 fax (313) 568-6893 ____________/s/_____________ Date: February 20,
style="font-family: Verdana;">Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se
Litigant 1250 Fremont Street Lancaster,
PA 17603 717-427-1821 facsimile </div> 
V. CITY OF LANCASTER 08-02982
<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: center">IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CATERBONE and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP (Plaintiffs) v. LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE, et. al.,
(Defendants) Case No. 08-cv-02982 </DIV>
<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: left">DEFENDANTS CITY
OF LANCASTER CITY OF LANCASTER MAYOR RICK GRAY SECTOR 9 OF
THE LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE LANCASTER CITY POLICE CHIEF
KEITH SADDLER LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE</DIV> ORDER of October 10,
2008 by U.S. District Court Judge Mary A. McLaughlin - (Case will be re-filed upon
resolving problems of obstruction of justice and due process (computer hacking,
thefts, harassments, etc.,)
"AND NOW, this 10th day of October, 2008, upon
consideration of plaintiffs Motion for Withdraw Without Prejudice (Doc. No. 6) IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED that:<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-
com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p>
(1) Plaintiffs Motion for Withdraw
Without Prejudice is GRANTED; and<o:p></o:p>
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">This case shall remain CLOSED
statistically."<o:p></o:p>
_____________________________________________________________________
<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify">TO THE
HONORABLE, THE JUDGES OF SAID COURT: AND NOW comes PLAINTIFF, Stanley J.
Caterbone and Advanced Media Group, as pro se, and respectfully avers as follows:
PLAINTIFF, Stanley J. Caterbone, resides at 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA,
17603, is a United States Citizen and Advanced Media Group is a fictitious name
registered in Pennsylvania with its principal place of business in Pennsylvania.
 PLAINTIFF files a CIVIL COMPLAINT against the DEFENDANTS named in
the above caption on in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania on this 6th day of June 2008. As in previous filings, this complaint is
filed under duress. Date: June 6, 2008
 Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se 1250 Fremont Street Lancaster, PA
17603 amgroup01@msn.com www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com CIVIL COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION 1. Stanley J. Caterbone (CATERBONE) and Advanced Media Group were
located at 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, Pennsylvania (Conestoga Township) until
August 30, 2006 when CATERBONE temporarily moved into a family residence at
1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, Pennsylvania (City of Lancaster). 2. The
PLAINTIFF, Stanley J. Caterbone (CATERBONE), alleges that the City of Lancaster and
the Lancaster City Bureau of Police and others colluded to deliberately ignore
CATERBONES complaints, an abuse of process, in an effort to retaliate, subvert,
interrupt and deter current and ongoing litigation and civil complaints against
several major businesses and government agencies with headquarters in the City of
Lancaster and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Those would include the
Lancaster General Hospital; High Industries (not Penn Square Partners and the
Lancaster County Convention Center); Fulton Bank and Fulton Financial Corporation;
a Wachovia Bank branch (pending); Lancaster Newspapers; the County of
Lancaster; the Lancaster County Prison; the Hotel Brunswick (pending); James
Street Investment District (pending); Aurora Films; Haverstick Films (pending); and
the Lancaster City Bureau of Police. The City of Lancaster and the Lancaster City
Bureau of Police are derelict in their duties in forcing CATERBONE to litigate for
duties and services due CATERBONE that are mandated in the bylaws of the City of
Lancaster. 3. CATERBONE also alleges that the Lancaster City Bureau of Police
were used to retaliate, subvert, interrupt and deter other litigation and civil
complaints against other police departments, namely the Southern Regional Police
Department, the Manheim Township Police Department, the East Lampeter Police
Department, the Millersville Boro Police, the Avalon Police Department and the
Stone Harbor Police Department. CATERBONE alleges that Southern Regional Police
Chief John Fiorill used is official capacity as President of the Red Rose Chapter of the
Fraternal Order of Police to help accomplish these civil torts. 4.
CATERBONE alleges that by ignoring his complaints the Lancaster City Police Bureau
of Police gave the green light, or approval, for others to continue a long and
successful period of harassment, thievery, property damage, computer and
electronic hacking, deletion and manipulation of court related documents, records
and evidence, mail fraud, eaves dropping, invasion of privacy, criminal trespass,
and the like. These activities are so intense that they have taken on the
characteristics of a hate crime. 5. CATERBONE alleges that the gross abuse
and gross negligence defamed his name and that of his company, ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP, which discredited his reputation in an effort to diminish credibility in
the courts; to thwart any reprimands by oversight agencies; and to disrupt and
thwart any possible business relations and operations of ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP.
This has resulted in direct and immediate financial loss, loss of time, and loss of
income. 6. Chief Keith Sadler and the Lancaster City Police Bureau rejected
and refused to resolve these disputes through mediation when CATERBONE opened
a case with the Lancaster Center for Mediation in May of 2008. Keith Sadler
communicated to the Lancaster Mediation Center on May 8, 2008 that he would not
cooperate and mediate with CATERBONE. 7. On several occasions
in 2007 several police officers of the Lancaster City Bureau of Police instructed
CATERBONE, in person upon responding to complaints, not to call 911 or the
Lancaster City Police Department and that the Lancaster City Bureau of Police would
not respond or take complaints. 8. The Lancaster City Bureau of Police only
took one (1) incident of gas siphoned and stolen from CATERBONEs 1991 Dodge
pickup truck, and refused to take the over 50 (from December 20, 2007 to present),
or so other incidents as a complaint, regardless of the efforts to have Lancaster City
Mayor Rick Grey and the Lancaster City Solicitor to look into the allegations and
complaints. CATERBONE had meticulously documented the incidents in a journal
and a log of gas receipts, photographs, and odometer miles for all of the incidents.
CATERBONE also made a thorough and documented calibration of his 1991 Dodge
Dakota Pick-Up truck with logs of mileage and times and dates of gas purchases in a
report to prove the gas was stolen. Lancaster City Police Bureau Officer Cosmore
returned the report with such words as counterfeit, fake, written on it and had
the audacity to ask CATERBONE if he had a certification of the gas pumps that
were listed on gas receipts. There were some days when the gas was stolen 2 or
more times. CATERBONE alleges that perpetrators were using a kerosene battery
operated siphon, or like kind, to siphon the gas from the gas tank.<BR
Lancaster City Bureau of Police had responded to approximately 10 or so 911 calls
in the last eighteen (18) months to 1250 Fremont Street, residence of CATERBONE,
for complaints of property damage; stolen property, missing legal and business files
and evidence for litigation; computer and electronic hacking with deleted electronic
files; harassment; terrorist threats, stalking, stolen mail, etc.,. 10.
CATERBONE had complained of abuse of process to state and federal law
enforcement regarding the situation, including U.S. Senator Arlen Specters office.
CATERBONE had also visited the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in both
Harrisburg and Philadelphia for help and intervention. 11. CATERBONE also
had personal meetings with Lancaster City Mayor Rick Gray in Lancaster City Hall on
at least 4 occasions to find a solution to the problems and for help to mediate the
problems and or resolve the conflicts. The resulting pain and suffering, as well as
loss and destruction of property and financial loss that CATERBONE was undergoing
was unprecedented. 12. In November of 2007, CATERBONE and the
Advanced Media Group went public with their Downtown Lancaster investments and
business plans that were culminated over the past 9 years. The Advanced Media
Group also formerly and publicly introduced their Downtown Lancaster Action Plan
via handouts, websites, and blogs; and began meetings and negotiations with major
stakeholders, City of Lancaster Public Officials, Developers, and
investors. 13. In 1997 CATERBONE had solicited Attorney Christina Rainville of
Philadelphia and pro bono attorney for Lisa Michelle Lambert in the Laurie Show
murder case. The murder trials and appeals of the Lambert case demonized Ms.
Christina Rainville and U.S. District Court Judge Stewart Dalzell. After CATERBONE
submitted documents and audio recordings, Ms. Christina Rainville had
communicated with CATERBONE that she was not able to take his case due to the
fact that her Philadelphia law firm had banned her from taking on any more
Lancaster County residents, despite the fact that many more sought her legal
counsel. On December 31, 1997, CATERBONE had also personally delivered a CD-
ROM to the chambers of U.S. District Court Judge Stewart Dalzell in an effort to
bring attention to his case. In May of 1998 CATERBONE submitted an AFFADAVIT to
the law firm of Schneider and Harrison outlining the prosecutorial misconduct or
Finding of Facts of the 1987 cover-up for Ms. Christina Rainville. CATERBONE alleges
that these facts were part of the attitude and the motives for the law enforcement-
at-large of Lancaster County and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to ignore the
rule of law and procedure in order to bring these false arrests and malicious
prosecutions. The Lancaster County community-at-large had the same attitude
toward CATERBONE. The Lambert case received national notoriety when U.S.
District Judge Stuart Dalzell freed Lambert on a Habeus Corpus appeal hearing
citing she was actually innocent beyond a reasonable doubt. Judge Dalzell was
quoted in chambers as saying, "I can tell you, Mr. Madenspacher, that I've thought
about nothing else but this case for over three weeks, and in my experience, sir,
and I invite you to disabuse me of this at oral argument, I want you and I want the
Schnader firm to look for any case in any jurisdiction in the English-speaking world
where there has been as much prosecutorial misconduct, because I haven't found
it. The case was covered by a 3 part series in the Los Angeles Times by writer
Barry Seigel on November 10, 1997 and a television episode on the A&E
Network American Justice Series. The Lancaster community gathered over 10,000
signatures on a petition to impeach U.S. District Judge Stewart Dalzell for his rulings.
In the end, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania took control of the case and
appealed the ruling that freed Lambert sending her back to prison. The case went
all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court in 2005, after being denied any review. The
case accentuated the rights of Federal Law vs. State Law and the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania solicited a team of attorney generals from across the nation to help
their cause. CATERBONE attended a hearing before former Lancaster County Court
Common Pleas Judge Larry Stengel in the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.
To this day, due to his knowledge and experience with the Lancaster County Judicial
System and Law Enforcement, and his own dire civil complaints, CATERBONE
believes that the over zealous prosecution proves that prosecutorial misconduct
was never thoroughly investigated or prosecuted in the Lambert case. CATERBONE
will not let that happen in his cases. CAUSES OF ACTION 14. On or about April 14, 2008
1999 HP Notebook n5150 laptop was rendered useless by an intruder shorting the
power cord. This was the third computer rendered useless since November of 2007,
and the last computer available for use in the home and office. Other incidents were
happening while at 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA since 1997. The only
computer available for use was the public computer at the Lancaster County Library
on North Duke Street in downtown Lancaster. 15. On March 18, 2008
CATERBONE went to the Hotel Brunswick in Downtown Lancaster to continue take
measurements of the Movie Theater for his continued efforts of a business and
development plan. (The Brunswick Movie Theater, or Eric, had been closed since
1995. CATERBONE and Advanced Media Group had an agreement with the Owner of
the Brunswick, Hamid Zahedi, to make a formal proposal and offer for leasing the
site. CATERBONE had begun discussions in 2006.) On March 18, 2008 CATERBONE
noticed that the United States Department of Justice Office of Trustee was
conducting hearings for Chapter 11 petitioners in the Presidential Room of the Hotel
Brunswick. CATERBONE had not received ORDERS from his United States Third
Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 08-3054 for his appeal of an issue in his Chapter
11 Case No. 05-23059. CATERBONE alleged that the ORDERS were stolen or never
mailed from the clerk of courts. CATERBONE thought maybe Dave Adams, the
trustee for the United States Department of Justice Office of Trustee might be
conducting the hearings. The following day CATERBONE received a disturbing email
from Mr. Barry A. Solodky, Esquire, of Blakinger, Byler & Thomas, P.C., 28 Penn
Square, Lancaster, PA 17603. CATERBONE had known Mr. Solodky since the 1980s
and had even solicited him to review his bankruptcy matters before the Appllent
filed his Chapter 11 case on May 23, 2005. The following email exchanges detail the
incident and the false reports and allegations from a member of Blakinger, Byler
& Thomas, P.C.: Subject:
Verdana">Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 08:18:00 -0400 From: bas@bbt-
law.com To: amgroup01@msn.com Hi Stan, Hope this note finds you well. Yesterday afternoon I had to attend some
bankruptcy meetings on behalf of some clients. While there the Trustee told me
about an event which concerned her. She showed me your card and told me what
happened. In fact she said she almost considered calling the police because of the
incident. I assured her you were not the
type of person that would do anything inappropriate. I did want you to know she is
not an employee of the Dept. of Justice or the Bankruptcy Court; she is a private
panel trustee just as I was for 33 years. If for some reason you have issues with the
bankruptcy system she is not a person who should be hassled as she has nothing to
do with your case. I'm sending this only
because I don't want there to be any further incidents which might cause her
concern or the Federal marshals will get involved and I know they can be nasty.
Needless to say I don't want to see anything to you which would cause you any
problems. I am sure I will bump into you
soon. Have a nice Easter. Barry A.
Solodky, Esquire Blakinger, Byler & Thomas, P.C. 28 Penn
Square Lancaster, PA 17603 (717) 509-7273 CATERBONEs Response to Mr. Barry A. Solodkys email: RE: Meeting wih the Dept of Justice. From: Stan
Caterbone (amgroup01@msn.com) Sent: Sat 3/22/08 8:36
AM To: Barry A. Solodky (bas@bbt-law.com) Cc: FBI, Field Office
(philadelphia@fbi.gov); Landis, Detective Michael(landism@co.lancaster.pa.us);
info@hotelbrunswick.com Bcc: March 22, 2008 Re: Meeting
With Department of Justice Barry
Solodky, First, I would have responded
earlier, however, your email found it's way into my junk email. Secondly, as an officer of the court, you better be
careful about spreading lies about me and fabrications about events that did not
happen. By the way, a copy of this will go directly to the Federal Bureau of
Investigation Philadelphia Field Office and Detective Michael Landis of the Lancaster
County District Attorney Office. Who do you think you are talking to? Thirdly, here is what transpired. The day before I
received an ORDER from the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, which was purposely
postmarked 10 days after the Clerk filed and dated the Mail to copy to myself. The
ORDER was for a no response to a Show Cause ORDER, which someone had stole
from my mail, which I never received. The Third Circuit case was an appeal from my
Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Now, on
Wednesday morning I made plans to go to the Hotel Brunswick and take some
measurements in the Movie Theater, which I am in the middle of a development
plan. As usual, I walked into the lobby on the street level adjacent to the parking
garage and saw the easel with the notice that the "Department of Justice" was
holding bankruptcy hearings. I was told a few years ago earlier in my Chapter 11
that they often hold hearings in Lancaster, at the Brunswick or at the Hotel on
Manheim Pike. As soon as I saw the sign I figured I would see if Joe Adams, my
Trustee from the Philadelphia Office of the Department of Justice Office of Trustee
that handles my case, was here. So, as I
usually do, I went to the office of Kevin, the Hotel Brunswick General Manager to get
the key to the movie theater, as per our agreement with Hamid, the owner of the
Hotel Brunswick. He was not in his office, and the Desk Manager had to page him. I
asked him where the Department of Justice was holding the hearings, and told him I
needed to talk to someone there, while he was trying to locate Kevin, the General
Manager. I told him I would be right back. I went to the Presidential Room where they were holding meetings. When
I arrived, the Trustee, or what private panel trustee, was conducting a meeting with
a Spanish woman, who had a young girl for a translator. I patiently waited by the
wall as you walk in until the entire interview was over. After the private panel
trustee dismissed the woman, I approached her and asked her if she was from the
Department of Justice Office of the Trustee, and she responded that she was a
private panel trustee. I simply told her that I had a problem with someone
obstructing justice with my Third Circuit case and asked her if Joe Adams was in her
office. She said she was not from the Philadelphia Office. I gave her my card and
some woman kept trying to talk and interfere. I just calmly left. I went to meet
Kevin, the General Manager, he opened the movie theater and I spent
approximately 1 hour taking measurements of the existing floor plan. There was no incident to speak of. Any incident was
a lie, regardless of the person that kept interfering with our conversation that was
trying to cause problems. It was not me, you fool. I would suggest that you provide this email to the person that told you
that fabricated lie and anyone else that you communicate with regarding your so
called version of an "incident". Follow this link and you may read why people like
you lie about these incidents. Now, you
have a nice Easter Weekend. And by the way, I am a supporter of Senator Clinton
and I do volunteer my services, just in case you were wondering. Advanced Media Group Stan J.
Caterbone www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com 16. Sometime in February of 2008 by way of computer hacking or
misconduct within the staff of the Clerk of Court of the Third Circuit Court of
Appeals, CATERBONE was erroneously and maliciously placed on electronic email
distribution with no paper copies for all of his ORDERS for all of his cases, which at
that time numbered four (4), without the knowledge of CATERBONE. After receiving
one of the email alerts and ORDERS CATERBONE personally visited the Clerk of
Court for the Third Circuit and was told by staff that it was just a new courtesy copy.
The staff did not notify CATERBONE that his cases would not be eligible for paper
copies of ORDERS. CATERBONE was alleging since February that his ORDERS were
being stolen in the U.S. mails, and only received information in April on the bottom
of a copy of a letter attached to an ORDER for Case No. 3054 that he was switched
to electronic email distribution with no paper copies. This makes no sense since,
filing as pro se, CATERBONE is not eligible to file any electronic documents in any
U.S. or Pennsylvania Courts without a Pennsylvania Bar License. 17. On
several occasions since February 2008, CATERBONE was not able to open the Third
Circuit electronic ORDERS on the first attempt, which denied CATERBONE access or
knowledge of the Third Circuit ORDERS with no way of retrieving them again.
CATERBONE was not even able to respond or know how the United States Third
Circuit Court of Appeals had ruled or what ORDERS were handed down, which also
denied CATERBONE any chance to follow court mandated responses in a timely
fashion. 18. On April 17, 2008 CATERBONE went to respond to the U.S. Third
Circuit Court of Appeals for case no. 3054-07 and CATERBONEs paper copies of his
briefs and filings were stolen and were not in his home and office.<BR
From April 14, 2008 to April 19, 2008 CATERBONE was electronically hacked by
professional computer hackers at the Lancaster County Library in a more hostile
manner than usual. At one time CATERBONE had lost three or more hours of work
for the Downtown Theater at Hotel Brunswick business and development plan, and
the hackers had also deleted sensitive research and data files for the
project. 20. On April 15, 2008 CATERBONE had his brakes rigged on his
bicycle while riding in downtown Lancaster, which almost caused CATERBONE to
loose control and again rendered his bicycle unfit to ride. CATERBONE reported the
incident to Lancaster County Sheriff Terry Bergman and deputy Bourne at the
Lancaster County Courthouse. The Lancaster County Sheriff provided tools to
CATERBONE to fix the brakes at the Lancaster County Courthouse.<BR
From April 14th to May 6th, 2008, CATERBONE had his gas siphoned out of his 1991
Dodge Dakota Pickup truck on at least 7 different occasions. On April 29th, 2008,
CATERBONE was scheduled for oral arguments before the Superior Court of
Pennsylvania at 9:30 am and had his gas siphoned the evening or day before and
had missed the 7:39am Amtrak train to Harrisburg and missed the Superior Court
Appeal Hearing for Case No. 855 MDA 2007. 22. On April 7th, 2008,
CATERBONE had $200 of fraudulent fees charged to his Wachovia Bank checking
account via a clever guise of posting transactions and erroneous statements of the
account. 23. During the month of April and up until the Pennsylvania Primary
CATERBONE has documented several incidents of harassment at the Lancaster
Campaign Headquarters for Senator Hillary Clinton at Queen and Chestnut Streets.
CATERBONE had formally volunteered for the campaign. CATERBONE had alleged
misconduct by several key Lancaster Officials and politicians that have influence in
Lancaster City. Most were Obama Supporters and two were Obama elected
delegates. It was ironic that Lancaster County was one of only 7 of 67 counties in
Pennsylvania to vote for Obama. 24. On April 18, 2008,
CATERBONE received a fraudulent invoice and collections letter from the Lancaster
County Credit Bureau for $96.00 from the Lancaster County Prison. CATERBONE
immediately went to the Lancaster County Prison and met with Vincent Guarini, the
Warden, who made certain he would take care of the matter and have the Lancaster
Credit Bureau delete the invoice and the charge from CATERBONEs
record. 25. On several days in April his U.S. Postal Carrier, Mr. Mitchell, in
delivering his mail had harassed CATERBONE. For the past year or so, CATERBONE
had a sign on his front door that instructed the U.S. Postal Carrier to ring the bell if
the screen door was locked, which they had done. Then suddenly the U.S. Postal
Carrier refused to ring the door or deliver the mail if the screen door was locked and
lied and said he never did it that way before. 26. For the past 2 years
CATERBONE had problems and numerous complaints (drug trafficking, prostitution,
thefts, harassment, destruction of Appellants property, thefts of stolen files,
siphoning of gas, stalking) with local law enforcement and the City of Lancaster
officials regarding the next-door occupants of 1252 Fremont Street, and its owner,
Mr. William Lefty Plank, a convicted felon (vehicular homicide with DUI, Robbery,
Assault, False Identification, Driving Under Suspension, Probation Violations, etc.,
and career criminal. 27. CATERBONE had made formal complaints
to Lancaster City Mayor Rick Gray regarding the incidents and allegations of 1252
Fremont Street during personal meetings during February, March, and April Open
Door public one on one meetings for the public with the Mayor. During February,
March, and April, CATERBONE pleaded with Lancaster City Mayor Rick Gray to
intervene with the Lancaster City Police to try to resolve the disputes and to take
CATERBONEs complaints and incident reports. After the Mayor failed to bring any
change to the situation, CATERBONE notified Mayor Rick Gray that CATERBONE
would file for mediation with the Lancaster Center for Mediation after the newly
appointed Chief of Lancaster City Police, Keith Sadler was sworn into office on or
about April 23, 2008. 28. After almost 2 months of complaints
regarding an unregistered and un-inspected old junk pickup truck (Owned by
William Lefty Plank, parked in the alley behind 1252 Fremont Street, on April 15,
2008 the Lancaster City Bureau of Housing and Inspections placed a Red Public
Nuisance and/or Hazardous Vehicle sticker on the truck. The sticker requires the
owner to remove the vehicle within 48 hours or face a $1,000 per day fine and have
the vehicle towed at the owners expense. CATERBONE again complained to both the
Lancaster City Bureau of Housing and Inspections and the Lancaster City Police after
it was not removed. Finally, on April 21, 2008 CATERBONE visited the Lancaster City
Bureau of Housing and Inspections and again complained. Within hours the vehicle
was finally towed. In April of 2007, CATERBONE had his mint condition 1991 Dodge
Dakota Pickup delivered to his home and office at 1250 Fremont Street after being
stolen by Parula Properties, LLC on December 20, 2006. The Lancaster City Bureau
of Housing and Inspections placed the Red Public Nuisance and/or Hazardous
Vehicle on the truck because CATERBONEs could not afford insurance or
registration. CATERBONE removed his 1991 Dodge Dakota pickup truck within 24
hours after being threatened with the $1,000 per day fine and having the truck
towed away at a location with a per diem charge. 29. On April 22, 2008 while
CATERBONE was polling for the Lancaster Campaign Office to elect Hillary Clinton,
at the Helena Greek Orthodox church on Hershey Avenue. First on the way to the
voting precinct, which was only 5 blocks from CATERBONEs home and office,
CATERBONE ran out of gas because some one again siphoned his gas tank.
Lancaster City Councilman Nelson Polite, who showed up to poll for Barrack Obama,
harassed CATERBONE. CATERBONE did not want to take any more harassment and
went back to the Lancaster Office to elect Hillary Clinton and filed a formal
complaint. 30. On April 22, 2008 the 1252 Fremont Street property, and its
owner, Mr. William Lefty Plank had the house CONDEMNED by the Lancaster City
Bureau of Housing and Inspections. The notice read as follows: NOTICE THIS
PROPERTY HAS BEEN CONDEMNED As Being Unfit For Human Habitation and May
Not Be Occupied Until Repaired. The penalty for violation of this notice can be a fine
of $1,000 per day or a term of imprisonment up to 90 days per offense. Do not
obstruct or remove this notice under penalty of law. CITY OF LANCASTER
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT (717)291-4705.
The property of 1252 Fremont Street was never evacuated, and persons continued
to Habitat the property no matter how many times CATERBONE complained to
officials of the Lancaster City Bureau of Housing and Inspections, the Lancaster City
Police Department, or the Mayor of Lancaster, Mayor Rick Gray. The Lancaster City
Housing and Inspections Bureau advised CATERBONE during personal visits to the
office that 1252 Fremont Street was CONDEMNED for water shut-off, and that no
one was permitted in the property. They advised CATERBONE to notify the Lancaster
City Police if anyone was seen in the house. CATERBONE has constantly heard
voices and persons inside the 1252 Fremont Street during the entire period of
Condemnation. 31. On or about April 24, 2008 a female and a Hispanic
male approached 1252 Fremont Street from the back alley. CATERBONE instructed
the two individuals that no one was allowed in the property, under the
condemnation laws. They argued and entered the property with a key. CATERBONE
called 911 for the Lancaster City Police. Two Lancaster City Police officers arrived
within 10 minutes and William Lefty Plank and Lee Schopf appeared. They argued
that they were permitted in the house to retrieve things. The two individuals were
not seen. The Lancaster City Police ORDERED everyone out of the house and
advised them to vacate the property. The Lancaster City Police instructed me to
keep calling if anyone is seen in the house. 32. On April 26, 2008 a
white mail approached 1252 Fremont Street from the front while CATERBONE was
outside working on his property next door. CATERBONE advised the person not to go
inside and the person threatened CATERBONE with physical violence and walked
into the house at 1252 Fremont Street. CATERBONE called 911 to report the threat
to his person and that a person had just went inside 1252 Fremont Street. One
Lancaster City Police officer arrived on foot within approximately 10 minutes and
waited for backup before pounding on the door of 1252 Fremont Street. Another
Lancaster City Police Officer arrived on foot walking up Fremont Street from the
Euclid Avenue vicinity. CATERBONE then went inside his home and office next door
at 1250 Fremont Street. After several minutes of pounding on the door, William
Lefty Plank opened the door and Lee Schopf walked out of the door. CATERBONE
watched through his screen door and was waiting for the tall white male that
threatened him to appear. CATERBONE opened his screen door and told the
Lancaster City Police that they were not seen when the tall white male entered 1252
Fremont Street. Both Plank and Schopf said there was no one else inside of 1252
Fremont Street. Later more Lancaster City Police officers arrived and they
handcuffed Lee Schopf and escorted him to a Lancaster City Police cruiser waiting in
front of 1250 Fremont Street. The tall white mail apparently left out the back door
before the Lancaster City Police arrived, or before they inspected the house. The
Lancaster City Police vacated the premises and rang on the door of CATERBONE.
The Lancaster City Police Officer explained that they would call on the Lancaster
City Bureau of Housing and Inspections on Monday morning to confirm the story by
Plank that he was allowed in the house to retrieve items. Plank said he needed his
cell phone charger. If the Lancaster City Bureau of Housing and Inspections
confirmed that they were not allowed in the house, then the Lancaster City Police
officer said they would charge the two with trespass. The Lancaster City Police
officer said that Lee Schopf had outstanding warrants on him. After the Lancaster
City Police had left the scene William Lefty Plank knocked on CATERBONEs door to
argue that they were allowed inside and that he was going back inside the house.
CATERBONE slammed the door and told William Lefty Plank to stay away from
him. On Monday, April 28, 2008 CATERBONE went to the office of the Lancaster City
Bureau of Housing and Inspections and talked to a male who said he was the
supervisor, he confirmed to CATERBONE that no one was allowed inside 1252
Fremont Street and told CATERBONE to keep calling the Lancaster City Police, but
said it in a sarcastic manner to irritate CATERBONE because no one would enforce
the Condemnation Notice. 33. On the early morning of April 24, 2008 at
the Brickyard Bar and Restaurant on North Prince Street CATERBONE was assaulted
by a tall black male. CATERBONE went up to the bar to pay for his tab, one drink,
and the assailant started to harass CATERBONE about what was inside his backpack.
CATERBONE left and went downstairs to the lobby where his bicycle was locked. The
assailant followed and kept harassing CATERBONE. CATERBONE warned the
assailant to stay away from CATERBONE or he would call the police. The assailant
pulled out his cell phone and kept saying he has the police in his back pocket, or
something to that extent. CATERBONE walked his bicycle out the door as other
patrons arrived and rode down the Brickyard pavement toward North Prince Street.
The assailant chased CATERBONE and grabbed his backpack tearing it in half and
stopping CATERBONE. CATERBONE quickly reached back so that all of the legal files
would not spill and kept yelling at the assailant to get away. The assailant kept
asking CATERBONE if he was a Federali or Federal Agent. CATERBONE saw a
Lancaster City Police cruiser on the west side of Lemon street at a stop light and
quickly rode to flag the police down. The Lancaster City Police drove across the
intersection and stopped in the middle of the street. CATERBONE told the officer
what happened and he said he would drive around to Prince Street to the front of
the Brickyard. CATERBONE went back to Prince Street for his bicycle and saw the
assailant approaching him again. CATERBONE sped away following the police cruiser
to the corner of the alley at Market Street and Lemon Street to hide from the
assailant. The Lancaster City Police cruise was out of sight. After the assailant
disappeared CATERBONE went back to the Brickyards via Lemon Street to look for
the Lancaster City Police. After a few minutes the Lancaster City Police cruiser
appeared from James Street and turned down Prince Street. The Lancaster City
Police took a statement from CATERBONE and CATERBONE asked the Lancaster City
Police for a ride home because CATERBONE could not ride and hold the backpack
together at the same time. CATERBONE explained that there were Federal case files
in the backpack, but they refused and told CATERBONE to call a taxi. CATERBONE
wrapped his backpack up with a bungi cord and went home. A few days later
CATERBONE went back to the Lancaster City Police Bureau and requested a report
of the incident. Officer Cosmore printed CATERBONE a summary of the call from
County-Wide Communications with a log of the time of the call, a description, and
the responding officers names, and instructed CATERBONE to check back later for a
complete report. CATERBONE did and was instructed to go to the records office of
the Lancaster City Police Bureau where they demanded $15.00 for a verification
letter. CATERBONE waited for about ten minutes after the clerk said she would
print one out, but left after no one came back to the window. 36. On May 1, 2008 the Advanced Media Group Website at
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com was hacked and only 1 hit showed up on
the statistics report. 37. On May 6, 2008 the scanner and printer
was again rendered inoperable. 38. On May 6, 2008 the Advanced Media
Group Website at www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com was hacked and shut
down with only 44 hits showed up on the statistics report.<BR
May 7, 2008 Wachovia Bank illegally charged CATERBONE a $10.00 fee for a cahiers
check in an effort to incite and harass. The Wachovia Bank has processed at least
10 cashier checks prior to this date without ever charging a fee. Joe Caterbone,
uncle of CATERBONE was present in line and walked out after CATERBONE ignored
him. 40. May 7, 2008 was one of most painful days of electromagnetic
radiation for CATERBONE. 41. On May 8, 2008 the Lancaster City Water
Department turned on the water at 1252 Fremont Street and the CONDEMNED
NOTICE was removed. 42. ON May 8, 2008 the electronic version of a
brief filed by CATERBONE for Superior Court Case No. MDA 2053-07 was hacked and
changed. 43. On May 9, 2008 the link to the Downtown Lancaster Action Plan
of the Advanced Media Group website was hacked and turned off.<BR
May 10, 2008 after noise all night at 1252 Fremont Street, the home of William
Lefty Plank and Lee Schopf, the hot tub jet switch was turned on twice during the
day in an effort to run up the electric bill. At about 8:30 am a long grey haired male
started an altercation and screamed and threatened CATERBONE from the backyard
of 1252 Fremont Street, the home of William Lefty Plank and Lee
Schopf. 45. On May 12, 2008, as with most mornings CATERBONE tried to
get a free breakfast at the St. James Episcopal Church Food Kitchen. The church had
a policy of placing all backpacks outside the facility and hanging them on the
wooden fence in the rear. On several occasions when CATERBONE had very
sensitive court related materials inside, he had left the backpack at Lancaster City
Hall, and even at the Lancaster Public Library. On one occasion a few weeks ago an
alternate Schadd Detective Agency Security Officer locked up the backpack in an
office inside St. James Episcopal Church. On this day, May 12, 2008, CATERBONE
decided to request some sort of exception from the administrators of St. James
Episcopal Church. The woman administrator in the office of St. James Episcopal
Church allowed CATERBONE to place the backpack with court documents and filings
insider the church administrators office. She said she would inform George Dunn,
the Schadd Detective Agency Security Officer that he had her permission.
CATERBONE proceeded to the line for breakfast and Mr. George Dunn immediately
made him leave the line and told him it was not her decision. CATERBONE was
instructed to take the backpack with court related documents and filings out of the
building. He told George Dunn, the Schadd Detective Agency Security Officer that
the matter would be taken up with his Superiors. The James Street District Security
employee stood close by trying to insinuate that CATERBONE was in the wrong and
causing problems. Immediately following the incident, CATERBONE went to the
Lancaster County Library, which was located right next door, and Googled Schaad
Detective Agency to find an email address to file a complaint and found the
following article: Schadd Detective agency owner to stand trial on prostitution
charge by MATTHEW KEMENY, The Patriot- News Friday February 01, 2008, 3:28 PM
Provided PhotoRussell L. Wantz Jr. The owner of one of the largest private detective
and security agencies in central Pennsylvania will stand trial on a charge of criminal
attempt to solicit a prostitute, a Dauphin County district judge ruled today. Russell
Leroy Wantz Jr., 57, who owns the York-based Schaad Detective Agency, Inc., was
arrested Dec. 10 in Swatara Twp., after police said he arraigned to meet a woman
for sex at the Red Roof Inn. 46. On May 13, 2008 CATERBONE went to the
office of Spiziri Insurance to use a computer offered by owner John Spiziri.
CATERBONE was hacked and windows explorer would not work while trying to make
a CD-ROM backup of files from a thumb drive. 47. Again on May 13, 2008
the statistics report for Advanced Media Group was hacked and not
displayed. 48. On May 15, 2008 CATERBONE was hacked at the Lancaster
County Library while trying to display the electronic ORDER of the U.S. Third Circuit
Court of Appeals, thus denying him access to the document. There is only 1 (one)
view allowed per electronic email. The Library staffer that was in the Duke Street
Business Center of the Library during that time made a remark before the incident
as if she was involved. 49. On May 18, 2008 immediately following
the Sunday mass at St. Marys Catholic Church, which CATERBONE attends on a
regular basis and is a member, had made arrangements with Charles Chip
Snyder, owner operator of Snyder Funeral Home, to pick up the remaining estate
files of his brother, Sammy Caterbone (December 25, 1984 death). The Snyder
Funeral Home and Chip Snyder was the mortician and the first to raise concern and
doubt that the suicide on the death certificate did not make sense since there were
no marks of any kind on the neck of the Sammy Caterbone when the remains were
retrieved from Santa Barbara, California. That observation and notification to
CATERBONE started the formal process and investigation into Sammy Caterbones
cause of death back in 1984. They agreed to that the files would be available at the
King Street Office of Snyder Funeral Home. At that Mass, Fr. Leo Goodman had
announced to the congregation that St. Marys was going to start a video broadcast
of the Sunday morning mass on network television and a web cast for those that are
homebound; and requested feedback from the congregation. CATERBONE waited to
offer his services to Fr. Leo Goodman and talked to him outside after mass. Father
Leo Goodman tried to humiliate and harass CATERBONE, as he has done on so many
occasions. 50. On May 19, 2008, CATERBONE observed the owner of 1242
Fremont Street, Wally (last name unknown), leaving a note for the occupants at the
front door. CATERBONE has also been making formal complaints regard the
activities of that residence and had an illegally parked car removed from the back
alley a few weeks before. CATERBONE informed Wally of suspicious activity that
looked like drug trafficking with people going in and out during the day and night,
similar to 1252 Fremont Street. Wally thought they were selling drugs also. Wally
confirmed that they were not paying rent and he was evicting the tenants.
CATERBONE went back to his residence and heard yelling and screaming from 1242
Fremont Street, and heard the tenants threaten Wally with physical threats and
Sylvia Boas, 1244 Fremont Street also yelling at Wally. Wally was walking to his car
and threatening to call the police. 51. On May 20, 2008,
CATERBONE left his residence in his 1991 Dodge truck and within a half of block was
stalked by Mr. Joseph Caterbone and Ms. Dee Stover Butz. Blocks away CATERBONE
got out of his car at a red light and asked Mr. Joseph Caterbone (Uncle) if he was
following him, and went back to his car, where Dee Stover Butz was directly behind
CATERBONE. CATERBONE asked her while she was waiving to him in a sarcastic
manner, if she was 12 years old. CATERBONE went immediately to the Headquarters
of WGAL-TV where there was supposed to be a protest of the TV Station for the bias
of the media coverage of the Clinton-Obama presidential race. CATERBONE received
an email the day before soliciting protestors from Rebecca Lytle, a Clinton campaign
person for Lancaster County. In the parking lane of WGAL-TV CATERBONE ran out of
gas due to another incident of someone stealing his gas. He found only one (1)
person protesting and suggested that the email was a fraud to the person
protesting. 52. On May 22, 2008 and May 27, 2008 respectively, the
United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals GRANTED CATERBONEs Motion for
Extension of Time to file briefs for cases 07-4475 and 07-4474 due to incidents
contained herein. 53. ADDITIONAL ITEMS TO FOLLOW IN
ADDENDUMS. CAUSES OF ACTION BY
DEFENDANTS LANCASTER CITY BUREAU
OF POLICE SECTOR 9 OF THE LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE LANCASTER
CITY BUREAU OF POLICE CHIEF KEITH SADDLER LANCASTER CITY MAYOR RICK
GRAY CITY OF LANCASTER Fraud; Abuse of Process; Libel, Civil Conspiracy,
Barratry; Vexatious litigation; Gross Negligence; Gross Abuse; Harasment;
Obstruction of Justice; Civil Rights Violations; RICO Violations; Anit-Trust Violations;
Theft of Property; Unjust Enrichement. DAMAGES Loss of reputation and credit; humiliation; and
mental suffering. discomfort; injury to health; loss of time; and deprivation of
society with family. Also; economic loss due to business and litigation interruption;
legal fees and punitive damages. Plaintiffs
seeks jury trial and damages in excess of $100,000. JURISDICTION Barratry, in criminal and civil law, is the act or
practice of bringing repeated legal actions solely to harass. Usually, the actions
brought lack merit. This action has been declared a crime in some jurisdictions. For
example, in the U.S. states of California, Pennsylvania, and Virginia, barratry is a
misdemeanor. [1] In England and Wales the offence was abolished in
1967. Malicious prosecution is a common law intentional tort. While
similar to the tort of abuse of process, its elements include (1) intentionally (and
maliciously) instituting or pursuing (or causing to be instituted or pursued) a legal
action (civil or criminal) that is (2) brought without probable cause and (3)
dismissed in favor of the victim of the malicious prosecution. In some jurisdictions,
"malicious prosecution" is reserved for the wrongful initiation of criminal
proceedings, while "malicious use of process" refers to the wrongful initiation of civil
proceedings. Criminal prosecuting attorneys, as well as judges,
are normally protected, by doctrines of prosecutorial immunity and judicial
immunity, from tort liability for malicious prosecution. The mere filing of
a complaint cannot constitute an abuse of process. The parties who have abused or
misused the process, have gone beyond the mere filing of a lawsuit. The taking of
an appeal, even a frivolous one, is not enough to constitute an abuse of process.
The mere filing or maintenance of a lawsuit, even for an improper purpose, is not a
proper basis for an abuse of process action. Abuse of process is a
common law intentional tort. It is to be distinguished from malicious prosecution,
another type of tort that involves misuse of the public right of access to the
courts. The elements of a valid cause of action for abuse of process in
most common law jurisdictions are as follows: it is the malicious and deliberate
misuse or perversion of regularly issued court process (civil or criminal) not justified
by the underlying legal action. "Process" in this context is used in the same sense
as in "service of process," where "process" refers to an official summons or other
notice issued from a court. The person who abuses process is interested only in
accomplishing some improper purpose that is collateral to the proper object of the
process and that offends justice, such as an unjustified arrest or an unfounded
criminal prosecution. Subpoenas to testify, attachments of property, executions on
property, garnishments, and other provisional remedies are among the types of
"process" considered to be capable of abuse. http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O998-vexatious.html Vexatious litigation is legal action which is brought, regardless of its
merits, solely to harass or subdue an adversary. It may take the form of a primary
frivolous lawsuit or may be the repetitive, burdensome, and unwarranted filing of
meritless motions in a matter which is otherwise a meritorious cause of action.
Filing vexatious litigation is considered an abuse of the judicial process and may
bring down sanctions on the offender. A single action, even a frivolous
one, is not enough to raise a litigant to the level of being declared vexatious. Roy L.
Pearson, Jr., an Administrative Law Judge in the District of Columbia, who sued a dry-
cleaner for $54 million for allegedly losing a pair of his trousers, is sometimes
claimed to be a vexatious litigant; however, he does not have a history of frivolous
action like the parties normally considered vexatious.[citation needed ]
 In criminal law, fraud is the crime
or offense of deliberately deceiving another in order to damage them usually, to
obtain property or services unjustly. [1] Fraud can be accomplished through the aid
of forged objects. In the criminal law of common law jurisdictions it may be called
"theft by deception," "larceny by trick," "larceny by fraud and deception" or
something similar. Fraud can be committed through many methods,
including mail, wire, phone, and the internet (computer crime and internet
fraud). Fraud, in addition to being a criminal act, is also a type of civil law
violation known as a tort. A tort is a civil wrong for which the law provides a remedy.
A civil fraud typically involves the act of intentionally making a false representation
of a material fact, with the intent to deceive, which is reasonably relied upon by
another person to that person's detriment. A "false representation" can take many
forms, such as: A false statement of fact, known to be false at the time it was
made; A statement of fact with no reasonable basis to make that
statement; A promise of future performance made with an intent, at the
time the promise was made, not to perform as promised; A statement
of opinion based on a false statement of fact; A statement of opinion that the
maker knows to be false; or An expression of opinion that is false, made by one
claiming or implying to have special knowledge of the subject matter of the opinion.
"Special knowledge" in this case means knowledge or information superior to that
possessed by the other party, and to which the other party did not have equal
access. In law, defamation (also called
vilification, slander, and libel) is the communication of a statement that makes a
false claim, expressively stated or implied to be factual, that may harm the
reputation of an individual, business, product, group, government or nation. Slander
refers to spoken comments, while libel refers to any other form of communication
such as written words or images. Most jurisdictions allow legal actions, civil and/or
criminal, to deter various kinds of defamation and retaliate against groundless
criticism. Related to defamation is public disclosure of private facts arises where
one person reveals information which is not of public concern, and the release of
which would offend a reasonable person.[1] "Unlike libel or slander, truth is not a
defense for invasion of privacy."[2] False light laws are
"intended primarily to protect the plaintiff's mental or emotional well-being."[3] If a
publication of information is false, then a tort of defamation might have occurred. If
that communication is not technically false but is still misleading then a tort of false
light might have occurred.[3] Slander and libel The common law origins of defamation lie in the
torts of slander (harmful statement in a transitory form, especially speech) and
libel[4][5] (harmful statement in a fixed medium, especially writing but also a
picture, sign, or electronic broadcast), each of which gives a common law right of
action. "Defamation" is the general term used internationally, and is used in this
article where it is not necessary to distinguish between "slander" and "libel". Libel
and slander both require publication.[6] The fundamental distinction between libel
and slander lies solely in the form in which the defamatory matter is published. If
the offending material is published in some fleeting form, as by spoken words or
sounds, sign language, gestures and the like, then this is slander. If it is published in
more durable form, for example in written words, film, compact disc (CD), DVD,
blogging and the like, then it is considered libel. Criminal defamation Many nations have criminal penalties for defamation
in some situations, and different conditions for determining whether an offense has
occurred. ARTICLE 19, Global Campaign for Free Expression, has published global
maps [2] charting the existence of criminal defamation law across the globe. The
law is used predominantly to defend political leaders or functionaries of the state. In
Britain, the Italian anarchist Errico Malatesta was convicted of criminal libel for
denouncing the Italian state agent Ennio Belelli in 1912. While, in Canada, though
the law has been applied on only six occasions in the past century, all of those
cases involve libellants attached to the state (police officers, judges, prison guards).
In the most recent case, Bradley Waugh and Ravin Gill were charged with criminal
libel for publicly accusing six prison guards of the racially motivated murder of a
black inmate (http://netk.net.au/Canada/Canada15.asp. In Zimbabwe, "insulting the
President" is, by statute, (Public Order and Security Act 2001) a criminal
offense. Defenses Even if a statement is derogatory,
there are circumstances in which such statements are permissible in
law. Truth In many
legal systems, adverse public statements about legal citizens presented as fact
must be proven false to be defamatory or slanderous/libel. Proving adverse, public
character statements to be true is often the best defense against a prosecution for
libel and/or defamation. Statements of opinion that cannot be proven true or false
will likely need to apply some other kind of defense. The use of the defense of
justification has dangers, however; if the defendant libels the plaintiff and then runs
the defense of truth and fails, he may be said to have aggravated the
harm. Another important aspect of defamation is the difference between fact
and opinion. Statements made as "facts" are frequently actionable defamation.
Statements of opinion or pure opinion are not actionable. In order to win damages in
a libel case, the plaintiff must first show that the statements were "statements of
fact or mixed statements of opinion and fact" and second that these statements
were false. Conversely, a typical defense to defamation is that the statements are
opinion. One of the major tests to distinguish whether a statement is fact or opinion
is whether the statement can be proved true or false in a court of law. If the
statement can be proved true or false, then, on that basis, the case will be heard by
a jury to determine whether it is true or false. If the statement cannot be proved
true or false, the court may dismiss the libel case without it ever going to a jury to
find facts in the case. In some systems, however, notably the Philippines,
truth alone is not a defense.[7] Some U.S. statutes preserve historical common law
exceptions to the defense of truth to libel actions. These exceptions were for
statements "tending to blacken the memory of one who is dead" or "expose the
natural defects of one who is alive." [8] It is also necessary in
these ca
e
to show that there is a well-founded public interest in the specific information being
widely known, and this may be the case even for public figures. Public interest is
generally not "that which the public is interested in," but rather that which is in the
interest of the public.[9] [10] See also: Substantial
truth Privilege and malice Privilege provides a complete bar and answer to a
defamation suit, though conditions may have to be met before this protection is
granted. There are two types of privilege in the common law
tradition: "Absolute privilege" has the effect that a statement cannot be sued on
as defamatory, even if it were made maliciously; a typical example is evidence
given in court (although this may give rise to different claims, such as an action for
malicious prosecution or perjury) or statements made in a session of the legislature
(known as 'Parliamentary privilege' in Commonwealth countries). 
"Qualified privilege" may be available to the journalist as a defense in
circumstances where it is considered important that the facts be known in the public
interest; an example would be public meetings, local government documents, and
information relating to public bodies such as the police and fire departments.
Qualified privilege has the same effect as absolute privilege, but does not protect
statements that can be proven to have been made with malicious intent. Other defenses Defenses to claims of
defamation include: Truth is an absolute defense in the United States as
well as in the common law jurisdictions of Canada. In some other countries it is also
necessary to show a benefit to the public good in having the information brought to
light. Statements made in a good faith and reasonable belief that they
were true are generally treated the same as true statements; however, the court
may inquire into the reasonableness of the belief. The degree of care expected will
vary with the nature of the defendant: an ordinary person might safely rely on a
single newspaper report, while the newspaper would be expected to carefully check
multiple sources. Privilege is a defense when witness testimony,
attorneys' arguments, and judges' decisions, rulings, and statements made in court,
or statements by legislators on the floor of the legislature, or statements made by a
person to their spouse, are the cause for the claim. These statements are said to be
privileged and cannot be cause for a defamation claim. Opinion is a
defense recognized in nearly every jurisdiction. If the allegedly defamatory
assertion is an expression of opinion rather than a statement of fact, defamation
claims usually cannot be brought because opinions are inherently not falsifiable.
However, some jurisdictions decline to recognize any legal distinction between fact
and opinion. The United States Supreme Court, in particular, has ruled that the First
Amendment does not require recognition of an opinion privilege. <BR
Fair comment on a matter of public interest, statements made with an honest belief
in their truth on a matter of public interest (official acts) are defenses to a
defamation claim, even if such arguments are logically unsound; if a reasonable
person could honestly entertain such an opinion, the statement is protected.
Verdana"> Consent is an uncommon defense and makes the claim that the
claimant consented to the dissemination of the statement. Innocent
dissemination is a defense available when a defendant had no actual knowledge of
the defamatory statement or no reason to believe the statement was defamatory.
The defense can be defeated if the lack of knowledge was due to negligence. Thus,
a delivery service cannot be held liable for delivering a sealed defamatory letter.
Verdana"> Claimant is incapable of further defamatione.g., the claimant's position
in the community is so poor that defamation could not do further damage to the
plaintiff. Such a claimant could be said to be "libel-proof," since in most
jurisdictions, actual damage is an essential element for a libel claim. In addition to
the above, the defendant may claim that the allegedly defamatory statement is not
actually capable of being defamatoryan insulting statement that does not actually
harm someone's reputation is prima facie not libelous. Special rules
apply in the case of statements made in the press concerning public figures. A
series of court rulings led by New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964)
established that for a public official (or other legitimate public figure) to win a libel
case, the statement must have been published knowing it to be false or with
reckless disregard to its truth, (also known as actual malice). Under United States law, libel generally requires five key elements. The
plaintiff must prove that the information was published, the plaintiff was directly or
indirectly identified, the remarks were defamatory towards the plaintiff's reputation,
the published information is false, and that the defendant is at fault. The
Associated Press estimates that 95% of libel cases involving news stories do not
arise from high-profile news stories, but "run of the mill" local stories like news
coverage of local criminal investigations or trials, or business profiles. Media liability
insurance is available to newspapers to cover potential damage awards from libel
lawsuits. Defamation and freedom of
speech Defamation laws may come into tension with freedom of speech, leading
to censorship or chilling effects where publishers fear lawsuits, or loss of reputation
where individuals have no effective protection against reckless or unfounded
allegations. Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights permits
restrictions on freedom of speech which are necessary for the protection of the
reputation or the rights of others[11]. Jurisdictions resolve this tension in
different ways, in particular in determining where the burden of proof lies when
unfounded allegations are made. The power of the internet to disseminate
comment, which may include malicious comment, has brought a new focus to the
issue. [12] There is a broader consensus against laws which criminalize defamation.
Human rights organizations, and other organizations such as the Council of Europe
and Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, have campaigned against
strict defamation laws which criminalize defamation.[13][14] The European Court of
Human Rights has placed restrictions on criminal libel laws because of the freedom
of expression provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights. One notable
case was Lingens v. Austria (1986). United
States Main article: United States defamation law The origins of US
defamation law pre-date the American Revolution; one famous 1734 case involving
John Peter Zenger established some precedent that the truth should be an absolute
defense against libel charges. (Previous English defamation law had not provided
this guarantee.) Though the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was designed
to protect freedom of the press, for most of the history of the United States, the
Supreme Court neglected to use it to rule on libel cases. This left libel laws, based
upon the traditional common law of defamation inherited from the English legal
system, mixed across the states. The 1964 case New York Times Co. v. Sullivan,
however, dramatically changed the nature of libel law in the United States by
establishing that public officials could win a suit for libel only if they could
demonstrate publishers' "knowledge that the information was false" or that it was
published "with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not". Later Supreme
Court cases dismissed the claim for libel and forbade libel claims for statements
that are so ridiculous to be clearly not true, or are involving opinionated subjects
such as one's physical state of being. Recent cases have addressed defamation law
and the internet. Defamation law in the United States is much less
plaintiff-friendly than its counterparts in European and the Commonwealth
countries, due to the enforcement of the First Amendment. In the United States, a
comprehensive discussion of what is and is not libel or slander is difficult, because
the definition differs between different states, and under federal law. Some states
codify what constitutes slander and libel together into the same set of laws.
Criminal libel is rare or nonexistent, depending on the state. Defenses to libel that
can result in dismissal before trial include the statement being one of opinion rather
than fact or being "fair comment and criticism". Truth is always a defense. Most states recognize that some categories of statements are considered
to be defamatory per se, such that people making a defamation claim for these
statements do not need to prove that the statement was defamatory. An
action for damages brought by one against whom a civil suit or criminal proceeding
has been unsuccessfully commenced without probable cause and for a purpose
other than that of bringing the alleged offender to justice. An action for
malicious prosecution is the remedy for baseless and malicious litigation. It is not
limited to criminal prosecutions, but may be brought in response to any baseless
and malicious litigation or prosecution, whether criminal or civil. The criminal
defendant or civil respondent in a baseless and malicious case may later file this
claim in civil court against the parties who took an active role in initiating or
encouraging the original case. The defendant in the initial case becomes the
plaintiff in the malicious prosecution suit, and the plaintiff or prosecutor in the
original case becomes the defendant. In most states the claim must be filed within a
year after the end of the original case. A claim of malicious
prosecution is atort action. A tort action is filed in civil court to recover money
damages for certain harm suffered. The plaintiff in a malicious prosecution suit
seeks to win money from the respondent as recompense for the various costs
associated with having to defend against the baseless and vexatious
case. The public policy that supports the action for malicious
prosecution is the discouragement of vexatious litigation. This policy must compete
against one that favors the freedom of law enforcement officers, judicial officers,
and private citizens to participate and assist in the administration of
justice. In most jurisdictions an action for malicious prosecution is
governed by the common law. This means that the authority to bring the action lies
in case law from the courts, not statutes from the legislature. Most legislatures
maintain some statutes that give certain persons immunity from malicious
prosecution for certain acts. In Colorado, for example, a merchant, a merchant's
employee, or a police officer, who reasonably suspects that a theft has occurred,
may detain and question the suspect without fear of liability for slander, false
arrest, false imprisonment, unlawful detention, or malicious prosecution (Colo. Rev.
Stat. Ann. 18-4-407 [West 1996]). An action for malicious
prosecution is distinct from an action for false arrest or false imprisonment. If a
person is arrested by a police officer who lacks legal authority for the arrest, the
proper remedy is an action for false arrest. If a person is confined against her or his
will, the proper remedy is an action for false imprisonment. An action for malicious
prosecution is appropriate only where the judicial system has been
misused. Elements of Proof To win a suit for malicious prosecution, the plaintiff
must prove four elements: (1) that the original case was terminated in favor of the
plaintiff, (2) that the defendant played an active role in the original case, (3) that
the defendant did not have probable cause or reasonable grounds to support the
original case, and (4) that the defendant initiated or continued the initial case with
an improper purpose. Each of these elements presents a challenge to the
plaintiff. The Original Case Was Terminated in Favor of the
Plaintiff The original
case must end before the defendant or respondent in that case may file a malicious
prosecution suit. This requirement is relatively easy to prove. The original case
qualifies as a prosecution if the defendant or respondent had to appear in court. The
original case need not have gone to trial: it is enough that the defendant or
respondent was forced to answer to a complaint in court. If the original case is being
appealed, it is not considered terminated, and the defendant or respondent must
wait to file a malicious prosecution suit. To proceed with a
malicious prosecution claim, the plaintiff must show that the original case was
concluded in her or his favor. Generally, if the original case was a criminal
prosecution, it must have been dismissed by the court, rejected by the grand jury,
abandoned by the prosecutor, or decided in favor of the accused at trial or on
appeal. If the original case was a civil suit, the respondent must have won at trial, or
the trial court must have disposed of the case in favor of the respondent (now the
plaintiff). If recovery by the plaintiff in a civil action was later reversed on appeal,
this does not mean that the action was terminated in favor of the respondent.
However, if the plaintiff in the original case won by submitting fabricated evidence
or by other fraudulent activity, a reversal on such grounds may be deemed a
termination in favor of the respondent. A settlement between the plaintiff and the
respondent in a civil suit is not a termination in favor of the respondent. Likewise,
courts do not consider a plea bargain in a criminal case to be a termination in favor
of the defendant. The Defendant Played an Active
Role in the Original Case In a malicious prosecution suit, the plaintiff must
prove that the defendant played an active role in procuring or continuing the
original case. The plaintiff must prove that the defendant did more than simply
participate in the original case. False testimony alone, for example, does not
constitute malicious prosecution. Moreover, witnesses are immune from suit for
defamation, even if they lie on the witness stand. This is because the concept of a
fair and free trial requires that witnesses testify without fear of having to defend a
defamation suit owing to their testimony. <BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
prosecution focuses on the abuse of legal process, not on defamatory, untruthful
statements. If a person helps another person launch a baseless case or takes action
to direct or aid such a case, the first person may be held liable for malicious
prosecution. The defendant must have been responsible in some way for the
institution or continuation of the baseless case. This position of responsibility does
not always include criminal prosecutors and civil plaintiffs. For example, if a
prosecutor bringing criminal charges is tricked into prosecuting the case by an
untruthful third party, the deceiving party is the one who may be found liable for
malicious prosecution, not the prosecutor. The
Defendant Did Not Have Probable Cause to Support the Original Case The plaintiff
must prove that the person who began or continued the original case did not have
probable cause to do so. Generally, this means proving that the person did not have
a reasonable belief in the plaintiff's guilt or liability. In examining this element, a
court will look at several factors, including the reliability of any sources, the
availability of information, the effort required to obtain information, opportunities
given to the accused to offer an explanation, the accused's reputation, and the
necessity in the original case for speedy judicial action. A failure to fully
investigate the facts surrounding a case may be sufficient to prove a lack of
probable cause. The termination of the original case in favor of the original
defendant (now the plaintiff) may help to prove a lack of probable cause, but it may
not be decisive on the issue. The plaintiff should present enough facts to allow a
reasonable person to infer that the defendant acted without a reasonable belief in
the plaintiff's guilt or liability in beginning or continuing the original case. In a
criminal case, an acquittal does not constitute a lack of probable cause. A criminal
defendant stands a better chance of proving lack of probable cause if the original
case was dismissed by prosecutors, a grand jury, or the court before the case went
to trial. The criminal process provides several safeguards against prosecutions that
lack probable cause, so a full criminal trial tends to show the presence of probable
cause. Civil cases do not have the same safeguards, so a full civil trial does not tend
to prove probable cause. The Defendant Initiated or
Continued the Original Case with an Improper Purpose In a malicious prosecution,
the plaintiff must prove with specific facts that the defendant instituted or continued
the original proceeding with an improper purpose. Sheer ill will constitutes an
improper purpose, and it may be proved with facts that show that the defendant
resented the plaintiff or wanted somehow to harm the plaintiff. However, the
plaintiff does not have to prove that the defendant felt personal malice or hostility
toward the plaintiff. Rather, the plaintiff need only show that the defendant was
motivated by something other than the purpose of bringing the plaintiff to
FAMILY: Verdana">Few defendants admit to improper purposes, so improper purpose
usually must be inferred from facts and circumstances. If the plaintiff cannot
discover any apparent purpose, improper purpose can be inferred from the lack of
probable cause. Hodges v. Gibson Products Co. Hodges v. Gibson
Products Co., 811 P.2d 151 (Utah 1991), contained all the elements of a malicious
prosecution. According to Chad Crosgrove, the manager of Gibson Discount Center
in West Valley, Utah, store money was noticed missing during the afternoon of
September 4, 1981. Both Crosgrove and part-time bookkeeper Shauna Hodges had
access to the money, and both denied taking it. On September 9 Crosgrove and
Gibson officials went to the local police station, where they lodged an accusation of
theft against Hodges. Crosgrove was not accused. Hodges was arrested,
handcuffed, and taken to jail. After a preliminary hearing, she was released on bail
and ordered to return for trial on May 12, 1982. After Hodges was formally
charged, an internal audit at Gibson revealed that Crosgrove had embezzled
approximately $9,000 in cash and goods from the store. The thefts had occurred
over a time period that included September 4, 1981. Gibson still did not charge
Crosgrove with theft. Instead, it allowed him to resign with a promise to repay the
money. The night before Hodges's trial was to begin, and almost two
months after Crosgrove's embezzlement was discovered, management at Gibson
notified Hodges's prosecutor of Crosgrove's activities. The prosecutor immediately
dropped the charges against Hodges. Hodges then filed a suit for malicious
prosecution against Gibson and against Crosgrove. At trial Hodges was able
to prove all the elements of malicious prosecution to the jury's satisfaction: (1) She
had been subjected to prosecution for theft, and the matter had been terminated in
her favor. (2) She had sued the correct parties, because Gibson and Crosgrove were
responsible for instituting the original proceedings against her. (3) She had ample
evidence that the original prosecution was instituted without probable cause,
because Gibson failed to investigate Crosgrove until after she had been arrested,
and because the prosecutor dismissed the charges against her. (4) Finally, there
were enough facts for the jury to infer that both Gibson and Crosgrove had acted
with improper motive: Gibson had acted with an apparent bias against Hodges, and
Crosgrove apparently had accused Hodges for self-preservation. The jury awarded
Hodges a total of $88,000 in damages: $77,000 from Gibson, and $11,000 from
Crosgrove. The verdict was upheld on appeal. Damages The plaintiff in an action for malicious prosecution
can recover money from the defendant for certain harms suffered. Typical injuries
include loss of reputation and credit, humiliation, and mental suffering. If the
original action was a criminal case, additional harms often include discomfort, injury
to health, loss of time, and deprivation of society with family. If
the plaintiff suffered an economic loss directly related to the original action, the
plaintiff can also recover the amount lost. This includes attorneys' fees and court
costs incurred by the plaintiff in defending the original case. Finally, the
plaintiff may recover punitive damages. Punitive damages are imposed by judges
and juries to punish misconduct by a party. Because an action for malicious
prosecution requires proof of improper intent on the part of the defendant, punitive
damages commonly are awarded to malicious prosecution plaintiffs who win
damages awards. Other Considerations Actions for malicious prosecution
must compete against the public interest in allowing parties to pursue cases
unfettered by the specter of a retaliatory case. Very few civil or criminal cases result
in an action for malicious prosecution. This is because it is difficult to prove that the
defendant procured or continued the original case without probable cause and with
an improper purpose. Another difficulty for the plaintiff in an action for
malicious prosecution is immunity. Generally, the law protects witnesses, police
officers, judges, prosecutors, and lawyers from suit for malicious prosecution.
Witnesses are given immunity because justice requires that they testify without fear
of reprisals. Law enforcement and judicial officers are given immunity because they
must be free to perform their duties without continually defending against malicious
prosecution cases. There are exceptions. If a law enforcement or
judicial official ventures outside the bounds of official duties to instigate or continue
a malicious prosecution, the official may be vulnerable to a malicious prosecution
suit. For example, a prosecutor who solicits fabricated testimony to present to a
grand jury may be sued for malicious prosecution. The prosecutor would receive
only limited immunity in this instance because the solicitation of evidence is an
administrative function, not a prosecutorial function (Buckley v. Fitzsimmons, 509
U.S. 259, 113 S. Ct. 2606, 125 L. Ed. 2d 209 [1993]). Private parties may also at
times enjoy immunity from actions for malicious prosecution. For example, a person
who complains to a disciplinary committee about an attorney may be immune. This
general rule is followed by courts to avoid discouraging the reporting of complaints
against attorneys Date: June 6, 2008
Verdana">Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se 1250 Fremont Street CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE SECTOR 9 OF THE LANCASTER
CITY BUREAU OF POLICE LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE CHIEF KEITH
SADDLER 39 West Chestnut
Street Lancaster, PA 17603 LANCASTER
MAYOR RICK GRAY CITY OF LANCASTER City of Lancaster 120 N. Duke Street P.O. Box
Verdana">Lancaster, PA 17608-1599 (717)291-4711 </DIV> 
V. COUNTO OF LANCASTER 08-02983
<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: center">IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVNIA CATERBONE and ADVANCED MEDIA
GROUP (Plaintiffs) v. COUNTY OF LANCASTER, et. al.,
(Defendants) Case No. 08-cv-02983</DIV>
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">ORDER of October 10, 2008 by U.S. District Court
Judge Mary A. McLaughlin - (Case will be re-filed upon resolving problems of
obstruction of justice and due process (computer hacking, thefts, harassments,
etc.,)
_____________________________________________________________________
<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify"> AND NOW comes
Plaintiff, Stanley J. Caterbone, as pro se, and respectfully avers as follows:
Petitioner, Stanley J. Caterbone, resides at 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA,
registered in Pennsylvania with its principal place of business in Pennsylvania.
Petitioner files a CIVIL COMPLAINT against the DEFENDANTS named in the above
caption on this 6th day of June 2008 in the Untied States District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania. This complaint is filed under duress. Date: June 6, 2008 Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro
Se Litigant 1250 Fremont Street Lancaster, PA 17603 CIVIL COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION 1. This civil
complaint involves 28 false arrests and 28 malicious prosecutions that occurred in
the County of Lancaster, and the Commonwealth Pennsylvania, between January of
2005 and May of 2008. The PLAINTIFF, Stanley J. Caterbone and Advanced Media
Group, (CATERBONE) alleges and will prove that the false arrests and false
detentions and false imprisonments were used as a means of intimidation and
retaliation for previous Federal Civil Complaints filed in the U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania on May 16, 2005, Case No. 05-2288, Petition for
Chapter 11 Bankruptcy protection case number 05-23059 filed on May 23, 2005,
and CATERBONES pending Federal False Claims Act complaint involving Lancaster
based International Signal & Control, Plc., (ISC), and other civil complaints filed
in the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. 2. The affiants, the
Lancaster County District Attorneys Office, and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
have forced CATERBONE into vexatious litigation in order to defend himself before
the courts causing irreparable loss of time, countless hours of litigation as pro se,
and loss of income during the past 3 years with excessive legal fees as pro
se. 3. CATERBONE has also notified the respective Clerks of Courts of the
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas; the Pennsylvania Superior Court; the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; and the United
States Third Circuit Court of Appeals of the mismanagement of court records, trial
transcripts, and filings that upon close inspection show a pattern of malice and
corruption at all levels in order to support the original false arrests and malicious
prosecutions. 4. The false arrests and malicious prosecutions have also
been used to support a fabricated, malicious, and calculated misdiagnosis of mental
illness, all in an effort to discredit his legal and legitimate claims and allegations in
the courts and to public officials. 5. CATERBONE has also filed
numerous complaints with the Pennsylvania Judicial Review Board in Harrisburg
during the last 2 years. All complaints have fallen on deaf ears and the Pennsylvania
Judicial Review Board was negligent in not warning certain judges of their conduct,
especially the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judges that selectively
denied In Forma Pauperis applications on baseless grounds without ever writing the
cause or reason of the denial on the ORDER, which is in violation of the
Pennsylvania Rules of Procedure. Complaints were also filed against Magisterial
District Justices for filing false arrests and malicious prosecutions. This abuse of
process allowed the courts to deny CATERBONE due process of the law and deny
certain civil complaints to be filed. 6. CATERBONE and
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP have suffered irreparable harm to its reputation and to
its efforts to continue its business operations while as a petitioner in a Chapter 11
Reorganization Plan filed on May 23, 2005 in the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the Eastern District as case no. 05-23059. 7. CATERBONE and
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP were also continuing a decade long investment in
projects located in the Downtown Lancaster Investment District that have been
maliciously sabotaged with ease due to the gross abuse; negligence; and abuse of
process of the Lancaster City Bureau of Police coupled with the false arrests and the
malicious prosecutions. Three main projects include a UPS Shipping and Copy Store
(CATERBONE retains an exclusivity agreement with UPS); Excelsior Place Business
Plan; and the Downtown Theater at Hotel Brunswick . CATERBONE and the
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP have been an active advocate and supporter of the
Downtown Lancaster Convention Center and the revitalization of Downtown
Lancaster and have demonstrated a record of support and advocacy through its
meeting and communications with major stakeholders, public officials, and
attendance at public meetings. In November of 2007, CATERBONE and the
Advanced Media Group went public with their Downtown Lancaster investments and
business plans that were culminated over the past 9 years. The Advanced Media
Group also formerly and publicly introduced their Downtown Lancaster Action Plan
via handouts, websites, and blogs; and began meetings and negotiations with major
stakeholders, City of Lancaster Public Officials, Developers, and
investors. 8. CATERBONE has formerly applied to be on the Lancaster
Convention Center Authority Board of Directors in 2007 and has petitioned for a
seat on the Lancaster County Government Study Group in 2006. 9. In
March of 1988 the following charges by Detective Larry Mathias and the Manheim
Township Police Department and Lancaster County Assistant District Attorney
Donald Totaro were dismissed in the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas for
the arrests of September 3, 1987 and are named in U.S. District Court Case No. 05-
2288, now pending before the courts: cc3304a2 Criminal Mischief - F3 Nolle Prossed
/ Withdrawn; Cc3502 Burglary - F1 Quashed / Dismis / Demur Sus; cc3701al Robbery
- F1 Quashed /Dismis /Demur Sus; cc3921a Theft By Unlwf Taking Or Dispo F3 Nolle
Pros / Withdrawn; cc3933a1 Unlawful Use Of Computer - F3 Nolle Pros /Withdrawn;
Cc3933a2 Unlawful Use Of Computer - F3 Quashed / Disnis / Demur Sus; cc2706
Terroristic Threats - M1 Quashed / Dismis / Demur Sus; cc2902-1 Unlawful Restraint -
M1 Quashed / Dismis / Demur Sus. 10. In 1997 CATERBONE had
solicited Attorney Christina Rainville of Philadelphia and pro bono attorney for Lisa
Michelle Lambert in the Laurie Show murder case. The murder trials and appeals of
the Lambert case demonized Ms. Christina Rainville and U.S. District Court Judge
Stewart Dalzell. After CATERBONE submitted documents and audio recordings, Ms.
Christina Rainville had communicated with CATERBONE that she was not able to
take his case due to the fact that her Philadelphia law firm had banned her from
taking on any more Lancaster County residents, despite the fact that many more
sought her legal counsel. On December 31, 1997, CATERBONE had also personally
delivered a CD-ROM to the chambers of U.S. District Court Judge Stewart Dalzell in
an effort to bring attention to his case. In May of 1998 CATERBONE submitted an
AFFADAVIT to the law firm of Schneider and Harrison outlining the prosecutorial
misconduct or Finding of Facts of the 1987 cover-up for Ms. Christina Rainville.
CATERBONE alleges that these facts were part of the attitude and the motives for
the law enforcement-at-large of Lancaster County and the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania to ignore the rule of law and procedure in order to bring these false
arrests and malicious prosecutions. The Lancaster County community-at-large had
the same attitude toward CATERBONE. The Lambert case received national
notoriety when U.S. District Judge Stuart Dalzell freed Lambert on a Habeus Corpus
appeal hearing citing she was actually innocent beyond a reasonable doubt. Judge
Dalzell was quoted in chambers as saying, "I can tell you, Mr. Madenspacher, that
I've thought about nothing else but this case for over three weeks, and in my
experience, sir, and I invite you to disabuse me of this at oral argument, I want you
and I want the Schnader firm to look for any case in any jurisdiction in the English-
speaking world where there has been as much prosecutorial misconduct, because I
haven't found it. The case was covered by a 3 part series in the Los Angeles Times
by writer Barry Seigel on November 10, 1997 and a television episode on the
A&E Network American Justice Series. The Lancaster community gathered over
37,000 signatures on a petition to impeach U.S. District Judge Stewart Dalzell for his
rulings. In the end, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania took control of the case and
appealed the ruling that freed Lambert sending her back to prison. The case went
all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court in 2005, after being denied any review. The
case accentuated the rights of Federal Law vs. State Law and the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania solicited a team of attorney generals from across the nation to help
their cause. CATERBONE attended a hearing before Judge Larry Stengel in the
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas and to this day, due to his knowledge and
experience with the Lancaster County Judicial System and Law Enforcement
believes the case should have never been conducted without a jury trial, and that
the over zealous prosecution proves that prosecutorial misconduct was never
thoroughly investigated or prosecuted in the Lambert case. CATERBONE will not let
that happen in his cases. CAUSES OF
ACTION 11. On December 5, 2006 the charge of 18 3926 A4 Theft Of
Services-Acquisition Of Services and 18 2709 A7 Harassment - Comm. Repeat In
Another Manner (LC); Docket No. CP-36-CR-0002843-2006, were both Withdrawn
(Lower Court) during trial court. Officer Bezzerd of the East Lampeter Police
Department, the affiant, arrested CATERBONE at the Brasserie Restaurant and Bar
on Lincoln Highway East in Lancaster, Pennsylvania and falsely detained
CATERBONE at the East Lampeter Police Station for several hours. The Lancaster
County District Attorney and the East Lampeter Police Department had made a
commitment in writing during a preliminary hearing before MDJ Reuter of Mount Joy
Township to file the charge by December of 2005, but breached their commitment
and resurrected the charges of October 6, 2005 on May 18, 2006 after the Southern
Regional Police failed to obtain any treatment or commitment for CATERBONE
during a 5-day evaluation from a 302 commitment to Lancaster General Hospital on
April 5, 2006. The two other charges of disorderly conduct and harassment were
improperly adjudicated and upon review of the record and trail court transcripts it is
clear there was abuse of process, perjury, and other criminal and ethical violations.
CATERBONE also alleges that the East Lampeter Police Department charges were
retaliation for the AFFIDAVIT CATERBONE submitted to Attorney Christina Rainville in
1998 of Prosecutorial Misconduct in the case of Lisa Michelle Lambert. East
Lampeter Township Police were the original Affiants in the Lambert case.
Verdana"> 12. On January 23 2007 before MDJ Simms the following charges
were dismissed: 285-21d No Parking Or Stopping Permitted Withdrawn (Lower
Court); 285-30a Meter Violation Withdrawn (Lower Court); 18 6501 A1 Scatter
Rubbish Upon Land/Stream Etc Dismissed (Lower Court) Docket No. NT-0000598-06.
On April 16, 2006 Officer David K. Hershiser of the Lancaster City Bureau of Police
responded to the Marion Court Bar and Restaurant in Lancaster City on a 911 call by
CATERBONE. CATERBONE had called 911 after a security person of the
establishment was harassing CATERBONE. Rather than investigate CATERBONES
allegations, Officer Hershiser began to harass CATERBONE while detaining him at
the scene. CATERBONE attempted to give Officer HERSHISER his business card of
Advanced Media Group by holding out his hand. Officer Hershiser let the business
card drop to the ground and charged CATERBONE with 18 6501 A1 Scatter
Rubbish Upon Land/Stream Etc. 13. On January 18, 2007 the following charges
were dismissed at trial by MDJ Isaac J. Stoltzfus at Intercourse, Pennsylvania: Docket
No. TR-0002184-06 75 1543 A Driv While Oper Priv Susp Or Revoked Not Guilty
and Docket No. TR-0002183-06 Oper Veh W/O Req'd Financ Resp Not Guilty. On
August 30, 2006 Officer Michael K. Schaeffer and another officer of the Millersville
Boro Police Department pulled CATERBONE over on Wabank Road in Lancaster
Township, Pennsylvania without probable cause, as determined by MDJ Stoltzfus.
Officer Schaeffer detained CATERBONE for approximately 1 and a half hours,
revoked his Pennsylvania Drivers License, and impounded his 2005 Honda Odyssey
to the St. Denis Towing Company. The 2005 Honda Odyssey contained legal
documents and evidence of his litigation. St. Denis Towing Company loaded the
Honda Odyseey on the tow truck and drove CATERBONE in the tow truck to 1250
Fremont Street, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 1 mile away. CATERBONE emptied out the
Honda Odyssey while it was still loaded on the tow truck. CATERBONE had a AC/DC
converter in the Honda Odyssey and was using a laptop and a printer to file court
filings due to the fact that Pennsylvania Power and Light had illegally turned off his
electricity to 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, Pennsylvania on July 26, 2006 .
CATERBONE was left without his Pennsylvania Driving Privileges for the next seven
months without reason or cause. The St. Denise Towing Company demanded a cash
payment to tow the car back to 1250 Fremont Street, approximately 1 mile from the
location of the arrest, which CATERBONE did not have. The towing charge was
$25.00 for the tow from the location of the illegal stop and false arrest to 1250
Fremont Street, CATERBONEs temporary residence, owned by his mother Yolanda
Caterbone (who had moved to Florida in December of 2004). CATERBONE tried to
negotiate payment at a later date, and St. Denis refused. The 2005 Honda Odyssey
was towed to the St. Denis Towing Companys yard and held at a rate of $25.00 per
day. CATERBONE asked if there was a weekly discount rate, and there was not
discounted rate. On October 30, 2006, CATERBONE was falsely imprisoned at the
Lancaster County Prison until December 28, 2006 . MDJ Stoltzfus had instructed
CATERBONE on January 18, 2007 at trial to communicate with the Pennsylvania
Department of Transportation to get his drivers license back. After several
unsuccessful communications, both by certified mail and by telephone, CATERBONE
solicited the help of the Lancaster office of Pennsylvania State Representative
Michael Sturla, who had successfully negotiated the return of CATERBONEs
Pennsylvania Drivers License in March of 2007. CATERBONE also was not able to
attend a Hearing in Federal Bankruptcy Court in Reading Pennsylvania on August
31, 2007, the day immediately following the illegal arrest and impound of his
vehicle. CATERBONE had missed at least one other Hearing in Federal Bankruptcy
Court in Reading, Pennsylvania. There was no public transportation available. The
false arrest and illegal revocation of his Pennsylvania drivers license and the illegal
impound of his vehicle made it impossible for CATERBONE to litigate in Federal
courts in Reading, Pennsylvania and Philadelphia Pennsylvania without incurring
substantial costs for transportation. CATERBONE had no cash available for
transportation. For the next seven months CATERBONE was left with walking, riding
a bicycle, or taking a Red Rose Transit bus to and from the Lancaster County
Courthouse for all of the vexation litigation that would follow during the next
eighteen months. Even as important, it left CATERBONE without receiving his mail
on a daily basis. The Conestoga Post Office and Postal Office Manager refused to
forward CATERBONES mail to the Millersville Post Office, which was only 3 or 4
miles from CATERBONES 1250 Fremont Street temporary residence. The Conestoga
Post Office would only forward certified letters and parcels to the Millersville Post
Office . The Millersville Post Office also had public transportation available from
1250 Fremont Street via Red Rose Transit Authority. Instead, once a week,
CATERBONE had to ride his bicycle from 1250 Fremont Street to 220 Stone Hill Road,
Conestoga, Pa in order to retrieve his mail. The 7 mile ride was treacherous with
long hills and steep inclines, hard for even professionals to master. CATERBONE was
unable to legal change his address because of his litigation and challenge to the
foreclosure by Fulton Bank . 14. On April 30, 2007, CATERBONE, as pro se,
appeared and litigated at Summary Appeal Trials at the Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas Docket No. CP-36-CR 0000028-2007, and was successful in
overturning the previous convictions of the following charges: 18 5503 A4/
Disorder Conduct Hazardous/Physi Off Not Guilty Docket No. filed by Officer
Michener of the Southern Regional Police Department on ; 18 5507 A /
Obstruction Highways Not Guilty filed by Officer Michener of the Southern Regional
Police Department on ; 18 2709 A3 Harassment - Course Of Conduct W/No Legiti
Purpose Nollle Pros filed by Officer Michener of the Southern Regional Police
Department on ; 75 3111 A / Disregard Traffic Control Device Not Guilty Nolle
Pros filed by Officer Burger of the Southern Regional Police Department on. All of
these charges, with exception to the 75 3111 A / Disregard Traffic Control Device
stemmed from the incidents at the Conestoga Post Office in Conestoga Township
. 15. On May 10, 2007 during Criminal Trial before the case was
continued the following offenses were nolle prossed M2 18 5104 Resist
Arrest/Other Law Enforce 08/04/2006 K4775120 and M1 18 908 A Make
Rep/Sell/Etc Off Weap 08/04/2006 K4775120 Nolle Pros Docket No. CP-36-CR-
0004771-2006. 16. On November 1, 2007 at approximately 8:40am before
Call of the trial List in the Courtroom of President Judge Louis J. Farina, CATERBONE
filed a Motion for Acquittal of the DUI charges as pro se. At approximately 10:00 am
the Assistant Lancaster County District Attorney Deborah Muzereus moved to nolle
prossed S 75 3714 A Careless Driving 08/04/2006 Nolle Pros and 75 3802 A1
DUI: Gen Imp/Inc of Driving Safely Nolle Pros Docket No. CP-36-CR-0004771-2006
were both nolle prossed. 17. On May 2, 2008 the following charge was
dismissed 285-89 Street Cleaning Citation/ Dismissed. 18. From October
30, 2006 until December 29, 2008 CATERBONE was falsely imprisoned at the
Lancaster County Prison. CATERBONE, in a hand written document while
incarcerated, appealed a decision to reinstate a revoked bail bond to secured rather
than unsecured that was ORDERED by Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas
Judge Allison on November 1, 2006. 19. CATERBONE appealed
the ORDER and Judge Allison denied his appeal. 20. On December 2, 2006
CATERBONE filed an Appeal for Reconsideration and was GRANTED his freedom on
December 28, 2006 in an ORDER by Judge Allison that released CATERBONE on the
following day, December 29, 2008. The following are the circumstances and are
actual causes from that appeal. 21. On October 30, 2006 at approximately
2:00 pm at the residence of Yolanda Caterbone at 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster,
Pennsylvania, CATERBONE was apprehended by (2) PA Constables. 22. The
apprehension began when (1) PA Constable who did not identify himself and was in
old street clothes began pounding on the door and ringing the door bell while also
turning the door knob trying to break into the residence. The PA Constable was a
black male. 23. CATERBONE stood about 15 feet from the door and
watched the PA Constable on his color video surveillance monitor and began to fear
the unknown intruder. CATERBONE did not have a phone.<BR
After about 10 minutes the PA Constable stopped and retreated away from the door
to the door to the side of 1252 Fremont Street to confer with another PA Constable
while CATERBONE watched. He noticed another PA Constable at the rear of 1250
Fremont Street. 25. For the first time CATERBONE determined that the (2)
PA Constables were (2) constables or Police Detectives. Lancaster City Police Officer
James McVey promised CATERBONE during a meeting at the Lancaster City Police
Station that Detectives would be contacting him to investigate computer hacking
and the theft of confidential legal papers at 1250 Fremont Street. CATERBONE
reported multiple times to law enforcement that computer hackers were destroying
and or downloading files and removing dates of court hearings on CATERBONEs
electronic calendars on the computer and portable Ipod. 26. CATERBONE
went out the front door to confront the (2) men and was immediately placed under
handcuffs and escorted to a vehicle. The (2) PA Constables had no identification
visible that was visible and there were several neighbors outside their houses
watching. 27. The (2) PA Constables, identified as Weinholdt and Williams
(black male), transported CATERBONE to MDJ Leo Eckert Jr.s office and was very
hostile and prejudiced towards CATERBONEs innocence. 28. CATERBONE
arrived at MDJ Eckerts office at 841 Stehman Road, Millersville, Pennsylvania,
17551, (717) 872-4367. Weinholdt made a remark about that a Southern Regional
Police cruiser was already in MDJ Eckerts parking lot. Upon Weinholdt parking
CATERBONE refused to get out of the vehicle until the Constables would verify that
Southern Regional Police Sgt. Busser was not inside MDJ Eckerts office. CATERBONE
explained the prior incidents of abuse against Busser and his fear of being in his
presence. Williams went into the office and confirmed that the Southern Regional
Policemen was not Sgt. Busser. 29. CATERBONE was placed into a holding cell
for approximately 20-30 minutes. CATERBONE was then escorted to the office of
MDJ Eckert, Jr. with Williams, Weinhodt, and an unidentified Southern Regional
Policeman present. The Southern Regional Police Department Officer was not Adam
Cramer or Officer Fedor. 30. CATERBONE signed not guilty pleas to the
following citations: A) Docket No. NT-000561-06 Filed on 08/07/2006 For
5503 A4 Disorderly Conduct B) Docket No. NT-000569-06 Filed
on 08/11/2006 for S18 2709 A3 Harassment C) Docket No. NT-000562-06 Filed
on 08/07/2006 for S18 A Obstructing Highway and or Public Passages
Verdana">D) Docket No. 0002184-06 Filed on 09/05/2006 for 75 1786 A
Driving under suspension. E) Docket No. TR-0002183-06 Filed on 09/05/2006 S
75 1786 Driving without required financial responsibility. 32. CATERBONE explained
to MDJ Eckert, Jr. that he was confused by his paperwork from his office and was
waiting on hearing dates for the offenses. CATERBONE also demanded copies of his
entire cases from his office a month or so earlier without success.<BR
CATERBONE declared his indigent status and his In Forma Pauperis status in the
Court of Common Pleas, The Superior Court of Pennsylvania, and the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. CATERBONE also cited his
food stamps and his Chapter 11 Bankruptcy as proof. . MDJ Eckert, Jr., questioned
his financial disclosure and insisted CATERBONE had more cash holdings than
CATERBONEs Nineteen Dollars and Thirty-Four Cents ($19.34) in his pocket. MDJ
Eckert, Jr., informed CATERBONE that he was going to jail until and Indigent Hearing
could be held in Ten (10) days. CATERBONE was taken back to the holding cell, in
handcuffs. 34. While being placed in the holding cell, MDJ Eckert, Jr., made
disparaging and incriminating remarks about the U.S. District case no. 06-cv-4650
and CATERBONEs suit against him and other Lancaster County District Magistrates
Judges. He said Well since you filed a suit against every District Magistrate in
Lancaster County, well have to send you to Dauphin County. 35. At
approximately 5:00 pm on October 30, 2006, CATERBONE was transported to
Lancaster County Prison. 36. CATERBONE was issued a Detainer on
October 31, 2006 for the $1,610.00 and was committed for Bail Not
Posted. 37. The Detainer listed CATERBONEs address as 1230 Fremont
Street, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, rather than 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga,
Pennsylvania. It also listed the wrong social security number as 200-46-1959 and
the wrong middle name as Jay instead of Joseph. 38. On October 30, 2006, a
second Detainer and Bench Warrant was issued by Officer Adam Cramer of the
Southern Regional Police Department Warrant No. 36-BW-0002823-2006 and Docket
No. CP-36-CR-00004771-2006. 39. The Detainer listed the reason for the
Detainer as The Bail Administration revoked the bail and issued a Bench Warrant:
(Revoked Bail was issued at $5,000.00 unsecured with non-monetary
conditions). 40. On November 1st, 2006, CATERBONE had a Hearing
before the Honorable Judge Paul K. Allison, as stated in a mandatory 72 hour
hearing clause 41. The Assistant Attorney disclosed that the disclosed to
the Honorable Judge Allison that CATERBONE failed to attend a meeting with the
Bail Administrator. CATERBONE objected, as a pro se litigant, that on October 20th ,
2006, CATERBONE attended a meeting with the Bail Administrator and that
CATERBONE was given an appointment by the receptionist for another meeting for
November 6th, 2006 at 10:00 am on a pink slip of paper. </DIV>
<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify"> 42. The Assistant District Attorney stated that CATERBONE failed to
appear another time on October 17th, 2006. CATERBONE responded that he did in
fact attend that meeting and even signed the Agreement of Conditions and let it
on the desk of Ms. Morales before leaving. Another staff member of the Bail
Administration Office was agitating CATERBONE. 43. The Honorable Judge
Allison reinstated the bail at $5,000.00 secured rather then unsecured as previously
executed with the Honorable MDJ Commins on Giest Road, Leola,
Pennsylvania. 44. CATERBONE was removed from the Courtroom unaware
of the difference in a hastily fashion without an opportunity for an explanation or an
objection as to why CATERBONE was now required to post monetary conditions
when it was proven the meeting (Bail Administrator) was attended as prescribed in
the Bail Bond Agreement. 45. On November 4th, 2006, CATERBONE filed an
appeal for reconsideration before the Honorable Judge Paul K. Allison to reinstate
and reset bail as unsecured. 46. CATERBONE is also alleging prosecutorial
misconduct and other retaliatory tactics by the Southern Regional Police
Department and Officer Adam Cramer when the 2nd Detainer was issued on
October 30, 2006. 47. By October 30th, 2006, CATERBONE was
ordered to amend the Civil Action of Caterbone v. Southern Regional Police
Department et al, in the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County. By 2:00 pm on
October 30th, 2006, CATERBONE had completed the amended complaint and
prepared the filing for the Lancaster County Prothonotary and the Attorney of
Record for the Southern Regional Police Department. 48. CATERBONE did
not want to take the chance of having any problems with traveling to the Lancaster
County Courthouse to file the complaint and was totally unaware of any outstanding
Bench Warrants. CATERBONE decided to ride his bike instead to the United States
Postal Substation in Bausman, Pennsylvania to mail the amended complaint via 1st
class mail. 49. CATERBONE chose the right option to file the amended
compliant via mail. Had the Pennsylvania Constable apprehended CATERBONE prior
to reaching the Bausman Postal Substation, the amended complaint would have
been sitting in the Lancaster County Prison. 50. The financial
implications that the amended complaint has to Conestoga Township has the
potential of costing them hundreds of thousands of dollars as prescribed by
law. 51. CATERBONE alleges that the Southern Regional Police
Department wanted to obstruct CATERBONE by revoking the unsecured bail bond
without a proper reason and prevent the filing of the amended complaint in the
Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania.<BR
Southern Regional Police Department has used a similar criminal tactic on April 5th,
2006, when CATERBONE was enroute to the Lancaster County Courthouse to file the
original civil action against the Southern Regional Police Debarment, et al. Officers
Fedor and Sgt. Busser filed a fraudulent 302 Commitment document and
apprehended CATERBONE prior to reaching the Lancaster County Courthouse and
transporting CATERBONE to the Lancaster General Hospital.<BR
CATERBONE filed the civil action (Southern Regional Police Department) on April
10th, 2006, and against the Lancaster General Hospital. Barley and Snyder, LLC
filed an appearance for the Lancaster General Hospital, et al, but
defaulted. 54. CATERBONE also alleges retaliatory action by Officer Adam
Cramer of the Southern Regional Police Department for the October 20th, 2006
Federal Civil Action (06-cv-4650), which he is a Defendant.<BR
Prosecution, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the Lancaster District
Attorneys Office are also the subject of a Federal False Claims Act regarding
International Signal and Control, PLC., (ISC) and CATERBONEs whistle blowing
activities of 1987. The civil action was filed recently filed on October 20th, 2006, in
the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Both are
also named in the Federal Action of Caterbone v. Lancaster County Prison, et al, with
case no. 05-dv-2288 filed on May 16th, 2005. 56. CATERBONEs
incarceration is suspect to retaliatory prosecution and obstruction of justice and
intimidation regarding several Lancaster County Departments that are Defendants
of a civil action filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania (05-cv-2288; 06-cv-4650; and the Federal False Claims Act of October
20th 2006), There was no reason cited by the Lancaster County District Attorney on
November 1st, 2006, that warrants the downgrading of the unsecured bail bond to a
secured bail bond with monetary conditions.3 57. The Lancaster County
Sheriffs Department, which administrates a portion of the Bail Administration policy
and rules, are also a named defendant in Caterbone v. Lancaster County Prison, et
al, (05-cv-2288) filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania. The Bail Administration employee had committed perjury on
November 1st, 2006, before the Honorable Judge Paul K. Allison<BR
CATERBONE has been at odds with the Lancaster County Commissioners position
and efforts to halt the efforts of the development of the Lancaster County
Convention Center. In 2005, CATERBONE filed a civil action in the Lancaster County
Court of Common Pleas in Project Hope/Advanced Media Group v. Drew Anthon and
the Eden Resorts Inn for the Hoteliers refusal to pay the Lancaster County
Convention Center excise taxes. CATERBONE was a former business partner with S.
Dale High and had a meeting with the Law firm of Nettleton and Finefrock (referred
by former Mayor Charlie Smithgall), and they were of the opinion that CATERBONE
had legal standing and they also disclosed that County Commissioner Richard
Shellenberger had taken a bribe of $200,000.00 to halt the efforts of the Lancaster
County Convention Center. CATERBONE filed a document with the Lancaster County
District Attorneys Office in 2006 alleging bribery. CATERBONE alleges that the
criminal citations and Bench Warrants have been retaliatory and have not allowed
CATERBONE to be in litigation free from conspiracy as a violation of statute 263 42
1985 (2) C, a RICO civil rights violation. 59. The Bench Warrants and
fraudulent incarceration was obstructing CATERBONE from litigating an appeal in
the Pennsylvania Superior Court of Fulton Bank v. Stanley J. Caterbone, which
involved a mortgage foreclosure and a scheduled sheriff sale on December 20th,
2006. Fulton Bank is also a named from 1987 and has been named by the
Honorable Judge Mary McLaughlin of the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania of several causes of actions in case 05-dv-2288 including
being unjustly enriched and a participant in a wrongful death action.<BR
Detainer issued by Officer Adam Cramer of the Southern Regional Police
Department, which was issued because the Bail Administrator revoked the
unsecured bail bond contained the following false statements to authorities:
Verdana"> A) DUI Defendant had a Breathalyzer result of .073 (.08 legal
limit) after consuming mouthwash and had a total of three (3) drinks in three (3) or
more hours. B) Resisting Arrest CATERBONE immediately got out of his
vehicle and raised his arms above his head and stood still. Officer Cramer ordered
CATERBONE into the vehicle and refused to exit until the Pennsylvania Police were
summoned. C) Offensive Weapons CATERBONE had a wood hatchet for
cutting vines behind the passengers seat of his Honda Odyssey van. CATERBONE
used the tool extensively to reduce the vines that smother trees in CATERBONEs
2.5 acre wooded property. D) Careless Driving An unidentified vehicle
was tailing CATERBONE, so he put on his turn signal to turn into the Pine View Dairy
so the vehicle would pass him. Officer Cramer followed and put on his flashing lights
in the driveway. 61. On November 20, 2006 CATERBONE filed 28 U. S. C.
2241 Habeas Corpus Petition Case No. 06-5138 (Challenging the Detainer and
Imprisonment) filed from the Lancaster County Prison on November 14th, 2006. This
case is still pending in The United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania records. 62. On December 5, 2005 while CATERBONE
was falsely imprisoned and detained in the Lancaster County Prison The Lancaster
Intelligencer Journal publishes the Story The Next Sound You Hear regarding
former business partner Tony Bongiovi, which is central to all of the litigation in the
United States District Courts. The worlds of pro audio and consumer electronics
were bridged at New York City's Avatar Studios in December, where Bongiovi
Acoustics unveiled the Digital Power Station car radio. Demonstrated by audio icon
Tony Bongiovi (pictured) in Avatars Studio A (former Power Station Studios), the
patent-pending technology being manufactured by JVC made a very impressive
debut. 63. On December 8th, 2006 CATERBONE files a Writ of Mandamus
against Magisterial District Justice Leo H. Eckert, Jr, and Mary Commins for the
fraudulent activities leading to the false imprisonment of October 30th, 2006, and
Bench Warrants. 64. On December 12th, 2006 CATERBONE files for
Continuances in all of the following Civil Complaints in the Commonwealth Court of
Common Pleas of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania: CI-06-07330; CI-06-08742; CI-06-
08490; CI-06-07376; CI-06-07188; CI-06-06658; CI-06-04939; CI-06-03403; CI-06-
03401; CI-06-03349. O 65. On December 13th, 2006 the Lancaster
County Sheriffs Department and Chief John Fiorill tried to get CATERBONE to
change his address to the Lancaster County Prison and Judge Perezous refused to
get ORDER CATERBONE to comply with the demand and Judge Perezous
CONTINUED the Appeal Hearing because Stan Caterbone did not have any files to
conduct a Trial. 66.December 20th, 2006 the Lancaster County Sheriffs
Department refused CATERBONE to wear his suit into the courtroom, or take his files
into the Pre-Trial Conference before Judge Farina. 67. On December 20th the
Lancaster County Sheriffs Department and Fulton Bank conduct the illegal Sheriff
Sale for 220 Stone Hill Road with NO notification before or after the SALE to
CATERBONE and sold the property to Central Penn Settlement Company of Akron,
Pennsylvania. The Fulton Bank Mortgage Foreclosure was still before the Superior
Court of Pennsylvania. 68. On December 29th, 2006 CATERBONE is
RELEASED from Lancaster County Prison, and walks to the Lancaster County
Courthouse to report to Court Administration and the Prothonotary Office to get a
print out of all of the Civil Dockets for all cases in Civil Court, including the Fulton
Bank Foreclosure and finds out for the first time that the Sheriff Sale on December
20th took place. 69. On January 2, 2007 CATERBONE files and records
(4:09pm) a Petition To Set Aside Sale for 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga in the
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County and personally serves
Fulton Bank and the Lancaster County Sheriffs Department.<BR
January 4th, 2007 CATERBONE visits 220 Stone Hill Road and finds 2 unidentified
individuals on his property loading the entire contents of 220 Stone Hill Road onto 2
moving trucks, to an unidentified location, and is ordered off the Property for
Trespassing. The 2 individuals said they were from Noble Real Estate Company. Mr.
Joseph Caterbone accompanied him as a witness and driver. CATERBONE retrieves
his mail from the Conestoga Post Office from dating back to October 25th, 2006 up
to the present and temporarily forwards mail to 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA.
CATERBONE visits the Lancaster County Sheriff Lt. Lancaster about the incident at
220 Stone Hill Road and is told that Southern Regional Police have already
responded, and would not give any information about the incident. CATERBONE files
and records an Addendum to the Petition To Set Aside Sale for 220 Stone Hill Road,
Conestoga in the Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County and
personally serves Fulton Bank and the Lancaster County Sheriffs Department
regarding the theft of all of his personal possessions, including business files of
Advanced Media Group, and all Legal files and evidentiary assets for all pending
litigation. 71. On January 7th, 2007 CATERBONE files a claim with Harleysville
Insurance Homeowners Policy HOAI 93468 for the theft of his personal possessions
and the property at Stone Hill Road. From the day CATERBONE walked out of the
Lancaster County Prison on December 29, 2006 until April 13, 2007 all of
CATERBONEs possessions were stolen, including every item in his personal
residence and office at 220 Stone Hill Road, and his pickup truck, and every item
stored outside his property, and it was never known who had taken possession or
where it was stored. THIS HAD EFFECTIVELY MADE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO LITIGATE ANY
CASE THAT CATERBONE HAD IN THE COURTS AND TO MAKE MATTERS WORSE NO
ONE WANTED TO HELP TO FIND OUT WHERE THE POSESSIONS WERE TAKEN AND
WHO TOOK THEM. 72. The amount of pain, suffering, and duress
that CATERBONE had endured from the County of Lancaster at this point is not
measurable. 73. On April , 2006 CATERBONE was illegally charged with
75 3733 A, Fleeing and Eluding a Police Officer, docket number CR-0000085-
2006 and CP-36-CR-0003179-2006 by Officer Robert Buser of the Southern Regional
Police Department while Buser was pretending to serve CATERBONE with a
fraudulent 302 Commitment Order to Lancaster General Hospital.<BR
CATERBONE at first was going to defend the charge as pro se. During the first day in
Court on January 3, 2007 CATERBONE did not like the demeanor or the manner of
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge James P. Cullen. CATERBONE then
requested to have co-counsel in order to keep Judge Cullen honest and keep Judge
Cullen from misconduct in the case. Due to a conflict, the Public Defenders Office
referred CATERBONE to Lancaster County Bail Administration and within 30 minutes
Janice Longer, Esq., was summoned to the Lancaster County Courthouse as a Court
Appointed Co-Counsel. Still in court on January 3, 2007 and before Judge Cullen,
CATERBONE did not like the attitude of Janice Longer, Esq., so CATERBONE moved to
have Janice Longer, Esq., take lead counsel and CATERBONE a defendant only .
CATERBONE, Longer, Judge James P. Cullen, and the Lancaster County District
Attorney Office all agreed that the audio recording that CATERBONE had submitted
as evidence would be played at trial for the jury. 75. In March of 2007
CATERBONE filed a complaint against counsel Janice Longer, Esq., before any trial
for the case with the Pennsylvania Supreme Court Disciplinary Board. 76. In
April of 2007 CATERBONE went to trial before a jury before Lancaster County Court
of Common Pleas Judge Dennis Reinaker. Assistant District Attorney Deborah
Muzereus prosecuted the case. After 3 days and approximately 5 hours of
deliberations, the trial was ended in a hung jury. 77. The case went to trial
during the next criminal court date in May of 2007. In this trial Judge James P. Cullen
was the Judge, not Dennis Reinaker as before. During this trial Judge James P. Cullen
would not allow the entire audio recording to be played, nor would he allow the
entrapment defense. Unlike the first jury trial, the jury took only 20 minutes and
found CATERBONE GUILTY of the charge of Fleeing and Eluding a Police
Officer. 78. Judge James P. Cullen ORDERED a Pre Sentence Investigation
and a Psychiatric Evaluation. 79. Janice Longer, esq., filed a Post Trial
Motion for Acquittal of the conviction. 80. After a meeting with a
Psychologist and a Psychiatrist both refused to give CATERBONE a psychiatric
evaluation for the County of Lancaster for fear of being sued in civil
courts. 81. On October 24, 2007, CATERBONE was sentenced to 6 months
probation, fined $500.00, and a mandatory 2 years Drivers License Suspension by
PENNDOT. CATERBONE performed the 6 months probation, the other sentencing
items were not imposed due to the pending appeal. A Post Sentence Motion was
filed. 82. After Judge Cullen and President Judge Farina ORDERED Court
Appointed Attorney Paul B. Campbell, Esq., take over the Appeal of the case for
Janice Longer, Esq. 83. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge
failed to file an Opinion and Memorandum for the Post Sentence Motion and let the
120 days lapse. 84. Court Appointed Attorney filed statement of matters for
the wrong Motion and failed to include any issues for the appeal of the lower trial
court conviction on the Statement of Matters for the Pennsylvania Superior Court
appeal filed in January of 2008. 85. On March 31, 2008 Court Appointed
Attorney Paul B. Campbell, Esq., communicated via email to CATERBONE that
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge James P. Cullen removed him from
the case, without any further explanation. 86. The Fleeing and Eluding
Appeal before the Pennsylvania Superior Court is now without any counsel and is
completely sabotaged by all parties in an effort to avoid a reversal of the lower
court conviction. 87. On May 20, 2008 CATERBONE was illegally pulled over
and detained by Pennsylvania State Trooper Andrew Manning of Troop J at a Turkey
Hill Market on Lincoln Highway East, Lancaster, PA. Trooper Manning and another
Unidentified Pennsylvania State Trooper confiscated CATERBONEs Pennsylvania
Drivers License and a draft copy of civil complaint case no. CI-08-08635.
CATERBONE personally showed Trooper Manning that the correspondence clearly
states the following: The Court has informed PennDOT that you (CATERBONE) have
been accepted into the Accelerative Rehabilitative Disposition (ARD) Program for
violating A3802A2 of the Vehicle Code on August 24, 2008. Since this the only
driving under the influence offense on your Pennsylvania driver record during the
past ten years, no suspension is being imposed at this time(There is NO Criminal
Charge for DUI for Caterbone) 88. Trooper Andrew Manning and the other
Pennsylvania State Trooper returned the Pennsylvania Drivers License to
CATERBONE and told him he was free to go. 89. On May 27, 2008
CATERBONE received Citation No. Q0256446-1 in the mails from MDJ Commins, of
15, Geist Road, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, East Lampeter Township, with a charge of
75 1543 B1 Driving with a Revoked Drivers License pursuant to Sec 3731/1574
B1 DUI Related. 90. Trooper Andrew Manning failed to revoke CATERBONEs
Drivers License at the time of the detention, or notify CATERBONE that his
Pennsylvania Drivers License was legally suspended. 91. On May 28,
2008 CATERBONE paid $50.00 in cash to the office of MDJ Commins for collateral
and pleaded not guilty. 92. On May 28, 2008 while at the Office of MDJ
Commins an East Lampeter Township Police Officer again tried to cite CATERBONE
with 75 1543 B1 Driving with a Revoked Drivers License pursuant to Sec
3731/1574 B1 DUI Related. CATERBONE showed the East Lampeter Police Officer
the correspondence from PENNDOT that states the following: The Court has
informed PennDOT that you (CATERBONE) have been accepted into the Accelerative
Rehabilitative Disposition (ARD) Program for violating A3802A2 of the Vehicle Code
on August 24, 2008. Since this the only driving under the influence offense on your
Pennsylvania driver record during the past ten years, no suspension is being
imposed at this time. 93. The East Lampeter Police Officer did not
cite CATERBONE for any violations and concurred that he could not do so, and if he
did, he would have to physically revoke the Pennsylvania Drivers License, unlike
Trooper Andrew Manning of the Pennsylvania State Police.<BR
May 28, 2008 CATERBONE went and applied to the Lancaster County Bail
Administration Office for a Public Defender and was granted eligibility for a public
defender because if found guilty the sentence carries a mandatory 90 days in prison
and a fine of $500.00. 95. On or about May 10, 2008 CATERBONE
received a NOTICE from PENNDOT (only) regarding a DUI charge on August 24, 2008
in Clearfield County. The NOTICE is the only paperwork for that case. There are no
criminal charges filed in Clearfield County, so there is no mistaken identity issues.
CATERBONE addressed the problem as that of either PENNDOT maliciously creating
a fraudulent document or that of a computer hacker creating a fraudulent document
using PENNDOTS system or NOTICE templates. CATERBONE has filed a criminal
complaint against PENNDOT for not correcting the record and the PENNDOT
computer system. The civil complaint is being filed along with this civil
complaint. CAUSES OF ACTION BY DEFENDANTS County of Lancaster Lancaster
County District Attorney Office Deborah Muzereus, Assistant District Attorney
Verdana">Lancaster County Prison Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Verdana">Bail Supervision of Lancaster County and Janice Longer, Court
Appointed Attorney Paul B. Campbell, Court Appointed Attorney
Verdana">Judicial Review Board and Joseph A. Massa, Jr., Esquire, Chief
Counsel Southern Regional Police Department and John R.
Michener Robert M. Fedor Robert C. Buser John A. Fiorill, Chief of
Police Adam Cramer Robert Paul Burger East Lampeter Police
Department and Ronald S. Bezzerd Millersville Boro Police
Department and Michael K. Schaeffer Lancaster City Bureau Of Police
and Robert Whiteford David K. Hershiser Mark D.
Heiser Pennsylvania State Police and Andrew J. Manning Magisterial
District Judge Eckert Magisterial District Judge Commins Fraud; Abuse of Process; Libel; Civil Conspiracy;
Barratry; Malicious Prosecution; False Arrests; False Imprisonment; Vexatious
litigation; Gross Negligence; Gross Abuse of Power and Discretion; Harasment;
Obstruction of Justice; Civil Rights Violations; RICO Violations; Anit-Trust Violations;
Theft of Property; Unjust Enrichment Damages Loss of reputation and credit;
humiliation; and mental suffering. discomfort; injury to health; loss of time;
deprivation of society with family, and loss of liberty. Also: economic loss due to
business and litigation interruption; legal fees and punitive damages. Plaintiffs
seeks jury trial and damages in excess of $100,000. JURISDICTION Barratry, in criminal and civil law, is the act or
practice of bringing repeated legal actions solely to harass. Usually, the actions
brought lack merit. This action has been declared a crime in some jurisdictions. For
example, in the U.S. states of California, Pennsylvania, and Virginia, barratry is a
misdemeanor. [1] In England and Wales the offence was abolished in
proceedings. Criminal prosecuting attorneys, as well as judges, are normally
protected, by doctrines of prosecutorial immunity and judicial immunity, from tort
liability for malicious prosecution. The mere filing of a
complaint cannot constitute an abuse of process. The parties who have abused or
proper basis for an abuse of process action. Abuse of process is a common law
intentional tort. It is to be distinguished from malicious prosecution, another type of
tort that involves misuse of the public right of access to the courts. <BR
elements of a valid cause of action for abuse of process in most common law
jurisdictions are as follows: it is the malicious and deliberate misuse or perversion of
regularly issued court process (civil or criminal) not justified by the underlying legal
action. "Process" in this context is used in the same sense as in "service of process,"
where "process" refers to an official summons or other notice issued from a court.
The person who abuses process is interested only in accomplishing some improper
purpose that is collateral to the proper object of the process and that offends
justice, such as an unjustified arrest or an unfounded criminal prosecution.
Subpoenas to testify, attachments of property, executions on property,
garnishments, and other provisional remedies are among the types of "process"
considered to be capable of abuse. Vexatious litigation is
legal action which is brought, regardless of its merits, solely to harass or subdue an
adversary. It may take the form of a primary frivolous lawsuit or may be the
repetitive, burdensome, and unwarranted filing of meritless motions in a matter
which is otherwise a meritorious cause of action. Filing vexatious litigation is
considered an abuse of the judicial process and may bring down sanctions on the
offender. A single action, even a frivolous one, is not enough to raise a litigant to
the level of being declared vexatious. Roy L. Pearson, Jr., an Administrative Law
Judge in the District of Columbia, who sued a dry-cleaner for $54 million for
allegedly losing a pair of his trousers, is sometimes claimed to be a vexatious
litigant; however, he does not have a history of frivolous action like the parties
normally considered vexatious.[citation needed In criminal law, fraud is the crime or offense of deliberately
deceiving another in order to damage them usually, to obtain property or services
unjustly. [1] Fraud can be accomplished through the aid of forged
objects. In the criminal law of common law jurisdictions it may be called "theft by
deception," "larceny by trick," "larceny by fraud and deception" or something
similar. Fraud can be committed through many methods, including mail, wire,
phone, and the internet (computer crime and internet fraud). Fraud, in
addition to being a criminal act, is also a type of civil law violation known as a tort.
A tort is a civil wrong for which the law provides a remedy. A civil fraud typically
involves the act of intentionally making a false representation of a material fact,
with the intent to deceive, which is reasonably relied upon by another person to that
person's detriment. A "false representation" can take many forms, such
as: A false statement of fact, known to be false at the time it was made;
Verdana"> A statement of fact with no reasonable basis to make that statement;
Verdana"> A promise of future performance made with an intent, at the time the
promise was made, not to perform as promised; A statement of opinion based on
a false statement of fact; A statement of opinion that the maker knows to be
false; or An expression of opinion that is false, made by one claiming or implying
to have special knowledge of the subject matter of the opinion. "Special knowledge"
in this case means knowledge or information superior to that possessed by the
other party, and to which the other party did not have equal access. In
law, defamation (also called vilification, slander, and libel) is the communication of a
statement that makes a false claim, expressively stated or implied to be factual,
that may harm the reputation of an individual, business, product, group,
government or nation. Slander refers to spoken comments, while libel refers to any
other form of communication such as written words or images. Most jurisdictions
allow legal actions, civil and/or criminal, to deter various kinds of defamation and
retaliate against groundless criticism. Related to defamation is public disclosure of
private facts arises where one person reveals information which is not of public
concern, and the release of which would offend a reasonable person.[1] "Unlike libel
or slander, truth is not a defense for invasion of privacy."[2] False light
laws are "intended primarily to protect the plaintiff's mental or emotional well-
being."[3] If a publication of information is false, then a tort of defamation might
have occurred. If that communication is not technically false but is still misleading
then a tort of false light might have occurred.[3] Truth In many legal systems, adverse public statements
about legal citizens presented as fact must be proven false to be defamatory or
slanderous/libel. Proving adverse, public character statements to be true is often the
best defense against a prosecution for libel and/or defamation. Statements of
opinion that cannot be proven true or false will likely need to apply some other kind
of defense. The use of the defense of justification has dangers, however; if the
Defendant libels the plaintiff and then runs the defense of truth and fails, he may be
said to have aggravated the harm. Another important aspect of
defamation is the difference between fact and opinion. Statements made as "facts"
are frequently actionable defamation. Statements of opinion or pure opinion are not
actionable. In order to win damages in a libel case, the plaintiff must first show that
the statements were "statements of fact or mixed statements of opinion and fact"
and second that these statements were false. Conversely, a typical defense to
defamation is that the statements are opinion. One of the major tests to distinguish
whether a statement is fact or opinion is whether the statement can be proved true
or false in a court of law. If the statement can be proved true or false, then, on that
basis, the case will be heard by a jury to determine whether it is true or false. If the
statement cannot be proved true or false, the court may dismiss the libel case
without it ever going to a jury to find facts in the case. In some systems,
however, notably the Philippines, truth alone is not a defense.[7] Some U.S. statutes
preserve historical common law exceptions to the defense of truth to libel actions.
These exceptions were for statements "tending to blacken the memory of one who
is dead" or "expose the natural defects of one who is alive." [8] It is
also necessary in these cases to show that there is a well-founded public interest in
the specific information being widely known, and this may be the case even for
public figures. Public interest is generally not "that which the public is interested in,"
but rather that which is in the interest of the public.[9] [10] See also:
Substantial truth Privilege and
malice Privilege provides a complete bar and answer to a defamation suit,
though conditions may have to be met before this protection is
granted. There are two types of privilege in the common law tradition: <BR
"Absolute privilege" has the effect that a statement cannot be sued on as
defamatory, even if it were made maliciously; a typical example is evidence given in
court (although this may give rise to different claims, such as an action for malicious
prosecution or perjury) or statements made in a session of the legislature (known as
'Parliamentary privilege' in Commonwealth countries). "Qualified
privilege" may be available to the journalist as a defense in circumstances where it
is considered important that the facts be known in the public interest; an example
would be public meetings, local government documents, and information relating to
public bodies such as the police and fire departments. Qualified privilege has the
same effect as absolute privilege, but does not protect statements that can be
proven to have been made with malicious intent. Other defenses Defenses to claims of defamation include: Truth is an
absolute defense in the United States as well as in the common law jurisdictions of
Canada. In some other countries it is also necessary to show a benefit to the public
good in having the information brought to light. Statements made in a
good faith and reasonable belief that they were true are generally treated the same
as true statements; however, the court may inquire into the reasonableness of the
belief. The degree of care expected will vary with the nature of Defense: an ordinary
person might safely rely on a single newspaper report, while the newspaper would
be expected to carefully check multiple sources. Privilege is a defense
when witness testimony, attorneys' arguments, and judges' decisions, rulings, and
statements made in court, or statements by legislators on the floor of the
legislature, or statements made by a person to their spouse, are the cause for the
claim. These statements are said to be privileged and cannot be cause for a
defamation claim. Opinion is a defense recognized in nearly every
jurisdiction. If the allegedly defamatory assertion is an expression of opinion rather
than a statement of fact, defamation claims usually cannot be brought because
opinions are inherently not falsifiable. However, some jurisdictions decline to
recognize any legal distinction between fact and opinion. The United States
Supreme Court, in particular, has ruled that the First Amendment does not require
recognition of an opinion privilege. Fair comment on a
matter of public interest, statements made with an honest belief in their truth on a
matter of public interest (official acts) are defenses to a defamation claim, even if
such arguments are logically unsound; if a reasonable person could honestly
entertain such an opinion, the statement is protected. Consent is an
uncommon defense and makes the claim that the claimant consented to the
dissemination of the statement. Innocent dissemination
is a defense available when a defendant had no actual knowledge of the defamatory
statement or no reason to believe the statement was defamatory. The defense can
be defeated if the lack of knowledge was due to negligence. Thus, a delivery service
cannot be held liable for delivering a sealed defamatory letter. <BR
Claimant is incapable of further defamatione.g., the claimant's position in the
community is so poor that defamation could not do further damage to the plaintiff.
Such a claimant could be said to be "libel-proof," since in most jurisdictions, actual
damage is an essential element for a libel claim. In addition to the above, the
Defendant may claim that the allegedly defamatory statement is not actually
capable of being defamatoryan insulting statement that does not actually harm
someone's reputation is prima facie not libelous. Special rules apply in the
case of statements made in the press concerning public figures. A series of court
rulings led by New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964) established that
for a public official (or other legitimate public figure) to win a libel case, the
statement must have been published knowing it to be false or with reckless
disregard to its truth, (also known as actual malice). Under United States law,
libel generally requires five key elements. The plaintiff must prove that the
information was published, the plaintiff was directly or indirectly identified, the
remarks were defamatory towards the plaintiff's reputation, the published
information is false, and that Defendant is at fault. The Associated Press
estimates that 95% of libel cases involving news stories do not arise from high-
profile news stories, but "run of the mill" local stories like news coverage of local
criminal investigations or trials, or business profiles. Media liability insurance is
available to newspapers to cover potential damage awards from libel
lawsuits. Defamation and freedom of
speech Defamation laws may come into tension with freedom of speech, leading
to censorship or chilling effects where publishers fear lawsuits, or loss of reputation
where individuals have no effective protection against reckless or unfounded
allegations. Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights permits
restrictions on freedom of speech which are necessary for the protection of the
reputation or the rights of others[11]. Jurisdictions resolve this
tension in different ways, in particular in determining where the burden of proof lies
when unfounded allegations are made. The power of the internet to disseminate
comment, which may include malicious comment, has brought a new focus to the
issue. [12] There is a broader consensus against laws which criminalize
defamation. Human rights organizations, and other organizations such as the
Council of Europe and Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, have
campaigned against strict defamation laws which criminalize defamation.[13][14]
The European Court of Human Rights has placed restrictions on criminal libel laws
because of the freedom of expression provisions of the European Convention on
Human Rights. One notable case was Lingens v. Austria (1986). United States Main article: United States
defamation law The origins of US defamation law pre-date the
American Revolution; one famous 1734 case involving John Peter Zenger
established some precedent that the truth should be an absolute defense against
libel charges. (Previous English defamation law had not provided this guarantee.)
Though the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was designed to protect
freedom of the press, for most of the history of the United States, the Supreme
Court neglected to use it to rule on libel cases. This left libel laws, based upon the
traditional common law of defamation inherited from the English legal system,
mixed across the states. The 1964 case New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, however,
dramatically changed the nature of libel law in the United States by establishing
that public officials could win a suit for libel only if they could demonstrate
publishers' "knowledge that the information was false" or that it was published "with
reckless disregard of whether it was false or not". Later Supreme Court cases
dismissed the claim for libel and forbade libel claims for statements that are so
ridiculous to be clearly not true, or are involving opinionated subjects such as one's
physical state of being. Recent cases have addressed defamation law and the
internet. Defamation law in the United States is much less plaintiff-friendly
than its counterparts in European and the Commonwealth countries, due to the
enforcement of the First Amendment. In the United States, a comprehensive
discussion of what is and is not libel or slander is difficult, because the definition
differs between different states, and under federal law. Some states codify what
constitutes slander and libel together into the same set of laws. Criminal libel is rare
or nonexistent, depending on the state. Defenses to libel that can result in dismissal
before trial include the statement being one of opinion rather than fact or being
"fair comment and criticism". Truth is always a defense. Most states recognize that
some categories of statements are considered to be defamatory per se, such that
people making a defamation claim for these statements do not need to prove that
the statement was defamatory. An action for damages
brought by one against whom a civil suit or criminal proceeding has been
unsuccessfully commenced without probable cause and for a purpose other than
that of bringing the alleged offender to justice. Malicious Prosecution and
Vexatious Litigation An action for malicious prosecution is the remedy for
baseless and malicious litigation. It is not limited to criminal prosecutions, but may
be brought in response to any baseless and malicious litigation or prosecution,
whether criminal or civil. The criminal defendant or civil respondent in a baseless
and malicious case may later file this claim in civil court against the parties who
took an active role in initiating or encouraging the original case. the Defendant in
the initial case becomes the plaintiff in the malicious prosecution suit, and the
plaintiff or prosecutor in the original case becomes CATERBONE. In most states the
claim must be filed within a year after the end of the original case. A
claim of malicious prosecution is atort action. A tort action is filed in civil court to
recover money damages for certain harm suffered. The plaintiff in a malicious
prosecution suit seeks to win money from the respondent as recompense for the
various costs associated with having to defend against the baseless and vexatious
misused. Elements of Proof To win a suit for malicious prosecution, the plaintiff
must prove four elements: (1) that the original case was terminated in favor of the
plaintiff, (2) that the Defendant played an active role in the original case, (3) that
Defendant did not have probable cause or reasonable grounds to support the
original case, and (4) that the Defendant initiated or continued the initial case with
an improper purpose. Each of these elements presents a challenge to the
plaintiff. The Original Case Was Terminated in Favor of
the Plaintiff The original case must end before the Defendant or respondent in
that case may file a malicious prosecution suit. This requirement is relatively easy to
prove. The original case qualifies as a prosecution if the Defendant or respondent
had to appear in court. The original case need not have gone to trial: it is enough
that the Defendant or respondent was forced to answer to a complaint in court. If
the original case is being appealed, it is not considered terminated, and the
Defendant or respondent must wait to file a malicious prosecution suit. To proceed
with a malicious prosecution claim, the plaintiff must show that the original case
was concluded in her or his favor. Generally, if the original case was a criminal
plaintiff). If recovery by the plaintiff in a civil action was later reversed on
appeal, this does not mean that the action was terminated in favor of the
respondent. However, if the plaintiff in the original case won by submitting
fabricated evidence or by other fraudulent activity, a reversal on such grounds may
be deemed a termination in favor of the respondent. A settlement between the
plaintiff and the respondent in a civil suit is not a termination in favor of the
respondent. Likewise, courts do not consider a plea bargain in a criminal case to be
a termination in favor of the Defendant. Defendant Played an Active Role in the Original Case In a
malicious prosecution suit, the plaintiff must prove that CATERBONE played an
active role in procuring or continuing the original case. The plaintiff must prove that
CATERBONE did more than simply participate in the original case. False testimony
alone, for example, does not constitute malicious prosecution. Moreover, witnesses
are immune from suit for defamation, even if they lie on the witness stand. This is
because the concept of a fair and free trial requires that witnesses testify without
fear of having to defend a defamation suit owing to their testimony. An
action for malicious prosecution focuses on the abuse of legal process, not on
defamatory, untruthful statements. If a person helps another person launch a
baseless case or takes action to direct or aid such a case, the first person may be
held liable for malicious prosecution. CATERBONE must have been responsible in
some way for the institution or continuation of the baseless case. This position of
responsibility does not always include criminal prosecutors and civil plaintiffs. For
example, if a prosecutor bringing criminal charges is tricked into prosecuting the
case by an untruthful third party, the deceiving party is the one who may be found
liable for malicious prosecution, not the prosecutor. Defendant Did Not Have Probable Cause to Support the Original
Case The plaintiff must prove that the person who began or continued the
original case did not have probable cause to do so. Generally, this means proving
that the person did not have a reasonable belief in the plaintiff's guilt or liability. In
examining this element, a court will look at several factors, including the reliability
of any sources, the availability of information, the effort required to obtain
information, opportunities given to the accused to offer an explanation, the
accused's reputation, and the necessity in the original case for speedy judicial
Verdana">A failure to fully investigate the facts surrounding a case may be
sufficient to prove a lack of probable cause. The termination of the original case in
favor of the original defendant (now the plaintiff) may help to prove a lack of
probable cause, but it may not be decisive on the issue. The plaintiff should present
enough facts to allow a reasonable person to infer that Defendant acted without a
reasonable belief in the plaintiff's guilt or liability in beginning or continuing the
original case. In a criminal case, an acquittal does not constitute a
lack of probable cause. A criminal defendant stands a better chance of proving lack
of probable cause if the original case was dismissed by prosecutors, a grand jury, or
the court before the case went to trial. The criminal process provides several
safeguards against prosecutions that lack probable cause, so a full criminal trial
tends to show the presence of probable cause. Civil cases do not have the same
safeguards, so a full civil trial does not tend to prove probable cause. The Defendant Initiated or Continued the Original Case with an
Improper Purpose In a malicious prosecution, the plaintiff must prove with specific
facts that the Defendant instituted or continued the original proceeding with an
improper purpose. Sheer ill will constitutes an improper purpose, and it may be
proved with facts that show that the Defendant resented the plaintiff or wanted
somehow to harm the plaintiff. However, the plaintiff does not have to prove that
the Defendant felt personal malice or hostility toward the plaintiff. Rather, the
plaintiff need only show that the Defendant was motivated by something other than
the purpose of bringing the plaintiff to justice. Few defendants admit to
improper purposes, so improper purpose usually must be inferred from facts and
circumstances. If the plaintiff cannot discover any apparent purpose, improper
purpose can be inferred from the lack of probable cause. Hodges v. Gibson Products
Co. Hodges v. Gibson Products Co., 811 P.2d 151 (Utah 1991), contained all
the elements of a malicious prosecution. According to Chad Crosgrove, the manager
of Gibson Discount Center in West Valley, Utah, store money was noticed missing
during the afternoon of September 4, 1981. Both Crosgrove and part-time
bookkeeper Shauna Hodges had access to the money, and both denied taking it. On
September 9 Crosgrove and Gibson officials went to the local police station, where
they lodged an accusation of theft against Hodges. Crosgrove was not accused.
Hodges was arrested, handcuffed, and taken to jail. After a preliminary hearing, she
was released on bail and ordered to return for trial on May 12, 1982. After Hodges
was formally charged, an internal audit at Gibson revealed that Crosgrove had
embezzled approximately $9,000 in cash and goods from the store. The thefts had
occurred over a time period that included September 4, 1981. Gibson still did not
charge Crosgrove with theft. Instead, it allowed him to resign with a promise to
repay the money. The night before Hodges's
t
ial was to begin, and almost two months after Crosgrove's embezzlement was
discovered, management at Gibson notified Hodges's prosecutor of Crosgrove's
activities. The prosecutor immediately dropped the charges against Hodges. Hodges
then filed a suit for malicious prosecution against Gibson and against
Crosgrove. At trial Hodges was able to prove all the elements of malicious
prosecution to the jury's satisfaction: (1) She had been subjected to prosecution for
theft, and the matter had been terminated in her favor. (2) She had sued the correct
parties, because Gibson and Crosgrove were responsible for instituting the original
proceedings against her. (3) She had ample evidence that the original prosecution
was instituted without probable cause, because Gibson failed to investigate
Crosgrove until after she had been arrested, and because the prosecutor dismissed
the charges against her. (4) Finally, there were enough facts for the jury to infer that
both Gibson and Crosgrove had acted with improper motive: Gibson had acted with
an apparent bias against Hodges, and Crosgrove apparently had accused Hodges
for self-preservation. The jury awarded Hodges a total of $88,000 in damages:
$77,000 from Gibson, and $11,000 from Crosgrove. The verdict was upheld on
appeal. If
the plaintiff suffered an economic loss directly related to the original action, the
plaintiff can also recover the amount lost. This includes attorneys' fees and court
costs incurred by the plaintiff in defending the original case. Finally, the
plaintiff may recover punitive damages. Punitive damages are imposed by judges
and juries to punish misconduct by a party. Because an action for malicious
prosecution requires proof of improper intent on the part of CATERBONE, punitive
damages commonly are awarded to malicious prosecution plaintiffs who win
damages awards. Other Considerations Actions for malicious prosecution
must compete against the public interest in allowing parties to pursue cases
unfettered by the specter of a retaliatory case. Very few civil or criminal cases result
in an action for malicious prosecution. This is because it is difficult to prove that
CATERBONE procured or continued the original case without probable cause and
with an improper purpose. Another difficulty for the
plaintiff in an action for malicious prosecution is immunity. Generally, the law
protects witnesses, police officers, judges, prosecutors, and lawyers from suit for
malicious prosecution. Witnesses are given immunity because justice requires that
they testify without fear of reprisals. Law enforcement and judicial officers are given
immunity because they must be free to perform their duties without continually
defending against malicious prosecution cases. There are exceptions. If a
law enforcement or judicial official ventures outside the bounds of official duties to
instigate or continue a malicious prosecution, the official may be vulnerable to a
malicious prosecution suit. For example, a prosecutor who solicits fabricated
testimony to present to a grand jury may be sued for malicious prosecution. The
prosecutor would receive only limited immunity in this instance because the
solicitation of evidence is an administrative function, not a prosecutorial function
(Buckley v. Fitzsimmons, 509 U.S. 259, 113 S. Ct. 2606, 125 L. Ed. 2d 209
[1993]). Private parties may also at times enjoy immunity from actions for
malicious prosecution. For example, a person who complains to a disciplinary
committee about an attorney may be immune. This general rule is followed by
courts to avoid discouraging the reporting of complaints against
attorneys LII / Legal Information
Institute American Legal Ethics Library ABA Model Code of Professional
Responsibility (1983) ETHICAL
CONSIDERATIONS EC (Ethical
Considerations) 7-21 The civil adjudicative process is primarily designed
for the settlement of disputes between parties, while the criminal process is
designed for the protection of society as a whole. Threatening to use, or using, the
criminal process to coerce adjustment of private civil claims or controversies is a
subversion of that process;36 further, the person against whom the criminal process
is so misused may be deterred from asserting his legal rights and thus the
usefulness of the civil process in settling private disputes is impaired. As in all cases
of abuse of judicial process, the improper use of criminal process tends to diminish
public confidence in our legal system. Dragonetti Act Claim The Pennsylvania Legislature enacted a wrongful
use of civil proceedings statute (Dragonetti Act) which punishes both the client and
attorney for bringing a wrongful civil action. 42 Pa. C.S.A. 8351, et seq. The elements of a Dragonetti Act claim
are: 1) that the underlying proceedings were terminated in the plaintiff's
favor; 2) that CATERBONE caused the proceedings to be instituted against the
plaintiff without "probable cause"; and 3) that the proceedings were
instituted for primarily an improper purpose. 1.1:520 Wrongful Use of Civil
Proceedings; Abuse of Process; False Arrest 42 Pa. C.S.A. 8352. A plaintiff can recover the following damages in a
Dragonetti Act claim: 1) harm from
arrest or interference with the use of land or chattels; 2) harm from any
defamatory statement alleged as a basis for the proceeding; 3) expense of
defending the original action, including attorney's fees; 4) any pecuniary loss
resulting from the original proceedings; 5) any emotional distress that is
caused by the wrongful proceeding; and 6) punitive damages Hart v. O'Malley (Super. 1994), aff'd (1996). Under
the Dragonetti Act "probable cause" means that: [the person bringing the claim]
reasonably believes in the existence of facts upon which the claim is based, and
either: 1) Reasonably believes that under
those facts the claim may be valid under the existing or developing
law; 2) Believes to this effect in reliance upon the advice of counsel, sought in
good faith and given after full disclosure of all relevant facts within his knowledge
and information; or 3) Believes as an attorney of record, in good faith
that his procurement, initiation or continuation of a civil cause is not
intended to merely harass or maliciously injure the opposite party. Date: June 6, 2008 Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro
Se Litigant Exhibits - 90 pages of exhibits. </DIV> 
V. PENNDOT 08-02981
<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: center">IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Case
No. 08-cv-02981 </DIV>
<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: center" align=left>STANLEY J. CATERBONE and ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP Plaintiffs v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING and BEVERLY J.
POINTS ADMINISTRATIVE COUNSEL-IN-
CHARGE VEHICLE AND TRAFFIC LAW
DIVISION PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF
CHIEF COUNSEL and
 ERICA C. WEITZEL ADULT PROBATION OFFICER OFFICE OF STANDARD PROBATION ADULT PROBATION & PAROLE SERVICE
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
LANCASTER COUNTY and
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">LANCASTER COUNTY ADULT
PROBATION OFFICE OFFICE OF
STANDARD PROBATION ADULT
PROBATION & PAROLE SERVICE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY Defendants </DIV>
<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify"> ORDER of October 10,
2008 by U.S. District Court Judge Mary A. McLaughlin - (Case will be re-filed upon
resolving problems of obstruction of justice and due process (computer hacking,
thefts, harassments, etc.,)
_____________________________________________________________________
<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify">TO THE HONORABLE, THE JUDGES OF SAID COURT: AND NOW comes
Plaintiff, Stanley J. Caterbone, as pro se, and respectfully avers as follows:
Petitioner, Stanley J. Caterbone, resides at 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA,
registered in Pennsylvania with its principal place of business in Pennsylvania..
Petitioners Pennsylvania Operator's Number is 18195782. Petitioner files a CIVIL
COMPLAINT against the DEFENDANTS named in the above caption on this 6th day of
June 2008 in the Untied States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
This complaint is filed under duress. Date: June 6, 2008 Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se 1250
Fremont Street Lancaster, PA 17603 CIVIL COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, Stanley J. Caterbone
(CATERBONE) files this complaint after countless hours and communications to the
parties to resolve the issue of his Pennsylvania Drivers License status and privileges
and to restore his correct record. Stanley J. Caterbone was detained by two law
enforcement agencies since April 10, 2008 and cited once by the Pennsylvania State
Police for Driving while under Suspension for a DUI related offense. The other
detention was on May 28th, 2008 by the East Lampeter Police
Department. 1. On April 10th, 2008 the
PLAINTIFF (CATERBONE) received two (2) Notices from the Commonwealth Of
Pennsylvania Department Of Transportation Bureau Of Driver Licensing (PENNDOT)
via 1st class U.S.P.S. mail. The fist Notice was an ACCEPTANCE into the Accelerative
Rehabilitative Disposition (ARD) Program in CLEARFLIED CTY, Pennsylvania.
PENNDOT stated that CATERBONE violated A3802A2 of the Vehicle Code or Driving
Under the Influence with a BAC count of greater than .08 but less than 1.0 on
August 24, 2007. The Notice also stated that CATERBONEs Pennsylvania Drivers
Privilege was suspended for a period of five (5) years as mandated by law; because
of the violation being CATERBONEs third major offense within one (1) year. The
NOTICE also demanded that CATERBONE was required to return his Pennsylvania
Drivers License no later than April 14, 2008. See Exhibit A.<BR
the same day, CATERBONE received another NOTICE from PENNDOT stating that
The Court has informed PennDOT that you (CATERBONE) have been accepted into
the Accelerative Rehabilitative Disposition (ARD) Program for violating A3802A2 of
the Vehicle Code on August 24, 2008. Since this the only driving under the influence
offense on your Pennsylvania driver record during the past ten years, no suspension
is being imposed at this time. See Exhibit B. 3. CATERBONE was never
driving in CLEARFIELD COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA on August 24, 2007 or on any other
day, and in fact was not driving under his Pennsylvania Drivers License at all during
that time period, and was never in CLEARFIELD COUNTY
PENNSYLVANIA. 4. CATERBONE, on the same day, April 10th, 2008 then
went and delivered a copy to Mr. Craig Steadman, Lancaster County District
Attorney at his office at the Lancaster County Courthouse. The copy is attached as
EXHIBIT A and B. 5. CATERBONE, on the same day, April 10th, 2008 then
went to see Ms. Erica C. Weitzel (WEITZEL) (then Probation Officer of Record for
Case No. 3179-06) of the Adult Probation Officer, Office Of Standard Probation Adult
Probation & Parole Service Court Of Common Pleas Of Lancaster County.
WEITZEL tried to first convince CATERBONE that his last Probation Meeting was
scheduled for the day before, April 9, 2008 and that he had missed it, which she
was not able to do, then refused to listen to CATERBONEs problem and tried to
refuse to take a copy of the PENNDOT letters. As Exhibit A&B.<BR
CATERBONE on the same day of April 10, 2008, then searched the CLEARFIELD
COUNTY Criminal Records and found no criminal violations for a Stanley J.
Caterbone on any Court Records. There were no DUI charges or Court cases in the
Commonwealth Court of Common Pleas pertaining to a Defendant with the name of
CATERBONE. See Exhibit C. 7. CATERBONE then, on the same day of April
10, 2008, emailed Ms. Beverly J. Points (POINTS), Administrative Counsel-In-Charge
of the Vehicle And Traffic Law Division of the Pennsylvania Department Of
Transportation Office Of Chief Counsel alerting her with the problem and requesting
that she correct the record. CATERBONE and POINTS are litigating Case No. CI-
11822 in the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County, and have had a previous
meeting in her office in Harrisburg regarding other misstatements of violations on
CATERBONEs Pennsylvania Drivers License. The agenda of the meeting, as detailed
in communications, was to review CATERBONEs entire drivers license. See Exhibit
D. 8. On April 11th 2008, CATERBONE had a discussion with Bruce
Campbell of the Office Of Standard Probation Adult Probation & Parole Service,
Court Of Common Pleas Of Lancaster County and Program Director of the ARD
Program of the Impaired Driving Program for the Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas. Mr. Campbell told CATERBONE that there was nothing that he could
do, that he had a problem and would have to appeal the suspension. See Exhibit
D. 9. On April 11th 2008, CATERBONE received an email from POINTS
that stated: Mr. Caterbone your driving record reflects the information you
indicated regarding the DUI/ARD and revocation. If you wish to challenge the
revocation, you will need to file an appeal with the court as directed in the notice.
Alternatively, you may wish to follow up with the clerk of courts in Clearfield County
to see if the matter can be resolved with that office if you are not the proper
individual. As Exhibit E. 10. On April 16, 2008 WEITZEL tried to
persuade CATERBONE to sign a Terms and Conditions document for 3 months of
UNSUPERVISED PROBATION for Case No. 159-2006, which CATERBONE had already
completed the sentence on March 5, 2007. See Exhibit F. 11. On August 31,
2006 the Millersville Police Borough illegally revoked CATERBONES Pennsylvania
Drivers License due to a Fraudulent Notice and Malicious Computer Database by
PENNDOT that had CATERBONES Drivers License listed as
SUSPENDED. 12. PENNDOT illegally and fraudulently kept CATERBONES
drivers license until March of 2007 (7 Months), without a valid or authorized
SUSPENSION. 13. During that time CATERBONE had two (2) Driving Under
Suspension charges DISMISSED at the District Magistrate Level by MDJ Stoltzfus and
MDJ Spounagle because the charges that were listed under the SUSPENSION were
legally under appeal. 14. Pennsylvania House Representative Mike
Sturlas Office had to intervene in March to regain the Pennsylvania Drivers License
and Privileges for CATERBONE. 15. On May 20, 2008 CATERBONE was illegally
pulled over and detained by Pennsylvania State Trooper Andrew Manning of Troop J
at a Turkey Hill Market on Lincoln Highway East, Lancaster, PA. Trooper Manning and
another Unidentified Pennsylvania State Trooper confiscated CATERBONEs
Pennsylvania Drivers License and a draft copy of civil complaint case no. CI-08-
08635. CATERBONE personally showed Trooper Manning that the correspondence
clearly states the following: The Court has informed PennDOT that you
(CATERBONE) have been accepted into the Accelerative Rehabilitative Disposition
(ARD) Program for violating A3802A2 of the Vehicle Code on August 24, 2008. Since
this the only driving under the influence offense on your Pennsylvania driver record
during the past ten years, no suspension is being imposed at this
time 16. Trooper Andrew Manning and the other Pennsylvania State
Trooper returned the Pennsylvania Drivers License to CATERBONE and told him he
was free to go. 17. On May 27, 2008 CATERBONE received Citation No.
Q0256446-1 in the mails from MDJ Commins, of 15, Geist Road, Lancaster,
Pennsylvania, East Lampeter Township, with a charge of 75 1543 B1 Driving
with a Revoked Drivers License pursuant to Sec 3731/1574 B1 DUI
Related. 18. Trooper Andrew Manning failed to revoke CATERBONEs Drivers
License at the time of the detention, or notify CATERBONE that his Pennsylvania
Drivers License was legally suspended. 19. On May 28, 2008
CATERBONE paid $50.00 in cash to the office of MDJ Commins for collateral and
pleaded not guilty. 20. On May 28, 2008 while at the Office of MDJ
Commins an East Lampeter Township Police Officer again tried to cite CATERBONE
with 75 1543 B1 Driving with a Revoked Drivers License pursuant to Sec
3731/1574 B1 DUI Related. CATERBONE showed the East Lampeter Police Officer
the correspondence from PENNDOT that states the following: The Court has
informed PennDOT that you (CATERBONE) have been accepted into the Accelerative
Rehabilitative Disposition (ARD) Program for violating A3802A2 of the Vehicle Code
on August 24, 2008. Since this the only driving under the influence offense on your
Pennsylvania driver record during the past ten years, no suspension is being
imposed at this time. 21. The East Lampeter Police Officer did not
cite CATERBONE for any violations and concurred that he could not do so, and if he
did, he would have to physically revoke the Pennsylvania Drivers License, unlike
Trooper Andrew Manning of the Pennsylvania State Police.<BR
May 28, 2008 CATERBONE went and applied to the Lancaster County Bail
Administration Office for a Public Defender and was granted eligibility for a public
defender because if found guilty the sentence carries a mandatory 90 days in prison
and a fine of $500.00. CAUSES OF ACTION BY DEFENDANTS COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING Fraud; Abuse
of Process, Libel, Civil Conspiracy, Barratry, Malicious Prosecution, Vexatious
litigation BEVERLY J. POINTS ADMINISTRATIVE COUNSEL-IN-CHARGE
Verdana">VEHICLE AND TRAFFIC LAW DIVISION PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL Fraud, Abuse of Process, Libel,
Harassment, Civil Conspiracy, Vexatious litigation ERICA C. WEITZEL ADULT PROBATION OFFICER And OFFICE OF STANDARD PROBATION ADULT PROBATION &
PAROLE SERVICE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY Fraud, Abuse
of Process, Libel, Slander, Harassment, Violation of Civil Rights, Civil
Conspiracy DAMAGES Loss of reputation and credit, humiliation, and mental suffering.
discomfort, injury to health, loss of time, and deprivation of society with family. Also,
economic loss due to business and litigation interruption, legal fees and punitive
damages. Plaintiff seeks jury trial and damages in excess of $100,000. JURISDICTION Barratry, in criminal and civil law,
is the act or practice of bringing repeated legal actions solely to harass. Usually, the
actions brought lack merit. This action has been declared a crime in some
jurisdictions. For example, in the U.S. states of California, Pennsylvania, and Virginia,
barratry is a misdemeanor. [1] In England and Wales the offence was abolished in
proceedings. Criminal prosecuting attorneys, as well as judges,
are normally protected, by doctrines of prosecutorial immunity and judicial
immunity, from tort liability for malicious prosecution. The mere filing of
a complaint cannot constitute an abuse of process. The parties who have abused or
Verdana">Abuse of process is a common law
intentional tort. It is to be distinguished from malicious prosecution, another type of
tort that involves misuse of the public right of access to the courts. <BR
elements of a valid cause of action for abuse of process in most common law
jurisdictions are as follows: it is the malicious and deliberate misuse or perversion of
regularly issued court process (civil or criminal) not justified by the underlying legal
action. "Process" in this context is used in the same sense as in "service of process,"
where "process" refers to an official summons or other notice issued from a court.
The person who abuses process is interested only in accomplishing some improper
purpose that is collateral to the proper object of the process and that offends
justice, such as an unjustified arrest or an unfounded criminal prosecution.
Subpoenas to testify, attachments of property, executions on property,
garnishments, and other provisional remedies are among the types of "process"
considered to be capable of abuse. Vexatious litigation is legal action which is
brought, regardless of its merits, solely to harass or subdue an adversary. It may
take the form of a primary frivolous lawsuit or may be the repetitive, burdensome,
and unwarranted filing of meritless motions in a matter which is otherwise a
meritorious cause of action. Filing vexatious litigation is considered an abuse of the
judicial process and may bring down sanctions on the offender. A single
action, even a frivolous one, is not enough to raise a litigant to the level of being
declared vexatious. Roy L. Pearson, Jr., an Administrative Law Judge in the District of
Columbia, who sued a dry-cleaner for $54 million for allegedly losing a pair of his
trousers, is sometimes claimed to be a vexatious litigant; however, he does not
have a history of frivolous action like the parties normally considered vexatious.
[citation needed In criminal law, fraud is
the crime or offense of deliberately deceiving another in order to damage them
usually, to obtain property or services unjustly. [1] Fraud can be accomplished
through the aid of forged objects. In the criminal law of common law jurisdictions it
may be called "theft by deception," "larceny by trick," "larceny by fraud and
deception" or something similar. Fraud can be committed
through many methods, including mail, wire, phone, and the internet (computer
crime and internet fraud). Fraud, in addition to
being a criminal act, is also a type of civil law violation known as a tort. A tort is a
civil wrong for which the law provides a remedy. A civil fraud typically involves the
act of intentionally making a false representation of a material fact, with the intent
to deceive, which is reasonably relied upon by another person to that person's
detriment. A "false representation" can take many forms, such as: A
false statement of fact, known to be false at the time it was made; A statement
of fact with no reasonable basis to make that statement; A promise
of future performance made with an intent, at the time the promise was made, not
to perform as promised; A statement of opinion based on a false statement
of fact; A statement of opinion that the maker knows to be false; or An
expression of opinion that is false, made by one claiming or implying to have special
knowledge of the subject matter of the opinion. "Special knowledge" in this case
means knowledge or information superior to that possessed by the other party, and
to which the other party did not have equal access. In law, defamation (also
called vilification, slander, and libel) is the communication of a statement that
makes a false claim, expressively stated or implied to be factual, that may harm the
reputation of an individual, business, product, group, government or nation. Slander
refers to spoken comments, while libel refers to any other form of communication
such as written words or images. Most jurisdictions allow legal actions, civil and/or
criminal, to deter various kinds of defamation and retaliate against groundless
criticism. Related to defamation is public disclosure of private facts arises where
one person reveals information which is not of public concern, and the release of
which would offend a reasonable person.[1] "Unlike libel or slander, truth is not a
defense for invasion of privacy."[2] False light laws are
"intended primarily to protect the plaintiff's mental or emotional well-being."[3] If a
publication of information is false, then a tort of defamation might have occurred. If
that communication is not technically false but is still misleading then a tort of false
light might have occurred.[3] Truth In many legal systems, adverse
public statements about legal citizens presented as fact must be proven false to be
defamatory or slanderous/libel. Proving adverse, public character statements to be
true is often the best defense against a prosecution for libel and/or defamation.
Statements of opinion that cannot be proven true or false will likely need to apply
some other kind of defense. The use of the defense of justification has dangers,
however; if the defendant libels the plaintiff and then runs the defense of truth and
fails, he may be said to have aggravated the harm. Another important aspect
of defamation is the difference between fact and opinion. Statements made as
"facts" are frequently actionable defamation. Statements of opinion or pure opinion
are not actionable. In order to win damages in a libel case, the plaintiff must first
show that the statements were "statements of fact or mixed statements of opinion
and fact" and second that these statements were false. Conversely, a typical
defense to defamation is that the statements are opinion. One of the major tests to
distinguish whether a statement is fact or opinion is whether the statement can be
proved true or false in a court of law. If the statement can be proved true or false,
then, on that basis, the case will be heard by a jury to determine whether it is true
or false. If the statement cannot be proved true or false, the court may dismiss the
libel case without it ever going to a jury to find facts in the case. In some
systems, however, notably the Philippines, truth alone is not a defense.[7] Some
U.S. statutes preserve historical common law exceptions to the defense of truth to
libel actions. These exceptions were for statements "tending to blacken the memory
of one who is dead" or "expose the natural defects of one who is alive."
[8] It is also necessary in these cases to show that there is a well-founded
public interest in the specific information being widely known, and this may be the
case even for public figures. Public interest is generally not "that which the public is
interested in," but rather that which is in the interest of the public.[9] [10] Privilege and malice Privilege provides a complete bar
and answer to a defamation suit, though conditions may have to be met before this
protection is granted. There are two types of privilege in the common law
tradition: "Absolute privilege" has the effect that a statement cannot be
sued on as defamatory, even if it were made maliciously; a typical example is
evidence given in court (although this may give rise to different claims, such as an
action for malicious prosecution or perjury) or statements made in a session of the
legislature (known as 'Parliamentary privilege' in Commonwealth countries).
Verdana"> "Qualified privilege" may be available to the journalist as a defense in
circumstances where it is considered important that the facts be known in the public
interest; an example would be public meetings, local government documents, and
information relating to public bodies such as the police and fire departments.
Qualified privilege has the same effect as absolute privilege, but does not protect
statements that can be proven to have been made with malicious intent. Other
defenses Defenses to
claims of defamation include: Truth is an absolute
defense in the United States as well as in the common law jurisdictions of Canada.
In some other countries it is also necessary to show a benefit to the public good in
having the information brought to light. Statements made in a
good faith and reasonable belief that they were true are generally treated the same
as true statements; however, the court may inquire into the reasonableness of the
belief. The degree of care expected will vary with the nature of the defendant: an
ordinary person might safely rely on a single newspaper report, while the
newspaper would be expected to carefully check multiple sources. Privilege is
a defense when witness testimony, attorneys' arguments, and judges' decisions,
rulings, and statements made in court, or statements by legislators on the floor of
the legislature, or statements made by a person to their spouse, are the cause for
the claim. These statements are said to be privileged and cannot be cause for a
defamation claim. Opinion is a defense recognized in nearly every
jurisdiction. If the allegedly defamatory assertion is an expression of opinion rather
than a statement of fact, defamation claims usually cannot be brought because
opinions are inherently not falsifiable. However, some jurisdictions decline to
recognize any legal distinction between fact and opinion. The United States
Supreme Court, in particular, has ruled that the First Amendment does not require
recognition of an opinion privilege. Fair comment on a
matter of public interest, statements made with an honest belief in their truth on a
matter of public interest (official acts) are defenses to a defamation claim, even if
such arguments are logically unsound; if a reasonable person could honestly
entertain such an opinion, the statement is protected. Consent is an
uncommon defense and makes the claim that the claimant consented to the
dissemination of the statement. Innocent dissemination
is a defense available when a defendant had no actual knowledge of the defamatory
statement or no reason to believe the statement was defamatory. The defense can
be defeated if the lack of knowledge was due to negligence. Thus, a delivery service
cannot be held liable for delivering a sealed defamatory letter. <BR
Claimant is incapable of further defamatione.g., the claimant's position in the
community is so poor that defamation could not do further damage to the plaintiff.
Such a claimant could be said to be "libel-proof," since in most jurisdictions, actual
damage is an essential element for a libel claim. In addition to the above, the
defendant may claim that the allegedly defamatory statement is not actually
capable of being defamatoryan insulting statement that does not actually harm
someone's reputation is prima facie not libelous. Special rules apply in the
case of statements made in the press concerning public figures. A series of court
rulings led by New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964) established that
for a public official (or other legitimate public figure) to win a libel case, the
statement must have been published knowing it to be false or with reckless
disregard to its truth, (also known as actual malice). Under United States law,
libel generally requires five key elements. The plaintiff must prove that the
information was published, the plaintiff was directly or indirectly identified, the
remarks were defamatory towards the plaintiff's reputation, the published
information is false, and that the defendant is at fault. The Associated
Press estimates that 95% of libel cases involving news stories do not arise from
high-profile news stories, but "run of the mill" local stories like news coverage of
local criminal investigations or trials, or business profiles. Media liability insurance is
available to newspapers to cover potential damage awards from libel
lawsuits. Defamation and freedom of speech Defamation laws may come into
tension with freedom of speech, leading to censorship or chilling effects where
publishers fear lawsuits, or loss of reputation where individuals have no effective
protection against reckless or unfounded allegations. Article 10 of the European
Convention on Human Rights permits restrictions on freedom of speech which are
necessary for the protection of the reputation or the rights of others[11]. Jurisdictions resolve this tension in different ways, in particular in
determining where the burden of proof lies when unfounded allegations are made.
The power of the internet to disseminate comment, which may include malicious
comment, has brought a new focus to the issue. [12] There is a broader
consensus against laws which criminalize defamation. Human rights organizations,
and other organizations such as the Council of Europe and Organization for Security
and Co-operation in Europe, have campaigned against strict defamation laws which
criminalize defamation.[13][14] The European Court of Human Rights has placed
restrictions on criminal libel laws because of the freedom of expression provisions of
the European Convention on Human Rights. One notable case was Lingens v.
Austria (1986). United States The origins of US defamation law
pre-date the American Revolution; one famous 1734 case involving John Peter
Zenger established some precedent that the truth should be an absolute defense
against libel charges. (Previous English defamation law had not provided this
guarantee.) Though the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was designed to
protect freedom of the press, for most of the history of the United States, the
Supreme Court neglected to use it to rule on libel cases. This left libel laws, based
upon the traditional common law of defamation inherited from the English legal
system, mixed across the states. The 1964 case New York Times Co. v. Sullivan,
however, dramatically changed the nature of libel law in the United States by
establishing that public officials could win a suit for libel only if they could
demonstrate publishers' "knowledge that the information was false" or that it was
published "with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not". Later Supreme
Court cases dismissed the claim for libel and forbade libel claims for statements
that are so ridiculous to be clearly not true, or are involving opinionated subjects
such as one's physical state of being. Recent cases have addressed defamation law
and the internet. Defamation law in the United States is much less
plaintiff-friendly than its counterparts in European and the Commonwealth
countries, due to the enforcement of the First Amendment. In the United States, a
comprehensive discussion of what is and is not libel or slander is difficult, because
the definition differs between different states, and under federal law. Some states
codify what constitutes slander and libel together into the same set of laws.
Criminal libel is rare or nonexistent, depending on the state. Defenses to libel that
can result in dismissal before trial include the statement being one of opinion rather
than fact or being "fair comment and criticism". Truth is always a defense. Most states recognize that some categories of statements are considered
to be defamatory per se, such that people making a defamation claim for these
statements do not need to prove that the statement was defamatory. An action for damages brought by one against
whom a civil suit or criminal proceeding has been unsuccessfully commenced
without probable cause and for a purpose other than that of bringing the alleged
offender to justice. An action for malicious prosecution is the remedy for
baseless and malicious litigation. It is not limited to criminal prosecutions, but may
be brought in response to any baseless and malicious litigation or prosecution,
whether criminal or civil. The criminal defendant or civil respondent in a baseless
and malicious case may later file this claim in civil court against the parties who
took an active role in initiating or encouraging the original case. The defendant in
the initial case becomes the plaintiff in the malicious prosecution suit, and the
plaintiff or prosecutor in the original case becomes the defendant. In most states
the claim must be filed within a year after the end of the original case. A
claim of malicious prosecution is atort action. A tort action is filed in civil court to
recover money damages for certain harm suffered. The plaintiff in a malicious
prosecution suit seeks to win money from the respondent as recompense for the
various costs associated with having to defend against the baseless and vexatious
misused. Elements of Proof To win a suit for malicious
prosecution, the plaintiff must prove four elements: (1) that the original case was
terminated in favor of the plaintiff, (2) that the defendant played an active role in
the original case, (3) that the defendant did not have probable cause or reasonable
grounds to support the original case, and (4) that the defendant initiated or
continued the initial case with an improper purpose. Each of these elements
presents a challenge to the plaintiff. The original case must
end before the defendant or respondent in that case may file a malicious
prosecution suit. This requirement is relatively easy to prove. The original case
qualifies as a prosecution if the defendant or respondent had to appear in court. The
original case need not have gone to trial: it is enough that the defendant or
respondent was forced to answer to a complaint in court. If the original case is being
appealed, it is not considered terminated, and the defendant or respondent must
wait to file a malicious prosecution suit. To proceed with a
malicious prosecution claim, the plaintiff must show that the original case was
concluded in her or his favor. Generally, if the original case was a criminal
plaintiff). If recovery by the plaintiff in a civil action was later reversed on
appeal, this does not mean that the action was terminated in favor of the
respondent. However, if the plaintiff in the original case won by submitting
fabricated evidence or by other fraudulent activity, a reversal on such grounds may
be deemed a termination in favor of the respondent. A settlement between the
plaintiff and the respondent in a civil suit is not a termination in favor of the
respondent. Likewise, courts do not consider a plea bargain in a criminal case to be
a termination in favor of the defendant. In a malicious prosecution
suit, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant played an active role in procuring or
continuing the original case. The plaintiff must prove that the defendant did more
than simply participate in the original case. False testimony alone, for example,
does not constitute malicious prosecution. Moreover, witnesses are immune from
suit for defamation, even if they lie on the witness stand. This is because the
concept of a fair and free trial requires that witnesses testify without fear of having
to defend a defamation suit owing to their testimony. An action for malicious
prosecution focuses on the abuse of legal process, not on defamatory, untruthful
statements. If a person helps another person launch a baseless case or takes action
to direct or aid such a case, the first person may be held liable for malicious
prosecution. The defendant must have been responsible in some way for the
institution or continuation of the baseless case. This position of responsibility does
not always include criminal prosecutors and civil plaintiffs. For example, if a
prosecutor bringing criminal charges is tricked into prosecuting the case by an
untruthful third party, the deceiving party is the one who may be found liable for
malicious prosecution, not the prosecutor. The plaintiff
must prove that the person who began or continued the original case did not have
probable cause to do so. Generally, this means proving that the person did not have
a reasonable belief in the plaintiff's guilt or liability. In examining this element, a
court will look at several factors, including the reliability of any sources, the
availability of information, the effort required to obtain information, opportunities
given to the accused to offer an explanation, the accused's reputation, and the
necessity in the original case for speedy judicial action. A failure to fully
investigate the facts surrounding a case may be sufficient to prove a lack of
probable cause. The termination of the original case in favor of the original
defendant (now the plaintiff) may help to prove a lack of probable cause, but it may
not be decisive on the issue. The plaintiff should present enough facts to allow a
reasonable person to infer that the defendant acted without a reasonable belief in
the plaintiff's guilt or liability in beginning or continuing the original case. In a
criminal case, an acquittal does not constitute a lack of probable cause. A criminal
defendant stands a better chance of proving lack of probable cause if the original
case was dismissed by prosecutors, a grand jury, or the court before the case went
to trial. The criminal process provides several safeguards against prosecutions that
lack probable cause, so a full criminal trial tends to show the presence of probable
cause. Civil cases do not have the same safeguards, so a full civil trial does not tend
to prove probable cause. In a malicious prosecution, the plaintiff must prove with specific facts
that the defendant instituted or continued the original proceeding with an improper
purpose. Sheer ill will constitutes an improper purpose, and it may be proved with
facts that show that the defendant resented the plaintiff or wanted somehow to
harm the plaintiff. However, the plaintiff does not have to prove that the defendant
felt personal malice or hostility toward the plaintiff. Rather, the plaintiff need only
show that the defendant was motivated by something other than the purpose of
bringing the plaintiff to justice. Few defendants admit to
improper purposes, so improper purpose usually must be inferred from facts and
circumstances. If the plaintiff cannot discover any apparent purpose, improper
purpose can be inferred from the lack of probable cause. Hodges v. Gibson Products
Co. Hodges v. Gibson Products Co., 811 P.2d 151 (Utah 1991), contained all
the elements of a malicious prosecution. According to Chad Crosgrove, the manager
of Gibson Discount Center in West Valley, Utah, store money was noticed missing
during the afternoon of September 4, 1981. Both Crosgrove and part-time
bookkeeper Shauna Hodges had access to the money, and both denied taking it. On
September 9 Crosgrove and Gibson officials went to the local police station, where
they lodged an accusation of theft against Hodges. Crosgrove was not accused.
Hodges was arrested, handcuffed, and taken to jail. After a preliminary hearing, she
was released on bail and ordered to return for trial on May 12, 1982. After Hodges
was formally charged, an internal audit at Gibson revealed that Crosgrove had
embezzled approximately $9,000 in cash and goods from the store. The thefts had
occurred over a time period that included September 4, 1981. Gibson still did not
charge Crosgrove with theft. Instead, it allowed him to resign with a promise to
repay the money. The night before Hodges's trial was to begin, and
almost two months after Crosgrove's embezzlement was discovered, management
at Gibson notified Hodges's prosecutor of Crosgrove's activities. The prosecutor
immediately dropped the charges against Hodges. Hodges then filed a suit for
malicious prosecution against Gibson and against Crosgrove. At
trial Hodges was able to prove all the elements of malicious prosecution to the jury's
satisfaction: (1) She had been subjected to prosecution for theft, and the matter had
been terminated in her favor. (2) She had sued the correct parties, because Gibson
and Crosgrove were responsible for instituting the original proceedings against her.
(3) She had ample evidence that the original prosecution was instituted without
probable cause, because Gibson failed to investigate Crosgrove until after she had
been arrested, and because the prosecutor dismissed the charges against her. (4)
Finally, there were enough facts for the jury to infer that both Gibson and Crosgrove
had acted with improper motive: Gibson had acted with an apparent bias against
Hodges, and Crosgrove apparently had accused Hodges for self-preservation. The
jury awarded Hodges a total of $88,000 in damages: $77,000 from Gibson, and
$11,000 from Crosgrove. The verdict was upheld on appeal. If the plaintiff
suffered an economic loss directly related to the original action, the plaintiff can
also recover the amount lost. This includes attorneys' fees and court costs incurred
by the plaintiff in defending the original case. Finally, the plaintiff may
recover punitive damages. Punitive damages are imposed by judges and juries to
punish misconduct by a party. Because an action for malicious prosecution requires
proof of improper intent on the part of the defendant, punitive damages commonly
are awarded to malicious prosecution plaintiffs who win damages awards. Other Considerations Actions for
malicious prosecution must compete against the public interest in allowing parties
to pursue cases unfettered by the specter of a retaliatory case. Very few civil or
criminal cases result in an action for malicious prosecution. This is because it is
difficult to prove that the defendant procured or continued the original case without
probable cause and with an improper purpose. Another difficulty for the plaintiff
in an action for malicious prosecution is immunity. Generally, the law protects
witnesses, police officers, judges, prosecutors, and lawyers from suit for malicious
prosecution. Witnesses are given immunity because justice requires that they testify
without fear of reprisals. Law enforcement and judicial officers are given immunity
because they must be free to perform their duties without continually defending
against malicious prosecution cases. There are exceptions. If a
law enforcement or judicial official ventures outside the bounds of official duties to
instigate or continue a malicious prosecution, the official may be vulnerable to a
malicious prosecution suit. For example, a prosecutor who solicits fabricated
testimony to present to a grand jury may be sued for malicious prosecution. The
prosecutor would receive only limited immunity in this instance because the
solicitation of evidence is an administrative function, not a prosecutorial function
(Buckley v. Fitzsimmons, 509 U.S. 259, 113 S. Ct. 2606, 125 L. Ed. 2d 209
[1993]). Private parties may also at times enjoy immunity from actions for
malicious prosecution. For example, a person who complains to a disciplinary
committee about an attorney may be immune. This general rule is followed by
courts to avoid discouraging the reporting of complaints against
attorneys. Criminal prosecuting attorneys, as well as judges, are normally
protected, by doctrines of prosecutorial immunity and judicial immunity, from tort
liability for malicious prosecution. The mere filing of a
complaint cannot constitute an abuse of process. The parties who have abused or
Verdana">Declining to expand the tort of
malicious prosecution, a unanimous Supreme Court in Sheldon Appel, supra, 47
Cal.3d at page 873, observed: "While the filing of frivolous lawsuits is certainly
improper and cannot in any way be condoned, in our view the better means of
addressing the problem of unjustified litigation is through the adoption of measures
facilitating the speedy resolution of the initial lawsuit and authorizing the imposition
of sanctions for frivolous or delaying conduct within that first action itself, rather
than through an expansion of the opportunities for initiating one or more additional
rounds of malicious prosecution litigation after the first action has been concluded."
(Accord Lossing v. Superior Court (1989) 207 Cal.App.3d 635, 638-640[255 Cal.Rptr.
18]; see also Tellefsen v. Key System Transit Lines, supra, 198 Cal.App.2d at p. 615
[Court of Appeal has remedies for frivolous appeals]; Green v. Uccelli (1989) 207
Cal.App.3d 1112, 1122-1123 [255 Cal.Rptr. 315] English Rule Sixteen states require another
element of malicious prosecution. This element, commonly called the English Rule,
states that, in addition to fulfilling all other malicious prosecution elements, one
must also prove injury other than the normal downside of being sued. This rule is
limited to equitable damages, such as loss of profit, and excludes damages that
cannot be measured by the law (e.g., damage to reputation). Date: June 6, 2008 Stanley J. Caterbone,
Pro Se CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION : BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING Office of
Chief Counsel 1101 South Front Street - 3rd Floor Harrisburg, PA 17104-
Verdana">telephone: 717-787-2830 fax: 717-705-1122 e-mail:
bpoints@state.pa.us BEVERLY J.
POINTS Administrative Counsel-in-Charge Vehicle and Traffic Law
Division Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Office of Chief
Counsel 1101 South Front Street - 3rd Floor Harrisburg, PA 17104-
Verdana">telephone: 717-787-2830 fax: 717-705-1122 e-mail:
bpoints@state.pa.us ERICA C.
WEITZEL Adult Probation Officer Office Of Standard
Probation Adult Probation & Parole Service Court Of Common Pleas Of
Lancaster County 40 E. King Street, 3rd floor Lancaster, PA 17608 Phone: 717-
299-8016 Fax: 717-390-7729 Office Of
Standard Probation Adult Probation & Parole Service Court Of
Common Pleas Of Lancaster County 40 E. King Street, 3rd
floor Lancaster, PA 17608 Phone: 717-299-8016 Fax: 717-390-
7729 </DIV></DIV>
CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT

Verdana">
U.S. Federal Civil Rights Law Under
Section 1983 provides:
HEIGHT: 19.8pt">
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance,
regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia,
subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person
within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or
immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured
in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for
redress.
HEIGHT: 19.8pt"> The
Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, has generated more lawsuits than any
other provision of the U.S. Constitution. Section 1 of the amendment has been the
centerpiece of most of this litigation. It makes "All persons born or naturalized in the
<?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-
com:office:smarttags" /><st1:country-region w:st="on">United
States</st1:country-region>"citizens of the <st1:country-region
w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">United States</st1:place></st1:country-region>
and citizens of the state in which they reside. This section also prohibits state
governments from denying persons within their jurisdiction the
PRIVILEGES OR IMMUNITIES of <st1:country-region
w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">U.S.</st1:place></st1:country-region>
citizenship, and guarantees to every such person DUE
PROCESS and EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE
LAWS. The Supreme Court has ruled that any state law that abridges
<A href="http://law.jrank.org/pages/7023/Freedom-Speech.html">FREEDOM OF SPEECH</A>,
freedom of religion, the right to trial by jury, the <A
href="http://law.jrank.org/pages/9884/Right-Counsel.html">RIGHT TO COUNSEL</A>, the
right against <A href="http://law.jrank.org/pages/10135/Self-
Incrimination.html">SELF-
INCRIMINATION</A>, the right against unreasonable
SEARCHES AND SEIZURES, or the right against
CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENTS will be invalidated
under section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment. This holding is called the <A
href="http://law.jrank.org/pages/7578/Incorporation-Doctrine.html">INCORPORATION
DOCTRINE</A>.<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p>

<HR>


Meeting of
October 14, 2008
normal"> 
normal">Location:
Lancaster County Human Relations Office, 225 West King Street, Lancaster,
PA 17602
normal">Present:
Stan J. Caterbone, Complaintaint
Verdana"> &n
bsp; Leslie Hyson, Executive
Director
Verdana"> &n
bsp; Adrian Garcia, Intake
Officer
normal">Complaint:
Employment Discrimination v. H&R Block for denying Enrollment Form for Tax
Preparation Classes to Prepare Taxes
normal">Incident:
October 6, 2008 at H&R Block Office at Manor Shopping Center, Lancaster,
Pennsylvania
normal">Recorded
Transcript of Meeting With Lancaster Human Relations
Commission
normal">(meeting was
recorded with consent of all parties present)
Verdana">[BEGIN]
[Stan J. Caterbone] Alright, so you are
telling me that I did not submit a written complaint to this office before (2007)?
<o:p></o:p>
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"><o:p> </o:p>
justify">[Adrian Garcia] No, actually what I was
telling you was that you are now visiting me to talk about the H&R Block denial
of your application to teach tax preparation classes (to prepare taxes). Is that why you are here?
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] Correct, but you said
that I did not submit a written complaint before.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Adrian Garcia] I you that it was not in our
jurisdiction.<o:p></o:p>
Verdana"><o:p> </o:p><o:p> </o:p>
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] And you never
submitted that in writing?<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Adrian Garcia] I believe that we tried to
contact you on a couple of occasions.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] By how?
justify">[Leslie Hyson] I know we tried to contact
you by phone and by email.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] I did not have a
phone.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Leslie Hyson] You set up a meeting with
me and you did not show.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] I know and I told you
why. But the complaint was submitted before that. Mam, I submitted everything to him (Adrian
Garcia) before that.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Leslie Hyson] Correct. A formal complaint was not filed. Did you come back in and file a formal
complaint?<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] Did you give me a
complaint (form) when I was here?
Then why didnt he give me a complaint form when I was here?
justify">[Leslie Hyson] Because <st1:City
w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Adrian</st1:place></st1:City> told you we did
not have jurisdiction.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] Then why would I file a
complaint?<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Leslie Hyson] That is what we are telling
you, sir. Number one, Federal
Law permits only ..<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] Dont you have to
provide that in writing?<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Leslie Hyson] No, I
dont.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] Listen, Mam, lets not
continue this discussion, lets get back to H&R Block. You seem to be talking in
circles.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Leslie Hyson] No, youre talking in
circles. Every time things dont
go your way you want to end the conversation.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] Mam, you have nothing
in writing to support what you are telling me. <o:p></o:p>
justify">[Leslie Hyson] We do. It tells you what is covered under our jurisdiction
that is why Mr. Garcia gave you it tells you who is covered under our
jurisdiction. You gave us a CD-
ROM with information but none of that is within ..<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Adrian Garcia] None of that is within our
jurisdiction.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] If I submit something in
writing dont you feel it is ethical for you to submit something back saying why it is
not within your jurisdiction to support your conclusion?<o:p></o:p>
Verdana"><o:p> </o:p>
justify">[Adrian Garcia] We would not be treating
everyone the same if we did that because we dont do that for everyone
else.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] Okay, Ill take this up
with another party. Lets talk
about H&R Block.<o:p></o:p>
Verdana"><o:p> </o:p>
justify">[Adrian Garcia] H&R
Block. You are filing
a complaint fo discrimination and I asked you base upon what? Your first answer to me was to me was because
you were a federal whistle-blower.
Okay, thats one.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] One is I have a federal
law suit against the City (Lancaster), the County (Lancaster), and the (<st1:City
w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Lancaster</st1:place></st1:City>) Police; and I
believe that I am being retaliated against. It could be because Im Italian decent. It could be because of all of the lies and
slanderous rumors about me in this (<st1:City w:st="on"><st1:place
w:st="on">Lancaster</st1:place></st1:City>) county. I have three (3) false imprisonments. Do you know what 30 false arrests are? I was arrested 30 times and the
charges were dismissed. I was
in prison 60 days for nothing 60 days for nothing.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Adrian Garcia] Okay. So you think
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] Let me finish. I was in prison 60 days because
someone lid in the county (Lancaster County Bail Supervision Office) and said I did
not attend a bail supervision meeting an intake meeting. I went to court the second day they took me into
prison. They proved I DID
attend but they changed the bail bond (from unsecured to secured, and I was
released some 60 days later after winning my own appeal of the bail bond decision
by Judge Paul K. Allison)<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Adrian Garcia] So one of your allegations
is because of the record of the contacts you have with police during the occasions,
that is what you believe is denying you an application?<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] I said whistle-
blowing.<o:p></o:p>
[Adrian Garcia] Mr. Caterbone follow
what I am saying. This is a give
and take conversation; we wont both talk at the same time. Let me regurgitate what you are telling me. What you are telling me number one is
the whistle blowers act. If you
read our brochure that one is not covered. So well put that on aside. Your second one is again the county (Lancaster) and several
other agencies and you said it was retaliatory. If you look here (pointing to brochure) this agency does have
a provision for retaliation it is a complaint against this office, not a complaint you
may have with other agencies.
Thats your second allegation.
Your third allegation you begin by saying that it may be because you are of
Italian decent. But you went in
and asked for an application, correct?<o:p></o:p>
FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"><o:p> </o:p>
[Stan J.
Caterbone] Yes.<o:p></o:p>
[Adrian
Garcia] Did other people go in and ask for an application with you?
Caterbone] Was I accompanied by someone?
Garcia] Were other people in there for the same purposes?
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone]
No.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Adrian Garcia] So, another words we have
no one to compare and contrast.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] Yes you do. You have the brochure (H&R
Block Tax Preparation Brochure) that says they have to (provide enrollment
form). That is their policy,
sir.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Adrian Garcia] I understand that. That is not my
question.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] That is their policy, sir.
Do I have any - are you asking
me for a witness?<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Adrian Garcia] Well, everyone that come
into this office because what you are hinting at here is public accommodation, but
the problem with public accommodation is that when you are going into an area you
already..<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] Im not filling out an
application, Im trying to ge an application for enrollment into the tax preparation
class which the policy state they provide for everyone. They even have a discrimination clause in here (H&R
Block Tax Preparation Brochure).
If you would read it, you would see that. Apparently, they are treating me
different.<o:p></o:p>
Garcia] And I am trying to get to why.<o:p></o:p>
Caterbone] I just gave you five (5) reasons.<o:p></o:p>
Garcia] I already eliminated one and Im about to eliminate the second
one.<o:p></o:p>
Caterbone] Well, what would be covered?<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Adrian Garcia] Someone has to live in
<st1:place w:st="on"><st1:PlaceName w:st="on">Lancaster</st1:PlaceName>
<st1:PlaceType w:st="on">County</st1:PlaceType></st1:place>, National
Origin. Why do you think it is
National Origin?<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Leslie Hyson] Sir, Im asking you because
you were there.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] Because Italians have a
history. Do you know how many
Italians<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Leslie Hyson] Im not arguing with
you.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] I know,
Im giving you the answer.
Do you know how many Italians work in this county (Lancaster)? Do you know back in the well, 20s we
were the minority to the Irish and to the Germans. We went through this. Thats why.
Name the first Italian President (of the <st1:country-region
w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">United States</st1:place></st1:country-
region>). <o:p></o:p>
justify">[Leslie Hyson] I dont
know.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] There were none.
Never!<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Adrian Garcia] So, youre saying it could
be because your Italian. Has
she said to you in the denial of the application anything as
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] Yes. First of all she failed to give me an 800 number,
which they have. She gave me
a ticket, a yellow memo pad that said Sheryl and a 569
number.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Adrian Garcia]
Okay.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] I think that is
deception. I
mean..<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Adrian Garcia] Did you call the number?
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone]
justify">[Adrian Garcia] Why didnt you call the
number?<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] Because they were
obligated to give me an application (enrollment form) there. I did not go in
there to apply, I went to get an enrollment form. It says here (H&R Block Tax
Preparation Brochure) To enroll simply contact your local H&R Block Office by
telephone, mail, or in person. I
went in person. They refused to
enroll me.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Adrian Garcia] Any you believe it is
because you are Italian?<o:p></o:p>
Verdana"><o:p> </o:p>
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] Part of it, yes. Yea, Ive
been in this county (Lancaster) for 2 or 3 years submitting applications not one
person would give me an interview.
Im talking about from Turkey Hill to brokerage (financial services) firms.
Did you ever read my resume?<o:p></o:p>
Yes.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] Do you know what my
qualifications are?<o:p></o:p>
Verdana"><o:p> </o:p>
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] Well, maybe you
should refresh your memory and go back to my website. Do you know Im pro se? I represent myself in the
courts.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Adrian Garcia] I remember seeing
it.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] Do you know I just won
(an appeal overturning lower U.S. District Court ORDER to dismiss two (2) civil
actions) in the Third Circuit (U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals)? Do you know I beat Fulton Bank, <st1:place
<st1:PlaceType w:st="on">County</st1:PlaceType></st1:place>
.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Adrian Garcia] I know you have a pretty
extensive list.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] Do you know who I
blew the whistle on?<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Adrian Garcia] I cant remember. I cant remember the
details.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] Listen. I blew the whistle on ISC. I was the one that blew the
whistle. ISC, the <st1:place
<st1:PlaceType w:st="on">County</st1:PlaceType></st1:place>
Corporation. They were selling
arms to <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place
w:st="on">Iraq</st1:place></st1:country-region>. Do you understand that?<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Adrian Garcia] Okay, lets stick to the
matter at hand.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] They were indicted four
(4) years after I blew the whistle on them.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Adrian Garcia] I gave
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] I dont know why
youre sitting there laughing at me!<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Adrian Garcia] I gave you Thats
deceiving. Im not laughing at
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] You were!
justify">[Adrian Garcia] What I want to know is
what did she say that makes you believe that it is because you are of Italian
heritage that she is denying you the application?<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] The fact that she
denied (giving) it.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Adrian Garcia] Did you see anyone else go
in and ask for an application that was Italian?<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] No, I did not see
anyone go in there.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Adrian Garcia] So, in other
words there is no one that I can compare and contrast to? If you came in here and said I went in
and asked for an application and a person came in as I was leaving and asked for an
application and they got it<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] They have to provide
the application, sir.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Adrian Garcia] That is not what it says
here. My job is to enforce what
it says here. My job is to
.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] Your job is to abide by
the statute regarding discrimination and take my
complaint.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Adrian Garcia] Order 64. That is the only thing this office can
deal with. But so far your not
meeting the burden for us to even open up a case.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] I dont understand why I am not meeting the
burden.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Adrian Garcia] Well, youre not giving me
anything that falls <o:p></o:p>
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] Is that your personal
opinion? It is discretionary?
justify">[Adrian Garcia] No, I think you are here
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] Isnt it?
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] I think it is your
discretionary opinion. So if I
find a case that contradicts you, then what are you going to do?
justify">[Adrian Garcia] Say
Congratulations.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Stan J. Caterbone] Ill go do that. I wont waste your time
anymore. Thank you very
much.<o:p></o:p>
justify">[Adrian Garcia] Your welcome. (Turn Digital
Recorder Off and Leave Office)
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New
Roman'; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US;
mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">[THE
END]</DIV>
Verdana">
<HR>
Verdana">August 27, 2007 Adrian
Garcia Intake Officer Lancaster County Human Rights
Commission 225 West King Street P.O. Box 83480 Re: Discrimination
Complaint Dear Mr. Garcia: Enclosed is the documentation to support a
discrimination complaint according to Ordinance #64, and its mandate which states
WHEREAS, the County of Lancaster has fostered the cause of those civil rights
protected by state and federal law by providing for a Lancaster City-County Human
Relations Commission, as set forth in Resolution No. 45 of 1964. I am alleging discrimination according
to: 1. Section 7: Racial or Ethnic
Problems 2. Section 8: Employment Problems 3. Section 11: Unlawful Public
Accommodation Practices 4. Unpopular Political Views 5. Retaliation
for Whistleblowers due to Federal False Claims Act regarding International Signal
& Control, Plc., Most of these activities
cover a period of 20 years, and are continuing today. Please note that a Civil Rights
Complaint was filed in Pennsylvania Civil Rights Section on July 21, 2006, and an
amended Employment Discrimination complaint was filed on February 8, 2007. More
information is available on the website of Advanced Media Group,
http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/. I remain, Stan J.
Verdana">Advanced Media Group Enclosure </DIV>
<HR style="WIDTH: 100%; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; HEIGHT: 2px">
</DIV>
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">February 8, 2007 Nelson Brewster Pennsylvania Attorney Generals Office Civil Rights
Enforcement Section 14th Floor Strawberry Square Harrisburg.
PA 17120 RE: Complaint received in the Civil
Rights Enforcement Section (CRES) on July 21,2006 Dear Mr. Brewster: In addition to
the Complaint that you had received on July 21, 2006, I would like to add the
following Employment related complaints regarding discrimination, and other
causes of actions regarding my Civil Rights 1. Attached are several
applications for employment, my resume, and several communications via email
soliciting employment with potential opportunities for employment. As you can see,
I have applied for employment at a wide variety of companies, including the City of
Lancaster and the County of Lancaster. All of these applications occurred from
approximately October of 2006 and this date. I am alleging that due to the fact that
I would have accepted any position, even that of a clerk at both Turkey Hill and
McDonalds, I have been subject to a vast array of discrimination towards a Whistle
Blower2, and discrimination3 for my political views and beliefs. 1 1983 Civil Rights Acts and 18 U.S.C.A. Acts state
the following: The underlying purpose of the scheme of protecting constitutional
rights are to permit victims of constitutional violations to obtain redress, to provide
for federal prosecution of serious constitutional violations when state criminal
proceedings are ineffective for purpose of deterring violations and to strike a
balance between protection of individual rights from state infringement and
protection from state and local government from federal interference, 18 U.S.C.A.
241, 242; U.S.C.A. Const. Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14, 5, 15, 2: 42 U.S.C.A.
1981-1982, 1985, 1988, Fed. Rules Civil Proc. Rule 28, U.S.C.A. 2 In the case of United States v. Holck, 389 F. Supp.
2d. 338, criminal responsibility defines single or multiple conspiracies by the
following: Governments, without committing variance between single conspiracy
charges in an indictment and its proof at trial may establish existence at continuing
core conspiracy which attracts different members at different times and which
involves different subgroups committing acts in furtherance of an overall plan. This
illustrates the legal analysis of the 1987 conspiracy to cover-up my International
Signal & Control, Plc., whistle blowing activities. 3 1983 Civil Rights Acts and 18 U.S.C.A. Acts state the following: The
underlying purpose of the scheme of protecting constitutional rights are to permit
victims of constitutional violations to obtain redress, to provide for federal
prosecution of serious constitutional violations when state criminal proceedings are
ineffective for purpose of deterring violations and to strike a balance between
protection of individual rights from state infringement and protection from state and
local government from federal interference, 18 U.S.C.A. 241, 242; U.S.C.A.
Const. Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14, 5, 15, 2: 42 U.S.C.A. 1981-1982, 1985, 1988,
Fed. Rules Civil Proc. Rule 28, U.S.C.A. I was denied an application at McDonalds on the Millersville Pike on more
than 4 occasions, and was only allowed to submit an Employment Interest Form.
This all occurred over the last 45 days. I was also denied interviews at all places of
employment. I had submitted resumes to several of the more professional
employers. There is no excuse for this
behavior given the fact that I have never failed at any business endeavor in my life.
My professional accomplishments are truthful and honest and I challenge you or
anyone to find otherwise. I hope to
hear from you in the very near future. I appreciate your help regarding these serious
allegations. Respectfully, Stan J.
Verdana">Advanced Media Group Cc: file enclosure 
</DIV>
Verdana"></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; TEXT-ALIGN:
center">AMENDED COMPLAINT Filed in July of
2006 </DIV>
<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify"> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; TEXT-ALIGN: center">PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL RIGHTS
ENFORCEMENT OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL Tom Corbett, Attorney
General COMPLAINT FORM Civil Rights
Enforcement 15th Floor, Strawberry Square Harrisburg, PA 17120 (717) 787-
0822 Fax: 787-1180 </DIV>
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">2. IF EMPLOYMENT RELATED, WHOM IN
MANAGEMENT HAVE YOU INFORMED OF YOUR COMPLAINT? DAVID
PFLUMM; PFLUMM CONTRACTORS, INC., FEBRUARY OF 1998 WHAT
ACTION WAS TAKEN? NONE 3. DO YOU KNOW OF ANY OTHER INDIVIDUAL (S) WHO HAS BEEN
TREATED THE SAME OR RECEIVED SIMILAR TREATMENT? NO WHAT HAPPENED TO THESE INDIVIDUALS?
 4. DO YOU HAVE ANY WITNESSES
TO VERIFY OR CONFIRM YOUR COMPLAINT? YES 5. DID YOU SUFFER ANY MONETARY LOSS OR LOSS OF BENEFITS? PLEASE
EXPLAIN YES VARIOUS BUSINESS INTERESTS 1. FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT GROUP,LTD., AND ALL RELATED OPPORTUNITIES 1987 a. FMG ADVISORY,LTD. REGISTERED
INVESTMENT ADVISOR b. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GROUP,LTD., STOCK
AND OPTIONS AND FRANCHISING OPPORTUNITIES c.
MORTGAGE BANKING OPERATIONS d.
VENTURE CAPITAL OPPORTUNITIES e.
AVIATION CHARTER BUSINESS AND OPPORTUNITIES 2. POWER
PRODUCTIONS I DIGITAL MOVIE JOINT VENTURE WITH a. POWER STATION STUDIOS b. TONY BONJIOVI 1987 c. FLATBUSH FILMS a.
STOCK VALUE b. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
BUSINESS AND OPPORTUNITIES c. JOINT VENTURE
OPPORTUNITIES WITH i. AMERICAN
HELIX CORPORATION ii. HIGH
INDUSTRIES AND AFFILIATED HIGH COMPANIES iii. AIM INVESTMENTS AND
INVESCO iv. EXCELSIOR PLACE
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL FOR
 
DOWNTOWN LANCASTER AND MEEDER GROUP v. DONNELLY GEO SYSTEMS,
LANCASTER,PA vi. GAMILLION FILM
STUDIOS OF HOLLYWOOD CALIFORNIA vii. INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS
OF HOUSTON TEXAS viii.
PLANNERS SECURITIES GROUP, INC. OF ATLANTA, GA ix. BENNET WILLIAMS REAL
ESTATE OF YORK, PA x. BECKY
AUSTIN OF HOLLYWOOD, CA; MORTGAGE BANKER xi. MARCY SILEN AND
FLATBUSH FILMS OF HOLLYWOOD, CA xii. SKIP LANGLEY AND
EESCOMP OF HARRISBURG, PA xiii.
NETTWERK MUSIC GROUP BEVERLY HILLS, CA 4. PENNSYLVANIA UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BENEFITS
Verdana"> a. NOVEMBER OF 1987 b. APRIL OF 1998 5. PENNSYLVANIA
HOUSING AND FINANCE AGENCY a.
EMERGENCY MORTGAGE FUNDS, NOVEMBER OF 198 b. EMERGENCY MORTGAGE FUNDS ,
FEBRARY OF 2006 6. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF WELFARE
Verdana"> a. FOOD STAMPS AND CASH ASSITANCE; May
Verdana"> b. FOOD STAMPS AND CASH ASSITANCE;
June 2006 7. PROVIDE THE DATE(S) OF
INCIDENT(S): QUESTIONS CONTINUED ON PAGES #70 THE FOLLOWING ARE INCIDENTS AND ACCOUNTS TAKEN FROM OTHER
DOCUMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN PREPARED FOR LEGAL PURPOSES. FOR TIME AND
CONVENIENCE DUE TO THE LIGITATION SCHEDULE OF THE COMPLAINTANT, SOME
OF THE INCIDENTS MAY NOT BE GERMAIN TO THIS COMPLAINT AND SHOULD BE
IGNORED. PLEASE ACCEPT OUR APOLOGIES FOR ANY ERRORS IN EDITING AND
FORMATING. ALL COMMUNICATIONS INCLUDING LETTERS, FACSIMILES AND EMAILS
ARE IN ITALICS. LIST
OF ALLEGED ASSAILANTS AND PERPETRATORS Conestoga Police Department and
Southern Regional Police Department; Chief Fiorill, Sgt. Robert Busser, Officer M.
Fedor, Officer Rob Berger Pflumm Contractors, Inc., and employees,
Millersville, PA Thomas Grassell, Conestoga, PA Wagon Wheel Restaurant,
Conestoga, PA Residents of Conestoga, PA (Mr. and Mrs. Tim Decker, residents
Stone Hill Road) Lancaster County District Attorney, Lancaster, PA Lancaster
County Public Defender Office, Lancaster, PA Mannheim Township Police
Department The Alley Kat Restaurant, Lancaster, PA Yolanda M.
Caterbone, Lancaster, PA Steven P. Caterbone, Miami, Florida Michael T.
Caterbone, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida Phillip W. Caterbone, Austin,
Texas Commonwealth National Bank (Melon Bank), Pittsburg, PA Fulton Bank,
Lancaster, PA Farmers First Bank, Pete Richter, Lancaster, PA Bank of
Lancaster County, Lancaster, PA Sovereign Bank, Millersville,
PA Citizens Bank, Lancaster, PA St. Joseph Hospital, Regional
Medical Center, Lancaster, PA Lancaster General Hospital, Dr. Emily Pressly, Dr.
Bill, Employees and staff, Lancaster, PA Financial Management Group,
Ltd., et al, Lancaster, PA Attilio M. Grossi, Lancaster, PA February 20, 2005 Letter to the Editor After finding
my cat killed and left by my pond: While I was away for a family
emergency, I had someone let my two cats out after being inside for a few days,
which I have always done in the past. I returned after being in South Florida for one
week. Upon driving toward my driveway, my one cat was anxiously awaiting my
arriveal. However, my second cat was not there. This was immediate cause for
concern, since being mother and son, they had always stuck together. After a few
days I knew that my cat was either abducted or was harmed. No way would he be
around and not come home. The other
evening I went over to my suspect neighbors home, whom I know often has been
mischevious toward my property in the past, and asked him if he saw my cat. He
went on to tell me how big my cat is and how he is the "king of the neighborhood". I
found this conversation to be typical bull.... He said "don't worry it will show up
soon!" Last evening I found my dead cat
lying by my pond with a possom chewing on its ear. I examined the body and found
that it's neck had been broken with no other signs of any other
wounds. I called the Humane Shelter and
talked to a Cruelty Officer who said" There is nothing we can do if you did not see
anyone phycically harm the animal" Is this the way it is? You have to prove a crime before they will
investigate? Sounds alittle backwards to me, but then again I ofter forget where I
am at. March 7, 2005 Email to Dan
Berger, formerly of Fiancial Management Group, Ltd., and brother-in-law of
Honorable Lawrence Stengel, United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvanai; Advanced Media Group From:
amgroup01@msn.com Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 3:53 PM To:
danielberger@comcast.net Subject: Conversation OK, Danny, attached is the document that I had promised. As far at the
other issues concerning the Middle East, here it goes. The following is a
communication that was specifically for the "intelligence community". As you
probably are aware, there are some 15 or more agencies that comprise that part of
our government. The following paragraph was never saved as a file, the only way to
authenticate the document would be to perform a forensic autopsy on the hard
drive to which it was written. The document was displayed on my screen for several
days. I had written the communication sometime on or around January 1, 2005. I
apologize for not knowing the exact date, but I never really had any reason to
resurrect it before now. By memory, the following is the communication: "We finally
have an opportunity for real peace in the Middle East, and you continue to play your
childish games with me. Stop collecting a paycheck and go and support our
president and troops. Your efforts would be far better served. THE PEOPLE OF THIS
WORLD DESERVE PEACE AND NOTHING LESS" Remember the timeline of events.
The Presidential Inauguration was on January 20, and the Iraq elections on January
21. I went on to expand upon that communication and told Chris Mathews during a
debate (no evidence thereof) that "It is about people, not governments" hence the
Inaugural speech! There, it is what it is??????? Commins Hearing Phillips Office February 2, 2005 Phillips Office Supply, Lancaster,
PA email; Advanced Media
Group From: amgroup01@msn.com Sent: Thursday, February 10,
2005 5:11 PM To: cmailbox@buyphillips.com Subject: RE: Repair Service Center Just wondering why it takes you 8-10 days to receive whatever it is that
you are waiting for when I can receive anything I want within 2-3 day! Just curious.
I'll take any necessary action that is within my power and rights to provide a fair
and reasonable conclusion to your attempts to humiliate and degrade me. Do you
Understand! ----Original Message Follows---- From: "comments"
<CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">To: "Stan
Caterbone"
<AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.
COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Subject: RE: Repair
Service Center</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:37:14
0500</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BU
YPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Mr. Caterbone - I have researched your issue
and spoke with Mr. Leonard Brown who is the Director of our Technology Service. He
indicated that he talked with you last week and indicated that your issue would be
resolved within 8-10 days. He explained the circumstances and informed me that
you were satisfied with the resolution. Please e-mail comments@buyphillips.com if
this is incorrect and require me to look into this
further.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Thank
you. </AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><CM
AILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>-----Original Message-----
</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>From: Stan Caterbone
[mailto:amgroup01@msn.com]</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLI
PS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Sent: Tuesday, February
08, 2005 7:53
AM</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>To:
comments</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Subject: Repair Service
Center</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>And where is my facsimile machine guys?
Serial Number 372122034, Sharp ux-b700. Let me see if I got this right. I dropped it
off with an authorization from Sharp, the manufacturer, case no. 2214140, and you
still have not repaired that machine? You had the machine how long now??? I would
say about 3 weeks or longer. You know the emotional stress and duress that this
causes me is about enough to constitute a very fruitful legal engagement. And
especially considering that you are conducting your activities with
malice.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Weis Markets July 4
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Fiorill
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>SRPD
Lawsuit</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Senator
Specter</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Lancaster County In Forma Pauperis
Denials</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Pennsylvania Housing Finance Fabricated
Statement</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Los
Cabos</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Hamilton Hearing Frisking,
etc</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Lancaster City Police Littering; fabricated
stop sign arrest;</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Citizens Bank
Extortion</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>July 2, 1987 - In an effort to continue all
efforts and business activities, Stan Caterbone visits the Office Works, owned and
operated by High Industries, to purchase a printer while staying in Stone Harbor.
FMG, Ltd., had an open account, which Stan Caterbone authorized, as an officer of
FMG, Ltd.,. The Office Works demands cash payment and refuses to put the
purchase on
credit.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>July 6, 1987 - In an effort to document the
conspiracy theory, Stan Caterbone requests Tom Caterbone to call Robert Kauffman
to inquire about the status of his affairs, and to tape the conversation. Tom
Caterbone identifies himself as John Green, a client of Stan Caterbone's and Robert
Kauffman states the following: "Stan Caterbone has moved his office to Stone
Harbor, NJ.. he is not taking care of business, and I need to see to it that his clients
are taken care of for the time being.. he has been spending a lot of money, an
airplane, a place at the shore, and he seems to think that he is too important for his
traditional clientele.. There is some history of mental disorders in his family history..
I can't come right out and say that that is what's going on, .. I wish Stan would get
some professional help.. However for the time being, Stan is not taking care of
business, and I need to be concerned for his
clients.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>July 6, 1987 - Stan Caterbone telephones Dr.
Al Schulz, psychiatrist at St. Joseph Hospital, and client of Stan Caterbone's in order
to thwart the allegations of insanity. Dr. Al Shulz had disclosed that several persons,
including Mary Lynn Dipaolo and Jere Sullivan had called him concerning Stan
Caterbone's behavior and activities. From the allegations, Dr. Shulz advised that
Stan Caterbone was suffering from illusions of grandeur, and prescribed Lithium
treatment, and to return to Lancaster for consultation. Stan Caterbone insisted that
the allegations were purely fabricated, and that no one had any legal right to
interfere with his business and or legal affairs, let alone his confidential medical
records.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>July 6, 1987 - Stan Caterbone contacts David
Drubner, of Boston, Ma, a friend of Stan Caterbone's brothers Mike, and an
attorney. During the conversation, David Drubner questions Stan Caterbone about
"taking some medication", and supports the allegations of
insanity.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>July 6, 1987 - In the following days, Stan
Caterbone had made numerous telephone calls to local, state, and federal
authorities, for intervention and help regarding all of the preceding events and
circumstances. The following is a brief description of each: Manheim Township Police
Department, responded "what bank branch repossessed your aircraft"; Pennsylvania
State Senator Gib Armstrong, responded, "I will call the Pa Attorney General's Office
and have them call you; the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Philadelphia-
based field office; U.S. Representative Robert Walker (RPa), a detailed and explicit
conversation with Mrs. Robert Walker, who would only advise Stan Caterbone to put
his situation in writing and submit it to the Congressman in his Washington, D. C.
office. In addition: David Wouls (Executive Vice President of the Lancaster chamber
of Commerce & Industry), Stan Caterbone talked at length, and in detail,
making allegations of misconduct with members of the same; National Association
of securities Dealers (NASD), in Washington, D.C., Stan Caterbone discussed the
securities related violations. And also: the Securities & Exchange Commission
(SEC), also in Washington, D.C., and discussed securities laws violations; the
Pennsylvania Securities Commission, of Harrisburg, Pa, discussed the implications of
Stan Caterbone's illegal lockout, and his legal and formal positions, including
incorporating officer of FMG, Ltd., Stan Caterbone received no support or follow-up
communications concerning all of the above requests, despite his apparent
emotional duress, and extreme
situation.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>July 8, 1987 - A formal notification of the
termination of Stan Caterbone's Registered Representative Securities license with
the Planners Securities Group Inc., of Atlanta, GA is received, with a "cc: Robert
Kauffman".</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>July 8, 1987 - Stan Caterbone's brothers,
Steve, Phil, Mike, and Tom, arrive unexpectedly and uninvited at the residence of
Stan Caterbone's in Stone Harbor, NJ, and refuse to leave until Stan Caterbone
agrees to take Lithium and return to Lancaster to undergo treatment by Dr. Al
Schulz, for mental
illness.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>July 16, 1987 - Stan Caterbone travels to New
York, from Boston, MA, to visit with Bob Walters of Power Station Studios, to discuss
the allegations of Blackmail, and to find out who is involved, including Scott
Robertson and Power Station Studios. Stan Caterbone discusses the illegal
repossession and other related matters, however during the conversation, becomes
suspicious when Bob Walters and Tony Bongiovi disclose that the "Digital" Movie
project is suddenly suspended until a later
time.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>July 17, 1987 - Stan Caterbone travels to
solicited the consulting of Stan Caterbone in order to help reorganize the financing
of the film studio, after earlier arrangements in North Carolina had gone sour. Stan
Caterbone had spent several days visiting and touring the studio. Ted Gamillion
agreed to allow Stan Caterbone to represent the studio in order to secure the
required financing. Ted Gamillion provided Stan Caterbone with substantial amounts
of confidential financial, legal, and tax documents for the project. During the visit,
Marcia Silen had disclosed to Stan Caterbone that Scott Robertson had made
allegations of insanity about him (Stan Caterbone) to persons at Power Station
Studios and at Flatbush
Films.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>July 24, 1987 - Michael M. Hartlett sends a
letter to all creditors of FMG, Ltd., informing them that stated the following: Stan
Caterbone is no longer an officer of the corporation; he was removed from office on
July 1, 1987; he had been purchasing items under FMG, Ltd., and obtaining
corporate discount and rates; and formally notifying
</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><CMAILBOX@BUYPHI
LLIPS.COM style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>them that
Stan Caterbone had never had the right to purchase items through FMG, Ltd., or
make corporate commitments on behalf of FMG, Ltd., or contract or in any way
obligate FMG,
Ltd.,.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>July 30, 1987 - Stan Caterbone had paid $600
to Dr. Levine, a Psychiatrist from North field, New Jersey, for an objective evaluation
of his mental state of mind, in order to prove the fabricated allegations of 'insanity".
Dr. Levine had conducted a 2 hour meeting in his residence in Stone Harbor, NJ, and
required Stan Caterbone complete the Minneapolis Multiphase Personality Inventory
(MMPI). Stan Caterbone completed the test, immediately returned it to Dr. Levine.
After several weeks without any communications from Dr. Levine, Stan Caterbone
had called for the results. Dr. Levine had explained that he had conducted
telephone interviews with members of Stan Caterbone's without notice or consent
to the original request of Stan Caterbone to conduct an objective and confidential
examination. In addition, Dr. Levine prescribed Lithium drug therapy, and disclosed
a diagnosis of Bi-Polar Mood Disorder without providing any reports concerning a
study or evaluation of his behavior or present state of mind. He only used the
explanation of others contacted by
telephone.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>August 6, 1987 - The legal firm of Appel, Yost
& Sorentino, of Lancaster, Pa., send a formal notice to Stan Caterbone,
demanding the return of a facsimile machine leased from the ACM company of
Lancaster, Pa. Attorney Appel advises Stan Caterbone that it is the property of FMG,
Ltd., and should be returned at once or legal action will
follow.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>August 8, 1987 - John M. Wolf, Executive Vice
President of Commonwealth National Bank sends Stan Caterbone a formal letter
advising that the repossession of July 2, 1987 was both lawful and appropriate, and
declines to accept a settlement of $5 million for lender liability
violations.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>August 10, 1987 - Stan Caterbone receives a
facsimile from the Board of Directors of FMG, Ltd., signed by Robert Long
threatening to file criminal charges for "embezzlement (we have checks to prove it),
burglary, employee theft, corporate opportunity and slander against our
firm".</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>August 12, 1987 - Yolanda Caterbone, mother
of Stan Caterbone, Steve, Phil, Mike, and Tom Caterbone, all brothers, arrive
unexpectedly and uninvited to the residence of Stan Caterbone in Stone Harbor.
After several requests for the visitors to leave the premises are denied, several
brothers refuse to let Stan Caterbone leave the premises. Stan Caterbone flees, and
the brothers chase after him. Stan Caterbone runs into a neighbors house to ask to
use the telephone to phone the police. However, after realizing that he is scaring
the occupants, he flees to the Stone Harbor Police Department, a few blocks away,
in an effort to obtain a restraining order and to lawfully have the unwanted persons
vacate his residence and personal property. Officer Steve Conners and Officer Henry
Stanford refuse the request, and hold Stan Caterbone in custody. After some 30
minutes, the officers, accompanied by Steve and Tom Caterbone, place Stan
Caterbone into a Police Cruiser and proceed to the Burdette Tomlin Hospital, in
Stone Harbor. Upon arriving, Stan Caterbone is interrogated and questioned
extensively about a "gun". A hospital staffer then accuses Stan Caterbone of an
attempted suicide (fabricated allegation from a phone call from James Warner of
Lancaster, PA; which is later found in the hospital report) and keeps him in custody
for 4 or more hours. Another hospital staffer performs an extensive mental health
evaluation. Stan Caterbone is given an ultimatum of signing a contract in order to
be released form the hospital, the contract stated: "I Stanley J. Caterbone will not
take my life tonight or at
anytime".</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>August 14, 1987 - The same family members
again arrive unwanted at the residence of Stan Caterbone in Stone Harbor, NJ. After
another confrontation, similar to the incident of two evenings before, Stan
Caterbone fleas to the Avalon Police Department for another attempt to get a
restraining order. However, en route, just a few blocks from the Avalon Police
Station, an Avalon Police cruiser pulls Stan Caterbone over and arrests him for the
following
violations:</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>1. Driving Beyond the speed
limit.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>2. Driving an unregistered vehicle (all
required registration materials were in Lancaster,
PA)</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>3. Containing an empty beer can in his
vehicle (which was at .1 east three days
old)</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>In addition, the Avalon Police Department
repossessed his car and locked it in the Avalon Police Department Compound, which
was his only means of transportation and communication by car phone. They
also accused him of having controlled substances, which were over the counter
muscle relaxers for his back
pain.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>August 24, 1987 - Robert Kauffman sends a
letter to Millard Johnson, Stan Caterbone's client, regarding his previous intentions
of paying the $25,000 demand note of Stan Caterbone to Millard Johnson. Robert
Kauffman had previously promised to pay the debt to Millard Johnson during a
meeting. Robert Kauffman, told Millard Johnson to contact the FMG, LTD., attorney,
Craig Russell in order to file legal claim, and formally disclosed that he would: no
longer handle any discussions concerning Stanley J. Caterbone. In the last
paragraph, Robert Kauffman discloses that "attorney Mr. Patterson, no longer
represents the Caterbone family regarding his pending bankruptcy or guardianship".
Notes: Stan Caterbone never gave any legal jurisdiction or rights to any family
member, has never filed for bankruptcy, was not bankrupt, or even knew of an
attorney named Mr.
Patterson.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>September 3, 1987 - Robert Kauffman calls
detective Larry Sigler or the Manheim Township Police Department to report an
alleged Terroristic threat made two days prior, on September 1, 1987, by Stan
Caterbone between the hours of 9:00 and 1 pm noontime. Detective Larry Sigler
issues a warrant for the arrest of Stan Caterbone with District Justice Murray Horton
that was issued at about the same time as the arrival of Stan Caterbone at Romar
Aviation. At approximately 3:00 pm Mary Lynn Dipaolo picks Stan Caterbone up at
Romar Aviation for a scheduled visit and dinner. After Stan Caterbone becomes
annoyed at Mary Lynn Dipaolo's unjustified allegations, Stan Caterbone borrows her
car to go home to his residence in Conestoga and to go play basketball. At
approximately 7:00 pm, upon leaving the playground, he is approached by Nancy
Arment, FMG, Ltd., secretary, who is elaborated and crying, asking "why are you
doing this?". At approximately 9:00 pm, in an attempt to recover additional stolen
personal and business tiles, Stan Caterbone proceeds to the offices of FMG, Ltd.,
where he is greeted by employee Stacy Waters and allowed to enter the building.
Stan Caterbone insists that Stacy Walters accompany him throughout the building
as he recovers files in the offices of Robert Kauffman, Michael Bartlett, and Robert
Long. In addition retrieving a Back-Up (FMG, Ltd, records and communications) copy
of the computer system which he integrated. Upon leaving, Stan Caterbone
temporarily disconnect the systems which he had integrated and developed for
FMG, Ltd., which fall under intellectual property rights. Stacy Walters assists Stan
Caterbone in loading the tiles in his automobile, and Stan Caterbone kisses Stacy
Walters goodbye, and awaits for her safe return to the building until leaving. Upon
entering his residence later that night, Stan Caterbone is taken into custody by the
Conestoga Police, and requests that the files that he had taken out of the offices of
FMG, Ltd., be taken along to prove his rights to the property, and his position within
the company. Stan Caterbone was then taken to the jurisdiction of Manheim
Township Police, where he is arrested and taken into
custody.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>September 4, 1987 - At approximately 2:00
am, Stan Caterbone is arraigned before District Justice Richard R. Reeser for the
following charges: Terroristic threats; burglary; unlawful restraint; unlawful use of
computers; theft by unlawful taking; robbery; and criminal mischief. Bail is set at
$20,000 and Stan Caterbone is placed in The Lancaster county prison. He was not
permitted to post real estate for
bail.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>September 5, 1987 - The Lancaster New Era
and the Lancaster Intelligencer Journal report the alleged crimes, reporting that
Stan Caterbone is an ax-employee; that FMG, Ltd., sustained $60,000 because of
his actions; and that he threatened 2 female employees. The entire arrests and
reports fail to acknowledge that Stan Caterbone is an individual lessee of the
property, and in accordance with law, still holds all of his offices of PING, Ltd., and is
the founder of the company. The above incident further facilitates the ongoing
conspiracy, and publicly discredits Stan Caterbone in every way, financially,
professionally, and most importantly conveniently supports the continued
allegations of
insanity.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>September 9, 1987 - Stan Caterbone is given
an ultimatum by the Lancaster county prison authorities, Robert Bayer, Yolanda
Caterbone, and Mary Lynn Dipaolo of posting the required bail only if Stan
Caterbone voluntarily admits himself into the Psychiatric Unit of St. Joseph Hospital,
or remain in the Lancaster County prison. Stan Caterbone is released from
Lancaster County prison, and immediately escorted to St. Joseph Hospital and
admitted into the Psychiatric
Unit.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>September 15, 1987 - Stan Caterbone
questions the legality of the ultimatum for posting tail, and upon learning that it is
unlawful, arranges for his discharge - Upon his discharge, the St. Joseph Hospital
administrators learn that FMG, Ltd., had terminated his health insurance, and
demand payment of $3, 064.60 for the six days of hospitalization. Stan Caterbone is
not able to pay, and leaves the hospital and returns to his residence of Conestoga,
PA.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> </CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><BR
receives a call from Howard Eisler, an Investigator for the Pennsylvania Securities
Commission who requests a meeting with Stan Caterbone. A meeting is scheduled
for September 29, and Stan Caterbone arranges for Robert Beyer and Millard
Johnson to attend.
LLIPS.COM style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>September
21, 1987 -ISC and the British Ferranti firm agree in principal to merge, creating what
appeared to be a $1.5 billion defense/electronics conglomerate, after six months of
negotiations.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>September 29, 1987 - Howard Eisler conducts
a meeting at the Residence of Stan Caterbone, with all parties consenting to have
the meeting recorded by Stan Caterbone. Howard Eisler was not able to provide a
believable explanation of what he was investigating or why he had contacted Stan
Caterbone. Stan Caterbone explains all of the circumstances regarding his prior
meeting with ISC/Chem Con executive Larry Resch, and details his allegations of
wrongdoing of James Guerin/ISC/Chem Con6 and the discussions of that meeting on
June 23, 1987, with ISC executive Larry Resch. Stan Caterbone also discloses his ISC
stock holdings, and his relationships with ISC and Chem Con associates. Millard
Johnson testifies to Howard Eisler during the meeting regarding a previous meeting
in August with Robert Kauffman, where Robert Kauffman tried to persuade Millard
Johnson to fabricate a story that a legitimate personal loan of $25,000 to Stan
Caterbone in June of 1987, was instead intended for investment and embezzled by
Stan Caterbone. Robert Kauffman wanted Millard Johnson to support this story to
authorities. Stan Caterbone spent more than 4 hours explaining and detailing all of
his allegations and business activities including how he founded and built Financial
Management Group, Ltd.,; his mortgage banking activities; the illegal repossession
of his aircraft; all of the fabricated arrests; and the chronology of events after the
June 23 meeting with ISC executive Larry Resch. Howard Eisler ended the meeting
and requested copies of documents from Stan
Caterbone.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>October 2, 1987 - District Justice Murray
Horton conducts a preliminary hearing for all criminal charges against Stan
Caterbone. Attorney Robert Beyer refuses to discuss any issues regarding his
individual lease of the FMG, Ltd., offices, or any issues resulting in the illegal
activities of anyone other than Stan Caterbone District Justice Murray Horton orders
Stan Caterbone to defend all of the criminal charges in the next term of criminal
court in Lancaster County. Stan Caterbone ordered to be bound over for the next
term of criminal court of Lancaster
County.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>October 18, 1987 - The Unemployment
Compensation Review Board formally and officially decides against a claim for
benefits by Stan Caterbone and cites misconduct and wrongdoing as the
reasons.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>October 27, 1987 - Lancaster Aviation files a
civil suit with District Justice Murray Horton for alleged unpaid bills of some
$5,000.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>November 9, 1987 - Stan Caterbone visits
with Parent Federal Savings and Loan's president, John Depatto, to discuss him
problems in meeting his current mortgage payments. John Depatto immediately
disclosed to Stan Caterbone that foreclosure proceedings have officially begun, and
that the full loan of approximately $110,000 is immediately due. Stan Caterbone
stands up from the conference table and declares, "You tell Mr. James Guerin he is in
trouble", and abruptly walks out of the
offices.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>November 23, 1987- A Referees Decision by
the unemployment Compensation Review Board upholds a recent decision to deny
Stan Caterbone from collecting any benefits, again citing misconduct and
wrongdoing. Stan Caterbone calls Howard Fisler, of the Pennsylvania Securities
Commission and demands an explanation for not returning to obtain any documents
as promised in the meeting of September 29th. The phone call was
recorded.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>November 25, 1987 - Stan Caterbone
receives a letter from the Pennsylvania Securities Commission, Howard Zisler, citing
a misunderstanding and lack of communication, and now requests that Stan
Caterbone submit a written complaint of all allegations discussed in the meeting of
September 29,
1987.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>November 26, 1987 - Stan Caterbone visits
the Pennsylvania State Police barracks in Lancaster, to file a formal complaint to the
White Collar Crime Division. Stan Caterbone was treated as if he was making the
entire story up, and received no
help.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>December 4, 1987 - Financial Management
Group, Ltd., holds its first annual shareholders meeting, for the year ended June 30,
1987, at the Treadway Resort Inn. In an effort to promote propaganda against Stan
Caterbone, and to support the fabricated allegations of insanity, FMG, Ltd.,
president hired armed security personnel to guard the doorways of the meeting,
insinuating that the meeting was under a threat of violence, and to collaborate his
recent allegations of Terroristic threats, which Stan Caterbone was previously
arrested and awaiting
trial.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>December 17, 1987 - The United States
Postal Inspector acknowledges receipt of formal complaint from Stan Caterbone
regarding executives from FMG, Ltd., illegally changing or address; opening of
confidential personal and business mail; and withholding and possibly destroying
confidential personal and business mail at Stan Caterbone's leased property of 1755
Oregon Pike, Lancaster, PA, also the headquarters of FMG,
Ltd.,.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>January 26, 1988 - The Pennsylvania
Homeowners Emergency Mortgage Assistance Program formally and officially denies
Stan Caterbone of benefits citing the following: " Applicant was terminated from job
FMG, Ltd.,), therefore was not suffering from circumstances beyond his
control".</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>March 12, 1988 - All CRIMINAL charges of
September 3, 1987 by the Manhiem Township Police Department and the Lancaster
County District Attorney Office are dismissed. There was not one guilty plea
or conviction in the County of Lancaster. March 14, 1988 - Stan
Caterbone is served notice by Lancaster Constables regarding Parent Federal
.Guerin' Bank) v. Stan Caterbone Mortgage Foreclosure of his residence at 2323 New
Danville Pike, Conestoga,
PA.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>May 1988 - Stan Caterbone is forced to sell
his residence, and subdues to the undo influence that he was responsible for all
circumstances, and moves to Florida with his brother Mike for a few months and
returns home for the wedding of Pam and Dave Pflumm on September 10,
1988. Stan Caterbone was a member of the wedding
party.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Sep 15, 1988 - Seven Chem-Con executives,
including Christian, are criminally indicted for the firms $15 million defense
contracting fraud.
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>October 23, 1988 -Stan Caterbone, destitute,
without a personal residence, automobile, or any income, and with accumulated
debts of more than $65,000 from all related incidents in the 1987 "Blackmail", sells
his FMG, Ltd., holdings to Robert Kauffman and is given $72,000 in proceeds at
settlement. This by and of itself will be proven to be extortion. Robert Kauffman was
in fear of Stan Caterbone exercising his large voting rights in the upcoming FMG,
Ltd., annual shareholders meeting, which included the election off FMG, Ltd., Board
of Directors. Stan Caterbone had approximately 19% of the outstanding shares of
FMG, Ltd., and had the potential to vote someone of his selection to a Board seat.
Scott Robertson had solicited the deal for both parties, and acted as negotiator for
both.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>July 19, 1989 - Stan Caterbone, Scott
Robertson, and American Helix agree on a one year consulting agreement for
$1,000 per week. American Helix will never fulfill in its entirety, and will be
terminated in the following
April.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>April 1990 - The American Helix Board of
Directors, lead by S. Dale High/High Industries, vote to terminate Scott Robertson of
American Helix, and to discontinue the financing of the CD-ROM business which
Stan Caterbone was directly involved. The joint venture agreement with Network
Technologies, or Washington, D.C., had lost an estimated $450,000 in the past 9
months, and the technologies, which were to be delivering revenues, had proven to
be worthless. Scott Robertson had solicited, negotiated, and administer the deal,
Stan Caterbone had raised serious concerns at to the capabilities of both the
technologies, the business, and Network Technologies, early in the project. High
Industries then conducted several meetings with Stan Caterbone to purchase the
business, however, Stan Caterbone had told the executive in a meeting on Good
Friday, that he was solely responsible for any business that was left, and any there
was no real value. High Industries agreed to pay Stan Caterbone his weekly
consulting tee only until June 30, in hopes of negotiating an agreement to keep
American Helix in the CD-RON business, which was only feasible with Stan
Caterbone, because of his knowledge and expertise in "Digital"
technologies.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>August 2, 1990 - Stan Caterbone discovers
that in July, Fulton Bank embezzled $5,000 from the checking account of Stan
Caterbone due to an error by Fulton Bank's accounting department Fulton Bank
refused to credit the account for more than 60 days, without crediting the lost
interest income.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Dec 12, 1990 - Ferranti reports a near $40
million loss for the first half year, but says it hopes to begin showing a profit before
year-end in March 1991a Stan Caterbone receives a call from James Christian while
in custody in the Loretto State prison. Stan Caterbone asked Jim Christian if he had
authorized or had knowledge about the June 23, 1987 meeting between himself and
ISC executive Larry Reach. James Christian answered the question as
follows: </AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><
CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>"I never knew of such a meeting, authorized
a meeting with Larry and yourself. Larry (Reseb) was the courier for Jim Guerin, that
is how I and Chem Con got set up and used as the scapegoat to divert attention
away from You
LLIPS.COM style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>should talk to
Earnest Schriber of Lancaster Newspapers, you can trust him.. Guerin's attorney
(Tate) called to offer
LLIPS.COM style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>me $1.00 to
settle my $93 million law suit against
Guerin".</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Dec 14, 1990 - At a Christmas party of
Bradley DeForge's, Mike Dipaolo, during a conversation with Stan Caterbone, had
stated that "You (Stan Caterbone) had Guns and Knives in 1987" as the reason for
the mental illness fabrications. NOTES: Stan Caterbone quickly left the party. In
addition, during the same time, other such statements from friends, regarding his
present "mental condition", began to mysteriously resurface only after knowledge of
his activities to take legal recourse for the 1987 incidents, and to pursue his due
access to the law. Stan Caterbone, in order to get work accomplished on the project,
traveled to Captiva Island, and continued his project, the "AMG Legal Systems
Prototype" disc. The "AMO Legal Systems Prototype" project was a CD-ROM system,
designed by Stan Caterbone, that would include all of his relevant information
concerning his alleged ISC Cover-Up, including audio conversations, and authentic
documents, all stored on one optical disc, or a CD-
ROM.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>The disc and system was finally completed on
May
6
1991. </AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>December 20, 1990 -Stan Caterbone
telephones his cousin Ron Roda, from Captiva Island, Florida, to inform him that he
will arrive home in a few days. During the conversation, Ron Roda, disclosed to Stan
Caterbone that both Jim Warner and Jere Sullivan had made telephone call to his
brothers, Phil and Tom, and made allegations of insanity about Stan Caterbone, and
advised the need for
medication.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>December 23, 1990 -Stan Caterbone forwards
a letter to the Department of Defense Mapping Agency regarding his bid for the
$2.5 million CDROM contract (DMA 700-90-0011), then in negotiations. Stan
Caterbone alleges misconduct in the procurement and for the first time publicly
discloses his allegations of Blackmail immediately following his meeting with ISC
executive Larry Resch on June 23,
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>January 9, 1991 - Lt. Madenspacher of the
Manheim Township Police Department call Stan Caterbone at his lab/office in him
home at approximately 2:00 pm. Lt. Madenspacher explains that he had received a
copy of the letter to the Department of Defense, that Detective Larry Mathias had
forwarded to him. Lt. Madenspacher questioned his motives of the letter and stated:
"What are you going to do.. We (Manheim Township Police Department) just don't
want to see a multi-million dollar law suit come down our way.." Stan Caterbone
responded, "You know that I was an individual lessee of that property, and in
addition I had never resigned any offices or my Board of Director's seat of FMG, Ltd.,
.. You also know that I had met with Larry Resch of ISC on June 2S, 1987, and that I
made allegations of misconduct.." Lt. Madenspacher responded, "We were forced
into that (the arrests of Stan Caterbone on Sept. 3, 1987), we were caught between
a rock and a hard place, we were forced into that".
LLIPS.COM style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Lt.
Madenspacher then changed the subject to "Digital" technologies, and described
the activities of the police department of using the same in the telephone
surveillance of criminal suspects. Lt. Madenspacher then requested to meet with
Stan Caterbone. Stan Caterbone agreed, however due to his current busy schedule,
confirmed he would contact him later to schedule a
meeting.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>January 10, 1991 - Stan Caterbone sends a
letter to Lt. Madenspacher of the Manheim Township Police Department, to schedule
a meeting for Thursday, Jan. 17th at 3:00 pm, at his office at American Helix
Technology Corporation, at the Green field Corporate Park. Stan Caterbone
requested a response only if the time was in conflict of his
schedule.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>January 17, 1991 - Lt. Madenspacher fails to
show up for the scheduled meeting with Stan Caterbone at Amen can Helix, and
never contacted him before that date to change the meeting, or called to apologize
for not being able to keep the prior
commitment.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>January 18, 1991 - Stan Caterbone sends
documents concerning the Blackmail" of 1987 to several reporters of the Lancaster
Newspapers,: Tim MeKeele; Earnest Schreiber; and Thomas Planner. Tim MeKeele
also received a tape with some excerpts of the September 29, 1987 meeting with
the PA Securities Commission, where Stan Caterbone discusses allegations of
misconduct against J. Guerin and
ISC.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>January 19, 1991 - High Industries American
Helix illegally and without notice locks Stan Caterbone out of his office and the
facility of American Helix, who was currently under a joint venture agreement with
Stan Caterbone and his Advanced Media Group, Ltd., for his digital technologies
business. NOTES:: This "Lock-Out" was similar to that of FMG, Ltd., on July 1, 1987.
Again conveniently when Stan Caterbone had raised issues and allegations
involving Guerin and
ISC.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>January 21, 1991 - In fear and confused about
his involvement, and in respect to the massive fraud of the ISC/Ferranti merger,
Stan Caterbone sends a package to Ferrantis legal counsel in England by way of
United Postal Service' Overnight International Delivery Service (Tracking Number
1773 0619 670). NOTES: Stan Caterbone was in fear that a potential "Cover-Up" by
U.S. authorities, and specifically the Lancaster community, would place his life in
danger, and wanted to insure that the information concerning his knowledge of ISC
misconduct before the lSC/Ferranti merger, and his disclosure to local, state, and
federal authorities in the summer of 1987, at least would be received by Ferranti,
reducing the possibility of someone terminating his life in order so that these
circumstances would not be used as an asset in the present Ferranti Legal
efforts.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Jan 22, 1991 - In an effort to support his
allegations of misconduct and the allegedly threatening activities of Stan
Caterbone, American Helix president Dave Dering has all of the locks in the building
changed by a professional locksmith, which is nothing more than an act of
propaganda.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>February 1, 1991 - ABC News 20/20 features
the story "Weapons Sales to Iraq" about the ISC/Cardoen cluster bomb technology
and how it got to Saddam Husain. Feb 17, 1991 - Stan Caterbone receives a letter
from Sandra K. Paul, of the Citizens Ambassador Program, a division of People to
People International, notifying him that he has been selected to participate in the
upcoming Printing and Publishing Delegation to the Soviet Union and Eastern
Europe in the coming August. People to People International are a nonprofit
organization started by the late Dwight D. Eisenhower to facilitate the
communications of experts from various professions throughout the world. The
objective of the delegation was to exchange ideas, information, and technologies of
the printing and publishing industries with American counterparts in the Soviet
Union, and various Eastern European
countries.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>February 22, 1991 - Federal prosecutors seize
$800,000 from Clark, claiming he was privy to information about ongoing criminal
acts within ISC that generated the tainted
cash.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>February 1991 -In an American Helix staff
meeting, with all employees present, but Stan Caterbone, president David Dering
had spent approximately 20 minutes alleging that Stan Caterbone almost ruined his
company, and that he "is a runaway ex-convict, that will end up in jail very soon".
The above discussion was disclosed by engineer Al Thornburg, immediately
following the
meeting.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>May 23, 1991 - At approximately 2:00 pm, Jay
Curtis, (appearing as a Department of Defense contractor, who had recently
solicited the services of Stan Caterbone and his Advanced Media Group, Ltd., to
provide engineering in the development of "Digital" simulation and training
applications for various U.S. Military Logistics bases) had called Stan Caterbone. The
following is synopsis of the conversation: "Because of your recent discussions
concerning your knowledge and information about the ISC Scandal, and an alleged
"Cover-Up", I had to do a background check on you, to insure against any problems
when including you in by proposal to the U.S. Department of Defense... Everyone
backs up your story, and is looking over your documents now, including the CIA,
IRS, SEC, FBI, Scotland Yard, Attorney General, the British M-4, and others. They are
all verifying and confirming your "cover-up" allegations.. They don't know what to
tell the Press and Media "I also know that you submitted documents to Mr. Thomas
Flannery of the Lancaster Intelligencer Journal". "How did you know about the CIA
and its involvement with ISC, how did you know that, and what do you know?"
NOTES: Jay Curtis kept pushing Stan Caterbone on the CIA issue, and what he had
known and how he knew, Stan Caterbone kept telling him that the whole situation
was to emotional, and that he was afraid for his life. Stan Caterbone had to
eventually tell Mr. Curtis that he could not discuss this anymore. He abruptly
changed the subject and hung up on Mr. Curtis. Stan Caterbone immediately went
to a friends house, and disclosed that fact that he was in fear for his life. He quitly
sat on the steps with his friend, Abby. Later that night, his friend Dave Pflumm
would take him to the corner bar for a few drinks, while unknowing to Stan
Caterbone, Ted Koppel was disclosing the story of the CIAs involvement with ISC.
Several hours later, Ted Koppel broke the story about the CIA and ISC's covert
operations to sell arms to Iraq. Immediately following the conversation with Mr. Jay
Curtis regarding the CIA and ISC, Stan Caterbone packed a suitcase and confidential
information assets, in preparation to leave Lancaster, in total and legitimate fear for
his life.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>May 23, 1991 - ABC News/Nightline and Ted
Koppel feature the first in a series of stories, relating to CIA knowledge of a covert
operation to supply munitions to south Africa implemented by ISC and Carlos
Cardoen. The story featured Lancaster and ISC. The report ties Guerin to the
National Security Agency project in the 1970s. The report was investigated by ABC
News, the Financial Times of London, and the Lancaster Intelligencer News. Tom
Flannery of the Lancaster Intelligencer Journal, appeared on the program and was
given credits on the
show.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>May 24, 1991 - The Lancaster Intelligencer
Journal reports on the above story. At approximately 1:30 pm, Stan Caterbone drives
out of Lancaster, en route to a safe haven, and stops at a convenience store and
reads the early edition of the Lancaster New Era, learning for the first time of ABC
News/Nightline story about ISC and the CIA the evening before, just hours after his
conversation regarding the same to Jay
Curtis.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>June 7, 1991 - Stan Caterbone is again
arrested by the Stone Harbor Police. After passing several sobriety tests, and two
Breathalyzer tests, Stan Caterbone is placed in a jail cell, and refused to be
released. Several hours later, Stan Caterbone is cited for outstanding arrests
warrants of Avalon, NJ, dated back to August 14, 1987, by an officer of the Avalon
Police department who suddenly appeared. Both arresting officers demanded
$340.00 for the posting of bail. Stan Caterbone requested that the required cash be
retrieved from his car, located just a few blocks away. The Avalon police officer
responded by saying, "we can't let you go to your car, you may have a gun in
there". Stan Caterbone was immediately escorted to the cape May county Prison,
fingerprinted and
processed.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>June 8, 1987 - Stan Caterbone calls Mike
Orstein, Lt. of the Stone Harbor police patrol, and requests that he retrieve the
required cash from his car, and post the required bail. At approximately 2:30 pm,
Stan Caterbone is released on
bail.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>June 11, 1991 - Stan Caterbone left the Stone
Harbor Marina at approximately 12:30 am en route to Lancaster, Pa, to retrieve
some files concerning the ISC cover-up. Upon driving north on Route 47 (the normal
route to Lancaster), approximately 10 miles outside the Cape May county
Courthouse, Stan Caterbone noticed a car following him closely. Suspicious, Stan
Caterbone decreased his speed from 55 mph to 35 mph, in order for the car to pass
him. However, the car remained directly behind, adjusting the speed accordingly. In
an effort to elude the car, without raising suspicion, Stan Caterbone gradually
increased his speed, while also increasing the distance between the cars, resulting
in the loss of his taillights to the ensuing vehicle - Because of the winding road, Stan
Caterbone looked for an abrupt turn-off, in hopes of dashing the eluding vehicle, by
loosing sight of his taillights. There was little or no traffic on the route during the
early morning hours, and Stan Caterbone stopped at an intersection, and noticed
that the headlights of the ensuing vehicle were not visible in his rear view mirror,
meaning that his taillights were also not visible to the ensuing vehicle. Immediately
upon pulling from the intersection, Stan Caterbone noticed a narrow dirt road that
lead into a field of small trees, the perfect place to sit for the ensuing auto to pass
him, unnoticed. The ensuing vehicle pulled to the intersection, and continued north
on route 47, in the direction of Lancaster. Stan Caterbone sat in his vehicle a few
minutes, until continuing on his travel, north on Route 47. Approximately five (5)
minutes later, a car traveling in excess of SS mph, approached Stan Caterbone,
traveling south on the same road (2 lanes) As the two cars approached each other,
and approximately 30 yards from reaching each other, the approaching vehicle
drove directly into the lane of Stan Caterbone, with its high beams on, and
continued straight for his vehicle, or what appeared to be a head-on-collision. Stan
Caterbone drove off of the berm of the road, missing a line of trees by less than 12
inches (eluding a life threatening disaster), and passed the vehicle that was still in
the north bound lane, heading south. Stan Caterbone, shaking and sweating
furiously, noticed the cars brake lights go on, and the car apparently turned around,
and began pursuing Stan Caterbone again. Stan Caterbone drove as fast as he
could to Route 55, hoping to find traffic in order to hide and loose the pursuing car.
Stan Caterbone arrived in Lancaster, at approximately 3:00 am, and again noticed a
car sitting in the parking lot of the vacant "Sportsman's Den", at the intersection of
the New Danville Pike and Prince Streets. Upon driving west on Hershey Avenue,
Stan Caterbone noticed the car following him. In an effort to identify the license
plate, Stan Caterbone made a few turns in the area of Hamilton Watch, and followed
the car heading north on S. West End Avenue. The car was a late model, gold or tan,
Cougar or possibly a Buick Park Avenue. Stan Caterbone watched the car increase
his speed, and finally changed directions and proceeded to his residence, and
parked a few blocks away, and walked through the woods, to his apartment in the
Hershey Heritage complex. Stan Caterbone then used a flashlight, in order not to
reveal his presence, and returned to his vehicle, sometime in the early morning,
during daylight.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>June 19, 1991 - Stan Caterbone leaves Stone
Harbor, in constant fear for his life, and remains in seclusion, in various parts of
Eastern Seacoast, spanning from Captiva Island, Florida, to Boston, MA, in order to
prepare an official request Congressional Investigation of all related
matters. </AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM>
<CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Jul 11, 1991 - Stan Caterbone files an official
request C300 pages) for a Congressional Investigation into all of the ISC and
preceding issues with U. S. Representative Robert Walker CR-Pennsylvania), and
Speaker of the House, U. S. Representative Thomas Foley. Overnight Mail Service of
the United States Post Office, outside of Baltimore, Maryland, sent both
requests.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>July 12, 1991 - Stan Caterbone returns to his
home, in Lancaster, PA, at approximately 12:00 pm, after remaining in seclusion
immediately following the phone conversation of May 23, 1991 with Jay Curtis,
regarding the CIA and ISC. ABC News/Nightline features it's second story about
Lancaster's ISC and Arms to South Africa and
Iraq.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>July 18, 1991 - U.S. Representative Robert
Walker sends a letter to Stan Caterbone relating to his request for a Congressional
Investigation into all of his allegations of misconduct and criminal wrongdoing
regarding his alleged ISC/Fraud "cover-up". The letter said : "Thank you for your
recent letter and information on International Signal & Control corporation. I
appreciate your thinking of me; however, since this case is before the courts, it is
unethical for me to interfere with judicial process. If you think I may be of assistance
with other matters, please feel free to contact
me".</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><BR
notice of a warrant for his arrest by the Stone Harbor (NJ) Municipal Court, regarding
summons #081370. Stan Caterbone called the Court Clerk, Pam Davidson, to
explain the circumstances. The Court Clerk refused to identify herself, and did not
have time to listen to his explanation. She then questioned why he (Stan Caterbone)
wanted to write to the Judge to explain. Stan Caterbone writes a formal letter to
Judge Peter M. Tourison, of the Stone Harbor Municipal Court explaining his
allegations of misconduct, and the issues surrounding his recent arrest of June 7th,
and all of the arrests dating back to August of 1987. Stan Caterbone had described
in detail his assertions and evidence that the arrests were conveniently
orchestrated while he was seeking legal recourse for the alleged ISC "Cover-Up'.
Stan Caterbone also explained his fear for not returning to the Stone Harbor
Municipality, in light of the fabricated arrests, and other questionable incidents.
Stan Caterbone requested another means of settling all outstanding frivolous traffic
violations, other than appearing in Stone Harbor Municipal Court. Stone Harbor
Municipal Court Judge, Peter M. Tourison, sends Stan Caterbone an official letter
acknowledging receipt of his previous letter and explanations. Judge Tourison
concluded his notice by demanding that Stan Caterbone appear in Court, as
scheduled, "to have this matter taken care of in the proper
manner.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>August 13, 1991 - Ferranti announces it has
recovered $650,000 hidden by Guerin in a number of Swiss Hank accounts. Ferranti
also announces a fiscal 1991 loss of $282 million. Stan Caterbone responds to Judge
Tourison letter of August 8, and discloses the recent attempt on his life, the past
June, just outside or Stone Harbor, and states that because of the apparent criminal
conspiracy within the same municipality, Stan Caterbone formally notifies the Judge
that he refuses to return to Court, as
requested.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>August 15, 1991 - Guerin and Cardoen are
shown to have been deeply involved in a failed $100 million arms procurement plot
linked to the infamous Iran-Contra
scandal.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><BR
formal notice and demand from American Helix President David D. Dering, for the
return or equipment, currently in the possession of Stan Caterbone, and notice of
the termination of the business agreement, dated October 1, 1990 between Stan J.
Caterbone and American Helix Technology Corporation. Stan Caterbone receives a
facsimile from Mike Hess (former ISC engineer who frequented S. Africa and who
solicited Stan Caterbone in late 1989 for work), and refuses to sign a non-disclosure
agreement with Stan Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group, Ltd., as requested
to continue a further relationship considering the recent activities from the May
23rd phone call and the national media publicity regarding the ISC
Scandal.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>August 19, 1991 - Stan Caterbone sends a
letter to attorney Timothy Lanza via the Lancaster Bar Association, and asks for an
explanation as to his misrepresenting to Stan Caterbone for the past month that his
order for Advanced Media Group, Ltd., stock certificates were ordered, when in fact
Stan Caterbone verified with authorized personnel of the H. Burr Kein company that
the order was never placed. Timothy Lanza had personally disclosed to Stan
Caterbone on several occasions that he was awaiting the delivery of the certificate
kit via UPS. Stan Caterbone responds to the previous letter of David D. Dering, and
his request for the return of American Helix equipment, currently in the possession
of Stan Caterbone. Stan Caterbone formally notifies David Dering that the
equipment will be held as collateral, according to statutes of the Pa. Uniform
Commercial Credit code, that the equipment will not he returned until the past due
invoice {# 1018), of the Advanced Media Group, Ltd., of July 12, 1991 for
$4,914.00, which was due upon receipt according to their business agreement, was
paid in full.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>August 29, 1991 - A federal judge dismisses
Christian's $93 million suit against Guerin, but Christian vows to re file the
suit.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>September 13, 1991 - ABC News/Nightline
features another story about ISC, the CIA, and Arms Deals, in preparation for the
beginning of the-Confirmation Hearings of George Bush's nomination or the Director
of the Central Intelligence Agency, Robert Gates, which begins just three days away,
by the Senate Intelligence
Committee.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>September 14, 1991 - Ferranti and Clark
reach an agreement to settle their legal battle, although either party does not
disclose details. September 16, 1991 - The first day of the Robert Gates'
Confirmation Hearings brings questioning by Senator Murkowski, of the Senate
Intelligence Committee, about knowledge of the ISC operations by Robert Gates.
Gates, whose candor about Iran-Contra resulted in his 1987 withdraw when
nominated for the same slot by then President Reagan. In a less-than sincere line of
questioning, Robert Gates denies any knowledge of ISC, Guerin, or Carlos Cardoen,
including any operations to sell munitions to Iraq or South Africa. In addition, he
denies any knowledge of any CIA involvement in the
same.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>September 19, 1991- Stan Caterbone visits
the office of Senator Bill Bradley (D-New Jersey), in the Hart Office Building,
Washington, D.C., and delivers documents, tapes, and a video, all relating to his
allegations of an alleged "Cover-Up" regarding the ISC Scandal. Assistant Jackie
Widrow, who signed a receipt, took the
materials.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>September 21, 1991- Stan Caterbone delivers
a contract for the consulting services he has agreed to provide to J. Oman Landis, in
order to insure against any wrongdoing, and especially in light of Mr. Landis'
assertion the previous Friday that "you (Stan Caterbone) are taking a break (from
business) to rest your mind". This assertion conveniently supports the alibi of
mental insanity, that has been made by numerous persons, including Mr. Landis'
friends, the High's, who wholly own American Helix Technology Corporation. Several
hours after delivering the contract to Mr. Landis, and after beginning to work, as
outlined in the contract, Mr. Landis called Stan Caterbone into his office and said
"there were some developments over the weekend, why don't you continue on your
normal duties of driving (limousines), this has nothing to do with the contract that
you asked me to
sign".</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>October 1, 1991 - Stan Caterbone receives a
facsimile from David Dering, President of American Helix, formally charging Stan
Caterbone with charges of 16,730.00. David Dering also demands that the
equipment be returned, and upon receipt, American Helix would forgive $11,816.00
($16,730 - $4914)(Caterbone's invoice) of unpaid charges to Stan Caterbone and or
the Advanced Media Group, Ltd., Stan Caterbone sends by certified mail, a copy of a
recent complaint (filed Sep. 6, 1991) to the New Jersey Department of Motor
Vehicles, and a demand for the title to his boat, and again allegations of criminal
wrongdoing by the Stone Harbor Marina, for not delivering title, given the bill of sale
was satisfied on June 10, 1991, and a fee for the title was paid as well. Stan
Caterbone personally meets with Ted Koppel, of ABC News/Nightline, at the
Washington National Airport, at approximately 5:30 pm. Stan Caterbone questioned
Ted Koppel if he knew a Mr. Jay Curtis, and why he was questioned about the CIA's
involvement with the ISC affairs, just hours before the broadcast. Ted Koppel denied
any knowledge of Mr. Jay Curtis, and stated that Thomas Flannery was involved in
the broadcast requested the phone number of Stan Caterbone, and said that he
would contact him later, due to his present time constraints, and asked "what do
you want, and what is the story line?" Stan Caterbone responded, "Justice and
protection, someone is trying to cover me up, and someone already made attempts
on my life... someone keeps getting information from me, while I'm left sitting in
Lancaster like a sitting
duck".</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>October 2, 1991 - Stan Caterbone responds
by facsimile, to the Oct. 1, correspondence, to David D. Dering. NOTES: Stan
Caterbone requested supportive documentation regarding the suspicious charges of
$16,730.00 as declared, in order to consider the request for the return of the
equipment. David C. Dering responds by facsimile, demanding for Stan Caterbone
to meet him at the Holiday Inn, in Lancaster on Friday, Oct 4th, with the equipment
in his possession, and states that he will deliver the required supportive
documentation of the charges as
requested. </AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM
><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>October 2, 1991 - Stan Caterbone responds
by facsimile to Ted Koppel, as to his question concerning the "story line" October 31,
1991 - Guerin and 19 others, including Larry Reach, are indicted on 75 criminal
counts by the Philadelphia based grand jury. Laura McQueen, administrator for the
New Jersey Department of Motor Vehicles, called Stan Caterbone at approximately
3:30 pm, to notify him that she was trying to sort out the problem with his
complaint regarding title to his boat. Ms. McQueen acknowledged that the Stone
Harbor Marina had submitted an application for a title, apparently dated on or about
June 10, however the identity of the boat did not match that of for Stan Caterbones.
Ms. McQueen also admitted that there seemed to be evidence of wrongdoing, but
denied to state whether the matter was presently being investigated. Ms. McQueen
also stated that the title in question was being microfiche, and that within a few
days, they should be able to trace the title, and resolve the problem. Robert Clyde
Ivy, Terrance Faulds, Wayne Radcliffe, Gerald Schuler, and Thomas Jaslin enter not
guilty pleas to all charges handed down by the Philadelphia grand
jury.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>November 24, 1987 - Robert Shireman, ISC
financial executive pleads his guilt in the ISC $billion fraud and
scandal.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>November 25, 1987 - Anthony Stagq, ISC
executive in charge of Singapore operations, pleads guilty in the Arms Export
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>November 27, 1987- ISC Executive Larry
Resch pleads guilty to his role in the massive contract fraud in the Ferranti/ISC
merger of November,
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>December 3, 1991 - Philadelphia grand jury
hands down a "superseding indictment", clarifying the money laundering portion of
the charges. The indictment states that between November of 1986 and June of
1989, Guerin looped $450 million through phony bank, vendor, -and customer
accounts to give the appearance several of the bogus ISC contracts were real. The
preceding information also allows for the possibility of an indictment of William
Clark, and possibly his attorney Joseph Roda. The largest of the fake contracts was
the Pakistan Missile deal, in which Larry Resch was charged and indicted by the
LLIPS.COM style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>grand jury for
managing. Stan Caterbone's best friend in the whole world, little "Abbey Pflumm",
shouts his name, "Taan", for the first
time.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>December 3, 1991 -Mike Hess, a former ISC
engineer that also has done work for Stan Caterbone, visits
LLIPS.COM style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Stan
Caterbone to deliver all materials in his possession which is the property of the
Advanced Media Group, Ltd., Stan Caterbone and Mike Hess engage in an argument
when Mike Hess becomes annoyed at Stan Caterbones continued caution and
suspicion of Mike Hess's real motives and agenda for the relationship. Stan
Caterbone had witnessed several incidents of inconsistencies with the attitude of
Mike Hess, with specific respect regarding Stan Caterbone's efforts for justice and
legal recourse concerning the affairs of 1987. Stan Caterbone admitted in several
occasions that he will never trust anyone, especially given his former association
with ISC, and most importantly his activities and travel to South
Africa.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>December 4, 1991 - Stan Caterbone calls the
Citizens Commission of Human Rights, after seeing the organization featured on the
Murray Povich Show, and talks to Roy Griffen. The organization's mission is to
investigate abuses within the mental illness profession. Roy Griffen requests
information, and agrees to investigate his allegations. Stan Caterbone states that he
will Federal Express a copy of this
chronology.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>December 5, 1991 - At approximately 10:00
am, Stan Caterbone sent a package of information via Federal Express (tracking
number 9734766S93)
to: </AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><CMAI
LBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Roy
Griffen</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Citizens Commission for Human
Rights</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>6362 Hollywood
Blvd.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Los Angeles, CA
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>(800) 869-
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>The package was received at 9:56 am (PST)
by L. Mezkerlsl, at the front
desk.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>December 5, 1991 - At approximately 4:52
pm, James Guerin pleads guilty to eight (B) grand jury indictments of October 31.
The indictments are as
follows:</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM> Criminal
Conspiracy</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM> Violation, Arms Export Control
Act</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM> Violation, Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid
act.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM> Money
Laundering</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM> Securities
Fraud</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM> Filing False Income Tax
Return</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM> Aiding and Abetting the Commission of
crime.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Sentencing is scheduled for February 25,
1992, with a minimum of 14 years, and a maximum of Life in
prison.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>December 4, 1991 - Stan Caterbone receives
uninvited visitors at his residence, cousin Sam Miller family, who in September left
him stranded in Florida. They conveniently need a place to stay, while visiting in
Lancaster, and purposely cause distractions to his efforts for legal
recourse.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>December 11, 1991- Stan Caterbone finally
requests that Michelle and Jason Miller vacate his
residence.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>December 20, 1991- Stan Caterbone
receivers a notice from the Internal Revenue Service regarding a discrepancy in
income reported on his 1989 Federal Income Tax Return. The items in question were
his "disability income" from Monarch life insurance and American Helix "non-
employee
income".</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>December 23, 1991- Stan Caterbone
responds to the IRS letter and submits a copy of the chronology of this conspiracy,
along with the entire audio transcript (2 - 90 minute cassettes) of his meeting of
September 29, 198? with the Pennsylvania Securities Finding of Facts Resulting in
Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Page 41 Commission and requests assistance in his ordeal.
The correspondence was sent via 'Return Receipt Requested" in order to insure
proof of delivery. Stan Caterbone sends an updated chronology to Roy Griffen of the
Citizen's Commission for Human
Rights.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>December 28, 1991- Stan Caterbone sends a
formal notice to attorney Howard Cerny, 245 Park Avenue, New York, informing him
to return the previously submitted information and tapes regarding this case, and
also informing him that he no longer wishes to discuss these issues with him or any
member of his
firm.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>December 30, 1991- Stan Caterbone travels
to the U.S. 9:50 am courthouse in Philadelphia, PA, and personally delivers the
chronology and a copy of the "1987" Pennsylvania Securities Commission meeting
to Chief Judge Bechtel, who is presiding over the ISC court preceding. 10:00 am
Stan Caterbone visits the U.S. Attorney Generals office in the same building and
files a formal complaint, "Criminal Conspiracy to "cover-up" the International Signal
a Control scandal. The proper form is filed with the clerk. Assistant U. S. Attorney
General Gray asks Stan Caterbone to briefly describe his complaint. Stan Caterbone
gives Gray the chronology along with the tapes. Stan Caterbone briefly describes
the meeting of June 23, 1987 with Larry Resch, the nay 23, 1991 phone call from Jay
Curtis, the arrests by Manheim Township, and the attempts on his life. Agent Gray
took notes, and said he is not
LLIPS.COM style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>familiar with
the case, but would personally see that the information is passed to the proper
authorities involved in the case. During the conversation, Mr. Gray asked the exact
same question that was asked by both Joe Roda and Investigator Eisler of the
Pennsylvania Securities Commission) "But you did not work for them (ISC), you were
not involved with them?" Stan Caterbone gave this response to all questions by Mr.
Gray: It's all in there (the chronology), all of the information and
events".</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>January 6, 1992 - Stan Caterbone sends a
copy of the criminal conspiracy chronology and a complete audio transcript of the
PA SEC meeting of 1987 to the legal counsel of the Pennsylvania Securities
Commission via Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested: P825 695
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>January 8, 1992 - At a "Town Meeting" in
Columbia, Pennsylvania held by U. S. Senator Arlen Spector, Stan Caterbone
personally delivers a copy of the criminal conspiracy chronology to Anon Spector
after the meeting and asks Arlen Spector to read the letter, Mr. Spector replied, " I
will do that".</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>January 9, 1992 - Stan Caterbone receives
the Return Receipt from the Pennsylvania SEC, signed by Sharon F. Heinspach on
January 8, 1992.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>November 8, 1997 Stan Caterbone solicits
Attorney Matt Samley, of the law firm of Xelkallis, Reese and Pugh, to provide a legal
opinion as to the circumstances involved in the cover up. Mr. Samley quickly asks if
anyone had called Stan Caterbone about the issues. Mr. Samley agrees to review
the documents and will provide a legal opinion of any criminal and prosecutorial
misconduct.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>November 23, 1997 - Stan Caterbone delivers
materials to Mr. Samley and also sends via Federal Express the same materials to
Christina Rainville, of Shnader, Harris, Lewis, and . With a letter requesting a
legal opinion from Ms.
Rainville.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>December, 8, 1997 - Ms. Pam Pflumm call Dr.
Albert Shultz regarding the behavior of Stan
Caterbone.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>December 15, 1997 - Stan Caterbone
telephones Jim Christian to again confirm that he did not have knowledge of his
meeting with Mr. Larry Resch. Jim Christian began threatening Stan Caterbone from
public disclosure of these issues; he said, You have to forget about it. Your life will
be worse off than it is now, you better just forget it
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>January 14, 1998 - Stan Caterbone visits with
Fr. Edward Lavelle for advice and guidance concerning his situation. Stan Caterbone
only asked that Fr. Lavelle call Mr. David Pflumm, and ask he and is key employees
refrain from inflicting any additional mental duress upon his person Fr. Lavelle
refuses unless he is told to do so by Dr. Al Shulz. He offers no further assistance.
1:00 pm A few hour later, Stan Caterbone visits Dr. Al Shulz for his quarterly
appointment. Immediately upon entering the appointment, and before the plaintiff
will speak any words, Dr. Al Shulz will contemporaneously accuse the plaintiff and
declare: Stan, you are very sick. You are not well! You need to take additional
medications. The recorded transcript will prove the horrid implications of these
conversations.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>February 20, 1998 The plaintiff is forced to
vacate his position of Controller of Pflumm Contractors, Inc., due to the purposeful
and intentional infliction of mental duress, perpetrated as a direct reprisal against
the Plaintiffs rightful pursuit of due process of the law concerning all issues
contained herein.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>April 21, 1998 The Pennsylvania Department
of Labor and Industry will again illegally deny the Plaintiff of his legitimate claim for
Unemployment Compensation Benefits, which again is an act of reprisal against his
rightful pursuit of fair access to the law, and his disclosures of the incidents
contained
herein. </AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>The Pennsylvania Department of Labor and
Industrys 1987 rulings against the Plaintiff have been also proven to be in err,
which conveniently and intentionally subjects the Plaintiff to financial hardship and
mental duress, all purposefully hindering the Plaintiffs right to access the law. The
record of the plaintiffs claim for Unemployment Compensation Benefits is
corrupted. </AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Diary of Mental Duress Pflumm Contractors,
Inc., </AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>I started to log incidents of mental duress in
December of 1997 after the incidents became consistent and demonstrated not be
random acts of mere occurrences. This behavior and malicious treatment was an
extreme divergence from the previous 45 months of my tenure and a polarization of
my relationships with all employees involved, including Mr. David
Pflumm.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Ms. Susan Bare (Office Manager, Reporting
Directly To Me)</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>In December, her attitude became especially
hostile toward me, upon many occasions challenging my computer knowledge when
in fact she has limited experience. She had continued to persist in wanting to
change procedures, which I had repeatedly told her that systems are reviewed at
the end of the fiscal year, and any necessary changes would only be made during
the off-season, as in previous years. She had continued to challenge my authority,
which was out-of -character, and not consistent with her job description. She had
often become upset and snippy when I would not go out and get her lunch, which
was not in my job
description.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROU
P01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM
><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIP
S.COM><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP0
1@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Mr. James Leonards, (Asphalt Paving
Supervisor)</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>In the week preceding Christmas vacation,
Mr. Leonards had requested that I submit a form to Wholsen Contractors, which was
incidental to any contracts. The form requested banking accounts, which I had
refused to answer. I would not release the corporate confidential banking
information to a General Contractor of whom we were at credit risk for collecting
payments for services rendered, not the other way around. Mr. Leonards continued
to harass me about the document, and kept waiving the document in front of my
face. He continued, and I told him to have Wholsen call me. I had counted five
incidents regarding this document, which I never submitted. This information was
immaterial to any negotiations with Wholsen, and was intended only as a means of
mental duress.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Mr. Leonards had shown interest in learning
estimating software on the computer. He persistently requested the opportunity,
and I had suggested that he evaluate competing software before any final decisions
were made. He had on his own, obtained a demonstration of software, which he
evaluated. It was not what we required, and before Christmas, I had procured
another demonstration disc for his evaluation. He promised to evaluate that
software over the Christmas vacation. Mr. Leonards kept giving me excuses, and
was never evaluated., merely to inflict mental
duress.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>On many occasions Mr. Leonards insisted on
challenging my computer knowledge with incidental technical questions, knowing
that I was becoming annoyed. Mr. Leonards only began working on a computer at
home, within the past several
months.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>On January 15th, I went out to start my car,
and Mr. Leonards and Mr. Ralph Carruthers from the lobby door, made gestures at
me thinking that I was leaving, when in fact I was merely warming up my car. When
I returned to the lobby, Mr. Leonards and Mr. Carruthers had disappeared.
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>On or about February 24th, upon logging into
my AOL account, a Buddy List message from Mr. James Leonards appeared on my
computer screen that said Stan is that you?. The only way that I am able to
receive Buddy List messages is to sign up for the service, of which I had never
done, which means that Mr. Leonards must have illegally accessed my account and
signed my account up for the service. The evening before, a neighbor saw me
looking for my cats with a spot light, and yelled Stan is that you?. This is certainly
a clear example of mental duress, among other electronic privacy
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Mr. John Brown, (Truck
Driver)</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>On January 9th, Mr. John Brown was receiving
his pay check and made the following remark Stan, why didnt you go to Cancun
with Dave, you look like one of those
Mexicans.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>LN Dockey (Office Assistant, part-time)
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Consistently called my car phone upon
leaving the office to ask where I was going, and when I was coming back, which was
none of her business. She reported to me, I did not report to her. She knew that this
annoyed me, and was out-of-character and inconsistent with prior
behavior.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Mr. Brian Langsett
(Subcontractor)</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Mr. Brian Langsett continued to make calls to
my home, and during the week of February 20th, screamed and yelled into my voice
mail, which resulted in my changing my line to a private phone line. Mr. Langsett
consistently left messages on my voice mail, knowing that I was not going to
answer them
back.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHI
LLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Mr. Ralph Carruthers
(General
Manager)</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>On January 22nd, Mr. Ralph Carruthers
entered my office and requested that I redo a pay application for the Lancaster
Township Park Avenue project that I had done. I informed him that I had nothing to
do with that pay application because I was on vacation. He stormed out of my
office, mad that I wouldnt redo the pay application and telling me that I had done
it. Immediately following his departure, Mr. David Pflumm stormed into my office
and got inches away from my face and said Do you and Ralph have a problem,
what is your problem? I nervously and quite upset said, Dave, I didnt prepare that
pay application, I was on vacation. Mr. Pflumm replied, Yes you did. I immediately
said, Dave, mental duress is a serious matter, you dont mess with someones
mind, like that you just dont play with someones mind like this., I was on vacation
Mr. Pflumm went on to say that I did do the pay application. I asked him Do you
have a problem with me? He replied
no.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>I later went to the file and retrieved the
original pay application for Lancaster Townships Park Avenue. Mr. David Pflumm
with his handwriting prepared it. I later showed it to him and he said nothing. THIS
IS MENTAL
DURESS.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Mr. David Pflumm
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>In August of 1997, I was responsible for the
formulation, presentation, and collection of a Change Order for the removal of rock
at the Cecil County Community College, which we subcontracted the work from e.e.
Murray Construction Company. We had negotiated a unit price per cubic yard of rock
removed, and we were required to document the measurements, which accounted
for a billing of some $275,000 to e.e.
Murray.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>I had spent several hundred hours on the
project, most of which I had done at my office at home. Through November, it
became apparent that the e.e. Murray was trying to pass on their own problems and
mistakes with their contract with the College to us, in an effort to relieve themselves
of the $275,000 contractual liability they had with Pflumm Contractors, Inc., This
process was an enormous burden, given the impact the loss would have to our
financial, and especially considering that e.e. Murray had no legal loophole to avoid
payment to us, regardless of any dispute they had with the college. I had proven
this through thorough documentation and the specifics of our contractual
arrangements.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>My policy and the policy of Pflumm
Contractors, Inc., up to this point had always been to take legal action after all other
efforts for collections and contract disputes have failed. I had demonstrated an
outstanding performance in reducing the amount of bad receivables, which had
almost caused the company into bankruptcy prior to my affiliation. More Mr. David
Pflumm had always demonstrated a hard line stance in all collection matters, even
to the extreme of causing the dismissal of his own employee for failing to reimburse
the company for a $700 repair bill. Mr. David Pflumm was not known for his fairness
or good faith negotiating. His tendency was to inflate production figures, and was
lack in leniency to anyone that owed him money. This was clearly demonstrated in
past contractual disputes with the Hershey Library, Dutch Family Inn, Consolidated
Construction, and various other small accounts. His policy was consistent no matter
what the amount of the payable. Mr. Pflumm was quick to take legal action in all
disputes as soon as negotiations proved
fruitless.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>As early as late October I had advised Mr.
Pflumm that we were exhausting our efforts for collection of the $275,000 and that
e.e. Murray was not negotiating in good faith and was in my opinion engaging in
fraudulent tactics. This transaction was of even greater importance than any other
bad receivable due to the fact that a majority of the funds at risk were pure profits.
As early as November, it was the advise of our corporate attorney, Mr. Matt Samley
of Xakellis, Reese and Pugh, that a civil law suit should be immediately filed. I had
Mr. Matt Samley detail all of the legal parameters of his legal opinion supporting his
contentions.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>In November, I had informed Mr. David
Pflumm that I personally removed myself form the dispute on the grounds that e.e.
Murray Construction Company was not acting in good faith, I had exhausted all
available resources and means of collecting the monies without a civil law suit being
filed, and Mr. David Pflumm refused to take legal
action.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>By my departure on February 20th, all efforts
for collecting the $275,000 proved fruitless, and Mr. David Pflumm continued his
procrastination of filing a civil lawsuit. I am of the firm belief that the many of the
negotiations and situations surrounding the collection of payments from e.e. Murray
was strategically used as ploy to inflict mental duress for the following
reasons:</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>1. I had exhausted most of my time during
September, October, and November while also managing my regular duties, and
had requested a fee for the collection of funds that was well beyond the scope of
my
duties. </AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>2. e.e. Murray Construction Company had no
legal foundation for not paying Pflumm Contractors, Inc., regardless of whether e.e.
Murray collected the funds from the Cecil County Community
College. </AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>3. e.e Murray had collected enough funds
from Cecil County Community College in January, and still refused any payment to
Pflumm Contractors,
Inc., </AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><CM
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>4. Mr. David Pflumm had exhibited and
demonstrated an extreme sense of leniency toward filing a civil lawsuit that was
unprecedented during my tenure and in the history of the
company. </AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM>
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>5. Over half of the $275,000 was cash for the
company. </AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM>
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>6. I allege that during the month of February,
communications were used to deceive the true nature of the
situation. </AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM>
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>7. Mr. Pflumm had always taken my advice on
such matters during my
tenure. </AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>8. Lastly, the only reasonable explanation for
not filing a civil complaint is that the situation was not being truly disclosed by Mr.
David Pflumm and e.e. Murray and that a lawsuit would become public record and
has adverse and irrevocable damages to e.e. Murray Construction
Company.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>In late January Mr. David Pflumm laid a large
envelope addressed to his home on my desk. Inside was a letter addressed to me
from Airways Charter Service, including a brochure depicting a plane, identical to
that which was illegally repossessed from me in 1987. This was clearly a
demonstrated tactic for mental duress. In the history of my tenure, we have never
discussed or had any remote need for such a service, and more importantly, the
package was addressed to Mr. David Pflumms
home.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>On week of February 20th, Mr. David Pflumm
had provided me with documentation that required my signature from Town &
Country Leasing for my automobile that that had I signed would have given the
leasing company the right to repossess the automobile at any given time while
providing me with no legal recourse to prevent such repossession. Mr. Pflumm had
agreed to personally guarantee the payments for the automobile for the duration of
the lease, under any and all circumstances. He has breached his
agreement.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP0
1@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM></DIV>
size=2><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP0
1@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.C
OM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>During the weeks preceding my departure, in the
course of my travels, I had passed many employees on many different occasions
during the course of the day. On every occasion, not one employee would
acknowledge me with a gesture or
waive.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILB
OX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></C
MAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01
@MSN.COM>During my tenure at Pflumm Contractors, Inc., not only did I resurrect
the company from near bankruptcy, and restore the company to the best financial
condition it has ever experienced, even as important was the management policies
that I had implemented that had for the first time given the employees fair and
equitable place of employment. And their gratitude was often displayed and
demonstrated toward me. The behavior of the company, as a whole, was drastically
out of character and malicious, which had resulted in a hostile environment directly
threatening my mental welfare. There is not a reason in the world where I should
have been so maliciously treated. The pain and suffering was so great, that I
specifically sought the advice and help of Fr. Edward Lavelle on January 14th, in the
Office of the
Bishop.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAIL
BOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></
CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM></DIV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM> Any further detail to this document
would greatly compromise my rights for any future litigation, which may or may not
transpire. I Attest, Stanley J.
Caterbone </AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM
>
<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify"><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>August 2001 AIM
Management Company begins to systematically sabotage my business with al l of
the Wholesale Representatives and Advanced Media Group, which resulted in the
loss of approximately $50,000 per year of revenues. This was is the beginning of the
loss of my earning capacity to present.
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>2002 to 2004 Day trading business was
again sabotaged by malicious mirror trading of my stock portfolio resulting in the
loss of profitability on my trading transactions. Persons and or organizations would
systematically trade against me while also employing techniques of psychological
tactics to distract me from concentrating on my own instinctive nature and financial
analysis required for
profitability.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Dec 16, 2004 Plaintiff sends a complaint to
Agent Sarsfield of the Pennsylvania Attorney Generals Office in Pittsburg regarding
illicit telephone
activities:</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>December 15,
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Office of Attorney of
General</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Bureau of Consumer
Protection</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Pittsburgh Regional
Office</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>6th Floor, Manor
Building</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Pittsburgh, PA
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Attn: Ms. Shannon J.
Sarsfield</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Ref: Verizon Customer Relations, C-006142-
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Dear Ms.
Sarsfield:</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>I appreciate your review of the
aforementioned file. I was also in receipt of the November 19, 2004 response of the
complaint from Verizon. For the record, I have made several previous attempts prior
to the July 28th request to be place on their Do Not Call list. I had made several calls
in the previous months, and the calls did not stop. My telephone has been used as a
means of harassment and intimidation, with my calls often being intercepted,
misdirected, or impersonated. And often calls from Out of Area made several
times a day, with no answer. If you were to do an audit of my calls (in/out) over the
last several years, you would reveal the nature of these
activities.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Dec 16, 2004 Plaintiff sends a complaint to
Agent Sarsfield of the Pennsylvania Attorney Generals Office in Pittsburg regarding
illicit telephone
activities:</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>December 15,
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Office of Attorney of
General</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Bureau of Consumer
Protection</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Pittsburgh Regional
Office</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>6th Floor, Manor
Building</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Pittsburgh, PA
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Attn: Ms. Shannon J.
Sarsfield</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Ref: Verizon Customer Relations, C-006142-
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Dear Ms.
Sarsfield:</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>I appreciate your review of the
aforementioned file. I was also in receipt of the November 19, 2004 response of the
complaint from Verizon. For the record, I have made several previous attempts prior
to the July 28th request to be place on their Do Not Call list. I had made several calls
in the previous months, and the calls did not stop. My telephone has been used as a
means of harassment and intimidation, with my calls often being intercepted,
misdirected, or impersonated. And often calls from Out of Area made several
times a day, with no answer. If you were to do an audit of my calls (in/out) over the
last several years, you would reveal the nature of these
activities.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Dec 16, 2004 Approx 1:00 pm Plaintiff meets
with Michael Landis, County Detective for Lancaster County, in his office at the
Lancaster Courthouse to discuss J. Karpathious and death threats and the Southern
Regional Police Department. Plaintiff sends email to Michael Landis and a copy of
the 1998 Affidavit in the email. Supreme Court announces plans to review Lambert
Appeal the next
day.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Dear Mr.
Landis,</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Thank you for taking the time to meet with
me yesterday. I appreciate your time. I understand your frustration in trying to
understand the circumstances regarding my situation. I have enclosed a document,
which I authored in 1998 to help you. Also, if you could, maybe you could help to
facilitate my application for food stamps with the County Assistance Office. I would
appreciate it.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Feb 18, 2005 - Plaintiff sends the following
letter to the Chief of Police of the Southern Regional Police
Department:</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>February 18,
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Chief John A.
Fiorill</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Southern Regional Police
Department</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>3284 Main
Street</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>P.O. Box
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Conestoga, PA
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Dear Chief
Fiorill:</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>I am very disappointed in the way that our
meeting had ended. I will be filing complaints With the appropriate authorities
concerning the threats and abuse by Officer Busser. Remember you had requested
that meeting. And as you stated, I do not believe anything that you say, well Sir,
that is certainly your choice, however I have never provided anything but the truth
to you or any member of your department. The burden of proof to my allegations
falls within your jurisdiction. If you are telling me that I have to prove every
allegation when I report a crime, I just dont know how that is possible. But you are
the Chief of the department, so I guess I will have to protect my person and
property in any manner that deems appropriate. I apologize for becoming loud and
frustrated, however when you tell me that I am lying and I am most certainly telling
the truth; and then you and Mr. Busser yell that I am nuts and to get out of here;
and that no one will respond to any of my calls to your office, well we have a very
serious problem. You both have challenged my integrity, my truthfulness, credibility,
and my sanity. And Mr Busser pulling out his night stick and holding it up to hit me,
that is more than enough for me.
LLIPS.COM style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>I get the
picture loud and clear. I hope that you do as
well.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Cc: Donald Totaro, Lancaster County District
Attorney</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Feb 19, 2005 Plaintiff files the following
complaint with the The Internet Fraud Complaint Center (IFCC) after the incident of
Kerry Egan calling 911 to file a false report of plaintiff sending an email stating to
kill himself.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Saturday, February 19,
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>The Internet Fraud Complaint Center (IFCC) is
a partnership between the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the National
White Collar Crime Center
(NW3C).</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>February 19, 2005 7:26
am</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>At approximately 5:00 am this morning the
Conestoga Police entered my home and accused me of sending an email to Kerry
Egan threatening to kill myself. The officer verbally and physically abused me
because I did not know what he was talking about and he kept interrogating me and
handcuffed me because I said that I was not on the internet after 10:00 pm on
February 18, the evening before. The officer told me that I sent an email to Kerry
Egan and she called 911 at approximately 5:00 am this morning. I told the officer
that I did I fell asleep at approximately 1:00 am and did not awake until the officer
arrived at my house. The officer was quite abusive and tried to accuse me of
lunging at him, when in fact he was throwing me around. Pam Pflumm, who
previously filed trespass charges against me, and whom I was to have no contact
with, illegally entered my home with the officer, via a key which I had kept on the
deck. Before they entered my home, I called 911 and requested that the
Pennsylvania State Police come to my aid because of the verbal and physical
threats that I received earlier in the day from Officer Busser and Chief of Police
Fiorill of the Southern Regional Police Department. After they had left, I took a
shower and almost collapsed from exhaustion and trauma. I got dressed and went
to the emergency room of Regional Hospital, former Saint Joseph Hospital. Dr. Laird
attended to my
concerns.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Feb 20, 2005 Plaintiff calls Southern Regional
Police Department and Humane League to file formal complaint of Cruelty to
Animals. Both refused to investigate or file any reports. Complaint phoned in to the
Humane League on Feb 20, 2005 As described to a Letter To The Editor, Gil Smart
While I was away for a family emergency, I had someone let my two cats out after
being inside for a few days, which I have always done in the past. I returned after
being in South Florida for one week. Upon driving toward my driveway, my one cat
was anxiously awaiting my arrival. However, my second cat was not there. This was
an immediate cause for concern, since being mother and son; they had always
stuck together. After a few days I knew that my cat was either abducted or was
harmed. No way would he be around and not come home. The other evening I went
over to my suspect neighbors home, which I know often has been mischievous
toward my property in the past, and asked him if he saw my cat. He went on to tell
me how big my cat is and how he is the "king of the neighborhood". I found this
conversation to be typical bull.... He said "don't worry it will show up soon!" Last
evening I found my dead cat lying by my pond with a possum chewing on its ear. I
examined the body and found that its neck had been broken with no other signs of
any other wounds. I called the Humane Shelter and talked to a Cruelty Officer who
said" There is nothing we can do if you did not see anyone physically harm the
animal Is this the way it is? You have to prove a crime before they will investigate?
Sounds a little backwards to me, but then again I often forget where I am
at.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Feb 21, 2005 Plaintiff sends letter to Fulton
Bank regarding the death of Thomas Caterbone and the alleged indiscretions and
illegalities of the activities of Fulton
Bank.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Monday, February 21,
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Project
Hope</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Mr. Scott
Smith</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Fulton Financial
Corporation</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>One Penn
Square</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>P.O. Box
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Lancaster, PA
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Dear Mr.
Smith:</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>The reason I had called you on Friday
morning was to discuss an outstanding issue with you. I am not threatening you or
coming to you as an adversary, but rather just trying to understand how your
institution can be so cold and rude to my family. On Thursday I visited the Manor
Branch to discuss the account for Tom's Project Hope, our nonprofit foundation that
advocates awareness for suicide prevention, with a focus for teenagers. Of course
this foundation was founded after the suicide of my youngest brother, Tom, in 1996.
Well, I never had so much trouble trying to gain access to our account's statements
than I did on that day. All that I heard was how much I would have to pay to get
copies of the statements. Which in itself is a little disheartening, considering we are
a non-profit giving something back to the community. We are a major donor for
CONTACT Lancaster. And it is this attitude that inspired me to address the very
reason Tom's Project Hope was unfortunately founded. I had asked the Customer
Service person what would happen if I made an attempt to deposit a check in an
account that did not have funds available at that time. She said "we have to give
you the choice to deposit the check or wait until there are funds". I said are you
sure, she said "oh yes, you have the choice to make the deposit or not". I said that
is what I thought was the policy or rule. In 1996 my brother, Tom, had his accounts
with your bank. He was given a check in the amount of approximately $60,000 by
an account from Ms. John Depatto.
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Forgive me but I do not have the energy to
retrieve all of the details at this time. My brother went to the Manor Branch to
deposit that check, and was refused on at least 3 occasions from making that
deposit. I know this because he was calling me asking for advise and help. I
remember telling him to seek legal counsel because this was not right. Your tellers
refused to take the check for deposit because there were no funds available. I kept
telling him that this was wrong and that he should make the deposit incase funds
became available the check would be honored. But your tellers kept refusing to
make that deposit. I then went on to learn that funds did become available and
were paid to other entities that had NSF checks waiting for funds, which would have
been behind my brothers check had your tellers accepted that deposit. If you
carefully review the financial problems my brother encountered prior to his death,
you would see that this was the one transaction that started a spiral of events that
caused him a great amount of stress and duress. And I know this because I was
trying to help him. I eventually took him to the emergency room of St. Joseph
Hospital just 4 days prior to his death.
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Now, Sir, you tell me how you would feel if
you were in my position, and what would you want to happen. I have kept this to
myself for far too long, and since I have had my own problems with your institution
in a similar way back in 1987. I would like to understand why we are treated like
this, and ask that these matters be addressed. Put yourself in my position, would
you want anything less?
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Feb 22, 2005 Plaintiff sends email to
Lancaster District Attorney Donald Totaro after Supreme Court announces the
Supreme Court of the United States is reviewing Lambert Case, one day after
Plaintiff reviews affidavit for the first time in 7
years.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Dear
Don:</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Just so there are no misunderstandings, I
have never had, nor do I have now, any information regarding the Lambert
proceedings. I have never spoken to anyone concerning the same. I am very
suspect as to the timing of this announcement and find it very disturbing given the
document that I had innocently resurrected after 8 years. My only intent in writing
that document was to find resolve for my own tragic situation. I believe a jury trial
would have been the only fair way for an equitable resolution to this case. Had that
occurred in the beginning, I don't believe we would be confronting this issue today. I
meant no disrespect toward your office or that of the state. As far as the police, it is
the same, except that I was very angered at the few that have treated me with such
malice, which is in no way a condemnation for the men in blue. I was literally
fighting for my life, and still continue to this
day.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Feb 26, 2005 Plaintiff sends letter to
President Bush and White House staff addressing concerns regarding National
Security Issues and this case and receives positive signal to proceed to court.
Iraq</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>National Security
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>To: President George W.
Bush</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>From: Mr. Stan Caterbone
<AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM
></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Subject: Write a
Supporting Comment on National Security
(Iraq)</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHI
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@
MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Dear President
Bush:</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHI
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>I need to know if
any information contained herein compromises the security of the United States of
America. I have been getting mixed signals as to this question, and my life has been
constantly Threatened because of this document. I would submit to a polygraph to
verify the credibility of any of the facts contained in this document. I was the sole
author of this writing back in 1998. If you believe that this document does threaten
our National Security, I would like to personally deliver the accompanying
information assets to yourself or the National Security Agency upon request. If you
believe that this document does not compromise the National Security in any
manner, then I would ask that you uphold my civil liberties in continuing my efforts
to adjucate these matters and find an opportunity for remedy in the appropriate
court of
law.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHIL
LIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Mar 14, 2005
Plaintiff files complaint to the American Civil Liberties Union of Philadelphia, PA after
the Intake Director directed plaintiff in filing
protocols.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BU
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>March 14,
2005</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHI
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>American Civil
Liberties Union Of
Pennsylvania</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX
@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Philadelphia,
PA</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLI
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>intake@aclupa.or
g</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIP
S.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Re:
Complaint</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@B
UYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>I have had many
persons levy attacks and harassment upon me with explicit statements defaming
my character and slandering me with such statements as calling me "insane, crazy
and nuts". I have been abused, both emotionally and physically, which are a matter
of record, by the Southern Regional Police Department, formally the Conestoga
Police Department. I have had several fabrications and false reports concerning
alleged suicide attempts, all of which have been proved to be total lies. There has
been total disregard for my civil liberties and numerous violations of my civil rights.
All of these incidents are intended to provoke and illicit the very same behavior they
accuse me of; that of being mentally
unstable.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BU
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>The reason for
this is simple, to discredit my allegations and to prevent me from taking legal action
and to block access of due process against the private and public entities of the
County of Lancaster, and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. These attacks,
harassment, and intimidation began in June of 1987 and continue today. In the last
several weeks, in the matter of 4 days, I was detained and abused by Police in the
middle of the night on 2 different occasions. At 4:00 am one morning a person
called 911 and reported that I had emailed a message threatening to commit
suicide, proven to be a lie. I had a Police Officer raised his nightstick and threaten to
hit me while he was in a violent rage, only to have another officer take step in and
disarm him. I have had the Police literally break into my home, because I would not
open the door, for fear of my safety after being abused the previous day. The officer
handcuffed me and shoved me around because I would not admit to wanting to kill
myself. In the last several weeks I have had no less than 6 persons attack my
mental stability and in an effort to break me emotionally. In 1987 I had made public
allegations of fraud against a Defense Contractor, International Signal& Control
(I was a shareholder), after a meeting in which they wanted me to finance some
questionable activities. From that meeting forward, these illicit and malicious acts
have been occurring quite frequently. It cost me money, financial opportunity,
friends, time; and everything imaginable except my life. And there was at least one
attempt on that. In 1987 ISC was in the midst of a multi-million dollar merger with
the British Defense Contractor, Ferranti International. My allegations caused grave
consequences to that deal. Four years later executives of ISC were indicted for the
"largest fraud in U.S.
</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS
.COM><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>History"; ($1
Billion dollars), and for exporting arms to Iraq by way of South Africa. In 1987, when
I made these allegations, I was making the first digital movie; ironically, I received
the original patent research materials days after that meeting with ISC, from a
prominent patent law firm in Philadelphia. I have been
.COM><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Arrested at least
on 6 occasions, and the most outlandish, for stealing my own files from my own
office. I have spent 6 days in prison. I have been taken to the Hospital on 2
occasions, and have been detained by police on several other occasions for persons
making false claims that I threatened to commit suicide. I have never been
convicted of any crime, and all charges are conveniently discharged before any
court proceedings. All charges of suicide have been proven to be false allegations
and fraudulent false reports. In the last week, I had obtained my medical records
from the Regional Medical Center, while I was maliciously and fraudulently admitted
there after my arrest in 1987, and there are 3 reports from 3 different psychiatrists
which all reveal that there was never any attempt by anyone in the Hospital
administration or medical staff to validate any of my statements; which in and of
themselves were used to indict me and support the diagnosis of manic depression.
Of, course, all of my statements were true, which all are methodically proven in the
following supporting documents. I have had my airplane, loaded with all of my files,
repossessed in the middle of the night by the Common National Bank of Lancaster
(Mellon), before any payments were due. This happened immediately after my
meeting with International Signal & Control, in 1987. I was trying to find safe
haven in Stone Harbor, New Jersey, where we were making a movie. Tony Bongiovi,
of Power Station Studio in New York, had solicited me to help him produce the 1st
Digital Movie, again in 1987.I have been precluded from any seeking any kind of
remedy in the courts due to the sensitive nature and involvement of National
Security issues. It has been reported that the CIA and National Security Agency
were all involved in covert and possibly rogue activities with ISC and the export of
arms to Iraq (Cluster Bombs). This was one of the questions that Robert Gates had
to answer in his Confirmation Hearings for Director of the CIA in 1990 by the
Chairman of the Committee (I have the CNN video). There was also a "Presidential
Finding" that was said to be filed by then President George H. Bush regarding the
same. The following are supporting documents and complaints that I filed and are
forwarding to
you:</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHIL
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>March 23, 2005
Letter to Phi Wenger, President of Fulton
Bank;</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPH
ILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Email to Phillip
Wenger</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYP
HILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>President of
Fulton
Bank</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHI
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Lancaster,
PA</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLI
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Phil:</AMGROUP0
1@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>For the Record-
.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM> 1. The
Project Hope Account; Project Hope was founded in 1996 with it's mission stated in
its non-profit organization charter to raise funds for the intention of contributing to
the education and awareness of mental illness and suicide prevention. Since it's
inception, I was the sole administrator of all monies that were dispersed and
donated to various local organizations to further that cause. These relationships
included; The Lancaster County Mental Health Alliance, The Schreiber Pediatric
Center, Contact Lancaster. I also was responsible for the local production of the
video "Numbers Don't Lie" (educational video for teenage suicide prevention) and
distributing that video to a host of local schools, churches, and faith based
organizations. Since about 2001, Project Hope has not made any contributions from
it's account, while at the same time continuing to raise funds from the annual golf
tournament. In excess of $9,000 was accumulated. Every year I questioned Phil and
Mike about the contributions and what organization they were going to give the
money to. In December of 2004, Lois Gascho, Executive Director of Contact
Lancaster, personally called me asking if we could help her with some money. At
that time, her affiliation with the League of Churches had been terminated and
Contact Lancaster was without funding, and the 24/7 Suicide Hotline for Lancaster
was at risk of being shut down. I told her I would contact my brothers and get her
some help. There was an article in the Lancaster Newspapers about the funding
problems and I emailed Mike, Phil, and Jimmy Karpathious the article and message
that Lois called me asking for help. Nothing was done. I kept trying to tell them that
they were not operating the Project within IRS guidelines, and their non-profit tax-
exempt status was in jeopardy for not distributing the monies accumulated, as
required in the IRS regulations concerning the same. When I was down at Mike's last
month, I found the account statements for Project Hope and being that I am a
Signatory on the account, took the entire file with me and started to disperse the
monies. I made one check out to Lancaster Contact for $2500. When I met with Lois
Gascho of Contact Lancaster to give her the check, she wanted to give me a tour of
the facility where the suicide hotline operates. While visiting, she was saying how
difficult it is to find volunteers to staff the hotline. I suggested that I could design
systems, with technology, that could allow volunteers to staff the hotline while
working from home. This would help Contact Lancaster a great deal in attracting
more volunteers to help staff the hotline. Remember, the hotline is located
downtown, and volunteers must come and go during all hours of the night to staff
the hotline. I designed a conceptual system and called D&E Communications to
provide a proposal to provide the required software and telecommunications
technology to build the system. I expect to receive that proposal on Friday. I will be
making a legal challenge to gain control of that account with the Internal Revenue
Service and the Tax-Exempt status of the Project.
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>2. Fulton Account
When my Mom got sick while in Florida, it was determined, by her, that she could
not live alone anymore. Our house at 1250 Fremont Street was in dire need of
painting and other maintenance for sometime. I told my mother that I was going to
do these tasks now, incase we have to sell the house. They house is 2 stories, which
is more difficult for my mother to live in. In January I decided that I would make sure
the house is ready to put on the market by springtime, and if we decide not to have
to sell the house, it would be already done and could be sold at anytime without any
repairs needed. At the same time, I setup the Fulton Account with online banking so
that I could manage my mothers bills, and pay them from Lancaster without having
her try to take care of this herself. My mother memory has been a deteriorating
problem since the fall of last year. To give you an example, while in Florida last
month, I was taking my mother out for breakfast, we were driving around looking for
a restaurant, and she looked at me in the car and asked if we had eaten yet! She
agreed that it would be best that I manage her bills, hence the Power of Attorney for
the Fulton Account and online banking. The $2,000 transfer was for the renovations
at 1250 Fremont that I am currently doing. I will now fund that project myself,
because I do not want to be bothered with this at a later time. So, there you have
the truth about the accounts. So be
it.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLI
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>May 2, 2005
Plaintiff files a complaint with Capital Blue
Cross</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHI
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>May 2,
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Capitol Blue
Cross</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHI
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Adult Basic
Program</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUY
PHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>P.O. Box
777014</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYP
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Harrisburg, PA
17177-
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Re: Policy
H200460959 & Policy
Laps</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHI
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>As per my
meeting in with your customer service representative on Friday, April 29th, at your
home office in Harrisburg, this is a letter of appeal for the lapsed policy and also a
letter containing the complaints concerning the charges from the Lancaster
Regional Medical Center and Dr. Laird, the attending emergency room physician, on
February 19th, 2005, as per the request of the customer service representative.
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM> 1) As per
the lapse in policy, I was told by Kay Richmond, of Cash Processing Services (717-
541-7262) on several phone calls that there was a 30-day grace period. She had
told me that although it is not stated, there is a 30 day grace period for your
policy. I had called because my mail has been tampered with, and I questioned the
rule of no grace period, and the policy being dependant on Blue Cross receiving my
payments via the mail. If this person who misrepresented herself to me as a
representative of your company was not who she said she was, this would certainly
not be the first time. Enclosed you will find a complaint that I filed with the Agent
Shannon J. Sarsfield, of the Pittsburg Regional Office of the PA Attorney General. In
that complaint I stated, My telephone has been used as a means of harassment
and intimidation, with my calls often being intercepted, misdirected, or
impersonated. See the enclosed copy of the complaint.
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM> 2) As per
my reason to visit your home office on April 29th, to discuss the charges from the
emergency room visit on February 19th, I have enclosed all relevant documents for
your use in determining the validity of the charges from both Regional Medical
Hospital and the emergency room physician, Dr. Laird. Please direct any and all
communications to me at the above address or amgroup01@msn.com, or phone
717-380-
5903.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPH
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>June 2,
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Judicial Conduct
Board</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPH
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>RE:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Stanley J.
Caterbone</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@B
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>District Court 02-
2-
06</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLI
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Docket Number
NT: 0000132-
05</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLI
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Commonwealth
Court of Common
Please</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYP
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Appeal Docket
No. CP-36-SA-00000141-
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Explanation of
Complaint</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@B
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>1. Previous to
hearing, I entered the offices of the District Magistrate and requested a meeting
with him to review the rules for procedure for his courtroom. He belligerently yelled
at me and told me that I will determine who is guilty in this case and threw me
out of his office. 2. I immediately contracted the Lancaster County Court Reporters
(LCCR) service to record the
hearing.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUY
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>2. I requested and
paid a service fee to have 4 witnesses subpoenaed for my defense. Prior to the start
of the hearing, the District Magistrate never gave me an opportunity to explain the
reason for calling my witnesses, and collectively dismissed all of my witness without
an opportunity for me to explain how they were involved with this case. During the
brief discussion that was on the record, the District Magistrate intimidated and
threatened me with court sanctions when I tried to explain how the witnesses did
have personal knowledge regarding the case. Two of the witnesses were officers of
Lancaster County and were called by me to investigate a crime, in which both
refused.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUY
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>3. At the
conclusion of the hearing the District Magistrate threatened me with offensive
language again with court sanctions for merely trying to understand why he was
violating the rules of conduct and the rules of procedure for the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>4. A few days
after the conclusion of the hearing, I entered the offices of the District Magistrate to
pay for the fines and penalties sanctioned by the court. I first, asked whether I
would have to pay before I entered my appeal to the verdict. They refused to
provide any explanation, other than you will have to get an attorney, we cannot
answer that question. I immediately paid the fines knowing that I would appeal the
case.
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>5. After receiving
the transcript for the LCCR, I found a blatant lie in the transcript. When asked
whether a witness had personal knowledge about the case, the transcript reads
NO. Now before I subpoenaed my witnesses, I reviewed the rules of procedure and
was knowledgeable of the rules for personal knowledge of a witness, and would not
have answered no to that question because they did have personal knowledge.
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>6. The District
Magistrate was intimidating me and obstructing justice by trying to deter me from
filing CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-2288 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE EASTERN
DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, which I filed on May 16, 2005. The case was filed with
a Motion to Seal on the same
day.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHIL
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>PRIVATE</AMGRO
UP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM style="FONT-
FAMILY: Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>CRIMINAL
COMPLAINT</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@
BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Docket
Number:</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUY
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>The acts
committed by the accused were: (Set forth a summary of the facts sufficient to
advise the defendant of the nature of the offense charged. Activation to the statute
allegedly violated, without more, is not sufficient. In a summary case, you must cite
the specific section and subsection of the statute ordinance allegedly
violated.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUY
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Defendant did
knowingly and willingly block plaintiffs access to the door to exit store in an attempt
to intimidate and harass, and after plaintiff tried to avoid the defendant and exit the
doorway, defendant did engage in an illegal sexual act by grabbing and squeezing
the defendants buttocks with an inappropriate gesture with the defendants finger
while squeezing. This lude act was in the strictest violation of Pennsylvania statutes
concerning sexual harassment. Witnesses were present both behind the checkout
counter and waiting in line at the checkout counter. Plaintiff requests the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to prosecute the defendant to the fullest extent of
the law. All of which were against the peace and dignity of the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania and contrary to the Act of Assembly, or in violation of and (Subsection)
(Section) of the (PA Statute). I ask that process be issued and that the defendant be
required to answer the charges I have
made.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYP
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>I verify that the
facts set forth in this complaint are true and correct to the best of my knowledge or
information and belief. This verification is made subject to the penalties of Section
4904 of the Crimes Code (18 Pa.C.S. 4904) relating to unsworn falsification to
authorities.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@B
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>June 11,
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Defendant did
knowingly and willingly block plaintiffs access to the door to exit store in an
attempt to intimidate and harass, and after plaintiff tried to avoid the defendant and
exit the doorway, defendant did engage in an illegal sexual act by grabbing and
squeezing the defendants buttocks with an inappropriate gesture with the
defendants finger while squeezing. This lude act was in the strictest violation of
Pennsylvania statutes concerning sexual harassment. Witnesses were present both
behind the check*out counter and waiting in line at the checkout counter. Plaintiff
requests the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to prosecute the defendant to the
fullest extent of the law. Verify that the facts set forth in this complaint are true and
correct to the Recent Police Reports & Status of Ongoing
Investigations</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>1. Break-In
reported on June 12, 2005: As reported to the officer, Adams? who came to take
my report, I left my home at approximately 2:30pm, with all doors locked. At
approximately 9:15pm, I entered through my garage door and found my back door
wide open. I also reported a Honda file missing, which I have since
located.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUY
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM> 2. I am
requesting the status of the complaint that I reported to Officer Berger on June 10
concerning the sexual harassment by Mr. Thomas Grassel on the same date.
.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><A
MGROUP01@MSN.COM> 3. During my visit by the officer on June 12, I again asked if
anyone in the department had questioned Mr. David Pflumm regarding access to my
home. As I have stated in just about every complaint about a break-in over the past
six months, On Thanksgiving day, 2004, Mr. David Pflumm, his son Keagan, and
daughter Lizzy, approached my home. I wanted NO personal contact with them, and
made sure my doors were closed and locked. After several minutes of knocking on
my back door, I went down to the basement hoping they would leave. They instead
went to my front door and basement door and kept knocking. I was located in the
rear of my basement, waiting for them to leave. Suddenly, Lizzy and Keagan
appeared in my basement asking why I did not answer the door. I quickly asked
them how they got into my house. First they said the door was opened, and then
they said Keagan used a credit card to open my back door. They said
Dave was upstairs in my kitchen. We walked upstairs and I quickly asked
Dave how they got into my house, he responded, We have lots of keys. Now with
all of the reports of people breaking into my house, and the fact that I first reported
the above event to Officer Berger in December with the report of my missing
remote control, I will again ask you why your department refused to question the
Pflumms regarding keys to my house?
</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM
></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM> 4. During
my interview last evening I showed the officer the letter from Mr. David Pflumm
dated June 2, 2005, which was served to me by a Pennsylvania Constable from
District Justice Leo Eckerts office at approximately 9:30 am on June 10th on Stone
Hill road in front of my mailbox. The officer said, We have a copy of that letter, and
are aware of that. I requested the officer to take the letter and my response, sent
via facsimile to Pflumm Contractors on June 10th, to you. The officer refused to take
the letter. I asked him to take my statement regarding the same, and he refused. I
asked him why he would not take my statement, if you have a copy of the complaint
from Mr. David Pflumm? He said, I am going home. I called him corrupt and said
that the whole department was corrupt. I attest to the above statements as the
truth and request a copy of all of my complaints, reports, and calls to your
department, as defined and authorized under the Freedom Of Informat
o
Act, and according to the laws governing the same by the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania and the federal rules governing the
same.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPH
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Friday, July 1,
2005 12:00 PM - 1:00 PM: Stan Caterbone files for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Protection
in the U.S. Eastern District Bankruptcy Court in Reading, PA at the Clerk of Courts,
pays fee
255.00.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYP
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>July 5, 2005 -
Advanced Media Group issues a stock certificate to Sheryl Crow for a donation to
the Scouts Trail charity fund; which was to be build in Kennett, MO beside the
Sheryl Crow Aquatic Center. The stock certificate is being held my the Kennett MO
Chamber of
Commerce.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@B
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>July 17, 2005
Posted message on the Sheryl Crow Fan
Forum</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYP
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Advanced Media
Group</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPH
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>registered:
4/19/2005
00:00</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPH
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>posts:
5</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIP
S.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM> A new
business model? This is a digital revolution. The music industry and consumers are
experiencing a conversion from physical mediums (cd's, videos, dvd's) to electronic
files stored in cyberspace and on mp3 players. Musicians and Artists are facing a
legal dilemma in light of the preceding -How to protect ownership, intellectual
property rights, and most importantly royalties from their music. Look at the
statistics. CD sales and revenues are going down. Who needs to own a CD collection
when you can pay Rhapsody $10.00 a month fora 1 million song catalogue with
digital quality, accessible 24/7? In addition, you have the capability to port any song
or albumto your mp3 player at half the cost of a CD. Convergence of mediums is
what is driving the partnership between Dell and Sheryl Crow. They are leading the
curve with this new technology for home entertainment. And it is not just about
music. Sheryl and Dell are pioneering a new approach at formulating a new
business model that helps her contemporaries meet the challenges facing the music
industry at large. The musicians continue to enjoy making more music, in light of
the fact that they have been short changed during this process. When was the last
time you saw an artist go on strike? And what perfect timing to introduce a new
album and
tour. </AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILB
OX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>I suspect it was
all by design by professionals that understand thier markets, thier consumers, and
thier respective products. Give it a chance to play out before passing
judgement.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@B
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>posted:
7/17/2005
10:09</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPH
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>September 30,
2005 Yarnell - Security system malfunction garage door not on line
<END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBO
X@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END></END><
/AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.C
OM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END>October
01, 2005 Yarnell Calls 2 times Woke and found 2 calls from Yarnell Security
<END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></
CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END><END></
END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END><END>Oc
tober 02, 2005 Yarnell Security Dispatcher said someone entered house, aborted
alarm at 9:21am and changed the Master Code. Said she would reset. Code
changed from 4115 to 2115. I told her she had a security breach. Mr. Yarnell called
me back and told me to stop calling his
office.</END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></C
MAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END><END></
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END><END>Oc
tober 04, 2005 Judge Mary McLaughlin Resubmit original complaint of 1998 affidavit
via fax
<END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.C
OM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END><END><E
ND></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.CO
M></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> October 05, 2005 AB UNITED STATES TRUSTEE'S RESPONSE TO ORDER TO
SHOW CAUSE WHY THE DEBTOR'S BANKRUPTCY CASE SHOULD NOT BE REINSTATED
On September 21, 2005, this Court entered an Order to Show Cause why, in light of
and Brief, his ...
</END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></
ND>October 05, 2005 - Comcast
Cable</END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.CO
ND>October 06, 2005 - Superior Court of California Filing Filed petitions for estate,
and cause of death.
ND>October 06, 2005- East Lampeter Police Arrest
ND>Filed with California Superior Court for Sammy's Petitions via Willow Street Post
Office. Then headed to Cingular on Lincoln Hwy East, stopped for lunch at Brasserie.
Girl jumped in front of me going in, Sheryl Crow look alike. 2 girls, noticed SU, with
convers...</END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN
.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> October 07, 2005 Paid Conestoga Police Speeding Fine From
Sunday</END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.C
OM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> October 07, 2005 District Justice Savage see 1987
<END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01
@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGRO
UP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <END>October 10, 2005 Patio Table
Smashed</END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP
01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <END>October 10, 2005 Southern Regional Police Visit Chief Fiorill responds
and takes report - said he would send assignment number for insurance.
</END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.
COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <END>October 11, 2005 AB
Order</END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@
MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <END>IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT
OF
PENNSYL.VANIA</END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMG
ROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <END>IN THE MATTER OF: STANLEYJ. CATERBONE, Report to Harleysville A.
Mazzuchi CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-3689 BKY.
NO.</END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@M
SN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <END>October 13, 2005 Cingular 4 Customer Service Reps will provide an
audit within 7 days.
ND><END>October 14, 2005 Superior Court of CA call Ann, wanted to know what
to do with docs about Sammy. Never called back. Left 2 messages.
ND><END>October 17, 2005 Harleysville Insurance Letter Still under investigation,
reason for case not closed when due.
ND><END>October 18, 2005 Sovereign Bank would not open DIP Account. Kept
giving me a hard
time.</END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@
ND><END>October 19, 2005 Hugh Ward, Dept of Justice Do not need DIP account,
and do not have to submit anymore docs for first meeting. Instructions will follow.
ND><END>October 20, 2005 forum post would not give me a private meeting. told
3 people in lobby.
<END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMG
ROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <END><END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.
COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <END><END>October 22, 2005 East Lampeter Citations Docket No. CR-408-05
OTN- L260045-2 Hearing Nov 17, 3:00pm
</END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP0
ND><END><END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.
ND><END><END>October 28, 2005 Meeting with Judge Mary McLaughlin met with
her, and at least 4 staffers
<END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM
></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <END><END><END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMG
ROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM>
 <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM style="FONT-
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>November 01, 2005 - District Justice Savage
Meeting</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM
ND><END><END><END>Requested a change of venue. DJ Williams? told me to go
to County Court House to the Court Administrator and get Change of Venue
</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AM
GROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <END><END><END>November 01, 2005 Lancaster County Court
Administrator Will change to another District Justice. Cited the Affidavit and 1987
abuse in Giest Road during arrest by MT Police, Horton and Reese.
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>November 04, 2005 called Hugh Ward about
appointment Submittals before meeting. Resend original submittals. 48 hour notice
to reschedule. was not in, left message to call if we needed to meet, told him by
back was bad and not able to drive, reschedule for mon or
tue.</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></
AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <END><END><END>November 05, 2005 Called Mastropietro and Dr Pool
called for appt - both said to go to emergency room
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>November 06, 2005 Lancaster Regional Hospital
Emergency Room too much pain. Went for pain pills. Did not help
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>November 14, 2005 Lancaster County Criminal
Prothonotary Office 2 documents were not served including the notice for hearing
and the notice regarding appeal decision. Clerks were not very helpful, and kept
giving excuses as to why I never received any notices. Always quick to take my
mone for the 2
copies.</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>November 17, 2005 656-2191District Judge Ron Savage
Court
Hearing</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>November 21, 2005 Creditors Meeting Courtroom
1</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></A
MGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <END><END><END>November 22, 2005 Joss Package per Feb
05</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></A
FAMILY:
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>November 29, 2005 Chapter 11 fees Paid fee schedule.
Clerk provide details for Dec 15 creditors meeting, along with mandatory
requirements. Addendums and supplemental to schedules for creditors.
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>November 30, 2005 Charlie Smithgall visited with Dee,
she explained the proposal for the Lancaster Press Building and we discussed the
skyline debate and project.
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>December 01, 2005 Reading Court
Hearing</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>December 02, 2005 East Lampeter Addendum for
Hearing East Lampeter Citation Addendum to
notes:</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>1. After walking outside I tried to give my credit card to
the officer to pay for my bar tab, officer refused to take the credit card so I threw
the credit card on the ground. I told the officer that the
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>Charges withdrawn - May or may not be reissued by
Judge Ruetter. What a crazy discussion and hearing. Judge gave me the finger in the
end while pointing to PA on a piece of paper. I'll save the specifics and details for
myself on this
one.</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><
/AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <END><END><END>December 06, 2005 eBay account hacked 23 Ipods
listed from my store from Beijing China
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>December 06, 2005 IFCC FBI I05120608348825 IFCC
internet fraud account
05120608348825</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>December 07, 2005 - Dr. Black request for records
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>December 08, 2005 - IFCC FBI I05120804514805
I05120804514805 You are about to submit a complaint with the IFCC. Please review
your information prior to
submission.</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>December 12, 2005 - CD/DVD Writer Hacking tried to
restore system configuration - did not work tried to install new cd/dvd writer - did
not work said to reinstall operating system and reinstall all software was able to
write to 3 cd on Iomega drive before it was hacked early am; Comcast Cable again
disconnected service and internet
service.</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>December 14, 2005 Letter of Denial from the
Pennsylvania Housing Finance
Agency:</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM
ND><END><END><END>Pennsylvania Homeowners'
Emergency</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.C
OM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <END><END><END>Housing Finance Agency Mortgage Assistance Loan
Program</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.CO
M></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <END><END><END>Pavements: 211 North Front Sheet, P.O. Box
15206</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>
ND><END><END><END>Harrisburg, PA 17105-
ND><END><END><END>Correspondence: 211 North Front Street, P.O. Box
ND><END><END><END>Harrisburg, PA 171 05-
ND><END><END><END>(717) 780-3940 1-800-342-2397 fax(717) 780-
ND><END><END><END>ITY (717) 780-
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>STAN J
CATERBONE</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.
ND><END><END><END>220 STONE HILL
ROAD</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>
ND><END><END><END>CONESTOGA, PA.
ND><END><END><END>S.S. #: 200-46-
FAMILY:
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>Your application for a HOMEOWNERS' EMERGENCY
MORTGAGE ASSISTANCE LOAN has been DENIED pursuant to Act 91 of 1983,35 P.S.
Section 1680,401-C et seq. and/o-r Agency Guidelines 12 PA Code Sect~on3 1.201
et seq. for the following
reasons:</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.CO
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>1. No reasonable prospect of applicant resuming full
mortgage payments within twenty-four (24) months and paying mortgage(s) by
maturity based on: Applicant's income has been insufficient to maintain mortgage
for the past two (2) years. Total monthly expenses: $3268. 2002 net monthly
income: loss, 2003: 0,2004:
extension.</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.C
ND><END><END><END> 2. No reasonable prospect of applicant resuming
full mortgage payments within twenty-four (24) months and paying mortgage@) by
maturity based on: Applicant is financially overextended based upon income
history.</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM
ND><END><END><END> 3. Property securing mortgage is not a one-or-two
family owner occupied residence based on: The secured property is used primarily
for commercial or business purposes. Per applicant, ~ ~ 65% of secured property is
used for
business.</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.CO
ND><END><END><END> 4. Applicant is not suffering financial hardship due
to circumstances beyond applicant's control based on: Applicant has asset(s) which
could have been liquidated to cure delinquency Per applicant, has stocks and/lor
bonds in business valued at $4 million.
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>You may be entitled to an appeal hearing if you disagree
with our decision. Requests for a hearing must be made in writing and must be
submitted to the Agency within 15 days after the postmark date of this letter. Verbal
requests are not acceptable. The hearing may be conducted by telephone
conference call therefore you must include your telephone number. You also have a
right to an in-person hearing at the Agency's office in Harrisburg if you so desire.
Requests for hearings must state the reason(s) that a hearing is requested and must
be sent first class, registered or certified mail to: Chief Counsel - HEMAP Hearing
Request, PHFAIHEMAP, 21 1 North Front Street, P.O. Box 15628, Harrisburg, PA,
17105-
5628.</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>
ND><END><END><END>The hearing request may also be faxed to the attention
of Chief Counsel - Hearing Request at 717-780-4031. The Agency will attempt to
schedule the hearing within thirty (30) days after the request is received. When
sending your appeal, please be sure to print or type your name legibly and include
your social security number and phone number where you may be reached during
the day. You have a right to be represented by an attorney in connection with your
appeal. If you cannot afford an attorney you may be eligible for Legal Services
representation. You can contact a Legal Services representative toll free at 1-800-
322-7572 for a referral to the office for your county. Please be aware that scheduling
an appeal hearing does not necessarily stay foreclosure
proceedings.</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN
.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <END><END><END>DISCLOSURE OF USE OF INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM
OUTSIDE
SOURCE:</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.CO
ND><END><END><END>1. Disclosure inapplicable. The Federal Equal Credit
opportunity Act prohibits creditors from discriminating against credit applicants on
the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, age (provided
that the applicant has the capacity to enter into a binding contract); because all or
part of the applicant's income derives from any public assistance program; or
because the applicant has in good faith exercised any right under the Consumer
Credit Protection Act. The Federal Agency that administers compliance with this law
concerning this creditor is the Federal Trade Commission, Equal Credit Opportunity,
Washington,
D.C.</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>Sincerely,</END></END></END></END></END></EN
D></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILL
IPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM
style="FONT-FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>THE PENNSYLVANIA HOUSING FINANCE
AGENCY</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.CO
ND><END><END><END>HPREJECT</END></END></END></END></END></EN
style="FONT-FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>Rev. September
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>December 15, 2005 - Meeting of Creditors Reading
Courtroom 1 3rd Floor610-320-5255 341 Meeting with Mr. Ward of Department of
Justice, No Creditors attended. Routine meeting to clarify under oath schedules
submitted. Said to submit all filings to Reading Courts and would only hear from DOJ
if anything additional is needed. Asked
when...</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>December 17, 2005 - Judge McLaughlin Hearing Request
ND><END><END><END>Stanley J. Caterbone (pro
se)</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></
ND><END><END><END>220 Stone Hill
Road</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>
ND><END><END><END>Conestoga, PA
ND><END><END><END>Honorable Judge Mary A.
McLaughlin</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.C
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>December 28, 2005 - Cyber warehouse Restore System
$50 to restore to factory settings $45 wireless pci card for old HP Laptop
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>December 31, 2005 - Depart for Los Cabos SouthWest Fl
to Houston 7:20am charged me an extra $25 for luggage that they ended up loosing
later in the day in Houston.
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>January 01, 2006 - Continental Airlines Could not talk to
anyone about problem finally at about 8:30 talked to Continental at ticket counter,
no flights, all booked until Wednesday. Put me on standby for other flights that day,
but said probably would not get on a flight. Kept arguing about problem with several
ticket agents,
very</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>January 03, 2006 Finally got a flight out to Houston
again, abuse and intimidation by Continental employees, not happy about me
getting a flight. Had to pay additional charge of $100 for ticket.
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>January 05, 2006 - Letter to Editor Drew Anthon Civility,
professional etiquette, and the public discourse for the Lancaster Convention Center
debate. Tonight at the meeting at Farm and Home, I had approached Mr. Drew
Anthon and politely asked him to discuss and settle my civil complaint. This was
th...</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>January 05, 2006 - Complaint number:
I06010506177009Password: luggage On January 30 I had planned to visit Los
Cabos, Mexico, for a business trip. I had used the Internet to locate the airport (PTO)
for that destination to locate and book the necessary travel accommodations. PVR
(Puerto Vallarta, Mexico) appeared on
sev...</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>January 05, 2006 - Judge Mary McLaughlin, J Order to
Serve Notice is received
GROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.
COM style="FONT-FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ND><END><END><END>STANLEY J. CATERBONE v. LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON,
ET EL NO. 05-2288 ORDER CIVIL
ND><END><END><END>ACTION</END></END></END></END></END></END
></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLI
style="FONT-FAMILY:
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>January 05, 2006 Federal Bureau of Investigation
Internet Crime Unit Complaint number: I06010506177009 FBI IFCC Complaint via
letter
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>January 06, 2006 Complaint number: I06010506177009
USPS
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>January 06, 2006 Complaint number: I06010506177009
via USPS
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>January 09, 2006 Judge Twardowski Order of Creditors
610-320-5255 phone Ext 248 Kathy, Twardowski Clerk Ext 243
Twardowski</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.C
ND><END><END><END>January 12, 2006 Honda
Inspection</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.C
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>January 12, 2006 Received Judge Mary McLaughlin Serve
Order of Jan 5
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>January 13, 2006 Lancaster County Redevelopment
Authority Meeting with Randy Patterson - Discussed Concerts, said Joe probably
does not have any, was not interested in getting involved, said not his
responsibility, Barnstormers manage facility and their option. Said we keep going
around in circles.
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>January 13, 2006 - Stanley J. Caterbone (pro se)
ND><END><END><END>220 Stone Hill Road
ND><END><END><END>the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (010...
ND><END><END><END>610-320-5255 phone
ND><END><END><END>Ext 248 Kathy, Twardowski Clerk Ext 243 Twardowski
ND><END><END><END>UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT
OF PENNSYLVANIA
ND><END><END><END>In Re: Stanley J. Caterbone Debtor Case No: 05-23059-
tmtChapter: 11
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>January 17, 2006 FBI Field Office in Harrisburg; Called
about computer hacking and
intruders</END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.CO
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>January 18, 2006 PA Housing Finance Hearing 780-3937
780-4031fax
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END>January 18, 2006 Notice of Service To Fed Civil Actions
Mailed all complaints and Judge Mclaughlin's Notice of Service Package, with the
exception of Southern Regional Police Department
<END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@M
SN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <END><END><END><END></END></END></END></END></END></END
></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BU
ND><END><END><END><END>January 19, 2006 Joe Pinto Village Clair Bros
Email Stan- Thanks for your help on this!!
Joe</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.C
ND><END><END><END><END>Delivery Confirmation Label Number: 0103
8555 7495 2644 2732 Judge Thomas M. Twardowski,
Unite...</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@M
ND><END><END><END><END>Filed Drew Anthon Default Notice and it was
stamped in the Prothonotary office at 3:00pm by
Audrey</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@M
ND><END><END><END><END>January 20, 2006 Served Drew Anthon Default
Notice Served Default Notice to Diane McMahon, the Secretary in the Marketing
Office of the Eden Resort Inn. She said Drew was out of the office, so she gave the
notice to Drew's Secretary while I was there. I went to have 1 drink at the Lounge
Bar at the
Eden...</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@M
Verdana"><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.CO
>
END><END><END><END><END><END><END>January 20, 2006 Meeting with
Joe Pinto & Slide at Snow
Magic</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MS
N.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <END><END><END><END>January 21, 2006 Yarnell Security Sys Letter
YARNELL SECURITY SYSTEMS
</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.CO
M></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><CMAILBOX@BUY
PHILLIPS.COM style="FONT-FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END><END>131 ELMWOOD RD . LANCASTER PA 17602.717-
399-3900 January 20,2006
ND><END><END><END><END>PA 175 18Dear Mr. Caterbone, We
ND><END><END><END><END>Turns to a bitchy nagging wife.
<END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGRO
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END><END><END></END></END></END></END></END>
ND><END><END><END><END><END>January 23, 2006 US Dept of Justice Hugh
Ward letter U.S. Department of Justice Office of the United States Trustee Eastern
District of Pennsylvania 833 Chestnut Street(215) 597-4411 Suite 500 fax (215)
597-5795 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVLL ACTION - LAW PROJECT
HOPE/ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP 220 Stone Hill
Road</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP
CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM style="FONT-
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END><END><END>DRREESWOR ATN RESORT INN AND
CONF...</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGRO
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END><END><END>Richard S. Solove, Esquire McNEES
WALLACE & NURICK
LLC</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP0
ND><END><END><END><END><END>180 Good
Drive</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP
ND><END><END><END><END><END>Lancaster, PA 17603 (717) 291-1177
Attorney I.D. #I7717 Attorney for
Defendants</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AM
GROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM
> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM style="FONT-
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END><END><END>PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL
ACTIO...</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGRO
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END><END><END>Barley Snyder, LLC, Attorneys at
Law</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP0
ND><END><END><END><END><END>126 East King
Street</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROU
P01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <END><END><END><END><END>Lancaster, PA 17602-
2893</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP
ND><END><END><END><END><END>28th Jan Auditorium Theater Chicago - On
Sale Dec
10</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01
@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <END><END><END><END><END>Sale Dec 10
<END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></
AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.C
style="FONT-FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END></END></END></END></END>
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END>610-320-5255 phone Ext 248
Kathy, Twardowski Clerk Ext 243
Twardowski</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END
style="FONT-FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END>UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY
COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF
PENNSYLVANIA</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></
END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPH
style="FONT-FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END>February 01, 2006 ANSWER TO
FULTON BANK REQUEST FOR RELIEF FROM AUTOMATIC STAY Local Bankruptcy Form
9014-3 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
style="FONT-FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END>IN RE
:</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGR
OUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM style="FONT-
FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END>February 02, 2006 Judge
Twardowski Feb 2 Order UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT 01:
style="FONT-FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END>In Re: Stanley J.
Caterbone</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END
style="FONT-FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END>February 03, 2006 Reminder to
Artists or AMG/Interscope Send artists of label welcome letter
style="FONT-FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><END></END></END></END><
/END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><END>February 03, 2006 Rcvd
LC KEGEL KELIN ALMY & GRlMM response to Fed Civil
Action</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></E
ND></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHI
style="FONT-FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><END>Advanced Media
Group</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></E
style="FONT-FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><END>220 Stone Hill
Road</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></EN
style="FONT-FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><END>Conestoga, PA
17516</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></E
style="FONT-FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><END>24 North Lime Street
Lancaster,
PA...</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></EN
style="FONT-FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><END></END></END></END><
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><END>Woke up and found Ipod
and Ring Missing. Ipod was crashed and charging in van.
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END></END></END></
END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROU
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END>February 05, 2006
Conestoga Police Speeding
Ticket</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></E
ND></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@
Ipod
Found.</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></
Donegal Policy Due
$159</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></E
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END>PAE 3015468
faxed to 426-7031
END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></C
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END></END></
END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></E
style="FONT-FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END>February
06, 2006 Manheim Township Police Order to Dismiss Federal cv05-0288 to Judge
McLaughlin</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END
></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>
</CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END>2005 to
the Court requesting permission to amend his
"comp</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></E
ND></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CM
AILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END>This Court
by Order dated January 5,2006, directed Plaintiff to serve his summons and
</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END><
/END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX
style="FONT-FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END>IN THE
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL
DIVISION</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END>
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END>PROJECT
HOPE ADVANCED MEDIA
GROUP</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END>220 Stone
Hill
D></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAI
LBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END>Motion Due
Case No. CI-05-03644DREW ANTHON If you do not want the court to grant the relief
sought in the motion or if you want the court to consider your views on the motion,
then on or before February 8, 2006 you or your attorney must do & of the
following:</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END>
style="FONT-FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END>McLaughlin
Order for Extension of
Time</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></EN
style="FONT-FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END>PHILADELP
HIA ATLANTA CHARLOTTE CHERRY HILL CHICAGO DALLAS DENVER
HOUSTON</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END>
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END>LA5 VEGAS
LONDON NEW YORK NEWARK SAN DIEGO SAN FQANCISCO SEATTLE
TRENTON</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END>
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END>WASHINGT
ON, DC WEST CONSHOHOCKEN WICHITA WIIMINGTON LOS ANGELES
A</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END>
</END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILB
OX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END>United
States District Court Eastern District of
Pennsylvania</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></EN
D></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM
style="FONT-FAMILY:
10, 2006 Drew Anthon Motion
Due</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></EN
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END>Richard S.
Solove, Esquire McNEES WALLACE & NURICK
LLC</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></EN
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END>180 Good
Drive Lancaster, PA 17603 (717) 291-1177 Attorney I.D. #I7717 Attorney for
Defendants PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL
ACTIO...</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END><
/END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></C
style="FONT-FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END>Took back
digital box for replacement, gave colored woman bankruptcy papers for her
superior,
was</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></EN
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END>again
going to turn off cable.
style="FONT-FAMILY:
10, 2006 Drew Anthon Notice of Items Feb. 10 2006 IN THE COURT OF COMMON
PLEAS LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL
DIVISION</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END>
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END>PROJECT
HOPE ADVANCED MEDIA
GROUP</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END>220 Stone
Hill
LLIPS.COM></DIV><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM
style="FONT-FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END> </EN
D></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END
YPHILLIPS.COM>
<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify"><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM
style="FONT-FAMILY:
12, 2006 Joe Roda & Diane Nast email Feb. 12 2006 Dear Joe and Diane: These
are the documents I currently have filed in Federal courts. I just saw you were back
to work, so I thought I should share these with you. Please understand that the
quotation of my statement
style="FONT-FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END>Re: Do you
know my cousin, Diane Nast?
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END>To:
<AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET>Date:...</AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END
></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END>
</END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUY
style="FONT-FAMILY:
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><AMGAUC
TIONS@COMCAST.NET></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END>
</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGRO
FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET>Again went to Comcast after digital service was again shutt
off. Again, another useless phone call to customer service. Told them that Mable of
the Legal dept processed bankruptcy order. After about 20 minutes, said service
was restored.
</AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></END></END
></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></A
FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET>February 15, 2006 Letter to the PA Housing Finance
Agency;</AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></END
></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.C
TIONS@COMCAST.NET>Advanced Media
Group</AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></END><
TIONS@COMCAST.NET>220 Stone Hill
Road</AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></END></
END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>
TIONS@COMCAST.NET>Conestoga, PA
17516</AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></END><
FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET>S.S. #: 200-46-
6095</AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></END></
FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET>Chief Counsel - HEMAP Hearing
Request,</AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></END
TIONS@COMCAST.NET>PHFAIHEMAP,</AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></E
ND></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></EN
style="FONT-FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET>21 1 North Front
Street,</AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></END>
TIONS@COMCAST.NET>P.O. Box
15628,</AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></END>
TIONS@COMCAST.NET>Harrisburg, PA, 17105-
TIONS@COMCAST.NET>Facsimile: 717-780-
FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET>February 16,
FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET>Re: NOTICE OF DECISION OF HEARING
EXAMINER</AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></EN
D></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.
TIONS@COMCAST.NET>For the record, I did not provide the statements in the report
as you have determined. I protest the accuracy of the statements that were
reported in the Decision, and formally request a copy of the tape recording. I also
have determined there are several inaccuracies concerning the facts that were
established. Given that you a Federally funded program, what courts would have
jurisdiction in any appeals that may follow?
FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET>February 21, 2006 Fulton Hearing in Reading 1. If you do not
want the court to grant the relief sought in the motion or if you want the court to
consider your views on the motion, then on or before February 8, 2006 you or your
attorney must do & of the following:Judge Twardowski Feb 2
Order</AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></END></
FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET>February 22, 2006 Visit Comcast to confirm
appt.</AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></END></
FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET>February 22, 2006 - Lancaster County Commissioners
Meeting Art Morris, and Planning Commission. Walked out after hearing they
awarded the consultants bid 1 week before RFP was due.
FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET>February 22, 2006 Suburban Cable Appt Cable modem
turned on before Comcast tech even entered my office, how could that happen?
Blue light on Vonage modem was lit for first time since Friday, the week before.
FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET>February 23, 2006 Letter from Lynn Stoy of the PA Housing
Agency denying my request for a transcript of the Hearing in
January.</AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></END>
FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET>February 24, 2006 Received Leo Eckert summons from
Conestoga
Police</AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></END><
TIONS@COMCAST.NET>COUNTY OF:
FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET>March 01, 2006 Lancaster County Commissioners
Meeting</AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></END>
FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET>March 01, 2006 Lancaster County District Attorney Office
Drop off letter to Donald Attorney
<END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END>
</END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END>
/END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYP
style="FONT-FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END>March 01, 2006 Lancaster Chamber of Commerce
Request 2006 fee schedule for Project Hope and Advanced Media Group. See Sharon
Roda, who works for the Economic Development and David Nikollof. Did not know
she worked there and
asked</END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END><
/END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MS
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END>to visit with her.
</END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></END
style="FONT-FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END>March 01, 2006 Visit Joe Pinto at Clipper Stadium
Stopped by to see Joe about the concert schedule for the summer. Joe was busy.
style="FONT-FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END>March 02, 2006 Phone call from Attorney JoLynn Stoy
of PHFA Another argument about getting the recording of my Appeal Hearing on Jan
18th in Harrisburg. She again tried to lie her way out of the fact that they fabricated
my statement in their finding. Hung
up</END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></EN
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END>on her.
<END></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END>
FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAS
T.NET></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>March 02, 2006 Mail Certified letter to JoLynn
Stoy</END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></E
ND></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>March 04, 2006
Interrogation</END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></
END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></A
MGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.CO
M> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM
style="FONT-FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>March 05, 2006
NSA</END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></E
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>March 07, 2006 Hypnosis Seminar Talk to
someone and they said smoking would be over at 8pm and the diet would start at
8pm and end at 10. $59. fee to attend. The went to Dispensing com and had 2
beers, then to Alley Kat had 3 drinks and 3 cokes until 1:15am, then went home.
Went back ...March 08,
2006</END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>Desk Sergeant and tall shorthaired officer
carrying black gym bag were at front desk. Laid my business card on desk and
asked if "they knew what chlorphorme was, and that I heard rumors around town
that someone was using that stuff, and they should
clean...</END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END>
FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>March 21, 2006 Someone just shot at me At
approx 6:30 am this morning I was out by the side of my house in the woods tying
up a tree and someone from the adjacent valley shot one shot which sounded like it
was it could have been at me. There were no hunters in the area that I could see.
Their...</END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END>
FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>March 21, 2006 EXCELSIOR PLACE INVESTOR
Excelsior to get new investor Partner to be revealed today for E. King project BY
PAULA HOLZMAN, Intelligencer Journal Staff Today's city Redevelopment Authority
meeting could break the deadlock on plans to renovate several
</END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END
></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>March 22, 2006 Facsimile to Lin Patch,
Appeals Officer of the Pennsylvania Housing Finance
Agency</END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END>
FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>Fax Cover
Sheet</END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END><
/END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROU
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>To: Lin Patch, Appeals
Officer</END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END>
FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>Hemap Appeals
Unit</END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></E
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>Company: Pennsylvania Housing Finance
Agency</END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END>
FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>Fax
Number:</END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END
></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGR
FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>From: Stan
Caterbone</END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></EN
D></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AM
FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>Date: March 22, 2006
2:58pm</END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END>
FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>Re: Appeal to Commonwealth
Courts</END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END>
FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>I have received the tape recording of my
appeal hearing on March 15, 2006, and upon further review, the following statement
was not found on the recording of my hearing: The applicant provided the following
statement with respect to the cause of the mortgage delinquency: "These
circumstances came about when I met with officials from International Signal &
Control, plc., in 1987 and became involved with agencies providing the United
States of America associated with the highest level of Intelligence and National
Security. I was called upon by ISC to help to provide financial assistance for portions
of their [sic] operations. I immediately became suspect of these circumstances
following my meeting of June 23, 1987; and alerted various officials of local, state,
and federal authorities. It was these allegations that resulted in a 'Billion Dollar
Fraud' that was successfully prosecuted by the United State Attorney General and
the Federal Bureau [sic] of Investigation in 1990. Thiese circumstances have been
before now, a dire problem within the scope and bounds of our National Security.
These circumstances are now able to be adjucated within the Court of Law under
the provisions and doctrines of the Constitution of the United States of America.
During these activities, certain agencies of the intelligence community began
extracting information on present and future issues concerning the current state of
affairs of the United States of America." I also have learned that Mr. Cooper in the
hearing stated that an appeal to the Commonwealth Courts time expired after 30
days, or 6 days after you provided me with the recorded
@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><CMAIL
BOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM style="FONT-FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>transcript, which I initially requested on or
about February 10, 2006. Was it your intention to delay the delivery of the tape
recording so that the time for filing my appeal would have expired?
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>March 25, 2006 Key to Honda Stolen Mom's
House and Billy Plank Found beer can in back yard, and newspapers in kitchen.
Noticed people may have been inside house. While there, white small car pulled up
in back beside Billy Planks truck, got out and crawled under truck. Was a clue about
the key under my van that
was...</END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END><
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>March 25, 2006 Went home to get key for
Safety Deposit Box March 25, 2006 Hypnotized (Key) Fulton Bank Safety Deposit
Box Hypnotized with the Key Trick, Alarm went off on car, don't know how, younger
woman beside my car, lipstick. Lost key to ignition, got out of car, stood beside car,
went back into car and key was gone. Went to get key under car, and it was gone.
Wanted...</END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END
FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>March 25, 2006 Hypnotized (Key) Fulton
Bank Safety Deposit Box Hypnotized with the Key Trick, Alarm went off on car, don't
know how, younger woman beside my car, lipstick. Lost key to ignition, got out of
car, stood beside car, went back into car and key was gone. Went to get key under
car, and it was gone.
Wanted...</END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END
FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>March 25, 2006 Gib Armstrong
Office</END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END><
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>Pick up Right to Know and Freedom of
Information Act documents.
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>March 28, 2006 Received Judge Fehling
Order for Hearing UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT
OF
PENNSYLVANIA</END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END>
style="FONT-FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>April 02, 2006 Someone Enters 220 Stone
Hill Road Ran out of house after someone hiding in
basement</END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></EN
D></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AM
FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>April 02, 2006 Registration Stolen from
Dodge
Pickup</END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END>
FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>April 03, 2006 Person breaks into 220 Stone
Hill Road Leave driveway and with pickup go to Wagon Wheel for coffee and
newspaper, group of Men laughing at me. I ask them if anyone of them was in my
house, stay out of house until 1:30pm.
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>April 03, 2006 Chorophormed released in
Car</END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></E
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>April 04, 2006 Southern Regional Police Keep
Pounding At Door Said they just wanted to talk, Fedor and Chief Fiorell Security took
picture. Said I was sick and wanted to help me.
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>April 04, 2006 Phil Called From Austin Texas
Said Lance was out of town this week.
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>April 04, 2006 Fax Southern Regional Police
Suit to Don Totaro, Lancaster County District Attorney COMMONWEALTH OF
PENNSYLVANIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS LANCASTER COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION
Stanley J. Caterbone County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania
:</END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>April 05, 2006 Officer Buser/Lancaster
General Hospital/Millersville Police/East Lampeter
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>April 07, 2006 Conestoga Speeding Tickets
& Inspection Hearing This court has received your plea of NOT GUILTY to the
above summary violation(s). The sum of $ 112.50 has been accepted as collateral
for your appearance at trial. Your trial has been scheduled as follows: PLEASE TAKE
NOTE WHERE BEARING WILL
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>April 08, 2006 - . Hospital Missing Mail Civil
Action Complaint given to Staff to mail at 1:00am missing, rest of mail shown to me
and was never mailed.
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>April 10, 2006 Dr. Pressley 2nd Opinion Dr.
Bill Met with Dr. Bill, would not answer question regarding verifying 302 Order.
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>April 11, 2006 Judge Anita Brody Appeal to
Fulton Bank Stay
Entered</END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END>
FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>April 11, 2006 Judge McLaughlin Order for
Continuance to May 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN
DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Stanley J. Caterbone CIVIL ACTION
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>April 12, 2006 Sent Transcript to Judicial
Conduct Review Board COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA JUDICIAL CONDUCT
BOARD PENNSYLVANIPAL PLACE 301 CHESTNUT STREET SUITE
403.</END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></E
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>April 13, 2006 17101 717-234- 7911March
27,2006Stanley Caterbone220
...</END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></EN
D></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>April 14, 2006 34 Foot Admiral Holiday
Rambler Test Drove 30 foot
<END></END></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END>
style="FONT-FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END></END></END></END></AMGAUCT
IONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></E
ND></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END>April 14, 2006 The Sharks Live
Walked in and wanted to pay for ticket, said wanted to see Gus and walked into
Village. Dave and Heather, Ken Ray & Carol, Den Lilly, Kratzert, Suzanne
Porter, Brett, Fred, Billy T. Joe
Klaus,</END></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END><
/END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></
style="FONT-FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END>April 16, 2006 George at Village
Would not let me back in. Said about ticket, and he would not let me pay him for the
ticket.
</END></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END
FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END>April 17, 2006 Cable Disconnected
Paid Comcast at Office All Cable disconnected at telephone pole. Sov Bank Project
Hope Check #129 Susan Gibson would not turn cable and internet on. Said I had to
pay $990.42
<END></END></END></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END>
style="FONT-FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END><END></END></END></END></EN
D></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></END></E
ND></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END><END>April 18, 2006 Comcast Suit
Fax to Anita Brody Re: Civil Action 05-2288 The 5 page fax you sent through
eFax.com to 12155802356 was successfully transmitted at 2006-04-19 00:28:29
(GMT). receiving machine's fax ID:
.____________...</END></END></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET><
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END><END>April 18, 2006 Millersville
Boro Police Report 872-4657 Patrolman Michael K. Schaeffer, who took report on
gave me incident no. 2006-MU-00509 Phone 717-872-4657 Fax 717-872-4705 10
Colonial Avenue
</END></END></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END
style="FONT-FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END><END>COMMONWEALTH OF
PENNSYLVANIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS LANCASTER COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION
Stanley J. Caterbone Applied for Food Stamps
style="FONT-FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END><END>April 18, 2006 Pham
Computers</END></END></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></EN
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END><END>Said could not order Avaratec
Power cord, said it might be internal power supply.
style="FONT-FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END><END>April 18, 2006 Priority Mail
Wcrow & Daile High Priority mail transaction No. 72 USPS 414408-9550
Advanced Media Group 220 Stone Hill Road Email April 17, 2006Mr. Dale High High
IndustriesFrom : Advanced Media Group
<AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END></END></
END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></END><
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END><END><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>S
ent : Wednesday, April 19, 2006 4:58 AM To :
<COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP
01@MSN.COM></END></END></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET>
@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM style="FONT-FAMILY:
TIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END><END><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>See Federal Civil Action No. 05-2288... Walked in
to get a copy of Littering Citation, (Rick) Desk Officer began yelling at me and told
me that I was driving while drinking, even though my car was parked. Officer asked
for my key after he followed me out to my car, gave me a parking ticket
fo...</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END
></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></EN
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP0
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>April 22, 2006 Drove to get a paper. Took a shower
at Mom's house to go back to Lancaster City Police Station for my Key and license.
</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END></
END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END><
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>April 22, 2006 Lancaster City Police Station Went
in to get license and key and Desk Officer (woman) kept yelling at me and gave my
key back and said I would have to come back tonight to get my license back. Told
me to get out of station and never to come back again!
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>April 22, 2006 Lancaster County Library Update
calendar and email. Tried to lock me out of system.
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>April 24, 2006 LiHeap Application No More
walking, told to come back tomorrow Lois Gascho on vacation out all week.
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>April 25, 2006 LiHeap Application $600 from
LiHeap, Bankruptcy papers faxed to PP&L; Docket Judge Anita Brody Order of
Oct 5 PP&L to turn on Electric on Wed
am</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END>
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>April 25, 2006 Reading Court Hearing Parking
Meter</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></EN
D></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></E
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>April 25, 2006 Reading Court Hearing Parking
Meter</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></EN
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>April 25, 2006 Lancaster County Library Got MSN
Alert for Reading Parking Ticket Hearing, called District Justice in Reading
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>April 25, 2006 FBI Internet Crime Unit Reported
calendar hacked and alert for Reading Parking Ticket and Alert
changed.</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></
END></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END><
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>April 26, 2006 Judge Anita Brody Appeal
Due</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>April 26, 2006 Judge Anita Brody Appeal
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>April 26, 2006 Freemont Street Went
home</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></EN
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>April 26, 2006 Lancaster County Assistance Food
Stamps Said denied last year because of resources (5,000 in bank, credit card
liability) Said denied last year because failed to show to interview. Would not tell me
how long to get food
stamps</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></E
ND></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>April 27, 2006 District Justice Ballentine Caterbone
v.
Comcast</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>April 28, 2006 Amended LGH & Southern
Regional Police Department COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COURT OF
COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF LANCASTER CIVIL DIVISION Stanley J. Caterbone
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF
LANCASTER CIVIL DIVISION Stanley J. Caterbone to Lancaster General Hospital CIVIL
COMPLAINT CI-06-03349 Emily at information desk, called to corporate, would not
give me directions to department, served 2 copies to LGH and Dr. Pressley
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>April 28, 2006 Service to William Campbell of
Southern Regional Police Left copy inside door. See
pictures.</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>April 28, 2006 Barnstormers Opening
Game</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></EN
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>April 29, 2006 Tommy's Anniversary Planted our
garden.
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>May 01, 2006 Totaro's Office, Lancaster County DA
Office Requested meeting, told to write letter. Obstruction of Justice Southern
Regional Police Shellenberger
@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> May 01, 2006 Lancaster County Commissioners
Office Copy of Letter to Henderson, tried to make appointment, staff said will not
see me for
meeting.</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>May 02, 2006 Millersville Boro Police Incident
Report Now, said cannot have incident
report.</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></E
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>April 21, 2006
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>Advanced Media Group Stanley J.
Caterbone</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END>
FAMILY:
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>220 Stone Hill Road Conestoga, PA
17516Millersville Borough Police Department Michael
K...</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END>
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>May 02, 2006 Lance Look alike peddling on near
Penn Manor Middle
School</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></E
@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> 
size=2><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01
@MSN.COM><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><
END><END><END><AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END><END
><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>May 02, 2006
Danny Hershey Talked to Danny for awhile; Gun Shop; told me about DA Detective
M. Landis being a "problem and a lunatic", kept telling me about him, said he lived
near Dave on Slackwater Road, asked if I was having a problem with Dave, and said
he was a problem,
aske...</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></EN
><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.
COM><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><
END><END><AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END><END><AM
GROUP01@MSN.COM><COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></COMMENTS@WHITEHO
USE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END></END></END></AMGAUC
TIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></
END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01
@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.CO
M><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END><END><END><
END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><AMGAUCTIONS
@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END><END><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><COMM
ENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>May 03, 2006 Talked to Chief Rochet via phone of
Millersville Boro Police requested incident Re... Told me to call Sue Moyer of the
Lancaster County DA office, would not give incident report FAX COVER SHEET TO
COMPANY FAX NUMBER FROM DATE RE COVER MESSAGE +1-7172953693 Stan
Caterbone Ma5y/ 0033/,0 260 90:628 DATE RE COVER MESSAGE +1-7172934470
Stan I think it is the judicial branch of government, not the executive; but thanks for
the information anyway. I will handle the problem we discussed today in another
manner. As I stated, I will not put myself in harms way by going near Officer Buser
of So... May 04, 2006 Civil Complaint Pam Pflumm AOPC 308A-05 COMMONWEALTH
OF PENNSYLVANIA
N.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><CMAILBOX
@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END
><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END
><AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END><END><AMGROUP01@
MSN.COM><COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>COUNTY OF: Lancaster CIVIL
COMPLAINT Magisterial District Number: Ma0y2 0-24-,0 AOPC 411A-05 1-2
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNTY OF:Lancaster Magisterial District
Number : FAX COVER SHEET TO COMPANY FAX NUMBER FROM DATE RE COVER
MESSAGE +1-5738889802 Stan
Caterbone</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END>
BR></DIV><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM style="FONT-
FAMILY:
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV> 5/04/06 4:03 AM could you please confirm
the
where...</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></E
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>2006 Business Law Seminar:
Lancaster</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END><
/END></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END>
FAMILY:
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>May 08, 2006 Richard Plum phone call Harleysville
Insurance Company Said he would overnight new affidavit, argued about why no
one alerted about deficiencies
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>May 10, 2006 Fulton Bank Commercial Loan
Application Branch Manager refused to provide application or any
documentation</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></E
ND></END></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></
style="FONT-FAMILY:
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>May 10, 2006 Fulton Bank Commercial Loan
Application Bill Dougherty, Branch Manager on 1st floor; would not provide me with
an application. Process was to provide financial statements; kept requested
documentation as to application and process, refused. Said did not mail it, would go
out today, again lied.
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>May 11, 2006 Went to U.S. Postal Station on
Harrisburg Pike, Lancaster, man came up to me Capt Palmer? Said he was Dick
Shellenberger brother-in-law, wanted to talk to me, kept backing me up while trying
to weigh envelopes, told him to get away, I was busy, walked outside and waited,
told him I was busy and walked
away.</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></E
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>May 15, 2006 Availability Staffing Went to talk to
Tony Spinello, would not meet, met with Amber.
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>May 16, 2006 Judge Brody Brief
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>May 17, 2006 FBI Harrisburg Office Obstruction of
Justice Complaint Travel to Washington DC
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>May 17, 2006 Help Make LIVESTRONG DAY One to
Remember "It's time for our nation to address our issues. Together, we can help
change things for the better. As a team, we can make a difference for survivors."
-Lance
Armstrong</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END>
FAMILY:
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>Schedule appt.
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>May 17, 2006 Senate Select Committee on
Intelligence 2 photographers take my picture outside Hearings Gave phone number
to call. FOXNews.com - Intel Panels Hear From NSA Director - Politics Visit and
request meeting with receptionist or another attorney
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>May 18, 2006 Availabity Staffing Follow up with
Amber, said she had someone else in office that could help find some part-time
consulting. Talked with . Did not even read resume, told him if he had a client that
wanted to increase profits to call me. Said only dealt with
manufacturing,..</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></
END></END></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END><
style="FONT-FAMILY:
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>.</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP0
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>March 29, 2006, 4:05 PM ET Jonathan Cohen, N.Y.
Taylor for the 2006 Rainforest B... Joe Pinto Lied
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>As per the instructions of the receptionist in
Senator Specter's office yesterday, I would like to meet with the Senator regarding
information that I have previously sent.
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>Please forward a date at your earliest
convenience.
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>Thank You for your considerations.
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>Advanced Media Group
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>Stan Caterbone
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>mailto: amgroup01@msn.com
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>Fax: (717) 427-
1621</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></EN
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>May 19, 2006 Dave Pflumm and Brett Stabley
Thought they stole my
wife</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>May 21, 2006 Harleysville Claim Priority
Mail</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>May 22, 2006 Payments for Advanced Media
Group Vonage Phone 17.48 Rhapsody .99 Go to My PC 24.95 EBay 15.95 Andale
16.95 Efax 10.00
Nextel</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></EN
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>155.00
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>May 22, 2006 Advance Media v. Mike, Stabley,
Pflumm COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
LANCASTER COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION Advanced Media Group Stanley J. Caterbone
Ma2y2 202 County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania: Agent is not processing above claim
and keeps lying to me. After I submitted claim forms and did not hear from him, I
called him and he said that a sworn and notarized affidavit required embossed seal
from notary, proved that was not the case. Then he
s...</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END>
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>May 22, 2006 PA Insurance Complaint Agent is not
processing above claim and keeps lying to me. After I submitted claim forms and did
not hear from him, I called him and he said that a sworn and notarized affidavit
required embossed seal from notary, proved that was not the case. Then he s...
Mike, I (Advanced Media Group) am suing you for libel, slander and defamation of
character. Just what is it you are trying to accomplish by slandering me with this
mental illness allegation?
Verdana"><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM style="FONT-FAMILY:
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>Yave told me he knew that I went to a different bank to
deposit the funds, and shortly thereafter, you called me and said
that your regional sales manager received some complaints from some wholesalers
about the updates I was sending out to you and the other clients that I had with
AIM.</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>Y</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP
@BUYPHILLIPS.COM>ou
need to come clean with how my business with AIM back in 2001 was lost. I find it
ironic that as soon as I received my inheritance from Dad,
D<CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM style="FONT-FAMILY:
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>ou see Mike, since 1987, you all have been
interfering with my business and my finances. You take my money and my income,
and when I try to resolve that through the courts, which is precisely where matters
of this kind are resolved, you go back and slander and libel me with this mental
illness
allegation.</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END>
FAMILY:
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>You have not seen me since February of 2005, and
I have only spoken with you on a few occasions, very briefly, and you never
mentioned anything about me being mentally
ill.</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END>
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>Now, you are going to have to answer in court
what type of behavior you have witnessed that leads you to the conclusion that I am
having mental illness
problems.</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END><
FAMILY:
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>I am in the midst of litigating these and other past
issues in the United States Court of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Civil Action
05-2288 (which is sealed to the public), and you are obstructing justice and interfering with my right to due process.
Everyone that has libeled me with these mental illness allegations will find that they
will find a similar civil action filed against
them.</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></E
style="FONT-FAMILY:
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>I only have a hundred dollars left, and Mom still
owes me from the judgment that was awarded to me in Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas last July. Legally, I cannot leave Lancaster until all of my legal issues
are properly adjucated through the courts, or I will face bench warrants for my
arrest.</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></EN
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>So, I am asking you once again to overnight mail
me the final payment of $800 and I will satisfy the judgment against 1250 Fremont
Street. You can ask Mom just how much she has paid me so far. A few months ago
she sent me a check for $200, and said she would send me the rest of the
payments. Last week she said she would send me a check, and I still have not
received
it.</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END>
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>Attached is the civil action that I am
filing.</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></EN
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>And you also need to stop interfering with my
relationship with Sheryl, and you better stay away from
her.</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>----Original Message Follows----
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>From:
mtciidd@aol.com</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></
style="FONT-FAMILY:
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>To:
amgroup01@msn.com</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.CO
M></END></END></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></E
style="FONT-FAMILY:
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>Subject: Re: The right thing?
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 08:45:06
-0400</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></EN
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>Stan you need to get help. You need to see a
doctor and get back on your medication. I know you dont see this but your not well
and we want to help. If you see a doctor I will help financially. Money is not going to
solve your problems in your current condition. Your entire solution to every this is
through the courts and what happens when you exhausted all your options and that
what? Mom is getting very old and we dont know how much time she has so please
leave her alone and you can deal with me. I wish you could see what youre doing to
yourself but i guess you cant. I know youre pissed off but we want to help. What is
happening with your house? How far behind are you in your mortgage payments
and dont give me your bankruptcy info. Because donor or later your going to have
to
settle.</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></EN
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>Just trying to
help.</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>Mike</COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGRO
UP01@MSN.COM></END></END></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NE
T></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END
></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAIL
BOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> From: Stan Caterbone
<AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUS
E.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END></END></END></AMGAUCTIO
NS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></EN
D></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@M
SN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>To:
mtciidd@aol.com</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></
AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMC
AST.NET></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END>
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Sent: Fri, 19 May 2006
09:06:18
-0400</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP0
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Subject: The right
thing?
</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@M
SN.COM></END></END></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></EN
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.
COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></EN
01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><CM
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Just what did you
mean,
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>and this is your
brother
Stan.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP0
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Advanced Media
Group</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP0
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Stan
Caterbone</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGR
OUP01@MSN.COM></END></END></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.N
ET></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></EN
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>mailto:
amgroup01@msn.com</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GO
V></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@
COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></
END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.CO
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>www.amgglobalentert
ainmentgroup.com</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>
</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@CO
MCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></EN
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Fax: (717) 427-
1621</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP0
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Advanced Media
Group</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP0
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>220 Stone Hill
Road</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP0
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Conestoga, PA
17516</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>May 23, 2006 Email
Convention Center Recommendations from March 2005 1 of 2 5/24/2006 4:32 AM
Sent : Tuesday, May 23, 2006 1:21 PM... Filed appeal and Forma Papaus to Appeal
Reading Traffic Tickets
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>May 23, 2006
Convention Over Budget Lancaster New Era Lancaster New Era: Center bids $25M
over budget http://eedition.lancasteronline.com/pages/news/edition/NEPM/200... 1
of 3 5/23/2006 8:19 PM
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>costs could be 30%
higher than... CV-0000160-06 Comcast must send notice to defend, otherwise do
not attend. Tried to make me miss this hearing, original taken, I thought it was for
June 26, went today to get
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>May 26, 2006 Hearing
Caterbone v. Comcast CV-0000160-06 Comcast must send notice to defend,
otherwise do not attend.
D></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@
O
CAST.NET></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END
></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>
</CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>May 26, 2006 Barley
Snyder, LLC - Lancaster General Hospital File Stolen Gave formal notice to Attorneys
Meagan Ford and Mattson regarding LGH file stolen, said allegations that their client
may have been involved, Caroline (African American woman) at reception desk.
Called to executive secretary of both attorneys, were not
a...</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01
@MSN.COM></END></END></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>May 26, 2006 Judge
Mary J. McLaughlin Letter faxed Advanced Media Group 220 Stone Hill Road
Conestoga, PA
17516</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>May 26, 2006 Judicial
Conduct States District Court for the Eastern District Please explain your complaint
on the reverse of this from. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA JUDICIAL CONDUCT
BOARD Pennsylvania Place 301 Chestnut Street, Suite 403 OFFICIAL USE
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>May 29, 2006 Judicial
Conduct Review Board Complaint filed Please explain your complaint on the reverse
of this from. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA JUDICIAL CONDUCT BOARD
Pennsylvania Place 301 Chestnut Street, Suite 403 Harrisburg, PA
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>.</AMGROUP01@MSN.
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>May 29, 2006 Grassel
Answer to Civil Complaint
Due</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>May 30, 2006
Southern Regional Police Dept Answer
Due</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>May 30, 2006 Kenny
Chesney -- Opening for Chesney will be Sugarland and Jake
Owen</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP0
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>May 31, 2006 Artie
email for Convention Center March 2005 Artie, thanks for the intelligent reply and
discussion. You should understand, there is not too much that you have said that I
disagree with. You are right on point in your analysis. However, too understand my
perception, you must understand my
experience...</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMG
ROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.
NET></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></E
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>May 31, 2006 Robert
Walker email Advanced Media Group From: Advanced Media Group
[amgroup01@msn.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 3:48
AM</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>amgroup01@msn.com
Printed: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 9:49
AM</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>June 1,
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Mr Caterbones am
responding to your inquiry concerning your edition. The account has been stopped.
When it was started, we were provided with a credit/debit card to pay for the access
on a monthly basis. Starting 4/26, when we tried to process a monthly charge, it
was declined. It had been tried for with weeks of 5/3, 5/10, 5/17 & 5/24 with no
success. Access was suspended on 5/26 with an amount due of $ 3.88. We received
your payment of $ 3.88, which paid your account to date. If you wish to have access
to the edition again, we would need to have a credit or debit card to use for the
monthly access charge. If I can assist you further, please contact me at 291-8627 or
sign up on our
website.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROU
P01@MSN.COM></END></END></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Shirley</AMGROUP01
@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></EN
D></END></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></E
ND></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AM
FAMILY:
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Circulation Customer
Service</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROU
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Lancaster
Newspapers,
Inc.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>_____</AMGROUP01@
MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END>
FAMILY:
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>From : May 31, 2006
9:41 AM... John Wert Assistant to Judge Scheaffer 610-478-6675 610-478-, file again
to reconsider?" shoul... COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COURT OF COMMON
PLEAS LANCASTER COUNTY CRIMINIAL DIVISION Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
:</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@M
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>June 06, 2006 - Letter
from the PA Department of
Welfare</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROU
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC
WELFARE</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGRO
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>LANCASTER COUNTY
ASSISTMCE
OFFICE</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>832 Manor
Street</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP0
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>P.0. Box 4967
I</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@M
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Lancaster,
Pennsylvania 17604-
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>June
7,2006</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP
01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM></DIV
>
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Mr. Stan J.
Caterbone,</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGR
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Per Administrative Law
Judge Scott Staller's stipulation, the following information is due
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>before 6120106 in the
Lanmter County Assistance
Office:</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Verification of your
income or lack them35 to show how you have been
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>supporting yourself
since 2003 without income. This would include the
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>bankruptcy
verification, loans against your credit cards,
etc.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>A copy of a photo
identification.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AM
GROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAS
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Current bank
statements or verification the accounts are
closed.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Utility
bills</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Mortgage payments in
the form of a mortgage book or receipts showing your
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>monthly
payment.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGRO
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>The PA 600 application
form you took with you at your last
interview.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGRO
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>If you have any
questions or concerns, please contact Mrs. Rychalsky, Income
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Maintenance
Casework Supervisor, at the Lancaster County Assistance Office at (717:)
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>299-7487. Mrs.
Rychalsky will be banding any further issues regarding this
appeal.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROU
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Thank
you.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Amy
Montgomery</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMG
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Income Maintenance
Casework
Supwvisor</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGR
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Lancaster County
Assistance
Office</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP0
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>June 06,
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Tim,</AMGROUP01@
FAMILY:
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>I had a problem at
your Sunoco Gas Station on Orange and Prince street at about 2:30 am today. I went
to get some gasoline and my tank was low when I left my house, but the low fuel
indicator light did not come
on.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>I paid the cashier with
14 silver half dollars and got a pack of Eagle Lights and the rest $3.93 in gasoline,
or about 1.37 gallons, and pumped the gas into my
Honda.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Now, on the way
home, at about half way my low fuel indicator light came on. I know that I live about
7 miles from the Sunoco, and my 2005 Honda Odyssey gets at least 20 mpg
city.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana"><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP
01@MSN.COM><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END>
<END><END><END><AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END><EN
D><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@
MSN.COM>So, apparently, your Sunoco
Station took my $3.93 and never gave me any gas, the meter on the pump
moved and shut off at $3.93, but I am alleging that I never put one drop of gasoline
in my Honda, yet the pump made it look like I was pumping gas into my
Honda.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP
@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.C
OM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END><END><END><END><END><END><END
><END><END><END><END><END><AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><
END><END><END><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>
SN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM>
<AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END><END><END><END
><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><AMGAUCTIONS@CO
MCAST.NET><END><END><END><END><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><COMMENTS
@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>I have the
receipt.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROU
OX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MS
N.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END><END><END><END><END><END><
END><END><END><END><END><END><AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET><END
><END><END><END><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.G
OV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITE
HOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END></END></END></AMGA
UCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></END></END></END
></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP
01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.
COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END><END><END
><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><AMGAUCTIO
NS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END><END><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><CO
MMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>June 09, 2006 - Hearing
for Conestoga Speeding Ticket TR-0000245-06 TR-0000244-
06</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@
MSN.COM></END></END></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></E
D></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@B
UYPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM
><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><
END><END><END><END><END><AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END
><END><END><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><A
MGROUP01@MSN.COM>As per your request, enclosed is a document that describes
the last time I had a traffic citation in Conestoga Township. As I have stated for the
record, every time I seek due process that the constitution of the United States
affords me, this is what happens. I have 8 (fabrications and lies) or so similar
hearing in Lancaster County, I requested a continuance because of the demands of
my Federal litigation and the conspiratorial approach to obstruct justice and subvert
my Federal civil actions has me without the proper time to prepare a sufficient
defense. I had wished to include the in court testimony, but time was lacking to
prepare. I was up since 2:00 am the previous morning working on a brief that was
due the Honorable Anita Brody of the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania on the same day as your Court
Hearing.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROU
MMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Every District Justice in
Lancaster County denied me a motion for continuance to grant me sufficient time to
prepare for the Hearings this month. You stated for the record that you could not
because of a Court Order to hear this case within a 90 day time period. I was also
denied an Informa Pauperis (I am indigent due to circumstances beyond my control)
from every Business Judge on duty, which also conveniently denied me my right to
have a Court Stenographer transcribe your Hearing, as mandated in the Rules of
Civil Procedure of Pennsylvania. May I subpoena your Surveillance Camera for a
transcription of my Hearing? You will not get away with your small town politics,
discriminatory and prejudicial antics used to intimidate me and divert my attention,
time and resources from my Federal Civil Actions. I remind you that you are an
Officer of the Court and will be held accountable to the
law.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01
BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.CO
M><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END><END><END><END><END><END><END>
<END><END><END><END><END><AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><EN
D><END><END><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><
AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE
.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END></END></END></AMGAUCTION
S@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END
></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MS
N.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><
AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END><END><END><END>
<END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><AMGAUCTIONS@COM
CAST.NET><END><END><END><END><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><COMMENTS
@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CO
MMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END></END>
OM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBO
X@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END
MSN.COM><COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>June 09,
2006 Hearing for PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT 717-786-2072 fax
YPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>
<AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><E
ND><END><END><END><END><AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END
MGROUP01@MSN.COM>Thank you for your response Mr. Caterbone. I would again
explain to you that you should contact E-fax directly at the phone number I gave
you in my initial email to discuss what you believe to be a double charge. It is YOUR
responsibility to discuss the charges with E-fax as you gave them the Visa gift card
number. The bank cannot be responsible for YOUR decisions in regards to which you
give YOUR card number. Good luck with YOUR inquiry with E-fax. If E-fax decides
you were double billed, then E-fax will refund your card. Again, call E-fax and use
the reference number that I gave you in regards to YOUR account. At this point,
Fulton bank will not be refunding any funds to you. Have a good day
Sir. </AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></A
MGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCA
ST.NET></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END>
CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@M
SN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END><END><END><END><END><END>
<END><END><END><END><END><END><AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET><EN
D><END><END><END><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.
GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>-----Original Message-----
MGROUP01@MSN.COM>From: Advanced Media Group
[mailto:amgroup01@msn.com]</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEH
OUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END></END></END></AMGAU
CTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></END></END></END>
1@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.C
OM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END><END><END>
<END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><AMGAUCTION
S@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END><END><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><COM
MENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Sent: Thursday, June 08,
2006 6:55
PM</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01
AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>To: Mummert,
Carl</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01
AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Cc:
amgauctions@comcast.net</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUS
@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM> Subject: RE: Fraud Inquiry
by you on Visa Gift
Card</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01
AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Fulton Bank owes me
$45.98.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROU
MMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Sir, you are blind, there
are (2) $26.90 charges on my Gift card Transaction details. And both were used to
compute the balance of
$-.81.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP0
<AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>I did not authorize the $10.00 Efax
charge. </AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>
></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01
@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END><END><END><END><END><EN
D><END><END><END><END><END><END><AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET>
<END><END><END><END><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><COMMENTS@WHITEHOU
SE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>The $10.08 from Turkey Hill is erroneous; I did
not purchase 10.08 of gasoline on June 5th or
4th.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01
AMGROUP01@MSN.COM> Now Sir, I have a brief due in the chambers of U.S.
District Court of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania's Honorable Anita Brody,
Caterbone v. Fulton Bank,
tomorrow. </AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GO
M></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP0
1@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END><END><END><END><END><E
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET
><END><END><END><END><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><COMMENTS@WHITEH
OUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>You, Sir, are harassing me with your lies,
and you are obstructing justice and my due process by harassing me with your
phone call right when I began to formulate my
brief. </AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></
GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Date Description Amount
MGROUP01@MSN.COM>6/3/2006 Pending - J2 *EFAX PLUS SERV 323-817-3205
CAUS
-25.9</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP0
@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>6/7/2006 EMPIRE BEAUTY SCHOOL
#11 EMPIRE BEAUTY SCHO LANCASTER PAUS
-8</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@
MGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.
GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END></END></END></AMGAUCTION
@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>6/7/2006 TURKEY HILL #0251 Q69
TURKEY HILL #0251 LANCASTER PAUS
@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>6/6/2006 THE UPS STORE #3413
THE UPS STORE #341 LANCASTER PAUS
@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>6/6/2006 FUNKS FARM MARKET N
GARDE FUNKS FARM MARKET MILLERSVILLE PAUS
@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>6/6/2006 ATM Balance Inquiry Fee
@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>6/6/2006 MILLERSVILLE MART
MILLERSVILLE PAUS
@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>6/6/2006 J2 *EFAX PLUS SERVICE
J2 *EFAX PLUS SERV 323-817-3205 CAUS
@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>6/6/2006 TENNISTRAINER EQUIP
STORE TENNISTRAINER EQUI 760-9171841 CAUS
-16.18</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP
@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>6/5/2006 VONAGE *PRICE+TAXES
VONAGE *PRICE+TAXE 866-243-4357 NJUS
@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>6/4/2006 DOLLAR GENERAL 1805
COLUMBIA AVE LANCASTER PAUS
@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>6/4/2006 J2 *EFAX PLUS SERVICE
J2 *EFAX PLUS SERV 323-817-3205 CAUS
@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>6/2/2006 ATM Withdrawal Fee
@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>6/2/2006 PNC NE 1503 COLUMBIA
AVE LANCASTER 1PAUS
@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>6/2/2006 Funds Transfer from
Fulton Financial Corp
@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Balance of all Transactions
-175.81</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROU
OV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Balance of Fraudulent Transactions $45.98
@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>From: Mummert, Carl
[mailto:CMummert@fultonbank.com]
MGROUP01@MSN.COM>Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 6:26
PM</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01
AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>To:
amgroup01@msn.com</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GO
M></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMG
ROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END><END><END><END><EN
D><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAS
T.NET><END><END><END><END><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><COMMENTS@WH
ITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Subject: Fraud Inquiry by you on Visa
Gift
Card</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01
AMGROUP01@MSN.COM> Mr. Caterbone,
MGROUP01@MSN.COM>I just tried to call you to talk to you in regards to your
request for information on possible fraud in relation to your Visa Gift card you
purchased last week. As you thought it best to hang up on me as I tried to explain
what I found out by calling E-fax to research your gift card, I will now explain in brief
detail what the fees were you inquired about
he $10.00 fee on June 6th is a pre-paid amount E-fax charges to allow you to fax
pages @ .10 per page. When you use the $10.00, E-fax will then pre-pay/charge
another $10.00. As for your inquiry of being double billed the $25.90. I spoke with a
gentleman named Vincent @ E-Fax and he stated that there is not a double charge
and that you were only billed $25.90 one time for 2 months service (May 2nd to
June 1st and June 2 to July 3rd). The monthly charge is $12.95 and since the card #
you provided E-fax in May was denied, they billed you for 2 months in the beginning
of June. The Reference # for this information is 001428472. If you have any further
questions in regards to YOUR E-fax account, I would ask you call E-fax yourself. The
# for E-fax is (323) 817-3206. At this time I do not have any information for you in
regards to your inquiry at the $10.08 charged on June
6th. </AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></A
MGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCA
ST.NET></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END>
GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Mr. Caterbone, since you again feel the best way
to handle this situation is to hang up on me when I was trying to give you this
information, I would request that you discontinue contacting myself. I do not have
the time to continue to try and help you when you are unwilling to listen to the
information I have to pass onto you. This is the second time in 3 days that you
disrespected me, with the 1st being on Tuesday, June 6th when you called me
ignorant and I would respectfully request that you no longer ask for help from me. I
have tried to be polite and respect you and I would hope you could do the same.
When Fulton bank completes its research as to what the $10.08 charge was that
you are disputing, the bank will contact you by email or letter.
 </AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMG
AILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.
COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END><END><END><END><END><END><EN
D><END><END><END><END><END><AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET><END>
<END><END><END><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV
><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Thank you for your attention to this email and I hope
the information I passed onto you so far is useful.
MGROUP01@MSN.COM>Respectfully,
@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Carl E Mummert
MGROUP01@MSN.COM>Branch Manager
MGROUP01@MSN.COM>Penn Square Branch
MGROUP01@MSN.COM>Fulton Bank
MGROUP01@MSN.COM>(717)291-2451(Phone)
MGROUP01@MSN.COM>(717)295-4792(Fax)
MGROUP01@MSN.COM>cmummert@fultonbank.com
@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>June 11, 2006 Country Music
Awards CMA Music Fest Sets Initial
Lineup</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP
<AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>February 13, 2006, 4:30 PM
ET</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@
MGROUP01@MSN.COM>Katie Hasty, N.Y. Brooks & Dunn, Brad Paisley, Carrie
Underwood and Montgomery Gentry are
YPHILLIPS.COM><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMG
ROUP01@MSN.COM><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><
END><END><END><END><AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END
><END><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP
01@MSN.COM>Music Festival. Slated for June 8-11 in
down...</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP
@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><
AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><EN
D><END><END><END><END><AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END>
<END><END><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AM
GROUP01@MSN.COM>MDT citation for leaving car unattended to go look for Sheryl
in Terminal. Left car and talked to
01@MSN.COM>Security Officer and he said it was ok and ordered me to move car,
and I did. He did not write me a
01@MSN.COM>citation on that day.
@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>June 15, 2006 Hearing DJ
Ballentine Caterbone v.
Comcast</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGRO
BOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@M
GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHIT
EHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END></END></END></AMG
AUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></END></END></END
MMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>From : Cheryl L. Kovaly
<CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM>Sent : Wednesday, June 21, 2006 1:13 PMTo : "Stan
Caterbone" <AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Subject : RE: Caterbone v. Southern
Regional Police
Commission</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROU
P01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></
OM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP
MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP0
1@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMM
ENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END></END></E
ND></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></END></
</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@B
UYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END><E
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><A
MGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END><END><AMGROUP01@MSN.
COM><COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LA
VERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Cheryl L. Kovaly, Esquire
</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.C
OM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END
@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <
CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.CO
M><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><EN
D><END><AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END><END><AMGR
OUP01@MSN.COM><COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>
<CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Lavery, Faherty, Young
& Patterson, P.C.
<CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>225 Market Street, Suite
304
<CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Harrisburg, PA 17101
<CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>ckovaly@laverylaw.com
<CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>(717) 233-6633
<CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>June 19,
2006</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@M
SN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END><
R><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MS
N.COM><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END>
<END><END><AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END><END><A
MGROUP01@MSN.COM><COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.C
OM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MS
N.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@
WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END></END></END></
AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></END></END><
/END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMG
ROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHIL
LIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END><END><
END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><AMGAU
CTIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END><END><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>
<COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYL
AW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>H. Gus
Dorn</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@M
OM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Commonwealth Of
Pennsylvania</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROU
MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Office Of
Attorney
General</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01
> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01
><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MS
N.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Bureau Of
Consumer
Protection</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP0
1@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></EN
N.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Harrisburg
Regional
Office</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@
BR><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@M
SN.COM><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END
><END><END><AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END><END><
AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.
COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>301 Chestnut
Street, Suite
105</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@MS
N.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></
GROUP01@MSN.COM><COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.CO
M><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Harrisburg, PA
17101</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@
COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>(7171 787-
AW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>May 31,
AW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Re: A-002594-
AW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>As per our conversation, I will address the
issues contained in Mr. Yarnells response to your office. Please not that I was not
given any of the exhibits that Mr. Yarnell submitted to your
office.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@
COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@M
SN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS
@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END></END></END>
MGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYP
HILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END><END
><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><AMG
AUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END><END><AMGROUP01@MSN.CO
M><COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LAVE
RYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>On August 26,2005 we entered into an
agreement with Mr. Caterbone for the installation and monitoring of an alarm
system at 220 Stone Hill Road Conestoga, PA 17518. Our standard pricing for the
system he ordered is $1,899.00 and then he would pay $192.00 per year for the
monitoring of the system. Another option he was given was to pay $1,324.00 for the
installation and then pay $299.40 per year for 5 years. Mr. Caterbone chose the 2nd
option. (Attached marked items A and B are the contracts and the service
rider).</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@
COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Above paragraph is
not
contested.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP0
N.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@
MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENT
S@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END></END></END
></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></END></EN
D></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></
AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUY
PHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END><EN
D><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><AM
GAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END><END><AMGROUP01@MSN.C
OM><COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LAV
ERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Mr. Caterbone gave us a check in the
amount of $800.00 for the system deposit so that we could start the job. (Item C)
The installation was scheduled for September 30, 2005. Our technician arrived at
the site and installed the system. Mr. Caterbone agreed that the system was
installed to his satisfaction and also added 2 additional key fobs. (See installers
check list, Item
D).</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@MS
M><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Please see Exhibit E:
Email of October 1, 2005 of Installation
Problems</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01
ERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>This check list goes on every job for the
end user to sign. Please note the highlighted item. Please find attached a copy of
Mr. Caterbones final invoice in the amount of $1,021.40. This was to be paid to our
installer. He told our technician that he would send it in. (Item E) can see we
performed all of our duties as we
agreed. </AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></
AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.
COM></END></END></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END><
ILLIPS.COM><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGRO
UP01@MSN.COM><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><EN
D><END><END><END><AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END>
<END><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP0
1@MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Please see
Exhibit A: Bankruptcy Chapter 11 Petition, Yarnell Securities is on the matrix of
Creditors.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP0
N.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Please see
Exhibit B: Bankruptcy Chapte11 Appeal Judge Anita Brody Appeal
Response.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP0
Exhibit C: Bankruptcy Chapter 11 Definition and
Regulations.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROU
VERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>We clearly state on our contracts that
the customer provides the phone lines. (Item A paragraphs 7 and 8) We also offer
alternate methods of communication for all of our systems. (Cellular Back Up)
(Internet Monitoring). These were refused. See Item B highlighted
item.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@
COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Please refer to
Exhibit D: Verizon Duplicate Bill for phone number 717-872-6984 which was a
dedicated land line for the security
system.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01
ERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Attached is a printout showing that the
system was tested and working properly. Our contracts clearly state providing a
phone line is the responsibility of Mr. Caterbone. Mr. Caterbones system was
completed September 30, 2005 and as of this date we still have not been paid the
balance of his monies
due. </AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AM
GROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.CO
IPS.COM><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP0
MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Above
paragraph is not
contested.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP0
ERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Mr. Caterbone has the system. We
provided the complete installation in a timely fashion. Mr. Caterbone has been
called numerous times to collect the balance due. We provided more than 8 hours of
labor at Mr. Caterbone residence, as well the equipment with a normal selling price
of over $1800.00 plus the extra he received. Your help would be greatly
appreciated.
<CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.CO
M></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHI
TEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END></END></END></AM
GAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></END></END></EN
D></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROU
P01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.
MMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.
COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Please see Exhibit A: Bankruptcy Chapter 11
Petition, Yarnell Securities is on the matrix of
Creditors.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP0
Exhibit B: Bankruptcy Chapte11 Appeal Judge Anita Brody Appeal
Response.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP0
Exhibit C: Bankruptcy Chapter 11 Definition and
Regulations.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROU
VERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>In paragraph 8. of the Residential
Sales/Service Agreement it states: there will be no monitoring..if the telephone
line is interrupted unless the customer elects to pay for additional technology that
will report such an
interruption.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROU
VERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Upon the execution and installation of
agreement, I was told that a dedicated telephone line was required so that any
interruption with phone service would be detected. Why would you pay for a
Security System with alarms and a monitoring system that contained all of the
technological advances if it was vulnerable to someone snipping your phone line
outside of your house, and negating that Security System as moot?
COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>I wonder if all of the customers for Yarnell Security
Systems are aware of this
vulnerability.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROU
VERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>In addition, I was billed for monitoring
my security system up to April 3, when in fact my dedicated phone line with Verizon
was terminated on or before December 24,
2005.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@
RYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>And you told me on the telephone in our
conversation that this is not fraud?
COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>You see, I have issues with Office of the Attorney
General that date back to 1987 that I am trying to resolve in Federal Court, and
must assume that you are retaliating against me for my filing of certain Federal Civil
Actions, which are now currently being litigated in the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGRO
UP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>
.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGRO
1@MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGRO
UP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CO
MSN.COM><COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><CKOVAL
Y@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>I do not appreciate your tone, nor
do I appreciate your accusations or demands. I agreed to provide the commitment
documents to you as a courtesy. As stated, the 302 document was not in the
paperwork received from the Chief. Although additional documents are expected
from my client, I have no obligation at this stage of litigation to provide any
documents to you. Given your attitude, I am not inclined to extend you any
additional courtesies.
COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>June 20, 2006 Hearing East Lampeter Prelim
Hearing Docket No. CF-0000169-06 02-3-02 MDJ Commins - On June 19, found that
someone hacked my computer and removed my scheduled appointment for the
Hearing with District Justice Commins the following day on June 20th. The
appointment schedule was apparently removed soon after I entered it. I always look
forward to calendar schedule, and would have naturally been preparing days before
Hearing. Then went to file and found that someone removed important documents
required for Hearing, from my office. I immediately called Honorable Justice
Commins at 2:25 pm. And asked for a continuance due to the fact that I had no time
to prepare. She told me she could not and would address it at the Hearing at
10:30am. Arrived and requested to get a copy of my file from District Justice Staff.
All witnesses from the Prosecution were present and called into courtroom about 30
minutes before me with other people), which I was not aware of. Did not know what
type of hearing I was having. Kept asking for an explanation. Approximately 11:15
am - Hearing started by Honorable Commins with a woman Prosecutor (Said she
was from Lancaster District Attorney Office Ms. Mazzouri?) on opposing desk. I
immediately moved for a motion for a continuance due to the above, and the
District Justice declined, and I asked what the proceeding was, and she said "we will
begin this proceeding, Prosecutor call your first witness". Thought it was like last
arraignment on December 5 in Magisterial District Justice Reuter, just Officer
Bezzerd and me. Had to cross witnesses with no time to prepare. Could not raise
concern that the Affidavit of Probable Cause was changed on May 18, 2006 and
quite different from original Affidavit of October 2005. (See in Original Complaint
File Attachments). 2 Witnesses lied extensively, and kept looking to prosecuter for
direction. One witness lied so maliciously and testified under oath that I said "I wish
George Bush and all the Marines would Die Did not know what to do, interrupted
the hearing and asked the judge what was going on, almost walked out of
courtroom, because I was so upset. A subject matter that I am very passionate and
knowledgable about, the War in Iraq and the Troops - always trying to educate so
people would at least support the troops. Ordered case moved to and signed Bail
Bond and received official notice for an Arraignment in Lancaster County
Courthouse on July 26,
2006..................</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMG
ROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.CO
IPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMG
01@MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGR
OUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></C
OMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END></END
></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></EN
COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILB
OX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><EN
D><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><EN
D><AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END><END><AMGROUP01@
Y@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>June 21, 2006 - SRP Officer said
could not get a copy of files after asking Office Manager - wanted me to cause
disturbance so could cite me with disorderly conduct or get another 302 She was
abusive, kept trying to get me mad with back talk and kept telling me it will cost me
for citations, I would have to pay whether in Bankruptcy or not.
<CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Said will call when files
are
copied.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@
RYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>June 22, 2006 - Digital Cable went down at
3:00 am when trying to complete Brief for Chapter 11 Motion to Convert Order.
Comcast later said it was a system glitch, returned service on Friday, June 23 at
6:00pm.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01
ERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>June 23, 2006 - Lancaster City Bicycle
Cop Said I went through stop sign, he was baiting me as I drove by him in alley
street, would not ride near curb Did not run stop sign Would not give me a
document for subpoena, staffer kept giving me a hard time as usual, would not give
me instructions in writing, told me to put it in writing, no instructions, with fee for
service, I said Informa Pauperis, she said give it to judge, I said what am I suppose
to write? Judge came out and said do you want to speak with me, I'm sick of you
insulting my staff, I said lets go. Gave me a lecture on insulting her staff, bit my
tongue, asked for a doc or if I could use PA Rules, said "this is the way we do things
in my office" I said PA Rules governs her office, she said no. I walked
out.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@MS
M><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.
COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@W
HITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END></END></END></A
MGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></END></END></
END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGR
OUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLI
PS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END><END><E
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLA
W.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>June 27, 2006 Pennsylvania State Police;
Trooper David Huanis, Forensic Unit; 717-290-1976; Was referred by Southern
Regional Police Department during the response to my call in the morning of June
24, 2006; said he could not provide me the service; no one will come and fingerprint
my office or residence. Regardless of all of the complaints and responses by law
authorities, no one will process any procedure that would result in prosecution. I
contain video surveillance of perpetrator in my residence, and evidence of forced
entry.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@M
END><
N
@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><A
MGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM
></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@
UYPHILLIPS.COM><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AM
GROUP01@MSN.COM><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END>
<END><END><END><END><AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><EN
D><END><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGRO
UP01@MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMG
ROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END></EN
D></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></E
ND></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN
.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><CMAILBOX@
BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END><
END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><
AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END><END><AMGROUP01@MSN
.COM><COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><CKOVALY@L
AVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVAL
Y@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GO
OUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP0
1@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGR
OUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM
></END></END></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END></EN
PS.COM><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP0
LLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END><END>
<END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><AMGA
UCTIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END><END><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM
><COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LAVER
YLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LA
VERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></
GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MS
N.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01
OUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.CO
ENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.CO
M><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW
.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP
GROUP01@MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></
AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.CO
M></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END
BOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><E
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><E
ND><AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END><END><AMGROUP01
@MSN.COM><COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><CKOV
ALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></C
KOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOU
SE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END></END></END></AMGAUCTI
ONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></E
MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AM
GROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END><END><END><END><E
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><AMGAUCTIONS@COMCA
ST.NET><END><END><END><END><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><COMMENTS@W
HITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMG
ROUP01@MSN.COM>7. HAVE YOU FILED A COMPLAINT ABOUT THIS MATTER WITH
ANY OTHER AGENCY?
<CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>YES
NO</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@MS
M><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>YES</AMGROUP01@
ERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@
LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV>
SE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@
MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP
01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></E
M> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP0
MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>IF SO, PLEASE
SPECIFY WHICH ONE(S) AND THE DATE YOU FILED, TO THE BEST OF YOUR
RECOLLECTION.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGR
PS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGR
OUP01@MSN.COM><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><E
ND><END><END><END><AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END
Y@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY
GENERAL JULY
AW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>PENNSYLVANIA SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 29, 1987 (INTERVIEW WITH AGENT HOWARD EISLER IN MY
RESIDENCE AND RECORDED WITH
PERMISSION)</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGRO
Y@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE
JULY
AW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>PENNSYLVANIA HOUSING AND FINANCE
AGENCY NOVEMBER 1987 AND OCTOBER
AW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>PENNSYLVANIA JUDICIAL CONDUCT BOARD
<CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>COMPLAINT NO. 2006-
214;215 MAY
OM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>MEETING AND EMAIL
TO CHIEF LEGAL COUNSEL MR. JOSEPH
MASSEY</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01
SE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@
MSN.COM>8. HAVE YOU FILED ANY COURT ACTIONS IN THIS MATTER? YES
NO</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@MS
M><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>YES</AMGROUP01@
></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGR
OUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END><END><END><END><END
><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.
NET><END><END><END><END><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><COMMENTS@WHIT
EHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROU
P01@MSN.COM>IF SO, PLEASE SPECIFY IN WHAT COURT AND THE DATE YOU FILED,
TO THE BEST OF YOUR
RECOLLECTION.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGR
PS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGR
OUP01@MSN.COM><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><E
ND><END><END><END><AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END
Y@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>United State District Court For The
Eastern District of
Pennsylvania</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROU
MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>05-2288 -
May 16, 2005 CATERBONE v. LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON ET
AL;</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@MS
M><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>06-1538 June 8,
2005 CATERBONE v. FULTON
BANK</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@M
AW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>United States Bankruptcy Court Eastern
District;
<CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>05-23059 May 23, 2005
PETITION FOR CHAPTER 11
BANKRUPTCY</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGRO
Y@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Pennsylvania Court of
Commonwealth Pleas Lancaster County;
<CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>CI 03401 April, 2005
CATERBONE v. SOUTHERN REGIONAL POLICE DEPARTMENT ET AL;
<CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>CI-03349 April, 2005
CATERBONE v. LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL ET
AL;</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@MS
GROUP01@MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></
AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.CO
M></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END
BOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><E
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><E
ND><AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END><END><AMGROUP01
@MSN.COM><COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><CKOV
ALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></C
KOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOU
SE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END></END></END></AMGAUCTI
ONS@COMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></E
MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AM
GROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END><END><END><END><E
ND><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><AMGAUCTIONS@COMCA
ST.NET><END><END><END><END><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><COMMENTS@W
HITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMG
ROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></
AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.
COM></END></END></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.NET></END><
ILLIPS.COM><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGRO
Y@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>9. IF YOU ARE REPRESENTED BY
AN ATTORNEY, PLEASE PROVIDE YOUR ATTORNEYS NAME, ADDRESS AND PHONE
NUMBER:</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01
N.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>Pro Se
Litigant</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01
ERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>10. WHAT DO YOU WANT TO SEE HAPPEN
AS A RESULT OF YOUR COMPLAINT?
<CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>a. Restoration of Civil
Rights</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@
COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>b. Restoration of
Civil
Liberties</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01
N.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>c. Protection of
Right to Due Process Without Undo
Influence</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01
N.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>d. Protection of
Personal and Business
Property</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01
N.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>e. Financial
Remedies Including The Value of Stolen Property; Lost Opportunity; Lost Business
Interests</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01
N.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>f. Prosecution of
Assailants and
Perpetrators</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROU
VERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>11. PLEASE EXPLAIN YOUR COMPLAINT
INCLUDING THE DETAILS SUCH AS DATE, TIME AND LOCATION. YOU MAY USE
ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY.
<CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>SEE ABOVE PAGES 2 TO
68</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN
.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></E
M><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>a. RETALITORY
ACTIONS DUE TO THE DISCLOSURE OF ILLICIT AND ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES WITHIN
INTERNATIONAL SIGNAL AND CONTROL IN JUNE OF 1987; WHICH WAS PROSECUTED
AND CONVICTED IN
OM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM> b. RETALITORY
ACTIONS FOR THE COMMUNICATIONS AND SOLICITING OF LEGAL COUNSEL TO MS.
CHRISTINA RAINVILLE IN NOVEMBER OF 1997 FOR THE ABOVE MATTERS OUTLINED
IN STATEMENT NUMBERED
a.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.
M><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM> c. RETALITORY
ACTIONS FOR THE SUBMISSION OF AN AFFIDAVIT TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE
STEWAR DALZALL OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN
DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN 1998 DURING THE COMMONWEALTH OF
PENNSYLVANIA V. LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT
CASE</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@M
AW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVE
RYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AM
MAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MS
OV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN
.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@
<CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>PLEASE WRITE OR TYPE
CLEARLY AND DESCRIBE THE EVENTS IN THE ORDER IN WHICH THEY
HAPPENED.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP
MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>SEE ABOVE
PAGES 2 TO
68</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN
.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></E
OUP01@MSN.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM> <CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLI
PS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END><END><E
COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLA
W.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>IF YOUR COMPLAINT IS BASED ON RACE,
INCLUDE THE RACE OF ALL PERSONS MENTIONED (INCLUDING
YOURSELF).</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP
VERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>IF IT IS A GENDER COMPLAINT, SUPPLY
THE GENDER OF ALL PERSONS MENTIONED,
ETC.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@MS
<AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.CO
M>IF THERE ARE OTHER FACTS YOU FEEL SHOULD BE CONSIDERED, RECORD THEM
ON AN ADDITIONAL SHEET OF PAPER AND INCLUDE THEM WITH THIS COMPLAINT
FORM.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@
COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>SEE DOCUMENT
TITLED
<CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>DEBTOR ANSWER TO
UNITED STATES TRUSTEE'S
<CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>MOTION TO DISMISS OR
CONVERT TO CHAPTER 7; JUNE
AW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>SEE DOCUMENT TITLED
<CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>PLAINTIFFS REPLY TO
FULTON BANKS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR EX PARTE MEETING WITH
THE HONORABLE MARY A. McLaughlin; JUNE
AW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>SEE CD ROM TITLED EXHIBIT
A</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.
M><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>DOCUMENTS OF
INTEREST
OM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>2006 PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT FINDINGS OF
FACTS</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@
RYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>I HEREBY VERIFY THAT THE STATEMENTS
CONTAINED IN THIS COMPLAINT ARE TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY
KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF. I UNDERSTAND THAT FALSE STATEMENTS
HERIN ARE MADE SUBJECT TO THE PENALTIES OF 18 Pa.C.S. 4904, RELATING TO
UNSWORN FALSIFICATION TO
AUTHORITIES.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGRO
Y@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKO
VALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.
N.COM></CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGR
OUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END><END><END><END><END
><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><AMGAUCTIONS@COMCAST.
NET><END><END><END><END><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><COMMENTS@WHIT
EHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROU
P01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMG
ROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AMGROUP01@MSN.CO
IPS.COM><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP0
LLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><END><END>
<END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><END><AMGA
UCTIONS@COMCAST.NET><END><END><END><END><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM
><COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LAVER
YLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>/SJC/ June 27,
OM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>YOUR SIGNATURE
DATE</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@M
AW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVE
RYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV></AM
MAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><AMGROUP01@MS
OV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN
.COM>PLEASE NOTE: YOU MAY NEED TO CONTACT A LAWYER SINCE THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL CANNOT ACT AS YOUR PRIVATE
LAWYER.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01
ERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>As a law enforcement agency, the
primary function of the Attorney General is to represent the public at large by
enforcing laws prohibiting acts of discrimination where there is a pattern or practice
of unlawful activity. Your complaint does remain on file with our office and the
Information contained in it may be used to establish future violations of
Pennsylvania law or other issues of general public
importance.</AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROU
VERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY
@LAVERYLAW.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></COMMENTS@WHITEHOUSE.GOV
></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></END></END></END></END></AMGAUCTIONS@C
OMCAST.NET></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></END></E
OUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><AMGROUP0
1@MSN.COM>REVISED JANUARY
WHITEHOUSE.GO
>
/
CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM></DIV><CMAILBOX@BUYPHILLIPS.COM><
@WHITEHOUSE.GOV><AMGROUP01@MSN.COM><CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW.COM><A
MGROUP01@MSN.COM> </AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></CKOVALY@LAVERYLAW
/END></END></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM></AMGROUP01@MSN.COM>/CMAILBOX
@BUYPHILLIPS.COM
UGI AND PP&L DISPUTES
<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: center">THE FOLLOWING IS HOW I HAVE TO LITIGATE MY
CASES IN FEDERAL AND STATE COURTS COMPUTER AND
ELECTRONICS RENDERED USELESS BY HACKERS & INTRUDERS </DIV>
size=2>2005 HP Desktop Computer
Currently Non-Operational 1. 2 USB
Ports 2. Adobe Professional
Software 3. 4-Camera Color Remote
Sensor Security System 4. MSN
Hotmail 5. Lexmark Printer and
Scanner 6. Dell Printer and
Scanner 7. All Video Converters and
Editors 8. Windows 2000 Operating
System via Boot-Up Sequence July 2, 2008 2005 -
Averatec Laptop Computer Currently Non-Operational 1. Power Supply Will Not Turn On November of
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 2. Software Programs
Compromised 3. Microsoft Outlook
hacked 4. 2 USB
Ports HP
N5150 1999 Laptop Computer - Currently Non-Operational</DIV>
size=2> (Rendered Useless on or
about July 16, 2008; Mouse & Keyboard Will Not Work) 1. Floppy Disc Drive 2. CD-ROM
Writer 3. USB Port for Flash or Thumb
Drive 4. MSN Hotmail 5. Acrobat Professional for creating pdf files. 6. AC Adapter 7. Most if
not all software hacked to perform less than normal 8. Microsoft Word always hacked 9. All computer files and work is technically isolated in the HP
N5150 Laptop with the exception of copying all files and sending them to my own
email account (amgauctions@comcast.net) then going to the public access
computers at the Lancaster County Library on 50 N. Duke Street and copying them
from my email account to my thumb drive. But of course I cannot copy any files
from my thumb drives to my HP N5150 Laptop. Sharp
DVD-Video Player Recorder 1. Will not record
on DVD Discs Must record TV Shows on VHS Video Apple Ipod and 60 GB Hard Drive Back-up Had to secure in safety
deposit box due to hackers Cell Phone Camera Cannot
download photos to computer or printer Kodak Digital Camera Cannot download photos to computer or
printer </DIV>
</DIV>
<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: center">CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING FAMILY AND FINANCIAL
BURDEN </DIV>
size=2>why do you feel it is our
responsibility to support you. I bust my ass working and have a family to raise. I will
help you if you help yourself. Why dont you go out and get a job until the people
who you claim owe you money pay you. Why do you think you are entitled to have
us pay your bills and take care of your financial responsibilities? I have a mortgage
and pay my utility bills as does Steve, and Phil. You are living rent free and its time
you pay your own bills. </DIV>
<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: right">Mike Caterbone Email of March
30, 2008 </DIV>
size=2>Stan thats exactly what I tried to do
but you wouldnt listen. You thought I was trying to steal your house. Stan you need
to get help and get back on your medicine and I know you dont want to hear that
but thats what needs to happen. We are all on your side but you seem to think
everyone is against you and thats not the case. If you would have listen to me back
when they wanted to foreclose on you house things would be
different. </DIV>
<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: right">Mike Caterbone Email of April 3,
2008 </DIV>
</DIV>
size=2>March 31,
FAMILY: Verdana">Stan J.
FAMILY: Verdana">Mike Caterbone 122 Swan
Avenue Plantation, FL
FAMILY: Verdana">Re: Email
from Mike Caterbone of March 31, 2008 PP&L and
UGI Utility Payments Mike, I dont feel it is your responsibility to financially support me, although I do
feel it is your responsibility and your obligation to support the truth and not to be
my adversary. I will outline why it is your responsibility and obligation to pay
attention to what I say, and not to listen to the intentional and malicious rumors
about my activities and what I have been doing for the past 3 years. If you, Mom,
Steve, and Phil had listened to me, instead of taking an adversarial role and always
fighting me on everything, we all would have more money. Instead, you all have
money, while everyone continues to steal and extort money and property from
me. 1. Let me
give you an example. If you would have worked with me, rather than against me,
you could have bought my house for the mortgage owed ($89,000) plus interest
and fees. This could have been before the Sheriff Sale in December of 2006, which
would have been around $165,000 to $250,000. Then, we could have sold it and I
could have paid you somewhere around $10,000. I would have been able to put in
the bank somewhere around $70,000. Remember, on March 13, 2007, just 33 days
after I settled for the $156,000 that was paid at the Sheriff Sale, the house was
transferred for $195,000. All you and Steve did was write me while I was in prison
asking me to give you permission to move all of my belongings from 220 Stone Hill
Road to 1250 Fremont Street.Instead, I only received a check for $17,306.00, by the
way which is still in escrow until all the litigation is legally adjudicated in the courts.
When the Courts reverse the Sheriff Sale, I will most likely have to repay that
money, unless I am awarded damages by that time. 2. Of course, I did not mention that the Sheriff Sale was illegal, the
Superior Court committed obstruction of justice, and everyone that was on that
property before February 1, 2007 were legally trespassing, and I was the only
person with the legal authority to be on that property. That is how they stole all of
my possessions and legal files. 3. Let me
give you another example. In January I told both you and Steve to apply for Energy
Assistance or LIHEAP (Heat Assistance) to pay for the PP&L and UGI bills. I also
applied. Mom and me both received LIHEAP benefits in the past. My last year in
Conestoga, I receive $600 toward my PP&L bills, the year before I received
$300 for part of the year. When I applied in January, the caseworker at the
Lancaster County Assistance Office that accepted my application promised me that I
would receive benefits. Then 2 weeks ago they send me a letter stating that I am
not eligible because the utilities are not in my name and I an not responsible to pay
them. I thought there might be a problem when I applied, that is why I sent Steve
an application and told him to apply. 4. Now, if
you and Steve had listened to me, the PP&L and UGI bills would have been
paid by the Pennsylvania Heat Assistance Fund, which is part of the Department of
Public Welfare. I believe it is federally funded. In addition, both the January
PP&L bill and the UGI bills have been inflated. I formally complained to both
utility companies, but they said Steve or Mom would have to file the complaint. Do
you see the trend here? This conduct is textbook extortion, plain and simple. And it
has been going on for twenty years. 5. Now, let's
talk about what I have been doing for the past 3 years, since January of
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 6. If you will notice in the Document named
"Appeal Exhibits with Employment Applications" and turn to page 41 to 73 you will
find many JOB APPLICATIONS that I have submitted to various companies to get
some work to bring in some income. I have applied to everyone from Turkey Hill and
McDonalds to the City of Lancaster, the County of Lancaster, Smith Barney, Regal
Cinema's, Red Rose Transit Authority and Kunzlers, to name a few of the
applications. Most all of them were submitted in person in 2007. I also sent many
resumes out to try to get some consulting work. So don't tell me that I don't try to
help myself. I was never granted ONE SINGLE INTERVIEW. 7. I also tried to sell all of my unused furniture and appliances on
Craigs List in 2007. All I got were a bunch of people coming to look at it to harass
me, and one person sending me a fraudulent cashiers check that caused a problem
for my Ameritrade Account. 8. Pro Se
Billings. If you review the document titled "Pro Se Sales Journal" you will find my
billings for all of my COURT cases up to August of 2007. I need to include everything
from then until now when I have time. You will find all of my hours listed under "Qty"
for each case. The total amount of billings from 2005 up until August of 2007 is
$284,327.50, and the approximate number of hours that I have spent litigating my
cases is approximately 2,843 hours up until August of 2007. Now that comes out to
approximately 54 40-hour workweeks. All of the entries for billable hours can be
traced to the actual entries listed on the court docket sheets for every case. That
does not include Advanced Media Group work, Project Hope, or the Movie Theater at
Hotel Brunswick, or all the work TRYING TO UNDO THE DAMAGE BY HACKERS, AND
LOOKING FOR FILES THEY DELETED. It also does not include my research work into
mental telepathy and trying to find out who remotely trained me. I currently spend
approximately 50 to 60 hours a week working. <BR style="FONT-
You must also take note that while acting as my own attorney, pro se, I have had 20
criminal charges dismissed against the Lancaster County District Attorney and the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in the last year or so. To date I have had 27
criminal charges dismissed or overturned on appeal. Everyone that I ask tells me
that this has never happened before. And they are all false arrests, which are now
eligible for monetary damages and redress in the court of law. I still have some 4 or
5 appeals to conclude in the appellate courts, then I should have all of my criminal
charges dismissed. The only remaining false charges to clear are a few blatent lies
about driving carelessly, the Fleeing, which should have never been charged, and
two disorderly conducts and harassment charges, all of which are just blatant lies by
corrupt police. The record speaks for itself, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and
the Lancaster County District Attorneys Office has no credibility in the court of law
when it comes to any criminal proceedings v. Stanley J. Caterbone. I have even
documents many cases of the courts changing documents and lying on the record.
However, that is another matter. 10. My Pro
Se Billings do not include hours and time for all of the public meetings that I attend
for the Lancaster Convention Authority or the weekly Lancaster County
Commissioners meetings. It also does not include walking or riding my bike to and
from the Lancaster Courthouse or the Lancaster County Library, or filing complaints
against people stealing and or damaging my property and gasoline or harassing me.
Or all of the time spent trying to document and file complaints for the fraudulent
COURT ORDERS from the LYING JUDGES AND COURT CLERKS. All of this is well
documented. Oh, it also does not include the time spent because all of my
computers are hacked and now I have to use a 9 year old laptop, without a mouse. I
cannot even back up a file to thumb drive without taking an old plastic 1.4
megabyte floppy drive to the Lancaster County Library and copying the files to my
thumb or flash drive. 11. I ALSO BUST MY ASS.
style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> 12. Do you know that in March of 2007 I had
to walk 3/4 of the way home from the office of Noble Real Estate in Akron (a RRTA
Bus Driver purposely drove by without picking me up), after I had a meeting to try
to find out where all of my possessions and files that were stolen from my house at
220 Stone Hill Road were at? They would not tell me a thing, by the way, about who
had my possessions or where they were stored. There was no sign or any indication
that Parula existed except on paper. 13. Now,
Lets talk about my (Advanced Media Group) Downtown Lancaster Action Plan. I have
had real meetings with so many public officials regarding these projects, which all
have supported. They include Mayor Charlie Smithgall; Mayor Rick Gray; Randy
Patterson, Executive Director of the Lancaster City Economic Development Office;
Mike Sturla, Democratic Senior State Legislature; The James Street Improvement
District; Jim Burke, Chief Zoning Officer of the City of Lancaster; and Mark
Easterbrook, Administrator of the County of Lancaster. I also have a signed and
executed Non-Disclosure agreement with Jeff Lefever and his group of investors to
consider my business plan for Excelsior Place. They are currently the owners and
are in the midst of developing the property. 14. I
am currently weeks away (depending on computer hacking) from delivering my
business and development plan for the Downtown Theater at Hotel Brunswick. I
have the Executive Director of the Lancaster Film Commission, Jay Ingram,
considering a partnership with me on this project. My early projections show that I
should be cash flow positive from day one. There is no one that does not think this
is a viable and needed project for Downtown Lancaster. I have amassed research
over the past year and a half or so for this project. My interest and research for
movie theaters goes back to 1987 when I became friends with an elderly man who
was the projectionist for the Stone Harbor Movie Theater and used to let me visit
with him in the projection booth for many discussions regarding my Digital Movie
with Tony Bongiovi and Power Station Studios. I also spent time with Ron Gorganno,
who ran the old Manor Cinemas back when they first opened in the late 1980s or
early 1990s. 15. You must also take note
that the people that owe me money fall into two categories. The one category are
the defendants that I have filed civil complaints against in the court of law. When I
speak of people owing me money, I am not talking about that group of people. I am
talking about people that I have performed services for and was never paid; and
companies that are under contractual obligations such as Harleysville Insurance
Company. Remember, it took me eighteen (18) months to collect all of the money
that I was owed for painting and renovating Moms house here at 1250 Fremont
Street. And I still had to file a claim in court to get that bill paid. The same thing is
happening with Sam Lombardo and Ralph Mazzacchi. I performed services and
billed them $2,000 and they only paid me $300 of it. I am now in court trying to
collect the rest. Harleysville Insurance Company owes me a remaining balance on
my last claim of about $6,000 and they still owe me for a previous claim of about
$7,000 that was never paid at all. This is for property that was damaged or flat out
stolen that I no longer have. Dale High and High Industries still owes me for a past
due invoice that was never paid by American Helix. That outstanding invoice for
services performed now amounts to some $15,000, including interest. I met with
Dale High in May of 2005 and discussed this with him personally; he did not dispute
the invoice. Drew Anthon and the Eden Resort defaulted on my civil complaint, so
the courts have to provide me with a judgment. That claim is another $26,000, and
includes medical bills. The Fulton Bank invoice of some $67,000 is an invoice for the
equity that they have extorted from the illegal sale of my property at 220 Stone Hill
Road, in Conestoga. After settlement in February of 2007, Fulton Bank sent me my
1099 Form for the sale of the property and they even listed the Fair Market Value to
the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) as $250,000. The $250 that the Lancaster County
Treasurer owes me is from the last refund check for criminal charges that were
dismissed that I paid fines on. They sent me a refund check in November of 2007 for
some $600, however, they still owe me another $250.00. 16. This does not include the $750.00 that was stolen by the Police
during the apprehension and fraudulent 302 Commitment to Lancaster General
Hospital on April 5, 2006. 17. This
also does not include the gasoline that has been stolen from my pickup truck over
the last 3 or 4 months. This has to be about $150.00. That does not seam like much,
but when you factor in all the time walking to gas stations to get gas, documenting
and copying receipts every time I get gas, and all of the complaints and meeting
trying to have the Lancaster City Police take incident reports for the stolen gas. It
adds up to a lot of time, money, inconvenience, and an awful lot of pain and
suffering considering I can only put 2 gallons of gasoline in my pickup truck at one
time. Do you know how many times that have stolen my gasoline? Probably in
excess of 30 times. And I believe that Billy (Lefty) Plank and his band of crack heads
have done it on occasion.<BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
let's talk about the State Farm Insurance Claim for my laptop, DVD recorder and
other items that were destroyed here at 1250 Fremont Street. I believe that claim is
for about $1,200. Now, I filed the claim with the home office of State Farm Insurance
in New York. They sent the forms to fill out to Steve and Mom in Miami. What did
Steve do? Refuse to send me the letter and the forms. He just flat out refused to
mail me the forms. I called him in November or December of last year (2007) and
argued with him to send me the forms. I believe it was the last time I had talked to
him. Now that makes no sense. Then in late December, right after Christmas, he
sends me this letter telling me that I will have to pay for the PP&L electric bill
and the UGI gas bill starting in January. 19. I had
forgot to mention that I had already won a cash settlement last September in my
lawsuit against Copy Max, one of the largest office supply retailers in the country, as
a pro se litigant in the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. They used an
attorney from Philadelphia. The law firm has about 60 attorneys, so it was not won
against some attorney from Lancaster.<BR style="FONT-FAMILY:
let's talk about the house and expenses. When Mom first went to Florida to
recuperate from here Heart Stint in December of 2004, everyone thought she was
coming back. Then when I visited Mom in Florida in January of 2005 we discussed
the need to paint and renovate the house incase we had to sell it or rent it. She
agreed whole-heartedly. After I was finished I argued with everyone about getting
someone to rent out 1250 Fremont Street, including Ron Roda. Everyone argued
with me. No one wanted to hear it. My calculations find that I have doubled the
investment that Mom paid me to renovate and paint the house. The realtor that
wanted to sell the house in 2005 only had an offer of $89,000. The house is now
worth at least $105,000. That is what the houses sold for on this block in the past
year. I have also continued to make improvements since then. I put an oriental step
runner on the steps, finished most of the floors, painted the fence, repainted the
bathroom, and repainted some of the living room. In addition, I will do some
painting on the exterior this spring. I also would like to paint the back patio awning,
if you provide the paint. I keep this house maintained and in excellent condition. If I
was not here, the only additional expenses you, Mom, Phil and Steve have are the
UGI Gas utility, the PP&L electric utility and the water and sewer; considering
you did not want to rent the house out. Now if you take into consideration the equity
and the increased value in the house, it is not costing anyone
anything. 21. Now, lets talk about the
money that I owe Mom. First of all the $25,000 was extorted in 1987. I did not spend
that money. That will be paid back when the courts or my defendants settle. The
remaining $14,000 loan in 1998 was also not my fault. I had a signed agreement
with Dave Pflumm that the 1994 Ford Explorer lease was to be paid by Pflumm
Contractors. I made certain, and had Dave sign a document, that in the event that
my employment was terminated or I resigned, the lease would still be paid, along
with my health insurance. The 1994 Ford Explorer deal was done within the month
that I was made to leave by harassment and emotional assaults. I was no fool and
protected myself from having that lease be a financial burden, since things were so
bad. Remember, my Isuzu was paid for and I had no loans on it. He reneged on both
of those agreements. I had been paying Mom a monthly payment for that loan until
2002. So again, that money was technically and legally extorted. And, I should
remind you that in 1999 I tried to convince you to move Moms money from equities
to a fixed income account in her Sun Life Annuity Contract. I had told Lucie Aument
the same thing, along with others that used to come over at Moms for breakfast.
The market went south, and Mom lost some $50,000 of value in her account, which
she never recovered. I have this well documented with my notes and print outs of
her account. 22. Now Mike, in conclusion, you stated in your email I will help
you if you help yourself, I have absolutely proven that I have and keep helping
myself in every way possible. 23. I expect
someone better pay the UGI bill before it is shut-off on April 7th, that is next
Monday, while I have a few meetings to try to get LIHEAP to pay the PP&L
bill. 24. I will also accept all of your other help in
which you refer to in you email. God Bless. Stan J.
style="FONT-FAMILY:
Verdana">www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com </DIV> 
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
<div style="text-align: justify;"><div style="text-align: center;">Mission Statement </div> The Advanced Media Group Ltd., is an information
technologies company which was founded to facilitate the dissemination of
information through the use of sate-of-the-art technologies. Using these technologies we can
improve the quality of great quantities of information by providing a medium in
which information is collected, organized, and delivered in a more effective and
more accurate manner. This will enable vast amount of information to be readily
accessible and easily absorbed. This great improvement in the quality and
accessibility of information will contribute toward a higher standard of living by
allowing society to become more well-informed. The Advanced Media Group Ltd., intends to devote
much of its resources toward improving the information resources available to the
educational community. Interactive technologies and applications developed by the
Advanced Media Group Ltd., will help contribute toward the improvement of the
quality of our educational system. Although the Advanced Media Group Ltd., intends to pursue its
mission aggressively, it will conduct its business with the utmost honesty and
integrity. CD-ROM
Manufacturing Background: The Advanced
Media Group, Ltd., was responsible for developing the CD-ROM division of American
Helix Technology Corporation. The Advanced Media Group, Ltd., currently owns and
operates the division and lias developed a highly 'regarded reputation for quality in
the production of CD-ROM discs. American Helix Technology Corporation provides high quality CD-Audio
and CD-ROM replication services in a state-of-the-art manufacturing facility. The
facility, which was completed in 1988, features a unique third-generation monoline
processing module which was designed and engineered by David D. Dering,
American Helix's founder and president. The facility was designed and engineered
with the objective of increasing manufacturing yields by incorporating quality
control techniques and a high degree of automation into the production
process. The Manufacturing
Process: The manufacturing facility features a 10,000-class
cleanroom for CD preparation and replication operations. Most importantly,
American Helix features an aggressive approach to quality
assurance. Before manufacturing, the master
stamper is passed through three different quality control tests before it is installed
into the injection molding machine. During these tests, the stamper is visually
inspected for surface flaws, and analyzed for strict adherence to the physical media
and data format specifications defined in the Phillips/SONY Red Book and Yellow
Book standards. Utilizing state-of-the-art technology,
American Helix designed its own mono-line replication module. Computer
automated robotics provides above average production yields through increased
efficiency. Most importantly, the robotics technology minimizes the amount of
human contact during production, which increases quality assurance
statistics. 4 &
5 Color Disc Printing (Picture Discs): American Helix is
one of a few CD manufacturing facilities capable of printing the required 4 & 5
Color process for popular "picture" discs. Full color reporductions make the Compact
Disc another means of marketing and advertising for Audio and CD-ROM publishers.
American Helix has recieved awards for its screen printing
technologies. Quality
Assurance: American Helix and the Advanced
Media Group, Ltd., have developed extensive quality assurance procedures and
policies to ensure that the CD-ROM manufacturing process delivers quality
assurance specifications of the highest caliber. The CD-ROM stamper is analyzed by a computerized system that
inspects and evaluates the physical characteristics and the integrity of the data.
Specifications must exceed the SONY/PHILLIPS Red and Yellow Book
Standards. During the replication process,
randomly selected discs are taken from the beginning, the middle and the end of
the process and analyzed on the CD-CATS system. This system is used to inspect
and evaluate the physical characteristics of the actual CD-ROM
discs. After replication, all of the discs are analyzed by our
"AID" analyzer for more than ten different physical flaws. Driven by computerized
robotics, only those discs that pass the prescribed quality assurance specifications
are prepared for printing. Finally, all of the discs are visually inspected for printing flaws before
being packaged and prepared for shipment. Application Development<br style="font-family:
Media Group, Ltd., supports ongoing research and development in the production of
multimedia information applications for a variety of optical platforms. These include
CD-ROM, Compact Disc Interactive (GDI), Intel's Digital Video Interactive (DVI),
Interactive Video Disc (IVD), Laserdisc, and Commodore's Compact Disc Television
(CDTV), Write-Once Read-Many (WORM), Magneto-Optical, as well as conventional
rotating magnetic media. Applications are currently developed for DOS, Macintosh,
Unix, and the Amiga platforms. Windows environments are also supported. Advanced Media Group, Ltd., designs and builds custom user
interfaces and search and retrieval engines for projects which require capabilities
and functionality that are not currently provided by off-the-shelf software
systems. Application
Types: * Multimedia Interactive Educational
Products * Image Management Systems * Point-of-Purchase Interactive Kiosk Displays * Technical Documentation Applications *
Exhibit Technologies * Parts and Service Reference
Applications * Multimedia Interactive Training
Applications Support
Services: * Application Design * Application
Storyboarding * Application Prototyping *
Video Production * Data Conversion
* Media Conversion * Production Prototyping * CD-
ROM Simulation * CDJV Premastering
* CD-Rom Mastering * CD-ROM Replication
* Custom Programming * Desktop
Publishing * End-To-End Printing Educational Applications<br style="font-family:
Media Group, Ltd., has always cited the educational market as its primary area of
interest. However, the market's evolution is challenged by the faltering educational
infrastructure and a lack of financial resources. Fortunately, there is a consortium of
large corporations that feel a real sense of social responsibility and contribute
generously toward improving our educational system. The development of
interactive multimedia technologies for education has become a strong focal point
among companies such as IBM, Xerox, and Lucasfilm as well as others. The Advanced Media Group, Ltd., brings to the interactive
educational multimedia market human resources with extensive experience in
engineering, instructional design, graphics technologies, and courseware
development. These capabilities are coupled with a strong and successful
foundation in the optical publishing industry including the development of
multiplatform authoring systems, a graphics librarian, CD-ROM search engines, and
all phases of CD-ROM production. The Advanced Media Group is currently producing its first CDTV
application, The Stars and You. The educational application is being produced for
children and will take the users through a tour of the universe utilizing full color
photographs, audio, and animation techniques. The application will allow the user to
learn information about the various planets and stars that form our universe, in an
interactive "game" type tutorial. Educational courses designed include: "Composite Materials
Manufacturing", "Accounting Principles", "Teacher Induction Training" and
"Interactive Math 1 & 2" (K-12, 13 & 14) operating on CD-ROM & IVD
concurrently. Commodore CDTV Strategic Alliance The
Advanced Media Group, Ltd., has recently signed a licensing agreement with
Commodore International, Ltd., the West Chester, PA. computer manufacturer. This
strategic alliance is aimed at combining the digital technologies expertise of the
Advanced Media Group,Ltd., with the development of the Commodore CDTV
multimedia machine. The CDTV system was officially introduced at the Consumer
Electronics Show, in Las Vegas this past January. The first shipments were recently
recieved by major retailers on the West coast, in April. CDTV is one of the boldest attempts to date of a computer manufacturer
creating a new consumer electronics medium. CDTV faces stiff competition from
similar products produced by computer manufacturing giants Apple Computer, Inc.,
International Business Machines (IBM), and Tandy Electronics. The CDTV systems
will support "game", reference, and educational applications created by film giants
Lucasfilm and Disney. Mr. Nolan Bushnell, who sold Atari in
1976, is faced with the challenge of effectively integrating the best aspects of
television and computing technologies. The foundation of this emerging
amalgamated technology is built upon the proven, stable CD-ROM and CD-Audio
technologies. The vast storage capacity of CD-ROM coupled with the power of
interactive multimedia applications will allow these systems to have previously
unheard of capabilities. Interactive multimedia applications are available in several
categories including: education; entertainment; reference; arts; and
music. However, the
most unique feature of CDTV is its compactness. The complete CDTV system is no
larger than a conventional CD-Audio player. It can be connected to virtually an TV
monitor and is completely self-contained. Unlike CD-ROM, it does not require a
connection to a personal computer. The system employs a simple yet elegant
infrared remote control interface and it can be integrated into an entertainment
system which can play both CDTV and CD-Audio discs. This will make it the first
system to bridge the personal computer and consumer electronics markets.
Surprisingly, the CDTV system is to be reasonably priced at under
$1,000. <br style="font-family:
Media Group, Ltd., manufactured the first CD-ROM disc for Commodore International
Ltd., more than a year ago and the Advanced Media Group, Ltd., has continued
supporting Commodore during the early development of the CDTV system. This licensing agreement will establish the Advanced Media
Group, Ltd., as one of the CDTV premastering sites. Because the CDTV operating
system is proprietary, all applications developed for the systems will require that
the applications be processed utilizing the Commodore ISO 9660 formatting
software. In addition to premastering services, the Advanced Media Group, Ltd., will
also provide end-to-end manufacturing of CDTV discs, and will develop a library of
CDTV applications for the Educational and Scientific
Community. CD-Diagnostics Software CD-DIAGNOSTICS
is a unique software utility package developed by the Advanced Media Group, Ltd.,
to aid in the installation and maintenance of CD-ROM drives. The package is used
extensively by libraries and organizations which need to administer and maintain
multiple CD-ROM drives. The Advanced Media Group, Ltd., has marketed the
software worldwide and it is currently in use in S. Africa, England, Italy, Spain; Brazil,
Canada, Australia, Austria, and Saudi Arabia, as well as the United States. The following is brief
description of the functions performed by CD-DIAGNOSTICS: Live communication test - this utility checks all hardware and software
interfaces between the computer and the drive. Drive compatibility test - analyzes special hardware and software
features supported by the system. Access time test -
measures track latency, access time and data transfer rate. Disc data verification - displays a graphical map of disc sectors and
performs read-test disc verification. Audio play utility -
allows the user to select and play specified audio tracks on CD-audio discs on audio-
capable drives. CD-DIAGNOSTICS SELLS FOR $
69.99 PARTIAL LIST OF
PROJECTS Donnelly Geo Systems (Mapquest) Joint Venture Multimedia
Applications for Distribution; American Helix Technology Corporation Sale of
Facility Mansco,
Inc. Replication Paper to CD ROM National Assoc Of Watch & Clock -
Multimedia Application For Exhibit Parsons & Brinkerhoff Engineers - Develop
Technical Application Ford New
Holland - Replication Corporate Records to CD ROM Mobil Oil, Inc. - Multimedia
Legal Documentation To CD-ROM Indiana Bell - Multimedia Application For
Distribution Congressional Info Systems - CD-DIAGNOSTICS, Manufacturing For
Archiving Microsoft, Inc
- CD-DIAGNOSTICS Licensing Agreement 10,000 Plus
Users Bell
Atlantic - Multimedia Application For Distribution Tandy Electronics, Inc -
Multimedia Application For Catalogue and Distribution Exxon Research And
Production - Multimedia Application For Engineering/Archiving; Valdez Oil
Spill Convert 40 Million Documents to CD-ROM Compaq, Inc - CD-DIAGNOSTICS Licensing
Agreement 3,000 to 6,000 Users Ipsoa - CD-DIAGNOSTICS License 8,000
Users Veda, Inc.
- Air Force Tech Documents For Distribution Cbis, Inc - Authoring
Software Library Of
Congress - Manufacturing Paper to CD ROM Commodore Business Machines,
Inc - Joint Venture Replication of CDTV, Multimedia Application
Development Amp, Inc (Tandy Corporation) - Replication Corporate Records
& Parts Catalogue to CD ROM U. S. Postal Service - Manufacturing Corporate
Records to CD ROM Arthur Anderson Replication & Application
Development At&T / Data Dev. - Replication of 200,000
Images Bancroft And
Whintney - Replication 965,000 Pages California Legal
Statutes National Institute Of Standards And Technology
Replication & Technical Application for Speech Recognition
Software American Bankers
Association Replication and Application of Compliance Manuals
style="font-family: Verdana;">Pa Blue Shield
- Develop KIOSK System of Multimedia Project For
Marketing American Bond Buyers - Convert over 1 Million Financial Documents
with Search and Retrieval System Including Hardware HEARST Publications -
Catalogue To CD-ROM Bid Due Out 06/05/90 "Good Things" @
Us Product KIOSK Systems NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Replication of Technical
Specifications Defense Mapping Agency (DMA) of Department of Defense
Convert Maps of Iraq for Dessert Storm & Middle East to CD-
ROM Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA) Replication and Convert Administrative Manuals
to CD-ROM National Institute of Standards
& Technology (NIST)/Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)
- Replication & Project
Development Speech Recognition Software Gallo Rosso Restuarant - Management/Technology
Consulting Mazzi Restuarant -
Management/Technology Consulting B2B
Communications - Management/Technology Consulting Pflumm Contractors - Management/Technology
Consulting The Jay Group -
Management/Technology Consulting Lancaster Container - Management/Technology
Consulting American Helix Technology
Corporation/High Industries - Management Consulting Cross Microwave - Management/Technology
Consulting S.N.Lombardo Development
- Management/Technology Consulting AIM Mutual Funds (Wholesaler Division) - Management/Technology
Consulting Sprecher Management (Excelsior
Place) - Management/Technology Consulting Project Hope/Contact One - Technology
Consulting Power Station Studios -
Management/Technology Consulting <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"><div
style="text-align: center; font-weight: bold;">ADVANCED MEDIA
GROUP/HIGH INDUSTRIES RECAPITALIZATION PLAN (Advanced Media Group Authored
& Consulted On This Plan) </div> To build a profitable company geared toward the design and
implementation of products and services for the high-end delivery of
information. <br style="font-
following objectives must also be achieved: Attract outside equity dollars for the
capitalization of the company. Return to American Helix, approximately 300K of the
600K used to initially fund the Advanced Media Group. American Helix maintains an
equity interest in the new company. Eliminate future financial liability to American
Helix. Resolve the LASERTEX issue. OVERVIEW: It has
become more and more apparent, that the need for a Full Service Multimedia
Publishing Company is needed now more than ever, and that this need will continue
to grow as delivery systems become more widely distributed. (More concrete
evidence of this will be included in the business plan.) The major reason this need
exists is the extreme high cost in technical personnel and equipment to carry such a
group within an organization. The only alternative has been to network with other
companies. Networking
can create other problems, especially for a company that possesses very few of the
necessary skills in house. Problems like losing control of the client, higher costs due
to the combined profit margins of the different companies, and the potential lose of
those capabilities. An alternative to this, is to establish a Consortium of talent to
draw from for the completion of projects, where the Consortium has an on going
interest in the evolution of the company. Many relationships have already been
established that can be strengthened through a more formalized arrangement.
Other relationships need to be established that will give the group additional
capabilities in target areas. MARKETING: We need
to capitalize on American Helix existing image of a creative forward thinking
company by focusing on project development work that requires a higher level of
creative design and implementation. At the same time grow that image through the
efforts of the consortium to establish an aura of unparalleled excellence in the
industry. One of my largest hurdles to overcome has been the reluctance of
potential clients to do business with a young company, that has no track record in
completing CDROM projects. This hurdle is only starting to be minimized by the
relationships with companies and individuals that are producing demos geared
specifically towards our clients needs or particular project, for no cash up front. By
drawing these companies in closer to us in a more structured relationship we will be
able to use their past successes to eliminate the fear a potential client has in doing
business with us. We need to put together a portfolio of products that were
produced by the group. This portfolio should consist of a number of different
delivery mediums, ie. CD-ROM, Video, Laser video Disc, Print, Exhibits, DVI, etc.
Part of that portfolio should consist of a high impact capabilities presentation on
video by the existing consortium of talent to introduce the concept. We need not
limit ourselves solely to the CDROM markets. The demo, by focusing not only on
the technology and the achievements of the existing members of the consortium,
will open up brand new markets at a fraction of what it would cost to bring all of the
necessary expertise in house. Projects that utilize Laser video Disc Technology, DVI, Television,
Radio, Videos, Exhibits, as well as Print advertising. As CDROM moves more into
the multimedia arena, all of these areas of expertise will be necessary. By building
a consortium of talent to draw from for CDROM, we are also able to produce
product for people in any one of these specific areas. We already have the portfolio
started with the Yellowman Video and some CDROM application demos as well as
some of the CDROM discs that we produced. As we bring people into the group,
the portfolio will grow rapidly by including the groups past successes. A portfolio of
this magnitude should be unparalleled in any industry and should eliminate any
fears a potential client may have in dealing with a young company. Armed with a
portfolio like this, sales people would be easy to attract that would work for a
straight commission or draw against commission. Sales people could be recruited
from each of the target markets to capitalize on their knowledge of each of their
respective industries. They would now be entering a company to make a sale with
more capabilities than they could have ever imagined and at the same time
broaden their potential customer base. By having the sales people work on
commission, the cost of sales will be much easier to control and would reduce the
financial exposure to the company. Some specific target markets interested in the high end delivery
of information are: Large and small corporations for interactive training programs as well
as manipulating large amounts of data Museums for
exhibits Advertising agencies to produce product for their
clients Government agencies for contracts to manipulate
large amounts of data as well as interactive training programs Retrieval Software companies that do not have multimedia
capabilities Companies that exhibit at trade
shows need Exhibits. Interactive Exhibits are more dynamic, especially in industries not
associated with CDROM or multimedia. Publishers of Educational Materials are
looking to publish products in a more interactive way. Studies are being done that
show children learn faster and retain more when they interact with the delivery
medium. This list does not focus on any one particular industry. The delivery of
information reaches across almost every industry. Just about anything that involves
a transfer of information can be enhanced and become more effective by using a
multiple of mediums, and by having the target audience participate in the process.
This one sentence is the primary reason for the incredible excitement surrounding
this industry. The cost effectiveness of CDROM is secondary. The cost
effectiveness of CDROM is responsible for most of the growth rate, but the
blending of mediums is what is responsible for the excitement. This is important to
understand because it is not necessary to limit your markets. The process to
produce an interactive training program is virtually identical to produce an
interactive exhibit, educational program or an advertising kiosk. They all involve
the transfer of information. The clients are out there. They are around every corner
and under every stone you turn over. The only way to close a sale in this business
is to demonstrate your capabilities. The key word there is demonstrated. We are working in an area
that is very new and very expensive. When you are trying to close a sale for a
printing job, everyone assumes you know how to print. The criteria for getting the
job are different for multimedia, interactive programs. When a company is
considering spending possibly hundreds of thousands of dollars on a production,
they need to feel comfortable with the producers expertise. These fears are much
easier to deal with by demonstrating the skills of the
Consortium. We also
need to gain exposure by presenting the technology, (NOT THE CONCEPT) at
industry and/or non-industry functions, utilizing the technology in presentations that
are consistent with the goals of the group. Typically technology presentations are
either boring or they are dealing with a technology that cannot be utilized at this
time. We need to focus on the technology that can be utilized, but demonstrate the
additional creativity brought by the group that does not come simply by purchasing
technology. ORGANIZATION: THE COMPANY Chief Financial
Officer would be Jim Tritch. Jim's responsibilities would be to establish the financial
reporting procedures that the company would operate under as well certain
operational procedures. With Jim's background and expertise, the investor will feel
comfortable that the financial aspects of the company are under prudent
management. President: The president of the company would
be Scott Robertson. Scott's responsibilities would be to follow the reporting and
operational procedures outlined by Jim as well as to establish the consortium and
the relationships of the participating members. All arrangements with the members
would be subject to the approval of Jim Tritch. In addition to myself, I would need
one other salaried person (25K30K) that would be responsible for the daily
accounting functions of the company. All sales people would be straight
commission. As the company grows there may be a need for a sales manager but it
would be my preference that this person would work on a commission override
structure. (A more detailed definition of responsibilities would be included in the
business plan.) BOARD OF DIRECTORS: The Board of Directors
would have five seats, to be comprised of Jim Tritch as chairman, Scott Robertson,
two seats for the investor and one seat to represent the consortium, which would be
established through a vote by the members of the consortium. THE CONSORTIUM: Below are a few of the companies and/or
individuals, along with their respective areas of expertise that could be brought to
the group. Although most of these people__A__are working with us in one
capacity or another, before a more formalized arrangement could be made, a much
more extensive background check would be necessary. Esscomp: Skip Langley & Wayne Landis Esscomp is a
company that writes software and has a full text search engine with retrieval time
and size capabilities that are far above industry standards. Esscomp's capabilities
are geared towards the indexing and retrieval of large amounts of data which is
important to large corporations and government organizations. Dering Musser de Nooijer: Dering Musser de Nooijer is a
design company recently formed by Jeff Dering, Jerry Musser, and de Nooijer that
can show capabilities in creative design and interactive exhibits. The people
involved in this organization are largely responsible for the image that American
Helix currently has in the market as a progressive, forward thinking company. This
image is probably one of the more valuable assets the Advanced Media Group
possess at this time. Jeff Dering has just recently left National Geographic where he
was responsible for the creation and construction of Explorers Hall, an interactive
exhibit in Washington, DC. Through his activities at National Geographic, Jeff has
been exposed to and worked with a number of different individuals and companies
that could be very valuable additions to the Advanced Media Group. This company
is also responsible for the creation of the Yellowman Video which was produced for
us as well as the printed brochures and literature we distribute. Many of the
materials produced for us, by this organization, have won national and international
awards. Sandra Morris: Sandra Morris, currently with
Intel, has indicated she will be leaving Intel in the near future. Sandra has been
approached by a number of companies to produce DVI products for them. She has
a background in education and more recently has been the focal point for much of
Intels effort in recruiting DVI developers for what Intel and many other people
believe will become the standard in full motion video for computers. Sandra has
maintained a very high profile in the industry. She regularly speaks at many of the
industry shows, and has a very good reputation. An executive committee needs to be established
which would be made up of members of the respective groups as well as from the
company. This committee would be responsible for reviewing and advising on
potential jobs, establishing a project manager for each job, reviewing the progress
on each job as well as monitoring costs for work performed by the members to
protect against overcharging for work performed. This committee would also have a hand in the
direction of marketing and advertising dollars budgeted for the
group. until a full
business plan is written and a pro forma produced, I can't say exactly what the start
up expense would be. I would estimate that $1,500,000 would need to be raised.
This should accomplish the goal of returning $300,000 to American Helix and still
leave adequate operating capital. The structure of the company would be very lean
and mean. Most of the expenses would be controllable through a commission
structure. The goal on projects would be to achieve between a 5% to 20% margin
depending on the size of the project. The consortium should have an equity interest
(to be determined) in the company. Their equity could be established a number of
different ways. The simplest, would be for them to purchase stock. This is also
harder to achieve. Another alternative would be to have a percentage of their
earnings go towards the purchase of stock. This is a more viable alternative that
should be explored in more detail. Another alternative could be that the groups
stock would vest over a period of time. Each of these alternatives carry with them
advantages and disadvantages for both the members of the group and the
company. Probably the best alternative will be a hybrid of the three options just
mentioned. Regardless
of how we decide to achieve equity ownership for the members, it is very important
that this be a part of the plan. Obviously we would want the members to place the
needs of the group over the needs of the individual. This, for the most part goes
against human nature. Having an equity interest in the company will help promote
the concept of "the needs of the many out weighing the needs of the one". There
are a number of other factors that can help to promote this concept. One of those
would be to target companies or individuals for the group that do not have a long
history of working for themselves and are interested in the sense of security that
working with a group provides. We are fortunate that the existing target members
meet that criteria. A possible breakdown of equity could be as follows:
Verdana;"> Raise 1.5
million paying 300K back to American Helix Investor (1.5 Million 70% AH 300K 20%
Consortium 10%. It would probably be a good idea to structure some type of option
for the Consortium to increase equity ownership. LASERTEX
ISSUE: We have a relationship with Network Technology. It is not a good
relationship, but never the less it exists. We need to figure out how to get the most
out of it. There are two possible primary paths this relationship could go. Either
Tom will work with us to complete LASERTEX or we will figure out the most
beneficial way to terminate the relationship. Either way it is imperative that we deal
with Tom from a position of strength and that we exercise much more control over
the future path of the relationship. We are able to do this now that we have
officially put Tom on notice and are exercising our rights under the contract. We
have sufficient documentation to substantiate our allegations and proof that we
held up our end of the contract. Even though I personally feel betrayed by the
confidence and trust I placed in Tom, I doubt that he manipulated this situation
simply to scam over $275,000 from us. I believe this is more situation where Tom
got in over his head and his ego is making some very bad decisions for him with
very little regard how it affects other people other businesses or even the long term
effect on his own business. We also can not assume that this entire arrangement
was not a scam. As we try to fix the situation, all possibilities must be considered
and carefully weighted. I think a trip to Washington to meet with Tom, so a better
assessment of the situation can be made, would be the most prudent action at this
time. Without good lines of communication, the problem can not be resolved, and
could only get worse. TIME LINE Upon the
approval to go ahead, it would take one week to complete a full written business
plan. To attract the equity investment for the company it would be advantageous to
have a few or all of the members commitment to the group. This would enable us
to demonstrate the full capabilities to the potential investor. I would estimate that
this could be completed in another two weeks (possibly less). The time needed to
complete the funding of the company is a little more difficult to estimate. Utilizing
the presentation skills that we would possess as well as the past performance of the
members, coupled with the existing excitement surrounding the industry, I believe I
could have this company funded in record time. <hr
Verdana;">Date: June 18, 1990 From: Stan
Caterbone To: Dave Shirk, David
Dering Subject:
Government Bids for CD-ROM Premastering, Mastering, &
Replication Summary:
In order to receive the considerations necessary to win any of the many government
projects utilizing CD-ROM, it is necessary to prepare a very detailed, methodical,
and concise bid proposal. These proposals are intended to define all processes,
procedures, and most importantly quality assurance controls. A "Statement of
Work" from the NASA Solicitation RFP5-76373/206 is attached for your
reference. There
are 5 (five) primary processes that must be described in a technical proposal that
will demonstrate an overall understanding of the requirements necessary to deliver
a CD-ROM. According to the "technical approach", and in accordance with all
technical specifications cited, the following processes must be
defined: 1.
Premastering/DMI-Stan Caterbone 2. Mastering/DMI-Stan
size="2"> 3. Replication/David
Dering 4. Quality Assurance/Dave Shirk-Beth Eller-
David Dering 5. File Validation/DMI-
Stan Caterbone Plan of Action: The
importance of the lack of this information has already cost us the opportunity to bid
on a $60,000 plus contract with NASA. There are other government bids that I am
preparing that must be delivered next week. We only have to prepare this
information one time, and then only the pricing/cost proposals will need to be added
for future government contracts. This information will also help me to market CD-
ROM Replication services in the commercial market as well. In order to complete this task as
efficiently as possible, and with information that will insure our success in
government bids, I have prepared an "INFORMATION QUESTIONNAIRE" for each
individual according to the primary process. Due Date: Each
person is asked to complete the required questionnaire and deliver it by Friday, June
22, 1990. I will be
available for consultation, and will review the information on Thursday. I thank you
for your cooperation regarding this matter. PREMASTERING
- 1.Accepted Media 
2.Hardware Configuration/Specifications 4. Validation
Process (Files vs. CD-ROM Image) MASTERING 1. Media Used 2. Equipment
Used 3. Quality Control Procedures 4.Shipping Procedures REPLICATION - 1.Injection Molding Process & Procedures 2.Metalizing Process QUALITY CONTROL
PROCEDURES 1. Process to Verify
Stamper 2. CD-CATS Analysis, (Parameters that are
analyzed) 3. CD-ANALYZER, (Parameters that are analyzed
after injection molding) 4. Manual Inspection process of
Printing, and flaws. CD-ROM vs. ORIGINAL DATA
FILES 1. Process to validate file transfer to CD-ROM
image file format. <hr
Verdana;">January 25, 1991 Barry J. Glick Donnelley
Geosystems 53 West James
Street Lancaster, PA 17604 Dear Barry: As per our previous conversation,
Allon Lefever, Chairman of the Board, of American Helix, and Vice President of High
Industries, will be awaiting a call from a Donnelly representative regarding our
discussions. In order to
facilitate a fair and equitable discussion pertaining to American Helix (Sale of
American Helix to R.R. Donnelly), please advise your personnel that High Industries
are open to any and all discussions regarding the business at hand. Also, it would
be in the best interest of all parties, if your personnel refrained from disclosing any
and all information that I may have disclosed during our discussions. High
Industries should be given the opportunity to represent and disclose such
information. I, of course
will be available to discuss my knowledge of the CD-ROM business, and or the
American Helix operations at large. Allon Lefever can be contacted at 293-4444. I would like to continue our
discussions, and would ask to visit with you next week, schedule permitting, to take
a look at your specific operations, systems, and technologies, as we
discussed. I can be
reached at the numbers below, or my lab at 392-6533. I look forward to continuing or
discussions. Regards, Stan J. Caterbone,
Director <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"><div
style="text-align: center;">1991 IC MASTER CD-ROM
PROJECT REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL </div> A. GENERAL
INFORMATION. Vendor's name, nature of business organization (eg. public
corporation, etc.), date business began, ownership status, location of headquarters
and other principal offices, domicile of parent company and majority ownership,
names of principal officers, number of employees, description of business
operations, and detailed description of plant facilities and resident hardware used in
performance of services rendered. American Helix Technology Corporation 1857 Colonial Village Lane Lancaster,
PA 17601 (717) 392-7840 (717) 392-7897
(FAX) (800) 525-6575 American Helix provides services for the CD
technology industries. The state-of-the-art CD manufacturing facility was completed
in December of 1988. The facility features a unique 3rd generation monoline
processing module, designed and engineered by David D. Dering, founder and
president. This extremely automated facility was designed and engineered with
the objective of increasing manufacturing yields through increased performances
and yields of all quality assurance standards. The facility manufactures both CD-
AUDIO AND CD-ROM discs. The Advanced Media Group, LTD., services the information
technologies industries. These activities include CD-ROM premastering, mastering,
and replication; CD-ROM project development, Data preparations and conversions;
exhibit technologies, and system integrations, and customized software
development. <br style="font-
American Helix was funded by High Industries, Inc., of Lancaster in 1987. As
a wholly owned subsidiary of the High companies, American Helix is joined by more
than 40 other companies managed and operated by the $250 million a year
conglomerate. High Industries, Inc., currently serves the steel, precast/prestressed
concrete, and commercial/industrial construction industries; as well as operating in
industrial, commercial, and residential real estate, cable TV, food services,
management consulting and development, hospitality services, communications
and other related services. High Industries, Inc., is a Pennsylvania corporation owned by the family
of Sanford High, whose father built the steel and industrial conglomerate from a
welding shop in 1931. In 1977 Sanford relinquished the reigns to his two sons,
Calvin and Dale. High Industries employees more than 1200 workers in the
Corporate Center alone. American Helix is situated in the 500 acre Greenfield Corporate Center.
Graced with aesthetically pleasing architecture, beautiful landscaping, broad
walkways, fountains, and ponds, American Helix contrasts the contemporary rural
setting with its illuminating high-tech interior design. The Advanced Media Group,
LTD., also operates a marketing office in downtown Washington, D. C., close to the
highly developed corporate and government markets. American Helix employees over
40 workers in its headquarters and manufacturing facility. In the first quarter of
1990, the company completed its first expansion, which doubled the output
capacity if the plant. American Helix has the ability to produce more than 3.6
million CD'S per year. Plans are now being finalized for another expansion, which
will again double its output. The main features of the manufacturing facility are the exceptionally
high yields, resulting from the performance of its proprietary injection-molding
module. Increased performance results from high quality assurance techniques,
employed by the sophisticated automated production process. American Helix also
features the ability to produce 5 color disc printing, only available in a few U.S.
facilities. The
Advanced Media Group, LTD., (AMG) serves the information technologies business.
The services include end to end production of optical publishing applications,
including CD-ROM applications. AMG features a compression technology that is
used in its retrieval system providing extended capacities and speedier retrievals.
AMG will provide CD-ROM storyboard and prototype applications, used to help win
budget approval and support the key decision making process. Data preparation
and data conversion services are also provided for all projects and
applications. The
facility features the following equipment used in the operation of the above-
described businesses. AMERICAN HELIX TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
F
CILITY) CINCINNATI MILICRON PRIMARY PROCESS
MODULE CONVAC METALIZER ADEPT ROBOTICS SYSTEMS DIGITAL
INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS CORPORATION SP-2 STAMPER-
ANALYZER CD-CATS SA2 CD
size="2"> AID SYSTEM
size="2"> SONY DMR
style="font-family: Verdana;"> SONY RECORDER DISC MANUFACTURING INC.,
(FACILITY) NOVELL ETHERNET
NETWORK OMI/TOPIX & MERIDIAN
PREMASTERING SYSTEM ZUMAS-XABITE/OMI BACKUP
SYSTEMS APLLE/MACII PLUS SSCI
INTERFACE DMI MASTERING
SYSTEM PHILLIPS UNIVERSAL MASTER GLASS
SYSTEM PLAYER ANALYZER B. CLIENT LIST. A representative list of clients for whom CD-ROM
prepatory work similar to that requested herein has been performed, including all
publishers of information for the electronics industry, if any, which may complete
with Hearst. Arthur
Anderson & Company Amp, Inc. Commodore Business Machines Bell
Atlantic Advanced Systems Development,
Inc. Network Technologies, Inc. C. DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS of interest with regard to
"B". NONE
APPLICABLE D. VENDOR'S PERSONNEL AND QUALIFICATION STATEMENT, if
not contained in "A". DAVID D.
DERING, PRESIDENT - Accumulated more than 15 years experience as an
engineer in injection molding technology. Previously was director of operations for
MXL Industries, a manufacturer of custom optical lenses. In the past he developed,
designed and produced products for the Navy and Aerospace industry. Designed
and developed the injection molding module of the CD manufacturing processes,
and manufacturing facility at large. Mr. Dering has a Patent Pending on the CD
manufacturing process and is currently finalizing agreements with Cincinnati
Milacron to market the modules for the industry at large. JAMES BOYER, VICE PRESIDENT - Established himself as one of the
leading audio engineers over a career that spanned 20 years. Demonstrated an in
depth knowledge and expertise for audio and video engineering, production, and
recording. Produced the first commercially released CD-AUDIO, for Billy Joel.
Developed a list of Who's Who in contemporary music as clients for his engineering
and recording business. Jim provides a diverse range of technical expertise in
the. MIKE DILLINGHAM,
PRODUCTION CONTROL MANAGER - Acquired 13 years of experience in the
distribution and production areas of the recording industry. Prior to American Helix,
managed the distribution and warehousing efforts of ELECTROSOUND GROUP, INC.,
a national recording company. Mike also served in similar capacities with ASR and
POLYGRAM recording companies. JOE LIANTONIO, QUALITY
CONTROL TECHNICIAN, SYSTEMS ANALYST - Previously employed by
FERRANTI DEFENSE SYSTEMS, INC., an International Defense Contractor, as a
systems engineer. Performed various engineering and testing functions for
hardware, software and integrated systems for radar and tracking systems.
Experienced technical writer with working knowledge of military specifications.
Responsible for performing and analyzing post production Acceptance Testing for
final production approval for various products. 
DAVE SHIRK, QC/PREMASTERING TECHNICIAN - Attended McCure
Audio and Visual Recording Institute. Previously employed by several recording and
production companies in various engineering capacities. Also contains a working
experience of electronic engineering. Experienced in analyzing and inspecting
recorded media for specifications and bench mark analysis for quality assurance
standards. BETH ELLER, MANUFACTURING
ENGINEER - Employed in the in the injection molding industry for the last
12 years. Developed systems for the finishing, polishing, and coating technologies
in injection molding applications. Beth is responsible for the state-of-the-art printing
processes employed for the CD disc manufacturing. 
GLEAN GALLANT, PRIMARY PROCESS TECHNICIAN - Performed
various engineering duties and responsibilities in the injection molding industry
during the last 10 years. Contributed to the design of the primary process module
and was instrumental in building the manufacturing systems for American Helix.
Provides an in depth expertise to the production and manufacturing equipment,
systems, and operations of the Primary Process. STAN
CATERBONE, DIRECTOR, OPTICAL PUBLISHING -Developed the CD-ROM
business for American Helix/Advanced Media Group, LTD., Previous background in
computer technologies. Former founder and principal of a Financial Services
organization, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, LTD., raising over $80 million of
capital per year. Designed and developed state-of-the-art information technology
systems for the company. Combines a developed sense of entrepreneurial spirit
with past education, training, and experience of computer and information
technologies. TOM BROWN, OPTICAL PUBLISHING
SOFTWARE/SYSTEMS ENGINEER (RETAINED BY AMERICAN HELIX) -
Developed over 50 CD-ROM projects since 1987. Has been authoring commercial
software over the past 8 years, including projects with UNISYS and NATIONAL
SEMICONDUCTOR. Was manager of SHAPE OPTIMEDIA CD-ROM division. Authored
CD-DIAGNOSTICS, a software program for installing and maintaining CD-ROM
drives. MALCOM LANGLEY (ESSCOMP), SOFTWARE DEVELOPER -
Designed
and developed a full text retrieval engine that is on the leading edge of technology
in relation to current performance standards. This engine was developed to handle
CD ROM size databases (670 megabytes or larger). The philosophy behind the
technology is simple, the data is compressed onto the CD ROM disk and then it is
decompressed in the PC's memory before displaying to the screen.
Verdana;"> Mr. Langley
has been actively involved with computers since 1974, starting with self assembled
(6800, 8080 and Z80 CPU) systems. He has also been involved with electronics
since his childhood, including 2 years with the Army Signal Corps doing radio and
teletype repair. As a hobbyist amateur radio, TV repair, and calibration
laboratory. <br style="font-
Programmed the software and maintained the systems to do invoicing,
accounts receivable, general ledger and historical analysis for Association of
Maryland Pilots using proprietary Prodigy Systems software. The systems processed
4,000 to 8,000 ships annually and $8 to $14 million in revenue. WAYNE LANDIS, SYSTEMS ENGINEER (ESSCOMP) - Over
7 years experience with Naval supply and procurement Automated Data Processing
(ADP) systems design, implementation, operations and supervision. This position
was in the information center providing support to 435 end users with a 1.4 billion
dollar budget and over 72,000 contracts per year. Developed a database and then produced 95,000
barcoded labels. Developed a plan to backfit the procurement folders with the
barcoded labels. Designed a tracking and barcode wand update system, via 3270
input into the IBM 3090/600 mainframe computer. This system utilized mainframe
FOCUS for data capture and storage with nightly update of the Navy IDMS master
database. Over
5 years on the BREAKOUT/COMPETITION ADVOCATE PROGRAM. Developed the
BREAKOUT HIT LIST. This list provides vendors with the parts the Navy has procured
over the last five years with quantity and the last price payed) divided by sole
source or full competitive items. Developed the Competition advocate picture catalog. This book
provides a picture of items that the government has problems finding vendors to
produce. (Some reasons are the specification are written in military jargon or the
drawing is not available.) The driving factor of the catalog is to find a vender to
reverse engineer the part. Developed and implemented
the BREAKOUT tracking system of the 10,000 items reviewed yearly.
Verdana;"> Worked with
PARTMASTER (NSA) to develop CD ROM application with 12,500,000 part
number/military number cross reference. Any item is crossed and displayed on the
screen of an 8088 type PC in less than 6 seconds. Beta test site for IBM 3363 WORM drive. This
involved 9 months of optical disk image storage and retrieval systems testing with
50% increase in data transfer speed. Developed the Navy color picture database of
parts. Worked for
Advanced Technology Inc. as a Senior System Analyst and ran the Camp Hill satellite
office. Provided support on the LM2500 Marine Gas Turbine Project.
Verdana;"> Developed a
database to track all serial numbered gas turbines and which ship they were
installed on. This database was then used to schedule ECP and overhaul schedules.
Verdana;"> Bid four
major RFP's on the BREAKOUT program each proposal had two teaming
partners. E. PROPOSED "FORM OF AGREEMENT"
representative of vendor's terms and conditions including: 1. Details as to Copyright and
ownership of Software and precise language as to warranty and
indemnification in cases of their party claims of patent, copyright or trade secret
violation. Ownership
and Copyright - ESSCOMP, Inc. (MALCOM LANGLEY) 19841
Greystone Road Whitehall, MD
21161 2. Details as to License provisions and requirements in use of
Software. License to
Hearst as Required. 3. Details as to Software
functional and performance capaility. Software will perform and function on IBM PC's to
requirements of HEARST Specifications. Given the limited amount of information
available at this time with regards to the specifications, the software can be
expected to display any screen display upon the enter key depression for a period
not to exceed 30 seconds. Seldom will any display take more than 3 seconds, and
more than 50% of the screens are expected to display in 0.6
seconds. 4. Details as to CD-ROM mastering and
replication. Hearst will be required to deliver 9
Track, 8MM, or Dat Media of the CD-ROM physical image file to American Helix.
Hearst will also be required to deliver corresponding art proofs for disc printing,
inserts, and any other related materials. American Helix will verify both the CD-ROM media and the
corresponding art proofs for acceptance. Upon the premastering and mastering, American Helix will
validate the formatted CD-ROM image file containing the ISO 9660 format against
the original files. The SP-2 is a comprehensive computer test system that monitors
Sony/Phillips red book data parameters such as BLER, BRST, UNCR errors on a per
second basis as well as 10 sec., total error count and average error count of the
entire stamper surface. I3 and I11 voltage measurements are taken (per sec.) as
well as drop out detection, Symmetry, Peak to Peak, Radial Noise, and Crosstalk (on
track). All measurements are monitored to be well within spec of Sony/Phillips Red
Book. A printout of this test is made and stored in the customer file as well as on the
SP-2 hard drive for future reference. Upon verification, American Helix will begin production of the
CD-ROM discs. 100% of all CD-ROM discs will be automatically inspected on the AID
Computerized Analyzer for data integrity, physical characteristics, and performance.
Verdana;"> The AID
System will inspect the CD for any physical defects or errors that may have
occurred in the molding process. The system also checks for Birefringence, The
inner and outer Eccentricity, Reflectivity level, and Warp level of the substrate. The
4 main reject areas on this system are Surface Flaws, Pinholes and Missing Data,
Dense Flaws, and Track Flaws, each having a separate and different threshold (size
and level) for rejection. 5. Details as to maintenance
provisions and capability to provide customized changes to
Software. Maintenance to be provided in full for one
year. 6. Details as to deliverabiltiy including
documentation and technical detail. ESSCOMP has full
capability to customize to your request. Providing documentation and technical
detail to CD-ROM is suggested for considerations. 7. Details as to costs and
basis for billing to Hearst for use of Software. Upon
review of final specifications, a royalty fee of up to $4.00 per disc may be included
in the bid of this contract. However there is no stipulation that precludes American
Helix and or ESSCOMP from not charging any royalty. 8. Details as to Transferability and Assignability Rights with Regard to
Software. In the event of the demise of ESSCOMP all rights,
together with the source code, revert to HEARST. F. Firm 1990 PRICES AS TO
PRODUCTION COSTS TO HEARST for PREMASTERING OF CD-ROM version of the
1991 IC MASTER. The premastering and mastering prices will be as follows:
style="font-family: Verdana;"> 3 Day Turnaround - $2500 5 Day Turnaround - $1500 10 Day
Turnaround - $1000 G. FIRM 1990 PRICES AS TO COSTS
TO HEARST FOR MASTERING CD-ROM version of the 1991 IC
MASTER. Included in
prices for ""G". H. FIRM 1990 PRICES AS TO PRODUCTION COSTS TO HEARST
for production of CD-ROM discs in lots of 100's and 1,000s, and estimate re-run
costs. Replication
prices including 2 color printing, insertion of customer provided inserts, jewel box,
and shrink wrap: $1.90 per disc up to 5,000 replicas $1.80
per disc up to 10,000 replicas $1.70 per
disc above 10,000 replicas Rerun orders are same as
above I. THE TIMETABLE to complete
each phase of proposal from receipt of data to mastering of the CD-ROM. A
timetable of events as dictated by Hearst's requirements is included in this RFP on
page 16. The
timetable dictated by HEARST will be acceptable by AMERICAN HELIX/ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP, LTD.,. J. WARRANTIES AND GUARANTIES. Include standard
language pertaining to WARRANTIES AND INDEMNITIES used in agreements in force
for similar projects and statements as to whether standard language has EVER been
modified for ANY client. "INFORMATION NOT APPLICABLE" K. ABILITY TO INCLUDE IN
EVENTUAL AGREEMENT WITH HEARST A MOST FAVORED NATION CLAUSE
assuring Hearst that if Vendor's bid is accepted, Vendor will pass on to Hearst any
price reductions related to services rendered that occur between bid and delivery
for any service rendered. <hr
Verdana;">April 16, 1990 Ken Clark Bell Atlantic 6701 Democracy Boulevard Bethesda, MD
Verdana;">Dear
Ken: As per our
previous meeting, the following is a cost estimate of the CD-ROM prototype that we
have proposed. Storyboard Presentation Program ... $1,000 Prototype CD-ROM Disc including
the following: CD-ROM
design, configuration, production, and simulation; CD-ROM premastering, CD-ROM
mastering, and replication (50 Discs); 2 color printing, jewel boxes, and shrink
wrapped; requirements include receiving camera ready label art for printing;
Verdana;">Cost estimate
assumes 10 megabytes of electronic data delivered to American Helix ...
$7,500 "IMPLEMENTING
CD-ROM TECHNOLOGY" Course book..$ 450 Please note
that the suggested functions and capabilities are just that --- suggestions, we would
of course design the final prototype according to your
specifications. The
following is a brief description of the functions and capabilities that are illustrated in
the storyboard demo program: 1. "ELECTRONIC DIRECTORY" or EXECUTIVE INFORMATION
SYSTEM - This system is intended to deliver a value added application of utilizing
the original telephone directory data for other functional applications. This is
intended to support the many businesses and organizations that have installed
computer networks, however it also has the same functions for single user systems.
Verdana;">1.1 "DIRECTORY"
- The directory is the conventional look up function. Searches could include by
name; number; and or address. This will include an intelligent browse function.
This will allow the user to type the letters of the name while having the search begin
on the first letter and continue until it finds the match. This will also let the user use
a normal browse to browse line by line without having to begin a new search
routine. - "ROLODEX" with
the push of a function key, the user can build his/her own personal rolodex file. This
will include a function key to print rolodex cards or phone directories to
paper. - "DIAL
TELEPHONE" with the push of a function key, the system will automatically dial the
number retrieved, and could include an automatic redial
function. 1.2 "FOOD" - This
is a menu of various food services and restaurants. A later menu would search
among different food types and among different demographic regions, will a
function key for the locator map. 1.3"HOTELS" -
This menu would function similar to the above "FOOD" menu. 1.4
"STOCK INFORMATION" - This menu could allow the user to dial into CompuServe or
any other related bulletin board with financial information. 1.5 "ENTERTAINMENT" - This menu
could function as a directory of recreational activities, arts and humanities,
nighttime entertainment, historical monuments. This application may not apply to
demographical areas. 1.6 "TRANSPORTATION" (not shown) This menu could provide
the listings of airlines, airports, bus services, car rentals, train services, limousine
services, and other related transportation services. Please note that this demonstration program is an
illustrated storyboard that suggests how the prototype system would operate and
function. All menus would have the functionality, however the screens will
vary. Any
prototype developed for Bell Atlantic would be for the sole purpose of
demonstrating the "BELL ATLANTIC ELECTRONIC DIRECTORY " to internal personnel
only, unless otherwise agreed. There will be no royalties attached to the prototype
discs produced. Best
Regards, Stan J. Caterbone Director of
Marketing, Advanced Media Group <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;">June 8, 1990 Lucy H. Griffen American Bankers
Association 1120 Connecticut Avenue,
N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 Dear Lucy: As per our previous discussion,
the following is a suggested agenda for our meeting on June 15th at 11:00 am
: 1.Review
& Evaluate data and information for project A)Note Pad
capability B)Printing
capability C)Auditing D)Other Capabilities 3.Discuss ABA internal business issues of system and
project. 4.Discuss what is needed to sell project to key
decision makers: A)Storyboard Application 
B)Prototype Application 
C)Other 6. Discuss plan of action and
implementation schedule. Lucy, it might be helpful if you could plan to have a PC (IBM
DOS/COLOR MONITOR) available for our meeting. Please understand that this in not
absolutely necessary for this meeting. I look forward to seeing you on the 15th. Please call if you have
any questions regarding the above agenda. Sincerely, Stan J.
size="2">President, Advanced Media Group,
LTD., <hr style="width: 100%;
height: 2px;"><div style="text-align: center;">March 6, 1991 </div><div style="text-align: center;">Press Release </div> <div style="text-align:
center;"> COMMODORE CDTV STRATEGIC
ALLIANCE </div> The Advanced Media Group, Ltd., has recently signed a licensing
agreement with Commodore International, Ltd., the West Chester computer maker.
The strategic alliance is aimed at combining the digital technologies expertise of the
Advanced Media Group, Ltd., with the development of the Commodore CDTV
multimedia machine. The new system was officially introduced at the Consumer
Electronics Show, in Las Vegas this past January. The first shipments are expected
to follow immediately after the MICROSOFT CD-ROM Show, which will be held in San
Jose, CA in a few weeks. The show is the largest CD-ROM trade show for this new
and emerging technology. The CDTV is one of the boldest attempts of a computer maker to create
a new category in the elusive field of consumer electronics. The field of competition
is intense, including, Apple Computer, Inc., International Business Machines (IBM),
and Tandy Electronics. The systems will support "game", reference, and also
educational applications from the arms of film giants Lucasfilm and
Disney. Mr. Bushnell, who
sold Atari in 1976, is challenged with a mission to effectively integrate the best
aspects of television with computing. The foundation of the technology is built
around CD-Audio and CD-ROM subsystems. The vast amounts of storage capacity
inherent in CD-ROM technology coupled with the "interactivity" of multimedia
presentations give the systems unlimited potential. However, what makes the CDTV unique is that the
complete system is only the size of a conventional CD player. Any TV monitor can
be used without the need for a computer. The system is operated with an infrared
remote control. The system can also be adapted to an entertainment system and
can play both CD-Audio or CD-CDTV discs. This will make it the first system to link
the bridge between the conventional computer markets and the consumer markets
driven by CD-ROM technology. The retail price is expected to be under
$1,000. Stan Caterbone
had manufactured the first CD-ROM disc for Commodore International Ltd., more
than a year ago. The Advanced Media Group, Ltd., had been working with
Commodore during the early development for the system over the past year.
Verdana;">The licensing
agreement will establish the Advanced Media Group, Ltd., as one of two domestic
premastering sites for the country. Because of the proprietary operating system, all
applications developed for the systems will require that the applications be
processed at one of the two sites. There is currently one site in the United
Kingdom for the international markets. The Advanced Media Group, Ltd., will also
provide end to end manufacturing for the CDTV discs. The Advanced Media Group, Ltd.,
will also develop its own portfolio of educational applications for the new systems.
Several products are currently in the exploratory phase. Negotiations are currently
being held with DONNELLY GEOSYSTEMS, a division of R.R. Donnelly, of Chicago
Illinois. This strategic alliance will allow the Advanced Media Group, Ltd., to provide
CD-ROM technologies and capabilities to the incredible portfolio of information
assets that R.R. Donnelly prints, publishes, and administers. R.R. Donnelly is currently the largest
printer in the world, and currently manages a wealth of information. The migration
from publishing information on paper to that of optical discs will be the primary
mission of the strategic alliance. Donnelly Geosystems has developed an extensive portfolio of
digitized raster and vector mapping systems that cover all parts of the world. The
Advanced Media Group, Ltd., is currently designing educational applications for K
through 12 grades that will produce multimedia interactive geography
lessons. Since its
inception, the Advanced Media Group, Ltd., has cited the educational market as its
primary area of interest. However, the markets' evolution is challenged by the
faltering educational infrastructure and the lack of financial resources. Fortunately,
there is a consortium of larger corporations that feel a real sense of social
responsibility to contribute to improving the educational system at large.
Interactive multimedia technologies is expected to play an important part. Some of
the corporations chartering this movement includes IBM, Xerox, and Lucasfilm, to
name a few. <br style="font-
Advanced Media Group, Ltd., capabilities and human resources include extensive
experience in Engineering, Instructional Design, Graphics Technologies, and
Courseware Development for the interactive educational multimedia markets.
These capabilities are coupled with a strong and successful foundation in the optical
publishing industry. CD-ROM, IVD, Videodisc, CDTV, DVI and Worm technologies are
all included in it's capabilities. Multiplatform authoring systems, Graphics Librarian,
and CD-ROM Search Engines have been developed by the engineers of the
Advanced Media Group, Ltd., Educational courses that have been designed include: Composite
Materials Manufacturing; Accounting Principles; Teacher Induction Training; and
Interactive Math 1 & 2 (K-12, 13 & 14) operating on CD-ROM & IVD
concurrently. <hr style="width:
100%; height: 2px;">June 22,
Verdana;">Henry
Carls Hampton Inn Corporate
Offices Memphis, TN Dear Henry: As per our conversation, we are looking forward to the
opportunity to work with you. As I have mentioned, I would like to first examine and
evaluate your drawings. At the same time, I would like to ask you a few general
questions so that I can determine the scope of work needed to produce a system
that will meet your specifications and requirements. Would you please provide the
following? Please provide a wish list of system capabilities that are required
in order for this project to be of value to your organization. Just a few words for
each item will be sufficient. If you have any questions or concerns, please call. I look forward to
reviewing your project. Regards, Stan J.
size="2">Director, Advanced Media Group,
LTD., <hr style="width: 100%;
height: 2px;">February 19, 1991 Allon Lefever High Industries,
Inc.. William Penn Way Lancaster,
PA 17603 Dear Allon: As per your request, you will find some enclosed statistics that
will be more
than adequate for your purposes. This is one of the more descriptive statistical analysis
of the CD-ROM industry that I have reviewed. I hope you find it equally impressive. On another matter, I have been selected as a delegate for the
State
Committees for Publishing, composed of various publishers from throughout the United States.
This delegation will visit the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe this summer.
The objective
of this visit is "to stimulate the exchange of expertise and knowledge of the methods and
capabilities between American, Soviet, and Eastern Europe publishers,
so as to:
enhance the export of products between nations; identify and expedite the translation of
appropriate
works in each county; and provide both sides with an
insight into the editorial, design, and manufacturing resources available within each
county". The delegation members will spend
two weeks visiting major publishing houses, bookstores, printer, research institutes,
universities,
and libraries in several cities. Delegates will meet with the Ministries of Culture,
discuss topics of mutual interest with our counterparts, and receive updates from
Soviet and European technology specialists, printers, authors, and editors. "The project will enable the delegates to establish the
basis for joint
ventures and long-term professional dialoque with publishers, manufacturers, and
members of the academic community, as well as individuals from the
Soviet and
Eastern European governments". I
will be soliciting sponsorships from corporations that have a vested interest in developing
business opportunities with the respective nations. This might present opportunities not only in regards
to CD-ROM publishing, but more importantly with respect to manufacturing
facilities, of
which would be in the interests of High Industries and American Helix.
In return for
funding the estimated expenses of $4,500, I will pursue communications and
dialogue that are of the interests of the corporate sponsor, and will return will as much
information as possible for the respective sponsor, including contacts. Because of the logistics and planning required to implement this
delegation, I
am required to submit my commitment as soon as possible. I will also approach R.R.
Donnelly as a corporate sponsor, who incidentally is a "Sustaining Member" of the State
Committees
for Publishing. <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"><div
style="text-align: center;">ESCOMP SEARCH ENGINE PROJECT
(i.e.Google) </div> OVERVIEW - The purpose of our
meeting (Wayne, Stan, Skip) was to "establish an equitable, productive and
profitable relationship" between AMG (Advanced Media Group) and Escomp (Search
and Retrieval Software). The goals and objectives of this relationship will be as
follows: 1. To provide
data and information retrieval software projects that are contracted by AMG and
technologies developed by ESSCOMP . 2. To provide data and information preparation for supporting the
information technology industries. 3. To
provide other software products and utilities into an authoring system for the CD-
ROM industry . 4. To develop a library of utilities
that can evolve that will utilize the services of ESSCOMP for the AMG
. 5. To market and contract CD-ROM
development projects production and retrieval of the information as specified for
the projects technologies and products that are developed by Advanced Media
Group. 6. To develop market and industry recognition
for the ESSCOMP products produced by ESSCOMP. 7. To
create new markets for the technologies and "through the use of the AMERICAN
HELIX technologies,". 8. To provide additional credibility
for ESSCOMP "facility, corporate identity, and the association with" "High Industries,
Inc the information technology industry through the AMG &
ESSCOMP. 9. To position ourselves as a
technological leader in following: superior products and services; dedication and
commitment in the delivery of products and "services; highest regards for quality
assurance, and "customer service; a realization that performance is the only
measure for success for the information technology
industry". 10. To develop new technologies, products and
services" "society through our products and serives, with
specific". 11. To make a contribution toward the
betterment of our regards for educational institutions. <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"> </div>
 
PROJECT HOPE

value="http://www.youtube.com/v/olG_WGiMB8Y&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/olG_WGiMB8Y&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x5d1719&col
<div style="text-align: justify;"><div style="text-align: center; font-family:

Verdana;">Tom's Project Hope Foundation </div> In 1996 Project Hope
Foundation produced <a style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 0);"
target="_blank" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=olG_WGiMB8Y"
class="RE">instructional video "Numbers Don't Lie"</a>, produced and directed by Dr. Phil Caterbone
& Psychologist Craig Crabtree, both of Austin, Texas. "Numbers Don't Lie" has
been sold to the Texas School Board of Education, and has been provided to Faith
Based non-profit organizations, school districts, church groups, and municipalities
by Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group. Project Hope provided
funding for the Mental Health Alliance of Lancaster County, Contact/Lifeline of
Lancaster <a style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 0);" target="_blank"
href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPcwz0RS_Gw" class="RE">(The 24/7
Suicide Prevention Hotline)</a>, The <a style="background-color: rgb(255, 255,
0);" target="_blank" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEQ753lPHp8"
class="RE">Schreiber Pediatric Center</a>, and other charitable organizations and
faith based charities. In 1999 Project Hope donated and constructed a soccer
field on the new Headquarters of the Schreiber Pediatric Center on Goods Road, in
Lancaster. Project Hope Foundation was founded after the untimely
suicide of <a style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 0);" target="_blank"
href="http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/toms-legacy-
january-16-1997-highlight.pdf" class="RE">Tommy Caterbone in 1996 (Highlighted
text are mostly misrepresentations and fabrications by Lancaster Newspapers)</a>.
The Lancaster County Mental Health/Mental Retardation department is currently
using the video as a resource Mental Health/Mental Retardation
Department. Tom's Project Hope is funded by an annual golf tournament
on the 1st Saturday in August, called the Tommy Caterbone Memorial Golf
Tournament. </div>
ACTIVIST SHAREHOLDER
<div style="text-align: justify; font-family: Verdana;"><a target="_blank"
href="http://search.messages.yahoo.com/search?.mbintl=finance&q=advance
dmediagroup&action=Search&r=Huiz75WdCYfD_KCA2Dc-
&within=author&within=tm" class="RE">Activist Shareholder of Fulton
Financial Corporation and Fulton Bank, Lancaster,
Pennsylvania</a> Fulton Financial is listed as "FULT" on the NASDAQ
Stock Exchange In 2006 Stan J. Caterbone began his role as an Activist
Shareholder for Fulton Financial, which is listed as "FULT" on the NASDAQ stock
exchange. As a founder of Financial Management Group, Ltd., a full service financial
firm, Stan J. Caterbone has drawn upon the success in developing the strategic
vision for his company and the experience gained in directing the legal affairs and
public offering efforts in dealing with Fulton Financial. Stan J. Caterbone has been in
recent discussions with the Fulton Financial Board of Directors with regards to
various complaints dealing with such issues as the Resource Bank acquisition and
the subprime failures. Stan J. Caterbone believes that Fulton Financial needs
management to become more aggressive in it's strategic planning and the
performance it expects from it's management team in order to increase shareholder
value. Expanding the footprint of the regional bank has not yielded an increase to
the bottom line that is consistent with the expectations of shareholders. Lancaster
County has seen several local banking institutions acquired by larger regional
banks, thus increasing the competition Fulton Financial will see in it's local
marketplace as well as in it's regional footprint. </div> <div
style="font-family: Verdana; text-align: justify;"><a class="RE" style="background-
color: rgb(255, 255, 0);" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Activist_shareholder"
target="_blank">An activist shareholder</a> uses an equity stake in a corporation
to put public pressure on its management. The goals of activist shareholders range
from financial (increase of shareholder value through changes in corporate policy,
financing structure, cost cutting, etc.) to non-financial (disinvestment from
particular countries, adoption of environmentally friendly policies, etc.). The
attraction of shareholder activism lies in its comparative cheapness; a fairly small
stake (less than 10% of outstanding shares) may be enough to launch a successful
campaign. In comparison, a full takeover bid is a much more costly and difficult
undertaking. Shareholder activism has gained popularity as management
compensation at publicly traded companies and the rising cash balances on
corporate balance sheets have risen. Shareholder activism can take any
of several forms: proxy battles, publicity campaigns, shareholder resolutions,
litigation, and negotiations with management. Daniel Loeb, head of Third Point
Management, is notable for his use of sharply written letters directed towards the
CEOs of his target companies. Some of the recent activist investment
funds include: Icahn Management LP, Santa Monica Partners Opportunity Fund LP
and Relational Investors, LLC. Due to the increasing popularity of the
internet, smaller shareholders have also gained an outlet to voice their opinions. In
2005, small MCI Inc shareholders created an online petition to protest the MCI
Inc/Verizon merger.</div>
INTERNATIONAL SIGNAL AND CONTROL
<div style="font-family: Verdana; text-align: justify;"><div style="text-align:

center;"><a target="_blank"
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Signal_and_Control"
class="RE">International Signal and Control</a> </div> <a target="_blank" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=7kOIOTpxtj8" class="RE">News Broadcast of ISC Indictments Part
1</a> <a target="_blank"
href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9gTaCexSNc" class="RE">News
Broadcast of ISC Indictments Part
2</a> </div><div style="text-align:
justify;"><div style="text-align: justify;">From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia International Signal and Control (ISC) was a U.S. defense
contractor based in the outskirts of Lancaster, Pennsylvania / or Lancaster County
and was involved in the manufacture of electronic missile subassemblies, navigation
components, fuses, power supplies for proximity fuses, and grenade technology. The
company had manufactured sub assemblies for the Shrike and Sparrow missile in
1974, and just after the Vietnam war which was part of a standard arms contract for
the US defense administration. The company also had a commercial repair facility of two meter portable
HAM/ amateur radios from a company in New Jersey called Clegg and, manufactured
communication helmet radios for firemen, and electromic outdoor bug
zappers. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=7kOIOTpxtj8" class="RE">ISC was involved in two major indiscretions, for which
CEO James Guerin received a 15 year prison sentence:</a> <ul><li>It defrauded and caused the collapse of the British company
Ferranti, which acquired it in 1987.</li><li>It exported classified
military technology to South Africa, which was then forwarded to third countries,
notably Iraq. </li></ul><a target="_blank" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=7kOIOTpxtj8" class="RE">Exports to South Africa and
Iraq</a> ISC technology, principally weapons fuses, and were
exported to Iraq via South Africa, allegedly1 with the knowledge of U.S. intelligence
agencies and in violation of United States and United Nations sanctions. U.S.
intelligence agencies were involved in the setting up of electronic listening posts in
South Africa with ISC technology. In 1977 these operations were officially cancelled
due to sanctions but allegedly continued.2 Another link to Iraq was the supply of the specifiations for the MK-20
Rockeye cluster bomb through Chilean defence company Carlos Cardoen, which was
able to build an almost identical weapon.3 In
1992 CEO Guerin pleaded guilty to exporting classified military technology. These
weapons were to aid Iraq in its fight with Iran but prosecutors at Guerin's trial
alleged that some were inevitably used against U.S. and allied troops in the Gulf
War. In 1994, after Bobby Ray Inman requested to be
withdrawn from consideration as Bill Clinton's first Defense Secretary, his critics
speculated that the decision was motivated by a desire to conceal his links to ISC.
Inman was a member of the so-called "shadow board" of the company which was
allegedly either negligent or approved the exports. <a target="_blank"
href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kOIOTpxtj8" class="RE">Ferranti
defrauding and collapse</a> <a
target="_blank" href="gpage.html" class="RE">ISC was acquired by Ferranti in
1987,</a> which collapsed in 1993 due to the debts of its new subsidiary.
International Signal and Control's CEO James Guerin was found guilty of defrauding
Ferranti by inflating the order the book of ISC, prior to and during the acquisition,
with fictitious contracts. Ferranti was broken up and the majority of the defence
businesses were purchased by GEC. Sources 1. e.g. [1] [2] 2. www.greenleft.org.au: US link in South African missile
technology 3. www.cryptogon.com: Historical
Perspectives on the Persian Gulf Crisis (PDF) Retrieved from
"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Signal_and_Control" Category: Defunct companies of the United
States <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"><a target="_blank" href="http://www.greenleft.org.au/1991/18/1071"
class="RE">US link in South African missile technology</a>
 26 June
style="font-family: Verdana;">By Norm Dixon The claim that Iraq was developing a nuclear weapons capability and
ballistic missile technology was one of the major justifications for the US-led war in
the Gulf. Yet it has been revealed that the US government turned a blind eye as
similar technology was transferred to South Africa in contravention of US export
laws and the international arms embargo of South Africa. According to a London Financial Times-US ABC team of investigative
reporters, the transfers occurred between 1984 and 1988 with the knowledge of the
Central Intelligence Agency. Ironically, some of this sensitive technology was then
redirected from South Africa to Iraq. An account of the investigation was published
in a recent edition of the Johannesburg-based Southern Africa Report. The shipments were first made by a Pennsylvania-based
electronics company, International Signal and Control (ISC), and they continued
after the company was bought by the British defence contractor, Ferranti, in 1987.
 The equipment included material which could be
used to develop a missile capable of carrying nuclear warheads, photo-imaging
equipment for determining the performance of missile tests and gyroscopes used in
inertial navigation or guidance systems. Advanced radar-controlled anti-aircraft systems were shipped to South
Africa. South Africa, together with ISC, also developed a sophisticated ground-to-air
missile for its own use and for export. All this equipment was restricted US technology requiring export
licences, which were not obtained. James Guerin, the owner of ISC, who became
deputy chairperson of Ferranti, claims the company's activities were sanctioned by
the US government. The investigators reported that
Guerin set up a front company with the South African authorities for the US National
Security Agency, as part of a US covert operation in 1974. This involved shipping
advanced electronic sensors, optics and related equipment to South Africa without
licenses so as to set up listening posts to track Soviet submarines off the Cape of
Good Hope. This company, Gamma Systems
Associates, ordered restricted equipment from ISC, then shipped it on to South
Africa on board airliners. The equipment was repackaged and the airline companies
given false descriptions of the equipment. The operation ceased to have official sanction in
1977. Despite this, between 1982 and
1988 Gamma continued to ship electronics for ISC to South Africa when Pretoria, in
partnership with Israel, was developing a long-range ballistic missile. In 1984, the investigators report, Guerin offered to work directly
for the CIA. Then almost weekly shipments of sensitive equipment necessary for the
construction of long-range ballistic missiles began to flow to South Africa on a route
identical to the original channel. Customers included the South African state arms
company, Armscor, for whom Guerin acted as consultant in 1977. In July 1989, Armscor tested a ballistic missile with a range of
1400 kilometres. Ten years before, satellites recorded a double flash in the Indian
Ocean. This is suspected to have been a joint South African-Israeli nuclear test.
Verdana;">From:
International News, Green Left Weekly issue #18 26 June 1991.
 <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"><a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bobby_Ray_Inman"
class="RE">Bobby Ray Inman</a> From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Bobby Ray
Inman Bobby Ray Inman (born April 4, 1931 in Rhonesboro,
Texas) is a retired U.S. admiral who held several influential positions in the U.S.
Intelligence community. He served as Director of Naval Intelligence from September 1974 to July
1976, then moved to the Defense Intelligence Agency where he served as Vice
Director until 1977. He next became the Director of the National Security Agency.
Inman held this post until 1981. His last major position was as the Deputy Director
of the Central Intelligence Agency, a post he held from February 12, 1981 to June
10, 1982. He is known publicly as President Bill Clinton's first
choice to succeed Les Aspin as Secretary of Defense in 1993. He withdrew from
consideration in a televised conference in which he complained about a
"conspiracy" to attack his character. He has also been influential in various advisory roles. Notably, he
chaired a commission on improving security at U.S. foreign installations after the
Marine barracks bombing and the April 1983 US Embassy bombing in Beirut,
Lebanon. The commission's report has been influential in setting security design
standards for U.S. Embassies. Since 2001, Inman has been the LBJ Centennial Chair in National Policy
at The University of Texas at Austin Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs, and
in 2005 was the school's interim dean [1]. Inman graduated from Texas with a
bachelor's in history in 1950. Inman has also served on the Board of Directors of the prestigious
Council on Foreign Relations and on the Board of Directors of Dell [2]. In 2006,
Inman criticized the Bush administration's use of warrantless domestic wiretaps,
making him one of the highest-ranking former intelligence officials to criticize the
program in public [3][4]. External links <a target="_blank"
href="http://utopia.utexas.edu/articles/alcalde/inman.html?sec=law?=none%20Bob
%20Inman%20on%20Terrorism" class="RE">Biography of Bobby Ray
Inman</a> 
*[http://utopia.utexas.edu/articles/alcalde/inman.html?sec=law=none Bob
Inman on Terrorism Notes 1. Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs. Biography of Bobby R.
Inman, retrieved October 16, 2007 2. Pletz, John.
"Michael Dell's view from the top", Austin American-Statesman, May 2,
style="font-family: Verdana;">3. Shachtman, Noah. "Ex-NSA Chief Assails Bush
Taps", Wired News, May 9, 2006 4. "Ex-NSA Head
Bobby Ray Inman on the National Security Agencys Domestic Surveillance Program:
This Activity Was Not Authorized", <a target="_blank"
href="www.democracynow.org" class="RE">www.democracynow.org,</a> May 17,
2006 <hr style="width: 100%;
height: 2px;"><a target="_self" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ferranti"
class="RE">FERRANTI</a> </div>Ferranti
or Ferranti International plc by the time of its collapse, was a major UK electrical
engineering and equipment firm, known primarily for defence electronics and power
grid systems. </div> <div style="text-align: justify;">Ferranti is also famous in the computer industry for building the second
commercial computer, the Ferranti Mark I, which went on sale in 1949 and started
their computer business which lasted into the 1970s. They had influential
collaborations with the University computing departments at Manchester and
Cambridge, which resulted in the development of the Mercury and Atlas machines
(Manchester); and the Atlas 2 or Titan (Cambridge). </div> Beginnings <div style="text-align: justify;">Sebastian Ziani de Ferranti went into this business in 1882 when
he set up shop in London designing various electrical devices. Ferranti bet on AC
early on, and was one of the few experts in this system in the UK. In 1887 the
London Electric Supply Corporation (LESCo) hired Ferranti for the design of their
power station at Deptford. He designed the building, the generating plant and the
distribution system. On its completion in 1891 it was the first truly modern power
station, supplying high-voltage AC power that was then "stepped down" for
consumer use on each street. This basic system remains in use today around the
world. Rapid
Growth Success followed and Ferranti
started producing electrical equipment for sale. Soon the company was looking for
considerably more room. Prices in the London area were too high, so the company
moved to Hollinwood in Oldham in 1896. Ferranti Ltd. was established in 1905. By
the end of the decade Ferranti had amassed 176 patents for such things as the
alternator, high-tension cables, circuit breakers, transformers and
turbines. Through the early part of the
century power was supplied by small companies, typically as an offshoot of plant
set up to provide power to local industry. Each plant supplied a different standard,
which made the mass production of electrical equipment for home users rather
difficult. In 1910 Ferranti started an effort to standardize the power supply, which
eventually culminated in the National Grid in 1926. High voltage power transformers became an important product for
Ferranti, some of the largest types weighed over a hundred tons. Ferranti built a
new power transformer works at Hollinwood in the late 1940s, however the orders
the company had hoped for did not materialize, and the transformer division closed
in 1979, severing the last link Ferranti had with heavy electrical
engineering. Electricity meters were another
key product for Ferranti, the company became an important supplier to many
electricity supply companies. The meter business was eventually sold to Siemens in
the 1980s, following a joint venture with them called FML. New factories were set up in the north-west at Moston, Wythenshawe,
Cheadle Heath and Gorton which were happy for the jobs. Eventually they set up
branch-plants in Edinburgh, Dalkeith, Aberdeen, Bracknell and Cwmbran as well as
Germany and the U.S and several British Commonwealth countries including
Canada, Australia and Singapore. Ferranti
Australia was based in Revesby, Sydney NSW. There was also a branch office in
South Australia. It was primarily defence based. SCTT3, PVS etc Ferranti manufactured many "white goods" such as
Televisions, Radios, and electric clocks at its Moston plant, in addition Ferranti
Instruments, again based at Moston developed various items for scientific
measurements, including one of the first cone and plate viscometers. Defence
Electronics During World War II, Ferranti
became a major supplier of electronics, fuzes, valves, and was heavily involved in
the early development of radar in the United Kingdom. In the post-war era this
became a large segment of their company, with various branches supplying radar
sets, avionics and other military electronics, both in the UK and their various
international offices. In 1943 Ferranti opened a
factory at Crewe Toll in Edinburgh to manufacture Gyro Gunsights for the Spitfire
aircraft. After the war this business (Ferranti Scotland) would grow to employ 8,000
staff in 8 locations, becoming the birth place of the Scottish electronics industry,
and a major contributor to Company profitability. Early post war work focused on the development of airborne radar with
the company subsequently supplying radars to most of the UK's fast jet and
helicopter fleets. Today the Crewe Toll site (now SELEX Sensors and Airborne
Systems) leads the consortium providing the Radar for the Eurofighter
Typhoon. Inertial Navigation became an
important product line for the company with systems designed for fast jet (Harrier,
Tornado), Space and Land applications. This product line later employed solid state
ring laser gyros manufactured at Crewe Toll. The company's activities expanded into cockpit displays (moving map,
head-down, head-up)video cameras and recorders, pilots night vision goggles,
integrated helmets, and pilot's stick controls. With the invention of the Laser in the 1960's the company quickly
established itself in the Electro-optics arena. From the early 70's it was delivering
the Laser Rangefinder and Marked Target Seeker (LRMTS) for the Jaguar and Harrier
fleets, and later for Tornado. It supplied the world's first man-portable laser
rangefinder/designator (Laser Target Marker, LTM) to the British Army in 1974, and
had notable successes in the US market, establishing Ferranti Electro-optics Inc in
Huntington Beach, California. It's TIALD Pod (Thermal Imager and Laser Designator)
has been in almost constant combat opeation on Tornado since it was rushed into
service during the first Gulf War. By the time this
business was sold to GEC in 1990 it had reached a pre-eminent position in the UK
Defence Electronics market. On the Tornado aircraft, it was supplying the Radar
Transmitter, Inertial Navigation System, LRMTS, TIALD Pod, Mission recording
equipment, and Cockpit Displays. Computers In the late 1940s Ferranti
joined with various university-based research groups to develop computers. Their
first effort was the Ferranti Mark I, with about nine delivered from 19511957. The
Pegasus introduced in 1956 was their most popular valve (vacuum tube) system,
with 38 units sold. Circa 1956, Ivan Idelson, at
Ferranti, originates the Cluff-Foster-Idelson coding of characters on 7 track paper
tape for a BSI committee. This eventually becomes ASCII. In collaboration with the University of Manchester they built a new
version of the famous Manchester Mark I that replaced valve diodes with solid state
versions, which allowed the speed to be increased dramatically as well as increasing
reliability. Ferranti offered the result commercially as the Mercury starting in 1957,
and eventually sold nineteen in total. Although a small part of Ferranti's empire, the
computer division was nevertheless highly visible. Work on a completely new design, the Atlas, started soon after the
delivery of the Mercury, aiming to dramatically improve performance. The machine
first ran in 1962, and Ferranti eventually built three machines in total. A version of
the Atlas modified for the needs of the University of Cambridge Mathematical
Laboratory led to the Titan (or Atlas 2), which was the mainstay of scientific
computing in Cambridge for nearly 8 years. By the early 1960s their mid-size machines were no longer competitive,
but efforts to design a replacement were bogged down. Into this void stepped the
Canadian division, Ferranti-Packard, who had used several of the ideas under
development in England to very quickly produce the Ferranti-Packard 6000. By this
time Ferranti's management had tired of the entire market and were looking for
someone to buy the entire division. Eventually it was merged into International
Computers and Tabulators (ICT) in 1963. After studying several options, ICT selected
the FP 6000 as the basis for their ICT 1900 line which sold into the
1970s. The deal setting up ICT excluded
Ferranti from the commercial sector of computing; but left the industrial field free.
Some of the technology of the FP 6000 was later used in its Ferranti Argus range of
industrial computers which were developed in its Wythenshawe factory. The first of
these, simple Argus, was initially developed for military use. Meanwhile in Bracknell Digital Systems division was
developing a range of mainframe computers for naval applications. Early computers
using discrete transistors were the Hermes and Poseidon and these were followed
by the F1600 in the mid 1960s. Some of these machines remained in active service
on naval vessels for many years. The FM1600B was the first of the range to use
integrated circuits and used in many naval and commercial applications. The
FM1600D was a single rack version of the computer for smaller systems. An
airborne version of this was also made and used aboard the RAF Nimrod. The last in
the series was the FM1600E which was a redesigned and updated version of the
FM1600B. Semiconductors Ferranti had been involved in production of electronic devices including
cathode ray tube devices and germanium semiconductors for some time before it
became the first European company to produce a silicon diode, in 1955. Ferranti
Semiconductor Ltd. went on to produce a range of silicon bipolar devices including,
in 1977, the F100-L, an early 16-bit single chip microprocessor with 16-bit
addressing. An F100-L was carried into space on the amateur radio satellite UoSAT-1
(Oscar 9).[1]. Ferranti's ZTX series bipolar transistors gave their name to the
inheritor of Ferranti Semiconductor's discrete semiconductor business, Zetex
plc[2]. In the early eighties, Ferranti
produced some of the first large uncommitted logic arrays (ULAs), used in home
computers such as the Sinclair ZX81, Sinclair ZX Spectrum, Acorn Electron and BBC
Microcomputer. The microelectronics business was sold to Plessey in
1988. Dissolution Ferranti concentrated on
their defence sales from the late 1980s. The Bloodhound SAM, for which they
developed radar systems, was a key money earner. Ferranti purchased International Signal and Control (ISC), a Pennsylvania
based defence contractor, in 1987 and was renamed Ferranti International plc.
Ferranti was reorganised, divisions which were set up include: <ul><li>Ferranti
Computer Systems</li><li>Ferranti Defence
Systems Limited</li><li>Ferranti
Dynamics</li><li>Ferranti Satcomms</li><li>International Signal & Control </li></ul> Unknown to Ferranti, ISC's business primarily
consisted of illegal arms sales started at the behest of various US clandestine
organizations. On paper the company looked to be extremely profitable on sales of
high-priced "above board" items, but in fact these profits were essentially non-
existent. With the sale to Ferranti all illegal sales ended immediately, leaving the
company with no obvious cash flow. In 1989 the
Serious Fraud Office started criminal investigation regarding alleged massive fraud
at ISC. In December 1991 James Guerin, founder of ISC and co-Chairman of the
merged company, pleaded guilty before the federal court in Philadelphia to fraud
committed both in the USA and UK. All offences which would have formed part of
any UK prosecution were encompassed by the US trial and as such no UK trial
proceeded. The massive financial and legal
difficulties that resulted forced Ferranti into bankruptcy in December
Verdana;">The computer section was bought
out of bankruptcy by a Thomson-CSF subsidiary called SYSECA. It traded on as
Ferranti-SYSECA, until the Ferranti name was finally dropped about
Verdana;">Break-up of
Ferranti <ul><li> Ferranti Computer Systems acquired out of
administration by SYSECA [now Thales Information Systems], and renamed Ferranti-
SYSECA Ltd, later the Ferranti was dropped. The department dealing with airport
systems was bought by Datel in around 1995 and continued to trade under the
name Ferranti Airport Systems FASL until it was bought by Ultra Electronics. Other
parts of Ferranti Computer Systems were acquired out of administration by GEC-
Marconi, when GEC-Marconi sold on its defence related businesses to BAE Systems
many of these former Ferranti entities became part of the BAE/Finmeccanica joint
venture called Alenia Marconi Systems. The JV has now been dissolved and the
former Ferranti entities are now part of BAE Systems Integrated System
Technologies (Insyte).</li><li>Ferranti Defence Systems Limited acquired by GEC-Marconi out of
administration and re-named GEC Ferranti, later changing to GEC Marconi Avionics
(GMAv). This business was acquired in 2000 by BAE SYSTEMS (BAE SYSTEMS
Avionics). Part of this business, including the heritage Ferranti operation, was
acquired by Finmeccanica in 2007 and re-named SELEX Sensors and Airborne
Systems.</li><li>Ferranti Dynamics acquired by GEC-Marconi in
style="font-family: Verdana;">Ferranti Instrumentation dissolved. Some assets
acquired by GEC-Marconi and Ravenfield DesignsFerranti Technologies Independent
company</li><li>Ferranti Air Systems acquired by Datel then turned
into an independent company. Later bought by Ultra Electronics50% share of Ferranti Thomson Sonar Systems acquired by GEC-
Marconi</li><li>Ferranti Helicopters acquired by British Caledonian
Airways in April 1979 to become British Caledonian Helicopters which was in turn
acquired by Bristow Helicopters in 1987 </li></ul> Ferranti Defence Systems was acquired by GEC in January 1990. The
selection of the radar had become a major stumbling block in the EFA project (what
would become the Eurofighter Typhoon). Britain, Italy and Spain supported the
Ferranti-led ECR-90, while Germany preferred the MSD2000 (a collaboration
between Hughes, AEG and GEC. An agreement was reached after UK Defence
Secretary Tom King assured his West German counterpart Gerhard Stoltenberg that
the British government would underwrite the project and allow GEC to acquire
Ferranti Defence Systems from its troubled parent.[1] Hughes sued GEC for $600
million for its role in the selection of the EFA and alleged that it used Hughes
technology in the ECR-90 when it took over Ferranti. It later dropped this allegation
and was awarded $23 million, the court judged that the MSD-2000 "had a real or
substantial chance of succeeding had GEC not tortuously intervened... and had the
companies, which were bound by the Collaboration Agreement, faithfully and
diligently performed their continuing obligations thereunder to press and promote
the case for MSD-2000."[2] Remaining Uses of the Ferranti Name A number of uses of the Ferranti name remain in use. In Edinburgh, the
Ferranti Edinburgh Recreation Club (FERC), the Ferranti Mountaineering Club and the
Ferranti Ten-pin Bowling League are still in existence. While these organisations no
longer have any formal ties with the companies which subsumed the Ferranti
companies which operated in Edinburgh, they still operate under the old
names. Denis Ferranti Meters Limited is
still owned by a direct descendant of Sebastian de Ferranti but is not directly related
to the major Ferranti corporation. The company has over 200 employees
manufactures BT's public phones, oil pumps for large industrial vehicles, electric
motors for motorbility solutions, electronics, and small MOD equipment. </div> Trivia * Tim Berners-Lee, acknowledged as the founder of the World Wide
Web, is the son of two designers of the Ferranti Mark I. References 1. Miller, Charles. "Radar
Deal Keeps Britain in Forefront of Airborne Technology", The Press Association Ltd.,
1990-05-08. Retrieved on 2006-11-28. 2. "Court finds GEC
'intervened' on behalf of onetime EFA rival Ferranti", Aerospace Daily, McGraw-Hill
Inc., 1994-03-15, p. 398. Retrieved on 2006-11-28. External links * Museum of Science and Industry in Manchester -
Timeline of Ferranti's History 
DOWNTONW LANCASTER INVESTMENTS
<div style="text-align: justify; font-family: Verdana;">Action Plan Advanced Media Group
has been working with Downtown Lancaster developers, Lancaster City Officials,
and major stakeholders to facilitate this action plan developed in
2006. Project 1 Excelsior Place on
East King Street In 1998 Advanced Media Group had developed a
comprehensive plan for the revitalization of the Excelsior Place Historic Property
(Sprecher Brewery) located 1 block from the proposed Downtown Lancaster
Convention Center. We had planned a unique entertainment complex comprised of
a Pub, an upscale restaurant in the lower catacomb, and a nightclub in the first
floor. We had also developed and designed a state-of-the-art video conferencing
facility to compliment the Convention Center. We have joined in the talks and
discussions with principals, stakeholders, and taxing authorities concerning the
present proposals and the future of the revitalization of Downtown Lancaster and
the Convention Center. Advanced Media Group/Project Hope filed a Civil
Action in the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County against Drew Anthon and
the Eden Resort Inn (Lancaster County Hoteliers) for their attempts to withhold the
Tourism Tax and Hotel Tax that supports the Downtown Lancaster Convention
Center. The City of Lancaster supported the civil action. We also proposed an
alternative plan to move the Convention Center to the Hotel Brunswick and
Lancaster Square to all of the major stakeholders. In 2007 Advanced
Media Group signed a Non Disclosure Agreement with a local real estate firm to
continue the advancement of the Excelsior Place Business Plan. Project 2 UPS/MBE Copy Store or FedEx/Kinkos Copy
& Print Store Advanced Media Group
has an exclusive agreement for a UPS Shipping/Copy Store or a FedEx/Kinkos in
Downtown Lancaster. The Advanced Media Group had selected the site of the corner
of Queen and Chestnut Streets, a former bank owned by the Hotel Brunswick. The
site has a walk in safe suitable for the records management service. Advanced
Media had been in talks with the Hotel Brunswick for the past year regarding leasing
options. There is no such service currently serving the needs of downtown
businesses and it is a vital component for the Lancaster County Convention Center.
In 1998 Advanced Media Group had contacted Mail Box Etc., and began initial
franchise due diligence. However when the Lancaster County Convention Center
was stalled, Advanced Media Group also put the project on the back burner. In 2005
Advanced Media Group negotiated for the exclusive right of first refusal to move the
UPS Store at Stone Mill Plaza to downtown Lancaster. The UPS/MBE
Franchise is ranked number 4 among all franchises and number one in the shipping-
postal store categories by Forbes. Advanced Media Group would also add
services such as scanning, imaging, and records management services that would
attract an additional market to the concept. The UPS/MBE Franchise is ranked
number 4 among all franchises and number one in the shipping-postal store
categories by Forbes. Advanced Media Group is currently studying several site
locations, including storefronts at the Brunswick Hotel, and a possible East King
Street site. Advanced Media Group would like to cater to the many legal firms that
conduct business in the Lancaster County Courthouse. In 1990 Advanced
Media Group developed and copyrighted the AMG Legal Systems Prototype which
was a digital search and retrieval application designed to help legal firms deal with
the complexities of organizing and filing court cases. Advanced Media
Group has specialized in records management and has a vast knowledge base and
experience in optical publishing and records management. This service would allow
firms to convert and store records off-site in a secure location with state-of-the-art
retrieval services. Typical Desktop Publishing services and binding
services would also be offered. Project
3 Downtown Lancaster Movie Theater A downtown Lancaster Movie
Theater is vital to support the Lancaster County Convention Center and the
Downtown Lancaster Revitalization at large. Advanced Media Group has
been performing due diligence on reopening the movie theaters at the Hotel
Brunswick for the past 18 months. A recent site survey confirms that the movie
theaters are in operating condition and negotiations with local business leaders and
the Hotel Brunswick have been continuing for the past year. The Brunswick movie
theater has 2 screens with approximately 500 seats per screen. Advanced
Media Group is proposing a multi-purpose theater capable of providing live
theatrical and concerts by opening up both theaters to a common
stage. Project 4 Big Box Retail in
Downtown Lancaster Advanced Media Group has been attempting to
help facilitate the attraction of a big box retailer for Downtown Lancaster. In 2006
Advanced Media Group had discussions with the owner of Bulova Technologies
regarding the development of that building to a retail store. The Advanced Media
Group has contacted the Corporate development teams of the Hard Rock Caf and
Best Buy Electronics Stores. In 2005 Advanced Media Group had talks with
former Mayor Charlie Smithgall in attempts at trying to lure a Cabelas or a Pro
Shops (click to see what a Pro Bass Interactive Store looks like) to the
site. </div>
EXCELSIOR PLACE
<div style="text-align: justify;">The following

is our business plan for 125 East King Street, the Excelsior Place property. We
(Advanced Media Group) had proposed this plan in 1999, and currently have a
business agreement with current developers for to incorporate some or all of the
strategies identified in this business plan to fruition. We also have exclusive rights
to negotiate for a UPS Shipping and Copy Center for a downtown location. This
agreement was executed in 2005. We plan to continue negotiations for both
projects. <a target="_blank"
plan-aug-18-2006-updated-feb-10-sept-26-2007.pdf" class="RE">To view the
complete Excelsior Place Business Plan click here.</a> Stan J. Caterbone September 26, 2007 <hr style="width:
100%; height: 2px;"> <div style="text-align: center;">Advanced Media Group Cover And
Disclaimers </div><div style="text-align: center;">This Business Plan and its
contents are confidential and considered the intellectual property of the Advanced
Media Group. Prior written consent is required prior to any redistribution, copy, or
alteration of this Business Plan. </div> This Business Plan is intended to convey information only and shall not
constitute or be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy
securities. The authors acknowledge best efforts in the accuracy of information
contained herein. This edition was submitted without
final proof and edit. Sprenger Management apologizes for any errors or omissions.
Verdana;">1.2 Executive
Summary Sprenger Management, Inc. plans to create and develop an
interconnected destination complex of dining and entertainment at Excelsior Place,
125 East King Street, and Downtown Lancaster. Excelsior Place is a four story Victorian showcase, designated on the
Historic Registry and since 1873 has intermittently served as a brewery, convention
center, social hall and retail store. The restoration and conversion of this remarkable
property are the embodiment of the vision of Sprenger Management in coordination
with The Ray Group and Meeder Development, co-owners of the property. Sprenger
Management's plans for the Excelsior project entail a combination of the four
entities detailed below on the lower courtyard level and first floor. Offices and
professional service businesses are to occupy the floors above. Joined at the rear
with Grant Street Condominiums, Excelsior shares a common pedestrian walkway
with Grant Street Condominiums from King to Grant Street, with parking provided
nearby making travel by foot a convenient option. Located within the Downtown
Investment District, Excelsior Place is a neighbor of the Lancaster Courthouse,
County of Lancaster, Lancaster Newspapers, Inc., Fulton Bank, Penn Square
Conference Center (Proposed), Engle, Hambright, & Davies, Demuth
Foundation, Mellon Bank, and other professional office buildings housing legal, real
estate and other professional business establishments. Sprenger Management Inc. is a partnership of three local businessmen.
Committed personally, professionally and financially to the success of the Excelsior
Place project, these gentlemen bring 50 years of combined experience in food,
beverage and nightclub arenas to the project. Together they have conceived and
formulated the plans that make up the four entities detailed herein. With strong ties
to Lancaster's community, each partner has also experienced life outside of
Lancaster, giving each a fresh perspective and appreciation for the needs found
here. Please find resumes and biographies in the Operations and Management
section. The envisioned entities of
Sprenger Management are: <ul style="font-family: Verdana;"><li>MAZZIS
GRILLE - An upscale yet casual lunch and evening restaurant.</li><li>VILLA CAVA
An elegant and distinctive fine dinning restaurant developed in the underground
catacombs.</li><li>THE EXCELSIOR COURTYARD The visual center of Excelsior
Place, a unique open air courtyard.</li><li>THE BACK ROOM A multi-purpose
room accommodating nighttime entertainment, large private parties and
banquets. </li></ul> They are to operate on an interconnected basis while still
maintaining autonomy as destination locations featuring varied services and
atmospheres. The physical facility found at
Excelsior Place offers a rare opportunity to incorporate historic features of the past
such as the cultural aesthetics of the exterior, an existing grand staircase, antique
hanging light fixtures and a tin ceiling. The improvements will include modern
conveniences such as central air conditioning and handicap accessible
elevators. Drawing on the combined
experience of the principals, designers, architects and business advisors, this
historic structure will be resurrected into a lively and functional food and
entertainment destination echoing the success of years past for Lancaster's first
convention center and brewery. In closing, it is
imperative to embrace revitalization efforts made in Lancaster. At no other time in
our long history has there been such an opportunity for change and rebirth. As we
quickly approach the millennium it is imperative that we join together in support of
individuals and institutions committed to the revival of the city in which we live.
Such commitment can be found in the proposal made here. The Project 2.1 Downtown Lancaster
Revitalization Efforts: In 1998 LDR International, an urban design and planning
consulting firm, was retained by the Economic Development Action Group and the
Lancaster Campaign to develop and coordinate the revitalization efforts of both
public and private sectors contributing to Downtown Lancasters Revitalization. The
report, Lancasters Economic Development Action Agenda was embraced by the
leadership of the revitalization efforts toward the renewal of Downtown
Lancaster. The report identified Excelsior
Place, formerly the Tremellen Building, as a critical component to these
revitalization efforts. The following items were named as implementation actions
necessary to facilitate those efforts: <ul
style="font-family: Verdana;"><li> Acquisition of the Armstrong Lancaster
Square Building</li><li>Acquisition of the Watt and Shand Building (Purchased by
the partnership of High Associates, Lancaster Newspapers, Inc., and the Fulton Bank
for the proposed Conference Center).</li><li>Announced location of expanded
Smith-Barney office at Lancaster Square.</li><li>Mayor Smithgalls commitment to
streamlining the Citys development review process.</li><li>Acquisition and
redevelopment of the Armstrong Liberty Street Building (Currently being developed
by the Drogaris Companies and near completion).</li><li>New awareness and
participation in economic development from South Duke and Prince Street
neighborhoods.</li><li>Fulton Bank purchase of the Woolworth Building (Current
construction of a new $25 million 6 story corporate headquarters to be completed in
early 2000).</li><li>Successful sale of Hotel Brunswick.</li><li>Proposed
development of the Tremellen Building (Excelsior Place).</li><li>Community
awareness and support for making Prince Street, Downtown, and South Duke Street
all that they can be. </li></ul> The following vision statement was developed by the
Economic Development Action Group, the community-at-large and the consulting
team: WE SEE LANCASTER CITY AS A VIBRANT URBAN COMMUNITY WHERE PEOPLE
WILL CHOOSE TO LIVE, WORK, WORSHIP, LEARN, PLAY AND CELEBRATE OUR
DIVERSE HERITAGES. WE SEE LANCASTER CITY AS: <ul style="font-family: Verdana;"><li> A FRIENDLY ENVIRONMENT IN
WHICH TO PROMOTE BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT AND RETENTION, JOB CREATION,
TECHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH INDUSTRIES, AND INVESTOR ACTIVITY;</li><li>THE
DYNAMIC HUB OF LANCASTER COUNTYS FINANCIAL, LEGAL, MEDICAL,
EDUCATIONAL, AND GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES; AND</li><li>AN EXCEPTIONAL
DESTINATION AND SPECIAL EXPERIENCE FOR RESIDENTS FOR VISITORS FROM THE
NORTHEASTERN U.S. AND THROUGHOUT THE WORLD WHO ARE ATTRACTED TO
LANCASTERS HERITAGE, ARTS, CULTURAL, UNIQUE RETAILING, AND
ENTERTAINMENT ACTIVITIES.</li><li>WE SEE A SUSTAINED, ACTION-DRIVEN,
PRIVATE/PUBLIC, COMMITTED INCLUSIVE LEADERSHIP, IN PARTNERSHIP WITH AN
ENTHUSIASTIC AND INVOLVED COMMUNITY, MAKING THIS VISION A
REALITY. </li></ul> In the past eighteen months since this report was published,
numerous projects are currently are development and additional projects are being
proposed. The current state-of-affairs in the Revitalization of Downtown Lancaster is
in the beginning of delivering tangible evidence of the leadership, efforts, and
energies of the Lancasters revitalization efforts. The revitalization of Downtown
Lancaster will showcase Lancaster Countys proud urban heritage, cultural diversity,
and its historic significance. It will soon become a valuable asset of the Lancaster
Community, and a destination which every visitor will enjoy. The authors strongly encourage all interested parties
in the Excelsior Place project to obtain and review the , Lancasters Economic
Development Action Agenda report as a supporting document to this business
plan. </div>
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GROUOP
<div style="text-align: justify;"><div style="text-align: center;"> LAW OFFICES O'DAY & SMITH 243 NORTH
DUKE STREET LANCASTER, PA 176O2 (717) 393-
4001 </div> <div style="text-align:
center;">August 22,
1986 </div> Mr.
Stanley J. Caterbone Financial Management Group, Ltd 1755 Oregon Pike
 Lancaster, PA 17601 Dear
Stan: Enclosed herewith please find
invoice pertaining to the formation of Financial Management Group and its subsidiaries
together with an itemization of all costs and expenditures made. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact
me. Very truly yours, ODAY & SMITH Timothy A. Lanza TAL:djg Enclosure <hr
style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"><div style="text-align: center;">CHARTER
BUSINESS PLAN THE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
GROUP, LTD. </div><div
style="text-align: center;">JULY 1, 1986 A LANCASTER COUNTY
CORPORATION AFFILIATE OFFICES
 Dunedin, Florida Chambersburg, Pennsylvania Shillington,
Pennsylvania Lewisburg, Pennsylvania McConnellsburg, Pennsylvania
 Edina, Minnesota Columbia, Maryland Skippack, Pennsylvania
 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Medford, New Jersey Atlanta,
Georgia <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"></div> TABLE
OF CONTENTS Mission Statement
 Page 2 Corporate
Objectives
 Page 3 Business Strategies
 Page
Verdana;">Distribution Strategies
 Page 6 Services Strategies

Verdana;">Market Penetration Strategies
Verdana;">Planner Support Services
 Page
Verdana;">Corporate Standards
 Page 13 Initial capitalization

Verdana;">Financial Highlights

Verdana;">Contingency Plans

Verdana;">The Management Group
 Page
Verdana;">Organizational Charts: Exhibit A
Page 20 Exhibit B Page
21 MISSION 1. To serve the people of the county, state and nation in the
handling of their finances through the support of our financial planners and other
advisors, and their personal relationships with their clients. 2. To meet the
expectations of our various constituencies: planners, employees, stockholders, and
the people residing in the area we serve. OBJECTIVES 1. To position the company-
as the major provider and servicer of financial products and advice in the closely related fields of
investments, financial consultation,
mortgage banking, life insurance, property and casualty insurance, taxes, law, and real estate. 2.
To transform the fragmented market of independent financial planners
into a quality group of outstanding
professionals marketing under one name, thus bringing order to the financial marketplace. diversified product through multiple sponsors so as to
always deliver high-quality and fairly
priced products representing the top 25% percentile of the marketplace. 4. To develop and
maintain quality service on previously delivered products by managing assets at a reasonable fee, thus freeing planners
from the constant pressure of making
new sales. 5. To insure the growth of the business by hiring professional
planners in sufficient number so as to
become the pre-eminent financial services company in the area served. 6. To use invested
capital rather than loans and long-term leases to minimize monthly expenses and maximize profits, hereby assuring our
business growth and
development. 7. To encourage our planners to become stockholders in the
firm, thus satisfying their desire fox
ownership in a company of real value. Also to assure a more stable development of our business through stranger ties
with our top planners. creative and thoroughly considered
ways. 9. To maintain a strong professional/client relationship through
frequent personal contact while using
high-technology equipment to enhance the quality of our work. BUSINESS STRATEGIES 1. CURRENT
SITUATION Dozens of
small independent planners servicing dissimilar markets through product
Bales. COMPANY STRATEGY Recruit the
small, independent financial planner into our group using a variety of motivating
factors; 1. Economics (reduce their expenses, expand their resource material and backup) 2. Marketplace
recognition and dominance 3. Company identity 4. Equity
ownership 5. Product diversity 6. Higher commissions on each
sale 2. CURRENT
SITUATION Life insurance and brokerage businesses are suffering from poor
performance of products, bad press, and low-quality recruiting cutting commissions;
while productive veterans in these industries are uneasy with these
changes. COMPANY STRATEGY Recruit the most senior, productive
brokers and agents who desire to do more personal planning by providing the
advantages' cited in paragraph 1 above. 3. CURRENT SITUATION The 1986 Tax Act threatens to
reduce the need for tax planning, and tax qualified plans. Rather than seek shelters
and other relief, investors will be likely to pay tax, and invest savings, thereby
increasing the need for asset management and the creation of wealth through
equity investment. COMPANY STRATEGY Market
products that are structured with lower up-front costs and stable ongoing
management renewals in order to build revenue from service over a period of time.
This will gradually replace the heavy enjphasis on new sales and give rise to a truly
responsive 4. CURRENT
Verdana;">Mass marketing through corporate benefit plans and the media
continues to grow as a segment of the financial services business. COMPANY STRATEGY Develop corporate sales through
the concept of cafeteria plans which will change the employee benefit market by
allowing employees to target a percentage of benefit dollars to the areas of their
choice. Also, continue to emphasize seminars targeting unique organizations which
have a strong relationship with the public for specific financial products:
EX. Charitable organization -
charitable giving seminars. estate
planning seminars Counseling
center - life planning seminars, etc. Additionally, we will develop public awareness by constantly advertising
the corporate name via newspaper and radio. 5.CURRENT SITUATION We currently
have 14 financial planners and 5 other professionals committed to an August
occupancy in our new space on the Oregon Pike in Lancaster. Additionally, from
among the 16 people involved, we have selected managers for our offices in
Chambersburg, Lewisburg, Beading and Lansdale. Based on last year's business by
those already involved, we expect to generate 2.7 million dollars in revenue, and
invest 54 million dollars in 1987. COMPANY
STRATEGY We plan to increase our Lancaster staff to 18 financial planners and 6
other profesionals. While we plan to locate and develop in new areas, we will
concentrate during our first year on our Lancaster operations. 6. CURRENT
Verdana;">At least 8 of our staff is comprised of professionals established in
business for at least four years. COMPANY STRATEGY We will continue to seek predominately self-sufficient,
professional "veterans" of the industry. Our desire is to appeal to their need for the
freedom to plan and communicate more effectively with their clients. We'll also offer
a higher payout, more varied products, and a more professional environment. We
will duplicate only the most critical brokerage house services. 7. CURRENT SITUATION Planners have been stable in their
relationship with past employers. COMPANY STRATEGY We expect a very stable core of top planners in
Lancaster, Pa. , due to strong management, stable planners, strong local support
systems, and equity ownership. We will concentrate on local development ahead of
satellite development. We expect our satellite retention to be outstanding where
equity ownership is strong and mediocre where equity ownership is weak. 8. CURRENT SITUATION Planners are independent and thus
use various planning techniques, offer a limited product and differ in their areas of
expertise. COMPANY STRATEGY The expertise and
techniques of our planners and other professionals will be pooled to provide clients
with higher quality service and a broader line of products. SERVICES 1. CURRENT SITUATION
Verdana;">Investment products are predominately delivered through captive sales
organizations who manufacture their own products and manage all monies. This
leads to limited product offerings, which frequently do not entirely satisfy specific
consumer needs. It also leads to a mediocre product because there is no free
market pressure to insure top quality products that are competitively
priced. COMPANY APPROACH Planners will be free to deliver the
highest quality products from among thousands of sponsors so as to work
exclusively for the benefit of the client. The planner may choose top industry
performers, solid and sizeable companies and a variety of "niche" products to fill
every client need. 2. CURRENT SITUATION Fee-paid financial plans vary
widely in price and quality and depend most heavily on the individual developing
the plan or interpreting it. With regard to consumer expectations, the marketplace is
in disarray. COMPANY APPROACH Fee-based plans in advance
of product sales should become simpler due to tax reform. The majority of such
plans were originally purchased for tax planning which may no longer be needed.
Our emphasis will be on a business being revived by tax reform Asset
Management or Investment Monitoring. With clients paying their taxes and
investing for appreciation rather than seeking shelters, this business is expected to
boon. We plan to have an in-house portfolio manager and market-timer. We plan to
charge clients an average of .75% for the service. As planners gain assets under
management, their annual income from this source should alleviate pressure for
new clients. Associated professionals such as attorneys, accountants, bankers, and
insurance and real estate agents seldom cooperate to help clients attain their goals.
Ihe ultimate control of the client's future business tends to become divided, making
people defensive and producing fear of e>q3osure in the event of error. This
often leads to professionals discrediting one another or taking undue credit for
advice leading clients to inaction. COMPANY APPROACH In-house legal and real estate professionals will
enable a planner to get such services for his client without fear of losing the client
to outside interests. It will also help conserve revenue normally spent for such
services. Ongoing client service is a desire for most companies in cur
marketplace. However, the constant pressure is applied to planners to produce new
clients and new sales as 90% of earnings is still commission generated. The time
required to prospect and dose new sales severely limits the necessary servicing
time. COMPANY APPROACH Ongoing client service will be
supplied through a semiannual newsletter and semiannual client investment update
delivered alternately every three months. The costs of these services win be borne
by client-paid asset management fees, insurance renewals and mutual fund trailing
commissions. Although this is an ambitious, high-tech undertaking, our basic
inclination remains toward personal client review sessions held en a regular
basis. We also expect better crossover relationships and broadened
information base for both planners and specialists due to common
location. MARKET PENETRATION STRATEGY 1. Existing Clients - - Planners and
other professional joining our group
will have developed deep personal client relationships, which should allow new investment dollars to be handled by our
people. As follow-up systems are
implemented we expect 65% of all business to come from this source. 2. Seminar Presence -
- We plan to present four seminars on a joint basis with institutions such as colleges, charities, business
organizations and corporations. Our
seminars include "Successful Money
Management" a soup-tonuts on investment products/ ''Half-time" a life planning seminar, "Charitable
Giving" and Retirement Planning
Seminars. Currently our planners regularly appear at Millersville State College, RCA, ALCOA, St.
Joseph's Hospital and elsewhere. We
also plan regular seminars for the
general public. 3. Business and Retirement Markets - - These two markets
will be singled out for specific
emphasis because of the vast potential and strong need for planning among these groups. Business benefit plans
and specifically "cafeteria plans" will
be marketed. Retirement markets will
be expanded primarily through increased seminar marketing. PLANNER SUPPORT SERVICES It is our plan to provide necessary
office and clerical support services to help each planner or affiliate conduct his or
her business. We intend to limit our office to support services and not to provide
specific marketing services for individuals. Our marketing efforts vill be for the
group at large, that is to say that individual prospecting will be a personal expense
borne by the planner or advisor. Inherent in our support services will be the following: 1)
Phone Handling - including the facility to forward other business lines to our central system should a planner
leave the office. 2) Repetitive Standard Correspondence - a sample of thank
you, referral appointment setting, data requests, and commonly used review letters
may be selected and generated. Personal correspondence will not be handled by
our staff, free of charge. 3) Business Processing - completed applications
will be checked, logged, copied and mailed by our cashiers. Follow-up with
broker/dealer or product sponsors will be offered to premier producers only. <br
Computer Services - financial plans and investment monitoring services will
be provided through data base entry. Mass distribution and hard-copy plan
generation will be done on a piece-by-piece and percentage fee basis
respectively. 5) Professional Networking - our in-house affiliates in law,
accounting, tax, estate, real estate, mortgage brokerage, portfolio management, life
insurance and property/casualty insurance stand ready to serve clients related
financial needs. 6) Simply Stocking - prospectus, applications, trust
agreements and other forms needed to conduct business with our major' product
suppliers will be maintained. 7) Reference and Periodicals - professional
journals and data services meeting the cannon need of our advisors will be
purchased and will be maintained by our office staff. Material unique to specialized
areas will be provided by those planners who work in those areas. <br
Corporate Marketing - we will pro mote the name of our firm along with all
planner affiliates to gain public awareness in excess of what any individual alone
could achieve. We will become the best known firm in Central
Pennsylvania. 9) Training and Education - Pooling our production will give
us additional lout with sponsors, industry trainers and those wishing to address our
membership. Cost should be lower and quality higher. It is our plan to provide a
constant flows of information, new product profiles, and specialized planning
techniques. 10) Gross Payout Negotiation - Size and strength of our group
should allow us to increase concessions made by sponsors over amounts normally
negotiable by individuals. <div style="text-align: center;">"OUR STANDARDS
FOR A GREAT COMPANY </div>Having well
established business principles is critical to the success if any few business. Only
persistence, hard work and sufficient capital can rival its importance. We feel the
need to state the basic values of this firm so that the basis for the decision-making
is well established and understood. .... A Great Company 1.
Serves its customers well. 2. Treats people properly. 3. Operates on
high principles. 4. Makes money regularly. 5. Guards the interests of
stockholders and employees. 6. Knows its mission. 7. Knows its position in the
marketplace. 8. Desires solid community and corporate citizenship. 9. Hires superior people and pays
them well. 10. Will change course amidst changing times. 11. Has
the vision to see opportunity. 12. Retains entrepreneurial spirit. 13. Has a
bias for action (do it, try it,fix it). 14. Is value driven. 15. Regards people as
its greatest asset. 16. Uses a lean staff, a simple form management 17.
Pushes decision-making to the lowest level. 18. Promotes deserving
people, regardless of race, sex, or religion. .... We hereby
resolve to build such a company. <div style="text-align: justify;"> INITIAL CAPITALIZATION The above
pages have been omitted due to the legality of preceding the Offering Memorandum
in conjunction with Federal and State Securities Regulations. An offering
Memorandum will be issued to all interested parties upon registration with the
appropriate authorities. This should happen on or before August 1,
1986. CONTINGENCY PLANS The beginning phase of most
businesses is characterized by erratic sales trends, fluctuating market share,
increasing dependence on improving technological systems, and possible cash flow
losses. We do not expect to face any of these problems because of the established
nature of the planners we are hiring. However, we would be foolish to believe that
we somehow were immune from such potential problems and therefore need not to
plan for these eventualities. Our very first
need would be to raise capital through stock purchases beyond our initial capitalization requirements to the extent of at
least $100,000 to cover any initial
shortfall in revenue or budget projections. This would protect us from going the way of most undercapitalized
businesses bankruptcy.
Secondly, we expect to invest heavily
in state-of-the-art technological systems so that we do not face new
hardware/software changes early in our business development. Stan Caterbone will
devote much of his management time to this area. Priority will be given to
reviewing performance against objectives on a monthly basis. All objectives will be
quantifiable and measurable, and as necessary adjustments will be made and
monitored accordingly. Such scrutiny of performance will allow us to constantly
assess and respond to any possible shortcomings and to market needs. Our
management is committed to deriving a large portion of its personal income from
serving clients as opposed to relying on management income. This should preserve
our cash flow and insure its growth. BIOGRAPHY OF STANLEY J. CATERBONE Stanley J. Caterbone is currently
proprietor of S. J. Caterbone Associates, a Financial Planning Firm specializing in but
not limited to upper income individuals. He is also president and founder of Fro
Financial Group, Ltd., a firm providing financial services and contractual
negotiations to Professional Athletes and Agents. Stan began his career
with a financial subsidiary of American Express, IDS Financial Services. He was hired
by and worked with Bob Kauffman for six months before Bob was promoted to the
Florida area. Stan developed a practice centered around fee-based planning that
focused on the tax aspects and concerns of individuals while they pertained to the
clients investments and overall financial situation. While at IDS, Stan was one of the
leading planners in the nation to utilize fee based planning at its inception. He was
one of the top producers in central Pennsylvania, and ranked number 5 in the nation
in his class. He also had closed one of the biggest estate planning cases in the
division. In January 1985, Stan left IDS and became independent to provide a
better product line for his clients and to escape the proprietary environment. He is
very creative and has developed a strong practice among physicians. Stan
has developed a variety of professional networks throughout the country with
regard to the various Sports Professionals that he works with. He is currently
working on a joint venture with former Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of
Doubledav Publishing Company. Richard E. Madigan. He is looking to Stan to help
him manage an annual income of $7 million from the 20 Professional Athletes that
he currently nonages. Stan has helped to develop the Central Pennsylvania
Chapter of the International Association of Financial Planning, and had organized
and Attracted more than 100 persons to attend a dinner meeting with Alexandria
Armstrong, one of the more prominent Financial Planners in the nation, who is
currently the National President of the IAFP. He is also a member of the Estate
Planning Council of the Institute of Certified Financial Planners. Stan is currently a
Certified Contract Advisor of the National Football league Flayers Association and
the NBA. Stan will be an Executive Vice President responsible for professional
networking and marketing and sane of the fiscal and negotiating
functions. BIOGRAPHY OF
ROBERT E. KAUFFMAN Bob Kauffman is currently the National Sales
Manager, at large, for FSC Securities Corporation. FSC is a broker-dealer with a 1200
planner sales force. It raised over 600 million dollars of investment capital in 1986.
Bob's responsibilities include developing a company-owned distribution system
whereby FSC products and services are delivered to the public-at-large through FSC
Financial Service Centers. Bob is also responsible for recruiting proven financial
planners throughout the nation for Financial Service Corporation. He also
contributes to the strategic planning of sales for FSC Securities
Corporation. Bob began his career with a financial subsidiary of the American
Express Corporation in 1976 upon his graduation from Millersville State College in
Millersville, Pennsylvania. In his four years of direct selling to the public, he became
the youngest person in the company to achieve multi-million dollar production
status at the age of 25. Bob then began to take on additional associates as he
began to build his practice in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. In just two years, his practice
had grown to 12 representatives handling over $12 million dollars a year in annual
investments and managing in excess of $60 million dollars of client monies. While
building this operation, Bob continued to be the leading producer in his office and
the region. Bob was then promoted to division manager of the West Coast. In
that position, he tripled the size of the sales force and increased volume over 500%
in a period of 2 years. His division of American Express handled over $100 million
dollars of investor monies. Bob was then asked to take over the largest
operation in the southeast, located in Atlanta in 1984. With over 60 financial
planners, handling an excess of $200 million dollars of investor's monies, Bob again
evolved his territory into the top echelon of the company. With FSC since
1985, Bob has opened the first three company-owned offices and now supervises an
excess of 75 employees. His operations now rank 4th in all FSC related planning
operations. Bob brings to Financial Management Group, Inc. 10 years of experience
in the financial planning industry in both sales and sales management. He is a
member of the International Association of Financial Planners and is in the process
of completing the course work for Certified Financial Planners designation. Bob is a
frequent speaker at both corporation and business financial planning functions and
has been quoted frequently in local and national media publications. He continues
to handle investments for select clients. Bob will serve as
president, chairman of the board and will be the largest stockholder. His experience
in managing and developing large financial service organizations will provide the
leadership and expertise necessary to insure the growth we envision. BIOGRAPHY OF MICHAEL M. HARTLETT, CFP Mike Hartlett is currently an
independent financial planner and heads his own local firmFinancial Planning
Consultants. Mike is a licensed securities principal and folly a licensed securities
broker. He has completed the Certified Financial Planning program with the College
for Financial Planning and currently holds an Associate Financial Planner
designation. He will receive the Certified Financial Planner designation in February
1987. Hike began his Financial Planning carper five years ago with IDS a
subsidiary of American Express. During his career with IDS he was among the firm's
top planners. He was on the Presidents Advisory Council for IDS in 1985 and from a
field of over 5,200 IDS planners, finished among the top 66 financial planners in the
country. In 1983 and 1984 he was among the top three in IRA/Qualified Plan
Production. In September, 1985 he left IDS to form his own financial planning
firm. Mike has an extensive knowledge of corporate retirement plans and
pension programs and has excelled in retirement planning for individuals. He
conducts financial planning seminars in several large Lancaster County corporations
and is active in promoting financial planning in Lancaster County. Mike
currently manages in excess of $14 million in client assets. Mike is committed to delivering the highest quality
planning services to his clients. He believes that personal attention and service are
the key to a strong client/planner relationship. Mike will serve as Executive vice President of Financial Management
Group, Ltd. He will be in charge of operations and serve as chief financial
officer. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, LTD.
Subsidiaries (Exhibit
A) Financial Securities, Inc; The Broker Dealer FMG Advisory, Inc., The Registered Investment
Advisor Financial Services Insurance
Agency; The Insurance Agency FMG Accounting Services, Inc.; The Accounting
Firm Financial Mortgages Services,
Inc.; The Mortgage Brokerage Firm Wealth Management Services, Inc.; The Portfolio Manager & Market Timer Financial Planning Consultants, Inc.; The
Financial Planning Firm AFFILIATE FIRMS (In
House) Berger Real Estate;
Real Estate Services O'Day & Smith;
Legal Counsel for Business & Real Estate Shirk, Reist, Wagenseller & Shirk; Legal Counsel for
Estate Planning Lovell Associates, Inc;
Property & Casualty Services Fro Financial
Group, Ltd., (Stan Caterbone); Services for Professional
Athletes <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"><div style="text-align:
center;">McNEES, WALLACE & NURICK </div><div style="text-align: center;">ATTORNEYS AT LAW 100 Pine Street P. O. BOX 1166 Harrisburg, PA.
I71O8 - 1166 TELEPHONE (717) 332-8OOO </div> July 31, 1986 In re: Financial
Management Group, Ltd. Draft Offering Memorandum Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone 255 Butler Avenue Lancaster, PA
17601 Dear Stan: I have now reviewed the draft Offering Memorandum
for Financial Management Group, Ltd., which I received several days ago, and my
comments follow. The cover page indicates that stock will be sold at
two different prices, but it should include reference to the fact that the lesser-priced
shares will be offered to persons who will affiliate with one or more of the
subsidiaries. This can be done by a brief notation on the cover, together with a
cross-reference to the section in the Memorandum where is subject will be
discussed more fully. There should be a rather-full discussion somewhere in the
document indicating the qualifications and requirements pertaining to persons who
desire to become affiliated, and as we discussed, this also should be incorporated
into a form of agreement or agreements, which should be attached as an exhibit. In
this connection, should people who affiliate and later terminate be required to sell
their stock back to the corporation? On the cover you refer to
the sale of *units*rather than shares of common stock, and the document reflects
the possibility of offering warrants. If you intend to offer units consisting of stock
and warrants, the cover page should clearly indicate, and the document should also
be clear on that point, and contain a description of the warrants The Memorandum should be much more descriptive
in outlining the proposed activities of each of the subsidiaries. In that connection, I
suggest with respect to each subsidiary the following information: 2. More detailed information on Just what each subsidiary will
do. 3. Likewise, where applicable, ore specific information. as to
licenses and regulatory requirements (if any) which must be met and continually
observed by the subsidiary. 4. A discussion identifying the directors and
officers and also who will manage its business operations. If formal arrangements
have been made with specific persons, so indicate; if the business will be operated
by an employee or independent contractor yet to be designated, give details,
including the terms of employment that are expected for any such person. In this
connection, I would think you would indicate the possible difficulty of retaining such
persons as one of the risk factors. Also, if such persons will continue to operate or
be connected with the businesses from which they come, you will have to point out
the possibility of a conflict of interest on their part. Further, it is my impression that
these businesses are highly competitive. All in all, you should discuss among
yourselves what type of information about the proposed businesses a sophisticated
potential investor would want to know, and then state your response in writing.
Obviously, I would err in favor of more, rather than less, discussion. With
reference to the parent corporation, you should give detail similar to that you will
give for the subsidiaries. Further, you may want to discuss how the parent will
"manage" the subsidiaries; that is, whether each subsidiary will be largely
autonomous or whether parent 'company officers a personnel will be directly
involved with the subsidiaries' activities. With further reference to
"risk factors". I would think you would add a section stating that all of the business
activities are in fields that are highly competitive. Also, I would think you should
state that, while the founders have had considerable experience in certain of the
activities, they have not had such experience with respect to all of the other
subsidiaries' proposed businesses; further, I presume none has had experience in
managing a group of companies and business activities such as is contemplated in
this case. With respect to the use of proceeds, you should consider a further,
breakdown of at least some of the components "working capital" category for
which $187,000 is allocated, which is a relatively large amount. Among other
thoughts, you might refer to the lease obligation (and any other present or
contemplated contractual obligations), wages for secretaries and the like, and
professional expenses (e.g., legal and accounting). As discussed, and in relation to the use of proceeds, you will have to
deal with the matter of the salaries to be paid to key management personnel. I note
your disclosure that each will receive a salary not exceeding $60,000, but that
raises the possibility that virtually all of the working capital could be used for that
purpose. If I were a prospective investor, I would want additional information, as I
would be concerned about the potential use of a large part of the proceeds to pay
salaries. I would also ask to what extent revenues generated by the businesses
would be able to pay part or all of the salaries. Perhaps one approach, if agreeable,
would be to disclose that not more than half (for example) of the salaries paid
during the two years would be from proceeds of the offering. Under the
"Business discussion, you make reference to legal services as one of the fields of
activity for the corporation. You will want to check with legal counsel who would be
involved, but I am doubtful that under professional standards your corporation can
offer legal services. As I review the "Business* section, and as a potential
investor, I would want to know more about how solid the arrangements are with
"planner and affiliates", and also
have some idea of the timetable by which the corporation believes it can begin to
engage in business. With reference to
"Management", you need to identify the Board of Directors. Also, you should
indicate whether management will provide full-time services, and If not, what
approximate percentage of their time is expected to be devoted to the
organization's business. The biographical
summaries, in my view, should be toned down in order to be somewhat more
"matter of fact" in tone. In this section, as In the rest: of the document, you must be
able to support each fact that is stated, and some of the disclosures are a bit
vague. An example is the reference to j Bob Kauffman "handling over $12,000,000
of investment monies per year" and having "an asset base of up to $60,000,000.
Also, while you do indicate the functions each of the three of you will have, I think it
would be useful to be a bit more specific. With respect to "Certain
Transactions", you must be sure to disclose fully any arrangement or situation
pursuant to which any director or officer will have dealings directly or indirectly with
the corporation. For example, if any of you will continue to be retained by your
present employer. Sincerely, McNEES,
WALLACE & NURICK WJJ:jp Enclosures <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"><div
style="text-align: center;">MCNEES, WALLACE & NURICK </div><div style="text-align: center;">ATTORNEYS AT LAW 100 Pine Street P. O. BOX
Verdana;">Harrisburg, PA. I71O8 - 1166 Telephone (717) 332-
8OOO </div> <div style="text-align: center;">August 7, 1986 </div> In Re: Financial Management Group, Ltd. Our File
No: 11489-001-5 Stanley J. Caterbone, Executive
Vice President Financial Management Group, Ltd. 1755 Oregon Pike Lancaster. PA
style="font-family: Verdana;">As we discussed, it will be necessary to file five
copies of Form D not later than 15 days after the first sale of securities in the
proposed limited offering. This requirement is summarized in the first paragraph of
Form D, a partially completed copy, which is enclosed. We will discuss the actual
mechanics of filing, as veil as completion of the form, after you have reviewed the
enclosed. Please also note from that paragraph that it is necessary to make one or
more additional filings as the offering progresses. and is completed. This will be
your responsibility, as only you will know how long the offering will continue and
when it is completed. It is most important to make these filings in a complete and
timely manner, as failure to do so will make the exemption under SEC Regulation D
unavailable, and therefore may result in a violation of the registration provisions of
the Securities Act of 1933 and, consequentially, potential liability for the directors
and officers. You will note that in several places I did not have sufficient
information to complete the form, and I will rely on you to supply this information. I
have marked where these items appear. In particular, you will have to complete
Page 5, which requires you to itemize the offering expenses/and then allocate the
use of proceeds. You will note that it is permitted to estimate these amounts*
although in the supplemental filings the estimates should be revised to reflect
actual figures. Please review this document closely, as it is my strong
suggestion that the document should be complete and ready for filing before 1
leave for vacation. You will then be in a position to file the five copies directly with
the SEC as soon as the first sale has occurred. Tour signature should go at the end
of the form where indicated, but please do not date the form. Sincerely, McNEES, WALLACE & NURICK WJJ:jp Enclosures <hr style="width:
100%; height: 2px;"><div style="text-align: center;">MCNEES, WALLACE &
NURICK </div><div style="text-
align: center;">ATTORNEYS AT
LAW </div><div style="text-align:
center;"> 100 Pine Street P. O. BOX 1166 Harrisburg, PA. I71O8 -
Verdana;">Telephone (717) 332-8OOO </div> <div style="text-align:
center;">August 7, 1986 </div> In Re: Financial Management Group. Ltd. Our File
No: 11489-001-5 Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone
 Financial Management Group, Ltd. 1755 Oregon Pike L ancaster, PA
style="font-family: Verdana;">The purpose of this letter is to address generally the
requirements you must meet in connection with the actual offer and sale of
securities by the corporation pursuant to the exemption under Section 203(d) of the
Pennsylvania Securities Act of 1972 with respect to which a filing has been, or is
about to be, made with the Pennsylvania Securities Commission. As an
initial matter, as you are aware no sales may occur until the materials have been
"cleared" by the Pennsylvania Securities Commission. That will occur Initially via a
telephone call from the Commission staff to our office, at which point we will advise
you. Thereafter, the staff will send a letter of confirmation. Alternatively, as we have
discussed, it may be necessary to deal with one or more staff comments before
clearance can be obtained. At the point clearance has been obtained, you may
distribute copies of the Offering Memorandum subject to the numerical limitations
of Section 203(d) and regulations there under. As we discussed, the Memoranda
should be numbered consecutively, and the number and name of the recipient of
each copy should be recorded in your records and written on the upper-right hand
corner of the Memorandum in the spaces provided. Under Pennsylvania
Securities Commission regulations, you are required to keep this type of record;
specifically, you must maintain a list shoving (i) the name and address of each
offeree, (ii) the name of the person making the offer, and (ill) the date the offer is
made. As he previously discussed, the numerical restrictions are that a maximum of
90 offers and 35 sales may he made to Pennsylvania residents in any twelve month
period. The foregoing relates only to offers and sales made in Pennsylvania, and
in the event you intend to make any offers or sales elsewhere, it will be necessary
for a review to be made of the applicable state "blue sky" securities law. Certain of
such state statutes permit a small number of offers and/or sales to be made without
requiring any filings, while other states require filings to be made either before or
after offers or sales are made. In all events, you should be very alert to this matter,
and determine state securities law requirements before approaching prospective
investors in other jurisdictions. As far as federal securities
laws are concerned, as we have discussed it will be necessary to file Form D with
the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 15 days after the initial sale
is made in the offering. We must rely on you to alert us when such initial sale has
occurred; as of course we have no independent means of knowing when that has
occurred. Accordingly, please call Mike Jarman or me as soon as the first sale
actually occurs. Section 203(d) of the Pennsylvania Securities Act prohibits
"public m
d
a advertisement" and "mass mailing" in connection with the solicitation of investors.
Similarly, SEC Regulation D, which in effect provides the exemption from federal
registration upon which reliance is being made, prohibits "any form of general
solicitation or general advertising", including published or broadcast ads or notices
and seminars whose attendees have been invited by any general solicitation or
advertising. As the offering continues, the offering materials must be updated
by supplement or amendment to advise investors of material changes affecting any
of the disclosures. I hope this general outline
will be of use, and of course if you have any questions or need any further
information, please let us know. McNEES,
WALLACE & NURICK WJJ:jp Enclosures <hr
style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"><div style="text-align: center;">LAW OFFICES SEIDEL, GONDA, GOLDHAMMER & ABBOTT, P.C. PATENT AND
TRADEMARK ATTORNEYS SUITE 1800 TWO PENN CENTER PLAZA PHILADELPHIA,
PA. 19102 June 22, 1987 </div> Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone FMG Advisory, Inc.
Verdana;">Eden Park II 1755 Oregon Pike Lancaster, PA 17601 RE:Service Mark
Search for "FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GROUP" Our File: 7351-
G Dear Stan: As requested, I
have completed a search in respect to the above-referenced service mark. The
results of that search are annexed hereto. It is my understanding
that the mark "FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
GROUP" is used for services of providing a complete package of legal,
accounting, real estate, insurance, stock brokerage, portfolio management, market
timing, financial planning, mortgage banking and investment banking to business
firms. Based upon the results of the enclosed search, it is my opinion that you
can adopt and use the mark in this region of the United States.' It is a close question
as to whether the mark is federally registrable. Moreover, you may anticipate
difficulty in using the mark in California, Arizona, Georgia and Illinois. The possibility
of opposition to your use of the mark also exists for the states of Louisiana and
Oregon. The reasons for my opinion are explained below. If the only consideration
were federal registration, then I would say that the mark is probably registrable. The
closest registered mark is "FINANCIAL MANAGERS SOCIETY". The marks differ only
by the last word, and "SOCIETY" and "GROUP" arguably have a similar connotation.
But your services are fairly distinguishable from those of the registered mark. Thus,
on a federal level, the major objection to an application to register may be an
argument that your mark is descriptive of the services being offered. Descriptive
marks are not registrable unless by virtue of their long use and heavy promotion
they have become distinctive. However, there is at least a fair argument that
"FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GROUP" is merely suggestive, not descriptive. The
more difficult problem arises in respect to the fact that there are others using
"FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GROUP" or slight variants thereof. See for example
California state registration No. 14070 for "THE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GROUP".
See also the listing 'of four companies under the name "FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
GROUP" in California, Louisiana and Oregon. Moreover, there are "FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT GROUPs" listed in the telephone book for Atlanta, Georgia and
Chicago, Illinois. Whether or not these other users remain in business, and whether
or not they offer services competitive with yours, is nearly impossible to evaluate on
the limited facts available from the report. Thus, the risks exist that should you
enter into one or more of these companies geographical market areas, they may
assert a claim of prior rights. If, on the other hand, you will not as a practical
matter be trading in these market areas for the foreseeable future, then I
recommend proceeding with an application to register the mark. If we are
successful in obtaining such registration, then your right to use the mark can
ultimately become incontestable if not for the prior users market areas, then for the
rest of the United States. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions
concerning the foregoing. With kindest personal regards, I am sincerely yours,
Verdana;">SEIDEL, GONDA, GOLDHAMMER
& ABBOTT, P.C. JOEL S. GOLDHAMMER JSG:md Enclosure <hr
style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"><div style="text-align: center;">FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GROUP,
Ltd. FINANCIAL FORECAST As of June 1987 1 Month Prior To
1st Year Anniversary </div> 
 SALES


 1987
 1989
 Present Capitol
Raised $54
Million $100 Million $80
Million Total Commissions $2.7
Million $5.0 Million
$3.5 Million Affiliate
Earnings $ .3
Million $1.0
Million $ .5 Million Total Gross Earnings
 $3.0 Million $6.0
Million $4.0 Million Revenues Less
Comm. $ .76 Million $1.5
Million
N/A SALES FORCE Manpower

 37 Persons 50 Persons
 48 Persons Hires

 10 Persons 14 Persons
 14 Hires Retention

 90%
 85%
 95% Average Sales/Person
$81,085 $120,000
$85,000 FINANCIALS (All Numbers in Millions of Dollars) Gross Revenue

 3.0 6.0

 4.0 Net Revenue
 .76
 1.8
 N/A Retained
Earnings .21
 .501
 N/A Return on
Equity
 70% 66.6%

N/A Capital Base
 .300
 .725
 .300 Book Value Begin

 .300 .725
 .300 Book Value/Share
 1.60
 3.05
 4.00 Book Value/End

 .480 1.526
 N/A Shares
Outstanding 300,000
 450,000
245,000 Value Per Share
 $5.60 $10.67
 $14.00 (at 3.5 X
Book) Value Per Share
 $10.00 $13.33
 $17.00 (at Industry 1 X Gross
Commission) <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"><div style="font-
weight: bold; text-align: center; font-family: Comic Sans MS;">pennsylvania </div></div></div><div style="text-align:
justify;"><div style="text-align: center;"> Bar association </div><div
style="text-align: center;">100 South Street, Post Office Box 186 Harrisburg, PA 17108 Telephone
(717) 238-6715 </div> COMMITTEE ON
LEGAL ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY Chairman Michael A.
Bloom Vice Chairman James M. Houston PBA Liaison Ronald
Fothgoes <div style="text-align: center;">
September 19, 1986 </div> PERSONAL AND
CONFIDENTIAL Kenelm L. Shirk, Jr., Esquire
Verdana;">Shirk, Reist, Wagenseller and Shirk P.O. Box 1552 Lancaster,
Pennsylvania 17603-1552 Re: Financial Management Group,
Ltd., Dear Ken: This letter is in reply to
your inquiry of August 6, 1986 which inquiry enclosed a copy of the "Charter
Business Plan for The Financial Management Group, Ltd. dated July 1, 1986. You
have requested advice concerning the ethical implications for a lawyer associating
with The Financial Management Group, Ltd. Briefly, in review of the materials which you provided, The Financial
Management Group, Ltd. ("FMG') seeks to position itself as a "major provider and
servicer of financial products and advice in the closely-related fields of investments,
financial consultation, mortgage banking, life insurance, property and casualty
insurance, taxes, law, and real estate". It is the intention of FMG to retain in-house
legal and real estate professionals to assist financial planners -in rendering advice
to clients, in the words of the Plan, "without fear of losing the client to outside
interests." Identified as part of the "Support Services* which FMG intends to provide
to clients, is so-called "professional networking" described by FMG as the use of "in-
house affiliates in law, accounting, tax", etc., to serve clients and their related
financial needs. The FMG proposals specifically identify so-called "affiliate firms"
which include a real estate entity and two law firms, one of whom is identified as
"Legal Counsel for Business & Real Estate" and the other firm is identified as
'Legal Counsel for Estate Planning". A true and correct copy of the Charter Business
Plan of PMG is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A". At the outset of our evaluation, certain points should
be made clear. First, a lawyer is entitled to engage in businesses other than the
practice of law provided that the lawyer keeps such enterprises entirely separate
from the lawyer's independent practice of law. One of the problems which an
"affiliated" lawyer may face in associating with any such financial services provider
is the importance under the Code of Professional Responsibility of maintaining the
lawyer's independent professional judgment on behalf of a client where, for
example, it may be argued that the lawyer can be said to benefit because the
tendering of advice may give rise to the purchase of financial service products from
FMG. Dnder those circumstances, the lawyer may be subject to charges of conflicts
of interest arising under DR 5-101 which provides, in pertinent part, that: "a lawyer
shall not accept employment if the exercise of his professional judgment on behalf
of his client will be or reasonably may be affected by his own financial, business,
property, or personal interests." Of equal concern is the ethical requirement
prohibiting in-person solicitation of a prospective client with whom the attorney
does not enjoy a present or former attorney-client relationship. There appears to be
a likelihood that FMG will directly solicit, on an in-person basis, clients with whom
your law firm has no present or past attorney-client relationship which may subject
you to the charge that FMG has done for you indirectly what you are prohibited from
doing directly. Certainly, we cannot opine that there is no risk of violation based on
the foregoing assumed facts. Additionally,
one must take care to avoid any ownership interest in FMG mindful of the
prohibition contained in DR 5-107 that a lawyer shall not engage in the practice of
law for profit if a non-lawyer owns any interest therein. Accordingly, compensation
for legal services rendered should be made on a fee for service basis or other
objective format, avoiding any possible charge of joint ownership of the
venture. It is also important that the
confidentiality of information developed during the course of the client
representation fay your law firm be held secret and confidential in accordance with
DR 4-101. Accordingly, disclosure of the estate planning needs of clients should be
done with the express written consent of the client, particularly where a charge may
later be made by a disgruntled client that such information was misutilized in order
to induce the client to purchase financial services products sold by FMG (on which
FMG may be entitled to commissions or fees). Moreover, to the extent FMG earns
such fees or commissions, full disclosure of FMG's interest in the sale of such
financial services products should be made by the attorney pursuant to the
attorney's independent obligation to provide the client with competent advice and a
duty of loyal representation. As you may sense, this brief reply to your inquiry
identifies only some of the ethical problems which may exist in connection with the
proposed structure. It is not intended, by this letter, however, to
discourage such enterprises. To the contrary, it is believed that, carefully structured,
lawyers are free to participate in such ventures. Should you require a more detailed
opinion, we request that you provide us with specific questions about proposed
courses of conduct so that we may be responsive to them. Should you have
any questions concerning this preliminary reply, please contact me. I
remain Sincerely, Michael A. Bloom pdh Enclosure <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"><div style="text-align:
center;">BUSINESS
PROPERTY LEASE BY AND BETWEEN EDEN PARK ASSOCIATES
II (A Pennsylvania Genera!
Partnership) AS LESSOR AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, LTD. (A Pennsylvania Business Corporation) and MICHAEL M. HARTLETT, Individual STANLEY J. CATERBONE, Individual and ROBERT E. KAUFFMAN,
Individual AS TENANT With Five (5) Year Personal Guaranty FOR EDEN PARK
II </div> The submission by Lesser to Tenant of a proposed
lease shall have no binding force or effect, shall not constitute an option for the
leasing of the premises, nor confer any rights or Impose arty obligations upon either
party until the execution of a lease agreement by Lessor and die delivery of an
executed original copy thereof to Tenant or Its representative. Furthermore, the
parties shall not be bound by any written or oral representations between them,
directly or through any representation, except as specifically incorporated in the
lease agreement referred to above. Personal Guaranty The undersigned hereby
unconditionally guaranty for a period of five (5) years from the date of
commencement of the prompt performance of the obligations of the Tenant when
the prompt performance of the obligations of the Tenant when any alterations or
modifications thereof, which alterations may be made without notice to or the
consent of the Lease and said alterations and modifications are hereafter named
Lease. The liability for the Undersigned hereunder is conditional and shall not be
affected in any way by prior reason to retain or preserve, or the lack of prior
enforcement of, to retain or preserve, or the lack of prior enforcement of, any
person or persons, (including the Tenant and any of the any property, (b) the
invalidity of any such rights which may be obtained, (c) any delay in enforcing or
failure to enforce only if such rights are thereby lost, or (d) any delay in the
Undersigned for payment for the Undersigned obligations. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNTY OF
LANCASTER I HEREBY CERTIFY, that on this
before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public for the aforesaid State and County,
personally appeared Raymond E. Ix, who acknowledged himself to be the Managing
General Partner of Eden Park Associates II, a Pennsylvania general partnership, and
that he as such Managing General Partner, being authorized to do so, executed the
foregoing Guaranty for the purposes therein contained on behalf of the
partnership. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my hand and seal the
day and year first above written. <hr style="width: 100%; height:
2px;"> </div>
GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
<div style="font-weight: bold; text-align: center;">Candidate Questionnaire for the County of
Lancaster Pennsylvania Government Study Commission (July 24, 2006) </div> <div style="text-align: center;">PLEASE READ THE CANDIDATE
SELECTION CRITERIA AS PUT FORTH BY THE LANCASTER COUNTY CITIZENS FOR
GOVERNMENT STUDY (available on our website at www.lccgs.org, under the
Candidates Information tab). </div> IN A PARAGRAPH,
PLEASE DESCRIBE WHY ARE YOU INTERESTED IN SERVING ON THE GOVERNMENT
STUDY COMMISSION? <div style="text-align: justify;">I am very interested in being part of a solution to
restore credibility, honesty and integrity to local government; which would result in
a better Lancaster County for all. For the past 19 years I have been studying and
evaluating the merits of local government and how it effects the community-at-
large; due in large part to an experience that required me to do the same. I have a
unique perspective on how the ill effects of disingenuous decisions escalate to the
point where our current Commissioners become marred in controversy and legal
problems muting their credibility, trust and performance. Whether a restructure of
our current system is the answer remains to be seen. My belief is that corruption
and cronyism plays a vital role to the problems that confront us. A restructuring must incorporate a system of checks
and balances to improve the sense of governance that now is at an all time low for
this county. There must be cooperation between city and county government that
places the priority of greater good to all leaders and politicians in making
decisions that affect all Lancastrians. The Lancaster Convention Center project is a
prime example of what can happen when this is not the case. There is no excuse
why the revitalization of downtown Lancaster is stalled. Although you can take a
survey of individual projects that have surpassed initial expectations; the Clipper
Stadium, Liberty Street Commons, James Street District, etc,. There lacks a clear
and decisive synergy that leads one to question when we will see the thriving
Downtown of yesterday. Most of the pieces seem to be in place, but a lack of vision
and leadership is stalling a real revitalization that is deserving of all Lancastrians.
Cooperation and synergy is the missing ingredient in my opinion. I am hopeful that
a restructuring or the evaluation of the merits of a restructuring will provide some
insights to that problem. </div> OF THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES,
PLEASE CHECK ALL THAT APPLY TO YOUR BACKGROUND: Legal; Financial;
Community Advocate; Social Service; Business; Real Estate;
Construction HOW HAS ALL
THAT WAS CHECKED ABOVE PREPARED YOU TO SERVE ON THE GOVERNMENT STUDY
COMMISSION?: <div style="text-align: justify;">I posses a diverse background that demonstrates a unique
experience to evaluate and develop strategic and tactical planning to a wide variety
of problems. I am an expert in technologies and have used that expertise to provide
consulting to a wide variety of clients throughout the United States and beyond. I
have been involved with analyzing and developing solutions to a host of problems
that are similar to this initiative. I have founded organizations and served on boards
that demonstrate leadership skills. I was one of the
founders of the Central Pennsylvania Chapter of Financial Planners and served
ccordingly; as well as Financial Management Group, Ltd., Advanced Media Group (a
former affiliate of the High Group of Companies), and Global Entertainment Group. I
am also very active with Toms Project Hope. All can be seen at the website
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com . </div> WHAT ARE YOUR STRENGTHS,
ASSETS AND/OR PHILOSOPHIES TOWARD WORKING WITH A DIVERSE GROUP OF
VOLUNTEERS TOWARD A COMMON GOAL? <div style="text-align:
justify;">I readily acknowledge that a spirit of
cooperation is vital to an initiative with the scope of mission that you are initiating. I
have always had the firm belief that disagreements are necessary to reach a
consensus that will ultimately lead to a viable solution. You do not learn anything by
listening or conversing with only people that are in agreement on the issues at
hand; and compromise is vital to ensuring that long-term solutions are embedded
for a foundation of future growth. I am an expert in analysis and forecasting a wide
array of matters with demonstrated success. My tainted reputation must not
prejudice my application for this initiative. I have filed a Civil Rights Complaint with
the Office of the Attorney General that precedes this. Please visit
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com. Further questions and or specific request
to substantiate any of my claims may be forwarded. </div>
SONY JOINT VENTURE
<div style="text-align: center; font-family: Verdana;">SEIDEL, GONDA, GOLDHAMMER & ABBOTT, P. C, PATENT AND
TRADEMARK ATTORNEYS SUITE I500 TWO PENN CENTER
PLAZA PHILADELPHIA, PA. 19IO2 June 25, 1987 </div> Mr.
Stanley Caterbone, President FMG Advisory,
Inc. Eden Park II 1755 Oregon Avenue Lancaster, PA 17601 RE: Power Station Our File: 7351-G Dear Stan: <div style="text-align: justify; font-
family: Verdana;">I have now received the results of a search pertaining to the
above subject. I have also reviewed the file forwarded with your letter of May 29.
The following is my analysis and evaluation of the right to use Power Station as
defined below. As I understand the situation, your business client, Power
Station Studio, has, since 1977, operated a recording studio with a widely regarded
reputation for providing high quality recording services using state of the art
equipment. The enclosed report reveals that Power Station studio has registered the
trademark "Power Station" for sound recording studios. (See Reg. No. 1,433,328
registered March 17, 1987.) You have asked me to investigate the possibility of
Power Station expanding the use of its mark into men's and women's clothing
including beachwear; and for audio and video electronics for consumers and
professionals. I have assumed that this latter category includes radios, television
receivers, video cassette recorders, audio recorders, compact disc players, turn
tables, amplifiers, receivers, tuners, control panels, mixing boards and consoles,
among other things. Based upon the results of the enclosed search, it is
my opinion that it would be inadvisable for Power Station, Inc. to use its mark for
clothing as aforesaid. The basis for my opinion is Registration No. 1,431,242
registered March 3, 1987 for "Power Station". The registrant claims a first date of
use of April 3, 1986 for women's clothing including swimwear and other goods as
listed. Although your client has a strong reputation, and although it has
priority of use for the mark, this registrant has a strong position for arguing that it
has superior rights for women's clothing. One would not ordinarily associate clothing
in any way with recording, studio services. Thus, your client's rights in its mark do
not appear to dominate those of the registrant's. Accordingly, use of the Power
Station mark for women's (or men's) clothing would involve a significant risk of
being accused of trademark infringement. Use of the Power Station mark
for consumer and professional audio and visual electronic equipment raises some
issues, but on the whole I am of the opinion that it is permissible. Again, I assume,
as I have been informed, that the Power Station studio is well known and does have
a good reputation for its existing services. Given that, its movement into electronic
equipment should be permissible. Here the good will associated with its current
services can be more readily extended to audio visual electronic
equipment. The search reveals that Manville Corporation's Ken Caryl
Ranch is the owner of the mark "Power Station" for battery operated emergency
electrical power supply units. See Reg. No. 1,040,308 registered May 25, 1976 and
claiming a first date of use of November 23, 1970. In my opinion/ audiovisual
electronic equipment can be considered to be sufficiently unrelated to emergency
electrical power supply units to avoid a likelihood of confusion even though the
marks are identical. I reach the same conclusion regarding the pending
application by Electrical Conductors, Inc. for a multiple outlet power strip. A closer
question is raised by Gould's Supplemental Register registration for Power Station
for mini and microcomputers. Gould's mark is registered on the Supplemental
Register undoubtedly because "Power Station" as applied to computer equipment is
considered to be descriptive. A Supplemental Register registration has none of the
procedural benefits of a Principle Register registration. Moreover, if Gould's use of
the mark is limited to a particular market which Is distinct from your clients/ there
does not appear to be a likelihood of confusion. Thus, Gould may be selling its
computers into a specialized commercial market if it is presently selling computers
at all. Next I call your attention to the fact that several radio stations have
adopted and are using the trademark "The Power Station" in various cities
throughout the United States. Conceivably, these radio stations could object to the
introduction of consumer electronics into their market area on the ground that the
use 'of the same mark implies sponsorship by them. I note that all of these marks
were recently registered, and I suspect that all of these radio stations are related or
commonly owned. I also suspect that the adoption of this mark may be of recent
vintage. Thus, your client in any negotiation with these people would have the
advantage of being a prior user, and the relationship between recording services
and electronic equipment on the one hand and radio station services and electronic
equipment on the other hand is at least co-equal. Thus, your client should have the
dominant position. In view of the foregoing, it is my opinion that The
Power Station should not adopt or use "Power Station" for men's and women's
clothing, but it may adopt and use the mark for professional and consumer
electronics as described above with the understanding that the matter is not
entirely without doubt and issues could arise. It is, however, my opinion, based
upon the facts presently available to me, that The Power Station, Inc. should prevail
if those issues arise. If you have any questions concerning the foregoing,
please feel free to call me. </div>With
kindest personal regards, 





 Sincerely
yours, 





 SEIDEL, GONDA,
GOLDHAMMER & ABBOTT, P.C. <hr
style="width: 100%; height: 2px; font-family: Verdana;"><div style="text-align:
center;">SONY CORPORATION DIGITAL MOVIE JOINT VENTURE PROPOSAL July 1987 </div>I, Scope of Project II. Marketing and
Distribution III. Financial Proposal IV. Contracts Tony Bongiovi and Power Station Studio is about to
undertake one of the most interesting projects in the entertainment industry that
the Business World has ever seen. His fascinating elements of this project are as
follows: A).Musical Overtones B),
Technology C). Marketing and Distribution D). Limited Downside Bisk
Potential <div style="text-align: justify; font-family: Verdana;">When you put all
of the above elements together in any business venture you have a very strong and
powerful entity. Now, put the above elements in one of the largest and most visible
industries available in the Entertainment Industry. SONY OBJECTIVES We
want to position Sony as the printer manufacturer of Professional Recording
Equipment in both the Record Industry and also the Theatrical and Video Industry as
well as Television and Pay TV. In addition and even mare important we would like to
credit Sony with contributing in the development of the Sony/PSDMS Digital
Recording System that will recognized throughout the World by way of several
different medium exposures. This will have tremendous effects in the way of
increased sales in both the Consumer/Retail level as well as the Professional
Environment. SCOPE OF PROJECT In the following paragraphs I will
address the above elements and prove to support the potential for this project. The
Movie was developed to help Tony Bongiovi take his creative and genius talents in
the music industry to capture other industry's that are complimentary - theatrical,
television and cable, video, international film and now electronics manufacturing.
Because of Tonys -track record and accomplishments in both technology and
musical production Bon Jovi! The film already will have appeal through the
feature of his latest band French Lick. Tony has used the same musical format for
their first album as he used for Ben Jovi, which has sold nine ail lion albums thus far
no album has ever sold sore albums in its first six months in the history of the
recording industry. Because of the timing of the album which will dominate the
musical score the two should and will compliment one another very profitably! To
further the marketability of the picture he wrapped this into a horror script widest
marketability due to international distribution and an element that will prevent
the "critics" from influencing the audiences! To add further to the project,
Tory will produce the first movie ever with a digital sound track from set to theatre
and video. This technology alone would cost anyone else 190% of the total budget
just for the sound production. This is when the project gets interesting as far as
marketing and distribution is concerned. Because of the exclusivity of the technical
elements and the "band", the marketing and distribution should be powerful alone
in even the most conventional deals. MARKETING AND
DISTRIBUTION Now lets take this project and look at it with regards to
two elements: a). Video Industry b). Digital recording and
playing The video industry is a 56 billion dollar industry that is in need of
product, when you look at the potential for a product that will be the first actual
product that will compliment the fast paced VCR/Stereo Entertainment components
with a Musical score that nay have enough merits of its ownyou have an amazing
potential for distribution! The Digital and Disc Industry has proven to be
the future standard for recording and playing in due time. Because of its newness,
there are more people who have yet to hear the digital sound. Because of the
visibility and exposure that will come from this projectthis could be the first time
ever people hear digital by way of theatre and video! As to how many people? 1-10
- 50 - 100 million? Well, what win be their first reaction? I NEED TO BUY A
DISC PLAYER! Their second reaction will be I WANT TO HEAR THAT SOUND
IN MY NEXT TV SHOW, VIDEO, MOVIE, ETC., We would like Sony to commit
fifteen million fear three to four future products that will follow the same format as
the Mutant Mania Project so that Tony and Sony will position themselves as the
pioneer and leaders in the industry. This will not allow composition to gain assets to
the marketplace until we are all firmly situated and profitable. We will also
assist in any way possible in the distribution of the theatrical and video
distribution. THE DEAL In a 60 second spot in the beginning of the
video, we will do commentary on Sony and its contributions to the Digital Industry
and the difference between conventional and digital recording. I) The
spot will be a commentary with music from French Lick in the background. The
commentary will discuss the Sony/PSDMS SOUND SYSTEM and the process by
which the PURE SOUND Is developed. To send home our point the "Difference Test"
will be used. The movie Mutant Mania will be promoted as the FIRST Feature Film to
use this system. II) Through a merchandizing campaign using the
video, (similar to Top Gun"), We will market a full line of Sony will offer a low budget
but profitable disc player to all purchasers of the video. The offer will be at
wholesale prices. The reason for the low budget product is that we hope when
people actually get to the store they will upgrade and buy at full retail!
 For Sony it will automatically insinuate that Sony is responsible for Tonys
technical accomplishments from the view of the audience which Tory will not
be concerned with. It will also promote all of Sony's entertainment
products. We will also develop a "60" second spot to be used on television
to promote the (entire project for both Sony and Tony Bongiovi). III) We
will also include Sony Equipment in the PSDMS System that will be needed to
convert the Theaters to the New Sound System. We will convert the Theatres Free if
the Theatre commits to showing the next THREE BONGIOVI PRODUCTIONS. This will
give us a guaranteed continued exposure and will give us guaranteed distribution
for both Sony Software and Bongiovi/Productions. We will recover the true costs of
equipment from distribution profits from the films. IV. We will produce a
60 second stand alone commercial for television, cable and theatre that will be used
to promote the project before the release of Mutant Mania. </div> Eg: A 6O
second spot utilizing the following elements: a. French Lick b.
Rawer Station recording facility c. Sony's contributions to the
manufacturer of the equipment to produce the sound. This may show "'the
difference". A spot showing French Lick
recording in Bower Station for the Mutant Mania movie. We would like to introduce to you the Sony/PSDMS give input on
what it is. "New sit back and let us know if you hear the difference." What would you rather listed to when listening to
feature films; video, cable or television. MERCHANDISING DEAL Sony will
private label a "Stony Bongiovi" or Power Station line of equipment: a).
Television b), Stereo Component c). Disc Player d). Video
Player The above package will include a
free video of Mutant Mania of which Sony will rebate full price back to
distribution. Tony and Stan will receive credits
for complete line: Total will be negotiated after we
have an idea of Sony margins. We want to make money only if Sony makes money!
Verdana;">We will also provide a marketing
package for all retail outlets that is now being developed. POWER STATION DIGITAL
MUSIC SYSTEM (PSDMS) <div style="text-align: justify; font-family:
Verdana;">Tony will include in Copyright Agreement that SONY EQUIPMENT must be
used to be PSDMS. SONY will receive "Credits on all video, theatrical, television,
and cable "PSDMS/SONY System" Tony and Stan will also receive credits
en all systems using Sony equipment sold to other film studios Also to be
negotiated after margins are figured. We will arrange a deal where, we along with
Sony, will cover exists to install the necessary equipment in all studios. We will
provide a one-day seminar to all thirty operators of the largest theatre
chains. </div> FINANCIAL
STRUCTURE <div style="text-align:
justify; font-family: Verdana;">I. Sony will only pay for expenses to produce 60-
second spots. SONY and Power Station will utilize any and all services to help
produce the spot and will allow reimbursement for only true costs with no mark-up
excluding all of Tonys time, which will be free. II. Power Station and
Power Productions I will receive a negotiated percentage of profits from all profits
generated from the merchandizing campaign of the Sony products and the sale that
may result to other film studios utilizing Sony equipment in the DNS
System. III. We will receive three sets of a full entertainment system -
Television, VCR, Stereo, Etc, that is top of the line to help during the production of
the film to be utilized by Marcia, Stan and Scott. IV. Sony will have first
right and first refusal of all and any distribution contracts for theatrical, video, cable,
and television syndications. We will promise not to even talk to anyone else until we
feel that Sony is not going to offer a fair and reasonable deal. We will give Sony a
5% margin to gain a competitive edge. </div> <div style="text-align: justify; font-family: Verdana;">The purpose of the
above and all aspects of this Deal is to let the separate entities involved maximize
their profits for their respective talents; Tory in film and music production and Sony
in manufacturing and eventually distribution of both equipment and merchandise
and later video and film distribution. World wide marketing available after
this picture through cinaworld and Marcia. Sony will be on credits of the film world
wide PSDMS? Power Station Digital to be shared with PSDMS? </div> <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px; font-family:
Verdana;"><div style="text-align: center;">SONY JOINT VENTURE PROPOSAL FOR THE DIGITAL
MOVIE </div><div style="text-align: center; font-family: Verdana;">
(May of 1987 by Stan J. Caterbone/Global Entertainment Group) (PSDMS -
Power Station Digital Movie System by Stan J. Caterbone) </div> I.
INTRODUCTION II. SONY'S ROLE III. MARKETING AND
DISTRIBUTION IV. PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT V. APPENDIX I. INTRODUCTION <div
style="text-align: justify; font-family: Verdana;">Tony Bongiovi and Power Station
Studio are undertaking a project that has the potential of revolutionizing the
entertainment industry. In the next few pages of this proposal, I will outline the
elements involved and how Sony can participate in this landmark event. 
 The technology of the recording industry has been advancing by leaps and
bounds. We have seen the advances from monaural long playing record to stereo
record to compact disc. Now we are seeing tape systems that use digital rather than
analog signals appear, matching the quality of compact discs. What has happened
to the theatres? The audio portion of a film, is as responsible for the sensations one
experiences at a motion picture as the visual, yet many theatre's are still equipped
only for mono sound. Why is this? We feel there are two basic reasons. 
 1) The relative high cost of upgrading a theatre to be able to incorporate
the advanced technologies of the audio industry. 2) The lack of
proper equipment for the film industry to produce high quality digital audio tracks.
 <div style="text-align: justify;">These two problems should not be
addressed separately. There is little motivation for upgrading until the product is
available and even less motivation to produce a product that cannot be heard.
 </div></div><div style="text-align: justify; font-family: Verdana;"> Tony
Bongiovi and Ed Evans at Power Station in New York, have now made it possible to
address these problems simultaneously. Their creation of the new "Power Station
Digital Movie Sound" (PSDMS), will not only enable the film industry to produce the
highest quality audio tracks for film, but will also allow theatre's to upgrade their
existing sound system at a minimal cost. To introduce this revolutionary
new sound, Bongiovi is in the process of producing a film entitled "Mutant Mania",
which is a science fiction action horror film, shot in a small ocean resort town in New
Jersey. This film has many elements that make it perfect for the introduction of
PSDMS. The most prevalent of these being the heavy music score by Bongiovi's
latest band "French Lick". Producing bands is definitely one of Bongiovi's fortes.
Bongiovi was instrumental in creating "Bon Jovi" who is probably the strongest force
in the rock and roll circuit today. "Bon Jovi's" third album "Slippery When Wet", has
sold more copies in a short period of time than any other band in history.
 Another is the fact that this is a horror film. The use of audio in horror
films is important to create tension, fear, excitement etc. Using a horror film also
lessens the influence the critics have on the audience. By and large this
film will stand on it's own merits. Now add PSDMS, and you have a potential block
buster event. How does Sony fit into all of this? </div> II.
SONY'S ROLE What we are seeking to do is establish a distribution route in
which the message of Sony's new technology and its benefits can be more easily
and directly passed on to the consumer. SONY/PSDMS <div
style="text-align: justify; font-family: Verdana;"> Picture a one or two minute
commentary at the beginning of the movie and home video, demonstrating the
difference between the quality of theatrical sound now and the new SONY/PSDMS
sound. This does two things. First, by demonstrating the difference in quality of the
new sound, you reinforce in the audiences mind that it is much better, which as you
will hear, there is little doubt. Secondly it reinforces in the audience that Sony truly
is a pioneer of advanced innovative technologies. In addition to the
commentary, Sony will receive credits on the film, ie. SONY/PSDMS. We will
include in the copyright agreement that Sony Equipment must be used to be
SONY/PSDMS. Sony's name will also be strategically placed
throughout the film. This may be done in the form of billboards, advertisements, or
Sony equipment being utilized. A commercial may be developed for TV
promoting both the film and Sony's contributions to advanced audio techniques in
the film industry. This could be done as a joint venture between Sony and the
distribution company for the theatrical and video exhibition. Inside
every video tape that is sold, a coupon may be placed to promote Sony products.
 A full line of quality equipment may be SONY/POWER STATION labeled
for consumer use to enhance marketability of Sony entertainment products. 
 Sony Video Software Corporation will receive right of first refusal on all
contracts for video and theatrical distribution. We will allow Sony a preferred 5%
margin under any other distributor for a competitive edge. TIMING Timing is crucial in a project that
touch so many different areas. III.
MARKETING AND DISTRIBUTION Most of the industry by their
own admission is at least two years away from an effort to upgrade the sound in
movie theatres. With the SONY/PSDMS system, other companies may adapt easily
and economically to produce products with digital movie sound. With companies
adapting to this process, the future should see the prominence of the SONY/PSDMS
insignia much the same as you see the Dolby insignia today. This will act as a
constant reminder to the public that Sony truly is a pioneer of advanced audio
visual technologies. Sony will receive exposure in the professional
market place by having the SONY/POWER STATION equipment used in theatres and
studios to produce the SONY/PSDMS sound. The video industry is a
56 billion dollar industry that is in need of product. When you look at the potential
for a product that will be one of the first feature films to compliment the fast paced
VCR/Stereo Entertainment components, with a musical score that may have enough
merits of its own, you have an amazing potential for distribution. The
Digital and Disc Industry has proven to be the future standard for recording and
playing. Because of the relative newness of the digital format, there are more
people who have yet to experience the digital sound. With the high exposure that
will come from this project, this could be the first time ever people hear digital.
How many people? 1 - 10 - 50 - 100 million? What will be their first
reaction? I need to buy a Disc Player! Who's name will they think of
first? SONY/PSDMS IV. PRODUCT
DEVELOPMENT Bongiovi and Evans at Power Station have developed
a revolutionary hybrid mixing console to penetrate the video post production
market. This console was developed to enable engineers to produce high quality
audio tracks for the film industry as well as the recording industry. This new console
utilizes an automation system that can be used by both industries. This new
console is especially attractive to the film industry, as it will greatly reduce
production costs since mixing costs in a recording studio are much less. At present
the console that is being used is a bastardized system that utilizes components
from many different pieces of equipment, from a number of different companies, of
which Sony is one. Because we already have a working model of this console, it
would take very little time for a finished product to be manufactured that could
carry the SONY name. The other piece of equipment that is essential
to the PSDMS process, is the box that enables the laser disc to automatically read
the synchronization track encoded on the film. This piece of equipment can be
produced at an extremely low cost. It is this low cost and the fact that the theatres
will not have to replace their present projectors that make digital movie sound a
reality in 1988. We feel that with consumers demanding the same
quality audio at theatres, as they have become accustomed to with their home
entertainment systems, theatre owners will have little problem investing the
nominal amount of dollars involved, to upgrade their theatres for digital audio. This
investment could be as low as $1000. With the cost being so low, the
distribution company may want to consider bearing the burden of this cost, if the
theatre owners agree to show Bongiovi's next three films. FINANCIAL STRUCTURE
 SONY will commit four million dollars for the production of Bongiovi's
film to be released in 1988. We would like SONY to commit fifteen million for three
to four future products that will follow the same format as the first, so that Bongiovi
and SONY will position themselves as the pioneer and leaders in the industry. This
will not allow competition to gain access to the marketplace until we are all firmly
situated and profitable. Sony will only pay for expenses to
produce 60 second spots. Tony and Power Station will utilize any and all services to
help produce the spot and will allow reimbursement for only true costs with no mark
up including all of Tony's time which will be Power Station and Power Productions I
(Stan Caterbone - Power Productions I) will receive a negotiated percentage from all
revenues generated from the merchandizing campaign of the SONY/POWER
STATION products and the sale that may result to other film studios utilizing
Sony/POWER STATION equipment in the PSDMS System. We will
receive four deluxe entertainment systems - Television, VCR, Stereo, Etc. that is top
of the line to help during the production of the film. The purpose of the
above and all aspects of this Proposal is to let the separate entities involved
maximize their profits for their respective talents; Bongiovi in film and music
production and Sony in manufacturing and distribution of equipment and
merchandise and later video and film distribution. END </div> <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px; font-family: Verdana;"> POWER STATION <div style="text-align: justify; font-family: Verdana;">Power Station was
formed in 1977, in partnership with Tony Bongiovi and Bob Walters. Power Station,
within a short period of time established itself as the premiere recording facility in
the world. The studios success to a large degree is due to Bongiovi's tremendous
creative talents in the fields of studio design, production and entertainment. The
ability to anticipate what the public at large wants to hear and to create a format
that will produce a highly marketable product. Bongiovi's creative genius
became most evident with his recent success producing the band "Bon Jovi". After
years of work developing their talent and structuring the format for their music,
"Bon Jovi" rapidly became one of top bands in the world. Bongiovi's most recent
project is a band called "French Lick", which he brought into the studio
approximately two years ago. You may have heard French Lick's music in Ron
Howard's production of Gung-Ho. French Lick's music and talent have been
developed along the same format as "Bon Jovi" and have recently been showcased
to the major recording labels. Contracts should be finalized with Quantum Medium
in a few weeks. Quantum Medium is a division of MCA, owned by the same people
that own MTV. French Lick is wholly owned by Power Station, along with their first
album, which gives Bongiovi the ability to use any and all the songs from the album
in the movie. By placing the band in the movie and having the music
score written by the band, we are able to take advantage of marketing potential
normally not available to other productions. The music video for the band will be
shot at the "same time as the movie and will primarily be scenes from the movie.
The release of the video will be timed to promote the opening of the movie. The
release of the songs off the first album will also be -coordinated to promote the
movie. To fully understand the marketing potential the band brings to the project,
picture what, gross receipts at the box office would look like if "Bon Jovi" were
appearing in a movie this year (Any movie). If French Lick does one tenth as well as
Bon Jovi, this movie is a guaranteed hit. During Bongiovi's work on "Star
Wars", "Apocalypse Now" and "Gung-ho", he was able to make many of the contacts
necessary to form the extremely talented group of artists that are essential for a
production to be successful. Barbara Peters:
Director/Writer/Producer Barbara has directed many programs such as
"Matt Houston", "Falcon Crest", "Cagney and Laoey", "Misfits", "Berrengers", and
"Remington Steele" to name a few. The film Barbara directed that convinced Tony to
hire her for this production was "Humanoids From The Deep". Humanoids was made
in 1978 for $ 980,000 ($ 20,000 under budget and four days ahead of schedule) and
grossed over $28 million in domestic and foreign theatrical Sales. This was during a
period in time when the video market was in its early stages of development. A film
released today that would gross $ 28 million in 1978 dollars has even greater
potential for a much higher gross with the strong video market that is available now.
What impressed Tony the most with Barbara's direction of Humanoids was her
ability to bring a high degree of quality to a film on such a limited budget. Peter Hock: Stunt
Ooordiiator/Actor/Stuntman Peter's credits include films such as,
"Trading Places", "Stepford Wives", "To Kill A Cop", "Ghost Busters", "FX", and a host
of other Films, Broadway, Musicals and Television Shows. There are many
factors, which contribute to a projects success. If you were to take a cross section of
the movie industry to find which types of projects were most likely to succeed, you
would find that movies in the two to four million dollar range have much greater
chances of success than movies in the ten to fifteen million dollar range. The
reasons for this are quite simple. A movie in the two to four million-dollar ranges is a
high enough budget to produce a quality film but limiting the risk to the investor
since it needs less of the market share to produce a profit. Horror movies,
from the investors point of view are the safest type of movie to finance. Horror
movies have an almost cultist following. The type of audience that attend horror
movies rarely wait to see what the critics have to say about the movie. There is a
fascination with gore that this audience would rather see than have described to
them. The overseas market for movies of this genre is tremendous. In almost all
cases the gross revenues from the theatre, will be greater overseas than in the
domestic (US and Canada) market. This especially holds true for horror
movies. Over the last few years, we have been seeing a trend for movies
to have a much heavier music score than in the past. The feelings that can be
invoked in an audience from audio are sometimes as great or greater than the
visual aspects of a film. With Bongiovi's experience and past track record, we are
assured of having one of the best quality sound tracks to a movie ever made. This
production could very well revolutionize the movie industry in that this will be the
first time that the sound track will be totally digitized from the set to the theatre or
home video. What this means is that the quality of the sound, which is typically
extremely poor in a movie theatre or home video cassette, will now be
tremendously crisp. This new movie sound will be similar to the quality you would
expect from a laser disc. Normally the costs involved to produce a movie with this
type of sound track would greatly increase the budget to a point where the project
would nave an increased element of risk. With Power Station, which already has in
place state of the art equipment, some of which can be found in only one or two
other studios in the world, this sound track can be produced for a fraction of the
costs that another production company would have to pay. This greatly reduces the
risk to the investor to be able to produce state of the art audio at a fraction of the
costs. It is a very natural progression for a recording studio such as Power
Station to evolve into an entertainment complex, which includes the production of
films. Power Station currently has financing in place for a $ 3.5 million video mix
studio to be built next to the recording studio. Distribution companies are constantly
looking for new sources of product to market. With Bongiovi's track record in the
entertainment industry, any product that carries the Bongiovi label should create a
bidding situation with the distributors. Advanced public relations work is
currently being done to set the stage for negotiations with the distribution
companies. "Billboard11, "Variety", and "Box Office" have already agreed to do
articles on Bongiovi and the movie. On April 30, ABC will be airing a radio talk show
with Bongiovi that will air on 2300 stations to a total listening audience of over six
million people. "Pame, Fortune, and Romance" have also agreed to give network TV
coverage. The home video market has rapidly been changing the
potential movie profits for the industry. A Nightmare On Elm Street was made for
well under two million dollars and has earned New Line Cinema more than $24
million at the domestic box office. In addition, after a short video release, this
production has sold over 3 million cassettes. In the past videos were sold only to
video rental stores for approximately $70 apiece. Recently the price has been
lowered to expand the market to the general public. The video rental stores won't
disappear, but they may become more like record stores that also rent their albums.
All of this translates into more profit potential for producer and investor. It
is an extremely rare opportunity to be able to get in on the ground floor in an
offshoot of an already well established entertainment company. Any investor willing
to back this project will have first right of refusal on any future projects. The
percentages will remain the same for at least the first two projects. </div> <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px; font-family:
Verdana;"><div style="text-align: center;">INVESTING IN
MOTION PICTURES - Financing Forecast </div> Independently produced motion pictures are a better investment today
than ever before. Reasons: 1) Increased Markets: There is
much wider distribution of motion pictures today than ever before (i.e. Pay
TV, Cable TV, videocassettes, satellite
 transmissions, etc. 2) Presale1
contracts which bind the buyers (i.e. networks, pay TV, foreign distributors, etc.) to
specific payments at a future date, this insuring
 return of capital and, in some cases, a
profit before the film is released. Investment Structure: <div
style="text-align: justify; font-family: Verdana;">The producer and investor form a
limited partnership for the purposes of producing one or more motion pictures. The
investor receives 100% of the net profits until recoupment, after which the split is
50-50. Profit participation of others (actors, director, writer, etc.) comes out of the
producer's end. Packaging: The producer secures the
services of a director, principal actors, and a writer. Presale
Deals: The producer can negotiate presale (preproduction)
arrangements with distributors, networks, pay TV, merchandisers, etc. Whereas
such arrangements can minimize the downside risk, they can also inhibit the
eventual profitability of the film. Risk
Factors: It is very difficult to determine exactly how much of a risk one
runs in financing a theatrical film. Adequate statistics are impossible to find.
Sharmat Services of Los Angeles a four-year-old study which revealed that 60% of
all films released make money. This study, however, did not include long range TV
syndication (foreign and domestic) revenues, and was made before Pay TV and
video cassettes became significant additional markets, chemical Bank of New York
reports that they have never lost money on film financing. Another risk is
the possibility that no distributor will want to release the picture. That is why some
independent producers include, a provision for distribution financing in their
investment agreements. If worse comes to worst, producers can distribute the film
themselves. (Notable examples are "Billy Jack" and "Benji".) There may
be production catastrophes that will delay or cancel production once it is under way.
Producers will carry various forms of insurance (including completion bonds) to at
least repay whatever funds have already been spent. Marketing: If a distribution arrangement has not
already been made, the producer now secures such an arrangement. If the picture
is good, it is possible to negotiate a much better deal than could have been done
earlier. On the other hand, the producer could have trouble securing the kind of
distribution commitment wanted. The main factors here are how much money the
distributor is willing to commit to selling the picture, how much influence the
producer can have on the marketing campaign, and the distribution fee. Sometimes
small distributors are able to give more time and attention to independent pictures
and offer better terms, but the producer may have to provide some distribution
expenses. Out of gross domestic box office receipts, the exhibitor
(retailer) usually subtracts his fixed costs and then receives 10%. Out of the
remaining 90% gross film rentals received by the distributor (wholesaler), he usually
recoups all or part of his costs plus a distribution fee of 20-35%, then passes the
rest on to the producer/investor. Terms of distribution deals vary considerably.
 Box office receipts, however, only account for a part of the
producer/investor's revenues. As the enclosed figures show, the ancillary markets
are at least as significant as the domestic theatre box office. TV syndication, for
instance, can continue to bring in revenues for the next twenty
years. Demand for
Product: Today's supply comes nowhere near to matching real
demand. At the present time, there are over 18,000 theatres in the United States, it
can readily be seen that roughly 400 films produced and rated last year did not
begin to meet; their needs. Theatres are compelled to show any type of film they
can obtain to keep their doors open. To date, independent producers are
responsible for 72% of all films made world-wide. The domestic figure is 62%. The
independent producer has three primary options regarding distribution. These
include the sale of the film outright to a major national distributor, their
merchandising of the film by the production company itself, or the use of smaller
regional sub-distributors who may promote the film in their respective geographical
areas. Distribution of films often relies on all' three methods to one degree or
another. Another market, television, can consume nearly every film that
has been, or is presently being produced. If each of the three networks would show
only one film per night, they would need over 1,000 films per year. In Los Angeles
area alone, there are nearly 10,000 films aired each year in a combination of local
and network viewing time. Many films are shown time and time again because there
are no new films to replace them. Today, virtually every film of quality has
residual value in television, either by outright sale or by term licensing. The latter is
preferable since it allows the production company to retain ownership of the
negative. The time lag between theatre release and TV sale has diminished from
seven years to an average of 18 months. However, some major features such as
"The Wiz" have been sold to TV before completing a full year in theatrical release.
The trend seems to be toward purchase of 'fresh1 films, and the outlets appear
willing to pay the higher costs involved. Because of the great demand and
the outrageously competitive attitude that pervades the networks, handsome deals
are being consummated before the production has been completed and then, by
prearrangement ' with the producers, hold the film until it has completed its
theatrical run. <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"><div style="text-
align: center;">Forecast A </div></div>Breakeven for Limited Partners: Based on gross revenues of $
11,200,000 collected from 1st and 2nd theatrical runs 1st run ticket costs of $
6.00 2nd run ticket costs of $ 5.00 1st
Run 50 people per show x $ 6.00 $ 300.00 per show X 1000
houses $ 300,000 X 14 days 2nd Run 50 people per show X $
5.00 $ 250.00 per show X 2000 houses $ 500,000 X 14 days Total 1st Run
Total 2nd Run Total $ 300.00 Gross per show $
300,000 Gross $ 4,200,000 Gross $ 250.00 Gross per show $ 500,000 Gross $
7,000,000 Gross $ 4,200,000 $ 7,000,000 $11,200,000 Forecast A Total Box Office Gross $
11,200,000 Less 15% For Theatres ' ; $ 1.680.000 Motion Picture
Profits $ 9,520,000 Less 30% Distribution Fee $
2,856,000 $ 6,664,000 Less : Investors Capital $
family: Verdana;">Net Profit $ 2,664,000 Producers Split @ 50% $
1.332.000 Investment Company Return $
family: Verdana;">less : General Partners Split @ 15% $
Verdana;">Investors Return $ 1,132,200 These are only projections and are for informational purposes only. Any
investment made, based solely on these projections would be unadvisable as actual
performance could vary greatly. <div style="text-align: center; font-family:
Verdana;">Forecast
B </div> Forecast B is based on a total box office gross of $ 28 million A film that
produces a theatrical gross of $ 28 million can be expected to gross at least that
much from TV, Cable and video markets. Depending on how distribution agreements
are negotiated we can expect 50% to be net profits Forecast B Total Box Office Gross $
Verdana;">Less 15% For Theatres ' $ 4,200,000 Motion Picture Profits
$ 23,800,000 less 30% Distribution Fee $ 7,140,000 
$ 16.660,000 T.V., Cable and Video Net $ 14,000,000 Ttotal Net $
25.340,000 Less : Investors Capital $ 4,000,000 Net Profit$ 21.340.000 Producers Split
@ 50% $ 10,,670,000 Investment Companies' Return $
Verdana;">Lsss :..General Partners Split @ 15% $ 1,600,500 Investors
Return $ 9,069,500 These are only
projections and are for informational purposes only. An investment made, based
solely on these prxyiections would be unadvisable as actual performance could vary
greatly. <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px; font-family: Verdana;"><div
style="text-align: center; font-family: Verdana;">POWER PRODUCTIONS I LETTER OF INTENT </div><div style="text-align: center; font-
family: Verdana;">FOR JOINT
VENTURE PARTICIPATION CONTRIBUTION (May 20,
1987) </div> <div style="text-align: justify;
font-family: Verdana;">The undersigned, intending to be legally bound , in
consideration of his admission as a participant in the j o i n t venture to be known a
s "POWER PRODUCTIONS I" and receipt of a profit/loss distribution share of % of
___________ such joint venture, hereby declares and acknowledges his intent to
participate in such joint venture and hereby covenants and agrees to contribute the
sum of $_______________________ to the capital of such joint venture, which sum shall
constitute his initial capital account in such joint venture. This Letter of
Intent is entered into by the undersigned upon the following general
understanding: Power Productions I will be a joint venture to be formed
under the laws of Pennsylvania, having the specific purpose to invest (loan) its
funds to MUTANIA PRODUCTIONS, INC. t o finance such corporation's production of a
motion picture. The joint venture shall receive full repayment of its investment from
MUTANIA PRODUCTIONS, INC. before the distribution of any profits to any party.
Thereafter, the joint venture shall receive 50% of the profits from such motion
picture of which 85% shall be distributed to the non-managing joint ventures
(including the undersigned) and 15% shall be distributed to Stanley J. Caterbone as
the Managing Joint Venturer of Power Productions I. The joint venture shall have a
right of first refusal to finance the next movie production of MUTANIA
PRODUCTIONS, INC. and/or TONY BONGIOVI. The undersigned agrees that
he will execute and deliver a counter-counterpart of the joint venture agreement
(which shall be consistent with the above general understanding) and that he will
execute and deliver all documents required for the joint venture to elect not to be
taxed as s a partnership. Contemporaneous with the execution of this
letter of intent, the undersigned is contributing 10% of his total agreed contribution,
or $__________________, within fifteen (15) days from the date hereof, time being of
the essence, the undersigned shall contribute the 90% balance, or
$_____________________ . Such contribution shall be held by Stanley J. Caterbone at
interest pending completion of all negotiations and execution and delivery of all
documents with MUTANIA PRODUCTIONS INC.. If such negotiations,
delivery and execution are not completed within thirty (30) days after the full
contribution is made, the entire contribution, with all interest earned thereon, shall
be returned to the undersigned without demand. Stanley J. Caterbone shall be
responsible for collection, receipt, interim investment and management, and
ultimate investment or return of all funds contributed, and shall be the Managing
Joint Venturer of the joint venture. The undersigned hereby authorizes
and empowers Stanley J. Caterbone to negotiate, execute, and deliver all
documents necessary or required to implement the joint venture purpose and to
take all other actions and negotiate, execute and deliver all other documents
necessary or desirable to implement of effectuate the joint venture purpose.
 </div> SIGN NAME:_________________________(L.S.) Date: May
______,1987 PRINT NAME:_______________________________________________ STREET ADDRESS:____________________________________________ CITY:____________________ STATE:_________
ZIP:_________ <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px; font-family: Verdana;"><div
style="text-align: center; font-family: Verdana;">RICHARD C. FOX, PC ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1015 ROBERTS VALLEY ROAD HARRISBURG,
PENNSYLVANIA 17110 </div>RICHARD C. FOX* ADMITTED ALSO
FLORIDA May 20,
Verdana;">Mr. Stanley J, Caterbone,
President FMG Advisory, Inc. Eden Park II, 1755 Oregon Pike Lancaster, PA
Verdana;">For Professional Services rendered in connection with Power
Productions Including conference, preparation of Letter of Intent, and express
mailing, and follow-up telephone check. Professional Fee
Verdana;">U.P.S. 8 .95 $258.95 PAID RIA #117 <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;
font-family: Verdana;"><div style="text-align: center;">FLATBUSH </div><div style="text-align: center;
font-family: Verdana;"> FILMS,INC. May 23, 1987 </div>
 Mr. Stan
Caterbone Financial Management Group 1755 Oregon Pike Lancaster, Pa.
17601 Dear Stan: <div style="text-
align: justify; font-family: Verdana;">At your request Ive investigated the
requirements of the Completion Bond. Bert Schneiderman of Worldwide Completion
Services in New York has given me a figure of 5*5%, excluding contingencies, with a
50% No Claims Bonus, Since Bert also owns Bon Bon Payroll Service he has agreed
to waive the payroll fee if we xise their bonding service. Requirements:
They need copies of the budget and/or production board revenues for the director
and producers as well as copies of their contracts and any other production
agreements which have been completed. Further they need to know when
we will commence principal photography, editing location and if we intend to have a
distribution deal up front.I spoke to Jerry Vandersonde and Bill Hudson of DeWitt
Stern Insurance in Los Angeles, who were recommended by Worldwide. Since I
couldn't show him a budget or a script we did some educated guessing and came
up with a figure of approximately $75,000. The Production Package policy should
include: General liability, cast insurance* negative film, faulty stock and camera
processing, props, sets, wardrobe, rented equipment, extra expenses, third party
property damage, non-owned auto, Errors and Omissions including a one year bond
and a minimum workmen's comp policy for anything that is not covered by
workmen's comp. I understand you're going to Wildwood this weekend.
We need to house a crew of about 60-80, production offices, catering service, We'd
like to get as many free extras as possible and need high quality promo type
giveaways. For screen credit, of course. If you have any such contact we'll need
mutant dolls (500?) and if you can help bring down location costs that would be
great. I'm talking about beaches, amusements, the pier parking facilities. Probably
well handle that better next week when we can talk in person. </div> Sincerely, Arlene Davids
n
/span> <div
style="text-align: center; font-family: Verdana;">4334 STERN AVE., SHERMAN
OAKS, CALIFORNIA (818} 995-3417 </div> <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px; font-family: Verdana;"> <div style="text-align: center; font-family:
Verdana;">FLATBUSH FILMS,INC May 23,
1987 </div>Ms. Ellen Libman
Verdana;">Power Station, Inc. 441 West 53rd Street New York, N.Y. 10019 Dear Ellen: <div style="text-align: justify; font-
family: Verdana;">Barbara and I have mapped out a skeleton schedule for our trip
to New York and I thought I'd send it off and see if it works for everyone else. By the
way, we've decided to stay in New York until Tuesday instead of Monday as
originally planned. Arrive about 3:00PM. You have the exact time since
you've booked our flights. Please let us know if someone will pick us up or if we
should take a taxi, We'll come to Power Station and give you and Tony copies of the
script and budget, which we'd like you to read Thursday night, Barbara and I have a
dinner meeting with a Director of Photography. Leave for .New Jersey in
the morning. Discuss script and budget, Meet Mayor of Wildwood and bring him a
synopsis of script which he has requested. , Meet with Steve Garelick, the
Production Coordinator of the New Jersey Film Commission. Look at
locations. Stan Caterbone arrives in New Jersey. Meet the rep from
Maury's Pier to discuss location costs. Check out hotels for crew and cast. Last
minute details in New Jersey, Leave for New York around noon. Meetings at Power
Station for final discussions About script, budget, contracts, etc. Tuesday
Afternoon - Leave New York approximately 4PM to arrive Los Angeles
about 5 pm. </div> Cc: Stan Caterbone Barbara Peters 
1992 CCHR COMPLAINT
To Visit The Citizens Commission on Human

Rights Go To www.cchr.com CCHR Abuse Case Interview Form (ver. 1.0), Jan, 1,
Verdana;">No Proof or Edit Citizens Commission on
Human Rights 6362 Hollywood Boulevard, Suite B Los Angeles, CA 90028
Verdana;">Phone: (213) 467-4242 Fax: (213) 467-3720 ABUSE CASE INTERVIEW
FORM NAME: Stan J. Caterbone AGE:
Verdana;">ADDRESS: 615 Wyncroft Lane, Apt. 2 CITY: Lancaster STATE: PA
ZIP: 17603 WORK PHONE:(717) 392-3682 ' HOME PHONE: Same FAX: (717)
392-0532 DATE: January 1,
Verdana;">FORM FILLED OUT BY: Stan J. Caterbone <div style="text-align: justify;">Brief summary of abuse (Drugs, Electric Shock
Treatment, Psychiatric Rape, Confinement): Fabricated
allegations of suicide, "going to the beach with a gun to kill himself", made by
James Warner on August 12, 1987 to the Stone Harbor Police Department.
Incarcerated and taken to the Burdette Tomlin Hospital in Stone Harbor, New Jersey,
on August 12, 1987 by Officer Steve O'Conner and Henry Stanford of the Stone
Harbor Police Department, and accompanied by Steve and Tom Caterbone
(brothers). Hospital officials refused to release me, and after several hours, I was
forced into signing a contract with the hospital that said "I, Stanley J. Caterbone will
not take my life tonight or anytime" as a requirement for my release. [SEE PAGES 40
TO 41 OF ROY GRIFFEN'S CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS, DATED DECEMBER 20,
1991] </div> <div style="text-align:
justify;">On September 9th,
1987, I was denied bail for again fabricated criminal charges of September 3, 1987,
(all charges dropped in March of 1988) unless I admitted myself into the Psychiatric
Unit of St. Joseph Hospital in Lancaster, PA. Officials of the Lancaster County Prison,
attorney Robert Byers, Mary Lynn DiPaolo, Dr. Al Shulz, Yolanda Caterbone (Mother),
and Michael Caterbone (brother) all collaborated that the only way bail would be
allowed to be posted is by admitting myself, voluntarily, into the Hospital. After
learning that the requirment (hospitalization), for posting bail was not required, I
released myself from the hospital. During the five days of hospitalization, I was
made to take lithium several times per day. I was also denied any opportunity to
communicate with any attorneys or representatives regarding any of my legal
affairs. [SEE PAGES 45 TO 46 OF ROY GRIFFEN'S CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS, DATED
DECEMBER 20, 1991] On June 7, 1991, I was again incarcerated and arrested on fabricated
charges, again by the Stone Harbor Police, again by Officer Henry Stanford, for
driving while under the influence. During a sobriety test on the sidewalk, I again
asked Officer Stanford what the charges were and he replied "It doesn't matter, it is
my word against yours, -and we know who they will believe, remember '87. When I
passed two breathalizer tests (.08), Officer Stanford refused to release me and I was
placed in a holding cell. After several hours, an Officer McLaughlin arrived from the
Avalon Police Department, with a warrent for my arrest, for outstanding warrents
(fabricated traffic violations of August 14, 1987), which attorney Byers had since
said were dropped, and again placed under arrest. The two officers, McClaughlin
(Avalon, NJ) and Stanford (Stone Harbor, NJ) requested $340.00 for bail. I requested
to go to my car for the cash, which was one block away, and Officer McGlaughlin
refused stating "you may have a gun in the car". I was taken to the Cape May
County Prison, fingerprinted and improsoned until the next day. I posted bail the
following day. [SEE PAGES 74 TO 75 OF ROY GRIFFEN'S CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS,
DATED DECEMBER 20, 1991] On September 3, 1987, I was arrested for burglarizing my own leased
property, charged with stealing my own property, charged with destroying my own
property, charged with terrorizing my own employee, who I kissed goodbye, and
awaited for her safe return into my building, and charged with making an alleged
bomb threat to my own place of business, by the Manhiem Township Police
Department, the Lancaster District Attorney, District Justice Murray Horton, and
District Justice Richard Reeser. [SEE PAGES 44 TO 45 OF ROY GRIFFEN'S
CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS, DATED DECEMBER 20, 1991] On December 4, 1987 at the annual shareholders meeting of Financial
Management Group, Ltd., the company that I had founded, Mr. Robert Kauffman
conveniently arranged and hired armed security guards stand _at the entrance of
the meeting. This strategy was used for the sole purpose of purporting and
supporting his fabricated allegations of criminal misconduct and mental illness of
myself, by suggesting that I was going to attend the meeting, which was perfectly
within my rights, as a 20% shareholder of Financial Management Group, Ltd., the
Executive Vice President, and Secretary, and President of FMG Advisory. Mr.
Kauffman attempted to insinuate that I was contemplating attending the meeting in
order to cause violence. I did not attend the meeting, nor had any plans to do so.
[SEE PAGES 53 OF ROY GRIFFEN'S CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS, DATED DECEMBER 20,
1991] In March of 1991, David D. Dering,
the president of American Helix Technology Corporation, told all employees during a
special staff meeting, that I "was a runaway ex-convict that would end up in jail
soon, and that I was "bad news". Mr. Dering also spent approximately 20 minutes
slandering my character, my reputation, and my business activities. Mr. Dering was
threatened by my disclosure of filing a civil Anti-Trust suit against American Helix
and High Industries, its parent company, for allegations of conspiracy to sabotage
my business activities in 1987 with "Digital Technologies", which resulted in the
formation of American Helix, by persons which were involved in my business affairs
in 1987, and which was my business. (Scott Robertson, Robert Long, Norris Boyd,
High Industries). [SEE PAGES 73 OF ROY GRIFFEN'S CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS,
DATED DECEMBER 20, 1991] On July 6, 1987 in the first conversation with Dr. Al Shulz since
'November of 1986, Stan Caterbone learned that numerous persons, including Mary
Lynn DiPaolo and Jere Sullivan had personally called Dr. Shulz and fabricated
allegations of mental illness in the previous' days. Dr. Al Shulz also accused Stan
Caterbone of suffering from "illusions of grandure", and did not believe any of his
extensive business dealings, specifically the "Digital" movie and its related
activities. [SEE PAGES 34 TO PAGES 35 OF ROY GRIFFEN'S CHRONOLOGY OF
EVENTS, DATED DECEMBER 20, 1991] On or about July 30, 1987 Stan Caterbone retained the services of Dr.
Marshall Levine, a psychiatrist from Northfield, NJ, to conduct an objective review of
his mental state of mind, soley to discredit the fabricated allegations of mental
illness. Dr. Levine conducted a 2 hour interview at his home in Stone Harbor, NJ and
requird Stan Caterbone to complete the MMPI test. Stan Caterbone also paid Dr.
Marshall Levine a $600 fee for the services. After submitting the MMPI test, and not
hearing from Dr. Levine, Stan Caterbone finally called Dr. Levine for the results. Dr.
Levine had disclosed that he had conducted telephone interviews with family
members, without the consent or knowledge of Stan Caterbone, and specifically not
adhering to the original agreement of a complete objective and impartial review.
Dr. Levine prescribed Lithium drugs, and would not send any written
communications regarding his findings or conclusions. Stan Caterbone requested
for a refund of all monies paid, however Dr. Marshall Levine refused. [SEE PAGES
39 TO PAGES 40 OF ROY GRIFFEN'S CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS, DATED DECEMBER
20, 1991] It should be noted that I have never
been convicted of any crime, before or after the above occurences. In fact, I have
never had any altercation with the law before the above incidents, except for a few
speeding violations that dated back to 1982. </div> Many other incidents described in detail in Roy
Griffen's chronology of events of December 20, 1991. When did the abuse occur? See above. List the names of
the psychiatrists involved: Name Office/Hospital Phone Dr. Al Schulz
St. Joseph Hospital (717) 291-8083 Dr. Marshall Levine Northfield,
NJ forthcoming List the names of any other people involved: Name, Phone (All parties
below have supported and or fabricated allegations of insanity, and or psychiatric
treatment) Michael Hartlett, (717) 898-560-4499 Mary Lynn DiPaolo, (717) 569-0022
Verdana;">Michael DiPaolo, (717) 569-0022 Jere Sullivan, (703) 579-6143
Verdana;">James Warner, (717) 397-9968 Detective Sigler, (717) 569-6401
Verdana;">Robert Kauffman, (717) 569-560-8300 Detective Mathias, (717) 569-
Verdana;">Howard Eisler, (717) forthcoming David Drubner, (203) 753-
Verdana;">Yolanda Caterbone, (717) 394-7710 Steven Caterbone, (305) 751-
Verdana;">Phillip Caterbone(717) forthcoming Thomas Caterbone, (717) 299-
Verdana;">Robert Beyers, (717) 394-7204 David D. Dering, (717) 392-
Verdana;">Allon Lefever, (717) 293-4444 Scott Robertson, (717) 393-
Verdana;">Mr. & Mrs. Frank Roda, (717) 394-1160 Linda Murphy Berger,
forthcoming Karen Hickman, (717) forhtcoming Michelle Hodge Miller, (213) 546-
Verdana;">Ronald Roda, (717) 299-5469 Wayne Landis, (717) 843-
Verdana;">Art Kerst (717) 392-4797 Evelyn Sullivan, (717) 392-
Verdana;">Benjamin Roda, (717) 392-9999 Joseph Roda (717) 397-
Verdana;">Amy Hinterlighter, (215) 640-4852 Dan Moyer (717) 295-
Verdana;">Jack Mahn (609) 368-1551 Bob Walters forthcoming
Verdana;">Victor Makarowicz (717) 569-8296 Herb Fisher (717) 394-
Verdana;">Fred Martin (FBI) (717) 232-8686 Jeff Jamounou (717) 232-
Verdana;">Sen. Gib Armstrong forthcoming Steven Hobday (717) 393-
Verdana;">Cristine Housner (717) 293-9293 District Justice Murray Horton
Verdana;">District Justice Richard Reeser forthcoming James Christian
Verdana;">Lt. Madenspacher (717) 569-6401 Richard Hobday (717) 393-
Verdana;">Tim Hogentogler (717) 569-8057 John Baumgardner
Verdana;">Daniel Berger (717) 872-1313 Alan Loss (717) 560-
Verdana;">Nancy Arment (717) 872-9355 Omar Landis (717) 859-
Verdana;">Peter Peneros (717)295-1200 John M. Wolf II 393-
Verdana;">Chuck Smith (717) 569-5341 Peter Wolfson (717) 299-6615,
(717) 569-5341 Craig Russell (717) 293-9293 Rich Braverman (717) 295-
Verdana;">Dr. William Umiker (717) 394-9936 William Kogler (404) 951-
Verdana;">Claude Pea (404) 951-0600 Thomas Flannery
Verdana;">Jay Curtis forthcoming Mike Kawahara forthcoming Benjamin Phister
forthcoming Mike Hess (717) 299-7382 Bruce Kline forhtcoming
Verdana;">John DePatto forhtcoming Michael McDonald forthcoming
Verdana;">Lewis Schweller (609) 645-1111 Michael Orstein
Verdana;">Mr. Tottaro, Asst. District Attorney (Lancaster) forthcoming Marc Finegold
(717) 392-7840 Pete Richter (717) 394-0547 Farmers First Bank (717) 394-0547
 Jill
Carson (Fulton Bank) forthcoming Norris Boyd (717) 569-0484 Cliff Weaver forthcoming
Verdana;">Ric Fox (717) 774-5244 Detective Bodan, PA Attorney Generals Office
forthcoming Give the sequence of the abuse in
detail from the beginning to end, providing the dates for all occurrences and the
names of the people involved in each occurrence. See Roy Griffen's Chronology of
December 20, 1991, pages 1 to 88. Date
Occurrence See Roy Griffen's Chronology of December 20, 1991, pages 1 to
Verdana;"><div style="text-align: justify;">List out the specific harms resulting from the
psychiatric treatment which you are aware of: Loss of
professional and personal ruputation. Loss of income. Extreme sense of cuation
when engaging in interpersonal relationships. Extreme loss of respect among
personal and professional peers. Complete and thourough mistrust for psychiatric
profession. Sense for the inadequate and abuse of psychiatric diagnosis, and
familiarity and personal experience of psychiatric abuse in order to support political,
financial, and or personal agendas and gains. Extreme loss of dignity. Extreme loss
of respect. Permanent psychological scares from experience. Extreme mental
duress, stress, and other related anxieties. Complete loss of faith of Psychiatric
profession and related supporting systems, including law enforcement, judicial, and
legislative, considering the pleas for help to resolve the criminal conspiracy in the
early stages of July, 1987. Loss of Patent and intellectual property rights of Financial Management
Group, Ltd., and Digital technologies, including the PSDMS (Power Station Digital
Movie Sound). Loss of Accumulated Business
assets worth at least $2,500,000. Do you have government connections personally or through
family members? If so, what? -Federal contracts
with the National Institute of Standards and Technology for CD-ROM manufacturing.
Procurement for same with the Defense Mapping Agency of the Department of
Defense. Phillip Caterbone (brother), fellowship with the National Institute of Health
of Bethesda, Maryland (1990-1991). Samuel A. Caterbone (brother), military
service, USAF (1969-1971). Samuel Caterbone, Jr., (father), alleged association with
the Central Intelligence Agency, CIA, (disclosed by Dominic Roda, uncle &
Godfather, on November 17, 1991, and by Midge Caterbone, aunt, on November 22,
1991. Both persons acknowledged the time period of 1974 to 1981 where the
whereabouts of Sameul Caterbone Jr. were unknown to all persons, including all
family members. Do you have family or friends who think you should undergo further
psychiatric treatment? See list. All persons have
advocated the use of medication. Reasons were never disclosed. The persons
would especially disclose the belief for psychiatric treatment when I persued legal
recourse for activities of 1987. In
all of the events, activities, and incidents described herein, No one, has ever stated
any particular event or incident to support the many allegations of mental illness.
Any allegations, the suicide, financial bankruptcy, and others, have always been
proven to be fabricated, and I have always had sufficient evidence that they were
fabricated. However, to this day, I, have never had any opportunity to discuss all
related affairs, contained herein, with the exception of the 4 hour meeting on
September 29, 1987, with the Pennsylvania Securities Commission. However, after
that meeting, I have not heard from the investigator, Mr. Howard Eisler, or any
representative of the Pennsylvania Securities Commission, until 2 months later,
when I recieved a notice to put my complaint into writing. In addition, during the preliminary hearing of the criminal charges of
September 3, 1987, my alleged attorney, Robert Byers, refused to discuss any of my
defenses, including that I was legally never terminated from the FMG, Ltd., Board of
directors, that I was an indiviual leaseholder of the building I allegedly burglarized,
that all of the files taken were my property, as well as others. How do you feel about what
psychiatry did to you? Ruined my life, my businesses, my
opportunity for income, and virtually all relationships encountered prior to 1987.
Loss of all personal assets, including homes, monies, and business
accomplishments. It is the single most reason for the lack of any type of quality of
life, which I presently am deprived, which will soon result in becoming
homeless. Have you
contemplated taking any action against the psychiatrist or do -you want to take
action? If so, what? Yes, civil suits to recover financial
damages, personal and professional reputation, and punative damages for extreme
emotional and mental duress. Any other comments or information you would like to provide?
style="font-family: Verdana;">This case is directly involved with a "Cover-Up"
(criminal conspiracy) to supress my knowledge and allegations of misconduct of
International Signal & Control (ISC), which I made public in May of 1987, and to
ISC executive Larry Resch on June 23, 1987, during a meeting at my office. I was a
shareholder of ISC stock during that time. In addition, Jere Sullivan and James
Warner, both of whom personally fabricated allegations of isanity, were directly
involved with ISC. Jere Sullivan worked for United Chem Con, (Guerin company),
and has been a business partner of Mr. Larry Resch since 1987. James Warner
(Lancaster Solid Waste Management Authority) was working with attorny Steve
Spinello, of the law firm of Hartman, Underhill, & Brubaker, on the $50 million
incinerator. Steven Spinello was also negotiating the ISC merger with Ferranti
International, of London, during the time inwhcih I made allegations of misconduct
regarding Mr. James Guerin, ISC, and United Chem Con. During this same time, Mr.
James Warner made repeated allegations of insanity, and also officially reported a
fabricated allegation of suicide to authorities of the Stone Harbor Police
Department, of New Jeresy. Ferranti and ISC finally merged the following November,
of 1987. In September of 1987, I made allegations of fruad within ISC to Howard
Eisler, an investigator with the Pennsyvania Securities Commission, during a 4 hour
meeting in my home, 'that was solicited by the Pennsylvania Securities
Commission. All allegations of insanity (surfacing in July of 1987 and continuing to
present), conveniently discredited all of my allegaitons of misconduct within ISC, its
executives, and its operations, as well as my allegations of criminal conspiracy and
fruad by Robert Kauffman, Michael Hartlett, FMG, Ltd., executives, Commonwealth
National Bank, as well as all other related parties. In 1989,
Ferranti disclosed allegaitons of the "Billion Dollar Fraud" by James Guerin and ISC,
by inflating the value of ISC related contracts. On October 31, 1991, ISC founder James Guerin, Larry Resch, and 17
others were indicted by a Philadelphia Federal Grand Jury on charges of a "$ 1.14
Billion Fraud (Ferranti/ISC Merger of November, 1987)" and the illegal sales of Arms
to South Africa and Iraq. Mr. Guerin and Mr. Resch have since pleaded guilty to all
charges. Thank you for
filling out this survey. Please send it to us in the enclosed self addressed
envelope. As per my
conversation with your representative on December 16, 1991, I would expect to
receive a copy of your findings, reports, and or conclusion of your investigation, for
myself, as well as my legal representatives, and or their agents. Audio
tapes of authentic recorded conversations of above incidents, forthcoming. In
addition, I possess the following information assets, which, beyond a shadow of a
doubt, collaborate, support, and prove all of the preceding: </div> Paper Documents Audio
Transcripts Microfiche VHS Video CD-ROM CD Audio 9-Track
Tape CD-ROM/CDTV Demo Discs Full Color Photographs News
Articles 11,000 Appr. 18 Hours 9,079 Images 50 Hours 150 Megabytes (1
disc) 60 Minutes (1 disc) 2 Reels- Appr. 5 0 400 Appr. 200
 
HAD LANCASTER LOST ITS SOVERIGNTY

Verdana">HAD LANCASTER COUNTY LOST ITS SOVEREIGNTY BEFORE IT LOST
ITS SOUL? Authored in May of
1998 Advanced Media Group </DIV> 
<DIV style="COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); TEXT-ALIGN: center">Each time a man stands up for an
ideal, or acts to improve the lot of
others, or strikes out against injustice, he
sends forth a tiny ripple of hope. And crossing
each other from a million different centers of energy and daring, those ripples build a
current which can sweep down the
mightiest walls of oppression.. by
Robert F. Kennedy </DIV> In 1987 This Plaintiff Had Unjustly Lost His
Freedoms, His Rights, And His Pursuit Of Life, Liberty And
Justice. <BR style="FONT-
following report (most identities purposely omitted from this version) is an
amazingly true and factual account of an extraordinarily bizarre tragedy that has
turned one mans life into an eleven (11) (Now 20) year free fall into Dantes Hell.
Verdana">On the surface,
this is a story of a victim struggling to seek the truth, but in reality, the evidence will
conclude that this is a victim, literally, held hostage by virtue of his truth. Later, the
preponderance of evidence that the victim has amassed and his obsession for
meticulously documenting his ordeal might seem eccentric, yet his demonstrated
ability to react to events before they unfold appears mystical. And this was his
manner in which he tactfully defended and protected his life. It is these actions that
have painted the landscape with a dire vengeance for his ruin. His actions will
ultimately serve to protect, preserve, and foster the truth of his story, incriminating
the culpability of his many perpetrators, while at the same time being twisted and
tainted in a relentless manner to attack his credibility. This is a story of a human being
endearing for his rights, living in fear of his life, and the remedial actions required
for the truth to set him free. A victim forever believing in his accomplishments and
his visions, yet forced to adhere to a life of their diversions. Fatefully, ten years after
being taken as a political hostage, with the aid of numerous arrests and false
imprisonments conveniently falling short convictions , a Federal Judge, Judge Stuart
Dalzall, of the Eastern District Court of Pennsylvania, opened a Pandoras Box into
the true colors of the inner workings and politics of ultra conservative Lancaster
County, Pennsylvania. A supposedly Gods country. His findings reeled a dramatic
and emotional response from the Lancaster County community that was akin to the
assassination of JFK . A community where obstructions of justice strikes a startling
and stark contrast to the image it so desperately embraces. A community proud of
its tough on crime judges, a community of plain folks and
Amish,
and a community settled in a beautiful landscape abundant in an agricultural
bounty. This is not a community of compromising integrity. Or so it has been
perceived. Judge Dalzalls extremely controversial findings were responsible for
Pennsylvanias own crafting of the Laurie Bill, the retaliation by the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania intended to curb the Federal Courts interference
within the respective states own jurisdictions and proceedings. Or was it a political
maneuver to close the lid on Pandoras Box? The Pennsylvania Attorney General
and the Lancaster County District Attorney have both thrown all their might and all
their muscle at turning the tides of Judge Dalzalls findings. This story and this
victims rights have been violated and abused by some of the very same principals
that were responsible for Judge Dalzalls unsettling revelations. Lancaster County
prosecutors were found to have engaged in one of the grossest acts of prosecutorial
misconduct found in the English speaking language, which allegedly occurred in
this now famous Lisa Michelle Lambert case, a murder trial which began in the
summer of 1992. Subsequently, it is now in the midst of a treacherous appeal
process convened by Judge Dalzall. And if so by fate, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,
the home of the Freedom Fighters. It is this public disclosure, that casts a new light and sudden hope
for freedom into this victims unbelievable and horrid story, that begun just four
years prior to the murder of Laurie Show. It is the decisive similarities of how both
victims were subjected to a very calculated and politically motivated attempts to
frame and fabricate circumstances to obtain the results that justified the means
for illicit self-serving interests. This very same conduct, committed by public
servants, elected and enlisted to enforce the law, to which Judge Dalzell found so
appalling. Conduct, which violated the very same rights their respective offices are
commissioned to protect. Conduct which strikes the meaning of We The People
from our nations very own Constitution. Fortunately, this victims story is laced with a thread of faith, a
faith in God. And because of his faith, this victim will forever regard Lisa Michelle
Lambert and Laurie Show as his little Angels of Justice, a Godsend. An answer to
his many prayers, that for the first time in ten years provided a small glimmer of
hope, and a few moments of solitude that have materially justified his own tragic
experience. The realization that the truth is that much more believable because of
the trials and tribulations of Lisa Michelle Lambert. Unfortunately, this revelation
came at the unfortunate and untimely death of Laurie. However, it just may be
Gods intentions of a Higher Purpose. This story was perpetuated through a gross miscarriage of justice:
a tenure of malicious wrongdoing by both the law enforcement community of
Lancaster County and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, as well as community
leaders. A process that continues obstruct this victims rights for justice. Its
mannerisms reach into the inner soul of political and judicial corruption. All in the
name of greed, and all in the honor of continuing the status quo of the Good Ole
Boys club of Lancaster County. A process obsessed with keeping its disclosure
from escaping beyond the confines of Pandoras Box. Its a tenure of power that
evolved from the days of this countrys earliest settlers, but an evolution that has
somewhere strayed away from the intent of our constitution;
with total
disregard for the law, in total disrespect for the Constitution, and void of many of
our civil liberties. This atrocity, like the Lambert case, would have made our
founding forefathers revel in disgust and bellow in despair. In fact, their spirits and
energies probably are! AT ISSUE The central issue in this story, is a
cover up, a cover up of mass proportions, and of perplexing design, with national
consequences. The fact of the matter is that this cover up has had ramifications
throughout this world, specifically the Middle East The cover up would be
emphatically unbelievable without the wealth of evidence, especially the recorded
conversations with Pennsylvania officials. A cover up that permeates from what will
later emerge as the 4th largest financial fraud (Billion Dollars) in the history of the
United States coupled with the covert sales of arms to Iraq. And five years after this
cover up began, these same munitions were used against our own troops in the
Persian Gulf War. And of course, there are admitted ties to the Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the National Security Agency (NSA).. And this cover
up and story, which began in June of 1987, in Lancaster County, preceded criminal
indictments by the United States Attorney General, the Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI), the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), the Department of Justice
and Commerce, and more. A vast array of criminal activities conspired from the
ultra conservative Lancaster County, where God is supposedly supreme, and its
hard line approach to crime is said to be preeminent. In June of 1987, Lancaster
County was immersed in a dynamic twist of fate, with a host of
players
which may never be fully identified. The irony of this story is how Lancaster County manages the
disclosure of the very same criminal activities that this story proves that it
condoned, prior to the intervention of federal authorities. It most dramatically will
prove the nature of its integrity, or lack thereof. International Signal & Control,
(ISC) is the controversial player in this web of conspiracy. In 1987, the third largest
employer in Lancaster County, a non-discrete defense contractor. In all due respect
to our beloved country, this report is in no way challenging the policies or the
activities of the Department of Defense, or the vast agencies of the Intelligence
Community, especially the CIA or the NSA (National Security Advisory). with
regards to ISCs foreign dealings. Trying to protect the world of malicious and evil
empires is a process which never ends, and whos players are constantly changing.
And our respective intelligence agencies are continually challenged with the task of
trying to make a difference, in accordance with protecting our national security.
Unfortunately, given the nature of their discrete activities, and given the CIAs
history of avoiding congressional approval in certain situations, our current laws are
void of effectively dealing with the peripheral catastrophes of such activities that
inherently transpire. The CIA remains immune, while everyone outside suffers the
consequences. The fact that the CIA, or anyone of the other intelligence community,
may have been involved, does not grant a blanket of immunity over activities which
were not material to protecting our national security. If a company provides a
service to anyone in the intelligence community, our constitution, our laws, and its
respective commercial regulatory authorities, must still have the full sense of their
jurisdiction. The intelligence community may not have the right of intervention into
the commercial enterprise, or organization, circumventing the rights of its
employees, shareholders, creditors, and customers. No United States law or statute
suggests that there is any involuntary mandate that requires any of the preceding
to compromise their interests in the respective enterprise for the sake of national
security, or the respective intelligence agency. There must be considerations paid to
all involved for those rights and interests that compromise
such a
relationship. Otherwise, the CIA could effectively gain control of any domestic
corporation it so desires, without ever owning one share of its outstanding stock,
simply by enlisting its product or services for the sake of national security. The CIA
requires a formal vehicle to enlist the aid of our domestic commercial enterprises.
ISC is a proven and unfortunate example of that. This victim was a shareholder of
record of International Signal & Control (ISC) for the previous four years prior to
when this tragic ordeal began. The victim was to purchase the stock from now
Republican Pennsylvania Senator Gib Armstrong, who was in the brokerage business
at the time and selling ISC stock. The stock was sold over the London Securities
Exchange, supposedly for reasons to suppress information. The victim was
interested in the stock because of his appetite for technology, and was more curious
about the business of ISC, than anything. In fact, the victim had never made any
inference to any of the illicit dealings with Iraq. However, the perpetrators of this
story, attempt to hide behind a vale of national security," in an effort to find legal
immunity from all wrongdoing. In accordance, the record will prove that this is
merely a smoke screen used to intimidate and obstruct the victims access for due
process of the law. The trials and tribulations of this victim are unprecedented in terms of
emotional and psychological duress, fortunately his indestructible faith in God, and
his enduring belief in himself and the truth, endures his life. There was one attempt
on the his life, days within the public disclosure of the CIAs involvement with the
local Lancaster County defense contractor (ISC), which Ted Kopel reported on ABC
News Nightline, on May 23, 1991, 4 years after the initial cover up began. This story
will depict a series of systematic and strategic offensive attacks upon this victim
and his businesses that will result failed business enterprises, and a Hollywood
motion picture, deserted. An impeccable professional reputation and a flawless
credit rating purposely sabotaged. Financial opportunities, that in 1987, were almost
impossible to extrapolate, Vast financial opportunities and aspirations forever a part
of history. This horrendous crime was
perpetrated for the interest of a cover up, further protecting the corrupt
enterprises of Lancaster County's International Signal & Control
(ISC). A quest for justice that polarized every relationship the victim maintained, in
Lancaster County and beyond, including friends and family. This story demonstrates
a methodology of his perpetrators for keeping this victim quarantined from justice
and public disclosure, through a malicious means of credibility proponents, and
horrendously deceptive tactics. Financial motives prominently displayed in the
hands of all of the perpetrators, which absolves the burden for a traditional
conspiracy.. The emotional response to the truth of this story is compelling, to say the
least. Subsequently, the startling keen sense of perception that the victim had
demonstrated, is even more intriguing. It is this extraordinary quality that is
responsible for saving his life, while yet at the same time providing his perpetrators
with an alibi and a vehicle for discrediting his startling allegations and his story. This
story embellishes a dichotomy of perception that had Hollywood producers from his
film project call his work genius, while his perpetrators from the Lancaster County
Community conveniently and maliciously labeling him as insane and emotionally
disturbed." THE LANDSCAPE The perplexing
question of the victims intelligence, or lack thereof, is best analyzed as a question
of perception. However it terms of the legal consequences of the activities
contained herein, they are of little if any relevancy. The fact of the matter is that the
mental deficiencies have very little relevancy to this story, other than serving as a
means to discredit the victim, a vehicle to facilitate the cover up, and a blanket of
immunity for all of the perpetrators. The heart of this victims legal dogma is best described as
follows: If a person, is perceived to have a mental deficiency; yet whose actions
and decisions are always proven to be instinctually and amazingly prudent, always
abiding within the law, and in the best interest of his affairs, what rights and
protection do the laws afford him from persons abusing that perception, in order to
yield political and financial rewards, as a direct consequence of his demise?
Furthermore, how does the law protect his rights, if any and all malicious acts
against this victim, are constantly and immediately disregarded because he is
perceived to not to be credible? As this story unfolds, these questions will become
even more troubling and appalling. Although the victim could never describe the
pain of his trauma, he would often say that the closest situation that may compare
is that of a woman being continuously raped, night after night, helplessly praying
for relief, struggling to free herself from her captor, all with no avail. He would call it
as being brain f------. The victim, coming from the lower middle class of Lancaster City, was
only 29 years old when this tragedy began. Coming from a broken home, he was the
third of six boys. While at a very young age, he would help his mother run a dry
cleaning business, in an amazing similarity like Lisa Michelle Lambert, he had also
nursed his mother during bouts of depression. While in high school, he was nursing
his mothers depression, while at same time tending to his older brothers bouts of
schizophrenia. The victim had learned to listen to the obscenities of mental illness
since he was a child. He learned to fill the shoes of his absent father in helping his
mother raise his three younger brothers.. The victim was often called the little old
man because of his extraordinary maturity as a child. The victim was determined
to break the barrier of the Good Ole Boys club or the power elite, and had
always felt a sense of compassion for those less fortunate, and those neglected by
those of material means, the oppressed and impoverished. He had an undivided
aspiration to someday make a difference to those that could not help themselves,
especially his older brother. Through his ingenious, resourceful, and honest business
approach, he was relentlessly growing his business and their respective missions, in
constant reminder of his oppression. His in depth understanding of computer
technology and his vision were his most powerful allies. Always pushing the
envelope for advanced technologies and seeking solutions for the most efficient
means of his operations.. He knew that every break was going to be few and far
between, he dedication himself to his work, and married his business affairs, always
embracing his projects with a passion. In 1986, after serving on the Board of Directors for the Central
Pennsylvania Chapter of International Association of Financial Planners (IAFP), the
victim had made a large contribution to increasing its membership and its
awareness among local professionals, as its vice president. In an effort to promote
the organization, the victim solicited a nationally recognized and prominent financial
planner from Washington, D.C., to be a headline speaker at a dinner meeting. Ms.
Alexandra Armstrong, one of the most nationally recognized financial planners,
often headlined in Money Magazine, attracted 100 industry professionals to the
Treadway Resort Inn. The attendance was unprecedented for the local IAFP chapter.
The IAFP is the authoring organization for certification as a financial planner. It was
through the direct conversations with Ms. Armstrong regarding his ideas and her
experience, that inspired the victim to pursue his ambitions of growing his own
financial firm, which he began in the following months. Disgruntled with the conflicts of
interest and the lack of incentive for various professionals to work together in
managing ones wealth, a process which lacked efficiency, this entrepreneur
founded the firm Financial Management Group, Ltd., or FMG as it was often called.
The firm was to incorporate a one-stop-shopping strategy and incorporate
financial services, legal, accounting, tax preparation, real estate, insurance,
mortgage banking, and estate services all in one firm, all residing in one location, all
taking advantage of the synergistic approach toward managing wealth. And to
provide the professionals long term security and equity participation, all participants
were encouraged to purchase stock in the company. This was a new and innovative
approach that attracted a lot of attention from investors and clients, but also came
a lot of nervous twitches from competitors, especially in conservative Lancaster
County. The victim
began recruiting professionals from all of the other firms, with great success. He had
enlisted two partners whom he had worked with at IDS/American Express, to carry
out his mission, which he began after extensive market studies and his early version
of the company, Pro Financial Group, Ltd., His two partners had followed the victim
to an independent broker dealer in Atlanta, named Financial Services Corporation,
where Ms. Alexandra Armstrong was associated, and encouraged the victim to visit,
during their discussion after dinner. Within one year, by June of 1987, the firm had
invested over $40 million for respective clients. The company had developed
satellite offices throughout Pennsylvania and in several other states, through his
unique design. This firm was causing the other financial services companies and the
local banks in Lancaster County a run for their money. The firm had built a new
20,000 square foot office building just a few miles north of the city. The firm was
attracting clients, associates, and nervous attention from, well just about everybody.
Considering the capabilities, legal, real estate, insurance, financial services,
accounting, FMG was making as many enemies as it was making friends. And the
victim always believed in the premise that its always better to have people talking
about you, regardless of the matter, than to have no one notice you. And they were
talking. The victim was only in his late twenties when he started this organization,.
He held several positions, he was Executive Vice President and Secretary of
Financial Management Group Ltd, and President of FMG, Advisory, Inc., which was
one of the many subsidiaries parent company owned. The victim acted as the
architect and legal administrator of the organization, in addition to building his own
financial planning clients. He filed all of the articles of incorporation in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and submitted all of the tedious and rigorous filings
necessary for the Pennsylvania Securities Commission, which were very demanding
considering the victim was selling stock of his company to his associates and
investors. The victim and his associates had also attracted some very prominent
Lancastrianss to invest in his venture, coming from various professional circles, all
infatuated with this extraordinary and intriguing concept of this young victim. All
had seen its potential for success and financial reward. Many of his friends were involved,
and in Lancaster, everyone knows everybody, so it seams.. And everyone talks,
gossip is as common as jogging. This exaggerated trait of Lancaster County, will
later to come back to haunt this victim, in a way that is most sickening. In a way
that will parallel the attitudes and sentiments in the Lisa Michelle Lambert
story. In 1987,
his business affairs were reaching a point of incredible success. In fact, most of his
family and friends, have always questioned the merits of their legitimacy. He always
conducted his affairs with the presumption that time could not afford the
opportunity to complete his agenda, while at the same time disclosing his business
affairs to persons that were not directly involved.. Accomplishing his mission was
first and foremost. But in Lancaster County, that was difficult. Lancastrianss have a
notion to fear what they dont know, and will always believe what they think they
know, regardless of its merits. In Lancaster County new ideas are shunned unless
coming from their own, and their own ideas are often kept close at bay, inhibiting
progress and stymieing learning. By June of 1987, a majority of his business affairs
were conducted out of the grasp of Lancaster County, his unknown activities made
others curious, especially in Lancaster County, where the blessing of the power elite
was essential for success. But, deep down inside, he knew he could never be
accepted, because he did not descend from a family of social grace. This fueled
his aspirations for success even further, committed to prove that intelligence was
innate and learned, not a direct correlation to material wealth or social
grace. One of his
most cherished testimonials to his concept, his reputation, and his mission, was
provided by an elder attorney, Mr. Kenellm Shirk, a very respected and prominent
older Lancaster attorney, who was part of the status quo. Mr. Shirk had petitioned
the Pennsylvania Bar Association, after meeting with the victim, to obtain their
blessing and their knowledge of any laws which would forbid his firm to provide a
satellite office in the headquarters of Financial Management Group, Ltd., (FMG) Mr.
Shirks firm was to provide a partner, and estate services to the clients of FMG. The
Pennsylvania Bar provided a lengthy recommendation that did not prohibit a
relationship, although cautioned it to proceed with careful review. The fact that the
very young and unknown victim could attract an elder, conservative Lancaster
County attorney to associate with his firm was an encouraging sign of respect.
Ironically, Mr. Shirk is the father of Roy Shirk Jr., Lisa Michelle Lamberts first attorney
who represented her during trial of 1992, the proceeding which was the center of
Judge Dalzalls controversial and appalling findings. The victim prided himself on his
entrepreneurship , and after building the foundation for FMG, he set out to take
advantage of its resources and its synergism. By June of 1987, the victim had developed a fairly
substantial mortgage banking relationship with a Houston, Texas banker. That
operation was capable of providing lending to potential developers and businesses
in the range of $ 3 million to $100 million. And the lending packages were as
competitive if not more competitive than the local lending institutions of Lancaster
County, capable with even higher lending limits. In a matter of months of securing
this relationship, the victim and his partner were evaluating deals from
Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, Florida, and as far away as California.
Verdana">There was a
uniqueness to his capabilities that was very appealing to potential borrowers.
Because of the vast array of services of FMG, potential developers had the
opportunity to obtain both debt and equity financing through his companies. In plain
terms, most shopping centers raised capital by raising funds through investors
coupled with a mortgage. This gave potential developers one place to take down
the deal rather than dealing with many other professionals at the same time. It
was a much more efficient process for all. The victim was capable of providing a
mortgage, while at the same time selling shares in a shopping center through its
vast client base of investors at FMG. This also gave the victim a formidable
presence into the venture capital markets, by way of his strong ability to raise
capital through his vast portfolio of clients of FMG. And this was a rarity that
developers and investors loved. Investors were attracted because they could invest
in equity type real estate projects with real sense of knowing the developer, or
kicking the bricks of the project. This was far different than investing in a
nationally syndicated project, with properties scattered all over the country, and
with developers that they did not know. The synergistic approach to his organization
began paying dividends by developing other peripheral markets and
businesses. Given the complex nature of the victims design of FMG, internal
struggles within the organization readily became the challenge. Orchestrating the
relationships among all of the different professionals, and trying to adhere to the
interests of the clients, the professionals and of the firm, FMG, managing the daily
activities required immense thought and prudence on the part of the principals. Of,
course, the victim assumed honesty and integrity to be a given. And for most it was.
However there were times when the senior partner engaged in tactical rights of
power. In the
later part of 1986, after the victim had developed FMG to the point where its future
was on stable grounds, his two partners conveniently attempted to circumvent his
position and regain control of his stock and the firm. In fact, after the victim refused
to collaborate on a scheme to set up his other partner, the remaining two
partners began to attempt to regain the victims control. Through intimidating
techniques, the partners began to attack his presence. The victim became agitated,
especially because he played the lead role and was responsible for the formation of
the company, methodically designing and developing its foundation, with great
success. And now after the company was beyond its point of greatest risk, due to in
large part the victims efforts, the other two partners wanted to take advantage of
his work, and take the cream of the pie for their own financial gain. It was a
difficult task to carry out because the victim was the most respected of all three
partners, consistently keeping their respective policies in the best interest of the
firm and of the other associates and stockholders. In fact, most feared that the loss
of control of the victim would ultimately lead to adverse consequences. However
the two partners trued unsuccessfully to weaken his position, and when that didnt
work, they focused on weakening the victim, via intimidation and humiliation The
coup and hostile environment caused a state of depression for the victim, although
he kept to his daily duties and responsibilities, accordingly, he called a client and
friend who was a psychiatrist, whom he trusted and respected. It was easy access
to a professional, yet on a very informal basis. Because the victim had a family
history of mental deficiencies, he wanted to seek the proper help.
Verdana">The psychiatrist
had diagnosed the victim as having Bi Polar Mood disorder. The psychiatrist had
quickly discounted any correlation between the current state of affairs, and his
partners abuse. The psychiatrist rationale was that because the startup of the
company was so successful in such a short period of time , and his demonstrated
intelligence and creativity, the victim must have been in a state of mania, and of
course now, was subsiding in a state of depression, the typical cycle for manic
depressants. The victim complied with the psychiatrist. And after refusing to sell out
to his partners, vowed to regain his business and rescind any efforts to give up his
claim to his accomplishments. The depression soon faded. The victim never
disclosed the fact that he had sought help to anyone other than family members.
This coup lead to the victims aggressive approach to grow the business, and to
posture himself in projects that would ultimately remain in his control, out of the
influence of his partners. Particularly the mortgage banking activities and the digital
movie, which he did successfully, but apparently too
successfully. THE DIGITAL MOVIE Through an act of
fate, in February of 1987, the victim found himself in a meeting with Tony Bongiovi at Power
Station studios. Through one of his partners, he reluctantly traveled to New York to
consider financing a motion picture. The victims own lack tolerance for the risk
associated with film investments was overshadowed by the opportunity to visit a
recording studio. Although his associate was a friend of Tonys, he was not familiar
with his accomplishments, or his work, so he thought. If nothing else, it was a
weekend away from Lancaster, and a chance to visit the Big Apple. Intriguingly, he
found more than he had ever imagined on that weekend excursion. Tony Bongiovi, a
musical genius, whos credits include one of the most recognized recording studios
in the country, Power Station Studios. Tony Bongiov produced the sound track for
Star Wars, and is responsible for the format of one of the most successful
recording artist of the 80s, Jon Bon Jovi, his cousin. Power Station
has
recorded the albums for some of the most influential artists of all time, including
Diana Ross, Madonna, The Rolling Stones, Steve Winwood, Bruce Springsteen, etc.,
Tony, an eccentric genius, of Italian decent, had many talents, from music to
aerospace engineering. The victims associates sister met Tony while he flew his
plane into Lancasters airport for repairs. They dated for some time and the victims
associate and Tony became friends, which led the victim to Tonys Power Station
Studios. Tony was
looking to finance his new project, which was to be the first digital movie. And,
given the victims extreme appetite for technologies, coupled with his amazing
sense of perception, he dramatically recognized the future evolution for the
technical merits of delivering digital video and digital audio entertainment to the
mass markets. By June of 1987, the victim was positioned as the Executive
Producer, collaborating with Flatbush Films of Hollywood California, the movie
producers, entrusted with the mission of finding investors to provide funding for the
first digital movie, and to manage the ensuing business elements it
required. The movie
was to be shot on-location at the Jersey shore points, mostly in Wildwood. Tony
strategically envisioned making a movie in the horror genre. There were several
specific reasons that supported this strategy. First, he determined that it was the
least expensive format to produce, we all estimated a budget of $4 million for the
production and post production. Secondly, the horror genre would compliment a
very intense sound track. The sound track was important to enhance the new digital
format, and also provide the means to introduce a new band that he had been
grooming in his studio for the past several years, French Lick, his predecessor to
Bon Jovi. There had been bad blood between Tony and his cousin Bon Jovi, which
resulted in legal disputes pertaining to Tonys financial interests in Jons success. It
was an unfortunate situation considering Tonys father and Jons father were
brothers living in the same area. It was a subject that Tony never wanted to discuss,
except for his contributions toward Jons career. If by another act of fate, the victim had the privilege
of meeting one of the many superstars while working at Power Station studios.
While growing up, at an early age, the victim would sneak up into the bedroom of
his oldest brother, and start up his old General Electric stereo phonograph and listen
to his favorite album - Diana Ross and the Supremes. It was a passion and a ritual
that provided an early infatuation to music, and to Diana Ross. The victim was only
10 or 11 years old. And at this early age, he noticed and listened to the annoying
hiss, that conventional hiss that always seemed to overshadow the music, whether
played on an album, on the radio, 8-track tape, or cassette. And in a mystical twist of fate, while
engrossed in a project dedicated to delivering music without that hiss (digital) - the
victim opened the door to the recording suite to pack his bags for the journey back
to Lancaster; - and there she sat, with a glowing array of beauty, more beautiful
than any picture could ever tell, Ms. Diana Ross. She was pregnant and in the
middle of a recording session, for a new album. Her assistant quickly demanded, in
a stern and protective voice, that we leave, and the victim and his associate replied
this is our makeshift bedroom, we are just gathering our belongings. The victim
walked toward Diana Ross, who was seated near his bag, and she asked and who
are you?, the victim calmly replied his name and absorbed as much of her beauty
as his eyes could behold before walking out the door. The room that was
his
bedroom the nigh before, and suddenly transfixed into the recording suite of Diana
Ross, thinking back some twenty years earlier, one of the many gifts that God would
bestow upon him. A living memorial and reminder to his older brother, who died on
Christmas day of 1985, his best friend who taught him two of his greater pleasures
in life, Diana Ross, and listening to music. He prayed that his brother was watching
from above. And so, the digital movie project that the victim had embraced in 1987
had personal significance, and he never ever doubted his instincts regarding the
technical merits of the project. The victims perception that the entertainment
industry would deliver full length motion pictures in a truly digital medium will later
become a truly remarkable vision. The technical merits of this project and at this particular time
with respect to the victims extreme sense of perception require analysis. To truly
understand this time perception, some of the attributes of digital technologies need
to be fully understood. In 1987, Compact DISC (CD) technology was only now being
introduced to the commercial markets. The victims own crafting of his joint venture
proposals, dominated by the term digital movie, is in itself some 4 or 5 years
away. In 1987, there was very little use of the term digital, with the exception of
research and development engineers. The victim will, throughout the
documentation of this story, will have preceded a terminology that has literally
become the root of most technological advancements in the computer and
telecommunications industries of our present day, 10 years after the victims vision.
Today, digital is found to be part of or referred to in just about every product
available in the commercial markets. During May of 1987, the victim had created a joint venture
proposal for SONY Entertainment, Inc., for the digital movie. After weeks of
researching the current state-of-affairs within SONY, and after his proposal was
completed, SONY publicly announced their desire to open the markets for new and
emerging technologies on the cover of TIME magazine, another demonstrated sense
of perception. It was this proposal, when delivered to one of the Hollywood
producers in Santa Monica, California, after reading a draft of the proposal she said
you are a genius. The proposal was introduced to Tony Bongiovi at the Wildwood
Boardwalk, where many of scenes were to be shot, and he approved of the proposal
and thought that it had great merits. Tony, who wanted very to do with the business
elements of his project, gave the victim complete authority to secure the financing
of the project, with a salary as Executive Producer, and a percentage of the profits
on the back end. After review of the victims research and proposals, his vision and his
passion, unfortunately without his efforts, has come to be known as Direct Satellite
System, or DSS, which is Sonys satellite entertainment system (TV), delivering
digital audio and digital video entertainment. That technology is fast eroding at the
cable industry. The victim had his patent research center around the PSDMS system,
the Power Station Digital Movie System. And that was in 1987, some seven years
before SONY delivered his dreams. Later the victim would also accurately predict
that the 90s would become the Information Age because of the direct
contributions and advancements of digital technologies, which is directly
responsible for the development of the INTERNET. The victims obsession with his
digital movie has proven to be one of his most remarkable demonstrations of his
keen sense of perception. </DIV>
UNIX TARPIT ARTICLE
<div style="text-align: center; font-family: Verdana;">Escaping the UNIX1 Tar Pit Producing CD-ROMs in the UNIX
Environment Authored &
Published in January of 1991 </div> Stan J. Caterbone Director of CD-ROM Technologies
for American Helix Technology Director of Advanced Media Group, Ltd. 1857 Colonial
Village Lane Lancaster, PA 17601. Phone: (800) 525-6575 Fax: (717) 392-
Verdana;">John S. Garofolo Computer
Scientist National Institute of Standards and Technology Technology Building,
Verdana;">Room A-216 Gaithersburg, MD 20899 Phone: (301) 975-
Verdana;">Email: john@ssi.ncsl.nist.gov <div style="text-align:
justify; font-family: Verdana;">UNIX is a trademark
of American Telephone and Telegraph, Inc. (AT&T). 2Disclaimer: Certain trade
names and company products are mentioned in the text in order to adequately
specify procedures and equipment used. In no case does such identification imply
recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and
Technology, nor does it imply that the products are necessarily the best available for
the purpose. Just when things are going smoothly, and we begin
to feel a little too comfortable and too confident with CD-ROM technology, someone
or something puts us in our place -- and thankfully so. It's these challenges that
facilitate our progress toward broadening the horizons of CD-ROM
technologies. This article is intended to inform publishers and
manufacturers of the problems that can be encountered in using UNIX tar-formatted
files as a medium of data submission for CD-ROM production and some of the issues
confronting the next generation of CD-ROM publishers. Databases developed on
non-DOS-based3 systems which have performance requirements that exceed MS-
DOS capabilities are becoming more commonplace. Ironically, the existing CD-ROM
production infrastructure has been created and supported primarily by DOS-based
systems. Although we are making progress in publishing data on other platforms, a
large majority of the CD-ROMs published today are still designed on DOS machines
for use on DOS machines. The current tendency to link CD-ROM with DOS is making
difficult the implementation of CD-ROM technology on non-DOS systems and,
therefore, slowing its widespread acceptance. 3DOS is a trademark of the
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and MS-DOS is a trademark of
the Microsoft Corporation. The ensuing paragraphs illustrate the need for
the CD-ROM industry become more in tune with the trends which are shaping
information technologies. CD-ROM, which is one such information technology, is
beginning to recruit a new breed of both users and publishers, which are hoping
that CD-ROM will adapt to them, as opposed to them having to adapt to it. The
Automated Speech Recognition Group of the National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) is one such CD-ROM publisher. The NIST Automated Speech Recognition
Group Sponsored in part by the Defense Advanced Research Projects
Agency Information Science and Technology Office (DARPA-ISTO), the group designs
and implements methods of performance evaluation for spoken language systems.
These systems consist of natural language understanding as well as speech
recognition components. Additionally, it distributes databases, or corpora, of speech
recordings as standard reference material for the development and evaluation of
these systems. Traditionally, these speech corpora have been recorded
and stored in a digital form rather than in an analog audio format. This allows the
data to be easily loaded, stored, and manipulated in computers and prevents signal
degradation in copies. The speech is digitized at a sampling rate of between 10 and
20 kHz., as opposed to the 44.1 kHz. sampling rate used in CD-audio. Digitizing
speech at these sampling frequencies keeps intact the properties of the speech
signal that are important for automatic speech recognition while minimizing storage
requirements. These corpora typically consist of thousands of spoken phrases or
sentences which are stored in separate files for ease of computer
manipulation. In the mid 1980's, the NIST began an archival/lending
library for public domain speech corpora. The corpora were originally maintained
and distributed on half-inch reel-to-reel digital magnetic computer tapes. Initially,
these corpora were small, but as recognition systems became more sophisticated,
their appetite for "training" data grew tremendously. By the end of the decade these
corpora were each occupying 50 or more 6250 bpi. half-inch magnetic tapes and
even larger databases were on the horizon. Managing these colossal databases of
speech had become a real problem. Simply storing, copying, and distributing the
corpora had become unwieldy. Furthermore, maintaining the integrity of the corpora
was even more difficult as tapes were frequently damaged in shipment or by rogue
tape drives. NIST and CD-
ROM By early 1988, the NIST Automated Speech Recognition Group
had begun investigating optical disk storage technologies as a means of replacing
its tape archives. Initially, Write-Once Read- Many (WORM) technology was
considered for use as a universal distribution medium but was found to lack
adequate standardization. Fortunately, in the Spring of 1988, the ISO-9660 file
format standard for CD-ROM was adopted and CD-ROM was chosen by NIST as a
new "experimental" medium for distributing speech corpora. NIST decided
that the first corpus to be produced on CD-ROM would be the DARPA "TIMIT"
Acoustic-Phonetic Continuous Speech Corpus. Under DARPA sponsorship, TIMIT was
jointly designed, recorded, transcribed, and archived by Texas Instruments (TI) , the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), SRI International, and the National
Bureau of Standards (now NIST). The TIMIT corpus was designed to provide speech
data for the acquisition of acousticphonetic knowledge and for the development and
evaluation of automatic speech recognition systems. The corpus contains recordings
of 630 speakers from 8 major dialect divisions of American English each speaking
10 phonetically-rich sentences. In addition to standard orthographic (text)
transcriptions, TIMIT contains unique time-aligned phonetic
transcriptions. NIST felt that TIMIT's unique structure would be of great
interest to speech researchers and, therefore, would probably be ideal for
widespread publication on CD-ROM. NIST decided to publish two-thirds of the corpus
on a "prototype" CD-ROM. Because of the ISO-9660 restrictions on filename length
and format, the chosen two-thirds of the corpus to be placed on CD-ROM was
restructured from a flat directory structure with lengthy unique UNIX filenames into
a dense 5-level directory hierarchy, which reflected the design of the corpus and
conformed to ISO-9660. The resulting directory structure contained 4200 bottom-
level subdirectories -- one for each sentence-utterance, and 3 files per utterance for
a total of 12,600 data files! This new organization required the use of the entire
path and filename to uniquely identify a file but was "visually
navigable." To date, more than 200 "TIMIT Prototype" discs have been
distributed to universities and speech research laboratories worldwide. The discs
were well received by the speech research community and have been read on PC's,
Macintoshes4, various UNIX systems, NeXT5 machines and MicroVAXes6. The
"experiment" had proved to be successful. As of this writing, NIST has
produced four releases of speech corpora on eight discs. Recently, NIST completed
production of its most ambitious speech disc so far. The new disc is a complete
revision of the TIMIT Prototype disc and contains the speech for the complete 630-
speaker corpus as well as all-new time aligned word-boundary transcriptions. The
new TIMIT CD-ROM contains 25,200 data files (4 files per utterance) as well as more
extensive documentation and software utilities. After the production of
the TIMIT prototype disc, NIST recognized the need to distribute speech 4Macintosh
is a trademark of Apple Computer, Inc. 5NeXT is a trademark of NeXT, Inc. corpora
in a consistent format. Unfortunately, no standard file format existed for storing and
exchanging speech signals. Compounding this problem, almost every speech
research laboratory around the world used different hardware and software
configurations for speech signal processing and analysis. A UNIX-Based CD-ROM Preparation
Workstation In order to implement a full scale CD-ROM production
effort, the Automated Speech Recognition Group built a UNIX-based CD-ROM
publishing workstation, which also doubles as a general-purpose speech research
system. CD-ROM images are prepared on a Sun Microsystems server system with 32
megabytes of main memory, 3 gigabytes of high-speed magnetic disc storage, a 9-
track tape drive, an 8mm tape drive, and of course a CD-ROM drive. The
workstation contains two 1.2 gigabyte magnetic disc drives on which entire CD-ROM
images can be assembled and simulated. Each CD-ROM is now organized
entirely in the UNIX environment. Many of the standard UNIX utilities and
capabilities have proven ideal tools for CD-ROM preparation. Tar files are now
submitted for CD-ROM replication on one 8mm tape, instead of 5 or 6 half-inch reel-
to-reel tapes. UNIX-based CD-ROM premastering software is planned to be
added in the near future to help alleviate some of the complications NIST has
experienced in submitting data for replication. By performing ISO-9660 formatting in
house, an ISO-9660 image can be submitted to the replication facility. The ISO-9660
image can then be directly loaded into a mastering system thus circumventing the
problems which can occur downloading tar-formatted files. NIST has
developed strategies to maximize the portability of its CD-ROMs by organizing
speech data into a consistent format and providing utilities which can be linked into
each laboratory's unique hardware and software systems. To accomplish this, a
flexible, object-oriented header structure was developed for the exchange of speech
files, especially on CD-ROM. The header is an ASCII-based structure prepended to
each speech file and allows an utterance to be uniquely identified (even if the file is
copied from CD-ROM and inadvertently renamed) and describes basic attributes of
the speech signal to aid in digital to analog operations. A set of software utilities
have been written, "Speech Header Resources" (SPHERE), to provide a low-level
interface for importing and manipulating these files. NIST now publishes all speech
data in this more consistent format. A
Data Submission Problem All of the key components for efficient CD-
ROM production were in place at NIST, except for a vehicle for data submission.
When NIST initially delved into the world of CD-ROM production, it was dismayed to
learn that most CD-ROM replication facilities accepted only standard ANSI labeled or
ISO-9660 imaged tapes as transfer media. The small Automated Speech Recognition
Group could not justify the expense of purchasing a special-purpose premastering
workstation dedicated to creating ISO-9660 tapes. Neither could NIST provide
standard ANSI-labeled tapes because the simple structure of ANSI-formatted files
would not preserve the extensive directory structure required by the many files
typically contained in speech corpora. The UNIX tar Answer? The tar-formatted tape is the standard
medium of data exchange in the UNIX world and NIST had been successfully
distributing speech corpora on "tar tapes" for several years. The UNIX tar (Tape
Archive) utility was designed to create a portable archive format for UNIX files. The
tar program generates a single file (usually on magnetic tape) which contains all of
the information necessary for reconstituting directories, files, and UNIX-specific file
parameters. What distinguishes the tar utility from most other archive programs is
that the archive format it creates is portable across machines and operating
systems. The key to the tar format's portability is in its simplicity. Tar does not
employ any elaborate compression algorithms when generating an archive. It
simply creates a byte-for-byte copy of each file to be archived with a prepended
header block. The header block contains the path and name of the file (or
directory), the file size, the time of last modification, and UNIX ownership and
permission flags. Because the information in the each header block as well as the
file itself is byte-encoded, the tar file can be read by any system which can
recognize a stream of bytes. Of course, binary executable files are system-specific
and cannot usually be implemented on differing systems. But text, source code, and
binary data files can be easily exchanged. To date, the tar program has
been ported to many operating systems, including MS-DOS and VMS8 as well as the
many variants of UNIX. Because the tar format is portable and preserves directory
hierarchy, and because a tar file can be written to a standard ANSI-labeled tape or
any other storage medium, NIST concluded that tar formatted ANSI tapes would be
the ideal vehicle for providing a CD-ROM-ready file image to a replication plant.
Unfortunately, NIST has found that most replication plants either refuse to accept
tar-formatted files or they charge considerable "data conversion" fees to download
the files into their premastering systems. To say the least, the acceptance of tar as
an input medium for CD-ROM production has been less than universal by the CD-
ROM replication industry. The replication facilities that have ventured into the "tar
pit" with NIST have frequently encountered technical delays and cost overruns. In
theory, the tar-tape to CD-ROM process should be simple. But in reality, it
has rarely been straightforward to implement. Pitfalls in Extracting a CD-ROM Image
from a UNIX tar File The challenges encountered in producing a CD-ROM from a 630-
megabyte tar tape, which contains over 25,000 files, can at first seem
insurmountable. Several problems have occurred during production, some of which
are still not completely resolved. Downloading and extracting a CD-ROM image from
a tar file can be excruciatingly slow, taking 15 or more machine hours of time for a
single disc image. If a tar file is packed with thousands of files, unforeseen
complications can arise in the extraction process, and diagnosing and
troubleshooting all of the subsystems involved can become painful for even the
most experienced of engineers and technicians. Extracting the file
structure from a tar file for a CD-ROM such as the new TIMIT disc requires a great
deal of time and attention because of the extraordinary number of directories and
files. The subsystems involved in the tar extraction process require seamless
integration. These include the PC hardware platform and MS-DOS operating system,
the premastering system, the device drivers, controller cards, tape back-up
systems, and the tar utility. Limitations inherent in the MS-DOS operating system,
device drivers, and file structures can result in breakdowns in any one of these
subsystems resulting in the loss of hours of man and machine time in the
production process. Eight-mm tape subsystems can be especially
vulnerable when extracting exceedingly large numbers of files. This is because 8mm
tape drives are mechanically suited for streaming operations. They are not as
accommodating as 9-track tape drives in the quick stopping and starting
movements, which become necessary when extracting many thousands of small
files. Additional loss of efficiency occurs when 8mm drives must interface with a
system, which has become bogged-down with overloaded magnetic disk sub-
systems. The only way to optimize their operation is to load and buffer large blocks
of raw data before it is tar-extracted. Subtle problems may also arise when the
controller cards of some 8mm tape systems are not entirely compatible with the
publishing system being used. These and other unforeseen problems can cause a
tape drive to abort operations well before completion of the extraction process.
Worse yet, because the tar format does not guarantee that directories and files are
stored in any particular order, an entire tar file must be scanned to extract any
subset of files contained in it. If the tar-extraction process aborts before the end of
the tar file is reached, the entire process must be restarted from the beginning to
insure that all files are loaded. These constraints require that special efforts be
taken to prepare backup tapes and even second backup tapes during production.
This is one area of risk where the insurance is well worth the effort, and is within
one's control. Many of the other pitfalls are not as easy to anticipate or
avoid. One of the more frustrating problems encountered while
downloading the TIMIT tar file was that of the overhead created while extracting the
18,900 small transcription files. To illustrate this point, during the downloading of
the 632-megabyte tar file, containing the 25,241 TIMIT files, the process aborted on
650-, 850-, and 1200-megabyte partitions due to insufficient disc space!
 On UNIX systems, the size of file blocks (similar to the ISO-9660 and DOS
sector structures) can be modified. Although the ISO-9660 standard supports
different sector sizes, the individual operating systems used in the premastering
process may present problems. For example, MS-DOS 3.31 does not allow any
modifications to sector size. Fortunately, MS-DOS 4.0 is more
forgiving. The TIMIT tar file contained 18,900 transcription files of under
2Kb each. A premastering system running DOS 3.31 with a 16Kb sector size would
require over 300 megabytes of disk storage for these files, which actually amount to
less than 32 megabytes of data. This results in disk overhead of 1 order of
magnitude! However, by switching to DOS 4.0, the sector size can be reduced to as
little as 512 bytes. This significantly reduces the overhead being used by the DOS
partition. It is therefore important to adjust the sector size to accommodate the size
of the database files to be downloaded. To maximize disk usage, the sector size
should be set high when premastering a database with a few large textual files. But
when a database (such as TIMIT) contains many small files, the sector size should
be greatly reduced. Likewise, it is also important to allow for this kind of overhead
on the CD-ROM itself. Although CD-ROMs are generally created with a 2Kb sector
size, the sector size can be reduced on the ISO-9660 image in the premastering
phase to as little as 512 bytes. By decreasing the sector size on the TIMIT ISO-9660
image to 512 bytes, potential disc overhead was reduced by about 32
megabytes. Finally, a hidden source of potential problems lies within the
implementation of the utility used to extract the tar file. There are currently a
number of tar utilities that have been written and are in use today. Many of these
utilities are suboptimal in speed and efficiency. The time required for downloading a
tar file can become critical when extracting large numbers of files. Therefore, using
the right tar implementation is a must. The Real "Tar Pit" -- Universal Operability The real problem
facing the CD-ROM industry concerning the production of non-DOS-based discs lies
not in which utilities or platforms to use, but within the deeper abyss of universal
operability. Universal operability encompasses the common methodology of
transferring, publishing, and retrieving many different types of data across different
platforms, while using different hardware and software systems. Attempting to
extract a tar file into a DOS-based premastering system is a perfect example of why
universal operability is the next technical challenge for the CD-ROM industry at
large. If this issue is continued to be ignored, entire market segments will be left
paralyzed because of the inability to publish information from beginning to end
without experiencing compatibility problems. This bleak scenario could result in the
CD-ROM industry losing the acceptance and respect it has worked hard to
gain. The Challenge
Ahead This article has illustrated some of the potential problems,
which can result when using the UNIX tar format as a data submission medium for
CD-ROM replication. More importantly, it has shown that a much greater variety of
CD-ROM applications could blossom if the CD-ROM industry embraces a
diversification of CD-ROM platforms. The ISO-9660 standard has provided a good
basis for the exchange of CD-ROMs across different hardware and software
platforms. It is now time for the CD-ROM industry to address and overcome the
many obstacles faced by the challenge of universal operability. The increasing need
for a standard media- and platform-independent format for data submission is just
one such obstacle. In the short term, manufacturers of CD-ROM premastering
workstations should publish specifications indicating the limitations of their
systems. This would allow publishers and replicators of "atypical" CD-ROMs to avoid
many of unforeseen pitfalls they must now face. In the long term, these
premastering systems must be made more robust. The next generation of
CD-ROM publishers and users will help CD-ROM technology reach new heights, but
they will become far less forgiving as CD-ROM becomes more commonplace. For
NIST, the UNIX road to CD-ROM has certainly been "the road less traveled."
Currently, the development, production, and use of CD-ROM technology in UNIX and
other environments is still in its infancy. However, by increasing support for
development and production in these environments, CD-ROMs may someday be
produced and used on a variety of platforms as easily as they are on MS-DOS-based
systems today. It is only in this way that the CD-ROM will become the truly universal
medium of data exchange that it was intended to be. Acknowledgments The authors wish to
thank the following people which have helped them in their quest for solutions to
the problems this article has outlined: Joe Bradley and Clayton Summers at Philips
and Dupont 10Helgerson, L. W., "Universal Operability: The Technical Solution", Disc
Magazine, pp. 36-39, October 1990. Optical Co., Dennis Clark, formerly of Meridian
Data, Inc., Leon Whidbee and Gisele Venczel at Disc Manufacturing, Inc., Lance
Buder and Sylvester Pefek at Optical Media International, and Tom Brown at
Reflective Software. </div> 
1987 MORTGAGE BANKING
<div style="text-align: center;">Financial Management Group, Ltd. (FMG) </div><div
style="text-align: center;">
Institutional Investors of America, Inc. Financing,
Investments & Advisors </div> Allan D. Dannatt <div
style="text-align: left;">Managing General
Partner
 










 (713) 497-8010 </div> <div
style="text-align: center;">January 20,
1987 </div>HONORARY CHAIRMAN George S.
Moore Mr. Stan
Caterbone Financial Management Group 1775 Oregon Pike Lancaster, Pa
17601 Re: Mortgage Loans Commercial and
Residential Dear Stan: <div style="text-align: justify;">In
reference to the above captioned subject, enclosed please find a synopsis of our
lending programs. We are very interested in business in your part of the Country. I
will also be in a position to do some other business with you through the bank we
just purchased in 60-90 days. </div> Very truly yours, Allan
D. Dannatt President ADD/slh Enclosure <div style="text-align:
center;">777 North Eldridge Parkway, Suite 730 Houston, Texas
77079 <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"> </div> <div style="text-
align: center;">LOAN
PORTFOLIO CURRENT RATE QUOTES </div> Term Rate Pey
Rate Fee Amortization APARTMENTS Variable 10 yrs. 225
bp over Starting 1-2 pts. 30 Years OOF or 300 bp
@ 9% over 1 yr T-Bill Fixed 5 yrs. 9.5% 1-2 pts.
30 Years Fixed 7 yrs. 9.65%1 3/4 pts. 30 Years Fixed
Rates also available at 325 basis points over corresponding T-Bill Retail. Office,
Industrial RETAIL, OFFICE, INDUSTRIAL Variable 10 yrs.
300-350 bp over 1-2 pts. 30 Years 1 yr. T-Bill or 250 bp over
OOF Fixed 5-7 yrs. 8.75% Par-1 pt. 30 Years Fixed 10
yrs. 9% Par-1 pt. 30 Years <div style="text-align:
justify;">Similar terms available for mini warehouses, hotels, mobile hone parks,
nursing homes and ACLF facilities. Forward, standbys, open-ended and covered
construction- loans are also available. Maximum loan to value of
80%. Sale Leasebacks - We
are currently seeking to purchase $500 million in properties nationwide leased to
nationally listed public corporations with good credit ratings. Leases must be NNN
with a minimum of a 10 year term. Minimum cash investment $5-
$500m. REMICS - Beginning in
the 2nd Quarter of 1987, HA will be placing $100 million a month into real estate
investment mortgage conduits. Immediate funding loans will be made on all types
of Institutional quality property. </div> Rates quoted are best available
and may vary depending on location and quality of product. <hr
style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"> <div style="text-align: center;">Institutional Investors of America -
Houston, Texas Financing, Investments &
Advisors </div><div style="text-align:
center;">EXCLUSIVE APPOINTMENT TO OBTAIN FINANCING </div> Brooks
A. Boyd Vice President Gentlemen: (713) 497-8010 
 HONORARY CHAIRMAN CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD <div
style="text-align: justify;">The undersigned ("Applicant") hereby appoints
Institutional Investors of America ("Institutional Investors") as the exclusive agent of
Applicant for purposes of obtaining mortgage/equity funds for the subject property
commonly known as Village of Olde Hickory, Lancaster, Pennsylvania (the
"Property") from one or more lending institutions of Applicants selection. This
exclusive agency to obtain mortgage/equity funds in the amount and for the
purposes described below shall commence from the date hereof and shall continue
for a period of 60 days from the date that Institutional Investors receives all
required information requested of Applicant for proper Loan submission, including
but not limited to the loan submittal document checklist attached
hereto. </div>a) Loan Amount: $5,000,000 Second b)
Description and Type of Property: Mixed use including townhouses,
apartments, retail, golf course, racquetball club, community center, pool and
several small office buildings. c) Size of Building and Land: Land: 100
acres d) Age of Property: Approximately 17 years (project built in
different phases). e) Amount of unit(s) and unit mix: 400
units f) Description of Ownership and Status of Title: Boyd/Wilson
Company g) Rate of Interest: 30 day CD rate (6.85% as of 6/16/87) + 275
basis points or Prime Rate + 1 1/2% h) Term of Loan and Amortization:
Term: 5 years Amortization: Interest Only i) Prepayment Provisions: 4-6
months Interest j) Institutional Investors Commitment Fee:
$75,000 k) Lender's Loan Fee: 2% <div style="text-
align: justify;">3. The fee of Institutional Investors set forth herein shall be
deemed earned upon issuance of a commitment by a lending institution
substantially in accordance with the terms set forth herein whether such
commitment is accepted by Applicant or not. 4. It is agreed that all prior
understandings and agreements are fully expressed herein and are merged into this
application, and Applicant agrees that Institutional Investors has not made any
representations that Institutional Investors guarantees or has guaranteed that a
commitment by a lender will be obtained, or that Applicants acceptance of any
commitment obligates Institutional Investors to perform any provisions of the
commitment to be performed by a lender. 5. Applicant acknowledges
that (a) Applicant is in all respects authorized and qualified to execute this
application and to accept the requested financing or any modification thereof: (b)
Institutional Investors is not responsible for the qualification s of Applicant, or other
matters affecting the closing of the intended financing; (c) if an action is instituted
in any court relative to the collection or refund of any fee due Institutional Investors,
provided Institutional Investors shall prevail in such action, Applicant agrees to pay
all Institutional Investors' costs, expenses and fees in said action or appeal,
including, without limitation, reasonable attorney's fees; (d) the facts and
circumstances of this application took place within the State of Texas; (e) this facts
and circumstances of this application took place within the State of Texas; (e) this
application was negotiated, executed in and shall be governed by and subject to the
laws of the State of Texas; and (f) this application represents the entire agreement
between the parties and this application may be modified only by the written
agreement of the parties hereto. 6. Upon acceptance of financing
commitment, Applicant hereby authorizes Institutional Investors to advertise
through media, trade journals or other sources whatsoever that Institutional
Investors has been engaged by Applicant to obtain the financing provided herein
and that Applicant has obtained financing through the direct efforts of
Institutional Investors. 7. Applicant hereby agrees to execute all loan
documents presented in accordance with the terms hereof. 8.
Institutional Investors may rely on all information submitted to it by Applicant
and Applicant hereby agrees to indemnify and old Institutional Investors harmless
from all losses, costs or expenses incurred by Institutional Investors by virtue of any
action brought by a proposed lender in reliance of the information submitted by
Applicant. 9. The undersigned hereby tenders a Good Faith Deposit in
the amount of $5,000. In the event a loan is committed in accordance with the
terms and conditions of this application or on other terms acceptable to the
undersigned, 'the Good Faith Deposit shall be applied toward Institutional Investors'
fee. If the loan is not so committed, the Good Faith Deposit shall be refunded in full
by Institutional Investors less any specific traveling expenses incurred by
Institutional Investors. </div><div style="text-align:
left;">






 Very truly
yours', 






 Brooks A. Boyd
 






 Vice
President </div>ACCEPTED AND AGREED: By: Date: 
RADIO SCIENCE LABORATORIES
<div style="text-align: center;">RADIO SCINECE
LABRORATORIES, Ltd. <img style="width: 134px;
height: 224px;" alt=""
src="http://d15673896.u189.sitewebmasters.com/images/RSL%20Logo.jpg"
align="middle" border="0" hspace="0"
vspace="0"> Business Plan Stan J. Caterbone March
1989 </div><div style="text-align: justify;">TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION I) Introduction And
Overview <ul><li>Business Summary-Qualifications of Principals</li><li> Summary of Management
Team</li><li>
Summary of Financial Projections</li><li> Financing
Alternatives</li><li></li><li> Benefits to the Investor and/or
Lender </li></ul>II) The Microwave
Industry <ul><li> Description-Industry Statistics (National, State, &
Local)</li><li></li><li> The LNA Market</li><li> Competitors Analysis </li></ul>III) The
Low Noise Amplifier (The Product) <ul><li>Product
Description and Specifications</li><li> Product Uses</li><li> Product Patents, Trademarks & Copyright
Data</li><li> </li></ul>IV)
Marketing <ul><li>Marketing
Objectives</li><li></li><li> Price Strategies</li><li> Distribution Strategies </li></ul>V)
Operations <ul><li>Facilities</li></ul>Equipment Production Quality Control Shipping &
Packaging VI) The
Organization <ul><li>Organizational
Chart</li><li></li><li>Key Personnel</li><li> Outside Consultants</li><li> Labor force </li></ul>VI) Financial Projections <ul><li>Profit
Loss</li><li></li><li> Break Even Analysis </li></ul>VIII)
Appendix <ul><li>Resumes</li><li> Trade Literature</li><li>Market Research Data &
Statistics</li><li></li><li></li><li></li><li> Principals' Financial
Statements </li></ul> INTRODUCTION AND
OVERVIEW Business Summary: Radio Science
Laboratories, Inc. proposes to enter the Design and Manufacturing sector to the
RF/Microwave and Telecommunications Industry. Utilizing the talents of Design
Engineer and President, James A. Cross, Radio Science Laboratories, Inc. (RSL,Inc.)
will initially introduce a line of Ultra Low Noise Amplifiers. These amplifiers will be
marketed to the RF and Microwave Industry for a variety of applications including
the following: <ul><li>Satellite
Communications</li><li> Telemetry System</li><li> Radar</li><li> Radio Astronomy</li><li></li><li> Tracking and Direction Finding Systems</li><li> Optical
Verdana;"> Medical Instrumentation</li><li> Many Other Transmit/Receive
Environments </li></ul>Business Summary RSL, Inc. will provide superior products
through it's advanced Research and Design process. However, constant monitoring
on budgets and cash flows will serve as a check and balance against an unprofitable
Research and Development program.The first model, a Wide Band Ultra Low Noise
Amplifier, with a frequency range of 2MGz to 20GHz, will out perform the existing
market in its ability to reduce the noise level as much as 50%. This will in essence
give the receiving device a much higher signal, thus reducing the amount of
transmit power required to drive the system. This is directly correlated to the price
that the amplifier is worth. So you not only increase the performance, you also
increase the value of the device on the marketplace.Other Ultra Low Noise Amplifiers are
designed for specific narrow band applications. One of the most popular is the
17.2GHz to 17.7GHz narrow band which is the transmitting frequency for the Direct
Broadcast Satellite (DBS) system. This particular application is especially popular
in Europe. By
instituting a comprehensive, and aggressive Marketing program, Radio Science
Laboratories, Inc. will network several major sectors to develop a distribution
system that will compliment its product line as well as its Research and
Development Programs. Utilizing a Private Label program developed for smaller
companies, a consortium of established sales reps, and procurement
representatives for the government and military, along with in house marketing
programs. RSL,Inc. will depend on its ability to market its products in a low cost but
effective manner, which can be achieved by producing a superior product. Fiscal Management will not take a back seat to either Research
and Development or Marketing. RSL,Inc. will consider its tough and rigid Fiscal
Programs to be as much of an Asset as anything else on its Balance Sheet. With
high regard for Economic and Industry forecasts, RSL,Inc. will attempt to minimize
and limit its downside risks during all markets and all Business
Cycles. By utilizing a highly sophisticated Advanced
Technology Network System, utilizing the Hewlett Packard 9000 as the system
driver, the organization will be fully automated and integrated producing efficiency
and organization throughout. The following systems will be
included: <ul><li>Inventory
Control</li><li></li><li> Accounting & Reporting</li><li> Information
Management</li><li></li><li> Computer Assisted Design (CAD)</li><li></li><li> Automated Assembly Processing</li><li> Test and Design
System </li></ul>Complimenting the previous
Netwprk, will be the highly innovative Test and Research Equipment that will allow
engineers to be fully automated from design conception to the construction of a
working model, inclusive of all layout and artwork. To provide an efficient assembly
process, all laborers will be trained and educated to perform all tasks in the entire
process. This will accomplish two things; it will allow production to be fluid, and
even more important it will create a more motivated atmosphere allowing workers
to have more pride. More importantly, an ESOP
(Employee Stock Ownership Program), will be instituted, thus giving all workers a
sense of pride and security from Management that will support all employees
creating a complimentary and supportive relationship. QUALIFICATIONS OF
PRINCIPALS James A. Cross 1981

Since 1981 cross microwave
consultants has provided to the industry, rf and miowave component and systems
design. Some projects include:<ul><li style="font-family:
Verdana;">low noise Amplifiers 5 mhz to 27 ghz, Noise source design 2 to 18, ghz vco 10
mhz to 18 ghz, smt filters 5 mhz to
2.5 =hz,
 </li><li style="font-family: Verdana;">stripline, Microstrip
and suspended substrate filters 4 ghz to
20 ghz, qpsk </li><li>spread Spectrum radio
direct Sequence in compliance with
fcc part 15.247, in frequency range
of 800 mhz to 2.4 ghz. <o:p></o:p></li></ul>
 <o:p></o:p>

MS;">Developed Frequency
tracking
profile receiving system for identifying 2-18 ghz jamming Sources, 318 mhz
Fsk digital radio for
cardiac telemetry system , 1.4 ghz doppler
radar receiver , frequency synthesizer designs, 10 mhz to 1.2
ghz, qpsk digital telcom radio 10 Channel, at 700 mhz, 704 kb/ps data
rate, 2-20 mmic slope amplifier for driving 50
to 100 ft of teflon cable.

MS;"> 
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background: white none repeat scroll 0%; margin-

left: 0.95pt; line-height: 10.55pt; -moz-background-clip: -moz-initial; -moz-
background-origin: -moz-initial; -moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-initial; font-
family: Verdana;">2000 - Moseley,
Santa Barbara Ca Senior RF Design
Engineer<o:p></o:p>

spacing: -0.1pt;">Design Linear Power
Amplifiers For Multi Level Modulated Microwave Radios 650 Mhz 8
Ghz<o:p></o:p>

spacing: -0.1pt;">1999 - Itt Gaastek,
Roanoke Va Advanced Design
Engineer<o:p></o:p>

spacing: -0.1pt;">Design
Radar
Transmitter And Reciever 8-12 Ghz Eight Layer Board With Vertical Transitions
Coplanar To Strip Line, Stripline To
Microstrip<o:p></o:p>

spacing: -0.1pt;">1999 - Ail Labs,
Commack Long Island Ny Design Engineer<o:p></o:p>

spacing: -0.1pt;">Designed LNA
Amplifiers And Diplexers For Gen-Sat
Apllications<o:p></o:p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background: white none repeat scroll 0%; line-

height: 10.55pt; -moz-background-clip: -moz-initial; -moz-background-origin: -moz-
initial; -moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-initial; font-family: Verdana;">1998-1999 - Anaren
Microwave, Syracuse Ny Advanced Design
Engineer<o:p></o:p>
spacing: -0.1pt;">Designed
Feed-Forward Circuits, Hi-Power
Switches For Pcs And Cellular
Applications<o:p></o:p>
<o:p></o:p>

background-origin: -moz-initial; -moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-initial;">1996 1998 -
Philips Broadband Networks, Manlius
Ny: Staff Design
Engineer Consultant<o:p></o:p>

spacing: -0.1pt;">Designed Elliptical
Diplexer Filters 42-54, 55,70, 65-85 550,600 Mhz
For Return Amplifier Systems Designed 5 Mhz To 1 Ghz Broadband
Amplifier Systems For Cable Tv
Applications.<o:p></o:p>

spacing: -0.1pt;">1995-1996 -
Amplidyne Bellemead, NV Senior
Desig n
Engineer<o:p></o:p>

spacing: -0.1pt;">Design Of 10 -100
Watt Class A, Ab Feed Forward 800 Mhz To 2 Ghz Power Amplifiers For Pcs And
Cellular Applications.<o:p></o:p>

spacing: -0.1pt;">1995 - At&T
Middletown, NJ Consultant Summer <o:p></o:p>

spacing: -0.1pt;">Instructor For
Advanced Rf And Microwave Theory And
Design.<o:p></o:p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 10.3pt 0in 0.0001pt 1.2pt; background:

white none repeat scroll 0%; -moz-background-clip: -moz-initial; -moz-background-
origin: -moz-initial; -moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-initial;">1981-Present - Cross Microwave Consultants
Laguna Beach, California 

spacing: -0.1pt;"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--
>List Of Experience
Above. Trac Tel
Corporation Consultant 1986-1987 Laguna,
Beach, Ca<o:p></o:p>

spacing: -0.1pt;">Developed Video
Receivers And Transmitters 100 Mhz To 18 Ghz
Range.<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:
white none repeat scroll 0%; margin-left: 0.7pt; line-height: 10.55pt; -moz-
background-clip: -moz-initial; -moz-background-origin: -moz-initial; -moz-
background-inline-policy: -moz-initial; font-family: Verdana;">Developed 418 Mhz Doppler Tracking System1985-1990 Motorola,
Advanced Semiconductor Div. Phoenix, Az <p class="MsoNormal" style="background: white none
repeat scroll 0%; margin-left: 0.25pt; line-height: 10.55pt; -moz-background-clip:
-moz-initial; -moz-background-origin: -moz-initial; -moz-background-inline-policy:
-moz-initial;">Consultant Tested New Semiconductor Lines And Established Dc, Noise
And S-Parameter Data.<o:p></o:p>

spacing: -0.1pt;">1985-1990 - Microwave
Software, San Juan Capistrano, Ca Consultant Eastern Region
Distributor Tested Rf Microwave Design Software For Data format And
Operation.<o:p></o:p>

spacing: -0.1pt;">1985-1986 - Raydx
Satellite Systems, Ocala, Fl Senior Design
Engineer Designed Dbs Low
Noise Down Converter For C-Ku Band, Low Noise Amplifiers 2-18 Ghz, Designed C
Band Frequency Synthesizer, Used Saw Resonators For Various Oscillator
Designs, 2-18 Ghz
Vcos.<o:p></o:p> <!--[endif]--
><o:p></o:p>
left: 0.7pt; -moz-background-clip: -moz-initial; -moz-background-origin: -moz-initial;
-moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-initial;">Military: Us Navy
Honorable Discharge<o:p></o:p>

left: 0.25pt; -moz-background-clip: -moz-initial; -moz-background-origin: -moz-initial;
-moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-initial;">Education: Marquette University Bsee Gpa
3.8<o:p></o:p>

white none repeat scroll 0%; -moz-background-clip: -moz-initial; -moz-background-
origin: -moz-initial; -moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-initial;">Microwave
Integrated Amplifier And Oscillator Design Course By: Dr Allen Sweet And George
Vendelin. Subjects: S-Parameter Design, Yig Filters And Oscillators,
Temperature Stability Theory, Mic Processing Techniques, Thick Film
Design. Motorola 68000 Series Microprocessor School
Tempe, Az<o:p></o:p>

white none repeat scroll 0%; line-height: 10.55pt; -moz-background-clip: -moz-
initial; -moz-background-origin: -moz-initial; -moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-
initial;">Software
Experience 15 Years Experience
In Linear And Non Linear Active And Passive Modeling. Silvacos Smart-Spice,
Pspice,Intusoft Spice, Libra, Touchstone, Optoteks Mmicad
Linear
Analysis, Hp-Eesof Products, Cnl Linear And Nonlinear Microwave
Analysis, Tesla Systems Design. Super
Compact, Hp Appcad, Protel, Orcad,
Circuit Board Design. Misc.<p
class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 10.55pt 0in 0.0001pt 0.5pt; background: white
none repeat scroll 0%; line-height: 10.55pt; -moz-background-clip: -moz-initial;
-moz-background-origin: -moz-initial; -moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-
initial;">Listed in Who's Who in Electronic
Manufacturing and RF Microwave Wireless Design Stanley J. Caterbone Stanley J.
Caterbone: Mr. Caterbone is the Chief Executive Officer and will be responsible for
the management and the success of Radio Science Laboratories, Inc.. Mr.
Caterbone was the founder of Financial Management Group, Ltd., a diverse
financial service organization, providing financial services and products to its
clients. Mr. Caterbone was able to take an
idea discussed over breakfast in November of 1986, and by July of 1987 the
organization began operations in a new 20,000 square foot building in Eden Park
with 17 Professionals representing the following professions: <ul><li>Financial Planning</li><li> Legal & Estate Planning</li><li></li><li> Insurance</li><li> Real Estate</li><li> Portfolio & Security
Brokerage</li><li></li><li> Employee Benefits</li><li> Mortgage
Banking </li></ul>In the following months, FMG, Ltd.,
grew to include satellite offices in Philadelphia, Harrisburg, Reading, Camp Hill,
Lewisburg, Minneapolis MN, and Medford NJ. At the end of its first year, the
organization included as many as 60 professionals in various location. Mr. Caterbone was responsible for raising the initial capital of
nearly $400,000 for equipment and operation capital. The equity was secured under
Regulation D, Rule 144 of the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pennsylvania.
As Executive Vice President of FMG, Ltd., Mr. Caterbone Was responsible for the
design and installation of an advanced computer networking system, integrating a
host of software allowing the development of in-house Financial Plans, which was
regarded as one of the most comprehensive on the market. Mr. Caterbone served as
President of FMG Advisory, the Registered Investment Advisor. This wholly owned
subsidiary of FMG, Ltd., was responsible for the marketing of Fee-based Financial
Plans and Investment Advisory and Consulting services. Mr. Caterbone was instrumental in the conceptual and strategic
planning that he utilized in developing the Business Plan for the Organization. This
also included the acquisition of a minority interest in Planners Security Group, Inc. of
Atlanta, Georgia, which is a national Broker Dealer. The initial
budgets and pro forma that he developed, were found to be very instrumental in
managing the financial affairs of the organization through the critical and most
difficult first 12 months. Additional responsibilities included negotiating contracts
with recruitment, Insurance Contracts, and New Products. During Mr. Caterbone's tenure, the organization was raising over $80
million dollars of new investment capital annually, which surpassed the original
projections of the business plan by 3 years. His original stock holdings were sold for
a 500% gain in 2 years. Prior to starting Financial
Management Group, Ltd, Mr. Caterbone spent 5 years in the Financial Services
Industry primarily operating a Financial Planning practice. Mr. Caterbone will utilize his experience in strategic planning,
fiscal management, marketing, and most importantly the success of a start up
venture. SUMMARY OF MANAGEMENT TEAM Stanley J.
Caterbone: Stanley J. Caterbone will act as Chief Executive Officer and will be
responsible for the management of Radio Science Laboratories, Inc.. Mr. Caterbone
will utilize his past management experience to place an extreme amount of
importance upon developing a comprehensive Strategic Plan capable of directing a
successful and profitable organization. This Business Plan will chart a course of
action for RLS, Inc., that will not only be used to secure financing, but more
importantly as a Plan of Action to be closely monitored and constantly adjusted in
order to pursue the Goals and Objectives of the entire Organization. Far too many
start up companies only rely upon the Business Plan as a means of raising money,
and after they have accomplished that, the Business Plan is never to be seen again,
until they need additional capital. Unfortunately by that time it is too late because
now their business is in mass confusion, and raising new capitol is the only answer.
In order to minimize the downside risk of this business venture, it becomes
imperative to know precisely where your organization is and where your
organization is going. In order to initiate and pursue its
goals, Mr. Caterbone will demand a High emphasis on corporate Communications
from Top to Bottom. This will be implemented and supported by utilizing a highly
efficient and automated Management Information System. Installing a Local Area
Network and developing an advanced system of network technology to support the
following systems: <ul><li>Communications
Systems</li><li>Management Information Systems</li><li> Accounting & Inventory
Control</li><li></li><li> Marketing Research</li><li> Fiscal
Management</li><li> </li></ul>Employee Ownership: Mr. Caterbone will again use his strategy of
creating a dedicated and responsible organization by providing ownership of Radio
Science Laboratories, Inc. to all employees. Firmly believing that productivity is
ones vested interest in the overall success of the organization. An Employee Stock
Ownership Plan (ESOP) will be administered. This will accomplish the
following: <ul><li>Higher Employee
Retention</li><li></li><li> Better Working Environment</li><li>More Dedication &
Responsibility</li><li> </li></ul>Mr.
Caterbone attributes the fast and successful development of Financial Management
Group, Ltd., to the above strategy. This strategy often provides the means of
attracting highly Qualified Key Personnel to the organization and directly links
personal performance to the success of the organization. Mr. Caterbone will also rely upon the expertise of various outside
consultants in order to create a lean but effective management team. This will help
to reduce overhead without loosing the resources to build the successful
organization. A strong Fiscal Policy will be utilized
as an asset to provide the impeius necessary to reduce the risk associated with
start up companies. RSL, Inc., will implement specific strategies and techniques to
utilize all available resources and reduce capitol spending unless absolutely
necessary in respective situations. This will become extremely important regarding
capitol expenditure or plant & Equipment, and inventory control
procedures. Lynn C. Cross will serve as
Executive Vice President and will be responsible for Administration and Management
,of the labor force, Lab and Production. Ms. Cross' experience in managing an LNA
production facility will provide the ingredients for an efficient and profitable
Assembly and Production team. By using a strategy, Cross Assembly Stations, all employees will become
trained & educated on all jobs involving the production of an LNA. This helps
to create the following: <ul><li>Reduction in Downtime</li><li> Higher Productivity</li><li> Increased employee
moral</li><li></li><li> Increased Performance &
Quality </li></ul>An extreme emphasis upon training
and education will help to increase the longevity of the organization and the quality
of people. THE LOW NOISE AMPLIFIER (THE PRODUCT) Product Description and Specifications: A low noise amplifier (LNA) is a
high gain solid state amplifier that is used to boost, the very weak signal that is
received from the transmit source. There are several transmit/receive environments
in which the Low Noise Amplifier is vital to the performance of the
system: <ul><li>Satellite
Verdana;"> Telemetry Systems</li><li> Radar</li><li> Radio Astronomy</li><li></li><li> Tracking and Direction Finding</li><li> Optical
Verdana;"> Medical Instrumentation</li><li> Other Transmit/Receive
Environments </li></ul>The Low Noise Amplifier is vital to
the performance of the transmit/receive system because of its ability to boost the
very weak signal (usually about 100,000 times or 50 DB) by reducing the noise at
the front end of the radio or Microwave Frequency, which greatly reduces the overall
cost of the system. The RF or radio frequency is the range of less than 1,000
Megahertz(MGh) in which signals are received, and the Microwave Frequency is
greater than 1000 MGh. We will design and develop LNA's used for various
applications within the frequency range of DC to 100 GHz. RSL, Inc. will desiga
LNA's with both narrow and wide band applications. The LNA is vital to the performance of the respective transmit/receive
system because of its effectiveness to substantially increase the signal strength of
the transmit medium. By using a Low Cost method of reducing the noise that the
signal creates when it is amplified by the LNA, a stronger signal is produced and
carried through the receiver. The noise is created because constant motion of
electrons that is present in all molecules. Why the Low Noise Amplifier for noise reduction? There are
primarily three methods of reducing the Noise Level of the signal in transmit/receive
environments: <ul><li>Increase Transmit
Power</li><li></li><li> Reduce the Noise in the
Receiver </li></ul>In the first method we would
increase the transmit power to the receiver antenna. If we would double the
transmission power, the result would be less transmission path loss and the gain will
increase over the noise within the transmission path. This method will produce a
much higher cost as apposed to using an LNA at the receiver front end.
The second
method would be to increase the gain of the receiver antenna. This method would
also add a substantial increase in cost to the overall system. By utilizing an LNA at the receiver front end, we reduce the noise and
substantially increase the signal gain over the transmission path. This allows us to
use less transmission power, creating a better noise Performance and lower cost of
the overall system. This becomes the best alternative when comparing noise
performance, cost effectiveness of the overall system. Performance and Rating LNA's: The performance and the quality of the
Low Noise Amplifier - its ability to produce a higher signal by lowering its noise
level, substantially increases its value, and market price. RSL, Inc. will
enthusiastically and aggressively utilize its research and design experience of James
A. Cross to concentrate in a niche market of developing a product line of wide and
narrow band LNA's performing at or better than the existing products currently on
the market. This will provide higher margins and less
competition. THE MICROWAVE INDUSTRY Description: The microwave industry was born bach in 1886 because
of the historical experiment of a scientist named Henrick Hertz. Using what are
now called microwave Circuits and techniques, Hertz experimentally validated
James Maxwell's theory of Electromagnetism. Hertz went on to build a radio
frequency transmitter and receiver, a small Detector used to measure fields
inside a coaxial line, and a parabolic-reflector transmitter and receiver with which
Hertz demonstrated that electric waves at centimeter wavelengths have properties
similar to those of light waves. This began the
development of the revolutionary, high technological Microwave Industry. The
advent of the Microwave Industry expands into many dimensions and applications
of our present and future society, most common is the Telecommunications industry.
The use of Microwaves has given us a new understanding of the universe in which we live.
(Microwave Journal May '88 Pg. 44-47 Mario A. Maury, Jr. Maury Microwave Corp.,
Cucamonga CA). MAJOR SYSTEMS
UTILIZING MICROWAVE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS The following chart gives us a good foundation of where Microwaves are
used today, along with the applications: <ul><li>Communications (Cable, point-to-point, troposcatter,
satellite)</li><li></li><li> Military (weapon control, electronic warfare, Strategic
DefenseInitiative (SDI Program)</li><li> Navigation (satellite-based, ground, sea, and
air)</li><li></li><li>Energy (heating and cooking, power
transmission fusion)</li><li> Information </li></ul>As you
can see by the previous chart, Microwave technology supports many aspects of our
lives, at home, at work, and even when sick. (MICROWAVE JOURNAL September '88,
Anniversary Issue). Satellite Communications Industry:
This is one of the largest industries that will grow worldwide into a $20 Billion Dollar
a year business, and is expected to reach $35 Billion Dollars by the 21st century.
The industry is expected to rebound from its sluggish form of the mid 1980's, which
was the direct result of the development of lightwave technology and more
specifically fiber optics. However, this industry will continue to be a main source of
Low Noise Amplifiers. There are several trends in the
satellite telecommunications market that will breath new opportunities to the
industry. One is the growth of full-time international video channels. The number
of channels has grown from one to thirty-five, since 1984. High-definition television
(HDTV) is also expected to take off in the mid 1990's. This can especially be seen
with the recent publicity regarding Federal Grant Programs for research and
development in the HDTV. In addition, the videoconferencing market will show
extreme signs of penetration and growth in the 1990's. Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS) is another example of technology that is
finally starting to develop in the foreign marketplace. This specific market will be
especially attractive for our Ultra Low Noise Amplifiers. We will aggressively pursue
a share of this commercial market in order to establish a steady stream of revenues.
( For more details, see Market Plan) There are several indications of the growth in
this market. France is thought to be leading the way with the development of
ASTRA, TVSAT, AND TDE. Also are BSB, and Erinsat, and at least one Japanese
project. However, one must approach this market with caution because of the risk
associated with projects not subsidized by the respective
governments. Satellite
Telecommunications (Continued)The mobil satellite market is also extremely hot
right now. Supported by such satellites as INMARSAT, GEOSTAR, OMNINET, AND
LOCSTAR, a solid market will need to be established in order to give this market
some stability. The most demand will not pursue
the glamorous new services as described above, but rather seek the proven
technology of the Fixed Satellite Services. Internationally this market is expected to
grow 10% per year, along with the domestic market to be equally strong. To date 35
countries have purchased or leased domestic services from INTELSAT, a satellite
that we have launched into orbit. In the future, 24 more countries have obtained or
plan to launch their own separate domestic satellite systems. However, the satellite
industry must respect the development of fiber optic cables. This will create a
market thrust in the areas of Business networks, and private users. The Public users
will switch heavily toward the fiber optic networks. Over 50,000 miles of cable has
already been laid underground so far. The biggest improvements in the telecommunications industry are in the
area of digital communications compression techniques. Both telecommunications
and fiber optics are thought to be lagging in their development. Ground antenna
technology, particularly VSAT's and phased array antennas are also continuing to
improve performance while reducing costs. On-board processing and regeneration,
and cellular satellite antenna designs, if developed to potential, would have
tremendous impact on the dramatic satellite gains made possible by the mid
1990's,or later. The Japanese are becoming
aggressive in satellite communications, as seen in their pursuit of higher
frequencies, on-board processors, and the use of microterminals in their various
satellite projects. The dominance of the United States, held for nearly two decades,
will begin to give way to the Japanese and the Europeans. NEC of Japan will fight the
American strongholds of Hughes Network Systems, Scientific-Atlanta, and
Contel. Satellite communications of the 1990' swill be
marked by the rapidly developing technology of advanced digital compression
techniques, on-board switching and processing, phase array/flat antennas, and
satellite cellular antennas systems. Opportunities will be seen in the following
areas: <ul><li>New mobile and radio determination
satellite services</li><li> Expanding worldwide domestic satellite
market</li><li></li><li> Hot new business networks
market</li><li></li><li> Deregulation/by pass/private
satellite systems</li><li> Solid international satellite growth</li><li> New Video opportunities (digital
video and HDTV)</li><li> Thin route service at takeoff</li><li> New tele-health and tele-
education applications </li></ul>There
remains to be many old and new opportunities in the satellite telecommunications
industry. The space applications is enormous for microwave components, however,
it will remain a speculative environment. It is because of this, we will remain
cautious and conservative in penetrating any specific segments of this
industry. (MICROWAVE JOURNAL Feb 1989, Dr. Joseph N.
Pelton) 10 Channel Radio System Design
size="2">1. As discussed, we are enclosing
the datails of 10 channel and 30 channel (704 KBS and 2048 kb Digital Radio Systems)
required by us. 2. As discussed with you these
specifications are only a guideline and the actual product should have much better performance
than this. 3. In terms of environmental conditions, it
should work for -10 to +50'C 95% RH. 4. We will
prefer to have components of Motorola, Fujitsu, Mitsubishi to be used by you and we do not want
any proprietary components. 5. You can give
us the details for Duplexers used for single antenna as we have the same Duplexers in
production with us. 6. This equipment is required by
us in both bands, i.e. 350 to 500 Mhz and 600 to 700 Mhz. 7. We do
not know if you will be using SAW filter for the IF at 70 Mhz. If you are going to use, kindly let us
know the specifications as we will be in the position to help you in this
regard. 8. Regarding the baseband processing, i.e.
Trans base band processor (TBP) or receiver (RBP). If you can use DSP, it could reduce the
cost and
 that will be better or otherwise you can
plan ASIC at a rate for control purpose. <hr style="width: 100%;
height: 2px;"><div style="text-align: center;">SPECIFICATIONS FOR 10 CHANNEL
RADIO SYSTEM <div style="text-align: left;">Specs </div></div>1.3.5 The components shall be marked with their schematic
references so
that they are identifiable from the component layout diagram in the
 handbook. 1.3.6 The
equipment shall use min. number of proprietary components and a list of such components shall
be clearly indicated. Equipment using components which are
available from multiple sources will be preferable. 1.3.7 All controls,
switches, indicators etc., shall be clearly marked to show their circuit
designations and functions. 1.3.8 Each
terminal block and terminal shall be marked with an identifying
code. 1.3.9 Maintenance philosophy is to replace faulty
units after quick analysis of monitoring and alarm indications and built-in
test
equipment. The actual repair will be undertaken at suitable centralized repair centers.
The installation at site shall involve simple plug-in connections only. 1.3.10 The supervisory indications, built-in test equipment (BITE)
and other
control switches, should be provided at convenient height. The equipment shall have easy
access for servicing and maintenance. The repeater stations and in many cases terminal stations, may be kept
unattended. Hence, remote supervisory facility is to be
provided. All important switches/controls on the front panel
shall be provided with suitable safeguards such as interlock system to avoid
accidental operation by the maintenance personnel. The healthy condition of the units shall be displayed by green LED's,
unhealthy condition by red LED's and change of status by amber
indication. 1.3.11 1.3.12 1.3.13 1.3.14 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9
2.10 2.11 2.12 2.13 System Specifications Type of circuitry: Frequency
Range: 10 channel - Number of voice
channels: Voice coding: Data rate from and to MUX:
Interface towards MUX: Baseband interconnect
facility: Level/jitter tolerance: Bit Rate tolerance: Line Data
Rate: Type of Modulation: Modulation method: Type of
modulation: Solid
State a) 367.0 - 399.9 Mhz. b) 420.0 - 436.5 Mhz. 445.0 - 461.5 Mhz. c) 658.0 - 667.0 Mhz. 703.0 - 712.0 Mhz. 30 (Thirty) 64 kbps PCM 2.048 Mbps. - 704 Kbps. HDB-3. AS per CCITT G-703. Both 75 ohms
unbalanced and 120 ohms balanced options settable through strappings to be
style="font-family: Verdana;"> Regenerative
Repeater. As per CCITT G-
style="font-family: Verdana;"> +/- 50
PPm. To be specified by
supplier. QPSK, OQPSK or any
other modulation with specific
advantages, Modulation at RF or IF. Co-
herent. 2.14
2.15 Adjacent channel
spacing: TX-RX separation 2 Mhz. or less. a) 16.5 Mhz. in 367.0
Verdana;">band. b) 25.0 Mhz. in 420.0
size="2">c) 45.0 Mhz. in 658.0
size="2">399.9 Mhz, 461.5 Mhz, 662.0
Mhz, 2.16 Adjacent Channel D/U (for threshold
degradation of 2 dB): 0 dB. 2.17 2.19 Co Channel
D/U (for threshold degradation of 2 dB): Receiver IF Supervisory Channels: 20 dB. 70 Mhz. any other IF used
may be indicated. Supervisory
Channels for Omnibus orderwire and Remote supervision shall be provided. Express
order-wire and Telecomand channels are optional. 2.20 Orderwire 2.20.1
Type: 2.20.2
Band: 2.20.3 4W Trans/Receive
Level: 2.21 Type of operation:
(This type required only for 10 channel that is 704 KB. 30 channel at 2048 KBS 1+1
not standby) Monitoring with BITE: 2.22 Inservice Monitoring: Digital PCM/ADM 0.3 to 3.4 kHz.
with omnibus calling facility on buzzer and loudspeaker and speech on loudspeaker
and handset. Handset to be provided. -3 dBm
preferable. Single RF channel in (1 + 0)
configuration with redundancy in the form of duplicated power amplifier and power
supply. Built-in test equipment (BITE) for monitoring
parameters such as TX Power, Rec. RF level, Health of TLO/RLO, Primary voltages,
PSU voltages etc. should be provided. The details of parameters monitored may be
indicated. Monitoring sockets for
measurements with regular instruments shall be provided for parameters such as
TX 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Inservice Monitoring Continued
: TX power, TLO/RLO frequency,
PSU voltages Receive RF level etc. Actual parameters for which sockets are provided
may be indicated. Visual Alarm: Visual indication for parameters such as system
failure, power supply output failure, TX power low, TLO/RLO unhealthy condition,
quality
 deterioration (high BER/sinc. failure), no data output etc. to be
provided. The explanation of the alarms provided shall be
given. Audible alarm: Potential free contacts shall be provided for
extension of audible alarm. Reset facility for audible alarm shall be
style="font-family: Verdana;">Remote Supervision: The terminal station (controlling station) shall
monitor the status of the unattended repeater station and also the far end terminal
station ( controlled
station). The following parameters are to be monitored locally and conveyed to the
controlling station from each repeater and far end terminal
station. 1) RF path failure 2) Any sub-system failure 3) Two other
parameters related to the station. The details of
alarms provided may be indicated with diagnostic procedure. If grouping of alarms
is done for remote supervision, clear explanation should be
given. Number of HOPS - 4 nos. with drop insert ? of channels. Transmitter Specifications Trans Power at antenna port: + 30 dBm (min.) 50
ohms, + 35 dBm (max.). 3.4 Spurii and harmonic emission at antenna port: 25 microwatt
maximum. 3.5 Protection: Transmitter shall
be protected against infinate VSWR. 4.0 Receiver
size="2">4.1 Noise figure at antenna port: 4
dB or less. 4.2 RLO stability: +/~
style="font-family: Verdana;">4.3 IF frequency:70 Mhz . Any other IF used may
be specified. 4.4 3 dB IF bandwidth: The
supplier shall indicate actual bandwidth. 4.5 IF
impedance: 75 ohms. Return loss may be specified, 4.6 Reference RF level at antenna port: -63 dBm/50
ohms. 4.7 AGC range: From overload point to
threshold Linearised AGC voltage shall be available for
recording. 4.8 Image Frequency Rejection: 80
dB or better. 4.9 Receiver overload point
for no
deterioration of quality: -40 dBm or better. 4.10 Receiver
threshold in absence of interfering signal for BER of 1x10' -6: -89 dBm at antenna
port. 4.11 Operating range: From overload point to
threshold. 4.12 Squelch: To be
operated for quality deterioration (Sync, fail or BER of 1x10" -3) . Under squelch condition
AIC shall be transmitted towards MUX.
5.0
Specification for Branching Equipment 5.1 TX -
RX frequency spacing: As specified at si. No. 2.15 direction (TX port to Ant. port) : 2 dB max. 5.3 Insertion loss in receive direction (antenna port to RX port) : 2 dB
max. 5.4 TX-RX isolation: 80 dB or
better. 5.5 Return loss at antenna
port over 3
dB bandwidth of TX and RX frequencies: 20 dB or better. 5.6 Nominal impedance at Antenna port: 50 ohms. 5.7 Type of connector at ant. port: N-female 6.0 Power Supply Specifications 6.1 Input
D.C. voltage:-48V (-40v - -65v) 6.2 Input DC
voltage variation (limits) for operation of the system without degradation
in
performance: -40v to -60v. 6.3 ? ? to be
provided: Over voltage, short circuit, overload, under voltage and reverse
polarity. 6.4 Derived D.C. voltage: The number of
voltages used shall be minumum. Voltage distribution scheme to be
furnished. 6.5 Total Power Consumption:
45 watts (typical). Actual power consumption may be indicated by the
supplier. 7.0 Environmental Specifications
0 - +50 'C.
As per IPT-
1001A catagory B including vibration, bump, salinity and dust
test. 8.0 Transportation and Storage: -20 deg.C to 60
deg.C for storage. -40 deg.C to 60 deg.C for transport. 9.1 BER
Performance: Better than 1x10"-10 at threshold, 1x10"-10 from overload to 5 dB
above threshold level. 9.2 OrderWire The parameters shall be tested for
input D.C. voltage variation as specified in performance specifications.
BER
performance over simulated hop is to be established for no errors as specified in
para. 9.1. Co-channel and adjacent channel D/U measurements are to be carried
out at threshold with modulated undesired signal. Bit rate tolerance and
 jitter specs, of the system are to be established at threshold
receive level. 9.2.3 Noise
performance: 10.0
Maintainability: 11.0
Reliability: 12.0 Other requirements a) CCITT G.712 for Digital
PCM b) +/- 2dB or better with
respect to 1 Khz. tone at -20 dBm for ADM. c) +/-2 dB or better with respect to
1 Khz. tone
at -3dBm for analoq. d)2 dB or
better for PCM ??? e) -53
dbmop or better for digital f) -45 dbmop
or better for analog Type of construction practice may
be indicated with details of accessability for maintenance etc. The reliability prediction shall be worked out on the basis of guidelines
issued by Quality Assurance Wing of DOT video document No. QM
115. Better than 1,000,000 hours per Transreceiver
expected. </div>
MANAGEMENT CONSULTING CASE
<div style="text-align: center;">ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP,
Ltd. MANAGEMENT CONSULTING PERFORMANCE
ANALYSIS </div> PROJECT: Rescue Pflumm Contractors From Near
Bankruptcy PARAMETERS: 4 Year Tenure 1994 to
1998 



 INDICATORS


BEFORE &nbs
p; AFTER
 <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"> &nbsp
;

 Highest
Annual Sales: 
 $2,954,184
 $4,289,667 Sales Volume:


$10,785,000 $13,931,288 Sales Volume Increase:

 + $3,186,288 Highest
Annual Profit:
 $ 106,115
 $ 206,735 Net
Profits: 

 $ 24,998
 $ 451,706 Gross Profit Margin:

 23%

30% Corporate Equity Position:
 $ 11,308

$692,125 Dun & Bradstreet
Rating: CB3 - BB3
 BB1 - BA3 



 Poor
 Strong Assessment Surety Bonding Capacity: $1,500,000

$3,000,00+ PennDot
Prequalification: $1,000,000

$2,875,000 Banking Status: WatchDog
List Credit Worthy Employee Benefits:
 Section 125 


 Disability Income
Insurance 


 Dental Benefits 



 401K Plan 



Uniforms for all employees Goodwill:
 

 Company Logo 



Computer & MIS Systems 


 Professional
Image Strategic Planning:
 New Identity 


 Public Markets &
Contracts 


 Restore Good
Credit &
nbsp; &
nbsp;
 Restore Bond Rating

Advanced Media Group Website HTML November 8, 2009 ARCHIVED March 16, 2017

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Advanced Media Group Website HTML November 8, 2009 ARCHIVED March 16, 2017

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

WELCOME PAGE

<span style="font-family: Verdana;">Wednesday, October 14, 2009&nbsp; 3:43:14

<span style="font-family: Verdana;">Monday, October 19, 2009&nbsp; 4:39:59

<span style="font-family: Verdana;">Updated Monday, October 26, 2009&nbsp;

<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"><FONT style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"

<div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family:

<div style="text-align: justify;"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:

<p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana;"><span style="color:

<object width="340" height="285"><param name="movie"

<object width="340" height="285"><param name="movie"

<object width="340" height="285"><param name="movie"

<object width="340" height="285"><param name="movie"

<object width="340" height="285"><param name="movie"

<object width="340" height="285"><param name="movie"

<object width="340" height="285"><param name="movie"

<object width="340" height="285"><param name="movie"

<object width="340" height="285"><param name="movie"

<object width="340" height="285"><param name="movie"

<object width="340" height="285"><param name="movie"

<object width="340" height="285"><param name="movie"

<object width="340" height="285"><param name="movie"

<span style="font-family: Verdana;">Thursday, October 29, 2009&nbsp; 12:27:22

<span style="font-family: Verdana;">Thursday, October 29, 2009&nbsp; 12:27:22

<font size="3"><font size="1"><br><span style="font-family:

<P align=center>&nbsp;<FONT face=Verdana> <B><A title="Permanent Link:

<P align=justify><FONT face=Verdana>[5] CIA MORI ID 140401, pp. 6, 7. This is

<P align=justify><FONT face=Verdana>Fraud-busters such as Rep. Henry Waxman,

<span style="font-family: Verdana;">Updated Sunday, September 27, 2009&nbsp;

<ADDRESS><FONT face=Verdana>Wednesday, February 25, 2009&nbsp;9:09:32

<ADDRESS><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #88762f"

<P><FONT face=Verdana><STRONG><EM>The Dr. Phil show (Currently on NBC

<FONT face=Verdana><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #88762f"

<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"><FONT size=2><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT:

<DIV style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; TEXT-ALIGN: justify">

<div style="text-align: justify; font-family: Verdana;">Stan J Caterbone<br>Project

<div style="text-align: justify;"><div style="text-align: center; font-weight:

<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-FAMILY:

<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"><SPAN

<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-FAMILY:

<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify"><FONT size=2><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY:

<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"><FONT style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; TEXT-

<div style="text-align: justify;"><div style="text-align: center;"><font style="font-

<object width="340" height="285"><param name="movie"

<div style="text-align: justify;"><div style="text-align: center; font-family:

<div style="text-align: justify; font-family: Verdana;"><font size="2"><span

<div style="font-family: Verdana; text-align: justify;"><div style="text-align:

<div style="text-align: justify; font-family: Verdana;"><font size="2"><span

<div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">The following

<div style="text-align: justify;"><div style="text-align: center;"><font

<div style="font-weight: bold; text-align: center;"><font size="3"><span

<div style="text-align: center; font-family: Verdana;"><span style="font-weight:

<span style="font-family: Verdana;">To Visit The Citizens Commission on Human

<DIV style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify">

<div style="text-align: center; font-family: Verdana;"><font size="3"><span

<div style="text-align: center;"><font size="4"><span style="font-weight:

<div style="text-align: center;"><font style="text-decoration: underline;"

<p class="MsoBodyText" style="line-height: normal; font-family: Verdana;"><font

<p class="MsoBodyText" style="line-height: normal; font-family: Comic Sans

<p class="MsoBodyText" style="line-height: normal; font-family: Comic Sans

<p class="MsoBodyText" style="line-height: normal; font-family: Comic Sans

<p class="MsoNormal" style="background: white none repeat scroll 0%; margin-

<p class="MsoNormal" style="background: white none repeat scroll 0%; margin-

<p class="MsoNormal" style="background: white none repeat scroll 0%; margin-

<p class="MsoNormal" style="background: white none repeat scroll 0%; margin-

<span style="font-family: Verdana;">Wednesday, October 14, 2009 3:43:14

<span style="font-family: Verdana;">Monday, October 19, 2009 4:39:59

<span style="font-family: Verdana;">Updated Monday, October 26, 2009

<span style="font-family: Verdana;">Thursday, October 29, 2009 12:27:22

<span style="font-family: Verdana;">Thursday, October 29, 2009 12:27:22

<P align=center> <FONT face=Verdana> <B><A title="Permanent Link:

<span style="font-family: Verdana;">Updated Sunday, September 27, 2009

<ADDRESS><FONT face=Verdana>Wednesday, February 25, 2009 9:09:32