Faxed Merged Andrews SF-181

FAX COVER SHEET
To: Office of Management and Budget Fax: 1-202-395-3888
From: MAVIS ALICIA ANDREWS Fax: +31848835086
# of pages including cover sheet: 34
Date: 14th March 2017
Re: SF-181 Race & Ethnicity Form
Attached Documents:
SF-181
HJR 194
Motu Proprio
Popes Apology to the Americas
Popes Message of Peace
American Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
On Mutual Administrative Assistance in the Exchange of Information in Securities Matters and
The Establishment of a Framework for Consultations between the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission and the Ministry of Finance of The Netherlands
FAX COVER SHEET
To: SSA Office of International Affairs Fax: 1-877-385-0645
Attached Documents:
SF-181
HJR 194
Motu Proprio
U.S. Office of Personnel Management ETHNICITY AND RACE IDENTIFICATION
Guide to Personnel Data Standards (Please read the Privacy Act Statement and instructions before completing form.)
Name (Last, First, Middle Initial) Social Security Number Birthdate (Month and Year)
ANDREWS, MAVIS A. BSN: 184824916 06-1972

Agency Use Only
Privacy Act Statement
Ethnicity and race information is requested under the authority of 42 U.S.C. Section 2000e-16 and in compliance with
the Office of Management and Budget's 1997 Revisions to the Standards for the Classification of Federal Data on Race
and Ethnicity. Providing this information is voluntary and has no impact on your employment status, but in the instance
of missing information, your employing agency will attempt to identify your race and ethnicity by visual observation.
This information is used as necessary to plan for equal employment opportunity throughout the Federal government. It
is also used by the U. S. Office of Personnel Management or employing agency maintaining the records to locate
individuals for personnel research or survey response and in the production of summary descriptive statistics and
analytical studies in support of the function for which the records are collected and maintained, or for related workforce
studies.
Social Security Number (SSN) is requested under the authority of Executive Order 9397, which requires SSN be used
for the purpose of uniform, orderly administration of personnel records. Providing this information is voluntary and failure
to do so will have no effect on your employment status. If SSN is not provided, however, other agency sources may be
used to obtain it.
Specific Instructions: The two questions below are designed to identify your ethnicity and race. Regardless of your answer to
question 1, go to question 2.
Question 1. Are You Hispanic or Latino? (A person of Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central American, or other
Spanish culture or origin, regardless of race.)
U Yes U No
Question 2. Please select the racial category or categories with which you most closely identify by placing an X in the appropriate
box. Check as many as apply.
RACIAL CATEGORY
DEFINITION OF CATEGORY
(Check as many as apply)
U American Indian or Alaska Native A person having origins in any of the original peoples of North and South America
(including Central America), and who maintains tribal affiliation or community
attachment.
U Asian A person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast
Asia, or the Indian subcontinent including, for example, Cambodia, China, India,
Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand, and Vietnam.
U Black or African American A person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa.
U Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa, or
other Pacific Islands.
U White A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or
North Africa.
Standard Form 181

Revised August 2005
Previous editions not usable
42 U.S.C. Section 2000e-16
NSN 7540-01-099-3446
Print Form Save Form Clear Form

H. Res. 194
In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

July 29, 2008.
Whereas millions of Africans and their descendants were
enslaved in the United States and the 13 American colo-
nies from 1619 through 1865;
Whereas slavery in America resembled no other form of invol-
untary servitude known in history, as Africans were cap-
tured and sold at auction like inanimate objects or ani-
mals;
Whereas Africans forced into slavery were brutalized, humili-
ated, dehumanized, and subjected to the indignity of
being stripped of their names and heritage;
Whereas enslaved families were torn apart after having been
sold separately from one another;
Whereas the system of slavery and the visceral racism against
persons of African descent upon which it depended be-
came entrenched in the Nations social fabric;
Whereas slavery was not officially abolished until the passage
of the 13th Amendment to the United States Constitu-
tion in 1865 after the end of the Civil War;
Whereas after emancipation from 246 years of slavery, Afri-
can-Americans soon saw the fleeting political, social, and
economic gains they made during Reconstruction evis-
cerated by virulent racism, lynchings, disenfranchisement,
2
Black Codes, and racial segregation laws that imposed a
rigid system of officially sanctioned racial segregation in
virtually all areas of life;
Whereas the system of de jure racial segregation known as
Jim Crow, which arose in certain parts of the Nation
following the Civil War to create separate and unequal
societies for whites and African-Americans, was a direct
result of the racism against persons of African descent
engendered by slavery;
Whereas a century after the official end of slavery in Amer-
ica, Federal action was required during the 1960s to
eliminate the dejure and defacto system of Jim Crow
throughout parts of the Nation, though its vestiges still
linger to this day;
Whereas African-Americans continue to suffer from the com-
plex interplay between slavery and Jim Crowlong after
both systems were formally abolishedthrough enormous
damage and loss, both tangible and intangible, including
the loss of human dignity, the frustration of careers and
professional lives, and the long-term loss of income and
opportunity;
Whereas the story of the enslavement and de jure segregation
of African-Americans and the dehumanizing atrocities
committed against them should not be purged from or
minimized in the telling of American history;
Whereas on July 8, 2003, during a trip to Goree Island, Sen-
egal, a former slave port, President George W. Bush ac-
knowledged slaverys continuing legacy in American life
and the need to confront that legacy when he stated that
slavery was . . . one of the greatest crimes of history
. . . The racial bigotry fed by slavery did not end with
HRES 194 EH
3
slavery or with segregation. And many of the issues that
still trouble America have roots in the bitter experience
of other times. But however long the journey, our destiny
is set: liberty and justice for all.;
Whereas President Bill Clinton also acknowledged the deep-
seated problems caused by the continuing legacy of rac-
ism against African-Americans that began with slavery
when he initiated a national dialogue about race;
Whereas a genuine apology is an important and necessary
first step in the process of racial reconciliation;
Whereas an apology for centuries of brutal dehumanization
and injustices cannot erase the past, but confession of
the wrongs committed can speed racial healing and rec-
onciliation and help Americans confront the ghosts of
their past;
Whereas the legislature of the Commonwealth of Virginia has
recently taken the lead in adopting a resolution officially
expressing appropriate remorse for slavery and other
State legislatures have adopted or are considering similar
resolutions; and
Whereas it is important for this country, which legally recog-
nized slavery through its Constitution and its laws, to
make a formal apology for slavery and for its successor,
Jim Crow, so that it can move forward and seek rec-
onciliation, justice, and harmony for all of its citizens:
Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives
(1) acknowledges that slavery is incompatible with
the basic founding principles recognized in the Declara-
tion of Independence that all men are created equal;
HRES 194 EH
4
(2) acknowledges the fundamental injustice, cruelty,
brutality, and inhumanity of slavery and Jim Crow;
(3) apologizes to African Americans on behalf of the
people of the United States, for the wrongs committed
against them and their ancestors who suffered under
slavery and Jim Crow; and
(4) expresses its commitment to rectify the lin-
gering consequences of the misdeeds committed against
African Americans under slavery and Jim Crow and to
stop the occurrence of human rights violations in the fu-
ture.
Attest:
Clerk.
HRES 194 EH
The Holy See
APOSTOLIC LETTER
ISSUED MOTU PROPRIO
OF THE SUPREME PONTIFF

FRANCIS
ON THE JURISDICTION OF JUDICIAL AUTHORITIES OF VATICAN CITY STATE

IN CRIMINAL MATTERS
In our times, the common good is increasingly threatened by transnational organized crime, the
improper use of the markets and of the economy, as well as by terrorism.
It is therefore necessary for the international community to adopt adequate legal instruments to
prevent and counter criminal activities, by promoting international judicial cooperation on criminal
matters.
In ratifying numerous international conventions in these areas, and acting also on behalf of
Vatican City State, the Holy See has constantly maintained that such agreements are effective
means to prevent criminal activities that threaten human dignity, the common good and peace.
With a view to renewing the Apostolic Sees commitment to cooperate to these ends, by means of
this Apostolic Letter issued Motu Proprio, I establish that:
1. The competent Judicial Authorities of Vatican City State shall also exercise penal jurisdiction
over:
a) crimes committed against the security, the fundamental interests or the patrimony of the Holy
See;
2
b) crimes referred to:
- in Vatican City State Law No. VIII, of 11 July 2013, containing Supplementary Norms on Criminal
Law Matters;
- in Vatican City State Law No. IX, of 11 July 2013, containing Amendments to the Criminal Code
and the Criminal Procedure Code;
when such crimes are committed by the persons referred to in paragraph 3 below, in the exercise
of their functions;
c) any other crime whose prosecution is required by an international agreement ratified by the
Holy See, if the perpetrator is physically present in the territory of Vatican City State and has not
been extradited.
2. The crimes referred to in paragraph 1 are to be judged pursuant to the criminal law in force in
Vatican City State at the time of their commission, without prejudice to the general principles of the
legal system on the temporal application of criminal laws.
3. For the purposes of Vatican criminal law, the following persons are deemed public officials:
a) members, officials and personnel of the various organs of the Roman Curia and of the
Institutions connected to it.
b) papal legates and diplomatic personnel of the Holy See.
c) those persons who serve as representatives, managers or directors, as well as persons who
even de facto manage or exercise control over the entities directly dependent on the Holy See and
listed in the registry of canonical juridical persons kept by the Governorate of Vatican City State;
d) any other person holding an administrative or judicial mandate in the Holy See, permanent or
temporary, paid or unpaid, irrespective of that persons seniority.
4. The jurisdiction referred to in paragraph 1 comprises also the administrative liability of juridical
persons arising from crimes, as regulated by Vatican City State laws.
5. When the same matters are prosecuted in other States, the provisions in force in Vatican City
State on concurrent jurisdiction shall apply.
6. The content of article 23 of Law No. CXIX of 21 November 1987, which approves the Judicial
Order of Vatican City State remains in force.
This I decide and establish, anything to the contrary notwithstanding.
I establish that this Apostolic Letter issued Motu Proprio will be promulgated by its publication in
3
LOsservatore Romano, entering into force on 1 September 2013.
Given in Rome, at the Apostolic Palace, on 11 July 2013, the first of my Pontificate.
FRANCISCUS
Copyright - Libreria Editrice Vaticana

INDIGNOUPOPL
PopeFranciApologizetoIndigenou
PeopleforGraveinofColonialim
ICMNtaffJul10,2015
Inalandmarkpeech,PopeFranciapologizedonThurdaforthegraveinofcolonialimagaintIndigenou
PeopleofAmericainapeechtograrootgroupinolivia.
omemarightla,Whenthepopepeakofcolonialim,heoverlookcertainactionofthechurch,thePope
aid,accordingtoTheNewYorkTime.Iathitoouwithregret:Mangraveinwerecommittedagaintthe
NativepeopleofAmericainthenameofGod.
Hedidnttopthere.
Ihumlakforgivene,notonlfortheo eneofthechurchherelf,utaloforcrimecommittedagaintthe
nativepeopleduringtheo-calledconquetofAmerica,TheNewYorkTimereported.
Hepoketoacrowdofmorethan1,500attheWorldMeetingofPopularMovement,tandingide--idewith
olivianPreidentvoMorale,theAndeannation rtindigenoupreident.
AlthoughLatinAmericanchurchleaderhaveiuedapologieinthepat,thionewentfurtherandwamuch
moretargeted,theAociatedPrereported.PreviouapologiehadnoteendirectedatIndigenouPeopleofthe
America,APaid.
TheCatholicChurchwaoneofmanChritiandenominationthatranoardingchoolinCanadaandtheU..
deignedtokilltheIndianinthechildtakingkidfromtheirfamilie,cuttingthemo fromtheircultureand
educatingtheminthewaoftheuropean-mindedettler.TheCanadianTruthandReconciliationCommiion
onJune2cameoutwithareportcallinguchpracticeculturalgenocideandrecommendingthatPrimeMiniter
tephenHarperakthePopeforanapolog.ThoughHarpermetwithPopeFranciandmentionedthereport,he
didnotpeci callrequettheapolog,andthePonti wordinoliviadidnotreferencetheTRCdocument.
RLATD:PopeFranciandPrimeMinitertephenHarperTalkTruthandReconciliationatVatican
ManhavecalledforhimtooutrightrecindtheDoctrineofDicover,whichpavedthewaforcenturieof
oppreionagaintIndigenouPeople.
RLATD:NunUrgePopetoRecindDoctrineofDicover
ThePonti itouringouthAmericaforeightda,withtopincuador,oliviaandParagua.Hehacomeout
tronglagainttheenvironmentalravageandocialinjuticeofclimatechange,andinThurdapeechhe
continuedinthatvein,callingleaderwhodonotdefendMotherarthcoward.Healoaidtheare
committingagravein,APaid.
RLATD:PopeFranci:ProtectingMotherarthIOurDut,NotanOption
PopeFranci:IndigenouPeoplehouldethePrincipalDialoguePartneronProject
The Holy See
MESSAGE OF HIS HOLINESS

POPE FRANCIS
FOR THE CELEBRATION OF THE
WORLD DAY OF PEACE
1 JANUARY 2015
NO LONGER SLAVES, BUT BROTHERS AND SISTERS
1. At the beginning of this New Year, which we welcome as Gods gracious gift to all humanity, I
offer heartfelt wishes of peace to every man and woman, to all the worlds peoples and nations, to
heads of state and government, and to religious leaders. In doing so, I pray for an end to wars,
conflicts and the great suffering caused by human agency, by epidemics past and present, and by
the devastation wrought by natural disasters. I pray especially that, on the basis of our common
calling to cooperate with God and all people of good will for the advancement of harmony and
peace in the world, we may resist the temptation to act in a manner unworthy of our humanity.
In my Message for Peace last year, I spoke of the desire for a full life which includes a longing
for fraternity which draws us to fellowship with others and enables us to see them not as enemies
or rivals, but as brothers and sisters to be accepted and embraced.[1] Since we are by nature
relational beings, meant to find fulfilment through interpersonal relationships inspired by justice
and love, it is fundamental for our human development that our dignity, freedom and autonomy be
acknowledged and respected. Tragically, the growing scourge of mans exploitation by man
gravely damages the life of communion and our calling to forge interpersonal relations marked by
respect, justice and love. This abominable phenomenon, which leads to contempt for the
fundamental rights of others and to the suppression of their freedom and dignity, takes many
forms. I would like briefly to consider these, so that, in the light of Gods word, we can consider all
men and women no longer slaves, but brothers and sisters.
Listening to Gods plan for humanity

2
2. The theme I have chosen for this years message is drawn from Saint Pauls letter to Philemon,
in which the Apostle asks his co-worker to welcome Onesimus, formerly Philemons slave, now a
Christian and, therefore, according to Paul, worthy of being considered a brother. The Apostle of
the Gentiles writes: Perhaps this is why he was parted from you for a while, that you might have
him back for ever, no longer as a slave but more than a slave, as a beloved brother (vv. 15-16).
Onesimus became Philemons brother when he became a Christian. Conversion to Christ, the
beginning of a life lived Christian discipleship, thus constitutes a new birth (cf. 2 Cor 5:17; 1 Pet
1:3) which generates fraternity as the fundamental bond of family life and the basis of life in
society.
In the Book of Genesis (cf. 1:27-28), we read that God made man male and female, and blessed
them so that they could increase and multiply. He made Adam and Eve parents who, in response
to Gods command to be fruitful and multiply, brought about the first fraternity, that of Cain and
Abel. Cain and Abel were brothers because they came forth from the same womb. Consequently
they had the same origin, nature and dignity as their parents, who were created in the image and
likeness of God.
But fraternity also embraces variety and differences between brothers and sisters, even though
they are linked by birth and are of the same nature and dignity. As brothers and sisters, therefore,
all people are in relation with others, from whom they differ, but with whom they share the same
origin, nature and dignity. In this way, fraternity constitutes the network of relations essential for
the building of the human family created by God.
Tragically, between the first creation recounted in the Book of Genesis and the new birth in Christ
whereby believers become brothers and sisters of the first-born among many brethren (Rom
8:29), there is the negative reality of sin, which often disrupts human fraternity and constantly
disfigures the beauty and nobility of our being brothers and sisters in the one human family. It was
not only that Cain could not stand Abel; he killed him out of envy and, in so doing, committed the
first fratricide. Cains murder of Abel bears tragic witness to his radical rejection of their vocation
to be brothers. Their story (cf. Gen 4:1-16) brings out the difficult task to which all men and women
are called, to live as one, each taking care of the other.[2]
This was also the case with Noah and his children (cf. Gen 9:18-27). Hams disrespect for his
father Noah drove Noah to curse his insolent son and to bless the others, those who honoured
him. This created an inequality between brothers born of the same womb.
In the account of the origins of the human family, the sin of estrangement from God, from the
father figure and from the brother, becomes an expression of the refusal of communion. It gives
rise to a culture of enslavement (cf. Gen 9:25-27), with all its consequences extending from
generation to generation: rejection of others, their mistreatment, violations of their dignity and
fundamental rights, and institutionalized inequality. Hence, the need for constant conversion to the
3
Covenant, fulfilled by Jesus sacrifice on the cross, in the confidence that where sin increased,
grace abounded all the more through Jesus Christ (Rom 5:20-21). Christ, the beloved Son (cf.
Mt 3:17), came to reveal the Fathers love for humanity. Whoever hears the Gospel and responds
to the call to conversion becomes Jesus brother, sister and mother (Mt 12:50), and thus an
adopted son of his Father (cf. Eph 1:5).
One does not become a Christian, a child of the Father and a brother or sister in Christ, as the
result of an authoritative divine decree, without the exercise of personal freedom: in a word,
without being freely converted to Christ. Becoming a child of God is necessarily linked to
conversion: Repent, and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the
forgiveness of your sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit (Acts 2:38). All those who
responded in faith and with their lives to Peters preaching entered into the fraternity of the first
Christian community (cf. 1 Pet 2:17; Acts 1:15-16, 6:3, 15:23): Jews and Greeks, slaves and free
(cf. 1 Cor 12:13; Gal 3:28). Differing origins and social status did not diminish anyones dignity or
exclude anyone from belonging to the People of God. The Christian community is thus a place of
communion lived in the love shared among brothers and sisters (cf. Rom 12:10; 1 Thess 4:9; Heb
13:1; 1 Pet 1:22; 2 Pet 1:7).
All of this shows how the Good News of Jesus Christ, in whom God makes all things new (Rev
21:5),[3] is also capable of redeeming human relationships, including those between slaves and
masters, by shedding light on what both have in common: adoptive sonship and the bond of
brotherhood in Christ. Jesus himself said to his disciples: No longer do I call you servants, for the
servant does not know what his master is doing; but I have called you friends, for all that I have
heard from my Father I have made known to you (Jn 15:15).
The many faces of slavery yesterday and today
3. From time immemorial, different societies have known the phenomenon of mans subjugation by
man. There have been periods of human history in which the institution of slavery was generally
accepted and regulated by law. This legislation dictated who was born free and who was born into
slavery, as well as the conditions whereby a freeborn person could lose his or her freedom or
regain it. In other words, the law itself admitted that some people were able or required to be
considered the property of other people, at their free disposition. A slave could be bought and
sold, given away or acquired, as if he or she were a commercial product.
Today, as the result of a growth in our awareness, slavery, seen as a crime against humanity,[4]
has been formally abolished throughout the world. The right of each person not to be kept in a
state of slavery or servitude has been recognized in international law as inviolable.
Yet, even though the international community has adopted numerous agreements aimed at ending
slavery in all its forms, and has launched various strategies to combat this phenomenon, millions
4
of people today children, women and men of all ages are deprived of freedom and are forced
to live in conditions akin to slavery.
I think of the many men and women labourers, including minors, subjugated in different sectors,
whether formally or informally, in domestic or agricultural workplaces, or in the manufacturing or
mining industry; whether in countries where labour regulations fail to comply with international
norms and minimum standards, or, equally illegally, in countries which lack legal protection for
workers rights.
I think also of the living conditions of many migrants who, in their dramatic odyssey, experience
hunger, are deprived of freedom, robbed of their possessions, or undergo physical and sexual
abuse. In a particular way, I think of those among them who, upon arriving at their destination after
a gruelling journey marked by fear and insecurity, are detained in at times inhumane conditions. I
think of those among them, who for different social, political and economic reasons, are forced to
live clandestinely. My thoughts also turn to those who, in order to remain within the law, agree to
disgraceful living and working conditions, especially in those cases where the laws of a nation
create or permit a structural dependency of migrant workers on their employers, as, for example,
when the legality of their residency is made dependent on their labour contract. Yes, I am thinking
of slave labour.
I think also of persons forced into prostitution, many of whom are minors, as well as male and
female sex slaves. I think of women forced into marriage, those sold for arranged marriages and
those bequeathed to relatives of their deceased husbands, without any right to give or withhold
their consent.
Nor can I fail to think of all those persons, minors and adults alike, who are made objects of
trafficking for the sale of organs, for recruitment as soldiers, for begging, for illegal activities such
as the production and sale of narcotics, or for disguised forms of cross-border adoption.
Finally, I think of all those kidnapped and held captive by terrorist groups, subjected to their
purposes as combatants, or, above all in the case of young girls and women, to be used as sex
slaves. Many of these disappear, while others are sold several times over, tortured, mutilated or
killed.
Some deeper causes of slavery
4. Today, as in the past, slavery is rooted in a notion of the human person which allows him or her
to be treated as an object. Whenever sin corrupts the human heart and distances us from our
Creator and our neighbours, the latter are no longer regarded as beings of equal dignity, as
brothers or sisters sharing a common humanity, but rather as objects. Whether by coercion or
deception, or by physical or psychological duress, human persons created in the image and
5
likeness of God are deprived of their freedom, sold and reduced to being the property of others.
They are treated as means to an end.
Alongside this deeper cause the rejection of another persons humanity there are other causes
which help to explain contemporary forms of slavery. Among these, I think in the first place of
poverty, underdevelopment and exclusion, especially when combined with a lack of access to
education or scarce, even non-existent, employment opportunities. Not infrequently, the victims of
human trafficking and slavery are people who look for a way out of a situation of extreme poverty;
taken in by false promises of employment, they often end up in the hands of criminal networks
which organize human trafficking. These networks are skilled in using modern means of
communication as a way of luring young men and women in various parts of the world.
Another cause of slavery is corruption on the part of people willing to do anything for financial gain.
Slave labour and human trafficking often require the complicity of intermediaries, be they law
enforcement personnel, state officials, or civil and military institutions. This occurs when money,
and not the human person, is at the centre of an economic system. Yes, the person, made in the
image of God and charged with dominion over all creation, must be at the centre of every social or
economic system. When the person is replaced by mammon, a subversion of values occurs.[5]
Further causes of slavery include armed conflicts, violence, criminal activity and terrorism. Many
people are kidnapped in order to be sold, enlisted as combatants, or sexually exploited, while
others are forced to emigrate, leaving everything behind: their country, home, property, and even
members of their family. They are driven to seek an alternative to these terrible conditions even at
the risk of their personal dignity and their very lives; they risk being drawn into that vicious circle
which makes them prey to misery, corruption and their baneful consequences.
A shared commitment to ending slavery
5. Often, when considering the reality of human trafficking, illegal trafficking of migrants and other
acknowledged or unacknowledged forms of slavery, one has the impression that they occur within
a context of general indifference.
Sadly, this is largely true. Yet I would like to mention the enormous and often silent efforts which
have been made for many years by religious congregations, especially womens congregations, to
provide support to victims. These institutes work in very difficult situations, dominated at times by
violence, as they work to break the invisible chains binding victims to traffickers and exploiters.
Those chains are made up of a series of links, each composed of clever psychological ploys which
make the victims dependent on their exploiters. This is accomplished by blackmail and threats
made against them and their loved ones, but also by concrete acts such as the confiscation of
their identity documents and physical violence. The activity of religious congregations is carried
out in three main areas: in offering assistance to victims, in working for their psychological and
6
educational rehabilitation, and in efforts to reintegrate them into the society where they live or from
which they have come.
This immense task, which calls for courage, patience and perseverance, deserves the
appreciation of the whole Church and society. Yet, of itself, it is not sufficient to end the scourge of
the exploitation of human persons. There is also need for a threefold commitment on the
institutional level: to prevention, to victim protection and to the legal prosecution of perpetrators.
Moreover, since criminal organizations employ global networks to achieve their goals, efforts to
eliminate this phenomenon also demand a common and, indeed, a global effort on the part of
various sectors of society.
States must ensure that their own legislation truly respects the dignity of the human person in the
areas of migration, employment, adoption, the movement of businesses offshore and the sale of
items produced by slave labour. There is a need for just laws which are centred on the human
person, uphold fundamental rights and restore those rights when they have been violated. Such
laws should also provide for the rehabilitation of victims, ensure their personal safety, and include
effective means of enforcement which leave no room for corruption or impunity. The role of women
in society must also be recognized, not least through initiatives in the sectors of culture and social
communications.
Intergovernmental organizations, in keeping with the principle of subsidiarity, are called to

coordinate initiatives for combating the transnational networks of organized crime which oversee
the trafficking of persons and the illegal trafficking of migrants. Cooperation is clearly needed at a
number of levels, involving national and international institutions, agencies of civil society and the
world of finance.
Businesses[6] have a duty to ensure dignified working conditions and adequate salaries for their
employees, but they must also be vigilant that forms of subjugation or human trafficking do not find
their way into the distribution chain. Together with the social responsibility of businesses, there is
also the social responsibility of consumers. Every person ought to have the awareness that
purchasing is always a moral and not simply an economic act.[7]
Organizations in civil society, for their part, have the task of awakening consciences and
promoting whatever steps are necessary for combating and uprooting the culture of enslavement.
In recent years, the Holy See, attentive to the pain of the victims of trafficking and the voice of the
religious congregations which assist them on their path to freedom, has increased its appeals to
the international community for cooperation and collaboration between different agencies in
putting an end to this scourge.[8] Meetings have also been organized to draw attention to the
phenomenon of human trafficking and to facilitate cooperation between various agencies,
including experts from the universities and international organizations, police forces from migrants
7
countries of origin, transit, or destination, and representatives of ecclesial groups which work with
victims. It is my hope that these efforts will continue to expand in years to come.
Globalizing fraternity, not slavery or indifference
6. In her proclamation of the truth of Christs love in society,[9] the Church constantly engages in
charitable activities inspired by the truth of the human person. She is charged with showing to all
the path to conversion, which enables us to change the way we see our neighbours, to recognize
in every other person a brother or sister in our human family, and to acknowledge his or her
intrinsic dignity in truth and freedom. This can be clearly seen from the story of Josephine Bakhita,
the saint originally from the Darfur region in Sudan who was kidnapped by slave-traffickers and
sold to brutal masters when she was nine years old. Subsequently as a result of painful
experiences she became a free daughter of God thanks to her faith, lived in religious
consecration and in service to others, especially the most lowly and helpless. This saint, who lived
at the turn of the twentieth century, is even today an exemplary witness of hope[10] for the many
victims of slavery; she can support the efforts of all those committed to fighting against this open
wound on the body of contemporary society, a scourge upon the body of Christ. [11]
In the light of all this, I invite everyone, in accordance with his or her specific role and
responsibilities, to practice acts of fraternity towards those kept in a state of enslavement. Let us
ask ourselves, as individuals and as communities, whether we feel challenged when, in our daily
lives, we meet or deal with persons who could be victims of human trafficking, or when we are
tempted to select items which may well have been produced by exploiting others. Some of us, out
of indifference, or financial reasons, or because we are caught up in our daily concerns, close our
eyes to this. Others, however, decide to do something about it, to join civic associations or to
practice small, everyday gestures which have so much merit! such as offering a kind word, a
greeting or a smile. These cost us nothing but they can offer hope, open doors, and change the
life of another person who lives clandestinely; they can also change our own lives with respect to
this reality.
We ought to recognize that we are facing a global phenomenon which exceeds the competence of
any one community or country. In order to eliminate it, we need a mobilization comparable in size
to that of the phenomenon itself. For this reason I urgently appeal to all men and women of good
will, and all those near or far, including the highest levels of civil institutions, who witness the
scourge of contemporary slavery, not to become accomplices to this evil, not to turn away from the
sufferings of our brothers and sisters, our fellow human beings, who are deprived of their freedom
and dignity. Instead, may we have the courage to touch the suffering flesh of Christ,[12] revealed
in the faces of those countless persons whom he calls the least of these my brethren (Mt 25:40,
45).
We know that God will ask each of us: What did you do for your brother? (cf. Gen 4:9-10). The
8
globalization of indifference, which today burdens the lives of so many of our brothers and sisters,
requires all of us to forge a new worldwide solidarity and fraternity capable of giving them new
hope and helping them to advance with courage amid the problems of our time and the new
horizons which they disclose and which God places in our hands.
From the Vatican, 8 December 2014
FRANCISCUS
[1] No. 1.
[2] Message for the 2014 World Day of Peace, 2.
[3] Cf. Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Gaudium, 11.
[4] Cf. Address to Delegates of the International Association of Penal Law, 23 October 2014:
LOsservatore Romano, 24 October 2014, p. 4.
[5] Address to Participants in the World Meeting of Popular Movements, 28 October 2014:
[6] Cf. PONTIFICAL COUNCIL FOR JUSTICE AND PEACE, Vocation of the Business Leader: A
Reflection, 2013.
[7] BENEDICT XVI, Encyclical Letter Caritas in Veritate, 66.
[8] Cf. Message to Mr Guy Ryder, Director General of the International Labour Organization, on
the occasion of the 103rd Session of the ILO, 22 May 2014: LOsservatore Romano, 29 May 2014,
p. 7.
[10] Through the knowledge of this hope she was redeemed, no longer a slave, but a free child
of God. She understood what Paul meant when he reminded the Ephesians that previously they
were without hope and without God in the world without hope because without God (BENEDICT
XVI, Encyclical Letter Spe Salvi, 3).
[11] Address to Participants in the Second International Conference on Combating Human

Trafficking: Church and Law Enforcement in Partnership, 10 April 2014: LOsservatore Romano,
11 April 2014, p. 7; cf. Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Gaudium, 270.
9
[12] Cf. Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Gaudium, 24 and 270.

- 167 -
AG/RES. 2888 (XLVI-O/16)
AMERICAN DECLARATION ON THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES
(Adopted at the third plenary session, held on June 15, 2016)
THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY,
RECALLING the contents of resolution AG/RES. 2867 (XLIV-O/14), Draft American

Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, as well as all the previous resolutions on this issue;
RECALLING also the Declaration on the Rights of the Indigenous Peoples in the
Americas, document AG/DEC. 79 (XLIV-O/14), which reaffirms that progress in promoting and
effectively protecting the rights of the indigenous peoples of the Americas is a priority for the
Organization of American States;
RECOGNIZING the valuable support provided by the member states, observer states, the
organs, agencies, and entities of the Organization of American States for the process within the
Working Group to Prepare the Draft American Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples;
RECOGNIZING as well the important participation of indigenous peoples of the Americas in

the process of preparing this Declaration; and
TAKING INTO ACCOUNT the significant contribution that the indigenous peoples of the
Americas have made to humanity,
RESOLVES:
To adopt the following Draft American Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.1/, 2/
1. The United States remains committed to addressing the urgent issues of concern to indigenous peoples
across the Americas, including combating societal discrimination against indigenous peoples and
2. Canada reiterates its commitment to a renewed relationship with its Indigenous peoples, based on
recognition of rights, respect, co-operation and partnership. Canada is now fully engaged, ...
AGREEMENT
The United States of America The Kingdom of the Netherlands
On Mutual Administrative
Assistance in the Exchange of
Information in Securities Matters
The Hague
December 11, 1989
ACRBEltENT BETWEEN M E UNITED STATES OF uceRlCA AND THE KINCMIH
OF THE NETHERLMIDS ON HUlWAL ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANCE

IN THE EXCHANGE OF IAPOMATION IN SECURITlES MATTERS
The Coverament of the united States of America md the Goverrmenc of
the Kingdom of the Netherlands;
CONSIDERIBC that the development of the internationalization of trading
in securities requires.increasing exchange of information between the
supervisory authorities;
MVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
AUTICLE 1 - DEFINITIONS
1. For the purpose of this Agreement:
a. the t e n 'Compctenc Authority' means:
- Por the United States of lurerica, the United States Securities

and Exchange Commission ('Cmission') or the Cmission's
designee and other authorities designated by the United States
Goverrmenc.
- Por the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Minister of Finance or

the ilinister's designee.
b. the term 'securities business' means the business of:
- effecting transactions in securities for the accounts of

others;
- w i n g and selling securities for one's o m accomt;

- advising others, for capenration, either directly or throqh
-
publications or listings. as to the value of securiries or as
to the desirability of inverting in, purchasing or selling
securities:
- acting as an interndiary ID making payments or deliveries or

both in connection With transactions in securities or providing
facilities for comparison of data representing the terms of

setclement of securities transactioas;
- angaging on behalf of an issuer of securities in matters

relsting to the issuance, registration, exchange and transfer
of such securities:
- the muagement, prolotion, offer or sale of any i n r e s ~ e n t

'capany or collective inveatmeat scheme; or
- equivalent sctivities conducted by persons or entitiem.
c. the term 'securities exchange' means a market. including en over-
thccounter-market, for shares, bonds. opttons and other
securities which is recognized, regulated or supervised by the
Competent Authorities.
2. For the purpose of chis Agreement. the terms herein shall be deemed
to be defined in accordance with rhr relevant laws of the
jurisdiction of the Cwpetent Authority of rhc Requesting State.
ARTICLE 2 - SCOPE OF ASSISTANCE

1. Each Competent Authority undertakes, in accordance with the
provisions of this &reew.nc, to provide rhe Competent Authority of
the other Contracting Party with the greatest possible measure of
mutual administrative assistance in obtaining a d exchanging
information relating to the administration and enforcement of the
other's securities l a m and re~ulations.
2. The assistance available under this Agreement includes but is not
limited to:
a. obtaining aid providing information and docmenrs by the
CcmpeCent Autbority Of the Requested State;
b. taking statenents of persons by the Competent Authority of the
Requestad State; and
c. conducting coapliance inspections or examinations of securities
businesses by the Compermt Authority of the Requested State.
3. In particular, each Competent Authority shall give assistance to the
other Competent Authority in obtaining and exchanging information
that is relevant to the lam and regulations of the requesting
Colpetent Authority concerning:
a. the granting of licences, waivers or exemptions for the conduct
of securities business;
b. the observance of the laws and regulations applicable to
securities business;
c. the observance of the lass and regulations applicable to
secoritiu exchanges;
d. the obm-e of the regulations of securities excbnges by

their &rr;
e. the observance of the laws and regulations applicable to any
issuer of securities, or persons related, directly or indirectly,
to such issuer, required to comply with any requirement regarding
the disclosure of inlormation; and
f. the prevention and detection of securities fraud and other

irregularities in connection vith the offer, purchase or sale of
any security.
ARTICLE 3 - CENEIUL PRINCIPLES
1. All requests for infomation or assistance pursuant to this

Agreement shall be made and executed through a Coapetenr Authority
for each Contracting Parcy. The Competent Authorities of the
Contracting Parties shall ccaunicate directly with each other for
the pvrpoae of carrying out the provisions of this Agreement.
Wocwithrcanding these principles:
a. each Competmt Authority may communicate from its o m territory
vith any person in zhe territory of the other Contracting Parry
who voluntarily agrees to provide the information or documents
requested; and
b. requests by a Competent Authority for information that is
available from m y public source in the territory of the other
Contracting Party may be colnunicated on an informal basis
vithouc compliance with the terms of this Agreement.
2; The provisions of this Agreement vill not give rise to a right.

directly or indirectly, on the part of any person other than the
Competent Authorities. to obtain, suppress or exclude any
information or to challenge the execution of a request for
assistance under this Agreement, richout prejudice to the
constitutional law of the Contracting Parties.
3- The Competent Authority of the Requested State may refuse to comply

with a request for assistance on the grounds that:
a. such compliance would prejudice the security or other essential
pllblic interests of the Bequeeted State; or
b. much cmplimcce would interfere vith an ongoiog investisation

being conducted by the Bequented State.
ARTICLE 4 - W3QUESTS POR ASSISTANCE

1. Bequests for assietance shall be mada in vriting and shall be
reasoned. Requasts shall be addressed to the contact officers,
designated by thc Competent Authorities.
2. Raquests shall specify:
a. the information which is sought; the persons or entities which
may be in possession of the information and the place *era the

inforution may be available;
h. a general description of the matter which is the subject of the
request and the purpose for which'the inforution is sought;
C. the reason for requesting the information;
d. the legal provisions relating to the matter; and
e. the desired time period for the reply and, in cases of urgency.
the justification therefor.
3. In the event of urgency, requests for assistance and replies may be
effected by sammari procedures or by means of communication other
than the exchange of written information, provided that a11
c ~ d c a t i o n sare confirmed in the manner prescribed in this
Article.
ARTICLE 5 - EXECUTION OF SeQUESTS

1. The Competent Authority of the Requested State shall deal with the
request for assistance within a reasonable period.
2. Requests shall be executed in accordance with the laws and

procedures of the Bequested State.
3. The Competent Authority of the Requested State shall obtain the
information requested by the Competent Authority of the Requemting
State. The inforution shall he obtained in conformance with
paragraph 2 and, in so far as it is reasonably possible to do so, in
the form and p r s w t to the procedures 'desired by ttut Authority.
including requlriq e t s t e m t s of persons.
,..
..
6 . The Competent Authority of the Requested State shall, upon request,
in SO far as it is reaeonably necesrary to do so, conduct
ex.nirutions of the books and records of a securities business or
its custodian or agent.
5. At the time a request is being executed, the Competent Authority of
the Requested State may perpic the presence of persons designated by
tbe Competent Authority of the Requesting State. Those designated
persons shall be allowed to formulate questions to ba asked at the
execution of the request.
ARTICLE 6 - PERMISSIBLE USE OF INFOPJUTION
The Competent Authority of the Reqursting State u y use the information
supplied only for the use indicated in its request.
a. With respect to the use of information in criminal proceedings,
prior approval of the Competent Authority of the Requested Stare
shall be obtained;
b. With respect to all other uses of information, the Competent
Authority of the Raquesting State must inform the Competent
Authority of the Requested State before wing the infoIUaCion
supplied for reasons other than thoee indicated in its initial
request. The Corpetent Authority of the Requected Stare may oppose
such other use only in cases where such use w u l d not be in the
interest of the administration and cnforcslrcnt of securities laus
and regulations or when the circumstances mntioned in paragraph 3
of Article 3 are applicable. Unless such opporiclon is u d e within
fourteen days of the receipt of the aotiflcation of the intended use
of the h p e t e n t Authority of the Requesting State, the infomation
u y be w e d in the manner spacified in the notificacim.
ARTICLE 7 - CONPIDEUIIYIN
1. Except aa contemplated in Article 6, each Competent Authority will
.? maintain the secrecy, to the exteat pedtted by irv, of the request

$f. for usietance. the -eat parts of the request and the
,.
i.5
inforution gathered and provided pursuant to the request. Such
secrecy u y be waived. to the extent permitted by law.. by the mutual
agreement of the Competent Authorities of the Requesting and the
Requested States.
2. m e n the Requesting Competent Authority has terminated the matter
for vhich assistance has been requested under this Agreement, upon
request of the Requested Competent Authority, it will return to the
Requested Competent Authority, to the extent pemitted by law, a11
documents and copies thereof and other material disclosing the
contents of such documents not already disclosed in proceedings
referred to in Article 6, or pursuant to paragraph 1 of this
Article, other than naterial vhich is generated as part of the
delSberative or internal analytical process of the Requesting
Cmpetenc Authority.
1. Mutual cooperation in criminal rsttars betwen the Contracting
Parties shall continue to be governed exclusively by the Treaty
be- the United States of America and the Kingdom of the
Uetbtrlands on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Hatters of June 12,
1981.
2. R i o r approval by the Cmpetent Authority of the Requested Stare is
required for tbe use in a crfminal proceeding of informattoo that
pcevlously has been exchanged nuder this Agreement.
ARTICLE 9 - cuss
1. If it appears that respondins to an individual request for
assistance under this Agreement will involve substantial costs bein8
incurred by the Competent Authority of the Requested State, tbe
Competent Authorities of both States shall establish a cost sharing
arran?.ement before further effecting the request for assistance.
2. If, in general, the execution of this Agreement leads to costs being

incurred mainly and substantially by one of the Competent
Authorities, the Competent AULhoritie~ of the Contracting Parties
concerned shall conclude a general cost sharing srrangement.
ARTICLE 10 - CONSULTATION
1. m e Competent Authorities will engage in consultrcions with respect
to this Agreement with a view co improving its operation and to
resolving any matters which may arise. In particular, the Wmpetent
Authorities will consult upon request in the event of:
a. a refusal by one Competent Authority to comply with a request for

information on the grounds set forth in paragraph 3 of Article 3 ;
or
b. a change in market or business conditions, or in the legisl~tion

governing the matters set forth is paragraph 3 of Article 2; or
c. any other difficulty which makes it necessary or appropriate co
m e n d or extend this Agreement in order to achieve its purposes
2. Ihe Competent Authorities may agree on such practical measures as
may be necessary to facilitate the implementation of this
Agrceaeut.
ARTICLE 11 - ENTRY I W PORCE
This Agreement shall enter into force on the firat day of the second
month folloving the date on vhich both the Contrecting Parties have
informed each other in yriting that the procedures constitutionally
required therefor in. their respective countries have been caplied
with.
With 'kgard to the g i l y d a of the IPctherlands this Agreemeat ahall

, apply to the territory of the lingdo. of the tzetherlands in X o p e .
ARTICLE 13 - ll3Xt4IUATION
1. Any Cootracting Party u y at any time denounce this Agreement by
.aam of ootificatiou to the other Party.
2. Such denuuclation shall become effective six months after the
receipt of the uotific8tion. If my Contracting Party gives such

notice, this A g r c m n t will wntinue to have effect with respect to
all requests for assistance u d e before the effective date of such

notification until the h p e t m t Authority of the Requesting S u t e
cmcludes the u t t e r for which assistance vrs requested.
IN U I U W S UE!dIBOF, the t~C~darsipled,

being duly authorized to that
etfct, b v e signed this & c e w n f .
DOltE in duplicate at ' h e B y u e this eleventh day of December 1989 in

the English. l.ngua8e.
For the Gme-t of the For the Dore-t of the
United States of America. KiDgdom of the Netherl8nds.

COMMUNIQUE
The United States The ffingdom of the

Securities and Exchange Commission Netherlands
REGARDING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND
THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS ON
MUTUAL ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANCE IN
THE EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION IN SECURITIES MATTERS
AND
THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A FRAMEWORK
FOR CONSULTATIONS BETWEEN
THE UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION AND
THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE OF THE NETHERLANDS
Washington, D.C./The Hague

July 1, 1992
COW4UNIQUE REGARDING TRE IXPLFNENTATION OF THE
THE KINGDOM OF THE ON
MU!RlAL ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANCE IN

THE EXCHANGE OF INWRMATION IN SECURITIES MATTERS
AND
TEE UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION AND

THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE OF THE NETIIERLANDS
In recognition of the need for cooperation in matters relating to
the enforcement and aclministration of the securities laws of our
respective nations, the United States Securities and Exchqnge
Commission (mSECn) and the Ministry of Finance of the Kingaom of ' -

The Netherlands signed an Agreement on Mutual Administrative
Assistance on December 11, 1989 ("Agreementm). On May 19 and May
22, 1992, pmsuant to Article 11 of the Agreement, the Parties
made the necessary notifications that the procedures
constitutionally required for the entry into force of the Agreement
in the United States and the Kingdom of The Netherlands have been
complied with. The Agreement will enter into force on July 1,
1992.
11. BSTA3LiEEMZWP OF FRAMEWORK FOR CONEOLTATXOXE

This Communique further confirms the mutual understanding of the
Parties that, given the interconnection and interdependence of the
United States and Dutch securities markets, it is essential to
establish a framework for enhancing communication between the SEC

and the securities authorities of the Kingdom of The Netherlands -

the Minister of Finance, the Securities Board of the Netherlands

and, for collective investment schemes, the Dutch Central Bank
about all securities matters that fall within their
-
responsibilities.
The SEC and the Ministry of Finance are committed to the
development of open, fair, transparent and efficient markets, and
to addressing the concerns raised by market volatility.
Transactions in stocks and bonds in the Netherlands attributable
to the United States increased from $ 4.8 billion in 1985 to $ 14.9

billion in 1991. Transactions in stocks and bonds in the United
States attributable to the Netherlands increased from $ 5.3 billion

in 1985 to $ 10.8 billion in 1991. The SEC and the Ministry of
Finance believe that these increased flows of capital are positive
and represent a benefit for both nations1 economies generally. The
Parties recognize that cooperation and consultation between the SEC
and the Ministry of Finance will create the balance between market
oversight and market development and competition that is critical
to the continued evolution of their domestic markets.
This Communique confirms the mutual intention of the Parties to
engage in consultations about subjects of mutual interest in order
to protect investors by ensuring the efficiency and integrity of
the securities markets of the United States and the Kingdom of The
Netherlands, the enhancement of market oversight, and the
administration of both United States and Dutch securities laws.
These consultations will assist in the development of mutually
agreeable approaches for strengthening the securities markets of
the United States and the Kingdom of The Netherlands, and will help
avoid conflicts that may arise from the application of differing
regulatory ,practices.
Signed this 1st day of July, 1992, at Washington, D.C., United
States of America; and The Hague, The Kingdom of The Netherlands.
h
-. - - -
'~~LQc
R chard C. Breeden
Chairman
Wim Kok
Minister of Finance
The Kingdom of The
Securities and Exchange
Commission Netherlands
United States of America
FAX COVER SHEET

ON BEHALF OF: R.J.S. Andrews
Attached Documents:
SF-181
HJR 194
Motu Proprio
FAX COVER SHEET

ON BEHALF OF: R.J.S. Andrews
Attached Documents:
SF-181
HJR 194
Motu Proprio
ANDREWS, RAFAEL J.S. BSN: 607668210 08-2011

Agency Use Only
studies.
used to obtain it.
U Yes U No
RACIAL CATEGORY
attachment.
North Africa.
Standard Form 181

Revised August 2005
NSN 7540-01-099-3446
H. Res. 194

July 29, 2008.
mals;
2
linger to this day;
opportunity;
HRES 194 EH
3
their past;
resolutions; and
HRES 194 EH
4
ture.
Attest:
Clerk.
HRES 194 EH
The Holy See
APOSTOLIC LETTER
ISSUED MOTU PROPRIO

FRANCIS

IN CRIMINAL MATTERS
matters.
over:
See;
2
Law Matters;
of their functions;
been extradited.
3
FRANCISCUS

INDIGNOUPOPL
ICMNtaffJul10,2015
Hedidnttopthere.
America,APaid.
The Holy See

POPE FRANCIS
WORLD DAY OF PEACE
1 JANUARY 2015

2
society.
likeness of God.
3
13:1; 1 Pet 1:22; 2 Pet 1:7).
4
workers rights.
of slave labour.
their consent.
killed.
5
6
communications.

world of finance.
7
this reality.
45).
8
FRANCISCUS
[1] No. 1.
Reflection, 2013.
p. 7.

9

- 167 -


RESOLVES:
AGREEMENT
The Hague
December 11, 1989


Goverrmenc.


others;

-
securities:



of such securities:


limited to:

their &rr;

any security.

requested; and





Article.


,..
..
shall be obtained;

,.
i.5
Requested States.
Cmpetenc Authority.
1981.
ARTICLE 9 - cuss


or

Agrceaeut.
with.






COMMUNIQUE


AND

July 1, 1992

AND


1992.




-
responsibilities.


h
-. - - -
'~~LQc
R chard C. Breeden
Chairman
Wim Kok
Minister of Finance
The Kingdom of The
FAX COVER SHEET

ON BEHALF OF: E.M. Andrews
Attached Documents:
SF-181
HJR 194
Motu Proprio
FAX COVER SHEET

ON BEHALF OF: E.M. Andrews
Attached Documents:
SF-181
HJR 194
Motu Proprio
ANDREWS, EDUARDO M. BSN: 371890366 06-2010

Agency Use Only
studies.
used to obtain it.
U Yes U No
RACIAL CATEGORY
attachment.
North Africa.
Standard Form 181

Revised August 2005
NSN 7540-01-099-3446
Print Form Save Form Clear Form

H. Res. 194

July 29, 2008.
mals;
2
linger to this day;
opportunity;
HRES 194 EH
3
their past;
resolutions; and
HRES 194 EH
4
ture.
Attest:
Clerk.
HRES 194 EH
The Holy See
APOSTOLIC LETTER
ISSUED MOTU PROPRIO

FRANCIS

IN CRIMINAL MATTERS
matters.
over:
See;
2
Law Matters;
of their functions;
been extradited.
3
FRANCISCUS

INDIGNOUPOPL
ICMNtaffJul10,2015
Hedidnttopthere.
America,APaid.
The Holy See

POPE FRANCIS
WORLD DAY OF PEACE
1 JANUARY 2015

2
society.
likeness of God.
3
13:1; 1 Pet 1:22; 2 Pet 1:7).
4
workers rights.
of slave labour.
their consent.
killed.
5
6
communications.

world of finance.
7
this reality.
45).
8
FRANCISCUS
[1] No. 1.
Reflection, 2013.
p. 7.

9

- 167 -


RESOLVES:
AGREEMENT
The Hague
December 11, 1989


Goverrmenc.


others;

-
securities:



of such securities:


limited to:

their &rr;

any security.

requested; and





Article.


,..
..
shall be obtained;

,.
i.5
Requested States.
Cmpetenc Authority.
1981.
ARTICLE 9 - cuss


or

Agrceaeut.
with.






COMMUNIQUE


AND

July 1, 1992

AND


1992.




-
responsibilities.


h
-. - - -
'~~LQc
R chard C. Breeden
Chairman
Wim Kok
Minister of Finance
The Kingdom of The

Faxed Merged Andrews SF-181

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Faxed Merged Andrews SF-181

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

FAX COVER SHEET

To: Office of Management and Budget Fax: 1-202-395-3888

From: MAVIS ALICIA ANDREWS Fax: +31848835086

# of pages including cover sheet: 34

Date: 14th March 2017

Re: SF-181 Race & Ethnicity Form

To: SSA Office of International Affairs Fax: 1-877-385-0645

From: MAVIS ALICIA ANDREWS Fax: +31848835086

# of pages including cover sheet: 34

Date: 14th March 2017

Re: SF-181 Race & Ethnicity Form

ANDREWS, MAVIS A. BSN: 184824916 06-1972

Privacy Act Statement

Standard Form 181

42 U.S.C. Section 2000e-16

Print Form Save Form Clear Form

In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

OF THE SUPREME PONTIFF

ON THE JURISDICTION OF JUDICIAL AUTHORITIES OF VATICAN CITY STATE

b) papal legates and diplomatic personnel of the Holy See.

This I decide and establish, anything to the contrary notwithstanding.

Copyright - Libreria Editrice Vaticana

MESSAGE OF HIS HOLINESS

NO LONGER SLAVES, BUT BROTHERS AND SISTERS

Listening to Gods plan for humanity

The many faces of slavery yesterday and today

Some deeper causes of slavery

A shared commitment to ending slavery

Intergovernmental organizations, in keeping with the principle of subsidiarity, are called to

Globalizing fraternity, not slavery or indifference

From the Vatican, 8 December 2014

[2] Message for the 2014 World Day of Peace, 2.

[3] Cf. Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Gaudium, 11.

[7] BENEDICT XVI, Encyclical Letter Caritas in Veritate, 66.

[9] BENEDICT XVI, Encyclical Letter Caritas in Veritate, 5.

[11] Address to Participants in the Second International Conference on Combating Human

Copyright - Libreria Editrice Vaticana

AG/RES. 2888 (XLVI-O/16)

AMERICAN DECLARATION ON THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES

(Adopted at the third plenary session, held on June 15, 2016)

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY,

RECALLING the contents of resolution AG/RES. 2867 (XLIV-O/14), Draft American

RECOGNIZING as well the important participation of indigenous peoples of the Americas in

The United States of America The Kingdom of the Netherlands

OF THE NETHERLMIDS ON HUlWAL ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANCE

The Coverament of the united States of America md the Goverrmenc of

the Kingdom of the Netherlands;

CONSIDERIBC that the development of the internationalization of trading

in securities requires.increasing exchange of information between the

MVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

a. the t e n 'Compctenc Authority' means:

- Por the United States of lurerica, the United States Securities

designee and other authorities designated by the United States

- Por the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Minister of Finance or

b. the term 'securities business' means the business of:

- effecting transactions in securities for the accounts of

- w i n g and selling securities for one's o m accomt;

to the desirability of inverting in, purchasing or selling

- acting as an interndiary ID making payments or deliveries or

facilities for comparison of data representing the terms of

- angaging on behalf of an issuer of securities in matters

- the muagement, prolotion, offer or sale of any i n r e s ~ e n t

thccounter-market, for shares, bonds. opttons and other

securities which is recognized, regulated or supervised by the