A B C D

1
2 Project Identification
3 Project Name RYK Sugar Mill
4 Case # 1
5 Project Overview
6 Unit set for economic evaluation m-m/h-bar
7 System water production (m/h) 60.00
8 System recovery (%) 62.41
9 Project Economic Variables
10 Project Life (years) 10
11 Interest rate (%) 10
12 Power cost ($kWh) 0.08
13 Pass 1
14 Projection Results
15 Pass 1 permeate production (m/h) 75.00
16 Pass 1 feed pressure (bar) 11.90
17 Pass 1 concentrate pressure (bar) 4.00
18 Pass 1 recovery (%) 79.00
19 Pass 1 energy recovery efficiency (%)
20 Capital Expense
21 Pass 1 pressure vessels 10
22 Pressure vessel cost ($/vessel) 580
23 Pass 1 capital for pressure vessels $5800.00
24 Product SW30HR-380 (5)
25 Pass 1 total elements 50
26 Element cost ($/element) $58.00
27 Pass 1 capital for elements ($) $2900.00
28 Pass 1 capital ($) $8700.00
29 Pass 1 capital($/m) $0.00
30 Operating Expense
31 Power
32 Pass 1 pumping power (kW) 75.00
33 Pass 1 pump specific energy (kWh/m) 0.00
34 Brine energy recovery (kWh/m) 0.00
35 Pass 1 net energy consumption (KWh/m) 0.00
36 Pass 1 net energy cost ($/year) $0.00
37 Energy expense NPV ($) 0.00
38 Pass 1 energy expense ($/m) $0.00
39 Membrane replacement cost
 A B C D
40 Pass 1 replacement rate (%/year) 5
41 Replacement price ($/element) $200.00
42 Pass 1 replacement cost for elements ($/year) $500.00
43 Pass 1 replacement membrane NPV ($) $3072.28
44 Pass 1 membrane replacement expense ($/m) $0.00
45 Operating expense subtotal
46 Pass 1 operating expense NPV ($) $3072.28
47 Pass 1 operating expense per m $0.00
48 Pass 1 Total
49 Pass 1 cost NPV ($) $2900.00
50 Life Cycle Cost ($/m) $0.00
51 Pass 2
52 Projection Results
53 Pass 2 permeate production (m/h) 60.00
54 Pass 2 feed pressure (bar) 8.50
55 Pass 2 concentrate pressure (bar) 4.00
56 Pass 2 recovery (%) 79.00
57 Capital Expense
58 Pass 2 pressure vessels 6
59 Pressure vessel cost ($/vessel) 580
60 Pass 2 capital for pressure vessels $3480.00
61 Product SW30HR-380 (1)
62 Pass 2 total elements 5
63 Element cost ($/element) $580.00
64 Pass 2 capital for elements ($) $2900.00
65 Pass 2 capital ($) $6380.00
66 Pass 2 capital($/m) $0.00
67 Operating Expense
68 Power
69 Pass 2 pumping power (kW) 7.50
70 Pass 2 pump specific energy (kWh/m) 0.00
71 Pass 2 net energy cost ($/year) $0.00
72 Pass 2 energy expense NPV ($) $0.00
73 Energy expense ($/m) $0.00
74 Membrane replacement cost
75 Pass 2 replacement rate (%/year) 5
76 Replacement price ($/element) $200.00
77 Pass 2 replacement cost for elements ($/year) $50.00
78 Pass 2 replacement membrane NPV ($) $307.23
 A B C D
79 Pass 2 membrane replacement expense ($/m) $0.00
80 Operating expense subtotal
81 Pass 2 operating expense NPV ($) $307.23
82 Pass 2 operating expense ($/m) $0.00
83 Pass 2 Total
84 Pass 2 cost NPV ($) $6687.23
85 Life Cycle Cost ($/m) $0.45
86 Total System
87 Capital $15080.00
88 Operating expense NPV ($) $3379.51
89 Cost of water NPV ($/m) $0.00
90
91
92 The Element Value Analysis (EVA) tool has been added to ROSA to allow for a snapshot
93 economic comparison of different elements operating in the same system under the same
94 operating parameters. While RO system modeling software historically provides a
95 snapshot comparison of the performance parameters such as feed pressure and permeate
96 quality, EVA provides an added dimension allowing the system designer to also evaluate
97 the impact of product selection on the lifetime operational cost of the system.
98
99 There are a significant number of cost factors outside of RO element selection; EVA is a
100 comparison tool only and is not a guarantee of actual capital or operating costs.
101
102 DISCLAIMER: NO WARRANTY, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, AND NO WARRANTY OF
103 MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS, IS GIVEN. Neither FilmTec Corporation nor The Dow
104 Chemical Company assume liability for results obtained or damages incurred from the
105 application of this information. FilmTec Corporation and The Dow Chemical Company
106 assume no liability, if, as a result of customers use of the ROSA membrane design
107 software, the customer should be sued for alleged infringement of any patent not owned or
108 controlled by the FilmTec Corporation nor The Dow Chemical Company.