Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
ROMULO TAKAD,
Accused.
x------------------------------------------x
The Case
The Facts
1
Lacsamana executed a promissory note and chattel mortgage
and thereafter claimed a tricycle, with the accused Romulo Takad,
from BDC.
The police arrested Takad and brought him to the police station
on November 21, 2007.
2
2. Carlos Parlade 50-year old, married, construction worker,
and resided at 84 West Road, Maybunga, Pasig City. He was also a
member of the Maybunga Security Force.
Takad recounted further that Aguirre pulled out the tricycle from
Marasigan on October 18, 2007 when Lacsamana was unable to
3
provide payment to the agreed-upon extension of October 17. They
then went to BDCs offices to pay the arrears but Aguirre informed
them that the company would no longer accept the late payment.
Aguirre also revealed to them that due to the default, the company
inferred that they had no means to pay for further installments.
The Issue
Arguments
4
I.
5
Here, the elements of carnapping were as follows:
II.
6
allow Lacsamana to pay her arrears, and his alibi of being asleep at
home on the day of the robbery.
The lame defense of denial was all that accused could offer
against the prosecution evidence. It was negative and self-serving
that required substantiation by clear and convincing evidence of non-
culpability to merit credibility. (People v. Asamuddin, G.R. No.
213913, September 02, 2015). Based on Takads own testimony, he
was home alone on the day that subject tricycle was stolen. He
admitted that Lacsamana was in Singapore, then. Lacsamana
confirmed it, saying she was on a business trip in Singapore from
November 16 to December 14, 2007. An excerpt from Lacsamanas
testimony, to wit:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Q. Where were you in the morning of November 21,
2007?
COURT: Cross?
A. 2007, sir.
7
A. Yes, sir, I did not have any knowledge of it.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
PROSEC. DE LEON: Mr. Witness, you mentioned
that you reside at 374 Villa Street, Palatiw, Pasig City.
How far is this from West Road, Maybunga, Pasig City?
A. Yes, sir.
A. Yes, sir.
A. Yes, sir.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
8
Testimony alone would have sufficed for purposes of
identification, but prosecution also provided corroborating evidence.
Positive identification was further proof of accuseds presence at the
crime scene when the carnapping was committed. (Diamante v.
People, G.R. No. 180992, September 4, 2009). During the hearing,
Parlade gave eyewitness testimony of what transpired the early
morning of November 21, 2007. That he saw Takad driving-off with
his tricycle. Mankas corroborated this with his own eyewitness
account of running after Parlade and the subject tricycle. Added to
that were their sworn statements and identification of Takad as the
carnapper at the police station.
III.
9
In fact, the efforts of the defense counsel during cross-
examination to cast doubt only succeeded in strengthening
prosecution witness testimony. (People v. Viente, G.R. No. 103299,
August 17, 1993). It only highlighted the defense desperation to
show Takad as a hapless victim and try to damage the prosecutions
airtight case.
IV.
Closing Statement
10
Prayer
ISIDRO DE LEON
Public Prosecutor
Prosecutors Office
Pasig City
Atty. Roll No. 00000
IBP 111111 01-01-01
PTR 0000000 02-02-02
MCLE Compliance III-000
Email: ideleon@yahoo.com
Copy furnished:
Midterm Paper
February 18, 2017
Trial Memorandum for Prosecution
by:
Student #: 16-07333
First year Set B
11