Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
technologies
By the same token, smaller components such as sensors, are growing in demand for
use in more portable medical devices. However, device functionality and reliability
cannot be sacrificed for smaller form factors. And for most manufacturers, budgets
arent unlimited, meaning low-cost components are ideal. This is why new sensor
innovations reaching the market need to feature smaller form factors while
maintaining high functionality and affordability.
Embedded devices, such as pressure sensors, are advancing in many ways to better
meet the needs and challenges of designing smaller medical devices. For example,
advanced low-cost basic pressure sensors have become a valuable commodity,
specifically with engineers who need to design and create low cost, high volume
assemblies in the healthcare sector. Original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) are
experiencing greater demand for products and need components that meet their
strict design requirements.
In the healthcare market, for example, the focus on designing technology that is
less intrusive and more portable for home use has led to a demand for smaller
devices, such as oxygen concentrators and continuous positive airway pressure
(CPAP) machines. In addition, the growing adoption of wearable devices to track a
persons health and fitness is having an impact. A 2016 report by Gartner estimates
that more than 109million units of fitness wearables will be sold in 2017 alone.
Even as devices become smaller for increased portability, users expect these
systems will maintain functionality and accuracy. And to design small, yet accurate,
medical devices, component parts such as sensors must also offer robust features
at a low cost. However, higher degrees of accuracy usually mean higher price tags,
which isnt ideal for low-cost, high-volume applications.
For example, certain ventilators can cost tens of thousands of dollars to design and
build. At that cost, its easier to justify using a $15 sensor because it represents less
than 1% of the total cost of the unit. Its harder to justify that $15 sensor in a blood
pressure monitoring application that only costs $40 to $120 for design and build.
The extra cost for 1.5% full scale span (FSS) the difference between output signal
measured at the upper and lower limits of the operating pressure range of Total
Error Band (TEB) improvement is not as easily justifiable.
Staying within budget has to be a priority. And if lower-cost components are the only
available option to a design engineer, how does one best evaluate low-cost sensors
for use in these types of highly functional systems? Deriving value from these types
of applications requires designers to view these components not purely as
commodities, but as critical technology enablers that can offer a competitive
advantage to the systems that design engineers create.
Accuracy is king
Functionality and reliability are important qualities for all medical devices.Improving
accuracy of a component device such as a sensor can result in higher functionality
and accuracy for these systems. For a low-cost, high-volume application, innovation
in small, affordable sensing technology has helped bolster measurement accuracy
that can rival some premium solutions.
The desire for more plug and play components explains, in part, the growing
popularity of amplified compensated rather than uncompensated pressure sensors.
Amplified compensated sensors can typically be used without the need for
additional modifications and can provide part-to-part interchangeability, calibration
and temperature compensation. A non-amplified compensated sensor may require
the use of amplification circuitry, assuming that an ASIC with a mV input A/D
converter is not being used. By contrast, uncompensated sensors provide a raw
output and usually require some form of compensation in order for them to be used
in many applications.
Lets examine a scenario that can help design engineers choose the ideal sensing
solution. An uncompensated sensor that has a TEB of greater than 30% FSS costs
$9, while a compensated sensor with a TEB of about 10% FSS costs $10. A fully
amplified plug-and-play sensor with a TEB of 1.5% costs $13. Knowing that low-cost
and high accuracy is important for their system design, the best option for
designers would be to implement additional circuitry to improve the accuracy of the
less-expensive sensors if the component costs less than $4, not to mention design
and calibration time involved. In doing a similar upfront analysis, design engineers
can better understand the advantages and benefits of a component devices price
and performance value.
Evolving functionality
Portable medical devices arent new, but these devices continue to be designed to
be smaller and easier to use for patients who prefer to receive higher-quality
healthcare in their own homes. However, neither design engineer nor patient can
afford to sacrifice functionality for size and portability. Recent innovations have
helped transform low-cost components into valuable, highly functional technologies
that are often ideal for the medical devices current technology renaissance.
Advancements in smaller sized and highly accurate low-cost components will
continue to help design engineers address some of the stricter design parameters in
todays medical device industry.