Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Power Cables
ECE 6618PD
In this section, influence of various parameters; like, conductor
configuration/material, insulation type, soil resistivity, and duct
geometry/material, and cable installation, on the Current Carrying
Capacity (Ampacity) are discussed. Ampacity calculations using
thermal equivalent circuit is also presented.
References:
1. Electrical Power Cable Engineering, Editor: William A. Thue, ISBN: 978-0-8247-4303-1 978-0-203-
97061-4 (electronic), June 2005. Chapters 14, 15, and 8/3.
2. Francisco de Leon, Calculation of underground cable ampacity, CYME International T&D, 2005 .
http://www.cyme.com/company/media/whitepapers/2005%2003%20UCA-FL.pdf
3. Also refer to the back references from [2], in specific, IEC Standards [8, 9, 14], CIGRE Paper [13],
and a paper by Neher and McGrath [10].
4. ICC Working Group C2 - IEEE 575, IEEE Guide for Bonding of Single-Conductor Power Cables.
5. http://www.cyme.com/software/cymcap/
6. IEC 60827 and IEC 60853
Current Carrying Capacity - Importance
The MV and HV cables are pushed to operate at the maximum
possible capacity, with todays power requirement
A Global Problem.
The following are some important points:
From the financial point of importance, to obtain optimal benefits,
there is an increased attention to fully utilize the capacity permitted
by the components.
Loads are constantly being added to the existing grid.
With the increased flexibility given for the power flow, the current
flow in the network becomes less predictable.
Unpredictable sources like wind/solar power; unpredictable
production due to deregulation energy trading.
Ampacity continuous current that can supply the load requirements without
raising the temperature above the accepted safe operation for all the
components used like the insulation for example.
2 S. Jayaram
Current Carrying Capacity and Losses
Flow of current means, power losses in the system.
Conductor losses depend upon the conductor
material, size, construction (solid, stranded,
segmented) and temperature.
Dielectric losses depend on cable dimensions,
permittivity, dissipation factor, and frequency.
Shield/sheath and amour losses are strongly affected
by sheath bonding methods discussed later; and
the materials used.
Additional losses are present if the cable is installed
in a steel pipe or casing.
these losses significantly influence the Ampacity.
3 S. Jayaram
PILC vs. XLPE Cables
PILC Cable Characteristics XLPE Cable Characteristics
For both the self contained oil filled and high pressure oil filled
cables, the range of operating temperature is ~ 85 oC.
4 S. Jayaram
Sources of Heat
Conductor
losses Sheath Losses
Dielectric
Losses
The maximum conductor current during the steady state operating conditions
depends on the allowable maximum temperature rise which is decided by the
insulating materials used in the cable design. With aging, as the materials
degrade, the current carrying capacity, defined as the Ampacity, also decreases.
Asset managers and network operation managers need to know the transport
capacity of power cables in normal and in emergency situations without
jeopardizing the reliability of the cable system. The ampacity or current rating
calculation gives the answer.
5 S. Jayaram
Sources of Heat
Conductor Losses:
The major losses in cables is the Ohmic losses in current carrying
conductors, due to the resistance of the conductors.
Segmental conductors
7 S. Jayaram
DC Resistance
8 S. Jayaram
AC Resistance
Under AC currents, both skin effects and
proximity effects influence the resistance,
as the current flows through the outer skin
of the conductor. Skin effect is highly
noticeable in conductors of larger cross
sectional area; thus Milliken conductors
are used in such cases.
When other power cables are in close
proximity to the conductor concerned, the
Depending on the cable core
magnetic field influences the current
construction; correction factors
density in the nearby conductor. The are available to include the skin
resulting non-uniform current density can effect and proximity effect.
be described in terms of an increased
conductor resistance for alternating
currents like the effect of mutual
inductance in transformers.
9 S. Jayaram
Losses in the Conducting Systems
Conductor Losses:
The following expression for resistance can be used to account for the
losses due to eddy current effects caused by both the skin ( s) and
proximity ( p) effects.
= [1 + + ]
Combining the effects of temperature and frequency;
, = 1 + 2 1 [1 + + ]
There are commercial software like ETAP, CYMCAP, USAmp that are
based on the Neher-McGrath method and IEC Standards, are used in the
industry.
10 S. Jayaram
Metallic Covering
The metallic shield is applied over the insulation shield and
serves several purposes including:
Return of the capacitive charging current under operating
conditions.
Conduction of the earth fault current in the case of a fault until
the system is tripped.
Reduction of the electrical influence on the cable
surroundings in the case of a fault, e.g. an earth fault.
Provision of protection against accidental contacts.
Protection of paper-insulated cables against leakage of
impregnating medium.
Mechanical protection of insulation while allowing the cable to
bend sufficiently.
11 S. Jayaram
Losses in the Sheaths
Magnetic fields due to current flow can induce voltages in
the nearby conducting elements Faradays Law.
In metallic shielded cables, the flow of currents in the phase
conductors induce a voltage in the metallic shields.
If the shields are connected to ground at more than one
point, current flows in the shield conductors (sheaths).
The effect is the increased heat generation; which
significantly reduces the current carrying capacity (ampacity)
of the phase conductor; by as much as 30-40%.
This is due to the fact that the amount of heat that can be
dissipated is fixed for a given set of thermal conditions.
If the current path is interrupted, voltages appear on the
sheath a line carrying 1000 amperes could have 100V on
the sheath for a line only 700m long.
12 S. Jayaram
Losses in the Sheaths
In a three phase cable, or three phase system, 5
different currents affect the induced voltages in the 6th
conductive circuit.
The sheath losses can be minimized either by (i)
single point bonding or cross bonding; and (ii)
reducing the quantity of the metal used in the shields.
Similar effects are seen in armour. One additional
point to note is the hysteresis losses as armour may
be made of magnetic material.
13 S. Jayaram
Losses in the Insulation System
There are various types of losses in the cable insulation;
and are briefly described below:
14 S. Jayaram
Losses in the Insulation System
Dielectric
oA
C
d
1 A
R &G ; conductivi ty
G d
1
tan
CR o
15 S. Jayaram
Losses in the Insulation System
The cable insulation system together with metallic sheath and the
conductor, forms a cylindrical capacitance. This capacitance is
not an ideal capacitor, rather has a loss component, and the
following formula can be used to find the losses in the dielectric,
Wd .
16 S. Jayaram
Influence of Installation Methods
The installation method used influences the ampacity of the
cable as the soil resistivity, temperature, and the fillers used
effect the temperature distribution; hence, the heat transfer.
17 S. Jayaram
Cable Installation Direct Burying
Cable Basement
22 S. Jayaram
Mechanisms of Heat Transfer
23 S. Jayaram
Mechanisms of Heat Transfer
Note the differences in the conductor and overall cable diameters. The heat has
to pass through a significant depth along many layers of different materials.
24 S. Jayaram
Practical Cable Designs
Based on different types of cable designs; we need to consider different types of
armours; and bonding used in the cable installations.
Single-core oil filled cable Single-core XLPE cable Three-core cable with optic
Single-core cable with
with armour. with armour. fibres, lead sheath and wire
lead sheath and wire
armour. armour.
Aluminium wire armour (AWA), used in single-core cables (non-magnetic).
Steel wire armour (SWA), used in multi-core cables (magnetic).
Phosphor bronze or tinned copper braid is also used when steel armour is not allowed.
25 S. Jayaram
Thermal Resistances
Insulation and jacket thermal resistances
depend upon dimensions and insulation
thermal resistivity.
Jacket-to-duct thermal resistance can be
found based on empirical calculations. It can
result in 10 20% lower ampacity than if the
cables were directly buried.
26 S. Jayaram
Ampacity Calculations
The main process involved in heat transfer is by conduction.
Analogous to electrical conduction, we can define the heat
conduction using Ohms Law:
W.T=
Where,
W = the flow of heat (W/m); as ampacity calculations are given per
meter length of cable.
T = the thermal resistance of the material through which heat flows
(Km/W)
= the difference in temperature (oK)
Conductor losses
Sheath Losses
Dielectric
27 Losses S. Jayaram
Heat Transfer and Thermal Resistances
Equivalent circuit representation of flow of heat:
T1 to T4 represent the thermal
resistances of the insulation (T1),
armour bedding (T2), outer non-
metallic sheath (T3), and the
surrounding environment (T4)
respectively.
28 S. Jayaram
Ampacity Calculations
The ampacity, I, that gives the allowable conductor
temperature for the given operating conditions can then be
found using the following thermal-electrical analogy model.
Neher-McGrath Method
Equivalent Circuit representing the sources of heat (Ws),
thermal resistances (Ts) and temperature gradient.
29 S. Jayaram
Ampacity Calculations
30 S. Jayaram
Ampacity Calculations
31 S. Jayaram
Ampacity Calculations
Step2 Find the electrical losses:
Find , at a desired temperature.
2 = 1[1 + 2 1 ]
Find the equivalent , apply the corrections skin effect and proximity
effect. Empirical formulas are available to find s and p.
, = 1 + 2 1 [1 + + ]
32 S. Jayaram
Ampacity Calculations
Find the Sheath losses using the relationship:
2
I Sheath RSheath
1 2
I Conductor RConductor
Conductor losses 2
Sheath Losses I Armour RArmour
2 2
Dielectric
Losses I Conductor RConductor
The quantity 1 is called the sheath loss factor and is equal to the ratio of the total
losses in the metallic sheath to the total conductor losses. Similarly, 2 is called the
armor loss factor and is equal to the ratio of the total losses in the metallic armor to
the total conductor losses.
Sometimes, the terms sheath and armour are used interchangeably. In any case, the
circulating and eddy currents in these conductive parts of a cable add to sheath losses.
The induced effects are minimized by using a trefoil configuration of three single core
cables, or three-phase cables. Also, note that the sheath losses are minimized by using
special bonding systems the topic for next class.
33 S. Jayaram
Ampacity Calculations
Find the dielectric losses using the relationship:
The ampacity of the cable can be calculated using the expression below.
However, in real practice, the ampacity calculation is much more
complex as you can see from slides following slides.
The calculations are based on IEC 60287. But, you can refer to the article listed
below. As many of the equations used are empirical, there are some differences.
http://www.cyme.com/company/media/whitepapers/2005%2003%20UCA-FL.pdf
34 S. Jayaram
Technical Specification Requirements -
Ampacity Design
System Electrical Characteristics:
System Operating Voltages (Normal and Maximum VL-G, VL-L, kV)
System Frequency (Hz)
Cable Specification & Max. Conductor Temperatures
Conductor material specifications (affects ampacity, losses)
Conductor minimum or specific cross-sectional areas (affects ampacity, losses)
Insulation material specifications (affects maximum normal, emergency and
short-circuit conductor temperature & dielectric losses)
Sheath & armoring design requirements (affects losses and short-circuit rating)
36 S. Jayaram