Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
ICS
English Version
This draft European Standard is submitted to CEN members for enquiry. It has been drawn up by the Technical Committee CEN/TC 319.
If this draft becomes a European Standard, CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which
stipulate the conditions for giving this European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration.
This draft European Standard was established by CEN in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language
made by translation under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the Management Centre has the same
status as the official versions.
CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France,
Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia,
Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and United Kingdom.
Recipients of this draft are invited to submit, with their comments, notification of any relevant patent rights of which they are aware and to
provide supporting documentation.
Warning : This document is not a European Standard. It is distributed for review and comments. It is subject to change without notice and
shall not be referred to as a European Standard.
2005 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. prEN 15341:2005: E
worldwide for CEN national Members.
prEN 15341:2005 (E)
Contents Page
Foreword..............................................................................................................................................................3
1 Scope ......................................................................................................................................................3
2 Normative references ............................................................................................................................3
3 Terms and definitions ...........................................................................................................................3
4 Maintenance Performance ....................................................................................................................4
5 System of indicators .............................................................................................................................4
5.1 Objectives...............................................................................................................................................4
5.2 Architecture of key indicators ..............................................................................................................5
6 Indicators................................................................................................................................................5
6.1 Economical Key Indicators...................................................................................................................6
6.1.1 LEVEL 1 ..................................................................................................................................................6
6.1.2 LEVEL 2 ..................................................................................................................................................6
6.1.3 LEVEL 3 ..................................................................................................................................................7
6.2 Technical key indicators .......................................................................................................................8
6.2.1 LEVEL 1 ..................................................................................................................................................8
6.2.2 LEVEL 2 ..................................................................................................................................................8
6.2.3 LEVEL 3 ..................................................................................................................................................9
6.3 Organisational indicators ...................................................................................................................10
6.3.1 LEVEL 1 ................................................................................................................................................10
6.3.2 LEVEL 2 ................................................................................................................................................10
6.3.3 LEVEL 3 ................................................................................................................................................10
7 Methodology for the selection and use of key performance indicators for maintenance ...........12
7.1 Defining the objectives which characterise the maintenance management process ..................12
7.2 Selecting the relevant indicators .......................................................................................................13
7.3 Defining and collecting the necessary basic data ...........................................................................13
7.4 Calculating the indicators and selecting the type of representation .............................................14
7.4.1 Frequency of calculating of the indicators .......................................................................................14
7.4.2 Type of presentation ...........................................................................................................................14
7.4.3 Test and validation ..............................................................................................................................14
7.4.4 Analysis of the results ........................................................................................................................14
Annex A (normative) Key Indicators Factors List..........................................................................................15
2
prEN 15341:2005 (E)
Foreword
This document (prEN 15341:2005) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 319 Maintenance,
the secretariat of which is held by UNI.
Introduction
This European Standard provides the Maintenance Key Performance Indicators to support management in
achieving maintenance excellence and utilize technical assets in a competitive manner. The majority of these
indicators are applicable to all industrial and supporting facilities (buildings, infrastructure, transportation,
distribution, networks, etc). The indicators should be used to:
1 Scope
This European standard describes a system for management of Key Performance Indicators to measure
maintenance performance in the framework of the influencing factors such as the economical, technical and
organizational aspects, to appraise and to improve efficiency and effectiveness in order to achieve a
excellence in maintenance of Technical Assets.
2 Normative references
This European Standard incorporates by dated or undated reference, provisions from other publications.
These normative references are cited at the appropriate places in the text and the publications are listed
hereafter. For dated references, subsequent amendments to or revisions of any of these publications apply to
this European Standard only when incorporated in it by amendment or revision. For undated references the
latest edition of the publication referred to applies (including amendments).
EN 13306:2001, Maintenance-Terminology.
3
prEN 15341:2005 (E)
4 Maintenance Performance
Maintenance Performance is the result of the utilization of resources in providing actions to retain an item in,
or restore it to, a state in which it can perform the required function. It can be expressed as an achieved or
expected result.
The Maintenance Performance is dependent upon both external and internal influencing factors such as:
location, culture, transformation and service processes, size, utilization rate and age and is achieved by
implementing corrective, preventive and improvement maintenance, using labour, information, materials,
organisational methodologies, tools and operating techniques.
5 System of indicators
This system of key performance indicators is structured into three groups (economic, technical and
organisational) in order to cover all aspects of maintenance.
Any indicator can be evaluated as a ratio between factors (numerator and denominator) measuring activities,
resources or events, according to a given formula.
The indicators are used to measure any quantitative aspect or characteristic of an indenture level and for
homogeneous comparison.
Whenever a factor is defined by using the words internal or external, the derived indicator, should also be
used only for internal or external influences, as appropriate.
5.1 Objectives
When the actual or expected performance is not satisfactory it encourages the management to define
objectives and strategies to improve from an economic, technical or organisational point of view using this
system of indicators which allows the organisation to:
c) compare performance;
e) set objectives;
on a periodic basis, for instance by preparing and following-up a budget, and during the assessment of
the performance:
on a spot basis, for instance within the framework of specific audits, studies and/or benchmarking.
4
prEN 15341:2005 (E)
The period of time to be considered for measurement depends on the company policy and management
approach.
The following matrix illustrates the external and internal factors that influence maintenance performance and
consequently the three groups of key indicators:
External factors are variable conditions outside of the company management control.
Internal factors are referred to group, company, factory, plant outside of the maintenance management control,
but inside of the company management control.
When using the key maintenance performance indicators, it is important to consider these influencing factors
as prerequisites in order to avoid misleading evaluations and comparisons through not having homogeneous
conditions.
External
influencing
factors
Location
Indicator Level
Society Culture
National Labour
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Cost
Laws Regulations Economic E7 E8 E9 E10 E15 E16 E17
E1 E2 E3 E4
E11 E12 E13 E18 E19 E20
Sector / Branches indicators E5 E6
E14 E21 E23 E24
Indicator Group
T7 T8 T9 T10
Internal Technical T11 T12 T13
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T14 T15 T16
influencing Indicators T17 T18 T19
factors T20 T21
6 Indicators
When calculating the indicators, denominator and numerator factors shall be referred to the same activity/item
and to the same period of time (year, quarter, month, etc.). These factors are explained in the terminology
sheet at the end of this document.
Most of the indicators can be used at different levels, depending on whether they are used to measure the
performance of a plant production, one production line, or a given equipment or item, etc.
5
prEN 15341:2005 (E)
The indicators in this standard are structured in levels which represent their breakdown structure. Indicators
below level one are a detailed description of indicators at higher level.
The indicators in this standard are numbered by level as a means of identification and not as an indication of
importance.
These indicators can be referred to the internal maintenance, external maintenance or both.
The term Time is in general used to describe time units related to the equipment and its performance.
The terms Hours or Man hours describe the hours delivered to the maintenance activities.
6.1.1 LEVEL 1
6.1.2 LEVEL 2
6
prEN 15341:2005 (E)
6.1.3 LEVEL 3
7
prEN 15341:2005 (E)
6.2.1 LEVEL 1
6.2.2 LEVEL 2
8
prEN 15341:2005 (E)
6.2.3 LEVEL 3
T19 Man hours used for planning in a systematic maintenance planning process (Initial planning)
Total internal maintenance personnel man hours
T20 Planned and scheduled maintenance time causing production down time
Planned and scheduled total maintenance time requiring down time
9
prEN 15341:2005 (E)
6.3.1 LEVEL 1
O7 Man-hours lost due to injuries for maintenance personnel x 10000 (severity rate)
Total man hours worked by maintenance personnel
6.3.2 LEVEL 2
6.3.3 LEVEL 3
10
prEN 15341:2005 (E)
O23 Number of maintenance internal personnel man hours for training x 100
Total internal maintenance man hours
O25 Total man hours spent by direct personnel on planned and scheduled activities
Total man hours planned and scheduled to direct personnel
11
prEN 15341:2005 (E)
7 Methodology for the selection and use of key performance indicators for
maintenance
7.1 Defining the objectives which characterise the maintenance management process
In order to select relevant indicators, the first step is to define the objectives to be reached at each level of the
enterprise.
At the company level, the requirement is to identify how maintenance can be managed in order to improve
global performance (profits, market shares, competitiveness etc). In this case, the most efficient means of
maintenance improvement shall be determined.
At the systems level and production lines, the maintenance objectives can address some particular
performance factors, which have been identified through previous analysis, such as:
improvement of availability;
etc.
At the equipment level, machines or types of machines, better control of the following may be desirable:
reliability;
costs;
duration of stops;
etc.
The objectives may also consist of giving advice for decisions concerning:
investments;
etc.
12
prEN 15341:2005 (E)
When the objectives have been defined, and the performance parameters to be measured have been
identified, the next step is to find the indicators which allow measuring these parameters. When selecting the
indicators for maintenance management, the system could for example include:
the safety;
etc.
An indicator is relevant when its value, or its evaluation is correlated with the evaluation of the performance
parameter to be measured. A relevant indicator shall be one element of decision making. That means that the
data which constitute this indicator shall have a relation to the defined objective. This link can be proved by
analysis or through interview of experts. Statistical techniques can also be utilised in order to ascertain
correlations between indicators.
the first consists of choosing from amongst list of existing indicators those, which after analysis, fulfil the
requirements;
the second starts from the following methods which begin with the evaluation of the various processes of
maintenance which can be obtained through functional analysis.
the data to be collected in order to determine the values required for the indicator;
the tools required for the measurement (documents, counters, sensors, analysers, computerized
maintenance management system, etc.).
In order to make the possible evaluation and comparisons easier, it is obligatory that the collected data are in
conformity with the standardised definitions when they exist (see EN 13306). If the definition does not exist, it
will be necessary to derive such a definition.
13
prEN 15341:2005 (E)
Independently from the collection of the data, the frequency of the calculation could be predetermined. (For
instance, it is possible to evaluate a quarterly indicator with monthly collected data)
the changes over time (gradient, seasonality, etc.) of the measured performance;
The utilisation of indicators generally requires a graphical presentation according to the required utilisation and
to the importance of the series of data.
Before the calculation is used as a routine, each indicator will be calculated by using a representative sample
during a significant period which will allow validation of:
The next steps, that are outside the scope of this standard, are to build scorecards to analyse and to take the
required actions.
14
prEN 15341:2005 (E)
Annex A
(normative)
15
prEN 15341:2005 (E)
16
prEN 15341:2005 (E)
17
prEN 15341:2005 (E)
18
prEN 15341:2005 (E)
19
prEN 15341:2005 (E)
20
prEN 15341:2005 (E)
21
prEN 15341:2005 (E)
22
prEN 15341:2005 (E)
23
prEN 15341:2005 (E)
24
prEN 15341:2005 (E)
25
prEN 15341:2005 (E)
26