Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
BY
CHANTALE DOUCET AND BENOIT VOYZELLE
A summary of the most popular methods and devices currently used to test support tendons in
the laboratory is shown in Figure 1, for both static and dynamic conditions. The simplest way to
describe these methods and devices might be to classify these into direct and indirect methods,
depending if the load is applied directly on the tendon or test specimen, as in the case of direct
methods, or on the grouted or holding pipe, as in the case of indirect methods. Well-known
references to describe and illustrate each test method are included in Figure 1. Intermediate test
configurations and different loading mechanisms, e.g. loading at the face plate versus across a
simulated joint for both static and dynamic testing, direct impact versus momentum transfer
loading for dynamic testing, can make the proposed description somewhat arbitrary and
theoretical. In all instances, a simple and objective description of the experimental work under
review, along with a proper presentation of the results is presented.
In the laboratory, static tests are usually carried out following the standard procedure developed
for in situ pull tests (ASTM 2008). Notwithstanding the mode of loading, e.g. direct pull-test at
one end of the bolt, or split-tube test across a simulated joint, the test procedure is relatively
simple, with relatively straight-forward analysis. Only tensile devices are discussed here. The
situation is slightly more complicated with dynamic testing, with two major facilities currently in
operation around the world, e.g. the CANMET-MMSL facility located in Ottawa (Ontario) and
the WASM facility located in Kalgoorlie (Western Australia). The main displacement is
measured at the end of the bolt, or at the point of impact and across a simulated joint along the
holding or connecting pipe. In situ standard pull-test is the most common direct static test
carried out in the field (ASTM 2008). Test results reported in the Technical Information Data
Sheets have been clearly identified according to the devices, procedures and equipments used for
testing.
Direct dynamic
Direct quasi-static
impact test method
test method
(Standard impact drop
(Standard pull-test
test on bolt end or
on bolt end)
intermediate joint)
CANMET-MMSL / K. Judge.
CANMET-MMSL / K. Judge.
The definition of terms used in the Technical Information Data Sheets is presented in Table 1.
Although comprehensive, the table has been reduced to its most simple expression, with only
essential terms being listed, and clear and concise definitions being included.
Over the past 8 years, various testing programs were undertaken with the participation of the
mining industry and manufacturers to evaluate the behavior of various bolts under different
dynamic loading conditions. Prior to subjecting the bolts to dynamic impacts, pull tests were
performed and compared to in situ test results, when available, in order to ensure that the
laboratory installation is close to the actual behavior of the bolt underground. An overview of
the bolts tested and the results are presented in the following sections and summarized in Table
2. Test results reported in Table 2 were conducted with an impact velocity varying between 4.5
and 5.4 m/s. The maximum impact energy corresponds to the maximum energy the bolt could be
impacted with before failure. The maximum impact energy is used to characterize the bolts
instead of the absorbed energy because, as will be discussed in the next section, bolts will behave
very differently depending on their yielding mechanism and some can absorb more energy than
others for the same impact. Impact energy should therefore be used as the design parameter
because that is the ultimate energy that the bolt could withstand. The displacement values are
the displacement of the bolt measured at the plate end after one impact of the maximum impact
energy recorded in Table 2. The average load is an average of the load measured after the peak
load. The testing configuration used is also specified as it can affect the results significantly.
For example, the Rebar bolt was tested with both test configurations and the energy capacity
varies from 5 kJ, with the impact directly on the bolt plate (i.e. continuous tube), to 14 kJ with
the impact above the bolt plate (split tube).
A similar compilation as presented in Potvin et al (2010) is shown in Figure 2. This figure
groups testing results on bolts subjected to one impact of variable energy. The impact velocities
vary between 3 and 6.3 m/s, for an average of 5.3 m/s. Three main zones are identified: static
support, yielding support stretching and yielding support plowing, sliding. The static
support zone is composed primarily of the mechanical rock bolts and rebars, which are
traditionally installed as primary support. Two yielding support zones are identified depending
on the yielding mechanism of the bolts. The stretching zone is composed primarily of the D-
Bolts which will accumulate a lot of load over a relatively small displacement. The
plowing/sliding zone is composed of the MCB, Roofex and Yield-Lok which will dissipate the
energy over longer displacements through plowing and/or sliding and minimal stretching of the
bolt. Thicker bars provide better energy absorption as shown by comparing the 20-mm diameter
D-Bolt versus the 22-mm diameter. The same goes when comparing the Rx8D with the Rx20D.
Figure 3 presents into greater details the load-displacement behaviour of the bolts when
subjected to one impact of 30 kJ and 5.4 m/s. The difference between the stretching and
sliding/plowing bolts is noticeable. All the bolts presented can sustain the impact energy of 30
kJ but they dissipate the energy in different ways. Larger diameter bolts will accept higher loads
and will not displace through stretching or plowing/sliding as much as smaller bolts.
Maximun
Average
Support Impact Displacement Test
Bolt Type Energy Load
Category (mm) Configuration
(kJ) (kN)
Mechanical Bolt
2.2 43 6 16 Continuous tube
Static Support
Resin Rebar
5 5 160 Continuous tube
(Type #6 - 20 mm)
Resin Rebar
14 58 280 Split tube
(Type #6 - 20 mm)
Yield-Lok
43 750 95 7 Continuous tube
750 mm of coating
50
40
30
20
10
static support
0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4
Plate Displacement (m)
300
MCB33FD (2.1m)
Rx20D (0.45m)
250 Rx8D (0.80m)
Yield-Lok (0.75m)
D-Bolt (20mm x 0.8m)
Load (kN)
200
150
100
50
0
0 200 400 600 800
Displacement (mm)
Figure 3. Load versus Displacement behaviours of various bolts after one impact of 30 kJ and 5.4 m/s.
Anderson, T., Conlon, B. & Judge, K. (2006). In situ tendon pull tests. Division Report CANMET-
MMSL 06-008 (TR), CANMET Mining and Minerals Sciences Laboratories, Natural Resources
Canada, Ottawa (Ontario), 41 p.
ASTM (2007). Standard Test Method for Rock Bolt Anchor Pull Test. Standard Designation D4435-04,
ASTM International, West Conshohocken (Pennsylvania), 6 p.
ASTM (2008). Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Determination of Rock Anchor Capacities by Pull
and Drop Tests. Standard Designation D7401-08, ASTM International, West Conshohocken
(Pennsylvania), 7 p.
Atlas Copco (2004). Rock Reinforcement Product Information Sheets. Atlas Copco Construction and
Mining (Canada), Lively (Ontario), 32 p.
Atlas Copco (2010). Rock Reinforcement Product Information Sheets. Website
Beauchamp, L.A. (2006). Ground Support Manual. Mines and Aggregates Safety and Health
Association (MASHA), North Bay (Ontario), 285 p.
Cai, M., Champaigne, D. & Kaiser, P.K. (2010). Development of a fully debonded cone bolt for rockburst
support. Proceedings of the 5th International Seminar on Deep and High Stress Mining, Santiago,
Chile, eds. M. Van Sint Jan and Y. Potvin, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), Australia,
329-342.
Doucet, C. & Gradnik, R. (2010). Recent developments of the Roofex bolt. Proceedings of the 5th
International Seminar on Deep and High Stress Mining, Santiago, Chile, eds. M. Van Sint Jan and Y.
Potvin, Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), Australia, 353-366.
DSI (2009). Mining and Tunneling Products Catalogue. Dywidag Systems International (DSI), DSI
Mining Products, Sudbury (Ontario), 107 p.
Duraset (2005). Rock Tendon Support Product Information Sheets. Duraset/Grinaker-LTA Mining
Products, Alberton/Johannesburg (South Africa), 30 p.
Gaudreau, D., Aubertin, M. & Simon, R. (2004). Performance assessment of tendon support systems
submitted to dynamic loading. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Ground Support,
28-30 September, Perth (Western Australia), E. Villaescusa and Y. Potvin, Editors, A.A. Balkema
Publishers, Leiden (Netherlands), 299-312.
Hadjigeorgiou, J. & Charette, F. (2009). Guide pratique du soutnement minier, 2e dition, Association
minire du Qubec, 162 p.
Hoek, E. (2007). Practical Rock Engineering Chapter 14: Rockbolts and cables. Lecture notes,
Rocscience Inc., Toronto, (Ontario), 21 p.
Jager, A.J. (1992). Two new support units for the control of rockburst damage. Proceedings of the
2nd International Symposium on Rock Support, eds. P.K. Kaiser and D.R. McCreath, A.A. Balkema
Publishers, Rotterdam (Netherlands), 621-631.
Jennmar of Canada (2011). Yield-Lok Bolt A new generation of yielding rock support. Product data
sheet.
Li. C.C. (2010). A new energy-absorbing bolt for rock support in high stress rock masses. Int. Jour. of
Rock Mech. & Mining Sc., 47 (2010), 396-404.
Li, C. & Charette, F. (2010). Dynamic performance of D-Bolt. Proceedings of the 5th International
Seminar on Deep and High Stress Mining, Santiago, Chile, eds. M. Van Sint Jan and Y. Potvin,
Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), Australia, 321-328.
Li, C.C & Doucet, C. (2011). Performance of D-Bolts under dynamic loading. Rock Mech. Rock Eng.
DOI 10.1007/s00603-011-0202-1.
Any determination and/or reference made in these technical data sheets with respect to
any specific commercial product, process or service by trade name, trademark,
manufacturer or otherwise, shall be considered to be opinion. CanmetMINING makes
no representation or warranty respecting the results arising therefrom, either expressly
or implied by law or otherwise, including but not limited to implied warranties or
conditions of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. The views and opinions
of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of CanmetMINING
and may not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes.
TECHNICAL INFORMATION DATA SHEET NO. 1 STANDARD MECHANICAL BOLT.
120
100
Load (kN)
80
60
40
MASHA / Beauchamp 2006.
20
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Plate End Displacement (mm)
Load (kN)
according to ASTM D4435 standard test method. 40
(2)
Bolts 1.5 m long. Bolts were installed in a 33-mm diameter hole drilled
through high strength concrete poured and cured in 127-mm diameter steel
tubes. Loads and displacements measured at the plate or tube collar. Tests 20
stopped at failure, after 90-120 mm of displacement. Tests carried out at
CANMET-MMSL Test Facility, Ottawa (ON).
0
(3)
Bolts 1.5 m long. Single impact, impact energy 2.2 kJ, impact velocity 0 10 20 30 40 50
3.1 m/s. Tests carried out at CANMET-MMSL Test Facility, Ottawa Plate End Displacement (mm)
(ON), with the same installation procedure as the laboratory static tests, CANMET-MMSL. Laboratory Dynamic Test.
using the continuous tube configuration.
ILLUSTRATION
Hoek 2007
Load (kN)
100
80
60
40
20
0
0 10 20 30
Plate End Displacement (mm)
Load (kN)
or tube collar. Tests stopped at failure, after 25 mm of displacement.
Tests carried out at CANMET-MMSL Test Facility, Ottawa (ON). 150
(3)
Threaded bolts 1.8 m long. Single impact, impact energy 14.2 kJ, impact 100
velocity 5 m/s. Tests carried out at CANMET-MMSL Test Facility,
Ottawa (ON), using the split-tube and continuous tube configurations. 50
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Plate End Displacement (mm)
CANMET-MMSL. Split-tube Configuration.
ILLUSTRATION
DSI 2009
ILLUSTRATION
2005 Duraset.
Source: Jager 1992, Player 2004, Duraset 2005, Villaescusa et al. 2007.
Load (kN)
120
100
80
60
40
Mansour Mining 2011 20
0
0 50 100 150 200 250
Plate End Displacement (mm)
Load (kN)
(2)
Bolts 2.23 m long coated with grease. Loads and displacements measured
at the plate or hole collar. Tests carried out at CANMET-MMSL Bells 150
Corners Complex (Ottawa).
100
(3)
Bolts 1.63 m long coated with grease. Single impact, impact energy 16 kJ
and impact velocity 5.4 m/s. Tests carried out at CANMET-MMSL Bells 50
Corners Complex (Ottawa) using the continuous tube configuration.
0
0 50 100 150
Plate End Displacement (mm)
CANMET-MMSL.
ILLUSTRATION
MCB33FD - Laboratory Static Test
200
180
160
140
Load (kN)
120
100
80
60
40
Cai et al. 2010 20
0
0 50 100 150
Plate End Displacement (mm)
CANMET-MMSL.
NOTES: N/A Not available, N/S Not specified.
(1)
Bolts 2.28 m long with shrink wrap. Loads and displacements measured MCB33FD - Dynamic Test
at the plate or hole collar. Tests stopped at failure. Tests carried out at 225
CANMET-MMSL Bells Corners Complex (Ottawa). 200
(2) 175
Bolts 2.28 m long with shrink wrap. Single impact, impact energy 30 kJ
and impact velocity 5.4 m/s. Tests carried out at CANMET-MMSL Bells Load (kN) 150
Corners Complex (Ottawa), using the split-tube configuration. 125
100
75
50
25
0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Plate End Displacement (mm)
CANMET-MMSL.
Load (kN)
120
100
80
60
40
20
Mansour Mining 2011.
0
0 50 100 150
Plate End Displacement (mm)
ILLUSTRATION
Duraset
80
Load (kN)
60
Nut
Plate
Mixing/stop Steel sleeve Energy absorber Steel sleeve Inner steel bar 40
element
20
Adapted from Atlas Copco 2010.
0
0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275
Plate Displacement (mm)
10
0
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Plate Displacement (mm)
ILLUSTRATION
Roofex Rx20S - Static Test
300
250
200
Load (kN)
Gradnik and Doucet 2010. 150
100
50
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Plate Displacement (mm)
measured at both bolt ends. Tests carried out at CANMET-MMSL Test Rx20D-1000 mm
Facility, Ottawa (ON), using the continuous tube configuration. 10 Rx20D-1000 mm failed
0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Plate Displacement (mm)
250
200
Load (kN)
150
Li 2010 100
50
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Plate End Displacement (mm)
CANMET-MMSL.
Displacement (mm)
collar. Tests carried out at CANMET-MMSL Test Facility, Ottawa Displ per drop, 20mm x 1.5m
200 Displ at failure, 20mm x 1.5m
(ON), using a split-tube configuration to examine the elongation of the
smooth section. 150
(3)
Bolts 2.1 m long. Loads and displacements measured at both bolt ends.
Tests carried out at CANMET-MMSL Test Facility, Ottawa (ON), using 100
the split-tube configuration. Max IE = 43 kJ Max IE = 56 kJ
50
for 20 mm bolt for 22 mm bolt
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Impact energy, IE (kJ)
ILLUSTRATION
Wu et al. 2010.
Jennmar of Canada 2011. YL-D: Yield Lok Dynamic; YL-S: Yield Lok
Static
(2)
No laboratory tests were conducted. 200 Impact Energy
16.4 kJ
(3) 175
Bolts 1.7 m long with 750 mm long polymer coating. Loads and 43.0 kJ
displacements measured at both bolt ends. Tests carried out at 150
Load (kN)
CANMET-MMSL Test Facility, Ottawa (ON), using the continuous 125
tube configuration.
100
75
50
25
0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
Plate End Displacement (mm)
CANMET-MMSL.