Sei sulla pagina 1di 1

Austria v. NLRC G.R. No.

124382 August 16, 1999 5) Commission of an offense against the person of employer's duly
authorized representative as grounds for the termination of his
KTA: Relationship of the church as an employer and the minister as services.
an employee is purely secular in nature because it has no relation with
the practice of faith, worship or doctrines of the church, such affairs Petitioner filed a complaint with the Labor Arbiter for illegal
are governed by labor laws. The Labor Code applies to all dismissal, and sued the SDA for reinstatement and backwages plus
establishments, whether religious or not. damages. Decision was rendered in favor of petitioner.

Facts: SDA appealed to the NLRC. Decision was rendered in favor of


The Seventh Day Adventists(SDA) is a religious corporation respondent.
under Philippine law. The petitioner was a pastor of the SDA for 28
years from 1963 until 1991, when his services were terminated. Issue:
1. Whether or not the termination of the services of the petitioner is an
On various occasions from August to October 1991, Austria ecclesiastical affair, and, as such, involves the separation of church and
received several communications form Ibesate, the treasurer of the state.
Negros Mission, asking him to admit accountability and responsibility
for the church tithes and offerings collected by his wife, Thelma 2. Whether or not the Labor Arbiter/NLRC has jurisdiction to try and
Austria, in his district and to remit the same to the Negros Mission. decide the complaint filed by petitioner against the SDA.

The petitioner answered saying that he should not be made Held/Ratio:


accountable since it was Pastor Buhat and Ibesate who authorized his 1. No. The matter at hand relates to the church and its religious
wife to collect the tithes and offerings since he was very ill to be able ministers but what is involved here is the relationship of the church as
to do the collecting. an employer and the minister as an employee, which is purely
secular because it has no relationship with the practice of faith,
A fact-finding committee was created worship or doctrines. The grounds invoked for petitioners
to investigate. The petitioner received a letter of dismissal citing: dismissal are all based on Art. 282 of Labor Code.
1) Misappropriation of denominational funds;
2) Willful breach of trust; 2. Yes. SDA was exercising its management prerogative (not religious
3) Serious misconduct; prerogative) to fire an employee which it believes is unfit for the job. It
4) Gross and habitual neglect of duties; and would have been a different case if Austria was expelled or
excommunicated from the SDA.

Potrebbero piacerti anche