Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Overall outcomes
A total of 422 students were listed as candidates for this subject. The average
overall mark attained by students who completed the assessment for this course
is 55.40%. This is within what might be considered an acceptable range for a first
year introductory course with many students who have not studied accounting
previously and compares well to the average result in previous years.
The grade distribution below (which includes all students) also shows a
significant number of students recording very strong overall marks 87 (approx.
20% of the group) achieved marks at first class level. However, the manner in
which these results have been achieved does give some cause for concern. The
average mark awarded for the examination was only 47.07% and it is
disappointing that on average students could only attain third class in the
examination. The presence of such a large tail of students being awarded an
overall fail mark, is a concern, especially given that the average mark attained
on the December computer based test was 80%. Based on the examination
alone around one third of students would have failed.
The December test was first introduced to the assessment for this course partly
so that students would have feedback from their performance in the test and
would then have time to make adjustment before the examination. It now seems
that what might be happening is that, conversely, many students react to a good
mark in the test by not preparing properly for the examination and so the results
in that exam are worse that should be expected.
Examination performance
The first table below shows the distribution of total marks (out of 75) awarded for
the examination, and students can benchmark themselves against the rest of the
group on the basis of their own exam mark (total mark awarded for the course
less mark from the December assessment). The second table shows the question
by question averages and is followed by observations from markers about
strengths and weakness in the ways in which different questions were answered.
A separate feedback report on the Computer Based Assessment in December
has been made available previously in Blackboard
.
Question by question marks
Section Section Section
A B C
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5
Mean 18.4 10.6 9.3 8.2 4.8
n 407 354 50 288 82
Further to the earlier points about the disappointing level of overall performance
in the examination the main general comments are:
1. A large proportion of students simply did not seem to have come to terms
with basic accounting technique. The examination questions mirror the kind
of things covered extensively in workshops, lecture illustrations and self-
study exercises but too few students really demonstrated that they had
mastered technical matters and so tended to pick up less than full marks on
every section/question.
2. A significant number also either did not answer three questions or answered
questions in very cursory terms, perhaps demonstrating knowledge of a term
or idea but not understanding of its meaning. In these cases the volume of
material included certainly did not suggest that this incompleteness and
brevity was caused by time pressure, but rather by insufficient preparation.
3. There was a striking pattern in the choice of optional questions, with the
large majority of students picking question 2 (ratio analysis) rather than
question 3 (cash flow) in Section B and question 4 (accounting choice and
judgement) rather than question 5 (objectives and limitations of financial
reporting) in Section C. This suggests students had a clear preference for
answering on these topics and so it is even more disappointing that the
quality of answers wasnt higher.
Stuart Turley
Course Convenor