Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
FEBRUARY 2009
And because the values and lessons reinforced by the hidden curriculum are
often the accepted status quo, it may be assumed that these hidden practices
and messages dont need to changeeven if they are contributing to
undesirable behaviors and results, whether its bullying, conflicts, or low
graduation and college-enrollment rates, for example.
Question 2
Briefly state the differences between a curriculum based on perennialism and a
curriculum based on progressivism.
*2.4, 2.6
Perennialism is the oldest method of learning and teaching and theories of this
method is still alive that learners need follow all the teaching, if not the learner
will not reach the goal.
Progressivism is the modern method that philosophers and educators try find out
the best ways of learning and teaching to be effectively in the modernization.
Teacher just gives them assignments and students will do the research and
spread the ideas what they have got from their research they will understand the
real life of living. For example, in Personal Growth and Development classes, for
the last six years ago, I have learned in this class. Professors just taught and
explained in the theories of knowledge and a little of assignment.
Progressivism students spend time and money for doing research. And
perennialism spends less time and less money or material. In contrast, students
of perennialism are less challenge in social activities because of the way of
teaching less activity in classroom
Question 3
What is the difference between formative evaluation and summative evaluation?
*8.2
Question 4
Why is it important that you evaluate a curriculum that has been implemented?
*8.1
Evaluation is the process of collecting data on a programme to determine its
value or worth with the aim of deciding whether to adopt, reject, or revise the
programme.
Programmes are evaluated to answer questions and concerns of various
parties.
The public want to know whether the curriculum implemented has achieved
its aims and objectives;
Teachers want to know whether what they are doing in the classroom is
effective;
The developer or planner wants to know how to improve the curriculum
product.
Question 5
Describe how teaching in the classroom will be different if the curriculum is based
on constructivism?
*3.4
Constructivism gives importance to learner as the agent who plays pivotal role in
the learning process, rather than trying to get the power from the teacher.
However within the constructivist paradigm, the stress is placed on the learner
than the teacher. It is the learner who interacts with his or her environment and
thus gains an understanding of its features and characteristics. The learner
constructs his own conceptualizations and finds his own solutions to problems,
mastering autonomy and independence. According to constructivism, learning is
the result of individual mental construction, whereby the learner learns by
matching new against given information and establishing meaningful
connection, rather than by internalising mere given information to regurgitate
later on.
Part B (10 Marks each) Answer 2 questions
Question 1
Ornstein and Hunkins (1998) proposed the following FIVE criteria that may be
used to guide what should be included in a curriculum: Significance, Utility,
Validiy (Credibility), Learnability, and Feasibility (consider constraints). Briefly
describe how you would use these five criteria when selecting content for a
curriculum that you are developing. (10 marks)
6.2.3
Significance: It is obvious that content selected should be significant. But, the
definition of significance varies with an individual,s beliefs. For example,
curriculum developers who favour subject matter designs think of significance in
terms of the concepts and principles of each subject area. Those who favour
learner-centred designs think of significance in terms of the needs and interests
of the learner. While those who favour a problem-centred design would regard
the problems and issues in society as significant. Taba (1962) further argues that
we should not just select content based on the cognitive aspects of learners, but
also on their affective dimensions.
Utility: Utility refers to the usefulness of content. This again depends on your
philosophical beliefs. If you subscribe to the subject-centred design, then you
believe that the content learned from the various subject areas will be useful in
the workplace. If you subscribe to the learner-centred design, then you will take
into consideration the needs and interests of learners which will enable them to
realise their potential to function effectively in the workplace. Alternatively, if you
subscribe to the problem-centred design, then you believe that learning about
societal issues will enable students to apply directly what they have learned to
their daily lives and the world of work.
Learnability: It may seem strange that anyone would select content that is not
learnable. Unfortunately, it does happen. Can you give examples of this
happening? For example, the content selected for a particular age group might
be too difficult and teachers need more time but insufficient time is allotted.
Eventually, teachers will end up rushing through the material and some students
left behind not understanding the content.
Feasibility: Educators who select content have to take into consideration the
constraints of time, expertise of staff, funding and other educational resources
that schools might face when implementing the curriculum. For example, the
number of days allotted for teaching may be insufficient to cover all the content
because schools have to allocate time for extra-curricular activities and other
schools events. Content selection has to be considered within the context of
existing reality of economics and the role of the government.
Question 2
According to McNeil (1990), curriculum change is a complex and difficult
process requiring careful planning, adequate time, funding, support of
teachers, administrators and the community.
(a) Suggest 4 possible reasons why teachers may resist the
implementation of a curriculum. How would you overcome such
resistance?
7.4
Reason 1:
People resist because they do not understand they simply do not follow what is
being introduced. They do not understand where they are going. They are not
clear as to what is required of them.
Overcome:
The key is communication. You have to explain to them Why. You have to
answer the Why, What, When, How and Where questions. Remember, the
effectiveness of communication is not the message sent but of the message
received
Reason 2:
People resist because of lack of ownership Individuals will not accept change if
they consider it coming from outside or imposed on them. Unfortunately, most
curriculum reform efforts are initiated from the outside which may be at the
national, state or district level.
Overcome:
You have to convince teachers that even though it comes from the outside, their
view and opinions have been considered at the planning and design stages of
curriculum development. Involve teachers in exploring the relevance of the new
curriculum and give them the freedom to explore the new skills needed for
utilising or implementing the curriculum. This will get them to feel that they are an
important part of the curriculum implementation process.
Reason 3:
People resist if they do not have the competencies to cope with the changes It
is natural for persons to resist if they do not have the knowledge and skills to
cope with the changes. Nobody wants to be told that they are incompetent. There
is the likelihood that the implementation of the new curriculum has been rushed
or due to budgetary constraints, the training period has been greatly reduced and
teachers are not adequately equipped.
Overcome:
Adequate time and resources have to be set aside for the training of teachers
involved in implementing the new curriculum.
Reason 4:
People resist if there is a lack of incentives or benefits If teachers are
unconvinced that the new programme will make things better for students (in
terms of learning) or themselves (such as greater recognition, respect or reward),
they are likely to resist the suggested change.
Overcome:
Make sure that teachers who are actively involved in curriculum change are
rewarded. The reward need not necessarily be financial, but their efforts need to
be given due recognition.
Reason 5:
People resist if they do not have the time to engage with the change Teachers
find it difficult having to juggle between bringing about change handling their
current responsibilities. Focusing their energy on change activities, may run the
risk of neglecting their current responsibilities.
Overcome:
Lighten their workload so they can participate in the change. Reprioritise their
work. Do not expect people to have the energy to change when this means
failing on the tasks for which they are held responsible.
(b) Suggest ways of getting parents and the community to accept a new
curriculum.
7.6.4
One way of getting parents and community to accept a new curriculum is to
organise workshops for them focusing on the new curriculum. The workshops
should be designed to help them better understand the content and philosophy of
the new curriculum. Parents and community need an opportunity to share their
concerns and voice their support in an open forum. These workshops should be
conducted by teachers so that they may explain what is really going on in the
classroom.
The next step is the selection of educational experiences which enable the
attainment of the stipulated objectives. The learning experiences have to take
into account the previous experiences learners bring to a situation. The learning
experiences will have to be selected based on what is known about human
learning and human development.
Next, Tyler talked about the organisation and sequencing of these learning
experiences. He emphasised that the experiences should be properly organised
so as to enhance learning and suggested that ideas, concept, values and skills
be used as organising elements woven into the curriculum. These elements
would serve as organisers linking content within a particular subject (eg. history,
economics, science) and also determine the method of instruction or delivery of
content.
As the world moves towards becoming a global village, society will become even
more diverse with people bringing in new values, new languages and a new way
of life. It was hoped that a national identity would evolve from these varied
attributes, but in reality the culture of the majority became dominant. So, it may
be necessary to have different programmes, different pedagogical approaches,
flexible curriculum and even varied educational environments to address the
needs of all students.