Sei sulla pagina 1di 1249

Mainstream Media Manipulation, Societal Engineering &

Government Propaganda

This is a collection of articles which cover the ways in which we are lied to and manipulated
through the mass media - and not just via the 'news' but by way of television 'programming'
advertising, music, films, computer games - pop culture.

This all works towards a dumbed-down population - an engineered society. But this can only work
if the "sheeple" are not educated as to how the plan works.

You will also see articles here about both the drawn-out demise of establishment media, along
with reports on the rise of independent media.

Facts You Need To know About Syria & Syrian President Bashar Al Assad Fields
Questions From French Media And Defends Alternative Media
January 12 2017 | From: AustralianNationalReview / 21stCenturyWire

The Assad family belongs to the tolerant Islam of Alawid orientation.


Syrian women have the same rights as men to study, health and education.

Syrian women are not forced to wear the burqa. The Sharia (Islamic law) is unconstitutional.

Related: Ron Paul on Aleppo Aftermath: We Need a New Syria Policy

Syria is the only Arab country with a secular constitution and does not tolerate Islamic extremist movements.

Roughly 10% of the Syrian population belongs to one of the many Christian denominations, all fully integrated in
Syrian political and social life.

In other Arab countries the Christian population is less than 1% due to sustained hostility.
Syria has banned genetically modified (GMO) seeds, stating his decision was made in order to preserve human
health,

Syria has an opening to Western society and culture like no other Arab country.

Its media and universities openly debate the global power elites influence in things. This means that they fully
grasp the fact that real power in the West lies not in the White House but rather with the complex and powerful grid
of elite think-tanks and central banks.

Throughout history there have been five popes of Syrian origin. Religious tolerance is unique in the area.

Prior to the current civil war, Syria was one of the only peaceful countries in the area, having avoided major wars
or internal conflicts.

Syria was the only country that admitted Iraqi refugees without any social, political or religious discrimination.

Syria clearly and unequivocally opposes Zionism and the Israel government.

Following a massive oil find in Syrias Golan Heights, occupied by Israel since 1967, Netanyahu recently asked
Obama to recognize its annexation of the territory. To consolidate its hold, plans are afoot to quadruple Israeli
settler numbers to 100,000.

And The Most Two Important Points:


Syria is one of the only countries in the Middle East without debts to the International Monetary Fund (Pre-
invasion Libya & Iran the only others)

Syria is the only Mediterranean country which remains the owner of its oil company, with an oil reserve of 2,500
million barrels, the operation of which has avoided privatization and is reserved exclusively for state-owned
enterprises.

So now ask yourself, why are we truly attempting to overthrow yet another government?

What are we hoping to fix here?

If the recent invasions and illegal assassinations of Presidents like Qaddafi and Saddam have taught us anything, it should
be the understanding of the blowback effect of such lawless actions by the West and the vacuum of chaos that always
supersedes it.

Debt Conquer. Invent a reason to invade and destroy, then offer $Trillions in IMF funding to rebuild conveniently
paid back by control of your oil fields and the free access to build gas pipelines to the west.

Related Articles:

Bolivian actress Carla Ortiz exposes what went wrong with Western media coverage of Syrian conflict

Syria Story Is A Fools Paradise

Western Media Credibility In Free Fall Collapse: Case In Point: UN Peace Council: The US Media Is Lying To The
American people. The War In Syria Is Not A Civil War, It's A Proxy Invasion By The United States

Syria: Attack On Aid Convoy Kills Twenty, Destroys Aid, And Obliterates US War Crimes In Support Of ISIS-Daesh
Terror Group?

I Am A Syrian Living In Syria: It Was Never A Revolution Nor A Civil War: The Terrorists Are Sent By Your
Government

The Boy In The Ambulance: US State Dept-Funded Groups Behind Latest 'Iconic Image' Designed To Demonize
Russia And Encourage Further Bloodshed In Syria

Checkmate! U.S. Loses Syria & Turkey; Erdogan Will Visit Putin + John McCain Is Directly Responsible For ISIS
Clinton Email Reveals: Google Sought Overthrow Of Syria's Assad

In Syria, If You Cant Find Moderates, Dress Up Some Extremists

Paris-Syria Timeline Of Terror

The End Of The New World Order As Russia Shifts Balance Of Power: Russia's Syrian Operation To Smash
Terrorists, End Tyranny Of Banking Elite

Secret Pentagon Report Reveals US "Created" ISIS As A "Tool" To Overthrow Syria's President Assad & War is
Peace: US Needs External Enemy to Ensure Internal Unity

Syrian President Bashar Al Assad Fields Questions From French Media And Defends
Alternative Media

Recently we reported on the targeting of a French delegation to Syria, led by politician, Thierry
Mariani, by the US backed FSA (Free Syrian Army) Company 23.

Aleppo airport was shelled by this group of primarily US supported moderate rebels led by a defected Syrian
Arab Army colonel, Hassan Rajoob, just prior to the planned take off of the plane ferrying the delegation back to
Damascus.

Related: US, UK Paid White Helmets Help Al Qaeda Blocking Water To 5 Million Syrians

The delegation then met with Syrian President, Bashar Al Assad, on the 9th January 2017. Following the meeting, President
Assad met with and fielded questions from French media.
Related: US Backed Moderate Rebels Target French Delegation in Aleppo

We always have hopes that the next (French) administration, or government, or president will want to deal with
the reality, to disconnect themselves from the disconnected policy from our reality. That is our hope..and they can
work for the interests of the French people.

The question now, after six years, as a French citizen, do you feel safer? I dont think the answer is yes. The
immigration problem, has it made the situation in your country better? []

This is the question the next administration, government, president should deal with in order to deal with our reality
not what is in their imagination as has been happening for the last six years.

(Fillons) rhetoric regarding the terrorists, or lets say the priority to fight the terrorists and not meddling in the affairs
of other countries are welcome, but we have to be cautious, because what we have learned in this region, during
the last few years, is that many officials would say something and do the opposite.

I am not saying M Fillon would do this, I hope not, but we have to wait and see because there is no contact. But so
far, what he is saying, if it is implemented, that will be very good.

If I want to send (a message to French politicians) I would say the self evident thing, that we have to work for the
interests of the Syrian citizens, and for the last six years the situation is going in the opposite direction. The French
politics harmed the French interests.

For the French people, I would say the mainstream media has failed in most of the west, the narrative has been
debunked because of the reality and you have the alternative media, you have to look for the truth.

Truth was the main victim of the events in the Middle East, including Syria.

I would ask any citizen in France, please search for the reality, for the real information, through the alternative
media. When they search for this information, they can be more effective, in dealing with their government, or at
least not allowing some politicians to base their politics on lies.

Related: Who Are Syria's White Helmets?

US Deep State In Deep Trouble + A Deeper Understanding Of Technocracy


January 11 2017 | From: Sputnik / JonRappoport

US ruling power is in deep trouble because there are growing signs that the mass of citizens are
no longer beholden to the supposed authority residing in Washington.
Once the legitimacy of would-be authorities begins to collapse in the eyes of the people, then profound political
change is in the offing, as history shows us through countless empires that came and went often ignominiously.

Related: Creeping Technocratic Dictatorship: Google Can Access Medical Records; Microsoft Storing Data On Your
DNA

"The so-called American Deep State comprising the military-intelligence apparatus and its operatives in the
political and media establishment has put its credibility on the line over allegations of Russian interference in the
US elections."

Those allegations are threadbare, indeed baseless, despite concerted, overweening attempts by the Deep State to conjure
up something of substance.

Related: US Intelligence 'Laid Itself Open to Ridicule' by Accusing Russia of Hacker Attacks

The latest high-level intelligence report from the CIA, NSA, FBI and other US spy agencies on alleged Russian cyber
hacking may have wowed President Barack Obama, various members of Congress and the corporate-controlled news
media. Not so for ordinary Americans. Among rank-and-file citizens the reaction has been underwhelming to say the least.

And that should be a matter of anxiety for the ruling establishment. If the people can no longer be commanded,
then the whole foundation for power begins to erode like a sandcastle.

As a New York Times report put it:

"Whats the big deal? asks Trumps supporters on Russian hacking report.
Trump is quite a hit in Russia - here he is on sugar packaging in a Russian store

Related: How Trump May Have Just Caused Russia to Fall Back in Love with the USA

Among ordinary voters far removed from the Washington Beltway Bubble the consensus is one of derision towards the
once-revered US intelligence community.

"Sore losers, sour grapes, crybabies and absurd were just some of the disbelieving responses from ordinary
folks about claims that Russian agents directed by Russian President Vladimir Putin had tipped the US November
election in favor of Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton."

I dont believe the [US] intel report, said one man in Louisiana. Why is everybody so afraid of Russia? Im not
against Putin.

Related: WikiLeaks: US Intel Report on Russia Hacking 'Has Poor Sourcing and No Evidence'

Another man, a retired US air force officer, added:

"From the parts of the [US intel] report Ive seen it seems silly.

President-elect Trump, once again, seems more in tune with the real, pressing concerns of common citizens.

He emerged from his so-called briefing by US intelligence chiefs last Friday and pointedly refused to join the Washington
blowhards accusing Russia of an act of war.

Trump in fact followed up with a comment that it was only a stupid person would not want to have good relations with
Russia.

This was not the response that the spooks wanted from Trump. The CIA and their surrogates in the Obama administration,
Congress and the media were building up the US intel report like a witch-hunt against anyone who dares to dissent from the
allegations of Russian cyber interference.

Unlike warmongering Congress members such as John McCain and Lyndsey Graham, Trump has not jumped on the
bandwagon to demonize Russia.

"And the thing is that people beyond the thrall of the Deep State centered in Washington appear to agree with
Trump.

At a time of immense social challenges from poverty, unemployment, financial indebtedness, deteriorating
infrastructure and public services, and so on, a US policy of hostility towards Russia seems like an alien
distraction. A contemptible waste of priority and resources, not to say a reckless drumbeat to war between nuclear
powers."

Shocker: 'Proof' of Russia's Trump Support Was Compiled During Obama's Election

The US intelligence agencies, aided by the Obama White House and mainstream media, tried to muster gravitas to play its
Russian card against Trump.

But Trump and the popular sentiment out there are not responding in the deferential manner expected by the
spooks.

In fact, despite sensationalist headlines in the mainstream media about Putin ordering an influence campaign to help Trump
win the election, the US intelligence agencies are now in real danger of being exposed as ridiculous liars.
The collapse of the US establishment has been underway for sometime, but lately the momentum has quickened with the
election of Trump and the mainstream medias penchant for fake narratives.

Last week the Washington disgraced itself by running a story about Russia hacking into the US electric, a story which was
quickly exposed as fake news.

On the latest US intel report, as well as Trump and ordinary Americans, many observers from around the world were taken
aback by the amateurish dearth of evidence and generally low quality of analysis. Independent cyber security experts,
including US-based ones, poured scorn on the claims against Russia.

Related: US Readiness to Throw Rocks at Russia Marks Need for Policy U-Turn Ex-Adviser to Trump

The US spy agencies claim that they have supporting evidence that Russia hacked Hillary Clintons emails, but they say,
unconvincingly, that they cant disclose the information in order to protect sensitive sources and methods. Such a conjuring
trick just makes the US spooks and the subservient news media look even more ridiculous.
A major giveaway was the disproportionately huge focus that the US intelligence report devoted to trying to discredit
Russian news media outlets, RT and Sputnik.

The report claims that the news services are part of the Kremlins influence campaign and then cites its own ropey
rationale as evidence that Russia hacked the US election.

If thats the best that Americas national security guardians can come up with then we can be sure their case against
Russia is null and void.

There was a time in the American past when shadowy, unelected elites could control society through monopolistic, servile
media and servile politicians kowtowing to their supposed authority.

There was also a naive belief among people that the secret services were defending the nations best interests.

Not any more alas. People have got wise to the massive manipulation and criminality of such shadowy powers who
orchestrate wars and regime changes all around the world for the narrow benefit of elite corporate power.

Ordinary Americans pay with their lives and livelihoods for the machinations of the ruling cabal.

"The Deep State intel chiefs may have been fawned over by Obama, Congress and the media in their outlandish
claims of Russian subversion. But growing numbers of ordinary people in the US and around the world can see
through the lies and blatant agenda of hostility towards Russia an insane hostility that only serves the elite
interests of the Deep State."

The once feared, and revered, US Deep State is now facing a deep dilemma and maybe even an existential crisis. For it
knows deep down that its erstwhile credibility and authority are shot to pieces.
Down through history, the American rulers got away with their charade of inciting wars and conflicts through false flags and
contrived catastrophes: the not-so-secret Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, the fabricated Gulf of Tonkin incident that
escalated the US genocidal war on Vietnam, the dubious 9/11 terror attacks and Iraqs non-existent weapons of mass
destruction, to mention just a few.

This same warmongering American ruling class want another arms race, Pentagon-pumping Cold War with Russia. But this
time they have played a card that is all too evidently blank. The US spooks and their elitist establishment know that Trump,
the American people, Russia and the rest of world all know that they have nothing to offer.

No credibility, no morals and no authority, the US Deep State is in deep trouble.

A Deeper Understanding Of Technocracy

Technocracy is the basic agenda and plan for ruling global society from above, so we need to
understand it from several angles.
Consider a group of enthusiastic forward-looking engineers in the early 20th century. They work for a company that
has a contract to manufacture a locomotive.

Related: Technocracy: A Scientific Dictatorship

This is a highly complex piece of equipment. On one level, workers are required to make the components to spec. Then they
must put them all together. These tasks are formidable. On another level, various departments of the company must
coordinate their efforts. This is also viewed as a technological job. Organizing is considered a technology.

When the locomotive is finished and delivered, and when it runs on its tracks and pulls a train, a great and inspiring victory is
won.

And thenthe engineers begin to think about the implications. Suppose the locomotive was society itself? Suppose society
was the finished product? Couldnt society be put together in a coordinated fashion?

And couldnt the technology of organizing things be utilized for the job?
Related: "Smart City" Is Really Government Spying On An Unimaginable Scale

Why bother with endlessly arguing and lying politicians? Why should they be in charge? Isnt that an obvious losing
proposition? Of course it is.

But engineers could lay out and build a future society that would benefit all people. Hunger, disease, and poverty could be
wiped out. Eliminating them would be part of the uncompromising blueprint.

This insight hit engineers and technicians like a ton of bricks. Of course! All societies had been failures for the
same reason: the wrong people were in charge.

Armed with this new understanding, engineers of every stripe began to see what was needed. A revolution in thinking about
societal organization. Science was the new king. And science would rule.

Of course, for an engineered world to work, certain decisions would have to be made about the role of the
individual. Every individual. You couldnt have an air-tight plan if every human were free to pursue his own
objectives.

Too many variables. Too much confusion. Too much conflict. Well, that problem could be solved. The individuals
actions would be tailored to fit the coordinated operations of the planned society.
Related: Technocracy: evolution told as a fairy tale

The individual would be inserted into a pre-ordained slot. He would be one of the components of the locomotive. His life
would be connected to other lives to produce an exemplary shape.

Yes, this could imply a few problems, but those problems could be worked out. They would have to be worked out, because
the overriding goal was the forming of a world organization.

What would you do if one bolt (an individual human) in one wheel of a locomotive was the wrong size? You would
go back and correct the error. You would re-make the bolt.

Among sincere technocrats, the overall vision superseded the glaring problems.

Butother people entered the game. High-echelon Globalists saw technocracy as a system they could use to control the
population. Control was their goal. Period. What happened to the individual in the process was of no concern to them. The
individual had freedom or he didnt have freedom, and the Globalists overtly intended to wipe out that freedom.

Erasing hunger, poverty, illness? Nonsense.

For the Globalists, those realities would be exacerbated. Sick, weak, and debilitated people were easier to rule and
control and manage.

Essentially, a vastly misguided vision of a future technocratic utopia was hijacked. Something bad was made much worse.

In a nutshell, this is the history of technocracy. A locomotive is a society? No.


That was the first fatally flawed idea. Everything that followed was increasingly psychotic.

Unfortunately, many people in our world believe in Globalism, if you could call a partial vague view a legitimate belief.

They dreamily float on all the propaganda cover stories - greatest good for the greatest number of people; no more
poverty; equality of sharing; reducing the carbon footprint; a green economy; sustainable development;
international cooperation; engineering production and consumption of goods and services for the betterment of
everyone; and all of this delivered from a central platform of altruistic guides.

If you track down the specifics that sit under these pronouncements, you discover you discover a warped system of
planning that delivers misery and de facto slavery to the global population.
Related: Fabian Socialist Society

The collective utopia turns out to be a sham. Waking up is hard to do? Breaking up is hard to do? They must be
done.

A workable technological fix is a very nice achievement when the project is a machine. But transferring that glow of victory to
the whole of society is an illusion. Anything that calls itself education would tackle the illusion as the first order of business.

Related Articles:

Minds Like Machines

Robert Steele: The Soft Coup Collapses

Military Coups, Regime Change: The CIA Has Interfered In Over 81 Foreign Elections

As We Move Into 2017: The Cracks in the Empire are Here How will the U.S. Empire Dissolve?

The Op: Unelected Agents Now Infiltrating Critical Infrastructures

Obama Regime Moves To Federalize Elections

Editing Reality: Former Employees Admit Facebook Censors Conservative News

American Pravda: How The CIA Invented "Conspiracy Theories"


January 10 2017 | From: UNZ / ActivistPost / Various

With the sudden, bizarre rise of the Fake News accusations throughout the entire Corporate
Media megaphone and the equally bizarre and totally unsubstantiated CIA allegations that the
Russians had stolen the election for Donald Trump, this topic is highly pertinent.
A year or two ago, I saw the much-touted science fiction film Interstellar, and although the plot wasnt any good,
one early scene was quite amusing. For various reasons, the American government of the future claimed that our
Moon Landings of the late 1960s had been faked, a trick aimed at winning the Cold War by bankrupting Russia into
fruitless space efforts of its own.

Related: Trump Plans to Shrink, Reorganize CIA, Other Intel Agencies

This inversion of historical reality was accepted as true by nearly everyone, and those few people who claimed that Neil
Armstrong had indeed set foot on the Moon were universally ridiculed as crazy conspiracy theorists. This seems a realistic
portrayal of human nature to me.

Obviously, a large fraction of everything described by our government leaders or presented in the pages of our most
respectable newspapers - from the 9/11 attacks to the most insignificant local case of petty urban corruption - could
objectively be categorized as a conspiracy theory but such words are never applied.

Instead, use of that highly loaded phrase is reserved for those theories, whether plausible or fanciful, that do not
possess the endorsement stamp of establishmentarian approval.
Related: The 70 Greatest Conspiracy Theories in Pop-Culture History

Put another way, there are good conspiracy theories and bad conspiracy theories, with the former being the ones
promoted by pundits on mainstream television shows and hence never described as such.

Ive sometimes joked with people that if ownership and control of our television stations and other major media
outlets suddenly changed, the new information regime would require only a few weeks of concerted effort to totally
invert all of our most famous conspiracy theories in the minds of the gullible American public.

The notion that nineteen Arabs armed with box-cutters hijacked several jetliners, easily evaded our NORAD air defenses,
and reduced several landmark buildings to rubble would soon be universally ridiculed as the most preposterous conspiracy
theory ever to have gone straight from the comic books into the minds of the mentally ill, easily surpassing the absurd lone
gunman theory of the JFK assassination.

Even without such changes in media control, huge shifts in American public beliefs have frequently occurred in the recent
past, merely on the basis of implied association.

In the initial weeks and months following the 2001 attacks, every American media organ was enlisted to denounce and vilify
Osama Bin Laden, the purported Islamicist master-mind, as our greatest national enemy, with his bearded visage endlessly
appearing on television and in print, soon becoming one of the most recognizable faces in the world.
But as the Bush Administration and its key media allies prepared a war against Iraq, the images of the Burning Towers were
instead regularly juxtaposed with mustachioed photos of dictator Saddam Hussein, Bin Ladens arch-enemy.

As a consequence, by the time we attacked Iraq in 2003, polls revealed that some 70% of the American
public believed that Saddam was personally involved in the destruction of our World Trade Center.

By that date I dont doubt that many millions of patriotic but low-information Americans would have angrily denounced and
vilified as a crazy conspiracy theorist anyone with the temerity to suggest that Saddam had not been behind 9/11, despite
almost no one in authority having ever explicitly made such a fallacious claim.

These factors of media manipulation were very much in my mind a couple of years ago when I stumbled across a short but
fascinating book published by the University of Texas academic press. The author of Conspiracy Theory in Americawas
Prof. Lance deHaven-Smith, a former president of the Florida Political Science Association.
Based on an important FOIA disclosure, the books headline revelation was that the CIA was very likely responsible for the
widespread introduction of conspiracy theory as a term of political abuse, having orchestrated that development as a
deliberate means of influencing public opinion.

During the mid-1960s there had been increasing public skepticism about the Warren Commission findings that a lone
gunman, Lee Harvey Oswald, had been solely responsible for President Kennedys assassination, and growing suspicions
that top-ranking American leaders had also been involved.

So as a means of damage control, the CIA distributed a secret memo to all its field offices requesting that they
enlist their media assets in efforts to ridicule and attack such critics as irrational supporters of conspiracy
theories.

Soon afterward, there suddenly appeared statements in the media making those exact points, with some of the wording,
arguments, and patterns of usage closely matching those CIA guidelines.

The result was a huge spike in the pejorative use of the phrase, which spread throughout the American media, with the
residual impact continueing right down to the present day. Thus, there is considerable evidence in support of this particular
conspiracy theory explaining the widespread appearance of attacks on conspiracy theories in the public media.
But although the CIA appears to have effectively manipulated public opinion in order to transform the phrase conspiracy
theory into a powerful weapon of ideological combat, the author also describes how the necessary philosophical ground
had actually been prepared a couple of decades earlier.

Around the time of the Second World War, an important shift in political theory caused a huge decline in the respectability of
any conspiratorial explanation of historical events.

For decades prior to that conflict, one of our most prominent scholars and public intellectuals had been historian Charles
Beard, whose influential writings had heavily focused on the harmful role of various elite conspiracies in shaping
American policy for the benefit of the few at the expense of the many, with his examples ranging from the earliest
history of the United States down to the nations entry into WWI.

Obviously, researchers never claimed that all major historical events had hidden causes, but it was widely accepted that
some of them did, and attempting to investigate those possibilities was deemed a perfectly acceptable academic enterprise.

However, Beard was a strong opponent of American entry into the Second World War, and he was marginalized in the years
that followed, even prior to his death in 1948. Many younger public intellectuals of a similar bent also suffered the same fate,
or were even purged from respectability and denied any access to the mainstream media.

At the same time, the totally contrary perspectives of two European political philosophers, Karl Popper and Leo Strauss,
gradually gained ascendancy in American intellectual circles, and their ideas became dominant in public life.

Popper, the more widely influential, presented broad, largely theoretical objections to the very possibility of important
conspiracies ever existing, suggesting that these would be implausibly difficult to implement given the fallibility of human
agents; what might appear a conspiracy actually amounted to individual actors pursuing their narrow aims.

Even more importantly, he regarded conspiratorial beliefs as an extremely dangerous social malady, a major contributing
factor to the rise of Nazism and other deadly totalitarian ideologies.

His own background as an individual of Jewish ancestry who had fled Austria in 1937 surely contributed to the depth of his
feelings on these philosophical matters.
Meanwhile, Strauss, a founding figure in modern neo-conservative thought, was equally harsh in his attacks upon
conspiracy analysis, but for polar-opposite reasons.

In his mind, elite conspiracies were absolutely necessary and beneficial, a crucial social defense against anarchy or
totalitarianism, but their effectiveness obviously depended upon keeping them hidden from the prying eyes of the ignorant
masses.

His main problem with conspiracy theories was not that they were always false, but they might often be true, and therefore
their spread was potentially disruptive to the smooth functioning of society.

So as a matter of self-defense, elites needed to actively suppress or otherwise undercut the unauthorized
investigation of suspected conspiracies.

Even for most educated Americans, theorists such as Beard, Popper, and Strauss are probably no more than vague names
mentioned in textbooks, and that was certainly true in my own case. But while the influence of Beard seems to have largely
disappeared in elite circles, the same is hardly true of his rivals.

Popper probably ranks as one of the founders of modern liberal thought, with an individual as politically influential as left-
liberal financier George Soros claiming to be his intellectual disciple.
Related: George Soros World is Falling Apart, Blames Everyone but Himself

Meanwhile, the neo-conservative thinkers who have totally dominated the Republican Party and the Conservative
Movement for the last couple of decades often proudly trace their ideas back to Strauss.

So, through a mixture of Popperian and Straussian thinking, the traditional American tendency to regard elite
conspiracies as a real but harmful aspect of our society was gradually stigmatized as either paranoid or politically
dangerous, laying the conditions for its exclusion from respectable discourse.

By 1964, this intellectual revolution had largely been completed, as indicated by the overwhelmingly positive reaction to the
famous article by political scientist Richard Hofstadter critiquing the so-called paranoid style in American politics, which he
denounced as the underlying cause of widespread popular belief in implausible conspiracy theories.

To a considerable extent, he seemed to be attacking straw men, recounting and ridiculing the most outlandish conspiratorial
beliefs, while seeming to ignore the ones that had been proven correct.
For example, he described how some of the more hysterical anti-Communists claimed that tens of thousands of Red
Chinese troops were hidden in Mexico, preparing an attack on San Diego, while he failed to even acknowledge that for
years Communist spies had indeed served near the very top of the U.S. government.

Not even the most conspiratorially minded individual suggests that all alleged conspiracies are true, merely that some of
them might be.

Most of these shifts in public sentiment occurred before I was born or when I was a very young child, and my own views
were shaped by the rather conventional media narratives that I absorbed. Hence, for nearly my entire life, I always
automatically dismissed all of the so-called conspiracy theories as ridiculous, never once even considering that any of
them might possibly be true.

To the extent that I ever thought about the matter, my reasoning was simple and based on what seemed like good, solid
common sense. Any conspiracy responsible for some important public event must surely have many separate moving
parts to it, whether actors or actions taken, let us say numbering at least 100 or more.

Now given the imperfect nature of all attempts at concealment, it would surely be impossible for all of these to be kept
entirely hidden. So even if a conspiracy were initially 95% successful in remaining undetected, five major clues
would still be left in plain sight for investigators to find.
And once the buzzing cloud of journalists noticed these, such blatant evidence of conspiracy would certainly attract an
additional swarm of energetic investigators, tracing those items back to their origins, with more pieces gradually being
uncovered until the entire cover-up likely collapsed.

Even if not all the crucial facts were ever determined, at least the simple conclusion that there had indeed been some sort of
conspiracy would quickly become established.

However, there was a tacit assumption in my reasoning, one that I have since decided was entirely false.
Obviously, many potential conspiracies either involve powerful governmental officials or situations in which their
disclosure would represent a source of considerable embarrassment to such individuals.

But I had always assumed that even if government failed in its investigatory role, the dedicated bloodhounds of the Fourth
Estate would invariably come through, tirelessly seeking truth, ratings, and Pulitzers. However, once I gradually began
realizing that the media was merely Our American Pravda and perhaps had been so for decades, I suddenly recognized
the flaw in my logic.
If those five - or ten or twenty or fifty - initial clues were simply ignored by the media, whether through laziness,
incompetence, or much less venial sins, then there would be absolutely nothing to prevent successful conspiracies from
taking place and remaining undetected, perhaps even the most blatant and careless ones.

In fact, I would extend this notion to a general principle. Substantial control of the media is almost always an absolute
prerequisite for any successful conspiracy, the greater the degree of control the better.

So when weighing the plausibility of any conspiracy, the first matter to investigate is who controls the local media
and to what extent.

Let us consider a simple thought-experiment. For various reasons these days, the entire American media is extraordinarily
hostile to Russia, certainly much more so than it ever was toward the Communist Soviet Union during the 1970s and 1980s.

Hence I would argue that the likelihood of any large-scale Russian conspiracy taking place within the operative
zone of those media organs is virtually nil.
Indeed, we are constantly bombarded with stories of alleged Russian conspiracies that appear to be false
positives, dire allegations seemingly having little factual basis or actually being totally ridiculous.

Meanwhile, even the crudest sort of anti-Russian conspiracy might easily occur without receiving any serious mainstream
media notice or investigation.

This argument may be more than purely hypothetical. A crucial turning point in Americas renewed Cold War against Russia
was the passage of the 2012 Magnitsky Act by Congress, punitively targeting various supposedly corrupt Russian officials
for their alleged involvement in the illegal persecution and death of an employee of Bill Browder, an American hedge-fund
manager with large Russian holdings.

However, theres actually quite a bit of evidence that it was Browder himself who was actually the mastermind and
beneficiary of the gigantic corruption scheme, while his employee was planning to testify against him and was therefore
fearful of his life for that reason.
Naturally, the American media has provided scarcely a single mention of these remarkable revelations regarding what might
amount to a gigantic Magnitsky Hoax of geopolitical significance.

To some extent the creation of the Internet and the vast proliferation of alternative media outlets, including my own small
webzine, have somewhat altered this depressing picture.

So it is hardly surprising that a very substantial fraction of the discussion dominating these Samizdat-like publications
concerns exactly those subjects regularly condemned as crazy conspiracy theories by our mainstream media organs.

Such unfiltered speculation must surely be a source of considerable irritation and worry to government officials who have
long relied upon the complicity of their tame media organs to allow their serious misdeeds to pass unnoticed and
unpunished.

Indeed, several years ago a senior Obama Administration official argued that the free discussion of various
conspiracy theories on the Internet was so potentially harmful that government agents should be recruited to
cognitively infiltrate and disrupt them, essentially proposing a high-tech version of the highly controversial
Cointelpro operations undertaken by J. Edgar Hoovers FBI.
Until just a few years ago Id scarcely even heard of Charles Beard, once ranked among the towering figures of 20th century
American intellectual life. But the more Ive discovered the number of serious crimes and disasters that have completely
escaped substantial media scrutiny, the more I wonder what other matters may still remain hidden.

So perhaps Beard was correct all along in recognizing the respectability of conspiracy theories, and we should return to his
traditional American way of thinking, notwithstanding endless conspiratorial propaganda campaigns by the CIA and others to
persuade us that we should dismiss such notions without any serious consideration.

Related: Conspiracy Theorist Max Spiers Found Dead Days After Texting His Mother to Investigate if Anything
Happened to Him

150 Terabytes! Norway Busts Largest Dark Web, Child Porn Networks In History - US,
UK Media Ignore Story
January 9 2017 | From: TheNewNationalist / IllegalNews / Various

Its one of the largest child sex abuse cases in history. A year-long special investigation called
Operation Darkroom resulted in the seizure of 150 terabytes of data material in the form of
photos, movies and chat logs containing atrocities against children as young as infancy,
Norwegian police announced at a news conference in late November.

Among the 51 perpetrators said to be involved, 20 have been arrested. The list of the accused includes highly
educated individuals, including two former or current elected politicians, one teacher, a lawyer and a police
officer.

Related: Massive Evidence Emerges That Satanic Voodoo Doughnuts of Portland May Be Heavily Involved in Child
Sex Trafficking

Yet, English-language media both in Europe and stateside in the U.S. have ignored the story.

As Norwegian news publication Tadens Krav reports, the material shows penetration of toddlers, children being tied,
children who have sex with animals and children who have sex with other children. One of the accused men had a pregnant
girlfriend and planned with another to commit offenses against the child when it was born, police said.

Some of the accused performed abuses directly online, including atrocities against their own children. Police stressed that
the case involves a network. The investigation is ongoing.
Related: Has John Key been Implicated in the #PizzaGate Child Sex Trafficking Ring?

So while the U.S. media busied itself with its campaign of denial, lies and cover ups involving Pizzagate and fake news,
this huge child sex abuse story broke in Norway. The story did appear on Associated Press wire, but did anyone run it?

The infamous crime syndicate rags The Washington Post had the story briefly on Nov. 20 but has since taken it offline, as
did The New York Times. German state news group Deutsche Welle and UK Independent provided a brief story, and
Sputnik ran a more thorough article. Fox News still has this up but would a thinking person even call this coverage?

It is a truly remarkable story with global implications. Take special note of the shocking file size - 150 terabytes! Its too
horrible to even contemplate. To put this into context, the Library of Congress holds about 600 terabytes of Web data. Its
online archive grows at a rate of about 5 terabytes per month.

Also note the horrifically sadistic nature of the material seized. And note that police are investigating the reach
as worldwide, which means it involves a massive scale of evil filth. But nobody in the criminally compliant
mainstream media thinks its newsworthy.

Adding insult to public-service journalism injury, the crime syndicate has shifted gears and rolled out entertainment media to
mock and lecture you. If you can stomach it, watch Stephen Colbert (below) reading unnaturally off of a script about fake
news, Pizzagate and Michael Flynn.

He engages in the same straw-man arguments we covered in our critique of the The New York Times skuldruggery. Colbert
puts forth all the usual deceptions involving Hillary Clinton, tunnels and basements before declaring Pizzagate was politically
motivated and fake. When you see this particular narrative, know that you are being gas-lighted and diverted.

Yeah, laugh it up, fellas. The New Nationalist (TNN) has said from the beginning that Pizzagate is a poor term. We prefer
pedogate. This goes far beyond just one perv hangout pizzeria. And, of course, it transcends the political spectrum,which
explains why there is no investigation.

The assertion that Pizzagate fake news is right-wing inspired is a scam. Perhaps its because of the word nationalist in
the name of our website that the media keeps citing us in its narratives.

And just below our masthead, it very clearly states that TNN is third position, meaning beyond the Hegalian left-right
dialectic.

We are true humanists, who insist on protecting children from criminals.


Related Articles:

Hillary Clinton Connected To Norway Pedophile Ring

Homosexual George Bush Pedophile Sex Ring and Blackmail of Congress

Clintons, Soros Implicated In Norway

5 Questions for Gareth Cheapest Pizza Morgan and his Opportunities Party #TOPNZ

Hollywood Paedophiles Exposed

California just decriminalized child prostitutes beginning Jan 1 legalization stirs outrage
Epic! Hero Uber Driver Saves Little Girl from Sex Slavery Then Praises Trump

State Department & Jeffrey Epstein Tied to Child Trafficking Operation

Pope Francis proclaims zero tolerance to child molesters

Trafficking and Jeffrey Epstein w/ Conchita Sarnoff

Largest Pedophile Ring In History, 70,000 Members, Heads Of State, The Rats Scramble

Nicole Kidmans Father Dies Amid Pedophile, Child Murder Ring Allegations

Reddit Bans "Pizzagate" - "We Don't Want Witchhunts On Our Site" + #Pizzagate Was Merely Code For Child Sex
Trafficking

Pizzagate: How 4Chan Uncovered The Sick World Of Washingtons Occult Elite + The Clinton Child Sex
Trafficking Network: A Comprehensive Guide

Satanic Pedophilia Network Exposed In Australia - It Starts At The TOP, Just Like In The USA And UK

Retired Head Of Los Angeles FBI Tells All: Illuminati, Satanism, Pedophile Rings

PizzaGate Is 100% Real, Why Is Media Lying?

PizzaGate is entirely real, which is perhaps why the massive mainstream media cover-up attempt - to label
PizzaGate as a "fake news onslaught" (whatever that is) without reviewing ANY of the pertinent facts or Wikileaks
emails - is so troubling for those of us with a moral compass.

They're covering for a child trafficking and abuse ring operating in Washington, DC. That is not okay. None of this is okay.

10 Reasons Operation Darkroom Was Covered Up!

What is Operation Darkroom? Why is the mainstream media, trying so hard to cover it up?

Savile and the 9th Circle


PedoGate (PizzaGate) Connection to Finders Cult Protected by CIA, Chinese Pedophilia

Related: PedoGate PizzaGate Origins - CIA, Political and Financial Elites Featured in this Pedophilia Special

False Flag Terrorism: Murdering The Innocent In Order To Support The Lie + 15 Ways
To Detect A False Flag Operation
January 9 2017 | From: PaulCraigRoberts / ActivistPost / Various

As my readers know, I reported, factually, on the Boston Marathon alleged bombing case. I
interviewed carefully the pro bono attorney, John Remington Graham, who intervened in behalf of
the Russian aunt, a lawyer in the Russian Federation, in behalf of the falsely convicted younger
Tsarnaev brother, Dzhokhar, the older brother having been murdered by the FBI.
Graham conclusively proved that the FBIs own evidence proved beyond any doubt that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was
innocent, which means so was the older brother.

Related: False Flag Terrorism explained: A Star Wars Analogy

It is clear beyond reasonable doubt that there was no real bombing at the Boston Marathon and that the alleged terrorist
event, using crisis actors, was an orchestration designed to convince dumbshit Americans that they really were under a
Muslim threat. The entire foreign policy of the United States in the 21st century is based on an orchestrated Muslim
threat.

The orchestrated threat was also used for a practice exercise in closing down one of Americas largest cities in order to
manhunt with intent to kill a young man chosen as the villain for the orchestrated event.
Related: Heres why Nazionists Launched Multiple False Flag Operations this Year

American citizens were forced at gunpoint out of their homes while Homeland Security, a Nazi reminiscent name from the
Hitler era, disrupted the life of an entire city and its airport service in behalf of this orchestrated event that murdered
American civil liberty.

The entire exercise was based on a lie, an event that never happened, like Saddam Husseins weapons of mass
destruction, Assads use of chemical weapons, Russias invasion of Ukraine, and so forth. Just another lie in behalf of the
exceptional people.

A number of websites have disproved the false case against the Tsarnaev brothers. Attorney John Remington Graham has
brought the case to the justice authorities, but the US Department of Justice (sic) has no interest whatsoever in justice.

Now comes forward an attorney, Mary Maxwell with a book. It is available online free. I read the first eight chapters, which
was sufficient to comfirm me in my independent conclusion that there was no Boston Marathon bombing by terrorists.

I recommend to you Mary Maxwells account. However, I will say that I believe that she uses irony excessively and that on
occasions her irony gets in the way of the factual message. Knowing this, stick with it, and read her account.

Irony is the style that she has chosen, and we must respect a person prepared to stand up to the murderous American
establishment and to challenge one of the founding myths of the American Police State and Washingtons wars against the
world.
Read her book Marathon Bombing - Indicting the Players here.

Any US citizen that believes the falsified case of the Boston Marathon bombing is a dangerous and direct threat to American
civil liberty and to the lives of millions of people on planet Earth.

If Americans do not wake up to the orchesrations to which they are subjected, they will forfeit their freedom. The Russians
and the Chinese are individually and together more powerful than Washington, and they are not going to put up with the lies
with which insouciant Americans are content.

If Americans cannot take back their country from self-serving oligarchs, Americans are doomed.

Related: 9/11 False Flag Conspiracy - Finally Solved (Names, Connections, Motives)

15 Ways To Detect A False Flag Operation


A false flag formula is becoming readily apparent in the face of so many mass shootings and
bombings in the US. The phenomenon has become so commonplace in the last 3 years that its
becoming more American than apple pie.
According to ShootingTracker.com, there have been 353 mass shootings in the USA for 2015 so far. However, as
scary as that number is, the good news is that you dont have to be afraid of them like you may think. A very large
number of them - and all of them with any mass media significance and attention are false flag staged terror
events.

Related: False Flag Terror. A Historical Overview

Some have real victims, some do not, but either way, the most criminal of all institutions the Government is the
orchestrating force behind them.

They are scripted, pre-planned operations which are definitely not the result of random gun violence. Just as Obama stated
(by hiding the truth in plain sight), there is a pattern behind these mass shootings. The Controllers are following a
definite false flag formula.

Below is a list of the top 15 elements of this formula, which you can now use to detect a false flag operation as it occurs:

False Flag Formula #1: Drill at the Same or Nearby Time and Place

The exercise or drill at the same time, at the same place has became the sine qua non or indispensable element of the
recent false flag operation. Sometimes there are slight variations on this when the Government plans a drill nearby (a few
miles away) rather than at the exact place, or plans a drill earlier on in the day, so it can just coincidentally go live.
There was a twist in the case of the recent San Bernardino shooting: the Government planned regular drills in the building
where the shooting took place every month! (Think about it what are the chances of a real mass shooting occurring in a
building used for mass shooting drills?)

As Captain Eric H. May, a former US Army military intelligence officer, stated:

The easiest way to carry out a false flag attack is by setting up a military exercise that simulates the very attack
you want to carry out."

In the case of 9/11, there were no less than 46 drills occurring simultaneously during the event, according to Webster
Tarpley, author of Synthetic Terror: Made in USA.

In the case of the London 7/7 bombings, Peter Power admitted on radio that he was leading a team who were training for
that exact scenario when it unfolded!
There were active shooter drills in all of the false flag attacks of Sandy Hook, Boston Marathon, Charleston, San
Bernardino, the Norway attack, the 2nd Paris attack of 2015 and many many more.

Whats the point of having a drill at the same time and place? Here are a few of its purposes:

1. Distract and remove key personnel who would otherwise be at the scene to contain and investigate it;

2. Confuse other personnel who will treat the whole event in a different way if they think it is a drill rather than a
real event;

3. Slow down, reduce or eliminate an effective response, especially of police and other law enforcement, given the
removal and confusion of personnel;

4. Distract and confuse witnesses, the media and the public in general;

5. Provide a great cover and period of lower defenses and security to carry out an attack, which would otherwise
be difficult or impossible if defenses were at their usual or optimal operating level.

False Flag Formula #2: Foreknowledge

Another way you can tell that a mass shooting is a false flag op is if you find proof of foreknowledge of the event. As it so
happens, all of the notorious and publicized mass attacks of late have had evidence of foreknowledge. Going way back in
time, there was foreknowledge of the Pearl Harbor attack of 1941 that got the US into World War 2.
There were many aspects of foreknowledge on 9/11, including the BBC reporting WTC7 falling before it actually did, and
mysterious calls to people like author Salman Rushdie and San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown advising them not to fly to
NYC on Sept. 11th. Sandy Hook had blatant foreknowledge (with various webpages put up days before the event), as did
the Boston Marathon.

False Flag Formula #3: Eyewitnesses Have Conflicting Accounts

You can also spot a likely false flag operation when you see or hear of multiple conflicting witness accounts. In the case of
the Aurora Colorado Batman mass shooting, eyewitnesses claimed they saw an entire team of shooters, rather than the
single shooter James Holmes of the official narrative.

With Sandy Hook, we saw multiple scenes of law enforcement chasing men into the surrounding forest, yet the official
narrative declares the only shooter was Adam Lanza. In San Bernardino, too, witnesses stated they saw 3 white athletic
men, not the 2 brown husband-and-wife team we were told did the shooting.
Related: 1 Trillion Dollar Lawsuit Filed Against MSM For Staging 'Sandy Hook'

Conflicting eyewitness accounts can destroy the official narrative no matter what the detail is. On 9/11, various fireman told
us there were bombs in the building, contradicting the official story that planes alone took down the Twin Towers.
With Sandy Hook, Gene Rosens testimony itself was full of holes and was contradicted by that of the school bus driver and
the official report.

False Flag Formula #4: MSM Quickly Name and Demonize the Patsy

Have you ever wondered how quickly the MSM (Mainstream Media) discovers the name of the patsy? They had somehow
deduced that Osama bin Laden was responsible for 9/11 just hours after the attacks.

Have you ever wondered why the Government is so good at telling us who supposedly executed these attacks right after
they happen, with almost no time to investigate, yet cant seem to manage to actually stop these alleged terror attacks?
Related: President Putin Reveals Possession Of 9/11 Satellite Imagery Evidence Indicating US Government
Complicity In False Flag Attack

Without any evidence, the MSM endlessly repeated bin Laden like a crazy mantra after 9/11, despite the fact bin Laden
himself denied involvement in the attacks and that in the end he was never formally charged by the FBI.

Have you ever wondered why many of the patsies, or sorry, deranged mass shooters, are Muslim? That wouldnt have
anything to do with the fact that the Zionist Government and MSM are trying to paint all Muslims as crazy and scary, would
it? Nothing like a good dose of Islamophobia to take your freedom away

False Flag Formula #5: Patsy Has No Military Training, Yet Shoots Extremely Fast and Accurately

Another element of the false flag formula is the skilled and lethal patsy.

According to the official narrative of false flag ops like Sandy Hook and Aurora, we are supposed to believe that skinny and
non-muscular youths, without any discernible military training, were able to acquire expensive military gear (including armor,
guns, ammunition and more), wear that gear without getting bogged down in speed, and shoot incredibly fast and
accurately.

In San Bernardino, we are supposed to believe that a young mother was strong and skilled enough to participate in killing 14
and injuring 17 people while she was strapped up with body armor and holding heavy weaponry!

In these cases and more, the official story would have you believe that its no big deal or just a coincidence that the patsy
can acquire all this high-end gear and use it so well.

False Flag Formula #6: Patsy Gets Killed, Drugged or Suicided

It is also part of the false flag formula to ensure that the patsy, who is earmarked before the event to take the fall, cannot
speak out to rationally defend themselves. This is achieved in a number of ways. The simplest is to have the patsy kill
himself or herself by committing suicide.
Related: Case Closed: JFK Killed After Shutting Down Rothschilds Federal Reserve

Another favorite way is to take the patsy out in a thrilling high speed chase, which has the added benefit of drawing clueless
people in through the MSM and gushingly promoting the police state. Sometimes a patsy is killed in plain sight, just because
its so important to suppress his testimony (e.g. Lee Harvey Oswald in the JFK assassination).

A third way is to mind control and drug the patsy to such an extent that they become a zombie vegetable unable to articulate
anything, as was the case with James Holmes.

False Flag Formula #7: Shooter Leaves Manifesto

In this day and age, writing a manifesto is a strange and anachronistic thing to do. Yet, for some strange reason, shooters
manifestos seem to crop up an awful lot after mass shootings.

Conveniently for the Controllers, these manifestos provide a perfect explanation for the official narrative, and help fill in the
missing (non-existent) motive for the attack which probably pushes those on the fence over into believing the
Governments version of the event.

While the manifesto is not an element in every false flag operation, it is present in enough of them to be regarded as part of
the false flag formula.

False Flag Formula #8: Evidence Gets Conveniently Destroyed

Another element of the false flag formula is the deliberate destruction of evidence, so that the Controllers can cover their
tracks.
In 9/11, the scrap metal (in the smoldering ruins of the WTC towers) was immediately shipped off to China right from the
start; with Sandy Hook, the entire school was demolished; in San Bernardino, the supposed landlord of the supposed
shooters actually allowed MSM reporters into the suspects house to poke around and touch all their stuff, in complete
disregard for what could be a possible crime scene!

Could it get any more blatant?

False Flag Formula #9: No Obvious Motive for the Mass Attack

Have you ever wondered why there is no obvious motive in any of these mass shootings? Crimes are supposed to be
solved on the merit of motive and opportunity, yet to hide the reality of a false flag op, the MSM just lies about the motive
part, and chalks it up to a deranged shooter.
Other times we are offered the flimsiest of motives, such as people going on an all-out rampage because they had a
grievance with a co-worker. In San Bernardino, we were told the young mother, with a 1-year-old child, was aggressive and
psychotic enough to help kill 14 and injure 17 people at the risk of never seeing her child again!

Meanwhile, the real purveyors of these operations profit immensely from the ensuing fear, yet somehow the
majority of people dont seem to see that motive...

False Flag Formula #10: Immediate Calls for Gun Control

Gun control is obviously one of the key agendas behind all of these false flag mass shootings, since a disarmed population
is far easier to exploit and manipulate than an armed one. It is an obvious aspect of the false flag formula. Sometimes gun
control is even pushed in the immediate aftermath of the event when people are still in a highly emotional and suggestible
state.

Take a look at the behavior of Andy Parker, who we were told was the father of a victim killed in the Virginia mass shooting
of 2015.
Within hours of hearing the news of the death of his child, Parker had already contacted and talked with the
Governor of Virginia, and then appeared on TV saying he would be devoting his entire life to gun control.

In a similar fashion, Richard Martinez, the alleged father of a Santa Barbara mass hooting victim, appeared on TV right after
the death angrily pleading for more gun control. In both cases, the political agenda of gun control angrily dominated their
reactions, rather than grief or other emotions.

False Flag Formula #11: Fake Victims = Crisis Actors

The above 10 points are a useful outline of the false flag formula as it pertains to mass shootings with real victims, i.e. where
real people die. However, ever since the surreal Sandy Hook event, which still contains many unanswered questions, we
have entered the twilight zone of the false flag hoax.

This is a term used to describe the false flag mass attacks where no one dies where fake bodies, fake blood and fake
victims are used instead. In this way, the entire operation is more tightly controlled and less messy. A hallmark of the false
flag hoax is that the authorities never produce a credible piece of evidence showing an actual dead body of a victim.
Is this the same girl crying at all three massacres - Aurora, Sandy Hook and Boston?

The following 5 points relate to false flag hoaxes, and specifically to the people employed to pull them off crisis actors. It
is truly a testament to just how utterly fake our normal world is (the Matrix) that false flag ops have now descended to the
level where we have to question whether the event even happened at all.

There are organizations of crisis actors in the US (such as the IIF), and there is clear evidence crisis actors were
used at Sandy Hook, Boston Marathon and many others.
Related: Charlie Hebdo: French False Flag Terror Event

Government officials have been caught using the word actor to describe various players in these dramas; the MSM has
even resorted to calling them actors too (it was one of the buzzwords of the recent San Bernardino mass shooting).

False Flag Formula #12: Victims Get Killed Twice

The surreal quality of the false flag hoax reached point of absurdity when it was discovered that one of the victims was
reportedly killed twice!

We were told that Noah Pozner was one of the victims of the Sandy Hook shooting, yet his picture was also among
those killed in a Pakistan Taliban attack.

Apparently the recycling of fake victims is another part of the false flag formula.

False Flag Formula #13: Families of Victims Have Elite or Acting Backgrounds

Is it just a coincidence that the families of mass shooting victims have either elite or acting backgrounds? At the Sandy
Hook event, local CEO of the Newtown bank John Trentacosta (whose house was next to the Lanzas and had a lot of
unusual activity occurring there the day of Sandy Hook) was connected to the New York Federal Reserve (and thus the
international banking elite).

Francine Wheeler was formerly the personal assistant of former chief Democratic National Committee fundraiser Maureen
White whose husband Steven Rattner is a Wall Street investment banker and member of the Rockefeller CFR (Council on
Foreign Relations)!

Related: Censorship Shock: Amazon.com Bans Investigative Book Nobody Died At Sandy Hook Because It
Disagrees With Government Version Of What Happened

It was also noteworthy at Sandy Hook how acting showed up in the resumes of so many of the key players there. Gene
Rosen, David and Francine Wheeler (both professional actors) and others all had a background in acting. Father of Virginia
mass shooting victim Andy Parker is an actor (and a politician too). This fact supports the idea that another element of the
false flag formula is to watch for people with elite connections and acting backgrounds.

False Flag Formula #14: Families of Victims Show Little to No Emotion, and Even Snigger and
Laugh

Luckily for truth seekers, the majority of crisis actors used in these false flag events are poor actors who are utterly
unconvincing in the roles they play. The majority display little or no emotion after an alleged tragedy like losing a family
member child to a random and violent mass shooting.

It is true that humans do vary widely with emotional response and expression. However, with many of the crisis actors,
judging by their reactions, it simply strains credibility too much to believe that they have just have been through a harrowing
and traumatic ordeal.
Related: The Great Terrorism Hoaxes from Boston to Berlin #CrisisActors Exposed

Given the range of possible reactions to a tragedy like losing a loved one in a mass shooting, what are the chances that
many of the victims family members are so non-emotional, or so understanding, or so quick to forgive?

Its shameful enough that the crisis actors playing these roles are perpetrating a monumental deception on the public,
tugging at the average persons heartstrings solely to trick them.

However, on top of that, these actors have the gall to actually laugh to smile, snigger and giggle while pulling off their
atrocious stunts. The only conclusion to draw from this is that it must be pretty funny to get a paid gig like this fooling millions
of people

False Flag Formula #15: Families of Victims Receive Millions in Federal Payoffs

In the US, the land of the lawsuit, people are generally pretty fast to initiate a lawsuit if they feel they have been wronged. It
is highly strange, therefore, that none of the alleged parents of the Sandy Hook event decided to sue the Government for
negligence or to demand redress for any other grievance.
Additionally, many of the alleged parents received a total of millions in unsolicited federal payouts (check out the free
houses they magically got on Christmas day 2009) thats right, unsolicited.

The Federal Government just gave it over to them without asking! Ask yourself: is is more likely the Government would just
do this out of the goodness of its heart, or that the money was more like a bribe/blackmail/payout all rolled into one, awarded
to actors playing a part in a role and being sworn to silence?

Related: Sandy Hook Truth Bomb Patch Media's Blatant LIES About Jonathan Reich

Conclusion: Use the 15 Elements of the False Flag Formula to Be More Aware

These are 15 elements I noticed forming the false flag formula. There may well be more.

Meanwhile, use the knowledge you have of the false flag formula to become more aware, wise and hip to the deception, so
that the next time it unfolds (as it surely will), you will be among those that spot the fakery, rather than among those who are
too scared, shell-shocked and gullible to do anything other than buy the official narrative.

Related: Articles:

Turkish Nightclub a False Flag: Mistaken Prime Suspect? Turkish Nightclubs Security Taken Over Prior to Attack
Saudi survivor: There were three killers at Reina nightclub on New Year

Convenient? Active Shooter Kills 5 in Fort Lauderdale, CNN Claims Voices in His Head Told Him to Join ISIS

Florida Governor Reaches Out to Trump Multiple Times after Shooting Bypasses Lame Duck Obama

Berlin False Flag Faked - Video Hoax

Analysis by Ole Dammegard of Norway Breivik Massacre as a False Flag Event

Ian R Crane - The False Flag Agenda

Trump Confirms "No Effect On The Outcome Of The Election" Following Intelligence
Briefing + Experts Reveal The Tricks Mainstream Media Uses To Brainwash And
Control The Masses
January 8 2017 | From: Zerohedge / NaturalNews / Various

President-elect Trump has issued a statement following his briefing with various intelligence
agencies over the Russian hacking allegations, seemingly rejecting the Democrats' charges that it
was the Russians alone and that it had any effect on the outcome of the election.
Additionally, Trump promised to appoint a team to give him a plan to combat cyber attacks within 90 days of taking
office.

Related: Fake News, Mass Hysteria, And Induced Insanity


Not quite the "stunning" reaction that Nancy Pelosi had.

The mainstream media is very disappointed...


Related: Hacker Guccifer Calls US Allegations Against Russia 'Fake Cyber War'

Experts Reveal The Tricks Mainstream Media Uses To Brainwash And Control The
Masses

You may not know this, but intelligence agencies around the world have, for decades, infiltrated
target countries by having their agents and operatives pose as journalists (no, Im not an
intelligence operative).
That served two purposes: 1) it provided the operative with legitimate cover; and 2) it allowed the operatives
government to use the operatives media position to shape public opinion in the host country.

Related: Ten basic forms of fake news used by major media

Brainwash them, in other words, with propaganda.

But in truth, that kind of propagandizing and brainwashing is also done by institutional media pushing a specific political
agenda. Think back to our recently concluded presidential election cycle and what the mainstream media did in a failed
effort to get its anointed candidate, Hillary Clinton, elected.

They lied, made up narratives out of whole cloth, and tried to smear her opponent, now-President-elect Donald J.
Trump, in an effort to defeat him.

As reported by The Waking Times, experts denote a number of techniques that are used by the establishment media to
brainwash the public and create/control the daily narrative.

The Mainstream Media Are the Real Purveyors of Fake News

Edward Bernays is known as the father of modern propaganda. He was the first to use social engineering techniques spread
via the mass media of the day. In the early 20th century, he laid the groundwork for what became cultural programming at
the societal level by assisting in the transformation of a mostly rural, agrarian-based American society into a homogenized
culture of devout statists and consumers.
The principles he developed and implemented have greatly influenced the growth of American culture, how it grew and the
direction it took.

Having picked up Bernays torch in the 21st century, several experts on modern brainwashing, mind control and propaganda
have recently given insight into their craft.

Think about what is ailing our countries today, in terms of societal problems. There is corruption of so-called grassroots
movements that are actually funded by Left-wing billionaires such as George Soros and Bill Gates, and yet the movements
are portrayed by the establishment media very often as spontaneous and locally brewed, but all are attempting to achieve a
specific social and political result.

The efforts of these allegedly organic groups are amplified many times their size by the media, which gives them both
credence and a megaphone with which to shout their views. And what do they shout?

America is racist, bigoted, homophobic, unfair, politically broken, etc. Never are the calls for unity or praise for our country
given any attention at all.

Related: Former CBS Reporter Exposes Media Lies, Internet Shills & Astroturfing
Much of this is done via a technique known as astroturfing. Seasoned veteran investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson
explains;

Astroturf is a perversion of grassroots. Astroturf is when political, corporate or other special interests disguise
themselves and publish blogs, start Facebook and twitter accounts, publish ads, letters to the editor, or simply post
comments online, to try to fool you into thinking an independent or grassroots movement is speaking.

Controlling Our Thoughts by Creating False Narratives

Another technique used is subliminal messaging. This is a cornerstone of mind control, and when a person is unwittingly
bombarded with cleverly concealed information, an emotion can be trigged leaving a persons intellect and better judgment
subjugated in favor of a mental process like fear or sexual desire.

You may never consciously understand or realize why you begin to adopt certain behaviors, products of lifestyles, but the
attraction is nonetheless real and that manifests itself through actual personal choices.

In a 2011 documentary called Programming the Nation, filmmaker, graphic artist and digital media producer Jeff Warrick, a
former advertising sales rep, provided examples of how subliminal messaging and other subconscious methods are
employed by ad executives and other media to create cultural norms and social programs like consumerism,
materialization of womens bodies, health choices and the glorification of violence.

Could such techniques really be contributing to a variety of social, political and economic problems currently
present in our culture? Such as obesity, anorexia, and other eating disorders? The ongoing war on terror?
And what about the ever-increasing amounts of debt, that has tightened its grip on a growing percentage of the
population? the documentary says.

Other techniques include fake news - yes, by the mainstream media - omission (not covering an issue as though it wasnt
real or important); slanting coverage through the use of biased expert sources; and publishing falsified data and science as
though it were legitimate.

Related Articles:
The Great "Fake News" Scare Of 1530

Ty Simpson: Taking Down David Brock and His Illicit Fake News Empire Citizens Audit

CNN Runs Fake News Story About Russia Closing Anglo-American School in Moscow

Washington Post cant stop faking the news: U.S. electrical grid penetration story a complete fabrication

FakeNews: Russia hacks Vermont infrastructure! - Old Ukrainian malware found instead

Majority Are Still Falling for Fake News

Julian Assange with Sean Hannity Russians Did Not Hack the US Election

EU Creating Fake News Watchdogs for Upcoming Elections

Fake News Mainstream media Has Half of Hillary's Supporters Believing Russia Stole Election

Two of the worlds most evil people Bill Gates and George Soros behind Facebooks news censorship agenda

Julian Assange: Media Is Colluding with Democrat Party in America

Media blackout on death of NATO auditor was he assassinated to cover-up NATOs black budget?

Donald Trump Endorses Rand Pauls Audit The Fed Bill

DNC Refused to Give FBI Access to Its Servers - Gave Access to a DNC Consultant Tied to Anti-Russia Group

CIA Training Handbook: How to Fake Intelligence Plus Case Study on Faking Russians Hacking US Election

A Case Study in the Creation of False News

The Fake News Saga: From Official Policy to Mainstream American Discourse, Propaganda in the Making

New Twist on Fake News Russian Hacking Story

The Russian Hacking: How the Leaks From Clinton and the DNC Happened

Trump Fires All Obama Politically Appointed Ambassadors Effective Inauguration Day

What Is The Obama Regime Up To? + Seven Ways Obama Is Trying To Sabotage The
Trump Administration
January 5 2017 | From: PaulCraigRoberts / Breitbart / Various

Obama has announced new sanctions on Russia based on unsubstantiated charges by the CIA
that the Russian government influenced the outcome of the US presidential election with
malicious cyber-enabled activities.
The US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has issued a report related to the declaration of 35 Russian
officials persona non grata for malicious cyber activity and harassment.

Related: Its A Plot, The Russians Are Coming: Obama Illegally Sanctions Russia for Nonexistent US Election
Hacking

The report is a description of:

Tools and infrastructure used by Russian intelligence services to compromise and exploit networks and
infrastructure associated with the recent U.S. election, as well as a range of U.S. government, political and private
sector entities.

The report does not provide any evidence that the tools and infrastructure were used to influence the outcome of the US
presidential election.

The report is simply a description of what is said to be Russian capabilities .

Related: DHS/FBI Issues Joint Analysis Report: GRIZZLY STEPPE Russian Malicious Cyber Activity

Moreover, the report begins with this disclaimer: DISCLAIMER: This report is provided as is for informational purposes
only. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) does not provide any warranties of any kind regarding any information
contained within.

Related: GRIZZLY STEPPE Russian Malicious Cyber Activity

In other words, the report not only provides no evidence of the use of the Russian tools and infrastructure in order to
influence the US presidential election, the report will not even warrant the correctness of its description of Russian
capabilities.
Related: 18 Major Scandals in Obamas Scandal-Free Presidency

Thus the DHS report makes it completely clear that the Obama regime has no evidential basis for its allegations on the
basis of which it has imposed more sanctions on Russia.

What is going on here?

First there is the question of the legality of the sanctions even if there were evidence. I am not certain, but I think that
sanctions require the action of a body, such as the UN Security Council, and cannot legally be imposed unilaterally by one
country. Additionally, it is unclear why Obama is calling the expulsion of Russian diplomats sanctions.

No other country has to do likewise. During the Cold War when diplomats were expelled for spying, it was not called
sanctions. Sanctions imply more than unilateral or bilateral expulsions of diplomats.

Second, it is clear that Obama, the CIA, and the New York Times are fully aware that the allegation is false. It is also clear
that if the CIA actually believes the allegation, the intelligence agency is totally incompetent and cannot be believed on any
subject.

Third, President Trump can rescind the sanctions in 21 days, a third reason that the sanctions are ridiculous.

So why are President Obama, the CIA, and the New York Times making charges that they know are false and for
which they have not produced a shred of evidence?
Related: Soros Launches Plan to Bring Down US and Israel

One obvious answer is that the neoconized Obama regime is desperate to ruin US-Russian relations past the point that
Trump can repair them. As the New York Times puts it;

Mr. Obamas actions clearly create a problem for Mr. Trump. The question the New York Times says, is whether
Trump stands with his democratic allies on Capitol Hill or his authoritarian friend in the Kremlin.

Can Trumps foreign policy be controlled by false allegations?

According to the New York Times, Trump has relented and agreed to being briefed by the CIA about the Russian hacking
now that Republicans such as Paul Ryan, John McCain, and Lindsey Graham have lined up with Obama and the CIA in
accepting charges for which no evidence has been presented.

However, a briefing without evidence would seem simply to further discredit the CIA in Trumps eyes.

As I have emphasized in my columns, facts no longer have a role in the United States and its empire. Allegations alone
suffice, whether in court cases, interrogation centers, foreign and domestic policies, or classrooms.

The US even bases its military invasions on false allegations - weapons of mass destruction. Indeed, the entirely
of US foreign policy since the Clinton regime has been based on nothing but false allegations.

The Russian government should have learned by now, but perhaps Moscow still thinks that facts matter in Washingtons
decisions.

Possibly we should consider that more is going on than meets the eye. Perhaps the propaganda about the Russian cyber
threat to democracy is being used to prepare American and/or European populations for an incident.

The CIA has morphed into a deep state that uses disinformation and propaganda to align decisions of Congress, the
executive branch, and foreign governments with secret behind-the-scenes agendas. Many books, such as Stephen
Kinzers The Brothers and Douglas Valentines CIA As Organized Crime have described some of these secret agendas.
Related: Trumans True Warning on the CIA

In order to deter Trump from restoring normal relations with Russia, an incident would have to be severe and irreversible.
Rather than accept defeat for their agenda of US world hegemony, the neoconservatives are prepared to take high risks.
The willingness to take risks is demonstrated by the public effort of the CIA Director to discredit the president-elect.

As expected, Putins response to the latest provocation is low key as the sanctions appear to be meaningless on the
surface.

Related: Stephen Lendman Reports President Putins Response To Obamas New Sanctions

However, in the event that something dangerous is below the surface, the Russian government might want to consider
putting its military forces on alert.

Related Articles:

Stephen Lendman Reports President Putins Response To Obamas New Sanctions

Obama Retaliates Against Russians Over Purported Cyberattack, But Is There a Double Standard?

Russia sanctions childish, petulant & pointless revenge for Clinton loss UKs ex-Syria envoy

Russia Responds To Obama On Expelled Diplomats: New Hostile Steps Will Receive An Answer

Plane with Russian diplomats expelled from US lands in Moscow

Washingtons Intent is Economic Destabilization and Regime Change In Venezuela


Rescuing Boris - TIME Magazine, 1996

Russia to Obama: Put up or Shut Up

HuffPo Turns On Obama: He Presided Over The "Destruction Of The Democratic Party"

Refugees Surge 86% Year on Year: Ahead of Trump Presidency Obama Rushes Muslim Refugees into US

Benjamin Netanyahu SLAMS Obama and Kerry In Fiery Response

Seven Ways Obama Is Trying To Sabotage The Trump Administration

President Barack Obamas final weeks in office seem dedicated to setting foreign and domestic
policy on fire to make life as difficult as possible on his successor, Donald Trump.

Here are some of the biggest mousetraps Obama scattered across the White House floor on his way out:

Related: Assange: Obama Is Obviously Trying To Delegitimize Trump - Wikileaks founder says source of email
hack is '1000% Not Russia'

1. Betraying Israel at the United Nations: Obamas refusal to block a United Nations vote against Israel, his
administrations shadowy machinations to bring that ugly motion to the floor, and Secretary of State John Kerrys long-
winded broadside against Israel will leave President Trump with a massive political crisis in the Middle East, and quite
possibly a security crisis, if terror groups and their political wings are emboldened by the rebuke of Israel.

Obamas Israel maneuver also damages American credibility, teaching would-be allies that the United States is not the best
friend to have. Americas erstwhile battlefield allies in Syria can teach the same lesson, assuming any of them are left alive
to take the podium.
This comes at the very moment aspiring hegemons in China and Russia are showing their allies how Beijing and Moscow
will go to the mat for them.

Related: Obama Publishes $7.4 BILLION Worth Of Regulations In One Night

Obamas team thinks it was clever to saddle Trump with an international edict the U.S. president cannot easily reverse.
They might not have thought this all the way through, because some of the options that are available to Trump could leave
internationalists, and Palestinian leaders, cursing Barack Obamas memory.

Note that even some commentators friendly to Obama, and sources within the Obama Administration itself, have described
the Israel vote as a deliberate act of sabotage aimed at Trump, because Obama is alarmed by some of Trumps
appointees.

2. A New Cold War With Russia: After eight years of relentlessly mocking anyone who said Russia was a major
geopolitical threat to the United States (most famously including his 2012 presidential opponent, Mitt Romney) Barack
Obama suddenly realized: You know what? Russia is a major threat!
He also awoke to the dangers of cyber-warfare, after an entire presidency of treating electronic espionage as a purely
political problem to be minimized and spun away, because taking it seriously made him look bad. Who can forget how
Obama left victims of the OPM hack twisting in the wind for weeks, because the administration didnt want to admit how
serious the attack was?

But then a top Democrat political operative fell for a crude phishing scam, and the Democratic National Committee got
hacked, so Obama well, he still didnt take cyber-espionage seriously.

He slapped the snooze bar again, because as one anonymous official put it, they thought Hillary Clinton was a
cinch to win the 2016 election, so they were willing to kick the can down the road.

No, it was Hillary Clintons loss in the election, and the desperate push to damage President-elect Trumps legitimacy, that
made the president who politely ignored China hacking 25 million American citizens private data get tough on information
security.

Tucker Carlson Destroys Leftist on Russian Election Hacking Claims

Related Articles:

Hannity Has Sit-Down Interview with Julian Assange It Was Not Russia

Robert Parry: John V. Whitbeck on the Criminal Insanity of the US Establishment Claiming Russians Hacked the
Election When It as the Establishment That Lost Under Its Own Byzantine Fraud-Friendly Rules

Intelligence Insider: Russian Hack Story Is A Giant Hoax

Robert Steele in Defence and Intelligence Norway: The Russians Did Not Hack the US Election a Few Facts
from a Former CIA Spy
Until now, states involved in cyber-espionage never got anything worse than a few carefully-chosen words of sour
disapproval from the expiring administration, but the Russkies received a sprinkling of sanctions, and 35 diplomats
were expelled.

Russia responded by unleashing an army of ducks and trolls from the depths of the Kremlin. The New Cold War is only a
few days old, and its already weirder than the old one was.

Presumably Obama thinks hes maneuvered Trump into a position that will make whatever rapprochement he might have
entertained with Moscow more difficult, or at least more politically costly for the new President.

Related: Buoyant Putin and Sinking Western Mis-Leaders

The end result might be easier relations between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, and a lingering memory of
how little Barack Obama cared about cybersecurity until it was politically expedient for him to freak out.

3. Ban on Oil Drilling: An overt act of sabotage directed at the American economy itself, leaving an especially heavy
bootprint on Alaska. Smug administration flacks spent the past couple of weeks assuring media talking heads that
Obamas unprecedented abuse of an obscure law was impossible for his successor to reverse.

Its like they stayed up all night, looking for executive actions that cant be undone by the new President four weeks later.

(Amusingly, Obama dropped this bomb on our energy sector just a few weeks after publicly advising Trump not to abuse
executive orders.)

Its likely that legions of lawyers will battle throughout 2017, and perhaps beyond, to determine if Obamas latest poke at
Trump (as Politico put it) really is irreversible. What a lovely parting gift from the departing President to the country that
elected him twice: a pile of gigantic wealth-destroying lawsuits!

4. National-Monument Land Grab: The other theoretically irreversible presidential edict discovered by Obamas
munchkins is the ability to designate national monuments. Another 1.65 million acres in Utah and Nevada was yanked off
the market in the last week of December, bring Obamas Antiquities Act acreage up to an unprecedented 553 million acres.
Related: Obama seizes Bundy Ranch area in massive last minute land grab

"This arrogant act by a lame duck president will not stand. I will work tirelessly with Congress and the incoming
Trump administration to honor the will of the people of Utah and undo this designation, thundered Senator Mike
Lee of Utah.

Sixty-five percent of his state is now under the wise and compassionate environmental protection of the same government
that turned the Colorado River into a toxic-waste dump.

5. Eliminating the National Immigration Registry: Just in case Trump got any ideas about using it as the basis for the
enhanced vetting he has promised for immigrants from terrorist-infested regions, the Obama administration killed a long-
dormant program called NSEERS that once committed the unforgivable politically-incorrect sin of tracking military-age males
from violently unstable Muslim-majority countries.

Its highly debatable whether the NSEERS program was of any practical use. When it pulled the plug, the Department of
Homeland Security noted that the post-9/11 program called for collecting data that is now routinely collected for most foreign
visitors, along with more sophisticated biometric information.

Almost everyone saw the elimination of these roles as a purely symbolic act - i.e. political sabotage directed at the incoming
President.

6. The Great Guantanamo Jailbreak: After paying little more than lip service to his promise to close the Guantanamo Bay
prison for much of his presidency, Obama went into overdrive in his last years, transferring over 150 detainees. A shocking
number of them ended up back on the battlefield.

Rep. Ed Royce (R-CA) of the House Foreign Affairs Committee wrote a Wall Street Journal op-ed this week to sound the
alarm about Obamas midnight push to empty out Guantanamo.

The White House has repeatedly released detainees to countries it knew lacked the intent and capability to keep
the detainees from returning to terrorism. The results have been deadly, Royce wrote, challenging the wisdom of
such Obama administration brainstorms as dropping al-Qaedas top bomb maker into Bosnia, a country with
limited security services but plenty of radical mosques and unemployed military-age males.
Related: 2017: The Year Of Microchipping Americans. The Law Was Just Passed

Royces committee has been investigating allegations the administration tried to pay the bomb-maker $100,000 to refrain
from passing his deadly skills along to eager apprentices. Hunting down the rest of the transferred prisoners who transferred
themselves right back into the global jihad will be a job for the Trump administration.

7. Depicting Trumps Election as a Disaster: Lets not forget Obamas acts of rhetorical sabotage, such as describing
Trumps presidential campaign as a crime against American class and racial harmony, or his wife wailing that all hope was
lost for Americas children. Trump himself has taken note of the many inflammatory President Obama statements and
roadblocks.

Its hard to remember a previous instance of the outgoing president attacking the legitimacy of his successor this way,
especially during the transition, before the new chief executive has actually done anything.

And its probably not over yet. The time for big executive orders is growing short, but Obama is always just one day away
from calling a press conference and saying something else that will make the transition more difficult.

Alex Jones To Announce Who Really Hacked the DNC


Of course he can still talk all he wants after January 20th, and hes given every indication he wont follow the dignified path
of his predecessors and allow the new president time to chart his own course, but theres no substitute for the bully pulpit of
the presidency.

The timber of Barack Obamas political voice will be very different on January 21st than it was on January 19th. More likely
than not, hell use it before he loses it.

Related: Obamas legacy of debt and disease: National debt doubles in just eight years while 10.7 million more
Americans now on food stamps to buy cancer-causing junk foods

The Top 10 Most Outrageous Science Hoaxes Of 2016


January 2 2017 | From: NaturalNews

Science hoaxes were running rampant throughout 2016, pushed by the fakestream media (CNN,
WashPost, NYT, etc.) alongside complicit government organizations working in collusion with
dishonest corporations steeped in scientific fraud (Monsanto, Big Pharma, etc.).
2016 saw more science hoaxes than a typical year, with the media placing special emphasis on the Zika virus terror
campaign (rooted in total scientific hucksterism) and more climate change propaganda (all based on fraudulently
altered data).

Related: Seeding Doubt: How Self-Appointed Guardians Of Sound Science Tip The Scales Toward Industry

In every case, those pushing the science frauds claimed to have a divine monopoly on science while declaring all opposing
views to be unscientific.

In this way, much of the science in todays corrupt society has really become nothing more than a cult of scientism,
complete with faith in the correctness of socially-reinforced beliefs while exercising instant rejection of evidence that
contradicts the fairy tale narratives of the science elite.

Sadly, science in 2016 functioned more like a priesthood of dogmatists fervently demanding the obedient worship of
their unassailable assumptions. On every issue that matters, data were thrown out the window and replaced with fraud.
Related: The Cult Of 'Scientism' Explained: How Scientific Claims Behind Cancer, Vaccines, Psychiatric Drugs And
GMOs Are Nothing More Than Corporate-Funded Science Fraud

To drive home the fraud, the scientifically illiterate lamestream media catapulted the propaganda to new heights, even
while remaining completely oblivious to the laughably false science they were promoting.

Here, I offer a summary of the most outrageous science hoaxes of 2016, along with a few links where you can explore more.
By the way, the video on the Cicret bracelet invention that claims to turn your arm into a mobile device touchscreen is
also a complete fraudulent hoax that has fooled millions of people, and I cover that in detail at the bottom of this article.

My primary message for 2017 is to stop believing in all the fake science being pushed by media, governments, academia
and corporate liars.

Science Hoax #1: Scientific Political Polling

Through the entire year, we were all subjected to an endless onslaught of so-called scientific political polls that almost
universally showed Hillary Clinton would win the election.

All the scientific polls were wrong, it turns out. (And yes, I called all this well before the election, on the record.)

What we now know is that the word scientific was slapped onto these fraudulent polls to try to give them an aura of
credibility when, in reality, they were all fabricated or distorted to give Hillary Clinton the appearance of certain victory.
But guess what? All the experts were wrong. But how is that possible if all these polls were scientific as claimed? Are the
pollsters now telling us that science is broken?

Or maybe, just maybe, they were making s##t up all along and there wasnt any real science behind the
scientific claim in the first place.

Science Hoax #2: The Zika Virus Terror Campaign

2016 saw the rolling out of an elaborate media-fronted Zika terror campaign designed to scare the entire country into
ridiculously believing that mosquito bites would cause millions of women in America to give birth to babies with shrunken
heads.

Yeah, I know, it sounds like something a Batman villain would threaten to unleash in Gotham City. Pay me one million
dollars or all your babies will be born with shrunken heads! Mwuah hah hah!
Related: Whos Behind The Zika Virus Outbreak & Fearmongering?

But, alas, the American sheeple bought the medical science hoax hook, line and sinker. Belief in the Zika virus microcephaly
hoax was so deeply embedded in the psyche of the nation that even when the Washington Post published a story admitting
there was no link after all, the vast majority of so-called scientists and doctors still believe the hoax!

So, for the record, Ill say it again in the hopes of educating all the scientifically illiterate scientists who still dont understand
actual facts: The original wave of shrunken heads in Brazil was caused by a larvacide chemical that was dumped into
the water supply, not by the Zika virus alone.

The Zika apocalypse predicted by all the doctors, scientists and TV talking heads simply did not materialize. And when
evidence contradicts your theory, you have to start questioning your theory. Otherwise, you arent a scientist. Youre just a
petty fool.

Science Hoax #3: The Flint Michigan Lead Poisoning Cover-Up

In order to poison a million black children with brain-damaging lead, the U.S. EPA masterminded a large-scale science fraud
that deliberately altered heavy metals testing results for the Flint, Michigan water supply.

Eventually, a few of the science scapegoats were charged with felony crimes for engaging in a conspiracy to alter water
quality test data, but no one from the EPA was ever charged or prosecuted for their role in the scheme. (This also proves, by
the way, that conspiracies are quite real and very much alive in our society right now.)
The result of all this was the mass poisoning of mostly African-American children with a toxic heavy metal thats well known
to damage cognitive function and impede learning.What a great way to raise more democrats!

Its all part of the new science of keeping the sheeple dumbed down so they will keep voting for corrupt criminals
like Hillary Clinton.

Instead of let them eat cake, the new progressive Jon Podesta version is, Let them drink lead!

Science Hoax #4: The Banning of GMO Labeling Nationwide by Scientifically Illiterate
Republicans

In the name of science, Republican lawmakers passed the so-called DARK Act to outlaw honest food labeling of
genetically engineered foods.

Apparently, Republicans believe that knowledge is a dangerous thing in the hands of consumers, therefore preventing
people from knowing what theyre eating is the best solution.
Related: Monsanto Promoting Worldwide Infertility? + Academic GMO Shills Exposed: Fraud & Collusion With
Monsanto

This was all accomplished via an unholy alliance among biotech corporate giants (like Monsanto) and right-leaning
lawmakers, most of whom have never met a toxic chemical they didnt absolutely love.

Notably, while Democrats are passing local laws that criminalize Big Gulp sodas, Republicans are blocking labeling laws as
a way to say, If you dont SEE the poison on the label, it doesnt actually count!

Keeping consumers in the dark is now the official science policy of the federal government.

Hows that for transparency?

Science Hoax #5: Climate Change Data Fraud

Democrats have their own science fraud, of course, and theres no better example than global warming / climate change.

An analysis of climate data reveals that 100% of U.S. warming has been faked by altering temperature data.
Related: Climate Scare Declared Officially Over- Error In Model Calculations Discovered

To the great frustration of celebritards like Matt Damon, the data dont show any warming at all unless you cook the
numbers first.

This means climate change science is actually more like climate change alchemy, which isnt science at all. Its more like
Tarot cards mixed with voodoo blended with AlGoratotalitaritopian idiocy.

Note to intelligent people: If the world were really warming, they wouldnt have to alter the temperature data, would
they?

Science Hoax #6: Abortion Organ Harvesting for Scientific Research

According to leftists, chopping up living human babies who have just been forcibly birthed in order to harvest their organs
and brains isnt unethical at all. Nope, its a tremendous advancement for scientific research, you see.

Organ harvesting isnt just limited to places like Communist China and North Korea: The practice is alive and well in
America, too. But in the U.S., it takes on a genocidal milestone because most abortions are carried out on black babies
yep, the very same black babies that were also intentionally poisoned by the EPA in Flint, Michigan (see above).
Hmmm there seems to be a pattern in all this, but I cant quite put my finger on it but it definitely seems to have
something to do with killing as many black babies as possible while labeling it all science.

Its noteworthy to remember that Adolf Hitlers eugenics programs were also conducted under the umbrella of
science.

It seems not that much has changed in almost 80 years except that instead of Jews being exterminated by the millions,
its now black babies being exterminated by the millions while democrats demand an open borders human blitzkrieg to
replace them all with socialist-leaning illegal aliens who are uninformed enough to vote for leftists.

Science Hoax #7: The California Vaccine Mandate

Another large-scale science hoax that also happens to place a disproportionate burden on African-American babies is the
California medical police state vaccine mandate pushed by Californias own Mercury Joker Dr. Richard Pan.

After receiving bribes from vaccine makers, the medical child molesting California state senator Richard Pan took part in a
media-backed medical terrorism campaign against Californias citizens, attempting to scare everyone into falsely
believing that the best way to protect the health of children is to inject them with mercury (instead of, I dont know,
maybe feeding them nutritious foods and vitamin D).
Related: Doctors Who Discovered Cancer Enzymes In Vaccines All Found Murdered

The entire vaccine mandate was founded on blatantly fraudulent quack science claims fronted by the child-murdering
vaccine industry, which continues to absurdly insist that vaccines pose zero risk to children (i.e. claiming they do not harm a
single childever). The claim is, of course, rooted in sheer delusion. But thats also what passes for legislation in
California.

We can only hope Californias #Calexit effort succeeds soon, so we can build a wall around California and stop the
contagious epidemic of lunacy from spreading Eastward.

Science Hoax #8: Janet Yellens Libtardtopia Economics Science

No summary of science quackery would be complete without bringing in the subject of economics. Yes, it qualifies as a
science at least if you ask the economists. (If you ask non-economists, it qualifies mostly as voodoo.)

Nevertheless, according to Janet Yellen and the decrepit wizards of collapse who are currently steering the global debt
Titanic directly into an array of large shards of icebergs, the best way to keep a global economy in balance is to create
endless new money until the whole thing explodes, at which point the system collapses to equilibrium where
everybody starves roughly the same amount (i.e. Venezuela).

To demonstrate this brilliant hypothesis, Yellen and her crotchety academic cohorts have been busy pumping trillions of fiat
currency dollars into the pockets of their bankster pals while raising interest rates to accelerate the debt avalanche
apocalypse timetable.
Ideally, they hope to trigger the whole thing to come crashing down sometime during Trumps first term. Then, theyll all
express total shock and dismay while pleading to the press that we should all Bring back Obama because he was a
monetary genius! (Or perhaps a radical Muslim sleeper cell working for the communists to subvert America, but thats
another hilarious satire article altogether.)

As a cherry on top, Obama also doubled the national debt in just eight years, all while handing Iran a path to nuclear
weapons, dissing Israel, subverting American culture, gutting the U.S. military and secretly telling his Russian counterparts
he would drastically reduce U.S. nuclear capabilities.

Yes indeed, the dream team of Obama, Clinton and Yellen has pulled off what Americas worst enemies could not: The
near-complete financial paralysis of the U.S. economy all while claiming Everything is awesome!

Thank God all the pensions across the country are fully funded, huh? Or that would be a real disaster.

Science Hoax #9: Transgenderism and the Lunatic Liberal Theory of Spontaneous Genetic
Transmutation

2016 also saw many gullible people being convinced to believe that a biological man can instantly transform himself into a
biological woman by declaring himself to be a woman.

At least one journalist even claimed that a transgendered man could become pregnant after declaring himself to be a
woman. Yes, science education in America has utterly collapsed at this point, replaced with liberal P.C. insanity and
delusional college lesson plans rooted in feelings rather than physical reality.

Across most of todays gender-confused college-educated youth, belief in the laws of genetic expression have been
replaced by belief that a persons sex is a choice. Its no longer permutations, phenotypes and genotypes its now
metrosexual, generation snowflake, pu##ified blathering idiocy with a diploma, safe space cry rooms and $100K in student
debt.
Sorry to burst their bubble of stupid, but sex classification isnt a personal choice. A simple genetic test shows you either
have XY chromosomes, XX chromosomes, or the far more rare extra-X-or-Y chromosome defect which typically leads to
serious physical and mental defects (including infertility).

Somebody please direct gender confused college snowflakes to the National Human Genome Research Institutes fact sheet
page on chromosomes.

According to todays college snowflakes, the National Human Genome Research Institute is a purveyor of HATE because
their fact sheet page says all these mean things about chromosomal defects:

Inheriting too many or not enough copies of sex chromosomes can lead to serious problems. For example,
females who have extra copies of the X chromosome are usually taller than average and some have mental
retardation.

Males with more than one X chromosome have Klinefelter syndrome, which is a condition characterized by tall
stature and, often, impaired fertility. Another syndrome caused by imbalance in the number of sex chromosomes is
Turner syndrome. Women with Turner have one X chromosome only. They are very short, usually do not undergo
puberty and some may have kidney or heart problems.

Thus, there are only two sexes in the biology of all mammals: Male and female. And no, you dont get to change them up
just because you think its trendy to be a gender-confused metrosexual snowflake.

This doesnt mean you cant be gay, by the way. Gay men still realize theyre men. They just choose male partners
instead of female partners. On the spectrum of personal freedom, I say people should be able to partner with
whomever they want.

Gay or straight, its all a personal choice as far as Im concerned, because its none of my business and stop shoving
your sexual preferences in my face, all you militant gay mafia activists.

Just be gay and be done with it. The gay rights war is over, and you already won it. Stop being bullies and thinking
youre still oppressed victims.
Marry whomever you want, but just #STFU about it already. Obama already lit up the White House with rainbows, for Gods
sake.

But to say that yesterday you were a male, but today youre a female now thats just technically bonkers. Youre not really
a female. Youre a male impersonating a female and thats it. Bruce Jenner, take note: You are not a woman, no matter
how much you want to impersonate one.

The greatest insult in all this was when some fashion magazine voted Bruce Jenner Woman of the Year, instantly
declaring that this guy who impersonates a woman is a better woman than all the other women. Dudes with dongs
out-women the women?

And thats celebrated by the women? Yeah, its insane. And all these same progressive women also insist that pervs with
dongs should be able to invade womens restrooms, too, because thats embracing gender identity and inclusiveness
blabbity blah blah.

Get a grip, people. Check your drawers and briefly fondle your hardware. If its junk, youre a dude, and stop playing with it
already. If it isnt, youre a woman. If you have both, go ask a doctor to run a genetic test and find out if you have ovaries.

Science Hoax #10: Every Science Journalist Working for the Fakestream Media

This is more of a collection of hoaxes rather than a single hoax. It all centers around the hilarious fact that most science
journalists are scientifically illiterate morons who only think they understand science.

I remember reading a science column in a major U.S. publication that claimed cell phones could run on water. (Yeah, I
know. I tried that by dropping my cell phone into a glass of water, but it turned off all the power for some strange reason.
Maybe I need special water?)
There has also been a wave of hilariously stupid media coverage for this bracelet computing project called Cicret that
ridiculously claims to turn your arm into a touchscreen.

The entire video promoting this Cicret bracelet is a complete fraud. Racking up almost 25 million views on Youtube, the
video shown here is accomplished purely with special effects overlays. The bracelet does not exist and cannot exist as
depicted in the video for the simple reason that light cannot bend around the curvature of your arm.

Incredibly, countless journalists across the mainstream media fell for this total hoax, stupidly believing that a hi-res
touchscreen rendition can be projected onto your skin from a bracelet that barely sits just a few millimeters above your skin
in the first place.

Question for brain dead science journalists: Do you really believe light rays from the Cicret can bend around your wrist and
then magically bounce off skin that isnt in a direct line of sight with the bracelet projector?

Seriously, you have to be incredibly stupid (or scientifically illiterate) to think the Cicret bracelet, as depicted in the videos,
can actually function. But that sure didnt stop publications from all across the world pushing the hype and convincing their
readers that this cool tech was real.
Related: Western Media Credibility In Free Fall Collapse: Case In Point: UN Peace Council: The US Media Is Lying
To The American people. The War In Syria Is Not A Civil War, It's A Proxy Invasion By The United States

And yes, the younger people are on social media these days, the more gullible they are, too. So special effects viral videos
can be very successful at raising millions of dollars in Kickstarter funds for devices that cannot ever exist because they
violate the laws of physics.

Its a whole new kind of financial scam thats legal because it only extracts money from people who are too stupid enough to
believe the viral videos. In summary, Kickstarter viral videos are a tax on stupid progressives the same way that the lotto
is a tax on stupid conservatives.

And now that Ive thoroughly offended everyone, lets wrap all this up

2016 Was a Bad Year For the Credibility of Real Science Lets Hope 2017 is Better

In summary, 2016 saw the pushing of numerous science hoaxes by the fakestream media, governments, academic
institutions and corporate propaganda whores like Forbes.com. (Oh, and we cant leave out the actual whores running
SNOPES, who were exposed as prostitutes and fetish bloggers.)

So how do we rescue science in 2017? Its simple: We start using science to tell the truth instead of allowing
governments and corporations to use science to lie.

A few fundamental scientific truths Id like to see finally embraced in 2017 would include:

Yes, there is extraterrestrial intelligence in the universe.

Yes, there is (or was) microbial life on Mars.

Yes, human consciousness is non-material and not located in the physical brain.

Yes, vaccines cause autism.


Yes, flu shots still contain mercury.

Yes, there are many anti-cancer foods that can help prevent cancer.

Yes, transgenderism is a mental disorder, not a choice.

Yes, glyphosate causes cancer.

Yes, DEET is toxic to human neurology.

Yes, genetically engineered crops seeds are a genuine threat to the environment and the food supply.

Yes, water can retain non-physical properties that subtly alter its interactions with living systems.

No, carbon dioxide is not the enemy of mankind.

No, chemotherapy does not cure cancer. It often makes it worse.

No, harvesting organs from living human babies is not ethical science.

No, science journals are not unbiased, objective arbiters of truth.

No, scientific political polls are not reliable. They are bunk.

No, the experts are not as smart as they think they are. Mostly, theyre idiots who have attained high positions
of persistent idiocy in academia or government, and their job is to protect the idiocy for as long as possible,
making sure no one overthrows idiocy with intelligence.

Senate Quietly Passes The "Countering Disinformation And Propaganda Act" & Obama
Bans Free Speech In The Dead Of Night
December 30 2016 | From: ZeroHedge/ Infowars / Various

While we wait to see if and when the Senate will pass (and president will sign) Bill "H.R. 6393,
Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017", which was passed by the House at the end of
November with an overwhelming majority and which seeks to crack down on websites suspected of
conducting Russian propaganda.
President Trump is going to have an awful lot of un-doing to do...

It calls for the US government to "counter active measures by Russia to exert covert influence carried out
in coordination with, or at the behest of, political leaders or the security services of the Russian Federation and the
role of the Russian Federation has been hidden or not acknowledged publicly, another, perhaps even more
dangerous and limiting to civil rights and freedom of speech bill passed on December 8.

Related: Gun Control FAIL: Mass Shootings Surge 240% During Obamas Presidency

Recall that as we reported in early June;

"A bill to implement the U.S. very own de facto Ministry of Truth has been quietly introduced in Congress. As with
any legislation attempting to dodge the public spotlight the Countering Foreign Propaganda and Disinformation Act
of 2016 marks a further curtailment of press freedom and another avenue to stultify avenues of accurate
information.

Introduced by Congressmen Adam Kinzinger and Ted Lieu, H.R. 5181 seeks a whole-government
approach without the bureaucratic restrictions to counter foreign disinformation and manipulation,
which they believe threaten the worlds security and stability.
Related: "Ministry of Truth" now active in America

Also called the Countering Information Warfare Act of 2016 (S. 2692), when introduced in March by Sen. Rob
Portman, the legislation represents a dramatic return to Cold War-era government propaganda battles.

"These countries spend vast sums of money on advanced broadcast and digital media capabilities, targeted
campaigns, funding of foreign political movements, and other efforts to influence key audiences and
populations, Portman explained, adding that while the U.S. spends a relatively small amount on its Voice of
America, the Kremlin provides enormous funding for its news organization, RT.

Surprisingly, Portman continued, there is currently no single U.S. governmental agency or department
charged with the national level development, integration and synchronization of whole-of-government
strategies to counter foreign propaganda and disinformation.

Long before the "fake news" meme became a daily topic of extensive conversation on wuch mainstream fake news portals as
CNN and WaPo, H.R. 5181 would rask the Secretary of State with coordinating the Secretary of Defense, the Director of
National Intelligence, and the Broadcasting Board of Governors to establish a Center for Information Analysis and
Response, which will pinpoint sources of disinformation, analyze data, and - in true dystopic manner - develop and
disseminate fact-based narratives to counter effrontery propaganda.
Related: Epic Montage Video Illustrates How Badly the Media Failed in 2016

Fast forward to Thursday, December 8, when the "Countering Disinformation and Propaganda Act" passed in the Senate,
quietly inserted inside the 2017 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) Conference Report.

Here is the full statement issued by the generously funded Senator Rob Portman (R- Ohio) on the passage of a bill that further
chips away at press liberties in the US, and which sets the stage for future witch hunts and website shutdowns, purely as a
result of an accusation that any one media outlet or site is considered as a source of "disinformation and
propaganda" and is shut down by the government.

How North Korea and the Obama regime Both Use the Same Mind Control Techniques Against Their
Citizens

This eye-opening new video details how U.S. government propaganda under Obama parallels the socially-reinforced
mind control tactics used in North Korea, a radical left-wing dictatorship rooted in the cult worship of its leader.
Related: Obama Signs Portman-Murphy Kill Alt-Media Bill into Law Under Xmas Cover

Barack Obama is simply a more polite rendition of the same social control tyranny used by Kim Jong-Un. Angela
Merkel, in many ways, invokes the same tactics of disinformation and linguistic social control, deliberately lying to
the people of Germany in order to control them while the country is systematically destroyed to appease globalist
interests.

As I also state in the video, most Americans would be obedient Kim Jong-Un worshipers if they had grown up in North Korea.

The vast majority of individuals in western society today falsely believe they are independent thinkers, but thats only
because theyve been indoctrinated under a system of mind control thats very good at pretending to be based on freedom.

Watch the full video to see for yourself. (This video was recorded before the Nov. 8 Trump election victory, which provides a
least some glimmer of hope that the globalist agenda might be slowed.)

Senate Passes Major Portman-Murphy Counter-Propaganda Bill as Part of NDAA

Portman/Murphy Bill Promotes Coordinated Strategy to Defend America, Allies Against Propaganda and Disinformation from
Russia, China & Others

U.S. Senators Rob Portman (R-OH) and Chris Murphy (D-CT) today announced that their Countering Disinformation and
Propaganda Act legislation designed to help American allies counter foreign government propaganda from Russia,
China, and other nations has passed the Senate as part of the FY 2017 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)
Conference Report.
Related: How the Crackdown on Patriots Will Occur: Dissent Will Become Unthinkable

The bipartisan bill, which was introduced by Senators Portman and Murphy in March, will improve the ability of the United
States to counter foreign propaganda and disinformation by establishing an interagency center housed at the State
Department to coordinate and synchronize counter-propaganda efforts throughout the U.S. government.

To support these efforts, the bill also creates a grant program for NGOs, think tanks, civil society and other experts outside
government who are engaged in counter-propaganda related work. This will better leverage existing expertise and empower
local communities to defend themselves from foreign manipulation.

The passage of this bill in the Senate today takes us one critical step closer to effectively confronting the
extensive, and destabilizing, foreign propaganda and disinformation operations being waged against us.
While the propaganda and disinformation threat has grown, the U.S. government has been asleep at the
wheel.

Today we are finally signaling that enough is enough; the United States will no longer sit on the sidelines. We are
going to confront this threat head-on, said Senator Portman.

With the help of this bipartisan bill, the disinformation and propaganda used against our allies and our interests
will fail.

Congress has taken a big step in fighting back against fake news and propaganda from countries like
Russia. When the president signs this bill into law, the United States will finally have a dedicated set of
tools and resources to confront our adversaries widespread efforts to spread false narratives that
undermine democratic institutions and compromise Americas foreign policy goals, said Murphy.

Im proud of what Senator Portman and I accomplished here because its long past time for the U.S. to get off the
sidelines and confront these growing threats.

NOTE: The bipartisan Countering Disinformation and Propaganda Act is organized around two main priorities to help achieve
the goal of combatting the constantly evolving threat of foreign disinformation.

They are as follows:


The first priority is developing a whole-of-government strategy for countering foreign propaganda and disinformation. The
bill would increase the authority, resources, and mandate of the Global Engagement Center to include state actors
like Russia and China in addition to violent extremists.

The Center will be led by the State Department, but with the active senior level participation of the Department of
Defense, USAID, the Broadcasting Board of Governors, the Intelligence Community, and other relevant agencies. The
Center will develop, integrate, and synchronize whole-of-government initiatives to expose and counter foreign disinformation
operations and proactively advance fact-based narratives that support U.S. allies and interests.

Second, the legislation seeks to leverage expertise from outside government to create more adaptive and responsive U.S.
strategy options. The legislation establishes a fund to help train local journalists and provide grants and contracts to
NGOs, civil society organizations, think tanks, private sector companies, media organizations, and other experts
outside the U.S. government with experience in identifying and analyzing the latest trends in foreign government
disinformation techniques.

This fund will complement and support the Centers role by integrating capabilities and expertise available outside the U.S.
government into the strategy-making process. It will also empower a decentralized network of private sector experts and
integrate their expertise into the strategy-making process.

In other words, the Act will:

i) Greenlight the government to crack down with impunity against any media property it deems "propaganda", and

ii) Provide substantial amounts of money fund an army of "local journalist" counterpropaganda, to make sure the
government's own fake news drowns that of the still free "fringes."

So while packaged politely in a veneer of "countering disinformation and propaganda", the bill, once signed by Obama, will
effectively give the government a full mandate to punish, shut down or otherwise prosecute, any website it deems offensive
and a source of "foreign government propaganda from Russia, China or other nations."

And since there is no formal way of proving whether or not there is indeed a foreign propaganda sponsor, all that will
be sufficient to eliminate any "dissenting" website, will be the government's word against that of the website. One
can be confident that the US government will almost certainly prevail in every single time.

Obama Bans Free Speech In The Dead Of Night


America adopts Soviet style media controls.

By slipping through the 2017 National Defense Authorization Act, President Obama has signed the Countering
Disinformation And Propaganda Act into law, effectively putting all speech under federal control.

Related: So Called Fake News Could be a Thing of the Past

Top Doctors Reveal Vaccines Turn Our Immune System Against Us + Study Pulled
From Publication After Proving Truth Of Vaccinated Versus Unvaccinated Children
December 24 2016 | From: NaturalBlaze/ NaturalNews

The research is hard to ignore, vaccines can trigger autoimmunity with a laundry list of diseases to
follow. With harmful and toxic metals as some vaccine ingredients, who is susceptible and which
individuals are more at risk?

No one would accuse Yehuda Shoenfeld of being a quack. The Israeli clinician has spent more than three decades
studying the human immune system and is at the pinnacle of his profession.

Related: Nursing student expelled for questioning directives to use threats, lies to coerce patients to vaccinate

You might say he is more foundation than fringe in his specialty; he wrote the textbooks. The Mosaic of
Autoimmunity, Autoantibodies, Diagnostic Criteria in Autoimmune Diseases, Infection and Autoimmunity, Cancer and
Autoimmunity the list is 25 titles long and some of them are cornerstones of clinical practice.

Hardly surprising that Shoenfeld has been called the Godfather of Autoimmunology the study of the immune system turned
on itself in a wide array of diseases from type 1 diabetes to ulcerative colitis and multiple sclerosis.

But something strange is happening in the world of immunology lately and a small evidence of it is that the Godfather of
Autoimmunology is pointing to vaccines - specifically, some of their ingredients including the toxic metal aluminum as a
significant contributor to the growing global epidemic of autoimmune diseases.

Related: Trump: Vaccines Cause Autism And Will Be Investigated

The bigger evidence is a huge body of research thats poured in in the past 15 years, and particularly in the past five years.
Take for example, a recent article published in the journal Pharmacological Research in which Shoenfeld and colleagues
issue unprecedented guidelines naming four categories of people who are most at risk for vaccine-induced autoimmunity.

On one hand, vaccines prevent infections which can trigger autoimmunity, say the papers authors, Alessandra Soriano, of
the Department of Clinical Medicine and Rheumatology at the Campus Bio-Medico University in Rome, Gideon Nesher, of the
Hebrew University Medical School in Jerusalem and Shoenfeld, founder and head of the Zabludowicz Center of Autoimmune
Diseases in the Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer.

He is also editor of three medical journals and author of more than 1,500 research papers across the spectrum of medical
journalism and founder of the International Congress on Autoimmunology.

On the other hand, many reports that describe post-vaccination autoimmunity strongly suggest that vaccines can
indeed trigger autoimmunity.

Defined autoimmune diseases that may occur following vaccinations include arthritis, lupus (systemic lupus
erythematosus, SLE) diabetes mellitus, thrombocytopenia, vasculitis, dermatomyosiositis, Guillain-Barre syndrome
and demyelinating disorders. Almost all types of vaccines have been reported to be associated with the onset of
ASIA.
Related: Herd immunity is a myth: Why un-vaccinated children are not a threat to others

ASIA or Autoimmune/inflammatory Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants (also known as Shoenfelds syndrome) - first appeared
in the Journal of Autoimmunology four years ago.

It is an umbrella term for a collection of similar symptoms, including Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, that result after
exposure to an adjuvant an environmental agent including common vaccine ingredients that stimulate the immune
system.

Since then an enormous body of research, using ASIA as a paradigm, has begun to unravel the mystery of how environmental
toxins, particularly the metal aluminum used in vaccines, can trigger an immune system chain reaction in susceptible
individuals and may lead to overt autoimmune disease.

Autoimmune disease results when the bodys system meant to attack foreign invaders turns instead to attack part of the body
it belongs to (auto is Greek for self). If the immune system is like a national defence system, antibodies are like drones
programmed to recognize a certain type of invader (a bacteria say) and to destroy them or mark them for destruction by other
special forces.
Autoantibodies are like drones that are misidentifying a component of the human body and have launched a sustained attack
on it. If they mistakenly target a component of the conductive sheath around neurons, for example, nerve impulses stop
conducting properly, muscles go into spasm and coordination fails; multiple sclerosis results.

If autoantibodies erroneously focus on joint tissue; rheumatoid arthritis results. If they target the islets of Langerhans in the
pancreas, Type 1 diabetes, and so on

Throughout our lifetime the normal immune system walks a fine line between preserving normal immune reactions
and developing autoimmune diseases, says the paper.

The healthy immune system is tolerant to self-antigens. When self-tolerance is disturbed, dysregulation of the
immune system follows, resulting in emergence of an autoimmune disease. Vaccination is one of the conditions
that may disturb this homeostasis in susceptible individuals, resulting in autoimmune phenomena and ASIA.

Who is susceptible is the subject of the paper entitled, Predicting post-vaccination autoimmunity: Who might be
at risk? It lists four categories of people:

1. Those who have had a previous autoimmune reaction to a vaccine

2. Anyone with a medical history of autoimmunity

3. Patients with a history of allergic reactions

4. Anyone at high risk of developing autoimmune disease including anyone with a family history of autoimmunity,
presence of autoantibodies which are detectable by blood tests and other factors including low vitamin D and
smoking.

Previous Reaction
Regarding those who have had a previous adverse reaction to vaccines, the paper cites five relevant studies including the
case of a death of a teenage girl six months following her third Gardasil injection against HPV virus.

Related: Gardasil Fully Exposed: HPV Vaccine Being Tested on Infants Has Killed, Permanently Injured Thousands

She had experienced a range of symptoms shortly after her first dose, including dizziness, numbness and tingling in her
hands, and memory lapses. After her second injection, she developed intermittent arm weakness, frequent tiredness
requiring daytime naps, worse tingling, night sweats, chest pain and palpitations.

A full autopsy was unrevealing but blood and spleen tissue analysis revealed HPV-16 L1 gene DNA fragments - matching the
DNA found in vials of the Gardasil vaccine against cervical cancer - thus implicating the vaccine as a causal factor.

The DNA fragments had also been found to be complexed with the aluminum adjuvant which, according to the report, have
been shown to persist for up to 8 to 10 years causing chronic immune system stimulation.

Although data is limited, Shoenfeld and his colleagues concluded, it seems preferable that individuals with prior
autoimmune or autoimmune-like reactions to vaccinations, should not be immunized, at least not with the same
type of vaccine.

Established Autoimmune Condition

The second group which the paper cites for vaccine exemption is patients with established autoimmune conditions. Vaccines
dont work so well in them, say Shoenfeld and his colleagues, and they are at risk for flares following vaccination.

Inoculations that contain live viruses including chickenpox, yellow fever and the measles, mumps and rubella triple vaccine
(MMR) are generally contraindicated for people with autoimmune conditions because of the risk of uncontrolled viral
replication. But inactivated vaccines are not such a good idea either because they usually contain the added ingredient
aluminum, linked to autoimmunity.

The immunologists describe recent studies in which patients with autoimmune rheumatic disease given the influenza vaccine
(without aluminum) suffered more joint pain and fever than controls and whose levels of autoantibodies (the drones that attack
self) increased after receiving the flu vaccine.
Related: How The CDC And Vaccine Court Create An Epidemic Of Autism

Whats more, they developed new types of autoantibodies that werent present before the vaccines, and those persisted. As
the presence of autoantibodies can be predictive of developing autoimmune disease in patients without symptoms, even
years ahead of disease onset, this is troubling to those who understand immunology.

A number of studies claim vaccines are safe for the overwhelming majority of patients with established autoimmune
diseases, the study allows, but they only looked at rheumatoid arthritis and lupus and not at severe and active cases so the
potential benefit of vaccination should be weighed against its potential risk, they cautioned.

Patients With a History of Allergy

Vaccine trials have usually excluded vulnerable individuals - only extremely healthy individuals with no allergies are
recruited. Its a selection bias, say Soriano and Shoenfeld, and has likely resulted in serious adverse events being
considerably underestimated in real life where vaccines are mandated to all individuals regardless of their susceptibility.

The true incidence of allergic reactions to vaccines, normally estimated at between one in 50,000 to one in a million doses, is
probably much higher and particularly where gelatin or egg proteins are on the ingredients list, they say.

Theres a long list of vaccine ingredients that are potential allergens: besides the infectious agents themselves, there are
those from hens egg, horse serum, bakers yeast, numerous antibiotics, formaldehyde and lactose, as well inadvertent
ingredients such as latex.
Related: New Study Confirms That Mercury Is Linked to Autism

Peoples allergic histories have to be taken before vaccination say the researchers. But some signs of reaction dont
show up until after the shot.

The public health nurse or GP might tell patients that a long-lasting swelling around the injection site after a vaccine is a
normal reaction, for example. But that is not what the immunologists say. [A]luminum sensitization manifests as nodules [hard
lumps] at the injection site that often regress after weeks or months, but may persist for years. In such cases, they say, a
patch test can be done to confirm sensitivity and to avoid vaccination.

According to a growing body of research, though, allergy may be only the beginning of many dangerous aluminum-induced
phenomena.

The Trouble With Aluminium

Aluminum has been added to vaccines since about 1926 when Alexander Glenny and colleagues noticed it would produce
better antibody responses in vaccines than the antigen alone. Glenny figured the alum was inducing what he called a depot
effect slowing the release of the antigen and heightening the immune response.

For 60 years his theory was accepted dogma. And over the same time, the vaccine schedule grew decade on decade, but few
ever questioned the effects of injecting aluminum into the body, which is strange considering its known toxicity.

A PubMed search on aluminum and toxicity turns up 4,258 entries. Its neurotoxicity is well documented. It affects memory,
cognition, psychomotor control; it damages the blood brain barrier, activates brain inflammation, depresses mitochondrial
function and plenty of research suggests it is a key player in the formation of the amyloid plaques and tangles in the brains of
Alzheimers patients.
Related: The WHO's condescending tips for EU healthcare workers to convince informed patients that vaccines are
safe

Its been implicated in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and autism and demonstrated to induce allergy.

When kidney dialysis patients were accidentally infused with aluminum, the dialysis-induced encephalopathy (DAE) they
developed neurological symptoms: speech abnormalities, tremors, memory loss, impaired concentration and behavioural
changes. Many of the patients eventually went into comas and died. The lucky ones survived: when the source of toxicity,
aluminum, was removed from their dialysis they recovered rapidly.

With these new observations, researchers began investigating the adjuvant effects of aluminum and in the past decade there
has been a flurry of research. Far from being a sandbag that holds the antigen for a while and then gets excreted, it turns out
that aluminum salts trigger a storm of defence action.

Vaccines: A Violation of Human Rights


The video below is a rational discussion about vaccines with Christina Hildebrand, President of A Voice For Choice,
Inc. where she explains why mandatory vaccines are a violation of your human rights and how they are potentially
dangerous to you or your child's health.

Christina is passionate about ensuring people know what they are putting into their bodies - be it food, air, water or
medications. For the past 12 years, Christina has spent many thousands of hours researching and sharing her knowledge
within her local community.

However, with the growth of the Big Ag and Big pHARMa's influences on US politics, Christina realized that she needed to
take this to a different level and educate the masses on their right to informed choice and transparency of what goes into their
bodies.
Within hours of injection of the same aluminum oxyhydroxide in vaccines into mice, for example, armies of specialized
immune cells are on the move, calling in grid coordinates for more specialist assault forces. Within a day, a whole host of
immune system commandos are in play - neutrophils, eosinophils, inflammatory monocytes, myeloid and dendritic cells,
activating lymphocytes and secreting proteins called cytokines.

The cytokines themselves cause collateral damage but they send out signals, directing cell-to-cell communication and
recruiting other cells into action. If the next phase of the attack is launched: fibroblast growth factor, interferons, interleukins,
platelet derived growth factor, transforming growth factor and tumour necrosis factor might all be engaged.

Theres evidence that poorly understood and pesky inflammasomes, (currently a topic of cutting- edge cancer causation
research) such as the Nod-like receptor 3( NLRP) are activated too, but its all still too early to say exactly what theyre doing.

Related: The most evil people in medicine today

New research emerging from University of British Columbia has found that aluminum adjuvant injected into mice can alter the
expression of genes associated with autoimmunity.

And in their recent study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, immunologists at the University
of Colorado found that even host DNA is recruited into the aluminum assault, that it rapidly coats injected alum, triggering
effects that scientists have barely scratched the surface of understanding.

The Significance of Macrophagic Myofasciitis

This mobility or translocation of aluminum in the body is perhaps the most disturbing of the mounting evidence in current
aluminum research. In 1998, French researcher Romain Gherardi and his colleagues observed an emerging condition of
unknown origin which presented in patients post-vaccination with Chronic Fatigue like symptoms including swollen lymph
nodes, joint and muscle pain and exhaustion.

Tissue biopsies of the patients deltoid revealed lesions up to 1 cm in diameter and unique from similar lesions of other
diseases. They went to the lab for analysis and to Gherardis astonishment, they mainly consisted of macrophages large
white blood cells in the immune system whose job is to swallow up foreign invaders in the body. Enclosed in the cellular fluid
of these phagocytes were agglomerates of nanocrystals of aluminum.
Related: Cannabis Oil Cured Girls Leukemia After HPV Vaccine Broke Down Her Body: Hayley Willar

Gherardi and his colleagues began injecting mice with aluminum to see what happened. Their research published in 2013
revealed that the metal particles were engulfed by macrophages and formed MMF-like granulomas that dispersed to distant
lymph nodes, spleen, liver and eventually brain.

This strongly suggests that long-term adjuvant biopersistence within phagocytic cells is a prerequisite of slow
brain translocation and delayed neurotoxicity, writes Gherardi in his February 2015 review of the relevant
research in Frontiers in Neurology.

A more frightening animal study of aluminum is that of Spanish veterinary researcher Lluis Lujans study of ovine ASIA.

After huge numbers of sheep in Spain died in 2008 in the wake of a compulsory multiple vaccine campaign against
bluetongue in Spain in 2008, Lujan set out to find out what killed them and he began by inoculating them with aluminum.

His 2013 study found that only 0.5% of sheep inoculated with aluminum vaccines showed immediate reactions of lethargy,
transient blindness, stupor, prostration and seizures

Characterized by a severe meningoencephalitis, similar to postvaccine reactions seen in humans.

Most of them recovered, temporarily, but postmortem exams of the ones who didnt revealed acute brain inflammation.
The delayed onset chronic phase of the disease affected far more of the sheep - 50-70% of flocks and sometimes virtually
100% of animals within a given flock, usually including all of those who had previously recovered.

The reaction was frequently triggered by exposure to cold and began with restlessness and compulsive wool-biting, then
progressed to acute redness of the skin, generalized weakness, extreme weight loss and muscle tremors, and finally, entered
the terminal phase where the animals went down on their front quarters, became comatose and died.

Related: Cancer industry profits 'locked in' by nagalase molecule injected into humans via vaccines... spurs tumor
growth... explains aggressive vaccine push

Post-mortem examinations revealed severe neuron necrosis and aluminum in the nerve tissue.

The immune systems reaction to aluminum represents a major health challenge, Gerhardi declares in his recent review, and
he adds that;

Attempts to seriously examine safety concerns raised by the bio-persistent character and brain accumulation of
alum particles have not been made A lot must be done to understand how, in certain individuals, alum-
containing vaccines may become insidiously unsafe.

Back to the problem of which certain individuals should avoid vaccination to avoid autoimmune disease.

People Prone to Develop Autoimmunity

Soriano and Shoenfelds identify a final category: anyone at risk of developing autoimmune disease. Since a number of them
have been shown to have genetic factors that would include anyone with a family history of autoimmune disease.

It also includes anyone who has tested positive for autoantibodies which can indicate disease years before symptoms show
up. Vaccinations, the doctors say, may trigger or worsen the disease.

Smokers too, have an exceptionally high risk of developing an autoimmune disease, says the report. The American Cancer
Society estimates that about 18% of Americans smoke. That means about 42 million Americans have an elevated risk of
developing an autoimmune disease and theyre stacking the odds with every vaccine.
Related: Vaccinations: An analysis of the health risks

And finally, factors that Shoenfeld and Soriano associate with high risk of developing autoimmunity are high estrogen and low
vitamin D - which means anyone taking birth control or hormone replacement therapy and, according to one 2009 study of
vitamin D status, about three quarters of American teens and adults should be wary of vaccines.

Shoenfeld doesnt seem to mean to exclude all of these people from immunization, however. The paper concludes that for
the overwhelming majority of individuals, vaccines carry no risk of systemic autoimmune disease and should be administered
according to current recommendations.

Which is in stark contrast to the body of the paper. The final word is cautionary about weighing the potential benefit of
vaccinationagainst its potential risk.

Its exemplary of a strange sort of schizophrenia in a wide range of recent immunology papers. The doctors seem to be trying
to reconcile a century of safe and effective vaccine dogma with the last decades worth of terrifying research findings.
Theres a lot of on the one hand and on the other hand in them.
Related: Gary Null: Are we being lied to about 'vaccine efficacy'?

The new research seems about to gain the upper hand, however. A 2013 overview of ASIA by six immunologists including
Shoenfeld, for example, is a catalogue of vaccine side effects from Gardasil deaths, narcolepsy epidemics, infertility, chronic
fatigue, dead sheep and aluminum-addled brains. It is rife with statements that would have been virtually unheard of inside
mainstream medicine a decade ago. Like this shocker:

Perhaps, in twenty years, physicians will be dueling with better characterized particles of autoimmunity, and the
vaccines may become fully safe as well as effective.

Nonetheless the recognition of ASIA has initiated the change to put more efforts in identifying the good, the bad
and the ugly of vaccines and in particular of adjuvants as triggers of autoimmunity.

Bad and ugly of vaccines? Whats wrong with the adjuvants? Thats not in the CDC hand-out.

Or How About This One:

Despite the huge amount of money invested in studying vaccines, there are few observational studies
and virtually no randomized clinical trials documenting the effect on mortality of any of the existing
vaccines.

One recent paper found an increased hospitalization rate with the increase of the number of vaccine doses
and a mortality rate ratio for 5-8 vaccine doses to 1-4 doses of 1.5, indicating a statistically significant
increase of deaths associated with higher vaccine doses.
Since vaccines are given to millions of infants annually, it is imperative that health authorities have
scientific data from synergistic toxicity studies on all combinations of vaccines

That could be any anti-vaxxer jabbering onbut its not.

But Here is the Topper:

The US Supreme Court ruled that vaccines makers are immune from lawsuits charging that the design of the
vaccine is defective. Thus there is need for innovative clinical trial design and the vaccines themselves should be
redesigned.

Immunologists including the worlds leading authority on autoimmunity are saying it is time to take vaccines back to
the drawing board.

Autoimmune disease is the third leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and now among the top 10 killers of
young American women.

The American Autoimmune Related Diseases Association estimates that 50 million Americans suffer from one of 88
autoimmune diseases - from type 1 diabetes to systemic lupus erythematosus - and some research puts the figure at one in
five globally.

At least 40 more diseases are suspected to be immune-mediated. Most of them are devastating - frequently crippling,
expensive to treat and incurable. And they are increasing at an astonishing pace.

Related: Mercury and autism: New research provides yet more damning evidence that mercury exposure leads to
ASD
At this stage, it looks like the more the research pours in, the harder it is going to get for pro-vaccine immunologists to keep
multiple personality disorder or complete nervous breakdown - at bay. Ten years of cutting edge research into aluminums
effects on the immune system has revealed primarily how wrong they were.

And how little they know. If, after 90 years, doctors finally have begun to seriously examine the mechanism and question the
merits of injecting metal toxins into newborn babies, what have they yet to discover? ASIA sounds awful. (Too bad for all the
people whose kids suffered through chronic fatigue when it was just a Freudian yearning to sleep with their mother.)

But what if, like Lujans sheep, the negligible minority that has been paying the price for the good of humanity is actually only
the tip of the iceberg? What if some people with no apparent adverse immune reactions still have nanocrystals of aluminum
silently depositing in their brains? What if ASIA really includes Alzheimers? ALS, autism? ADD? And thats just the As.

Related: New Transmissible Vaccine Spreads Like Virus, No Consent Necessary

Even if immunologists keep wearing their rose coloured glasses, and vaccine ingredients are only responsible for a tiny
fraction of the exploding autoimmunity, the ugly in vaccines will still get harder and harder to ignore.

When everyone on the planet is getting injected, 20 years is a long time for disabled people to stack up while scientists duel
with the characterized particles of autoimmunity.

In the fury over the Disneyland measles outbreak that is gripping the worlds vaccine promoters, time is running out for
doctors and researchers who see the bad and ugly side of vaccines and their adjuvants to do something about it.

Theres slim chance of a vaccine redesign in the absence of a profit incentive and a strong chance of universal vaccine
mandates for one and all - previous anaphylactic shock reaction or not.

Study Pulled From Publication After Proving Truth Of Vaccinated Versus Unvaccinated
Children

The censorship of science is nothing new. In Canada, for instance, there were serious concerns
about the federal governments increasingly strict regulations that prevented scientists from sharing
their findings with the public.
Censorship, on the whole, is a persistently under-acknowledged problem in our society. The election of Donald
Trump certainly showcased the fact that the mainstream media only portrays the narratives they want us to see.

In the latest instance of scientific censorship, an article from a scientific journal was unpublished, but only after vaccine
enthusiasts proclaimed that it needed to be removed. The study, you see, examined the differences in health outcomes
between vaccinated and unvaccinated children.

The studys results indicated that:

Vaccinated children were significantly less likely than the unvaccinated to have been diagnosed with
chickenpox and pertussis, but significantly more likely to have been diagnosed with pneumonia, otitis
media, allergies and NDDs (defined as Autism Spectrum Disorder, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder,
and/or a learning disability).

From the mothers reports, the researchers found that vaccinated children were more likely to have allergies and
neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). The team noted that even after controlling for other factors, vaccination remained
significantly associated with the presence of an NDD.

VaxXed Stories: Social Engineering of Medical Professionals


Dr. Suzanne Humphries attends a meeting called "Confronting Vaccine Resistance: Strategies For Success" at NYU
Langone Medical Center in New York, New York on November 21, 2016.

This meetings speakers were Senator Richard Pan, Dr. Paul Offit and Dorit Rubenstein Reiss. Afterwards she comes out to
the VaxXed Bus to share what happened. Camera and editing by Joshua Coleman.

Indeed, those that were vaccinated were three times more likely to be diagnosed with an NDD such as autism. The
combination of preterm birth and vaccination produced an even higher risk of NDD, increasing the chances of it by more than
six-fold.

In the abstract, the researchers wrote in their conclusion;

In this study based on mothers reports, the vaccinated had a higher rate of allergies and NDD than the
unvaccinated. Vaccination, but not preterm birth, remained significantly associated with NDD after controlling for
other factors.

However, preterm birth combined with vaccination was associated with an apparent synergistic increase in the
odds of NDD. Further research involving larger, independent samples is needed to verify and understand these
unexpected findings in order to optimize the impact of vaccines on childrens health.

Baxter Dmitry from Investment Watch Blog notes that the study was unpublished from the journal Frontiers In Public Health.
Normally, one can still view the cached version in internet archives.

But Baxter says this too was removed, noting that a cached version available on internet archives has also been removed,
suggesting there is a serious campaign to stop members of the public from viewing the study.

Fortunately, a screenshot of the study was saved before the whole thing was scrubbed off the internet for good.
Prior to being removed from the internet, the study was subjected to massive amounts of scrutiny; apparently in this instance,
the use of surveys which are widely used for data gathering somehow invites bias.

Some of the colorful public comments included;

This study is of poor design, though not impossible results. Study relies of self-report of moms, inducing
bias, and, Another garbage vaccine study in Frontiers journal. Scientists, stop reviewing/publishing there.
This, of course, is not the first time that a study that showcased the potential ill effects of vaccines has been pulled from the
internet. In February, the journal Vaccine temporarily removed, and eventually retracted, a study that linked the HPV vaccine
to behavioral issues in mice.

Publishing research that contains information that conflicts with the mainstream narrative continues to prove to be a quick and
easy way to find yourself blacklisted and censored by conventional media. This just underscores the importance
of independent research and alternative media outlets.

Related: Big Pharma now wants to vaccinate babies while theyre still in the womb

10 More Signs That The Global Elites Ship Is Sinking + Viral Image Shows Why The
Global Elite Are Panicking - Former U.S. VP To Media We Dont Need You Guys
Anymore
December 23 2016 | From: WakingTimes / IUV / Various

Times are continuing to shift in a big way and humanitys rise over the darkness that has plagued
our planet for a very long time is gathering momentum by the day.

Remember, the elites modus operandi is to crush any form of hope or belief that things can or will get better.

Related: The Ongoing Historic Fall Of The Khazarian Empire

Truth prevails though and we are seeing the old world order crumble. 2017 is sure to be an exciting year. Continue to dream
big.

1. June 23rd, 2016: Britain votes to leave the European Union. While some are choosing to see this as an extremist act
whose focus was on securing the border from immigrants, there is a much bigger picture to that event.

While it must be said that the immigration issue is in the minds of some who were pro-Brexit (and thus needs to be humanely
and compassionately addressed), the bigger issue was that Britain reclaimed its sovereignty back from the imperialistic
banking and political cabal.
Related: Criminally Negligent IMF Head Lagarde Unpunished, Heres Why

As it has been reported in The Telegraph, a mainstream media outlet in the UK, the CIA and the U.S. State Department have
been heavily involved in the creation of the European Union from the very beginning.

As Professor Alan Sked said in the article: Voters in Britains referendum need to understand that the European Union was
about building a federal superstate from day one.

2. July 22nd, 2016: Wikileaks releases over 20,000 emails from the Democratic National Convention and shows the deep
collusion between the Clinton Campaign and the DNC itself. These revelations ultimately helped force the resignations of the
top 4 positions within the DNC.

3. October 8th, 2016: Shortly after Wikileaks began dumping the PodestaFiles, emails were revealed that John Podesta, the
Clinton campaign chairman, was receiving emails about UFO/E.T. disclosure as well as free energy technology, whose emails
came from former NASA astronaut Edgar Mitchell.
These are highly significant in the fact that it is admitted by Mitchell that such technologies do exist and that even the Vatican
knows of them.

Once these technologies are known about on an even wider scale, the lies and corruption of the oil industry will fall apart and
humanity can then reclaim its freedom.

4. October 10th, 2016: Turkey defies the banking cabal and signs the Turkish Stream gas pipeline deal with Russia.
Because Russia is in opposition to the cabal, or NWO, as some would prefer, this is a massive financial and geopolitical
game-changer.

5. October 20th, 2016: The Philippines president Rodrigo Duterte visits China with 200 Filipino businessmen to mend ties
with China. He also announces his separation from the U.S. (which is a blow to the cabal) and seeks an alliance with not only
China, but Russia too. The BRICS Alliance continues to grow.

6. October 30th, 2016: Icelands Prime Minister steps down as the activist, anti-establishment party, known as The Pirate
Party, comes in second in national elections and jumps its number of parliament seats from 3 to 10.
As more people around the world herald the call for true freedom, political parties reflecting such ideals will continue to prevail.
The Pirate Party is in over 40 countries around the world currently, and the movement continues to grow.

7. November 4th, 2016: Wikileaks emails reveal the Podesta brothers were invited to a spirit cooking dinner and involved
eating sperm and menstrual blood. While some surely laughed this off, keep in mind that former FBI special agent Ted
Gunderson spent several years investigating and exposing this information to the public, before being murdered.

We must also keep in mind that former BBC star Jimmy Savile was revealed to being involved in a massive, elite-ridden
pedophile ring.
Related: Report: Obama Threatened Putin With WAR Over Election Hacking Conspiracy Theory

The pedophilia and ritualistic claims against many of the elites is well known around the world and is a very serious issue. The
fact that even a small bit of this came out in the Wikileaks revelations is significant and a sign of the times. So much more is
coming.

8. November 8th, 2016: It was revealed by Neil Keenan that several globalists/cabalists, including Mark Carney of the Bank
of England, Janet Yellen of the Federal Reserve, the Rothschilds, Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak and others were
involved in a deal to steal 1 million metric tons of Gold from the global collateral accounts.

As of this writing, the deal has been stopped and it very beneficial to humanity.

While this story might not make much sense to many readers, understand that the global collateral accounts are the cabals
biggest financial secret on this planet. It is the reason JFK was killed and it also relates to 9/11.

9. November 13th, 2016: The European countries of Moldova and Bulgaria elect new presidents, both of whom are pro-
Russia. This is yet another major setback for the globalists plans of creating a superstate out of Europe. Watch for even more
countries to begin aligning with Russia.

10. November 15th, 2016: More than 200 rallies around the U.S. take place to protest the North Dakota pipeline that is
being attempted to form.

The world is continuing to awaken and sees the lunacy of oil and gas for energy. Clean solutions already exist.

What are some other stories that you believe are signs that the elites ship is sinking? Some believe that the election of
Donald Trump is a sign.

Further signs are the recent resignations of Cabal-placed heads of state, namely the resignation of the Prime Minister of New
Zealand, the Prime Minister of Italy and the President of France - all three of which announced their intention to resign their
positions withinn the same 24 hour period.

Related: The Liberation of Aleppo: A Regional Turning Point. Setback for US-Led Aggression

Viral Image Shows Why The Global Elite Are Panicking - Former U.S. VP To Media We
Dont Need You Guys Anymore
There is a direct correlation between populism growing across the globe, replacing the global
elite one by one, and the fall of the mainstream media. The media has not become irrelevant
because the globalists are falling, but rather the global elite are falling because the media has
become irrelevant.
That is a very important distinction and a lesson learned in 2016 that must not ever be forgotten.

Populism is described as a political doctrine that stems from a viewpoint of struggle between the populace and a ruling
faction. Nationalism on the other hand is defined as patriotic feeling, principles, or efforts.

Globalism is the exact opposite of both. Globalists believe what is best for the international community, should override what
is best for individual countries, basically sacrificing the welfare of a nations populace to benefit the international community
as a whole.

One Globalist Leader Left Standing

With the passing of the Brexit referendum in the UK which caused David Cameron, the Prime Minister, to resign, the election
of Donald Trump in the U.S. as a repudiation of globalist leader Barack Obama, the Italian referendum which
caused the Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi to resign, and the recent announcement by French President Francois
Hollande that he will not be seeking re-election, there is one global elite leader left standing

Angela Merkel, who has suffered some major losses herself in Germany.
Camerion, Obama, Merkel, Hollande, Renzi at G5 Summit

The image above, minus the X marks on their heads, has been going viral on social media, with messages like Three pro-EU
globalists down, one more pro-EU globalist to go, and four down, Merkel to go, according to the Independent UK, in an
article headlined Last world leader standing: The photo that shows just how much the world has changed in 2016.

Each of these leaders have been seen as betrayers by the populists in their respective countries, putting the good of
others above the good of those they were elected to represent, and each have been repudiated in elections and
referendums in 2016 by the very people they have betrayed with their globalist policies.

Jobs, manufacturing, the economy, all sacrificed by the five globalists above in pursuit of their New World Order, and all but
one will be gone in 2017, with Angela Merkel seeking a fourth term, despite a historic loss in the Berlin state election in
September, which many believe was a backlash against her open immigration policies.

Globalist Cheerleaders (Mainstream Media) Become Irrelevant

The globalist supporting media in each of the unexpected losses had campaigned hard to prevent populism from overcoming
globalism or to rephrase, to prevent the people from overcoming the elite and their agenda.
Before the Brexit vote, the media hyperventilated and claimed the whole world and markets would be thrown in turmoil, in an
attempt to influence the referendum results.

Headlines from before the referendum included Brexit would have huge economic impact and spark turmoil in global
markets from the Daily Mail and Brexit would create turmoil and damage Irish trade, from the Irish Times. One of the most
amusing headlines came from the UK Mirror at the time, who declared Brexit could end Britains hopes of hosting another
World Cup or Olympics.

The same hyperbolic headlines proceeded Italys recent referendum, with promising chaos if the No vote one and Renzi
resigns.

The same type of howling preceded the U.S. elections with dire warnings of what would happen if Donald Trump beat globalist
Hillary Clinton, where CNN headlined on November 6 with:

US election 2016: this is the global market turmoil that would be triggered by a Donald Trump victory, to which
not only didnt happen, but just the opposite occurred, as one day after the election, markets rallied and stocks
soared, with increases still being seen as CNBC reports today that Stocks have been on a rip-roaring rally
since the U.S. election.

One pattern here is that in every case, the mainstream media had attempted to influence the outcome, always in favor of the
globalists, but the more important pattern is that the populace in each instance in their respective countries.. ignored
them.

Ignored the consistent flow of skewed polls claiming the populist candidate or position had no chance, ignored the constant
negative stories being slammed out daily, in many case multiple times a day, against the candidate or position the media
didnt favor.
While polling over the decades has shown an increase of distrust toward the mainstream media, until 2016, they were still
able to influence primaries, elections, referendums and votes. those days are gone, and that is why the global elite are
panicking.

Former US VP to Media: "We Don't Need You Guys Anymore"

Former U.S. VP Dick Cheney recently sat down with Former Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and CNNs Barbara Starr at
the Reagan Library, and said something horrifying to the mainstream media and the globalists.

Love him or hate him... the truth is the truth. Starr asked Cheney about the language of President-elect Trumps tweets and
after answering her Cheney stated:

I think one of the reasons people get so concerned about the tweets is it is sort of a way around the press. He
doesnt have to rely upon, uh, rely upon - this is the modern era, modern technology. Hes at the point
where we dont need you guys anymore.

The laughter from the audience is clearly heard but nothing from CNNs Starr, because those are the words the global elite
and the MSM are all terrified of because they are the truth.

That comment comes at the 3:20 minute mark in the clip below:
Bottom Line

The mainstream media and their fake news, along with their fake polls, using skewed demographics intended to create an
illusion meant to influence the public, has failed, and with it they took the last thing propping up globalism and touting it as the
way forward, in an attempt to create a New World Order.

The term leader of the free world has often been used to describe the United States and more commonly the U.S. President
of the United States, and having a populist U.S. President is a tremendous blow to globalists across the world, so it is no
coincidence that after an election to where the populist candidate won, Clinton teamed up with Green Party candidate Jill
Stein to petition for recounts in the three states that Trump flipped, which if successful would have handed the election to the
globalist candidate Hillary Clinton.

It is also no coincidence that organized protests, funded by globalist George Soros, have been seen across America after the
election or that we are seeing dire warnings of bloody Friday, with reports warning that ISIS could attack on inauguration
day.

The panicked globalists will not give up...

Fear, Bloodshed And Human Sacrifices Before Winter Solstice


December 22 2016 | From: VigilantCitizen

The killing of an ambassador in Turkey on live television and the attack of a Christmas market in
Berlin occurred at a crucial time of year.

The Russian ambassador with his killer standing behind him, moments before the gunshot
On December 19th 2016, Donald Trump was officially confirmed as President of the United States by the Electoral
College. Media coverage of this event was however eclipsed by attacks that ironically confirm why he was elected in
the first place. And these attacks will most likely greatly influence upcoming elections in Germany, France and the
Netherlands. A drastic change in political scenery is in the horizon, and it is fueled by fear, bloodshed and rejection
of globalism.

Related: Putin vows to destroy ISIL after ambassador killed

The assassination of a Russian ambassador on live television and the violent attack of a Christmas market in Germany are
events that are not only violent, but charged with intense symbolism meant to shock the public mind.

Whether this was coincidental or not, these events occurred right on the brink of the winter solstice a period that is historically
prone to blood sacrifices as it is a minor Sabbath in the occult calendar. Before Christmas, there was Saturnalia.

The origins of Christmas predate Christianity through the Pagan holiday called Saturnalia, which was a week-long
of lawlessness from December 17th through December 25th that honored Saturn and included human sacrifice,
intoxication, naked caroling and rape. During these seven days, there were no punishments for breaking any laws,
according to Roman law.

- In5d, Esoteric Meaning of Christmas

It was traditional to offer gifts of imitation fruit (a symbol of fertility), dolls (symbolic of the custom of human
sacrifice), and candles (reminiscent of the bonfires traditionally associated with pagan solstice celebrations). A
mock king was chosen, usually from a group of slaves or criminals, and although he was permitted to behave in an
unrestrained manner for seven days of the festival, he was usually killed at the end.

The Saturnalia eventually degenerated into a week-long spree of debauchery and crime giving rise to the
modern use of the tern saturnalia, meaning a period of unrestrained license and revelry.

- Time and Date, Holidays and Traditions around the December solstice

On December 19th, the entire world witnessed a live murder, a carefully planned sacrifice.

The Russian Ambassador

Andrey Karlov, Russias ambassador to Turkey was shot dead on Monday evening as he delivered a speech at a photo
exposition. The killer, identified as Mert Altintas, was an off-duty member of Ankaras police force.

The entire scene was extremely surreal because, beyond the violence, it was visually perfect. It was a set piece made for
mass media.
Related: Russian Officials: Highly Likely Ambassador Assassination a NATO False Flag

Mert Altintas stood behind the ambassador, wearing a stylishly tailored black suit, which sharply contrasted with the
immaculate white background adorned with pictures of Russia. Several gunshots then wring out and the ambassador falls on
his back, suddenly lifeless. The gunman then walks around the body, yelling Allahu Akbar and Dont forget Aleppo until
police finally manages to reach him and shoot him down.

As one reviews this surreal scene, one wonders: How was this even allowed to happen? How come this 22-year-old, off-duty
cop, who is part of the riot squad, was the only person standing behind Karlov this entire time? Reports are now saying that
the gunman refused security check.

The off-duty police officer who assassinated Russias ambassador to Turkey refused to go through an X-ray
security check before the shooting - but was let into the event anyway, according to a report.

The Hurriyet Daily News reported Tuesday that the assassin, Mevlt Mert Altintas, simply flashed his police ID to
enter Ankaras Contemporary Arts Center - where Russian Ambassador Andrey Karlov was scheduled to speak at
a photo exhibition.

- Daily News, Assassin of Turkeys Russian ambassador refused security check before ambushing event

Related: Putin Assures Envoy Karlovs Murderers to Feel the Heat of Russian Response
Also, all signs point to the attack being ordered from above, Mert Altintas being the proverbial patsy.

It had been determined Tuesday if Altintas, 22, was part of a wider plan to take out the Russian ambassador. But
a senior Turkish official told the Associated Press Altintas likely did not act alone. The official, speaking
anonymously, called the killing fully professional, not a one-man action.

- Ibid.

Turkish authorities suspect that Altintas was under the influence of Fetullah Gulen, a Turkish preacher who is currently based
in the United States, in Pennsylvania. He is suspected of being a CIA operative conducting operations meant to
destabilize Erdogans government.

Although some draw comparisons between this event and the assassination that lead to WWI, it is unlikely that the killing will
cause significant change. It will most likely justify the Russian-Turkish involvement in Syria.

Berlin Attack

The truck used to conduct the attack with Christmas decorations stuck on the windshield. Sadly symbolic

Related: Statement from President-Elect Donald J. Trump on the Attack in Berlin


Around the same time the assassination occurred in Turkey, a horrific attack took place in Berlin killing 12 people and 48
others.

What authorities can say for certain is that a tractor-trailer with Polish license plates and laden with steel rods
jumped a sidewalk around 8 p.m. Monday and plowed into the market near the Kaiser Wilhelm Memorial Church, a
symbolic Berlin site whose spire, jagged from bomb damage, was intentionally left unrepaired after World War II.

- NY Times, Berlin Christmas Market Was Target of Terrorist Attack, Angela Merkel Says

This event was also charged with symbolic meaning. It was not simply about killing people, it was an attack on German
culture, history and tradition. Christmas markets are a German tradition originating from the Middle Ages where locals shop for
various goods while getting into the Christmas spirit.

The market that was attacked is situated near the Kaiser Wilheml Memorial church, a symbolic piece of German history.

Related: The CIA Strikes Again?

The truck and the wreckage it caused at the foot of the Church. Although not all Germans are religious, the building remains a
piece of local history.

This bloody attack is therefore custom-built to anger the German population who have to witness a beloved tradition being
turned into a bloodbath by terrorists.

This anger might very well translate into votes against Merkel (and her open-door policy to refugees) in the upcoming
elections. It might also influence the French elections where Le Pen is gaining traction.

At the time of writing this article, Berlin police detains a suspect who is said to be a refugee from Pakistan. However, police
also stated that they might have the wrong person and that the true culprit might still be on the run. No matter who finally gets
arrested, ultimate losers will be citizens who will have to suffer through even more scrutiny, monitoring and surveillance for
more security.

The elites motto is Ordo Ab Chao (Order Out of Chaos) and Merkels policy brought to Germany great deal of chaos. Now
people will crave for order. And that order might come at a terrible price.

In Conclusion

The two events described above were not only about killing people. They were about sending a message. They were charged
with symbolic meaning custom made for mass media and social networks.

These events occurred at a sensitive time of the year, the winter solstice, a minor Sabbath, historically celebrated with human
sacrifice. Whether this date was intentionally selected or not, the entire world was forced to witness a planned killing, a ritual
sacrifice carried out methodically as the killer screamed God is Great.

Top 10 Most Delusional Facts Of The Lunatic Left-Wing Fact-Checkers


December 22 2016 | From: NaturalNews

Since Facebook has announced its intention to erect a Ministry of Truth echo chamber by labeling
all news it doesnt like fake news, I thought it appropriate to unveil the top 10 most delusional
facts people will be subjected to if they keep viewing Facebook, CNN, or any other news
propaganda being put out by what has become the mentally ill political left today.
As anyone with a functioning brain already knows, the unhinged left is utterly clueless about the properties of
facts or where they come from. To them, facts are whatever their friends keep repeating, even if they have no
basis whatsoever in evidence or reality.

Related: The Western Presstitutes Are Firmly Based In Nazi Propaganda Techniques

In essence, facts are whatever they believe, while fake news is whatever you believe. (It really is that simple in their feeble
brains.)

So consider these top 10 most delusional facts well soon see rolled out as truth by the newly-sprung news
cartels operating inside Fakebook.

Fact #1: Eating Meat is Cruelty to Animals, But Harvesting the Organs of Living, Partially-Born
Human Babies Isnt Cruel at All

Somehow, the delusional left has decided that animals are conscious beings but not human babies. Yeah, its insane, I know.
Liberalism is best defined as a kind of mental illness where a person can hold two utterly contradictory thoughts in their head
at the same time while simultaneously believing them both.

To demonstrate this particular brand of lunacy, a Beastie Boy recently announced a new line of cruelty free sneakers with
proceeds to benefit abortion providers. Yep, no animals were harmed in the process of butchering these babies might as
well be the sicko slogan of the unhinged left.

Fact #2: If Not For the Burning of Fossil Fuels, Earths Climate Would Never Change at All

At first, they called their hoax global warming, but when it turned out the Earth wasnt warming at all - funny how that works
when you use actual data instead of fraudulently altered numbers - they had to roll out a more encompassing name: Climate
Change.

According to Climate Change cultists - named thusly because no amount of evidence can alter their faith in Climate Change
- Earths climate never changed at all until humankind came along and started burning fossil fuels.
But now - OMG! - every hurricane, flood, drought, forest fire and freezing arctic blast is automatically attributed to climate
change. Yep, especially among young leftists who have been indoctrinated by the lies of government-run schools, they think
their ancestors lived in a time when Earth was eternal Spring, with no climate variation or natural disasters whatsoever.

Its only because you and I are using air conditioning and driving SUVs that the planet has become angry, unleashing all sorts
of climatic changes that otherwise would have never occurred.

This explanation, you may have noticed, closely resembles the superstitions of 5th-century humans who largely believed that
bad weather and solar eclipses were caused by angry gods seeking to punish them. In over 1000 years, weve learned
nothing, it seems, and progressives have thrust us back to an era of incredible ignorance and superstition where scientific
evidence is abandoned for the sake of powerful cult-like beliefs.

Fact #3: People with XY Chromosomes Can Instantly Transform All Their Genes Into XX
Chromosomes by Declaring Themselves to be Women (the Theory of Spontaneous Genetic
Transmutation)

Ask any young liberal and theyll tell you there are at least 30 genders, maybe even more if you count TransUnicorn. If you
can stop laughing hilariously, ask them whether sex is determined by genetic expression or by a choice. They will insist its a
choice!
And just like that, the delusional leftists discard centuries of scientific knowledge in genetics, sexual reproduction, phenotype
expressions and physical reality. If you dare point out to them that transgenderism is a mental illness, they will label you a
purveyor of either hatred or fake news.

To them, a feeling is more REAL than actual science, you see. And if a young man sucks down enough bisphenol-A to start
feeling like a woman, then his womanhood is accepted as a fact by the deranged lunatic left. Some of them even insist that
such gender-fluid biological males can get pregnant and have babies!

I have named this hilarious bit of leftish delusional idiocy the Theory of Spontaneous Genetic Transmutation. This theory is
quite literally accepted as fact by nearly every liberal under the age of 30.

Fact #4: Media News Coverage During the Presidential Campaign Was Completely Fair to Both
Clinton and Trump, But the DNC Hacks Were One-Sided, and Thus Totally Unfair

Yep, according to the delusional left, the almost universally glowing media coverage of Hillary Clinton - alongside relentless
media attacks waged against Trump - were fair and balanced. But Trump won the election because the DNC hacks (which
were actually leaks from a Bernie Sanders supporter, not hacks at all) were totally unfair because they only leaked the emails
of the democrats, not republicans.

Kellyanne Conway: CIA Should Go and Testify and Stop Leaking to the Media
Hidden in that protest is an astonishing presumption that all the leaked DNC emails were true! And they reveal a deeply
shocking level of collusion inside the DNC to destroy Bernie Sanders and steal the nomination for Hillary Clinton.

Fact #5: Hillary Clinton Should be President Because She Won the Popular Vote, But When
Bernie Sanders Kept Winning the Popular Vote During the Primary, Clinton Somehow Got All the
Delegates Hmmm

Hilariously, the Clinton campaign (and all delusional leftists in general) only believes in popular votes when they win the
popular vote.

When they dont win the popular vote, they believe in rigging the delegates to make sure their candidate gets the delegate
votes even if they lost the popular vote. This is exactly how Hillary Clinton kept walking away with the vast majority of
delegates even in states where Bernie Sanders won the popular votes (sometimes in a landslide).

Beyond all that, the presidential election is not determined by popular votes, or else Donald Trump would have campaigned
heavily in places like New York City and Los Angeles.

The winner is determined by Electoral Votes, which is why Donald Trump campaigned in the areas that deliver
electoral victories. (Gosh, is he supposed to be a bad person for following the rules and winning by those rules?)

Judge Jeanine: I'll tell you what hope is, Michelle

If the Clinton campaign didnt think the Electoral College was fair, why didnt they protest it before the results revealed Hillary
to be the loser? The answer, of course, is because nearly every leftist in America was completely convinced that Hillary
Clinton would win the election (because thats what the media echo chamber told them).

Hilariously, this caused many of them to avoid going out to vote, thereby ensuring their ballot box loss. CNNs false media
narrative that Hillary was unbeatable, in other words, may have actually handed Donald Trump the election victory. (Such is
the price of extreme arrogance.)
Fact #6: Theres No Such Thing as a Hate Crime Against White People

According to the lunatic left, hate crimes can only be committed by white people against people of color. The opposite
cannot occur because white people deserve to be beaten, raped, or shot by people of color, you see. (For the record, I am a
person of color, which means I am therefore incapable of committing any hate crime myself, you see.)

Thus, when a group of Black Lives Matter terrorists marches in the streets calling for the open murder of white people - or
dragging people out of their vehicles and beating them solely because of their white skin color - they are not engage in hate
crimes at all, according to the delusional left.

Instead, they are said to be engaged in social justice. Because, you see, violence is always called justice by the worst
criminals in every collapsing society.

This is why the entire left-wing media censors all news about black people attacking white people, but strongly emphasizes all
news about white people attacking black people. Its all part of controlling the narrative to paint the kind of one-sided
propaganda that the delusional left depends on for its very survival.

For the record, here at Natural News, we believe that there is no such thing as a thought crime. Crimes of violence are
crimes in and of themselves due to their actions. Attaching a layer of hate to the motivation behind such a crime is a grave
injustice.

Crimes should be prosecuted based on the actions of those who committed them, not on the words uttered while carrying
them out. Otherwise, we are admitting that words are crimes.

Fact #7: Guns Are Conscious, Self-Animating Objects That Leap Out Of Their Holsters and Shoot
People All On Their Own
According to delusional leftists who essentially believe in magic, guns are self-directed objects that shoot people all on
their own. Leftists truly believe that a gun in a room can leap to its feet, target individuals and discharge bullets without
needing to be actuated by the will of a person.

This is where the delusional left comes up with meaningless phrases like gun violence, placing the emphasis on the
inanimate object rather than the person deploying it. There is no such thing as gun violence any more than there is hammer
violence when murderers use hammers.

When Somali tribes commit mass murder against each other using machetes, the left never describes such events as
machete violence and tries to blame machetes. Ever wonder why? Because that would sound incredibly stupid.

But when it comes to guns, the left gladly invokes the phrase gun violence in order to blame guns rather than people. Its a
deliberately loaded phrase thats designed to blame guns rather than the mostly left-wing criminals who use them to commit
violence against society.

Similarly, when radical Islamic terrorists used an ice cream truck to mow down tourists in Paris, the left-wing media reported
the mass murder as being carried out by the truck! News reports proclaimed, TRUCK runs over 85 people or Authorities
are searching for TRUCK that murdered 85

Somehow, it never occurs to idiotic leftists that a terrorist was driving the truck. And if trucks are such murderous instruments
of death, then why isnt the left calling for a nationwide truck ban?

Fact #8: Only Progressives Can Identify Facts Everyone Else Doesnt Know What Theyre
Talking About

This fact is the best one of all. According to the delusional, fringe left, only people who support left-wing policies can
recognize or identify facts.

This twisted special sauce of circular logic is what leftists tell themselves when they proclaim their version of facts to be
absolute and authoritative, while anyone elses version of facts are nothing but lies and falsehoods.
Related: Facebook's plan to tackle fake news raises questions over limitations

Thus, the lunatic left believes it gets facts straight from God in a sort of divining ritual from which indisputable facts
emerge much like a genie might appear after vigorously rubbing a brass lamp.

This monopoly of facts is the sole domain of liberals, you see, and they know this because so many of them agree with that
supposition, thus proving it to be true by social consensus. They surveyed each other, you see, and now they cite the survey
which states that 100% of all people everywhere participate in surveys. This, too, is a fact of the delusional left-wing media.

(Its kind of convenient for journalists at the Washington Post when they merely need to cite each other as unnamed sources
for whatever news they happen to be fabricating at the moment, too.

Who needs actual intelligence sources when WashPost reporters can circle jerk each other for made-up quotes that get
worked into their front page fabrications?)

Fact #9: Intentions Count MoreThan Actions

Obama is a good President and a good person. How do we know that? Because he has good intentions.

Never mind the fact that he doubled the national debt to nearly $20 trillion. Never mind the fact that his DOJ masterminded a
gun-running operation to put illegal weapons into the hands of Mexican drug cartels (Operation Fast and Furious).

Never mind the indisputable observation that he was a race baiter who created division, hatred and distrust across Americas
cultural fabric. And pay no attention to the astonishing job loss, unemployment and plummeting wages caused by the
Obamacare scheme he championed as some sort of twisted, pathetic legacy.

Nope, youre not supposed to consider actual reality when it comes to judging people on the left. They are all given a pass on
their behavior as long as they have good intentions, you see.
This is why it doesnt matter to the left that Bill Clinton is an accused rapist, sexual molester and repeated attacker of multiple
women who have openly and publicly accused him of sexual assault.

According to the delusional left, Bill Clinton gets a free pass on all that because hes a good liberal. He has compassion, dont
you know? He supports abortion, carbon taxes and banning the Second Amendment. Thus, according to the left, it doesnt
matter how many women he raped, abused or molested.

Facts be damned. When it comes to protecting the champions of the political left, no amount of legitimate evidence of criminal
wrongdoing can overcome the lefts blind faith in their so-called leaders, even if they be pedophiles ordering sicko sessions
with minors like buying pizza off a menu.

Fact #10: Bigger Government is Always the Answer

No matter what challenges society may face, the disconnected left believes bigger government is always the answer.

Got a problem with people drinking too much soda? We need bigger government to function as food police and criminalize
large sodas offerings.

Are too many dementia patients forgetting where they are and wandering aimlessly across mall parking lots? We need bigger
government, the left insists, to microchip and track the location of all those afflicted with mental disorders. (Its true,
Congress just passed the law for government to microchip citizens.)
Cant afford your rent? Mobile phone bills? Groceries? Dont worry, the government will create a new program to take money
from all those who earned it and redistribute the funds to loyal democrat voters who consume it (while, of course, padding the
pockets of the politically connected elite along the way).

According to the delusional left, theres no problem too large that even larger government cant solve! Their utopian
economy, in fact, is a system where the free market is abolished and replaced by a centrally planned economy which
values equality above all else.

Our world already has a system like that, by the way. Its called Venezuela. And right now, all the self-righteous Venezuelans
who voted for equality are eating out of grocery store dumpsters while having their cash criminalized and confiscated by the
very same government they stupidly put into power. (Will socialists never learn?)

The Greatest Fact of All is the Fact That Leftists Have Increasingly Become Fact-Free Lunatics

So lets cut the crap. Almost everything the lunatic left insists is a fact turns out to be a fairy tale or outright lie. Polar bears
are going extinct! If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor! Raising taxes on corporations is good for creating jobs!

Hillary Clinton believes in honoring the outcome of all democratic elections except for the ones she loses.
And if you lose an election in a democracy, the correct course of action, according to the left, is to keep threatening electoral
voters with murder until you get your way.

It turns out that, for the most part, leftists are fact-free lunatics. I could lay out a hundred striking examples of the lunacy and
contradictions of the delusional left, but you probably already see many of them yourself.

The left has become so deranged and disconnected from reality that their cheap tactics of race baiting and slandering
their political opponents simply dont work anymore.

The political left in America, which was once a semi-respected organization that opposed George Bushs corporate-run wars
and fought to reduce air pollution has become a twisted cabal of deranged fringe lunatics who have already crossed the
threshold of mental illness.
Now, with the help of Fakebook - which has become the online equivalent of Darth Vader - theyre going to try to steamroll
society with a whole new set of fabricated facts that will also fail miserably just like their recent election efforts.

Facts are stubborn things. More importantly, no one has a monopoly on them.

Those who try to censor whatever facts they dont agree with will only end up making the things they dispute increasingly
popular for the simple reason that human beings are curious about the world around them, and they dont take kindly to
having a homogenized, sanitized worldview shoved down their throats by self-proclaimed fact checkers who genuinely
belong in a psychiatric ward.

But dont take my word for anything. After all, everything Ive written here is merely my opinion. Open your eyes, explore the
world for yourself, and make up your own mind.

That simple act, by the way, will make you a lifelong enemy of the left which demands you remain blindly obedient to their
facts even when your own direct experiences contradict them.

Remember: The ultimate goal of the radical left is to make you abandon trust in your own senses, thoughts and logical
conclusions. Only then can they dominate your existence with their fabrications that any clear-headed person would instantly
see right through.

Related: As the Coup Against Trump Fails, the Threat Against His Life Rises

Facebook To Become Left-Wing Propaganda Echo Chamber With Orwellian Plan To


Label Independent Journalism Fake + Facebook Jumps On Fake News Fact-Checker
Train, Will Roll Out With PolitiFact
December 21 2016 | From: NaturalNews / WashingtonTimes

Facebook has announced a new plan today that will very quickly transform the social media site into
an echo chamber of left-wing media lies and delusional propaganda (just like weve recently seen
pushed by the Washington Post).
The new effort will rely on left-wing fact checker organizations like Politifact and Snopes to determine the
truthiness of news stories, reports Business Insider. Those stories deemed by left-wing fact checkers to be
inaccurate will be buried in Facebook users feeds as a form of organized totalitarian censorship.

Related: PropOrNot: Evidence of a CIA Psychological Operation

This Ministry of Truth news dictatorship plan will, of course, transform Facebook into nothing more than a news bubble
where left-wing propaganda is repeated as fact while independent journalism is labeled fake.

This means all stories that are critical of vaccines, GMOs, Planned Parenthood or Hillary Clinton will be censored out of
existence. The political left, you see, doesnt seek to win any debate at all their goal is to ban the debate so that you never
read any views other than theirs. (They cant win any legitimate debates or legitimate elections, so they cheat.)

In essence, Facebook has now announced its going to become the North Korea of social media.

Facebooks Fact Checkers Are Left-Wing Propagandsts Who Despise Factual Journalism

We believe providing more context can help people decide for themselves what to trust and what to
share, the company said.

Weve started a program to work with third-party fact checking organizations that are signatories of Poynters
International Fact Checking Code of Principles. Well use the reports from our community, along with other signals,
to send stories to these organizations.

Facebook has announced it will introduce warning labels on stories they deem to be fake news, with the help of partisan
fact checking organisations such as Snopes and PolitiFact, reports Breitbart.com.

Business Insider reports that these organisations will include the likes of Snopes, ABC, Politifact, and FactCheck.org, all of
which have records of left-wing partisanship - particularly throughout the 2016 election.

For example, PolitiFact infamously said it was mostly false when Donald Trump claimed in a presidential debate that Hillary
Clinton wanted open borders. PolitiFact made this ruling despite Clinton being on the record at a paid speech saying
My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders.
Trump also said that Russia has 1,800 nuclear warheads and has expanded its arsenal while the U.S. has not. PolitiFact
admitted that Trumps claim was factual, but it rated the statement as half true for supposedly missing the big picture.

In both of these cases, PolitiFact went beyond mere fact-checking and moved the goal posts in ways that benefited Clintons
candidacy.

This type of ideological fact checking went beyond parody during Octobers presidential debates, with NBC taking
Trumps statement that Clinton acid washed her emails (a reference to the data deletion tool BleachBit) 100%
literally and declaring the statement false.

Its Time to Leave Facebook and Discover Alternatives Like Diaspora or Gab.ai

As Facebook turns into an echo chamber of mentally ill liberal whackos, informed people will look elsewhere for uncensored,
independent news. One of the best alternatives for Facebook is Diaspora, a network of independent social media hubs run by
independent, open source organizations like Natural News.

Our Diaspora hub is found at Share.NaturalNews.com, and its rapidly growing. There, youll receive every story we post,
unlike Facebook where 99% of our posts are deliberately buried by Facebook itself.
Gab.ai is also rapidly growing, promising uncensored free speech in a social media format. You can find my articles posted in
real time at these two accounts:

https://gab.ai/healthranger / https://gab.ai/NaturalNews

Join all these sources so that you can stay informed. Understand that Facebook, Google, Twitter, Yahoo and all the other
internet gatekeepers are now engaged in an all out war against independent news, hoping to censor it out of existence.

(Theyve lost the narrative, and they lost the election. Now theyre desperate to destroy whatever voices they dont control
but it will only cause them to lose their audience.)

A Mass Exodus Away From Fakebook

By censoring independent journalism, Facebook is going to lose tens of millions of users who will simply go somewhere
else. The left-wing propaganda swallowers who stay behind at Facebook will simply become increasingly misinformed and
mentally ill as they follow the left-wing media down the rabbit hole of delusional Russian hacker conspiracy theories and
hatred against America, the Constitution and the entire male population in general.

It wont be long, probably, before Snopes officially confirms that having white skin makes you a racist, or that all men are evil
due to their genetics.

Politifact might throw down its own delusional facts that claim Donald Trump was hypnotized by the Russians as a
Manchurian candidate to commit genocide against women (or whatever) whose body parts will be harvested for organ
donations to gray aliens from planet Cockamamie.

I cant wait for Snopes to confirm that people can transform XY chromosomes into XX chromosomes by declaring themselves
to be transgender. Before long, everything pushed by the left - from climate change lunacy to transgender psychosis - will
be rooted in sheer delusion that stands in complete contradiction to scientific reality.

Yet it will all be pushed by Facebook as verified fact. To the utterly insane left, facts are whatever they believe in,
no matter how disconnected from reality they might be.

We have now entered the Orwellian nightmare we all knew was coming. The good news is that you can simply change the
channel and escape the nightmare by avoiding Facebook altogether.

Its time to #DumpFacebook for good.

Related: Over The Top! MSM Calls For Banning Alex Jones From The Airwaves

Facebook Jumps On Fake News Fact-Checker Train, Will Roll Out With PolitiFact
Facebook announced Thursday that it is ready to roll out a process by which alleged fake news
is identified and flagged for users.
Concern for so-called fake news, which has permeated the media landscape since Democrat Hillary Clintons
Election Day loss to Republican Donald Trump, will now be met by Facebook in a major way.

Related: Facebook to Restrict Content by Morphing Into Virtual TV Network

The social media giants newsroom announced that it will partner with third-party organizations to identify hoaxes and
unreliable stories.

We believe providing more context can help people decide for themselves what to trust and what to
share, the company said.

Weve started a program to work with third-party fact checking organizations that are signatories of Poynters
International Fact Checking Code of Principles. Well use the reports from our community, along with other signals,
to send stories to these organizations.

According to Facebook, if the fact checking organizations identify a story as fake, it will get flagged as disputed and there will
be a link to the corresponding article explaining why. Stories that have been disputed may also appear lower in News Feed.

Still, CEO Mark Zuckerbergs company said its workforce and partners cannot become arbiters of truth while essentially
designating them as such. One of the organizations Facebook plans on teaming up with is Snopes, which bills itself as
an essential resource for truth.
Others groups the social media platform will work with include ABC News, FactCheck.org, PolitiFact, and The Associated
Press.

Conservative commentators were quick to put forth a who watches the watchmen counter-argument.

Sometimes the experts are also partisans who have an agenda. That was certainly the case with regard to
Obamacare, wrote Hotairs John Sexton on Thursday.

Health care wonks like Ezra Klein and Jonathan Gruber knew a great deal about the program.

They were also prepared to help their Democratic allies in government lie to the public if necessary to see it
succeed. Its not that they didnt know the truth its just that they werent going to share all of it (except occasionally
to a friendly audience).

Now imagine applying these new rules retroactively to this story. Would any story which challenged Obamas
statement be flagged as fake news prior to 2013?

The Weekly Standards Mark Hemingway concurred.

Two university studies show PolitiFact rates the GOP as liars over Democrats at a rate of 3 to 1 and 2 to 1
respectively. [] I once asked the head of PolitiFact to explain a university study suggesting they were
biased, Mr. Hemingway said in a series of tweets.

He no joke told me that based on what people tell him at parties he thinks hes fair. I could go on but
the idea of PolitiFact censoring political speech at any major social media network is horrifying.

Facebook, for all intents and purposes, dismissed such concerns as hyperbole over a work-in-progress with good intentions.

Were excited about this progress, but we know theres more to be done, the company wrote. Were going to
keep working on this problem for as long as it takes to get it right.
The New Zealand Road Toll Statistics They Tried To Bury
December 20 2016 | From: BreakingViews

I checked the latest road toll statistics a few days ago. Interesting. For the year from January 1, road
deaths were up from 291 last year to 300.

For the 12 months to Tuesday, they were up from 315 to 328. For driver fatalities, the figures were up from 138 to 151
(for the calendar year to date) and from 146 to 170 (over 12 months). These are not big increases, but they appear to
be more than mere statistical blips.

Related: The Rise And Rise Of Control-Freak Government

Even more interesting are some of the figures from a Ministry of Transport booklet called Alcohol and Drugs 2016.

Most of the tables in the booklet pull together figures covering the years 2013-2015 without breaking them down year by year.
They reveal that alcohol and/or drugs contributed to 12 per cent of fatal smashes.

This might come as a surprise. Given the official obsession with alcohol as a risk factor (all those checkpoints, all those TV
ads, all those earnest lectures from senior police officers every holiday period), I imagine most people would have thought the
ratio of deaths attributable to booze must be much higher.
But what especially interested me was whether road deaths involving alcohol had decreased since the legal blood-alcohol limit
was lowered on December 1 2014.

This is information of some importance, since the objective of the law change was to reduce the road toll. But you have to turn
to page 8 before you find any figures relating to the year after the new limits kicked in.

These reveal that the number of alcohol-affected drivers involved in fatal crashes actually increased from 70 to 90 in the 12
months after the new law came into effect.

This was not what we were led to expect. It is the opposite of what the new limit was intended to achieve, which was to deter
people who had been drinking from getting behind the wheel.

Opponents of the law change argued that it would punish safe, law-abiding motorists while hard-core drink-drivers
would continue to flout the law with impunity. That appears to be precisely what has happened.
Drink-drive fatalities last year were the highest since 2010. In the 20-24 age group, the number of alcohol-affected male
drivers involved in fatal crashes increased from 12 to 22 thats nearly double. For men overall, the number was up from 56
to 82.

If the numbers had gone the other way, Im sure the ministry would have been shouting from the rooftops. As it is, its hard to
escape the impression the figures were buried.

We shouldnt be in the least bit surprised that the law change hasnt delivered the promised improvement. Control-
freak policy-makers and poll-driven politicians refuse to accept that human behaviour cant conveniently be changed
by legislative decree.
Related: 8 Ways Control Freak Government Is Sabotaging Freedom And Making Life More Difficult For Us

Thats also apparent from the anti-smacking law (on average, one child continues to be killed by domestic violence every five
weeks while responsible parents risk prosecution for disciplining out-of-control kids with a harmless slap) and from laughably
ineffective dog-control rules, which have entered a whole new realm of fantasy with the expectation that owners of dangerous
dogs will obtain special high-risk dog owner licences, submit their dogs to good citizenship tests, have their properties
inspected and demonstrate they understand their legal obligations.

Yeah, right. Cant you just see gang members meekly queuing at council offices to fill in the forms and register their
blood-flecked pitbulls for obedience training?

Now heres the key point. Any benefits arising from lower blood-alcohol limits and so far there dont seem to be any should
be weighed against the social downsides.

As we brace for the annual bout of Christmas finger-wagging, we should ask whether New Zealanders enjoyment of
life has been unnecessarily diminished just to satisfy the bureaucratic urge to regulate and control.

Theres an economic cost too. Country pubs - the heart of some rural communities - are going out of business and wineries
can expect fewer summer visitors because people fret that a harmless tasting will push them over the limit.

Any supposed benefit must also be weighed against the undoubted change in the public attitude toward the police, who are
increasingly resented as bullies and harassers - unwilling or unable to attend burglaries, but never short of the numbers to run
alcohol checkpoints at all hours of the day, or to hamper law-abiding bar owners in their attempts to run a business, or to
make the staging of public events such as wine festivals so onerous that some participating companies decide that it's just not
worth the effort any more.

Comment: Anyone who still thinks the Police do not have quotas to meet for traffic and other 'offences' is deluded. It
has been established as fact and I and many others have heard it admitted.

QUOTAS = REVENUE

Poll: Americans Backing President-Elect Donald Trump Just Weeks After Bitter
Campaign + A "Soft Coup" Attempt: Furious Trump Slams "Secret" CIA Report Russia
Helped Him Win
December 19 2016 | From: Breitbart / AllNewsPipeline / Various

President-elect Donald J. Trump heads into his Jan. 20 inauguration riding a wave of approval from
Americans, according to a national Remington Research Group poll conducted Dec. 11 and Dec. 12
with 1,945 voters.

America is five weeks removed from one of the most negative presidential campaigns in history, said Titus
Bond, Remingtons director of research.

Related: Top Pollster: Trump Could Create Long Term Majority And Change Politics as We Know It

Donald Trump has been able to improve his image in a very short span and if that continues he will govern with a
mandate, he said. Forty-seven percent of Americans view the president-elect favorably with 41 percent viewing
him unfavorably with 12 percent having no opinion.

The poll carries a 2.3 percent margin of error and was paid for and commissioned independent of any campaign or committee.
Related: Republican Elector Slams Coup Detat Attempt to Overturn a Fair and Legal Election

Bond said the direct reason for Trumps approval rating improving is the success of the stock market.

The Dow Jones Industrial Index closed Nov. 7 at 18,259.60, the day before the presidential election and the DJIA closed Dec.
9 at 19,756.85.

Trumps rebounding image could be attributed directly to the stock market, he said. Fifty-nine percent of
Americans believe stock market gains are attributed to the election of Donald Trump, with 30 percent saying
Trump is solely responsible for the gains. Just 30 percent of Americans believe the election of Trump had nothing
to do with the rise in the stock market.

The poll showed that people are siding with Trump against the press, he said.

Half of all Americans believe the media has been unfair in its coverage of Trump with 39 percent saying the media
has been fair, Bond said.

The mainstream media is viewed negatively by 57 percent of Americans with just 25 percent viewing mainstream
media outlets favorably, he said.

Americans have a mixed opinion of the team the president-elect is putting together for his cabinet, Bond said.

Forty percent of poll participants said they approved of Trumps selections and 43 percent disapproved, he said.
Related: Forbes List of Worlds Most Powerful People: 1. Putin, 2. Trump 48. Obama

Americans are also split when asked if Donald Trump will make America great again, Bond said. Forty-three percent believe
he will and 43 percent do not believe he will, while 46 percent said they think the United States will be more safe under a
Trump presidency and 43 percent believe America will be less safe.

Remington Research Group is a polling firm that specializes in automated IVR technology. Remington Research Group
accurately predicted the outcome of the 2016 Presidential election and its surveys have been featured in
RealClearPolitics, Newsweek, U.S. News & World Report, the Wall Street Journal, 538 and numerous local media throughout
the United States.

Related: NYT Claims Trump a Threat to Democracy

A "Soft Coup" Attempt: Furious Trump Slams "Secret" CIA Report Russia Helped Him
Win

Recently the media propaganda wars escalated after the late Friday release of an article by the
Washington Post(which last week admitted to using unverified, or fake, news in an attempt to smear
other so-called "fake news" sites) according to which a secret CIA assessment found that Russia
sought to tip last months U.S. presidential election in Donald Trumps favor, a conclusion
presented without any actual evidence, and which drew an extraordinary, and angry rebuke from the
president-elects camp.
These are the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, Trumps transition team
said, launching a broadside against the spy agency.

Related: Washington Post goes full treason fabricates entire story falsely claiming Trump won because of
Russian hacks

"The election ended a long time ago in one of the biggest Electoral College victories in history. Its now time to
move on and Make America Great Again.

The Washington Post report comes after outgoing President Barack Obama ordered a review of all cyberattacks that took
place during the 2016 election cycle, amid growing calls from Congress for more information on the extent of Russian
interference in the campaign.

The newspaper cited officials briefed on the matter as saying that individuals with connections to Moscow provided WikiLeaks
with email hacked from the Democratic National Committee, Democratic nominee Hillary Clintons campaign chief and others.

Without a shred of evidence provided, and despite Wikileaks' own on the record denial that the source of the emails was
Russian, the WaPo attack piece claims the email messages were steadily leaked out via WikiLeaks in the months before the
election, damaging Clintons White House run.

Essentially, according to the WaPo, the Russians aim was to help Donald Trump win and not just undermine the U.S.
electoral process, hinting at a counter-Hillary intent on the side of Putin.

It is the assessment of the intelligence community that Russias goal here was to favor one candidate
over the other, to help Trump get elected, the newspaper quoted a senior U.S. official briefed on an
intelligence presentation last week to key senators as saying. Thats the consensus view.
CIA agents told the lawmakers it was quite clear - although it was not reported exactly what made it "clear" - that electing
Trump was Russias goal, according to officials who spoke to the Post, citing growing evidence from multiple sources.

And yet, key questions remain unanswered, and the CIAs report fell short of being a formal U.S. assessment
produced by all 17 intelligence agencies the newspaper said, for two reasons.

As we reported in November "The "Fact" That 17 Intelligence Agencies Confirmed Russia is Behind the Email Hacks
Isnt ActuallyA "Fact", and then also because aside from so-called "consensus", there is - once again - no
evidence,otherwise the appropriate agencies would have long since released it, and this is nothing more than another
propaganda attempt to build tension with Russia.

In fact, the WaPo admits as much in the following text, which effectively destroys the article's entire argument:

"The CIA presentation to senators about Russias intentions fell short of a formal U.S. assessment produced by all
17 intelligence agencies. A senior U.S. official said there were minor disagreements among intelligence officials
about the agencys assessment, in part because some questions remain unanswered.

For example, intelligence agencies do not have specific intelligence showing officials in the Kremlin
directing the identified individuals to pass the Democratic emails to WikiLeaks, a second senior U.S.
official said.

Those actors, according to the official, were one step removed from the Russian government, rather than
government employees. Moscow has in the past used middlemen to participate in sensitive intelligence operations
so it has plausible deniability.

...
Ill be the first one to come out and point at Russia if theres clear evidence, but there is no clear
evidence - even now, said Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee and a
member of the Trump transition team. Theres a lot of innuendo, lots of circumstantial evidence, thats it.

And since even the WaPo is forced to admit that intelligence agents dont have the proof that Russian officials directed the
identified individuals to supply WikiLeaks with the hacked Democratic emails, the best it can do is speculate based on
circumstantial inferences, especially since, as noted above, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has denied links with Russias
government, putting the burden of proof on the side of those who challenge the Wikileaks narrative.

So far that proof has not been provided.

Related: Trumps Showdown with the Deep State

Nonetheless, at the White House, Deputy Press Secretary Eric Schultz said Obama called for the cyberattacks review
earlier this week to ensure the integrity of our elections.

This report will dig into this pattern of malicious cyberactivity timed to our elections, take stock of our defensive
capabilities and capture lessons learned to make sure that we brief members of Congress and stakeholders as
appropriate, Schultz said.

Taking the absurdity to a whole new level, Obama wants the report completed before his term ends on January 20, by none
other than a proven and confirmed liar: "The review will be led by James Clapper, the outgoing director of national
intelligence, officials said."

In other words, the report that the Kremlin stole the election should be prepared by the time Trump is expected to be
sworn in.
We are going to make public as much as we can, the spokesman added. This is a major priority for the
president.

The move comes after Democrats in Congress pressed the White House to reveal details, to Congress or to the public, of
Russian hacking and disinformation in the election.

On Oct. 7, one month before the election, the Department of Homeland Security and the Director of National Intelligence
announced that:

The Russian Government directed the recent compromises of emails from U.S. persons and institutions, including
from U.S. political organizations. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the U.S. election
process, they said.

Trump dismissed those findings in an interview published Wednesday by Time magazine for its Person of the Year award.
Asked if the intelligence was politicized, Trump answered: I think so.

Related: 2016 Person Of The Year - Donald Trump

I dont believe they interfered, he said. It could be Russia. And it could be China. And it could be some guy in his
home in New Jersey.

Worried that Trump will sweep the issue under the rug after his inauguration, seven Democrats on the Senate Intelligence
Committee called on Nov. 29 for the White House to declassify what it knows about Russian interference. The seven have
already been briefed on the classified details, suggesting they believe there is more information the public should know.
On Tuesday this week, leading House Democrats called on Obama to give members of the entire Congress a classified
briefing on Russian interference, from hacking to the spreading of fake news stories to mislead U.S. voters.

Republicans in Congress have also promised hearings into Russian activities once the new administration comes in. Obamas
homeland security adviser Lisa Monaco said the cyberinterference goes back to the 2008 presidential race, when both the
Obama and John McCain campaigns were hit by malicious computer intrusions.

...

An interesting aside to emerge from last night's hit piece and the Trump team response is that there is now a full blown turf
war between Trump and the CIA, as NBC's Chuck Todd observed in a series of late Friday tweets:
To which Glenn Greenwald provided the best counterargument:
However, of the mini Tweetstorm, this was the most important aspect: the veiled suggestion that in addition to Russia, both
the FBI and the Obama presidency prevented Hillary from becoming the next US president...

...which in light of these stunning new unproven and baseless allegations, she may very well have renewed aspirations
toward.
...

So while there is no "there" there following the WaPo's latest attempt to fan the rarging fires of evidence-free propaganda, or
as the WaPo itself would say "fake news", here is why the story has dramatic implications. First, the only two quotes which
matter:

"...There is no clear evidence - even now, said Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), the chairman of the House
Intelligence Committee and a member of the Trump transition team. Theres a lot of innuendo, lots of
circumstantial evidence, thats it.

...

"...Obama wants the report before he leaves office Jan. 20, Monaco said. The review will be led by [PROVEN
LIAR] James Clapper, the outgoing director of national intelligence, officials said."

And then the summary:

1. Announce "consensus" (not unanimous) "conclusion" based in circumstantial evidence now, before the
Electoral College vote, then write a report with actual details due by Jan 20.

2. Put a proven liar in charge of writing the report on Russian hacking.

3. Fail to mention that not one of the leaked DNC or Podesta emails has been shown to be inauthentic. So the
supposed Russian hacking simply revealed truth about Hillary, DNC, and MSM collusion and corruption.

4. Fail to mention that if hacking was done by or for US government to stop Hillary, blaming the Russians would be
the most likely disinformation used by US agencies.

5. Expect every pro-Hillary lapdog journalist - which is virtually all of them - in America will hyperventilate (Twitter is
currently on fire) about this latest fact-free, anti-Trump political stunt for the next nine days.

Or, as a reader put it, this is a soft coup attempt by leaders of Intel community and Obama Admin to influence the
Electoral College vote, similar to the 1960s novel "Seven Days in May."

Related: Michigan Elector: Anti-Trump Celebrities Are Not Smarter Than the American People

A CIA-Led Coup Against American Democracy Is Unfolding Before Our Eyes +


The Albuquerque Journal Asks The Relevant Question: Just Who Is Undermining
Election? Russians Or CIA?
December 19 2016 | From: PaulCraigRoberts / AlbJournal

This article by Moon of Alabama is not conspiracy theory: The "Elite" Coup of 2016 - Read it
carefully. Check out the links.
Putin stands in brazen defiance of the New World Order globalist agenda - another thing that makes him a target

The article is a documented and accurate description of a coup that is underway. The extraordinary lies that are
being perpetrated by the media and by members of the US government have as their obvious purpose the prevention
of a Donald Trump presidency.

Related: Obama Must Declassify Evidence of Russian Hacking

There is no other reason for the extraordinary blatant lies for which there is not a shred of evidence. Indeed, there is massive
real evidence to the contrary. Yet the coup proceeds and gathers steam.

President Eisenhower warned us more than a half century ago of the danger that the military/security complex presents to US
democracy. In the decades since Eisenhowers warning, the military/security complex has become more powerful than the
American people and is demonstrating its power by overturning a presidential election.

Will the coup succeed?

In my opinion, former and present members of the US government and the media would not dare to so obviously and
openly participate in a coup against democracy and an elected president unless they expect the coup to succeed.

It is an easy matter for the ruling interests to bribe electors to vote differently than their states. The cost of the bribes is
miniscule compared to the wealth and income streams that a trillion dollar annual budget provides to the military/security
complex.

The fake news of a Putin/Trump election-stealing plot generated by unsupported allegations of present and former members
of US intelligence, the lame-duck President Obama, and the presstitute media provide the cover for electors to break with
precedent in order to save America from a Russian stooge.
Related: Larry Nichols: Globalists Readying Lawsuits to Shut Down Free Press

The CIA-controlled European media, the politicians in Washingtons European vassal states, NATO officials, and the
brainwashed European peoples will support the coup against Trump.

The only ones speaking against the coup are the voters who elected Trump - all of whom are alleged to have been deceived
by Russian fake news - the Russian government, and the 200 websites falsely described by the Washington Post and the
secret organization PropOrNot as Russian agents.

In other words, those objecting to the coup are the ones described by the coup leaders as those who made the coup
necessary.

I do not know that the coup will succeed, but looking at the commitment so many high level people have made to the
coup, I conclude that those bringing the coup expect it to succeed.

Therefore, we should take very seriously the expectation of success that those who control levers of power are
demonstrating.

Related Articles:

Obama Vows Retaliation Against "Russia Hacking", To Hold Press Conference On Friday

New York Times To Vacate 8 Floors From Its Iconic Building In Manhattan

The Albuquerque Journal Asks The Relevant Question: Just Who Is Undermining
Election? Russians Or CIA?
Congress needs to dust off its Magic 8 Ball. At this point, how else are our elected representatives
going to get to the bottom of allegations that Russia and its president, Vladimir Putin, tried to
influence the U.S. general election?
After all, the Central Intelligence Agency isnt being very open at least not with our elected representatives.

Related: Senate Quietly Passes The "Countering Disinformation And Propaganda Act"

Instead of briefing the House Intelligence Committee about the alleged Russian role in hacked emails made public during the
campaign which Democrats desperately seek to blame for Hillary Clintons loss the agency is leaking conclusions
without facts to the Washington Post, New York Times and television networks.

The media, naturally, are quick to report the anonymous bits of blame Putin information to the public.

So to the extent Putin meddled, our own spies have at least matched his efforts to discredit our electoral system.

To recap: Private emails from the Democratic National Committee and Clinton campaign were made public via
WikiLeaks, allegedly through hacking, even though the FBI had tried to warn the DNC back in September 2015 of
problems with its security system.

The agency couldnt get past the partys technical help desk harking back to Hillarys email security problems on
her own private server.
Pizzagate Podesta

Related: Heres the Public Evidence Russia Hacked the DNC - Its Not Enough

The media reported on the leaks daily and if a reporter had obtained the same information from inside sources,
there would be no controversy at all.

Todays uproar is over the source not the substance.

But the CIAs alleged conclusion that Russia intervened to help Trump win does not square with comments made
Nov. 17 by James Clapper, director of National Intelligence. He said he lacked good insight about whether there
was a connection between the WikiLeaks releases and Russia.

Congressional Republican leaders are taking the allegations seriously. The Russians are not our friends, Senate Majority
Leader Mitch McConnell said. House Speaker Paul Ryan called any Russian intervention;

"Especially problematic because, under President Putin, Russia has been an aggressor that consistently
undermines American interests.

But Intelligence Committee member Peter King of New York flatly accused the U.S. intelligence community of waging a
disinformation campaign aimed at undermining Trumps credibility if not changing the course of the Electoral College.

Not surprisingly, President Obama is seizing a newfound political opportunity and is taking a new interest despite
earlier claims of knowing all along of Russian shenanigans but choosing not to go public with whatever evidence he
had none of which he has produced.
This is from a man who plays imaginary golf

He has ordered an investigation into whether Russia has attempted to influence U.S. elections going back to
2008. He said the reported CIA findings should come as no surprise to anyone, as suspicions that Russia was trying to
influence the election were widely reported before the general election. Clinton herself spoke frequently about the possibility.

President-elect Donald Trump rejected the idea that Russia helped him win as ridiculous.

Concerning the source of the leaked emails, on Sunday he told Chris Wallace of Fox News;

"Personally, it could be Russia. I dont really think it is. But who knows? They dont know and I dont know.

The source of the campaign leaks remains an interesting question, but one unlikely to be answered credibly unless the CIA
coughs up its findings to Congress. Cooperation also might help answer the question of possible Russian motives if it was
involved:

Was it to cast doubt on the U.S. election system? If so, it was highly successful with the help of our own intelligence
community and desperate Democrats who simply cant accept that Trump won 306 Electoral College votes.

Though the CIA based its supposed findings of pro-Trump intervention on the fact that no Republican emails were leaked
before the election, the Republican National Committee says it wasnt hacked.

And Wikileaks co-founder Julian Assange stands firm in his claim the Russians were not the source of the leaks. Cyber
hacking has become one of the mainstays of life Yahoo most recently was hacked of more than one billion user
accounts.

And intervention into foreign elections is something many nations, including the United States, do regularly. Obama recently
tried to influence the Brexit vote.
And while nobody should feel good about foreign interests intervening in U.S. elections, the reluctance of the U.S.
intelligence community to share its information with official sources charged with making decisions about national
security, while leaking information via media outlets, is very disturbing, raising the spectre of a political coup by our
nations intelligence forces.

Related: Only a Counter-Coup Can Save American Democracy

Putin Lashes Out At Obama: "Show Some Proof Or Shut Up" + Someone Has Officially
Called The CIAs Bluff Over Russia
December 18 2016 | From: Zerohedge / TheAntiMedia

Putin has had enough of the relentless barrage of US accusations that he, personally, "hacked the
US presidential election."
The Russian president's spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, said on Friday that the US must either stop accusing Russia of
meddling in its elections or prove it. Peskov said it was "indecent" of the United States to "groundlessly" accuse
Russia of intervention in its elections.

Comment: If watching the 6pm news was not comical before it sure as hell is now. The Western Cabal establishment
is so desperate and pathetic, one must ask - just who among us anymore is so stupid as to believe this utter
propaganda - bullshit?

Related: Treason: Left-wing media attempting a soft coup in America by hyperventilating over self-contrived
Russian conspiracy fabrication

You need to either stop talking about it, or finally show some kind of proof. Otherwise it just looks very
indecent, Peskov told Reporters in Tokyo where Putin is meeting with Japan PM Abe, responding to the
latest accusations that Russia was responsible for hacker attacks.

Peskov also warned that Obama's threat to "retaliate" to the alleged Russian hack is "against both American and international
law", hinting at open-ended escalation should Obama take the podium to officially launch cyberwar against Russia.
Previously, on Thursday, Peskov told the AP the report was "laughable nonsense", while Russian foreign ministry spox
Maria Zakharova accused "Western media" of being a "shill" and a "mouthpiece of various power groups", and added that;

It's not the general public who's being manipulated," Zakharova said.

"The general public nowadays can distinguish the truth. It's the mass media that is manipulating
themselves."

Meanwhile, on Friday Sergei Lavrov, Russia's foreign minister told state television network, Russia 24, he was "dumbstruck"
by the NBC report which alleges that Russian President Vladimir Putin was personally involved in an election hack.

The report cited U.S. intelligence officials that now believe with a "high level of confidence" that Putin became personally
involved in a secret campaign to influence the outcome of the U.S. presidential election.

"I think this is just silly, and the futility of the attempt to convince somebody of this is absolutely
obvious,"Lavrov added, according to the news outlet.

As a reminder, last night Obama vowed retaliatory action against Russia for its meddling in the US presidential election last
month. "I think there is no doubt that when any foreign government tries to impact the integrity of our elections that we need
to take action and we will at a time and place of our own choosing," Obama told National Public Radio.

US intelligence agencies in October pinned blame on Russia for election-related hacking. At the time, the White House vowed
a "proportional response" to the cyberactivity, though declined to preview what that response might entail.
Meanwhile, both President-elect Donald Trump, the FBI, and the ODNI have dismissed the CIA's intelligence community's
assessment, for the the same reason Putin finally lashed out at Obama: there is no proof.

That, however, has never stopped the US from escalating a geopolitical conflict to the point of war, or beyond, so pay close
attention to what Obama says this afternoon.

According to an NBC report, a team of analysts at Eurasia Group said in a note on Friday that they believe the outgoing
administration is likely to take action which could result in a significant barrier for Trump's team once he takes office
in January.

"It is unlikely that U.S. intelligence reports will change Trump's intention to initiate a rapprochement with Moscow,
but the congressional response following its own investigations could obstruct the new administration's
effort," Eurasia Group analysts added.

At the same time, Wikileaks offered its "validation" services, tweeting that "Obama should submit any Putin documents to
WikiLeaks to be authenticated to our standards if he wants them to be seen as credible."
We doubt Obama would take the whistleblower organization on its offer, even if he did have any Putin documents to
authenticate.

Someone Has Officially Called The CIAs Bluff Over Russia

The scapegoating of Russia is now so widespread, Dirty Wars author and investigative journalist
Jeremy Scahill took to The Intercept to call the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) on its bluff.

In the article, Obama Must Declassify Evidence Of Russian Hacking, Scahill and Jon Schwartz called out U.S.
intelligence agencies for their record of deceit, asserting that the American people are not going to simply take their
word for it.
Related: Insane: Obama Threatens Russia Over Election Hacking Conspiracy

"U.S. intelligence agencies have repeatedly demonstrated that they regularly both lie and get things
horribly wrong, the article argues.

But when it comes to the CIAs case against Russias alleged interference with the latest U.S. presidential elections, its
impossible to claim the hearsay is based on facts if evidence is not made available to support the agencys claims.

Nevertheless, Scahill and Schwartz argue, its possible that Russia may have pulled some strings. But even if the Kremlin had
its reasons and acted on them, America is the country with the long history of election meddling - not Russia.

Take Hillary Clintons comments on the Palestinian elections, for instance. A leaked audio recording from 2006 revealed then-
senator Clinton advocated doing something to determine who was going to win in Palestines elections.

Comment: We are witnessing the final stage of the fall of the Khazarian / Zionist / Illuminati Cabal - and they are
throwing one hell of a tantrum on their way down in a desperate attempt to escape the inevitablity of their demise.

And yet here she is, hoping to use the Russia did it talking point to give censorship a boost. The CIA has its
own history of meddling in foreign elections.

In order to give Barack Obamas administration that extra push to release any proof the CIA has that the 2016 U.S. elections
were rigged, the Intercepts duo encouraged feds or whistleblowers to use the publications secure drop link, where a
patriotic whistleblower within the U.S. intelligence community may drop the leak that proves Russia is behind President-elect
Donald Trumps win. [W]e will verify its legitimacy and publish it, they added.
Related: Russian hack narrative revealed to be elaborate media hoax - leaks came from Bernie Sanders insider

This response seems fitting. After all, assertions are not evidence, and major publications like the Washington
Posthave been basing their Russia-related reports using nothing but assumptions.

Using an anonymous source, for instance, the WaPo reported that:

[U.S. intelligence] agencies have identified individuals with connections to the Russian government who provided
WikiLeaks with thousands of hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee and others.

But Reuters has since reported that [the] overseers of the U.S. intelligence community have not embraced a CIA
assessment that Russian cyber attacks were aimed at helping Republican President-elect Donald Trump win the
2016 election. This means the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) has not endorsed [the CIAs]
assessment because of a lack of conclusive evidence.

Caitlin Johnstone put it best in an article for Newslogue:

"Believing something the CIA says is like trusting a meth addict with your car, and trusting the CIA when
theyre working with the Washington Post is like trusting a meth addict with your car and leaving your kid
in the back seat with the house keys and money for Taco Bell.

Unless proof is produced either by the CIA or a whistleblower, partisan voices crying wolf in Washington and in the media will
continue to run on empty, feeding their base with nothing but fake news. But wasnt that what we were told to unite over so
we could fight it effectively? Heres your chance, Mr. President.
Why Now? Tangled Webs: Google, Microsoft, Facebook, The Internet Giveaway, And
The Wild, Wild West Of Information
December 17 2016 | From: AmericanPolicy

The use of lies and deception, or as the new term coming into vogue; fake news, has been a
standard tool of the trade for over a century by the government and their willing and/or unwilling
stooges in the mainstream media.

A few examples include Newspaper owners William Randolph Hearst and Joseph Pulitzer, with the unspoken
blessings of US President, William McKinley, spreading lies to stir up the masses enough to start a war with Spain.

Related: The Oppression of the Internet is Global

This allowed McKinley to start an American empire by taking over the Philippines, Guam, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico at the close
of the 19th century. In the following decades, the media has obediently followed along coving up such things as the
fraudulent Gulf of Tonkin incident, the governmental attack on the Branch Davidians, 9/11, and the Obamacare fiasco.

In spite of the lies and distortions presented by the government then spread by an obedient media, there were still
some journalists who were doing their job by reporting the truth.

In 1983, fifty companies controlled 90% of the American media, today it is just six multinational corporations. They are
Viacom, Comcast, Time-Warner, Disney, CBS, and News Corp and these companies are working very hard to make sure that
the news you hear is the news they and the government want you to hear.

From the anti-Muslim video that caused the killing of four Americans at Benghazi, lying about the state of the economy
before the 2008 meltdown, to the massive push to promote Obamacare, the main stream media is relentless in pushing the
government / corporatist agenda to its audience.
This control is the dream of every tyrannical state in history and the US government has almost achieved it.

Only, they have, like the American Army in the WWII Battle of Arnhem, pushed their power too far and too fast causing the
American people to no longer trust the main stream media.

In the spring of 2016, a major poll was conducted by the Media Insight Project, a partnership of The Associated Press-NORC
Center for Public Affairs Research and the American Press Institute; they found that just 6% of those polled have confidence
in the main stream media for news.

The bias and outright lies have become so bad that even a 30 year insider like Sharyl Attkisson commented on it:

There is unprecedented, I believe, influence on the media, not just the news, but the images you see everywhere.
By well-orchestrated and financed campaign of special interests, political interests and corporations. I think all of
that comes into play.
ICANN is arguably the single most powerful institution in the world - Jeff Baron

In every format, the main stream media is losing patrons. From failing newspapers to falling television ratings, the old model is
dying because of the internet.

The Internet has become the primary source for information for a huge percentage of Westerners today.

In fact, in the last 25 years the internet has transformed the world. It has completely revamped the way people do
business, communicate, purchase household goods, plan vacations, find friends, look up information and just about
every human activity imaginable.

Since it first became available for average people, the internet has been a way to find information the elites did not want
exposed and they have been looking to shut down that freedom of information for years.

Subsequently with the support of numerous multinational corporations like Microsoft, Google, Dell, Yahoo, Amazon,
and Facebook along with the blessing from globalist mouth pieces like the Council on Foreign Relations, the LA
Times, NBC, the International Chamber of Commerce and Human Rights Watch, President Obama failed to renew the
contract with ICANN effectively giving the control over the internet to a private company.
That company is ICANN (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) and it is a CA based nonprofit corporation.
In 1998, the Commerce Department began contracting with ICANN, to take over management of IANA (The Internet Assigned
Numbers Authority) and the internets domain name system.

The US Commerce Department has, for the most part, let ICANN govern itself, but it maintained the authority to pull the
nonprofits contract.

In essence ICANN records the numbers (easier for computers to use) using words (easier for humans to use)
through DNS.

Domain name system (DNS) is basically a directory for internet-connected devices that helps translate domain names to
numerical IP addresses. Without DNS it is difficult for people to access websites as it requires remembering large numbers of
IP address, a series of numbers such as 194.66.82.10.

So President Obama just ceded power over the allocation of domain names from Google.com to your churchs website
without the consent of Congress and over the objections of millions of citizens.
Those supporting the transfer are quick to report that there is nothing to fear from this transfer, after all ICANN is a private
company under a global multi-stakeholder group to oversee its Board of Directors. What can possibly go wrong with the
internet in the hands of a private company? Plenty.

ICANN is first and foremost, a complete monopoly. It has exclusive rights to allow and renew domain names and that
is a power it has not always been used benevolently.

It also has complete control over how much to charge for a top level domain such as .com, .net, .biz and several
times in the past, it has abused those powers.

For instance it allowed a top level domain named .sucks to be purchased by the company Vox Populi which charges $2,500 to
protect a companys or individuals name from being purchased and slandered with a .sucks after it, then failed to rein the
company in when it was running an extortion operation.

ICANN has also been accused numerous times of siding with those who have the most to pay its fees and since it costs over
a million dollars to have ICANN officially look into a complaint, not many decisions are overturned.

Another troubling aspect of ICANN is that ICANN has made a fortune off of its rapidly expanding list of Generic Top Level
Domain Names (gTLDs). Names like .lawyer; .google; .africa are going for at least $200,000 each and then annual fees.

The .web domain brought $135,000,000 into their coffers giving them not only a complete monopoly on issuing domains but
the means to create a very monopolistic self-supporting group of elites.

Amazon, the giant online retailer, applied to register the gTLD .amazon. ICANN has written limitations that govern the sale of
a domain name but since the name .amazon does not fall, into any of the categories that are forbidden there should have no
problems with Amazons request.

Only there was, the South American countries of Brazil and Peru, through the interest group Government Advisory Committee
(GAC), declared this application to be illegal, based on the fact that the Amazon River is a geographical area inhabited by
some 30million people.

ICANN sided with the governments proving that the advantage of being a monopoly is that you get to make up rules
as you go along. Amazon is now in the process of suing ICANN over the matter.

The exact same thing happened to the sports company called Patagonia when it filed for the .patagonia domain. The
governments of Argentina and Chile objected and ICANN decided against selling the name to the company.

This trend shows that not only are rules made to be broken but governments are meant to be appeased.
This pattern is more than disturbing considering that since 1998, nations that routinely censor the internet of their citizens
including Russia, China, Iran and Saudi Arabia have pushed extremely hard to place the functions of ICANN under the control
of the U.N.s Russian dominated International Telecommunications Union (ITU) and President Obama may very well have just
handed them their chance.

For, as stated above, ICANN holds a COMPLETE monopoly over the World Wide Web root zone and complete
monopolies in private hands are illegal in most of the world. When operating under contract with the Commerce
Department, ICANN becomes a legal monopolist as it becomes an instrumentality of government.

As L. Gordon Crovitz points out in his article U.S. Surrender: Internet Giveaway to the U.N.?, once ICANN became
independent, they lost that umbrella of US Government protection leaving them open to legal challenges from every despotic
government on earth looking to force them under the control of the United Nations.

Hence President Obama, in another case of: if you want your doctor, you can keep your doctor;

Simply lied again when he pledged that ICANN would not replace U.S. control for a government-led or an inter-
governmental organization solution.

This fact is verified on 10/14/16 When Obama gave a speech in Pittsburg, PA in which he glorified the days of the three major
networks delivering the news that most people trusted.

Obama went on to say:

We are going to have to rebuild within this wild-wild-west-of-information flow some sort of curating
function that people agree to.

There has to be, I think, some sort of way in which we can sort through information that passes some
basic truthiness tests and those that we have to discard, because they just dont have any basis in
anything thats actually happening in the world, Obama added.

That is hard to do, but I think its going to be necessary, its going to be possible. The answer is
obviously not censorship, but its creating places where people can say this is reliable and Im still able
to argue safely about facts and what we should do about it. he added.
There should be no longer any doubt as to why Obama went against Congress and the people to give away the internet; we
can no longer have the wild-wild-west-of-information flow out there to inform the people of what is really going on in the
world.

German Chancellor Merkel, speaking at a press conference with out-going President Obama on 11-17-16, reinforced what
ship we will soon see coming to the internet port; censorship. She christened the surge of populist or right wing politics as a
wave that engulfs us that emanates from the United States.

Look at the European parliament. There are a lot of people who are looking for simplistic solutions and are
preaching simplistic solutions which are very unfriendly policies. We have them here in Europe; too, we have them
in Germany too.

Digitization is a disruptive technological force that brings about deep-seated change and transformation in society.
Look at the history of the printing press, when this was invented what kind of consequences it had, or
industrialization, what consequences that had.

Very often, it led to enormous transformational processes within individual societies and it took a while until
societies learned to find the right kinds of policies to contain this, to manage and steer this. We live in a period of
profound transformation.

Directing her ire against the Germans who are angered with her flooding Germany with Muslim invaders and massive job loss,
she lashed out against PEGIDA, the anti-mass migration and counter-Islamisation movement, repeating their slogan:Wir Sind
Das Volk - We Are The People - the chancellor said:

The most important and noble task of politicians these days is to see that each and every person can find his
place. But those who purportedly belong to certain groups say we are the people, and not others.

In another of those frequent ironies so often dumped on the citizens, Merkel, a former (?) East German communist,
now says of PEGIDA:
At the time when we had [this saying] in the GDR [East Germany] when the people stood in the streets and said
we are the people it filled me with great joy, but the fact these people have hijacked it does not fill me with joy.

How long will it be before other world leaders join Ms. Merkel and president Obama in demanding web censorship?

Certainly foreign media is now calling for it as Germanys Zeit newspaper published a piece calling for controls to prevent a
German Donald Trump, while Britains Independent former newspaper website published a list of fake news sites which
they claimed may have swayed votes towards Donald Trump.

Even the British news outlet The Guardian is in on the fake news bandwagon. That list is the same list being circulated by
Google and Facebook.

Consequently, now, the very instrument that has become the great equalizing force against corporatism/globalisms control
over the main stream media might now become just another weapon in their arsenal of global censorship.

Unfortunately, it is only one of several ways the internet is being manipulated for corporatist/governmental advantage. One
only needs to look at the two most popular search engines and the most popular social media site to see complete censorship
in action.

What kind of drug does one have to take to believe Microsoft is a friend? - Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Google, Bing and Facebook have an unbroken record of suppressing sites, postings and searches that dont follow their world
view. Of the three, Bing is certainly the smallest but being part of Microsoft, perhaps they try harder. Bing claims to be neutral
and in fact, the subscriber can set the search engine to their own preference of conservative; liberal; Christian; etc. so how
can they be biased?

Well the Bing headline on August 16, 2016 for the conservative bias setting in Bing featured three negative Trump articles:

Donald Trump plots strategy on ISIS - and campaign revival (CNN)


Analysis: Making Sense of Donald Trumps Disjointed Foreign Policy Pitch (NBC News)

Early Voting Limits Donald Trumps Time to Turn Campaign Around (New York Times)

The first headline implies Trumps campaign had stalled and needs revival. The second inferred Trumps foreign policy was
chaotic and the third noted that the early vote will give Hillary such a lead that discouraged Trump supporters wont vote.

Microsoft, donated $650,000 to the Hillary Clinton campaign and both Bill and Melinda Gates were considered as possible
Vice Presidential running mates for her Presidential campaign.

This is the Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft, whose obsession with globalism and censorship is well known and on Sept. 20,
2016 at a conference in Vancouver, B.C. he openly stated that opposition to globalism is a huge concern, and says the
underlying issues of resistance to it warrant a close examination.

This is the same Bill Gates that along with Steve Ballmer (Microsoft CEO) spoke at the World Economic Forum in Davos,
Switzerland in early 2015 on the critical need for immigration and more H-1B visas because of a shortage of high tech
workers, and then laid off some 18,000 American high tech workers.

In 2010, China demanded that Google and Microsoft censor the results of their search engines in China.
Google resisted but Microsoft was more than willing to go along. Bill Gates even criticized Googles decision to uncensor their
search engine in China by saying:

Youve got to decide: do you want to obey the laws of the countries youre in or not? If not, you may not end up
doing business there.

Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer then said If the Chinese government gives us proper legal notice, well take that
piece of information out of the Bing search engine.

Chinese President Xi Jinping also stopped in for dinner at Bill Gates house in September of 2015 before meeting with the
heads of Microsoft, Google and Facebook amongst other business leaders.

So great is the Bing Censorship of China that the Chinese Web anti-censorship monitoring service has gone to great lengths
to show that Bing censors content in China even more than the Chinese State owned search engine Baidu does. But dont
worry; Microsofts support of the ICANN was completely in the name of a free internet.
Privacy is no longer a social norm. - Mark Zuckerberg

Facebook is just as bad. In addition to being an outspoken advocate of globalism and a liberal, Facebook CEO Mark
Zuckerberg is the controlling force behind the most powerful social media platform ever created. Facebook controls the global
dialogue used by over a billion people with an invisible touch that is unprecedented.

Almost two-thirds of American adults get news from social media, with 44% of them getting their news from
Facebook alone.

This means Facebooks algorithms dominate the information of almost half the American public. As Gizmodos Michael Nuez
puts it, with Facebook, we dont know what were not seeing.

And he controls that platform with an iron grip.

Facebook has conducted numerous studies to better understand how information spreads in a social network. For
instance, in 2010 Facebook conducted a secret experiment on 61 million unknowing people by tampering with their
news feeds to find out how successfully it could manipulate the real-world voting habits of those people.

Later, Facebook released the findings and claimed that they increased voter turnout by more than 340,000 people. Facebook
regularly skews the news it posts; in 2012 it manipulated the feeds on 700,000 people without their consent to make them feel
sad and then published the results in the respected (?) scientific journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
The results showed fairly conclusively that Facebook had found the key to intentionally influencing peoples emotions. That
year they did the same type of experiment on 1.9 million people to influence the US election. In 2014 Facebook used the
rainbow flag as another experiment to get people to be more accepting of same-sex marriage.

Facebook has made an empire of selling information about every person they can. It openly manipulates
the feeds and posts they allow on Facebook and the posts people are allowed to place for other members of Facebook.

Facebook is now reluctantly being forced to manipulate their algorithm to crack down on fake news being posted on
Facebook.

Though this sounds like a noble goal, the potential for censorship is unmistakable, especially when one looks at the
list of websites they plan on censoring.

The sites Facebook and Google are going to censor as fake was created by a self-proclaimed feminist assistant
professor at Merrimack College who did not like the sites her students citing in their research papers.

Sites like Breitbart; Realfarmacy; Lew Rockwell; Zerohedge; and World Net Daily.

Though all have posted articles that have proven to be false, Facebook has no problem with posting articles from even less
reliable news site like USA Today; MSNBC; CNN; BBC and the New York Times. Google is now planning on using this same
list to censor content. It does not take a rocket scientist to see where this censorship is headed.

In fact, in one of the most blatant acts of fake news to ever hit the news media was perpetrated by the New York Times in
early 1957, when a former war correspondent, Herbert L. Matthews, wrote numerous articles filled with the glories and praises
of a young Cuban revolutionary named Fidel Castro.

Article after article spewing from Matthews typewriter glowed with tales that eventually created a Robin Hood persona for a
murdering communist thug. It cannot be understated how important the fake news was to propel Castro into power. Yet
the New York Times stands as a purveyor of honest journalism according to our Ministry of truth.
The New York Times; Unrepentant Communist Enabler

We know where you are. We know where youve been. We can more or less know what youre thinking about. - Eric
Schmidt

The last of the big three masters of manipulation is Google, and they are arguably the biggest of the bunch. Google CEO Eric
Schmidt is about as open with his liberal bias as one could ever be. The Bilderberg attendee bankrolled a startup company
called The Groundwork to provide technical experts Hillary Clinton needed to run her campaign. Schmidt was instrumental in
getting Barack Obama elected both times as he was the main supplier of technical experts for all three campaigns.

Technology is right up Schmidts alley as Google is the defacto gateway to information. Google averages some 40,000
search queries every second equaling over 3.5 billion searches per day and 1.2 trillion searches per year worldwide.

Google conducts over 64% of all internet searches in the US and over 90% in some countries. Google has indexed some 45
billion web pages while Bing, its closest competitor has only 14 billion.

Of course the 45 billion web pages are only part of the Schmidt plan to control everything on earth. Schmidt has
stated that privacy is an excuse to hide wrongdoing:

If you have something that you dont want anyone to know, maybe you shouldnt be doing it in the first place.

In his plan to deprive you of your privacy, Schmidt has employed some of the worlds top technocrats to find ever
more powerful ways to pry into every corner of your life since Googles business is, literally, mass surveillance, and
they have become amazingly good at it.
They are also a contractor to the US Government, including the NSA and several military contractors as well. When
Edward Snowden revealed to the world the unimaginable world of government spying on US citizens, he also
revealed that the NSA has direct access to the information stored on Googles computers as they do to Facebook,
Twitter, Bing and every other company storing online information on you.

In a US News and World Report article published on 6/22/16, contributor Robert Epstein wrote an extremely troubling article
on just how powerful Google is. According to Epstein:

When Googles employees or algorithms decide to block our access to information about a news item, political
candidate or business, it causes opinions and votes to shift, reputations to be ruined and businesses to crash and
burn. Because online censorship is entirely unregulated at the moment, victims have little or no recourse when
they have been harmed.

Epstein then exposes blacklists that Google wields like Jack the Ripper did his knives with the first being the autocomplete
blacklist. This one is simple enough; it quietly guides the searcher to where the company wants you to go.

From directing away from negative articles on Hillary Clinton to pointing to negative articles on Donald Trump, there
is little doubt that Google had a large impact on the recent US election. In any search you make, the algorithm is your
spiritual guide.

Google maps is a stalkers dream showing just about every house and area in the US and huge sections of the world. They
did not ask for permission to film your house, they just did it.

Military installations and a few other places are excluded but chances are, your house is there.

Googles You Tube blacklist allows users to tag certain clips as inappropriate and Googles censors may or may not remove
them.
However, You Tube is notorious for removing politically and morally conservative videos on a regular basis while
never doing the same to liberal videos. They are also willing to work with foreign governments to determine which
videos will be allowed to be shown in the country.

The Google account blacklist can cut peoples access to their own email account as well as You Tube and other
Google products without any notice or recourse.

The Google News blacklist is insidious in every way. They are the biggest news aggregator on the planet, tracking
tens of thousands of news sources daily and converting them to numerous languages.

They have been accused on numerous occasions of excluding conservative news feeds as well as certain writers and
competing companies. This is an incredibly powerful and nearly unnoticeable tool to promote political, moral and/or religious
agenda.

Google Adwords blacklist is how Google gets the lions share of its money (some $56 billion annually) by selling keywords to
the highest bidders.
These keywords are how the website is found by searchers so if your site does not have them, you are going to sink.
On numerous occasions, Google has simply deleted those keywords on sites effectively making them invisible and
financially crushing them.

The search engine blacklist is a make or break situation for many web pages. Google, for many unknown reasons will push
web page down the list of rankings effectively ruining many businesses in a very short time.

The power to blacklist a site is Googles most dreaded weapon however. Google claims this power is to keep the internet
free from malicious malware which, they claim is a public service. The problems with this argument are many however.
Googles crawlers often make mistakes, blacklisting websites that do not contain malware.

Because of how extensively Google crawls the web, all the other main search engines use their blacklist which means that
once on the list, the site is effectively cut off from public access.

Google has used this power on numerous occasions on people they do not like.

Google even profits from this arrangement as they collect information from every user that accesses Googles results and then
sells it. Google has, for all intents and purposes, become the internet police man and they use this power to further their
globalist agenda on a regular basis and it is now supporting the same list of fake news sites that the British Independent and
Facebook are touting.

Google, Microsoft and Facebook have all three censored users on the behest of world governments and all three; have
consistently censored users for no apparent reason. They, along with Twitter (another social media monster) sided with
Obama to give away Americas right the control the internet.
Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire

Tragically, the US now finds every purveyor of media has been compromised and censored by those with globalist views.
Once ICANN loses its independence to the UN, the corporatist/governmental takeover will be complete.

Controlling access to information is every tyrants dream and our government is no different.

The main stream media did a masterful job of concealing the 2008 economic meltdown from the masses just like they have
the corruption of Hillary Clinton; the imploding Deutsche Bank; the growing threat of nuclear war with Russia; the threat of an
EMP from North Korea and now the escalating violence of the Clinton supporters after the election of Donald Trump.
It was only the access of the people to alternative news sites that alerted and continue to alert those willing to listen to truth
that news of these events get out at all.

Post-election America is now a powder keg awaiting a spark. The Green Party candidate for President, Jill Stein, started a
fund to recount the votes in three states in hopes of overturning the election of Donald Trump and now Democratic
candidate Hillary Clinton has joined her in what is only going to create a greater rift in our already shredded national tapestry.

Related: Michigan Recount Exposes Clinton Electoral Fraud: Half Of Detroit Votes Show Signs Of Tampering

This is only a part of the drama as now; the Washington Post has publically called the Drudge Report, Zero Hedge and former
Congressman Ron Paul agents of Russian Propaganda. As if on cue, the call has come from numerous governments on the
spread of hate speech in the US and the call to regulate it.

Which Mark Zukerberg is only too happy to oblige as he outlined a seven point plan to help stop the spread of fake news
on Facebook. So convincing is this fake news that it fools most students a new study finds which of course means that our
very Ministry of Truth will need to decipher it for us. In fact, the media is now calling on the FBI to investigate the fake news
without a shred of evidence to support them.

With a growing population of closed minded bigots unwilling to even listen to opposing opinions or facts, the US is slowly
returning to the Dark Ages with only a few sources controlling access to information.
Freedom loving people everywhere should all be asking themselves why this particular time was chosen for Obama to open
the door for the UN takeover of an already censored internet.

It is past time to look into a ham radio and other forms of communication that cannot be controlled by the elites. Here in the
Pacific Northwest we have an excellent source for information called the Radio Free Redoubt.

Time is of the essence as the days of the open internet are coming to a rapid close.

Hell is truth seen too late. Thomas Hobbes Leviathan

References:

1. Why the Media Lies So Much


2. Selling Empire: American Propaganda and War in the Philippines
3. 5 Times When The Mainstream Media Created Fake News And People Died As A Result
4. Waco, Texas: Where A Part Of Americas Heart And Soul Died.
5. The Great 9/11 Cover-up
6. ABC, NBC Ignore All Obamacare Failures in 2016, CBS Barely Covers
7. Six Corporations Control 90% of American Media
8. Hillarys Worst Crime Was Against the Filmmaker
9. The media and the financial crisis: Journalism failed
10. The Great ObamaCare Failure Our Corrupt Media Cant Talk About
11. Animated Map: The Battle of Arnhem
12. Just 6% of the People
13. Former CBS Reporter: I Was Called a Troublemaker for Pursuing Benghazi
14. Obama Admin Wants To Surrender US Control Over Internet To Global Bureaucracy
15. Statements in Support of the IANA Stewardship Transition
16. What Does ICANN Do?
17. Critics fear censorship as Obama hands control of internet to multi-national body
18. Heres Why We Should Go through the IANA Transition
19. US to Hand Over Internets Naming System, But Is ICANN Ready for Transition?
20. S. Surrender: Internet Giveaway to the U.N.?
21. Governing Cyberspace: ICANN, a Controversial Internet Standards Body
22. In Congressional Hearing, Stakeholders Highlight ICANNs Failures and Need for Reform
23. ICANN reports .sucks to the FTC over predatory pricing
24. ICANN Transition is Premature
25. ICANNs Amazon Problem
26. Amazon files appeal on rejected .amazon domain
27. Governments kill off Patagonias dot-brand bid
28. US hands internet control over to ICANN
29. Stop Obamas Internet Giveaway
30. Lie of the Year: If you like your health care plan, you can keep it
31. Obama: We Have to Change Wild West Media Landscape
32. Obama Says He Wants To Change The Free Flow Of Information
33. Merkel With Obama: Internet Disruptive Force that Has to Be Contained, Managed, and Steered by Government
34. Obama Merkel - Internet Censorship Will Control Middle Class Rebellion
35. Obama, Merkel Blame Social Media for Being Politically Disruptive
36. Microsoft is Still an Evil Company, Dont Believe the Reputation Laundering Campaigners
37. Liberal Media Bias
38. How Bing Search Engine Plays Politics in Election 2016
39. Tim Cook and Bill Gates Might Have Been on Hillary Clintons Vice President List
40. Gates Foundation accused of dangerously skewing aid priorities by promoting corporate globalization
41. Web censorship in China? Not a problem, says Bill Gates
42. Bill Gates: Voter opposition to globalization is a huge concern - and a wake-up call
43. Bill Gates says in order to keep talent in America the country must overhaul perverse immigration laws
44. Soros & Fellow Billionaires for Open Borders Lobby GOP on Amnesty
45. Microsoft Lays Off Thousands While Demanding More H1-B Visas
46. Xi Jinping in Seattle to meet with CEOs of Apple, Microsoft and other tech giants
47. New research claims that Microsofts Bing censors heavily within China, even more so than Baidu
48. Is Facebook Trying to Turn you Into a Globalist?
49. The end of Trump: How Facebook deepens millennials confirmation bias
50. Zuckerberg proves he is Facebooks editor by allowing Trumps hate speech.
51. Will Facebook Replace the News?
52. Facebook is a Media Company, Treat it as One
53. 61 million person experiment in social influence
54. Facebook Deliberately Experimented on Your Emotions
55. Facebook wants you to vote.
56. Did YOU change your Facebook picture to a rainbow?
57. Meet leftist prof who wrote hit list of fake news sites
58. HOW FAKE NEWS CREATED THE MYTH OF FIDEL CASTRO AS LATIN ROBIN HOOD
59. The New York Times; Unrepentant Communist Enabler
60. 1957: Matthews NY Times interview Castro in Sierra
61. Still Fronting for Fidel at the New York Times
62. Facebook Censorship
63. How Facebook Censors your posts
64. Facebook to crack down on spread of misinformation
65. The Top Ten Things We Cant Believe Eric Schmidt Ever Said
66. Of Course Facebook Is Biased. Thats How Tech Works Today
67. Wikileaks: Googles Eric Schmidt Planning Hillarys Campaign Since 2014
68. The Groundwork
69. Google defends its search engine against bias it favors Clinton
70. Eric Schmidt Dismisses Movie Driven Fear of AI
71. Google Search Statistics
72. Search Engine Ratings
73. Googles power of censorship: who controls the controllers of the internet?
74. Google controls what we buy, the news we read and Obamas policies
75. The new mind control
76. The NSAs Bulk Collection Is Over, but Google and Facebook Are Still in the Data Business
77. The New Censorship
78. NSA Prism program taps in to user data of Apple, Google and others
79. Youre a Criminal in a Mass Surveillance World How to Not Get Caught
80. Clinton to join recount that Trump calls scam
81. Washington Post: Drudge, Zero Hedge, & Ron Paul As Anti-Clinton Sophisticated Russian Propaganda Tools
82. Liberals are suddenly experts in Russian Espionage
83. Washington Post Peddles Tarring of Ron Paul Institute as Russian Propaganda
84. EUROPEANS CALL ON US LEADERS TO CURB HATE SPEECH
85. How Facebook plans to crack down on fake news
86. The Fake epidemic of fake news
87. Most Students Cant Tell the Difference Between Fake and Real News, Study Finds
88. Elite Media Plot New Censorship Regime
89. If you question the establishment, you are guilty of Espionage, says Corporate Media
90. Radio Free Redoubt

Additional Reading:

Cortana: The spy in Windows 10


Google Is Burying Negative Search Suggestions For Hillary Clinton, New Study Shows
Google to Bias Search Engine Based on Facts
Google will soon ban fake news sites from using its ad network
Google is Liberal and Biased
7,000 Sources or just a few favorites
Analyzing the Google bias
Why we should care about Facebook and Googles political bias
How Google Skewed Search Results
You Think Google Wight be Biased?
Ban on Fake News: What is Fake News?
ICANNs War on Whois Privacy
ICANN Can Be Fixed
ICANN faces first post-transmission test of U.N. power
Obama Admin Wants To Surrender US Control Over Internet To Global Bureaucracy
FCC Commissioner Hits Back at Internet Handover Proponents
Internet giveaway day? US govt relinquishes control of webs address book
S. to relinquish remaining control over the Internet
Please Stop Sharing These Sites:
Fake news sites, deceptive memes, and the rise of post truth politics
Liberal News, Conservative News and Fake News
False, Misleading, Clickbait-y, and/or Satirical News Sources
List of Fake News Websites
Two-thirds of the worlds internet users live under government censorship: report
Donuts Inc.s major play for new Web domain names raises eyebrows
Not Obamas to Give Away
Clintons Russian roulette
*BREAKING* Anti-Trump Globalist Zuckerberg Weaponizing Facebook to Influence 2016 Election
Facebook admits human role in news operation but denies left wing bias
Fake News threaten Democracy, Obama Says
Using fake news against opposing views

The Question That Fluoridation Promoters Cant Answer


December 17 2016 | From: FluorideAlert

During 2016, I asked this question to many fluoridation promoters and have yet to receive an
adequate scientific answer.
I asked it in several audiences in New Zealand and also to promoters at a council hearing in Naples, Florida and most
recently at a debate in Cortland, New York with Johnny Johnson and Steve Slott. Neither Johnson nor Slott,
otherwise very vocal on promoting fluoridation, had an answer.

Related: Why Does NZ Still Fluoridate? TV Commercial FFNZ

The Question to Promoters of Fluoridation:

What primary scientific studies (not bogus reviews conducted by pro-fluoridation agencies) can you cite
that gives you the confidence to ignore or dismiss the evidence that fluoride damages the brain as
documented in over 300 animal and human studies (including 50 IQ studies).

If proponents cannot provide an adequate scientific answer to this question: fluoridation should be halted
immediately.

On Nov 22, 2016, Michael Connett, JD, asked this question to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), on behalf of
FAN, Food & Water Watch, Organic Consumers Association, American Academy of Environmental Medicine, International
Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology, Moms Against Fluoridation, and several individual mothers, in a petition calling on
the EPA to ban the deliberate addition of fluoridating chemicals to the drinking water under provisions in the Toxic Substances
Control Act (TSCA).

The EPA has 90 days to reply, and if they fail to provide a satisfactory reply then they can be taken to Federal Court.

How you can take this further?

We are requesting that each one of you to ask this question of any promoter of fluoridation and keep asking it throughout
2017 until you can get an answer. Send that answer to us.

Based on responses we have seen so far we anticipate that there will be no satisfactory answers. In our view, there is no
scientific evidence that could justify ignoring the large number of scientific studies that fluoride damages the brain and thus no
justification for continuing this unethical and reckless practice of deliberately adding fluoridating chemicals to the drinking
water.
This in essence will be our 2017 campaign. Very simple, very direct and very important. We hope that you will support this in
two ways: a) ask this showstopper question in as many creative ways as you can and as many times as you can, and b)
support FAN financially.

Five More Ways to Take Action:

1. Send a letter-to-the-editor to your local newspapers

2. Sign on to FANs petition to the EPA.

3. Send the press release to your media outlets

4. Share this Facebook and this Twitter post.

5. Make a donation to support this campaign (see below).

Fundraising Update

Our new totals are $70,150 from 235 donors. We will be updatinng our running totals on a daily basis on our home
page: www.FluorideACTION.net

Related Articles:

Undeniable Evidence From Numerous Studies Proves That Fluoride Causes Cancer
New Zealand Government Plans To Drown Its Citizens In Toxic Fluorides

Auckland: No Consultation Needed For Stopping Or Starting Fluoridation + Decision Is An Attack On Democracy

Fluoride: Poison On Tap Official Trailer

The Fluoride Deception

New Zealand Fluoridation Review Unscientific And Intellectually Dishonest Say International Reviewers

Fluoride Free New Zealand: Dirty Science

Secret Fluoridation Review Totally One-Sided Admits Chair

Harvard Research Finds Link Between Fluoridated Water, ADHD & Mental Disorders

Climate Scare Declared Officially Over- Error In Model Calculations Discovered


December 16 2016 | From: RickWells

Acclaimed climate realist and former adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, Lord
Christopher Monckton, has some major news of a breakthrough discovery he has made in the area
of climate science. Comment: How long are the Cabal going to try to bury this latest hit?

Hes interviewed at the Global-Warming; an Inconvenient Lie conference in Phoenix, AZ by Millie Weaver, a
reporter for Infowars.

Related: Inconvenient Truths About the Man-made Global Warming Scam


Moncton is proud to be able to announce that he and his;

Team of very distinguished professors and doctors of science have discovered a major, significant,
substantial error in the way in which the computer models calculate how much warming they would
predict should be happening.

He says, Take that error away and there is no longer any climate problem. You might get one or two Celsius
of warming with a doubling of CO2 concentration but you wont get much more than that.

He says, All the suggestions that were facing some tipping point and suddenly we might see five or six, seven,
eight, ten, twelve, thirteen Celsius of warming for a doubling of CO2, the kind of dramatic figures that have been
appearing in some scientific papers, we can now prove that all of those very high end forecasts of how much
warming we might get are based on an error in mathematics.

Correct for the error and we are back down to a maximum of two, perhaps two and a half Celsius of warming for a
doubling of CO2.

Monckton says, I have been looking for this error in the mathematics for ten years. I have known it was
there but I didnt know what the error was, I just knew theyd made a mistake."

He then goes on to explain in some mathematical detail how he knew it, describing himself as a classical mathematician.

Related: With Ice Growing at Both Poles, Global Warming Theories Implode

He also has an announcement regarding a discovery by one of his esteemed colleagues, Professor William Happer of
Princeton, who discovered that the central estimate of global warming has been exaggerated by forty percent.

When his result is combined with the discovery by Monckton declares, officially, that the climate scare is over.
Infowars Reporter Millie Weaver interviews Lord Christopher Monckton who reveals a breaking
discovery which may prove the entire 'climate change' scare is based on faulty mathematics.

At the "Global-Warming; an Inconvenient Lie" conference in Phoenix, AZ Lord Monckton covers in depth the mathematical
discovery his team has made and announces that these findings have been submitted for proper peer review.

Related: Colleges Ban Free Speech Over Global Warming Skepticism

Michigan Recount Exposes Clinton Electoral Fraud: Half Of Detroit Votes Show Signs
Of Tampering
December 16 2016 | From: RussiaInsider

This is some next-level poetic justice: A Michigan recount backed by Jill Stein and the Democrats,
and intended to deligitimize Trump's astonishing victory on November 8, has actually
exposed widespread fraud in precincts which voted heavily for Clinton.

Hillary even sucks at cheating. Via the Detroit News:

Related: Pro-Monsanto think tank helped funnel Republican money into the Hillary Clinton campaign

Michigans largest county voted overwhelmingly for Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton, but officials
couldnt reconcile vote totals for 610 of 1,680 precincts during a countywide canvass of vote results late
last month.

Most of those are in heavily Democratic Detroit, where the number of ballots in precinct poll books did not match
those of voting machine printout reports in 59 percent of precincts, 392 of 662.
According to state law, precincts whose poll books dont match with ballots cant be recounted. If that happens,
original election results stand.

Its not good, conceded Daniel Baxter, elections director for the city of Detroit."

Understatement of the millenium?

Clinton's legendary "blue firewall"

Related: Wikileaks: Colbert Report Gave Clinton Foundation Control Over Production

Here's the best part: Officials blame the scanners used to tally votes for the huge discrepancies. Hard to believe:

Once they started the Michigan recount in earnest, and knowing he would be exposed, the Detroit City Clerk
Daniel Baxter all of a sudden started claiming that the optical scanners which read the paper ballots did not work
the day of the election.

Baxter blamed the discrepancies on decade-old voting machines. That is his cover story. Nothing like this was
mentioned until he realized their voting fraud scheme would be detected.

Baxters claim is that, when trying to push the ballots through the readers, the ballots would be stuck and theyd
have to push them through again thus ACCIDENTALLY resulting in a double count.

He says the poll workers sometimes FORGET to adjust the machine count and instead let the ballot count
twice."
Sounds reasonable.

It gets worse, though. Vigilant citizens who observed the recount said that there were numerous signs of vote tampering in
Hillary-heavy precincts.

Related: Alleged FBI Insider Says Bill Clinton Will Die, Everyone Is Exposed including Elite Pedophiles, Benghazi
Server, False Flag Events, All Part of the Final Drama

Ken Crider, a 2014 Republican candidate for District 19 of the Michigan House of Representatives, said he watched the
recount effort in Cobo Hall in Detroit with his wife, Penny. In a Facebook post Tuesday, he claimed to have witnessed some
serious ballot discrepancies. Crider wrote:

Penny Crider and I just got back from helping watch the recount at Cobo Hall in Detroit. On Nov. 8th (Election
Day) the election officials at 8:00 p.m. shut down the polls.

They then reconciled the differences from the machine count and the voter count on the computer. At this point, a
Metal tag/seal with a serial number is put on the box and the box was taken away.

Pennys precinct, Detroit Precinct #152 had an unbroken seal and everything looked proper. The tag on the box
said 306 and the book said 306 and the ticket said 306, so there should be 306 paper ballots on the box, right.

Well when they pulled out the ballots the stack seemed short and when they finished separating the two page
ballot to count the Presidential page only guess how many ballots were in the box?

304 no, 299 nope, 200 nada, how about 100 wrong again. There were only exactly 50 paper ballots in a locked
sealed box that again was supposed to have 306. Hmm.

Oh I forgot to add, since there was a discrepancy in the two numbers, the original count stands.
One more thing my precinct (sorry I forgot the number), had 525 votes on the book, tag and ticket and we
counted 525 ballots the election official was praising the Lord Hallelujah we have a countable precinct
Jill Stein had three (3) votes."

In other words: In Democratic Detroit, each vote was counted 6 times!

Just imagine the landslide popular vote victory Trump would have enjoyed if the Democrats played fair on Election Day.

Related Articles:

Report: Hillary Clinton Spent $1.2 Billion to Lose 2016 Election

A Clinton Fan Manufactured Fake News That MSNBC Personalities Spread to Discredit WikiLeaks Docs

Hillary Clinton Just Proved She Learned Nothing from Losing the Election

Report: Drunk Hillary Demanding Recount to Lift Her Spirits

The truth about Gaddafi's Libya, NATO's bombing, and the Benghazi 'consulate' attack

Money, Power and Oil. Exposing the Libyan Agenda: A Closer Look at Hillarys Emails

Report: Hillary Planning Yet Another Run For President in 2020

Former UK Ambassador Blasts "CIA's Blatant Lies", Shows "A Little Simple Logic
Destroys Their Claims" + Top Experts Dismiss Reported Claim That Russia Influenced
the US Election
December 15 2016 | From: BlacklistedNews / PaulCraigRoberts / InformationClearingHouse

I have watched incredulous as the CIAs blatant lie has grown and grown as a media story blatant
because the CIA has made no attempt whatsoever to substantiate it.
Former Ambassador Craig Murray

I have watched incredulous as the CIAs blatant lie has grown and grown as a media story blatant because the CIA
has made no attempt whatsoever to substantiate it.

Related: CIA: Washington Post Report Linking Russian Government to Trump & Election Hacking Is Outright Lie

A little simple logic demolishes the CIAs claims. The CIA claim they know the individuals involved. Yet under Obama
the USA has been absolutely ruthless in its persecution of whistleblowers, and its pursuit of foreign hackers through
extradition.

We are supposed to believe that in the most vital instance imaginable, an attempt by a foreign power to destabilise a
US election, even though the CIA knows who the individuals are, nobody is going to be arrested or extradited, or (if in
Russia) made subject to yet more banking and other restrictions against Russian individuals?

Plainly it stinks. The anonymous source claims of We know who it was, it was the Russians are beneath contempt.

As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless
times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks there is a major difference between the two.

Related: The Conspiracy to Shut Down Truth, Donald Trump, and The American People

And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to
disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not
accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not
failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.

The continued ability of the mainstream media to claim the leaks lost Clinton the election because of Russia, while
still never acknowledging the truths the leaks reveal, is Kafkaesque.

I had a call from a Guardian journalist this afternoon. The astonishing result was that for three hours, an article was
accessible through the Guardian front page which actually included the truth among the CIA hype:

The Kremlin has rejected the hacking accusations, while the WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has previously
said the DNC leaks were not linked to Russia.
A second senior official cited by the Washington Post conceded that intelligence agencies did not have specific
proof that the Kremlin was directing the hackers, who were said to be one step removed from the Russian
government.

Craig Murray, the former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan, who is a close associate of Assange, called the CIA
claims bullshit, adding: They are absolutely making it up.

I know who leaked them, Murray said. Ive met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian
and its an insider. Its a leak, not a hack; the two are different things.

If what the CIA are saying is true, and the CIAs statement refers to people who are known to be linked to the
Russian state, they would have arrested someone if it was someone inside the United States.

America has not been shy about arresting whistleblowers and its not been shy about extraditing hackers. They
plainly have no knowledge whatsoever."

But only three hours. While the article was not taken down, the home page links to it vanished and it was replaced by a
ludicrous one repeating the mad CIA allegations against Russia and now claiming incredibly that the CIA believe
the FBI is deliberately blocking the information on Russian collusion.

Presumably this totally nutty theory, that Putin is somehow now controlling the FBI, is meant to answer my obvious objection
that, if the CIA know who it is, why havent they arrested somebody. That bit of course would be the job of the FBI, who those
desperate to annul the election now wish us to believe are the KGB.

It is terrible that the prime conduit for this paranoid nonsense is a once great newspaper, the Washington Post, which
far from investigating executive power, now is a sounding board for totally evidence free anonymous source briefing of utter
bullshit from the executive.

Related: Trumps Stock Market Rally Continues at Record Pace This Has Never Occurred in 110 Years!

In the UK, one single article sums up the total abnegation of all journalistic standards. The truly execrable Jonathan
Freedland of the Guardian writes Few credible sources doubt that Russia was behind the hacking of internal Democratic
party emails, whose release by Julian Assange was timed to cause maximum pain to Hillary Clinton and pleasure for Trump.

Does he produce any evidence at all for this assertion?

No, none whatsoever. What does a journalist mean by a credible source?


Well, any journalist worth their salt in considering the credibility of a source will first consider access. Do they credibly
have access to the information they claim to have?

Now both Julian Assange and I have stated definitively the leak does not come from Russia. Do we credibly have access?
Yes, very obviously. Very, very few people can be said to definitely have access to the source of the leak. The people saying it
is not Russia are those who do have access. After access, you consider truthfulness.

Do Julian Assange and I have a reputation for truthfulness? Well in 10 years not one of the tens of thousands of documents
WikiLeaks has released has had its authenticity successfully challenged. As for me, I have a reputation for inconvenient truth
telling.

Contrast this to the credible sources Freedland relies on. What access do they have to the whistleblower? Zero. They have
not the faintest idea who the whistleblower is. Otherwise they would have arrested them. What reputation do they have
for truthfulness? Its the Clinton gang and the US government, for goodness sake.

Related: The Wisconsin Vote Recount Raised Trumps Vote Count (And the Michigan vote recount found that in
Detroit some Hillary votes were multiplied by 6.)

In fact, the sources any serious journalist would view as credible give the opposite answer to the one Freedland
wants.

But in what passes for Freedlands mind, credible is 100% synonymous with establishment. When he says credible
sources he means establishment sources. That is the truth of the fake news meme. You are not to read anything unless it
is officially approved by the elite and their disgusting, crawling whores of stenographers like Freedland.

The worst thing about all this is that it is aimed at promoting further conflict with Russia. This puts everyone in danger for the
sake of more profits for the arms and security industries including of course bigger budgets for the CIA. As thankfully the
four year agony of Aleppo comes swiftly to a close today, the Saudi and US armed and trained ISIS forces counter by moving
to retake Palmyra.

This game kills people, on a massive scale, and goes on and on.

Related: FBI Disputes CIAs Fuzzy And Ambiguous Claims That Russia Sought To Influence Presidential Election

Top Experts Dismiss Reported Claim That Russia Influenced the US Election

Presstitutes such as the New York Times and Reuters continue to hype an alleged CIA finding that
Russians hacked Hillarys emails and used them to influence the election outcome.

As a number of experts have noted, there is no evidence whatsoever for the claim, which is in the category of fake
news.

Related: Anonymous Leaks to the WashPost About the CIAs Russia Beliefs Are No Substitute for Evidence

Julian Assange at Wikileaks, which released the leaked, not hacked, documents, denies that the Russians were involved.

William Binney, former top NSA official says that if Russia did it, NSA would have clear evidence. Binney said that:

They have failed to prove anything, which suggests they dont have proof and just want to war-monger
the public into a second cold war with the Russians.

After all, theres lots and lots of money in that for the military-industrial-intelligence-governmental
complex of incestuous relationships.

How To Instantly Tell If Russia Hacked the Election

December 11, 2016 "Information Clearing House" - "Moon Of Alabama" - Anonymous CIA officials claim that Russia hacked
the U.S. election by accessing emails from top Democratic officials and then leaking them to Wikileaks.

But the Washington Post notes:

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) voiced doubts about the veracity of the intelligence, according
to officials present.
***

A senior U.S. official said there were minor disagreements among intelligence officials about the agencys
assessment, in part because some questions remain unanswered.

For example, intelligence agencies do not have specific intelligence showing officials in the Kremlin directing the
identified individuals to pass the Democratic emails to WikiLeaks .

***

Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, has said in a television interview that the Russian government is not
the source. [The former intelligence analyst, British Ambassador to Uzbekistan, and chancellor of the University of
Dundee (Craig Murray) who is close friends with Wikileaks Assange said he knows with 100% certainty that
the Russians arent behind the leaks.]

***

Ill be the first one to come out and point at Russia if theres clear evidence, but there is no clear evidence
even now, said Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee and a
member of the Trump transition team. Theres a lot of innuendo, lots of circumstantial evidence, thats it.

Indeed, some cybersecurity consultants claim that its impossible to ever know for sure who is behind hacks of this nature.

But thats wrong

In reality, it would be childs play to determine whether or not the Russians really hacked the Dem emails and shared
them with Wikileaks.

Related: Is The Deep State At War... With Itself?

Specifically, Edward Snowden says the NSA could easily determine who hacked the Democratic National Committees emails:
Evidence that could publicly attribute responsibility for the DNC hack certainly exists at #NSA, but DNI traditionally
objects to sharing."

- Edward Snowden (@Snowden) July 25, 2016

But dont trust Snowden

The NSA executive who created the agencys mass surveillance program for digital information, who served as
the senior technical director within the agency, who managed six thousand NSA employees, the 36-year NSA veteran widely
regarded as a legend within the agency and the NSAs best-ever analyst and code-breaker, who mapped out the Soviet
command-and-control structure before anyone else knew how, and so predicted Soviet invasions before they happened (in
the 1970s, he decrypted the Soviet Unions command system, which provided the US and its allies with real-time surveillance
of all Soviet troop movements and Russian atomic weapons) confirmed to Washingtons Blog that the NSA
would definitely know who the hacker was.

Binney told Washingtons Blog in July:

Snowden is right and the MSM is clueless.

***

Do they have evidence that the Russians downloaded and later forwarded those emails to wikileaks? Seems to me
that they need to answer those questions to be sure that their assertion is correct.

***

You can tell from the network log who is going into a site. I used that on networks that I had. I looked to see who
came into my LAN, where they went, how long they stayed and what they did while in my network.

Further, if you needed to, you could trace back approaches through other servers etc. Trace Route and Trace
Watch are good examples of monitoring software that help do these things. Others of course exist probably the
best are in NSA/GCHQ and the other Five Eyes countries. But, these countries have no monopoly on smart
people that could do similar detection software."

In October, Binney told us:

If the idiots in the intelligence community expect us to believe them after all the crap they have told us (like WMDs
in Iraq and no we dont collect data on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans) then they need to give
clear proof of what they say. So far, they have failed to prove anything.

Which suggests they dont have proof and just want to war monger the US public into a second cold war
with the Russians.

After all, theres lots and lots of money in that for the military-industrial-intelligence-governmental complex of
incestuous relationships.

***

If you recall, a few years ago they pointed to a specific building in China that was where hacks on the US were
originating. So, lets see the same from the Russians. They dont have it. Thats why they dont show it. They want
to swindle us again and again and again. You can not trust these intelligence agencies period."
Related: Rogue Elements of the CIA Are Operating Against President-elect Trump

That same month, Binney told Newsweek:

U.S. officials know how many people [beyond the Russians] could have done this but they arent telling us
anything. All theyre doing is promoting another cold war.

Binney compared allegations about Russian hacks to previous U.S. fabrications of intelligence to justify the
invasion of Iraq in 2003 and the bombing of North Vietnam in 1964.

This is a big mistake, another WMD or Tonkin Gulf affair thats being created until they have absolute proof of
Russian complicity in the DNC hacks, he charged during a Newsweek interview. He noted that after the Kremlin
denied complicity in the downing of a Korean Airlines flight in 1983, the U.S. exposed the conversations where
[Russian pilots] were ordered to shoot it down. Obama officials have the evidence now of who hacked the DNC,
he charged. So lets see it, guys.

Last month, Binney explained:

If it were the Russians, NSA would have a trace route to them and not equivocate on who did it. Its like
using Trace Route to map the path of all the packets on the network. In the program Treasuremap NSA has
hundreds of trace route programs embedded in switches in Europe and hundreds more around the world. So, this
set-up should have detected where the packets went and when they went there.
In other words, theres no need to speculate on whether the Russians were the hackers. The NSA could easily determine
who was behind the hacks.

Of course, in an era where challenging officials to provide evidence may get one labeled as a Russian propagandist, the
question is how many people will stand up for the all-American value of questioning the proclamations of those in power:

Tucker Carlson DESTROYS Congressman Adam Schiff On Russian Interference In U.S Election

Related: Anti-Trump False Flag: Rogue CIA, Globalist Left Attempt to Overthrow Trump

Fake News Hysteria Hinges On The Laughable Assumption That Corporate-Run Media Has A
Divine Monopoly On Facts + US Lawmakers Move To Criminalize Fake News, Propaganda On The
Web
December 14 2016 | From: NaturalNews / Sputnik/ Various

The insidious assumption behind the fake news accusations being flung far and wide by the
fakestream media (CNN, NPR, WashPost, NYT, MSNBC, etc.) is that somehow the corporate media
has a divine monopoly on facts.

The Cabal Establishment is in Panic Mode as Alternative Media Blasts the Controlled-Mainstream
Media Out of the Water - the Corporate Media Lies are Being Exposed Virally, Worldwide.

The assumption is ludicrously demonstrated when MSNBC rolls out convicted liar Brian Williams to decry fake
news.

Related: Fake News: Who is Really Making the War on Truth?

Youd be hard pressed to find any fake news propagandist who churned out more fake news than Brian Williams and hes
still working at MSNBC!

Back in early 2015, Breitbart News presented a list of at least 32 times that NBC News let Williams present such fake news to
the American people - lies and disputed stories - including his false claims about being in a helicopter that was hit by an
RPG, reports Breitbart.com, one of the new media giants accused of publishing fake news by the collapsing lamestream
media.

As long as the government engages in intelligence activities that violate our rights secured by our Constitution,
any Intel Authorization bill should be opposed, Justin Amash told Sputnik News.

Williams also made up stories about Seal Team 6, the fall of the Berlin Wall, the Pope, Hurricane Katrina, quitting
college, rescuing a puppy from a house fire, and more, Breitbart continues.

If the Media Establishment Only Tells the Truth, Why are so Many of Their News Reports Obviously
Faked?

If the corporate-run media really had some sort of divine monopoly on facts, then none of us would be able to find examples
of laughably fake news on their websites, would we? Yet even the Washington Post has now been exposed for, if you can
believe it, faking a news story about fake news!

Any honest investigation can go right down the list: CNN, NYT, WashPost, HuffPost, LA Times, USA Today, NPR, MSNBC,
Fox News and so on every one of these news organizations has run genuinely fake news while claiming it was
fact.

Its not even difficult to find examples of these organizations deliberately fabricating fake news in order to alter the outcome of
the recent election.
Nearly all of them reported, for example, some variation of the absurd claim that Donald Trump cant win the
election.

These are also the same fake news organizations that obediently and enthusiastically repeated Obamas fabricated claims
about Obamacare. Remember If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor?

Or how about the claim that Obamacare will save American families $2500 a year, on average? Not only were these glaring
examples of fake news, they were known to be false at the time they were published by the corporate-run media.

Another way the Media Fakes the News: Censorship of Important Stories they Dont Want you to
Learn

And then there are the stories the entire fakestream media censors because they dont want anyone to learn about actual
facts. As a particularly egregious example, it is an established fact that CDC scientist Dr. William Thompson publicly admitted
to falsifying scientific data at the CDC to obscure the statistical link between vaccines and autism in African-Americans. That is
not only indisputable, its also an incredibly important piece of news for the health of all Americans.

Did the fakestream media cover that story? Not by a long shot: They censored it.

Every single fakestream media organization across the country obediently blackballed the story. The censorship was
obviously coordinated, deliberate and malicious. Remember, censorship of important facts is another way the insidious
corporate-run media lies to its misinformed viewers.

Hilarious Videos of CNN Staging Fake Locations, Fake Missile Attacks and Fake Seafaring

CNN has forever used fakery, theatrics and false reporting to influence public opinion rather than report the news. Perhaps the
most hilarious example of dishonest CNN fakery is the Charles Jaco video from the first Gulf War.

In order to pretend to be covering the Gulf War from a live set in Saudi Arabia, CNN built a Saudi stage in the USA and
faked a SCUD missile attack on its news anchor Charles Jaco.

Hilarious, as the video shows below, while Charles Jaco grabs a gas mask, his co-anchor grabs a helmet (see the 7:00 mark
in the video below). Its funnier than a really bad SNL skit!
Remember, this was all broadcast as CNN Live, where CNN literally pretended this was all real and true.

Faking the news is a specialty of CNN, and there are countless examples of the network going out of its way to stage fake
sets, fake locations and even use actors following mass shootings to make sure the proper narrative is delivered to the
public.

For example, this video interview reveals a comprehensive collection of CNN news fakery such as the bizarre
moment when CNN anchors try to pretend they are not in the same parking lot.

That incident, detailed in this UK Daily Mail article, involved a CNN anchor and guest desperately trying to pretend they were
broadcasting live from distant locations when, in reality, they were in the exact same parking lot. (This is evidenced by the
simple fact that the exact same vehicles pass behind them, in the exact same sequence)

CNN frequently uses green screens to fake locations.

The hilarious video below shows CNN building an entire fake ship on a green screen set to try to create the illusion that their
reporter is on the scene in the Black Sea, covering US war ships near Ukraine.

During the hilariously bad fake set report, the CNN journalist even points off in the distance behind him to try to
make the green screen illusion more convincing:

Youll discover another jaw-dropping compilation of fake, scripted news from the mainstream media in this next
video, covering media fakery involving the Gulf War, the defamation of Ron Paul, 9/11 attacks, Bin Laden and more:

The entire Sandy Hook mass shooting narrative was deeply layered in all sorts of CNN fakery, including the use of actors
who were told to read lines to the cameras while sobbing uncontrollably for maximum effect.

Related: Censorship Shock: Amazon.com Bans Investigative Book Nobody Died At Sandy Hook Because It
Disagrees With Government Version Of What Happened

In one case, a cheerful white man is laughing it up in the background, then when signaled to approach the
microphone to speak on camera, starts hyperventilating and crying while reading his obviously scripted lines. (The
guy turns out to be a professional actor.)

In the same video, shown below, another actor is caught on a hot mic asking, Do you want me to read the card? right before
sobbing on camera, playing the part of a grieving parent.

Yet another Sandy Hook theatrical fake news hoax was the use of David Wheeler, a professional actor, as both a
grieving parent and a SWAT team sniper.

As with all the other actors rolled out for CNNs cameras, this professional actor performed a scripted role in order to evoke
a powerful emotional response with the sole purpose of repealing the Second Amendment (a necessary step before
America can be overrun and controlled by radical leftist communists).

The way he carries his sniper rifle (upside down, by the magazine) makes it laughably obvious to anyone familiar
with firearms that he has absolutely no clue how to carry a rifle

The Corporate-Run Media has Done Nothing but Fake the News for Decades

Search YouTube for terms like CNN green screen or crisis actors or Sandy Hook or faked news and you can spend
hour and after watching clear examples of outlandish news fakery by the mainstream media. It doesnt take long for any
intelligent, clear thinking individual to realize the mainstream media has been faking the news for decades.

CNN, in fact, can be best described as a fake news theater organization pretending to be engaged in legitimate journalism.

I even recorded a podcast on this very subject, discussing all the news fakery weve all been subjected to over the years by
the deliberate fabrications of the corporate-controlled media.

Come to think of it, you probably need to go back and revisit what you think is really true about many historic events covered
by the lying media: Oklahoma City, 9/11, Sandy Hook, the assassination of JFK and even the nuking of Japan in World War
II.

In every case, what was reported by the lying mainstream media was a scripted narrative, not a serious investigation into
what really happened.

Related Articles:
Whos Behind PropOrNots Blacklist of News Websites

Whos the Biggest Peddler of Fake News?

Denzel Washington Slams Mainstream Media For Peddling BS

Reddit Shadow Bans Infowars As Fake News War Accelerates

How the mainstream medias fake news undermines democracy and protects the corrupt establishment

Facebook, Google, Twitter, YouTube: A Spirit of Cooperation

Trump Labels CNN Fake News

US Lawmakers Move To Criminalize Fake News, Propaganda On The Web

The witch hunt for fake news and Russian propaganda has been kicked up a notch, after the
House passed a bill quietly tucked inside the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017,
designed to crack down on free speech and independent media.
Under "Title V - Matters relating to foreign countries, the bill seeks to "counter active measures by Russia to exert
covert influence carried out in coordination with, or at the behest of, political leaders or the security services of
the Russian Federation and the role of the Russian Federation has been hidden or not acknowledged publicly.

It lists media manipulation as:

Establishment or funding of a front group

Covert broadcasting

Media manipulation

Disinformation and forgeries

Funding agents of influence

Incitement and offensive counterintelligence

Assassinations

Terrorist acts

It is easy to see how this law, if passed by the Senate and signed by the president, could be used to
target, threaten, or eliminate so-called fake news websites, a list which has been used to arbitrarily define
any website, or blog, that does not share the mainstream medias proclivity to serve as the Public
Relations arm of a given administration, - Global Research reported.

The frightening attack on speech and independent media was opposed by only 30 members of the House, including Tulsi
Gabbard, Thomas Massie, and Justin Amash - who stated that he fought against it.
As long as the government engages in intelligence activities that violate our rights secured by our
Constitution, any Intel Authorization bill should be opposed, Justin Amash told Sputnik News.

The bill must now pass through Senate, though a senior Rand Paul aide has told Sputnik News that the Senator is currently
holding the intelligence bill for several reasons - and that they are looking at this specific issue very closely.

Curiously, the bill which was passed on November 30, was introduced on November 22, two days before the Washington
Post published its Nov. 24 article citing experts who claim Russian propaganda helped Donald Trump get elected, Zero
Hedge noted.

The experts the newspaper cited was a group called PropOrNot, although it have refused to name the experts behind the
operation. The organization has promoted a Ukrainian hacker group on their Twitter feed.
PropOrNot also listed over 200 websites that they accuse of peddling Russian propaganda, including extremely popular news
websites on all sides of the political spectrum, including The Drudge Report, Zero Hedge, TruthOut, Sputnik News, and even
WikiLeaks.
Former presidential candidate Ron Pauls website is also mentioned in many of the articles on so-called fake news, an issue
that should be concerning to those who believe in free speech, including his son, Senator Rand Paul.

The elder Paul has long been a vocal supporter of freedom of speech, as it is enshrined in the Constitution of the United
States, and he and his supporters have repeatedly been the target of finger pointing and demonization.

In 2012, a risk-assessment report from a Missouri-based fusion center stated that support for Ron Paul's presidential bid was
a sign of membership in a domestic terrorist group."

Related: Washington Posts Piece on Fake News Promotes Fake List of Unreliable Sources

For purposes of this definition it does not matter whether the sites listed here are being knowingly directed and paid by
Russian intelligence officers, or whether they even knew they were echoing Russian propaganda at any particular point: If
they meet these criteria, they are at the very least acting as bona-fide useful idiots of the Russian intelligence services, and
are worthy of further scrutiny, the so-called experts cited by PropOrNot state.
Many of those listed on censorship hit lists are speaking out against the attempt to stop independent media.

Information is dangerous and with this new reactionary shift of people making ban lists of so called fake
news, it shows us how afraid they are of knowledge and differences of opinion that spur people to have
an open mind, Luke Rudkowski, the owner of We Are Change, one of the sites on the blacklist, previously
told Sputnik News.

Information is very dangerous for the establishment status quo that tried to keep things the way they
are.

The bill, Zero Hedge notes, will soon proclaim much of the internet to be criminal Russian propaganda if it is allowed to pass.

Related Articles:
Congress Admits CIA Moving To Ban Free Speech In America

If You Are For Peace You Are A Russian Agent

Fake News Viewed as Move to Ban Dissenting Voices

MSM Takes Fake News To The Next Level

Why Labeling Websites As Russian Propaganda is Dangerous

Pike River: The Great Disgrace


December 13 2016 | From: Uncensored / Archvival

The recent open letter from the directors of solid energy regarding pike river - the greatest disgrace
& corrupt act of treason in new zealands history.

Solid Energy's penned an open letter defending its plan to permanently seal the Pike River mine reiterating it won't
change its stance. The company's directors maintain it's not safe to re-enter the mine, and say anyone who disagrees
is being reckless.

Related: 'The town bully just went down' - Pike River families say control of mine's access road given to them

But families of the 29 men who died in the in the 2010 explosions are protesting near the site and say Solid Energy is ignoring
expert research that shows the mine can safely be re-entered. The mine is expected to be permanently sealed by February.

According to Dr Jacob Cohens mind-blowing book Murder at Pike River Mine (on the Internet, (the NZ intelligence agencies
have been trying to censor censoring it) or it is available through Mr Lawrie Drew at Greymouth (a father of one of the victims):

1. The 29 miners at Pike River Mine explosion in 2010 were all deliberately murdered, to facilitate Pike River Coal
Ltd to collect a $100 million insurance pay-out, turn the publics attitude away from underground coal mining and
reduce opposition to open-cut mining.

This would allow BATHURST RESOURCES LIMITED (at the time registered on the Australian Stock Exchange but now dually
listed) which foreign bankers also secretly control with Pike River Coal, to overtly come into New Zealand and buy up all of the
countrys coal resources and then open cut mine it which has by now almost been fully completed!

2. Interestingly, Dr Cohen mentions in great detail with references from Bathursts own website, that just before the explosion
in the mine, BANK OF AMERICA was aggressively buying up shares in Bathurst Resources Limited. Guess who was working
for Bank of America before he became NZ Prime Minister.
3. COLLUSION BETWEEN THE DIRECTORS OF PIKE RIVER COAL LTD, THE DIRECTORS OF THE BIG
SHAREHOLDERS OF PIKE RIVER COAL, THE NEW ZEALAND GOVERNMENT, THE NZ PM, THE NZ MINISTER OF
POLICE, THE NZ JUDICIARY, THE NZ INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES, THE ROYAL COMMISSION INTO THE PIKE RIVER
COAL MINE DISASTER, THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA AND THE FOREIGN BANKING CRIMINALS THAT CONTROL THE
LOT AT THE TOP has ensured the New Zealand public have been totally brainwashed about the true facts of this
monstrous crime and cover-up.

4. And just to make sure the mine victims families, or the general public cant ever know the full truth about the crime, or
even get into the mine to inspect the crime scene, and cant sue the Government, the companies or Pikes criminal directors,
the spurious rat and High Court Judge heading the corrupt, Royal Commission of Inquiry.

Oh, the quandry for the corporate 'it', such that is has intentionally failed

According to Lawrie Drew, HAS EMBARGOED ALL THE CRITICAL EVIDENCE FOR 75 YEARS! And yes, this has all been
totally censored by the incredibly vile, corrupt mainstream media!

5. This means, in simple mans terms, that the corrupt lawyers and judiciary involved all now know, that when for example
the Government Department supposedly that wanted to bring CEO of Pike River Coal Peter Whittall to trial under Health and
Safety laws (actually it was just a pretence because they all knew that it would fail) all that Peter Whittalls legal counsel had to
say to the judge in the pre-trial hearing was:

Your Honour, as all the critical evidence has been been embargoed by the Royal Commission for 75 years, we
cannot get disclosure and my client cannot defend himself against the allegations because all the evidence is
being kept secret and cannot be accessed.

Judge: Case dismissed.

6. This therefore means that the NZ Government, police, the judiciary etc. at least at the top - ALL KNOW they are a pack of
lying criminals, including the drafters of this latest Open Letter FROM THE DIRECTORS OF SOLID ENERGY.

7. All I can say is, because of the widespread indifference of the the general public in putting up with this outrageous evil, we
all deserve the judgment coming on us all. Because inevitably it will come. If they will get away with this, what will be next?

8. Apparently, PM John Key was personally given a copy of Dr Jacob Cohens mind-blowing book so he cant say he was
not informed. Isnt it rather strange to see he is abruptly resigning around the same time they want to seal up the mine.

9. Finally these devils want to seal up the entrance to the mine with a 30 metre thick plug of concrete. 30 metres! Can you
believe it? They sure do want to make sure nobody ever investigates the crime scene dont they?

In the United States of America a similar coal mine explosion occurred at the Upper Big Branch Mine not long before Pike
River explosion when exactly 29 miners were also killed. Since then, the miners families have received millions of dollars in
pay-outs and the CEO of the company concerned Don Blankenchip is now in jail.

Yet here in New Zealand, not even one director has even been charged or brought to trial. We hear about the criminal
activities of government agencies in the United States being bad, but our government and corporate criminal cabal is a
hundred times worse! 29 miners cruelly killed, and yet nobody has even received a slap on the hand. What an utter disgrace.

Frankly, if we just sit back and put if with this rot and say nothing about the blatant lies being perpetuated by the mainstream
corporate media propaganda goons, nearly five million of us, seriously, I fear for the freedoms and liberties of every single
person in this country.

Isnt it about time things changed dramatically?

Truly.

Pike River Murder Of 29 Miners & Blocking Of Re-Entry


September 25 2014 | From: Dr Jacob Cohen & 'Jack' (see download link below)

A censored book claims corruption at the very highest level of Government, Poice, International
Bankers, Corporations and Media Propoganda - naming those who should be charged.
"Ive been watching the reports on TV and mainstream media over last couple of days, and hadnt realised that your
victims families had sought, successfully, under the Official Information Act the experts reports that say the drift 2.3
km access tunnel is now perfectly safe for re-entry, yet Solid Energy have been lying about this fact, and it is plain
what their delayed decision in October will be negative!"

"Clearly, there is something in the access tunnel that they know they dont want to be revealed to either you or the public.

It all points to the fact the serious allegations in Dr Jacob Cohens book, MURDER AT PIKE RIVER MINE are 100% correct,
and that all the miners were plainly murdered.

Further, in even greater support of Dr Cohens penetrating allegations now, is the undeniable fact that government intelligence
agencies (it couldnt be anyone else) have REMOVED and CENSORED the book almost entirely from the Internet. The only
copy I could find this morning was on this site below.

You can have a look at the few remaining references to it if you GOOGLE-search it and you will find the books references are
still there, but the book has been DELETED.

Perhaps, you and the families, could have copies of the book printed up and personally delivered to all MPs.

While this would not guarantee mine re-entry and police examination of some of the crime scene, at least it will mean that the
entire government, (representing the entire nation) has been properly informed of the real truth and the blatant cover-up,
headed by big business in collusion with the NZ Prime Minister John Key, brought out so vividly by Dr Cohen. "

Download a PDF copy of Dr Cohen's book here.

The Fight to Save Us From Satan's Subliminal Rock Messages


December 12 2016 | From: AtlasObscura

In the 1980s, many politicians were convinced there were devious, secret messages hidden inside
popular records.
On April 27, 1982, members of the California Assemblys Consumer Protection and Toxics Committee gathered in
Sacramento to hear Robert Plant endorse Satan. This was not a straightforward testimonial.

Note: The following story essentially attempts to de-bunk the idea that the music industry is not satanic, and that
negative influences are utilsed. Whether the author is aware or not, both points are wrong, as the links included
and insider experience will attest. While it is an interesting enough read, the links take it apart on the way through...

Related: Demons Behind The Music Industry (Ex Illuminati Explains) & Illuminati - The Music Industry Exposed

For one thing, the Led Zeppelin frontman wasnt actually in attendance. Also, his pro-devil paeans could only be heard when
you played Stairway to Heaven backwards.

After circulating pamphlets with the backward masked declarations spelled out, thats precisely what Assemblyman Phillip
Wyman and panel witness William H. Yarroll II did. The relevant portion of the eight-minute classic was first played forward
for committee members and then reversed.

Heres what Wyman claimed could be heard:

I sing because I live with Satan. The Lord turns me off. Theres no escaping it. Heres to my sweet Satan.

Yarroll, who identified himself as a neuroscientist, noted that a teenager need only listen to Stairway to Heaven three
times before these backward messages were stored as truth.

It wasnt just Plant reverse-singing Satans praises, either. According to Yarroll, bands ranging from Styx to the Beatles also
had secret backmasked messages hidden in their music - messages that, in the words of legislative proposal A.B. 3741, had
the power to manipulate our behavior without our knowledge or consent and turn us into disciples of the Antichrist.
As the bills sponsor, Wyman wanted mandatory warning labels on all rock albums containing these morally dubious
backward messages.

Suppose young people have heard Stairway to Heaven two or three hundred times and there has been
implanted in their subconscious mind pro satanic messages or incantations? he told Terry Drinkwater the
following day on a CBS Evening News segment.

Indeed, this was the truly insidious part of backmasking. Even though you had to play records in reverse to decipher the
occultic messages, they could still subliminally imprint themselves upon young teen minds when played in the standard
direction.

During the same news segment, Yarroll described how the brain unscrambles a backward masked message:

We have it stored in the unconscious as a truth image, he said, and as the creative unconscious side of the brain
does, it goes through scanning the unconscious brain to go about and bring those truth images to the surface and
make them reality for us.

After calling the issue exciting and interesting, committee chairman Sally Tanner (D-El Monte) delayed an official vote until
the music industry and band members could weigh in on the matter. That day never came. But the national panic
surrounding subliminal satanic messages in rock music was about to reach fever pitch.

In the early 70s, backmasking - or the practice of recording vocals and instruments backwards and then reinserting them
into the forward mix of a song - was something a music savvy (and possibly stoned) Beatles fan might bring up.
A decade later, it had become a cause clbre for conservative religious leaders, school teachers, parents, and even
politicians.

Whether it was the reversed voice of Freddie Mercury declaring its fun to smoke marijuana on Another One Bites the
Dust or Styx imploring Satan to move through our voices on Snowblind, there seemed to be mounting evidence that rock
music was literally becoming a mouthpiece for the devil.

Related: Monarch Mind Control & The MK-Ultra Program

Believers held record-smashing parties, appeared on popular TV talk shows, wrote books, formed watchdog groups, and,
perhaps most importantly, called their government representatives to warn them.

By 1982, state and federal legislation was being introduced at a steady clip to combat rock and rolls hidden satanic agenda.
Two weeks after the California Assembly hearing in Sacramento, California congressman Robert Dornan introduced H.R.
6363 to the House. Also known as the Phonograph Record Backward Masking Labeling Act, the bill aimed to do the same
thing as Wymans A.B. 3741, only on a national level.
While it would ultimately be shuffled off to the Subcommittee on Commerce, Transportation and Tourism to die, other bills -
including one in Arkansas a year later - were passed unanimously by both house and senate members (then-Governor Bill
Clinton ultimately vetoed that one).

For its own part, the music industry responded with a bemused skepticism. Styxs James Young called the whole
idea of satanic backmasking a hoax perpetrated by religious zealots, and refused to attend any meeting or hearing
where the topic was discussed.

Then there was Bob Garcia of A&M Records, who declared;

It must be the devil putting these messages on the records because no one here knows how to do it.
Related: How Mnemonic Is Used To Program And Control Your Mind

A spokesman for Led Zeppelins record label, Swan Song Records, issued just one statement in response to the Stairway
to Heaven satanic allegations:

Our turntables only rotate in one direction.

Taken as a whole, these reactions only stoked the righteous (and possibly entrepreneurial) fires of religious leaders like
pastor Gary Greenwald, who started holding backmasking seminars all over the country.

Soon, books like Backward Masking Unmasked, Dancing With Demons, and The Devils Disciples: The Truth About Rock,
were exposing the sinister nature of rock and roll music, while watchdog organizations like Parents Against Subliminal
Seduction (P.A.S.S.) tried to block rock concerts at various venues.

The problem, as you may have already guessed, was that the whole thing was a bunch of diabolical tihsllub.

Lets pause here to do something most satanic backmasking proponents never did during the controversy: distinguish
between real engineered backmasking and the majority of messages people thought they were hearing during the 70s and
80s. The former is a technique that dates back to the advent of recorded music.

The latter is the result of what psychologists call pareidolia (more on that in a bit), and is simply the brains attempt to make
sense of the gibberish that results from phonetic reversals.

Related: 10 Ways To Protect Yourself From NLP Mind Control

Recording things backwards really began when the field of sound recording began, says Alex Case, president of the Audio
Engineering Society. After Thomas Edisons invention of the phonograph in 1877, there was rampant experimentation both
with recorded speech and music.

Its clear that part of the sales pitch when they were selling wax cylinder recorders would be to record someone speaking
and then play it backwards for them, says Case. Fittingly, the phrase mad dog (goddamn in reverse) seems to have
been a crowd favorite.

Real backmasking - intentional backwards music or speech in musical compositions - began to come into vogue during the
1940s with experimental composers like Pierre Schaeffer. Playing records (and later, tapes) backwards was, according to
Case, a way for musicians and composers to fool around with timbre and produce new and distinct sounds.

By most accounts, thats precisely what attracted the Beatles to the practice. The band famously used backward
instrumentation, including a backward guitar solo, on their 1966 album Revolver.

Rain, the B-side of Paperback Writer, has what is believed to be the first backward masked message in a pop song. Its
coda is a backwards version of the songs first line: When the rain comes, they run and hide their heads.
Yet while the Beatles may have popularized the practice, the satanic backmasking scare of the 1980s required more than
just the willful misrepresentation of a decades-old musical trend. It also needed some good old fashioned pseudoscience.

A drive-in movie theater in Fort Lee, New Jersey just happened to provide a perfect junk science laboratory. Over the course
of six weeks in 1957, unsuspecting filmgoers were the subjects of a grand marketing experiment.

Using a special high-speed projector, researcher and social psychologist James Vicary inserted the words drink Coke and
eat popcorn into movies that summer.

Invisible to the human eye, each message lasted for 1/3,000th of a second and was repeated in five-second intervals during
films on alternating nights.

By the end of the six weeks, Vicary claimed 45,699 people had been subjected to his subliminal inducements. He also
claimed that popcorn and Coke sales went up 57.5 and 18.1 percent, respectively.

At a press conference held later that same year, Vicary described the results of this now infamous study to help boost
interest in his new Subliminal Projection Company, an attempt to commercialize what he called a major breakthrough in
subliminal advertising.

The public and press went bonkers, and not in a good way.

The first sentence of an influential op-ed responding to the press conference by journalist Norman Cousins read: Welcome
to 1984.

He, like many others, wondered what such a technology could mean not just for advertisers who wanted to sell us stuff, but
also for governments seeking to steer public sentiment.
Related: The New Mind Control: Subliminal Stimulation; Controlling People Without Their Knowledge

For its own part, the FCC almost immediately threatened to suspend the broadcast license of any company that dared use
Vicarys machine.

In the years following the experiment, the CIA started looking into the operational potential of subliminal perception (they
found it exceedingly limited), and authors like Wilson Bryan Key began cranking out books such as Subliminal Seduction,
which claimed that sexual images (and the actual word sex) were being hidden in hundreds of ads.

But when the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation tried to replicate Vicarys claims by subliminally flashing the message
Call now during a popular Sunday night program, there was no increase in phone calls.

The station later told viewers they had inserted a message and asked them to guess what it might have been. Almost half of
the roughly 500 viewers claimed to have been made hungry or thirsty during the show, which aired during dinner time.
Vicarys study was clearly on the publics mind, which was problematic because it was completely made up. From the
beginning, Vicary refused to release key details about his study.

Not only was there never any independent evidence to support his claims about the effectiveness of subliminal advertising,
years later, Vicary admitted he had done only enough research to file a patent for his machine, and actually had collected
barely any data. Even worse, his machine didnt seem to work half the time once people did try to test it.

Of course, none of that mattered by the late 70s and early 80s. Subliminal messaging was being used in self-help tapes, in
department store Muzak to ward off shoplifters, and, if you believed Key, to sell the American public lots and lots of booze
and cigarettes.

Related: Television Mind Control Exposed

Fast-forward 25 years, when two psychologists from the University of Lethbridge in Alberta, Canada decided to figure out
why so many of their neighbors to the south were hearing devilish incantations in their rock music.

After being contacted by a skeptical local radio DJ who had attended one of pastor Gary Greenwalds backmasking talks,
John Vokey and his colleague Don Read agreed to come up with a series of experiments that would directly address the
idea of subliminal satanic messages.

The psychologists decided to start their study by recording a few simple passages from Lewis Carrolls Jabberwocky and the
23rd Psalm.

They wanted to find out whether the content of backward messages had any measureable influence on a listener,
consciously or otherwise.

They also wanted to see if the alleged backward messages people were hearing in rock music were perhaps more about
active construction on the listeners part and less about a devious satanic plan to corrupt young people.

After each passage was recorded forward in a few languages, Vokey and Read re-recorded them backward and played
them for 65 test subjects.

They found that the participants could discern things like the sex of the speaker with 98.9 percent accuracy when the
passages were played backwards. Subjects also displayed a better-than-chance ability to detect the language of the
backwards messages.

But when it came to deriving any kind of meaning from the passages, things didnt go as well. Another series of tests asked
subjects to categorize the content of the backwards messages as a nursery rhyme, Christian, satanic, or pornographic.

The results were no greater than chance, and the meaning of the backwards messages didnt appear to have been
understood at any level, says Vokey.

In a final experiment, the two psychologists listened to the backwards passages themselves and came up with some real
sounding phrases hidden within them. They found the following: Saw a girl with a weasel in her mouth, snatched her
nips, and, to their delight, I saw Satan. Listen below:
It wasnt as easy as it sounds, says Vokey. We had to drink a lot of beer to create those messages. The two
psychologists also invented control messages that didnt fit the phonological patterns of the samples.

Just as Vokey predicted, when subjects were instructed to listen for the phrases, they were unable to hear the control
messages but were successful in detecting the phonologically plausible ones at a rate of 84.6 percent. Mind you, this was
only after the phrases had been provided to them.

As Vokey and Read noted in their now famous article about the study, Subliminal Messages: Between the Devil and the
Media, this suggested you really could induce people to hear messages that werent there so long as they were plausible-
sounding interpretations.

How was this relevant to the satanic backmasking scare? Well, for one critical reason: Believers were almost always
providing the alleged backward masked phrases before having others listen to them. Its what happened at the 1982
California Assembly hearing, and it was the MO for religious leaders like Greenwald.

In what has become a staple of modern Intro to Psych perception lectures, professors will often play these backmasked
songs or similar garbled and distorted messages. When students arent given any guidance, almost all of them struggle to
make sense of the gibberish. Once supplied with a phonetically plausible phrase, however, suddenly they cant hear
anything but that phrase.

This is what psychologists call pareidolia. For the same reason some of us see faces on Mars and Jesus in toast, we also
can be led to hear things that arent there.

Our brains are exceptional pattern recognition machines, particularly when comes to sound and vision. Often, all it takes is a
little priming to get things rolling.

As many have noted, one of the many delicious ironies of the 80s backmasking panic is that it actually helped rekindle the
practice in popular music.

As rock bands began to regularly get accused of hiding secret satanic messages in their records, they figured: why not start
putting real messages in them? Many of these were sarcastic rebuttals to the backmasking controversy itself.

On ELOs fifth studio album, Face the Music, you can find this tongue-in-cheek message at the start of the song Fire on
High: The music is reversible, but time is not. Turn back, turn back, turn back.

Pink Floyd had some fun on The Walls Empty Spaces, as well. When played backwards, you can hear Roger Waters say:
Congratulations. You have just discovered the secret message. Please send your answer to old pink, care of the funny
farm.

Although the moral panic started to subside by the end of the 80s (less because of the scientific discrediting of subliminal
messages and more because records and cassettes gave way to CDs), musicians continued to play around with backward
masking throughout the 90s and early aughts.

Today, perhaps because most of us stream the music we listen to, hiding backwards messages in songs seems both quaint
and pointless.

Yet while Satan abandoned his plans to corrupt Americas youth through rock and roll, a devil-may-care attitude towards
science is keeping the belief in subliminal messages alive and well.
Devil Music: A History Of The Occult In Rock & Roll

Related: Devil Music: A History Of The Occult In Rock & Roll

Earlier this fall, author and journalist Ahmet Altan and his brother were arrested in Turkey. The charge? Sending out
subliminal messages suggestive of a coup attempt during a TV appearance.

Both men will stand trial for trying to overthrow the government or prevent it from carrying out its duties.

Backwards music may have fallen out of fashion, but backwards thinking is alive and well.

Related: How To Become Immune To Mind Control | How TV Affects Your Brain Chemistry For The Worse

The Orwellian War On Skepticism: Battling Fake News & Institutional Investors Now
Dominate Media Company Ownership
December 9 2016 | From: GlobalResearch / Scoop

Under the cover of battling fake news, the mainstream U.S. news media and officialdom are
taking aim at journalistic skepticism when it is directed at the pronouncements of the U.S.
government and its allies.
One might have hoped that the alarm about fake news would remind major U.S. news outlets, such as The
Washington Post and The New York Times, about the value of journalistic skepticism. However, instead, it seems
to have done the opposite.

Related: Who is Behind Fake News? Mainstream Media Use Fake Videos and Images

The idea of questioning the claims by the Wests officialdom now brings calumny down upon the heads of those who dare
do it. Truth is being redefined as whatever the U.S. government, NATO and other Western interests say is true.

Disagreement with the Wests group thinks, no matter how fact-based the dissent is, becomes fake news.

So, we have the case of Washington Post columnist David Ignatius having a starry-eyed interview with Richard Stengel, the
State Departments Undersecretary for Public Diplomacy, the principal arm of U.S. government propaganda.

Entitled The truth is losing, the column laments that the official narratives as deigned by the State Department
and The Washington Post are losing traction with Americans and the worlds public.

Stengel, a former managing editor at Time magazine, seems to take aim at Russias RT networks slogan, question
more, as some sinister message seeking to inject cynicism toward the Wests official narratives.

Theyre not trying to say that their version of events is the true one. Theyre saying: Everybodys lying! Nobodys
telling you the truth!, Stengel said.

They dont have a candidate, per se. But they want to undermine faith in democracy, faith in the West.

No Evidence

Typical of these recent mainstream tirades about this vague Russian menace, Ignatiuss column doesnt provide any
specifics regarding how RT and other Russian media outlets are carrying out this assault on the purity of Western
information.

Its enough to just toss around pejorative phrases supporting an Orwellian solution, which is to stamp out or marginalize
alternative and independent journalism, not just Russian.
The Washington Post building in downtown Washington, D.C.

Ignatius writes:

Stengel poses an urgent question for journalists, technologists and, more broadly, everyone living in free societies
or aspiring to do so. How do we protect the essential resource of democracy - the truth - from the toxin of lies that
surrounds it? Its like a virus or food poisoning. It needs to be controlled. But how?

Stengel argues that the U.S. government should sometimes protect citizens by exposing weaponized information,
false information that is polluting the ecosystem.

But ultimately, the defense of truth must be independent of a government that many people mistrust. There are
inherent dangers in having the government be the verifier of last resort, he argues.

By the way, Stengel is not the fount of truth-telling, as he and Ignatius like to pretend.

Early in the Ukraine crisis, Stengel delivered a rant against RT that was full of inaccuracies or what you might call fake
news.

Yet, what Stengel and various mainstream media outlets appear to be arguing for is the creation of a Ministry of
Truth managed by mainstream U.S. media outlets and enforced by Google, Facebook and other technology
platforms.

In other words, once these supposedly responsible outlets decide what the truth is, then questioning that narrative will earn
you virtual expulsion from the marketplace of ideas, possibly eliminated via algorithms of major search engines or marked
with a special app to warn readers not to believe what you say, a sort of yellow Star of David for the Internet age.

And then theres the possibility of more direct (and old-fashioned) government enforcement by launching FBI investigations
into media outlets that wont toe the official line. (All of these solutions have been advocated in recent weeks.)
On the other hand, if you do toe the official line that comes from Stengels public diplomacy shop, you stand to get
rewarded with government financial support. Stengel disclosed in his interview with Ignatius that his office funds
investigative journalism projects.

How should citizens who want a fact-based world combat this assault on truth? Ignatius asks, adding:

Stengel has approved State Department programs that teach investigative reporting and empower truth-
tellers.

Buying Propaganda

After reading Ignatiuss column on Wednesday, I submitted a question to the State Department asking for details on
thisjournalism and truth-telling funding that is coming from the U.S. governments top propaganda shop, but I have not
received an answer.

Related: EU Demands Social Media Websites Censor Fake News Within 24 Hours

But we do know that the U.S. government has been investing tens of millions of dollars in various media programs to
undergird Washingtons desired narratives.

For instance, in May 2015, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) issued a fact sheet summarizing its work
financing friendly journalists around the world, including:

Journalism education, media business development, capacity building for supportive institutions, and
strengthening legal-regulatory environments for free media.

USAID estimated its budget for media strengthening programs in over 30 countries at $40 million
annually, including aiding independent media organizations and bloggers in over a dozen countries.

In Ukraine before the 2014 coup ousting elected President Viktor Yanukovych and installing a fiercely anti-Russian and
U.S.-backed regime, USAID offered training in mobile phone and website security, skills that would have been quite helpful
to the coup plotters.

USAID, working with currency speculator George Soross Open Society, also has funded the Organized Crime and
Corruption Reporting Project, which engages in investigative journalism that usually goes after governments that
have fallen into disfavor with the United States and then are singled out for accusations of corruption.

The USAID-funded OCCRP collaborates with Bellingcat, an online investigative website founded by blogger Eliot Higgins.
Higgins has spread misinformation on the Internet, including discredited claims implicating the Syrian government in the
sarin attack in 2013 and directing an Australian TV news crew to what appeared to be the wrong location for a video of a
BUK anti-aircraft battery as it supposedly made its getaway to Russia after the shoot-down of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 in
2014.

Despite his dubious record of accuracy, Higgins has gained mainstream acclaim, in part, because his findings always
match up with the propaganda theme that the U.S. government and its Western allies are peddling. Higgins is now
associated with the Atlantic Council, a pro-NATO think tank which is partially funded by the U.S. State Department.

Beyond funding from the State Department and USAID, tens of millions of dollars more are flowing through the U.S.-
government-funded National Endowment for Democracy, which was started in 1983 under the guiding hand of CIA Director
William Casey.

NED became a slush fund to help finance what became known, inside the Reagan administration, as perception
management, the art of controlling the perceptions of domestic and foreign populations.

The Emergence of StratCom

Last year, as the New Cold War heated up, NATO created the Strategic Communications Command in Latvia to further
wage information warfare against Russia and individuals who were contesting the Wests narratives.
NATO headquarters in Brussels, Belgium

As veteran war correspondent Don North reported in 2015 regarding this new StratCom, the U.S. government has come to
view the control and manipulation of information as a soft power weapon, merging psychological operations, propaganda
and public affairs under the catch phrase strategic communications.

This attitude has led to treating psy-ops - manipulative techniques for influencing a target populations state of
mind and surreptitiously shaping peoples perceptions - as just a normal part of U.S. and NATOs information
policy.

Now, the European Parliament and the U.S. Congress are moving to up the ante, passing new legislation
to escalate information warfare.

On Wednesday, U.S. congressional negotiators approved $160 million to combat what they deem foreign propaganda and
the alleged Russian campaign to spread fake news. The measure is part of the National Defense Authorization Act and
gives the State Department the power to identify propaganda and counter it.

This bipartisan stampede into an Orwellian future for the American people and the worlds population follows a shoddily
sourced Washington Post article that relied on a new anonymous group that identified some 200 Internet sites, including
some of the most prominent American independent sources of news, as part of a Russian propaganda network.

Typical of this new McCarthyism, the report lacked evidence that any such network actually exists but instead targeted
cases where American journalists expressed skepticism about claims from Western officialdom.
McCarthyism is the practice of making accusations of subversion or treason without proper regard for evidence. It
also means "the practice of making unfair allegations or using unfair investigative techniques, especially in order to
restrict dissent or political criticism."

The term has its origins in the period in the United States known as the Second Red Scare, lasting roughly from
1950 to 1956 and characterized by heightened political repression against supposed communists, as well as a
campaign spreading fear of their influence on American institutions and of espionage by Soviet agents.

Originally coined to criticize the anti-communist pursuits of Republican U.S. Senator Joseph McCarthy of
Wisconsin, "McCarthyism" soon took on a broader meaning, describing the excesses of similar efforts.

The term is also now used more generally to describe reckless, unsubstantiated accusations, as well as
demagogic attacks on the character or patriotism of political adversaries.

Consortiumnews.com was included on the list apparently because we have critically analyzed some of the claims and
allegations regarding the crises in Syria and Ukraine, rather than simply accept the dominant Western group thinks.

Also on the black list were such quality journalism sites as Counterpunch, Truth-out, Truthdig, Naked Capitalism and
ZeroHedge along with many political sites ranging across the ideological spectrum.

The Fake-News Express

Normally such an unfounded conspiracy theory would be ignored, but because The Washington Post treated the
incredible allegations as credible the smear has taken on a life of its own, reprised by cable networks and republished by
major newspapers.
Related: My interview with former CBS star reporter: fake news

But the unpleasant truth is that the mainstream U.S. news media is now engaged in its own fake-news campaign
about fake news. Its publishing bogus claims invented by a disreputable and secretive outfit that just recently popped up
on the Internet. If that isnt fake news, I dont know what is.

Yet, despite the Posts clear violations of normal journalistic practices, surely, no one there will pay a price,
anymore than there was accountability for the Post reporting as flat fact that Iraq was hiding WMD in 2002-2003.

Fred Hiatt, the editorial-page editor most responsible for that catastrophic group think, is still in the same job
today.

Two nights ago, MSNBCs Chris Matthews featured the spurious Washington Post article in a segment that - like similar
rehashes - didnt bother to get responses from the journalists being slandered.

I found that ironic since Matthews repeatedly scolds journalists for their failure to look skeptically at U.S.
government claims about Iraq possessing WMD as justification for the disastrous Iraq War.

However, now Matthews joins in smearing journalists who have applied skepticism to U.S. and Western
propaganda claims about Syria and/or Ukraine.
MSNBCs Hardball host Chris Matthews

While the U.S. Congress and the European Parliament begin to take action to shut down or isolate dissident sources of
information all in the name of democracy - a potentially greater danger is that mainstream U.S. news outlets are already
teaming up with technology companies, such as Google and Facebook, to impose their own determinations about truth on
the Internet.

Or, as Ignatius puts it in his column reflecting Undersecretary for Public Diplomacy Stengels thinking;

The best hope may be the global companies that have created the social-media platforms.They see this
information war as an existential threat, says Stengel.

The real challenge for global tech giants is to restore the currency of truth. Perhaps machine
learning [presumably a reference to algorithms] can identify falsehoods and expose every argument that uses
them.

Perhaps someday, a human-machine process will create what Stengel describes as a global ombudsman for
information.

Ministry of Truth

An organization of some 30 mainstream media companies already exists, including not only The Washington Post and The
New York Times but also the Atlantic Council-connected Bellingcat, as the emerging arbiters or ombudsmen for truth,
something Orwell described less flatteringly as a Ministry of Truth.
Big Brother poster illustrating George Orwells novel about modern propaganda, 1984

The New York Times has even editorialized in support of Internet censorship, using the hysteria over fake news to justify
the marginalization or disappearance of dissident news sites.

It now appears that this 1984-ish MiniTrue will especially target journalistic skepticism when applied to U.S. government
and mainstream media group thinks.

Yet, in my four decades-plus in professional journalism, I always understood that skepticism was a universal journalistic
principle, one that should be applied in all cases, whether a Republican or a Democrat is in the White House or whether
some foreign leader is popular or demonized.
Related: The Ultimate Fake News List: The mainstream media is the primary source of the most harmful, most
inaccurate news ever

As we have seen in recent years, failure to ask tough questions and to challenge dubious claims from government
officials and mainstream media outlets can get lots of people killed, both U.S. soldiers and citizens of countries
invaded or destabilized by outsiders.

To show skepticism is not the threat to democracy that Undersecretary Stengel and columnist Ignatius appear to think it is.

Whether you like or dislike RTs broadcasts - or more likely have never seen one - a journalist really cant question its
slogan: question more. Questioning is the essence of journalism and, for that matter, democracy.

[In protest of the Posts smearing of independent journalists, RootsAction has undertaken a petition drive, which can
be found here.]

PETITION: Defend Independent Media From Fake News Attacks

Ask President-elect Donald Trump to take a stand against the establishment's desperate move to label
independent media as fake news.

This is a red level emergency.

Infowars, Breitbart, the Drudge Report and other independent sources are destroying the mainstream media
narrative like never before, and the establishment is getting desperate.

In an effort to try and censor the liberty movement and free speech, the mainstream media is now attempting to
label legitimate news sources like Infowars as "fake news" to push towards a government-led shut down of
Infowars.com.
The Washington Post has even gone as far as to label sites like Infowars as "Russian propaganda fake
news" web sites, exemplifying the last attempt of a dying media conglomerate to force out any and all
dissenting voices.

Even more concerning, the United States House of Representatives quietly passed legislation
targeting 'Russian propaganda' websites.

But the calls for censorship do not end with the United States.

The European Union is demanding that Twitter, YouTube and Facebook censor illegal hate speech
within 24 hours and content that includes so-called fake news, a term so broad that it includes perfectly
legitimate news content.

Microsoft, Facebook, YouTube and Twitter have also announced that they will be ramping up efforts to remove
"extremist" content from their websites by using a shared database of offenders.

And perhaps most importantly, Twitter has recently gone on record stating the company will ban
President-Elect Donald J. Trump's Twitter account if he were to violate the company's "hate speech" rules.

We are calling on and asking President-Elect Donald J. Trump to take a stand against the establishment media's
"fake news" attacks and to stop the impending censorship of independent media platforms like Infowars.com and
others.

Click here to go to the petition page

Related: US House Bill 6393 Passed to Counter Russian Fake News & its Repeaters

Institutional Investors Now Dominate Media Company Ownership

Institutional investors now dominate the ownership and governance of New Zealand media
companies, according to the sixth annual update on local media ownership from the Auckland
University of Technology's Journalism, Media and Democracy Research Centre.
"For the first time in six years, our media companies are exclusively owned by financial institutions and it is in their
interest to push structural changes through," the report's author, Merja Myllylahti, says in a review of a sector in
which two major mergers are proposed: between news publishers NZME and the New Zealand assets of Australian
media firm Fairfax Media; and between Vodafone New Zealand and Sky Network Television.

Related: Is the US Government Behind the Fake News Media Attacks on President-elect Trump?

Media owners have largely pulled out of the sector, she notes.

"Many of the directors have no declared media interests, but have directorships in financial firms and corporate
advisory businesses.The board structures of media corporates support further consolidation."

The report lists the most significant events in New Zealand media ownership this year as:

NZME separating from its Australian parent APN News & media, to become a standalone NZX-listed company; Rupert
Murdoch's News Corp selling all its NZME shares, inherited as a result of the APN split; the proposed merger between
NZME and Fairfax's New Zealand assets; Vodafone proposing a merger with Sky Network Television; and TV3 owner
MediaWorks getting a new board and senior management.
NZME, publisher of the New Zealand Herald newspaper and website and the Newstalk ZB radio network among
other assets, is 85.6 percent-owned by financial institutions, she said.

Myllylahti painted a grim outlook for traditional news publishers, saying merging was;

Not a solution for NZMEs and Fairfaxs troubled business models".

"The market challenges remain the same."

She noted a report by David Kaynes, an Australian-based analyst for multinational investment bankers Citi, reported in
Australian media yesterday, suggesting Fairfax's flagship titles in Australia have no future if digital revenue continues to
decline.

The only way for the merged company to stabilise its revenue in the short-term is to implement cost savings and
cut hundreds of jobs, and it is their intention to do so," said Myllylahti.
The report notes that media and telecommunications consolidation is accelerating in many countries.

The relations and dependencies between news media corporations, social media companies, search engines,
chat providers, and news app companies became increasingly intertwined and complex" in 2016.

NZME and Fairfax are arguing they must merge to have a chance of competing with global platforms like Facebook and
Google, which are becoming go-to venues for news while hoovering up digital advertising revenues, which are a far smaller
than the total pool of advertising spend once available to newspaper publishers.
That's in spite of new evidence that the total proportion of all ad spending committed to digital channels is growing fast.

The Standard Media Index, a measure of New Zealand advertising spend, shows some 31.6 percent of total ad spending
was on digital from January to September this year was 31.6 percent, compared with 26.2 percent in the same period last
year and 11.6 percent for the same period five years ago.

Related: Why I named my web site no-more-fake-news in 2001

In Connected World, Users Are Getting Reared As Slaughter Animals + Facebook


Employees Are Quitting Because Of Users Being Censored
December 8 2016 | From: Arnoldit / TheAntiMedia

Yahoo, Facebook, Google, WhatsApp, Instagram and Microsoft all have one thing in common; for
any service that they provide for free, they are harnessing your private data to be sold to
advertisers.
Related: This $5 Device Can Hack Your Locked Computer In One Minute

Mirror UK recently published an Op-Ed titled Who Is Spying on You? What Yahoo Hack Taught Us About Facebook,
Google, and WhatsApp in which the author says:

Think about this for a second. All those emails youve written and received with discussions about politics and
people that were assumed to be private and meant as inside jokes for you and your friends were being filtered
through CIA headquarters. Kind of makes you wonder what youve written in the past few years, doesnt it?

The services be it free email or free instant messaging have been designed and developed in such a way that the
companies that own them end up with a humongous amount of information about its users.

This data is sugarcoated and called as Big Data. It is then sold to advertisers and marketers who in the garb of providing
immersive and customized user experience follow every click of yours online. This is akin to rearing animals for slaughtering
them later.
The data is not just for sale to the corporates; law enforcement agencies can snoop on you without any warrants. As pointed
out in the article:

While hypocritical in many ways, these tech giants are smart enough to know who butters their bread and that the
perception of trust outweighs the reality of it.

But isnt it the government who ultimately ends up with the data if a company is intentionally spying on us and
building a huge record about each of us?

None of the tech giants accept this fact, but most are selling your data to the government, including companies like
Samsung that are into the hardware business.

Is there are a way that can help you evade this online snooping? Probably no if you consider mainstream services and
social media platforms. Till then, if you want to stay below the radar, delete your accounts and data on all mainstream email
service providers, instant messaging apps, service providing websites and social media platform.

Related Articles:

How a Grad Student Found Spyware That Could Control Anybodys iPhone from Anywhere in the World

Google is Quietly Recording Everything You Say - Heres How to Hear It, Delete It, and Stop It

Twitter Threatens To Kill Trumps Account

Google will tell you how crowded your favorite bar is in real time

Facebook Employees Are Quitting Because Of Users Being Censored


The war on fake news embarked upon by Facebook, Google, and Twitter may be earning the
media goliaths brownie points with establishment politicos, but users - and even employees -
arent feeling as enthusiastic.

In the midst of backlash over the stunning victory of President-elect Donald Trump, which some people attribute to the
preponderance of apocryphal headlines disseminated by Internet search engines and social media platforms, the
companies are tweaking their algorithms in order to target specifically blacklisted sites, many of which happen to be
alternative media sites that question the political and media establishment.

Related: YouTube, Facebook, Twitter & Microsoft Removing extremist content in 2017

Many of the sites are also financially dependent on ad revenue earned by organic and referral traffic directed by Google,
Facebook, and Twitter.

Now, it appears Facebooks new algorithmic censorship practices are causing some of its employees to quit. According to
the New York Times, three current and former anonymous employees claim the company has had a new tool developed
specifically to restrict certain kinds of posts from appearing in users news feeds in certain geographic areas.
This form of censorship has been deployed under the auspices of facilitating Facebooks entry into the Chinese market.
Previously, the company did this in Pakistan, Russia, and Turkey, where the respective governments requested the ability
for third parties to review and block posted content. Facebook granted the requests and removed approximately 55,000 total
pieces of content.

Now Facebook wants access to 1.4 billion people in the worlds second-largest economy, China, and they are willing to
adhere to draconian censorship practices in order to do so. It could be a complete coincidence that this new push happens
to coincide with Facebooks crackdown on alternative media, which has caused several employees to tender their
resignations.

A Facebook spokeswoman responded to the report in a statement:

We have long said that we are interested in China, and are spending time understanding and learning more about
the country. However, we have not made any decision on our approach to China.

Our focus right now is on helping Chinese businesses and developers expand to new markets outside China by
using our ad platform.

The question now is whether there is a connection between two different but simultaneous pushes for censorship by the
largest social media platform in the world.

Is The Global-Warming Hustle Finally Falling Apart?


December 7 2016 | From: JonRappoport

(Al Gore stuffed $98 million into his lockbox while "saving the world")
When you see a problem defined as a threat to all humans, you can be sure Globalists are using that fake or real
problem to impose control on all humans. (The Underground. Jon Rappoport)

Related: US-developed weapon system 'HAARP' may cause global warming - India

With the election of Donald Trump, climate change and global warming have come back into the spotlight. In a different way.

The science is settled isnt good enough now.

Neither is the Globalist plan to cut energy production in every country in the world, in order to rescue us from frying.

LA Times:

Donald Trump will be about the only head of state who does not believe in climate science or the responsibility of
his government to act, said Michael Brune, executive director of the Sierra Club

But all along, there have been dissenters from the manmade warming mantra; they just havent been allowed inside
government portals.
Freeman Dyson, physicist and mathematician, professor emeritus at Princetons Institute for Advanced Study, Fellow of the
Royal Society, winner of the Lorentz Medal, the Max Planck Medal, the Fermi Award:

What has happened in the past 10 years is that the discrepancies [in climate change models] between whats
observed and whats predicted have become much stronger.

Its clear now the models are wrong, but it wasnt so clear 10 years ago Im 100 per cent Democrat myself, and I
like Obama. But he took the wrong side on this [climate change] issue, and the Republicans took the right side

- The Register, October 11, 2015

Dr. Ivar Giaever, Nobel-prize winner in Physics (1973), reported by Climate Depot, July 8, 2015:

Global warming is a non-problemI say this to Obama: Excuse me, Mr. President, but youre wrong. Dead
wrong.

Green Guru James Lovelock, who once predicted imminent destruction of the planet via global warming:

The computer models just werent reliable. In fact, Im not sure the whole thing isnt crazy, this climate change.

- The Guardian, September 30, 2016

And these are but a tiny fraction of the statements made by dissident scientists who reject manmade global warming.

The science is only settled in government circles where leaders have climbed on board the Globalist plan to undermine
economies all over the world by grossly lowering energy production, as a way to reduce warming.

One of the major warming hustlers is, of course, Al Gore.


Consider facts laid out in an uncritical Washington Post story (October 10, 2012, Al Gore has thrived as a green-tech
investor):

In 2001, Al was worth less than $2 million. By 2012, it was estimated hed locked up a nice neat $100 million.

How did he do it? Well, he invested in 14 green companies, who inhaled - via loans, grants and tax relief -
somewhere in the neighborhood of $2.5 billion from the Federal government to go greener.

Therefore, Gores investments paid off, because the Federal government was providing massive cash backup to those
companies. Its nice to have Federal friends in high places.

For example, Gores investment firm at one point held 4.2 million shares of an outfit called Iberdrola Renovables, which was
building 20 wind farms across the United States.

Iberdrola was blessed with $1.5 billion from the Federal government for the work which, by its own admission, saved its
corporate financial bacon. Every little bit helps.

Then there was a company called Johnson Controls. It made batteries, including those for electric cars. Gores investment
company, Generation Investment Management (GIM), doubled its holdings in Johnson Controls in 2008, when shares cost
as little $9 a share. GIM sold when shares cost $21 to $26 - before the market for electric-car batteries fell on its head.

For a while, the going was good. To make it go good, Johnson Controls had been bolstered by $299 million dropped at its
doorstep by the administration of President Barack Obama.
On the side, Gore had been giving speeches on the end of life as we know it on planet Earth, for as much as $175,000 a
pop. (It isnt really on the side. Gore was constantly on the move from conference to conference, spewing jet fumes in his
wake.) Those lecture fees can add up.

So Gore, as of 2012, had $100 million.

The man has worked every angle to parlay fear of global-warming catastrophes into a humdinger of a personal fortune. And
he didnt achieve his new status in the free market. The Federal government has been helping out with major, major bucks.
This wasnt an entrepreneur relying exclusively on his own smarts and hard work. Far from it.

- How many scientists and other PhDs have been just saying no to the theory of manmade global warming?

A letter to The Wall Street Journal signed by 16 scientists just said no. Among the luminaries: William Happer, professor of
physics at Princeton University; Richard Lindzen, professor of atmospheric sciences at Massachusetts Institute of
Technology; William Kininmonth, former head of climate research at the Australian Bureau of Meteorology.

And then there was the Global Warming Petition Project, or the Oregon Petition, that just said no. According to
Petitionproject.org, the petition has the signatures of 31,487 American scientists, of which 9,029 stated they had
Ph.D.s.

Global warming is one of the Rockefeller Globalists chief issues.

Manipulating it entails convincing populations that a massive intervention is necessary to stave off the imminent collapse of
all life on Earth. Therefore, sovereign nations must be eradicated. Political power and decision-making must flow from
above, from those who are wiser.
Al Gore is one of their front men. He jets here and he jets there, carrying their messages. Hes their delivery kid.

And for his work, he is paid $100 million - a drop in the bucket.

A final note about the science of global warming -

A hypothesis is a provisional statement that remains to be confirmed through experiments. Confirmation means making a
correct prediction. Not just any prediction, but a useful one.

Take this hypothesis: The Earth has become warmer by X degrees over the past 1000 years.

Putting all the chatter aside, have scientists deployed this hypothesis to make accurate, specific, and useful predictions
about warming?

So far, the answer is no.

That eliminates, for the time being, the acceptance of the warming hypothesis. Many predictions have been made,
many alarm bells have been rung, many dire warnings have been issued, many threats have been launchedbut
no correct and useful predictions.

However, scientists will say their (rejected) hypothesis is also a statement of fact. That is, it is a summary of a warming trend
derived from thousands of measurements of temperatures, now and in the past, on land, sea, and air.

Scientists will also claim their investigation reveals humans have directly and significantly contributed to a recent warming
trend.

At this point, we are leaving the method of hypothesizing and predicting, and moving to a debate about the accuracy of all
those temperature measurements and the causes of any actual climate changes.
Among scientists, there is a great deal of disagreement about the accuracy of the measurements. Any fair examination of
studies and their critics will reveal that.

In this regard, the science is not settled. Far from it.

So: useless as a hypothesis, the assertion of manmade warming, as fact, is wide open to debate. To say the least.

Yet... based on this non-proof, Globalists want all national governments on the planet to commit to lowering energy
production by a significant and destructive percentage in the next 15 years - to save us from a horrible fate.

Their real agenda is clear:

The only solution to climate change is a global energy-management network. We (the Globalist leaders) are in the
best position to manage such a system. We will allocate mandated energy-use levels throughout planet Earth,
region by region, nation by nation, and eventually, citizen by citizen.

Yes, citizen by citizen.

This is the long-term goal. This is the Globalists Holy Grail. Slavery imposed through energy.

Related: Media falsely spinning Trump climate comments

If You Question The Establishment You Are Guilty Of Espionage, Says Corporate
Media - Because Russia + The Fake News Furor And The Threat Of Internet
Censorship
December 4 2016 | From: ActivistPost / GlobalResearch
Mainstream, corporate media has launched a dangerous and slanderous campaign to label any
news outlet not spewing accepted governmental narrative as professional Russian propagandists -
and those unaware theyd apparently been duped by Russia, useful idiots.

Ordinarily, the complete dearth of proof this claim has even a shred of truth would cause a reflexive eye roll but
in this case, the American exceptionalist machine behind the supposed analysis calls for FBI and Department of
Justice to investigate possible violations of Espionage Act.

Related: Establishment Media Declares War On Their Competition As Fake News

Conflating legitimate journalism with espionage because it refutes a narrative acceptable to the establishment is
categorically ludicrous.

This irresponsible, criminal violation of ethics devoid of any journalistic integrity came from the Washington Post, which
reported two teams of independent researchers discovered The Russians were behind fake news articles to help
Donald Trump win the election and undermine faith in American democracy.

It could be said you cant make this up - but apparently thats exactly what these so-called expert researchers
did.

The flood of fake news this election season got support from a sophisticated Russian propaganda campaign that
created and spread misleading articles online with the goal of punishing Democrat Hillary Clinton, helping
Republican Donald Trump and undermining faith in American democracy, say independent researchers who
tracked the operation, the Post declared in its lede.

Russias increasingly sophisticated propaganda machinery - including thousands of botnets, teams of paid human trolls,
and networks of websites and social-media accounts - echoed and amplified right-wing sites across the Internet as they
portrayed Clinton as a criminal hiding potentially fatal health problems and preparing to hand control of the nation to a
shadowy cabal of global financiers.
Who would have thunk such a thing?

The effort also sought to heighten the appearance of international tensions and promote fear of looming hostilities with
nuclear-armed Russia.

Related: The Myth Of Aggressive Russia

However, as has been the highly-suspect tendency thus far in the corporate medias war on ostensible disinformation,
literally no evidence accompanied the Posts report - nor the analyses provided by these two putatively independent
research groups - making the article a prime example of libel.
Related: House Quietly Passes Bill Targeting "Russian Propaganda" Websites

In fact, the credibility of this reporting is so wet tissue paper-flimsy, even the mainstream outlet Fortune refuted the contents
in an article appropriately titled, No, Russian Agents Are Not Behind Every Piece of Fake News You See, because
the case starts to come apart at the seams the more you look at it.

Fortune notes one of the two research groups, the Foreign Policy Institute, is:

A conservative think tank funded and staffed by proponents of the Cold War between the U.S. and Russia, which
says it has been researching Russian propaganda since 2014.

PropOrNot, the other group publishing the exhaustive list of even award-winning sites, tweets and retweets anti-Russian
sentiments from a variety of sources, has only existed since August of this year, according to Fortune. And an article
announcing the launch of the group on its website is dated last month.
None of the supposedly multiple people responsible for the fledgling PropOrNot website are named, even by the Post.

Its executive director, whom the Post quoted on the condition of anonymity to avoid being targeted by Russias legions
of skilled hackers- a laughable excuse worthy of its own tinfoil hat - claims;

The way that this propaganda apparatus supported Trump was equivalent to some massive amount of a media
buy. It was like Russia was running a super PAC for Trumps campaign... It worked.

Once again, the Russia did it narrative belies the underlying establishment frustration and inability to come to
terms with the loss of democratic election - a loss alternative, independent media undoubtedly assisted, but not for
the tiresome reasons corporate outlets repeat ad infinitum.

Hillary Clinton did not lose the 2016 presidential election because some shady, Russian-government crafted cabal of non-
mainstream outlets plotted her downfall for the benefit of Donald Trump. Indeed, most of the outlets listed - including The
Free Thought Project - castigated both Clinton and Trump when pertinent information became available.

No, Hillary Clinton lost because - even faced with as contentious a character as megalomaniacal Trump - the American
populace has grown too weary of Washington politics-as-usual, foreign policy-as-usual, and corruption-as-usual.

Related: McCarthyism Is Breaking Out All Over - Paul Craig Roberts

Independent media did a phenomenal job reporting on revelations published by WikiLeaks, and equally stellar
slaying of U.S. government propaganda reported as legitimate news by irresponsible corporate media presstitutes,
who some time ago abandoned journalism for establishment acceptance.

Pointing fingers will never make this any less true - and, in actuality, only deepens the shameful dereliction of journalistic
duty.

To wit, the Posts regurgitating this thinly veneered anti-Russian agenda as fact, when literally no investigation was
undertaken - no one contacted the outlets on this list to offer their side, for example - is precisely the sort of fake news the
establishment insists it needs to fight.

Fortune points out:

Theres also little data available on the PropOrNot report, which describes a network of 200 sites who it says are
routine peddlers of Russian propaganda, which have what it calls a combined audience of 15 million Americans.
How is that audience measured?

We dont know. Stories promoted by this network were shared 213 million times, it says. How do we know this?
Thats unclear."

Once again, we have literally unverifiable information coughed up by unknown entities, who employed unknown methods to
produce a blacklist of media sites - which incidentally includes a disparate mishmash from Ron Paul and Chris Hedges, to
the Drudge Report and Lew Rockwell - that the public should deem verboten because they said so. That, and because
Russia.

As The Intercepts Glenn Greenwald tweeted:

Yes, the WashPost is saying: some people who we wont identify, using methodologies we wont describe, created This
Important Blacklist!

Again, though its difficult not to laugh at this altogether ironic travesty, the peril lies in these unknown entities at
PropOrNot suggesting these outlets and the journalists behind them have violated the Espionage Act, the Foreign
Agent Registration Act, and other related laws, but determining that is up to the FBI and the DOJ.

Just two paragraphs prior, PropOrNot paradoxically claims it fiercely believe in the rights to freedom of expression and
freedom of the press, and have no interest in seeing anyone punished for exercising them.
Although PropOrNot flatly claims its questionably researched and flagrantly unvetted list shouldnt be considered
McCarthyistic, well, it is.

So in other words, any and every one who is anything but a liberal drone is now a Russian plant? Zero Hedge,
which also landed a spot on the Everyone the Establishment Dislikes Is a Russian Agent list, asked rhetorically. McCarthy
would be proud.

Related: The Major Purveyor of Fake News is the CIA-Corporate Complex

The Fake News Furor And The Threat Of Internet Censorship

In the weeks since the November 8 election, US media reports on the spread of so-called fake
news during the presidential campaign have increasingly repeated unsubstantiated pre-election
claims that the Russian government hacked into Democratic Party email servers to undermine the
campaign of Hillary Clinton.

There is more than a whiff of McCarthyism in this crusade against fake news on social media and the Internet,
with online publications critical of US wars of aggression and other criminal activities being branded as Russian
propaganda outlets.

Related: Fake News List Death Knell for MSM-Paul Craig Roberts

A case in point is an article published in the November 24 edition of the Washington Post headlined Russian propaganda
effort helped spread fake news during election, experts say.

The article includes assertions that Russian botnets, teams of paid human trolls, and networks of web sites and social
media accounts were used to promote sites across the Internet;

"As they portrayed Clinton as a criminal hiding potentially fatal health problems and preparing to hand
control of the nation to a shadowy cabal of global financiers.
Comment: Well they may not have been Russian bot-nets but they sure as hell were real people who have woken
up to the reality of that the psychopathic luciferial control-freak establishment wanted...

According to the Post, the exposure of Russian involvement in the spread of fake election news is based on the work of a
team of independent researchers and another anonymous group calling itself PropOrNot, which has expertise in computer
science, national security and public policy.

Oh for the love of Christ who do they think believes this hore shit anymore?

Pathetic.

Although no one from the PropOrNot organization is mentioned by name, the Post quotes the executive director of this
group anonymously. The organization has gone so far as to publish a list of 200 web sites - including WikiLeaks, the ultra-
right Drudge Report and the left-liberal Truthout - that are deemed routine peddlers of Russian propaganda.

It should be obvious that the Post report is itself an example of the state-sponsored pseudo-news that is
increasingly dispensed by the corporate-controlled media to promote the geopolitical and military aims of
American imperialism.

The New York Times has published similar articles, including one authored by David E. Sanger and posted on
the Times web site on November 25 under the headline US Officials Defend Integrity of Vote, Despite Hacking Fears.

Sanger, the chief Washington correspondent of the Times, is a regular sounding board for the military/intelligence
establishment, to which he is closely plugged in. He writes that:

Intelligence officials are still investigating the impact of a broader Russian information warfare campaign, in which
fake news about Mrs. Clinton, and about United States-Russia relations, appeared intended to influence voters.

He adds, Many of those false reports originated from RT News and Sputnik, two state-funded Russian sites.
The readers of this and virtually all other articles on the topic of Russias role in fake news will search in vain for a single
piece of evidence to substantiate the claims made.

Instead, the views and opinions of experts, usually unnamed, are cited and treated as indisputable fact - much in
the manner of Joe McCarthy and similar witch-hunters.

The editors and writers who produce these articles seem not even to notice that their publications have been caught in one
colossal lie after another - from the claims of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction used to justify the illegal invasion and
occupation of Iraq in 2003 to the more recent flood of government propaganda in support of neo-colonial wars in Libya and
Syria and drone killings in a growing number of countries - all justified in the name of human rights and the war on terror.

There are no institutions anywhere in the world more adept at producing fake news than the American corporate-
controlled media.

These same media outlets further discredited themselves by overtly slanting their news coverage of the election campaign
in favor of their preferred candidate, Hillary Clinton, and predicting that she would secure a decisive victory.

Blindsided by the support for Trump among disaffected and angry lower-income people and taken unawares by the electoral
collapse of the Democrats, the corporate media are responding to the growth of popular distrust by seeking to discredit
alternative news sources.

Related: Dear Donald Trump: Blockade the lying mainstream media and recognize the independent media as
America's real free press

This is not to deny the spread of false information and propaganda masquerading as news on the Internet.

Fabricated news stories and hoaxes have been circulating online since the World Wide Web began in the 1990s, but there
was a significant increase in fake political sites and content during the US elections.

Stories that stretched the truth or were entirely made up typically started on mock news web sites and were then amplified
by social media sharing.

Related: Putin awaits my application for citizenship, says Russian agent Paul Craig Roberts

Other false reports originated on platforms such as Facebook and Twitter and spread rapidly with the like, share and
comment features of social media.

An analysis published by Buzzfeed on November 16 showed that false political news stories in the final three
months of the election campaign, such as a report that the Pope had endorsed Trump for president, generated
more engagement on Facebook than the combined top stories of nineteen major US news organizations.

The Buzzfeed study noted the hyperpartisan right-wing nature of the top fabricated news items, as well as the spike in the
number of visitors to these sites during the final election months.

Another key aspect of online fake news has been the growth of its scope internationally. The Guardian reported in August,
for example, that a group of teenagers and college students from Veles, Macedonia set up dozens of political web site
faades to both influence and cash in on the Trump candidacy.

The Guardian report also pointed out that, although the pro-Trump sham news sites were more popular, both offshore and
domestic web sites became very popular and generated income for their publishers whether they were peddling phony
conservative or liberal misinformation.

That being said, the campaign in the corporate media against fake news on the Internet, including calls for social media
outlets such as Google and Facebook to vet the material that appears on their sites, is a reactionary attack on freedom of
the press.

It has already elicited positive responses from major Internet sites.


Both Google and Facebook have published statements acknowledging that they are working on systems that will
use third-party fact-checking of news content published on their services.

In the case of Facebook, this initiative - reminiscent of Orwells Thought Police - will be reinforced by barring
accounts identified as fake news sources from using online advertising tools.

Pressure to shut down or muzzle fake news sites and social media accounts are emanating from the offices of corporate
media organizations concerned about the loss of their influence over the public. Any moves to censor Internet content must
be opposed as an attack on democratic rights.

The measures being prepared today against fake news web sites and social media publishers will be perfected and used
tomorrow against the working class and the socialist media - the World Socialist Web Site - that articulates and fights for its
independent interests.

Related: FAKE NEWS: Newsweek Admits They Didnt Proof Read Madam President Issue; They Didnt Even Write
It

Climate Intervention: A Government Cover-Up Of Epic Proportions


December 3 2016 | From: WND

I recently addressed how CIA Director John Brennan gave a historic speech to the Council on
Foreign Relations, confessing something few thought they would ever hear: the federal
governments explicit and intentional climate intervention via operations like stratospheric aerosol
spraying or injections, or SAI.
What I didnt explain is that SAI is a ginormous federal geo-engineering cover up that is now being exposed, and
yet not a single mainstream media outlet has reported on it. Let me explain.

Related: The Real Fake News exposed: '97% of scientists agree on climate change' is an engineered hoax... here's
what the media never told you

In April, the U.S. Senate directed the Department of Energy (DOE) to review the findings of the National Academy [of
Sciences, or NAS] report, Climate Intervention: Reflecting Sunlight to Cool Earth, and to study the potential impacts of
albedo modification [or solar radiation management], a potential method of geoengineering, which included smaller scale
field trials.

Science magazine explained:

Albedo modification would work by lacing the atmosphere with tiny particles or aerosols that would reflect sunlight
and mimic natural processes.

For example, in 1991 the volcano Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines spewed 20 million tons of sulfur dioxide into
the stratosphere, which spans altitudes from 10 to 50 kilometers.

There, the sulfur dioxide produced aerosols that reflected enough sunlight to reduce global temperature by an
estimated 0.3C for 3 years.

Albedo modification might also work by using aerosols to seed cloud formation in a lower atmospheric layer called
the troposphere.

The U.S. Senate pushed the DOE to pursue albedo modification action a couple months before CIA Director Brennan gave
his blessing to stratospheric spraying as a government operation that potentially could help reverse the warming effects of
global climate change.
Whats crazy about all that government endorsement is that the February 2015 NAS report, on which the feds base their
entire toxic rain operation;

Warned explicitly that albedo modification shouldnt be deployed now because the risks and benefits
were far too uncertain.

What are those risks? Here are just three grave consequences that we know about:

Drought: The team under Chien Wang, a co-author of the NAS study and a senior research scientist at MITs Center for
Global Change Science and the Department of Earth, concluded that albedo modification would lead;

To dangerous changes in global weather: Precipitation would also decline worldwide, and some parts of the world
would be worse off. Europe, the Horn of Africa, and Pakistan may receive less rainfall than they have historically.

Loss of blue sky: According to a report by the New Scientist, Ben Kravitz of the Carnegie Institution for Science explained,
Releasing sulphate aerosols high in the atmosphere should in theory reduce global temperatures by reflecting a small
percentage of the incoming sunlight away from the Earth.

Related: Trump Picks Top Climate Skeptic to Lead EPA Transition

However, the extra particles would also scatter more of the remaining light into the atmosphere. This would reduce by 20
per cent the amount of sunlight that takes a direct route to the ground, and it would increase levels of softer, diffuse
scattered light, making the sky appear hazier.

Hazards to human health and other earth life: The gravest of all consequences of atmospheric aerosol spraying is that,
simply put, whats sprayed above us settles down upon us and in us, as well as other life on earth.

The U.S. governments own National Center for Biotechnology Information, or NCBI, released a report in January 2016, the
goal of which was Assessing the direct occupational and public health impacts of solar radiation management with
stratospheric aerosols. The NCBI concluded:

Our analysis suggests that adverse public health impacts may reasonably be expected from SRM via deployment
of stratospheric aerosols.

Little is known about the toxicity of some likely candidate aerosols, and there is no consensus regarding
acceptable levels for public exposure to these materials.

There is also little infrastructure in place to evaluate potential public health impacts in the event that stratospheric
aerosols are deployed for solar radiation management.

No wonder the co-author of the study on Climate Intervention, Dr. James Fleming, called geo-engineering like
SAI: untested and untestable, and dangerous beyond belief.

Related: A new study suggests that carbon-hungry plants help keep atmospheric CO2 levels in check

Another colleague and co-author, Dr. Raymond T. Pierrehumbert, the Louis Block professor in geophysical sciences at the
University of Chicago, and Swedens King Carl XVI Gustafn, chairman in environmental science at Stockholms Universitet,
took it one step further. He warned;
The nearly two years worth of reading and animated discussions that went into this study have
convinced me more than ever that the idea of fixing the climate by hacking the Earths reflection of
sunlight is wildly, utterly, howlingly barking mad.

(That is why Dr. Pierrehumbert prefers to call albedo modification by the name albedo hacking.)

Dr. Pierrehumber added: The report describes albedo modification frankly as involving large and partly unknown risks. It
states outright that albedo modification should not be deployed.'

So, why are the U.S. Senate and CIA director disregarding the dire and passionate warnings of scientists like Dr.
Pierrehumbert and Dr. Fleming by demanding that the Department of Energy proceed with trials on geo-engineering? In the
words of Dr. Pierrehumber, are they wildly, utterly, howlingly barking mad? Answer: Yes!

Is it a mere coincidence that the very government agencies that are spraying our stratosphere with toxic chemicals were the
actual sponsors of the NAS report? The NAS itself confessed:

The study was sponsored by the National Academy of Sciences, U.S. intelligence community, National
Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and U.S. Department of
Energy (italics mine).

Isnt that like your right hand quoting your left hand so that your right hand can grab what its already holding? Is
the NAS report another government push and ploy to collaborate and cite scientific proof to justify its clandestine
climate agenda?

Why else would the CIA and U.S. Senate be proceeding in climate aerosol spraying when the very scientists
preparing the study warned, Stop! Dont do it! Its crazy and dangerous!

The most colossal and tragic of all government cover-ups is the fact that the feds have been waging climate warfare for
more than 30 years, lacing our clouds and stratosphere with dangerous nano-particles, including environmental sulfates,
black carbon, metallic aluminum and aluminum oxide aerosols.
The truth is, for decades, the feds have been covertly and overtly running sky criminal operations behind (above!) our backs,
leaving humans and the rest of the planet life as lab rats of their toxic cocktail fallout.

Geoengineeringwatch.org reported that a 1978 750-page congressional report was recently discovered with a mountain of
information going back decades that confirms the ongoing extensive involvement of our government in climate
modification/weather warfare.

This document also confirms the involvement of foreign governments around the globe, even governments that would
otherwise have been considered hostile to US interests.'

Why hasnt a single mainstream media outlet reported on the CIA and DOEs march forward with SAI when the scientific
community has explicitly and repeatedly warned against it?

Why are geo-engineering researchers being stonewalled by government and media?

And why in hell are watchdogs on both the left and right dodging the feds intentional and hazardous climate intervention,
when they seek to uncover government cover-ups and conspiracies with the most scant of evidence?

Dane Wigington, the lead researcher for GeoengineeringWatch.org and a fierce fighter for government geoengineering
transparency, was absolutely right when he wrote: How big does the climate engineering elephant in the room need to be
before it can no longer be hidden in plain site?
How much more historical proof do we need of the ongoing climate engineering/weather warfare before the denial of the
masses crumbles? When will populations around the globe bring to justice all those responsible for the ongoing and rapidly
worsening worldwide weather warfare assault?

Is it a mere coincidence that, in October 2015, the feds put a universal gag order on agency employees in The National
Weather Service, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the U.S. Dept. of Commerce?

Is it a mere coincidence that the Obama administration has spent more taxpayer monies for legal prosecutions of
government whistleblowers than all other U.S. presidents combined, resulting in 31 times the jail sentences?
Its time to blow the lid off the governments climate cover-up!

That is why my wife, Gena, and I encourage citizens everywhere to do their own research on geo-engineering and then
write their government representatives to demand action. We also encourage the support of the Legal Alliance of pro-bono
lawyers now amassed as a united front to fight the geo-engineering government cover-up in court.

To read or learn more immediately, I highly recommend the work and website of Dane
Wigington. GeoEngineeringWatch.org is loaded with great research on the many facets of climate intervention.

Whereabouts Of Julian Assange Remain A Mystery + Want To Know Julian Assanges


Endgame? He Told You A Decade Ago
December 1 2016 | From: Infowars / Wired / Various

Speculation is exploding about the fate of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, whos been out of
public spotlight since Hillary Clinton lost the U.S. presidential election.
Wikileaks has responded by asking people to stop requesting proof of life, and that Ecuadorian President Rafael
Correa is to blame for controlling Assanges movement.
Want To Know Julian Assanges Endgame? He Told You A Decade Ago
[Archical but relevant] Amid a seemingly incessant deluge of leaks and hacks, Washington, DC
staffers have learned to imagine how even the most benign email would look a week later on the
homepage of a secret-spilling outfit like WikiLeaks or DCLeaks.
In many cases, theyve stopped emailing altogether, deleted accounts, and reconsidered dumbphones. Julian
Assange - or at least, a ten-years-younger and more innocent Assange - would say hes already won.

After another week of Clinton-related emails roiling this election, the political world has been left to scrub their inboxes,
watch their private correspondences be picked over in public, and psychoanalyze WikiLeaks inscrutable founder.

Once theyre done sterilizing their online lives, they might want to turn to an essay Assange wrote ten years ago, laying out
the endgame of his leaking strategy long before he became one of the most controversial figures on the Internet.

In Conspiracy as Governance, which Assange posted to his blog in December 2006, the leader of then-new WikiLeaks
describes what he considered to be the most effective way to attack a conspiracy - including, as he puts it, that particular
form of conspiracy known as a political party.

Consider what would happen if one of these parties gave up their mobile phones, fax and email correspondence -
let alone the computer systems which manage their [subscribers], donors, budgets, polling, call centres and direct
mail campaigns. They would immediately fall into an organisational stupor and lose to the other.

And how to induce that organisational stupor? Foment the fear that any correspondence could leak at any time.

The more secretive or unjust an organization is, the more leaks induce fear and paranoia in its leadership and
planning coterie.

This must result in minimization of efficient internal communications mechanisms (an increase in cognitive secrecy
tax) and consequent system-wide cognitive decline resulting in decreased ability to hold onto power as the
environment demands adaptation.

WikiLeaks would publish its first leak the same month as that blog post, a communication from a Somalian Islamic cleric
calling for political assassinations.

Three years later itd put out the Pentagon and State Department leaks provided by Chelsea Manning, and six years after
that, leaked emails from the Democratic National Committee and Clinton advisor John Podesta would lead to the ousting of
DNC Chairman Debbie Wasserman Schultz and shake Hillary Clintons campaign.

The last decade has shown just how prescient Assange was. Take, for example, the Russian hackers who published private
files from the World Anti-Doping Agency after Russias athletes got banned from the Olympics for doping.

Now a group like WADA has to take everything they say to every person into account. They have to think, this could
leak, says Dave Aitel, a former NSA staffer and founder of the security firm Immunity who focuses on cyberwar and
information warfare. The idea is, If we can prevent them from having secrets, they have to operate very differently.'

That move comes straight from Assange.

It was a crappy, annoying manifesto, Aitel says. And it was ahead of its time by many years.

- Dave Aitel, Former NSA analyst

A spokesperson for WikiLeaks says Assanges essay was a thought experiment that the organization still believes to be
true. Organizations have two choices:

1. reduce their levels of abuse or dishonesty or

2. pay a heavy secrecy tax in order to engage in inefficient but secretive processes, the spokesperson writes.
As organizations are usually in some form of competitive equilibrium this means that, in the face of WikiLeaks,
organizations that are honest will, on average, grow, while those that are dishonest and unjust will decline.
The more secretive or unjust an organization is, the more leaks induce fear and paranoia in its leadership and
planning coterie."

- Julian Assange, writing in 2006

Of course, Assanges claim that a political party leaks in direct proportion to its dishonesty looks almost laughable after the
last several months.

WikiLeaks has published leaks exclusively damaging to Clinton and the Democratic Party, while publishing nothing from
Donald Trump or his campaign. (Trump has, of course, faced the leaks of his 1995 tax returns and a damning video where
he brags about sexual assault.

But mainstream newspapers published both, and neither came from the sort of internal communications Assange wrote
about. Trump himself also famously doesnt use email, as good a security measure as anyone could hope for.)

In fact, the Department of Homeland Security and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence have both said that
recent WikiLeaks releases originated with Russian state-sponsored hackers seeking to influence US electoral politics.

Comment: Horse shit. The Cabal were so hard up for a cover story that they had a tantrum and tried to blame the
Russians. Fucking pathetic. These people are inept, worthless scum.
Assanges essay doesnt account for the possibility that a government might exploit or collude with a leak platform like
WikiLeaks. (WikiLeaks spokesperson denied that there has been any official claim that any documents published by
WikiLeaks have come from a state actor, somehow ignoring last weeks DHS and ODNI announcement.)

The notion in Assanges essay that only corrupt conspiracies keep secrets is one that Clinton herself has argued against -
ironically, something we know because she said it in a speech whose partial transcript WikiLeaks leaked last Friday.

Speaking to the National Multi-Housing Council in 2013, Clinton cited how President Lincoln secretly promised jobs to lame
duck Congressmen of the opposing political party if they agreed to vote for the 13th Amendment, which ended slavery.

If everybodys watching all of the backroom discussions and the deals, you know, then people get a little nervous, to say
the least, she said. So, you need both a public and a private position.

But the other point Assange makes - the secrecy tax that organizations pay when they try to avoid leaks - rings true. Any
organization that has tried to encrypt all its communications, delete them, or throttle, quarantine, and compartmentalize them
in the name of secrecy knows the toll that paranoia takes.

An authoritarian conspiracy that cannot think efficiently cannot act to preserve itself against the opponents it
induces...

When we look at a conspiracy as an organic whole, we can see a system of interacting organs, a body with
arteries and veins whose blood may be thickened and slowed till it falls, unable to sufficiently comprehend and
control the forces in its environment.

Let that be a warning to the Democratic Party and any other organization with secrets to keep. If the leaks dont kill you, the
fear of them just might.

The following articles are a cross-section of developments over recent weeks and months, some of which may
provide clues as to what has led to this strange situation:
Why Did WikiLeaks Tweet a Picture of Gavin MacFadyen?

Ecuador Admits They Silenced Assange Because Clinton Leaks Were Interfering With US Election

Wikileaks Warns It Is Launching "Phase Three" Of Its Election Coverage

Julian Assange Gets Sweet Revenge After Hillary Cuts His Internet

Wikileaks Appears To Have Just Released Its First Insurance File, Fully Open And Unencrypted

Assange: WikiLeaks Will Publish Docs on Elections, Oil, War & Google, Every Week for Next 10 Weeks

Wikileaks: Hillary Clinton Proposed Killing Assange With Drone Strike

Assange ready to surrender to US

Renowned lawyer who represented Julian Assange died after being struck by train in West Hampstead

WikiLeaks Founder Just Revealed Why Sanders Really Dropped Out

Under Intense Pressure to Silence Wikileaks, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Proposed Drone Strike on Assange

Wikileaks Cancels Highly Anticipated Tuesday Announcement Due to Security Concerns

Wikileaks Email Exposes Podesta Using Soviet Assassination Term Just Prior to Justice Scalias Death

FBI Found "Tens Of Thousands Of Emails" Belonging To Huma Abedin On Weiner's Laptop

Hillary Just Got Politically Assassinated: Wikileaks Just Released Her Full Isis Donor List With Names!

Shocking: Top 100 Bombshell WikiLeak Emails Revealed So Far

Google Is Funding A Ministry Of Truth With Corporate Media Outlets Known For
Deadly Deception + Heres Why Fake News Sites Are Dangerous
December 1 2016 | From: TheFreeThoughtProject / JonRappoport

While establishment Democrats trumpet all sorts of excuses for Hillarys loss, few are willing to
admit that she represented the alliance of bureaucratic corruption and corporate greed people are
sick of.
The most insidious excuse being pushed by the establishment Left (consisting of party leaders and much of the
mainstream media) is the so-called fake news trope.

Related: The Western War On Truth

No one denies that publishing articles about made-up events, and presenting that as real news, is a terrible thing, which
unfortunately gets shared without people taking the responsibility of verifying information.

But the censorship crusade being carried out by MSM is about more than actual fake news.

It is a vehicle for silencing alternative media and dissenting voices that represent a threat to the narrative. The
target is not just the alt-right but alternative news and views from a range of political categories.

MSM outlets such as NYMag, LA Times and the Independent immediately picked up on a list of False, Misleading,
Clickbait-y, and/or Satirical News Sources produced by a university professor. Without providing reasoning or examples to
back up the claim that this list should be taken seriously, it was held up as a blacklist to be avoided.

That may have been only the first salvo, as far greater plans are in the works, represented by something called the First
Draft Coalition.
Related: NZ's Media Already Very Concentrated, Lacks Diversity

Funded by Google News Lab, this coalition of over thirty major news and technology organisations aims to tackle issues
of trust and truth in reporting information that emerges online. Notable members include the New York Times, Washington
Post, CNN and BBC.

They have anointed themselves as a sort of Ministry of Truth, as Robert Parry describes in his examination of the fake
news subject:

It has also led to some very real harassment of the people caught up in the theory, including the owner of the
Comet Ping Pong pizzeria in the District, James Alefantis.

Alefantis has received hundreds of death threats over the past couple of weeks, he told the New York Times this
week, after Pizzagate enthusiasts decided that his restaurant was the secret headquarters of a child sex-trafficking
ring run by Hillary Clinton and members of her inner circle."

However, these self-appointed deciders have their own dubious history with accuracy in journalism.

We recently reported on five campaigns of deception that mainstream media have happily marched along with, resulting in
the suffering of millions and the whitewashing of American foreign policy. The New York Times and Washington Post were
particularly irresponsible with their reporting of falsities on nuclear weapons and WMD in Iraq.

They have long pushed the narrative for the foreign policy establishment, from ignoring the Iran-Contra scandal to providing
cover for U.S. machinations in Syria.
Related: The Major Purveyor of Fake News is the CIA-Corporate Complex

CNN silenced their own reporter who found evidence of human rights abuses being carried out in Bahrain, a Middle East
dictatorship that also happens to host the U.S. Navy Fifth Fleet.

But the irony of the First Draft Coalition goes even further. One of the founders of First Draft Coalition a citizen journalism
site called Bellingcat has published high-profile stories with false information, and, according to Parry, has a close
association with NATO through the Atlantic Council.

Despite Bellingcats checkered record and its conflicts of interest through the Atlantic Council, major Western
news outlets, including the Times and Post, have embraced Bellingcat, apparently because its articles always
seem to mesh neatly with U.S. and European propaganda on Syria and Ukraine.

Two of Bellingcats (or its founder Eliot Higginss) biggest errors were misplacing the firing location of the
suspected Syrian rocket carrying sarin gas on Aug. 21, 2013, and directing an Australian news crew to the wrong
site for the so-called getaway Buk video after the July 17, 2014 shoot-down of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17.

But like many news outlets that support establishment group thinks, Bellingcat wins widespread praise and
official endorsements, such as from the international MH-17 investigation that was largely controlled by Ukraines
unsavory intelligence agency, the SBU and that accepted Bellingcats dubious MH-17 evidence blaming the
Russians.

Parry believes that if this Ministry of Truth called the First Draft Coalition existed during Iran-Contra and the Iraq invasion,
the voices of dissent that ultimately exposed government and MSM lies would have been quashed.

U.S. intervention in Syria and the nurturing of the Salafist sect that went on to become ISIS - as well as the McCarthyist
aggression against Russia - all could not have happened without the support of Washington think-tanks and MSM
cheerleaders toeing the government line.
Related: Washington Post Disgracefully Promotes a McCarthyite Blacklist From a New, Hidden, and Very Shady
Group

So it comes back around to the problem of who gets to decide what constitutes fake news?

How can establishment outlets - who have purveyed a fake narrative of U.S. foreign policy that hides a truly
subversive, hegemonic and war-making nature - be trusted to tell us what is real?

There are undoubtedly great journalists among the members of the First Draft Coalition, who brave dangerous parts of the
world and the gauntlet of political retribution to bring us valuable information. Its the overarching agenda of establishment
media, acting as Praetorian Guard for Washingtons political elite, that has become so obvious and so troubling.

While its undeniable that some false or dubious stories get pushed during the heat of a political campaign and in
wartime and journalists have a role in fact-checking as best they can there is potentially a greater danger when
media insiders arrogate to themselves the power to dismiss contrary evidence as unacceptable, especially given
their own history of publishing stories that turned out to be dubious if not entirely false.

Its even more dangerous when these self-appointed arbiters of truth combine forces with powerful Internet search
engines and social media companies to essentially silence dissenting opinions and contrary facts by making them
very difficult for the public to locate.

Alternative media represent a choice for people who are fed up with the system, and it is the peoples responsibility to
research the news in order to achieve an accurate perspective on events.

It is not up to a self-proclaimed Ministry of Truth laden with the same corrupt baggage that acted as proverbial bouy for
Hillary Clinton during the campaign to dictate what is right and wrong.
Heres Why Fake News Sites Are Dangerous
Were not supposed to believe these fake news Individuals created their news operations on
their own.

Were not supposed to believe each individual had a vision of what the news is supposed to be and followed that
vision forward with great energy.

Related: 5 Times Corporate Media Got Caught Publishing Fake News Causing the Death & Suffering of Millions
Here is your daily mantra: Narrow the range of thought, narrow the range of thought.

Exposing elites who run the world?

Exposing pedophile networks?

Documenting the lies and fabrications of major media?

Laying bare the manipulations of Globalists?

Revealing the crimes of both major political parties in America?

Uncovering the spread of pharmaceutical devastation?

Tracking the ruthless ops of major corporations?

Yes, many so-called fake news sites do all this and much more - but something else is also going on.

Many of these sites were launched and are spearheaded by ONE man or woman.

No person outside the mainstream is supposed to be so emboldened by his/her own point of view and passion.

All points of view belong to a group.

An individual works for what he believes is true? He keeps his own counsel? He forges ahead, despite all opposition? He
may even, when all is said and done, make a profit from his own labors?

Were supposed to oppose these evils, and by the grace of governments and their shadow operators, we will emerge from
the darkness and find our salvation in a New Order of things.

And never - if you happen to disagree with what some independent news site is saying - NEVER entertain the idea
of starting YOUR OWN news operation and building it from the ground up to reflect YOUR OWN vision.
Related: Washington Post claims Natural News is controlled by the Russian government

NEVER. That is individual power, which is the horrible fate that would await you. DOING IT ON YOUR OWN? Avoid it
like the plague.

America was originally built on chipping away at peoples individual creations and tearing them down. Right? How else could
America have succeeded?

It is only by taking away independence in all its forms that we could have arrived at the cusp of this grand triumph
now: One Collectivist World.

If we give all our attention to the six corporations that own big media and deliver their news to us, we will arrive.

Hail, Caesar! Your followers salute you! Let the bands play. March to the tune. No individual ever built anything, no
individual can build anything, no individual ever will build anything.

Search for the media-teat of the State. Find it. And drink from it.

Related: The Fake News Witch Hunt: McCarthys Red Scare Redux

Ah. How rejuvenating.

In summary, independent news-site creators are fakes because theyre real.

Outside the mainstream, on their own, they launched and expanded their operations. Being real outside the mainstream is
fake, because the powers-that-be do not support that model.

Are we clear? I hope so.

You can be fake within the approved model: thats real. But if youre real outside the approved model: thats fake.
Got it?

Dont you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought?

- 1984, George Orwell.

Did Orwell even think to obtain permission from the New York Times before writing that statement?

Is Psychiatry Bullshit? + Fourteen Lies That Our Psychiatry Professors Taught Us In


Medical School
November 26 2016 | From: Sott / GlobalResearch

Some Psychiatrists View The Chemical-Imbalance Theory As A Well-Meaning Lie.


In the current issue of the journal Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry, Australian dissident psychiatrist Niall
McLaren titles his article, "Psychiatry as Bullshit" and makes a case for just that.

Related: The Myth Of Mental Illness: Psychiatry Is A Fraud And It Is All About Control + Opposition Defiant
Disorder - Non-Conformity And Anti-Authoritarianism Now Considered An Illness

The great controversies in psychiatry are no longer about its chemical-imbalance theory of mental illness or its DSM
diagnostic system, both of which have now been declared invalid even by the pillars of the psychiatry
establishment.

In 2011, Ronald Pies, editor-in-chief emeritus of the Psychiatric Times, stated;

In truth, the 'chemical imbalance' notion was always a kind of urban legend - never a theory seriously propounded
by well-informed psychiatrists."

And in 2013, Thomas Insel, then director of the National Institute of Mental Health, offered a harsh rebuke of the
DSM, announcing that because the DSM diagnostic system lacks validity, the: "NIMH will be re-orienting its
research away from DSM categories."

So, the great controversy today has now become just how psychiatry can be most fairly characterized given its record of
being proven wrong about virtually all of its assertions, most notably its classifications of behaviors, theories of "mental
illness" and treatment effectiveness/adverse effects.

Among critics, one of the gentlest characterizations of psychiatry is a "false narrative," the phrase used by investigative
reporter Robert Whitaker (who won the 2010 Investigative Reporters and Editors Book Award for Anatomy of an Epidemic)
to describe the story told by the psychiatrists' guild American Psychiatric Association.

In "Psychiatry as Bullshit," McLaren begins by considering several different categories of "nonscience with scientific
pretensions," such as "pseudoscience" and "scientific fraud."

"Pseudoscience" is commonly defined as a collection of beliefs and practices promulgated as scientific but in reality
mistakenly regarded as being based on scientific method. The NIMH director ultimately rejected the DSM because of its lack
of validity, which is crucial to the scientific method.

In the DSM, psychiatric illnesses are created by an APA committee, 69 percent of whom have financial ties to Big
Pharma.

The criteria for DSM illness are not objective biological ones but non-scientific subjective ones (which is why homosexuality
was a DSM mental illness until the early 1970s).

Besides lack of scientific validity, the DSM lacks scientific reliability, as clinicians routinely disagree on diagnoses because
patients act differently in different circumstances and because of the subjective nature of the criteria.

"Fraud" is a misrepresentation, a deception intended for personal gain, and implies an intention to deceive others
of the truth - or "lying." Drug companies, including those that manufacture psychiatric drugs, have been convicted
of fraud, as have high-profile psychiatrists (as well as other doctors).

Human rights activist and attorney Jim Gottstein offers an argument as to why the APA is a "fraudulent enterprise"; however,
the APA has not been legally convicted of fraud.
To best characterize psychiatry, McLaren considers the category of "bullshit," invoking philosopher Harry Frankfurt's 1986
journal article "On Bullshit" (which became a New York Times bestselling book in 2005).

Defining Bullshit

What is the essence of bullshit? For Frankfurt, "This lack of connection to a concern with truth - this indifference to how
things really are - that I regard as of the essence of bullshit."

Frankfurt devotes a good deal of On Bullshit to differentiating between a liar and a bullshitter. Both the liar and the bullshitter
misrepresent themselves, representing themselves as attempting to be honest and truthful. But there is a difference
between the liar and the bullshitter.

The liar knows the truth, and the liar's goal is to conceal it.

The goal of bullshitters is not necessarily to lie about the truth but to persuade their audience of a specific
impression so as to advance their agenda. So, bullshitters are committed to neither truths nor untruths,
uncommitted to neither facts nor fiction. It's actually not in bullshitters' interest to know what is true and what is
false, as that knowledge can hinder their capacity to bullshit.

Frankfurt tells us that liar the hides that he or she is "attempting to lead us away from a correct apprehension of reality." In
contrast, the bullshitter hides that "the truth-values of his statements are of no central interest to him."

Are Psychiatrists Bullshitters?

Recall establishment psychiatrist Pies' assertion:


In truth, the 'chemical imbalance' notion was always a kind of urban legend - never a theory seriously propounded
by well-informed psychiatrists."

What Pies omits is the reality that the vast majority of psychiatrists have been promulgating this theory. Were they
liars or simply not well-informed? And if not well-informed, were they purposely not well-informed?

If one wants to bullshit oneself and the general public that psychiatry is a genuinely scientific medical specialty, there's a
great incentive to be unconcerned with the truth or falseness of the chemical imbalance theory of depression.

Bullshitters immediately recognize how powerful this chemical imbalance notion is in gaining prestige for their profession
and themselves as well as making their job both more lucrative and easier, increasing patient volume by turning virtually all
patient visits into quick prescribing ones.

Prior to the chemical imbalance bullshit campaign, most Americans were reluctant to take antidepressants - or to
give them to their children.

Related: Big Pharma Caught Manipulating Antidepressant Drug Trials Putting Teenagers in Grave Danger

But the idea that depression is caused by a chemical imbalance that can be corrected with Prozac, Paxil, Zoloft and
selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants sounded like taking insulin for diabetes.

Correcting a chemical imbalance seemed like a reasonable thing to do, and so the use of SSRI antidepressants
skyrocketed.

In 2012, National Public Radio correspondent Alix Spiegel began her piece about the disproven chemical imbalance theory
with the following personal story about being prescribed Prozac when she was a depressed teenager:

My parents took me to a psychiatrist at Johns Hopkins Hospital. She did an evaluation and then told me this story:
"The problem with you," she explained, "is that you have a chemical imbalance. It's biological, just like diabetes,
but it's in your brain.

This chemical in your brain called serotonin is too, too low. There's not enough of it, and that's what's causing the
chemical imbalance. We need to give you medication to correct that." Then she handed my mother a prescription
for Prozac. "

Related: 7 Facts About Depression That Will Blow You Away

When Spiegel discovered that the chemical imbalance theory was untrue, she sought to discover why this truth had been
covered up, and so she interviewed researchers who knew the truth.

Alan Frazer, professor of pharmacology and psychiatry and chairman of the pharmacology department at the University of
Texas Health Sciences Center, told Spiegel that by framing depression as a deficiency - something that needed to be
returned to normal - patients felt more comfortable taking antidepressants.

Frazer stated;

If there was this biological reason for them being depressed, some deficiency that the drug was correcting, then
taking a drug was OK."

For Frazer, the story that depressed people have a chemical imbalance enabled many people to come out of the closet
about being depressed.

Frazer's rationale reminds us of Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky's book Manufacturing Consent, the title deriving from
presidential adviser and journalist Walter Lippmann's phrase "the manufacture of consent" - a necessity for Lippmann, who
believed that the general public is incompetent in discerning what's truly best for them, and so their opinion must be molded
by a benevolent elite who does know what's best for them.
There are some psychiatrists who view the chemical imbalance theory as a well-meaning lie by a benevolent elite to ensure
resistant patients do what is best for them, but my experience is that there are actually extremely few such "well-meaning
liars." Most simply don't know the truth because they have put little effort in discerning it.

I believe McLaren is correct in concluding that the vast majority of psychiatrists are bullshitters, uncommitted to either facts
or fiction. Most psychiatrists would certainly have been happy if the chemical-imbalance theory was true but obviously have
not needed it to be true in order to promulgate it.

For truth seekers, the falseness of the chemical imbalance theory has been easily available, but most psychiatrists
have not been truth seekers.

It is not in the bullshitters' interest to know what is true and what is false, as that knowledge of what is a fact and what is
fiction hinders the capacity to use any and all powerful persuasion. Simply put, a commitment to the truth hinders the
capacity to bullshit.

About the Author

Bruce E. Levine is a practicing clinical psychologist. His latest book is Get Up, Stand Up: Uniting Populists, Energizing the
Defeated, and Battling the Corporate Elite.

Psychotropic Drugs, Are They Safe?


Fourteen Lies That Our Psychiatry Professors Taught Us In Medical School.

Myth # 1:

The FDA (US Food and Drug Administration) tests all new psychiatric drugs

False. Actually the FDA only reviews studies that were designed, administered, secretly performed and paid for by the
multinational profit-driven drug companies.

The studies are frequently farmed out by the pharmaceutical companies by well-paid research firms, in whose interest it is to
find positive results for their corporate employers. Unsurprisingly, such research policies virtually guarantee fraudulent
results.

Myth # 2:

FDA approval means that a psychotropic drug is effective long-term

False. Actually, FDA approval doesnt even mean that psychiatric drugs have been proven to be safe either short-
term or long-term! The notion that FDA approval means that a psych drug has been proven to be effective is also a false
one, for most such drugs are never tested prior to marketing for longer than a few months (and most psych patients take
their drugs for years).

The pharmaceutical industry pays many psychiatric researchers often academic psychiatrists (with east access to
compliant, chronic, already drugged-up patients) who have financial or professional conflicts of interest some of them even
sitting on FDA advisory committees who attempt to fast track psych drugs through the approval process.
For each new drug application, the FDA only receives 1 or 2 of the best studies (out of many) that purport to show short-
term effectiveness. The negative studies are shelved and not revealed to the FDA. In the case of the SSRI drugs, animal lab
studies typically lasted only hours, days or weeks and the human clinical studies only lasted, on average, 4- 6 weeks, far too
short to draw any valid conclusions about long-term effectiveness or safety!

Hence the FDA, prescribing physicians and patient-victims should not have been surprised by the resulting
epidemic of SSRI drug-induced adverse reactions that are silently plaguing the people.

Indeed, many SSRI trials have shown that those drugs are barely more effective than placebo (albeit statistically significant!)
with unaffordable economic costs and serious health risks, some of which are life-threatening and known to be capable of
causing brain damage.

Myth # 3:

FDA approval means that a psychotropic drug is safe long-term

False. Actually, the SSRIs and the anti-psychotic drugs are usually tested in human trials for only a couple of months
before being granted marketing approval by the FDA. And the drug companies are only required to report 1 or 2 studies
(even if many other studies on the same drug showed negative, even disastrous, results).

Drug companies obviously prefer that the black box and fine print warnings associated with their drugs are ignored by both
consumers and prescribers. One only has to note how small the print is on the commercials.
Related: Key Factors To Overcoming Depression Without Drugs

In our fast-paced shop-until-you-drop consumer society, we super-busy prescribing physicians and physician
assistants have never been fully aware of the multitude of dangerous, potentially fatal adverse psych drug effects
that include addiction, mania, psychosis, suicidality, worsening depression, worsening anxiety, insomnia,
akathisia, brain damage, dementia, homicidality, violence, etc, etc.

But when was the last time anybody heard the FDA or Big Pharma apologize for the damage they did in the past?

And when was the last time there were significant punishments (other than writs slaps and chump change multimillion
dollar fines) or prison time for the CEOs of the guilty multibillion dollar drug companies?

Myth # 4:

Mental illnesses are caused by brain chemistry imbalances

False. In actuality, brain chemical/neurotransmitter imbalances have never been proven to exist (except for cases of
neurotransmitter depletions caused by psych drugs) despite vigorous examinations of lab animal or autopsied human brains
and brain slices by neuroscientist s who were employed by well-funded drug companies.

Knowing that there are over 100 known neurotransmitter systems in the human brain, proposing a theoretical chemical
imbalance is laughable and flies in the face of science.
Related: Low-Serotonin Depression Theory Challenged

Not only that, but if there was an imbalance between any two of the 100 potential systems (impossible to prove), a drug
that has never been tested on more than a handful of them could never be expected to re-balance it!

Such simplistic theories have been perpetrated by Big Pharma upon a gullible public and a gullible psychiatric
industry because corporations that want to sell the public on their unnecessary products know that they have to
resort to 20 second sound bite-type propaganda to convince patients and prescribing practitioners why they
should be taking or prescribing synthetic, brain-altering drugs that havent been adequately tested.

Myth # 5:

Antidepressant drugs work like insulin for diabetics

False. This laughingly simplistic and very anti-scientific explanation for the use of dangerous and addictive synthetic
drugs is patently absurd and physicians and patients who believe it should be ashamed of themselves for falling for it.

There is such a thing as an insulin deficiency (but only in type 1 diabetes) but there is no such thing as a Prozac deficiency.

SSRIs (so-called Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors an intentional mis-representation because those drugs
are NOT selective!) do not raise total brain serotonin.

Rather, SSRIs actually deplete serotonin long-term while only goosing serotonin release at the synapse level while at the
same time interfere with the storage, reuse and re-cycling of serotonin (by its serotonin reuptake inhibition function).
(Parenthetically, the distorted illogic of the insulin/diabetes comparison above could legitimately be made in the case of the
amino acid brain nutrient tryptophan, which is the precursor molecule of the important natural neurotransmitter serotonin.

If a serotonin deficiency or imbalance could be proven, the only logical treatment approach would be to supplement the
diet with the serotonin precursor tryptophan rather than inflict upon the brain a brain-altering synthetic chemical that actually
depletes serotonin long-term!

Myth # 6:

SSRI discontinuation syndromes are different than withdrawal syndromes

False. The SSRI antidepressant drugs are indeed dependency-inducing/addictive and the neurological and psychological
symptoms that occur when these drugs are stopped or tapered down are not relapses into a previous mental disorder -
as has been commonly asserted - but are actually new drug withdrawal symptoms that are different from those that
prompted the original diagnosis

The term discontinuation syndrome is part of a cunningly-designed conspiracy that was plotted in secret by
members of the psychopharmaceutical industryin order to deceive physicians into thinking that these drugs are
not addictive.
Related: Dr. Kelly Brogan's Takedown Of Big Pharma's SSRI Anti-Depressant Drug Lies Hits Bestseller Lists

The deception has been shamelessly promoted to distract attention from the proven fact that most psych drugs are
dependency-inducing and are therefore likely to cause discontinuation/withdrawal symptoms when they are stopped.

The drug industry knows that most people do not want to swallow dependency-inducing drugs that are likely to cause
painful, even lethal withdrawal symptoms when they cut down the dose of the drug.

Myth # 7:

Ritalin is safe for children (or adults)

False. In actuality, methylphenidate (= Ritalin, Concerta, Daytrana, Metadate and Methylin; aka kiddie cocaine), a
dopamine reuptake inhibitor drug, works exactly like cocaine on dopamine synapses, except that orally-dosed
methylphenidate reaches the brain more slowly than snortable or smoked cocaine does.
Related: Nutrition And Mental Health + ADHD Is A Fabricated Disease, Says Reputed Neurologist

Therefore the oral form has less of an orgasmic high than cocaine.

Cocaine addicts actually prefer Ritalin if they can get it in a relatively pure powder form.

When snorted, the synthetic Ritalin (as opposed to the naturally-occurring, and therefore more easily metabolically-
degraded cocaine) has the same onset of action but, predictably, has a longer lasting high and is thus preferred among
addicted individuals.

The molecular structures of Ritalin and cocaine both have amphetamine base structures with ring-shaped side
chains which, when examined side by side, are remarkably similar. The dopamine synaptic organelles in the brain (and
heart, blood vessels, lungs and guts) are unlikely to sense any difference between the two drugs.

Myth # 8:

Psychoactive drugs are totally safe for humans

False. See Myth # 3 above. Actually all five classes of psychotropic drugs have, with long-term use, been found to be
neurotoxic (ie, known to destroy or otherwise alter the physiology, chemistry, anatomy and viability of vital energy-producing
mitochondria in every brain cell and nerve). They are therefore all capable of contributing to dementia when used long-term.
Related: The Shocking Truth About Antidepressant Drug Studies + Peter Breggin MD: How Do Psychiatric Drugs
Really Work?

Any synthetic chemical that is capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier into the brain can alter and disable the brain.
Synthetic chemical drugs are NOT capable of healing brain dysfunction, curing malnutrition or reversing brain damage.

Rather than curing anything, psychiatric drugs are only capable of masking symptoms while the abnormal emotional,
neurological or malnutritional processes that mimic mental illnesses continue unabated.

Myth # 9:

Mental illnesses have no known cause

False. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM, published by the American Psychiatric Association, is pejoratively
called the psychiatric bible and billing book for psychiatrists.

Despite its name, it actually has no statistics in it, and, of the 374 psychiatric diagnoses in the DSM-IV (there is now
a 5th edition) there seem to be only two that emphasize known root causes.

Those two diagnoses are Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Acute Stress Disorder. The DSM-V has been roundly
condemned as being just another book that laughingly pathologizes a few more normal human emotions and behaviors.

In my decade of work as an independent holistic mental health care practitioner, I was virtually always able to detect many
of the multiple root causes and contributing factors that easily explained the signs, symptoms and behaviors that had
resulted in a perplexing number of false diagnoses of mental illness of unknown origin.

Many of my patients had been made worse by being hastily diagnosed, hastily drugged, bullied, demeaned, malnourished,
incarcerated, electroshocked (often against their wills and/or without fully informed consent).

My patients had been frequently rendered unemployable or even permanently disabled as a result all because temporary,
potentially reversible, and therefore emotional stressors had not been recognized at the onset.
Because of the reliance on drugs, many of my patients had been made incurable by not having been referred to
compassionate practitioners who practiced high quality, non-drug-based, potentially curable psychotherapy.

The root causes of my patients understandable emotional distress were typically multiple, although sometimes a
single trauma, such as a rape, violent assault or a psychological trauma in the military would cause an otherwise
normally-developing individual to decompensate.

But the vast majority of my patients had experienced easily identifiable chronic sexual, physical, psychological, emotional
and/or spiritual traumas as root causes often accompanied by hopelessness, sleep deprivation, serious emotional or
physical neglect and brain nutrient deficiencies as well.

The only way that I could obtain this critically important information was through the use of thorough, compassionate (and,
unfortunately, time-consuming) investigation into the patients complete history, starting with prenatal, maternal, infant and
childhood exposures to toxins (including vaccines) and continuing into the vitally important adolescent medical history (all
periods when the patients brain was rapidly developing).
My clinical experience proved to me that if enough high quality time was spent with the patient and if enough hard work was
exerted looking for root causes, the patients predicament could usually be clarified and the erroneous past labels (of
mental illnesses of unknown origin) could be thrown out.

Such efforts were often tremendously therapeutic for my patients, who up to that time had been made to feel guilty,
ashamed or hopeless by previous therapists.

In my experience, most mental ill health syndromes represented identifiable, albeit serious emotional de-compensation due
to temporarily overwhelming crisis situations linked to traumatic, frightening, torturous, neglectful and soul-destroying life
experiences.

My practice consisted mostly of patients who knew for certain that they were being sickened by months or years of
swallowing one or more brain-altering, addictive prescription drugs that they couldnt get off of by themselves.

I discovered that many of them could have been cured early on in their lives if they only had access and could afford
compassionate psychoeducational psychotherapy, proper brain nutrition and help with addressing issues of deprivation,
parental neglect/abuse, poverty and other destructive psychosocial situations.
Related: Officials Declare Eating Healthy A Mental Disorder

I came to the sobering realization that many of my patients could have been cured years earlier if it hadnt been for the
disabling effects of psychiatric drug regimens, isolation, loneliness, punitive incarcerations, solitary confinement,
discrimination, malnutrition, and/or electroshock.

The neurotoxic and brain-disabling drugs, vaccines and frankenfoods that most of my patients had been given early on had
started them on the road to chronicity and disability.

Myth # 10:

Psychotropic drugs have nothing to do with the huge increase in disabled and unemployable American
psychiatric patients

False. See Myths # 2 and # 3 above. In actuality recent studies have shown that the major cause of permanent disability in
the mentally ill is the long-term, high dosage and/or use of multiple neurotoxic psych drugs any combination of which, as
noted above, has never been adequately tested for safety even in animal labs.
Related: Neuroscientist Shows What Fasting Does To Your Brain & Why Big Pharma Wont Study It

Many commonly-prescribed drugs are fully capable of causing brain-damage long-term, especially the anti-psychotics (aka,
major tranquilizers) like Thorazine, Haldol, Prolixin, Clozapine, Abilify, Clozapine, Fanapt, Geodon, Invega, Risperdal,
Saphris, Seroquel and Zyprexa, all of which can cause brain shrinkage that is commonly seen on the MRI scans of anti-
psychotic drug-treated, so-called schizophrenics commonly pointed out as proof that schizophrenia is an anatomic brain
disorder that causes the brain to shrink! (Incidentally, patients who had been on antipsychotic drugs for whatever reason
have been known to experience withdrawal hallucinations and acute psychotic symptoms even if they had never
experienced such symptoms previously.)

Of course, highly addictive minor tranquilizers like the benzodiazepines (Valium, Ativan, Klonopin, Librium, Tranxene,
Xanax) can cause the same withdrawal syndromes. They are all dangerous and very difficult to withdraw from (withdrawal
results in difficult-to-treat rebound insomnia, panic attacks, and seriously increased anxiety), and, when used long-term, they
can all cause memory loss/dementia, the loss of IQ points and the high likelihood of being mis-diagnosed as Alzheimers
disease (of unknown etiology).

Myth # 11:

So-called bipolar disorder can mysteriously emerge in patients who have been taking stimulating
antidepressants like the SSRIs

False. In actuality, crazy-making behaviors like mania, agitation and aggression are commonly caused by the SSRIs. That
list includes a syndrome called akathisia, a severe, sometimes suicide-inducing internal restlessness like having restless
legs syndrome over ones entire body and brain.

Akathisia was once understood to only occur as a long-term adverse effect of antipsychotic drugs (See Myth # 10). So it was
a shock to many psychiatrists (after Prozac came to market in 1987) to have to admit that SSRIs could also cause that
deadly problem.
Related: Antidepressants Arent Needed Most Of The Time

It has long been my considered opinion that SSRIs should more accurately be called agitation-inducing drugs rather than
anti-depressant drugs.

The important point to make is that SSRI-induced psychosis, mania, agitation, aggression and akathisia is NOT bipolar
disorder nor is it schizophrenia!

Myth # 12:

Antidepressant drugs can prevent suicides

False. In actuality, there is no psychiatric drug that is FDA-approved for the treatment of suicidality because these drugs,
especially the so-called antidepressants, actually INCREASE the incidence of suicidal thinking, suicide attempts and
completed suicides.
Related: The Roots Of Mental Health - Maybe Theyre Not In Our Heads + Rising Rates Of Suicide: Are Pills The
Problem?

Drug companies have spent billions of dollars futilely trying to prove the effectiveness of various psychiatric drugs in suicide
prevention.

Even the most corrupted drug company trials have failed! Indeed what has been discovered is that all the so-called
antidepressants actually increase the incidence of suicidality.

The FDA has required black box warning labels about drug-induced suicidality on all SSRI marketing materials, but that was
only accomplished after over-coming vigorous opposition from the drug-makers and marketers of the offending drugs, who
feared that such truth-telling would hurt their profits (it hasnt).

What can and does avert suicidality, of course, are not drugs, but rather interventions by caring, compassionate and
thorough teams of care-givers that include family, faith communities and friends as well as psychologists, counselors, social
workers, relatives (especially wise grandmas!), and, obviously, the limited involvement of drug prescribers.

Myth # 13:

Americas school shooters and other mass shooters are untreated schizophrenics who should have been taking
psych drugs

False. In actuality, 90% or more of the infamous homicidal and usually suicidal school shooters have already been
under the care of psychiatrists (or other psych drug prescribers) and therefore have typically been taking (or withdrawing
from) one or more psychiatric drugs.

SSRIs (such as Prozac) and psychostimulants (such as Ritalin) have been the most common classes of drugs involved.
Antipsychotics are too sedating, although an angry teen who is withdrawing from antipsychotics could easily become a
school shooter if given access to lethal weapons. (See www.ssristudies.net).

The 10% of school shooters whose drug history is not known, have typically had their medical files sealed by the authorities
probably to protect authorities such as the drug companies and/or the medical professionals who supplied the drugs from
suffering liability or embarrassment.
Important Comment: It should be noted that in most cases such 'False Flag' shooter events, that Mind-Controlled
assets are used in order to carry out events pushing Cabal-driven agenda's such as gun control. In virtually EVERY
case the 'perpetrators' are on multiple prescription drugs for mental health issues.

This is not a comfortable subject but it is one that you will need to confront sooner or later, as the truth will become
common knowledge at some point. Interspersed with the rest of this section are details of the reality which hides
behind the prescription drugs and their side effects -

Related: Monarch Mind Control & The MK-Ultra Program

The powerful drug industry and psychiatry lobby, with the willing help of the media that profits from being their handmaidens,
repeatedly show us the photos of the shooters that look like zombies.

They have successfully gotten the viewing public to buy the notion that these adolescent, white male school
shooters were mentally ill rather than under the influence of their crazy-making, brain-altering drugs or going
through withdrawal.

Contrary to the claims of a recent 60 Minutes program segment about untreated schizophrenics being responsible for half
of the mass shootings in America, the four mentioned in the segment were, in fact, almost certainly being already under the
treatment with psych drugs prior to the massacres by psychiatrists who obviously are being protected from public
identification and/or interrogation by the authorities as accomplices to the crimes or witnesses.
Related: CIA MKULTRA: They Intended To Use Drugs For Everything

Because of this secrecy, the public is being kept in the dark about exactly what crazy-making, homicidality-
inducing psychotropic drugs could have been involved.

The names of the drugs and the multinational corporations that have falsely marketed them as safe drugs are also being
actively protected from scrutiny, and thus the chance of prevention of future drug-related shootings or suicides is being
squandered.

Such decisions by Americas ruling elites represent public health policy at its worst and is a disservice to past and
future shooting victims and their loved ones.
Related: Confession Of A Human Programmer: Illuminati Mind Control

The four most notorious mass shooters that were highlighted in the aforementioned 60 Minutes segment included the
Virginia Tech shooter, the Tucson shooter, the Aurora shooter and the Sandy Hook shooter whose wild-eyed (drugged-up)
photos have been carefully chosen for their dramatic zombie-look effect, so that most frightened, paranoid Americans are
convinced that it was a crazy schizophrenic, rather than a victim of psychoactive, brain-altering, crazy-making drugs that
may have made him do it.

Parenthetically, it needs to be mentioned that many media outlets profit handsomely from the drug and medical industries.

Therefore those media outlets have an incentive to protect the names of the drugs, the names of the drug
companies, the names of the prescribing MDs and the names of the clinics and hospitals that could, in a truly just
and democratic world, otherwise be linked to the crimes.
Related: Are You A Mind-Controlled CIA Stooge? + The Term Conspiracy Theory Was Invented By The CIA In
Order To Prevent Disbelief Of Official Government Stories

Certainly if a methamphetamine-intoxicated person shot someone, the person who supplied the intoxicating drug would be
considered an accomplice to the crime, just like the bartender who supplied the liquor to someone who later committed a
violent crime would be held accountable.

A double standard obviously exists when it comes to powerful, respected and highly profitable corporations.

A thorough study of the scores of American school shooters, starting with the University of Texas tower shooter in 1966 and
(temporarily) stopping at Sandy Hook, reveals that the overwhelming majority of them (if not all of them) were taking brain-
altering, mesmerizing, impulse-destroying, dont give a damn drugs that had been prescribed to them by well-meaning but
too-busy psychiatrists, family physicians or physician assistants who somehow were unaware of or were misinformed about
the homicidal and suicidal risks to their equally unsuspecting patients (and therefore they had failed to warn the patient
and/or the patients loved ones about the potentially dire consequences).

Related: Censorship Shock: Amazon.com Bans Investigative Book Nobody Died At Sandy Hook Because It
Disagrees With Government Version Of What Happened
Most practitioners who wrote the prescriptions for the mass shooters or for a patient who later suicided while under the
influence of the drug, will probably(and legitimately so) defend themselves against the charge of being an accomplice to
mass murder or suicide by saying that they were ignorant about the dangers of these cavalierly prescribed psych drugs
because they had been deceived by the cunning drug companies that had convinced them of the benign nature of the
drugs.

Myth # 14:

If your patient hears voices it means hes a schizophrenic

False. Auditory hallucinations are known to occur in up to 10% of normal people; and up to 75% of normal people have had
the experience of someone that isnt there calling their name. (www.hearing-voices.org/voices-visions).

Nighttime dreams, nightmares and flashbacks probably have similar origins to daytime visual, auditory and
olfactory hallucinations, but even psychiatrists dont think that they represent mental illnesses.

Indeed, hallucinations are listed in the pharmaceutical literature as a potential side effect or withdrawal symptom of many
drugs, especially psychiatric drugs.

These syndromes are called substance-induced psychotic disorders which are, by definition, neither mental illnesses nor
schizophrenia.

Rather, substance-induced or withdrawal-induced psychotic disorders are temporary and directly caused by the
intoxicating effects of malnutrition or brain-altering drugs such as alcohol, medications, hallucinogenic drugs and
other toxins.

Psychotic symptoms, including hallucinations and delusions, can be caused by substances such as alcohol, marijuana,
hallucinogens, sedatives, hypnotics, and anxiolytics, inhalants, opioids, PCP, and the many of the amphetamine-like drugs
(like Phen-Fen, [fenfluramine]), cocaine, methamphetamine, Ecstasy, and agitation-inducing, psycho-stimulating drugs like
the SSRIs).

Psychotic symptoms can also result from sleep deprivation, sensory deprivation and the withdrawal from certain drugs like
alcohol, sedatives, hypnotics, anxiolytics and especially the many dopamine-suppressing, dependency-inducing, sedating,
and zombifying anti-psychotic drugs.
Examples of other medications that may induce hallucinations and delusions include anesthetics, analgesics, anticholinergic
agents, anticonvulsants, antihistamines, antihypertensive and cardiovascular medications, some antimicrobial medications,
anti-parkinsonian drugs, some chemotherapeutic agents, corticosteroids, some gastrointestinal medications, muscle
relaxants, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, and Antabuse.

The very sobering information revealed above should cause any thinking person, patient, thought-leader or politician to
wonder:

How many otherwise normal or potentially curable people over the last half century of psych drug propaganda
have actually been mis-labeled as mentally ill (and then mis-treated) and sent down the convoluted path of
therapeutic misadventures heading toward oblivion?

In my mental health care practice, I personally treated hundreds of patients who had been given a multitude of confusing
and contradictory mental illness labels, many of which had been one of the new diseases of the month for which there was
a new psych drug of the month that was being heavily marketed on TV.

Many of my patients had simply been victims of unpredictable drug-drug interactions (far too often drug-drug-drug-
drug interactions) or simply adverse reactions to psych drugs which had been erroneously diagnosed as a new
mental illness.

Extrapolating my 1,200 patient experience (in my little isolated section of the nation) to what surely must be happening in
America boggles my mind.

There has been a massive epidemic going on right under our noses that has affected millions of suffering victims
who could have been cured if not for the drugs.

The time to act on this knowledge is long overdue.


In The Wake Of Trumps Historic Victory The 4th Estate Is Rightfully Burning To The
Ground
November 26 2016 | From: TheGatewayPundit / Infowars

Thanks to Wikileaks we know at least 65 MSM Reporters Were Meeting with and/or Coordinating
Offline with Top Hillary Advisors.

The info-fascists in the political and corporate media classes have a new meme in their war on information they
dont like: the scourge of so called fake news.

Related: Proof Mainstream Media Publishes Fake News

Even President Obama (who will never pass up a microphone except to avoid quelling violent anti Trump-nuts) is railing
about the fake problem of fake news. But watch out. Youll notice Obama and his media enablers conveniently add hyper-
partisan sites to their list of declared enemies of the people.

Facebooks Mark Zuckerberg just announced to his liberal masters that he will go after fake news and cites as an
example some outrageous story printed on an unheard of clickbait site. But his real target, as it is for corporate
media and liberal politicians, are sites such as the one you are on now.

The fact is the media and its losers on the campaign trail are desperately trying to avoid self reflection after being exposed
as partisan hacks themselves throughout the campaign. Its a reality confirmed on election night as newscasters and
experts collectively acted as if their puppies were being summarily executed in front of their eyes.
Related: After Election Loss Hillary Clinton Looks Like Death

But the only true death was that of their credibility. With no more electronic wall maps to desperately poke on in hopes
of finding more Hillary votes, they have nowhere to turn in the aftermath except to invent another enemy besides
Republicans, Trump and good ideas.

Youll notice the hyper partisan category only includes such conservative sites such as Breitbart, the Blaze and The
Gateway Pundit. There is no mention of Daily Kos, Media Matters, or Buzzfeed. Nor is there any mention of CNBC, CNN or
ABC which are staffed on air by hyper partisans and former employees of the Clintons.

Thats mainly because the Conservative sites were wickedly effective in balancing the left wing moonbattery which rotted
seconds after being printed.

It is true that bias is seen in what is reported and stated. But most media bias comes in the form of what is NOT
reported and NOT stated.

The sites currently targeted told the truths the corporate mainstream media was unwilling to tell because of their support of
one ideology and one candidate.

And, more importantly, these sites relegated corporate media into nothing but a bunch of third world government -speak
mimics. And much like it was with the government ghouls so it was with the liberal media hacks both open and closeted:
Smarter Americans flushed them on Election Day.
Related: Mainstream Media Corruption

It should be noted the Conservative sites being targeted in his fake news jihad make no mystery of where they stand
politically. Its why Americans seem to trust them MORE not less, as they dont have to sit there and decipher the views of
who is behind the information.

But Mainstream media pretends to be objective when its not. Its consumers know better and feel lied to en masse.

The good (and accurate) news is that there is no hope for the info fascists. There is no recovery. The liberal
ayatollahs will never win as they attempt to stomp on free speech and sites that show them as clothesless emperors.

And their #NeverTrump partners typing away in usual suspect NRO circles have been exposed as well. Having been
humiliated after joining forces with Libs to attack the outsider and get Hillary Clinton elected , their operations are now the
dumpster fires that they so arrogantly called the Trump movement.

How Trump Destroyed Mainstream Media Forever

Related: How Trump Destroyed Mainstream Media Forever

Gallup shows only a third of Americans trust mainstream media. That was a month before the election.

Once the advertisers start to shed them the revolution will be complete.

The fourth estate is rightfully burning to the ground. This election was a huge victory for non-traditional media.

It truly reminded the right people of our never ending - and never to be abridged - freedom to discern.
Related: New York Times publisher vows to 'rededicate' paper to reporting honestly

Obama Declares War On Infowars, Breitbart

With the intention to censor independent media, President Obama is now spearheading the fervent
assault on so-called fake news.

This war on fake news began after anti-Trump world leaders, heads of social media platforms and the
mainstream press realized they lost the presidential election because they no longer had credibility and influence
over the US population.

Related: Who is Behind Fake News? Mainstream Media Use Fake Videos and Images

Obama made clear his desire to limit news reports by populist media at a press conference in Lima, Peru, on Sunday where
he also defended the Trans-Pacific Partnership.

If, generally, weve got elections that arent focused on issues and are full of fake news and false information and
distractions, then the issue is not going to be whats happening from the outside; the issue is going to be what are
we doing for ourselves from the inside, he claimed. The good news is thats something that we have control
over.

These assertions come in conjunction with statements he made last week at a press conference in Germany alongside
Chancellor Angela Merkel.

Part of ways changed in politics is social media and how people are receiving information, he said.
Related: Entrenched Western Media Propaganda Accepted As Truth

In a recent interview in the The New Yorker, Obama targeted some of what he likely considers his enemies in the media by
name.

People didnt see me coming. In southern Illinois, in those counties I won, I was at VFWs and fish fries hearing
peoples stories and talking to folks, so that they knew me, he said. They werent getting me through Fox or Rush
Limbaugh or Breitbart or Red State.

But as former congressman Dr. Ron Paul points out, the origin of fake news isnt independent media sites like Infowars and
Breitbart, but rather the establishment media which has hit all-time lows in public trust and ratings.

These are the news sources that told us if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor, Dr. Paul revealed.

They told us that Hillary Clinton had a 98% chance of winning the election.

They tell us in a never-ending loop that The economy is in great shape!

President-elect Donald Trumps campaign was famous for powerful, simple slogans, such as Make America Great Again
and Drain the Swamp, and was bolstered by a massive wave of social media support fueled by stories originating from
alternative media outlets which are now being falsely smeared as fake news by the corporate press.

Related: Ron Paul Reveals Hit List of Alleged Fake News Journalists
Donald Trumps Media Summit Was A "Fucking Firing Squad" + Trump Is "The End"
Of Central Banking As We Know It: Fund Manager
November 24 2016 | From: NewYorkPost / CNBC

Donald Trump scolded media big shots during an off-the-record Trump Tower sitdown on Monday,
sources told The Post.

It was like a fucking firing squad, one source said of the encounter. Trump started with [CNN chief] Jeff Zucker
and said, I hate your network, everyone at CNN is a liar and you should be ashamed, the source said.

The meeting was a total disaster. The TV execs and anchors went in there thinking they would be discussing the
access they would get to the Trump administration, but instead they got a Trump-style dressing-down, the source
added.
A second source confirmed the fireworks.

The meeting took place in a big boardroom and there were about 30 or 40 people, including the big news anchors
from all the networks, the other source said.

Trump kept saying, Were in a room of liars, the deceitful, dishonest media who got it all wrong. He addressed
everyone in the room, calling the media dishonest, deceitful liars. He called out Jeff Zucker by name and said
everyone at CNN was a liar, and CNN was [a] network of liars, the source said.

Trump didnt say [NBC reporter] Katy Tur by name, but talked about an NBC female correspondent who got it
wrong, then he referred to a horrible network correspondent who cried when Hillary lost who hosted a debate -
which was Martha Raddatz, who was also in the room.
The stunned reporters tried to get a word in edgewise to discuss access to a Trump administration.

[CBS Good Morning co-host Gayle] King did not stand up, but asked some question, How do you propose we
the media work with you? Chuck Todd asked some pretty pointed questions.

David Muir asked, How are you going to cope living in DC while your family is in NYC? It was a horrible meeting.

Trump spokeswoman Kellyanne Conway told reporters the gathering went well.

Excellent meetings with the top executives of the major networks, she said during a gaggle in the lobby of Trump
Tower. Pretty unprecedented meeting we put together in two days.

The meeting was off the record, meaning the participants agreed not to talk about the substance of the conversations.

The hour-long session included top execs from network and cable news channels.
Among the attendees were NBCs Deborah Turness, Lester Holt and Chuck Todd; ABCs James Goldston, George
Stephanopoulos, David Muir and Martha Raddatz; CBS Norah ODonnell, John Dickerson, Charlie Rose, Christopher Isham
and King; Fox News Bill Shine, Jack Abernethy, Jay Wallace and Suzanne Scott; MSNBCs Phil Griffin, and CNNs Jeff
Zucker and Erin Burnett.

Arthur Sulzberger, publisher of the New York Times, plans to meet with Trump on Tuesday.

There was no immediate comment from the Trump Team.

Trump Is "The End" Of Central Banking As We Know It: Fund Manager

The surprising election win for Donald Trump is raising questions across a range of policy areas,
with the future role of monetary stimulus and central banking being one of them.
Trump's policies are "about spending money and then printing money, so it's the end of central banking as we
know it since the beginning of the (1980s)," Beat Wittmann, partner and chairman at Porta Advisors, told CNBC on
Monday.

The president-elect wants to provide the economy with a strong fiscal stimulus, promising to invest $1 trillion on
infrastructure and cutting taxes. But, according to several analysts, this strategy is set to increase inflation as well as the
U.S. budget deficit.

A Shock Boost
Janet Yellen

Related: Globalist's Desperation: Janet Yellen & Her Criminal Cohorts

This is a completely inappropriate time to engage in further fiscal stimulus," David Kelly, chief global strategist at
JP Morgan Asset Management, said in a note.

This is because the federal deficit is already rising, growing from 2.5 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) in fiscal 2015
to 3.2 percent of GDP in 2016, and if Trump's fiscal plans are implemented in full, national debt would go up to 105 percent
of GDP by 2026, he added.

Also, given that the U.S. economy is considered as in full employment, "a shock boost to aggregate demand through tax
cuts would likely boost inflation and imports more than domestic production," Kelly said.

If these inflationary pressures materialize, the Federal Reserve could be forced to tighten its policy at a faster pace.

But apart from impacting monetary policy through his economic policies, the president-elect could pave the way for changes
inside the Federal Reserve.

I think she is very political," Trump said in September regarding Janet Yellen, the chair of the Fed.

"And to a certain extent, I think she should be ashamed of herself," he added.

Trump has often criticized the central bank regarding its independence.
Seven Vacancies

According to the Wall Street Journal, Trump could change the formation of the Fed over the next 18 months, during which
seven vacancies will be available in the bank's board of governors.

He might also be willing to work with the GOP-controlled Congress to rewrite the laws governing the Fed's structure and
disclosures, possibly embracing proposals central bank officials have seen as threats to their policy-making independence,
the newspaper reported.

Related: Trump Releases A Video Outlining His Policy Plans For First 100 Days

The Fifth Estate Casts It's Shadow Like A Massive Mothership


November 22 2016 | From: CosmicConvergence

Before Long the Mainstream Media Will be History: BIG MOTHER is watching Big Brother!
The biggest story on planet Earth has gone virtually unnoticed.
It is now common knowledge that whoever controls the media effectively controls the world. Those who do control
the entire planetary realm are only able to do so because they have controlled the mainstream media for as long as
it has been in existence.

Related: Alex Jones: The Media is a Joke, We Have Won

This ironclad control has enabled the World Shadow Government to exert power over the flow of information throughout
every sphere of life for centuries.

In fact, it is the Fourth Estate that holds the true power over the other three. Only by the power of the press is the WSG able
to keep the governments and corporations of the world in check.

A New Era Dawns

Since the advent of the Internet in 1995, the Fifth Estate has been growing by the day. It has taken over 20 years for it to
finally come into its own.

2016 will be long remembered as the year when the Fifth Estate became a force unto itself, so much so that it
profoundly affected the outcome of this years U.S. presidential election.

The campaign season of this election cycle has been the most dynamic and electrifying, surprising and captivating in
American history.

No one has ever seen anything like it. Because the nation still finds itself steeped in the depths of the Great Recession,
there are millions of young adults out of work. Many of them live at home with mom and dad and with very few possessions
except a smartphone or a tablet, a laptop or a desktop.
It is in this environment that the citizen journalist has been born. They are by and large unemployed, bored and angry
that the American Dream has eluded them. Some of them believe that the dream has become an American nightmare and
want to know why.

As they seek answers to this inquiry, they are stumbling upon long-hidden truths that have made them deeply distrust
the mainstream media (MSM)with a vengeance.

"The MSM is comprised not only of all print, video and audio forms of media but also book publishing, movie
production, music production, TV programming, social networks among others."

So heres the current context: While the banksters bankrupted the USA in order to swell the ranks of the jobless and
unemployed, especially among the youth who they intended to fight their unlawful and unprovoked wars of aggression
around the world, something unexpected happened.

The banksters unwittingly created an army of writers and bloggers, e-book authors and essayists, Facebook
posters and Twitter tweeters, YouTube video producers and Instagram photojournalists.
Related: Whoever Controls The Media Controls The World

What else was there to post about this year but the exceedingly dramatic 2016 presidential election, as well as the coming
Second American Revolution. No matter what side of the fence these folks are on, they are busier than if they had a 9 to 5
with the local corporation.

And theyre loving every minute of it because they are learning how the world really works. And, why they really
have no job or even a prospect of a job.

The Rise of the Citizen Journalist

The Internet is the place where many will find their future job. Not the one working for a Fortune 500 corporation; rather, a
real job that will assist with the transformation of post-modern society.

As these young Internet practitioners expand their skill sets, deepen their knowledge base, and broaden their experience,
they have quickly acquired the right stuff to function as a one-person, multi-media platform.

This single development has contributed significantly to the rapid establishment of the Fifth Estate.

As a matter of fact, the now defunct specialty of investigative journalism has seen a massive rebound. These young
journalists have no advertisers to appease and can therefore go after whatever they choose to investigate. Bloggers and
videographers are tearing up the terrain with their incisive blogs and documentaries, respectively.
Related: Google, Corporate Press Launch Attack On Alternative Media

Upstart authors are now writing Pulitzer Prize level reports and series on topics ranging from the Holocaust Industry to the
rigged 2016 U.S. presidential election, from the US Government-coordinated terrorist attacks on 9/11 to the CIA-conducted
assassination of John F. Kennedy.

These citizen journalists all share one thing, and that is a passion for the truth.

They see a world in total disarray and are desperately trying to make some sense of it. In their ardent search for the truth
they unwittingly find themselves becoming world-class journalists. And it is only their pursuit of the truth that has set
them free from the ranks of the unemployed.

Not only do many these folks now have control of their destiny, they are not bound to a corporate agenda like their parents
and grandparents were. Nor are they bound to the conventions of traditional, university taught journalism that keeps their
MSM peers in a tighly controlled box. They are free to think for themselves and to follow the truth wherever it leads them.
Four Horsemen - an award winning independent feature documentary which lifts the lid on how the world really
works.

Such a liberation of genuinely creative energy has created a supernova in the firmament of worldwide media. So
many young journalists have been born into their Internet-based profession that there is now a crowded field of competition
to be dealt with.

This has forced many into various specialty niches which has posed a real threat to the MSM journalists who are now
primarily generalists because of the severe budget cuts over several years throughout that industry.

The Truth Shall Set You Free

The MSM is soon to be overwhelmed by the Alt-Media. Little did the controllers of this planetary realm know that one day -
in the not-too-distant future - they will see a world transformed by the vast number of truth-speakers and fact-writers who
they helped create.

The readership and viewership of the Alt-Media will be filled with billions of souls who are likewise truth-seekers who know
that the MSM is positively not the place to find it.

Truly, this rapidly evolving saga is The Greatest Show on Earth at this very moment in time. It is a global drama of such
epic proportions that soon the entire planetary civilization will have gone through an unparalleled metamorphosis.

For as We the People find our voices and put our pens to paper and take to our keypads to speak truth to power,
so, too, will the peoples of the world.
Related: Who REALLY Controls The Mainstream Media?

When the Alt-Media becomes an echo chamber of truth that replaces the MSM echo chamber of falsehood, the world will
have taken a great leap forward toward the restoration of both personal and national sovereignty. It is only in this global
context that the world community of nations will experience a durable peace and genuine brotherhood.

Then, many things like political integrity and social equality, economic stability and financial security, religious tolerance and
racial respect, civil justice and environmental protection, will all occur naturally and spontaneously.

These are only some of the ways that The Truth Shall Set You Free.

The MOTHERSHIP

There is a very powerful and fast-growing movement afoot that identifies with the meme of the Mothership. One of the
various tag lines of this extraordinary phenomenon, that is quietly manifesting under the radar, is this:
BIG MOTHER is watching Big Brother!

For the uninitiated, the emerging Fifth Estate is BIG MOTHER. The slowly dying Fourth Estate is Big Brother. There is no
question that the tide is gradually changing. And, that the traditional control of information is being altered in profound and
fundamental ways.

Hence, it is only a matter of time - a relatively short period of time - that a veritable sea change will occur on planet Earth.
That moment of highly anticipated change will transpire when the Mothership appears to everyone in all its glory.

Think of it this way: Were a massive Mothership to slowly glide across the sky over New York City and then Washington,
DC and then Miami, Florida, on the very same day, would not the whole order change in a day and a night?!

The Alt-Media is like a Mothership that is slowly approaching Earth as it disseminates forbidden truth and lost information,
deep wisdom and esoteric knowledge across the entire planetary realm.

Then, one day, when nary a soul expects it, looming over the horizon, is this inconceivably enormous Mothership casting a
shadow the size of a solar eclipse. Imagine that out of that Mothership comes darting a multitude of smaller starships, each
one carrying a payload of truth and banner of justice.

More than likely every reader of this post has already contributed to this Project Multi-Media Mothership.

If you have a simple blog or a Facebook page, a website or a Twitter feed, a YouTube channel or an Instagram
account, you have already set loose your starship into the skies of planet Earth via the World Wide Web.

Conclusion

Its time for every truth-seeker to get on board the Mothership. You have been baptized into the Fifth Estate. Please do
not take your responsibilities lightly, you just may be the one who everyone is waiting for to post that vital piece that finally
takes the whole God-forsaken System down, once and for all!
Remember, from this point forward, it is BIG MOTHER who will be watching Big Brother.

Related: The Multi-Media Mothership Platform: Beta Version

Establishment Media Declares War On Their Competition As Fake News


November 18 2016 | From: ActivistPost / Various

The establishment media is dying. This is not a biased view coming from alternative media, it is
a fact borne out by metrics and opinion polls from within the establishment itself.
It was true before the recent election, and is guaranteed to accelerate after their shameless defense of non-reality
which refused to accept any discontent among the American population with standard politics.

Related: Desperate: Establishment Media Says Everything Apart From Itself Is Fake

Now, with egg on their face after the botched election coverage, and a wobbling uncertainty about how they can maintain
multiple threads of a narrative so fundamentally disproven, they appear to be resorting to their nuclear option: a full shut
down of dissent.

Voices within independent media have been chronicling the signposts toward full-on censorship as sites have encountered
everything from excessive copyright infringement accusations, to de-monetization, to the open admission by advertising
giants that certain images would not be tolerated.

However, until now these efforts have appeared random, haphazard, and rife with retractions and restorations of targeted
sites and content. A massive backlash of reader outrage toward these restrictive measures has confirmed that most
consumers dont like the idea of being given boundaries to their intellectual freedom.

That said, there has been a notable increase of hoax websites beginning to populate the information stream. We can attest
that this has been an incredible annoyance as we are bombarded daily with new outrageous claims and rabbit holes that
readers expect us to sift through.

Most times, a cursory glance at the About page or any disclaimers quickly shows where this information is coming from.

Other times, a bit of common sense and discernment about why a site that has just appeared on the scene (check Alexa for
this info) would have EXCLUSIVE BREAKING content under the banner of an apparent local news channel or a name
that is the twisted version of a legitimate news outlet.

But even with those caveats, weve all been taken in at one time or another and have had to retract or update articles as
necessary, or apologize to our e-mail list for sending out a given link. This does jam up the works, but it is the tax we all
must pay if we believe in the free-market of ideas and information.

Were not perfect, but at least we have never been deliberately misleading like CNN and others often have been.
The government recently legalized using propaganda against US citizens. They wielded all of their establishment
media force to sell their lies. And now theyre frustrated that people still prefer the truth as they see it naturally.

As The Verge highlighted in a recent article, "Two-thirds of the worlds internet users live under government censorship."
Although this is roundly decried by establishment media as evidence of declining freedom, this is exactly the path we are
heading toward at the behest of that same media within those areas that have managed to thwart such a reality.

The voices of the corporate media are making a show of calling Facebook to task for evidently not having stringent
enough algorithms to discern legitimate news from deliberate hoax. We are being told that this very likely led to the
election of Trump, and that this has become a major problem in need of a major solution.

The first shots are being fired as we speak. Yesterday we learned that Facebook and Google would take swift action against
fake news by de-monetizing or banning them outright.

"Moving forward, we will restrict ad serving on pages that misrepresent, misstate, or conceal information about the
publisher, the publishers content, or the primary purpose of the web property, a Google spokesperson said in
a statement given to Reuters.

This policy includes fake news sites, the spokesperson confirmed. Google already prevents its AdSense program
from being used by sites that promote violent videos and imagery, pornography, and hate speech.

- Source

This is problematic on a number of levels, not least of which is the vague notion of what constitutes violent imagery and hate
speech. War, of course, is what should first come to mind when thinking of violence. Police shootings and other clashes
might qualify as well, but routinely populate the most mainstream of sources. And one persons hate speech is another
persons dissent.

The second component is that of transparency, where we see claims about any effort to conceal information about the
publisher. Again, very vague, but as any journalist worth their salt knows, it is anonymity which leads to the truth more often
than not, especially when threats against journalists and whistleblowers are demonstrably on the rise.

Today, the mainstream media named us as one of the top fake news sites to avoid. Its quite an honor.

US News (linked above) has published a list of websites that it deems unworthy of support, and is essentially urging to be
de-monitized or banned based on the previous calls to action.

"Here are several fake news sites that have become popular on Facebook, and which should be avoided if youre looking for
the facts:"
- Source

Firstly, the grouping of satire, hoax, and propaganda is troubling, as the definitions of each arent even remotely related to
one another.

Satire is literature and has a tradition dating back thousands of years; it has been recognized as an essential component of
intellectual and political freedom. A deliberate hoax, we can all agree, is lacking integrity, purposely deceptive, and can be
legitimately harmful or dangerous.

Propaganda, though, is aligned with the State; and most commonly is directed and funded by the State. That is a serious
accusation and one that is entirely without merit for this website. It is also an especially ironic and dubious accusation
coming from an outlet called US News.

Yet were proud to be biased for peace, love, and liberty. Anyone against those principles is serving fake news as far as
were concerned.

Related: The Real Reason Why The UN Wants Control Over The Internet

All of this is to say that we are entering dangerous new territory, as the Internet itself is under a new regime with the transfer
to ICANN, an international body. If 2/3 of the globe is under digital dictatorship, what else is the likely outcome from such
international control over information?

However, it is also an exhilarating time to be a part of such mammoth upheaval, where the entrenched apparatus of
the State itself has declared information to be its enemy and to acknowledge that it must do everything in its power
to maintain its tenuous monopoly on the truth.

The unfortunate reality for them is that the truth will always be more efficient and, therefore, simpler to disseminate than the
complexities of lies and true propaganda.

Related Articles:

The Bizarre Media Blackout Of Hacked George Soros Documents

Infowars Announces Fake News Analysis Center

15 Facts About The Imploding U.S. Economy That The Mainstream Media Doesnt Want You To See

This Video Proves The Media is Lying About Trump


Lamestream Media Suddenly Cares About Free Speech!

Trump Campaign Manager Calls on Democrats to Tell Paid Protesters to Cut it Out

Fomenting A National Crisis And Color Revolution: Soros-Funded Anti-Trump


Protesters Riot In Cities Across United States
November 18 2016 | From: Sott / Various

Globalist investor in murder and mayhem George Soros is at it again, funding his MoveOn.org to
organize post-election "sour grapes" protests around the country in response to underdog
Trump's surprising President-elect victory.

Complicit crime partner mainstream media is having a field day deceitfully spinning these top down, billionaire
driven demonstrations as a spontaneous, grassroots populist uprising against racist dictator Donald. From a press
release from MoveOn.org:

Related: Soros And Liberal Mega-Donors Plot For War With Donald Trump

"The gatherings - organized by MoveOn.org and allies - will affirm a continued rejection of Donald Trump's bigotry,
xenophobia, Islamophobia, and misogyny and demonstrate our resolve to fight together for the America we still
believe is possible."
The Soros-affiliated machine further boasts:

"Within two hours of the call-to-action, MoveOn members had created more than 200 gatherings nationwide, with
the number continuing to grow on Wednesday afternoon.

The Washington oligarchy's propaganda ministry wants the world to believe a groundswell of concerned, mindful citizens
have taken to the streets in a surge of moralistic patriotic fervor determined to derail the spread of Trump's legitimacy as the
so called leader of the "free world," that is if you still believe living in a fascist totalitarian police state called Amerika
is still "the free world."

Thanks to the likes of the Clintons, Obama and the Bushes who've for decades conspired to strip away all our constitutional
rights and freedoms in the name of New World Order deep state tyranny, "the free world" no longer exists on this planet.

But the self-righteous, follow-the-leader sheep of befuddled malcontents rioting in the streets across America
haven't a clue with propaganda lies now owning them.

Related: Trump Campaign Manager Calls on Democrats to Tell Paid Protesters to Cut it Out

In every large city in America that voted heavily for Hillary, a Soros organized and financed mercenary army has been
unleashed engaging in violent destructive behavior.

We're all supposed to accept MSM reporting that tens of thousands of fellow Americans who in good conscience just can't
accept a Trump-led United States are joining forces in righteous solidarity, defiantly marching now in large numbers crying
foul that that a "xenophobic racist" is soon to be our president.

They're violently hitting the streets in robotic, monkey see, monkey do support for a former serial rapist president
and his thug wife who intimidated and silenced all his victims and who also lost Tuesday's election.
Related: Secret Recordings Fueled Mutinous FBI Investigation of Clintons Despite DOJ Orders To "Stand Down"

And as far as their track record, the Clintons have been consistently supporting and implementing the globalist agenda that
exploits racial tensions promoting racial and religious division and war against dark skinned people.

Though the Clintons have always paid lip service pretending to support minorities in order to secure their votes,
they have never done anything beneficial for people of color.

Take a look at how they raked in millions from their Haiti post-earthquake scam, leaving the Western Hemisphere's poorest
nation's people abandoned, still suffering and thoroughly ripped off. If you want to get real with racism and sexual
perversion, than look no further than the Clintons.
But in a truth-starved, deep state world, the automatons now running violently in America's streets have systematically
been conditioned to be oblivious to the truth.

In Hillary and Bill's belated concession speech, each conspicuously wore purple in a symbolic covert message giving the
greenlight to the latest Soros' funded "color revolution" taking place in America.

As Paul Craig Roberts incisively observes, the anti-Trump protesters are mere tools of the oligarchy to "de-legitimize"
the Trump presidency the same way Soros funded while Hillary's US State Department NGO's were used to disfavor
the democratically elected Ukraine president three years ago that led to his overthrow in February 2014.

Soros-Hillary's blood-soaked hands in past color revolutions sponsored by the CIA destabilized the Middle East and North
Africa during 2011's Arab Spring Uprising that included Syria, Tunisia, Egypt, Libya among others.
Related: Thanks to WikiLeaks, we now have direct email evidence of the collusion between the MSM and Hillary
Clinton

The subversive objective is regime change by inciting domestic tensions and upheaval designed to destabilize wherever
Empire encounters resistance to its brutal rape and pillaging.

Lingering effects from these abominable, highly illicit Soros-Clinton operations interfering with the internal affairs of targeted
sovereign nations around the world are still lethally raging as wars in Ukraine, Syria, Libya and Yemen, chaotic disaster in
Venezuela, simmering violent tensions periodically boiling over in Armenia's Nagorno-Karabakh, South Sudan and now the
Philippines as well among many more.

Any nation state that refuses to be chewed up and spit out by US Empire/World Bank/IMF economic hit job becomes a
CIA/NGO target for violent coups and insurrections, and now it's USA's turn using the Trump presidency as its next victim.

As if the bloodshed and violence that George Soros' filthy money has caused around the globe isn't enough, as of late he's
been especially active in America trying to create race wars on US soil.
Related: Trumps Opponents See Normal Americans as Deplorables - Paul Craig Roberts

Spending millions to send busloads of his mercenary army of agitators to foment riots and violence in inner cities
right after another white cop kills another unarmed black man in Ferguson and Baltimore, Soros as a huge $25
million Clinton campaign donor also deployed mentally handicapped individuals to disrupt and incite brawls at
Trump rallies this year blaming it on opponents Sanders and Trump.

The bloodsucking Soros thrives on stirring up trouble and hostilities around the globe, pitting various people and groups
against each other as part of his elitist strategy to divide and rule over the world.

Since the late 1980's the double trouble kingpin has conspired insurgence and regime change revolts in Eastern European
nations like Poland and the Czech Republic and ran the show dictating at will with his money and unbridled power what
Secretary of State puppet Hillary needed to do in Ukraine, Albania and elsewhere in order to continue receiving both his
financial support and "guidance."

This week the Soros and Clinton paid minions are out in full force deployed onto the streets of Washington, New York,
Boston, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Oakland, Portland, Seattle and Austin, totaling over
a couple dozen cities.

Related: Blocks Of Anti-Trump Protest Buses Caught On Tape

As a matter of fact, photographic evidence proving the protests are nothing more than artificially staged "civil disturbances"
inflicted on America by Soros, a fleet of chartered buses showed up in Austin, Texas.

But of course the loyal Clinton presstitutes are creating the false narrative that an authentic citizen uprising is
organically growing out of moral indignation for Trump, and they're milking it for all its worth with headlines like
"Anti-Trump Protests Spread Around Nation."

Ironically it was supposed to be all the disgruntled Trump diehards who would angrily rise up in arms after the rigged
election triggers a violent national citizen revolt from Trump supporters. But instead it's the violent rabblerousing Hillary
camp starting fires and spreading anarchy in America's streets.
With purple Hillary and MSM's subtly hidden blessings, mainstream coverage of the ensuing violence and property damage
continuing to erupt for a third straight day in a row is predictably being downplayed. Reuters reports:

"The protests were for the most part peaceful and orderly, although there were scattered acts of civil disobedience
and damage to property."

Reuters goes on to explain only "a handful of protesters" were arrested in Portland, Oregon.

That said, in stark contrast, this is what "peaceful" pro-Hillary demonstrations actually look like. Enraged Trump haters
went out seeking revenge against the Donald's supporters celebrating early Wednesday morning at Times Square,
promptly crashing Trump's party with violent clashes. Pro-Hillary supporters resorted to widespread violence in at
least two dozen US cities.

Reports that American flags have been burned in multiple cities is actually right in synch with Hillary and her
globalists' masterplan to erase all sovereign borders in favor of their one world government.

So will the globalists' trade agreements like TPP and TTIP that Hillary secretly supports put the final nail in the
coffin of America as a sovereign independent nation.

The so called peaceful demonstrators turned into violent rioters in a number of locations like Oakland and Portland, setting
fire to garbage and tires and breaking windows.

An unruly mob of 7,000 Oakland protesters quickly grew out of control, engaging in acts of arson starting about 40 different
fires, throwing rocks, bottles, M-80's and Molotov cocktails at police injuring three officers who then fired tear gas to break
up the crowd as thick plumes of smoke filled the embattled city skies.

Related: PROOF The Trump protests utilizing paid professional protesters financed by George Soros
An Oakland police patrol car was also torched. One entire Oakland block was seriously vandalized. Protesters spray painted
graffiti messages "kill Trump" and "fuck Trump" as they set fires. At least 30 were arrested during the Oakland rampage.

The more vocal pro-Hillary outbursts began surfacing on America's college campuses. At the University of Oregon and
California universities like UCLA and UC Berkeley the anti-Trump forces converged... a far cry from the 60's and early 70's
when these same colleges were the bastions of the antiwar peace movement.

Now the same schools are spawning violence in support of their nasty crime boss who vowed to bomb
Russia and Iran. Meanwhile, the object of their violent hatred is a noninterventionist vowing to help Putin kill the
very same terrorists that their favored losing candidate helped create and continues supporting.

Sadly, times have vastly changed not for the better. Too many university students today are media brainwash victims.

Related: Report: Three Million Votes in Presidential Election Cast by Illegal Aliens

Across America hundreds of protesters have been arrested. In Los Angeles about 3,000 demonstrators gathered in two
places, disrupting traffic commandeering the 101 freeway that passes through the downtown area. Another contingent of
angry anti-Trump protestors assembled outside of Los Angeles city hall.

A bloody head of Trump was burned in effigy. In all, 29 people were reported to be arrested in LA. A confrontation between
police and protesters in Orange County's Santa Ana witnessed a brick thrown into a police cruiser, two other cars damaged
and two businesses vandalized with 10 arrests.

4,000 protesters in Portland disrupted downtown traffic and forced train delays, shattered windows, lit a fire in a dumpster
and vandalized 19 vehicles at a car dealership. A group of violent anarchists led the crowd inciting property destruction
although a number of demonstrators chanted "peaceful protest."

But likely the Soros paid agitators succeeded in turning the protest into a riot, resulting in at least 26 arrests. Denver
protesters walked onto Interstate 25 shutting down both sides of the freeway for a half hour. 500 demonstrators assembled
in Louisville.
In New York City over 30 were arrested gathering in two locations, one outside the Trump Tower and another at Columbus
Circle. Clinton loyalists Lady Gaga, Madonna and Cher joined the Trump Tower protesters on Wednesday night where
American flags were burned as well as in Philadelphia and Washington. 15 arrests were made at the Trump Towers in New
York for disorderly conduct.

Speaking of has-been celebrities, in dire desperation the last week of her campaign, Hillary paraded her A-list
of star power onto the stage playing the pied piping idolatry card as a last gasp cheap ploy to condescendingly buy
votes from the younger generations.

Beyonc, husband Jay Z, Katy Perry, Miley Cyrus, LeBron James and Bruce Springsteen all payed homage to their favorite
crime boss. Meanwhile, Cher, Lena Dunham, Samuel L. Jackson, Barbra Streisand, Amy Schumer, Jon Stewart, George
Lopez, Al Sharpton, and Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg have all gone on public record stating that they plan
to move out of the country if the rigged election still fails to get their murdering crime boss queen elected. Good riddance!

On Friday evening protests were organized in Miami and West Palm Beach as well. 1000 demonstrators each marched in
Milwaukee and Minneapolis, slightly less in Columbus, Ohio. Up to 2,000 marchers in Chicago gathered at Trump Tower
while others attempted to obstruct traffic.
Related: Anti-Trump Protests: Proof Of Professional Activist Involvement

USA Today counted over 50 protests since Tuesday night and over a dozen more known already planned.
The MoveOn.org supplying the centralized organizers of these nationwide protests in reaction to a Trump presidency is
intended to spread and grow over time into a political movement throughout the country.

Soros is prepared to fuel the protests with deep pockets and paid professional anarchists designed to incite
widespread violence, vandalism and civil unrest throughout the US.

The treasonous aging billionaire is seeking regime change right here in America in plain sight, clearly a direct
assault on our nation's democratic principles, against both the democratically elected leader as well as against the
will of the American people who specifically voted for the outsider as a rejection of the very corrupt dirty power
politics game represented by Soros, Hillary and her Democratic Party.

Related: Break Up the Democratic Party: Its Time for the Clintons and Rubin to Go - and Soros Too

The hypocritical hubris of these diehard Clinton supporters is projected on full display when they resort to lawbreaking
anarchy violence at the same time that misguided, flowery language flows out of their mouths. In the words of one New York
protester:

"There's a man who's the human embodiment of hate who's going to become our next president, so the best thing
we can do is try to connect with people who are representing love and connection...

Hmm, like the most dangerous, warmongering presidential candidate in US history who promised the world that America
would go to war against both Russia and Iran... or the vicious, demonic mastermind who buys violence, death and
destruction like they're commodities on a monopoly board, or like the "loving" protesters spreading violence across America
right now, all in the name of love and connection.

Meanwhile, anti-Trump death threats showed up on Twitter calling for Trump and his Vice President-elect Mike Pence to
be assassinated. That's how some who object to Trump show their love.

If it were angry Trump supporters on a wild rampage like this, mainstream media would be calling protesters
committing this exact same behavior as hateful, anti-American racists bent on causing race wars in cities across
America, forcing the government to take measures to quell such out of control, Trump-inspired violent anarchy and
hate.

In the same way that Soros and the media giants both engage in race baiting that foments further violence and unrest in
places like Ferguson and Baltimore as part of a sinister globalist agenda, the same diabolical dynamic is currently underway
with the media inciting American citizens to hit the streets in protest and a meta-message to spread violence and bloodshed
that will invariably be blamed on Donald Trump, who is being demonized just like Putin and Assad.

The disturbing truth here is there's a hidden Soros-Clinton-MSM agenda purposely adding fuel to the fire so that
paid Soros-Hillary shills violently act out in efforts to lead another color revolution coup staged as an "out of
control crisis" and "national rebellion."

Remember the operative word here is perception where MSM covertly creates and stages a false narrative that a national
emergency will warrant President Obama to opportunistically call out the National Guard in order to stabilize the nation
"bordering on civil war," thus handing him the excuse to declare martial law prior to Trump's inauguration in January.

Or if that particular endgame scenario fails to materialize, as long as the civil unrest and widespread violence continues to
grow nationally, the ruling elite may engineer some other form of false flag crisis like a cyberattack on the US banking
infrastructure, then subversively blame the Trump-Putin duo for the conspiracy.
Related: Soros, Liberal Billionaires Meet in DC to Plan War on Trump

Or if Trump does manage to outlast his January inauguration date and become president, you can bet that the globalists will
soon thereafter unleash a full blown financial crisis where their house of cards global economy collapses like dominos into a
worse depression than the one that followed the 1929 stock market crash that they also initiated.

President Trump of course would be accused of causing that catastrophe as well.

That's why this election was rigged by preprogrammed voting machines to deliver the outcome that has shocked so many.
Once the elite deemed Hillary to be damaged goods and a liability with all her nonstop scandals and criminality, suddenly a
decision was made to fix the election so a narrow margin of victory could be claimed by Donald Trump.

Comment: The narrative that Trump is controlled opposition is yet another desperate attempt to derail positive
developments in the battle against the Cabal.

When just before the election Hillary and Bill were both accused of being pedophiles by honest members of the New York
Police Department and the FBI after discovering evidence on Anthony Weiner's laptop, directly connecting the Clintons to
their billionaire buddy, registered sex offender and fellow pedophile Jeffrey Epstein's international child sex slavery
trafficking ring, the elite conceded defeat and threw Hillary under the bus.
With this worldwide child sex ring threatening to expose not only the Clintons but the likes of the Bushes, Prince Andrew,
other members of European royalty, multiple high court judges in both North America and Europe, prominent politicians in
both US Congress as well as European parliaments, high ranking military officers and world famous entertainers as part of a
Satanic worshipping cabal that rules the world,

But it's too late for that now as the cat's already been let out of the bag .

Courageous whistleblowers in both law enforcement and journalism are pushing for the ugly truth to be fully exposed as the
best opportunity to remove this criminal cabal from power once and for all, seeking justice by placing the perpetrators on trial
for their unlimited high crimes that include treason, war atrocities, pedophilia, human genocide and crimes against
humanity.

An international truth and reconciliation commission will need to be organized to facilitate those from lower levels of this
international cabal to come forth providing evidence and testimony to hold those guilty at the top fully accountable. This tall
order is what "draining the swamp" will really be all about.
Getting rid of the subhuman scum that have controlled virtually all human affairs over the past few centuries will pave the
way for a new beginning where such advanced technologies as free energy and a resource-based global infrastructure can
be developed and built to sustain a population of 11 billion people.

By purging the crime cabal leaders and their puppet masters, the ruling elite's plan to commit human genocide by drastically
reducing the world population from its current 7.4 billion to just over a half billion people will be circumvented. Once we
"drain the swamp" of these Satanic mass murderers, a social, economic and spiritual transformation will then finally be freely
in place to promote humans into living in harmony and peace on this earth the way that God originally intended.

Related Articles:

Clinton Foundation: Admits hiding Qatar's $1M 'donation'; Killary at the 'center of the wheel'

Podesta email bombshell: Clinton campaign was heavily funded by Monsanto

Huma Abedin Said To Suffer Emotional Breakdown

FBI Now 99% Certain at Least 5 Foreign Agencies Hacked Into Hillarys Server

What? Clinton Camp Says Media Bias Caused Loss

Martin Armstrong Exposes "The Real Clinton Conspiracy" Which Backfired Dramatically

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton walk in to a bar

This is the email that hacked Hillary Clintons campaign chief

Memo to Hillary Supporters: Trump Won, Stop Whining and Grow Up

How Hillary Clinton Stole the Democratic Nomination from Bernie Sanders, Did Not Legally Win the Popular Vote
Are Microwave Transmission Weapons Of Mass Destruction Being Used To Trigger
Catastrophic Earthquakes? + New Zealand Earthquake: The Worlds Biggest Offshore
Seismic Blasting Ship The Amazon Warrior
November 17 2016 | From: GeoEngineeringWatch / TheContrail

Are unimaginably powerful microwave transmissions actively and aggressively being used as
weapons of mass destruction? If all available evidence is examined, the logical conclusions are
chilling.

Understanding the full potential of the power that can be projected from the ionosphere heater installations (like
HAARP) is difficult and complex.

Related: Worlds Biggest Seismic Testing Ship Amazon Warrior Parked On Top Of New Zealand Fault Line & 6.2
Aftershock Shakes New Zealand After Powerful 7.8 Earthquake Kills At Least 2

We all know and understand that microwave transmissions produced in our countertop ovens can heat a cup of water
(or frozen TV dinners) at blinding speed. Unfortunately, most don't know and thus have never even considered (let alone
investigated) what massively powerful and interlinked microwave transmissions can do to the planet.

When immensely powerful microwave transmissions are bounced off the atmosphere (facilitated by the atmospheric aerosol
saturation) and directed back into the Earth's strata (in a seismically sensitive location), the triggering of seismic activity
becomes scientifically possible.
The constant jet aircraft spraying of reflective and electrically conductive particles into the atmosphere (as part of the
ongoing climate engineering/geoengineering assault) is a verifiable fact. Is New Zealand, yet again, the victim of microwave
transmission super-weapons?

There is a long list of shocking facts surrounding a number of recent catastrophic earthquakes. It is imperative to examine
these facts without preconceptions or programmed denial.

Let's start with the month leading up to the extremely destructive 2010 earthquake in Haiti, MIT satellite monitoring detected
a radical increase in ULF (ultra low frequency/microwave) radio transmissions over the quake epicenter.

Spacecraft Saw ULF Radio Emissions over Haiti before January Quake

A French satellite observed a dramatic increase in ultra low frequency radio waves over Haiti in the month before
the M7.0 earthquake earlier this year.

DEMETERs is an unusual mission. Its job is to monitor low frequency radio waves generated by earthquakes.

Today, a group of geoscientists release the data associated with the M 7.0 earthquake that struck Haiti in January.
They say that DEMETER saw a clear increase in ultralow frequency radio waves being emitted from the Earths
the crust in that region in the build up to the quake.

The anecdotal evidence of electromagnetic effects associated with earthquakes is legion. Various accounts link
earthquakes with mysterious light and heating effects."

After the Haiti quake, the US military moved in and occupied the country. In addition, the long drawn-out Clinton Foundation
reconstruction debacle began.
The following year a deadly earthquake struck Christchurch, New Zealand. Many circumstances surrounding this disaster
were also troubling. Did US officials know the earthquake was coming? Some excerpts from a report on the disaster are
below.

"Was the Christchurch earthquake a terrible natural disaster, or was it a terrible MAN MADE disaster?

9 members of US Congress were in Christchurch for a summit meeting on Feb 21 & 22 but left Christchurch 2.5
hours before the earthquake hit and relocated to Wellington even though the meeting was not due to finish until the
evening of Feb 22nd.

The US Secretary of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano, was supposed to be visiting Christchurch and speaking
at the summit meeting on Feb 22, but on Feb 18 announced she was cancelling her visit 3.

The Deputy Administrator of FEMA (US Federal Emergency Management Agency), Timothy Manning, just
happened to be in Christchurch at the time with a US delegation.

All of the rest of the delegation left Christchurch shortly before the quake hit except for Mr Manning who stayed
behind, and then after the quake hit he assisted with directing the emergency response.

Exactly the same thing happened with FEMA delegates with the Haiti earthquake. In Haiti , the FEMA delegates
just happened to be there at the time conducting training exercises for responding to major earthquakes."

Recent releases from Wikileaks resulted in the headline below:

Hillary Clinton Emails Show Advanced Warning of Christchurch Earthquake.


In the days before the catastrophic Japanese Earthquake (that occurred on March 11, 2016), world renowned research
institution, MIT, yet again, noted extremely profound and anomalous atmospheric heating directly over the quake
epicenter. MIT published the following report:

"Atmosphere Above Japan Heated Rapidly Before M9 Earthquake

Infrared emissions above the epicenter increased dramatically in the days before the devastating earthquake in
Japan, say scientists.

They say that before the M9 earthquake, the total electron content of the ionosphere increased dramatically over
the epicentre, reaching a maximum three days before the quake struck.

At the same time, satellite observations showed a big increase in infrared emissions from above the epicentre,
which peaked in the hours before the quake. In other words, the atmosphere was heating up."
Though the science community is desperately trying to link pre-quake atmospheric heating to some unknown phenomenon
of an atmospheric coupling with the pressure buildup in the strata, is this a rational conclusion?

The much more logical and straightforward conclusion is this, the atmospheric heating is being intentionally created by the
global network of ionosphere heaters as immense microwave signals are bounced off of the atmosphere and back down into
the planet.

Unfortunately, the science community is not allowed to even consider this possibility, let alone talk about it. In the period
preceding the decimating Japanese earthquake, US Japanese relations were very strained.

The post-quake scenario of US/Japanese relations seemed to suddenly be unquestionable, was there a connection? Was
the catastrophic quake just a natural event? Or an engineered warning to Japan?

On the 13th of November, 2016, another catastrophic earthquake struck near Christchurch, New Zealand.

The list of troubling questions surrounding this earthquake is long and growing. Below are some quotes from seismologist
Anna Kaiser (who is investigating the latest New Zealand earthquake activity):

"We don't know what we are dealing with right now but it may be it involves potentially more than one fault we
need to figure out what was going on before and after the 7.5 magnitude quake "

Kaiser went on to say this:

"We're working very hard this is looking quite complex. The epicenter was possibly just south of the Hope fault,
but it did look like "something else was going on.

The seismologist statements are only the beginning, there are many more concerning factors surrounding the latest New
Zealand Earthquake that should be considered.
In spite of the unfolding US election circumstances, in the days before the latest New Zealand quake John Kerry first went to
Christchurch, and then on to McMurdo Station, Antarctica.

The stated purpose of Kerry's visit was to examine the effects of global warming and the record low sea ice, but this trip at
this time was criticized by some.

"US Secretary of State John Kerry is scheduled to head back to New Zealand after checking out summer in
Antarctica.

He's been criticized for heading to such a remote place while the US election riveted the world

He tweeted a photograph of himself boarding C-17 cargo plane in Christchurch saying "headed to Antarctica to see
firsthand some of the drastic effects of climate change".

In Antarctica he was scheduled to meet with scientists and researchers at McMurdo Station, the largest research
station of the US Antarctic programme, as well as visit surrounding areas on Ross Island, and the US
Government's Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station.

He is the first secretary of state and the most senior US government official to ever travel to Antarctica.

He is hosted by the US National Science Foundation, which manages the US Antarctic program me."
In fact Antarctica has just broken a new climate record, with record low winter sea ice. After a peak of 18.5 million square
kilometers in late August, sea ice began retreating about a month ahead of schedule and has been setting daily low records
through most of September.

Though Antarctic sea ice (and global sea ice) are at record shattering low levels, why else might John Kerry go to McMurdo
Station at this exact window of time? Could the ionosphere heater (microwave transmission) facility that is constructed at
McMurdo be a factor?
Noctilucent clouds in the skies above Antarctica are an ominous harbinger of the atmospheric damage that is occurring there

"Many are under the belief that HAARP, now labeled IRI, no longer exists Operationally due to the
Gakona, AK spin. One must understand that these Frequency Generators are Globally Ubiquitous. There are so
many that are of dissimilar designs, and go by different acronyms, it is not seen as functionally one and the same.

In the case of McMurdos Radome and all of the Radar equipment there; Raytheon has had the contracts
beginning to end. The National Science Foundation and Raytheon Polar Services Company are housed in the
same building. For years the station has grown. It can house 1258 personnel and an average of 200 winter over."

Raytheon is one of the largest private "defense contractors" on the planet, this corporation is also the holder of
numerous climate engineering patents including some that relate directly to ionosphere heaters. The power structure is likely
microwaving the skies for a multitude of reasons, none of those reasons are in the interest of the common good.

Shocking atmospheric flashing lights were filmed in the skies above New Zealand as the massive Earthquake was
occurring.

Kerry returned to Christchurch from Antarctica, and then promptly (and conveniently) departed only hours before the
catastrophic earthquake struck.

The statement below is from CBS news.


"Sec. John Kerry had left the country before it struck, and just landed in Singapore on his way to Oman when news
of the quake was reported.

Is it just a coincidence that US officials always seem to safely depart quake impact zones just prior to the event?

Then there is this headline to consider:

"Worlds Biggest Seismic Testing Blast Ship Amazon Warrior Parked on top of New Zealand Fault
Line

Is this just a coincidence?

Another point of interest, New Zealanders protested against US Oil exploration continued right up to the day before the
quake. Then there was the conflict in New Zealand over the visit of a US warship, this story was covered the day before the
quake hit.

The New Zealand Prime Minister's apparent apprehension about the US election results just days prior to the quake are also
of interest.

Finally, could known massive oil deposits just off the New Zealand coast also be a part of the equation?

Microwave transmission signals/rings near Antarctica are clearly visible in the satellite composite image shown below.
The regions of New Zealand near the epicenter have been constantly assaulted with aerosols spraying and microwave
transmissions.
The uniform ribbing of aerosolized cloud cover is a clear indication of microwave transmission exposure.

Though some "official" sources try to explain this type of cloud pattern as being a result of the underlying land topography,
this explanation is patently false.

The same patterns are now regularly seen over oceans as well as land as is shown in the satellite photo below that was
taken of New Zealand directly over the quake region.
The image below bears testimony to what the global power structure does to those that try to get in the way of their agendas
and operations.

This photo is of the bridge of the Greenpeace ship "The Rainbow Warrior". It was bombed and sunk by the French Secret
Service in order to prevent the ship and its crew from witnessing ongoing illegal and unimaginably destructive nuclear
detonations.
Over 2 decades ago I dove alone on the wreck of the Rainbow Warrior, as it laid on the seafloor off the coast of New
Zealand. I swam through the area shown above, around the ship, and examined the gapping bomb blast hole in the hull of
the once noble vessel. I hovered over the wreck and contemplated the tyranny of those who rule the world.

We are all at a crossroads, and the horizon is darkening rapidly. The power structure wields weapons of unimaginable
destruction, they can only do so because of the order-followers that carry out their insanity. As the saying goes, "we have
seen the enemy, and they are us".

It is up to us, the people, all of us, to refuse any further participation in the insanity. It is up to us to fully investigate and fully
face the whole truth. It is up to us to prioritize the fight for the greater good because we owe that debt to our children, to the
planet, and to the whole.

Make your voice heard, while you can, while it can still matter.

New Zealand Earthquake: The Worlds Biggest Offshore Seismic Blasting Ship The
Amazon Warrior

Dots: Super-supermoon, Climate change huckster American Politician, Amazon Warrior, Oil
Exploration and Mapping for drilling, Earthquake M7.5 and plates shifting generating many
aftershocks the entire length of the fault line through NZ.

The 11/13/16 quake, with a magnitude of 7.8, was much stronger than the magnitude-6.3 quake in 2011. But it also
was much deeper - striking 23 kilometers (14 miles) below the earth's surface. The 2011 quake had a depth of just 5
kilometers (3 miles). The shallower a quake is, the more destruction it tends to cause.
The evil empire are after New Zealand's unobtainium. First shake up the locals, destroy infrastructure, weaken the economy
and then extort deals to rape the resources of the country.

If you were planning to do seismic blasting off the coast of a Country, the best time to do it would be with the super full moon
wouldnt it? So that people only discuss that as the possible reason.

Kaikoura was clearly the target now destroyed, and that basin is full of the precious oil for the foreign bankers and the only
thing stopping them was the people of Kaikoura - now homeless and to be relocated by NZ Navy ship. Kaikoura is also
known for its whale populations, the area should be protected from ALL sonic oil exploration and Naval activity!

The Worlds Biggest Seismic Testing Ship - The US "Amazon Warrior" - Parked On Top Of New
Zealand Fault Line during the November 13, 2016 Earthquake!

The Worlds biggest seismic blasting ship the Amazon Warrior was photographed off Rarangi Beach in Cloudy Bay last
night. Right on top of a major fault line. The ship was met with protests when it arrived on the 13th! It was seen off the
Coast of Kaikoura on Nov. 13th, but its ETA from Panama was 10 am on Nov 14th in Wellington.
The Amazon Warrior came from Panama, was seen off of Kaikoura on the 13th and then went to anchor off of Cloudy Bay
at the top of the South Island, across the channel from Wellington. If you are steaming to NZ from Panama, and your
destination is Wellington, then there is no need to go an extra 95 miles south before arriving at your charted destination;
after a long sea journey of 7,353 miles.

This fact alone shows that there was something very fishy going on in the state of Aotearoa.

If their scheduled arrival was for 10am on the 14th in Wellington, then their trip to Kaikoura was already calculated into their
original ETA. The AW's estimated project-to-project transit speed is 17 knots or 19.5633 mph. Thus traveling the 7353 miles
to NZ will take around 16 days, and the last report in Vessel Finder was Oct 25, 2016 17:52 UTC which was probably the
departure time from Panama.

Roughly Oct 26 to Oct 13 is 19 days, so they left plenty of leeway to ensure they could make it to Kaikoura before heading
to Wellingtonhowever rather than 3 days leeway, it is only 2 days because NZ is one day ahead of Panama.

On a ship like the Amazon Warrior... to travel 95 miles distance from Kaikoura to Wellington it takes around 5 hours, so they
have 1.75 days to engage in their seismic mayhem. The ship only pulled into Cloudy Bay to avoid the protesters at
Wellington. Yea, rather obvious isn't it. By their deeds shall they shall be known.
Further information on the Amazon Warrior is available here and here.

The Amazon Warrior is owned by WesternGeco which is a geophysical services company. It is headquartered in
the Schlumberger House on the property of London Gatwick Airport in Crawley, West Sussex, and also has an office in
Denver CO. The company provides reservoir imaging, monitoring, and development services.

The company, a business segment of Schlumberger, offers 3D and time-lapse seismic surveys, electromagnetic surveys,
and multicomponent surveys for delineating prospects and reservoir management.

The giant defense contractor Raytheon, now holds all 12 HAARP patents. HAARP devises can be made mobile on ships,
such as the HAARP Sea-Based X-Band Radar (SBX) platform.
A HAARP phased array antenna system was transmitting the 2.5Hz ULF frequency and it triggered the 9.0 magnitude
earthquake off of Japan and ensuing tsunami.

The earthquake inducing 2.5 Hz ULF frequency was being broadcasted for two days prior to March 11, 2011during which
time the sky over Tokyo turned red as the ionosphere was pulled down into the oxygen rich atmosphere. DARPA is also
developing an airborne version of HAARP.

Related: HAARP to blame for Japan Quake?

Any country that is in the way of an oil pipeline, has valuable and strategic resources, or threatens to drop the $US dollar
standard is in danger of being chemtrailed, HAARP zapped and attacked with earthquakes and extreme weather events.

The earthquake frequency can be focused on an area during a solar flare event or full moon and once the earthquake is
triggered, a seismic research vessel like the Amazon Warrior can take readings of the shockwaves moving through the
earths crust and get an excellent picture of oil deposits even at very deep levels.

Ray Tomes:

America and NZ tested a system of using bombs to cause seismic activity and make tsunamis as a weapon in
1944 off the coat of NZ (yes, 72 years ago). "Preliminary modelling suggests that the earthquake was caused by a
rupture of a northeast-striking fault that projects to the surface offshore"

Related: What happened in New Zealand's magnitude 7.5 earthquake?

The Amazon Warrior is due to commence imminent seismic testing for oil on behalf of Norwegian Oil giant Statoil. Seismic
testing involves the dragging of a seismic airgun along the seabed, emitting seismic blasts every 10 seconds, 24 hours a
day, from now until next May.
Statoil acquired their permit from American multinational oil corporation Chevron, and the permit extends along the eastern
seaboard and to depths that are unprecedented for New Zealand.

Seismic blasting has been proven to be disruptive and harmful to sea life, including marine mammals, and is opposed by
coastal fishing interests and eco-tourism operators including Ngi Tahus Whale Watch ventures.

Chevron Corporation (NYSE: CVX) is an American multinational energy corporation. One of the successor companies of
Standard Oil, it is headquartered in San Ramon, California, and active in more than 180 countries.

Standard Oil Co. Inc. was an American oil producing, transporting, refining, and marketing company. Established in 1870
by John D. Rockefeller as a corporation in Ohio, it was the largest oil refiner in the world of its time.
Tesla-HAARP-Earthquakes

Tesla quaked Manhattan around Houston St. with a small resonant device attached to a beam in his workshop/lab, and
smashed it with a hammer when it started to shake things to a dangerous level, which stopped the quake instantly.

One of his basic working principles was resonance, mechanical and electromagnetic. It's how the Tesla coil drives up huge
voltage on a low current.

HAARP is an adaptation of Tesla technology used for nefarious purposes. The microwave array broils the Upper
Atmosphere to 100F with a focused and steerable electromagnetic beam, that lifts areas of the ionosphere by heating those
areas. Electromagnetic waves then bounce back onto earth and penetrate everything - living and dead.

Along with chemtrails and this heating of the atmosphere with HAARP dries up precipitation thus producing drought. I learnt
somewhere they
HAARP uses sunspot cycles, sunspots, solar flares, hurricanes, fault tension build ups etc... for a EMF assisted corporate-
political warfare. HAARP is boost assist and director of natural energies. They can even reflect of the moon to generate
massive explosions.

On the HAARP web site in 2001 discussed successful moon bounce experiments (done since the 1960's by HAM radio
operators) see: HAARP array may use Moon as a reflector to reach distant targets on Earth to create Nuclear-Sized
Explosions Without Radiation!. In order to target the moon you need a steerable array and three arrays minimum are
required.

Related: HAARP likely not Primary Ionospheric array in Alaska

HAARP is capable of creating weather like hurricanes and tornadoes and tsunamis and earthquakes. It is also capable of
altering peoples moods.
NASA tomographic image of the subducted Farallon Plate in the mantle beneath eastern North America

Earth tomography is used by the oil and gas industry to find deposits. Tomography refers to imaging by sections or
sectioning, through the use of any kind of penetrating wave or mechanical method. ELF waves or extremely low frequency
waves can trigger an earthquake on faults that have built up tension.

Thus a ship like Amazon Warrior with even weak exploratory ELF waves can trigger fault lines into concussive domino effect
earthquakes of any magnitude depending on how much tension is held in the tectonic ridges.

HAARP Weapon How to Make an Earthquake

Conclusion

It appears that the earthquake was accidentally triggered by the Amazon Warrior's exploratory ELF waves...then they
quickly pulled out of the area to avoid being held responsible, but didn't go to Wellington due to the protest, and possible
fear of reprisal from the New Zealand Navy.

However it is illegal to travel through New Zealand waters and conduct personal "business" PRIOR to checking in officially
at one's port of entry first.

I conclude that the 11/13 quakes were accidentally triggered by an oil exploratory vessel working for Chevron. So
Chevron should be made responsible for picking up the tab for repairing the damage to the countrys infrastructure
and the lives of the people by this little chiropractic adjustment to the backbone of New Zealand.
The ship went about their business conducting their "research" in New Zealand territorial waters PRIOR to officially
checking in with customs.

Plus this sortie was premeditated due to the original ETA, and so their actions were criminal and secretive... by going for the
gold (oil) first before being invited into the country.

However reading the shenanigans of US officials in Christchurch before and after the 2011 quake....it appears that the
11/13/16 quake swarm was likely deliberate, and appears to be an act of economic war.

Related Articles:

Earthquakes: Worldview of New Zealand, Macquarie Island, Guadalupe Island & Nova Scotia / Nov. 13, 2016

New Zealand on NASA EOSDIS Worldview: A Collection of Various Screenshots / 2016

Goldman Sachs And the Sacking of New Zealand

Goldman Sachs appears to be undertaking economic warfare on areas to drive up the prices of its commodities
and stocks, and to lay claim to resources.
Canadian wildfires, pipeline attacks in Nigeria and the Gulf Oil Spill are likely sabotage undertaken by Goldman Sachs to
drive up prices for its own benefit.

In New Zealand now, the Christchurch and Kaikoura quakes and the Rena shipwreck toxic spill event are acts of
war against a sovereign nation for economic gain and to intimidate and demoralize Kiwis into submission to the
poisoning and sacking of their country.

On 5 October 2011 the Rena ran aground near Tauranga, New Zealand, resulting in an oil spill. The spill has been
described as New Zealand's worst maritime environmental disaster.
The ship was carrying 1,368 containers, eight of which contained hazardous materials, as well as 1,700 tonnes of heavy fuel
oil and 200 tonnes of marine diesel oil.

Related: Rena Oil Spill

The election of the ex-Goldman Sachs exec John Keys is key to the implementation of the disaster capitalization
and resource rape of New Zealand.

Related: Goldman Sachs Plans for the depopulation of the East Coast of New Zealand for Oil & Gas Drilling by BP,
Shell Oil & Todd Energy

Goldman Sachs Now Sees Chevron Better Off Than Exxon Mobil. Goldman Sachs is now buying and selling enough natural
gas to make it one of the key players on the market - even reportedly overtaking oil major Exxon Mobil and Chevron.
According to a recent regulatory filing, Goldman Sachs bought and sold 1.2 trillion cubic feet of physical gas in the U.S. in
2015, which equates to 25 percent of the countrys residential consumption and more than double its 2013 volumes.

These figures turn Goldman Sachs and its J Aron commodities division into the seventh largest gas marketer in North
America.

Related: Goldman Sachs Is Now Bigger Than Exxon, Chevron in Nat Gas Trading

Goldman Sachs, Chevron, the owners of the Amazon Warrior and the American Military Industrial Machine should be
charged with war crimes, deliberate environmental sabotage and held accountable to damages.

John Kerry is in Bed with Goldman Sachs as is Evidenced by their Joint white Washing Projects
Secretary of State John Kerry and Lloyd C. Blankfein, chairman and CEO of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS),
in partnership with Harvard Kennedy School have announced the first-ever cross-border exchange and leadership program
to support emerging women leaders across the private and non-profit sectors in the Middle East and Northern Africa.

Senator John Kerry appears to be Goldman Sachs running man, or rather flying manbut appears to be innocent of their
crimes of international disaster capitalism.

John Kerry is the most Carbon Intensive Politician on the Planet - I guess we now know why John Kerry was making a
short notice / unexplained trip to NZ right in the middle of a fierce US elitecon.
He went to Antarctica, which has a HAARP at the US base. Kerry is said to be on a climate saving mission. Speaking
Sunday in Wellington, New Zealand before flying to Oman via Singaporeafter NZ he flew to Oman, and another Arab Gulf
states and then Morocco before winging to Peru and then back home.

John Kerrys current trip could be said to be responsible for 853.4 metric tons of CO2 as many as 52 average Americans
produce in a year. The average CO2 emission for aircraft at 53.3 pounds per air mile. [ CarbonFootprint.com ]

Worlds Biggest Seismic Testing Ship - Amazon Warrior - Parked On Top Of New
Zealand Fault Line & 6.2 Aftershock Shakes New Zealand After Powerful 7.8
Earthquake Kills At Least 2
November 15 2016 | From: MediaWhores / RT / Various

If you were planning to do seismic blasting off the coast of a Country, the best time to do it would
be with the full moon wouldnt it? So that people only discuss that as the possible reason.
The Worlds biggest seismic blasting ship the Amazon Warrior was photographed off Rarangi Beach in Cloudy Bay
last night. Right on top of a major fault line.

Related: Smoking Gun For Christchurch Killer Quake: Hillary Clinton Emails Show Advance Warning Of
Christchurch Earthquake

Green MP Steffan Browning reported it on his Facebook page hours before the giant quakes.

The post has been shared over 400 times at time of this post:
The ship was met with protests when it arrived on the 13th:

Related: Oil protesters throw 'unwelcoming party' on Wellington Harbour

There are trillions of dollars worth of Oil and Gas around NZs shores:

Related: North oil may be worth trillions

It has now been well reported (in the real / social media) that the US State department had advanced knowledge of the
Christchurch Quakes with John Key saying they were man made earthquakes.

Surely the oil company banker would know? Plus the usual dose of foreign spies with extra passports on scene as there
always is with most of these events.
Kaikoura was clearly the target now destroyed, and that basin is full of the precious oil for the foreign bankers and the only
thing stopping them was the people of Kaikoura - now homeless and to be relocated by NZ Navy ship.

Related: Auckland Council backs away from oil exploration stance

And I guess we now know why John Kerry was making a short notice / unexplained trip to NZ right in the middle of
a fierce US elitecon...

Related: Evidence of global warming overwhelming - Kerry

US disaster relief FEMA was in Christchurch the week before the Christchurch earthquake also. Strange how they seem to
know when the quakes will strike isnt it.
Surely John Key, Simon Bridges and their fellow foreign banker mafia should now be rounded up for questioning.
People have died.

Or perhaps Kiwis should just be thankful they havent been carpet bombed, like the same club has done to Iraq, Libya and
Syria for their resources. And Afghanistan for its opium of course.
The USGS website showed that the entire "Ring of Fire" volcanic area was triggered, with over 30 local aftershocks at the time of writing

The semi-retarded Government sponsored experts are all over the media today explaining that there is no way such ships
have the technology to trigger such a large quake.

As if they would have access to accurate info on the latest military technology.

Related: The Transatlantic Trade & Investment Partnership (TTIP) Is Dead + Earthquakes

6.2 Aftershock Shakes New Zealand After Powerful 7.8 Earthquake Kills At Least 2
A new earthquake measuring 6.2 has struck 39km west of Kaikoura, New Zealand. This is one of
the most powerful in a series of tremors that followed a 7.8 magnitude quake which struck the
town, located some 180km northeast of Christchurch, on Sunday.

Local residents Chris and Viv Young look at damage caused by an earthquake along State Highway One near the town of Ward, south of Blenheim
on New Zealand's South Island, November 14, 2016

The quake took place at around 12:30am GMT at a depth of 8.3 kilometers, and was initially measured at 6.8, but
was later downgraded to 6.2 by USGS.

Related: Christchurch: The Man-Made Earthquakes - What Really Happened, How And Why

Meanwhile GeoNet, the official source of geological hazard information for New Zealand, measured the latest quake at 6.3
and said its depth was around 35 kilometers.
At least two people were killed following the initial quake which struck New Zealand just after 11:00am GMT on Sunday
(12:02am Monday local time).

The ministry of civil defense immediately issued a warning saying that a destructive tsunami with waves of up to five
meters (16 feet) was possible. The ministry treated the possibility of a tsunami as an event of life-threatening or national
significance.

Tsunami warning sirens notified residents in coastal areas of New Zealand to leave for higher ground. Police and
emergency workers mobilized in the wake of the quake to help with evacuations. Authorities eventually downgraded tsunami
warnings around the country after people fled and the waves arrived two hours later.

We've canceled the tsunami warning in place for Wellington to Banks Peninsula. Based on all available data, the tsunami
threat has now passed, Civil Defense said in their latest bulletin, stressing that coastal areas could still experience
unusual, strong currents and sea level fluctuations.

New Zealand Prime Minister John Key confirmed that at least two people were killed. Police said one person died in
Kaikoura and another died in Mt. Lyford, a nearby ski resort, AP reported. Police also say that several people had suffered
minor injuries in Kaikoura.

A local state of emergency was declared in Kaikoura and Hurunui. Roads in Canterbury and Marlborough have been
severely damaged. Trains and ferries between North and South Islands were also affected by the quake. Authorities are
now assessing the extent of the damage from the quake.

After the initial 7.8 disaster, all trains on South Island were initially stopped but KiwiRail later resumed services between
Christchurch and Invercargill, local media reported.
Related: Tsunami alert lifted after New Zealand earthquake, aftershocks kill 2

Power and phone lines outages were also reported in addition to the structural damage to homes.

It was the most significant shock I can remember in Wellington, PM Key told reporters. There will be quite major costs
around roads and infrastructure.

Related: New Zealand earthquake: thousands stranded and towns cut off

Paul Has Been Dead For 50 Years [?]


November 14 2016 | From: Inverse / Various

Fifty years later, the mystery of Paul's fake death still haunts us. Comment: Now, this is a
fascinating one. Here we have a detailed "Mockumentary" with a staggering number of data points
that actually make the whole premise seem completely plausible - not to mention the television
interview with 'McCartney's' ex-wife alluding to a horrific truth hidden from the public for a long
time...
On November 9, 1966, Paul McCartney was prematurely killed, the victim of a bizarre conspiracy theory. In many
ways, the hoax was also the original crazy fan theory.

Fifty years later, we know Paul is definitely alive - and still making music! - but in all the strange lore and mythology
surrounding the Beatles, this theory is probably the most confounding. Heres a brief guide to understanding why Paul was
thought to be dead, why we know he isnt, and why people still care.

The basics are as follows: Some fans thought that the Beatles actively put clues in their albums designed to fuel a
conspiracy theory that McCartney had died in 1966 and was replaced by lookalike actor named William Campbell.

While the conspiracy theory puts Pauls death in 1966, the theory first surfaced on October 12, 1969, one month after the
official (and legally-binding) break-up of the band.

Patient zero of the Paul Is Dead Theory was an American DJ named Russ Gibb of radio station WKNR-FM. Gibb claimed
he got an anonymous phone call saying that Paul McCartney was dead, and actually had been dead for just under three
years.

In a series of very lengthy 1970 interviews for Rolling Stone - later republished as the 1971 book Lennon Remembers -
journalist Jann Wenner asked John Lennon what he thought about the whole conspiracy theory, and John Lennon was
unequivocal:

Thats bullshit. I dont know where that started. Its balmy the whole thing was made up. We wouldnt do
anything like that.
Maybe the fans didnt know the band as well as they thought they did, because they had plenty of evidence. The first piece
was the suggestion that the end of the song Strawberry Fields Forever features John Lennon chanting I buried Paul.

The comprehensive Beatles biography - The Love You Make, written by former Apple Corp. manager Peter Brown and
Steven Gaines - puts it like this: As much as it might have been Johns sentiments at the time, it was hardly true.

And yet, the search for retroactive pieces of evidence backing the theory didnt stop. When fully formed, the theory looked
like this: Paul was killed in a car crash on November 9, 1966. This car crash is referenced in A Day in the Life and more
vaguely in I Am the Walrus.

After this point, Beatles replaced Paul with Campbell, who had won a Paul McCartney lookalike contest. This explains why
the Beatles introduce Billy Shears in the first on track of Sgt. Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band. And if you play the song
Revolution No. 9 from The White Album backwards someone says Turn Me on Dead Man.

Most famously, the cover of Abbey Road presents a funeral procession: John as a priest, Ringo as a pallbearer, George as
a gravedigger, and Paul, of course, as a corpse.

Various photographs were analyzed and retroactively filled with more bits of evidence: A White Album photograph gives us
a scar on Pauls lip that he wasnt supposed to have, and the Sgt. Peppers photos have him looking more ghost-like than
the other Beatles.
As Brown and Gaines explain in The Love You Make:

It seemed as if a Paul-is-dead mini-industry developed overnight. One of the more ghoulish entrepreneurs
published a magazine devoted to the subject.

In 1969, these kinds of fanzines certainly helped to propagate the notion that Paul was dead, something which seems pretty
impossible (at least long-term) with the way information travels on Facebook. Brown specifically asked Paul to tell the press
that he was alive, but Paul declined, wanting to simply let it go and hang out in his farm in Scotland.

I finally called Paul on his private line at the farm and told him that work at Apple was being disrupted by
thousands of queries about his health, Brown writes.

It was in an interview with Life Magazine in which Paul McCartney cleared up once and for all the idea that he was indeed
and in fact alive.

The rumors of my death have been greatly exaggerated, he said. However, if I was dead, Im sure Id be the last
to know

Call it a hoax or a fan theory - the notion that Paul was dead was obviously false - but it was pervasive for one specific
reason: At least one of the clues did seem straight-up weird. In the White Album song Glass Onion, John Lennon sings:
Heres another clue for you all. The Walrus was Paul.

Now, despite containing a great oh yeah (which was sampled by Danger Mouse for the mashup album The Grey Album)
no one would claim Glass Onion as their favorite Beatles song, mostly because its so self-referential and, basically, silly.

And yet, why does John say, Heres another clue if he wasnt at the very least trying to stir up some kind of trouble?
Obviously, Paul wasnt (and still isnt) dead, but Lennon denying that he or any of the the other Beatles didnt know or
understand where this came from in the first place is the part that still seems strange.

Obviously, claiming that Paul was really alive make sense. But denying any involvement in the prank to begin with? Seems
fishy.

So, on this day, celebrate the fact that Paul McCartney is in fact alive. But, consider this: Everyone knows John Lennon was
a witty and surreal humorist. Would he have had the foresight to plant a few Paul Is Dead clues on a few albums, and then,
a few years later phone a radio DJ with the news?

John was in a pretty earnest phase at that point, but, he did hate Paul McCartney in 1969. He even referenced the theory in
his anti-Paul song How Do You Sleep when he sang, Those freaks were right when they said you were dead.

Still, even if Lennon didnt call the radio station (which really, he probably didnt), and we accept it to be true that Gibb did
receive a phone call, who made that phone call and why? In the annuls of weird pop culture mysteries, that question, the
identity of the person who started the rumor, is bizarrely, still haunting.

Paul McCartney / Faul McCartney


This Video addresses the latest hoax revelation, supposedly, from Ringo Starr, that James Paul McCartney really
did die on 9/11/1966, and was replaced by William Shears Campbell.
There may have been some truth to this story but did James Paul McCartney really die?

Paul McCartney Really Is Dead: The Last Testament of George Harrison

In this mockumentary spoof of "Paul-Is-Dead" theories, a mysterious voice on the tape reveals a secret Beatles
history, chronicling McCartney's fatal accident, the cover up, and dozens of unknown clues, exposing "Paul
McCartney" as an impostor!

Highway 61 Entertainment has produced this unauthorized documentary that includes newly unearthed evidence.

The Anti-Trump Protesters Are Tools Of The Oligarchy + Media Attempts To Discredit
Donald Trump Before His Presidency Even Begins
November 13 2016 | From: PaulCraigRoberts / TheSiriusReport / Various

Reform always provokes rage on the part of those who profit by the old order. Arthur M.
Schlesinger, Jr., The Crisis of the Old Order
Who are the anti-Trump protesters besmirching the name of progressives by pretending to be progressives and by
refusing to accept the outcome of the presidential election? They look like, and are acting worse than, the white
trash that they are denouncing.

Related: Anti-Trump Protesters Admit Answering Craigslist Ad and Getting Paid to Protest Trump

I think I know who they are. They are thugs for hire and are paid by the Oligarchy to delegitimize Trumps presidency in the
way that Washington and the German Marshall Fund paid students in Kiev to protest the democratically elected Ukrainian
government in order to prepare the way for a coup.

The organization, change.org, which claims to be a progressive group, but might be a front, along with other
progressive groups, for the Oligarchy, is destroying the reputation of all progressives by circulating a petition that
directs the electors of the Electoral Collage to annul the election by casting their votes for Hillary.

Remember how upset progressives were when Trump said he might not accept the election result if there was evidence that
the vote was rigged? Now progressives are doing what they damned Trump for saying he might do under certain conditions.

The Western presstitutes used the protests in Kiev to delegitimize a democratically elected government and to set it up for a
coup. The protest pay was good enough that non-Ukrainians came from nearby countries to participate in the protest in
order to collect the money.
Related: Ron Paul: Trump Needs To Resist Neocons And Shadow Government Elites

At the time I posted the amounts paid daily to protesters. Reports came in to me from Eastern and Western Europe from
people who were not Ukrainian but were paid to protest as if they were Ukrainians.

The same thing is going on with the Trump protests. CNN reports that for many Americans across the country, Donald
Trumps victory is an outcome they simply refuse to accept. Tens of thousands filled the streets in at least 25 US cities
overnight. This is the exact reporting that the Oligarchy desired from its presstitutes and got.

I hope no one thinks that simultaneous protests in 25 cities were a spontaneous event.

How did 25 independent protests manage to come up with the same slogans and the same signs on the same night
following the election?

What is the point of the protests, and what interest is served by them? As the Romans always asked, who
benefits?
There is only one answer: The Oligarchy and only the Oligarchy benefits.

Trump is a threat to the Oligarchy, because he intends to stop the giveaway of American jobs to foreigners. The jobs
giveaway, sanctified by the neoliberal junk economists as free trade, is one of the main reasons for the 21st century
worsening of the US income distribution.

Money that was formerly paid in middle class wages and salaries to American manufacturing employees and
college graduates has been re-routed to the pockets of the One Percent.

When US corporations move their production of goods and services sold to Americans offshore to Asian countries, such as
China and India, their wage bill falls. The money formerly paid in middle class incomes goes instead into executive bonuses
and dividends and capital gains to shareholders.

The ladders of upward mobility that had made America the land of opportunity were dismantled for the sole purpose of
making a handful of people multi-billionaires.
Trump is a threat to the Oligarchy, because he intends peaceful relations with Russia. In order to replace the profitable
Soviet Threat, the Oligarchy and their neoconservative agents worked overtime to recreate the Russian Threat by
demonizing Russia.

Accustomed to many decades of excess profits from the profitable Cold War, the military/security complex was angry when
President Reagan brought the Cold War to an end. Before these leaches on American taxpayers could get the Cold War
going again, the Soviet Union collapsed as a result of a right-wing coup against Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev.

The military/security complex and their zionist neoconservative agents cooked up the war on terror to keep the money
flowing to the One Percent.

But as hard as the presstitute media worked to create fear of the Muslim threat, even insouciant Americans knew that the
Muslims did not have thousands of ICBMs carrying powerful thermo-nuclear weapons capable of destroying the entirety of
the United States in a few minutes.

Neither did the Muslims have the Red Army capable of overrunning all of Europe in a couple of days. Indeed, the
Muslims havent needed an army. Refugees from Washingtons wars enabled by Europeans are overrunning
Europe.

The excuse for the annual trillion dollar ($1,000 billion ) military/security budget was missing. So the Oligarchy created the
New Hitler in Russia. Hillary was the Oligarchys principle agent for heating up the new Cold War.
Related: Missing CEO Of Clinton Foundation, Eric Braverman Appears To Be In FBI Custody. Missing Arms Dealer
Mark Turi Who Was The Benghazi Fallguy Possibly Dead

Hillary is the tool, enriched by the Oligarchy, whose job as President was to protect and to increase the trillion dollar budget
of the military/security complex. With Hillary in the White House, the looting of the American taxpayers in behalf of the
wealth of the One Percent could go forward unimpeded. But if Trump resolves the Russian threat, the Oligarchy takes an
income hit.

Hillarys job as President was also to privatize Social Security in order that her Wall Street benefactors can rip off
Americans the way that Americans have been ripped off by the insurance companies under Obamacare.

Those Americans who do not pay attention think, mistakenly, that the FBI cleared Hillary of violating National Security
protocols with her email practices. The FBI said that Hillary did violate National Security, but that it was a result of
carelessness or ignorance. She got off from indictment, because the FBI concluded that she did not intentionally violate
National Security protocols.

The investigation of the Clinton Foundation continues.

In other words, in order to protect Hillary the FBI fell back on the ancient common law rule that there can be no crime
without intent. (See PCR and Lawrence Stratton, The Tyranny of Good Intentions.)

One would think that protesters, if they were legitimate, would be celebrating Trumps victory. He, unlike Hillary,
promises to reduce tensions with powerful Russia, and we hope also with China. Unlike Hillary, Trump says he is
concerned with the absence of careers for those very people protesting in the streets of 25 cities against him.
Related: Trump Reveals Policy Goals: "Building That Wall", End "War On Coal", Repeal Obamacare, Dismantle
Dodd-Frank

In other words, the protests against the American people for electing Trump as their president are pointless. The protests
are happening for one reason only. The Oligarchy intends to delegitimize the Trump Presidency. Once President Trump is
delegitimized, it will be easier for the Oligarchy to assassinate him. Unless the Oligarchy can appoint and control Trumps
government, Trump is a prime candidate for assassination.

The protests against Trump are suspicious for another reason. Unlike Hillary, Obama, and George W. Bush, Donald
Trump has not slaughtered and dislocated millions of peoples in seven countries, sending millions of refugees
from the Oligarchys wars to overrun Europe.

Trump earned his fortune, and if by hook or crook, not by selling US government influence to foreign agents as Bill and
Hillary did.

So what are the protesters protesting?

There is no answer except that they are hired to protest. Just as the Maidan protesters in Kiev were hired to protest
by US and German financed NGOs.
The protests in Kiev were equally pointless, because presidential elections were only months away. If Ukrainians really
believed that their president was conspiring with Russia to keep Ukraine from becoming a Western puppet state and wished
to become a puppet state regardless of the costs, the opportunity to vote the government out was at hand.

The only reason for the protests was to orchestrate a coup. The US did succeed in putting their agent in control of the
new Ukrainian government as Victoria Nuland and the US ambassador in Kiev confirmed in their telephone conversation
that is available on the Internet.

The Maidan protests were pointless except for making a coup possible. The protests were without any doubt arranged by
Washington through Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland, a neoconservative brought into the State Department by
Hillary Clinton for the purpose of creating conflict with Russia.

Trump is being protested in order to make him vulnerable in the event he proves to be the threat to the Oligarchy
that he is thought to be.

Trump won the presidency, but the Oligarchy is still in power, which makes any real reforms difficult to achieve. Symbolic
reforms can be the product of the contest between President Trump and the oligarchs.
Related: A 'Deplorable' Speaks Out: "Sorry Snowflake, But It's Not Over"

Karl Marx learned from historical experience, and Lenin, Stalin, and Pol Pot learned from Karl Marx, that change cannot
occur if the displaced ruling class is left intact after a revolution against them.

We have proof of this throughout South America. Every revolution by the indigenous people has left unmolested the Spanish
ruling class, and every revolution has been overthrown by collusion between the ruling class and Washington.

Washington has conspired with traditional elites to remove the elected presidents of Honduras on a number of occasions.
Recently, Washington helped elites evict the female presidents of Argentina and Brazil. The presidents of Venezuela,
Ecuador, and Bolivia are in the crosshairs and are unlikely to survive.

Washington is determined to get its hands on Julian Assange. To achieve this Washington intends to overthrow the
Ecuadoran government that, in defiance of Washington, gave Julian Assange political asylum.
Hugo Chavez

Hugo Chavez had the power to exile or to exterminate the Spanish ruling class in Venezuela when the ruling class
participated in a CIA coup against Chavez. But before the CIA could kill Chavez, the people and the military forced his
release. Instead of punishing the criminals who would have murdered him, Chavez let them go.

According to Marx, Lenin, and Stalin, this is the classic mistake of the revolutionary. To rely on good will from the overthrown
ruling class is the certain road to the defeat of the revolution.

Latin American has proved itself unable to learn this lesson: Revolutions cannot be conciliatory.

Trump is a dealmaker. The Oligarchy can permit him the sheen of success in exchange for no real change. Trump is not
perfect. He might fail on his own. But we should back him on the two most important elements in his program: to reduce
tensions between the major nuclear powers, and to halt Washingtons policy of permitting globalism to destroy Americans
economic prospects.
Comment: While Paul Craig Roberts may have his doubts he should know one thing: Trump knows what is really
going on and he understands that he is up against the Illuminati cabal - and he is very clear on what the stakes are.

If tensions between nuclear powers worsen, we wont be here to worry about other problems. The combination of the
economy hollowed out by globalism and immigration is an economic nightmare. That Trump understands this is reason to
support him.

Note: Some believe that Trump is a ruse conducted by the Oligarchy. However, as Hillary is the bought-and-paid-for
representative of the Oligarchy, such an elaborate ruse is unnecessary.

It is preferable for the Oligarchy to win on its own platform than to install a president on the opposite platform and then
change him around. Another sellout increases the anger of the people. If Hillary had won, the Oligarchy would have had the
voters mandate for their platform.

Related: Insider: Elites Conspiring Against President-Elect Trump

Watch Donald Trump And President Obama Describe Their First Meeting

In a moment that most thought would never happen, Donald Trump and President Obama met for the first time at The White
House on Thursday. The two men described what was apparently a productive meeting.

Media Attempts To Discredit Donald Trump Before His Presidency Even Begins
After Donald Trump was elected president of the United States on November 8th, we started to see
a flood of both mainstream and alternative media sources making all sorts of claims regarding
Trump allegedly, according to advisors or other such sources, eyeing certain people to work for
his administration.

These claims are false and are merely another attempt to discredit Trump and make it seem like he is already acting
in contradiction to things he said during his presidential campaign. This has been confirmed to us through certain
channels.

Related: The Silent Majority Fights Back

Admittedly that sounds equally as vague as what these media sources are claiming, but we would urge to you to just wait
and see what unfolds over the next few months, especially after Trumps inauguration in January 2017.

We have seen mainstream media trying to portray Trump as a racist, a bigot and a sexist and you will see more of this as
they are trying to incite fear and anger in Trumps opponents.

You will also see some alternative media sources trying to convince people that Trump is just another cabal stooge and that
nothing is ever going to change because of this.

Nothing could be further from the truth and in our opinion, the only reason they are doing this is because, quite simply, they
want to keep their jobs. And the only way to do that is to make people fear the almighty cabal, because that is the sort of
rhetoric these sources have been thriving on for years.

They do not like the fact that things are truly changing.
Related: The Clintons and Soros launch Americas Purple Revolution

Again, we would urge you to just sit back and wait until Trump officially takes office and we can deal with the facts, instead
of investing your time and energy in rumours about who supposedly did what and why. The truth will become apparent for all
to see in due course.

We have been saying for well over a year now that Donald Trump would become the next US president, provided they didnt
kill him. Now that he has been officially elected, we are fully confident that Mr. Trump will do what is right. That doesnt mean
that he is a saint and certainly not a saviour, but he is the right man for the job.

However, it is not going to be an easy ride and it is going to take time before he can truly make America great again, so
dont expect miracles. It is likely to get worse before it gets better, specifically in Western nations.

That said, we are certainly on the right path and people around the world are waking up more and more to what is going on
around them and next year we will start to see a lot of political shifts with upcoming elections in European countries.

So let us try and stay grounded and look objectively at the reality that is unfolding. That is the only way to discern
fact from fiction. As the saying goes, cooler heads will prevail!

Related: Craigslist Ad Exposes Paid Anti-Trump Protesters Being Recruited for STAGED Event

Max Keiser: Trump's presidency will be an acid test for US constitution

Donald Trumps presidency will be a fantastic test to see whether the US constitution actually works and a reasonably
intelligent guy with good intentions can appear from the private sector to take the role, said RT host and financial analyst
Max Keiser.

Related Articles:

The Signs Were There: Revenge Of The Forgotten Class


Soros MoveOn Organizes Anti-Trump Protests Around Country

Chelsea Clinton being groomed to run for Congress

Mainstream Media Blames Whitelash For Trumps Victory

"Protester" Propagates Discontent

Obama and Trump Smoke Peace Pipe

We Have Won the Revolution!

Trump called out bigotry of establishment

Commentary: The Unbearable Smugness Of The Press


November 12 2016 | From: CBSNews

The mood in the Washington press corps is bleak, and deservedly so. [Comment: Whilst this
article comes from the heart of the controlled mainstream media, at least they are becoming aware
of the errors of their ways...]

It shouldnt come as a surprise to anyone that, with a few exceptions, we were all tacitly or explicitly #WithHer,
which has led to a certain anguish in the face of Donald Trumps victory.

Related: The Globalization Of Media: A Failing Strike Force

More than that and more importantly, we also missed the story, after having spent months mocking the people who had a
better sense of what was going on.

This is all symptomatic of modern journalisms great moral and intellectual failing: its unbearable smugness. Had Hillary
Clinton won, theres be a winking we did it feeling in the press, a sense that we were brave and called Trump a liar and
saved the republic.

So much for that. The audience for our glib analysis and contempt for much of the electorate, it turned out, was rather
limited. This was particularly true when it came to voters, the ones who turned out by the millions to deliver not only a rebuke
to the political system but also the people who cover it.

Related: Obama Decries 'Wild West' [Independent] Media Landscape

Trump knew what he was doing when he invited his crowds to jeer and hiss the reporters covering him. They hate us, and
have for some time.

And can you blame them? Journalists love mocking Trump supporters. We insult their appearances. We dismiss them as
racists and sexists. We emote on Twitter about how this or that comment or policy makes us feel one way or the other, and
yet we reject their feelings as invalid.

Its a profound failure of empathy in the service of endless posturing. Theres been some sympathy from the press, sure: the
dispatches from heroin country that read like reports from colonial administrators checking in on the natives.

But much of that starts from the assumption that Trump voters are backward, and that its our duty to catalogue and
ultimately reverse that backwardness. What can we do to get these people to stop worshiping their false god and accept our
gospel?

We diagnose them as racists in the way Dark Age clerics confused medical problems with demonic possession. Journalists,
at our worst, see ourselves as a priestly caste. We believe we not only have access to the indisputable facts, but also a
greater truth, a system of beliefs divined from an advanced understanding of justice.
Related: Western Media Credibility In Free Fall Collapse: Case In Point: UN Peace Council: The US Media Is Lying
To The American people. The War In Syria Is Not A Civil War, It's A Proxy Invasion By The United States

Youd think that Trumps victory the one we all discounted too far in advance would lead to a certain newfound humility
in the political press. But of course thats not how it works. To us, speaking broadly, our diagnosis was still basically correct.
The demons were just stronger than we realized.

This is all a whitelash, you see. Trump voters are racist and sexist, so there must be more racists and sexists than we
realized. Tuesday nights outcome was not a logic-driven rejection of a deeply flawed candidate named Clinton; no, it was a
primal scream against fairness, equality, and progress. Let the new tantrums commence!

[Comment: Boy oh boy, do these media whores have a rude awakening coming...]

Thats the fantasy, the idea that if we mock them enough, call them racist enough, theyll eventually shut up and get in line.
Its similar to how media Twitter works, a system where people who dissent from the proper framing of a story are attacked
by mobs of smugly incredulous pundits.

Journalists exist primarily in a world where people can get shouted down and disappear, which informs our attitudes toward
all disagreement.
Related: Who Owns New Zealand's Media?

Journalists increasingly dont even believe in the possibility of reasoned disagreement, and as such ascribe cynical motives
to those who think about things a different way. We see this in the ongoing veneration of facts, the ones peddled by
explainer websites and data journalists who believe themselves to be curiously post-ideological.

That the explainers and data journalists so frequently get things hilariously wrong never invites the soul-searching youd
think it would. Instead, it all just somehow leads us to more smugness, more meanness, more certainty from the reporters
and pundits. Faced with defeat, we retreat further into our bubble, assumptions left unchecked. No, its the voters who are
wrong.

As a direct result, we get it wrong with greater frequency. Out on the road, we forget to ask the right questions. We cant
even imagine the right question. We go into assignments too certain that what we find will serve to justify our biases.

The publics estimation of the press declines even further -- fewer than one-in-three Americans trust the press, per Gallup -
which starts the cycle anew.
Related: Putin Begs Media To Wake Up + The Demonization Of Vladimir Putin

Theres a place for opinionated journalism; in fact, its vital. But our causal, profession-wide smugness and protestations of
superiority are making us unable to do it well.

Our theme now should be humility. We must become more impartial, not less so. We have to abandon our easy
culture of tantrums and recrimination. We have to stop writing these know-it-all, 140-character sermons on social
media and admit that, as a class, journalists have a shamefully limited understanding of the country we cover.

Whats worse, we dont make much of an effort to really understand, and with too few exceptions, treat the economic
grievances of Middle America like theyre some sort of punchline.

Sometimes quite literally so, such as when reporters tweet out a photo of racist-looking Trump supporters and jokingly
suggest that they must be upset about free trade or low wages.

We have to fix this, and the broken reasoning behind it. Theres a fleeting fun to gang-ups and groupthink. But its not worth
what we are losing in the process.

Related: Mainstream Media Achieve Historic Milestone + Trust This: New Zealanders Don't Trust MPs, Bloggers,
The Media

New Zealand Government Has Pledged Millions Of Dollars Worth Of Taxpayer Funds
To The Corrupt Clinton Foundation & Clinton Health Access Initiatives
November 6 2016 | From: NationalBusinessReview / WakeUpNZ

The New Zealand government will continue supporting the Clinton Foundation's flagship project
by donating a further $6 million despite a new wave of recent controversy surrounding the
charitable organisation.
Question: WHY is John Key sending our money to a knowingly corrupt operation? Does this make him complicit in
the ongoing fraudulent machinations of the Clinton related criminal Cabal activities? Does he even have any choice
at this juncture? And what the hell will happen to John Key when this whole farce comes falling down given the
mathematical certainty of just that outcome?

Related: Clinton Charities Raked in Millions of Taxpayer Dollars

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT) tells NBR it has "no intention to further review our support for the Clinton
Health Access Initiative (CHAI)."

CHAI began as an initiative under the Clinton Foundation but has since been separated out to a non-profit organisation with
a focus on reducing the cost of HIV/AIDS medicine in sub-Saharan Africa.

CHAI accounts for almost two-thirds of the Clinton Foundation's annual income and expense according to online disclosures
and was, until recently, vice-chaired by Chelsea Clinton with former US President Bill Clinton serving as a board member.

Following political pressure, CHAI released a list of all of its donors from the past six years, along with how much they had
donated in August.
Related: Wikileaks Confirms Hillary Sold Weapons To ISIS + Wikileaks Will Release More Emails On The Clinton
Foundation FBI Has Enough Evidence To Indict

It turns out, MFAT was on the list and near the top alongside the likes of the World Health Organisation, Save the Children
and the Rockefeller Foundation, which all donated between &US1-5 million. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation was one
of CHAI's biggest donors, along with the Australian government, which donated more than $US25 million to the
organisation.

MFAT says it has donated to the CHAI since 2013 through New Zealand's Aid Programme.

The programme has been providing funding and technological assistance for the agriculture-strengthening component of a
project in Rwanda and Ethiopia.

MFAT had an original budget of $13.7 million to distribute to CHAI, of which $7.7 million has been distributed to date, with a
further $6 million remaining. It has a $1.7 billion budget over three years, of which most will be delivered through
international organisations such as CHAI, an MFAT spokesman says.
MFAT's only support for CHAI has been through the funding of a project that aims to significantly reduce child malnutrition
and raise incomes in Rwanda and Ethiopia, he says.

In Hot Water

CHAI has recently found itself at the centre of controversy in the US. US presidential candidate Hillary Clinton as been
forced to defend the Clinton Foundation on her campaign trail, following accusations by her Republican rival Donald Trump,
along with other Republicans, that wealthy donors may be expecting favourable treatment from the US Government.

Although Mrs Clinton denies this, the foundation last month revealed that it will no longer receive donations from foreigners
to corporations if Mrs Clinton won the race for the White House. But the organisation made no mention of CHAI at the time.

After weeks of speculation, in early September a CHAI spokeswoman announced that the initiative would take steps to
sever ties with the Clinton family and if Mrs Clinton is elected president and would spin CHAI into a "completely
independent" charity.

Clinton Health Access Initiative, Inc.

Cumulative Donations By Donor (January 2010 to June 2016)

Funding Ranges: (in Donor's Name:


$USD)

1. Above $25 Million Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Global Affairs Canada, Ikea Foundation, Norwegian
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Australian Government, ELMA Foundation, UK Department
for International Development, UNITAID

2. $10 Million to $25 Million Children's Investment Fund Foundation, Swedish International Development
Cooperation Agency

3. $5 Million to $10 Million Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Foundation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC), Elton John AIDS Foundation, Embassy of Ireland, New Zealand Ministry of
Foreign Affairs and Trade, Sheik Mohammed Hussein Ali Al Amoudi, STOP AIDS
NOW, United Nations Children's Fund, World Health Organisation

Related: The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Exposed

But CHAI does not plan on implementing restrictions on where it can raise money - meaning it can still accept donations
from New Zealand.

The controversy did not stop there. Just weeks after CHAI's decision, US Republican Congresswoman Marsha Blackburn
released a 17-page report slamming CHAI's "self-serving" philanthropy in sub-Saharan Africa.

The report, titled: The Clinton Foundation and the "India Success Story: Self-serving philanthropy, watered down drugs and
money in sub-Saharan Africa, alleges the Clinton Foundation "likely facilitated the distribution of watered-down HIV/AIDS
medications in sub-Saharan Africa through it's Health Access Initiative [CHAI].

The report scrutinises the relationship the relationship between CHAI and Indian pharmaceutical company Ranbaxy, which
partnered with the initiative in 2003, working with CHAI to combat HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa. Ranbaxy Laboratories,
now owned by Sun Pharma, is a multinational pharmaceutical company.

Related: Bill Gates And George Soros Fund Monsanto And A World Depopulation Agenda

One of CHAI's main roles is to bring together buyers of antiretroviral drugs used to fight HIV/AIDS, such as governments,
non-profits and multilateral aid organisations, with sellers such as Ranbaxy.

The initiative has, by most accounts been successful in bringing down the price of the lifesaving drugs and has been
welcomed by the global community. But Ranbaxy has run into problems with US regulators.

Ms Blackburn's report says a former employee of the company turned whistleblower, Dinesh Thakur, confirmed the
company's HIV/AIDs antiretrovirals were adulterated.

The US government took Ranbaxy to court in 2007 resulting in the company pleading guilty to seven felonies and paying a
half billion dollar fine in 2013.
Related: Hillary Clintons Relationship With The Rothschild / Rockefeller Establishment Is Now On Full Display

Ms Blackburn also suggests the adulterated drugs may have "increased patient mortality rates" in the region.

MFAT won't comment on the report but says its funding is focused on providing technical assistance for agriculture-
strengthening components of projects in Rwanda and Ethiopia, as well as working with local farmers to aid in the
development of factories to produce food.

Comment: Horse shit. This is a PR spin - once the money is released to the Clinton Foundation, MFAT and the New
Zealand government have NO IDEA as to what use they are put. Then again, they very may well know all too well.

Related: Indian Doctors Sue Bill Gates For Harming Children With Deadly 'Humanitarian' Vaccines + Dr. Robert
Rowen Reveals The Raw Truth About Vaccines At The Vaccine World Summit

$13.7 Million Dollars Of New Zealand Taxpayer Funds Pledged To Shady Clinton
Charity

It has been revealed that millions of New Zealand taxpayer dollars have been donated by
the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT) to Hillary Clintons charity, the Clinton Health
Access Initiative (CHAI), a non-profit organisation created from the Clinton Foundation with the
stated goal to reduce HIV/AIDs in Africa.
An MFAT spokesman confirmed to the NBR that between January 2010 and June 2016, $7.7 million of taxpayer
funds had already been donated and another $6 million was to follow, keeping to a pledge to donate $13.7 million
made by the government organisation in 2013.

Related: Prime Minster John Key caught channeling millions of dollars of taxpayer's money to 'ethically
compromised' Clinton Foundation

ACT party member David Seymour commented:

In a world where New Zealanders can crowdsource to buy a beach, its not clear what role there is for the
government to collect taxes and contribute it to a global charity which is more than capable of reaching out and
raising its own money.

The big question is, why is our government sending millions of dollars overseas while at the same time cutting funding for
crucial services which desperately need the money here in New Zealand?

To fully understand how Clinton charities operate and decide whether a single taxpayer dollar should have been donated,
we first need to look at some of the controversies.

Over the past 15 years, the Washington Post can reveal the charities have raised over $2 billion dollars, mainly from big
corporates, foreign governments and political donors. Many have called the contributions pay for play, where powerful
donors exchange funds for future political favours.

Speeches make up a large part of the revenue stream, with the Clintons earning hundreds of thousands per speech from
the likes of big Wall Street banks including Goldman Sachs as revealed by WikiLeaks.
Related: The Clinton Chronicles

Hacked emails also released by WikiLeaks revealed that in 2012, Qatar pledged to donate US $1 million to the Clinton
Foundation raising a question of ethics after Hillary promised that while she was serving as secretary of the state donations
from foreign governments would no longer be accepted due to the potential influence on foreign policy.

It was also been revealed the Clinton charities utilised the devastating Haiti earthquake to implement disaster capitalism,
funneling funds into Haiti under the pretense of aid but only for the funds to flow away from the Haitians desperately in need
and instead to companies who had made previously large donations to the Clinton Foundation.

Then there is the $145 million pay for play contributions made to the Clinton Foundation by shareholders of Canadian
company Uranium One, a mining company with concessions in Kazakhstan and the US.

Uranium One sought to sell these concessions to the Russians, but the deal had to be approved by a government
committee due to the implications to national security.
Related: Criminal Roots: A Shocking Expos On The Clinton Family And Their Rise To Power

In return for the contributions and the extra $500,000 Bill Clinton received in speaking fees from a Russian investment bank,
the 20% purchase of US uranium assets by the Russians was approved, knowing this purchase would mean the production
of more nuclear weapons against Americas own interests.

The Clinton Health Access Initiative has also had its share of controversy.

US Congresswoman Marsha Blackburn recently released a 71 page report which slammed CHAIs self-serving
philanthropy in Africa, after the charity was found distributing watered down HIV/AIDS medications to sick Africans.

According to the report, these cheaper drugs which were provided by Ranbaxy Laboratories:

Subjected patients to increased risks of morbidity and mortality.

Ranbaxy later was found guilty of selling badly made generic drugs and fined a record US$500 million.
Related: Leaked DNC Emails Prove Once And For All That The Conspiracy Theorists Were Right All Along + FBI
Source: Clinton Foundation Can Bring Down Entire Government

If Hillary is elected president, she has committed to changing how the Clinton Foundation operates. Bill Clinton has said:

The Foundation will accept contributions only from U.S. citizens, permanent residents, and U.S.- based
independent foundations, whose names we will continue to make public on a quarterly basis. And we will change
the official name from the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation to the Clinton Foundation. While I will continue
to support the work of the Foundation, I will step down from the Board and will no longer raise funds for it.

However, CHAI, which receives around 60% of the funds from the Clinton Foundation, has yet to decide whether it will also
refuse foreign government donations if she was to win, and when asked for comment on CHAI the Clinton campaign
spokesman declined.

Theres no doubt the Clinton charities have done some incredible work overseas through CHAI, but the manner in which
these charities are utilised as vehicles for personal benefit can not be ignored.

With strong financial ties to Wall Street, big pharmaceuticals and other large corporate sponsors, its clear the charities are
being used as avenues to channel funds under the guise of philanthropy.

What is of great concern here in New Zealand is the level of taxpayer funded donations made to Hillarys charity without
public knowledge, and how quiet the mainstream media has been about it.
John Key and the National Party clearly have no issue using millions of taxpayer funds as bribes, revealed by the
corrupt Saudi sheep deal, so it should be of no surprise to see the government fund a shady charity found to be
acting only for self serving interests.

We need to hold our government accountable for where taxpayer funds are being applied, especially when gifted to charities
operated by corrupt American political figureheads.

Our country currently can not afford to be sending millions of dollars overseas. Instead of donating the remaining $6 million
pledged to CHAI, we demand that MFAT reallocate the funds within New Zealand to help assist those struggling under our
poverty and homelessness crisis.
For an excellent review of the Clinton Foundation, please have a read through the Washington Posts
feature Inside the Clinton Donor Network.

We also highly recommend watching the in-depth documentary Clinton Cash, which discusses the pay for play model and
resulting corruption which can be viewed here.

Putins Compelling Exposure Of The Egregious Lawless Behaviour Of The Western


Dark Cabal In The Wake Of The True Revolution Of The Masses
November 5 2016 | From: StankovUniversalLaw / Kremlin / Various

Speech at the Valdai International Discussion Club, October 27, 2016.


President of Russia Vladimir Putin:

Related: Vladimir Putins Third Way: As Seen Through the Nooscope

Tarja, Heinz, Thabo, colleagues, ladies and gentlemen,

It is a great pleasure to see you again. I want to start by thanking all of the participants in the Valdai International Discussion
Club, from Russia and abroad, for your constructive part in this work, and I want to thank our distinguished guests for their
readiness to take part in this open discussion.

Our esteemed moderator just wished me a good departure into retirement, and I wish myself the same when the time
comes. This is the right approach and the thing to do. But I am not retired yet and am for now the leader of this big country.
As such, it is fitting to show restraint and avoid displays of excessive aggressiveness. I do not think that this is my style
in any case.

But I do think that we should be frank with each other, particularly here in this gathering. I think we should hold candid, open
discussions, otherwise our dialogue makes no sense and would be insipid and without the slightest interest.

I think that this style of discussion is extremely needed today given the great changes taking place in the world. The theme
for our meeting this year, The Future in Progress: Shaping the World of Tomorrow, is very topical.
Related: Can The American People Defeat The Oligarchy That Rules Them?

Last year, the Valdai forum participants discussed the problems with the current world order. Unfortunately, little has
changed for the better over these last months. Indeed, it would be more honest to say that nothing has changed.

The tensions engendered by shifts in distribution of economic and political influence continue to grow. Mutual distrust
creates a burden that narrows our possibilities for finding effective responses to the real threats and challenges facing
the world today.

Essentially, the entire globalisation project is in crisis today and in Europe, as we know well, we hear voices now saying that
multiculturalism has failed.

I think this situation is in many respects the result of mistaken, hasty and to some extent over-confident choices made
by some countries elites a quarter-of-a-century ago. Back then, in the late 1980s-early 1990s, there was a chance not just
to accelerate the globalisation process but also to give it a different quality and make it more harmonious and sustainable
in nature.

But some countries that saw themselves as victors in the Cold War, not just saw themselves this way but said it
openly, took the course of simply reshaping the global political and economic order to fit their own interests.

In their euphoria, they essentially abandoned substantive and equal dialogue with other actors in international life, chose
not to improve or create universal institutions, and attempted instead to bring the entire world under the spread
of their own organisations, norms and rules.
They chose the road of globalisation and security for their own beloved selves, for the select few, and not for all. But far from
everyone was ready to agree with this.

We may as well be frank here, as we know full well that many did not agree with what was happening, but some were
unable by then to respond, and others were not yet ready to respond.

The result though is that the system of international relations is in a feverish state and the global economy cannot extricate
itself from systemic crisis. At the same time, rules and principles, in the economy and in politics, are constantly being
distorted and we often see what only yesterday was taken as a truth and raised to dogma status reversed completely.

If the powers that be today find some standard or norm to their advantage, they force everyone else to comply.

But if tomorrow these same standards get in their way, they are swift to throw them in the bin, declare them
obsolete, and set or try to set new rules.
Thus, we saw the decisions to launch airstrikes in the centre of Europe, against Belgrade, and then came Iraq, and then
Libya. The operations in Afghanistan also started without the corresponding decision from the United Nations Security
Council.

In their desire to shift the strategic balance in their favour these countries broke apart the international legal framework that
prohibited deployment of new missile defence systems.

They created and armed terrorist groups, whose cruel actions have sent millions of civilians into flight, made
millions of displaced persons and immigrants, and plunged entire regions into chaos.

We see how free trade is being sacrificed and countries use sanctions as a means of political pressure, bypass the World
Trade Organisation and attempt to establish closed economic alliances with strict rules and barriers, in which the main
beneficiaries are their own transnational corporations.
And we know this is happening. They see that they cannot resolve all of the problems within the WTO framework and so
think, why not throw the rules and the organisation itself aside and build a new one instead. This illustrates what I just said.

At the same time, some of our partners demonstrate no desire to resolve the real international problems in the world today.

In organisations such as NATO, for example, established during the Cold War and clearly out of date today, despite
all the talk about the need to adapt to the new reality, no real adaptation takes place.

We see constant attempts to turn the OSCE, a crucial mechanism for ensuring common European and also trans-Atlantic
security, into an instrument in the service of someones foreign policy interests. The result is that this very important
organisation has been hollowed out.

But they continue to churn out threats, imaginary and mythical threats such as the Russian military threat.
Related: Hillary Clintons Strategic Ambition In A Nutshell. Regime Change in Russia Putin is an Obstacle

This is a profitable business that can be used to pump new money into defence budgets at home, get allies to bend
to a single superpowers interests, expand NATO and bring its infrastructure, military units and arms closer to our borders.

Of course, it can be a pleasing and even profitable task to portray oneself as the defender of civilisation against the new
barbarians. The only thing is that Russia has no intention of attacking anyone.

This is all quite absurd. I also read analytical materials, those written by you here today, and by your colleagues
in the USA and Europe.

It is unthinkable, foolish and completely unrealistic. Europe alone has 300 million people. All of the NATO members
together with the USA have a total population of 600 million, probably.

Putin Warns Americans: You're Being Distracted!


Of all the internal problems the Presidential candidates could solve - Clinton harps on about "Russian aggression"
and mainstream media goes into Russophobic overdrive.

But Russia has only 146 million. It is simply absurd to even conceive such thoughts. And yet they use these ideas in pursuit
of their political aims.

Another mythical and imaginary problem is what I can only call the hysteria the USA has whipped up over supposed
Russian meddling in the American presidential election.

The United States has plenty of genuinely urgent problems, it would seem, from the colossal public debt to the increase
in firearms violence and cases of arbitrary action by the police.
You would think that the election debates would concentrate on these and other unresolved problems, but the elite
has nothing with which to reassure society, it seems, and therefore attempt to distract public attention by pointing
instead to supposed Russian hackers, spies, agents of influence and so forth.

I have to ask myself and ask you too: Does anyone seriously imagine that Russia can somehow influence the American
peoples choice? America is not some kind of banana republic, after all, but is a great power. Do correct me if I am wrong.

Putin expressed hopes that a new US president will work with him to rectify the dangerous deterioration in relations between
the US and Russia. Obviously, this cannot happen if the new president is Hillary.

Related: President Putin Asks US To Stop Provoking Russia

The question is, if things continue in this vein, what awaits the world? What kind of world will we have tomorrow? Do we
have answers to the questions of how to ensure stability, security and sustainable economic growth? Do we know how we
will make a more prosperous world?

Sad as it is to say, there is no consensus on these issues in the world today. Maybe you have come to some common
conclusions through your discussions, and I would, of course, be interested to hear them.

But it is very clear that there is a lack of strategy and ideas for the future. This creates a climate of uncertainty that has
a direct impact on the public mood.

Sociological studies conducted around the world show that people in different countries and on different continents tend
to see the future as murky and bleak. This is sad. The future does not entice them, but frightens them. At the same time,
people see no real opportunities or means for changing anything, influencing events and shaping policy.

Yes, formally speaking, modern countries have all the attributes of democracy: Elections, freedom of speech, access
to information, freedom of expression. But even in the most advanced democracies the majority of citizens have no
real influence on the political process and no direct and real influence on power.
People sense an ever-growing gap between their interests and the elites vision of the only correct course, a course
the elite itself chooses.

The result is that referendums and elections increasingly often create surprises for the authorities.

People do not at all vote as the official and respectable media outlets advised them to, nor as the mainstream parties
advised them to. Public movements that only recently were too far left or too far right are taking centre stage and pushing
the political heavyweights aside.

At first, these inconvenient results were hastily declared anomaly or chance. But when they became more frequent, people
started saying that society does not understand those at the summit of power and has not yet matured sufficiently to be able
to assess the authorities labour for the public good.

Or they sink into hysteria and declare it the result of foreign, usually Russian, propaganda.

Friends and colleagues, I would like to have such a propaganda machine here in Russia, but regrettably, this is not
the case. We have not even global mass media outlets of the likes of CNN, BBC and others. We simply do not have this
kind of capability yet.
As for the claim that the fringe and populists have defeated the sensible, sober and responsible minority - we are
not talking about populists or anything like that but about ordinary people, ordinary citizens who are losing trust
in the ruling class. That is the problem.

By the way, with the political agenda already eviscerated as it is, and with elections ceasing to be an instrument for change
but consisting instead of nothing but scandals and digging up dirt who gave someone a pinch, who sleeps with whom, if
youll excuse me.

This just goes beyond all boundaries. And honestly, a look at various candidates platforms gives the impression that they
were made from the same mould the difference is slight, if there is any.

It seems as if the elites do not see the deepening stratification in society and the erosion of the middle class, while
at the same time, they implant ideological ideas that, in my opinion, are destructive to cultural and national identity.

And in certain cases, in some countries they subvert national interests and renounce sovereignty in exchange
for the favour of the suzerain.
This begs the question: who is actually the fringe? The expanding class of the supranational oligarchy
and bureaucracy, which is in fact often not elected and not controlled by society, or the majority of citizens, who
want simple and plain things stability, free development of their countries, prospects for their lives and the lives
of their children, preserving their cultural identity, and, finally, basic security for themselves and their loved ones.

People are clearly scared to see how terrorism is evolving from a distant threat to an everyday one, how a terrorist attack
could occur right near them, on the next street, if not on their own street, while any makeshift item from a home-made
explosive to an ordinary truck can be used to carry out a mass killing.

Moreover, the terrorist attacks that have taken place in the past few years in Boston and other US cities, Paris, Brussels,
Nice and German cities, as well as, sadly, in our own country, show that terrorists do not need units or organised
structures they can act independently, on their own, they just need the ideological motivation against their enemies, that is,
against you and us.
The terrorist threat is a clear example of how people fail to adequately evaluate the nature and causes of the growing
threats. We see this in the way events in Syria are developing. No one has succeeded in stopping the bloodshed
and launching a political settlement process.

One would think that we would have begun to put together a common front against terrorism now, after such
lengthy negotiations, enormous effort and difficult compromises.

But this has not happened and this common front has not emerged. My personal agreements with the President
of the United States have not produced results either.

There were people in Washington ready to do everything possible to prevent these agreements from being
implemented in practice.

This all demonstrates an unexplainable and I would say irrational desire on the part of the Western countries to keep making
the same mistakes or, as we say here in Russia, keep stepping on the same rake.

We all see what is happening in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and a number of other countries. I have to ask, where are
the results of the fight against terrorism and extremism? Overall, looking at the world as a whole, there are some results
in particular regions and locations, but there is no global result and the terrorist threat continues to grow.

We all remember the euphoria in some capitals over the Arab Spring. Where are these fanfares today?

Russias calls for a joint fight against terrorism go ignored. Whats more, they continue to arm, supply and train
terrorist groups in the hope of using them to achieve their own political aims.
Related: Hillary Clinton embraces George Soros radical vision of open-border world

This is a very dangerous game and I address the players once again: The extremists in this case are more cunning, clever
and stronger than you, and if you play these games with them, you will always lose.

Colleagues, it is clear that the international community should concentrate on the real problems facing humanity today,
the resolution of which will make our world a safer and more stable place and make the system of international relations
fairer and more equal.

As I said, it is essential to transform globalisation from something for a select few into something for all. It is my firm belief
that we can overcome these threats and challenges only by working together on the solid foundation of international law
and the United Nations Charter.

Today it is the United Nations that continues to remain an agency that is unparalleled in representativeness and universality,
a unique venue for equitable dialogue. Its universal rules are necessary for including as many countries as possible
in economic and humanitarian integration, guaranteeing their political responsibility and working to coordinate their actions
while also preserving their sovereignty and development models.

The NSA leaked the DNC emails because they hate Hillary - Judge Napolitano

Related: Assange: WikiLeaks did not receive Clinton emails from Russian govt

We have no doubt that sovereignty is the central notion of the entire system of international relations. Respect for it and its
consolidation will help underwrite peace and stability both at the national and international levels.

There are many countries that can rely on a history stretching back a thousand years, like Russia, and we have come
to appreciate our identity, freedom and independence.

But we do not seek global domination, expansion or confrontation with anyone.

In our mind, real leadership lies in seeing real problems rather than attempting to invent mythical threats and use
them to steamroll others.

This is exactly how Russia understands its role in global affairs today.

There are priorities without which a prosperous future for our shared planet is unthinkable and they are absolutely obvious.
I wont be saying anything new here.

First of all, there is equal and indivisible security for all states. Only after ending armed conflicts and ensuring the peaceful
development of all countries will we be able to talk about economic progress and the resolution of social, humanitarian
and other key problems.

It is important to fight terrorism and extremism in actuality. It has been said more than once that this evil can only be
overcome by a concerted effort of all states of the world. Russia continues to offer this to all interested partners.

It is necessary to add to the international agenda the issue of restoring the Middle Eastern countries lasting statehood,
economy and social sphere.

The mammoth scale of destruction demands drawing up a long-term comprehensive programme, a kind of Marshall Plan,
to revive the war- and conflict-ridden area. Russia is certainly willing to join actively in these team efforts.

We cannot achieve global stability unless we guarantee global economic progress. It is essential to provide
conditions for creative labour and economic growth at a pace that would put an end to the division of the world into
permanent winners and permanent losers.
The rules of the game should give the developing economies at least a chance to catch up with those we know
as developed economies.

We should work to level out the pace of economic development, and brace up backward countries and regions so
as to make the fruit of economic growth and technological progress accessible to all.

Particularly, this would help to put an end to poverty, one of the worst contemporary problems.

It is also absolutely evident that economic cooperation should be mutually lucrative and rest on universal principles
to enable every country to become an equal partner in global economic activities.

True, the regionalising trend in the world economy is likely to persist in the medium term. However, regional trade
agreements should complement and expand not replace the universal norms and regulations.

Russia advocates the harmonisation of regional economic formats based on the principles of transparency and respect
for each others interests. That is how we arrange the work of the Eurasian Economic Union and conduct negotiations with
our partners, particularly on coordination with the Silk Road Economic Belt project, which China is implementing.
We expect it to promote an extensive Eurasian partnership, which promises to evolve into one of the formative centres
of a vast Eurasian integration area. To implement this idea, 5+1 talks have begun already for an agreement on trade
and economic cooperation between all participants in the process.

An important task of ours is to develop human potential. Only a world with ample opportunities for all, with highly skilled
workers, access to knowledge and a great variety of ways to realise their potential can be considered truly free.

Only a world where people from different countries do not struggle to survive but lead full lives can be stable.

A decent future is impossible without environment protection and addressing climate problems. That is why the conservation
of the natural world and its diversity and reducing the human impact on the environment will be a priority for the coming
decades.
Another priority is global healthcare. Of course, there are many problems, such as large-scale epidemics, decreasing
the mortality rate in some regions and the like. So there is enormous room for advancement.

All people in the world, not only the elite, should have the right to healthy, long and full lives.

This is a noble goal. In short, we should build the foundation for the future world today by investing in all priority areas
of human development.

And of course, it is necessary to continue a broad-based discussion of our common future so that all sensible
and promising initiatives are heard.

Colleagues, ladies and gentlemen, I am confident that you, as members of the Valdai Club, will actively take part in this
work.
Your expertise enables you to understand all angles of the processes underway both in Russia and in the world, forecast
and evaluate long-term trends, and put forward new initiatives and recommendations that will help us find the way
to the more prosperous and sustainable future that we all badly need.

Thank you very much for your attention.

Video Version of Full Speech:

Addendum:

Media comments on Putins Valdai Speech:

Putin takes part in Valdai clubs final session (LIVE UPDATES) - RT

Vladimir Putin Addresses 13th Annual Valdai Discussion Club (VIDEO) - Sputnik

Putin says Russia showing restraint in Syria but patience may run out - Reuters

Putin says Russia has no option but to clear Aleppo of militants - Reuters

Putin urges new Marshall Plan for Middle East to see recovery and growth - TASS

Putin says Russia does not plan to get militarily involved in Iraq, Libya - Reuters

Russia threat exaggerated by West to justify military spending Putin - SKY News

Putin: Russia is not going to attack anyone - TASS

Putin is sure Russia and Ukraine will find way to end crisis - TASS

Russias Putin says cyber attacks are unacceptable - Reuters

Putin urges US not to provoke Russia to actively protect national interests - TASS
Calling Trump Moscows favorite is nonsense created by media - Putin - RT

Putin says U.S. hysteria over Russia is election ploy - Reuters

Putin rejects claims of Russian interference in US election - AP

Russias Putin says Trump behaves extravagantly to get message across - Reuters

Russias Putin says Obama administration does not stick to any deals - Reuters

Counter-Coup: US Intelligence Joins With WikiLeaks To Put Down The Criminal


Cabal Seeking To Extend Control Over US Government + Hillary Clinton Goes Full Tin
Foil Hat
November 4 2016 | From: StevePieczenik / NaturalNews / Infowars / Various

We are watching history unfold before us with such sound and fury that we are likely to never
witness comparable events again in our lifetime.

As of today, I am now convinced that the deep state has turned on Hillary Clinton and will unveil damning evidence
in the next few days that will end the Clintons' reign of terror over America and collapse her bid for the presidency.

Related: Mutiny At The FBI: Comey warned by his own agents to indict Clinton or watch the FBI's reputation go
down in flames

The mainstream media, of course, will never report this news for the simple reason that they are the propaganda arm of the
criminal Clinton cartel. As such, they will lie to the public to the bitter end, even as the Clinton Titanic sinks with all of them
on board (in deep, frigid waters, no less, with no more lifeboats to be found).

The so-called "deep state" - the powerful insiders who really run the intelligence services and inner layers of untouchable
bureaucracy - has decided Hillary Clinton is too damaged to defend any longer.

Even if she were to win by stealing the election, she would be so mired in criminal investigations and political illegitimacy
that she would rip the nation to shreds while fighting for her own political survival.
It has now been decided, I believe, that Hillary Clinton will be taken out of power by releasing criminally damaging emails
which have long been held by the NSA and FBI.

[Note: Remember, this article represents just one line of observation in terms of how this could play out - however
the video below denotes actions that are already in play.]

Related: Unprecedented Crisis, Collapse of the Clinton Apparatus? Hacker Whistleblowers, Trump, and the FBI
Converge

This will likely happen before the coming weekend. Once that is accomplished, the next goal will be to wait for President
Trump to take office, then destroy the U.S. economy through a controlled, global debt collapse so that Trump can be
blamed for the near collapse of western economies.

(Remember: The deep state isn't pro-Trump. They're still all about defending the establishment. But Hillary is one
bridge too far for even the statists to stomach...)

Instead of allowing Hillary Clinton to take power and destroy America from the top, in other words, deep state power brokers
have reverted to "Plan B" which is to let Trump take the White House, then destroy America through the controlled
demolition of its currency and economy.

This is simpler than it sounds. Bringing down the debt pyramid of a nation carrying nearly $20 trillion in national debt isn't
exactly rocket science. All they have to do is stand back and stop manipulating the markets and stop printing new money for
a few months while raising interest rates. Monetary gravity will do the rest...
In the mean time, Hillary Clinton and a long list of her co-conspirators are going to find themselves charged
with obstruction of justice, lying under oath, destruction of evidence, conspiracy, corruption and other serious charges that
will lead to serious prison time for many.

The criminal racket of the Clintons is about to implode. The participants will be charged under the RICO Act for
"racketeering" activities, for which ample evidence already exists.

A New Video from Steve Pieczenik Describes Some of This

In this video, intelligence insider Steve Pieczenik lays out how high-level intelligence insiders are now working in concert to
"reverse the Clinton coup" that's attempting to take over America and destroy it from within.

Even if you don't believe Pieczenik - and I fully realize he's controversial in his own way - this short video is a very
important "must watch" explanation to know what people in the intelligence community are doing... "we've initiated a
counter-coup..."

Steve Pieczenik was Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under Henry Kissinger, Cyrus Vance and James
Baker. His expertise includes foreign policy, international crisis management and psychological warfare.

He served the presidential administrations of Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan and George H.W.
Bush in the capacity of deputy assistant secretary.

As we constantly emphasize, 95% of those working for the US Government are good people trapped in a
bad system. A tipping point appears to have been reached in which these good people are now saying to
the corrupt political class: ENOUGH!
The Clintons are Going to Go "Full Murder" In a Last Ditch, Desperate Effort to Save Themselves

Beware of what may yet unfold in the coming days. Like a cornered wild animal, the Clintons are extremely dangerous when
they realize they have nothing to lose by going "full murder" in an attempt to save themselves.

I will not be surprised the least bit if bodies of people in high places start piling up over the next week. Watch for news
reports of mysterious car crashes, swimming pool accidents or "natural" deaths involving people like James Comey, who'd
better have armed security personnel around him at all times.

Related: Hillary Admits In Leaked Email That Clinton Donors Are Funding ISIS

Look for desperate measures such as the Clintons attempting to blackmail Obama, Comey or anyone who they think might
serve as leverage to save their own skins. We might also see desperate false flag attacks unfold in the next few days,
although that's increasingly unlikely since it seems the Clintons are now on their own (they would need the assistance of
Obama to pull off another Sandy Hook, you see).

A Deal has Already Been Struck With Obama

Most likely, deep state operatives have already struck a deal with Obama to avoid prosecuting him for his own serious
crimes as long as he stays out of the way as Hillary Clinton's head is served up on a platter.

This likely explains why Obama is now publicly saying he trusts Comey (and refuses to go to bat for Hillary). There's no love
lost between Obama and the Clintons (remember 2008?).

As all this is going down, the propaganda ministry of the Clinton regime - CNN, NYT, Washington Post, etc. - is going to
explode into an all-out "bat-s##t crazy" conspiracy theory phase where they blame the Russians, extraterrestrials, Bigfoot
and the Loch Ness Monster for everything that's imploding around the Clintons.
Related: The Failure of Democracy, How The Oligarchs Plan To Steal The Election

Mainstream media news reports are going to increasingly sound like sociopathic babble from crazy people grasping at
whatever outlandish theories they can invoke. Maybe crop circles were created by the Russians as a secret code to
Wikileaks and Donald Trump, eh?

Meanwhile, conspiratorial operatives like George Stephanopoulos fully realize they are probably going to jail for
collusion and sedition, so they have nothing left to lose by desperately trying to put Hillary in the White House via any
means at their disposal, including totally faking negative news against Donald Trump (which is, of course, the entire news
mission of CNN at this point, a disgraced propaganda network run by anti-American traitors).

If the Vote is Stolen for Hillary Clinton, All Hell Breaks Loose

Should the globalist Soros operators manage to steal the vote, bribe the electoral voters or rig the black box voting
machines sufficiently to place Hillary Clinton in the White House, all Hell breaks loose across America:

The FBI goes into full indictment mode to push criminal charges for the Clinton criminal regime.

Donald Trump launches a massive legal challenge to the election outcome, dispatching an army of lawyers to
level a vast assortment of charges involving coordinated voter fraud, the rigging of voting machines, the attempted
bribery of Electoral voters and so on.

The U.S. military revs up its plans for an armed military coup to depose Clinton and restore democracy. This one
should be especially entertaining to watch unfold if it gets activated... (and yes, YOU will beg for a short-term
military dictatorship as long as they promise to depose Clinton and restore open, fair and free elections).

Armed U.S. citizens prepare for a massive march on Washington to take back their democracy and restore a
lawful society where the political elite don't get away with corruption, fraud and murder. Expect this march to be
joined by police officers and federal law enforcement officials of all kinds.
Related: NSA Whistleblower: US Intelligence Worker Likely Behind DNC Leaks, Not Russia

The NSA likely goes into "full dump" mode to unleash every scrap of damning criminal evidence against Hillary
Clinton. This will likely be joined by CIA assets who already have the goods on the Clintons and their "Lolita
Express" pedo joy rides.

Wikileaks, Anonymous and every former NSA analyst goes into "destroy the Clintons" mode and begins to hack
and expose every last shred of email evidence ever possessed by the Clintons and anyone close to them.

Anonymous alone has enough technical clout to accomplish this with little or no outside help. (I expect Kim
Dotcom to be aiding this entire effort as well, as he rightly holds extreme hatred toward Hillary Clinton... as do we
all, come to think of it.)

The establishment Republicans in the U.S. Congress will, as usual, meekly surrender to the democrats, pulls
down their britches and bend over to prepare to take it in the rear because that's what they do best when the going
gets tough.

Totally useless politicrats like John McCain can't get their pants around their ankles quickly enough when
democrats start accusing them of something. These useless heaps of human baggage will be tossed out of
Washington as the revolution unfolds, replaced with individuals who actually honor the U.S. Constitution (like Rep.
Louie Gohmert).

I Root for All Groups Working to Save America and Expose the Criminal Politicians

Bring out the marshmallows and weiners, folks: This is going to be the most bizarre campfire front row seat to U.S. history
that anyone has witnessed in over 200 years.

Try not to trip and "face plant" into the flames as all this unfolds. It might be a smart idea to have some preparedness
supplies at the ready, since no one really knows just how nasty this is all going to get. (And thank God Hillary doesn't have
her fingers on the nuclear launch codes, or she'd probably launch them just to change the narrative...)
Related: This Viral Video Has Hillary Running Scared

As for me, I'm with anybody who's trying to save America, restore democracy and throw the establishment criminals in
prison.

Like almost everybody else, I've had enough of the lies, the corruption, the media deceptions and the incessant blood
sucking parasites in Washington D.C. who are too arrogant and stupid to realize just how much they're universally
despised.

The revolution is ON. Anonymous, Wikileaks, Project Veritas, the FBI and the NSA have all been activated. There's no
stopping them now, and all the details of all the crimes of the Clintons are about to spill onto the stage of history, dirty deeds
and all.

Be warned, you are probably not psychologically prepared for the truth about what the Clintons really are. You will probably
vomit.

Internal Coup Against Hillary Clinton Has Begun: Red Alert

Inside the Invisible Government

The Path to Total Dictatorship: America's Shadow Government and Its Silent Coup
Clinton Emails Linked To Political Pedophile Sex Ring FBI Insider

FDNY Fireworks Detail for Hillary Clinton Prompts Questions

'Clinton is in serious trouble': Internet pirate Kim Dotcom warns 'there's unpublished material yet to come'

Hillary Clinton embraces George Soros radical vision of open-border world

Hillary Clintons Strategic Ambition In A Nutshell. Regime Change in Russia Putin is an Obstacle

The World Purposely Destabilised

Hillarys Girlfriend Caught In Yahoo Attack

Forget the FBI cache; the Podesta emails show how America is run

Wikileaks Releases Clinton Foundation Bombshell: If This Story Gets Out, We Are Screwed

Hillary Clinton is an alcoholic

Is This Why Comey Broke: A Stack Of Resignation Letters From Furious FBI Agents

650,000 Emails Found On Anthony Weiner's Laptop; DOJ Blocked Foundation Probe

Clinton operative 'Dirty' Donna Brazile let Hillary Clinton CHEAT at the debates

John Podesta's Best Friend At The DOJ Will Be In Charge Of The DOJ's Probe Into Huma Abedin Emails

Investigating Donald Trump, F.B.I. Sees No Clear Link to Russia

Feds Leak Details of New Clinton Investigation / Weinergate - Could this be the end of Hillary's campaign?

The Director of the FBI Reopens the Hillary Case

Clintons Are Under Multiple FBI Investigations as Agents Are Stymied

Trey Gowdy Just Joined Trump And Gave The Best Media Attack

Guilty as Sin Uncovering New Evidence of Corruption and How Hillary & the Democrats Derailed the FBI
Investigation

Hillary Clinton Goes Full Tin Foil Hat

Clinton resorts to pushing outlandish accusations in attempt to divert attention from herself

With her campaign going up in flames, Clinton resorts to red-baiting and finger pointing, obvious projection that
ironically exposes her own corruption.
Mainstream Media Manipulation, Societal Engineering & Government Propaganda

Part One: Click here

Part Two: Click here

Part Three: Click here

Part Four: Click here

http://www.wakeupkiwi.com/mass-media-manipulation-1.shtml

Mainstream Media Manipulation, Societal Engineering & Government Propaganda

Part One: Click here

Part Two: Click here

Part Three: Click here

Part Four: Click here

The Globalization Of Media: A Failing Strike Force


November 3 2016 | From: JonRappoport
I begin this piece with three quotes from my work-in-progress, The Underground:

There is a media metaphysics. Its basic principle states that nothing exists until it becomes information. Now we
have a new twist: information only becomes real when it reaches a mind already attuned to it. In other words, the
tree falling in the forest makes a sound only if a user/consumer who wants a tree to fall receives video and audio of
the event

Related: Mainstream Media Achieve Historic Milestone + Trust This: New Zealanders Don't Trust MPs, Bloggers,
The Media
Information can be dressed up a thousand different ways. But it tends to have an elastic quality. By that I mean you
eventually get to see the person who dressed it up. Thats a problem for chronic liars who inhabit the press. They expose
themselves, even though they dont want to. It takes a surprisingly small push to expose the whole operation. This is
happening now, right in front of our eyes.
The basis of big media is theater. News is theater. Its directors and producers think theyre doing a first-rate job. But
theyre sadly mistaken. Gaps and obfuscations are growing larger. The outright non-sequiturs and gibberish are becoming
more apparent. The audience is wising up to the farce. Who are these fools who direct the news?

Theyre simply people who want to sell their souls and have found an elite buyer. But that transaction doesnt contain any
guarantees about shelf life. Mainstream news is decaying, and the expiration date is approaching. Like civilizations, the
petty princes of information rise and fall
Globalized media. Its nice plan. Lets examine it.
Related: Western Media Credibility In Free Fall Collapse: Case In Point: UN Peace Council: The US Media Is Lying
To The American people. The War In Syria Is Not A Civil War, It's A Proxy Invasion By The United States
The new technocratic media is based on profiling users. There is no impactful news unless each member of the audience is
surveilled and analyzed on the basis of what he already likes and wants.
Shocking? Its to be expected. How else would technocrats parlay the untold hours theyve spent sizing up their
consumers/users?
Several years ago, I wrote:

Tech blather has already begun, since Jeff Bezos, CEO of Amazon, bought the Washington Post at a fire sale.
Jeff Genius will invent new ways to transmit the news to people on the go and make the Post a smashing
success. Mobile devices. Multiple platforms.

Digital taking over from print. Ads customized to fit readers interests (profiling). News stories customized to fit
readers interests (more profiling).

In other words, non-news. If you thought media were irrelevant and deceptive before, you havent seen anything. The new
news will create millions of virtual bubbles in which profiled users can float contentedly, under the cozy cottage roofs of their
favorite little separate paradigms.
The tech giant Apple has waded into this territory with an app that will deliver news to users. Yahoo:

Apple News, part of the upcoming iOS 9 operating system, aims to be the primary news source for users of the
iPhone and iPad Apple says its news app follows over a million topics and pulls relevant stories based on your
specific interests

Joshua Benton of the Nieman Journalism Lab said the app will be important because through the awesome power
of default, Apple distribution puts it in an entirely other league. This [news] app will be on hundreds of millions of
devices within 24 hours of its debut.

Translation: Profiling their users down to their toenails, Apple will present them with virtual bubbles of news they
want to see and read.
Not just one overall presentation for all; no, different news outlets for Apples audiences.

Related: I Used to Be a Human Being


This introduces a whole new layer of mind control.
Youre an Obama fan? Here are stories confirming your belief in the Prophet.
You want neo-con on the rocks with a conservative Republican twist? Heres some war footage thatll warm your heart.
Do you believe government gridlock is our biggest concern? Congress cant get anything done? Weve got headlines for
that from here to the moon.
Tuned into celeb gossip? Heres your world in three minutes.
The idea: convince users, one day at a time, that what they already believe is important IS the news of the day.
Its Decentralized Centralization. One media giant carving its global audience up into little pieces and delivering them a
whole host of different algorithmically appropriate lies and fluff and no-context psyops.
Related: Obama Decries 'Wild West' [Independent] Media Landscape
And for fringe users? Youre doubtful about GMOs? Well, look at what Whole Foods is planning for their healthier produce
section. Cheer up. Nothing about Maui voters declaring a temporary ban on devastatingly toxic Monsanto/Dow experiments
or the dangers of Roundup.

Youre anti-vaccine? Sorry, you dont count. Youre not a recognized demographic. But heres a piece about a little
unvaccinated boy who was involved in car crash on the I5.
Does this sound like science fiction? It isnt. Its the mainstream look of the near-future. Search engines are already
personalizing your inquiries. US ABC national news is climbing in the ratings because its giving viewers lighter stories,
and spending less time on thorny issues like the Middle East.
Related: Who Owns New Zealand's Media?
The mainstream news business is desperately looking for audience; and treating every user as a profiled social-construct-
bundle of superficial preferences is their answer.
Mr. X, weve studied the little virtual bubble you live in, and now we can sell you your own special brand of truth.
Hello, audience. Were going to pitch you on becoming full-fledged obsessed consumers, as if there is no other worthy goal
in life - and then were going to profile you from top to bottom, to find out exactly what kind of obsessed consumer you are,
so we can hit you and trigger you with information that uniquely stimulates your adrenal glands
The one-two punch.

Trey Gowdy Joins Trump and Gives a Great Mainstream Media Attack

Any actual event occurring in the world will be pre-digested by robot media editors and profilers, and then split up into
variously programmed bits of information for different audiences.
Who cares what really happened? In the new world, there is no what really happened. Thats a gross misnomer. A faulty
idea. A metaphysical error.

No, there is only a multi-forked media tongue that simultaneously spits out a dozen or a hundred variations of the same
eventbecause different viewers want and expect different realities.
Related: Hidden Truths About The Mainstream News Media
In 1984, Orwells Big Brother was issuing a single voice into the homes of the population. That was old-school. That was
primitive technology. That was achieving unity by hammering unity into peoples skulls. This, now, is the frontier of unity
through diversity.

We want to make all of you into androids, through basic PR and propaganda and a pathetic excuse for education.
However, we recognize youll become different varieties of androids, and well serve that outcome with
technological sophistication. Trust us. We care about what you prefer.

User A: Wow, did you see the coverage of the border war in Chula Vista?

User B: War? They had a fantastic exhibit of drones down there. At least a hundred different types. And then I
watched an old WW2 movie about aerial combat.

User C: Chula Vista? They had a great food show. This woman made a lemon pie. I could practically taste it.

User D: That wasnt a border war. It was a drill. And then afterwards, these cops gave a demonstration of all their
gear. Vests, shields, communication devices, flash-bangs, auto rifles with silencers, batons. I watch drills all over
the country. Love them.

User E: Chula Vista? The only thing I saw on the news was sunny and mild this week. I watch all the weather
channels. I love them.

BUT when a Big One comes along, like the 2016 national election in the US, the separate tunes come together and ring as
one. Then the overriding need to extend Globalisms goals (in the person of Hillary Clinton) blot out every other priority.
Related: Alternative Media Is Winning: 60% Of Americans [ Read: The West ] Distrust Mainstream Media

Then the major media twist whatever they need to twist. Then its the same bubble for everyone.
One problem, though. Major media have been lanced thousands of times by alt news sites, and by Wikileaks and Project
Veritas. This attack has exposed the truth and the Clinton crimes.
And alt news reflects the growing interest of the public in whats actually happening on many fronts.
The technocratic plan for the news is failing.
It was a nice plan, but Its turning out to be a dud.
Alt media are forcing public awareness of one giant scandal after another: Hillary/Obama support for ISIS; pro-vaccine liars;
the collapse of Obamacare; the GMO hustle; pesticide damage... on and on and on.
Related: Mainstream Media Manipulation / Controlling The Narrative + Mosaic Of Facts: Inside The Information War
The result? Major media are being backed into a corner, where they must defend lies and build monolithic lies for
EVERYONE all the time. The idea of creating separate news for each profiled user is collapsing.
Major media are playing defense against the rest of the world.
Its quite a party. And it has no expiration date.
A final note: Trump, Wikileaks, Project Veritas, Drudge, and many alt news sites created a perfect storm in 2016, raining
down on major media.

It was and is unprecedented.

The mainstream press has been exposed down to its roots, as never before. The lying, the collusion, the arrogant
sense of entitlement, the desperation, the corruption - its all there to see, for anyone who has eyes and a few
working brain cells.

Expect more to come, regardless of the outcome of the election. The train has really left the station

Dear Mainstream Media


You f**king suck! Youve almost succeeded in destroying the 4th estate and you should be ashamed of yourselves.
This is why 94% of the American people dont trust you. When are you going to get that through your thick skulls?
You lie, you smear, you ingratiate yourselves with wanton abandon.
Dear mainstream media: Youve betrayed your profession, sacrificed its once sacred principles, and stabbed the American
people in the back.

Related: Six Giant Corporations Control the Media, and Americans Consume 10 Hours of Programming a Day
The Real Reason Why The UN Wants Control Over The Internet
November 2 2016 | From: DeWeeseReport

By its very nature, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) is a non-
profit organization exclusively run by Technocrats.

As such, it is an apolitical body that is happy to serve whatever form of governance exists as long as funding is
received and salaries are paid. To a Technocrat, a world run by science and technology is better than any other
form of governance.

Related: The UN Releases Plan to Push for Worldwide Internet Censorship

That Technocrats have played a supporting role in world history is unquestioned. Scientists, engineers and technicians
played a huge role in the Communist dictatorship in the former Soviet Union (For instance, see Science and the Soviet
Social Order).
Related: Vampire Technocrats Fly To Jekyll Island To Stop Trump

Technocrats likewise played a central role in support of Adolph Hitler and National Socialism (See Scientists, Engineers and
National Socialism). In both cases, the Technocrat goal was not necessarily Communism or Nazism, but rather the
methodical exercise of science according to its Scientific Method.

In other words, the process was more important than the outcome and in both cases, the outcome was not questioned or
resisted, but simply accepted.

Reality Check: Obama Administration Has Handed Over The Internet to a Private Corporation

The reason that ICANN formerly served the interests of the United States was simply that it answered to our governments
judicial, legislative and executive branches. In other words, the U.S. held the umbrella over ICANN and that was enough to
keep it working for our national interests and not for someone elses interests.
Obama changed that when he cut ICANN loose on September 30, 2016 by letting the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
(IANA) contract expire without being renewed. After expiration, we forever lost the right to renew the contract again.
So, ICANN is now a free-agent looking for shelter in the same way that a boll weevil looks for a cotton plant: it needs a
host organization in order to practice its craft, and, I dare say, it doesnt care one whit who that host is.

What does ICANN do?


Click on the image above to open a larger version in a new window
It is no secret that the United Nations is making a play to become host to ICANN. In particular, the UNs International
Telecommunications Union (ITU), run by the Peoples Republic of China, is expected to play the central role in this effort.

However, whether it is the ITU or some other UN agency is immaterial because it will still be the UN in the end.
But, why the UN? Because it is the fountainhead of the plans and operations to establish Technocracy as the sole global
economic system while destroying capitalism and free enterprise. Technocracy is the issue here. Others know it as
Sustainable Development or Green Economy, but the correct historical term is Technocracy.
In February 2015, the head of climate change at the UN, Christiana Figures, stated,

This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a
defined period of time to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150
years, since the industrial revolution. [emphasis added]

What is unclear about this? Sustainable Development, or Technocracy, is a resource-driven economic model regulated by
energy rather than by supply and demand plus monetary currencies. In 1938, the original Technocrats defined Technocracy
as

The science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute
goods and services to the entire population.

To achieve its Utopia goals, the UN must have ICANNs steering wheel and throttle. But while everyone is stressing over
Internet censorship of web sites and the suppression of free speech, the real prize is completely overlooked: The Internet of
Things (IoT).
In terms of follow the money, IoT is expected to generate upwards of $3 trillion by 2025 and is growing at a rate of at least
30 percent per year. In other words, it is a huge market and money is flying everywhere. If the UN can figure out a way to
tax this market, and they will, it will provide a windfall of income and perhaps enough to make it self-perpetuating. Currently,
the UN is financed by contributions from member states.
But, what is the IoT and who cares? IoT are the connections between inanimate objects and the humans that depend upon
them. The digital Smart Meter on your home communicates energy usage via WiFi to the utility company; but it also
communicates with the major appliances in your home and can even control them remotely without your consent or
knowledge.

The smart phone that you carry communicates with cell towers and localized signal receptors to create a map of your every
movement. Smart home technology lets your stereo send sound to remote wireless speakers and to light bulbs equipped
with sensors.

The security camera that you installed to watch your home while you were on vacation can communicate with other
cameras, microphones, the police department, etc. Examples go on and on.
ICANN issues the so-called IP addresses that are assigned to all these devices on a global basis. The original addressing
scheme, IPV4, was based on four blocks of up to three digits each, punctuated with a period (e.g., 192.168.2.14). This
scheme allows for a discrete address for up to 16.8 million devices.

A few years ago, IPV4 ran out of numbers, forcing Internet service providers, corporations and other organizations to
improvise internal numbering systems, known as proxy servers, to issue safe addresses to devices within their own
domain. These systems are not only fragile, but they are bloated beyond reason and generally easy to hack.
To fix this, ICANN devised a new IP numbering system called IPV6, which adds two more blocks of numbers (e.g.,
192.168.2.14.231.58).

This scheme provides for 3.41038 addresses, or 340 trillion, 282 billion, 366 million, 920 thousand, 938 - followed by 24
zeroes. There is probably a way to say this number, but I cannot imagine what it would be. Its somewhere beyond a trillion
trillion unique numbers for every human being on earth!
Thus, IPV6 provides a way to assign a unique and directly addressable number to every electronic device on earth for
centuries to come.
As IPV6 rolls out to the world, the modified mission for ICANN will be to inventory and categorize the device attached to
each IP address. For instance, all the air conditioners in the world would be directly addressable from a single list. Likewise
for all computers, all automobiles, all cameras, all phones, all refrigerators, all articles of clothing, etc.
Whoever has control over and access to this data will literally be able to control the entire world, down to the last minutiae
and that is the United Nations exact mission: inventory, monitor and control.
But, this concept was set in history long before the technology existed. The original bible of Technocracy, the Technocracy
Study Course (1934), laid out the hard requirements necessary for its implementation:

1. Register on a continuous 24 hour-per-day basis the total net conversion of energy.

2. By means of the registration of energy converted and consumed, make possible a balanced load.

3. Provide a continuous inventory of all production and consumption

4. Provide a specific registration of the type, kind, etc., of all goods and services, where produced and
where used

5. Provide specific registration of the consumption of each individual, plus a record and description of
the individual.

- Scott, Howard et al, Technocracy Study Course, p. 232

As I thoroughly documented in my book, Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation, the United
Nations is indeed the engine of modern Technocracy and as such, it is acting in a perfectly predictable manner.
Related: Technocracy: A Scientific Dictatorship

It seeks to establish a global Scientific Dictatorship where it controls all resources, all production and limits all consumption
to its own liking. These Technocrats will dutifully apply their pseudo-scientific methodology to every problem in the world,
and simply issue instructions to the net to make it so.
Yes, free speech will decrease and censorship will increase, but that pales in comparison to the real prize of the IoT
that the United Nations desperately wants and needs in order to accomplish its own twisted goals.
Congress never understood this when they passively let Obama fail to renew our contract with ICANN. However, Obama
and his globalist handlers understood it perfectly well, which makes the deception and treachery of it even worse.

Thanks to this scurrilous bunch, the world has just been sold into digital slavery, from which there may be no return.
Related: Warning: Dont Share This Article, Facebook Might Ban You!

Social Engineering - The War On The Higher Mind Of Humans: Heres Why You Should
Consider Converting Your Music To A=432 Hz
November 1 2016 | From: CollectiveEvolution

If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and
vibration. - Nikola Tesla
What we have called matter is energy, whose vibration has been so lowered as to be perceptible to the senses.
There is no matter. Albert Einstein

Related: The A=432 Hz Frequency: DNA Tuning And The Bastardisation Of Music

Tesla said it. Einstein agreed. Science proved it. It is a known fact that everythingincluding our own bodiesis made up of
energy vibrating at different frequencies. That being said, it seems logical to wonder, can sound frequencies affect us?

It would appear that this is the case. Frequencies affect frequencies, much like mixing ingredients with other ingredients
affects the overall flavour of a meal. The way frequencies affect the physical world has been demonstrated through various
experiments, such as the science of Cymatics and water memory.

Cymatics illustrate that when sound frequencies move through a particular medium such as water, air, or sand, they directly
alter the vibration of matter. Below are pictures demonstrating how particles adjust to different frequencies. (Click here to
watch a video demonstrating the patterns of sound frequencies)

Water memory also illustrates how our own intentions may even alter the material world. This has been demonstrated by
Dr. Masaru Emoto, who has performed studies showing how simple intentions through sound, emotions, and thoughts can
dramatically shape the way water crystallizes.
We all hold a certain vibrational frequency, and our bodies are estimated to be about 70% water. Given the above
experiments, it stands to reason that musical frequencies could also alter our own vibrational state.

Every expression through sound, emotion, or thought holds a specific frequency which influences everything around it -
much like a single drop of water can create a larger ripple effect in a large body of water.

Music Frequency

With this concept in mind, let us bring our attention to the frequency of the music we listen to. Most music worldwide has
been tuned to A=440 Hz since the International Standards Organization (ISO) promoted it in 1953.

However, when looking at the vibratory nature of the universe, its possible that this pitch is disharmonious with the natural
resonance of nature and may generate negative effects on human behaviour and consciousness.
Some theories (although unproven) even suggest that the Nazi regime had been in favor of adopting this pitch as standard
after conducting scientific research to determine which range of frequencies best induce fear and aggression.

Whether or not the conspiracy is factual, interesting studies have pointed towards the benefits of tuning music to A=432 Hz
instead.

Mathematics of The Universe

432 Hz is said to be mathematically consistent with the patterns of the universe. It is said that 432 Hz vibrates with the
universes golden mean PHI and unifies the properties of light, time, space, matter, gravity and magnetism with biology, the
DNA code, and consciousness.

When our atoms and DNA start to resonate in harmony with the spiralling pattern of nature, our sense of connection to
nature is said to be magnified. The number 432 is also reflected in ratios of the sun, Earth, and moon, as well as the
precession of the equinoxes, the Great Pyramid of Egypt, Stonehenge, and the Sri Yantra, among many other sacred sites.

From my own observations, some of the harmonic overtone partials of A=432hz 12T5 appear to line up to natural
patterns and also the resonance of solitons. Solitons need a specific range to form into the realm of density and
span from the micro to the macro cosmos. Solitons are not only found in water mechanics, but also in the ion-
acoustic breath between electrons and protons.

Brian T. Collins
Color Spectrum Resonance

Another interesting factor to consider is that the A=432 Hz tuning correlates with the color spectrum and chakra system,
while the A=440 Hz does not.

The Solar Spectrum & The Cosmic Keyboard

All of the frequencies in the spectrum are related in octaves, from gamma rays to subharmonics. These colors and
notes are also related to our Chakras and other important energy centers. I

f we are to understand that Chakras are connected to the Seven Rays of the Solar Spectrum, then the notes and
frequencies we use for the same should be the same.

A432 Hz is the tuning of the Cosmic Keyboard or Cosmic Pitchfork, as opposed to the A440 Hz modern standard.
It places C# at 136.10 Hz Om, which is the main note of the Sitar in classical Indian music and the pitch of the
chants of the Tibetan monks, who tell us, It comes from nature.'

Dameon Keller

Exploring The Difference

Lets explore the experiential difference between A=440 Hz and A=432 Hz. Music lovers and musicians have noticed that
music tuned in A=432 Hz is not only more beautiful and harmonious to the ears, but it also induces a more inward
experience that is felt inside the body at the spine and heart.

Music tuned in A=440 Hz was felt as a more outward and mental experience, and was felt at the side of the head which
projected outwards.

Audiophiles have also stated that A=432hz music seems to be non-local and can fill an entire room, whereas A=440hz can
be perceived as directional or linear in sound propagation.
The ancients tuned their instruments at an A of 432 Hz instead of 440 Hz and for a good reason. There are
plenty of music examples on the internet that you can listen to, in order to establish the difference for yourself.
Attuning the instrument to 432 Hz results in a more relaxing sound, while 440 Hz slightly tenses up to body.

This is because 440 Hz is out of tune with both macrocosmos and microcosmos. 432 Hz on the contrary is in tune.
To give an example of how this is manifested microcosmically: our breath (0,3 Hz) and our pulse (1,2 Hz) relate to
the frequency of the lower octave of an A of 432 Hz (108 Hz) as 1:360 and 1:90.

innergarden.org

The overall sound difference was noticeable, the 432 version sounding warmer, clearer and instantly sounded
more listenable but the 440 version felt tighter, with more aggressive energy.

Anonymous guitarist

The video below was created by someone with no opinion on whether A=432 Hz or A=440 Hz is better. Therefore,
the way both versions of the melody is played is unbiased. It is up to us to tune in and feel which one feels more
harmonious to us!

Heres another example:

David Helpling Sticks and Stones in 440 hz

David Helpling Sticks and Stones in 432 hz


Personal Thoughts

I personally have enjoyed many bands, artists, and styles of music even though they were tuning in A=440 hz, however,
after comparing a few songs in both A=432 hz and A=440 hz I can say I definitely feel and hear the difference.

I wouldnt say that my experience of 440hz music has turned me into an aggressive person, but I can understand how an
entire population being exposed to music that is more mind directed as opposed to heart directed - not to mention all of the
materialistic and ego-driven lyrics in most popular music - is a perfect combination to maintain a more discordant frequency
and state of consciousness within humanity.

This is, of course, simply my own opinion.

Music based on C=128hz (C note in concert A=432hz) will support humanity on its way towards spiritual freedom.
The inner ear of the human being is built on C=128 hz. Rudolph Steiner

I cannot state with complete certainty that every idea suggested in this article is 100% accurate, nor am I an expert on the
subject. I simply gathered interesting information from others who researched this issue more deeply.

For this reason, if we are looking for scientific validation for these claims, I suggest that we each do our own research on the
matter with an open yet discerning mind. Perhaps more research on this topic will be done in the near future to help explain
the phenomenon.

I believe we all possess intuition and the ability to observe without judgment, which can be more useful than resorting to
ridicule when exposed to information that has not yet been accepted by the scientific community.

It is therefore up to us to tone down the urge to jump to conclusions and instead EXPERIENCE the difference between
A=440 Hz and A=432 Hz. To do so, we need to listen with our entire body and a neutral awareness as opposed to with our
mental ideas, judgments, and preconceptions.
If you are interested in changing your musics pitch to A=432 hz, click here to learn how to do it.

Many Scientific Truths Are, In Fact, False + A Scientist Explains Why "Everything Is
Fucked"
October 31 2016 | From: QZ / Inverse / Various

In 2005, John Ioannidis, a professor of medicine at Stanford University, published a paper, Why
most published research findings are false, mathematically showing that a huge number of
published papers must be incorrect.

He also looked at a number of well-regarded medical research findings, and found that, of 34 that had been
retested, 41% had been contradicted or found to be significantly exaggerated.

Related: The Rise Of Scientific Fundamentalism

Since then, researchers in several scientific areas have consistently struggled to reproduce major results of prominent
studies. By some estimates, at least 51% - and as much as 89% - of published papers are based on studies and
experiments showing results that cannot be reproduced.

Related: Crisis In Science Research: Over 70% Of Researchers Fail To Reproduce Another Scientist's Experiments
Researchers have recreated prominent studies from several scientific fields and come up with wildly different results.

And psychology has become something of a poster child for the reproducibility crisis since Brian Nosek, a psychology
professor at the University of Virginia, coordinated a Reproducibility Initiative project to repeat 100 psychological
experiments, and could only successfully replicate 40%.
Related: Some Of The Biggest Lies Of Science

Now, an attempt to replicate another key psychological concept (ego depletion: the idea that willpower is finite and can be
worn down with overuse) has come up short.

Martin Hagger, psychology professor at Curtin University in Australia, led researchers from 24 labs in trying to recreate a
key effect, but found nothing. Their findings are due to be published in Perspectives on Psychological Science in the coming
weeks.

Why Are They Getting it Wrong?

No one is accusing the psychologists behind the initial experiments of intentionally manipulating their results. But some of
them may have been tripped up by one or more of the various aspects of academic science that inadvertently encourage
bias.
For example, theres massive academic pressure to publish in journals, and these journals tend to publish exciting studies
that show strong results.

"Journals favor novelty, originality, and verification of hypotheses over robustness, stringency of method,
reproducibility, and falsifiability, Hagger tells Quartz.

Therefore researchers have been driven to finding significant effects, finding things that are novel, testing them on
relatively small samples.

This has created a publication bias, where studies that show strong, positive results get published, while similar studies that
come up with no significant effects sit at the bottom of researchers drawers.
Related: The Top 10 Tricks Used By Corporate Junk Science

Meanwhile, in cases where researchers have access to large amounts of data, theres a dangerous tendency to hunt for
significant correlations. Researchers can thus convince themselves that theyve spotted a meaningful connection, when in
fact such connections are totally random.

A Sign of Strength

The idea that papers are publishing false results might sound alarming but the recent crisis doesnt mean that the entire
scientific method is totally wrong. In fact, sciences focus on its own errors is a sign that researchers are on exactly the right
path.
Ivan Oransky, producer of the blog Retraction Watch, which tracks retractions printed in journals, tells Quartz that ultimately,
the alarm will lead to increased rigor.

"Theres going to be some short-term and maybe mid-term pain as all of this shakes out, but thats how you move
forward, he says. Its like therapy - if you never get angry in therapy, youre probably not pushing hard enough. If
you never find mistakes, or failures to reproduce in your field, youre probably not asking the right questions.

For psychologists, who have seen so many results crumble in such a short space of time, the replication crisis could be
disheartening. But it also presents a chance to be at the forefront of developing new policies.
Related: Official Science: The Grand Illusion
Ioannidis tells Quartz that he views the most recent psychology reproducibility failures as a positive.

"It shows how much effort and attention has gone towards improving the accuracy of the knowledge produced, he
says.

Psychology is a discipline that has always been very strong methodologically and was at the forefront at
describing various biases and better methods. Now they are again taking the lead in improving their replication
record.

For example, theres already widespread discussion within psychology about pre-registering trials (which would prevent
researchers from shifting their methods so as to capture more eye-catching results), making data and scientific methods
more open, making sample sizes larger and more representative, and promoting collaboration.

Dorothy Bishop, a professor of developmental neuropsychology at Oxford University, tells Quartz that several funding
bodies and journals seem to be receptive to these ideas and that, once one or two adopt such policies, she expects them to
spread rapidly.

Doing Science on Science

Each scientific field must adopt its own methods of ensuring accuracy. But ultimately, this self-reflection is a key part of the
scientific process.
Related: The Cult Of 'Scientism' Explained: How Scientific Claims Behind Cancer, Vaccines, Psychiatric Drugs And
GMOs Are Nothing More Than Corporate-Funded Science Fraud
As Bishop notes, Science has proved itself to be an incredibly powerful method. And yet theres always room for further
advancement.

"Theres never an end point, says Bishop. Were always groping towards the next thing. Sometimes science does
disappear down the wrong path for a bit before it corrects itself.

For Nosek, who led the re-testing of 100 psychology papers, the current focus on reproducibility is simply part of the
scientific process.

"Science isnt about truth and falsity, its about reducing uncertainty, he says.

Really this whole project is science on science: Researchers doing what science is supposed to do, which is be
skeptical of our own process, procedure, methods, and look for ways to improve.

A Scientist Explains Why "Everything Is Fucked"


But that doesn't mean we should give up.
Between the duping of the American public from Big Sugar, shocking moral fact-checks on some of historys most
groundbreaking experiments, and failure after failure of science research weve accepted as truth, science is
teetering on the verge of being, well, fucked.

Related: Junk Science Week: Science Is On The Verge Of A Nervous Breakdown


Actually, it might be too late.
Those fears drove University of Oregon psychologist Sanjay Srivastava, Ph.D., to design the fictitious course Everything Is
Fucked. The imagined ten-week seminar, written up as a syllabus on his blog, is Srivastavas version of a reality check for
young scientists:

Do you seriously think youre going to cure the worlds diseases and elevate humanity through technology? You wont -
because everything is fucked.
This may seem a little harsh. After all, arent CRISPR, the discovery of Martian water, and the newly not-endangered panda
and whale proof that science is alive and well?
But thats the problem with science, Srivastava argues: Were so intent on focusing on the results that we dont see the path
toward finding these results, and thats fucked up. Would CRISPR have become 2015s biological buzzword if academic
journal editors hadnt decided gene editing papers were worth publishing?

What else did we find out (or not find out) about Mars that wasnt deemed publishable? Can we even trust the data showing
the pandas and whales are thriving? We dont know, and not only is it fucked up, it raises questions about the foundations of
modern science altogether.
The everything in Everything Is Fucked, Srivastava explains, refers to scientific methods, the ways researchers acquire
funding, the universities that support research, and our channels for publishing and disseminating scientific knowledge.
He defines something as fucked if:

"It presents hard conceptual challenges to which implementable, real-world solutions for working scientists are
either not available or routinely ignored in practice.

For Srivastava, the way we discover and share scientific knowledge is so riddled with these problems that theres no way we
can fully trust what we believe to be true.
Take week eights theme, Scientific publishing is fucked. In the science community, a published paper in an academic
journal is professional currency; everyones striving to collect them, and anyone who doesnt have one is professionally
broke. Academic journals - big-name, respected publications like Nature, Science, and the New England Journal of
Medicine - are academias banks.
Related: Academic Oligarchy: Majority Of Science Publishing Is Controlled By Just Six Companies

In Srivastavas view, this is troublesome, because it means theyre in control. The problem is, theres this incentive to find
things that meet the publishable standards, he says, referring to science that shows positive results, like a drug that
promises a cure.

If journals only pay attention to the success stories, it means theyre ignoring all of the research that doesnt produce sexy
results. In turn, the temptation to falsify results and fudge graphs only grows stronger.
Scientists behind the unsexy studies are screwed: If they dont get published, they dont get tenure at research institutions or
grants to continue their work, and their scientific pursuits inevitably come to a standstill.

Related: Scientific American Writer Exposes The Tribal Cultist Arrogance And Dogmatic Lunacy Of Science
'Skeptics'

But does their work deserve to come to an end? Most of those studies are not wrong or useless, because negative
results are often just as useful for advancing scientific discovery as positive ones.

But they arent treated that way because they dont make for good publishing.

"Thats really where it starts: Publication decisions becoming hinged, not on whether its a good question, but on
whether the answer comes out, one way or another, Srivastava says.

The cycle continues, and fucked-ness persists.


He has other, finer bones to pick. In week six, he discusses the issue of replicability, which is the idea that an experiment
needs to be repeatable. If its not, the data it produces is, statistically, a one-off, and therefore pretty much useless.

And yet, there are an alarming number of scientific studies out there that are not replicable, cited by everyone from Big
Pharma to the federal government.
Related: A Totalitarian Society Has Totalitarian Science

He claims that the scientific profession as a whole is fucked in week ten because the pressure on scientists to publish more
papers, faster, leads to smaller sample sizes, which in turn lead to weaker, less statistically sound results.

The scientists that design better, more thorough experiments may be doing better science, but because they arent
publishing as many studies, theyre ultimately viewed as less accomplished.

"Where do truth and publishability depart? Srivastava ponders. When it comes time to hire people, were still
going to hire someone with more papers.

If it sounds like a massive clusterfuck, then Srivastava has made his point. Does that mean the pursuit of science in 2016 is
a completely futile endeavor?
No, Srivastava surprisingly argues. Look to week seven - Interlude - for a scientific salvation, right about the time when his
fictional students consider switching to a liberal arts degree, which can be distilled to this: Sure, everything is fucked, but its
up to the next generation of scientists to make science less so.

Theres hope, and the replicability crisis might ironically offer that by being a cautionary tale for the arrogance of science.

The rest of us should be at least calmed by the fact that sexy results are garnering more upturned eyebrows and head
scratching than ever before.
Related: Everything Is Rigged: Medicine, Science, Elections, The Media, Money, Education, Search Engines, Social
Media... You Are Living In A Fabricated Fairy Tale

Clinton Disaster Continues - FBI Reopens Investigation Into Clinton Emails + Busted:
Early Votes Are Already Being Switched - Even More Corruption Exposed On Video
October 30 2016 | From: Infowars / Zerohedge / Various
FBI looking into "new developments" after previously recommending no charges against
Democrat candidate.

The FBI on Friday announced it is reopening its investigation into Hillary Clintons private email server, another
shocking October surprise for the Democrat candidate days from the presidential election.

Related: Recent Poll Shows More Americans Want Clinton Indicted than Want Her to Be President

In a letter to committees and lawmakers relevant to the matter, FBI Director James Comey cited recent developments for
the bureaus decision to look into new emails which may contain classified information and how they may relate to its
previous investigation.

"In previous congressional testimony, I referred to the fact that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had
completed its investigation of former Secretary Clintons personal email server. Due to recent developments, I am
writing to supplement my previous testimony, Comey wrote in the letter obtained by CNBC.

In connection with an unrelated case, the FBI has learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to
the investigation.

I am writing to inform you that the investigative team briefed me on this yesterday, and I agreed that the
FBI should take appropriate investigative steps designed to allow investigators to review these emails to
determine whether they contain classified information, as well as to assess their importance to our
investigation.

Although the FBI cannot yet assess whether or not this material may be signifcant, and I cannot predict how long
it will take us to complete this additional work, I believe it is important to update your Committees about our efforts
in light of my previous testimony, Comey stated.
Republican Congressman Jason Chaffetz, who led an Oversight Committee effort to pursue perjury charges against Hillary,
tweeted about the FBIs announcement.
Back in July, Comey announced the FBIs investigation into Clintons use of a private email server during her tenure as
secretary of state would not result in a recommendation to the Justice Department to pursue charges.

"Although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our
view that no charges are appropriate in this case, the FBI director stated in a speech at the time.
A Clinton campaign spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment, reported the Washington
Post on Friday.

Related: Most Americans want Hillary indicted for email scandal Poll

Democrat vice presidential pick Tim Kaine said hes got to read a little more when asked about the FBI investigation during
an early voting site visit in Tallahassee, Florida, Friday.
Likewise, Hillary ignored questions shouted at her from reporters when she disembarked from her campaign plane for a rally
in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, according to the Associated Press.
She did not address the FBI announcement during her speech.
Reports state the campaign was unaware of the news until they touched down in Iowa as her plane did not have wi-fi:
However, one Wall Street Journal writer claims the plane does indeed have wi-fi:

Related: Watergate's Bob Woodward: "Clinton Foundation Is Corrupt, It's A Scandal"

So it just happens to go out today? asks the American Mirrors Kyle Olson.
The campaign later released a statement saying FBI Director Comey should provide the American public more information
than is contained in the letter he sent to eight Republican committee chairmen.
Already we have seen characterizations that the FBI is reopening an investigation but Comeys words do not match that
characterization, the campaign claimed.

Speaking at a campaign rally in Manchester, New Hampshire, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump jumped on
the bureaus decision to reopen its case:

The FBI has just sent a letter to Congress informing them that they have discovered new emails pertaining to the
former Secretary of State Hillary Clintons investigation. And they are reopening their case into her criminal and
illegal conduct that threatens the security of the United States of America.

Hillary Clintons corruption is on a scale we have never seen before. We must not let her take her criminal scheme
into the Oval Office.

I have great respect for the fact that the FBI and the Dept. of Justice are now willing to have the courage to right
the horrible mistake that they made. This was a grave miscarriage of justice that the American people fully
understood and it is everybodys hope that it is about to be corrected.

CNBC reports, Stocks turned negative after the report of the new probe, adding that Many analysts have said
that markets were pricing in a Clinton victory in November.

Related: Statement On Attempted Coverup Of Clinton's Emails At The State Department


Robert Creamer's Illegal $20,000 Foreign Wire Transfer Caught On Tape
Project Veritas has just released Part IV of it's multi-part series exposing numerous scandals
surrounding the DNC and the Clinton campaign, including efforts to incite violence at Trump rallies
and, at least what seems to be, illegal coordination between the DNC, Hillary For America and
various Super PACs.

Disgraced Democratic operative Robert Creamer participated in daily calls with the Hillary Clinton campaign, and worked directly with President
Barack Obama to organize issue campaigns.

Part IV focuses on a $20,000 foreign donation made by an undercover Project Veritas journalist to Americans
United for Change (AUFC). Ironically, shortly after the $20k donation wire was released, the contributor's "niece"
was offered an internship with Creamer's firm, Democracy Partners.

Related: "Dont Repeat That To Anybody" - Hillary Clinton And Donna Brazile Personally Implicated + The
Presstitutes Have Set Up The Election To Be Stolen
In the new video, Creamer says:

Every morning I am on a call at 10:30 that goes over the message being driven by the campaign headquarters
I am in this campaign mainly to deal with what earned media with television, radio, with earned media and social
media, not with paid media, not with advertising.

He also mentions a conference call discussing a woman potentially coming forward to accuse Trump of inappropriate
behavior.

Creamer, a seasoned Chicago activist who is married to Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), whose Republican opponent, Joan
McCarthy Lasonde has called for her to resign over her husbands activities, also talks about his work with Barack Obama,
whom he says he has known since the 1980s, when Obama was a community organizer in Chicago: Hes a pro, Ive known
the President since he was a community organizer in Chicago.
Related: Wall Street Journal Lashes Out The Press Is Burying Hillary Clintons Sins

Elsewhere, Creamer adds: I do a lot of work with the White House on their issues, helping to run issue campaigns that they
have been involved in. I mean, for immigration reform for the the health care bill, for trying to make America more like
Britain when it comes to gun violence issues.

In the effort to prove the credibility of the undercover donor featured in the videos and to keep the investigation
going, Project Veritas Action made the decision to donate twenty thousand dollars to Robert Creamers
effort. Project Veritas Action had determined that the benefit of this investigation outweighed the cost. And it did.

First thing, like I said, thank you for the proposal. And Id like to get the $20,000 across to you. The
second call Im going to make here is to my money guy and hes going to get in touch with you and auto
wire the funds to you, said the PVA journalist.

Creamer told the PVA journalist to send the money to Americans United for Change. Shortly after the money
was released, the donors niece - another Project Veritas Action journalist - was offered an internship
with Creamer.

In an effort to see how far Creamer would go with the promise of more money, another Project Veritas journalist
posing as the donors money liaison requested a meeting with Creamer. During that meeting, Creamer spoke
about connections he had with Obama and Clinton.

AUFC President, Brad Woodhouse, subsequently returned the money, after Project Veritas started to release their
undercover videos, citing "concerns that it might have been an illegal foreign donation."

Oddly, Woodhouse was not terribly concerned about the "legality" of the donation when he chose to accept it a month prior.
In an unexpected twist, AUFC president Brad Woodhouse, the recipient of the $20,000, heard that Project Veritas
Action was releasing undercover videos exposing AUFCs activities. He told a journalist that AUFC was going to
return the twenty thousand dollars.

He said it was because they were concerned that it might have been an illegal foreign donation. Project
Veritas Action was pleased but wondered why that hadnt been a problem for the month that they had the
money.

Related: Statement on Hillary Clintons Deliberate Incitement of Violence at Trump Rallies

While the latest video focuses on the "$20,000 illegal foreign contribution" from an undercover Project Veritas
journalist, the following comments from Robert Creamer were also rather intriguing in light of recent White House efforts to
vehemently deny any connections between he and President Obama.

"Oh Barack Obama's was the best campaign in the history of American politics, I mean the second one, I mean the
first was good too. I was a consultant to both, the second one, was everything hit on every level and every
aspect.

He's a pro. I've known the President since he was a community organizer in Chicago.

I was just at and event with him in Chicago actually, on Friday last. He is just as good as ever. I do a lot of
work with the White House on their issues. Helping to run issued campaigns that they have been involved in. I
mean, for immigration reform for the...the health care bill...trying to make America more like Britain when it comes
to gun violence issues."

Video 1 revealed DNC efforts to incite violence at Trump rallies. Video 2 provided the democrat playbook on how to commit
"mass voter fraud". Video 3 directly linking Donna Brazile and Hillary Clinton to efforts to disrupt Trump events.

See the first 3 videos and more in this earlier article:

Related: "Dont Repeat That To Anybody" - Hillary Clinton And Donna Brazile Personally Implicated + The
Presstitutes Have Set Up The Election To Be Stolen

Clinton Insider: Rigging Only Way Hillary Can Win

Shes going to lose and she knows it, he said.

Nichols explained that the establishment is already doing what it can to prevent an open and transparent election.

The DNC filed a lawsuit to try to force the removal of poll watchers at the polls, he said. Why would they do that
if they know theres no cheating going on? Why would they fight the voter ID if they dont plan to have massive
voter fraud?
The mainstream media and the Clinton campaign are also doing everything they can up until Election Day to make
everybody believe that the election is already over in Hillarys favor, Nichols said.

Folks, do not believe it, he said. The polling is a part of this game plan to destroy your confidence in your ability
to win.

I believe Donald Trump is winning, Nichols added. Youre winning. Youve just got to stay the course.

Nichols warned that voters must take extra steps to ensure their vote isnt being altered.

Youve got to make people at the precinct prove that your vote was recorded properly, he said. If they cant show
you proof, then demand a paper ballot.

The damning videos provided by Project Veritas exposing high-level Democrat operatives discussing how they steal
elections illustrate that worries about voter fraud arent unfounded, with even the New York Times acknowledging a recent
survey showing that most voters fear their ballot wont count because they believe the political process is so dominated by
corporate interests.

Related: Maryland Trump Supporter: They Switched My Vote to Hillary

Hillary's #1 Aide Huma Abedin: Undeniable Ties to Terrorists & 9/11 Funders

Related: The Failure of Democracy, How The Oligarchs Plan To Steal The Election

Related Articles:

Facebook goes full Orwellian, begins deleting PRIVATE messages that mention Hillary Clintons crimes
Clinton Fixer: Nothing I have heard Trump comes close to the sexual and moral corruption of the Clintons
Meet The Man Who Can Expose "The Real Hillary Clinton Scandal"
WikiLeaks Just Dropped Bombshell About Hillarys Health The Truth, Revealed
Mainstream Media Attempts To Defend Hillary And Attack Wikileaks, Fails Epically
Here Are Hillary Clinton's Three Speeches To Goldman Sachs For Which She Was Paid $675,000
Statement On Clinton Campaign Misleading Misleading On Contents Of Secret Server
Hillary's ties to Monsanto mean more GMOs, less transparency in labeling
Proof: Hillary Clinton Is Worse Than Putin
Hillarys Dark Secret Revealed Before Final Debate
Hillary Admits Shadow Government In Control
FBI Files: Hillary Clinton Stole Furniture From State Dept.
Wikileaks Emails Prove Obama Lied When He Said He Didnt Know Hillary Was Using Unsecure Email Server
Hillary Leaks Nuclear Secrets During Debate
False Flag Red Alert Potential for Murders Intended to Frame Trump and Twist Narrative with CNN Complicity
The Wikileaks List: At Least 65 MSM Reporters Were Meeting with / Coordinating Offline with Top Hillary Advisors
DNC Nomination Elections were Fabricated against Sanders
Hillary Clinton embraces George Soros radical vision of open-border world
SHOCKING Report Documents Massive Election Theft by the Democrats
Former Ohio Governor Triggered By Questions About Voter Fraud
Leaked Memo Exposes Shady Dealings Between Clinton Foundation Donors And Bill's "For-Profit" Activities
Statement On More Clinton State Department Corruption
Trump Attacks Hillarys Wild Spending Binge of Taxpayer Dollars
Leak Exposes Who Ordered Hillary To Leave behindThe 4 Men In Benghazi

Hillarys Massive meltdown"If that f - - - ing bastard wins, we all hang from nooses!
The Secret And Hidden Agenda Of Language: Why Many Words Are Magic Spells
October 30 2016 | From: Omnithought

Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosnt mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a
wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae.

The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not
raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.

Related: How Words Can Be Used As Magic Spells: Contracts, Law And Enslavement

Spelling: We Spell Words to Pronounce a [Prison] Sentence or Term


The first thing you learn when you go to school is how to spell. Words are spelled to create a sentence of terms. Think of a
jail sentence or a prison term.

The Wyrd sisters in Greek mythology were Fates or witches who controlled the fates of man. In our language we
use curse words and cursive writing. We cuss and dis-cuss. Words have meaning and (are) mean things especially cross
words.

They can be used to make a point. We use a con verse to converse in order to keep us off course in our dis-course as a
phrase frays. We use catch words. A story is a spiel or a spell. It is all part of the gospel of the Godspell or Gods spell.

Cursive (W)Riting
Books contain chapters. What is a chapter? A chapter is a secret society or religious order, like the Knights Templar.

A chapter contains many pages. What is a page? A page is an understudy and in service to the queen and king, as in pages
and squires, a knight who is well versed in magic and is more or less a soldier or trained assassin.

To page someone is to summons them. Pages summon demons to enslave or imprison our souls. After all, a page does
contain many sentences. A jail sentence is served in a prison ward.

And indeed a sentence is created by words that are spelled out by using letters. A letter is someone who allows something
to happen or someone who does something for some one else, like a bloodletter.

Languid Language

We languish in our languid language. Languid means weak and lacking spirit or void of animation,
lifeless and languish which means to lose strength or animation; be or become dull, feeble or spiritless; lackadaisical,
listless.

How are we imprisoned by our language? Think about a book. The word book as a verb means to arrest or detain - book
em, Danno.

In fact, the Latin word for book is liber, which is where we get our word library and also the word liberty. You can book a
reservation which means youre paying for the ownership of something in advance. You can book or place a bet on a game
or race with your bookie.
Yes, there is a bet being placed on a race - and it is the human race and the game is the game of life. It is the main bet or
the alpha bet. In a group of monkeys, the alpha monkey is the primary monkey or the one in control.
Theres a song called Spirits in the Material World from an album named Ghost in the Machine. The lyrics proclaim, Our so-
called leaders speak. With words they try to jail ya.
They subjugate the meek. Where do the answers lie when we live from day to day? We are spirits in a material world. The
song was performed by a group appropriately named, The Police. The song - and an entire album by Sting, the lead singer,
entitled The Soul Cages - refers to how we are spirits imprisoned in an earthly body.

Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosnt mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt
tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a
porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.
Words Mean Things

Most words have multiple meanings and synonyms not to mention many anagrams which the subconscious mind can
recognize. Factor in its homophones such as there, theyre, and their and it can get quite confusing to keep track.

What effect does that have when words with almost opposite meanings are homophones.

Think about know and no. Knowledge is considered a very positive word yet it is linked phonetically with the most
negative word in our language. So when you say I know this to be true are you partiallly negating its reality?

Consider the above statement in which the letters of the words have been rearranged, yet you still should be able to read it
without problem.

This means your subconscious mind should also relate multiple meanings to words have many anagrams. So it shouldnt be
any problem to associate God as good, the devil as evil. Now consider the following word relationships: live, evil; god, dog;
love, evol.

Pronouncing the words has a pronounced effect. The science of cymatics shows how all spoken sounds take on a vibratory
geometry or shape like how you can blow smoke rings by forming your mouth into the shape of the O. The tibetan monks
show how sound can be used to form geometric patterns in a plate of sand particles. So the spoken word can indeed create
reality.
Also consider the minds ability to combine words and sounds. When someone sneezes you feel customarily obligated to
say Bless you. But if you sound out the syllables does your subconscious mind also make the connection to the
phrase Be less, you.

So the very act of blessing someone can also be subconsciously telling them to be less. This is spell casting.
How are we being programmed through our language to go to the sun or hell? Hello?!!!! Helios was the Greek name for the
sun. The sun in English as well as other languages such as Latin, is called Sol. We are all said to be souls or to have
a soul (Sol). We have a solar plexus and our feet have soles.
Sole is sun in Italian. You are called a person (pertaining to the sun). When a male child is born, he is called a son (sun).
The word for sun is sonne in German.

Hu was one of the twelve gods in the Egyptian stellar cult which could explain why we are human. Colors and hues
originate from the light of the sun. Politicians encourage soldiers or sol diers to go to war for God and country. Of course,
when they die they will go to another dimension (die men sun).
Have you ever wondered why we use the word hello to greet each other? After all, the word can be reduced to hell, the fiery
place of eternal punishment and the suffix -o which means associated with.

In Greek mythology, Helios, which means sun, was the God of the Sun. Is it just a coincidence that you have a soul and
that our sun is called Sol?
If so, why do we call those who die in battle soldiers or sol diers? Is that why we say good morning when the sun rises -
because it is good to see the sun because it gives us life, but we are mourning those who sacrificed their souls to make it
possible. Why do we call our male offspring sons? You are called a person. Is it because you pertain to the sun?
Words are defined in a dictionary - dick-shun-nary. Two of the three syllables are negative sounds and theother is a
derogative slang term. Synonyms and antonyms are listed in a thesaurus.

The, from the greek theos, is the root of the-ology, the study of god and saurus means lizard. A thesaurus literally
means lizard god. How many names for government entities start with a negative prefix. The word nation is nay-shun. The
UN, Un-ited nations, NATO, NASI party, NASA, Norad, Unesco, NASCAR, NATAS, and Im sure you can come up with
others.

How to Ruin a Language with Rune Magic

Do some of the letters or building blocks of our language contain within them a blueprint for the control and possession of
our spirits? English has Germanic origins and it is likely that the english letters have their roots in the Germanic runes which
were used for magic and casting spells.

From Wikipedia on rune magic: In 1990, Stephan Grundy, a.k.a. Kveldulf Gundarsson, described runic magic as the active
principle as opposed to passive interpretations based on runic divination.
He held that runic magic is more active than the allegedly shamanic practice of seid practiced by the Seikona. Runic
magic, he states, uses the runes to affect the world outside based on the archetypes they represent.
Most of Gundarssons runic magic entails being in possession of a physical entity that is engraved with any or all of the
individual runes or staves, so as to practically work with their energies.

The individual runes are reddened with either blood, dyes, or paints. The act of possessing the stave in its final form serves
the purpose of affecting the world of form with the rune might of that particular stave. After use, the staves are discarded or
destroyed.
Gundarsson holds that each rune has a certain sound to it, to be chanted or sung; the sound has in common the phonetic
value by which it is represented. This act of singing or chanting is supposed to have more or less the same effect of using
the staves in their physical form.
Many of the letters of the English alphabet come directly from the Germanic Runes which were used for magic and spell
casting and for causing ruin. Look at how many English letters you can identify from the Elder Futhark rune set.

Grammar or Grimoire? Goetia & Cymantics


The word grammar comes from grammars which were old Latin books on syntax and diction. The ancient magic books of
Europe which contained instructions to summon demons were known as the Grimoires, French word for grammar.

A grimoire or spellbook is a derivative of the french word grammaire. The pronunciation and sound of words affects the
matter around us. The science of cymatics is the study of sound vibration on matter and it has been demonstrated with sand
on plates that vibration caan cause geometric patterns.

The ancient Goetia spellbooks were used for conjuring up demons and each demon had its own sigil and name.

IT & The Creature from the Subconscious ID

Stephen King captured the hearts of America with the release of his blockbuster smash hit book, It. The video features the
menacing face of a clown while the book reveals the clowns head as a skull with stars in the eye sockets.
The video jacket reads:

Your every fear all in the deadly enemy. It can be anything, a fanged monster that wont stay on the movie
screen, something ominous lurking in the basement or around the next corner. No matter what your biggest fear is,
no one knows IT better than Stephen King

The force takes the shape of a clown, but it isnt clowning around. Instead, it terrorizes youngsters with their
innermost fears, bringing them to untimely doom until a group of wily neighborhood kids fight back. Thirty years
later it resurfaces: meaner, angrier. And the friends who vividly remember the terrors of their youth reunite to make
a desperate final stand against it.

In an interview, King admits he was possessed during the writing of the book.

Let ItBe & Make ItSo

Sigmund Freud, the father of psychology, invented a model of the psyche which contained three parts to the self: the ego
(conscious mind), the superego (superconscious mind) and what he termed the id or the subconscious mind. This was the
realm of our fears: scary monsters and demons.
This id was considered a sort of third person subsistent to the conscious and superconscious mind. Of course, we use the
word it as a sort of third person as well in our use of speech. And, of course, subconsciously we have been programmed
to accept the abbreviated ID as our identity.

We unknowingly give power to this creature and help create it every day with our thought and speech. We watch the horor
movie It by Stephen King and associate all our deep dark subconscious fears with IT.

Likewise with the word thing (everything. anything, and nothing or no thing) and the use of ambiguous words such as
they (THEY live), them (If you cant beat em join them).

We chant the chorus to the song Let It Be over and over again. And its no coincidence that IT is the acronym that has been
curently assigned to the Information Technology field, or computers, for IT very well may be an artificial intelligence or
computer.
For a detailed analysis and many more examples of IT please reference my page on this phenomenon.

Extra! Extra! Click here to read all about IT.


We really need to learn to speak with a more conscious language in mind, ever aware of how we think our thoughts in our
minds and how we word our sentences!!

S- Lang

Consider the English letter S. First of all, it looks like a snake or serpent - one that has risen up and is ready to strike or if
viewed from overhead it looks like one that is perhaps crawling along. In two-dimensional space, it looks like a sideways
wave and in 3-D space it looks like a spiral, both paths that energy follows.
The letter s is used in English to denote possession, which is Satans specialty, by placing it at the end of a word with an
apostrophe. Plurality or the concept of multiplication or creation, is achieved by appending an s or es to a word.

These two facts, coupled with the sheer number of words in our language means the S sound is one of the most, if not
single most, frequently uttered sounds in our speech.

Although the vowels are used frequently, they have more than one sound associated with them, a long and short sound.

There are probably more esses used in our speech than any other sound. Virtually every sentence we speak contains one
or more of these hissing sounds. It would not be accurate to say we sound like hissing snakes when we speak, but our
incessant hissing probably reminds us of it at some level subconsciously.
Not only does the letter S physically represent the snake or serpent, phonetically it even sounds like a snake!! It sounds
exactly like the hissing sound a snake makes sssssssss when it shakes its tail. The word hiss even ends in a double-
s.

And, of course, the words snake and serpent are both s-words as well as Satan, who the Bible says took the form of a
snake. He was said to have told mankind a secret - that man would not die if he ate of the fruit.
Of course, when you want to tell someone a secret you say, pssssssst, come here or if you want to keep a secret you
say Shhhhhhhhhhhhh!!. The dollar sign, $, is the standard symbol for English currency.

Money is said to be the root of all evil. Not only does the S look like a snake (Satan), and sound like a snake, which is
known for shedding its skin, but nearly all words that begin with the letter s have a negative connotation associated with
them. That is why they can be considered s-words, or swords, because they can kill and injure like a sword.

These s-words are a seal or stamp associated with Satan, Satans Slang or s-lang. The word lang is defined in the
dictionary as an abbreviation for the word language.
Satan, the snake or serpent also known as Set, slithers about striving to snatch, steal, or strip us of
our souls or spirits and is obsessed with possessing or seizing them.

He, or she, is subtle, sly, sneaky, slick, slippery, scaly, secretive, scary, spins, spirals or screws into your soul and
possesses you and seizes your spirit.

Speech is his peach and when we speak, Satan is at his peak as far as deception is concerned. The words possesses,
obsesses, seizes contain a multiple s-sound and are words pertaining to control.
The word ess, which is defined as the pronunciation for the letter s, becomes the word esse when a silent e is added. The
word esse means to be which is where we get the word essence and the word essay which is sort of a written speech and
comes from the Old French esai which means to put to a test which is what Satan did to Jesus in the wilder-ness.

The suffix -ness also means a state of being, like loneliness or business. Its interesting that the Loch Ness in Scotland is
said to contain a serpent creature named Nessie which nests there.

Yes, Satan certainly is a Busy Ness when it comes to the business world and show business. And he specializes in
monkey business. One should keep this in mind before wishing for good-ness.
A partial list of s-words: sun, shine, soul, spirit, Satan, Samael, Set, sin, serpent, snake, salamander, hisses, siren, spell,
steal, scales, shed, skin, slither, slimy, slip, slide, shake, strike, scare, sly, sneak, stealth, secret, subtle, slash, slice, slay,
slit, shoot, strip, smack, smite, sword, spook, possesses, obsesses, spin, screw, smell, say, speak, salacious, spiral,
pssssssst, sssssssshhhh
Shit! I, mean, Sheesh! It is not easy to think of positive s-words and double ss words are even worse. The swastika
resembles two esses and the word swastika has two of them in number.
The Nazis had the SS and the ss logo which looked like lightening bolts.
The far reaching extent in which the spell our language has cast on us can be seen in the every day usage of cliche. Our
languages are saturated with what we like to call killer words and phrases because thats what they do. Englishmen use the
word bloody all the time bloody well right, they do!!! Some women are considered drop dead gorgeous and when they
are dressed to kill, they are to die for. She was a dead ringer for Marilyn Monroe.

If looks could kill they would because she will take your breath away.

Wouldnt you just kill for a date with her? Sometimes she really gets under my skin and burns me up, but if anyone tries to
hurt her, they would have to goover my dead body because I will punch their lights out if they get near her. Im serious
as a heart attack. Im dead serious.

She can be as mean as a snake at times, but she really knew how to kill em with kindness. I was dead set for her. I
could have just died right there. I mean, I felt like I had just died and gone to heaven.
Eat your heart out. She was a live wire, but at least I would go out in a blaze of glory.

I dont want to beat a dead horse, but she really took me for a ride. Of course, I wore my heart on my sleeve the whole
time, but I was scared to death I might lose her because you really have to keep your eyes peeled to find a good one. Not
to be a killjoy, but Im dead to the world around most women, dead as a doorknob.
Ok, that was overkill and painful to read, but it did make a point. Think about the terms we use when we wish good luck to
others. Break a leg, kid or Knock em dead! Or if someone borrows something from us we say, Go ahead, knock yourself
out. Even time is not immune to our sadistic waystime to kill, just killing time.
Why do Christians conclude their prayers by invoking the name of an Egyptian deity, Amen, who had the body of a man and
a rams head when Satan is depicted as a horned god having a goats head?

Why does the American dollar bill (known as a buck) have an Egyptian pyramid on its reverse side accompanied by the
Latin phrase Anuuit Coeptis Novus Ordo Seclorum which can be translated Announcing the Birth of a New World Order?
Why does the American military wear a chevron as an insignia patch when the word derives from the French
word chevre, which means goat, and On, the Egyptian City of the Sun?

If the word God traces back to the Indo-European root ghut- or the German gott, why does the changing of the vowel
from a short sound to a long sound render the word goat?
Why does Christmas, the birthday of the Son of God, coincide with the birthday of the Sun of God at the winter solstice, the
three days when the sun is at its lowest point on the Southern Cross, appears to stand still for three days, and then rises or
is born again?

Is this why Easter is celebrated during the Spring Equinox when the East Star, the Sun, has risen? Why is Santa an
anagram for Satan? What exactly does Old Nick really mean? And what is a jingle bell?
Why do we have company and product names like Chevron, Capri Sun, Shiner Bock, Star Bucks, and Sears and Roebuck?
What is a Sun Kist or a Star Kist? Why are sports contests called ball games and why do we idolize rock stars such as Kid
Rock?
The genre of Horror films possesses other creature features with It in the title. There was It Lives!, It Lives Again, It
Came From the Sea, It Came From Outer Space, and Its Alive! which is the expression Doctor Frankenstein made
famous when he brought his monster to life.

From the time we were young, we have been told over and over again that IT is a scary creature that this association has
become deeply embedded within the recesses of our mind.
On the Adamms Family, Cousin Itt was a monster. Itt communicated via a high speed gibberish that only members of the
Addams family seemed to understand.

Cousin Itts voice was provided by sound-effects engineer Tony Magro, who created Itts garbled responses by mouthing
gibberish into a tape recorder, with a ppffft and a thhhhhttt added for good measure, and then accelerating the tapes
recording speed.
The eyes have it. What do the eyes have? What or who is it? The eyes are the windows to the soul. In Saturday Night Live,
Dana Carvey played the Church Lady who asked, Could IT be Satan?

That IT refers to Satan can seen in the phrase when It rains, It pours. Satan, the goat God, is also known as Pan, the
Piper. The word gote, a variant spelling of goat, means a channel or pipe for water and comes from the Old English
word geotan which means to pour! So when It reigns, It pours.
When children play hide and seek, someone always has to be it. All the other children run and hide from whoevers it. It
then goes roaming around trying to find and capture whoevers not it. When someone is found they are tagged as the new
it - Tag, youre it!!
The Beatles Paul McCartney said the idea for the song Let it Be came to him in a dream. He chants the line over and over
and we all sing along almost willing it into existence.

Every time the song is played on the radio, thousands and thousands are sending forth thought and sound vibrations into
the air. We use the word it in our language over and over all the time. Could it be possible to manifest a creature from the
id, or from the subconscious? Think of these songs: Breads Make it with you,
The Scorpions Make it Real:

Make it real, not fantasy


Did you ever have a secret yearning?
Dont you know it could come true?
Nows the time to set wheels turning
To open up your life for you
As you know theres always good and evil
Make your choice, Dont be blind
Open up your mind and dont be trivial
Theres a whole new world to find
Make it real, not fantasy
The Michael Jackson song Who is it?
(Who is it?)
It is a friend of mine
(Who is it?)
Is it my brother?
(Who is it?)
Somebody hurt my soul
(Who is it?)
I cant take this stuff no more
In this song, Michael explains who IT is:
Can you feel it in the air
Ghosts be hiding everywhere
Im gonna be
Exactly what you wanna see
Its you whos haunting me
Youre warning me
To be the stranger
In your life
Am I amusing you
Or just confusing you?
Am I the beast
You visualized?
And if you wanna to see
Eccentricities
Ill be grotesque
Before your eyes
Let them all materialize