1.) Theory of Concentric Zones- Ernest W. Burgess (1929) 4. Medium Housing Evaluation Tools Zone I. the CBD lies at the center of the city 5. Superior Housing 1. Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA)- Simply described, the CBA Zone II. Is in transition. It is the crowded, multi-occupied zone of the requires the comparison project cost and benefits using city first invaded by migrants. Within the zone are the ghetto areas -View in housing areas in a city develop in sectors along the lines of economic prices. When CBA is applied, the economic costs (these are not necessarily slums). communication from the CBD outwards and benefits or a project are distinctly identified, Zone III. Are the working mens houses, the area of second generation - High quality areas run along roads & also reflect the Incidence of quantified and translated in monetary units and immigrants, one step up from Zone II higher ground compared. The outcome of such comparison assists a Zone IV & V. are residential - Industrial sectors develop along canals and railways, away from high planned in deciding whether to recommend the approval, Zone VI. For the better-off quality housing reject, defer or modify the project under consideration. Zone V. for the commuters - High residential areas will spread out along the lines of the sector by 2. Cost-Effective Analysis- Cost effective analysis was the addition of new belts housing beyond the outer arc of the city developed as a tool for program evaluation where it is -This theory was advance by H.Hoyt (1939) as an alternative to difficult, if not impossible, to quantify the cost and Burgess concentric model and was based on residential rent patterns benefits in monetary terms. in the USA. - Allows the evaluation and comparison of programs with 3.) Multiple Nuclei Theory- Chauncy D. Harris, Edward L. Ullman similar outputs without converting those outputs into (1945) money (check the diagram)---IMPORTAN DEYUM 3. Sensitive or Break-Even Analysis- A sensitive analysis - Harris and Ulliman combined elements of the Concentric alters some of the values previously assumed to be Zone theory and Sector Theory with certain other factors constant within an evaluation in order to see whether how to explain landuse much such changes would affect the outcome - Some nuclie are pre-existing settlements, others arise 4. Goals-Achievement Matrix Method- Follows a five-step from urbanization and external economies evaluation process: - Distinctive land-use zones develop because some a. List the objectives activities repel each other; high-quality housing does not b. Develop measures of each objective generally arise next to industrial areas, and other activities c. Weight each objective Circle diargram. cannot afford the high cost of the most desirable d. Evaluate the way each alternative meets each - All these zones are held to have evolved separately and without locations. objective planning. - New industrial areas develop in suburban locations since e. Select the best alternative - They result from the competition of different socio-economic groups they require easy access, and outlying business districts This method is based on the subjective assessment of objectives and for land. may develop for the same reason. the value of benefits and costs to particular groups. Matrix methods - Competition results in Variations in the cost of land and therefore are more comprehensive than cost-benefit methods; however, the Concentric Theory, Burgess (1929) causes segregation within a city assignment of weights to objectives in the matrix approach is 1. Central Business District Circular model (check in note) subjective and consequently open to criticism 2. Zone of transition - The model assumes 3. Zone of Independent Uniformly flat Procedure- First, a set of goals & objectives is formulated for the plan. Working Mens Housing Available land The measures of objectives are then defined so that progress toward 4. Zone of Better Residences Ignores the importance of transport routes the objectives can be gauged. Typically 5-point measurement scale is 5. Commuters Zone Relies on theory that city growth results from distinct The Sector Theory, 1939 used. Next, the relative importance of objectives is established waves of in-migrants, that is to invasion and succession through either a ranking procedure or a scoring procedure. Then, each 1. High Rent District - More applicable to cities in the USA than European cities. plans level of achievement of each objective is estimated and 2. Intermediate Rent The Concentric Zone Model: weighted by the values placed on the objectives themselves. Finally, 3. Low Rent Residences 1. Central Business District Zone I (MIDDLE) the alternatives of each plan to provide an overall index of 4. Education & Recreation 2. Transitional Zone- Zone II achievement 5. Transportation **Recent Immigrant groups 6. Industrial - Deteriorated Housing Multiple Nuclei, Ullman and Harris, 1945 - Factories 1. CBD in large cities within: - Abandoned Buildings a. Residential District 3. Working Class Zone- Zone III b. Financial District - Single Family Tenements c. Theatre District 4. Residential Zone- Zone IV d. Government District - Single Family Homes 2. Wholesale and Light Manufacturing Lower Class - Yards/Garages Residential 5. Commuters Zone 3. Lower Class Residential - Suburbs 4. Middle Class Residential 2.) Sector Theory- Homer Hoyt (1939) 5. Upper Class Residential 1. CBD 6. Heavy Manufacturing 2. Manufacturing 7. Business Subcenters 8. Residential and Dormitory Communities 9. Industrial Areas on the complexity, depending on the type and size of the proposed development 7. SWOT Analysis- A method that enables a planner to generate feasible alternative strategies through an assessment of the present conditions, characteristics, and current state. It is an important strategy-formulation matching tool that result in the development of 4 types of Legend Rating System strategies: 0= Option/Alternative does not contribute to the fulfilment of the a. SO Strategies - Strengths-Opportunities particular goal from the sectors point of view b. WO Strategies - Weakness-Opportunities += Option/Alternative does contribute to the fulfilment of the c. ST Strategies- Strengths-Threats particular goal d. WT Strategies- Weaknesses-Threats - = Option/Alternative is inconsistent with, or contradicts the goal -It is strategic planning tool used to evaluate the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats involved in project. Strengths Id the project contribution is (+) or (-), the extent of the contribution and Weaknesses are internal to an organization. It measures your shall be indicated using the following scale: internal capability. Opportunities and Threats originate from outside 1- Option/Alternative contributes slightly the organization. It refers to how external environment affects your 2- Option/Alternative contributes moderately group Involves making subjective judgement on objective information 3- Option/Alternative contributes greatly Example: SWOT Analysis for Tagaytay City Multiply the rating by the corresponding weight of the goal and enter the product score in the appropriate cell. Sum up the score algebraically up for each Option/Alternative, then add all sectoral group scores. The Option/Alternative with the highest total score is ranked as number one, the next number two, and so on
5. Planning Balance Sheet Method- also follows 5-step
evaluation process but differs from the goals-achievement method in several respects. Using comparable matrix, the balance sheet approach measures costs and benefits in monetary terms as much as possible. 6. Impact Analysis- The assessment and evaluation of the impacts of alternative options has always been an integral part of planning analysis. Process is formalized using a matrix and some type of scoring system. The factor to be taken into account in such analyses will vary according to the issue involved. Examples: a. Environmental Impact Analysis- effect of policies or projects on air and water quality, plant life, animals and human beings (social impact assessment. The Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is a documents that details the potential effects of a major development or project on its environmental pollution i. Social Impact Analysis- is 8. Ex-Post Evaluation- Following implementation, it is undertaken to ensure the project possible to invest time and resources in ex post evaluation. to responsive to the needs of the There can be evaluations of the programs/projects beneficiaries and the concerns of themselves and their actual costs and effectiveness, i.e., the group of people likely to be were our modes accurate? Did we properly understand affected by the project the problem, especially our causal modes of it and did we b. Fiscal Impact Analysis- concentrated on the properly project the impact of our solution. costs and benefits (in monetary terms) to the governmental unit concerned. It compares the government costs involved a project with the revenues or savings it is likely to generate c. Traffic Impact Studies- Assesses the effects that a particular developments traffic will have