INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee : _____________________ Name of Rater : JULIET A.

MAGALLANES, Ed.D.
Position : Education Program Supervisor Position : Chief EPS-CID
Review Period : ____________________________ Date of Review :
___________________________
Region / Division: Region IX- Zamboanga del Sur

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

MFO KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULT SCORE
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.
1. Division 1.1 Assisted in the 5-Outstanding
Plans enhancement and Assisted in the 100% assistance to
Preparation, Implementation of the enhancement of the DEDP DEDP and SIP Monthly
Monitoring Performed 4 specified
Division Education through the following:
and activities with
Evaluation Development Plan Served as member of the
supporting
(DEDP) and SIP. Division Planning team documents
Implemented activities
based on learning area /
program assigned
Assisted in the review /
assessment of SIP/AIP
on assigned surrogate
qualci with TA report.
Prepared & submitted
Monthly Monitoring report
on SIP/AIP
Implementation.
4-Very Satisfactory Performed 3 activities Quarterly
Assisted 80-89% in the with complete reports
enhancement of the
DEDP/SIP
 TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFO KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULT SCORE
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.
3-Satisfactory Performed 3 Semester
Assisted 70-79% in the activities with
enhancement of the incomplete reports
DEDP/SIP
2-Unsatisfactory Performed 2 Annually
Assisted 60-69% in the activities with
enhancement of the DEDP/ complete report
1-Poor
Assisted 59% and below in Performed 1 activity Annually
the enhancement of the with reports
DEDP/SIP DEDP/SIP

1.2 Prepared action 5-Outstanding Jan. June 2016

Plan on assigned area
Prepared Specific action
of instruction and
assisted in the plan on assigned area of
preparation, instruction and special
implementation and project or program
evaluation of AIPs, coordinated
projects/programs and Prepared guidelines on
activities on matters pertaining to
curriculum curriculum
development, implementation,
improvement of teacher/staff
teaching techniques development and school
and strategies and facilities Jan.-Dec. 2016
school facilities Provided technical
development in public assistance on
and private schools improvement of teaching
 strategies
Provided technical inputs on
school physical facilities

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

MFO KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULT SCORE
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.
Development
/improvement in both
public and private
schools.
4-Very Satisfactory
Jan.- December
4 activities undertaken
supported with reports
Jan.- December
3-Satisfactory

3 activities undertaken
supported with reports
Jan.- December
2-Unsatisfactory

2 activities undertaken
supported with reports

1-Poor Jan.- December

Only one activity undertaken

supported with report

2. 2.1 Conducted 5-Outstanding

Instructional instructional Prepared and submitted All requirements
Supervision supervision to 8 - 10 monthly instructional prepared and Every 10th day of the
and teachers / schools per supervisory plan submitted succeeding month
Monitoring month. Submitted consolidated
and Instructional and
 Evaluation Monitoring report to CID
Office every 10th day of
the succeeding month

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

MFO KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULT SCORE
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.
Conducted pre and post
conference with school
heads and teachers
Conducted classroom
observation to 6 to 10
teachers / schools

4- Very Satisfactory 3 requirements met Every 15th day of the

80-89% instructional with complete succeeding month
supervision conducted reports.
3-Satisfactory
70-79% instructional 2 requirements met Every 17th day of the
supervision conducted with complete succeeding month
2-Unsatisfactory reports
60-69% instructional
supervision conducted
1-Poor 1 requirement met Every 20th day of the
59% and below instructional with incomplete succeeding month
supervision conducted report

1 requirement met Every 25th day of the

with no reports succeeding month

2.2 Provides technical 5-Outstanding

assistance (field 100% technical assistance
technical asistance) to provided to school heads 10 school heads Monthly
school heads on on conduct of process provided technical
instructional observation assistance
 supervision and

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

MFO KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULT SCORE
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.
teachers on lesson 100% orientation provided to 20 teachers
planning teachers on lesson oriented on lesson
planning/ log sheets plan/ log sheet
preparation preparation
4-Very Satisfactory
80-89% technical assistance
provided to school heads
on conduct of process 8 school heads Monthly
observation with provided technical
supporting documents assistance
80-89% orientation provided
to teachers on lesson
planning/ log sheets
preparation 16 teachers
3-Satisfactory oriented on lesson
70-79% technical assistance plan/ log sheet
provided to school heads preparation
on conduct of process
observation with
supporting documents 6-7 school heads Monthly
70-79% orientation provided provided technical
to teachers on lesson assistance
planning/ log

2-Unsatisfactory
60-69% technical assistance 12-14 teachers
provided to school heads oriented on lesson
on conduct plan/ log sheet
preparation

4-5 school heads Monthly

provided technical
 assistance

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

MFO KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULT SCORE
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.
of process observation
with supporting documents
60-69% orientation provided
to teachers on lesson 10-11 teachers oriented
planning/ log sheets on lesson plan/ log
preparation sheet preparation
2-Unsatisfactory
59% and below technical 3 and below school
assistance provided to heads provided Monthly
school heads on conduct technical
of process observation assistance
with supporting
documents
59% and below orientation 9 and below teachers
provided to teachers on oriented on lesson
lesson planning/ log plan/ log sheet
sheets preparation preparation
 TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFO KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULT SCORE
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.
 TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFO KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULT SCORE
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.
 TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFO KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULT SCORE
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.
 TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFO KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULT SCORE
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.
 TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFO KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULT SCORE
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.
 TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFO KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULT SCORE
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.
 TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFO KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULT SCORE
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.
 TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFO KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULT SCORE
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.