Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Shane Hensinger
Professor Timothy Sisk – Civil Wars and International Responses II
Josef Korbel School of International Studies – University of Denver
1
Reimagining Reunification in Cyprus: Towards a Human-Centered Approach to
Negotiation and Peacebuilding on a Divided Island. .......................................................... 1
Executive Summary............................................................................................................. 4
Recommendations .............................................................................................................. 7
To the Republic of Cyprus ........................................................................................... 7
To the Turkish Cypriot Government: .......................................................................... 8
To the Government of Turkey: ................................................................................... 9
To the Government of Britain:.................................................................................. 10
To the Government of Greece:................................................................................. 10
To the European Union:............................................................................................ 11
To the United Nations:.............................................................................................. 11
Conflict Dynamics - Introduction ...................................................................................... 12
History............................................................................................................................... 13
British Rule .................................................................................................................... 13
Independence ............................................................................................................... 16
Post- Independence ...................................................................................................... 18
The Invasion of “Attila.”................................................................................................ 20
Visual Representation of the Decline of Bicommunal Villages in Cyprus..................... 22
Afterward ...................................................................................................................... 22
Peacemaking and Peacebuilding Strategies ..................................................................... 23
Environment.................................................................................................................. 24
Sports ............................................................................................................................ 26
Women’s Issues ............................................................................................................ 27
Educational Exchanges.................................................................................................. 28
Negotiation Dynamics - Introduction ............................................................................... 29
Negotiation ....................................................................................................................... 30
Bargaining Framework.................................................................................................. 30
Greek-Cypriot Bargaining Position................................................................................ 32
Turkish-Cypriot Bargaining Position.............................................................................. 33
Turkish, Greek and United States Negotiating Positions.............................................. 34
History of the Negotiating Process ................................................................................... 35
The Vienna Talks 1975 - 1977 ....................................................................................... 36
Factors Contributing to Failure of the Vienna Talks and Subsequent Rounds of
Negotiations.................................................................................................................. 37
The Annan Plan ................................................................................................................. 40
The European Union ..................................................................................................... 40
Turkish-Cypriots ............................................................................................................ 41
Turkey ........................................................................................................................... 42
Greek-Cypriots .............................................................................................................. 43
The Final Annan Plan (Annan V) ................................................................................... 44
The Defeat of the Annan Plan........................................................................................... 45
The Way Forward.......................................................................................................... 46
2
Peacebuilding in Cyprus................................................................................................ 48
Sequencing the Institutions of the Annan Plan ........................................................ 48
Peacekeeping in Perpetuity? – Drawing Down UNFICYP ......................................... 49
Peacebuilding on Cyprus - Introduction ........................................................................... 51
Horizontal Inequalities in Cyprus...................................................................................... 52
Text Box 1.................................................................................................................. 53
Table 1....................................................................................................................... 55
Table 2....................................................................................................................... 57
Table 3....................................................................................................................... 58
European Court of Human Rights Decision of March 2010.............................................. 58
Analysis of ECHR Decision................................................................................................. 60
Key Finding................................................................................................................ 61
Key Finding................................................................................................................ 62
Greek Cypriot Reaction to ECHR Ruling............................................................................ 62
Addressing Vertical Dilemmas on Both Sides of the Island .............................................. 64
Peacebuilding Conclusion ................................................................................................. 67
Report Conclusion............................................................................................................. 71
Appendix ........................................................................................................................... 73
Biblography ....................................................................................................................... 75
3
Executive Summary
The Cyprus conflict represents one of the most intractable and protracted conflict
situations in the world today, rivaling the Israeli-Palestinian conflict for length and
complexity it remains a seemingly intractable problem for the global community and in
particular for the United Nations and the European Union; the former of which is
charged with maintaining peace on Cyprus and the latter which admitted a divided
Cyprus as a full member in 2004 and now finds itself, somewhat unwillingly, as a party
to a conflict which previously had been viewed as existing on the periphery of Europe
but now, thanks to the growth of the European project, rests at its heart.
The conflict involves not only the two antagonists – the ethnic Turk and ethnic Greek
populations on the island but also their protectors in Turkey and Greece respectively,
who, along with Britain, were given roles as “guarantors” under 1960 Treaty of
Guarantee. In addition the United Nations peacekeeping force on the island, UNFICYP,
has since 1963 has been tasked with keeping peace between the two sides and since
1974 with enforcing a ceasefire between Turkey and the government of the Republic of
Cyprus. As a player trusted by both sides in Cyprus UNFICYP plays a key role within this
report – which recommends a “reimagining” of UNFICYP’s role, utilizing the trust it has
4
Even prior to the Turkish invasion in 1974 which led to the partition of the island, the
two majority communities on Cyprus, ethnic Greek and ethnic Turkish, had led parallel
existences with little social interaction and wide disparities in income and education.
Endless rounds of negotiations between the two parties have led to high level accords
and even, in 2004, an agreed upon peace plan (the Annan plan) but the failure of the
Greek Cypriot side to rally both elite and mass opinion to the side of reunification led to
its defeat and the subsequent entry of Cyprus as a divided island to the European Union.
This in turn resulted in growing embitterment on the part of the north, which felt its
cooperation and acceptance of the plan had led not to greater rewards but to a
mounting sense of stagnation and strangulation as their self-declared state, the Turkish
and sanctions.
A growing threat exists where both sides will become accustomed and accepting of the
below the level of official acceptance by the international community. This is not an
an acceptable alternative by both communities. Distrust between the two sides has
always been a major problem and is at the root of either side’s inability to imagine a
new way forward. Key recommendations within this report for mitigating the issue of
trust and separation include utilizing the non-political ties which bind all people
together – sports and the environment, to begin the process of building a sense of
5
Cypriot community separate from ethnic identity and ameliorating the decades of
inducements and rewards on the part of the international community, last month the
Turkish Cypriot side of the island elected a hard-line, nationalist president, Dervis
Eroglu, to replace their previous, pro-settlement leader – Mehmet Ali Talat. The
consequences of the election are as yet unknown but the position of Eroglu in talks with
the Republic of Cyprus is well known – no compromise on the key issue of the
Eroglu’s position, in combination with the stalling of EU-Turkish accession talks by the
Republic of Cyprus, spells trouble for the future of Cyprus as well as Turkey’s
relationship with the EU – the two of which are mutually and inseparably intertwined.
Turkey is increasingly losing patience with the European Union on both Cyprus and
other issues and believes it may never be offered membership while its client state, the
Cyprus is frozen and requires creative, new approaches to both in order to “thaw” and
“freshen” negotiation and peacebuilding dynamics on both halves of the divided island,
with the European Union and the United Nations both playing key roles – building off
their respective positions as a long-time guarantor of peace on the divided island and as
the main economic and diplomatic forum within the European theater.
6
The recommendations arising from this report seek to utilize the two communities on
centered approach which seeks to reimagine the conflict outside of round after round of
negotiations between high-level elites on both sides of the island. This, together with
incentives for the north and reassurances for the south on both the cost and benefits of
reunification, are designed to slowly warm this frozen conflict, as well as to refresh it by
inequalities, which were present on Cyprus long before the Turkish invasion, is designed
to decrease their role in the continuation of the conflict while building increasingly
strong economic ties between the two sides – which can only serve to remind both
Recommendations
1. Utilize the desire of many Turkish Cypriots to end to their international isolation
to the advantage of both sides of the island by actively seeking to involve their
7
government of the Republic of Cyprus claims to represent the entire island as
human beings and encourages them to establish greater ties with the Republic of
Cyprus. It also shows the world that the government remains committed to
preparation for the eventual reunification of the two sides of the island. The Republic of
Cyprus would also benefit by beginning this process now so it will not act as an
recognized in the recent European Court of Human Rights ruling as a just solution to the
issue of outstanding property claims in the north. The government does not have to
endorse the decision but by utilizing the commission it can remove a major source of
tension and sorrow between the two communities and at no cost to itself. Continuing
resistance to the IPC could result in much larger costs to the Republic of Cyprus in the
future. Recognize the value of the IPC and allow citizens to make their own choices in
the matter.
8
1. Encourage Turkey to drop its opposition to allowing full movement of Greek
Cypriot ships, aircraft and goods in and out of Turkish ports-of-entry. Doing so
will remove a major irritant between the two parties and encourage the
government of the Republic of Cyprus that the Turkish Cypriot community is not
automatically endorsing the Turkish position on every issue and thus is acting as
ownership and freeze construction on any disputed property currently until this
enormous drain on the ability of both sides of the island to come to a conclusion
administration with policing powers carried out by the United Nations or another
agreed-upon force.
1. Immediately lift the prohibition on ships, aircraft and goods from the Republic of
9
2. Being the process of a withdrawal of a small number of Turkish soldiers from the
north. This need be only a token number and is designed, again, to show
3. Prohibit any further settlement of Turkish nationals in the north. This is a major
issue for both the Turkish and Greek populations of the island and is illegal under
1. British sovereign bases occupy prime portions of Cyprus, areas which could be
between the two sides of the island. Reexamine the role of the bases and their
Cyprus are not always mutually inclusive and encouraging this falsity has
10
To the European Union:
1. Work with the Turkish side of Cyprus to begin the lengthy process of
utilizing the force, which has the trust of both sides in Cyprus, into one which works to
bring the two communities together through structured activities and peacebuilding
exercises and trips to each side of the island. Current examples of this approach include
meetings between businesses on both sides of the island. Consider expanding this
2. Create a plan to sequence some of the local institutions of governance envisioned in the
Annan plan to Varosha and the areas near Varosha in order to show both sides that co-
governance has a future in Cyprus. This plan could then be submitted to a vote in the
11
Conflict Dynamics - Introduction
The conflict in Cyprus resulting in the Turkish invasion of the island in 1974 and stalemating in
the subsequent partition and frozen dynamics which exist today, represents in many ways the
latest conflict between the Greek and Turkish states or a “significant part of the larger Greco-
Turkish issue with a thousand year history” (Yelmaz 35). Both the Greek-Turkish war of 1920 and
the Lausanne Treaty of 1923 ensured that both Greece and Turkey have “unmixed” their
populations to a degree quite remarkable considering the multiethnic nature of each state prior
to these events. Cyprus is the last territory where large numbers of ethnic Cypriot Greeks and
ethnic Cypriot Turks once lived together and where Greece and Turkey still have major roles to
play in resolving (or prolonging) conflict between the two communities. A major, unresolved
irritant in relations between the two states is Cyprus and the problems of that island have
followed a path which closely parallels that of each respective community’s “benefactors” in
The dynamics of conflict in Cyprus between the ethnic Turkish community and the ethnic Greek
community have been heavily influenced by the fact that each community is watched over and
“guaranteed” by an outside power – Greece takes a paternal interest in the Greek community
and Turkey does the same with the Turkish community (the title of this project refers to what
Turks refer to as “Motherland and Babyland,” “Motherland” being Turkey and “Babyland” being
Cyprus). This arrangement, guaranteed by the 1960 Constitution of Cyprus, has resulted in the
two communities following the same dynamic their ethnic kin in Turkey and Greece have
12
followed in relation to one another – namely the “interpretation of present events through the
The challenge then is to wean each community away from this dynamic and encourage the
development of a Cypriot identity separate from reliance on the ethnic or religious identity of
either of the guarantors of Cyprus’s two major communities. In this report as well as the ones
measures which we hope will build the confidence of both communities in one another and in
the Cypriot state outside of its current reliance on the “guarantor” powers of Turkey and
Greece.
History
There is significant disagreement as to relations between the two communities before the
British assumed control of Cyprus in 1878. Greek Cypriot writers tend to mention the 1832
execution of the Cypriot Orthodox archbishop and clergy by the Ottoman Empire for alleged
sympathies with those seeking independence for Greeks (Yelmas 39). But in the period after the
British took control of Cyprus it can generally be agreed that “Greek Cypriot and Turkish Cypriot
209).
British Rule
13
The British “allowed the communities to set up separate school systems, both of which
imported teachers from the respective mainlands who taught children to see themselves as
“Greek” or “Turkish, not “Cypriot.” History in each community, from well before the possibility
of Cypriot independence until today, has represented its own people as consistently heroic and
This account is supported by Greek Cypriot writer Yiannis Papadakis who writes that in school in
Cyprus he learned “the Turks were nomads, people with no civilization, people of the horse and
the sword, descendants of the Mongols, infidels, people of no real religion. People of the Koran,
Muslim fanatics… Every important date in our history as Greeks bespoke our encounters with
Turkish teachers came to Cyprus bearing the new ideologies of “Kemalism” from Turkey’s new
secular ruler – Ataturk. Ataturk had switched the communal, Islamist vision of the former
Ottoman rulers to his new Turkish-based Kemalist ideology, which emphasized nationalism as
the binding force of Turkish identity – abandoning allegiance to the caliphate, which Ataturk
abolished in 1924. “By identifying with Ataturk’s vision of Turkish nationalism, the Turks of
Cyprus were also asserting their sense of separate identity from their Greek Cypriot neighbors”
(Yelmaz 43).
Language was also a source of separation on the island with few Greek Cypriots speaking Turkish
but approximately 40% of Turkish Cypriots speaking Greek. As the two communities began their
process of self-segregation less and less members of the “other” community learned their
14
neighbor’s language - meaning contacts between the two became increasingly limited (Fisher
309).
Strengthened by the acquired knowledge that each respective community was in the “right” and
the other in the “wrong” both communities began the process of gradual separation from one
another and greater identification with their ethnic/religious kin in the “mother/fatherland.”
For Greek Cypriots this took the form of enosis (union) with the Greek state. In 1912 and 1931
there were pro-enosis riots in Cyprus. These were followed by a growing sense of Turkish
Cypriot nationalism which led to demands for taksim (partition) of the island.
After WWII the anti-colonialist wave which swept much of the world also reached Cyprus. In
1955 EOKA (National Organization of Cypriot Fighters) was formed to fight the British for Cypriot
independence. EOKA was also closely identified with the cause of enosis and the Orthodox
church and was exclusively Greek – thus encouraging another, exclusively Turkish organization
called TMT (Turkish Defense Organization) to form which further divided the two communities.
Distrust built further because TMT aligned itself with British colonialists and engaged in “limited
intercommunal fighting with the Greek Cypriots until a ceasefire was implemented in 1958”
(Fisher 310). This trend of separate structures and institutions for each community also
for both Turkish Cypriot and Greek Cypriot votes before independence or after (Kaufmann 210).
The period between 1891 and 1931 saw the unmixing of previously ethnically-mixed villages in
15
Independence
Cyprus gained independence in 1960 following the armed struggle for independence waged by
EOKA since 1955. Under the 1960 constitution power was to be shared between a Greek Cypriot
president and a Turkish Cypriot vice-president who was given veto power. The 1960 constitution
was remarkably complex and created a power-sharing system which allowed the Turkish Cypriot
population a larger share of seats in the legislature (30%), civil service (30%), army (40%) and
police (30%) than their share of the population at that time, which was estimated to be around
20% of the total of Cyprus (Kaufmann 210). The constitution also “incorporated the guarantee
treaty between Cyprus, Greece, Turkey and Britain” which outlawed enosis and taksim and
allowed Greece, Turkey or Britain to take steps to unilaterally remedy a breach of the treaty.
Finally the constitution separated Greek Cypriot and Turkish Cypriot voters into separate ethnic
rolls which further institutionalized ethnic separation and prevented the development of cross-
community candidates from emerging at all. “This meant that Greek Cypriots could only vote for
Greek Cypriot candidates and Turkish Cypriots could only vote for Turkish Cypriot candidates.
Political parties with candidates of different ethnic affiliation could not stand for elections”
(Jarstad 28).
This complex document, designed with what the negotiators thought were the best interests of
both communities at heart, instead held the seeds of the destruction of bicommunal existence
on Cyprus. The president of Cyprus at the time, Archbishop Markarios, never supported the
take into account “the psychological and sociological fact that the power-protection system”
16
increased “suspicions, antagonism and conflict between the communities because of the
discriminations and uncertainties involved.” “The sectarian and divisive provisions of the 1960
arrangement constituted the seeds that led to its collapse three years later” (Michael 26).
The consocialistic model of power sharing as laid out in the 1960 Cypriot constitution was a
failure for the reasons stated above and because it did nothing to encourage consensus
between competing factions within the government (Large & Sisk 100). Of course there existed
The “birth” of Cyprus as an independent state more closely resembled that of an arranged
marriage neither party wanted – with both parties in love with different suitors who hovered at
the edge of the wedding yet refused to say “I object” when asked. “Independence” wasn’t
wanted by the vast majority of Greek Cypriots, who desired enosis with Greece, nor by the
Turkish Cypriots, who saw independence as a stalking horse for enosis by the Greek Cypriots.
The mood of the new state was bleak, “there were no festivals, no ringing of church bells, no
parades, no dancing people in the streets of Cyprus celebrating independence” (Yelmaz 55). The
mood of the people of Cyprus was predictive –the years ahead wouldn’t hold much joy or
17
Post- Independence
The constitutional arrangement quickly proved unworkable because “both identity groups
remained adversarial… with each seeking to gain advantages within the new arrangements”
(Fisher 310). “None of it functioned – except one provision that permitted Greece and Turkey to
maintain several hundred troops on the island, who became trainers and commanders of the
nationalist militias in both communities” (Kaufman 210). The 1960 constitution froze the
situation and provided an unworkable framework in which to resolve issues of dispute – which
neither party was willing to do. Both sides adhered strictly to their ethnic identity and no
mechanisms were put in place to foster even the beginning of a Cypriot identity separate from
ethnicity. Statements from both Greek and Turkish Cypriots contributed to this sense of ethnic
exclusion, with Makarios saying when first elected president in 1959 that “For the first time in
centuries, the government of the island passes into Greek hands” and Turkish Cypriot leaders
saying they couldn’t be “tools of Turkey” because they were part of Turkey (Yelmaz 58-59).
In addition the agreement was dependent on stable power relations between the two sides and
the other parties to the agreement (Greece, Turkey and Britain). When one side felt the power
relations had shifted it could simply abandon the agreement or seek to change it unilaterally –
as Makarios did later. Power relations can shift because of changing military capacities,
In 1963 after Makarios unilaterally threatened to change the constitution the two sides
embarked “on a hostile and protracted process of separation and segregation” (Fisher 310).
Intercommunal violence broke out “shortly before Christmas 1963” when British forces left their
sovereign bases and intervened to halt the violence – establishing the “Green Line” which still
18
divides Nicosia today (Souter 662). They were followed by the deployment of a United Nations
peacekeeping force (UNFICYP), which remains in Cyprus. In 1964 Turkey threatened to intervene
in Cyprus but after strong warnings from the United States used only air power in support of its
The outcome of Makarios’s rejection of the constitution and the following intercommunal
violence was a large number of internally displaced persons (IDP), mainly Turkish Cypriots, who
coalesced into a series of small fortified “enclaves run by the community’s political leaders”
(Souter 662). These enclaves occupied less than 3% of Cyprus’s total land area but held almost
18% of its population. Movement to and from the enclaves was restricted and those inside felt
“It is difficult to overestimate the magnitude of the 1964 crisis for the Turkish Cypriot
community. This was a seminal event for them. The Greek Cypriots failed to comprehend the
significance of the 1964 crisis in the Turkish Cypriot narrative. Their inability to to grasp the
centrality of this “chosen trauma” only compounded the “mistrust factor” in any prospective
endeavor toward coexistence and reunification. Cast in bereaved language, the 1964-1974 trial
would underline all future negotiating predispositions for the Turkish Cypriots” (Michael 27).
After the events of 1964 “the remainder of the 1960s and the early 1970s saw continuing
hostility and increasing segregation between the two communities, punctuated by intermittent
crises sparking Turkish involvement and repeated calls for enosis by nationalist elements in the
19
The events of 1964 represent a “chosen trauma” by the Turkish Cypriots – an event which has
gathered in their historical memory and has become mythologized by the group. Each group
accuses the other of refusing to understand or acknowledge its suffering and then mythologizes
a particular period of suffering, “Once a terrible event in a group’s history becomes a chosen
trauma, the truth about it does not really matter” (Yelmaz 10). “One of the biggest problems is
that people tend to forget what the others suffered and remember only their own sufferings.
We went through difficult times in 1963 but Greek Cypriots never mention these. But Greek
Cypriots went through difficult times in 1974. But the Cyprus problem did not start in 1974”
(Papadakis 109).
By 1970 the percentage of ethnically-mixed villages in Cyprus had fallen to less than 10% (Fisher
310).
Turkey’s invasion of Cyprus in July 1974 is the event which led to the partition of the island and
the forced displacement of over 250,000 Greek Cypriots. For Greek Cypriots this event, hailed as
“liberation” by Turkish Cypriots, was as traumatizing as the 1964 crisis and subsequent exile to
In response to a coup engineered in Athens by the right-wing junta then in power and led by
Cypriot Nikos Sampson, characterized as “an extremely violent man… well-known for his hatred
of Turks” who once advocated “cleansing the island of the stench of Turks,” Turkey began a two-
part invasion designed to “establish facts on the ground.” (Webb & Groom 85, Kaufmann 214).
20
The first part of the invasion, on July 20th, was followed by ethnic cleansing of Cypriot Turks from
Greek-held areas almost immediately (Kaufmann 214). On August 14th, following the end of talks
in Geneva between the four guarantor powers designed to seek a settlement to the previous
round of fighting, Turkey attacked again and pushed inwards from the beachheads it had
established, causing greater displacement of people, both Greek Cypriots heading south (away
from the Turkish invasion) and Turkish Cypriots heading north (towards the occupied areas) and
eventually occupying almost 37% of the island (Yilmaz 65). For Greek Cypriots the events of
1974 leading up to the invasion of Turkey, constitute their own “chosen trauma” in the same
manner the events between 1964 and 1974 mean to the Cypriot Turkish population.
The toll on the people of Cyprus was fierce. 4000 Greek soldiers and Cypriots were killed as well
as 2000 Turkish soldiers. The Turkish army “committed rapes and killed women and children”
(Kaufmann 215). Over 1500 people today are still considered “disappeared” by their families.
Almost no Turkish Cypriots remained in the south of Cyprus while less than 10,000 Greek
Cypriots remained in the north – many of whom would be later placed under great pressure to
reduced the mixed communities in each state. Today less than 300 Greek Cypriots remain in the
Turkish-occupied areas of Cyprus, mainly in the remote Karpas Peninsula. Figures on the number
of Turkish Cypriots in the south – the internationally recognized Republic of Cyprus, are
Each side has its own narrative for every significant event which has occurred in the history of
Cyprus. “The year 1974 perpetuated the image of the “unspeakable” Turk as Orthodox
21
Hellenism’s eternal enemy, out to expel them from their ancestral homeland, in a melancholic
fatalism colored by betrayal, defeat and loss. Conversely 1974 is heralded as a “peace
operation” and celebrated by Turkish Cypriots as “an antidote to Greek Cypriot oppression”
(Michael 32). Neither side appears willing to acknowledge the other’s narrative – not accept but
acknowledge. The principle of “the ego of victimization” doesn’t allow empathy for one’s
compatriot’s pain – when one suffers then the other must suffer in return (Yilmaz 66).
Afterward
The conflict in Cyprus has been stalemated since 1974. Contrary to the low-level ethnic violence
which occupied the island from between 1955 and 1974 there have been very few incidents
since the Turkish invasion – primarily or wholly because the two populations are unmixed now
to the point where very, very few Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots still live in close proximity
to one another.
22
Because this project is broken into two parts – conflict and escalation analysis followed by
peacemaking analysis at a later date, we will not go any further into the history of the conflict as
The conflict in Cyprus is complex and clouded with issues of ethnic nationalism, discrimination
(and fear of discrimination), the use of enemy images to stereotype the “other” as barbaric and
less than human, the over-involvement of guarantor powers Greece and Turkey in their co-
religionists affairs which has resulted in a stunted and nearly non-existent Cypriot identity and a
decades-long enforced separation which has allowed all of these elements and more to harden
together until each side is almost incapable of moving from its rehearsed role and seeing half-
way to the other’s position. The adoption of chosen traumas, chosen glories, the egoism of
victimization and hard-held religious and ethnic identities by both sides in the dispute present a
peacebuilding strategies.
Yet there are areas of agreement which can be approached as cross-border efforts and which do
not require huge sacrifices on either side. These areas can then be used as confidence-building
measures to draw the two sides closer to one another and to work towards building a Cypriot
identity free of reliance on religious or nationalistic shibboleths. Several of the issues (women
and the environment) recommended here for cross-community cooperation are mentioned as
23
“instrumental in confidence building and in establishing a settlement that can be acceptable to
the larger population” in other research, particularly in those dealing with conflict in
The European Union (EU) has taken the initiative in some of these areas but unfortunately in the
EU, where the Republic of Cyprus is a full member and the north and Turkey are not, “Greek
Cypriots… have eagerly used all the levers available to them to pursue what they see as their
national interest and need for justice” (ICG 3). If opportunities for building cross-border
cooperation are stymied in the EU then countries should make the decision to pursue these
opportunities unilaterally – as Britain and the United States appear to be doing in certain areas –
Environment
Sports
Women’s Issues
Educational Exchanges
Environment
Cyprus occupies a unique spot in the Mediterranean and features a huge number of species,
plant and animal, which aren’t located elsewhere. In addition Cyprus serves as a nesting location
for numerous rare sea turtles which have actually rebounded in number since the Turkish
invasion due to the low number of tourists known to visit the Turkish-occupied north. As writer
24
Alan Weisman wrote when visiting abandoned Varosha, “At night, the darkened beachfront,
free of moonlight bathers, crawls with nesting loggerhead and green sea turtles” (Weisman 97).
The resurgence of the natural environment into the void left by humans can be a comforting
and uniting factor if managed well. The Environment and Security Initiative (ENVSEC), a project
formed between the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), United
Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the United Nations Development Programe
(UNDP) could serve as a framework within which to develop a process for cross-border
cooperation on issues of mutual concern between the two parts of Cyprus today (United
Nations 25).
A main issue sure to arise is that the Republic of Cyprus doesn’t want to provide legitimacy to
the Turkish-occupied north, which declared independence in 1983. But the environment is an
issue which doesn’t respect artificial boundaries across land, air or sea. Tackling issues of joint
concern between both communities, issues like ensuring sea turtles have clean beaches on
which to nest, the status of Cyprus’s native donkey population or discussing ways to mitigate
the effects of a dropping water table can be approached as joint-initiatives, if necessary done
organizations.
The water issue, in particular, has been mentioned as having the potential to “function both as a
unifier promoting collaboration between entities at different levels and scales but also an
irritant worsening already bad relations” (Strand 191). Using Cyprus’s dropping water table as
25
“an opportunity to ensure structure dialogue with groups in the two communities” could be
enormously valuable in building ties between the two groups (Strand 192).
Sports
the right to participate in sporting events outside of Turkey. Forming joint sports teams between
the Republic of Cyprus and the Turkish-occupied north could form a valuable source of cross-
border attachment and appreciation. The Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) has a
football team which, because of the TRNC’s disputed status, cannot play in international FIFA
tournaments. A team from Cyprus playing together, perhaps under a jointly agreed upon
symbol, would act to bring the two sides together in a way they haven’t been for decades.
The Olympics are designed to bring the world’s states together in peace and harmony, united
under the Olympic banner and committed to the ancient ideals of sportsmanship. Because the
TRNC isn’t a recognized state it has no Olympic committee, any athlete who wanted to
participate would be forced to get a Turkish passport and compete under the flag of Turkey. And
the Republic of Cyprus up to this point has never won a metal in the Olympics – winter or
summer. Approaching the Olympic committee in the south to accept and train athletes from the
north, who could perhaps compete under a neutral banner until reunification was achieved (in
the same manner as Taiwan) could serve as a visible and successful example of cooperation
across the divide. If objections were to arise bringing the issue of Greece’s adoption of ethnic
Greek minorities from the Pontus (Paraskevi Patoulidou) and Albania (Pyrros Dimas) to compete
26
for Greece in the Olympics (each who won a gold metal) could serve as an important reminder
of the role athletes from the TRNC could play in the Olympics on behalf of all Cypriots.
Women’s Issues
Reams of data show us that the less participation of women in government and society the
more repressive and warlike a state turns out to be. Disenfranchising half of one’s population is
a road to ruin whereas enfranchising women can act as a locus for advancement and prosperity.
Recognizing the valuable role women can play in peacebuilding the United Nations Security
Council passed resolution 1325 in 2000, which called for broader participation for women in
conflict resolution and “that involve women in all the implementation mechanisms of the peace
Because “in conflict societies, the ‘national problem’ historically dominates downplays social
issues, including women’s issues” too often the concerns of women and their ideas for resolving
conflict have been downplayed or ignored (Hadjiipavlou 238). Women are enlisted in the
conflict as “sacrificing mothers” who “internalize their ethnic and national duty roles in
safeguarding the nation” (Hadjiipavlou 238). As such they “are denied their right to be full
participants in the peace process” on both sides. “In the last 30 years of official negotiations, no
Cypriot women has ever been appointed a member of the negotiating team” (Hadjiipavlou 238).
Because Cyprus is seen as a patriarchal culture this is accepted as normal but even within
societies viewed as patriarchal women still have opinions and unique perspectives – and their
27
absence from the political discourse is neither healthy nor wise for government, society or for
women themselves.
The UNDP has funded (2006 – 2008) a $30,000,000 project in Cyprus based on mainstreaming
women’s participation in peacemaking efforts on the island (UNDP). A report is expected soon
on its results but a greater effort must be made to bind women from the Republic of Cyprus and
the TRNC together in cross-border groups discussing issues of concern to women. As the UNDP
has taken a lead role so far it could continue to do so – or delegate additional responsibilities to
gender-based NGOs eager to help build the process of peacebuilding forward (Georgiadu 1).
Educational Exchanges
Because of the international isolation of the TRNC students from the statelet often have to
procure Turkish passports to study abroad and are only allowed to study in Cyprus once they
both the Republic of Cyprus and the TRNC could study on each side of the dividing line would be
enormously beneficial in breaking down the negative stereotypes each community holds of the
other. A more immediate impact would be a growing number of citizens of each ethnic group
with the ability to speak the language of the other. It would also lift some of the sense of siege
which the Turkish Cypriot community feels under and encourage greater ties between the two
educational communities.
28
The next portion of this report will move on to the negotiation dynamics present in the decades
of face-to-face talks between parties involved in the Cyprus dispute but primarily focusing on
talks between the Greek-Cypriots and the Turkish-Cypriots overseen by the UN Secretary-
This report will present an analysis of the negotiating strategies of the Greek-Cypriot
and Turkish-Cypriot sides in the Cyprus conflict since the Turkish invasion of 1974. The
focus will be in particular on the negotiation processes involved in the formulation the
Annan plan in 2004 and how both sides’ bargaining positions have evolved (or devolved)
Turkish invasion in 1974. This project will be relying heavily on the processes laid out by
negotiation processes between the two sides and the theoretical concept of “ripeness”
as applied to the Cyprus situation after the invasion of Turkey in 1974 and preceding EU
accession in 2004, while looking to the applicability of the ripeness concept to current
20101.
1
Sisk’s work is strongly applicable in the sense that he outlines a powerful case for “Peacemaking with
Power” and negotiations leading to the building of effective and durable power-sharing institutions, both of
which resonate strongly in the case of Cyprus. Intertwined in Sisk’s recommendations is the issue of
bringing peace to warring parties, which is slightly less applicable to Cyprus due to the cessation of
intercommunal violence more than ¼ of a century ago. The major issues in Cyprus have morphed from
those centered around security in the traditional sense to those centered around the type of consociational
model and confidence buildings measures (CBMs) necessary to convince both communities to accept a
final agreement.
29
The final piece will be analyzing the negotiation process for its applicability and
imagined in the Annan plan. Specific policy recommendations will be offered towards
the goal of peacebuilding in Cyprus based on the models offered by the Annan plan. A
perspective, the various institutions of the Annan plan to different parts of the island,
both Greek-Cypriot and Turkish-Cypriot, which were more supportive of the Annan plan
Negotiation
Bargaining Framework
The framework within which negotiations between the two sides in Cyprus have been
conducted has been set by UN, in particular by a number of UN Security Council (UNSC)
and General Assembly resolutions. The Secretary-General of the UN has been assigned
by the Security Council as a “monitor” of the talks under UNSC Resolution 353. UNSC
Resolutions 359, 360, 364, 365 and 367 further established and then strengthened the
30
General Assembly Resolution 3212 (XXIX) in November 1974 “officially endorsed the
preliminary intercommunal talks as the main negotiating model for resolving the Cyprus
Assembly resolutions are declarations without force of international law the UNSC
passed Resolution 367 affirming the General Assembly resolution which “established
intercommunal talks as the sole legitimate negotiating process and confirmed the
The bargaining framework put in place by the UN guaranteed the primacy of the
intercommunal talks as the sole bargaining framework which would be utilized going
that all refugees be allowed to return to their homes and urging the withdrawal of all
foreign troops from Cyprus the UN also endorsed a number of elements in the Greek-
Cypriot bargaining position, which had the effect of ensuring that the Turkish-Cypriot
side would always be operating from a “legitimacy deficit” in the eyes of the
2
GA Resolution 3212, in part : 1. Calls upon all states to respect the sovereignty, independence, territorial
integrity and non-alignment of the Republic of Cyprus and to refrain from all acts and interventions
directed against it; 2. Urges the speedy withdrawal of all foreign armed forces and foreign military
presence and personnel from the Republic of Cyprus and the cessation of all foreign interference in its
affairs; 5. . Considers that all the refugees should return to their homes in safety and calls upon the parties
concerned to undertake urgent measures to that end;
3
UNSC Resolution 367: “Requests the Secretary General accordingly to undertake a new mission of good
offices and to that end to convene the two parties under new agreed procedures and to place himself
personally at their disposal, so that the resumption, the intensification and the progress of comprehensive
negotiations, carried out in a reciprocal spirit of understanding and of moderation under his personal
auspices and with his direction as appropriate, might thereby be facilitated (United Nations).
31
international community and would contribute to a perception of the balance of power
The bargaining position of the two parties directly involved in the Cyprus conflict, the
Greek-Cypriot and Turkish-Cypriot sides, was each informed by the events of 1974,
when Turkey invaded the island in response to a coup engineered by the junta in
with Greece, laid out its positions, which came to be known as “the Athens doctrine”
the conflict. The Republic of Cyprus’ recognition by the international community as well
as its membership in multilateral institutions like the United Nations and (eventually)
the European Union has resulted in an asymmetrical balance of power between the two
32
sides (Schiff 390). Looking at the issue while applying Timothy Sisk’s perspective on
always ascendant against the Turkish-Cypriot side. This has resulted in a “polarizing
condition, perpetuating conflict and not leading to avenues for resolution.” (Sisk 43).
In sharp contrast to the position of the Greek-Cypriot side the Turkish-Cypriots regarded
the Turkish invasion in 1974 as legal under Turkey’s guarantor powers. Their negotiation
conditions reflected this reality and also their belief that the Republic of Cyprus as
established under the 1960 constitution was no longer valid. The position of the Turkish-
Cypriot side was in large part an attempt to lock in their gains since 1974 and consisted
of the following:
legitimacy. The Turkish Cypriots operated under a strict international embargo which
impacted every area of life in Turkish Cyprus including the ability to travel abroad, to
33
participate in international sports competitions, receive international loans and many
the international community and it received no international backing other than that of
the Turkish government. During most of the negotiation phrase leading up to the Annan
plan the Turkish-Cypriot side was punished with a number of coercive measures and
offered almost no non-coercive ones, a balance of which is necessary “to induce the
This isolation would negatively affect the psyche of the Turkish-Cypriot side, causing an
imbalance in the perception of the symmetry of power between the two sides, and
would contribute to a position of defiance on the part of the Turkish-Cypriots which was
Additionally “the Greek Cypriot economic and political embargo, aimed at preventing
separateness,” which did not bode well for peacebuilding efforts during the negotiation
4
I am not endorsing the declaration of independence on the part of the TRNC but I am stating that their
isolation and the lack of incentives extended to the Turkish Cypriots caused a hardening of their negotiating
position which led to the independence declaration.
34
The Turkish and Greek states, as guarantor powers under the 1960 Constitution of the
Republic of Cyprus, also had a place at the negotiating table where their positions
Greece followed the slogan “Cyprus Decides and Greece Follows” while Turkey adopted
a paternalistic approach towards the Turkish Cypriot state. The Turkish Republic was
heavily involved in the governance and subsidization of the Turkish-Cypriot state from
The US has been characterized as “the most important non-primary player in the
dispute (Michael 65).US strategy in the conflict was primarily concerned with keeping
Cyprus out of the Soviet orbit and maintaining peace between NATO allies Greece and
Turkey. US policy has also been influenced by the role of the politically important Greek-
American political lobby in the United States. The US, since the failure of the Nimetz
proposals in 1978, has tended to play a background role to that of the UNSG.
multiparty mediation held under the auspices of the United Nations Secretary General
(UNSG). These efforts have included representatives of the Greek and Turkish Cypriot
sides and at times the guarantor powers of Turkey & Greece as well as secondary
powers like the United States. In this section I will focus on the major negotiating efforts
35
in Cyprus including the talks mediated by UNSG Kurt Waldheim which resulted in high
level agreements and then focus on the only agreement to have ever been submitted to
The “Vienna Talks” held between the two sides under the auspices of the UNSG and the
bargaining framework laid out by UNSC Resolution 367 comprised several rounds of
negotiations from 1975 – 1977 and collapsed upon the death of Cypriot President
Markarios, after which new negotiations took place under different monikers.
The Vienna talks were plagued by a lack of convergent interests and expectations on all
sides. One side would come to the table with a proposal on governance and the other
would respond with proposals on territoriality. The UN was hampered by the distrust of
the Turkish-Cypriot side, which was angered at numerous UN resolutions affirming its
opponent’s negotiating points and thus couldn’t act as a “powerful peacemaker.” The
Greek-Cypriot side had successfully internationalized the issue and knew it was in an
While several “High Level agreements” were negotiated over the years of negotiation
they all suffered from ambiguity on terms, in particular the use of “bicommunal” as a
reference point. There was a point of agreement in 1978 on the issue which was seen as
a major concession by the Greek side when it acknowledged that there would be
36
separate control by each community of different parts of the island. This concession
A ripe moment, as discussed by Sisk, usually occurs during the process of prenegotiation
and is “a high-risk strategy, as the opposing party may seize upon a sign of conciliation
as weakness and, rather than responding with a reciprocal act of conciliation, may
“defect” or escalate in order to take advantage of the perception of weakness” (Sisk 46).
There was no further concession on the part of the Turkish-Cypriot side which was
symbolic of the lack of a convergence of interests between the two sides that plagued
From an analytical framework on negotiation the following appear as the lead causes of
the failure of the Vienna Talks and the subsequent rounds of negotiations leading to the
Annan plan. These factors are not listed in any particular order.
The perception of security from each side’s perspective was radically different. Each
party also saw its “sphere of power” differently and resented the power of the other,
37
but as time would move on each party’s “sphere” would grow or shrink proportionally
to the other and actions such as UN resolutions buttressing the Greek-Cypriot side
(which was a deliberate and strategically important attempt by the Republic of Cyprus
balance of power in the situation (Michael 75). As illustrated in the section on the
Throughout the history of the Vienna talks and through subsequent rounds of
negotiations another critical element was missing – the lack of third-party guarantees
necessary to assist both sides in bridging the security dilemma which existed between
agreement and in the case of Cyprus neither party was prepared to accept the
standing amongst the two sides then stepped forward, leaving this critical element
unfulfilled.
Talks between the two sides were also hampered by the lack of a “mediator with
power,” as Sisk calls it. The United Nations did not have the ability to offer a package of
non-coercive and coercive inducements to both sides. Because the UN was operating
under specific UNSC resolutions which had recognized a number of the bargaining
positions of the Greek-Cypriots its ability to act as a “powerful peacemaker… with the
38
[ability] to exercise strategic strength in leveraging the parties into peace” was limited
by the self-imposed conditions under which it operated (Sisk 156). As talks were
mandated to be conducted under the auspices of the UN, a body which repeatedly
passed resolutions the Turkish-Cypriot side felt were in opposition to their negotiating
position, this created a situation where the Turkish-Cypriot side would increasingly
come to view the UN as a not a partial mediator but one biased in favor of the Greek-
Cypriots. Whether this is true or not is unimportant, for what matters most in the
All of the factors discussed in this section are critical to the success of any peacemaking
effort. The appearance of any one of them is troubling; the appearance of four would
directly responsible for the failure of the Vienna talks. Because none of them were
successfully ameliorated they have also played a role in the failure of subsequent
Fact Point 1
In 1983, in response to a UNGA assembly which demanded the withdrawal of all Turkish troops
from the island, the return of refugees to their homes and which called on all states to assist the
government of the Republic of Cyprus to exercise “its full and effective control over the entire
territory of Cyprus,” the Turkish-Cypriots declared the independence of the Turkish Republic of
Northern Cyprus (TRNC). No country other than Turkey recognized the TRNC and today Turkey
remains the only country to have done so.
39
The Annan Plan
The Annan Plan as submitted to the voters of Cyprus in April of 2004 was a product of
prenegotiation and negotiation from 2002 – 2004, but its creation through negotiation
was a product of the convergence of a number of different interests of primary and on-
primary actors to the Cyprus situation. The plan can be considered the product of a
“ripe moment” which was catalyzed by the decision of UNSG Kofi Annan to approach
discussed earlier which had led to the failure of other negotiation rounds in the past.
Specifically Annan would attempt a four-pronged linkage approach to the new round of
Another significant factor in the negotiations was the ability of the UNSG to unilaterally
impose conditions in any of the areas of the eventual agreement in the event of the two
sides to find a path forward. This was unique in that it prevented either party from
The European Union (EU) began membership negotiations with the Republic of Cyprus
in 1990. This fact was viewed negatively by the Turkish-Cypriot leadership led by
40
longtime President Rauf Denktash, because it once again reinforced their perception of
asymmetry in balance of power and the always ascendant status of the Greek-Cypriot
The decision of the European Union in 2002 to drop conditionally as a requirement for
constraints and act upon its own interests in the negotiations” (Schiff 406). “The EU
created a sense of crisis of impending sanctions that were directed at a single party –
Turkey and the Turkish-Cypriots – while Greek Cypriots were under strictly verbal
pressure that was unaccompanied by any explicit theme” (Schiff 406). The EU lacked any
meaningful ability to act as a “peacemaker with power” and was largely relegated to the
Turkish-Cypriots
The position of the Turkish-Cypriots had changed from the earlier rounds of
the TRNC.
1. Change in internal political dynamics/Mass & elite support for peace - Rauf
Denktash’s political position was threatened due to rising economic and political
discord within the TRNC. The decades of international isolation imposed on the
TRNC had led to a decline in living standards amongst the Turkish-Cypriot
population caused inflation and a high emigration rate and there was growing
resentment to the influx of settlers from Anatolia and the continuing meddling in
the affairs of the TRNC by the Turkish state (see table below).
41
2. The “win-set” of the TRNC changed between the rounds of negotiations after the
Turkish invasion to the beginning of the negotiations on the Annan plan because
“the prospect of imminent EU citizenship seemed to represent a better prospect
for their future than continuing on with the existing state of affairs” (Schiff 396).
3. Support of Elites - Parliamentary elections in Dec, 2003 brought to power in the
TRNC the opposition bloc, led by Mehmet Ali Talat. The new government
declared it would “work to achieve a unification agreement, which would
ultimately be decided in a referendum (Schiff 397).
4. Changing attitude of external ally/actor (Turkey) – the guarantors, protectors
and subsidizers of the TRNC, had changed with the advent of the AKP
government (discussed below)
The Turkish-Cypriot side appeared motivated by the fact an agreement held “greater
benefits… than they would achieve by abrogating negotiations” and returning to the
Per capita income in the north and south of Cyprus, 2004 (US$1,000s) 2
Nominal World Bank Atlas PPP Corrected
North 8.1 7.2 14.8
South 19.4 17.6 22.3
Ratio (north/south 42 41 66
as a percentage)
Source: World Bank (2006)
Turkey
Turkey’s desire to see a settlement achieved in Cyprus was motivated by its own desires
to join the European Union and by the fact that the new AKP government, elected in
November 2002, saw its own political fortunes as linked to European Union
membership, which it knew was highly unlikely in the event a divided Cyprus was
42
During negotiation over the Annan plan – through all of its iterations, Turkey’s Prime
Minister Erdogan “made it quite clear he would not be tolerating a rejectionist policy on
the part of Denktash (Asmussen 7). Denktash was now boxed in – were he to choose to
defy Turkey he would have to resign in which case Mehmet Ali Talat would take over as
President.
Greek-Cypriots
Contrasting starkly to the changes in the position of the TRNC and Turkey the Greek-
Cypriot side felt its position was assured by its guaranteed admission to the European
knowing its membership was a fait accompli the Greek-Cypriot side came under
“considerable pressure from the US, UN, the EU and Greece” to reach a settlement
There also did not exist within the Republic of Cyprus the same groundswell of either
mass or grassroots support for negotiations and settlement which existed in the TRNC –
which can be attributed to the fact that the populace of the Republic of Cyprus had seen
itself as ascendant for a number of years and their assured admission to the European
Union was the ultimate guarantee of that ascendancy. The Greek-Cypriot side felt “it
could not be worse off than in the case of an agreement which failed to protect its
43
The bargaining position of the Greek-Cypriot side was not motivated by the same
combination of external and internal factors that have been shown to be present in the
TRNC and Turkey. There existed no convergence of interests within the Republic of
The Final Annan plan was a complex and lengthy document with five appendices and
nine annexes covering matters ranging from federal government, constitutional law and
federal laws, property rights, reconciliation commissions and the “coming into being” of
a new state of affairs. For the sake of expediency the focus here will be on the
Republic” (UCR).
The Annan plan was a model of consociational power sharing. It allowed a minority veto
governance and allowed for substantial group autonomy (Sisk 57). It defined structures
and institutions which would allow for the sequenced return of refugees, guaranteeing
that for 19 years the ethnic balance of power in the different sections of Cyprus would
not be impacted. It ensured adequate compensation for those who lost land and/or
housing and also ensured that the process would not result in expulsions of either side
44
The Defeat of the Annan Plan
referendum in April 2004. It was approved by a majority of 64.9% on the Turkish Cypriot
side but was defeated resoundingly on the Greek Cypriot side by a majority of 75.8%.
The plan suffered from a number of defects in the eyes of both sides but was supported
on the Turkish side by a majority of the political establishment and by the consensus of
Turkish Cypriots that the plan represented the best deal they were going to get.
The Greek Cypriot side had a different perspective and different realities. A majority of
the political establishment (the elites) of the Republic of Cyprus, led by Papadopulous,
urged a “No” vote. This judgment was based on the perception amongst the Greek
Cypriot population that they had already given up enough (they had, after all, lost over
1/3 of their island to Turkish military occupation for almost 20 years at the time of the
vote) and that the agreement in no way represented their ascendant position as a
statement that he “did not receive a State… to deliver a ‘Community’” (Michael 180).
(Sisk 46). The entry of Cyprus to the EU, the change in the political scene of the TRNC
and outside pressure were all seen as a prime motivating factor for all sides which
45
would induce the “ripe moment” necessary to bring the conflict to a conclusion. Sadly
this did not take into account the fact that for the Greek Cypriot side there did not exist
of every other side – from Turkey, from the EU, from the Turkish Cypriots, Greece, the
UN and the United States. But the Greek Cypriot side, due to its advantaged bargaining
position and guaranteed entry to the EU, never had that moment of convergence critical
peace was reached on the island or not robbed the EU of the ability to induce a
condition for Cypriot accession it should have “undertaken the process of socializing the
Cypriot political elite to realize the post-nation character of the Union” (Kaymak and
Vural 88). In this the EU failed entirely, with most of its initial focus on convincing the
Fact Point 2
46
Peacemaking efforts continue in Cyprus today and are motivated by the fact that a pro-
compromise Greek President, Demetris Christofias, was elected in 2008. With the
ascendance of Mehmet Ali Talat to the presidency of the TRNC in 2005 there could be a
convergence of expectations on both sides that was lacking during the negotiation
process leading up to the defeat of the Annan plan in 2004. In particular the issue of a
lack of support from the elite and masses in The Republic of Cyprus may be impacted by
the fact that the head of their state is in support of peacemaking efforts.
Without an agreement soon, before new presidential election in the TRNC in April 2010,
the prospects for peace look grim in Cyprus. The political situation in the TRNC doesn’t
look positive for the re-election of pro-Annan agreement president Talat. There exists
today a dangerous situation on Cyprus where both sides have become increasingly
Especially alarming is the fact that it is “the youngest segments of both communities
that would vote “no” in the largest numbers in any referendum on the UN-mediated
settlement plan: (ICG 7). The failure of the global community to live up to its promises in
regards to the TRNC – the promise of aid and additional recognition if they passed the
Annan plan, has been blocked in many cases by the intransigence of the Republic of
Cyprus. This has led to a lessening of support from within both the elites and larger
public in the TRNC and jeopardized the future passage of any peace plan in the north of
the island.
47
Peacebuilding in Cyprus
Varosha
Greek-Cypriot
Famagusta
In the wake of the failure of the Annan plan there exists a chance to work towards
peacebuilding efforts in the hopes of creating institutions spanning both sides of the
island. The Annan plan was far more heavily supported in the enclaved Famagusta area
of the Republic of Cyprus than in any other district (see map above). This seems to be
because “individuals in this district would have been strongly and directly affected by
the Annan Plan, given that within three months they would have regained the capital
city of their district, and the whole region would have been upgraded economically,
48
Negotiators could look to the results of the 2004 referendum on a district by district
basis and seek to apply a set of the institutions on a local level in the Famagusta district
as well as an equally-populated, adjacent portion of the TRNC which had supported the
agreement as well. This experiment could act as a “test tube” to implement, under strict
district/city government and the return of Varosha, or part of Varosha to the control of
those who fled the area in 1974, which could then operate under joint-administration as
a condition of its return. These CBMs could demonstrate (hopefully) the effectiveness
and relevance to daily life of the Annan plan and contribute to acceptance of the plan on
both sides.
The residents of the Famagusta district saw tangible benefits from the passage of the
Annan plan and accordingly they supported it in larger numbers than anywhere else.
This same situation applied in the TRNC as well. The key then is to convince the rest of
the elites and the masses of the Greek Cypriot side of the tangible benefits from a new
peace agreement. Only by doing so will any new agreement receive approval on both
The United Nations peacekeeping force in Cyprus has been in place since 1964 and
tasked with the maintenance of its current functions since 1974. It currently consists of
49
every six months by the UNSC and currently is budgeted for $54.41 million on a yearly
basis – of that amount 1/3 is paid by Cyprus and $6 million by Greece (UNFICYP).
force at the level UNFICYP maintains. The presence of the troops is no longer required
to maintain peace but are acting to enforce the situation of partition on the island which
risks becoming permanent the longer the Greek-Cypriot public feels it is not in its
interest to approve a solution to the Cyprus problem. The force can be reduced in a
gradual manner in order to not upset the security situation but which may act as a
50
Peacebuilding on Cyprus - Introduction
The case of the Cyprus conflict differs radically from many other “conflicts” which are analyzed
using post-conflict analysis because, unlike conflicts in states such as Sri Lanka and El Salvador,
the conflict in Cyprus is a frozen conflict which has devolved into a situation where two
populations, Greek and Turkish Cypriot, live in separate states – one recognized internationally,
the other a pariah state with no international recognition other than that of its patron – Turkey.
The two states are almost completely mono-ethnic and their existence represent the end result
of the use of population exchanges as a method of halting, if not ending, conflict based on
religion or ethnicity.
When analyzing the Cyprus conflict’s peacebuilding phase we are therefore left with a situation
which defies the neat analysis applied to other conflicts. Today a situation like the one is Cyprus
exists nowhere in the world (excepting perhaps Abkhazia and South Ossetia). The Cyprus conflict
is not an active, on-going conflict involving hostilities, it is not a conflict ended by the military
victory of one side or by a peace treaty acceptable to both sides. Because the conflict has lasted
so long (since 1963 and in its most modern iteration, since the Turkish invasion of 1974) it has
become not only a frozen conflict but one which is also stale5 – lacking in new ideas, energy and
initiatives engendered to bring about a permanent solution to the problems underlying the
situation. Analyzing the conflict, therefore, proves difficult within the context of contemporary
peacebuilding models such as those used by the World Bank, the United Nations or other
multilateral institutions.
5
The delineation of “stale” vs. “frozen” will be elaborated on in greater detail later in the report.
51
This report will identify and analyze horizontal inequalities and vertical dilemmas present in the
Cyprus conflict. Following the identification and analysis portions suggestions will then be
offered for remediation of horizontal inequalities as well as vertical dilemmas. In keeping with
the restricted nature of the analysis the report will try and focus on the human security and
international political economy dimensions of the Cyprus conflict and in particular focus on the
issue of property rights and ownership on both sides of the divided island. This report will focus,
in particular, on the European Court of Human Rights’ recent decision on property rights within
Cyprus and explore the ability of the decision to act as a “warming agent” on the conflict –
leading to the settlement of long outstanding issues which have kept the conflict frozen for
had only experienced, at that point, a little longer than one decade of independence. But much
like the partition and frozen conflict that were to follow the independence of Cyprus was also
The period after the 1960 independence declaration was supposed to usher in an era of
consocialistic governance and peace between the two constituent communities on Cyprus.
Instead, because the Turkish Cypriot community exercised their minority veto so consistently
the Cypriot government made a conscious choice to remove minority protections in the
52
This decision acted to lock into place the horizontal inequalities which pre-existed
Horizontal Inequalities in Post-Conflict Resolution” were present in both pre and post
independence Cyprus – including the areas of participation in government and the army and
police, the issue of land holdings and income disparity, the use of resources and both private
and public unemployment. Turkish Cypriots were underrepresented in all of these spheres and
in some weren’t represented at all – namely participation in the government, especially after
Text Box 1
Horizontal inequalities are more likely to lead to conflict when:
• They’re durable.
• They widen over time.
• Boundaries between groups are “relatively impermeable.”
• When groups are cohesive enough for collective action to emerge.
• When leaders are not coopted into the ruling system and are instead marginalized.
• When the government is irresponsive or violently repressive.
Source: Stewart 4.
The invasion of Turkey acted to separate the two sides of the islands in a partition enforced by
UN peacekeeping forces with one side of the island recognized as the legal ‘Republic of Cyprus’
and the other seen as a pseudo-state, a blank spot on the island of Cyprus occupied by Turkish
forces and completely cut off from the legally-recognized Republic of Cyprus (Theophanous 55).
Horizontal inequalities which were present on Cyprus were then magnified by the situation –
with one side availing itself of its legal recognition to develop a modern, European welfare state
while the other, unable to gain access to the same resources as their neighbor to the south,
relied heavily on Turkey for support and also on a number of shady enterprises such as
53
gambling, off-shore banking and more overtly illegal activities like the use of northern Cyprus as
a transshipment point for human trafficking and drug and gun-running (Cyprus).
The TRNC is often referred to as a “sleepy” state which due to an ECHR ruling in 1994 which
forbade exports from the unrecognized state, was forced to find other means of income. Yet this
synopsis is incorrect – the Turkish community in Cyprus has long been alienated, even before
the invasion of Cyprus by Turkey in 1974. As Bryant and Hatay established, the most recent
iteration is but a continuation of the long-term horizontal inequalities between the two states
(6).
disparities between Greek and Turkish Cypriots, speaks to the importance of these issues in
contributing to and prolonging the conflict between the two sides of the island. A recent poll
conducted in Cyprus amongst both communities indicated that 58% of Greek Cypriots and 67%
of Turkish Cypriots agreed that social and economic inequalities have contributed to the
creation and perpetuation of the conflict (Hadjipavlou 26). The higher percentage of Turkish
Cypriots agreeing indicated the less privileged position of the Turkish Cypriot community before
the conflict began – as well as the continuation of that status after the Turkish invasion in 1974.
The cessation of hostilities between two or more parties is supposed to be marked by peace
54
• Initiation of reconciliation and societal integration
• Startup of economic recovery.
Table 1
Action Turkish/Greek Cypriot End Result
Implementation?
Cessation of hostilities and Yes, Ceasefire signed Ceasefire remains in place
violence today. No active hostilities
since 1975
Signing of peace agreement No, attempted but failed Frozen conflict
Inception of demobilization, No No demobilization, no
disarmament and disarmament and no
reintegration reintegration between either
side in Cyprus.
Return of refugees No – exchange of refugees Both sides are now nearly
monoethnic states.
Establishment of the Yes – separately. Both sides Horizontal inequalities (HI)
foundations of a functioning developed separate states, based around economic
state locking in the inequalities assets, incomes and
which existed before the 1974 employment and social
Turkish invasion aspects strengthened.
Initiation of reconciliation and No, some small private efforts The two sides remain
societal integration but no official efforts. separated by a great distance.
Startup of economic recovery In Greek Cyprus – Yes. In HIs remain strong between
Turkish Cyprus – No. the two sides.
In the Cyprus conflict these seven peace milestones never fully developed and only three were
partly implemented between the two sides (Greek and Turkish Cypriots). A peace agreement
wasn’t signed – a cease-fire agreement was. Refugees weren’t returned – they were exchanged
between the two sides of the islands – creating monoethnic states on each side of the Green
Line and additional massive displacement of both Greek and Turkish Cypriots. And each state
began to set up its own administrative and statebuilding tools on each side of the island –
55
Because of the pseudo-state status of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) reliable
statistics on its economic performance are difficult to come by. Nonetheless data does exist
which shows wide variances between the two sides of the divided island in GDP growth, public
vs. private sector employment and unemployment rates (Theophanous 28). The skewed
economic situation in Cyprus has preserved and exacerbated the horizontal inequalities present
before and after independence and the Turkish invasion in 1974. While the Republic of Cyprus is
well integrated into the European and global economies the TRNC remains locked out of both
Much of what is seen on Cyprus today is also seen in other core-periphery conflicts within the
European theater – specifically the conflict in the north of Ireland which was solved with the
Good Friday Peace Agreement of 1998 (Zink 583). While the Republic of Cyprus through its
international recognition and membership in the European Union has been drawn into the core
of Europe its northern part – the TRNC, remains (along with Turkey) on the periphery. The old
horizontal inequalities pre-dating the Turkish invasion remain. Actors in the conflict on both
sides of the island have interests which are threatened by the possibility of peace and many
Thus the question must be – how can these horizontal inequalities be remediated within the
context of peacebuilding based on a European perspective and utilizing the resources of the
main actor in the region: the European Union? It is a fact that the European Union’s body of law
6
Much has been made of the TRNC’s high growth rates during the early part of the decade, which
averaged 10% per year compared to the Greek Cypriot state, which was closer to 2.6%. The TRNC’s
figures are misleading because they were mostly the product of a building boom predicated on illegal
expropriation of Greek Cypriot properties in the north. Much like the rest of the world the TRNC is now
experiencing a deep recession brought on by a bust in property values.
56
and regulations which all members must adapt, the acquis communautaire, is applicable to all of
Cyprus but has been suspended in the TRNC (Nathan Associates 9). From the point of view of
the ease of application of law the European theater must be the one which takes precedence in
the amelioration of the conflict in Cyprus (Mavrommatis 14). A recent decision by the European
Court of Human Rights (ECHR) on property rights within the TRNC will be focused on in this
paper as a valuable tool towards the resolution of the issue of property rights on both sides of
the island – this is one of the most key issues in attempting to bring about a settlement between
the two sides and one where both sides, as of now, have the widest divergence in expectations
of what a peace agreement can and will achieve. The issue of landownership, in particular the
ambiguous status of property rights in the TRNC is also one of the greatest horizontal
inequalities present in Cyprus. Perceptions regarding property rights immediately after the
defeat of the Annan plan in 2004 and continuing through today are critical in deciding how to
Table 2
Perceptions in April 2004 Scope for perceptions to evolve
The table above is provided to show the perceptions and scope for perceptions to evolve around
57
The matrix below, created by the United States State Department, provides a useful tool for
focusing more intently on the issue of property rights as a symptom and means of remediating
horizontal inequalities.
Table 3
Initial Response Transformation Fostering Sustainability
Utilizing this matrix the report will next focus on the European Court of Human Rights decision
in March 2010 which will be used as a major focus for remediation of horizontal inequalities
Demopoulos vs. Turkey Application nos. 46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/0, 13466/03, 10200/04,
14163/04. 19993/04 and 21819/04, European Court of Human Rights, April 2010 decided the
58
matter of a number of property claims by Greek Cypriots. I intend to examine this ruling in detail
and use its legal reasoning and the structures it put in place as a base from which to examine
and compel settlement of outstanding land claims in Cyprus – the outstanding status of which
has contributed to horizontal inequalities and the lack of human security on the island.
At issue in the case was the matter of the status of properties left behind by Greek Cypriot
refugees who had fled the north of the island in advance of invading forces from Turkey in 1974.
Members of the Greek Cypriot community had brought the case forward in hopes of being
awarded compensation from the court – whose decisions cannot be appealed and which are
binding on its members, which include 47 states (including Turkey and Cyprus) which are
All of the applicants in this case were claimants of immovable property in the TRNC. All brought
forward their claims because they felt the domestic remedies provided by the TRNC did not
provide an effective remedy for their claims. Their specific claims were offered under Article 8 of
the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms which states the
following:
The court, after walking through the particulars of the case and referencing past judgments,
59
The following is a broad overview of the court’s ruling and focuses on key issues germane to the
• The court found that the claimants had failed to avail themselves of a suitable domestic
remedy for their claims – which is the Immovable Property Commission (IPC).
The IPC is a body established by an act of the TRNC parliament. It is composed of 7 members,
two of which are required to be non-citizens or residents of either the TRNC, the Republic of
Cyprus, Greece, Britain or Turkey. It has the power to order compensation and as of November,
2009 had awarded over 47 million Euros in compensation and adjudicated 361, 493 square
meters of property (ECHR 9).
What marked this decision as so momentous in the issue of the mitigation of horizontal
inequalities relating to property in Cyprus is that for the first time in the history of the court
hearing cases on the subject it ruled that an effective legal remedy now existed and that the
claimants should avail themselves of that remedy before coming to the ECHR for remedy. The
• “The Court cannot emphasize enough that it is not a court of first instance.”
• “In the present applications, some thirty-five years have elapsed since the
applicants lost possession of property in northern Cyprus in 1974. Generations
have passed. The local population has not remained static.”
• “Accepting the functional reality of remedies is not tantamount to holding that
Turkey wields internationally-recognized sovereignty over Cyprus…”
• “The Court considers that there is an effective remedy for their [the claimants]
provided under the auspices of the respondent government. The court finds
that the [IPC] provides an accessible and effective framework of redress in
respect of complaints about interference with the property owned by Greek
Cypriots.”
• “For these reasons the Court decides unanimously to join the applications; and
declares by a majority the applications inadmissible.”
60
By ruling that the TRNC had established a suitable and in the court’s estimation, impartial
method of adjudicating property claims in the TRNC the court had firmly set barriers around an
issue which previously had appeared open-ended and whose insolvability had plagued the
Cyprus issue from 1974 onwards. As shown from polling data the issue of horizontal inequalities,
including property, has been shown to be of strong concern to both communities. The Greek-
Cypriot community in particular has indicated that it out of a list of 11 possible challenges to
peace in Cyprus the 3rd most indicated answer is “poverty of the Turkish community
Key Finding
The decision of the ECHR should therefore be cast as a major part of the solution to the issue of
poverty in the north by finally solving the outstanding issues of property claims (proper
ownership of land and immovable property being a necessary perquisite for any capital-based
economy) and removing a barrier to growth in the north as well as forcing the full financial
responsibility for payment of property claims in the north directly onto the TRNC and Turkey.
It is not only Greek Cypriots who are impacted by the ambiguous state of property in the north.
Turkish Cypriots are also well aware of the difficulties the ambiguous situation of the TRNC
represents:
Annan Planı'nın Kıbrıs sorununa çözüm getirmesi beklenirken, arazi parçaları gibi
gayrımenkul mülkler ile diğer gayrımenkul mülk konuları daha da karmaşık ve
içinden çıkılması hayli zor bir hale gelmiştir. Bu sebepten ötürü, Kıbrıs'taki
sorunlar adada yaşayan vatandaşlar için de oldukça karmaşık bir görünüm
kazanmıştır.
Also because of the Annan Plan failed, which was supposed to resolve the
Cyprus issue, the real estate properties such as a parcel of land, and the other
real estate property issues get complicated and obscured in Cyprus. The reasons
for this are the problems in Cyprus, which are too complicated actually for the
citizens (translated from Turkish by report author) (Tefik 142).
61
The issue of property therefore now has the potential to be transformed within the minds of
both communities, moving from one which was previously static to one which is now dynamic,
from one which was previously viewed as a possible costly hindrance on the south and whose
solution could act as a catalyst for solving the overall problem of the division of Cyprus, only one
Key Finding
For the north the decision can act to resolve the ambiguities over property which have plagued
domestic and international ownership for so long. The frozen dynamics of Cyprus, which
includes a lack of support from elites on both sides of the island for a comprehensive
settlement, could be warmed by the utilization of the decision to provide movement forward in
negotiations.
While originally caught off-guard by the ECHR decision the government of the Republic of
Cyprus seems have settled on an position of urging its citizens to ignore the ruling and asking
“The government does not favour seeking recourse to the so-called commission,
especially now during the negotiations,” government spokesman Stefanos
Stefanou said. “The property issue will not be solved in the courts; it will be
solved on the negotiating table.”
62
Stefanou said the ECHR decision did not take away any of the political and legal
arguments supporting the Greek Cypriot positions concerning the property issue
that were submitted in the negotiations (Cyprus Mail).
Yet the government of the Republic of Cyprus failed to mention that the IPC in the TRNC is not
open-ended. The commission has expiration date – November 2011. While the government’s
position is that its citizens should not avail themselves of the remedies the IPC offered, it has not
(nor could it – legally) prevented its citizens from doing so. The statement also represents the
continued manipulation of the desire of refugees to return to their homes. This occurs from
within the political elites on both sides of the island and is itself a refusal to accept the reality of
framework documents and high-level agreements since 1977, which all state that the return of
As the Department of State essential tasks matrix shows the issue of property rights can be
transformed through establishing procedures, laws, codes and processes designed to establish
the principles of egalitarianism and justice in dealing with the issue. The IPC commission meets
these standards and thus fulfills this role in alleviating horizontal inequalities in Cyprus related
to property claims. The issue, therefore, is moved from the sphere of the political (dealing with
claims through the negotiation and bargaining process – as in the Annan plan) to that of the
judicial (ameliorating the issue through the use of the IPC). Polling data has long shown that the
issue of cost in reintegrating the poorer north is an issue with a large amount of importance to
voters in the south. If the government of the Republic of Cyprus is truly serious about
reunification the vehicle the IPC provides would enable it to move down that path with next-to-
7
Furthermore the manipulation of the expectations of refugees has been a powerful tool used by elites on
both sides of the island to win elections. We see this in other frozen conflicts as well – Palestine and
Western Sahara are two prime examples.
63
The final portion of the matrix is designed to create long-term objectives to achieve
sustainability in post-conflict situations like that of Cyprus (United Nations 3). The
recommendation in this report on the utilization of the IPC is designed with the short and
medium-term interests of the situation in Cyprus in mind. Longer-term the requirements of the
situation will include a more permanent and cohesive set of initiatives to strengthen the rule of
law within the TNRC and align its legal system with that of the south and the European Union.
To accomplish this it is then recommended that the TRNC begin the process of adopting the
European Union’s acquis communautaire (Melakopidis 191). When Cyprus was admitted to the
European Union the acquis communautaire was suspended in the north. By beginning the
process of adopting the acquis communautaire the TRNC will show it is serious about its future
as a European Union member and signal to the south that the destiny of the two states is
beginning to converge. The TRNC should also work to make sure the EU-Turkey Customs Union
is implemented fully. The Customs Union has been held up by the refusal of Turkey to open its
ports and airspace to Greek Cypriot ships and aircraft. The TRNC can act as a mediator in this
dispute and signal its willingness to compromise by privately urging Turkey to follow through on
While horizontal inequalities have and continued to exist there also exist vertical dilemmas
successfully. As the defeat of the Annan plan showed us – without the support of elites the
masses will not follow. Completely lacking in the 2004 referendum was a comprehensive
64
strategy for dealing with this issue – particularly within the Greek-Cypriot community where an
almost entirely united front (excepting the trade unions and a few civic society-based actors)
opposed the Annan plan with devastating consequences for the agreement. Actors in the TRNC
were more varied in their responses but as the recent election of an anti-agreement president in
the TRNC shows us the previously amenable position of Turkish Cypriots is in danger of changing
In order to address the issue of vertical dilemmas in Cyprus it is recommended that two-track
diplomacy be utilized in order to involve all elements of society in the process of conflict
transformation (Sisk 245). Negotiations in Cyprus have traditionally followed the “top down”
The top-down approach as illustrated above has been destructive to attempts to bring both
sides of the island together. In particular UNFICYP, the United Nations peacekeeping force on
Cyprus, has acted as a guarantor of separation between the two communities (Fisher 261) when
65
in reality UNFICYP is probably the best-placed actor on the island to work to achieve the
mitigation of vertical dilemmas because it is perceived as a neutral party and it already has a
long record of working with elites on both sides of the island. The top-down approach has also
enabled elites who may have an interest in perpetuating the frozen state of negotiations on the
island.
The role of UNFICYP should be modified. The UN Security Council (UNSC), when next renewing
the mission of UNFICYP, should change its mandate from one of peacekeeping to one of
peacebuilding. UNFICYP already peripherally carries out peacebuilding activities in the Cyprus by
bringing together both sides on issues relating to the dividing line – these meetings usually take
place in Nicosia in the Ledra Palace Hotel. By broadening and strengthening its mandate the
UNSC can act to utilize UNFICYP as a warming agent on the frozen conflict in Cyprus. After nearly
40 years on the island the United Nations should re-think the “peacekeeping in perpetuity”
approach and move forward on the utilization of its mission to build and strengthen the mission
of peace in Cyprus.
66
Source: Hemmer, Garb, Philips and Graham.
The image above is used to illustrate the role UNFICYP could play in negotiations between the
two sides in Cyprus. By acting as a track two diplomacy organization UNFICYP could fulfill the
role of warming agent in the frozen conflict. Possible other actors in this role could include the
European Union or the Non-Aligned Movement. But because UNFICYP is viewed as a neutral
agent by both sides it would be the ideal candidate for this role.
Peacebuilding Conclusion
If Cyprus at one point “lay at a crossroads,” those crossroads would have been reached
in 2004 when the Annan plan laid out a future of federalism and unification or a future
of partition. Cyprus today has moved from the crossroads of a choice of unification
under a federalist approach to a growing acceptance of partition and separate status for
both sides of the island – with the Greek Cypriots enjoying the fruits of international
67
recognition and EU membership while the Turkish side continues to struggle under an
Current peace talks benefit from the fact that both sides now are represented by elites
who support negotiation. This could translate into greater appeal to the larger portion
of both Greek and Turkish Cypriots, in particular the Greek-Cypriot side – which saw a
combination of elite and mass opposition to the agreement in the last referendum. This
may be the last chance for peace for many years to come and it requires an intense
dedication on both parts to sell the idea of peace and not partition, with real and
This report has recommended two courses of action on Cyprus in order to “unfreeze” or “warm”
the frozen conflict. In addition Cyprus is characterized as not just a frozen conflict but one which
“stale,” stale being the opposite of ripeness as articulated in the second part of this report.
“Staleness” means that the conflict requires aggressive new approaches in order to inject energy
into negotiations as well as the penumbra surrounding negotiations – the “aura” of citizen and
civic society activity which surrounds any negotiation process. Staleness coupled with
frozenness is an extremely dangerous combination because it means not only are negotiations
endless negotiations but that no new activity is taking place around and from within the society
involving the negotiating parties. Examples of this include the Greek Cypriot refusal to accept
the IPC as a solution to their long-held demand for justice on property rights or the previous
68
refusal of the Turkish Cypriots to engage in good-faith negotiations with the European Union
unless they were treated as a state on equal footing with the south side of Cyprus.
By proposing the utilization of the IPC to mitigate the impact of long-term horizontal inequalities
this report is recommending action, specifically the amelioration of the issue of property rights,
which were a large factor in the defeat of the Annan plan in 2004. By acting on the issue of
frozen dynamics in negotiations and utilizing UNFICYP to ameliorate the role of vertical
dilemmas this report is proposing to create momentum forward with new agents and a “bottom
Ameliorating and reversing the corrosive effects of staleness in frozen conflicts is difficult.
Positions have hardened and generations have become locked into their view of the “other.”
But peacebuilding requires risk and it demands initiative and creativity on the part of all parties.
By seeking to unfreeze and ripen the conflict in order to push it more aggressively towards
settlement the recommendations within this report are acting within the best traditions of
innovative and original thinking. Beginning with a campaign to convince Greek Cypriots to utilize
the IPC and continuing with creating a multi-track approach to diplomacy using United Nations
personnel already on the ground in Cyprus this report and its recommendations are moving
Utilizing the recommendations of Frances Stewart, which include political and/or economic
conflict situations, while at the same time avoiding the earlier mistakes of post-independence
Cyprus, which saw the consocialistic arrangement become a source of conflict vs. a solution to
69
it, this report is designed to encourage a remediative approach to the horizontal inequalities
through economic, specifically property rights, which have long plagued Cyprus.
70
Report Conclusion
It has been said many times that a certain event presents “the last best chance” for peace on
Cyprus. In 2004 this was said about the Annan plan. It was said about the election of a pro-
settlement leader on both sides of the island as well. Certainly the actors can present either an
enormous opportunity for peace or an incredible obstacle. But as has been demonstrated actors
do not always make the difference – in the case of Cyprus the lack of popular will for
reunification, at least in the south and now growing in the north, presents as big or bigger of a
challenge to solving the issue of partition and creating a lasting and sustainable peace.
This report has offered a plethora of recommendations for moving around the obstacles of
entrenched elite opinion in hopes of creating a groundswell of popular support, which has been
particularly lacking in the south, for reunification. The report’s focus has been in particular on
the issue of remediating the horizontal inequalities which plagued Cyprus long before its
independence but which have grown increasingly vast since the Turkish invasion in 1974. As has
been shown in the north of Ireland with the Good Friday Accord – ancient enmities fed by
horizontal inequalities as well as vertical dilemmas do not have to remain as permanent features
of any society. A ripe moment can come about due to internal or external pressure or a
combination of both. In the case of Cyprus there has long been an enormous amount of external
pressure for a settlement but what has often been overlooked has been the creation of mass
support for reunification and perhaps more importantly – the creation of a positive and
71
It is hoped the recommendations offered here will spur this movement. That the case for
dynamics of the island and in appealing to a broad cross-section of both sides of the island who
72
Appendix
73
February 2008 – New Greek Cypriot president, Demetris Christofias, elected who is
not associated with ethnic nationalism or the “No” campaign on the Annan
referendum.
March 2008 – Christofias and Talat meet and agree to new round of UN talks.
April 2008 – New crossing point in Nicosia opened.
May 2008 – Parameters agreed upon by two presidents – federation of two
“constituent states” and “a single international personality.”
July 2008 – Agreement reached on “single sovereignty and citizenship – a total of 22
technical agreements signed.
September 2008 – Negotiations continue
74
Biblography
Anastasiou, Harry. The Broken Olive Branch: Nationalism, Ethnic Conflict and the Quest
for Peace in Cyprus. 1st ed. Vol. 1. Syracuse: Syracuse UP, NY. Print.
"The Annan Plan - The Text of the Plan." THE ANNAN PLAN FOR CYPRUS. United Nations,
6 Apr. 2004. Web. 1 Mar. 2010. <http://www.hri.org/docs/annan/>.
Application Nos 46113/99. Grand Chamber - The European Court of Human Rights. 14
Mar. 2010. Print.
Asmussen, Jan. Cyprus after the Failure of the Annan-plan. Rep. no. 11. Flensburg:
European Centre for Minority Issues, 2004. Print.
Bryant, Rebecca, and Mete Hatay. Suing for Sovereignty: Property, Territory and the
EU's Cyprus Problem. Rep. Istanbul: Istanbul Kultur University, 2010. Print. Global
Political Trends Center.
Cyprus: Reunification or Partition. Rep. Europe Report 201 ed. Brussels: International
Crisis Group, 2009. Print.
"Cyprus." CIA World Factbook. Central Intelligence Agency, 26 Apr. 2010. Web. 1 May
2010. <https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/>.
Collier, Paul, V.L Elliott, Havard Hegre, Anke Hoeffler, Marta Reynal-Querol, and Nicholas
Sambanis. Breaking the Conflict Trap. Rep. Vol. 26121. Washington, DC: World Bank and
Oxford UP, 2003. Print.
Fisher, Ronald J. "The Potential for Peacebuilding: Forging a Bridge from Peacekeeping
to Peacebuilding." Peace and Change 18.3 (1993): 247-66. Web. 1 May 2010.
Fisher, Ronald J. "Cyprus - The Failure of Mediation and the Escalation of an Identity-
Based Conflict to an Adversarial Impasse." Journal of Peace Research 38.3 (2001): 307-
26. Print.
Global. World Bank. Breaking the Conflict Trap : Civil War and Development Policy. By
Paul Collier, V. L. Elliott, Harvard Hegre, Anke Hoeffler, Marta Reynal-Querol, and
Nicholas Sambanis. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2003. Print.
75
Georgiadu, Stavroula. "Mainstreaming and Knowledge Management of Conflict
Prevention and Peacebuilding in Cyprus." Gender in Cyprus. United Nations
Development Program. Web
Hadjipavlou, Maria. Root Cause of Conflict, Challenges at the Micro Level and Implication
in Post Conflict Cyprus. Department of Social and Political Sciences - University of
Cyprus, Oct. 2002. Web. 15 Apr. 2010.
Hemmer, Bruce, Paula Garb, Marlett Phillips, and John L. Graham. "Putting the "Up" in
Bottom-up Peacebuilding: Broadening the Concept of Peace Negotiations." International
Negotiation (2006): 129-62. Web. 1 May 2010.
Jarstad, Anna. "Power Sharing for Peace and Democracy?!" From War to Democracy:
Dilemmas of Peacebuilding. Proc. of International Studies Association, San Diego. 1st ed.
Cambridge UP, 2008. Print.
Kaymack, Erol, and Yucel Vural. "Intra-communal Dynamics: European Union Discourses
among Turkish-Cypriot Political Actors before and after the Failed Referenda." Cyprus a
Conflict at the Crossroads. Manchester: Manchester UP, 2009. 84-101. Print.
Large, Judith, and Timothy D. Sisk. Democracy, Conflict and Human Security: Pursuing
Peace in the 21st Century. Rep. Stockholm: Institute for Democracy and Electoral
Assistance (IDEA), 2006. Print.
Mavrou, Eleni, Rasit Perev, and Michael Moller. "Cyprus: "A Cold Peace"" Interview by
David Berruti. Rivista 4 Feb. 2008: 21-35. Print.
76
Melakopides, Costas. "Euro-Mediterranean Peacebuilding: The Exit from the Cypriot-
Turkish Labryinth." 177-200. Web. 25 Apr. 2010.
Michael, Michalis S. Resolving the Cyprus Conflict: Negotiating History. New York:
Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. Print.
Papadakis, Yiannis. Echoes From The Dead Zone: Across the Cyprus Divide. New York: I.B.
Tauris and Co Ltd, 2006. Print.
Psyllides, George. "Stay Away from the IPC." CyprusMail, 29 Apr. 2010. Web. 1 May
2010.
Reunifying Cyprus: The Best Chance yet. Rep. no. 194. Brussels: International Crisis
Group, 2008. Print.
Sisk, Timothy D. International Mediation in Civil Wars: Bargaining with Bullets. London:
Routledge, 2009. Print.
Souter, David. "A Review of the Cyprus Problem." Third World Quarterly 6.3 (1984): 657-
74. Print.
Strand, Arne. "The Smaller Issues Complicating the Larger Picture." The Cyprus Review
21 (2009): 187-92. Print.
TEFÄ°K, ELÄ°Z I. DYNAMICS OF SOCIAL CITIZENSHIP AND IDENTITY PERCEPTIONS:
IMMIGRANT TURKS FROM BULGARIA IN NORTHERN CYPRUS. Thesis. Middle East
Technical University, 2007. Print.
77
Turk, Marco. "Rethinking the Cyprus Problem: Are Frame-breaking Chnages Still Possible
Through Application of Intractable Conflict Intervention Approaches to This "Hurting
Stalemate?"" Loyola LA Int'l and Comp Review 29.101 (2007): 101-39. Web.
"UNFICYP Facts and Figures." UNFICYP United Nations Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus.
United Nations, Department of Peacekeeping Operations. Web. 2 Mar. 2010.
<http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/missions/unficyp/>.
United Nations. United Nations Environment Program (UNEP). Division of Early Warning
and Assessment (DEWA). Understanding Environment, Conflict and Cooperation.
Nairobi: United Nations Environment Program, 2004. Print.
Webb, Keith, and A.J.R Groom. Settlements in Unended Conflicts: The Case of Cyprus.
Rep. Print.
Weisman, Alan. The World Without Us. New York: Thomas Dunne, 2007. Print.
Yilmaz, Muzaffer E. "The Psychological Roots of the Cyprus Problem - Path to Solution."
Diss. American University, 1998. Print.
78