ev. 2002 D1: REQUEST FOR REAPPOINTMENT/NON-REAPPOINTMENT/DISMISSAL Committee A Review Not Required (Request for reappointment or non-reappointment must be submitted to the Associate Dean by the following deadiines:) Deaeliies tora restlar a faculty member inthe: Dates fist year of service senverytan” Feb | es second year of sence irene third year or eucreeding years March 1st Section I: Background Information Name: Garrido-Nag, Karen Date of Request: February 25, 2010 Department: HSLS Schoo: GSPP Date of initial appointment to regular status: 8/28/08 Section I: Type of Request and Effective Dato(s) — (Check 66) = trun eae) X | Reappointment effective date from: Wiesio to: Safi Non-reappointment | effective date: Dismissal effective date: Section Ill; Department Chair's Certification (Attach DRE) ‘ The procedures and criteria stipulated in the University Facully Guidelines have been followed in formulating this request; Form D-RE is attached, Deparment chai My 7icy H (hie [dae FERRO iy y-22-0 Section IV: Administrative Approval for Reappointment and Non-reappointment onl, ction ly Approved _) Not Approved _| Dean: bE z patty Za i Section V: Administrative Approval for Dismissal only Approved Not Approved | Dean: Date Approved Not Approved | Provost: Date:Rev, 22802 Crete appropriate action Reappointment) Merit Increase Promotion ‘Tenure D-RE: REPORT OF EVALUATION (0 / Section I: Background Information A, Name: Karen Garrido-Nag Department: HSLS School: Gallaudet University B. Date of evaluation: February 2010 C. ‘Rank: Lecturer D, SCPI rating: N/A E. Period of time covered by the evaluation: from January 2009 to January 2010 (aoe sce last MI cr promotion) Doss faulty member being evaluated hold a joint appointment with a separate administrative unit t Gallaudet or have administrative responsibilities external to the department (2, GRI, asecond acadomie department ct=?) YES NO (Circle one) yes, write an explanation and attach ito this form.Section II: Teaching From UF Guidelines, Section 2.1.2.1 Tohing computes nce ah expert he oly amber eld andth bit timp ioadge dering fom that fi Gallond dts competent ‘sora poser best commie care sot sary andatctay he het a9 be aaah nisin, pons hoe ‘cadence and file enongh ade crt and methadone [Ec cremation ex cade ts hang eprom ae ‘tion profcency Sign Commanteaton a caine Stem 214] A. List of courses taught during evaluation period ‘Semester ‘Course # ‘Course Title ‘Credits Spring 2009: HSLS 765 - Seminar in Diagnostics in Speech-Language Pathology (2) HSLS 754 — Seminar in Phonology and Articulation (3) Fall 2009: HSLS 714 — Advanced Topic in Speech Science (3) Clinical supervision (3) Spring 2010: HSLS 754 - Seminar in Phonology and Articulation (3) B. of other teaching-related activities (e.g., dissertation committees, course development, unique features, ete.) during the evaluation period: Course Development: HSLS 754 — Seminar in Phonology and Articulation (3) HSLS 714 — Advanced Topics in Speech Science (3) SLP Curriculum Revision: served on the committee during Fall 2009 and co-chairing the committee this, spring. It has been decided that the curriculum will be revised to meet both the needs of the students and the profession. Documentation for changes are being prepared erved to grade written (Speech Science) and oral candidacy examinations Candidacy: C. Sources used in determining the rating: (check all that apply) _X_ self-report _X_ peers __X__ students ___ X__classroom observation __ X__personal observation others D. Narrative: Ms. Garrido-Nag has willingly taught the courses that she was asked to teach and has effectively executed the courses. She has also provided guest lectures in her colleagues’ courses, recently completing a two-day session on autism. She has demonstrated competence in all the information and theory that underlies her teaching content. She is demonstrating improving classroom teaching skills, and is continuing to leam, as a new faculty member, how to relate to her students and include them in her discussions. Ms. Garrido-Nag has indicated that she is eager to have an opportunity to teach in new areas, including child language and neurophysiology. Ms. Gattido-Nag’s student evaluations help identify strengths and areas of need in teaching. She had an overall average score of 69% relative to a maximum score (all ratings of “5, Highest / Best® from all students). The fourRev, 2200 strongest areas of teaching included respect for students (93%), choice of textbook (88%), availability to students (88%) and following the syllabus (78%), while the four weakest areas included teaching style encouraging participation (45%), clearly explained material (53%), overall quality of teaching (55%) and overall course design (58%). E. Rating: (circle one) Unsatisfactory Commendable OutstandingSection III: Scholarship/Creative Activity/Research From UF Guidelines, Section 2.12.2; Competence hi area mars tht a dpe member i exact conie 0 gro in ihr al, contre oan remain ware of drelepments ithe [Plone sch rout ond corbcton mayne aor of ra ora endo deal roar nd reer, pean at wore ergs at profesional sce, advanced sd), oration and cnstraton of gran atari oftexboks, wero, sofware cxsrom mater nds on A. List of scholarly, creative, research activities conducted during evaluation period: PUBLICATIONS: Shafer, V., Schwartz R,, Datta’H,, Garrido-Nag K,, Hestvik, A., Hisagi-M, Yu, Y, (2009), Automaticity of Second Language Speech Perception in Bilingual Children and Adults, GURT, Implicit and Explicit Conditions, Processes, and Knowledge in SLA and Bilinguals. Proceeding Manual. Garrido, K., Hisagi, M. & Shafer, V. (in preparation), ERP Indeces of Speech Processing in Bilinguals. Garrido-Nag & Shafer, V. (in preparation). The Effects of Attention on the Mismatch Response in Infants using Tones CONFERENCE PRESENTATIONS Presented a talk at Annual Conference of ASHA entitled Attention and Speech Processing in Infants, ‘New Orleans (2009) Presented a talk at the Georgetown University Table (Implicit and Explicit Conditions, Processes, and Knowledge in SLA and Bilinguals) entitled Brain Bases of Speech Discrimination in Monolinguals & Bilinguals: Developmental Perspectives, Washington, DC (2009) B. Sources used in determining the rating: (check all that apply) X__selfreport —_X_peers __X_personal observation other C. Narrative: The majority of Ms. Garrido-Nag's time at Gallaudet has been spent on research and rk, She has had her dissertation proposal approved; data is collected, and she is currently fhanuscript. A short paper is being planned for publication of a pilot study Through her association with and previous work at The Graduate Center, City University of New York, I have had one publication in the Annual GURT proceedings published by Georgetown University Press (December 2009), Automaticity of Second Language Speech Perception in Bilingual Children and Adults, Currently, she is preparing a manuscript, ERP Indices of Speech Processing in Bilinguals, for possible publication with her advisor at CUNY. She has delivered several presentations at professional conferences including the Annual Convention of the American-Speech-Hearing-Language Association, and has two upcoming presentations this Spring, 2010: a poster presentation of her dissertation work at the annual Conference of Cognitive Neuroscience Society at Montreal, Canada and a panel discussion at the International Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics Association in Oslo, Norway. scholar!; writIn her two years at Gallaudet University she has set-up an electrophysiology lab, and is currently planning a follow-up study of her dissertation pending an IRB approval. This research will examine the relationship of attention, speech perception and language development in typically developing infants and children who are exposed to two languages. The relationship between neurophysiological measures and behavioral measures of speech discrimination and language development in infant and child populations will be closely examined. Another goal will be to look at eross-modal (audiovisual) processing and speech perception development in infants and children with cochlear implants. This proposed study will examine the speech perception skills of children with cochlear implant in relation to the phonological training they receive post-implantation. The brain discriminative measure, MMRs, will be used to examine discrimination of phonemes by children who receive cued speech or ASL with oral training as well as the relationship between speech perception and lexical development in infants will also be measured. D. Rating: (circle one) Unsatisfactory Satisfactory CCommendable) OutstandingSection IV: Service From UF Guidelines, Section 2.1.23) ‘The action proces at ined he clr: cempetnc x2 department and fcay meer ‘herr require eric in one form ornate, Accord 12 ‘he dia’ tr anal, conta of erie my be made hs ot md (evade odin peor fade Dee st) te aad ‘poietic commun, ronda of mab-secton core, te), th ho te noe Ib ttn acl omnes, pb relations exten, “nreaoh te commun an profesiarl organza. fc member's ali expe para repo okd wih prafetinaland intel cnr forme chal and foals, A. List of service activities engaged in during evaluation period: Academic Advising Spring 2009 (5 first year and 5 second year students) Fall 2009 (4 first year and 4 second year students) SLP Curriculum Revision Committee: Fall 2009- Current: Research Lab Committee: Spring 2010- B. Sources used in determining the rating: (check all that apply) __X_self-report peers _X personal observation ___other C. Narrative: Although Ms, Garrido-Nag is not required to perform service activities during her time in a Pre-Tenure Track position, she has served the department well in several ways. She has been helping the SLP department revise the curriculum, and served as co-chair of the committee this spring during a two-day faculty curriculum retreat. She has also volunteered to serve on a research lab committee, helping to do a needs assessment and determine policies for the research labs of the HSLS department. In addition she has served as an academic advisor to four-first year and four-second year SLP students Ne rah ge D, Rating: (circle one) Unsatisfactory (or) ~ Commendable Outstanding Section V: Professional Integrity A. Narrative: Dr. Garrido-Nag’s colleagues unanimously rate her professional integrity highly. She is a wonderful colleague, takes an active role in the department, demonstrates collegiality and a positive attitude toward the program, her work and the students. B. Rating: circle one) UnsatisfactorySection VI: Rating Summary and Calculation of Points pee — i kauipcanenmynaaa [vs @ 0 Sy oe ; Comeni 2 dive Ne rating “NA [ue 0 < Senconmacin scram a [UG eo | Wa oust ‘pe “ 5. Pla ny vs wa_|_Na Fo Zz 7 Section VII: Personnel Action Criteria Teri Tnerease = 6 Levels (6-9 pain Promotion Tenure tlt Sonne hse ares of Atleast aoa in fic tr aa of ersustion, uatiteatons nd ertera aloe ‘NoUasuttectory reg any area. ‘ec In Gulden 75 No Unsaty ring inary are ‘AnSCPL rating of Internets Pas or bere. ‘in SCPL ing lnrmedte Pas 7 Bt. requlenents(Guleies 3) Section VIII: Summary/Recommendations Teaching: The following areas of need were identified by Ms. Garrido-Nag: Observe and learn from other faculty members in the department to improve teaching skills. Continue collaborating with the clinical staff to improve crossover between theory and practice. Increase teaching load in a tenure track position in Fall 2011 ‘The identification of these areas of need demonstrate Ms. Garrido-Nag’s awareness of her limitations and sincere ‘motivation to excel as a faculty member at Gallaudet. It will be important for the chair to ensure that Ms. Garrido- Nag is provided with support in improvement of her teaching in the form of mentorship from both the Chair and the upcoming SLP Program Director, Dr. Seal. Scholarship: Ms, Garrido Nag established the following goals for the next year: Obtain an IRB approval for a planned project and submit a grant to the GRI to collect pilot. Apply for a faculty development grant to be able to continue presenting at different conferences. It has been noted by her colleagues that her research is of great importance not only to the general research community but to the Gallaudet in particular. She is interested in including stucents in her research laboratory work as it gets under way next year when her dissertation has been defended. Service: During the limited time that Dr. Garrido-Nag has been able to serve the department, it has been noted that she is a kind and collegial communicator, is open to suggestions, willing to offer her own suggestions, and demonstrates andownership of the responsibilities that she accepts. Her colleagues believe that Dr. Garrido-Nag will be an effective participant in University and national committees as well as department committees as she moves into a tenure track position. Section IX: Recommendations Based on this evaluation and the criteria for personnel actions summarized above, the following action is recommended: (Check where appropriate) _X__Reappointment Non-reappointment Tenure Dismissal ____ Merit Increase: Number Points Earned: Promotion to Rank: Withee tbh pate 4 /21/20/O Faculty member comments (optional): Che pate_.4/ 2010 * Tees evaluation pertains 1 a depefment Chair, the Dean or other department member signated by the Dean wil prepare an sign the fon. + faculty member's signature doesnot necessarily indicate agreement with he content ofthe evaluation. Faculty Member! Notations re “Sign Communicatio: Dr. Garrido Nag is still taking ASL Classes and working to improve her ASL abilities. A list of the courses taken this year follows: ASL Classes: Fall 2009: ASL III Spring 2010: ASL IV It is recommended by Dr. Garrido-Nag that the department initiate a program to increase exposure to ASL. communication by its faculty and staff. The Chair agrees with this recommendation and will work to establish a ‘conversational ASL’ program in the Fall of 2010.