Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Q1
Do you believe that Mattel acted in socially responsible and ethical manner with regard to
the safety of its toys? Why or why not? What should or could Mattel have done differently,
if anything?
Introduction
Mattel is the largest global leader in the design, manufacture and marketing of toy and family
product. Mattel best-selling toy brands like Barbie, Hot Wheel, Matchbox, American Girl,
Radica and Tyco as well as Fisher-Price brands. Mattel has a very good reputation all over the
country. Mattel has done the biggest mistake which is manufacture in China. Mattel should be
more responsible to the stakeholders and the environment. This social responsible and ethical
manner will give Mattel the awareness towards the surrounding stakeholders and with
corporate socially responsible the company also can earn profit and at the same time they can
protect the stakeholders.
Labour issue in China. A national survey of the left-behind children in rural areas conducted
by China Womens Federation in 2013 revealed that near 61.03 million children or
adolescents in Mainland China were left at home, accounting for approximately 21.88% of
the children and adolescents in China, and 46.74% of the left-behind group had migrating
parents (Yun, 2015) Mattel also involved in labour issue because the wages that is given to
the worker is low. Local governments were required to set minimum wages according to a set
of criteria related to factors such as local economic development, employment, average
wages, consumer prices, minimum living standards, and the social insurance and housing
funds to which workers contribute (Jing, 2015).
Mattel can outsource their product but at the same time the quality and the safety of the
product must maintain. According to Berman, B., & Swani, K. (2010) said that the supply
chain in China is characterized by cost pressures and quality fade, multiple levels of
outsourcing often involving small producers, a large number of counterfeit goods, Chinese
cleverness at evading detection, and poor product safety surveillance by both the Chinese and
U.S. governments. Mattel outsource their product to other country because to minimise the
cost but at the same Mattel should check on their quality and safety too.
Next, labour issue Mattel must take responsible of their employees, the safety and health.
Labour issue is also one of the important topic because it involve in human rights. Especially
child labour Mattel should be more careful in this type of case. It might ruin the reputation
that been develop. As stated by Arat, Z. F. (2002), No matter which consequence of child
labour has been their primary concern, the critics, especially those located in the industrial
societies, tend to organize their efforts around banning child labour through trade sanctions,
import restrictions, and consumer boycotts. UNICEF opposes child labour not only for being
exploitative but also for endangering children's physical, cognitive, emotional, social, and
moral development; and proposes a more comprehensive approach to the problem.
Q2
What is the best way to ensure the safety of the childrens toy? In responding, please
consider how the following groups would answer this question: government regulators
(United State and China), consumer advocates, toy industry, childs product retailers and the
standard setting organisation. What might explain the differences in their point of view?
Childrens Toy Safety
1. Check the material use in the toys.
Material that use in the toys is very important because material that use might be allergy to
children especially kids that under 3 years old. Parents should take precaution before buying
toys for their children. According to (Excelligence Learning Corporation, 2008) great toys are
well constructed, shatterproof, and strong enough to hold a childs weight, and safe for the
ages of the children in the group. Dont be hesitant to carefully examine and pull on the item
at the store or when you first receive it to ensure its safe for the children. Concerns for lead
toxicity and childrens exposure to environmental toxins have resurfaced in the last decade as
increasing numbers of studies identify the serious health hazards resulting from lower
exposures to lead than previously anticipated. Although the dangers of high lead exposure
have been documented for centuries, only in the last 30 years have we identified the impact
of low-level lead exposures on the neurobehavioral development of children, with
consequences extending beyond the exposure period (Sanders, 2013).
U.S Government
The CPSC routinely test, recalls, and sets standards for toys, and undertakes media and
educational campaigns to educate consumers. The toy safety Act of 1984 indicates America's
high concern for the safety of children's product according to (Steorts, 1999)
China Government
The CPSC also said China will increase inspections of consumer products destined for the
U.S. and assist the agency in tracing hazardous products to the manufacturer, distributor and
exporter in China.
"If there is a product recall by a U.S. company that sourced the goods from a Chinese
supplier, under the new agreement, China will now let the CPSC know if that supplier also
sells its products to other U.S. importers," said Eric Autor, international trade counsel for the
National Retail Federation, who attended the summit.
Chinese officials also said China would now require U.S. importers to obtain "export
registration" for products that cause concern.
China will also ask importers to provide product designs to Chinese suppliers that are in
compliance with U.S. safety standards and that U.S. importers provide reasonable prices to
manufacturers to prevent Chinese producers from cutting corners and using cheaper unsafe
materials (Kavilanz, 2007)
Toy Industry
Toy safety has long been a priority for the U.S. toy industry, going back to the 1930s. This
concern was formalized by the first comprehensive industry safety standard, drafted in 1971
and published by the National Bureau of Standards (now the National Institute of Standards
and Technology) in 1976 as PS 72-76. In the early 1980s, a thorough review of the standard
was conducted under the auspices of ASTM by the newly formed Subcommittee F15.22 on
Toy Safety. The final product, which incorporated published U.S. Consumer Product Safety
Commission (CPSC) generic safety requirements and technical and labelling requirements for
additional product categories, was published as ASTM F 963. Since then, the standard has
been revised eight times, based on incident data and product innovations. It expands upon the
federal standards for toys. Under the 1981 Consumer Product Safety Act, the federal
government is to support the development of voluntary standards whenever those standards
will be effective in addressing a risk of injury according to ( ASTM, 2003).
Q3
What do you think is the best way for society to protect children from harmful toys?
Specifically, what are the appropriate roles for various stakeholders in the process?
The best interests of the child is a legal test used to decide what would best protect your
childs physical, psychological, and emotional safety, security and well-being. To determine
what is in the childs best interests when making parenting arrangements, you must consider
factors including the childs emotional health and well-being, the childs views, unless it
would be inappropriate to consider them, the childs relationships with parents, guardians,
and other important people, the history of care and the impact of any family violence (Justice
BC, 2015)