GUY OAKES

Max Weber and the problem

culture of scientific objectivity

Lasks concept formation

"By a subject ascribes a meaning related to values, defining
Rickert Cultural Studies him undoubtedly as a cultural phenomenon."

Determine developed by Max Weber epistemological positions, nearly three generations after the publication of his
first methodological writings, still discussion about the goals and methods of the social sciences. It is his work that
keeps the terminology for this field of scientific discourse, the problems and describes the boundary lines shall
determine.

The problem of social scientific objectivity is the central question in WEBER methodology par excellence. WEBER
understand this problem as a question of the relationship between concept formation and experience , the context
of knowledge on the one hand and reality on the other side. How can we of the objects of our perception of form
concepts and identify as valid in view of the infinite variety in which we learn both human action and its products?
It is therefore to the conditions to which the constitution of objects of social scientific knowledge is subject.

A somewhat different version is WEBER this problem also in the question of the tension between knowledge and
interests , concept formation and values . Judging from the consideration that social science concepts that are
based on assumptions, which in turn are anchored in certain values and therefore as subjectively must be
understood, so the question arises how it should be possible, using such terms social phenomena adequately
form of cognitive capture. What are the reasons for the view so you can carry into the field, that subjective values
form the basis for the conceptual framework within which social phenomena are objects of scientific knowledge?

In all discussions of methodological issues of Cultural Studies MAX WEBER "objectivity" attachment has long been
already the rank of a classic - and so as a discussion of the WEBER outlined in this paper, basic problem is to
serve as an introduction to the core questions of the present study.

WEBER dresses the problem of his essays in the question, in what sense one can speak in the field of cultural
studies of "objective truths" at all. Addressing this question in all its conditions and implications, this is the
methodological guiding principle underlying s work. The following assumptions determine the course of
argumentation: the idea of the irrationality of reality, the idea of cultural studies as a science of reality, the value
relationship doctrine - and finally the problem of objectivity with which under the provisions of this conditions every
culture science sees inevitably confronted.

1 The irrationality of reality

In his methodological considerations underlying conception of the irrationality of reality manifests for WEBER a
certain idea of the relationship between theory and empirical research, concept and reality, thinking and being to
each other. This idea is based on the assumption that reality can not be attributed to any conceptual system.
For this h i a t u s i r r a t i o n a l i s between concept and reality WEBER cites two reasons:

First of all reality is concretely and individually , by its uniqueness and uniqueness determined, so that everything
we consider directly for really, due to this being real can only ever be concretely and individually. Terms, however,
even the so-called "individual concepts", which refer to unique, are necessarily abstract . Consequently, it is only
logical if one assumes that each conceptual description of reality abstracted from the diversity of its specific
characteristics. Because concepts are abstractions, they can not reflect the individuality of the real in its
concretion.

Second, it WEBER, in terms of the reality of an epistemological assumption, which was a commonplace for large
parts of the German academic philosophy of the late 19th century. This assumption according to reality as we
experience an infinite extensive as in intensive respects diversity. Extensive quantitative infinite or is the reality,
insofar as one can not provide an exhaustive description of the whole. Intensive or high-infinite it is, insofar as it is
equally impossible to describe one single aspect of reality comprehensively. Since every detail of reality can have
an unlimited number of qualitative characteristics, there is no satisfactory criterion by which one can decide when
a description is considered sufficient. Accordingly, neither the whole of reality nor any of its components can be
fully understood.

2 The science of reality and the constitution of cultural

From the above presented epistemological presuppositions WEBER draws its conclusions with respect to the
fundamental methodological differences between natural and cultural sciences. He emphasized that these
differences do not arise from the substantial character of the respective object. Follow, for example, not of a
fundamental ontological dichotomy between body and spirit , will see freedom and determinism, personality and
nature . On the contrary, the key methodological differences between the natural and cultural sciences based
solely on their different knowledge objectives.

The scientific knowledge e strives to bring the real into a comprehensive framework of nomological statements, a
system generally he generic terms and laws to create plays which universal and absolute validity. Because they
are on law statements and thus to a complete reduction of qualitative to refer to the Quantitative, science is
nothing on the peculiarities of reality as such. Extent, the quality is always concrete and never an unconditioned,
it can not be a possible object of nomological knowledge, which is only interested in the general and
unconditional. The natural sciences to solve the problem of h i a t u s i r r a t i o n a l i s So the fact that they
of the particularity of reality - to speak with WEBER - "abstract". This abstraction procedure corresponds a
nomological conception of Nature: The reality is nature, insofar as they can be brought under general laws
necessarily valid. Accordingly, an object falls if and only within the scope of the natural sciences, if our interest in
knowledge depends on its general features, which can be detected with nomological means. Needless to
say, is a cognitive interest, which aims at qualitative uniqueness and individuality of an object, not compatible with
the abstracting traversed methodology that goes along with the nomological natural version.

However, since the cultural sciences are r e a l s c i e n c e s , the knowledge of which is the real target in his
individual and qualitative characteristics, WEBER not believe that the nomological methodology traversed a
feasible way of Sciences to write of human culture. From the thus-understood form of cultural studies cognitive
interest due the characteristic of cultural studies problematic relationship to the irrationality of reality. While the
natural sciences to the specific custom because of their indifference to any difficulties to deal with the
epistemological assumption of the irrationality of reality, that cultural studies see the question asked how
individual aspects of reality can be identified as such under those conditions. Because of the infinite variety of
reality, the cultural studies research interests focus on the specific characteristics of objects we just consider as
essential, important and significant because of their individuality. Therefore, results from WEBER doctrine of the
irrationality of reality the following problem: With regard to the criterion that the objects can be defined , which we
are much more important and significant?

The goal of knowledge of cultural studies is a limited part of reality he: culture. For this reason, the question of the
criterion above can be generalized to the effect that principle defines the realm of cultural objects. What is meant
here is the problem of the constitution of culture in general or, shorter, the constitutional problem that implies the
question: What is a cultural phenomenon and a cultural fact, and how to define such facts?

The solution to the constitution problem is a condition of the possibility of cultural studies knowledge. Because
any kind of cultural research requires a principle by which the object of study can be identified as a cultural
phenomenon, therefore a criterion that those descriptions that the object define instructs. Among other reasons
WEBER called the solution of the problem, a constitution "transcendental presupposition" of cultural studies. Here,
the problem Constitution must not be confused with the epistemological question of the formal criteria to be met
by the scientific explanation schemes. As long as a solution to the constitutional problem is missing is some
information about what's declaration prone to an object, not possible. So, what does WEBER solution of the
constitution problem?

Third value relationship

WEBER for the solution of the constitution problem is a process which he calls "value relation". Accordingly aims
culture scientific knowledge on objects from which, so far as they are certain values in relationship, plays a
certain significance. By an object to a related values important attributes, ie it defines him undoubtedly as a
cultural phenomenon. WEBER believes that how any cultural scientific interest in knowledge of the importance of
his Output assumes that you can attach to a phenomenon because of their value relatedness. The specified with
a value reference significance is it that can be a cultural studies date from a little. The solution to the problem is
based constitution so that certain descriptions of a phenomenon by means of their value-related significance
identified . For one thing thereby alone the cultural phenomenon that can be described as significant in this
sense.

A basic requirement of criticism of the WEBER positivism is the thesis that the constitutional problem a solution
can not be brought closer with the assumption of statistical or law-like regularities, because cultural
significance can not be derived from nomologischem knowledge. In objectivity saufsatz WEBER underlines that a
committed relationship value through cultural meaningfulness does not coincide with any nomological regularities.
From the fact that certain correlations occur with statistically specifiable regularity or even necessity, by no means
follows their membership in the cultural sphere. On the contrary, according to Weber, there is a negative
correlation between the abstractness of a property or the general frequency relationship on the one hand and the
possibility of something to refer to a value on the other side. In ROSCHER * essay, there are the Reasons that
leads the field for this incongruity WEBER. First of all, the cultural significance in his eyes is dependent on the real,
concrete. Values can be related only to specific individual entities. The reference object of a law but is always an
abstract concept. There is a direct relationship between the degree of generality of a concept of law and the
distance of the speakers concept to reality: The more general the law, the more abstract and reality also be the
reference object. For this reason nomological universality and cultural significance are negatively correlated with
each other: The more general the law, the less it has to do with cultural significance. This is one reason why the
identification of cultural significance can not take place without preconditions. The cultural significance of a
phenomenon can not be derived from a system of laws concepts, no matter how extensive it may be.

In h i s t o r y a n d s c i e n c e DIAPER BAND believes that one can attribute values only those phenomena that
are unique in their individuality and unique. In diaper bands eyes this thesis is based ultimately on the
individualistic concept of value, the Christian theology in its confrontation with the axiological universalism of
Greek philosophy has led to the field. The Christian idea that only individuals values can be attributed is closely
related with a view, be in what Creation, the Fall, and the life of Christ understood as unique events, which is an
unprecedented significance. In this performance the first time is the expression of what DIAPER BAND called the
inalienable metaphysical law of history: the interest of reality, insofar as it is unique and unrepeatable.

This individualistic concept of value according void our historical interest in a subject, if we note that this is merely
a case among many, so we can not help showing no emotional affection. . According frightening the thought of
the possibility of a doppelganger or the eternal return of all things DIAPER BAND According to these
considerations prove all the individuality of values: The Attribution of values always requires a singular-specific
speakers. In this basic philosophical anthropology facts that we attribute values exclusively individuals, the source
of our interest lies in individual phenomena.
Science can this form of theoretical interest not satisfy, because it proceeds nomothetic and apart from the unique
and high specific characteristics of the real, to discover the laws that govern phenomena. Individual unit only in
the field of view of natural science, in contrast to the History does not have an intrinsic interest in the individual
characteristics of reality has, if it is an average guy, a case, therefore, can be subsumed under a general law. It is
precisely the goal of knowledge of science par excellence, a system possible abstract and general laws produce,
and for this reason is the nomothetic knowledge a triumph of abstract thinking over the perception of concrete
reality shows.

In contrast, the science of history has an idiographic there is interest, ie goal of knowledge is to understand the
specific characteristics of the unique events themselves. The story takes an event not therefore have an interest,
because it has something in common with other events, but because of his own, very specific qualities. In
contrast to the scientist, the historian seeks a form of knowledge that is concrete and singular features of the real
needs. The theoretical ideal, which arises our interest in the individual, can thus be perceived only by history.

The basic problem raised by NAPPY BAND in the final passages of his Strasbourg Rektoratsrede h i s t o r y a n d
s c i e n c e , is also the focus of Rickert l i m i t s o f s c i e n t i f i c c o n c e p t f o r m a t i o n :

Custom-historical events can not be explained by general laws. There is no system of nomological statements as
accurate and complete Anyway, from which one can derive any description of an individual event. For this reason,
our directed at individual phenomena cognitive interest can not be satisfied by the means of science
Nomothetisches and ideographic research interests are independent of each other and are suddenly next to each
other. "Law and the event remain as the last, incommensurable . sizes of our conception of the world co-exist "

LITERATURE - Guy Oakes, The limits of cultural studies concept formation, Frankfurt / Main, 1990

GUY OAKES
Emil Lasks analysis of concept formation
and the irrationality of reality

Max Weber's objectivity "Lask According lies in the sheer facticity of reality at the same
Rickert Cultural Studies time his highest and sole law, which of course will mean that
the real subject no law."

Although the recognition of individual symptoms is the object of history, these phenomena are themselves but
incomprehensible. Among the numerous writings neukantianisch he Provenance that investigate issues
associated with this problem, offers EMIL LASKs brilliant inaugural dissertation on Fichte's philosophy of history
without a doubt the most careful and comprehensive representation. The representatives of the West German
School According leads to realization only by way of concept formation., the transcendental conditions for the
recognition of an object are thus the conditions that must be met for this article may be brought to term.
Something is on the scientific object of knowledge, if we subsume it either general terms or if we form a concept
that represents it in its particularity. Therefore only concept formation promises knowledge, and the possibility of
historical knowledge gets so consistently to the problem of individualizing process of concept formation, ie, the
question of the conditions, which according to the concrete reality can be placed in their respective specialty
adequate to the concept. This epistemological premises illustrate why LASK wants to solve the problem of
historical knowledge just by a concept formation lesson. He argues that all theories of scientific concept
formation can be divided into two categories, which denotes an analytically as embodied for example in the work
of Kant's , the other as emanatistisch how she came to flower in HEGEL Philosophy.

The basic assumptions of the analytical logic can be summarized as follows:

(1) conceptualization is always an analytic abstraction from concrete reality;

(2) why are terms of content less nutritious than the real itself, only as illustrative, but can not be determined as a
concept;

(3) we have therefore to do it with a dualism of concept and reality;

(4) because the concrete reality is not accessible as such for the concept formation, it is i r r a t i o n a l .

The analytical logic says that any form of concept formation emanating from the concrete objects of immediate
experience, which alone reality belongs Admittedly, the concrete real - so to speak. itself - not enter directly in
terms. Concepts in turn are created by researchers abstractions that are so far generally, as they give
expression, resulting in a plurality of phenomena sharing with friends. Only in this sense detects the concept
formation the immediately given . The concrete in its uniqueness and inscrutability thus marks the limits of
concept formation. In this Kantian framework organize concepts of reality, ie, the resulting objects are examples
of the application of the concepts themselves. Consequently, the relationship between concept and object is
purely logically he nature, it is not a "real" relationship. because a term an artificially created intellectual structure
is, ie an abstraction, the reality is always more substantial. By continuing logical abstraction arise always
inhaltsleerere terms. Though the concrete reality may fall under concepts, but because they must be abstract and
less substantial, they can not even absorb the reality in itself. The concrete reality itself is just i r r a t i o n a l , it is
not a possible object of knowledge, because they can not be "understood".

The emanationist logic , however, has these basic assumptions back in full. For them, a concept is not an
abstraction from reality, on the contrary, the concrete emanates from the concept and realized you could also say
that embodies its content. The concrete can be derived from concepts, which is a higher, richer form of reality; it
thus falls "under" terms, and the content of those terms encloses the contents of the concrete. The purely logical
relationship between concept and concrete reality, which claims the analytical concept formation theory, gets into
the perspective of emanatistischen logic to the virtually ontological relationship, which is further presented as a
dialectical relationship, in the form of a w o r l d p r o c e s s . Logic is here "while metaphysics and ontology".
Terms are completely real, the concrete, the emanates from them is perfectly reasonable, which is why both the
dualism of concept and concrete reality and their irrationality must be considered as canceled. As can be the
content of the concrete reality entirely derived from terms, is what is really reasonable, and what is rational is real.

Although LASK recognizes that the emanationist logic is quite coherent in itself, but he can not do it, to share the
central premise of this theory, namely HEGEL doctrine of the concept, according to which the terms are more real
than the concrete reality. Like RICKERT and DIAPER BAND LASK considered terms as artificial mental structures
that abstract from the concrete reality. This means that the West German school, provided they to solve the
problem of historical knowledge to be able to go back to Kant, must follow the premises of an analytical logic.

But this is the representatives of this philosophy dealing with two not inconsiderable consequence problems - the
dualism of concept and reality, and the irrationality of custom concrete - that a conceptualization of the specific
custom seem to prevent from the outset. Following closely SPRUCE LASK argues that the contingent and
heterogeneous character of the individual for a h i a t u s i r r a t i o n a l i s was responsible between thinking and
being. Just because the reality can not be deduced from general concepts necessary, there is this unbridgeable
gap which must be also seen as irrational because the concrete could not completely rise in individual terms.
Therefore, it must actually real, as DIAPER BAND noticed already at the end of h i s t o r y a n d s c i e n c e ,
simply be accepted as incomprehensible b r u t e f a c t . According LASK lies in the sheer facticity of reality at the
same time his highest and sole law, which will of course mean that the real no laws s u b j e c t . Though the
concrete can be brought under laws, so it can not be deduced from them yet. It may follow the laws, but does not
follow f r o m them. Due to the anomic nature of reality are law and fact or concept and reality "incommensurable
values".

So how can you mindful of the h i a t u s i r r a t i o n a l i s , establish the possibility of historical knowledge, is it a
promising solution strategy is not really essential to close the alleged LASK gap between concept and reality? In
this case, would the reality on the one way or another emanate from concepts, as otherwise it would be possible
to detect an individual entity concept? Even if such a procedure would be logically possible, which denies LASK
course, it could not serve as a solution to the problem of historical knowledge. Because it would contradict the
basic axiological assumptions on which rests the knowledge of individual entities. In his discussion of this
question LASK points to a connection point, between the h i a t u s i r r a t i o n a l i s and an understanding of
values is, therefore, values of individuals can only be attributed LASK calls this c o n c e p t : . .
W e r t i n d i v i d u a l i t t If all concrete phenomena nothing more than mere applications of general terms, so
how any would lose interest in a particular individual's basis, since under these conditions, the LASK occupied by
the term W e r t u n i v e r s a l i s m u s , not concrete phenomena, but only in general terms, or laws could attribute
values, under which they fall.

The Wertuniversalismus excludes the thesis of the Wertindividualitt and therefore cut the interest in the historical
basis. As we have seen, is the thesis of the Wertindividualitt, which is intrinsically intertwined with the interests of
the individual, the h i a t u s i r r a t i o n a l i s ahead. For this reason, the problem of historical knowledge LASKs
analysis can not be solved, that the h i a t u s i r r a t i o n a l i s overcomes and the gap between concept and
reality closes, therefore the path to becoming, have taken the Hegel and the followers of Emanatismus. However,
implies that historical knowledge despite - perhaps because of - the h i a t u s i r r a t i o n a l i s is possible. This is
exactly the way the RICKERT is gone, in whose philosophy the h i a t u s associated with the irrationality of reality
i r r a t i o n a l i s not overcome obstacle is on the way to historical knowledge, but whose transcendental
presupposition.

LITERATURE - Guy Oakes, The limits of cultural studies concept formation, Frankfurt / Main, 1990

GUY OAKES
Heinrich Rickert's logic
a historical cultural studies

Max Weber's objectivity

"Because the truth is a value, knowledge is not in the image of
Lasks concept formation an object, but in a statement to a value."

(1) The immanence of the real

The reality we experience RICKERT According as one neither in time nor in space circumscribable infinite variety
of individual designs and operations among themselves in a immeasurable are en relationships. This is twofold
implies: reality is i n f i n i t e , inasmuch as it can be experienced never exhaustive; it i s o b v i o u s , since they
are neither i n t o t o can understand. RICKERT speaks here of the extensive diversity of reality. In addition, each
event is in its experiential extensively-infinite variety but also infinitely complex, which is not only due to the fact
that each entity is related to all other entities in countless relationships that never can be completely detected.
Even if such an individual design redeemed from all their relations, but an infinite complex remains in two ways
exist. Firstly, the number of parts into which one can decompose any event, in principle unlimited. Although

we can find out which is the "smallest" element perceptible, but we can not be sure that it is not but still are
"smaller" parts,which our attention are escaped. RICKERT calls this the quantitative infinity, adhering to each
event. This thesis of the quantitative infinity is based on the simple fact that we have no criterion by means of
which we can decide when we have the "smallest" indivisible building block in front of us. Second, one can say
that both of each process and all its parts have an infinite number of aspects. We can never become aware of
these aspects in its entirety. Each event has an indefinite number of properties, which in turn imply an indefinite
number of points - and there is no principle that a complete picture helps us all these aspects. Since each
property in turn infinitely many distinctions embraces, is an event infinitely varied and qualitatively. RICKERT
therefore speaks of the intense variety of reality.

The thesis of the extensive as intense diversity of the real aims not only to the world of physical body, but also
extends to the area of mental processes. Even the subjective-psychological reality of Icherfahrung is

infinitely complex. Due to the unlimited abundance of intrapsychic processes to me is not possible to arrive at a
complete idea of my own mental experience, ie to capture everything I ever thought, wanted, hoped, etc. have
wanted. In addition, each mental process, in itself, also infinitely varied. For example, resembles no emotion
exactly another, no volition is repeated in identical form it. Add to this that each mentally e process a temporal
process, the end of which you can dissect into countless sub-stages. Consequently, the reality is as a whole,
including the world of mental processes, irrational , inasmuch as there is no criterion by which we may find that
our knowledge they acquired in their totality; and every part of reality is irrational because there is no criterion by
which we could test whether we are dealing with a full description of all its aspects.

(2) criticism of epistemological realism

The second step on Rickert's way of solving the problem of historical knowledge consists in the rejection of
epistemological realism. RICKERT uses the concept of epistemological realism in the b o r d e r s , without it to
determine precisely. His practiced at this position criticism is quite confused. He develops his arguments only
incomplete , they often only briefly outlines the wide variety of objections and mixed with each other, you can
bring against the epistemological realism.

None the less, Rickert forth remarks that he considers the epistemological realism for a position considered
knowledge as simple reproduction of reality actually experienced. Accordingly, a statement can be a truth raise
sanspruch when is a faithful reproduction of the properties of its object . Extent that such an epistemology is
referred to a correspondence theory of truth. In the l i m i t s referred RICKERT this epistemological position as the
picture theory , because she sees the purpose of knowledge is to provide a picture of the tangible reality. The

o b j e c t o f k n o w l e d g e is concerned RICKERT detail, though not precise, with the epistemological realism,
by dealing with DAVID Hume's philosophy is concerned.

Experience encompasses HUME According to two different types of consciousness sinhalten: once the
impressions , which are caused by the symptoms, and next to it the ideas that reproduce these impressions. In
this view, knowledge is nothing other than the correspondence between ideas and impressions, ideas are true if
they accurately reflect the impressions they represent. RICKERT calls this "empirical realism" or "immanent picture
theory".

Mindful of the irrationality of reality and given the impossibility of knowing reality as a whole or in its entirety, it is
not surprising that RICKERT can not get used to the epistemological realism. Just as we experience the reality,
they can not be imaged or reproduced either in its extension still in its intension in any sense. In addition, can
Rickert's rejection of epistemological realism nor explained by two constitutive features of his theory of knowledge:
its concepts and theory of judgment. Because terms in ricker chen sense should not be confused with ideas that
he considered only for phenomena of spiritual life. terms but are structures for the purpose of gaining knowledge.
They are mapped by referring to special features in the world of physical or psychological facts and shaping it into
coherent units of meaning are constitutive of concepts. The term content that is always clearly defined, is
something quite different from the content of an idea that is changeable and uncertain. During an idea embodies a
diffuse variety of perceptions, a term is clearly defined by a set of statements or judgments.

Already in his dissertation O n t h e D o c t r i n e o f t h e d e f i n i t i o n unfolds RICKERT rudimentary his

conception of the relationship between concepts and judgments . Each knowledge consists of judgments , any
statement which raises a claim to knowledge, is a judgment. As to its logical content, is a completely certain or
specified term, the product of a judgment. By RICKERT indicating the existing between concepts and judgments
dependency ratio and on the differentiated form of propositional terms, it aims primarily from the fact that
discursive moment of realizationwith respect to the aspect of perception emphasized. Object of a concept is not
an idea or perception , but the total of the amounts expressed in judgments of relations between ideas and
perceptions. These relationships are not perceptually, but discursively, because they consist of judgments.

In his theory of concepts differs Rickert concept formation concept of decomposition. Conceptualization refers to
the synthesis, ie the combination of elements of experience that are considered for the determination of a concept
as much . Term decomposition refers to the process of decomposition, are investigated in the terms of their

individual constituents back. Term analysis always proceeds in judgments. Despite the fact that between 1888,
the date of first publication of the t h e o r y o f d e f i n i t i o n , and 1929, when the third and final edition comes
out in European philosophy takes an analytically-linguistic turn, understands RICKERT under a judgment still
completely unperturbed one mental process that corresponds to a declarative sentence. Term decomposition, ie
the analytical determination of a term, translated the term in a sentence or in a series of judgments, where it is the
term that is judged on the. Its properties are those components of the information to be picked in the synthesis as
significant. Thus, the synthesis, in which the elements of the information are linked to the concept, and the
judgment is also a concept analysis, the decomposition of the term in its components, only the reverse of this
process.

Concept formation ie Synthesis, said the movement of thought of the judgments formed by them to term. Term
decomposition, ie analysis, means the movement of thought from the concept to the judgments, of which it
consists. RICKERT illustrates this mutual translatability of concepts and judgments on the example of the physical
gravitational term, the contents of the law of gravity, which is a judgment expressed is congruent.

The most thorough discussion, the RICKERT dedicated to the theory of judgment, are found in the third chapter of
his o b j e c t o f k n o w l e d g e . How he performs there, its uniqueness lies in a judgment that it is the only act
that plays the truth or falsehood . Judgments does not mean to make representations. Rather we have here is a
to do act of deciding what is true or false , and therefore an act of affirmation or negation. Just because ideas can
be neither true nor false, they also contain no knowledge . Therefore, all knowledge is bound to acts of judgment,
truth can never be found any ideas. Weil detecting means judgments , an affirmation or denial is always implies a
process that can not be understood as mere mapping. Even if we do not the reality as infinite variety erfhren, so
it would still be essential to reject the epistemological realism, because the act of knowing, unlike the making of
ideas, should not be understood as a mapping or reproduce.

The same conclusion reached RICKERT by - - in a different argument than the truth value designed . A cognitive
judgment is an act of decision on true and false. Because the truth is a value, knowledge is not in the image of an
object, but in a statement to a value . This argument rests on the assumption that any act of will can be
understood as an opinion for or against something. RICKERT According volitions are bound to an either / or - and
we are each forced us to choose one of two options. Although this fact may seem to the be irrelevant spawning of
ideas , but it comes to an opinion, which always implies a position-taking and can never be an act distanced
viewing, so he acquired its decisive importance.

And the object to which we judgmental comment , must always be a value, for only what is worth to us, can
erheischen our devotion. This is the sphere of values not anything in reality , but something Governing, and
values can therefore also not as something existing view: you are unreal or unreal. This in turn implies that there
can be no Korrenspondenzverhltnis between values and reality . If we consider the truth as a value, it means
that we can not say of something true that it exists, we can only say that it is. Therefore, one can of the fact that
true statements are possible, do not indicate a correspondence between knowledge and reality, just as one can
argue that true judgments reflect their items. In Rickert's eyes, the idea of such a mutual correspondence
relationship is for anything but conclusive. For him, a statement is not true because it corresponds with reality, but
because her salary, more precisely, its unreal importance for the reality has validity.

In his remarks to the difference between the meaning of a judgment on the one hand and the process of judging
the practical judgment enforcement on the other side determines RICKERT closer to what is meant by this
ideational content. The enforcement of the judgment, namely, which is always a temporary, of a specific subject
brought forth act, he wants to know strictly separated from the cognitive significance of the judgment. Here he
distinguishes between two types of sentence meaning.

On the one coming judgments to a subjective meaning which reflects the intentions of the one who practically
takes a position in the enforcement of any judgment. The subjective meaning is the act of judging immanent, it
embodies the current meaning of the judgment, but not the meaning of the judgment object. Have judgments but
also an objectively e meaning that is completely independent of the intentions of the judge and the act of opinion.
This objective meaning is the proper object of cognitive judgment, with its truth or falsity of course neither
ontological character still being conformity may be attributed. As discussed elsewhere, include the objective
judgment meanings not the reality, but the sphere of Geltens to - and to that extent they apply, they may not be
considered as an imaging-like reproduction of reality.

In summary, one can say that RICKERT provides two reasons, with which he explains his rejection of
epistemological realism. One of these reasons is based on his view of what concept formation and knowledge is,
the other on his reflections on the subject of recognition judgments. RICKERT are terms formed by judgments
according to, ie by acts of affirmation or negation. Therefore judgments, as opposed to ideas, no pictures of the
real. Knowledge would therefore even then not a mere reproduction of reality, if we do not auffaten the real as
an infinite variety. In addition, the object to which you take judging position, considered by him to be true or false,
a value is. But values as something nonexistent lie outside the sphere of reality. Consequently, there can be no
imaging shaped reproduction of the real knowledge of the subject of a judgment.

Objectivity
Method

see auch Logik , Theorie , Erkenntnis , Kausalitt , Denken , Allgemeinheit ,

Analogie , Identitt , Abstraktion , Differenz

001 Method: mode logicus

002 knowledge theory is methodology.

003 "Tell me 'how' you are looking for, and I'll tell you 'what' you are looking for." - Ludwig
Wittgenstein , Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Ffm 1980, page 67

004 It applies two types of methods to think s distinguished: problem thinking and system
thinking.

005 The range of fact n is so diverse that we an off choice , our interests must accordingly
make.

006 "All Logical e is categorical , all the problems of logic are also problems category. " -
Paul Natorp in Flat / Holzhey (eds), epistemology and logic in neo-Kantianism, Hildesheim
1980, page 230

007 "The known is any reason that it is 'known', not recognized . " - GWF Hegel in Schmidt,
Burghart (ed), materials to Ernst Bloch's 'principle of hope', Ffm 1978, page 446

008 For a full, complete description of a physical object s is never possible. No theory
'explains' a sensual quality e.

009 "Weber and Rickert understood both by methodology, the study of the logic of scientific
concept formation . " - See. Guy Oakes , The limits of cultural studies concept formation,
Ffm, 1990, page 152

010 "For the mere notion of ' fact 'add, say even the entire tissue and the complete system of
logical en categories recognize implicit. " - Ernst Cassirer in Flat / Holzhey (eds),
epistemology and logic in neo-Kantianism, Hildesheim 1980, 306

011 Each conclusion is always limited, only under conditions. Logically e relationship s just
say something about a mindset context, but nothing about the reality .

012 "Among the mechanisms of conformity science union thinking s probably the coercive
method of rank at the expense of the content in the first place. " - Emile Durkheim, Sociology
and Philosophy, Ffm 1976, page 27

013 Harmless minds see through the definition Re- lease of many scientifically he theorem
not e.

014 organization of thinking means s unit and order to bring into our world of thought.
015 The main mistake that ordinary thinking s is the equating of unequals .

016 "On the understanding of the method based of scientific e spirit, and all the results of
science could, if those methods were lost, a renewed prevalence of superstition s and the
nonsense s not prevent. " - Friedrich Nietzsche, Human, All Too Human - A Book for free
spirits, Frankfurt 1982, page 304

017 It is absurd to believe that something we perceive , as it really is.

018 "So also is the folder a creator, as he is not cataloged, but the correlations produced by
the-watched insights. " - Karl Jaspers, Psychology of World Views, Berlin / Heidelberg / New
York 1971, page 214

019 Only the theory decides what can be observed.

020 Most spirit strength problems are ultimately problems of classification .

021 It is impossible to prove anything, because that would be an infinite regress lead.

022 The science consists of law s, not facts .

023 "I have found my result, but I do not know how to find it." - Carl Friedrich Gauss,
without further source

024 "I have fought the idea of a scientific universal method and tried to show how
meaningless the doctrine according to which the common elements of things with the
essential characteristics of the concepts are the same., it had become clear to me that there is
always a certain Z weck is needed, with regard to which the essential en be divorced from the
insignificant features and that it matters in the methodology to meet the diversity of these
purposes, the diversity to understand the scientific methods and to do it justice. " - Heinrich
Rickert, The limits of scientific concept formation, Freiburg / Br. 1902 Foreword Page III

025 What can be studied is always a relationship or an infinite regress of relationships, never
a thing . 026 A

distinction is somewhat abstract it. 027 The

method must not triumph over the matter. 028 The

natural factor eludes principle each measurability . 029 The

nature is not a factor in human method. 030 The abuse of

language has long for a mystery of science counted. 031

truth has a compliance of thinking s with the things to be. 032 A

theoretically e unification is just about the abstraction to win. Each formulated problem
already contains half of their solution. 033 The simplest

thinking is thinking style related. 034 with a method we

ask system atically. 035 "from which the term word deduction clarifying initial deliberations
of the First section of the second main section of the Analytic of Concepts, or of 13 in the
output B, it is clear that the transcendental deduction of the pure concepts of the
understanding with the demonstration of, or evidence of legal basis is concerned "that the
authority" of the "use" of the pure concepts of the understanding in the knowledge of a
particular subject " clear "is (A85, B117).. Equally clear is the problem that arises hereby It is
important to explain in more sufficiently manner, by what right, ie, from which the intended
logical necessity, the pure concepts of the understanding to determine the

subject matter of the knowledge are essential, ie. every objective determination as constitutive
moments when the Konstituentien the objective validity of this provision are Kant speaks of
this in the way that he says it is the "objective reality" (A84, B117) of the pure concepts of the
understanding in question. - This transcendental-legitimation question, the question quid juris
is to ensure that the validity sfrage. It aims to geltungsbegrndende function of the pure
conceptions of the understanding. They were placed under its geltungsbegrndende role in the
determination of an object, this or that object, one which also always, and asked them what
these geltungsbegrndende, this the a priori concept relating to an object function arises. " -
Werner Flach, The problem of transcendental Deduction in Hans-Ludwig Ollig, materials for
neo-Kantian discussion, Darmstadt 1987, page 152

036 method means nothing more than problem solutions in objective to give it shape. 037

truth must contradictory slose knowledge be. 038 All

thinking is a function of I . 039 Each

question setting is from their language dependent en conditions. 040 The method is called by
the

respective application situation and acting subject considered in isolation. 041 Only the
intellectual

isolation of the procedure, in which only the general is e scheme of the procedure for
discussion makes it possible methodological principles to systematically capture. 042 Because
we have a method that must
individually en situations not be solved anew each time. 043 "be representational means to be
independent from the subject. The explanation of such independence is only possible in an
abstraction of the relation to consciousness. The abstraction is in fact always possible and
completed, but not yet characterized as rightly stated existing. The abstraction itself must be
valid. Abstraction is called negative waiving. But

abstraction for whose sake we will only understood apart from the positives. However, since
the object is now positive, the law says that subjectivity is overcome in this respect its
importance. Just because the subject the law is, it can be thought of as the relation to the
subject transcendent. At this (! False) argument, one for close Natorp critical thought of: The
object has its validity value through the objectify de work of the subject in the sciences. " - to
Wolfgang Marx, The philosophical development Paul Natorp in Hans-Ludwig Ollig,
materials Neo-Kantianism discussion, Darmstadt 1987, page 71

044 The whole thing itself remains idealistic . 045 Our

recognition can only in the distinction be clear. 046 In

understanding is freedom recognized. 047 The chaos of

detail s or the devil is in the details. 048

Unbezglichkeit en are absolute units. 049 There is no greater mistake than the belief

aims and purposes are one thing, methods and tactics en another. 050

objectivity is a matter of scientific method s. 051

Linguistically e argument s justified only linguistic findings. 052

Ideologically there thinking is justification sdenken. 053 The constant confusion of

abstraction en with the reality is one of the most egregious errors of the human mind s. 054
The

science asserts the primacy of the method before the thing . 055 In the

singular en sensation shows the spoke logically e intangibility of the immediate en. 056 "So
it's a hand again the legacy of

rationalism that we encounter here, if the a priori nature of the causal principle as a general
and necessary items for every possible experience is considered essential; and on the other
hand, Cassirer formulated this principle yet again so that it simply the methodology defined,
according to which the world from the viewpoint of general and accurate rules, from the point
here, the highest possible precision is to be detected. However, such a method is not
universally applicable; the derived - as a methodology - exclusively from the purpose , who
shall be pursued here. - It is the way Cassirer can not agree when he says that the causal
principle is not so much a prediction of future events, rather than containing a promise of
future findings. He supports this assertion by pointing out that in strictness really accurate
predictions are impossible; but in strictness no findings in the context of physics are possible.
On the contrary: It is even highly problematic, even in this context of knowledge about
talking. The greater the accuracy and precision with which seized the physics of the object,
the more it loses itself in symbolic constructions and ideal en-fixing. Not always greater
insights she wins, but a growing instrument to control nature. And this by enabling more
accurate and more extensive to forecasts. " - Kurt Hbner, Cassirer's contribution to the
philosophy of physics in Hans-Ludwig Ollig, materials for neo-Kantian discussion,
Darmstadt 1987, page 288f

057 has in the fundamental structures of the atom there is no point more idea and thing to
separate. 058 The

structure of thinking s must change if the new one will understand. 059 We can only

think what makes us the language allowed. 060 There is no for all

science en applicable universal method . 061 "In all

perception you take only your own s condition true. " - Johann Gottlieb Fichte , without
further source

062 "The affiliation of some of today's scientific directions of modern linguistic logic
mathematisierender and formalizing way they can be the salvation see in model theories, in
the figure of conceptual systems of a science with those of another, so that at the end of sheer
signification, relations , functions , pictures and models is nothing left, which is to be imaged,
which stands in a relationship, what is to be represented in a model. The genuine rationalist
does not dissolve in an empty functionalism, relationalism or model idolatry. " - Simon Moser,
law and reality, Innsbruck / Vienna 1949, page 294

063 " argument is nothing more than a subtle and highly effective method, a trusting en to
paralyze opponents. " - Paul K. Feyerabend, Against Method, Ffm 1979, pages 278

064 "Make up the fact s as we go along. " - Paul K. Feyerabend, without further source

065 Cancel the problem consequence in favor of the system consequence. 066 A process that
is not in

contradiction obeys sprinzip, is not science , but chaos. 067 It seems that the

ideal of exact natural science s in quantifying search all qualitative. 068 We can

emotions not know by analyzing learn but again only by feelings. 069 The act of

observation affects the appearance. 070 All

observation are en theory coined. 071 The

problem e a selection are having to make inescapable. 072 In the finite

world everything is in contrast to each other. For the infinity nothing can be opposites. 073 In
quantum

theory can be a possible event only in terms of a possible observer define out. Here for the
first time is the subject-object cleavage of natural science theme s point of view. 074

Plurality metholologischer locations . 075 It is the wrong method of

words n to go to things define . 076 "A

natural explorer, himself a real and life of nature is dissected for example a rabbit, this rabbit
is also a real being and was, at least barely a few hours ago, a living individuality . Having the
naturalist has dissected it, he describes it: Well, the rabbit from the description shows a rabbit
in general, that every individuality is stripped of all rabbits is similar and will therefore never
to exist the power, and will forever remain an immovable and nonexistent beings, not even
physically but an abstraction , the captured shadow of a living being . The science has to do
only with shadows. " - Mikhail Bakunin in Wolfgang Dressen, Antiauthoritarian stock and
anarchism, Berlin 1971, page 124

077 Love is in the best method. 078 The

thinking in remuneration n and thinking in causes are opposites. 079 The

generally valid knowledge has the people, the rule gives over the world. 080 The

science works with a notion of sensation s, as it would be thing s. 081 Wherever not

perceived , is ge is judging t. 082

thinking is judgment s. 083 All

thinking strives for unity and wants from the manifold a principle derived. 084 The

nature is a complicated web of relationships n that the observer always include . 085 The

science altogether builds on the distinction between random en and necessities, which is the
same between event and structure . 086 Outside of pure

logic and mathematics nothing can be proved. 087 Each

name is bondage and border . 088 order is not in a

infinite amount of en individual judgment to lose s, uses the thinkers of abstraction and thinks
all individuals in the general order. 089 The

law of causality only in terms of time and space meaning. 090

space, time and causality are only the phenomena. 091

bill is the essence of time . 092 The

difference is the essential thinking principle. 093 The

phenomenological e statement turns off all empiricism from. 094 The

infinity keitshorizont of space, time and causality . 095 "The critical analysis especially with
the Kantian epistemology and the CONTINUED because research into the foundations of the
exact sciences has be that the formal disciplines recognize

logic and mathematics their form systems not only independent of the experience , ie of all
empirical data contexts, constitute, but that it is also not the slightest evidence any formal
logical sentences as statements about the real world , of empirical science s is explored to
understand. From the thinking necessary validity formal-logical, especially logical-
mathematical theorems on their a priori validity in the empirical real world (where a more or
less hidden content interpretation of formal expressions must be given) to want to close, is
because of the absence of any relations between formal logic and contents of the statement
interpreted systems, which would justify such a conclusion, completely impossible. Any
attempt to always understand which formal logical proposition as a priori valid statement
about reality must, as untenable speculation will be rejected. " - Bla Juhos, Which
conceptual forms are the empirical description available in Ernst Topitsch (Hg), problems of
Philosophy of Science, Festschrift for Viktor Kraft, Vienna 1960, page 103

096 We are able things as they in themselves are even, regardless of how the human
conception appear not to recognize . 097 all

recognize is the same set. 098 The

activity of the vaginal s is work , force and power of the mind it. 099

multiplicity contradicts the simplicity as a principle of understanding it. 100

Difference e often only be repealed by creating new differences. 101 The

thoughts thing is the purely formal without reality. 102

unit , difference and relationship are category n that to her only in terms of opposite meaning
have and therefore can not exist without its opposite. 103 The extracting a

singular s relationship and keeping away all the other, in which the object is in fact, is
precisely the abstraction . From then on, which is confusion not far off. 104 "The ideal
isolation and division of the given, its

logical e separation in different sites is one of the most used tricks of thinking s, a real
inseparably he complex is in different ideological elements and parts disassembled and each
of these elements is then considered in its isolation. " - Hans Vaihinger , The Philosophy of As
If, Berlin 1919, page 372

105 The abstractions are a sweet poison that mental confusion in its wake. 106 "

will , "" mind "," imagination "," feeling ", etc., are mere collective name . 107 "The

reality is certainly a Heraklitischer flow of events, but our thinking would elapse itself, we
would not fiction imaginary breakpoints and border lines us that Wirklichkeitsflues, those
flowing reality usurp . " - Hans Vaihinger, The Philosophy of As If, Berlin 1919, page 411

108 differences in terminology are no differences in the matter . 109 We operate with nothing
but things

that do not exist : lines, planes, bodies, atoms, divisible times, divisible spaces . 110 The

Logical is only possible due to the basic fallacy that it's equal to e are things like cases. 111
The real enemy of the

thinker s is the slip . 112 The

color is a product of the light. 113 We maintain long-familiar impressions on new

sensation en graft. 114 Human

behavior is infinitely complex and from many sources determined. Who exclusively causality
assumes sverhltnisse, must the charges of gross simplification to put up with. 115 "to mark
and articulation of the in-resistant River and in continuous

space-time en nexus standing reality , the exact structure of the real, to avoid vague
information, we apply in the elements of reality an arbitrary choice, and draw lines and
boundaries where there are none . " - Hans Vaihinger, The Philosophy of As If, Berlin 1919,
page 470

116 not Everything remains essential unsaid, even without being asked if we with harmless
General notions to the reality approach. 117 We

see what we want and are blind for what we do not want to see. 118 All

scientifically s descriptions of facts n are highly selective . 119 layer, hierarchy, level and

class are order s and not Real phenomena. 120

Description is always generalization of individual cases n. 121 The undivided, free

individual is empirically he research inaccessible and it can not be after his term. 122

logic is only pragmatically useful and practical . With knowledge she has to do insignificant.
123 "The insight that between the formal-logical form area and the area of empirical
correlations between phenomena no content and no

validity srelationen exist, is in contrast to the majority of conventional epistemological

systems view. The by Aristotle and represented in the medieval view that the forms of thought
always also the forms of being are, is a belief that one by metaphysical and theological
theories trying to explain. remarkable feature of these experiments is the fact that these
theories have seen mostly forced, in some form of universal consciousness to accept, whose
thoughts and ways of thinking will be just the forms and laws of reality, the human-subjective
consciousnesses usually as less perfect individuations public awareness are accepted. One
would assume that with the onset of empirically-exact Research the epistemological e
condition of conformity of thinking and being encountered a critical attitude. But this is not
generally the case. There are at most single serious consequences of the mentioned condition
of bereinstimmumg of formal thought area and the reality of a critique subjected but to ask
(as in Hume's skepticism), without the general validity of this assumption into question. " -
Bla Juhos, Which conceptual forms are the empirical description available in Ernst Topitsch
(ed), Problems of the Philosophy of Science, Festschrift for Viktor Kraft, Vienna 1960, page
103f

124 In the empirically de science en can not truth , but most true translucent achieved
sensitivity. 125 A

theory that would be sufficiently comprehensive to the fact of their own existence would
involve a infinite regress lead. 126 The hypothesis of

science is a one-sided relationship with the fact nmaterial. It acts as an attack on the world.
127 It is

pointless or " pathological "to the simple and immediate experience of the meaning sdingen
doubt to login. 128 criticism of the traditional concept of

the subject as a substance . 129 The

organization of thinking s must the arbitrariness and coercion consider exemplary, through
which we the unformed nature of human concepts to impose. 130 The Juggle of

abstraction en it will not succeed the confusion overcome. 131 There are only a few ways in
which we communicate with the outside world, namely our five

senses . 132 "The tremendous success of the

abstraction s of science , the one on the page in the space and time easily localizable matter
delivered and on the other to perceive the, suffering and the thinking that, but never in the
nature happen engaging spirit , has asked the philosophy under the compulsion - Alfred North
Whitehead, Process and Reality, Cambridge 1929, page 255

133 materialism and idealism are only relevant interpretations of the world. 134 The

logic is the money of the mind it. 135 "sub-

reality and perfection I understand the same thing. " - Spinoza, without Another source

136 The alienation of infinity s and abstract - General en. 137 transition from the

abstraction in the view , the mystical e feeling . 138 "Omnis

determinatio est negatio . " (All determination is negation ) - Spinoza, without further source

139 value and non-value comes from people and is not in things . 140

value contemplation and His sbetrachtung are the two sides of the methods dualism. 141

underivability the value s from the reality . 142

Eigenwelt of subjectivity - public world of objectivity . 143 The

value relationship is the criterion by which we from the plethora of individually en fact to n
significant and insignificant differ . fortune 144 "The probability description in the field of
micro phenomena primarily uses two forms of description: the corpuscular - and the . shaft
Description Despite the use of these two conceptual systems we can microscale not of the
empirical existence (

reality ), it was of corpuscles, either, to speak of waves For to this end we are only justified if
we a. sufficient identification of the corpuscular - or wave conditions through measurements
can give In corpuscles we have about the state of motion of a particle at different points of the
trajectory through measured simultaneous position and momentum values may indicate, until
then we are entitled to speak of the empirical reality of the corpuscle.. The reality of waves
may say we only when we wave intensity (can this energy or momentum grant through the
shaft to be) at various points of the wave can be determined by measurement. Known, these
requirements are at the corpuscles and waves can not be fulfilled in the micro range. So we
are talking here in the unqualified sense of corpuscles and waves, ie, there is probably
empirical data to the corpuscular and other data that speak to the wave character of the
phenomena, but in both cases satisfy this data only to a partial, but not a sufficient labeling of
the states. - If we corpuscular and wave concepts use of the descriptions, but always have to
add the phenomena we describe are neither corpuscles nor waves, then the two conceptual
systems are nothing more than empty conceptual forms , whose terms are not clearly
empirically real objects can be assigned. Rather, the systems of the corpuscular and wave
concepts allow only represent structures that are capable of giving a partial description of the
correlations between phenomena in the micro range. Here now arises folgenen question: If the
corpuscular and wave terms only apply as formalism and the application of this conceptual
systems allows only partial, not adequately sufficient descriptions, so then we choose not to
another, possibly richer concept system that allows an adequate description, ie the phenomena
does not mark as merely improper corpuscles and waves, but a sufficient clear identification
of the phenomena allowed? - This question has Copenhagen school been a remarkable
response. Following this direction, we are compelled to use corpuscular and wave terms,
because these two conceptual systems are, if one may say so, our a priori forms of thought .
We can not help but the phenomena in the form of corpuscles or waves thinking. This
however by no means follow that the real phenomena must have really corpuscular or wave
character. There only are our thoughts no other word forms are available for the properties
and law regularities of the empirical phenomena follow therefrom but nothing. It could be, of
course, that the empirically-real Phnoeme corpuscular or wave character have, then we
would come to a clearly adequate description of the phenomena through the use of our ways
of thinking. Alone, the empirical research shows that we in the application of our available
forms of thought, just the corpuscular and wave terms, do not reach a clearly adequate
description. It concludes that the range of our thought forms not adequately be to the field of
empirical correlations between phenomena. It is here, therefore, a discrepancy between the
forms of thought and forms adopted the empirical reality and thus are the most important
requirements of the conventional wisdom regarding the relationship between thinking and
(empirical) His, or the recognition of empirical reality, abandoned. " - Bla Juhos, Which
conceptual forms are the empirical description available in Ernst Topitsch (Hg), problems of
the philosophy of science, in honor of Viktor Kraft, Vienna 1960, page 116f

145 What is not for us is is ansich .

146 The really logically e box ends where the subject-object relationship ceases. 147

reality can only guide on the time determine. 148 The

intuitive e knowledge always regarded only the single e on. 149 The

will exerts on the mind . a disturbing influence from 150 There are two fundamentally
different

behavior sweisen: the subjectively e and objectively . e On the purely objective ways we
never get into the inside of things. 151 The right

thinking depends also from the correct wool from as the want of thought. 152 One must

sensation of the perception differ. perception is part of the minds there. 153 The

familiar use of words and names creates diverse confusion . 154 "When the

recognition a Tun is so necessarily follows that the Recognized suffers . " - Plato, Theaetetus

155 problems arise because different things somehow in a pot thrown. 156 'how' something
you

look for , suppressed somehow from what you expect. 157 The

causality is based on an observed direct frmigkeit . 158 The

expectation draws attention . 159 "The

agreement of signals n always contains a public , otherwise the is agreement unnecessary. " -
Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Ffm 1980, page 67

160 "One question always corresponds to a method. " - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus
Logico-Philosophicus, Ffm 1980, page 14

161 "you can only search in one system : So there is absolutely something you can not search.
" - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Ffm 1980 Page 175

162 "An infinitely complicated law means no law . The law would then be at most: It's all in
how it is . " - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Ffm 1980, page 148

163 "The evidence proves only what it proves. But the fog he can not lift. " - Ludwig
Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Ffm 1980, page 320

164 against the truth , there is no law of the majority . 165

logic is accounting . 166 The

thinking is of the matter is limited . 167 " What size

measured is that it is. " - Albert Einstein, without further source

168 A large number of similar things in it the same to take the form of e, so that they can
access more convenient. 169 Everything is with all

the same set The. rule the number of triumphs. 170 The really

important en things of life s can not be calculated . 171

quality is far more difficult to handle than quantities., the judgment s provides a higher
activity presents itself as the counting and calculating . 172 quantities

differences are easier to believe it when quality sunterschiede. 173 A

language that the world not recognizing split we have not. 174 We take the

sum of progressive changes under a concept of purpose together. 175 The

law Sidee is an ideal he thought that never completed realize can. 176 The

order of consciousness s happening in the direction of perceiving s and want to s. 177

means and ends are thought forms to order our consciousness s. 178 The term

cause is used where only means and ends are meant. 179 The four basic types of

order our spirit eslebens: perceive , want , want and cheap . 180

net he science is only the question open, what ' is ', not the question be what' should '. 181

practice is the treatment of individual cases n. 182 The

Highest what man can achieve is objectification of his thought world. 183 The

sensual s perception creates no knowledge of a law , it does just the sort de mind . 184 The

want the interest is more the division into ends and means than the A Regulation in causal e .
Categories 185

questions are general , problem e specially . 186 "The

institution s of science require fences and name tags . " - Ralf Dahrendorf, paths from Utopia,
Munich 1974, page 45

187 The legal term e has it with the order of the will sinhalten and not with the scientifically s
knowledge of the body world to do. 188

sensations are mere scales, the change s the reality to measure . 189 From the failed attempt
by the

company s science s, the methods of nature to take sciences and imitated, is the man enwrde
great damage incurred. 190 We

think with value s and feel with them. You are our actual tools with which we the world
consider , interpret and learn . 191 The "success" of natural

science s based on a reduction of reality , the reduction of quality to quantity. 192 "All

appearance is that of subjective e reason the judgment s for objectively is held. " - Immanuel
Kant, without further source

193 All nouns testify only from the tendency to personification , not of reality . 194 All

knowledge can only analogically be. 195 The

Krumme is subject to the Straight subsumed to better so expect to be able to. 196 In the

abstraction de facto be contradictions in logic e contradictions rethought. 197 The

abstraction is a trick with which the thinking , the reality s difficulty en outwitted. 198 All

thinking runs on DC also tion. 199 set in relation ie

the same set, so the thinking calculation is possible. 200 "

thinking is a regulated mistake . " - Hans Vaihinger, The Philosophy of As If, Berlin 1919,
page 217

201 The categorical e processing of sensation s but has been a change in the experience , a
falsification of the given reality . 202 The

categories are not, as a convenient tool for keeping sensation s crowds to deal with. 203 The
essence of

rational en research it, in imagination the things smethode be disconnected from all external
influences to they completely isolated with respect to a specific purpose to consider . 204 The

Individual is uncountable . 205 The essence of things beyond the

will of s, is no researchers open. 206

incommensurability is Un measurability , A comparative availability. 207

terms are non- spatially e and non-temporal entities. 208 If everything absolutely un

distinguishable would be of all others or not the slightest resemblance would with some other,
there would be nothing to say . 210

Immaterial e goods are not subject to consumption or no wear. 211 voice criticism or

thinking criticism or knowledge criticism. 212

time is the hallmark of I , time is the hallmark of thing e. 213

space, time and causality are only human, only linguistically e demonstration and thought
forms. 214

law is temperance a myth , the man in the nature . has placed 215 For images and

metaphors can be no conclusions draw. 216 for

mental phenomena e there is no measure unit s. Mental quality s can not be implemented in
physical quantities themselves. 217

mathematics he measure only the dead e nature when the life measure itself, they have
previously all life thought away . 218 Outside of the human

mind s there is neither a count nor a fairs . 219

unit sbegriffe have only the meaning that they as a measure have for counting. 220

law e are economically e Summary en of experience s. 221 "The

system is Macherei in the substantive s home world, the world of mysticism . " - Fritz
Mauthner, Dictionary of Philosophy Vol.2, Zurich 1980, page 264

222 space, time and causality are the basic concepts of thinking .'s 223 "

completeness is the death of science . " - Ulrich von Wilamowitz-Mllensdorf, without further
source

224 The idea of linking cause and effect . 225 "The

Transcendent e is the knowledge of that of which we know nothing . " - Fritz Mauthner,
Dictionary of Philosophy Vol.2, Zurich 1980, page 480

226 The truth is elusive, because without a word . 227 We need an accurate

separation s-line drawn between the really Heartfelt s and the perceived en as the Inferred s.
228 "We have the

positivism of natural science to solve en, since all observable e and Measurable e only
representative, not elementary importance value has. Such a science is not realistic , not even
relativistic , but only symbolically . " - Viktor von Weizscker, nature and spirit, Munich 1977,
107

229 the numbers barbarism

230 "... because fact are n observation s, man-made that the nature of a particular question set.
The form and meaning of the question, however, is already a theory and facts must, since they
are silly and dumb in itself, respond, whether the theory is right or not. It is so bad about the
science, if we see that theories and facts yes go their own ways. Two opponents, the fight
about whether a theory is right or wrong , is still stand on the same ground. " - Viktor von
Weizscker, nature and spirit, Munich 1977, page 83

231 The so-called material e object and its by the consciousness accomplished recording are
purely mental construction s., the conformity of the constructed with the material object is
pure conjecture . 232 The danger lies not so much in the fact that researchers
specialize , but that experts generalize . 233 "The

Spirit namely, the experience soon tired of looking for his convenience because the area of the
General . " - Francis Bacon , New Organon of Sciences, Darmstadt 1981, p 29

234 " Once is never enough, two is always "-. sociologist wisdom 235

dialectic is made to the method irrationalism . 236 All

thinking is pressing for repeal the contradictions . 237 The Jewish principle of Ent

against tion of thoughts s against the reality . 238 If something

set is simultaneously becomes something not set and therefore excluded . 239 "The human

mind is like peculiar among things greater order and equality ahead than is really to find it;
and although in the nature many individual stands and among themselves different , he likes
seals parallels and correspondierende conditions that do not exist are. " - Francis Bacon, New
Organon of Sciences, Darmstadt 1981, p 34

240 "Who his subject not as contradictory has learned, mastered it not. " - Bernard Shaw,
Socialism and the nature of man, Ffm 1973, page 234

241 non-linearity of all live the system e. 242 'What' we

see depends on 'how' we see. 243 What is not

measured and quantified can be is not scientific and not really . 244 The electron is a
Teilchenantwort when we gave him a particle

can ask questions and a shaft in response to a wave question. 245 "I mistrust all

systematics ren and go out of their way. The will to system is a lack of righteousness . " -
Friedrich Nietzsche , Twilight of the Idols, or how to philosophize with a hammer, Ffm 1985,
page 14

246 An amoeba pipetted out on a object carrier is anything other than an amoeba in their
natural en life breakfast room . 247 How complicated as the

logical connection e, which is 'though' symbolized by the word ... 248 "Something

Unknown is something known due it, eases, soothes, satisfies , is also a feeling of power . " -
Friedrich Nietzsche, Twilight of the Idols, or how to philosophize with a hammer, Ffm 1985,
page 48

249 All is by calculating manageable , there is no secret . 250 "How do you want to do it, '
scientifically 'to choose between the value of French and German culture, I do not know. " -
Max Weber , Science as a Vocation, Berlin 1984, page 27

251 each of us lives the forced pause, after repeated occurrence of a certain event a any kind,
initially unspecified definable connection between the individual events to take. 252

Individuality is life speed that the dead concept . disobeys 253 The form of the

term s is the shape of the law to the generality and objectivity . 254 "The

thinking is thingness , or thingness is thinking. " - Georg Lukcs, The young Hegel Bd .2, Ffm
1973, page 769

255 Each symbolic e sense is world potentially problematic . 256 The

term lends objects and processes that were fluid and indistinct previously contours . 257
methodological

relative ism.

cases of their own principle . requiring 260 Something like the "

Good " does not exist . 261 "Not so because it is a

seen before , it is seen, but on the contrary, because it is seen, it is something seen, not
because it is a guided, it is done, but because it is out, there is a guided, and not because it is a
Worn it is worn, but because it is worn, it is a Born. " - Socrates in Birnbacher / Hoerster,
texts on ethics, Munich 1976, 161

262 the method of absolute isolation is only an ideal web . 263

justification it is only where someone is willing rational being. 264

knowledge is not static, but dynamic. 265

generally means time spatially unlimited . 266 discovery context - context of justification
(Pragmatic difference of explanation and prediction) 267

Feyerabend 's methodological Dadaism

268 Explicit definition are en rejected because of their completeness, they are static and can a
possible extension of a knowledge not meet sbereiches. 269
observation sdaten are not only theory- impregnated, but entirely theoretical. 270 The
meaning of the word "

sum "is uniquely defined for a single region, namely for numbers. If you want to use it in
other cases, so every time it needs a new definition , and that is simply by practically
determined e considerations, which according to present need depends sen. 271 "No one

sees the world with ease s eyes. " - Ruth Benedict without another source

272 terms have a subtle influence on the mindset . 273 Where

mind is, there is law . 274

Logically e contradiction slosigkeit a sentence is not proof of reality . 275 le terrible

simplificateur 276 "No

thinking , even the purest not may be different than using the commonly en forms of our
sensibility happen. " - Wilhelm von Humboldt , writings on language, Stuttgart 1985, page 3

277 distinction of sensual s and nonsensical . guest articles 278 "The outlines of adjacent mix
things forward slightly the imagination, as before the

eye . In time however, follow intersects the present moment a certain boundary between the
past and future between being and non-longer-there is no confusion ".. - Wilhelm von
Humboldt, writings on language, Stuttgart 1985 Page 4

279 The idea is what the objects makes capable for mass of thinking s and the perception of
being s needed. 280 "The real substance is

ideal to be processed and controlled. subjectivity and objectivity are a per se and the same and
only be different, because the reflection they each counter asked. " - Wilhelm von Humboldt,
writings on language, Stuttgart 1985, page 8

281 "Every language is the spirit certain limits , excludes, insofar as it is a certain direction,
other . out " - Wilhelm von Humboldt, writings on language, Stuttgart 1985, page 13

282 The words are the signs of the individual terms . 283 From the first element of the

language of a synthetic process it. 284 "Both the things in the outer

nature , than the internally excited activity penetrate to the people with a lot of features at the
same time a. He strives for comparison , separation and connection, and in its higher purposes
for education, more and more enclosing unit . " - Wilhelm von Humboldt, writings on
language, Stuttgart 1985, page 46
285 Each noun can be the verb stamp. 286 The

quantitative e thinking is materialism profane kinds. 287 There is no

review skriterium or measuring system , with the immeasurable in real life could be made
commensurable. 288 In numbers can agree most closely.

sizes can mathematically and thus " objectively be determined. "Once a high the numbers on
the table, then nothing can be definitely be t. 289 The analysis separates the

facts from each other and ranks them geradlinig- causally on. 290

Rational it thinking different , measured, categorized and tends to fragmentation. 291 main
aim of

science is not importance and role to understand the things, but to her master and to predict
their development. 292 The

world is completely on the number -. was the fascinating idea of the last century 293
remaining lots proofs are provided and

contradictory sfreie definition s are delivered - at all sides objectivity sanspruch and
elimination of value . propositional 294 "Thither disappear

perspective, sound, taste, touch and smell , and with them have since gone aesthetics and
moral sensibility e, value e, quality , shape; there are also feeling e, motives , intentions s, soul
, mind , spirit . The experience itself is from the realm of science , he was expelled research. "
- Ronald D. Laing in Fritjof Capra, turnaround time, Munich, 1988, page 53

295 The Cartesian method: the world to analyze parts and these parts then causal law en to
arrange. 296 analysts are basically incorrigible

mechanists and materialists s. 297 Neither the electron nor any other atomic "

object "has inner properties of its environment independently are His attributes -.
teilchenhnlich or wave-like - depend on the experimental situation from, ie . the apparatus to
which it must interact 298

forces are in measurable quantity s described: mass, velocity, energy. 299 The discovery that
mass is a form of

energy is, has a profound influence on our view of the matter had. 300 At the macroscopic
level, the notion of

substance a useful approximation to reality , at the atomic level, however, he has no sense
more. 301
ideal image of the cool, uninvolved observer s. 302 The

structure s the matter are reflections of the structure of consciousness s. 303 Modification

sensual he perception by past experience s, expectations and objectives done s not only the
interpretation, but already at the starting point, the "doors of perception". 304 health is a

subjective e experience whose quality we know intuitively but can never describe or quantify
exhaustive. 305

science is with measurement s and quantitatively associated s findings. comprehension Last

but exceeds words and idea s. 306 One method gives us no results, but

tools in the hand. 307 "Rien ne ressemble plus . la premeditation, que la logique of faits
"(Nothing is

intentional so similar to the logic of fact n.) - Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, without further source

308 The concept of " substance "puts the thought already to a certain unconscious rail fixed.
309 The German

idealism is the joy of faith see that the experienced e world really is. 310

sense-data can not be separated from the process of their description . 311

knowledge theoretical problems are not evidence , but

Insight that between the formal-

logical en form fields and the range of the phenomena of reality no content and has no validity
relations, stands in contrast to most insightful theoretical forms of s systems. thought s are
equated with "shapes" of being. Such theories feel forced in any way a " generally it "
consciousness to accept, whose thoughts and ways of thinking just the shapes and law should
be e reality, the human- subjectively en consciousnesses are usually assumed to be less perfect
individuation of the general consciousness. " - See . Bela Juhos in Viktor Kraft (Eds),
Problems of the Philosophy of Science, Vienna 1960

315 The purpose of scientifically s method is to arrive at statements that law have eskraft. 316
At a

certain point each listen measurability on. 317 , adopted the discrepancy between the

forms of thought and the "forms" of reality is the most important requirement of the
conventional wisdom regarding the relationship between thinking and being, or
recognizability and reality abandoned. 318 For our
sense organs , as well as for each instrument , there is a lower limit of responsiveness below
which nothing is recorded. What no effect upon our senses, can not we recognize are. 319 The

natural law e testify to the psycho-physical constitution of our cognitive apparatus there. 320
All

change is only connection and separation of parts. 321 Each

definition is the imaginary congruence of word and thing ahead. 322 "The

abstraction was to Jacob's ladder, on which the philosopher to certainty ascended. " -
Friedrich Albert Lange , History of Materialism Bd.1, Ffm 1974, page 59

323 The individual things are actually not at all, but are merely. The phenomena of flow
unsubstantial then. 324 Each compilation of

knowledge s to a system inhibits the farther progress . 325 "The

General is nothing but the name . " - nominalism in the Middle Ages in Friedrich Albert
Lange, History of Materialism Bd.1, Ffm 1974 , page 68

326 The tendency to the nature derive directly from the word, is the cornerstone of the
Aristotelian theory of concepts . 327 The

deception lies not in the sensation , but in the perception , in the judgment . 328

individual things are worthless sham beings. 329

Close is arithmetic and all arithmetic can be attributed to addition and subtraction. Where
nothing is added to or subtracted, hear the thinking on. 330 The

language expresses a desire for feasibility , planning and demystification of. 331 The

simplicity is a trick. 332 We solve

linguistically , what objectively can not be resolved and may not be solved is . 333

values are not properties of things. 334 The human

mind thinks everything impermanent resistant . 335 "Where to

deception and error are as beruth the on disagreement with the matter. " - Nicolai Hartmann
in Albert / Topitsch, values controversy, Darmstadt 1979 Page 26

336 The ideal of science probability 337

lens e standards are with human freedom incompatible. 338

system atisierungs ask Z weckmigkeit sfragen. 339 The

interest of science turer determines the selection of his problems. 340

facts and rating are en fused together so inextricably that they no longer distinguish can. 341

values of fact n split is, the pure Being an abstract it Shall face. 342 Each

theory is education selectively because they certain aspects of reality highlights, while others
can be in the background. 343 The opposite of

objectivity is secrecy. 344

fallacy of a descriptive to a normative e statement. 345

Logically e rules apply in the non-normative s. 346 All

knowledge through senses and experience is nothing but mere sham . 347 axiom of the

intelligibility of the world . 348 The objects of

Nature can never be exactly certain numbers are subordinate, as they incommensurable are.
349 The

transcendental e problem lies in the unity of sensibility and thought . 350 The phenomena are
products of our

minds there and our sensuality . 351 There is no

purely there thinking and not a pure feeling . 352 The purely formal

mathematics is through the principle of generalization emerged. 353 The

thinking is active , the sensuality passive . 354

power and fuel are not explainable . 355

judgment and inference lead last forever into infinity, while we have a need of completion feel
it. 356 "It may be the concept of

matter and its force twist and turn as you like, whatever you come across one last
incomprehensible, where not even on something absolutely absurd , as with the adoption of
forces through empty space act at a distance. There is no hope of ever resolve this problem,
the obstacle is a transcendent . It beruth that we finally nothing without all sense qualities can
imagine, but during the whole of our cognition is geared towards the qualities in mathematical
relationships dissolve. " - Friedrich Albert Lange, History of Materialism, Vol.2, Ffm 1974,
page 597

357 Our knowledge does not reveal to us the things in themselves, but only their ratio to our
senses . 358 The

contradiction of multiplicity and unity is the human mind ever own. 359 the "

logic of fact n " 360 "If the

vividness holds, gets on the process ad infinitum , who divulges it leaves the safe en ground. "
- Friedrich Albert Lange, History of Materialism, Vol.2, Ffm 1974, page 658

361 The vision does not take place in the eye, but in the brain . 362 most ordinary confusion
of

word and phrase . 363 For each

idea , it needs a sufficient band unit . 364 The

vision itself is closing. 365 It is the

difference , the perceived is, the increase is perceived and measured the mass of what already
exists. 366 Without the

ideal image of the world that we carry within us, there could be no pessimism. Only the ideal
of making the world bad . 367 The

tyranny of the Name s of things. 368 "The method, however, which both the

knowledge and the mastery of nature directs, requires nothing less than a constant destruction
of synthetic en forms under which us, the world appears to eliminate all Subjectively s. " - FA
Lange, History of Materialism, Vol.2, Ffm 1974, page 985

369 All categorization are sschemata arbitrarily. 370

fact are n arguments or concepts , but no facts. 371 " The set

A = A is indeed the basis of all cognition 's, but even no knowledge , but an act of the mind , it
is an act of original synthesis , by which as a necessary beginning of all thought s an equality
or an insistence to be set in the nature only relatively and almost, but never find absolute and
complete the set A = A thus also shows just on the threshold of the. logic the relativity and
ideality all our knowledge of. " - FA Lange, History of Materialism, Vol.2, Ffm 1974, 1010

372 error improper representational speed 373 In the

quantitatively are all incommensurable magnitudes and qualitative s method differences
except eight left and a single coefficient reduced : the number. 374

tyranny of arbitrary symbol systems

375 the Arithmomanie the abstract s calculations 376 The problem of the application of linear
"

either-or - logic "on nonlinear e system e. 377

order and chaos are only two sides of the same coin. 378

paradoxes suggest only then that the limit of a particular symbol system is s. 379
Methodological basic problem between

value judgment and reality surteil. 380

measurement fighting procedures may together incompatible be. 381 "Tantum cognoscitur,
quantum diligitur." (We

see only what we love .) -Augustinus 382 The recycling of

quality on quantities is the main concern of modern natural science . 383 The uncertainty
principle

Heisenberg s is the limit of testability and the reasoned application of causality . 384 "The
concept of

machine is so difficult to define , as that of a l ebendig s organism. " - Marshall McLuhan ,

The end of the book era, Dusseldorf / Vienna 1968, page 211

385 "The principle of transmitting not visually he phenomena such as the movement and the
energy in visual categories is always and everywhere the actual principle of " applied "
knowledge s. " - Marshall McLuhan, The end of the book era, Dusseldorf / Vienna 1968, page
212

386 Our knowledge of the micro and macro structure of the universe beruth on finer and finer
measurement and not on direct observation . 387 The on physical objects

perceived s properties are of state of the observer dependent . 388 "From the fact that the blue
things

look like when I wear blue glasses, can not conclude that they are not blue, but it must be
concluded that: to believe they were blue, there is no reason. " - Bertrand Russell ,
Autobiography Bd.3, Ffm 1977, page 190

389 "Savoir pour prevoir." knowledge to predict . That is the meaning of all science . 390 The
purpose of all terms is economy of thought , imagination sersparnis by summary equal he
experience s. 391 "

Euclid is a real despot, and the geometrical propositions, which he has handed down to us,
truly despotic are law e. Your legal despotism and the personal despotism of their legislature
are one and the same, namely the irresistible power of the evidence. " - Le Mercier de la
Riviere: L'Ordre Naturel of Essentiel de Societes Politiques, 1767, Book I, Kap.24 392 Only

mathematically s law s a must compulsory be expected Re- lease. For God a triangle must
necessarily have three angles. 393

Mathematics e law s can only by means of a fallacy it on the politically be applied en area by
tacitly presupposes that mathematical "laws" are the same,

The natural scientific e medicine achieved revolutionary progress e by all live -ended
operations on exact mechanical e explanations were returned. 397 There are two types of

law en: laws of nature and laws of the law .'s 398 The

science is impossible, the past and deepest reason all beings to explain. 399 Without

changing motion there is no time s and without form does not change. 400

times arise only with the molded en things. 401 Just what

the beginning and the end has to measured be. 402 The positive

conclusion beruth on the certainty . the premises 403 "It is a

crime is highest, the holiest , scientifically to be. " - Friedrich Nietzsche in Colli / Montinari
(Eds), CRSA BD6, Munich, 1988, page 17.

404 Mathematisierbarkeit is considered Code of true science . 405 The

calculability as standard best meets the scientific e ideal of exactness. 406 from

substance understood to function sbegriff 407 The

logic he did not come to the individual that matters, but the in the abstraction captured
General e. 408 Even at Galileo we find the set that the "book of

nature "in mathematically he language is written and should be read only in mathematical
cipher text. 409 "It is the

goal of science , experience as to objectively ming that its not historically it adheres moment.
This makes the scientific experiment by the way its methodological event. " - HG Gadamer,
The concept of experience in Wiehl, Reiner (eds), History of Philosophy Bd.8, Stuttgart 1981,
page 245

410 Due to the abstraction should objectivity be guaranteed. 411 The great book of

nature lies open before us. To be able to read it, we need the math, because it is written in
mathematical language. The natural processes are quantitatively and thus measurable , where
this is not readily the case, must the science , the make arrangement of the experiment so that
they are made to measure. 412 The dynamic method is mainly because

interested what 'happens' with things and not so much what they 'features' categorically. 413
The

psychoanalysis is a distinction smethode nothing another, a style of world view and the order
s verschiedenener fact n and feelings . 414 The method was interpretation of the elements of
this world by any

harmonize the idea . 415 consideration of the

nature after the quantitative s method. 416 The concepts of

natural law union world view are all of the question depending on position. 417 The
transformation of the

forms of thought , the "new" thinking . 418 In the field of

individuality nothing can be due to dead e and mechanically e express formulas. 419 instead
of the word "

law "may be" formula say " . 420 All things have

reality only in our mind e. 421 The subject of

natural science alone is the Physical . 422 "If we remain in us aware that such

formulas simply a practically have it, photographic means, to a certain view express, and
when we the sacred name of science in vain to our own stuff to praise , no harm can by our
actions arise. " - Lin Yutang, Wisdom of the smiling life, Stuttgart 1973, page 23

423 Since Galileo and Newton called the credo of modern natural science en: watch , measure
, calculate . 424

matter and mass were as basically identical understood. Similarly, were time and space fused
together. 425 For the physicist

exists only what is measured can be. 426 Exposure to

quality s difficult methodological task. 427 It's the old ambition of

power , the mere factuality in thinking necessity to transform . 428 with all these efforts the

Mentally to e according to the nature of the physical processes explain , the actual is subject
lost. 429 We

speak and think in objects n. 430 The seemingly simple distinction between

value judgment and facts fixed position shows that there is a rational not present solvable
problem. 431 The

thinking fabric of abstraction are under the conditions of a willed s effect. 432 With the

mind we are comprehensible s things over. 433 "What we call the modified method of

mentality accept (is) that we namely only the a priori things recognize what we ourselves put
into them. " - Immanuel Kant , Critique of Pure Reason, Stuttgart 1982, page 29

434 Our mistake is the logical en typing . 435 The

abstraction en the categories are images . But how images are to consider ? 436 The

number belongs to the world of form as the quantity in the world of analog computing s. 437
When the

time disregards arise paradoxes . 438 "The strange physicalism of the

metaphors we use to spirit strength phenomena to describe. " - Gregory Bateson, Mind and
Nature, Ffm, 1987, page 263

439 The objectivist believes that all phenomena in terms of quantity . can be examined and
evaluated and are 440 Kepler and Galileo formulated the principle that the

law s of nature through measurement to discover. 441 The

forced -like pursuit of ever more precise quantification of things. 442 to a

measurement you need a tool, but an electron has so little mass that every conceivable meter,
even if it is as light as a photon (light quantum), the position of the electron would change at
any attempt at measurement. 443 We can the course of

nature not observe , without changing it. Observation represents an intervention in the
observed. Observation changes the reality . 444 No

observation s system can observe yourself observing . 445

subject and object , energy and matter , are only two ways of one and the same reality . 446
The

thinking goes linearly ago, the reality is not. 447 A

Ding arises , by him attention turn. 448 "You can have two

causality in respect of what is happening think, either by the ' natural 'or' freedom '. " -
Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, Stuttgart 1982, pages 574

449 The science is a perception s example . 450 "Every 'Like', each way, where they may
lead, lead from the '

Now 'off. Wherever a road can take you there, because you already are. The goal and the path
are one . " - Ken Wilber, The Spectrum of Consciousness, Bern / Munich / Vienna 1987, page
309

451 The symbolic e thinking is indispensable - provided we do not confuse with reality . 452
The

I thought is the origin of all other thoughts . With the I-thought disappear, all other thoughts.
453 Follow "we are now the composition of the parts of each

organism , as far as we can, and never encounter but on a very simple and therefore Last, let a
unorganized, we lose ourselves at last in the calculation of the usefulness of all those parts
thereof for Bestande of the whole . " - Arthur Schopenhauer , selection from his writings,
Munich 1962, page 60

454 "There is no way to here and there is no way for now . " - Ken Wilber, The Spectrum of
Consciousness, Bern / Munich / Vienna 1987, page 308

455 We distinguish what law ens is (quid juris) from what the facts regards (quid facti). 456
"The

unity of consciousness is s condition of all knowledge , is under any view to 'for me' object
will be able to, because the unit without this manifold would not be united in one
consciousness. " - See Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, Stuttgart 1982, page 180.

457 The causality of phenomena beruth on the time condition. 458 "

Materially e things are nothing more than the product of our thought s and parts of s. Since all
fairs but merely abstraction is, the world of measurement and is matter a world of illusion .
All measurement is the product of thought from virtually en reasons. " -. See Ken Wilber, The
Spectrum of Consciousness, Bern / Munich / Vienna 1987, page 113

459 "But, the absolutely pure minds by, inwardness of the matter is a mere Grille; because this
is everywhere no object for the pure understanding, the transcendental object, however, which
may be the reason of this phenomenon, which we call matter is merely something which we
would not even understand what it is, if we even someone could say. For we can understand
nothing other than what one our words Corresponding in intuition leadeth with him. " -
Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, Stuttgart 1982, pages 361

460 "Where the continuous connection of all phenomena, in a context of nature , a

unnachlliches law is the law, all freedom must overthrow necessary. " - See Immanuel Kant,
Critique of Pure Reason, Stuttgart 1982, page 578.

461 "And here is the true mean, but a deceitful premise of 'absolute reality 'of phenomena,
immediately their adverse effect, the reason to confuse . After all, appearances are, then things
in themselves liberty not to save. " - Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, Stuttgart 1982,
pages 577

462 " causality has no meaning and no feature of its use, as only in the sense nwelt . " -
Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, Stuttgart 1982, page 643

463 The faulty compass in the evidence is that it is assumed, which is supposed to be proved.
464

measuring art and philosophy are two very different things. " - Immanuel Kant , Critique of
Pure Reason, Stuttgart 1982, pages 744

465 For the causality s law there is no mandatory e necessity, but merely a utility over the
experience s and rises to a certain extent the thinking habit. 466 The

science goes on what ' is ', the moral to this be what ' should '. 467 The

dogmatic e method must from the skeptical to distinguish s method. 468

basis sets are arbitrary fixing en by order or convention. 469 the method of '

ideas '. 470

fact n ask n and validity sfragen. 471 "From

induction sproblem and the demarcation sproblem almost all other problems have knowledge
theory derived. " - Karl Popper without further source

472 The choice of the purpose it is for the decision there. 473 There is no

logical e justification for generalization s. 474 The

Science thrives on the repeated observation . Reproducibility is, their magic formula. The
scientific experiment is a reproduction sanordnung. 475

definition are en dogmas . 476 On the

derivation is a practical - technically it interest . 477 Each

representation used generally e characters and universals , each set has the character of a
theory , a hypothesis. 478 The

immediate s experiences are only ' once 'given immediately. They are unique. 479 The
important

difference between a reason and a decision -making. 480 One

generalization we measure probability at. 481

simplicity can the problem be. 482 "All

measurement beruth on the finding of 'point coincidences'. 'Punktkoinizidenzen' in the strict

sense ., there are not two physical 'points' as a point of the measuring tape and a point of the
measured body can only be approached each other, but they can not coincide , ie coincide in
'a' point '. - Karl R. Popper, Logic of Research, Tbingen, 1989, page 87f

483 The seizure comes before morality . 484 For Popper is the

Nichtfalsifizierbarkeit of generalization s, and probability statements beyond doubt. 485 The

causality can sprinzip with the natural law be placed on a stage s. 486

causality is impossible, because we observed e object interfere . 487

generalization s are hypothetical . 488

Generalize de evidence is inadmissible. 489

nature are laws of observation safety phrases not logically derivable. (Induktionsproblen) 490
The basis of all

induction s theory n is the doctrine of the primacy of repetitions. 491 The

rule of thought is the repetition with which the true sparkle associated probability. 492 The

repeated occurrence of e appearance entitles us not to accept a general s law there. 493 The

Heisenberg states cal uncertainty principle, that the accuracy of our measurement en
uncrossable boundary has n. 494 If the
initial sets are not proven, it is
so the final phrases. 495

definition is being sdefinition and serves as such as evidential basis, as the principle (arche)
of the proof takes its output. The anarchist cognition theory rejects this principle as a
knowledge sbasis from. The reality is without principle is to Archie . 496 The world of

consciousness s consists of reduction , opposition and summary . 497 Each

science refers to a definable e objectivity . 498 The

experience of the experience is limited to the One . 499 "The

understanding has always been a One to his subject. " - Wilhelm Dilthey, The formation of the
historical world in the human sciences, Ffm 1981, page 261

500 The problem of a theory of knowledge s is its general validity. 501

terms are the practice of life s adult. 502 The

terms serve validity and usefulness in mind to secure. 503 A '

Description 'is only too happy with a' Declaration confused '. 504 The design of

science is the desire of the people for reliable em knowledge . The theory n the science
generally based on ' objective en 'data. Among them are 'at any time reproducible e findings'
understood. Only objective data are for the science of interest. We call these data often ' fact n
'. 505

lens only means that the data reproduced at any time, ie the particular subject independently
are. 506 method = Greek. methodos (investigate, pursue) the

path to the destination 507 "in all spheres of

Life s and the spirit it rich the original conditions to be replaced by constructions This claim.
objectively e reality to be, and if they are not , they are at least a step on the way to it. " -
William S . Haas, Western and Eastern thought, Reinbek 1966, page 145

508 Non-solutions offer, but problems show. 509 The

causal e declaration of individually en fact , n is never possible, since even a description of

even the smallest detail of the reality never exhaustively is conceivable . 510 "Only the '

law even 'was the most scientifically important to be e to the phenomena, ' personalized e
'operations could only' types' ie here: come as illustrative representatives of the laws, in
consideration; interested in them for their own sake seemed 'not scientific' interest to be. " -
Max Weber, Collected Essays on the Theory of Science, Tbingen 1988, p 186

511 " Logical e order of the terms on the one hand and empirical arrangement of the
conceptualized in space, time and cause it to appear linking the other hand, then so with each
other cemented that the temptation of the reality of violence do to in order to confirm the real
construction in fact, is almost irresistible. " - Max Weber, Collected Essays on the Theory of
Science, Tbingen 1988, p 204

512 "The light that those highest value ideas donate, falls respectively to an ever-changing
finite part of a vast chaotic stream of events , which then circulates through time. " - Max
Weber, Collected Essays on the Theory of Science, Tbingen, 1988, page 213f

513 The scientific e realization is with the finding Law en identical. 514 the

problem of the fact . 515

categories be applied to thinking foreign material. 516 "The question of the

subject and the sense of objectivity can only be asked and answered sense if is seen that a
theory that objectivity under will analyze disregarding the knowledge relation, exactly what
they discussed, are out of hand. Object is the meaning and only as such to illuminate
theoretically, as 'advantage' is a meaning. " - Werner Marx, Hans-Ludwig Ollig, materials for
neo-Kantianism -Discussion, Darmstadt 1987, page 69

517 A judgment on fact n can be from the above principles do not separate. because there is
no factual finding that is not already includes a basic assertion. Each judgment about a
particular case already includes a whole system one physics. There is no observation and
measurement before all theory and independently of their requirement s . 518 "Physical

objectivity has never something with the naive thing understood the sensual s perception do.
Mass, force , ether, atoms, magnetic, electrical potential, etc. are not directly related to
individual things such as table and tree; they rather theoretically e ' setting s and constructions'
is, directed in a the perceptible Measurable it and thus to transform it into an object of
physics; even the simplest measurement based on theoretical premises, principles, hypotheses,
axioms, which we call 'postulates of thinking s' to the world zoom bear. " - See Ernst Cassirer
in Hans-Ludwig Ollig, materials for neo-Kantian discussion, Darmstadt 1987. , page 268

519 The cognitive theoretical problem is the same everywhere: Generally valid knowledge
from experience . 520

perception are en synthetically e services.

it does not interfere the measurement. 523 "Always again rises as the task in the
identity of a representational s relationship, ie in the function of the ' is 'aside, what else
suddenly, as it were distributed to different dimension, indifferent or in unresolved
contradiction , adjacent stands. " - Richard Honigswald , Fundamental Problems of
Philosophy of Science, Bonn 1965, page 72

524 ' intuition 'does not mean a rigid component . 525 The

law of the state of affairs is the principle of objectivity . 526 "When observing a

'fault' of the processes causes, which it is charged, so the assumption lacks objectively he, of
all observation independently it processes any foundation. " - Richard Honigswald,
Fundamental Problems of Philosophy of Science, Bonn 1965, page 101

527 The assumption that phenomena in strict and exact finite direct frmigkeit run, is
unfounded. 528 "

terms are the elementary factors of knowledge , and in them a certain problem situation
reflects, they represent a relatively scarce language he form of a theorem . " -. Cf. Richard
Honigswald, Fundamental Problems of Philosophy of Science, Bonn 1965, page 218

529 to be "stressed Hardly needs that the problems of biology and the history of non-
biological and historical problems are. Because they relate to the question of the idea of
objectivity insonderheit the foundations of the system of science s. That biology and
historians may have all Anass itself to deal with them, hardly needs mentioning; also that they
have been doing to insure its own criteria. The flag under which they do so is irrelevant. In
substance, it always involves only one:. Around the reasons and forms of variation of the
object concept in the relevant research areas " - Richard Honigswald, Fundamental Problems
of Philosophy of Science, Bonn 1965, page 253

530 theories serve to ensure the objectivity of the subject identity of the perception .
sbestandes 531 Civil

dimensions meters, kilometers, etc. 532 "Why do you not

understood that you are missing altogether,

What you do not count ., do you think, is not true
What you do not weigh, has for you no weight;
What you do not mints, believes her did not apply. " - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe in
Konrad Lorenz, On Aggression - the Natural History of Aggression, Munich 1983, p 20 533
"Is the

natural only big because they are giving you? " - Friedrich Schiller in Konrad Lorenz, On
Aggression - the Natural History of Aggression, Munich 1983, page 23

534 The concept of the story says the ' unique e Done. 535 "The
science thinks nature not objects as goods , but free from the linkage with value s. " -
Heinrich Rickert , culture and natural science; Stuttgart 1986, page 36

536 Just try once, the reality 'exactly' to 'describe', ie with all their detail s, 'as it is', in terms
record, to thereby generate a dump to get from her, and you will probably soon see the futility
of such a company. The empirical reality that is proving to be one of us' immense diversity ',
which seems to be getting bigger, the more we immerse ourselves in them and they begin to
dissolve in their details, because even the' smallest 'piece contains more than any finite able to
describe man, yes, he of it in his terms, and thus in his knowledge can absorb, is almost
negligible compared to what he put aside must. " - Heinrich Rickert, culture and natural
science; Stuttgart 1986, page 49

537 " If we had the reality with words ' map ', so we stands as a knower in front of a principle'
unsolvable 'task, and so it is as if there is something that is done so far, ever allowed to make
the claim to be knowledge, even for the immanent truth sbegriff probably have to stick with it,
recognizing that not mapping by describing the 'phenomena', but 'reforming', and, as we may
add, in comparison to the real self, always' Simplify 'is. " - Heinrich Rickert , culture and
natural science; Stuttgart 1986, page 50

538 "For even when we the limits laid on each other yet so close, so always flows but the
reality itself with its continuous and therefore inexhaustible otherness between them
uncomprehended through. So we can with the terms only bridges over the stream of reality
propose that each arch may still be so small is what we 'no'. Sciences from real being to
change something. " - Heinrich Rickert, culture and natural science; Stuttgart 1986, page 53

539 The reality in its particularity and individuality is the limit for each natural scientific e
concept formation . 540 The purely

quantitative terms, e is unreal . 541 "So it is settled: the

High e is separated from the quantitative through a gap, on the psychophysics of the future
will beat any bridge. The rationalism of the seventeenth century liked to believe that any
'single' and merely 'extended' body is as simple sensation is set 'parallel' to, and that therefore
the reality more geometrico could treat., we should have finally learned today that the rational
'worlds' first product of generalize the abstraction are, and that they therefore although
certainly not stop, theoretically and practically valuable to be, but never coincide with
individual realities. The step from Homogeneous Heterogeneous s into which we have a
principle inexhaustible diversity leads is always the step from the unreal to the real, to the
well with the Rational from the Irrational coincides en. We can only make the step from
reality irrational to the rational terms, by not 'leave' the Quantifiable that is denied to us for
ever 'return' for the qualitative individual reality. Because we will never 'get out' of the terms
than that, what we 'put into it' in they have. The ' certificate ', as leading a complex of General
Affairs for custom back, arises from the fact alone that we are an ideal build it being purely
quantitative, in the, any 'point' is manageable, and that we then this conceptual world with the
individual reality 'confused', in the "there." no points - Heinrich Rickert, culture and natural
science; Stuttgart 1986, page 152f
542 We consider principles of things, which only truth condition of knowledge is. 543 "The

givenness itself means only the complete determination of what is thought , this is demanded
of thinking and to perform by thinking alone, and that comes so you never to completion, so
the fact remains problem, not the given, but rather the eternal task of science . This insight
itself - the result of the logic , as pure science of the modes of procedure of the scientific mind
it - means the highest point, which the mere intellect reached, but in so doing also its limit ,
you are all the areas of his knowledge the inner methodical. unity and enables its central
organization Therefore, the formation of the mind must rise up to this-pointer,., this survey is
its self-liberation the consciousness of its autonomy , which makes him master of himself and
nature . " - Paul Natorp in Hans-Ludwig Ollig, materials for neo-Kantian discussion,
Darmstadt 1987, page 110f

544 The basic relationship everything scientifically s thinking s is the ratio of the General s to
particular . 545 the

isolation trends concerning typify the method 546 "

subjectivity means the ratio of the Presented to presenter. " - Paul Natorp in HL Ollig,
materials for neo-Kantian discussion, Darmstadt 1987, page 294

547 There are for science no view , only construction . 548 "is fulfilling the terms of the

settlement , then also meet the objectivity . The way now, as law tes satisfies those conditions
is called justification . One might therefore instead of justification justifiably speak of
'justification' or 'objectivity'. " - Richard Honigswald in Hans-Ludwig Ollig, materials for
neo-Kantian discussion, Darmstadt 1987, page 356

549 The ultimate justification is the classic principle of rational s thinking. 550 "The question
is not of today. At all times already that was

unique , a touchstone for the forces of logic . " - Richard Honigswald in Hans-Ludwig Ollig,
materials for neo-Kantian discussion, Darmstadt 1987, page 363

551 Ockham 's Razor: One should not unnecessarily the essential things multiply . 552 The
dispute what

light is : wave or particle, light is both. 553 The classic

justification Sidee result that the political problems en 'more geometrico' are treated. 554 "

rationality is always a matter of method and thus the practice . " - Hans Albert , Critical
reason and human practice, Stuttgart 1984, p 78

555 "The closure of faith s system s is not therefore a requirement of logic or any other
objectively en instance, but a dictation of the will of s and the interests and needs se who are
behind him; their openness is a matter of morality . " - Hans Albert, Critical reason and
human practice, Stuttgart 1984, page 88

556 The natural scientific method E ends, where the area of the individual s life s, the person s
existence, the will 's freedom begins, and the whole moral . e world is sealed their 557 "Any

systematic acts straight, is always as a single-row result because, joins perhaps to a unilinear
circles. The thing, however, is almost never does. While the matter multidimensional is
assigned one-dimensional in every moment; while problematic has many centers, it assigns,
by perhaps developed many one-dimensional rows from a center; while the matter is concrete
and endless, she is placeable in shaping abstract and finally . It helps the fact that so applies to
the individual members side rows further dimensions, that uses several centers related to each
other and from each a beam of ball rows can unfold. But it is always more or less to
ultimately spatially bound e schemes, while the thing maybe to even the intricate system of
links, dimensions, locations, is incommensurable. Our order is a power tiveness and then
perhaps again a limiting this violence. " - Karl Jaspers, Psychology of World Views, Berlin /
Heidelberg / New York 1971, page 17

558 "The concept is like a dead s ratio, than which not remove it can be as defined in the
beginning has the idea, however, develops in the which it has detected. "She is a living,
evolving, gifted with generative power of optimism, which brings forth what was not nested
in it." - GWF Hegel, Karl Jaspers, Psychology of World Views, Berlin / Heidelberg / New
York 1971, page 62

559 "All thinking technology s, as they are to describe, are only one formal, the imitated ,
Reproducible. What in each case , the new content is the content, what is the creative
everywhere that never goes through the technology as such, but in all cases . intuited The
technology is the medium that the invention has other sources. " - Karl Jaspers, Psychology
of World Views, Berlin / Heidelberg / New York 1971, page 81

560 The transition has Logically s not a right. 561 "The vehicle research is 'mathematics', and
only as far as mathematics is applicable, a

mechanically it created the world everything. Qualitatively e, actually Intuitively e,

everything appears essentially in itself, is pushed out of the world The. nature is
entqualifiziert and so lifeless . It is' exact in law esbegriffe 'combined, so' predictable 'and
thereby' manageable '. In this world view alone, it means we see everything just as much as
we do can. Nature is a tool of the mind, as a mechanism, an apparatus, it is therefore quite
content abstract , very general . In this world view you do not see what usually really means
and wealth, has but a specific unreality with which, as it is a page of all reality, can achieve
the greatest effects in this. This worldview includes just what is the nature subjected us by
calculation entirely, ie especially the world according to their 'spatial' and 'temporal' side. " -
Karl Jaspers, Psychology of World Views, Berlin / Heidelberg / New York 1971, page 158f

562 "The question of what is reality , seems so simple. Reality in the physical world view ,
what ' measurable 'is; ie, the real is in space and time and therefore has in any case always
pages that are measurable in space and time di. " - Karl Jaspers, Psychology of World Views,
Berlin / Heidelberg / New York 1971, page 186

563 The systematic e is the only calculable e. 564 The

scientific e thinking is objectively e, thinking, which does not depend on the individual. 565
The

category n give concreteness , the ideas do not. 566 All in

time and space is subject to the idea of the mechanism . 567 Each evidence is hypothetical. "

theorems arise on the basis of certain rules of inference - only from certain axioms. While we
must acknowledge the theorems, if we have the truth of the corresponding axioms (and
derivative sregeln) accept. But nothing compels us to do so. " - Vittorio Hsle in forum for
philosophy Bad Homburg (eds), Philosophy and Justification, Ffm, 1987, page 245

568 " Justification en and justification s are not ' determined 'but' manufactured '. " - CF
Gethmann in forum for philosophy Bad Homburg (eds), Philosophy and Justification, Ffm,
1987, page 269

569 For the skepticism he there limit n of justifiable not, for the optimists. 570 The

progress is a sbegriff thought form . 571 The

Predictable e Quantitative and is the main criterion everything Technically s. 572 "

Science has from the beginning a twofold character: it is expedient to control the nature and
the mastery of man s. Before the science of exact science was and her name nor philosophy
and theology was, was their 'application' principally to govern men better and not nature. " -
Otto Ullrich, technology and domination, Ffm 1979, page 68

573 Idealistic e principles in the form of mathematically defining principles play a central role
in the 'discovery' of natural law e. 574 "All

science would be superfluous if the appearance sform and the essence of things coincided
directly. " - Karl Marx in Otto Ullrich, Technology and dominion, Ffm 1979, page 71

575 "The rule s know about the nature proceeds from ' adjusted ', isolated processes. A
complex process, a composite 'labor process', of nature for man to dominate in the same way
it once required a large number of particular law s, and the other is the natural material must
also 'sufficiently straightened his', thus the synthesized process also 'really' predictable runs. "
- Otto Ullrich, technology and domination, Ffm 1979, pages 101

576 Typical of the scientifically s approach is to break the uncontrollable s overall process in
isolated, particularistic identifiable individual processes. 577 "The foundations of our

social s system s and much less investigated than the dust of the moon. The excrement of the
racers are analyzed in more detail , as the cold sweat of small school children. " - H. Kreuch
in Otto Ullrich, technology and domination, Ffm 1979, pages 341

578 Only when practicable s possibility of separation from His and Shall , of information and
interest can science value free e produce information. 579 The human

work is methodically by pure time measured en quantified . 580 An important methodological

principle is the random

repeatability of a law eserzeugenden experiment. 581 "The basic

spirit is esttigkeit the ' conceptual e capturing '. " Alfred North Whitehead, Process and
Reality, Ffm, 1987, page 82 582 Our

classified e experience is the result schematized he thought forms such as causality , substance
, quality , quantity, etc. 583 "Basically it all depends

scientifically s observation always on the assumption that the directly observed immutability
of any instrument for seconds, hours, months or years will continue. "- Alfred North
Whitehead, Process and Reality, Ffm, 1987, page 244 584 Nothing

Generally it is ever true or false . 585 "The

measure is a relation ". - GWF Hegel, Science of Logic, Vol.1, Ffm, 1986, page 8

586 "The number is a unsensuous he subject, and the study of it and its compounds a un
sensual it business. " - GWF Hegel, Science of Logic, Vol. 1, Ffm, 1986, page 398

587 "The Quantum by an indifferent limit is taken, is the side on which an existence is
unsuspected attacked and ruined. It is the 'List' of the term it, a life to take on this side of the
its quality does not seem to come into play. " - GWF Hegel, Science of Logic, Vol.1, Ffm,
1986, page 398

588 the boundaries classical terms " matter "," "causality "," substance ", "time", "space" etc.
589 "The experimental dialogue with

nature that modern science discovered based on less on passive he observation rather than on '
practically it work '. It comes down to the physical reality to manipulate it in such a way to
'show' that they so closely as possible a theoretically corresponds to s description., the
phenomenon under study must be prepared and isolated until an ' ideal en situation 'comes
close, which it does physically unattainable, but the assumed conceptual s scheme
corresponds. " - Prigogine / Stengers, dialogue with nature, Munich 1990, page 47

590 The objectivity of a description is currently defined by the fact that each reference to the
author is missing. 591 The classical

idealization that described in our isolated world led, can be with respect to the microscopic
world no longer perform. 592 "Something with

words describe, and with eyes Watched e are irrational e sizes to each other. The perception is
in fact a continuum, the description may not be. The task by describing the object display
properly can be resolved only on different, never the same way. It is always a transformation
of the continuum, the concrete object, in the discrete, in an existing individual sentences
description, which is always a judgment with contained the descriptor, and need not be
described in some , ignored, otherwise contracted, because otherwise the Description an
infinity would be e. It is like this transformation of a continuum of transformation of a surface
in a single scoring. " - EFD Schleiermacher , Hermeneutics and Criticism, Ffm 1977, page
246

593 " order is certainly not a property of matter and must you be forced upon from the
outside. " - Paul Feyerabend, without further source

594 " term s thinking can lead to nothing more than the manslaughter trial against the live
-ended world : In our attempts to touch the world and to understand , we have disembodied
and in the empty apartments of our associations and general concepts hineinkomplinentiert. "
- Gustav Landauer , without further source

595 , the anthropocentric e recovery s logic

596 'That' drops a stone is' illogical ',' like 'a stone falls is' logically '.

for our quest for the greatest possible generalization , then, is the ' time wasting 'to avoid
something for certain special cases prove to have, possibly with it unlimited he can prove
generality. " - Bertrand Russell, Conquest of Happiness, Ffm 1978, 278

601 "Generally speaking, which is scientifically s progress a product of the analysis and the
artificial isolation of certain elements have been. " - Bertrand Russell, The development of my
thinking; Ffm 1988, page 282

602 The very term ' observation 'contains in one life the traits that are not physical-
objectively . possible to define 603 "For all

spirit strength, it is in the language , the science or the art based on the use and on the power
of symbols . " - Werner Heisenberg , order of reality , Munich 1989, pages 129

604 "The question of 'right' or 'wrong' , in all rigor, within a idealization , but not in relation to
reality are made and decided. " - Werner Heisenberg, order of reality, Munich 1989 , page 145
605 The important question setting is already more than half way to solve a problem s. 606 In
classical

physics play only beoabachtbar e sizes a role. 607

abstraction s are forms solidified previous experience s. 608 Classical physics was based on
the

illusion that we the world can describe, without us even to speak. 609 What we

observe is not nature itself, but nature, our type of question is exposed position. 610 "Not

individuals , but more or less ideal ical masks ; not reality , but an allegorical e universality . "
- Friedrich Nietzsche, Human, All Too Human - A Book for Free Spirits, Frankfurt 1982,
pages 159

611 We can never the whole thing to know , but have to choose . 612 "The phenomena when
closed the

unit s appear, must be respected in its unity and can only at the cost of the destruction of what
should be studied analytically broken into pieces. " - Perls / Hefferline / Goodman, Gestalt
Therapy - Basics, Munich 1991, p 21

613 " feelings are means of detecting s. You are not about thinking obstacles. " - Perls /
Hefferline / Goodman, Gestalt Therapy - Basics, Munich 1991, pages 205

614 types are always intellectually e structure s and as such never fully in the reality
vorfindbar In none. lives * NO = there are pure types . 615 Max Weber understands the
problem of social scientific

objectivity as a question of the relationship between concept formation and experience . How
can we of the objects of our perception of form concepts and valid identify given the infinite
variety of real existents . 616

Subjectively e value notions form the basis for the conceptual en framework. 617 Each

conceptual description of reality abstracted from the diversity of the specific peculiarities .
618 The

reality itself can not in any conceptual system be returned. 619 The

generalized de method is aimed at legislation from esaussagen and the complete reduction of
the High s on the Quantitative. Such a science is nothing on the peculiarity s the reality . 620
The classical natural

sciences to solve the problem of the 'hiatus irrationalis 'in that they of the particularity of the
Really en abstract . 621 The

abstract de procedure corresponds to a nomological s view of nature . 622 "

Custom -Historical events can not generally e law explain e. There is no system of
nomological statements as accurate and complete Anyway, from which one can derive any
description of an individual event. For this reason, our directed at individual phenomena can
knowledge interest not by the means of natural science are satisfied. Nomothetisches and
ideographic research interests are independent of each other and are abruptly juxtaposed: The
Law and the event remain as the last, incommensurable magnitudes of our world .
imagination coexist " - Wilhelm diaper band in Guy Oakes, The limits of cultural studies
concept formation, Ffm, 1990, page 54

623 terms are structure for the purpose of knowledge extraction. They are made by relying on
particular properties relating to the world of physical and psychological facts. 624 Each

knowledge consists in judgment s, any statement which raises a claim to knowledge, is a

judgment. 625 The nature of

science is on the ' validity 'of their terms is interested, not in the individual s designs. 626 The
nature

scientifically s knowledge arises not from an interest in the reality itself, but grew out of our
general e Act to uncover irregularities that will be valid for the reality should. 627 ".. those

sense for truth , the sense of basically safety is. " - Friedrich Nietzsche, works Vol.2, hrg. Karl
Schlechta, Ffm / Berlin / Vienna 1984, page 31

628 "Today, speaking at the science union philosophy skilled reader must often spend a lot of
patience, he wants outdated, the older consciousness study sphilosophie arrested texts. " - Guy
Oakes, The boundaries of cultural studies concept formation, Ffm 1990, page 125

629 "The question of the objectivity of scientific en concept formation depends exclusively on
the 'validity of the value e 'from. " - Heinrich Rickert in Guy Oakes, The limits of cultural
studies concept formation, Ffm 1990, page 130

630 "It is very first requirement scientifically he thought wise, the separation of the outer
world of the ideas recognize the world and perform. With the assumption of the existence of
an independent outer world science linked now equal to the question of causality , ie
according to the law sensitivity in world affairs as one of our sensations quite independent
term . " -. Cf. Max Planck, On the Nature of Free Will, Ffm, 1990, page 99

631 "A science that the predicate of himself objectivity but knows in principle, so that speaks
their own judgment. " - Max Planck, On the nature of free will, Ffm, 1990, page 125

632 "We are not thinking frogs, no Objektivier - and recording apparatus provided with cold
bowels ... " - Friedrich Nietzsche, Works Vol.2 hrg. Karl Schlechta, Ffm / Berlin / Vienna
1984, page 286

633 The mere fact that the subject is aware that they observed is, can be a fatal error source.
634 "A physical

measurement is reproducible if its result is not of the individuality depends of men, neither by
place and time of measurement or other circumstances This means, however, that for the
measurement result decisive. outside of the observer is located. " -. Cf. Max Planck, On the
nature of free will, Ffm 1990 Page 182

635 "For, strictly speaking, there is no single physical issue that directly, without the aid of
theory , through measurement can be checked s and clearly answered. Each measurement
result is indeed a composite type in each measurement always operate several different
physical processes together, their number and variety with the resolution of the measurement
is the immeasurably increases, so that there is always a theory must be used to unravel the
tangle and interpret. " - Max Planck, The nature of free will, Ffm, 1990, page 201f

636 "The hope, by measuring a fairly direct insight into the nature of the law to win
probability atomic operations, is getting further into the distance. This simply stems from the
fact that the issues to be decided are always further and that our measuring instruments that
they all consist of an enormous number of atoms, this delicacy is no longer able to follow. , it
is impossible to explore the inside of a body , if the is probe greater than the whole body. " -
Max Planck, On the nature of free will, Ffm, 1990, page 207

637 "After it has once pointed out that we, the measurement to be able surement results to
understand the philosophical presuppositions of the classical physics have to give up remains
for theoretical research no other way left than to novel abstract s term sbildungen to proceed.
This train is bound to develop, to him will change anything no power in the world. " - Max
Planck, On the nature of free will, Ffm, 1990, page 208

638 "The words are in our way! - Wherever the Ancients hinstellten a word, because they
thought they had made a discovery. How different it was in truth! - They had touched on a
problem, and while they thought, 'solved' to have it, they had created a barrier to the solution.
- Now we must at every realization stumble over rock hard immortalized words, and it is
rather break a leg than a word. " - Friedrich Nietzsche, works Vol.2 hrg, Karl Schlechta, Ffm /
Berlin / Vienna 1984, page 45.

639 "' Know thyself! ' is the whole science . Only at the end of the knowledge of all things,
man will have discovered himself. Because the thing s are the limits of man. " -. Friedrich
Nietzsche, Works Vol.2 hrg, Karl Schlechta, Ffm / Berlin / Vienna 1984, page 45

640 "Never hold back or hide something you what to think your thoughts can be! Swear it to
you! It belongs to the first probity of thinking s. You must every day and your campaign
against yourself lead. A victory and a conquered hill are no longer your concern, but the truth
- but also your defeat is no longer your concern. " -. Friedrich Nietzsche, Works Vol.2, hrg of
Karl Schlechta, Ffm / Berlin / Vienna 1984 , page 208
641 from Indefinite en on to Chargeable

642 "There is no knowing only making e method of science ! We have tentatively proceed
with things, soon angry, soon well be against them and justice , passion and cold have
successively for them. This speaks to the things as a police officer, that as a confessor, a third
party as a wanderer and the curious. Soon with sympathy, now with rape you will wrest them
something; one leads awe of their secrets forward and available for inspection, a turn
indiscretion and mischief in the Declaration of secrets. " - Friedrich Nietzsche, works Vol.2
hrg, Karl Schlechta, Ffm / Berlin / Vienna 1984, page 224.

643 ". .. alone right want, as all pure e lo wants. " - Friedrich Nietzsche, works Vol.2, hrg of
Karl Schlechta, Ffm / Berlin / Vienna 1984, page 365.

644 " logic , ie enforcement of consent by reason . " -. Friedrich Nietzsche, Works Vol.2, hrg
of Karl Schlechta, Ffm / Berlin / Vienna 1984, page 488

645 Each science leads diversity to unity back. 646 "The

problem of science can not be on the floor of science detected are . " - Friedrich Nietzsche,
KSA Bd.1, Colli / Montinari (eds), Munich 1988, p 13

647 "All science can the existence as comprehensible and thus justified appear. " - See
Friedrich Nietzsche, KSA Bd.1, Colli. / Montinari (Hg), Munich 1988, p 99

648 "... this supposes e reality is nothing but a fantastic lppisches trifling . " - Friedrich
Nietzsche, KSA Bd.1, Colli / Montinari (eds), Munich, 1988, page 125

649 "We divide the Ding an e-sex, we denote the tree as masculine, the plant as feminine:
which randomly ! transmissions en " - Friedrich Nietzsche, KSA Bd.1, Colli / Montinari (eds),
Munich, 1988, page 878

650 "A nerve impulse transmitted first in a picture! first metaphor . " - Friedrich Nietzsche,
KSA Bd.1, Colli / Montinari (eds), Munich 1988, p 879

651 "The construction of the terms is in fact an imitation of time-space and number of
conditions on the ground of the metaphor n ". - Friedrich Nietzsche, KSA Bd.1, Colli /
Montinari (eds), Munich 1988, p 886

652 " Ideas are not knowledge concepts, they do not fall into the field of theoretical en, they
belong to the realm of practical en reason . " - Alois Riehl , Introduction to Contemporary
Philosophy, Leipzig / Berlin 1919, page 168

653 " ideas are will phurization and alone as targets of creation and action s must be
understood. They are valid, but they are not. Ideas are concepts will not tangible terms . " -
Alois Riehl, Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy, Leipzig / Berlin 1919, page 166

654 " Ideas are never reality s, nor can they be justified by reality. Your determination is to
create realities that are not yet ". - Alois Riehl, Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy,
Leipzig / Berlin 1919, page 168

655 There is no knowledge of God , there is no way, the principle otherworldly e in Hither
categories . Understanding the science , however, is by the system in term applied. 656 The
relationship between

mind and body is incomprehensible ;. reasons this incomprehensibility are irrefutably 657

existence is according to Hume no idea . Would being an idea, it would the limit be suspended
between reality and fiction . 658 The critical method is the fundamental

separation of the ideally s knowledge factors of the empirical s. 659 The cardinal question of

cognition theory : what does objectively e truth , what is objectivity? 660

understanding is, from reasons . derived 661 Lambert already knew the principle of a

kononisch s science His definition was:. Scientific knowledge is used to experience . making
en superfluous, and therefore what we should have learned yet to determine ahead " . - See
Alois Riehl , The philosophical criticism Bd.1, Leipzig 1924, page 224

662 What we are in a relationship of cause and effect thinking connected, we think of as
necessary connected. The effect, as we believe, does not follow merely on the cause, it is
made from it, it has revealed; it depends on the cause, so that they could not enter without
one. The ratio of causality is a relationship necessary he link, and this necessity in the relation
of cause and effect is the real problem. 663

sensations can not add to sensations, scrape it off of sensations. 664 The

numbers are the simplest and generally most terms that we have, and the difference of the
numbers, the numerical difference is the clearest and most definite, we know. 665 Each state
goes through un

noticeable on e grade to the next. 666 "The

causality is the postulate of the reasons for the change , the principle of this justification - the
principle of identity . " - Alois Riehl, Philosophical Studies from four decades; Leipzig 1925,
page 213

667 In order limits must examine you exceed it. 668 The requirement of

comprehensibility is achieved by the identity of the processes. 669

identity is there only where the specific differences are apart in time. 670 "'

Explain ' ie, an appearance by another in the form of an ' equation to express'. establish the
possibility of such an equation, implies the 'comparability' of phenomena. Where such does
not occur, which can judgment only a ' uncomprehended it 'Clash of the phenomena express .
" - Alois Riehl, Philosophical Studies from four decades; Leipzig 1925, 122f 671 It should not
be: '

something . 'is red and blue, but' me 'is red and blue 672 Each

term is a ' problem '. 673 "Since

Kant the dogma broke Semitism, is the question of the reality of the external world, the most
important yes the real basic problem of philosophy is true that is. empiricism with the
decision on this issue at hand without examination of the basic concepts of experience, he
draws attention to things that are just as they are just ".. - Alois Riehl, Philosophical Studies
from four decades; Leipzig 1925, page 6

674 "Because the experiment is an 'intention' observation , the intention or the. scientific e
same purpose beruth on the forethought of success. " - Alois Riehl, Philosophical Studies from
four decades; Leipzig 1925, page 1f

675 " substance ',' force ',' cause ',' change ',' movement '. Whoever these concepts taken for
granted, and it is taking from them the same scientific en blocks, the world to conceptual
construct , procedure is at least premature, and is at risk due to be forced by the 'criticism of
the terms', this scientific Baupolizei, his whole building ablate again. " - Alois Riehl,
Philosophical Studies from four decades; Leipzig 1925, page 3

676 There are sentiments en and value postures radiating feeling e, where resistance and
durability can not be denied. 677 In the beginning were

feeling skomplexe - not the logos ; the Angemutetsein, not thinking ; the Diffuse - not the
Personality of; the zustndliche , not the representational e Experience; the experience, not the
ego-and object-consciousness. 678 The 'ideographic' technique explored in contrast to

nomothetic s, what is unique, special, unrepeatable . 679

Abstract e terms are unobserved to real-existent beings, where no sharp distinction between '
real he 'and' mentally he 'existence distinction is. 680

Scientifically only such object sbestimmungen recognized that to be observable e,

controllable fact n, on 'tangible thing related e '. 681 The old mythical creatures

soul , society , will , etc. 682 The

Physical and Mental are two sides of the same process. (Psychophysics) 683 The most
ordinary

confusion of word and phrase . 684 Our

terms do not depend on the objects n, but the items according to our ideas. We do not accept
the world true , as in fact is, but as a result of our consciousness appears sstruktur. 685 What

developed is merely a logical size. 686 We can

properties and activities difficult as consisting of himself think that's why we take them on, as
if they were the thing inherent in s. 687 A psychology that the

soul avoids nbegriff leads, inevitably the same thing under different names again. 688 The

soul e life is in constant flux . 689 "

object and thinking are an insoluble relationship . " - Bruno stomach in flat / Holzhey (Hg),
epistemology and logic in neo-Kantianism, Hildesheim 1980, page 558

690 recognition is affirmation or negation , ie take a position . 691 The

problem of the subject of it, or of objectivity is usually ignored. 692 "Under

regulations of the particular under the General So in all cases the nature of the evidence s. " -
William diaper tape in flat / Holzhey (Hg), epistemology and logic in neo-Kantianism,
Hildesheim 1980, page 358

693 science is nothing more than a means for solving practical problems it. 694 Where

Generally it as equality or similarity exists, is control and objectivity possible ie independence

of what is stated by the statement ends reachable. 695

lens is called a statement about a consensus among many or all people is reached. 696 Any

definition s have a ' claim 'as a' demand 'in itself. In the 'questio facti' mixes the 'questio juris'
with a. The description itself is thought to Standard . 697 The problem of the

reduction is a problem of legal production. 698 "As little as

size per se, except as this or that size 'are', just as there is a certain size except in terms of a
comprehensive sizing system . And the natural scientific e experiment teaches by all leads to
specific sizes and numbers, nothing more than that the ' experience 'just in their' special 'but at
the same time thoroughly law 'regulated' is. " - Ernst Cassirer in Flat / Holzhey (Hg),
epistemology and logic in neo-Kantianism, Hildesheim 1980, page 296

699 "For there is no observation without us a specific question of the nature set, and no such
question can be asked, without that we have a possible link in their of individual data .
mentally anticipate the ' idea 'is thus not something for later fact should occur, but it is already
included in the mere reduction and determination of the fact unabridged and in their overall
function. " - Ernst Cassirer in Flat / Holzhey (Hg ), epistemology and logic in neo-
Kantianism, Hildesheim 1980, page 306
700 "The object thought even if it is detected in its purity and universal meaning, are also the
special methods be material. He constituted power of his logical valence s the ' value 'just as -
just under a different reference system s - as the reality constituted; he dominates the story as
well as the nature of research and bridged in this manner waive the specific methods without
them. " - Richard Honigswald in Flat / Holzhey (Hg), epistemology and logic in neo-
Kantianism, Hildesheim 1980, page 290

701 There is no order in the nature , order is only in the human mind . 702 "The thinking
absolutely foreign

matter is removed as soon as once recognized and acknowledged that the mere assertion that
it 'is matter' such, the nominal moment of logical s, the nominal moment of the term s and
judgment s includes in itself. " - Ernst Cassirer in Flat / Holzhey (Hg), epistemology and
logic in neo-Kantianism, Hildesheim 1980, page 289

703 "The object thought is not the idea of a thing, although each ' thing 'by is constituted him.
It is the idea of a general relationship most, of each other is subjected to a certain extent. It's
the thought of a formal application principle, the highest condition than those system of e
relationship s dominates, the man ' Science 'and' reality 'calls. For both want to be objective
and both are only force that formal validity principle found. " - Richard Honigswald in Flat /
Holzhey (Hg), epistemology and logic in neo-Kantianism, Hildesheim 1980, page 288

704 "The statement that the truth of knowledge the accordance with the subject means e turns
out to be circular : because it 'represents' the question until it purports to solve. The concept of
'object' can give us a satisfactory answer, because the 'object' but in a different twist, the
actual content after but completely identical, is repeated in it. " - Ernst Cassirer in Flat /
Holzhey (ed), Epistemology and logic in the neo-Kantianism, Hildesheim 1980, page 272

705 The logic of the object it 706 "I hear the sound 'and'

the sound will play me ', these are not two facts, but one. " - Paul Natorp in Flat / Holzhey
(Hg ), epistemology and logic in neo-Kantianism, Hildesheim 1980, page 260

707 No identity is a priori given , but must first be generated are. 708 "The true beginnings
and foundations of

knowledge are everywhere objectively e unit s. " - See Paul Natorp in. Flat / Holzhey (Hg),
epistemology and logic in neo-Kantianism, Hildesheim 1980, page 166

709 "The level of 'pure' subjectivity would be identical to the level of absolute uncertainty . "-
Paul Natorp in Flat / Holzhey (ed), Epistemology and logic in the neo-Kantianism,
Hildesheim 1980, 165 710 "'

Shared 'exists only in the sense of a given task, but not as a date of knowledge . . The
supposedly Erstgegebene is actually rather the popular " -. Cf. Paul Natorp in Flat / Holzhey
(Hg), epistemology and logic in neo-Kantianism, Hildesheim 1980, page 164
711 "The object is positive, the ' law '; he means the persisting unit , including the changing
diversity of the phenomenon conceptually united will and determined. " - Paul Natorp in Flat
/ Holzhey (eds), epistemology and logic in neo-Kantianism, Hildesheim 1980, page 153

712 Each change refers to the unit of subject . it 713 all

reality sprobleme are problems of construction . 714 "The

continuity is a thinking law . " - Hermann Cohen in Flat / Holzhey (Hg), epistemology and
logic in neo-Kantianism, Hildesheim 1980, page 108

715 " object as knowledge are and remain problems of connection. " - Hermann Cohen in
Flat / Holzhey (Hg), epistemology and logic in neo-Kantianism, Hildesheim 1980, page 115

716 "The object shape is logically e principle at all. The material as such is the illogical e. The
category is therefore the logical primary phenomenon. " -. cf. Werner flat in flat / Holzhey
(Hg), epistemology and logic in neo-Kantianism, Hildesheim 1980, page 50

717 "The consensus of the Lore as a criterion of truth is then in operational behaviorism on
the consensus of all extended. In order to get to the animal experiment, the survey method, the
objective, the subjective experience of everyone. Schlechtweg You can ask him about
everything: politics and society , religion and morality ; can ask him what science is and what
is meant by aggression understand the reasons why you should get a divorce if you do not
already should allow sixteen year olds to all the movies, etc. Mr. and Mrs. Anyone know
everything. One must only ask about the rules of statistics. And has many ask of them, at least
so many that you significances can be calculated. Since everyone can not always express his
opinion in a desirable clarity, we formulated the questions so that he only with yes or no or
undecided need to respond. Or is it sentences whose claim he accept or reject, or a polarity
profile prior to which he need only indicate whether the inquired object was to assign one or
more of the other pole. - - - The survey method along with the statistic has a firm place in
today's psychology. With it continues in the science, the democratic principle or the law of
large numbers by. The question is whether the results thus obtained as a pure actual values
have to be considered on judgment distributions and text stocks or whether they also
Sollenswert e are, that is, whether the statistically most frequent opinion can be valid. " -
Ludwig J. Pongratz, problem history of Psychology, Bern / Munich 1984, page 320f

718 Hermann Cohen took the principled theoretical thesis that thinking being generated. 719
The problem of

objectivity is the problem of objective, or general en ' validity 'of the knowledge s. 720 Each

realization is object slogische knowledge. 721 The

knowledge is process unabschliebar . Evident is an endless task. 722 The

science will only observe , but not standards set. 723 "The basic idea of the
economic en liberalism there is something 'Economic' in the political s life to isolate and this
economic in a ' socially en ' value to measure diameter. " - Gunnar Myrdal , The Political
Element in the national economic doctrine Education, Berlin 1932, page 212

724 The case of curve a thrown from the window sheet is hard to construct in advance. 725
From

logically en machine you get hardly out more than you hineigesteckt. 726 "The

research often suffers from far too much originality in principles ask. " - Gunnar Myrdal, The
Political Element in the national economic doctrine Education, Berlin 1932, page 219

727 The method , problem solutions by definition to replace s, is not a particularly fruitful it
method. 728 For

definition sfragen are questions of expediency and not the truth . 729 The '

economically e 'problem area ekes out a peculiar intermediate existence between the'
technically en 'and the ' ethically en 'problem. 730 "The

uniform structure e scientifically he knowledge se is obtained and secured by the art of s

controlled experiment s, the mathematization of experience and the formulation of law
maigkeiten. " -. See Joseph Needham, scientific universalism, Ffm 1979, page 9

731 "I used once said that science had to be compared with a sharp knife. All things that can
be in contact with him, along the blade cut . The mysterious most things like life , mind ,
emotion and will of the section can thus not escape. " - Chan Tung-sun in Joseph Needham,
scientific universalism, Ffm 1979, page 48

732 "Of course geometry was a major pillar of modern science , but she had the negative
effect too quickly the faith of all possible abstract en, timeless axiomatic law to strengthen e,
which should be self-evident supposedly, and they went on to a great willingness to strict
logical e and theologically e to accept formulations. As these with the authority were equipped
by the Roman clergy of the Latin law had inherited sgelehrten, was after the power increase,
the merchant ts class, the explosion of the Reformation inevitable; the West is still suffering
from the keywords that time. China was against it algebraically and 'Babylonian', not
geometric and 'Greek'. opposites were therefore rather than practical because as approximate
and theoretically committed and absolutely no one felt for the formulation timeless axiomatic
laws. From this it probably stirred the ethical ideas, which can be described as empirical,
historical and 'statistically', the little ideological e Fanatik knew and no persecution of religion
for its own sake. " - Joseph Needham, scientific universalism, Ffm 1979, page 248f

733 All knowledge beruth on observation s, this set equal frmigkeit the Really s advance,
since each experiment only a limited e time span lasts. beruth So all knowledge primarily on a
belief in the reality of time. 734 The
scientific e causality is ethically neutral. 735 "

law s are if-then-relation s, not because relationships. " - Edgar Zilsel, The social origins of
modern science, Ffm 1976, page 11

736 "The modern science turers, the substantial en forms occult he quality en omit the
phenomena of having nature through mathematical e law made to explain e. " - Isaac Newton,
Edgar Zilsel, The social origins of modern science, Ffm 1976, page 92

737 experiment and> mathematical analysis as the two pillars of modern science . 738 Mere

observation is passive and means 'wait and see'. The experiment, however, is an active
research method. 739 The

causal e Declaration became the main target of experimental science . 740 The

cause is the forerunner of the law there. 741 The validity of macro

Act s is not affected by quantum mechanics. 742 the usual

mess of logic and perception . 743 As

Locke Democritus was convinced that as heat, taste and color not actual properties of an
object s are, but that our sense organs are responsible. Properties such as weight, density and
hardness, however, should still be the object s itself inherent. 744 "The Geometry deals with
exact circles, no sensual

noticeable it is object but perfectly circular, even if we use our circles so carefully, it will but
always some imperfections and Unregelmiakeiten give It may be concluded that all strict.
logically e thinking only of ideal objects as opposed to - Bertrand Russell, History of Western
Philosophy, Vienna / Zurich 1988, page 58> sensual .'s perceptible objects applicable " 745 "

Logically e opposites are to our convenience been invented. " - Bertrand Russell, History of
Western Philosophy, Vienna / Zurich 1988, p 179 746 "The

Scientist features do not, 'what' he thinks , but 'how' and 'why' he believes it. " - Bertrand
Russell, History of Western Philosophy, Vienna / Zurich 1988, page 537 747 The

logical e system atisierung the scientific en operation is generalization accomplished. 748

Each method is an

order sprinzip. 749 The mere

accumulation of facts is confusing . 750 There are basically just

words , for the knowledge of the world are issued. 751 "The being that we can see is one
word and nothing else, as the definition of a general en generic term. " - Bertrand Russell,
History of Western Philosophy, Vienna / Zurich 1988, Page 621 752 '

need 'is something that the mind is not in the objects n. 753 "We only take the first and last
element of this process, the

wool and the movement true , and if we believe that a direct causal link between being able to
find them, then we are wrong. " - Bertrand Russell, History of Western Philosophy, Vienna /
Zurich 1988, page 679 754 Without

induction would be no science possible. The induction is independent but logically it principle
that neither of the experience can be concluded, nor from other logical principles. 755 "The

abstraction as a negative interest causes eo ipso generalization . " -. Edmund Husserl,

Logical Investigations, Vol 2, Part 1, Tbingen 1980, page 151 756 "The mere existence of a
content in

mentally s relationship is nothing less than the Gemeintsein . " 165 Edmund Husserl, Logical
Investigations, Vol 2, Part 1, Tbingen 1980, -. 757 "The mere

Erlebtsein as the V of content orgestellt be defined, and to call in transfer all experienced
content at all idea, that's one of the smartest idea sverflschungen which the philosophy
knows. " -. Edmund Husserl, Logical Investigations, Vol 2, Part 1, Tbingen 1980, page 165
758 "What '

meaning 'is, can not define , it is a descriptive Last . " -. Edmund Husserl, Logical
Investigations, Vol 2, Part 1, Tbingen 1980, page 183 759 "What we do not

think can, may not be what can not be, we can not think. " -. Edmund Husserl, Logical
Investigations, Vol 2, Part 1, Tbingen 1980, page 239 760 In the

logical s definition is the fluctuation of the word meaning a limit to be set. 761 Just behind the
'self

-evident en 'hide the most difficult problems . 762 In the whole of Greek philosophy open to
latent was the axiom: The

language reflects the world , which itself logos is like. 763 "In the

language which is real and negates the symbolic donated e. " . - See Bernhard Taureck,
psychoanalysis and philosophy - Lacan in the discussion, Ffm, 1992, page 41 764 "Lacan
announces the end of the

representation : the language represents not, it exists as a body , as a gesture or silence . " -
See Bernhard Taureck, psychoanalysis and philosophy -. Lacan in the discussion, Ffm, 1992,
page 63 765 What we for
principles hold of the things themselves, is in truth only condition of knowledge . 766 There is
no

meaning that does not need another important points. 767 Exploring the

truth is the supreme knowledge of all targeted science s. 768 The

psychology considers the thinking as it is , the logic as its intended . 769 "No

truth is a fact , ie, a time- specific. " -. Edmund Husserl, Logical Investigations, Vol 2, Part 1,
Tbingen 1980, page 76 770 "Every

fact is individual , ie temporally determined. " -. Edmund Husserl, Logical Investigations, Vol
2, Part 1, Tbingen 1980, page 119 771 The most fundamental

difference is between ' the real 'and' ideal em '. 772 "

Science Liche knowledge as such knowledge from the bottom , so explanation or Justification
. " -. Edmund Husserl, Logical Investigations, Vol 2, Part 1, Tbingen 1980, page 231 773
"essentials

unity of truth en a science is the unit of explanation. " -. Edmund Husserl, Logical
Investigations, Vol 2, Part 1, Tbingen 1980, page 233 774

nomological e Science s own in the law that some de principle and fundamental research
goal. 775 The

confusion of terms has always been a barrier for a knowledge progress . 776 " It follows,
however, that an 'isolated'

thing , strictly speaking, does not exist. Only preferably consideration, striking, stronger
dependencies and non-compliance less noticeable, weaker dependencies allowed us a first
preliminary investigation, the fiction of isolated things. On the same gradual difference e of
dependencies beruth also the contrast of the world and I . A ' isolated it 'I there is no more
than an isolated thing.' thing 'and' I 'are provisional fictions of the same kind. " - Ernst Mach
, Knowledge and Error, Darmstadt 1991, p 15 777 "The

nature of research is similar to the unraveling complicated intertwined strands where

serendipity is almost as important as skill and sharp observation of the researcher's work is
just as exciting. as for the hunter tracking a little-known Wilde under disturbing
circumstances. " - Ernst Mach, Knowledge and Error, Darmstadt 1991, p 17 778 "The

thinking is not concerned with the thing s, as they are in themselves, but with our thoughts
notions ( concepts ) of same. " - Ernst Mach, Knowledge and Error, Darmstadt 1991, p 142
779 "The adaptation of
thought to the fact we call observation , the adaptation of thought to each other but as a
theory . " - Ernst Mach, Knowledge and Error, Darmstadt 1991, p 164 780 "Each
fragmentation of

Aufmerksankeit , any penalty on by too many , is felt uncomfortable, even if no contradictions

are no longer present ... The. economizing , harmonizing , organizing the thoughts which we
as a biologically it need feel, goes far beyond the requirement of logical addition, en-
contradiction. " - Ernst Mach, Knowledge and Error, Darmstadt 1991, p 176 781 non-

identical bar such as 'red' and 'green' . 782 "Each physical application of mathematics beruth
to the attention of the

analogy between natural facts and arithmetic operation s. " - Ernst Mach, Knowledge and
Error, Darmstadt 1991, p 222 783 "If an

object of contemplation M the characteristics a, b, c and having another object N with the
former in the characteristics a, b, c coincide , so we are very inclined to expect that the latter
also have the characteristics of d e, will coincide with M in this., this expectation is logically
not justified. " - Ernst Mach, Knowledge and Error, Darmstadt 1991, p 225 784 "

drawn by similarity and analogy are, strictly speaking, not an object of logic , at least not
formal logic, but only of psychology . "- Ernst Mach, Knowledge and Error, Darmstadt 1991,
p 225 785 "In addition to the elements, which for the representation of

facts , includes, from which a hypothesis is drawn, are essential the same always, or do you
usually have other that 'not necessary' are to this representation. Because the hypothesis after
a analogy formed, their similarity s and differential points are incompletely known, since
nothing else would be to explore it. "- Ernst Mach, Knowledge and Error, Darmstadt, 1991,
page 245

786 ' cause we call an event, to which another (the effect) is invariably tied. course, shows
that this ratio is usually interpreted very superficial and incomplete. Usually only two
particularly striking components of a process to be construed as cause and effect. However,
the detailed analysis of such a process then shows almost always, that the so-called cause
only a complement of a full set of circumstances is that determines the so-called effect.
reason, also, depending on whether one has met or overlook this or that part of the complex,
Konplement the question very differently. " - Ernst Mach, Knowledge and Error, Darmstadt
1991, p 277 787 "A full adaptation to each

individual s occurring in the future, unpredictable e fact . course, is impossible, the multiple,
possible general e applicability of natural law e on concrete actual cases is only possible, by
abstraction , by simplification, schematization, idealization of the facts by mentally e
decomposition can be the same in such simple elements that the given facts with more
sufficiently accurate to build from these again mentally and composed. Such elementary
idealized fact elements as in the reality are never encountered in perfection, are the uniform
and uniformly accelerated mass movement, the stationary (steady) thermal and electrical
flow etc. " - Ernst Mach, Knowledge and Error, Darmstadt 1991, p 455 788 For
Mach , the incommensurability of is physical and the psychological . prejudice 789 "Without
the

periodical return would be knowledge impossible, since we have nothing on our previous
experience . could relate en Also would be without a certain regularity of the periodical
return any measurement impossible. " - Alfred North Whitehead, Science and the Modern
World, Ffm, 1988, page 45 790 "An unsolved problem of

thinking s: How can you explain that given matter configurations, which according to
physical law move s in space, live de organisms form? " - Alfred North Whitehead, Science
and the Modern World, Ffm, 1988, page 55 791 The confusion of the

abstract en with the concreteness en Whitehead called the "fallacy of misplaced

concreteness". - Alfred North Whitehead, Science and the Modern World, Ffm, 1988, page 66
792 The most important feature of the

mathematical s mind , it is the ability to use abstraction to work en. 793 "We can not without

abstraction s thinking and it is therefore of utmost importance to examine our ways of

abstraction very carefully. " - Alfred North Whitehead, Science and the Modern World, Ffm,
1988, page 75 794 "The

living cell is de for biology, what are the electron and proton physics. " - Alfred North
Whitehead, Science and the Modern World, Ffm, 1988, page 121 795 "The doctrine of

energy refers to the idea that all change in a quantitatively e resistance is based. " - Alfred
North Whitehead, Science and the Modern World, Ffm, 1988, page 122 796 All electrons are
each very

similar . With our observation we can smglichkeiten but no differences . determine 797

Ideal typical abstraction s are utopian . constructions e 798

fact n without heart and mind are the epitome of brutal . factuality s 799 "Something

recognize always say: something as categorical cases it material before him have. " - Emil
Lask ., Collected Works Vol 3, Tbingen 1924, page 143 800 "

recognition is not recognizing and Experience . " -. Emil Lask, Collected Works Vol 3,
Tbingen 1924, page 194 801 "So ultimately, by

quantification , the vi only repel, mitigate, but never eliminate . " -. Emil Lask, Collected
Works Vol 3, Tbingen 1924, page 246 802 The

generalization is coping smittel. 803 "The

Direct is a continuous and indivisible it. " -. Emil Lask, Collected Works Vol 3, Tbingen
1924, page 291 804 "No one can - even with the best

law eser knowledgeable - the way a drop of water in Niagara Falls calculate / predict,
because the exact knowledge of the initial, boundary and system data missing, or will remain
beyond the complexity of a. politically - economically - social en system .'s like to be
comparable " - Hans Lenk, pragmatic reason, Stuttgart 1979, pages 128 805 "The

grammar is autonomous and not really responsible. " - Friedrich Waismann , logic, language,
philosophy, Stuttgart 1985, page 77 806 "Let us first of all clear that the word '

equal 'does not have' a 'meaning, but many, if I know about when two! room to stretch are the
same, so it is not yet apparent, when two time lines are equal In fact, I must in this case make
a new determination,.., the word 'is' is used in both cases according to various rules and
therefore has a different meaning Considering Furthermore, if one of the same dimensions
speaks of equal temperatures of the same temperatures, it can be seen that the meaning of this
word, far from it, the same to be in each of these cases must be explained again. " - Friedrich
Waismann, logic, language, philosophy, Stuttgart 1985, page 54f 807 Each

determination is arbitrary . 808

law e can postulated to be, but not justified . 809 "The

logic is before the 'how', not in front of the 'What'. " - Ludwig Wittgenstein in Friedrich
Waismann, logic, language, philosophy, Stuttgart 1985, page 111 810 "Omnis

negatio est determinatio . " - Baruch Spinoza in Friedrich Waismann, logic, language,
philosophy, Stuttgart 1985, page 131 811 "So what is a size Something that is?

measure can This would give one? circle , because the concept of measuring pres

oses the number. " - Friedrich Waismann, logic, language, philosophy,

Stuttgart 1985, page 240 812 All

definitions are en use sdefinitionen. 813 "We are not into temptation, in the

meaning of a word is a subject to see or a kind of atmosphere to the word floats ,

and in understanding detecting this atmosphere. " - Friedrich Waismann, logic,
language, philosophy, Stuttgart 1985, page 344 814 is misleading often the form
of a

question . 815

definition . s can be used, strictly speaking, only in a very specific situation 816
"The construction of the

reality of solid elements seems Thus the condition for their descriptiveness to be.
Were it otherwise would in fact not constant, always recur can find the elements,
so would the possibility of expressing and describing stop. " - Friedrich
Waismann, logic, language, philosophy, Stuttgart 1985, page 450 817 The

relation s in reality are countless and no language is capable of all shades . meet
818 "We would as readily as from a

consciousness of 'Blue' or the 'Cold' from a consciousness of 'And', the 'If', the
'but' and 'through' talk. " - Friedrich Waismann, logic, language, philosophy,
Stuttgart 1985, page 515 819 "The

question is the first, tentative Schrit of mind it on his walk that leads to new
horizons The Great. spirit is the great questioner . " - Friedrich Waismann, logic,
language, philosophy, Stuttgart 1985, page 595 820 "A

question is apparently of the nature or the structure of reality , while only by the
fog is caused, of our terms is. " - Friedrich Waismann, logic, language,
philosophy, Stuttgart 1985, page 611 821 "The

law thus goes beyond the observation also en: it claims that it also for the not yet
is perceived cases. " - Friedrich Waismann, logic, language, philosophy, Stuttgart
1985, page 613 822 "There is a

natural law infinitely many consequences that may result, so is the ideal of a
complete verification of reach. " - Friedrich Waismann, logic, language,
philosophy, Stuttgart 1985, page 627 823 "The much-vaunted

dialectic is a classic example of those empty phrases that will help you everything
and the opposite of everything " prove "or" justify "can." - Ernst Topitsch ,
knowledge and Jllusion, Hamburg 1979, page 34 824 "all

count , ultimately going to count a time series of guest experience sen back. " -
Rudolf Carnap , Physical concept formation, Darmstadt 1966, page 15 825 The

quality of the sensation remains unexplained , as one might do it too. 826 '

Explains 'is only a means-end -Zusammenhang. All knowledge is mere description

. 827 "Is it also madness, yet there is method." - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe,
Faust 828 We know most 'like' things will

change , but not why . (Why does water at 4 Celsius its greatest density?) 829 One
can not say that two tones

equal to a third are; they can not add. 830 "Take from the concept of

body s the expansion, the strength and the shape away and there is nothing left to
stay. " -. George Berkeley, Works, ed Frazer, London, 1871, Bd.III, de motu, 29
831 "But just because we

feel have that there exists a chain in which we run the risk of losing ourselves, we
simplify ., we abstract from all conditions , so far as they may be, in favor of one
that we have emphasized the intention. " - Emile Meyerson, Identity and Reality,
Leipzig 1930, page 37 832 All

property s the thing s are always certain conditions thought along such as
temperature, consistency, etc.. 833 An

object is nothing more than a group of phenomena and properties. 834 Since we
are only in the

time , successively, watch runs can, so in reality the empirical e law to a law of
succession of phenomena beyond. 835 "If sometimes the

appearance is as if we formulated the law of e directly on the reality applicable ,

so beruth exclusively on the coarseness of our senses and on the imperfection of
our means of investigation does not allow us all the subtle differences between the
various phenomena to perceive . " - Emile Meyerson, Identity and Reality, Leipzig
1930, page 20 836 "The

law is an ideal e construction , which does not express what really happens, but
what happened 'would', if certain conditions were met. " - Emile Meyerson,
Identity and Reality, Leipzig 1930, page 21 837 Contrary to the view that

science should try to "an objectively e reality "to describe behind the phenomena,
represented Mach the view that science only an economic e description of the
relationships between the phenomena goal have. 838 There is no other method
that

socially e reality to study, as from the standpoint of human Ideal e. 839 Without

questions there are no answers, and the answers are influenced by the formulation
of our questions. The questions bring our interest in the subject expressed. These
interests can never be purely scientifically it be natural. 840 "The naive

empiricism attempts the impossible: the reality to observe , without preconceived

opinions , to be subordinated to the substance of self and scientific law . gives
birth e This is one course of illusion out the one only by an appearance of
objectivity is that one which nevertheless present a priori ideas tries to conceal
carefully, without such we would of course disagree " results come "". - Gunnar
Myrdal, The Value Problem in the Social Sciences, Bonn-Bad Godesberg in 1975,
page 232 841 "

facts do not turn suddenly in terms and theory n; outside the system s of concepts
and theories, there is no scientific en facts, only chaos. An indispensable priori
element is found in all scientific work It must be. questions ask before you can
answer them all questions are an expression of our. interest s of the world, they
are basically rating . guest ratings are therefore necessary in the thoughts
building with enclosed when we consider the reality observed and advance the
theoretical analysis, they form more than the scaffolding when we made facts
ratings and politically deriving claims e ". - Gunnar Myrdal, Objectivity in Social
Research, Ffm 1971, Preface to the English edition, page IXf 842 "The common

terminology is already ideologically , and such terminological shortcomings point

to deeper methodological error. " - Gunnar Myrdal, Objectivity in Social
Research, Ffm 1971, page 49 843 Jahrhundertelaag it was

tradition that the scientific en methods underlying rating . en 844 "As for the
natural

science is concerned, it is now geared to calculate the fault that the observer into
the phenomenon was introduced. The direction of the pure object remains
unshaken., the subject is, wherever one looks in the Western world, on the retreat.
This is the logical consequence of an e structure , all the conditions in their
objectifying process absorbed. Absorbent unit and power is the conceptual e
thinking . The urge all the facts of consciousness to objectify s is an ever-
increasing expansion conceptually he construction en. " - William S. Haas,
Western and Eastern thought, Reinbek 1966, page 145 845 natural

scientific e phrases related to ' solid body at all ', to the' bacterial cell at all . ' 846
A

relationship is structurally . 847 The

live -ended feeling always occurs behind the abstract e apprehension back. 848

backup stendenzen the methods thinker s. 849 What

quality is must subjectively be. 850 What is urgently needed humanity, is a

theory of change s. 851 All our

knowledge is comparatively end classification . 852

thinking is the relationship between subject and object bound. 853

knowledge is something that ' is true ', not something that' is '. 854

measurement is always in space and time .

Download the page with the comments

Note: For not n ago marked passages are passages that appear more or
less the same sense in different sources, such as is not clear who copied
 from whom.

Reason Immanuel Kant - Critique of Pure Reason

see also mind , mind , thinking , irrationality , emotion , logic , theory , knowledge , truth ,
faith

001 "We explained in the first part of our transcendental logic, the mind by the faculty of
rules, here we distinguish the same reason of the fact that we will call the faculty of
principles." - Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, Riga 1781, page 300

002 "Reason is language , at which Mark bone I gnaw and I will nibble to death about it. "
003 Reason of the Enlightenment replaced the

belief . 004 reason and rationality are by no means identical. 005 The reason falls curbing the

passion en about. 006 "In their innermost interior is

Kant 's moral philosophy expression for the proud confidence of the rationalism of the natural
reason of man as an original and eternal power , which is independent of all tradition, history,
authority and state sgewalt. Among a form of government, which the individual as such
refused any external power and all influence, claiming the individual with greater pathos
killed as the inviolable right of reason, independent of all factuality and all institution ,
confidently the truth be determined and Valid. Despite all the positive power distribution,
regardless of the bonds millennial habits, regardless of all conventionality, formation and
change, the reason asserted as a sovereign ruler in his own kingdom, a kingdom that is not of
this world. Rationalism is the judgment of the individual over the world and according to
political circumstances, it is understandable that this judgment is essentially a critique of the
status quo in the name of equality , freedom and humanity was. " - Alf Ross, criticism of the
so-called practical knowledge, Copenhagen and Leipzig, 1933, page 395f

007 The reason is never definitive, because the irrational can never be excluded. 008 The

evil is a ruse of reason. 009 The reason is aware of its

limits conscious. 010 the Un

moral one occasion reason (to occasional rationality) 011 The rational is always open to

criticism . 012 is Reasonable, what most people

agree are, reasonable having nothing with reason, but with compliance . doing 013 reason and

reality are nothing more than general he consensus . 014 The

generality usurps the right of dominion over the mind lots and irrational at. 015

Justification s are ultimately decision s. 016

predictability is the criterion of rationality. 017 Reason is one of the

ideologically most words in our mind It-world. 018 controlled

folly of Don Juan

019 There are no universal truth , no universal e rationality and no universal e reality . 020
The

hubris of pure rationality as a ratio fascism

021 Rational is synonymous with realistic . 022 Rationalism is the idea that it

generally s standards for thinking and action are. 023 rationality is nothing than one

theory among others . 024 The end point of rational discussion is by

standards , criteria, purpose and set goals. 025 Rational

thinking is for the sole justification s purposes . 026 The

nature is not reasonable . 027 Reason is the highest

authority . 028 needs a reason

emotional e basis. 029 "The Windelbandsche 'principle of consistency' means to him that
everything

Examine and Consider evidence or refutation would be futile if a reasonable not mind a
normative en compulsion would recognize that, for example, set the sequence to its merits or
about with the result and the reason is repealed. " 030 reason as the epitome of

freedom from domination of thinking s. 031 Reason goes in contrast to reason about the

knowledge s limit also. 032 Reason is the faculty that

unit creates and connect all searches . 033 There is no opposition between

freedom and reason. 034 Reasonable is what

appropriate is. 035

conflict between passion and reason. 036 The reason is a

devil sbraut and the highest whore who has hell. 037 Where to
self-control is missing , the reason is not capable of the will to govern. 038 Reason

deceives us, the conscience never deceives us. 039

spirit and reason are fictitious syntheses and unit s. 040

freedom can be no reason nor think as reason without freedom. 041 Who rationalized,

disguised , he not true wants. 042 Rationalism is

making going on, the mysticism aimlessly. 043

feeling e regarded as an exemplary manner for instability , unpredictability and

inconsistency . 044 The

faith calls his knowledge against reason. 045 Where reason and

logic cease our begins unconsciously it. 046 It is the

interest of reason solidified opposites cancel. 047 Reason must in order to enhance the

knowledge to be understood that the limits and contradictions of the merely rational thinking
eliminates s. 048

freedom is the most important category of reason . 049 The reason comprehends the

identity of opposites . 050 Reason enjoins the observance of

peace s. 051 Pure reason leads us into

confusion . 052 The basis of reason is called

morality . 053 reasonableness is often on

expediency reduced. 054

values are not properties of things . 055 The reason consists of

disunion through the mind contrary. 056 The reason is on the

whole directed, while the mind with the individuals concerned. 057 The loss of

moral en freedom draws the loss of reason by itself. 058

Battle of the rationally moral en with the merely sensual s as basic conception of morality.
059 solid that has become

opposites repeal is the only interest of reason. 060 reason thinks the same time the
desire to reason. 061 There are a

variety passu he values whose claims another contradict and their conflict by human reason
not solved can be. 062 The reason is to be able to the

supernatural to capture. 063 "The reason is the slave of

passion en. " 064 The rationalist

believes in truth and reason. 065 reason and

feeling fight often a fatal s fight. 066 "Man has no" reason "and also no idea of such that the

General , the Abstract e, the supernatural, the ideas , without any mediation of se and
perception could recognize. " 067

fight between emotion and reason 068

emotions can not be readily called unreasonable. 069

virtue and reason, of which the noble activities come from, not based on the possession of
power . 070 The

passions know no obedience and not listen to the voice of reason. 071 " The

man is rationally capable and sanity duty strength. " 072 The reason determines the

limits of reason. 073 reason is the

ethical e or socially e use we make of our minds and our intelligence. 074 The reason is
concerned with the

whole , the mind with the individual . 075

ambivalence to endure is the job of reason. 076 "Without

abstraction would be neither reason nor language . " 077 The

power of reason is against the power of violence . 078

sensuality and intellect are the two basic forms of human knowledge . 079 " It is the

law in my mind , the good commands, and the law in my members, this command acts
contrary . " 080 The worship of the

Goddess of Reason was the culmination of the Enlightenment. 081 The reason is rather the

limitation of the mind, as to its extension. 082 the

ideal of pure en reason. 083 The reason mediates between

want and If . 084

rule of reason over passion s. 085 "

life can not before the judgment seat will be brought to reason. " 086 Where the

authority s fall You need to be on his own exit reason. 087 "The rational is the road where
everyone goes and where no one stands out." 088 It is only reasonable that

freedom a reality to make. 089 application not by

violence , but by insight and reasons . 090 The reason is its own

law to be. 091 At the level of reason, there is a

coincidence of opposites . 092 "The

right to accept anything that I'm not one before as reasonable, is the supreme law of the
subject s. " 093 The

broad masses not spoken to by an appeal to reason, but by exciting the imagination. 094
Reason teaches us reluctant

impulses to coordinate with each other. 095 The reason acts on the

will . 096 The basis of good lies in reason, of the

evil in the disposition . 097 The

freedom of the will s is for Kant a postulate of practical reason s. 098 reason based on

value of knowledge, not how the mind on the cause he knowledge . 099 "A

will is reasonable if he only wants what he can do. " 100 Reason is

linguistically related. 101 Reason is the

thinking that goes beyond the mind. 102 education means to awaken insight. 103 Natural

laws are created by the mind, the freedom of reason. 104 since

Hume have Many logic he is concerned with the induction (inference from individuals on
General) and with the question of whether they can be justified logically, if we only believe or
whether we 'reason' to believe. 105 of the
dualism of sensibility and intellect. 106 The

judgment skraft is the middle term between understanding and reason. 107 "The

law environment by natural concepts is done by the mind, and is theoretically . The legislation
by the freedom sbegriff happens by reason, and is merely practical . " 108 "The

common sense , which you, as only healthy (not yet cultivated) mind, look for the least of
which is only getting from that which the name of a person makes claim, may face the risk
hence the offensive honor with the name of the common sense (sensus communis) has to be
substantiated; in such a way that by the word 'common' (not just in our language, which really
contains therein an ambiguity, but also in many others) so much as the vulgar, which can be
found everywhere, understands that to have absolutely no merit or preference is. " 109 "The
reason is in their extreme demands on

the unconditioned ; since, however, the mind you always, available only under a certain
condition that must be given to services. " 110 The

objective e reality of the pure conceptions of the understanding is in question. 111 last resort,
can the

political e action justify not rational, realized it rather a decision between competing the value
of proper s and faith smchten which dispense with compelling arguments and remain a
binding discussion inaccessible. 112 The rational and the Balanced is of higher quality
maintained as the

Irrational e and voltage Full. 113 In the spirit of rationalism which was

the world , the life , people 'more geometrico', ie describe in universally comparable sizes.
The Measurable e takes the place of the ' occult en 'qualities, the general e the place of the
distinctive Custom s, the principles take the place of concrete life. 114

value judgment e are not letztbegrndbar . 115 The

purpose rational action is to expectations oriented. 116 "The specific

interest of rational capitalist en ' operation is' active 'rational' order s, which practically it
functioning like a machine can be calculated. " 117 Rationalism sees the

world as a necessary and coherently . 118 "The

crisis of reason is a crisis of value system s and its validity and enforceability , a crisis of
meaningful for humanity objectives and in particular a consequence of the lack of
enforcement power of human en, morally en and liberal conviction s. " 119 the

ideal e of reason and rationality 120 "The

judgment s power is the middle term between understanding and reason. " 121 The reason
relates to the
His-Shall . 122 "The

morally e law is a formal rationality condition the use of our freedom . " 123 "Reason is a

practically it, di assets as assets the free use of our causality through ideas to define (pure
concepts of reason), contains not only the morally s law s a regulative principle of our action
s, but are well characterized at the same time a subjective-constitutive, in the terms of an
object at hand, which can only think of reason, and which should really be done by our
actions in the world according to that law. ... So we are a priori bestimt through reason, the
worlds best, which consists in the connection of the greatest good of the rational world beings
with the highest condition of good to the same, that is, the general happiness with
gesetzmigsten morality to carry every effort . " 124 Reason is much

desire to reason. 125 insight inspectio = 126 "

Got a vernnfticheit. " 127 "The

man is what he is, by reason. " 128 "The

morally e power is precisely that, from the nature not force to leave, but to the rational subject
. " 129 The reason is a

value . 130 reasoning and

beweistmeln

131 The fact that man is endowed with reason and imagination, leads to the need of the
identity with itself. 132 "The

desire is for themselves beyond measure , and only by the idea comes measure into them. "
133 One must make a distinction between what the reason

incomprehensible is and what their contrary. 134 Reason as a synthesis of

opposites . 135 "

critique of language understands human reason and human language as one and the same
phenomenon. "

Note: The unspecified passages are passages that appear in various sources more or less the
same sense, so that it is not clear who copied from whom.

Theory

see also thinking , generality , abstraction , practice , method , objectivity

001 The simplest observation is thinking style related. 002 "The

hostility against the Theoretical ... depends in truth against the changing activity , with the
critical s thinking is connected. ... The vast majority of the governed is the unconscious fear in
way, theoretical thinking could laboriously accomplished adaptation to the reality can be as
wrong and superfluous appear ". 003 The

Mysticism is the belief that all teaching content in the soul is born. 004 "between theory and

practice is ansich intimate connection and relationship; those is related to this as the General
to particular how the rule to apply them, as the means to his purpose . " - 3 Paul Johann
Anselm Feuerbach's view, German Law, Munich 1810, page

005 practice are and theory only relative terms , the inter- overflow and no real contrast
display. 006 "The explanatory power of theories based solely on the principle of identity at the
time that they want to bring to bear." 007 "It is the next and most important, in a sense task of
our conscious knowledge of nature that she Empower us, future experiences to anticipate in
order to set up our present actions under this foresight can ... However, this method, which we
always use us to derive the sought probability is this: we make our inner

glow images or symbols of external objects and although we make of such a nature that the
thinking necessary consequences of the images always back the pictures are of the nature
necessary consequences of the objects shown ... Is it even succeeded us, from the accumulated
experience to date images required by the derive texture, so we can develop the effects on
them, as on models in a short time, which will occur in the outer world until some time or as
consequences of our own intervention ... The images of which we speak, our ideas of things;
they have with the things that a substantial agreement, which is the fulfillment of the
requirement mentioned, but it is not necessary for its purpose, that it any further
correspondence have with things. In fact we do not know and have no means to know whether
our ideas with those in anything else of the things match , as alone in just that one
fundamental relationship. "- - Heinrich Hertz in Hans-Ludwig Ollig, materials the neo-
Kantian discussion, Darmstadt 1987, p 266

008 "The theoretical work, I convince myself every day, brings about more in the world than
practical; is the realm of imagination revolutionized, so reality can not support ". 009

terms have their meaning only in the context of a theory. 010

dogmatism is theoretical incapacity and morally he lack. 011 The cycle of

idea - in the spirit of persevering. 012 There are insuperable

objections against any kind of generalization of the theory. 013

Secured e theory versus unverified faith

014 The systematics of theory tries again and again thinking of producing fabric that under
the conditions of a deliberate stand effect. 015 Any theory is only an

analogy to reality . 016 " A new

scientific truth cares not enforce in such a way that their opponents believe will and explain as
instructed, but rather the fact that the opponents gradually die out and that the growing
generation is made from the outset familiar with the truth. " 017 "after Duhem does not
describe a set of physics what is the content of direct observation, not a judgment of physics
refers to those elements in the phenomenological physics Mach the core and the content of all

reality represent. Not only the general, but already the particular physical statements can not
be explained adequately by Mach system. A judgment about facts can be - as Duhem shows
again and again - not separate from the above principles. Because there is no factual finding
that is not already includes a basic assertion. Every judgment regarding a case already
includes a an entire system of physics. There is no observation and measurement before all
theory and regardless of their requirements. No matter how simple physical set can be written
as a sum of perception consider statsachen - as Mach wanted -, can be understood as an
aggregate of observations. So is not communicated to us by the physicist of trying to read the
meters of this or that sensation has appeared in the Observer, but that an electric current of
certain intensity is passed through a magnetic field, the pressure, the volume, the temperature
of a gas under certain experimental conditions in this or that manner changed. But in order to
understand the meaning of such statements about power, pressure, volume, etc., this is not
part of the reference to perception data. Because even the use of these terms includes a highly
complex theoretical conditions, so that a whole system of physical judgments is included in it.
What appeals to the physicist as a result of the experiments is not a report on individual facts
which he has constructed; it is rather the interpretation of these facts, ie the displacement
thereof in an ideal , abstract , symbolic world. We could therefore concludes Cassirer, never
the truth or falsehood of a theory determine areas that we in the world of facts as one for
himself given, independent of all conditions of the theory actually measure . A physical theory
could be measured only in other theories, a physical system leave if we are to determine its
truth value, always compared only to another system, with a whole complex of theoretical
principles and tenets. " - Kurt Hbner, Cassirer's contribution to philosophy physics in Hans-
Ludwig Ollig, materials for neo-Kantian discussion, Darmstadt 1987, page 267

018 organization is the combination of theory and practice . 019 "sense-data are
psychologically speaking the result of our belief in the existence of certain theoretical
entities." 020 Nothing is in the

intellect , which is not previously in the senses was. 021

facts exist only as applications of theories. 022 The theoretical

unification is just about the abstraction to win. 023 The

opposition of 'theory' and ' practice 'is on the bottom of the value freedom the facts grown and
now obsolete. 024
philosophy is primarily theory of knowledge. 025 "

God is the lack of theory replacing term . " 026

Abstract means theoretical. 027 for the

traditional theory, the validity of which was general terms by the hypothesis of equality of
term and real entity by means of the reification of the concept and the rationalization of
Thingness supported. 028 In the classical

distinctions was "theoretically", which refers to cause and effect related, " practical ",
however, was in terms of means and ends . 029 "

facts are transformed not unexpectedly in terms and theories; outside the system s of terms
and theories, there are no scientific facts, only the chaos . An indispensable priori element is
found in all scientifically s work . One must ask questions before you can answer it. All
questions are an expression of our interest in the world; they are basically votes . Ratings are
therefore necessary in the edifice included, if the reality we observe and promote the
theoretical analysis; they form more than the scaffolding when we Ratings and facts from
political deriving claims. " 030 theories as

systematization of facts and systematization of systematization. 031 "The

word is the shadow of the deed . " 032 theory as

orientation srahmen and sense gebungsgefge. 033 The

semiotics is not only a theory, but a constant practice . 034

terms are theory- impregnated . 035 We have a

need by relating the knowledge . 036

thought systems are always round and finished, which is the starting point once accepted,
which is prayer wheel again and again by new going on. 037 The theory proves itself on its

usefulness . 038 The pursuit of theory is a quest for

unity behind the translucent ble complexity . 039 The

method of the theorist brings with it, that he as a foundation general conditions, so-called.
principles need from which he conclusions can be deduced. 040 The

sensual s data depend on the theories from, with whom they interpreted to be. 041 "

Ideas are not knowledge concepts, they do not fall into the field of theoretical, they belong to
the realm of practical en reason . " 042 A theory tries the

relationships between random and thinking to enable. 043

Ethical e knowledge is never mere theory. 044 An

observation gets only their value as they pass a theory explains and is explained. 045 Theory
and

practice are not separated en factors, but with each other in interaction . 046 "If the

language really, would correspond to the logic of the world. " 047 Each

fact depends on theoretical assumptions with guidance from. 048 All theories have a tendency
to be

close . 049 The

interest alone gives the knowledge importance . 050 A change in the

language is our view reshape the cosmos. 051 the

reality of measurable hold, ie calculability of all the facts. 052 "We do not represent

completed teaching and also never represented . " 053 A theory must always

understand his, the distinguishes them from the faith slehre. 054 If a theory is only once
explained, it is already in

terms aggregate corpse . 055 How can we avoid that the theorist their

intellectual superiority take advantage ? 056 "Nothing is

more practical than a good theory. " 057 "Without

revolutionary theory e it may also not be a revolutionary movement. " 058 One theory is the

summary of observations under the principle of Think economics . 059 The

classification as homogenization s method is more theoretical than the practical en conquest

of reality . 060

interest is the objectivity of knowledge opacifying moment. 061 The

logic as a theory of thinking s all too easy as the doctrine of the reality perceived . 062

matters of existence are never merely theoretical. 063 The

distinction of subject and object disappears and the theory and practice . 064 A theory is
looking for

general s law regularities. 065

ideology as a sham theory and as spurious theory. 066 Each theoretical

conviction has ethically s character. 067 Theory and

practice are not to each other separated . 068 "We do not theoretical, but a

democratically- e solution. " 069 True theory is

practice . 070 The interesting thing about the theories is always more or less

speculative e piece that their unit completes . 071 The primary site of the theory of

reality is the problem of subjectivity . 072 The ways of the

pure theory bring us nowhere . 073 The transition from planning to

action . 074 The theorist tends rather to the

general , while extending practitioners mainly the particular turns. 075 finished,

detached thinker results. 076 theory

recognizes - practice . recognizes 077 A theory that would be broad enough to include the fact
of their own existence with, would an

infinite regress mean. 078

other talk than you think . 079 "The

self-government is an education for revolution and a revolution in education. " 080 Theoria as
a

show of phenomena . 081 Every theory is a schematic

image of reality and is based on the technology , the relevant features selected , and others for
the respective school of thought simplify or ignore. 082

conceptualization as a creation of thought forms. 083 The theorist rated everything from

yes-no -Standpunkt out, everything is approval or rejection . 084 theories maintain the

claim to act the whole thing to dominate . 085 The theoretical

thinking leads 're constantly in the astray . One is inclined, the thinking work already for the
reality to keep . 086 Each theory is to be

authoritarian . 087 Dealing with theory is a

privilege . 088 Only the theory

decides what we watch can. 089 There is no

abyss between the thoughts and the fact . The Conception already contains the beginning of
the act . 090 The

relativism means giving up scientific e Justification final opinions , not waiver of the opinion
itself. 091 The

solution of theoretical opposites is only practically possible e way. 092 All

human Liche activity takes place either in the thinking or in actions instead. 093 A theory can
only ever by a different theory

refuted are, but not in practice. practice is indeed the treatment of individual cases , however,
the theory provides general rules on. 094 "The supposedly possible

contrast between theory and practice runs on the banal set out: it is possible that something at
first glance to be relatively general e usually evident to that but this theory at critical he,
testing as a reason of individual cases here, as untenable doctrine turns out to e itself. " 095
From

practical effectiveness is not on the theoretical accuracy close . 096 Every theory has

generally s character. 097 The concept of the

interest by prevailing theory is incompatible with the ideal of an objective en science . 098
"The

experimental e dialogue with nature , the modern Science discovered beruth less on passive he
observation rather than on ' practical activity he '. It depends on the physical reality to
manipulate , so they to 'stage', to correspond as closely as possible a theoretical description.
The phenomenon under study has dissected and isolated , until it a ' ideal situation 'comes
close, which may be physically inaccessible, but the assumed conceptual s schema. " 099

perceptions are not true , but accepted . 100 Each theory is

selectively by certain aspects of reality lifted, others are left in the background, however. 101
The

psychology is a legitimation stheorie. 102 "Each

description implies a decision on the meter , a decision on the question we want to ask. In this
sense, gives us the answer, the result of the measurement, no access to a given reality . We
have to decide what kind of measurement we want to perform and we provide the kind of
question to the system. According to the classical view is the only ' objective 'description in
the full' of Sstems, as it is', regardless of the decision, in what way observed. Bohr has always
stressed that the 'positive' decision that the measurement in the quantum mechanics is
introduced, something new had. The physicist has to decide which language, which
macroscopic measuring instrument he chooses. Bohr expressed this thought by the
Komlementarittsprinzip that as an extension of Heisenberg 's uncertainty relation can be
considered. We can coordinate or stimulus measure , but not both. A single theoretical
language which the variables to which a well-defined value can be attributed, linked together,
can the contents of a physical system to drain them. " 103 theory is the result of the

generalization of single observation . 104

Anarchist s practice is the destruction of theory . 105 Kant, Hegel, Peirce, Husserl, and
Adorno, among others "have yielded different starting points to demonstrate that it

suddenly there knowledge is not. The search for the original experience of an evident
immediacy is futile. Even the simplest perception is not only due to the physiological
equipment categorical pre-formed - it is by prior experience, by handed down just as
determined and learned how through Anticipated through the horizon of expectations , even
the dreams and fears . " 106 "Each

observation is always already an interpretation made in the light of experience and acquired
knowledge s. We can facts only in the light of theories interpret and determine. " 107

observation s concepts are not only loaded in theory, but entirely theoretical. All terms are
basically theoretical concepts , even whole theories. 108 There is a

contrast of everyday s understood and theoretical thinking . 109

incommensurable theories have no logical en relationships between their sets. 110 theories are

general statements. 111 The

everyday s language can with scientifically hardly be reconciled s theories. This is also the
reason for the so-called. incomprehensibility of the theories . 112 All

concepts and theories with which we Natu are describing r only limited validity . 113 We had
the

world in theory destroy before we even in the practice could destroy. 114 for

anarchism , there are no theoretical problems , but only practical e. 115 theories are

thought systems . 116

Ideal types are not concepts , but rather provide theories. 117 theoretical

explanations based on law regularities. 118

ideology is pseudo- theory. 119

observation sdaten are theory-impregnated. 120 Any theory moves between a maximum

generality and a minimum degree of abstraction . 121 Every closed

system is a self-deception . 122 The form and the theory of a

question is already sprung a theory. 123 "Who proceeds from the theory that the

forms of thinking s (the words) with the "forms" of existence are identical, "faces then forced
in any way a" generally it " consciousness to accept, whose thoughts and ways of thinking just
the forms and laws of reality should be the human- subjectively en consciousnesses usually
considered less perfect individuations public awareness are accepted. " 124 durchdenkbare
theorems and

not durchdenkbar e mythologems 125 The world of a

organism is a natural e world , she is blind. The world of a theory is a social world. 126 "The

highest would be to comprehend that everything factual is already theory. " 127 von Neumann
shear proof: "Not only the

measurement is impossible, but also any reasonable e theoretical definition . " 128 The level
the

daily s experience is inseparable from the theoretical level. The transition from one level to
another is only by an irrational to accomplish en jump. 129 Each theoretical

equation contains necessary a certain abstraction from the particular , Discriminating and thus
injustice . 130

perceiving , feeling and thinking can be only on a theoretical level disconnect . 131 The

reality defies any theory. 132 "The theory is the

power , we cast to "the world "capture, - to them rationalize , explain, and dominate . " 133
Each

general e set has the character of a theory . 134 "The

science is based not on rocky ground, it is more of a swamp land, over which the bold design
of its theories rises,. them is a Pillar, whose pillars descend from above into the swamp - but
not to a natural, ' given ' reason . because not why do you stop, forcing it the pillar, because it
has encountered a solid layer: if it is hoped that they will carry the building, one decides to
provisionally satisfied with the strength of the pillar ". 135

form character of the theoretical 136 "The fact that theories are not

verifiable are is often overlooked; are from the theory deduced predictions are verified, so we
often speak of a verification of the theory. " 137 "The

way the science results of the less commonly en theories to the general. " 138 There is no '

pure ' experience , any more than it a 'pure' thinking is. 139 The
objective is the theoretical world . 140 To a

principle to lead to the triumph of a principle must be destroyed be. 141 The theory does not
begin with the

linguistically articulated thinking , but starts already in the perception of steadiness . 142 The
problem of the bridge between

knowledge and decision is that of theory and practice . 143 can over theories to

arguing over the definition s better not. 144

cognition theory is the theory of the realization of a common objective s world . 145

knowledge means for Schleiermacher the production of a state of immutability and

universality of a theory. 146 Using the

language of things can in their absence are treated. 147 Each

measure receives its physical sense always only through the interpretation , which gives it a
theory. 148 No theory explains

sensual e qualities . 149 "are each theory away already in their first sentences of all

facts and focuses on something which is issued has never and nowhere . " 150 In

virtually s life has always been the life compared to the theory, the ' right 'on his side. 151
Every theory is a

thinking economically e performance . 152 "The adaptation of

thoughts to the facts we refer to as observation , the adjustment of thoughts together as a

theory. " 153 An

experiment without theory is quite incomprehensible . 154 There is no theory that is not in

the form of statements explains. 155 "The mere

fact of the appearance is a theoretical date . " 156 "No

level is so high enough to keep the tension between intuition to overcome and theory, none so
low to make them seem superfluous . " 157 "So the theory touches as

assurance of objectivity , the objective identity of perception sbestandes. " 158 The great
physical theories

describe a world in which time and becoming irrelevant. 159 The three essential

thinking disciplines are logic (general rules), psychology (thought-forms) and epistemology .
160
cognition theory is methodology. 161 Harmless minds see through the

definition Re- lease of many scientifically he theorem not e. 162 What is urgently needed
humanity, is a theory of

change s. 163 The

Supreme , what man can achieve is the objectification of his thought world. 164 Theoretically

think means feeling free thinking. 165 The

logic is the theory of thinking s. 166 The basis of all

induction stheorien is the doctrine of the primacy of repetitions . 166 The

idea of a fool of himself whenever it from the interest is different.

Laurent Verycken - facts

Objectivity

see also reality , subject and object , value , knowledge , knowledge interest , method
, truth , rationality

001 The ideal of objectivity

002 objective consciousness forces a division of reality into two spheres, in an

inner and an outer.

003 own world of subjectivity - the common world of lenses.

004 For the State are individuals only what to them objectively recognizable is.

005 The relativism is against the objectivism and irrational rationalism .

006 Political parties must e of private interests to be free. Who works politically,
acting in its own interest only insofar as he really with the interests of those
represented by him identify and may he claimed nothing for himself, what he has
not achieved even for those who voted for him.

007 The concept of soul is no less abstract than the idea of the matter .

008 An objective system of knowledge s can not exist.

009 the cold objectivism

010 Quantum theory provides the objective reality not in substance , but in a
structure .

011 There is no objective reality .

012 No theory can something objective, ie with the nature is really opaque.

013 pure objectivity and pure subjectivity are simply mistakes.

014 space, time , objectivity and logic are ideas .

015 Problems arise only when an attempt is made subjectively e conviction in an

infallible transform s, objective standard that withstands all criticism and
unconditional obedience demands.

016 The difference between the realm of truth and the realm of appearance .

017 The state of a physical system s is not a property, but a relationship .

018 "The dialogue of lovers is now generally the pure contrast to the actual
speeches about a thing. "

019 Socrates refuses his judges any objective determination of his life.

020 hatred, anger, envy, scorn and arrogance are the obstacles to true knowledge .

021 Since the 17th century, we think the reality as something that all competent
observers equally accessible must be.

022 The concept of the interest by prevailing theory is incompatible with objective
science.

023 Objectivism avoids taking sides , when the truth is disturbing.

024 "from which the term word deduction clarifying initial deliberations of the
First section of the second main section of the Analytic of Concepts, and 13 in
the output B, it is clear that the transcendental deduction of the pure concepts of
the understanding with the demonstration of, or evidence of the right of appeal is
concerned is "so by the authority" of the "use" of the pure concepts of the
understanding in the knowledge of a particular object "clearly" is (A85, B117).
Equally clear the problem that arises with this., it is important to explain in more
sufficiently manner, by what right, ie, from which the intended logical necessity,
the pure concepts of the understanding to determine the object of knowledge are
essential, ie in each subject determination as constitutive moments when the
Konstituentien the objective validity of this provision are Kant speaks of this in the
way that he says., it is the "objective reality" (A84; B117) of the pure concepts of
the understanding in question. - This transcendental-legitimation question, the
question quid juris is to ensure that the validity sfrage. It aims to
geltungsbegrndende function of the pure conceptions of the understanding. They
were placed under its geltungsbegrndende role in the determination of an object,
this or that object, one which also always, and asked them what these
geltungsbegrndende, this the a priori concept relating to an object function arises.
" - Werner Flach, The problem of transcendental Deduction in Hans-Ludwig Ollig,
materials for neo-Kantian discussion, Darmstadt 1987, page 152f

025 The taste, the smell, the feel, the eyes are the only valid witnesses of an
objective existence .

026 "be representational means to be independent of the subject. The explanation

of such independence is only possible in an abstraction of the relation to
consciousness. The abstraction is in fact always possible and completed, but not
yet characterized as rightly stated existing. The abstraction itself must be valid.
Abstraction is called negative waiving. But abstraction for whose sake we will
only understood apart from the positives. However, since the object is now
positive, the law says that subjectivity is overcome in this respect its importance.
Just because the subject the law is, it can be thought of as the relation to the
subject transcendent. At this (! False) argument, one for close Natorp critical
thought of: The object has its validity value through the objectify de work of the
subject in the sciences. " - to Wolfgang Marx, The philosophical development Paul
Natorp in Hans-Ludwig Ollig, materials Neo-Kantianism discussion, Darmstadt
1987, page 71

027 The objective world is a mere phenomenon of the brain . The on time, space
and causality based 0rdnung is turned off in the hypnotic trance.

028 What mere idea of recognizing the subject is s, can be no objective reality .

029 "That this suit for Vest is here that I do not perceive. This sense I am enclosing
the cut and sewn in a certain way fabric. Or: The time is in the perception of
sgrundlage Uhrgestalt itself can not be read, but only pursuant to a respective
constellations of the hands insertable her mind. In short, we detect the objects in
their function, they have for us a meaning , they are us as units of meaning given
not as a sum of individual facts . Meaning whole, the reference pole of
intentionality . It is obvious to anyone that an object is not only a sense
interpretation belongs. The walking stick can sense in the situation of endangered
weapon obtained; the walnut tree in front of my house can today the importance of
fruit charms, tomorrow the protection against sun and rain, another time who of
timber or fuel. Although these various meanings have in the way things their basis
and also its limit, but can not be derived from the current perception basis. It is the
intentionality of consciousness that enables this surpassing of the pure actuality in
the dimension of meaning. " - Ludwig J. Pongratz, problem history of psychology,
Bern / Munich 1984, pages 125

030 "Who are you , if you're purely objective . "

031 The objective world of objects .

032 The concept of the good is not objective.

033 "Only then bordered to the world purely objectively, when you do not know
that you belong. "

034 The perfect objectivity, the consciousness s is the aesthetic view.

035 Only objectivity capable of artists.

036 "The favorite jewelry of truth is nakedness. "

037 The logic has the connections of concepts as such a problem .

038 genius is nothing more than the most perfect objectivity.

039 ideality all object s.

040 The lenses as such exists only in consciousness .

041 The goal of the idealism is the object without subject .

042 time, space and causality are objective forms of knowledge .

043 All lenses is imagination .

044 objectivity is through the negation of the will of s . caused

045 from the ground, there are two different perspectives : the subjective , by the
consciousness . emanates and the objective, which starts from the outside

046 . On objective ways we never get to the inner of things

047 Everything is lenses and remains only a communicable, Secondary.

048 None sensually perceptible en thing is objective reality based.

049 In the language we objectify our sensation . Linguistic symbolism leads to an

objectification of Sinneseindrcke.Im linguistic expression take our sensations
new form and enter their individual s character. They are not isolated situations
more, but be brought under term classes , with generally denoted s name.

050 The origin not objectified.

051 Objectivity

052 The existence is necessarily because they for thinking no thing is.

053 The realism is the assumption that the world out there largely independent of
our activities there.

054 The objective activity is objectified .

055 The science Liche objectivity and lack of principle have no relationship.

056 "Actually, the objective is the general - Subjectively e. "

057 'Objicere' ie throw at .

058 The highest that a man can achieve, the objectification of his is thought world.

059 What we, the objective meaning of a thing called s, is in practically he

respects its validity for a wider range of subjects .

060 The relativity undermined the objective nature and conducted a subjective one
s factor. According to relativity, there is nothing for himself.

061 The difference between objectivity and subjectivity is between reality and
illusoriness .

062 "The cornerstone of science union method is the postulate of the objectivity of
nature . "

063 The rem e, structured in objects world , arises only just the fact that we from
Subjectively s and accidental abstract .

064 lenses work assumes that the mind is category yet subject is skategorie.

065 In the science residue-free proofs are provided and contradictory sfreie
definitions are provided, at the same time claim to objectivity and elimination of
value statements .

066 "Isolated material particles are abstractions , their properties are defined only
by the interaction with other systems perceptible . "
067 "Subatomic particles are therefore not things. , but links between things, and
these things are themselves links between other things, and so on. In quantum
theory one arrived never at things on, you always have it with tissues and
interrelationships to do. "

068 The objective nature description beruth on the Cartesian distinction of mind
and matter .

069 "On the subatomic level, the interrelationships and interactions between the
parts of the whole, of more fundamental importance than the parts themselves
There is movement, but there is ultimately no moving subjects. there is activity,
but no doer; there are no dancers, but only the dance. "

070 "It is the illoyalste kind, if the facts can speak. "

071 There is no objective view of history.

072 In numbers can agree most closely. sizes can be mathematically and thus
"objectively" determine, they can not doubted to be.

073 "The subject is overwhelmed to be happy by objectively verifiable satisfaction

objectively experiencing Direction needs . In fulfillment of this program is the
objective, namely identifiable benefit to the dominant measure: performance in the
production due to power consumption in, the power consumption due to
performance in the production. Thus the totalitarian circle: The power monomania
makes the subjectivity of the subjects evaporate ".

074 Every thing is what it is and nothing else.

075 Good is an indefinable he expression, strictly speaking, not an expression is

defined .

076 The objectivist as a rationalist , the subjectivist as irrationalist .

077 One can not of the space-time going out to a theory of objective reality to
develop.

078 The truth is something objective, the certainty of something subjective .

079 mathematics seems objectively.

080 objectivity mean value freedom .

081 Without the I there are no things .

082 The thing category is an " anthropomorphic he fetishism ".

083 The form of the concept is the shape of the law , the universality , objectivity.

084 objective = reified

085 "The unrest is okay , the very fact that they object ("target ="
../../but/221149/wbdin.html _ blank "> thing) is."

086 The logical en problems of objectivity, objectivity .

087 "The thinking is thingness , or thingness thinking. "

088 "Things are absolutely useful and only after their usefulness to look at. "

089 The abolition of all objectivity in the identity of subject and object .

090 " Must namely, what not to thing can be done. "

091 "alienation means the same as thingness or objectivity . "

092 A logical consequence of the repeal of objectivity is the abolition of time .

093 The realization of labor is its objectification .

094 "The man is a non-representational it, spiritualistic it being. "

095 objectivity is not absolute objectivity, but only objectivity for the people .

096 Already in the concept of the thing s that when a unit is lifted out of the
infinite context of being, is the subjectively e factor.

097 All so-called sensual s qualities as such not belong to things, but arise only in
ourselves .

098 Not more than Hume we find a fundamental distinction between knowledge
and rating .

099 values are not properties of things.

100 The concept of matter is epistemologically nothing other than the objective ,
independently of human consciousness existing reality .

101 That value e ansich has considered at all does not make sense .

102 An absolute value in the sense of independence from the judgmental subject
and gewertetem object is impossible .

103 The value is erroneously as a qualification of an object viewed it.

104 Lenses standards are to human freedom incompatible.

105 Many oh-so-objective analyzes are nothing more than masked e politically e
recommendations.

106 The unconditioned , absolute can never be an object.

107 objects can only appear .

108 lens is called regardless of knowledge and want .

109 A world without objectivity, without any objectification of feelings and

thoughts is an impossibility.

110 The dead s character, the people strange and inhuman nature of objectivity.

111 For the idealism there is no from consciousness independent objectivity .

112 What the love missing is precisely the objectivity.

113 objectivity against ideologically e distortion .

114 The abolition of objectivity at all is the religious association of man with God .

115 The language provides objects that previously fluent and indistinct were
contours .

116 The language objectified by the 'Panta Rhei' of experience in a coherent order
transforms.

117 " language provided me with Vorfabrikationen for the constant objectification.
"

118 " consciousness is always intentional . There is something 'in mind', and is
directed to objects. We can never achieve consciousness as such, only
consciousness of something. "

119 Subjective activity is in thinking an object.

120 The language is of great transition point from subjectivity to objectivity .

121 The forced Re- lease the truth manifests itself as objectivity.

122 Where the begins object, hear the subject on.

123 The objects require general he forms such as time, space and causality .

124 The purely objective conception of the nature of things requires the utter
silence of the will of s. objectivity Only this enables us to artists.

125 All object exists only indirectly .

126 In the ceaseless flux of phenomena there is no insisting s substances, neither

things nor persons , nor ideas .

127 The blurring of the distinction is of true and false , of Yes and No entitle and
compel us to do so, at the objectivity of our thought s and recognizing s hold.

128 The reality is just a product of the thinking human spirit there.

129 The realist is the belief in common that there is a law moderately orderly
realm of reality are and that we call this see can.

130 object = lat. obicere to oppose .

131 General Valid e truth is not possible. Everything is relative .

132 being is consciousness , object perception .

133 The reality exists than that, as what she said consciousness . has given

134 "Only by the object is, the desire by desire is, is the subject; the desire and the
object are a pair of twins. "

135 "How the love creates its object, as well as the bitterness. "

136 "It is a crime is highest, the holiest science Lich to be . "

137 The soul is not a thing and already the talk of her being a reification and
misleading .

138 The religious experience of the Divine in the en representational.

139 Existentialism wants the consciousness sinhalte grasp their significance. No

longer in the rational en objects n was the reason for the contents of consciousness.

140 The process defeats the object e.

141 From the beginning, closes the rule about the nature of which de-skilling and
objectification one.

142 As to the product , only the price is important , so it's natural just the
quantitative predictability, not the quality content.

143 The Science beruth to constitute recognition of the independent of subjective

existing objective reality and of the recognition of objective laws .

144 annul the alienation of things leads straight into the mysticism .

145 profiling of I and subject .

146 natural science as the science of external things, spirit eswissenschaft as the
science of morality .

147 The view of the mechanists and the official science was based on the theory
that '../../but/221149 /wbdin.html "target =" _blank "> things', not relationships ,
the actual reality make.

148 No idea has real existence, because no idea is the corporeality capable.

149 We need to express our feelings and emotions after a representational en

search correspondence.

150 There is no objective appearance .

151 "The Language insured by the syntax of subject and predicate constantly that
'../../but/221149/wbdin.html "target =" _blank "> things' somehow qualities and
attributes 'have'. "

152 The term " natural "is the personification of a system s.

153 An object 'as such' can never consciousness be sinhalt, as well as a content of
consciousness 'as such' can never be an object.

154 What with a name is called, is considered a thing considered.

155 "stone", "tree" or "book" are whole groups of ideas .

156 Insgemein is assumed that the term "../../but/221149/wbdin. html "target ="
_blank "> thing" in contrast to the " idea "something called that exists outside the
mind.

157 The deception words or ideas as things to be considered.

158 Common understood is the reified e.

159 The category the thing s corresponds to the part of speech of the noun.

160 Neither words nor things can define are only concepts .

161 The classical definition of truth means conformity . using the object

162 as mind we are tangible things . compared to

163 speeches we can only what objective wins e shape. The other is
incommunicable .

164 "The philosophical methods are methods of transcendence over the

representational e. "

165 Our thinking is to objects bound.

166 existence can not be object.

167 The mystical e unity of subject and object makes the ego in any form
simultaneously with the objects disappear n.
168 words are not concepts , but can terms mean , and terms are not the things but
'apply' of things .

169 " Being is not the sum of the items . "

170 One thing is further nothing but a constant sum of sensations in

consciousness .

171 It is the idea of the thing inferred, then there is a sensationalism or materialism
, above all things a dogmatism . Or one deduces the thing from the idea, then there
is an idealism .

172 The world is not a complex of ready-made things , But most of processes.

173 The spirit chops the continuous flow of reality in a number of mutually
separated he objects .

174 The being, ie the matter is an objective, ie the knowing consciousness

independent reality .

175 The matter was regarded as the epitome of everything objectively existent .

176 The existence philosophy brings man to the consciousness that he is more than
anything that can be objectively known.

177 transcendence is non-representational .

178 suppression of personality and their identification with a soulless mechanism .

179 "If we look at it clear Remember that these formulas simply a simple graphical
means are to express a particular view, and if we take the sacred name of science
in vain to our own to praise stuff , no harm can by our actions arise. "

180 "The human personality can be last of all mechanical submit laws : the human
being is and will remain volatile and unpredictable and always finds another
loophole from the mechanistic laws and the materialist dialectic, with the crazy
soul nkundler and hagestlzene economists it ver -violent want strength ".

181 The idealistic e position the notion of realistic e of the thing s.

182 The objective time and the objective space make the objective world .

183 all objectification is mediation and mediation must remain.

184 "It is the goal of science , experience to objectify so that you no historical
moment longer adheres. This makes the scientific experiment by the way his
methodical s event. "

185 By excluding time , ie historicity and objectivity space should be guaranteed.

186 "The objects I can only 'call'. characters they represent. I can only 'from' them
speak , ' they say I can not '. A sentence can only say how a thing is, not what it is.
"

187 Materiel le things are not really the space is not really the time is not really
that I is not really .

188 The pragmatists destroy all objective standard .

189 "Social power is now more than ever by power over things taught. The more
intense the interest of an individual s is in power over things, the more things will
it dominate , the more it really missing individual traits , the more his mind into a
machine of formalized reason transformed. "

190 "All things require the name s, that they do not slip slippery access. Because
only the name makes the thing. "

191 "in the experience occurred impressions , impressions on pictures. Physical

objects are now to the practical en purposes n them under Defined by its reduction
impressions constructible be ".

192 Each science refers to a definable e objectivity .

193 "The individual is the purpose of apprehending the reality subject; the
variability of the intuitively given, is in a relationship of terms to generally
applicable valid representation, the concrete is through abstraction and analytical
methods in the same put-like rows which allow for statements of regularities ".

194 error misplaced concreteness .

195 The value is not a product of representational thinking s.

196 The problem 'whether' and 'how' objective knowledge is possible.

197 "It is as should be in a stable flowing river drawn lines are drawn figures that
could withstand. Between this reality and the mind is no relationship of
apprehension seems possible, because the term separates what in the river of life s
is connected, it represents something that is independent of the head, which it
utters is true, as generally and always. The river of life but is everywhere only
once, each wave arises in him and goes. "

198 " It may well question whether and to what extent the confidence progressive
objective knowledge is justified, to which all that in the mind sciences work
together, connected have. "

199 "The humanities are based on objective knowledge directed its object. All
researchers are linked in this pursuit. "

200 "Objective knowledge of the company , the history , the people everywhere is
their goal. The possibility of such is everywhere their condition . "
201 The belief in the objective reality of the sensory qualities is a mirage .

202 The subject as object of the senses depends on the nature of our cognitive
apparatus .

203 What we outer objects called, are nothing else than mere representations of
our sensibility .

204 " space and time are nonentities . "

205 No idea goes directly to the subject .

206 the subject , the definitum .

207 "'object' but is, in the conception of the manifold of a given intuition is united.
"

208 "... because E'en then is all our insight , by supposed objective validity of our
judgment e, nothing but pure sham . "

209 until the transfer of the time order of the phenomena makes the idea of an
object is possible.

210 "What the things in-itself may be, I do not know, and I need it not to know
because me never a thing otherwise than in the phenomenon can happen. "

211 truth or certificate are not in the object, but only in the judgment .

212 " knowledge is either intuition or concept . Those relating directly to the
subject matter and is individually ; this indirectly, by means of a feature, which
together several things can be. "

213 the object, ie the contingent .

214 We have never things' ansich 'to our actual subject .

215 "Well, that existence is all objects of outer sense doubtful . This uncertainty is
what I call the ideality external phenomena and the teaching of this ideality is
called the 'idealism'. "

216 The property is manifold of a given phenomenon combined .

217 The average life is smensch no reason - but a drive essentially the. society
Liche forced which emanates from him, is not reasonable, but a natural.

218 objectivity is a problem .

219 The mechanistic s systems deny any specific high- impact e., the matter is to
them a dead substrate, which is moved by external shocks.
220 "Everything is one "- the pure abstraction .

221 The pure rationality of the I and the outside world .

222 "This bourgeois reification is that the statements made by the people
themselves social processes them as independent of them running movements of
things appear, the inherent through this properties are related. "

223 The subject is not given but is produced .

224 The ideality of the objects resulting from represents ideality of time and
space .

225 objectification and rationalization existentially he problems.

226 In everyday s thinking or 'naive realism' are the sensory qualities to properties
of the objects collected.

227 decisions to be as objective findings declared.

228 The objective is the theoretically e world.

229 " time is for Natorp "one of the 'expressions' for the transition of knowledge ,
in which objectivity determined ". It acts "as one of the forms unit in the manifold
to donate. "

230 "The individual of ethics is the person that the person s different from
everything that's going on. "

231 "generates the end in itself and defines the concept of person , the basic
concept of ethics . Bare agent is the thing that as a matter of economic traffic s is
the goods. "

232 "... the spiritual en objects do not exist as finished, but always provide only
temporary moments in the ever continuing process acting the objectification is. "

233 The Ding-ansich is the 'caput mortuum' of abstraction .

234 " science is founded knowledge . The justification but does not relate to the
subjective attainment or development, but on the objective validity. "

235 "The epistemology is the science that the investigation at all, the objective
validity of knowledge to the task. "

236 "' method ',' ../../but/221149/wbbeg.html "target =" _blank "> word 'and'.
./../but/221149/wbgeg.html "target =" _blank "> object 'form an important triad,
the whole logic - knowledge- theoretical, ie principles of scientific and thinking
psychological problems spans. "

237 "The number . - The invention of the laws of numbers is due to the already
prevailing originally mistake made s that there are several equal e are things (but
taschlich there is nothing the same), at least that there are things (but there is no
'../ .. /but/221149/wbdin.html "target =" _blank "> thing '.) Acceptance of
multiplicity always presupposes that 'something' give you what often happens: but
just here already manages the error already there fake We essence , units ., which
does not exist / Our sensations of space and time are wrong, because they lead,
checked consistently to logical contradictions in all. scientifically s findings, we
expect inevitably always with some wrong sizes: but because these sizes at least
'constant' are such as our time and space perception, the results of science get but a
perfect strictness and security in their connection with each other, you can
fortbauen on them - even to that last end, where the erroneous assumption, that
constant errors occur in contradiction with the results, for example in the atomic
theory. Since we still feel the adoption of a 'thing' or material ' substrate ', which is
moved, forced, during the whole scientific procedure but has pursued the task to
list all thing-like (material) in movements: we distinguish here still with our
sensation Moving and Moving and come out of this circle not out, because faith is
knotted at things with our beings from time immemorial. / When Kant says' the
mind draws its laws not from nature , but she writes this before ', so this is in
regard to the' concept of nature 'completely true, which we are compelled to
connect with her, but which the summation a lot of errors of the mind is. - In a
world that 'not' our idea is, the laws of numbers are completely inapplicable: they
apply only in the human enwelt ".

238 The principle of intelligibility of nature and the principle of objectification

condition one another .

239 for a complete, complete description of a physical object is never possible.

240 "The immediate sensual s perception of a phenomenon tells us nothing about

his objective physical nature (or what we used to call it that) and must from the
outset as information excrete squelle. "

241 The ' thing- ansich 'is in Kantian view' wooden iron '.

242 "There is no indifferent, neutral reality . Today's rampant scientific conviction

that reality and is almost always entirely neutral, is a sign of repression of
spontaneous joy, playfulness, anger, disgust and fear. "

243 The theories of science are generally based on 'objective data'. Below we
understand 'any time reproducible findings . 'Only objective data on the science of
interest. One calls these data also often facts . 'objective' simply means that the
data from each subject are independent.

244 non-objectified is the creative act and the normalization .

245 knowledge is subject skonstitution.

246 "All objectivity is human objectivity or impartiality of similarly organized

beings. However, our objectivity is not absolute objectivity. "
247 The objective reality of the pure mind there concepts .

248 Each rule objectifies the ruled.

249 The objectification of the person occurs through the sale of labor power as a
commodity .

250 The cognitive theoretical task is to establish objectivity .

251 The ideal of science is objectivity.

252 The meaning of knowledge is rationalization and objectification of the world.

253 The Score must be readily than personal decision explained and should not be
hidden under the guise of objectivity.

254 The absolute objectivity is God .

255 lens, ie, abstraction of all value relationship.

256 ' causality ',' law ',' ../../but/221149/wbbeg.html "target =" _blank "> phrase 'as
categories of objectifying knowledge.

257 lens means that generally given.

258 It's hard to tell where the thinking researcher ends and the endless human
begins.

259 "Each ' story 'is from the standpoint of the value interests of present written. "

260 "The sensation is somewhat subjective, and we may from the sensations of the
senses does not close easily on the objects. The green color is not a property of the
sheet, but it is a peculiarity of the sensation that we feel at the sight of the blade. It
is the same with the other senses. Suppose all sensations gone, so is the subject of
nothing left. "

261 It is the very first requirement science Lich mindset to carry out the separation
of the outer world from the inner world. With the assumption of an independent
external world , the idea of being simultaneously legality linked in world affairs .

262 for the traditional theory , the validity of which was General concepts by the
hypothesis of equality between concept and real entity by means of the reification
of the concept and the rationalization of Thingness supported.

263 In pure nominalism all words lack any objective foundation.

264 The subject-object - relation , as in the perception is given, was originally the
prototype after the structure of conceptual knowledge was thought this. analogy
retained as long as their meaning as the term content in the sphere of any objective
remained 'given,' Here he is. but of Ockham been lifted., the term has only more
than mentally he act reality , its contents can no longer be 'given' as referred to and
in no way is more object in the traditional sense.

265 concept and object relate to each other like the cry the pain or the smoke to the
fire.

266 "In all spheres of life s and the spirit it rich the original conditions to be
replaced by constructions. This claim is objective reality to be, and if they are not,
so they are at least a step on the way to her. "

267 "Eastern detection is the consciousness itself interested, Western recognition

of the objects of consciousness. "

268 "The objectification and urge its objecthood is the key feature of the Western
mind . It is the concept that makes the object in the Western sense possible, just as
the term itself beruth on the objectified structure of the Western Spirit. "

269 "The very essence of the consciousness s to be free of any object. Therefore,
the absence of a content is not equal to the absence of consciousness. The
consciousness learns to withdraw from the object to the action field of the objects
limit and are thus closer to himself. "

270 "As for the natural science is concerned, it is now geared to calculate the
disturbance from the observer the phenomenon was introduced. The direction of
the pure object remains unshaken. The subject is, wherever one looks in the
Western world, on the retreat. This is the logical consequence of a structure that
absorbs all circumstances in their objectifying process. The absorbing unit and
power is conceptual thinking. The urge, the facts of consciousness to objectify s is
an ever-increasing expansion of conceptual structures. "

271 There is none of the discussion about the language detached discussion of
empirical realities. We always talk about the language when we talk about things
speak.

272 Institutionalism is a form of objectivity by the individual survives.

273 "The practical dogmatism in objective terms has to a great extent both the
general e consciousness, as the law e, ethical e, economically e and politically e
leavened concept formation. "

274 The ideology is the objectification of non-lenses .

275 "The concept of ideology is than its counterpart those ideology-free,

uninhibited he predicted statements. "

276 "The sense of touch responds to 'physical' properties of the body, smell and
taste on the ' chemical 'textures. The sense of touch conveys the experience of '
resistance is the matter , as if the original experience in the experience of the
world. In this resistance, as he is just experienced through the sense of touch, the
man has the final sensory evidence of the reality of a thing.
'../../but/221149/wbdin.html "Target =" _blank "> things' we experience at all, only
by him and also the sense of sight , however, this 'unreal' things already.
manchesmal man trusts his eyes not, but rather the grip of his hand. He must be
something 'understand' can to be of his existence secure. In the direction of this'
Understand volition 'is the' Substanzialisierungstendenz 'of thinking s to the effect
that we are everything that exists and for us - and our 'objective' thinking - will
have real existence, must think as exist a 'substance', the 'substance' but is no
being-but a necessity of thought "..

277 " Rational it is that things persist , not that they can change . "

278 "Take from the concept of body s the expansion, the strength and the shape
away and there is nothing left to stay. "

279 An object is nothing more than a group of phenomena or properties .

280 For all properties of things are always certain conditions such as temperature,
consistency, etc. thought along.

281 The language leads them names for nonexistent to invent objects and these
objects attributable n reality. The word realism creates pseudo-objects.

282 According to Marx, this is capital one relationship between person s mediated
by things.

283 We never have to do it with the things themselves but with our knowledge of
it.

284 In contrast to the view that science should try an 'objective reality to describe
'behind the phenomena, represented Mach the view that science only economically
've e describes the relations between the phenomena to the destination.

285 The term ' value 'means approximately the same as the terms' useful ' and '
appropriate '. Likewise, nothing in and of itself useful or appropriate,

is nothing ansich valuable. 286 Our intuition is always individually - subjectively

; the sensation sgegebene can only ' rethink 'in something objective.

287 No knowledge brings an objective reality into consciousness , but assigns at

most our consciousness according to certain standards.

288 "The knowledge creating only the object , in it he develops only as a concept
formation to logicization the sensibly given . "

289 consciousness "at all" is a mere abstraction .

290 "As the objective nature of the one, so is the I as insisting rendes, active being
the other type of existing for itself reality in the naive concept of the world. "

291 "The statement that the truth of a knowledge of the agreement is with the
object turns out to be circular : because it 'represents' the only question that
purports to solve them, the concept of '../../but/221149/wbgeg.html "target =" _
blank. "> object 'is able to give us a satisfactory answer, because in his' task' is
only in another twist, the actual content after but completely identical, repeated."

292 "The one conscious is only to 'reconstruct' from the subjective at any stage of
objectification. Otherwise, would collapse the psychology itself in objectification
and would therefore just miss the mark, but what she aims, the Subjectivity. "

293 consciousness is always a relationship , on the subject .

294 The logic of the object it

295 "objectification is only in the objectification of subjectivity, subjectivity ., only

in the subjectification of the objective "

296 Evil is in principle not be objectified and rationalized .

297 "The true beginnings and foundations of knowledge are everywhere objective
units ".

298 "The object is positive, the ' law ', it means the persisting unit , including the
changing diversity of the phenomenon is conceptually united and determined. "

299 Any change refers to the unity of the subject there.

300 all reality are sprobleme problems of construction .

301 "../../but/221149/ wbgeg.html "target =" _blank "> object such knowledge are
and remain problems of connection . "

302 "The form is true and they 'raised' the material for objectivity . "

303 "The object shape is logically e principle at all. The material itself is illogical .
The category is therefore the logical primary phenomenon. "

304 The problem of objectivity is the problem of objective, or general en 'validity'

of the knowledge s.

305 philosophy is essential method of justification ' spirit strength 'objectifications

in science , morality and art.

306 Each realization is object 's logical e-knowledge.

307 lens secured data and facts exist independently of our consciousness .

308 There is no institution that ever 'right', ie objectively binding value decisions
on behalf of society as a whole is able to meet.

309 Wherever a claim is made, it is the objectivity right he claims.

310 The cardinal question of knowledge 's and the reality , but also the legitimacy
of law and morality lies in the objectivity of things and actions . insight we have, if
we answer this question can.

311 objectification objectification means and means that the subjectively e interest
in the subject is no longer available at once or will be declared as negligible.

312 The objective exchange value is a subjective use s worth over.

313 The objectified labor is used goods . Goods is always objectified in order for
the exchange to be suitable.

314 lens is called a statement on a consensus among many or all people is reached.

315 General it as equality or similarity exists, is control and objectivity possible, ie

independence of the what is stated reachable from giving evidence.

316 objectivity is the ability and the will , the reality that not I am myself as
knower to recognize as it for themselves, apart from any you give me relationship
between and behaves.

317 "The term ' things ansich 'is a translation of Locke 's 'things Themselves' (res
ipsae) ".

318 Existence is not a predicate of any things ", it is a predicate of the idea that
one has of the things. "

319 The cardinal question of epistemology : what is called objective truth ; what is
objectivity?

320 In legal terminology it is called the objective reality 'facts'.

321 "../../but/221149/wbgeg.html" target = "_blank"> object and thinking are an

insoluble relationship . "

322 The problem of the object , or of objectivity is usually ignored.

323 The opposition of ' theory 'and' practice 'is on the bottom of the value freedom
of the facts grown and now obsolete.

324 In ' reality 'is the' work 'testified less the existence of a substance .

325 The relationship of a subject is the common train all mental .

326 "All mental facts are events, not objects ; they run like all events in the time
and are in no following moments the same as they were in the previous. "

327 Scientifically only such object recognized sbestimmungen, relying on

observable , verifiable facts on 'tangible things relate '.

328 The true e reality would be the ' thing ansich '.
329 Our terms do not depend on the objects , but the objects according to our
concepts ., we do not take the world true , as it is in reality, but as a result of our
consciousness appears sstruktur.

330 We can properties and activities difficult than thinking consisting of himself,
so we take them as if they were inherent in things.

331 object of knowledge theory is determining the relationship between

objectively what is thought and reality .

332 The validity is the objectification set . "the ratio of Valid and being is none
other than the form and content, forms the outermost and nowhere to be derived
point on the analysis of knowledge encounters. "

333 "The validity of the principle of object concept is the common logical e root of
' realities ', as described by words . "

334 "Object idea even if it is detected in its purity and universal meaning, 'there' at
the same time the particular method n be material. He constituted power of his
logical valence of the ' value 'just as - just under a different frame of reference - as
the reality constituted; he dominates the story as well as the nature of research and
bridged in this manner waive the specific methods without them. "

335 The objectivity of any description was just defined in that any reference to its
author is missing.

336 The theory of judgment s is the theory of object thought.

337 "Only with regard to the object of thought can a 'existence' of the actually
spoken. "

338 "Object idea is not the idea of a thing , although every 'thing' is constituted by
him. It is the idea of a general most relationship , each other is subjected to a
certain extent. It's the thought of a formal application principle, the highest
condition than those systems dominated by relationships that are ' science 'and'
reality 'calls. For both want to be objective and both are only force that formal
validity principle. "

339 "When we think of a subject to speak, for example, a table, we mean

something that is different from the content of the observations that we on the table
making. We can use the table view , we can feel it, we feel his strength, his
hardness, we feel a sense of pain when we find ourselves in it, etc. But of one
thing, what besides or behind all these sensations lead an independent existence,
know we nothing. Therefore, in the light of the positivism of the table nothing but
a complex of those sensations that we associate with the word table. Let's take
away all sense perceptions, so absolutely nothing is left. The question of what a
table ' in reality 'is, makes no sense. And so it goes with all the physical concepts
in general. The whole world around us is nothing more than the totality of
experiences that we have of it. Without them, the environment has no meaning . "
340 "A science that the predicate of himself objectivity but knows in principle , so
that speaks their own judgment. "

341 "The classical physics , the idealization of reality is, in the only objective
material en processes in space and time is spoken - regardless of how these
operations can be approximately presented. The quantum theory includes another
realm of reality: It can only be regarded as an idealization, in which one describes
a state by specifying how likely run certain spatio-temporal processes. "

342 "Just as everything detecting and designating , and thus the whole language on
the repetition based, ie on the choice of different circumstances, some ' same find
'so shall also the scientific e order of the world of the repetition of the law their
output. More generally based already the undertaken with the language attempt
something 'objective' represent, on the justified by the success requirement that a
solid chain of cause and effect from the 'object' to us and when we act, we lead to
the object . Without this solid causal chain could not by a ' perception be closed 'to
a particular' procedure ', and any understanding of what happens, the basis would
be withdrawn.
This situation is classical physics Community insofar as it the representation of
objective processes in space and time connecting from the start with the
assumption of complete determinacy of these processes. She designs the image of
spatial, off from the outside world physical systems whose time course is intended
for all future from its current state.
Contrary to this idealization of the state concept of quantum theory an entirely new
situation leads to the question of the determinism of natural processes cause. In
place of the 'closed' system as something continuous in space and time right here
takes the totality of possible events in space and time with the outside world, take
place at the 'Observe' of the system, as in his 'connection'. Complete determinism
could be expected here, though, if other than the state of the system and the details
of the necessary for the monitoring procedure could be considered as given. The
precise knowledge of these details would be but again only be achieved through a
close monitoring of the intervention causing observation means, if this observation
does not itself again depended on an uncontrollable engagement - in other words,
you come upon a ' regress ad infinitum ', the prevents the requirement of
determinacy of natural processes can be made useful. "

343 time is on our senses bound. It is a part of us , not 'out there'.

344 We can nature not directly observed , but we only thought abstractions deal
from her., the belief in the strict objectivity had to go up in smoke., the world is for
us not an object. Reine objectivity, without any human values is an illusion .

345 The problem of objectivity is a question of the relationship between concept

formation and Experience . It's about the conditions to which the constitution of
objects subject.

346 The solution to the constitution problem s condition scientifically he

knowledge .
347 values are not really , but 'apply'.

348 The question of the objectivity of science Lich concept formation depends
solely on the Validity of value from s.

349 the ghost of the recently-ansich

350 objectification is abstraction .

351 The common sense is inflexible objectivist.

352 "objectification brings elimination with itself. "

353 " things , the subject only with regard to the act are called, which it takes
place, and this does not belong to 'objectively' reality. "

354 "The pure content is free from the shape of the concreteness of thinking. "

355 "Human recognition it has not '../../but/221149/ wbdin.html "target =" _blank
"> things', but with consciousness sinhalten to do. "

356 "All the ' body 'are only thoughts symbols for sensation skomplexe. "

357 "Daily experience teaches us the resistance of the body to know. "

358 The causality was always as a criterion for objectivity.

359 terms are thinking economically e units that do not have things correspond.

360 "../../but/221149/wbdin.html" target = "_blank"> measurement is used to

initiate representational he identity . "

361 "on the perception of sgemheit approaches the conditions of the meet
objectivity . "

362 "The possibility and the notion of perception itself only follow from the
problem of object it. "

363 "uniqueness objective circumstances it is another term for legalism . "

364 The principle of objectivity is the supreme principle of the whole situation.

365 "If the observation is a 'fault' of the operations effected subject to these rules,
the adoption of objective, independent of all observation operations devoid of any
foundation . "

366 The object the observation will be represented differently, depending on the
circumstances and the media, depending on the tools of observation.

367 " causality is not a cause; it is the viewpoint, causes referred to the idea of
certainty, that the objectivity to put ".
368 causality guarantees, an order of time in accordance with objectivity.

369 "Another term for objectivity now is - ' necessity . '"

370 "The Justification of causality lies in the concept of justification itself, ie in

the representational conditionality. "

371 resolution of objectivity in relations .

372 "knowledge, that is, conditions of objectivity , they face random, fantasy,
imagination, dream , insanity delimit. "

373 All physical research remains the problem of the physical object it is based.

374 "The location of the ../../ but / 221149 / wbgeg.html" target = "_blank"> object
implementation is the 'I'. "

375 objectivity is not zeitortbestimmter subject .

376 "needs to be emphasized Hardly that the problems of biology and history are
not biological and historical problems. because they relate to the question of the
idea of objectivity , insonderheit the foundations of the system of the sciences .
That biology and historians may have every reason itself, to deal with them, hardly
needs mentioning; also that they have been doing to insure its own criteria. Under
what flag they do, is irrelevant. In substance, it always involves only one:. Around
the reasons and forms of variation of the object concept in the relevant research
areas "

377 " causality is a primary function of the idea of objectivity . "

378 In the sphere of public everything is objective and transferable .

379 experience and responsibility are in favor of an objective and right

manufactured prevented.

380 objectivity is all too easy to g eistig s violence against others.

381 We are looking for maintenance in the lenses.

382 "The science Liche thinking is the objective, the thinking , which the
individual does not arrive. "

383 "../../but/221149/wbgeg.html" target = "_blank"> reification and clarity is the

same. Insofar has become something representational, it has become clear to us, it
is also imitable, repeatable . Repeatable and imitable and learnable but is only fully
materialized. "

384 "The process of the emergence of walking '../../but/221149/wbgeg.html" target

= "_blank"> representational' from the ambiguous Experience is a ' creative '. "
385 The categories alone give objectivity .

386 "The reality is different , depending on whether we observe them or not . "

387 The Crazy but ../../ / 221149 / wbdin.html " target = "_blank"> thing possible
subject becomes a passive en nature, with the purpose to outer vice is gone. It has
on its status as a personality . forego

388 Absolute objectivity of the comparison s is impossible.

389 "All interest shall need advance, or bring one out, and when determining
ground of applause, it makes the judgment . upon the subject no longer be free "

390 "A reputation is none other than a thing described, but as a process. "

391 "Is the ice that flows down a glacier and is regenerated by melting and
Wiederarstarren, still the same ice? Am I still the same person I as a boy was . "

392 "It seems that - strictly speaking - the properties of a thing it is quite
immutable would be if it the same to remain Thing This Erforderung is only
fulfilled when the thing in a. moment considered Thus one comes to the
conclusion. that each thing is a power eternally renewing and reciprocally moving
states and in this flow his self (his identity ) loses Solange (but) the properties of a
thing for. practically e purposes 'reasonably' stable (or: as long as it within certain
limits vary), we want to speak of the same thing. "

393 "The doubt of the ideality of the visible, objective and representational s world
is the beginning of philosophy. "

394 "The construction of reality from solid elements seems, then the condition for
their descriptiveness to be. Were it otherwise, in the'd facts not constant, recurring
elements can be found, so the possibility of expressing and describing would stop .
"

395 "The object can not be uniquely individual , but only the General summarize,
and therefore always remains an alienation exist. Objectified being is no longer
being, it is the subject prepared for recognition purposes . The alienation of the
subject is what best suits its knowledge structure. cognition is alienation. "

396 '' The objectified world is a God -lose and un- human Liche world. "

397 knowledge is objectifying and detecting the objectification.

398 "The sense of religious en life of humanity lies in the breakthrough of the
kingdom of objectification, of the law to the need of society and nature leads out. "

399 "The depth of the ' I 'can not be objectified. A objectified' I 'is been no ' I
'anymore. "
400 The money transfer is the ultimate form of objectification.

401 "As knowledge objectification always with the ' general 'to do. "

402 "The Love wants nothing to do with the laws of the objectified world. "

403 " power is only about objects possible. "

404 All antinomies generated by the objectification.

405 "Any determination and any causal relationship is a product of objectification,

they exist only in the world of objects. "

406 The objective world is a world second hand, the 'second-hand-Edition'.

407 "The end of time is the end of objectification, the transition to the inner exist ,
the life of the spirit there. "

408 " The General established the possibility of communication . Objectification is

socialization . In the objectification and socialization starting number to rule. "

409 "The exploitation of man by man s as well as the exploitation of man by the
state is a transformation of man into an object. "

410 The interest of logicians s is an objective validity addressed.

412 " Real "we call the relation to the thingness .

413 Each object has ethically s character.

414 "thingness applies and causality applies. "

415 " suppression of the sensual s diversity by the objective requirement. "

416 "Objectivity is not personality, but to immediacy , vibrancy unlike. "

417 When love does not occur to an object.

418 terms speak only of general en characteristics of individual things.

419 "So by the science abstracted , idealized . they and their objects "

420 "The economy s order is the great enemy ; for in it is considered the thing
more than the man . "

421 The Aristotelian theory is based on the concept of so-called being. The
definition is therefore the determination of the essential nature of a thing . The
essential concept of Aristotle was until modern times. one with the nature Recently
the properties are meant that can not be changed without the thing its identity
loses. Actually it is in question, the nature of the question of the use of words .
422 "We have, for the purpose of designing an understandable image of the outside
world in an extraordinary simplification of our person in sight, they cut out so to
speak. "

423 objectivity means' neutrality of feeling 'and is therefore an absurdity.

424 "It is not the things , but the opinion about things that it does not exist , have
the people so upset . "

425 " We are not thinking frogs, not objectified and recording apparatus with cold
lodged guts . "

426 The rule sdisziplin is a kind detached discipline.

427 The objectification is essential to the technical process.

428 "The mediatization the rule by technique has the advantage of distancing ,
because the conditions objectified and are objectified and thus impersonal will. "

429 "Only a practicable possibility of a fundamental separation of His and Shall ,

ie of information and interest , science is value-free produce information.

430 "Herbert Marcuse speaks of the rule as "a function of the objective order of
things . "

431 scientists who are not tired from a knowledge of their own to talk sake.

432 "The impartiality of judgment sbildung can be achieved by the autonomy of

the will not replace nsbildung. "

433 " knowledge is theory-the theory of the realization of a common objective

world. "

434 The time is something purely objective.

435 The objective side is by no will be switched off.

436 objectivity "works" for scientific knowledge , is useful and practical , you can
deliver results .

437 substance is only a mere word - devoid of all content.

Paul Stern - The problem of givenness

Reality
see also objectivity , perception , sensation , knowledge , science , truth , Slip ,
ideology

001 The grammatical system is not fine enough for reality.

002 facts can never clearly of value en distinction be.

003 The reality is a process of continual transformation is subjected.

004 "No one has nothing seen , no one can remember any, the incident did not take
place. "

005 The European philosophy seeks reality in the substance , the Chinese in the
relation . (The object as a process)

006 In the world there are a lot more than her noticeable is.

007 requirements and standards can not of facts derived are.

008 We do not take things true , as they are in reality.

009 There are no facts, only interpretations .

010 We grow up in a certain reality that we are told that it is the only being.

011 " laws are only a picture of reality, they suppress the natural e order not better
than one word the thing. "

012 "The only world that really is not is, is reality itself. "

013 No fact can otherwise than by a character are shown.

014 All judgments concerning the facts are in a kind of analogy justified.

015 Every human symbol formation is metaphorical , a as if .

016 The dolphin lives in a predominantly acoustic world , while our reality
beruth mainly on visual perception.

017 Reality is always something Gefolgertes .

018 "Most people suffer at the mental weakness to believe, because a word was
there, there must also be the word for something, because a word dasei, the word
must correspond to something real. "

019 " The Supreme would be to comprehend that everything factual already theory
is. "

020 reality results from a number of significance s values , according to the

categories in relationship are set to conclusions allow.

021 The Art illoyalste someone to influence it, which is " facts to let them speak. "

022 "What we 'facts' call, are in reality only shadows of shadows. "

023 Throughout most of human history was the reality ' natural ', then was the reality'
technology ', a reified world. Today, the reality is the primarily social e world.

024 No science is linked to a perception of sfreie given reality.

025 Reality is a degree of consciousness s.

026 The world is a stage realm where the beings each stage has its particular forms,
laws and principles.

027 At the unit of time the unity of the world depends.

028 There are no events without someone to whom it happens and its finite
perspective the individuality justified the action.

029 It is not possible a sharp boundary to be drawn between what one immediately
sees and what one only opens .

030 It is a fatal mistake , terms for given facts and words to keep for real things.

031 facts, in which not a particular idea is put, none are capable of representation.
032 lens e standards are with human freedom incompatible.

033 "The science engages the world with hypotheses. It is a continuation of those so
characteristic of living beings attacking e attitude. "

034 The essence of realism is behind our ideas a cause to suspect that by this
distinction is.

035 "The fact is a Fieri. [something made - wp] ... The Fieri of knowledge means the
inconclusiveness, the infinite progress of scientific research - set this process
Assertiveness as a constitutive moment of knowledge itself The Fieri relates not only
regulative the. knowledge accumulation and -alteration in the positive sciences, but
constitutively the knowledge object, the thus not as a fact or fact of which could be
considered, but only as an infinite task is to think. " - Helmut Holzhey, to Natorp
Kant believes in Hans-Ludwig Ollig, materials for neo-Kantian discussion,
Darmstadt 1987, page 137

036 The sentence is a picture of reality.

037 reality is a socially shared hallucination .

038 reality is the result of communication .

039 reality world or reality are not terms that relate to something experienceable
relate.

040 facts are not something given, but are produced by us .

041 There is no uninterpreted facts.

042 The epitome of reality is for the Western thinkers with the appearance of the
world linked, for the Indians on the other hand with the soul .

043 The subject is about reality only through the intermediary of characters learn
something.

044 In reality, mind and matter are not separated .

045 We are continually faced with the challenge our ideas with the world in harmony
to bring.

046 Each species has its species-specific perception .

047 " positivists , these sycophants the factual ... "

048 No identity is given in advance, but must first be generated.

049 A method someone crazy is to make his trust in the reliability of the own feeling
s and the perception of external reality to undermine .

050 Each language is a unique kind of perception of reality is.

051 language is a " take-as "in the absence of the real situation.

052 If the language really, correspond to the logic of the world.

053 The abstraction followed by a suppression of part of the facts.

054 If there is no knowledge of an objective reality, s, is all ideology .

055 The world is a system of values , the facts as packaged are.

056 People are not only different , but they also live in different worlds .

057 reality is richer, more diverse and complicated than it bestentwickeltsten the
terms of our thought s can ever be.

058 What the irrationalist accounts is that he all claims to a recognition of the
objective en reality rejects.

059 Although the outside world may one of the individual consciousness independent
objectivity have, but can not be recognized as such by the people.

060 The higher the level of abstraction , the smaller the contact with reality.

061 space, time and causality is what we usually find in reality.

062 The world is not an object of human knowledge .

063 What we call reality is pure routine .

064 "The world is the will and imagination . "

065 By the language of man begins the world in possession to take.

066 The reality is every one other .

067 The mescaline breaks the barriers of personality a. Between person and world
creates a feeling of unity .

068 reality divided by essential and non-essential.

069 A world of contradictions SLoser thinkability or experienceability there is not.

070 It can not be many worlds give. creation of God is one.

071 "Just as all recognizing and designating, and thus the whole language on the
repetition based, ie on the choice of different circumstances, some ' same find 'so
shall also the science Liche order the world by the repetition of the law their output.
Full generally based already the undertaken with the language attempt something '
objective 'depict, on the justified by the success requirement that a solid chain of
cause and effect from the 'object' to us and when we act, we lead to the object.
Without this solid causal chain could not by a ' perception be closed 'to a particular'
procedure ', and any understanding of what is happening would be deprived of their
basis. This situation is classical physics Community insofar as it the representation of
objective processes in space and time connecting from the start with the assumption
of complete determinacy of these processes. She designs the image of spatial, off
from the outside world physical systems whose time course is intended for all future
from its current state. In contrast to this idealization of the state concept of quantum
theory a completely new situation brings about the question of determinism of
natural processes. In place of the 'a bgeschlossen en ' system s as something
continuous in time and space in front of him occurs here the totality of possible
events in space and time, the 'Watch' yourself when the system, as in his 'connection'
with the outside world, play. Complete determinism could be expected here, though,
if other than the state of the system and the details of the necessary for the
monitoring procedure may be regarded as given. The precise knowledge of these
details would be but again only be achieved through a close monitoring of the
intervention causing observation means, if this observation does not itself again
depended on an uncontrollable engagement - in other words, you come here on a
regress ad infinitum , which prevents that the demand for determinacy of nature can
be processes found useful. "

072 On the subatomic level exists matter not with security at certain locations .

073 perception and interpretation of facts is always due to an advance know s and a
whole structure of prejudice.

074 It are not identical facts.

075 The world disappears behind the worldview .

076 The reality impressions correspond to the mental en sensations .

077 If we want to penetrate into reality, we need our usual language largely forgotten
and in the language of symbols think.

078 The melancholy man has a sense of the unreality of things.

079 reality consists of units that the human is consciousness but only polar reveal.

080 pleasure principle contrasting reality principle.

081 What 'is', is never static, but always in motion .

082 subdivision of the physical world in an observed system (object) and an

observing subject (subject).
083 Who has understood the reality, leaning not against them .

084 The pain as the epitome of subjective reality he.

085 fantasy and reality form a magical unit.

086 The reference to work the reference is to reality.

087 "because reality itself is simply historically , not generally . "

088 In the emotionally s life is right now the only reality.

089 reality is always based on opinions and the meaning or value ascribed to the
facts will.

090 relationship is slosigkeit worldlessness .

091 When the real rational , then is power equal rights .

092 non isolated facts, but relationships create reality. Isolated facts, there are only
ever in mind . The thinking is that things mentally to their contexts isolate .

093 Brahman, the last external reality is with Atman, the inner reality identical.

094 The subjectivity is the problem of a theory of reality.

095 The theory is the network that we Eject to capture the world, they rationalize ,
explain, and dominate .

096 Ultimate Reality can never be an object logical reasoning or demonstrable

knowledge be s.

097 property is nothing more than a fact. Facts but do not create a right .

098 If we have a merely material present world, then there is no room for falsehood
in the world.

099 There are not facts, but discrepancies that the memory be interested .

100 A Valuable is under all circumstances a real.

101 "In this respect, the propositions of mathematics refer to reality, they are not
certain , and insofar as they are certain, they do not refer to reality. "

102 Between Ideal and reality is always a contradiction .

103 Modern man behaves normally as if there is only one would be reality.

104 There is no universal truth and no universal rationality is not even a universal
reality.
105 Trust is not our reality, but their common sight .

106 Each question is after the actual reality easily as escapism designed.

107 What is real is not a function of human perspective .

108 The truth , ie reality and power .

109 The reality is infinite .

110 The scientific e method eliminates all moments of reality that can not be
captured by this method .

111 The boundary between appearance and reality is never to pull clear.

112 objects with properties to be perceived , which do not provide them in reality.

113 In a relativistic s frame of reference is the question of a change of the world

pointless.

114 "Every fact depends of theoretical assumptions from s. By and by theoretical

character of all the facts. "(" Theoretical fact ")

115 It is impossible that be what ' should 'derive from what' is'.

116 Each region of reality has its own form of knowledge .

117 The world can not be in Think dissolve, it is not logically necessary.

118 "The limit of the natural science s knowledge is the individualized e reality, the
only described, not conceived to be. "

119 By language we can with a situation in absentia operate.

120 "That Something is something just as differentes , as property Handsome,

headstrong . "

121 All determination is limitation and reduction of reality. (determinatio est negatio)

122 The mystics claim that the reality can only detect when the mind gives up his
claim to it .

123 In the world everything is as it is , it is in their no value .

124 "Each reality is essentially bipolar , physically and mentally ... "

125 In fact, there is no problem. problems only exist in the head. So is the reality of
the problem.

126 Psychologically there are as many worlds as there are minds.

127 Originally containing I everything, later it separates its outside world from itself.

128 Our language gives us a bipolar division of Nature . However, the nature itself is
not so polarized .

129 The reason over everything real is the power over all reality the same.

130 The word " is "conceals the mystery of mysteries.

131 In man is an eternal urge against all just real revolt.

132 If everything that's what we want to keep it , then everyone disappears difference
between reality and delusion .

133 implementation takes precedence over reality.

134 The science subjects the phenomenal world categories .

135 Everything that is, is either a thing , or as consciousness . A median does not
exist.

136 The Insane moves in a world without borders .

137 unit and universality are empirically not find s world.

138 The General is a more real reality, as the Special .

139 Something has its existence only within temporal and spatial boundaries .

140 In naive realism is the nature of their innermost nature as a rational considered.

141 What is there is always the individual , the abstract e does not exist .

142 The suffering and not the recognition is the primary relationship to the human
world.

143 The Satan is always a realist.

144 "The objects can 'call' me. characters they represent., I can only 'from' them
speak . 'you I can not speak'. A sentence can only say how a thing is not what it is. "

145 The nature is as a by laws construed to preemptory.

146 The stream of impressions that we gain from the world, of our linguistic system ,
the language , organized .

147 facts are value-free . A value judgment is not a statement of fact.

148 The world is an idea , what we see is not the world.

149 non facts justify laws , but the convenience of our thought s based laws on facts
as terms of perception based.

150 About the sensory impressions , there are only things in themselves .

151 The psychological e reality has only one wish , that logic only one Shall .

152 The finger movements in knitting are too complicated that we do without the
purpose may interpret "knit" word.

153 The Rightly Make the world usefulness s purposes allows us our existence. We
create a world of identical cases s, which is calculable, simplified and
understandable.

154 The language , or our mental conception determines our perception of the world.

155 The things are only really if you look at their reality agreed has.

156 We conduct us to the world by means of our habits .

157 Just because us the death prowls the world is an unfathomable mystery.

158 reality is the structure that we impose on reality.

159 All facts in our knowledge are received already seen in a certain way and
therefore much more idealistic .

160 All facts are ideologically e constituents and older views.

161 The reality principle is a utility s, performance and security sprinzip.

162 "Man learns through his senses as much of reality as the spider from the palace,
in the corner she has spun her web. "

163 The to measure de reality is never static but flows.

164 Everything real is time .

165 logic gives us no knowledge of the reality, but only of the conceptual en
relations.

166 The Science constructs the things and processes of nature in purely conceptual it
to derive certain facts manner derived able.

167 The real is the Individual , Unique and Temporal , which is subjected to the
process of becoming, whereas the ideals a General means timeless and eternal, the of
any change will be affected.

168 There is no higher kind of reality than the direct e experience reality.
169 The death is the sonnenklarste reality we possess.

170 neurosis is the world's loss.

171 The suffering is an inevitable part of our conscious confrontation with the reality
that needs to accept it.

172 The solidified concept of reality is the Tatsachenhaftigkeit limited to the mere
fact as such, the process reality is raped or ignored .

173 The relativity According consists not only for themselves.

174 perception is not proof of reality .

175 The word "really" has only one meaning in terms of " unreal ".

176 There are degrees of comprehension of reality.

177 One must terminology and real problems not confused.

178 for the event , care must be, then, makes the law already for themselves.

179 The truth of what 'is'.'s

180 The natural tendency of people is towards the Thought to take immediately for
the expression of the world in the forms of thought to perceive reality forms.

181 The freedom is a mere idea without reality .

182 We idealize things or personalize the ideas.

183 A " thing "is just the desired resting point for our thinking.

184 The existing world is an invention -., there is only an expectant world

185 The realism is a truism of common sense with the assumption that "the outside
world there" largely by us and our activity en independently exists.

186 The most basic of all opposites is between being and Shall , or between reality
and value , or norm .

187 There are only a few ways in where we stand with the outside world, namely our
five senses .

188 All the essentials remains unsaid and unasked, if we with harmless universal
ideas approach the reality.

189 layer, level, hierarchy, and class are order s and no real phenomena.

190 structure categories are necessary static. They describe relationships in an

disengaged from its procedural context structure.

191 The translation of reality in language stripped of reality inevitably its dynamic
quality and replaced movement through metaphor .

192 "Facts are observations , made by people that the nature ask the corresponding
question. The form and meaning of the question , however, is already a theory and
facts must, because they are dumb and stupid to respond, whether the theory is right
or not. "

193 facts exist only as application of theory .

194 terms are expression medium and have no reality .

195 The typical general fallacy of thinking s transformed subjectively e thought

processes in objectively e world processes.

196 categories are not fit to experience the reality.

197 The essence of abstraction is equating a reality with the unreal .

198 The categories are auxiliary notions through which the thinking , the business
facilitates and enables the calculation of reality.

199 The change of reality is essential in the transformation of sensation smaterials in

abstract e categories .

200 The logical e function removes the given by reality.

201 The categorical processing the sensation is already the distortion of the given
reality.

202 The abstractively e method is the neglect of reality elements for the purpose of
scientific simplification.

We succumb to a significant fraud , if we consider the logical relations hold for the
direct expression of reality.

206 Once you pass a fact a uniformity discovered one speaks immediately of any law
.

207 Pure science is only accessible to the question what 'is', not be what ' should '.

208 The cool logic and their human lichkeitsfremde objectivity and calculability.

209 The idealism is consciousness of reality the same.

210 The rule de reality principle is so powerful .

211 intermediate general s character and individually he is really an unbridgeable he

opposed .

212 logic e phrases do not press any facts, but rather are just rules the transformation
of statements.

213 The mind has a tendency everything flowing Done in substances transform
dense.

214 Not the things themselves disturb the people, but their opinions about things. We
suffer more often to the idea than the reality.

215 In the Gospels world and evil almost used synonymously.

216 The Want binds us to the world.

217 The coexistence of many states is the essence of reality.

218 A language that the world not recognizing split we do not have.

219 The original question of all skepticism is the question of the truth of the reality
world.

220 The time is the first real.

221 The world the reality is independent of their world of ideal against en being, the
kingdom of ideas, values and truths .

222 The concept of reality is not a science Lich term.

223 The concept of reality is an absolutely politically it.

224 strips we all thought content from, we recognize that the world is a connection of
colors, sounds, smells, tastes , etc. is.

225 concepts and realities are incomparably different and can not be converted into
one another. Only the recognition of this distinction makes reasonable it thought
possible and any blurring of the distinction leads to large errors .

226 Each character his own world apart.

227 When the consciousness is no difference more familiar between imagination and
reality, it's crazy .

228 reality and truth are what they are, independently of our ideas .

229 certainty is both truth and reality.

230 There is no reality without someone for whom she really is.
231 The mind thinks only objects as such and not their Realsein. The Realsein of
things remains our experience reserved.

232 Only Experience , not thinking is essentially determined as reality.

233 contrast between being and Shall , value and reality.

234 The value relationship is the criterion under the plethora of individually en facts
significant and insignificant to differ .

235 The egoism is that man all reality to his own person limited.

236 The devil is the prince and god of the world.

237 With words we never get over the pictorial representation of the world beyond.

238 For the skeptics , we can in reality only the glow recognize.

239 The world has except the physical meaning nor a morally e.

240 The target point of realism is the object without a subject .

241 The success of science beruth to a reduction of reality to one or the other aspect,
such as the reduction of quality to quantity .

242 Since the 17th century, we think of reality as something that all competent
observers n equal access must be.

243 There is a blind passion the human mind to a whole series of facts from a single
cause dissipate.

244 Always adds the imagination in the description of reality, something added or
can be slightly off .

245 , the axiom of the intelligibility of the world.

246 The child's science confused idea with fact.

247 An absolutely solid, independent of us and yet We recognized there existence

does not exist and can not exist.

248 The harmony that we create in the phenomena is pure speculation .

249 reality so little a reality according to our wish is, it's the only reasonably firm
foundation of our spiritual existence .

250 Any falsification of reality grasps the basics of our spiritual existence to.

251 The real nature of things consists in a structure , therefore we need the objective
certainly not in fact isolated substances to search.
252 " reason and reality are nothing, as a general consensus .

253 In principle, there are no mysterious, unseen powers . One can rather all things
by calculating dominate, which is equivalent to the disenchantment of the world.

254 not nominal but real.

255 What us the reality believe makes is ultimately the constancy with which some
sensual e influences on our perception act sapparat .

256 "The apparent world is the only one: the true is only added anything ".

257 We have the concept of purpose invented s only, in reality, lack of purpose.

258 There is no moral en facts or there is only moral facts.

259 The world is largely according to rationally established en means.

260 The nature is something that is not according to our thinking is ordered.

261 The nature is explainable .

262 The strict, the abiding, not adhering to the phenomena of knowledge of the
world was mathematically , here corresponds to the spirit of his subject .

263 The world is broken, when the mind touches on their secrets.

264 The perfect world is a world that is not yet the recognition is penetrated -., the
world of children

265 parents need as adults for the world of Children stand.

266 The congruence of word and thing is imaginary.

267 One can not of the space-time to go out and then try to make a theory of the
objective to develop s reality. At the quantum level, there is no solid objects , the
classical concepts do not apply here. Space and time are those classical ideas.

268 physicists searched for basic building blocks of matter and expressed their
theories in fundamental principles of.

269 paradoxes are a teaching method to the dynamic structure to point to the reality.

270 ego strength and the recognition of time and space are essential criteria for the
definition of mental health .

271 What you can not measure and quantify can not scientifically .

272 reality is what you his attention is directed.

273 Only what we see, smell hear, touch or otherwise by our sense organs perceive is
true and has value . Reality and sensorial values.

274 The so-called facts are explanations or concepts , but no facts.

275 The logical contradiction slosigkeit a sentence is not proof of its empirically e
reality.

276 The difference between what is possible and is something real source of growing
discontent