Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
PROCEDURE
La Madrid, Rafael ATTY. BYRON SAN
PEDRO
Panganiban, Shanna Mae
ARELLANO LAW
Pinlac, Jairus
Ramarama, Jico
Toledo, Madeline
___________________________________________-
______________________________________________________________________
RULE 113 ARREST
Section 1. Definition of Arrest- Arrest is the taking of a person into
custody in order that he may be bound to answer for the commission of
an offense.
Arrest
2. Guidelines:
CASES:
Callanta vs. Enage (G.R. No. L-27695)
The questioned order directing the issuance of a warrant for the
arrest of the accused after the proceeding conducted by the
respondent Judge, without prior notice to the accused but which
the respondents claim to be the preliminary examination and
preliminary investigation required by the rule, was without any
legal basis and, therefore, null and void.
1. Petition to Quash
CASES:
Section 3. Rule 113: Duty of Arresting Officer It shall be the duty of the
officer executing the warrant of arrest the accused and deliver him to the
nearest police station or jail without unnecessary delay.
A duly issued warrant not only authorizes the proper, officer to make an
arrest there under but also makes it his duty to carry out without delay the
commands thereof. It is the duty of the officer to execute a warrant which
is valid in form and issued by a court by a competent jurisdiction, and
where a warrant is valid on its face, the officer is under no duty to inquire
further into its basis or alleged invalidity before making the arrest.
Once the judge issues the warrant of arrest, the head of the office
to whom the warrant of arrest was delivered for execution has the duty
to make sure the warrant is served within 10 days from its
receipt. Once the period expires, the officer to whom it was assigned for
execution shall make a report to the judge who issued the warrant. In
case of his failure to execute the warrant, he shall state the reasons
therefor.
The reason for the mandatory 10-day to execute and report after
expiration of said 10 days is to hope that it would remedy the delay in the
disposition of criminal cases. But there is no penalty for the failure to
serve the warrant of arrest in the said period. However, be it noted that
no time limit is fixed for validity of an arrest warrant; it is subsistent and
continues to be in force even if not served within the mandatory 10-days
as long as it has not been recalled, or the person named therein arrested
or otherwise submitted himself to the jurisdiction of the court.
CASES:
In cases falling under paragraphs (a) and (b) above, the person arrested
without a warrant shall be forthwith delivered to the nearest police
station or jail and shall be proceeded against in accordance with section 7
of Rule 112.
Burden of Proof
In the arrest of a person without a warrant, the burden of proof is with
the person arresting or causing the arrest to show that the arrest
was lawful.
Rationale
To hold that no criminal can, in any case, be arrested and searched
without a warrant, would be to leave society, to a large extent, at the
mercy of the shrewdest, the most expert, and the most depraved of
criminals facilitating their escape in many instances.
People v. Malasugui (63 Phil 221)
Note
The warrantless arrest must fall within the provisions of Rule 113,
Section 5.
Alih v. Castro (151 SCRA 279)
CASES:
Elements
1. An offense has just been committed
2. The person to make the arrest has probable cause to believe,
based on personal knowledge of facts or circumstances, that
the person to be arrested has committed it.
CASES:
Elements:
1. The person to be arrested is a prisoner
2. Said prisoner escaped from a penal establishment or place
where he is serving final judgment or is temporarily
confined while his case is pending, or while he is being
transferred from one place to another.
Founding principle
At the time of arrest, the escapee is in the continuous act of
committing a crime, i.e., the evasion of service of sentence.
Unlike a search warrant which must be served only in daytime, an arrest may
be made on any day and at any time of the day, even on a Sunday. This is
justified by the necessity of preserving the public peace.
GENERAL RULE is: the officer must inform the person to be arrested of
Under this rule, an arrest may be made even if the police officer is not in
possession of the warrant prior to the arrest. Exhibition of the warrant of prior to
the arrest is not necessary. However, if after the arrest, the person arrested so
requires, the warrant shall be shown to him as soon as practicable.
MALLARI V CA
(December 9, 1996)
HELD: This is not a case of a warrantless arrest but merely an instance of an arrest
effected by the police authorities without having the warrant in their possession at
the precise moment. Finding as it does, this court deems it unnecessary to delve
into the applicability of Section 5, rule 113 of the Rules of Courts and on the merits
of both the petitioners and the Office of the Solicitor Generals arguments with
respect thereto. The applicable provision is not Section 5 on Rule 113 on
warrantless arrest, but Section 7, Rule 113.
Section 8. Method of arrest by officer without warrant. When making an
arrest without a warrant, the officer shall inform the person to be arrested of his
authority and the cause of his arrest, unless the latter is either engaged in the
commission of an offense, is pursued immediately after its commission, has
escaped, flees, or forcibly resists before the officer has opportunity to so inform
him, or when the giving of such information will imperil the arrest.
GENERAL RULE: the officer must inform the person to be arrested of:
PEOPLE v MAHINAY
February 1, 1999
HELD: The Court, as a guardian of the rights of the people lays down the
procedure, guidelines, and duties which the arresting, detaining, inviting or
investigating officer or his companions must do and observe at the time of making
an arrest and agaisn at the time of the custodial interrogation in accordance with
the Constitution, jurisprudence and Republic Act 7438.
Reported by:
Toledo, Madeline S.
As a rule:
Except:
Person to be arrested:
(d)Forcibly resists before the person making the arrest has opportunity
to so inform him; or
Section 10, Rule 113: An officer making a lawful arrest may orally
summon as many persons as he deems necessary to assist him in
effecting the arrest. Every person so summoned by an officer shall assist
him in effecting the arrest when he can render such assistance without
detriment to himself.
- Only an officer making the arrest may orally or in writing (which is more legally
effective):
Requisites:
Note: