Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Digital Transformation
Competency Centers
Dr. Setrag Khoshafian and Paul Roeck
Pegasystems Inc.
Pegasystems has set a new standard for empowering business architects to
design and execute business change programs.
With Pega, you gain a faster, proven solution for successfully addressing key
goals, such as:
The Forrester Wave is copyrighted by Forrester Research, Inc. Forrester and Forrester Wave are trademarks of Forrester Research,
Inc. The Forrester Wave is a graphical representation of Forrester's call on a market and is plotted using a detailed spreadsheet with
exposed scores, weightings, and comments. Forrester does not endorse any vendor, product, or service depicted in the Forrester Wave.
Information is based on best available resources. Opinions reflect judgment at the time and are subject to change.
This special presentation of:
Digital Transformation
Competency Centers
Setrag Khoshafian and Paul Roeck,
Pegasystems Inc.
is a certified true copy and is extracted with permission from the book:
All rights reserved. Manufactured in the United States of America. No part of this work covered
by the copyright hereon may be reproduced or used in any form or by any meansgraphic,
electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, or information storage and
retrieval systemswithout written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief
quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews.
COPYRIGHT INFORMATION
Future Strategies Inc.
The content of this book preview is fully copyrighted under international copyright
law and treaties.
http://goo.gl/OVxscR
http://bpm-books.com
Table of Contents
Special Edition
Best Practices for
Knowledge Workers
Innovation in Adaptive Case Management
Appendices
AUTHOR APPENDIX 30
7
FOREWORD
Knowledge work has typically been performed by people applying their own skills
and intelligence, but newer technologies are being introduced that allow automa-
tion and machine learning to augment the human capabilities.
The technology demonstrations at bpmNEXT bore this out with a strong focus on
adding machine intelligence to knowledge work, not just automating tasks. Work-
ers performance is enhanced by systems that enforce compliance, offer smart rec-
ommendations, automate low-skill tasks and integrate with remote devices, while
allowing them to apply their skills to make the decisions that require human intel-
ligence.
HOW DO WE MAKE ACM SMARTER?
More intelligent ACM requires the judicious application of a variety of technologies,
some of which pre-build intelligence into the ACM system, while others incorporate
machine learning to add intelligence to case work on the fly.
Ring-Fencing Compliance With Rules
Knowledge work relies on the participants to apply the correct business rules and
regulatory controls at every step; however, that can introduce risk in an environ-
ment of rapidly-changing regulations, and create a burden on less-experienced
knowledge workers.
Declarative rules that trigger when an action may breach compliance ensures that
the decisions and outcomes are fully compliant, without limiting the tasks that the
knowledge worker uses to achieve those outcomes.
Avoiding Information Overload With Intelligent Analytics
Knowledge workers derive insights from an array of information related to a case in
order to choose the correct course of action, and can become overwhelmed with a
large volume of information from different sources.
Using intelligent analytics to aggregate, filter and distill the information provides
the worker with a more manageable set of information on which to base their deci-
sions, while still allowing access to the underlying data sources.
Recommending A Course Of Action With Predictive Analytics
Knowledge work requires a long learning curve to reduce the risk of incorrect deci-
sions, or close mentoring from more experienced workers.
As an extension of the intelligent analytics that provide informational context, pre-
dictive analytics can provide the worker with multiple what-if scenarios, and rec-
ommend the next best action or decision in order to reach the desired outcome.
Automating Semi-Skilled Tasks With Machine Learning
Knowledge workers often perform semi-skilled tasks for their own cases, since the
time required to hand off tasks to a less-skilled worker may interrupt their work or
reduce their effectiveness.
Machine learning can monitor the tasks and decisions of a knowledge worker, then
derive automated methods of performing the same tasks. This is particularly useful
for semi-skilled tasks such as the classification of unstructured content (e.g., doc-
uments and photographs) and simple claims adjudication.
Interacting With The Real World With Events
Knowledge work can be impacted by asynchronous and unplanned external events
ranging from a customers actions to stock market fluctuations to the physical
location of an order that provide input and guidance as the work moves towards
8
FOREWORD
its goal. A knowledge worker may manually monitor these events and consider how
they impact the work before deciding on activities to perform.
Event processing can listen for events generated by other systems and devices, then
automatically trigger actions or update case data based on rules related to those
events.
Detecting Emergent Case And Process Models With Data Mining
Knowledge work is, by its nature, unpredictable: the entire set of activities used to
reach an outcome may be different for each case, and may be done in a different
order. Within the unstructured overall process, some subset of activities may be
relatively routine, forming a standardized subprocess performed in the same way
for each case.
Process and data mining detect the patterns in activities performed by a knowledge
worker, and may be able to automatically derive case and process models for sub-
sets of the work. Once standardized and modeled, these subprocesses may lend
themselves to automation.
HOW DO WE ENCOURAGE SOCIAL COLLABORATION?
There is a great deal of evidence that collaborative, dynamic, goal-directed
knowledge work improves agility, profitability and customer satisfaction, due to
better decision-making and more innovative problem-solving. No matter how intel-
ligent ACM systems become, this knowledge work still requires the skills of the
people to get the work done, and often requires collaboration between multiple par-
ticipants in order to achieve the optimal outcome, since one person may not have
all of the information, skills or time to complete the work.
Barriers to Collaboration
At some level, most organizations recognize the benefits of collaboration, especially
in the areas of knowledge work and innovation. In practice, however, many organ-
izations dont measure or reward collaboration, only individual effort, creating sig-
nificant barriers to collaboration.
From an organizational standpoint, theres a misalignment between corporate goals
and operational execution: executives want collaboration across silos, but manag-
ers rewards are based on efficiency performance targets. Because of this, the man-
agers set individual transactional incentives for their workers such as number of
cases completed that discourage collaboration. Furthermore, these performance
measures are based on efficiency, not service levels, which encourages workers to
get work done quickly but not necessarily solve a customers problem. Social con-
tributions and collaboration are often not measured or rewarded.
Technology plays a part in hindering collaboration, too: metrics related to social
collaboration are not well-understood, and systems used by knowledge workers
only track activity cost and efficiency metrics: important, but not the whole picture.
Measuring and Rewarding Collaboration
Weve made significant progress in knowledge worker management practices by
allowing workers to define the nature and order of activities required to complete
their work, rather than constraining them to pre-defined processes. Allowing them
to determine who should help them complete the work, and when, is an important
next step: without collaboration, knowledge work will never reach its full potential.
To start, organizations need to recognize that their corporate and individual perfor-
mance metrics may be in conflict when it comes to collaboration. Worker incentives
9
FOREWORD
should set expectations for collaboration and social participation, and provide re-
wards aligned with customer service and process improvement, not just transac-
tional efficiency.
Methods of measuring social collaboration are moving beyond organizational psy-
chology and into the systems used by knowledge workers, although these are still
early days for the technology. Metrics based on workers interaction patterns and
social influence provide a more accurate measure of individual contributions to
collaborative efforts, and can be used to correlate the quality of outcomes with the
degree of collaboration. Social graph analysis can be used to guide collaboration: it
can identify and discourage overly-strong ties (which lead to idea inbreeding), while
strengthening weak ties (which encourage cross-functional innovation). Peer recog-
nition, although a more subjective measure, provides insight into the quality of
interactions.
Its also important to include more traditional metrics that are focused on collabo-
ration and problem-solving, such as customer satisfaction and time to resolution,
and attempt to correlate the quality of the decision with the degree of collaboration.
Once collaboration metrics are integrated into the systems that support knowledge
workers, dynamic incentives based on real-time interaction information can estab-
lish the collaboration habit, increase social intelligence, and create a more agile
organization that can respond quickly to new challenges. By rewarding workers for
social interaction and flexibility, teams will create new patterns of interaction to
accommodate changing conditions and make better decisions.
CONCLUSIONS
Developing systems and management practices to support knowledge workers is a
constantly-evolving challenge. Ive brought focus to two areas where I see significant
opportunities for early adopters: the swirling mass of new technologies coalescing
into intelligent ACM, and the emerging field of social collaboration metrics.
Intelligent ACM incorporating rules, analytics, machine learning, event processing
and data mining provides a platform to not just support knowledge workers, but
significantly enhance their productivity by automating activities and decisions that
dont require their level of skill. Freed from routine work, they can focus on adding
the value that only people can provide: complex decision-making, problem resolu-
tion, collaboration and innovation.
As collaboration gains in importance for knowledge workers, social metrics provide
management with tools to encourage collaboration, aligning the actions of workers
with corporate goals.
Within a year or two, these will both be mainstream in terms of technology and
organizational culture, and we will have a new crop of technology and organiza-
tional culture ideas to figure out. I cant wait.
Sandy Kemsley
Industry Analyst and Consultant
Kemsley Design Ltd.
10
Introduction and Overview
Best Practices for Knowledge Workers describes ACM in the current era of dig-
itization, Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence (AI), intelligent BPMS
and BPM Everywhere. You will learn how support of adaptive, data-driven pro-
cesses empowers knowledge workers to know in real-time what is happening
at the edge points, and to take actions through the combination of rule-driven
guidance and their own know-how. It is not a traditionally-automated system
but intelligent automation, where technology doesnt merely replace human
decision-making but extends the reach of the knowledge worker; making IoT
data actionable.
As Sandy Kemsley points out in her foreword:
As adaptive case management (ACM) systems mature, we are moving
beyond simple systems that allow knowledge workers to define ad hoc
processes, to creating more intelligent systems that support and guide
them. Knowledge workers still need to dynamically add information, de-
fine activities and collaborate with others in order to get their work done,
but those are now just the table stakes in a world of big data and intel-
ligent agents. To drive innovation and maintain operational efficiencies,
we need to augment case work typically seen as relying primarily on
human intelligence with machine intelligence. In other words, we need
intelligent ACM.
Highly predictable work is easy to support using traditional programming
techniques, while unpredictable work cannot be accurately scripted in ad-
vance, and thus requires the involvement of the knowledge workers them-
selves. The core element of Adaptive Case Management (ACM) is the support
for real-time decision-making by knowledge workers.
11
INTRODUCTION
12
Digital Transformation
Competency Centers
Dr. Setrag Khoshafian and Paul Roeck,
Pegasystems Inc., USA
INTRODUCTION
Digitization is often characterized through a number of key technologies such as
Social, Mobile, Analytics, Cloud, and Internet of Things (IoT1, IoE2, M2M3, IIoT4 with
related, but different, connotations).
However, the real impact of digitization is echoed in the corridors of small, medium
and especially large enterprises through Digital Transformation (DX)[1].
In the next few years the impact of Digital Transformation will accelerate, giving
rise to the DX economy as predicted by analyst firm IDC. In this era of digitization,
automation has become pervasive. A recent study by McKinsey identified four fun-
damentals of workplace automation [2]: automation of activities, redefinition of jobs
and business processes; the impact of high wage of occupations; and the future of
creativity and meaning.
The results of the surveys are quite interesting. Automation will impact all catego-
ries of work and wage occupations, but not necessarily via predictable norms.
As organizations try to leverage digitization specifically to automate work they are
often faced with a healthy tension between two compelling approaches:
Digital Innovation Speed: accelerated and expressed digital application de-
velopment for automation
Digital Competency Best practices: enablement, methodologies, governance,
and re-use to optimize delivery of work automation solutions
Often organizations pursue the next digital technology shining object without tak-
ing into account the competency perspective. The latter is critical for success. This
tension between hacking and best practices discipline is as old as engineering. As
organizations attempt to accelerate their work automation solutions across the ex-
tended digital enterprise, it becomes even more critical to take a closer look at the
core competency center enablement.
Knowledge-Assisted Work in Dynamic Case Management (DCM)
Digitization and especially work automation trends are changing or even disrupting
entire industries. There are many sources of knowledge or know-how. The spec-
trum of workers begins with clerical or manufacturing workers; repetitive and pre-
dictable work that can easily be automated. At the other end of the spectrum is the
knowledge worker. Knowledge workers are the experts. They are cognitive workers.
They innovate and produce ideas for new products as well as the policies and pro-
13
DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION COMPETENCY CENTERS
cedures in the organization. Between these two, you have the most important cat-
egory that represents the majority of workers; the knowledge-assisted worker. The
impact of a digitization platform on work automation for all categories of workers is
significant, especially with Dynamic Case Management [3] and digitized business
rules as well as analytics.
14
DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION COMPETENCY CENTERS
cloud, big data and most importantly the Internet of Things. IT needs to be
involved not only in maintenance (keeping the lights on with existing leg-
acies) but high visibility and innovation, while differentiating solutions for
the enterprise.
The need for Competency Centers in the Digital Age
In a previous paper [6] we expanded upon the meta-model of the BPM Center of
Excellence (aka Competency Center). The overall approaches, models, and govern-
ance are augmented with digital transformation trends. There is a wide range of
capabilities and technologies that can be leveraged and operationalized in digital
speed, while guaranteeing best practices, enablement and re-use within teams and
across the digital enterprise. It is a tall and challenging order that is absolutely
necessary to ensure success of DX initiatives.
In the digital era, the role of the Competency Center is becoming more not less
important.
The DX platform supports intelligent Dynamic Case Management capabilities.
These include structured processes; dynamic cases; rich collection of rule types;
robust integration (services or micro-services and content); support for IoT; social
collaboration; mobile application tools; flexibility for cloud or on premise; as well as
analytics of Big Data (predictive and machine learning). Accordingly, the method-
ologies, enablement and governance practices of a DX CC are being transformed
due to the DX imperatives and the richness of the DX platform.
The essential DX CC charter, among other areas, spans enablement for DX, review
of DX best practices, governance for DX and DX re-use strategies.
Business Benefits of the DX CC
The scope and business benefits of a mature and robust DX CC includes the fol-
lowing:
Enabling 2 Speed IT: innovation speed and maintenance; enablement and
governance through the DX CC. Organizations must balance transform-
ing slower, transactional legacy systems with developing new fast-speed
architecture. Even with the digitization trends, the vast majority of IT re-
sources are spent keeping the lights on. The Cloud is introducing new op-
portunities as well as challenges in the 2 speed IT.
Business Empowerment and Involvement: supporting the best practices of
involving the business in innovation for new products and services, mak-
ing changes to existing services, and continuous social interaction with IT
and Operations.
Continuous Improvement: digital enterprises, much like their predeces-
sors, inherit the inefficiencies of their predecessors. The waste and stove-
piped execution of value streams are still very much a challenge.
Leveraging the Digital Transformation Platform: the core enabler for DX CC
is the DX platform. An essential role of the DX CC is the governance and
best practices in leveraging the platform for the aforementioned DX re-
sults.
Work Automation Best Practices leveraging cyber and physical robots:
digital technology strategies impacting the CC is also transforming the fu-
ture of work. Most importantly, both software (cyber) and physical robots
are entering the workforce. Equally important is the emergence of
knowledge assistance for human workers.
15
DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION COMPETENCY CENTERS
16
DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION COMPETENCY CENTERS
17
DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION COMPETENCY CENTERS
18
DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION COMPETENCY CENTERS
19
DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION COMPETENCY CENTERS
20
DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION COMPETENCY CENTERS
REFERENCES
[1] IDC (2016). Digital Transformation (DX): An Opportunity and an Impera-
tive http://www.idc.com/prodserv/decisionscapes/RESOURCES/AT-
TACHMENTS/IDC_254721_ExecBrief_Digital_Transformation.pdf
[2] Chui, M.; Manyika, J.; and Miremadi, M. (2016). Four Fundamentals of
Work Automation. Mickensy and Company. http://www.mckin-
sey.com/business-functions/business-technology/our-insights/four-fun-
damentals-of-workplace-automation
[3] Khoshafian, S. (2014). iBPM: The Next Wave. Covers all the various digital
transformative capabilities of intelligent BPM including digitization and
dynamic case management (chapter 9). http://e.pega.com/ibpms
[4] Khoshafian, S. (2015). Digital Transformation through Innovation.
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/digital-transformation-through-innova-
tion-setrag-khoshafian
[5] Khoshafian, S. (2010). Predictive BPM. In 2010 BPM and Workflow Hand-
book, Layna Fischer (ed), 61-71. Cohasset, Massachusetts: Workflow
Management Coalition (WfMC). http://www.futstrat.com/books/hand-
book10.php
[6] Khoshafian, S. (2007). BPM Center of Excellence Manifesto. Published in
2007 BPM and Workflow Handbook. Published in association with the
Workflow Management Coalition (WfMC). Layna Fischer (ed). http://www.
futstrat.com/books/handbook07.php
[7] Khoshafian, S. (2016a). Digital Transformation with Internet of Things in
Intelligent BPM. http://business-process-management.ciore-
view.com/cxoinsight/digital-transformation-with-internet-of-things-in-in-
telligent-bpm-nid-5951-cid-87.html
[8] Khoshafian, S. (2016b) Work Automation the Impact of IoT and Robot-
ics. http://www.iotglobalnetwork.com/iotdir/2016/02/17/work-auto-
mation-the-impact-of-iot-and-robotics-1035/
[9] Khoshafian, S. (2011). Knowledge Assisted Workers.
http://www.zdnet.com/article/knowledge-assisted-workers/
[10] Davenport, Thomas (2005). Thinking for a Living. Boston, Massachusetts:
Harvard Business School Press.
21
Case Management in
Industry 4.0: ACM and IoT
Nathaniel Palmer, WfMC, USA
INTRODUCTION
The theme of the World Economic Forum (WEF) recently held in Davos, Switzerland
was "Mastering the Fourth Industrial Revolution" recognizing the massive transfor-
mation currently underway, centered on what has been labeled Industry 4.0 and
addressing the confluence of ubiquitous computing through cloud, big data, and
other emergent technologies, but primarily Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the Inter-
net of Things (IoT). The term Industry 4.0 and the concept of the fourth industrial
revolution originates, as illustrated below, from the notion that the industrial revo-
lution represented mans first largescale leverage of mechanical power as a force
multiplier in performing work; the steam engine delivered more power than man or
horse could then do in any practical quantity. The next major transformation sur-
rounded the shift from steam power to electrical power, greatly expanding the role
of worker automation, and the third from which we are now transitioning involving
the first round of computers and robotics integration in the workforce. While it can
be interesting to put boundaries on each revolution, in reality it has been a long-
term evolution. Over time man has evolved innovative ways for leveraging technol-
ogy to perform work in new, more efficient ways.
As was true of previous eras, the 4th revolution represents the continuation of this
evolution. Yet is also true that we are amidst an inflexion point in role of technology
in work, one that blurs the line between things physical and digital. This digital
disruption is an exploding phenomenon where software is increasingly a core part
of physical devices, the things of IoT range from appliances to cars; things which
previously had no connection to the digital world, but today are connected through
cloud and part of daily interaction. Perhaps most notable at the moment are
smartphones and mobile devices, which have nearly overnight have replaced desk-
tops and laptops as our primary means for connecting with the digital world.
22
CASE MANAGEMENT IN INDUSTRY 4.0: ACM AND IOT
23
CASE MANAGEMENT IN INDUSTRY 4.0: ACM AND IOT
24
CASE MANAGEMENT IN INDUSTRY 4.0: ACM AND IOT
generate. This then allows local execution of automated activities based on the rules
and process managed by the BPMS.
This type of intelligent system presents a shift from procedural automation, where
responses are tightly-coupled to specific sensor data thresholds (e.g., a SCADA sys-
tem1 which shuts down a motor when a temperature threshold is breached) to goal-
driven models where processes are defined in terms of specific milestones and out-
comes (goals) and the combination of rules and data are used to dynamically define
the optimal process to achieve them. Such a case is the admission of a patient for
medical treatment, involving input from a host of sources and a large volume of
system-generated data (even if manually transcribed by a human being) the major-
ity of data involved originates from a device, machine or system. Successfully com-
pleting the process requires a super user who, for example, knows not only the
medical protocols to make a successful diagnosis, but also the system protocols
defining where and how to enter and access the appropriate information.
Alternatively, a modern case management system (one built on a platform of BPM)
can far more effectively coordinate the streams of data defining not only the cir-
cumstances of the patient, but also data defining the various resources involved in
delivering care to all patients. This scenario illustrates both why BPMS is the ideal
platform to leverage IoT and how BPM as a platform has necessarily evolved. We
have developed a new high-level framework for illustrating the modern BPMS plat-
form, illustrated in the model below.
1SCADA (Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition) is a system for remote monitoring and
control that operates with coded signals over communication channels (using typically one
communication channel per remote station). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCADA
25
CASE MANAGEMENT IN INDUSTRY 4.0: ACM AND IOT
In the model on the preceding page, at the bottom you see the various access points
we refer to as the event cloud, which pulls in data from a broad set of sources,
ranging from transactional systems, to sensors and things, to human users on
various devices, plus others programmatic interfaces to APIs and external cloud
services. The event cloud is not a physical part of the BPMS platform per se, but
the edge points. Connecting these to the brains of the system is integration mid-
dleware serving as an event capture and delivery pipe for receiving and deliver-
ing event data. Data from the various sources, both internal and external as well
as structured and unstructured, is standardized for event processing.
Event processing (also called Complex Event Process or CEP) is applied to all
data and business events to generate context based on patterns and relationships
among events. In other words, event processing identifies what matters from a
stream of events that may not otherwise be relevant as individual events. Looking
at this through the lens of IoT, it should be immediately clear why this is so im-
portant.
As James Bond author Ian Fleming famously wrote, Once is happenstance. Twice
is coincidence. Three times is enemy action. The frequency and temporal nature
(i.e., timing) of events is critical to the meaning of events in aggregate. Without event
processing, a BPMS or BPM engine cannot distinguish between one or 1,000
events, because each is treated as a single input and would be quickly overwhelmed
in an IoT context.
Leveraging event processing, however, allows meaning to be captured from the
event data generated by sensors and things, as well as other systems and even
human interaction. An illustration of this may be found in the patient care scenario.
There may be business rules in place to take action such as increasing staffing for
the next shift if the number of patients reaches a given threshold, or if the care
involved mandates that more time will be required than originally scheduled. Yet
by the time these circumstances are humanly visible, it may be too late. However,
there are various events that may occur below the threshold that triggers corrective
action that collectively foresees future problems.
For this reason, both event processing and Business Rules Management capabil-
ities are required. Rules allow for goal-driven systems to determine the sequence of
a process based on current context. For example, a BPM system can examine ap-
propriate business rules and other defined policies against the current status of a
process or activity to determine what step should occur next and what information
is required. This is, in fact, a process, yet it is based on a diagnostic procedure that
likely involves applying a combination of policies, procedures, other rules together
with the judgment of healthcare workers. Information discovered in one step can
drastically alter the next set of steps, and in the same way, a change in a patients
status may completely alter the process flow in other ways.
The circumstances that define the patients status are represented within business
rules. The sequence of steps to take, in particular, which step to do next; notably
who should do it and whether or not it has already been done, is managed by the
Process Management component of the BPMS. The process management engine
manages the control flow and sequence flow of the process, and generates tasks
and activities, or specifically initiates these, based on the parameters defined in the
process model.
Event processing, business rules, and process management can be successfully
applied to goal-driven scenarios involving the massive volumes of data generated
through IoT, allowing real-time adaptation based on event patterns and predefined
26
CASE MANAGEMENT IN INDUSTRY 4.0: ACM AND IOT
policies and procedures. Yet by widening the aperture of addressable data with IoT,
the number of possible permutations and considerations can quickly overwhelm
the ability to make optimal decisions. As stated earlier, the volume of data generated
by sensors and things is growing incalculably high. To truly leverage data-driven
resource optimization factoring all the event data in IoT scenarios requires a fourth
component: Goal-Seeking Optimization.
The value of IoT is not simply the data generated, but how that data can be made
actionable. With sensors and other data-generating devices, we can have a real-
time or even temporal understanding of resources and constraints. The ability to
optimally organize these is the core advantage of IoT. For example, imagine deliver-
ing 1,000 unique shipments to 300 customers with 15 trucks and three ware-
houses in the fastest period of time. This goal is a lot easier to meet when all of
these actors can communicate their circumstances, not just once but over time as
circumstances change and externalities such as traffic and other factors are pre-
sented. Having access to this data is critical, but it is of little value without an al-
gorithmic way to solve complex scheduling and resource optimization problems.
Is this case management? Yes, it is ACM specifically it is supporting adaptive,
data-driven process by empowering knowledge workers to know in real-time what
is happening at the edge points, and to take actions through the combination of
rule-driven guidance and their own know-how. It is not a traditionally-automated
system but intelligent automation, the hallmark of Industry 4.0 where technology
doesnt merely replace human decision-making but extends the reach of the
knowledge worker; making IoT data actionable. In the above scenario the logistics
analyst plays a role similar to the head nurse scheduling patients and resources,
or insurance claims analyst, all of whom apply their own domain knowledge yet
work with guard rails of policies and rules, facilitated by a system which proac-
tively manages and guides their work, freeing them from the burden of tracking
data, as well as the often-impossible task (for a human brain) of calculating optimal
schedules and resource combinations.
What about the truck drivers? Well, this is Industry 4.0 were talking about, so of
course, theyre drones coordinated by the BPMS (offered only half in jest).
AI as an ACM Interface
If there is any single concept of Industry 4.0 that is the subject of more speculation
and debate than IoT and automation, it is AI. Yet lost in the consternation over
machines run amok ala HAL 9000 is the more realistic and powerful notion of AI
as an interface. Specifically, think of user interaction with business processes as
conversations with bots rather than traditional human tasks delivered through a
worklist metaphor.
Heres what it might look like A new task has emerged which requires your at-
tention. An alert is sent to you via the medium that makes the most sense for this
task; lets keep simple for the moment and simply say via email. The bot, lets call
her Amy, parses and summarizes the task, and asks for response. In one case, it
may be an exception that requires approval and in the summary, Amy includes the
context from the decision logic (e.g., business rules) that outline why this is, in fact,
an exception to standard, straight-through processing.
In another scenario, Amy may ask you to review a document, then either approve
or deny specific circumstances. In the very near future (albeit already possible to-
day) another bot will have already read the document and passed the summary
along to Amy complete with rule-driven conclusions and recommended actions,
such as potentially-suspect information requiring further examination. In both
27
CASE MANAGEMENT IN INDUSTRY 4.0: ACM AND IOT
cases, you need only respond in a natural language statement as you would any
assistant, which may be as simply as approved yet more likely you will actually
converse with Amy such as requesting additional documentation, escalating the
work to another queue, or reassigning the work to a colleague.
Here is how this might play out in an expanded use case. An application is received
and decision logic is applied to verify completeness and eligibility. The case folder
for the application contains all the relevant details (e.g., the application itself and
associated application metadata) including the results of the decision logic applied
the rules that establish whether or not the application meets the criteria for ap-
proval as-is or (more likely) whether additional information is required. Up to this
point it is largely an automated process; the application is received, processed, re-
viewed and an initial assessment can be rendered. Yet this complete set of infor-
mation is not necessarily only for basic interactions; it needs to be managed within
the case, but most likely is more cumbersome to present all at once.
In other words; show just me just what I need to know and I will decide what infor-
mation I need to render a decision, as long as you can assure me it has been read,
validated, and what judgments I need to make.
Also note that we havent yet stated what kind of application and it largely doesnt
matter, because up to this point, the same basic steps would be required (albeit
with different rules and decision logic) whether it was for a mortgage, credit card,
business loan, health insurance, or another type of application. In any of these
cases, the validation of the completeness of information and general determination
of acceptability should already be defined within the process and rules, and this is
managed by the underlying BPMS. Yet the interaction is managed by a bot or cog
which can communicate the salient points to me conversationally, and extract from
my response the discrete data points needed by the BPMS. The interface should
not prescribe how work is performed, nor should the interface be tightly coupled to
the task itself.
AI can bridge the gap by interacting with the work management system, in the
same manner in which a human assistant can intermediate between the busy ex-
ecutive who needs most often just details, as well as the ability to ask questions to
further drill down, or to be told when something requires their undivided attention.
This highlights a critical principal for both the future of software, and perhaps more
notably the charter for ACM: to re-envision the structure of the task to be not a single,
discrete unit of work, and to remove the distinction between what supports a task
and the task itself.
Lets revisit the original assumption that this is all done via email. Certainly some
tasks can be performed via voice commands, just as the currently common exam-
ple of a banks fraud detection system by calling a customer directly to verify the
legitimacy of credit card transactions. Not all work can be done, however, via voice
prompt, text or email, or through an interface of a connected car or wearable device.
Many tasks can be thus done and the ability to have work truly follow the worker,
for both convenience and expediency, underscores the value of separating how
work is performed from the work itself.
Do we have to interact with AI on a first-name basis and why Amy? Yes, most
likely we will interact with bots as people, calling them by name and often without
clear distinction whether they are human or cog. Amy, or Amy Ingram (get it? AI)
is the AI-powered personal assistant for scheduling meetings, which I have re-
cently been beta testing for x.ai a startup focused (currently) on just that one
function. Amy passes the Turing test and even has her own LinkedIn profile. Unlike
28
CASE MANAGEMENT IN INDUSTRY 4.0: ACM AND IOT
Siri, Amy does just one thing (schedules meetings) and does it very well, more pleas-
antly than any other meeting scheduler I can recall. Shes not big on small talk, but
she can parse the conversation to extract the details of a potential meeting by being
copied on email, reaching out to all parties whenever the topic of a meeting occurs.
It (she) is not a standalone system but an active participant, yet the calendar, the
email, the function of work management remains in the systems of record. Just as
it would work as a BPM interface, the AI is merely an abstraction of the underlying
applications. It leaves the core systems intact but greatly simplifies the interaction
as conversations, proactively chasing down the other participants and asking qual-
ifying questions until the work is successfully completed, based on criteria defined
within configurable rules.
THE INTERFACE IS THINGS, NOT A THING: WHY THE INTERFACE MATTERS MORE WITH IOT
As disruptive as smartphones and the emergence of mobile platforms have been to
software design, the impact of IoT and Industry 4.0 will inevitably be far greater
and happen far faster, on a scale of many orders of magnitude more than with
mobility alone. With mobility, there has been essentially a single new digital inter-
face, or form factor content, but the mobile app has been replaced by full-sized
application UI as the primary access point. IoT and the broader spectrum of Indus-
try 4.0 represents the emergence of many new access points and patterns of inter-
action, from intelligent connected devices to AI cogs, to connected cars and social
robots, to other new devices yet to hit the market but soon to become common
within our homes and businesses.
It is not only conceivable, but inevitable, that we are going to see a massive dema-
terialization of the user interface to our core systems. Industry 4.0 requires rethink-
ing what the task look like, to remove the distinction between what supports a task
and the task itself. This is literally what ACM was made for; to allow knowledge
workers to work in the manner and environments that suit them best, at the mo-
ment that work is performed.
And there may not be an app for that; this may, in fact, be the beginning of the end
of the smartphone. Consider the prediction made by Ericssons ConsumerLab late
last year that within five years, smartphones will be obsolete. Sound ridiculous?
Given the growth of smartphones over the last decade, it may seem far-fetched. Yet
their reasoning is sound, and is based, not on speculation, but their own consum-
ers feedback. Half of the study's respondents stated that they expect to be able to
interact with objects without the need for a phone or tablet because phones and
tablets are merely clumsy intermediaries. They have been convenient in the ab-
sence of other things but increasingly, we will interact with specialized devices
and the more fit-for-purpose interfaces they offer. Our systems need to be able to
anticipate that the interface will no longer be represented by a single thing, but by
many things. This is the promise of ACM in the age of Industry 4.0 a challenge of
adaptability to ACM is best equipped to answer.
29
Appendix
Author Appendix
Full Book Overview
Additional Reading
30
Author Appendix
LAYNA FISCHER
Publisher, Future Strategies Inc., USA, Future Strategies Inc., USA
Ms Fischer is Editor-in-Chief and Publisher at Future Strategies Inc., who are also
the official publishers to WfMC.org. She was also Executive Director of WfMC and
BPMI (now merged with OMG) and continues to work closely with these
organizations to promote industry awareness of emerging technologies explaining
the how and why they will impact enterprises of all sizes.
Future Strategies Inc. (www.FutStrat.com) publishes unique books and papers on
business process management, business architecture and more. As such, the
company contracts, and works closely, with individual authors and corporations
worldwide and also directs the renowned annual awards for Excellence in BPM and
Workflow and the Adaptive Case Management.
Ms. Fischer was a senior editor of a leading international computer publication for
four years and has been involved in international computer journalism and
publishing for over 20 years.
SANDY KEMSLEY
BPM architect and industry analyst, Kemsley Design Ltd, Canada
Ms Kemsley is an independent analyst and application architect specializing in
business process management and the social enterprise. She has a 25-year history
of software design and systems architecture in several technology areas, combined
with a deep understanding of business environments and how technology impacts
them. She has founded and run three companies a systems integration services
company, a software product company, and her current consulting company and
held the position of BPM evangelist for a major BPM vendor.
Currently, Ms Kemsley practices as a BPM industry analyst and process architect,
performing engagements for end-user organizations and BPM vendors. She writes
the popular Column 2 BPM blog at www.column2.com and is a featured
conference speaker on BPM and digital transformation. She is the 2016 recipient
of the Marvin L. Manheim Award For Significant Contributions in the Field of
Workflow.
Ms Kemsley holds a BASc in Systems Design Engineering from the University of
Waterloo.
SETRAG KHOSHAFIAN
Chief Evangelist and VP of BPM Technology, Pegasystems Inc., USA
Dr. Setrag Khoshafian is one of the industrys pioneers and recognized experts in
Digital Enterprises, especially Digital Transformation through IoT, Evolved CRM
and intelligent BPM. He has been a senior executive in the software industry for
the past 25 years, where he has invented, architected, and steered the production
of several enterprise software products and solutions. Currently, he is Pegas Chief
Evangelist and strategic IoT & BPM technology thought leader involved in
numerous technology, thought leadership, marketing, alliance, and customer
initiatives. The majority of his time is spent with Fortune 500 companies,
specifically on their transformational journeys leveraging digital technologies
(especially digital transformation, IoT, agility & process improvement through
Pega). Previously he was the Senior VP of Technology at Savvion where he invented
31
AUTHOR APPENDIX
and led the development of the worlds first web centric BPM platform. He was a
senior architect at Ashton-Tate where he invented Intelligent SQL, and previously
an OODBMS researcher at MCC, where he invented several object databases
technologies. Dr. Khoshafian is a frequent speaker and presenter at international
workshops and conferences. He is the lead author of more than 10 books and more
than 50 publications in various industry and academic journals.
Dr. Khoshafian holds a PhD in Computer Science from the University of Wisconsin-
Madison. He also holds an MSc in Mathematics.
NATHANIEL PALMER
Executive Director, WfMC, USA
Rated as the #1 Most Influential Thought Leader in Business Process Management
(BPM) by independent research, Nathaniel is recognized as one of the early
originators of BPM, and has the led the design for some of the industrys largest-
scale and most complex projects involving investments of $200 Million or more.
Today he is the Editor-in-Chief of BPM.com, as well as the Executive Director of the
Workflow Management Coalition.
Previously he had been the BPM Practice Director of SRA International, and prior
to that Director, Business Consulting for Perot Systems Corp, as well as spent over
a decade with Delphi Group serving as VP and CTO. He frequently tops the lists of
the most recognized names in his field, and was the first individual named as
Laureate in Workflow. Nathaniel has authored or co-authored a dozen books on
process innovation and business transformation, including Thriving on
Adaptibility (2016) BPM Everywhere (2015) Intelligent BPM (2013), How
Knowledge Workers Get Things Done (2012), Social BPM (2011), Mastering the
Unpredictable (2008) which reached #2 on the Amazon.com Best Sellers List,
Excellence in Practice (2007), Encyclopedia of Database Systems (2007) and
The X-Economy (2001).
He has been featured in numerous media ranging from Fortune to The New York
Times to National Public Radio. Nathaniel holds a DISCO Secret Clearance as well
as a Position of Trust with in the U.S. federal government.
PAUL ROECK
BPM/DCM Adoption(CC) Services, Pegasystems Inc., USA
Paul Roeck is a 15-year industry veteran who brings deep experience in how
organizations should adopt Pega at the enterprise level. As part of the Pega
Consulting leadership team, his focus is on helping organizations develop Centers
of Excellence which is a key step in enterprise Pega adoption. Paul holds a BA in
Management and Administration from Barat College of DePaul University and a
Masters of Science Project Management from George Washington University.
32
Complete Book Overview
Best Practices for Knowledge Workers
Innovation in Adaptive Case Management
Best Practices for Knowledge Workers describes ACM in the current era of digitiza-
tion, Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence (AI), intelligent BPMS and BPM
Everywhere. You will learn how support of adaptive, data-driven processes empow-
ers knowledge workers to know in real-time what is happening at the edge points,
and to take actions through the combination of rule-driven guidance and their own
know-how. It is not a traditionally-automated system but intelligent automation,
where technology doesnt merely replace human decision-making but extends the
reach of the knowledge worker; making IoT data actionable.
As Sandy Kemsley points out in her foreword:
As adaptive case management (ACM) systems mature, we are moving beyond
simple systems that allow knowledge workers to define ad hoc processes, to
creating more intelligent systems that support and guide them. Knowledge
workers still need to dynamically add information, define activities and col-
laborate with others in order to get their work done, but those are now just
the table stakes in a world of big data and intelligent agents. To drive innova-
tion and maintain operational efficiencies, we need to augment case work
typically seen as relying primarily on human intelligence with machine in-
telligence. In other words, we need intelligent ACM.
Highly predictable work is easy to support using traditional programming tech-
niques, while unpredictable work cannot be accurately scripted in advance, and
thus requires the involvement of the knowledge workers themselves. The core ele-
ment of Adaptive Case Management (ACM) is the support for real-time decision-
making by knowledge workers.
In award-winning case studies covering industries as a diverse as law enforcement,
transportation, insurance, banking, state services, and healthcare, you will find
instructive examples for how to transform your own organization.
This important book follows these ground-breaking best-sellers on ACM; Thriving
on Adaptability, Empowering Knowledge Workers, Taming the Unpredictable, How
Knowledge Workers Get Things Done, and Mastering the Unpredictable and provides
important papers by thought-leaders in this field, together with practical examples,
detailed ACM case studies and product reviews.
Purchase: http://bpm-books.com/products/best-practices-to-support-
knowledge-workers-print
33
OVERVIEW OF COMPLETE BOOK
34
OVERVIEW OF COMPLETE BOOK
and business processes; the impact of high wage of occupations; and the future of
creativity and meaning.
CLOUD-ENABLED ACM FOR THE AGE OF THE CUSTOMER
Linus Chow and Casey Conner, Salesforce; Sherry Comes, Genpact; Jin-Lin
Mei and Tom Bullotta, Acumen Solutions
We live in a customer-driven era where technology is evolving around the way con-
sumers think, communicate, work and purchase. In this digital world, customers
expect all of their technology to be easy-to-use, modern, and connected. Customers
expect consistent and high-value in-person and digital experiences. They value a
deep understanding of who they are and the anticipation of their needs.
Adaptive Case Management (ACM) use cases are driven to meet this higher expec-
tation. Organizations are forced to transform their legacy systems and processes to
a knowledge-based architecture that can be dynamic, variable and unstructured.
Successful transformation is the difference between a thriving business or extinc-
tion. Thankfully, the same forces changing the customer's expectations have also
produced new cloud capabilities that can provide a system of engagement layer to
keep pace with customer demands. Welcome to the Age of the Customer!
THE AGILE AND STRATEGIC HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICE
William A. Brantley, University of Maryland, United States
Human Resources] is under increasing pressure from business leaders to drive
innovative talent solutions, improve alignment with business imperatives, and turn
data into actionable insights. (Deloitte 2016)
According to the Deloitte 2016 Human Capital Trends report, HR is becoming more
strategic and innovative. Even so, there is still much more work to be done. The
greatest imperative for organizations today is being agile as their environment be-
comes more Volatile, Uncertain, Ambiguous, and Complex (VUAC).
This chapter explains that, by adopting adaptive case management (ACM) and So-
cial Business Process Management (SBPM), HR will become more agile and strate-
gic in its functions and processes. Adopting ACM and SBPM can greatly help the
overall organization become agile and better confront the challenges of a VUAC en-
vironment.
VALUE STREAMS EMPOWERING THE KNOWLEDGE WORKER
Kerry Finn, Stephanie Ramsay and J. Bryan Lail, Raytheon, U.S.
Improving profit margins in a globally-competitive environment is tied explicitly to
the challenge of managing knowledge workers. Over the past two decades, inten-
tional management of knowledge has played an important role in designing prod-
ucts and services line that have fundamentally changed the industry (e.g. aca-
demia, defense, banking, and publishing). Many companies failed to realize the full
benefits, however, because they focused too narrowly on functionally-siloed tools
and methods to make decisions and transfer information while lacking key social,
organizational, purpose, processes, innovation and context needed to enable and
support knowledge workers.
We will address a local business example and an enterprise-wide example in our
company of this living value-stream approach. The work has the potential to build
off value stream and capability standards just published by the Business Architec-
ture Guild to provide a case study for the Aerospace and Defense industry.
35
OVERVIEW OF COMPLETE BOOK
36
OVERVIEW OF COMPLETE BOOK
client has spread its operations across seven regions including the Head Office at
Lagos, Nigeria. The solution combined BPM, ECM and has Case Management func-
tionality baked into it and hence each participant within the process flow was em-
powered as a Knowledge worker. The Users could easily take on ad-hoc develop-
ments on each document.
EATON VANCE INVESTMENT MANAGERS, USA
Nominated by EMC Corporation, USA
Founded in 1924 and one of the oldest investment management firms in the United
States, Eaton Vance offers individuals and institutions a broad array of investment
strategies and wealth management solutions.
Eaton Vance has a long-standing reputation as a leading developer of creative strat-
egies with strong investment merit. The ability to anticipate the evolving needs of
investors and meet them with timely innovations continues to be a hallmark of the
organization. The company deployed an automated technology solution to stream-
line and accelerate its new account opening and account change processes. Spear-
headed by the legal and investment operations groups, the solution aimed to in-
crease efficiency, reduce costs, ensure compliance with industry regulations, and
increase revenue.
EDP RENEWABLES, UNITED STATES
Nominated by Appian, United States
EDP Renewables North America (EDPR NA), a developer, owner, and operator of
wind farms and solar parks, is one of the largest renewable energy companies in
the United States. The company decided that embracing Dynamic Case Manage-
ment would give it a competitive advantage in overall process management against
its industry competitors. EDPR NA designed the COBRA (short for COllaBoRA-
tion) system using a Business Process Management (BPM) platform comprised of
process, rules, events and analytics capabilities, combined with native mobility and
social business collaboration.
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES (NIAID), USA
Nominated by OpenText Corporation, Canada
As part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the National Institute of Allergy
and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) is responsible for biomedical research on infectious
diseases. Much of NIAIDs research budget is used to fund research by external
organizations. To support rapid modernization across the organizationnot just
isolated, department-level solutionsNIAID implemented a platform for electronic
document management and process automation. NIAID has successfully used its
platform in more than 50 projects, building and reusing application components to
quickly streamline varied processes across the institute. As a result, NIAID has
significantly increased the efficiency of its grants and awards processes as well as
its internal operations. Reviews and approvals that once took weeks to complete
are now finished in just a few days.
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, USA
Nominated by Vega ECM Solutions, USA
The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) was created by Congress
in 1974 to ensure the safe use of radioactive materials while protecting both people
as well as the environment. The NRC regulates commercial nuclear power plants
37
OVERVIEW OF COMPLETE BOOK
and other uses of nuclear materials, such as in nuclear medicine, through licens-
ing, inspection and enforcement of its requirements.
The NRC designed and developed an Adaptive Case Management framework that
could be utilized agency wide to harmonize information and business processes.
The framework that was developed is called the Business Process Automation
Stack (BPAS) and is used across the NRC for a variety of different Case Manage-
ment use cases by a diverse user community.
PEDIATRIC HOSPITAL BAMBINO GES KIDNEY TRANSPLANT INTEGRATED CARE PATHWAY
Nominated by Openwork Srl, Italy
More than 20 kidney transplants are performed every year at Bambino Ges Pedi-
atric Hospital (OPBG), the largest pediatric hospital and research center in Europe
and one of the highest-qualified pediatric centers in the world, with over 200 pa-
tients to be monitored with a rigorous post-transplant Integrated Clinical Pathway
(ICP) managed by a multidisciplinary clinical team. In the Bambino Ges Pediatric
Hospital context, we are dealing with children, a vulnerable population that require
a range of additional, coordinated, high-quality, child- and family-centered support
services. The project uses a BPM platform to develop and deploy the ICP for trans-
planted children by mapping the ICP onto BPM platform to support the imple-
mentation of best practice already successful adopted at Kidney Transplant De-
partment at OPBG.
PENSCO TRUST COMPANY, USA
Nominated by PENSCO Trust Company, USA
Many individual investors would love to use their retirement savings to purchase
non-publicly traded, alternative assets in todays economic environment, but the
complexity of administering these assets has caused many financial institutions to
opt out of offering them as part of their investment platform. As a regulated banking
company since 1989, PENSCO Trust has been one of a relatively small number of
leading retirement account custodians that permit financially savvy, self-directed
individual retirement account (IRA) owners to invest in alternative assets.
In this case study, we share the story of our production case management imple-
mentation of what is known at PENSCO as the Alternative Assets Deal Console, the
foundation of a constellation of systems that work together to support the critical
work of the Alternative Assets Deal Consultant.
Win an Award for your Case Management project
The WfMC Awards for Case Management are the ideal way to be recognized by the
industry worldwide, to publicly acknowledge and recognize the efforts of your team
and to inject passion into your case management projects.
Get recognized for your vision and your team's superb efforts by entering
the Global Excellence Awards
Co-sponsored by WfMC and BPM.com, these prestigious awards recognize user or-
ganizations worldwide that have demonstrably excelled in implementing innovative
Case Management solutions. These awards are designed to highlight the best ex-
amples of technology to support knowledge workers. We work with leading industry
analysts such as Forrester and Gartner who use these case studies to analyze ACM
technology users and suppliers, illustrate trends, industry growth, ROI and more.
Read more about the Awards here: http://adaptivecasemanagement.org
38
MoreReadingandResources
Introduction to BPM and Workflow
e-Book Series http://bpm-books.com/products/ebook-series-introduction-to-
$9.97 each bpm-and-workflow
Download PDF and Financial Services
http://bpm-books.com/products/ebook-series-financial-ser-
start reading NOW.
vices
Retail $25.00 Healthcare
http://bpm-books.com/products/ebook-series-bpm-in-
healthcare
Utilities and Telecommunications
http://bpm-books.com/products/ebook-series-utilities-and-
telecommunications
BPM EVERYWHERE
Internet of Things, Process of Everything
http://bpm-books.com/products/bpm-everywhere-print
Critical issues currently face BPM adopters and practitioners,
such as the key roles played by process mining uncovering en-
gagement patterns and the need for process management plat-
forms to coordinate interaction and control of smart devices.
BPME represents the strategy for leveraging, not simply surviv-
ing but fully exploiting the wave of disruption facing every busi-
ness over the next 5 years and beyond.
Retail $59.95
39
FURTHER READING AND RESEARCH
40
FURTHER READING AND RESEARCH
41
FURTHER READING AND RESEARCH
Social BPM
http://futstrat.com/books/handbook11.php
Work, Planning, and Collaboration Under the Impact of Social Technology
Today we see the transformation of both the look and feel of
BPM technologies along the lines of social media, as well as the
increasing adoption of social tools and techniques democratiz-
ing process development and design. It is along these two trend
lines; the evolution of system interfaces and the increased en-
gagement of stakeholders in process improvement, that Social
BPM has taken shape.
Retail $59.95 (see discount offer on website)
PublishedbyFutureStrategiesInc.
http://bpmbooks.com
42
Special Edition
Digital Transformation
Competency Centers
Dr. Setrag Khoshafian and Paul Roeck
Pegasystems Inc.