F3-M&E Form 6:

Program Completion Report Template

Program Tile: District Semestral INSERVICE TRAINING

Facilitator(s):
Mrs. Virginia D. Tubio
Mrs. Alma F. Alanano
Mrs. Queenie E. Butalid
Mr. Fernando T. Reyes
Mr. Wee Wyn C. Elnas
Dr. Charmaine B. Jainar
Mr. Henry Tubog
Mrs. Anatolia S. Delmo
Mrs. Mayflor Tuble
Mrs. Fructuosa Villegas
Mrs. Lucena Truno
Mrs. Rosario B. Cid
Mr. Wilson Avanzado
Mr. Jesus A. Alap ap MT I
District Supervisor
ESP-I, Central School Principal
ESP-I, T & D District Com. Chair
ESP-I, T & D District Com. Mem.
ESP-I, T & D District Com. Mem.
ESP-I, Malongcay Elem. Sc
ESP-I, Mag aso Elem. Sch.
ESP-I, Maayongtubig Elem. Sch.
ESP-I, Baslay Elem. Sch.
HT III, Casile Elem. Sch.
HT2, Tugawe Elem. Sch.
MT I
MT I

Location and Dauin Central School, Dauin District, Dauin Negros Oriental
venue:

Duration: 2 Day Live-Out equivalent to 16 Face-to Face Training hours JEL

Component

Date: October 30-31,2013

No. of
Participants: Male ____ Female _____ Total _____

Attendance List: See attached list

Program At the end of the program the participants will have

Objectives:
gained knowledge on DEPEDs Vision, Mission and Core
Values
Revisited the K-12 Assessment and Grading System
demonstrated skills in automated grading system
valued the importance of knowledge on Disaster Risk
Preparedness, Reduction and Prevention
 applied skills on digitization of localized Instructional
Materials through JEL Activities in the next five months

Program
Schedule:
SCHEDULE ACTIVITY PERSONS
RESPONSIBLE
DAY I ( October 30, 2013)
7:30-8:00 Registration and Checking of Attendance Mayflor Tuble, ESP-I
Baslay ES
8:00-8:30 Opening Program by FRUCTOUSA VILLEGAS
Head Teacher III
I. SALUTE TO THE NATION Casile Elementary School

II. PRAYER by HENRY TUBOG

School Principal I
Mag-aso Elementary School

by FRUCTOUSA VILLEGAS
III. TOWN HYMN Head Teacher III
Casile Elementary School

IV. WELCOME MESSAGE by ALMA A. ALANANO

School Principal I
Dauin Central School

V. PRESENTATION OF
by FERNANDO REYES
PARTICIPANTS/ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
School Principal I
OF FACILITATORS, VISITORS AND Masaplod Elementary School
WORKING COMMITTEE

VI. INSPIRATIONAL MESSAGE by VIRGINIA D. TUBIO

PSDS, DAUIN DISTRICT

VII. RATIONALE & OBJECTIVES by QUEENIE E. BUTALID

School Principal I
Bulak Elementary School

8:30-9:30 Levelling of Expectations and House Rules By Team Leaders

9:30-10:30 Plenary I: DepEd Vision, Mission & Core TEAM A
by ALMA A. ALANANO
Values School Principal I
Dauin Central School
TEAM B.
By Dr. Charmaine B. Jainar
School Principal I
Malongcay Elem. School
10:30-12:00 Plenary 2: Revisitation of K to 12 TEAM A
by QUEENIE E. BUTALID
Assessment & Grading Sysytem via School Principal I
Automation using Excel Program Bulak Elementary School
TEAM B
Mr. Jesus Alap-ap
Master Teacher I
DAuin Central School

12:00-1:30 Lunch Break

1:30-3:00 Plenary 3: Disaster Risk Preparation, TEAM A
Mr. Wilson Avanzado
Reduction and Prevention Master Teacher I/ TIC
Magsaysay Elem. Sch.

Mrs. Anatolia Delmo

ESP-I
Maayongtubig Elem. Sch.
TEAM B
Mr. Wee Wyn C. Elnas
School Principal I
Panubtuban Elem. Sch.
3:00-3:15 Break
3:15-5:00 Plenary 4: Digitization and Indigenization of TEAM A
By: Mayflor Tuble
Curriculum School Principal I
Baslay Elem. School
TEAM B

DAY 2: ( October 31, 2013)

8:00-8:30 MOL Big Group
8:30-12:00 Workshop: Expected output ( 4) All Team
12:00-1:30 Lunch Break
1:30-3:00 Continuation of Workshop All Team
3:00-3:15 Break
3:15-4:15 Gallery Walk showcasing of Output All Team
4:15-5:00 Closing Activity Big Group

Key Results:
Drew out Learning Expectations
Came up with House Rules using Survey Questionnaire.
Gained knowledge on DEPEDs Vision, Mission and Core Values
Enriched skills in automation of grading system
Discussed issues regarding Disaster Risk Preparedness,
Reduction and Prevention
Accomplished digitized local made Instructional Materials
Accomplished JEL Contract
 Accomplished M & E Forms
F3-M&E Form 5: Trainees End of the Program Assessment
F3-M&E Form 3: End of the Program Assessments
Resources/ Materials:
Resource package on Automation of Grading System
Templates for M&E Forms
JEL Contract
Power Point Presentations
Meta Cards
Pieces of Cartolina
Pentel Pens
Pair of Scissors
Masking Tapes

M & E Analysis
Results from the participants evaluation of the
program
Based on the F3-M&E Form 6 on consolidation of the trainees
End of the F3 Program Assessment, 129 participants out of 129
participants or 100% had accomplished the F3-M&E Form 3:
End of the Program Assessment. They gave an overall mean
rating of 3.36 interpreted as Agree for both the application of
new knowledge and skills gained from the Formal Face to Face
(F3) Training and the confidence to implement the JEL Contract.

For Item A on Program Planning/ Management/ Preparation, the

participants gave an overall rating of 3.43 (Agree ), in which the
delivery as planned gained a rating of 3.47 (Agree) , on
efficiency of managing the program gained 3.40 (Agree) and on
how the program was structured gained a rating of 3.43.

For Item B on Attainment of Objectives, the participants gave an

overall rating of 3.42 interpreted as Agree, in which the
participants rated 3.46 (Agree) for the clear presentation of
program objectives, 3.40 (Agree) on the logical arrangement of
session objectives, and 3.41 (Agree ) on the attainment of
program and session objectives.

For Item C on Delivery of the Program Content, the participants

gave an overall rating of 3.41 interpreted as Agree, in which the
participants rated 3.49 (Agree) on its appropriateness to trainees
roles and responsibilities, 3.42 (Agree) on content delivery which
was based on authoritative and reliable sources, 3.46 (Agree) on
the presentation on new learning, 3.37 (Agree) on the
effectiveness of session activities in generating learning, 3.37
(Agree) on the effective use of adult learning methodologies,
3.36 (Agree) on the structure of the management of learning e.g.
synthesis of previous learning.

For Item D on Trainees Learning, the participants gave an

overall rating of 3.46 interpreted as Agree, in which the
participants rated 3.50 (Agree) on the encouragement of how
ideas and skills gained during the training could be incorporated
into their own practices, 3.53 (Agree) on their contributions
were taken into account regardless of gender, 3.35 (Agree) on
demonstration of clear understanding of the content delivered.

For Item E on Trainers Conduct of Sessions, the participants

gave an overall rating of 3.43 interpreted as Agree, in which the
participants rated 3.40 on evidences of trainers competencies
during the conduct of the sessions, 3.47 (Agree) on manifestation
of teamwork among trainers and staff, 3.43 (Agree) on trainers
establishment of positive learning environment, 3.41 (Agree) on
maintenance of trainees interest while activities transitioned.

For Item F, on Provision of Support Materials, the participants

gave an overall rating of 3.47 interpreted as Agree, in which the
participants rated 3.53 (Agree) on how the training materials
were clear and useful for them, 3.41(Agree) on power point
presentations as a support to the flow of the sessions, 3.47
(Agree) on the appropriateness of resources to trainees needs.

For Item G, on Program Management Team, the participants gave

an overall rating of 3.50 interpreted as Agree, in which the
participants rated 3.51 on courteousness of Program Management
Team, 3.49 ( Agree) on effectiveness of Program Management
Team, 3.50 (Agree) on the responsiveness to the needs of trainees
of the Program Management Team.

For Item H, on the Venue and Accommodation, the participants

gave an overall rating of 2.90 interpreted as Disagree, however
certain conditions were taken into considerations knowing that
global warming is highly affecting the venue of this training even
how much the host is trying to give comfort to the trainees. For
the purpose of reporting, individual ratings of the sub items under
this component, the participants rated 2.63 (Disagree) on the
lightings and ventilations, 2.70 (Disagree) on the sufficiency of
space for program activities, 3.10 (Agree) on the sanitary and
 hygienic conditions of the venue, 2.95 (Disagree) on how
nutritious and sufficient meals are in terms of quantity and
quality, 3.13 (Agree) on accommodation which made the
participants comfortable because of its sanitary and hygienic
conditions.

For item I, on Overall Impact of this training, the participants

gave an overall rating of 3.44 interpreted as Agree, in which the
participants rated 3.49 (Agree) on having assimilated knowledge
and skills to apply new learning and 3.38 (Agree) on having the
confidence in implementing the JEL Contract.

Results from the facilitators review of the program

Results from the Program Managers review of the

Program

Strengths
Strong Support from the T&D Committee
Technical Support from Program Managers
Responsive Participants
Committed and competent facilitators
Availability of equipment and training materials
Collaboration and teamwork among the T&D team
and other personnel
Areas for improvement
Time management in conducting training
In-depth KSAs of Facilitators in the focused competency
Conduciveness of the venue
Availability of M&E Team
General Comments
and Issues Encountered
Delivery during the F3 Phase
- Trainers/Facilitators
Trainers/Facilitators mastered their sessions using
the 4As approach in facilitating learning to the
trainees. The content, activities and delivery strategies
were generally effective and successful as revealed in
the F3-M&E 3: Trainees End of the Assessment.
Process observers were handled by the co-facilitators
who served as F3 M&E team.
 - Participants
There was 100% participation in the targeted
participants during the actual delivery of the 16 hours
Face-to-Face training. Generally, the participants
KSAs on assessment process were enhanced.

- Content of the Program

The content of the program outlined four topics as
reflected in the Plenaries; Plenary I: DepEd Vision,
Mission & Core Values,Plenary 2: Revisitation of K
to 12 Assessment & Grading Sysytem via Automation
using Excel Program, Plenary 3: Disaster Risk
Preparation, Reduction and Prevention,Plenary 4:
Digitization and Indigenization of Curriculum

A Job-Embedded Learning (JEL) component

equivalent to 5 months is structured as a part of the
program. This enables each trainee to apply new
learning from the training to their respective learning
areas.
- Delivery Strategies
The learning activities during the 16 hour Face to face
Training Program follow the andragogical principles.
The strategies follow the learning approach using the
4As: Activity, Analysis, Abstraction, and Application:

Preliminary Activity was done to introduce the session

content. Plenary sessions served as a warm-up activity
to give the trainees appetite for the incoming sessions
of the day.

Concluding Activity is a brief but effective closing

activity that inspires the participants to do something
to practice their new learnings.

- Training Materials
All the necessary resources and training materials
were readily available during the delivery of the
program.
Management during the F3 Phase
- Prior to delivery
The preparation of all the necessary resources,
materials and the like was collaborately done.
 Walkthrough of the sessions was held with the
Program Managers. Power Point Presentations were
refined and finalized.

- During the delivery F3 Phase

The program delivery was managed by the District
T&D Team composed of Mrs. Queenie E. Butalid,as
Chairman Mr. Fernando T. Reyes and Mr. Wee Wyn C.
Elnas as Committe. Members and Program Managers,
composed of Mrs. Virginia D. Tubio as overall
Manager and Mrs. Alma F. Alanano as Co Manager/
District-In-Charge in lieu of the sick PSDS.

The sessions were equally prorated to all School

Heads with Designations and MTs, co-facilitated by
TICs. They took turn in running the sessions

For the Management of Learning (MOL), participants

were organized into Two (2) Team. Each team was
assigned to a specific day to manage the days
activities to support the training team.
Recommendations
Other school heads should also be given the chance to
design and implement trainings so they would be
equipped with program designing skills thereby enhancing
their implementation skills in delivering a
program/training.
Experts from the TEIs and other stakeholders should be
invited to cope with the quality of the program being
delivered.
Program Report Attachments
Attachment 1: Program Attendance List
Grade
No. Names Position Day 1 Day 2
Handled
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
Attachment 2. Program Schedule of Activities
Program Schedule Matrix

The program developed in this two day training contains:

a. Management of Learning (MOL) and plenary sessions to be done in the morning a

day after the opening program before the actual conduct of the sessions
The following topics are delivered in the plenary sessions:

Day I: Plenaries

Plenary I: DepEd Vision, Mission & Core Values

Plenary 2: Revisitation of K to 12 Assessment & Grading System via Automation
using Excel Program
Plenary 3: Disaster Risk Preparation, Reduction and Prevention
Plenary 4: Digitization and Indigenization of Curriculum

Day II: Workshop on the following

a. Production of Big Books using Microsoft Office and Printer

b. Automation of Grading Sheets using Microsoft Excel
c. Preparation of Survival Kit
d. Production of DepEd Vision, Mission and Core Values using Microsoft Office

b. Debriefing will follow each days session

Prepared by:

QUEENIE E. BUTALID
School Principal I
T & D, Chairman

Noted:

VIRGINIA D. TUBIO
District Supervisor
Dauin District