Sei sulla pagina 1di 16

STRATEGIC

ASSET PLAN
D ELI V E RI NG S A FE , S E C URE A ND
SU ST A I NA BL E C O URT A ND TRI BUNA L
ASSET S V I A E X C E L L E NT A ND E X P E RT
ASSET M A NA G E M E NT

2016 2 0 3 1
Court Services Victoria acknowledges the This report may also be downloaded
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people from the Court Services Victoria website
as the Traditional Custodians of the land. www.courts.vic.gov.au
Court Services Victoria also acknowledges and
pays respect to their Elders, past and present. Enquires
Court Services Victoria
This report is protected by copyright. Apart 223 William Street
from any use permitted under the Copyright Act Melbourne Victoria 3000
1968 (Cth), all rights are reserved. Email: feedback@courts.vic.gov.au

Court Services Victoria

Published by Court Services Victoria


Design: Andrew Hogg Design
November 2016

Cover image: Supreme Court of Victoria


Image above: Coroners Court of Victoria
1

CONTENTS

1 THE PURPOSE 2
2 THE VISION 2
3 THE SERVICE PLAN 2
4 THE KEY PRIORITIES 3
5 THE DELIVERY 3
6 THE ENVIRONMENT 3
7 THE STRATEGY 4
8 ACCESSIBLE JUSTICE THROUGHOUT VICTORIA 6
8.1 CBD 6
8.1.1 Issues 6
8.1.2 Opportunities 6
8.2 Metropolitan Melbourne 7
8.2.1 Issues 7
8.2.2 Opportunities 7
8.3 Regional Victoria 9
8.3.1 Issues 9
8.3.2 Opportunities 9

9 FUNDING 10
10 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS 10
11 APPENDICES 12
Appendix 1 Court Services Delineation Model 12

COURT SERVICES VICTORIA STRATEGIC ASSET PLAN


2

1.0 2.0 3.0


THE THE THE
PURPOSE VISION SERVICE PLAN

Delivering safe, secure Court Services Victoria (CSV) aims to The Victorian courts and tribunals operate
enable provision of accessible justice for as an interconnected network in their
and sustainable court all Victorians through a portfolio service delivery across Victoria, from
and tribunal assets via of buildings that are safe, secure and the Melbourne CBD to metropolitan and
excellent and expert sustainable to meet the service needs of regional areas. Demand for court and
asset management. the jurisdictions, court and tribunal users tribunal services across Victoria, driven
and community, now and into the future. primarily by population, is occurring at
different rates meaning that some areas
The guiding principles for delivering this are under significant pressure while other
vision are: areas have little or decreasing demand.
Accessibility to justice in all forms to be
maximised A Court Services Delineation Model
(detailed at Appendix 1) provides a
Safe, sustainable and fit-for-purpose
framework for identifying service
court environments to be provided
provision requirements, location, type and
Technology-enabled solutions to be future need within defined catchments on
incorporated a state-wide basis.
Partnerships with agencies, authorities
The needs of the different jurisdictions
and the community to be sought
vary significantly, particularly between
Existing asset base and capability to be the CBD and metropolitan areas. The
optimised service plan identifies priorities within,
but not between, the CBD, metropolitan
Melbourne, and regional Victoria.

We should be safe and


easy to do business with
across all touch-points
in whatever form

We should be safe and


3

4.0 5.0 6.0


THE KEY THE THE
PRIORITIES DELIVERY ENVIRONMENT

Key areas of focus: CSVs strategy for delivering safe, secure CSVs asset portfolio is diverse and
and sustainable courts and tribunals via geographically spread around Victoria,
Enabling specialist court infrastructure excellent and expert asset management from major buildings in the Precinct
including family violence response is centred on taking a service-driven and metropolitan areas, through to
Ensuring safe, flexible, future proofed strategic approach that is informed and single courtroom facilities dispersed
and fit-for-purpose environments evidence-based. The whole asset lifecycle throughout regional Victoria, with a total
Delivering Melbourne CBD Legal will be considered, with expert capability of 75 buildings. While most properties
Precinct (the Precinct) development gathered on this basis, working in an are Crown-owned and vested in CSV, a
requirements environment of continuous improvement number are leased, either commercially
to ensure that CSVs assets meet the or in arrangements with local councils.
Delivering Melbourne growth corridor
service needs of the Victorian community. The portfolio includes many significant
development priorities
This methodology is detailed in the Asset and heritage-listed courts, many of these
Implementing the Court Services Management Framework. buildings are in poor condition, with
Delineation Model across metropolitan only 16% meeting or exceeding CSVs
and regional Victoria Safe, secure and sustainable courts Building Condition Assessment minimum
Identifying a set of principles that and tribunals will be those that have benchmark.
will determine proper priorities and a systematic program of upgrades to
allocation of resources for new capital ensure that they meet best practice, While leasing properties offers flexibility
works and maintenance of the existing the requirements of the Court Services and efficiency, it is essential that this is
asset base both within and between Delineation Model and the benchmarks done in a strategic manner, with forward
the CBD, metropolitan Melbourne, and that CSV sets in its regular Building planning and a commercial focus to
regional Victoria. Condition Assessment reviews. These are optimise lease outcomes across the
categorised into condition, compliance, portfolio.
functionality and safety. Technology
enablement is a key driver to meeting
these benchmarks and the service needs
of the courts and tribunals.

CSVs asset portfolio


consists of 75 buildings
of which only 16% meet
or exceed CSVs Building
Condition Assessment
minimum benchmark.

COURT SERVICES VICTORIA STRATEGIC ASSET PLAN


4

7.0
THE
STRATEGY

The key recommendations of the The strategy responds to the defined


Strategic Asset Plan are: service needs of all jurisdictions,
incorporating the following components
Build and enhance Victorias network over a 15 year period:
of court and tribunal assets consistent
with the guiding principles to properly Investment in ten new court and
cater for present community need and tribunal facilities
future demand. Expansion of five existing court and
Develop Victorias network of court and tribunal facilities
tribunal assets as one interconnected Upgrade and lifecycle management
system. across the court portfolio
Distribute services to ensure that Accommodating the new Court
provision of access to court and tribunal Services Delineation Model
services is relative to the distribution
Replacing/upgrading critical
and demand from the population.
infrastructure
Implement the Court Services
Increase in recurrent maintenance
Delineation Model (refer Appendix 1) to
funding
ensure equitable and consistent court
services availability and distribution. Divestment of up to thirteen properties
Drive technology-enabled access, Release of up to ten leased properties.
service efficiency and safety for all
parties.
Divest and invest in court and tribunal
assets to optimise the efficiency and
utilisation of buildings in accordance
with the proposed Court Services
Delineation Model.
Ensure flexible use of assets via
leasing, multi-jurisdictional sharing,
co-location and links with local
community.
Develop integrated service delivery
networks and precincts.

COURT SERVICES VICTORIA STRATEGIC ASSET PLAN


5

Childrens Court at Broadmeadows COURT SERVICES VICTORIA STRATEGIC ASSET PLAN


6

8.0
ACCESSIBLE JUSTICE
THROUGHOUT VICTORIA
8.1 CBD
The Precinct is at the heart of the 8.1.1 Establish the resources required to plan
Victorian courts asset portfolio. The ISSUES and implement the future County Court
majority of the jurisdictions have their Public Private Partnership contract to
Increased service demand in CBD by
state headquarter court located there, ensure appropriate service provision and
26.8% by 2031.
with VCAT and Coroners Court of resources during the next contract phase.
Victoria being the exceptions. The Precinct Constraints in development potential
Prioritise occupation within the
is created by the Victorian courts, in Precinct due to:
Precinct by each jurisdiction (including
plus CSV, the Commonwealth Law Courts, Lack of available undeveloped land VCAT) of central headquarters fit for the
university law schools and multiple legal Lack of future proofing capacity purposes of future service delivery needs.
firms and agencies, including Office of
Cost of development in CBD Optimise CSV owned buildings in the
Public Prosecutions, Commonwealth
Existing heritage building constraints. Precinct via divestment of properties
Director of Public Prosecutions, Victoria
and leases no longer required.
Legal Aid, Supreme Court infrastructure is no
Victorian Bar and the Law Institute of longer fit-for-purpose with insufficient Enable efficiencies through sharing of
Victoria, all of which make up a concentrated and inadequate facilities resulting in core specialist facilities that support
and vibrant legal eco-system. significant issues including safety and court function including custody, PIC
security, demand, functionality, condition, transfers, knowledge and technology,
It is recognised that there is a premium to security, information management and
compliance and risk of failure.
occupy land in the Precinct, particularly customer services.
given the rapid expansion of that part Need for new County Court contract
phase from 2022. Balance investment in the Precinct
of the city and a high concentration of
with investigation of opportunities to
development that has already occurred in Significant issues with Melbourne
decentralise a percentage of demand
the area. Therefore future development Magistrates Court (custody, increasing
for jurisdictions (not including the
planning must be strategic in the Precinct demand and specialisations, end of
Supreme Court; and which assesses
to constrain cost and optimise utilisation lifecycle phase, continuing pressure on
whether to consider the County Court)
in an economical and responsible space).
to metropolitan Melbourne.
investment strategy. Dispersed jurisdictions, with
Ensure that future development
VCAT outside Precinct and other
solutions within the Precinct provide
jurisdictions spread across multiple
certainty for the sustainability and
buildings, diminish economies of
future service needs and demands of
scale and opportunities for efficiency,
the Childrens Court.
effectiveness and collegiality.
Assess potential for a large high
security facility to cater for the
8.1.2
Supreme Court and the County Court
OPPORTUNITIES
either at Wyndham or Geelong but
Support the retention and development easily accessible from the major
of the Precinct. prisons to be included in a multi-
Develop and construct a new purpose- jurisdictional facility development in
built Supreme Court within the either location.
Precinct, ending the campus model of
Supreme Court infrastructure.
Develop alternative uses by the
Supreme Court and related institutions
within the Precinct (educational,
support, professions) for the existing
Supreme Court historic buildings.

COURT SERVICES VICTORIA STRATEGIC ASSET PLAN


7

8.2 METROPOLITAN MELBOURNE


Metropolitan Melbourne is considered 8.2.1 Western growth corridor:
in three sub-regions: Metro West, ISSUES Prioritise the development of a new
Metro North and Metro South-East. multi-jurisdictional Level 2 headquarter
The total population of metropolitan
Court services in these areas make up court at Wyndham to replace the small
Melbourne exceeds 4.5 million people
approximately 42% of demand across and not fit-for-purpose Werribee
and is forecast to grow at an average
Victoria. There are 10 main Magistrates Magistrates Court to relieve current
rate of 1.7% per annum to 2031.
Courts and two additional VCAT facilities. and future pressures on the south-west
The courts also house the Childrens Court While there is forecast future growth,
(including the surrounding peri-urban
of Victoria and VCAT. Higher jurisdiction some areas, in particular the south-
areas) and to act as an unlocking piece
service demand is met in the Precinct. east and south-west corridors, have
for demand and enabling works in the
already seen unprecedented growth,
Precinct.
putting pressure on existing facilities.
Address additional future growth in the
Pressure also exists from peri-urban
west, including surrounding peri-urban
areas, those towns on the fringe
areas with a future new Level 3 court at
of Melbourne that are currently
Melton.
considered to be regional, and so are
serviced by small regional one or Pilot light footprint Level 5 facilities in
two courtroom facilities, but whose Werribee as a way of addressing some
substantial population growth will of the current demand.
mean that in the future they will be South-East growth corridor:
considered metropolitan and will place Undertake an expansion (potential
increasing pressure on the network. for staging) of Dandenong Court to
meet current and future demand and
8.2.2 upgrade it to a Level 2 headquarter
OPPORTUNITIES court, including expansion of services
to enable higher jurisdiction (County
The existing courts are generally (with
Court) inclusion if required.
exceptions) relatively large, typically being
6-8 courtrooms, however are located Address additional future growth in
in areas that are already quite densely the south-east, including surrounding
populated, so opportunities for expansion peri-urban areas with a future new
to meet increasing demand need to be Level 3 court at Officer.
carefully considered. In areas where Northern growth corridor:
there will be future demand, land must Address additional future growth in the
be identified now (as is the case at east north, including surrounding peri-
Werribee and Melton, where land has urban areas with a future new Level 2
been allocated by Metropolitan Planning headquarter court at Craigieburn and a
Authority for future justice precincts) so Level 3 court at Whittlesea.
that it will be available when required.
Pilot light footprint Level 5 facilities in
South Morang as a way of addressing
some of the current demand.

COURT SERVICES VICTORIA STRATEGIC ASSET PLAN


8

COURT SERVICES VICTORIA STRATEGIC ASSET PLAN Bendigo Law Courts


9

8.3 REGIONAL VICTORIA


Regional Victoria is considered in five 8.3.2
regions: Barwon South West; Grampians; OPPORTUNITIES
Loddon Mallee; Hume and Gippsland.
Support the progressive upgrade of
Each region has a headquarter court and
regional facilities to accommodate
a number of supporting courts. Growth
their Court Services Delineation Model
and demand across Victoria is mixed, with
status and to address safety and
significant expansion limited to a number
fit-for-purpose issues.
of main regional centres, primarily coming
from within the adjacent regions, meaning Prioritise the redevelopment of Bendigo
that demand often requires redistribution Law Courts to reflect its importance as
to meet service needs, rather than a Level 2 regional headquarter court
additional capacity in the system. and to address significant safety and
fit-for-purpose issues.
8.3.1 Expand the capacity at Level 2 regional
ISSUES headquarter courts in Geelong and
Latrobe Valley to meet future demand
Many of the smaller regional courts are and service requirements. Consider the
single courtroom buildings and the stock opportunities presented by the Geelong
is generally aging, in poor condition and Revitalisation Project for potential
not fit-for-purpose, with many safety development of new Geelong Law
issues. Courts.
Develop a new Level 3 court at
Bairnsdale to meet Level 3R service
needs in East Gippsland, supported
by the existing court at Sale, which
becomes a Level 4 court as part of the
new Court Services Delineation Model.
Consider the operational planning of
the new Level 2 court at Shepparton
as a pilot for a true multi-jurisdictional
court model.
Investigate divestment opportunities
for a number of small, low demand
courts in regional areas, where the
development of a state-wide online
access hub strategy could provide
access to services on a continuous basis
rather than the current limited access.
Investigate options to optimise lower use
courts by enabling alternative functions
when not in use, or by divesting assets
and seeking use of other community
facilities for court function.

COURT SERVICES VICTORIA STRATEGIC ASSET PLAN


10

9.0 10.0
FUNDING SUPPORTING
DOCUMENTS

Current and historical funding for court The Strategic Asset Plan is supported by
asset management has been constrained the following key documents:
and below levels that are required to
maintain and develop appropriate court CSV Asset Management Framework
environments. The Strategic Asset Plan CSV Services and Infrastructure Study
provides a strategic and evidence based Melbourne CBD Legal Precinct:
framework to inform government of the A Vision for the Future paper.
current and future needs of courts. This
ensures a comprehensive and clearly
articulated investment pipeline. To
support the plan CSV will rely on a range
of funding inputs including:

Increased maintenance budgets to


ensure attainment and maintenance of
appropriate benchmark standards.
Depreciation funding to support
planned lifecycle works and minor-
medium scale priority capital upgrades
or developments.
State Government capital funding
sourced through business cases and
delivered through public or private
procurement; State Government
recurrent budgets sourced through
business cases to further develop and
procure leased properties.
Reinvestment in key priority assets
from funds gained through divestment
of identified properties.
Grants (e.g. heritage and sustainability)
to deliver specialised programs.
Potential to host co-tenants in
court properties to share and offset
maintenance and upkeep costs;
potential to forgo low utilisation courts
in favour of sharing facilities of other
agencies.

COURT SERVICES VICTORIA STRATEGIC ASSET PLAN


11

COURT SERVICES VICTORIA STRATEGIC ASSET PLAN


Shepparton Law Courts
12

11.0
APPENDICES

Appendix 1 LEVEL DESCRIPTION


COURT SERVICES
DELINEATION MODEL Level 1 Central and highest profile state headquarter courts
(CBD) and tribunal
The Court Services Delineation Model
Individual jurisdiction facilities of state significance
has been developed to provide service
planning consistency across the asset Accommodation for large cases of high complexity
portfolio and to inform asset investment. Significant custody capacity and capability to cater for high
The model aims to promote resourcing security requirements
efficiency and integrated and accessible
court services across metropolitan and Critical co-locations and resource effectiveness with
regional networks. other jurisdictions
Size, scale and critical mass of expertise and facilities,
supported by extensive legal eco-system define Level
Level 2M (Metro) Multi-jurisdictional headquarter courts (including potential
Level 2R (Regional) higher jurisdiction capacity) servicing metropolitan regions
(North, West, South-East)
Multi-jurisdictional headquarter courts (including all
jurisdictions) servicing each regional area
Capacity to provide specialist services (e.g. security courts,
Drug Court House, family violence specialist courts)
Custody capability and secure judicial facilities
Supported by localised legal eco-systems and potential
connections with other justice support services
Level 3M (Metro) Multi-jurisdictional courts (excluding higher jurisdictions)
Level 3R (Regional) supporting Level 2M courts in metropolitan regions
Multi-jurisdictional courts (with capacity to include all
jurisdictions) supporting Level 2R headquarter courts in
each regional area locations defined by distance from
Level 2R courts
Capacity to provide and connect with specialist services
(e.g. family violence specialist courts and support services)
Custody capability and secure judicial facilities
Supported by localised
legal eco-systems
Level 4M (Metro) Multi-jurisdictional courts (excluding higher jurisdictions)
Level 4R (Regional) supporting Level 2 and 3 courts
Connections with local communities and agencies, and links
to specialist services (e.g. family violence specialist courts)
Custody capability

Level 5M (Metro) Lightest footprint and more informal facilities for limited
Level 5R (Regional) lower jurisdiction activities
Focus on hearings, mediation, conferencing etc, with
judicial officer/ registry capacity
Potential for multi-use community facility
Agile to meet demand with potential for pop-up capacity
to meet short term service needs
No custody capability

COURT SERVICES VICTORIA STRATEGIC ASSET PLAN


13

Top: Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal


Right: County Court of Victoria COURT SERVICES VICTORIA STRATEGIC ASSET PLAN
14

For further information visit


www.courts.vic.gov.au

COURT SERVICES VICTORIA STRATEGIC ASSET PLAN

Potrebbero piacerti anche