Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Jim Sanneman
Business Development Manager
Agenda
Who is Tensar?
TX Applications
What is Pavement Optimization and how can it provide value?
Roadway Section Design Methodologies
Performance Validation Testing to Support Empirical Design Inputs
Independent Review and Validation of Data and Design Approach
Features and Capabilities of SpectraPave4-PRO Version 4.6
Understanding the Effects of Pavement Section Geometry
Modulus Based Method for Evaluating Subgrade Support
Summary, Question and Answer
1
2/1/2016
Who We Are
Subgrade Stabilization
Pavement Optimization
2
2/1/2016
3
2/1/2016
TriAx
Conventional Conventional:
Geogrid
22 x $1.25/SY-in =
$27.50/SY
6
inches
22 TriAx Optimized:
inches 6 x $1.25/SY-in + $3.50/SY =
CBR = 3.0 $11.00/SY
4
2/1/2016
Deformation (mm)
Deformation in Wheel path
100 Trafficking tests at TRL
Control comparing products of
90
equivalent weight
80
70
60
Improved
50 Performance Tensar BX
40 Geogrid
30
20
10
5
2/1/2016
Unreinforced
3,000 axle passes
Geogrid BX1200
10,000 axle passes
Geogrid TX7
10,000 axle passes
6
2/1/2016
Unreinforced
3,000 axle passes
Geogrid BX1200
10,000 axle passes
Geogrid TX7
10,000 axle passes
Predominateroller/testvehicledirection
Subbase Lift2
12inches
14.5 osy W-PP-GT
Horizontal BX1200
Subbase Lift1 stresscells Control
12inches
6inches TX160
Treatmentlayer
8inches
Vertical
Subgrade stresscell
7
2/1/2016
Truck
Total Stress (kPa)
15
10
TX160
0
0 50 100 150
Horizontal
Subbase Lift1 stresscells 12inches
6inches
Treatmentlayer
8inches
Vertical
Subgrade stresscell
8
2/1/2016
20 CAT TX160
Truck
Total Stress (kPa)
15
10
0
0 50 100 150
Horizontal
Subbase Lift1 stresscells 12inches
6inches
Treatmentlayer
8inches
Vertical
Subgrade stresscell
9
2/1/2016
21
10 Concrete Pavement
Compacted Subgrade
over
Uncontrolled fill
22
10
2/1/2016
23
24
11
2/1/2016
12
2/1/2016
27
13
2/1/2016
Purpose / Objective:
Provide full-scale paved APT
performance data for TriAx for
base enhancement design
following AASHTO '93 and/or
mechanistic-empirical approaches.
Combine this study with all
previous research to establish a
Tensar performance database
Utilize database to validate design
approaches selected for technical
purposes.
14
2/1/2016
15
2/1/2016
Applied ESALs
1 10 100 1000 10000 100000
0
0.25
0.5
Rut Depth (in.)
0.75
1.25
1.5
Item 1 (TX 140)
1.75 Item 4 (Control)
Item 5 (3 in. AC)
2
16
2/1/2016
Subgrade: CBR = 6%
Results:
Tensar TriAx TX5, with 1.0 less
HMA and 2.0 less
Subgrade: CBRAB, performed
= 6%
the same as the
Results: control
Tensar TX5 section
with 1-inch
Validated AB and
less AC and2-inches
HMA reduction
less AB for
TX5 performed the same as thicker
conventional section
17
2/1/2016
18
2/1/2016
Structural Number
a = 0.40 SN = 4 x 0.40 = 1.60
4 ACC1
ABC
10
19
2/1/2016
Structural Number
a = 0.40 SN = 4 x 0.40 = 1.60
4 ACC1
ABC
Overall SN = 1.60 + 2.30 = 3.90
10
TX5
PSI
log10
4.2 1.5
log10 (W18 ) Z R So 9.36log10 (SN 1) 0.20 2.32log10 M R 8.07
1094
0.40
(SN 1) 5.19
20
2/1/2016
PSI
log10
4.2 1.5
log10 (W18 ) Z R So 9.36log10 (SN 1) 0.20 2.32log10 M R 8.07
1094
0.40
(SN 1) 5.19
Pavement Optimization
21
2/1/2016
Pavement Optimization
Key Messages MSL,how it works
Lateral Restraint:
Confinement of the
aggregate base
Lateral Shear Flow
Increase in stiffness of the
base aggregate during
repeated loadings
Stiffness
Improved/reduced vertical
stress distribution applied
to pavement subgrade
Objective:
Validate SpectraPave4-PRO Pavement Optimization
22
2/1/2016
ARA/Berg Report
23
2/1/2016
ARA/Berg Credentials
Ryan R. Berg & Associates, Inc. (Berg) is a recognized expert on geosynthetics who
consults for FHWA, USACoE, and numerous DOTs. He is a principal author or
collaborator on multiple FHWA Guidance Documents regarding geosynthetic
applications.
Both Tensars design method and the results obtained from SpectraPave4-PRO are
covered
The authors state conclusively that Tensar has since demonstrated, through a series
of rigorous comparative laboratory and field tests, that TriAx functionally
outperforms the old generation biaxial geogrids.
The Tensar design method is more advanced than AASHTO 1993, because it takes
into account the variations in pavement performance due to asphalt thickness
At this time, increasing the layer coefficient is a technique that should only
be applied when using Tensar TriAx, as no other products have had this
technique validated through accelerated pavement testing.
24
2/1/2016
This Validation provides the platform to tie together our full scale research,
local research, and design methodology to specify performance
Developer:
Oberer Real Estate Services Ltd.
Jurisdiction:
City of Centerville, OH
Consultant:
Choice One Engineering
Contractor:
Kelchner
Challenge: Construct public and private roadways on a 150 acre mixed used
development during staged construction activities allowing the contractor to build over
a stable subgrade, meet the construction schedule and achieve the desired pavement
performance and pavement life.
25
2/1/2016
Compacted Subgrade
26
2/1/2016
Pavement Optimization
Compelling Needs
27
2/1/2016
Published Specification
or Guidance (standard
or project-specific)
(Note: MN, WI, and MI are County/
Local Projects with State/Federal
aid and bid as state DOT projects)
General QPL/APL/
Letter Approvals
Post-bid Project
Approval (value
engineered or as
alternate)
The Modulus Based Method in v. 4.6 uses new research to determine the in
situ effective modulus at the top of the stabilized subgrade, based on the
stabilization layer and the overlying pavement section.
The effective modulus values are based on research conducted by Dr. David
White (Iowa State) and Dr. Jie Han (Univ. of Kansas) using Automated Plate
Load Testing (APLT) and other methods.
28
2/1/2016
Pavement Optimization
APLT Field Verification
The APLT system developed by Professor D. J. White, Ph.D., P.E. (Iowa State)
5e+5
3e+5
Control
2e+5 TX160
BX1200
1e+5
TX130S
W3
W5
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
Load Cycles
29
2/1/2016
30
2/1/2016
0.30
cyclic: 2 psi to 50 psi = 65 psi 1
Cycle Time = 0.65 sec 2
0.25 3
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Number of Cycles (N)
31
2/1/2016
Savings >$180,000
32
2/1/2016
Summary of Testing
Significant improvement in structural contribution (layer
coefficient) with TX5
33
2/1/2016
CBR<2
Local Standard:
1.5 ACC surface
1.5 ACC intermediate
6 ACC base
6 ABC base.
34
2/1/2016
Questions?
35