REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

REGIONAL TRIAL COURT

REGION X
CAGAYAN DE ORO CITY, BRANCH 16

DONOT PEE LENDING CORPORATION

Plaintiff,

- Versus - Civil Case No. 1656

For: Collection of Sum of
Money

DEE CUE,
Defendant,

x--------------------------------------------x

JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT
OF
NAK KHO

This Judicial Affidavit of Nak Kho, who is the head of finance at Donot
Pee Lending Corporation, is executed to serve her direct testimony in
the instant case.

This Judicial Affidavit is being offered to prove the following:

A.) All the allegations in the complaint including all annexes

appended thereto and which were already marked as exhibits in
the case;
B.) All other related matters, facts and circumstances relevant and
material to this case.

This Judicial Affidavit was taken at the office of Atty. Rolito E. Go at #33
Scottie Ewing St., Everlasting Subd., Gusa, Cagayan de Oro City.

Questions were propounded by Atty. Rolito E. Go and questions are

numbered consecutively and each question is followed by an answer of
the witness.

1. Do you swear to tell the truth and nothing but the truth?
I do.
2. Are you aware that you can face criminal liability for false
testimony or perjury if you will not tell the truth?
I am.
3. Please state your name, age, and address.
I am Nak Kho, 33 years old, #21 WashingMachine St., San Roque
Village, Cugman, Cagayan de Oro City.
4. What is your position in Donot Pee Lending Corporation?
I am the Head of Finance at Donot Pee Lending Corporation
5. Do you know Ms. Dee Cue?
Yes.
6. How did you come to know Ms. Cue?
 She came to the Donot Pee Center to inquire on our loan
services.
7. What kind of loan service did she avail?
Loan through a promissory note to serve as collateral and
evidence of the loan.
8. I am showing you this document, herein referred to as Annex A1.
Do you know this document?
Yes.
9. What is this document?
It is a promissory note, Sir.
10. Who executed this promissory note?
Ms. Dee Cue, Sir.
11. When was this promissory note executed by Ms. Dee Cue?
On July 3, 2012
12. When does the promissory note become due and
demandable?
One year after or on July 3, 2013
13. After the Promissory Note becomes due and demandable,
what did you do?
I, in behalf of the corporation, sent him a demand letter to pay
the loan within 7 days from the receipt of the demand.
14. I am presenting to you this document herein referred to as
Annex A2. Do you know this document?
Yes. That is the 1st demand letter.
15. How did you come to know this document?
I was the one who issued the 1st demand letter
16. Was there any payment made by Ms. Cue in response to
the demand?
No. Ms. Cue did not pay the loan.
17. Im showing you this document herein referred to as Annex
A3. Do you know about this document?
Yes. That document is the 2nd demand letter.
18. How did you come to know this document?
I was the one who issued the same.
19. Was there any payment made?
No, Sir.
20. Did Ms. Cue make any attempts to communicate to you
regarding the said loan?
No.

Further Affiant Sayeth None.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my signature this 3Oth

day of August, 2013, Cagayan de Oro City.

Nak Kho
Affiant

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to this 30th day of August, 2013, at the City
of Cagayan de Oro, Philippines.
 LEX LUTHOR
NOTARY PUBLIC
Until December 31, 2013
PTR No. 906760 - Jan. 3, 2013
IBP No. 918300
Roll No. 13466

SWORN ATTESTATION

The undersigned hereby attests that, as counsel of the witness,

he faithfully recorded the questions he asked and the corresponding
answer of the witness and that he did not coached the witness
answers to the questions propounded.

Rolito E. Go
Counsel for the Plaintiff
Roll of Attorneys No. 512345
PTR No. 26-26-0-10, 04/23/2013
IBP No. 910205, 4/11/09, Cagayan de Oro
Admitted to the Philippine Bar - April 11,
2009

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to this 30 th day of August, 2013, at

the City of Cagayan de Oro, Philippines.

LEX LUTHOR
Doc. No. :1 NOTARY PUBLIC
Page No. :1 Until December 31, 2013
Book No. :1 PTR No. 906760 - Jan. 3, 2013
Series of 2013 IBP No. 918300
Roll No. 13466

s and circumstances relevant and material to this case