Sei sulla pagina 1di 6

Drugs Ther Perspect (2013) 29:4044

DOI 10.1007/s40267-012-0004-x

DISEASE MANAGEMENT

Manage delirium in critically ill patients through prevention,


early diagnosis and treatment
Adis Medical Writers

Published online: 20 December 2012


 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2012

Abstract Delirium is common in critically ill patients in Many potential causes


the intensive care unit (ICU). Management of ICU delirium
involves prevention and treatment with nonpharmacological The cause of delirium is multifactorial and may include
and pharmacological interventions. Intravenous haloperidol one or more of the following [1]:
is the recommended treatment for delirium and may also be
imbalances in neurotransmitter systems in the brain
considered for prophylaxis. The use of sedative and anal-
(e.g. reduced acetylcholine activity);
gesic agents that may cause delirium should be avoided.
brain lesions (e.g. in the basal ganglia, prefrontal
cortex, thalamus and hippocampus);
sepsis-induced inflammation leading to neuroinflam-
Delirium is common in the intensive care setting
mation;
aberrant stress response (e.g. stress-induced stimulation
Delirium develops over a short period of time and is char-
of brain adrenocortical function resulting in corticoste-
acterized by fluctuating disturbances of consciousness and
roids crossing the bloodbrain barrier);
changes in cognition, especially attention [1]. It is com-
changes in GABA and NMDA receptor activity
monly seen in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit
following alcohol withdrawal;
(ICU) setting, but estimates of the incidence of delirium in
patient-related predisposing factors and precipitating
these patients varies widely (1689 %), presumably because
factors (see Table 1).
of differences in study methodology [1]. The occurrence of
delirium in the ICU is expected to rise in coming years
Associated with a worse prognosis?
because of the aging population. In ICU patients, the median
duration of delirium is 3 days (range 144 days) [13].
Although several studies have found that ICU delirium is
Currently, delirium is considered a disease that varies in
associated with longer ICU and hospital stays, higher ICU/
severity [1]. The following clinical subtypes based on psycho-
hospital costs, worse cognitive outcomes, and higher hos-
motor features have been proposed, but are not yet validated:
pital and 6-month mortality rates, study design may have
hyperactive delirium (restlessness/agitation), hypoactive
resulted in confounding of results [1]. Therefore, it is
delirium (apathy, slow/lack of movement), and mixed delir-
uncertain whether there is a true association between
ium (alternates between hyper- and hypoactive delirium) [1].
delirium in the ICU and poor prognosis. Nevertheless, early
This article provides a summary of the management of
detection and treatment of delirium is recommended, with
delirium in critically ill patients, as reviewed by Zaal and
the aim being to improve prognosis [1].
Slooter [1].

Screening for delirium recommended


Adis Medical Writers (&)
41 Centorian Drive, Private Bag 65901, Mairangi Bay,
North Shore 0754, Auckland, New Zealand Tools for routine screening of delirium in the ICU have
e-mail: DTP@adis.com been developed because, without the use of such tools,
(2013) 29:4044 41

Table 1 Patient-related risk factors for delirium [1]


patients, interventions that prevented immobility (via
exercise and mobilization protocols), minimized ambient
Predisposing factors Precipitating factors
noise (e.g. single-room rather than multi-ward ICUs, or
Advanced agea Acute illness, infection or sepsis
providing patients with ear plugs for sleeping) and/or
Pre-existing cognitive Medications (e.g. dopaminergic
increased daylight exposure were associated with reduc-
impairment/dementiaa drugs, anticholinergic drugs,
benzodiazepines) tions in the incidence of and/or duration of delirium [1].
Impaired vision/hearing Sleep deprivation
Alcohol abuse Metabolic disturbances
Prophylactic antipsychotics effective
Immobilization
Prophylactic pharmacotherapy with antipsychotics may be
Environmental factors
a
given to all ICU patients or only those at higher risk of
One of the most important factors in the intensive care setting
delirium [1]. Antipsychotic prophylaxis with risperidone
[8] or low-dose haloperidol [9] effectively reduced the
delirium diagnosis is often missed (up to 75 % of cases are
incidence of postoperative delirium in double-blind, pla-
not diagnosed) [4]. Delirium is challenging to diagnose in
cebo-controlled studies in ICU patients who had undergone
this patient population, as patients may have difficulty
elective surgical procedures (Table 2). It is not yet clear
communicating because of endotracheal intubation or the
whether these results are generalizable to nonsurgical ICU
effects of sedatives. The following are the two most
patients [1].
commonly used and best-validated ICU screening tools [1]:
Although intravenous ketamine (an NMDA-receptor
Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) antagonist) also lowered the incidence of postoperative
[5]. Provides a graded outcome (no delirium, subsyn- delirium in ICU patients (Table 2) [10], it may cause hal-
dromal delirium or delirium). lucinations and other psychological manifestations [11].
Confusion Assessment Methods adapted for use in the Rivastigmine, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, was not
ICU (CAM-ICU) [6]. Provides a binary outcome effective in reducing the incidence or duration of delirium
(delirium or no delirium). in elderly patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery
(Table 2) [12].
It is important to identify patients at high risk of delir-
ium within the first 24 h of ICU admission, in order that
preventative treatment may be considered [1].
Sedate sensibly and treat pain

Anticholinergic drugs and GABA agonists (such as ben-


Prevention possibly successful
zodiazepines) increase the risk of delirium (Table 1).
More than 600 medications have anticholinergic effects
Prevention of delirium in ICU patients can be achieved
[11]. The use of these drugs in ICU patients should be
through both nonpharmacological and pharmacological
avoided [1].
means [1]. A broad integrated patient management protocol
Dexmedetomidine, a potent a2-adrenergic receptor
that provides systematic management of pain, sedation,
agonist, is a suitable alternative sedative [11]. Although it
delirium, physical therapy and breathing therapy could
is more expensive than commonly used sedatives, use of
improve clinical outcomes (e.g. the duration of mechanical
dexmedetomidine achieves sedation and reduces the
ventilation and length of ICU stay) in ICU patients [1].
delirium burden. In randomized, controlled trials, the
Although the implementation of such an approach in an
duration of delirium with dexmedetomidine was shorter
ICU did not reduce the incidence of delirium in a pro-
than that with lorazepam in mechanically ventilated ICU
spective cohort study in a total of 1214 patients, it did
patients [13], midazolam in critically ill patients [14] and
lower the subsyndromal delirium rate and mortality rate,
morphine in patients in the ICU after cardiac surgery [15].
and shortened the ICU stay relative to prior to implemen-
The presence of pain is associated with delirium, so pain
tation of the protocol [7].
treatment may reduce the risk of delirium [1]. Whether
opioid pain treatment should or should not be used in ICU
Reduce precipitating factors patients is not clear, because there is conflicting evidence
regarding the potential for opioids themselves to cause
ICU patients are exposed to many factors that can precip- delirium. Dexmedetomidine can be considered instead of
itate delirium, such as the presence of health personnel opioids; dexmedetomidine and morphine provided equiv-
throughout the day and night, and continuous exposure to alent analgesia and sedation in a randomized, double-blind
noise and light [1]. In the few available studies in ICU trial [15].
42 (2013) 29:4044

Table 2 Summary of the results of randomized, controlled trials of antipsychotics and other agents for prevention of postoperative delirium in
patients in the intensive care setting
Regimen (no. of patients) Key results and comments
Single dose of oral risperidone 1 mg vs. placebo (126) [8] Incidence of delirium was lower with risperidone than with placebo (11
% vs. 32 %; p = 0.009)
Intravenous low-dose haloperidol (0.5 mg bolus then 0.1 mg/h Incidence of delirium was lower with haloperidol than with placebo (15
infusion for 12 h) vs. placebo (457) [9] % vs. 23 %; p = 0.031)
Time to onset of delirium was longer with haloperidol than with placebo
(6.2 vs. 5.7 days; p = 0.021)
Mean number of delirium-free days was greater with haloperidol than
with placebo (6.8 vs. 6.7 days; p = 0.027)
Intravenous ketamine 0.5 mg/kg bolus vs. placebo (58) [10] Administered during anaesthetic induction in the presence of fentanyl
and etomidate
Incidence of postoperative delirium was lower with ketamine than with
placebo (3.4 % vs. 31 %; p = 0.01)
Oral rivastigmine 1.5 mg every 8 h vs. placebo (113) [12] Treatment was administered from the evening before surgery to the sixth
postoperative day
Incidence and duration of postoperative delirium were similar in both
treatment groups

Variety of options to treat delirium effects, such as neuroleptic malignant syndrome, tardive
dyskinesia and torsade de pointes, is probably low. Halo-
Once the underlying condition is diagnosed and treated, peridol should not be used in patients with Parkinsons
delirium can be managed through nonpharmacological disease or Lewy body disease, because of the drugs
means (e.g. mobilization, minimization of noise, and extrapyramidal adverse effects [1].
exposure to daylight) and/or pharmacological means [1].
Clinical evidence for the use of pharmacotherapy in the
treatment of delirium in ICU patients from four random- Newer antipsychotics are also useful
ized, controlled trials [1619] is summarized in Table 3.
Pharmacological treatment is usually administered to There is generally positive, albeit limited, evidence for use
patients with hyperactive delirium episodes [1]. When of second-generation antipsychotics in ICU patients with
extreme agitation is present during such an episode, seda- delirium (Table 3) [17, 18]. Table 4 shows suggested
tives may be required to avoid patient harm from com- dosages of second-generation antipsychotics for treatment
monly used ICU devices (e.g., central venous lines, of ICU delirium. Second-generation antipsychotics are
endotracheal tubes and catheters). However, use of a sed- expected to be better tolerated than first-generation anti-
ative or an agent with sedative effects is to be avoided in psychotics, because of differences in their pharmacological
those who have hypoactive delirium [20]. action. However, newer agents may still cause extrapyra-
midal and cardiac adverse effects, albeit less frequently
than haloperidol [1]. There is, therefore, no clinical evi-
Haloperidol remains the first choice dence to recommend one class of antipsychotic over
another, but haloperidol has the advantage of being able to
Haloperidol is commonly used for the treatment of delir- be administered intravenously.
ium in ICU patients [1]. It can be administered via several
routes (i.e. orally, intramuscularly or intravenously), with
the intravenous route often being preferred in ICU patients, Other agents of no or unproven benefit
since their enteral absorption may be impaired [1]. For this
reason, haloperidol remains the first choice of antipsy- The conclusions from several studies in ICU and non-ICU
chotic, because although there is some evidence of efficacy patients with delirium suggest that cholinesterase inhibi-
with second-generation antipsychotics, they are not avail- tors, such as rivastigmine, are not effective in the treatment
able in an intravenous formulation. At the low recom- of delirium [1]. In a study comparing rivastigmine with
mended dose of haloperidol (Table 4), the risk of adverse placebo as adjunctive treatment to haloperidol, treatment
(2013) 29:4044 43

Table 3 Summary of the results of randomized, controlled trials of antipsychotics and other agents in the treatment of delirium in patients in
the intensive care setting
Regimen (no. of patients) Key results and comments
Oral haloperidol 2.55 mg every 8 h vs. oral olanzapine Reductions in the severity of delirium symptoms were similar in both
5 mg once daily (73) [16] treatment groups
Olanzapine was better tolerated than haloperidol
Extrapyramidal symptoms were not reported with olanzapine, but were
reported in 13% of haloperidol recipients
Oral haloperidol 5 mg every 6 h vs. oral ziprasidone 40 mg All patients were mechanically ventilated
every 6 h vs. placebo for up to 14 days (101) [17] Median no. of days alive without delirium or coma did not differ between
haloperidol, ziprasidone and placebo (14.0 vs. 15.0 vs. 12.5 days)
The lack of a significant treatment effect was attributed to the small sample
size and lack of a standardized sedation protocol
No significant between-group differences in the frequency of extrapyramidal
symptoms were shown
Oral quetiapine 50200 mg every 12 h vs. placebo (36) [18] Time to first resolution of delirium was shorter with quetiapine than with
placebo (1.0 vs. 4.5 days; p = 0.001)
Delirium duration was shorter with quetiapine than with placebo (36 vs.
120 h; p = 0.006)
Agitation duration was shorter with quetiapine than with placebo (6 vs. 36 h;
p = 0.02)
Number of days that patients used as-needed haloperidol was shorter with
quetiapine than with placebo (3 vs. 4 days; p = 0.05)
No significant between-group differences in the incidence of corrected QT
interval prolongation and extrapyramidal symptoms
Oral rivastigmine 1.56 mg every 12 h vs. placebo (104) [19] Treatment was given as an adjunct to usual care with haloperidol
The trial was stopped early as the addition of rivastigmine was associated with
higher mortality rates than the addition of placebo (22 % vs. 8 %; p = 0.07)
The median duration of delirium did not differ significantly between the
rivastigmine and placebo groups (5.0 vs. 3.0 days)

Table 4 Recommended dosages of antipsychotics in the treatment Lorazepam for alcohol withdrawal
of delirium in the intensive care setting [1]
Drug (route) Recommended dosage Benzodiazepines are the first choice of treatment for
Haloperidol Usual: 12.5 mg every 812 h alcohol withdrawal delirium [1]. Lorazepam is an attractive
(intravenous) agent as it may be administered intravenously (e.g. 24 mg
In the elderly: 0.51 mg every 812 h
Olanzapine (oral) Usual: 5 mg titrated as needed every 14 h) [20]. Propofol may be used instead
of benzodiazepines, but patients should be monitored for
In the elderly: 2.5 mg titrated
adverse effects, such as hypotension [8].
Quetiapine (oral) 2550 mg at night, titrated to a maximum of
200 mg every 12 h Patients treated for alcohol withdrawal delirium may
Ziprasidone (oral) 40 mg every 6 h
require additional therapy in the following clinical cir-
cumstances [1]:
b-adrenoceptor agonists or a-agonists for autonomic
was stopped early because of increased mortality in the hyperactivity;
rivastigmine treatment arm (Table 3) [19]. haloperidol for psychosis;
Evidence for treating patients with delirium with dex- thiamine for patients who have Wernickes encepha-
medetomidine, methylphenidate or exogenous melatonin is lopathy or who are malnourished.
limited to very small studies or case reports (B20 patients),
and not all studies were specifically in ICU patients [1].
Disclosure This article was adapted from Drugs 2012;72(11):
Further research is required on the role of these agents in
145771 [1] by Adis editors and medical writers. The preparation of
the treatment of delirium in the ICU. these articles was not supported by any external funding.
44 (2013) 29:4044

References 12. Gamberini M, Bolliger D, Lurati Buse GA, et al. Rivastigmine


for the prevention of postoperative delirium in elderly patients
1. Zaal IJ, Slooter AJ. Delirium in critically ill patients: epidemi- undergoing elective cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled
ology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Drugs. trial. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(5):17628.
2012;72(11):145771. 13. Pandharipande PP, Pun BT, Herr DL, et al. Effect of sedation
2. Pisani MA, Murphy TE, Araujo KL, et al. Benzodiazepine and with dexmedetomidine vs lorazepam on acute brain dysfunction
opioid use and the duration of intensive care unit delirium in an in mechanically ventilated patients: the MENDS randomized
older population. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(1):17783. controlled trial. JAMA. 2007;298(22):264453.
3. Ely EW, Gautam S, Margolin R, et al. The impact of delirium in 14. Riker RR, Shehabi Y, Bokesch PM, et al. Dexmedetomidine vs
the intensive care unit on hospital length of stay. Intensive Care midazolam for sedation of critically ill patients: a randomized
Med. 2001;27(12):1892900. trial. JAMA. 2009;301(5):48999.
4. van Eijk MM, van Marum RJ, Klijn IA, et al. Comparison of 15. Shehabi Y, Grant P, Wolfenden H, et al. Prevalence of delirium
delirium assessment tools in a mixed intensive care unit. Crit with dexmedetomidine compared with morphine based therapy
Care Med. 2009;37(6):18815. after cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial (DEXmede-
5. Bergeron N, Dubois MJ, Dumont M, et al. Intensive care delirium tomidine COmpared to Morphine-DEXCOM Study). Anesthesi-
screening checklist: evaluation of a new screening tool. Intensive ology. 2009;111(5):107584.
Care Med. 2001;27(5):85964. 16. Skrobik YK, Bergeron N, Dumont M, et al. Olanzapine vs hal-
6. Ely EW, Inouye SK, Bernard GR, et al. Delirium in mechanically operidol: treating delirium in a critical care setting. Intensive
ventilated patients: validity and reliability of the confusion Care Med. 2004;30(3):4449.
assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU). 17. Girard TD, Pandharipande PP, Carson SS, et al. Feasibility,
JAMA. 2001;286(21):270310. efficacy, and safety of antipsychotics for intensive care unit
7. Skrobik Y, Ahern S, Leblanc M, et al. Protocolized intensive care delirium: the MIND randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Crit
unit management of analgesia, sedation, and delirium improves Care Med. 2010;38(2):42837.
analgesia and subsyndromal delirium rates. Anesth Analg. 18. Devlin JW, Roberts RJ, Fong JJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of
2010;111(2):45163. quetiapine in critically ill patients with delirium: a prospective,
8. Prakanrattana U, Prapaitrakool S. Efficacy of risperidone for multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot
prevention of postoperative delirium in cardiac surgery. Anaesth study. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(2):41927.
Intensive Care. 2007;35(5):7149. 19. van Eijk MM, Roes KC, Honing ML, et al. Effect of rivastigmine
9. Wang W, Li HL, Wang DX, et al. Haloperidol prophylaxis as an adjunct to usual care with haloperidol on duration of
decreases delirium incidence in elderly patients after noncardiac delirium and mortality in critically ill patients: a multicentre,
surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med. double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial. Lancet.
2012;40(3):7319. 2010;376(9755):182937.
10. Hudetz JA, Patterson KM, Iqbal Z, et al. Ketamine attenuates 20. DeBellis R, Smith BS, Choi S, et al. Management of delirium
delirium after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. tremens. J Intensive Care Med. 2005;20(3):16473.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009;23(5):6517.
11. Ketalar (ketamine hydrochloride injection, USP): US prescrib-
ing information. Rochester: JHP Pharmaceuticals, LLC; 2009
Feb.
Copyright of Drugs & Therapy Perspectives is the property of ADIS International Limited and its content may
not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written
permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.

Potrebbero piacerti anche