Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
DOI 10.1007/s40267-012-0004-x
DISEASE MANAGEMENT
Table 2 Summary of the results of randomized, controlled trials of antipsychotics and other agents for prevention of postoperative delirium in
patients in the intensive care setting
Regimen (no. of patients) Key results and comments
Single dose of oral risperidone 1 mg vs. placebo (126) [8] Incidence of delirium was lower with risperidone than with placebo (11
% vs. 32 %; p = 0.009)
Intravenous low-dose haloperidol (0.5 mg bolus then 0.1 mg/h Incidence of delirium was lower with haloperidol than with placebo (15
infusion for 12 h) vs. placebo (457) [9] % vs. 23 %; p = 0.031)
Time to onset of delirium was longer with haloperidol than with placebo
(6.2 vs. 5.7 days; p = 0.021)
Mean number of delirium-free days was greater with haloperidol than
with placebo (6.8 vs. 6.7 days; p = 0.027)
Intravenous ketamine 0.5 mg/kg bolus vs. placebo (58) [10] Administered during anaesthetic induction in the presence of fentanyl
and etomidate
Incidence of postoperative delirium was lower with ketamine than with
placebo (3.4 % vs. 31 %; p = 0.01)
Oral rivastigmine 1.5 mg every 8 h vs. placebo (113) [12] Treatment was administered from the evening before surgery to the sixth
postoperative day
Incidence and duration of postoperative delirium were similar in both
treatment groups
Variety of options to treat delirium effects, such as neuroleptic malignant syndrome, tardive
dyskinesia and torsade de pointes, is probably low. Halo-
Once the underlying condition is diagnosed and treated, peridol should not be used in patients with Parkinsons
delirium can be managed through nonpharmacological disease or Lewy body disease, because of the drugs
means (e.g. mobilization, minimization of noise, and extrapyramidal adverse effects [1].
exposure to daylight) and/or pharmacological means [1].
Clinical evidence for the use of pharmacotherapy in the
treatment of delirium in ICU patients from four random- Newer antipsychotics are also useful
ized, controlled trials [1619] is summarized in Table 3.
Pharmacological treatment is usually administered to There is generally positive, albeit limited, evidence for use
patients with hyperactive delirium episodes [1]. When of second-generation antipsychotics in ICU patients with
extreme agitation is present during such an episode, seda- delirium (Table 3) [17, 18]. Table 4 shows suggested
tives may be required to avoid patient harm from com- dosages of second-generation antipsychotics for treatment
monly used ICU devices (e.g., central venous lines, of ICU delirium. Second-generation antipsychotics are
endotracheal tubes and catheters). However, use of a sed- expected to be better tolerated than first-generation anti-
ative or an agent with sedative effects is to be avoided in psychotics, because of differences in their pharmacological
those who have hypoactive delirium [20]. action. However, newer agents may still cause extrapyra-
midal and cardiac adverse effects, albeit less frequently
than haloperidol [1]. There is, therefore, no clinical evi-
Haloperidol remains the first choice dence to recommend one class of antipsychotic over
another, but haloperidol has the advantage of being able to
Haloperidol is commonly used for the treatment of delir- be administered intravenously.
ium in ICU patients [1]. It can be administered via several
routes (i.e. orally, intramuscularly or intravenously), with
the intravenous route often being preferred in ICU patients, Other agents of no or unproven benefit
since their enteral absorption may be impaired [1]. For this
reason, haloperidol remains the first choice of antipsy- The conclusions from several studies in ICU and non-ICU
chotic, because although there is some evidence of efficacy patients with delirium suggest that cholinesterase inhibi-
with second-generation antipsychotics, they are not avail- tors, such as rivastigmine, are not effective in the treatment
able in an intravenous formulation. At the low recom- of delirium [1]. In a study comparing rivastigmine with
mended dose of haloperidol (Table 4), the risk of adverse placebo as adjunctive treatment to haloperidol, treatment
(2013) 29:4044 43
Table 3 Summary of the results of randomized, controlled trials of antipsychotics and other agents in the treatment of delirium in patients in
the intensive care setting
Regimen (no. of patients) Key results and comments
Oral haloperidol 2.55 mg every 8 h vs. oral olanzapine Reductions in the severity of delirium symptoms were similar in both
5 mg once daily (73) [16] treatment groups
Olanzapine was better tolerated than haloperidol
Extrapyramidal symptoms were not reported with olanzapine, but were
reported in 13% of haloperidol recipients
Oral haloperidol 5 mg every 6 h vs. oral ziprasidone 40 mg All patients were mechanically ventilated
every 6 h vs. placebo for up to 14 days (101) [17] Median no. of days alive without delirium or coma did not differ between
haloperidol, ziprasidone and placebo (14.0 vs. 15.0 vs. 12.5 days)
The lack of a significant treatment effect was attributed to the small sample
size and lack of a standardized sedation protocol
No significant between-group differences in the frequency of extrapyramidal
symptoms were shown
Oral quetiapine 50200 mg every 12 h vs. placebo (36) [18] Time to first resolution of delirium was shorter with quetiapine than with
placebo (1.0 vs. 4.5 days; p = 0.001)
Delirium duration was shorter with quetiapine than with placebo (36 vs.
120 h; p = 0.006)
Agitation duration was shorter with quetiapine than with placebo (6 vs. 36 h;
p = 0.02)
Number of days that patients used as-needed haloperidol was shorter with
quetiapine than with placebo (3 vs. 4 days; p = 0.05)
No significant between-group differences in the incidence of corrected QT
interval prolongation and extrapyramidal symptoms
Oral rivastigmine 1.56 mg every 12 h vs. placebo (104) [19] Treatment was given as an adjunct to usual care with haloperidol
The trial was stopped early as the addition of rivastigmine was associated with
higher mortality rates than the addition of placebo (22 % vs. 8 %; p = 0.07)
The median duration of delirium did not differ significantly between the
rivastigmine and placebo groups (5.0 vs. 3.0 days)
Table 4 Recommended dosages of antipsychotics in the treatment Lorazepam for alcohol withdrawal
of delirium in the intensive care setting [1]
Drug (route) Recommended dosage Benzodiazepines are the first choice of treatment for
Haloperidol Usual: 12.5 mg every 812 h alcohol withdrawal delirium [1]. Lorazepam is an attractive
(intravenous) agent as it may be administered intravenously (e.g. 24 mg
In the elderly: 0.51 mg every 812 h
Olanzapine (oral) Usual: 5 mg titrated as needed every 14 h) [20]. Propofol may be used instead
of benzodiazepines, but patients should be monitored for
In the elderly: 2.5 mg titrated
adverse effects, such as hypotension [8].
Quetiapine (oral) 2550 mg at night, titrated to a maximum of
200 mg every 12 h Patients treated for alcohol withdrawal delirium may
Ziprasidone (oral) 40 mg every 6 h
require additional therapy in the following clinical cir-
cumstances [1]:
b-adrenoceptor agonists or a-agonists for autonomic
was stopped early because of increased mortality in the hyperactivity;
rivastigmine treatment arm (Table 3) [19]. haloperidol for psychosis;
Evidence for treating patients with delirium with dex- thiamine for patients who have Wernickes encepha-
medetomidine, methylphenidate or exogenous melatonin is lopathy or who are malnourished.
limited to very small studies or case reports (B20 patients),
and not all studies were specifically in ICU patients [1].
Disclosure This article was adapted from Drugs 2012;72(11):
Further research is required on the role of these agents in
145771 [1] by Adis editors and medical writers. The preparation of
the treatment of delirium in the ICU. these articles was not supported by any external funding.
44 (2013) 29:4044