Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
+X
-R +R instant of fault occurrence the impedance changes from
0.0
Xd / 2 B
initial operating point I to point F instantly. It
remains at point F during the fault and jumps to point
-0.5
R at the instant of fault recovery. For stable post fault
conditions it moves towards X-axis and swings down
-1.0 Xd following the path R-B-T-M-N. Point B does not
A
seem to enter the relay characteristics though it may
-1.5 come close to it. Path B-T lies outside the
characteristics and point M may traverse inside the
-2.0 characteristics and even cross the X-axis. The point of
-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
penetration is always in the lower right hand quarter of
Fig. 2. Relay characteristics and loci of LOE and STPSW the characteristics. This is a fast phenomenon which
takes less then 1 second for a case when the locus
0.5 enters the characteristics.
H For unstable post fault conditions, point B
+X
0.0
-R +R may enter the relay characteristics and cross the X-axis.
The generator looses synchronism and the locus
swings downwards in third quadrant of the R-X plane.
-0.5
It may remain inside the relay characteristics long
enough to cause tripping. It does not cross the relay
-1.0
characteristics for all unstable conditions. However,
L the operation of LOE relay is anyway redundant in
-1.5 such (unstable) cases.
Thus the basic difference in the phenomena
-2.0 causing correct operation for LOE and maloperation
-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
under STPSW is the rate at which it occurs. The rate of
change of R Vs R and rate of change of X Vs X is
Fig. 3. Impedance loci for Loss of Excitation
shown in fig. 5. and fig. 6 for LOE and stable power
The time taken to penetrate the relay characteristics is swing (maloperating the relay). (Points R, B, T and M
few seconds. For extremely light load at leading power in fig. 5 and fig. 6 correspond to same points in fig. 4.
factor the locus enters the relay at lower half but at Points of entry and exit are also indicated.)
some positive R value and X > -Xd as shown by curve At the instant of fault occurring, the rate of
L. It can not really enter the characteristics of the change of apparent resistance, R& , is -infinity, it
relay at R = 0 because the speed of generator will be becomes zero at point F and +infinity at F to R
more than the synchronous speed. The time taken to transition. At point R it has a small negative value and
reach the relay may be in tens of seconds, thus the traverses the path as shown in fig. 5. Compared to
phenomenon is extremely slow. LOE plot, the R& for stable power swing is larger.
+X
30
-R F +R LOE
0.0
20 R& STPSW
B
[pu/s]
R
-0.5 I 10 +R
B
0 M F
T N I
-1.0 N
T
R
-10
-1.5
M
-20
-
-2.0 -
-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 -30
-0.50 -0.25 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25
Fig. 4. Impedance locus for stable power swing.
[pu/s]
N
6.25
+X IV. PROPOSED RELAY
0.00 M I R F It is abundantly clear from fig. 11 and fig. 12 that the
rate of change of R and / or X can be effectively
LOE
-6.25
utilized to distinguish between the two cases and
-12.50 prevent the maloperation without any time delay. The
incorporation of rate of change necessitates an in-built
-18.75 T -
- calculation capability on behalf of the relay and hence
-25.00
-2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 the relay should be a numeric relay.
We observed (fig. 12) that the excursion of stable
power swing loci inside the relay is limited to an area
Fig. 6. X- X
&
Plot for LOE and stable power swing
near negative maximum and none of the loci of LOE
nears that. The relay tripping criteria can be modified
The rate of change of reactance, X& , is
such that on X - X& plane it appears as is shown in fig.
+infinity for transition I to F, zero at F and -infinity for
10.
F to R transition. Then it traverses the path as shown in
The area bounded by lines KL and LM is given by (3).
fig. 6. Note that:
1) The X& is virtually zero for LOE and
- m ( X - a ) X& m ( X - a ) (3)
2) The entry points in the two phenomena are Where m = X b- a
well separated. d
Here b and a are newly introduced limits, whose
III. ANALYTICAL STUDY PROCEDURE values will depend upon machine and system
parameters. For the system studied, the values of b and
In carrying out the study, the mathematical a comes out to be 25 () p.u. /s and 1.4 () p.u.
model and system data of [2] was used with same For incorporating the rate of change of reactance, the
assumptions except a mechanical damping of 4 p.u. relay logic will be logically compounded with (3) such
was used to compensate for absence of damper that the trip criteria will be:
windings as suggested in the discussion of [2], [3], [4]
If [(Conventional relay trip logic). ( Eq. 3 ) ] is true or
and [5].
The system consisted of a single generator logical 1 then TRIP.
connected to infinite bus through transformer and The incorporation of a trip criteria based on R& seems
transmission line (Fig. 1.). Saturation was accounted to be unnecessary and difficult as the difference
for exciter and generator. between R& for LOE and STPSW is not as distinct as
For LOE studies the field was assumed to be that of X& . Never the less, it may be included after
shorted and for power swing studies a three phase detailed studies for a particular system application.
transient fault at transformer high voltage terminal was For implementing the logic, the conventional relay
considered. The fault duration was kept near critical. characteristics can be approximately realized by a
The stability was determined from - phase plane. square made by two pairs of parallel lines. The offset
The two phenomena were investigated for large should be increased to Xd instead of Xd / 2 and
number of loading conditions using ATP TACS. For restricting maximum reach to Xd. This will positively
each fault condition R Vs X, R Vs R& , X Vs X& , Vs avoid excursion of point B inside the relay
& and P, Q, Vt, R and X Vs t were plotted. Typical characteristics at top. Equations (4) and (5) give the
curves for one case each of LOE and stable power criteria of tripping and characteristic of relay is shown
swing are shown in fig. 7 and fig. 8. In fig. 11 and fig. in fig. 9.
12, R Vs R& and X Vs X& curves along with relay - X d X - Xd
'
(4)
boundaries, entry and exit points are shown for both
the conditions. The entry points and exit points are not
'
- 0.5(X d - X d ) R
'
(5)
+ 0.5(X d - X d )
1.5
1.0
1.5
0.5 p. u. R
1.0
Trip
0.0
0.5 p. u. R
-0.5 X Trip
0.0
-1.0 X
-0.5
-1.5
-1.0
-2.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 [s] 2.5 -1.5
t
-2.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 [s] 1.0
t
Fig. 7(a). R, X and Trip signal Vs time f or Loss of Excitation
1.5
Fig. 8(a). R, X and Trip signal Vs time f or stable power swing
p. u.
1.0 Vt
1.5
p. u.
0.5
P
P 1.0
Vt
0.0
0.5
Q
-0.5
0.0
-1.0
-0.5
Q
-1.5
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 [s] 2.5 -1.0
t 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 t [s] 1.0
Fig. 7(b). P, Q and Vt Vs time for Loss of Excitation Fig. 8(b). P, Q and Vt for f or stable power swing
4.0
3.5 No Trip
[pu/s]
Trip
3.0 K X&
2.5 (r/s) b
Xd
L +X
2.0
a
1.5
M
1.0
Xd
(rad)
0.5
0.0
-R +R
Xd
Xd
(Xd-Xd)
30
Relay limit
R& REFERENCES
20
pp.1240-1245, 1949.
0
[2] C. R. Arndt and M. Rogers, A Study of Loss of Excitation
+R[pu]
Relaying and Stability of a 595-MVA Generator on the Detroit
-10
Edison System, IEEE Trans. on Power App. and Syst., vol. 94,
no.5, pp.1449-1456 and 1481-1483, Sept/Oct 1975.
-20 [3] J. Berdy, Loss of Excitation Protection for Modern
Synchronous Generators, IEEE Trans. on Power App. and
-30 Syst., vol. 94, no.5, pp.1457-1463 and 1481-1483, Sept/Oct
-0.50 -0.25 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50
1975.
Fig. 11. Combined R- R& plots for LOE and STPSW
[4] Rotating Machines Protection Subcommittee, Loss of Field
Operation During System Disturbances, Working Group
Report-June 1971, IEEE Trans. on Power App. and Syst., vol.
25.00 94, no.5, pp.1464-1472 and 1481-1483, Sept/Oct 1975.
Relay limit
Relay limit
12.50
no.5, pp.1473-1483, Sept/Oct 1975.
6.25
+X [6] H. K. Clark, J. W. Feltes, Industrial and Cogeneration
0.00
Protection Problems Requiring Simulation, IEEE Trans. on
Industry Application, vol. 25, no. 4, July / Aug 1989, pp 766-
775.
-6.25
[7] R. D. Rana, R. P. Schulz et al, Generator Loss of Field Study
-12.50
for AEPs Rockport Plant, Comp. Applications in Power,
-18.75
IEEE, vol. 3, issue 2, April 1990, pp 44-49.
[8] M. M. Elkateb, M. F. Dias, Performance Analysis and Design
-25.00 of Loss of Excitation relays Part I in Proc. AFRICON92,
-2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0
3rd Conf. Sept. 1992, pp 426-429.
[9] M. M. Elkateb, M. F. Dias, Case Study into Loss of Excitation
Fig.12. Combined X- X
&
plots for LOE and STPSW relays during Simultaneous Faults Part II in Proc.
AFRICON92, 3rd Conf. Sept. 1992, pp 430-433.
V. CONCLUSIONS [10] M. M. Elkateb, Seen Impedance by Impedance Type Relays
During System Sequential Disturbances, IEEE Trans. on
Due to incorporation of rate of change of reactance in Power Delivery, vol. 7, no. 3, October 1992, pp 1946-1952.
the tripping criteria, the proposed relay excludes any [11] A. M. Sharaf, T. T. Lie, Transient Stability and Loss of
possibility of maloperation under stable power swing Excitation for Synchronous Generator, IEEE Trans. on
Energy Conversion, vol. 9, no. 4, December 1994, pp 753-759.
conditions and operates correctly for all loss of [12] M. OKeeffe, H. T. Yip, Benefit and Experience of an
excitation conditions without any deliberate time delay. Integrated generator Protection Relay, Development in Power
Implementation of the method is not possible in an System Protection Conf., March 1997, Conf. Publication
electromagnetic relay. no.434, IEEE 1997, pp 40-43.
[13] L. Tao, Z. Quian, W. Xiangheng et al, Dynamic Performance
for Turbo Generator under Low Excitation and Loss of Field,
APPENDIX Proc. Of 5th Int. Conf. on Elect. m/cs and Systems, August
2001, vol. 1, pp 436-439.
SYSTEM PARAMETERS: [14] O. Rodriguez, A. Medina, Stability Analysis of Synchronous
Machine under Unbalance and Loss of Excitation Conditions,
IEEE PES General Meeting, July 2003, vol. 3, pp 1508-1511.
Machine base 595 MVA, 22 kV [15] C. J. Mozina, Upgrading the Protection and grounding of
H = 3.74 MW-sec/MVA generators at Petroleum and Chemical Facilities, Petroleum
Td0 = 4.1 sec and Chem. Ind. Tech. Conf, 51st Annual Conf. Proc. Sept. 2004.
Xd = 1.786 p.u., Xd = 0.293 p.u., Xq = 1.765 p.u. [16] IEEE Committee report, Survey of Experience With
Generator Protection and Prospects for Improvement Using
Saturation function for generator: Digital Computers, IEEE Trans. on Power Delivery, vol. 3,
EI = A eB(E
'
- 0.8) No. 4, October 1988, pp1511-1522.
Where A = 0.03, B = 6.4047
q