Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
carbon
sinks
GHG
EMISSIONS
MITIGATION
ADAPTATION
& RESILIENCY
ecosystem
services
invasive
alien species
wildlife
corridors
species-atrisk listing
ADDRESSING
IMPACTS
Figure 1: This Venn diagram represents the intersection of biodiversity issues with climate change impacts, mitigation efforts, and
adaptation opportunities.
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
The 2005 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment defined ecosystem services as the benefits people obtain from
ecosystems2. As Figure 1 depicts, these services can provide benefits for mitigation and adaptation in terms of
climate change impacts.
As an example of an ecosystem service, natural wetlands provide benefits to humans for responding to increased
storm events, an impact of climate change. As natural flood control mechanisms mitigating damage caused by these
storm events, wetlands can function as adaptation tools for new infrastructure developments while also supporting
regional biodiversity. They also play a role in sequestering carbon.
1
The Future is Here: An Urgent Call to Defend Nature, Stabilize the Climate and Transition to Post-Carbon Prosperity, 2015. Sierra Club BC.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
CARBON SINKS
Another key benefit humans derive from ecosystems is as a natural carbon sink. Carbon sinksmostly forests and
oceanssequester carbon dioxide and thus reduce the greenhouse effect in the atmosphere. Carbon sinks are also
another important example of the link between biodiversity and climate change, since they can simultaneously
support biodiversity while mitigating CO2 emissions from anthropogenic sources. Further, protecting, conserving and
restoring natural carbon sinks provides an opportunity to sustain more biodiverse ecosystems that are more resilient
to the impacts of the changing climate.
SPECIES-AT-RISK PRIORITIZATION
An increase of global temperatures by 1 C will force ecosystem zones to shift a predicted 300 m up in elevation and
150 km north in BC in the next 70-100 years. This projected 'ecological zone shift' is estimated to be at a rate of 40 km
per decadebut 'average' wildlife can shift habitats at a maximum of just 6 km per decade3. Species are likely to be
challenged to survive in their existing habitat if and when an ecological zone shift occurs. Others may undergo a
climate change-induced migration but fail to survive in their new habitat due to non-climatic forces. Both situations
necessitate re-thinking and new knowledge regarding the definition of at-risk species and, more importantly, the
relative effectiveness of species conservation efforts.
INVASIVE ALIEN SPECIES MOVEMENT
Climate change-induced migration will drive the movement of species in such a way to pose increased,
multidimensional risks as invasive alien species (IAS). IAS threaten biodiversity, often by outcompeting or displacing
existing species, such as in the case of the mountain pine beetle infestation of BC forests. IAS can also serve as new
vectors for pathogens, like mosquitoes extending the range of Lyme disease-spreading bacteria. The human,
ecological and economic risks of IAS are significant even prior to being amplified by climate change.
WILDLIFE CORRIDORS
Establishing and maintaining wildlife corridors facilitates climate change-induced migrations and, by using landscape
connectivity, protects biodiversity and builds ecological resilience. Thus, wildlife corridors are examples of key
measures to both reduce climate change impacts on wildlife populations and to proactively adapt to a changing
climate.
THE CLIMATE CHANGE-BIODIVERSITY RELATIONSHIP
It is evident that there is a strong link between ecosystem conservation and anthropogenic climate change. In fact,
one-fifth of the worlds carbon emissions come from deforestation and land degradation4. Forest ecosystems contain
more than half of the worlds terrestrial carbon, and account for about 80 percent of the carbon exchange between
terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere5. These are just two examples of how biodiversity and climate change are
connected, in terms of impacts, adaptation, and mitigation.
The 2005 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment lays out several priority recommendations, one of which is to integrate
nature conservation strategies with climate action strategies. Doing so would align conservation, wildlife and
biodiversity interests with those of the governments renewed focus on climate change.
Further, in a comparative case study of ecosystem-based adaptation in Germany and Sweden, researchers
acknowledged that ecosystem-based approaches originated from policies developed for climate mitigation policy,
concluding that such policy integration and planning is often a precursor to progress in the mainstreaming of
ecosystem-based adaptation6.
Climate Change, Biodiversity and the Benefit of Healthy Ecosystems, 2007. Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society, Vancouver, BC, p. 4.
Pojar, Jim. A New Climate for Conservation: Nature, Carbon and Climate Change in British Columbia, 2010. David Suzuki Foundation, Vancouver, BC, p. 57.
5
Ibid., p. 53.
6
Christine Wamsler & Stephan Pauleit, Making headway in climate policy mainstreaming and ecosystem-based adaptation: two pioneering countries,
different pathways, one goal, 2016. Climatic Change, pp. 1-17.
4