Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
1 IFMIF/EVEDA Project Team, 2-166 Omotedate, Obuchi, Rokkasho-mura, Kamikita-gun, Aomori 039-3212, Japan. 2 Karlsruhe Institute of Technology,
Institute for Applied Materials, Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany. 3 National Institute for Fusion Science,
322-6 Oroshi-cho, Toki City, GIFU Prefecture 509-5292, Japan. *e-mail: juan.knaster@f4e.europa.eu
424
110
100
Replacement
collisions
Core of small
cascade
Dynamic
crowdion
Figure 1 | Schematic illustration of irradiation damage. In the case of elastic scattering, projectiles with energy E (<14.1 MeV for fusion neutrons) are
scattered at atoms of the impacted solid, thereby creating primary knock-on atoms (PKAs) in different directions and with different energies EPKA . The PKA
atom loses its energy EPKA by damage production (Edamage ) as well as by ionization (Eionization ), that is, EPKA = Edamage + Eionization . The damage production
energy, Edamage , ranges from a threshold energy Ethreshold to Edamage,max , where Ethreshold is the orientation-averaged minimum energy for atom displacement
from its regular lattice site. Typical values of Ethreshold are 40 eV for Fe and 95 eV for W. The displaced atom, called a self-interstitial atom (SIA), can
annihilate with another vacancy (V) or can share a regular lattice site with another atom (resulting in a crowdion). In Fe and bcc steels, crowdions are
stable in h110i directions but mobile in h111i directions. Replacement collisions along specific lattice directions are common for Edamage Ed and
displacement cascades (see also Fig. 2) happen for Edamage Ed . Significant amounts of protons and -particles are created (for example, in steels) for
threshold energies Ethreshold,H 2 MeV and Ethreshold,He 5 MeV, respectively, by non-elastic transmutation reactions, leading to accelerated
irradiation embrittlement.
425
10 nm
200
DEMOnstration
reactor concept
Length scale
Irradiation-assisted
microstructural,
changes, erosion,
stress corrosion cracking,
swelling, creep and
fatigue crack growth
mm
nm
5m
Long-range diffusion
and segregation of
solutes, precipitate Growth of
incubation
He bubbles,
H, He diffusion
ion
precipitates and
and trapping
Long-range
extended
defect
defects
Point defect
transport and
H, He
recombination, diffusion
annihilation
generation
and clustering
at sinks
Primary de
defect
efectt
production and shortterm annihilation
Atomic
vibrations
fs
ps
ns
ms
s
Timescale
ks
10 yr
m
Finite
element;
macroscopic
systems
mm
Length scale
Continuum mechanics;
constitutive equations
Rate/eld theory;
1D spatial evolution
Kinetic
Monte Carlo;
3D spatial
defect
evolution
Dislocation dynamics;
3D spatial evolution
Fracture mechanics;
material failure
Thermodynamics
T
and kinetics
Molecular
ular
dynamics;
semi-empirical
potentials
nm
Ab initio;
electronic
structure
ps
ns
ms
Timescale
ks
computational modelling results, sophisticated experimental validation technologies are used, including in situ micromechanics, highresolution electron microscopy techniques, atom-probe tomography, as well as neutron and X-ray scattering sources. This integrated
computational and experimental modelling approach is particularly
challenging because it has to combine more conventional structure
property correlations and fusion-specific irradiation-induced defect features.
In-vessel components
The most urgent materials developments required for fusion
reactors beyond ITER, at present the worlds largest scientifictechnical enterprise62 , are related to the in-vessel components
of tokamaks, with the blanket and the divertor being the most
relevant. Inherently, stellarators have equal materials issues, despite
427
1,000
100
He (appm)
Fusion
reactor
IFMIF
SNS/SINQ
ITER
10
1
0.1
RTNS-II
Fission
reactors
0.01
FNS
0.001
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
Displacement damage (dpa)
100
1,000
RF Power
LEBT
MEBT
RFQ
Ion
source
HEBT
Superconducting
cavities
RF Power
Lithium target
thickness 25 1 mm
flow speed 15 m s1
10 18
RFQ
Ion
source
100 keV
5 MeV
RF Power
14.5
26
n m
Superconducting
cavities
40 MeV
Beam footprint
200 50 mm2
Test cell
s 1
Figure 5 | Schematic of the International Fusion Materials Irradiation Facility with its two deuteron accelerators of 125 mA in continuous-wave mode at
40 MeV impacting with a beam footprint of 200 mm 50 mm on a 15 m s1 lithium flow at 250 C. The lithium screen has a twofold function: first, to
absorb the 2 5 MW beam power, and second, to react with the deuterons to generate the neutron flux. The range of deuterons in lithium is 20 mm,
therefore the flowing lithium screen of thickness 25 1 mm thick completely absorbs the impacting deuterons. A concave shape with a 250 mm radius
routes the lithium, causing an increase of the pressure by centrifugal forces that prevents boiling conditions during operation114 . The remote-handling
replacement of this backplate has been validated with a full-scale mock-up in Brasimone, Italy115,116 . A flux of neutrons of 1018 m2 s1 is generated in the
forward direction, mainly through the d-Li stripping reaction, Li(d, n)Be, with energy 0.4Edeuteron , but also other nuclear Li(d, xn) reactions are available117 .
The fusion-relevant neutron flux is capable of providing >20 dpaNRT /year in 500 cm3 , >1 dpaNRT /year in 6,000 cm3 and <1 dpaNRT /year in 8,000 cm3 to
the High, Medium and Low Test Modules118 , respectively, in the Test Cell. The 500 cm3 available testing volume in the High-Flux Test Module will house
more than 1,000 small specimens irradiated simultaneously in 12 capsules that are independently cooled at the selected irradiation temperatures within
the 250550 C range118,119 . LEBT, low-energy beam transport; MEBT, medium-energy beam transport; HEBT, high-energy beam transport.
NATURE PHYSICS | VOL 12 | MAY 2016 | www.nature.com/naturephysics
429
Nozzle
197 mm
Side wall
0
50
50
30 30
b
Side wall
28
27
26
25
50 40 30 20 10
0
10 20 30
Distance along cross-section, Y (mm)
100 mm
40
50
Figure 6 | Worlds largest lithium test loop. a, Photo of the EVEDA Lithium Test Loop (ELTL) on 19 November 2010 on completion of its construction. It was
damaged during the East Japan Earthquake of 11 March 2011, but remained in operation until October 2014, successfully demonstrating the long-term
stability of IFMIFs lithium target operational conditions120,121 . b, Flow appearance of lithium target pictured on the final day of the validation activities
(31 October 2015) with flow conditions 15 m s1 , pressure 120 kPa, and temperature 250 C. c, Average thickness of b at the beam centre axis (Y) as per
IFMIF backplate tested measured by a laser-probe method122 (note the increased thickness of 26 mm during operation anticipated by fluid dynamics).
The operation time of the lithium target accumulated from the different phases of the commissioning was 1,560 h.
Perspectives
Suitable materials for a safe, reliable, low-activation and longterm operational interface between an ignited plasma and the
next generation of magnetic-confinement fusion reactors capable
of withstanding severe irradiation, cyclic stresses, heat loads
and plasma-induced erosion is becoming a reality thanks to
international collective endeavours that have been going on for
decades. Fusion materials research is a discipline in continuous
maturation since the 1970s30,31,107113 . The global fusion energy
community is developing further the dream of bringing the Suns
power generator to Earth, in one of the most fascinating scientific
adventures ever undertaken. We are getting nearer to commercial
fusion power owing to the continuous positive slope in its maturing
process, which is the result of the never-ceasing efforts of fusion
scientists and governmental support towards this reachable dream
of an inexhaustible and safe source of energy. Lev Artsimovich, one
of the founders of the tokamak concept, was asked, at the dawn
of fusion research, when commercial fusion power would become
available. He said: Fusion will be ready when society needs it, maybe
even a short time before that.
Received 1 October 2015; accepted 17 March 2016;
published online 3 May 2016
References
1.
2.
431
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
432
433
434
Additional information
Reprints and permissions information is available online at www.nature.com/reprints.
Correspondence should be addressed to J.K.