Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
DOI: 10.1002/maco.200704052
1 Introduction
M. Zamanzade, T. Shahrabi
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Faculty of
Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran (Iran)
E-mail: tshahrabi34@modares.ac.ir
E. A. Gharacheh
Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering,
Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran (Iran)
www.wiley-vch.de/home/wuk
2 Experimental work
Experiments were performed in an artificial solution
containing the main species present in natural seawater, as
described by the ASTM D1141. Four parameters, each at
three levels as presented in Table 1, were taken into
consideration in the study. A concentration of 25% means
that the bulk concentration is one quarter of the standard
concentration. To select an appropriate orthogonal array for
the experiments, the total degrees of freedom need to be
determined. The degrees of freedom are defined as the
number of comparisons between process parameters that
need to be made to determine which level is better and
specifically how much better it is. For example, a three-level
process parameter counts for two degrees of freedom. The
total degrees of freedom are obtained by multiplying the
degrees of freedom of each process parameter to the number
711
Parameter
Ca2 concentration
Mg2 concentration
Rotation
Temperature
A
B
C
D
Unit
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
%
%
rpm (revolutions per min)
8C
25
0
120
0
50
50
600
20
100
100
1200
40
*)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
2
3
1
3
1
2
1
2
3
3
1
2
2
3
1
10 Hz
100 Hz
1000 Hz
0.7
0.4
0.35
0.4
0.3
0.31
0.4
0.3
0.25
0.62
0.25
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.23
0.2
0.18
0.15
0.6
0.25
0.5
0.125
0.35
0.25
0.05
0.1
0.15
100 Hz
10 Hz
Parameters
Levels
Average I/I0
1
2
3
0.45
0.24
0.1
0.26
0.23
0.3
0.32
0.17
0.3
0.37
0.18
0.24
0.42
0.28
0.18
0.37
0.24
0.26
0.34
0.23
0.3
0.36
0.23
0.29
0.48
0.34
0.31
0.5
0.33
0.3
0.44
0.35
0.35
0.42
0.37
0.35
Difference
0.35
0.07
0.15
0.19
0.24
0.13
0.11
0.13
0.17
0.2
0.09
0.07
Rank
www.wiley-vch.de/home/wuk
712
Figures 13 depict the graphs for the output characteristic of the prototypes when they were bent at 10, 100, and
1000 Hz, respectively. It can be seen from Fig. 1 that on the
basis of average I/I0 value, the best combination of
parameters and their levels for the optimum performance
current requirement for 1000 Hz is A3B2C2D2. The
parameters and their levels, i.e., A3B2C2D2 once again
appear to be the best combination for 100 Hz, as it is evident
from Fig. 2. Finally, it can be observed from Fig. 3 that the
best combination of parameters and their levels for 10 Hz
is A3B3C3D3.
3.2 S/N
The S/N ratio measures the sensitivity of the quality
investigated to those uncontrollable factors (error) in the
experiment. A higher value of S/N ratio is desirable because
a greater S/N ratio will result in smaller product variance
around the target value. The quality characteristic used in this
study was the-lower-the-better.
In order to perform S/N ratio analysis, mean square
deviation (MSD) for the-lower-the-better quality characteristic and S/N ratio were calculated from the following
equations [9]:
MSD
n
1X
1
n i1 y2i
(1)
(2)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1000 Hz
100 Hz
10 Hz
I/I0
MSD
jS/Nj
I/I0
MSD
jS/Nj
I/I0
MSD
jS/Nj
0.6
0.25
0.5
0.125
0.35
0.25
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.36
0.06
0.25
0.02
0.12
0.06
0.00
0.01
0.02
4.44
12.04
6.02
18.06
9.12
12.04
26.02
20
16.48
0.62
0.25
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.23
0.2
0.18
0.15
0.38
0.06
0.16
0.09
0.09
0.5
0.04
0.03
0.02
4.15
12.04
7.96
10.46
10.46
12.77
13.98
14.89
16.48
0.7
0.4
0.35
0.4
0.3
0.31
0.4
0.3
0.25
0.49
0.16
0.12
0.16
0.09
0.10
0.16
0.09
0.06
3.1
7.96
9.12
7.96
10.46
10.17
7.96
10.46
12.04
www.wiley-vch.de/home/wuk
713
Fig. 4. SEM micrograph and XRD analysis (l-Co_/Ka1 radiation) of the deposits formed by applying pulse potential at 600 rpm, 1.0 V/
SCE, T 0 8C after 80 h and different frequencies. A are the diffraction lines of aragonite, B those of brucite, and a-Fe are those of the
carbon steel substrate. (a and b) 1000 Hz, (c and d) 100 Hz, (e and f) 10 Hz
www.wiley-vch.de/home/wuk
714
4 Conclusions
This work was aimed at providing a better understanding
of the competition between the different parameters during the formation of calcareous deposits on steel substrate
under pulse cathodic protection. On the basis of the results
obtained, the following can be concluded:
The optimal parameters and their levels for 10, 100, and
1000 Hz are A3B3C3D3, A3B2C2D2, and A3B2C2D2,
respectively.
For 10 Hz frequency, Mg2 concentration produces maximum contribution to the output performance of the
product (I/I0).
For 100 and 1000 Hz frequencies, Ca2 concentration
demonstrates a maximum contribution to the output
performance of the product (I/I0).
The parameters and their levels, i.e., A3B3C2D1 yield the
optimum quality characteristic by minimum variance for
100 and 1000 Hz frequencies considered in the study. But
for 1000 Hz, the optimum quality with minimum variance
is A3B1C3D2.
5 References
[1] C. Deslouis, D. Festy, O. Gil, V. Maillot, S. Touzain, B.
Tribollet, Electrochim. Acta 2000, 45, 1837.
[2] R. U. Lee, J. R. Ambrose, Corrosion 1988, 44, 887.
[3] S. Rossi, P. L. Bonora, R. Pasinetti, L. Benedetti, M.
Draghetti, E. Sacco, Corrosion 1998, 54, 1018.
www.wiley-vch.de/home/wuk
www.wiley-vch.de/home/wuk
715
W4052