CASE CODE

01-TI-C01-S01-114-1

CASE
Case
CODE_S
I-1
Laurel v. Misa

01-TI-C01-S01-114-2

I-2

People v. Manayao

01-TI-C01-S01-114-3

I-3

People v. Perez

01-TI-C01-S01-114-4

I-4

People v. Prieto

01-TI-C01-S01-114-5

I-5

People v. Adriano

02-TI-C01-S03-123-1

I-6

People v. Lol-lo and Saraw

02-TI-C01-S03-123-2

I-7

People v. Rodriguez

02-TI-C01-S03-123-3

I-8

People v. Siyoh

02-TI-C01-S03-123-4

I-9

People v. Tulin

02-TII-C01-S01-124-1

II - 1

Milo v. Salanga

02-TII-C01-S01-124-2

II - 2

People v. Burgos

02-TII-C01-S01-124-3

II - 3

Umil v. Ramos

02-TII-C01-S01-125-1

II - 4

Medina v. Orozco

02-TII-C01-S01-125-2

II - 5

02-TII-C01-S01-125-3

II - 6

Jasper Agbay v. The Honorable

Deputy
for the Military,
Soria v. Ombudsman
Desierto

03-TII-C01-S02-129-1

II - 7

Stonehill v. Diokno

03-TII-C01-S02-129-2

II - 8

Burgos v. Chief of Staff

03-TII-C01-S04-133-1

II - 9

People v. Mandoriao

03-TII-C01-S04-133-2

II - 10

People v. Baes

03-TII-C01-S04-133-3

II - 11

People v. Tengson

03-TII-C01-S04-133-4

II - 12

People v. Nanoy

03-TIII-C01-SNA-134-1

III - 1

People v. Lovendioro

03-TIII-C01-SNA-134-2

III - 2

People v. Dasig

03-TIII-C01-SNA-134-3

III - 3

Umil v. Ramos

03-TIII-C01-SNA-134-4

III - 4

People v. Hernandez

03-TIII-C01-SNA-134-5

III - 5

People v. Geronimo

03-TIII-C01-SNA-134-6

III - 6

Enrile v. Salazar

03-TIII-C01-SNA-134-7

III - 7

Ponce Enrile v. Amin

03-TIII-C01-SNA-134-8

III - 8

Sanlakas, et.al.v. Angelo Reyes, et.al.

04-TIII-C01-SNA-139-1

III - 9

People v. Cabrera

04-TIII-C01-SNA-142-1

III - 10

U.S. v. Tolentino

04-TIII-C01-SNA-142-2

III - 11

Espuelas v. People

04-TIII-C01-SNA-142-3

III - 12

Umil v. Ramos

04-TIII-C02-S02-145-1

III - 13

Martinez v. Morfe

04-TIII-C03-SNA-147-1

III - 14

People v. Quijada

04-TIII-C03-SNA-147-2

III - 15

People v. Ringor, Jr.

04-TIII-C04-SNA-148-1

III - 16

People v. Beltran

04-TIII-C04-SNA-148-2

III - 17

People v. Dollantes

05-TIII-C05-SNA-156-1

III - 18

Alberto v. De la Cruz

05-TIII-C06-SNA-157-1

III - 19

Tanega v. Masakayan

05-TIII-C06-SNA-157-2

III - 20

People v. Abilong

05-TIII-C06-SNA-159-1

III - 21

Torres v. Gonzales

05-TIII-C07-SNA-160-1

III - 22

People v. Dioso

05-TIV-C01-S02-163-1

IV - 1

People v. Kong Leon

06-TIV-C01-S03-166-1

IV - 2

Del Rosario v. People

06-TIV-C01-S03-166-2

IV - 3

People v. Galano

06-TIV-C01-S04-172-1

IV - 4

People v. Romualdez

06-TIV-C01-S04-172-2

IV - 5

Berdadio v. CA

06-TIV-C01-S04-172-3

IV - 6

Luague v. CA

06-TIV-C01-S04-172-4

IV - 7

Cabigas v. People

06-TIV-C01-S04-172-5

IV - 8

People v. Sandaydiego

06-TIV-C01-S04-172-6

IV - 9

Siquian v. People

06-TIV-C01-S04-172-7

IV - 10

People v. Villalon

06-TIV-C01-S04-172-8

IV - 11

People v. Dava

07-TIV-C02-S01-177-1

IV - 12

People v. Cortez

07-TIV-C02-S01-177-2

IV - 13

Gigantoni v. People

07-TIV-C02-S01-178-1

IV - 14

Legamia v. IAC

07-TIV-C02-S02-183-1

IV - 15

Diaz v. People

07-TIV-C03-S01-185-1

IV - 16

Quano v. Court of Appeals

08-TV-CNA-SNA-NA-1

V-1

08-TV-CNA-SNA-NA-2

V-2

People of the Philippines v. Edelma

Lagata
People v. Bongcarawan

08-TV-CNA-SNA-NA-3

V-3

People v. Hedishi Suzuki

08-TV-CNA-SNA-NA-4

V-4

People v. Casimiro

08-TV-CNA-SNA-NA-5

V-5

People v. Chua

08-TVI-C02-SNA-201-1

VI - 1

People v. Kottinger

08-TVI-C02-SNA-201-2

VI - 2

People v. Aparici

08-TVI-C02-SNA-201-3

VI - 3

People v. Padan

09-TVII-C02-S02-212-3

VII - 1

Manipon v. Sandiganbayan

09-TVII-C02-S02-212-3

VII - 2

Dacumas v. Sandiganbayan

09-TVII-C04-SNA-217-1

VII - 3

Labatagos v. Sandiganbayan

09-TVII-C04-SNA-217-2

VII - 4

Estepa v. Sandiganbayan

09-TVII-C04-SNA-217-3

VII - 5

Ilogon v. Sandiganbayan

09-TVII-C04-SNA-217-4

VII - 6

Azarcon v. Sandiganbayan

10-TVII-C05-S01-223-1

VII - 7

Rodillas v. Sandiganbayan

11-TVII-C06-S04-245-1

VII - 8

Almeda v. Perez

11-TVII-C06-S04-245-2

VII - 9

Cabal v. Kapunan

11-TVII-C06-S04-245-3

VII - 10

Republic v. IAC

11-TVII-C06-S04-245-4

VII - 11

Jaravata v. Sandiganbayan

11-TVII-C06-S04-245-5

VII - 12

Trieste v. Sandiganbayan

11-TVII-C06-S04-245-6

VII - 13

Mejorada v. Sandiganbayan

11-TVIII-C01-S01-246-1

VIII - 1

People v. Jumawan

11-TVIII-C01-S01-246-2

VIII - 2

People v. Tomotorgo

12-TVIII-C01-S01-246-3 VIII - 3

People v. Abarca

12-TVIII-C01-S01-249-1 VIII - 4

People v. Buensuceso

12-TVIII-C01-S01-249-2 VIII - 5

People v. Pugay

12-TVIII-C01-S02-257-1 VIII - 6

People v. Salufrania

13-TVIII-C03-SNA-266A- VIII - 7
1
13-TVIII-C03-SNA-266A- VIII - 8
2
13-TVIII-C03-SNA-266A- VIII - 9

People v. Orita

3
13-TVIII-C03-SNA-266A- VIII - 10
4
13-TVIII-C03-SNA-266A- VIII - 11
5
13-TVIII-C03-SNA-266A- VIII - 12

People v. Balvuena

6
13-TIX-C01-S01-267-1

IX - 1

People v. Tomio

13-TIX-C01-S01-267-2

IX - 2

People v. Mercado

13-TIX-C01-S01-267-3

IX - 3

People v. Del Socorro

13-TIX-C01-S01-267-4

IX - 4

People v. Padica

13-TIX-C01-S01-267-5

IX - 5

People v. Ramos

13-TIX-C01-S02-270-1

IX - 6

People v. CA

13-TIX-C02-S01-275-1

IX - 7

Lamera v. CA

14-TIX-C02-S03-282-1

IX - 8

Timoner v. People

14-TIX-C02-S03-282-2

IX - 9

Lee v. CA

14-TIX-C02-S03-287-1

IX - 10

People v. Reyes

14-TIX-C02-S03-287-2

IX - 11

People v. Anonuevo

15-TX-C01-S02-303-1

X-1

Napolis v. Court of Appeals

15-TX-C01-S02-303-2

X-2

People v. Biruar

15-TX-C01-S02-303-3

X-3

People v. Mangulabnan

15-TX-C01-S02-303-4

X-4

People v. Calixtro

15-TX-C01-S02-303-5

X-5

People v. Pecato

15-TX-C01-S02-303-6

X-6

People v. Tapales

15-TX-C01-S02-303-7

X-7

People v. Quiones

15-TX-C01-S02-303-8

X-8

People v. Patola

15-TX-C01-S02-303-9

X-9

People v. Dinola

15-TX-C01-S02-303-10

X - 10

People v. Moreno

15-TX-C01-S02-303-11

X - 11

People v. Salvilla

15-TX-C01-S02-303-12

X - 12

People v. Apduhan

15-TX-C01-S02-303-13

X - 13

People v. Jaranilla

16-TX-C02-SNA-307-1

X - 14

People v. Puno

16-TX-C02-SNA-307-2

X - 15

People v. Pulusan

16-TX-C03-SNA-308-1

X - 16

People v. Gulinao

16-TX-C03-SNA-308-2

X - 17

Santos v. People

16-TX-C03-SNA-310-1

X - 18

Empelis v. IAC

16-TX-C03-SNA-310-2

X - 19

People v. De la Cruz

People v. Mangalino
People v. Villapana
People v. Castro
People v. Atento

16-TX-C03-SNA-310-3

X - 20

Izon v. People

16-TX-C03-SNA-310-4

X - 21

Taer v. CA

16-TX-C03-SNA-310-5

X - 22

Ordonio v. CA

16-TX-C03-SNA-310-6

X - 23

Hizon v. CA

16-TX-C03-SNA-310-7

X - 24

Mustang Lumber, Inc. v. CA

17-TX-C06-SNA-315-1

X - 25

Saddul v. CA

17-TX-C06-SNA-315-2

X - 26

Allied Banking Corp. v. Ordoez

17-TX-C06-SNA-315-3

X - 27

Lee v. Rodil

17-TX-C06-SNA-315-4

X - 28

Celino v. CA

17-TX-C06-SNA-315-5

X - 29

Abejuela v. People

17-TX-C06-SNA-315-6

X - 30

Koh Tieck Heng v. People

17-TX-C06-SNA-315-7

X - 31

People v. Ong

17-TX-C06-SNA-315-8

X - 32

Nierras v. Dacuycuy

17-TX-C06-SNA-315-9

X - 33

People v. Gorospe

17-TX-C06-SNA-315-10

X - 34

Que v. People

17-TX-C06-SNA-315-11

X - 35

People v. Nitafan

17-TX-C06-SNA-315-12

X - 36

Lim Lao v. CA

17-TX-C06-SNA-315-13

X - 37

Idos v. CA

17-TX-C06-SNA-318-1

X - 38

Villaflor v. CA

17-TX-C06-SNA-318-2

X - 39

Veloso v. Sandiganbayan

18-TX-C09-SNA-327-1

X - 40

Caballes v. DAR

18-TXI-C02-SNA-336-1

XI - 1

People v. Famularcano

18-TXI-C03-SNA-337-1

XI - 2

People v. Fontanilla

18-TXI-C03-SNA-337-2

XI - 3

Babanto v. Zoza

18-TXI-C03-SNA-337-3

XI - 4

Perez v. CA

19-TXI-C04-SNA-343-1

XI - 5

People v. Sunpongco

19-TXI-C04-SNA-343-2

XI - 6

People v. Jose

19-TXI-C04-SNA-343-3

XI - 7

People v. Alburo

19-TXI-C04-SNA-343-4

XI - 8

People v. Godines

19-TXI-C04-SNA-343-5

XI - 9

Pilapil v. Ibay-Somera

19-TXII-C01-SNA-347-1

XII - 1

People v. Sangalang

19-TXII-C02-SNA-349-1

XII - 2

People v. Aragon

19-TXII-C02-SNA-349-2

XII - 3

Mercado v. Tan

19-TXII-C02-SNA-349-3

XII - 4

Morigo v. People

19-TXII-C02-SNA-349-4

XII - 5

Tenebro v. Court of Appeals

19-TXII-C02-SNA-350-1

XII - 6

Cosca v. Palaypayon

19-TXII-C02-SNA-350-2

XII - 7

Sermonia v. Court of Appeals

20-TXIII-C01-S01-355-1

XIII - 1

Vasquez v. Court of Appeals

20-TXIII-C01-S01-355-2

XIII - 2

Brillante v. Court of Appeals

20-TXIII-C01-S01-355-3

XIII - 3

Alonzo v. Court of Appeals

20-TXIII-C01-S01-355-4

XIII - 4

Gonzales v. Arcilla

20-TXIII-C01-S01-355-5

XIII - 5

Sazon v. Court of Appeals

20-TXIII-C01-S01-355-6

XIII - 6

Flor v. People

20-TXIII-C01-S01-355-7

XIII - 7

Borjal v. Court of Appeals

20-TXIII-C01-S01-355-8

XIII - 8

Santos v. Court of Appeals

20-TXIII-C01-S01-355-9

XIII - 9

Bulletin Publishing Corp. v. Noel

20-TXIII-C01-S01-355-10 XIII - 10

Agustin v. Pamintuan

20-TXIII-C01-S01-358-1

XIII - 11

Victorio v. Court of Appeals

20-TXIII-C01-S01-358-2

XIII - 12

Gonzales v. Arcilla

20-TXIII-C01-S01-358-3

XIII - 13

Balite v. People

20-TXIII-C01-S01-358-4

XIII - 14

Larobis v. Court of Appeals

20-TXIII-C01-S01-358-5

XIII - 15

Reyes v. People

20-TXIII-C01-S01-358-6

XIII - 16

People v. Pelayo

20-TXIII-C01-S01-358-7

XIII - 17

People v. Prieto

20-TXIII-C01-S01-358-8

XIII - 18

People v. Mendoza

20-TXIII-C01-S01-358-9

XIII - 19

People v. Judge Orcullo

20-TXIII-C02-SNA-363-1 XIII - 20

People v. Alagao

20-TXIII-C02-SNA-364-1 XIII - 21

Tak Ng vs. Republic of the Philippines

20-TXIII-C02-SNA-364-2 XIII - 22

Betguen v. Masangcay

20-TXIII-C02-SNA-364-3 XIII - 23

Ganaan v. Intermediate Appellate

Court
Ramirez v. Court of Appeals

20-TXIII-C02-SNA-364-4 XIII - 24
21-TXIV-C01-SNA-365-1 XIV - 1
21-TXIV-C01-SNA-365-2 XIV - 2

Quizon v. The Justice of the Peace of

Pampanga,
et.al.
People v. Faller

21-TXIV-C01-SNA-365-3 XIV - 3

Carillo v. People

21-TXIV-C01-SNA-365-4 XIV - 4

Gan v. Court of Appeals

21-TXIV-C01-SNA-365-5 XIV - 5

Ibabao v. People

21-TXIV-C01-SNA-365-6 XIV - 6

People v. Buan

21-TXIV-C01-SNA-365-7 XIV - 7

Buerano v. Court of Appeals

21-TXIV-C01-SNA-365-8 XIV - 8

Cuyos v. Garcia

Summary
Petitioner filed a petition for habeas corpus, claiming that he
cannot be prosecuted for treason for giving the enemy aid and

MFR for the dismissal of the petitions for habeas corpus denied.
Arrests were held to be legal and on the basis of Sec 5 or Rule

Dasig was part of a spparow unit of the NPA who killed a police
officer. He along with 7 other people were charged with murder

Dural was identified as one of several persons who

the day before his arrest, without warrant at the St.
Geronimo was part of the Huks and was convicted of complex
crime of rebellion with murders, robberies, and kidnapping. He

77 members of the Philippine Constabulary who rose publicly and

tumultuously
in Tolentino,
order to attain
by force and
outside
legal
FACTS:Aurelio
the appellant
in this
case,of
was
convicted upon an information charging him with the crime of
In G.R. No. 85727, Espiritu, spoke at a gathering of jeepney and
bus drivers and sympathizers, calling for a nationwide strike,

Facts: Alvarado and Urbi were on the way home on a jeep when
Beltran shouted profanities at them. Alvarado went to the Mayor

that refers to deprivation of liberty, which destierro, and not only

imprisonment, entails.

Provincial treasurer connive with employee of a lumber company

to defraud the government through falsification of vouchers for
Complainant Mariano Carrera and his brother, Severo Carrera
(co-owners) gave SPA to De Guzman who subsequently used it

Appellants were found guilty of violating the Dangerous Drugs

Act by selling methylamphetamine hydrochloride or shabu which
Virginia Aparici was found performing in a dark theatre with
almost nothing on in front of more than 100 men howling and

values and digested the claimants of most of their money with an

armed man beside him. Guilty under RA 3019 3(e).

Glenda's description of the act of coitus as pleasurable would

have destroyed the whole case against Atento but for one

decision, as the statements form part of res gestae and there

were other circumstantial evidence.

decision the decision but modified robbery into theft because

taking the ring was an afterthought.

Zosimo and Ricardo Celino together with two (2) other

companions went to Jose Kapoe's house and informed him that a

illegal solemnization of marriage of six couples. The Court

showed how Palaypayon illegally solemnized the marriages.

while the Daniel and Exequiel Victorio were later walking down
the corridor leading to the stairs from the sala of Judge Avancea,

Doctrine
A citizen owes an absolute and permanent allegiance to his
government and this absolute and permanent allegiance is not

1. Mere suspicion of being a Communist Party member or a

subversive is absolutely not a ground for the arrest without

it is not enough that the overt acts of rebellion are duly

proven.
Both
purposeconsists
and overt
acts acts.
are essential
The crime
of rebellion
of many
It is a vast
movement of men and a complex net of intrigues and plots. Acts

The crimes of insurrection or rebellion, subversion, conspiracy or proposal to commit such crimes, and
The purpose of the armed uprising stated in Art 134 and the overt
acts referred to in Art 135 are essential elements of rebellion.

It is not necessary that the offender should be a private citizen.

Article 142 of the Revised Penal Code punishes those who shall
write, publish or circulate scurrilous libels against the Government
1. In the balancing of authority and freedom, which obviously
becomes difficult at times, the Court has, in this case, tilted the
in 1st par of sec 1reclusion temporal in its max to reclusion
perpetua to death.
Any person who shall attack, employ force, or seriously intimidate
or resist any person in authority or any of his agents, while

Article 157 of the RPC applies to cases where destierro has been
imposed.

If the falsification was resorted for the purpose of hiding the

malversation, the falsification and malversation are separate
The falsification of a public document may be a means of
committing estafa because before the falsified document is

The defense of frame-up coupled with huli-dap operation may

raised. But for this defense to prosper, the evidence in that regard
Not all nudity may be considered indecent. Indecency or
immorality of a show with nudity may be gauged from the reaction

Public officer in said provision refers to all public officers without

qualification.

It has not been clearly established that Atento employed force or

threat against Glenda to make her submit to his lust.

to those not present, no matter how religious a turn of mind they

might be.

committed the rape, not to the other conspirators of robbery who

took no part therein.

unlawful possession of the property. Taking of such property was

an afterthought of murder is only theft.

there was proof beyond reasonable doubt that the act committed
by the petitioner constitutes the crime of estafa defined and

responsible for the irregularity civilly, criminally, and

administratively liable.

The term oral defamation or slander as now understood, has

been defined as the speaking of base and defamatory words

al to commit such crimes, and other crimes and offenses committed in the furtherance (sic) on the occasion the

(sic) on the occasion thereof, or incident thereto, or in connection therewith under Presidential Proclamation No

idential Proclamation No. 2045, are all in the nature of continuing offenses which set them apart from the comm

em apart from the common offenses, aside from their essentially involving a massive conspiracy of nationwide

onspiracy of nationwide magnitude. . . .