Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
SPE-AIME,
Humble Oil&
Refining Co.
Offshore Experience
Tubfngkss We-fi and Lower Zonw
of ConventionalWells
During this time, 287 jobs were completed offshore
on tubingless wells and lower zone completions of
conventional wells (see Table 1). Of these 287
I
The concentric tubing workover rig has alleviated considerably the high cost of oflshore
well servicing; and dual, triple and quadruple conventional completions in upper zones
can be dealt with economically. But there area lot of problems yet to be solved, and
the inventive technologist still can have his field day.
-_-l
APRIL,
1969
+01
63
Unsuccessful
26
64
22
9
36
12
3
9
17
7
15
2
m
Unsuccessful
36
6
6
5
6
2
12
10
3
8
Diagnostic Procedures
Good diagnosis is fundamental to a highly successful
concentric tubing workover; lack of it can often result
in a hopelessly junked completion that might otherwise have been placed on production. And to insure
that the right cure is applied, the diagnosis must be
interpreted correctly. Tools and procedures for this
purpose include static and flowing temperature sur-
SQUEEZE
NG
CEMENTING
THROUGHRE-PERFORATING
Fig. I--Concentric
402
PLASTIC
NG
CONSOLIDAnON
tubing workover.
JOURNAL
OF PETROLEUM
TECHNOLOGY
veys, fluid gradient tools,s bottom-hole pressure surveys, wireline plugs and pump, flowmeter, and running concentric pipe with packers.
Pipestrings
The most commonly used pipe string is l-in. nominal,
N-80 grade, 1,80 lb/ft pipe with a tool joint connection. The 1-in. size has proved considerably more
trouble free than the Y4 -in, pipe used in earlier years.
About 1 to 3 years of service is obtainable with a
workstring at depths of 11,000 ft or less. At depths
below 11,000 ft, tapered strings are usually run and
have been run successfully in offshore Louisiana to
below 15,000 ft.
The cost of work strings can represent a major
expense in concentric unit operations. This can be
minimized with proper pipe care and maintenance of
the tool joints or connections. A tank filled with oil
can be used for storing pipe to protect it both against
physical damage and against corrosion when it is out
1. Mast
2. Traveling
Block
3. Drawworks
4. Triplex pumps
Fig. 2Typical
workover rig.
5. Tank
6, Workstring
Clearances
Application
Drift
2.867
2,330
0.537
2.867
2.347
2.347
1,875
2.200
2,054
2,110
1.830
0.667
0.293
0.237
o.06~
2.347
2.867
1.901
2.347
1.552
1.883
1.552
1.813
0.795
0.795
0.349
0.534
l WORKSTRING
_Ooupling _Clsaranca
~1-i
::r
OD Casing)
Ckc#:ing
Nomina\~;ing
Size
(bbllmin)
#
BRASS SHEAR
PIN
ALUl#I&lM
ALUMINUM
SLEEVE ~
BRASS SHEAR ~
PIN
3/4
EUE
1 Integral
4,000
8,400
12,600
Joint
11~ NU
11A Drill pipe
cii:eulx:~g
D;IIIi7
7,000
11,900
/2
Y2
Y3
%2
3/4
1,800
3,000
2/3
5,000
10,000
2/3
1/2
(psi)
1,000
1,700
2,500
1,200
1,500
250
400
1,100
1,600
JOURNALOF PETROLEUMTECHNOLOGY
t
CbS;lN~A$C~LAR
HE40
ANCHOR
r~
I>mm
CENTRALIZER
s.~
3. I
.x
~ 2
,.-,
,-
--L:---
CABLE
.:.x
ROTAToR
DETECTOR
A
SPRING LOADEO
KICKOVER TOOL
F
GuN
CAS:~::T:\L
AR
HE40
u=~~
CASLE
@S13E1~~
CENTRALIZER
ROTATOR
DETECTOR
B
Fig. 4-(A)
Orienting tool used to perforate multiple
tubingless completions. (B) Orienting tool used to
perforate between packers.
LOCATION
OF
DETECTOR WINDOW
I STRING
* 2
STRING
RADIOACTIVE
BACK UP PILL
INSIDE
CASING WALL
SHOOT
,,,
SHOOT IN
THIS DIRECTION
Fig. !5-Orienting perforating technique in dual
tubingless completion.
APRIL, 1969
Fig. 6-Orienting
between packers.
405
er, a cement plug is sometimes left across the perforations. The plug is then drilled after cement has set.
This requires more rig time, however, and experience
with resqueeze jobs should determine whether or not
to use the procedure, In large casing below tubing, it
is generally best to reverse out through the perforations to avoid having to drill out cement in a large
hok+with a small diameter bit, Details of this operation are described in the section on typical procedures.
RepairingCommunication
Tubing leaks have been successfully repaired using a
wireline-set pack-off device that includes the
following:
1. Collar stop set in collar recess below leak.
2. Boltom pack-ofl assembly rubber element
set on top of collar stop.
3. Spacer pipe run in sections or in one piece
to cover leaking interval,
4. Top packofl assembly rubber element with
slip-type hold-down to prevent patch from moving up
the hole.
If several leaks are found in the tubing string, a
concentric string with packer can sometimes be run
and set inside the existing tubing string. Repairs are
sometimes made by circulating cement on top of the
leaking packer. If communication exists across the
single packer of a dual conventional well, concentric
tubing is run down the upper string to the top of the
packer. The workstring is pulled to below the upper
zone perforations and the well is cleaned with salt
water by reversing circulation,
If the dual packer is not holding pressure and cannot be reset with pressure, a wireline plug can be set
and protected with sand, while cement is circulated
into the annulus through holes perforated in the tubing (Fig. 7). The concentric workstring usually is run
to the top of the holes perforated in the tubing so that
excess cement can be reversed if necessary. The column of gel cement in the annulus is balanced by displacement with a predetermined amount of weighted
fluid to prevent cement from migrating back into the
tubing. This method can also be used to place cement
:b
.4
..b ;
:+!::~.
. .. b...
.,.*.
. ...,,
2.:
,,..
h:;
..,.
A
...
? ~
i..
..
CEMENT PACKER
PERFORATED
TUSING
..
LEAKING MKER
::.o
WIRELINE PLUG
UPPER ZONE
PERFS
1?-
WWER ZONE
PERFS
Typical Procedures
ConsolidatingSand
For this procedure take the following preliminary
steps:
1. Kill or load well with salt water.
2. Run concentric workstring with pipe-testing
muleshoe in well and wash out well to 60 ft below
perforations by reverse circulating with salt water.
3. Pull concentric pipe up to bottom perforations
and test pipe, Reverse circuiate well full of diesel.
4. Pull concentric tubing up to about 10 ft above
perforations. Space out with a coupling just below the
stripper so that pipe can strip down one joint before
next coupling reaches stripper.
5, Establish pump pressure by pumping 2 to 3 bbl
diesel oil down concentric workstring at a fixed rate
and below fracturing pressure.
Consolidate in the following manner:
1. Rig up Mender to rig pumps to allow continuous
circulation and mixing to the pump, Clean and flush
lines.
2. Shut in concentric annulus and pump swfactant
(below fracturing pressure).
3. Pump resin mix down tubing.
4. Continue pumping resin mix with Ottawa sand
added.
5. Continue until annulus pressure increases 1,000
to 1,500 psi above initial pump-in pressure (indicating a sand-out).
6. Reverse circulate well clean with diesel oil below
perforations. Maintain sufficient back pressure to prevent flow into the well while circulating out.
7. Pump surfactant.
8. Follow surfactant with catalyst.
9. Displace catalyst with enough diesel oil to place
all catalyst into formation, Strip concentric tubing up
in derrick as high as possible.
10. Shut well in for 3 hours before reversing out.
This sand control procedure has been completed in
as little as 3 days of concentric unit time.
.II~:.>:
F
CONCENTRIC
WORKSTRIN6
Hold the final squeeze pressure for a few minutes before reversing out cement with tubing above perforations. After returns are obtained, slowly lower pipe
through perforated interval and reverse out excess
cement across perforations. Raise pipe approximately
300 ft, shut well in, and wait on cement for 18 to 24
hours. Pressure test to obtain a quick check on the
success of the squeeze.
5. Lower tubing back through perforations to assure the wellbore is open. Test squeeze with a differential into the wellbore by either circulating with a
light fluid or pulling the tubing and swab-testing.
6. Pull concentric workstnng out of well and rig
up perforating unit.
7. Run electric powered orienting tool with kickover tool and gun in short string, and radioactive
back-up pill in long string. Reperforate.
8. Swab well and test (as necessary).
This type of workover has been completed with a
concentric tubing workover unit in six 12-hour rig
days.
Performinga Set-ThroughSqueeze in an Upper Zone
Having Communication
To diagnose for communication, set-through squeeze,
recomplete lower in the upper zone and repair communication, take the following steps:
1. Set wireline plugs in landing nipples located at
bottom of each string to pressure test for leaks. (Assume that the long string was found to be leaking.)
2. Use wireline plug to locate leak, (Assume leak
to be confirmed in blast joint of lower string.)
3. Set wireline plug in landing nipple located at
end of long string.
4. Use wireline dump bailer to place sand or. top
of plug. Dump enough sand so th~t top of S; d 2 J
to 30 ft above hole in tubing.
5. Pressure up on each string alternately to check
for communication.
6. Run concentric workstring with pipe testing
muleshoe in short string and wash out the well past
the intended perforated interval. Test pipe. Shut in
long string and install pressure gauges in tubing and
tubing-casing annulus.
7. MIXup 9.8 bbl of 12,6 lb/gal cement slurry.
8. Pump cement into well until satisfactory squeeze
pressure is obtained and reverse well clean with salt
water. Pull pipe up 300 ft and wait on cement 12 to
18 hours. Pull workstring.
9. Run workstring in long string and wash sand to
top of plug set in landing nipple, Pull workstring.
10. Perforate the upper zone with 1%-in. OD jet
perforating gun using orienting perforating technique
with radioactive back-up pill in long string.
11. Use wireline unit to pull plug located in landing nipple in long string.
12. With wireline unit, set tubing patch (packoff )
to straddle leaking blast joint. Apply pressure to each
string alternately to test tubing patch.
13, Swab both completions as necessary and test.
A concentric unit required nine 12-hour days to
complete a procedure similar to this.
APRIL,
1969
Improved Small Packers Packers for setting inside 2%-in, OD tubing are less reliable than packers
for 2%-, 3 !/2-in., and larger OD pipe, In many instances, a better small packer would reduce unit time
considerably.
Greater Capability with Mobility Current workover units offshore are limited in ability to pull the
existing tubing and packers from conventional wells.
More ingenuity in packaging concentric rigs is needed
to get more pulling capability without increasing the
size or weight of components beyond the limits that
can be handled by production platform cranes. In
accomplishing this, rig-up and rig-down time should
be kept to a minimum,
Conclusions
The concentric tubing unit can be used successfully
in Offshore Louisiana to perform almost every type
of workover operation. The techniques are applicable
in directional holes as well as in straight holes. Operations in the upper zones of conventional wells have
been conducted with successful results similar to those
on lower zones and tubingless wells. Some keys to the
success of concentric workovers include: ( 1) proper
use of diagnostic tools and good job planning, (2)
care and inspection of the concentric workstring, (3)
use of clean workover fluids, (4) use of reverse circulation whenever feasible, (5) oriented perforating
tools, and (6) low-pressure squeeze cementing.
Needed improvements to increase concentric rig
versatility include a perforating gun run on pipe, improved patch tools, low weight non-damaging workOriginal manuscript recefved in Society of Petroleum Engineers
off Ice Sept. 9, 1968. Revised manuscri ?t received March 5, 1969.
Paper (SPE 2191) was prasented at SPE 43rd Annual Fall Meeting
held in Houston, Tex., Sept. 29.Ott. 2, 1968. @ Copyright 1969
American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical,
and Petroleum Engi.
neers, Inc.
408
over fluid, non-plugging friction reducers, hydraulically driven mills and bits, small-bore pulse-neutron
logging devices, improved small packers, and greater
capability without sacrifice of mobility.
References
1. McGhee, Ed: IJght Rig for Concentric-Tubing
Jobs,
Oif and Gas 1. (Oct. 13, 1958),
2. Goeken, R. J.: Report on the Methods of Concentric
;;:M# Workover, API Paper No. 926-3-B (Feb. 26-28,
3. Tausch, G. H, and McDonald, Price: Permanent-type
Completions and Wireline Workover, Per. Eng. (Sept.,
1956) 2$ No. 10, B39.
4. CorIey, C. B., Jr., and Rike, J, L.: Tubingless Comple-.
tions, API Paper 926-4-6 (March 25-27, 1959).
5. Pistole, Harry and True, Martin E.: A Challenge to the
Operators and Designers of Oil Field Equipment, paper
presented at ASME 13th Annual Petroleum Mechanical
Engineering Conference, Denver, Colo., Sept. 21-24, 1958,
6. Corley, C. B., Jr., and Rike, J. L.: op c1l.
7. Agnew, B, G,: Evaluation of Fracture Treatment with
Temperature Surveys, J, Pet. Tech. (July, 1966) 892-898.
8. Wade, R. T., Cantrel, R. C., Poupon, A. and Moulin, J.:
Production Logging The Key to Optimum Well Performance, J. Pet, Tech. (Feb,, 1965) 137-144.
9. Goeken, R, J,: up cit.
10. Rike, J. L.: A Small Coiled Tubing Workover Rig,
API Paper No. 926-12-1 (March, 1967).
11, Spain, H. H.: Sand Con~olidation with Base-Catalyzed
Plastics, API Southern District Meeting, Houston, Tex.,
March, 1962.
12. Allen, T. O. and At terbury, S. H., Jr.: Effectiveness of
Gun Perforating, Tram., AIME (1954) 201, 34-40.
13. Rike, J. L.: Review of Sand Consolidation Experience in
South Louisiana, J. Pet. Tech. (May, 1966) 545-550.
14, Allen, T, 0. and Atterbury, S. H,, Jr.: op cif.
15. API Speci!kation for Oil-Well Cements and Cement
Additives, API STD IOA, (Jan., 1967).
16. API Recommended Practice for Testing Oil-Well Cements and Cement Additives, API RP 10B, 15th Ed.
(Jan., 1967).
~T
JOURNAL
OF PETROLEUM
TECHNOLOGY