ETHICS AND SOCIAL
RESPONSIBILITY
OBJECTIVES OF THE CHAPTER
The current concern that all businesses and the general public have for ethical behavior
nd social responsibility is not restricted to the domestic situation. In this era ofa global
sconomy, MNCs must be concerned with how they carry out their business and their so
al role in host countries. This chapter examines business ethics and social responsibility
in the international arena, and it looks at some of the critical social issues that will be con-
fronting MNCS in the years ahead. The discussion includes ethical decision making in
‘atious countries, regulation of foreign investment, and current responses to social te
sponsibility by today’s multinationals. The specific objectives ofthis chapter are:
1. EXAMINE some of the major ethical issues and problems confronting, MNCs in se-
lected countries,
2. EXPLAIN some of the ways that host countries are attempting, to regulate foreign in
‘estments and why reciprocity is such an important trade issue
3. DISCUSS some of the actions being taken by selected industrialized countries to be
"more socially responsive to world problems,
479480
INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT HORIZONS.
ETHICS AROUND THE WORLD
The ethical behavior of business has become a major issue. In the United State,
insider trading scandals, bribes, and the MAD syndrome (Mergers, Acquisitions,
and Divestitures) have received considerable media attention and aroused te
public's concern about ethics in international business.
Ethics isthe study of morality and standards of concluct. Ethics is important in
the study of international management, because ethical behavior in one count
sometimes is viewed as unethical behavior in other countries. Considerable atter.
tion has been given in the management literature to ethical problems in the United
States; not so well known are the ethical issues in other pars ofthe world. The fol
lowing sections examine some of the ethical problems that occur in international
business in selected countries
Ethical Problems and Concerns in Japan
In terms of both internal and external business relations, Japan, like the United
States, has had more than its share of ethical problems in recent years. Some of the
most devastating and widely publicized have occurred in both the political and
business arenas.
Political and Business Scandals Several years ago, Japan was rocked by a
bribery scandal involving the Recruit Company. In an effort to curry favor, this
firm had been giving politicians and influential businesspeople an opportunity to
buy cut-rate stock in a Recruit real estate subsidiary. The shares eventually were
listed on the public stock exchange, and the early stockholders, many of whom
‘were these targeted people, made large returns on their investment. When this in-
formation became public, some members of the cabinet, including the prime min-
ister, were forced to resign.
‘Since this time, there have been additional scandals. One of the more recent has
been a bribery scandal involving ruling-party politicians. In this case, Japanese
politicians received money from a property developer in return for helping to re-
solve legal problems arising from a contract linked to building a factory? In an-
other case, the official charged with running the ruling Liberal Democratic party
admitted that he took campaign contributions from the head of a trucking concern
and failed to report these funds.”
Another major scandal in Japan has involved stock brokers, politicians, and
mafia (or “yakuza”) members. Some of the country’s largest brokerages have been
accused of giving inside stock tips to important politicians in return for favors
Another charge has been that of reimbursing influential customers for losses in
the stock market. A third charge leveled at one brokerage was that it did special
favors, such as manipulating stocks owned by members of the mob and financing
their fees for golf club applications. These charges resulted in resignation of the
heads of two of the largest securities firms in the country.
More recently, some security firms have been investigated for allegedly agree-
ing to buy stocks at an inflated price, with the understanding that these securities
would be bought back by the original seller at a higher price.” Instill another case
five former officals of a Japanese futures investment firm were arrested for a
legedly defrauding customers of almost $100 million by withholding funds it-
tended for investment in Hong Kong sugar futures. In a third case, Japan’s FaiETHICS AND SOCALRESPONSIELITY 481
Fighting Back
Aninereasing numberof working women in Japan fe! thay
|, tect o axial harasanat. For example, oe female
| Stecutve ata prestigious TOK serve company found
| Stes on er desk ang so har sax if. Male colleagues
| lnned up are centro reserbing the woman and on
Srother occasion, they wrote te woman's nae the op
fa dagram of ahuman bra, ideaing whi lobes dove
her soxal obsessions, When tho woman prtete, she
{es tanforedto another post andthe men were not di
Sine Commenting on the pctor, te femal acute
feted that she spent halo her energy tying to cae wth
| te uration, wile er bosses acted as though the sa
fon was something she would have to soe by here This
5078 eny eprsenttive of wht many Japanese omen
ave 08d ovr the years. n facta recent Labor Minty
fal raves that 2 percent of al women in management
pontlons complan of sexial harassment Oni recent
have thy ape aut and iesto do somtring Now thee
trea gronng number of lavas charging fms with soa
or seni Rarassment and seal crrination
in adston oth egal acon being taken by Japanaco
omen afarst ther employer, femsle smpiajee from
hor courts who work for Japanaseased! mtinton-
Sis aso are begining fot back. For example, some
‘Japanese firms in the United States have been ht with sex:
ual harassment charges. Sumitomo Corporation, the giant
traging firm, faces a complaint before the Equal Empioy-
ment Opportunity Commission that its Chicago office
‘abused a female U.S. employee who worked as a sales as-
Sistant. The woman charges that Japanese managers
lowed pornographic materials to be ckculated and that one
‘anager continually asked her for pictures of hese in &
bathing suit. The woman also has charged the fem with gi
Ing her only token promotions. In another case, C. toh &
Company is new tying to reach an out-t-court sattiement
vith female employees at its New York offce. The UL.
women employees have inated a classaction suit charg-
ing the Japanese fr with sex discrimination.
“The lawsuts in the Urited States are more damaging to
Japanese multinationals, because thay ara being fled in a
Country where sexual harassment is rowed an and courts
are prepared to assess heavy damages against companies
that break the law. In Japan, however, many firms sb be-
love that this issue isnot a serious one. One Japanese
lawyer recently stated that companies n Japan are lily to
tty to handle the problem without making any significant
‘changes in the way things are done. If this is true, com-
plains, lawsuits, and pressure on corporate Japan will un-
‘doubtedly continue untl equalty in the workplace receives
‘moe attention and steps are taken to rectiy @ very real
problem,
‘Trade Commission began an investigation into allegations that the country's ma-
jor makers of printing ink had conspired to raise prices.
Changing Social Climate in Japan ‘The developments noted earlier have helped
to focus the attention of many MNCs on the changing social environment in
Japan. The role of business ethies in the coming years likely will differ sharply
from what it has been in the past, Previously, Japanese politicians and business-
People thought nothing of giving favors to each other and looking for reciprocity
but this behavior appears to be changing, Influence pedaling (trying to influence
others through reciprocal favors) in Japan now is serious business, and everyone
from the president of a foreign MNNC to the head of huge domestic corporations
such as NTT will be held to the same high standard of ethical behavior.
Prejudice and Discrimination in Japan Another area where Japan has faced
ethical problems is that of prejudice and lscrimination. One of the most common
amples is sexual harassment in the workplace, an issue on which more and
more Japanese women are fighting back, as discussed in the accompanying box,
“International Management in Action: Fighting Back.” In one recent case, a
Woman won a judgment of $12,500 from her company. This was the first lawsuit
ver filed in Japan charging sexual harassment, and it set off a wave of concern.*482
INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT HORIZONS
Within 48 hours of the verdict, the government hac! issued 10,000 copies of a book.
let on sexual harassment, and all were quickly snapped up.
Besices sex discrimination, some Japanese firms also are having problems deal.
ing with minority workers. Comments made by Japanese political figures about
African-Americans and Hispanics, for example, have been criticized for their dis-
criminatory meaning.” Japanese businesses also have been known to engage in in.
sensitive racial stereotypes. For example, a Japanese department store drew fire 4
few years ago for displaying mannequins with distorted stereotypes of black
faces, and an entertainment company provoked protests by selling, Little Black
Sambo dolls."
The biggest furor, however, has been created by Japanese firms’ attempts to
keep minority hiring to a minimum. For example, evidence shows Japanese firms
that set up operations in the United States tend to favor areas where minorities in
general, and African-Americans in particular, are not situated." Most people live
‘within 30 miles of their job site, and national census data show that the propen-
sity to commute declines rapidly once one goes beyond this limit. One analysis
found that Japanese assembly plants and supplier plants in North America are
less likely to set up operations within 30 miles of areas inhabited by minorities,
‘The researchers made observations such as the following:
In the course of our research, we heard Japanese managers specifically explain their de
cisions on plant siting in such terms... . Des Rosiers, who has carried out several site
studies for Japanese auto companies, added: “They ask for profiles of the community by
ethnic background, by religious background, by professional make-up... . There are de-
mographic aspects that they like. They like a high German content... [The Japanese]
probably don’t like other types of profiles.” Ina similar vein, a midwestern state official
responsible for recruiting Japanese firms to his state in the early 1980s reported to us that
“many Japanese companies atthe time specifically asked to stay away from areas with
high minority populations
This study provided further evidence for prejudice and discrimination when
the percentage of African-American in the local area was compared with the per-
centage that were employed by Japanese firms. The results showed that African-
Americans were consistently underrepresented in the Japanese plants. Legal ac-
tion stemming from discriminatory employment practices has been successful
against some Japanese firms in the United States. For example, several years ag0,
Honda of America Manufacturing, Inc. agreed to give 370 African-Americans and
women a total of $6 million in back pay to resalve a federal discrimination com
plaint, and Sumitomo Bank's US. operation was handed a $2.6 million sex dis-
crimination verdict
These examples and empirical evidence indicate that Japanese firms in the
United States have had more than their share of problems in dealing with the hit-
ing and treatment of minorities and women. More important, unless Japanese
firms change their approach, these problems will grow worse during the coming,
years, because equality in the workplace continues to be a central social issue and
indicator for social responsibility of business in the United States.” In fairness to
the Japanese, however, it should be noted that they are making an effort to im-
prove equality in employment, and their concern for the safety and health of
workers may be unmatched anywhere in the world."
Social Responsibility Implications from Lobbying Another area of growing
ethical concern is the Japanese lobbying effort in the United States."* Japan, more(CHAPTER 17; ETHICS AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILTY 483
than othér countries, spends millions of dollars every year for lobbying in Wash-
ington. For this money, Japanese firms have been able to hire very savvy, effective
Jobbyists, and these investments seem to be getting results. For example, when the
Japanese firm Toshiba sold defense-sensitive, high-tech milling equipment to the
former Soviet Union, the Japanese lobby in Washington was able to defuse the is-
sue effectively. The lobbyists persuaded those writing sanctions into a final trade
bill to water down the penalties for Toshiba
‘The Japanese also have been very effective in lobbying at the state and local lev-
els. Here are two examples:
In Illinois, where Mitsubishi Corp. opened 2 $650 million auto plant with Chrysler
CCorp., Mitsubishi executives became a driving force behind the month-long Festival of
Japan. Working through the Chicago Japanese Chamber of Commerce and the Japan-
‘America Society, in cooperation with the Japanese consul-general, they raised $1.2 mil-
lion for the festival. The highlight of the event: a vist by then Prime Minister Nobors
‘Takeshita to meet Illinois Governor James R. Thompson and other luminaries,
In the southeast, Japan's regional effort is assisted by former Georgia Governor
George Busbee, a founder of the Japan/US, Southeast Assn, which groups top Japa-
nese and Southeastern political ane business leaders, When a Washington problem
arises, these regional networks are in place to help Japan. Says TRW's Choate [a well-
known trade expert), “The Japanese government and Japanese companies are infinitely
‘more effective in lobbying in this town [than US. companies)"
Is it ethical for Japanese firms to hire bank-rolled, well-connected, talented lob-
byists to argue their case in Washington? Is it ethical for former US. cabinet offt-
cers and elected officials to become lobbyists for Japan? Recall the furor over ex-
President Reagan's receiving millions of dollars for his speaking engagements in
Japan soon after he left office. Certainly, these activities are legal. Many Americans
feel that the interests of the United States and Japan are not the same when it
comes to business dealings, however, and that Americans are being shortchanged
in the process. To the extent that these feelings (some would call them latent
racism)'” persist, Japanese lobbying will continue to be an area of ethical concern
during the years ahead. 4
The Status of Women Managers in Japan The number of women in manager- |
ial positions in Japan has been increasing in recent years, but statistics reveal that |
these opportunities still are quite limited and, similar to the US., a “glass ceiling”
exists, For example, in 1979, as part of the background research for the forthcom- :
ing Japanese Equal Employment Opportunity Law, a cabinet-level commission
surveyed companies listed on the stock exchange and special corporations in three
‘major urban centers. The data revealed that of the 1497 companies surveyed, the
average firm had 3321 employees, and of these, 242 were in management posi-
tions. Women, however, constituted 23 percent of the work force of these large
firms—but only 0.3 percent of those in decision-making positions.
Since then, follow-up studies have tried to determine whether Japanese women
Were making any headway in large firms. In 1981, the same cabinet-level com-
mission found that the number of women employees had grown to 40 percent of
the work force in these large firms—but still only 0.5 percent of the management
group. A 1984 study found a very slight improvement, but women still repre- |
sented less than 1 percent of management. In a 1989 update, the Women’s Bureau
surveyed 7000 Japanese companies with 30 or more employees. This study was
conducted 3 years after the Equal Employment Opportunity Law went into effect. '4840 paRTs: INTERNATIONAL WANAGEMENT HORIZONS
Inthe largest frm, the Bureau found that 12 percent of companies with more than
“100 workers and 67 percent of those with 1000 to 4999 workers had woman
the division-hend level, For women at the section-head level, the rates were at
Percent for companies with over 300 workers and 25 percent for those with 10)
{o 4999 workers. For women atthe first supervisory level, which represents the
Pool from which managerial personnel will be selected in the futur, the ae
were 72 percent of companies with 5000 or more employees and 52 percent ot
companies with 1000 to 4999 employees. Overall, the japanese Women’s Burton
concluded!
These gure area remarkable improvement over the situation reported in 196. They
all refer, however tothe percentage of companies that report having any women at]
in theic managerial ranks. The actual percentage of women in these postions reraing
minuscule, According tothe national wage census for 1989, in companies employing
1.000 oF more persons, only 0.36 percent of division heads and 0.13 percent of sce
heads were women but women held 36 percent ofthe... subsection-head positions By
the most generous measure, women occupied only 22 percent of managerial positn,
in companies with 1000 or more employees."
There are a number of reasons for the lack of progress among women in large
Japanese firms. One is that they often are excluded from transfers to branch offices
OF posts far away from their homes. As a result, they are unable to acquire the
range of experience needed for promotion to upper-level managerial positions
Among those Japanese women who have been able to achieve managerial rank
in large corporations, there is evidence that they have done so only after long ser
vice to the company and often at the expense of marriage and motherhood. The
fastest road to the top for Japanese women appears to be in small businesses,
where they are able to play an important role and are recognized for their achieve.
ments. The opportunities do not seem to be as promising in large firms, despite
the enactment of the Equal Employment Opportunity Law that was supposed to
help reduce barriers to promotion. In fact, under current interpretations of this
law, firms can require women to commit themselves at the time of hiring to either
(1) a traditional track with good benefits but no promotion opportunities; or 2) a
career track with more rigorous standards and opportunities ostensibly equiva-
lent to those offered to male permanent employees. Since most women are un-
willing to opt for the latter track, businesses feel they can legitimately refuse to
Promote them to higher level positions. Moreover, because few women work in
government ministries that could put political pressure on companies to alter.
their current practices, there appears to be little likelihood that things will change
in the near future. About the only major development that could change this bleak
picture for Japanese women may be the inereasing demand for skilled employees
and the growing labor shortage now being brought about by declining birth rates.
Commenting on this development in Japan, Steinhoff and Tanaka recently pre
dicted:
‘The labor shortage will not only increase employment opportunities for women in large
companies but will atthe same time lead to changes in the way large companies utilize
their managerial employees. The companies assume that women are unwilling OF
able to meet the high time and energy commitments the current managerial system de
‘mands, but young men are also increasingly reluctant to pay the price. As the compat
nies reduce working hours, social demands, and arbitrary transfers in order #9 KeeP
; their male managers, they will also be creating a more favorable working environmentCHABTER 17: ETHICS AND SOCAL RESPONSIOLITY 485
for women. Thus Japan appears tobe at a turning point, with several factors converging
'o change both the opportunity structure and the work environment for women in mane
agement."
Ethical Problems and Concerns in Europe
Ethical behavior in European countries is an important area of interest in interna-
tional management, Because in some respects, these countries differ sharply from
Japan and the United States.™ France and Germany are good representative ex.
amples.
One study surveyed 124 US,, 72 French, and 70 German managers." Each was
asked to respond to a series of five vignettes that examined ethical situations re,
lated to coercion and control, conflict of interes, the physical environment, pater-
nalism, ancl personal integrity. In most cases, the U.S, managers’ responses were
quite different from those of their European counterparts. The following is an ex.
ample of one of the vignettes:
Rollfast Bicycle Company bas been barred from entering the market in a large Asian
country by collusive efforts ofthe local bicycle manufacturers. Rolfast could expect to
net 5 million dollars per year from sales if it could penetrate the market. Last week »
businessman from the country contacted the management of Rollfast and stated that he
could smooth the way for the company to sellin his country for a price of $500,000.
‘The executives from the three countries were asked how they would respond to
the request for payment. The Americans were opposed to paying the money; 39
Petent of them said that a bribe was unethical oF illegal under the Foreign Cor-
rupt Practices Act, Only 12 percent of the French managers felt that way, and none
of the Germans agreed. However, 55 percent of the French and 29 percent of the
Germans said that paying the money was not unethical but merely the price to be
paid for doing business.
Part of the reason for these answers is that to date, neither France nor Germany
has laws that make it a crime to bribe or corrupt a public or private official of an-
other country. Legal restrictions are not the only reasons for the differences in
‘managerial views of ethical behavior, however, Here is the conflict-of-interest vi
pnette that was presented to the managers:
Jack Brown is vice president of marketing for Tangy Spices, «large spice manufacturer
Jack recently joined a business venture with Tangy’s director of purchasing to import
black pepper from India. Jack’s new company is about to sign a five year contract with
Tangy to supply their black pepper needs. The contract i set ata price 3 cents per pound
above the current market price for comparable black pepper imports”
Should Brown sign the contract? Once again, the managers were divided regard
ing what should be done ancl why. Most U.S. managers felt that signing the con.
tract would be dishonest or a conflict of interest. Many of the French managers
asreedi, but only one-third of the Germans indicated that they would not sign the
agreement,
Summing up the responses of the managers to all five vignettes, the researchers
concluded
lone were to generalize, the US, managers were noticeably more concerned with eth
“al and legal questions. Their French and German counterparts appeared to worry486 PARTS: INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT HORIZONS
‘more about maintaining a successful business posture, To e sure, there was some over.
8: Ps over
lapping of responses; however, the dtferences remained.”
This cross-national research on ethical behavior shows that MNCs must be
aware that the ethical practices oftheir home country may be quite different from,
those of countries where they do business. A number of reasons account for these
differences, including culture, personal values, incentives, and the obvious legal
restrictions.
‘The Status of Women Managers in Europe
Because most European countries have experienced only limited population
growth in recent years, integration of women into the work force has become a
critical goal. Similar to the United States and Japan, however, European women
have encountered equal opportunity problems and a “glass ceiling” in the man.
agerial ranks. The following discussion examines the current status of women
‘managers in three major European nations: France, Germany, and Great Britain,
France The proportion of French women in the labor force from 1900 until 1979
remained at about 35 percent. Since then, however, more than 2 million women
have entered the work force, compared with less than 200,000 men. This trend
‘would seem to indicate that women now should be gaining a greater foothold in
the managerial ranks—and to a degree, this is true. Over the last 35 years, the
number of women managers has increased almost ninefold, while the number of
‘managerial positions has increased fivefold. The greatest gains have been in prod-
uct promotion and sales, import-export, sales administration, real estate, urban
planning and architecture, socioeconomic studies, and chemistry. Table 17-1 pro-
vides some of the latest available cata on French managers by function.
Although French women are making strides in the management ranks, they
still are underrepresented in corporate management. Table 17-1 shows that
women still are far behind men in terms of corporate management and the tradi-
tional functions of manufacturing and sales. A number of reasons are given for
this underrepresentation. One is that promotion into top management depends on
more than diplomas, abilities, and ambitions As in the United States and Japan,
French women face many obstacles when trying to break the glass ceiling, As one
analysis of women managers in France notes;
Being a manage incades having to work long hour, travel, make difcult decisions!
tmotvate people, and achieve high bjsctives “most often with limited resources and
strong business competitors, For women manages it also often means ghting thin
their own company to establish a reputation asa leader—since women are rarely spot
taneously seen as leaders avoiding or responding appropriately to Sexist ceca
tvating employees to accept and execte ther decision, and sometimes hiding thet
iamily problems. Women frequently have more dificult than men getting acess 0
formation necessary to make wise corer decisions. Although its important for women
to understand the organization's carer cir, few companies in France provide such
information through ether equal opportunity managers or assertiveness courses™
Froma legal standpoint, French law guarantees equal treatment and equal pro-
fessional opportunities. Enforcement of these guarantees is fairly weak, howevel,
and organizations that could be valuable to women generally are uninvolved. Fot
example, unions have generally resisted taking on women’s issues, and there afonneren 17
Tics ano soci ResPoxsiouTy 487
Function Percentage of women Percentage of men
Corporate management 29 66
Manufacturing, construction 22 107
Manufacturing support services 24 a5.
esearch, dovelonmant 79 129
Marketing Sales 199 ara
Banking, insurance, rel estate, 40 44
tourism, transportation
Administration 184 61
Finance, accounting, contol 86 57
Information ystems 78 97
Personnel, education 7 a7
(Communications 87 18
Medical, social, culture oa 24
Others 28 14
Total 100.0 1000
eee
‘The total i tas tan 100 becaute of rounding,
‘Source: Helene Alexandre, Les Fermes Cazes [Women Manages. Pas: APEC, 1850.
zo organizations in France comparable to the Coalition of Labor Union Women in
the United States that could promote equal opportunity issues. Even French asso-
ciations of women managers are limited in their efforts and, for the most part, fo-
us primarily on social networking, So, while some French companies have pro-
‘moted women into higher-level positions and have affirmative action programs in
place, these firms unfortunately still are the exception rather than the rule. As one
analyst recently put it, “Companies’ needs for the best possible managers will fa-
vor highly qualified women; but to succeed, these women will most likely have to
accept even more difficult working conditions.”
Germany Before unification, 47 percent of working-age women in West Ger-
many and 91 percent of those in East Germany were in the work force. In both
West and East, however, women held few top management positions. Studies of
large West German firms found that 5.9 percent of top managers and 7.8 percent
of managers at the next level were women, but only 0.7 percent were members of
managing boards of public companies. [n East Germany, one-third of all manage-
ment positions were held by women, but these primarily were low-level jobs.
With the unification of Germany, the status of women in management does not
look any more promising, One reason is that professional qualifications appear to
relate inversely to hierarchical position. Antal and Krebsbach-Gnath explained
this seeming paradox as follows:
‘The higher the position, the less significance the organization attaches to... “objective”
ériteria. The factors that receive more weight in promotion decisions for senior manage-
‘ment positions are both less objective and more often based on traditional male career
Patterns. In effect, therefore, they discriminate against women. Among the factors listed488. pants:
IVTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT HORIZONS
in one study for promotion into upper-level management were professional com,
tence, effectiveness, professional experience, length of experience, time with the cue
pany, commitment to the jo, and professional and regional mobility. To the extent the:
“objective” factors and qualifications, such as education and training that women car
consciously acquire, play a lesser role in decision making, other sociopsychological and
systemic factors assume increasing importance and create less easly surmountable bar,
riers to carver development for women
Unlike some other countries, Germany in the last decade has introduced laws
that mandate equal opportunity and the creation of equal opportunity positions
throughout the public sector. Today, all German states must ensure that ther leg.
islation provides for equal treatment of men and women in the workplace. On the
other hand, use of quotas are unacceptable, and this makes the legislation difficult
to enforce. Additionally, those individuals who are designated as equal opportu.
nity officers typically have difficulty carrying out their tasks, because they often
lack the needed authority to enforce their decisions.
In the private sector, there has been some progress toward increasing the nume
ber of women in upper-level management positions through the introduction of
voluntary equal opportunity programs. Some German firms also have nominated
individuals or groups and assigned them the responsibility of ensuring equal op-
portunity for all personnel. Another, and more recent, development is the concla-
sion of company-level, work-family agreements between employers and workers’
representatives regarding parental leave and return plans. These plans allow em
ployees to take a longer parental leave than is granted by law, and to attract these
employees back, these plans guarantee an equivalent job on returning from the ex-
tended leave.
Some analysts indicate that Germany’s growing need for competent managers
likely will increase the number of women in management and the opportunity
for them to achieve higher-level positions. On the other side, critics argue this is
wishful thinking and that what is needed is stronger legislation. Still others con-
tend! that until there is a fundamental change in the way that male managers view
the role and status of women, nothing significant will happen. These arguments
all point to one conclusion: Opportunities for women managers in Germany re-
‘main limited and do not seem likely to improve significantly before the turn of the
century:
Great Britain By the beginning of the 1990s, approximately 12 million women
‘were in the British work force, which was about 44 percent of the country’s total
work force. As shown in Table 17-2, the number of women in management and re-
lated occupations has been steadily increasing over the last two decades. Once
again, however, as in other countries, British women are not well represented at
the highest levels of most organizations. As one analyst notes:
If membership in the Institute of Directors is an indicator, the proportion of women at
the most senior levels in both the public and private sector remains very small, There are
‘ho woman chief executives among Britain’s top 100 companies, as listed in The Times.
and a 1989 report found that among members of company boards in the 200 langest i
lustrial companies in the United Kingdom, only 21 had women board members. In o-
tal, 24 women were appointed, but the majority, eighteen, were either part-time of
rnonexeeutive directors. Several of the appointed women had a family connection to the
‘company or a title—that of Indy of baroness.»OARETER 17) ETHICS AND SOOIALRESPONSILTY 489 nM
DRITISH WOMEN IN MANAGEMENT AND RELATED OCCUPATIONS
— ‘Women as a percentage of
all employees in catagory
category 1975 1996 1991
oneral management 97 104 =
Management positions, excluding general 109 164 =
management
Professional and related supporting management 120 203 -
and administrative positions
Managers and administrators = = 308
Professional occupations = - 383
‘Associate professional and technical occupations = = 43
‘Wal, all management and related occupations 13 174 379
Source: New Earings Survey 1975 Pat. Table 198 aw Eurngs Survey 1986, Pan. Taba 198, Laon
HMSO: M. Nayor ana: Purd, "asus of he 1991 Labour Free Savy Ehploroon aan Ae ee
‘Most women managers in Britain are employed in retail distribution, hotel and
catering, banking, finance, medical and other health services, and food, drink, and
tobacco: Almost all of these women managers are atthe lowest levels, and they
have a long way to go if they hope to reach the top. Legislation designed to pre-
vent discrimination in the work place is proving to be of limited value; however,
number of steps are being taken to help British women attain equal opportunity
in employment.
In recent years, British women have been setting up their own associations, 1
such as the Women’s Engineering Society, to develop sources for networking and i
to increase their political lobbying power. There also is a national association,
known as The 300 Group, that campaigns for women seeking election to Parla.
ment, In addition, women have become very active in joining management and
Professional associations, such as the Hotel, Catering and Institutional Manage-
‘ment Association; the Institute of Personnel Management; and the Institute of \
Health Service Management. Women now constitute 50 percent or more of the i
membership in these professional associations.
At the same time, a growing number of British companies are proactively try-
ing to recruit and promote women into the management ranks. They are intto-
ducing career development programs specifically for women and are prepared to
take whatever steps are necessary to ensure that outstanding women remain with
‘he company. For example, the National Westminster Bank allows women man
agers to leave for up to 5 years to raise their children and then return to a man~
agement position at their previous level. Firms also are designing strategies to en. |
Sure that equal opportunities are, in fact, being implemented. Chief executives
and directors of leading companies recently have formed a group known as Op-
Portunity 2000. One of the group's goals is to provide a wide range of assistance
‘o women who are interested in business careers; in particular, the focus is on
helping firms to demonstrate a commitment to these goals, change their old ways
of doing business, communicate their desires to potential women managers, and490 FARTS: INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT HORIZONS.
make the necessary financial and time commitments that are needed to ensure
success. While its sil foo early to say how successful Opportunity 2000 vl be
these efforts do appear tobe onthe right track. One analysts summed up the cat
rent status and future direction as follows:
Recent forecasts of the economy in Britain have highlighted the increased dependence
that companies will have on women in the twenty-first century It forecasts that there
will be greater need for managers, professionals, and associated staff and that women
‘will generally represent an increasing proportion of that workforce. It remains to be seen
‘whether initiatives such as Opportunity 2000 will enable the number of women man
agers to reach a self-sustaining critical mass. Women managers have made strides for.
‘ward in the last eecade. Perhaps with many companies waking up to the necessity of re-
taining all good employees, more will also learn to use the full potential of their women
as managers in order to benefit both the corporate and the national economies
Ethical Problems and Concerns in CI
Along, with the tremendous market opportunities in China are some ethical prob-
lems for MNCs doing business there. After the violent, June 1989 crackdown on
the student protestors in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square, many questioned whether
any business should be conducted there until more freedom and human rights,
were restored. As.a result, many MNCs pulled out or have not gone into China
Despite the ethical implications stemming from Tiananmen Square, many
MNCs were, and still are, attracted to the competitive advantages offered by
China, One of these advantages is the low cost of labor. Companies as nearby a8
Hong Kong and as far away as the United States have found this cheap labor at
tractive, In the case of Hong Kong, a severe labor shortage and strict labor laws
have made it difficult to meet mounting work demands in industries such as
clothing and toy making. In the case of US. manufacturers, many toy makers have
subcontracted their work to the Chinese, because labor is such a large percentage
of their overall costs.
Factory workers in China are not well paid, and to meet the demand for out
put, they often are forced to work 12 hours a day, 7 days a week. In some cases,
children are used for this work and are paid very litte, usually only one-half of an
adult's wages. The government also has been using prison labor to produce goods
for the export market.* In addition, since China recently has opened up to the out
side world and there has been a rush to get rich under the market economy re
forms, there has been a dramatic increase in crime and illegal business activities”
These developments have led to friction between the U.S. Congress and China,
and they have resulted in continual efforts by the Senate to impose conditions on
the renewal of China's favorable trade status with the United States." During the
1990s, the personal support of Presidents Bush and Clinton have been needed to
ensure that China's most favored nation trade status remained intact."
Piracy and Counterfeit Problems The US. government is taking a harder line
oon Chinese piracy of intellectual property. In the case of music recordings, pirated
sales in recent years were 265 percent greater than retail sales of these products,
as shown in Figure 17-1. This makes China the largest pirate of this intellectual
property in the world. Industry analysts also believe that 90 percent of computer
software in China has been pirated from USS. firms; the same is true fora host ofCHAPTER 17: ETHICS AND SOCIAL ResPONSLTY 491
PIRATE SALES OF MUSIC RECORDINGS AS A
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL UNIT SALES; 1999
Pate uit sales, m
France
Bian
Canada
United States
Hoenn
Gemany
Australia
Argentina
lodia
hay
Bran
Hungary
Souci Arabia
Thalahs
china
Mexico
es 20 ers) oo ees On)
Sales of Music Recordings
Total Unit Sales, 1999
‘Soarcrremaonal Federation ate Pronographie di
other electronic and technological offerings. The accompanying sidebar, “Getting
Tough... Or Else,” gives some specific examples ofthis huge pirating problem.
Although, to date, words are louder than actions, the Chinese government keeps
promising to crack down on piracy, and a number of high-ranking people within
China want to see copyright laws enforced, One recent report noted
Reformist officials have told American businessmen privately that they would like
China's copyright laws enforced. This camp includes officials at the influential State
Science and Technology Commission as well, presumably, as the foreign-trade min-
ister, Wu Li, These people have little quarrel with America’s demands that China's cus-
toms officials should be given more power, that taskforces should be created in the
Provinces to deal with property, and that the intellectual-property courts should be492 PARTS: INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT HORZONS
ee,
Get Tough... or Else
A growing number of multinationals are very concerned
about doing Business in China, and they have good rea-
son to be. Within hours ofthe time their goods are on the
street, many find that counterfeiters are already working
ton developing their own version of the product—and in
many cases, these clones look just like the original. To-
dy, there are fake cans of Coca-Cola, fake MeDonald's
hamburger restaurants, fake versions of the Jeeps that
Chrysler manufactures with a joint-venture partner in
Beijing, and fake Gillette razor blades.
‘One of the most disconcerting things for foreign
MNCS in China is that counterfeiters often are blatantly
obvious in ther efforts. One good example isa fast-food
restaurant in downtown Shanghai about 100 yards from
‘4 MeDonald’s outlet, This restaurant uses a sign with
golden arches on a red background in a way that makes
it look like a McDonald's. Lawyers for McDonald's say
they are looking into taking legal action.
Even more disconcerting is that when counterfeiters
are caught, the Chinese government often does very it
Ue about it.The Gillette Razor Blade Company is a good
example of this. The Huaxing Razor Blade Factory was
proclucing Gillette look-alike blades and packaging them
in the same blue package as that used by Gillette. After
Chinese authorities raided the factory, they fined the
company $3500 and told management that it was illegal
to produce counterfeit blades and they swere to stop. Five
‘months later, when it became evident that the company
‘was still manufacturing the blades, there was a second
raid, followed! by a fine of $3300. At that time, the man-
ager was asked why he not only kept producing the
blades but also used the same packaging as before, He
remarked that he didnot want to throw aay packaging
that had already been printed. "We didnt want to was
it” he sal
Will sucha “slap on the writ” type of enforcement
stop the counterfeiting? Thisis unlikely, because the ns
are small compared withthe revenues being generate
The Chinese government also does not seem fo be
interested in fling sterner measures. Infact tn sone
Cases sehen MNCs have complained that counterets
have gone back otheirold ways, inspectors have refused
to take any adliinal action, anguing that “we aleady
addressed that sce an we ae now moving ont othe
matters” Such an atitude worres MNCs, Beause they
fel there iso protection for their ntllectial properties
Alawyer who has represented several US. companies a
trademark disputes in China putt tis wy.
I most counties, if you have 10 pirates, you ean
10 after one, expect seven to stop, and then figure
ut how to get the remaining two. But in China,
when you go after one the other nine see exactly
what you're doing, Not only do they keep pirating,
but you invite 10 more to join in
Unless the government of China takes more stringent
steps to do something about pirating and counterfeiting,
MNCS likely will take action of their own. One of the
'most commonly mentioned steps isto demand that Chi-
nove exports to the United States be limited and that
levies be assessed! on these goods to offset the loss of rev-
tenues being sustained by the US. MNCs. In the final
analysis, it appears that China will have to get tough on
pirates and counterfeiters... or else
‘made friendlier to the plaintiff. They know that China's own companies, such as soft
ware producers, need protection from pirates."
Until safeguards such as these become a reality, China will continue to be a hot
bed of pirating and counterfeit activities—and MNCs will proceed with caution
when doing business there.
‘The Status of Women Managers in China As in other countries, women mam
agers in China confront a “glass ceiling” when trying to reach top management
ranks, There are a number of reasons for this, including cultural stereotypes, 7
stricted opportunities, and of course, discrimination.
Cultural stereotypes are deep-rooted and very prevalent in China, and they 8°
a long way toward hindering women’s preparation for managerial roles as well aS
=CHAPTER 17; ETHICS AND SOCIAL RESPONSIALTY 493
their more direct opportunities for promotion. Women have been socialized to be
shy and unassertive. As a result, they often are viewed as being unprepared to.as-
sume leadership positions. A common stereotype is that Chinese women are dis-
organized, narrow-minded, and hard to-work with compared to men.” Such
widespread thinking greatly inhibits the advancement of women in management.
Coupled with this are restricted opportunities. For example, Chinese women
are not well represented in the Communist party, which is one of the fastest ways |
to gain upward mobility. Additionally, Chinese women are less likely to be chosen
for education and training programs, again restricting their opportunity to enter
the upper-managerial ranks. In particular, women typically are required to have
higher test scores on university entrance exams to ensure their admission. They
also face segregation on the job and, as a result, often end up with the less mean-
ingful tasks. For example, men typically operate the high-tech equipment and
processes, while women do the routine work. i
Discrimination in the work place is both blatant and subtle. For example,
women often are given additional workplace favors, such as extra rest periods, i
bat in turn, these serve as the basis for bypassing them for promotions, which go
instead to men who work longer hours. Additionally, women are required to re- 5
tire at the age of 60, while men can work until 65. This inhibits their career ad- |
vancement and helps to prevent them from reaching senior management posi- {
tions, Drawing together many of these perceptions and stereotypes, Korabik has |
summed up the series of interviews that she conducted with women managers in
the People's Republic of China by noting:
Stereotypes in China are particularly insidious because no research exists to show them ha
tobe inaccurate. Many Chinese therefore believe them to represent the “true” nature of I
women and men. Government campaigns to eradicate such stereotypes have been
largely ineffective, and their consequences are often not redressed because they are not \ \
viewed as discriminatory. Thus, despite many laws intended to insure equality in the
workplace, Chinese women managers are still at a disadvantage compared to men.” l
REGULATING FOREIGN INVESTMENT ( i
‘The regulation of foreign investment is another area of international business that | i
\|
‘tas at least indirect implications for ethics and social responsibility. Many coun-
tries have a growing concern regarding the ethies of an MNC’s gaining an eco- i
nomic foothold and then taking the resources and profits back home. This concern i
focuses on reciprocity between the home country of MNCs and the host country.
The United States again provides a good example. The latest available data reveal
that foreigners have invested triple-digit billions in the United States, and US. in-
vestments abroad also are in triple-digit billions. Moreover, foreign investors have |
Put more money into this country than US. investors have put overseas.
The rapid increase of foreign investment in the United States has raised ethical
concerns among many Americans, who believe that such foreign investment needs i
‘o be regulated more closely." In addition, some are concerned that countries like i
Japan seem much more interested in selling to the United States than in buying. lth
fom US. firms. These concerns have ethical and social responsibility implications,
and they have led to regulation of acquisitions and reciprocal trade agreements in
the United States."? Other countries are following the U.S. lead by also looking,
™ore closely at these two areas and how they affect their own country.494 PARTS: INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT HORIZONS
Regulation of Acquisitions
In the United States, under preliminary regulations published by the Treasury De.
partment, most foreign investors now must obtain formal approval before acquir.
ing a US. company. The primary exceptions are industries such as toys and
games, food products, hotels and restaurants, and legal services. Acquisition re-
quests are reviewed by the interagency Committee on Foreign Investment, which
is made up of eight agencies and headed by the Treasury Department. The stated
objective of the regulation is to prevent foreign firms from gaining control of US,
businesses that are important to US. security
Although at first glance this regulation might appear to be a major barrier to
acquisitions by overseas investors, its scope is really quite restricted, and it applies
to only a small number of deals. The Treasury Department estimates that fewer
than 170 acquisitions a year are covered by this regulation; however, as noted in
the following analysis, there can be far-reaching consequences:
‘The proposed regulations subject acquisitions, including those that have already been
completed since the bill was passed, to divestiture over an indefinite period. They pro-
vide that a transaction could be dissolved any time should a foreign investor fail to no-
tify the Government, provide false and misleading information oF omit material infor-
‘mation. Foreign investors could also become subject to the law if under an acquisition
loan agreement, a default would allow then to step in and control the company
Other countries are following the US. lead and implementing similar regula-
tory practices. For example, many Third World nations now refuse to allow MNCs
to establish new operations or purchase ongoing businesses unless they first ob-
tain governmental clearance. This ensures that the government remains in control
of the economy and is not overly reliant on foreign companies. In practice, how=
ever, many of these countries need MNC operations and are willing to accede to
most requests for setting up, acquiring, or expanding local operations.
‘The countries in the European Union also are beginning to limit the business
dealings of foreign multinationals. In particular, in the EU new regulations are
making it more difficult for MNCs not located in Europe to do business there.
‘The EU, except for England, is particularly sensitive to the rise of Japanese indus-
trialism and the likelihood that Japanese auto manufacturers will dominate the
world market. The BU also is trying to support local companies by mandating that
certain parts and equipment, such as computer chips, that are to be sold in Europe
also be built there by firms from the EU. ;
‘These regulatory developments show that countries around the globe are con-
cemed about the increasingly large amount of foreign investment being made in
their economies. This is particularly true in the case of those nations that are
viewed as nonreciprocal trade partners, or those which sell goods to others but do
not buy from them.
The Implications of Reciprocity
Is there an ethical and social responsibility to engage in reciprocal trade? This
question is atthe forefront of current trade talks between many counties, but e5-
pecially between the United States and Japan. How much of an obligation does
Japan have to import US. goods and services in light of its tremendous volume
of exports to the United States? Every year, the Japanese have massive trade(CHAPTER 17; ETHICS ANO SoC RESPONSIBLITY 495
curpluses with the United States. The 1990s provide an excellent example. Despite |
some success in reducing barriers in areas stich as tobacco and telecommunica-
tions and the weakening of the dollar against the yen, the annual trade deficit re-
mained in the $50 to $60 billion range in the mid 1990s.
In recent years, the executive branch has undertaken a review of US-Japanese
trade relations. One primary source of information for the analysis was a Volummi-
nouis report prepared by a special task force consisting of members from both gov
emment and business. The group recommended a l-year trial period during
which trade negotiations would be conducted with Japan. Ifno substantive results }
were achieved, the group suggested using Super 301, which is a provision of the
Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 that allows for sanctions against
“unfair traders.”
In the past few years, the United States has targeted Japan and Brazil, among
others, for retaliatory action. Whether or not retaliatory action will work, the im
portant thing to remember is that the United States feels itis unethical and iere-
sponsible for countries such as Japan and Brazil to behave in trade relations as
they do. Most European countries disagree with the United States and believe
there are more effective ways of negotiating trade problems than the use of sanc-
tions. However, as long as the US. administration believes that the United States
is not being treated ethically in the international trade arena, retaliation will con-
tinue to be a means to obtain reciprocity in international trade
Remember that many critics of Japan point to the fact that Japan deserves such
retaliation, that Japan refuses to do business with many outside companies, and
that Japan stacks the deck so that all the cards are favorable to its self-interest. A
second argument in favor of a retaliatory stance against Japan focuses on the fact
that the Japanese often buy foreign businesses such as hotels. Then, when the ;
Japanese travel abroad, they stay at these hotels and Japan recaptures funds that if
otherwise would flow into the international community. One report described this i
process as follows
Japan's well-heeled travelers ... prefer neatly wrapped package tours when they go i
abroad. The Tokyu group, another retailing conglomerate, provides such services by i
funneling vacationers through an affiliated travel agency to Toky’s 15 Pacific Basin re
sors, hotels, and condominiums. An aieine partially owned by Tokyu fies vacationers
to the holiday complexes. Joining the retailers in going global ae Japan’ aieines. In ad- '
dition to managing 23 Nikko hotels, JAL uses its reservations network to book passen-
Bers into 90 other affiliated Nikko hotels. The airline is also developing five overseas re- .
Sorts. Rival All Nippon Airways manages seven overseas hotels, from China to
California, and is scouting for more... And a hefty chunk of profits will end up in
Japanese coffers.®
Another reason to support retaliation against Japan is that many countries al-
ready have sought and reached joint trade agreements with the United States. The
argument goes that if Japan were serious in its efforts, it would have done so as
Well. For example, as early as 1987, South Korea had reached an agreement with
the United States to increase imports from the United States by $2.6 billion and to
buy a wide range of products, from supercomputers to grain. South Korea also al-
lowed the import of USS. computers a year ahead of schedule, cut financing to ex-
porters to restrain exports, and pledged to create a service network for imported
US. machinery. Similarly, Taiwan cut tariffs on a wide variety of products, from
farm goods to footwear. Taiwan also allowed U.S. insurance companies to enter its496
PARTS; INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT HORZONS
market, liberalized restrictions on foreign banks, and gave some USS. firms con.
tracts for building the Taipei subway." By offering concessions, countries are more
likely to placate the United States, which often is their largest international mar.
ket, and to ensure there is no trade backlash. There is recent evidence that the
years of US. pressure on Japan are beginning to pay off. By the mid 1990s, with
only a few exceptions, such as rice imports, foreign companies no longer are to-
tally excluded by law, regulation, or tariff from doing business in Japan."
RESPONSE TO SOCIAL OBLIGATIONS
So far, the discussion has focused on differences in ethical standards between
countries and why nations such as the United States are concerned about trade
reciprocity. However, many countries are responsive to their international social
obligations. For example, the United States is leading the way in pushing for
higher ethical codes, and others, such as Italy, which has had a tradition of cor-
ruption, are putting forth considerable effort to clean things up.* Japan is work-
ing hard to help Third World countries deal with their economic problems as well.
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
During the special prosecutor's investigation of the Watergate scandal in the early
1970s, a number of questionable payments made by U.S. corporations to publicof-
ficials abroad were uncovered. These bribes became the focal point of investiga-
tion by the Internal Revenue Service, the Securities and Exchange Commission
(GEC), and the Justice Department. Concern over bribes in the international busi
ness arena eventually culminated in the passage of the Foreign Corrupt Practices
‘Act (ECPA) of 1977, which makes it illegal to influence foreign officials through
personal payment oF political contributions. The objectives of the FCPA were to
Stop US. MNCs from initiating or perpetuating corruption in foreign government
and to upgrade the image both of the United States and U.S. businesses abroad.”
Some critics of this legislation feared the loss of sales to foreign competitors, &-
pecially in those countries where bribery is viewed as a way of doing business
Nevertheless, the US. government pushed ahead and attempted to enforce the
act. Some of the countries that were named in early bribery cases included Alge
ria, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey, although the State Department strived to
convince the SEC and the Justice Department not to reveal the names of countries
or foreign officials involved in its investigations for fear of creating internal polt-
ical problems for US. allies. Although, for the most part, this political sensitivity
‘was justified, a couple of interesting developments were: (I) MNCs found they
could live within the guidelines set down by the FCPA; and (2) many foreign gO%
ferments actually applauded these investigations under the FCPA, because it
helped them crack down on corruption in their own country.
One analysis reported that since passage of the FCPA, U.S. exports to “bribe
prone” countries actually have increased. Investigations reveal that once bribes
vere removed as a key competitive tool, more MNCs were willing to do business
in that country. This proved to be true even in the Midalle East, where many US.
MNCS always had assumed that bribes were required to ensure contracts.
On the other hand, this does not mean that bribery is a thing of the past. Ae
cent report issued by the US. Commerce Department contends that since 19%CHAPTER 17: ETHICS AND SOCIAL RESPONSUTY 497
foreign companies have used bribes to edge out U.S. MNCs on some $45 billion of Ht
international business deals. The report describes a case of bribery involving the {
contract for a power-generating plant in Central Europe as follows:
A European company was awarded the multimillion-dollar contract even though the
Central European government's own review board had recommenced the contract be
awarded to a US. firm. The report says there was clear evidence that a power-company
official had been given acash bribe by the European company that won the contract. The
company used the same practice to win other contracts in Eastern and Central Europe,
according to the report”
|
These recent experiences reveal that bribery continues to be a problem for US.
MNCs. At the same time, to comply with the provisions of the FCPA, US. firms
tmust be careful nat to follow suit and resort to bribery themselves. This advice
also is useful for multinational managers doing business in the United States. The
US. government has been vigorous in its prosecution of bribery and kickback
schemes, and one example would be the recent case of Honda employees who
‘were officals of American Honda. They were involved in an illegal program to so-
licit bribes from Honda auto dealers in exchange for ensuring thatthe dealers had
a steady supply of cars. The scheme, which lasted from the late 1970s until 1992, \
involved American Honda executives who received cash, Rolex watches, and
swimming pools in exchange for their awarding franchises or larger allotments of
hot-selling Accords and other cars. The highest-ranking executive in the scheme
wwas given 5 years in federal prison and fined $364,000; other convicted employees
received lesser, but still significant, sentences"
International Assistance
Besides fighting corruption, another way to meet social responsibilities has been
to provide assistance to underdeveloped countries. For many years, this foreign
aid has taken the form of food, machinery, and equipment to help feed the people
of Third World countries and stimulate their economies. During the 1970s in par-
ticular, many less-developed countries attempted to improve their conditions by
borrowing large sums of money for economic development. In most cases, the
tmonies were not wisely spent, and the countries now are having difficulty meet-
ing their debt obligations. Poland, for example, has foreign debis in double-digit, i
billions and very little hope of paying back this money. Mexico and South Amer-
ican countries such as Peru, Argentina, and Brazil are no better off. As a result, 1,
some of the economic superpowers recently have been calling for assistance to
these countries. Two primary avenues are under investigation: (1) debt reduction
or renegotiation; and (2) direct grants.
‘The United States and Japan are the two leading proponents of international
aid, Some Americans have called for a Third World debt reduction plan, and the i
Japanese government has proposed a package worth $43 billion designed to im-
Prove the global environment and spur economic growth in countries suffering,
Under the burden of poverty and indebtediness.* Some specific parts of the Japa-
nese package include: (1) low-interest loans to other countries; (2) grants to spe-
sitic nations in sub-Saharan Africa; and (3) a 3-year program of grants and credits
for environmental needs, including tree planting and helping poor people to find
alternatives to cutting down trees for fuel and fodder.* These decisions will affect498 PARTS: INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT HORIZONS:
MNCS, because they will help to stimulate world economies and open up market
for more goods and services.
‘Another form of ad is being carried out by MNCs themselves. Multinationals
are beginning to realize that they must take steps to ingratiate themselves ints
countries where they do business. A philanthropic role can pragmaticaly hel
protect their investments, improve their corporate image, and help meet theirs
cial responsibilities, The Japanese are a good example. When Prime Minist
Nokasone made derogatory remarks about U'S, Aftican-Americans and Hispary
ies, Japanese foundations and companies in the United States tried to minimize
the damage by increasing their donations to funds that help to promote Alriear:
American college students and similar groups. Honda, which was the target of 4
racial discrimination suit over hiring practices in Ohio, became a big donor toon
ganizations such as the Clara Hale House in Harlem and has provided a scholan
ship for minority students at Duke University. Mazda has been giving $70,000 an.
nally to the United Way, and Hitachi America has given $30,000 to a local library
Quite clearly, these Japanese MNCs understand the long-run benefits of phn
thropy. As one observer pointed out: “In coming years, Japan's role as philan:
thropist in the U;S. is destined to grow, perhaps even to explode. Cleatly, the
tracks needed to roll ut major fundraising drives and manage large projects have
been laid down, American institutions are certain to benefit, and Corporate Japan
should, too.”
US. and European multinationals follow similar philanthropy patterns. Quite
clearly, MNC assistance directed at host countries is a two-way street. Each
side stands to benefit economically through MNCs’ meeting their social responsi.
bilities
‘SUMMARY OF KEY POINTS
1. Ethics isthe study of morality and standards of conduct. Iti important in the study of
international management because ethical behavior often varies from one county 0 a
‘other: For example, in recent years in Japan, political and business scandals and appar
ent cases of avoiding minority hiring have drawn attention to the need for another look
; at ethical and socially responsible behavior. Japan’s lobbying efforts in Washington also
: have been questioned from an ethical standpoint.
2 Research in France and Germany reveals that European and US. MNCs seem to have
different standards of ethics that result in different types of decisions and business prac-
tices. For example, U.S. MNCs do not believe in bribing businesspeople or politicians to
sain favors, while some studies find that more respondents in samples of both German
and French managers were not as concerned with bribes as being unethical and instead
felt payolfs were merely a cost of doing business. Inthe area of equal opportunity for
‘women, the Europeans have goals for fully integrating women into the work force and
even recent EU legislation to ensure equal pay and equal treatment in employment
However, similar to US. women, European women are still being deprived af equal op-
portunities and are underrepresented in the managerial ranks of European firms, a
though some progress is being made.
3. Ethics also is a problem in countries such as China, Since the violent crackdown at
‘Tiananmen Square, many MNCs have questioned whether they should do any business
with the Chinese. Those that found the low labor cost atractive 100 often overlooked the
fact that the Chinese factory employees work long hours for very low pay and that some
of these workers are political prisoners. These types of exploitive practices have ethical
implications, $0, to0, does the status of women managers. As in many other countries,CHAPTER 17: ETHICS AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY 499°
women managers in China face a “glass ceiling” blocking their advancement into top
ranagement. Three of the main reasons are cultural stereotypes, restricted opportuni-
ties, and discrimination.
‘4, Amore indirect area of ethics and social responsibility deals with the regulation of for-
ign investment, In the United States, for example, the interagency Committee on For
ign Investment, which involves eight agencies headed by the Treasury Department,
‘eabset up to curb the indiscriminant buying of US. firms by foreign investors. The com
rnittee regulates the acquisition of U.S. companies by foreign multinationals. A similar,
{indirect area of ethics and social responsibilty is reciprocal trade and the desire of coun
tries such as the United States to get trading partners such as Japan to open their mar
kets to US. goods.
During the 1990s, multinationals likely will become more concerned about being socially
responsive, and legislation such as the US. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act is forcing the
issue. Other countries also ate passing laws to regulate the ethical practices of their
MNCs, MNCS are being more proactive (often because they realize it makes good busi-
ress sense) in providing international assistance in the form of philanthropy and direct
involvement as wel.
KEY TERMS
ethics Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)
nonreciprocal trade partners
REVIEW AND DISCUSSION QUESTIONS i
1. What lessons can U.S. multinationals learn fom the political and bribery scandals in
Japan that can be of value to them in doing business in this country? Discuss two.
2 Inrecent years, some prominent spokespeople have argued that those who work for the
US. government in trade negotiations should be prohibited for a period of 5 years from. hy
‘accepting jobs as lobbyists for foreign firms. Is this a good idea? Why? 1
3. How do ethical practices differ among the United States and European countries such as
France and Germany? What implications does your answer have for U.S. multinationals
‘operating in Europe?
4. Why are many MNCS reluctant to produce or sell their goods in China? What role can.
the Chinese government play in helping to resolve this problers?
5. In what way is trade reciprocity an ethics or social responsibility issue? How important i
is this issue likely to become during the current decade?
6 Why are MNCs getting involved in philanthropy and local communities? Are they dis 1
playing a sense of social responsibility, or is this merely a matter of good business? De-
fond your answer.
PRACTICAL INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT ASSIGNMENT
‘Choose any ethical or social responsibilty-related topic from this chapter, then go tothe lic <)
brary and update the topie by finding out what has taken place in recent months. Weite a
brief essay deseribing your findings, and share them with the other students in the class.
What conclusions can you draw as a result of your investigation?