Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
com
The correlation between salivary and serum cortisol levels in the healthy population
Medrech
Abstract:
Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the correlation between salivary and serum cortisol
levels in the healthy population.
Methods: 30 healthy women and men, aged from 22 to 53 years old, were included in our study.
All the participants were healthy, without any known disease. Two samples of salivary and
serum cortisol were collected from all the participants in the study, in the morning and in the
afternoon, before and after work. The mean age was 33 14 SD years old. 60% (18) were
females and 40% (12) were males. All the participants were within normal weight range, the
mean BMI was 23.5 kg/m. All the subjects followed the rules of salivary sample collection.
Results: The mean age of the healthy subjects was 33 14 years old. The mean baseline
morning cortisol level of the study population was 159.6 ng/ml (SD: 41.7; normal range 55-230
ng/ml, 8:00 AM) and the mean salivary cortisol level in the morning was 3.2 g/dL (SD: 2.4
g/dL; normal range 1-11.3 g/dL). After work, at 4:00 PM, the mean baseline serum cortisol
was 100.1 ng/ml (SD: 30.7; normal range 28-140 ng/ml) and the mean salivary cortisol level
after work was 1.21 g/dl (SD: 0.59; normal range 0.2-2.7 g/dl). Baseline salivary cortisol
correlated significantly with serum salivary cortisol before and after work; at 8:00 AM and 4:00
PM; p <0.05 in the morning and p< 0.0001 after work. The Pearsons coefficients were 0.44 in
the morning and 0.7 in the afternoon.
Conclusions: In our study we found a correlation between salivary and serum cortisol levels in
both samples, in the morning and in the afternoon. The salivary cortisol levels correlated
significantly with the serum cortisol levels (r = 0.44, p< 0.05 in the morning and r = 0.7, p
<0.00.1 in the afternoon).
Keywords: salivary cortisol, serum cortisol, correlation.
91
Introduction:
The measuring of cortisol is a very good
diagnostic test, which is used for the
diagnosing
of
the
hypoor
hypercortisolemic conditions. But because
of the variation of the secretion of cortisole
and its circadian rhythm, in practice a single
level of cortisol measured in the serum
makes it difficult to interpretate if it is or not
a normal level, therefore there rises the need
of other diagnostic methods for the
interpretation of the serum cortisol levels.
Free cortisol in serum:
Because of the expensive and not so
diffused in practice techniques, the
measuring of the free cortisol in serum is not
used frequently in practice (1, 2, and 3). The
free cortisol in serum diffuses easily in the
saliva. The concentration of the salivary
cortisol does not depend on the afflux of the
saliva (4, 5). The measuring of salivary
cortisol is a very good non-invasive
diagnostic test. The samples from the saliva
can be collected from the individual itself at
home. The measuring of salivary cortisol is
a preferable diagnostic test in the evaluation
of the hypotalamus-pituitary axis in the
conditions of endogenous hypo- or
hyperfunction. The level of the cortisol
measured at midnight (late night salivary
cortisol) has excellent sensitivity and
specificity for diagnosing Cushing syndrome
(6, 7, and 8). Salivary cortisol corresponds
with the free cortisol in serum. Since it is
difficult to measure free cortisol in serum,
this makes the use of salivary cortisol
practicable in the clinical use. The collection
of the salivary sample is done after first
rinsing the mouth, but without using a brush
to wash the teeth. The collected saliva can
be stored for some days even in room
temperature (9). The salivary cortisol is
especially important for the ambulatory
The correlation between salivary and serum cortisol levels in the healthy population
92
Pearsons
Mean salivary
cortisol
Mean serum
cortisol
Pearsons
coefficient
Morning (08:00
AM)
3.2 g/dl
159.6 ng/ml
0.44
p <0.05
Afternoon
(04:00 PM)
1.21g/dl
100.1 ng/ml
0.7
p< 0.0001
93
94
Discussion
In our study we compared serum and
salivary cortisol levels in the healthy
persons, our group of control. Even in
previous studies other authors have
performed in selected populations, they
compared the salivary and serum cortisol
levels and studied them even during the
stimulation test (13) or during the exercises
(14).
We found a statistically significant
correlation between salivary and serum
cortisol levels, but our study had some
limitations: We needed to perform the study
in a bigger number of participants, the
samples of salivary and serum cortisol
should have been collected even in late night
hours and there should have been collected
more samples during the day. We needed to
evaluate the salivary and serum cortisol
levels in obese people without any known
disease, since our population in the study
had normal body mass index and compare
women and men levels and difference
between women using oral contraceptive
compared
to
women
not
using
contraceptives. Also our population in the
study was of young age and we needed to
evaluate our study even in other ages, as in
children and older adults.
Conclusions:
In our study we found a correlation between
salivary and serum cortisol levels in both
samples, in the morning and in the
afternoon. The salivary cortisol levels
correlated significantly with serum cortisol
levels (r = 0.44, p< 0.05 in the morning and
r = 0.7, p <0.00.1 in the afternoon).
References:
1- Ballarg PL, Carter JP, Graham BS,
Baxter JD. A radioreceptor assay for
evaluation of the plasma glucocorticoid
activity of natyral and sintetic steroids in
man. J Clin Endorinol Metab 1975;
41(2): 290-304.
The correlation between salivary and serum cortisol levels in the healthy population
95
96