Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
PFMEA Number:
Process Name:
Process Responsibility:
Prepared By:
Affected Product(s):
PFMEA Key Date:
PFMEA Origination Date:
PFMEA Revision Date:
Core Team Members:
Process / Product
Failure Modes and Effects Analysis
(FMEA)
Process or Product
Name:
Prepared by:
Responsible:
Pnuemonia
patient recieves
1st medication
Delay in receiving
medicine
Survival rate
lessened - increased
recovery period or
death
10
Medication not
available from hospital
10 pharmacy-2 hour
delay for supply from
affiliate hospital
Medical office
completes
reimbursement
form
Reimbursement sent
to rework. Customer
contacted; customer
payment delayed 730 days.
Codebook distributed to
all client medical offices.
No inspection prior to
recipt at payer.
D
E
T
R
P
N
Recommended
Action(s)
What are the actions for
reducing the occurrence,
or improving detection,
or for identifying the root
cause if it is unknown?
Should have actions
only on high RPN's or
easy fixes.
Responsibility
and Completion
Date
D
E
T
R
P
N
Who is responsible
for the
recommended
action?
Cross-train ER
personnel to run lab
350 tests - 15 minute delay
3 night shift
techncians trained
& certified May 15
108
Arnold Cejka
(Pharmacy Clerk)
Pharmacomp alert
changed to 5
patient supply
10
120
40
240
Action Results
S
O
Actions Taken E
C
V
C
405
Program changed
& distributed - Jan
23
Current
Process
Controls
Potential Cause(s)/ O
Mechanism(s) of C
Failure
C
S
E
V
Potential Effects
of Failure
Potential Failure
Mode
Process
Function
FMEA Master
Process / Product
Failure Modes and Effects Analysis
(FMEA)
Process or
Product Name:
Prepared by:
Responsible:
Page 3
Recommended
Action(s)
What are the actions for
reducing the occurrence, or
improving detection, or for
identifying the root cause if it is
unknown? Should have
actions only on high RPN's or
easy fixes.
Responsibility
and
Completion
Date
Who is
responsible for
the
recommended
action?
Action Results
Actions Taken
List the completed actions
that are included in the
recalculated RPN.
Include the implementation
date for any changes.
S
E
V
O
C
C
D
E
T
R
P
N
Recomkpute RPN after
actions are complete.
R
P
N
D
E
T
Current
Process
Controls
O
C
C
Potential Cause(s)/
Mechanism(s) of Failure
S
E
V
Potential Effects
of Failure
Process
Function
Extreme
High
Moderate
Low
None
Severity of Effect
May endanger machine or operator.
Hazardous without warning
Rating
10
No effect
Likelihood of Occurrence
Very
High
Moderate
High
1 in 2
Failure is almost inevitable
Re- Very
Low
mote Low
Failure
Rate
1 in 3
1 in 8
1 in 20
1 in 80
Process is in statistical control but with isolated failures.
Previous processes have experienced occasional
failures or out-of-control conditions.
1 in 400
1 in 2000
1 in 15k
1 in 150k
1 in 1.5M
Capability
(Cpk)
Rating
< .33
10
> .33
> .51
> .67
> .83
> 1.00
> 1.17
> 1.33
> 1.50
> 1.67
Very
Low
DPPM
100,000
50,000
Moderate
High
10,000
Very
High
Low
5,000
2,000
1,000
500
200
100
Probability Rating
1 in 10
10
1 in 20
1 in 50
1 in 100
1 in 200
1 in 500
1 in 1,000
1 in 2,000
1 in 5,000
1 in 10,000
Measurement
Technique
%R&R or P/T
Ratio
Upper
Spec
Limit
Target
Lower
Spec
Limit
Cp
ble
Cpk
Sample
Size
Date
Actions
Date:
Revision:
Product:
Process:
Process Step
Employee
Status
Change Form
What's
Controlled?
Status
Change
indicator
Measurement
Method
Mgr Review
HR Inspection
List Select
New Dept
List Select
New Grade
List Select
New Salary
Grade Guidelines
Mgr Review
New Mgr
Org Chart
Mgr Review
Change Effect
Date
None
Mgr Review
HR Inspection
Mgr Review
HR Inspection
Mgr Review
HR Inspection
Sample Size
Frequency
Who/What
Measures
Where
Recorded
Decision Rule/
Corrective Action
100%
As Needed
Mgr, HR
Clerk
HR Checklist
100%
As Needed
HR Checklist
100%
As Needed
HR Checklist
100%
As Needed
Mgr
100%
As Needed
Mgr
100%
As Needed
Mgr, HR
Clerk
HR Checklist
Mgr, HR
Clerk
Mgr, HR
Clerk
Approved by:
Approved by:
Approved by:
SOP's
9.3012
9.3012
9.3012
9.3012
9.3012
9.3012