Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Objective: To evaluate the role of hyaluronic acid (HA) for sperm selection before intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).
Design: Three prospective studies.
Setting: Private assisted reproduction center in Italy.
Patient(s): Study 1: 20 men. Study 2: 15 men. Study 3: 206 couples treated with ICSI on a limited number of
oocytes per patient (13) in accordance with Italian IVF law.
Intervention(s): Study 1: determination of sperm DNA fragmentation of HA-bound spermatozoa versus spermatozoa in polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP). Study 2: assessment of nuclear morphology of HA-bound spermatozoa
versus spermatozoa in PVP. Study 3: randomized study comparing conventional PVP-ICSI to ICSI in which the
spermatozoa are selected for their capacity to bind to HA (HA-ICSI).
Main Outcome Measure(s): Study 1: sperm DNA fragmentation rate. Study 2: sperm nucleus normalcy rate
according to motile sperm organellar morphology examination criteria. Study 3: fertilization, embryo quality
and development, and implantation and pregnancy.
Result(s): Spematozoa bound to HA show a significant reduction in DNA fragmentation (study 1) and a significant
improvement in nucleus normalcy (study 2) compared with spermatozoa immersed in PVP. Furthermore, injection
of HA-bound spermatozoa (HA-ICSI) significantly improves embryo quality and development (study 3).
Conclusion(s): Hyaluronic acid may optimize ICSI outcome by favoring selection of spermatozoa without DNA
fragmentation and with normal nucleus. Furthermore, HA may also be used to speed up the selection of spermatozoa with normal nucleus during intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI). (Fertil
Steril 2010;93:598604. 2010 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
Key Words: Hyaluronic acid selection, physiologic ICSI, sperm selection, HA-ICSI, sperm DNA fragmentation,
MSOME, IMSI, PICSI
598
0015-0282/10/$36.00
doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.033
Parmegiani et al.
TABLE 1
Study 1: Determination of sperm DNA fragmentation.
Group 1:
Initial semen sperm
Group 2:
Spermatozoa
after swim-up
Group 3:
Spermatozoa
in PVP
Group 4:
Spermatozoa
bound to HA
1,655
1,100
442
214
10,000
10,000
4,000
4,000
16.5%a
11.0%b
11.0%c
5.3%d
Spermatozoa with
fragmented DNA
Total no. of spermatozoa
analyzed
DNA fragmentation rate
spermatozoa) and six oligozoospermic (<20 106/mL spermatozoa) according to the WHO criteria (20).
DISCUSSION
The selection of ideal spermatozoa before injection may
optimize the outcome of ICSI treatments. It has been demonstrated that sperm dimension and shape, when observed with
conventional magnification for ICSI (40), are not reliable
attributes for prediction of chromatin integrity or the absence
or presence of numerical chromosomal aberrations (21). The
injection of aneuploid spermatozoa may be the cause of an
increased incidence of sex chromosome aberrations in ICSI
offspring (22, 23). Furthermore, oocyte fertilization with
spermatozoa with damaged DNA may lead to an increased
risk of pregnancy loss (5). Sperm selection becomes critical
when a limited number of oocytes are available for injection,
as in Italy where insemination of no more than three gametes
is allowed by law (6).
TABLE 2
Study 2: Sperm nucleus normalcy (MSOME criteria).
Spermatozoa in PVP
Spermatozoa bound to HA
165
1,500
11.0%a
218
1,500
14.5%a
Note: MSOME motile sperm organelle morphology examination; other abbreviations as in Table 1.
a
P .013, PVP versus HA.
Parmegiani. Sperm selection with hyaluronic acid. Fertil Steril 2010.
601
TABLE 3
Study 3: PVP-ICSI versus HA-ICSI.
No. treatments
Mean female age SE at oocyte retrieval
Fertilized oocytes (%)
Grade 1 embryos (%)
Mean embryo development rating SE
No. of embryo transfers
Clinical pregnancy rate per transfer (%)
Implantations (%)
Abortions (%)
No. of live births
PVP-ICSI
HA-ICSI
107
37.1 0.4
236/275 (85.8)
55/228 (24.1)a
84.0 1.1c
105
22/105 (20.9)
23/226 (10.2)
4/22 (18.2)
19
125
37.5 0.4
304/332 (91.6)
101/282 (35.8)b
95.0 0.8d
125
31/125 (24.8)
35/282 (12.4)
6/31 (19.3)
29
Parmegiani et al.
REFERENCES
1. Huszar G, Celik-Ozenci C, Cayli S, Zavaczki Z, Hansch E, Vigue L.
Hyaluronic acid binding by human sperm indicates cellular maturity,
viability, and unreacted acrosomal status. Fertil Steril 2003;79(Suppl 3):
161624.
2. Cayli S, Jakab A, Ovari L, Delpiano E, Celik-Ozenci C, Sakkas D, et al.
Biochemical markers of sperm function: male fertility and sperm selection for ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online 2003;7:4628.
3. Huszar G, Jakab A, Sakkas D, Celik-Ozenci C, Cayli S, Delpiano E, et al.
Fertility testing and ICSI sperm selection by hyaluronic acid binding:
clinical and genetic aspects. Reprod Biomed Online 2007;14:65063.
4. Jakab A, Sakkas D, Delpiano E, Cayli S, Kovanci E, Ward D, et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a novel selection method for sperm with
normal frequency of chromosomal aneuploidies. Fertil Steril 2005;84:
166573.
5. Zini A, Boman JM, Belzile E, Ciampi A. Sperm DNA damage is associated with an increased risk of pregnancy loss after IVF and ICSI: systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2008;23:26638.
6. La Sala GB, Villani MT, Nicoli A, Valli B, Iannotti F, Blickstein I. The
effect of legislation on outcomes of assisted reproduction technology:
lessons from the 2004 Italian law. Fertil Steril 2008;89:8549.
7. Avery SM. Laboratory techniques: sperm preparation for assisted conception. In: Brindsen P, ed. In vitro fertilization and assisted reproduction. 2nd ed. New York: Parthenon, 1999:206.
8. Van Steirteghem AC, Nagy Z, Joris H, Liu J, Staessen C, Smitz J, et al.
High fertilization and implantation rates after intracytoplasmic sperm
injection. Hum Reprod 1993;8:10616.
9. Fernandez JL, Muriel L, Rivero MT, Goyanes V, Vazquez R, Alvarez JG.
The sperm chromatin dispersion test: a simple method for the determination of sperm DNA fragmentation. J Androl 2003;24:5966.
10. Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Yaari S, Katz N, Barr I, Fishman A, et al. The morphological normalcy of the sperm nucleus and pregnancy rate of intracytoplasmic injection with morphologically selected sperm. Hum Reprod
2005;20:18590.
11. Bartoov B, Eltes F, Pansky M, Langzam J, Reichart M, Soffer Y. Improved diagnosis of male fertility potential via a combination of quantitative ultramorphology and routine semen analysis. Hum Reprod 1994;9:
206975.
12. Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Kogosowski A, Menezo Y, Barak Y.
Real-time fine morphology of motile human sperm cells is associated
with IVF-ICSI outcome. J Androl 2002;23:18.
13. Filicori M, Cognigni G. Roles and novel regimens of luteinizing
hormone and follicle-stimulating homone in ovulation induction.
J Clin Endocrin Metab 2001;86:143741.
14. De Sutter P, Dozortsev D, Qian C, Dhont M. Oocyte morphology does
not correlate with fertilization rate and embryo quality after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1999;11:5957.
15. Xia P. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: correlation of oocyte grade
based polar body, perivitelline space and cytoplasmic inclusion with
fertilization rate and embryo quality. Hum Reprod 1997;12:17505.
16. Ebner T, Moser M, Sommergruber M, Tews G. Selection based on
morphological assessment of oocytes and embryos at different stages
of preimplantation development: a review. Hum Reprod Update
2003;9:25162.
603
604
Parmegiani et al.
29. Sati LG, Ovari L, Demir R, Ward DC, Bray-Ward P, Huszar G. Persistent
histones in immature sperm are associated with DNA fragmentation and
affect paternal contribution of sperm: a study of aniline blue staining,
fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and DNA nick translation.
Fertil Steril 2004;82(Supp 2):S52.
30. Spano M, Cordelli E, Leter G, Lombardo F, Lenzi A, Gandini L. Nuclear
chromatin variations in human spermatozoa undergoing swim-up and
cryopreservation evaluated by the flow cytometric sperm chromatin
structure assay. Mol Hum Reprod 1999;5:2937.
31. Chohan KR, Griffin JT, Lafromboise M, De Jonge CJ, Carrell DT.
Comparison of chromatin assays for DNA fragmentation evaluation in
human sperm. J Androl 2006;27:539.
32. Nasr-Esfahani MH, Razavi S, Vahdati AA, Fathi F, Tavalaee M. Evaluation of sperm selection procedure based on hyaluronic acid binding
ability on ICSI outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet 2008;25:197203.
33. Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Kogosovsky A, Yagoda A, Lederman H,
et al. Pregnancy rates are higher with intracytoplasmic morphologically
selected sperm injection than with conventional intracytoplasmic injection. Fertil Steril 2003;80:14139.
34. Antinori M, Licata E, Dani G, Cerusico F, Versaci C, DAngelo D, et al.
Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection: a prospective
randomized trial. Reprod Biomed Online 2008;16:83541.
35. Hazout A, Dumont-Hassan M, Junca AM, Cohen Bacrie P, Tesarik J.
High-magnification ICSI overcomes paternal effect resistant to conventional ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online 2006;12:1925.
36. Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Yaari S, Katz N, Barr I, Fishman A, Bartoov B. The
morphological normalcy of the sperm nucleus and pregnancy rate of
intracytoplasmic injection with morphologically selected sperm. Hum
Reprod 2005;20:18590.
37. Menezo Y, Nicollet B. Replacement of PVP by hyaluronate (SpermSlow)
in ICSIimpact on outcome. Eighteenth World Congress on Fertility
and Sterility, International Federation of Fertility Societies 2004.
38. Worrilow KC, Huynh T, Bower JB, Anderson AR, Schillings W,
Crain JL. PICSI vs ICSI: statistically significant improvement in clinical
outcomes in 240 in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients. Fertil Steril
2007;88(Supp 1):s37.
39. Sanchez M, Aran B, Blanco J, Vidal f, Veiga A, Barri PN, Huszar G.
Preliminary clinical and FISH results on hyaluronic acid sperm selection
to improve ICSI. Hum Reprod 2005;20(Supp 1):i200.