IN THE COURT OF 1ST SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, NAWABSHAH.

F.C.SUIT NO. 406 OF 2011.

Muhammad Rafi

.Plaintiff.

Versus.

Muhammad Wasi and others

..Defendants.

APPLICATION U/S 151 CPC

I do hereby submitted on behalf of defendants No. 1 & 5, a Civil Revision
No. 08 of 2013 title Muhammad Wasi & another V/s Muhammad Rafi & Others is
pending before the Honourable District Judge, Shaheed Benazir Abad.
I humbly prayed that this Honourable Court may be pleased stay the
proceeding of above matter till the decision of Civil Revision aforesaid.
This prayer is made in the interest of justice.

Nawabshah..
Dated:-

.
ADVOCATE FOR DEFENDANTS NO. 1 & 5.

IN THE COURT OF 2ND. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SHAHEED

BEANZIR ABAD.
FAMILY APPEAL No. 02

of 2009

Shafique Ahmed
.Appellant
Versus.
Mst. Shabana
..Respondent .

CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that I have received Rs.10,000/as professional fees in the appeal aforesaid being not
refundable.

Advocate for Respondents.

Nawabshah.
Dated:

IN THE COURT OF 2ND. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SHAHEED

BEANZIR ABAD.
L.ACQ. REF. NO. 07 OF 1994

Abdul Ghafoor.
.applicant.
Versus.
Assistant Commissioner & L. A. Officer & Others
..Opponents.

APPLICATION U/S 151 CPC.

It is prayed that this Honourable Court may be pleased to
allow opponent No.2 , to file Written Reply in the above matter on the
consideration of the facts and grounds mentioned in the accompanying
affidavit.

Advocate for opponent No.2

Nawabshah.
Dated: 21.12.2009

IN THE COURT OF 2ND. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SHAHEED

BEANZIR ABAD.
L.ACQ. REF. NO. 07 OF 1994
Abdul Ghafoor.
.applicant.
Versus.
Assistant Commissioner & L. A. Officer & Others
..Opponents.

AFFIDAVIT.
I, Imam Bux son of Darya Khan solangi, muslim, adult,
Estate Engineer, Hyderabad, now at Nawabshah, do hereby state on
oath as under :1).

That I am authorized officer on behalf of opponent No.2, and

aware of all the facts involved in this matter.

2).

That reference was filed in which we were not made party ,

ultimately we filed application U/S 12(2) CPC and the same was
allowed and Judgment and Decree was set-aside.
3).

That since the evidence of the applicants was already recorded,

who adopted their same evidence and we were directed to only cross
examine the said witnesses, which we did , but due to oversight and
bonafide mistake formal Written Reply were not submitted in the
matter.
4).

That the written reply were not internally or deliberately not filed

but the same could not be filed due the reasons mentioned above.
5).

That we shall suffer irreparable loss if accompanying application

U/S 151 CPC is not allowed.

6).

That justice requires that accompanying application may be

allowed.
Whatever stated above is true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belie.
Deponent.

I know the Deponent.

Advocate.

IN THE COURT OF IST. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, NAWABSHAH.

F.C.SUIT NO. 72 OF 2009.

Mirza Siddique Ahmed

.Plaintiff.

Versus.

Mushtaque Ahmed and others

..Defendants.

APPLICATION U/S 151 CPC.

It is prayed on behalf of the plaintiff that this honourable court may be
pleased to extend status quo Order till further orders.
This prayer is made in the interest of justice.

Nawabshah.
Dated:-19.11.2009.
ADVOCATE FOR PLAINTIFF.

IN THE COURT OF

SENIOR JUDGE, HYDERABAD.

F.C.S NO.

OF 2008.

Syed Saeed Abbas Taqvi Son of Syed

Dr. S.M Younus Taqvi, Muslim, Adult,
Resident of house No. G- 2665/9/1, Islam
Nagar, Phulleli Par, Hyderabad.
.plaintiff.
Versus.
1.. Syeda Naseem Akhtar widow of late
Syed Altaf Hussain Rizvi [ since dead]
Throug her LRs:[a] Syed Sallar Hussain Rizvi Son
[b] Syeda Zainab Akhtar Rizvi Doughter
Both Muslim, adult, Resident of Galli No. 7,
Mandi Sheikhan, Mour, Emanabad, Tehsil and District Gujranwala.
2. Syed Sallar Hussain Rizvi son of
Syed Altaf Hussain Rizvi, Muslim, Adult,
Resident of Galli No. 7, Mandi, Sheikhan,
Mour Emanabad, Tehsil and District Gujranwala
3. Syed Abrar Hussain Rizvi son of
Syed Iftikhar Hussain Rizvi, Resident
of 14-B Ali Block, Awan Town, Lahore.
4. City Survey Officer, Hyderabad
5. Sub Registrar Hyderabad
6. House Building Finance Corporation Thandi
Sarak Hyderabad,Through its Manager.
7. Province of Sindh to be served through District Officer[ Revenue]
Hyderabad

..Defendants.

SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE AND INJUNCTION.

Advocate for Plaintiff

It is prayed on behalf of the plaintiff that this honourable court may be

pleased to grant permission to withdraw the suit aforesaid to file a fresh in
respect of the same subject matter on the consideration of the grounds
mentioned in accompanying affidavit.

Dated:-21.05.2008.

ADVOCATE FOR PLAINTIFF.

IN THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, NAUSHAHRO FEROZE.

F.C.S NO.

OF 2008.

Abdul Rahim

.plaintiff.
Versus.

Mst. Khalida Parveen and others

A F F I D A V I T.

..Defendants.

I, Noor Muhammad S/o Abdul Rahim Memon, Muslim, adult, R/o House
No.B-199 , near Imam Bargah, Mohni Bazzar, Nawabshah, do hereby state on
Solemn affirmation as under:1.

That I am plaintiff hence fully conversant with the facts of the present suit.

2.

That there are some formal defects occurred in filing the suit which can

not be rectified otherwise.

3.

That some prayers have also been left to be mentioned which are

necessary to be inserted therefore to avoid from other lengthy process

accompanying application is filed.
4.

That relief of compensation for the occupation and separate possession in

the suit has not been sought for which shall deprive the plaintiff of valuable rights
to the property.
5.

That I shall suffer serious loss and injury if my accompanying application

U/O XXIII rule 1 CPC is not allowed which would likely to lead to multifarious
litigation.
Whatever stated above is true and correct to the best of knowledge and
belief.
I know the deponent.
Deponent.
Advocate.

IN THE COURT OF SECOND SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, NAWABSHAH.

C.A No.3 of 2008 in F.C.S NO. 2 OF 2008.

Sikandar Ali & others

.Applicants/plaintiffs.

Versus.

Sajjad Farooque and others

..Contemnors/Opponents.

APPLICATION U/0 17 R1 CPC

It is prayed on behalf of Contemnor/Opponent No.1 that this honourable
court may be pleased to hold over the mater as I have been engaged in the
matter today and have to have the instructions from my client.
This prayer is made in the interest of justice.

Dated:-22.02.2008.
ADVOCATE FOR CONTEMNERS/OPPONENTS 1.

IN THE COURT OF SECOND SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, NAWABSHAH.

F.C.SUIT NO. 2 OF 2008.

Sikandar Ali & others

.Plaintiffs.

Versus.

Sajjad Farooque and others

..Defendants.

APPLICATION U/0 17 R1 CPC

It is prayed on behalf of defendants No.1 and 2 that this honourable court
may be pleased to hold over the mater as I have been engaged in the matter
today and have to have the instructions from my clients.
This prayer is made in the interest of justice.

Dated:-22.02.2008.
ADVOCATE FOR DEFENDANTS 1 & 2.

IN THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, SANGHAR.

F.C.SUIT NO.45 OF 2007.
Muhammad Haneef S/o Lal Khan Brohi by caste,
Muslim, adult, r/o Chak No.46 Deh Sadrat,
Taluka and District Sanghar.
.Plaintiff.
Versus.
1. Niaz S/o Haneef Jatt by caste, Muslim,
adult, R/o Chak No.50, Taluka and District
Sanghar.
2. Mukhtiarkar Land Revenu, Sanghar.
3. Tapedar Deh Sadrat, Taluka Sanghar.
4. S.H.O, Police Station Mangli.
5. Province of Sindh, Through Secretary
Land Revenue Department, Govt. of Sindh,
Karachi.
6. Mst. Marvi D/o Qutub Din, muslim,adult,
aged about 14 years, through her guardian
-ad-litem Kamaluddin S/o Jiando Khan,muslim,
adult, by caste Shar, Zamindar, R/o Village
Jiando Khan Shar, Taluka Sanghar.
7. Ghullam Sarwar S/o Rais Haji Kamaluddin,
muslim,adult, by caste Shar, P.O Chak NO.41,
Taluka and District Sanghar.
..Defendants.

SUIT FOR DECLARATION & PERMANENT

INJUCTION.

A P P L I C A T I O N.
It is prayed on behalf of the plaintiff that this honourable court may be
pleased to grant certified true copy of application dated:- 04.01.2008 and order
passed thereon as per usual costs.
Sanghar.

Sd/-

ADVOCATE FOR PLAINTIFF.

Dated:- 16.01.2008.

Order:Status quo granted till next date of hearing viz.

Sd/Senior Civil Judge, Sanghar.
Copyed by:Compared by:-

IN THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, NAWABSHAH.

F.C.SUIT NO. 70 OF 2006.

Ali Hassan & others

.Plaintiffs.

Versus.

Yousaf-ul- Hassan and others

..Defendants.

APPLICATION U/S 151 CPC

It is prayed on behalf of the plaintiffs that this honourable court may be
pleased to extend status quo Order as the same was discontinued for not filing
the extension application on the consideration of the grounds mention in
accompanying affidavit.
This prayer is made in the interest of justice.

Sanghar.
Dated:-22.11.2007.

ADVOCATE FOR PLAINTIFF.

IN THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, SANGHAR.

F.C.SUIT NO. 02 OF 2007.

Mst. Naseem Akhtar & others

.Plaintiffs.

Versus.

Syed Khalid Ali Bukhari and others

..Defendants.

APPLICATION.
It is prayed on behalf of the plaintiff that this honourable court may be
pleased to extend status quo Order till further orders.
This prayer is made in the interest of justice.

Sanghar.
Dated:-22.11.2007.
ADVOCATE FOR PLAINTIFF.

IN THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, SANGHAR.

F.C.SUIT NO.45 OF 2007.

Muhammad Haneef

.Plaintiff.

Versus.

Niaz and others

..Defendants.

APPLICATION U/S 151 CPC.

It is prayed on behalf of the plaintiff that this honourable court may be
pleased to extend status quo Order till further orders.

This prayer is made in the interest of justice.

Place: Sanghar.
Dated:-16-07-2008.
PLAINTIFF.

IN THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, SANGHAR.

F.C.SUIT NO.45 OF 2007.
Muhammad Haneef S/o Lal Khan Brohi by caste,
Muslim, adult, r/o Chak No.46 Deh Sadrat,
Taluka and District Sanghar.
.Plaintiff.
Versus.
1. Niaz S/o Haneef Jatt by caste, Muslim,
adult, R/o Chak No.50, Taluka and District
Sanghar.
2. Mukhtiarkar Land Revenu, Sanghar.
3. Tapedar Deh Sadrat, Taluka Sanghar.
4. S.H.O, Police Station Mangli.
5. Province of Sindh, Through Secretary
Land Revenue Department, Govt. of Sindh,
Karachi.
6. Mst. Marvi D/o Qutub Din, muslim,adult,
aged about 14 years, through her guardian
-ad-litem Kamaluddin S/o Jiando Khan,muslim,
adult, by caste Shar, Zamindar, R/o Village
Jiando Khan Shar, Taluka Sanghar.
7. Ghullam Sarwar S/o Rais Haji Kamaluddin,
muslim,adult, by caste Shar, P.O Chak NO.41,
Taluka and District Sanghar.
..Defendants.

SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND

PERMANENT INJUCTION.
APPLICATION U/S 151 CPC.
It is prayed on behalf of the plaintiff that this honourable court may be
pleased to extend status quo Order till further orders.
This prayer is made in the interest of justice.
Place: Sanghar.
Dated:-16.07.2008.

sd/PLAINTIFF.

ORDER
Status quo extended till next date of hearing viz:

.07.2008

Sd/- 16.07.2008

Senior civil judge, Sanghar

Copied by
Compared by

IN THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, SANGHAR.

F.C.SUIT NO.45 OF 2007.

Muhammad Haneef

.Plaintiff.

Versus.

Niaz and others

..Defendants.

A P P L I C A T I O N.

It is prayed on behalf of the plaintiff that this honourable court may be

pleased to grant certified true copy of application dated16.07.2008 and order
passed thereon as per usual costs.

Sanghar.
Dated:-16.07.2008.

PLAINTIFF.