Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
All praise is to Allah, Lord of the Worlds, the Beneficent, the Merciful and every grace of Allah is
on His Prophet Muhammad (P.B.U.H), who is always a source of knowledge and guidance for
humanity as a whole
.
INDEX
CHAPTER
CONTENTS
01
Introduction
02
Literature Review
03
Operation Principle
04
Discussion on Yarn
Properties to Be
Compared
05
Experimental Details
06
07
Conclusion
08
References
PAGE
NO.
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
Textile education is based on Industrial ground. The project work is an important subject matter
of Textile Technology. Here one has to change or create a new idea or to modify an old thing or
conception. So for successful completion of our four years graduate degree in textile
engineering we should give special emphasis on this topic.
The title of our project is Comparative study on ring & rotor yarn properties. It is a special
type of project work as it is an observing and analytical project work. It is very much important
in this time because although ring spinning machine produces best quality yarn but some
limitations specially limited productivity bounds the spinners to choose alternative spinning
system. From the multitude of spinning processes developed in recent decades, e.g. Bobtex,
Repco, Twilo, friction, air-jet and wrap spinning, only rotor spinning and with reservations airjet spinning have established themselves successfully on the market.
In our project work we observed the various yarn properties like U%., CV%, index, thin/km,
thick/km, neps/km, hairiness and strength (CSP).
Aim of the project
The main object of the project is to study the yarn properties (Um%, CVm%, Imperfection,
Hairiness etc) of Ring & Rotor spun yarn and compare between them.
To observed how yarn properties are change with the change of process.
To analyze the various yarn properties by the graphical representation.
To learn how to do a project work and report.
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1
Development of Spinning
Seven thousand years ago spinning was already well established as a domestic craft. At that
time and until the early Middle Ages spinning was an incredibly slow and tedious task.
Throughout this period the spinning of one pound of cotton into a yarn suitable for the weaving
of what we would now regard as a fairly heavy apparel fabric would keep as spinner busy for
several weeks.
A revolutionary change had come in spinning when ring spinning machine was invented by an
American named Thorp in 1828, and Jenk another American added the traveler rotating
around the ring in 18301. In the intervening period of more than 170 years the ring spinning
machine has undergone considerable modification in detail, but the basic concept has
remained the same. For many years any noteworthy further development hardly seemed
possible, yet a significant process of evolution took place during this time. The productivity of
the ring spinning machine has increased by 40% since the late nineteen-seventies. This has
been achieved by using smaller ring and cop formats introducing piecing in the winding
department substantial improvements in rings and travelers.
Commercial rotor spinning began in 1967 in Czechoslovakia1. Rotor spinning has been
characterized from the outset by incomparably higher production potential than ring spinning
This potential has been steadily increased by the continuous rise in rotor and winding speeds.
Rotor-spun yarns have therefore always been successful where they could be manufactured
more cheaply than ring-spun yarns and proved suitable for the range of application in question.
2.2
For ring spinning most important fiber property is staple length. It can be assumed that fibers
of under 4-5 mm will be lost in processing (as waste and fly), fibers up to about 12-15 mm do
not contribute much to strength but only to fullness of the yarn, and only those fibers above
these lengths produce the other positive characteristics in the yarn.
Second important property is fiber fineness. The fineness determines how many fibers are
present in the cross-section of a yarn of given thickness. Additional fibers in the cross-section
provide not only additional strength but also better evenness in the yarn.
Strength is very often the predominant characteristic. This can be seen from the fact that
nature produces countless types of fibers, most of which are not usable for textiles because of
inadequate strength. The minimum strength for a textile fiber is approximately 6 cN/tex (about
6 km breaking length). Since binding of the fibers into the yarn is achieved mainly by twisting,
and thus can exploit only 30 - 70% of the strength of the material, a lower borderline of about 3
cN/tex is finally obtained for the yarn strength, the minimum strength of a yarn.
The open-end rotor-spinning system is especially suitable for short-staple fibers (1 inch).
Because staple length is limited by rotor diameter & smaller dia of rotor is required for higher
rotational speed2.
= .
However the most important fiber properties for rotor spun yarn is fiber fineness. Because for
core twist structure fiber strength is less exploited in rotor spun yarn than in ring spun yarn
(about 20-40% less)2. So more fiber is required in yarn cross section. Usually fibers of 2.8-4.5
Mic are used.
2.3
Spinning limit is determined by minimum number of fiber in yarn cross section required to
produce yarn. Spinning limit for various processes3:
Ring-spun yarn: carded
Ring-spun yarn: combed
Open-end rotor
75
33
90
Ring spinning is suitable for finer count yarn whereas Rotor spinning is suitable for coarser
count yarn production.
2.4
Yarn Twist
Ring spun yarn contains envelope twist(twisting in the fibers from outside to inwards), whereas
rotor spun yarn has core twist(twisting in the fibers from inwards to outside). The fibers in the
envelop layer in the rotor spun yarn can partly escape twisting action during spinning and
therefore take up fewer turns of twist. So rotor spun yarn generally needs more turns of twist
than ring spun yarn2.
2.5
Yarn Properties
An experiment was done by Lnenschloss and Hummel4 on ring & rotor spun yarn. Their
conclusions were based on comparative trials in which American cotton was spun by both ring
and rotor (BD 200) systems. They showed that, despite the need for higher twist, the rotor yarn
was better in most respects, such as evenness, abrasion resistance, extensibility and reduced
hairiness, but the ring-spun yarn was stronger.
10
Another comparison of Ne 20, 100% cotton yarns, produced by 2 different spinning systems is
found in an Application Report5 of Uster Tester 5 (Fig.02).
11
CHAPTER THREE
OPERATION PRINCIPLE
12
Blow room
Carding m/c
Simplex
Ring Frame
Auto-coner
13
Blow room
Carding m/c
Lap former
Comber
Simplex
Ring Frame
Auto-coner
14
Blow room
Carding m/c
Draw Frame
Rotor Spinning m/c
15
16
Sliver feed: A card or draw frame sliver is fed through a sliver guide via a feed roller and
feed table to a rapidly rotating opening roller.
Sliver opening: The rotating teeth of the opening roller comb out the individual fibers
from the sliver clamped between feed table and feed roller. After leaving the rotating
opening roller, the fibers are fed to the fiber channel.
Fiber transport to the rotor: Centrifugal forces and a vacuum in the rotor housing
causes the fibers to disengage at a certain point from the opening roller and to move via
the fiber channel to the inside wall of the rotor.
Fiber collection in the rotor groove: The centrifugal forces in the rapidly rotating rotor
cause the fibers to move from the conical rotor wall toward the rotor groove and be
collected there to form a fiber ring.
Yarn formation: When a spun yarn end emerges from the draw-off nozzle into the rotor
groove, it receives twist from the rotation of the rotor outside the nozzle, which then
continues in the yarn into the interior of the rotor. The yarn end rotates around its axis
and continuously twists-in the fibers deposited in the rotor groove, assisted by the
nozzle, which acts as a twist retaining element.
17
Yarn take-off, winding: The yarn formed in the rotor is continuously taken off by the
delivery shaft and the pressure roller through the nozzle and the draw-off tube and
wound onto a cross-wound package. Between takeoff and package, several sensors
control yarn movement as well as the quality of the yarn and initiate yarn clearing if any
pre-selected values are exceeded.
18
CHAPTER FOUR
DISCUSSION ON YARN
PROPERTIES TO BE COMPARED
19
20
Characteristics
3.1.1. "UNEVENNESS" OR "IRREGULARITY":
The mass per unit length variation due to variation in fiber assembly is generally known as
"IRREGULARITY" or "UNEVENNESS". It is true that the diagram can represent a true reflection of
the mass or weight per unit length variation in a fiber assembly. For a complete analysis of the
quality, however, the diagram alone is not enough. It is also necessary to have a numerical
value which represents the mass variation. The mathematical statistics offer 2 methods:
a) Irregularity U%: It is the percentage mass deviation of unit length of material and is caused
by uneven fiber distribution along the length of the strand.
a = shaded area
= mean value
Xi = mass value at a given point in time
L = test length
21
s = standard deviation
= mean value
L = test length
Relation between CV & U:
=
= 1.25
:
= 1.25
c) Index of Irregularity: Index of irregularity expresses the ratio between the measured
irregularity and the so-called limiting irregularity of an ideal yarn.
Let, CVlim = the calculated limit irregularity
CV= the actual irregularity
22
3.1.2. Imperfections:
Yarns spun from staple fibers contain "IMPERFECTIONS". They are also referred to as
frequently occurring yarn faults. They can be subdivided into three groups
a) Thick places: Thick places lie in the range of +50% with respect to the mean value of
yarn cross-sectional size and their length ranges from 4-25mm.
b) Thin places: Thin places lie in the range of -50% with respect to the mean value of
yarn cross-sectional size and their length ranges from 4-25mm.
c) Neps: Neps lie in the range of +200% (+280% for OE rotor yarn) with respect to the
mean value of yarn cross-sectional size and their length is about 1mm.
The reasons for these different types of faults are due to raw material or improper preparation
process.
Imperfection Index= Thick (+50%)/km + Thin (-50%)/km + Neps (ring +200% & rotor +280)/km
23
3.2 Hairiness:
The hairiness H corresponds to the total length of protruding fibers divided by the length of the
sensor of 1 cm. The hairiness is, therefore, a figure without a unit.
24
CHAPTER FIVE
EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS
25
Ring spinning
100% cotton (CIS Uzbekistan)
28 mm
4.1 Mic
70 grain/yard
0.78 Ne
4.3
20 Ne
Rotor spinning
100% cotton (CIS Uzbekistan)
21mm
4.3 Mic
70 grain/yard
4.7
20 Ne
II.
26
CHAPTER SIX
27
Ring spun
yarn(Carded)
Rotor spun
yarn
Mass
variation
U%
11.03
10.17
CVm%
13.81
12.68
Imperfection
Thin(-50%)/km
3.0
6.3
Thick(+50%)/km
98.0
32.8
Neps(+200%)/km(Ring);
(+280%)/km(Ring)
135.2
24.7
IPI
236.2
63.8
5.37
4.75
Sh
1.15
1.19
2300
1750
Hairiness
Strength (CSP)
28
6.2 Discussion
5.2.1 Comparison of mass variation:
Evenness of Rotor spun yarn is higher than ring spun yarn. Both U% and CVm% is higher in ring
spun yarn.
Mass variation
16
14
12
10
8
Ring
Rotor
6
4
2
0
U%
CVm
Fig 09: Comparison of mass variation between ring of rotor spun yarn
Roller drafting system is liable to produce more uneven yarn in ring spinning
and less irregularity in rotor spun yarn is the result of positive influence of
back doubling.
29
250
200
135.2
150
100
98
50
24.7
3
32.8
6.3
Ring
Rotor
Thin/km (-50%)
Thick/km (-50%)
30
4.9
4.8
4.7
4.6
4.5
4.4
Ring
Rotor
31
2000
1500
CSP
1000
500
0
Ring
Rotor
Strength of rotor spun yarn is lower due to its core twist structure.
32
Mass variation of Rotor spun yarn is about 8% less than Ring spun yarn.
IPI of Rotor spun yarn is about 73% less than Ring spun yarn.
Hairiness of Rotor spun yarn is 12% less than Ring spun yarn.
Strength of Rotor spun yarn is 24% less than Ring spun yarn.
120
100
80
60
Ring
Rotor
40
20
0
Mass variation
Imperfection
Hairiness
Strength
Yarn Properties
Fig 13: Comparison of all yarn properties of rotor spun yarn with ring yarn
33
CHAPTER SEVEN
CONCLUSION
Except strength all the properties of rotor spun yarn is better than ring spun yarn. However,
though rotor spinning is more economic than ring spinning but still now it does not become an
alternative of ring spinning except its vast application in short staple(1 inch) spinning.
34
CHAPTER EIGHT
REFERENCES
1.
2.
3.
4.
www.rieter.com
W. Klein; Manual of Textile Technology; Vol.5; New Spinning System
W. Klein; Manual of Textile Technology; Vol.1; Short Staple Spinning
Lnenschloss, J., and Hummel, E.; 1968. Comparative studies on open-end and ring-spun
yarns.
5. U_T5_S800_The_measurement_of__the_yarn_diameter.pdf
6. Application Handbook of UT5