Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Design of Water Treatment Plant for Water of Kaushalya Dam on river Ghaggar for city of
Panchkula
Submitted by
Arshdeep Singh
12102054
Aditya Aggarwal
12102068
Hritik Walia
12102075
DECLARATION
I hereby declare that the project work entitled Design of Water Treatment Plant for water of Kaushalya Dam on river Ghaggar for
city of Panchkula is an authentic record of my own work carried out at "" as requirement of six month capstone project for the
award of degree of B.E. (Civil Engineering), PEC University of Technology, Chandigarh, under the guidance, during January to
May, 2016.
Hritik Walia
Date: 11/5/2016
Certified that the above statement made by the student is correct to the best of our knowledge and belief.
(12102075)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The success and final outcome of this project required a lot of guidance and assistance from many people and we are extremely
fortunate to have got this all along the completion of our project work. Whatever we have done is only due to such guidance and
assistance and we would not forget to thank them.
We respect and thank Shakti Arora sir, for giving me an opportunity to do this project work and providing all support and guidance
which made me complete the project on time . We are extremely grateful to him for providing such a nice support and guidance.
CONTENTS
1. Introduction..................................................................4
1.2 Sources of water.................................................................4
1.3 Characteristics of water................................................................4
1.4 Study Area .....................................................................7
1.5 Objectives............................................................8
Intake canal..................27
Coarse Screens.............28
Pump for lifting water.................29
Primary Sedimentation Tank.............30
Clariflocculator with secondary sedimentation............31
Filtration by Rapid Gravity Sand Filter............34
Underdraiange..............35
Wash water trough..................37
Disinfection.......................38
7. References............40
1. INTRODUCTION
Growing demands for water and the increasing costs of water supply are resulting in a need for countries to maximize the use of their
existing water supplies and make use of hitherto unexploited resources. Numerous techniques , modem and traditional, for improving
the use and augmenting the availability of availability, of water resources have been developed and implemented in various parts of
the world. These include, among others, wastewater reuse and recycling, desalination and rain water harvesting. In many developing
countries, the application of these technologies has been limited by lack of information on the approaches available and how well
they work.
Water is pumped from wells, rivers, streams, and reservoirs to water treatment plants where it is treated and distributed to customers.
Wastewater travels through customers ,sewer pipes, wastewater treatment plants, where it is either treated and returned to streams,
rivers, oceans or reused for irrigation and landscaping. Operators in both types of plants control equipment and processes that
remove or destroy harmful materials, chemical compounds, and microorganism from re water. They also control pumps, valves, and
other equipment that moves the wafer or wastewater through re various treatment processes, after which they dispose of the removed
waste materials
Deep groundwater
2.
3.
4.
Atmosphere water generation is a new technology that can provide high quality drinking water by extracting water from the
Rainwater harvesting or fog collection which collects water from the atmosphere can be used especially in areas with
significant dry seasons and in areas which experience fog even when there is lithe ran.
Turbidity
2.
Colour
3.
4.
Temperature
5.
6.
pH
Table 1
SI No. Characteristic
(1) (2)
i)
Colour, Hazen units, Max
Requirement
(Acceptable
Limit)
(3)
5
ii)
Odour
Agreeable
Agreeable
iii)
iv)
pH value
Taste
6.5-8.5
Agreeable
No relaxation
Agreeable
v)
vi)
1
500
5
2 000
Table 2
Parameters
January
April
S1
S2
S1
S2
TEMPERATURE
14.9
15
22.5
23
pH
7.6
7.8
7.77
7.96
BOD
0.4
0.5
0.1
0.2
COD
3.8
4.5
4.8
TDS
210
210
158
159
TSS
Table 3
General Parameters Concerning Substances Undesirable in Excessive Amounts
Requirement
SI
No, Characteristic
Permissible Limit
in the Absence of
(Acceptable
Alternate Source
Limit)
(1) (2)
i)
ii)
(4)
0.03
(3)
0.5
0.2
No relaxation
0.2
1.0
iv)
0.7
No relaxation
0.5
75
4.0
1.0
200
No relaxation
viii)
ix)
x)
xi)
250
0.05
1.0
0.2
1 000
1.5
1.5
1
0.3
No relaxation
30
0.1
100
0.3
0.5
No relaxation
45
No relaxation
0.002
0.01
No relaxation
0.1
200
No relaxation
400
0.05
200
No relaxation
600
xxiii)Max
Total hardness (as CaC03), mg/1, Max
200
600
15
Pinjore,Haryana
Coordinates: 304630.93N, 765452.52E
Height
34 m (112 ft)
Length
700 m (2,300 ft)
1.4.2 History
The first plan, which never materialised, for a dam on Ghaggar river was first proposed by the British raj in the mid 19th century to
provide drinking water to Ambala Cantonment.
The proposal was revisited only in the 1960s to construct a dam on Ghaggar river at Gumthala near Chandimandir to provide water
to Chandigarh and control floods in Punjab, India, this plan was abandoned in 1999 as it would have submerged over 4000 acres of
land resulting in relocation of a large number of people.
In 2005, the revised plan to build series of smaller dams on the tributaries of Ghaggar river was approved by the Government of
Haryana and the construction of the Kaushalya dam commenced in 2008 which was completed in 2012.
1.4.3 Construction
Kaushalya dam, built by the Government of Haryana at the cost of INR217 crore, is a 700 meter long and 34 meter high earth-filled
dam.
1.4.4 Purpose
The Government of Haryana built this dam for providing 40 cusecs or 25 MGD (million gallons per day) of raw water to Panchkula
city, recharge ground water, check flash floods, promote tourism and fisheries in reservoir area.
1.4.5 Wildlife
It is an important wetland that is home of many endangered migratory birds.
Figure 2
1.5 OBJECTIVES
1. To understand the functioning and design of a water treatment plant
2. To practically calculate essential water quality characteristics of the River Ghaggar taking sample from Kaushalya Dam
3. To design the following parts of a water treatment process
a. An open channel
b. Coarse Screens
c. Pump for lifting and transporting water
d. Primary Sedimentation Tank
e. Flocculator
f. Rapid Sand Gravity Filter
g. Wash Water Troughs
h. Disinfection of water
Figure 0
10
1.
Pumping and containment - The majority of water must be pumped from its source or directed into pipes or holding tanks.
To avoid adding contaminants to the water, this physical infrastructure must be made from appropriate materials and constructed so
that accidental contamination does not occur.
2.
Screening - The first step in purifying surface water is to remove large debris such as sticks, leaves, trash and other large
particles which may interfere with subsequent purification steps. Most deep Groundwater does not need screening before other
purification steps.
3.
Storage - Water from rivers may also be stored in bankside reservoirs for periods between a few days and many months to
allow natural biological purification to take place. This is especially important if treatment is by slow sand filters. Storage reservoirs
also provide a buffer against short periods of drought or to allow water supply to be maintained during transitory pollution incidents
in the source river.
4.
Pre-conditioning - Many waters rich in hardness salts are treated with soda-ash (Sodium carbonate) to precipitate calcium
5.
Pre-chlorination - In many plants the incoming water was chlorinated to minimise the growth of fouling organisms on the
pipe-work and tanks. Because of the potential adverse quality effects, this has largely been discontinued.
2..3 SECONDARY'TREATMENT
There are a wide range of techniques that can be used to remove the fine solids, micro-organisms and some dissolved inorganic and
organic materials. The choice of method will depend on the quality of the water being treated, the cost of the treatment process and
the quality standards expected of the processed water.
1.
pH adjustment - If the water is acidic, lime or soda ash is added to raise the pH. Lime is the more common of the two
additives because it is cheaper, but it also adds to the resulting water hardness. Making the water slightly alkaline ensures that
coagulation and flocculation processes work effectively and also helps to minimise the risk of lead being dissolved from lead pipes
and lead solder in pipe fittings.
2.
Coagulation and flocculation - Together, coagulation and flocculation are purification methods that work by using
chemicals which effectively "glue" small suspended particles together, so that they settle out of the water or stick to sand or other
granules in a granular media filter. Many of the suspended water particles have a negative electrical charge. The charge keeps
particles suspended because they repel similar particles. Coagulation works by eliminating the natural electrical charge of the
suspended particles so they attract and stick to each other. The joining of the particles so that they will form larger settleable particles
is called flocculation. The larger formed particles are called floe. The coagulation chemicals are added in a tank (often called a rapid
mix tank or flash mixer), which typically has rotating paddles. In most treatment plants, the mixture remains in the tank for 10 to 30
11
seconds to ensure full mixing. The amount of coagulant that is added to the water varies widely due to the different source water
quality.
One of the more common coagulants used is aluminum sulfate, sometimes called filter alum. Aluminum sulfate reacts with water to
form floes of aluminium hydroxide.
Coagulation with aluminum compounds may leave a residue of aluminium in the finished water. This is normally about 0.1 to 0.15
mg/L. It has been established that Aluminium can be toxic to humans at high concentrations.
Iron (II) sulfate or iron (III) chloride are other common coagulants. Iron (III) coagulants work over a larger pH range than aluminum
sulfate but are not effective with many source waters. Other benefits of iron (III) are lower costs and in some cases slightly better
removal of natural organic contaminants from some coagulation with iron compounds typically leaves a residue of iron In the
finished water This may impart a slight taste to the water, and may cause brownish stains on porcelain fixtures. the trace levels of
iron are not harmful to humans, and indeed provide a needed trace mineral. Because the taste end stains may lead to customer
complaints. aluminium tends to be favoured over iron for coagulation
cationic and other polymers can also be used. They are often called coagulant aids used in conjunction with other inorganic
coagulants. The long chains of positively charged polymers can help to strengthen
the floc making it larger faster settling and easier to filter out The main advantages of polymer coagulants and aids are that they do
not need the water to be alkaline to work and that they produce less settled waste than other coagulants, which can raduce operating
costs The drawbacks of polymers are that they are expensive, can blind sand filters and that they often have a very narrow range of
effective doses.
3.
Flocculation - In flocculation coagulants are used but the resultant floe is settled out rather than filtered through sand fitters.
The chosen coagulant and the raw water is slowly mixed in a large tank called a flocculation basin. Unlike a rapid mix tank, the
flocculation paddles turn very slowly to minimise turbulence. The principle involved is to allow as many particles to contact other
particles as possible generating targe and robust floc particles. Generally, the retention time of a flocculation basin is at least 30
minutes with speeds between 0.5 feet and 1.5 feet per minute (15 to 45 cm / minute). Flow rates less than 0 5 ft/min cause
undesirable floe settlement within the basin.
4.
Sedimentation - Water exiting the flocculation basin enters the sedimentation basin, also called a ciarifier or settling basin. It
is a large tank with slow flow, allowing floc to settle to the bottom. The sedimentation basin is best located close to the flocculation
basin so the transit between does not permit settlement or floc break up. Sedimentation basins can be in the shape of a rectangle,
where water flows from end to end, or circular where flow is from the center outward. Sedimentation basin outflow is typically over
a weir so only a thin top layer-furthest from the sediment-exits. The amount of floc that settles out of the water is dependent on the
time the water spends in the basin and the depth of the basin. The retention time of the water must therefore be balanced against the
cost of a larger basin. The minimum clarifier retention time is normally 4 hours. A deep basin will allow more floc to settle out than a
shallow basin. This is because large particles settle faster than smaller ones, so large particles bump into and integrate smaller
particles as they settle. In effect, large particles sweep vertically though the basin and clean out smaller particles on their way to the
bottom.As particles settle to the bottom of the basin a layer of sludge is formed on the floor of tie tank This layer of sludge must be
removed and treated. The amount of sludge that Is generated is significant, often 3% 5% of the total volume of water that is treated.
The cost of treating and disposing of the sludge can be a significant part of the operating cost of a water treatment plant The tank
12
may be equipped with mechanical cleaning devices that continually clean the bottom of the tank or the lank can be taken out of
service when the bottom needs to be cleaned.
An increasingly popular method of floc removal is by dissolved air flotation, A proportion of clarified water, typical 5-10% of
throughput, is recycled and air is dissolved In It under pressure This is injected into the bottom of the clarifier tank where tiny air
bubbles are formed which attach themselves to the floc particles and float them to the surface. A sludge blanket Is formed which Is
periodically removed using mechanical scrapers. This method is very efficient at floc removal and reduces loading on filters,
however it is unsuitable for water sources with a high concentration of sediment,
5.
Filtration: After separating most floc, the water Is filtered as the final step to remove remaining suspended particles and
unsettled floc. The most common type of filter Is a rapid sand filter. Water moves vertically through sand which often has a layer of
activated carbon or anthracite coal above the sand. The top layer removes organic compounds Including taste and odour. The space
between sand particles is larger than the smallest suspended particles, so simple filtration Is not enough. Most particles pass through
surface layers but are trapped in pore spaces or adhere to sand particles Effective filtration extends into the depth of the filter. This
property of the filter Is key to its operation: If the top layer of s\and were to block all the particles, the filter would quickly clog. To
clean the filter, water is passed quickly upward through the filter, opposite the normal direction (called back flushing or
backwashing) to remove embedded particles. Prior to this, compressed air may be blown up through the bottom of the filter to break
up the compacted filter media to aid the backwashing process; this Is known as air scouring This contaminated water can be disposed
of along with the sludge from the sedimentation basin, or if can be recycled by mixing with the raw water entering the plant.
Some water treatment plants employ pressure filters. These work on the same principle as rapid gravity filters differing in that the
filter medium is enclosed in a steel vessel and the water Is forced through it under pressure.
6.
Slow sand filters may be used where there is sufficient land and space Those rely on biological treatment processes for their
action rather than physical filtration. Slow sand filters are carefully constructed using graded layers of sand with the coarsest at the
base and the finest at the top Drains at the bass convey treated water away for disinfection. Filtration depends on the development of
a thin biological layer on the surface of the filter. An effective slow sand filter may remain in service for many weeks or even months
if the pre-treatment is well designed and produces an excellent quality of water Which physical methods of treatment rarely achieve.
5.
Ultra filtration membranes are a relatively new development; they use polymer film with chemically formed microscopic
pores that can be used in place of granular media to filter water effectively without coagulants. The type of membrane media
determines how much pressure is needed to drive the water through and what sizes of micro-organisms can be filtered out.
13
Chlorine- The most common disinfection method is some form of chlorine or its compounds such as chloramine or chlorine
dioxide. Chlorine is a strong oxidant that kills many micro-organisms. Because chlorine is a toxic gas, there is a danger of a release
associated with its use. This problem is avoided by the use of sodium hypochlorite, which is a relatively inexpensive solid that
releases free chlorine when dissolved in water. Handling the solid, however, requires greater routine human contact through opening
bags and pouring than the use of gas cylinders which are more easily automated. Both disinfectants are widely used despite their
respective drawbacks. A major drawback to using chlorine gas or sodium hypochlorite is that they react with organic compounds in
the water to form potentially harmful levels of the chemical by-products trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids, both of which
are carcinogenic. The formation of THMs and haloacetic acids is minimised by effective removal of as many organics from the water
as possible before disinfection. Although chlorine is effective in killing bacteria, it has limited effectiveness against protozoans that
form cysts in water. (Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium, both of which are pathogenic).
2.
Chlorine dioxide to another fast acting disinfectant it is, however, rarely used, because it may create excessive amounts of
chlorate and chlorite, both of which are regulated to low allowable levels. Chlorine dioxide also poses extreme risks in handling: not
only is the gas toxic, but ft may spontaneously detonate upon release to toe atmosphere in an accident.
3.
Chloramines are another chlorine based disinfectant Although chloramines are not as effective as disinfectants compered to
chlorine gas or sodium hypochlorite, they are less prone to form THMs or haloacetic acids, it is possible to convert chlorine to
chloramine by adding ammonia to the water along with the chlorine The chlorine and ammonia react to form chloramine. Water
distribution systems disinfected with chloramines may experience nitrification, wherein ammonia is used a nitrogen source for
bacterial growth, with nitrates being generated as a byproduct'
4.
Ozone (O3) to a relatively unstable molecule of oxygen which readily gives up one atom of oxygen providing a powerful
oxidising agent which to toxic to most water borne organisms, ft to a very strong, broad spectrum disinfectant that to widely used to
Europe. It to an effective method to inactivate harmful protozoans that form cysts, it also works well against almost all other
pathogens. Ozone is made by passing oxygen through ultraviolet light or a ''cold'' electrical discharge. To use ozone as a disinfectant;
it must be created on site and added to the water by bubble contact. Some of the advantages of ozone include the production of
relatively fewer dangerous by-products (in comparison to chlorination) and the lack of taste and odor produced by ozonation.
Although fewer by-products are formed by ozonation, it has been discovered that the use of ozone produces a small amount of the
suspected carcinogen Bromate. Another one of the main disadvantages of ozone is that it leaves no disinfectant residual in the water.
Ozone has been used in drinking water plants since 1906 where the first industrial ozonation plant was built in Nice. France. The
U.S. Food and Drug Administration has accepted ozone as being safe, and it is applied as an anti-microbiological agent for the
treatment, storage, and processing of foods.
5.
UV radiation is very effective at inactivating cysts, as long as the water has a low level of colour so the UV can pass through
without being absorbed. The main drawback to the use of UV radiation is that, like ozone treatment, it leaves no residual disinfectant
in the water. Because neither ozone nor UV radiation leaves a residual disinfectant in the water, it is sometimes necessary to add a
residual disinfectant after they are used. This is often done through the addition of chloramines, discussed above as a primary
disinfectant.
14
3.1 CLARIFLOCULATOR
Clarifloculator contains following four units:
1.
Feeding Device
2.
Mixing Device
3.
Flocculation tank
4.
Sedimentation tank
The chemical coagulant is, first of all, fed into the raw water through the feeding device. This mixture is then thoroughly mixed and
agitated in the mixing basin. The floe which is formed as a result of chemical reaction taking place in the mixing basin is then
allowed to consolidate in the flocculation tank. The flocculated water is finally passed into the sedimentation tank where these
flocculated particles settle down and be removed. The resulted water of low turbidity can be taken out through the outlet of
sedimentation tank, directly to the rapid gravity filters. The complete process of coagulation - sedimentation may help in removing
turbidities up to as low values as 10-20 mg/l. it may also help in reducing the bacteria from the water and thus to reduce the B-Coli
index by as much as 70%.
3.2 FEEDING DEVICES
The chemical coagulant may be fed into the raw water either in powdered form or in a solution form. The former is known as dry
feeding and later is known as wet feeding. Wet feeding equipments are generally costlier than the dry feeding equipment, but they
have the advantage that they can be easily controlled and adjusted. The choice between these two types of equipments depends upon
the following factors :
1.
2.
3.
15
2.
Fig 1
Figure 3
16
4.1 FILTRATION
Screening and sedimentation removes a large percentage of the suspended solid and organic matter present in raw supplies. The
percentage of removal of fine colloidal matter increases when coagulants are also used before sedimentation. But, however, the
resultant water will not be pure and may contain some very fine suspended particles and bacteria present in it. To remove or to
reduce the remaining impurities further and to produce potable water, the water is filtered through beds of fine granular materials
such as sand etc. The process of passing tha water through the beds ot such granular materials (called filters) is known as Filtration.
Fltration may help in removing colour, odour, turbidity and pathogenic bacteria from the water.
Filtration is a process tor separating suspended and colloidal impurities from watar by passage trough a porous medium or porous
media. Filtration, with or without pretreatment, has been employed for treatment of water to eftectively remove turbidity (e.g. silt and
clay), colour, microorganisms, precipitated hardness from chemically softened waters and precipitated iron and manganese from
requirement ot aesthetic acceptability but also for efficient disinfection which is difficult in the presence of suspended and colloidal
impurities that serve as hideouts for the microorganisms.
Filters can be classified according to:
1.
2.
3.
4.
The filtration rate depending upon the direction of flow through filters, these are designed as down flow, up flow, bi flow, radial flow
and horizontal flow filters.
Based on filter media and beds, filters have been categorized into:
a)
b)
The granular medium filters include single -medium, dual -medium and multimedia (usually tri - medium) filters. The sand, coal,
crushed coconut shell, diatomaceous earth and powdered or granular
Activated carbon have been used as filter media but sand filters have been most widely used as sand is widely available, cheap and
effective in removing impurities. The deriving force to overcome the fractional resistance encountered by the flowing water can be
either the force of gravity or applied pressure force. The filters are accordingly referred to as gravity filters and pressure filters in the
fourth category are constant rate and declining or variable rate filters. Lastly dependent upon the flow rate, the filters are classified as
slow or rapid sand filters.
Filtration of municipal water supply is normally accomplished using:
a)
b)
Both of these types of filters are down flow, granular medium (single medium) gravity filters. The rapid sand filters have been
conventionally operated at constant rate of filtration.
Two types filter are generally used for the treatment of municipal supplies:
17
2.
3.
4.
Costs of building and running significantly lower than other disinfection methods
18
be terminated when the head loss reaches a predetermined value simultaneously with the suspended solids in filtrate attaining the
preselected of acceptable quality.
4.3.2 COMPONENTS OF A RAPID SAND GRAVITY FILTER:
[a] ENCLOSURE TANK:
It consists of an open watertight rectangular tank, made of masonry concrete. The depth of the tank may vary from 2.5 to 3.5 m. in
order to achieve the uniform distribution of water, the area of the filter unit should not be kept large, and is generally limited about 10
to 80 Sq.m for each unit. There should be at least two filter units in the plant. And for a plant of more than 9 million liters per day
capacity, no single unit should have a capacity greater than one-fourth the capacity of plant.
[b] FILTER MEDIA:
The filtering media consist of sand layers about 60 to 90 cm. in depth, and placed over a gravel support. The effective size (D10) of
the sand varies from 0.35 to 0.55 mm. And the uniformity coefficient (D60/ D10) generally ranges between 1.2 to 1.8 the sand must
be laid in layers. The finer variety towards the bottom.
[c] BASE MATERIALS:
The base material is gravel and is supports the sand. Besides this the sand also distributes the wash water. It consists of 60 to 90 cm
thick gravels of different sizes, placed in layers. In a rapid gravity filter, the distribution of wash water is the critical function of the
gravel layer and hence careful grading and equally careful placing of the materials is important.
Gravel is placed between the sand and the under drainage system to prevent sand from entering the under drains and to avoid uniform
distribution of wash water. The gravel should accomplish both purposes without being displaced by the rising wash water. Sizes of
gravel vary from 50 mm at the bottom to 2 to 5 mm at the top 0.45 m depths. The faster the rate of application of water, the larger the
gravel size required. Reference may be made to IS: 8419 Part (1) 1977 for filter gravel.
The depth will vary according to the type of filter bottom and the strainer system used, except in the case of porous bottom where no
gravel is required. Wheeler bottoms and other false bottoms may be substituted for part of coarser layer of gravel. The filter gravel
should be as spherical as possible, hard, clean and uniform in quality and also shall not contain such impurities as dirt and clay.
Size of gravel and depth of gravel layer shall be determined in accordance with the following rules:
a)
For strainer or wheeler type under drain system, gravel shall be of 2 mm minimum size, 50 mm maximum size and 0.30 m to
For perforated pipes under drain system, the gravel shall be of 2 mm minimum size, 25 mm maximum size and 0.50 m in
depth.
The filter shall be classified by sieves into four or more size grades, sieves being placed with the coarsest on the top and the finest at
the bottom.
[D] UNDER DRAINAGE SYSTEM:
The under drainage system serves two purposes:
1.
2.
19
The under drainage system of the filter is intended to collect the filtered water and to distribute the wash water in such a fashion that
all the portions of the bed may perform nearly the same amount of work and when washed, receive the same amount of cleaning.
Since the rate of wash is several times higher than the rate of filtration, the former is the governing factor in the hydraulic design of
filters, which are cleaned by back washing.
The most common type of under drain is a central manifold with laterals either perforated on the bottoms having umbrella type
strainers on the top. Other types such as wheeler bottom a false bottom with strainers spaced for the entire area at regular intervals or
a porous plate floor supported on concrete pillars are all satisfactory when properly designed and constructed. Porous plates,
however, are likely to be clogged by minute quantities of alumina, which can penetrate through the filter bed. which might lead to
rupture.
In the case of central manifold with lateral system, the manifolds headers and laterals are of cast iron, plastic, asbestos cement,
concrete or other material. The velocity of jets issuing from perforations or orifices is destroyed by directing the openings downward
against the filter bottom and in the coarse gravel rounding the pipes .the lost head therefore will be equal to the driving head during
the wash. In practice this controlling head loss is set between 1 to 4.5 m. A non ferrous under drain system is preferable where the
water has low pH and the water is corrosive and when the correction of pH has to follow the filtration process. However A.C. pipes
have a tendency to dissolve away In the presence of low pH alum treated waters.
The following figures may be used in the design of an under drain system consisting of central manifold and laterals.
1.
The perforations vary from 5 to 12 mm in diameter and should be staggered at slight angle the vertical axis of the pipe.
2.
Spacing of the perforations along the laterals may vary from 80 mm for perforations of 5 mm to 200mm for perforations of 12
mm.
3.
Ratio of total area of perforations in the under drain system to total cross sectional area of the lateral should not exceed 0.5 for
Ratio of total area of perforations to the entire filter area may be 0.3 %.
5.
The ratio of the length to the diameter of the lateral should not exceed 60.
6.
7.
The cross sectional area of the manifold should be preferably 1.5 to 2 times the total area of the laterals to minimize the
frictional losses and to give the best distribution. It is useful to check the design for uniformity of distribution of wash water in
laterals of the under drains.
The central manifold with lateral type of under drainage system is shown in the fig.
The under drain system should therefore be designed in such a way that in addition to collecting the filtered water during its
downward journey, it should be capable of passing the wash water upwards at a high rate of 300 to 900 litres/minute/m 2 of the filter
area, or more, depending on the design, while applying it evenly and uniformly over the under portion of the gravel or sand bed.
The various types of under systems are:
1. Manifold and lateral system
2. The wheeler bottom
3. The porous plate bottom
Materials for wash water gutters include concrete, asbestos cement, plastic, cast iron and steel. While the horizontal travel of dirty
water over the surface of the filter is kept between 0.6 to 1.0 m. before reaching the gutter, there are successful units with troughs
20
eliminated and having only main gutters where the dirty water travel has been as high as 3m. It is uneconomical to place wash water
gutters against the sidewalls of the filter. The upper edge of wash water gutters should be placed efficiently near to the surface of the
sand so that a large quantity of dirty water is not left in the filter after the completion of washing. At the same time, the top of the
wash water gutter should be placed sufficiently high above the surface of the sand so that sand will not be washed into the gutter. The
edge of the trough should be slightly above the highest elevation of the sand as expanded in washing. Where this height cannot be
determined by test a convenient rule is to place the edge of the gutter as far above the undisturbed sand surface as the wash water
rises in one minute. Air and water should not be applied simultaneously with such gutter height. The gutter should be large enough to
carry all the water delivered to it with at least 50 mm between the surface of the water flowing in the gutter and the upper edge of the
gutter. Any submergence of the gutter will reduce the efficiency of the wash. The gutter may be made with the same cross section
through out its length or it might be constructed with varying cross section increasing in size toward the outlet end. The bottom of the
gutter should clear the top of the expanded sand by 50 mm or more.
Figure 4
21
2.
The filtrate should be free from colour (3 or less on the cobalt scale).
3.
When the raw water turbidity does not exceed 30 NTU, the filters runs should normally be not less than 6 to 8 weeks, with the
For rapid sand filters the performance standards may be based on the following criteria:
1.
2.
The filtrate should be free from colour (with 3 or less on the cobalt scale)
3.
The filter runs should normally be not less than 24 hours with a loss of head not exceeding 2m.
4.
For an efficient filter, the wash water consumption should not exceed 2 percent or the quantity filtered in between washing.
22
23
Superchlorination provides a chlorine residual of 3.0-5.0 mg/l, 10 times the recommended minimum breakpoint chlorine
concentration. Retention time for superchlorination is approximately 5 minutes. Activated carbon filtration removes the high chlorine
residual.
5.2.4 Shock chlorination is recommended whenever a well is new, repaired, or found to be contaminated. This treatment introduces
high levels of chlorine to the water. Unlike superchlorination, shock chlorination is a "one time only occurrence, and chlorine is
depleted as water flows through the system; activated carbon treatment is not required. If bacteriological problems persist following
shock chlorination, the system should be evaluated.
5.3 CHLORINATION GUIDELINES
Chlorine solutions lose strength while standing or when exposed to air or sunlight. Make fresh solutions frequently to maintain
necessary residual.
Maintain a free chlorine residual of 0.3-0.5 mg/l after a 10 minute contact time. Measure the residual frequently.
Once the chlorine dosage is increased to meet greater demand, do not decrease it.
Locate and eliminate the source of contamination to avoid continuous chlorination. If a water source is available that does not require
disinfection, use it.
Keep records of pertinent information concerning the chlorination system.
Types of chlorine used in disinfection
Public water systems use chlorine in the gaseous form, which is considered too dangerous and expensive for home use. Private
systems use liquid chlorine (sodium hypochlorite) or dry chlorine (calcium hypochlorite). To avoid hardness deposits on equipment,
manufacturers recommend using soft, distilled, or dematerialized water when making up chlorine solutions.
Liquid Chlorine
Dry Chlorine
24
25
By the addition of a weak solution prepared from bleaching powder, HTH, etc. For
made by dissolving gaseous chlorine in a small auxiliary flow of water, the chlorine being
obtained from cylinders containing gas under pressure.
26
= 8 MLD
= 80,00,000 l/day
= 0.0926m3/s
-- 1
Q= V
-2
--
From 1 & 2,
A= 0.58 m2
Considering a Rectangular Open Channel, with the following ratio = 1.5 and S=
A= D x B, & B=1.5D
This implies, B= 0.9 m,
D = 0.6 m, Considering a free board of 300mm, D = 0.9m
Figure 5
27
= 0.56 m2
= 1.3 m
Breadth of screen
= 1.3 m
A minimum free-board of 300 mm shall be provided; this may be suitably raised where required
by turbulent conditions in the channel.
Figure 6
28
3.1 PUMP
Q= 8MLD,
Pumped would work for 8 hours in a day
Velocity
= 2.5m/s
Length
= 1000 m
Qpump
= 0.278m3/s
3.1.2 DESIGN
A= Q/A
= 0.1112 m2
= 0.1112
D
HL
= 0.376m = 40 cm
= 23.86m
Total head, H = 12 + 23.86 = 35.86 m
(80 % efficiency)
=162.16 HP
29
30
= 1.33 1000 m3
5. DESIGN OF FLOCCULATOR
5.1 MIXING BASIN
Q = 8MLD
= 0.092m3/s
DT = 30 min
Volume of water treated in 30 min = 81061 =
0.6 103 m3
242
Velocity of flow though channels as 0.3 m/s
Length of flow
(0.15 -0.45m/s)
= velocity DT
= 0.3 (3060)
=540m
=
=
= 2.46 m
The clear opening between the end of each baffle and the wall may be taken as equal to
1.5 times the distance between the baffles
= 1.5 0.45
= 0.7m
The effective length of each channel may now be taken as the average distance travelled
by this water in the channel
Effective flow length of each channel
= clear width of either half of the tank -2.5 the opening
31
= 6 (2.50.7) = 5.3m
The tank is divided into 2 compartments with longitudinal partition walls and each half
have clear width of 6 m
No. Of channels required
=
= 102
=1000l/hr/m2
= 1000
32
(1000-1250l/hr/m2)
Adopt , the water depth as4 m and get the plan area
Area =
= 600m2
= 40 m
Hence, use tank 40m154m. Provide extra depth for sludge storage say use 4.5 m depth
at the starting end 4.5 +(45/50)= 5.4m at the d/s end (use 1 in 50 slope )
Use a freeboard of 0.5 m above the water level
5.3 FLOC CHAMBER
In addition to 40 m length floc chamber also needs to be provided
Depth of floc chamber is taken half of the depth of tank
Depth = 4.5/2=2.25m
Detention time =20 min
Capacity of chamber =flow required in 20min
= 200m3
Plan area required
=
=89m2
33
MLDm3/s
= 8.33 MLD
MLD
= 0.354
106L
= 354 m3/hr
Rate of flitration
= 5 m3/m2/hr
Plan area
=
= 70.8 m2 ~ 75 m2
=
=37.5 m2
5m
34
Area of laterals=
=2
area of perforation
= 2* 0.075 = 0.15 m2
Number of laterals on one side of manifold
= 7.5
100/15 = 50
=2
50= 100
Area of manifold
=2
area of laterals
= 2 0.15= 0.3 m2
d2 = 0.3
Diameter of Manifold
= 0.62m ~ 65cm
= 0.075 m2
total perforations
= 750
=8
=7.5 ~ 8
(1.3)2 cm2
= 10.6 cm2
Area of laterals
=2
35
area of perforation
=2
Dia of each lateral
10.6 ~ 22cm2
=
= 5.3 cm
Hence, use 100 laterals each of 6.0 cm dia @ 15 cm c/c, each having 11 perforations of 13
mm size with 65 mm dia manifold.
Figure 7
Figure 8
36
7.1.1 CONSIDERATIONS
Rate of washing the filter = 60cm/min
To calculate depth, the following emperical formula is used
Q=1.367by3/2
7.1.2 DESIGN
Wash water discharge ,
q
= 0.6
5 7.5/60
= 0.375 m3/sec
Vlateral = Q/A = 1.3m/s which is < 2.4m/s
To calculate depth,
Q=1.367by3/2, Taking B=y
y = 0.38m ~ 40cm
37
= 24 kg
=80 kg
= 0.166 ML
= 3a
38
Period in hours
Cumulative
Pumping
04-05
05-06
06-10
10-12
13-14
14-17
17-18
18-20
20-21
21-22
22-23
23-01
01-04
0.4a
0.8a
2.25a
A
2.25a
0.7a
2.25a
0.9a
0.7a
0.7a
0.4a
0.2a
0.2a
1.5a
3a
9a
12a
13.5a
18a
19.5a
22.5a
24a
24a
24a
24a
24a
0.4a
1.2a
10.2a
12.2a
15.05a
17.15a
19.4a
21.2a
21.9a
22.6a
23a
23.4a
24a
39
Cumulative
deficit or
surplus
1.1a
1.8a
-1.2a
-.08a
-1.55a
0.85a
-0.1a
1.3a
2.1a
1.4a
1a
0.6a
0
REFERENCE
40