STAN J. CATERBONE and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP LITIGATION VALUATION SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS As of December 27, 2016

U.S. District Court 16-4014 CATERBONE v. United States, et.al.
G
j($
-Capital Raised
54 million
100 million
*tal
2.7 million
5.0 million
.5 million
million
1.0 million
- 5 million
3 . o million
6.0 million
4. o million
camnksions
lbmiqs
-Affiliate
-mtal
GKSS
- m a e
Revenue
less Orsmnissions
.3
.76 million
1.52 million
'
llion
N/A
SALES FORCE
-=w-'=
37 P==ns
50 Persons
48 plSotl.5
--Hires
10 persons
14 persons
14 persons
-Retention
90%
85%
95%
m N C I A L S (All MlPRberS
in Millions of Dollars)
Revenue
.76
1.8
N/A
--Retained Profits
.21
-501
N/A
--Return On FqUity
70%
66.6 %
N/A
--Capital Base
.300
-785
N/A
-Book Value Begin/Year
.300
.725
.30O-
--Book V d l u e / S h a r e
1.60
3.05
4.00
-~ook value w/Year
-480
1.526
N/A
-Value EQr Share

(at 3.5 x fsook)
$5.60
$10.67
$14.00
$10.00
$13.33
$17.00
-Net
Traditional
-
(at 1
*.sham?
>;
Total Grms R e J e r f ~ e )
Stan J. Caterbone's 50,000 shares Value =

Stan J. Caterbone Litigation Valuation
$500,000
-15-
Page 1 of 523
$666,500
$850,000
Tuesday December 27, 2016
U.S. District Court 16-4014 CATERBONE v. United States, et.al.,
US District Court For The Eastern District of Pennsylvana
+.
,,,, .I
./
1755 Oregon .
Conestoga Man Linked to Theft
.. .
I
i,
Manheim Township police ar!
i rested a Conestoga man Thursday
i , n$ht on charges that he erased
.'.
1 ormation from a township company's computers, stole files and
. I damaged equipment.
Stanley J. Caterbone, 29, of
2323 New Danvilie Pilte. . was
I
, charged with btsrglary, thetl, un,f l a d u l restraint, robbery, unlawuse of a computer, criminal
I..., . . ful
mischief and terroristic threats.
' ~ e t e c t i v eLarry ~ a k i said
s
- w e . victim, Financial ManageI'
Section 3189 Federal Fal
meht Group Ltd.,

Pike, lost an estimated
$60 Wo-as
.I
1.
I
i'
,'
EX-~orkei,Charg&d
In Bvrglgry
.
at Firm
,
The suspect also was served a i

warrant, for terroristic threats in
a case snvolving another female ;
employee of the firm. Caterbone,
a former employee of the coppa- . '
ny, was committed to prison,in
lieu of f20,W bail.
crimes.
He also was servgl a warrant'
for terroristic threats tn a case Invoivin another female employee ,
ofthe-firm. .
.
CAterbone, a former 'employ. /
ee of the coppany, was commit- ,
ted to prLson 1n l ~ e u
of $20,OW bar\.. :I
:.
'A:
Property of Advance Media Group
Page 2456 of 2953
Page 2 of 523
LANCASTER NEWSPAPERS SEPTEMBER 4, 1987

ALL CHARGES WERE DISMISSED
What they failed to state:

1. I was a co-founder, and more founder than any partner.
2. I was on the Board of Directors.
3. I was Executive Vice President of FMG, Ltd., and PRESIDENT of FMG Advisory,
Ltd., not an employee, only technically because I also received a salary in addition
to my fees and commissions from my planning practice.
4. They never did a follow-up story when ALL charges were dismissed.
5. The real damage was only $1,300; I paid this to the Lancaster District Attorney's
Office and Joe Madenspacher wrote a check out to Robert Kauffman.
6. I actually had designed some and managed and supervised all of the technology
that I dismantled on the night in question.
Ex-Worker Charged In Burglary At Firm

A 29-year-old Conestoga man was arrested Thursday night on charges that he erased
information from a Manheim Township companys computers, stole files and damaged
equipment.
Stanley J. Caterbone, 29, of 2323 New Danville Pike, was charged with burglary, theft,
unlawful restraint, robbery, unlawful use of a computer, criminal mischief and terroristic threats.
Detective Larry Mathias said the victim, Financial Management Group, Ltd., 1755 Oregon
Pike; lost an estimated $60,000 as a result of Caterbones actions.
Caterbone allegedly forced a cleaning person, Stacy L. Waters, 19, of Lititz, to
accompany him through the business during the crimes.
He also was served a warrant for terroristic threats in a case involving another female
employee of the firm.
Caterbone, a former employee of the company, was committed to prison in lieu of
$20,000 bail.
Conestoga Man linked to Theft

Manheim Township police arrested a Conestoga man Thursday night on charges
that he erased information from a township companys computers, stole files and damaged
equipment.
Stanley J. Caterbone, 29, of 2323 New Danville Pike, was charged with burglary, theft, unlawful
restraint, robbery, unlawful use of a computer, criminal mischief and terroristic threats.
Detective Larry Mathias said the victim, Financial Management Group, Ltd., 1755 Oregon
Pike; lost an estimated $60,000 as a result of Caterbones actions. Caterbone allegedly forced a
cleaning person, Stacy L. Waters, 19, of Lititz, to accompany him through the business during the
crimes.
Page 3 of 523
The suspect also was served a warrant for terroristic threats in a case involving another
female employee of the firm. Caterbone, a former employee of the company, was committed to
prison in lieu of $20,000 bail.
Page 4 of 523
Page 5 of 523
Page 6 of 523
Lancaster Online
1 of 2
http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_action=doc&p_docid...
Printer Friendly Version
FMG head resigns; team takes reins

Sunday News (Lancaster, PA)
Publication Date: June 10, 1990
Tag: 124F60DE18BE0F88
Section: BUSINESS
Page: D01
By Doug Thomas
Citing "irreconcilable philosophical differences," Robert Kauffman and the board of Financial Management Group (FMG) have decided to part company.
Kauffman suddenly resigned as FMG president last month after becoming increasingly frustrated with what he said was the board's failure to follow his
lead in policy matters affecting the company's future. The board, in turn, says Kauffman had grown secretive, steadfastly refused to share power and had
begun to stray too far from the company's original business plan.
Employees say the truth probably lies somewhere in the middle and liken the split to a marriage between good people who could no longer live together.
Kauffman is the last of the Lancaster investment advisory firm's three founders to quit. Stan Caterbone and Mike Hartlett, who along with Kauffman
formed FMG four years ago, are also no longer with the company. Kauffman and Hartlett still each own more than 20 percent of FMG.
Kauffman's departure raises some questions about FMG's future. Kauffman, 36, is expected to start another financial services firm and, reportedly, as
many as six FMG employees are likely to follow him. Kauffman was known for his entrepreneurship, and colleagues say one of his best qualities was his
ability to generate new ideas.
Kauffman says FMG's board members were after money, power and prestige, and that they sought control of the firm he had helped to make a success.
He calls the events leading up to his resignation "saddening."
"All of these people, eight, nine, 10 years ago, I brought into the business," Kauffman said, "They were nobodies. I taught them how to make money, I
resurrected their personal lives, I told them they could be something. I helped them become managers and eventually they stabbed me in the back. It's a
human tragedy of sorts."
Kauffman says that, besides holding all of the management titles, he was FMG's top producer. He has more than 200 clients. Kauffman says the board
seemed to resent the fact that he took a salary on top of his commissions.
The company's new management team includes Alan Loss, chairman of the board and chief executive officer, Pete Poneros, executive vice president,
Harry Radcliffe, president, and Dan Moyer, secretary-treasurer.
The four men deny they ousted Kauffman just so they could run the firm, and say they wished Kauffman's departure could have been more amicable.
"Nobody's gloating about this," Loss says, "and nobody wants to be vindictive."
They say they will, for the time being, run the firm by committee. "At some point, once everything is finalized and we know just what the cash flow is and
the profitability, we may hire a non-producing person to run the company," said Loss, "but right at this point we have determined that we don't want any
one person to have that kind of power."
Radcliffe said the board is concerned that the public will get the impression that FMG's internal corporate problems may spill over into its day-to-day
business.
"This does deeply concern me," he said, "from the standpoint that people could be overly disturbed by something that's not a problem."
The changes have cost the firm money, the board concedes, but so far have not had a negative effect on clients.
As for Kauffman, he says FMG will no doubt succeed.
"While I think that building a sales organization from scratch to the point at which FMG is, is a unique talent," he says, "it's not such a unique talent to take
it from where it is now and go on. And I suspect that while maybe only a few people could get it where it is, there are many who could take it from here."
Whatever he does from now on, Kauffman says his view of investing has not and will not change.
"Quality investments are bought for the long term," Kauffman says. "I talk with people 60 years old and they never tell me they made their money buying
and selling stocks or doing options or using margin accounts or buying penny stocks or buying junk bonds. Nobody ever tells me that. You buy quality and
you hold it."
Kauffman says he has also not waivered in his view of what the financial business should look like.
Page 7 of 523

10/10/2015 3:46 PM
Lancaster Online
2 of 2
http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_action=doc&p_docid...

Kauffman, who worked for many years at what is now American Express' IDS subsidiary _ along with the two other FMG founders _ opened FMG as a
full-service, umbrella financial services company offering planning, stocks, bonds, CDs, accounting and legal services all under one roof. FMG also made
a name for itself marketing real estate syndications.
He still believes that's the future.
Content may not be republished without permission.

Copyright 2015, LancasterOnline, Lancaster, PA. [Terms of Use | Privacy Policy]
Page 8 of 523

10/10/2015 3:46 PM
Section 3189 Federal False Claim Act

U.S. District Court 16-4014 CATERBONE
v. United States, et.al.,
Page 9 of 523
Page 2671 of 2953
Tuesday December 27,

2016
10/19/2006
Name
$0.50
$5.00
Bavera. J e r r y
Braverman, Richard
Caterbone, Stanley
Clark, Glenn
Coho, T h e b e 8 .
H a r t l e t t , Michael
Kauffman, Robert
Kennedy. David
Long. Robert
Loss, Alan
Loss. Nathan
Ncnell, Linda
Oischger, Donald E.
Paneros, Pete
Podlasek, Richard
Radcliffe. Harry
Ray, Kenneth
Robertson, Scott D.
Roesser, Steve
Royer, Carolyn D
Trump, Richard C.
Trump, Richard L.
Umiker , Nora A.
Volpe. Gary
Volpe, Richard J .
40000
40000
60000
'
Total Shares
Total Capital
Raised
Total
Shares
140000
65000
35000
$70.000~$162,500 $122.500
Offering Memorandum
45000
Page 10 of 523
35000
5500
245500
$27,500 $382,500
40000
W*W,II
YIUS,*I*I
n Park II. 1 1 5 9 O r w o n PI*.

L a n c a e r , PA 1Ywr
1694100 1 0 0 - S l $ J S L 7
U 1 D i n - i I 2 4 [PA o n w
ROBERT E. KAUFFMAN
PRESIDENT
Mr. stanley C a
554 BerEley mad
New Jersey 08247
Stone
Dear Mr. CaWe,
the Board of D i r e s t o m , are in ramipt of y~

rn back to the oorpcaation.
note offer-
to sell shares or
A l l u i me to first address the easy points of your pro-1:

1. William Um&x does mt, at this
never cuqmw~teany
-,
desire to cash out h i s
2.
We w i l l
3.
W w i l l not give you one share of Trl: stmk for nostalgic

reasons as we dd rat want any dissident stcckholders in our
Alture. Flhen we buy s M c , it will be the entire ammt.
4.
W
y
, you feel strongly abart yrur debt to Bill Johnson
a d want it to be paid. So do we. You also have several
other d t o r s who we wculd like to see paid. To be sure
that they are paFd, we will dsdud their paynent f m m any
pmcsds.
A t t a w you will f i r d a l i s t t h a t w e n a ~ h o u
ex-staff psaple for any reason.
abart.
As for the price of the &xk, we are willing to pay $2.50 per
share for 40,000 shares and $5.00 per share for ycur 400 shares or
$102,000 less debts* lhat is what we are w i l l *
to pay this W!
rn the future,
will mibe the price by:
1.
2he build up of any debt, costs, interests and penalties
2.
'me continued defmtion of our corporate nan!e will reduce
its value
3.
Dur time
penaingbjnlauptcy
ask in c l e a l i q with either -pr
Page 11 of 523
your
Please Sr aa~ised.+
&
t
tm this p i n t we have tried to urderstand
cirumstances, W i v e s an3 corditions to your actions.
In Lne
flhrce, we w i l l not be unjersming.
We
enkezzlemnt
prepsred to purstw aimiral

for attempted
have che~=& to prwc it), bLPglJTY.
,theft '
(we
~ d'~&Yye
~ i t -xi*
a J q g ~ ~ x 1 s oterm,
n
E!e aadviSea that Ure
sli&test p r v v ~ ~ i l t i oof
n m l r m q n r a t l n n will result in tho filinj of
the &bVe mfs,
'&e filiny o f Chargffi ha^ rmthirq tn dn with this
negotiation.
It has to do with amtinued kritten ard v-1
assault lfeon cur ffm.
w a n t l y ,
any a l e of sta2k will also n q u k e an agreanent

a covenant kMch settles any
all
not to dcfcur firm and

claims aguinst the corporation.
stan, our skirrurte is that t d y you would raceive ahout $55,000

for ycur s M c m a11 cmlitors are paid. Y w , or course, have the
option to hold your stock hlefinitely, offer it to us at a later
time or
R 131t~m
repmsentative offer it ta us. It is up to
ym. You have ax best offer.
Board of DinXtom
FinaMial ~~t
Page 12 of 523
aL-cup,
m.

Page 13 of 523
Page
1 2953
of 46
Page No.
2116 of

10/19/2006

Page 14 of 523
Page
2 2953
of 46
Page No.
2117 of

10/19/2006

Page 15 of 523
Page
3 2953
of 46
Page No.
2118 of

10/19/2006

Page 16 of 523
Page
4 2953
of 46
Page No.
2119 of

10/19/2006

Page 17 of 523
Page
5 2953
of 46
Page No.
2120 of

10/19/2006

Page 18 of 523
Page
6 2953
of 46
Page No.
2121 of

10/19/2006

Page 19 of 523
Page
7 2953
of 46
Page No.
2122 of

10/19/2006

Page 20 of 523
Page
8 2953
of 46
Page No.
2123 of

10/19/2006

Page 21 of 523
Page
9 2953
of 46
Page No.
2124 of

10/19/2006

Page 22 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
212510
of 2953

10/19/2006

Page 23 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
212611
of 2953

10/19/2006

Page 24 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
212712
of 2953

10/19/2006

Page 25 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
212813
of 2953

10/19/2006

Page 26 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
212914
of 2953

10/19/2006

Page 27 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
213015
of 2953

10/19/2006

Page 28 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
213116
of 2953

10/19/2006

Page 29 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
213217
of 2953

10/19/2006

Page 30 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
213318
of 2953

10/19/2006

Page 31 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
213419
of 2953

10/19/2006

Page 32 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
213520
of 2953

10/19/2006

Page 33 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
213621
of 2953

10/19/2006

Page 34 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
213722
of 2953

10/19/2006

Page 35 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
213823
of 2953

10/19/2006

Page 36 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
213924
of 2953

10/19/2006

Page 37 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
214025
of 2953

10/19/2006

Page 38 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
214126
of 2953

10/19/2006

Page 39 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
214227
of 2953

10/19/2006

Page 40 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
214328
of 2953

10/19/2006

Page 41 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
214429
of 2953

10/19/2006

Page 42 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
214530
of 2953

10/19/2006
Page 2146 of 2953
Page 43 of 523
Page No. 31 of 46
10/19/2006

Page 44 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
214732
of 2953

10/19/2006

Page 45 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
214833
of 2953

10/19/2006

Page 46 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
214934
of 2953

10/19/2006

Page 47 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
215035
of 2953

10/19/2006

Page 48 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
215136
of 2953

10/19/2006

Page 49 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
215237
of 2953

10/19/2006

Page 50 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
215338
of 2953

10/19/2006

Page 51 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
215439
of 2953

10/19/2006

Page 52 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
215540
of 2953

10/19/2006

Page 53 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
215641
of 2953

10/19/2006

Page 54 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
215742
of 2953

10/19/2006

Page 55 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
215843
of 2953

10/19/2006

Page 56 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
215944
of 2953

10/19/2006

Page 57 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
216045
of 2953

10/19/2006

Page 58 of 523
Page
of 46
PageNo.
216146
of 2953

10/19/2006
Carol Andrews
Nancy Arment
P67
Thomas P. Asselin
(Planner)
LLA Robert Bakeman
(Planner)
M75
Jerry Bavero
(Manager)
66T Richard Braverman
(Planner)
XXZ Daniel Brown
(Planner)
Shelly Burkholder
M37
RRJ
Stanley Caterbone
(Planner)
Rodger Cornelius
(Planner)
28C Timothy Cummerford

(Planner)
228 N. Reservoir St. .

Lancaster, PA 17602
(717) 394-2327 - H
R#6, New Danville Pike

Lancaster, PA 17603
(717) 872-9355 - H
1030 Oakwood Drive

Dunedin, FL 33528
(813) 736-6905 - 0
701 Market Street

Lewisburg, PA 17837
(717) 523-3228 - 0
J. B. Financial Services
21 South 4th Street
Lewisburg, PA 17837
(717) 523-3228 - 0
125 Colonia Crest Drive

Lancaster, PA 17601
(717) 299-0175 - H
Assoc. Financial Planning

401 E. Lancaster Avenue
Shillington, PA 19607
(215) 775-9900
515 Crestview Avenue

New Holland, PA 17557
(717) 354-5083 - H
2323 New Danville Pike

Conestoga, PA 17543
(717) 872-9081 - H
221 Lincoln Way East

Chambersburg, PA 17201
(717) 267-1426 - 0
(717) 485-4814 - H
322 North 2nd Street

McConnellsburg, PA 17233
7241 Ohms Lane, Suite 270
Edina, MN 55435
(612)" 835-7715
2733 Lititz Pike

Lancaster, PA 17601
(717) 569-1875 - H
320 Royal Road

Lebanon, PA 17042
(717) 274-8569 - H
Peggy DeMarco
66M
Todd Dellinger
(Planner)
Fred Fischer
(Fee-only
Post Office Box 418

Planner Mechanicsburg, PA
17055
(717) 780-4965 - 0
2034 Main Street, Apt. 4

Rothsville, PA 17543
(717) 627-3376 - H
(717) 766-0914 - H
Bonnie Goodman
Page 59 of 523
CCA
Michael Hartlett
2866 0'Henry Circle
(Planner) Lancaster, PA 17601
(717) 898-8940 - H
Harold Hoover
(Corp. Svcs)
54 N. Cedar St., Apt. 3
Lititz, PA 17543
Lisa
XX4
Robert Kauffman
1306 Beaconfield Drive
(Management)
Lancaster, PA 17601
QQA
David Kennedy
3900 Skippack Courtyard

(Planner) P.O. Box 910, Suite 3
Skippack, PA 19474
164 Bechtel Road
Collegeville, PA 19426
YYR
P. Alan Loss
1731 Glenbrook Avenue

26W
Jeanne McCanna
American Asset Management
(Planner) 1730 Plymouth Road
Suite 204 Minnetonka,
MM 55343
27A
Peter McClellan
American Asset Management
. (Planner) 1730 Plymouth Road
Suite 204 Minnetonka,
MM 55343
Page 60 of 523
Hank
Kline
Lynn
Kreid
er
Peter
Labell
a
Bruce
Larki
Rober
Long
ont Street Suite 102

Harrisburg, PA 17110
(Sports
Promotion)
423 West Orange Street

46 (Accountant)
6
Lancaster, PA 17603
Sc
ot
la
nd
Ro
ad
Qu
ar
ry
vi
ll
e,
PA
17
56
6
23
11
No
rt
h
Fr
on
t
St
re
et
Su
it
e
10
2
Ha
rr
is
bu
rg
,
PA
17
11
0
(717) 627-3238 - H
(717) 293-9370 - H
(215) 584-5600 - 0
(215) 489-6065 - H
(717) 786-4443 - H
(717) 232-8850 - 0
(717) 232-8850 - 0
(717) 392-0839 - H
(717) 397-3825 - H
(612) 546-2002 - 0
(612) 546-2002 - 0
(612) 922-3874 - H
23
11
No
rt
h
Fr
Page 61 of 523
44G
Dennis Morgan
One Bacton Hill, North
(Planner) Suite 201
Frazer, PA 19355
(215) 640-1880
Thomas Mueller
1001 University Drive
(Planner) State College, PA 16801
(814) 237-5557
(814) 364-9410
Michael O'Brien Post Office Box 234

(Planner) Harrisburg, PA 17011
Greg Oleksa
0
H
(717) 691-1232
424 North
(717) 291-9244
Duke Street
(717) 393-0457
John Pennewell
26M
R2139 Swarr Run Road
Lancaster, PA 17601
Richard Podlasek
Assoc. Financial Planning
(Manager) 401 East Lancaster Avenue
Shillington, PA 19607
CC6
(215) 775-9900
(717) 898-7297 - H
Peter Poneros
3312 Cochran Drive
(Broker) Lancaster, PA 17601
(717) 569-2854 - H
John Pouliot
(717) 392-8881 - H
(717) 397-8062- 0
610 Apple Road

(Insurance)Lancaster, PA 17601
27B
Harry Radcliffe
880 Louise Avenue
(717) 285-7401 - H

Kenneth Ray
(Broker)
55E
Mona Rishel
88T
LLX
3615 Columbia Avenue

Lancaster, PA 17603
1630 Oregon Pike

(Fee-only Planner)
(717) 295-1384 - 0
(717) 872-5202 - H
(609) 654-4073
Lancaster, PA 17601
Stephen H. Roesler
28 Coates street
(717) 299-6519 - H
(Planner) Medford, NJ 08055

(215) 275-2391
27L
22A
SSK
Scott Robertson
2519 Chestnut Ridge Drive
(717) 949-2116 - H
Salamone Salvatore
615 Linda Lane
(Planner) Norristown, PA 19401
Henry W. Schmalzer
Box 586, Route #1
(Insurance)Newmanstown, PA 17073
Page 62 of 523
28Q
Richard Schuman
1755 Oregon Pike
(Sales Assistant)
Lancaster, PA 17601
(717) 569-3393 - 0
313
Barry Schuttler
5501 Twin Knolls Road
(Planner) Suite 101
Columbia, MD 21045
(301)
UUZ
Roy R. Sherbahn
639 Wyncroft Lane #2
(Insurance)
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717) 291-1290 - H
992-3446
(717) 393-1752 - 0
Larry Sherman 1915 Rockford Lancaster, PA 17601

SSD
Post Office Box 557

Richard Trump (Planner) Skippack, PA 19474
3841 Lywiski Road Collegeville, PA
19426
J96
27G
Thomas Tucker
221 Lincoln Way East
(Manager) Chambersburg, PA 17201
Gail Turner
7241 Ohms Lane, Suite 270

(Planner) Edina, MN 55435
(215) 489-2447 - 0
(215) 489-1989 - H
(717)
267-1426
(612) 835-7715 - 0
030
Thomas Turner
4500 Moorland Avenue
(Planner) Edina, MN 55424
(612) 922-7300 - 0
TTK
Richard Volpe
3900 Skippack Courtyard
(Manager) P.O. Box 910, Suite 3
Skippack PA 19474
(215) 584-5600 - 0
2447 Schlosser Road, Box 88

Cedars, PA 19423
Keith Waters
HHM
204 Queens Gate

(Planner) Lititz, PA 17543
204 Queens Gate
Lititz, PA 17543
Stacey Waters Andy
(215J 584-5628 - H
(717) 627-4015 - H
(717) 627-4015 - H
Wesler
(Case Writer)
23M
Kathy Ziegler
622 Wyncroft Lane #11
(Broker Assistant)
Lancaster, PA 17603
Page 63 of 523
(717) 293-9298 - H
1ST STOCKHOLDERS MEETING
< /
Welcome folks, to our first meeting. Does anybody mind if we record this? It tltesn't
matter whether I do or not; sometimes we record them, most of the time we erase them.
It doesn't much matter but that way we don't have a problem with what is said, what is
not said - after talking with our attorney, we have to get some disclaimers out here. I
have told most of the people here that if you are here, we have to assume you have
already bought stock. You are all currently stockholders.
We don't have checks, but we have settlement dates coming up and firm commitments to
buy. So, if you are in this room, you are bought. The reason we need to clarify that is
because if we are talking to potential investors instead of stockholders, there are certain
things we can't talk about because they would be an addition to the offering
memorandum, which we can't be making representative additions to that and be held
accountable for them. So, the first thing we are saying is we are all stockholders; this is
all between us; it needs to stay in this room. We really can't be giving inside information
to investors; if some of you are going to talk to other investors, it can't be things that we
have talked about as stockholders without all of us having some accountability in that.
So, this is just between us and this is really prepared to talk about anything under the sun
that you have an interest in. I would imagine if I just let you ask questions, we would
get around to most everything, or I could just ramble, but it would probably be better to
start with the things that are of most interest to you. Like I say, there is nothing that is
not fair gain that we are willing to talk about.
*
I would like to be a little more specific if I can because this is the first time I've met
most of the people here. Assuming we are all stockholders, in what percentages? Who's
what?
Well, in this room, Jerry, roughly all of these people have talked about 10,000 shares, the
same as you have. Nobody has talked about any more than that, except for Mike, Stan,
and myself.
We did want to talk ________________________________ . Oh, gee. We tried to use ____
I don't have ___________ . I have one. Well, Steve's going to want t
talk to me. I know that because you said something to me. Well, let me go get ______
We are not intending to raise so much money as we put in the offer. The reason that
Page 64 of 523
I
we added a whole bunch of shares at $5 was simply because, if we decide to raise some
more money in the future, we would have to go through the expense and aggravation of
doing another memorandum. So, we tacked on another 100,000-150,000 dollars of stock
available just for the sake of having it to sell in case we needed it and thinking it might
save us some money. So, we just went ahead and did the offering for 467 or something;
we could go up to 500,000 on that type of an offering without a problem. It didn't cost us
any more to do it for 367 than 225, so we just said let's add some shares on here.
Is there any indication so far of what the interest is out there? Well, I would say this at
250, there is interest beyond - what is available share. I mean I am convinced that at 350,
there is known interest for maybe half of what we've got available at 350. At $5 we have
some people, 1,000-2,000 shares - fives and tens from people's clients mostly. Stan has a
couple; I have a couple; Mike has a couple. It's my personal intention to buy some stock at
$5 when this is all said and done for my own account. So, I am saying that I don't think
there is known interest for more than 15-20 percent of what we have at $5, but we do have
people that are going to buy at $5. It is my belief that as soon as we are over having the
insiders get whatever interest they want that the market is going to be at $5.
It was my understanding also that there was going to be options available to preserve a
percentage interest. Am I correct on that? Well, the options as such, probably not. But,
everybody would have the option of buying additional shares when we go out for more
capital.
Do you have the right of fresh refusal? Yes, definitely - to maintain ____________ . The
official, what you would use when you do that, I believe is what is called a warrant. We
would give everybody a warrant to buy enough shares to preserve their ownership. It is
not our intention to dilute anybody, although the memorandum will have stuff all over it
about dilution. The way you get your interest diluted, of course, is that we decide at
some point in time that we need an extra $300,000 for whatever, and we decide we are
going to raise it in the form of equity. We go out to raise that and if we don't come forth
and buy whatever percentage we own of that new equity, there is going to be some
dilution. The good part of that is that if we raise 300,000, we ought to have more assets
if we buy anything hard with it, which raises the book value of the firm, which raises
what your stock is worth. So, you don't dilute your investment, but you do dilute
Page 65 of 523
your percentage when we go out with more. We may never do any more because,
frankly, nobody is more concerned about dilution than I am.
Just like you said, Jerry, 5% is what we had talked about originally - each one of us have
been diluted already. Well, we diluted ourself in the memorandum by adding the
additional shares just like everybody else. It's not as though one is getting and one is not.
The same percentage dilution.
I want this stated for record because, again, I want to know what is going on so I can
explain it to my investors. To give an example, I had talked to other people who have
already received your business plan. They said, Jerry, you are telling me about this figure
but your name is not mentioned anyplace. I said, well, it is in fine print on the
________________________ . My point is this, is everybody in the room currently contributing
capital? Is there anybody that is receiving shares that is not contributing capital. No,
everybody in the room is committed to paying for stock. By virtue of the fact that they are
sitting here, and I told them they couldn't sit here unless they are committed to buy stock.
Then, according to the business plan there is going to be no debt. Is that still holding
true? That's true right now. Jerry, there is only - I want everybody to understand that
we've had some talk about this. I am personally opposed to debt. I have a problem with it.
Do you mean in general or just to start the firm? I am generally opposed to being in
bondage to a bank or financial institution and having somebody telling me how to run
this business. Now, that does not mean that I am so inflexible on that issue that when we
need more capital that I won't consider debt right along with equity, that I won't consider
lease right along with everything else. It may be the only alternative. If we get out here
and we need a half million dollars for a computer system to do our own payroll or
something like that - I used that as an example before - and we have a choice of all
coughing up more money to keep our interest, or selling stock and diluting our interest to
the point where there is no control of the firm, or having some debt - it may be that debt
is the best alternative. If it is, that's where we are going to go. But I want to go as long
as we can without debt.
Why don't I just summarize what we are saying. Is there any changes in the business
Page 66 of 523
plan as we know it? None at all. One thing that is getting a lot of press and we ought
to talk about - a lot of discussion, is relationship with broker/dealer. I want to clarify
where we are on that for everybody's sake. At the current time, I am open to doing
whatever we need to do to be successful in this venture. If it means that we need to
look for a broker/dealer with a 95% payout to pay the bills tomorrow, I am open to doing
that. I am not going to be dragging my feet on being our own broker/dealer; I want to
get us registered; I want us to be able to do that at a moment's notice. What I want to do
is to activate the broker/dealer at the time when it is most advantageous for us, when
we are ready for it, when we are going to benefit by it. In the meantime, I think
relationship with FSC has some advantages - that I am going to be able to continue to
meet all the people in our area in the northeast; I am going to be able to get recruiting
leads in a 3-4 state area exclusively; I am going to be able to build out network within
FSC. And, I think there is some possibilities there that would be good for us, but if it is
not working it is not working. We are going to be, probably until the first of the year,
getting our broker/dealer ready and when it is ready and you are all ready, I am ready.
I have no ties with FSC that would delay anything that we need to do to get our business
where we want it.
Will you stay on there as a consultant? That is one thing that Steve wants to talk with
me about. So far, what has been said is that - John is saying to me that first of all he
does not want lose the Mutual of New York deal; he does not want executive turnover
while they are in the middle of a letter of agreement preceding the sale; he wants this to
look like a change of location as opposed to a resignation/termination, and because of
that he wants to have some kind of consulting agreement with me. He has told Steve to
find a common ground and work something out with me. We have talked about a couple
of different things but not in very much detail, and not to any conclusion - just trying
to bring it to some conclusion. He's asking me to stay mostly to help him open 3-4
offices like this one in a year. That is what he would like to do because that is what is
in the money proposal that says I'm going to do. I am saying to him that I probably
prefer either a regional or national recruiting type relationship where they will fly me
around; they will give me the leads; and they will pay for my solicitation calls; and let
me go meet financial planners around particularly the neighboring states. So I am
trying to focus this in a way that has some lasting long-term advantage for this group in
what I am doing. They are open to that; we have not decided - am I going to get 2,000
a head for every MFA, am I going to be on a salary - none of that has been decided. I
prefer that it be just like you all have a business of selling clients that
Page 67 of 523
maybe I have a side business of recruiting reps - the fact that you have your clientele helps
this business and hope my business in recruiting and getting to know reps will help this
business.
Are we all going to be actively engaged in doing that for our own accounts so to speak
__________________ the business here. In what way? Well, for example - I don't know if you
are talking about writing business with your clients of course. No, I am talking about
bringing reps into the_________________ . I certainly would hope so. I think that in some
point of time we would also recognize what things are good and healthy for the firm and
going to create revenue and equity, and all of that. I personally think that we have
different needs here in this building than we do overall, but we all have the same interest.
What I am saying there is, for me to hire 4 reps in Wilkes Barre - if they are good producers
and write clean business, that is not as much of a problem when we are with FSC as when
we have our own broker/dealer. You know broker/dealers get liable sometimes for what
people do in business. I am not as concerned about the character or reputation and product
mix of those people in Wilkes Barre as we will be about people right here in this building.
I think we can have 100 reps in the state in 12-18 months. I don't see a problem with that.
I think we can do that, particularly if we are all interested in doing that work, we can make
an awfully lot of money doing that. Perhaps more than we can make in this building. In
this building we do, you know, $5,000,000 worth of gross and until we are done paying our
expenses, we might make a couple of hundred thousand dollars. You go build a rep force of
100 people writing 10,000,000 and you have a 5% - just a 5% margin on them - you are
talking about a half of million dollars and you have 0 expenses, you made a half a million
dollars. What I am saying is, there is money in building the network out of here. Most of
us, all except Jerry right now, are conducting our business out of here. There is a lot of
advantages to us being able to conduct our business out of here, but as far as having an
awfully lot of equity potential to have your stock investment be worth a lot of money, a lot
of that is dependent on what we do outside of the city. We don't have to do it at a
breakneck pace; we don't have to get it all done tomorrow. It is nothing critical, but we
need to be working on that. If we know somebody in Philadelphia or Wilkes Barre, or
somebody with IDS or somebody with your old broker/dealer or - Jerry runs into people
everywhere - we need to be talking to them about our group. And, we need to have some
things that we have to sell, which probably brings me to the point as to what we have to sell.
Page 68 of 523
How do you see us structurally - the relationships with other reps outside of the office? In
other words, what percentage do you think we are going to get, just some rough idea?
Well, so far, most of the reps outside of this area that we have contact with are with FSC
now; we are kind of limited in what we can negotiate them to - what we get by virtue of
our volume. We might get extra 5 or 10, or 7.5 percent - you know, that's what we are
going to make. But when we get into other broker/dealers it is a little bit different. I
guess to see where the opportunity is, I would probably stop and look at what the market
place is right as far as broker/dealers. Of course, they are all under some price pressure,
mostly because partnership sales are down. Their big margin tickets are gone, so they are
all interested in finding ways to make money. They can either do that by lowering
payouts or - that seems to be a common answer __________________ well, there is one more and that is reducing services. Most companies
have decided to do, I would imagine, a combination of both. Therein, I think, lies most of
our opportunity. Particularly, when we can do something to improve their situation
______________________ . One thing that goes - the first thing that goes when a company
comes
under pressure, is marketing. You can't cut sales recruiting whatever, because that is
your only source of revenue; you can't cut operations or people will leave you if you
start fowling up too bad in business processing. So they cut what they can cut, which is
marketing, advice, planners support area. Is this happening with FSC? Sure, you just
slice it all up. You say, we are no longer going to do financial plans; we are no longer
going to give accounting advice; we are no longer going to give estate advice; we are no
longer going to respond to phone calls on partnership monitoring; - so you have this long
list of things we won't do. Well, therein lies a gap of things that we can do. I think that
being able to go out and get some volume, buy some things by our volume such as
seminars, such as financial planning software, such as getting the inhouse people, the
legal and accounting people, here on staff able to take a call from somebody inside
Pennsylvania and know the Pennsylvania laws, know what advice they can give in that
area, the mode of hookup or somebody with a - we can do financial plans here, for
instance. We can sell somebody IPS software, they can data input, or whatever - or, they
can send us all the data sheets. We have somebody here put the data in, do the
case, make the comment, and send it by _______________ over to their machine. We can do
some things in the servicing end to tie people in together. That's always been a missing
link with me. When Mike and I first started this thing with the Philadelphia people,
working on them, we immediately ran into a problem which was - what do they really
need us for? What can we really do for them? Because sooner or later they are going to
say - We may as well be the big man myself. I may as well have the freedom; I may
Page 69 of 523
as well have the high payout - so, there needs to be a tie. The two things that I see
immediately is computer network and professional network.
That's the key, as far as ___________ . From what I can gather, _ we all seem to have a
different area of expertise and that becomes very valuable to a rep out in the field who in
the one-shot instance runs across something - just like any business man, doesn't want to
give it up, will give up a piece to get the rest of it. And then, through that
____________________________ . Right, and I see the same thing with affiliates. I mean Jerry and
the cafeteria plan is a natural. How many businesses, good sized businesses, do people in
this room deal with? You know, it is a possibility that we can do that. Dick Sherbach is
excited about that possibility; he deals with a lot of large corporations. The more people
we bring in - then the challenge in management is, to gen up the process and getting
everybody to use everybody else. How do you keep everybody aware of who is the expert
on what, what they are doing, getting the splits worked out - make sure that it runs?
We've been spending a good bit of time thinking about that, talking about that - I talked
with Bob Long about that at length the other day, the CPA that we are
going to ____________________ . They are a lot easier than some of the others because they
go out and charge the client a fee for service - and it's $1,000 or $1500, or whatever, and
you say, well, the corp is going to get 30 - and you are going to split the rest or whatever.
That's no problem; for one thing they could markup the service a little bit to make sure
they are covered - that everybody gets covered. The problem is like with the property
casualty person, you send a homeowners over there and it is 100 bucks a year and the
commission is $15.00, and you're looking to divide that up 3 ways. I hope George
would be concerned about it; I am concerned about it. I know there is a way to do it; I
just haven't figured it out yet.
I assume his clients, probably a lot of them need financial planning. Of course, of
course, and that's the easy solution, but something that Bob Long said to me that struck
me as being true - Bob said, hey look, you know I am the only accountant in here. Am I
going to be passing more business out or taking more business in? Well, he expects to be
taking more business in. I expect the same thing is true with George Lovell. He cannot
pass out as nearly as much as he is going to get back. So, the reciprocal thing only works
to appoint with a low margin business. Bob thinks it will eventually involve this to the
point where everybody that is inhouse, is inhouse, and that we own all of the businesses
and we are all on a salary plus production-type arrangement or something like that, where
it is no longer an issue how we divide up the pie. We just go about
Page 70 of 523
making the pie. And, I think that is where we are going; I think that is 3+ years out
because we got to start where we are starting by putting everybody in the world on a
salary - unless you don't want to be in business very long.
I think I am pretty much done with that one but I will let you know that we are having
our first professionals in here, probably September 1. We are going to need to have it
resolved by then. We're open to any ideas you have, but right now I think our basic
problem is when the lower margin, lower ticket businesses. I don't think the real estate
people are going to be a problem with an equal split. If you send somebody who is
selling a house, I don't think the attorney or the accountant - I think there would be no
problem with an equal split there. And, they are just in seventh heaven, thinking about
an equal split on them sending us a client that has a million bucks and letting us work
with them. That is no problem with them at all. They can't touch that business right
now and they would love to be able to. So, we are in good shape there I think.
Do you say that the split will work up through? I think that we will just have a
standard procedure and we are going to say that there is probably going to be an equal
split - that if you refer somebody to an inhouse professional, you would get half of
whatever that person generates. If they send somebody to you, the same would hold
true. I want to say one other thing here, and the same thing with out-of-house people.
One thing that I do want to make clear - right now I am of the mind that I need to be
saying to the professionals that come in, that because they come in, just because they
take an office next door, doesn't guarantee them of anything. You can take business to
another accountant, you can do whatever you want to do as independents. It is going to
*
__
be there job to promote their businesses within our structure. They have got to get to
know you; they've got to get your trust; they've got to handle that business before they
get it done. That is their responsibility; it is not my responsibility to do that. And, if
they don't promote themselves through the network to the point where they are a
success, then we need to disengage and let somebody else do that. That, by the way, is
my feeling with all of you. You got to promote your businesses to them. We cannot
legislate who handles their clients anymore than we can legislate who handles ours.
There is only one big difference. There is only one of them, there is a lot of us. You
can get a guy - but I think you said a very important thing - the idea if you are in this
business as a career and for the long-term, you can be a GP, or you can start to provide
a specialty. If you want to be a GP for life, that is what you are going to be - a GP.
Page 71 of 523
But, if you want to be a specialist, now you have increased your value.
I would really prefer that everybody (I think most of us run our businesses this way), we
are GPs who have a specialty. I think we need to understand that is what we are; we
need to not lose sight of that; and we need to be better at our specialties. We are already
good at our GPs.
And, we have to know what our specialties are. That's true. I got an understanding of
what Jerry does and Rich, and these guys. We all have an understanding, but I really feel
the need that - you know we get out a sheet that says - or it could be an access to the
modem. We have certain people that says now I have a particular problem; I punch in
and this gives me a list of what we have. Now I know to call Alan, or whoever.
Carolyn was telling me one thing to prove that. In their computer network, they have
database, and its like that in-search. If you have a problem it will bring up that
department and give you a list of names who specialize in that department, it gives you
the names of inhouse people.
Plus I have always operated under the personal mode that if someone that I am in a
business relationship with comes to me, that's just a normal courtesy that I extend to
them. Call them on the phone, and say here it is, because I know that in some point in
time I may have a call and need the same service. I think that is one of the big
attributes of this whole network - concept.
For the ___________________________________ , particularly the PMC, and I have nothing aga
George Lovell, but would it have been simpler to have a PMC that works for the corp?
Well, that is what we are talking about, where we eventually think we will want to go
with all of the professionals. I don't think we are quite ready to do that. I think we are
helped a little bit by the fact that some of the professionals that are coming in with us
are old-line, Lancaster County established firms. We are a brand new firm, and that
credibility is going to help us - that some of these people have been willing to put their
name alongside of ours, but if the PC were in house I think he would still be asking the
same question eventually - which is, is it worth my while to send my clients over there,
for the money that I make and for the risk involved? We may very well figure out down
the road that P&C is not a business that we can be in. Let me give
Page 72 of 523
you an example of why. Prudential has lost their shirts, not just on the PC business,
but when somebody has an unsatisfactory auto claim, they jerk all the other business
too. We have to realize what the risk is in that.
Conversely, P&C guys are very covetous of their________________ . I made a specialty in
some respects of being the experts to the PC guys for things that they don't like, and
tensions,_____________________ and all the other good stuff. To get one of those guys to
open up, it is like trying to crack Fort Knox with a crowbar. It is really difficult
because they feel the same thing. If you fowl up on their end, there is a bad investment,
or the life insurance doesn't perform the way it is supposed to, or whatever, they are going
to suffer, depending on what kind of account it is, maybe thousands and thousands of
dollars of yearly renewal income. So that works both ways.
How does the Public Casualty companies look at that? ____________________ There is a lot
of service work involved there. Maybe we could ________________ they are not going to
get that much anyway, but it would be a lot of extra work that he has to
do, ___________________________________. Well, already, there is attempts - they are saying w
will give you 50% of the first share commission, but we have to have a bigger piece of the
renewal commission just for that reason. They are attempting to restructure the deal
before the ink is dry on them. Of course, we are not saying all the money is in the
renewals, that is part of my mentality. What we get on the first year basis is not going to
be that much ever and when they get to the point where they have $100,000 income on
the books here, they won't be all that interested in the next new client anyway. So, I
don't just accept that at face value. I don't know what the right deal is. I don't know if
I am right; I don't know if they are right; I don't know if they belong in here; I just don't
know.
One of the things that Jerry has done with PC people is he said, on a split commission
basis, I would like to call on all of your people that own a 1984-1985 Mercedes. It's not
like there can't be reciprocal business if we are able to work it so it is not an impossible
deal. I just want you to know that we are struggling a little bit with how to be fair to
those people. I don't want to go into relationships expecting to terminate it with George,
or anybody else. And, I don't know that we want to be in all these businesses inhouse.
I just flat out. It might be the greatest thing in the world for both of us and we might
never want to do anything else. But, in the meantime we need to think about - we need
to say, hey, he's coming in; we are going to try to support his
Page 73 of 523
business; we are going to try to get some referrals out of his business; and we need to
find a way to fair to him and us. So, if anybody has any ideas as to what ought to be
equitable, let's start out with what we think is equitable and let's prove it either works or
doesn't work. I don't have to, and you don't have to, feel that this corporation needs to
get its arms around everything and haul everything inside.
I think the emphasis should be to provide to the client the area that is going to have the
biggest impact. Previously, anything that has been going on, it has been tax planning,
investments, pensions, and the personal products that person can have. In working with
Property Casualty agents as an outset, over time the client depended more on me than he
did on them because they could get those things from anybody; they couldn't get things
that I was giving from anybody. So, the relationship gravitated away from them, more
toward me. So, we try to provide the services that are most important
to a business or an individual, such as financing, mortgages, tax________ , real estate,
investments, shelters, planning, insurance and sophisticated products.
P&P is very down the line as far ________________________________ . He is more like a client
the guy than he is a customer. In that business, it's more like a lost meter because it is
always a down and dirty cutthroat-type business as compared as to what we are going to
gravitate to, which I feel is going to be more to service.
I think there is at least a good chance that we picked the wrong business in our group of
affiliate. Not necessarily, but one thing is clear - we have to have a different
arrangement with them than the other professionals. The other ones fit like a glove -we
will be able to work those out.
Now that we are looking at that - if it becomes a problem down the road, the image, if
we would say we don't want that, isn't going to look good either. It doesn't matter. We
can always say, it is a business we offered, we do not have enough demand and get out of
it - just like in any other business, take the product off the shelf. I don't think it's
going to make us look bad - not really worth worrying about that much because it is nice
to be able to offer P&C to your clients as long as they are taken care of nicely, if they are
taken care of professionally. Anything that comes back to me, as far as P&C is extra.
Homeowners is not all that, but I would imagine somebody who does $700-5800 car
Page 74 of 523
insurance premium, there is some money in that. Yea, well that is 15% - see they usually
get the same renewal. That's the difference that we don't have in Life Insurance. We
start out with a 50-60-70 percent and then drop their value. That is 15 all the way
through, as long as it is the original writer of the business. If they take over an existing
business from an agent that goes out, they usually work on a reduced rate of 7-8% to
service the business. They bitch about it but they didn't have to do anything to get that
business; it is already on the books.
What's 30,000 or 40,000 a year in premium for us to do. It's nothing - or even
commissions. You're going to have to teach Jerry how to do his business too a little bit.
__________________ stuff that I am going to have to work with him on. We all can but ...
I don't want to spend a lot of time on this. This is a little thing, but I want you to know
that I am open to any recommendation, of somebody that is more experienced in this
business than I am, would have as to what to split, how to do, and I want to go about
helping George promote his business and there is money in it. There is money in it for
the corp, I know that. Because at the time he gets to making 100,000 out of his office
here, that's 30,000 a year revenue to us. It's as good as if you do 100,000 in gross
commission. We will get there in 2-3-4 years, but I am looking at how do I take care of
you, the referrers in this. That was my question.
The other thing is the corporate fire and casualty and all that. There has got to be a lot
of money in that end of it. We were just talking about the homeowners and car but
there's got to be bigger money in commercial accounts. Does this guy do this? He
worked on this with Willow Valley that's a couple hundred thousand a year _______ .
So, that's the guy where we could really - that's what we want.
It won't work. It's an educational process. We got to go through with it. George has
been a client of mine for quite a few years now and got good referrals - it's a two-way
street. He keeps thinking the same way you do - my property and casualty, my home
owner - the other ones, what can you do for them? It's going to be an educational
process and that's going to be part of our work with businesses, show what we can do.
We have to promote and he has to ________________ .
Just as a point of information, who are the attorneys that are coming in
here? _________________ _______________ are board approved and________________ ABA
American Bar Association in York, he wanted to go over the relationship with them.
Page 75 of 523
There are some legal things that have to be worked out. _____________________- The reason
we are not moving real quickly on ___________is because we don't have some of these
things worked out. Until these are worked out, I can't go back and say . We have
commitments from just about everybody to be in either September 1 or October 1 and we
have talked with them about what the corporation expects from them in terms of
commission, compensation, whatever. They do not have a problem with that and Bob Long,
of course, he has no problem with a very simple split policy, which is great.
I think the other thing, too, from a marketing standpoint we want them to get us in front of
the different bar associations, different accounting associations - that's where the real action
comes from - having those people free to call on us. I have always had the feeling that in
order to be successful with any of the other professional advisors, you really have to have
them as clients. If you merely knew them or took them to lunch, it really isn't going to pay
off. You have to get them as clients, so we might want to put a group together that
specializes in nothing but handling CPAs and attorneys in doing their business.
I am open for suggestions on that part of the marketing but the next step is to go back to the
CPAs that I've already met with that were part of the firm in discussing the relationship
between the firm and their client. But, I would agree with you that they should be a client
of ours and if we can put something together and say
_____________________________________________________________________________ . There is a firm out
College, known as Pennsylvania Financial - used to be ___________ Associates - they are
the largest provident mutual agency in the country. They have branches in different
parts of the country including ______ and New Orleans. I remember 5 years ago when
they were just in State College but they had a massive business on the books at State College.
You couldn't go anywhere that somebody didn't pull out a Provident Mutual. What they did is,
they took their internal people - they have an attorney on the staff
______________ , used to be with American College, has also written several books for trusts
and things like that; they just marketed the hell out of him. That was one of their
marketing thrusts - hey, we have a team, you are not working with an individual, we are a
team. In that team you have a qualified life agent, an, investment person, an attorney, an
account. If you accountant or attorney is not familiar with doing these things, we will
come in and do that in conjunction. A lot of times they did the documents, turned it over to
a local attorney, he bumped up the fee, and it was all done on split business. They are very,
very big in Texas now. They have their own inhouse pension
Page 76 of 523
administration. They are doing all the administration of 5500 and things like that. But,
it is not a bad way to go when you think about it. So it is a process of us marketing
and we have these professionals on staff, or inside, and what it can mean to the client.
Because now it sort of narrows that credibility gap. It is you talking to the CPA or
attorney, he's got one of his own talking to them. They talk the same language, etc. It's
a hell of a lot more powerful than just Joe marketer. That's what they view us as going in there doing that stuff.
While we are on this subject, I would like to say that is the thing that the BDs are
getting out of - that is the first thing to go - the attorneys, the accountants - all the
advice goes, and that's where the void is. If they were able to do it before we ought to
be able to do it now, in an even bigger way. The thing is to get the utilization of these
people in here. These people, I think, are going to be very open - conversation and the
kind of thing that 5 minutes, here's the advice and out. Well, we are pretty much done
with the affiliates, none of us (I have some but very little) practical knowledge of how
to integrate them and all of that but I have a little bit. But I think common sense and
some good judgement will get us through this.
The research people, would they be addressing us with our problems? Sure, they will do
all that you want to do because that is how they are going to promote their business.
That is not going to be a problem.
What else is critical that we need to discuss while we are together? Where do we
actually stand on the BB process? Well, right now we have forms that have been
completed, they have been sent to a securities consultant along with the U4s and
fingerprints of Stan, Mike and I. Everybody else would need to do that at the time we
are ready to activate but they had to have ours just to proceed from here. They are
proceeding with the filing. What they have told us is that PA District is backlogged; it
is a 4-5 month process right now, that they do the best that they can. The process
involves an approval of our paperwork, documents, all of that. It also includes the
principles of the firm having an interview with the NASD District Committee, which is
where the backup is. When they get a look at you guys, we're in trouble. I think we
have about 3 passing out right about there but that is where the backlog is - in the fact
that they have to do these personal interviews and you have to get on the docket. As
far as I know, there is not a whole lot going on other than waiting around for that.
When that happens, then they proceed with the rest of the filing. I think they have
Page 77 of 523
done everything they can do up to the point of getting us on the docket.

The last I talked we were going to structure our back office to what was going on with
them down in Orlando. Is that still the case? Our back office? The way he had to
establish his procedures internally and so on, his clear procedures and all that good stuff.
For those of us who do not know who Glen Refel, Glen was a top rep at FSC -did about a
million dollars in commissions and who knows what else he did in addition to that
himself. He left FSC to start his own broker/dealer about 6 months ago; Glenn is a fairly
close personal friend of mine. Glenn spent considerable time with me talking about this
concept that we have here. A lot of this is Glenn's concept that he is doing in Orlando.
He is going about things in a slightly manner but wanting to end of the same place.
Glenn wants to do things through marketing rather than sales. When I say sales, what
Stan and I have primarily done, and Mike has done too, is gone out and sold people on
the concept, get them in here, get them ready to write the business. What he wants to do
is go out and see the banks, see the insurance companies, develop the seminars, get the
leads, get the contracts to put people in the banks, and then go out and find the planners.
He is building his from the marketing side; we are building ours from the people side that's the difference. But we are going the same place. He wants the inhouse people and
the different businesses. He wants to go so far as - the reason he left FSC was that part
of his plan was that he wants to own a bank. There is no way you can do that without
your own BD. He gives more business to banks than anybody else. By the way, you
need $3,000,000 to buy a bank, so if any of you are worried about dilution, if we ever get
to that step we are going to borrow a truckload of money or we are going to get diluted.
Hopefully, a bank will buy us instead.
I want to finish what Jerry brought up real quick. Glenn, and most of the people who
write a lot of business, have set things up in such a way that one person processes the
business, one person follows it up to see that it is credited, paid, commissions paid; He
has a person making phone calls and getting people in for him, etc. We are talking about
an integrated-type of staff eventually but I really think that is something that we to
evolve to also.
My question had to deal with, in the memorandum there was a lot of discussion that
seemed to come back to - in any memorandum, there is always a lot of discussion about
the risks involved. We couldn't think of anymore. There was one mention of the fact
that there was no time commitment from the principals staying with the company; in
Page 78 of 523
otrfbr^vords, someone could get the feeling that well, if it doesn't work out in 8 months
somebody could walk out the door. That was a last minute addition by our attorney. He
asked us if we had an employment contract with each other; we said "no". He said then you
have got to put it in. Of course, what he said before that was that we want employment
contracts for everyone. We showed him the FSC thing and he said what good is this?
Anybody could get out of this with a day. We tried to explain that this is the way it is in our
industry. You can't say sign me for 5 years, Scott - that's nothing. So we worked through
with him trying to get him to understand that that is one of the risks of our business - that
tomorrow Rich Braverman might go with Penn Mutual Life to sell old people health
insurance or something. As far as we are concerned, I think my commitment has been
strong enough as far as moving, etc., but I am willing to sign an employment contract. I
have no problem with that.
That is one of the reason I asked if everyone in the room was making a capital
contribution. The reason is this - the people that I have approached as far as buying
stock as an investor has asked that same question of me. In other words, do the
principals have something to lose besides the time and effort? _______________
contribution, which any entrepreneur would lose in any business if they left it. We are on
the line for a half million dollars for this space here, so you know we have some ...
As I was looking at the memorandum, just so I am clarified, the price that the principals are
paying for the stock, is that about $.50 per share? Is that the way that works out? I saw the
par value was $.50. The average is closer to a dollar but some stock went at $.50. There
has also been a considerable amount of work over time; there was a time when we were
signing leases not knowing if it was filled, etc. But that is true.
Under the assets of the corporation - money market fund $60,000 - what is that other
asset? I can recall _________________ said we are going to consider you to be one of the
other investors. We are allowed up to 5 people; before the memorandum we did not have
5 because___________________________. We have essentially said some people have bought
10,000 shares and we don't have a check yet, just because we don't have a check yet. But we
know that it is a sale. The other reason that we have not said, by George, let us have a
check is because our attorney here again at the last minute, said, Well, gee, guys, don't issue
a stock certificate yet. You are legally not bound to and then we get to feeling like we ought
not take money unless we can deliver a stock certificate, etc. He wanted to make sure there
was absolute final clearance. So that is why we listed it
Page 79 of 523
I am going to turn this over to the group. Last week I was in Pittsburgh; I got lucky; I
was working with another broker/dealer and they mentioned the fact that they were
looking at the Philadelphia Stock Exchange because of potential savings to their
operation in terms of trades and trading. I went to Philadelphia and spent some time
with those people. It turns out, at least from what I was able to gather (again I am not
a back office man, so I don't understand it all), we were considering using security
selling without clearing and some other
Page 80 of 523
May 2, 1987
I
of this dmmmt is to recollect a l l activities that I've been

involved w i t h i n Financial Planning and the formation of Financial Ma~gement
G r m p , to verify and doarment seine of the activities that I've been involved in
to date.
WpupOSe
I ' m afraid that as w e go further and further there w i l l be a need for such
information especially w i t h what has h a m this past week w i t h our corporate
officers and board. F i r s t I would l i k e to begin back in ti-&very beginning so
that the f u l l scope of our activities seem to f i t into ane place and also so
that
of the issues that have mme up are tied into what has happmd up to
this point.
First of a l l , I started in the Financial Plback in 1982. After

getting out of the amtracting kusiness I took six weeks and traveled across
the country and came back and decided to get into the financial services
Being that several relatives have had dealings w i t h IDS, Investors
industry.
Diversified -ices,
I called the local branch in
upon finding the
manager Mmed R & e r t Kauffinan. Bab spent -time
withme, decided he w i s h e d
to hire me, and that began the process.
I was actually licensed in 1982 for securities and l i f e and was p t under the
mnagement of Bob Kauffman. Shortly thereafter, I would say probably in Jwe
or July, Bab was pmmDted and took a division in Tampa, Florida. Myself and
)three o r four other individuals who were under m g e m e n t decided that w e
wanted to fom a g r w p together so w e talked to anather district manager,
Staren H. and decided that, i f he would allm, we kcdd like to plt an office
together w i t h him.
A t this time w e did not have an office and he was mrkjng
out of a sndll office in Millersville. 'Ihe people who were with me was myself,
Mike Hartlett and Alan Loss. The three of us were very, very large producers,
especially Mike and Alan.
The three of us were probably larger than Steve's
district a t that time, so a t that point we located an office a t 255 Wer
Avenue, we walked under Staren H. district which increased his inmme by a t
least 30% to 40% pthat -&ion.
After being involved in the business I decided that firrancial planning should
be wre abjective and fee based, so I became one of the larger fee producers
using fees as w e l l as mmnisSion incane. A t about the same time, I became
involved i n the IntermtiAssociation of Financial Planners. A t that time
the local chapter was just being fonwd and I volunmy services to help
on the board.
Menbrs of the board, a t that time, was just being formed and
headed by John Herr.
I became m t i v e vice president and virtually helped
run the chapter and
build it to its largest m
p
. lhat gave m e
as f a r
the apportunity t o meet other people, broaden my horizons and *tian
as the financial planning h3ustry and just haw the hleperdent planners f i t
into the stream of the industry. I had quite a b i t of activity and did alot
for the local chapter and became very involved.
helm
Property of Advanced Media Group
Page 1 of 13
Page 81 of 523
02/17/2007
mer the next several years I made a very gwd living. I was never a very big
pmducer, althmgh one of the bigger ones in the Harri.skurg division. But I
was not the biggest, but the premier fee producer for the division and was om
of the leading in the camtry a t that time. I shortly became kmmledgable of
the other pmfucts available in the financial services industry and learned
very quickly that it w a s virtually inpossible to have one canpany manufacture
and produce ccpnpetitive products across the line. A t this the I was setting
l
e Amstrong
up a dhmr meeting for the IFP that was going to sbax2ase A
who was one of the premier planners i n the cumtry. She was very visible and
very widely m. I set up a dinner meeting for her khich attracted close of
om hundred
p r o f e s s i o n a l s a n d o t h e r p e o p l e t o a ~ . l h i s w a s f o u r o r five
times larger that any ather meetirg the chapter had ever had. A f t e r the
meeting I was involved in a -ion
w i t h Alex regarding the financial
planning h l d z y and my aspirations of what was cutside of a pmpriety
envimmnmt.
I told her that I was thinking of lMking a m e and asked her i f
she had any suggestions of wha to q e a k to. A t this point in time, we were all
i n Butler Avenue and Bob Kaufhan was in Georgia, running a division of ID6
back there.
He, a t this time, had become one of the l a q e s t divisional
n g e r s and had shwn very high pm&active
recruith-q skills. He was running
one the largest shop= intheScuthEastandwasbexdtqveryprofitable for
II1S. Alex suggested that I c a l l a gentlwen by the name of John &&le who was
then president of Financial Services COT. a bmkerjdealer based in A t l a n t a ,
Georgia. A t this the Bob Kauffman was probably, as unfamiliar i f not mre
unfamiliar, of the irdependent e n v k m e n t available to the Fimrcial Services
Industry. Specifically Financial Planners.
I phaned Bob a n d t o l d h i m t h a t I w a s ~ i n g t o l o a l c a n d ~ ~ t e l s e w a s l ~ o u t
there."
Before this time, a ccuple months prior, I atb&& a career
conference in Florida with IRS. A t one p i n t I was in a roam w i t h Bob Ihufhan
and R
' mt TUmr, who was the biggest divisicmal l ~ ~ g aet this
r
time with ID6.
I began to disc;uss my dissatisfaction with the ccmparry and the way that they
op=rate and I suggested to them that it pmbably would not be too difficult to
duplicate an organization instead of bebg built araYd a proprietary that was
built solely amund a non-proprietary product. A t the time they both leaked a t
w and I don% m m a k e r i f they l a w , k u t the idea really didn't redlly
interest them, and it just rolled off their shailders. Right after this
meeting is whenIhadthedinnermeetingvithAlexandIsetupthemeetingin
A s I usually did, I always leaked a t Bob Kaufhan as my mentor. H e
virtually w w o f f t h e s t r e e t s a n d m m e a w a y t o w m y i n a w a y
that I never
I a u l d w. I always respected Bob as a very good
sal.esnan, seeming to have a very high financial intellect and I looked up to
him as he taught me alot. So I got on the phone and told him I was going to
v i s i t an imkpn%& planner i n Atlanta.
A t this time, Bob was bemning
dissatisfied with the management of ID6 and was not very happy with the way
they were using him to build areas. Vihen the areas would become profitable to
him they waild mehimtoanotherdistressedamatobebuiltup. Sohewas
doing a l l the work and ID6 was making a l l the mmey because they waild plt i n a
m a ~ g e rfor less money and so on and so forth.
Atlanta.
Page 2 of 13
Page 82 of 523
02/17/2007
On Nw&
27 or 28 of 1985, I had a meeting w i t h Bob I c a u f m and Mike
Hartlett a t 1 4 x b n r s m u n t on the Rahrerstawn M,
Ianaster, PA. 'me
pupose of the meeting was to find art i f we a u l d collectively p r t together
xmething in Iancaster w i t h regards to f h i a l planning. I wwld say that
e t i n g was mre of an effort on my part than anyone especially Mike Hartlett.
Mike was, a t this time, also inrlependent, l e f t ID6 anl follckied me to FSC along
w i t h Bob.
?he meetingwas on themorning a t 9:00 a.m. and we dkmxxxdwhat
options we had as far as w i n g sanething tcgether in Iancaster. I guess the
bsic reason for the meeting was to see i f Mike Hartlett wished to do sanething
together w i t h us. A t this time I was qmating my practice, Mike was aperating
his practice, anl the only
we had in amumn w a s a reception man
adjoining ax offices.
A t thistimeBobsawthatifwecculdputsawthbg
together in Lancaster he omld pmbably f u l f i l l same of his recruiting
-ts,
giving h i m a place to actually xecmit people to rather than
using FSC in Atlanta. So that began the process of w i n g together a shop in
lancster and Cerrtral PA.
I b e s a n t o recruit fran that point forward into our so called plarvling firm.
A t this time the plarvling firm was going to be caprised of financial
Sane of the f i r s t pecplethatItall#dtowasMonaRishel,Dick
and Bab Lnrg. I spoke to other plannezs-about joining our firm and
then I got the idea of adding other professionals mainly legal, a m - ,
& estate and ma@ insurance. It was then that I got the idea for the one
stop financial firm.
Tbmeitseemedapprmt-thatitwasimportanttohave
a l l the individuals working tagether collectively
manage one financial
planners.
-,
'
'affairs.
It didn't seem that d i f f i d t to accaylish that i f yau had the riqht
irdividuals willing to take the risk of a t t m p t h q such a project sod who had
the clientele where they didn't have to rely on attracting new clientele.
Well, ~ t h i n g l e d t o a M t h e r a n d w e s o o n b e g a n t o r e n U i t ~ a t ~ ~ a n d
sizable grcup of individuals. I prcbably was responsible for d t i n g 90% of
the local people and artside pecple, Mike was mrking with Rick Volp in
F h i l a d e l m who he w o w w i t h a t ID6, and a hcst of others. T h e i n i t i a l core
was myself, Mike, Mma, Dick Sherisahn.
A t thistimeIranintoSattRobertsonattheZhreeMilelhsewhowasworking
with Asset Mamgement.
I expressed the idea to him and he became interested
and became one of wr pecple. I also talked to Gmmlyn Royer who was w i t h Pru
Bache and she was interested in joinhg. By February we had a fairly large
group of people who were willing to ammit. F i r s t thing we had to do was find
facilities and Mike f d the place available a t the OregcPl Pike location which
was just urder -on.
A t f i r s t we were looking for 2,000 square feet to
hcuse f w or five i n a i v i d ~ ~ LA~t. this time I talked to Tim Lanza, people a t
the legdl firm, and Danny Beqer as f a r as doing me thing with real
estate.
It was s q p x e 3 to beanaperationfinancedandsqportedbyFSC.
horn December until May FSC was pranking furd to f h m c e the aperation. We
nedd start up funks for fur nit^^?=, caymter systems, salaries for myself and
Mike for ranaging the -tion.
Mat happerred &ing this t h was that FSC
was constantly premising us financing and we had yet to receive any actual
m ~ n e yand the invoices d t t e d w e r e never paid by FSC.
Page 4 of 13
Page 83 of 523
02/17/2007
Bob then told rn that he may be willing to go intD the meeting w i t h me under
the asslrmption that I did not tell them who he was o r who he was w i t h . I
called J&n m l e and told him I wanted to cane dawn and v i s i t him, being
referred by Alex and he was very nice mer the @mne, giving me a cordial
invitation to cane down and actually had me set up the meeting w i t h Ray S m i t h
who was one of the sales ~ g e r s .I set up a two day meeting w i t h myself and
this anonymxls person, Bab KaufBnm.
W e spent two daysatFSCandwhat
essentially happened is that they became infatuated w i t h Bob's recruiting
skills.
On the spat they offered Bcb a position within the a m p n y as far as
recruiting and head of sales manqement of FSC.
I resigned fm m6 January 1985.
Bob m i n d a t ID6 and fnm Octaber to
March w a s negatiating his position and pay and his -tion
w i t h FSC. By
March he actually decided to resign fmn ID6 and he was a k a r h d into the
corporate structure of FSC. January Ist I resigned fmm IS. I was Upstairs
w i t h Mike Harllett, sharing an office space and the rest of district w i t h Alan
Lms was still dwEbks.
A t this time, I began to build my independent
practice of Financial Planning. Basically I took 95% of my clients fmm IC6
and began working w i t h them. Bob began working i n the national recruiting for
FSC and started attracting IDS people to FSC.
1985 I had became w i n t e d w i t h my business l i f e , not

learning
lonely being hkprk3ent and I became frustmted. I knew that
no one in Lancaster was doing a very high quality m i c e rqardbg Financial
laming and Financial Services.
Tb me, lancaster seemedtobeahighly
By
the
Fall of
m,
attractive market w i t h alot of wealth being spread cut amDng alot of different
No one was being creative
r " lg their efforts it was just three
players.
o r four brokerage houses, insurance agents, banks and irdependent planners but
iw one had a very strcarg p i t i o n or d a b a x e in the financiae services
-.
I visited w i t h Bcb Kauffman in the Fall of 1985 as I usually did every ccuple
mths ard told him I wished to do scwthing else. A t t h a t time he asked me i f
I wanted t o cane dam to Atlanta and help him work on the concept of o n p n y
awned shops.
W h a I was dawn there, he mmtioned severdl positions i n the
corpration that I may be ini n and he set up a meeting w i t h me and
Steve Franklin.
Stwe m t l y needed smmw to m a ~ g eh i s national sales
office so khj dawn there I spoke to him, just t o verify w h a t was available.
A t this meeting, Steve Fmnklin more of less indicated t h a t I was a ~~kuned
cut
who was just leaking for a place to go. Ncrthing ever happen& and I
left the meeting w i t h very l i t t l e respect for Steve Franklin.
Bob offered me a position w i t h i n his mnpany owned store, writing cases doing
p l m , doingsaneotherthings. CIhatwasearlyOctober. F o r t h e n e x t t h r e e o r
four weeks I prepared myself, relwtmtly, for the transition and moved to
Atlanta and tried to maintain clients up he^^ as well, and plrsue whatever Bob
was doing down in Atlanta. A s th went on I f e l t I really didn't wish to move
away fmn the area and that maybe the opportunity down there wasn't what I
thought it was, o r wasn'twhat Bab said it was.
Page 3 of 13
Page 84 of 523
02/17/2007
Bob ~ ~ a u f f u n n
was the liaison and -tly
was being directed by Stare
Franklin ard Jdyl m l e . F'ran what I have learned over the past several years
was that they never really interded to finance the aperation brt they were
strirqirq us along ard using us to recruit other people to the operation.
After we rexuited ten o r more people it became apparent t h a t Mike o r myself
g e an operation. We also
did not have the managing skills required to l ~ ~ such
learned we l o s t our financial backing, so we had to figure out what to do with
A t this time we decided to raise the capital a.u-selves,
finance the
financing.
And
operation auselves with quity we raised thmqb the planners.
essentially we learned that no one i n the industry, or very few actually awn
their awn business but are only a distrikrtion for a f i n a d a l product. W e a l l
have seen bmkr/dealers b e b g b a q h t and sold for very sizable m t s of
m y , usually in the vacinity of $1 of quity for $1 of gross ccrmnission
inmne.
We began to see t h a t we were seeing anyi&em hran $1 million of gross
amnksion imxms per year w i t h the grcrup that we had. In the grarp was Ken
Ray and some very m t i v e and talented people.
cur m e e t h p and discussiuns d c h w e r e very long, durable and
mpn L&omber t o May I probably spent every other evening with Bob
tiresame.
i n Atlanta trying to pt this deal together.
Tbx@mt
L e t me go over a couple of other things that had happened up to that time that
I f d ljke mentianed in this document, before I fozget. Back in the sunmer of
u
s
e of
1985, I was contacted by Jdyl Fhilips fmn Blue Pall National Bank. m
)ny v i s i b i l i t y w i t h the local chapter of the IFP J d m wanted to call me and look
a t the o p t i c u s of Blue Bas11 National Bank becane involved in Financial
Planning.
Jchn called a meeting w i t h me ah3 I believe he was looking for
scanmne to head a Financial deparbnent with inside Blue Pall National Bank o r
contract w i t h s ~ n e o n e outside. I had 1-1/2 bar with J d m and his suborbant,
whcan I can't remember his name, I believe it was Joe. H e was the vice
president of the trust m t , I believe. m
y a f t e r the meeting they
did not have the fiath o r the confidence that I was the right person or they
didn't believe t h a t this was really what they wanted to do. But I have never
M firm them s i n .
Fall of 1985, before our initial meeting, a f t e r I &idea

that I was not goin g
t o relocate in Atlanta, I began to look for other options in
One of
those were t h a t a couple people pt me in tmd w i t h several banks. One was
Joe S. with -th
National Bank and another was Meridian Bank. Both of
those irdividuals received
calls fmn peoplekl I did business w i t h
stating that I was looking for s a n & h g
ard asking that they give me an
btemiew. None of them !could wen goive me an interview. I received a letter
fmn C c m k m e d t h s
t
a
m t h a t they had no pasitions c p a a t this time, but
they would keep my ram on f i l e .
Fmm Meridian, I don't believe I wen
received a letter.
aLis is oneof t h e r e a s o n s t h a t I d o n f t h a v e v e r y ~
respect for banks, or people whowork inbanks. I d o n f t w i s h t o d w e l l into
this subjed, but because of several of these eposides I just don't have mch
respect for bankers, o r banks what so ever.
-.
Page 5 of 13
Page 85 of 523
02/17/2007
Page 6 of 13
Page 86 of 523
02/17/2007
was going to receive 60,000 shares, I was to receive 40,000 shares andMike
was to receive 40,000. Also, Mike ard I w e r e to receive $3,000 per month and
Bob $5,000 per mnth. Bab and I had a deal as I did not believe he shaild have
more of the canparry than I because I pit it together. We had an agreement
&ereby
I could buy 10,000 shares of his 20,000 a t anytime a t cost so we would
both have 50,000 shares. I had papers drawn u p t o that, however, whenwe began
t o have problens, I l e f t things drop by the wayside.
Back in Februaq 1986, I became g o d friends w i t h Mary Lynn D i F o l c a , Kevin's

sister ard Mike's wife. We were always g c d friends, but back then when Kevin
left, we
very close because I spent alot of tim with them. Mary Iynn
was a t the time, 30 years old with three children, and she was always very tied
dam with the kids, basically a housewife. She never really had a job, never
worked.
I t w a s h a r d forherbecauserrmtof her other frienlswerecutworking
and had 01-eers. I a s k e d h e r i f s h e W d l i k e t o M p m e o u t f o r a f e w h o u r s
a we& doing general clerical an3 typing. She was very excited. I tho~@tit
was a chance for me to get S(II*~thirqs done ard I liked Mary Lynn alot d we
got along and I thx&t it was a chance for me to get a few extra things done.
I took her on in February and before too long she was working 30 hours a week.
She had a babysitter lined up for the kids, ard it was very encanraging for me
to see her do this because it gave her the confidence for the f i r s t time that
she could do spnethhq other than just have children. She was having a great
time and I was having a great time and.= enjoyed working with Baeh other. A t
that time, Bob invited .Mike and I down to the annual confererms in !Iwsm,
Arizorn ard w i t h the conferenoe amangments we were allawed to take saneone,
such as your spouse. I asked Mary Iynn i f she wanteA to go and I don't believe
she was ever on a plane before and she asked Mike and he said it waild be good
for her t o meet scme of these peqle and get: involved w i t h a career. We ended
up d a m a t Tucson ard that was i n A p r i l 2 a n d w e s p e n t f m o r f i v e d a y s
there.
Upon meeting Bob ItoldhimIwasbringingMaryLynnoutandIhew
from the start that this was a sore spot. First of a l l she was married d he
couldn't urdershtd what she was doing cut there w i t h me. Semnl of a l l he
didn't appreciate the whole s i b t i a n when he met her he said scauethbq to the
effect that she looked very young.
After the secand day w e were a l l g c d
ard she was getthq a l a q very w e l l w i t h W and Pam. In fact, Pam
friends
confided things in her that I kmm Pam never told anyone. It looked as thcaigh
they liked, or a t least pretmxkd to like Mary Lynn and so anyway we all had a
Bcb, myself, andMikespent&of
w r t i m inindividualprivate
good time.
meetings trying t o pt this deal together and work cut the details -idly
with FSC.
think it was back a t this time-we r e a l i z e d that Bob was probably going to
fran management and cannit and cane up to Lancaster. I think one of the
reasons whyMaryLynn andIbecameveryclosewasthatsheremindedmesonuch
of my mother i n t&
way that she handled her kids, family and I became
infatuated w i t h that.
I liked her alot. Wt haFpened was that Mike and Bob
resented the fact that we had so rmch fun while we worked. We got m r k done,
but we went out t o lunch for an hour or so and we really enjayed things. To
I
resign
'
them that had no place in business. For me, as 1as I got my work done, I
f e l t better about my work ard it worked art for the best. mis w a s a problem
an3 w i l l ccmne up later.
Page 7 of 13
Page 87 of 523
02/17/2007
Page 8 of 13
Page 88 of 523
02/17/2007
into the building, they wmld not a l l m Mary Iynn to be back in my

haever, Nancy A. 's desk was right ma& up against Mike's door. lhis
start& all the problem w i t h Mary Lynn. She saw that and she wished to work
for me, and they were not goiiig to let her. It just started problem fmn day
one and it had a tmmxdms impact on the relationship between me, Mike and
Bob.
'Ibis was the straw that broke the camels back as f a r as cur relationship
was wncen-ed.
Ever sincethathKpenedwestoFpedcamunicating. matwas
the f i r s t m e i n trying to rescind m y i n p r t a n d m y o m t m l s o f a r a s t h e
campany was c0ncxm-d.
As f a r as the staff was ooncerned they had a feeling
that the staff should be treated as dirt and made this urderstxm3 many times to
me
this is against a l l my philasophy of life. For months, because of this
attitude, Mere were problems with the staff. It was because of this t h a t the
staff didn't respect them, and it was just a formths.
We w e d
section,
July and August, Bab w a s still d m in Atlanta and I was doing

the work i n lancaster. Fmn J a n u a ~
until
~
Januray I took one day off
for Memrial Day, one day for July 4th, one day for labor Day and cme day for
'Ihanksgiving.
Mike H a r t k t t took off two of three becks, leaving m e to tend
the shop.
I was always the care doing all the work, recruiting, stock
offering,labor m a t t e r s , drew up all the amtmcts, drew up the offering
w i t h the help of the attorney. It was fiwry t h a t I was the only one
raising the mney
probably 808 of the furls. I was the only care of the
principals who had outsiders investing i n the canpany. Ihe most they did: Bob
Kauffman raised $5,000 frun his father in law, so not d y did I pit my cwn
mney i n I risked that of my clients. But they w e r e willing to a a q t t h a t up
front.
A carple times it came down to either me getting the m m q fmn my
clients o r us not having the financial a b i l i t y to pay off sane of the capital
resources that we had.
W i n g June,
most of
~~
W i n g %pteubr we began to have pmblems w i t h Mazy Lynn and the staff and
me.
'Ihis was the beginning of them hying to reduoe and dilute my control of
the canpany as f a r as input was cancerned.
It was a very emotional and
d
r
a
m expsriexe a f t e r a l l t h e w o r k I d i d t o p l t t h i s a l l t o g e t h e r t o f i n d
those twowere trying to plsh me cut. Itrsachedthepointinoctoberor
Noventer where they actually asked me i f I wanted to "get out." 'Ihqr indicated
that I was not right for m a ~ g & ,
m a ~ g e m e n twas nat right for me, t h a t I
wasn't having fun and all this and that. Mnst of t h a t was due to their action
as f a r as their trying to dilute me and weaken my umfidenz. lhey c0Ntantly
made fun of me i n f m n t of all the other planners a t meetings and it was just
ugly.
'Ihey also t r i e d to internqj my relationship w i t h Mary LyM w h i c h was
ruthirq mxe than a very p e r s a d , deep fri-p.
No care lamws this, kR the trauma was so heavy that I went mxier the care of a
Hospital, beginning N m m h e r and I was suffering a
psychologist a t St. J@
severe case of depression. Eecause of d z @ r e n i a being f a v d in my family,
I was not afraid to go seek psydmlogical camseling. I was on medication for
three months.
Page 9 of 13
Page 89 of 523
02/17/2007
In September they had it in their minds that they were going to get r i d of Mary
Lynn.
And they tried every opporbmity, finally in N o v e n h r a week before
Thanksgiving, they fired Mary LyM. W i t h o u t cause, for no reason, other than
they just wanted her art ard felt she was incapable of whatever. It actually
reached the point wfiere Bob andMikewhenarnurr].politickingthebrokersto
s q p r t them t h a t M a r y L y M w a s n u t d o i n g h e r j o b w h i c 3 1 w a s m t t r u e . Shehad
the canplete w
r
t of a l l the brokers. Maybe a t times there was a case wfwe
sawom was unhappy w i t h her perfommce, but in general it was a ploy, a plot,
fabricated by Mike and Bcb.
their attarpt to lmy me out and get rid of me so far as my Oontrol and my
interest, I held cut reluctantly often times mxlering i f I were going to give
in an3 by 0lristma.s I decided I wnuld stick it cut. 'Ihere
not other
alternatives, kR the nwney they offered me to get out was $2,50 a share which
canes out to $100,0000.
Iwantednopartsof it, s o b y J a n u a r y I d e c i d e d t o
stay.
After
Bob h a d s e v e r a l c a n v e r ~ a t i ~ ~ l ~ w i t h B o b I c n g s a y i n g t h a t h e w a s ~ i e d a b o u t m y
v
i
a
l efforts and that I was heocming slack. Ihe whole reason was
that they were hamering me daJnandbeatingmeupineverywaytheycculd,
cktmying my confidence. AftarIspenttimeandeffortardIbelieved inso
nu& of Wmt I'd done, and they were trying to take this away franme and get
me art of the picture.
Thraqh N o v and
~
Decc&er
there were meetings between myself, Scott
R c h r k x m , Alan Loss, Bob Long and (luo1ynFlayer rqanibq the activities and
the ~ S t y l e s o f M i k e a n d B o b . ~ w e r e v e r y ~ , w e r e n o t v e r y
trusting and I was always in the middle between the managerwt and financial
planners.
I had relatiMships with everyone and I believe that this -tend
Bob and Mike ard they tried t o g e t m e c u t o f thepicture, kttheplanners
wxlld not allcu this because the planners did not trust Bob and Mike w i t b a r t
havingme to keep them on balance.
I raised most of
the nomy, d t e d lnost of the people, p t the offering

together, pit the ampter system tcgether, workedwithall the
ampter softwa??=, and a c t u d l l y . came up with the name Firnncial Management
(;mup and the idea of having a l l the subsidiaries doing different things. My
involvement was very deep, pmbably deeper than anyone in the organization.
memo-
W - m I w a s p l t t i n g a l l t h i s t o g ~ , I w a s i n ~ w i t h A l n Y u l a tItalked
.
abaR having nnr@age,
banking a part of a t I was doing. Nathing ever
happened bebeen the two of us, but in ~anuaryI received a call fran Al askhq
me to see i f I a d d place any mrtgages in the east coast. H e was willing to
pay me xmghly one half a point and this was a t a time, because of the
activities of Bob and Mike, that I tku$~tI would give this a t r y to give me
sane secwity. Should saoething f a i l i n the canpany, I would have sanething to
f a l l back an. A t this time I involved Scott IInbertscn and Bob ~cngand I told
them we would form a three way w
p and we wnuld work an a real estate
project on cur awn. ' I h e r e a s o n I t o l d n o o n e a b c u t t h i s w a s t h a t t h i s w a s m y
ace card in case Bob and Mike ever really threw n~ out. I was mt going to give
&em any r e l a t i m s h i p , and I j u s t TIE&&
sane d t y .
Page 10 of 13
Page 90 of 523
02/17/2007
we were really doing was lwkirg for 1of 2 millicm dollars and up to
refinance or finance new and existing realestateprojects. Wemadeafew
calls, finding that ax rates are very anpetitive.
A l was mre of less
letting me get plqged into the major Savings and Loans and Inswaxe
mnpanies.
Wefam3cuttherewereveryfewpeopleinthearea, i f a n y a t a l l
who could a q u b s the terms. We began having a great deal of success and what
we found was that almcst everyone was allawing us to bid on their project. We
created a campany called C!rekive Finance Caopany so that we would not a p x e
Fm; t o any l i a b i l i t i e s as far as cur activities. W e agreed fmn the beginning
that FIG wxild receive a m t a g e of cur activities ~IXI
we figured 15%was
f a i r since we actually mnufacturd the pIoduct wfiere FIG *en cut and used
othex manufactured products. We didn't feel they were entitled to a 20 30%
split.
What
of cur amtmzts was w i t h Tony Bongoivi in New York. He a t one time dated
Scott's
sister apprmhmtely ten years ago.
Scott maintained a loose
relationship w i t h Tony, calling him one= in a while regarding business m a t t e r s
and business activities. Scott called Tony one day atcut a real estate project
that he i3mught
Tony said no, but he my have another
project that we would be interested in. Scott asked m e to go up to New York
with him to talk abcxlttheprojectand1 askedwhat itwas. He indicatedit
was a mwie.
I was very reluctant and hesitant to do this because nnvies t o
me, tax shelters, scans, not very econcmic type investment. Me being very
comxvative was not attracted, but I decided to go anyway just to get cut of
town, mre or less just to get away.
(Xle
I got up t h e n I was totally amazed a t the caliber and the people who we
were associating w i t h .
What I found cut was that we were working w i t h the
leading recolding s h d i o in the world. T h e r e d t i a l s , their acccnplidxm~ts
were @enmaml- they were just it. I'm not going to spend alat of time of
this because just the battcm line is what is inporbnt here. After seeing the
project wfien I lcoked a t what Tony was doing, and fran a business perspective
there were just so nary elewnts in this project that were just truly amazing
to me so far as distribution and markeI5.g and riskand eveqtAi.q else.
Bottan line was a pruluct that was worth 15 to 20 million dollars being made
for 4 million w i t h the ability to be one of the -1
movie, video projects
of the years.
biten
a l l ycu have the leading recoxding studio in the world working on the
scan3 for the project that was going to include a follaw up of Tony's previous
band who- was BM Javi who was alreacty one of the hottest thing in nusic as far
as alkum sales.
Then you have the fact that he was going to digitize the
recording which was never done before in the nnvie industzy a t a time when the
vidm market is just going bananas. N o t only that, hut the label that signed
the banl m MN.
You put a l l this together and ycu've got a penmend
business w i t h alot of apportunity
F i r s t of
Page 11 of 13
Page 91 of 523
02/17/2007
seeing this, I ammitt& myself to the project not kmwing h o , where or haw we
were going t o raise 4 million dollars but I beliwed in the project so mplch. I
guess because I saw alot of the same elements used in F% in this project, and
even more.
I got instincts when I raised money for Em; I was still very
concerned with the risk elements to my investo~sbut when I looked a t this
project the risk was even less. Iess risk, m r e protection with this project
so I believed in this project. We spent seven or eight weeks developing the
packaging the product for the investors, things have hapxwd during that time
that f e l l into place perfectly
the a r t i c l e in lblling Stone, the marketing.
is May 4 t h a t 4:30 a.m. and there is no d a b t inmyminlwith the articles

in Rolling Stone that we have the money for the m i e . lhat project in itself
w i l l pmbably p t us in the forefront of the n
e
industry within
It
eight W.
It is mird b o g g l i n g a s f a r a s h t o n c a a e o f t h i s , b u t t h e
project is done, we did sanethjrq, we did not use Fm;, they w i l l receive no
I guess what I'm saying ik that because of the way Bob and Mike treated
split.
me or plshed me to go cut and do things, that did not involve Em; and I did not
feel that they did not deserve to becarre a part of these things. Fran the
beginning I knew Em; was going to get their piece.
L e t me go back to an earlier developlwt a m c e m h g the E!mker+er.

We of
course thought in the begthat we would becarre ax own broker/dealer.
However, after long, bard discussion, we were to the pint of getting a license
for brokerldealer, we decided we did not have the admhktmtive capacity to
N f i l l what we waild need to a-lish
the broker/dealer. Back in Nwember,
-,
Bcb started soliciting other -/dealer,
l c o k h ~for
~ three things;
service, high pay cut, and
equity.
We knew that we had t o own our
brolerldealer kusiness.
'Ihere were two players that we came a
m one was
Iiikkml-m cut of wshhqhl DC and the other was Financial P l a m e ? s Group
which really involves sane of the premier financial planners of the cumtry,
B i l l I b q l e r , Wayne Webster, so on and so forth.
The Iceogler grarp was strcng, large, y a q and they were doing nxghly 20
million dollars of gross canmission incane per year but there were saoe people
in the organizaticm we did not feel ccmfortable with. Hikbaxd Brrx~nwas a new
start up, starting up when we did, was a s p l i t f m a previous bmker/Mer in
D.C.,
that involved f m a syrdiotor to a -/dealer
that no one knew
anything a?xut. However, they really enticed us w i t h a very attractive equity
deal.
Bob maintained most of the cmmmications and mmt of the research
involved in this project.
It was brcqht to us in January w h i c h was IpuFplly
20% of their stock . w i t h 90% payout , territorial with override for aqthirg
that w e did.
Page 12 of 13
Page 92 of 523
02/17/2007
0fthethingsImtshaildbedoneisthatscmeaneMdbedownthere
a t their t m d i q department, along with the capability of FSC. I tried
to get people down there several tims and I suggestd Qmlyn Royer because of
what had haFpened to her.
Finally Peter Pnneros and Ken Ray bent down, and
this was probably during U a x h . Anyway, this whole thing was dcne w i t h very
l i t t l e mmmicaticn as f a r as me, Bob and Mike. lbre of less, Bob wculd go
cut and do scanethirq and wculd fee3 back to us, but we redlly had very l i t t l e
involvement with what we into do w i t h M Bnmn. One thing Bob
irdmted w a s t h a t i f w e b e n t d o w n t o K i b b a r d m w e w c u l d n o t f i n d i r m c h , they
were just starting up, they were new, they had rmghly 10,000 sq. foot of
office space, a few staff people and the system of operation. He did feel they
w e r e capable of fulfilling cur needs.
One
1
-
the transformation of licensing fmpn FSC to Hilhxd-Bnmn and we

prcbably had 60% to 70% of the in house w l e to FSC, Alan Inss, Scott
Robertsan, Rich Bravenuan, Keith Waters, R x M Dellinger, Kazly Radcliffe, along
with Barry Schuttler and sapne of the other satelites. A t this point Tan 'I\uner
was free ard clear and he was looking for scsne direction. By the week of A p r i l
19th
Tcm was up v i s i t k g with Bob all week seeking that direction and he was
also visiting w i t h Hibbard Bnmn so it looked l i k e Tan wculd also b e a m
involved.
We began
I also negotiated the courtship of Tony Pascoti and got him involved.
Fran the perid of A p r i l 1st on, wfien we began transferring license, one of the
main
Page 13 of 13
Page 93 of 523
02/17/2007
Page 94 of 523
Page 95 of 523
Page 96 of 523
Page 97 of 523
Page 98 of 523
Page 99 of 523
Page 100 of 523
Page 101 of 523
Page 102 of 523
Page 103 of 523
Page 104 of 523
Page 105 of 523
Page 106 of 523
Page 107 of 523
Page 108 of 523
Page 109 of 523
Page 110 of 523
Page 111 of 523
Page 112 of 523
Page 113 of 523
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEHENTS, C o n t i n u e d
2.
Investments:
A summary o f
i n v e s t m e n t s is a s f o l l o w s :
/
.
i
:
..-.
December 31, 1986
fioney market funds

Bonds, debentures
and notes:
U.S. and foreign
governnent
obligations
Corporate bonds,
notes and convert ible debentures
Carmen and preferred
stocks
Insurance group
annuity contracts
4,427,800
35,103,995
$
4,427,800
5,774,937
Value
Cost
6,399,600
39,445,939
5,049,732
_ _ _-
Decanber 31, 1985
Value
Cost
/,
.:
.. .
6,399,t
34,665,221
37,598,:
9,738,720
$ 10,341,'
55,056,018
65,421,820
49,214,679
61,623,t
26,536,945
26,536,945
25,454,347
25,454,
P u r c h a s e s and sales of s e c u r i t i e s o t h e r t h a n United S t a t e s

Government o b l i g a t i o n s a g g r e g a t e d 5 3 6 , 9 7 1 , 2 8 1 and $34,885,320
i n 1 9 8 6 , a n d $23,754,759 a n d $ 2 2 , 6 3 8 , 0 9 3 i n 1985, r e s p e c t i v e l y .
P u r c h a s e s a n d s a l e s o f U n i t e d S t a t e s Government o b l i g a t i o n s ,
o t h e r t h a n s h o r t - t e r m T r e a s u r y b i l l s , a g g r e g a t e d $887,762 and
$ 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 i n 1 9 8 6 a n d $887,761 a n d 5 1 , 0 0 0 , 3 4 9 i n 1 9 8 5 , r e s p e c t i v e l y .
Continued
6
Advanced Media Group
Page 114 of 523

Page 21 of 21

10/05/2007
Page 115 of 523
Page 116 of 523
Page 117 of 523
Page 118 of 523
Page 119 of 523
Page 120 of 523
Page 121 of 523
Page 122 of 523
Page 123 of 523
Page 124 of 523
Page 125 of 523
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advisory, Inc.
11, 1755 Oregon Pike
Lancaster, PA 17601
717-569-4100
FINANCIAL Y A I U l i E M E N I GIOUC 1 1 0
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
PRESIDENT
By: stan caterbone
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Page
Page126
1 ofof111
523
Page 1 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page127
2 ofof111
523
Page 2 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SONY JOINTcVENTUREPROPOSAL
"SONY CHALLENGE"
SONY JOINT VENTURE STATISTICS
INVESTOR MARKETING MATERIALS
LEGAL DOCUMENTATION
SCREEN PLAY (1ST DRAFT)
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page128
3 ofof111
523
Page 3 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
THE DIGITAL MOWE

A Joint Venture Proposal for
The Sony Organization
Developed by:
Stan J. Caterbone
Representing:
Tony Bongiovi
Power Station Studios
Flatbush Films
Garnillion Studios
Advanced Media Group, Ltd.,
beated in May ~f 1987
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page129
4 ofof111
523
Page 4 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
SONY CORPORATION
INTRODUCTION
SONY'S ROLE
TIMING
MARKETING AND DISTRIBUTION
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
FINANCIAL STRUCTURE
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page130
5 ofof111
523
Page 5 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
INTRODUCTION
Tony Bongiovi and Power Station Studio are undertaking a project
that has the potential of revolutionizing the entertainment industry.
In the next few pages of this proposal, I will outline the elements
involved and how Sony can participate in this landmark event.
The technology of the recording industry has been advancing by
leaps and bounds. We have seen the advances from monaural
long playing record to stereo record to compact disc. Now we are
seeing tape systems that use digital rather than analog signals
appear, matching the quality of compact discs. What has
happened to the theatre's? The audio portion of a film, is as
responsible for the sensations one experiences at a motion picture
as the visual, yet many theatre's are still equipped only for mono
sound. Why is this? We feel there are two basic reasons.
1>
The relative high cost of upgrading a theatre to be able to

incorporate the advanced technologies of the audio
industry.
2> The lack of proper equipment for the film industry to

produce high quality digital audio tracks.
These two problems should not be addressed separately. There
is little motivation for upgrading until the product is available and
even less motivation to produce a product that can not be heard.
Tony Bongiovi and Ed Evans at Power Station in New York, have
now made it possible to address these problems simultaneously.
Their creation of the new "Power Station Digital Movie Sound"
(PSDMS), will not only enable the film industry to produce the
highest quality audio tracks for film, but will also allow theatre's to
upgrade their existing sound system at a minimal cost.
To introduce this revolutionary new sound, Bongiovi is in the
process of producing a film entitled "Mutant Mania", which is a
science fiction action horror film, shot in a small ocean resort town
in New Jersey. This film has many elements that make it perfect
for the introduction of PSDMS. The most prevalent of these being
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page131
6 ofof111
523
Page 6 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
the heavy music score by Bongiovi's latest band "French Lick".

Producing bands is definitely one of Bongiovi's fortes. Bongiovi
was instrumental in creating "Bon Jovi" who is probably the
strongest force in the rock and roll circuit today. "Bon Jovi's" third
album "Slippery When Wet", has sold more copies in a short
period of time than any other band in history.
Another is the fact that this is a horror film. The use of audio in
horror films is important to create tension, fear, excitement etc..
Using a horror film also lessens the influence the critics have on
the audience.
By the large this film will stand on it's own merits. Now add
PSDMS, and you have a potential block buster event.
How does Sony fit into all of this?
SONY'S ROLE
What we are seeking to do, is establish a distribution route in
which the message of Sony's new technology and its benefits can
be more easily and directly passed on to the consumer.
Picture a one or two minute commentary at the beginning of the

movie and home video, demonstrating the difference between the
quality of theatrical sound now and the new SONY/PSDMS sound.
This does two things. First, by demonstrating the difference in
quality of the new sound, you reinforce in the audiences mind that
it is much better, which as you will hear, there is little doubt.
Secondly it reinforces in the audience that Sony truly is a pioneer
of advanced innovative technologies.
In addition to the commentary, Sony will receive credits on the film,
ie. SONY/PSDMS. We will include in the copyright agreement that
Sony equipment must be used to be SONY/PSDMS.
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page132
7 ofof111
523
Page 7 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Sony's name will also be strategically placed throughout the film.

This may be done in the form of billboards, advertisements, or
Sony equipment being utilized.
A commercial may be developed for n/ promoting both the film
and Sony's contributions to advanced audio techniques in the film
industry. This could be done as a joint venture between Sony and
the distribution company for the theatrical and video exhibition.
Inside every video tape that is sold, a coupon may be placed to
promote Sony products.
A full line of quality equipment may be SONY/POWER STATION
labeled for consumer use to enhance marketability of Sony
entertainment products.
Sony Video Software Corporation will receive right of first refusal
on all contracts for video and theatrical distribution. We will allow
Sony a preferred 5% margin under any other distributor for a
competitive edge.
TIMING
Timing is crucial in a project that touch so many different
areas.
MARKETING1DISTRIBUTION
Most of the industry by their own admission is at least two years
away from an effort to upgrade the sound in movie theatres. With
the SONY/PSDMS system, other companies may adapt easily and
economically to produce products with digital movie sound. With
companies adapting to this process, the future should see the
prominence of the SONY/PSDMS insignia much the same as you
see the Dolby insignia today. This will act as a constant reminder
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page133
8 ofof111
523
Page 8 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
to the public that Sony truly is a pioneer of advanced audio visual

technologies.
Sony will receive exposure in the professional market place by
having the SONY/POWER STATION equipment used in theatres
and studios to produce the SONY/PSDMS sound.
The video industry is a 56 billion dollar industry that is in need of
product. When you look at the potential for a product that will be
one of the first feature films to compliment the fast paced
VCR/Stereo Entertainment components, with a musical score that
may have enough merits of its own, you have an amazing potential
for distribution.
The Digital and Disc Industry has proven to be the future standard
for recording and playing. Because of the relative newness of the
digital format, there are more people who have yet to experience
the digital sound. With the high exposure that will come from this
project, this could be the first time ever people hear digital. How
many people? 1 - 10 - 50 - 100 million?
What will be their first reaction? I need to buv a Disc Plaver!
Who's name will they think of first? SONYIPSDMS!
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
Bongiovi and Evans at Power Station have developed a
revolutionary hybrid mixing console to penetrate the video post
production market. This console was developed to enable
engineers to produce high quality audio tracks for the film industry
as well as the recording industry. This new console utilizes an
automation system that can be used by both industries. This new
console is especially atractive to the film industry, as it will greatly
reduce production costs since mixing costs in a recording studio
are much less. At present the console that is being used is a
bastardized system that utilizes components from many different
pieces of equipment, from a number of different companies, of
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page134
9 ofof111
523
Page 9 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
which Sony is one. Because we already have a working model of

this console, it would take very little time for a finished product to
be manufactured that could carry the SONY name.
The other piece of equipment that is essential to the PSDMS
process, is the box that enables the laser disc to automatically
read the synchronization track encoded on the film. This piece of
equipment can be produced at an extremely low cost. It is this
low cost and the fact that the theatres will not have to replace their
present projectors that make digital movie sound a reality in 1988.
We feel that with consumers demanding the same quality audio at
theatres, as they have become accustomed to with their home
entertainment systems, theatre owners will have little problem
investing the nominal amount of dollars involved, to upgrade their
theatres for digital audio. This investment could be as low as
$1000. With the cost being so low, the distribution company may
want to consider bearing the burden of this cost, if the theatre
owners agree to show Bongiovi's next three films.
FINANCIAL STRUCTURE
SONY will commit four million dollars for the production of
Bongiovi's film to be released in 1988.
We would like SONY to commit fifteen million for three to four
future products that will follow the same format as the first, so that
Bongiovi and SONY will position themselves as the pioneer and
leaders in the industry. This will not allow competition to gain
access to the marketplace until we are all firmly situated and
profitable.
Sony will only pay for expenses to produce 60 second spots.
Tony and Power Station will utilize any and all services to help
produce the spot and will allow reimbursement for only true costs
with no mark up including all of Tony's time which will be free.
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page135
10 of
of111
523
Page 10 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Power Station and Power Productions I will receive a negotiated

percentage from all revenues generated from the merchandizing
campaign of the SONY/POWER STATION products and the sale
that may result to other film studios utilizing Sony/POWER
STATION equipment in the PSDMS System.
We will receive four deluxe entertainment systems - Television,
VCR, Stereo, Etc. that is top of the line to help during the
production of the film.
The purpose of the above and all aspects of this Proposal is to let
the separate entities involved maximize their profits for their
respective talents; Bongiovi in film and music production and Sony
in manufacturing and distribution of equipment and merchandise
and later video and film distribution.
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page136
11 of
of111
523
Page 11 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
I THE MIGHTY YEN AND FIERCE COMPETITION ARE FORCING IT INTO NEW MARKETS
here he is, sitting on the floor of

his office with three remote controls in his hand, listening to a
Beethoven symphony a t high volume.
He recorded the symphony from a
broadcast of a recent Vienna Philharmonic concert in Tokyo, and now he's
putting the tape to good use. As much
as he likes music, Akio Morita likes trying out new stereo gear even better.
Morita is 66, and the last flecks of
black long ago vanished from his silver
hair. Although he's spending less time
@ these days in his cluttered, wood-paneled
chairman's office a t Sony Corp., it's
" clear
that Morita still provides much of
64 BWSINES W
E 1,1987'
'
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
the spark that has made the company

synonymous with the success of postwar
Japan: innovation, shrewd marketing,
and quality. As executives repeatedly
dash in for consultations, Morita patiently explains why one set of speakers he's
checking out doesn't quite have the Sony
sound.
Sony. The very name speaks volumes
about the company. It comes not from a
Japanese word that foreigners might
find W u l t to pronounce, but from
sonus, the Latin word for sound, fine
tuned for Japanese tongues. The name
symbolizes the company's origins in its
pioneering tape recorders and transistor
radios. I t also has come to signify the

international orientation among so many
mightjly successful Japanese companies.
Some 70% of Sony's sales come from
outside Japan.
~
D DOWN.
E
Recently, though, Sony
has become one of the most visible symbols of trouble in Japan. Like other Jap
anese companies in businesses ranging
from autos and steel to electronics and
computers, Sony's world has been
turned upside down. The dramatic rise
of the yen has cramped its ability to
compete in export markets. Protectionist
sentiment is growing in the U. S. and
COVER STORY
Page
Page137
12 of
of111
523
Page 12 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
back like never before. Far East competitors, such as Taiwan and South Korea,
are exploiting their lower costs, and
U. S. and European companies are
achieving efficiency gains and improvements in quality.
The high yen--endaka in Japaneseis slamming the nation's exporters two
ways. Foreign competitors with costs d e
nominated in dollars or French francs
have more room to undercut Japanese
companies on prices, and a dollar's
worth of sales is worth less in yen. Measured in dollars, Sony's U. S. sales rose
24% last year. Measured in yen, they
were down 11%. "The falling dollar has
produced a nearly 50% tax on us," complains Morita.
Overall, the numbers tell a disappointing story. Worldwide sales slipped ?%, to
$82 billion, in the fiscal year that ended
last October, while earnings from operations fell a stunning 75%. Earnings declined another 56% for the five months
ended in March from a year earlier.
Archrival Matsushita Electric Industrial
Co., by contrast, endured a more manageable 44% drop in operating earnings
last year.
For Sony, endaka is like a drought
that follows a plague of locusts. The
challenges facing Morita and his handpicked president, former opera singer
Norio Ohga, have become even more
daunting than they already were.
BETA ~ O C K Competition
.
m consumer
electronics is brutal. After coming up
AND DlVERSlFlCATlOH
A STROW6 YEN
with such hits as W i n TVS and
IS OFF SCHEDULE
ERODES EARNINGS..
Wallanan tape players, Sony watched
35
the hottest market of the 1980s,pass it
by. The company dung to its Betamax
videorecorder fmmaturhile +hp
the world switched to VAS. That s
s
was costly, and the experience helped
- - - embolden competitors. They no longer
wait to see whether Sony's innovative
10products suceeed. Rivals that took about
NONCONSUMER PRODUCTS
two years to come up with their own
AS PERCENT OF TOTAL SALES
U. S. versions of the Walkman now r e
0
'82
'83
'84 '85
'86
spond to new Sony products in months.
And the rising quality of competitors'
products has narrowed the advantage
L
J
DATA. M l l Y CQI.
that once permitted the company to
build a successful advertising campaign
around the simple phrase: "It's a Sony." says. To reduce its vulnerability to fluc- high. The company's push into nonconTo make matters worse, some of the tuations in the yen and to become more sumer areas, such as computers and im- g
most troublesome competitors are in responsive to its customers, Sony is ex- age processing, has been such tough go- 3
South Korea or other Asian countries panding its substantial manufacturing ing that Sony will not meet its timetable g
d
operations overseas. And Sony clings al- for diversification.
where costs are lower.
Other changes Could be even more
Sony has fought back. Shortly after most defiantly to one. of the company's
becoming president in 1982, Ohga set a most distinguishing characteristics: a re- traumatic. In some areas, Sony is aban- $
goal of reducing Sony's dependence on search and development budget that doning its time-honored, go-it-alone phiconsumer electrbnics by getting 50% of amounts to about Wo of sales. Rival Mat- losophy. It is sharing its technology with
other companies, for example, in an ef- 8
sales from nonconsumer products by susfiita spends only 4%.
Even for a company as innovative as fort to create industry standards for e
1990, compared with 15% a t the time.
Ohga has also served notice that execu- Sony, the changes are not coming easily. new products and to avoid another Beta- $
tives a t Sony factories must cut manu- "Our people are working very hard," max. Sony is also becoming more of a k
facturing costs beyond the 10% annual says Morita. And all 'that hard work is street fighter. It is pushing harder for
reductions of recent years. 'We need carrying Sony into some unfamiliar ter- larger shares of the markets for prodquantum leaps in cost reduction," he ritory, where the risk of missteps is ucts, even if it means paring profit mar- 3
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page138
13 of
of111
523
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
'
...
...
.
'-
- - - - -
-1
COVER STORY
Page 13 of 76
BUSINESS WEEKIJUNE 1,1987 6S
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
the company has avoided any serious

damage from the cross-fire between Tokyo and Washington. Its semiconductors
pany, which has 701 employees, is one

among a host of small regional s&
brewers in Japan. Morita & Co. also
makes miso, a fermented soybean
paste used in soups and sauces, and
shogu, or soy sauce. Under the management of Kyueaemon Morita, the
business provided a comfortable life
for his son Akio and three other children in Nagoya, an industrial city 224
m i southwest of Tokyo.
As the eldest son, Akio was expected
to take over Morita & Co. Instead, after World War 11, Morita, then 25,
threw in his lot with business novices
Masaru Ibuka and Tamon Maeda to
start Tokyo Tsushin Kogyo, or Tokyo
Telecommunications Engineering Co.
Unable to get a bank loan for their
struggling company, the trio turned to
Akio's father, who repeatedly provided
money through Morita & Co. in return
for stoek in the new venture.
AT worn r e ~ o ~
~ TaK evolved into
Sony. And Morita & Co., with Akio's
brother Kuzuaki a t the helm, has seen
some modest transformations of its
chief are legion. Even though Congress

in April rejected a oneyear ban on the
ultrahigh-fidelity digital tape recorders
recently introduced in Japan, legislators
are likely to accomplish the same objective by other means. Congress is dawdling over legislation to require that the
new products be equipped with devices
that prevent them from duplicating
tapes or records, a provision sought by
the recording industry. Richard L.
Sharp, president of Circuit City Stores
Inc., isn't expecting digital tape machines to be in his stores for a t least a
year, as Sony and other manufacturers
await a clear reading on the legislation.
Despite Sony's woes, Morita is as eager and enthusiastic as ever. He manages to sound upbeat about both the
company's functional-looking, high-performance Profeel Pro TV,which is selling well, and the 8mm handheld video
camera, which is struggling. "This year
we will recover our profits, and next
year will be a much better year," he
says. Most analysts agree that Sony has
a t least halted the slide that has
COVER STORY
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page139
14 of
of111
523
Page 14 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
-
--
- -
ers, and by the time he left for Berlin to

study voice, Morita signed him on as a
consultant. After rebuffing several entreaties by Morita to forsake his opera
career for a full-time position at Sony,
Ohga finally relented in 1959. Before b e
ing named president, however, he served
a 23-year apprenticeship that included
running Sony's tape recorder division
and a record company joint venture with
CBS Inc.
ow THE STUMP. Ohga's growing authority allows Morita more freedom for the
ambassadorial role he loves so much. He
spends about a third of his time a t Sony
these days. The rest is devoted to trips
overseas for such things as speechmaking or promoting his book, Made in Japan, and to his ceremonial functions in
Japan. Last year he became a vice-chairman of Keidanren, the Japacese federation of economic organizations.
For all his outside activities, Morita
still makes sure he gets involved in the
crucial decisions a t Sony. When it came
time to price the portable compact disk
player, for example, Morita decreed that
it be priced a t less than 50,000 yen,
about $200 a t the time. Even though the
player cost more than that to make then,
Morita correctly anticipated that the low
price eventually would generate enough
sales to provide the volume production
that would trigger economies of scale-and profits. The episode shows how
Sony is now pursuing market share
more diligently. I t is also an example of
how Sony is responding to its experience
with Betamax, the world's first home
videorecorder. This high-profile product
laid bare the company's strengths and
its weaknesses.
As conceived, Betamax was a classiciflustration of Sony's founding philosophy of looking for new markets where
bigger, wellestablished companies were
not a threat. The company correctly
foresaw the immense latent demand for
a machine that could make and play
back home videotapes. But then it ceded
the market to others by refusing to yield
when the VHS format, -first developed by
Victor Co. of Japan, provided longer r e
cording times and gradually became the
industry standard. Sony still insists that
its Beta recorders provide a superior picture. But a shrinking number of customers-currently about 5% of all buyersare buying Beta.
MlDuFe CRISIS? Some analysts think Betamax goes a long way toward explaining the new directions a t Sony. "The
Beta experience was so searing, so
threatening, that it forced a major revision in the way the company positions
itself," says James C. Abegglen, a Tokyo-based management consultant. One
example: Sony has relaxed its tradition
of sticking to the expensive, high-profit
end of the market by coming out with a
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
COVER
STORY MEDIA GROUP
ADVANCED
Page
Page140
15 of
of111
523
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
Page 15 of 76
BUSINESS WEEKfJUNE 1,198797

05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
ing," says Neil Vander Dussen, president of Sony Corp. of America.

The efforts in the U. S. and around
the world are producing some pieces of
Sony's vision of the future. Sony was
the first Japanese company with a powerful 32-bit desktop computer, which is
the heart of its engineering workstation.
It has quickly become a major producer
of full-feature telephones in Japan. Sony
also has taken the lead with the 3%-in.
floppy disks and drives that are bidding
to replace 5%-in. disks as standard
equipment on computers.
Perhaps the most impressive marriage
of video with the computer is what Sony
calls interactive video. Sterling Drug
Inc.'s Winthrop Pharmaceuticals unit
uses a van with a customcrafted version
to provide simulated demonstrations of
how its products work. The system lets
a doctor "treat" a patient with heart
failure. The doctor sees his patient going
to the emergency room, while the system provides the patient's case history
and vital signs. The patient's recovery
depends on the doctor's response to onscreen questions and choices.
one of the reasons
sales, executives now concede their time

ers of the disks themselves.
sharing technology and
2
P
eE
.8BVSlNESS WEEKIJUNE 1,1987
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page141
16 of
of111
523
Page 16 of 76
COVER STORY
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Such a move would send a strong signal that Sony has reached a new, more
mature phase of development after riding the crest of Japan's postwar economic miracle. In essence, Sony's tradition of
searching for gaps is another way of
seeking market niches-a classic approach for young companies. To keep
growing, bigger companies must also
learn to defend their existing markets
while broadening their product line.
Mastering new skills is never easy. But
Morita, now an inveterate skier, didn't
even try the slopes until he was 60.
There's no reason Sony can't accomplish
a similar feat in the business world.
against the dollar since September, 1985,

Sony was able to raise prices only about
15% in the U. S.
Moving plants overseas is only the
first step. The more difficult task will be
to integrate planning and research and
design internationally, too. But if an international staff is any measure, Sony is
well along in the integration process. Of
7,000 employees in the U. S., for example, only 150 are Japanese. Sony, virtually alone among Japanese companies, has
stuck to a policy of giving the top job in
its foreign operations to a local national.
Before long, it may become the first major Japanese company to name a foreigner as a director. A leading candidate
is Jack Schmuckli, the head of Sony's
European operations.
a strong yen. Even though having large

overseas sales makes Sony more vulnerable than most Japanese industrials, it is
already among the most international of
companies. Foreigners own 23% of its
stock, which is traded on 23 exchanges
around the world. Sony also moved early
and fast into local manufacturing. It
makes TV sets in Bridgend, Wales, as
well as in San Diego. It makes compact
disks in Terre Haute, Ind., and in Salzburg, Austria. All told, 20% of Sony's
manufacturing is overseas. It aims to
increase that to 35% by 1990. Such globalization will help Sony earn its revenues
and pay its bills in the same currency,
rather than paying workers in yen and
logging sales in a depreciating dollar.
While the yen was appreciating 50%
By Larry Armstrong i n Tokyo, with

Christopher Power and G. David Wallace
in New York
OHSOWE: EVERYTHING FROM A $32 BOX tO A $450 RECORDER WlIM-T
f all the problems besetting

Sony, the two most frustrating
are how to deal with copycat
competitors and how to mute the imp a d of the rising yen on manufadur
ing costs. But Sony has shown it can
rise to the challenge. Its experience
with the Walkman is proof of that
After Walkman's debut in July, 1979,
Sony was not about to bask in the new
product's almost instant success. Within months, Sony audio engineer Kozo
Ohsone was heading a team trying to
come up with a better Walkman. Ohsone carved a block of wood that was
25% smaller than the okiginal design
and gave it to his engineers as a model.
The engineers grumbled, but they
buckled down. By February, 1981,
Sony was shipping thousands of Walkmans that were smaller, sounded betr
ter, and had nearly 50% fewer parts
than Walkman I.
SOUND
Sony continues to dominate the $1.3

billion buslness with a 30% share of
personal tape players sold worldwide.
The reason: "It has been more inventive than the others," says stock analyst Alan BeU of Salomon Brothers
Asia Ltd. Walkman firsts include
Dolby noise reduction in 1982 and a
rechargeable battery in 1986.
Sony's inventiveness shows in more
than technology. To keep Walkman
fresh and to make it appealing to more
customers, Sony churns out new models to suit virtually every taste and
wallet. So far it has introduced about
100. Headed for the beach? Take the
solar-powered, waterproof Walkman.
Tennis, anyone? Here's an ultralight
radio-only model that attaches to a
sweatband. Want concertihall sound?
Slip on the oversize headphones of a
deluxe Boodo Khan. In the U.S.,
where Sony has sold more than 13 mil-
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
O ' E R STORY
lion of the 27 million Walkrnans it has

made, prices run from a plain-vanilla
playback-only model for $32 to a
souped-up $449.95 version that boasts
tapedeckquality sound and records as
well as plays.
Sony has used its image as a technology leader to gain a hammerlock on
the lucrative premium end of the market. Walkman is the only portable ste
reo offered by the tony L. L. Bean mtalog. Emphasizing that it is "made by
Sony in Japan, like 'Mercedes Benz,
made in Germany"' gives Walkman
"intangible added value," says Ohsone,
now audio group director.
p u n n o FOR KEEPS. All Walkman
products are manufactured in Japan.
And despite the soaring yen, Walkman
production is the exception to Sony's
strategy to move more production
overseas. Even though the soaring yen
squeezed profits, Sony says it still
made money on the $432 million worth
of Waikmans it sold last year. One reason: a decision four years ago to create
a low-price model specifically for the
U. S. That forced Sony to automate
production drastically and design a
new model that cut more than 90% off
production costs partly by integrating
the playing mechanism onto the printi
ed circuit board. The basic $32 Walkman has become Sony's bestiselling
model in the U. S.
Analysts think Walkman's go-go
gears are coming to an end. But Sony
disagrees. "Of the 4 billion people in
the world, we estimate we could reach
600 million," says Ohsone. That may be
an overstatement But then, as long as
Sony keeps gripding out new versions,
there seems to be no shortage of people eager to tune in.
Page
Page142
17 of
of111
523
Page 17 of 76
By Amy B
in Tokyo
E5
11 #z
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
BUSINESS WEEKIJUNE 1,1987 68
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
STATISTICS FOR SONY DEAL

1.
Power Station
1% $1 Million in 1987 in Revenues
I. Bon Jovi Tony's creation
a. Format
b. Mixing
Sold 9 million albums in 6 months
2. Power Station Hiah Tech Award Last 4 Years

Best in World By Peers!
3. 4 5 Grammys in 1987 Recorded there Steve Winwood

Others: Jagger,, B. Joel, Springsteen, Diana Ross, Madonna,
J. Lennon, on and on.
4. Tony
- Multi Track Recording
Defied Theory
Designed Sound Voyeger
Produced Star Wars Album Mixed
5. French Lick MTV may sign Free Promotion

II. Technology
1. First Video, film, tv in digital. All first for full entertainment
2. Kodak and Mitsubish Not till end of Decade
3. Dolby Sony/PSDMS
- $10,000 per license to any tv, film, video, etc.
4. Only mix board that will mix albums/video's
Sell to all recording and film studios $300,000
- $500,000 per
console.
5.
Sony spends 9% of gross revenue on R & D

9% of billions 2 = $180,000,000
6. Put Sony 5 years ahead of strategic plan
Disc players Only 23% of consumers currently own a disc player.

First time to hear for how many?
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page143
18 of
of111
523
Page 18 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Filmpideo
1. 23,000 theaters to sell system
2. First will sell movie and video

Add French Lick
3. Top Gun sold 9 million @ $30.00

$270,000,000
- $60.00 per video
4. Horror International Fihn $20 $60,000,000
Pay N,Cable, N ?
IV.
Commercial 180 Sec Commentary
- $8,000,000 for commercial

Visa Demonstration $2 Million - $6 Million
Sony $4,000,000
Pepsi Paid $8,000,000 60 Second in front of "Top Gun" video.
V. Merchandise Private Label

Power Station Beach Line
In movie, free by original designer and owner
- "Hana Ten" swim wear
Power Station Electronics Line/Sony

Best recording in world
- is it good?
Beach Accessories
Promotion in movie, video,
Sell all of above

Video
- Mail Order, Stores
VI. Sony
I. Needs help
a. Low profits
b. Beta Bust
2. Best name electronics Manufacture
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page144
19 of
of111
523
Page 19 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
3. Film and video distribution (new)

4. Willing to work together
a. Share tech
b. Joint venture
c. Horizontal distribution
5. Horror Elements and PIS name already international
Deal would involve:
I. Retail electronics division
2. Professional electronic
3. Film distribution
4. Video distribution
Star Wars $2 Billion in 10 Years from all

revenues
30% 50% = $600,000,000

Tony said 50/50
All costs $4 Million
New Film studio?/with Sony

Deal worth 100,000,000 Now??
Would Kodak or Mitsubish like deal?
Will Sony let this deal go to competition?
No Beta
PERFECT ENDING: Profits and Respect
ereation 4111/87
11:00
'
- 1:00 a.m.
Stan 98%
1% Scott Call Ron Gell

Research Sony
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page145
20 of
of111
523
Page 20 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
1% Marcia Sony give 4 million
Raise 15 Million
Call Head of video distribution
Merchandising Hang Ten Off

Kodak
Sony
Difference test visa add in
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page146
21 of
of111
523
Page 21 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
Technology
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Beyond the Bijou

SOPHISTICATED FILM TECHNOLOGIES
AND FUTURISTIC FORMATS ARE REDEFINING
THE NATURE OF COHTEMPORARY MOVIE THEATERS.
BY JIM PETTIGREW JR.
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page147
22 of
of111
523
Page 22 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
n a world that at times seems defined

by incompatibility, there is one interest which most of us have in common a passion for the movies. And this love
of the cinematic fantasy world shows no
signs of dissipating. Different trends
may appear, such as the VCR explosion,
but upon examining the world of contemporary cinema, one fact becomes
readily apparent - the movies are not
going away. Neither, according to industry leaders, are those esteemed hideouts
of escapism - the theaters.
Though movie theaters are here to
stay, there is a great deal of debate currently going on inside the showcase, or
exhibition end, of the film world. Some
of it concerns topics such as changing
image, and a considerable amount of the
debate relates directly to technology.
The path of events that set the stage for
this situation contains a number of key
elements.
Beginning in the early 1970s. the
movie-theater industry in the U.S.
slowly slipped into what may be called a
technical rut. There were tremendous advances in home-audio technology, but
the exhibition business did not really
keep up.
There was also a trend toward "multiplex" cinema facilities - not an inherently weak mpketing idea - but their
early manifestation didn't prove tenibly
successful. The first multicinemas were
cramped, had very small screens, and
ambient sound many times bled over
from next door.
In the spring of 1977, George Lucas
produced a film that would have a revolutionary. impact on the exhibition industry. It was released to theaters carefully
picked for certain technical standards.
Besides the well-known special effects
and cinematography, Star Wars boasted
a soundtrack in Dolbya stereo. It was
played over an advanced audio system
filled with new designs, including a
"subwoofer" that
-
The film also brought fresh attention

to the large-frame 70mm format. This
expensive but vastly superior process
had been used in earlier landmark
movies (Lawrence of Arabia, Patron)
but had fallen out of favor in Hollywood.
With a new audio standard established
by the Lucas blockbuster, the cinema industry moved into the 1980s - and a
whole, new set of business realities,
coupled with a feverishly expanding

foreground of technological develop
ments.
Clearly, the industry had to adapt and
change. The situation was brought to a
head by the growth of home video, but
that trend was only a part of the whole
arena. Faced with this challenge, the theater industry began what is now a recognizable set of changes to "remainstream"
itself. (The latest studies, incidentally,
show a kind of reverse effect from the
home-movie phenomenon; it's actually
sending patrons back to theaters, seeking
favorite titles in full-blown film environments.)
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page148
23 of
of111
523
Page 23 of 76
Fromthtprojtcbknroomtothcbox
oflke, technology is IntWating
the d m house. Developed by
Douglas Tnrmbull, opposite, Showscan@,
equipped with a c o m w e d motion
control system and 70mm fllm, amazed
audiences at Expos '85 and '86. Above,
computerized ticketing and central-data
systems, like thou dewdoped by Pacer
Coqxxaion, are also coming into
the pkture.
SKY
1987 23
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October
27,
5,May
2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
ALP TWX-INSTALLED SYSTEMS UNDERGO RIGID
GERIIFICRPC6N APCD ARE THEN TESTED EVERY SIX
WBHTHS ao ENSURE QUALITY ADHERENCE.
Zl33 Oak Industrial Dr. N.E.

Grand Rapids, MI 49505
Ton-Free 1-800-253-0882
I'd k e to know more about
Today, the theater repositioning procAccompanied by an advanced audio

ess takes a number of poses, including
design from THX Sound Systems, a
division of Lucasfilm Ltd., an entire film
better s o u n k
_sensible design,
rests on a platter and feeds through a -cleaner halls. a y m overall push to
projector without the projectionisthaving
reenergize the "experience" vital to
to use two ~rdectors.
moviegoing. "Theater companies are
building at record numbers, by the way,"
notes Glenn Berggren, vice president of
of Azusa,
Optical ~adiationCor~oratidn
California, one of the world's largest
suppliers of theater equipment. "They
want to make them better, not only as operations are concerned - breakdowns,
etc. -they'd also like to have an effective
theater that lets the public know they're
modem, better than the ones built five,
ten years ago."
Theaters are now utilizing computerized ticketing and central-data systems, such as those developed by Pacer
Corporation of Bothell, Washington.
The integrated Pacer system instantaneously gathers all sales data for the cashintensive business, compiles it, and the
information is uploaded nightly by automatic modem to central offices. "Our
Tenyberry award jewelry programs.

Our company logo or my business
card is attached. Please send free
sample artwork and a no-obligation
quote on an:
Award Ring Program
EmblemJewelry Program
17 Please call - I have some questions.
Name
Title
Address
CitylStatelZip
Telephone Number
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
24 SKY May 1987
Page
Page149
24 of
of111
523
Page 24 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
system opens up the possibilities of credit-rard and off-site ticket purchasing,"

s Keith Myers, Pacer's marketing
v
president. "This may reach a whole
different segment of affluent consumers
- r-d even influence the kind of movies
tt are made. "
nis trend is well characterized by
numerous showcases across the country.
@
example is the General Cinema
c, plex inside Merchants Walk, a north
4-.mta mall. There, Cinema One features an advanced audio design from
T < Sound Systems, a division of
L asfilm Ltd. in San Rafael, Californla. "Patrons don't really articulate it,"
exvlains theater manager Steve Crisp,
s' ~ i n off
g the loudspeaker system and
lrily insulated walls, "but they know
wnat they want in a film experience
torlay, and sound is verv"-i
6 e healthy sign that experts point to
i: le influence exerted by firms such as
THX Sound Systems and the Theatre
A1;:nment Program (TAP), both compo7 ts of Lucasfilm Ltd. All THX-ins led systems undergo rigid certification and are then tested every six months
tc nsure quality adherence. TAP vigora ly encourages high standards and
d rogue between suppliers and theaters.
"We are targeting theater managers
a personnel with seminaft," says Kim:t ly Strub, marketing director of the
1..:ater Operations division at Lucasfilm. 'These will help them answer quest IS about film presentation - soundt~ :ks, how they're made. Lots of times
p o p l e will have questions about how
films are made, and the only people that
t' y have to turn to are the theater pers ~nel.We're trying to make sure they
are informed and can answer public
ollestions - and also realize how import t their roles are in the film chain."
Zurrently, amid the film exhibitors'
concerted push to modernize, there is an
aP-elerating debate in both the equip
r nt and showcase fields about what
t hnical form the near future will take.
The issues must be set in context within
-rowing array of spectacular new tech1 ogy, film formats, and even new apI laches to the filmic experience.
Two of the central topics now being
(' Sated with increasing fervor in the inAdvanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
'
Page
Page150
25 of
of111
523
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
Page 25 of 76
05.03.2007
SKY May 1987
25
ONE SYSTEM U'PELIZES

7 O M M FILM, A VERY LARGE
SCREEN, A H EXTREMELY
FAST F I L M SPEED AT 60
FRAMES PER SECOFJD, AND
DIGITAL SOUND.
dustry include film speed, expressed in

frames-per-second (fps) and film format
(frame size, coupled with larger
screens). A third topic is the increasing
impact of high-grade video and its eventual manifestation - high-definition television (HDTV) - and how the two industries will affect each other.
For decades, the standard film speed
in the theater industry has been 24 fps. At
this srxed. a relativelv low ~roiectionlight ievel' must be iaintainkd iten-16
foot-candles) to prevent an annoying
sensation called "flicker." There are now
several proponents who are urging that
film speeds be raised, so that higher light
levels may be possible. Faster fps rates,
they point out. also make for richer imagery. better color, and heightened spe-
II
U.S.possibilities
District
Anti-Trust
Court
16-4014
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
cial-effects
- as Litigation
well
as de-CATERBONE
creasing industry headaches such as
"comet-tailing" and blurring.
The 35mm filrn format has also been
the industry standard for decades.
Numerous industry leaders are quick to
point out its obvious obsolescence. The
70mm filrn size, they note, offers much
more than a 100-percent improvement
in cinematographic possibilities. "Most
people, including large film manufacturers, do not really understand how much
detailed information can be put on 70mm
film," asserts Optical Radiation's Berggren, "and shown back on the screen."
A central point. in an overall sense,
that brings these debates into focus is that
there is an already-existing arsenal of
nevlt cinema systems. Each camp points
inarguably to the future, and each system
is now offering spectacular new cinematic exrxriences.
s o h e of the new formats first debuted
Theater at the Museum of Science,
in what the industry calls "specialChicago's OMNIMAX Theater (located
venue" theaters - noncommercial, musein the Henry Crown Space Center at the
um, and other educational halls. CurMuseum of Science and Industry), the
rently the granddaddy of these is the
h
OMNI Theater at the Fort W o ~ MuseIMAX@/OMNIMAX@ system, now
um of Science and History, and the Sciamazing audiences at Washington, D.C.'s
ence Museum of Minnesota in St. Paul Smithsonian, Boston's Mugar OMNI
among others. Several of these "space"
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
26 ADVANCED
SKY May 1987
MEDIA GROUP
Page
Page151
26 of
of111
523
Page 26 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
leaters were designed by the architec~ r a lfirm of Hammel-Green and Abrahamson of Minneapolis, which esti~atedthat 20 million people attended
IMNIMAX theaters around the world in
985.
The heart of the IMAX system is a
nique projection approach; the large-
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Atlanta's independent filmmaker,
format images are projected through a
VanDerKloot Film and Television,
fish-eye lens onto a 76-foot dome, which
extensively utilizes computers and
washes the screen with an enormous pichigh-grade video in current
ture. The screen is tilted toward the audiproduction work.
ence at a 30-degree angle, which creates
a stunning wraparound effect.
Showscan@ is another radically new
film system with breathtaking sensory
experiences. Developed by special-effects wizard Douglas Trumbull (Srar
Even though Showscan is currently
Wars, Star Trek; director of Silent Runconfined to special-venue theaters, the
ning and Brainstorm) Showscan has
corporation clearly has plans to move
amazed audiences at Expos '85 and '86;
into the box-office market. "We don't
the Vancouver theater in Canada rehave an announcement yet, but we're
mained open after the fair, and 50,000
very close," says marketing director
people saw the Showscan presentation in
Cindy Porter. "We're confident that
January of this year. The corporation is
when an announcement is made, a feacurrently opening special-venue theaters
ture film will be out within two years."
in Los Angeles and several other cities in
Currently, the leader in the race to
the U. S., Australia, and New Zealand.
bring stunning new technology into the
Showscan utilizes 70mm film, a very
first-mn film market is FuturVision
large screen. an extremely fast film
3*,
a division of FuturCinema Inc. in
s g e d at 60 fbs, and digital sound. While
New York. The brainchild of former
developing the process, Tmmbull ran
Kodak executive Eric Knutsen, this procextensive tests at various film speeds,
ess utilizes large-screen (wall-to-wall,
utilizing participants at California unifloor-to-ceiling) 70mm, a sophisticated
versities. For several years in the 1970s,
digital audio system, and runs at 30 fps.
Tmmbull was also head of Future GenFor several months, Knutsen and
eral, an experimental department at
FuturVision have had ties with Loews, a
Paramount Studios.
HOW TO PURCHASE ONE OF EUROPE'S

A thousand years of myth and history await you with$ a day's drive
from Stuttgart-in any one of the
most technologically advanced
automobiles ever to come from
Mercedes-Benz. Choose from
among fourteen models.* And
embark on the driving odyssey of
your life. Traveling the Continent
at your leisure, saving money en
route-on trains, taxis, and rental
car costs. See your authorized
dealer. Then see the sights of
Europe-and bring one of them
home. Send coupon at right for
our free color brochure.
'subject to availability
'
Send coupon to:

Mercedes-Benzof
~ o r t ~merica.
h
~nc.,
Marketing Communications
I Division,
lne Mercedes Drive,
II
I
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie Page
Page152
27 of
of111
523
Page 27 of 76
Name
A d k
city
Zip
8 1987 Mercedes-Benz of N A , Inc.. Montvale. NJ
DSMY 87
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October
27,
5,
2016
05.03.2007
SKY
May 1987 27
a BIG
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
Court
16-4014
CATERBONE
v. Lancaster
City
v. United
Police
Department
et.al.,
SELLING
PQIHT
TOLitigation
FIRST-RUN
THEATERS
IS States,
&OMPARATIWE EASE OF COMPATIBILITY AND
COST-EFFECPIVEPBESS.
Architectural
Antique Auction
Saturday & Sunday
Starts 10:00a.m.
The lW@
system is a unique projection
approach where large format images are
projected t h ~ aafish*
kns 0a 76-foot dome.
Rare Uk Size Grecian Bronze
Over 1200 Unique I t e m s

will be sold
Several of the best handcarved

panelled roomspailable
Bronzewalls & formal enbyways
Carved wood embellishments
Chandeliers
Magnificent mantels
Saloon & home back bars
Marble statuary
As Always No Minimum No R e s e n e
ComplimentaryM e t and Drinks

For lrnrnedlate 1nformatIon
or Brochure
(Reader Survey Cards Delay Process)
call or write
5070 Peachtree Industrial Blvd.

Atlanta, aA 30341
(404)457-1905
major theater chain (his system is now

being showcased at Loews Tower East,
a prestigious Manhattan screening
room). At presstime, Knutsen was preparing to announce an agreement with a
second major chain.
Besides its audiolvisual sorcery, one
of FuturVision's big selling points to
first-run theaters is comparative ease of
compatibility and cost-effectiveness.
Working with Optical Radiation Corp.,
Knutsen has developed his system so that
it can be integrated into existing theater
hardware - and still offer the dazzling
filmic experiences that all aggressive
chains are now scrutinizing.
One aspect of FuturVision is digital
audio, said to be comparable to CD q ality (actual CDImovie presentations
+stillin the future). With this
daudio is taken from the
film and fed to a Knutsendesigned processor, which then sends audio signals to
an upgraded house system.
"Now," Knutsen says, "the projectionist can walk into the booth and
flip two switches. One automatically
changes screen brightness from low level
to a much higher level for our film, and
at the same time changes film speed from
24 to 30. The second switch automati-
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
MEDIA GROUP
28 ADVANCED
SKY May 1987
Page
Page153
28 of
of111
523
Page 28 of 76
I'
cally bypasses house audio and goes to

our processing equipment. So, there's
virtually no set-up time."
until recently, the film-production
community and the exhibitorltheater
equipment industries have viewed each
other as barely tolerable neighbors,
forced to get along, but with little meaningful dialogue between the two camps.
Now, though, in the face of this starburst
of new technology, the two industries are
working together, insiders point out, to
achieve the common goal of a truly
realistic cinematic experience, and the
subsequent fiscal rewards.
Bill VanDerKloot, owner of VanDerKloot Film and Television in Atlanta,
one of the premier independent filmmakers in the south, has a keen eye on these
and other developments. His firm extensively utilizes computers and high-grade
video in current production work.
"Today," he points out, "stereo soundtracks are mandatory, even for lowbudget films, not the case just ten years
ago. People have become very sophisticated in their technical tastes for film.
"I am just incredibly excited about
what the future has to offer," VanDerKloot concludes. "The more like reality
we can make the dreams that we create
on film, the more fascinating and fantastic films will be."
Contributing editor Jim Pettigrew Jr.
is based in Atlanta, Georgia.Q
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Management Group, LTD

w
m w m p w
Oregon Pike
Lancaster, PA 17601
717-569-5555
Table O f Contents
Section I
~inancialManagement
Section I1
The Project
Section I11
Distribution and Structure
Group
Section IV
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page154
29 of
of111
523
Page 29 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Power Station w a s formed in 1977, in partnership w i t h Tony Bongiovi and

Bob W a l t e r s . Pcrwer Station, within a short period of time established
i t s e l f as the premiere reconhg f a c i l i t y i n the world. The studios
success t o a larye degree is due to Bongiovils tmmerdous creative talents
in the fields of studio design, prduction and en.-t
The a b i l i t y
t o anticipate what the public a t larye wants to hear and to create a
a highly marketable product.
format that will p&ce
Bongiwils creative genius became most evident with his recent success
producing t h e band *IBonJoviu, A f 3 x years of work dweloping t h e i r
t a l e n t and structuring the format f o r their music, ItE3on Jwit*rapidly
became one of top bands in the world.
-\
\.-
Bongiwils most recent project is a bard called I1French LiW, which he

brought into the studio approximately two years ago. You may have heard
French Lick's music in Ron Hawardls p-ction
of Gung-Ho. French Lick's
music and t a l e n t have been developed alo~lgthe s a m e format as "Ban Joviu
and have recmtly been s
h
e to the major r
e
c
o
m labels.
Contracts should be finalized w i t h QuantumMedium in a few weeks.
Quantum M e d i u m is a division of MCA, owned by the same people t h a t own
EWV. Fren& Lick is wholly owned by Power Station, along with t h e i r f i r s t
album, which gives Bongiwi t h e a b i l i t y to use any and all the songs from
the album in the mwie.
By placing the bard in t h e movie and having the music score written by the
band, w e are able t o take advantage of marbting potential mnnally not
available ta other prductions. The music video f o r the band w i l l be shot
a t thedtime as the mavie an3 w i l l primarily be scenes from the
movie. 'Ihe release of the video w i l l be +.inwl to pramate the opening of
the movie. ?he release of the songs off the first album w i l l also be
coordinated to pramate the mwie. W fully urdershnd t h e marketing
potential the band brings to the project, picture what gross receipts a t
the box office would look like i f I*BonJoviI1 were appearing in a movie
this year (Any movie) If F'rench Lick does one tenth as w e l l as Bon Jwi,
this mwie is a -teed
hit.
During Bongiwi ' s work on " S t a r W a r s 1 * , **ApocalypseNaw" and llGung-holl, he

w a s able t o rclake many of the contacts necessary to form t h e extremely
talented group of artists that are essential f o r a production t o be
successful.
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page155
30 of
of111
523
Page 30 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
peters: ~irector/Writer/Prducer
has directed many programs such as t W a t t Houston", "Falcon
C r e s t t t, tfGigneyand L
a
w
, tWisfitsw, ~tBerrengersn,and tlRemington
t h a t convinced Tony t o
SteeleN t o name a few. The film Ehrbara dire&&
hire her for this pxduction w a s tWunmoids Frow The Deeptt. Humanoids was
made i n 1978 for $ 980,000 ($ 20,000 d e r budget and four days ahead of
and foreign theatrical
schedule) and grossed aver $28 million in d-ic
Sales. Tixis w a s during a period in time when the video market w a s in its
early stages of d e v e l w t . A film released today t h a t would gross $ 28
million in 1978 dollars has even greater potential for a much higher gross
with the strong video market that is available naw. What impressed Tony
the
w i t h Baxbaratsdjrection of Humnoids w a s her a b i l i t y to bring a
high degree of quality to a film on such a l i m i t e d W g e t .
Peter Hock: Stunt ~ ~ t o r / A c t o r / s & m h m
Peter8s d t s include films such as, Trading Placestt, gtStepford
Bustersw, "FX', and a host of other Films,
Wives", 'To K i l l A Capw, "Ql&
Broadway, - i d s
p,
L
ard Telwision S h c m .
There are many factors which contribute to a projects success. I f you

w e r e t o take a m c s section of the movie h3ustry t o find which types of
projects w e r e most likely to s u m , yau wauld find that movies in the
two t o four million dollar range have much greater chances of success than
movies in the t a t o f i f t e e n million dollar range. The reasons f o r t h i s
are qui,. simple. A movie in the two t o four million dollar range is a
high enough budget to pmduce a quality film h x t limiting the r i s k t o the
investor since it needs less of the market share to p&ce
a profit.
Horror mwies, frran the investors point of view are the safest type of
movie to finance. H o r r o r mies have an almsst cultist fo1lmi.q.
The
type of audience that attenl homr mies rarely w a i t to see what the
critics have t o say about the movie. mere is a fascination w i t h gore
t h a t this audience would rather see than have described t o them. The
overseas market f o r movies of this genre are tremendous. In almost a l l
cases the gross revenues fram the theatre, w i l l be greater overseas than
in the damestic (US and Canada) market. ?his especially holds t r u e f o r
horror movies.
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page156
31 of
of111
523
Page 31 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
O v e r the last few years, w e have h e n seeing a trend for movies t o have a
much heavier music score than in the past. The feelings that can be
invoked in an audience from audio are sometimes as great o r greater than
the visual aspects of a film. W i t h Bongiovi's experience and past track
record, w e are assured of having one of the best quality sound tracks t o a
movie ever M e . 'Ibis production could very well revolutionize t h e movie
inctustry i n t h a t this will be the first time that the sound track w i l l be
t o t a l l y digitized fram the set to the theatre o r home video. What this
means is that t h e quality of the sound, which is typically extremely poor
in a m v i e theatre o r hone video cassette, w i l l now be tremendously
crisp. T h i s new m i e sourd will be similar t o the quality you would
aqect froan a laser disc. Normally the costs involved t o produce a m i e
wit31 this type of s a n d track would greatly increase the budget to a point
where the project would have an increased element of risk. With Power
Station, w h i c h W d y has in place state of the art equipnmt, some of
w h i c h can be found in only one o r two other studios in the world, this
sourrd track can be produced f o r a fraction of the costs that another
produckion ccanpany would have to pay. l h i s greatly reduces the r i s k t o
the investor to be able t o prcduce state of the art audio at a fraction of
the costs.
It is a very natural progression f o r a recording studio such as mer

Station to evolve into an e n t e r b b m m t cmplex w h i c h includes the
production of films. Pcrwer Station currently has financing in place f o r a
$ 3.5 million video mix studio t o be fsuilt next t o the recon3i.q studio.
D i s - t r i l p t i o n companies are constantly looking for new sources of product
to market. With Bongiovils track record in the entertairrment industry,
any p&ct
that mies t h e Bongiovi label should create a bidding
silxntion w i t h t h e distributors.
Advanced plblic relations w o r k is currently being done t o set the s t a g e
for negotiations with t h e distribution campanies. l l B i l l h a r d l t , 'VarieWt1,
and "Box Officetqhave W d y agreed t o do a r t i c l e s on Bongiovi and t h e
nmvie. On April 30, ABC w i l l be airing a radio talk show w i t h Boriyiari
that w i l l air on 2300 stations to a total listening audience of over six
million people. "Fame, Fortune, and Romance" have also agreed t o give
network T V coverage.
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page157
32 of
of111
523
Page 32 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
The home video market has rapidly been changing the potential mwie
profits for the industry. A Nighbare On Elm Street w a s made for w e l l
under two million dollars and has earned New Line Cinema more than $24
million a t the domestic box office. I n addition, a f t e r a short video
release, this production has sold over 3 million cassettes. In the past
videos w e r e sold only t o video'rental stores for approximately $70
apiece. Recently the price has been lmered t o expand the market t o the
general public. The video rental stores won't disappear, but they may
became more like record stores that also rent their albums. A l l of this
translates into more profit potential for prcducer and investor.
It is an extremely rare opportunity t o be able to get in on the ground
floor in an offshoot of an already well established entertainment
company. Any investor willing to back this project w i l l have f i r s t right
of refusal on any future projects. ?he pe.rcentages w i l l remain the same
for a t least the first two projects.
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page158
33 of
of111
523
Page 33 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Independently prduced motion pictures are a better investment today
than ever before.
1) Increased Markets: There is much wider distribution of motion

pictures today than ever before (i.e. Pay Tv, Cable TV,
videoassettes, satellite tmnsmissions, etc. )
'Presale' contracts which bind the buyers (i.e. networks, pay Tv,
foreign distributors, etc.) t o specific payments a t a future date,
this insuring return of capital and, in sane cases, a p r o f i t before
t h e film is released.
2.
Investment structure:
The producer and investor form a limited partnership for the purposes
of prottucing one or more motion pictures. The investor receives 100%

of the net p r o f i t s until remupent, after w h i c h the s p l i t is 50-50.
Profit participation of o ~ e s s(actors, director, writer, etc. ) canes
out of t h e p&cerls
end.
The pq3uce.r secures t h e services of a director, principal actors,
and a w r i t e r .
Presale Deals:
The producer can negotiate presale (preproduction) arrangements with
distributors, networks, pay TV, merchandisers, etc. Whereas such
ar~angementscan minimize the downside risk, they can also inhibit
the eventual profitability of the film.

Risk Factors:
It is very difficult to determine exactly how much of a r i s k one runs

in financing a theatrical film. Adequate s t a t i s t i c s are hpssible
t o find. Shannat Services of Los Angeles a four-year-old study w h i c h
revealed that 60% of all f
b released make money. This study,
however, did not include long range TV syndication (foreign and
domestic) revenues, and w a s made before Pay TV and video cassettes

Chemical Bank of New York
reports that they have never lost mney on film financing.
became significant additional markets.

r
' \.
-.
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page159
34 of
of111
523
Page 34 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Another r i s k is the possibility that no distributor w i l l want t o

release the picture. That is why some independent producers include
a provision for distribution financing in their investment
agreemmts. I f worse comes t o worst, producers can distribute t h e
film themselves. (Notable examples are ''Billy Jacktt and ttBenjit'.)
There may be production catastrophes that w i l l delay o r cancel
Producers w i l l carry various forms
pmduction o n e it is under
of insuranoe (including completion bonds) t o a t least repay whatever

funds have already been spent.
If a distribution amaqement has not already been made, the producer
now secures such an arrangement. I f the picture is goad, it is

possible to negotiate a much better deal than could have been done
earlier. On the other hand, the producer could have truuble securing
the kind of distribution commitment wanted. The main factors here
are hcw much money the distributor is willing to c o m m i t to s e l l i n g
the picture, h m much influence the producer can have on the
m r l e t i q ~ m p a i g n ,and the distribution fee. Sanetimes smll
distributors are able t o give more time and attention t o indeperdent
pictures and offer better terms, but the producer may have to provi.de
same - W o n
expexes.
of gmss domestic box office receipts, the exhibitor (retailer)
usually subtracts his fixed costs and then receives 10%. Cut of t h e
ranainjng 90% gmss film rentals received by the distributor
(wholesaler), he usually recoups all or part of his costs plus a
distribution fee of 20-35%, then passes the rest on t o the
producer/hwestor. Terms of distribution deals vary considerably.
Cut
Ebx office reoeipts, however, only account for a part of the

producer/investorls revenues. A s the enclosed figures show, t h e
ancillary markets are a t least as significant as the daoestic theatre
box office. T V syndication, for instance, can continue t o bring in
revenues f o r the next twenty years.
Demand for P r d ~ c t :
TWayts supply comes nowhere near to mtching real demand. A t the

present time, there are over 18,000 theatres i n the United S t a t e s .
It can readily be seen t h a t roughly 400 films produced and rated l a s t
year did not w i n t o m e e t t h e i r needs. Theatres are canpelled t o
show any type of film they can obtain to keep t h e i r doors open.
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie Page
Page160
35 of
of111
523
Page 35 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
To date, independent producers are responsible for 72% of a l l films

mde world-wide. The domestic figure is 62%. The independent
producer has three primary options -r
distribution. These
include the sale of the film outright to a major national
distributor, t h e i r merchandising of the film by the production
who
company i t s e l f , o r the use of smaller regional sub-distsibuto~~
m y promote the film in their respective geographical areas.
Distribution of films often relies on a l l three methods t o one degree
or another.
Another market, television, can consume nearly every film that has
been, o r is presently being produced. If each of the three networks
would show only one film per night, they would need over 1,000 f i l m s
per year. In ks Angeles area alone, there are nearly 10,000 f i l n ~ ~
aired each year in a ambination of local and network viewing time.
Many f i l m s are shown time and time again because there are no new
fibs to replace them.
Today, virtually every film of quality has residual value in
television, either by outright sale o r by t e n n licensing. Tke latter
is preferable since it a l l = the production company to retain
' p of the negative. The t i m e lag between theatre release and
~hasdimini~edfromsev~yearstoanaverageof18mnths.
Hwever, scnne major features such as ffTheWizft have been sold to TV
before completing a full year in theatrical release. The trend seems
to be toward prchase of 'freshf films, and the outlets appear
willing to pay the higher costs involved
I
Because of the great demand and the outrageously ccanpetitive a t t i t u d e

that pemades the networks, handsame deals are being consummated
before the production has been q l e t e d and then, by p-ement
w i t h the producers, hold the film u n t i l it has completed its
theatrical run.
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page161
36 of
of111
523
Page 36 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page162
37 of
of111
523
Page 37 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Breakeven for Limited Parhers:
Based on gross revenues of $ 11,200,000 collected fm 1st and 2nd

theatrical runs
1st run ticket costs of $ 6.00
2nd run ticket
costs of $
5.00
1st Run
50 people per shed
x $ 6.00
$ 300.00 G r o s s per show
$ 300.00 per shaw X 1000 houses
$ 300,000 G r o s s
$ 300,000 X 14 days
$ 4,200,000 G r o s s
$ 250.00 G r o s s per show
$ 250.00 per shod X 2000 houses
$ 500,000 G r o s s
$ 500,000 X 14 days
$ 7,000,000 G r o s s
2nd Run
50 pea~leper show
X $ 5.00
TotalIstm
Total 2nd Run
Total
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page163
38 of
of111
523
Page 38 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Forcast A
Total Box Office G r o s s

Less 15%For Theatres
-----
--
Motion Picture P r o f i t s
Less 30% Distribution Fee
L e s s : Investors Capital
N e t Profit
-$
---------
----
Producers Split @ 50%
--
Invesbmt Company R e t u m
Less : General Partners Split @ 15%
Investors Return
11,200,000
1,680,000
9,520,000
2,856,000
6,664,000
4,000.000
2,664,000
1,332,000
1,332,000
199,800
1,132,200
T h e s e are only proiections and are for informational ~ u p o s e sonly. Any

investment made, based s o l e l y on these proiections would be unadvisable as
actual P e r f o m c e could varv m e a t l y .
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page164
39 of
of111
523
Page 39 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Forecast B
Forecast B is based on a total box office gross of $ 28 million
A film that produces a theatrical gmss of $ 28 million can be expect& to
gross at least that much from W ,Cable and video markets. Depending on how
distribution agreements are negotiated we can expect 50% to be net profits.
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie Page
Page165
40 of
of111
523
Page 40 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Forecast B
-----------
Total Box O f f i c e Gross

B s 15% For Theatres
$ 28,000,000
--------I----
Motion Picture P r o f i t s ----TpCC 30%
4,200,000
$ 23,800,000
Distribution Fee
7,140,000
$ 16,660,000
T.V.,
Cable and V i d e o N e t --------
$ 14,000,000
Total N e t -------TpCC :
$ 25.340.000
Investors Capital
N e t Profit
----------
4,000,000
$ 21,340,000
m c e x s S p l i t @ 50%
$ lo., 670,000
Invesbent Companiest Return
$ 10,670,000
L e s s :,General Partners S p l i t @ 15%
1,600,500
Investors Return
9,069,500
These are only proiections and are f o r informational txlnxses only. An

invesmt made, based solely on these ~ m i e c t i o n swould be unadvisable as
actual p e r f o m c e could v a r ~sreatly.
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie Page
Page166
41 of
of111
523
Page 41 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
You Oughta Be In
Pictures!
1
I
by Alan Talansky
here's esplosive growth occurring in the motion picture industry, and growth should always be
music to any investor's ears. "But
movies?" YOU say? It's time to put
aside your images of Tinschonrn and
"Heaven's Gate," and to take another
look at an industry with some new,
sound investment potential.
There's risk in any investment, of
course, even in real estate - the investment area on which many firms
originally buiit their reputation and
success. In real estate, it's a matter of
how carefully you assess a variery of
influential factors and how you structure the deal. Motion pictures are
much the same. You've got to look
'
;
j
:I I
fashioned profit: an ideal solution for

post tax-reform era.
The key here is understsnding how
nluch the industry has chsnged. The
tyranny and fickleness of box-office
receipts is no longer. More people
around the world are viewing more
films than ever before, but not necessarily in the theatres. Consider, for
example, that there are only about 300
feature films made every year, of
which about half could be considered
-major.- NOW, compare that with the
number of movies a cable outlet, like
Home Box Office,
shows in a single
day. Eight? Then,
take a look at the
shelves of ytwr l t x ~ l
3.
ucts to be financed, and the second is

the structuring of the deal.
1, selecting the product, success is
usually found in
~ 1 ,
larger the budget in a film, the grcatcr
the fink.
the $50 ,-,,illion
pdted blockbusters and seek out. instead, the more modest undenakings
smaller, ambitious film production sources. A,, excellent exan,ple
is
Island Picture-, a relatively
independent film production and distribution company for which, last
Not quite a blockbustec lslund's "Nobodv's Fool. " s t a r r i t ~ ~

Karannu Arquellr und Eric Roberts, wus a more morlrrute success.
e m with Pulitzer Prize winrringpIrrywnght tkfh Henley wri~ing.Photo
courtesy I S MPictures.
I
ll
:I
I
Success on a shoestring: Producer/director Spike Lee (center) turned

a paltry $ 175,000 procluctiun bltdget for "She's Gt~ttuHum It' itklo u
$7 milliotr grcw.itr(:suprise hit. Co-stun-jolrn Cutrurlu Terndl (left) cord
Redmotrl H i c k (n(:/rt, wiill i r e utz tire w t PMto courtesy Forty k e s
and a Mule Filmworks.
When the motion picture industry

was first examined as an investment
, vehicle a few years ago, the expecta1 tion was that there was potential for
tax deferment. What was found, however, was a surprisingly rich source of
income for investors from good, old-
video rental store,

and the crowds
looking them overt
and you begin to
understand the dimensions of growth.
Of course, just as not every piece of
real estate is a great investment, every
movie isn't bound t o turn a p-ofi;.
But, there are two factors that have
proven to be the critical difference in
creating a sound investment vehicle.
The first is the selection of the prod-
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page167
42 of
of111
523
Page 42 of 76
year, a $7.4 million equity placement

was arranged. Island Pictures is an rfficient operation - unlike some of
the more notorious larger Hollywood
studios - a n d it knows how to
recognize quality.
Little known Island Pictures captured a great deal of attention in 1985
with two extraordinary films - "Kiss
of the Spider Woman" and "Trip to
Bountiful." It was the first time in history that o n e production house could
claim credit for both the Best Actor
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
The information set forth herein w a s obtained fnan sources w h i c h w e

believe reliable, but w e do not guarantee its accuracy. N e i t h e r t h e
information nor any opinion apressed constitutes a solicitation by us of
the purchase o r sale of any securities or cammodities. 'Ibis package is
f o r informational purposes only, t o gain an indication of interest in t h i s
project. Financial Management Group Ltd. does not endorsed and has not
been contracted by Wer Station t o promote this project. Any questions
regardug information contained herein should be direckd t o Stanley J.
Caterbone o r Scott Robertson.
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page168
43 of
of111
523
Page 43 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page169
44 of
of111
523
Page 44 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
I.
w
t
y Financing with LimitedD-
a.
b.
c.
d.
UnlimitedMmrberof Investors
Small units of $5,000 to $25,000 per unit
Share 50%of profits w i t h Limited Partners
Time constraints as follows:
1. 90 day for regulatory appto s o l i c i t securities
2.
30
60 days to raise 2 - 4 million
11.
Equity Financing w i t h General Partners
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
Smallnumberof investors
No time constraints t o raise funds
Large u n i t s $1 to $4 million units
Share 50%of profits w i t h General Partners
Very difficult because of the poor economic reputation of film
b3ustry w i t h r q x d s to investors.
111. Debt Financing with General Partners
a.
b.
IV.
F're Sell Distr-ion
a.
v.
above
Costs are 50%interest per year: For every $1 million, it w i l l cost
a t least $500,000 in guaranteed interest payments.
Sam= as
Contracts
b.
W of m t i v e Control
Share 60% to 80% of profits w i t h Distribution Ccarpany
c.
d.
upside potential
L i t t l e damside risk
DebtwithLineof Credit
a.
b.
c.
d.
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Need collateral redL estate, inventory or accounts receivables

Very cheap 8% - 11%
per year for i n t e r s t
N o t h constraints
No loss of creative control
Page
Page170
45 of
of111
523
Page 45 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
ANALYSIS
The follawing Analysis shows how the different forms of financing

conpare to one another under the most important variables to us:
1. Creative Control
2. Time parameters
3. Costs
I used three economic sceneries as to the net results of the
project:
1. A
of 1 Million Dollars
2. A Profit of 15 Million Dollars
3. A Profit of 100 Million Dollars
Alternatives
Time
Creative
Corrtrol
Cost
Of
Financing
LDss Of
1.1 Equity
90-180
Days
Same
mss
50% of
Profits
No lhss
$7.5 M
$50 M.
with Limited
II*)Equity
with General
30-180
MOZ
$7.!34
$50 M
Loss
50% of
Profits
No bss
Days
111. ) Debt with
30-180
50%-100%
Interest
$3.0 M
$3.0 M
Days
S ~ T E
Less
No Lr>ss
Generals
$10.5M
$70 M
Profit
$1 Million of $15M
Profit Of
of $100M
m e s
N.) Pre Sell

Distribution
Days
V. ) Line of
Credit
mYs
30-180
- 30
60%-80%
NO LOSS
of Profits
None
Inst
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
8%-11%
Interest
Payments
Page
Page171
46 of
of111
523
Page 46 of 76
Refinance
$440,000
or
with 30 year less
note with
$9523/Mo.
payment @11%
Wlilding
$440,000
or
less
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
1.
Story
2.
Treatment
35,000
3.
Director
50,000
4.
5.
ArleneandEhrbara, N.Y.
6.
Finance Costs
5,000
110,000
50,000
200.000
$ 450,000
Line of Credit
$ 250,000
Stan's Investor
250,000
The above gives us 60 days to receive funds froan Sony and Visa for the spot in
the beginning of the video.
n-Lis gives us a chance to get money without using the line of credit.
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page172
47 of
of111
523
Page 47 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
IIAY
THE MI-ITANT FRO.-IEC:T
27, 1 i/:37
__--____--_________-------------------------------------TOTALS
_-_---_-_-_--__-_---------------------------------------;
STORY
O
C:SINT I NU ITY AND TFi'EATMENT
F'ROKIUCEK
o
D 1RECTOR
3+
OAST
BITS
EXTRAS AND STAND-INS
II
5;0(:10.00:
3.1(75(:1(:](:I :
1 15054. 00 :
2250(2(11.
(I): :
38&,,212.
(10:
521.00:
122253. C)O :
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
----------------,-----------------------#---------------'
TOTAL ABOVE THE L I N E
a
8E8&.YCl.00 1
I
----------------------------------------a---------------;
I
I
I
I
PRODUCTION STAFF S A L A R I E S
PRCfDtlC:TI ON OPERAT I
NG STAFF
SET D E S I G N I N G
SET OPERATING EXPENSES
LOCAT I ON
TESTS AND RETAKES
CUTTING/FILM/LAEORATORY
MClS 1 C
SI~I-IND _
PLIEL I C I T Y
MISCELLANEOUS
INSURANCE/TAXES/LICENSE5; k FEES
GENERAL OVERHEAD
I
I
I
8
I
I
I
I
8I
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
I
I
8I
I
1
I
I
I
1Y255S. 00 :
58295&..001
Z051cS5.00:
26t5.858.C)O 1
543:395.00:
20750.OC) :
-3~-4244.
.-.
(:)(I
:
161409.00:
184359.00:
1
19121.00:
31 1381.00:
3580(1.C)(] :
I
1
I
-----------------------------------------;---------------t
TOTAL BELOW THE L I N E
2c5c,516.00 :
1
I
37472(1)&.00 :
1I
&*46750.00:
4393956.C)C)1
----------------------------------------;---------------t
----------------------------------------;---------------t
TOTAL ABOVE b FELQW THE L I N E
----------------------------------------;---------;=----:
----------------------------------------1---------------;
TOTAL F I N A N C E CHGS/CClNTINGENCY /BONDS

----------------------------------------;---------------t
GRAND TCfTCIL
........................................
tlOES NOT INCLUDE c:2"'' f ::r>ENIY
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
--f-------
Page
Page173
48 of
of111
523
Page 48 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
F'AGE 1
STORY:
I [lAYS/WEEt::S
RATE
TClTAL
'------------I---------------;-------------.
4.
P.
C:.
STiIIKY F'l-lRC:HASE
T I T L E PI-1HC:HASE
M1SCELLANEiII-1::; EXPENSE
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
aI
5(:)0<).()0
1 5<100.
00
: U
: O
I
I
-----------------------------------I------------l---------------;--------------
TlIlTAL STORY:
-----------------------------------'----'------------:---------------;-------------Cl3NT INU ITY AND TREATMENT:

A.
B.
EB.
C.
I?.
E.
50(:,C).
00
aI
WR ITERS
SECRETARIES AND T Y P I S T S
PAYROLL TAXES - B (15.8%)
XEROX EXPENSE
RESEARCIH EXPENSE
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE
30000.00
: 3000O.O~)
: O
: O
: 3000.00
: 1650.00
8
I
1
I
a1
8I
1 .IS
I
I
aI
8I
8I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
200.00
----------------------------'------------;---------------a-------------.
TOTAL C O N T I N U I T Y AND TREATMENT:

?
-----------------------------------'------------;---------------;------------PHODIJCER :
I
a
I
I
&7em~G
A.
B.
BE.
C.
C:C.
D.
S ROEINSON/S
I
I
aI
I
I
I
I
I
I
ta
I
I
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
I
I
aI
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ASSOCIATES (ARLENE)
BARBARA PEETEKS (DEFERRED)
SECRETARIES
PAYROLL TAXES - C: ( 1 5 . 8 % )
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE
100000.00
o
I
26
aI
I
I
3465(1).(](I
500.00
0
0
10~l000.00
0
13000.00
2054.00
0
-----------------------------------~------------~---------------~-------------.
TOTAL PRC1DUC:ER :
115c)54.00
-----------------------------------;------------;---------------t-------------
D I REC:TilR:
11
IRECTOR
B. SECRETARIES
EB. PAYROLL TAX - P ( 15.8%)
C.
HEALTH b WELFARE/PENSION
D. MISCELLANEOCIS EXPENSE
A.
12.5%
I
I
8I
8
1
200000. 00
-1I
20006C). 00
:
:
:
I
I
1
a
I
I
I
I
I
I
: 5
: 34
: 15
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
0
25(]0(].()(]
i)
-----------------------------------;------------1---------------;-------------
TOTAL D IRECTIIIR
225~1(:1(:).0(:)
-----------------------------------'------------;---------------1-------------
cAST :
C:OL HEMSLEY ( P / D Y
RICK (P/DY)
.-IERKY ( P / t l Y )
VTC (rn./r~
5 T h N ( F/ tfY)
~)
t::ATIE ( P / D Y )
GARREN ( F ' / D Y )
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
--IRCt:'
( PMedia
/ D Y ) Group
.-, ,
A%s
:
:
zk,
11
7
Page
Page174
of111
523
:495of
Page 49 of 76
10c)0.(1(:)
: 5000.
1000.00
: 34(:)c)(].00
1000.00
: 15000. (30
I (1)0 (1) (3(11
: 2:30(:)0.(:I(:!
~C)Q(:I.~I~
: 2k.0i10.i~c)
1(1)(1)<I (1)(11
: 1100(1) (1)(1)
523.00
: 3675. 0~:)
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October
27,
5, 2016
1 525. (:I(:)
: 2(;25.(:)(1)
.
---
-.-.
.-.,-.
05.03.2007
?.F
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
MATTHEW AP'A MR X ( F ' / D Y )
5 T H BOND MEMBER ( P / D Y )
LII~II:: t::LEIN ( F / t l Y )
BARNEY ( P / D Y )
.-IE:I-;;SIE ( P / D Y )
r::ORRI E ( P/DY
ELID ( P / D Y )
1::HARLIE ( P / D Y 1
ANNIE ( F / D Y )
I:rl'i L!-lN!:iRIN ( F ' / D Y )
lz*;4t.l (P/L!Y)
!:.Ers!+!'<<f:8i[!y;
I:.; lt.~I:~l: r.., i ( ,ras-tx TI.,-\r-I 1' \
,-!v,,,l::El:; i
.-.- i i .*,:.-1;.
:-Ir: '..' ,.
~.:;I>LLE[.~
(:(.{&*:.,'rEFi
- - .plat.; ( t : - l i CI r\ r-iA\,' )
J.
- . . , - . - I :
kAJ/
,.-.,-,-8--l,
EL!'{
.-- .,
,-,L
z.;%;l-k:!~:;;:=;c !:.;-F,;
p!9 . ' .
':;:C:>!'yt:'".'
r.-..
llti
[,!;q.f
"
(FfjJ< Llf;y')
.,' p-lr.; (i:.Er.*
,-, i-!{-,.,'
LI, 3 -a
.
;)E;
.
',/ .
L..'l..-c
..LI
( pk-!.L
\n :. \
:!
i.!{:,',':
;; L.12
"2
7
A
;;;i\.;:;
:f;'?'AFF WC!MAf;!
,:
:I#
':' ?
.
.. .:.. ,-"
\
;-'Z:f:
L
'""
L.*.,i? :
i:A\,' ',
.. ,-." ,I-.... .,- (. !.,L::,L!t.%,%!

.:.,-<l-,.t,
j
Li;.,<; ;-: 1r,i i-,
1 ,L 2: ;:..;I.,.-. . >:&!''\ j
...-? ( FEE c!A'y )
.i
\.
!1: 1.;
&
. , ... id:;=* ::- ( p k.l< LlG .i
ELE?,(zHc[l BF; 1x:!; 1 ; C:*FIf;: LI;?~','
ELEACHEtr E R A 1: r.]:
2 ( PElI; C-IA';' )
BLEF;IZHEU SK;iIN:S 3 ( P E R trAY)
FLERC:HED F R 6 I N S L! (PEK tlHY )
Cl:fA!sT
Gl-lARD (PER DAY )
F R I L L Y G I R L (PER DAY)
MRS. QUEEN ( PER ! DAY 1
HANDSOME TEENAGER ( F'ER EIAY )
G I A N T ULTRIMA GUARD ( PER DAY
CRlJDE BOY'S ISATE ( PER DAY )
CORPSE OFFICER 1 ( PER DAY
BARRICADE C:OP 1 (PER D A Y )
MUTANT S I T E CIIP ( PER DAY )
t::ERR '5 S 1DEK 1C:F:: C:IIIF' ( PER DAY )
:
tk:-
.-
P..
&..
-.
?,
,-'
' :%
HEALTH k WELFfiRE (11%)

FAYROLL TAXES (15.8%)
OVERTIME CAST ( 5 % )
STI-lNTS :
Bl3QT DRIVER
11
IVER
CHARLIE I N TANK
G I R L PULLED FR R I D E
BOY PULLED F R H I D E
CREEP PULLED FR R I D E
C H A R L I E & BARNEY F I G H T
STAN FEATS COL H
HEALTH & WELFARE/F'ENSI ON ( 1 1% )
PAYROLL TAXES ( 15.8%)
l Stan
l T STLINTMEN
(Litigation
5 %1 FirstValuation
Advanced
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Digital Movie
Page
Page175
50 of
of111
523
Page 50 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
C:IIIAC:H I NG
V O I C:E/STUNT IZOCIRD/ETI:
HEALTH h WELFARE ( 1 1 % )
FAYROLL TAXES ( 15. %
:
)
!:IT
STI-INT COr3R ( 5%
i1:AST 1N G D I RErI:T!]R
IZAsT I NG SIJPPL I E:; ( 5%)
MISCELLANEOUS
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
4 <I (11 (1) (1)
: E:-:C)(:)O.i)c]
: 20
I
: ::::3(1) (:)(I)
.
.
4I
1 5 (1)(:)
.(1)(1)
I8
:
:
:
:
1264. O i )
4 4 4 (11(1)
C.0(:)0 (:I(:)
:300, 00
(1)
0
,--------------(-------------.
TOTAL CAST
-------------------------------'------------'---------------i-------------
FITS:
KCINN ING TEENAGER ( P/ISY
DANCING G I R L ( P / D Y
F R I L L Y MClM
:
:
:
HEALTH ?A WELFARE/PENSION
PAYROLL TAXES (15.8%)
OVERT IME
F I T T I N G CHARGES
1
I
1
:
:
:
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
8
1
I
1
I
I
TOTAL B I T S :
I
I
EXTRAS:
SEE PRELIMINARY BOARD
150.00
150.00
150.00
-----------------------------------;------------;---------------;-------------
1
t
1400
1400
700
81
1
I
I
1
tI
1400
18375.00
4539.00
0
1 11271.89
: 1334.59
:
:
:
:
77.00
: 15520.00
8I
aI
I8
4.00
1 2452.16
0
: 5600. 00
1400
(1)
70(:)0.00
0
160
45000.00
5;. 00
I
I
13.13
6.57
STAND-INS ( 4 X 46 DAYS)
PAYROLL TAXES ( 15.8%)
HRW STAND- I N S (NUN UNION
FClX LUNCHES - EXTRAS
:
:
I 0
EXTRA ADJUSTMENTS ( D R I V E T O ) .
35. 00
I
I
OVERTIME ( 2 HRS)
OVERT1ME ( 1 ADD HR 1
F I T T I N G FEE
PAYROLL TAXES ( 15.8%
SERVICE FEE ( 10%)
: 150. 00
: 150.00
: 150.00
: O
: 0
: 71.
: 0
: 0
: 0
: 0
i 521.10
-----------------------------------'------------;---------------;------------I
380211.7(:)
4I
1t
122252.64
-----------,-----------------------I------------l---------------_:-------------
TOTAL EXTRAS AND STAND-INS
-----------------------------------I------------~---------------~------------I
I
I
I
I
-----------------------------------:------------;---------------o-------------
: :28:368'3. 44
-_----_---_--__-___-----------------------------------------------------
GRAND TOTAL ABOVE THE L I N E
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
4I
Page
Page176
51 of
of111
523
Page 51 of 76
I8
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
. ..
1,-
. < ,. , .
.'\.::,
t'.F,,:.!i
1 ~ .
. ,
.,
-.,-
:'_
I_
I'
ErD.
tE.
F.
G.
.,:
.-I.
K.
L.
M.
N.
N.
,'
;; ;!
. .
,,,
.,
il.
;:,-;-,;
. ..
. a ,
.. .
\ :
.:
,..$1.:
-8..
, '-%I.;
, ,.+:!:k 8
i:.'
:[-.:LI;> .. . j
'
,.,I1
.I...L
/;.:,.:
-.
.I
:-,
:
I
:
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
I
.,:s, ,. .
I
:A
..
.:
ZND 2 N T ! At1 ( P E R WEEK)

TrNrl Art PRODI-IC:I ON F E E ( P E R WEEK )
Ll11C:fiTI CIN MANAGER ( P E R WEEK )
!:;CR IF'T :i;IIF'EKV I:;OR
( P E R [IAY )
F'RODI-IC:T I ON C:I-\IIIRD I NATOR ( P R ClAY
TEC:HN I C A L AIIV I SOH ( PER D A Y
NI-IRSE ( P E R D A Y )
LI:IC:AT I ON AI-Itl ITOR ( P E R WEEK)
WELFARE/TEAC:HER ( P E R D A Y )
N I G H T PREMIUM ( 5 DAYS)-50%
IIIVERTIME ( 5 % )
;::;.;;c:;-!;y
;-
, .
.,.,:..:. i
j.'F
;;;l;,:;-!;,-!-;!~:.
_,I I.
<i.:s;..:~.,;
b!~ii:,.j
1~ ; !.-:>; ;:L:FI
I
I- (!:*Fcr< i&Et.: )
.; Ll 1 \?:!:TI:I&'
I
( (PER WEEK )
I
.. ,
. .:
.' -;. 1.
.,,,.
. .
.
I!
.
.'??;;'
:
I
. .
: .,!>
...
r
-
- .
~. ,
11:
2 7 (1)(1) (2(1) :
I=,
4 1(1) (1)(1) :
18 (1) (11 (1)(1) I
17I:( (1) (3[:I I
329.00 :
1000. (30 :
235.00 :
1-30. ( ~ 3:
#-.
.
.
1(1) :
.=.
*-+
at
,=a
--*
16:
43:
A1I
10:
1(2 !
121
300.00:
175. (30 :
13(:)0. 00 :
200.00 :
1175.00 1
.-I
L I
t
.5:
(-):
297(:)C).
i:~!
:=:?::(I)
(1)(
1 :: (1)
(1)I
13/-.
(:I(;)
01
2 r 5 ~ : 2(1):.
14Oc:)O. (111
li)l(:15.(111
1 1 59(:) (1)I
2: o (1)(1) (1)!
175(1). (111
156()(:, (111
4t70. (111
537.51
* ? l k 8 y .4:
.
.
: : : 5 f 1 4. (-),
11: (1)(1) ;
4
I
I
1
t
1
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
tI
I
I
9:
51 :
5:
10:
3000.00 :
340.00 :
~ - 3 50(11
. :
235. O(7 :
220.00:
275.00 :
150. 00 :
I
I
aI
.
.
-----------------------------------:------------;---------------a--------------
T O T A L PRI:IDUI_~T I ON S T A F F :
1'32557.9
-----------------------------------;------------1---------------1--------------
PROKII-ICT I ON OPERAT I NG S T A F F :
A.
C:AMERAMEN
D I RECTOR O F PHOTOGRAPHY ( P/WK
CAMERA OPERATOR ( 5;
( P/DAY
KEY 1 S T ASSISTANT ( P / D A Y )
1ST ASSISTANT (P/DAY)
2ND ASSISTANT (P/DAY)
VTR PLAYBACK (?/DAY)
S T I L L P H I ~ T I I C ~ R A P H E R( P / 3 H D A Y )
E X T R A CAMERA OPERATORS
N I G H T PREMIUM ( 5 D A Y S ) - 5 0 %
O. T. CAMERA CREW ( 10%
M 1SC:ELLANEI]I-I!E;
1
8
I
I
I
I
I
q
51:
41:
41:
F ?
4 I
c
9(25(] (30 :
I
I
I
I
II
1
I
.
.
2 7 (1)0 (3 (1)
1 7 3 4 0 . (1)'
11935. (11
9r5,C:5.0
Q(320, i)
1275. (3
1%(:)(:I (1)
(1)
4 5 2 5 . (7
E: 24,E: .(11
-----------------------------------#------------*---------------*--------------
TCITAL CAMERA S T A F F
'9(I)y4::
-----------------------------------I------------~---------------l--------------
SfIlI-IND DEPARTMENT
MIXER (F'/tIAY)
RECIIIHDER
FCICIM PERSON ( P / D A Y
11:AELE P E R S O N ( P / D A Y
IZAELE FtIlOM PERSCIN
RAD 1111PERSCIN
N I G H T P K E M ILlM ( 5 D A Y S - 5 0 %
O.T.
SlIlI-IND C:REW (1(11%)
M 1:~;(~:ELLANEIIII-I:I-;
I
I
t
I
1
I
I
I
41:
275. 00 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
41:
41:
235. (I):
I
I
I
I
I
I
c
LU
8
1
3725.00
I
I
t
I
I
a
12:
STAFF
WAR~IROFE IIlEPARTMENT
WARDROBE LIES i GNER ( P/WK
L.!,c)F;rr~f~;GC7 I 2 1
.
.
(:
18k.2. 5
324(:1. 7
--356.4:::.I:
".'CK,
W[IlMEI\I.':3 CJ&Rfiti!ilr*E 1 S T ( P / K l A Y )
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
I
I
I
Page
Page177
52 of
of111
523
Page 52 of 76
,
I
51:
.(1
aI
1/ 5 0 0 . 0 0
(-1
'?6:35. (1)
(11
------------------;------s------
. :1
I
I
-----------------------------------'------------#-----
TIIITAL S1:fUNEl
9/. --.-,.-I
'3 c
.
.-
(-1
I
t
I
I
11275. (1;
-4
235.00:
.(11
.(1;
la32(:)(:).
'
235.
a(:,:
1 1.?:::.y
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
(.
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
G.
SET DF;ES:-:ING DEF'AKTHENT

:SET [IEIZI:IK'ATIS~~ ( F'/ [IAY )
ASST SET [IEC:I:IRPTI:IR
( /='/DRY )
[lRES:::/RE[IRE:f;S/STF(
1K E
DRES::;/REDRESS/STR
J tc:E
[IRE:S:I;/RE[I~E!:;::;/STR
1K E
DRAPERY PERSON
r3REENSPERSl:lN
GREENSPERSON
N I G H T PREMILIM ( 5 D A Y S ) -50%
i t . T.
S E T DRESSING C:REW ( 10%)
M I SC:ELLANEl:lUS
. (1
4
I
51:
51:
.-, -,..-.c
.-, (1)(1) :
2 2(:1 (](:I :
8
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
,
t
a
I
(:
(:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.51
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2275.00
(:
.C
. (1
.
.r
.
I
I
1 1 *.;/: 5
11220.
(:
.i
1137. .?
24:1:4. 1
-----------------------------------I------------~---------------~--------------
TOTAL SET DRESSING S T A F F
26776.7
-----------------------------------:------------1---------------;--------------
H.
I
I
E L E C T R I C A L DEPARTMENT
I
1
43:
GAFFER ( P / D G Y 1
1
41:
BEST BOY ( P / D A Y )
I
I
41:
E L E C CIF'ERATINC; LABISR ( P/DAY
I
I
41:
E L E C OPERATING LABOR ( P / D A Y
I
I
I
I
E L E C OPERATING LABOR ( P / D A Y
1
I
41:
GENERATOR OPERATOR ( P / D A Y )
I
I
I
I
GENERATOR OPERATOR
I
I
I
I
ELECTRICAL RIGGING/STRIKING
I
a
I
I
E L E C T R I C A L R 11313IN G / S T R I k< I NCi
I
I
I
F A N OPERATOR
I
C I
I
.-I I
N IGHT F'REM I 1-IM ( 5 DAYS ) =50%
O.T.
E L E C T R I C DEPARTMENT (10%) :
I
I
I
M 1SCELLANEI~IJS
I
I
-----------------------------------'--------------;---------------:-------------.
235.00 :
222). 00 :
210.00:
210. 00 :
220.00
86.I(:).
I
I
.I
9c)2(:).(
.
.t
.
.
I
I
(.
I
I
I
5475.00
(.
27:::7. F
4810. :
I
I
10105. (1
5~(:)2(:) (1
161t:). (
TOTAL E L E C T R I C A L S T A F F
.(1
I
I
1
I
4 L Y- 1 2 . ;
c-,
-----------------------------------1------------;---------------1-------------I
I. S P E C I A L E F F E C T S
I
I
S P F X C I X t R D I NATOR ( P / D A Y
SF' FX OPERATING LABOR ( P / D A Y )
:
:3P F X OPERATING LABOR ( P / D A Y
:
I
I
!Z;FECIAL F X OPERATING LABOR
I
D E S I G N ING $< DRAFT 1NlIi LABI3R
I
I
I
ElESIGNING .9< D R A F T I N G LABClR
C1:lNSTRUC:T 1GIN tf R I 1 2 cI N I ~LABOR
:
C:ONSTRUCTION fq R I G G I N G LABOR
:
I
t
N IGHT PREM Il l M ( 5 DAYS 1 - 5 0 %
111.T. SF'E1:IAL
FX ElEPAHTMENT 10% :
1
M 1SCELLANElIlIJS
I
10:
10:
10 :
305. (20 :
:
3(:)5.0cJ
:
3<15.c)0
1
I
I
I
..-I
100.
1525.
(
1
(:I
.'
I
I
(I(]
I
C1.Q:
3(:15(:).
..I.(-1
I
I
C I
1
(1)5 (1)
: :1
5:
.
.
5 (11.
.
.
5 (1) .
I
I
762.
1041.
-----------------------------------;------------;---------------;------------I
I
S E T STANDBY OPERATORS
I
I
I
CARPENTER ( F / D A Y )
I
CARPENTER ( P / D A Y )
I
I
I
EXTRA CARPENTER LABOR
I
N I G H T PREMIUM ( 5 D A Y S ) - 5 0 %
I
TI. T
SET z;TAwryrE!v ~ I F E R ~ ~ T I ~ 1(5%
IHS :
,
1 :! 11.EL L& Pi 1'11i-I .=,
I
I
1(11 :
1(:I:
250.00 :
.-, .-.
.>c (j
o:
TOTAL S P E C I A L F X S T A F F
-----------------------------------'------------:---------------;------------J.
.-.
-1.
1
..-I
E 8
I
100. 00 :
1250.09 1
I1
I
I
I
I
I
t
11453.
577.
-----------------------------------~------------*---------------*-------------
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page178
53 of
of111
523
Page 53 of 76
.
.
.
/-.'7.-' .
- (-1.-I(-1
c
L .--.-a (1
::: (1)(1)
.TC
a:.>.
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
7.
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
.
TIIITAL :SET S / F l3F'EKF;T I PIIIi :i;TAFF

/.352. .5(
----------------------------------- ------------ I__---_----_-_--(-_----- I
I .
:SET STANDBY F'A I NTER5;
I
. I
.=,
.::. s(1), (1) :
:: (1)4 C) . (1)(
P A I N T E R (F'/DAY)
.(1)(
F'A I N T E R
.-I
i
1 0 (1) (1)(1) :
3 1 )(11 0 (
EXTRA F A I N T E R L A B I ~ R
.3
JL4.
(I)(
13. T . S E T STANDBY F'fi INTER::: 10% :
8I
f
I
,La
I
I
M ISC:ELLANEIIII-IS
TOTAL SET S / B F A I N T I N G STAFF
I
I
____________
4
I
I
I
356.4. (I)(
-----------------------------------l------------~---------------~--------------.
L.
S E T WATCHMEN
WATCHMON ( P / D A Y )
WATCHMAN
E X T R A WATCHMAN L A E S R
0 . T. S E T WATCHMAN
MISCELLANEOUS
I
I
45:
150. (10:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
8
I
I
I
I
I
I
.(I)
675(:).
(:I(
(I)(
.(111
&75.0(
-,---------------------------------~------------~---------------~------------T O T A L S E T WATCHMEN S T A F F
7425.
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
1o :
30o. CIO :
01
3000. (11.
I
I
I
I
(:I(
,----------------------------------I------------'---------------*--------------.
M.
FIREMEN/POLICEMEN
FIREMAN (P/DAY)
FIREMAN
POLICEMAN (P/DAY)
POLICEMAN (P/DAY)
P O LICEMAN
P O LICEMAN
E X T R A F I R E / P O L I C E LABOR
0 . T. F I R E M E N / P O L I C E M E N ( 1 0 % )
MISCELLANEOUS
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
:
250. oo :
40 :
20 :
1C I O C ) ~ .CI
5000. c:
250.00
.0
.
0 1
(1).
1S Of:) (1:
-----------------------------------I------------'---------------l--------------
TOTAL FIHEIPOLICE
STAFF
19:::
00 C!
-----------------------------------I------------'---------------l--------------
WRANGLERS
ta
t
S P C A MAN
I
H E A D WRANGLER ( P / D A Y )
WRANGLER
*
WRANGLER
TRAINER
E X T R A A N I M A L LABOR
O. T. WRANGLERS ( 10%
MISCELLANEOUS
-----------------------------------'------------'---------------i-------------T O T A L WRANGLER S T A F F
I
0.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(-1
(-1
.(1:
(11.
.Ci
.
.C .
(-1
...............................................................................
P.
TEAMSTERS (NOTE: 1 MAN F'ER ! ! ! ) : (NOTE:
. 5 / W : 1 WHOLE WEE/::)
:
CAMERA ( P/WK
10 :
22(:)(:)
.0(:):
I
I
G R I P (F/Wt<)
ELECTRII:
(P/WK
S E T C:IIINTRI-ICT IGIN ( F/Wt< )
ART DEPT (P/WK)
,
PROP ( P/WEEK 1
WAHDHIIIBE ( F / W K
a
MAKE-UP (P/WK
,
HONEYWAGON ( P/WK )
a
HONEYLJAGCIN (F'/G!!I )
:3F'EC.iAL F X (P/Wt:::)
a
F'ICt:::-I-IF' $:ERVICE (F'/Wt:::)
N 1GHT
1l-1141 ( 5 EIAY:; ) -s(:)%
Advanced
Stan
J.
Media
Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Page
Page179
54 of
of111
523
O.Caterbone
T.
TEfiM:3TER:3
(Digital
10%1 Movie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
II
Page 54 of 76
a-.
I
I
3.4 :
8.4:
Z.4:
5:. 4 :
3.4:
:.C. t
2. 4 :
9:
L
--I
- II
a1
.0
I
I
I
I
.(-1
.
.
.
.C'
.(1;
225)(:)0 (11
1 &.(:I0 a(:):
1&.(:I(:). (:I(] :
1600. OC) :
1 &.(:I(:). O ( j :
1Gc:)O. 0 0 :
1 &(:)(:I (:)a :
1 6.00 .(1)(1) :
1 /.<I (1.(1)(1) :
1 /-.1:) (1) .(1)(1) :
1: :1 4 (1) C) (1)(1) :
4:3[)0. (1
1:344(:).c
13440. (:
1344(:).1:
13440. i
1344(::
'
"-j : r-.
.
1 44(3(3.
s.:.-I
.~
,-., 4 (-)
1-
(;I
- December
&7(:)0.
Tuesday
Wednesday
October27,
5, 2016
4
I
(:,
1.2374. (:;
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
10.
S E T r:ONI=;TRIJi:T
IClN
DAY!:;/WEEKS
RATE
TOTAL
-----------------------------------I------------*---------------~-------------.
A.
AA.
F.
C:.
D.
E.
F.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
10.
17
13.
19.
-. LC).
21.
PRODI-KT I O N D E S I G N E R ( P / W K )
ART D I R E C T O R
ASST ART D I R E C T O R
S;k,'ETcH A R T I S T
DRAFTSMAN ( P / D Y
SET SUPERVISOR ( P / D Y )
MISC: F X / B L t I G S / t I R E S S I N G S :
MUTANT F X (sea + s o r e e t c )
BANDSTAND
PIER
SHOOT ING GALLERY
C A S T L E OF TERROR
VIC'S OFFICE
CONTAM IN A T E D BEACH
E;HER IFF S T A T I
ClN
DCiC K L E I I \ J ' S
K T L V NEWS S T A T I O N
R I C E ' S APT
LlLTR I MA INSTI TI-ITE
D I V E R ' S HOUSE
M O L L I E ' S FAR
PI-ITLER HOl-ISE
C:HARLIE'S I 2 A B I N
B A R N E Y ' S HfIiI-I:SE
R O L L E R CCiASTEF\:
WRECKED P L A N E
C:lIINTF;'CILLERf
RRlIlH
MUTANT FX MAN H%W ( P / D Y 1
R IGG ING G R I P L A B O R ( P/Wt< 1
:E;TF; 1I::1NG
BQC:K 1NGS
IIiREENS
20(:)(:).
I
I
16:
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
8
I
I
I
II
1
I
2:
2 5 ~ j (. j O :
15:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- 1
[
I
1:
1:
1:
1:
1:
1:
1:
1:
1:
.I
.
4(:)(:).
3750. I
.
250. OC) :
I
4
320(:)(:).
I
1:
1:
1I
1:
1:
1:
1:
1:
1:
1:
a>,=
4 18
8:
1 1 lcs~ro.0 0 :
1 o<)(1)0 (:I C) :
5(1)(3(1) (1(1) :
500. (:to:
.5000.i)(j:
50(1) 00 :
5 (1)(1) (1)(1) :
5 i)(:l (1) :
30(I)(:) (I)(] :
1 ooo. 00 :
300(:).
:
5000
:
500.00 :
500. ()(I) :
:I;(:)(:)(:)
(10:
80(1)(1). 00 :
20(1). ( j O :
SO(:).
:
5(:)(110 (:)(:I :
50(:).()a :
131 (:)(I) :
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
400.O.Q:
I
I
I
I
I
8
aI
I
I
t
I
aI
.
.
1 1 1 (1)(1)0
1 C) (11(1)0 .:
5~:)
(1)0 (
500. .
5(1)(1)(:) .:
5 (:I 0 .
5 (1,(1)
(
c -La (-) (-1
:30(1)(1). I
1
3 (1)(:I (1) '
5 (1)(1)
500.
5;c)O. i
:3(j00. c
S0(30.1
Zc)(:). 1
50(:).:
5 (1)(1)(1) :
c
.-I (-1
- (1)
2ts:35
2:2 (1)(11
.
.
.
.
.
.
-----------------------------------I------------*----------------l-------------
T O T A L S E T CONSTRUCT I11iN
2(:)5185.
-----------------------------------l------------;---------------l-------------
1 1.
A.
I3
C:.
1 .
E.
F.
G.
H.
S E T O F E R A T I N G EXPENSES:
I
I
C;
I
.
1
I
C. I
a=s
C:AMERA E12UI FMENT R E N T A L S

C:AMERA EI;!I-I I PMENT PI-IRCHASES
VTR F'LAYEAC:K R E N T A L
IZAMERG CRANE R E N T A L S
WARDRI:IEIC PI-1RC:HA:E;ED
[,!&Z
;.:.
.,
.,,7
L ,
I
I
;,k;iTp,Lz;
WARtfROBE MA INTENANCE
G R I P Ef;!U IPMENT R E N T E D
;-.:t-,
I . J. PROF'
EC.!.!r-l
I F'MENT
RENTE
D
Advanced
Stan
Caterbone
Media
Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital
Movie
I
C.C.I-IC..:-
C.1 I C - I - . U A . ? C T ,
aI
I
I
1:
1:
1:
.-.cs ,
:>
-. ,
I
.-.
1
I
a=-
.=,
Page
Page180
55 of
of111
523
I
Page 55 of 76
.=a
t
I
t
.
.
.
5 (1)(1)(1) (1)(1) :
' 7 -0 0 (1)(1) :
1 5 0 (j (1)(1) :
2(:)(I)(] (](I) i
4 0 (1)(:I (1)
1 t.(:)i)
1 50(11
20 (1)(1) .
3(>(:)(:)(:)
(:I(:)
:
3(1) (1)(1)(1:
c (-1-(-1
- (1)Q :
4 r_1 ,:. .
4 (1)(1) (1)(1) :
33:)(:)
2(11(1)(1) (1)(1) :
1 6.(1).C,0 0 ..
5 (1) (1) December
(1) (1)October
:
.,
Tuesday
Wednesday
27,
5, 20164 0(:)(:)
- .
.
.-I
..
.
.
.
?:(
1 C; 1-1 1 3
i-11-1
1 .?(-I [-)I-)
05.03.2007
t-..
PKLII-'::.
._.
FiENlEIl
. :1
2 (:I(1)(11 . (1)(11 :
~ROFS-LI:IS::;
RND LIQMAII;E-~%
, District
U.S.
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
,
1 (1) (1)(1) (1) (1) :
:I;C!l-INB El;!I-I I PMENT RENTED
/1,(:)(1,.
:
WALt::I E TALI:::IES RENTEL1
.-,
2(1) (1)(1) (1, (1) :
111. Nl-1R:I;EKY F'URI::HASE[I
AND RENTED
:
.-.
.-* ,
f .
MAt:zE-l-lF' Fl-lRCHA:I;ES
25(:,.00 :
G!.
HA I RDFtE::::3 ING PI_IRC:HA::;E:3/RENTAL::;
:
2.y(1) , (1)(1) ;
'I'
4 (1)0 (1) I:( (1) :
R.
ELECTR IC:AL EI;!I_IIPMENT RENTALS
;
c (-I()
- - ()(:I
:
.-'
S.
E L E C T R I C A L EQll IPMENT F'I_~RI::HA::;ED :
T.
GASOLINE-RENTAL VEHICLES ( 1 0 x 2 ) :
2 (1, :
:: (1) 0 (1) :
:;: I(: 0 (1) :
4 (1) :
U.
~3ENERATOFi RENTALS ( GAS ONLY
.3
V.
S P E C I A L F X RENTALS/PURC:HASES
L
.
3(:)00.
<I(:, :
S:
45(:). <)(I:
W.
PROP TRUCE RENTAL
,
700. c)o :
X 1. WARTIROBE TRUCK RENTAL
0
4 5 0 . 00 :
XZ. SET DRESSING TRUCE RENTAL
c
u
X 3 . SET CONTSTRUCTION TRUCK RENT
:
L*
450.00 1
:3 :
2000.00 :
X4. HONEYWAGON 1
t
.-I
X 5 . HONEYWAGON 2
,
i
2()0(3 ( 1 0 :
3:
700.00 :
X 6 . MAKE-UP THAILOR RENTAL
I
I
Y.
P I C T U R E V E H I C L E RENTALS:
Y1. BARNIE'S BOAT ( P / D Y )
1:
300. (10:
Y 2 . CHARLIE'S BOAT ( P / D Y
a
1:
100.00 :
Y3. DIVER'S BOAT ( P / D Y )
21
300.00 :
'-,
V4. COAST GUARD BOAT ( P / D Y )
i
4 0 0 . 00 :
1:
100.00:
Y5. R I C K ' S CAR ( P / D Y )
I
r.
L'
400. 00 :
Y 6 . AMBULANCE ( P / D Y )
5:
200.00:
Y7. PAM'S CAR ( P / D Y )
Y8. J E S S I E ' S CAR ( P / D Y )
I
1:
100. 00 :
Y9. PICK-UP TRUCK ( P / D Y )
I
1:
100.00:
c.
Y 1 0 . P O L I C E CAR ( P / D Y )
a
200.00 :
Y11-BARNEY'S ROVER ( P / D Y )
1:
100.00 :
Y I Z . P O L I C E WAGON ( P / D Y )
t
1:
2(:)c).0 0 :
--,
Y13.STAN'S
CAR ( P / D Y )
L
1(:)
00(
: I.
Y1S. C. GUARD CAGE ( P / D Y )
I
1:
4 0 0 . 00 :
2:
20(:). 00 :
Y16.VIC'S
BOAT ( P / D Y ) I
ZCAMERA BOAT RENTAL (F'/DY)
2
500.00 :
I
ZZ. M I S C RENTALS/PUHCHASES ( 5 % )
I
L.
M.
t\l.
a81.
_*
c=o
I-.
8
x
8
_I
61
.
.
.
1-1
I
t
3 1 ,
.
.
,I
I
I
1I
I
.-.
1
I
1
I
1'1
-.a
1
I
I
4
1t
1
I
1
8
I
II
I
l
I
1
1
I
1
I
I
I
I
1
.-.
1
1
II
I
1
8I
I
I
I
1
I
I
.-a
--,-,----*
TOTAL SET OPEHATI ON EXPENSES:
I
I
I
I
I
I
--------
.----'---------------II
I
I
tI
.----:---------------I-
-----------------,-----------------'-I------
12. LOCAT I O N :
I
I
I
I
I
I
A.
B.
C.
C1.
D.
Dl.
A I R F A R E S (NY-LA)
HOTEL-DIR/PRODUCER-NY
( P/MO 1
MEALS (PD 2 X 1 7 X 7 ) EIIR/PFC'OD NY
MEALS (PD 2 X 1 7 X 7 ) DIH/PROD N J
L O C A T I O N S I T E S RENTAL:
BANDSTAND AREA ( P / D Y )
D2. A I R F I E L D ( P / D Y )
D3. P I E R ( P / D Y )
D4. BOAT R I D E ( P / D Y )
D5. SHOOTING GALLERY ( P / D Y )
DG. CASTLE O F TERROR ( P / D Y )
D7. V I C ' S O F F I C E ( P / D Y )
D8. CONTAMINATED BEACH ( P / D Y )
D9. SHER IFF STAT ION ( P/DY
rl10. DOC t < L E I N N S ( P / D Y )
D 1 1 . K T L V NEWS S T A T I O N ( P / D Y )
F 1 2. THE DOCyI.::: ( F'.;DY )
D13. R I O K ' S APARTMENT ( P / D Y )
D14.ULTRIMA INSTITLITE (P/LIY)
D15.DIVER'!s Hlrrl-lSE (F'/EIY)
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page181
56 of
of111
523
D 1 G . I I O L L I E FEES F A R ,(F/KlY)
Page 56 of 76
10:
4:
3C.C'
&&.em
1
1.5;k.O. 00 :
11(1) (1)(1) (j
(1) :
100. 00-I_
.>.>qI
L.-.C
75.00
I
I
I:
8:
1:
1:
10:
1:
4:
.i
-,
1
1
.-I
1;
<r
i
l
C' It
.-I ,
C I
:3 :
1 !
I
I
C I
.-I
I
200 ()(:I :
4 0 0 . 00:
1000. 00 :
75(:). 00 :
5(:)(?.
(10 :
75(1). (10 :
300. 00:
150(:). 00 :
10(:)5) 00 :
E:(:)0 00 :
55)(j. (jc) :
1 S(:)c). 00 :
750. (I)()
:
15(:)0. (:)(:I :
50 (3 (11(1)
: October27,
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
5, 2016
.
.
.
(->(-I
(->
I-> (-1 !
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
t l 1 7 . El-ITLER HI:IILI::;E
( F/DY )
[IlE:. IIHARLIE":_: [ : A D I N ( P / D Y )
I:119. C:HARLIE":i; [ICIC:~::: ( P / [ I Y )
D31. 1_7lIlNTR1]LLER.':f; Rr:l:lPl
( F / [IY
t121. ROLLER ClIlASTER ( F'/DY )
E.
El.
E2.
F.
G.
GI.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
M.
N.
0.
P.
Q.
R.
S.
T.
1(1)(1)(1) (1)(1) :
75 (1, (1)(1) :
:>0 (1) (1)(1) :
2(j0.(:)(:I :
1(:)(:)(:)
00 :
I
I
O F F I C E RENTAL-WILDWOOtI(P/DY
OFFIIZE El2IlIPMENT (F'/WP:)
,
E D I T RM RENT-W 1LtlWOi1t1 ( P/DY )
CAR RENTALS-2 C? 8 NO
BUS RENTALS (CREW-ROUND T R I P )
:
M I N I VANS ( 6 VEH C? 2 NO)
L A TO NY DRIVER-HOTEL h FD/DY
:
SUNDRY EMPLOYEES ( 6 P A / 10 WK')
:
E D I T O R I A L EQUIP-WILDWOOD ( F ' / M O ) :
1
G R A T U I T I E S (P/WK)
I
SCOUTING ti PRE-PRODUCT I O N
PERMITS
CREW ENTERTAINMENT
OTHER - I D L E SUN ( S X 5 5 )
OTHER
CREW HOTEL
I
OTHER - CREW P.D.
(60x56)
OTHER - I D L E SAT ( 8 x 5 5 )
OTHER - WILDWOOD PHONE (F'/WK)
:
MISCELLANEOUS
8
II
I
I
I
I
II
II
.
.
.
. (1) (1
(1)(:I )(: (:
2 25 (1) (1) (:
: : 1 (1) (1) (1)C
::
)(:
.- (I)c,:
.
. C)(.
:I:(1,(1)(1) (1)(:
- .
8(3. (110:
450. (ji):
40. 0(?:
650.00 :
1150. 00 1
8C)C).00 :
150. 00 :
250.00:
1900. 00 :
500.00 :
1500.00 :
200.00:
1000.00 :
90.00 : F .1 .
4-~:?~,':.
40.00 1
90. 00 :
900.00 :
J J
9/-.(1)(1).
OC
7650. (:I(:
c C) (1)(:
1(1)4 (11(1) (1)(:
1150 0i
96(:)(:)0(:
2 1c10. a(:
15(:)(?0.
(I(:
4275. (I(
50(?0.0(.
3000. (I(
:34(:)0.OC
100C)O.O(
3960(1.o(
104(+0C);-[)C
10400(:).
396C)(?.0 :
15300. (1
.-a
.I
C.
.
.
.
.
(!
l
e
II
I
I
--------------;--------------
-----------------------------------I-------
TOTAL LOCATION EXPENSES:
I
I
-----------------------------------I-------
I
I
.i.
543:335. (1;
--------------(--------------
I
I
13. TESTS AND RETAKES:

A.
TESTS/RETAKES- 1 DAY EA :
D I R OF PHOTOG ( P / I l Y
CAM OPER ( P / D Y )
MIXER ( P / D Y )
BOOM ( P / D Y
GAFFER ( P / D Y )
KEY G R I P ( P / D Y )
PROPMASTER ( P / t l Y )
WARDROBE ( P / D Y )
MAKE-UP/HAIR
(P/DY)
SCRIPT ( P / D Y >
PAM (P/LIY)
RICE (P/DY)
OVERT IME ( 10%
>
E. IJNDERWATER PHOTOGRAFHY:
4 ROUND T R I P TO F L O R I D A
M I A M I HOTEL ( 4 X 2 )
PER D I E M ( 2 X 2 )
CAR RENTAL ( P / D Y )
CAMERA RENTAL ( P / D Y >
INCIDENTALS ( P / D Y )
UNDERWATER D I R PHOTO ( P/DY
UNDERWATER c7AM AS:3T ( P / D Y )
E:.ECTF:IC:
(P/trY)
ELECTRIC ( P / D Y )
ELECTRIC: ( P / D Y >
GRIP ( P / D Y )
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
Group
Litigation
Digital Movie
GRIP
(P/~
I Y ) FirstValuation
I
I
.(1.
I
I
600.00 :
340.00 :
275.00 :
235.00 :
235.00 :
235.00 :
235.90:
235. 0(:):
235. oo :
235.00155(1).00 :
550.00 :
I
I
12(:)0. 0
k.30. 0
550. (1)
.
.
.
.
4 7(1) (11
470. (7
4 70 0
470. O
47(1) (1'
4 70 (1)
4 7(:I 0
55(:).[>
5 5 ~ 1c;.
682. c>
.C'
.
I
I
6.00. 00 :
100. 00 :
50. (I(:, :
50. (10 :
500. 90 :
2(:)(:).
<)(I
:
5(1)0 (1)c1 :
500. 0 C ) :
23:). (:)(I:
2:3(1) (I)o :
2: (1) (1)0 :
2400 (1)
3(:)(:)(11
2C1@.(1
1 (:I(:)
(1.
1 (1)(1) cj
4(:)0.(.:
10(I)O.(I!
1(1)(1)(1: 1.-c
n /
:
,5(-(>.
..
54.0 (1;
.'. C'(-)- (1)(I)
5 6.(1) (1;
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 20163/.(1) (1;
.-.
L -1(I)
: (I)(I) :
.
.
.
..
.- .
- - .
1
Page
Page182
57 of
of111
523
Page 57 of 76
L ' - a
.-,
05.03.2007
.
.
.
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
:3AFTEY 11
I VER
F'/lIY )
lIlN 1I:fiMERA [I I VER ( F'/ DY )
/:::IT FEE ( F L A )
ClVERT I ME ( FLA- l O % )
N 1:~;C:ELL+?NEI~II-I~
F 1LM tc F'F;I:IC:ES;S
( :SEE ~ C I S )T
I
t
.L
20 :
TI~ITRL TE:Z;TS AND RETAKES:
.
.
.
.
.
.
2(1)7 5 (1) . (1)(1)
2:E:C). (y) (1) r

- (11(1) ;
5 (1) . (1)(1) :
I
I
.-I
I:.
5 6.(1) (1)(1)
7k. (1) (1)(1)
10 0(I)(:)(:I
4.6 : (): (1)
0 (1)
4
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
@
I
I
I
I
I
I
(:)(:I
-----------------------------------I------------~---------------'---------------
-----------------------------------'------------;--------------TOTAL SET LlESIGN/LOCATION/TESTS:
---------------
................................................................................
................................................................................
14. IZUTT I N G F I L M LABORATORY
: tlAYS/l-JEEES :
RATE
I
I
103&.&.87.
5C)
TOTAL
--,--------------------------------~------------l---------------~--------------I
I
I
E D I T O R (P/WK)
ASST EDITOR (P/50 HR WK)
SOUND CUTTER ( P / 5 0 HR WK)
MIASIC CUTTER ( P / 5 0 HR WK
N E G A T I V E CUTTER ( P / R E E L )
4.
E.
C.
D.
E.
tI
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:2 :
--.
. h3 ~ :6
.025 :
F.
c
-1
I
I
1257 :
(-I.-.
- - II
.:3375:
I
II
I
t
-----------------------------------'------------*---------------'-------------7-,
I 1-1 i
iz:!-!TT 1 :<:;,
1 ., ,.
- .Is;;& 7 .11fi)':
--
1(1) :
2400. 00 :
1000. 0(1):
1425. OC) :
1425.00:
53:). (10:
aI
24 :
24 :
10:
8a
N E G A T I V E P I X RAW STOCK ( F / F T )
:
G.
N E G A T I V E SOUNI! RAW STOCK ( F i / F T ) :
H.
TRANSFER F I L M TO V I D E O ( P / H K )
:
I. DEV A C T I O N (NO TAX P / F T ) C! 65% :
J.
XFER SOUND (NO TAX P / F T ) @ 65% :
E. P R I N T A C T I O N ( 1 2 ( I ) K x 0 5 % ) - I N C L T A X :
L
F'R I NT SOl-lND ( 146K:<&5%
> -INCL TAX :
M.
MAGSTR IPE-PRODUCT ICiN P/REEL
I
N.
MACiSTR IPE-SCORE.~IDUEB INla/P/REEL
:
1 .
INTERNEGAT IVE
aI
P.
INTERPOS IT IVE
a
3.
hNSWER P R I N T ( I N O L TAX)
I
R.
CI:IMPI:ISITE
CHECK P T ( I N C L TAX )
:
:=7.
FADE/DISSOLVE/DUPE/FINE GRAIN
:
T.
T I T L E S - M A I N k END
aI
1-1.
PROclECT ION-W ILDWOlSD ONLY-NC@LAE :
V.
CI:[I ING-SYNC SOUND P / F T
I
W.
CClDING-W I L D TRACE P / F T
t6
X.
MOV IOLA RENTAL ( P/WK
I
I
Y.
REELS % LEADER (P/WK)
1
Z
C:UTT 1NG ROOM !::llPPL 1 ES
AA. STOIZK SHOTS
I
EB. /:::EMh SUPPLY RENTAL
Ia
CC. ED I T O R I A L CREW OVERT IME ( 10%) :
(j
-3c.I
&a%.
10 :
10:
1.11:
1.11 1
1:
..::A5 :
4C) :
1:
:3 :
1.5:
1.5:
24 :
-24:
24;
1:
15:
L,
Zz(1) (:)(I) :
7:30(:)0. (30 :
9 1000. 06 :
7:3000. 00 :
1(1)(30.o(51
:30
.
.
)(:
:EX:) 00 :
'.?50(:), (10:
C/5(:)0. 0(j:
1(:)(:I (:)I
00 :
75(:)0. 510 : -
:
12(j(jo (:I(:) :
2(j(1) C) (1) :
-5'500.00 :
c.. .-I(-)(-)
~ - e - .C)(] :
13;).
tj(:)
.
.
150.
5(j
13 1 )
3(1)(1)(1)
1y j 0 .
00:
.(j(3 :
.(1)(1) :
.0 (1) :
:
I
I
I
I
-\
-:
120000. (20 :
14(1(1(:)(:) o(j :
576.(:)0. (I(
24(j(?O.(I(.
1425(1).()I(
114(1)(j.
d.-I(-1
ec
- (-1- (1),:
(1)i:
39 1~ ( 5 . 0 ; :
350(1).Oi..
lzz(). (:)
1(j(j38. /,(:
2730. (:I(:'
24325. (:)(I;
345:::. (jC:
3(1)(1) (1)(:
E:(1)(11 (1)c;
1(115 4 5 c): (1:
10545. (I(:'
1ocjOc:). (:)(
3(3E:7 st:.
6000 ,c: (1:
12 (1)(1)0 (1)(I.
16 0(1) (1)(1:
14250. (:I(:.
14 25(j (:I(::
:.. 6 00 (I
(I)
12(2 (1) (1) -1
:: 6.(1)(1) i t r:
:30 (1)(1) (1)
2:35(1) (1) (1) (1;
11275. (:)(:I
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
*
.-,.-. L
.=..:*q
--..:.,qi
-----------------------------------'------------;---------------l---------------
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page183
58 of
of111
523
Page 58 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
(I)!T'
i
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
_____--____________--.--------------'-I----------~---------------'--------_
1 5 . MI-1;:;
1 11::
II
<
0
I
FF\'ENII:H L IC:/:::-l::l~l:~;T TlIl C:lIlMF'LETE

I_II\I~IER:~C:IIIRE-I~:I~I:~T
TI] C:l:lMF'LETE
TRANSFER.:;
:sTIIIC:t:x (TAX 1NC:LIJDED)
EDITINO (P/REEL)
M I :f;rZELLANElSUS ( 5%)
A.
B.
C.
[I.
E.
F.
II
I
I
II
.Us-.-
I
I
----,------------------------------*------------*---------------;-------------TOTAL MI-IS1C:
1I
1I
(1):: :
1
-.:-.a
'2
.. II
10 :
I 2 (1)(11(:) (1) . (11

:3(1) (1)(1)(1) , (11
4 5 (1) . (1)
.a
.. .-I.>
c.-,c
12 (1)(1)(1)(:I
(:I :
:(I
(1)(11(1) (:) (1) :
15 (1)(1) (1) 1
15 (1)(1)(1) 0 (1) :
1(1)(1)(1) 00 :
.
.
.
.
a
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
.
.
.-t
1 (:)(1)(1)(:) (1)
(-)
(-1
1rCa140:_:.
5
-----------------------------------;------------l---------------'-------------I
1(-.
::;ilUND :
E.
C.
D.
E.
F.
Y
I .
H.
I
J.
K.
L.
M
N.
0.
P.
I!.
;
R.
S.
T.
1
1
.
Dl-ISBING ROOM RENTAL

LABOR FOR PRE-DUB,
ETC (HHS)
LAPIIR FOR DUB ( 3 M I X E R / 3 0 HR)
F'OWER S T A T I O N @ ADD 50%
SOUNF FX PACKAGE ( P / R E E L
STOCK (PRE-DUB P / R O L L I N C L T X )
STOCK (DUE P / R O L L I N C L T X )
ADR, LClOPI NG, NARRATICIN ( P / H H )
!STOCK ( RENTAL
TRANSFERS (P/HH)
STOCK INCLIJEIING TAX
L ~ I C ~ELI
P ITOR:?;
WALLA GROUP
FOLEY (SOILNTI F X / H R )
STOCK (RENTAL)
TRANSFERS ( HOURS
STOCK INCLUDING TAX
FOLEY WALKERS (HRS)
DUPE TRANSFER
STOCK 1NC:LUtIING TAX
SCREEN ING ( F/HR )
tI
I
I
A.
I
I
22;
18:
90 :
I
I
I
I
II
10 :
:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
101
10:
36 :
10:
15:
.C)2(s.b:
1:
1:
I
I
45:
1
I
aI
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
10:
15:
.02&.4:
36:
3:
.026G :
8:
20(j. 05, :
4 C) (1 c) :
.
(1) .c (1) :
z[;)(j(:)
.(1) :
/; (11
I
I
f-1
26.4.3 :
6 3 . 5'[3 :
250. @(I :
215. (30 :
75.00 :
3(1)(3(1)(3 (1)(1:
.:.-.
. .-,
s=(1)(1) (1) 0 :
:3(j(j(:).
00 :
2 5 (3 (1)(11:
.-,c (:)C) :
75. 00 :
3(:)(:)(5 (1) o(:) :
L O . 0~:):
75 (1)(1) :
3:0
)(1)0 (1)(3 :
.-I (-1
- (1)~:) :
.
.
L -1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.-*
- (1) .i)
5 (1)(:) (1)(11.(1)
4 4 0 (1)
7 2 (1)(11 (1)
54(:)(30.(1)
.Xs-/
A a-m
C*(-1
24.t..c
.
.
c.:35' (1.
9(1)
(1
250. c
1125. c
798. 0
35CHI (1)
3C 1 0 (1) 0
11250. CI
2 5 (3 (11
1125. (3
7.33. c:
2 16,(1) (1)
6.(1)(1) (I!
7 9 c. (-!.
4(11(1) (:!
.
.
.
a-
#-,
.
.
.
.
.C!
-----------------------------------;------------1---------------*--------------
TCITAL SI:ICIN[I:
1:34359.::
-----------------------------------+---------;---------------a-------------I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
1
I
-----------------------------------;------------s---------------t--------------
GRAND TOTAL CI_ITTING/FILM/LAB
...............................................................................
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page184
59 of
of111
523
Page 59 of 76
/.7*5"39 1 9
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
17.
F'l-1tLIC:ITY:
G!I-/ANTI TY
I
8
A.
RRTE
T 111
T iiL
II
AKIVERT 12;I NG
I
I
E. 1-IN I T F'I-IBL IC: ITY F'ER::;l:lN
I
I
C:.
ENTERTAINMENT
I
[I.
TRA[IE/NEWSPAPER SUBSCR 1PT IONS
:
E.
PI-1BLIC:I TY ST I L L S SALARIES
I
a
F.
PI-IFL IC: I TY ST I L L S St-IPPL IES/EQI_I IP :
13.
F'I1FLIII:I TY S T 1 L L S L A B CHARCiES
I
H.
S T I L L GALLERY RENTAL/EXPENSE
:
I. TRAILER
I
.-I.
PRESS PREVIEW EXPENSE
8
1
I:::.
SUPPL IES/PnSTAC;E/EXPRESS
tI
L
MI SI:ELLANEIII-IS
I
I
M.
OTHER
I
N.
OTHER
0I
0.
OTHER
II
I
.
.
.(1
(.
(:
I
I
1I
tI
I
I
I
1
8I
I
1
1
I
8
1
1a
tI
tI
aI
I
I
I
I
I
I
. (1
a
1
4I
.-
TOTAL PUBLIC ITY:
.i
.
.
.
.
(:
(.
(.
18.
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
13.
H.
I;
MISCELLANEOUS
VACATION ALLOWANCE (DGA)
RETROACTIVE WAGE CONTINGENCY
SI-INDRY UNCLASS IF I E t I EXPENSE
CIIISTS
IN SUSPENSE ( E PEETERS)
SET COFFEE
WATER %
. .ICE
OTHER
OTHER
OTHER
T I ~ T A L M I SlZELLANEl:lU!::
1F/.
1NSURANC:E/TAXE!E;/L 1CENSE/FEE!Z:
I
48
aI
I
I
I
I
I
I
.a7292 1
:
1
(.
.(:
.
(:
41
oo(:).
1 : ( 50,
aI
8:
k.CI
I
I
S:
6 (1(1 (3(:I
a
I
at
aI
aI
0I
81
t
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(I(:)
)
.
.
.
.
.O C ) :
4::: (11 0
4:30(1)
(
(
.
.(1
(.
(.
.C
19121m
CAST 1N!slJRANC:E
NEGATIVE 1NSURAblrI:E
L IFE IN:XIRANCE
M ISC:ELLANEI~I-I!~1NSI-IRANCE
I::OMF' Zc PI-IELIC: L I A B I L I T Y I N S
S1:rCIkL :3ECI-IR 1.rY T&X
F'ERSONAL PRlItPERTY 1NSLIRANIZE
W1IlRk::ER .':f; C:I]WFENSAT 1IIIN TAX
1I:IltIE C:ERT IF I C:ATE - MPAA
C I T Y TFiX AND LICENSE
1-INEMPLI:I\'MENT TAX ( I T A T E
IINEMF'LIIYPIENT TAX ( F E D )
HZrW/F'ENS ION-NAFET ( F'/EIY )
F'ENyZ;I ON F'LAN-C!IIi# ( 5 . 7(:):3%
)
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
8I
.t
1:
.
.i
.i
.i
-----------------------------------;------------;--------------I
(:
(.
.
.
7.5(1) (1) .
.
&.&,27:3.
?.
.
43:::45. :I:(:
(I)(I) .
.
-=,4 7.~-2
(
(
(:)
(.
.-.
j.-.
7 4 1 5 . '.
74(:)91:)
.;
7 4 5:::
Page
Page185
60 of
of111
523
Page 60 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
1
N.
1-1.
F'.
I:!.
F'AYROLL :!;ERVIC:E
NI::;~::ELLANEI:II-I:::
CITHEK
OTHEFi
OTHER
WA IVELI )
I
I
I
II
I
4.
II
aI
1I
I
4
----------------:------------:---------------:-------------I
TOTAL IN:SI-IF(ANCE/TAX /L IC:ENSE/FEES:
.c
.--;1 1 -: .=:1 . :.
-I._
--------------------I------------:---------------:-------------I
I
20. GENERAL 1:lVERHEAD:

I
A.
F L A T C:HARGE
I
I
E.
C:CIHF'ORATE OVERHEAD EXPENSE
I
C.
CASTING O F F I C E S A L A R I E S
II
D. ENTERTAINMENT-EXECUTIVES
,
t
I
E.
TRAVEL EXPENSE-EXECUTIVES
I
I
F.
S F F I C E RENTAL AND EXPENSE/P MO I
F1. O F F I C E R E N T A L S / S U P P L I E S / P WK
:
G. AUDITClR
I
H. T IMEKEEPER
I
I. SECRETAKI ES
8
I
.-I.
P U B L Ii: R E L A T I O N S HEAD
I
1::.
P U B L I C R E L A T I O N S SECRETARY
I
I
L.
LEGAL FEES ( P / H R )
I
M.
FOSTAGE/TELEPHONE/P W E
I
N.
CIJST1:lMS
BROKERAGE
I
I
O.
GENERAL OFF I C E OVERHEAD
eI
P.
F I L M SHIPPING
a
I
T.
OTHER
a
I
1-1.
OTHER
0I
V.
ClTHER
I
I
I
I
I
.;
TOTAL GENERAL OVERHEAD:
I
I
1I
-----------------------------------,------------:---------------:--------------21.
A.
FINANCE
S ROE I
I
I
I
I
C.
n.
Cl~lMPLETI O N Bi:lNu-Nl:l
CONT 1NGENCY
CLAIMS
I
I
I
I
I
-<.:.
C"
,1(I(:)
&
I
I
.05:
4 0(1)0 000 (10 :
.a2751
4000000. 00 :
.c)275:(4(~[~o[:)[:)(:).i)~:))
:
:33/.7.5[:)
00
2.:
.l:
I
.O
-----------------------------------:------------:---------------;--------------
206 :)00.
(I(
1 1 )(IC)C). (11,
.o(
33/-.75[:).
2:
-----------------------------------o------------:---------------:--------------.
GRAND TOTAL BELOW THE L I N E
I
I
I(:) 11(-).529;
__------------------------------------___-----------------------------------/ '7
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page186
61 of
of111
523
Page 61 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
May 21, 1987
Stan Caterbone
Financial Management Group
1755 Oregon Pike
Lancaster, Pa. 17601
Mr.
Dear Stan:
At your request I've investigated the requirements of the Completion Bond.
Bert Schneiderman of Worldwide Completion Services in New York
has given me a figure of 5+%, excluding contingencies, with a
50% No Claims Bonus. Since Bert also owns BonBon Payroll Service
he has agreed to waive the payroll fee if we use their bonding
service,
Requirements: They need copies of the budget and/or production
board, resumes for the director and producers as well as copies
of their contracts and any other production agreements which
have been completed.
Further they need to know when we will commence principal photography, editing location and if we intend to have a distribution
deal up front.
I spoke to Jerry Vandersonde and Bill Hudson of DeWitt Stern Insurance in Los Angeles, who were recommended by Worldwide. Since
I couldn't show him a budget or a script we did some educated
guessing and came up with a figure of approximately $75,000. The
Production Package policy should include: General liability, cast
insurance, negative film, faulty stock and camera processing,
props, sets, wardrobe, rented equipment, extra expenses, third
party property damage, non-owned auto, Errors and Ommissions
including a one year bond and a minimum workmen's comp policy
for anything that is not covered by workmen's comp.
I understand you're going to Wildwood this weekend. We need to

house a crew of about 60-80, production offices, catering service.
We'd like to get as many free extras as possible and need high
quality promo type giveaways. For screen credit, of course. If
you have any such contact we'll need mutant dolls (500?) and if
you can h ~ l pbrinq dow? lor~'<cn costs that would be great. I'm
tzikrng about beaches, aricsezents, the pier, parking facilities.
p:-ob~L
p k r SCII
TY
-3
h?~?!'=
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
f5=* 1
Page
Page187
62 of
of111
523
Page 62 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
FLAT
M s . E l l e n Libman
Power S t a t i o n , I n c .
4 4 1 b7est 53rd S t r e e t
New York, N.Y. 10019
Dear E l l e n :
B a r b a r a a n d I h a v e mapped o u t a s k e l e t o n s c h e d u l e f o r o u r t r i p
t o N e w York a n d I t h o u g h t I ' d s e n d i t o f f a n d see i f i t w o r k s
f o r e v e r y o n e e l s e . By t h e way, w e ' v e d e c i d e d t o s t a y i n N e w
York u n t i l T u e s d a y i n s t e a d o f Monday a s o r i g i n a l l y p l a n n e d .
Thursday
A r r i v e a b o u t 3:OOPM. You h a v e t h e e x a c t t i m e
s i n c e y o u ' v e booked o u r f l i g h t s .
Please let
u s know i f someone w i l l p i c k u s u p o r i f w e
should take a t a x i .
W e ' l l come t o Power S t a t i o n a n ? g i v e y o u a n d
Tony c o p i e s o f t h e s c r i p t a n d b u d g e t w h i c h w e ' d
l i k e you t o r e a d Thursday n i g h t .
B a r b a r a a n d I h a v e a d i n n e r m e e t i n g w i t h a Direct o r of Photography.
Friday
Leave f o r New J e r s e y i n t h e morning. D i s c u s s

s c r i p t and budget.
Meet Mayor o f Wildwood and b r i n g him a s y n o p s i s
o f s c r i p t which h e h a s r e q u e s t e d .
Meet w i t h S t e v e G a r e l i c k , t h e P r o d u c t i o n C o o r d i n h t o r o f t h e N e w J e r s e y F i l m Commission.
Look a t l o c a t i o n s .
Saturday
Sunday
S t a n C a t e r b o n e a r r i v e s i n N e w J e r s e y . Meet t h e
r e p from Maury's P i e r t o d i s c u s s l o c a t i o n costs.
Check o u t h o t e l s f o r c r e w a n d c a s t .
Monday
L a s t m i n u t e S e t a i l s i n New J e r s e y .
L e a v e f o r Mew York a r o u n d n o o n .
M e e t i n g s a t Power S t a t i o n f o r f i n a l d i s c u s s i o n s
about s c r i p t , budget, contracts, etc.
Tuesday
Tuesday A f t e r n o o n
L e a v e N e w York a p p r o x i m a t e l y 4 F Y t o a r r i v e
L o s A n g e l e s a b o u t 9PM.
I ' l l t a l k t o you a g a i n b e f o r e w e l e a v e
i n planning your schedules.
4334 STERN M..SHERMArd OAKS. C A 91
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
Group
Litigation
First
Valuation
Digital
Page
Page
63 of
of111
523
cc: S t a n C a t e r b o n eMovie
(616) 188
905-3C;7
arbara
ADVANCED MEDIA B
GROUP
Peters
Page 63 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
FIATBUSH
F LMS,NC.
M s . Ellen Libmn
Power Station, Inc.

441 West 53rd Street
NAJ York, N.Y. 10019

D e a r Ellen:
Let's t r y it again. This time we are scheduled to leave Los Angeles

on Thursdzy, 3~124 =id r2tu.m t3 L3s Arigsles cii T~esZa-;., 2.,z?e 9. 3.e
f o l l m h g is a rough schedule.
Arrive a b u t 3:OOPM. Please l e t us know the exact
f l i g h t information as soon as possible so we can
arrange aAprt t r a n s p r t a t i o n here. L e t us h o w
if sa-neone will pick us up in New York o r if we
should arrarge t r a m p r t a t i o n to Power Station.
Also l e t m e krvJw what hotel we w i l l be booked a t
in New York so we can leave that information here.
We'll ccrne to Power Station for any discussion
r e g a r m the s c r i p t and/or budget.
Barbara and I have a dinner meeting with a D i r e c t o r

of Photography.
Friday
Leave for New Jersey in the ~mrning. Meet with

Steve Gorelick, the Production Coordinator of the
New Jersey Film Carmission. Look a t locations.
Saturday
Stan C a t e r b n e arrives in New Jersey. Meet the rep

r a n Maury's Pier t o discuss location costs.
Check out hotels for crew ard cast.
Iast minute d e t a i l s in New Jersey.
Ieave f o r New York a m u d m n .

Meetings a t P a e r Station f o r final discussions
about script, budget, m t r a c t s , etc.
Additional meetins in mrning i f necessary.
W v e New York appr-tely
4R.I to arrive Los
Angeles about 9R1.
Please l e t m hxx if y m have any additions o r changes. I ' l l probably
talk t o w u again on Wrday.
wards,
cc: S t a n Caterb31le
Barbara Peters
Arlene
4334 STERN AVE., SHERMAN OAKS.CA 91423

Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page189
64 of
of111
523
(818) 995-3417
Page 64 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
FLATBUSH
F IMS,NCl
J u n e 1 2 , 1987
Mr. Stan Caterbone

1755 Oregon Pike
Lancaster Pa. 1 7 6 0 1
Dear Stan:
As you requested here's a schedule for Project 4 4 1 (mrking t i t l e ) :

PFE-PrnCrION
June 28-Julv 11, 1987

July 12-Sep't 5 , . 1987
New York
New Jersey
8weeks
New Jersey
8 5 day weeks
POSFPRODUCTION
Nwenber 1-January 30,1988
New York
In order to s t i l l g e t the film made this season we've got to speed everythug
W e originally planned four weeks of pre-production in New York lxlt that's
rn longer possible. If we start June 28 we've got only ten weeks to g e t t h e
mutant effects going a d then w e ' l l have to schedule mutant scenes later in
up.
the film i f they aren' t ready.

This schedule also takes us to October 31 f o r the end of the shoot, which means
we've got to schedule exteriors f i r s t , leaving the i n t e r i o r s f o r later in the
w e n t of bad weather.
S i x e we're on such a t i g h t schedule I can't r e a l l y break down the costs f o r
you because it w i l l a l l start h a p p n h g so quickly. W e ' l l imnediately have a
New York office, per dim, btel and coneacted fees f o r Barbara and myself.
W e ' ll h i r e a casting director, production manager, p r d u c t i o n coordinator ard
location manager, g e t the mutant e f f e c t s started a d begin hiring key personnel.
I f p check the m e t you'll see the actual number of weeks of employrent
f o r new. There w i l l be legal fees f o r pcepariq contracts. Wing those tm
weeks we' ll hopefully do mst of the casting.
4334 STERN A N . , SHERMAN OAKS. CA 91423

Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page
65
of
of111
523
(818)190
995-3417
Page 65 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
IXlring the eight weeks of pre-production in N e w Jersey w e ' l l be m r m

with the art director, costane designer, s e t decorator, building s e t s ,
tying d m locations, e t c
A week before shooting the f u l l crw w i l l be prepping. The editor w i l l

a r r i v e a t about t h a t lime and w i l l be mrlung on a rough cut during the
entire shooting period.
A t the close of production Barbara, the editor an3 I w i l l m e back to
New York f o r a three m n t h editing period a t the en3 of which we will
deliver the finished film, includmg d i s t r i b u t o r ' s requirements an3 the
MPAA rating.
As you can see this w i l l be very tricky but I s t i l l think we can do it

i f Barbara ard I are in New York no l a t e r than June 28.
Hope this helps.
cc: Tony Bongiovi

Barbara P e t e r s
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page191
66 of
of111
523
Page 66 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advisory, Inc.
r
C-
11. 7755 Oregon Pike
Laocaster, PA 17607
777-569-4100
ftYAWCUI N A N I C r M t U I U O U P LID
PRESIDENT
May 29, 1987
Mr. Joel ~oidhammer

Sidel, Gonda, Goldhammer, Abbott
2 Penn Center
Suite 1800
Philadelphia, PA 19102
Dear Joel:
I received the enclosed correspondence regarding Power Station

I have yet to have a chance to review this, however,
Studio.
I thought it might be helpful.
Please keep all of this on
file as confidential and please do not make any communications
with anyone until I learn more about the situation.
Power Station does not know that I have you working on this
yet.
Good Luck.
a
Sincerely,
Stanley J. Caterbone
SJC:lmk
CC
encl
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page192
67 of
of111
523
Page 67 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
w-
L A W O f FICES
--L
SEIDEL,G O NDA, GOLDHAMMER& ABBOTT,P. C.

PATENT A N D T R A D E M A R K A T T O R N E Y S
S U I T E 1800 TWO P E N N C E N T E R
PLAZA
P H I L A D E L P H I A . PA. 19102
ARTHUR
TELEPHONE:(PIB) 5 6 8 - 8 3 8 3
H. SEIOEL
J O E L S. GOLDHAMMER
MICHAEL P. ABBOTT
2 5 J u n e 1987
TELEX: 8 4 5 - 2 1 6
C A B L E : SIPAT
T E L E C O P I E R . ( P I S I 568- 5 5 4 9
GREGORY J. LAVORGNA
G R O U P I , I 1 6 111
DANIEL A. MONACO
R O 9 E R T H. HAMMER Ill
EDWARD C . GONOA
THOMAS J. DURLING
(1930- 1985)
STEPHEN J . MEYERS
AMANDA L A U R A N Y E *
OF COUNSEL
SYLVIA A. G O S Z T O N Y I
STANLEY H. Z E Y H E R
NANCY A. R U 9 N E R
SCOTT J . FIELDS
* D C 6 NY BARS ONLY
M r . Stanley Caterbone
FMG A d v i s o r y , I n c .
Eden P a r k I1
1 7 5 5 O r e g o n Avenue
L a n c a s t e r , PA 1 7 6 0 1
RE:
Power S t a t i o n
Our F i l e :
7351-G
Dear Stan:
C
I h a v e now r e c e i v e d t h e r e s u l t s o f a s e a r c h
I have a l s o reviewed t h e f i l e
p e r t a i n i n g t o t h e above s u b j e c t .
f o r w a r d e d w i t h y o u r l e t t e r o f May 2 9 .
T h e f o l l o w i n g i s my
a n a l y s i s and e v a l u a t i o n o f t h e r i g h t t o u s e "Power S t a t i o n " a s
d e f i n e d below.
As I understand the situation, your business c l i e n t ,
Power < t a t i o n S t u d i o , h a s , s i n c e 1 9 7 7 , o p e r a t e d a r e c o r d i n g
s t u d i o with a widely regarded reputation f o r providing high
The
q u a l i t y recording s e r v i c e s using s t a t e of t h e a r t equipment.
e n c l o s e d r e p o r t r e v e a l s t h a t Power S t a t i o n s t u d i o h a s r e g i s t e r e d
t h e t r a d e m a r k "Power S t a t i o n " f o r sound r e c o r d i n g s t u d i o s .
(See
You h a v e a s k e d m e
Reg. No. 1 , 4 3 3 , 3 2 8 r e g i s t e r e d March 1 7 , 1 9 8 7 . )
t o i n v e s t i g a t e t h e p o s s i b i l i t y o f Power S t a t i o n e x p a n d i n g t h e u s e
o f i t s mark i n t o m e n ' s a n d women's c l o t h i n g i n c l u d i n g b e a c h w e a r ;
and f o r audio and video e l e c t r o n i c s f o r consumers and
I have assumed t h a t t h i s l a t t e r c a t e g o r y i n c l u d e s
professionals.
radios, television receivers, video c a s s e t t e recorders, a u d i o
r e c o r d e r s , compact d i s c players, turn tables, amplifiers,
r e c e i v e r s , t u n e r s , c o n t r o l p a n e l s , mixing b o a r d s a n d c o n s o l e s ,
among o t h e r t h i n g s .
B a s e d u p o n t h e r e s u l t s o f t h e e n c l o s e d s e a r c h , i t is
my o p i n i o n t h a t i t w o u l d b e i n a d v i s a b l e f o r Power S t a t i o n , I n c .
t o u s e i t s m a r k f o r c l o t h i n g a s a f o r e s a i d . T h e b a s i s f o r my
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page193
68 of
of111
523
Page 68 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
25 J u n e 1987
~A
Mr.
S t a n l e y Caterbone
o p i n i o n i s R e g i s t r a t i o n No. 1 , 4 3 1 , 2 4 2 r e g i s t e r e d M a r c h 3 , 1 9 8 7
f o r "Power S t a t i o n " .
The r e g i s t r a n t c l a i m s a f i r s t d a t e o f u s e
of A p r i l 3 , 1986 f o r women's c l o t h i n g i n c l u d i n g swimwear a n d
o t h e r goods as l i s t e d .
A l t h o u g h y o u r c l i e n t h a s a s t r o n g r e p u t a t i o n , and
a l t h o u g h i t h a s p r i o r i t y of use f o r t h e mark, t h i s r e g i s t r a n t h a s
a s t r o n g p o s i t i o n f o r arguing t h a t it has superior r i g h t s f o r
women's c l o t h i n g .
One w o u l d n o t o r d i n a r i l y a s s o c i a t e c l o t h i n g i n
a n y way w i t h r e c o r d i n g s t u d i o s e r v i c e s .
Thus, your c l i e n t ' s
r i g h t s i n i t s mark d o n o t a p p e a r t o d o m i n a t e t h o s e o f t h e
registrant's.
A c c o r d i n g l y , u s e o f t h e Power S t a t i o n m a r k f o r
women's ( o r m e n ' s ) c l o t h i n g w o u l d i n v o l v e a s i g n i f i c a n t r i s k o f
being accused of trademark infringement.
Use o f t h e P o w e r S t a t i o n m a r k f o r c o n s u m e r a n d
p r o f e s s i o n a l a u d i o a n d v i s u a l e l e c t r o n i c e q u i p m e n t r a i s e s some
i s s u e s , b u t o n t h e w h o l e I am o f t h e o p i n i o n t h a t i t i s
permissible.
Again, I assume, a s I have been informed, t h a t t h e
Power S t a t i o n s t u d i o i s w e l l known a n d d o e s h a v e a g o o d
G i v e n t h a t , i t s movement
r e p u t a t i o n f o r its e x i s t i n g s e r v i c e s .
Here t h e g o o d
i n t o e l e c t r o n i c equipment s h o u l d be p e r m i s s i b l e .
w i l l a s s o c i a t e d w i t h i t s c u r r e n t s e r v i c e s c a n b e more r e a d i l y
extended to audio v i s u a l e l e c t r o n i c equipment.
T h e s e a r c h r e v e a l s t h a t M a n v i l l e C o r p o r a t i o n ' s Ken
C a r y l R a n c h i s t h e o w n e r o f t h e mark " P o w e r S t a t i o n " f o r b a t t e r y
o p e r a t e d emergency e l e c t r i c a l power s u p p l y u n i t s .
S e e Reg. N o .
1 , 0 4 0 , 3 9 8 r e g i s t e r e d May 2 5 , 1 9 7 6 a n d c l a i m i n g a f i r s t d a t e o f
u s e o f November 2 3 , 1 9 7 0 .
I n my o p i n i o n , a u d i o v i s u a l e l e c t r o n i c
equipment c a n be c o n s i d e r e d to be s u f f i c i e n t l y u n r e l a t e d t o
emergency e l e c t r i c a l power s u p p l y u n i t s t o a v o i d a l i k e l i h o o d o f
c o n f u s i o n even though t h e marks a r e i d e n t i c a l .
I r e a c h t h e same c o n c l u s i o n
a p p l i c a t i o n by E l e c t r i c a l C o n d u c t o r s , I n c .
power s t r i p .
r e g a r d i n g t h e pending
for a multiple outlet
A c l o s e r q u e s t i o n is r a i s e d b y G o u l d ' s S u p p l e m e n t a l
R e g i s t e r r e g i s t r a t i o n f o r Power S t a t i o n f o r m i n i a n d
microcomputers.
G o u l d ' s mark i s r e g i s t e r e d o n t h e S u p p l e m e n t a l
R e g i s t e r u n d o u b t e d l y b e c a u s e "Power S t a t i o n " a s a p p l i e d t o
computer equipment is considered to b e d e s c r i p t i v e .
A
Supplemental R e g i s t e r r e g i s t r a t i o n h a s none o f t h e p r o c e d u r a l
Moreover, i f
benefits of a Principle Register registration.
G o u l d ' s u s e of t h e m a r k is l i m i t e d t o a p a r t i c u l a r m a r k e t w h i c h
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page194
69 of
of111
523
Page 69 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Mr.
25 J u n e 1987
Stanley Caterbone
is d i s t i n c t f r o m y o u r c l i e n t s , t h e r e d o e s n o t a p p e a r t o b e a
likelihood of confusion.
T h u s , G o u l d may b e s e l l i n g i t s
computers i n t o a s p e c i a l i z e d commercial market i f i t is p r e s e n t l y
s e l l i n g computers a t a l l .
Next I c a l l y o u r a t t e n t i o n t o t h e f a c t t h a t s e v e r a l
r a d i o s t a t i o n s have a d o p t e d and a r e u s i n g t h e t r a d e m a r k "The
Power S t a t i o n " i n various c i t i e s throughout t h e United S t a t e s .
Conceivably, t h e s e radi'o s t a t i o n s c o u l d o b j e c t t o t h e
i n t r o d u c t i o n o f consumer e l e c t r o n i c s i n t o t h e i r m a r k e t a r e a on
t h e g r o u n d t h a t t h e u s e o f t h e s a m e mark i m p l i e s s p o n s o r s h i p b y
I n o t e t h a t a l l o f t h e s e m a r k s were r e c e n t l y r e g i s t e r e d ,
them.
and I s u s p e c t t h a t a l l of t h e s e r a d i o s t a t i o n s are r e l a t e d or
c o m m o n l y owned.
I a l s o s u s p e c t t h a t t h e a d o p t i o n o f t h i s ark
may b e o f r e c e n t v i n t a g e .
Thus, your c l i e n t i n a n y n e g o t i a t i o n
w i t h t h e s e p e o p l e would h a v e t h e a d v a n t a g e o f b e i n g a p r i o r u s e r ,
and t h e r e l a t i o n s h i p between r e c o r d i n g s e r v i c e s a n d e l e c t r o n i c
e q u i p m e n t o n t h e one hand and r a d i o s t a t i o n s e r v i c e s and
e l e c t r o n i c equipment on t h e o t h e r hand is a t l e a s t c o - e q u a l .
Thus, y o u r c l i e n t should have t h e dominant p o s i t i o n .
I n v i e w o f t h e f o r e g o i n g , i t i s my o p i n i o n t h a t T h e
Power S t a t i o n s h o u l d n o t a d o p t o r u s e "Power S t a t i o n " f o r men's
a n d w o m e n ' s c l o t h i n g , b u t i t may a d o p t a n d u s e t h e m a r k f o r
p r o f e s s i o n a l and consumer e l e c t r o n i c s a s d e s c r i b e d above w i t h t h e
u n d e r s t a n d i n g t h a t t h e m a t t e r is n o t e n t i r e l y w i t h o u t d o u b t a n d
issues could arise.
I t i s , h o w e v e r , my o p i n i o n , b a s e d u p o n t h e
f a c t s p r e s e n t l y a v a i l a b l e to me, t h a t The Power S t a t i o n , I n c .
should p r e v a i l i f those issues a r i s e .
I f you have any q u e s t i o n s c o n c e r n i n g
p l e a s e f e e l f r e e to c a l l me.
the foregoing,
With k i n d e s t p e r s o n a l r e g a r d s ,
Sincerely yours,
SEIDEL GONDA, GOLDHAMMER
& ABBOTT, P. C.
JOEL S . GOLDHAMMER
JSG:mp
Encl.
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page195
70 of
of111
523
Page 70 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
JOINT Vf%TUilE PAKTICIPATICft AND CQflMBUTIQU
The u n d e r s i g n e d , i n t e n d i n g to be l e g a l l y bound, i n c o n s i d e r a t i o n o f h i s
adInissim as a p a r t i c i p a n t in the j o i n t v e n t u r e t o be known as "PWER PRO-
DUCTIONS I" an3 r e c e i p t o f a profit/loss d i s t r i b u t i o n s h a r e of
of
such j o i n t venture, hereby d e c l a r e s ard aclcmwledges h i s i n t e n t to participate

i n such j o i n t v e n t u r e and hereby covenants and a g r e e s to a n t r i b u t e t h e sun of
to t h e c a p i t a l o f such j o i n t venture, which sum s h a l l c o n s t i t u t e
h i s i n i t i d c a p i t a l account i n such j o i n t venture.
T h i s L e t t e r of I n t e n t is e n t e r e d i n t o by t h e u n d e r s i g n e d upon t h e
following general under stand ing :
Power P r o d u c t i o n s I w i l l be a j o i n t v e n t u r e t o be
formed u n d e r t h e l a w s of P e n n s y l v a n i a , h a v i n g t h e
.,
s p e c i f i c purpse t o i n v e s t (loan) its funds t o MUTANIA
PRODUCTIONS,
INC.
to
finance
production o f a motion p i c t u r e .
such c o r p o r a t i o n ' s
The j o i n t v e n t u r e
s h a l l r e c e i v e f u l l repayment o f i t s i n v e s t m e n t from
MUTAXIA PRODUCTIONS, I N C . b e f o r e the d i s t r i b u t i o n o f
any p r o f i t s to any party. T h e r e a f t e r , t h e j o i n t v e n t u r e
s h a l l r e c e i v e 50% o f t h e p r o f i t s from s u c h m o t i o n
p i c t u r e , o f which 85% s h a l l be d i s t r i b u t e d t o t h e
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page196
71 of
of111
523
Page 71 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
mn-managing
joint v e n t u r e r s
i n c l u d i n g t h e under-
s i g n e z ) and 15% s h a l l be d i s t r i b u t e d t o S t a n l e y J.
C a t e r b o n e a s t h e Eanaging J o i n t V e n t u r e r o f Power
P r o d u c t i o n s I. Tbe j o i n t v e n t u r e s h a l l have a r i g h t o f
f i r s t r e f u s a l to finance t h e next movie p r o d u c t i o n o f
MUTANIA PRWKTIONS,
INC. and/or ' I W Y BONGIOVI
Tfte ckdersigned qrees t h a t he w i l l execute and d e l i v e r a counterc o u n t e r p a r t o f t h e j o i n t v e n t u r e agreement (which s h a l l be c o n s i s t e n t with the
a b o v e g e n e r a l u n d e r s t a n d i n g ) and t h a t h e w i l l execute and del'iver dl docunents required f a r t h e j o i n t venture to elect not to be t a x e d a s a p a r t n e r ship.
Contemporaneous w i t h t h e execution o f t h i s Letter o f I n t e n t , the undersigned is cmntributing 10% o f h i s total agreed c o n t r i b u t i o n , or $
r-3
w i t h i n f i f t e e n ( 1 5 ) days f r a n t h e d a t e hereof, time being o f t h e essence, t h e

-
undersigned s h a l l m n t r i b u t e t h e 90% balance, or $
Such c o n t r i-
b u t i o n s h a l l b e h e l d by S t a n l e y J. Caterbone a t i n t e r e s t , pending campletion
of alL n e g o t i a t i o n s ard execution ard d e l i v e r y of iii documents w i t h MuTA~IA

PRODUCTIa~S, INC.
I f s u c h n e g o t i a t i o n s , d e l i v e r y , and execution are mt m ~ l e t e dw i t h i n

t h i r t y (30) days a f t e r the f u l l c o n t r i b u t i o n is made, the e n t i r e c o n t r i b u t i o n ,
w i t h all i n t e r e s t earned thereon, s h a l l be returned to t h e d e r s i g n e d without
demand.
S t a n l e y J. Caterbone s h a l l ' be r e s p o n s i b l e f o r c o l l e c t i o n , receipt,
i n t e r i m i n v e s t m e n t and management, and u l t i m a t e investment or r e t u r n of a l l

f d s m t r i b u t e d , and s h a l l be t h e Managing J o i n t V e n t u r e r o f t h e j o i n t
venture.
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page197
72 of
of111
523
Page 72 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
The u n d e r s i g n e d h e r e b y a u t h o r i z e s and anpokers S t a n l e y J. Caterbone to

n e g o t i a t e , execute, and d e l i v e r a l l d o c u m e n t s n e c e s s a r y or r e q u i r e d t o
implement t h e j o i n t v e n t u r e p u r p s e and to t a k e all other a c t i o n s an3 n q o t i a t e , execute and d e l i v e r a l l o t h e r d o c u m e n t s n e c e s s a r y
or d e s i r a b l e t o
implement or e f f e c t u a t e t h e j o i n t v e n t u r e pnpose.
SIGN
( L . S . ) Date: May
NAME:
,1987
NAME:
ADDRESS:
CITY:
STATE:
ZIP:
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page198
73 of
of111
523
Page 73 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
RICHARD C. FOX, PC.

ATTQRNEYS AT LAW
1015 ROBERTj VALLEY ROAD
HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA inlo

RICHARD C FOX'
('ADMn'TED ALSO FLORIDA)
May 20,
1987
S t a n l e y J. C a t e r b o n e
Eden P a r k 11, 1755 Oregon ' p i k e
L a n c a s t e r , PA
17601
Mr.
For P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s rendered i n connection w i t h

Power P r o d u c t i o n s I , i n c l u d i n g c o n f e r e n c e , p r e p a r a t i o n o f
L e t t e r o f I n t e n t , a n d e x p r e s s m a i l i n g , .and f o l l o w - u p t e l e p h o n e
check.
P r o f e s s i o n a l Fee
8
UdP.S.
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page199
74 of
of111
523
Page 74 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Ted Gotnillion, President
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie Page
Page200
75 of
of111
523
Page 75 of 76
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
05.03.2007
Anti-Trust Litigation v. Lancaster City Police Department
Gomillion: mini-major in the heart of Hollywood

O N F OF; the rtlo\r inlereclirlg
<iomillron also cpent time on

\ u c h T V \eriec as "fhe
Monroes". "Follow The Sun",
and "Jessie James".
Ted Gomillion wac the firct to
develop a mobile sound stlldio, a
\I\I~IOS.
prov~de\otle o l the mort techr~o(;omillron production chief specla1 trarler urlrt that 15
logically ad~anccdcourid \\age\
Adan1 (buck added tliar, " A l l equipped to project "dailies"
alorig with a 46-IIIIII
burldrng
they hare to do IS L.ortle in wrth a and provide orr-locatior~"loopcontalnrng officec and editing
scrrpt and they can *alk out o f rng".
\uites
"Our
unrque units hare
here wrth a lir~rshedproduction.
The sound stage hac a 45-footWe have done w o r k l o r proven to be a ver) valuable aceet
wide. floor-to-ceilrng \creen.
arid
have
become a lucrati\e
cotnpaniec l'rorti all around the
ceare 150 people and i e one o l the
\ard
world, I t a l y , Mexico. The \ o u r c e o f revenue."
few re-recording ctagec arourid
Philrppinet. the UK and rtlany (iomillior~,who offered that the
the world that 1s capahle o f
units habe been ured or1 Tiltnc
tnore."
handling any type o f f i l m
Ciomillion al\o taid. "LVc rake such as Sam Peckinpah'c "Jr
format. including 70mrn six"Get-Away";
great prrde 111 our wtirk. R o n n e r " ;
track discreet. or video.
e\pec~allvnur looprr~gfacrlity lor ( i t ) l d u y ~ l ' \ " ( i r a \ \ t i o p p e r " .
C o r ~ ~ p l e n ~ e r ~the
t r r ~ g\ophr\tr"The Cir~ccon~
(;ango; Harhrn
foreign lilrnc."
cated projection sy\teni 15 an
(iornillion'c experience in the Strercand'c "The blaln E \ e r ~ t " :
equally advanced cout~d and
1 ate r h e I i e r o " ;
film industry cpanc 3 0 years a r ~ d " T o o
dubbing syctem which provides r t ~ c l u d e s e x p e r i e n c e
"Grizzly Adarns" arid "Tom
111
flexibilitv and extremely accurate
product ron and post -production Horn". The round units have
reproductron for re-recording or
also
been used by such television
at hl(;M. Drcney. rodd A - 0 .
playback o f anv eound format.
C'olu~tihia. Warner. lInlrer5al. shows as "Canney
. & Lacev" and
"C'hipc"
Paramout~t and 20th ('enturq
The (joniillion Studioe facrlrFox.
"We provide e\ery \errice.
The executi\c filni-milker tles are SO coniplete that each 01
frorii pre-production. cound spent seven years at the Fox r r c prc>ductronollicec can he (u\t
stage connectlone, location Studior, earned t w o Peahody about uced to live In while
\I~c>oting and
all
p o \ t - Award\ for excellence, and was production i c in progress. kach I \
production. I n other words, we rnvolved with such notable equ~ppedu i t h a hart1 and kitchen
prorrde all cervicec and facilitiec productions as "Rally Round area and there ic also R rectarrratlt
as the major jtud~oc around The Flag Pole". "State 1-arr".
and
catering
f~~cilr
town, hut at 3 fractiori o f the "let's blake Lore". " F l a ~ i i ~ n g Addit~onally, a \ n u l l exerchc
room complete u r t h rauna.
co\t. That's why we corned the Star" and "Way Way Out ".
By Ron Krueger
"\tarc~ol-the-art" facrlit~es in
lioll!uood IS rlie (;ornrllron
St~rdro\,Ireaded h \ lilrn ~ r ~ t l u r t r !
phrase ' n ~ i n i - r n a j o r ' . " \ard
veterarl Ted (iomrllion.
Gon~rllron rn d c t c r ~ h i n g his
The cry-hurlding cortiplex
Advanced Media Group First Digital Movie

Page 76 of 111
Page 76 of 76
Page 201 of 523
weightr and jacurr~ ts a\ailahle

lo production execirtl\es u o r k ~ r ~ g
long hours.
-<iornillion own5 all of II\
burldrngc and tand, uhlch are o n
McC'adden Place In Ilollyuood
w ~ t h ~ an short distance from
nlarl) nlajor labc, sound stagec.
Set
and c o \ t u m e rerltal
companies and an excellent breu
o f the world famou\ "t4ollymood" cigr~which trtr in a \lately
poeirron high in the tlolly\rood
Hill\.
The latect connection thar
entrepreneur (i01111111011 ha\ jet
up to round out hi\ lacllit) I\
called I'oct I'ro ( oriiplerror~ IIIL.,
*I11ct1 I\ 21 l r r l ~ l r l ~ l r kl g
lllll ~~llll\
v.III gi\c u\ a conlpic~c;Irrarlperllerlt
Good investment
"Any film\ that hake had
major filming completed and u e
feel that there i c a eood investnient, our new financial agrecmetlt will give Ciomillion the
opportunity o f linichrng the
caid
post-production."
Gomillion.
"We \\rII ccir~lrr~rrc
to cxpar~ll
and add Inore properr\, hrrt ;]I
rhe moment. ire oller O I I ~ ot the
ir~
~I v
. c r t '~IIII~I-\IIIL~I~I\'ITI the
hu\ine\\ and rrght III the r ~ l ~ ~ i d l e
01 Clollvwood."
Wednesday October 5, 2016

05.03.2007
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page202
77 of
of111
523
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page203
78 of
of111
523
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page204
79 of
of111
523
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page205
80 of
of111
523
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page206
81 of
of111
523
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page207
82 of
of111
523
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page208
83 of
of111
523
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page209
84 of
of111
523
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page210
85 of
of111
523
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page211
86 of
of111
523
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page212
87 of
of111
523
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page213
88 of
of111
523
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page214
89 of
of111
523
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page215
90 of
of111
523
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page216
91 of
of111
523
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page217
92 of
of111
523
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page218
93 of
of111
523
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page219
94 of
of111
523
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page220
95 of
of111
523
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page221
96 of
of111
523
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page222
97 of
of111
523
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page223
98 of
of111
523
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page
Page224
99 of
of111
523
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page 225
100 of 523
111
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page 226
101 of 523
111
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page 227
102 of 523
111
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page 228
103 of 523
111
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page 229
104 of 523
111
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page 230
105 of 523
111
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page 231
106 of 523
111
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page 232
107 of 523
111
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page 233
108 of 523
111
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page 234
109 of 523
111
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
U.S. District
Anti-Trust
CourtLitigation
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. Lancaster City
v. United
Police
States,
Department
et.al.,
Advanced
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media Group
Litigation
FirstValuation
Digital Movie
Page 235
110 of 523
111
Tuesday
Wednesday
December
October27,
5, 2016
Bongiovi Acoustics Unveils Digital Power Station Car Radio
http://www.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=cpt&title=Bongiovi+Acoustics+Unveils+Di...
Anti-Trust Litigation v. Lancaster City Police Department
Learn Audio Production - www.FullSail.com

Study audio recording and mixing in Full Sail's professional studios
Sponsored Links
Music Producing Tutorials - www.MusicProducerPro.com

Produce Sick Beats Instantly Start Making Music Now! $29.99
Powered by
SAVE THIS | EMAIL THIS | Close
Bongiovi Acoustics Unveils Digital Power Station Car Radio

By David Weiss
Jan 5, 2007 4:33 PM
The worlds of pro audio and consumer electronics were bridged at New York City's Avatar Studios in December, where Bongiovi
Acoustics unveiled the Digital Power Station car radio. Demonstrated by audio icon Tony Bongiovi (pictured) in Avatars Studio A,
the patent-pending technology being manufactured by JVC made a very impressive debut.
According to Bongiovi Acoustics, the Digital Power Station, embedded in a computer chip, is the first of a new generation of digital
audio signal processors that can be programmed to reproduce studio quality sound in virtually any audio device. Using a
combination of filters, EQ and gain amplification, it achieves total linear control over the entire audio spectrum, allowing
frequency-specific amplification to achieve desired results in the playback environment.
So how does it sound? If the demo in the Ford Focus that rolled into Studio A is any indication, excellent. Aimed first at lower- to
mid-priced car lines at an anticipated cost of $700 to $1,100 for the upgrade, the Digital Power Station should put much higher
quality sound within reach of the everyday driver.
Photo credit: David Weiss
For more information, visit www.digitalpowerstation.net.

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
2006 Prism Business Media Inc.
Find this article at:

http://www.mixonline.com/news/headline/bongiovi-digitalpowerstation-carradio-010507/index.html
SAVE THIS | EMAIL THIS | Close
Advanced Media Group First Digital Movie
Page 111 of 111
1 of 2
Wednesday October 5, 2016
1/11/2007 11:46 AM
Page 236 of 523

Stan J. Caterbone
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,

Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-669-2163
STATUTORY DECLARATION
The State of
Florida
)
) S.S.
County of St. Luie )

I, Tony Bongiovi, of Port St. Lucie, Florida, DO SOLEMNLY DECLARE THAT:
1. I, Tony Bongiovi of Bongiovi Acoustics, 649 SW Whitmore Drive, Port Saint Lucie, FL 34984,
former owner of Power Station Studios, New York City, New York, and owner of the full length
motion picture film project "Mutant Mania - The First Digital Movie , did collaborate with
Stan J. Caterbone, of Advanced Media Group, and former Executive and Founder of
Financial Management Group, Ltd., named Executive Producer, for the purpose of raising
$4,000.000 Million Dollars, and tasked with working with Flatbush Films (Marcie Silen, Arlene
Davidson, and Barbara Peters), of Hollywood, California to bring the project to fruition, including
but not limited to Distribution in both U.S. And Foreign Markets in Theaters and in Video Format.
All statements made are of my own knowledge and are true and that all statements made on
information and belief are believed to be true.
This STATUTORY DECLARATION is for the sole
purpose of procuring settlements and judgments in the civil actions of Stan J. Caterbone and
Advanced Media Group, by Stan J. Caterbone, pro se, which Tony Bongiovi is entitled to a
portion thereof.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on _____ day of
_____________, 20____.
NOTORAY ON FOLLOWING PAGE
Tony J.
Stan
Bongiovi
Caterbone
STATATORY
Litigation Valuation
DECLARATION
Page
Page
237
1 of 523
2
Wednesday
Tuesday December
November27,
2, 2016

NOTORY IS NOT REQUIRED BUT REQUESTED
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO
BEFORE ME, on the
_____ day of _____________, 20____
)
)
STAMP ON NEXT PAGE
)
_____________________________
_
______________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC
) Tony Bongiovi
My Commission expires:
_______________
2002-2016 LawDepot.com
Tony J.
Stan
Bongiovi
Caterbone
STATATORY
Litigation Valuation
DECLARATION
Page
Page
238
2 of 523
2
Wednesday
Tuesday December
November27,
2, 2016
U.S. District
16-4014 CATERBONE v. United
States, et.al.,
Page 1 ofCourt
45
02/16/2007
Institutional Investors of America, Inc.

Financing.Investments & Advisors
iUlan D. Dannsli
Managing General Parhler
January 20, 1987

HONORARY CHAIRMAN
Gm.s. Moon
,)
CHAIRLLINoFrnEmARD
* a d w. I-h
Mr. Stan Caterbone

1775 Oreqon Pipe
DIRECTORS
~~~~~.~
~
k.
v*. P&n(
k t x hB=+.NYC
*. I..
oyimy.
C u U
Fo-.
ur. A
CAYIW I-. co.

hrnbnvdca
F~-u.s.
40
Re:
Mortgage Loans
Commercial and Residential
Dear Stan:
&
"
.
.
"
A
Chi,"""
An- W..'"I
C*.
rO u i r m a n norpied
C-nth
d Arrri.
In reference to the above captioned subject, enclosed

please find a synopsis of our lending programs. We
are very interested in business in your part of the
Country. I will also be in a position to do some
other business with you through the bank we just
purchased in 60-90 days.
Very truly yours,
Allan D. Dannatt
President
ADD/slh
Enclosure

PageNo.
239 1
ofof
523
Page
45
777 North Eldridge Parkway. Suite 730

Houston. Texas 77079
U.S. District
States, et.al.,
Page 2 ofCourt
45
02/16/2007
LOAN HIFTFOLJO
aJFEimRA!iE~vrms
ma
10 yrs.
Variable
5 yrs.
7 yrs.
Fixed
Fixed
&
e
225 bp wer
03F o r 300 bp
wer 1 yr T- ill
Pay R a t e
Fee
Amortization
Stating
1-2 pts.
30 Y e a r s
1-2 pts.
1 3/4 pts.
30 Y e a r s
30 Y e a r s
@ 9%
9.5%
9.65%
Fived Rates a l s o available a t 325 basis pints wer c
o T-Bill
Retail, O f f i c e , Industrial
10 yrs.
Variable
5-7 yrs.
Fixed
Fixed
1oyrs.
300-350 bp wer
1 yr. T-Bill o r
250 bp wer 03F
1-2 pts.
30 Y e a r s
8.75%
9%
Par-1 pt.
Par-1 pt.
30 Y e a r s
30 Y e a r s
Similar terns available f o r m i n i wx&mses,

homes and ACLF f a c i l i t i e s .
Forwarrl,
available.
q,
open-ended
hotels, mobile home parks, nursing
and covered construction

Maxmm loan to value of 809.
loans are also
W e are a r n m t l y seeking t o plrchase $500 million in

Sale Leasebacks
p r q e r t i e s nationwide leased to nationally listed public corporations w i t h good
credit ratings. Leases r r p ~ s tbe NNN with a minimJm of a 10 year tenn. Mininnnn
cash h
t
$5-$500111.
REMICS
Beginning in the 2nd W X t e r of 1987, I I A will be placing $100 million
a m n t h into real estate investment mortgage conduits. Innn&iate urdbg lcans
w i l l be made on all types of I n s t i t u t i o n a l quality property.
Fates quoted are test available and m y vary depending on location and quality
of product.
1
PageNo.
240 2
ofof
523
Page
45
U.S. District
States, et.al.,
Page 3 ofCourt
45
02/16/2007
CYWTER BUSINESS PlAN
FDR
JULY 1. 1986
LWGBER. PA -TION
PageNo.
241 3
ofof
523
Page
45
U.S. Page
District
Court 16-4014 CATERBONE v. United
States, et.al.,
4 of 45
02/16/2007
Firrancia. Securities, Inc.
............... .?he Broker Dealer
Em Advisory, ........................
..The Registered Investment Advisor
.......The Insumme Agency

In=. .............?he Acamting Finn
Financial Savims Insurance Agemy

EM; Acmmting Sezvices,
Financial tbrtqages Services, Inc. ........?he

Wealth MaMgement Semi-,
..
..........The
Financial PlarPling &msultants, Inc. ......We
Mortgage Bmkmqe Firm
Portfolio MaMger
Financial Pla-
&
Market Timer
Finn
mmTE FmG (In Hause)

Eager Real Estate
........................Redl Estate Services
O'my ti smith .............................Legal
Counsel for Business
&
Xeal Estate
.........Legal cavrsel for Estate Planning

W e l l Associates, Inc. .................. .Property 6 Casualty Servicrs
Pro Financial harp, Inc. .................Servicc5 for Profe55ional Athletes
Shirk, Reist, Wagenseller
&
Shirk
Please note that the W e f i n s are currently wrler nqotiations and have given
ve.rhl amnnitment for affiliation.
PageNo.
242 4
ofof
523
Page
45
MICHAEL P. O'DAY
EDWARD H. SMITH
TIMOTHY A. UNUPage 5 of 45
243 NORTH DUKE STREET

LANUSTER, PA 17642
3934CQ1
U.S. District Court 16-4014 CATERBONE v. United

States, et.al.,
02/16/2007
805 WEST MAIN STREET
August 22, 1986
MOUNT JOY. PA 17552

U3-9131
1
Mr. Stanley J . Caterbone
F i n a n c i a l Management Croup, L t d .
1755 Oregon Pike
Lancaster, PA 17601
-I
- ---
~ r o f e s s i o n a ls e r v i c e s r e : F i n a n c i a l Management Group. L t d . . and

s u b s i d i a r y c o r p o r a t i o n s , including: ~ o n s u l t a t i o n sand advice;
preparation and f i l i n g of A r t i c l e s of Incorporation f o r F i n a n c i a l
Management Group, L t d . and nine s u b s i d i a r y c o r p o r a t i o n s ; prepar a t i o n and placement of l e g a l n o t i c e s .
Costs: 1 ) F i l i n g f e e s t o Corporation Bureau
nine c o r p o r a t i o n s a t $75 each '
$675 .OQ
2) Legal Notices ( s e e a t t a c h e d i n v o i c e s )
402.05
Financial
3 ) Corporation o u t f i t
76.32
Management Group, L t d .
4 ) Additional s t o c k c e r t i f i c a t e s
Finan45.76
c i a l Management Group, L t d .
T o t a l Costs
Total f e e s and c o s t s
Less c o s t s r e t a i n e r
Balance Due.
PageNo.
243 5
ofof
523
Page
45
U.S. District
States, et.al.,
Page 6 ofCourt
45
02/16/2007
OWEN KUGEL
39 NORTH MARKET STREET
LANCASTER PA 17603
717-299-4371
2 M a r c h 1987
To:
S t a n l e y J. Caterbone
President
E d e n P a r k II
1755 O r e g o n P i k e
Lancaster, - PA 17601
717-569-41 00
From :
Owen K u g e l
Subject:
M o r t g a g e Financing.
T h i s follows up o n o u r 17 F e b r u a r y meeting a b o u t 112ortgage

Financing f o r o u r upcoming development projects.
I h a v e selected a g r o u p o f 11 p r o j e c t s f o r w h i c h we h a v e completed
pre-development w o r k a n d w h i c h a r e r e a d y f o r d e b t placement;
a n d a t t a c h e d t h e c u r r e n t financial p r o j e c t i o n s o n each.
1 h a v e assumed a 65/35 D e b t l E q u i t y s p l i t , a 9.00% r a t e o f
interest, a 30 y e a r term, a n d a o n e p o i n t o r i g i n a t i o n fee. Note
t h a t t h e L o a n t v a l u e u s i n g a 9 " s a p R a t e averages 56.54%.
Note also t h a t 1 h a v e i n c l u d e d a 2.50% D e b t Placement Fee f o r
y o u r e f f o r t s in p l a c i n g t h i s debt; w h i c h w o u l d t o t a l $433,592
f o r t h e package.
L e t me k n o w if t h e r e i s i n t e r e s t and, if so, what a d d i t i o n a l
information y o u w i l l need.
Regards,
msrlattachments
PageNo.
244 6
ofof
523
Page
45
U.S. Page
District
States, et.al.,
7 of 45
02/16/2007
FBI Pro.bes Kugel

Contracts with
N.Carolina Cities
Several Towns Unhappy with Delays;
Kugel Says He'll Fulfill Pacts
Lancasler developer
Owen Kugel, whose rev~taliration succea in domtom
lancaster helpcd him land

%imilsr confram in at least
seven states, is bein inverti.
Bald by, t k , ~ e d e r a fBureau

Of Investlgatron for downtown
revitalization pro'eets in
North Carolina. FBf omcia;
sav.
Robert Pence, in charge
OrNorth Carolina FBI opera.
tiotb. said (he investiflahen
centers on whether Kugel's
OK Assmiales firm based
here is involved in -mail
fraud, wire fraud or any other
typeofrraud.,,
lle added thal Ule use of
interstate racilities, as well as
the use of funds in interstate
eom,yeree,wouldbr studied.
I can confirm that we
are looking into the matter to

determine if an federal laws
have been vioited:. added.
Daniel Womiak, a senior FRI

agent a t Ute bureau's GWM.
boro. N.C.. omce today.
omcials in a t least flve
North Camlina cities sa
they.re dissatisilied w i d
Kugel's prfarmanee on the
contracis and each has asked
him to returnhis w,mfee.
Kugel this mornin& tm
the New Era that he has been
aware of the investigation for
several w e d s and that he is
y p e r a t i n g with authorities
100 percent, in the interest
of &etttg It wrapped up
quie ly
"We know" the outcome
"can on1 be successful from
our standipo' ~nt."he said.
Kuge s a d he did not
know how the FBI got in.

volved in the situation. EX.
Plainin the contracts, he
said i f
d w t ( foum
thmugh on contract pmmis.
es. '.we give the money
back."
On the advice of dis attnr.
W .Alvin B. Lewis Jr.
Kugel wwld not discuss thd
status of the develo
Pro*
underway in
Carolina.
?%h'
Pence said the investiga.

t i ~ began
l
about M days ago.
But Kugel's former vice pres]dent. who arranged the
North Carolina contracts and
PageNo.
245 7
ofof
523
Page
45
U.S. District
States, et.al.,
Page 8 of 45
02/16/2007
JOHN M. C I C A L A SR.
DEVELOPER
22nd & Boardwalk

North Wildwood N.J. 0 8 2 6 0
December 1 2 , 1 9 8 6
Dear P r o p r i e t o r :
Due t o y o u r e x c e l l e n t r e p u t a t i o n a s a s u c c e s s f u l member o f New
J e r s e y ' s S o u t h S h o r e b u s i n e s s c o m m u n i t y , we a r e d e l i g h t e d t o
i n v i t e you t o p a r t i c i p a t e i n a n e x c i t i n g new v e n t u r e : SEAPORT
VILLAGE.
SEAPORT V I L L A G E h a s b e e n d e s i g n e d a s a u n i q u e a n d p i c t u r e s q u e
shopping complex s i t u a t e d a t 22nd S t r e e t i n North Wildwood.
The
complex i s now under c o n s t r u c t i o n on a r e b u i l t , widened p i e r
t h a t w i l l e x t e n d 500 f e e t o u t from t h e boardwalk t o w a d s t h e
ocean. The development, s c h e d u l e d f o r c o m p l e t i o n i n t i m e f o r t h e
s t a r t o f t h e S p r i n g , 1987 season, w i l l f e a t u r e a t o t a l of f o r t y
s p e c i a l t y and f o o d s h o p s . T h e s e s p a c e s a r e now a v a i l a b l e f o r
a n n u a l r e n t a l , a t p r e - c o n s t r u c t i o n p r i c e s r a n g i n g f r o m $30 t o $ 3 6
p e r s q u a r e f o o t . Types of b u s i n e s s e s i n c l u d e d w i l l b e c a r e f u l l y
chosen t o i n s u r e s u c c e s s f o r a l l .
A p e r f o r m a n c e a r e a w i l l be b u i l t a t t h e end o f t h e p i e r . T h i s
a r e a , t o i n c l u d e l i v e t e l e v i s i o n and r a d i o f a c i l i t i e s , w i l l s e r v e
a s t h e s i t e f o r ' p o p u l a r e n t e r t a i n m e n t and o t h e r e v e n t s d e s i g n e d
t o a t t r a c t l a r g e numbers of p e o p l e t h r o u g h o u t t h e s e a s o n as well
a s continued media coverage. Restrooms and o t h e r p u b l i c
a m e n i t i e s w i l l a l s o be included t o help i n c r e a s e f o o t t r a f f i c . A
large
s t a i r w a y w i l l permit beach access.
An e x c i t i n g
a d v e r t i s i n g and p r o m o t i o n campaign i s p l a n n e d t o c a l l a t t e n t i o n
t o SEAPORT VILLAGE.
According t o r e c e n t demographic s t u d i e s , t h e number o f a f f l u e n t

s i n g l e s , c o u p l e s and f a m i l i e s v i s i t i n g North Wildwood e a c h summer
i s r a p i d l y i n c r e a s i n g - along w i t h t h e i r p e r c a p i t a spending.
The o t h e r p i e r s i n t h e a r e a a r e a l l Amusement P i e r s . T h u s ,
S e a p o r t V i l l a g e i s a f i r s t of i t s k i n d - and a n a t u r a l s i t e f o r
t h e r e l o c a t i o n o r e x p a n s i o n of y o u r b u s i n e s s .
T h u s f a r we h a v e a p p r o a c h e d B e n e t t o n , S w a t c h , A t h l e t e ' s F o o t ,
Gimmee J i m m i e s Cookies and Banana R e p u b l i c , a s w e l l a s a s e l e c t
g r o u p of l o c a l b u s i n e s s e s s u c h a s y o u r s t h a t would b e b e s t s u i t e d
t o o u r c o n c e p t and would have t h e g r e a t e s t c h a n c e o f s u c c e s s .
S i n c e r e n t a l s p a c e i s l i m i t e d , we w i l l a c c e p t r e s e r v a t i o n s on a
f i r s t - c o m e , f i r s t - s e r v e d b a s i s . An a r c h i t e c t u r a l r e n d e r i n g of
S e a p o r t V i l l a g e i s e n c l o s e d f o r your f u r t h e r i n f o r m a t i o n .
Our r e p r e s e n t a t i v e , E l l e n Libman, w i l l b e i n y o u r a r e a i n t h e
n e x t two weeks.
S h e w i l l c a l l on y o u t o p r o v i d e you w i t h
a d d i t i o n a l i n f o r m a t i o n . Of c o u r s e p l e a s e f e e l f r e e t o c o n t a c t me
a t anytime.
PageNo.
246
of
523
Page
S i8
n cof
e45
rely,
li
U.S. District
States, et.al.,
Page 9 of 45
02/16/2007
February 1 3 , 1987
Stanley 3. Caterbone
1 7 5 5 Oregon Pike
Lancaster, PA 17601
Re:
Carter Manor Associates
Dear Stan:
Enclosed is a Loan Request for Carter Manor Associates for the
Refinancing of two particular properties that it currently owns
and we would appreciate you consideration of this matter. Please
note that the terms in the Loan Request are negotiable.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Enclosure

PageNo.
247 9
ofof
523
REAL ESTATE Page
DEVELOPMENT
I45
BUSINESS ACOUISITIONS
)
1681 Crown Avenue 1 PO Box 8200 i Lancasler PA 17604 11717) 395-7100
,>.
U.S. District
Court
States, et.al.,
Page 10 of
45
02/16/2007
COLUbBIA ASSET MANAGEMENT CORP.

IXVESTbENT BANKERS
TWINING OFFICE CENTER

715 TWINING ROAD SUITE 116
DRESHER. PA 19025
Scott Rabertson
1755 Oregon P i k e
Lancaster , P A 17601
February 1 0 1987
Dear Scott :
Enclosed i s a vrrite up o n the prcxperty w e discussed.
The owner desires to refinance for a minimum of
$2,500,000 o n a non-recourse assumable basis.
It i s
understood that the enclosure is ta b e forwarded to a
private investor in Texas and is not to b e shown to
anyone else.
I f this is handled to our satisfaction, I would b e

pleased to submit additional properties for your clients
cc-nsideratinn.
Leonard M. Shendell
PageNo.
24810
of 523
Page
of 45
U.S. District
States, et.al.,
Page 11 ofCourt
45
02/16/2007
Qxative Finance Campany

P.O. Box 4412
Lancaster. PA 17604
Hi* Ascciates, LTD.

Tom Kyle
1861 William Pem Way

Iaraster, PA 17601
February 3, 1987
Dear Tom:
,l
As per your recent mane conversation w i t h Bob brig, I would like to give
you scane information reganiing cur lenling ability. I have been selected to
represent a group of Institutiondl Investors that are htemsb3 in projects in
the Eastern part of the acRmtry. We are able to finance projects ranging in
s i z e of $3 t o $100 million.
hrojeds include aparbe&s,
retail, office,
hdwtrial,
health care f a c i l i t i e s , mabile hare parks, hotels and mini
warehouses.
Underwriting can be very f a s t and can often times be approved in
14
days froan time of application.
follow^ is list of underwriting
r q h x m m t s ; pro forma, rent r o l l , financial statemnts, resume of borrower,
and s c a n e under
~
certain c a d i t i o n s an MAI Wraisal. For new a m s t n ~ c t i o n
a sales agreement and cost brealcdowns are r q u i r d .
a copy of our portfolio. I hope that w e on do h i n e s s
together and provide ycmr financing for your next: project, o r possibly prwide
a r e f h n c i q package f o r ycur existing portfolio.
I appreciate the
opportunity to work w i t h you.
~slclosed is
W e may be reached a t the following nlrmber; (717) 569-5555
PageNo.
24911
of 523
Page
of 45
U.S. District
Court
States, et.al.,
Page 12 of
45
02/16/2007
PageNo.
25012
of 523
Page
of 45
U.S. District
States, et.al.,
Page 13 ofCourt
45
02/16/2007
PageNo.
25113
of 523
Page
of 45
U.S. Page
District
States, et.al.,
14 ofCourt
45
02/16/2007
K E N N E PROPERTY
~Y
CORPORAT~ON
A Subsidiaw of Kennedy Health Cars Foundation
May 6, 1987
Mr. Stan Caterbone

1755 Oregon Pike
Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17601
Dear Stan:
This correspondence is to address our previous conversations
regarding the refinancing of some commercial real estate that I
am currently managing for Kennedy Property Corporation. At that
time, you had requested information on each of the buildings so
as to determine the feasability of this endeavor.
Of the four properties listed, three are owned by Kennedy
Property Corporation and the fourth is owned by Professional
Medical Management, Inc. Both companies are subsidiaries of the
Kennedy Health Care Foundation.
Enclosed you will find a description on each property. This is
accompanied by the current lease schedule for each property and
an income statement for Kennedy Property Corporation.
If after reviewing this package you believe that favorable fixed
terms can be provided, please contact me at your earliest
convenience.
Sincerely,
Michael Lawson
Property Manager
ML/~
Enclosures
Stan J. Caterbone Litigation

Valuation
Page
25214
523
December
27, 2016
P.O.Box 1015
' 100 Egg Harbor
Road
'ofTurnersviile.
N.J. (W012 Tuesday
' 604589.3300
Ext. 421
Page
No.
of 45
8'
U.S. District
Court
States, et.al.,
Page 15 of
45
02/16/2007
MICHAEL LAWSON
Property Manager
P.O. rn 101s
im E Q nubor
~
M.
1wmn.Il..
WJ mot1
PageNo.
25315
of 523
Page
of 45
,,".K,.,
WAMCMC".
G..O",
U.S. District
States, et.al.,
Page 16 ofCourt
45
02/16/2007
Management Group, LTD
,,o
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
554 Berliley Road
Stone Hartwr, NJ
( W )%7-5184
08247
J u l y 24, 1987
J i m Bly
Sourcz C a p i t a l
6725 (Xlrran Street
W e a n , VA
22101
. .
Dear J i m :
Enclosed is t h e p a c k * f o r t h e Real E s t a t e Deal as per o u r
c o n v e r s a t i o n . Plg i v e me your response as to a n i n d i c a t i o n of i n t e r e s t as
= a n as p o s s i b l e so t h a t I may c o n t a c t someone else if you are n o t i n t e r e s t e d .
I a p p r e c i a t e your t i m e and c o n s i d e r a t i o n .
Zk
ley J. catertxre
PageNo.
25416
of 523
Page
of 45
Securltl~sOffcred through Planner's Securnler Group. Ine.

A Reglitered BrokcrlDealer
Member StPC
Member NASO
I.
U.S. District
States, et.al.,
Page 17 ofCourt
45
02/16/2007
Scope of B u s i n e s s
Servioes and f u n c t i o n s of SourWilliams.

111. S t r u c t u r e of S y n d i c a t i o n
11.
IV.
V.
Costs
C a p i t a l , I n v e s t o r / I n v e s t o r s , and Bennet
of S y n d i c a t i o n - Bennett W i l l i m F i n a n c i a l Center
Financial Projections
PageNo.
25517
of 523
Page
of 45
sWswpE..a...~~-~.~.s2
.
.
is a
follwing
The
,
U.S. Page
District
States, et.al.,
18 ofCourt
45
02/16/2007
syndication
and
Im.
The
of
to
Bennett
Williams,
Im.
to provide
the
marketing of the 2.6 million o f f i e building to b e constructed
i n downtown York,
function
pr-1
This prqms-a1 is an attecrpt to describe t h e role and
PA.
Swrce Capital
along w i t h the relationships of Bennett Williams,
and the Investor/I-tors.
of the p r o j e c t is to r a i r e the ~
plm
million
(excluding
it
entirety
until
will
be
funded
will
provide
rcapital /approximately 2.6
syndication f e e s ) and to mange the partnership t h r w g h its

dissolved.
is
As per previous conversations, t h e building
m n p l e t e l y from partnership proceeds w i t h t using debt, which
a steady stream of inccme, projected to be between 12%
the p o s s i b i l i t y of refinancing t h e p r o j e c t around t h e =nth
15%w i t h
year i n order to
return the o r i g i m l capital back to the investors.
R1G w i l l
which
also consider developing a F i ~ r C i a S

l e w i c e m n t e r , similar t o that
e x i s t s i n Lamaster.
responsible
for
the
1-
While Bennett Williams w i l l be the major t e n a n t and
up,
f%2 w i l l
consider also a i d i n g i n t h a t pr-
through w n s i o n of t h e i r business to York.
PageNo.
25618
of 523
Page
of 45
U.S. Page
District
States, et.al.,
19 ofCourt
45
02/16/2007
I.: DELI% E . B F T T . ..WIUI.W.-zTK GU'E~...~~~E~..IG..~?.,.)

T k Gewral Partner (GP) will be responsible for t k following:
a).
Development
The G.P.
will be r-nsible
for all dsvelcpwnt
involved in t k project.
b).
Construction - The G.P.
will be r q n s i b l e for all construction
pbses associated with the project.
c).
Lait-g - All leasing responsibilities will be of the G.P.

G.P.
The
will have the task of obtaining l a occupancy of the building
i n a reasomble and timely fashion. The G.P.
will also be
responsible for determining the fair market value of the =paand for attracting attractive t e ~ n t s
with favorable leasing
agreements to maintain a favorable and healthy cash flow.
d).
Management
- The G.P.
will be m n s i b l e for the managsent of
both tenants and the building in order to obtain maximum
income and future appreciation given favorable eoomnic oonditions.
PageNo.
25719
of 523
Page
of 45
U.S. District
States, et.al.,
Page 20 ofCourt
45
02/16/2007
LL W L I C N E ~.%...%!?IT.K
MG, Ltd. w i l l be r e q x n s l b l e f o r the follcwing services and factors:
a).
The Syndicator w i l l be r e n s i b l e f o r a l l legal

services rezdsd to register the partnership with
and a-nting
the a p p r w r i a t e regulatory authorities i n order to solicit

investors.
b).
Prospectus - The Syndicator w i l l be reqmnsible f o r the development
to be used to solicit investors.
and prmhction of the pr-tus
c).
Marketing
- The Syndicator
w i l l be responsible f o r the marketing
and s o l i c i t a t i o n of investors i n order to r a i s e the necessary

capital to f i m n c e the project.
d).
Distribution of ~ r o c e e d s- The Syndicator w i l l be responsible f o r

a-nting
and reporting functions necesrary to provide investors
w i t h the progress and performance of the Partnership.
The
Syndicator w i l l be r w n s i b l e f o r the reporting regulations of the

Interm1 Revewe Service f o r
both Investors and the G.P.
The
Syndicator w i l l a l m be responsible f o r U7e distribution of p
both &ring operation and upon sale w r e f i ~ n c i n gof the project.
PageNo.
25820
of 523
Page
of 45
is a c k s c r ~ p t i o nof the s t r u c t u r e of t k p a r t n e r s h i p .
follcwing
The
Partnership
Private
U.S. Page
District
States, et.al.,
21 ofCourt
45
02/16/2007
will
be
Pla-nt
T k
r e g i s t e r e d by t k Securities and Exckr@ Carmisrion a s a
-lation
D, Rule 144 Offering.
T h i s w i l l l i m i t t h e rxlrrber
of u m c c r e d i t e d i n v e s t o r s t o 35.
Bennet Williams Inc. - General P a r t n e r
. .
Eqity:
20% of P a r t n e r s h i p sale d i s t r i b u t i o n s
Incane:
15%of Net c a s h f l o w d i s t r i b u t i o n s
Souroe C a p i w - Marketing F e e s
Eqity:
5% of P a r t n e r s h i p =le proceeds.
Incane:
@ of N e t c a s h flow d i s t r i b u t i o n s
Eqlity:
75%
I m :
85%
Load :
ES% of c a s h goes i n t o actual development
of Net P r c c e d s
PageNo.
25921
of 523
Page
of 45
U.S. Page
District
States, et.al.,
22 ofCourt
45
02/16/2007
(gipl-hlwill receive ~ r o x i m t e l y 8% of the capital raie&
in
the necessary services associated with the project.
This
order to perform
imludes all legal, accrxlnting and marketing fees needed.
Bennett-Williams will receive a 3%G.P. developnent fee for pltting the project
together (building design, construction %pervision
The
.
Broker/Dealer
...etc.).
needed) will receive a 1% syndication fee for
(if
registration
partnership.
and
preparation of financial disclosure
This means approximately a8% of
j' iltilding
the capital raised will go into the actual
and grand. This ircludes all 1-1,
of the partmrship.
documents for the
aoaunting, printing, marketing,
With this ratio, the program will be among the most
marketable anywhere in the country.
PageNo.
26022
of 523
Page
of 45
FiMnCial
Center
has
U.S. Page
District
States, et.al.,
23 ofCourt
45
02/16/2007
LTD. w i l l a t t e c r p t to &welop a F i M I X i a l Service
M a ~ m n t . Grcup,
to
similar
the L a n c a s t e r Office i n t h e b u i l d i n g b e i n g vndicated.
MG
d e v e l q x d a F u l l Service F i m w i a l C e n t e r t h a t p r o v i d e s a l l of the r e l a t i v e
services
re=essary to
and institutions.
mamge t h e f i ~ n c i a affairs
l
of i n d i v i d a l s , b u s i n e s s e s
The Center w i l l i n c l u d e the f o l l o w i n g services:
1. F i r e n c i a 1 Planning
Finamial
the
2.
Investment and P o r t f o l i o Management
3.
k c c u n t i n g and Tax P r e p a r a t i o n
4.
Real E s t a t e Services
5.
Legal Servioes
6.
I ~ r a r c Services
e
7.
Managewnt
Lamaster
role i n
the
that
been
pt
w i l l s t r u c t u r e the C e n t e r similar to that of
LTD
with
the
e x c e p t i o n that Bennett Williams w i l l have a
f o r m a t i o n and the o p e r a t i o n s o f the Center.
and
structured
~ and nMortgage
t
Banking
Group,
location
recruiting
Pave
managerent
dweloped
of
and
the
-ration
used
in
Ft% w i l l p r o v i d e the
and w i l l u s e t h e w r r e n t s y s m
Lancaster.
The
ownership w i l l be
m n g MG, B e n n e t t W i l l i a m , and the other Major P l a y e r s who wish to
involved.
Enclw_sd is a n o r i g i ~ Busil
P l a n t h a t o u t l i n e s tk c o n c e p t
i n more detail.
PageNo.
26123
of 523
Page
of 45
following
The
of
U.S. Page
District
States, et.al.,
24 ofCourt
45
02/16/2007
Firms have exprezsed very s t r o n g and f a v o r a b l e i n d i c a t i o n s
i n t e r e s t to s i g n lorg term 1-
this
will
the
be
premier
office
agreements f o r -ace.
q ~ c elocated
P l e a s e be aware t h a t
i n Downtown York, and mt
irrportantly w i l l be the Only O f f i c e S>acz with on site parking.

will
be
rented
for
$30.00
Parking spa-
p e r month, and t h i s is t h e f a i r market v a l u e , n o t
c o n s i d e r i n 3 the convienewe.
Bennet
Williams
agreemenb.
and
will
occupy
25%
of
the
space
a t market v a l u e lease
Bennet W i l l i a m s is t h e l a r g s t Real E s t a t e Firm i n the York area,
is one of the L a r i Q t i n C e n t r a l Pennsylvania.
Dave %had is the P r e s i d e n t
and can be reached a t (717) 843-5551.
Cum-ican Erpress
York Bank
7 . W Sq. F t .
10,000
"
FIcrxrunting Firm
5,000
"
wraisal Firm
1,1333
"
Bennet ~ i l l i a m s
8,000
Total
3 1 , 5 0 Square F e e t
'
PageNo.
26224
of 523
Page
of 45
U.S. District
States, et.al.,
Page 25 ofCourt
45
02/16/2007
WSH FLOW
WRD COSTS
WISITImi
CCNSTRUCTIa'l
4% CONTINGENCY FEE
$1.960,00CI.O(i
31,000 32. FT. @ $10.00

9,033 SQ. FT. @ $6.00
108 PARKIW SPACES e m/m.
$310,000
TClrPL INCOME
$402,800
$54,003
$38,800
SOFT COSTS
DES1Q.I
FuWISHINGlj
F I W I f f i FEES
TOTAL COSTS
$ 1 ~ , 0 ~ k l . ~
$m,oi3o.ix
C ; W ON CAW RETURN
$ZB,KKl.Oi,
$Z,~~R,GXJ.IX)
PageNo.
26325
of 523
Page
of 45
15
U.S. District
Court
States, et.al.,
Page 26 of
45
02/16/2007
PageNo.
26426
of 523
Page
of 45
U.S. District
States, et.al.,
Page 27 ofCourt
45
02/16/2007
PageNo.
26527
of 523
Page
of 45
h 8 ADqebSr
U.S. Page
District
States, et.al.,
28 ofCourt
45
02/16/2007
QL 90067
FEB 1
::mA~.Culcrr'b
SEE REVERSE
SIDE FOR
INSTRUCTIONS
s
t&--.
......-..
~-
FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT

THE FOLLOWING PERSONIS) IS (ARE) DOING BUSINESS AS:
lFictitious B&ess
1.
AUDIO SERVlcBs/mBarr sowD aooIOs
,- Street Address Cltb & State of P r ~ n c ~ pplace

al
of B u s ~ n e r s ~Cal~forp~a
n
2.
-1
Full name a e g l s t r a n t
ZIPCode
1137 north k c a d d e n Place, Lam Angrlem, CA
...
--
Name(~)
90038
( ~corporation
f
show state of ~ncorporat~onl
I
"side-
"ress
City
State
Zip Code
madden Place, La6 Angelas, CA 90038

&
Full name of Registrant
(if corporation - show state of incorporation)
1137
lQorth
Res~denceAddress
1 (1
City
State
--
bullname of Registrant
ZiPGde
(if corpaatlon . show state of inmporatio")
I
i
Residence Address
~.
...
City
State
-
Full name of Registrant
- .. - . .
Stale
.
5.
- --
__
17p Codr
L
?-
~ .. . . ~ ~
.~
.
s
I
t
a n 80deradu.l I 1 a wneral wrln.#mlo I I larn8tad mrln.nnar,
t
ta~,Is?...a1...8ala.l
*.I.=I
..tt-rr a
n.,, a oar#,>e-rn~u
(
ro,on,.8qa,n I 8
ba,.enn.
t r ~ a s t icb&*.
~ . . . .
*
....
1 3 d . u
,
onr
Typed or Printed--
---
...
...
4
'
,,
?*
a
.
~
.
--
--
. __-..-
rn
..
.efile - Statement expire

December 31.<*
File No.
....-
.h
C&~I?*;(
::
on &re indiuted by file sump a b
---Cwnty
IHEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS COPY IS A CORRECT COPY

OF THE ORIGINAI.STATEMENTOL1 FILE I N M Y OFFICE.
!
7.
2 4
a'%>
ry.
1
THE L m ANGELES
DAILY
Y)URI\IAL
Stan J. Caterbone
Litigation
Valuation
c.uus+n( ,am
210 South & r w S t r r t . P 0 110. Yo16
L a A W k . Wltc.",. Oa)+l
T*.pho12131 6252141
,=
'
I
I
:'.:#.
. . . . . . .-.
Signature & Title
-", I
-L.
Corporation Name
7-
6. New Fict~tiousBusineu
Name Statement
c,N~v(
I f Registrant a corporation r@ below:
-(
Signed
,F
~~~
1 This statement was filed with the County Clerk of

- .
. . . . . .
-
111 corporatlon show state of lncorporat~onl
Zip Code
c-
PageNo.
26628
of 523
Page
of 45
......... ,_.__-....
Y)URNAL
OF COMMERCE
- REVIEW
Tuesday
December
27, 2016
**-.I.
210 h
- -
~~
L.U(.II*I."
>el7
m s . .strrl.
~ r.o eo. wx
~
Wlt--"l.
. ~
sM11
.
.-
.*klI-
'
r
to File U.S. mdivldual

lncqms ,Tak
~et$ih',
..
. .
.
r r T-R
Lnr. ,0,
I . . . . '
U.S. Page
District
Group
29wd
ofCourt
45
YourAdvanced
riot nam.Media
and l n
a t ~ a(if
l loon1 mum. d s a Or* spouse'.
turn
InlUaO
. .
GOM ~ u o n l
.
.
....
Wd
f
Ressnt homo address (Number and ~l,?naWik
' ~ . n m . b aw ,v d w
r:
city. t a m or port ouca. stat*. snd z ~ ~ c o d .

C UCVEri C l T y
Cr(~
///3'/
r
MARY
16-4014b CATERBONE
v. United
States, et.al.,
02/16/2007
s l nome
'
' '
cdcerc/cnwd
:, , +
'
<.
3003 y
/g.
':
.. . : .
. . ~
this lorm with the lntsrnal Rsvenue Service Cnter.wnere you m r t flle y o u r i w n m tir return ;nd;p'.y
t h mOuat
ShoWlUn
.
,
,
line 6 be:@w.Thls is not an eltenslon of Unw lor payment of tar. Tke k w mqalra that'e pen& beth.f#ed f or late. w$m#IIt
bt
p.
'?.:.
.,.
tar and idle lil~npunless you show relaonible cause for not payon. the tax when due (see 4nstructlonO);,
r1.m .swt to 11Ia a 1981 plt 114 ralurn (form 709) due p h d n a t)r clow of Uw W h dwda awmc of 19ll.chclchnba8 0.
HQbl: file
Ol
. yder I&.&
. + ' : ;.. -
1. mausst
an autornatoc 2.rnontlj eltensoon 01 tln~e'untllJune.15. 1SZ. In whlch
to file F o m 1040 for tho-lender
.
..
,.
w hwal year return until .................... 1................-.- L
.
.
:
.
.
19--.
fw th. .tar. year beginning
A
. . .. . .
and ending ............................................... 19........)<
. -.-....-...-...--.
,.
,,&
'
'
:~.1981,.. .
. . . . . I . .
.,.
.lo I
;l Total income tar liability for 1981 (You n). e s t i ~ t thla
e .ino~nL).
I, Mot.: YOU must enter an amount on line
If p. . u do not *Ip.Ct to 0"
enter zero (0).
.
B Federal Income tax withheld
,
LI.
........... .......
95 1.981estimated tax payrnwta (include 1980 ov&&nt

1: Other payments (sea instruction E)
)I,
Totai (add l i n n 2.3, and 4)
,bawd u icredit).
. .
..............
..........................
G lncome tax balance due (subtract line 5 fmrn line
1). Pay In full with mlr form
..:.....
,r Total gift tax you expect to owe for 1981 (w inshuctian E).Notc This i s the amount you oxput to gw
r for the giit tax return due following the cJow ot me tounh uI*nd.r q u e r h r d 1981
l,liny--'i
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
m . .~
(Aimtruciion fot
., . . . . . . . . . . . ... . .
-.
I 1
.........
u b . w c M i w b r t h i l n m a m d ~ m ~ d ~ r l t + ? a ~ ~ ~ ~ * . m & ~ h & i r ~
. .~ . ~. . ~ ' * ~ ~ * ~ .
.ignature and Verification

I If R e p a r d by Teapayer.-Undu
puraltles ofperluy, Ideclen that Ihave bumlnd'thla form, lndudinp eccMnpnylng schadula
.!a
StdtcllIents, and to the best of my knowledge and bllef. it Is truo, corn(..ndcomplete.
.
IfPrepared by Someone Other Than ~w:&Und.rp.d.y,a of pwfuy, I
I h& &mi&
rrwnpanying schedules and statemants and to Ui. best of my I&i n d bollof. .kbtiuq- ai+,. .dd
. .
buthorized to prepre this form; and that Iam: . '
,.
hymt
pwd cause. MY relationship toihetar&y6rand th.'iwii+v@;tli,

...
.. ...
..
.; . .
&
..
t&yuannot
. . .
PageNo.
26729
of 523
Page
of 45
*\,,
."..'. .
*,'&id&
.....
~e ' . .!. ...:.
in,
~.,
-- .
e p l a t b - t h q l'iin
. .
mernbor In &modstandlng of the bar of th.
court .@ (spdfy luWls(l4n)
. :
. ? .
ceitified pubnic accountant qualifiql to p m c t b In (*panjurId)_
1 A panon anmlled to practlce beforethe Internal Revenue S.rvlu.
nl h authorized agent holding' a power of .ttorn+. (YOUn w d not u n d in the power of ~ m o unhss
y
requv.)
1 A penon in close personal br bu.slnau rektion~hlptq Uu bxpem annot ilgn.pilstormkcaliq of l l t n . 4 ' i ) b l r ~
.%.
-. .:
Iqdudlng.
t q , af&,
'
.. , . . .
.!?
v..-
+.:.
*.z
'
.:.'
. ,.
i ,.,,-
ora@U
.......-.~
<;
. . .. . . .? L. U.
:.!
"
. . . . . . . . .. . ..
U.S. District
States, et.al.,
Page 30 ofCourt
45
02/16/2007
PageNo.
26830
of 523
Page
of 45
BROUT&
U.S. District
Court
States, et.al.,
Page 31 of
45
02/16/2007
COMPANY
CERTICIED PUBLIC A C C O U N T A N T S
v E r 10'1
. LOS A N G Z L E S
W O R m l S V O l N . N d.
1900 A V E N U E O F T H E S T A R S
LOF. A N G E L E S .
213
Dear
7-i 3
CAL~FORN~A
90087
553-1941
'
E n c l o s e d i s ttie o r i g i n a l and o n e c o p y o f t h e County o f L o s A n g e l e s B u s i n e s s

S t a t e m e n t a s o f Marcti 1. 1982.
The o r i g i n a l s h o u l d b e s i g n e d b y you a n d p o s t m a r k e d o n or b e f o r e A p r i l 30. 1982.
Mail to:
County o f Los A n g e l e s
Office of t h e Assessor
dPFF.) 4
@A
9 /YO(
The d u p l i c a t e c o p y i s f o r y o u r f i l e .
Very t r u l y y o u r s ,
BROUT h COMPANY
Enclosures
PageNo.
26931
of 523
Page
of 45
From the &sk of

...
U.S. District
Court
States, et.al.,
Page 32 of
45
02/16/2007
ROBERT 0. ACKERMAN
519 CENTRAL AVE.
PageNo.
27032
of 523
Page
of 45
HIGHLAND PARK, IL 60035
(312)433-4500
U.S. District
Court
States, et.al.,
Page 33 of
45
02/16/2007
PLANNER'S SECURITIES
CONSULTING SERVICES
Planner's Securities Consulting Services offers the independence

and expertise to help the client:
1. Develop an INVESTMENT PLAN
2. Determine the criteria for selection of an INVESTMENT

MANAGER
3. Evaluate investment managers, presenting only

those who can meet investment plan's needs
4. Monitor these investment managers' performances
within customer set parameters
5. Monitor monthly detail reports

Our structured approach saves a plan's sponsor, trustees or
individuals time and effort and allows them to retain control over
asset management.
PageNo.
27133
of 523
Page
of 45
U.S.Page
District
States, et.al.,
34 of Court
45
02/16/2007
PTY.
~ ~ t ~ t f e e i s b a t e d o n t h e m a r k e t ~ ~ l o l u e
d the. account, hrdudlng tush. as shown on fhe lnltlal and

gUatW oppratsd a cutodlan bank octhrity 4
..Th;e maw
auement tee k d e t e c m i n e d - m tto the f o l m scheduk
.
S I . ~ ~ ~ X K K ) C ~ M O ~ ~ ~ ~ V O ~ ~
.85%onnext
..
-75%on next
.65% on nad
-6% on next
s i m m o f ~orketva~ue' .
'
~1.OObXXKJ
0f;MarketWil~e
s l ~ I . l O O C 4MarketValue
R X B ) I ~ E m R T m l m
(~axabieor Non TcKable)
5 of 1%of Maket Value
Fees are prepoyable quatecly. @ d e m g emay be &ed

allocated per ciient )nmuctlons
PageNo.
27234
of 523
Page
of 45
and
Name
.(
Address
INVESTMENT
MANAGER
U.S. Page
District
States, et.al.,
35 ofCourt
45
02/16/2007
Dataform
614 LANDIS AVENUE
i city/~tate/Zip
Ownership
VINELAND.
NEW JERSEY
e Feestructure
08360
800-257-7013
DONALD SULAM
SUZANNE GREENBERG
.JUNE 1 9 7 3
Date Founded
PARTNERSHIP
1 Affiliation
NONE
Minimum
Tax-Exempt
fi
c Account Size:
S100.000
Minimum
Fee:
Taxable
Tax-Exempt
$1.500
Taxable
SEE ATTACHED FEE SCHEDULE
z Manage:
Equity
Only
Capital Markets Used: Stock lxl

I
Real Estate
Equity
Asset Mix in All
jEqJy Accounts as of
Telephone
Contact
Name
Contact
Name
CUMBERLAND ADVISORS, PTY.
Mutual Funds Managed:
Balanced
Acwunts
Corporate
Bond
Fixed
Cash
Income [ia Management (7 Other: MUNICIPAL BONDS
Government
International
Bond
(7 Cash IXI
Securities
(7
Futures
Options
Max Equity
CD' S
Other:
100 %
Min. Equity
CUMBERLAND GROWTH FUND
- In-HouseCo-Mingled Funds: .
Special Services (check one):
Active
Passive
NIA
Minimum Account
Size (specify):
Bond lmmunization/Bond Dedication

Municipal Bonds
Socially Sensitive (if asked, will not invest in "sin" stocks)
Convertible Preferreds
-
Convertible Bonds
Government Bonds
INVESTMENT STYLE:
attach statement of investment philosophy and style for each type of management.
f
send a copy o f your current marketing piece, contract(s), ADV andfiscal report.
@ 1886 Richard SchlMMh h Awcdates. Ud.The lnlonnatbn providedhaiein la oblalned lrom the investment manager named herein
.ndPublkly lvailaMe .wroes and la bePsMd to be rdiaMe, bul ma mpwmbtlon or wananly is made w to ks accuracy or axnpleteness.
PageNo.
27335
of 523
Page
of 45
1 1 u v c 3I MEN I
Dataform
Name
MANAtikH
U.S. District
Court
States, et.al.,
Page 36 of
45
02/16/2007
Swanson C a p i t a l Management
Telephone
Contact
Address
4 6 0 0 Fashion Square Blvd. ~ t 109
e
& 111 Name
Contact
Cit~/State/Zi~ Saginaw, M I 48608
Name
Ownership
Incorporated
Affiliation
Minimum
Account Size:
None
Fee Structure
1%F~~~~
Taxable
$100.000
Stephen Swanson
Date Founded 1973
Tax-Exempt
$100,000
(517) 790-1291
Minimum
Fee:
Tax-Exempt
$1,000
Taxable
$1,000
In-HouseCo-Mingled Funds: 0
.
Active
El
Municipal Bonds
El
a
rn
rn
Convertible Bonds
Government Bonds
Minimum Account
Size (specify):
rn
NIA
Bond Immunization/Bond Dedication
Socially Sensitive (if asked, will not invest in "sin" stodts)
Passive
INVESTMENT STYLE:
Please a m h statement of investment philosophy and sty* for each
of manawment.
i nt"fe rend a m p y of your current marketing piece, wntract(s), ADV and f seal report.
d
01 s f l l c h d SChlmMh I ate^, M.Th. lnform6lbnpmvldad IwreIn b obtained fmm the inwamdnt mamger named herem
~ ~ ~ n W * ~ . . ~ b b e ~ t ~ b e r e ~ s b l e ~ b u l m ~ t l o n o r w ~ ~ k m & ~ t o ~ t s - ~ o r a m
PageNo.
27436
of 523
Page
of 45
INVESTMENT
MANAGER
U.S. Page
District
States, et.al.,
37 ofCourt
45
02/16/2007
Dataform
(818) 247-5330
Telephone
(213) 245- 7 4 6 1
Contact
Name
Richard A. Snyders
Contact
1 Name
Name
Van Deventer & Hoch

420 North Brand Boulevard, Suite 405
Address Glendale, CA 91203
cin//State/zip
Ownership
Date Founded
Chemical New York Cor~oration
Affiliation
Minimum
~ c c o u nSize:
t
Tax-Exempt
Taxable
$100,000
$100,000
1969
Minimum
Tax-Exempt
Fee:
(annual) $2.000
Taxable
$2,000
Feestructure 2% first $100,000; 1% next $200,000; 3/4% next $200,000:
2/3% all over $500,000

Manage:
Equity
Only
Capital Markets Used: Stock

Real Estate
Equity
Asset Mix in A l l
in/ Accounts as of
n/a
Mutual Funds Managed:
In-House Co-Mingled Funds:
Balanced
Accounts
Corporate
Bond
Fixed
Cash
Income
Management
Other:
Government
International
Bond
Cash [XI
Securities
Futures
Options
Max Equity
Other:
%
Min. Equity
none
none
Active
Passive
Minimum Account
Size (specify):
I3
Bond Irnmunization/Bond Dedication

Municipal Bonds
N/A
[7
Ed
I3
0
0
Socially Sensitive (if asked, will not invest in "sin" stocks)

rn
Convertible Bonds
El
Government Bonds
Ed
INVESTMENT STYLE:
ease attach statement of investment philosophy and style for ewh type of management.
M a copy of your current marketing piece, contractls), ADV and fiscal report.
a-
01986 Richud Schimarth &ksoda(es. m.~ h Infanutbn

s
prov~ed
m h is obtained fmm the lnvwtmnr manager named herem
."d
prblidy .MIlabb
wrcw m
nd b belle& to be rel&e.
bul
mrepresentabon
a wanamy k made
as to its accuracy
aampkrtemtss.
Stan J.
Caterbone
Litigation
Valuation
Page
275
of
523
Tuesday
December
27, 2016
Page No. 37 of 45
Van Deuenier
81 Hoch
4.0 North Brand

~1enda.k.
California 9120)
(213) 247-5330/24;
U.S.Boulevard
District
16-4014 CATERBONE
v. United
States,
et.al.,
Page 38 ofCourt
45
02/16/2007
Id
Investment Counsel
FEE SCHEDULE
Fees are charged QUARTERLY in advance using the following
W A L formula:
Portfolio
Value
Fee as a % of
portfolio Value
First
$100,000
2%
Next
$200,000
1%
Next
$200,000
3/4 9
Amounts
Over
$500,000
2/39
Examples of V A L Fees:
Portfolio
Value
I
I
I
i
I
Fee as a % of
portfolio Value
Annual
Fee
750,000
7,167
0.96
1,000,000
8,833
0.88
2,000,000
15,500
0.78
3,500,000
25,500
0.73
5,000,000
35,500
0.71
pINIMUM ANNUAL FEE:
$2,000 PER YEAR
Note: No start-up or termination charses
II
I
PageNo.
27638
of 523
Page
of 45
U.S. District
Court
States, et.al.,
Page 39 of
45
02/16/2007
..
.
.'
.'*
- -._%
- ----.-!---.;
=.L
L.1;
--.
-__
PENSION A N D PROFIT SHARING COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT FUND
REPORT O N EXAMINATIONS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

for the years ended December 31, 1986 and 1985
PageNo.
27739
of 523
Page
of 45
U.S.Page
District
States, et.al.,
40 of Court
45
02/16/2007
To the Board of Directors

~ari-isburg,Pennsylvania
We have examined the statements of assets and liabilities
of the
Pension and Profit Sharing Collective Investment Fund
as of December 31. 1986 and 1985, including the portfolio of investments as of December 31, 1986, and the related statements of operations and changes in net assets for the years then ended. Our
examinations were made in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and, accordingly, included confirmation of investments
held for the account of the fund by the custodians, and such tests of
the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.
.In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly the financial position of the
Pension and Profit Sharing Collective Investment Fund as of December 31, 1986 and
1985, and the results of its operations and the changes in its net
assets for the years then ended, in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles applied on a consistent basis.
We have also previously examined. in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. the financial statements of the
fund for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
1984; and we expressed unqualified opinions on those financial statements.
In our opinion, the financial information set forth in Note 4
to the financial statements for each of the five years in the period
ended December 31, 1986, is fairly stated in all material respects
in relation to the financial statements from which it has been
derived.
March 19. 1987
PageNo.
27840
of 523
Page
of 45
,f&Q
L,76
',."-
I . . .
.. . , .
2 Media Group
Advanced
- ;...
-.:.-::r-
.?.-
' States,
?
U.S.Page
District
Court
41 of
45
02/16/2007
PENSION
AND
P16-4014
R O F I T CATERBONE
S H A R I N & ' " v.
, . -United
-&:%
;
I v , - !et.al.,
. ! : , 2 .:$?
.u:
COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT FUND
...
I
h
"//...,.
! .
... . _...
STATEMENTS O F A S S E T S AND L I A B I L I T I E S
December 31, 1986 and 1985
ASSETS:
Investments at value (cost

$126,174,490 and $125,472,567,
respectively)
Cash
Accrued interest and dividends
receivable
Total assets
LIABILITIES:
Income due participants for month
of December 1986, payable
January 1, 1987 at rate of
$.697 per unit and for month
of December 1985, payable
January 1, 1986 at rate of
S.800 per unit
Accrued expenses
Total liabilities
NET ASSETS
Net assets are represented by:
Funds applicable to 1,093,410 units
outstanding, equivalent to
$131.00 per unit in 1986,,and
to 1,174,423 units outstanding
equivalent to $121.81 per unit
in 1985:
Consisting of:
Amounts invested by
participating trusts
Accumulated gain on securities
sold o r redeemed
Unrealized appreciation
of investments
Excess of accumulated redemption
value of units redeemed
over participants' cost
Undistributed net investment
income
111,304,255
116,450,421
24,250,255
13,163,605
15,432,951
15,944,284
(7,778,196)
(2,520,983)
28,780
16,695
$143,238,045
$143,054,022
See accompanying notes to financial statements.

PageNo.
27941
of 523
Page
of 45
'
U.S. District
States, et.al.,
Page 42 ofCourt
45
02/16/2007
THE VILLAGE OF OLDE HICKORY

VILLAGE SQUARE OF OLDE HICKORY
OLDE HICKORY RACQUET CLUB
BOYDfWILSON BUILDING
OREGON PIKE
MANHEIM TOWNSHIP
LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
for
BOYD/WILSoN COMPANY
MARY L. CLINTON
APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC.
PRESIDENT
DATED:
SEPTEMBER 1, 1985
PageNo.
28042
of 523
Page
of 45
.,.
. ..,
.. . .. .-
U.S. Page
District
States, et.al.,
43 ofCourt
45
02/16/2007
430 WEST CHESTNUT STREET
LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA 17603
October 2 3 , 1985
BoydfWilson Company
208 Oregon Pike
L a n c a s t e r , PA 17601
ATTN: Dale Witmer
RE:
The Olde Hickory Complex
Dear M r . Witmer:
I n accordance with your r e q u e s t , I have examined t h e above p r e m i s e s , c o n s i s t i n g
of a group of townhouses, 3.0 s t o r y e l e v a t o r garden apartment b u i l d i n g s , a l o c a l
shopping c e n t e r , ( 2 ) o f f i c e b u i l d i n g s , a r a c q u e t c l u b and miscellaneous improvements
i n c l u d i n g a swimming p o o l , a 30 a c r e g o l f c o u r s e and t e n n i s c o u r t s l o c a t e d on
approximately 100 a c r e s of l a n d i n Manheim Township, L a n c a s t e r County, Pennsylvania.
The purpose of my examination and s t u d y i s t o v a l u e t h e premises i n t h e c u r r e n t
market .
I n a r r i v i n g a t my v a l u a t i o n , I have among o t h e r f a c t o r s c o n s i d e r e d t h e following:
(1)
Location Trends. The V i l l a g e of Olde Hickory and t h e surrounding developing

a r e a i s an a t t r a c t i v e r e s i d e n t i a l d i s t r i c t . I am o f t h e o p i n i o n t h a t i t
w i l l maintain i t s p r e s e n t s t a t u s o r g r a d u l l y improve.
(2)
I e s t i m a t e t h e e s t a b l i s h e d Net Income imputable t o a l l t h e f r a c t i o n s of t h e

V i l l a g e of Olde Hickory a t $1,324,333 p e r annum.
(3)
C a p i t a l i z e d Value f o r both income flows which computes a t $13,000,000

per annum. T h i s i s p r e d i c a t e d upon t h e t o t a l e a r n i n g s o f $1,324.333 p e r
annum c a p i t a l i z e d a t an o v e r a l l r a t e of 10.14%.
I n my o p i n i o n , t h e market v a l u e of t h e premises i n t h e c u r r e n t market is:

THIRTEEN MILLION DOLLARS
I n l i g h t of t h e s e c o n s i d e r a t i o n s and o t h e r f a c t o r s s e t f o r t h i n my a p p r a i s a l r e p o r t
which f o l l o w s , I have a r r i v e d a t t h e aforementioned v a l u a t i o n .
Respectfully submitted,
l i n t o n Valuation
L. CLitigation
Stan J. Mary
Caterbone
president
PageNo.
28143
of 523
Page
of 45
U.S. District
States, et.al.,
Page 44 ofCourt
45
02/16/2007
INCOME APPROACH
VILLAGE OF OLDE HICKORY:
DEFINITION: T h i s approach d e a l s with t h e p r e s e n t worth and f u t u r e p o t e n t i a l

b e n e f i t s of t h e p r o p e r t y . This i s g e n e r a l l y measured by t h e n e t income which
a f u l l y informed person i s warranted i n assuming t h e p r o p e r t y w i l l produce d u r i n g
t h e remaining u s e f u l l i f e . A f t e r comparison with investments of s i m i l a r t y p e and
c l a s s , t h e n e t income i s c a p i t a l i z e d i n t o a value e s t i m a t e .
The g r o s s and n e t income g e n e r a t e d by t h e c u r r e n t r e n t s f o r t h e y e a r 1985 a r e
d i v i d e d as f o l l o w s :
Residential
Commercial Income
Golf & Swimming
Annual Gross Income
Annual Net Income
$2,224,766
$1,072,465
275,714
204,182
93,310
(11,870)
Racquet Club
Total
(Expense r a t i o i s 52% of g r o s s ( i n c l u d i n g vacancy & bad debt allowance).
The r e s i d e n t i a l income o f $2,224,766 p e r annum averages $89.31 p e r room p e r month.

The l e a s e s have a 1 y e a r term with t e n a n t s absorbing a l l o f t h e i r e l e c t r i c a l charges
which i n c l u d e s e l e c t r i c h e a t i n g , a i r c o n d i t i o n i n g and h o t w a t e r .
Management e x p e c t s a t u r n o v e r of 30% t o 35% i n t h e r e s i d e n t i a l u n i t s d u r i n g 1985.
This would i n c r e a s e t h e r e n t r o l l m a t e r i a l l y a s shown on t h e following s c h e d u l e o f
Monthly Rates e f f e c t i v e September 1, 1985.
A 3% allowance f o r vacancy and bad d e b t s was considered a p p r o p r i a t e due t o t h e f a c t

t h a t t h e r e i s g e n e r a l l y a w a i t i n g l i s t f o r new c o n t r a c t s .
COMMERCIAL RENTALS:
Rentals f o r t h e shopping c e n t e r , t h e f o u r o f f i c e s i n t h e former s t o n e farmhouse and
3 r e t a i l and o f f i c e u n i t s i n t h e Boyd/Wilson Building aggregates $275,714 p e r annum
( s e e schedule of b a s e r e n t a l s ) . A 5% vacancy and bad debt d e d u c t i o n appears a p p r o p r i
based on p a s t h i s t o r i c a l r e c o r d s .
The r e n t a l o f f i c e ( U n i t 6 ) does n o t c o n t r i b u t e any r e n t . I have a p p l i e d a r e n t a l o f
$6.75 p e r s q . i t . which i s i n t h e lower h a l f of t h e r e n t r o l l range which computes
I
1
t o $9,072 annually.
The income from t h e Golf and Swim Club which we have taken from t h e l a s t s t a t e m e n t
of e a r n i n g s i s $93,310 p e r annum and m i s c e l l a e o u s income approximates $5,000 p e r y e a r
CHESTNUT
Stan J. Caterbone
PageNo.
28244
of 523
Tuesday
December 27,
2016
x P P a SLitigation
a 1 ~ S S Valuation
O C S . ~ S 430 WEST
STREET, IANCASTER,
PENNSYLVANIA
116m
Page
of 45
U.S. District
States, et.al.,
Page 45 ofCourt
45
02/16/2007
June 15, 1987

Mr. Stanley Caterbone
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GROUP LTD
1755 Oregon Pike
Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17601
Dear Stan:
It was good speaking with you - - at last - - after our message
go round. Enclosed are the materials you requested. I expect that
this should reach you by Wednesday.
As I indicated to you, Hunterdon County is the area I have tareeted
for development in New Jersey. InteretaLc 78 was completed this
year and tied Hunterdon County into a 25-35 minute commute to many
major corporate centers in New Jersey, i.e. Morristown. Princeton
and New Brunswick. After completing a survey of the area, I am
satisfied with the resulting information. I have been dealing with
local brbkers with a view towards locating both residential and
commercial sites for development, several properties are under negotiation
at this time. These projected investments are well leveraged and
offer impressive cash-on-cash returns.
I look forward to discussing these opportunities with you.
SW:wc
Enclosures
Via Express Mali

1 2 0
C O U N T Y
R O A D
PageNo.
28345
of 523
Page
of 45
I E N A F

N l
O I h 7 O
2 0 1
5 6 8 h 8 7 5
Page 284 of 523
Page 285 of 523
Page 286 of 523
Page 287 of 523
Page 288 of 523
Page 289 of 523
Page 290 of 523
June 22, 1990

Peggy Hay, Agent
Commonwealth Department Of Revenue
Bureau of Collections & Taxpayer Services
228 East Orange St.
Lancaster, PA
17602
Dear Ms. Hay:
In response to your request, please find the enclosed
documents. As I have stated, you will find copies of articles of
incorporation to seven (7) corporations affiliated to Financial
Management Group, LTD., which is still operating under that
name. As a founder, I incorporated these businesses, however to
my knowledge they never transacted business.
In October of 1988, I sold my interests in Financial
Management Group, LTD., which included a settlement resolving
myself from any future liability associated with the company.
However, I am concerned that these corporations are in
existence, and should be dissolved, especially since I was the
incorporator.
Any information would be appreciated.
Regards,
Stan J. Caterbone
Page 291 of 523
Case 05-23059-ref
Doc 132
Filed 01/12/10
01/15/10
14:57:11v. United
DescStates,
Main et.al.,
U.S. District Entered
Court 16-4014
CATERBONE
Document
Page 22 of 31
Page 292 of 523
Case 05-23059-ref
Doc 132
Filed 01/12/10
01/15/10
14:57:11v. United
DescStates,
Main et.al.,
Court 16-4014
CATERBONE
Document
Page 23 of 31
Page 293 of 523
Case 05-23059-ref
Doc 132
Filed 01/12/10
01/15/10
14:57:11v. United
DescStates,
Main et.al.,
Court 16-4014
CATERBONE
Document
Page 24 of 31
Page 294 of 523
Case 05-23059-ref
Doc 132
Filed 01/12/10
01/15/10
14:57:11v. United
DescStates,
Main et.al.,
Court 16-4014
CATERBONE
Document
Page 25 of 31
Page 295 of 523
Case 05-23059-ref
Doc 132
Filed 01/12/10
01/15/10
14:57:11v. United
DescStates,
Main et.al.,
Court 16-4014
CATERBONE
Document
Page 26 of 31
Page 296 of 523
Case 05-23059-ref
Doc 132
Filed 01/12/10
01/15/10
14:57:11v. United
DescStates,
Main et.al.,
Court 16-4014
CATERBONE
Document
Page 27 of 31
Page 297 of 523
Case 05-23059-ref
Doc 132
Filed 01/12/10
01/15/10
14:57:11v. United
DescStates,
Main et.al.,
Court 16-4014
CATERBONE
Document
Page 28 of 31
Page 298 of 523
Case 05-23059-ref
Doc 132
Filed 01/12/10
01/15/10
14:57:11v. United
DescStates,
Main et.al.,
Court 16-4014
CATERBONE
Document
Page 29 of 31
Page 299 of 523
Case 05-23059-ref
Doc 132
Filed 01/12/10
01/15/10
14:57:11v. United
DescStates,
Main et.al.,
Court 16-4014
CATERBONE
Document
Page 30 of 31
Page 300 of 523
Case 05-23059-ref
Doc 132
Filed 01/12/10
01/15/10
14:57:11v. United
DescStates,
Main et.al.,
U.S. DistrictEntered
Court 16-4014
CATERBONE
Document
Page 31 of 31
Page 301 of 523
budget
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
JAN-02
BIG TICKETS
1101
$2,202
882
$1,764
1241
$2,482
310
9
0
254
9
279
78
261
343
177
1720
$3,440
Mike
357
$268
262
$197
262
$197
340
$255
340
$255
350
$263
350
$263
350
$263
Mike
Greg Prokott
Bill Gahagan
Anne-Marie Fearnow
Ric Anthony
Kevin Ramsier
Scott Napier
Dixie Thornton
Mark Schon
Jim Cushman
TOTALS
Total Email Revenues
$50,041
2429
1170
1001
1956
1886
1494
0
1986
585
797
2918
1010
1504
1656
1980
585
1372
1486
1126
1504
1657
1717
250
11677
$2,102
$4,780
2004
615
1892
1546
1312
1524
1520
1712
984
882
13991
$2,518
$4,173
2675
617
2365
1542
2066
1905
1900
2140
1230
882
17322
$3,118
$4,736
2140
617
1892
1542
1410
1524
1520
1844
984
1323
14796
$2,663
$4,628
900
986
736
1308
1134
640
600
780
406
710
8200
$1,476
$2,082
2250
493
1840
1962
1134
1600
1500
1950
1015
882
14626
$2,633
$3,809
2250
493
1840
1962
1701
1600
1500
1950
1015
882
15193
$2,735
$3,781
960
1530
1170
10456
$1,882
$3,843
1995
615
1906
1516
1277
1436
1530
1716
992
1325
14921
$2,686
$5,363
960
900
1170
9936
$1,788
$4,258
2475
589
2430
2229
1178
1880
1935
2123
1250
0
17001
$3,060
$6,755
882
7963
$1,433
$1,833
1332
8267
$1,488
$1,882
$1,747
$413
$250
$940
$526
$845
$0
$1,165
$192
$443
$935
$301
$635
$470
$0
$5,095
$4,441
$1,294
$182
$343
$821
$340
$625
$436
$697
$389
$5,549
$1,491
$165
$608
$909
$313
$896
$504
$904
$911
$7,286
$1,298
$154
$477
$687
$351
$668
$469
$425
$641
$5,582
$1,262
$154
$473
$580
$354
$608
$290
$434
$301
$4,693
$1,331
$154
$591
$550
$543
$535
$342
$481
$579
$5,337
$1,277
$154
$473
$556
$371
$440
$364
$446
$533
$4,902
$162
$247
$184
$479
$284
$115
$108
$230
$345
$2,257
$821
$123
$460
$353
$296
$378
$270
$639
$553
$4,093
$747
$123
$460
$353
$443
$346
$270
$591
$571
$4,082
$564
$123
$276
$118
$0
$173
$162
$371
$0
$1,854
$466
$123
$368
$0
$0
$173
$275
$375
$0
$1,847
Mike
Greg Prokott
Bill Gahagan
Anne-Marie Fearnow
Ric Anthony
Kevin Ramsier
Scott Napier
Dixie Thornton
Mark Schon
Jim Cushman
TOTALS
Total BT Revenues
432
60
0
294
27
288
0
240
23
122
205
24
182
86
305
18
0
277
29
177
69
194
172
257
0
0
207
16
205
97
58
231
140
1211
$2,422
232
0
0
151
13
167
8
63
62
0
696
$1,392
206
0
0
136
13
96
0
48
179
0
678
$1,356
227
139
9
83
45
57
178
113
851
$1,702
208
171
120
115
6
45
9
29
45
136
144
185
120
194
80
82
303
$606
588
$1,176
523
$1,046
200
$400
197
$394
1800
493
1104
654
1310
493
1472
122
FAXES
EMAIL
TOTAL UNITS
Mike
Greg Prokott
Bill Gahagan
Anne-Marie Fearnow
Rick Anthony
Kevin Ramsier
Scott Napier
Dixie Thornton
Mark Schon
TOTALS
Page 1
Page 302 of 523
Stan J. Caterbone
Freedom From Covert Harassment &
Surveillance,
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-528-2200
November 29, 2016
ACCOUNTS RECIEVABLES TOTALS - $ 3,835,551.65

PRO SE BILLINGS TOTALS $584,327.50 - 147 Court Cases
__________________
TOTAL ACCOUNTS RECIEVABLES - $ 4,419,879.15
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered,
defamed, and publicly discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with
allegations of misconduct and fraud within International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa.
(ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992).
Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation and the truth without the aid of law
enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute and expose public corruption. We
utilize our communications to thwart further libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our
property, and our business. We continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and some
communications are a means of protecting our rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced
Media Group is also a member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed from our Contact
List. How long can Lancaster County and Lancaster City hide me and Continue to Cover-Up my
Whistle Blowing of the ISC Scandel (And the Torture from U.S. Sponsored Mind Control)?
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Valuation ReceivablesPage
ReceivablesPage
Page 303
11of
of
of221
169
23
79
523
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
ACTIVE COURT CASES

7. J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re ALL
FEDERAL LITIGATION TO DATE
8. U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 16-6822 PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI re Case No. 16-1149
MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert
9. U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-3400
MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
10. U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa
Michelle Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650, 08-02982;
11. U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16-cv-1751 PETITION FOR HABEUS CORPUS
12. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Case No. 2016-462 Complaint against
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
13. Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane
14. Superior Court of Pennsylvania Summary Appeal Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016, AMICUS for Kathleen
Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015; 16-1219 Preliminary
Injunction Case of 2016
15. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
16. U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 16-10157
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 304
22of
of
of221
169
23
79
523
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,

STATEMENT
Statement Date
November 29, 2016
Customer ID: 0008
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
Mark Hough, State Farm Agent
14 South Broad Street, No. 14
Lititz, PA 17543
Policy Number -38-EJ-8579-2
Lancaster City Police Incident Report No. 0711-22799
Date
Date Due
Reference
Description
Amount
Balance
02/01/2009
02/01/2009
FC
Invoice of February 1, 2009

Claim for Loss at 1250
Fremont Street
$ 4,202.87
$ 4,202.87
03/01/2009
03/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
$35.02
$ 4,237.89
04/01/2009
04/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
$35.02
$ 4,272.92
05/01/2009
05/01/2009
UD
Updated Claim
$ 6,911.87
$ 6,911.87
06/01/2009
06/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
57.60
$ 6,969.47
07/01/2009
07/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
57.60
$ 7,027.27
08/01/2009
08/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
57.60
$ 7084.67
09/01/2009
09/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
57.60
$ 7,142.27
10/01/2009
11/01/2009
10/01/2009
11/01/2009
FC
FC
Finance Charge
Finance Charge
$
$
57.60
57.60
$ 7,199.87
$7,257.47
12/01/2009
12/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
57.60
$7,257.47
01/01/2010
01/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
57.60
$7,372.67
02/01/2010
02/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
57.60
FC
Finance Charge
$3,052.18
11/29/2016
TOTAL DUE:
$7,430.27
$10,482.45
$10,482.45
FINANCE CHARGE IS AN ANNUALIZED RATE OF 6% COMPOUNDED MONTHLY
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 305
33of
of
of221
169
23
79
523
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,

STATEMENT
Statement Date
November 29, 2016
Customer ID: 0007
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
Lancaster County Treasurer
Lancaster County Courthouse
50 North Duke Street
Lancaster, PA 17602
Date
Date Due
Reference
Description
Amount
Balance
02/01/2009
02/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
5.00
310.49
03/01/2009
03/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
5.00
315.49
04/01/2009
04/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
5.00
320.49
05/01/2009
05/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
5.00
325.49
06/01/2009
06/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
5.00
330.49
07/01/2009
07/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
5.00
335.49
08/01/2009
08/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
5.00
340.49
09/01/2009
09/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
5.00
345.49
10/01/2009
10/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
5.00
350.49
11/01/2009
11/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
5.00
355.49
12/01/2009
12/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
5.00
340.49
01/01/2010
01/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
5.00
345.49
01/01/2010
01/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
5.00
350.49
FC
Finance Charge
$ 143.97
11/29/2016
TOTAL DUE:
494.46
$ 494.46
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 306
44of
of
of221
169
23
79
523
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
Invoice
States,
et.al.,
Invoice
Number:
Advanced Media Group 2007

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
USA
7008
Invoice Date:
May 17, 2007
amgroup01@msn.com
717-427-1621
Voice:
Fax:
Page:
1
Duplicate
Sold To:
Ship to:
Dale R. Denlinger
Clerk of Courts
Lancaster, PA 17602
Lancaster County Treasurer

Lancaster, PA 17602
Customer ID
Customer PO
Payment Terms
0007
C.O.D.
Sales Rep ID
Shipping Method
Ship Date
USPS Priorty
Quantity
Item
Description
Unit Price
District Court Docket No.

NT-0000562-06 Summary Appeal
Docket No. CP-36-SA0000028-2007
Obstruction of Highway Not
Guilty on April 30, 2007 Fines
Collected
Docket No. CP-36-SA0000028-2007
Disorderly Conduct Not Guilty
on April 30, 2007 Fines
Collected
Docket No. CP-36-SA0000028-2007
Harassment Withdrawn on April
30, 2007 Fines Collected
Check No:
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page 307
5 ofof221
169
523
Due Date
5/17/07
Page 35 of 39
Extension
167.20
400.20
377.50
944.90
Subtotal
Sales Tax
Total Invoice Amount
Payment Received
944.90
0.00
TOTAL
944.90
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY

DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-36-SA-0000028-2007
SUMMARY APPEAL DOCKET

Non-Traffic
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Stanley Jay Caterbone
Page 3 of 6
DISPOSITION SENTENCING/PENALTIES
Disposition
Case Event
Sequence/Description
Sentencing Judge
Sentence/Diversion Program Type
Disposition Date
Final Disposition
Section
Offense Disposition
Sentence Date
Credit For Time Served
Incarceration/Diversionary Period
Start Date
Lower Court Proceeding (generic)
Lower Court Disposition
01/22/2007
Not Final
04/30/2007
Final Disposition
Not Guilty
Summary Appeal Trial

1 / Disorder Conduct Hazardous/Physi Off
Reinaker, Dennis E.
Not Guilty
04/30/2007
18 5503 A4
2 / Obstruction Highways
Reinaker, Dennis E.
Not Guilty
04/30/2007
18 5507 A
3 / Harassment - Course of Conduct W/No

Legitimate Purpose
Reinaker, Dennis E.
Nolle Prossed
18 2709 A3
04/30/2007
COMMONWEALTH INFORMATION
ATTORNEY INFORMATION
Name:
Name:
Supreme Court No:
Supreme Court No:

Counsel Status:
Phone Number(s):
AOPC 2220 - Rev 05/04/2007
Printed: 05/04/2007
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the Court of Common Pleas nor the
Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or omissions on these docket sheets. Docket
Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police.
Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page 308
6 ofof221
169
523
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29,
30,
forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
Page 36 of 39
2016
05.17.2007
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page 309
7 ofof221
169
523
Page 37 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page 310
8 ofof221
169
523
Page 38 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page 311
9 ofof221
169
523
Page 39 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
Invoice
States,
et.al.,
Invoice
Number:

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
USA
7008
Invoice Date:
May 17, 2007
amgroup01@msn.com
717-427-1621
Voice:
Fax:
Page:
1
Duplicate
Sold To:
Ship to:
Dale R. Denlinger
Clerk of Courts
Lancaster, PA 17602
MDJ Leo Eckert Jr.

841 Stehman Road
Millersvile, PA 17551
Customer ID
Customer PO
Payment Terms
0007
C.O.D.
Sales Rep ID
Shipping Method
Ship Date
USPS Priorty
Quantity
Item
Description
Unit Price

Docket No. CP-36-SA0000028-2007
Collected
Docket No. CP-36-SA0000028-2007
Collected
Docket No. CP-36-SA0000028-2007
Check No:
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Valuation Receivables
Page
Page312
10 of
of221
169
523
Due Date
5/17/07
Page 1 of 5
Extension
167.20
400.20
377.50
944.90
Subtotal
Sales Tax
Payment Received
944.90
0.00
TOTAL
944.90
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007

DOCKET

Non-Traffic
v.
Page 3 of 6
Disposition
Case Event
Sentencing Judge
Disposition Date
Final Disposition
Section
Offense Disposition
Sentence Date
Start Date
01/22/2007
Not Final
04/30/2007
Final Disposition
Not Guilty

Reinaker, Dennis E.
Not Guilty
04/30/2007
18 5503 A4
Reinaker, Dennis E.
Not Guilty
04/30/2007
18 5507 A

Legitimate Purpose
Reinaker, Dennis E.
Nolle Prossed
18 2709 A3
04/30/2007
Name:
Name:
Supreme Court No:
Supreme Court No:

Counsel Status:
Phone Number(s):
AOPC 2220 - Rev 05/04/2007
Printed: 05/04/2007
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page313
11 of
of221
169
523
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29,
30,
Page 2 of 5
2016
05.17.2007
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page314
12 of
of221
169
523
Page 3 of 5
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page315
13 of
of221
169
523
Page 4 of 5
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page316
14 of
of221
169
523
Page 5 of 5
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
Invoice
States,
et.al.,
Invoice
Number:

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
USA
7008
Invoice Date:
May 17, 2007
amgroup01@msn.com
717-427-1621
Voice:
Fax:
Page:
1
Duplicate
Sold To:
Ship to:
Dale R. Denlinger
Clerk of Courts
Lancaster, PA 17602
MDJ Isaac Stotzfus

14 Center Street
Intercourse, PA 17534
Customer ID
Customer PO
Payment Terms
0007
C.O.D.
Sales Rep ID
Shipping Method
Ship Date
USPS Priorty
Quantity
Item
Description
Unit Price

Docket No. CP-36-SA0000028-2007
Collected
Docket No. CP-36-SA0000028-2007
Collected
Docket No. CP-36-SA0000028-2007
Check No:
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page317
15 of
of221
169
523
Due Date
5/17/07
Page 1 of 5
Extension
167.20
400.20
377.50
944.90
Subtotal
Sales Tax
Payment Received
944.90
0.00
TOTAL
944.90
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007

DOCKET

Non-Traffic
v.
Page 3 of 6
Disposition
Case Event
Sentencing Judge
Disposition Date
Final Disposition
Section
Offense Disposition
Sentence Date
Start Date
01/22/2007
Not Final
04/30/2007
Final Disposition
Not Guilty

Reinaker, Dennis E.
Not Guilty
04/30/2007
18 5503 A4
Reinaker, Dennis E.
Not Guilty
04/30/2007
18 5507 A

Legitimate Purpose
Reinaker, Dennis E.
Nolle Prossed
18 2709 A3
04/30/2007
Name:
Name:
Supreme Court No:
Supreme Court No:

Counsel Status:
Phone Number(s):
AOPC 2220 - Rev 05/04/2007
Printed: 05/04/2007
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page318
16 of
of221
169
523
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29,
30,
Page 2 of 5
2016
05.17.2007
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page319
17 of
of221
169
523
Page 3 of 5
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page320
18 of
of221
169
523
Page 4 of 5
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page321
19 of
of221
169
523
Page 5 of 5
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page322
20 of
of221
169
523
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,

STATEMENT
Statement Date
November 29, 2016
Customer ID: 0006
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
Harlleysville Insurance Company

P.O. Box 198
Harleysville, PA 19438-9919
Claim No.'s:
MD-702274
MO-658554-U XC
MO-6546~9-U XC
Date
Date Due
Reference
Description
Amount
Balance
02/01/2009
02/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
$ 14,782.79
03/01/2009
03/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
135.14
$ 14,917.93
04/1/2009
04/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
135.14
$ 15,053.07
05/1/2009
05/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
135.14
$ 15,188.21
06/1/2009
06/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
135.14
$ 15,323.35
07/1/2009
07/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
135.14
$ 15,458.49
08/1/2009
08/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
135.14
$ 15,593.63
09/1/2009
09/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
135.14
$ 15,728.77
10/1/2009
10/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
135.14
$ 15,863.91
11/1/2009
11/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
135.14
$ 15,999.05
12/1/2009
12/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
135.14
$ 16,134.19
01/1/2010
01/1/2010
FC
Finance Charge
135.14
$ 16,269.33
02/1/2010
02/1/2010
FC
Finance Charge
135.14
$ 16,404.47
FC
Finance Charge
$ 6,738.57
11/29/2016
Phone: 888.595.9876
Fax: 888.492.8954
E-mail: MA@harleysvillegroup.com
TOTAL DUE:
135.14
$23,143.04
$ 23,143.04
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page
Page323
21
5 of
of221
23
79
169
523
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
Invoice
States,
et.al.,
Invoice
Number:

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
USA
7006
Invoice Date:
May 13, 2007
717-799-5915
717-427-1621
Voice:
Fax:
Page:
1
Duplicate
Sold To:
Ship to:
Harleysville Insurance Company

308 Harper Drive
P.O. Box 1016
Moorestown, NJ 08057-0916
Customer ID
Customer PO
Payment Terms
0006
C.O.D.
Sales Rep ID
Shipping Method
Ship Date
USPS Priorty
Quantity
Item
Description
Unit Price
AMG Consulting Income

March 16, 2006 Claim Number 2F
MO-658554-U XC Aainst
Homeowners Policy Number
HOA193468
April 12th, 2006 Claim Number
MO-654619-U XC Against
Homeowners Policy Number
HOA193468
Check No:
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page324
22 of
of221
169
523
Due Date
5/13/07
Page 29 of 39
Extension
7,898.19
7,898.19
Subtotal
Sales Tax
Payment Received
7,898.19
0.00
TOTAL
7,898.19
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page325
23 of
of221
169
523
Office Max
WHERE
PURCHASED
2000
Walmart
SunSetter Online
Cyberwarehouse, Lancaster, PA
Lowes
Ebay
SunSetter Online
Circuit City
SunSetter Rain Guards
DVD/RW Drive
1 4X8 Roofing Sheating
HP Laptop N5101
SunSetter 16X10 Awning
Apple Video 60 GB Ipod
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
Aug-05
37.99
33.70
425.00
1,600.00
1,400.00
9.99
89.99
278.00
4,327.67
33.70
0.00
1,438.00
1,400.00
9.99
89.99
0.00
37.99
598.00
10.00
0.00
25.00
500.00
35.00
150.00
COST TO
REPAIR
LESS
DEDUCTIBLE
Total Page 1
DEPRECIATION
Page 30 of 39
State law requires us to include the following statement - Any person who knowingly files a statement of claim containing any
false or misleading information is subject to criminal and civil penalties.
10 pcs 1X4X8 Pressure Treated Lumber Lowes
Dec-06
Apr-02
Nov-00
Mar-06
Oct-05
Apr-05
2000
Hijoka Plumbing
Rheam RH0900B169002 Hot Water

Heater
Vector Sport Super Spot VEC127Y
598.00
10.00
Mar-06
1 20 Gal Propane Tank
39.99
Mar-06
Kmart, Fuitville Pike, Lancaster,

PA
GR Michells, Willow Street, PA
Sony Digital Recorder ICD-B120
25.00
May-05
1,000.00
May-05
Barnstormers Clipper Stadium
35.00
150.00
Sep-05
1999
DATE
PURCHAS
ED
Lancaster Barnstormers Cap
1991 Dodge Pickup Dakota Registration City Line Auto Sales

Papers
Compaq Desktop SR1300NX
Iomega Zip Drive
ITEM
(Give Full Description)
CLAIM NUMBER: M0-
Page 1 of 2
INSURED: Stanley Caterbone
COST TO
REPLACE
SCHEDULE OF ARTICLES STOLEN, DAMAGED OR DESTROYED
Work In Progress Report As Of April 19 2006 - Updated May 18 2006 3:00 am
$5,732.66
AMOUNT
CLAIMED
ALLOWED
05.17.2007
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page326
24 of
of221
169
523
42.56
2005
SchoolHouse Power Equipment,

Conestoga, PA
Kmart, Fruitville Pike, Lancaster, March, 2006

PA
Little Giant Mower Battery/Tune Up
75.00
Plantronics Earphones
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
6,111.64
LESS
DEDUCTIBLE
Grand Total
1,783.97 Total Page 2
69.00
DEPRECIATION
Page 31 of 39
Motorola Earphone
49.00
743.00
200.00
0.00
0.00
119.00
199.00
199.00
75.00
49.99
Sony DVD/Video Recorder Player
200.00
49.99
149.99
129.99
COST TO
REPAIR
Cash
Cash
Sony Digital Recorder
Kmart, Fruitville Pike, Lancaster, April, 2005

PA
1,200.00
2006
27" Sony TV/DVD Remote Control
Averatec 6200 series with Windows X
119.00
2005
2005
Lowes
Leaf Blower/Vaccum
149.99
2001
EBay Auction Site
129.99
Sony 19" Television
May-05
DATE
PURCHAS
ED
WHERE
PURCHASED
CD Rom Drive HP Desktop Computer
ITEM
CLAIM NUMBER: M0-
COST TO
REPLACE
Work In Progress Report As Of April 19 2006 - Updated May 18 2006 3:00 am
$7,898.19
2,165.53
AMOUNT
CLAIMED
ALLOWED
05.17.2007
Page 32 of 39
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page327
25 of
of221
169
523
C-I 139nj (4101)
Sign Here
Dated
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
05.17.2007
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
Invoice
Invoice Number:

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
USA
Voice:
Fax:
7007
Invoice Date:
May 15, 2007
amgroup01@msn.com
717-427-1621
Page:
Duplicate
Sold To:
Ship to:

308 Harper Drive
P.O. Box 1016
Moorestown, NJ 08057-0916
Customer ID
Customer PO
Payment Terms
0006
C.O.D.
Sales Rep ID
Shipping Method
Ship Date
USPS Priorty
Quantity
Item
Description
Unit Price
May 15, 2007 Claim Number

MO-702274 Does Not Include
Time Management Calenders
and Desktop Calenders
Check No:
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page328
26 of
of221
169
523
Due Date
5/15/07
Page 33 of 39
Extension
6,878.25
6,878.25
Subtotal
Sales Tax
Payment Received
6,878.25
0.00
TOTAL
6,878.25
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page329
27 of
of221
169
523
1-Tetra Pond High Volume Filter

1- Tetra High Volume Pump
1-6 Person Picnic Table
1-Digging Iron
1-Gas Powered Weed Eater
1-3 Ft. Saint Francis Stone Fountain and Statue
1-Central Security System Control Panel w/9 Motion Detectors
1-Chimney Screen
1-Free Standing Kodiak Wood Stove & Cleaning Tools
1-Aiwa Receivers
2-Omnis Surround Sound Shelf Speakers
1-Saint Francis Childrens Book by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
1-Fillings Dress Overcoat
1-Hair Dryer
4-100 pt Cotton Dress Shirts
1-Black Western Belt
1-The Springs White Robe
3-Hooded Sweatshirts, Pflumm, Stone Harbor Beach Patrol
1-Blackberry
1-SONY Digital Mavica Camera & Accessories
300-Newspapers for Litigation
7-Patio Blinds
100 Drill Bits and Drivers
18 Volt Dewalt Hammer Drill
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
11
2
8
WHERE
04/15/05 eBAY Auction

Lowes Store, Lancaster, PA
02/01/98 Home Depot, Lancaster, PA
04/06/05 eBAY Auction

05/17/99 Office Max, Sunrise, FL
Lancaster Newspapers
07/10/06 Lowes Store, Lancaster, PA
Misc Purchases
01/10/96 Carters Lumber Supply, Lancaster, PA
05/06/01 That Fish Place, Lancaster, PA

05/15/01 Online Purchase
Family Hierloom From Childhood
Pflumm Contractors, not purchased
06/01/02 Gift from Ben Roda
07/15/01 Gift from Pam Pflumm & Family
08/26/05 Yarnell Security System
02/01/04 Home Depot, Lancaster, PA
11/15/05 Newspater Advertisement, Conestoga, PA
01/08/00 Costco, Lancaster, PA
01/25/00 David Porter, Lancaster, PA
12/08/05 Amazon Books
02/15/86 Fillings Mens Store
Gift from Yolanda Caterbone
06/25/05 Kohls Department Store, Lancaster, PA
12/25/01 Gift from Pam Pflumm & Family
08/05/05 The Springs, Pismo Beach, CA
PURCHASED
PURCHASED
07/01/02 Sunsetter Inc - Online
05/05/99 Brian Langsett of Conestoga,PA
Pep Boys, Wallmart, etc, Lancaster, PA
WHEN
Page 34 of 39
C-I 139nj (4101)

1-Harmony Universal USB Remote Control

1-Roll 36" X 100 Ft Plastic Sheeting
1-36" Metal T-Square
Daily Time Management Business Calenders 1986-1991
Each Daily Page has business notes and meeting notes that is part
of my Federal Litigation for Personal and Advanced Media Group 052288;06-4650;06-3955;etc.
Desktop Monthly Calenders 1997 to 2000
5
8
6
6
45
11
5
6
1.5
3
1
7
7
1
21
4
1.5
5
1.5
AGE OF ITEM

1-New Not Used 10X18 Ft. Sun Setter Awning
1-Low Volume High Pressure Paint Sprayer
15-Miscellaneous Automobile Waxes, Compounds, and Cleaners

CLAIM NUMBER: M0-702274
ITEM
TOTAL
05.17.2007
$6,878.25
$103.00
$24.00
$29.99
$133.32
$69.00
$150.00
$75.00
$89.00
$69.00
$1,800.00
$49.00
$600.00
$179.00
$169.00
$49.00
$399.95
$29.00
$120.00
$69.00
$59.00
$79.00
$155.00
$741.99
$100.00
$79.00
$200.00
$150.00
REPLACE
$300.00
$708.00
$100.00
COST TO
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page330
28 of
of221
169
523
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,

STATEMENT
Statement Date
November 29, 2016
Customer ID: 0005
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
Drew Anthon, Owner
Eden Resort Inn
222 Eden Road
Lancaster, PA 17601
Case No. CI-05-03644 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas
Date
Date Due
Reference
Description
Amount
Balance
02/01/2009
02/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
$ 29,244.02
03/01/2009
03/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
269.81
$ 29,513.83
04/1/2009
04/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
269.81
$ 29,783.64
05/1/2009
05/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
269.81
$ 30,053.45
06/1/2009
06/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
269.81
$ 30,323.26
07/1/2009
07/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
269.81
$ 30,593.07
08/1/2009
08/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
269.81
$ 30,862.88
09/1/2009
09/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
269.81
$ 31,132.69
10/1/2009
10/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
269.81
$ 31,402.50
11/1/2009
11/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
269.81
$ 31,672.31
12/1/2009
12/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
269.81
$ 31,942.12
01/1/2010
01/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
269.81
$ 32,211.33
02/1/2010
02/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
269.81
$ 32,481.14
FC
Finance Charge
$13,342.49
$45,823.63
11/29/2016
TOTAL DUE:
269.81
$ 45,823.63
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page
Page331
29
6 of
of221
23
79
169
523
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
Invoice

States,
et.al.,
Invoice
Number:

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
USA
7005
Invoice Date:
May 13, 2007
amgroup01@msn.com
717-427-1621
Voice:
Fax:
Page:
1
Duplicate
Sold To:
Ship to:
Drew Anthon - Eden Resort Inn

222 Eden Road
Lancaster, PA 17601
Customer ID
Customer PO
Payment Terms
0005
C.O.D.
Sales Rep ID
Shipping Method
Ship Date
USPS Priorty
Quantity
Item
Description
Unit Price
Medical Expenses, Legal Costs,

and Adminstration Costs
Associated with CI-05-03644
Check No:
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page332
30 of
of221
169
523
Due Date
5/13/07
Page 23 of 39
Extension
24,118.00
24,118.00
Subtotal
Sales Tax
Payment Received
24,118.00
0.00
TOTAL
24,118.00
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

CIVIL DIVISION
PROJECT HOPE
220 Stone Hill Road
Conestoga, PA 17516
Plaintiff
Case No. CI-05-03644
DREW ANTHON,
(MA)EDEN RESORT INN
222 Eden Road
Lancaster, PA 17601
Defendant
NOTICE
ITEMS FOR CLAIM
Plaintiff files the following ITEMS FOR CLAIM.
1.
Plaintiff filed the civil action in good faith and did suffer substantial stress related health
problems that that were triggered when the Plaintiff read the Lancaster Newspapers Intelligencer
article regarding the same (Tea Party) as well as business financial losses.
2.
Medical Expenses from Lower Back Pain Due To Stress Excelsior Place Business Plan Fees UPS Store Lost Opportunity SUB TOTAL
ATTORNEY FEES AND ADMINISTRATION TOTAL -
$5,184.00
$7,000.00
$10,000.00
___________
$22,118.00
2,000.00
$24,118.00
I hereby certify that appropriate Notices Items For Claim has been mailed in accordance with PA R.C.P.
237.1 on the dales indicated on the Notices.
STAN J. CATERBONE
PROJECT HOPE
By:______________________________
STAN J. CATERBONE, Pro Se
DREW ANTHON,
(MA)EDEN RESORT INN
Plaintiffs address is:
Stan J. Caterbone, 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA 17516 And that the last know11 address of the
Defendant is: 222 Eden Road, Lancaster, PA 17601
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page333
31 of
of221
169
523
Page 24 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007

CIVIL DIVISION
PROJECT HOPE
Plaintiff
DREW ANTHON,
(MA)EDEN RESORT INN
Defendant
NOTICE OF JUDGMENT OR ORDER
TO:
( ) Plaintiff
(XX) Defendant
( )Garnishee
You are hereby notified that the following
Order or Judgment was entered against you
On January 20, 2006
(XX) Assumpsit Judgment in the amount
of $11,000 plus costs.
( )
Trespass Judgment in the amount

of $_________ plus costs.
( )
If not satisfied within sixty (60)
days, your motor vehicle operator'$ license and/or registration
will be suspended by the Department of Transportation, Bureau
of Traffic Safety, Harrisburg, PA
(XX) Entry of Judgment of
( ) Court Order
( ) Non-Pros
( ) Confession
(xx) Default
( ) Verdict
( ) Arbitration
Award
Prothonotary
By: ______________________________
PROTHONOTARY (OR DEPUTY)
DREW ANTHON,
(MA)EDEN RESORT INN
222 Eden Road, Lancaster, PA 17601
Plaintiffs address is:
Stan J. Caterbone, 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA 17516 717-799-5915
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page334
32 of
of221
169
523
Page 25 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007

CIVIL DIVISION
PROJECT HOPE
Plaintiff
DREW ANTHON,
(MA)EDEN RESORT INN
Defendant
IMPORTANT NOTICE
TO:
DREW ANTHON,
(MA)EDEN RESORT INN
222 Eden Road, Lancaster, PA 17601
Date of Notice: January 20, 2006

YOU ARE IN DEFAULT BECAUSE YOU HAVE FAILED TO ENTER A WRITTEN
APPEARANCE PERSONALLY OR BY ATTORNEY AND FILE IN WRITING WITH THE COURT YOUR
DEFENSES OR OBJECTIONS TO THE CLAIMS SET FORTH AGAINST YOU UNLESS YOU ACT
WITHIN TEN DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE, A JUDGMENT MAY BE ENTERED
AGAINST YOU WITHOUT A HEARING AND YOU MAY LOSE YOUR PROPERTY OR OTHER
IMPORTANT RIGHTS. YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS PAPER TO YOUR LAWYER AT ONCE. IF YOU DO
NOT HAVE A LAWYER, GO TO OR TELEPHONE THE FOLLOWING OFFICE SET FORTH BELOW.
THIS OFFICE CAN PROVIDE YOU WITH INFORMATION ABOUT HIRING A LAWYER. IF YOU
CANNOT AFFORD TO HIRE A LAWYER, THIS OFFICE MAY BE ABLE TI PROVIDE YOU WITH
INFORMATION ABOUT AGENCIES THAT MAY OFFER LEGAL SERVICES TO ELIGIBLE PERSONS
AT A REDUCED FEE OR NO FEE.
LANCASTER COUNTY COURT ADMINISTRATOR'S OFFICE
50 NORTH DUKE STREET
P.O. BOX 3480
LANCASTER, PA 17602
(717) 299-8041
BY: _______________________________
STAN J. CATERBONE
PROJECT HOPE/ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
220 Stone Hill Road
Conestoga, PA 17516
717-799-5915
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page335
33 of
of221
169
523
Page 26 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
make the following civil complaint against the defendant, Drew Anthon and Eden Resort Inn and Conference
Center:
Plaintiff alleges Drew Anthon and the Eden Resort Inn and Conference Center has colluded to sabotage the
Downtown Lancaster Convention Center project by organizing a formal request and soliciting support to
certain Lancaster County Hoteliers to voluntarily withhold the payment of the Lancaster County Hotel Room
Tax, thereby placing the financial interests of the Business Plan for the Excelsior Property of East King Street
and the Rights to develop a UPS Store in or around the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center at extreme
risk.
Plaintiff will argue that such financial risk is causing mental stress and duress, that otherwise would not be
present, had the defendant not engaged the above-mentioned activities.
Plaintiff seeks the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to place a sees and desist order against the defendants
actions to withhold the Hotel tax until the defendants can prove to the Commonwealth the said actions are in the
best interests of the Plaintiffs interests and those of all major stakeholders of the proposed Downtown Lancaster
Convention Center, including the School District of Lancaster, the City of Lancaster, the County of Lancaster,
Penn Square Partners, as well as others. Thus the defendants must prove that the Downtown Lancaster
Convention Center will fail.
Plaintiff submits the following exhibits for considerations of the Courts:
x The major pages of the website of Advanced Media Group
x The Excelsior Place Business Plan
x The Agreement Between Art Ward, Owner of the UPS Store and Stan Caterbone
Plaintiff seeks a jury trial with damages in excess of $10,000.
Stan J. Caterbone/Project Hope/Advanced Media Group

Dated: April 26, 2005
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page336
34 of
of221
169
523
Page 27 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
Businessman, irked by hotelier action, files suit

By Justin Quinn
Intelligencer Journal
Published: May 06, 2005 9:47 AM EST
LANCASTER COUNTY, PA - A local businessman filed a $100,000 lawsuit last

month against Drew Anthon, owner of Eden Resort Inn and Conference Center, claiming
Anthon "colluded to sabotage" the proposed Lancaster County Convention Center by
announcing his intention to withhold the county hotel room tax.
Conestoga resident Stan J. Caterbone is asking that a local judge place a "sees (sic)
and desist order" on Anthon and the hotel to prevent them from withholding the room
tax.
The suit was filed April 26, the day the Intelligencer Journal reported Anthon and
several other hoteliers were threatening to withhold payment of the room tax, most of
which goes toward a hotel and convention center proposed for Penn Square. The next
room tax payment is due May 26.
Caterbone is founder of Advanced Media Group, 1857 Colonial Village Lane, an
information technologies company specializing in optical publishing. He claims in the
lawsuit that Anthon's actions place "at extreme risk" Caterbone's plans to develop a UPS
store and an office complex called "Excelsior Place" across from the proposed convention
center. "Plaintiff will argue that such financial risk is causing mental stress and duress that
otherwise would not be present, had the defendant not engaged (in) the above-mentioned
activities," Caterbone says in the suit.
The suit asks for a court order to force the hoteliers to pay the tax "until the
defendants can prove to the commonwealth the said actions are in the best interests of
the (plaintiff) and those of all major stakeholders of the proposed downtown Lancaster
convention center, including School District of Lancaster, the City of Lancaster, the County
of Lancaster, Penn Square Partners, as well as others. Thus, the defendants must prove
that the downtown Lancaster convention center will fail."
A person who answered the phone at the number listed in the lawsuit as
Caterbone's did not identify himself. "All the information is public," the man said when
asked about the suit. "You can go there."
As exhibits, the lawsuit includes Web pages from Caterbone's company and a bound
volume titled "The Excelsior Place Business Plan."
The suit also includes a handwritten agreement between Caterbone and Art Ward,
owner of the UPS Store. Anthon did not return a reporter's phone calls. A judge has not
been assigned to the case.
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page337
35 of
of221
169
523
Page 28 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page338
36 of
of221
169
523
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,

STATEMENT
Statement Date
November 29, 2016
Customer ID: 0003
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
High Industries
1833 William Penn Way
Greenfield Industrial Park
Lancaster, PA 17601
Date
Date Due
Reference
Description
Amount
Balance
02/01/2009
02/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
$ 18,724.22
03/01/2009
03/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
171.17
$ 18,895.39
04/1/2009
04/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
171.17
$ 19,066.56
05/1/2009
05/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
171.17
$ 19,237.73
06/1/2009
06/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
171.17
$ 19,408.90
07/1/2009
07/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
171.17
$ 19,580.07
08/1/2009
08/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
171.17
$ 19,751.24
09/1/2009
09/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
171.17
$ 19,922.41
10/1/2009
10/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
171.17
$ 20,093.58
11/1/2009
11/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
171.17
$ 20,264.75
12/1/2009
12/1/2009
FC
Finance Charge
171.17
$ 20,435.92
01/1/2010
01/1/2010
FC
Finance Charge
171.17
$ 20,607.09
02/1/2010
02/1/2010
FC
Finance Charge
171.17
$ 20,778.26
FC
Finance Charge
$8,535.22
$ 29,313.48
11/29/2016
TOTAL DUE:
171.17
$ 29,313.48
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page
Page339
37
7 of
of221
23
79
169
523
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
Invoice

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
USA
Invoice Number:
7003
Invoice Date:
Apr 27, 2007
Voice:
Fax:
Page:
amgroup01@msn.com
717-427-1621
Ship To
Sold To:
High Industries
1833 William Penn Way
Greenfiled Industrial Park
Lancaster, PA 17601
______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
Customer ID
Customer PO
Payment Terms
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0003
C.O.D.
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Rep
Shipping Method
Ship Date
Due Date
|
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
| 4/27/07
USPS Priorty
______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
______________________________________________________________________________________________
| Extension
|
|
|
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
Quantity |
Item
Description
Unit Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,200.00 |
|
|
| 1991 Past Due Invoice for
|
|
|
|
| CD-ROM mastering and
|
|
|
|
|
| replication from NIST,
|
|
|
|
|
| Commodore (Titus), AMP, etc.,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
Interest
to
Date
10,021.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| at 10% per Annum Compounded
|
|
|
|
|
| Annually.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
Subtotal
Sales Tax
Payment Received
Check No:
TOTAL
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page340
38 of
of221
169
523
Page 7 of 39
15,221.40
15,221.40
0.00
$15,221.40
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page341
39 of
of221
169
523
Page 8 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page342
40 of
of221
169
523
Page 9 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page343
41 of
of221
169
523
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,

STATEMENT
Statement Date
November 29, 2016
Customer ID: 0004
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
Fulton Bank of Fulton Financial Corporation
Accounts Payable
One Penn Square
Lancaster, PA 17602
220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA
Foreclosure Overcharge Case No. CI-07-00019 and Case No. CI-06-02271
Date
Date Due
Reference Description
Amount
Balance
02/01/2009
02/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
$ 82,170.02
03/01/2009
03/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 82,921.19
04/01/2009
04/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 83,672.36
05/01/2009
05/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 84,423.53
06/01/2009
06/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 85,174.70
07/01/2009
07/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 85,925.87
08/01/2009
08/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 86,677.04
09/01/2009
09/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 87,428.21
10/01/2009
10/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 88,179.38
11/01/2009
11/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 88,930.55
12/01/2009
12/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 89,681.72
01/01/2010
01/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 90,432.85
02/01/2010
02/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 91,184.02
FC
Finance Charge
$37,456.27
11/29/2016
TOTAL DUE:
751.17
$128,640.29
$128,640.29
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page
Page344
42
8 of
of221
23
79
169
523
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
Invoice

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
USA
Invoice Number:
7004
Invoice Date:
May 13, 2007
Voice:
Fax:
Page:
717-799-5915
717-427-1621
1
Duplicate
Sold To:
Ship To
Fulton Bank/Lanc Co Sheriff

One Penn Square
Lancaster, PA 17602
Lancaster County Sheriff Dept.

Lancaster, PA 17602
______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
Customer ID
Customer PO
Payment Terms
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0004
C.O.D.
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Rep
Shipping Method
Ship Date
Due Date
|
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
| 5/13/07
USPS Priorty
______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
______________________________________________________________________________________________
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
| Extension
|
Quantity |
Item
Description
Unit Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 220 Stone Hill Road Property |
|
|
|
|
| Fair Market Value Less Sales
|
|
|
|
|
| Proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
| Average Fair Market Value per
|
|
|
217,454.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fulton
Bank
Form
1099-A;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parula Property Realty
|
|
|
|
|
| Transfer Tax Statement of
|
|
|
|
|
| Value; Real Estate Appraisals
|
|
|
|
|
| December 20, 2006 Sheriff Sale
|
| -156,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Auction Price
|
|
|
17,306.00 |
|
|
| February 1, 2007 Disbursement
|
|
|
|
| Check To Stan J. Caterbone
|
|
|
|
|
| Barley Snyder Lecal Fees &
|
|
-9,612.80 |
|
|
| Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-2,000.00 |
|
|
| Sheriff Dept Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
Sales Tax
Payment Received
Check No:
TOTAL
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page345
43 of
of221
169
523
Page 10 of 39
67,147.45
67,147.45
0.00
$67,147.45
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
220 Stone Hill Road Documented

Fair Market Values In Year 2006
Average From 4 Fair Market Values = $217,454.25
1.
220 Stone Hill Rd, Conestoga, PA 17516

ZESTIMATE: $213,999
Value Range: $194,739 - $301,739
02/24/2006
1.

ZESTIMATE: $220,866
09/21/2006
2.
FULTON BANK FORM 1099-A

Fair Market Value of Property (Box 4): $250,000
Tax Year 2006
3.
REALTY TRANSFER TAX

STATEMENT OF VALUE
Box 6. Fair Market Value = 184,952.00
$ 217,454.25 Average Fair Market Value
$ 156,000.00 Sheriff Sale Price of Auction
$ 61,454.25 Fair Market Value Not Realized (Extortion)
$ 89,125.78 Mortgage Balance As of June 2005
$ 44,111,04 Total Attorney Fees and Costs
$ 20,000.00 Estimated Overcharge By Barley Snyder, LLC
$
3,000.00 Estimated Overcharge By Sheriffs Department
$ 84,454.25 Amount Owed By Fulton Bank And Lancaster

County Sheriffs Department
$ 17,306.80 Amount of Disbursement
$ 67,147.45 Balance Due
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page346
44 of
of221
169
523
Page 11 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page347
45 of
of221
169
523
Page 12 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
Zillow.com - Data & Graphs - Real Estate Value, Local Real Estate
Trends
http://www.zillow.com/Charts.z?chartDuration=1year&zpid=9692127
U.S.
District
Court 16-4014 CATERBONE v. United States, et.al.,

ZESTIMATE:
$213,999
Value Range: $194,739 - $301,739
Market Value Change Show: $ Dollar | % Percentage

Time frame: 1yr| 5yr| 10yr|
Compare:
This home
17516
Conestoga
Lancaster
PA
USA
Show sales
Zestimate Rankings
This home at $213,999 is valued higher than:
Zindex (Median Zestimate)
64% of homes in 17516 ZIP code
$186,718
63% of homes in Conestoga
$186,674
72% of homes in Lancaster County
$169,051
65% of homes in PA state
$186,373
40% of homes in United States
$261,421
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page348
46 of
of221
169
523
1 of 2
Page 13 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
2/24/2006 4:12 PM
05.17.2007
Trends
U.S.
District
Historical Value Trends Show as: n

i% n
j
k
l
m
j$ n
k
l
m
j % annualized
k
l
m
Past:
This home
17516
Conestoga
Lancaster
PA
US
30 days
0.7%
0.9%
1.3%
0.7%
-13%
0.6%
1 year
17%
15%
15%
12%
4.4%
21%
5 years
63%
57%
58%
52%
77%
90%
10 years
--
--
--
--
111%
104%
Last sale ()
--
--
--
--
--
--
Tax Information
2005
Property tax:
$2,519
Assessed value bldgs:
$96,400
Assessed value land:
$55,200
Total assessed value:
$151,600
Sale History
No sale history is available for this home
2006 Zillow.com, All Rights Reserved
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page349
47 of
of221
169
523
2 of 2
Page 14 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
2/24/2006 4:12 PM
05.17.2007
Zillow - 220 Stone Hill Rd, Conestoga, PA 17516
1 of 4
http://www.zillow.com/HomeDetails.htm?city=Conestoga&state=PA&z...
Welcome amgroup01! (Not amgroup01? Sign out.)

ZESTIMATE: $220,866
View large map

View maps side-by-side
Map comparable homes
Home Facts
Public Facts
Owner's Facts
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page350
48 of
of221
169
523
Page 15 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
9/21/2006 11:58 AM
2 of 4
Home Facts
Owner Facts
Residence:
Single family
Bedrooms:
Bathrooms:
2.0
Sq ft:
1,060
Lot size:
82,764 sq ft / 1.90 acres
Year built:
1995
Year updated:
--
# Stories:
Total rooms:
Basement:
Finished
Roof type:
Asphalt
Primary exterior material:
--
View:
--
Primary parking type:
Garage - Attached
Covered parking spaces:
--
Primary heating source:
--
Primary heating system:
Heat pump
Primary cooling system:
Central
Architectural style:
--
Fireplace:
Yes
Swimming pool:
--
Waterfront:
--
County:
Lancaster
Parcel #: 1203252300000
Zillow Home ID:
9692127
Legal description: --
Are you the owner?

Learn More
Learn More
Zestimate: $220,866
Show fewer home facts
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page351
49 of
of221
169
523
Page 16 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
9/21/2006 11:58 AM
Zillow.com - Real Estate Search Results

States,
Page
1 ofet.al.,
2
Showing 10 comparable recent sales for 220 Stone Hill Rd, Conestoga, PA 17516
2006 NAVTEQ | 2006 GlobeXplorer and Suppliers | 2006 Proxix

Comparable
recent sales
Sold
Price
Date Sold
BR BA Home Lot
Home
(sq ft) (sq ft) $/sq
ft
Lot
$/sq
ft
Year
Built
Dist
(mi)
220 Stone
Hill Rd
--
--
1,060
82,764 $196
$3
1995
--
213 Stone Hill

Rd
$208,000 05/15/2006 3
1,096
82,764 $190
$3
1998
0.08
561 Stone Hill

Rd
$260,000 01/24/2006 3
1.5 1,304
82,764 $199
$3
1997
0.43
101 W Elm St
$210,000 06/01/2006 3
1.5 1,516
19,602 $139
$11
1974
0.48
15 Orchard Ln
$163,000 04/10/2006 4
1.5 1,028
16,552 $159
$10
1985
0.41
5 Orchard Ln
$162,500 07/06/2005 3
1.5 994
16,552 $163
$10
1984
0.33
3455 Main St
$182,900 10/04/2005 4
1,456
16,988 $126
$11
1930
0.35
410 Kendig Rd
$175,000 01/05/2006 3
1,272
30,927 $138
$6
1963
0.67
2834 Main St
$129,000 11/30/2005 3
1,105
21,780 $117
$6
1942
0.56
24 E Elm St
$143,000 07/22/2005 3
1,344
17,424 $106
$8
1946
0.65
70 River
Corner Rd
$159,900 10/12/2005 4
1,841
8,276
$19
1890
0.45
Averages
$179,330 --
1.5 1,296
$9
--
--
$87
31,363 $142
Choose your comps with My Zestimator
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page352
50 of
of221
169
523
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
http://www.zillow.com/search/Search.htm?expand=false&mode=comps&zpid=9692127
7/10/2006
Page 17 of 39
05.17.2007
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page353
51 of
of221
169
523
Page 18 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page354
52 of
of221
169
523
Page 19 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page355
53 of
of221
169
523
Page 20 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page356
54 of
of221
169
523
Page 21 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page357
55 of
of221
169
523
Page 22 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page358
56 of
of221
169
523
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,

STATEMENT
Statement Date
November 29, 2016
Customer ID: 0004
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
Lancaster County Sheriff
Lancaster County Sheriffs Department
Lancaster, PA 17602

Foreclosure Overcharge
Date
Date Due
Reference
Description
Amount
Balance
02/01/2009
02/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
$ 82,170.02
03/01/2009
03/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 82,921.19
04/01/2009
04/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 83,672.36
05/01/2009
05/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 84,423.53
06/01/2009
06/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 85,174.70
07/01/2009
07/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 85,925.87
08/01/2009
08/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 86,677.04
09/01/2009
09/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 87,428.21
10/01/2009
10/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 88,179.38
11/01/2009
11/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 88,930.55
12/01/2009
12/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 89,681.72
01/01/2010
01/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 90,432.85
02/01/2010
02/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 91,184.02
FC
Finance Charge
$37,456.27
11/29/2016
TOTAL DUE:
751.17
$128,640.29
$128,640.29
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page
Page359
57
9 of
of221
23
79
169
523
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
Invoice

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
USA
Invoice Number:
7004
Invoice Date:
May 13, 2007
Voice:
Fax:
Page:
717-799-5915
717-427-1621
1
Duplicate
Sold To:
Ship To

One Penn Square
Lancaster, PA 17602

Lancaster, PA 17602
______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
Customer ID
Customer PO
Payment Terms
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0004
C.O.D.
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Rep
Shipping Method
Ship Date
Due Date
|
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
| 5/13/07
USPS Priorty
______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
______________________________________________________________________________________________
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
| Extension
|
Quantity |
Item
Description
Unit Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217,454.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fulton
Bank
Form
1099-A;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| -156,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Auction Price
|
|
|
17,306.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-9,612.80 |
|
|
| Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-2,000.00 |
|
|
| Sheriff Dept Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
Sales Tax
Payment Received
Check No:
TOTAL
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page360
58 of
of221
169
523
Page 10 of 39
67,147.45
67,147.45
0.00
$67,147.45
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007

1.

ZESTIMATE: $213,999
Value Range: $194,739 - $301,739
02/24/2006
1.

ZESTIMATE: $220,866
09/21/2006
2.

Tax Year 2006
3.
REALTY TRANSFER TAX

STATEMENT OF VALUE
$

ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page361
59 of
of221
169
523
Page 11 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page362
60 of
of221
169
523
Page 12 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
Trends
U.S.
District

ZESTIMATE:
$213,999
Value Range: $194,739 - $301,739

Compare:
This home
17516
Conestoga
Lancaster
PA
USA
Show sales
Zestimate Rankings
$186,718
$186,674
$169,051
$186,373
$261,421
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page363
61 of
of221
169
523
1 of 2
Page 13 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
2/24/2006 4:12 PM
05.17.2007
Trends
U.S.
District

i% n
j
k
l
m
j$ n
k
l
m
j % annualized
k
l
m
Past:
This home
17516
Conestoga
Lancaster
PA
US
30 days
0.7%
0.9%
1.3%
0.7%
-13%
0.6%
1 year
17%
15%
15%
12%
4.4%
21%
5 years
63%
57%
58%
52%
77%
90%
10 years
--
--
--
--
111%
104%
Last sale ()
--
--
--
--
--
--
Tax Information
2005
Property tax:
$2,519
$96,400
$55,200
$151,600
Sale History
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page364
62 of
of221
169
523
2 of 2
Page 14 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
2/24/2006 4:12 PM
05.17.2007
1 of 4

ZESTIMATE: $220,866
View large map

Home Facts
Public Facts
Owner's Facts
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page365
63 of
of221
169
523
Page 15 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
9/21/2006 11:58 AM
2 of 4
Home Facts
Owner Facts
Residence:
Single family
Bedrooms:
Bathrooms:
2.0
Sq ft:
1,060
Lot size:
82,764 sq ft / 1.90 acres
Year built:
1995
Year updated:
--
# Stories:
Total rooms:
Basement:
Finished
Roof type:
Asphalt
--
View:
--
Garage - Attached
--
--
Heat pump
Central
--
Fireplace:
Yes
Swimming pool:
--
Waterfront:
--
County:
Lancaster
Parcel #: 1203252300000
Zillow Home ID:
9692127
Are you the owner?

Learn More
Learn More
Zestimate: $220,866
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page366
64 of
of221
169
523
Page 16 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
9/21/2006 11:58 AM

States,
Page
1 ofet.al.,
2

Comparable
recent sales
Sold
Price
Date Sold
BR BA Home Lot
Home
ft
Lot
$/sq
ft
Year
Built
Dist
(mi)
220 Stone
Hill Rd
--
--
1,060
82,764 $196
$3
1995
--
213 Stone Hill

Rd
$208,000 05/15/2006 3
1,096
82,764 $190
$3
1998
0.08
561 Stone Hill

Rd
$260,000 01/24/2006 3
1.5 1,304
82,764 $199
$3
1997
0.43
101 W Elm St
$210,000 06/01/2006 3
1.5 1,516
19,602 $139
$11
1974
0.48
15 Orchard Ln
$163,000 04/10/2006 4
1.5 1,028
16,552 $159
$10
1985
0.41
5 Orchard Ln
$162,500 07/06/2005 3
1.5 994
16,552 $163
$10
1984
0.33
3455 Main St
$182,900 10/04/2005 4
1,456
16,988 $126
$11
1930
0.35
410 Kendig Rd
$175,000 01/05/2006 3
1,272
30,927 $138
$6
1963
0.67
2834 Main St
$129,000 11/30/2005 3
1,105
21,780 $117
$6
1942
0.56
24 E Elm St
$143,000 07/22/2005 3
1,344
17,424 $106
$8
1946
0.65
70 River
Corner Rd
$159,900 10/12/2005 4
1,841
8,276
$19
1890
0.45
Averages
$179,330 --
1.5 1,296
$9
--
--
$87
31,363 $142
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page367
65 of
of221
169
523
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
7/10/2006
Page 17 of 39
05.17.2007
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page368
66 of
of221
169
523
Page 18 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page369
67 of
of221
169
523
Page 19 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page370
68 of
of221
169
523
Page 20 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page371
69 of
of221
169
523
Page 21 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page372
70 of
of221
169
523
Page 22 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page373
71 of
of221
169
523
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,

STATEMENT
Statement Date
November 29, 2016
Customer ID: 0004
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
Shawn Long, Esq.,
Barley Snyder, LLC
126 East King Street
Lancaster, PA 17602

Foreclosure Overcharge
Date
Date Due
Reference
Description
Amount
Balance
02/01/2009
02/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
$ 82,170.02
03/01/2009
03/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 82,921.19
04/01/2009
04/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 83,672.36
05/01/2009
05/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 84,423.53
06/01/2009
06/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 85,174.70
07/01/2009
07/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 85,925.87
08/01/2009
08/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 86,677.04
09/01/2009
09/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 87,428.21
10/01/2009
10/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 88,179.38
11/01/2009
11/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 88,930.55
12/01/2009
12/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 89,681.72
01/01/2010
01/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 90,432.85
02/01/2010
02/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
751.17
$ 91,184.02
FC
Finance Charge
$37,456.27
11/29/2016
TOTAL DUE:
751.17
$128,640.29
$128,640.29
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page
Page374
72
10of
of221
169
523
23
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
Invoice

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
USA
Invoice Number:
7004
Invoice Date:
May 13, 2007
Voice:
Fax:
Page:
717-799-5915
717-427-1621
1
Duplicate
Sold To:
Ship To

One Penn Square
Lancaster, PA 17602

Lancaster, PA 17602
______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
Customer ID
Customer PO
Payment Terms
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0004
C.O.D.
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Rep
Shipping Method
Ship Date
Due Date
|
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
| 5/13/07
USPS Priorty
______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
______________________________________________________________________________________________
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
| Extension
|
Quantity |
Item
Description
Unit Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217,454.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fulton
Bank
Form
1099-A;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| -156,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Auction Price
|
|
|
17,306.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-9,612.80 |
|
|
| Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-2,000.00 |
|
|
| Sheriff Dept Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
Sales Tax
Payment Received
Check No:
TOTAL
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page375
73 of
of221
169
523
Page 10 of 39
67,147.45
67,147.45
0.00
$67,147.45
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007

1.

ZESTIMATE: $213,999
Value Range: $194,739 - $301,739
02/24/2006
1.

ZESTIMATE: $220,866
09/21/2006
2.

Tax Year 2006
3.
REALTY TRANSFER TAX

STATEMENT OF VALUE
$

ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page376
74 of
of221
169
523
Page 11 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page377
75 of
of221
169
523
Page 12 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
Trends
U.S.
District

ZESTIMATE:
$213,999
Value Range: $194,739 - $301,739

Compare:
This home
17516
Conestoga
Lancaster
PA
USA
Show sales
Zestimate Rankings
$186,718
$186,674
$169,051
$186,373
$261,421
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page378
76 of
of221
169
523
1 of 2
Page 13 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
2/24/2006 4:12 PM
05.17.2007
Trends
U.S.
District

i% n
j
k
l
m
j$ n
k
l
m
j % annualized
k
l
m
Past:
This home
17516
Conestoga
Lancaster
PA
US
30 days
0.7%
0.9%
1.3%
0.7%
-13%
0.6%
1 year
17%
15%
15%
12%
4.4%
21%
5 years
63%
57%
58%
52%
77%
90%
10 years
--
--
--
--
111%
104%
Last sale ()
--
--
--
--
--
--
Tax Information
2005
Property tax:
$2,519
$96,400
$55,200
$151,600
Sale History
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page379
77 of
of221
169
523
2 of 2
Page 14 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
2/24/2006 4:12 PM
05.17.2007
1 of 4

ZESTIMATE: $220,866
View large map

Home Facts
Public Facts
Owner's Facts
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page380
78 of
of221
169
523
Page 15 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
9/21/2006 11:58 AM
2 of 4
Home Facts
Owner Facts
Residence:
Single family
Bedrooms:
Bathrooms:
2.0
Sq ft:
1,060
Lot size:
82,764 sq ft / 1.90 acres
Year built:
1995
Year updated:
--
# Stories:
Total rooms:
Basement:
Finished
Roof type:
Asphalt
--
View:
--
Garage - Attached
--
--
Heat pump
Central
--
Fireplace:
Yes
Swimming pool:
--
Waterfront:
--
County:
Lancaster
Parcel #: 1203252300000
Zillow Home ID:
9692127
Are you the owner?

Learn More
Learn More
Zestimate: $220,866
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page381
79 of
of221
169
523
Page 16 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
9/21/2006 11:58 AM

States,
Page
1 ofet.al.,
2

Comparable
recent sales
Sold
Price
Date Sold
BR BA Home Lot
Home
ft
Lot
$/sq
ft
Year
Built
Dist
(mi)
220 Stone
Hill Rd
--
--
1,060
82,764 $196
$3
1995
--
213 Stone Hill

Rd
$208,000 05/15/2006 3
1,096
82,764 $190
$3
1998
0.08
561 Stone Hill

Rd
$260,000 01/24/2006 3
1.5 1,304
82,764 $199
$3
1997
0.43
101 W Elm St
$210,000 06/01/2006 3
1.5 1,516
19,602 $139
$11
1974
0.48
15 Orchard Ln
$163,000 04/10/2006 4
1.5 1,028
16,552 $159
$10
1985
0.41
5 Orchard Ln
$162,500 07/06/2005 3
1.5 994
16,552 $163
$10
1984
0.33
3455 Main St
$182,900 10/04/2005 4
1,456
16,988 $126
$11
1930
0.35
410 Kendig Rd
$175,000 01/05/2006 3
1,272
30,927 $138
$6
1963
0.67
2834 Main St
$129,000 11/30/2005 3
1,105
21,780 $117
$6
1942
0.56
24 E Elm St
$143,000 07/22/2005 3
1,344
17,424 $106
$8
1946
0.65
70 River
Corner Rd
$159,900 10/12/2005 4
1,841
8,276
$19
1890
0.45
Averages
$179,330 --
1.5 1,296
$9
--
--
$87
31,363 $142
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page382
80 of
of221
169
523
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
7/10/2006
Page 17 of 39
05.17.2007
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page383
81 of
of221
169
523
Page 18 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page384
82 of
of221
169
523
Page 19 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page385
83 of
of221
169
523
Page 20 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page386
84 of
of221
169
523
Page 21 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page387
85 of
of221
169
523
Page 22 of 39
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page388
86 of
of221
169
523
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,

STATEMENT
Statement Date
November 29, 2016
Customer ID: 0001
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
S.N. Lombardo Development Company
c/o Benecon Insurance Company
3175 Oregon Pike
Leola, PA 17540
626 Charlotte Street Development Proposal
Date
Date Due
Reference
Description
Amount
Balance
02/01/2009
02/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
$ 2,335.92
03/01/2009
03/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
21.35
$ 2,357.27
04/01/2009
04/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
21.35
$ 2,378.62
05/01/2009
05/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
21.35
$ 2,399.97
06/01/2009
06/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
21.35
$ 2,421.32
07/01/2009
07/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
21.35
$ 2,442.67
08/01/2009
08/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
21.35
$ 2,464.02
09/01/2009
09/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
21.35
$ 2,485.37
10/01/2009
10/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
21.35
$ 2,506.72
11/01/2009
11/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
21.35
$ 2,528.07
12/01/2009
12/01/2009
FC
Finance Charge
21.35
$ 2,549.42
01/01/2010
01/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
21.35
$ 2,570.77
02/01/2010
02/01/2010
FC
Finance Charge
21.35
$ 2,592.12
FC
Finance Charge
$1,064.78
11/29/2016
TOTAL DUE:
21.35
$ 3,656.90
$ 3,656.90
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page
Page389
87
11of
of221
169
523
23
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
Invoice

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
USA
Invoice Number:
7001
Invoice Date:
Mar 12, 2007
Voice:
Fax:
Page:
717-799-5915
717-427-1621
1
Duplicate
Ship To
Sold To:
S.N. Lombardo Development
c/o Ralph Mazzochi
33 Rider Avenue
Lancaster, PA 17603
______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
Customer ID
Customer PO
Payment Terms
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0001
C.O.D.
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Rep
Shipping Method
Ship Date
Due Date
|
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
| 3/12/07
USPS Priorty
______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
______________________________________________________________________________________________
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
| Extension
|
Quantity |
Item
Description
Unit Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.00 |Hours
75.00 |
2,250.00 |
|
| Management Consulting Hours
|
|
|
| for Restuarant Development
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary for James Street
|
|
|
|
|
| District Zoning Meeting on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March
13,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
-149.00 |
|
|
| Credit for fees paid in
|
|
|
|
| advanced including $100.00 in
|
|
|
|
|
| cash on March 9, 2007 and
|
|
|
|
|
| $49.00 in equipment with the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| purchase of a thumb drive on
|
|
|
|
|
| March 10,2007
|
|
|
|
|
| Fee includes all proofing and
|
|
|
|
|
| edits that were omitted from
|
|
|
|
|
| final print on March 12 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| at Office Max. The file
|
|
|
|
|
| Charollote Street Proposal
|
|
|
|
|
| March..amended.pdf
|
|
|
|
|
| that was given to Ralph
|
|
|
|
|
| Mazzocchi on March 11, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for
final
print
was
not
the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| file that the final print was
|
|
|
|
|
| taken from.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
Check No:
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page390
88 of
of221
169
523
Page 3 of 39
Subtotal
Sales Tax
Payment Received
Continued
Continued
Continued
TOTAL
Continued
Continued
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
Invoice

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
USA
Invoice Number:
7001
Invoice Date:
Mar 12, 2007
Voice:
Fax:
Page:
717-799-5915
717-427-1621
2
Duplicate
Ship To
Sold To:
S.N. Lombardo Development
c/o Ralph Mazzochi
33 Rider Avenue
Lancaster, PA 17603
______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
Customer ID
Customer PO
Payment Terms
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0001
C.O.D.
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Rep
Shipping Method
Ship Date
Due Date
|
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
| 3/12/07
USPS Priorty
______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
______________________________________________________________________________________________
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
| Extension
|
Quantity |
Item
Description
Unit Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
-230.00 |
|
|
| March 24, 2007 Raplph Mazzochi
|
|
|
|
| Payment from Copy Max, did not
|
|
|
|
|
| return proposals - Total Paid
|
|
|
|
|
| To Date $379.00.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|______________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
Check No:
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page391
89 of
of221
169
523
Page 4 of 39
Subtotal
Sales Tax
Payment Received
1,871.00
TOTAL
$1,871.00
1,871.00
0.00
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
05.17.2007
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page392
90 of
of221
169
523
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,

STATEMENT
Statement Date
November 29, 2016
Customer ID: 0009
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
Pfumm Contractors, Inc.,
58 South Duke Street
Millersville, PA 17551
Town and Country Lease of February 31, 1998
Date
Date Due
Reference
Description
Amount
Balance
Outstanding Payments
for Town & Country Lease
Executed on February 31, 1998
For 1994 Ford Explorer as
Per Agreement. See Attached
Exhibits.
$ 14,000.00
$ 14,000.00
05/1/2009
05/1/2009
Invoice
06/1/2009
06/1/2009
Finance Charge
116.67
$ 14,116.67
07/1/2009
07/1/2009
Finance Charge
116.67
$ 14,233.34
08/1/2009
08/1/2009
Finance Charge
116.67
$ 14,350.01
09/1/2009
09/1/2009
Finance Charge
116.67
$ 14,466.68
10/1/2009
10/1/2009
Finance Charge
116.67
$ 14,466.68
11/1/2009
11/1/2009
Finance Charge
116.67
$ 14,700.02
12/1/2009
12/1/2009
Finance Charge
116.67
$ 14,816.69
01/1/2010
01/1/2010
Finance Charge
116.67
$ 14,933.36
02/1/2010
02/1/2010
Finance Charge
116.67
$ 15,050.03
11/29/2016
FC
Finance Charge
TOTAL DUE:
$6,182.20
$ 21,232.23
$ 21,232.23
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page
Page393
91
12of
of221
169
523
23
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
Diary of Mental Duress

Pflumm Contractors, Inc.,
I started to log incidents of mental duress in December of 1997 after the incidents became
consistent and demonstrated not be random acts of mere occurrences. This behavior and
malicious treatment was an extreme divergence from the previous 45 months of my
tenure and a polarization of my relationships with all employees involved, including Mr.
David Pflumm.
Ms. Susan Bare (Office Manager, Reporting Directly To Me)
In December, her attitude became especially hostile toward me, upon many occasions
challenging my computer knowledge when in fact she has limited experience. She had
continued to persist in wanting to change procedures, which I had repeatedly told her that
systems are reviewed at the end of the fiscal year, and any necessary changes would only
be made during the off-season, as in previous years. She had continued to challenge my
authority, which was out-of -character, and not consistent with her job description. She
had often become upset and snippy when I would not go out and get her lunch, which
was not in my job description.
Mr. James Leonards, (Asphalt Paving Supervisor)
In the week preceding Christmas vacation, Mr. Leonards had requested that I submit a
form to Wholsen Contractors, which was incidental to any contracts. The form requested
banking accounts, which I had refused to answer. I would not release the corporate
confidential banking information to a General Contractor of whom we were at credit risk
for collecting payments for services rendered, not the other way around. Mr. Leonards
continued to harass me about the document, and kept waiving the document in front of
my face. He continued, and I told him to have Wholsen call me. I had counted five
incidents regarding this document, which I never submitted. This information was
immaterial to any negotiations with Wholsen, and was intended only as a means of
mental duress.
Mr. Leonards had shown interest in learning estimating software on the computer. He
persistently requested the opportunity, and I had suggested that he evaluate competing
software before any final decisions were made. He had on his own, obtained a
demonstration of software, which he evaluated. It was not what we required, and before
Christmas, I had procured another demonstration disc for his evaluation. He promised to
evaluate that software over the Christmas vacation. Mr. Leonards kept giving me
excuses, and was never evaluated., merely to inflict mental duress.
On many occasions Mr. Leonards insisted on challenging my computer knowledge with
incidental technical questions, knowing that I was becoming annoyed. Mr. Leonards
only began working on a computer at home, within the past several months.
On January 15th, I went out to start my car, and Mr. Leonards and Mr. Ralph Carruthers
from the lobby door, made gestures at me thinking that I was leaving, when in fact I was
1
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page394
92 of
of221
169
523
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
merely warming up my car. When I returned to the lobby, Mr. Leonards and Mr.
Carruthers had disappeared.
On or about February 24th, upon logging into my AOL account, a Buddy List message
from Mr. James Leonards appeared on my computer screen that said Stan is that you?.
The only way that I am able to receive Buddy List messages is to sign up for the
service, of which I had never done, which means that Mr. Leonards must have illegally
accessed my account and signed my account up for the service. The evening before, a
neighbor saw me looking for my cats with a spot light, and yelled Stan is that you?.
This is certainly a clear example of mental duress, among other electronic privacy
violations.
Mr. John Brown, (Truck Driver)
On January 9th, Mr. John Brown was receiving his pay check and made the following
remark Stan, why didnt you go to Cancun with Dave, you look like one of those
Mexicans.
LN Dockey (Office Assistant, part-time)
Consistently called my car phone upon leaving the office to ask where I was going, and
when I was coming back, which was none of her business. She reported to me, I did not
report to her. She knew that this annoyed me, and was out-of-character and inconsistent
with prior behavior.
Mr. Brian Langsett (Subcontractor)
Mr. Brian Langsett continued to make calls to my home, and during the week of February
20th, screamed and yelled into my voice mail, which resulted in my changing my line to a
private phone line. Mr. Langsett consistently left messages on my voice mail, knowing
that I was not going to answer them back.
Mr. Ralph Carruthers (General Manager)
On January 22nd, Mr. Ralph Carruthers entered my office and requested that I redo a pay
application for the Lancaster Township Park Avenue project that I had done. I informed
him that I had nothing to do with that pay application because I was on vacation. He
stormed out of my office, mad that I wouldnt redo the pay application and telling me that
I had done it. Immediately following his departure, Mr. David Pflumm stormed into my
office and got inches away from my face and said Do you and Ralph have a problem,
what is your problem? I nervously and quite upset said, Dave, I didnt prepare that pay
application, I was on vacation. Mr. Pflumm replied, Yes you did. I immediately
said, Dave, mental duress is a serious matter, you dont mess with someones mind,
like that you just dont play with someones mind like this., I was on vacation Mr.
Pflumm went on to say that I did do the pay application. I asked him Do you have a
problem with me?. He replied no.
2
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page395
93 of
of221
169
523
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
I later went to the file and retrieved the original pay application for Lancaster Townships
Park Avenue. It was prepared by Mr. David Pflumm with his handwriting. I later
showed it to him and he said nothing. THIS IS MENTAL DURESS.
Mr. David Pflumm (President, Owner, Best Friend)

See Above.
In August of 1997, I was responsible for the formulation, presentation, and collection of a
Change Order for the removal of rock at the Cecil County Community College, which we
subcontracted the work from e.e. Murray Construction Company. We had negotiated a
unit price per cubic yard of rock removed, and we were required to document the
measurements which accounted for a billing of some $275,000 to e.e. Murray.
I had spent several hundred hours on the project, most of which I had done at my office at
home. Through November, it became apparent that the e.e. Murray was trying to pass on
their own problems and mistakes with their contract with the College to us, in an effort to
relieve themselves of the $275,000 contractual liability they had with Pflumm
Contractors, Inc., This process was an enormous burden, given the impact the loss would
have to our financial, and especially considering that e.e. Murray had no legal loophole to
avoid payment to us, irregardless of any dispute they had with the college. I had proven
this through thorough documentation and the specifics of our contractual arrangements.
My policy and the policy of Pflumm Contractors, Inc., up to this point had always been to
take legal action after all other efforts for collections and contract disputes have failed. I
had demonstrated an outstanding performance in reducing the amount of bad receivables,
which had almost caused the company into bankruptcy prior to my affiliation. More Mr.
David Pflumm had always demonstrated a hard line stance in all collection matters, even
to the extreme of causing the dismissal of his own employee for failing to reimburse the
company for a $700 repair bill. Mr. David Pflumm was not known for his fairness or
good faith negotiating. His tendency was to inflate production figures, and was lack in
leniency to anyone that owed him money. This was clearly demonstrated in past
contractual disputes with the Hershey Library, Dutch Family Inn, Consolicated
Construction, and various other small accounts. His policy was consistent no matter
what the amount of the payable. Mr. Pflumm was quick to take legal action in all
disputes as soon as negotiations proved fruitless.
As early as late October I had advised Mr. Pflumm that we were exhausting our efforts
for collection of the $275,000 and that e.e. Murray was not negotiating in good faith and
was in my opinion engaging in fraudulent tactics. This transaction was of even greater
importance than any other bad receivable due to the fact that a majority of the funds at
risk were pure profits. As early as November, it was the advise of our corporate attorney,
Mr. Matt Ssamley of Xakellis, Reeese and Pugh, that a civil law suit should be
immediately filed. I had Mr. Matt Samley detail all of the legal parameters of his legal
opinion supporting his contentions.
3
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page396
94 of
of221
169
523
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
In November, I had informed Mr. David Pflumm that I personally removed myself form
the dispute on the grounds that e.e. Murray Construction Company was not acting in
good faith, I had exhausted all available resources and means of collecting the monies
without a civil law suit being filed, and Mr. David Pflumm refused to take legal action.
By my departure on February 20th, all efforts for collecting the $275,000 proved fruitless,
and Mr. David Pflumm continued his procrastination of filing a civil lawsuit.
I am of the firm belief that the many of the negotiations and situations surrounding the
collection of payments from e.e. Murray was strategically used as ploy to inflict mental
duress for the following reasons:
1. I had exhausted most of my time during September, October, and November
while also managing my regular duties, and had requested a fee for the
collection of funds that was well beyond the scope of my duties.
2. e.e. Murray Construction Company had no legal foundation for not paying
Pflumm Contractors, Inc., irregardless of whether e.e. Murray collected the
funds from the Cecil County Community College.
3. e.e Murray had collected enough funds from Cecil County Community
College in January, and still refused any payment to Pflumm Contractors, Inc.,
4. Mr. David Pflumm had exhibited and demonstrated an extreme sense of
leniency toward filing a civil lawsuit that was unprecedented during my
tenure and in the history of the company.
5. Over half of the $275,000 was cash for the company.
6. I allege that during the month of February, communications were used to
deceive the true nature of the situation.
7. Mr. Pflumm had always taken my advice on such matters during my tenure.
8. Lastly, the only reasonable explanation for not filing a civil complaint is that
the situation was not being truly disclosed by Mr. David Pflumm and e.e.
Murray and that a lawsuit would become public record and have adverse and
irrevocable damages to e.e. Murray Construction Company.
In late January Mr. David Pflumm laid an large envelope addressed to his home on my
desk. Inside was a letter addressed to me from AirWays Charter Service, including a
brochure depicting a plane, identical to that which was illegally repossessed from me in
1987. This was clearly a demonstrated tactic for mental duress. In the history of my
tenure, we have never discussed or had any remote need for such a service, and more
importantly, the package was addressed to Mr. David Pflumms home.
On week of February 20th, Mr. David Pflumm had provided me with documentation that
required my signature from Town & Country Leasing for my automobile that that had I
signed would have given the leasing company the right to repossess the automobile at
any given time while providing me with no legal recourse to prevent such repossession.
Mr. Pflumm had agreed to personally guarantee the payments for the automobile for the
duration of the lease, under any and all circumstances. He has breached his agreement.
4
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page397
95 of
of221
169
523
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
During the weeks preceding my departure, in the course of my travels, I had passed many
employees on many different occasions during the course of the day. On every occasion,
not one employee would acknowledge me with a gesture or waive.
During my tenure at Pflumm Contractors, Inc., not only did I resurrect the company from
near bankruptcy, and restore the company to the best financial condition it has ever
experienced, even as important was the management policies that I had implemented that
had for the first time given the employees fair and equitable place of employment. And
their gratitude was often displayed and demonstrated toward me. The behavior of the
company, as a whole, was drastically out of character and malicious, which had resulted
in a hostile environment directly threatening my mental welfare. There is not a reason in
the world where I should have been so maliciously treated. The pain and suffering was
so great, that I specifically sought the advice and help of Fr. Edward Lavelle on January
14th, in the Office of the Bishiop.
Any further detail to this document would greatly compromise my rights for any future
litigation which may or may not transpire.
I Attest,
5
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page398
96 of
of221
169
523
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page399
97 of
of221
169
523
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page400
98 of
of221
169
523
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
Page401
99 of
of221
169
523
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,

Letter to Matt Samley of Xakellis Reese & Pugh re ISC Opinion and Invoice
Stan J. Caterbone
220 Stone Hill Road
Conestoga, PA 17516
April 7, 1998
Mr. Matt Samley
Xakellis, Reese & Pugh
129 East Orange Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Re: Outstanding Invoice
Dear Mr. Samley:
I refute payment of the above mentioned invoice for the following reasons:
1. Reasonable Time As Promised. On or about November 24, 1997, we had a
telephone conversation while at my office of Pflumm Contractors, Inc., when
you had offered to update your progress on my request for a legal opinion
relating to the matters described herein. You had indicated that you were
busy, and that I would have a letter soon. I had stated that I was in no
immediate need, as long as it was within a reasonable amount of time. You
had promised me that it would be forthcoming immediately following the
Christmas Holidays. And I agreed with that time schedule.
I received the document on February 28, 1998, some 50 or so days after your
promised time schedule, and by your own accounting of my billing hours, it
took you approximately 60 days to complete the last 40 minutes of your
efforts.
This certainly does not constitute reasonable, as you had promised, and raises
questions as to your good faith efforts regarding my issues. Furthermore, I had
never had any conversations with you pertaining to these matters since that
conversation on or about November 24th, which you had an ethical obligation
to notify me if you were not able to deliver your opinion as promised.
2. Conflict of Interest. Immediately following my departure of Pflumm

Contractors, Inc., on February 20th, 1998 and my sworn statement to the PA
Unemployment Compensation Review Board, given the fact that you
represent David Pflumm and Pflumm Contractors, Inc., constitutes a conflict
of interest by most if not all of your Professional Code of Ethics . The fact
that you have conveniently delivered your legal opinion immediately
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page 402
100 of 523
169
221
Page 1 of 2
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
April 7, 1998

Letter to Matt Samley of Xakellis Reese & Pugh re ISC Opinion and Invoice
following my departure of February 20th, certainly raises some questions as

to the timing of your legal opinion, which is dated February 26th.
3. The Legal Opinion. The following paragraph will serve my purpose,

Regarding the arrest and subsequent prison term, that should have been dealt
with through the appellate process and Post-Conviction Relief Act process and
frankly I do not see anything here at this time that could be done regarding and
arrest ten years ago and that time was served. To expunge a record now would
probably be beyond the statute of limitations for doing so. Finally, even it it
were possible, the fact that this presumably went to a jury and the jury found you
guilty seemed to indicate that at least based on the evidence provided, the jury
had some belief to find you guilty of what you were bound over for trial for.
Where on Gods earth did you find any information to insinuate that I was ever
convicted of any crime. Thank you, you have just proven my point. That
preceding statement, given the wealth of information that you have in your
possession, substantiates the fundamental foundation of the legal issues that I am
questioning, which undermines the framework of my civil, constitutional, and
shareholder rights.
I request that you immediately return all of my documents, and attest that no
copies of both paper and or audio have been retained by you or by Xakellis,
Reese & Pugh.
I remain,
Stan J. Caterbone
cc: Samleyfile
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page 403
101 of 523
169
221
Page 2 of 2
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
April 7, 1998
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page 404
102 of 523
169
221
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,

STATEMENT
Statement Date
November 29, 2016
Customer ID: 0010
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Date
Account of:
New Holland Dental
650 East Main Street
New Holland, PA 17557
Date Due
Reference
Description
Amount
Balance
05/1/2009
05/1/2009
Outstanding Invoice
$ 2,600.00
2,618.00
Invoice
Invoice Discrimination and Harassment during Free Dental Day of May 1, 2009 Patient traveled to facility at
Approx. 6:00 for free dental Services to get at least a Cavity filled after seeing it on WGAL-T\/8 News at
5:30 am. At approximately 11:00 am patient received a Panoramic X-Ray and approximately 10 minutes
later the patient received a free dental Examination in the examination room closest to Main Street, New
Holland by a Dentist who identified himself as being from Reading. The dentist examined the patient's
mouth and described a large cavity (from a prior filling falling out) that needed a crown or filling. Patient
explained that he wanted a filling and would opt for a crown at a later time. Dentist agreed and wrote the
prognosis and treatment for a filling on patient's chart. Patient was told to wait for his turn. The Dental
Staff broke for lunch, and patient immediately inquired about the number. Staff had told the yet to be
treated patients that approximately 70 to 80 people were already treated. Patient had number 366, which
meant that 65 persons were to be treated before him. The Staff told patient that he would be one of first
after lunch. It was now approximately 2:15 when 3 females approached the patient in the waiting room
and tried to explain that there was an infection in the area to be treated, however the examining dentist
made no mention of any infection or abscess. The patient did not know if the girls were authorized, or even
if they were part of the dental staff. The patient demanded his X-Ray and walked out of the facility. The
woman and 2 females that identified themselves as coming from the Mt. Joy Career Technical Institute,
namely the darker student and the teacher were harassing all day.
8 Hours of Consulting Time

$600.00
At $75.00 Per Hour for Time
Wasted on Promised Dental Care.
8- Gallons Gasoline
$ 16.00
2- Hot Dogs
$ 2.00
Harassment; Pain and Suffering $2,000.00
06/1/2009
06/1/2009
Finance Charge
21.82
$ 2,639.82
07/1/2009
07/1/2009
Finance Charge
21.82
$ 2,661.64
08/1/2009
08/1/2009
Finance Charge
21.82
$ 2,683.46
09/1/2009
09/1/2009
Finance Charge
21.82
$ 2,705.28
10/1/2009
10/1/2009
Finance Charge
21.82
$ 2,727.10
11/1/2009
11/1/2009
Finance Charge
21.82
$ 2,748.92
12/1/2009
12/1/2009
Finance Charge
21.82
$ 2,770.74
01/1/2010
01/1/2010
Finance Charge
21.82
$ 2,792.56
02/1/2010
02/1/2010
Finance Charge
21.82
$ 2,814.38
11/29/2016
FC
Finance Charge
$1,156.08
TOTAL DUE:
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 405
103
13 of 523
169
221
23
79
$ 3,970.46
$ 3,970.46
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,

STATEMENT
Statement Date
November 29, 2016
Customer ID: 0011
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
Social Security Administration
Suite 104
1809 Olde Homestead Lane
Lancaster, PA 17601-5957
Date
Date Due
05/1/2009
05/1/2009
Reference
Invoice
Description
Amount
Disability/SSI Payments From

December 1, 2005 to May 1, 2009
42 Months at $835.00 per month $ 35,070.00
Balance
$ 35,070.00
06/1/2009
06/1/2009
Finance Charge
Monthly Disability
$
$
292.25
835.00
$ 35,362.25
$36,197.25
07/1/2009
07/1/2009
Finance Charge
Monthly Disability
$
$
292.25
835.00
$ 36,489.50
$37,324.50
08/1/2009
08/1/2009
Finance Charge
Monthly Disability
$
$
292.25
835.00
$ 37,616.75
$38,451.75
08/20/2009
08/20/2009
Payment
$21,460.00
$16,991.75
09/1/2009
09/1/2009
Finance Charge
0.00
$ 16,991.75
10/1/2009
10/1/2009
Finance Charge
141.60
$ 17,133.35
11/1/2009
11/1/2009
Finance Charge
141.60
$ 17,274.95
12/1/2009
12/1/2009
Finance Charge
141.60
$ 17,416.55
01/1/2010
01/1/2010
Finance Charge
141.60
$ 17,558.15
02/1/2010
02/1/2010
Finance Charge
141.60
$ 17,669.75
$7,258.32
$ 24,928.07
11/29/2016
FC
Finance Charge
TOTAL DUE:
$ 24,928.07
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 406
104
14 of 523
169
221
23
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,

STATEMENT
Statement Date
November 29, 2016
Customer ID: 0012
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation
7th Floor, Labor & Industry Building
651 Boas Street
Date
Date Due
05/1/2009
05/1/2009
Reference
Description
Amount
Balance
Invoice
18 months of Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation

Benefits from July 1, 1987 to December 1, 1988
At $400.00 Per Week
$21,600.00
Interest 10% Per Annually
$43,200.00
Invoice
18 months of Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation

Benefits from March 1, 1998 to August 1, 1999
At $400.00 Per Week
$36,000.00
Interest 10% Per Annually
$28,800.00
TOTAL
$129,600.00
06/1/2009
06/1/2009
Finance Charge
1,080.00
$130,680.00
07/1/2009
07/1/2009
Finance Charge
1,080.00
$131,760.00
08/1/2009
08/1/2009
Finance Charge
1,080.00
$132,840.00
09/1/2009
09/1/2009
Finance Charge
1,080.00
$133,920.00
10/1/2009
10/1/2009
Finance Charge
1,080.00
$135,000.00
11/1/2009
11/1/2009
Finance Charge
1,080.00
$136,080.00
12/1/2009
12/1/2009
Finance Charge
1,080.00
$137,160.00
01/1/2010
01/1/2010
Finance Charge
1,080.00
$138,240.00
02/1/2010
02/1/2010
Finance Charge
1,080.00
$139,320.00
11/29/2016
FC
Finance Charge
TOTAL DUE:
$ 57,229.40
$ 196,549.40
$ 196,549.40
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 407
105
15 of 523
169
221
23
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,

STATEMENT
Statement Date
November 29, 2016
Customer ID: 0014
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
Southern Regional Police Department
3284 Main Street
Conestoga, PA 17516
Date
Date Due
05/1/2009
05/1/2009
Reference
Invoice
Description
Amount
Balance
Stolen Cash of April 5, 2006 during

302 Incident
$ 743.00
Window Repair of April 5, 2006 during
302 Incident
$ 315.00
Towing & Storage of April 5, 2006 during
302 Incident
$ 280.00
Subtotal
$ 1,388.40
Interest to June 1, 2009
$ 443.00
$ 1,781.40
06/1/2009
06/1/2009
Finance Charge
0.00
$ 1,781.40
07/1/2009
07/1/2009
Finance Charge
14.85
$ 1,796.25
08/1/2009
08/1/2009
Finance Charge
14.85
$ 1,811.10
09/1/2009
09/1/2009
Finance Charge
14.85
$ 1,825.95
10/1/2009
10/1/2009
Finance Charge
14.85
$ 1,840.80
11/1/2009
11/1/2009
Finance Charge
14.85
$ 1,855.65
12/1/2009
12/1/2009
Finance Charge
14.85
$ 1,870.50
01/1/2010
01/1/2010
Finance Charge
14.85
$ 1,885.36
02/1/2010
02/1/2010
Finance Charge
14.85
$ 1,900.21
11/29/2016
FC
Finance Charge
TOTAL DUE:
$ 780.56
$ 2,680.77
$ 2,680.77
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 408
106
16 of 523
169
221
23
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,

STATEMENT
Statement Date
November 29, 2016
Customer ID: 0015
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
Lancaster Employment Training Agency LETA
1016 North Charlotte Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Date
Date Due
06/1/2009
05/1/2009
Reference
Invoice
Description
Amount
Invoice Individual Training Account (ITA)

Provider Service Title:
Paralegal Studies
$14,000.00
See Attached Exhibits
Balance
$ 14,000.00
07/1/2009
07/1/2009
Finance Charge
$ 116.67
$ 14,116.67
08/1/2009
08/1/2009
Finance Charge
$ 116.67
$ 14,233.34
09/1/2009
09/1/2009
Finance Charge
$ 116.67
$ 14,350.01
10/1/2009
10/1/2009
Finance Charge
$ 116.67
$ 14,466.69
11/1/2009
11/1/2009
Finance Charge
$ 116.67
$ 14,583.35
12/1/2009
12/1/2009
Finance Charge
$ 116.67
$ 14,700.02
01/1/2010
01/1/2010
Finance Charge
$ 116.67
$ 14,816.69
02/1/2010
02/1/2010
Finance Charge
$ 116.67
$ 14,933.36
11/29/2016
FC
Finance Charge
TOTAL DUE:
$6,134.28
$ 21,067.64
$ 21,067.64
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 409
107
17 of 523
169
221
23
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,

STATEMENT
Statement Date
November 29, 2016
Customer ID: 0016
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
State Farm Insurance
100 State Farm Place
Ballstron Spa, NY 12020-8000
Re: Insurance Policy Claim No. 38-P876-509

Pennsylvania Department of Insurance No. 09-169-68443
Date
Date Due
06/1/2009
06/1/2009
Reference
Invoice
Description
Amount
Balance
Self Insurance Fund

33% of $35,000.00 Contents Coverage
Failure to Honor Claims Per
Contract Pursuant to State and
Federal Laws $ 11,666.67
$11,666.67
$11,666.67
7/1/2009
07/1/2009
Finance Charge
97.23
$11,763.90
8/1/2009
08/1/2009
Finance Charge
97.23
$11,861.13
9/1/2009
09/1/2009
Finance Charge
97.23
$11,958.36
10/1/2009
10/1/2009
Finance Charge
97.23
12,055.59
11/1/2009
11/1/2009
Finance Charge
97.23
12,152.82
01/1/2010
01/1/2010
Finance Charge
97.23
12,347.28
02/1/2010
02/1/2010
Finance Charge
97.23
12,444.51
11/29/2016
FC
Finance Charge
$5,111.91
TOTAL DUE:
$ 17,556.42
$ 17,556.42
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 410
108
18 of 523
169
221
23
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,

STATEMENT
Statement Date
November 29, 2016
Customer ID: 0017
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
The Lancaster Bureau of Police
39 West Chestnut Street
Lancaster, PA 17603-3510
Re: State Department of Insurance File No. 09-169-68443

State Farm Insurance Policy Claim No. 38-P876-509
Date
Date Due
06/1/2009
06/1/2009
Reference
Description
Invoice
Amount
Self Insurance Fund

$11,666.67
Balance
$11,666.67
7/1/2009
07/1/2009
Finance Charge
97.64
$11,814.31
8/1/2009
08/1/2009
Finance Charge
97.64
$11,911.95
9/1/2009
09/1/2009
Finance Charge
97.64
$12,009.59
10/1/2009
10/1/2009
Finance Charge
97.64
$12,107.23
11/1/2009
11/1/2009
Finance Charge
97.64
$12,204.87
12/1/2009
12/1/2009
Finance Charge
97.64
$12,302.51
01/1/2010
01/1/2010
Finance Charge
97.64
$12,400.15
02/1/2010
02/1/2010
Finance Charge
97.64
$12,497.79
07/08/2015
11/29/2016
Forced Entry to 1250 Fremont Street

To SERVE 302 Psychiatric Warrant
Replace Broken Door and Charge To Change
Locks
FC
Finance Charge
TOTAL DUE:
$5,133.80
$ 800.00
$ 18,431.59
$ 18,431.59
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 411
109
19 of 523
169
221
23
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,

STATEMENT
Statement Date
November 29, 2016
Customer ID: 0018
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
Pennsylvania Department of Insurance
Bureau of Consumer Services
1209 Strawberry Square
Re: State Department of Insurance File No. 09-169-68443

State Farm Insurance Policy Claim No. 38-P876-509
Date
Date Due
06/1/2009
06/1/2009
Reference
Invoice
Description
Amount
Self Insurance Fund

$11,666.67
Balance
$11,666.67
7/1/2009
07/1/2009
Finance Charge
97.23
$11,763.90
8/1/2009
08/1/2009
Finance Charge
97.23
$11,861.13
9/1/2009
09/1/2009
Finance Charge
97.23
$11,958.36
10/1/2009
10/1/2009
Finance Charge
97.23
$12,055.59
11/1/2009
11/1/2009
Finance Charge
97.23
$12,152.82
12/1/2009
12/1/2009
Finance Charge
97.23
$12,250.05
01/1/2010
01/1/2010
Finance Charge
97.23
12,347.28
02/1/2010
02/1/2010
Finance Charge
97.23
12,444.51
11/29/2016
FC
Finance Charge
TOTAL DUE:
$5,111.91
$ 17,556.42
$ 17,556.42
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 412
110
20 of 523
169
221
23
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,

STATEMENT
Statement Date
November 29, 2016
Customer ID: 0013
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
Lancaster County Assistance Office LCAO

Pennsylvania Department of Welfare
832 Manor Avenue
Lancaster, PA 17603
Date
Date Due
05/1/2009
05/1/2009
Reference
Invoice
Description
Amount
Balance
Food Stamp Benefits with a Free $ 5,920.00

Red Rose Transit Authority Bus Pass
October 1, 2006 to May 1, 2008
32 Months at $185.00 per Month
Legal Costs 4 Appeals
at $2,500 Each
$10,000.00
$15,920.00
06/1/2009
06/1/2009
Finance Charge
132.67
$ 16,052.67
07/1/2009
07/1/2009
Finance Charge
132.67
$ 16,185.34
08/1/2009
08/1/2009
Finance Charge
132.67
$ 16,318.01
09/1/2009
09/1/2009
Finance Charge
132.67
$ 16,450.68
10/1/2009
10/1/2009
Finance Charge
132.67
$ 16,583.35
11/1/2009
11/1/2009
Finance Charge
132.67
$ 16,716.02
12/1/2009
12/1/2009
Finance Charge
132.67
$ 16,848.69
01/1/2010
01/1/2010
Finance Charge
132.67
$ 16,981.36
02/1/2010
02/1/2010
Finance Charge
132.67
$ 17,114.03
11/29/2016
FC
Finance Charge
TOTAL DUE:
$7,030.04
$ 24,144.07
$ 24,144.07
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 413
111
21 of 523
169
221
23
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,

STATEMENT
Statement Date
November 29, 2016
Customer ID: 0020
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
State Auto Insurance Company
Eastern Regional Office

PO Box 2006
Mechanicsburg PA 17055-0733
(717)697-1121
Claim Number: CATE-0285037-090409
Loss Date: 09/04/2009
Insured: STANLEY CATERBONE
Date
Date Due
12/1/2009
12/1/2009
01/1/2010
01/1/2010
Finance Charge
02/1/2010
02/1/2010
Finance Charge
11/29/2016
Reference
Invoice
FC
Description
Amount
Parts and Labor for Rear

Bumper
Finance Charge
$700.00
$ 5.83
$ 705.83
$ 755.83
5.83
$ 310.48
Total
Balance
$1,066.31
$1,066.31
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 414
112
22 of 523
169
221
23
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,

STATEMENT
Statement Date
November 29, 2016
Customer ID: 0021
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Account of:
United States Department of Defense
Ash Carter
Secretary of Defense
1000 Defense Pentagon
Washington, DC 20301-1000
Date
Date Due
Reference
Description
Amount
01/1/2010
01/1/2010
23 Years of Service of unwitting experimentation

under U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
for the development and deployment
of U.S. Military weapons and systems
$100,000.00 per Year1
Balance
$2,300,000.00
See attached:
Federal Whistleblower and Targeted Individual of U.S Sponsored Mind Control
Executive Summary, September 13, 2009 With Ground Zero
See Supporting Documentation by Visiting:
Memo to Secretary Robert Gates of April 7, 2009
2. http://www.scribd.com/doc/24371616/Submission-to-U-S-Department-of-Defense-Website-Re-U-SSecretary-of-Defense-Robert-Gates-April-7-2009
3. ISC & Pakistan Missle Project Called Khyber-Pass
4. http://www.scribd.com/doc/24366542/ISC-and-the-Pakistan-Missle-Deals-of-1986-Called-The-Khyber-PassProject
5. CIA Torture Investigations EIT Program & SERE and U.S. Sponsored Mind Control by Stan J. Caterbone, October 2,
2009 Used as Exhibit in Human Rights Complaint to U.N. Council for Human Rights
6. http://www.scribd.com/doc/23900626/CIA-Torture-Investigations-EIT-Program-SERE-and-U-S-SponsoredMind-Control-by-Stan-Caterbone-October-2-2009
1.
02/1/2010
11/29/2016
02/1/2010
Finance Charge
FC
19,166.66
Finance Charge
$2,300,019.66
$ 944,794.36
$3,244,814.02
TOTAL $3,244,814.02
1 Fee for service does not include interest, penalties, or any damages to health and welfare of Stanley J. Caterbone.
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 415
113
23 of 523
169
221
23
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 416
114
24 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 417
115
25 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 418
116
26 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 419
117
27 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 420
118
28 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 421
119
29 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 422
120
30 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
June 7, 2015
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Social Security Administration

P.O. Box 4550
Wilkes Barre, PA 18767-4550
Claim No. XXX-XX-0959 A-
Re: Disability Update Report of June 5, 2015

To Whom It May Concern:
Attached are supporting documents for the above. The following is a list of the
attached items for your considerations and review:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Fairmont Behaviorial Systems/Hospital Medical and 302 Report

Lancaster General Hospital Illegal No Trespass Notice
Targeted Individual Summary and Notarized Affidavit
Accumulated Illegal No Trespass Notices
24 Criminal Charges Dismissed 1987 to 2007
Thank you for your considerations.
cc: file
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 423
121
31 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 424
122
32 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 425
123
33 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 426
124
34 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 427
125
35 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 428
126
36 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 429
127
37 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 430
128
38 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 431
129
39 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 432
130
40 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 433
131
41 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 434
132
42 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 435
133
43 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 436
134
44 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, LTD.,

&
STAN J. CATERBONE
Federal Whistleblower (Federal False Claims Act Violation in 1987 re ISC)
Targeted Individual of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
and Directed Energy Devices or Weapons With Organized Stalking
See Attached Affidavit of September 16, 2010
I have been a Targeted Individual, TI, and Victim since 1987. In 1987 I blew the whistle on
an international defense contractor, International Signal & Control, ISC, who was selling arms to
Iraq via South Africa and was convicted of a $1 Billion dollar Fraud. They were founded and
headquartered in my hometown of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. I was a shareholder and was solicited
to help finance some of their operations.
ISC was a Department of Defense (DOD) Contractor
and a partner with United States Intelligence Agencies since it's beginnings in the early 1970's.
One of it's first contracts was Project X with the National Security Agency or NSA of Ft. Meade,
Maryland.
My father was part of U.S. Navy experiments in the 1940's and experienced synthetic
telepathy in the 1970's and 1980's. My brother was in the U.S. Air Force and a victim of the LSD
experiments in the late 1960's.
Organized stalking and harassment began in 1987 following the public allegations of fraud
within ISC. As far back as the late 1980's I knew that my mind was being read, or "remotely
viewed".
In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind control turned into an all-out assault of mental
telepathy; synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy devices
and electromagnetic weapons. This assault was no coincidence in that it began simultaneously
with the filing of the federal action in U.S. District Court, of CATERBONE v. Lancaster County
Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288.
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 437
135
45 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
Freedom from Covert Harassment and Surveillance (FFCHS)

Post Office Box 9022
Cincinnati, Ohio 45209
October 10, 2010
Glenn A. Fine, Inspector General
Office of the Inspector General
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Room 4706
Washington, D.C. 20530
Subject: A Demand for an Investigation of the FBI
Dear Mr. Fine:
Freedom from Covert Harassment and Surveillance (FFCHS) represents nearly one-thousand U. S.
citizens and residents, all of whom are victims of organized stalking, electronic stalking, or mind
manipulation carried out remotely by unseen assailants using unseen weapons. FFCHS is only one
of several organizations composed of those targeted individuals (TIs). Attached to this demand
letter are also affidavits of victims concerning their torture.
Most of the victims have recurred to the FBI and other law enforcement entities, sometimes
repeatedly, to file complaints concerning their assault; yet, the FBI has consistently refused to
properly investigate the victims claims. Refusal to look into those crimes makes the FBI guilty of
misconduct and dereliction of duty by not providing protection to American citizens on American
soil. Moreover, it makes the FBI accomplices of the assailants. The FBIs unwillingness to intervene
dangerously undermines the American citizenrys faith in the national government.
TIs suffer relentless attacks by high-tech directed energy weaponry that the U. S. military, the U.
S. intelligence community, and law enforcement are known to possess. Some of those targets
daily endure involuntary neurological intervention that includes synthetic telepathy and mind
reading. Many TIs believe that elements of the executive branch either commit those assaults or
aid and protect those who do so. Victims of those attacks experience mentally and physically
debilitating effects. Some of those effects follow.
-- Continual voice-to-skull (V2K) hearing and auditory torture with intense, loud,
electronic-sounding noise.
-- Visual distortions and blurred vision.
-- Manipulation of will, emotions, feelings, and perceptions.
-- Forced speech, involuntary body movements.
-- Mind reading, mining of memories, and neurological interrogations.
-- Induced multiple personalities, transmission of specific commands into the subconscious, and
compulsory execution of these commands.
-- Debilitation of mental acuity: inability to concentrate and disruption of ability to think rationally
and independently.
-- Loss of memory and knowledge.
-- Imposition of altered states that targeted individuals have never experienced before such as
narcotic intoxication and obsessive desires.
-- Manipulation of sleep patterns: sleep deprivation or uncontrollable sleep.
-- Cramps, seizures, and muscle spasms.
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 438
136
46 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
--Excruciating artificial pain in any part of the body.

-- Induced heart attacks, cancer, and other serious medical conditions.
Those electronic and neurological attacks are often accompanied by on-site organized stalking,
wiretapping, phone tampering, computer tampering, mail tampering, vehicle tampering,
workplace mobbing, vandalism, illegal entries, and break-ins.
The failure of the FBI, along with federal, state and local law enforcement, to protect victims of
electronic and neurological assault results in the following violations of those victims basic civil
and human rights.
Denial of victims of equal protection under the laws and the right of due processunder Section 1 of
the Fourteenth Amendment, also known as the Incorporation Doctrine. The Supreme Court has
found that each of these incorporated rights is "deeply rooted in the nation's history" and
"fundamental" to the concept of "ordered liberty" represented by the due process clause [Palko v.
Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319, 58 S. Ct. 149, 82 L. Ed. 288 [1937]. Subjection of victims to cruel and
unusual punishment and the tortuous invasion of privacy by the endless snooping" [See Galella v.
Onassis, 353 F. Supp. 196, 227-28, Page 2 (S.D.N.Y. 1972]. And subjection to organized stalking
and stealth technologies utilized to conduct myriad intrusions upon our person [See United States
of America v. Lawrence Maynard, (08-3030), p. 32 (U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C., August 6, 2010)
where the court found that U. S. Governments prolonged GPS tracking of Jones indeed violates
the intrusions every police practice the Supreme Court has deemed a search under
Katz].Deprivation of victims right to privacy, as well as the privacy of thought, as interpreted by
the U.S. Supreme Court through our Bill of Rights, the 1st Amendment (Privacy of Beliefs), 3rd
Amendment (Privacy of the Home), 14th Amendment, as well as our 4th Amendment (Right
Against Search and Seizure).
Please note that even the courts recognize that the stealth technologies exist and are in the
hands of law enforcements. In Kyllo v. United States [(99-8508) 533 U.S. 27 (2001) 190 F.3d
1041], the Supreme Court found that the use of an Agema Thermovision 210 thermal imager to
scan Kyllos home was a violation of the 4th Amendment and his privacy rights. The Court also
noted that: The ability to see through walls and other opaque barriers is a clear, and scientifically
feasible, goal of law enforcement research and development. The National Law Enforcement and
Corrections Technology Center, a program within the United States Department of Justice,
features on its Internet Website projects that include a Radar-Based Through-the-Wall
Surveillance System, Handheld Ultrasound Through the Wall Surveillance, and a Radar Flashlight
that will enable law officers to detect individuals through interior building walls
(nlectec.org/tech/proj, visited May 3, 2001).
Some devices may emit low levels of radiation that travel through-the-wall, but others, such as
more sophisticated thermal imaging devices, are entirely passive, or off-the-wall as the dissent
puts it [FN3].
By means of this correspondence, FFCHS petitions, and demands, that the Department of Justice
(1) conduct an investigation of the FBI to determine why it refuses to identify, locate, and arrest
the electronic assailants and (2) instruct the FBI to cooperate in investigating the cases regarding
victims of electronic stalking. Thank you for your attention to this urgent and distressing matter.
Sincerely yours,
Derrick C. Robinson President, FFCHS
And other board members
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 439
137
47 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 440
138
48 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 441
139
49 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 442
140
50 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
P.O. Box 9022

Cincinnati, OH 45209
Email: info@freedomfchs.com Voicemail: 1-800-571-5618
Fax: 1-866-433-4170 Website: www.freedomfchs.com
Pennsylvania Counseling Services - Lancaster City

40 Pearl Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.pacounseling.com
June 2, 2010
Dear Ms. Erin:
I am writing this letter to you on behalf of Stan Caterbone, who is a targeted individual, one of many
thousands in this country and worldwide who are victims of organized stalking and directed energy
weapons (DEW) assaults. DEW's are advanced surveillance, harassment and mind-invasive technologies
that provide access to the human mind and body for rogue elements of government, business, and
some individuals. Because the technologies are not widely known in society, people often believe that
when they hear voices in their mind that are not their own that they must be delusional. This is not
always the case. Because they are classified, most people do not realize that technologies exist today
that can remotely read and influence human thought, manipulate limbs and inner organs, cause
extreme pain, and/or influence human emotion. Because of congressional hearings in the 70s and
whistleblower accounts, weve learned that there has been secret, ongoing government research and
development of these technologies since the '50's, for almost 60 years.
However, this society remains mostly unaware that not only individual, but mind control on a mass scale
is occurring even as we speak. Therefore, many in this country are suffering greatly in ways they do not
understand, nor do those around them.
Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance (FFCHS) is one of the few organizations that is trying
to bridge this gap and is in the process of helping those who have found that they are victims of
advanced technologies that are preying on the minds and bodies of innocent Americans across this
country and the globe.
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 443
141
51 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
I believe Stan is one of the fortunate ones to have realized the truth of his situation and now the
struggle for him and others becomes finding a means of protection and relief. We have been in
emotional support of him and many others who face this same struggle today; one that our entire
society will one day grapple with hopefully sooner, rather than later. As his therapist, we appreciate
whatever support and guidance you can provide for him at this time.
Feel free to contact me at anytime if you have any questions or comments about how you may be of
help to Stan in assuring his emotional and mental well-being.
Peace and Liberty,

Derrick Robinson, President
Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance
www.freedomfchs.com
Phone: 513-344-4113
Email: derrickcrobinson@gmail.com
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 444
142
52 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mi...
1 of 11
http://www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=7123
On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of

Mind Invasive Technology
By Carole Smith
Global Research, October 18, 2007
Journal of Psycho-Social Studies, 2003.
"We have failed to comprehend that the result of the technology that originated in the years of the arms race
between the Soviet Union and the West, has resulted in using satellite technology not only for surveillance and
communication systems but also to lock on to human beings, manipulating brain frequencies by directing laser
beams, neural-particle beams, electro-magnetic radiation, sonar waves, radiofrequency radiation (RFR), soliton
waves, torsion fields and by use of these or other energy fields which form the areas of study for astro-physics.
Since the operations are characterised by secrecy, it seems inevitable that the methods that we do know about,
that is, the exploitation of the ionosphere, our natural shield, are already outdated as we begin to grasp the
implications of their use." [Excerpt]
For those of us who were trained in a psychoanalytical approach to the patient which was characterised as patient
centred, and which acknowledged that the effort to understand the world of the other person entailed an awareness
that the treatment was essentially one of mutuality and trust, the American Psychiatry Associations Diagnostic
Criteria for Schizotypal personality was always a cause for alarm. The Third Edition (1987) of Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) required that there be at least four of the characteristics set out for a
diagnosis of schizophrenia, and an approved selection of four could be: magical thinking, telepathy or sixth sense;
limited social contact; odd speech; and over-sensitivity to criticism. By 1994, the required number of qualifying
characteristics were reduced to two or more, including, say, hallucinations and negative symptoms such as
affective flattening, or disorganised or incoherent speech or only one if the delusions were bizarre or the
hallucination consisted of a voice keeping up a running commentary on the persons behaviour or thoughts. The next
edition of the DSM is not due until the year 2010.
In place of a process of a labelling which brought alienation and often detention, sectioning, and mind altering
anti-psychotic medication, many psychoanalysts and psychotherapists felt that even in severe cases of schizoid
withdrawal we were not necessarily wasting our time in attempting to restore health by the difficult work of
unravelling experiences in order to make sense of an illness. In this way, psychoanalysis has been, in its most
radical form, a critic of a society, which failed to exercise imaginative empathy when passing judgement on people.
The work of Harry Stack Sullivan, Frieda Fromm-Reichmann, Harold Searles or R.D. Laing - all trained as
psychiatrists and all of them rebels against the standard procedures provided a way of working with people very
different from the psychiatric model, which seemed to encourage a society to repress its sickness by making a
clearly split off group the carriers of it. A psychiatrist in a mental hospital once joked to me, with some truth, when
I commented on the number of carrier bags carried by many of the medicated patients around the hospital grounds,
that they assessed the progress of the patient in terms of the reduction of the number of carrier bags. It is too often
difficult to believe, however, when hearing the history of a life, that the schizophrenic was not suffering the effects
of having been made, consciously and unconsciously, the carefully concealed carrier of the ills of the family.
For someone who felt his mind was going to pieces, to be put into the stressful situation of the psychiatric
examination, even when the psychiatrist acquitted himself with kindness, the situation of the assessment procedure
itself, can be an effective way to drive someone crazy, or more crazy. (Laing, 1985, p 17). But if the accounting of
bizarre experiences more or less guaranteed you a new label or a trip to the psychiatric ward, there is even more
reason for a new group of people to be outraged about how their symptoms are being diagnosed. A doubly cruel
sentence is being imposed on people who are the victims of the most appalling abuse by scientific-military
experiments, and a totally uncomprehending society is indifferent to their evidence. For the development of a new
class of weaponry now has the capability of entering the brain and mind and body of another person by
technological means.
Harnessing neuroscience to military capability, this technology is the result of decades of research and
experimentation, most particularly in the Soviet Union and the United States. (Welsh, 1997, 2000) We have failed
to comprehend that the result of the technology that originated in the years of the arms race between the Soviet
Union and the West, has resulted in using satellite technology not only for surveillance and communication systems
but also to lock on to human beings, manipulating brain frequencies by directing laser beams, neural-particle
beams, electro-magnetic radiation, sonar waves, radiofrequency radiation (RFR), soliton waves, torsion fields and
by use of these or other energy fields which form the areas of study for astro-physics. Since the operations are
characterised by secrecy, it seems inevitable that the methods that we do know about, that is, the exploitation of
the ionosphere, our natural shield, are already outdated as we begin to grasp the implications of their use. The
patents deriving from Bernard J. Eastlunds work provide the ability to put unprecedented amounts of power in the
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 445
143
53 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
9/24/2010 9:25 PM
2 of 11

Earths atmosphere at strategic locations and to maintain the power injection level, particularly if random pulsing is
employed, in a manner far more precise and better controlled than accomplished by the prior art, the detonation of
nuclear devices at various yields and various altitudes. (ref High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project,
HAARP).
Some patents, now owned by Raytheon, describe how to make nuclear sized explosions without radiation and
describe power beam systems, electromagnetic pulses and over-the-horizon detection systems. A more disturbing
use is the system developed for manipulating and disturbing the human mental process using pulsed radio
frequency radiation (RFR), and their use as a device for causing negative effects on human health and thinking. The
victim, the innocent civilian target is locked on to, and unable to evade the menace by moving around. The beam is
administered from space. The Haarp facility as military technology could be used to broadcast global mind-control,
as a system for manipulating and disturbing the human mental process using pulsed radio frequency (RFR). The
super-powerful radio waves are beamed to the ionosphere, heating those areas, thereby lifting them. The
electromagnetic waves bounce back to the earth and penetrate human tissue.
Dr Igor Smirnov, of the Institute of Psycho-Correction in Moscow, says: It is easily conceivable that some Russian
Satan, or lets say Iranian or any other Satan, as long as he owns the appropriate means and finances, can
inject himself into every conceivable computer network, into every conceivable radio or television broadcast, with
relative technological ease, even without disconnecting cablesand intercept the radio waves in the ether and
modulate every conceivable suggestion into it. This is why such technology is rightfully feared.(German TV
documentary, 1998).
If we were concerned before about diagnostic criteria being imposed according to the classification of recognizable
symptoms, we have reason now to submit them to even harsher scrutiny. The development over the last decades
since the Cold War arms race has included as a major strategic category, psycho-electronic weaponry, the ultimate
aim of which is to enter the brain and mind. Unannounced, undebated and largely unacknowledged by scientists or
by the governments who employ them technology to enter and control minds from a distance has been unleashed
upon us. The only witnesses who are speaking about this terrible technology with its appalling implications for the
future, are the victims themselves and those who are given the task of diagnosing mental illness are attempting to
silence them by classifying their evidence and accounts as the symptoms of schizophrenia, while the dispensers of
psychic mutilation and programmed pain continue with their work, aided and unopposed.
If it was always crucial, under the threat of psychiatric sectioning, to carefully screen out any sign of confused
speech, negativity, coldness, suspicion, bizarre thoughts, sixth sense, telepathy, premonitions, but above all the
sense that others can feel my feelings, and that someone seemed to be keeping up a running commentary on your
thoughts and behaviour, then reporting these to a psychiatrist, or anyone else for that matter who was not of a
mind to believe that such things as mind-control could exist, would be the end of your claim to sanity and probably
your freedom. For one of the salient characteristics of mind-control is the running commentary, which replicates so
exactly, and surely not without design, the symptoms of schizophrenia. Part of the effort is to remind the victim that
they are constantly under control or surveillance. Programmes vary, but common forms of reminders are electronic
prods and nudges, body noises, twinges and cramps to all parts of the body, increasing heart beats, applying
pressures to internal organs all with a personally codified system of comments on thoughts and events, designed
to create stress, panic and desperation. This is mind control at its most benign. There is reason to fear the use of
beamed energy to deliver lethal assaults on humans, including cardiac arrest, and bleeding in the brain.
It is the government system of secrecy, which has facilitated this appalling prospect. There have been warning
voices. the government secrecy system as a whole is among the most poisonous legacies of the Cold War the
Cold War secrecy (which) also mandate(s) Active Deceptiona security manual for special access programs
authorizing contractors to employ cover stories to disguise their activities. The only condition is that cover stories
must be believable. (Aftergood & Rosenberg, 1994; Bulletin of Atomic Scientist). Paranoia has been aided and
abetted by government intelligence agencies.
In the United Kingdom the fortifications against any disturbing glimmer of awareness of such actual or potential
outrages against human rights and social and political abuses seem to be cast in concrete. Complete with
crenellations, ramparts and parapets, the stronghold of nescience reigns supreme. To borrow Her Majesty the
Queens recent observation: There are forces at work of which we are not aware. One cannot say that there is no
British Intelligence on the matter, as it is quite unfeasible that the existence of the technology is not classified
information. Indeed it is a widely held belief that the women protesting against the presence of cruise missiles at
Greenham Common were victims of electro-magnetic radiation at gigahertz frequency by directed energy weapons,
and that their symptoms, including cancer, were consistent with such radiation effects as reported by Dr Robert
Becker who has been a constantly warning voice against the perils of electro-magnetic radiation. The work of Allen
Frey suggests that we should consider radiation effects as a grave hazard producing increased permeability of the
blood-brain barrier, and weakening crucial defenses of the central nervous system against toxins. (Becker, 1985, p.
286). Dr Becker has written about nuclear magnetic resonance as a familiar tool in medecine known as magnetic
resonance imaging or MRI. Calcium efflux is the result of cyclotronic resonance which latter can be explained thus:
If a charged particle or ion is exposed to a steady magnetic field in space, it will begin to go into a circular or orbital,
motion at right angles to the applied magnetic field.The speed with which it orbits will be determined by the ratio
between the charge and the mass of the particle and by the strength of the magnetic field. (Becker, 1990,p.235)
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 446
144
54 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
9/24/2010 9:25 PM
3 of 11

The implications of this for wide scale aggression by using a combination of radar based energy and the use of
nuclear resonating are beyond the scope of the writer, but appear to be worth the very serious consideration of
physicists in assessing how they might be used against human beings.
Amongst medical circles, however, it has so far not been possible for the writer to find a neuroscientist, neurologist
or a psychiatrist, nor for that matter, a general medical practitioner, who acknowledges even the potential for
technological manipulation of the nervous system as a problem requiring their professional interest. There has been
exactly this response from some of Englands most eminent practitioners of the legal profession, not surprisingly,
because the information about such technology is not made available to them. They would refer anyone attempting
to communicate mind- harassment as a psychiatric problem, ignoring the crime that is being committed.
The aim here is not to attempt a comprehensive history and development of the technology of mind control. These
very considerable tasks - which have to be done under circumstances of the most extreme difficulty - have been
addressed with clarity and courage by others, who live with constant harm and threats, not least of all
contemptuous labelling. Their work can be readily accessed on the internet references given at the end of this
paper. For a well-researched outline of the historical development of electro-magnetic technology the reader should
refer to the timeline of dates and electromagnetic weapon development by Cheryl Welsh, president of Citizens
against Human Rights Abuse. (Welsh 1997; 2001). There are at least one and a half thousand people worldwide who
state they are being targeted. Mojmir Babacek, now domiciled in his native Czech Republic, after eight years of
residence in the United States in the eighties, has made a painstakingly meticulous review of the technology, and
continues his research. (Babacek 1998, 2002)
We are concerned here with reinforcing in the strongest possible terms:
i) The need for such abuses to human rights and the threats to democracy to be called to consciousness, and without
further delay.
ii) To analyse the reasons why people might defend themselves from becoming conscious of the existence of such
threats.
iii) To address the urgent need for intelligence, imagination, and information - not to mention compassion - in
dealing with the victims of persecution from this technology, and
iv) To alert a sleeping society, to the imminent threats to their freedom from the threat from fascist and covert
operations who have in all probability gained control of potentially lethal weaponry of the type we are describing.
It is necessary to emphasise that at present there is not even the means for victims to gain medical attention for
the effects of radiation from this targeting. Denied the respect of credulity of being used as human guinea pigs,
driven to suicide by the breakdown of their lives, they are treated as insane at best regarded as sad cases.
Since the presence of a permanent other in ones mind and body is by definition an act of the most intolerable
cruelty, people who are forced to bear it but who refuse to be broken by it, have no other option than to turn
themselves into activists, their lives consumed by the battle against such atrocities, their energies directed to
alerting and informing the public of things they dont want to hear or understand about evil forces at work in their
society.
It is necessary, at this point, to briefly outline a few one might say the precious few attempts by public servants
to verify the existence and dangers inherent in this field:
In January 1998, an annual public meeting of the French National Bioethics Committee was held in Paris. Its
chairman, Jean-Pierre Changeux, a neuroscientist at the Institut Pasteur in Paris, told the meeting that
advances in cerebral imaging make the scope for invasion of privacy immense. Although the equipment
needed is still highly specialized, it will become commonplace and capable of being used at a distance. That
will open the way for abuses such as invasion of personal liberty, control of behaviour and brainwashing.
These are far from being science-fiction concernsand constitute a serious risk to society. (Nature. Vol
391, 1998.
In January 1999, the European Parliament passed a resolution where it calls for an international convention
introducing a global ban on all development and deployment of weapons which might enable any form of
manipulation of human beings. It is our conviction that this ban can not be implemented without the global
pressure of the informed general public on the governments. Our major objective is to get across to the
general public the real threat which these weapons represent for human rights and democracy and to apply
pressure on the governments and parliaments around the world to enact legislature which would prohibit the
use of these devices to both government and private organisations as well as individuals. (Plenary
sessions/Europarliament, 1999)
In October 2001, Congressman Dennis J. Kucinich introduced a bill to the House of Representatives which, it
was hoped would be extremely important in the fight to expose and stop psycho-electronic mind control
experimentation on involuntary, non-consensual citizens. The Bill was referred to the Committee on Science,
and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services and International Relations. In the original bill a ban
was sought on exotic weapons including electronic, psychotronic or information weapons, chemtrails,
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 447
145
55 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
9/24/2010 9:25 PM
4 of 11

particle beams, plasmas, electromagnetic radiation, extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency
(ULF) energy radiation, or mind control technologies. Despite the inclusion of a prohibition of the basing of
weapons in space, and the use of weapons to destroy objects or damage objects in space, there is no
mention in the revised bill of any of the aforementioned mind-invasive weaponry, nor of the use of satellite
or radar or other energy based technology for deploying or developing technology designed for deployment
against the minds of human beings. (Space Preservation Act, 2002)
In reviewing the development of the art of mind-invasive technology there are a few outstanding achievements to
note:
In 1969 Dr Jose Delgado, a Yale psychologist, published a book: Physical Control of the Mind: Towards a
Psychocivilized Society. In essence, he displayed in practical demonstrations how, by means of electrical
stimulation of the brain which had been mapped out in its relations between different points and activities, functions
and sensations, - by means of electrical stimulation, how the rhythm of breathing and heartbeat could be
changed, as well as the function of most of the viscera, and gall bladder secretion. Frowning, opening and closing
of eyes and mouth, chewing, yawning, sleep, dizziness, epileptic seizures in healthy persons were induced. The
intensity of feelings could be controlled by turning the knob, which controlled the intensity of the electric current. He
states at the end of his book the hope that the new power will remain limited to scientists or some charitable elite
for the benefit of a psychocivilized society.
In the 1980s the neuromagnetometer was developed which functions as an antenna and could monitor the
patterns emerging from the brain. (In the seventies the scientists had discovered that electromagnetic pulses
enabled the brain to be stimulated through the skull and other tissues, so there was no more need to implant
electrodes in the brain). The antenna, combined with the computer, could localize the points in the brain where the
brain events occur. The whole product is called the magnetoencephalograph.
In January 2000 the Lockheed Martin neuroengineer Dr John D. Norseen, was quoted (US News and World Report,
2000) as hoping to turn the electrohypnomentalaphone, a mind reading machine, into science fact. Dr Norseen,
a former Navy pilot, claims his interest in the brain stemmed from reading a Soviet book in the 1980s claiming that
research on the mind would revolutionize the military and society at large. By a process of deciphering the brains
electrical activity, electromagnetic pulsations would trigger the release of the brains own transmitters to fight off
disease, enhance learning, or alter the minds visual images, creating a synthetic reality. By this process of
BioFusion, (Lockheed Martin, 2000) information is placed in a database, and a composite model of the brain is
created. By viewing a brain scan recorded by (functional) magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) machine, scientists
can tell what the person was doing at the time of recording say reading or writing, or recognise emotions from
love to hate. If this research pans out, says Norseen, you can begin to manipulate what someone is thinking even
before they know it. But Norseen says he is agnostic on the moral ramifications, that hes not a mad scientist
just a dedicated one. The ethics dont concern me, he says, but they should concern someone else.
The next big thing looks like being something which we might refer to as a neurocomputer but it need not
resemble a laptop it may be reducible to whatever size is convenient for use, such as a small mobile phone.
Arising from a break-through and exploitation of PSI-phenomena, it may be modelled on the nervous-psychic
activity of the brain that is, as an unbalanced, unstable system of neurotransmitters and interacting neurones, the
work having been derived from the creation of a copy of a living brain accessed by chance, and ESP and worked
on by design.
On receiving a communication from the writer on the feasibility of a machine being on the horizon which, based on
the project of collecting electromagnetic waves emanating from the brain and transmitting them into another brain
that would read a persons thoughts, or using the same procedure in order to impose somebody elses thoughts on
another brain and in this way direct his actions there was an unequivocal answer from IBM at executive level that
there was no existing technology to create such a computer in the foreseeable future. This is at some variance with
the locating of a patent numbered 03951134 on the Internet pages of IBM Intellectual Property Network for a
device, described in the patent, as capable of picking up at a distance the brain waves of a person, process them by
computer and emit correcting waves which will change the original brain waves. Similar letters addressed to each of
the four top executives of Apple Inc., in four individual letters marked for their personal attention, produced
absolutely no response. This included the ex- Vice President of the United States, Mr Al Gore, newly elected to the
Board of Directors of Apple.
Enough people have been sufficiently concerned by the reports of victims of mind control abuse to organise The
Geneva Forum, in 2002, held as a joint initiative of the Quaker United Nations Office, Geneva; the United Nations
Institute for Disarmament Research; the International Committee of the Red cross, and the Human Rights Watch
(USA), and Citizens against Human Rights Abuses (CAHRA); and the Programme for Strategic and International
Security Studies, which was represented by the Professor and Senior Lecturer from the Department of Peace
Studies at the University of Bradford.
In England, on May 25, 1995, the Guardian newspaper in the U.K. carried an article based on a report by Nic Lewer,
the peace researcher from Bradford University, which listed more than 30 different lines of research into new age
weaponssome of the research sounds even less rational. There are, according to Lewer, plans for pulsed
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 448
146
56 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
9/24/2010 9:25 PM
5 of 11

microwave beams to destroy enemy electronics, and separate plans for very-low-frequency sound beams to induce
vomiting, bowel spasm, epileptic seizures and also crumble masonry. Further, the article states, There are plans
for mind control with the use of 'psycho-correction messages transmitted by subliminal audio and visual stimuli.
There is also a plan for psychotronic weapons apparently the projection of consciousness to other locations and
another to use holographic projection to disseminate propaganda and misinformation. (Welsh, Timeline). Apart
from this notable exception it is difficult to locate any public statement of the problem in the United Kingdom.
Unfortunately, the problem of credulity does not necessarily cease with frequent mention, as in the United States, in
spite of the number of reported cases, there is still not sufficient public will to make strenuous protest against what
is not only already happening, but against what will develop if left unchecked. It appears that the administration
believes that it is necessary and justifiable, in the interests of national security, to make experimental human
sacrifices, to have regrettable casualties, for there to be collateral damage, to suffer losses in place of strife or war.
This is, of course, totally incompatible with any claims to be a democratic nation which respects the values of human
life and democracy, and such an administration which tutors its servants in the ways of such barbaric tortures must
be completely condemned as uncivilised and hypocritical.
Disbelief as a Defence Mechanism
In the face of widespread disbelief about mind-control, it seems worth analysing the basis of the mechanisms
employed to maintain disbelief:
i) In the sixties, Soviet dissidents received a significant measure of sympathy and indignant protest from western
democracies on account of their treatment, most notedly the abuse of psychiatric methods of torture to which they
were subjected. It is noteworthy that we seem to be able to access credulity, express feelings of indignant support
when we can identify with victims, who share and support our own value system, and who, in this particular
historical case, reinforced our own values, since they were protesting against a political system which also
threatened us at that time. Psychologically, it is equally important to observe that support from a safe distance, and
the benefits to the psyche of attacking a split-off bad father, the soviet authorities in this case, presents no threat
to ones internal system; indeed it relieves internal pressures. On the other hand, recognizing and denouncing a
similar offence makes very much greater psychic demands of us when it brings us into conflict with our own
environment, our own security, our own reality. The defence against disillusion serves to suppress paranoia that
our father figure, the president, the prime minister, our governments - might not be what they would like to be
seen to be.
ii) The need to deposit destructive envy and bad feelings elsewhere, on account of the inability of the ego to
acknowledge ownership of them - reinforces the usefulness of persons or groups, which will serve to contain those,
disowned, projected feelings which arouse paranoid anxieties. The concepts of mind-invasion strike at the very
heart of paranoid anxiety, causing considerable efforts to dislodge them from the psyche. The unconscious
identification of madness with dirt or excrement is an important aspect of anal aggression, triggering projective
identification as a defence.
iii) To lay oneself open to believing that a person is undergoing the experience of being invaded mentally and
physically by an unseen manipulator requires very great efforts in the self to manage dread.
iv) The defence against the unknown finds expression in the split between theory and practice; between the scientist
as innovator and the society who can make the moral decisions about his inventions; between fact and science
fiction, the latter of which can present preposterous challenges to the imagination without undue threat, because it
serves to reinforce a separation from the real.
v) Identification with the aggressor. Sadistic fantasies, unconscious and conscious, being transferred on to the
aggressor and identified with, aid the repression of fear of passivity, or a dread of punishment. This mechanism acts
to deny credulity to the victim who represents weakness. This is a common feature of satanic sects.
vi) The liberal humanist tradition which denies the worst destructive capacities of man in the effort to sustain the
belief in the great continuity of cultural and scientific tradition; the fear, in ones own past development, of not being
ongoing, can produce the psychic effect of reversal into the opposite to shield against aggressive feelings. This
becomes then the exaggerated celebration of the new as the affirmation of human genius which will ultimately be
for the good of mankind, and which opposes warning voices about scientific advances as being pessimistic,
unenlightened, unprogressive and Luddite. Strict adherence to this liberal position can act as overcompensation for
a fear of envious spoiling of good possessions, i.e. cultural and intellectual goods.
vii) Denial by displacement is also employed to ignore the harmful aspects of technology. What may be harmful for
the freedom and good of society can be masked and concealed by the distribution of new and entertaining novelties.
The technology, which puts a camera down your gut for medical purposes, is also used to limit your freedom by
surveillance. The purveyors of innovative technology come up with all sorts of new gadgets, which divert, entertain
and feed the acquisitive needs of insatiable shoppers, and bolster the economy. The theme of Everythings up to
date in Kansas City only takes on a downside when individual experience exploding breast implants, say takes
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 449
147
57 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
9/24/2010 9:25 PM
6 of 11

the gilt off the gingerbread. Out of every innovation for evil (i.e. designed for harming and destroying) some good
(i.e. public diversion or entertainment) can be promoted for profit or crowd-pleasing.
viii) Nasa is sending a spacecraft to Mars, or so we are told. They plan to trundle across the Martian surface
searching for signs of water and life. We do not hear dissenting voices about its feasibility.
Why is it that, when a person accounts that their mind is being disrupted and they are being persecuted by an
unseen method of invasive technology, that we cannot bring ourselves to believe them? Could it be that the horror
involved in the empathic identification required brings the shutters down? Conversely, the shared experience of the
blasting of objects into space brings with it the possibilities of shared potency or the relief that resonates in the
unconscious of a massive projection or evacuation a shared experience which is blessed in the name of mans
scientific genius.
ix) The desire not to be taken in, not to be taken for a fool, provides one of the most powerful and common
defence mechanism against credulity.
Power, Paranoia and Unhealthy Governments
The ability to be the bearer and container of great power without succumbing to the pressures of latent narcissistic
psychoses is an important matter too little considered. The effect of holding power and the expectation and the need
to be seen as capable of sustaining it, if not exercising it, encourages omnipotence of thought. In the wake of this, a
narcissistic overevaluation of the subjects own mental processes may set in. In the effort to hold himself together
as the possessor, container and executor of power, he (or indeed, she) may also, undergo a process of splitting
which allows him, along with others, to bear enthralled witness of himself in this illustrious role. This may mean that
the seat of authority is vacated, at least at times. The splitting process between the experiencing ego and the
perceiving ego allows the powerful leader to alternate his perception of himself inside and outside, sometimes
beside, himself. With the reinforcement of himself from others as his own narcissistic object, reality testing is
constrained. In this last respect, he has much in common with the other powerful figure of the age, the movie star.
or by those, in Freuds words, who are ruined by success.
In a world, which is facing increasing disillusion about the gulf between the public platforms on which governments
are elected, and the contingencies and pragmatics of retaining defence strategies and economic investments, the
role of military and intelligence departments, with their respective tools of domination and covert infiltration, is
increasingly alarming. Unaccountable to the public, protected from exposure and prosecution by their immunity,
licensed to lie as well as to kill, it is in the hands of these agents that very grave threats to human rights and
freedom lies. Empowered to carry out aggression through classified weapon experimentation which is undetectable,
these men and women are also open to corruption from lucrative offers of financial reward from powerful and
sinister groups who can utilize their skills, privileged knowledge and expertise for frankly criminal and fascist
purposes.
Our information about the psychological profiles of those who are employed to practice surveillance on others is
limited, but it is not difficult to imagine the effects on the personality that would ensue with the persistent practice of
such an occupation, so constantly exposed to the perversions. One gains little snatches of insight here and there. In
his book on CIA mind control research (Marks, 1988), John Marks quotes a CIA colleagues joke (always revealing
for personality characteristics): If you could find the natural radio frequency of a persons sphincter, you could
make him run out of the room real fast. (One wonders if the same amusement is derived from the ability to apply,
say infra-sound above 130 decibels, which is said to cause stoppage of the heart, according to one victim/activist
from his readings of a report for the Russian Parliament.)
Left to themselves, these servants of the state may well feel exempt from the process of moral self-scrutiny, but
the work must be dehumanising for the predator as well as the prey. It is probably true that the need to control
their agents in the field was an incentive to develop the methods in use today. It is also an effectively brutalising
training for persecuting others. Meanwhile the object, the prey, in a bid for not only for survival but also in a
desperate effort to warn his or her fellows about what is going on, attempts to turn himself into a quantum
physicist, a political researcher, a legal sleuth, an activist, a neurologist, a psychologist, a physiologist his own
doctor, since he cannot know what effects this freakish treatment might have on his body, let alone his mind. There
are always new methods to try out which might prove useful in the search to find ways of disabling and destroying
opponents air injected into brains and lungs, lasers to strike down or blind, particle beams, sonar waves, or
whatever combination of energies to direct, or destabilise or control.
Science and Scepticism
Scientists can be bought, not just by governments, but also by sinister and secret societies. Universities can be
funded by governments to develop technology for unacceptably inhumane uses. The same people who deliver the
weapons - perhaps respected scientists and academics - may cite the acceptable side of scientific discoveries, which
have been developed by experimenting on unacknowledged, unfortunate people. In a cleaned up form, they are
then possibly celebrated as a break-through in the understanding of the natural laws of the universe. It is not
implausible that having delivered the technical means for destruction, the innovator and thinker goes on, wearing a
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 450
148
58 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
9/24/2010 9:25 PM
7 of 11

different hat, to receive his (or her) Nobel Prize. There are scientists who have refused to continue to do work when
they were approached by CIA and Soviet representatives. These are the real heroes of science.
In the power struggle, much lies at stake in being the first to gain control of ultimate mind-reading and
mind-controlling technology. Like the nuclear bomb, common ownership would seem by any sane calculations to
cancel out the advantage of possession, but there is always a race to be the first to possess the latest ultimate
means of mass destruction. The most desirable form is one that can be directed at others without contaminating
oneself in the process - one that can be undetected and neatly, economically and strategically delivered. We should
be foolish to rule out secret organisations, seeing threat only from undemocratic countries and known terrorist
groups.
As consumers in a world which is increasingly one in which shopping is the main leisure activity, we should concern
ourselves to becoming alert to the ways in which human welfare may have been sacrificed to produce an awesome
new gadget. It may be the cause for celebration for the innovator, but brought about as the result of plugging in or
dialling up the living neuronal processes of an enforced experimentee. If we are concerned not to eat boiled eggs
laid by battery hens, we might not regard it morally irrelevant to scrutinise the large corporations producing
electronically innovative software. We might also be wary about the origins of the sort of bland enticements of
dating agencies who propose finding your ideal partner by matching up brain frequencies and bio-rhythms.
We do not know enough about the background of such technology, nor how to evaluate it ethically. We do not know
about its effects on the future, because we are not properly informed. If governments persist in concealing the
extent of their weapon capability in the interests of defence, they are also leaving their citizens disempowered of
the right to protest against their deployment. More alarmingly, they are leaving their citizens exposed to their
deployment by ruthless organisations whose concerns are exactly the opposite of democracy and human rights.
Back in the United Kingdom
Meanwhile, back in England, the Director of the Oxford Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Professor Colin
Blakemore, also the elective Chief Executive of the Medical Research Council writes to the author that he ... knows
of no technology (not even in the wildest speculations of neuroscientists) for scanning and collecting neuronal data
at a distance. (Blakemore, 2003, ) This certitude is at distinct variance with the fears of other scientists in Russia
and the United States, and not least of all with the fears of the French neuroscientist, Jean-Pierre Changeux of the
French National Bioethics Committee already quoted (see page 5). It is also very much at odds with the writing of
Dr Michael Persinger from the Behavioural Neuroscience Laboratory at Laurentian University in Sudbury, Ontario,
Canada. His article On the Possibility of Directly Accessing Every Human Brain by Electromagnetic Induction of
Algorithms (1995), he describes the ways that individual differences among human brains can be overcome and
comes to a conclusion about the technological possibilities of influencing a major part of the approximately six billion
people on this planet without mediation through classical sensory modalities but by generating electromagnetic
induction of fundamental algorithms in the atmosphere. Dr Persingers work is referred to by Captain John Tyler
whose work for the American Air Force and Aerospace programmes likens the human nervous system to a radio
receiver. (1990)
Very recently the leading weekly cultural BBC radio review had as one of its guests, the eminent astro-physicist and
astronomer royal, Sir Martin Rees, who has recently published a book, Our Final Century, in which he makes a
sober and reasoned case for the fifty-fifty chance that millions of people, probably in a third-world country could be
wiped out in the near future through biotechnology and bio-terrorism by error or malign release. He spoke of
this devastation as possibly coming from small groups or cults, based in the United States. few individuals with
the right technology to cause absolute mayhem. He also said that in this century, human nature is no longer a
fixed commodity, that perhaps we should contemplate the possibility that humans would even have implants in the
brain.
The other guests on this programme were both concerned with Shakespeare, one a theatre producer and the other
a writer on Shakespeare, while his remaining guest was a young woman who had a website called Spiked, the
current theme of which was Panic Attack, that is to say, Attack on Panic. This guest vigorously opposed what she felt
was the pessimism of Sir Martin, regarding his ideas as essentially eroding trust, and inducing panic. This reaction
seems to typify one way of dealing with threat and anxiety, and demonstrates the difficulty that a warning voice,
even from a man of the academic distinction of Martin Rees, has in alerting people to that which they do not want
to hear. This flight reaction was reinforced by the presenter who summed up the mornings discussion at the end of
the programme with the words: We have a moral! Less panic, more Shakespeare!
The New Barbarism
Since access to a mind-reading machine will enable the operator to access the ideas of another person, we should
prepare ourselves for a new world order in which ideas will be, as it were, up for grabs. We need not doubt that the
contents of anothers mind will be scooped up, scooped out, sorted through as if the event was a jumble sale. The
legal profession would therefore be well advised to consider the laws on Intellectual Property very judiciously in
order to acquit themselves with any degree of authenticity. We should accustom ourselves to the prospect of
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 451
149
59 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
9/24/2010 9:25 PM
8 of 11

recognizing our work coming out of the mouth of another. The prospect of wide-scale fraud, and someone posturing
in your stolen clothes will not be a pretty sight. The term personal mind enhancement is slipping in through the
back door, to borrow a term used by the Co-Director of the Center for Cognitive Liberty and Ethics, and it is being
done through technologically-induced mental co-ercion mind raping and looting. In place of, or in addition to,
cocaine, we may expect to see mind-enhanced performances on live television.
The brave new science of neuropsychiatry and brain mapping hopes to find very soon, with the fMRI scanner - this
brand new toy that scientists have got their hands on - the blob for love and the blob for guilt, (BBC Radio 4:
All in the Mind, 5 March, 2003). Soon we will be able to order a brain scan for anyone whose behaviour strikes us as
odd or bizarre, and the vicissitudes of a life need no longer trouble us in our diagnostic assessments. In his recent
Reith Lectures for the BBC (2003), Professor Ramachandran, the celebrated neuroscientist from the La Hoya
Institute in San Diego, California, has demonstrated for us many fascinating things that the brain can do. He has
talked to us about personality disorders and shown that some patients, who have suffered brain damage from head
injury, do not have the capacity to recognise their mothers. Others feel that they are dead. And indeed he has found
brain lesions in these people. In what seems to be an enormous but effortless leap, the self-styled kid in a candy
store is now hoping to prove that all schizophrenics, have damage to the right hemisphere of the brain, which
results in the inability to distinguish between fantasy (sic) and reality. Since Professor Ramachandran speaks of
schizophrenia in the same breath as denial of illness, or agnosia, it is not clear, and it would be interesting to know,
whether the person with the head injury has been aware or unaware of the head injury. Also does the patient derive
comfort and a better chance at reality testing when he is told of the lesion? Does he feel better when he has
received the diagnosis? And what should the psychoanalysts and the psychiatrists, - feel about all those years of
treating people of whose head injuries they were absolutely unaware? Was this gross negligence? Were we
absolutely deluded in perceiving recovery in a sizeable number of them?
It is, however, lamentable that a neuroscientist with a professed interest in understanding schizophrenia should
seek to provide light relief to his audience by making jokes about schizophrenics being people who are convinced
that the CIA has implanted devices in their brain to control their thoughts and actions, or that aliens are controlling
them. (Reith Lecture, No 5, 2003).
There is a new desire for concretisation. The search for meaning has been replaced by the need for hard proof. If
it doesnt light up or add up it doesnt have validity. The physician of the mind has become a surgeon. He found a
lump as big as a grapefruit!
Facing up to the Dread and Fear of the Uncanny
Freud believed that an exploration of the uncanny would be a major direction of exploration of the mind in this
century. The fear of the uncanny has been with us for a very long time. The evil eye, or the terrifying double, or
intruder, is a familiar theme in literature, notably of Joseph Conrad in The Secret Sharer, and Maupassants short
story, Le Horla. Freuds analysis of the uncanny led him back to the old animistic conception of the universe: it
seems as if each one of us has been through a phase of individual development corresponding to the animistic phase
in primitive men, that none of us has passed through it without preserving certain residues and traces of it which
are still capable of manifesting themselves, and that everything which now strikes us as uncanny fulfils the
condition of touching those residues of animistic mental activity within us and bringing them to expression. (Freud:
1919. p.362)
The separation of birth, and the childhood fear of spooks in the night, also leave their traces in each and every one
of us. The individual experience of being alone in ones mind the solitary fate of man which has never been
questioned before, and upon which the whole history of civilised nurture is based - is now assaulted head-on. Since
growing up is largely synonymous with acceptance of ones aloneness, the effort to assuage it is the basis for
compassion and protection of others; it is the matrix for the greatest good, that of ordinary human kindness, and is
at the heart of the communicating power of great art. Even if we must all live and die alone, we can at least share
this knowledge in acts of tenderness which atone for our lonely state. In times of loss and mental breakdown, the
starkness of this aloneness is all too clear. The best of social and group constructiveness is an effort to allay the
psychotic anxieties that lie at the base of every one of us, and which may be provoked under extreme enough
conditions.
The calculated and technological entry into another persons mind is an act of monumental barbarism which
obliterates perhaps with the twiddling of a dial the history and civilisation of mans mental development. It is
more than an abuse of human rights, it is the destruction of meaning. For any one who is forced into the hell of
living with an unseen mental rapist, the effort to stay sane is beyond the scope of tolerable endurance. The
imaginative capacity of the ordinary mind cannot encompass the horror of it. We have attempted to come to terms
with the experiments of the Nazis in concentration camps. We now have the prospect of systematic control
authorised by men who issue instructions through satellite communications for the destruction of societies while
they are driving new Jaguars and Mercedes, and going to the opera.
This is essentially about humiliation, and disempowerment. It is a manifestation of rage acted out by those who fear
impotence with such dread, that their whole effort is directed into the emasculation and destruction of the terrifying
rival of their unconscious fantasies. In this apocalypse of the mind the punitive figure wells up as if out of the bowels
of the opera stage, and this phantasmagoria is acted out on a global scale. These men may be mad enough to
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 452
150
60 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
9/24/2010 9:25 PM
9 of 11

believe they are creating a psychocivilised world order. For anyone who has studied damaged children, it is more
resonant of the re-enactment from the unconscious, reinforced by a life devoid of the capacity for empathic
identification, of the obscenities of the abused and abusing child in the savage nursery. Other people -which were to
them like Action Man toys to be dismembered, or Barbie Dolls to be obscenely defiled - become as meaningless in
their humanity as pixillated dots on a screen.
Although forced entry into a mind is by definition obscene, an abbreviated assessment of the effects that
mind-invaded people describe testifies to the perverted nature of the experiments. Bizarre noises are emitted
from the body, a body known well enough by its owner to recognise the noises as extrinsic; air is pumped in and out
of orifices as if by a bicycle pump. Gradually the repertoire is augmented - twinges and spasms to the eyes, nose,
lips, strange tics, pains in the head, ringing in the ears, obstructions in the throat, pressure on the bowel and
bladder causing incontinence; tingling in the fingers, feet, pressures on the heart, on breathing, dizziness, eye
problems leading to cataracts; running eyes, running nose; speeding up of heart beats and the raising of pressure in
the heart and chest; breathing and chest complaints leading to bronchitis and deterioration of the lungs; agonizing
migraines; being woken up at night, sometimes with terrifying jolts ; insomnia; intolerable levels of stress from the
loss of ones privacy. This collection of assorted symptoms is a challenge to any medical practitioner to diagnose.
There are, more seriously, if the afore-going is characterised as non-lethal, the potential lethal effects since the
capability of ultrasound and infra-sound to cause cardiac arrest, and brain lesions, paralysis and blindness, as well
as blinding by laser beam, or inducing asphyxia by altering the frequencies which control breathing in the brain,
epileptic seizure all these and others may be at the fingertips of those who are developing them. And those who
do choose to use them may be sitting with the weapon, which resembles, say, a compact mobile telephone, on the
restaurant table next to the bottle of wine, or beside them at the swimming pool.
Finally if the victims at this point in the new history of this mind-control, cannot yet prove their abuse, it must be
asserted that, faced with the available information about technological development it is certainly not possible for
those seeking to evade such claims to disprove them. To wait until the effects become widespread will be too late.
For these and other reasons which this paper has attempted to address, we would call for an
acknowledgement of such technology at a national and international level. Politicians, scientists and
neurologists, neuroscientists, physicists and the legal profession should, without further delay, demand public
debate on the existence and deployment of psychotronic technology; and for the declassification of
information about such devices which abuse helpless people, and threaten democratic freedom.
Victims accounts of abuse should be admitted to public account, and the use of psycho-electronic weapons
should be made illegal and criminal,
The medical profession should be helped to recognise the symptoms of mind-control and psychotronic abuse,
and intelligence about their deployment should be declassified so that this abuse can be seen to be what it is,
and not interpreted automatically as an indication of mental illness.
If, in the present confusion and insecurity about the search for evidence of weapons of mass destruction, we
conclude that failure to locate them - whatever the truth of the matter encourages us to be generally complacent,
then we shall be colluding with very dark forces at work if we conclude that a course of extreme vigilance signifies
paranoia. For there may well be other weapons of mass destruction being developed and not so far from home;
weapons which, being even more difficult to locate, are developed invisibly, unobstructed, unheeded in our midst,
using human beings as test-beds. Like ESP, the methods being used on humans have not been detectable using
conventional detection equipment. It is likely that the signals being used are part of a physics not known to
scientists without the highest level of security clearance. To ignore the evidence of victims is to deny, perhaps with
catastrophic results, the only evidence which might otherwise lead the defenders of freedom to becoming alert to
the development of a fearful new methods of destruction. Manipulating terrorist groups and governments alike,
these sinister and covert forces may well be very thankful for the professional derision of the victims, and for public
ignorance.
References
Laing, R.D. (1985) : Wisdom, Madness and Folly: The Making of a Psychiatrist. Macmillan, 1985
Welsh, Cheryl (1997): Timeline of Important Dates in the History of Electromagnetic Technology and Mind Control,
at:
www.dcn.davis.ca.us/~welsh/timeline.htm
Welsh, Cheryl (2001):Electromagnetic Weapons: As powerful as the Atomic Bomb, President Citizens Against
Human Rights Abuse, CAHRA Home Page: U.S. Human Rights Abuse Report: www.dcn.davis.ca.us/~welsh
/emr13.htm
Begich, Dr N. and Manning, J.: 1995 Angels Dont Play this HAARP, Advances in Tesla Technology, Earthpulse Press.
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 453
151
61 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
9/24/2010 9:25 PM
10 of 11

ZDF TV:
Secret Russia: Moscow The Zombies of the Red Czars, Script to be published in Resonance, No. 35
Aftergood, Steven and Rosenberg, Barbara: The Soft Kill Fallacy, in The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Sept/Oct
1994.
Becker, Dr Robert: 1985,The Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life, William Morrow, N.Y.
Babacek, Mojmir: International Movement for the Ban of Manipulation of The Human Nervous System:
http://mindcontrolforums.com/babacek.htm and go to: Ban of Manipulation of Human Nervous System
Is it Feasible to Manipulate the Human Brain at a Distance?
www.aisjca-mft.org/braindist.htm
Psychoelectronic Threat to Democracy
http://mindcontrolforums.com/babacek.htm
Nature: Advances in Neuroscience May Threaten Human Rights, Vol, 391, Jan. 22, 1998, p. 316; (ref Jean- Pierre
Changeux)
Space Preservation Act: Bill H.R.2977 and HR 3616 IH in 107th Congress 2nd Session: see:
www.raven1.net/govptron.htm
Sessions European Parliament:
www.europarl.eu.int/home/default_en.htm?redirected=1
Click at Plenary Sessions, scroll down to Reports by A4 number, click, choose 1999 and fill in oo5 to A4
Delgado, Jose M.R: 1969. Physical Control of the Mind: Towards a Psychocivilized Society, Vol. 41, World
Perspectives, Harper Row, N.Y.
US News & World Report: Lockheed Martin Aeronautics/ Dr John Norseen; Report January 3/10 2000, P.67
Freud, Sigmund: 1919: Art and Literature: The Uncanny. Penguin,
Also Those Wrecked by Success.
Marks, John: 1988 :The CIA and Mind Control the Search for the Manchurian Candidate, ISBN 0-440-20137-3
Persinger, M.A. On the Possibility of Directly Accessing Every Human Brain by Electromagnetic Induction of
Fundamental Algorythms; In Perception and Motor Skills, June, 1995, vol. 80, p. 791 799
Tyler, J.Electromagnetic Spectrum in Low Intensity Conflict, in Low Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology,
ed. Lt. Col. J. Dean, USAF, Air University Press, Centre For Aerospace Doctrine, Research and Education, Maxwell
Air Force base, Alabama, June, 1986.
Rees, Martin Our Final Century: 2003, Heinemann.
Conrad, Joseph: The Secret Sharer, 1910. Signet Classic.
Maupassant, Guy de: Le Horla, 1886. Livre de Poche.
Carole Smith is a British psychoanalyst. In recent years she has been openly critical of government use of intrusive
technology on non-consenting citizens for the development of methods of state control. Carole Smith
E-mail: rockpool@dircon.co.uk
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Centre for
Research on Globalization. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will
not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in this article.
To become a Member of Global Research
The CRG grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not
modified. The source and the author's copyright must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including
commercial internet sites, contact: crgeditor@yahoo.com
www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political,
economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for
research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission
from the copyright owner.
For media inquiries: crgeditor@yahoo.com
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 454
152
62 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
9/24/2010 9:25 PM
11 of 11

Copyright Carole Smith, Journal of Psycho-Social Studies, 2003., 2007
The url address of this article is: www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=7123
Copyright 2005-2007 GlobalResearch.ca

Web site engine by Polygraphx Multimedia Copyright 2005-2007
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 455
153
63 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
9/24/2010 9:25 PM
scaterbone@live.com
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com
www.scribd.com/amgroup01
www.facebook.com/scaterbone
www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone
www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone
http://www.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup
Stan J. Caterbone
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
ILLEGAL NO TRESPASS NOTICES AGAINST

STAN J. CATERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Violations of Public Accommodations Law re Discrimination
and Anti-Trust Violations with False Statements to Authorities
March 14, 2010
Work-In-Progress
Community Stalking and Organized Libel/Slander Campaign Strategy Issue a few every
year to support false arrests; false imprisonment; fabricated mental illness history. In addition to
isolate by prohibiting entrance to major entertainment venues with good live music. Prohibit from
defending against the lies and slander in public to a minimum. Also, destroy history of strong
Christian values and church attendance on a weekly basis by keeping away from church. The
Millersville University Graduate Studies No Trespass Notice was accommodated by the denial of
entitled benefits of LETA Job Training Education Course of the Paralegal program at HACC during
the same time period.
1. David Pflumm Properties by David Pflumm Served by State Constable in June of

2005, original not signed by David Pflumm
2. Eden Resort Inn, by Drew Anthon, Owner Sent via 1st Class Mail in 2005.
3. Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, by Shawn Long, Esq., Attorney representing
Fulton Bank in 2006 Sent via 1st Class Mail
4. Lancaster Newspapers, Inc., by Steve Weaver, Manager in 2006, No Notice,
Corraborated by Jack Buckwalter, Chairman and CEO and George Warner, Atty with Barley
Snyder, LLC, No Formal Notice
5. Ruby Tuesday, Manor Shopping Center, Lancaster, by Manager and Lancaster City
Police in 2006, No Formal Notice
6. Alley Kat Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster by Bartender Ms. Santinello, Brett Stabley,
and Lancaster City Police, No formal Notice in 2006
7. Village Nightclub, Lancaster by George in 2008, No Formal Notice
8. Marion Court Restaurant, Lancaster, by Security Personnel, corroborated by Michael
Geesey, in 2008, No Formal Notice
9. Valentinos Cafe, Lancaster, by Jeanine, Bartender,in 2008, corroborated by John
Valentino, Owner, No Formal Notice
10. Brunswick Hotel, Lancaster, by Staff Employees, in 2008, No Formal Notice
11. Lancaster County Library and Duke Street Business Center, by Executive Director in
March of 2009, by 1st Class Mail
12. Anne Bailey's Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Manager in 2009, No Formal Notice
13. Millersville University Graduate Studies and Millersville University, Millersville, by
Lori Austin, Judicial Affairs, via Certified Mail in June of 2009.
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 456
154
64 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
14. TGIF Friday's, Lancaster, by Manager, in January of 2010, No Formal Notice

15. Lucky Dog Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Robert Donnelly, in January of 2010, No
Formal Notice
16. Saint Mary's Catholic Church, Lancaster, by Don Spica, Usher and Lancaster City Police
Department in Feb of 2010, No Formal Notice
17. O'Halloran's Bar, Lancaster, March 25, 2010 by Male Staff Employee. No Formal Notice.
18. Fulton Bank, Fulton Financial Corporation, March 26, 2010 by Susan Follmer, Security
Officer.
Dated: March 29, 2010
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 457
155
65 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 458
156
66 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,

http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/
mailto: amgroup01@msn.com
717.427-1621 Fax
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigator

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE LITIGATOR

24 CRIMINAL CHARGES DISMISS/WITHDRAWN/NOT-GUILTY
1987 TO 2007
1. 09/01/1987 Cc2706 Terroristic Threats - M1 Quashed / Dismis / Demur Sus
2. 09/03/1987 Cc2902-1 Unlawful Restraint - M1 Quashed / Dismis / Demur Sus
3. 09/03/1987 Cc3304a2 Criminal Mischief - F3 Nolle Prossed / Withdrawn
4. 09/03/1987 Cc3502 Burglary - F1 Quashed / Dismis / Demur Sus
5. 09/03/1987 Cc3701al Robbery - F1 Quashed /Dismis /Demur Sus
6. 09/03/1987 Cc3921a Theft By Unlwf Taking Or Dispo F3 Nolle Prossed / Withdrawn
6. 09/03/1987 Cc3933a1 Unlawful Use Of Computer - F3 Nolle Prossed /Withdrawn
7. 09/03/1987 Cc3933a2 Unlawful Use Of Computer - F3 Quashed / Disnis / Demur Sus
8. 12/05/2006 1 18 5503 A2 Disorderly Conduct-Unreasonable Noise - Withdrawn (Lower Court)
9. 12/05/2006 1 18 3926 A4 Theft Of Services-Acquisition Of Services Withdrawn (Lower Court)
10. 12/05/2006 1 18 2709 A7 Harassment - Comm. Repeatedly In Another Manner Withdrawn (Lower Court)
11. 01/23/2007 1 285-21d No Parking Or Stopping Permitted Withdrawn (Lower Court)
12. 01/23/2007 1 285-30a Meter Violation Withdrawn (Lower Court)
14. 01/23/2007 1 18 6501 A1 Scatter Rubbish Upon Land/Stream Etc Dismissed (Lower Court)
15. 01/23/2007 1 285-21d No Parking Or Stopping Permitted Withdrawn (Lower Court)
16. 01/23/2007 1 285-30a Meter Violation Withdrawn (Lower Court)
17. 01/18/2007 1 75 1543 A Driv While Oper Priv Susp Or Revoked Not Guilty
18. 01/18/2007 1 75 1786 F Oper Veh W/O Req'd Financ Resp Not Guilty
19. 04/30/2007 1 18 5503 A4/ Disorder Conduct Hazardous/Physi Off Not Guilty
20. 04/30/2007 2 18 5507 A / Obstruction Highways Not Guilty
21. 04/30/2007 3/ 18 2709 A3 Harassment - Course Of Conduct W/No Legitimate Purpose Nolle Prossed
22. 04/30/2007 1 75 3111 A / Disregard Traffic Control Device Not Guilty Nolle Prossed
23. 05/10/2007 M2 18 5104 Resist Arrest/Other Law Enforce 08/04/2006 K4775120
24. 05/10/2007 3 M1 18 908 A Make Repairs/Sell/Etc Offens Weap 08/04/2006 K4775120 Nolle Prossed
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 459
157
67 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
ReceivablesPage
Page 460
158
68 of 523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
29, 2016
30,
U.S. District Court COINTELPRO

16-4014 CATERBONE
USED TO
v.OBSTRUCT
United States,
JUSTICE
et.al.,
Stan J. Caterbone
Surveillance,
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
November 28, 2016
James Comey, Director
FBI Headquarters
935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20535-0001
(202) 324-3000
Re:
ALLEGATION: COINTELPRO PROGRAM WITH HARASSMENT USED TO OBSTRUCT

JUSTICE IN MY CIVIL AND CRIMINAL COURT PROCEEDINGS
Dear Director Comey,

It comes with great regret and frustration that I must write you this unfortunate letter,
however, I see no other way to stop these attacks against me while I attempt to litigate in
Federal, State, and Local Courts. My most recent case, US Supreme Court Case No. 16-6822.
For your information COINTELPRO is defined as this:
COINTELPRO (a portmanteau derived from COunter INTELligence PROgram) was a series of
covert, and at times illegal,[1][2] projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI) aimed at surveilling, infiltrating, discrediting and disrupting domestic political
organizations.[3]
FBI records show that COINTELPRO resources targeted groups and individuals that the FBI
deemed subversive,[4] including anti-Vietnam War organizers, activists of the Civil Rights
Movement or Black Power movement (e.g., Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Black Panther Party),
feminist organizations, anti-colonial movements (such as Puerto Rican independence groups like
the Young Lords), and a variety of organizations that were part of the broader New Left.
FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover issued directives governing COINTELPRO, ordering FBI agents to
"expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, neutralize or otherwise eliminate" the activities of these
movements and especially their leaders.[5][6] Under Hoover, the agent in charge of COINTELPRO
was William C. Sullivan.[7] Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy personally authorized some of
these programs.[8] Although Kennedy only gave written approval for limited wiretapping of King's
phones "on a trial basis, for a month or so",[9] Hoover extended the clearance so his men were
"unshackled" to look for evidence in any areas of King's life they deemed worthy.[10]
Obstruction of Justice is defined as this as it relates to me and this dire situation:

(1) Whoever kills or attempts to kill another person with intent to retaliate against any person for
(A) the attendance of a witness or party at an official proceeding, or any testimony given or any
record, document, or other object produced by a witness in an official proceeding; or
(B) providing to a law enforcement officer any information relating to the commission or possible
LETTER
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
to Director
MEDIALitigation
GROUP
Comey, Accounts
FBI
ReceivablesPage
Page
Page
159
461
69
1 of 523
169
221
5
79
Wednesday
Tuesday
Monday November
December 27,
28, 2016
29,
30,

16-4014 CATERBONE
USED TO
v.OBSTRUCT
United States,
JUSTICE
et.al.,
commission of a Federal offense or a violation of conditions of probation, supervised release,

parole, or release pending judicial proceedings.
In the article by By Rahul D. Manchanda, Esq. Dated Aug 22, 2016, The Surreptitious
Reincarnation of COINTELPRO with the COPS Gang-Stalking Program
linked here:
http://moderndiplomacy.eu/index.phpoption=com_k2&view=item&id=1686:thesurreptitious-reincarnation-of-cointelpro-with-the-cops-gang-stalkingprogram&Itemid=488
Mr. Manchanda writes,
In 1975 Senator Frank Church convened a joint senatorial/congressional inquiry
into the egregious human rights and civil liberties violations of the Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA), National Security Agency (NSA), as well as the
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) against people both foreign and
domestic. Such blatant transgressions included the neutralization and
elimination of political dissidents, enemies of the state, real or imagined
threats to National Security, and anyone else on the proverbial shit list of the
Military Industrial Complex (MIC).
The Church Committee was the United States Senate Select Committee to Study
Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, a U.S. Senate committee
chaired by Senator Frank Church (D ID) in 1975. A precursor to the U.S. Senate Select
Committee on Intelligence, the committee investigated intelligence gathering for illegality
by the aforementioned agencies after certain activities had been revealed by the Watergate
affair.
Some famous examples which have since emerged include: (1) the FBI sending letters to
Martin Luther King Jr encouraging him to kill himself or else they would tell the world about
his sexual proclivities; (2) the planned or successful assassinations of foreign leaders such
as Fidel Castro, Patrice Lumumba, and countless other South American, Middle Eastern or
Asian leaders; (3) the wholesale undermining of entire foreign economies if they
democratically elected someone at odds with the elite power structure deep state of the
United States such as what occurred against Salvatore Allende of Guatemala; (4) the
possible assassination of John F Kennedy; (5) revelations of Christopher Pyle in January
1970 of the U.S. Army's spying on the civilian population; (6) the December 22, 1974 New
York Times article by Seymour Hersh detailing operations engaged in by the CIA over the
years that had been dubbed the "family jewels, involving covert action programs involving
assassination attempts against foreign leaders and covert attempts to subvert foreign
governments were reported for the first time; (7) efforts by intelligence agencies to collect
information on the political activities of US citizens; and (8) countless other examples, both
overseas and domestically.
The end result of the Church Committee Hearings was the outright banning on CIA
assassinations as well as the FBI/DOJ COINTELPRO gang-stalking programs. In 1975 and
1976, the Church Committee published fourteen reports on various U.S. intelligence
agencies' formation, operations, and the alleged abuses of law and of power that they had
committed, with recommendations for reform, some of which were later put in place.
According to attorney Brian Glick in his book War at Home, the FBI used four
main methods during COINTELPRO:
(1) Infiltration: Agents and informers did not merely spy on political activists. Their main
LETTER
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
to Director
MEDIALitigation
GROUP
Comey, Accounts
FBI
ReceivablesPage
Page
Page
160
462
70
2 of 523
169
221
5
79
Wednesday
Tuesday
Monday November
December 27,
28, 2016
29,
30,

16-4014 CATERBONE
USED TO
v.OBSTRUCT
United States,
JUSTICE
et.al.,
purpose was to discredit and disrupt. Their very presence served to undermine trust and
scare off potential supporters. The FBI and police exploited this fear to smear genuine
activists as agents;
(2) Psychological warfare: The FBI and police used myriad "dirty tricks" to undermine
progressive movements. They planted false media stories and published bogus leaflets and
other publications in the name of targeted groups. They forged correspondence, sent
anonymous letters, and made anonymous telephone calls. They spread misinformation
about meetings and events, set up pseudo movement groups run by government agents,
and manipulated or strong armed parents, employers, landlords, school officials and others
to cause trouble for activists. They used bad jacketing to create suspicion about targeted
activists, sometimes with lethal consequences;
(3) Harassment via the legal system: The FBI and police abused the legal system to
harass dissidents and make them appear to be criminals. Officers of the law gave perjured
testimony and presented fabricated evidence as a pretext for false arrests and wrongful
imprisonment. They discriminatorily enforced tax laws and other government regulations
and used conspicuous surveillance, "investigative" interviews, and grand jury subpoenas in
an effort to intimidate activists and silence their supporters;
(4) Illegal force: The FBI conspired with local police departments to threaten dissidents;
to conduct illegal break ins in order to search dissident homes; and to commit vandalism,
assaults, beatings and assassinations. The object was to frighten or eliminate dissidents
and disrupt their movements.
Unfortunately I cannot leave my home with being stalked, harassed and threatened by
neighbors, passerby's, etc., On a daily basis I have someone, or groups of people entering my
home, vandalizing, stealing, and poisoning my food. To make matters worse, this protocol follows
me in federal, state, and local courthouses. Every electronic device that I have and use is
compromised and hacked in some fashion. Every online account is the same, and every financial
account, including checking accounts, vendor accounts, utilities, etc., contains some form of fraud
and theft by deception costing me money.
Well, the following links are my supporting evidence, and NOW I WISH YOU AND YOUR
FAMILY A VERY HAPPY AND MERRY CHRISTMAS. DON'T EVER TAKE YOUR FREEDOM FOR
GRANTED, SIR! I WISH I HAD THE FREEDOM YOU AND YOUR FAMILY ENJOYS.
STAN J. CATERBONE and CONFLICTS WITH THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION Monday November 14, 2016 https://www.scribd.com/document/331068312/Stan-J-Caterbone-andConflicts-With-the-Trump-Administration-Monday-November-14-2016
FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND ILLEGAL INTERROGATIONS by U.S. Intelligence

Agencies November 12, 2016 https://www.scribd.com/document/330869219/False-Imprisonments-andIllegal-Interrogations-by-U-S-Intelligence-Agencies-November-12-2016
LETTER
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
to Director
MEDIALitigation
GROUP
Comey, Accounts
FBI
ReceivablesPage
Page
Page
161
463
71
3 of 523
169
221
5
79
Wednesday
Tuesday
Monday November
December 27,
28, 2016
29,
30,

16-4014 CATERBONE
USED TO
v.OBSTRUCT
United States,
JUSTICE
et.al.,
Stan J. Caterbone LOCAL, STATE, and FEDERAL COURT DOCKET SHEETS as of

November 12, 2016 - https://www.scribd.com/document/330921500/Stan-JCaterbone-Local-State-And-Federal-Court-811-Pages-Bookmarks-Docket-Sheetsas-of-November-12-2016
FEDS PROBE FULTON BANK and 3 other SUBSIDIARY BANKS of FULTON

FINANCIAL with STAN J. CATERBONE CIVIL ACTIONS and Mind Control Research
of Monday November 7, 2016 https://www.scribd.com/document/330528930/Feds-Probe-Fulton-Bank-and-3Other-Subsidiary-Banks-of-Fulton-Financial-With-Stan-J-Caterbone-Civil-Actionsand-Mind-Control-Research-of-Monday-Novem
U.S. SUPREME COURT DOCKET, U.S. SUPREME COURT PEITIION, AND Letter
REQUEST FOR COMMUTATION of the Sentence of Lisa Michell Lambert to
President Obama, November 15, 2016 https://www.scribd.com/document/331393349/Supreme-Court-of-the-UnitedStates-Case-No-16-8822-DOCKET-and-COMMUTATION-LETTER-to-OBAMA-ReCATERBONE-v-Allison-Hallet-Re-Lisa-Lambert-Habeus-Nove
Stan J. Caterbone United Nations Human Rights Council of Geneva Switzerland

Complaint and Exhibit re U.S. Sponsored Mind Control, Oct 4, 2009.pdf
https://www.scribd.com/document/291083335/Stan-J-Caterbone-United-NationsHuman-Rights-Council-of-Geneva-Switzerland-Complaint-and-Exhibit-re-U-SSponsored-Mind-Control-October-4-2009-pdf
CATERBONE v. Unted States of America, et.al., Case No. 16-cv-0414 in the United
States Disctrict Court for Eastern Pennsylvania
https://www.scribd.com/document/318862497/CATERBONE-v-the-United-States-ofAmerica-Et-al-COMPLAINT-July-20-2016-Ver-2-0-Full
LETTER
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
to Director
MEDIALitigation
GROUP
Comey, Accounts
FBI
ReceivablesPage
Page
Page
162
464
72
4 of 523
169
221
5
79
Wednesday
Tuesday
Monday November
December 27,
28, 2016
29,
30,

16-4014 CATERBONE
USED TO
v.OBSTRUCT
United States,
JUSTICE
et.al.,
Respectfully,
___________/S/____________
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
ACTIVE COURT CASES
J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re ALL
U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 16-6822 PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI re Case No. 16-1149
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-3400
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa
U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16-cv-1751 PETITION FOR HABEUS CORPUS
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Case No. 2016-462 Complaint against
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane
Superior Court of Pennsylvania Summary Appeal Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016, AMICUS for Kathleen
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 16-10157
LETTER
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
to Director
MEDIALitigation
GROUP
Comey, Accounts
FBI
ReceivablesPage
Page
Page
163
465
73
5 of 523
169
221
5
79
Wednesday
Tuesday
Monday November
December 27,
28, 2016
29,
30,
Stan J. Caterbone

1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
April 20, 2016
Stan J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group Biography

Present - Advanced Media Group, President, Owner, and Founder.
In 1987 I became a federal whistleblower for the case of local defense contractor International Signal
and Control, or ISC. ISC was a black ops program for the NSA and CIA that was convicted in 1992 for
an elaborate scheme to arm Iraq and other Middle Eastern countries with a broad array of weapons,
most notably cluster bombs. It was the third larges fraud in U.S. History at that time. I have been a
victim of organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and direct energy weapons since 2005.
I had also been telepathic since 2005. In 2005 the U.S. Sponsored Mind Control turned into an all-out
assault of mental telepathy; synthetic telepathy; hacking of all electronic devices; vandilism and thefts
of personal property, extortions, intellectual property violations, obstruction of justice; violations of due
process; thefts and modifications of court documents; and pain and torture through the use of directed
energy devices and weapons that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted
victim. This assault was no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal
action in U.S. District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288. This
assault began after the handlers remotely trained/sychronized Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy.
The main difference opposed to most other victims of this technology is that I am connected 24/7 with
the same person who declares telepathically she is a known celebrity. Over the course of 10 years I
have been telepathic with at least 20 known persons and have spent 10 years trying to validate and
confirm their identities without success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the
Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment and act on the
numerous formal complaints that are filed in their respective offices. Most complaints are focused on
the routine victimization's of a targeted individual including but not limited to stalking, harassment,
threats, vandalism, thefts, extortion, burglaries, false imprisonments, fabricated mental health warrants
or involuntary commitments, pain and torture to the body, and most often the cause of obstruction of
justice is the computer hacking.
I have a very sophisticated and authentic library of evidence of the use of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
technologies on my father and brother that dates back to the 1940's while my father was in the U.S.
Navy after he graduated with honors from Air Gunners School in Florida, including an affidavit motorized
and authenticated by my father in 1996. My brother served in the U.S. Air force and was victim to LSD
experiments of the infamous MKULTRA program in the late 1960's.
In 2015 I filed an amicus curie on behalf of Lisa Michelle Lambert who was convicted in 1992 of the
murder of Laurie Show, both of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. I currently am in litigation in the U.S. Third
Circuit Court of Appeals and in February of 2016 Lisa Michelle Lambert published her book titled
Corruption in Lancaster County My Story, which is available in bookstores and on Amazon.com. I
am in frequent contact with her co-author, Dave Brown of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Stan J.
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone/Advanced
Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUPMedia
Accounts
Valuation
Group
ReceivablesPage
Receivables
BiographyPage
Page
164
466
74
1 of 6523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday
Wednesday,
November
December
April 20,
29, 2016
30,
27,
In 2009 I Proposed an ORGANIZED STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS HARASSMENT BILL
to Pennsylvania House of Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster, Pennsylvania) and City of Lancaster
Mayor Richard Gray in 2009. The draft legislation is the work of Missouri House of Representative Jim
Guest, who has been working on helping victims of these horrendous crimes for years. The bill will
provide protections to individuals who are being harassed, stalked, harmed by surveillance, and
assaulted; as well as protections to keep individuals from becoming human research subjects, tortured,
and killed by electronic frequency devices, directed energy devices, implants, and directed energy
weapons. I again reintroduced the bill to the Pennsylvania General Assembly in 2015 and frequented
the Pennsylvania Capitol trying to find support and a sponsor; which I still do to this day.
In 2006 I began his role as an Activist Shareholder for Fulton Financial, which is listed as "FULT" on the
NASDAQ stock exchange. As a founder of Financial Management Group, Ltd., a full service financial firm,
Stan J. Caterbone has drawn upon the success in developing the strategic vision for his company and
the experience gained in directing the legal affairs and public offering efforts in dealing with Fulton
Financial. I have been in recent discussions with the Fulton Financial Board of Directors with regards to
various complaints dealing with such issues as the Resource Bank acquisition and the subprime failures.
I believe that Fulton Financial needs management to become more aggressive in it's strategic planning
and the performance it expects from it's management team in order to increase shareholder value.
Expanding the footprint of the regional bank has not yielded an increase to the bottom line that is
consistent with the expectations of shareholders. Lancaster County has seen several local banking
institutions acquired by larger regional banks, thus increasing the competition Fulton Financial will see in
it's local marketplace as well as in it's regional footprint.
In 2005 I, as a Pro Se Litigant filed several civil actions as Plaintiffs that are in current litigation in the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States Third District
Court of Appeals, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, The Pennsylvania Superior Court, the
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, The Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania.
These litigations include violations of intellectual property rights, anti-trust violations, and interference
of contracts relating to several business interests. Central to this litigation is the Digital Movie, Digital
Technologies, Financial Management Group, Ltd,/FMG Advisory, Ltd., and its affiliated businesses along
with a Federal False Claims Act or Federal Whistleblowers Act regarding the firm of International Signal
and Control, Plc., (ISC) the $1Billion Dollar Fraud and the Export violations of selling arms to South
Africa and Iraq. This litigation dates back to 1987. Stan J. Caterbone was a shareholder of ISC, and was
solicited by ISC executives for professional services. The Federal False Claims Act is currently part of
RICO Civil Complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and the
Third Circuit Court of Appeals, as docket no. 05-2288.
In 2005 Advanced Media Group/Project Hope filed a Civil Action in the Court of Common Pleas of
Lancaster County against Drew Anthon and the Eden Resort Inn for their attempts to withhold the
Tourism Tax and Hotel Tax that supports the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center & Marriot. We also
proposed an alternative plan to move the Convention Center to the Hotel Brunswick and Lancaster
Square to all of the major stakeholders. The Lancaster County Convention Center is finally under
construction with a March 2009 Opening date.
In 2005 I was selected to attend the Clinton Global Initiative in New York City after submission of
an essay with and application. I received the invitation from Bruce R. Lindsey, Chief Executive Officer of
the William J. Clinton Foundation.
In 2005 I began our philanthropic endeavors by spending our energies and working with such
organizations as; ONE.org, Livestrong.org, WoundedWarriors.org, The Clinton Global Initiative,
Lancaster Convention Center Authority, Lancaster Chamber of Commerce, Toms Project Hope, People to
People International, GlobalWarming.org, Contact Lancaster/24 Hour Suicide Hotline, Schreiber Pediatric
Center, and numerous others.
Stan J.
ADVANCED
Stan
Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUPMedia
Accounts
Valuation
Group
ReceivablesPage
Receivables
BiographyPage
Page
165
467
75
2 of 6523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday
Wednesday,
November
December
April 20,
29, 2016
30,
27,
In 2004 I embarked on our past endeavors in the music and entertainment industries with an emphasis
on assisting for the fair and equitable distribution of artists rights and royalties in the fight against
electronic piracy. We have attempted to assist in developing new business models to address the
convergence of physical and electronic mediums; as it displaces royalties and revenues for those
creating, promoting, and delivering a range of entertainment content via wireless networks.
In 2000 to 2002 I developed an array of marketing and communication tools for wholesalers of the
AIM Investment Group and managed several communication programs for several of the company
wholesalers throughout the United States and Costa Rica. We also began a Day Trading project that
lasted until 2004 with success.
In 1999 I developed a comprehensive business plan to develop the former Sprecher Brewery, known as
the Excelsior Building on E. King Street, in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. This plan was developed in
conjunction with the Comprehensive Economic Development Plan for the Revitalization of Downtown
Lancaster and the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center for the former Watt & Shand building.
In 1999 I contributed to the debate, research, and implementation of strategies to counter the effects
of the global Y2K threat to the worlds computer technologies. I attended the U.S. Sponsored Y2K
symposium and Conference in Washington, D.C. hosted by the Senate Y2K Subcommittee and Senator
William Bennett.
In 1998 I had began to administer the charity giving of Toms Project Hope, a non-profit organization
promoting education and awareness for mental illness and suicide prevention. We had provided funding
for the Mental Health Alliance of Lancaster County, Contact Lancaster (The 24/7 Suicide Prevention
Hotline), The Schreiber Pediatric Center, and other charitable organizations and faith based charities.
The video "Numbers Don't Lie" have been distributed to schools, non profit organizations, faith based
initiatives, and municipalities to provide educational support for the prevention of suicide and to bring
awareness to mental illness problems.
In 1996 I had done consulting for companies under KAL, Inc., during the time that I was controller of
Pflumm Contractors, Inc., I was retained by Gallo Rosso Restaurant and Bar to computerized their
accounting and records management from top to bottom. I had also provided consulting for the
computerization of accounting and payroll for Lancaster Container, Inc., of Washington Boro. I was
retained to evaluate and develop an action plan to migrate the Informations Technologies of the Jay
Group, formally of Ronks, PA, now relocated to a new $26 Million Dollar headquarters located in West
Hempfield Township of Lancaster County. The Jay Group had been using IBM mainframe technologies
hosted by the AS 400 computer and server. I was consulting on the merits of migrating to a PC based
real time networking system throughout the entire organization. Currently the Jay Group employees
some 500 employees with revenues in excess of $50 Million Dollars per year.
In 1993 I was retained by Pflumm Contractors, Inc., as controller, and was responsible for saving the
company from a potential bankruptcy. At that time, due to several unpaid contracts, the company was
facing extreme pressure from lenders and the bonding insurance company. We were responsible for
implementing computerized accounting, accounting and contract policies and procedures, human
resource policies and procedures, marketing strategies, performance measurement reporting, and
negotiate for the payment of unpaid contracts. The bonding company was especially problematic, since
it was the lifeline to continue work and bidding for public contracts. The Bank of Lancaster County
demanded a complete accounting of the operations in order to stave off a default on the notes and loans
it was holding. We essentially revamped the entire operation. Within 3 years, the company realized an
increase in profits of 3 to 4 times its previous years, and record revenues.
Stan J.
ADVANCED
Stan
Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUPMedia
Accounts
Valuation
Group
ReceivablesPage
Receivables
BiographyPage
Page
166
468
76
3 of 6523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday
Wednesday,
November
December
April 20,
29, 2016
30,
27,
In 1991 I was elected to People to People International and the Citizen Ambassador Program, which
was founded by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1956. The program was founded to To give
specialists from throughout the world greater opportunities to work together and effectively
communicate with peers, The Citizen Ambassador program administers face-to-face scientific, technical,
and professional exchanges throughout the world. In 1961, under President John F. Kennedy, the State
Department established a non-profit private foundation to administer the program. We were scheduled
to tour the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe to discuss printing and publishing technologies with
scientists and technicians around the world.
In 1990 I had worked on developing voice recognition systems for the governments technology think
tank - NIST (National Institute for Standards & Technology). I co-authored the article Escaping the Unix
Tar Pit with a scientist from NIST that was published in the magazine DISC, then one of the leading
publications for the CD-ROM industry. Today, most all call centers deploy that technology whenever you
call an 800 number, and voice recognition is prevalent in all types of applications involving
telecommunications.
In 1989 I had founded Advanced Media Group, Ltd., and was one of only 5 or 6 U.S. domestic
companies that had the capability to manufacture CD-ROM's. We did business with commercial
companies, government agencies, educational institutions, and foreign companies. I performed services
and contracts for the Department of Defense, NASA, National Institution of Standards & Technology
(NIST), Department of Defense, The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), and the
Defense Mapping Agency, Central Intelligence Agency, (CIA), IBM, Microsoft, AMP, Commodore
Computers, American Bankers Bond Buyers, and a host of others. I also was working with R.R,
Donnelly's Geo Systems, which was developing various interactive mapping technologies, which is now a
major asset of Map Quest. Map Quest is the premier provider of mapping software and applications for
the internet and is often used in delivering maps and directions for Fortune 500 companies. We had
arranged for High Industries to sell American Helix, the manufacturer of compact discs, to R.R. Donnelly.
We had brokered a deal and the executives from Donnellys Chicago headquarters flew to Lancaster to
discuss the deal and perform due diligence of the manufacturing facility located in the Greenfield
Industrial Park.
In 1987 Power Station Studios of New York and Tony Bongiovi retained me as executive producer
of a motion picture project. The theatrical and video release was to be delivered in a digital format; the
first of its kind. We had originated the marketing for the technology, and created the concept for the
Power Station Digital Movie System (PSDMS), which would follow the copyright and marketing formula
of the DOLBY technology trademark.
We had also created and developed marketing and patent research for the development and
commercialization of equipment that we intended to manufacture and market to the recording industry
featuring the digital technology. Sidel, Gonda, Goldhammer, and Abbot, P.C. of Philadelphia was the lead
patent law firm that We had retained for the project. Power Station Studios was the brainchild of Tony
Bongiovi, a leading engineering genius discovered by Motown when he was 15. Tony and Power Station
Studios was one of the leading recording studios in the country, and were responsible for developing Bon
Jovi, a cousin. Power Station Studios clients included; Bruce Springsteen, Diana Ross, Cyndi Lauper,
Talking Heads, Madonna, The Ramones, Steve Winwood, and many others. Tony and Power Station
Studios had produced the original Sound Track for the original Star Wars motion picture. It was
released for distribution and was the number one Sound Track recording of its time.
Tony Bongiovi was also active in working and researching different aerospace technologies. * We had
developed and authored a Joint Venture Proposal for SONY to partner with us in delivering the Digital
Movie and its related technologies to the marketplace. The venture was to include the commercialization
of technologies, which Tony Bongiovi had developed for the recording industry simultaneously with the
release of the Digital Movie.
Stan J.
ADVANCED
Stan
Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUPMedia
Accounts
Valuation
Group
ReceivablesPage
Receivables
BiographyPage
Page
167
469
77
4 of 6523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday
Wednesday,
November
December
April 20,
29, 2016
30,
27,
I also created the concept for the PSDMS trademark, which was to be the Trademark logo for the
technology, similar to the DOLBY sound systems trademark. The acronyms stand for the Power Station
Digital Movie System. Today, DVD is the mainstay for delivering digital movies on a portable medium, a
compact disc.
In 1987 I had a created and developed FMG Mortgage Banking, a company that was funded by a major
banking firm in Houston Texas. We had the capability to finance projects from $3 to $100 million dollars.
Our terms and rates were so attractive that we had quickly received solicitations from developers across
the country. We were also very attractive to companies that wanted to raise capital that include both
debt and equity. Through my company, FMG, we could raise equity funding through private placements,
and debt funding through FMG Mortgage Banking. We were retained by Gamillion Studios of Hollywood,
California to secure financing of their postproduction Film Studio that was looking to relocate to North
Carolina. We had secured refinancing packages for Norris Boyd of and the Olde Hickory and were in the
midst of replacing the current loan that was with Commonwealth National Bank. We had meetings and
discussions with Drew Anton of the Eden Resort, for refinancing a portion of his debt portfolio. We were
quickly seeking commitments for real estate deals from New York to California. We also had a number of
other prominent local developers seeking our competitive funding, including Owen Kugal, High
Industries, and the Marty Sponougle a partner of The Fisher Group (owner of the Rt. 30 Outlets). We
were constantly told that our financing packages were more competitive than local institutions.
In 1986 I had founded Financial Management Group, Ltd (FMG); a large financial services organization
comprised of a variety of professionals operating in one location. We had developed a stock purchase
program for where everyone had the opportunity for equity ownership in the new firm. FMG had
financial planners, investment managers, accountants, attorneys, realtors, liability insurance services,
tax preparers, and estate planners operating out of our corporate headquarters in Lancaster. In one
year, we had 24 people on staff, had approximately 12 offices in Pennsylvania, and
several satellite offices in other states. We had in excess of $50 million under management, and our
advisors were generating almost $4 million of commissions, which did not include the fees from the
other professionals. We had acquired our own Broker Dealer firm and were valued at about $3 to $4
million.
In 1985 I developed the Easter Regional Free Agent Camp, the first Free Agent Camp for the
Professional Football industry; which was videotaped for distribution to the teams scouting departments.
(See Washington Post page article of March 24, 1985) Current camps were dependant on the team
scouts to travel from state to state looking for recruits. We had developed a strategy of video taping the
camp and the distributing a copy, free of charge to the teams, to all of the scouting departments for
teams in all three leagues FL, CFL and WFL. My brother was signed at that camp by the Ottawa
Roughriders of the CFL, and went on to be a leading receiver while J.C. Watts was one of the leagues
most prominent quarterbacks. My brother also played 2 years with the Miami Dolphins while Dan Marino
was starting quarterback. We were a Certified Agent for the National Football League Players
Association. Gene Upshaw, the President of the NFLPA had given me some helpful hints for my camp,
while we were at a Conference for agents of the NFL. The Washington Post wrote a full-page article
about our camp and associated it with other camps that were questionable about their practices.
Actually, that was the very reason for our camp. We had attended many other camps around the
country that were not very well organized and attracted few if any scouts. We had about 60 participants,
with one player coming from as far away as Hawaii. We held the camp at Lancaster Catholic, with a
professional production company filming the entire camp, while I did the editing and produced the video.
The well respected and widely acclaimed professional football scout, Gil Brandt, of the Dallas Cowboys,
had given me support for my camp during some conversations We had with him and said he looked
forward to reviewing the tapes for any hopeful recruits.
Stan J.
ADVANCED
Stan
Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUPMedia
Accounts
Valuation
Group
ReceivablesPage
Receivables
BiographyPage
Page
168
470
78
5 of 6523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday
Wednesday,
November
December
April 20,
29, 2016
30,
27,
In 1985 I was elected Vice President of the Central Pennsylvania Chapter of the International
Association of Financial Planners, and helped build that chapter by increasing membership 3to 4 times.
We had personally retained the nationally acclaimed and nationally syndicated Financial Planner, Ms.
Alexandria Armstrong of Washington D.C.; to host a major fundraiser. More than 150 professionals
attended the dinner event that was held at the Eden Resort & Conference Center. Ms. Armstrong
discussed financial planning and how all of the professions needed to work together in order to be most
effective for their clients. We attracted a wide variety of professionals including; brokers, lawyers,
accountants, realtors, tax specialists, estate planners, bankers, and investment advisors. Today, it has
become evident that financial planning was the way of the future. In 1986 executives approached us
from Blue Ball National Bank to help them develop a Financial Planning department within their bank.
In 1984 I had helped to develop strategic planning for Sandy Weill, former President of Citi Group (the
largest banking entity in the U.S). We were one of several associates asked to help advise on the future
of Financial Planning and how it would impact the brokerage and the investment industry at large. Mr.
Weil was performing due diligence for the merger of American Express and IDS (Investors Diversified
Services). We were at that time a national leader in the company in delivering Fee Based Financial
Planning Services, which was a new concept in the investment community and mainstream investors.
That concept is now widely held by most investment advisers.
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
ACTIVE COURT CASES

J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of
Appeals - COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149;15-3400; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 15-03984; 14-02559; 05-2288; 06-4650
Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015
Stan J.
ADVANCED
Stan
Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUPMedia
Accounts
Valuation
Group
ReceivablesPage
Receivables
BiographyPage
Page
169
471
79
6 of 6523
169
221
79
Wednesday
Tuesday
Wednesday,
November
December
April 20,
29, 2016
30,
27,
Stan J. Caterbone
Surveillance,
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
November 30, 2016
James Comey, Director
FBI Headquarters
935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20535-0001
(202) 324-3000
Re:
PRO SE BILLINGS INVOICE Please See Attached

PLEASE REMIT IMMEDIATELY, PAST DUE
Dear Director Comey,
PRO SE BILLINGS
March 2007 to August 2007 $284,327.50
July 2015 to November 2016 $360,000.00
TOTALS
111 Court Cases

36 Court Cases
$584,327.50
147 Court Cases
Respectfully,
___________/S/____________
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
170 of 523
472
221
Letter Page 1 of 2
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
30, 2016
ACTIVE COURT CASES
J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re ALL
U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 16-6822 PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI re Case No. 16-1149
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-3400
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa
U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16-cv-1751 PETITION FOR HABEUS CORPUS
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Case No. 2016-462 Complaint against
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane
Superior Court of Pennsylvania Summary Appeal Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016, AMICUS for Kathleen
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Page
171
473
of 523
221
Letter
Page
2 of 2
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
30, 2016
Stan J. Caterbone
Surveillance,
1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-528-2200
November 29, 2016
PRO SE BILLINGS
March 2007 to August 2007
July 2015 to November 2016
$284,327.50
$360,000.00
111 Court Cases

36 Court Cases
TOTALS
$584,327.50
147 Court Cases

1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
717-669-2163
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Pro
Valuation
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page
172
474
1 of
of50
221
523
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
30, 2016
ACTIVE COURT CASES

ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Pro
Valuation
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page
173
475
2 of
of50
221
523
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
30, 2016
ACTIVE COURT CASES

ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Pro
Valuation
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page
174
476
3 of
of50
221
523
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
30, 2016
Advanced
Media Group
U.S. District
Court 16-4014
Pro Se Billings
Amount To August 31, 2007
Date
Name
AMG Chapter 11
3/1/2007 Bankruptcy
Line Description
Item Description
May 2005 Research Filing of Petition for Bankruptcy,
Russell Kraft, Nettleton & Fenefrock
Chapter 11 Hours Billed
May 23 2005 File for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
Protection in Federal Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania, Reading
June 21 2005 Notice of Appeal Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbone Regarding 6/13/2005 Order Dismissing
Case for Debtor's Failure to Timely File Required
Documents to
Chapter 11 Appeal Hours
Qty
Unit
Price
Debit
Amount
Credit
Amount
20
$125.00
$2,500.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$625.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
$125.00
$625.00
Jul 2005 Administration, Reporting and

Communication with Creditors and Accounts Payables
for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
Aug 2005 Administration, Reporting and

10
$125.00
$1,250.00
Sep 2005 Administration, Reporting and

10
$125.00
$1,250.00
Oct 2005 Administration, Reporting and

10
$125.00
$1,250.00
Nov 2005 Administration, Reporting and

10
$125.00
$1,250.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
Jun 2005 Administration, Reporting and

Jul 1 2005 In Reading Appellant Designation of
Contents For Inclusion in Record On Appeal, and
Findings of Fact Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone .
(Attachments: #
Dec 2005 Administration, Reporting and

Dec 15 2005 Amended Schedules F & G Filed by
Amended Matrix Stanley J. Caterbone ; Receipt
Number 20074028, Fee Amount $26.00. (P., Cathy)
(Entered: 12/16/2005)
$125.00
$375.00
Jan 2006 Administration, Reporting and

10
$125.00
$1,250.00
Feb 2006 Administration, Reporting and

10
$125.00
$1,250.00
Apr 2006 Administration, Reporting and

10
$125.00
$1,250.00
May 2006 Administration, Reporting and

10
$125.00
$1,250.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
Jun 2006 Administration, Reporting and

Jun 29 2006 Hearing Held - RE: Motion to Dismiss
Case, or Conversion of Case to Chapter 7 Filed by
United States Trustee (
Court Time Hours Billed
$150.00
$1,050.00
Jul 2006 Administration, Reporting and

10
$125.00
$1,250.00
Aug 2006 Administration, Reporting and

10
$125.00
$1,250.00
Sep 2006 Administration, Reporting and

10
$125.00
$1,250.00
10
$125.00
Jan 2007 Administration, Reporting and

AMG Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
6/17/2007
CATERBONE v. United States, et.al.,
Apr 30 2007 Notice of Appeal to Thrid Circuit from

Chapter 11 re Amend Filing Date Case No. 07-2150
May 10 2007 Application to procedd In Forma
Pauperis Filed
May 21 2007 Motion For Recusal of Judge Rendell
Filed
May 29 2007 Order Granted for In Forma Pauperis;
Proceed to 3 Judge Panel for Review to Continue
June 8 2007 Motion to Dismiss by Department of
Justice (Appellee) by J. Adams
$1,250.00
$25,800.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page
175
477
4
1 of
of44
50
221
523
$375.00
$1,750.00
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
Advanced
Media Group
U.S. District
Court 16-4014
Pro Se Billings
Date
Name
Line Description
June 2 2005 Order Granting Application To Pay Filing
Fees In Installments. (Related Doc # 4);
June 13 2005 Order Dismissing Case for Debtor's
Failure to Timely File Required Documents. (P.,
Cathy) (Entered: 06/13/2005)
June 21 2005 Summary of Schedules, Schedules A-J,
Statement of Financial Affairs Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbone . (Attachments: # J. Statement of
Financial Affai
06/21/2005 Summary of Schedules, Schedules A-J,
Statement of Financial Affairs Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbone . (Attachments: # J. Statement of
Financial Aff
07/01/2005 Appellant Designation of Contents For
Inclusion in Record On Appeal, and Findings of Fact
Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone . (Attachments: # I
Findi
09/21/2005 District Court Order entered within Civil
Action # 05-CV-3689 Notice of Appeal Filed by
Stanley J. Caterbone Regarding 6/13/2005 Order
Dismissing
10/05/2005 Final Order By District Court Judge Anita
B. Brody - RE: Notice of Appeal (CA-05-3689)
Regarding 6/13/2005 Order Dismissing Ca
11/08/2005 Notice of Hearing to Show Cause why
this case should
not be not be Dismissed for
Debtor's Failure to Timely Pay Filing Fees for Chapter
1
Item Description

Qty
Unit
Price
Debit
Amount
Credit
Amount
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$875.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$375.00

3
6
$125.00
$150.00
$375.00
$900.00
Jan 9 2006 File Order Entered that if a certificate of

service of the amended schedules or amended matrix
is not filed within 20 days from the date of this orde Chapter 11 Hours Billed
$125.00
$375.00
01/23/2006 Certificate of Service Filed by Stanley J.

Caterbone - RE: Amended Schedules and Response to
Creditor Status Order (related document(s)27). (P.,
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$375.00
25
$125.00
$3,125.00
$125.00
$500.00
12
$125.00
$1,500.00
$125.00
$500.00
$150.00
$900.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
11/16/2005 Meeting of Creditors . 341 (a) meeting

to be held on 12/15/2005 at 12:30 PM at 3cnfrm 3rd Floor Conference Room. Last day to oppose dis
11/29/2005 Drive to Reading to Final Installment
Payment. Receipt Number 20073978, Fee Amount
$839.00. (P., Cathy) (Entered: 11/29/2005) Drive to
Reading Co
General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Chapter 11 Case
12/15/2005 Response dated 12/14/2005 Filed by
Stanley J. Caterbone Regarding HEMAP Appeal
Hearing Request. (P., Cathy) (Entered: 12/16/2005)
Time For Court Appearance and Litigation
01/24/2006 Motion for Relief from Stay. Fee Amount

$150, Filed by Fulton Bank Represented by SHAWN
M. LONG (Counsel). Objections due by 2/8/2006. (A Chapter 11 Hours Billed
01/30/2006 Amended Schedule F (creditor added)
Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone ; Receipt Number
20074148, Fee Amount $26.00 (P., Cathy) (Entered:
01/31/2006)
01/30/2006 Advanced Media Group Income
Statements for the year 2005 Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbone . (Attachments: # !_ Continuation of
Reports) (P., Cathy)
Caterbone - RE: Amended Schedules (related
document(s)35). (P., Cathy) (Entered: 02/02/2006)
02/02/2006 Debtor's Response to Motion of Fulton
Bank for Relief From Stay ; Response and Exhibits
thereto Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone (related do
02/10/2006 Monthly Operating Report for Filing for
the month of January 2006 Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbone . (P., Cathy) (Entered: 02/10/2006)
02/21/2006 Hearing Held on 31 Motion for Relief
from Stay Filed by Fulton Bank Represented by
SHAWN M. LONG (Counsel). Matter Taken Under
Advisement. (S., B
02/23/2006 Order Granting Motion for Relief from
Stay Regarding Property 220 Stone Hill Road,
Conestoga, PA Filed by Fulton Bank Represented by
SHAWN M. LON
03/20/2006 Debtor Request for Hearing, and
Certificate of Service thereto Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbone . (P., Cathy) (Entered: 03/20/2006)
Chapter 11 Case
03/31/2006 Order DENYING Debtor's (Second)
Request for Hearing because nothing is pending
before this Court on which a hearing might be held,
(related d
04/10/2006 Request for Continuance of Chapter 11
Case Filed'by Stanley J. Caterbone . (P., Cathy)
(Entered: 04/10/2006)
04/10/2006 Order DENYING Debtor's Motion to Stay
All Proceedings (Request for Continuance) because
nothing is presently pending before this Court that
would
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page
176
478
5
2 of
of44
50
221
523
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
Advanced
Media Group
U.S. District
Court 16-4014
Pro Se Billings
Date
Name
Line Description
Item Description
05/03/2006 Order (copy) entered in District Court
within Appeal CV-06-1538 ; Ordered that the
Appellant's motion for continuance is Denied as Moot
(con
05/30/2006 05/30/2006 05/30/2006 Motion to
Convert Case to Chapter 7 . Fee Amount $15.00,
Motion to Dismiss Case Filed by United States Trustee
Represente

Qty
Unit
Price
Debit
Amount
Credit
Amount
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$250.00
$150.00
$900.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$125.00
11 Hours Billed
$125.00
$375.00
11 Hours Billed
$125.00
$125.00
11 Hours Billed
$125.00
$125.00
11 Hours Billed
$125.00
$125.00
11 Hours Billed
$125.00
$250.00
09/27/2006 Notice of Briefing Schedule issued by US

District Court - RE: Notice of Appeal Civil Action 064212 (related document(s)83). (P., Cathy)
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$375.00
02/09/2007 Letter Received from Debtor Stanley J.

Caterbone in response to memorandum regarding
Local Rule 9014-3. (P., Cathy) (Entered: 02/13/2007) Chapter 11 Hours Billed
$125.00
$250.00

Caterbone Regarding Documents sent to US Trustee's
Office. (P., Cathy) (Entered: 06/08/2006)
06/29/2006 Hearing Held - RE: Motion to Dismiss
Case, or Conversion of Case to Chapter 7 Filed by
United States Trustee (related document(s),60).
**MATTER T
07/10/2006 Debtor's Request for Hearing
Transcripts, Praecipe to Proceed in Forma Pauperis
Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone . (P., Cathy) (Entered:
07
07/17/2006 Final Order By District Court Judge Anita
B. Brody Regarding Debtor's Notice of Appeal (Civil
Action #06-1538) of Bankruptcy Order dated
2/23/200
07/18/2006 Debtor's Request (dated 7/14/2006) for
Hearing Transcripts, Praecipe to Proceed in Forma
Pauperis Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone . (P., Cathy)
(En
07/20/2006 Memorandum In Support of Motion to
Dismiss Filed by United States Trustee Dept of Justice
Dave P. Adams
08/03/2006 Hearing Set re Debtor's Request for
Hearing Transcripts, Praecipe to Proceed in Forma
Pauperis Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone (related
document 67
08/16/2006 Motion Debtor Request Continuance

Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone Represented by
Self(Counsel). (P., Cathy) (Entered: 08/16/2006)
Chapter
08/17/2006 Hearing Scheduled to provide court with
difinitive report status of Chapter 11 and to address
questions about the future Heaing Notice Never
Recieved
Chapter
Chapter 11 Case
Chapter
08/25/2006 DOCKETED IN ERROR: entered on main
case, should be on adversary- See Adversary 062236***Attach PDF Document: Copy of Notice of
Appeal
Chapter
08/31/Order Entered that the Bench Order Entered on
today's Record DENYING 67 Debtor's Request (dated
7/6/2006) for Hearing Transcripts, Praecipe to
Proceed IFP
Chapter
10/03/2006 Order Granting United States Trustee's

Motion to Dismiss Case, (related document(s)60). (P.,
10/19/2006 Notice of Appeal to District Court - RE:
Order entered 10/3/2006 Granting United States
Trustee's Motion to Dismiss Case ; Notice of Appeal,
and
01/18/2007 Motion for Debtor's Request (dated
1/13/2007) for Hearing Transcripts, Praecipe to
Proceed in Forma Pauperis Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbon
01/19/2007 Order DENYING Motion for Debtor's
(Second) Request for Hearing Transcripts, Praecipe to
Caterbone.
01/19/2007 Order DENYING Motion for Debtor's
(Second) Request for Hearing Transcripts, Praecipe to
Caterbone.
02/05/2007 Updated Creditor Matrix/Amendment to
List of Creditors (5 new names) Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbone (Neither Amended Schedules nor Certific
02/05/2007 Application to Waive Fee Filed by
Stanley J. Caterbone Represented by Self(Counsel).
(P., Cathy) (Entered: 02/05/2007)
02/05/2007 Motion to Reconsider Order DENYING
Motion for Debtor's (Second) Request for Hearing
Transcripts, Praecipe to Proceed in Forma Pauperis ;
M
02/07/2007 Order DENYING Debtor's Motion to
Reconsider Order dated 1/19/2007 and DENYING
Debtor's Application to Waive Fee. (related
document(s)105, 1
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page
177
479
6
3 of
of44
50
221
523
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
Advanced
Media Group
U.S. District
Court 16-4014
Pro Se Billings
Date
Name
Line Description
Item Description
02/20/2007 Notice of Appeal to District Court of
Order entered 2/7/2007 DENYING Debtor's Motion to
Reconsider Order DENYING Debtor's Application to
Wa
02/26/2007 Corrective Entry - RE: Notice of Appeal
of Order DENYING Debtor's Motion to Reconsider
Order and Debtor's Application to Waive Fee Filed by
Stanl
3/16/2007 Federal Habeau Corpus

Nov 20, 2006 - General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Civil Appeal Case Harbeas Corpus
filed from Lancaster County Prison on November 17,
2006
January 19, 2007 - ADDENDUM to 2241 Habeas
Corpus Petition by STANLEY J. CATERBONE.
Certificate of Service, (gs) (Entered: 01/22/2007)
April 17, 2007 - ORDER THAT THE CLERK SHALL
PROMPTLY FURNISH PETITIONER WITH THE IN
FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION FORM AND
PETITIONER SHALL EITHER COMPLETE AND RET
May 31, 2007 - EXHIBIT to 28 U.S.C. Section 2241

Habeas Corpus Petition by STANLEY J. CATERBONE.
Certificate of Service (gs) (Entered: 06/01/2007)
June 4, 2007 - EXHIBIT to U.S.C. Sec. 2241 Habeas
Copus Petition by STANLEY J. CATERBONE. (gs)
(Entered: 06/04/2007)
Federal Habeau Corpus
Aug 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done
Caterbone v. Penn DOT On Pro Se Civil Case
Sep 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done
On Pro Se Civil Case
Caterbone v. Penn DOT
Caterbone v.
Aug 2 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done
Caterbone,Michael
On Pro Se Civil Case Filed Complaint
Aug 24 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Civil Case Filed Default Notice
Caterbone v. Caterbone,Michael
Jul 14 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done
On Pro Se Civil Case Filed Complaint & In Forma
Caterbone v. Penn DOT Pauperis Denied by Georgelis
Aug 25 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Civil Case Refiled In Forma Pauperis Granted
by Cullen
Sep 5 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done
On Pro Se Civil Appeal Case Filed Appeal to Superior
Court of Pennsylvania
Civil Appeal Case Transfered from Superior Court to
Commonwealth Court of Common Pleas
Jul 26 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done
Caterbone v. PP&L
On Pro Se Civil Case Filed Complaint with Advanced
Media Group
Electric
10 Aug 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Chapter 11 Case Transfered to
Chapter 11 Case by PP&L
Caterbone v. PP&L Electric
Caterbone v. Southern
Regional
Unit
Price
Debit
Amount
Credit
Amount
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$1,000.00
$125.00
$125.00
$23,825.00
Hours Billed For Civil

Appeals
15
$125.00
$1,875.00

Appeals
$125.00
$375.00

Appeals
$125.00
$125.00

Appeals
$125.00
$375.00

Appeals
$125.00
$250.00
$3,000.00
Civil Litigation Hours

Billed
Billed
10
$125.00
$125.00
$1,250.00
$1,000.00
$2,250.00

Billed
Billed
10
$125.00
$125.00
$1,250.00
$250.00
$1,500.00

Billed
15
$125.00
$1,875.00

Billed
$125.00
$625.00

Appeals
$125.00
$1,000.00

Appeals
$125.00
$250.00
$3,750.00

Billed
$125.00
$125.00
$1,000.00
$125.00
$1,125.00
Feb 2005 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done

On Pro Se Civil Case Meetings & Communications with Civil Litigation Hours
Chief of Southern Regional Police Fiorill
Billed
Mar 2005 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done
On Pro Se Civil Case Meetings & Communications with
Chief of Southern Regional Police Fiorill
Apr 4 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done
On Pro Se Civil Case Prepared Complaint and Email to
Don Totaro, Lancaster County DA
Apr 11 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Civil Case Filed Complaint
Apr 28 2006 Ammend Complaint General Hours Billed
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Case
Qty
03/06/2007 Order Supplementing Order of February

7, 2007, pursuant to Local Bankruptcy Rule 8001-1
(c)(related document(s)K)6). (B., Keith) (Entere
03/20/2007 District Court Acknowledgement of
receiving Bankruptcy Appeal (CA-07-1093) Signed by
Deputy Clerk Steve Tomas - RE: Notice of Appeal to
District
05/18/2007 Notice of Change of Address Filed by
Stanley J. Caterbone . (P.,Cathy) (Entered:
05/18/2007) 05/18/2007 Operating Report/Balance
05/18/2007 Operating port/Balance Sheet
5/31/2007, Income Statement for 5 months ending
5/31/2007, Aged Receivables as of 5/31/2007 Filed
by Stanley

Billed
Billed
Billed
Billed
15
$125.00
$1,875.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$500.00
20
$125.00
$2,500.00
$125.00
$500.00
May 15 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work

Done On Pro Se Civil Case Certificate of Service
Personal Delivery to William Cambell of Quarryville

Billed
$125.00
$625.00
Jun 10 2006 Motion for Continuance General Hours

Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Case

Billed
$125.00
$375.00
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page
178
480
7
4 of
of44
50
221
523
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
Advanced
Media Group
U.S. District
Court 16-4014
Pro Se Billings
Date
Name
Line Description
Item Description
Jun 15 2006 Reponsive Brief to Preliminary Objections
General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Litigation Hours
Civil Case
Billed
Jul 25 2006 Appealed to Superior Court of
Pennsylvania General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Civil Appeal Case
Appeals
Aug 09 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas
Time For Court Appearance and Litigation Shawn
Long Appeared at Defendants Table before Court,
walked out
Oct 30 2006 Filed Amended Complaint from Bausman
Post Office, General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Appeals
Nov 7 2006 Filed for Continuance from Lancaster
County Prison General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Civil Case
Billed
Caterbone v. Southern Regional
Sep 1 2006 Complaint & In Forma Pauperis Filed
Caterbone v. Millersville General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Litigation Hours
Poli
Civil Case IFP Granted Judge Ashworth
Billed
Mar 26 2007 File Response to Preliminary Objections
to Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas General
Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil
Billed
Case
Caterbone v. Millersville Poli
Sep 11 2006 Filed Complaint & In Forma Pauperis
Caterbone v. Benjamin General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Litigation Hours
Roda
Civil Case IFP Denied by Judge Reinaker
Billed
Caterbone v.
Harleysville et
Caterbone v. Grassell,
Thomas
Caterbone v. Lancaster
General
Caterbone v.
Pflumm,Mike et al
Common of PA v. S.
3/17/2007 Caterbone
3/18/2007
Sep 14 2006 Second In Forma Pauperis Application

Filed & Approved by Judge Joseph Madenspacher
Caterbone v. Benjamin Roda
Aug 1 2006 Complaint & Informa Pauperis Filed with
Advanced Media Group - General Hours Billed For
Legal Work Done On Pro Se Civil Case, IFP Granted
by Georgeli
Aug 24 2006 Important Notice of Default Filed General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Case
Sep 27 2006 Filed Reply to Preliminary Objections General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Case
Oct 23 Filed Brief in Support of Arbitration - General
Case
Nov 7 2006 Filed Motion for 60 Day Continuance General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Case

Billed
Mar 7 2007 Filed Amended Complaint - General Hours

Caterbone v. Harleysville et
Apr 11 2006 Filed Complaint - General Hours Billed
Jun 6 2006 Filed Important Notice of Default General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Case
Caterbone v. Grassell, Thomas
Apr 10 2006 Filed Complaint, walked to Courthouse
directly after discharge from Hospital - General Hours
Apr 28 2006 Filed Amended Complaint - General
Case
Caterbone v. Lancaster General
May 24 2006 Filed Complaint & In Forma Pauperis
Application - General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Civil Case IFP Denied by Judge
Reinaker
Caterbone v. Pflumm,Mike et al
2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Criminal Case Downtown Lancaster Parking
Meter Violation MDJ Simms
2006 Time For Court Appearance and Litigation For
Parking Meter Violation
Common of PA v. S. Caterbone
Aug 2006 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done
On Pro Se Criminal Case Downtown Lancaster Parking
Meter Violation MDJ Simms
Oct 5 2006 Time For Court Appearance and Litigation
MDJ Simms Parking Meter Violation
May 10 2005 General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Case 18$2709$$A3
Harassment w/Tim Decker Killing of Cat SRPD
Humane Legue Witness
Sep 28 2005 General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case Notice of
Appeal Stolen From Mail, Never Appeared For Trial,
Judge Allison
Fines $442.00 Paid General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case
Jan 09 2007 General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case Filed Nunc Pro
Tunc, Denied by Reainaker

Qty
Unit
Price
Debit
Amount
Credit
Amount
12
$125.00
$1,500.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
$150.00
$600.00
12
$125.00
$1,500.00
$125.00
$250.00
$12,100.00
15
$125.00
20
$125.00
$1,875.00
$2,500.00
$4,375.00
$125.00
$125.00
$1,000.00
$500.00
$1,500.00

Billed
20
$125.00
$2,500.00

Billed
$125.00
$375.00

Billed
$125.00
$875.00

Billed
$125.00
$625.00

Billed
$125.00
$250.00

Billed
$125.00
$875.00
$5,500.00

Billed
15
$125.00

Billed
$125.00
$1,875.00
$500.00
$2,375.00

Billed
25
$125.00

Billed
$125.00
$3,125.00
$1,000.00
$4,125.00

Billed
$125.00
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
Hours Billed For Criminal

Case
$125.00
$150.00
$625.00
$450.00
$1,075.00

Case
$125.00
$150.00
$625.00
$450.00
$1,075.00

Case
Hours Billed Criminal
Appeal
Appeal
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$250.00
$1,875.00

Appeal
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page
179
481
8
5 of
of44
50
221
523
$125.00
$250.00
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
Advanced
Media Group
U.S. District
Court 16-4014
Pro Se Billings
Date
Name
Line Description
Jan 19 2007 General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case Refiled, Denied
Again
Jul 5 2006 PrelimiHearing General Hours Billed For
Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Case MDJ
Hamilton, Fire M. Bomberger, Public Defender, MDJ
Hamilton Guilty
Oct 12 2006 Pretrial Conference Case Continued
Judge Allison General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Case $75$3733$$A M2
Nov 09 2006 Pretrial Conference Case Continued
Judge Allison General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Case From Lanc Co Prison
Dec 14 2006 Call of the Trial List Continued Judge
Ashworth (Cullen) General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Case From Lanc Co
Prison
Jan 22 2007 Call of the Trial List Scheduled for Trial
Judge Farina (Cullen) General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Case Janice Longer
Appo
Feb 23 2006 Complaint Filed to Lancaster County Bar
v. Janice Longer General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Case
Feb 26 Call of the Trial List Scheduled for Trial
Criminal Case
Feb 28 2006 Filed Response to Longer Petition to
Withdraw From Case General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Case
Mar 1 2007 General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done
On Pro Se Criminal Case Meeting with Janice Longer
To Prepare
Mar 4 2007 Trial Court Judge Cullen Continued Case
to April Court ScheduleTime For Court Appearance
and Litigation
Mar 4 2007 File Supreme Court Diciplinary Complaint
v. Janice Longer General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Mar 22 2007 Research & Review Pa Consolodated
Statutes Annotated at Law Library General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Case
Mar 26 Letter to Janice Longer & Review Motion to
Dismiss QuashGeneral Hours Billed For Legal Work
Dec 5 2005 Preliminary Hearing Judge Reuter,
Bezzard had to Refile or Dismiss General Hours Billed
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Case East
Lampeter Twp
May 18 2006 Lancaster County DA Office Refile
Charges General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Criminal Case 4 Charges-Harras Dis
Ord,Theft,Harrasment
Jun 23 2006 Meeting with Matt Bomberger, Public
Defender General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done
On Pro Se Criminal Case
Jul 26 2006 Fromal Arraignment Lanaster County
Court of Common PleasTime For Court Appearance
and Litigation
Jul 26 2006 File In Forma Pauperis Granted General
Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal
Case
Aug 2 2006 File Motion Bill of Particulars Discovery
Criminal Case
Sep 14 2006 Pretrial Conference Judge AllisonTime
For Court Appearance and Litigation
Oct 20 2006 Call of the Trial List Judge Farina Time
For Court Appearance and Litigation
Nov 27 2006 Call of the Trial List Judge FarinaTime
For Court Appearance and Litigation From Lancaster
County Prison
Nov to Dec 2006 Research Billed For Case From
Lancaster County Prison Law Library
Dec 4 2006 Trial Judge Farina Sent to 1250 Fremont
& 220 Stone Hill Rd to get files Time For Court
Appearance and Litigation Dismiss Harassment,
Change to Summa
Dec 5 2007 Trial Time For Court Appearance and
Litigation Guilty Harrasment & Disorderly Conduct,
Not Guilty Thef of Service
Dec 2007 Filed Appeals & Motions General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal
Case From Lancaster County Prison
Jan 4 2007 Notict of Appeal to Superior Court Case
No. MDA 125 General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case
Jan 26 2007 Meet with Court Reporters Office to Get
Electronic Version of Transcript & ReGeneral Hours
Case
Item Description
Appeal

Qty
2
Unit
Price
Debit
Amount
$125.00
Credit
Amount
$250.00
$500.00
Case
12
$125.00
$1,500.00
$150.00
$600.00
$150.00
$600.00
$150.00
$600.00

4
4
$150.00
$150.00
$600.00
$600.00

Case
$125.00
$625.00
$150.00
$600.00

Case
$125.00
$750.00

Case
$125.00
$625.00

Case
$125.00
$625.00

Case
$125.00
$625.00

Case
$125.00
$375.00

Case
2
0.1
$125.00
$150.00
$250.00
$15.00
$8,990.00

Case
10
$125.00
$1,250.00

Case
2
10
$125.00
$150.00
$250.00
$1,500.00

Case
$125.00
$500.00
$150.00
$600.00

Case
$125.00
$250.00

Case
$125.00
$500.00
$150.00
$600.00
$150.00
$750.00
$150.00
$750.00
Research Hours Billed
$75.00
$525.00
$150.00
$1,050.00
$150.00
$750.00

Appeal
$125.00
$750.00

Appeal
$125.00
$500.00

Appeal
$125.00
$375.00
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page
180
482
9
6 of
of44
50
221
523
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
Advanced
Media Group
U.S. District
Court 16-4014
Pro Se Billings
Date
Name
Common of PA v S.
Caterbone
Line Description
Feb 7 2007 Meet with Andrew Wagner of Court
Collections Office for Payment of Fines and Costs and
Remove Payment Due
Feb 23 2007 Meet with Andrew Wagner of Court
Collections to Have Payment Due Removed General
Appeal Case
Aug 2006 Filed U.S. Post Office Correspondence &
Complaint to SRPDTime For Court Appearance and
Litigation
Oct 30 2007 Plead Not Guilty to MDJ Eckert Picked Up
by Constables General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Nov 14 2006 File Habeus Corpus to U.S. District Court
of Eastern District of PA General Hours Billed For
Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case
Lanc Pri
Dec 2006 Research Billed For Case From Lancaster
County Prison Law Library
Dec 8 2006 Filed Writ of Mandamus From Lancaster
County PrisonGeneral Hours Billed For Legal Work
Item Description
Qty
Unit
Price

Appeal
$125.00

Appeal
$125.00
Debit
Amount
Credit
Amount
$500.00
$250.00
$11,650.00
10
$150.00
$1,500.00

Case
$125.00
$625.00

Appeal
$125.00
$875.00
$75.00
$375.00

Case
$125.00
$1,000.00
Jan 4 2007 Filed Motion for Continuance/Change

Venue General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Hours Billed For Criminal
Pro Se Criminal Case Moved From Eckert to Stotlzfus Case
$125.00
$375.00
Jan 18 2007 Trial MDJ StoltzfusTime For Court

Appearance and Litigation Guilty Harr, Dis Con, Obs,
Dismiss DUSus Fin Responsi Fine $954 Joe Caterbone Court Time Hours Billed
$150.00
$900.00
$125.00
Jan 25 2007 Filed Trial De Novo Appeal to Lancaster

County Court of Common Pleas General Hours Billed Hours Billed Criminal
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case Appeal
Common of PA v S. Caterbone
Aug 15 2006 Hearing MDJ Commins Robert M. Fedor
Criminal Case 2 Girls Walking Guilty Fine $315.66
Dec 15 2006 Summary Appeal Trial Judge Perezous
Found Guilty ?? April 2 Day of Daylight Person Broke
Into 220 Stone Hill Road, Mike on Cell Phone, Kennet
SPoli
Jul 14 2006 Hearing MDJ Hamilton General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Case
Fines $367.50
Jul 25 2006 Notice of Summary Appeal to Court of
Common PleasGeneral Hours Billed For Legal Work
Nov 14 2006 Filed Motion for Continuance From
Lancaster County PrisonJudge Cullen Denied General
Appeal Case
Dec 2006 Lancaster County Prison Law Library
Research Billed For Case
Dec 5 2006 Trial Judge Perezous Granted Motion For
Continuance Time For Court Appearance and
Litigation
Dec 22 2006 Motion for Transcripts Filed from
Lancaster County Prison General Hours Billed For
Jan 21 2007 Filed Motion For Continuance Granted
Judge Perezous General Hours Billed For Legal Work
Dec 22 2007 Filed Writ of Mandamus v. MDJ Eckert
From Lancaster County Prison General Hours Billed
For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Case
3/20/2007

Case
$125.00

Appeal
$125.00
$625.00
$375.00
$1,000.00

Case
$125.00
$1,000.00

Appeal
$125.00
$500.00

Appeal
$125.00
$375.00
$75.00
$375.00
$150.00
$600.00

Appeal
$125.00
$250.00

Appeal
$125.00
$500.00
$3,600.00

Case
Dec 22 2007 Filed Writ of Mandamus v. MDJ Commins

From Lancaster County Prison General Hours Billed
Hours Billed
Case
Jan 09 2007 Filed Motion for Change of Venue Deinied
Judge Reinaker General Hours Billed For Legal Work Hours Billed
Case
Jan 11 2007 Motion for Continance Filed Denied Judge
Hours Billed
Reinaker General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done
Case
Jan 17 2007 Motion for Reconsideration Filed Denied
Judge Reinaker General Hours Billed For Legal Work Hours Billed
Case
Jan 19 2007 Filed Motion to Proceed In Forma
Pauperis General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done
Hours Billed
Case
Jan 12 2007 File Change of Venue/ Continuance
MDEckert Citations Denied by Judge Cullen General
Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Hours Billed
Appeal Case
Appeal
Jan 05 2007 Filed Application to File Nunc Pro Tunc
for MDJ Simms Citations General Hours Billed For
$625.00
$6,275.00
For Criminal
For Criminal
For Criminal
For Criminal
$125.00
$750.00
$125.00
$750.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$500.00
$125.00
$500.00
$2,875.00
For Criminal
$125.00
$250.00
$250.00
Criminal

Appeal
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page
Page
181
483
10
7 of
of44
221
523
50
$125.00
$500.00
$500.00
$125.00
$500.00
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
Advanced
Media Group
U.S. District
Court 16-4014
Pro Se Billings
Date
Name
Line Description
Jan 05 2007 Filed Application to File In Forma
Pauperis for MDJ Simms Citations General Hours
Case
Item Description

Appeal

Appeal
Common of PA v S.
3/22/2007 Caterbone
Unit
Price
Debit
Amount
$500.00
$125.00
Credit
Amount
$500.00
$125.00
$500.00
$500.00

Appeal
$125.00
$250.00
$250.00
July 15, 2005 - Certificate of Appeal of STANLEY

CATERBONE from the order of Bankruptcy Judge
Thomas M. Twardowski. (tj, ) (Entered: 07/18/2005) Chapter 11 Appeal Hours
July 15, 2005 - Briefing Schedule 7/18/05 Entered
and copies mailed, (tj, ) (Entered: 07/18/2005)
July 28, 2005 - BRIEF TO ORDER TO DISMISS ON
6/13/05 by STANLEY CATERBONE. (ami, ) (Entered:
07/29/2005)
September 23, 2005 - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE BY
OCTOBER 3, 2005, WHY IN LIGHT OF DEBTORAPPELLANT'S NOTICE OF APPEAL (BKY. DOCKET #12)
AND BRIEF (DOCKET #3), THIS C
October 3, 2005 - RESPONSE TO THE ORDER TO
SHOW CAUSE WHY THE DEBTOR'S BANKRUPTCY
CASE SHOULD NOT BE REINSTATED by UNITED
STATES TRUSTEE, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
October 6, 2005 - ORDER THAT THIS CASE IS
REINSTATED IN THE U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR
THE EASTERN DISTRICT PROVIDED THAT DEBTORAPPELLANT COMPLY WITH THE RULES
November 7, 2005 - Original Bankruptcy Record
returned to the Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania, (afm, ) (Entered: 1
1/08/2005)
November 14, 2005 - Letter from U.S. BANKRUPTCY
COURT re: received original record on 11/10/05.
(afm, ) (Entered: 11/14/2005)
Chapter 11 Dismissal Appeal
May 15 2006 File Appeal to Automatic Stay Order of
Judge Fehling to Judge Anita Brody General Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Hours Billed Criminal
Fulton Auto Stay Appeal Case
Appeal
Fulton Auto Stay Appeal
Sept 18, 2006 - Certificate of Appeal of STANLEY J.
CATERBONE, ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP from the
order of Bankruptcy Judge Richard E. Fehling. (tj,)
Chapter 11 Amend
Dismissal
(Entered: 09/18
Appeals
October 10, 2007 - Certificate of Appeal of STANLEY
J. CATERBONE, ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP from the
order of Bankruptcy Judge Richard E. Fehling. (tj,)
(Entered: 09
Appeals
October 17, 2007 - Brief in Opposition re 3
Appellant's Brief by PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES.
(HENRY, MICHAEL) Modified on 10/18/2006 (np).
(Entered: 10/17/2006)
Appeals
November 15, 2007 - MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE.(gs) Additional
attachment(s) added on 12/13/2006 (mo,). (Entered: Hours Billed For Civil
11/16/2006) fro
Appeals
General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Hours Billed For Civil
Civil Appeal Case
Appeals
February 7, 2007 - MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
FILED BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO
SE,CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.(ac, ) (Entered:
02/09/2007)
Appeals
February 21, 2007 - ORDER that APPELLANT STANLEY
J. CATERBONE'S MOTION FOR A CONTINUANCE IS
GRANTED. APPELLANT MAY FILE A REPLY BRIEF IN
THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CAS
Appeals
Chapter 11 Amend Dismissal

Jan 4 2007 Filed Notice of Appeal to Superior Court
Filed at Lancaster County Clerk of CoGeneral Hours
Case
Jan 11 2007 Filed Motion For Continuance Granted
Criminal Appeal Case
Feb 12 2997 Filed Concise Statement of Matters
Complainted on Appeal General Hours Billed For Legal
Qty
$500.00
Chapter 11 Dismissal
Appeal
April 13, 2007 - MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE FILED

BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE. (SEE 05-2288,
PAPER NO. 50).(ac, ) (Entered: 04/13/2007)
Civil Appeal Case

Appeals
Appeals
Appeals
$125.00
$500.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$1,000.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$375.00
$3,125.00
20
$125.00
$2,500.00
$2,500.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$625.00
1.5
$125.00
$187.50
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$375.00
$3,312.50

Appeal
$125.00
$375.00

Appeal
$125.00
$375.00

Appeal
12
$125.00
$1,500.00
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page
Page
182
484
11
8 of
of44
221
523
50
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
Advanced
Media Group
U.S. District
Court 16-4014
Pro Se Billings
Date
Name
Common of PA v. S.
Caterbone
Line Description
Item Description
Mar 27 2007 Meeting with Lancaster County Clerk of
Courts Review & Correct Index of RecorGeneral Hours
Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal Hours Billed Criminal
Case
Appeal
Jun 28 2006 Hearing Preparation General Hours Billed
Jun 28 2007 Hearing at 1281 S 28th St. Harrisburg
Guilty MDJ Smith Time For Court Appearance and
Litigation
Oct ?? 2006 Phone Call & Letter For Payment of Fine
& Costs General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Criminal Case
Jan 1 2007 Letter to MDJ Smith Re Payment of Fines
Jan 15 2007 Filed Application For Leave Nunc Pro
TuncGeneral Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On Pro
Se Criminal Appeal Case
Feb 15 2007 Filed In Forma Pauperis In Dauphin
County Court of Common Pleas Granted General
Appeal Case
Mar 8 2007 Filed Notice of Appeal to Superior Court in
Dauphin County Court MDA 435-2007 General Hours
Case
Mar 25 2007 Filed Docketing Statement to Superior

Court of Pennsylvania General Hours Billed For Legal
Mar 27 2007 File Response to Fulton Bank Motion to
Fulton Bank v
Dismiss Case General Hours Billed For Legal Work
3/28/2007 Caterbone, Stan
Fulton Bank v Caterbone, Stan
110/20/2006 - File Federal False Claims Act, No
Complaint Copy Satute FMG, AMG, Global, Radio
Science Laboratories, Power Productions v. ISC,
Federal False Claims Act Attorney General,
11/16/2006 - MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma
pauperis filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE.(tj, )
(Entered: 10/23/2006)
11/16/2006 - ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS
GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THIS
CASE IS DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO S
COMPLAINT AGAINST ATTORNEY GENERAL,
INTERNATIONAL SIGNAL & CONTROL, PLC FILED BY
STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE, ADVANCED MEDIA
GROUP, LTD., ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP,
02/07/2007 - MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE FILED BY
STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE,CERTIFICATE OF
SERVICE.(ac, ) (Entered: 02/09/2007)
Mar 16 2007 Letter to U.S. Senator Arlen Specter
Regarding Obstruciton of Justice General Hours Billed
Mar 12 2007 Meet Lisa Owings staffer on Judiciary
Comitte from Senator Specter at Chamber Building
Civil Case
Mar 13 2007 Letter to Lisa Owings of Senator Specter
Office General Hours Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Civil Case
Pro Se Civil Case
Pro Se Civil Case
03/23/2007 - ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFF SHALL
SUBMIT A COPY OF HIS MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
BY 4/6/07. SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN
ON 3/22/07. 3/23/07 ENTERE
Common of PA v S.
Caterbone

Qty
Unit
Price
Debit
Amount
$125.00
Credit
Amount
$375.00
$2,625.00

Case
$125.00
$500.00
$150.00
$750.00

Case
$125.00
$375.00

Appeal
$125.00
$250.00

Appeal
$125.00
$500.00

Appeal
$125.00
$375.00

Appeal
$125.00
$500.00
$3,250.00

Appeal
$125.00
$500.00
$500.00

Appeals
$125.00
$375.00
$375.00

Billed
$125.00
$750.00

Billed
$125.00
$375.00

Billed
$125.00
$125.00

Billed
$125.00
$125.00

Billed
$125.00
$125.00

Billed
$125.00
$250.00

Billed
$125.00
$250.00

Billed
$125.00
$250.00

Billed
$125.00
$375.00

Billed
$125.00
$125.00

Billed
$125.00
$125.00
Mar 24 2007 Letter to Senator Specter General Hours Civil Litigation Hours
Billed
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00

Billed
$125.00
$125.00

Billed
$125.00
$125.00

Billed
$125.00
04/05/2007 - ORDER MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE IS

DENIED AS MOOT. ON NOVEMBER 16, 2006, THE
COURT DISMISSED THE CASE FOR FAILURE TO
STATE A CLAIM PURUSUANT TO 28
Billed
04/13/2007 - MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE FILED BY
STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE. (SEE 05-2288,
PAPER NO. 50).(ac, ) (Entered:
Billed
04/23/2007 - ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR
CONTINUANCE IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY
JUDGE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 04/16/07.04/16/07
ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED
04/26/2007 - ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST
FOR AN EX PARTE MEETING IS DENIED. SIGNED BY
JUDGE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 04/25/07.
05/05/2007 - ADDENDUM TO COMPLAINT BY
STANLEY J. CATERBONE., PRO SE.(ac,) (Entered:
05/07/2007)
Federal False Claims Act
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page
Page
183
485
12
9 of
of44
221
523
50
$250.00
$3,875.00
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
Advanced
Media Group
U.S. District
Court 16-4014
Pro Se Billings
Date
Name
Line Description
October 18, 2006 - MOTION for Leave to Proceed in

Caterbone v. Wenger et forma pauperis filed by STANLEY J.
6/1/2007 al
CATERBONE.AFFIDAVIT.(ks,) (Entered: 10/19/2006)
October 18, 2006 - Filed Civil Action re Obstruction of
Justice and RICO
November 17, 2006 - ORDER THAT MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS
GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF
SHALL AMEND HIS COMPLAINT SO AS TO
November 17, 2006 - ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S
MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE IS GRANTED. THE
CLERK OF COURT MARK THIS" ACTION CLOSED FOR
STATISTICAL PURPOSES AND PLACE THE
November 17, 2006 - Complaint against
DEFENDANTS MAYNARD HAMILTON, JR, DENISE
COMMINS, RICHARD H. SIMMS, STEVEN MYLIN,
WILLIAM G. REUTER, MICHAEL SMITH, RONALD
January 19,2007 - ORDER THAT THE ABOVECAPTIONED CASE SHALL REMAIN IN CIVIL
SUSPENSE UNTIL 4/19/07. SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY
A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 1/19/07. 1/19/07 ENTER
April 3, 2007 - ADDENDUM TO COMPLAINT filed by
STANLY J. CATERBONE. Cert, of Service. (PRO SE)
(pr, ) (Entered: 04/03/2007)
April 13, 2007 - STANLY J. CATERBONE'S MOTION
FOR CONTINUANCE (#50 in 06-cv-4154).(fdc)
(Entered: 04/13/2007)
April 16, 2007 - ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION
FOR CONTINUANCE IS GRANTED. THIS CASE SHALL
REMAIN IN CIVIL SUSPSENSE UNTIL 6/19/07.
SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A. MCLA
April 26, 2007 - ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFF'S
REQUEST FOR AN EX PARTE MEETING IS DENIED.
SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON
4/25/07. 4/26/07 ENTERED AND COPIES
May 7, 2007 - Addendum to Complaint by STANLY J.
CATERBONE (#1 1 in 06-CV-4154). (fdc) (Entered:
05/07/2007)
June 18, 2007 - Motion For Continuance
June 25, 2007 - Motion For Continuance Granted,
Provide Status by August 31, 2007
Caterbone v. Wenger et al
Appeal Order Amend
2288 Compl
Chapter 11 PP&L
Dismissal Appe
September 6, 2007 - CIVIL CASE DOCKETED Notice

filed by Stanley J. Caterbone. RECORD, received, (clc
September 8, 2007 - LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT
advising appeal has been listed for possible dismissal,
(zm)
September 18, 2007 - APPEARANCE from Attorney
Christopher S. Underhill on behalf of Appellee
Manheim Twp Pol, filed, (clc)
Stephanie Carfley on behalf of Appellee Fulton Bank,
filed, (clc)
September 18, 2007 - DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on
behalf of Appellee Fulton Bank, filed, (clc)
September 19, 2006 - FOLLOW UP LETTER to Robert
W. Hallinger, Walter H. Swayze, Patricia Baxter,
George M. Gowen and Stuart A. Weiss requesting the
following do
William H. Howard on behalf of Appellee Avalon Pol
Dept, filed. (Iwc)
William H. Howard on behalf of Appellee Avalon Pol
Dept, filed. (Iwc)
September 29, 2006 - DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on
behalf of Appellee Comm Natl Bank, filed, (clc)
October 2, 2006 - APPEARANCE from Attorney Robert
W. Hallinger on behalf of Appellee Lancaster Cty
Prison, filed, (clc)
October 11, 2006 - RESPONSE to Legal Division letter
for possible dismissal, on behalf of Appellee Manheim
Twp Pol, filed. Certificate of Service dated 10/6/06
December 1, 2006 - Notice received from district
court that IFF has been granted to Stanley J.
Caterbone . (clc)
April 30, 2007 - Document filed by Appellant titled
"Addendum to Appeal, filed, (clc)
Appeal Order Amend 2288 Compl
September 1, 2007 - Notice of Appeal to U.S. District
Court Anita Brody
September 10, 2007 - Judge Fehling Memorandum
and Opinion Filed
November 27, 2007 - PP&L Motion To Dismiss to
Judge Anita Brody
May 31, 2007 - Judge Anita Brody Reply Letter to M
Henry PP&L Attorney
May 31, 2007 - Appellant Response to Appellee
Motion to Dismiss
June 18, 2007 - Judge Anita Brody ORDER Denial,
Move to Dissmiss Appeal File Appeal to Third Circuit
within 60 days
Item Description
Billed
Billed

Qty
Unit
Price
Debit
Amount
Credit
Amount
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$1,000.00

Billed
$125.00
$250.00

Billed
$125.00
$125.00

Billed
$125.00
$125.00

Billed
$125.00
$250.00

Billed
$125.00
$375.00

Billed
$125.00
$375.00

Billed
$125.00
$375.00

Billed
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$500.00
$125.00

Billed
Billed
Billed
$250.00
$4,750.00

Appeals
$125.00
$375.00

Appeals
$125.00
$250.00

Appeals
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00

Appeals
$125.00
$125.00

Appeals
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00

Appeals
$125.00
$125.00

Appeals
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00

Appeals
Appeals

Appeals
Appeals

Appeals
Appeals
$375.00
$2,375.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$750.00
$125.00
$250.00
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page486
184
13
10 of 44
221
523
50
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
Advanced
Media Group
U.S. District
Court 16-4014
Pro Se Billings
Date
Name
Caterbone v.
Lombardo/Office M
Line Description
Chapter 11 PP&L Dismissal Appe
May 1, 2007 - File Complaint and In Forma Pauperis
Application
Item Description

Billed
Billed
May 4, 2007 - IFP Denied, Error in Caption
May 7, 2007- Refile In Forma Pauperis Application
Billed
Billed
May 9, 2007 - In Forma Pauperis Granted
May 24, 2007 - Entry of Appearence Samuel Cortes of Civil Litigation Hours
Rothschild, LLP for Sam Lombardo
Billed
May 29, 2007 - Entry of Appearence and Answer from Civil Litigation Hours
Kirsten Worley for Office Max
Billed
May 31, 2007 - Preliminary Objections filed by
Samuel Cortes for Lombardo
Billed
June 25, 2007 - File Motion For Continuance
Billed
June 29, 2007 - ORDER by Judge Cullen Denial of
Motion for Continuance Requested to Resubmit with Civil Litigation Hours
Reason
Billed
July 19, 2007 - Request for Interogatories and
Request to Produce Documents Filed by Kirsten
Worley for Office Max
Billed
July 24, 2007 - File Answer to Office Max
Interrogatories
Billed
Billed
Caterbone v. Lombardo/Office M
Caterbone v. U.S.
April 30, 2007 - Bankruptcy Case Docketed. Notice
6/30/2007 Trustee
filed by Stanley J. Caterbone. (clc)
May 10, 2007 - MOTION by Appellant to proceed in
forma pauperis, filed, (clc)
May 10, 2007 - APPEARANCE from Attorney Dave
Adams on behalf of Appellee Kelly B. Stapleton, filed,
(clc)
May 21, 2007 - MOTION by Appellant for Request for
Recusal of Judge Rendell, filed. Answer due 6/4/07.
Certificate of Service dated 5/18/07. (clc)
May 29, 2007 - ORDER (Clerk) granting motion to
proceed in forma pauperis by Appellant. The appeal
will be submitted to a panel for determination under
28 U.S.
June 8, 2007 - MOTION by Appellee to dismiss
appeal, filed. Answer due 6/25/07. Certificate of
Service dated 6/8/07. (clc)
June 19, 2007 - Answer to Motion to Dismiss by
Appellant Stanley J. Caterbone
Caterbone v. U.S. Trustee
June 9, 2006 - Notice of Appeal to U.S. District Court Hours Billed For Civil
Fulton Auto Stay Appeal Judge Brody Appeal Fulton Bank Auto -Stay
Appeals
July 17, 2006 - Response to Fulton Bank Answer to
Appeal
Appeals
August 5, 2006 - Judge Anity Brody ORDER Appeal
Denied
Appeals
April 5, 2007 - Appeal Hearing via Telephone at the
Caterbone v. DPW Food Lancaster County Assistance Office. CASE NO.
8/7/2007 Stamps
#360234927-002
Appeals
April 10, 2007 - Prepare supporting documents for
appeal.
Appeals
April 9, 2007 - ORDER, Denying Appeal
Appeals
April 26, 2007 - Final Administrative Action Order,
DENYING BENEFITS
Appeals
May 9, 2007 - Appeal Hearing and Adjudication via
Telephone held at the Lancaster County Assistance
Office.
Appeals
June 11, 2007 - Appeals Final Decision/FAA
Appeals
Appeals
July 2, 2007 - ORDER Denying Reconsideration
Appeals
July 14, 2007 - Appeal to Commonwealth Court
Rosen Appeals for Food Stamp Benefits
Appeals
Cooksey Appeals for Food Stamps
Appeals
Caterbone v. DPW Food Stamps
Obstruction of Justice - January 16, 2007 - File Civil Action and In Forma
EI
Application Caterbone v. Totaro, et al
Billed
January 23, 2007 - File Exhibits to Complaint
Billed
January 23, 2007 - Appearence by Stephanie Carfly of Civil Litigation Hours
Barley Snyder, LLP, for Fulton Bank
Billed
January 24, 2007 - ORDER In Forma Pauperis
DENIED for Frivilous by Judge Allison
Billed
January 25, 2007 - Notice of Rule 236 Notice sent by Civil Litigation Hours
Prothonetary
Billed
January 29, 2007 - Appeal for Reconsideration to
ORDER of January 24, 2007 by Judge Allison
Billed
February 8, 2007 - Preliminary Objections filed by
Stepanie Carfly of Barley Snyder, LLP for Fulton Bank
February 20, 2007 - Brief filed by Stepanie Carfly of
Barley Snyder, LLP for Fulton Bank in support of
Preliminary Objections

Qty
Unit
Price
Debit
Amount
$2,375.00
Credit
Amount
$125.00
$1,000.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$125.00
$3,250.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$1,000.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$1,000.00
$125.00
$2,500.00
$250.00
$1,875.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$625.00
30
$125.00
$3,750.00
30
$125.00
$3,750.00
$11,250.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$500.00

Billed
$125.00
$250.00

Billed
$125.00
$250.00
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page487
185
14
11 of 44
221
523
50
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
Advanced
Media Group
U.S. District
Court 16-4014
Pro Se Billings
Date
Name
Line Description
February 21, 2007 - Judge Allison ORDER DENIED
Appeal for Reconsideration
February 26, 2007 - Rule 236 Notice from
Prothonatary of ORDER dated January 24, 2007 which
was DENIED.
February 28, 2007 - File ANSWER to Fulton Bank's
March 9, 2007- Filing Fees Remained Unpaid for 10
Days after Rule 236 - Judgement of Non Pros Filed by
Prothonatary
March 12, 2007- Christine Munion, Esq., files Entry of
Appearance for Donald Totaro, Lancaster County
Commissioners, Lancaster County Sheriff, Lancaster
County
March 13, 2007 - Praecipe filed to DEFENDANT
FULTON BANK'S PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO
PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT TO THE COURT FOR
DISPOSITION WITH CERTIFICATE OF SER
Item Description
Billed
Qty
Unit
Price
January 16, 2007 - Praecipe for Appearance by Diana

Clark, for the Pennsylvania Department of Welfare
January 29, 2007 - Preliminary Objections Filed by
Diana Clark of DPW
January 30, 2007 - Brief in Support of Preliminary
Objections filed by Diana Clark and DPW
February 15, 2007 - File Answer to Preliminary
Objections
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$625.00

Billed
$125.00
$125.00

Billed
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00

Appeals
Appeals
Appeals
Billed

Billed
$125.00
$625.00

Billed
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
Civil Litigation
Billed
Civil Litigation
Billed
Civil Litigation
Billed
Civil Litigation
Billed
Hours
Hours
Hours
Hours
May 30, 2007 - Notice of Appearance before Business Civil Litigation Hours
Judge, Judge Farina, refused to hear case
Billed
Emergency Food Stamps
January 2, 2007 - To proceed informa pauperis with
affidavit of financial service filed by Caterbone, pro
se. In support of petition to set aside sale
January 2, 2007 - Caption Caterbone v. Fulton Bank,
Lancaster County Sheriff Department
January 4, 2007 - In Forma Pauperis GRANTED by
Judge Dennis E. Reinaker
January 5, 2007 - Addition to Compliant (Please Add
To Complaint)
January 31, 2007 - Response Of fulton bank to
stanley j. Caterbone's petition to set aside sale of real
estate. Filed by: shawn m. Long, esq. Certificate of
ser
$250.00
$7,375.00
May 29, 2007 - Notice of Appearance Before Business Civil Litigation Hours
Judge for Food Stamps to Reinaker, Recusal
Billed
Petition To Set Aside

Sale
Credit
Amount
$125.00
Obstruction of Justice - EI
January 8, 2007 - (Emergency) for emergency food
stamp benefits and other benefits filed by stanley j.
8/9/2007 Emergency Food Stamps Caterbone, plaintiff, pro se. And affidavit of financial
January 9, 2007 - Filed: and now, jan 8, 2007, upon
consideration of defendant's request to proceed in
forma pauperis,it is ordered that such request is
granted
Debit
Amount

Billed
Billed

Billed
March 16, 2007 - Filed Addendum to Defendants List Billed
April 24, 2007 - Addendum to Complaint filed
Billed
May 11, 2007 - Judgement-Non Pros filed by Chrisine
Munion for Totaro as directed by Wenger,
Prothonotary
Billed
May 24, 2007 - Notice of Appeal to Superior Court of Hours Billed For Civil
the Judgement of Non Pros
Appeals
June 6, 2007 - Notice of Concise Statement of
Matters Complained by June 21, 2007 by Judge
Allison
Appeals
June 21, 2007 - Statement of Matters Complained
filed
Appeals
July 2, 2007 - Response by Fulton Bank on Statement Hours Billed For Civil
of Matters Complained
Appeals
July 16, 2007 - OPINION filed by Judge Paul K. Allison Hours Billed For Civil
to Superior Court
Appeals
July 17, 2007 - Record Sent to Superior Court by
Lancaster County Prothonatary 950 MDA 951 MDA
July 18, 2007 - ORDER from Superior Court DISMISS
950 & 951
July 24, 2007 - Record Returned from the Superior
Court 950 & 951 Memorandum Filed
Civil Litigation
Billed
Civil Litigation
Billed
Civil Litigation
Billed
Civil Litigation
Billed
Hours
$250.00
$2,500.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$250.00

Billed
$125.00
$250.00
January 31, 2007 - Notice of Meeting Before Business Civil Litigation Hours
Judge Michael Georgelis filed by Shawn Long
Billed
$125.00
$375.00
February 1, 2007 - Meeting before Judge Georgelis

and ORDER TO DISMISS PETITION DENIED
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$625.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$500.00
Hours
Hours
Hours

Billed
February 6, 2007 - Reply to Response of Fulton Bank Billed
February 6, 2007 - Notice of DENIAL to all parties
Billed
February 20, 2007 - From james d. Mccullough,
deputy prothonotary, superior court of pennsylvania.
Returned herein is the notice of appeal received in the Hours Billed For Civil
Appeals
proth
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page488
186
15
12 of 44
221
523
50
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
Advanced
Media Group
U.S. District
Court 16-4014
Pro Se Billings
Date
Name
Fulton v. Caterbone
Foreclosur
Line Description
Item Description
Billed
Petition To Set Aside Sale

March 8, 2006 - In mortgage foreclosure filed by
shawn m long esq(ma). The mortgage was recordedin
the office of the recorder of deeds of and for lancaster Civil Litigation Hours
coun
Billed
April 11, 2006 - Complaint. Filed by shawn m. Long,
esq. Reinstated as 1.directed by randall o. Wenger,
prothonotary. (2 copies to atty, 1 copy of complaint
wit
Billed
May 1, 2006 - Complaint Served, Civil action
complaint upon stanley caterbone by personal service
at lancaster county sheriff's office,50 north duke
Billed
street, lan
Billed
May 8, 2006 - Answer to Complaint filed
In support of plaintiff's
motion for judgment on
the pleadings. Filed by
shawn m. Long, esq.
Certificate of service of
June 6, 2006 - Brief
same.
June 6, 2006 - Motion by Fulton for judgement on the Civil Litigation Hours
pleadings filed by Shawn M. Long
Billed
June 28, 2006 - Praecipe filed to assign Plaintiff fulton
bank's motion for summary judgment to the court for Civil Litigation Hours
disposition as unopossed with certific
Billed
June 29, 2006 - ORDER Filed: and now, this 29th day
of june, 2006, upon consideration of plaintiff's motion
for judgment on the pleadings, as well as defendants
July 20, 2006 - Enter judgment on behalf of plaintiff
and against defendant, stanley j. Caterbone in the
amount of $97,425.07, plus continuing interest after
ma
July 25, 2006 - Filed Notice of Appeal to Superior
Court Case No.
July 28, 2006 - A hearing on the defendant's
application for in forma pauperis status will be held in
curtroom 5 at 9:00 a.m. on wednesday, august 9,
2006. By t
July 31, 2006 - Filed. Writ issued. Affidavit of nonmilitary service. Principal: $88,568.53; interest to
03/02/2006 at a rate of $14.56 per diem: $4,442.96;
ne
July 31, 2006 - Affidavit - rule 3129
July 31, 2006 - Notice of

August 1, 2006 - 220 stone hill road, a/k/a lot #5
stone hill rd., conestoga, conestoga township 56
December 20, 2006. Received check from barley
snyder i

Billed
Billed
Billed
Billed
Qty
2
Unit
Price
Debit
Amount
$125.00
$250.00
$3,875.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$625.00
Civil Litigation
$1.00
Hours Billed $125.00
2
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$500.00

Billed
2
$125.00
7/31/2006 Concerning
the real property located
at 220 stone hill road
a/k/a lot #5 stone hill
road, township of
conestog
Civil Litigation
$1.00
7/31/2006 Sheriff's sale
of real property to
stanley j. Caterbone at
220 stone hill road,
conestoga, pa 17516.
Filed by shawn m. Long
Credit
Amount
$250.00
Civil Litigation
$1.00

Billed
$125.00
$125.00

Billed
$125.00
$125.00

Billed
$125.00
$250.00
August 11, 2006 - Filed. The defendant has appealed

my june 29, 2006 order granting the plaintiff's motion Civil Litigation Hours
for judgment on the pleadings. He is directed to file
Billed
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$125.00
$125.00
August 8, 2006 - Served Def. Stanley j. Caterbone,

personally, with a notice of sale and/or handbill at
lancaster county courthouse, 50 north duke st
August 11, 2006 - In Forma Pauperis With praecipe to
proceed in forma pauperis presented to court and
court enters order granting in forma pauperis status.
Mich
August 17, 2006 - Of notice of sheriff's sale by mail to

lienholders on aug. 11, 2006. Filed by shawn m.
Civil Litigation
Long, esq. Of the notice of sheriff sale upon defenda Billed
Civil Litigation
August 31, 2006 - Served Writ of Execution
Billed
September 5, 2006-OPINION Pursuant to pa.r.a.p.
1025(a) filed. By the court: michael a. Georgelis,
judge. Copies w/236 notice sent to: stanley j.
Civil Litigation
Caterbone, pro
Billed
September 6, 2006-The superior court of
pennsylvania - no. 1463 mda 2006. Copy of the list of
record documents sent to: stanley j. Caterbone, pro Civil Litigation
se and shawn m
Billed
Caterbone v. Lanc Co
3/1/2007 Prison et
Hours
Hours
Hours
Hours
January 8, 2006-Certified copy of Order from the

superior court of pennsylvania - no. 1463 mda 2006 Civil Litigation Hours
filed. And now, this fourth day of january, 2007
Billed
Fulton v. Caterbone Foreclosur
Jan 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
County Prison, et al U.S. District Court 05-2288 Case
Finding of Facts and Data
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page489
187
16
13 of 44
221
523
50
$500.00
$5,375.00
120
$75.00
$9,000.00
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
Advanced
Media Group
U.S. District
Court 16-4014
Pro Se Billings
Date
Name
Line Description
Feb 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
Mar 2006 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
Apr 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
May 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
Item Description
6/17/2007
Aug 18 2006 RESPONSE to Fulton Bank's motion to

establish deadline for plff to file amended complaint in
accordance with the Court's order of 6/19/06,
Apr 10 2006 Motion for Continuance Caterbone v.
Lancaster County Prison, et al from Lancaster General
Hopital to Judge McLaughlin Granted
Caterbone v. Lanc Co Prison et
Sept 6, 2006 Notice of Appeal Third Circuit Court of
Appeals Case No. 06-3955 Legal Work Done On Pro
Se Civil Appeal Case
Sept 8, 2006 Letter from Third Circuit Legal Division
re Jurisdictional Dismissal
Sept 18 2006 Research and Analysis Notice of
Appearences Fultong Bank, Manheim Twp Police;
Fulton Bank Disclosure Statement
Sept 25 2006 Notice of Appearence Avalon Police
Dept
Sept 25 2006 Notice of Appearance Mellon Bank;
Disclosure Statement
Sept 28 2006 Reponse to Legal Division by Fulton
Bank in support of dismissal
Oct 2 2006 Notice of Appearance Lancaster County
Prison
Oct 11 2006 Reponse to Legal Division by Manheim
Twp Police Chris Underhill in support of dismissal
Qty
Unit
Price
Debit
Amount
Credit
Amount
120
$75.00
$9,000.00
120
$75.00
$9,000.00
120
$75.00
$9,000.00
60
$75.00
$4,500.00
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
20
$75.00
$1,500.00

Billed
30
$125.00
$3,750.00
30
$75.00
$2,250.00
30
$150.00
$4,500.00
30
$75.00
$2,250.00
$125.00
$625.00
30
$75.00
$2,250.00
20
$75.00
$1,500.00

Billed
10
$125.00
$1,250.00

Billed
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
20
$75.00
$1,500.00
20
$75.00
$1,500.00

Billed
15
$125.00
$1,875.00

Billed
$125.00
May 2005 General Hours Billed For May 16 2005 Legal

Work Done On Caterbone v. Lancaster County Prison, Civil Litigation Hours
et al U.S. District Court 05-2288 Pro Se Civil Case
Billed
Jun 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
Jul 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
Aug 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
Sep 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
Oct 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
Nov 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
Dec 2005 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
Jan 2006 General Hours Billed For Jan 23 2006 Legal
Work Caterbone v. Lancaster County Prison, et al 052288 Case Served Defendants per Judge Mclaughlin
Feb 2006 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
Mar 2006 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
Apr 2006 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
Apr 10 2006 Motion for Continuance Caterbone v.
Lancaster County Prison, et al from Lancaster General
Hopital to Judge McLaughlin Granted
May 2006 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
Jun 2006 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
Jun 1 2006 Motion for Ex Parte Meeting w/Judge
McLaughlin Caterbone v. Lancaster County Prison, et
al U.S. District Court 05-2288 Case
Jun 14 2006 REPLY to Fulton Bank's response to plff's
motion for ex parte meeting with Honorable Mary A.
McLaughlin,
Jul 2006 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster
Aug 2006 Research Billed for Caterbone v. Lancaster

Billed
$625.00
$77,375.00

Appeals
Appeals
Hours Billed
Appeals
Hours Billed
Appeals
Hours Billed
Appeals
Hours Billed
Appeals
Hours Billed
Appeals
For Civil
For Civil
For Civil
For Civil
For Civil

Appeals
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page490
188
17
14 of 44
221
523
50
10
$125.00
$1,250.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$375.00
$125.00
$250.00
$125.00
$375.00
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
Advanced
Media Group
U.S. District
Court 16-4014
Pro Se Billings
Date
Name
Line Description
Dec 1 2006 In Forrma Pauperis Application Granted
Apr 30 2007 Addendum to Appeal filed; Letter to
McLaughlin, DARPA, Parula Property Stolen
Item Description
Appeals
Appeals

Qty
Unit
Price
$125.00
$125.00
Debit
Amount
Credit
Amount
$375.00
$625.00
$4,500.00
Total Amount Billed

To Date
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page491
189
18
15 of 44
221
523
50
$284,702.50
$283,952.50
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
2/12/08 at 09:15:50.15
Page: 1a
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Sales Journal
For the Period From Jan 1, 2007 to Dec 31, 2008
Filter Criteria includes: Report order is by Invoice Date. Report is printed in Detail Format.
Date
Invoice
Customer ID
3/1/07
7001
05-2288
Line Description
Item Description
Jan 2005 Research Billed for

Caterbone v. Lancaster County
Prison, et al U.S. District Court
05-2288 Case Finding of Facts
and Data
Feb 2005 Research Billed for
and Data
Mar 2006 Research Billed for
and Data
Apr 2005 Research Billed for
and Data
May 2005 Research Billed for
and Data
May 2005 General Hours Billed
For May 16 2005 Legal Work
Done On Caterbone v. Lancaster
County Prison, et al U.S. District
Court 05-2288 Pro Se Civil Case
Jun 2005 Research Billed for
and Data
Jul 2005 Research Billed for
and Data
Aug 2005 Research Billed for
and Data
Sep 2005 Research Billed for
and Data
Oct 2005 Research Billed for
and Data
Nov 2005 Research Billed for
and Data
Dec 2005 Research Billed for
and Data
Jan 2006 General Hours Billed
For Jan 23 2006 Legal Work
Prison, et al 05-2288 Case
Served Defendants per Judge
Mclaughlin
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page492
190
19
16 of 44
221
523
50
Qty
Unit Price Debit Amnt
Credit Amn
120.00
75.00
9,000.00
120.00
75.00
9,000.00
120.00
75.00
9,000.00
120.00
75.00
9,000.00
60.00
75.00
4,500.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
20.00
75.00
1,500.00
20.00
75.00
1,500.00
20.00
75.00
1,500.00
20.00
75.00
1,500.00
20.00
75.00
1,500.00
20.00
75.00
1,500.00
20.00
75.00
1,500.00
30.00
125.00
3,750.00
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
2/12/08 at 09:15:50.26
Page: 2a
Sales Journal
Date
3/1/07
Invoice
7002
Customer ID
05-23059
Line Description
Item Description
Feb 2006 Research Billed for

and Data
Mar 2006 Research Billed for
and Data
Apr 2006 Research Billed for
and Data
Apr 10 2006 Motion for
Continuance Caterbone v.
Lancaster County Prison, et al
from Lancaster General Hopital
to Judge McLaughlin Granted
May 2006 Research Billed for
and Data
Jun 2006 Research Billed for
and Data
Jun 1 2006 Motion for Ex Parte
Meeting w/Judge McLaughlin
05-2288 Case
Jun 14 2006 REPLY to Fulton
Bank's response to plff's motion
for ex parte meeting with
Honorable Mary A. McLaughlin,
Jul 2006 Research Billed for
and Data
Aug 2006 Research Billed for
and Data
Aug 18 2006 RESPONSE to
Fulton Bank's motion to establish
deadline for plff to file amended
complaint in accordance with the
Court's order of 6/19/06,
Apr 10 2006 Motion for
Continuance Caterbone v.
Lancaster County Prison, et al
from Lancaster General Hopital
to Judge McLaughlin Granted
30.00
75.00
2,250.00
Court Time Hours Bill
30.00
150.00
4,500.00
30.00
75.00
2,250.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
30.00
75.00
2,250.00
20.00
75.00
1,500.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
20.00
75.00
1,500.00
20.00
75.00
1,500.00
15.00
125.00
1,875.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
May 2005 Research Filing of

Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Petition for Bankruptcy, Russell
Kraft, Nettleton & Fenefrock
May 23 2005 File for Chapter 11 Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Bankruptcy Protection in Federal
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania, Reading
June 21 2005 Notice of Appeal
Chapter 11 Appeal Ho
Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone
Regarding
6/13/2005
Order
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page
191
493
20
17 of 44
221
523
50
Dismissing Case for Debtor's
Qty
Credit Amn
77,375.00
20.00
125.00
2,500.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
2/12/08 at 09:15:50.26
Page: 3a
Sales Journal
Date
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Item Description
Dismissing Case for Debtor's

Failure to Timely File Required
Documents to
Jun 2005 Administration,
Reporting and Communication
with Creditors and Accounts
Payables for Chapter 11
Bankruptcy Case 05-23059
Jul 1 2005 In Reading Appellant Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Designation of Contents For
Inclusion in Record On Appeal,
and Findings of Fact Filed by
Stanley J. Caterbone .
(Attachments: #
Jul 2005 Administration,
Aug 2005 Administration,
Sep 2005 Administration,
Oct 2005 Administration,
Nov 2005 Administration,
Dec 2005 Administration,
Dec 15 2005 Amended Schedules Chapter 11 Hours Bill
F & G Filed by Amended Matrix
Stanley J. Caterbone ; Receipt
Number 20074028, Fee Amount
$26.00. (P., Cathy) (Entered:
12/16/2005)
Jan 2006 Administration,
Feb 2006 Administration,
Apr 2006 Administration,
May 2006 Administration,
Jun
2006 Administration,
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page494
192
21
18 of 44
221
523
50Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Qty
Credit Amn
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
10.00
125.00November
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
December
November27,
30,
7,
1,250.00
2015
2016
2/12/08 at 09:15:50.32
Page: 4a
Sales Journal
Date
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Jun 29 2006 Hearing Held - RE:
Motion to Dismiss Case, or
Conversion of Case to Chapter 7
Filed by United States Trustee (
Jul 2006 Administration,
Aug 2006 Administration,
Sep 2006 Administration,
Jan 2007 Administration,
3/16/07
3/16/07
06-cv-5138
1462-MDA-2006
Item Description
Qty
Credit Amn
7.00
150.00
1,050.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
25,800.00
Nov 20, 2006 - General Hours

Billed For Legal Work Done On
Pro Se Civil Appeal Case
Harbeas Corpus filed from
Lancaster County Prison on
November 17, 2006
January 19, 2007 - ADDENDUM
to 2241 Habeas Corpus Petition
by STANLEY J. CATERBONE.
Certificate of Service, (gs)
(Entered: 01/22/2007)
April 17, 2007 - ORDER THAT
THE CLERK SHALL
PROMPTLY FURNISH
PETITIONER WITH THE IN
FORMA PAUPERIS
APPLICATION FORM AND
PETITIONER SHALL EITHER
COMPLETE AND RET
May 31, 2007 - EXHIBIT to 28
U.S.C. Section 2241 Habeas
Corpus Petition by STANLEY J.
CATERBONE. Certificate of
Service (gs) (Entered:
06/01/2007)
June 4, 2007 - EXHIBIT to
U.S.C. Sec. 2241 Habeas Copus
Petition by STANLEY J.
CATERBONE. (gs) (Entered:
06/04/2007)
Federal Habeau Corpus
15.00
125.00
1,875.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
Aug 2006 General Hours Billed

For Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Case
Sep 2006 General Hours Billed
Civil Case
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
8.00
125.00
1,000.00
3,000.00
3/16/07
CI-06-07376
Aug
2 2006 General
Hours
Billed
Stan
Advanced
ADVANCED
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page
193
495
22
19
of 44
221
523
50Civil Litigation Hours
2,250.00
10.00
125.00November
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
December
November27,
30,
7,
1,250.00
2015
2016
2/12/08 at 09:15:50.37
Page: 5a
Sales Journal
Date
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Civil Case Filed Complaint
Aug 24 2006 General Hours
Pro Se Civil Case Filed Default
Notice
Caterbone v. Caterbone,Michael
3/16/07
3/16/07
3/16/07
CI-06-06658
CI-06-07188
CI-06-03401
Item Description
Qty
2.00
125.00
Credit Amn
250.00
1,500.00
Jul 14 2006 General Hours Billed

Civil Case Filed Complaint & In
Forma Pauperis Denied by
Georgelis
Aug 25 General Hours Billed For
Legal Work Done On Pro Se
Civil Case Refiled In Forma
Pauperis Granted by Cullen
Sep 5 2006 General Hours Billed
Civil Appeal Case Filed Appeal
to Superior Court of
Pennsylvania
General Hours Billed For Legal
Work Done On Pro Se Civil
Appeal Case Transfered from
Superior Court to Commonwealth
Court of Common Pleas
15.00
125.00
1,875.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
8.00
125.00
1,000.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
Jul 26 2006 General Hours Billed

Civil Case Filed Complaint with
10 Aug 2006 General Hours
Pro Se Chapter 11 Case
Transfered to Chapter 11 Case by
PP&L
Caterbone v. PP&L Electric
8.00
125.00
1,000.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
3,750.00
Feb 2005 General Hours Billed

Civil Case Meetings &
Communications with Chief of
Southern Regional Police Fiorill
Mar 2005 General Hours Billed
Civil Case Meetings &
Communications with Chief of
Southern Regional Police Fiorill
Apr 4 2006 General Hours Billed Civil Litigation Hours
Civil Case Prepared Complaint
and Email to Don Totaro,
Lancaster County DA
Apr 11 2006 General Hours
Pro Se Civil Case Filed
Complaint
Apr 28 2006 Ammend Complaint Civil Litigation Hours
Work Done On Pro Se Civil Case
May 15 2006 General Hours
Pro Se Civil Case Certificate of
Service Personal Delivery to
William Cambell of Quarryville
Jun 10 2006 Motion for
Continuance General Hours
Pro
Se Civil Case
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page496
194
23
20 of 44
221
523
50
1,125.00
15.00
125.00
1,875.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
20.00
125.00
2,500.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
2/12/08 at 09:15:50.42
Page: 6a
Sales Journal
Date
3/16/07
3/16/07
Invoice
Customer ID
CI-06-08490
Item Description
Qty
Credit Amn
Jun 15 2006 Reponsive Brief to

Preliminary Objections General
Hours Billed For Legal Work
Jul 25 2006 Appealed to Superior
Court of Pennsylvania General
Done On Pro Se Civil Appeal
Case
Aug 09 Lancaster County Court
of Common Pleas Time For
Court Appearance and Litigation
Shawn Long Appeared at
Defendants Table before Court,
walked out
Oct 30 2006 Filed Amended
Complaint from Bausman Post
Office, General Hours Billed For
Civil Appeal Case
Nov 7 2006 Filed for
Continuance from Lancaster
County Prison General Hours
Pro Se Civil Case
Caterbone v. Southern Regional
12.00
125.00
1,500.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
4.00
150.00
600.00
12.00
125.00
1,500.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
Sep 1 2006 Complaint & In

Forma Pauperis Filed General
Done On Pro Se Civil Case IFP
Granted Judge Ashworth
Mar 26 2007 File Response to
Preliminary Objections to
Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas General Hours
Pro Se Civil Case
Caterbone v. Millersville Poli
15.00
125.00
1,875.00
20.00
125.00
2,500.00
12,100.00
4,375.00
Sep 11 2006 Filed Complaint &

In Forma Pauperis General Hours
Pro Se Civil Case IFP Denied by
Judge Reinaker
Sep 14 2006 Second In Forma
Pauperis Application Filed &
Approved by Judge Joseph
Madenspacher
Caterbone v. Benjamin Roda
8.00
125.00
1,000.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
Aug 1 2006 Complaint &

Informa Pauperis Filed with
Advanced Media Group General Hours Billed For Legal
Case, IFP Granted by Georgeli
Aug 24 2006 Important Notice of Civil Litigation Hours
Default Filed - General Hours
Pro Se Civil Case
Sep 27 2006 Filed Reply to
Preliminary Objections - General
Oct 23 Filed Brief in Support of
Arbitration - General Hours
Pro Se Civil Case
Nov 7 2006 Filed Motion for 60
Day
Continuance
- General
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page
195
497
24
21 of 44
221
523
50
20.00
125.00
2,500.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
7.00
125.00
875.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
3/16/07
CI-06-08742
Line Description
CI-06-07330
1,500.00
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
2/12/08 at 09:15:50.42
Page: 7a
Sales Journal
Date
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Item Description

Mar 7 2007 Filed Amended
Complaint - General Hours Billed
Civil Case
Caterbone v. Harleysville et
3/16/07
3/16/07
3/16/07
3/17/07
3/17/07
3/18/07
CI-05-03403
CI-06-03349
CI-06-04939
TR-0003557-2006
TR-0004428-2006
CP-36-SA0000141-2005
Qty
7.00
125.00
Credit Amn
875.00
5,500.00
Apr 11 2006 Filed Complaint Civil Litigation Hours

Jun 6 2006 Filed Important
Notice of Default - General
Caterbone v. Grassell, Thomas
15.00
125.00
1,875.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
Apr 10 2006 Filed Complaint,

walked to Courthouse directly
after discharge from Hospital General Hours Billed For Legal
Apr 28 2006 Filed Amended
Complaint - General Hours Billed
Civil Case
25.00
125.00
3,125.00
8.00
125.00
1,000.00
May 24 2006 Filed Complaint & Civil Litigation Hours

In Forma Pauperis Application General Hours Billed For Legal
IFP Denied by Judge Reinaker
Caterbone v. Pflumm,Mike et al
8.00
2006 General Hours Billed For

Hours Billed For Crim
Criminal Case Downtown
Lancaster Parking Meter
Violation MDJ Simms
2006 Time For Court Appearance Court Time Hours Bill
and Litigation For Parking Meter
Violation
5.00
125.00
625.00
3.00
150.00
450.00
Aug 2006 General Hours Billed

Criminal Case Downtown
Lancaster Parking Meter
Violation MDJ Simms
Oct 5 2006 Time For Court
Appearance and Litigation MDJ
Simms Parking Meter Violation
5.00
125.00
625.00
3.00
150.00
450.00
May 10 2005 General Hours

18$2709$$A3 Harassment w/Tim
Decker Killing of Cat SRPD
Humane Legue Witness
Sep 28 2005 General Hours
Pro Se Criminal Appeal Case
Notice of Appeal Stolen From
Mail, Never Appeared For Trial,
Judge Allison
Fines $442.00 Paid General
Done On Pro Se Criminal Appeal
Case
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page498
196
25
22 of 44
221
523
50
2,375.00
4,125.00
125.00
1,000.00
1,000.00
1,075.00
1,075.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
2/12/08 at 09:15:50.59
Page: 8a
Sales Journal
Date
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Item Description
Qty
3/18/07
3/18/07
CP-36-MD0000010-2007
CP-36-CR0003179-2006
Jan 09 2007 General Hours

Filed Nunc Pro Tunc, Denied by
Reainaker
Jan 19 2007 General Hours
Refiled, Denied Again
Credit Amn
1,875.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
Jul 5 2006 PrelimiHearing

Work Done On Pro Se Criminal
Case MDJ Hamilton, Fire M.
Bomberger, Public Defender,
MDJ Hamilton Guilty
Oct 12 2006 Pretrial Conference Court Time Hours Bill
Case Continued Judge Allison
Case $75$3733$$A M2
Nov 09 2006 Pretrial Conference Court Time Hours Bill
Case Continued Judge Allison
Case From Lanc Co Prison
Dec 14 2006 Call of the Trial List Court Time Hours Bill
Continued Judge Ashworth
(Cullen) General Hours Billed
Criminal Case From Lanc Co
Prison
Jan 22 2007 Call of the Trial List Court Time Hours Bill
Scheduled for Trial Judge Farina
(Cullen) General Hours Billed
Criminal Case Janice Longer
Appo
Time For Court Appearance and Court Time Hours Bill
Litigation
Feb 23 2006 Complaint Filed to
Lancaster County Bar v. Janice
Longer General Hours Billed For
Criminal Case
Feb 26 Call of the Trial List
Scheduled for Trial General
Feb 28 2006 Filed Response to
Longer Petition to Withdraw
From Case General Hours Billed
Criminal Case
Mar 1 2007 General Hours Billed Hours Billed For Crim
Criminal Case Meeting with
Janice Longer To Prepare
Mar 4 2007 Trial Court Judge
Cullen Continued Case to April
Court ScheduleTime For Court
Appearance and Litigation
Mar 4 2007 File Supreme Court
Diciplinary Complaint v. Janice
Longer General Hours Billed For
Criminal Case
Mar
22 2007 Research
&499
Review
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page
197
26
23 of 44
221
523
50Hours Billed For Crim
Pa Consolodated Statutes
500.00
12.00
125.00
1,500.00
4.00
150.00
600.00
4.00
150.00
600.00
4.00
150.00
600.00
4.00
150.00
600.00
4.00
150.00
600.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
4.00
150.00
600.00
6.00
125.00
750.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
3.00Tuesday
125.00November
375.00
Wednesday
Saturday,
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
2/12/08 at 09:15:50.64
Page: 9a
Sales Journal
Date
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Item Description
Pa Consolodated Statutes
Annotated at Law Library
Case
Mar 26 Letter to Janice Longer & Hours Billed For Crim
Review Motion to Dismiss
QuashGeneral Hours Billed For
Criminal Case
3/18/07
CP-36-CR0002843-2006
Dec 5 2005 Preliminary Hearing Hours Billed For Crim

Judge Reuter, Bezzard had to
Refile or Dismiss General Hours
Pro Se Criminal Case East
Lampeter Twp
May 18 2006 Lancaster County
DA Office Refile Charges
Case 4 Charges-Harras Dis
Ord,Theft,Harrasment
Litigation
Jun 23 2006 Meeting with Matt
Bomberger, Public Defender
Case
Jul 26 2006 Fromal Arraignment Court Time Hours Bill
Lanaster County Court of
Common PleasTime For Court
Jul 26 2006 File In Forma
Pauperis Granted General Hours
Aug 2 2006 File Motion Bill of
Particulars Discovery General
Sep 14 2006 Pretrial Conference Court Time Hours Bill
Judge AllisonTime For Court
Oct 20 2006 Call of the Trial List Court Time Hours Bill
Judge Farina Time For Court
Nov 27 2006 Call of the Trial
List Judge FarinaTime For Court
Appearance and Litigation From
Lancaster County Prison
Nov to Dec 2006 Research Billed Research Hours Billed
For Case From Lancaster County
Prison Law Library
Dec 4 2006 Trial Judge Farina
Sent to 1250 Fremont & 220
Stone Hill Rd to get files Time
For Court Appearance and
Litigation Dismiss Harassment,
Change to Summa
Dec 5 2007 Trial Time For Court Court Time Hours Bill
Appearance and Litigation Guilty
Harrasment & Disorderly
Conduct, Not Guilty Thef of
Service
Dec 2007 Filed Appeals &
Motions General Hours Billed
For
Legal WorkPage
Done
On
Pro of
Se 44
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
198
500
27
24
221
523
50
Criminal Appeal Case From
Qty
2.00
125.00
0.10
150.00
Credit Amn
250.00
15.00
8,990.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
10.00
150.00
1,500.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
4.00
150.00
600.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
4.00
150.00
600.00
5.00
150.00
750.00
5.00
150.00
750.00
7.00
75.00
525.00
7.00
150.00
1,050.00
5.00
150.00
750.00
6.00
125.00
750.00
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
2/12/08 at 09:15:50.75
Page: 10a
Sales Journal
Date
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Criminal Appeal Case From
Jan 4 2007 Notict of Appeal to
Superior Court Case No. MDA
125 General Hours Billed For
Jan 26 2007 Meet with Court
Reporters Office to Get
Electronic Version of Transcript
& ReGeneral Hours Billed For
Feb 7 2007 Meet with Andrew
Wagner of Court Collections
Office for Payment of Fines and
Costs and Remove Payment Due
Feb 23 2007 Meet with Andrew
Wagner of Court Collections to
Have Payment Due Removed
Appeal Case
3/18/07
3/18/07
CP-36-SA0000028-2007
CP-36-SA0000028-2007
Aug 2006 Filed U.S. Post Office

Correspondence & Complaint to
SRPDTime For Court
Oct 30 2007 Plead Not Guilty to
MDJ Eckert Picked Up by
Constables General Hours Billed
Criminal Case
Nov 14 2006 File Habeus Corpus
to U.S. District Court of Eastern
District of PA General Hours
Lanc Pri
Dec 2006 Research Billed For
Case From Lancaster County
Prison Law Library
Dec 8 2006 Filed Writ of
Mandamus From Lancaster
County PrisonGeneral Hours
Jan 4 2007 Filed Motion for
Continuance/Change Venue
Case Moved From Eckert to
Stotlzfus
Jan 18 2007 Trial MDJ
StoltzfusTime For Court
Appearance and Litigation Guilty
Harr, Dis Con, Obs, Dismiss
DUSus Fin Responsi Fine $954
Joe Caterbone
Jan 25 2007 Filed Trial De Novo
Appeal to Lancaster County
Court of Common Pleas General
Case
Item Description
Qty
Credit Amn
4.00
125.00
500.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
11,650.00
10.00
150.00
1,500.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
7.00
125.00
875.00
5.00
75.00
375.00
8.00
125.00
1,000.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
6.00
150.00
900.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
Aug 15 2006 Hearing MDJ

Commins Robert M. Fedor
General
Hours Billed
For
Legal
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page
199
501
28
25
of 44
221
523
50
6,275.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
2/12/08 at 09:15:50.86
Page: 11a
Sales Journal
Date
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Item Description

Case 2 Girls Walking Guilty Fine
$315.66
Dec 15 2006 Summary Appeal
Trial Judge Perezous Found
Guilty ?? April 2 Day of Daylight
Person Broke Into 220 Stone Hill
Road, Mike on Cell Phone,
Kennet SPoli
3/18/07
3/18/07
CP-36-CR0000160-2006
CP-36-MD0000006-2007
Jul 14 2006 Hearing MDJ

Hamilton General Hours Billed
Criminal Case Fines $367.50
Jul 25 2006 Notice of Summary
Appeal to Court of Common
PleasGeneral Hours Billed For
Nov 14 2006 Filed Motion for
Continuance From Lancaster
County PrisonJudge Cullen
Denied General Hours Billed For
Dec 2006 Lancaster County
Prison Law Library Research
Billed For Case
Dec 5 2006 Trial Judge Perezous
Granted Motion For Continuance
Time For Court Appearance and
Litigation
Dec 22 2006 Motion for
Transcripts Filed from Lancaster
County Prison General Hours
Jan 21 2007 Filed Motion For
Continuance Granted Judge
Perezous General Hours Billed
Qty
3.00
125.00
Credit Amn
375.00
1,000.00
8.00
125.00
1,000.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
5.00
75.00
375.00
4.00
150.00
600.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
4.00
125.00
500.00

Mandamus v. MDJ Eckert From
Lancaster County Prison General
Mandamus v. MDJ Commins
From Lancaster County Prison
Case
Jan 09 2007 Filed Motion for
Change of Venue Deinied Judge
Reinaker General Hours Billed
Criminal Case
Jan 11 2007 Motion for
Continance Filed Denied Judge
Reinaker General Hours Billed
Criminal Case
Jan 17 2007 Motion for
Reconsideration Filed Denied
Judge Reinaker General Hours
Pro
Se CriminalPage
Case
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page502
200
29
26 of 44
221
523
50
3,600.00
6.00
125.00
750.00
6.00
125.00
750.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
2/12/08 at 09:15:50.97
Page: 12a
Sales Journal
Date
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Item Description
Qty
3/18/07
3/20/07
3/20/07
3/20/07
3/20/07
3/20/07
3/20/07
CP-36-CR0000055-2006
CP-36-CR0000051-2007
CP-36-CR0000012-2007
CP-36-CR0000011-2007
CP-36-CR0000010-2007
CP-36-CR0000011-2007
05-3689
Jan 19 2007 Filed Motion to

Proceed In Forma Pauperis
Case
Credit Amn
2,875.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
250.00
Jan 12 2007 File Change of

Venue/ Continuance MDEckert
Citations Denied by Judge Cullen
Appeal Case
4.00
Jan 05 2007 Filed Application to

File Nunc Pro Tunc for MDJ
Simms Citations General Hours
4.00



File In Forma Pauperis for MDJ
125.00
500.00
500.00
125.00
500.00
500.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
500.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
500.00
July 15, 2005 - Certificate of

Appeal of STANLEY
CATERBONE from the order of
Bankruptcy Judge Thomas M.
Twardowski. (tj, ) (Entered:
07/18/2005)
July 15, 2005 - Briefing Schedule Chapter 11 Appeal Ho
7/18/05 Entered and copies
mailed, (tj, ) (Entered:
07/18/2005)
July 28, 2005 - BRIEF TO
ORDER TO DISMISS ON
6/13/05 by STANLEY
CATERBONE. (ami, ) (Entered:
07/29/2005)
September 23, 2005 - ORDER
TO SHOW CAUSE BY
OCTOBER 3, 2005, WHY IN
LIGHT OF
DEBTOR-APPELLANT'S
NOTICE OF APPEAL (BKY.
DOCKET #12) AND BRIEF
(DOCKET #3), THIS C
October 3, 2005 - RESPONSE
TO THE ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE
WHY THE
DEBTOR'S
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page
201
503
30
27 of 44
221
523
50
BANKRUPTCY CASE
2.00
125.00
250.00
250.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
8.00
125.00
1,000.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
2/12/08 at 09:15:51.03
Page: 13a
Sales Journal
Date
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Item Description
BANKRUPTCY CASE
SHOULD NOT BE
REINSTATED by UNITED
STATES TRUSTEE,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
October 6, 2005 - ORDER THAT Chapter 11 Appeal Ho
THIS CASE IS REINSTATED
IN THE U.S. BANKRUPTCY
COURT FOR THE EASTERN
DISTRICT PROVIDED THAT
DEBTOR- APPELLANT
COMPLY WITH THE RULES
November 7, 2005 - Original
Bankruptcy Record returned to
the Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania,
(afm, ) (Entered: 1 1/08/2005)
November 14, 2005 - Letter from Chapter 11 Appeal Ho
U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT
re: received original record on
11/10/05. (afm, ) (Entered:
11/14/2005)
Chapter 11 Dismissal Appeal
3/20/07
3/20/07
06-1538
06-4154
May 15 2006 File Appeal to

Automatic Stay Order of Judge
Fehling to Judge Anita Brody
Appeal Case
Sept 18, 2006 - Certificate of

Appeal of STANLEY J.
CATERBONE, ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP from the order
of Bankruptcy Judge Richard E.
Fehling. (tj,) (Entered: 09/18
October 10, 2007 - Certificate of Hours Billed For Civil
Appeal of STANLEY J.
CATERBONE, ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP from the order
of Bankruptcy Judge Richard E.
Fehling. (tj,) (Entered: 09
October 17, 2007 - Brief in
Opposition re 3 Appellant's Brief
by PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES.
(HENRY, MICHAEL) Modified
on 10/18/2006 (np). (Entered:
10/17/2006)
November 15, 2007 - MOTION
FOR CONTINUANCE FILED
BY STANLEY J.
CATERBONE.(gs) Additional
attachment(s) added on
12/13/2006 (mo,). (Entered:
11/16/2006) fro
Appeal Case
February 7, 2007 - MOTION
FOR CONTINUANCE FILED
BY STANLEY J. CATERBONE,
PRO SE,CERTIFICATE OF
SERVICE.(ac, ) (Entered:
02/09/2007)
February 21, 2007 - ORDER that Hours Billed For Civil
APPELLANT STANLEY J.
CATERBONE'S MOTION FOR
A CONTINUANCE IS
GRANTED.
APPELLANT
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page504
202
31
28MAY
of 44
221
523
50
FILE A REPLY BRIEF IN THE
Qty
Credit Amn
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
3,125.00
20.00
125.00
2,500.00
2,500.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
1.50
125.00
187.50
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
2/12/08 at 09:15:51.08
Page: 14a
Sales Journal
Date
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
FILE A REPLY BRIEF IN THE
ABOVE-CAPTIONED CAS
April 13, 2007 - MOTION FOR
CONTINUANCE FILED BY
STANLEY J. CATERBONE,
PRO SE. (SEE 05-2288, PAPER
NO. 50).(ac, ) (Entered:
04/13/2007)
Appeal Case
Item Description
Qty
2.00
125.00
250.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
3.00
125.00
Chapter 11 Amend Dismissal

3/22/07
3/22/07
MDA 125-2006
TR-0000085--2006
Jan 4 2007 Filed Notice of

Appeal to Superior Court Filed at
Lancaster County Clerk of
CoGeneral Hours Billed For
Jan 11 2007 Filed Motion For
Continuance Granted General
Case
Feb 12 2997 Filed Concise
Statement of Matters
Complainted on Appeal General
Case
Mar 27 2007 Meeting with
Lancaster County Clerk of Courts
Review & Correct Index of
RecorGeneral Hours Billed For
Credit Amn
375.00
3,312.50
3.00
125.00
375.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
12.00
125.00
1,500.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
Jun 28 2006 Hearing Preparation Hours Billed For Crim

Case
Jun 28 2007 Hearing at 1281 S
28th St. Harrisburg Guilty MDJ
Smith Time For Court
Oct ?? 2006 Phone Call & Letter Hours Billed For Crim
For Payment of Fine & Costs
Case
Jan 1 2007 Letter to MDJ Smith
Re Payment of Fines General
Case
Jan 15 2007 Filed Application
For Leave Nunc Pro TuncGeneral
Case
Feb 15 2007 Filed In Forma
Pauperis In Dauphin County
Court of Common Pleas Granted
Appeal Case
Mar 8 2007 Filed Notice of
Appeal to Superior Court in
Dauphin
CountyPage
Court
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
PageMDA
203
505
32
29 of 44
221
523
50
435-2007 General Hours Billed
2,625.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
5.00
150.00
750.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
2/12/08 at 09:15:51.14
Page: 15a
Sales Journal
Date
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Item Description
Qty
435-2007 General Hours Billed

3/22/07
3/28/07
3/28/07
MDA 435-2007
248 MAL 2007
06-cv-4734
Credit Amn
3,250.00
Mar 25 2007 Filed Docketing

Statement to Superior Court of
Pennsylvania General Hours
Mar 27 2007 File Response to

Fulton Bank Motion to Dismiss
Case General Hours Billed For
Civil Appeal Case
Fulton Bank v Caterbone, Stan
4.00
125.00
500.00
500.00
110/20/2006 - File Federal False Civil Litigation Hours

Claims Act, No Complaint Copy
Satute FMG, AMG, Global,
Radio Science Laboratories,
Power Productions v. ISC,
Attorney General,
11/16/2006 - MOTION for Leave Civil Litigation Hours
to Proceed in forma pauperis filed
by STANLEY J.
CATERBONE.(tj, ) (Entered:
10/23/2006)
11/16/2006 - ORDER THAT
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO PROCEED IN
FORMA PAUPERIS IS
GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER
ORDERED THAT THIS CASE
IS DISMISSED FOR FAILURE
TO S
COMPLAINT AGAINST
ATTORNEY GENERAL,
INTERNATIONAL SIGNAL &
CONTROL, PLC FILED BY
PRO SE, ADVANCED MEDIA
GROUP, LTD., ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP,
02/07/2007 - MOTION FOR
PRO SE,CERTIFICATE OF
SERVICE.(ac, ) (Entered:
02/09/2007)
Mar 16 2007 Letter to U.S.
Senator Arlen Specter Regarding
Obstruciton of Justice General
Mar 12 2007 Meet Lisa Owings
staffer on Judiciary Comitte from
Senator Specter at Chamber
Building General Hours Billed
Civil Case
Mar 13 2007 Letter to Lisa
Owings of Senator Specter Office
Work
Done On Pro
Se Civil
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page
204
506
33
30Case
of 44
221
523
50
3.00
125.00
375.00
375.00
6.00
125.00
750.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
2/12/08 at 09:15:51.25
Page: 16a
Sales Journal
Date
6/1/07
Invoice
Customer ID
06-4650
Line Description
Item Description
Qty

03/23/2007 - ORDER THAT
THE PLAINTIFF SHALL
SUBMIT A COPY OF HIS
MOTION FOR
CONTINUANCE BY 4/6/07.
SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A.
MCLAUGHLIN ON 3/22/07.
3/23/07 ENTERE
Mar 24 2007 Letter to Senator
Specter General Hours Billed For
Civil Case
04/05/2007 - ORDER MOTION
FOR CONTINUANCE IS
DENIED AS MOOT. ON
NOVEMBER 16, 2006, THE
COURT DISMISSED THE
CASE FOR FAILURE TO
STATE A CLAIM
PURUSUANT TO 28
04/13/2007 - MOTION FOR
PRO SE. (SEE 05-2288, PAPER
NO. 50).(ac, ) (Entered:
04/23/2007 - ORDER THAT
CONTINUANCE IS DENIED
AS MOOT. SIGNED BY
JUDGE MARY A.
MCLAUGHLIN ON
04/16/07.04/16/07 ENTERED
AND COPIES MAILED
04/26/2007 - ORDER THAT
PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR
AN EX PARTE MEETING IS
DENIED. SIGNED BY JUDGE
MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON
04/25/07.
05/05/2007 - ADDENDUM TO
COMPLAINT BY STANLEY J.
CATERBONE., PRO SE.(ac,)
(Entered: 05/07/2007)
Federal False Claims Act
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
October 18, 2006 - MOTION for Civil Litigation Hours

Leave to Proceed in forma
pauperis filed by STANLEY J.
CATERBONE.AFFIDAVIT.(ks,)
(Entered: 10/19/2006)
October 18, 2006 - Filed Civil
Action re Obstruction of Justice
and RICO
November 17, 2006 - ORDER
THAT MOTION FOR LEAVE
TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. IT IS
FURTHER ORDERED THAT
PLAINTIFF SHALL AMEND
HIS COMPLAINT SO AS TO
November 17, 2006 - ORDER
THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION
FOR CONTINUANCE IS
GRANTED. THE CLERK OF
COURT MARK THIS" ACTION
CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL
PURPOSES
AND
PLACE
THE
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page
205
507
34
31
of 44
221
523
50
Credit Amn
3,875.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
8.00
125.00
1,000.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
2/12/08 at 09:15:51.30
Page: 17a
Sales Journal
Date
6/1/07
Invoice
Customer ID
06-3955
Line Description
Item Description
Qty
November 17, 2006 - Complaint

against DEFENDANTS
MAYNARD HAMILTON, JR,
DENISE COMMINS, RICHARD
H. SIMMS, STEVEN MYLIN,
WILLIAM G. REUTER,
MICHAEL SMITH, RONALD
January 19,2007 - ORDER
THAT THE
ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE
SHALL REMAIN IN CIVIL
SUSPENSE UNTIL 4/19/07.
1/19/07 ENTER
April 3, 2007 - ADDENDUM
TO COMPLAINT filed by
STANLY J. CATERBONE. Cert,
of Service. (PRO SE) (pr, )
(Entered: 04/03/2007)
April 13, 2007 - STANLY J.
CATERBONE'S MOTION FOR
CONTINUANCE (#50 in
06-cv-4154).(fdc) (Entered:
04/13/2007)
CONTINUANCE IS
GRANTED. THIS CASE
SHALL REMAIN IN CIVIL
SUSPSENSE UNTIL 6/19/07.
MCLA
THE PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST
FOR AN EX PARTE MEETING
IS DENIED. SIGNED BY
JUDGE MARY A.
4/26/07 ENTERED AND
COPIES
May 7, 2007 - Addendum to
Complaint by STANLY J.
CATERBONE (#1 1 in
06-CV-4154). (fdc) (Entered:
05/07/2007)
June 18, 2007 - Motion For
Continuance
June 25, 2007 - Motion For
Continuance Granted, Provide
Status by August 31, 2007
Caterbone v. Wenger et al
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
September 6, 2007 - CIVIL

CASE DOCKETED Notice filed
by Stanley J. Caterbone.
RECORD, received, (clc
September 8, 2007 - LEGAL
DIVISION LETTER SENT
advising appeal has been listed
for possible dismissal, (zm)
September 18, 2007 Hours Billed For Civil
APPEARANCE from Attorney
Christopher S. Underhill on
behalf of Appellee Manheim Twp
Pol, filed, (clc)
September 18, 2007 Hours Billed For Civil
APPEARANCE from Attorney
Stephanie Carfley on behalf of
Appellee Fulton Bank, filed, (clc)
September
18, 2007
- 508
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page
206
35
32 of 44
221
523
50Hours Billed For Civil
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on
Credit Amn
4,750.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00Tuesday
125.00November
125.00
Wednesday
Saturday,
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
2/12/08 at 09:15:51.36
Page: 18a
Sales Journal
Date
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on
behalf of Appellee Fulton Bank,
filed, (clc)
September 19, 2006 - FOLLOW
UP LETTER to Robert W.
Hallinger, Walter H. Swayze,
Patricia Baxter, George M.
Gowen and Stuart A. Weiss
requesting the following do
September 25, 2006 APPEARANCE from Attorney
William H. Howard on behalf of
Appellee Avalon Pol Dept, filed.
(Iwc)
September 25, 2006 APPEARANCE from Attorney
William H. Howard on behalf of
Appellee Avalon Pol Dept, filed.
(Iwc)
September 29, 2006 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on
behalf of Appellee Comm Natl
Bank, filed, (clc)
October 2, 2006 APPEARANCE from Attorney
Robert W. Hallinger on behalf of
Appellee Lancaster Cty Prison,
filed, (clc)
October 11, 2006 - RESPONSE
to Legal Division letter for
possible dismissal, on behalf of
Appellee Manheim Twp Pol,
filed. Certificate of Service dated
10/6/06
December 1, 2006 - Notice
received from district court that
IFF has been granted to Stanley J.
Caterbone . (clc)
April 30, 2007 - Document filed
by Appellant titled "Addendum to
Appeal, filed, (clc)
Appeal Order Amend 2288
Compl
6/1/07
6/1/07
06-5117
7003
CI-07-03924
September 1, 2007 - Notice of

Appeal to U.S. District Court
Anita Brody
September 10, 2007 - Judge
Fehling Memorandum and
Opinion Filed
November 27, 2007 - PP&L
Motion To Dismiss to Judge
Anita Brody
May 31, 2007 - Judge Anita
Brody Reply Letter to M Henry
PP&L Attorney
May 31, 2007 - Appellant
Response to Appellee Motion to
Dismiss
June 18, 2007 - Judge Anita
Brody ORDER Denial, Move to
Dissmiss Appeal File Appeal to
Third Circuit within 60 days
Chapter 11 PP&L Dismissal
Appe
Item Description
Qty
Credit Amn
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
2,375.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
6.00
125.00
750.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
May 1, 2007 - File Complaint and Civil Litigation Hours

In Forma Pauperis Application
May 4, 2007 - IFP Denied, Error Civil Litigation Hours
in Caption
May
7, 2007- Refile
In Forma
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page
207
509
36
33 of 44
221
523
Pauperis Application
2,375.00
8.00
125.00
1,000.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00Tuesday
125.00November
250.00
Wednesday
Saturday,
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
2/12/08 at 09:15:51.47
Page: 19a
Sales Journal
Date
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Pauperis Application
May 9, 2007 - In Forma Pauperis
Granted
May 24, 2007 - Entry of
Appearence Samuel Cortes of
Rothschild, LLP for Sam
Lombardo
May 29, 2007 - Entry of
Appearence and Answer from
May 31, 2007 - Preliminary
Objections filed by Samuel
Cortes for Lombardo
June 25, 2007 - File Motion For
Continuance
June 29, 2007 - ORDER by
Judge Cullen Denial of Motion
for Continuance Requested to
Resubmit with Reason
July 19, 2007 - Request for
Interogatories and Request to
Produce Documents Filed by
July 24, 2007 - File Answer to
Office Max Interrogatories
Item Description
Qty
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
1.00
125.00
Caterbone v. Lombardo/Office M
6/17/07
6/17/07
05-2288
05-23059
Sept 6, 2006 Notice of Appeal

Third Circuit Court of Appeals
Case No. 06-3955 Legal Work
Done On Pro Se Civil Appeal
Case
Sept 8, 2006 Letter from Third
Circuit Legal Division re
Jurisdictional Dismissal
Sept 18 2006 Research and
Analysis Notice of Appearences
Fultong Bank, Manheim Twp
Police; Fulton Bank Disclosure
Statement
Sept 25 2006 Notice of
Appearence Avalon Police Dept
Sept 25 2006 Notice of
Appearance Mellon Bank;
Disclosure Statement
Sept 28 2006 Reponse to Legal
Division by Fulton Bank in
support of dismissal
Oct 2 2006 Notice of Appearance
Oct 11 2006 Reponse to Legal
Division by Manheim Twp Police
Chris Underhill in support of
dismissal
Dec 1 2006 In Forrma Pauperis
Application Granted
Apr 30 2007 Addendum to
Appeal filed; Letter to
McLaughlin, DARPA, Parula
Property Stolen
Credit Amn
125.00
3,250.00
10.00
125.00
1,250.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
Apr 30 2007 Notice of Appeal to Chapter 11 Appeal Ho

Thrid Circuit from Chapter 11 re
Amend Filing Date Case No.
07-2150
May 10 2007 Application to
procedd In Forma Pauperis Filed
May 21 2007 Motion For Recusal Chapter 11 Appeal Ho
ofReceivables
Judge RendellPage
Filed
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Page510
208
37
34 of 44
221
523
50
4,500.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
2/12/08 at 09:15:51.58
Page: 20a
Sales Journal
Date
6/17/07
Invoice
Customer ID
05-23059
Line Description
Item Description
Qty
Credit Amn
May 29 2007 Order Granted for

In Forma Pauperis; Proceed to 3
Judge Panel for Review to
Continue
June 8 2007 Motion to Dismiss
by Department of Justice
(Appellee) by J. Adams
2.00
125.00
250.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
1,750.00
June 2 2005 Order Granting

Application To Pay Filing Fees In
Installments. (Related Doc # 4);
June 13 2005 Order Dismissing
Case for Debtor's Failure to
Timely File Required Documents.
(P., Cathy) (Entered: 06/13/2005)
2.00
125.00
250.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
June 21 2005 Summary of

Schedules, Schedules A-J,
Statement of Financial Affairs
Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone .
(Attachments: # J. Statement of
Financial Affai
06/21/2005 Summary of
Schedules, Schedules A-J,
Statement of Financial Affairs
(Attachments: # J. Statement of
Financial Aff
07/01/2005 Appellant
Designation of Contents For
Inclusion in Record On Appeal,
and Findings of Fact Filed by
Stanley J. Caterbone .
(Attachments: # I Findi
09/21/2005 District Court Order
entered within Civil Action #
05-CV-3689 Notice of Appeal
Regarding 6/13/2005 Order
Dismissing
10/05/2005 Final Order By
District Court Judge Anita B.
Brody - RE: Notice of Appeal
(CA-05-3689) Regarding
6/13/2005 Order Dismissing Ca
11/08/2005 Notice of Hearing to
Show Cause why this case should
not be not be Dismissed for
Debtor's Failure to Timely Pay
Filing Fees for Chapter 1
3.00
125.00
375.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
7.00
125.00
875.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
11/16/2005 Meeting of Creditors Chapter 11 Hours Bill

. 341 (a) meeting to be held on
12/15/2005 at 12:30 PM at
3cnfrm - 3rd Floor Conference
Room. Last day to oppose dis
11/29/2005 Drive to Reading to
Final Installment Payment.
Receipt Number 20073978, Fee
Amount $839.00. (P., Cathy)
(Entered: 11/29/2005) Drive to
Reading Co
Work Done On Pro Se Chapter
11 Case
12/15/2005 Response dated
12/14/2005 Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbone Regarding HEMAP
Appeal Hearing Request. (P.,
Cathy)
(Entered:Page
12/16/2005)
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page511
209
38
35 of 44
221
523
50
2.00
125.00
250.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
2/12/08 at 09:15:51.63
Page: 21a
Sales Journal
Date
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Item Description

Litigation
Jan 9 2006 File Order Entered
that if a certificate of service of
the amended schedules or
amended matrix is not filed
within 20 days from the date of
this orde
01/23/2006 Certificate of Service Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone RE: Amended Schedules and
Response to Creditor Status
Order (related document(s)27).
(P.,
01/24/2006 Motion for Relief
from Stay. Fee Amount $150,
Filed by Fulton Bank
Represented by SHAWN M.
LONG (Counsel). Objections due
by 2/8/2006. (A
01/30/2006 Amended Schedule F Chapter 11 Hours Bill
(creditor added) Filed by Stanley
J. Caterbone ; Receipt Number
20074148, Fee Amount $26.00
(P., Cathy) (Entered: 01/31/2006)
01/30/2006 Advanced Media
Group Income Statements for the
year 2005 Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbone . (Attachments: # !_
Continuation of Reports) (P.,
Cathy)
Filed by Stanley J. Caterbone RE: Amended Schedules (related
document(s)35). (P., Cathy)
(Entered: 02/02/2006)
02/02/2006 Debtor's Response to Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Motion of Fulton Bank for Relief
From Stay ; Response and
Exhibits thereto Filed by Stanley
J. Caterbone (related do
02/10/2006 Monthly Operating
Report for Filing for the month of
January 2006 Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbone . (P., Cathy) (Entered:
02/10/2006)
02/21/2006 Hearing Held on 31
Motion for Relief from Stay Filed
by Fulton Bank Represented by
SHAWN M. LONG (Counsel).
Matter Taken Under Advisement.
(S., B
02/23/2006 Order Granting
Motion for Relief from Stay
Regarding Property 220 Stone
Hill Road, Conestoga, PA Filed
by Fulton Bank Represented by
SHAWN M. LON
03/20/2006 Debtor Request for Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Hearing, and Certificate of
Service thereto Filed by Stanley
J. Caterbone . (P., Cathy)
(Entered: 03/20/2006)
11 Case
03/31/2006 Order DENYING
Debtor's (Second) Request for
Hearing because nothing is
pending before this Court on
which
a hearing Page
might
be512
held,of 44
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
210
39
36
221
523
50
(related d
Qty
Credit Amn
6.00
150.00
900.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
25.00
125.00
3,125.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
12.00
125.00
1,500.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
6.00
150.00
900.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
2/12/08 at 09:15:51.74
Page: 22a
Sales Journal
Date
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Item Description
Qty
2.00
125.00
250.00

Debtor's Motion to Stay All
Proceedings (Request for
Continuance) because nothing is
presently pending before this
Court that would
05/03/2006 Order (copy)
entered in District Court within
Appeal CV-06-1538 ; Ordered
that the Appellant's motion for
continuance is Denied as Moot
(con
05/30/2006 05/30/2006
05/30/2006 Motion to Convert
Case to Chapter 7 . Fee Amount
$15.00, Motion to Dismiss Case
Filed by United States Trustee
Represente
Regarding Documents sent to US
Trustee's Office. (P., Cathy)
(Entered: 06/08/2006)
06/29/2006 Hearing Held - RE:
Motion to Dismiss Case, or
Conversion of Case to Chapter 7
(related document(s),60).
**MATTER T
07/10/2006 Debtor's Request
for Hearing Transcripts, Praecipe
to Proceed in Forma Pauperis
(P., Cathy) (Entered: 07
07/17/2006 Final Order By
District Court Judge Anita B.
Brody Regarding Debtor's Notice
of Appeal (Civil Action
#06-1538) of Bankruptcy Order
dated 2/23/200
07/18/2006 Debtor's Request
(dated 7/14/2006) for Hearing
Transcripts, Praecipe to Proceed
in Forma Pauperis Filed by
Stanley J. Caterbone . (P., Cathy)
(En
07/20/2006 Memorandum In
Support of Motion to Dismiss
Dept of Justice Dave P. Adams
08/03/2006 Hearing Set re
Debtor's Request for Hearing
Transcripts, Praecipe to Proceed
in Forma Pauperis Filed by
Stanley J. Caterbone (related
document 67
08/16/2006 Motion Debtor
Request Continuance Filed by
Stanley J. Caterbone Represented
by Self(Counsel). (P., Cathy)
(Entered: 08/16/2006)
08/17/2006 Hearing Scheduled to Chapter 11 Hours Bill
provide court with difinitive
report status of Chapter 11 and to
address
questions
about 513
the
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page
211
40
37future
of 44
221
523
50
Heaing Notice Never Recieved
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
6.00
150.00
900.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
(related d
04/10/2006 Request for
Continuance of Chapter 11 Case
Filed'by Stanley J. Caterbone .
(P., Cathy) (Entered: 04/10/2006)
Credit Amn
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
2/12/08 at 09:15:51.85
Page: 23a
Sales Journal
Date
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Item Description
Heaing Notice Never Recieved

11 Case
08/25/2006 DOCKETED IN
ERROR: entered on main case,
should be on adversary- See
Adversary 06-2236***Attach
PDF Document: Copy of Notice
of Appeal
08/31/Order Entered that the
Bench Order Entered on today's
Record DENYING 67 Debtor's
Request (dated 7/6/2006) for
Hearing Transcripts, Praecipe to
Proceed IFP
09/27/2006 Notice of Briefing
Schedule issued by US District
Court - RE: Notice of Appeal
Civil Action 06-4212 (related
10/03/2006 Order Granting
United States Trustee's Motion to
Dismiss Case, (related
(Entered: 10/03/2006)
10/19/2006 Notice of Appeal to
District Court - RE: Order
entered 10/3/2006 Granting
United States Trustee's Motion to
Dismiss Case ; Notice of Appeal,
and
01/18/2007 Motion for Debtor's Chapter 11 Hours Bill
Request (dated 1/13/2007) for
Hearing Transcripts, Praecipe to
Proceed in Forma Pauperis Filed
by Stanley J. Caterbon
Motion for Debtor's (Second)
Request for Hearing Transcripts,
Praecipe to Proceed in Forma
Pauperis Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbone.
Pauperis Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbone.
02/05/2007 Updated Creditor
Matrix/Amendment to List of
Creditors (5 new names) Filed by
Stanley J. Caterbone (Neither
Amended Schedules nor Certific
02/05/2007 Application to
Waive Fee Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbone Represented by
Self(Counsel). (P., Cathy)
(Entered: 02/05/2007)
02/05/2007 Motion to
Reconsider Order DENYING
Pauperis ; M
Debtor's Motion to Reconsider
Order dated 1/19/2007 and
DENYING Debtor's Application
to Waive Fee. (related
document(s)105,
1Page514
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
212
41
38 of 44
221
523
50
Qty
Credit Amn
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
2/12/08 at 09:15:51.96
Page: 24a
Sales Journal
Date
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Item Description
Qty
02/09/2007 Letter Received from

Debtor Stanley J. Caterbone in
response to memorandum
regarding Local Rule 9014-3. (P.,
02/20/2007 Notice of Appeal to
District Court of Order entered
2/7/2007 DENYING Debtor's
Motion to Reconsider Order
DENYING Debtor's Application
to Wa
02/26/2007 Corrective Entry RE: Notice of Appeal of Order
DENYING Debtor's Motion to
Reconsider Order and Debtor's
Application to Waive Fee Filed
by Stanl
03/06/2007 Order Supplementing
Order of February 7, 2007,
pursuant to Local Bankruptcy
Rule 8001-1 (c)(related
document(s)K)6). (B., Keith)
(Entere
03/20/2007 District Court
Acknowledgement of receiving
Bankruptcy Appeal
(CA-07-1093) Signed by Deputy
Clerk Steve Tomas - RE: Notice
of Appeal to District
05/18/2007 Notice of Change of
Address Filed by Stanley J.
Caterbone . (P.,Cathy) (Entered:
05/18/2007) 05/18/2007
Operating Report/Balance
05/18/2007 Operating
port/Balance Sheet 5/31/2007,
Income Statement for 5 months
ending 5/31/2007, Aged
Receivables as of 5/31/2007 Filed
by Stanley
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
8.00
125.00
1,000.00
1.00
125.00

6/30/07
07-2151
April 30, 2007 - Bankruptcy Case Chapter 11 Appeal Ho

Docketed. Notice filed by
Stanley J. Caterbone. (clc)
May 10, 2007 - MOTION by
Appellant to proceed in forma
pauperis, filed, (clc)
May 10, 2007 - APPEARANCE
from Attorney Dave Adams on
behalf of Appellee Kelly B.
Stapleton, filed, (clc)
May 21, 2007 - MOTION by
Appellant for Request for
Recusal of Judge Rendell, filed.
Answer due 6/4/07. Certificate of
Service dated 5/18/07. (clc)
May 29, 2007 - ORDER (Clerk)
granting motion to proceed in
forma pauperis by Appellant.
The appeal will be submitted to a
panel for determination under 28
U.S.
June 8, 2007 - MOTION by
Appellee to dismiss appeal, filed.
Answer due 6/25/07. Certificate
of Service dated 6/8/07. (clc)
June 19, 2007 - Answer to
Motion to Dismiss by Appellant
Stanley
J. Caterbone
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page515
213
42
39 of 44
221
523
50
Credit Amn
125.00
23,825.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
8.00
125.00
1,000.00
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
2/12/08 at 09:15:52.02
Page: 25a
Sales Journal
Date
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Item Description
Qty
Caterbone v. U.S. Trustee

6/30/07
8/7/07
8/7/07
06-1538
1130 CD 2007
CI-07-00366
Credit Amn
2,500.00
June 9, 2006 - Notice of Appeal

to U.S. District Court Judge
Brody Appeal Fulton Bank Auto
-Stay
July 17, 2006 - Response to
Fulton Bank Answer to Appeal
August 5, 2006 - Judge Anity
Brody ORDER Appeal Denied
5.00
125.00
625.00
8.00
125.00
1,000.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
April 5, 2007 - Appeal Hearing

via Telephone at the Lancaster
County Assistance Office. CASE
NO. #360234927-002
April 10, 2007 - Prepare
supporting documents for appeal.
April 9, 2007 - ORDER, Denying
Appeal
April 26, 2007 - Final
Administrative Action Order,
DENYING BENEFITS
May 9, 2007 - Appeal Hearing
and Adjudication via Telephone
held at the Lancaster County
Assistance Office.
June 11, 2007 - Appeals Final
Decision/FAA
July 2, 2007 - ORDER Denying
Reconsideration
July 14, 2007 - Appeal to
Commonwealth Court
Rosen Appeals for Food Stamp
Benefits
Cooksey Appeals for Food
Stamps
Caterbone v. DPW Food Stamps
5.00
125.00
625.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
30.00
125.00
3,750.00
30.00
125.00
3,750.00
1,875.00
January 16, 2007 - File Civil

Action and In Forma Application
Caterbone v. Totaro, et al
January 23, 2007 - File Exhibits
to Complaint
January 23, 2007 - Appearence
by Stephanie Carfly of Barley
Snyder, LLP, for Fulton Bank
January 24, 2007 - ORDER In
Forma Pauperis DENIED for
Frivilous by Judge Allison
January 25, 2007 - Notice of Rule Civil Litigation Hours
236 Notice sent by Prothonetary
January 29, 2007 - Appeal for
Reconsideration to ORDER of
January 24, 2007 by Judge
Allison
February 8, 2007 - Preliminary
Objections filed by Stepanie
Carfly of Barley Snyder, LLP for
Fulton Bank
February 20, 2007 - Brief filed by Civil Litigation Hours
Stepanie Carfly of Barley Snyder,
LLP for Fulton Bank in support
of Preliminary Objections
February 21, 2007 - Judge
Allison ORDER DENIED
Appeal for Reconsideration
February 26, 2007 - Rule 236
Notice from Prothonatary of
ORDER dated January 24, 2007
which
was DENIED.
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page516
214
43
40 of 44
221
523
50
11,250.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
2/12/08 at 09:15:52.13
Page: 26a
Sales Journal
Date
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Item Description
Qty
February 28, 2007 - File

ANSWER to Fulton Bank's
March 9, 2007- Filing Fees
Remained Unpaid for 10 Days
after Rule 236 - Judgement of
Non Pros Filed by Prothonatary
March 12, 2007- Christine
Munion, Esq., files Entry of
Appearance for Donald Totaro,
Lancaster County
Commissioners, Lancaster
County Sheriff, Lancaster County
March 13, 2007 - Praecipe filed
to DEFENDANT FULTON
BANK'S PRELIMINARY
OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S
COMPLAINT TO THE COURT
FOR DISPOSITION WITH
CERTIFICATE OF SER
March 16, 2007 - Filed
Addendum to Defendants List
April 24, 2007 - Addendum to
Complaint filed
May 11, 2007 - Judgement-Non
Pros filed by Chrisine Munion for
Totaro as directed by Wenger,
Prothonotary
May 24, 2007 - Notice of Appeal
to Superior Court of the
Judgement of Non Pros
June 6, 2007 - Notice of Concise
Statement of Matters Complained
by June 21, 2007 by Judge
Allison
June 21, 2007 - Statement of
Matters Complained filed
July 2, 2007 - Response by
Fulton Bank on Statement of
Matters Complained
July 16, 2007 - OPINION filed
by Judge Paul K. Allison to
Superior Court
July 17, 2007 - Record Sent to
Superior Court by Lancaster
County Prothonatary 950 MDA
951 MDA
July 18, 2007 - ORDER from
Superior Court DISMISS 950 &
951
July 24, 2007 - Record Returned
from the Superior Court 950 &
951 Memorandum Filed
5.00
125.00
625.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
Obstruction of Justice - EI
8/9/07
CI-07-00150
January 8, 2007 - (Emergency)

for emergency food stamp
benefits and other benefits filed
by stanley j. Caterbone, plaintiff,
pro se. And affidavit of financial
January 9, 2007 - Filed: and now, Civil Litigation Hours
jan 8, 2007, upon consideration
of defendant's request to proceed
in forma pauperis,it is ordered
that such request is granted
January 16, 2007 - Praecipe for
Appearance by Diana Clark, for
the Pennsylvania Department of
Welfare
January
29, 2007Page
-Page
Preliminary
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
215
517
44
41 of 44
221
523
Objections Filed by Diana Clark
Credit Amn
250.00
7,375.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00Tuesday
125.00November
250.00
Wednesday
Saturday,
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
2/12/08 at 09:15:52.24
Page: 27a
Sales Journal
Date
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Objections Filed by Diana Clark
of DPW
January 30, 2007 - Brief in
Support of Preliminary
Objections filed by Diana Clark
and DPW
February 15, 2007 - File Answer
to Preliminary Objections
May 29, 2007 - Notice of
Appearance Before Business
Judge for Food Stamps to
Reinaker, Recusal
May 30, 2007 - Notice of
Appearance before Business
Judge, Judge Farina, refused to
hear case
Emergency Food Stamps
8/9/07
CI-07-00019
January 2, 2007 - To proceed

informa pauperis with affidavit of
financial service filed by
Caterbone, pro se. In support of
petition to set aside sale
January 2, 2007 - Caption
Caterbone v. Fulton Bank,
Lancaster County Sheriff
Department
January 4, 2007 - In Forma
Pauperis GRANTED by Judge
Dennis E. Reinaker
January 5, 2007 - Addition to
Compliant (Please Add To
Complaint)
January 31, 2007 - Response Of
fulton bank to stanley j.
Caterbone's petition to set aside
sale of real estate. Filed by:
shawn m. Long, esq. Certificate
of ser
January 31, 2007 - Notice of
Meeting Before Business Judge
Michael Georgelis filed by
Shawn Long
February 1, 2007 - Meeting
before Judge Georgelis and
ORDER TO DISMISS
PETITION DENIED
February 6, 2007 - Reply to
Response of Fulton Bank
February 6, 2007 - Notice of
DENIAL to all parties
February 20, 2007 - From james
d. Mccullough, deputy
prothonotary, superior court of
pennsylvania. Returned herein is
the notice of appeal received in
the proth
Item Description
Qty
1.00
125.00
125.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2,500.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
3.00
125.00
375.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
2.00
125.00
Petition To Set Aside Sale

8/9/07
CI-06-02271
Credit Amn
March 8, 2006 - In mortgage

foreclosure filed by shawn m
long esq(ma). The mortgage was
recordedin the office of the
recorder of deeds of and for
lancaster coun
April 11, 2006 - Complaint. Filed Civil Litigation Hours
by shawn m. Long, esq.
Reinstated as 1.directed by
randall o. Wenger, prothonotary.
(2Receivables
copies to atty,Page
1Page
copy 518
of45
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
216
42 of 44
221
523
50
complaint wit
250.00
3,875.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
2/12/08 at 09:15:52.35
Page: 28a
Sales Journal
Date
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
Item Description
Qty
1.00
125.00
125.00
5.00
125.00
625.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
August 8, 2006 - Served Def.

Stanley j. Caterbone, personally,
with a notice of sale and/or
handbill at lancaster county
courthouse, 50 north duke st
August 11, 2006 - In Forma
Pauperis With praecipe to
proceed in forma pauperis
presented
to court
and court
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page
217
519
46
43 of 44
221
523
50
enters order granting in forma
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
complaint wit
May 1, 2006 - Complaint Served,
Civil action complaint upon
stanley caterbone by personal
service at lancaster county
sheriff's office,50 north duke
street, lan
May 8, 2006 - Answer to
Complaint filed
June 6, 2006 - Brief In support
of plaintiff's motion for judgment
on the pleadings. Filed by shawn
m. Long, esq. Certificate of
service of same.
June 6, 2006 - Motion by Fulton
for judgement on the pleadings
filed by Shawn M. Long
June 28, 2006 - Praecipe filed to
assign Plaintiff fulton bank's
motion for summary judgment to
the court for disposition as
unopossed with certific
June 29, 2006 - ORDER Filed:
and now, this 29th day of june,
2006, upon consideration of
plaintiff's motion for judgment on
the pleadings, as well as
defendants
July 20, 2006 - Enter judgment
on behalf of plaintiff and against
defendant, stanley j. Caterbone in
the amount of $97,425.07, plus
continuing interest after ma
July 25, 2006 - Filed Notice of
Appeal to Superior Court Case
No.
July 28, 2006 - A hearing on the
defendant's application for in
forma pauperis status will be held
in curtroom 5 at 9:00 a.m. on
wednesday, august 9, 2006. By t
July 31, 2006 - Filed. Writ issued.
Affidavit of non-military service.
Principal: $88,568.53; interest to
03/02/2006 at a rate of $14.56 per
diem: $4,442.96; ne
July 31, 2006 - Affidavit - rule
3129 7/31/2006 Concerning the
real property located at 220 stone
hill road a/k/a lot #5 stone hill
road, township of conestog
July 31, 2006 - Notice of
7/31/2006 Sheriff's sale of real
property to stanley j. Caterbone at
220 stone hill road, conestoga, pa
17516. Filed by shawn m. Long
August 1, 2006 - 220 stone hill
road, a/k/a lot #5 stone hill rd.,
conestoga, conestoga township
56 December 20, 2006. Received
check from barley snyder i
Credit Amn
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
2/12/08 at 09:15:52.40
Page: 29a
Sales Journal
Date
Invoice
Customer ID
Line Description
enters order granting in forma
pauperis status. Mich
August 11, 2006 - Filed. The
defendant has appealed my june
29, 2006 order granting the
plaintiff's motion for judgment on
the pleadings. He is directed to
file
August 17, 2006 - Of notice of
sheriff's sale by mail to
lienholders on aug. 11, 2006.
Filed by shawn m. Long, esq. Of
the notice of sheriff sale upon
defenda
August 31, 2006 - Served Writ of
Execution
September 5, 2006-OPINION
Pursuant to pa.r.a.p. 1025(a)
filed. By the court: michael a.
Georgelis, judge. Copies w/236
notice sent to: stanley j.
Caterbone, pro
September 6, 2006-The superior
court of pennsylvania - no. 1463
mda 2006. Copy of the list of
record documents sent to: stanley
j. Caterbone, pro se and shawn m
January 8, 2006-Certified copy of
Order from the superior court of
pennsylvania - no. 1463 mda
2006 filed. And now, this fourth
day of january, 2007
Fulton v. Caterbone Foreclosur
Item Description
Qty
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
2.00
125.00
250.00
1.00
125.00
125.00
4.00
125.00
500.00
Total
Advanced
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
Media
MEDIA
Group
Litigation
GROUP
Pro SeAccounts
Pro
Valuation
Billings
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page520
218
47
44 of 44
221
523
50
Credit Amn
5,375.00
284,327.50
284,327.50
Wednesday
Tuesday
Saturday,
November
December
November27,
30,
7, 2015
2016
No.
OPEN
16-cv-4941
112
113
114
115
Case No.
*
*
16-cv-4014
15-03984
14-02559
116
05-2288
117
06-4650
118
08-02982
119
06-4734
*
16-CV-49
U.S. District Court 16-4014

Filing
Appeal
Judgment
Court
Case Description
United States Federal Courts
NEXT EVENT DUE
transferred from U.S.

Stan Caterbone Habeus Corpus District Court, MIDDLE
for Freedom, Liberty and the
DISTRICT in Harrisburg,
Pursuit of Happiness
Case No. 1751
CATERBONE v. The United
Docketed July 29, 2016
States of America, et.al.,
Assigned to Judge Smith
CATERBONE HABEUS
LAMBERT HABEUS
CATERBONE v. Lancaster
County Prison, et.al.,
CATERBONE v. Randal Wenger,
et.al.,
Bureau of Police
Federal False Caims Act - ISC
Whistleblowing
Chapter 11 Appeal from 16July 19, 2016 Hearing,
10517
Allentown, PA
Judges
Court Venue
Date
Date
Defendants
Description
Value
Judge Lisa Rambo in MIDDLE

DISTRICT
Edward Smith
Curtis Joyner
Paul Diamond
Mary McLaughlin
Mary McLaughlin
Mary McLaughlin
Mary McLaughlin
Edward Smith
U.S. DISTRICT COURT for the

MIDDLE DISTRICT HARRISBURG
120
16-cv-1751
PETITION FOR HABEUS

CORPUS
J.C. No. 03-16-90005
Office of the Circuit Executive,

Third Circuit
Lambert Judicial Complaint;
15-3400 and 16-1149
121
122
J.C. No. 03-16-900042
Judge Smith, et.al.,

U.S. Bankruptcy Eastern District
16-10517
Chapter 11 To Appeal 16-cv-49
123
Transferred to U.S. District

Court Eastern District 161751
FINAL ORDER on June 24,

2016 DISMISSAL
Fedex Delivery on July 29,
2016
Richard E. Fehling
U.S. SUPREME COURT
124
Case No. 16-6822
16-1149 LAMBERT HABEUS
Respondents have until

December 12, 2016 for
BRIEFS
U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals
125
126
15-3400
127
16-1149
128
129
16-1001
15-1124
15-03984 CATERBONE HABEUS

14-02559 LAMBERT ATTY
130
07-4475
06-4650 REVERSE DISMISSAL
131
07-4474
05-2288; REVERSE DISMISSAL

16-MC-2016 Chapter 11
Appeal-Judge Smith
16-3284
132
134
1219 EDA 2016

1164 EDA 2016
135
1561 MDA 2015
133
1519 MDA 2016

136
495 MAL 2016
137
496 MAL 2016
138
139
353 MT 2016
140
354 MT 2016
108 MAL 2016
PENNSYLVANIA SUPERIOR
Preliminary Emergency
Injunction
Kathleen Kane Amicus
County Residents
Bureau of Police
PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME
1561 CATERBONE v.
Lancaster County Residents
1915 CATERBONE v.
Lancaster Bureau of Police
1561 CATERBONE v.
Lancaster County Residents
1915 CATERBONE v.
Lancaster Bureau of Police
Kathleen Kane Amicus
Judge Michael Fisher

Signed Former PA
Attorney General
Prosecuted Lambert
Signed Former PA
Attorney General
Prosecuted Lambert
Signed Former PA
Attorney General
Prosecuted Lambert
Sloviter, Barry, and

NyGaard Circuit Judges
Sloviter, Barry, and
NyGaard Circuit Judges
Edward Smith
Next Event Lower Record by

September 23, 2016
July 28, 2016 Citations Due

Plus $85.00 Fee
July 28, 2016 Citations Due
Plus $85.00 Fee
PENNSYLVANIA JUDICIAL
CONDUCT BOARD
141
2016-462 (Brown)
142
Judge Leonard Brown III

Case No. 16-05815 Preliminary
Emergency Injunction
Docketed August 4, 2016
DAUPHIN COUNTY COURT OF

COMMON PLEAS
143
144
145
146
147
*
*
CP-22-SA-0000067-2016
MJ-12104-TR0000911-2016
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016
Summary Appeal Albert
Missed Hearing Monday

June 27, 2016 Deleted it
from calender
IFP APPROVED
LANCASTER COUNTY MDJ

MJ-02204-TR-00019812016 No Parking
Permitted
Summary Appeal
MJ02301-TR-00000281- Summary Appeal CP-36-SA2016 Left Turn, Accident 0000219-2016
MJ-02101-TR-00022422016 Following Too
Close
July 27, 2016 2:30pm

Witkonis
Charges Dismissed by
Lancaster City Police
CASES FROM 2005 TO 2014

UNTIED STATES FEDERAL
COURTS
U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District of
Pennsylvania
1
CA 06-1538
No. 05-23059
Judge Anita Brody
Fulton Bank Auto Stay

U.S. Bankruptcy Chapter 11
Petition
They want to discharge or convert

to Chapter 7
Fed Court of Appeals
Judge Twardowski to Richard

E. Fehling
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Pro
Valuation
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page521
219
48 of 523
221
50
3/3/2006
5/23/2005
Fulton Bank
Appeal from . Eastern Dist. Bankruptcy Court

Fulton Stay
Filed May 23, 2005
Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Petition, Dismissed

June 13,2005 Reinstated Oct 27, 2005 Judge
Brody
Lost appeal
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
30, 2016
No.
OPEN
Date
Date
Defendants
Description
5/16/2005
Awarded Appeal
Judge Anita Brody
U.S. District Ct of Appeals
6/13/2005
US Dept of Justice Trusee Order Reversed of Judge Twardowski
See **
Judge Anita Brody
8/23/2006
Appeal Chapter 11 Brief Due by Sept 6
RICO Complaint
Judge Anita Brody

Judge Mary McLaughlin

8/25/2006
10/25/2006
Wenger, et al
Judge Mary McLaughlin
U.S. Attorney General then

U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District
US Dist Court Eastern
District
10/1/2006
ISC/Ferranti/US Attorney
General Gonzales
CA-05-3689
CA 06-5117
Chapter 11 Dismissal
Appealed Order to have Brief due by
Sept 06 by Judge Fehling
Appeal Hearing for PP&L did not get
notice until day of Hearing
06-cv-4154
06-CV-4650
06-cv-4734
Federal False Caims Act - ISC

Whistleblowing
06-cv-5138
Habeas Corpus Lanc County Prison
Case No.
Court Venue
US Dist Court Eastern

District
Judges
Fulton Bank; Mellon

Bank; Stone Harbor
Police; Lancaster County
Sheriffs; Avalon Police;
Lancaster County Prison;
Manheim Township
Police/
Sealed Federal Case 1987 to Present
NEXT EVENT DUE
Judge Mary McLaughlin- Stuart A.

Weiss, Esquire
George M. Gowen, 111, Esquire
Cozen O'Connor-Howard L. Kelin,
Esquire
Kegel, Kelin, Almy & GrimmGeorge T. Brubaker, Esquire
Need to Amend and talk to Tony, As Hartman, Underhill & Brubaker,
soon as PP&L turns electric back
LLC-Stephanie Carfley, Esquire
on and get back in Office with
Robert W. Hallinger
Drivers License**
Appel & Yost LLP
05-cv-2288

Filing
Appeal
Judgment
Court
Case Description
Case No.
U.S. Third Circuit Court of

Appeals
Notes
Judges
Court Venue
Filed on 05/16/05 after abby & Lanc Dist Atty

meeting; Judge McLaughlin found at least 15
causes of actions without my amended appeal;
must only cure statute of limitations
deficiencies; RICO and National Security
Est $50 to $350
Issues
Million
Appeal PP&L Order Only owe about $700.00
15% to 25% of Assets recovered in 1991 with

accumulated interest; estimated $300 Million
reclaimed
Date
Date
Defendants
Description
07-cv-2151
Appeal Order to 06-5012 CH 11

Dismissal by US DOJ Trustee
See **
Third Circuit Court of

Appeals
4/13/2007
US Dept of Justice Trusee Appeal Judge McLaughlin Due by Sept 6
11
06-cv-3955
Appeal Order to Amend Complaint by

Sept 15 2006 05-2288
See **

Appeals
8/25/2006
Appeal Judge McLaughlin Due by Sept 6
12
06-cv-3054
Appeal Brody PP&L

Appeals
07-cv-4474
Appeal McLaughlin 05-2288 Oct 24

Dismissal

Appeals
11/23/2007
Appeal McLaughlin 06-4650 Oct 24

Dismissal

Appeals
Court Venue
11/23/2007
Date
Non Assigned
Non Assigned
PA Common Pleas
PA Common Pleas
Non Assigned
PA Common Pleas
14
Y
Y
07-cv-4475
Case No.
15
16
CI-05-03644
CI-06-07376
17
CI-06-03403
18
CI-06-03401
Notes
PA Court of Common Pleas

S Caterbone AMG PH v. D Anthon Eden
Resort
Must Collect
S Caterbone v. Mike Caterbone
Defaulted
S Caterbone v. Thomas Grasell
Defaulted
Judges
Judge Madenspacher
reasgined it to Judge Georgelis
PA Common Pleas
so he said
S Caterbone v. Conestoga Police
Est $45 Million

plus 5% Annual
Interest from
1992
11/20/2006
10
13
Value
Value
Lanc Co, Fulton, et al
4/26/2005
8/2/2006
Wenger, et al
Defendants
Drew Anthon, East of
Eden
Mike Caterbone
Defaulted; filed for claim; McNeese atty

Libel,slander, email; medicine for money
4/11/2006
Thomas Grassel
Sexual Harassment filed from last June 2005
4/11/2006
All physical abuse, abuse of power, theft

SRPD;Fiorill,Busser,Fedor of$750 cash on Apr 5, 302 document, hospital
Date
Description
Value
26.000.00
$10,000 +
$100,000.00
$300,000.00
19
CI-06-03349
Hospital
Defualted, May move to Federal
Non Assigned
PA Common Pleas
4/10/2006
Illegal 5 day hospitalization Apr 5 to 10th

Lancaster General
Charged $9889.00 by LGH; Fabricated 302
HospitalDr. Emily Preston document;Officer Fedor/Busser
20
CI-06-07330
S Caterbone AMG v. Harleysville
Defualted
Non Assigned
PA Common Pleas
8/1/2006
Harleysville Insurance
21
CI-O6-04939
S Cat AMG v Pflumm,Stabley,Mike
Never Recorde by Prothonetary
Non Assigned
PA Common Pleas
5/24/2006
Dave, Mike, Brett, AlleyKat Libel,slander, IFP Denied/Note Recorded
22
CI-06-02271
Foreclosure
Appeal Superior Ct
Non Assigned
PA Common Pleas
3/8/2006
Fulton Mortgage Foreclosure
23
CI-06-07188
S Caterbone AMG v. PPL Electric
Remove to Ch 11
Non Assigned
PA Common Pleas
7/26/2006
PP&L Electric
Illegal Service Interuption, Business damage
24
CI-06-06658
S Caterbone AMG v. PennDOT
Appeal Superior Ct
Non Assigned
PA Common Pleas
7/14/2006
PennDOT Drivers License Appeal Drivers License Suspension
9/2/2006
Illegal Drivers License

Siezure
Drivers License Under Appeal, no authority,

pulled me over in Lancaster City Jurisdiction
took Honda to Towing Yard St. Dennis in
Mountville $25 per day
Y. Caterbone
DJ Sheryl Hartman 07/11/05 Hearing
$4,958.00
Chapter 11 Illegal Interuption of Service
$5,000.00
S Caterbone v. Lancaster General
Non Payment of Insurance Claims due

$7500.00 for damaged and stolen items
$1,000,000.00
$7900 plus
damages
Fulton Bank v. S Caterbone
S Caterbone AMG v. M. Schaefer
CI-06-08490
Non Assigned
PA Common Pleas
Won and Collected
DJ Sheryl Hartman
District Court 02-1-01
Awaiting Verdict from July 20th,

2006
MDJ Ballentine
6/27/2006
Comcast;Susan Gibson
PA Common Pleas
PA Common Pleas
1/2/2007
1/8/2007
Addendum 01/05/2007
PA Common Pleas
1/16/2007
PA Common Pleas
Court Venue
5/7/2007
Date
Millersvill Boro Police Dept
25
26
27
CV-0000207-05
1250 Renovations Payment
28
Cv-160-06
29
30
CI-07-00019
CI-07-00150
S Cat AMG v Comcast

Emergency Petition Set Aside Stone
Hill Road Sheriff Sale
31
CI-07-00366
32
CI-07-03924
Case No.
Emergency Petition Food Stamps

Emergency Injuncion
Obstruction,Fraud,Embezzlement
Caterbone v Lombardo & Office Max
Notes
PA Superior Court
Judges
Date
Defendants
33
1463 MDA 2006
Fulton Bank v. S. Caterbone
34
1462 MDA 2006
S Caterbone v. PennDOT
Judge Georgelis
Judge Cullen to Judge
Georgelis?
35
1461 MDA 2006
S. Caterbone v. S Regional Police
Judge Allison
855 MDA 2007
Comm of PA v Caterbone Fiorill
Judge Reinaker
37
951 MDA 2007
Caterbone v Totaro 00366 May 11

Judement
Judge Cullen
06-00366 PA Superior Court
38
950 MDA 2007
Judge Cullen
06-00366 PA Superior Court
Judge Farina
CP-36-CR-0002843-06
1/4/2007
Bezzard, East Lampeter
CP-22-MD 0000090-2007
PA Superior Court
3/9/2007
MDJ Smith, Dauphin Cty
CI-06-03349
8/30/2007
39
41
42
125 MDA 2007

435 MDA 2007
40
Y
43
44
45
$5,000.00
$50,000.00
District Justice
CI-06-02271 PA Superior
Court
Court
Court
SA-0160-06 PA Superior
Court
36
$97,000.00
1565 MDA 2007
1097 MDA 2007

1103 MDA 2007
2052 MDA 2007
2053 MDA 2007
No Opinion
Caterbone v Totaro 00366 Feb 24

Reconsider IFP Frivelous
Comm of PA v Caterbone East
Lampeter Judge Farina
Comm of PA v Caterbone Dauphin
County Harrisburg Airport Ticket
Hospital/Dr. Emily Pressley
Judge Cullen
Description
8/30/2006
Fulton Bank
Fulton Mortgage Dec Judge Georgelis
8/30/2006
PennDOT
Appeal Drivers License Suspen Georgelis
8/30/2006
S Regional Police Dept
Appeal Amend Due by August 20 2006
5/7/2007
Officer Fiorill
6/1/2006
Totaro, Farina, Cullen,etal
Value
4771-2006 Did not file brief

due to charges were
dismissed on Nov 1 2007
DUI Motion to Rescind Bail Supervision

Penn DOT
S-154-2007
S-158-2007
Georgelis
Georgelis
S-154-2007 Ballentine Insurance

S-158-2007 Simms Disorderly
Whiteford
Gjurich
Pennsylvania Supreme Court

46
248 MDA 2007
Superior Court Appeal 1463 MDA 1463
Court
2/5/2007
47
248 MDA Reconsideration
Court
7/20/2007
48
432 MT 2007
CI-07-00366
8/16/2007
49
433 MT 2007
CI-07-00366
8/16/2007
50
418 MT 2007
CP-22-MD 0000090-2007
PA Superior Court
8/8/2007
51
128 MM 2007
CP-22-MD 0000090-2007
PA Superior Court
8/8/2007
Commonwealth Court
52
1130 CD 2007
Caterbone v. DPW 360234927-003
April 26, 2007 ORDER

Rosen
53
1444 CD 2007
Caterbone v. DPW 360234927-003
July 5 2007 ORDER

Cooksey
8/2/2007
Docket/Brief Schedule
54
1442 CD 2007
Caterbone v. DPW 360234927-004A
July 10, 2007 ORDER

Rosen
8/2/2007
Case No.
55
56
57
58
CV-0000207-05
District Justice
Criminal District Justice - 27

Overturned
Harrasment; Letter about cat
Notes
Must File Appeal, Never received
Notice for Appeal Hearing Sept
2005Cat killed, I'm charged
Buser File Fleeing Arresting Officer
TR-0000245-06
Southern Regional Speeding &

InspectionHearing Jun 9th 9:00 am
TR-0003020-06
Reading Parking Meter & Inspection
Appeal No. SA159-2006
Judges
MDJ Eckert
MDJ Eckert to Hamilton
Court Venue

Date
Date
Defendants
Stan Caterbone
Stan Caterbone
Description
Tim Deacon 236 Stone Hill Road, My Cat
Killed,Appeal due on 06/10/05 paid
fine/Judicial Complaint to file /Southern
Regional file harrassment
Filed Fleeing charges on April 10, 2006
MDJ Eckert to Mylin
7/7/2006 Stan Caterbone
Change of Venue to Quarryville DJ by Judge

Eckert
Judge Thomas Xavios
Stan Caterbone
April 25th; 10:00 am 1259 North 10th Street,

Reading,PA 19604/610-373-4424
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Pro
Valuation
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page522
220
49 of 523
221
50
Value
$381.00
$187.50
$62.50
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
30, 2016
No.
OPEN
Case No.
Court
Case Description

Filing
Appeal
Judgment
NEXT EVENT DUE
59
TR-0000085-06
Southern Regional 2 Girls Walking

asked time when burglar in 220 Stone
Must file Appeal - All lies; burglary
Hill Went to Store for help
60
SP2421099
Vineland, NJ 856-691-4111
Judges
Court Venue
Date
Date
Defendants
Description
Stan Caterbone
2 Girls Walking fabricated harassment

chargesApril 2, 2006
Stan Caterbone
Was never in Vineland, New Jersey
Judge QuarryvilleJudge Eckert District Court 02-1-01
4/3/2006
Value
$247.50
Driving Violation, was never

39:4-97 stopped or saw any police
61
TR-0001010-06
Firorill Careless Driving
A complete lie, Fiorill perjury, off

duty
Stan Caterbone
$287.50
62
TR-0001011-06
Firorill Careless Driving to Close
A complete lie, took picture, he had

matress on top of car
Stan Caterbone
$75.00
Terroristic Threat Evacuate Bld
He was on bike, never went through

stop sign, he was the one at the
Police Station that did illusion trick MDJ Ballentine
Fabricated
MDJ Eckert to Commins

7/11/2006
4/3/2006
Stan Caterbone
Stan Caterbone
Whiteford illegal stop said went through stope

sign, but did not.
Wagon Wheel?
DUI;Resisting Arrest;Offensive
Weapons
.073 w/ mouth wash/I turned then

they put lights on, wood hatchet in
van
63
64
CR-0000141-06
65
66
TR-0002658-06
NT-0000220-06
67
CR-0000385-06
TR-0004428-06
68
TR-0002645-06
TR-0004428-06
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
Whiteford Insurance Card
8/8/2006
Stan Caterbone
See Notes; Fabricated charges by SRPD
Got mad when he was wrong about

IFP law, Right before Littering
Hearing, Lanc Cop would have
been made fool of
MDJ Simms
S
MDJ Simms

8/11/2006
5/26/2006
Stan Caterbone
Stan Caterbone
Simms wrong on IFP got mad arrested me

Parking Meter
Comcast v. S Caterbone
verdict on July 20 2006
MDJ Ballentine
4/12/2006
Stan Caterbone
Cable/Internet Past Due-See Illegal Interuption
verdict on June 28 2006
MDJ Ballentine
MDJ Simms

7/7/2006
5/26/2006
Stan Caterbone
Stan Caterbone
LCPD Whiteford Lied; did not

Parking Meter
$81.89

Parking Meter
Parking Meter
Parking Meter
Parking Meter
Parking Meter
Parking Meter
Parking Meter
Parking Meter
No Parking or Stoping
5/19/2006
6/16/2006
10/16/2006
10/25/2006
timeserved
timeserved
timeserved
timeserved
10/25/2006
10/16/2006
Stan Caterbone
Picking Up Sheryl; No ticket on van; lied

Parking Meter
$67.50
$62.00
Disorderly Conduct
Careless Driving; Stop Sign Violation

Meter Violation
TR-0001517
TR-0005057
TR-0008503-06
TR-0008735-06
TR-0006812-06
TR-0008037-06
TR-0008066-06
TR-0007880-06
TR-0008721-06
TR-0008578-06
TR-0003557-06
HIA Parking Violation
TR-0004428-06
TR-0003557-06
MDJ Simms/Gjurich, Thomas

TR-0000598-06
MDJ Simms/Gjurich, Thomas-MDJ Roth
TR-0002645-06
TR-0002646-06
MDJ Ballentine/Whiteford
TR-0007528-06
MDJ Simms/Wilcox-Bourne Witness
88
TR-2183-2006
TR-2184-2006
MDJ Eckert Stoltzfus
Case No.
2006-214
2006-215
2006-220
2006-221
2006-222
2006-224
20062005 -
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
Roth
MDJ Ballentine/Whiteford
87
90
Picking up Sheryl at Harrisburg

International, grounded plane,
Lance;Clinton; Wendell married on
Sat night
MDJ Smith/Dauphin Cty
MDJ Solomon/Duaphin
85
89
MDJ Hamilton to Commins
84
86
5/26/2006
4/28/2006
Rubbish-Littering Oct 10
sentence
Careless Driving-Aug 15
Sentence
Stop Sign
7/7/2006
7/7/2006
Driving Under Suspension

Aug 30
Driving Under Suspension
Aug 30
Driving w/out Insurance
MDJ Eckert Stoltzfus
PA Judicial Conduct Review

Board
Parking Meter Oct 5

Sentence
Parking Meter
Notes
Judges
(MDJ William G. Reuter)

MDJ B. Denise Commins)
Court Venue
Dismissed
Dismissed
87.89
1/7/2007
325
75
112
9/13/2006
282.5
9/5/2006
9/5/2006
Date
DISMISSED 01/18/200
DISMISSED 01/18/200
Date
Defendants
Geogelis August
Dismissed June 2006
Eckert
Farina,Reinaker,Cullins,Eckert,Commin
s
2007-
Lancaster County Court of

Common Pleas of Pennsylvania
1/18/2007
Notes
TR-0008735;TR-0008578;TR8721;TR-0008503;TR-0007528
Judges
Court Venue
Date
Date
Defendants
Appeal Summary Conviction EckertStoltzfus jan 19, 2007
Common Pleas/Harassment
8/11/2006
Burger
101
Ap NT-0000562-2006
Common Pleas/Disorderly
Conduct
8/7/2006
Michner
102
Ap NT-0000561-2006
Common Pleas/Obstruct
Roadway
8/11/2006
Michner
TR-0002184-06;tr-0002183-06;NT0000569-06;NT-0000561-06;NT0000562-06
Cullin
Common Pleas
Jan 16-Brief by Commonwealth, Parking

Tickets and Driving Under Suspension
Simms
Judge Cullin Dismissed

01/09/2006
MD-6-2006
Continuance-Eckert Stotzfus
Appeal MD-6Continuance-Eckert
Stotzfus
105
MD-10-2007
Nunc Pro Tunc
Reinaker DENIED 01/08/07
106
MD-11-2007
TR-3557-06 Nunc Pro Tunc Fiorill

Tickets
107
MD-12-2007
108
CP-36-SA-0000159-2006
Nunc Pro Tunc
109
MD-0006-2007
Eckert Change Venue

MOOT not recorded until
01/08/2007
SA-158-07
Simms NT-0001707-2006
Common Pleas - Summary

Conviction - Harassment
6/4/2007
Simms/Gjurich
Ballentine TR-0002658-2006
Common Pleas - Summary

Conviction - w/o Insurnance
5/30/2007
Ballentine/Whiteford
104
Value
(Judge David Reineker)
Ap NT-0000569-2006
111
Description
(MDJ Maynard A. Hamilton, Jr.)
100
Value
(MDJ Stuart J. Mylh)
Change Venue/Continuance Simms

Jan23
110
Description
(MDJ Lm H. Eckert, Jr.)
Case No.
103
$81.89
$997.50
76.89
76.89
MD 51-2007
99
$381.50
SA-154-2007
Nunc Pro Tunc Fiorill Tickets
1/15/2006
ADVANCED
Stan
J. Caterbone
MEDIALitigation
GROUP Accounts
Pro
Valuation
Se Billings
Receivables
Page
Page523
221
50 of 523
221
50
Wednesday
Tuesday November
December 27,
30, 2016

STAN J. CATERBONE and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP LITIGATION VALUATION SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS As of December 27, 2016

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Titolo originale

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

STAN J. CATERBONE and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP LITIGATION VALUATION SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS As of December 27, 2016

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

U.S. District Court 16-4014 CATERBONE v. United States, et.al.

-Book Value Begin/Year

-~ook value w/Year

-Value EQr Share

Stan J. Caterbone's 50,000 shares Value =

Tuesday December 27, 2016

U.S. District Court 16-4014 CATERBONE v. United States, et.al.,

US District Court For The Eastern District of Pennsylvana

Conestoga Man Linked to Theft

Section 3189 Federal Fal

meht Group Ltd.,

The suspect also was served a i

Property of Advance Media Group

Stan J. Caterbone Litigation Valuation

Page 2456 of 2953

Tuesday December 27, 2016

U.S. District Court 16-4014 CATERBONE v. United States, et.al.,

LANCASTER NEWSPAPERS SEPTEMBER 4, 1987

What they failed to state:

Ex-Worker Charged In Burglary At Firm

Conestoga Man linked to Theft

Stan J. Caterbone Litigation Valuation

Tuesday December 27, 2016

U.S. District Court 16-4014 CATERBONE v. United States, et.al.,

Stan J. Caterbone Litigation Valuation

Tuesday December 27, 2016

U.S. District Court 16-4014 CATERBONE v. United States, et.al.,

Stan J. Caterbone Litigation Valuation

Tuesday December 27, 2016

U.S. District Court 16-4014 CATERBONE v. United States, et.al.,

Stan J. Caterbone Litigation Valuation

Tuesday December 27, 2016

U.S. District Court 16-4014 CATERBONE v. United States, et.al.,

Printer Friendly Version

FMG head resigns; team takes reins

Stan J. Caterbone Litigation Valuation

Tuesday December 27, 2016

U.S. District Court 16-4014 CATERBONE v. United States, et.al.,

Content may not be republished without permission.

Stan J. Caterbone Litigation Valuation

Tuesday December 27, 2016

US District Court For The Eastern District of Pennsylvana

Stan J. Caterbone Litigation Valuation

Property of Advance Media Group

Section 3189 Federal False Claim Act

Page 2671 of 2953

Tuesday December 27,

U.S. District Court 16-4014 CATERBONE v. United States, et.al.,

Stan J. Caterbone Litigation Valuation

Tuesday December 27, 2016

U.S. District Court 16-4014 CATERBONE v. United States, et.al.,

n Park II. 1 1 5 9 O r w o n PI*.

New Jersey 08247

Dear Mr. CaWe,

the Board of D i r e s t o m , are in ramipt of y~

A l l u i me to first address the easy points of your pro-1:

desire to cash out h i s

W w i l l not give you one share of Trl: stmk for nostalgic

ex-staff psaple for any reason.

will mibe the price by:

2he build up of any debt, costs, interests and penalties

'me continued defmtion of our corporate nan!e will reduce

Stan J. Caterbone Litigation Valuation